HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 07-14 City Council PacketCouncil /Manager's Workshop 6: 00 p. m
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, July 14, 2003
Council Chambers, Municipal Building .
Meeting No. 03 -14
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
.D.0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes from the June 23, 2003 City Council/Manager er Worksho
ty g p
2. Minutes from the June 23, 2003 City Council Meeting
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
L Nomination for Emergency Management Director
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one
motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. City Clerk Department — Postage Machine Purchase
3. Temporary Gambling -Hill Murray School
4, Safe and Sober Grant Resolution
5. Dearborn Meadow Final Plat (Castle Avenue)
6. Schroeder Milk Financing Plan Revision (2080 Rice Street)
7. Home Occupation License Review — 2492 Highwood Avenue (Cullen)
8. Temporary Off -Site Gambling Resolution - Maplewood Athletic Association
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Woodlynn Pond Twin Homes (County Road D, east of Ariel Street)
Wetland Buffer Variance
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Design Approval
2. 7:15 P.M. Zoning Map Change — R -1 to LBC (1955 McMenemy Street) (St. Paul Area
Association of Realtors) (4 votes)
3. 7:30 P.M. Legacy Village PUD (County Road D and Southlawn Drive)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (4 Votes)
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Tax Abatement Plan
4. 7:45 P.M. Kennard Street, Beam to Count Road D Pro' - •
Y Project 03 04: Approve Resolution
Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing
Approving Plans and Specifications
Authorizing Advertisement for Bids
Authorizing Acquisition of Right-of-Wa
Ordering Assessment Roll
Ordering Assessment Hearing
I. AWARD OF BIDS
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License /Tobacco License — •
Blong Lee for 2728 Stillwater Road
2. Sibley Cove Apartments Tax - Increment Financing Development velopment Agreement (Co. Rd. D)
3. Environmental Utility Fund for Surface Water
ter Management — Receive Special Report and Call
Public Hearing to Consider Establishment of Utility and Fee
4. Hazelwood Street, County Road C to Beam Project 01 -1 •
a. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertisement for Bids
5. Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements Project 02 -10 • •
� � .Resolution Directing Modification of
Existing Construction Contract, Change Order #1
6. Legacy Parkway (Kennard to Southlawn Project 03 -26: •
. )� � Resolution Authorizing Preparation
of Preliminary Report
g p
r`Y p
7. 800 MHz Funding Resolution
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
0. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for ublic hearings p g upon request. The request for this service
must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 77 -
t ) 0 4523 to make arrangements. Assisted
Listening Devices are also available.
Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects o everyone app
hoped that f �' pp ng at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff
and citizens. It is ho
p by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in
at everyone will follow th
it is understood tha We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, reasonable manner.
g p e ese principles: Show respect
for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use res ctfullanguage.
_I�
Be
C.
19
AGEN
EM
DRAFT- MINUTES µ ;
CITY COUNCIUMANAGER WORKSHOP --
Monday, June 23, 2003 Acfm by cA
Council Chambers, City Hall
6:07 p.m. Date
Endorsed
CALL TO ORDER Modified
Rejected '
ROLL CALL --
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
Others Present:
City Manager Fursman
Assistant City Manager Coleman
City Clerk Guilfoile
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the agenda as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
NEW BUSINESS
1. Market Feasibility Study Presentation - Gladstone and Hillcrest Village Areas (Maxfield
Research)
Mary Bujold and Sam Newberg of Maxfield Research presented their study findings for
the Hillcrest Village Area.
Commissioners Rossbach, Trippler and Fischer spoke representing the Planning
Commission.
Boardmember Olson spoke representing the Community Design Review Board.
2. Discussion of Outdoor Basketball
Parks and Recreation Director Anderson gave a report on neighborhood basketball courts
for council consideration. The following persons were heard:
Jana Sand, 2140 Kenwood Drive East, Maplewood
Randall Fane, 2121 Kenwood Drive East, Maplewood
Lynn Munson, 738 Belmont Lane, Maplewood
Alejandro Sia, 2141 Arcade Street, Maplewood
Council/Manager Workshop 06 -23 -03
1
Jana Sand, 2140 Kenwood Drive East, Maplewood (Second Appearance)
E. FUTURE TOPICS
I . Sidewalk Study- Overall City Plan -Fall 2003
2. Meeting with School District 623-August/September
F. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Collins moved to adjourn at 7:25 .m.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
Council/Manager Workshop 06 -23 -03 2
AGENDA rrEM NO I iooe
""mom
DRAFT -- MINUTES --
A.
Be
C.
I[a
E.
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:30 P.M., June 23, 2003
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 03 -13
CALL TO ORDER:
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal Building, p g�
was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember
Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember
Present
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes from the City Council/Manager Workshop -June 09, 2003
Councilmember Collins moved to a rove the Council/Mana er Worksho Minutes of June 9
2003 as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
2. Minutes from the City Council Meeting -June 9, 2003
Councilmember Collins moved to a rove the City Council Meeting Minutes of June 9 2003 as
amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
M 1. City Attorney
M2. League of Minnesota Cities Convention
M3. Finance Department
M4. Peter Fischer
N1. Reschedule City Council Meeting
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the aizenda as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
Citv Council Meeting 06-23-03
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1. Human Relations Commission Appointments
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Lieutenant Kevin Rabbet provided specifics of the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to...aavoint Roberta Hawkins and Maril Gebauer to
yn the
Ma lewood Human Relations Commission and to reappoint Elmo Mattox to a new three- ear
term.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
2. 2002 Financial Audit Report and Audit
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Finance Director Faust provided specifics of the report.
p p
C. Chris Omdahl of KPMG reviewed the annual audit report.
Councilmember Collins moved to accept the 2002 Annual Financial Report.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
3. Emergency Management Director Candidate
a. Mayor Cardinal presented the report.
b. Bud Berry, the applicant was present for questions.
C. Judson Freed, the Emergency Management Director for Ramsey County, was p resent to
meet the council.
No action was taken.
G. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$358,258.61 Checks #61068 thru #61135 dated 6/10/03
$143,223.68 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 5/29 thru 5/30/03
$350.00 Checks #61136 thru #61137 dated 6/9 thru
6/12/03
Citv Council Meetine 06-23-03 2
$149,620.98 Checks #61138 thru #61192 dated 6/17/03
$259,662.68 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 6/6 thru 6/12/03
$911,115.95 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$414,845.30 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
6/6/03
$25,921.32 Payroll Deduction checks #93819 thru #93826
dated 6/6/03
$440,766.62 Total Payroll
$1 GRAND TOTAL
2. Human Relations Commission 2002 -2003 Annual Report
Accepted the Human Relations Commission annual report for 2002 -2003.
3. Conditional Use Permit Review -Lexus Automobile Dealership (3000 Maplewood Drive)
Approved to review the conditional use permit for the Lexus automobile dealershi p at
3000 Maplewood Drive again only if a problem develops or if the owner proposes a
p p
major change.
4. Temporary Fireworks Permit Fee
Set the Temporary Fireworks Permit Fee at $100.00.
5. Parkway Lift Station Removal, City Project 02 -14 — Resolution Approving Final
pp g
Assessment Roll Adjustment
Approved the following Resolution for the Adoption of the Revised Assessment Roll for
the Parkway Lit Station Removal Improvements, Project 02 -14:
RESOLUTION 03 -06 -114
ADJUSTMENTS TO ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on May 12 2003 the
Y >
assessment roll for the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, Project 02 -14 was resented i
J � p na
Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chap ter 429 and
WHEREAS, one property owner filed an objection to their assessments according o
g the
requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows:
1. Gary and Aileen Blair (PIN 172922440018 and -0019) request that their property be assessed
Citv Council Meetine 06-23-03 3
at the residential rate rather than the commercial rate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD
MINNESOTA:
A. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to make the following
adjustments to the assessment roll for the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, City Project -
14:
p y J 02
1. Gary and Aileen Blair (PIN 172922440018 and - 0019): Grant request that both parcels be
assessed at the residential rate rather than the commercial rate.
B. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extendin
g over a period of 15
years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January ry 2004 and shall bear
interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To
the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until
December 31, 2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on 1 y al
unpaid installments.
C. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, but no later than August 1, 2003, pay the whole of the assessment on
such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city lerk except that no Y � p interest
i
shall be charged f the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; p ,and
they may, at any time after August 1, 2003, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such a ent is made.
Such p �
payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of
the next succeeding year.
D. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after August 1, 2003, but no later than
September 2, 2003, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the count auditor to be ex
ended
on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and p aid over the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
6. Housing Replacement Fund Transfer to the Park Development Fund
Approved to credit the Park Development Fund $82,683 for the sale of Lot Seven of the
Gladstone Park.
7. Transfer to Close Fund for Carver Avenue Trunk Sanitary Sewer, Project 03-17
Approved a transfer of $6,567.40 from the General Fund to the project fund to finance the
. . p J
feasibility study cost and authorize the appropriate budget changes.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to aiDDrove consent a enda items 1 and 3 -7 as resented.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
Councilmember Juenemann moved to a rove consent a enda item 2 as resented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
Citv Council Meetine 06 -23 -03 4
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 8:32 p.m Tax- Increment Financing Sibley Cove
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. Associate Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report.
C. Boardmember Olson presented comments from the Comm' unit Y � Desi Review Board
meeting.
d. David Steele, the applicant thanked the city and staff for their support of the project.
e. Norm Jones, attorney for the applicant, reminded the council why Sibley Cove is a good
project.
f. Mary Ippel from Briggs and Morgran provided further specifics.
g. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following persons were heard:
None
h. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution establishing a tax - increment
financing district for the Sibley Cove Apartment of County Road D and Ariel Street for up to 26
ears:
RESOLUTION 03 -06 -115
APPROVING THE MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ESTABLISHING HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -8
AND APPROVING THE TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR WITHIN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
WHEREAS:
A. WHEREAS, there is a proposal to modify the Development Program for Development
District No. 1, and establish Housing District No. 1 -8 therein and approve and accept the ro osed Tax
p p
Increment Financing Plan therefor under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179
(the "Act "); and
B. WHEREAS, the proposed Modification to the Development Program for Development
District p
istrict No. 1 (the "Modification "), and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing
g District No
1 -8 (the "Tax Increment Financing Plan ") have been prepared; and
C. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment
of Development District istrict No. 1 and Housing District No. 1 -8 therein, and the adp proposed
o tion of a ro osed
development program and tax increment financing plan therefor, including, but not limited to , notification of
Citv Council MeetinLy 06-23-03 5
Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 622 having taxing jurisdiction over the ro ert t be
g gproperty Y o
included in Housing District No. 1 -8 and the holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice
as required by law; and
as follows.: p
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood
.
1. Modification Findings The City finds, determines and declares that with respect to the
Modification:
(a) The City is not modifying the boundaries of Development District No. 1 but is,
however, modifying the Development Program to allow for the increased costs associated with Housing
District No. 1 -8 as described in the Modification.
2. Housing District No. 1-8 There is established in the City of Maplewood within Development
District No. 1 a Tax Increment Financing District, the initial boundaries of which are fixed and determined
as described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan.
3. Tax Increment Financing Plan The Tax Increment Financing Plan is adopted as the tax
increment financing plan for Housing District No. 1 -8, and the City Council makes the following findings:
g g
(a) Housing District No. 1 -8 is a housing district as defined in Minnesota Statutes
Section 469.174, Subd. 11, the specific basis for such determination being hat the 80 unit It rental housing
facility project will provide safe, decent, affordable, sanitary housing for residents of the city and it will
result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the State.
(b) The proposed redevelopment in the opinion of the City Council, would not occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market
value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would
be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after
subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of Housing District
No. 1 -8 permitted by the Tax Increment Financing Plan.
The reasons supporting this finding are that:
(i) Private investment will not finance these development activities because of
prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these development activities through the
use of tax increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will
occur within Development District No. L
(ii) A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without
establishment of Housing District No. 1 -8 and the use of tax increments has been
performed as described above. Such analysis is found in Exhibit E of the Tax
Increment FinancingPlan, and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated
market value of the site absent the establishment of Housing District No. 1-8 and the
use of tax increments.
(c) The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -8 conforms to the
general plan for development or redevelopment of the City of Maplewood as a whole.
The reasons for supporting this finding are that:
Citv Council Meeting 06-23-03 6
(i) Housing District No. 1 -8 is properly zoned; and
The Tax Increment Financing Plan will generally compliment and serve to
implement policies adopted by the City.
(d) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with
the sound needs of the City of Maplewood as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of
Development District No. 1 by private enterprise.
The reasons supporting this finding are that:
The development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment b
private enterprise can occur within Development District No. 1.
4. Public Purpose The adoption of the Modification to the Development p Program for
Development District No. 1, and the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No.
1 -8 therein conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develo p an
area of the State which is already built up to provide employment opportunities and provide safe decent
sanitary housing for all residents of the city to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of
the State and thereby serves a public purpose.
S. Certification The Auditor of Ramsey .County is requested to certify the original net tax
capacity of Housing District No. 1 -8 as described in Tax Increment Financing Plan, and to certify in each
year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased in accordance
with the Act; and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit thi request to the County
Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within
Housing District No. 1 -8 for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately
preceding the adoption of this Resolution.
6. Fi' link The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Development
Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -8 with the Commissioner of
Revenue.
7. Administration The administration of Development District No. 1 is assigned to the Cit
Y
Clerk who shall from time to time be granted such powers. and duties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Sections 469.130 and 469.131 as the City Council may deem appropriate.
Y
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
2. 8:50 p.m. Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements, Project 02 -10
p � �
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report.
C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following person was heard:
None
d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Citv Council Meeting 06-23-03 7
Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution ap roving the adoption of the
supplemental assessment roll for the Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, Project 02 -10.
This project item is budgeted at $60,000 out of the total assessments of 1.1 million (2.5 million
dollar protect): e
RESOLUTION 03 -06 -116
ADOPTING SUPPLEMTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on May 26, 2003, calling for a
Supplemental Public Hearing, the supplemental assessment roll for Parcel 15- 29 -22 -43 -0016
(Presentation Church, 1725 Kennard Street N.) of the Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements, Cit
Prod ect 02 -10, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
and
WHEREAS, the property owner has not filed an objection to their assessments according to the
requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review any objection received and
report to the City Council at the regular meeting on July 14, 2003, as to their recommendations
for adjustments.
2. The supplemental assessment roll for Parcel 15- 29 -22 -43 -0016 (Presentation Church, 1725
Kennard Street N.) of the Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby. adopted. Said supplemental assessment roll shall
constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein
included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15
years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2004 and shall
bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date
of this resolution until December 31, 2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to
the county auditor, but no later than August 1, 2003, pay the whole of the assessment on such
property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the Y cit clerk , exce p t that no interest
shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
resolution; and they may, at any time after August 1, 2003, pay to the count y auditor the entire
amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in
i Y
which such payment s made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will
be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year.
5. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after August 1, 2003, but no later than September
210 2003, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on
the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and p aid over the same
Citv Council MeetinLy 06 -23 -03
manner as other municipal taxes.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
3. 8:55 p.m. St. Paul Regional Water Services McCarron's Water Treatment Plant
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. Associate Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report.
C. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission Report.
d. Boardmember Olson presented the Design Review Board Report.
e. Jim Butler, architect for the project provided further specifics.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a stream setback
variance at the St. Paul Water Re Tonal Water Service at the McCarron's Water Treatment Plant:
RESOLUTION 03 -06 -117
STREAM SETBACK VARIANCE
WHEREAS, David Wagner, of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services, asked the city to approve a
stream setback variance from the zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to the water utility property at 1900 Rice Street. The legal
description is:
SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 IN THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD REVISED
DESCRIPTION NUMBER 175 A SPECIFIC PART OF SEC 18, TN 29 R 22. PIN 18- 29- 22 -31-
.
0042)
WHEREAS, Section 36- 196(h) of the wetland protection ordinance requires a 60- foot -wide stream
buffer area next to streams.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 40- foot -wide stream buffer.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On June 2, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
variance.
2. The city council held a public hearing on June 23, 2003. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The
council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and P resent written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
variance for the following reasons:
Citv Council Meetine 06-23-03 9
1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to
the property. The 60- foot -wide stream buffer requirement would make development of this site
difficult.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, since the applicant
would greatly improve a portion of the stream buffer over its present state and the proposed
development plans will treat storm water from the site with rainwater gardens, bio- retention
basins and other best management practices.
Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following:
1. Dedicating a 40- foot -wide stream protection buffer easement along the west property line of
the site adjacent to the future cold storage building and creating a buffer along the entire length
of the stream contained or bordering their property. The buffer shall be 50 feet wide in all
possible areas. This easement shall be prepared by a land surveyor, shall describe the boundary
. Y � rY
of the buffer and shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, grading, filling or dumping
within the buffer. The applicant shall record this easement before the city issues a building
permit.
2. Submitting a revised landscape plan for the restoration of all the stream - protection buffer on
the west side of the site, including all the day - lighted parts of Trout Brook. This plan shall show
extensive use of native plantings and grasses and shall be subject to city staff and watershed
district approval.
3. Installing city approved signs at the edge of the stream - protection buffer that prohibit any
building, mowing, cutting, grading, filling or dumping within the buffer.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use
p ermit revision for the addition of four building a new - parkin lot and associated site lan
chanizes for the St. Paul Regional Water Services McCarron's Water Treatment Plant at 1900
Rice Street North:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION 03 -06 -118
WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Water Utility has requested a revision to their conditional use permit to add
four new buildings, parking and landscaping to plant facilities at the St. Paul Water Utility McCarron's
Water Treatment Plant.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1900 Rice Street North. The legal description is:
SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 IN THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD REVISED
DESCRIPTION NUMBER 175 A SPECIFIC PART OF SEC 18, TN 29 R 22. PIN 18-29-22-31 -
0042)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 2, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city pp council approve
this permit.
Citv Council Meeting 06 -23 -03 10
2. On June 23 2003, the city council: held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave P Y g everyone at
the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surroundin g area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall'become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the design lans for the St. Paul Regional Water
Citv Council Meetine 06 -23 -03 11
Services McCarron's Water Treatment Plant at 1900 Rice Street North:
Approve the plans (date - stamped April 24, 2003) for the proposed office building, meter shop
and vehicle maintenance buildings (with the associated parking and landscaping) at the St. Paul
Regional Water Services McCarron's Water Treatment Plant at 1900 Rice Street North. This
approval does not include the future cold vehicle storage building shown on the plans along the
west side of the site.. The city bases this approval on findings required by the code. The property
owner or contractor shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a permit for this project.
2. Provide the following for city staff approval before the city issues a grading or building
permit:
a. Building material and color samples of the plaster, metal panels, roofs, trim, and garage
doors.
b. A revised landscape /screening plan that shows the following:
(1) The spruce trees proposed for the south and east sides of the parking lot and the
property revised from 6 feet in height to 8 feet in height.
(2) The planting of more coniferous trees along the south and east sides of the
proposed parking lot to help screen the parking lot from the houses to the south
and east.
(3) Landscaping details for the stream buffer area and for the proposed rainwater
gardens. If the basin area will only be seeded, the area must be vegetated with
native grasses and forbes. The mix design must be approved by the city before the
contractor does the seeding.
(4) An in- ground irrigation system (including sprinkler heads) for the areas that
would have sod. The city does not require irrigation for areas with native grasses
or for the rainwater gardens.
c. Detailed grading, drainage, paving, utility and erosion control plan for approval by
the Assistant City Engineer. These plans shall meet all the requirements of the
Assistant City Engineer.
d. A detailed photometric plan for all proposed outdoor lighting showing the location,
style, height and design of the proposed light fixtures. All freestanding lights shall
not be taller than 25 feet, and the illumination from any outdoor light must not exceed
0.4 -foot candles at all property lines.
e. Plans for any trash - dumpster enclosures. The gates for such enclosures shall be 100
percent opaque, and the materials and colors of the enclosure shall be compatible with
those of the new buildings. These plans shall be subject to staff approval.
f. Proof of recording of a 40- foot -wide stream protection buffer easement along the west
property line. This easement shall be prepared by a land surveyor, shall describe the
boundary of the buffer and shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or
Citv Council 05 -27 -03 12
dumping within the buffer. The applicant shall record this easement before the city issues
a building permit.
g. A letter of credit or cash escrow for all required exterior improvements. The amount
shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work.
3. Complete and install all required exterior improvements, including the approved
landscaping and any dumpster enclosures before occupying the buildings.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The above - required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of
Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor
shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 if occupancy
of the building is in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy of the
building if occupancy is in the spring or summer.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. 'The director of community development may
Y
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. White Bear Avenue Intersection Improvements at Woodlyn and Lydia, Project 01 -08
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt a motion to concur with Ramsey County in awarding a
construction contract to Jay Brothers in the amount of $158,096.00 and approve a cost share of
$79,048.00 for Maplewood's share from the city's MSAS account for the White Bear Avenue
Improvements at Woodl3M and Lydia, City Protect 01 -08.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. 2:00 a.m. Bar Closing
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented specifics from the report.
Citv Council 05 -27 -03 13
Councilmember Collins moved to schedule a Public Hearing for the first meetin in September
to address the 2:00 a.m. bar closing.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann
2. Outdoor Event -The Chalet
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal,
Councilmembers Koppen,
Juenemann and Collins
Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk
b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented specifics from the report.
C. Brad Karl, the applicant and owner of the Chalet Lounge was present for questions.
d. James Roehl, a volunteer from Make -A -Wish was also present for questions.'
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Outdoor event for Brad Karl at the Chalet Lounge
at 1820 Rice Street.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmember
Juenemann, Koppen and Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmember Collins
3. Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution showing the city council's
intent to comply with the Livable Communities Demonstration Account Program contract
requirements for the requested $8,000 opportunity grant for planning_ purposes for the Gladstone
Neighborhood:
RESOLUTION 03 -06 -119
AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION
FOR AN OPPORTUNITY GRANT
THROUGH THE
LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing
Incentives Program for 2003 as determined by the Metropolitan Council and is, therefore, eligible to
make application for funds under the Livable Communities Demonstration Account; and
WHEREAS, the city has identified a proposed project within the city that meets the Demonstration
Account's purpose and criteria; and
Citv Council 05 -27 -03 14
WHEREAS, the city has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate
project administration; and
WHEREAS, the city certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in
the contract agreements: and
WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota agrees to act as legal sponsor for
the project contained in the opportunity grant application submitted on June 2, 2003;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the city manager is ' hereby authorized to apply to the
Metropolitan Council for this funding on behalf of the City of Maplewood and to execute such
agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
4. Larpenteur /Adolphus Redevelopment Site
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal,
Councilmembers Collins, Juenemann
and Kopp en
Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk
b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Collins moved authorize city staff to request a proposal for housing
redevelopment of the five city -owned properties on the northwest corner of Larpenteur Avenue
and Adolphus Street for 11 town home units.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann
5. Kennard Street Improvements
Ayes - Councilmembers Collins,
Juenemann and Wasiluk
Nays -Mayor Cardinal and
Councilmember Koppen
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adopt the following resolution that receives the Preliminqu
Report; calls a Public Hearing for July 14, 2003 at 7:45 pm, authorized preparation of plans and
specifications at an additional budget expense of $10,000; and authorizes the engineering staff to
begin negotiations for the necessary right of way for the Kennard Street Improvements Beam to
County Road D, , City Project 03 -04:
RESOLUTION 03 -06 -120
ACCEPTING REPORT
CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATIONS FOR RIGHT OF WAY
Citv Council 05 -27 -03 15
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted May 12, 2003, a report has been
prepared under the direction of the city engineer with reference to the improvement of Kennard Street
(Beam to County Road D), City Project 03 -04, and this report was received by the council on June 23,
2003, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost - effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the
assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost for Phase One of the improvement of
$2
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 14th day of July 2003 in the
council chambers of city hall at 7:45 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of
such hearing and improvement as required by law.
3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to proceed with preparation of plans and specifications
for the making of this improvement. The Finance Director is directed to transfer an additional
$100,000 into the project fund for the preparation of said plans.
4. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to begin negotiations on behalf of the City for acquisition
of the necessary right of way and easements for the making of this improvement as described
within the preliminary report. The City Engineer is further directed to delay preparation of
formal offers for property until the City Council has heard all appropriate public testimony and
consider ordering the project to construction.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Annual Community Development Tour, July 22 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.- Assistant City
Manager Coleman invited the council, Human Relations Committee, Community Design
Review Board, Planning Commission and Parks and Recreations Committees to attend.
There will be a picnic lunch following at Battle Creek Park.
2. City Attorney Kelly -Mayor Cardinal commended City Attorney Kelly for concluding a
year as President of the Ramsey County Bar. Mr. Kelly added that he has been nominated
to serve at Secretary for the State Bar in the upcoming year and President by the year
2005.
3. League of Minnesota Cities Convention- Councilmember Juenemann shared positive
feedback and comments from the League of Minnesota Cities Convention.
Citv Council 05 -27 -03 16
4. Finance Department - Councilmember Collins commended the complete Finance
Department for their continued excellent work.
5. Peter Fisher - Councilmember Collins announced Parks and Recreation member Peter
Fisher received the 2002 Public Service Award from Friend of the Parks and Trails.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. July 28th City Council Meeting Rescheduling
Councilmember Koppen moved to reschedule the second council meeting of July to Tuesda
July 22, 2003 7:00 p.m. (6:00-p.m. Council/Manager Workshop)
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Collins moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:06 p.m.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - All
Citv Council 05 -27 -03 17
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS, ed
Rejected
�
DATE: July 7, 2003 Re
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
nAZTAT7)T T77
$73,700.65 Checks #61193 thru #61240 dated 6/24/03
$1,171,,760.68 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 6/13 thru 6/19/03
$16 Checks #61241 thru #61243 dated 6/25 thru
6/27/03
$180,137.46 Checks #61244 thru #61 295 dated 7/1 /03
$251,389.72 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 6/20 thru 6/26/03
$241.,788.24 Checks #61296 thru #61346 dated 7/8/03
$75,058.64 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 6/27 thru 7/2/03
$2,010,165.97 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$420,881.28 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
$2,885,786.50 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any
questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation
on file if necessary.
hu
attachments
PARNANCEMORMAGMApC1Ar 070703.doc
1
6/20/03
$24,466.07
Payroll Deduction checks #93968 thru #93973
dated 6/20/03
$423,850.36
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
7/3/03
$6,422.82
Payroll Deduction checks #94114 thru #94120
dated 7/3/03
$875
Total Payroll
$2,885,786.50 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any
questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation
on file if necessary.
hu
attachments
PARNANCEMORMAGMApC1Ar 070703.doc
1
vchlfst , Check Register Page: 1
06120/2003 9:56:08AM City of Maplewood
Check Date
61193
6/24/2003
61194
6/24/2003
61195
6/24/2003
61196
6/24/2003
61197
6/24/2003
Vendor
Descriotion /Account
00111
00152
00202
02502
01986
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC
BANICK, JOHN
BOHL, JOHN
BOHMBACH, JOSHUA
BUSACK, DANIEL
PATROL & BOARDING FEES
REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS 2/26 -6/4
REIMBURSE FOR MEALS 6/9 - 6/11
REIMBURSE FOR BOOTS
REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS 5/14 - 6/4
REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS 2/26 - 4/
STRUCTURAL ENGR EMERG TRNG
STRUCTURAL ENGR EMERG TRG - 2
PROF SRVS HIJACEK PROP 5/19
REIMB FOR MEALS & MILEAGE 6/5 - 6/7
REIMB FOR MEALS & PRKG 5/20 - 6/13
REIMBURSE FOR MEAL 6/10
EASEMENT PREPARATION THRU 5/30
SEWER IMPRV SERVICE THRU 5/30
PROJ 02 -10 TREE REMOVAL
PROJ 02 -10 REMOVE BUCKTHORN
SOFTBALL UMPIRES THRU 6/15
REIMBURSE FOR BOOTS
REIMB FOR MEALS & MILEAGE 6/5 - 6/8
REF GRADING ESC -2709 RED SPENDER
ANNUAL CONF REGISTRATION FEE - 2
MPELRA SUMMER CONF REGISTRATI
REF GRADING ESC - FERNDALE ST SO
REIMBURSE FOR MEAL - 6/10
STRATUS SOFTWARE MAINT - JUL
PUMP PERFORMANCE INSPECTIONS
REIMB MEALS & MILEAGE 6/5 TO 6/7
POUR CONCRETE SLAB AT NATURE CT
TEST BACKFLOW PREVENTER
SEWER CHARGE
MONTHLY UTIL - BILLING DATE 6/15/03
SEWER CHARGES & SECURITY LIGHT
REF RITA JOHNSON - RECEPTION
REF WEBSTER MAGNET SCH - GROUP
REF CORJENNA CHEUNG - PARTY
REF SUSAN JORGENSEN - MEMBERSHI
REF SANDRA DON - MEMBERSHIP
REF INDIAN YOUTH ENRICH - GROUP
REF KEELY TADDEINI - MCC PROGRAM
MCC PROSHOP LOGO
REF CHRIS RHOADES - KNOLLWOOD C
COLLECTION AGENCY FEE
MN SMOKE -EATER SUSCRIPTIONS - 89
REIMBURSE FOR PRKG & MILEAGE 5/2
RECYCLE - MAY
REIMBURSE MEAL 5/29
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS NO
BOILER REPAIR
TELEVISE SEWER
REF AMB 03007401 J KITTEL
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSP
MONTHLY LEASE RICOH COPIER - JUN
PROJ 03 -02 ON SITE FUEL
61198
6/24/2003
02829
61199
6/24/2003
02829
61200
6/24/2003
02761
61201
6/24/2003
02102
61202
6/24/2003
00520
61203
6/24/2003
00668
61204
6/24/2003
00684
CEC
CEC
DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW AND UBAN
DUELLMAN, AMY
FLOR, TIMOTHY W
HIEBERT, STEVEN
HOWARD R GREEN COMPANY
61205 6/24/2003 00687 HUGO'S TREE CARE
61206
6/24/2003
00721
61207
6/24/2003
02830
61208
6/24/2003
00810
61209
6/24/2003
02828
61210
6/24/2003
00857
61211
6/24/2003
00906
61212
6/24/2003
02832
61213
6/24/2003
02823
61214
6/24/2003
00945
61215
6/24/2003
00953
61216
6/24/2003
01012
61217
6/24/2003
02831
61218
6/24/2003
01162
61219
6/24/2003
01175
61220
6/24/2003
00001
61221
6/24/2003
00001
61222
6/24/2003
00001
61223
6/24/2003
00001
61224
6/24/2003
00001
61225
6/24/2003
00001
61226
6/24/2003
00001
61227
6/24/2003
02824
61228
6/24/2003
02833
61229
6/24/2003
00069
61230
6/24/2003
01478
61231
6/24/2003
02250
61232
6/24/2003
01560
61233
6/24/2003
01573
61234
6/24/2003
01574
61235
6/24/2003
01675
61236
6/24/2003
02069
61237
6/24/2003
02825
61238
6/24/2003
01734
61239
6/24/2003
02410
61240
6/24/2003
01798
INDEPENDENT SPORTS NETWORK
JAROSCH, JON
KONDER, RONALD W
KUNEL, BLAKE A
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
MPELRA
MAPLEWOOD LAND & PARTNERSHIP
MARTIN, JERROLD
MASYS CORP
MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY
MILLER, NICK
MJE MASONRY & CONCRETE INC
NEW MECH COMPANIES INC
NORTH ST PAUL, CITY OF
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
REED, HEIDI
RHOADES, CHRISTOPHER R
RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES
SMOKE EATER
STAHNKE, JULIE
SUPERIOR SERVICES INC
SZCZEPANSKI, TOM
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
U.H.L. CO. INC.
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
W P S MEDICARE PART B
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
WELLS FARGO LEASING INC
YOCUM OIL CO.
Amount
919.26
1,417.90
21.28
34.99
436.46
607.50
170.00
85.00
2,851.86
154.56
46.25
8.00
1,887.84
423.47
8,985.60
95.85
3,008.00
60.00
184.22
1,029.04
590.00
195.00
9,936.30
8.00
738.68
105.00
148.95
3100.00.
270.00
218.29
1,780.43
401.92
255.00
154.00
45.00
42.15
35.00
29.50
15.00
250.00
1,034.93
33.00
386.50
20.95
18,586.56
4.75
868.41
6,539.80
170.00
170.17
3,608.00
1,420.71
111.57
i
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
06/20/2003 9:56:08AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
48 Checks in this report
Descrimien /Acr_mint
Amount
Total checks : 73,700.65
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date
Date
Payee
Description
Amount
06/12/03
06/13/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
13
06/12/03
06/13/03
DCRP /Flex account
DCRP & Flex plan payments
135.93
06/12/03
06/13/03
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
986.50
06/13/03
06/16/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
12
06/16/03
06/17/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
12
06/17/03
06/18/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
13
06/18/03
06/19/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
10,071.48
06/11/03
06/19/03
MN Dept of Revenue
Sales Tax
4
06/19/03
06/19/03
Wells Fargo
Investment repurchase
1
06/13/03
06/19/03
Elan Financial Services*
Purchasing card items
51
TOTAL
1,171, 760.68
*Detailed listings of Elan purchasing card items are attached
Transaction Review 6/10/2003
For Transactions posted between 05/31/2003 to 06/06/2003
Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name
06/04/2003
ATC VERIZONWIRELESSWR
64.28 BRUCE K ANDERSON
06/04/2003
SPRINTPCS - SPEEDPAYIVR
78.81 BRUCE K ANDERSON
06/05/2003
AWARDS OF AMERICA
1,373.22 BRUCE K ANDERSON
06/05/2003
CUB FOODS, INC.
13.70 MANDY ANZALDI
06/05/2003
TARGET 00011858
49.01 MANDY ANZALDI
06/06/2003
TOYS R US #6046
26.57 MANDY ANZALDI
06/02/2003
PANASONIC SERVICE PART
126.69 JOHN BANICK
06/02/2003
AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 302
820.63 JOHN BANICK
06/04/2003
GRAFIX SHOPPE
181.05 JOHN BANICK
06/02/2003
AQUA LOGIC INC
1,053.63 JIM BEHAN
06/06/2003
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
25.29 JIM BEHAN
06/02/2003
ICMA
744.00 MELINDA COLEMAN
06/06/2003
GOPHER SPORT
223.40 LINDA CROSSON
06/05/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
66.52 ROBERTA DARST
06/06/2003
SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL
30.00 ROBERTA DARST
06/06/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
17.39 ROBERTA DARST
06/06/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
111.18 KATHLEEN DOHERTY
06/02/2003
ARCH
283.72 TOM EASTMAN
06/02/2003
DEX MEDIA ONLINE
112.80 TOM EASTMAN
06/03/2003
BASS BULLETIN & DIRECTORY
695.50 TOM EASTMAN
06/04/2003
OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER
126.74 DOUG EDGE
06/02/2003
CUB FOODS, INC.
22.00 VIRGINIA ERICKSON
06/04/2003
GAL DYNAMED CATALOG
106.23 PAUL E. EVERSON
06/04/2003
GAL DYNAMED CATALOG
730.80 PAUL E EVERSON
06/02/2003
UNITY ELECTRONICS INC
45.48 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/02/2003
BEST BUY 00000109
37.26 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/04/2003
WWW.CIRCUITCITY.COM
138.41 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/04/2003
OFFICE MAX 00002204
110.75 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/04/2003
OFFICE MAX 00002204
- 110.75 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/04/2003
OFFICE MAX 00002204
137.38 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/06/2003
PC FURNITURE STORE LLC
290.85 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/06/2003
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
105.88 RONALD FREBERG
06/06/2003
LESCO INC
207.68 RONALD FREBERG
06/03/2003
SPRINTPCS AUTOPYMT RC 1
97.32 RICHARD FURSMAN
06/02/2003
CUB FOODS, INC.
76.00 VIRGINIA GAYNOR
06/02/2003
MN PHOTO
44.30 CLARENCE GERVAIS
06/02/2003
AMOCO 07847502
4.11 MIKE GRAF
06/02/2003
TARGET 00011858
12.76 MIKE GRAF
06/05/2003
STREAMLINE DESIGN
546.84 MIKE GRAF
06/05/2003
MOBILE DJ NETWORK
350.00 MIKE GRAF
06/02/2003
NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT
114.97 KEVIN HALWEG
06/04/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
81.05 LORI HANSON
06/02/2003
FACTORY CARD OUTLET #284
7.51 HEIDI HERSOM
06/02/2003
DGI DYNAMIC GRAPHICS
79.00 HEIDI HERSOM
06/06/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
23.07 HEIDI HERSOM
06/05/2003
HEJNY RENTALS INC
228.60 GARY. HINNENKAMP
06/02/2003
PSW FRONTIER PRO SHOP
50.55 RON HORWATH
06/05/2003
OFFICE MAX 00002204
15.97 STEVE HURLEY
06/06/2003
CABLING SERVICES CORPORAT .
1,912.03 STEVE HURLEY
06/02/2003
BLIMPIES SUBS SALADS
6.91 KEVIN JOHNSON
06/03/2003
MN PHOTO
12.87 KEVIN JOHNSON
06/03/2003
GANDER MOUNTAIN
10 1. 12 KEVIN JOHNSON
06/05/2003
MILLS FLEET FARM #27
77.06 KEVIN JOHNSON
06/02/2003
MAYFLOWER DISTRIBUTING
32.35 FLINT KARIS
06/03/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
462.21 SHERYL L LE
06/04/2003
MENARDS OAKDALE
356.90 DENNIS LINDORFF
06/04/2003
MENARDS 3022
-2.13 DENNIS LINDORFF
06/06/2003
LAUSENG STONE INC
79.87 DENNIS LINDORFF
06/04/2003
CHAMPS #4019
69.99 JOHNNIE LU
5
06/06/2003
06/03/2003
06/02/2003
06/02/2003
06/03/2003
06/03/2003
06/04/2003
06/04/2003
06/05/2003
06/06/2003
06/02/2003
06/04/2003
06/02/2003
06/02/2003
06/02/2003
06/02/2003
06/03/2003
06/05/2003
06/06/2003
06/06/2003
06/04/2003
06/06/2003
06/02/2003
06/05/2003
06/02/2003
06/03/2003
06/06/2003
06/02/2003
06/04/2003
06/02/2003
06/06/2003
06/02/2003
06/03/2003
06/02/2003
06/02/2003
06/02/2003
06/05/2003
06/05/2003
06/06/2003
06/02/2003
06/02/2003
06/03/2003
06/05/2003
STREICHER'S POLICE EQP
ADT SECURITY SERVICES
NATIONAL WATERWORKS 230
STREICHER'S POLICE EQP
COMMONWEALTH ELECTRIC MN
COMMONWEALTH ELECTRIC MN
LTG POWER EQUIPMENT
ON SITE SANITATION, IN
DAVIS WATER EQUIPMENT CO
KEEPRS
ARMSTRONG MDCL IND INC
MADISON VIDEO REPAIR
INTER CITY TRUCK SVC ASA
MERIT CHEVROLET
KATH AUTO PARTS
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
TOUSLEY FORD I27200021
BORGEN RADIATOR CO
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
DALCO 01 OF 01
DALCO 01 OF 01
AOL ONLINE SERVICE 0503
WALGREEN 00069955
MENARDS MAPLEWOOD
CUB FOODS, INC.
MENARDS OAKDALE
NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS
THE UPS STORE #2171
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
DE LAGE LANDEN OPOI OF O1
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC
MENARDS MAPLEWOOD
ASPEN MILLS, INC
NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT CO
TWIN CITY HARDWARE
HIRSHFIELD'S MAPLEWOOD
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
T- MOBILE
MINUTEMAN PRESS
CUB FOODS, INC.
45.74 JOHNNIE LU
155.57 STEVE LUKIN
46.86 DAVID LUTZ
44.07 JASON P MARINO
79.50 MARK MARUSKA
509.18 MARK MARUSKA
57.56 MARK MARUSKA
355.60 MARK MARUSKA
133.42 RICHARD NORDQUIST
159.90 JULIE S OLSON
123.74 KURT PARSONS
162.89 PHILIP F POWELL
1,186.87 STEVEN PRIEM
- 1,491.00 STEVEN PRIEM
100.43 STEVEN PRIEM
793.69 STEVEN PRIEM
41.92 STEVEN PRIEM
66.29 STEVEN PRIEM
-13.05 STEVEN PRIEM
41.34 STEVEN PRIEM
147.00 KEVIN RABBETT
34.38 KEVIN RABBETT
1,220.98 MICHAEL REILLY
40.37 MICHAEL REILLY
23.90 AUDRA ROBBINS
1 82.77 PAUL SCHLINGMAN
85.65 PAUL SCHLINGMAN
25.08 RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
9.77 GERALD SEEGER
347.49 ANDREA SINDT
8.89 SCOTT STEFFEN
123.52 JOANNE M SVENDSEN
450.34 JOANNE M SVENDSEN
46.39 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
98.77 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
223.25 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
83:71. RUSTIN SVENDSEN
23.11 LYLE SWANSON
31.07 LYLE S WANS ON
10.36 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN
100.81 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN
420.58 HOLLY URBANSKI
17.07 SUSAN ZWIEG
19,243.11
[I*
Transaction Review 6/17/2003
For Transactions posted between 06/07/2003 to 06/13/2003
Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name
06/09/2003
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
20.77 MARK ALDRIDGE
06/09/2003
MICHAELS #9401
56.38 MANDY ANZALDI
06/09/2003
TARGET 00011858
38.03 MANDY ANZALDI
06/10/2003
CUB FOODS, INC.
26.11 MANDY ANZALDI
06/09/2003
WEBER & TROSETH INC
131.50 JOHN BANICK
06/09/2003
GRAINGER 500
76.45 JOHN BANICK
06/11/2003
OFFICE MAX 00002204
10.64 JOHN BANICK
06/12/2003
MN INS OF LEGAL EDUCATION
225.00 JOHN BANICK
06/12/2003
INVER HILLS COMMUNITY
250.00 JOHN BANICK
06/12/2003
ARREN SHOREVIEW AN HOSPT
533.52 JOHN BANICK
06/13/2003
MN PHOTO
90.63 JOHN BANICK
06/13/2003
SHRED IT
183.15 JOHN BANICK
06/09/2003
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
238.42 PAUL BARTZ
06/09/2003
ROTO ROOTER #0348
373.08 JIM BEHAN
06/11/2003
VERIZONWIRELESSWR
89.27 JIM BEHAN
06/12/2003
GRAINGER.COM 916
110.42 JIM BEHAN
06/12/2003
GRAINGER.COM 916
230.04 JIM BEHAN
06/13/2003
GCS SERVICE, INC
434.04 JIM BEHAN
06/13/2003
PAIN ENTERPRISES INC.
346.83 JIM BEHAN
06/09/2003
TARGET 00011858
30.20 RON BOURQUIN
06/10/2003
OFFICE MAX 00002204
26.27 RON BOURQUIN
06/11/2003
MENARDS OAKDALE
14.76 RON BOURQUIN
06/13/2003
TARGET 00011858
13.34 MELINDA COLEMAN
06/09/2003
KMART 00071068
99.50 LINDA CROSSON
06/09/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
-17.73 ROBERTA DARST
06/09/2003
TOTAL TOOL SUPPLY
55.11 JOHN DUCHARM E
06/11/2003
WMS WASTE MANAGEMENT
693.39 TOM EASTMAN
06/12/2003
THE STAR TRIBUNE - CIRCULAT
52.65 TOM EASTMAN
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES 006
505.80 TOM EASTMAN
06/12/2003
OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER
105.44 DOUG EDGE
06/13/2003
OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER
126.74 DOUG EDGE
06/09/2003
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
106.95 PAUL E EVERSON
06/11/2003
IPS INSIGHT PUBLIC SEC
53.23 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/09/2003
MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT IN
82.76 RONALD FREBERG
06/12/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
30.99 PATRICIA FRY
06/13/2003
ST PAUL STAMP WORKS IN
43.93 PATRICIA FRY
06/13/2003
ROSENS BAR & GRILL
13.99 RICHARD FURSMAN
06/09/2003
CUB FOODS, INC.
11.96 MIKE GRAF
06/09/2003
TARGET 00011858
48.90 MIKE GRAF
06/11/2003
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
12.80 MIKE GRAF
06/11/2003
REMAP INC
50.00 KAREN E GUILFOILE
06/13/2003
BEST BUY 00000109
106.49 KAREN E GUILFOILE
06/09/2003
MENARDS MAPLEWOOD
2.14 MARK HAAG
06/09/2003
MENARDS MAPLEWOOD
13.97 MARK HAAG
06/09/2003
MENARDS MAPLEWOOD
6.34 MARK HAAG
06/09/2003
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSP
1,069.36 LORI HANSON
06/11/2003
METRO SALES INC
801.80 LORI HANSON
06/11/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
27.62 LORI HANSON
06/09/2003
IVENUE.COM
49.99 HEIDI HERSOM
06/12/2003
STREICHER'S POLICE EQP
49.90 STEVEN HIEBERT
06/09/2003
SUN TURF
223.28 GARY HINNENKAMP
06/11/2003
SUN TURF
62.30 GARY HINNENKAMP
06/13/2003
HEJNY RENTALS INC
34.64 GARY HRJNENKANW
06/09/2003
CUB FOODS, INC.
34.96 RON HORWATH
06/09/2003
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
2.33 STEVE HURLEY
06/10/2003
KAM COM TECHNOLOGIES INC
1,646.22 STEVE HURLEY
06/12/2003
SILHOUETTE IMAGING CORP
1,746.60 STEVE HURLEY
06/13/2003
NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS
68.38 STEVE HURLEY
06/13/2003
CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137
95.84 STEVE HURLEY
7
06/13 /2003 NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS
47.66 ANN E HUTCHINSON
06/09/2003
DALCO 01 OF 01
408.10 DAVID JAHN
06/11/2003
TARGET 00011858
49.96 DAVID JAHN
06/12/2003
DALCO 01 OF 01
78.60 DAVID JAHN
06/09/2003
BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKLE
11.72 KEVIN JOHNSON
06/09/2003
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
59.59 DAVID KVAM
06/11/2003
VERIZONWIRELESSWR
56.35 SHERYL L LE
06/09/2003
FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE
51.41 MICHAEL LIDBERG
06/09/2003
CUB FOODS, INC.
35.81 STEVE LUKIN
06/11/2003
WASTE MANAGEMENT
236.40 STEVE LUKIN
06/12/2003
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
8.26 STEVE LUKIN
06/12/2003
KINKO'S #0617
126.74 STEVE LUKIN
06/12/2003
NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT CO
21.62 STEVE LUKIN
06/13/2003
NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS
766.70 STEVE LUKIN
06/09/2003
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
245.95 MARK MARUSKA
06/10/2003
SUN TURF
431.33 MARK MARUSKA
06/12/2003
AMERICAN FASTENER
36.97 MARK MARUSKA
06/13/2003
ON SITE SANITATION, IN
1,247.80 MARK MARUSKA
06/13/2003
BEACON BALLFIELDSOI OF O1
418.00 MARK MARUSKA
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES. 006
554.67 MARK MARUSKA
06/09/2003
THE HOME DEPOT 2810
8.50 JON A MELANDER
06/09/2003
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
34.01 ED NADEAU
06/11/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
122.59 JEAN NELSON
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES 006
299.05 AMY NIVEN
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES. 006
506.35 AMY NIVEN
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES 006
151.50 AMY NIVEN
06/11/2003
REMAP INC
50.00 DENNIS PECK
06/13/2003
ADT SECURITY SERVICES
277.12 PHILIP F POWELL
06/13/2003
LISPS 2663650015
7.75 PHILIP F POWELL
06/09/2003
TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
11.60 STEVEN PRIEM
06/09/2003
JOHNSON RADIO COMM
235.00 STEVEN PRIEM
06/11/2003
SUNRAY BTB
81.11 STEVEN PRIEM
06/11/2003
KATH AUTO PARTS
116.94 STEVEN PRIEM
06/12/2003
AMERICAN FASTENER
11.99 STEVEN PRIEM
06/12/2003
HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
24.03 STEVEN PRIEM
06/12/2003
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO
75.81 STEVEN PRIEM
06/13/2003
TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
56.24 STEVEN PRIEM
06/09/2003
AMOCO 07847502
7.98 KEVIN RABBETT
06/09/2003
SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LABS
1,145.31 KEVIN RABBETT
06/13/2003
NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS
1,421.35 KEVIN RABBETT
06/09/2003
FEDX CARD DELIVERY FEE
15.00 AUDRA ROBBINS
06/11/2003
WASTE MANAGEMENT
327.42 PAUL SCHLINGMAN
06/11/2003
WASTE MANAGEMENT
327.42 PAUL SCHLINGMAN
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES 006
934.60 PAUL SCHLINGMAN
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES 006
867.02 PAUL SCHLINGMAN
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES 006
392.58 PAUL SCHLINGMAN
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES 006
783.54 PAUL SCHLINGMAN
06/11/2003
ARAMARK REF SVS #6013-
166.00 RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
06/12/2003
PETSMART # 0461
27.67 RUSSELL L SCHMIDT
06/13/2003
G & K SERVICES 006
209.93 GERALD SEEGER
06/11/2003
RAPID PACKAGING
117.11 ANDREA SINDT
06/09/2003
PRECISION BUSINESS SYS
324.83 JOANNE M SVENDSEN
06/12/2003
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
439.10 JOANNE M SVENDSEN
06/09/2003
CLEARWATER TRAVEL PLAZA R
23.39 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
06/09/2003
MARATHON ASHLAND 066118
25.00 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
06/10/2003
ARROWWOOD RESORT AND CONF
4,483.36 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
06/12/2003
EXXONMOBIL26 09909706
10.48 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
06/13/2003
ASPEN MILLS, INC
179.80 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
06/09/2003
HIRSHFIELD'S MAPLEWOOD
21.06 LYLE SWANSON
06/09/2003
THE HOME DEPOT 2801
20.70 FRANK TATE
06/09/2003
THE UPS STORE #2171
11.49 DAVID J THOMALLA
06/10/2003
BATTERY ZONE
50.04 DAVID J THOMALLA
06/09/2003
QWEST COMMUNICAT R54
57.51 HOLLY URBANSKI
06/09/2003
QWEST COMMUNICAT R54
86.27 HOLLY URBANSKI
06/09/2003
QWEST COMMUNICAT R54
86.27 HOLLY URBANSKI
'Poo
06.09/2003
QWEST CONMUNICAT R54
06/09/2003
QWEST CONQvfUNICAT R54
06/09/2003
QWEST COMMUNICAT R54
06/09/2003
QWEST CONT1VtUNICAT R54
06/09/2003
QWEST CONEV[UNICAT R54
06/09/2003
QWEST COMMUNICAT R54
06/09/2003
QWESTCOMM TN505
06/13/2003
SHRED IT
06/09/2003
MENARDS MAPLEWOOD
06/09/2003
PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTI
06/12/2003
ROS RELIABLE OFFICE SU
86.27 HOLLY URBANSKI
86.27 HOLLY URBANSKI
115.02 HOLLY URBANSKI
138.45 HOLLY URBANSKI
237.67 HOLLY URBANSKI
369.20 HOLLY URBANSKI
57.51 HOLLY URBANSKI
23.31 HOLLY URBANSKI
15.96 JOSEPH WATERS
17.33 SUSAN ZWIEG
45.00 SUSAN ZWIEG
32,384.87
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
06/27/2003 10:06:08AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
61241
6/25/2003
02500
61242
6/25/2003
02500
61243
6/27/2003
00460
61244
7/1/2003
01811
61245
7/1/2003
00198
61246
7/1/2003
02834
61247
7/1/2003
02207
61248
7/1/2003
00422
61249
7/1/2003
00463
ROWEKAMP ASSOCIATES INC
ROWEKAMP ASSOCIATES INC
ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS
BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
CROMETT, MARK
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MN
DRAMA KIDS, THE
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
61250
7/1/2003
01401
FIRST STUDENT BUS COMPANY
61251
7/1/2003
02635
G -WHIZ LETTERING
61252
7/1/2003
00589
GRAF, DAVE
61253
7/1/2003
00612
GYM WORKS INC
61254
7/1/2003
02237
IMPERIAL IMPRESSIONS
61255
7/1/2003
02627
INDEPENDENT REALTY INC
61256
7/1/2003
00827
L M C I T
61257
7/1/2003
02060
LITTLE CANADA, CITY OF
61258
7/1/2003
01083
MDR A
61259
7/1/2003
00914
M W JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION
61260
7/1/2003
00932
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
61261
7/1/2003
00942
MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE CO
61262
7/1/2003
01819
MCLEOD USA
61263
7/1/2003
00966
MEDICA CHOICE
61264
7/1/2003
01085
MN LIFE INSURANCE
61265
7/1/2003
01096
MOGREN BROS
61266
7/1/2003
02836
MURRA, AARON
61267
7/1/2003
01126
NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 612001
61268
7/1/2003
02835
O'BRIEN BUILDERS LLC
61269
7/1/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
61270
7/1/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
61271
7/1/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
61272
7/1/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
61273
7/1/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
61274
7/1/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
61275
7/1/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
61276
7/1/2003
01254
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
61277
7/1/2003
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
61278
7/1/2003
01613
ROCKIN' HOLLYWOODS, THE
61279
7/1/2003
02192
SCHINDELDECKER, JIM
61280
7/1/2003
01455
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
61281
7/1/2003
02837
SIEDENBURG, DEBRA
61282
7/1/2003
02515
ST CROIX LESSON CENTER
Description /Account
"CRIME VIEW" GIS MAPPING SOFTWEA
"CRIME VIEW" GIS MAPPING SOFTWAR
PROJ 03 -02 CL3 CONCRETE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MONTHLY WATER UTIL BILL DATE 6/20
REIMB MEALS & MILEAGE 6/5 TO 6/8
MONTHLY PREMIUM
DRAMA CLASSES - JUN
REPAIR AMB MEDIC VEHICLE
REPAIR AMB MEDIC 2 VEHICLE
REPAIR TANKER 4
BUS FEE TO MPLS INST OF ARTS 6/11
UNIFORMS
KARATE INSTRUCTOR
GYM EQUIPMENT MAINT - JUN
AMBULANCE REPORT BOOKS
REF GRADING ESC - 2270 TILSEN CT E
W/C PREM -1ST INSTALLMENT
YTH BASKETBALL GYM RENTAL
MDRA MEMBERSHIP
REF MW JOHNSON - 2533 HALLER LN E
MERCH FOR RESALE
BIRTHDAY CAKES
BIRTHDAY CAKES
BIRTHDAY CAKES
BIRTHDAY CAKES
CLEAN UP BASEMENT - SEWER BACK U
LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 5/16 - 6/15
MONTHLY PREMIUM
MONTHLY PREMIUM
DIRT
REIMB VEH ALLOW & MILEAGE 6/9 - 13
REIMB VEH ALLOW & MILEAGE 6/16 - 22
PERA LIFE INS (P /R DEDUCTED IN JUN
REF GRADING ESC - 1415 CO RD C E
REF WINIFRED JOHNSON - AMB 030061
REF SHANE COLLIER - SWIM LESSONS
REF ST JOHNS - GROUP OVERPAID
REF SCOTT ANDERSON - MEMBERSHI
REF TAMMI WILHELMY- T -BALL
REF MIKE THEISSEN - SOCCER
REF JEANINE ENGWER - TBALL
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MUSIC JULY 4TH - FINAL PYMT
REIMB FOR SAFETY BOOTS
REIMB MEALS & PARKING 6/14 - 6/20
REF GRADING ESC - 2697 PINKSPIRE L
MCC PROGRAM HORSE CAMP
Amount
5,987.50
10,109.98
233.10
156.00
195.00
117.00
1,088.44
243.68
7,789.40
875.00
2,303.80
1,398.96
617.77
159.00
472.00
217.75
631.00
786.78
1,026.30
39,620.75
942.00
414.00
3,278.08
378.93
155.50
76.25
137.25
61.00
70.29
2,556.77
91,678.39
3,426.15
47.93
40.70
43.10
245.00
1,022.33
520.18
98.00
50.40
42.00
35.00
28.00
25.00
291.20
115.20
156.40
245.11
401.60
1,000.00
119.99
37.28
1,017.40
1,140.00
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
06/27/2003 10:06:08AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
61283 7/1/2003 01546
61284 7/1/2003 01574
SUBURBAN SPORTSWEAR LLC
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
61285
7/1/2003
01580
TSE, INC.
61286
7/1/2003
01698
UNITED WAY OF THE ST. PAUL
61287
7/1/2003
02203
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LTD
61288
7/1/2003
02290
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - STD
61289
7/1/2003
00592
W W GRAINGER INC
61290
7/1/2003
01734
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
61291
7/1/2003
01750
WATSON CO INC, THE
61292
7/1/2003
01764
WESTLING, TOM
61293
7/1/2003
02838
WHITE, JOEL A
61294
7/1/2003
01924
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC
61295
7/1/2003
01805
ZI EGLER INC.
Description /Account Amount
TS H I RTS
146.95
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS NO
30.00
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS NO
471.70
PROJ 02 -03 RECYCLED BASE
253.61
RECYCLED BASE
67.98
JANITORIAL SRVS 4/17 - 5/14
675.17
QUARTERLY PAYMENT
654.00
MONTHLY PREMIUM
2,890.97
SHORT -TERM DISABILITY - JUL
1,186.35
JAWS FOR VICE
10.46
COMM PLUMBING INSP
531.20
MERCH FOR RESALE
207.51
TENNIS INSTRUCTOR THRU 6/26
993.75
REIMB MEALS & MILEAGE 6/5 - 6/8
175.60
PROF DESIGN SRVS AFTON HTS PARK
3,278.00
PROJ 03 -02 RENT TRACTOR
969.15
55 Checks in this report Total checks : 1969468.04
4 4
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date
Date
Payee
Description
Amount
06/19/03
06/20/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
17,839.07
06/20/03
06/20/03
ICMA (Vantagepointe)
Deferred Compensation
7,110.31
06/19/03
06/20/03
DCRP /Flex account
DCRP & Flex plan payments
879.90
06/06/03
06/20/03
MN Dept of Revenue
Fuel Tax
235.00
06/19/03
06/20/03
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
1
06/20/03
06/23/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
6
06/20/03
06/23/03
U.S. Treasurer
Federal Payroll Tax
87,764.66
06/20/03
06/23/03
P.E. R.A.
P.E. R.A.
47,589.95
06/23/03
06/24/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
10,733.80
06/20/03
06/24/03
MN State Treasurer
State Payroll Tax
17,294.60
06/23/03
06/24/03
Pitney Bowes
Postage
3
06/20/03
06/24/03
Orchard Trust
Deferred Compensation
19,585.00
06/24/03
06/25/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
14,482.33
06/25/03
06/26/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
17,311.09
TOTAL
251,389.72
12
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
07/3/2003 11:04:12AM City of- Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
61296
7/8/2003
00014
AT&T
AT &T MANAGED INTERNET SERVICE
6,009.78
61297
7/8/2003
01908
ADMINISTRATION, DEPT OF
MAINFRAME PROCESSOR CHRGS - MA
745.13
DATA PROCESSING - MAY
392.00
61.298
7/8/2003
02106
ADVANCED BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC
TYPEWRITER ANNUAL MAINT
776.00
PRINTER REPAIR
75.00
61299
7/8/2003
01809
AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES
12.39 TONS RIPRAP III
273.80
61300
7/8/2003
00110
ANDREWS, SCOTT
REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS
662.63
61301
7/8/2003
00171
BEHAN, JAMES
REIMB BOILER LIC & MILEAGE 1/30 - 6/
54.42
61302
7/8/2003
01811
BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC
MERCH FOR RESALE
78.00
61303
7/8/2003
00186
BEST SOFTWARE, INC.
ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
19007.94
61304
7/8/2003
00198
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
WATER UTIL - BILL DATE 6/26
153.04
61305
7/8/2003
00384
DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS
COPYING COSTS
326.54
61306
7/8/2003
00422
DRAMA KIDS, THE
DRAMA KIDS INSTRUCTOR
1,075.00
61307
7/8/2003
00463
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT
REPAIR RESCUE VEHICLE 3
233.89
61308
7/8/2003
00494
FAMILY SERVICE INC
YTH DIVERSION REST PROG - 1ST QTR
10,270.25
61309
7/8/2003
02839
GROVER, MICHAEL
REIMBURSE FOR BOOTS
60.00
61310
7/8/2003
00721
INDEPENDENT SPORTS NETWORK
SCHEDULE ADULT SOFTBALL UMPIRES
21293.50
61311
7/8/2003
00708
IPMA MN CHAPTER ADMIN
2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES & TRNG
30.00
61312
7/8/2003
00785
KAMCOM TECHNOLOGIES
PC'S 2.4 GHZ, DUAL 80GB HD, RAID, 128
39860.63
61313
7/8/2003
00908
M R P A
ADULT STATE SOFTBALL TOURN
520.00
61314
7/8/2003
01819
MCLEOD USA
DSL SERVICE TO REMOTE SITES
704.97
61315
7/8/2003
00982
METRO FIRE INC
TNT RESCUE SYSTEM
149961.16
61316
7/8/2003
00985
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
WASTEWATER - JULY
158,600.00
61317
7/8/2003
01028
MN STATE TREASURER STAX
MONTHLY SURTAX - JUN
3,936 .98
61318
7/8/2003
02836
MURRA, AARON
REIMB FOR VEH & MILEAGE 6/23 - 6/29
46.77
61319
7/8/2003
01147
NATL REGISTRY OF EMT
EMT FIRE & POLICE TEST
120.00
61320
7/8/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF CAROLYN EICKLOFF - MCC PROG
98.00
61321
7/8/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF JANET HARTMANN - MCC PROG
49.00
.61322
7/8/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF MAYLEE XIONG - MEMBERSHIP
45.00
61323
7/8/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF JOHN STACKPOLE - MCC PROG
36.00
61324.
7/8/2003
01941
PATRICK GRAPHICS & TROPHIES
LEAGUE - 1ST RESIN OVALS
1,081.19
61325
7/8/2003
01254
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
MERCH FOR RESALE
590.20
MERCH FOR RESALE
285.30
61326
70'
01284
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE - NEWSLETTER
10,000.00
0
61327
7/8/2003
01289
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC
STUMP REMOVAL AT PRAIRIE FARM
409.03
61328
7/3/2003
00390
PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
INTOXILYZER RECERTIFICATION
40.00
61.329
702008
01337
RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
DATA PROCESSING -MAY
3,550.00
61.330
7/8
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
MERCH FOR RESALE
270.08
6
7/8/2003
02178
RIDLEHOOVER, KATIE
REIMB PROG SUPPLY & MILES 6/19 - 7/1
58.18
6.1.332
7/8/2003
01387
ROSSINI, DR. JAMES
FITNESS PROG CONSULTING FEE - JUN
100.0 0
61333
7/8/2003
01418
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
COFFEE & SUPPLIES
181.67
CAMP SUPPLIES
188.43
CAMP SUPPLIES
157.50
MERCH FOR RESALE
173.14
MERCH FOR RESALE
184.59
VENDING MACHINE SNACKS
143.31
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
205.61
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
147.38
MERCH FOR RESALE
117.50
MERCH FOR RESALE
217.37
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
242.33
61334,
7/8/2003
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
CRIME LAB FEES - MAY
120.00
PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES
251.28
61335
7/8/2003
01550
SUMMIT INSPECTIONS
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR
3,323.20
vchlist
Check Register
Page: 2
07/0.3/2003 11:04:12AM
City of Maplewood
.a
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
61336
718/2003
01572
SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.
INK CARTRIDGES
364.55
INK CARTRIDGE
380.55
INK CARTRIDGES & RIBBONS
163.97
INK CARTRIDGE
429.83
INK CARTRIDGE
226.76
INK CARTRIDGES
92.27
61337
7/8/2003
01574
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS NO
2
PROJ 03 -02 RECYCLED BASE
368.38
61338
7/8/2003
01669
TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT &
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
216.18
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
79.88
TOW RESCUE 3 VEHICLE
213.00
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
79.88
TOW POLICE VEHICLE
37.28
61339
7/8/2003
01704
URBANSKI, HOLLY
REPLENISH PETTY CASH
259.93
61340
7/8/2003
02464
US BANK
PAYING AGENT FEE
201.25
61341
7/8/2003
01482
VEESENMEYER, DANIEL G
NEW SURFACE FOR SOCCER GOAL AD
750.00
61342
7/8/2003
01734
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
700.51
61343
7/8/2003
01750
WATSON CO INC, THE
MERCH FOR RESALE
403.70
61344
7/8/2003
01771
WHITE BEAR LAKE, CITY OF
TACTICAL RISK MGMT SEMINAR
150.00
61345
7/8/2003
02516
WILHELM, MELISSA
REIMBURSE FOR SWIMSUIT
53.90
61346
7/8/2003
01789
WOODBURY, CITY OF
EMT CLASS - 5 STUDENTS
3
EMT TRAINING CLASS
780.00
51
Checks in this report
Total chocks:
2419788.24
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date
Date
Payee
Description
Amount
06/26/03
06/27/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
8 9 524650
06/20/03
06/27/03
WI Dept of Revenue
State Payroll Tax
1
06/26/03
.06/27/03.
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
1
06/27/03
06/30/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
14
06/30/03
07/01/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
23
07!01/03
07/02/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
26
TOTAL
75
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
16
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
06/20/03
COLLINS, KENNETH
357.47
dd
06/20/03
JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
357.47
dd
06/20/03
KOPPEN, MARVIN
3 5 7.47
dd
06/20/03
COLEMAN, MELINDA
3,682.46
dd
06/20/03
DARST, ROBERTA
1
dd
06/20/03
FURSMAN, RICHARD
4,63 8.25
dd
06/20/03
SCHLINGMAN, PAUL
2,026.22
dd
06/20/03
SEEGER, GERALD
496.12
dd
06/20/03
SWANSON, LYLE
1,566.15
dd
06/20/03
EDSON, KAREN
643.75
dd
06/20/03
LE, SHERYL
3
dd
06/20/03
RAMEAUX, THERESE
2,133.34
dd
06/20/03
FAUST, DANIEL
3
dd
06/20/03
URBANSKI, HOLLY
1,661.45
dd
06/20/03
ANDERSON, CAROLE
937.39
dd
06/20/03
BADMAN, GAYLE
2,869.17
dd
06/20/03
JACKSON, MARY
1,715.85
dd
06/20/03
KELSEY, CONNIE
722.76
dd
06/20/03
TETZLAFF, JUDY
1
dd
06/20/03
FRY, PATRICIA
1
dd
06/20/03
GUILFOILE, KAREN
2,546.16
dd
06/20/03
OSTER, ANDREA
1
dd
06/20/03
CAROE, JEANETTE
1,629.92
dd
06/20/03
JAGOE, CAROL
1
dd
06/20/03
JOHNSON, BONNIE
935.99
dd
06/20/03
OLSON, SANDRA
1,056.03
dd
06/20/03
WEAVER, KRISTINE
1,590.22
dd
06/20/03
BANICK, JOHN
3
dd
06/20/03
CORCORAN, THERESA
1
dd
06/20/03
MARTINSON, CAROL
1,538.95
dd
06/20/03
POWELL, PHILIP
1
dd
06/20/03
SPANGLER, EDNA
341.00
dd
06/20/03
THOMALLA, DAVID
3
dd
06/20/03
ABEL, CLINT
1,770.83
dd
06/20/03
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2,279.96
dd
06/20/03
ANDREWS, SCOTT
3
dd
06/20/03
BAKKE, LONN
2
dd
06/20/03
BELDE, STANLEY
2,514.47
dd
06/20/03
BIERDEMAN, BRIAN
1,988.91
dd
06/20/03
BOHL, JOHN
3,084.74
dd
06/20/03
BUSACK, DANIEL
2,115.21
dd
06/20/03
COFFEY, KEVIN
1
dd
06/20/03
DOBLAR, RICHARD
2
dd
06/20/03
HALWEG, KEVIN
3
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
17
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
06/20/03
HEINZ, STEPHEN
2
dd
06/20/03
HIEBERT, STEVEN
2,531.47
dd
06/20/03
JOHNSON, KEVIN
3
dd
06/20/03
KARIS, FLINT
2
dd
06/20/03
KONG, TOMMY
2,134.63
dd
06/20/03
KROLL, BRETT
1,801.89
dd
06/20/03
KVAM, DAVID
2
dd
06/20/03
LARSON, DANIEL
2,115.21
dd
06/20/03
LU, JOHNNIE
2
dd
06/20/03
MARINO, JASON
1,700.93
dd
06/20/03
MARTIN, JERROLD
2
dd
06/20/03
METRY, ALESIA
1
dd
06/20/03
PALMA, STEVEN
2
dd
06/20/03
RABBETT, KEVIN
2
dd
06/20/03
STEFFEN, SCOTT
2
dd
06/20/03
STOCKTON, DERRELL
21301.63
dd
06/20/03
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2,396.87
dd
06/20/03
THIENES, PAUL
2,779.49
dd
06/20/03
TRAN, JOSEPH
2,399.89
dd
06/20/03
WENZEL, JAY
2
dd
06/20/03
XIONG, KAO
1
dd
06/20/03
BARTZ, PAUL
2,511.59
dd
06/20/03
BERGERON, JOSEPH
3
dd
06/20/03
CROTTY, KERRY
2,553.53
dd
06/20/03
DUGAS, MICHAEL
1,878.78
dd
06/20/03
DUNN, ALICE
2
dd
06/20/03
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2
dd
06/20/03
EVERSON, PAUL
1,677.45
dd
06/20/03
FLOR, TIMOTHY
3,317.29
dd
06/20/03
FRASER, JOHN
2
dd
06/20/03
HALWEG, JODI
1,592.75
dd
06/20/03
KATZMAN, BARBARA
1,702.75
dd
06/20/03
OLSON, JULIE
2
dd
06/20/03
PARSONS, KURT
108.89
dd
06/20/03
PIKE, GARY
2
dd
06/20/03
ROSSMAN, DAVID
2,301.89
dd
06/20/03
DAWSON, RICHARD
1,628.85
dd
06/20/03
DUELLMAN, KIRK
1
dd
06/20/03
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
1,628.85
dd
06/20/03
NOVAK, JEROME
1
dd
06/20/03
PETERSON, ROBERT
1
dd
06/20/03
SVENDSEN, RONALD
1
dd
06/20/03
GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE
2,429.15
dd
06/20/03
BOYER, SCOTT
1,780.74
dd
06/20/03
FEHR, JOSEPH
1
dd
06/20/03
FLAUGHER, JAYME
2
17
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
06/20/03
LAFFERTY, WALTER
1,756.65
dd
06/20/03
LINN, BRYAN
2,023.90
dd
06/20/03
PACOLT, MARSHA
1,999.85
dd
06/20/03
RABINE, JANET
1
dd
06/20/03
SCHAULS, ADAM
680.00
dd
06/20/03
SCHWARTZBAUER, LINDA
425.00
dd
06/20/03
STAHNKE, JULIE
2,087.85
dd
06/20/03
LUKIN, STEVEN
3,115.54
dd
06/20/03
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
2,599.72
dd
06/20/03
ZWIEG, SUSAN
1,661.45
dd
06/20/03
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
268.49
dd
06/20/03
AHL, R. CHARLES
3
dd
06/20/03
NIVEN, AMY
1
dd
06/20/03
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
2,391.25
dd
06/20/03
WEGWERTH, JUDITH
1,666.06
dd
06/20/03
BRINK, TROY
1,524.66
dd
06/20/03
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
1
dd
06/20/03
EDGE, DOUGLAS
1,776.51
dd
06/20/03
KANE, MICHAEL
2
dd
06/20/03
LUTZ, DAVID
2,332.31
dd
06/20/03
MEYER, GERALD
1
dd
06/20/03
NAGEL, BRYAN
2
dd
06/20/03
OSWALD, ERICK
2
dd
06/20/03
TEVLIN, TODD
1
dd
06/20/03
BOHMBACH, JOSHUA
885.50
dd
06/20/03
CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER
2
dd
06/20/03
DUCHARME, JOHN
2
dd
06/20/03
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,460.27
dd
06/20/03
PECK, DENNIS
2
dd
06/20/03
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
2,782.60
dd
06/20/03
SCHACHT, ERIN
2
dd
06/20/03
TATE, FRANK
1
dd
06/20/03
VERMEERSCH, CHARLES
1,912.65
dd
06/20/03
ANDERSON, BRUCE
3
dd
06/20/03
DOHERTY, KATHLEEN
1,666.06
dd
06/20/03
HERSOM, HEIDI
1
dd
06/20/03
BORGLUM, DUSTIN
1,212.00
dd
06/20/03
MARUSKA, MARK
2,439.86
dd
06/20/03
NAUGHTON, JOHN
1,502.25
dd
06/20/03
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
1,734.25
dd
06/20/03
BIESANZ, OAKLEY
1,231.24
dd
06/20/03
HAYMAN, JANET
1
dd
06/20/03
HUTCHINSON, ANN
2,031.16
dd
06/20/03
KOS, HEATHER
585.00
dd
06/20/03
NELSON, JEAN
980.51
dd
06/20/03
FOERG, ELIZABETH
1,239.38
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
19
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
06/20/03
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
2,412.25
dd
06/20/03
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
2,558.52
dd
06/20/03
KROLL, LISA
1,016.20
dd
06/20/03
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE
923.37
dd
06/20/03
SINDT, ANDREA
1,439.85
dd
06/20/03
THOMPSON, DEBRA
614.66
dd
06/20/03
YOUNG, TAMELA
1,278.25
dd
06/20/03
FIT;WALL, SHANN
1,968.65
dd
06/20/03
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2,274.25
dd
06/20/03
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2,346.15
dd
06/20/03
FISHER, DAVID
2,794.18
dd
06/20/03
RICE, MICHAEL
960.00
dd
06/20/03
SWAN, DAVID
1,415.05
dd
06/20/03
KONEWKO, DUWAYNE
2,211.05
dd
06/20/03
ANZALDI, MANDY
882.00
dd
06/20/03
BJORK, BRANDON
348.00
dd
06/20/03
FINN, GREGORY
1,862.74
dd
06/20/03
FLUG, ELAINE
37.00
dd
06/20/03
GAETZ, HOLLY
70.00
dd
06/20/03 l
GERVAIS, DAVID
654.50
dd
06/20/03
GRAF, MICHAEL
1
dd
06/20/03
KELLY, LISA
1,255.12
dd
06/20/03
NIEMCZYK, BRIAN
40.00
dd
06/20/03
PETERS, TRISHA
517.50
dd
06/20/03
ROBBINS, AUDRA
1,731.22
dd
06/20/03
STROBEL, JESSICA
145.00
dd
06/20/03
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,562.64
dd
06/20/03
ZIELINSKI, JOSEPH
15.00
dd
06/20/03
BREHEIM, ROGER
1,738.86
dd
06/20/03
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
1,734.25
dd
06/20/03
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
2
dd
06/20/03
CROSSON, LINDA
2
dd
06/20/03
DIAZ, SUSAN
454.76
dd
06/20/03
EASTMAN, THOMAS
2
dd
06/20/03
ERICKSON, KYLE
789.90
dd
06/20/03
PARTLOW, JOSHUA
250.44
dd
06/20/03
PELOQUIN, PENNYE
359.06
dd
06/20/03
RIDLEHOOVER, KATE
102.64
dd
06/20/03
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
1
dd
06/20/03
STAPLES, PAULINE
2,641.74
dd
06/20/03
ABR.AHAMSON, DANIEL
96.60
dd
06/20/03
ABR.AHAMSON, REBECCA
310.08
dd
06/20/03
BENDTSEN, LISA
45.00
dd
06/20/03
BRENEMAN, NEIL
482.20
dd
06/20/03
CORNER, AMY
64.80
dd
06/20/03
FONTAINE, ANTHONY
751.21
19
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
20
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
06/20/03
GUZIK, JENNIFER
56.51
dd
06/20/03
HALEY, BROOKE
255.13
dd
06/20/03
HORWATH, RONALD
1,648.82
dd
06/20/03
IRISH, GRACE
207.96
dd
06/20/03
IRISH, KARL
262.94
dd
06/20/03
KOEHNEN, AMY
20.55
dd
06/20/03
KOEHNEN, MARY
437.32
dd
06/20/03
KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
457.18
dd
06/20/03
LAWSON, JOSHUA
179.50
dd
06/20/03
MARUSKA, ERICA
3 5.20
dd
06/20/03
POWERS, JESSICA
89.40
dd
06/20/03
SCHAEFER, ROB
36.25
dd
06/20/03
SIMONSON, JUSTIN
18.80
dd
06/20/03
THOEMKE, MARIE
173.88
dd
06/20/03
GROPPOLI, LINDA
238.00
dd
06/20/03
RENSLOW, RITA
264.83
dd
06/20/03
CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND
159.85
dd
06/20/03
LONETTI, JAMES
891.28
dd
06/20/03
PATTERS ON, ALBERT
94 8.3 6
dd
06/20/03
PRINS, KELLY
848.29
dd
06/20/03
REILLY, MICHAEL
1
dd
06/20/03
STEINHORST, JEFFREY
640.15
dd
06/20/03
AICHELE, CRAIG
1,749.13
dd
06/20/03
PRIEM, STEVEN
1
dd
06/20/03
BERGO, CHAD
1
dd
06/20/03
FOWLDS, MYCHAL
1
dd
06/20/03
HURLEY, STEPHEN
2,687.06
Wf
93833
06/20/03
CARDINAL, ROBERT
406.20
Wf
93834
06/20/03
WASILUK, JULIE
357.47
Wf
93835
06/20/03
INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS
100.00
Wf
93836
06/20/03
JAHN, DAVID
1
Wf
93837
06/20/03
MALDONADO, JUANA
658.71
Wf
93838
06/20/03
MORIN, TROY
187.00
Wf
93839
06/20/03
MATHEYS, ALANA
1
Wf
93 840
06/20/03
GENNOW, PAMELA
819.00
Wf
93 841
06/20/03
HANSEN, LORI
1
Wf
93842
06/20/03
VIETOR, LORRAINE
1,742.69
Wf
93843
06/20/03
PALANK, MARY
1,536.65
Wf
93844
06/20/03
RICHIE, CAROLE
1,569.25
Wf
93845
06/20/03
SVENDSEN, JOANNE
1,731.17
Wf
93 846
06/20/03
TICHY, PAMELA
54.00
Wf
93847
06/20/03
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
3,539.02
Wf
93848
06/20/03
STEINER, JOSEPH
489.00
Wf
93849
06/20/03
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2,301.63
Wf
93850
06/20/03
FREBERG, RONALD
2,082.84
Wf
93851
06/20/03
HAAG, ROBERT
340.00
20
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
21
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
93852
06/20/03
JONES, DONALD
1,701.45
Wf
93853
06/20/03
STEWART, RYAN
340.00
Wf
93854
06/20/03
ELIAS, JAMES
2,218.68
Wf
93855
06/20/03
JAROSCH, JONATHAN
858.45
Wf
93856
06/20/03
MURRA, AARON
1
Wf
93857
06/20/03
EDSON, DAVID
1
Wf
93858
06/20/03
HELEY, ROLAND
1
Wf
93859
06/20/03
HINNENKAMP, GARY
1,752.61
Wf
93860
06/20/03
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1,736.55
Wf
93861
06/20/03
NAUGHTON, RYAN
1
Wf
93862
06/20/03
NIEMCZYK, ANTHONY
736.00
Wf
93863
06/20/03
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1
Wf
93864
06/20/03
BERGREN, KIRSTEN
33.00
Wf
93865
06/20/03
GERNES, CAROLE
643.75
Wf
93866
06/20/03
SOUTTER, CHRISTINE
229.50
Wf
93867
06/20/03
ANZALDI, KALI
370.00
Wf
93868
06/20/03
BALLESTRAZZE, THAD
420.00
Wf
93 869
06/20/03
BOTHWELL, KRISTIN
292.00
Wf
93870
06/20/03
DEGREE, AMANDA
89.25
Wf
93871
06/20/03
FRANK, LAURA
640.53
Wf
93872
06/20/03
GEBHARD, JILLIAN
498.25
Wf
93873
06/20/03
GOODRICH, CHAD
301.75
Wf
93874
06/20/03
HOIUM, PHILIP
116.00
Wf
93 875
06/20/03
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
618.24
Wf
93876
06/20/03
PETERSON, TYLER
556.00
Wf
93 877
06/20/03
SHOBERG, KARI
134.00
Wf
93 878
06/20/03
UNGAR, KRISTOPHER
60.00
Wf
93879
06/20/03
WERNER, KATIE
575.00
Wf
93880
06/20/03
YOUNG, SHAWN
384.63
Wf
93881
06/20/03
GERMAIN, DAVID
1
Wf
93882
06/20/03
HAAG, MARK
1,587.85
Wf
93883
06/20/03
NADEAU, EDWARD
2,643.39
Wf
93884
06/20/03
BEHR, HEATHER
223.90
Wf
93885
06/20/03
BROWN, LAURIE
414.40
Wf
93886
06/20/03
DISKERUD, HEATHER
150.15
Wf
93887
06/20/03
GLASS, JEAN
1
Wf
93888
06/20/03
MAROUSHEK, KRISTIN
47.16
Wf
93889
06/20/03
MOY, PAMELA
418.54
Wf
93890
06/20/03
SHOBERG, CARY
753.67
Wf
93 891
06/20/03
TOLBERT, FRANCINE
51.80
Wf
93892
06/20/03
LINGER, MARGARET
482.32
Wf
93893
06/20/03
ANDERSON, CALEB
208.93
Wf
93894
06/20/03
BACHMAN, NICOLE
321.10
Wf
93 895
06/20/03
CHAPMAN, JENNY
317.43
Wf
93896
06/20/03
COSTA, JOSEPH
132.28
Wf
93897
06/20/03
DEMPSEY, BETH
86.40
21
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
22
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
93898
06/20/03
DIERICH, ANDREA
37.95
Wf
93899
06/20/03
DOTY, JANET
327.35
Wf
93900
06/20/03
DUNK, RYAN
587.10
Wf
93901
06/20/03
FALKENSTEIN, MONICA
13.70
Wf
93902
06/20/03
FENGER, JUSTIN
282.82
Wf
93903
06/20/03
FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA
15.90
Wf
93904
06/20/03
FINNEGAN, KAREN
72.00
Wf
93905
06/20/03
FONTAINE, KIM
402.20
Wf
93906
06/20/03
FRETZ, SARAH
576.95
Wf
93907
06/20/03
GRANT, MELISSA
34.39
Wf
93908
06/20/03
GRUENHAGEN, LINDA
287.95
Wf
93909
06/20/03
HEINN, REBECCA
106.63
Wf
93910
06/20/03
HOLMGREN, LEAH
513.29
Wf
93911
06/20/03
HOULE, DENISE
215.50
Wf
93912
06/20/03
HUPPERT, ERIN
116.63
Wf
93913
06/20/03
JOHNSON, ROBERT
326.61
Wf
93914
06/20/03
JOHNSON, ROLLAND
14.50
Wf
93915
06/20/03
JOHNSON, STETSON
160.99
Wf
93916
06/20/03
JOYER, MARTI
106.93
Wf
93917
06/20/03
KERSCHNER, JOLENE
318.33
Wf
93918
06/20/03
LINDSTROM, AMANDA
94.25
Wf
93919
06/20/03
MATHISEN -JR, DEAN
163.65
Wf
93920
06/20/03
MCMAHON, MELISSA
324.70
Wf
93921
06/20/03
MELCHER, ROBERT
47.95
Wf
93922
06/20/03
MILLS, ANNE
34.50
Wf
93923
06/20/03
MOSSONG, ANDREA
549.73
Wf
93924
06/20/03
O'REAGAN, CHRISTINE
72.63
Wf
93925
06/20/03
OLSON, MARGRET
85.00
Wf
93926
06/20/03
OWEN, JONATHAN
99.50
Wf
93927
06/20/03
PEHOSKI, JOEL
401.23
Wf
93928
06/20/03
PROESCH, ANDY
283.73
Wf
93929
06/20/03
RENSTROM, KEVIN
102.75
Wf
93930
06/20/03
SMITLEY, SHARON
222.00
Wf
93931
06/20/03
TUPY, HEIDE
93.50
Wf
93932
06/20/03
TUPY, MARCUS
228.05
Wf
93933
06/20/03
WAGNER, ERIC
96.80
Wf
93934
06/20/03
WARNER, CAROLYN
88.80
Wf
93935
06/20/03
WEDES, CARYL
129.90
Wf
93936
06/20/03
WELTER, ELIZABETH
470.50
Wf
93937
06/20/03
WHITE, NICOLE
174.83
Wf
93938
06/20/03
WHITE, TIMOTHY
241.80
Wf
93939
06/20/03
WOODMAN, ALICE
40.00
Wf
93940
06/20/03
BOSLEY, CAROL
247.35
Wf
93941
06/20/03
BREITBACH, GARY
556.50
Wf
93942
06/20/03
ESALA, HOPE
56.88
Wf
93943
06/20/03
FARLEY, JAMIE
203.00
22
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
23
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
93944
06/20/03
GLASS, GILLIAN
342.50
Wf
93945
06/20/03
HAGSTROM, EMILY
37.50
Wf
93946
06/20/03
HANSEN, ANNA
56.00
Wf
93947
06/20/03
KURKOSKI, STEPHANIE
24.38
Wf
93948
06/20/03
NORLIN, AMANDA
52.50
Wf
93949
06/20/03
ODDEN, JESSICA
133.50
Wf
93950
06/20/03
OIE, REBECCA
7.50
Wf
93951
06/20/03
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
187.00
Wf
93952
06/20/03
VAN HALE, PAULA
48.75
Wf
93953
06/20/03
BEHAN, JAMES
1,590.15
Wf
93954
06/20/03
CHIGINSKY, APRIL
46.55
Wf
93955
06/20/03
COLLINS, ASHLEY
159.85
Wf
93956
06/20/03
DOBLAR, STEVE
73.15
Wf
93957
06/20/03
DOUGLASS, TOM
1,173.26
Wf
93958
06/20/03
JAMES, JANET
63.50
Wf
93959
06/20/03
KYRK, ASHLEY
192.00
Wf
93960
06/20/03
LOGAN, HEATHER
111.20
Wf
93961
06/20/03
PETERSON, LYNDSAY
28.60
Wf
93962
06/20/03
SARPONG, SEAN
433.15
Wf
93963
06/20/03
SCHULZE, BRIAN
272.00
Wf
93964
06/20/03
SEVERSON, HOLLY
89.78
Wf
93965
06/20/03
YOUNG, MATTHEW
29.00
Wf
93966
06/20/03
ZIEMER, NICOLE
191.80
Wf
93967
06/20/03
MULVANEY, DENNIS
1
420,881.28
23
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
24
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
07/03/03
COLLINS, KENNETH
357.47
dd
07/03/03
JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
357.47
dd
07/03/03
KOPPEN, MARVIN
357.47
dd
07/03/03
COLEMAN, MELINDA
3,857.46
dd
07/03/03
DARST, ROBERTA
1,386.79
dd
07/03/03
FURSMAN, RICHARD
4
dd
07/03/03
SCHLINGMAN, PAUL
2
dd
07/03/03
SEEGER, GERALD
496.12
dd
07/03/03
SWANSON, LYLE
1,566.15
dd
07/03/03
EDSON, KAREN
731.25
dd
07/03/03
LE, SHERYL
3,717.64
dd
07/03/03
RAMEAUX, THERESE
2
dd
07/03/03
FAUST, DANIEL
3
dd
07/03/03
URBANSKI, HOLLY
1,661.45
dd
07/03/03
ANDERSON, CAROLE
930.27
dd
07/03/03
BAUMAN, GAYLE
2
dd
07/03/03
JACKSON, MARY
1,715.85
dd
07/03/03
KELSEY, CONNIE
728.20
dd
07/03/03
TETZLAFF, JUDY
1,683.05
dd
07/03/03
FRY, PATRICIA
1,592.65
dd
07/03/03
GUILFOILE, KAREN
2
dd
07/03/03
OSTER, ANDREA
1
dd
07/03/03
CAROE, JEANETTE
108.44
dd
07/03/03
JAGOE, CAROL
1
dd
07/03/03
JOHNSON, BONNIE
970.97
dd
07/03/03
OLSON, SANDRA
1,242.63
dd
07/03/03
WEAVER, KRISTINE
1,583.03
dd
07/03/03
BANICK, JOHN
3
dd
07/03 /03
CORCORAN, THERESA
1,585.85
dd
07/03/03
MARTINSON, CAROL
1,538.95
dd
07/03/03
POWELL, PHILIP
1,993.26
dd
07/03/03
SPANGLER, EDNA
308.00
dd
07/03/03
THOMALLA, DAVID
3
dd
07/03/03
ABEL, CLINT
1
dd
07/03/03
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2
dd
07/03/03
ANDREWS, SCOTT
3,038.96
dd
07/03/03
BAKKE, LONN
2,595.47
dd
07/03/03
BELDE, STANLEY
2,524.67
dd
07/03/03
BIERDEMAN, BRIAN
1,794.13
dd
07/03/03
BOHL, JOHN
2,428.62
dd
07/03/03
BUSACK, DANIEL
2
dd
07/03/03
COFFEY, KEVIN
1,561.75
dd
07/03/03
DOBLAR, RICHARD
2
dd
07/03/03
HALWEG, KEVIN
2
24
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
25
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
07/03/03
HEINZ, STEPHEN
2,470.94
dd
07/03/03
HIEBERT, STEVEN
2
dd
07/03/03
JOHNSON, KEVIN
3,203.17
dd
07/03/03
KARIS, FLINT
2
dd
07/03/03
KONG, TOMMY
2,144.34
dd
07/03/03
KROLL, BRETT
1,755.28
dd
07/03/03
KVAM, DAVID
2,832.91
dd
07/03/03
LARSON, DANIEL
2
dd
07/03/03
LU, JOHNNIE
2
dd
07/03/03
MARINO, JASON
1,825.29
dd
07/03/03
MARTIN, JERROLD
1,925.55
dd
07/03/03
METRY, ALESIA
1
dd
07/03/03
PALMA, STEVEN
2,467.35
dd
07/03/03
RABBETT, KEVIN
2,945.80
dd
07/03/03
STEFFEN, SCOTT
3
dd
07/03/03
STOCKTON, DERRELL
2
dd
07/03/03
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2
dd
07/03/03
THIENES, PAUL
2,384.48
dd
07/03/03
TRAN, JOSEPH
2,291.17
dd
07/03/03
WENZEL, JAY
2,183.17
dd
07/03/03
XIONG, KAO
1,716.46
dd
07/03/03
BARTZ, PAUL
2,658.38
dd
07/03/03
BERGERON, JOSEPH
2
dd
07/03/03
GROTTY, KERRY
2
dd
07/03/03
DUGAS, MICHAEL
1,920.05
dd
07/03/03
DUNK, ALICE
2,713.66
dd
07/03/03
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2,384.48
dd
07/03/03
EVERSON, PAUL
1
dd
07/03/03
FLOR, TIMOTHY
2,757.55
dd
07/03/03
FRASER, JOHN
2
dd
07/03/03
HALWEG, JODI
1
dd
07/03/03
KATZMAN, BARBARA
1
dd
07/03/03
OLSON, JULIE
2, 177.35
dd
07/03/03
PARSONS, KURT
1
dd
07/03/03
PIKE, GARY
2,204.01
dd
07/03/03
ROSSMAN, DAVID
2,406.74
dd
07/03/03
DAWSON, RICHARD
1
dd
07/03/03
DUELLMAN, KIRK
1
dd
07/03/03
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
1,628.85
dd
07/03/03
NOVAK, JEROME
1
dd
07/03/03
PETERSON, ROBERT
1,705.85
dd
07/03/03
SVENDSEN, RONALD
1
dd
07/03/03
GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE
2,429.15
dd
07/03/03
BOYER, SCOTT
1,756.65
dd
07/03/03
FEHR, JOSEPH
2
dd
07/03/03
FLAUGHER, JAYME
1,756.65
25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
07/03/03
LAFFERTY, WALTER
2,1.26.03
dd
07/03/03
LINN, BRYAN
2,053.75
dd
07/03/03
PACOLT, MARSHA
1,999.85
dd
07/03/03
RABINE, JANET
2,286.63
dd
07/03/03
SCHAULS, ADAM
246.50
dd
07/03/03
SCHWARTZBAUER, LINDA
136.00
dd
07/03/03
STAHNKE, JULIE
2,399.05
dd
07/03/03
LUKIN, STEVEN
3
dd
07/03/03
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
2,599.72
dd
07/03/03
ZWIEG, SUSAN
1
dd
07/03/03
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
268.49
dd
07/03/03
AHL, R. CHARLES
4
dd
07/03/03
NIVEN, AMY
1,089.49
dd
07/03/03
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
2,391.25
dd
07/03/03
WEGWERTH, JUDITH
1
dd
07/03/03
BRINK, TROY
1,433.45
dd
07/03/03
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
1,776.85
dd
07/03/03
EDGE, DOUGLAS
1,934.44
dd
07/03/03
KANE, MICHAEL
2,643.39
dd
07/03/03
LUTZ, DAVID
2
dd
07/03/03
MEYER, GERALD
1,815.08
dd
07/03/03
NAGEL, BRYAN
1
dd
07/03/03
OSWALD, ERICK
2
dd
07/03/03
TEVLIN, TODD
1,736.71
dd
07/03/03
BOHMBACH, JOSHUA
1
dd
07/03/03
CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER
2
dd
07/03/03
DUCHARME, JOHN
2
dd
07/03/03
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,169.35
dd
07/03/03
MURRA, AARON
1,151.56
dd
07/03/03
PECK, DENNIS
2
dd
07/03/03
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
2
dd
07/03/03
SCHACHT, ERIN
2,005.45
dd
07/03/03
TATE, FRANK
1,721.53
dd
07/03/03
VERMEERSCH, CHARLES
1
dd
07/03/03
ANDERSON, BRUCE
3
dd
07/03/03
DOHERTY, KATHLEEN
1,666.06
dd
07/03/03
HERSOM, HEIDI
1
dd
07/03/03
RIDLEHOOVER, KATE
595.00
dd
07/03/03
BORGLUM, DUSTIN
960.00
dd
07/03/03
MARUSKA, MARK
2,439.86
dd
07/03/03
NAUGHTON, JOHN
1
dd
07/03/03
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
1,734.25
dd
07/03/03
BIESANZ, OAKLEY
1 50 371.42
dd
07/03/03
HAYMAN, JANET
796.56
dd
07/03/03
HUTCHINSON, ANN
2,031.16
dd
07/03/03
KOS, HEATHER
432.25
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
27
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
07/03/03
NELSON, JEAN
1,008.50
dd
07/03/03
FOERG, ELIZABETH
802.50
dd
07/03/03
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
1 5 927.37
dd
07/03/03
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
2,558.52
dd
07/03/03
KROLL, LISA
1,016.20
dd
07/03/03
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE
923.37
dd
07/03/03
SINDT, ANDREA
1,439.85
dd
07/03/03
THOMPSON, DEBRA
614.66
dd
07/03/03
YOUNG, TAMELA
1
dd
07/03/03
FINWALL, SHANN
1
dd
07/03/03
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2,368.35
dd
07/03/03
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2
dd
07/03/03
FISHER, DAVID
2,794.18
dd
07/03/03
RICE, MICHAEL
768.00
dd
07/03/03
SWAN, DAVID
1,415.05
dd
07/03/03
KONEWKO, DUWAYNE
2,211.05
dd
07/03/03
ANZALDI, MANDY
773.50
dd
07/03/03
BJORK, BRANDON
598.38
dd
07/03/03
FINN, GREGORY
1,862.74
dd
07/03/03
GAETZ, HOLLY
70.00
dd
07/03/03
GERVAIS, DAVID
561.00
dd
07/03/03
GRAF, MICHAEL
1
dd
07/03/03
KELLY, LISA
1,245.79
dd
07/03/03
NIEMCZYK, BRIAN
80.00
dd
07/03/03
PETERS, TRISHA
650.25
dd
07/03/03
ROBBINS, AUDRA
1
dd
07/03/03
STROBEL, JESSICA
80.00
dd
07/03/03
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,562.64
dd
07/03/03
ZIELINSKI, JOSEPH
55.00
dd
07/03/03
BREHEIM, ROGER
1,738.86
dd
07/03/03
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
1
dd
07/03/03
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
1
dd
07/03/03
CROSSON, LINDA
2
dd
07/03/03
DIAZ, SUSAN
367.54
dd
07/03/03
EASTMAN, THOMAS
2,345.93
dd
07/03/03
ERICKSON, KYLE
839.90
dd
07/03/03
MAROUSHEK, KRISTIN
362.58
dd
07/03/03
PARTLOW, JOSHUA
293.34
dd
07/03/03
PELOQUIN, PENNYE
444.54
dd
07/03/03
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
1,643.88
dd
07/03/03
STAPLES, PAULINE
2,641.74
dd
07/03/03
ABRAHAMSON, DANIEL
207.13
dd
07/03/03
ABRAHAMSON, REBECCA
431.75
dd
07/03/03
BRENEMAN, NEIL
390.77
dd
07/03/03
CORNER, AMY
151.20
dd
07/03/03
CRONIN, CHAD
331.50
27
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
07/03/03
FONTAINE, ANTHONY
598.51
dd
07/03/03
GUZIK, JENNIFER
109.60
dd
07/03/03
HALEY, BROOKE
328.25
dd
07/03/03
HORWATH, RONALD
1,648.82
dd
07/03/03
IRISH, GRACE
396.28
dd
07/03/03
IRISH, KARL
43.50
dd
07/03/03
KOEHNEN, AMY
20.55
dd
07/03/03
KOEHNEN, MARY
537.82
dd
07/03/03
KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
687.23
dd
07/03/03
OVERBY, ANNA
18.00
dd
07/03/03
POWERS, JESSICA
25.95
dd
07/03/03
SCHAEFER, ROB
68.88
dd
07/03/03
SCHULTZ, PETER
27.40
dd
07/03/03
THOEMKE, MARIE
61.75
dd
07/03/03
WILHELM, MELISSA
312.00
dd
07/03/03
ZIELINSKI, JENNIFER
41.48
dd
07/03/03
GROPPOLI, LINDA
329.38
dd
07/03/03
RENSLOW, RITA
272.25
dd
07/03/03
CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND
90.35
dd
07/03/03
LONETTI, JAMES
891.28
dd
07/03/03
PATTERSON, ALBERT
948.36
dd
07/03/03
PRINS, KELLY
848.29
dd
07/03/03
REILLY, MICHAEL
1
dd
07/03/03
STEINHORST, JEFFREY
537.08
dd
07/03/03
AICHELE, CRAIG
1,743.85
dd
07/03/03
PRIEM, STEVEN
1,950.25
dd
07/03/03
BERGO, CHAD
1,933.93
dd
07/03/03
FOWLDS, MYCHAL
1
dd
07/03/03
HURLEY, STEPHEN
2
Wf
93981
07/03/03
CARDINAL, ROBERT
406.20
Wf
93982
07/03/03
WASILUK, JULIE
357.47
Wf
93983
07/03/03
INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS
112.50
Wf
93984
07/03/03
KARSTENS, BRAD
50.00
Wf
93985
07/03/03
JAHN, DAVID
1,501.35
Wf
93986
07/03/03
MALDONADO, JUANA
529.21
Wf
93987
07/03/03
MORIN, TROY
204.00
Wf
93988
07/03/03
MATHEYS, ALANA
1,793.85
Wf
93989
07/03/03
GENNOW, PAMELA
1,036.75
Wf
93990
07/03/03
HANSEN, LORI
1,553.45
Wf
93991
07/03/03
VIETOR, LORRAINE
1,714.17
Wf
93992
07/03/03
PALANK, MARY
1,536.65
Wf
93993
07/03/03
RICHIE, CAROLE
1
Wf
93994
07/03/03
SVENDSEN, JOANNE
1
Wf
93995
07/03/03
TICHY, PAMELA
63.00
Wf
93996
07/03/03
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
2,744.96
Wf
93997
07/03/03
STEINER, JOSEPH
453.00
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
29
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
93998
07/03/03
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2
Wf
93999
07/03/03
ENGSTRAN, STEVEN
157.25
Wf
94000
07/03/03
REYNOSO, ANGEL
289.00
Wf
94001
07/03/03
KUMLIN, KARMA
136.00
Wf
94002
07/03/03
FREBERG, RONALD
1
Wf
94003
07/03/03
HAAG, ROBERT
680.00
Wf
94004
07/03/03
JONES, DONALD
2
Wf
94005
07/03/03
STEWART, RYAN
680.00
Wf
94006
07/03/03
GROVER, MICHAEL
701.68
Wf
94007
07/03/03
JAROSCH, JONATHAN
867.30
Wf
94008
07/03/03
EDSON, DAVID
1,769.54
Wf
94009
07/03/03
HELEY, ROLAND
1
Wf
94010
07/03/03
HINNENKAMP, GARY
1,782.05
Wf
94011
07/03/03
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1
Wf
94012
07/03/03
NAUGHTON, RYAN
520.00
Wf
94013
07/03/03
NIEMCZYK, ANTHONY
640.00
Wf
94014
07/03/03
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,607.77
Wf
94015
07/03/03
GERNES, CAROLE
608.13
Wf
94016
07/03/03
SOUTTER, CHRISTINE
256.50
Wf
94017
07/03/03
ANZALDI, KALI
328.50
Wf
94018
07/03/03
BALLESTRAZZE, THAD
920.00
Wf
94019
07/03/03
BENSON, CARLA
338.00
Wf
94020
07/03/03
BOTHWELL, KRISTIN
321.63
Wf
94021
07/03/03
DEGREE, AMANDA
308.13
Wf
94022
07/03/03
FRANK, LAURA
798.00
Wf
94023
07/03/03
GEBHARD, JILLIAN
832.13
Wf
94024
07/03/03
GLASS, DANIEL
40.00
Wf
94025
07/03/03
GOODRICH, CHAD
420.75
Wf
94026
07/03/03
HJERMSTAD, MEGAN
378.00
Wf
94027
07/03/03
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
702.00
Wf
94028
07/03/03
PETERSON, TYLER
408.38
Wf
94029
07/03/03
SPIELMAN, CHRISTA
446.88
Wf
94030
07/03/03
UNGAR, KRISTOPHER
105.00
Wf
94031
07/03/03
WERNER, KATIE
702.50
Wf
94032
07/03/03
YOUNG, SHAWN
654.50
Wf
94033
07/03/03
GERMAIN, DAVID
1
Wf
94034
07/03/03
HAAG, MARK
1
Wf
94035
07/03/03
NADEAU, EDWARD
2
Wf
94036
07/03/03
BEHR, HEATHER
205.25
Wf
94037
07/03/03
BROWN, LAURIE
296.00
Wf
94038
07/03/03
DISKERUD, HEATHER
86.63
Wf
94039
07/03/03
GLASS, JEAN
1
Wf
94040
07/03/03
MOY, PAMELA
376.49
Wf
94041
07/03/03
SHOBERG, GARY
726.84
Wf
94042
07/03/03
TOLBERT, FRANCINE
288.60
Wf
94043
07/03/03
TOOMBS, CARRELL
74.80
29
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
30
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
94044
07/03/03
UNGER, MARGARET
3 80.23
Wf
94045
07/03/03
ANDERSON, CALEB
171.25
Wf
94046
07/03/03
BACHMAN, NICOLE
186.20
Wf
94047
07/03/03
CHAPMAN, JENNY
359.67
Wf
94048
07/03/03
COSTA, JOSEPH
61.05
Wf
94049
07/03/03
DEMPSEY, BETH
86.40
Wf
94050
07/03/03
DIERICH, ANDREA
144.00
Wf
94051
07/03/03
DOTY, JANET
375.54
Wf
94052
07/03/03
DUNK, RYAN
602.59
Wf
94053
07/03/03
FALKENSTEIN, MONICA
299.20
Wf
94054
07/03/03
FENGER, JUSTIN
263.53
Wf
94055
07/03/03
FINNEGAN, KAREN
56.10
Wf
94056
07/03/03
FONTAINE, KIM
492.89
Wf
94057
07/03/03
FRETZ, SARAH
568.58
Wf
94058
07/03/03
GRANT, MELISSA
49.13
Wf
94059
07/03/03
GRUENHAGEN, LINDA
199.35
Wf
94060
07/03/03
HOLMGREN, LEAH
732.94
Wf
94061
07/03/03
HOULE, DENISE
215.50
Wf
94062
07/03/03
HUPPERT, ERIN
634.43
Wf
94063
07/03/03
JOHNSON, ROBERT
235.46
Wf
94064
07/03/03
JOHNSON, STETSON
487.33
Wf
94065
07/03/03
JOYER, MARTI
41.70
Wf
94066
07/03/03
KERSCHNER, JOLENE
523.96
Wf
94067
07/03/03
LINDSTROM, AMANDA
120.25
Wf
94068
07/03/03
MATHISEN -JR, DEAN
405.00
Wf
94069
07/03/03
MCMAHON, MELISSA
400.06
Wf
94070
07/03/03
MELCHER, ROBERT
222.63
Wf
94071
07/03/03
MILLS, ANNE
155.05
Wf
94072
07/03/03
MOSSONG, ANDREA
641.33
Wf
94073
07/03/03
O'REAGAN, CHRISTINE
51.88
Wf
94074
07/03/03
OLSON, MARGRET
241.40
Wf
94075
07/03/03
PEHOSKI, JOEL
467.55
Wf
94076
07/03/03
PROESCH, ANDY
219.28
Wf
94077
07/03/03
RENSTROM, KEVIN
356.18
Wf
94078
07/03/03
SMITLEY, SHARON
249.75
Wf
94079
07/03/03
TUPY, HEIDE
93.50
Wf
94080
07/03/03
TUPY, MARCUS
164.10
Wf
94081
07/03/03
WAGNER, ERIC
44.00
Wf
94082
07/03/03
WARNER, CAROLYN
44.40
Wf
94083
07/03/03
WEDES, CARYL
129.90
Wf
94084
07/03/03
WELTER, ELIZABETH
369.83
Wf
94085
07/03/03
WHITE, NICOLE '
269.96
Wf
94086
07/03/03
WHITE, TIMOTHY
122.85
Wf
94087
07/03/03
WILLIAMS, KELLY
442.35
Wf
94088
07/03/03
WOODMAN, ALICE
20.00
Wf
94089
07/03/03
BOSLEY, CAROL
271.60
30
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
31
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
94090
07/03/03
ESALA, HOPE
165.75
wf
94091
07/03/03
FARLEY, JAMIE
230.00
wf
94092
07/03/03
GLASS, GILLIAN
501.13
wf
94093
07/03/03
HANSEN, ANNA
32.00
wf
94094
07/03/03
KURKOSKI, STEPHANIE
104.00
wf
94095
07/03/03
ODDEN, JESSICA
36.00
wf
94096
07/03/03
OIE, REBECCA
114.00
wf
94097
07/03/03
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
221.00
wf
94098
07/03/03
VAN HALE, PAULA
84.50
wf
94099
07/03/03
BEHAN, JAMES
1,646.05
wf
94100
07/03/03
CHIGINSKY, APRIL
133.00
wf
94101
07/03/03
COLLINS, ASHLEY
278.00
wf
94102
07/03/03
DOUGLASS, TOM
904.84
wf
94103
07/03/03
JAMES, JANET
88.90
wf
94104
07/03/03
KYRK, ASHLEY
195.20
wf
94105
07/03/03
LOGAN, HEATHER
547.70
wf
94106
07/03/03
NAGEL, BROOKE
69.85
wf
94107
07/03/03
PETERSON, LYNDSAY
85.80
wf
94108
07/03/03
SARPONG, SEAN
432.85
wf
94109
07/03/03
SCHULZE, BRIAN
268.00
wf
94110
07/03/03
SEVERSON, HOLLY
53.55
wf
94111
07/03/03
YOUNG, MATTHEW
174.00
wf
94112
07/03/03
ZIEMER, NICOLE
143.85
wf
94113
07/03/03
MULVANEY, DENNIS
1,911.48
423,850.36
31
Agenda #
Action b� Co��cl�
MEMORANDUM ,
Date
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
Ae WcWd
7-4
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: July 7, 2002
RE: Postage Machine Purchase
The city clerk department maintains and operates the citywide postage machine. The current
Pitney Bowes machine was purchased in June 1993. The City averages about 68,000 pieces of
mail annually.
Background
Because of the age of the machine, parts for it are no longer made and are hard to come by when
needed. The machine has required 12 maintenance visits since the beginning of the year and
some mailing functions are no longer working and parts are unavailable.
After much research, staff is proposing the purchase of a Pitney Bowes DM800 Digital Mailing
System from the State Contract. The machine has been built with more capabilities but fewer
moving parts requiring repair and maintenance.
After consulting with Finance Director Faust, is it requested that Council approve the transfer of
$15,480.00 from the contingency account to the City Clerk Department for the purchase of the
postage machine.
Agenda Item #
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
RE: Temporary Gambling Resolution
DATE: July 7, 2003
1®n by Council
Rejected
Chris Gargaro, on behalf of Hill Murray School, 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East, has applied for a
temporary gambling license to be used on October 3, 2003, to conduct a raffle for fund raising
for the school. In order for the State of Minnesota to issue a temporary license, approval of the
following resolution from the City is required.
RESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the
temporary premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Hill Murray School, 2625
Larpenteur Avenue East, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the
timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control
Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in
compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of
Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
AGENDA ITEM NOmmoomm,
4-
Action by Council
AGENDA REPGRT Date
h,
Rejected
To: City Manager Richard Fursman
From: Chief David Thomalla
Date: 7/7/2003
Re: Safe and Sober Grant Resolution
In+mA irtinn
The Maplewood Police Department has applied for a Safe and Sober Grant through
the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for the period from October 1, 2003
through September 30, 2004.
Background
In the past, the Maplewood Police Department has received grant money from the
Department of Public Safety to participate in the Safe and Sober Program. The
Department received $30,000 in Safe and Sober Grant money for 2003.
As part of the application process for the 2003 -2004 grant money, the City Council
must approve the attached resolution, which allows us to enter into an agreement
with the Department of Public Safety to implement the Safe and Sober Program and
administer the grant.
Recommendation
It is recommend that the City Council pass the resolution to enable the Maplewood
Police Department to participate in the Safe and Sober Program for 2003 -2004.
Action Required
Submit to the City Council for review and action.
Attachment
TogetNr 'We Can
Agenda #
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Final Plat
PROJECT: Dearborn Meadow
LOCATION: Castle Place, south of Castle Avenue
DATE: July 2, 2003
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
INTRODUCTION
Patrick Kinney is requesting that the city council approve the Dearborn Meadow final plat. Mr.
Kinney represents the property owner and builder of the development. This plat would create six
lots for town houses in the first phase of the project and would be on Castle Place, south of
Castle Avenue. (See the maps on pages three - five.)
BACKGROUND
On June 10, 2002, the city council made several approvals for the nine -unit Dearborn Meadows
town houses. These included:
1. A change to the comprehensive plan. This change was from M -1 (light manufacturing)
to R -2 (single and double dwellings) for the site.
2. A change to the zoning map. This was from M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -2 (single
and double dwellings) for the site.
3. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD). This PUD was to
allow the town houses to be on smaller lots than the code usually allows (in area and in
width) and to have them on a private driveway.
4. A preliminary plat for nine lots for the .nine housing units. (See the -plan on page six.)
5. The design plans for the site, landscaping and buildings.
Please see the minutes starting on page seven.
On May 27, 2003, the city council approved the following for the revised Dearborn Meadow
plans:
1. A revision to the approved conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development
(PUD). The revised PUD was for 15 Town houses, instead of the approved nine -unit
development that the city approved in 2002.
2. A revised preliminary plat for 15 lots for the 15 housing units.
3. The design plans for the site, landscaping and buildings.
Please see the minutes starting on page 17.
DISCUSSION
The developer's contractor is progressing with this plat, including having started the site grading
and the street and utility construction. He has finished all the conditions the council required for
-final plat approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Dearborn Meadow final plat. This approval is subject to the county recording the
deed restrictions and covenants required by the city.
p:secl 1 /Dearborn Meadow First final plat.doc
Attachments:
1 Location Map
2. Area Map
3. Proposed Final Plat
4. Approved Nine Unit Plan and Preliminary Plat
5. 6 -10 -02 Council Minutes
6. 5 -27 -03 Council Minutes
7. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment)
2
Attachment I
RAOMIIZ
cotfm
wult
XoH,"
EDGEH&L RD.
a
AV
f � NORTH SAINT PAUL
�T
OFJ"T ` I AVE.
� AVE. � El- El�Ejy�
SD( TIWT � � A
AVE
{VIE1N AVE YMONG OR,
SHRRQ1 AVE
l� 1 AVE COPE AVE. �.
AVE — `"J � UM AVE � � � RD.
UAJRIE RD. � � LAURIE RD W
PW*
URSf � AVE 5 d
CO. RD. � g 3
BURKE AVE A � BtIRKE AVE.
)GE AVE JON ohm
AYE
AVE HARRIS AVE j
it06EW00D AVE N.
r p
M! AV. AVE. S. � �
4 .
J
Z
O
Z
NORTH SAINT PAUL I
i AVE 1 "i ( I .. ___... nrr,uv�a _ .0 NalAwAY I I 1 I AN
SU AVE
vi
S b
dl
y 0 Y
GOV
2
Rm.EY AVE
�n 1pNGS7ON AVE
PRICE ANE. rn
Po*
4
RI PLtY AY
lf"GSToN
AVE.
�C�f�i�l LN
LJ1RP'EMEUR
LOCATION MAP
3
4
N
Attachment Z
AREA MAP
4
4
N
Attachment 3
�• - 1 - - 1 - f� • 1 - r, 1 t • 1 1 I 1 . ♦♦ 1 t• 1 A t I t I r 1 • �. /• .
' 1 / 1 F• , M/ t 1 I \1 M F•1 1 1 .. F♦ 1 /11 I t ► 1 \1 1 1 t rl
' ♦J 1 / - 1 1 {._ 1 1• \/ 11 1 t / I 1 ♦I 1 1 •• / - \ 1 1• \♦ \/ \I
1 ' 1l 1 M t 1 \1 1 .. 1 1 �f I if F• 1
r,
Highway Easement per document no. 430232
Fnd 112 Inch Iron Pipe —_ Northerly line of Lots 26 through 30, Block 7, and Lots 16 and 17,
.
R.L No. 6743 1 0 �•, _ • I ►� — ' 81ock S. DEAR19ORN PARK, and their exten across Getman street. N
1 ... X89 38 18 E , _
319.72
T
_ _ t
t P1�o I \ 106.91 << �� Fnd 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe
I I % �
V . I . I ��G �Ea� J { .D�i�U ,%t R.L.S. No. 6743+
I t ` V ` t
601
S89 °38 "W
� � l
N
I � •( � C to
o K a ao
I ♦ � I �,,� � a'
L ` 1
I -C
C
o° t
. c
CJ � ��' �i� ( L• �
'— 0� r�/ J ►1fi
0
z I o
•r i
! �
A. ./ N
.. J -re
. I j ., r • :zOV - . t 115 YY /, ... ' L 1l! I
I I aC ! I s! i s/ t O l L I
1 /
1 /
(V
I !1
i
I t ♦ AI
V O
N M
V N
I to Street vacation per
document no. 321652
I
�
Io,•
t
p�
AL
�Q I .\ , ti
I to Street vacation per
document no. 321652
.1l11c I
Ede of Wet land as
, dol by Arilg J
Eaviromenta,
I
I
; °' i r.'`a
�, E
S89 "W
1
t
IO- 1
ICD
` t In o?
,.Fnd 112 Inch Iron PI I May 14, 1999.
oo R.LS. No. 6743
J
: u t
rn� J
j
O 10J.00 M /
`
r♦ • Y r- r, t
♦ -
/
J `- �• ' I
, 1 1 1
My J
1 1
J
/
line of vacated Fifth Avenue
1 1
� _ •..��.. —
_ ��� _
-� !r • t . r_
519. 1
S89 "A I
�\ ��`
AL
I
I
I
_mot
- _ —
CO
m
Fnd 112 Inch Iron Pipe -�
R.LS. No. 6743 1
`l ,�G G Q. o
J
• - ' I
'
• =
c O
C7'
/�
/
J
I
�z
~
I
I I 1
I �. • 1
L_
03 Ch
Z "
04 Ci ?
•
t fi t ' Ow e
I I
! i
�♦ I 1
I I � ♦
� J I
ao
LAJ
w
1 L_
XCI p I
j N O �Q
0 6
con 0L �'V\�Q P� • ( N I I
� L J
oJ���PO I o l
I
I I I
sal I � t I
Southerly line of N1 /2 of vacated alley.
/ l
p T � Alley vacation per 7
- �= O
Fnd 112 Inch Iron Pipe � , ,.- document no. 32]652 157.00 103.U0 ''•�- � -- \' -
4 _.
• ► I R.L S No. �i340 � . t. ;!. ; .,
.`y o 107.00 0 �;r N
I ,
_ _ ' 260.00 _ _ .
Fnd t12 Inch 1r Pipe N89.38�f?6 "�►' `Fnd 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe
R.LS No. 17006 I
R.LS. No. 17006)
r
Y, /♦ r 1
A r7
4 11
c_
1\ J 1 \I I\ A
PROPOSED FINAL PLAT
5.
4
N
Attachment 4
I OWN F=L.4 T ( 4 . P.U.D. 0P) GRAPHIC SCALE
-10 0
0W
MIKE AC46ERMAN H I G H W A Y 3 6 I inch t "
7317 Brian Drive Top - 971.92
CENTERWLLE, Ad N. 55038 lnv..967.72 n`
TEL 651- 779 -4149 C a w _s-s2+ Concrete a�r>b x (0 0
_ C A S T L E A V E N U E _ _ —
—&-624 Conaret: ore r — — N89 38�! WON 77sE7
ti Rl.a / 6743
Fnd 112 I.P.
I . ( R.LS / �74 �.' I I N ;� o
A O
M. 6sn I I
'%%o NO 36.
K
Z.
=. 9G3W 96376 k QB,
( l:x'isting,
r
2f.0'
:,.I,,:
41L0 - -.
::MR. i
1
2
SEV
40.0 L
1 v; 40.0
-• a
• o
l. w
610 i
�
N . 26.0' j
AL
POW 1
I I
1 65 0 36.8•
14 - NNL 77 _ wlV a r 11
'
x95YA7 lei•`- 0 ` �� AL
FnRarw�t h s ( '� 3
4 4.6•
Fnd 1/2' J P i 0 "'s , I — ^u
`- R." lid 6743 - �. h
1ti o ,� ,
S89 -
`�' 59.9
Fnd 112' J.P.' p
R.I.S. /' 6743
• \ W I V 2aa I ss.o
o - I . 4T I T
! I I
ir nlpl ' I.P. ''
65 0 Q
I I I I 38.8 � Q
CL
I I I
05 cr) VIA
e n cq
w O � ZS.GAGK
1 65.0 1 I
I I I 65 0 8>u 34.8'
I x 30.0'
a _
T 2&0' I ,.
! 3&5 65,0 I I I 5a0 I I
I ir,o I I
-.. `
N'ly Une of S1 /2 of vacated alley fend it's eoaterly extension °• � . � —
N
AL LE 1/2 LP. - -_ CV
Q R.LS. / 4340 (VACATED) y 42e
Fnd 112' 1 a� Fnd 712' 1 P-e --- --
-_) T — `— N89 B 06 "E R.L.S / 17006 F
t0 00
97031
.. !
. .
I % I
19 I
1949
I I I I t�ruung,N'oas. I I I ! ! I I
Existing I •House
! I I I •! I I ' ► I I I I
Son �__— I_--- i---- -1 - -_J
Stub
v , C 0 P E A ,,w �� +:+ E Top - 973.42
V Jne =969.72
m
APPROVED NINE UNIT PLAN - 2002
6 y_
li
N
Attachment 5
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 10, 2002
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 02 -12
3. 7:30 (9:26P.M.) Dearborn Meadow (Castle Avenue)
A. Land Use Plan Change -Ml (Light Manufacturing) to R -2 (single and double dwellings)
B. Zoning Map Change -Ml (Light Manufacturing) to R -2 (single and double dwellings)
C. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development
D. Preliminary Plat
E. Design Approval
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. Assistant Community Development Director Ekstran.d presented the specifics of the report.
C. Tom Ekstrand presented the Review Board Report.
d. Commissioner Fisher presented the Planning ommission Report.
g p
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Mike Ackerman, owner of property
Bob Zick, .1880 E. Shore Drive, Maplewood
Jim Oswald, 1948 Cope Avenue, Maplewood
f.. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the followin resolution that changes the land use lan for
the Dearborn Meadow plat and two adjacent properties on the south side of Castle Avenue, north of
Cope Avenue. This change is from M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -2 .single and double dwellings):
RESOLUTION 02 -06 -104
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mike Ackerman and Maplewood city staff proposed a change to the city's land use plan from
M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -2 (single and double dwellings).
WHE AS, this change applies to
1. Lots 16 and 17, Block 6, Lots 27, 28, 29 and the east half of Lot 26, Block 7, Lots 1, 2, .and 3, Block
10, Lots 14 and 15, Block 11, all in Dearborn Park, together with adjacent alleys and streets in Section
g J y
11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (The property to be known as Lots 1 -10 of
the proposed Dearborn Meadow)
2. Lots 18 through 22, Block 6, Lots 9 through 13, Block 11, all in Dearborn Park, together with adjacent
alleys and streets, in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, MN.
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
7 1
3. Lot 4 and the east half of Lot 5, Block 7, all in Dearborn Park, in Section 11, Township 9, Range 22
p g
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1
1. On May 20, 2002, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing
..notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning
commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The
planning commission recommended that the city council approve the plan. amendment.
2. On June 10, 2002, the city council discussed the proposed land use plan. change. They considered
reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city. approve the above - described char
tY pp e for g
the following reasons:
I. It would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive Ian.
p p
2. This area would eliminate the planned commercial area that would have been between two residential
areas.
3. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for medium - density residential use. This
includes:
a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing low - density residential and commercial land
uses.
b. It is on a collector street and is near an arterial street.
C. Minimizing any adverse effects on surrounding properties because there would be no traffic from
this development on existing residential streets.
4. It would be consistent with the proposed zoning and land uses.
Seconded by C.ouncilmember Koppen Ayes -All
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the following resolution that changes the zoning map for
Dearborn Meadow plat and two adjacent properties on the south side of Castle Avenue, north of Cope
Avenue:
RESOLUTION 02 -06 -105
RESOLUTION: ZONING. MAP CHANGE
WHEREAS, Mike Ackerman proposed a change to the zoning map from M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -2
(single. and double dwellings).
WHEREAS, Maplewood city staff proposed a change to the zoning map from M -1 (light manufacturing)
to R -2 (single and double dwellings) for two undeveloped parcels adjacent to the proposed development.
WHEREAS, these changes apply to the undeveloped property on the south side of Castle Avenue, north of
Cope Avenue.
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
8 2
WHEREAS, the legal description of these properties are:
1. Lots 16. and 17, Block 6, Lots 27, 28, 29 and the east half of Lot 26, Block 7, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block
. 10, Lots 14 and 15, Block 11, all in Dearborn Park, together with adjacent alleys and streets, in Section
11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (The property to be known as Dearborn.
Meadow)
2. Lots 18 through 22, Block 6, Lots 9 through 13, Block 11, all in Dearborn Park, together with adjacent
alleys and streets, in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey Coun
ty .
3. Lot 4 and the east half of Lot 5, Block 7, all in Dearborn Park, in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22,
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as. follows:
1. On May 20, 2002, the planning commission recommended that the "city ouncil approve this change.
ty pp e. g
2. On June 10, 2002, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at
the hearing an opportunity to - speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports
and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described change in the
zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2.' The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or
from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in
the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where
applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical
extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and
schools.
5. The owner plans to develop this property for single and double dwellings.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolution approving a conditional use
permit for a planned unit development for the Dearborn Meadow Development on the south side of
Castle Avenue
RESOLUTION 02 -06 -106
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Mike Ackerman, representing Ackerman Construction Company, applied for a
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
9 3
conditional use permit (CUP) for the Dearborn Meadow residential planned unit development (PUD).
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the Dearborn Meadow development plan the city received on April 24
p p tY p
2002. The legal description is:
Lots 16 and 17, Block 6, Lots 27, 28 29 and the east half of Lot 26, Block 7 Lots 1, 2, and 3 Block
10, Lots 14 and 15, Block 11, all in Dearborn Park, together with adjacent alleys and streets, in Section
11, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (.The property to be known as Lots 1 -9 of the
proposed Dearborn Meadow)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On May 20, 2002, the lannin . commission recommended that the city council a '
p g y approve this
permit.
2. On June 10, 2002 the city council held a ublic hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
p g tY p
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional
use permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity
with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that.
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance- to an person or
any
because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and
fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services..
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans approved by the city. The city council may approve major
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
4
10
changes to the plans. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes to the
plans. Such changes shall include:
a. Revising the grading and site plans to show:
(1) The developer minimizing the loss or removal of natural vegetation.
(2) All driveways at least 20 feet wide. If the developer wants to have parking on one side
of the main drive (Castle Place), then it must be at least 28 feet wide.
(3 All parking stalls with a width of at least 9.5 feet and a length of at least 18 feet.
2.. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall meet all the
conditions and changes noted in the engineer's memo dated May 14, 20020
4. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in the Dearborn Meadow PUD shall be:
a. Front -yard setback (from a public street or a private driveway): minimum - 30 feet, maximum —
35 feet
b.. Front -yard setback (public side street): minimum - 30 feet, maximum — 35 feet
c. Rear -yard setback: 30 feet from any adjacent residential property line
d. Side -yard setback (town houses): minimum - 20 feet from a property line and 20 feet
minimum between buildings.
5. The developer or builder will pay the city Park Access Charges (PAC fees) for each housing unit at the
time of the building permit for each housing unit.
6. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Councihnember Wasiluk Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the preliminary plat for Dearborn Meadow:
The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city
requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Pay the city for the cost of traffic-control, street identification and no- parking signs.
d. Provide all required and necessary easements (including all utility easements and ten -foot
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
11 5
drainage and utility easements along the front and rear lot lines of each .lot and five -foot drainage
and utility easements along the side lot lines of each lot).
e. Cap and seal any wells on site.
f. Have Xcel Energy install a street light at the intersection of Castle Avenue and the proposed
private driveway. (Castle Place). The exact location and type of light shall be subject to the city
engineer's approval.
g. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easement. These signs shall mark
the edge of the easements and shall state that there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling,
grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign design and location
before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall install these signs before the
city issues building permits in this plat.
h. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering laps. These plans shall include
� gp p
grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans shall meet all the
conditions and changes listed. in the memo dated May 14, 2002 and shall meet the following
conditions:
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with - the, city code.
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. The
lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat,
(2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) Show housing pads that reduce the. grading on sites where the developer can save large
trees.
(4) Show the proposed street and driveway grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(5) Include the tree plan that:
• Shows where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall
include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
• Shows no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
(6) Show drainage areas and the developer's engineer shall provide the city engineer with
the drainage calculations. The drainage design shall accommodate the runoff from the
surrounding areas. The undeveloped parcel to the east of this site shall have unrestricted
access to the storm sewer with a capacity to accommodate post development runoff.
c. The street and utility plans shall show the:
(1) Water service to each lot and unit.
City Council Meeting 06 - 10 - 02
12 6
(2) Repair of Castle Avenue (street and boulevard) after the developer connects to the public
utilities and builds the private driveways.
(3) Design of the sanitary sewer allowing for the unrestricted access to the sanitary sewer in
the development from the undeveloped properties adjacent to the site (primarily to the
east).
3. Paying for costs- related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans.
4. Change the plat as follows:
a. Add drainage and, utility easements as required by the city engineer. This shall include a 30 -foot-
wide easement for the existing 16 -inch water main and easements for any other existing utilities
on the site. The Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) shall approve the description and
location of the easement for the water main.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements
shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines. and five feet wide along the side
property lines.
c. Label the private street as Castle Place and label Castle Street as Castle Avenue on all plans.
d. Label the common area as Outlot A.
e. Provide easements to allow for unrestricted access to the storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water
.main in the development from the undeveloped parcel to the east.
5. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including any off -site drainage and
utility easements.
6. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city._
engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has
not completed before final plat approval:
7. If necessary, obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading.
8. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community
development may wave any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
9.* Submitting the homeowners' association bylaws and rules to the director of community
development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the maintenance of the
private utilities; driveways and common areas.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading ermit or a s
p pp rove
the final plat.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans date-stamped April- 24 2002 site plan',
landscape plan_,_uading and drainage plans and building elevations) for Dearborn Meadow.
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
13 7
The city bases this approval on the findings required by the code. The developer or contractor shall do
the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
a.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall
include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, sidewalk and driveway and parking lot
- plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions:
(1) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with city code.
(2) The grading plan shall:
(a) Include building, floor elevation and contour information.
(b) Include contour information for the land that the construction will disturb.
(c) Show sedimentation basins or ponds as may be required by the watershed board or by
the city engineer.
(d). Show a berm (two to four feet high) along the south property line of the site.
(3)* The tree plan shall:
(a) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or tree removal
(b) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall
include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
(c) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous trees
shall be at least two and one half (2 1/2) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of red
and white oaks and sugar maples.
(d) Show no tree removal beyond the. approved grading and tree limits.
(4) All the parking areas and driveways shall have continuous concrete curb and gutter
except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed.
(5) There shall be no parking on one side of the 28- foot -wide driveway (Castle Place)..
The developer or contractor shall post Castle Place with no parking signs to meet the
above- listed standard.
b. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction and have each building staked by a
registered land surveyor.
c. Submit a revised landscape plan to staff for approval which incorporates the following details:
(1) All trees would be consistent with city standards for size, location and species.
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
14 8
(2) Planting (instead of sodding) the disturbed areas around the wetland with native grasses
and native flowering plants. The native grasses and flowering plants shall be those
needing little or no maintenance and shall extend at least four feet from the ordinary .high
water mark, (OHWM) of the pond. This is to reduce maintenance costs and to reduce the
temptation of people mowing into the pond.
(3) The maple trees must be at least Z inches in caliper, balled and burlapped.
(4) The plantings proposed around the front of the units shown on the landscape plan date-
stamped April 24, 2002 shall remain on the plan.
(5) In addition to the above, the contractor shall sod all front, side and rear yard areas (except
for mulched and edged planting beds and the area within the wetland easement).
(6) No landscaping shall take place in the Castle Avenue boulevard. The contractor shall
restore the boulevard with sod.
(7) Adding five more evergreen trees (Black Hills spruce or Austrian pines) to the proposed
11 evergreen trees along the south property line of the site. These trees are to be at least
six feet tall and the contractor shall plant these trees - in staggered rows on the berm.
d. Present a color scheme to staff for approval for each building.
e. Present a revised building plan to staff that shows brick wainscoting on the north face of Unit 3
(along Castle Avenue) extending back to at least the peak of the roof.
3 Complete the following before occupying each building:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
e boulevards. d all landscaped areas except b. Restore and sod damaged bou e ds So p p t for the area within the
easement, which may be seeded.
c. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter along all interior driveways and around all open
parking stalls.
d. The developer or contractor shall:
(1) Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
(2) Remove any debris or junk- from the site.
e. Put addresses on each building for each unit.
f. Provide driveway turn arounds for Lots 1 and 2 on Castle Avenue.
4. If any required work - is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
15 9
shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished g
landsca p in shall be
completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of
occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city o complete an finished work.
tY p Y unfinished
5. All work shall follow the approved Tans. The director of community development pp p y p may approve
minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
Councilmember Collins moved to table the liquor and tobacco violations on the agenda K5 10 and
Kl1 .
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
10; 10
Attachment 6
6. Building Code Ordinance Change
Adopted changes to the Building and Building Regulations Chapter.
7. Fire Code Ordinance Change
Adopted the New State Fire Code, National Fire Protection Association Codes and Life
Safety Codes.
8. Residential Siding Permit Fee
Approved the addition to the Community Development Department Service charge of a
flat building permit fee of $50.00 for replacing siding on asingle- family dwelling and
accessory structure.
9. Conditional Use Permit Review -The Gardens (Summer Lane at McMenemy Street)
Agreed to review the conditional use permit for The Gardens development on Summer .
Lane again only if a problem develops or if the owner proposes a major change to. the site.
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the consent agenda items 1 -4 and 6 -9 as presented.
Seconded. by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the consent agenda item 5 as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -Mayor Cardinal,
Councilmembers Collins, 'Juenemann
and Wasiluk
Abstain- Councilmember Koppen
.. H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:32 p.in. Dearborn Meadow East (Castle Avenue)
Conditional Use Permit Revision for Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat Revision
Design Approval
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. Associate Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report.
C. Commissioner Dierich presented the Planning Commission Report.
d. Boardmember Shankar presented the Community Design Review Board Report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The
following person was heard:
17
City Council 05 -27 -03 4
Patrick Kinney, the applicant, 4108 Oakmede, White Bear Lake
d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adopt the following resolution approving a revision to the
conditional use permit for a planed unit development for the 15 -unit Dearborn Meadow and
Dearborn Meadow East development on the south side of Castle Avenue:
RESOLUTION 03 -05 -092
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Pat Kinney applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) revision for the
Dearborn. Meadow residential planned unit development (PUD).
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the 15 -lot Dearborn Meadow East development the city
received on April 7; 2003. The legal description is:
Lots 16 and 17, Block 6, Lots 27, 28, 29 and the east half of Lot 26, Block 7, Lots 1, 2, and 3.
Block 10, Lots 14 and 15, Block 11, and Lots 18 -22, Block 6; and Lots 9 -13, Block 11,_ all in
Dearborn Park, together with adjacent alleys and streets, in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22,
Ramsey County, Minnesota. (The property to be known as Lots 1 -6 of Dearborn Meadow and Lots
- 1 -9 of Dearborn Meadow East)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On May 5, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit.
2. On May 27, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at
the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described
conditional use permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity
With the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to - any person
or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air
pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
18
City Council 05 -27 -03 5
5 . The use would generate only minimal ' vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall .follow the plans approved by the city. The city council may approve-. .
major changes to the plans. The Director of Community Development may approve minor
changes to the plans. Such changes shall include:
a. Revising the grading and, site plans to show:
(1) The developer minimizing the loss or removal of natural vegetation including
keeping and protecting, as many of the trees as possible.
(2) All driveways at least 20 feet wide. If the developer wants to have parking on one
side of the main drive (Castle Place), then it must be at least 28 feet wide.
(3) All parking stalls with a width of at least 9.5 feet and a length of at least 18 feet.
(4) Revised storm water pond locations and designs as suggested or required by the
watershed district or city engineer. The ponds shall meet the city's design standards.
2. The proposed construction (of Dearborn Meadow East) must be substantially started within
one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for
one year.
3. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall
meet all the conditions and changes noted in the engineer's memo dated April. 24, 2003.
4. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in the Dearborn Meadow shall be:
a. Front -yard setback (from a public street or a private driveway): minimum - 20 feet,
maximum - 35 feet
b. Front -yard setback (public side street): minimum - 30 feet, maximum -none
c. Rear -yard setback: 30 feet from any adjacent residential property line
d. Side -yard setback (town houses): minimum - 20 feet from a property line and 20 feet
minimum between buildings.
19
Citv Council 05 -27 -03 6
5. The developer or builder will pay the city Park Access Charges (PAC fees) for each
housing unit at the time of the building permit for each housing unit.
6 . The developer or contractor shall:
a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the ponds, complete all public
improvements and meet all city requirements.
b. Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Remove any debris or junk from the site.
7. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the Dearborn Meadow East preliminary plat based
on the following conditions:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all
city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits..
e. Pay the city for the cost of traffic - control; street identification and no- parking signs.
d. Provide all required and necessary easements (including all utility easements and ten -foot
drainage and utility easements along the front and rear lot lines of each lot and five -foot.
drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines of each lot).
e. Cap and seal any wells on site.
f. Have Xcel Energy install a street light at the. intersection of Castle Avenue and the proposed
private driveway (Castle Place). The exact location and type of light shall be subject to the
city engineer's approval.
g. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easement. These signs shall
mark the edge of the easements and shall state that there shall be no mowing, vegetation
cutting, filling,- grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the sign
design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall
install these signs before the city issues building permits in this plat.
h. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall
include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans shall meet all
the conditions and changes listed in the memo dated April 28, 2003, and shall meet the
following conditions:
20
City Council 05 -27 -03
7
a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code.
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour infornlation for each home site.
The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
(2) Include contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
(3) Show housing pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save
large trees.
(4) Show the proposed street and driveway grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(5) Include the tree plan that:
• Shows where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall
include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
Shows no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
(6) Show drainage areas and the developer's engineer shall provide the city engineer
with the drainage calculations. The drainage design shall accommodate the runoff from
the surrounding areas. The undeveloped parcel to the east of this site shall have
unrestricted access to the storm sewer with a capacity to accommodate post
development runoff.
c. The street and utility plans shall show the:
(1) Water service to each lot and unit.
(2) Repair of Castle. Avenue (street and boulevard) after the developer connects to the
public utilities and builds the private driveways.
3. Paying for costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans.
4. Change the plat as follows:
a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. This shall include a 30-
foot -wide easement for the existing 16 -inch water main and easements for any other existing
utilities on the site. The Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) shall approve the
description and location. of the easement for the water main.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These
easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide
along the side property lines.
c. Label the north/south part of the private driveway as Castle Place, label Castle Street as
Castle Avenue and label the east/west part of the private driveway as Castle Court on all
21
Citv Council 05-27-03 8
plans.
d. Label the common area as Outlot A.
5. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including any off -site drainage
and utility easements.
6. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The
city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or
contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
7. If necessary, obtain a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for
grading.
8. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community
development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
9.*. Submitting the homeowners' association bylaws and rules to the director of community
development.' These are to assure that there will be one responsible art for the maintenance of
p party
the private utilities, driveways and common areas.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or
approves the final plat.
Seconded by, Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Dearborn Meadow East plans date - stamped
A ril 7 2003 site plan, landscape lan , gradiLag and draina a laps and building elevations for
Dearborn Meadow. The city bases this approval on the findin required by the code and the
following conditions:
l . Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
a.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, sidewalk and driveway and
parking lot plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions:
(1) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with city code.
(2) The grading plan shall:
(a) Include building, floor elevation and contour information.
(b) Include contour information for the land that the construction will disturb.
(c) Show sedimentation basins or ponds as may be required by the watershed board or
by the city engineer.
22
City Council 05 -27 -03
(d) Show a berm (two to four feet high) along the south property line of the site.
(3)*. The tree plan shall:
(a) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or tree removal.
(b) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees.. This plan
shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
(c) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous trees
shall be at least two and one half (2 0) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of
red and white oaks and sugar maples.
(d)- Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
(4) All the parking areas and driveways shall have continuous - concrete curb and
gutter except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed. The applicant and
the city engineer shall review the curbing plan to possibly eliminate the right angles
on the east end of Castle Court.
(5) There shall be no parking on one side of the 28- foot -wide driveway (Castle Place).
The developer or contractor shall post Castle Place with no parking signs to meet the
above listed standard. The city will allow parking on Castle Court.
b. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction and have each building staked by a
registered land surveyor.
c. Submit a revised landscape plan to staff for approval that incorporates the following details:
(l) All trees would be consistent with city standards for size, location and species.
(2) Planting (instead of sodding).-the disturbed areas around the wetland with native
grasses and native flowering plants. The native grasses and flowering plants shall be
those needing little or no maintenance and shall extend at least four feet from the
ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the pond. This is to reduce maintenance costs
_ and to reduce the temptation of people mowing into the pond.
(3) The ash trees must be at least 2 ❑inches in caliper, balled and burlapped.
(4) The plantings proposed around the front of the units shown on the landscape plan
date- stamped April 7, 2003, shall remain on the plan.
(5) In addition to the above, the contractor shall sod all front, side and rear yard areas
(except for mulched and edged planting beds and the area within the wetland easement).
(6) The contractor shall restore the Castle Avenue boulevard with sod.
(7) Adding ten more evergreen trees (Black Hills spruce. or Austrian pines) to the
proposed evergreen trees along the north and south property lines of the site. These
23
Citv Council 05-27 -03 10
trees are to be at least six feet tall and the contractor shall plant these trees in staggered
rows on the berm. This shall include adding trees between proposed Units 7 and 8 at the
northeast corner of the site.
d. Present a color scheme for the buildings with a variety of colors to staff for approval.
e. Present a revised building plan for staff approval that shows brick wainscoting on the north
sides of all the units that are along Castle Avenue.
f. If necessary, get an access permit from MnDOT for the driveways that will be on Castle
Avenue (as MnDOT has not turned Castle Avenue back to the city).
g. Provide the city with a letter of credit or cash escrow for all required exterior improvements.
The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work.
3. Complete the following before occupying each building:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Sod all landscaped areas, except for the area within
the easement, which may be seeded.
c. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter along all interior driveways and around all open
parking stalls.
d. The developer or contractor shall:
(1) Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
(2) Remove any debris or junk from the site.
e. Put. addresses on each building for each unit.
f. Provide a driveway turn around for Lot 7 on Castle Avenue.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all
required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished
exterior improvements by June 1 if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter, or
within six weeks of occupancy of the- building if occupancy is in the spring or summer.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All
24
Citv Council 05 -27 -03 11
Agenda #
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Schroeder Milk Expansion - Financing Plan Revision
LOCATION: 2080 Rice Street
DATE: July 7, 2003
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Wdli ;d
Rejected
Schroeder Milk Company is constructing a three -phase expansion of their milk processing
business at 2080 Rice Street. As part of their expansion proposal, Schroeder Milk asked the city
to provide tax - increment financing -(TIF) to help pay for site improvements and utilities. The use of
TIF on their site, however, required city approval of amendments to the existing city tax - increment
financing plans.
.The city approved the use of TIF and the necessary development agreement between Schroeder
Milk and the city in 2001. Schroeder Milk is now asking the city to change one paragraph of the
existing agreement to more accurately reflect the original intent of the financing approval.
BACKGROUND
On June 28, 1999, the city council made three approvals for the expansion of Schroeder Milk.
These approvals included:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for their proposed expansions. The city code requires a CUP
for dairy product processing and distribution facilities.
2. The site, landscaping and building design plans.
3. Preliminary approval of the tax - increment financing plan to help pay for the expansion.
DISCUSSION
The proposed changes to the development agreement are to clarify when the two -year time limit
was to start and to clarify the language about the wages of the employees. (See the proposed
amendment to the development agreement starting on page two.) As proposed, the two -year time
limit for paying the employees is to start when the project construction is completed -not when the
plan was approved. The second change clarifies that the wages Schroeder Milk is to pay the.
employees is an average at least $15.00 per hour - not a minimum of $15.00 per hour.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution starting on page four. This resolution authorizes the proposed changes to the
existing development and financing agreement between Schroeder Milk and Maplewood.
p:sec181shromilk rev 2003.doc
Attachments:
1. Proposed Amendment to Development Agreement
2. Proposed Resolution
Attachment 1
FIRST AMENDMENT To DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO ,DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment "), dated as
of the day of July, 2003, by and between the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA (the "City "), a
municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, and SCHROEDER MILK CO., a
Minnesota corporation (the "Developer ")
WITNESSES:
WHEREAS, the City and the Developer have entered into a Development Agreement, dated as of
August 27, 2001 (the "Development Agreement ") in connection with the construction of an approximately
55,000 square foot expansion of the Developer's existing manufacturing facility in the City; and
WHEREAS, both the Developer and the City intended that the jobs required to be created under the
City's business subsidy policy have an average wage of $15 per hour with skilled positions paid at a higher
wage and unskilled positions paid at a lower wage; and
WHEREAS, both the Developer and the City intended that - the benefit date for business subsidy be
designated as the date the Project was completed as provided by the Business Subsidy Law, Minnesota
Statutes, Section 116J.993 through 116J.995; and
WHEREAS, the Developer and the City have determined that modifications to the business
.subsidy provisions in the Development Agreement are necessary to reflect these intentions; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Developer wish to amend the Development Agreement as provided in
this Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Developer have both duly authorized the Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Development Agreement is amended as provided herein.
1. Section 3.4(1) of the Development Agreement is amended and restated as follows:
"(1 } In order- to satisfy the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 1161993 to 116J.995 (the
"Business Subsidies Act "), the Developer acknowledges and agrees that the amount of the "Business
Subsidy" granted to the Developer under this Agreement is the Reimbursement Amount which is the costs
of the Site Improvements paid by the Developer and reimbursed by Tax Increments and that the Business
Subsidy is needed because the Project is not sufficiently feasible for the Developer to undertake without the
Business Subsidy. The Tax Increment District is an economic development district and the public purpose
of the Business Subsidy is to encourage the construction of manufacturing facilities in the City. The
Developer agrees that it will meet the following goals (the "Goals"): It will create at least 30 full time jobs
in connection with the development of the Development Property at an average hourly wage of at least.
$15.00 per hour within two years from the "Benefit Date ", which is the date the Project is completed by the
Developer."
2. Except as herein amended, all terms and provisions of the Development Agreement as
originally executed as of August 27, 2001 shall remain in full force and effect.
1546869v1 S -1
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed on the date first Written above.
SCHROEDER MILK CO.
B
Its
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
By:
Mayor
B
City Clerk
1546869v1 S -2
3
Attachment 2
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
HELD: July 14, 2003
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 14th
day. of July, 2003, at o'clock p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City") and
Schroeder Milk Co. (the "Developer ") have entered into a Development Agreement, dated as of August
27 2001 (the "Development Agreement ") in connection with the construction of an approximately 55,000
square foot expansion of the Developer's existing manufacturing facility in the City;
B. WHEREAS, both the Developer and the City intended that the jobs required to be created
under the City's business subsidy policy have an average wage of $15 per hour with skilled positions paid
at a higher wage and unskilled positions paid at a lower wage; and
C. WHEREAS, both the Developer and the City intended that the benefit date for business
subsidy be designated as the date the Project was completed as provided by the Business Subsidy Law,
Minnesota Statutes, Section 1161993 through 1161995; and
D. ' WHEREAS, the Developer and the City have determined that modifications to the
business subsidy provisions in the Development Agreement are necessary to reflect these intentions; and
E. VaMREAS, the City and the Developer wish to amend the Development Agreement;
NOW, TBEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, as follows:
The City Council hereby approves the First Amendment to Development Agreement in
substantially the form submitted, and the Mayor and City Clerk. are hereby authorized and directed to
execute the First Amendment to Development Agreement on behalf of the City.
1546871vl 4
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and, after full discussion thereof, and upon a vote being taken thereof, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Adopted this 14th day of July, 2003.
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
1546871v1 5
STATE OF SOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes with the ori ginal minutes of a meeting of the City Council City held on the
date therein indicated, which are on file and of record in my office, and the same is a full, true and
complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a Resolution Authorizing the Execution of an
Amendment to Development Agreement.
WITNESS my hand as such. Clerk of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this
day of July, 2003.
City Clerk
1546871v1 6
Agenda,#
REPORT SUMMARY
Applicant: Jerianne Cullen and Doua Lee
Site Address: 2492 Highwood Avenue
Land Use Request: Home Occupation Renewal
Zoning: Farm Residence
Land Use: Single Dwelling Residential
City Council Hearing Date: July 14, 2003
Project Description: Last year the city council approved a home occupation
license for Jerianne Cullen and Doua Lee to operate a sewing business from
their barn on their residential property at 2492 Highwood Avenue. The business,
called Home Based Industries, Inc.,. includes sewing clothing and bags for
various companies.
Request: One -year review of a home occupation license.
Recommendations: Staff recommends renewal of the applicants' home
occupation license by the city council, with future yearly reviews conducted by
city staff as required by code.
WAN
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
Richard Fursman, City Manager
Shann Finwall, Associate Planner
Home Occupation License Renewal
Jerianne Cullen and Doua Lee
2492 Highwood Avenue
July 7, 2003
Jerianne Cullen and Doua Lee have been operating a sewing business from 2492 Highwood
Avenue since October 2002. The business, called dome Based Industries, Inc., is conducted in
the applicants' barn located on their residential property. The applicants are the only two
employees in the home occupation,. which includes sewing clothing and bags for various
companies.
CODE REQUIREMENT
The city's home occupation ordinance required the applicants to obtain a home occupation
license for their business because they would be processing a product from their residential
property for more than 30 days a year. The ordinance further states that each license holder
shall apply to the city clerk each January for renewal. Prior to issuance of a license renewal, the
city shall determine that: all licensing conditions and city ordinances are being met.
BACKGROUND
On June 10, 2002, the city council approved Jerianne Cullen's and Doua Lee's home occupation
license to conduct a sewing shop business from 2492 Highwood Avenue. The city council
approved the license with ten conditions (refer to the June 10, 2002, city council minutes
attached) .
On August 26, 2002, the applicants obtained an electrical permit from the city in order to upgrade
the electrical system in the barn to accommodate their sewing business.
October 2002 the applicants moved their business from their previous location in St. Paul to their
barn at 2492 Highwood Avenue.
DISCUSSION
The applicants have completed interior finish work in the lower level of the barn to create a
pleasant workplace. To address the adjacent neighbors' concerns, the applicants have cleared
exterior storage from the south side of the barn, and discontinued parking a truck and plow in
sight of the neighbors' back yard. This summer the applicants will paint the barn, and in the
future install new, or refurbished windows. ,
Cullen /Lee Home Occupation 1 July 7, 2003
One condition of the June 10, 2002, home occupation license approval included that the city
council review the license again in one year. The city's home occupation ordinance does not
require yearly reviews by the city council, only yearly renewals which are reviewed by city staff.
The condition for a one -year city council review was added due to the number of neighborhood
concerns expressed over the possibility that the home occupation would expand into a large
business.
Ms. Cullen and Ms. Lee both live on the premises and are the only employees in the home
occupation. Since the applicants began operating their business from their residential property in
October, no complaints have been received by the city regarding the business. In fact, the
neighbors to the south, Mr. and Mrs. Sauka at 1016 Sterling Street, have indicated to staff that
they cannot tell that there is a business in the barn. The Saukas also state that the removal of
the truck and exterior storage have improved the view of the barn from their property.
The Saukas have also been working with the applicants to purchase a 10 -foot strip of land in
order to expand their attached garage. Once the minor subdivision is final, the Saukas have
agreed to install the six required evergreen trees between the barn and the .Saukas' back yard.
These trees were- a condition of the applicants' home occupation license, based on the Saukas'
concerns over the visibility of the back door of the barn and storage of the applicants. and
plow.
SUMMARY
The applicants' business has had no negative impacts on the surrounding residential properties.
The applicants have complied with all conditions of the home occupation license, including size
limits, hours of deliveries and customers, and exterior storage restrictions. Outstanding .
conditions include painting the barn and planting six evergreen trees. The applicants propose to
paint the barn over the summer months. The Saukas have agreed to install the trees if they
pursue the minor subdivision. Staff will continue to monitor these conditions until complete.
Staff finds that the restrictions in place have proven adequate to ensure that the business will not
expand as feared by some neighbors. For this reason, staff recommends renewal of the
applicants' home occupation license by the city council, with future yearly reviews conducted by
city staff as required by code.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the renewal of Jerianne Cullen's and Doua Lee's home occupation license for a sewing
business at 2492 Highwood Avenue. This approval shatl be subject to the following conditions
(changes to the original. conditions are underlined if added and stricken if deleted):
1. Compliance with all conditions of the city's home occupation ordinance to include that the
area of the home occupation is limited in size to 20 percent of the combined area of the
house and barn.
2. Deliveries and customer hours are limited from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday.
3. All customer pick -ups and other deliveries are restricted to the garage door located on the
west side of the barn.
4. The applicants must obtain all necessary building permits for the renovation of the barn.
Cullen /Lee Home Occupation 2 July 7, 2003
5. At a minimum, the renovation of the barn should include painting the entire barn one solid
color.
6. The renovation of the barn cannot include any additional windows on the south side of the
barn, unless the applicants can prove that no noise associated with the home occupation
will be generated through the windows onto the adjacent residential properties.
7. The applicants must remove all exterior storage from the south side of the barn..
8. To help screen the barn from the residential property to the south (1016 Sterling Street
South) the applicants must install six, 6- foot -high evergreen trees between the barn and
the east property line. Since these trees would benefit the owners of 1016 Sterling Street,
this requirement may be dropped if the owners of 1016 Sterlinq Street agree in writing that
they do not want the trees planted or if they agree to plant the trees themselves.
9. Any garbage container associated with the business must be stored in the barn or
screened from view of the adjacent residential properties.
10. There shall be no more than seven sewing machines located in the barn.
p /sec13- 28 /cuilen
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. June 10, 2002, City Council Minutes
Cullen /Lee Home Occupation 3 July 7, 2003
1�
Locatol
4
Attachment 1
on Map
Attachment2
anuaAIV P00AIR21 H
N
W E Site Plan
S
5'
2492 Highwood Avenue
•�
(Property outlined in bold).
A
A
W
Pfau undo
CA
M
W
Q.
a do
a q-MC,
�. asnoH
Ulu
V, ASS£
Location of Horne Occupation
C) -
'
V
Asa l
I�In�
N
W E Site Plan
S
5'
Attachment 3
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 10, 2002
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 02 -12
2. 7:20 (7:45 P.M.) Home Occupation License - Sewing Business (2492 Highwood Avenue)
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. Assistant Community Development .Director Ekstrand presented the specifics of the report.
c. Commissioner Fisher presented the Planning Commission Report.
e. Mayor- Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Jerry Cullen, applicant, 2492 Highwood Avenue, Maplewood
Dave Hafner, 1037 Marie Street, Maplewood
Dean Wohlhuter, 1024 Marie, Maplewood
Tom Selca, 1016 Sterling Street, Maplewood
Dave Klemens, 1048 Marie Street, Maplewood
Orvill Sether, 962 Mamie Street, Maplewood
Will Rossbach, County Road C, Maplewood
Bob Zick, 1880 E. Shore Drive, Maplewood
Dick Schmidt, 2459 Mamie Street, Maplewood
Ed Locher, 1000 Mamie Street, Maplewood
Dave Bj ork, 2511 Highwood Ave., Maplewood
Joe Drevnick, "Kitty Corner" to applicant
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the home occupation license for Jerianne Cullen and
Doua .Lee of 2492 Highwood Avenue to conduct a sewing . shop business from the barn on their
residential Proper�t
This approval shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with all conditions of the city's home occupation ordinance to include that the area of the
home occupation is limited in size to 20 percent of the combined area of the house and. barn.
2. Deliveries and customer hours are limited from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday.
3. All customer pick -ups and other deliveries are restricted to the garage door located on the west side of
the barn.
4. The applicants must obtain all necessary building permits for the renovation of the barn.
5. At a minimum, the renovation of the barn should to include painting the entire barn one solid color.
6. The renovation of the barn cannot include any additional windows on the south side of the barn,
unless the applicants can prove that no noise associated with the home occupation will be generated
through the windows onto the adjacent residential properties.
70 The applicants must remove all exterior storage from the south side of the barn.
80 To help screen the barn from the residential property to the south (1016 Sterling Street South) the
applicants must install six, 6 -foot high, evergreen trees between the barn and the east property line.
9. Any garbage container associated with the business must be stored in the barn or screened. from view
of the adjacent residential properties.
10. There shall be no more than seven sewing machines located in the barn.
11. The city council will review this home occupation license in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
7
r .
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
RE: Temporary Gambling Resolution
DATE: July 7, 2003
Agenda Item #
Action by Count
Date
dified
Rejected
Ery Carlson, on behalf of the Maplewood Athletic Association, has applied for a temporary
gambling license to conduct a raffle to raise funds for Robert Kelly. Mr. Kelly was severely
injured in a car accident after being hit by a drunk driver. The raffle will be held at the Midway
Stadium in St. Paul on August 17, 2003. In order for the State of Minnesota to issue a
temporary license, approval of the following resolution from the City is required.
RESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the
temporary premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Maplewood Athletic
Association.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the
timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control
Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in
compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of
Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
;i
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Assistant Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Woodlyn Ponds Twin Homes
LOCATION: Between County Road D and Woodlyn Avenue
APPLICANT: Mendota Homes, Inc.
DATE: July 9, 2003
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Agenda #
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
J
Ms. Erin Mathern, of Mendota Homes, Inc., is proposing to build a 26 -unit twin -home development
on a 5.2 -acre parcel between County Road D and Woodlyn Avenue. The proposed development
would have 10 buildings fronting on .a private roadway running south from County Road D to the
Xcel power line easement. There would also be three twin homeslfronting on Woodlyn Avenue
south of the Xcel easement. Refer to the maps and narrative on pages 15 -31.
The proposed twin homes would each have two -car, front- facing garages. They would be sided
with no- maintenance vinyl horizontal -lap siding, vinyl shake detailing beneath the gable peaks and
brick wainscot on the front of the garages. The applicant has included three optional front -
. elevation designs as well. Refer to the building elevation reduction on pages 23 - 25 or the larger
.plans (separate attachment).
Requests
The applicant is requesting that the city approve:
1. A wetland buffer variance, since they propose to displace two small wetlands and mitigate
them within the site. They would also incorporate a third wetland into a large wetland they
would create beneath the power lines.
2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD). The applicant is
proposing this project as a PUD since they would be platting this as a townhome
development and not create individual 12,000 - square -foot double - dwelling lots as specified
in the ordinance for twin homes.
3. A preliminary plat.
4. The project design plans.
BACKGROUND
Recent Housing Developments in this Neighborhood
February 14, 2000: The city council approved the last three buildings to be constructed in the
Woodlyn Heights Townhome development on Woodlyn Avenue west of McKnight Road. The first
of the remaining three three- plexes is under construction.
1
October 9, 2000: The city council approved the 60 -unit Birch Glen Apartments on the west side of
the proposed twin -home site. This development is completed and units are available for rent.
April 28, 2003: The city council approved the 100 -unit Sibley Cove Apartments located south of
County Road D between White Bear Avenue and Ariel Street.
DISCUSSION
Wetland Buffer Variance
There are three depressions on the site that the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District
has classified as Class 4 wetlands. The northerly and southerly ones would be removed as part of
this development. The middle one, under the power lines, would be incorporated into a
considerably larger wetland. Refer to the grading /drainage plan on page 20 or the full -sized plan
(separate - attachment). The watershed district has approved the proposed changes and has
issued a permit already to the applicant. Refer to their letter on page 32.
At the June 2 planning commission meeting, Commissioner Rossbach stated that when the
planning commission reviews this proposal, he will recommend that there not be any net loss of
wetland buffer by the removal of the existing wetlands. I spoke to Cliff Aichinger of the watershed
district. He concurred and suggested that the applicant provide a 25 -foot buffer around the
proposed wetland, equivalent to the required Class 4 wetland buffer requirement. (The code
requires an average buffer width of 25 feet with a 20 -foot minimum.) I measured the perimeter of
the existing three wetlands and the perimeter of the proposed wetland. The existing wetlands
have a combined distance of 740 linear feet of buffer surrounding them measured 25 feet from the
wetland edge.. The perimeter of the proposed wetland, also measured 25 feet from the proposed
wetland edge, is 750 linear feet. Staff also compared the gain in wetland area between the three
existing wetlands and the proposed mitigated wetland. The total area of the existing wetlands
equals 6,600 square feet. The proposed wetland would have 17,200 square feet of area. This is
an increase of 62 percent.
A question came up at the planning commission meeting as to whether the proposed wetland
would have an equivalent width of. buffer to those being removed. Tina Carstens of the watershed
district explained that the district felt that the buffer around the proposed wetland, as well as the
wetland itself, would be substantial improvements over the existing ones. The three existing
wetlands, in fact, do not show up- on their wetland inventory. The proposed replacement would be
an improvement over the existing three depressions and would be a benefit for wildlife along with
the wetland vegetation to be required as part of this created wetland improvement.
The applicant is requesting a variance because they propose to replace the existing wetlands with
the larger proposed one. The wetland ordinance allows the city council to approve variances and
states that the council may require that the applicant_ mitigate any buffer alteration. Staff agrees
with the applicant's proposed mitigation plan and, as stated in the watershed district's letter, feels
that they would be improving the quality of wetlands on this site. Staff recommends that the 25-
foot average -width buffer around this new pond be planted with native wetland - vegetation (code
requirement for mitigated buffers).
2
Drainage /City Engineer's Comments
In addition to the wetland pond proposed, the applicant is proposing a storm water treatment pond
on the uphill side. This pond will collect and treat storm water runoff from the majority of the site
before it enters the wetland. The runoff from the three building sites to the south will flow directly
to the new wetland.
I have included a copy of Chris Cavett's and Erin Schacht's report from our engineering -
department's review. They have addressed grading, erosion control, storm sewers, drainage, the
private street, utilities and trail /sidewalk easements. Please refer to pages 34-36.
In brief, their main concerns are:
• The need for proper turf establishment and slope stabilization.
• The use of proper native seed mixes for the wetland area.
• The applicant should dedicate 10 -foot drainage and utility easements on all sides of each
lot.
• The applicant should dedicate a 10 -foot pedestrian easement along the northerly edge of
the site for the relocation of the bituminous trail and relocate the bituminous trail within this
easement.
Regarding the bituminous trail, this trail did not follow the required and proper setback from County
Road D when it was installed, because of objections from the previous owner. Now is the
opportunity to correct this matter and .provide an increased trail setback from the street edge.
Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development
Densit
This proposal complies with the R2 designation in the land use plan and meets density
requirements. The land use plan allows a maximum density of six units per acre for a total of 30
dwelling units. The proposed 26 units are under this limit.
Compatibility
The proposed twin -home use is compatible with the adjacent properties. It would provide an
appropriate transition between the Birch Glen Apartments to the west and the Maplewood open
space property to the east. It would also be an appropriate fit with the Village on Woodlyn seniors
housing and the Salvation Army Church to the south and with the two houses to the north across
County Road D. These homes, however, are on lots planned for BC (business commercial). If the
city gets a commercial - development application for these parcels, we will work toward minimizing
any negative impact on the twin homes.
The applicant has applied for a PUD for the proposed lot widths and lot sizes. The code requires
that double dwelling lots be at least 85 feet wide and have at least 12,000 square feet of area.
These requirements are meant to apply when a twin home would be built on a lot in a typical
3
single - family neighborhood. The city code does not have provisions for twin homes within
townhome developments, although we have approved several such developments. One recent
development. is the Dearborn Meadow twin. home plat on the south side of Highway 36 east of
White Bear Avenue. Another is the Holloway Ponds twin -home townhome development on
Holloway Avenue and Beebe Road. A homeowners association would own and maintain the
common areas including the private driveway and parking lot.
PUD Criteria /Flexibility
Section 36- 438(b) of the city code states it is the. intent. of the PUD code to provide a means to
allow flexibility by substantial deviations from the provisions of this chapter, including uses,
setbacks, height and other regulations. Deviations may be granted for planned unit developments
provided that:
1. Certain regulations contained in this chapter should not apply to the proposed development
because of its unique nature.
2. The PUD would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter.
3. The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to
that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter.
4. The deviations would not constitute a significant threat to the property values, safety,
health or welfare of the owners or occupants of nearby land.
5. The deviations are required for reasonable and practicable physical development and are
not required solely for financial reasons.
Staff feels that the proposed plan would create an attractive townhome development. of double
dwellings that would blend into this existing neighborhood creating an appropriate transition
between ,neighboring land uses.
Preliminary Plat
As proposed, the 26 units on' the 5.2 -acre site means there would be five units per acre —an
average of 8,712 square feet per unit. This is consistent with the density standards in the
comprehensive plan for double dwelling residential development and is well above the 6,000-
square-foot minimum. lot area that the city requires for each unit in a double dwelling.
The applicant is proposing a private roadway from County Road D. This roadway measures about
21 feet in width from curb -to -curb (inside edge to inside edge). The minimum roadway width
required for a two -way roadway is 24 feet_ The applicant should be able to accommodate this
within their 27.63 -foot roadway area.
Staff recommends that the "outlot' designations on the plat be changed to "lots" to create a
common- interest community. We have seen in the past where outlots have gone tax - delinquent
which can result in unmaintained property or property that becomes available at county auction.
Granted, this occurrence is very unlikely. Staff feels, though, that it is a. good practice for this and
future such developments to designate common areas as lots vs. outlots.
El
Traffic
A representative from the Salvation Army Church expressed concern over the existing traffic
congestion along White Bear Avenue and in the Maplewood Mall area in general. One neighbor
on Lydia Avenue also expressed concern that the traffic was turning Lydia Avenue into a
"freeway." The city engineer does not feel that the proposed 20 dwelling units that would enter at
County Road D and the six on Woodlyn Avenue would have any significant affect on the traffic.
Noise Analysis
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MnPCA) requires that the proposed dwelling units not be
impacted by noise over specific levels. If the freeway noise exceeds these levels, the applicant
should dampen the noise within the units by methods like installing sound - reducing windows,
better wall insulation and by providing air conditioning. The applicant is having a noise analysis
performed to evaluate freeway noise impact.
Design
Architectural
The applicant has proposed roof design options that would provide some architectural variation
within the project from building to building. This is illustrated in the streetscape drawing on page
26 and on Sheet Al of the elevation drawings, The exterior materials would be consistent from
building to building. The applicant would mix color schemes for variety. All color ranges would be
neutral tones such as tan., cream., taupe, gray and brown.
One comment made by the planning commission was concern about the prominent garage views
from the front of these structures. As proposed, there would be very little dwelling visible from the
front. Garage doors would be a prominent feature. Staff concurs with the planning commission's
point about this, but also recognizes the difficulty the applicant has had by trying to fit this
development onto this .long, narrow site.
As an attempt to dress up the architectural appeal from the public views, staff recommends that
the applicant enhance the elevations facing County Road D and Woodlyn Avenue. More wide use
of brick should be utilized along with the shake, trim and siding details already proposed.
Deck Encroachments
Staff has one concern with the proposed building placement_ The rear decks on the three
southerly buildings would be within the Xcel power line easement. The applicant should obtain
written approval from Xcet verifying that they will allow the deck encroachments. The city council
made the same requirement of the developer of the Woodlyn Heights town houses to the east.
Tree Replacement and Landscaping
Tree Replacement
The applicant prepared a tree survey. Of the 78 large trees on the site, 30 were found to be
significant trees according to our ordinance. These trees are of the following species: American
Elm, Norway Spruce, White Spruce, Silver Maple, Austrian Pine, Crabapple, Green Ash, Blue
5
Spruce, Paper Birch and European Mountain Ash. Other large trees on the site are species such
as: Boxelder, Cottonwood, Black Locust and Siberian Elm. To comply with the city's tree -
replacement. requirements, the applicant must. plant 30 replacement trees. They show 11.7 new
trees on their landscape plan. The applicant would surpass the tree- replacement requirements.
Landscaping
The proposed landscaping is shown on two drawings. There is an overall plan showing new trees
around the site. The other drawing is more specific in showing the proposed plantings around
each building. Staff finds the proposed landscaping acceptable.
Site Considerations
Sidewalks /Trails
The applicant should provide a sidewalk along the southerly lot line as was required of the
Woodlyn Heights Towrihomes to the east. This will complete this ' section of future sidewalk on the
north side of Il1/oodlyn Avenue.
The existing bituminous trail along the north side of the site should be relocated closer to the
applicant's property as discussed above.
Site - Lighting Plan
The city code does not require a site - lighting plan for double dwellings, so none has been
requested.
Roadway Width
The private roadway should be widened to 24 feet, which is the minimum width for two -way traffic.
This roadway should also be posted for "no parking" on either side. The fire marshal, furthermore,
requires a 20- foot -wide unobstructed drive for emergency vehicles.
Visitor Parking Lot
The applicant has proposed a seven -space visitor parking lot at the south end of their private
roadway. Staff feels that this is a good idea though it would not be useful for the northerly six
buildings. Staff is also concerned that the homeowners association should make sure that it does
not. become a storage lot for RVs, boats, trailers, etc.
Barbed Wire Fence
There is an old barbed wire fence on the east, west and south sides of the site. The applicant
should remove these as part of their site development.
Police and Fire Comments
Butch Gervais, the Maplewood Fire Marshal, stated that the north -south roadway must be at least
20 feet wide. Likewise, the shared drive serving the southerly six units must also be at
least 20 feet wide. The driveway in front of the easterly building narrows to 18.5 feet. Mr. Gervais
•e
will accept this as long as this driveway is kept clear of snow and parking is not permitted within
this drive.
Deputy Chief Banick sees no public safety concerns with this proposal.
Building Official's Comments
Dave Fisher, the Maplewood Building Official, stated the following:
• This project must comply with the International Residential Code. Some of the units may
need to be handicapped accessible.
• If retaining walls are over four feet tall, they must be designed by a structural engineer and
have a separate building permit..
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
June 16, 2003: The planning commission recommended approval of the variance, PUD and
preliminary plat.
June 25, 2003: The community design review board tabled their review of the design plans and
directed the applicant to make architectural revisions to enhance the buildings.
July S, 2003: The community design .review board reviewed this item again and moved approval
of the. design plans subject to the conditions in this :report.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution beginning on page 37 approving a wetland buffer variance for the Woodlyn
Ponds Twin Homes. Approval is based on the following findings:
1. The variance will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the applicant
will replace three small., poorer - quality wetlands with a larger, better - quality wetland,
2. Strict enforcement of the code, by requiring the preservation of the existing wetlands, would
not result in the best use and layout of the property and would, therefore, cause undue
hardship. The three subject wetlands are not of a nature that they would be an asset to the
site for either water retention or wildlife habitat. In this instance, it is an advantage to the
developer, as well as the city, to create a useable and aesthetic wetland in lieu of the existing
ones..
Approval is conditioned upon the applicant doing the following:
a. Revise the site plan to provide a wetland- protection buffer around the proposed
wetland. This buffer must be an average of 25 feet wide with a minimum width of 20
feet.
b. Dedicate a wetland buffer easement to the City of Maplewood prior to obtaining a
grading permit for the project.
7
c. Install wetland- protection buffer signs around the buffer before the first unit is occupied
which states, "WETLAND BUFFER AREA —Da NOT MOW, CUT, DUMP, DISTURB
BEYOND THIS POINT —CITY OF MAPLEWOOD." These signs shall be installed not
more than 100 feet apart.
d. Provide a planting plan for the.wetland buffer to be approved by the watershed district.
This plan shall consist of a proposal to plant the buffer with native wetland vegetation.
B. Adopt the resolution starting on page 39 approving a conditional use permit for a planned unit
development for the Woodlyn Ponds Twin Homes. This approval is based on the findings for
approval listed in the ordinance and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped May 20, 2003. The city council may _
approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor
changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval
or the permit shall end.. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant shall provide a noise evaluation for this site to determine if freeway noise
would impact their proposed units above the maximum noise levels required by the
MnPCA. If freeway noise does exceed these levels, the applicant shall reduce the outside
noise within the units.
6. The homeowners association documents shall state that the visitor parking lot shall be kept
open for visitor parking and shall not be a storage area for RVs, trailers, campers and the
like.
6. The applicant shall .post the north -south private roadway for no parking on both sides.
C. Approve the Woodlyn Ponds Twin Homes preliminary plat date - stamped May 20, 2003. The
developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
b. Pay the city for the cost of traffic - control street identification and no- parking signs.
c. Provide all required and necessary easements, including ten -foot drainage and utility
easements around the perimeter of the property, the wetland buffer easement and the
10 -foot pedestrian easement along the north of the property.
d. Cap and seal any wells on site.
E'�
e. Have Xcel Energy install street lights. The exact location and type of light shall be
subject to the city engineer's approval.
f. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easement. These signs
shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state that there shall be no mowing,
vegetation cutting, falling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve
the sign design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or
contractor shall install these signs before the city issues building permits in this plat.
g. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
2. *Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans
shall meet all the conditions and changes listed in the Engineering Plan Review memo
dated June 6, 2003.
3. Paying for costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans.
This escrow amount is $1,000.
4. `Label the common areas as "lots" instead of "outlots."
5. Obtain a. permit from the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District for grading. Also
obtain MnPCA and NPEDS (National Pollution Elimination Discharge System) permits.
5. if the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community
development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
7. Submitting the homeowners association bylaws and rules to the director of community
development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the
maintenance of the private utilities, driveways and common areas. The applicant shall
submit these prior to obtaining a building permit.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or
approves the final plat.
D. Approve the architectural and site plans date- stamped July 1, 2003, and the landscape plans
date - stamped May 20, .2003 for the Woodlyn Ponds Twin Homes on County Road D.
Approval is subject to the developer complying with the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Complete the following before the city issues a grading permit:
a_ Have the city engineer approve final engineering plans, subject to compliance with
the Maplewood Engineering Plan Review dated June 6, 2003 from the staff report.
This data shall be considered an addendum to these conditions.
b. Dedicate a 25 -foot (average width) wetland- protection buffer easement to the City of
Maplewood around the proposed wetland.. This buffer may narrow to 20 feet.
M
c. Provide a revised landscape plan for the wetland - protection buffer for approval by the
Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District and the city engineer.
d. Provide written approval from Xcel for any deck encroachment into their easement.
e. Provide engineering data for the retaining wall if the height would exceed four feet.
3. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
a. Provide revised north building elevations for the townhouses adjacent County Road D to
include a brick wainscot or other brick enhancement. This is subject to staff approval.
b. Install wetland- protection buffer signs around the wetland buffer edge which states,
"WETLAND BUFFER AREA —DO NOT MOW, CUT, DUMP, DISTURB BEYOND THIS
POINT —CITY OF MAPLEWOOD." These signs shall be installed not more than 100 feet
apart.
c. The north -south private roadway shall have continuous concrete curb and gutter. This
roadway shall be 24 feet wide and be posted for "no parking" on both sides.
d. The 18.5 -foot east driveway in front of Lots 5 & 6 by Woodlyn Avenue shall be kept
free of snow and posted for "no parking ".
e. Submit a lawn- irrigation plan to staff showing the location of sprinkler heads. (code
requirement)
f. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction.
g. Get the necessary approvals and permits from the watershed district..
h. Provide the city with verification that the units will meet all state noise standards. This
shall be with a study, testing or other documentation. If the noise levels on this site
violate any of the state standards, then the contractor will have to construct the
building so that it can meet the noise standards. This may be done with thicker walls,
heavier windows, requiring air conditioning or other sound- deadening construction
methods The developer shall- provide the city with this documentation before the city
will issue a building permit for the building.
i. A cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements.
The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work.
4. Relocate the bituminous trail: to the south to widen: the boulevard and to align the trail
away from the street edge.
5. Complete the following:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
c. install a reflectorized stop sign at County Road D.
10
d. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas.
e. Install streetlights at the County Road Q roadway connection, at the end of the private
roadway by the visitor parking lot and at the Woodlyn Avenue driveway connection.
f. Remove the old barbed wire fencing around the perimeter of the site.
g. The .landscape islands located between the town houses., in the driveways, on the
y
July 1, 2003, site plan are optional for the developer.
h. Install a sidewalk along the Woodlyn Avenue frontage as required in the assistant city
eng- i neer's report.
6. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The above - required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the city for all required
exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished
landscaping by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six
weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished
work.
7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
11
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed 26 property owners within 350 feet of the site about the proposal. We received
seven replies. Three property owners had no objection, two were in favor and two objected.
No objection
1. I have no objections knowing that these units will be "for sale." (Howard Rekstad, the
Village on Woodlyn)
2. No problems to us. (Tinh Zuan Le and Thu Huong Thi Nguyen, 2091 Lydia Avenue)
3. No reservations for this project. (Edward and Helen Dorle, 3745 South Hills Drive)
In Favor.
1. The development of the proposed Mendota twin homes would blend the area from the
apartments to the residential single family homes, which would enhance the community.
This is an excellent proposal! (Jerome and Patricia Parker, 72866 Ingersol Avenue)
2. Twin homes seem like an appropriate use for the property. (Tom Schuette, Plaza 3000
Shopping Center)
Opposed
1. We have serious concerns in regards to traffic flow. We already have a very difficult time
trying to get onto White Bear Avenue, especially during the holidays, just to get to the 694
interstate and we are only a couple blocks away. What (how) are they going to handle
this problem? (Salvation Army)
2. Refer to the written response on page 33 from Douglas and Sherri Sporre.
12
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Lot Area: 5.2 acres
Existing Use: Vacant (the single dwelling previously on this site has been removed)
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: County Road D and two single dwellings on property planned BC
East: Undeveloped Maplewood open space land and the Bruentrup Farm
South: Lydia Avenue, the Salvation Army church and the Village on Woodlyn
West: Birch Glen Apartments
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
Land Use Plan Designation: R2
Zoning: F (farm residential)
Criteria for variance Approval
State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
Undue hardship, as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means the property in
question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official
controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created
by the' landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the
property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
Criteria for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(x) states that the city council may grant a CUP, subject to the nine standards for
approval. Refer to the resolution starting on page 39.
APPLICATION DATE
We received the complete application and plans for this proposal on May 20, 2003. State law
requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal.
City council action is required on this proposal by July 19, 2003, unless the applicant agrees to a
time extension.
13
p: sec2n /MendotaHomes.6 -03
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Area Map
3. Land Use Plan Map
4. Property Line /Zoning Map
5. Preliminary Plat
6. Preliminary Plat Denoting the Existing Wetlands
7. Overall Site Landscape Plan
8. Foundation Planting Plan
9. Building Elevations
10. Woodlyn Ponds Streetscape Drawing
11. Applicant's Letter of Variance Justification dated May 14, 2003
12. Applicant's Letter of Conditional Use Permit Justification dated May 14, 2003
13. Letter from the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District dated April 21, 2003
14. Survey Response from Douglas and Sherri Sporre dated May 27, 2003
15. Maplewood Engineering Plan Review dated June 6, 2043
16. Variance Resolution
17. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
18. Plans date - stamped May 20, 2003 (separate attachment)
14
Attachment 2
PERKINS
2075 ❑ 2091
20 o M 2 $ OFFICES 0
n CD
EMERALD INN
COUNTY ROAD D E
CHILDRENS WORLD E:l
2-336
PROPOSED::
MENDOTA:
HOMES
SIBLEY COVE TWIN-HOME'
APARTMENTS a SITE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD�
ITE < OPEN SPACE
LAND
W . 0 ZONED:
F ( FARM
RESIDENTIAL
0 .
PLANNED:
M
R2 (DOUBLE
DWELLING
RESIDENTIAL
0
2029 cor):
-PLAZA 3000
NORTH ANNEX
wwvnmw� WOODLYNN A VE
SALVATION
ARMY 0
CHURCH 1.1 VILLAGE ON WOODLYN
2043
LYDIA A VE E
211
21
U�4
3all
0312109 Ll 1512121 Ll 271 f
AREA MAP
16
Attachment 3
arte interchange
�
loal - Bear Lake
°
Coun( iLid �:/ � - i ■ f ! !� ice.:.:. . ! !!� / ! . ! i � • • t
t ° - � is �R
IN
■ t ►�. ■
. • - 3
Lydia pop— _mpumm
177 1
PARIK
loom Sam
�.� -� ■ i
• v� � ss � �
!�
•
° .�_ T a •� • _ . _ Df
ssiver
�� • ,
Tai fi" •
North St Paul
cc
4 w _
:.
MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
NOWN
N
Figure 14
Attachment 4
• M
.fi
m 1
7' ,4 9a.3J', 1 - 19.9 - -
9Ao t� 8 33 ' - r 263.63' t
J
1.48ac.. 02
/.15 ac. o
4-7 �-
ot. o
1
% 1.2 � arc ��� �
2� 0 2 0 ���,� �,� � 0
Z
BC
� 4119 Ole,
PROPOSED
( 17) ' a
%9
MENDOTA HOMES o
� X34 � •
----- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- TWIN HOME
ko
(V
SITE
CL "Ne
1
t
G
N io -- - ---- - — - - - - -- - - - -- - -�- - -- ------ - - - - -- �-
C
M
Q
Q 1
1.
rn
3
8.5729.56'
4.190.17'
.¢
' O
4
14— ZG3.
m
0 m ,, L 07 1 3'0
(43)
- - 1Z�a5.73 --
I,
197. 1321.33 5<
z 'Y EN
��, A O I
.9tac- m��) 19) / 4 N 5 " 6 " 7 99 10- 11I zl) 1,
_9.�8 3 88.95 v2 102.' foZ� CoZ C Z - Z <.Z ` toZ N � 4,z t l
• , 20+,A% -
_
135 �O t3S 135"
G D 13s
lo
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
ffsl�ll
4
N
Lo At"? EcEa
C MAY 2 0 2003
V
4-)
4-3
A
.; u�� � .4l
zi
P
Ln
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WOODLYN PONDS
9L M&M FOR: MENDOTA HOMES INC.
Ty LK
RSA06W WALL
N.S.R. EAS MEN-
L
V .
r
1; :v.
(L
u j �! �0�h7 j
.. l l A
L
J . . . .. . .. . .. 4- . . . . .. . ..
<
Ty UNE Ln 11
SO FE4�/
WET LANE) <
Pow auw, NY 941-68
J "
max ppn w"m -
WVL- OKI Po! almip., T
ra %Vw Pori LOCATX)h Am mm
cc.s-.w:; ccp4TOUP
pOJ
Nfw capiloup
V14 4 1 N(* SPOT ELEvAn(>, 0
Z vj
o dw
EROSION AND SEDIMENT NOTES: DOOOTES WC*f WONUM0#7 F"-� 0-
Z 0 0
D040TEI, *ON UoW&
SIAMLL.M.1 W-LO, -4 )Arr, t f
J
Fvtk alia4c cowu7m C L,%C- WAMMW C LU 4 (
_j 0.-
WALL M7 rDla WWV -.') AM- ()T 0 IL C
A TCI-18 A SIN
►f 17* A.4 • ui
-ALI RM MINAW01a A' WC pop C (I
C4
*t4ow- *xy rv wpL Owr:
W LCK 00 C n" 1r, 7 ' w Wjo. Cc 10.0 TE:; pr ix
ACKM IK)t ►j%VW .7 gn KUf D('•3"E S LX44- PW
=WMACM SKK! W&?W AL rWM T DO--) T s mrp4coi 9o,
AV. 711 W31MAriat "c
.1 fTwa
Jr
Lk
-c
LF-MO
1,0.950 S
0
cq".b
A
it W/MA94 WARD
N.S.R. EAS MEN-
L
V .
r
1; :v.
(L
u j �! �0�h7 j
.. l l A
L
J . . . .. . .. . .. 4- . . . . .. . ..
<
Ty UNE Ln 11
SO FE4�/
WET LANE) <
Pow auw, NY 941-68
J "
max ppn w"m -
WVL- OKI Po! almip., T
ra %Vw Pori LOCATX)h Am mm
cc.s-.w:; ccp4TOUP
pOJ
Nfw capiloup
V14 4 1 N(* SPOT ELEvAn(>, 0
Z vj
o dw
EROSION AND SEDIMENT NOTES: DOOOTES WC*f WONUM0#7 F"-� 0-
Z 0 0
D040TEI, *ON UoW&
SIAMLL.M.1 W-LO, -4 )Arr, t f
J
Fvtk alia4c cowu7m C L,%C- WAMMW C LU 4 (
_j 0.-
WALL M7 rDla WWV -.') AM- ()T 0 IL C
A TCI-18 A SIN
►f 17* A.4 • ui
-ALI RM MINAW01a A' WC pop C (I
C4
*t4ow- *xy rv wpL Owr:
W LCK 00 C n" 1r, 7 ' w Wjo. Cc 10.0 TE:; pr ix
ACKM IK)t ►j%VW .7 gn KUf D('•3"E S LX44- PW
=WMACM SKK! W&?W AL rWM T DO--) T s mrp4coi 9o,
AV. 711 W31MAriat "c
.1 fTwa
VOJ
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WOODLYN PONDS
FOR: MENDOTA HOMES INC.
rd
su rD�(j
Rr. AMC SAL
"W" r lw.
x
—44
w "DO
S, c\1
Y t I-
I
f ; W I I �'• (• 1 � / J 95b5 -- ��s -s:" � _s ` 1 1 ' � Q
It
�U TLO � T
41 • L .... ..
1 Q , ! nc.,xu ilo -4w.5 �� 0
res f t 0
go
0
L N0 2
I
I - IF I
1 6 ..
j
"a" yy Lw
RECEIVED
MAY 210 2003
P'JAR EASEME-4 . ..............
---------------
95AS
e
FM W/1Wm du
ory im 0
w
le
Ir
WETLAND f 3 :A
10
1. , r, � /i� / � / ��� j � ` �. ' Sil ` LY r• yl �J' 1 t � o
-7�
4n
i
0 t
2
4v
: r
Im
if
c
0
C011CRIX
VAU ig L
C
r .[Y GUrTEP1 0 -c S
will -t 0,
F
L ; Q A
< ui
Frt.#55.0
1. 1
f
WETLAND
I -"
%
94
z
J
sr
L
z
sk rtwa —
ix
OIL
Poo ailtr I mv "t {t
EROSION AND SEDIMENT NOTES:
3r
9k rima mm
rt%a -1 or oqw?4- :" cm-JNW 7 1..
if Vm A Fm
le
W.M. am no7AM v 94%4 f
•,0- nxr ,- f I ~ 1W
!• law. ARC, V •), " it, :• W. jk*"
T"AC;ZV jt MAN kW -
, OWU -
UK?" POAC": RX-t 1r1v-r rp g! --
C)
(\j
e Amac PMJW ~w j
'y mvp v4p VWW --tsvp4ri
d
m W'611` P" arixv. xAc amw
V) z -3
Pf" 'I MOW
0 �
z
0dw
!.; nrvArk-jI.
(L 0 2
Z 0 C
). 3! T
-) <
:DJ,7"T:, IRON wcpq
-i
Q W
00.0
04(a
IT 7 A IOAA
z
W
14"AJ4
WETL AREAS
'$10-1 a A IT vvi -,
f.-Aw 10 pc
�O.W-T, mu sr
Elf"m•. "A 04
WETLAND A
g. t•�r
C)
(\j
7 0a.-
••)
C
4-)
4-)
V. PC
PRET.TUTNAPV PL OF wnr%TsTV-Kj
I-VINV3
FOR: MENDOTA HOMES INC. R E C E I V E 0
U A V 9 mn
I
S r-
4
Lm--
3'
Sri r; W
U
C -E c-
113t
29 4
so rl .4
Le.
; I -a
C- Pr
er
3: > c
L: z
So' L, -a'
L.1
4.294 so I :� ;' �� a �8 ` me
- - S c c ' 1 r' ! ;Z I o3.,°! 1 0 !�e m c
pi
b
Z. 4.294 sory r
40 C
3:
7.
O 16 z ID
&L
C, 0 4.294 So rl,
C\2
, i I T
V
go- So r-.
E
+
Jr .
Ir
Le.
C z
X-
Z.Db VL
NOL-T lba
i,
— — — — — — — — — ,----- - - - - -- — — —
c:•AU
WA
Lp.
IORGrFIM. r 1.
lb� wt apoommi-ow 0 0
—0 —1 gel. p—
Iro ow IN. J.
f3j" w?jw No ma.. UWMWW
2.- tq
r—
c\j
Kel
�! e.
C
s
Q
Gat- ZG1 -�K•o
Est-- 4 o
hL. Nth \04cco T wc�
IN rJ NT t
R E C E I V ED
MAY 2 0 2003
Mom
Aid
# 1 -OS
'3
SMTN
:�
s3
K.
I
Od-a Co Amu., , Pay tr.��.D �IR.Rt U&xxs- 3•W4 n
.r,
1 6m hoc
N
s - �3 Ny I �.,,►�ko�s
i
LTS Yid F I'7
FRONT ELEVATION
Ala 1/4r - i 1#-ON
NJ
Ul
Il�uou.'
FRONT ELEVATION
Ala 1/4' = l'-O"
C)
r—
c
a�
E
-i)
Q
h
U ul
w
z
W z
r.. h
I
O
IL
U=
O
0
z
w
U
mini w
U
C
Q
J
J
w
z
F
w
U
J
r
R E C E I V E 0
MAY 2 d 2003
cn
Z
0
U
D ?
L
> Z W
'O
�< 3:
) w-o ° <
i�wo
,Z - j o
.DaZ
'o<w
t
F
c
c
c
u
0
WOODLYN PONDS STREETSCAPE
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MENDOTA HOMES
dig
Attachment 11
NDOTA P.O. Box 416
Forest Lake, MN 55025
O oseville
INC 11�� (651) 604 -0967
Fax
(651) 604 -0972
Forest Lake
R E C E I V E D
(651) 464-9055 Fax
May J y 14, 2003 (651) 4649056
MAY 2 0 2003
City of Maplewood
Attn: Tom Ekstrand
1830 County road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Ekstrand,
Mendota Homes, Inc. is requesting a variance to fill three small wetland areas located on
the property at 2090 East County Road D in Maplewood. This request accompanies an
application to construct 26 new townhomes (13 twinhomes) on the property.
The development site has two significant characteristics which make this variance
necessary. First, the existing, sma wetland areas on the site are disp through p gh t the
property in a way that makes a cohesive housing developrnerit imp ossible' while
preserving these areas.
Second, the site is bisected by a substantial utility easement ,'making a on -
y g e and one-half
acre area of this five acre parcel unbuildable. The proposed develop plan includ
r p P p es
the
creation of a new wetland in the easement area. The new wetland rep laces the
existing wetlands at a ratio greater than the req uired 2:1. Moreover, the
q new wetland
creates an aesthetic and environmental amenity for the development and the surrounding
hb p g
neighborhood, orhood, while making use of an otherwise unusable ortion of the prope
h p p P may
Finally t new wetland area provides cohesion to the development plan, in to tie
p p � helping
together the north and south portions of the development.
This variance request meets the State law requirements for undue hard •
q dship. First, under
the present conditions, developing the site while maintaining the ex
• • _ g st ng small wetland
areas would require under - utilization of the property ands sporadic placement of dwelling
units to accommodate wetland preservation. As a transitional p p d e ling
uni iional area between a City rk
and a higher density a partme nt y p
g y p ent complex, twinhome construction is an appropriate,
reasonable use of the property. Under- utilization is an unreasonable alternativ .
a ve, in light
of the wetland replacement plan proposed. Second the sporadic lace
� p place of wetland
pockets and the existence of a utility easement are. conditions unique to
q the pro perty and
not the creation of the developer. Third, granting his variance would not of alter the
essential character of the area.. The property contains wetland areas now an '
d will contain
a wetland area a -fter development. In fact, the variance would facilitate the r •
c eation of a
larger, maintainable wetland, enhancing he neighborhood's character.
g g ter.
27
This variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. We have worked
extensively with the Ramsey County Watershed District to ensure we are appropriately
replacing the existing wetland pockets. The proposed new wetland exceeds the p e
2:1 replacement ratio and represents a maintainable alternative to the resent conditions.
ons.
We are not wholesale removing a wetland. We are creating etter conditions on the g t e site
that allow for wetland maintenance and well- planned residential construction.
Please contact Mendota Homes, Inc. at 651-604-0967 for additional information.
Sincerely,
Erin Mathern
for Mendota Homes, Inc.
i
Attachment 12
M ENDOTA
OME(S
May 14, 2003
RECEIVED
MAY 2 0 2003
City of Maplewood.
Attn: Toni Ekstrand
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood... MN 55149
Dear Mr. Ekstrand,
P.O. Box 416
Forest Lake, MN 55025
Roseville
(651) 604 -0967
Fax
(651) 604 -0972
Forest Lake
(651) 464 -9055
Fax
(651) 464 -9056
Attached, please find Mendota Homes' application for a Conditional Use Permit to
construct thirteen rambler-style units on the property twinhomes (26 dwelling � at
approximately 2090 East County Road D, legally described as Tract Registered L
-�, g and
Survey #463. This property is rectangular in shape with Count Road D
P y as its north
boundary and Woodlyn Avenue as its south bounda The roe in
�'y p roperty rty eludes 254 feet of
street frontage on both streets and is 857 feet long. The roe contains
• li g property �y a wetland area
and a pipene easement running east 1 west, effective) bisecting the r
. y g property. The
property is zoned F, farm residential. One vacant single ome is resent) located
h y presently ed
on
the site. ft is bordered by a City park area to the west and a newly constructed
apartment building to the east.
We understand that twinhomes are a permitted conditional use within the farm '
a m res�dent�al
zoning classification. We believe our proposal meets the criteria for approval of a
conditional use permit set forth by the City of Maplewood.
1. The use would-be located, design maintained constructed and operated to be
in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
The proposed use is consistent with the residential character of the underlying
zoning designation. Moreover, the style of housing proposed - twinhomes - is
. , p p
permitted as a conditional use. A residential use of the rop e �y has been
p
contemplated by the City Maplewood. The presence of - a il5 foot wide easement
a ment,
the buildable portions of the property, makes twinhomes a log ica l `
rty k - _ -.- gn al choke. The
proposed development will provide a lower density ansition between the high
gh
density apartments to the west and the park area to the west.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding
area.
INC.
29
The surrounding area is either used as, or planned for, residential uses. The
proposed development is exclusively residential and is in g
kee p in with the
surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
The proposed development will bring 26 new homes to the neighborhood
enhancing g 5P g p op erty values.
4. The use will not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment, or method
s a, f
operation that would be dangerous...
The proposed use is .strictly residential, and poses no danger to the surrounding
g
area.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would
not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets
The 26 planned units will be served by two new rivate roadways. A roadway
p y y
with access from Woodlyn Avenue will provide ingress and egress for the three
gr gx'
twinhomes located on the south end of the development. with access
p . A roadway
from County Road D will provide ingress and egress for the remaining g ten
twinhomes. County Road D and Woodlyn are significant thorou g hfares that do
not presently appear congested. The proposed development will appeal to couples
pp p
and empty - nesters likely to take fewer vehicular trips per day, minimizing
P p Y� g
the traffic impact of the development. Additionally, the new roadways inclu
Y y
In the development provide for just two new curb cuts - one on Woodlyn and one
on County Road D.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services includin
streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer stems ,
schools, and parks.
sJ'
The existing services, coupled with new services and amenities created b t he
e
development, will provide adequate public services for the ro'ect.
p J
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and
services.
We believe this statement to be true.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
The site currently contains three small wetland areas. The proposed development
plan � p p op ent
p allows the creation of a much larger wetland area, centrally located between
30
the north and south portions of the development, for the enjoyment of all
residents. The creation of this new, sustainable wetland allows for better, more
efficient use of the property by replacing marginal wetland areas sporadicall
p y
located on the site. The wetland will be the dominant natural feature on h
t e site
and will provide an appropriate transition between the ro osed development p p p t and
the new park area to the west.
9. The use will cause minimal adverse environmental impacts.
The proposed development will allow for sustainable reservation of a significant
. p g cant
wetland area, and will result in no foreseeable adverse environmental conditions.
We feel that the proposed twinhome development represents an appropriate,
thoughtful use of the property.
Please contact me for any additional information. 651- 604 - 0967.
Sincerely,
r
Erin 1Vlathern
for Mendota Homes, Inc.
31
Attachment 13
Ramsey - Washington Metro
1902 East County Road B
District Maplewood, MN 55109
(651)704-2089
fax: (651 )704 -2092
email: off ice@rwmwd.org
April 21, 2003
E 0
John Mathern
Mendota Homes, Inc. MAY 202003
PO Box 416
Forest Lake, MN 55025
RE: Woodlyn Ponds
Dear Mr. Mathern,
After review of the replacement plan submitted for the above- '
mentioned project, there are
additional components of the plan that are required. - Please se '
q e the attached copies the
Wetland Conservation Act with the needed items highlighted. Bec '
Because o f the review time
associated with replacement plan reviews, this ro'ect will not o
p .l g to the Board in May but will
go to the Board the following month. A notice of a pp lication has been sent out to the necessary
agencies.
A full staff review was held today and there were a couple o
p f comments about the plan that
should be addressed. Our engineer sua ests that you either •
ag y r venfy there is no Increase in the
flood level In the wetland to the southwest OR show that
the 100 -year flood elevation of the
wetland is at least 2 feet below any nearby low floors. Also , the plans were unclear as to where
.
the inlets and outlets to the stormwater ponds were located located..,. ,. Please send a plan where that is
clearer. Also, on the revised set of Tans, a rock constructs
be shown.
p on entrance and Inlet protection steal]
Overall, I feel this is a good plan with an exciting opportunit g pp y to create a wonderful amenity for
the development. I hope that a good vegetation and monitoring oring plan 1s developed to ensure this
created wetland is a success.
If you have any uestions feel free t _ _
q o call me at 651 704 2089. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Tina Carstens
Permit Program Coordinator
32
May 27, 2003
3 �.'Fjs'1:«�.,�Zw"5 ,"'�� � �'�"��� ti"'�-- ,- ..'�•/' „ t ` �)�F �"�r`�' y "' i
F f Y t
r R.ni,
Together We Can
Attachment 14
Douglas D. & Sherri L. Sporre
2099 Lydia Ave. E.
Maplewood, M.N 55109 -1458
NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY - MENDOTA HOMES TOWN HOUSE PROPOSAL (FORMERLY
THE HAUSE PROPERTY AT 2090 COUNTY ROAD D)
RECM
01 Oil 3
This letter is to get your opinion on an application the city received for property in yo r
Pp
neighborhood. Mendota Homes, Inc., is requesting that the Maplewood City Council approve
their proposed 26 -unit town house development. The applicant is proposing to deve _ 'd L - " � s
property with 13 twin homes. Three twin homes would front on Woodlyn Avenue; the other ten
would be accessed from a private street that would.. intersect County Road D. Refer to the
attachments.
I need your Opinion to help me prepare a recommendation to the planning commission and city
council. Please write your opinion and comments below and return this letter, and any
attachments on which you have written comments, in the enclosed postage -paid envelope by
June 6, 2003.
If you would like further information, please call me at 651 - 770 -4562 between 8 a.m. and
4:30 p.m. I will send you a notice of any public hearing on this application. Thank you for your
comments. I will give them careful consideration.
THOMAS EKSTRAND - ASSISTANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Enclosures:
Maps and Drawings r
have no comments:
Comments:
t,
ci-A +_ c - Ar nu r C�c
(Mendota d�ota Hom (�U� n Ci-�Q
( es /Section 2N) �
)o-
A D. I -- rArf - ��n� dog. CL u. ��' 0 (-:�n
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPM 651- 770 - 4560 Fax: 651-748-3096
CITY OF MAPL EWOOD 1 830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
33
Attachment 15
Maplewood Engineering Plan Review
Date: 06/6/03
By: Erin Schacht and Chris C avett
Project: Woodlyn Ponds
Review Summary:
The applicant shall address the following comments to the preliminary plans.
Grading and Erosion Control:
1. A large number of contours are missing from the grading plan between the
buildings in block 2.
2. Grading permits from the city, Watershed, and MPCA (new NPDES Construction
Permit) are required.
3. The applicant shall submit a specific seeding plan of exactly what seed mixtures
are to be used in different areas.
Steep slopes, as well as the areas in and around the ponding areas shall be seeded
with a appropriate native (wet and dry) grass and forbes mixtures. In fact much of
the area between blocks 1, 2 & 3 shall be vegetated with native vegetation. It is
strongly recommended that the applicant utilize an experienced installer firm who
specializes in the establishment of native plant communities. Seed mix designs
p
should be compatible to the native restoration work taking place in the open space
property to the east.
Seeding and mulching of the site with a temporary cover crop (rye, oats or winter
wheat) shall be done in phases to secure the-site and shall be completed in
accordance to the new NPDES Construction Permit.
4. The emergency overflow to the wetland, and the ditch on the west side of east
side of the site needs to have soil stabilization blanket. Include riprap at all inlets
and outlets.
5. All slopes 3:1 or greater need erosion control matting and blanket to protect the
seeded area from erosion.
6. Revise the grading plan to show existing trees, as well as elevation of the top and
bottom of the walls.
7. The city requires a building permit for any retaining walls 4 -feet tall or higher.
The applicant shall include all retaining walls on the project plans. The developer
or applicant shall include a detail of the wall design with the building permit
34
application. More detail (including cross - sections) is required for the walls at the
east side of the site.
8. A temporary grading easement will be required for any activity on the adjacent
properties. This includes the grading for the overflow swale at the south west.
9. The City of Maplewood has been undergoing a native vegetation restoration
project in the open space to the east and it is critical this area is not disturbed. Silt
fence installation and work required to construct the retaining wall shall not
extend east of the east property line, (city open space).
Street:
1. The street shall be a private association driveway. The street shown on the plan is
24 -feet -wide, which allows for noon street parking. If on- street parking is
desired, a minimum 28 -wide street is required to allow parking on one side.
Drainage /Storm Sewer:
Summary: The proposed storm water management plan is generally very good. The
large pond area being created in the middle of the site will be nearly 3 times the size of
the wetlands being lost. In addition, a treatment pond and grassy swales will treat storm
water before it enters this large basin.
1. Though properly engineered and constructed overland flow is advantageous to
water quality, we strongly question this application directing concentrated flows
from impervious surfaces onto vegetated slopes. Either providespecific details of
how short -term and long -term erosion and runoff will be managed with such an
application, or provide catch basins and storm sewer on both streets that flow to
the ponding areas.
On the south side of the plat, one option is to consider spillways between parcels
2 &3 and 4 &5, as well as utilizing permanent soil stabilization blanket on the
slopes.
On all sloped swales where concentrated flows will be expected and where soils
are susceptible to erosion, permanent soil stabilization blanket, (Enkamt, NAG
C350, others) shall be utilized.
2. No drainage map accompanied the runoff calculations. The applicant shall submit
a drainage map of the site with pre - development and post - development runoff
calculations.
35
3. Indicate NWL and HWL elevations on the grading and utility plan for all basin
areas.
4. Direct FES 1 to the south.
Utilities:
1. No sanitary service shall be connected directly to a sanitary manhole. The service
shown at sanitary manhole #5, shall be connected to the sewer main with a wye
just upstrearn of the MH.
2. The development, north of the power line easement, will be served by the St. Paul
Regional Water Services, (SPRWS). The area south of the power line easement
will be served by North St. Paul Water Utility.
The applicant must coordinate plan review and approval by each of the
appropriate agencies. Specific agreements and easements may be required
between the homeowner's association and each agency.
For SPRWS, contact Bill Tschida @ 651- 266 -6265
For NSPWU, contact Mark Bartholomew @ 651- 770 -4488
Other:
1. Provide a deeded 10 -foot pedestrian easement on the north side of the property.
Reconstruct the entire bituminous trail along the County Road D frontage and
locate a minimum of 5 -feet behind the curb. Taper into the existing alignment at
the east side of the property.
2. Provide. .10 -foot drainage and utility easements on all sides of the property.
3. Install a 6 -wide concrete sidewalk on along the entire Woodlyn frontage, placed
7 -feet behind the curb. Provide curb ramps at the drive entrance.
36
Attachment 16
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mendota Homes, Inc. has applied for a variance from the wetland buffer
requirements of the zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to the property at 2090 County Road D East. The legal
description is
TRACT A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 463, RAMSEY COUNTY
WHEREAS, Section 36- 196 (h)(3) of the wetland protection ordinance requires a 25- foot -wide
wetland buffer around the three existing Class 4 wetlands on this property.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to remove these wetlands and mitigate them with a
better quality, larger wetland.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On June 16, 2663, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve
this variance.
2. The city council held a public hearing on July 22, 2063. City staff published a notice in
the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required
by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present
written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the
city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
variance for the following reasons:
1. The variance will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the applicant
will replace three small, poorer - quality wetlands with a larger, better - quality wetland.
2. Strict enforcement of the code, by requiring the preservation of the existing wetlands, would
not result in the best use and layout of the property and would, therefore, cause undue
hardship. The three subject wetlands are not of a nature that they would be an asset to the
site for either water retention or wildlife habitat. In this instance, it is an advantage to the
developer, as well as the city, to create a useable and aesthetic wetland in lieu of the
existing ones.
Approval is conditioned upon the applicant doing the following:
a. Revise the site plan to provide a wetland- protection buffer around the proposed wetland.
This buffer must be an average of 25 feet wide with a minimum width of 20 feet.
b. Dedicate a wetland buffer easement to the City of Maplewood prior to obtaining a
grading permit for the project.
c. Install wetland - protection buffer signs around the buffer before the first unit is occupied
which states, "WETLAND BUFFER AREA —DO NOT MOW, CUT, DUMP, DISTURB
BEYOND THIS POINT —CITY OF MAPLEWOOD." These signs shall be installed not
more than 100 feet apart.
37
d. Provide a planting plan for the wetland buffer to be approved by the watershed district.
This plan. shall consist of a proposal to plant the buffer with native wetland vegetation.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on July 22, 2003.
m
Attachment 17
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mendota Homes, Inc. applied for a conditional use permit for a planned unit
development to construct the 26 -unit Woodlyn Ponds Twin Home development.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 438(b) of the city code provides a means to allow flexibility in design by the
planned unit development process.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2090 County Road D East. The legal description
is:
TRACT A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 463, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 16, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this
permit.
2. On July 22, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports
and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
W
8.. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped May 20, 2003. The city council may
approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor
changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The applicant shall provide a noise evaluation for this site to determine if freeway noise
would impact their proposed units above the maximum noise levels required by the .
MnPCA. If freeway noise does exceed these levels, the applicant shall reduce the outside
noise within the units.
5. The homeowners association documents shall state that the visitor parking lot shall be
kept open for visitor parking and shall not be a storage area for RVs, trailers, campers and
the like.
6. The applicant shall post the north -south private roadway for no parking on both sides.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on July 22, 2003.
40
Agenda #
REPORT SUMMARY
Applicant: Craig Rafferty of g rty Rafferty, Rafferty, Tollefson
Architects, representing the St. Pau! Area
Association of Realtors
Site Address: 1955 McMen
emy St. and 325 Roselawn Ave.
Current Zoning:
Proposed_ Zoning:
Land Use:
City Council Hearing Date:
60 -Day Deadline:
Single - Dwelling Residential (R -1)
Limited Business Commercial (LBC)
Limited Business Commercial (LBC)
July 14, 2003
August 19, 2003
Project Description: The St. Paul Area Association of Realtors is proposing to
purchase the property at 1955 McMenemy Street for a future expansion to their
office building located at 325 Roselawn Avenue (directly to the south of the
property).
Request: The St. Paul Area Association of Re .
Rea ltors �s requesting that the ci
rezone 1955 Mc -
Menemy Street from single-dwelling residential (R-1) ' g to l imited
business commercial (LBC). State law requires rezoning f properties f
• g p p s rom
residential to
commercial to be passed by a two- third's city ouncil vote 4
Y � votes),
Recommendations: Staff recommends the cit l approve the St. Paul
Area Association counci ssociation of Realtors' re uest. - On June -
q 16, 2003, the planning
commission also recommended approval of the St. Paul Area '
� Association of
Realtors' request to rezone 1955 McMenem Street '
y from single - dwelling
residential (R -1) to limited business commercial (LBC) '
( C) by a unanimous vote.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Richard Fursman, City Manager
Shann Finwall, Associate Planner
Rezoning
Craig Rafferty of Rafferty, Rafferty, Tollefson Architects, representin g the
St. Paul Area Association of Realtors
1955 McMenemy Street
July 7, 2003
The St. Paul Area Association of Realtors (SPAAR) has purchased the property at 1955
McMenemy Street for a future expansion to their office building, which is located directly to the
south at 325 Roselawn Avenue. In order to expand their commercial office building, the property
must be rezoned from single - dwelling residential (R -1) to limited business commercial (LBC).
Request
To proceed with this proposal, SPAAR is requesting that the city rezone 1955. McMenemy Street
from single - dwelling residential (R -1) to limited business commercial (LBC). State law requires
rezoning of properties from residential to commercial to be passed by a two-third's city council
vote (4 votes).
DISCUSSION
Existing Conditions
SPAAR's office building is located on Roselawn Avenue, with additional frontage on Sloan Place
and McMenemy Street. To the. north of the office building are four single- family properties with
double frontage lots on Sloan Place and McMenemy Street. To the north of the single - family
houses is Maplewood Fire Station No. 3.
Zoning and Comprehensive Plan
The applicant's office building at 325 Roselawn Avenue is zoned and guided as LBC. The four
single - family properties located to the north of the applicant's office building, including 1955
McMenemy Street, are zoned as R -1 but guided in the city's comprehensive plan as LBC. LBC
zoning is a low- impact commercial zoning district, designed for transition areas between
residential and commercial. Permitted uses include offices, medical or health related clinics and
day care centers.
In 1990 the city studied properties that had inconsistent zoning and land use designations. The
four single - family properties located to the north of SPAAR's office building were included in this
study. At that time, the properties were zoned Farm Residence and guided in the city's
comprehensive plan as limited service commercial (this zoning classification was later changed to
limited business commercial (LBC)). After the study, the city council rezoned the four properties
from Farm Residence to R -1, but retained the limited service commercial land use designation.
The city council determined th
of the Properties' the commercial land use designation .
p perties' proximity to existin co s�gnation should be retained
because of their g mmercial properties to the because
proximity to freeway access. In • • west, across Sloan Place an
zoning district would have addition, the low -irn act us d
minimal impacts on residents p es allowed in the LBC
McMenemy Street. al properties located t
o the east, across
Future Expansion
If the city approves the rezo ning
,the applicants will comp lete
detailed plan oning of 1955 McMenerny Street
p ns for the removal of the single-family et e more
including grading ngle- fail house and the e p
• g g and drainage, landsca in ex pansion of their parkin I
will require review b the � .p g and lighting plans. The ex 9 of
affect Y e city s community design reuse expansion of the parking lot
affected property owners. Lon - g w board with notification
building, which g range plans include an exp cation a all
g h will also require review b p ion to the applicant's off;
y the CDRB. offi
The applican st ate that rezoning the pro
defined in the city 's land p p Y from R -� to ABC would co
use designation ma In addition, mply with the intent
parking on the p the expansion of '
al overflow parki s their office building
will help eliminate occasion
- their office building, m inimizing st reet and will create two •
zing traffic conflicts at Roselawn o access points for
Avenue.
Neighbor Concern
The property owners most
affected by the applicant's
Street directly to the north of 19 proposal are located at 1961
Citizen Co 55 McMenemy Street. The; McMenemy
Com ments section of the staff re p ort r concerns are addressed in the
p °n page 4 • In summary, these
the future expansion have
of the � property owners
expressed concerns over
fighting, fencing and the impacts arking lot and office b •
pacts of a parking lot next to home.
, a
wilding including
their residential
Keith Holmes representti
installed ve for SPAAR , has indicated that the existing security
fast year after their office lights
will
installed
remov buildi was vandalized. Y ghts were
ved entirely or replaced with Mr. Holmes states that the '
Property. Mr. Hol has also stated that SP th bights that will not produce se l ights
p e glare into the neighbor's
concern. over the Proposed AAR will address the residential
p p sed fence by installing more ential property owners'
Screening between residential g e natural screen of be '
tiaf and commercial properti ert; mrng and landscaping
commercial property to the ad' Y Y e to ensure no
screening will be reviewed b the Jacent residential property.
Y e CDRB once the applicant p p Y• This
application. p has submitted a formal design review
Other Comments
Building Official: When the ' cant completes the
spaces will appli parking lot at least three accessi e parking
be required, per the 65 a
parkin spaces p spaces proposed w bl
g p s as van accessible. Whe wi th at least one of the acce ssible
acce
they will be required n the applicant completes th
q to sprinkler the building nd a a ddition to their buildin g
g add an elevator,
Assistant City Eng ineer: The applicant should note
amb itious g «
for the site. A full that the conceptual" site
application. grading and drainage plan �,• plan seems rather
pp on. There will be site issue ill be required prior to builds
addressed at that ' es with regard to grading, building permit
time. g age and ponding that mus be
St. Paul Area Association of Realtors 2
July 7, 2003
Summary
Rezoning 1955 McMenemy Street is consistent ' '
with the spirit, purpose and intent of the city
long -range land use plan for the area. In addition
on, the zoning change and future exp ansion will
:not detract from the use of the neighboring
Prop because p
in which w' p • ause of the proposed berming and
landscaping 9 ill ensure screening, the additional arkin which •
parking p 9 h will help alleviate
occasional on- street
p g and the second parking lot access which will hel '
occasional traffic congestion. p alleviate
COMMISSION ACTION
On June 16, 2003, the planning commission unanimously recommended approval of the St. Paul
Area Association of Realtors' request to rezone 1955 McMenemy Street from single - dwelling
residential (R -1) to limited business commercial (LBC).
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the zoning map change resolution on a
1955 McMen p ge 14. This re- solution changes the zoning a fo
nemy Street from single - dwelling residential (R-1) t0 ' g p r
(LBC ). The cit i limited business commercial
y s making this change because:
g
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not subs '
9 substantially inure or detract from the use of neighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood,
ghborhood and that the use of the ro ert
adjacent to the area c p p y
included in the
proposed hange or plan is adequately safeguarded.
uarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the be interests and conveniences of the communit
where applicable, and the public welfare. y:
4• The proposed change wou ld •
g uld have no negative effect upon the log effi g � cent, and
economical extension of public services
and facilities, such as public water, sewers olice
and fire protection and schools. } p
St. Paul Area Association of Realtors 3
July 7, 2003
CITIZEN COMMENTS
I surveyed the owners of the 33 properties within 500 feet of 1955 McMenemy treet. Of the e nine
responses received, four were in favor of the proposal, two had concerns, and three were
opposed.
In Favor
1. Larry Black of MNCON, Inc., 1959 Sloan Place North: "With the fire department
north p t to the
I
think the proposed zoning is a better fit than the existing!"
2. Church of St. Jerome' s, 380 Roselawn Avenue East: "We have no .
objection "
objections.
3. John and Marilyn Thomas, 328 Roselawn Avenue East: "The rezoning request
tans are g q t and future
p e acceptable to us. We have no problems with them.
4. David and Leilani Drake, 313 Bellwood Avenue East: "No comments at resent
p , in
information available as to potential positive and /or adverse implications. Will t to come
p try e
to public meeting if the date works out with scheduled and /or prioritized ans. Thank you
for the notice."
p
Concerns
1. Bud & Beth Walsh, 314 Roselawn Avenue East: "In response to the letter we received
eived
about the Realtor's rezoning request. We would like to see an additional entrance to the
new parking lot on the east side, from McMenemy. This would he! relieve
ff Y p some of the
traffic on the corner of Sloan Place. We live directly across the street from that
intersection. I have spoken with our neighbors many times about the amount of traffic at
that - intersection, and the speed that people drive on Roselawn. We have an extreme)
in and out of our driveway, Y
hard time getting eway, the traffic is too inconsiderate to let us in and
out. There have been numerous accidents because of these conditions. When the
realtors have meetings and they all leave at once you can sit in our driveway or 10 min.
before someone will let you Y
y out. I'm not kidding, it happens a lot! Thank you for letting us
put in our input."
2. William and Jolynn Giles: "It would be nice to see the and on the corner
p cleaned up.
Also, after expanding, the traffic on McMenemy could be rerouted to Sloan and a cul -de-
sac made. This would slow traffic."
Opposed
1. Mark and Janet Johnson, 1961 McMenemy Street North: 1 We are con
building security lights shining too brightly on and .) concerned about the
Realtors bui in our house and ard•
important w Y , 2) Most
im
p e don't want a fence blocking our view of McMenemy Street. The wood fence
would be acceptable if it starts where the existing house is; 3 We are concerned d that a
parking lot would look ugly from McMenemy Street and not fit in with the current
residential look. Instead of a lawn our view will be of cars and concrete from our front
windows and yard."
2. Lorraine Littlefield, 1986 McMenemy Street North: "I am against this.'
'
9 s. There is enough
congestion and cars on this street and lights shining in my bedroom window. Lets just
have private homes."
3. Hubert and Herbert Toenjes, 1950 Hawthorne Avenue East: "We are
pursuing developing
R1 on the east side of McMenemy. Light business commercial across street would not be
desirable. Our vote would be — no. However, if the city council would consider rezoning
east side of McMenemy LBC then our comment would be — yes.);
St. Paul Area Association of Realtors 4 July 20
y 03
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site Size: 25,646 square feet
Existing Land Use: Single- Family House
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North:
Single- Family House (Zoned R -1)
South:
St. Paul Area Association of Realtors' Office Building (Zoned LBC)
East:
Single - Family houses across McMenemy Street (Zoned R -1)
West:
Maplewood Office Center (Zoned LBC and Commercial Office)
PLANNING
Existing Zoning: Single- Dwelling Residential
Existing Land User Limited Business Commercial
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Rezoning: Section 36 -485 of the zoning ode requires g q es that the city council make the following
findings to rezone property:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, p t, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the ro ert
p p Y
adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community,
where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the efficient, g p e logrcai, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers police
and fire protection and schools. ' p
P: comdev \sec17\stpaulrealtorsretoning
Attachments:
1. City Location Map
2. Location Map
3. Land Use Map
4. Zoning Map
5. Existing Site Plan
6. 1955 McMenemy Street
7. Schematic Site Plan
8. Long Range Plan
9. Zoning Map Change Resolution
St. Paul Area Association of Realtors 5 July 7 2003
Attachment 1
W
�`,
Cu
U
Cu
-1
L
0
0
0
0
r
5
Attachment 2
y ,.
M ME
1 ME
NO
ME
M ME
No
ME
M ME
N
s Location
Map
7
W Lr)
CY)
Light Manufacturin
Heavy Manufacturing
Neighborhood Commercial
Commercial Office
Limited Business Commercial
® Business Commercial Modified
S Business Commercial
Small Lot Single Dwelling Resi
Single Dwelling Residential
Double Dwelling Residential
1 Low Multiple Dwelling Resident
Medium Multiple Dwelling Resid
High Multiple Dwelling Residen
30000 Residential Estate
40000 Residential Estate
Park
Open Space
School
City
Government
^C'is Library
Cemetery
Church
Fire Station
Lard Use
�101
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Roselawn Avenue
Light Manufacturin
® Heavy Manufacturing
Neighborhood Commercial
Commercial Office
zk1- Limited Business Commercial
Business Commercial Modified
® Business Commercial
Shopping Center
[� Small Lot Single Dwelling Residential
0 Single Dwelling Residential
Double Dwelling Residential
4 fy Low Mulitpie Dwellings
t:
High Multiple Dwelling Residential Condo
Planned Urban Development
Residential Estate (30,00 sq ft)
Residential Estate (40,00) sq ft)
0
Farm
Zoning
W E
S
9
1~
z
OCOTMG PROFERTY ZCNED - SWGLE CUP I M FMW> AL l6DW
1
!!
39,74 1
Cp
M
CA
GARAGE
i
i• C I I� I)
f 1 `ti�rETi.It� I I it
2 ASPHALT tlR;'fr it
C1 ,�
X4.2
~ I �
II
75.4
OCD FEN+ _
it
EXIFNG
i
I
i .i
�I m
� n I
b• c
i X I
AT
D
M
N m
A 9 I
i m
r! /
1
i
1'
• i
I
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT RIGHT of WAY �
I
I i i
i
ROSELAWN AVENUE
Attachment 5
0=
3
Z
M
m .
- 4
M
M
-+
Existing Site Plan
10
Attachment 6
1955 McMenem I y Street
11
NORTH LINE OF THE S.E. JS.E. L N.E. SEC.19
1
I
f
I�
---
---- - - - - -- EAST 223.0 FEET
Im
f N
Im
f Z
A
i
a
o
y �
I
f of
i
66
CHAI
I p
1
`
S89'59 i 30 °r W, 223.00
190 .00
---
__.
3.00
39.74
i
I
33
f
(j,
1
� _
'^
I IJH
1
° o
G
C)
l
f
OD
p
W
I Z
z ;
Z
p
m
.�
m
1 I
D
m
(
2&8
GI
I
f
$
m
I
M
i �
E
E
aARAM a
ASPHALT MW
I
PP
TB 0
t>$GV
P I
I
J
NGV
I
33
190.06
=m
7S4
4
33 .00
f
S89'48'38 "E 223.06
a
ss
G RAPHIC SCALE
b 14 03
I
v
i tnoh - EO it
5
o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND
O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET
C ®"rO (A�
INC.
® DENOTES MANHOLE
A 0
R LAND SURVEYORS
;
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
mi DENOTES POWER POLE
TS DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX
(651) 48 --3301
L
i
that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
D LOCATION OF UTIUTIES SHOkW ARE APPRO) MATE ONLY.
Y SURVMRS 70 WEST COUNTY D C"
OTHER UTILITIES MAY 0= SHFIIGI HAVE NOT eEEN sHOWN.
CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454454-4= -0
?ORGERSEN� INC. u'LE CANADA, MN. 55117
David E. Targersen, P.L.S.
Mlnn. Reg. Na. '7551
FOR EXACT LOCATIONS BEFORE BEGINNING CON57RUC71oN.
Dote
I R&A91on Dat ;oa No. ,I Ob No, n3 - .017 Flle No.
. S64 pK
1955 McMenem I y Street
11
-- EMTlMj PRCPERiY ICNM - SMILE DM1LM RE61D✓ MAL MR) —
Attachment - 7
T-
T
J
C)
j -- - - - - -- i i!
rn
- - �- - --
m � J tl C n �1
N ;I ii N Ph
rn
�� I - � - _� r •1L n I
c7 I i� �- '-------- - -,� -- � 1 � �
m
m
ilu
—4
it
�! I° Exsrw PA.W.Kr I .
I � I
li
g
�j I ► I
I
M
`��. I � '� - -- • � it
z I
1 w it ' D C i
II 9 l
li i i
it � •.` i
i it it
I I
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT RIGHT of WAY
i
i
I j I
N � ,
ROSEL WN AVENUE
Schema.,..pl,.tic si.te P1 n
W E •
S
12
�` , ext Brnr, PPZFERrr zap . SWLa rtt81LW F MSCqM& l saw 1
3 .
:I <
z
m
Attachment 8
I
II
I
:i
1'
i�
I;
(I I
1+
1
I
II
II
,
II
Ij
1
I;
!
it
I,
�
is
i�
c
I(
i;
it
i
1
((
1'
11
Ii
t�
Ij
i,
(
I I
I�
Ij
I I I ;
.I
I
I�
i�
r
i
!
i
I
i
i
!
(
N N i
Q
I.Ll
41-
fn '
i
.r
'J Q1
Fri
T5 C
I O
Ii i r � '' i �_ �I i (•
_ II ! n i• II �! I
i � • - L' r`1
m S TBA!G<
SST ACK
a U3
r
TTI
Rut
I
I: 1
mom vvv n
r � - 'a viti�j
j¢ ----,� ^ m O A
I fgf
-b-
9 2
Ota
L: i i Ir
� I I
r
I
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT FIGHT of WAY
, I
i
•i I
ROSEL UN AVENUE
Long Range Plan
Q r
iJ
M
z
M
M
M
-4
!
i
I,
I
) I
O i•
m
c ,
13
Attachment 9
ZONING MAP CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the St. Paul Area Association of Realtors has requested a change
ma from sin le- q nge to the
city's zoning p g dwelling residential (R -1) to limited business commercial (LBC .
WHEREAS, this change applies to 1955 McMenern Streefi Maplewood, plewood, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is:
East 223 feet of the N405 feet of the SE quarter of the SE uarter of the
Sec. 18 TVV q NE quarter of
N 29, Range 22, except N 270 feet thereof, according o the United Stat
ther g es
Government Survey o ,Ramsey County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On June 16, 2003, the tannin commission p g on recommended that the city council approve
the rezoning change.
2. On July 14, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. City staff
g Y published a notice in
the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. Th
g p p Y e
council conducted
the public hearing whereby all public present were iven a chance to
speak and resent written sta g
p statements. The city council also considered reports and
recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city ouncil approve the -
a in Y pp a above
described change the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose an
p , p p d intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantial) injure or detract from
Y ! the use of neighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the ro
adjacent to the area inc! p pe�Y
ad
J included in - the proposed change or plan is adequate! safeguarded.
Y g
3: The proposed chan a will serve the best t interests an.d conveniences of the community,
where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the 9 p logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as ublic water, s
protection p ewers,
police and fire
p and schools.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on
2003.
14
Agenda #
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Assistant Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Legacy Village
LOCATION: South of County Road D between Hazelwood Street and Southlawn Drive
DATE: July 8, 2003
INTRODUCTION
Legacy Village is a mixed -use development consisting of rental townhomes and a senior
assisted living apartment building in the first phase to be constructed by Hartford. Future
development by others includes commercial uses of various kinds on the east side of the
site fronting Southlawn Drive, a multi - family site of 50 units in the northeast
corner of the
site, a corporate office site in the middle of the property, and for -sale townhomes in the
southwest quadrant of the site. Two public park areas, linked by sidewalks, trails and
several ponding areas, will provide active and passive recreation for the project.
The project is served by County Road D on the north which is to be upgraded and
extended to Highway 61 west of the property. On the east is existing Southlawn Drive.
Kennard Street will be extended north through the middle of the site to County Road D in
a parkway design, and a new east -west street, Legacy Parkway, will connect Southlawn
and Kennard in the middle of the site.
REQUESTS
• Comprehensive plan amendments from BC (business commercial ) to R -3H (high
density residential) and P (park)
• Conditional use permit ,CUP) for PUD
• Preliminary plat
Approval of tax - abatement financing
SUMMARY
Legacy Village calls itself a "village" and is being planned as a "unit" under the city's
zoning scheme, but it will be developed in several stages by different people at different
times -- various parcels being sold off to other developers, builders and businesses to
create the final entity some years down the road. The key will be to knit these pieces
together with appropriate p ate details, design guidelines, and development standards so that
the finished piece can truly become a legacy that Maplewood will be p roud of and a
village contributing to the character. of the area.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and our planning consultant, Mr. Phil Carlson of DSU, feel this ro osal will be an
p p
asset to Maplewood and recommend that the city council approve these requests as
noted in the attached staff report.
p: sec3\LegacyVillage. Summary
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP, Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc., Plannin g Consultant
SUBJECT: Legacy Village at Maplewood — Hartford Group, Inc. (Mixed Use PUD)
LOCATION: Hijacek property, south of County Road D between Hazelwood and Southlawn
DATE: July S, 2603
INTRODUCTION
The Legacy Village of Maplewood project has been discussed, reviewed, and analyzed in several
forums and in several versions over the past year. City staff and consultants have met with the
developer numerous times to review and revise the project. It is now being presented for official
review by the City as a mixed use Planned Unit Development. The basic mix of uses
complements the setting in Maplewood's premier commercial area; the residential density is
appropriate for this intensely developed area and is within the City's Comprehensive Plan
guidelines; and the overall network of streets, trails, and open space makes sense for this large
undeveloped parcel of land at the City's northern edge.
Legacy Village calls itself a "village" and is being planned as a "unit" under the city's zoning
scheme, but it will be developed in several stages by different people at different times- various
parcels being sold off to other developers, builders and businesses to create the final entity some
years down the road. The key will be to knit these pieces together with appropriate details, design
guidelines, and development standards, so that the finished piece can truly become a legacy that
Maplewood will be proud of and a village contributing to the character of the area.
Project Description
Legacy Village is a mixed use development consisting of rental townhomes and a senior assisted
living apartment building in the first phase to be constructed by Hartford. Future development by
others includes commercial uses of various kinds on the east side of the site fronting Southlawn
Drive, a multi - family site of 50 units in the northeast comer of the site, a corporate office site 'in the
middle of the property, and for -sale townhomes in the southwest quadrant of the site. Two p ublic
park areas,. linked by sidewalks, trails and several ponding areas, will provide active and passive
recreation for the project. Refer to the applicant's narrative on pages 27 -37.
The_ project is served by County Road D on the north, which is to be upgraded and extended to
Highway 61 west of the property. On the east is existing Southlawn Drive. Kennard Street will be
extended north through the middle of the site to County Road D in a parkway design, and a new
east -west street, Legacy Parkway, will connect Southlawn and Kennard in the middle of the site.
Legacy Village PUD June 30,'2003
REQUESTS
• Comprehensive plan amendments from BC (business commercial) to R -3H (high
residential) and P (park)
Conditional use permit LCUP) for PUD
• Preliminar�p t
• Approval of tax - abatement financing
BACKGROUND
May 12, 2003: The city council adopted a resolution approving the AUAR (Alternative Urban Area
Wide Review), the environmental analysis, for the Legacy Village site.
June 2, 2003: The planning commission held a public hearing for the proposed Legacy Village
land use plan revisions. The planning commission opened the hearing and took testimony from
the audience. The applicant had requested postponement of this review since they were in the
process of revising the plans according to direction from the city council. The planning
commission tabled action on this proposal until July 7, 2003.
June 9, 2003: The city council vacated Alice Street as requested by a neighbor to the Legacy
Village site. This neighbor, Mr. George Supan, had requested the vacation of the Alice Street
right -of -way since it abutted his'property.
DISCUSSION
The existing property is a partially wooded, rolling site with wetlands in the northwest and
southeast corners of the site. There is an existing farmstead with several buildings in the middle
of the eastern third of the site. There is a power line, gas pipeline and telephone lines within
easements running-through the middle of the site totaling about 230 feet in width.
To the east and south of the site are commercial uses and the Maplewood Mall shopping center.
Also to the south is the St. John's hospital campus. (North of the site across County Road D are
existing multi - family and commercial uses. To the west are existing single- family homes and a
senior housing complex on Hazelwood Drive.
The current Comprehensive Plan guides the entire property as BC Business Commercial. The
proposed PUD contains significant areas of high density residential and park uses, and it would be
appropriate to have the Land Use Plan reflect these three major uses within Legacy Village:
Business Commercial, High Density Residential, and Park.
Hartford is applying for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD).
Under this approach, the property is looked at as a whole, not as individual lots and creativity,
flexibility, and a coordinated plan are encouraged. It is also appropriate within a PUD to consider
the overall density and not the density of individual parcels. Just as the density of a residential
project on an individual parcel includes the parking lot, play area, and ponding area on site, it is
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 2
reasonable and appropriate to calculate the density of a PUD including all park areas, ponding
area, and all of the various residential units together. The site is being planned as a "un.it ".
Overall, taking just the residential parcels and the number of units planned (50 units on the multi-
family site, 250 units on the for -sale townhome site) the net density would be 14.1 units /acre. But
taking into account all the park and ponding area., which can be credited for density purposes to
the residential uses the gross density is 10.8 units /acres, well within the 12 units /acre guided in
the Comprehensive Plan for High Density Residential and R -3 zoning. A summary of other town
house projects around the region, with some of their features and densities is attached (separate
attachment).
Another feature of a PUD is the ability for the city to grant flexibility to the strict zoning standards,
such as setbacks and height limits, in furtherance of an overall plan for the project. For Legacy
Village the intent is to create an intense, well- connected pedestrian "village" rather than a spread -
out suburban subdivision. Ivey to creating this character is allowing buildings to be close to the
street, so many of the buildings in Legacy Village, both commercial and residential are closer to
the street right -of -way that would otherwise be allowed.
In terms of "granting flexibility" or variances from ordinance requirements, the proposed PUD
wuld include the following deviations from Maplewood's usual standards for development:
• Building setback reductions from street right -of -ways ranging from a 5 -foot setback from
the County Road D right -of -way for the Executive Suites to 15 feet for the furniture store.
The code requires 30 feet.
• The proposed seniors building would have fewer parking spaces than the code requires.
This amount is unknown at this time since the exact amount must yet be justified as
recommended by the planning commission. The furniture store, as well, would be short
parking. The code would require 220 spaces. The applicant would provide 137 with 49
more "proof -of- parking" spaces shown.
• Parking lot setbacks would be less than required. Code requires a 15 -foot setback.
Parking lots on the north end would be down to 5 feet.
•
The building height for the seniors building would exceed code requirements. The code
requires a maximum of three stories. The applicant has proposed four stories.
To create a "pedestrian - friendly" environment there must be a network of well-planned pedestrian
P P
connections throughout the development. Much of the detailed review of this project has revolved
around making sure that these connections are provided. One of the major parts of this
connection is the power line trail through the middle of the project, which will be connected to all
the uses adjacent to it, so that everyone can use it.
An important feature so far missing from the project is a sidewalk on the south side of County
Road D. The County Road D project was being planned, designed and finalized some time before
the final plans for Legacy Village were developed, and a sidewalk on the south side is not part of
the County Road D plans at this point. Unfortunately, this was not apparent to Hartford and myself
until recently, and trying to get this sidewalk into the plans or work around it has not been possible
on such short nonce. I believe this sidewalk is essential to creating a "pedestrian- friendly'
neighborhood for the people who will live, work and shop in the northern tier of Legacy Village.
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003
There is a sidewalk planned for the north side of County Road D and the major east -west power
line trail planned, but for pedestrians — especially children — a sidewalk on the other side of County
Road D or 500 feet out of the way to the south is not practical. I would urge Hartford and the city,
to look at the details of the roadway and project design to see how this sidewalk might be
provided, and to think creatively about how to make it happen.
Each of the major pieces of the development is discussed below and recommendations follow.
Rental Townhomes
Site Plan
The rental townhomes are laid out in 5 -, 7 -, 8 -, and 9 -unit buildings on the north side of the site
abutting County Road D; 14 buildings on the west side of Kennard and 12 buildings on the east
side, for a total of, 198 units in 26 buildings. The buildings are numbered 1 -26 on the attached
map for reference.
The townhome units all have a front and back door — the front door to a sidewalk system, the back
door to the garage and driveway. The buildings are laid out in pairs on either side of a driveway,
36' apart, garage door to garage door. This is enough room for cars to maneuver into and out of
the garages, but not enough space for cars to be parked in front of the garage doors as in some
townhouse designs (that would require about 60' typically).
The buildings are arranged to be fairly close to the public and private streets serving the project,
giving it a more urban feel than many suburban townhouse projects. The fronts of the units are
typically 15' to 25' from the internal streets and parking areas, and 15' from the right -of -way of
Hazelwood Drive and Kennard Street. The actual distance from the front of the units to the curb
line of these two public streets will depend on the final design of the streets, but should be about
30'. These setbacks to the public streets are closer than required under the Zoning Code, but are
appropriate in my opinion. They are one of the features of the PUD that deserves flexibility.
The site plan preserves a portion of the tree cover on the existing property for the proposed
townhouse plan. About 7.5 acres of trees are shown north of the power line on the survey, and
about 1.4 acres or 19% are preserved in four separate areas around the site. There are three
areas in the northwest comer that are part of the current tree cover surrounding three sides of the
large wetland,, and an area east of Kennard just south of Country Road D that is currently part of
the stand along the west side of the driveway into the Hijacek homestead: All other trees on site,
except those within the delineated wetland buffers, are to be removed.
There is a fifth stand of trees of about 2/10 acre, also on the east side of Kennard, south of stand
noted above, that had been shown on earlier plans as being preserved. In order to save that
stand, however, it would have been surrounded on three sides by a retaining wall about 8 feet in
height, due to the grades on site. This retaining wall would have filled the view from the first -floor
windows of buildings 16 and 17. A more reasonable solution, discussed with Hartford, is to allow
this stand to be removed, the ground graded down closer to the level of the new buildings and
some of the transplanted trees removed from various parts of the site replaced here. This would
avoid a very costly retaining wall (the cost of the retaining wall alone around this small stand of
trees would have been about as much as the combined total for all of the new landscape materials
being planted for the entire townhouse project). Moreover, the retaining wall would not have been
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003
as attractive to future residents as a stand of trees at eye level. There will still be a significant
stand of trees in this location, but transplanted trees, not the original stand.
Street System
Private streets and driveways serve all parts of the rental townhome plan, on both sides of
Kennard Street. On the west side a single major drive connects Kennard with Hazelwood. On the
east side a single major drive connects Kennard to a roundabout at the multi - family and retail
sites, then turns north to connect with County Road D. On both sides minor drives connect into
the actual units and their garages. No garages access directly out to these major private drives.
Several features of the internal roadway system for the townhome plan are worth commenting on:
• The west side major drive makes a "bump" in the middle of its run to avoid an existing
telephone pole. This curve will cause headlights to shine into the units on either side of it.
While the bump may be unavoidable I suggest it be flattened as much as possible to
reduce the number of units affected.
• The same headlight issue might be a concern on the first curve west of Kennard in the big
"S" that the roadway makes entering the site past the clubhouse. Westbound cars could
shine into the units in building 11. However, my sight line analysis shows that the
proposed landscaping on the north side of the roadway consisting of evergreen shrubs, if
allowed to grow to 3' or 4' tall, will screen the headlights.
• On the east side of Kennard the roundabout (where the townhomes, multi - family site, and
retail site come together) is a good idea, giving some character and identity o the area, ' as
well
as handling traffic well.
• The roundabout noted above. and the connecting roadway link out to County Road D
should be constructed with the townhomes, regardless of when or if the multi- family and
retail parcels to the east are developed.
Visitor and Overflow Parking
There are good examples of projects around the region that have a minimal 35' spacing between
P g
garages, but also many with the more common 60' dimension allowing parking. With the proposed
design there needs to be adequate visitor and overflow parking near each buildin g in order for it to
function well, to make up for the two spaces per unit in front of the garage door that are lost .in this
layout. The parking issue is one of the shortcomings in the earlier versions of the Legacy
townhome plan that is improved with anticipated revisions.
Townhouse projects need visitor and overflow parking spaces in a ratio of about 112 space per
unit, evenly distributed around the site, based on my experience in other projects. The spaces
should be arranged such that no unit is more than about 200' from a group of 5 or 6 parking
spaces. This is equivalent to a little over half a block, and is what most single family
neighborhoods expect in terms of parking in one's driveway or on the street for visitors. If a single
family home had no driveway parking available and no parking at all for more than half a block
from the home, it would be a real inconvenience*.
With on- street parallel parking on the private streets and additional small arkin areas scattered
P 9
throughout the site, the Legacy townhome site plan (6/2/03) originally showed 64 surface parking
Legacy Village PUD I June 30, 2003
spaces for 198 units, or less than 1/3 space per unit. About 20% of the units would have had no
visitor parking at all within 200' and some units with close arkin would have less p 9 s than 1I2 space
per unit in. those nearby parking areas. - Parking. will not to be allowed on Hazelwood
Drive and
Kennard Street, so they cannot be part of the parking solution.
A total of 99 visitor parking spaces need to be provided, spread evens throughout '
P Y ghout the project as
described above, which could involve one or a combination of the following: parallel 9 p ilel parking on
some of the internal streets; parking areas where some are shown now; and p arkin g
spaces at the ends of the driveways (if turnarounds a p g
Y re provided to get. in and out of these
spaces). Hartford has agreed to revise the plans to show more visitor arkin using some
these suggestions. P 9 g e or all of
Sidewalk/Trail S stem
A well- planned and comprehensive sidewalk/trail system will be essential ntial to the success of Legacy
Village as a pedestrian - friendly development. There are sidewalks serving ach tow
but there are a few notable 9 nhome unit,
gaps in the system that I believe need to be addressed:
• There is a sidewalk shown on the south side of Count Road D along
a of the � Y ng the entire northern
edge e rental townhome sites, but it does not appear on the City's design for Count
significant piece Y g Y
Road D. This is a si
9 p of sidewalk continuity that I believe is important to
Legacy Village, as noted above.
• There needs to be a sidewalk connection to the clubhouse on the north side of the access
drive from the group of townhomes west of the clubhouse.
• Immediately west of Kennard there is a gap in the sidewalk on the south side of s
w buildings
13 and 14, which would allow pedestrians to e g
. p get out to Kennard and then south to the
power line trail and park. This is being addressed by Hartford with a modest realignment of
the power line trail to allow better 9 rades
• Nest of Kennard on the south side of the major drive there should be sidewalk connections
at two points to allow pedestrians to access the trail along the power line, and from there to
the park.
• A third sidewalk connection would be desirable between the "bump" in the drive and
r
Kennard Street but the p
grades there are a challenge. I would suggest some attempt be
made to put in such a connection, since children will make the trek u the slope pe in that
i
location whether there s a sidewalk or not, rather than go several hundred feet out of their
way to the next nearest sidewalk connection.
East of Kennard it would also be desirable to have three sidewalk connections south to the
power line trail. But the elevations for the townhouse pads in this area are lowered b as
much as 10' from the current grades, making • y
g g a sidewalk connection up the slope difficult if
not impossible, and there is a storm pond behind the eastern pair of buildings that blocks
this connection as well. Hartford is a g
addressing this with the realignment of the power line
trail.
• The power line trail should be accessible, meeting ADA guidelines. The ro osed r
p p grades
may be too steep in spots and should be reviewed for compliance with ADA minimum
standards.
-7 ....,,�„ , rune 3u, ZuuJ 6
Architecture
I believe the architectural design of the townhomes is attractive and well done and I have no
further comments or suggestions on it.
The architectural plans will be submitted for review by the community design review board after
the city council has reviewed the land use and zoning elements of this proposal.
Senior Assisted Living
The senior assisted - living building is placed near the corner of Kennard and Legacy Parkway to
g Y Y
anchor the intersection. The overall design places a major entrance at the corner and a vehicle
drop -off entry behind the building opposite it. Parking is under the building nd in a parking lot
9 p g
facing the pond to the east. The building is tight u against Kennard Street again P g gain reinforcing the
village character and. pedestrian environment of Legacy Villager l believe the architectural design
g
-of the senior assisted - living building is attractive and well done and I have no further comments or
suggestions on the building's appearance.
The planning commission felt that there was too much surface parking proposed. Staff concurs
suggested b the planning � '
and su
gg y p n ng commission, recommends that the seniors - budding parking be
reduced and the balance be shown as proof -of- parking on the site plan.
Furniture Store and Retail /Commercial Sites
The northeast corner of the site is occupied by commercial uses, identified as a
large furniture
store on the corner of Count Ro g
County d D and Southlawn, and a pair of smaller retail/commercial
buildings to the west. Hartford has indicated that the fumiture store is a solid
buyer but the smaller
commercial buildings are shown as a concept only and no specific buyers are lined up. In the
latest plans reviewed, the buildings on both sites were set back from Count Road D about 150.
This arrangement creates some y - •
g e awkward relationships for the commercial buildings as well as the
adjacent multi- family site. The furniture store has its parking lot divided on
- P g two sides of the
building and the smaller buildings have their back close to the multi - family site.
l suggest that both the furniture store and the retail /commercial buildings be placed close to
County Road D with their parking to the south. This would improve the site p lan as follows:
• The furniture store would have a presence on County Road D for visibility and e. si na
g g
• The furniture store would have all its parking on one side of the building. Any future
parking (noted as proof of parking on the plan) would therefore be contiguous to the
original parking lot.
The retail /commercial buildings would also have a presence on County Road D, but their
front doors would face south toward the access off the roundabout and their neighborhood
customers from the townhouses.
• The access drive from the roundabout would come right into the new front door of the
furniture store on the south side of the building.
�G v 1110 F-ULJ June jU, 1UU3 7
• A driveway onto Southlawn for the furniture store could happen a bit further north than now
shown and it would serve the front door of the building rather than the back side as on the
earlier plans. .
Office/Corporate Site
The office /corporate site is being shown in concept only and no detailed designs have been
prepared. The building is also placed tight to the intersection of Legacy Parkway and Kennard,
anchoring the comer. Parking is underneath and behind the building to the north.
Restaurant and Commercial Sites
These two parcels are also being shown in concept only, so the recommendations for them within
the PUD are generalized as well. But being opposite the major commercial areas of Maplewood
Mall, the uses are appropriate.
Multi- Family Site
The multi - family site is to be sold to another developer and is illustrated in concept only on the
PUD site plan. When developed this parcel should tie into the adjacent uses in terms of access,
sidewalk connections, architecture, and landscaping. Screening of this site from mechanical units
and loading areas of the adjacent sites will be important.
For -Sale Townhomes
The for -sale townhome site will be sold to another builder; negotiations, are under way and the
builder may be announced soon. The recommendations are, general but similar to the other sites:
connect pedestrian linkages, bring buildings close to Kennard Street, and provide adequate
parking.
Park System
Two public parks are proposed for Legacy Village, one on the west side of Kennard under the
power fine and one around the large wetland in the southeast corner of the site. These locations
will provide active and passive recreation for residents, linked -with sidewalks and trails. A water
park and small ballftelds are suggested - for the west park, while the southeast park is mostly
passive, with a trail loop around it. The city's parks director has a more detailed memorandum on
these park features and park dedication.
Tax- Abatement Financin
The city contracted with the Springsted Company, a financial -tools consultant, to analyze the
applicant's request for tax - abatement financing. Under Minnesota law, taxes due on real property
subject to tax abatement must still be paid as due. If tax abatement is in place, the appropriate
portion of the taxes can be captured and applied to development purposes. The captured taxes
must be used to offset the costs agreed to under an abatement agreement. Tax abatement can
be used to capture taxes on land and existing buildings as well as new improvements. Refer to
the ' report by Paul Steinman of Springsted on pages 62 --66.
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003
COMMISSION ACTIONS
July 7, 2003: The planning commission recommended approval of the comprehensive land use
plan amendment, conditional use permit and preliminary plat.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Adopt the resolution on P pages 67-68, approving comprehensive land use Ian amendments for
the proposed Legacy Village on the south side of County Road D between Southlawn Drive and
Hazelwood Street. These changes are based on the following findings:
• This project would promote economic development that will expand the r
P p property tax base,
increase jobs and provide desirable services.
• it would provide a wide variety of housing types
• It would integrate development with open space areas, community facilities and significant
natural features.
• Adequate services would be provided for streets, utilities drainage, ark
g , parks open space.
• This project would provide attractive surroundings at which to shop, work and live.
1) The following parcels shall remain guided as BC Business Commercial:
a. That portion of Lot 1, Block 1 comprising the office suites /clubhouse site a roughly
g Y
square area consisting of the first 265 feet south and west of the rights -of -way of
County Road D and Kennard Street, an area of 1.61 -acres;
b. Outlot A — retail /commercial;
c. Outlot C — furniture store;
d. Outlot D — commercial;
e. Outlot E — restaurant; and
f. Outlot G — corporate /commercial.
2) The following parcels shall be changed to Park:
a. Outlot F — public park; and
b. Outlot I — public park.
3) All other parcels shall- change to R -3H High Density Residential:
a. Lot 1, Block 1 — rental townhomes, except for the office suites /clubhouse site;
b. Lot 1, Block 2 — rental townhomes;
c. Lot 1, Block 3 — senior assisted living;
d. Outlot B — multi - family; and
e. Outlot H — for -sale townhomes;
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 9
4) The areas devoted to these three land use categories are as follows:
BC — Business Commercial: 19.23 acres
R3H — High Density Residential: 43.68 acres
_Park 13.64 acres
Total: 76.55 acres
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Adopt the resolution on pages 69 -79, approving a conditional use permit for a planned unit
development for the proposed Legacy Village located on the south side of County Road D between
Southlawh Drive and Hazelwood Street. Approval is based on the findings required by the code
and subject to the following code requirements:
• All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped June 12, 2003. The Director of
Community Development may approve minor changes.
• The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within
one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend
this deadline for one year.
• The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Approval is also subject to the following conditions:
1) Rental Townhomes and Office /Clubhouse:
a. The project will be constructed according to the plans from Hartford Group dated
6/2/03 in all details, except as specifically modified by these conditions;
b. A sidewalk will be provided continuously on the north or west side of Street A
between Kennard Street and Hazelwood Drive, including the segment between the
office /clubhouse parking lot and townhome buildings 11 and 12;
c. Sidewalk connections will be added connecting the power line trail to the curb of
Street A opposite townhome buildings 6 and 8;
d. The sidewalks serving the fronts of townhome buildings 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20
will be extended south to connect with the power line trail;
e. Street B and Street C serving the townhomes will be constructed in their entirety
with the townhomes, regardless of the status of the multi - family and commercial
parcels to the east;
f. Parking spaces will be provided at the ends of the driveways at the rear of buildings
1, 2, 3, 4; 13/14; 15/16; 17/18; 19/20; 21/22; 23/24; 25/26. Sidewalks will be
provided from those parking spaces to the front sidewalks of each building;
g. The infiltration trenches on the south sides of buildings 13/14, 15/16, and 19/20 will
be modified to accommodate a revised alignment for the power line trail, provided
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 10
that reasonable grades are provided for the trail and any sidewalks connecting to it,
and approval of the city engineer concerning the size and function of the trenches;
h. A 6' -wide sidewalk should be provided if at all possible on the south side of County
Road D for the entire length of the project from Hazelwood Drive to Southlawn
Drive, through continued discussion between the city and Hartford, focusing on
exact sidewalk width, location, and right-of-way needs for turn lanes and other
features of the County Road D project;
i. A sidewalk will be provided on the south side of County Road D and sidewalks will
be provided out to that sidewalk from the north side of buildings 1, 4, 21, 22, 23, 24
and 25, as well as to the clubhouse front entry and the clubhouse parking lot;
j. The grades of the power line trail and all sidewalks will meet ADA guidelines for
slope;
k. Overstory trees will be planted along both sides of Street A at an average of 30' -40'
on center instead of the average 70' spacing shown on the plans;
I. Overstory trees will be planted along both sides of Street B and on the west side of
Street C at an average of 30' -40' on center instead of the sometimes 100' spacing
shown on the plans, such additional tree islands to be coordinated with modified
parking bays that might be added to this street;
m. Overstory trees will be planted along both sides of Kennard Street in front of the
townhomes at an average of 30' -40' on center instead of the average 50' -80'
spacing shown on the plans;
n. The curve in the middle of Street A opposite buildings 10 and 12 will be flattened as
much as possible to limit headlights aimed into the front of the units;
o. Front building setbacks (clubhouse and buildings 1, 4, 5, 14, 15, 21, 22 23, 24, 25,
and 26) to Hazelwood Drive, Kennard Street, and County Road D that are less than
required by the Zoning Code are specifically approved within this PUD as shown on
the site plan, down to a minimum- of 5' for the clubhouse . and .15' for the townhome
buildings, in order to enhance the urban character of the streets and intersections;
p. Side yard building setbacks for all buildings that are less than required by the
Zoning Code are specifically approved within this PUD as shown on -the site plan;
q. Visitor parking spaces for the rental townhomes will be added or modified as
follows:
i. Parking spaces will be added so there is a total of at least 48 spaces on the
west side of Kennard and at least 51 spaces on the east side of Kennard,
such that the front door of no unit is more than 200 feet from a group of at
least 5 spaces.
ii. Street A will be widened to 26' curb -to -curb and on- street parallel parking
will be added along the north and west sides of the street except for within
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 - � 1
100' of the pavement of Hazelwood Drive and Kennard Street.
iii. The private drive immediately south of buildings 2 and 3 will be widened to
26' curb -to -curb and on- street parallel parking will be added along the north
side of the drive.
iv. Parking areas will be added behind buildings 1 and 4 where the driveway
abuts the ponding area, consistent with the recommendation of the city
engineer on providing adequate grading and functioning of the pond.
v. Parking areas will be added behind buildings 15/16, 19/20, 21/22, and 25/26
to meet the parking and distance criteria cited here.
vi. Street B will be widened to 26' curb -to -curb and parallel parking will be
added along the north and west sides of the street, or additional angled
parking will be added to meet the criteria for parking spaces cited here.
r. The parking lot for the clubhouse /office building will be modified to add "proof of
parking" spaces in the green area north and east of the swimming pool, for a total
of 91 spaces possible in the lot. Such spaces will only be constructed if the owner
believes they are needed, or if they are needed in the future to address parking
problems at the building in the opinion of the community development director, who
can order the spaces to be constructed. Such spaces will maintain a sidewalk
connection between the swimming pool and clubhouse building in an island in the
middle of the parking bays as shown on the plans;
s. An easement over the power line trail on this parcel will be provided to the city for
access and maintenance.
2) Senior Assisted .Living:
a. Front building setbacks to Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway that are less than
required by the Zoning Code are specifically approved within this PUD as shown on
the site plan, down to a minimum of 5', in order to enhance the urban character of
the streets and intersection;
b. Emergency exits — two fronting Kennard Street and one fronting Legacy Parkway —
will provide sidewalk connections to the sidewalks on the street;
c. A sidewalk connection will be provided near the south side of the building
connecting Kennard Street to the path around the pond to the east;
d. The entry at the far south end of the building will provide a sidewalk connection to
the sidewalk noted above;
e. The emergency exit on the southwest face of the building near the south end of the
building will provide a sidewalk connection to the sidewalk noted above;
f. The emergency exit on the south face of the northeastern leg of the building will
provide a sidewalk connection south to the sidewalk abutting the parking lot;
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 12
g. averstory trees will be planted along the east side of Kennard Street and
the south
side of Legacy Parkway at an average of 30' -40' on center instead of the average
80' -100' spacing shown on the plans;
h. Revise the site plan to show proof -of- parking to reduce the amount of surface
Parking.
3} Multi - Family Site (Outlot B):
a. The multi- family site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will come in for
design review and approval at a later date, but the use of the property is allowed as
long as the provisions of the R -3A or R -313 zoning district (depending on the
building size) and conditions outlined here are met;
b. The multi - family site is approved for up to 50 units of housing;
c. A building corner should be within 30' of the curb on the roundabout to maintain the
character of the intersection,
d. The building or buildings must be designed to continue the general pattern and
sight lines of the townhomes to the west;
e. Sidewalk, connections must be provided. to the power line trail on the south side of
the parcel;
f. Visitor parking must be provided at a ratio of 112 space per unit no more than .200'
from the front door of any unit if townhomes are built, or the front entry of the
apartment building. if apartments are built;
g. A play area or tot lot must be provided on site with easy access to the building
entries and to the power line trail, within reasonable sight of as many of the units as
possible;
h. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
p 9
the adjacent townhomes and other buildings if present;
i. averstory trees must be planted along the north side of the extension of Street B at
an average of 30' -40' on center;
j. An easement over the power line trail on this parcel will be provided to the city for
access and maintenance.
4) Retail/Commercial (Outlot A):
a. The retail /commercial site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will come
in for design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as long as
the provisions of the BC zoning district and conditions outlined here are met;
b. The building(s) on the retail/commercial site should be sited on the north side of the
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 13
parcel within 15' of the County Road D right -of -way with all parking to the south;
c. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall not exceed 12 feet in height;
d. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the adjacent townhomes and other buildings if present;
e. Access to the site will be off the east leg of the roundabout and another access
drive off Street C between the roundabout and County Road D; and to County Road
D at a shared driveway with the adjacent furniture store site;
f. All ground - mounted and roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to ordinance;
g._ Overstory trees must be planted along the south side of the extension of Street B at
an average of 30' -40' on center.
h. Adequate separation, buffering and screening must be provided for the multi- family
residential units from the front doors, parking areas, loading areas, and mechanical
equipment of this commercial building;
5) Furniture Store (Outlot C):
a. The furniture store is planned in concept only within the PUD and will come in for
design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as long as the
provisions of the BC zoning district and conditions outlined here are met;
b. The building should be sited on the north side of the parcel within 15' of the County
Road D and Southlawn Drive rights -of -way with all parking to the south. The design
of the corner of the building should be such that reasonable. and safe sight
distances are maintained at County Road D and Southlawn;
c. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall not exceed 12 feet in height;
d. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the adjacent townhomes and other buildings if present;
e. Access to the site will be off the extension of the east leg of the roundabout, to
County Road D at a shared driveway with the adjacent retail /commercial site and
up to two driveway accesses to Southlawn Drive at points to be approved by the
city engineer;
f. All ground- mounted and roof- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to ordinance;
g. Overstory trees must be planted along the west side of Southlawn Drive at an
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 14
average of 30' -40' on center.
h. Adequate separation, buffering and screening must be provided for the multi - family
residential units from the front doors, parking areas, loading areas, and mechanical
equipment of this commercial building.
6) Commercial Site (Outlot D):
a. The commercial site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will come in for
design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as long as the
provisions of the BC zoning district and conditions outlined here are met;
b. One of the buildings on the commercial site should be sited close to the corner of
Southlawn Drive and Legacy Parkway, within 30' of the Southlawn Drive right -of-
way;
c. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall " not exceed 12 feet in height;
d. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the nearby senior assisted - living building, townhomes and other buildings if present;
e. Access to the site will be off Legacy Parkway and onto Southlawn if approved by
the city engineer;
f. All ground - mounted and roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to ordinance;
g. The parking lot on this site must provide through connections and cross parking
easements with the parcel to the south (Outlot E);
h. There must be sidewalks connecting entries to all buildings on site to Legacy
Parkway, South'iawn Drive, the path around the pond to the west, and to Outlot E.
Such sidewalks must be separated from the parking lot — at curb level, not parking
lot level;
i. Uses on the site are encouraged to take advantage of the park and trail system
around the ponding area to the west by providing outdoor seating, plazas,
overlooks or similar features;
j. Overstory trees must be planted along the north side of Legacy Parkway and the
west side of Southlawn Drive an average of 30' -40' on center.
k. An easement over the power line trail on this parcel will be provided to the city for
access and maintenance.
7) Restaurant Site (Outlot E):
a. The restaurant site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will come in for
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 15
design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as long as the
provisions of the BO zoning district and conditions outlined here are met;
b. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall not exceed 12 feet in height;
c. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping, with
the nearby senior assisted - living building, townhomes and other buildings if present;
d. Access to the site will be off a shared driveway with the shopping center property to
the south, provided easements and agreements can be reached with that property
owner to provide such access. Access will be provided onto Southlawn if approved
by the city engineer;
e. All ground- mounted and roof- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to the ordinance;
f. The parking lot on this site must provide through connections and cross parking
easements with the parcel to the north (Outlot D);
g. There must be a sidewalk on the south side of the site connecting Southlawn Drive
with the trail around the ponding area to the west. There must also be sidewalks
connecting the building entry to the shared driveway on the south side, Southlawn
Drive, and to Outlot D. Such sidewalks must be separated from the parking_ lot — at
curb level, not parking lot level;
h. Uses on the site are encouraged to take advantage of the park and trail system
around the ponding area to the west by providing outdoor seating, plazas,
overlooks or similar features;
Overstory trees must be planted along the west side of Southlawn Drive and the
north side of the driveway access on the south, side of the site at an average of 30'-
40' on center.
8} Corporate /Commercial Site (Outlot G):
a. The corporate /commercial site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will
come in for design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as
long as the provisions of the BC zoning district and conditions outlined here are
met;
b. The building must be sited close to the roundabout intersection on the corner of
Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway, within 15' of both rights -of -way, to maintain
the character of the intersection, with parking to the north and east of the building;
c. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall not. exceed. 12 feet in height;
d. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
Legacy Tillage PUD June 30, 2003 16
the nearby senior assisted- living building, townhomes and other buildings if present;
e. Access to the site will be off Legacy Parkway and Kennard Street. The driveway
access to Kennard Street at the northwest corner of the site may move north if
needed for the realignment of the power line trail and to align with the driveway
entrance to the park on the .west side of Kennard;
f. All ground- mounted and roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to ordinance;
g. There must be sidewalks connecting entries to all buildings on site to Legacy
Parkway, Kennard Street, and through the parking lot to the power line trail;
h. Uses on the site are encouraged to take advantage of the park and trail system
around the ponding area to the west by providing outdoor seating, plazas,
overlooks or similar features;
i. Qverstory trees must be planted along the east side of Kennard Street and the
north side of Legacy Parkway at an average of .30' -40' on center.
j. Adequate separation, buffering and screening must be provided for the multi - family
residential units from the front doors, parking areas, loading areas, and mechanical
equipment of this commercial building.
9) For -Sale Townhomes (Outlot H):
a. The for -sale townhome site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will
come in for design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as
long as the provisions of the R -3G zoning district and conditions outlined here are
met;
b. Townhome buildings must be sited close to the roundabout intersection on the
corner of Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway, and close to Kennard Street, within
20' of both rights -of -way, to maintain the character of the intersection and the
streetscape;
c. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the nearby senior assisted- living building, townhomes and other buildings in the
development;
d. Access to the site will be off the west leg of the roundabout at Legacy Parkway and
Kennard Street, plus another access to Kennard Street further south, most likely in
a loop street through the site. If the properties west of Outlot H fronting Hazelwood
Drive are likely to develop when Outlot H is proposed for development, then
consideration will be given to a public through street connecting Kennard Street and
Hazelwood Drive as an extension of Legacy Parkway;
e. There must be sidewalks connecting entries to all buildings on site to Legacy
Parkway, Kennard Street, and the park and power line trail to the north. Such
sidewalks must be designed within a clear system of open spaces and landscaping
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 17
that serves all units more or less equally;
f. Visitor parking must be provided at a ratio of 112 space per unit no more than 200'
from the front door of any townhouse unit;
g. Overstory trees must be planted along the west side of Kennard Street and along
both sides of the major internal street(s) at an average of 30' -40' on center.
10) Public Park with Trail (Outlot F):
a. The property will be deeded to the City as public park land, but will not be credited
as land area in park dedication requirements. See Parks Director Bruce
Anderson's memorandum (attached).
b. Hartford will construct all the grading, ponding, and trails noted on the plans;
c.. Hartford will secure all necessary- easements and agreements with the shopping
.center property owner to the south for grading and construction of the trail on the
south side of the pond (and the extension of that trail west around the south side of
the senior assisted living building noted previously). Once agreed to, an easement
at least 5' wider than the trail surface will be dedicated to the city for access and
maintenance of the trail.
11) Public Park (Outiot I):
a. The property will be deeded to the City as public park land, but will not be credited
as land area in park dedication requirements. See -Parks Director Bruce
Anderson's memorandum (attached).
b.. Hartford will construct all the grading, play fields, equipment, and parking noted on
the plans or as negotiated with the city;
c. The power line trail will be realigned to cross Kennard Street further north to
accommodate sidewalk connections to the townhomes to the north;
d. Sidewalk connections will be provided in several locations to the power line trail in
reasonable locations to connect all major activity areas with the trail;
e. Sidewalk connections will be provided in appropriate locations to the sidewalk and
green space system of the town home'development to the south, at such time as
that development is planned or in place;
f. Hartford will secure easements and agreements with the property owner to the
south for the trail on the south side of the pond (and the extension of that trail west
around the south side of the senior assisted - living building noted previously). Once
agreed to, an easement at least 5' wider than the trail surface will be dedicated to
the city for access and maintenance of the trail.
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 18
12) The Legacy Village site as a whole:
a. The applicant shall dedicate wetland- protection buffers around each wetland within
this development. The width of each buffer shall be according to each wetlands
classification as determined by the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District.
These buffers shall be dedicated to the City of Maplewood and shall be dedicated
to the city prior to the issuance of the first building permit for this development.
b. The applicant shall install wetland- protection buffer signs around each wetland
buffer. These signs shall state "there shall be no mowing, cutting, filling or dumping
beyond this point.'
c. The community design review board shall review the landscape plans using the
criteria herein as a guide.
d. The architectural plans for all buildings in Legacy Village are subject to the approval
of the community design review board.
e. The grading, drainage, erosion control, utility and roadway plans (public and
private) are subject to the approval of the city engineer.
f. The applicant shall meet the tree- replacement/tree- preservation requirements of
the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
g. The city will be strictly enforcing the 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. no -noise requirement and
strictly enforcing dust - control efforts for all phases of this development.
h.. The applicant shall coordinate the installation of the sidewalk along the County
Road D alignment with the city engineer.
Preliminary Plat
Approval of the Legacy Village preliminary plat date - stamped June 12, 2003, subject to the
following conditions:
1 } Public street right -of -way will be dedicated for County Road D, Kennard Street, Legacy
Parkway and Southlawn Drive as recommended by city engineering consultant Jon Homirr
his memorandum. In addition, the applicant shall dedicate the necessary right -of -way for-
sidewalk along the County Road D alignment, subject to the city engineer's approval.
2) Outlot f and Outlot I will be dedicated to the city for public park purposes as recommended
and approved by the city parks director;
3) An easement over the power line trail will be dedicated to the city as required by the city
engineer and parks director, and as modified by conditions of approval for the PUD;
4) Wetland buffer easements shall be shown around the wetlands on the site. The applicant
shall dedicate these wetland buffer easements to the City of Maplewood.
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 19
Tax - Abatement Financing
Authorize the preparation of a development agreement with the Hartford Group, Inc. providing a
tax abatement not to exceed a present value of $3.8 million.
p :com_dvpt\sec3 \LegacyVillage \TE rev
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Map (existing)
3. Land Use Map (proposed)
4. Property Line /Zoning Map
5. Legacy Village PUD (overall site plan)
6. Building Numbering Reference Plan & Acreage /Density Table
7. Applicant's Narrative_ dated June 11, 2003
8. Memo from Jon Horn dated June 25, 2003
9. Memo from Bruce Anderson dated June 25, 2003
10. Tax - Abatement Memo from Springsted dated July 2, 2003
11--- Land Use Plan Resolution
12. CUP/PUD Resolution
13. Plans date - stamped June 12, 2003 (separate attachment)
14. Area Town House and Multi- Family Developments (separate attachment)
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003 20
- Attachment 1
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
61
COUNTY RD. D ,
r COUNTY ROAD
HIGHRIDGE CT. - ,
W PROPOSED t WOODLY
° LEGACY VILLAGE
z
SITE
4. 't . Q� LYDiA Q tL a. ►
L-A .
�� ST JOHN'S v m
2 1 SUMMIT CT'. BLVD. W
Z. COUNTRYVIEW CIR, z = o m
_ 3. 3. DULUTH
G� 4. LYDIA AVE. ~ l ` v
4'
BEAM (n' A VE.
�.
f A
CL BEAD P 4' .
tit Y
r RADATZ 4
f Q t
vMaricham I
AV
'ohirban � { �� � _ �? � �� Pond; • RA1rtSEY
t, LQItC P ` 0 . COU
COURT
KOHIJAAN AVE.
w x0iiL MAN ti
z - Casey
w o AVE. =Lake ` Pe
Park
COUNTY ROAD C w
' Kra T
cn pw* CZ z =o U)
_ OW U
r W
x v CON NOR v EDGEHlLL RD.
AVF
- AVE DEMOt3T AVE
Q g.
• W a zz "" BROOKS AVE ROOKS � _j E � .
t AVE. 4
TH
s C Z
SEXTANT AVE
a sac TANT a�
GEWAIs
AVE y. GERVAtS w cc
v < GERVAIS
4 v GRANDV'IEW AVE Z CT.
• Y
i VIKING pR,
�n SHERREN AVE
COPE Knuck Head Lake CASTLE AVE.
(i
I z ` ✓ COPE AVE PF ® G
` - - LARK
AVE. LARK 4 r�i Sri
° CO. '� RD. �" RD.
�- a a. LAURIE RD.
v LAURIE °'
LEAi.AND f Z "ra LAURIE Z RD_ w
`* RD_ c� Q SAND URST AVE w
CC Z � 0 w U C=j try
rr
>- JUNCTION AVE w z Z . - z z • Q
7knber _..i _ A B y W CO. RD. B
pzrk J G?l Q BURKE AVE o r-
Z a ® BURKE AVE. c star
ELDR IDG AVE 3:: Jotn MOM
C% ` Ohl
MM
LOCATION MAP
21
N
Attachment 2-
interahange
Vadnais Heights ,
--em
I
minor arterial
M -1
• ' tea,• ;� i -��--
mz
` -
- -�r C 0 =
major - IIector '
now-
M
=%
/ maj "rtwial. .
L � -
i C
>v W
4
U 'U
y
C
0
o
E
s
� et -
max
I
••
J
SIEMWAND
IL
f
i
•
_ 1
•
s �
4
U 'U
y
C
0
o
E
Attachment 3
LEGACY VILLAGE AT MAPLEWOOD
MAP LEWOOD , MINNESOTA
S ;_b;� R•n tY .._•� ----------------------- ------- .. ............
w ----------------
lie ...........
------- .. •_ r'' ----- - -� - � ��s -- •----- - - -•-- �- ... - - -•• ' � �. 1 � � r ' ..... ................. •... __._.... 1'0..=_=� ---- k -------------- -------- ----------------- ------- .
i -- --- - - - - -- .7 ''�:- - - -71= -+ lam - -� -- . - J - �; - �',L -1,:- - - - - - -- ' -•-
------- ;r — — - COUN RCIA( 0
I I MT W
ONO JJF@A.
I
I 1.1a B
1
.A:n «gin• \ . uua� I
MOT
flirrm-ru :4
�N1 I FURNITURE i� 1
/ � �• \ ` •\ • � 1�'AV0120'MMI. NOTOUC� - ( ..,
I I STORE
. = 44,080 S
ENTA F
402 AC 1 i
/ I \ I
.. j� 1
R / -
1 : ■ 1 � (;
��' � � �,. �.• . � � - � I N , � 137 PKG SP ,
_
R 3H
KG SP P ii
IF
I I ; VA p i — n fiflL
' 2.34 AC. 1 - '
..................... +�
- •------° _ r r ::7_ly: �dt[' _ ....... ....---_ ^ ................,
PIC ..r
. y; r._A�.. _C...._r•_•__ - r_.:..: �4'YATER� ri•- -' _ ._....... -_ :• •' j:1v .......... _.... �:::........_.. _. __ .'C:, ...__.. ':::_.v.� .. -
_- . --�= PO ND PO_I
V& � � 1 , : i
•. e I (!7 Y I� �- —PLAY' LR " . . i 1:1��
r uu
J r..
--- ..• .
:0... 41J of 1 e
,3 ,_., . 4+-+ OUTLOT
LJ 3" 31W AM NPACM
n'1
OUTLOT
CLAM R r:
1: it
rr
-- •� WETIMID BUFFER It
(WAVOWNIL+.T+oT000tr ; I; • I
Ol'��
OUTL '- H 1 R R 3 ..
r. j—
j : •: . POND 4i
0.67 Ac tLIC PARK WITM i
........
PROPOSED VACATED ROW (l i ' TRAIL
X .
i � 14 _ � I � � - '_p, ...W ETLAND 9iw.� \ ''•�• '� `. � ' ��
I j •.vt lm 7Pi91G41 t i ��// 1
wtiH'.iN7'iAPEMTN$•T�AIL RESTAURANT
:ilu / . SITE
i I O 3� .�:•�:.:. �., :�.� 1.50 AC.
Q I FIL w POND OUTLOT I I
1 �j ��
+— - - - - BAST J - _' 1' 0,83 Ac
j
ORAlEJt WI7H REPAY. � ,
. CENIERTO THE BOUM' •
LAND USE MAP
PROPOSED
2'1
4
N
Attachment 4
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
24
4
N
SCALE, V- IW
LEGACY VILLAGE AT NgA]P]L]EWOOD
MAPLEWOOD, I ]ESOTA
P OND
............
4F
...... ...
Ln •
Y -J 12 is
f._1 O/
---------------------------- -- ------------
-A — 4. — — — — — — — -
COUNTYROAD Q
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
TINE
S ER
qF C A ii
A
DRUM
�aFEw + ' F U RNITURE
IE
120' MIN. STORE Is
".080 SF
4.02 AC.
ARCHITECTIENGINEER
DEVELOPER
WATFORD
aKOUr
'640 be iftl d t Ads *I momb
pNael a sww
ReIM:n Na 21751
TRUCTURAL ENGINEER
�� Hanuschak '
Can lt.nfs
lnc0$rprratad YL
p3a l►,
r'lla FAl- ZU-914-illl
Aa".M.W—
OWNER
LEGACY VILLAGE
of MAPLEWOOD, LLC
PROJECT
HUD PROJECT llUMEIR.
000-00000 0
REGENT at
MAPLEWOOD
ENIOR HOUSING
COMMUNITY
AND
RENTAL
OWNHOMES1
AT
.LEGACY
VILLAGE
OF
MAPLEWOOD
coutfry K"l) u.
m71m WOOD 4%vv.&%0
SM111AWN WWI
m"u%00D m"Esou
3/3103 - cill susuirrAl
6/2/03 - CITY SUBWIT
c
C+
MV. THIS SHEET
0 NO REV. THIS SHEET
►D
MEET TITLE;
PREUMINARY Ln
PLAT
SHEET NUMISM
P-1
Attachment 6
Wr , 0
L1 Bk1 Office /Clubhouse
OutlotA Commercial
Outlot C Furniture
Outlot D Commercial
Outlot E Restaurant
Outlot G Corporate
Subtotal BC
Total
j j
1 - - • tic.
Density
8.7
13.2
21.4
42.0
12.6
14.1 un /ac
net
Subtotal for Density 57.32 618 units 10.8 un /ac
gross
Legacy Village
Townhome Buildings and Streets
Legacy Village Maplewood
Acreage /Density
Parcel
Acreage
Units
L1 Bk1 Rental TH
11.00
96
L1 Bk2 Rental TH
7.70
102
Outlot B Multi- Family
2.34
50
L1 Bk3 SeniorAss't
2.86
120
Outlot H For -Sale TH
19.78
250
Subtotal R -3H
43.68 acres
618 units
Outlot F Park
11:39
Outlot I Park
2.25
Subtotal Park
13.64 acres
1.61
2.29
4.02
3.35
1.50
6.46
'19.23 acres
76.55 acres 618 units
r
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003
26
Attachment 7
LEGACY VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD
A MIXED -USE INTERGENERATIONAL COMMUNITY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
June 11, 2003
Revised Narrative in Support of
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Preliminary and Final Plat Approval
Planned Unit Development Approval
and Community Design Review Board Approval for an
Intergenerational and Mined -Use Neighborhood Project
27
Legacy Village of Maplewood.
Maplewood, Minnesota
DEVELOPER
Hartford Group, Inc.
Elizabeth Kautz
Executive Vice President
12100 Singletree Lane Suite 112
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
952 -746 -1200
Fax: 952- 746 -1201
www.hartfordgrp.com
ARCHITECTS/ENGINEER
Hartford Group, Inc.
Hal Pierce, AIA
Patrick Sarver, ASLA
Jon Theis, Pt
12100 Singletree Lane Suite 112
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
952 -746 -1200
Fax: 952 -746 -1201
www.hartfordgrp.com
ATTORNEY
William C. Griffith, Jr.
Neal J. Blanchett
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.
7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Suite 1500
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
(952) 896 -3290
Fax: (952) 896-3333
wgdffith@lhdl.com
nblanchett@a,lhdl, coin
I.
THE PROPERTY
Prior Review
The Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan (the "AUAIV) was approved on May 12, 2003 The Project
concept has been introduced and reviewed extensively by City staff and City officials, most
recently at the May 19, 2003 City Council meeting. The AUAR analyzed development of two
areas, Sub -Area 1 (82.2 acres with one farmstead residence) and Sub -Area 2 (4.6 acres in five
residential homesites. The Project is planned for Sub -Area 1, and for compatibility with
redevelopment of Sub -Area 2.
PropertyLocation and Boundaries
The Property is 82.2 acres located west of the Maplewood Mall, south of Interstate 694 and east
of Highway 61. It is bounded on the east by Southlawn Drive, on the north by County Road D on
the west by Hazelwood Street, and on the south by the St. John's hospital campus and
development adjoining Kennard Street and north of Beam Avenue.
Property Use and Adjacent Uses
The Property is currently primarily open land, including one farmstead residence and some
wetland and forested areas. On the west edge, there is AUAR Sub -Area 2, a row of five existing
residences totaling 4.6 acres. Maplewood Mall is to the east; townhomes and retail development
is to the north,' and senior housing, retail, and medical facilities to the south and southwest. The
Developer is the equitable title owner of the Property by way of an executed purchase agreement.
II.
THE LEGACY VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
L
Proposed DevelODment Plan
Transportation improvements divide the Property into four main sections: northeast, northwest,
southeast, and southwest. An east -west trail bounds the north one -third (24.8 acres) of the
Property. Kennard Street, extended north through the Property, divides the Property .
approximately in half, east and west. Legacy Parkway divides the eastern portion of the property
approximately in half, north and south. All four sections feature mixed uses.
The northwest portion is primarily residential, with an executive office suites and clubhouse. A
wetland buffer is planned near the northwest corner.
The three -story clubhouse /community center mixes the communal use supporting the residential
townhome neighborhood with commercial office use. The building footprint is 8, 625 square feet;
total floor area is 25,085 square feet. The building's upper two stories are small-scale office
spaces for commercial tenants, in size ranges from 124 square feet to 248 square feet. Seventy
W
eight (78) offices are planned, supported by 2 conference rooms, a copy center, clubroom,
exercise room,. and media room.
The northeast portion is a mixture of residential townhomes, multifamily housing,
retail/commercial, corporate /commercial site, and a 44,080 square foot retail building (shown on
the Site Plan as "Furniture Store ").
The southeast portion is oriented around a greenspace, wetland buffer, and pond. Three
retail/restaurant locations are east of the greenspace, nearest Maplewood Mall and adjacent to
Southlawn Drive. At the intersection of Legacy Parkway and Kennard Street, a 120 -unit assisted -
living senior residence is planned.
The southwest portion is planned for residential development and a park area for amenities. A
pond . is planned in the northwest corner. The north edge is a playground /park complex, featuring
athletic fields, play structures, picnic areas, and a small parking area. The rest of this southwest
portion is planned as for sale townhomes. The residential area is 19.78 acres. In addition to
providing a border between uses, the central trail and trail network are an important feature of the
Project. The interior trail network allows easy walking access throughout Legacy Village, and is
a significant benefit to residents and families. The central trail connects to Southlawn Drive in the
east for easy access to Maplewood Mall and the surrounding retail and commercial development.
Property and Building Description
The north portion is proposed to develop first, with the senior assisted -living building and
multifamily rowhouses. The senior building, called The Regent at Maplewood, is modified C-
shape, oriented north/south with the wings extending to the east. It is served by a surface parking
area to its east, with 56 stalls. There will also be 71 underground garage parking stalls, with an
entrance and exit at the southeast corner of the building. Ponds, wetlands, and public space
borders The Regent to the east.
The multi - family rowhouses are oriented in paired rows, both east -west and north- south. The
pairing allows front yards to face each other, with garages facing each other similar to historic
alleys. Each rowhome building has from five to nine units. The rowhomes are designed in a
traditional two -story style, with rockfaced architectural block foundation treatments and shingled
gabled roofs. Details are traditional mullioned windows, with arched and bay windows and
shutters. Features such as turrets, varied front entrance styles, and roof peak windows provide
individuality for each home. Each home has an attached two -car garage, with an additional 64
surface parking spaces, for the 198 units.
Access and Traffic Characteristics
Vehicular access to and from Legacy Village of Maplewood is provided at several. points..
Kennard Street runs through the middle of the Property. Access points to both sides branch off
from Kennard Drive. Kennard connects Beam Avenue and County Road D, providing convenient
access either the north or south. Legacy Parkway connects Kennard and Southlawn Drive,
providing access to the Furniture Store and the three retail/restaurant sites.
30
The Project assists in implementing a key recommendation of the 2001 Maplewood Mall Area
Comprehensive Traffic Study (the "2001 Traffic Study "). County Road D currently intersects
Trunk Highway 61 approximately 330 feet south of the Interstate 694 South Ramp. Between
Trunk Highway 61 and white Bear Avenue, County Road D is disjointed at the railroad crossing
west. of Hazelwood Avenue. As a result, traffic near the Maplewood Mall cannot access Trunk
Highway 61 via County Road D. The 2001 Traffic Study recommended reconnecting of County
Road D between white Bear Avenue and Trunk Highway 61 to better distribute trips in the
Maplewood Mall area. Preliminary design concepts reconnect County Road D to Trunk Highway
61 approximately 1,915 feet south of the I -694 South Ramp and reestablish County Road D as a
through street between Trunk Highway. 61 and White Bear Avenue, as recommended in the 2001
Traffic Study.
The County Road D alignment has been approved. County Road D will border the Property on
the north side. This is the preferred alignment analyzed in the AUAR, and therefore the AUAR
traffic study analysis applies.
The AUAR found that Legacy Village's mixed -use concept, internal trails, compact design, and
location at a retail center were likely to significantly reduce trips. The AUAR. traffic analysis also
found that most intersections would operate at a Level Of Service (LOS) D or E in the future,
assuming typical trip generation growth. The LOS D and E designations are. considered minimally
acceptable or below acceptable. This suggests that the Property can only be developed with a
strong mixed -use, trip - reducing design emphasis.
The AUAR generally found that even without the County Road D realignment, the Project would
degrade only one intersection from acceptable to below - acceptable levels. With the County Road
D realignment and no other improvements, one below- acceptable intersection (Trunk Highway 61
and Beam Avenue) would improve to acceptable service. Acceptable service at that intersection
would increase traffic flow to the Trunk Highway 61 ramps to Interstate 694, causing those ramps
to perform at below - acceptable levels. Adding left -turn lanes at the Trunk Highway 61 ramps to
Interstate 694 would improve that intersection to LOS C.
The AUAR notes these issues, and recommends appropriate mitigation measures. These
mitigation measures are proposed to be incorporated through the City's Site Plan Review process,
and in the final plan for improvements to County Road D.
Trip Generation
SRF Consulting studied trip generation rates, including analysis and incorporation of the City's
2001 Traffic Study, in connection with the AUAR. The trip generation analysis concluded that
redevelopment of the entire AUAR site (including both Sub -Areas 1 and 2) would generate
11,505 daily trips, including 1,178 p.m. peak hour trips. This trip generation is approximately
equivalent to the trip generation assumed in the City's 2001 Traffic Study. The proposed Project
is reduced from that size by eating the AUAR Sub -Area 2.
Parking
31
Parking has been designed beyond the concept level for the Regent senior building and the multi-
family rowhomes. The 120 -unit Regent provides 127 total stalls, 56 surface and 71 underground
garage stalls, for a ratio of 1.06 stalls per unit. Since the Regent is proposed as senior assisted
living, both car use and car ownership rates are significantly lower for building residents than for
multi - family uses. This ratio has been adequate for similar buildings in the past. City regulation
(§ 36 -22) generally provides for 2 stalls per unit for multi - family buildings. There is no separate
requirement for assisted - living buildings or similar uses such as nursing homes. It is believed that
the ratio represents adequate parking for the purposes of PUD approval.
The 198 -unit rowhome area is designed with attached two -car garages for each home and 64
additional surface stalls, for a parking ratio of 2.3 stalls per unit. This exceeds the 2 stalls per unit
regulation for single - family homes in City Code § 36 -22.
Stormwater
The City has approved a regional stormwater treatment plan for a larger area including the Project
Property. Regional treatment needs and calculations were performed in analyzing and
formulating that plan. The Developer has worked with the plan drafters to ensure that the Project
is constructed with the required improvements to Comply with and further the plan. The Proj ect
stormwater have not been calculated at this time. As the site plan is developed, the Developer
will complete stormwater calculations implementing the results of the plan.
III.
COMPLL4LNCE WITH LAND USE CONTROLS
Comprehensive Plan
Legacy Village at Maplewood is a mixed -use development planned to include for -sale
townhomes /condominiums, 198 rowhome units, 50 attached multi - family units, and 120 senior
residence units in its residential areas, 87,3 80 square feet of retail and restaurant space in six
buildings, and one 140,000 square -foot corporate /commercial building. The Legacy Village
conforms generally with the goals of Maplewood's Comprehensive Plan. Legacy Village is
designed to further the Comprehensive Plan goal to promote economic development by
establishing a new off ce /commercial area complementing the existing Maplewood Mall. Legacy
Village minimizes the area planned for streets by serving the entire 82 -acre site by adding two
interior streets, Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway, and allowing access from perimeter roads
and internal connection. A single unified design nz > ; es site conflicts and allows development
to integrate with natural features and community facilities, including a unified trail network.
Legacy Village provides a variety of housing types, including apartments, townhomes, rowhomes,
and senior assisted -living homes. Land Use Goals, Plan p. 18 -19.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Legacy Village site for Business Commercial
development. The Business Commercial designation is the broadest and most flexible commercial
(non - industrial) designation. Maplewood's Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Commercial
development today calls for greater flexibility. The City has enacted a policy to "Use Planned
Unit Developments whenever practical" in both Commercial and Residential areas. The Plan's
32
Transportation element identifies traffic deficiencies and, with the 2001 Traffic Study and the
Project AI.UAR, identifies County Road D realignment as a transportation improvement priority.
Several alternatives are under consideration for the final routing of County Road D; the Legacy
Village plan conforms with the recommended alternative. The Comprehensive Plan
Transportation element also designates a bikeway /trail across the Legacy site. Plan p. 134.
Legacy Village is proposed to provide this trail:
The Comprehensive Plan reflects Maplewood's policy for undeveloped land generally to remain in
holding areas, where the zoning is not yet consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan:
"Holding Areas ... It has not been the policy of the City to change
the zoning of a property until a specific development request is
approved by the City Council.... Maplewood will update the
zoning and /or the land use plan designations when a development is
proposed and approved by the City Council" Plan p. 26.
Legacy Village is in such a City designated "Holding Area." Plan p. 27. It is designated within a
Farm Residential Zoning District, which generally provides for love- density single - family
residential development (10, 000 square -foot lots). This zoning does not conform with the
Comprehensive Plan Commercial Business designation, and the Property is specifically listed as an
area on which zoning conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan.
Like other sites designated as "Holding Area" the Legacy site requires approval of a PUD or
rezoning to conform with the Comprehensive Plan. The City" s Plan calls for consideration of that
PUD or rezoning to occur concurrent with consideration of the Legacy project. The
Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Action element notes:
The City should ...Allow rezonings consistent with the Land Use
Plan.
Plan p. 34. Review of the Legacy is therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and
approval is consistent following the PUD approval or rezoning.
A PUD approval or rezoning is supported by the Comprehensive Plan. The Legacy site is within
the Hazelwood planning neighborhood. In Hazelwood, the 270 remaining undeveloped acres are
planned to be developed with a mix of multi-family residential (R3), single - family residential (RI)
manufacturing and commerciaVoffice uses. Commercial/office is planned to predominate; it is
planned for 194 of the 270 acres (72 percent). Plan, p. 36. The Commercial/office development
in the Project is proposed to occupy 18.4 acres of the Property (28.2 acres if the 9.8 -acre
greenspace area is included to forms a commercial/office campus.
The Legacy is proposed to occur following approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The
PUD allows approval of departures from the strict application of regulations, including the
restriction of one principal building per lot, for projects which are superior to development
allowed without departure from restrictions. City Code § 35 -43 8. Approval of a PUD appears
33
on the zoning map and alters the site zoning. Therefore, following approval of a PUD, Legacy
Village will conform with the zoning and the Comprehensive Plan.
The Project's mix of uses can occur following an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to allow
mixed use, from the current Business Commercial designation. This application requests that
amendment. The Project includes uses categorized as R -3H (Multiple Dwelling 8.4 - 12.0
units /acre); CO (Commercial Office); and BC (Business Commercial). The R -3H designation is
requested to be changed so that the zoning designation conforms with it. Currently two multi-
family zoning designations allow densities above the 12.0 units per acre in the R -3H
Comprehensive Plan designation. The R -3A Zoning District allows up to 17.0 units, per structure
on a 15,625- square foot -lot. City Code § 36 -119. The R -3B Zoning District allows more than
17.0 units per structure, on a one -acre lot. § 36-122. Both these Districts are subject to the
density restrictions of the Comprehensive Plan land use classification. The multifamily rowhouses
are 13 units per acre and less than 17 units per structure; other residential uses are densities
greater than 17 units per structure.. Expanding the multi - family density range in the
Comprehensive Plan will allow the zoning to conform.
As stated in the Final AUAR, the Developer and AUAR consultants met with the City and
Metropolitan staff to calculate sanitary sewer pl The parties determined that the Project I
is within existing planned capacity, and would not require an amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan sanitary sewer section.
Zonin
The Property is currently within the Farm Residential Zoning District, a designation which does
not conform to the Comprehensive Plan. The PUD approval would appear on the zoning map
and allow modification of the Farm Residential regulations to allow the Property to conform with
the Comprehensive Plan. With the PUD approval, the zoning would conform as required.
The City's PUD regulations include specific direction to allow mixed use and multi - family use: A
PUD may include townhouses, - apartment projects involving more than one building, multi -use
structures, such as an apartment building with retail shops at ground floor level, and similar
projects." City Code § 36 -438. The PUD provides broad latitude to deviate from underlying
regulations "to allow flexibility by substantial deviations from [zoning regulations] including uses,
setbacks, height and other regulations."
A PUD approval would in this case generally conform to the requirements of the closest
identifiable zoning districts. For residential portions of the Project proposed for Design Review
Board approval with this application, the closest zoning designation is the R3 District which
provides three different types of densities. The R3A district allows 3 to 17 units per structure; the
R3B District allows more than 17 units per structure, and the R.3 C district allows townhomes.
§ 36-106. Multiple dwellings are a permitted use. § 36-108.
The R3 Zoning Districts limit density through mum lot sizes, setbacks, mum unit sizes,
green area requirements, maximum building footprint limit, and separation requirements. The
initial rowhome site exceeds the 3 5% open space requirement-and exceed the one -acre minimum
34
lot size required in the R3B, as well as the less- restrictive 15,625- square -foot lot size required in
the R3A. The senior housing site does not exceed the 35% open space requirement internally;
however, it meets this standard with the adjacent public park included. The entire PUD is planned
to comply with the requirements for the Zoning Districts most similar to the planned uses, within
the modification allowed by the PUD.
The Project incorporates environmental protection required by the City Code and other applicable
regulations. Legacy Village includes natural wetland buffers and mitigation as required by City
and Watershed District regulations. The Developer will work with an urban forester to identify
trees to be saved in place or relocated on the Property with a tree spade. As noted in the AUAR,
Project construction and design will include measures to minimize impacts to Blandings' turtles
and their habitat.
PUD Requirements
The Project satisfies the five City Code requirements for PUD approval applicable to the 86 -acre
Property.
1. Certain regulations contained in this Chapter should not apply to the proposed
development because of its unique nature.
The Project's mix of uses and integration of office, retail, and multi - generational
residential design create a unique development for Maplewood, and represent the largest
acreage site for any of Hartford's mixed -use neighborhood projects. Serving the multiple
and inter - related goals of a complex mixed -use redevelopment would not be possible
without deviations from some of Maplewood's land use regulations.
J
2. The PUD would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter.
The PUD is generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. The most significant
deviation is the mix of uses and the required integrated design. The identified mitigation
in the Project area AUAR ensures that the goals of the zoning code are preserved.
3. The PUD would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would
result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter.
Each use is designed to be as consistent as much as possible with the regulations for that
use, but some flexibility in traditional zoning, which historically segregated commercial
from residential uses, is necessary for any mixed -use project. Maplewood Mall provides a
strong retail base; it is believed that mixed use development will provide more space for
retail uses seeking proximity to Maplewood Mall, Business Commercial development that
will fulfill the long - standing proposed planning for the Property, and residential
development to fulfill life -cycle and metropolitan housing goals. The Pro ect provides
significant amenities, including the open space, athletic and playfields, pond and wetland
buffers, and trail connections.
35
4. The deviations would not constitute a significant threat to the property values, safety,
health, or general welfare of the owners or occupants of nearby land.
The Project area AUAR provides a thorough study of the Project impacts and
compatibility with both adjacent uses and existing infrastructure. Implementing the steps
identified in the AUAR will ensure adequate protection of neighboring properties.
5. The deviations are required, for reasonable and practicable physical development and
are not required solely for financial reasons.
The deviations planned for the Project are required to achieve the multiple goals of mimed
use in a project of sufficient size to realize the Property's value as an asset to the City.
The PUD is proposed as a concept for the entire Property, with specific buildings proposed for
the senior residence and rowhomes. Review of the concept for the entire Property at this time
will streamline review of future buildings and elements of the PUD, provided they conform with
this initial proposed concept.
Subdivision
The entire Property proposed for PUD designation is proposed to be replatted into the first two
building sites proposed for Design Review with this application (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1) and
Outlots A through H for future Project Elements. Lots 1 and 2 comply with subdivision
regulations as shown on the Preliminary Plat. The AUAR includes detailed analysis of the
adequacy of infrastructure and suitability of the Property for this Project.
Design Review Board
Legacy Village is professionally designed by a Developer relying on aesthetics as a valued amenity
and selling point. The initial building elevations show the detail and quality materials typical of
Hartford neighborhoods. Hartford's neighborhoods also incorporate designs to enhance
walkability and promote mixed -use as a positive aspect for all uses included. Hartford has
worked with consultants and staff of other communities, and added their positive ideas to the
Legacy Village design. Hartford is requesting Maplewood's Design Review Board approval for
the initial buildings.
IV.
SUMMARY OF RATIONALE FOR PROJECT APPROVAL
1. Legacy Village provides a high - quality mixed -use development for a site which is expected to
develop pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Legacy Village is planned to conform
with that Plan and the approvals sought are specifically contemplated in the Plan.
2. The Legacy provides a mix of uses, including residential neighborhoods, small- and medium -
scale commercial sites, senior housing, and a significant office building. This mix is intended
to complement and be enhanced by Maplewood Mall and the surrounding existing
development.
36
3. Combining a mix of residential units with commercial development offers Maplewood
residents increased options to live in a pedestrian -scale neighborhood. Successful
developments throughout the metropolitan area are incorporating a mix of housing options,
and in many redeveloping suburbs, are bringing the first significant new housing options to
those communities.
4. Legacy Village includes outstanding outdoor amenities, providing ponds and wetland areas,
linking trail systems, excellent pedestrian connections to Maplewood Mall, a large green
space, and playfields. These amenities are designed to be the focus of Legacy Village and a
positive addition to Maplewood.
5. The Legacy Village is planned within the traffic capacity of adjacent roads, and provides
sufficient parking for residents, visitors, and customers.
b. The Legacy Village design incorporates, and is compatible with the approved option for
County Road D re- alignment.
7. Inclusion of the senior component meets a need for Maplewood residents as the population
ages, and addresses a growing overall need for the metropolitan population. Hartford's
Legacy Village senior living buildings allow Maplewood community residents to transition to
assisted living without breaking community and family ties.
862663.1
37
Attachment 8
Memorandum
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
R. Charles Ahl/City of Maplewood
Jon Horn
June 25, 2003
Engineering Plan Review
Hartford Group
Legacy Village at Maplewood Development
City Project D02 -18
As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the plans for the
Legacy Village at Maplewood development as proposed by the Hartford Group.
This review has' been completed considering the June 2, 2003 plan submittal to
the City. The proposed overall development includes the construction of a 120
unit assisted living senior housing facility, 198 units of rental townhomes, 50
multi - family units, 11.16 acres of retail/commercial site, a 6.46 acre
corporate /commercial site, 19.78 gross acres of for sale townhomes, 12.34 acres
of park, and an executive office suites and clubhouse.
Detailed plans have been submitted for the senior housing facility and the rental
townhomes. The following comments should be addressed by the developer.
AUAR
1. The Final AUAR included a number of comments and requirements that
need to be addressed in the final plans. A separate summary is attached
detailing these comments and requirements.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
1. It is assumed that all internal roadways shown on the preliminary plat
will be private streets with the exception of Kennard Street and Legacy
Parkway.. Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway will be public streets
designed and constructed by the City of Maplewood. The location of the
private street intersections along Kennard Street and Legacy Paxkway
need to be coordinated with the City's design for these streets. The
location of the west driveway for the rental townhomes in the northwest
corner of the site needs to be coordinated with the City's design for the
Hazelwood Street and County Road D intersection.
W
Engineering Plan Review
Hartford Legacy Village Development
June 25, 2003
Page 2 of 4
2. As shown on the preliminary plat, the right -of -way for Kennard Street
shall be 80 feet wide with additional right -of -way width to accommodate
the roundabout at Legacy Parkway.
3. The right -of -way for Legacy Parkway is shown as 60 feet wide. This
right -of -way width will only allow for a 36 foot wide roadway with
sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. 20 feet of additional right -of-
way (80 feet total) will be required to allow the roadway to be
constructed to the Kennard Street parkway section.
4. 10 feet of additional right -of -way shall be dedicated along the entire
north boundary of the plat for the future widening and expansion of
County Road D. An additional 12 -foot wide strip of right -of -way should
also be dedicated along the south side of this additional right -of -way for
a right turn lane along County Road D at Kennard Street. This additional
12 -foot strip should extend from Kennard Street to a point 5 00 feet west.
5. The plat needs to include the dedication of right -of -way for Southlawn
Drive.
6. Drainage and utility easements should be dedicated over the existing
wetlands and the proposed storm water ponds.
7. The existing right -of -way along the west side of the plat should be
vacated as shown on the preliminary plat.
8. A sidewalk/trail easement needs to be dedicated over the proposed trail
alignment that runs east -west through the middle of the property.
9. The designs for the proposed ponds on the site need to be coordinated
with the overall Storm Water and Wetlands plan prepared for the area by
the City's engineering consultant (SEH). Some of the proposed ponding
areas will be designed, constructed and maintained by the City, while
others will be designed, constructed and maintained by Hartford.
10. The north terminus of Kennard Street at County Road D needs to be
aligned to match existing driveways along the north side of County Road
D. This needs to be coordinated with the City's design for Kennard
Street.
11. The developer should be aware that the proposed driveways to County
Road D for the retail commercial site and/or the furniture store may
become right - in/right -out only accesses in the future when improvements
are constructed along this section of County Road D. Consideration
should be given to the elimination of the furniture store access to County
Road D.
1.2. The trail on the south side of the public park area south of Legacy
Parkway is shown off the fiord property. This trail will need to be
constructed on Hartford property or a separate trail easement will be
required from the adjacent property owner.
13. The combined driveway in the southeast corner of the development for
the restaurant site will require an agreement with the adjacent property
owner. Has this agreement been discussed with the property owner?
39
Engineering Plan Review
Hartford Legacy Village Development
June 25, 2003
Page 3 of 4
14. Access to the for sale townhomes site should be provided from Kennard
Street at the Legacy Parkway roundabout. If desired, an additional
connection to Kennard Street could be provided; however, it should be a
minim of 300 feet south of the roundabout.
15. The driveways along Kennard Street for the park on Outlot I and for the
corporate /commercial site should be aligned.
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
1. A tree survey needs to be completed for the site as identified in the
AUAR.
GRADING PLAN
1. Design calculations need to be submitted detailing the volume of runoff
from the site and the adequacy of the proposed storm sewer system.
Storm sewer design calculations should be submitted for a 10 -year
design storm. Ponding calculations should be submitted for 10 -year and
100 -year events.
2. The proposed grading plan needs to be coordinated with the City's
design/profile for Kennard Street.
3. The developer must obtain the necessary RWMWD approvals and
permits and a NPDES construction permit.
4. The grading plan shows impacts to the existing wetland south of County
Road D (Wetland F) . The City's Storm Water and Wetland Plan does
not include impacts to this wetland. Impacts to this wetland should
either be avoided, or the impacts and mitigation need to be included in
the overall wetland permit.
5. The grading plan should show the proposed locations for the installation
of silt fence and the other erosion control measures.
UTILITY PLAN
1. It is assumed that all watermwn, sanitary sewer and storm sewer
improvements shown on the Utility Plan outside of the Kennard Street
right -of -way are private facilities.
2. The design for the proposed sanitary sewer improvements needs to be
coordinated with the City's proposed sanitary sewer improvements along
Kennard Street. The City will provide sanitary sewer stubs as needed.
3. The design for the proposed watermain improvements needs to be
coordinated with the City's proposed watermam improvements along
Kennard Street. The City will provide watermain stubs as needed.
40
Engineering Plan Review
Hartford Legacy Village Development
June 25, 2003
Page 4 of 4
4. Design calculations should be submitted detailing the adequacy of the
proposed water main system to serve the service and fire flow needs of
the development. Per the AUAR, the watermain system improvements
also need to be reviewed by the St. Paul Regional Water Services
(SPRWS).
Please let me know if you have any questions or you need any additional
information. I can be reached at (651) 643 -0406 or by e -mail at
jon.homkkm
ley -barn. com
- -�
Copy: Phil Carlson/DSU
File 160500001.3.004
41
LEGACY VILLAGE AT MAPLEWOOD
FINAL AUAR COMMENTS/REQUIItEMENTS
Plan Review Comments
Regent at Maplewood Senior Housing Community and Rental Townhomes
June 25, 2003
The following comments /requirements were included as a part of the Final AUAR for the Legacy
Village at Maplewood development. Comments /requirements highlighted in bold print need to be
addressed as a part of future reviews /approvals for the development. The comments /requirements
are listed based upon the AUAR section in which they appeared.
60 , DESCRIPTION
INFRASTRUCTURE
Roadways
One of the recommended improvements in the 2001 Traffic Study was the reconnection of
County Road D (CR D) to TH 61 {just west of the AUAR study area). Under existing
conditions, CR D is disjointed between TH 61 and white Bear Avenue at the railroad
crossing located west of Hazelwood Avenue. As a result, traffic from the Maplewood
Mall area cannot access TII 61 via CR D. The recommended reconnection of CR D
would reestablish CR D as a through street between TH 61 and V`J'hite Bear Avenue and
locate the TH 61 /CR D intersection south of the I -694 South Ramp. Concurrent with
the Legacy village AUAR development, the CR D roadway will be reconnected.
In addition to the planned reconnection of CR D. -Kennard Street will need to be
extended north to CR D, to provide access to the southern portion of the study area.
The AUAR, study area includes the approximately. 0.5 -acre area required to extend
Kennard Street from its existing northern terminus to the proposed development area.
Sanitary Sewer
Municipal sanitary sewer currently serves the study area, although not all existing parcels
are connected to the system. Connections to the existing municipal sanitary sewer
lines located along CR D, Hazelwood Avenue and Southlawn Drive will be necessary
for development of the AUAR study area.
42
Water Supply
The study area is served by municipal water, although not all existing parcels are
connected to the system. Development of the study area will require connection of all
new development to the public water supply. Water supply lines are located north,
west and east of the study area along the existing CR D (12 -inch line), Hazelwood Avenue
(12 -inch line) and Southlawn Drive (8 -inch line). Water service is provided by St. Paul
Regional Water System (SPRWS). The City of Maplewood had previously conducted
a study in cooperation with SPRWS that identi fied the need to install a 12 -inch
regional trunk water line along CR D from TH 61 to connect to the existing system
at Hazelwood Avenue. This line will be installed within five years from start of
development in the AUAR area.
Early coordination with SPRWS for the AUAR identified that the capacity of the existing
system would likely be adequate to handle the projected demand from the study area.
Further review of proposed development plans will be required by SPRWS during
site plan review to confirm actual demand of proposed land uses and to ensure
conformance of the proposed development water supply system to SPRWS system
requirements.
Storm Water
The AUAR development scenario will increase the amount of impervious surface area
with the addition of buildings, roadways and other paved surfaces, resulting in lower
infiltration rates compared to existing conditions. Future development will be required
to provide storm water treatment measures to adequately convey, detain and treat
the additional runoff within the development area in accordance with the City of
Maplewood and Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD)
requirements, including the requirement for post - development discharges to remain
at or below existing discharge rates. No new storm sewer system infrastructure would
be required outside the development area.
Other Utilities
Overhead electrical and telecommunication lines and an underground pipeline traverse the
study area from east to west. The proposed development will be configured to avoid
impacting these utilities. Structures will be sited to avoid utility impacts and to meet
City setbacks' standards (100 -foot minimum). for the pipeline.
8. PERMITS AND APPROVALS REQUIRED
The following permit requirements were identified in the AUAR:
43
TABLE 3
REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS
Unit of Government
Permit or Approval
City of Maplewood
Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Preliminary and
Final Plat Approval; Planned Unit Development
(PUD) Approval; . Building Permits; Community
Design Review Board Review and Approval of
building plans; Grading Plan and Permit (with
grading/erosion escrow); Land Disturbance and
.Erosion Control Plan Review and Permit; Site Plan
Review and Approval; Stone Water and Water Quality
Plan Review and Approval; Regional Storm , Water
Management and Wetland Mitigation Plan; Sanitary
Sewer Service and System Permits; Storm Sewer System
Utility Permits; Tree Plan Review and Approval (with a
tree re- establi shment escrow); Approval of Tax.
Abatement Plan.
Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed
Storm Water and Water Quality Plan Review and
District (RWMWD)
Approval; Minnesota Wetland - Conservation Act
Permit, if required.
Metropolitan Council Environmental
Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
Services
St. Paul Regional Water System
� Y
Water System Extension and Connection Review
and Approval
1 fum esota Pollution Control Agency
NPDES Construction Permit, Sanitary Sewer
Extension Permit
Minnesota Department of Health .
Approval for Water /Sewer Plans; Approval of well
sealing records
Army Corps of Engineers
Section 404 Permit, if required.
Amoco oil Company
Permit for grading near underground pipeline
9. LAND USE
Potential Environmental Hazards
As identified previously, a Phase I ESA was completed for the study area. The results of
the ESA revealed no indications of recognized environmental hazards or contamination
releases in the study area.
44
Since the residence located in the center of Sub -Area 1 is not serviced by city water
and sanitary, it is presumed that an existing private well and septic system are
present on the site and will need to be located and sealed in accordance with state
and local regulatory requirements. No wells were discovered in Sub -Area 2 during a
search of the county well survey; however, based on information received during the
Draft AUAR comment period, a field survey of properties in Sub -Area 2 will be
conducted prior to site grading. If wells are located, proper protection will be
implemented in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health requirements or
the wells will be sealed in accordance with state and local regulatory requirements.
As noted in Item 6, an underground petroleum pipeline traverses the AUAR study area but
the development will be configured to avoid impacts to the pipeline. A Contingency
Plan will be submitted to the City identifying measures to handle any contaminated
soils related to pipeline leakage. This plan must be approved prior to the issuance of
the grading permit.
10. COVER TYPES
Protection Areas
The City of Maplewood has ordinances and policies promoting protection of large trees
and wetland buffer areas. Development plans submitted for City approval will be
reviewed relative to these ordinances, and developer and City staff will need to work
together to identify protection measures and /or plan features to preserve existing
cover types to the extent possible while still achieving the City's planned
Business /Commercial land uses. For example, the developer for Sub -Area 1 has
indicated that existing trees will be evaluated by an urban forester to identify
important specimens that should be preserved and /or existing trees that could be
relocated within the development, using a tree spade. City staff will review the tree
preservation and relocation plan and plans for tree replacement for conformance to
the City's tree ordinance. City staff will also be requesting that the developer
provide a description of bow vegetation removed from the site will be disposed of.
Similarly, City and watershed district regulations require maintenance of a
minimum width of natural vegetation buffer around all wetlands. This buffer area
promotes protection of natural vegetative cover as part of site development plans.
11. FISH, WILDLIFE, AND ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE RESOURCES
Since the wetlands and surrounding vegetation at the southeast corner of the AUAR study
area provide habitat similar to that preferred by Blanding's turtles, the DNB's list of
recommendations for avoiding and minimizing impacts to Blanding's turtles and their
habitat was reviewed for applicability to the AUAR study area. The following
45
recommendations will be implemented during planning/construction in the
southeast portion of the study area, where feasible:
1) Placement of silt fencing around construction areas to keep turtles out of
construction areas in the spring.
2) Notifying contractors of the possibility of threatened turtles in the area and
instructions on how to identify them and to avoid harm to turtles if they are
spotted.
3) Minimization of impacts to open water wetlands in the area.
4) Preservation of un -mowed upland buffer around wetlands in the area.
12. PHYSICAL IMPACTS ON WATER RESOURCES
To comply with requirements of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and of
the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD), the Local Governmental
Unit (LGU) responsible for implementing WCA regulations, all wetland impacts will have
to be offset by creating mitigation at a 2:1 ratio (two acres of mitigation for each acre of
impacted area). A detailed mitigation plan would need to be developed as the site
plans are developed. Wetland mitigation can be accomplished through a combination of
new (replacement) wetland area and by providing public value credit areas within the
AUAR development area. The existing wetlands located at the south - central portion of
the site (Wetlands C and D) could be enlarged to create new wetland area for mitigation.
If mitigation occurs in this area, the City of Maplewood and RVVMWD have suggested
that these two wetlands be left separate, to maintain the existing two -cell water drainage
pattern.
Permits will be required from the Army Corps of Engineers and the RWMWD for
wetland alterations. As part of the permit approval process,- a final mitigation plan
will have to be submitted to •these agencies 'documenting proposed "Wetland impacts
and detailed mitigation.
The Wetland Protection ordinance of the City of Maplewood and the
RWMWD's 1997 Watershed Management Plan each require buffers of undisturbed
area to be left around existing wetlands. The required average and minimum widths of
the buffers vary depending upon classification of the wetland. Some activities such as
trails are permitted in. the buffers if additional width is added to the overall buffer to
mitigate for the trail impact. Table 5 shows the required average and mum buffer
widths for each wetland as specified by the watershed District and City.
46
TABLE 5
REQUIRED WETLAND BUFFERS
Table 5 reflects a recent wetland classification modification. During a field reconnaissance
for this study, Wetland E was noted to have characteristics more similar to the Watershed
District's Manage Class 1 or 2, instead of the "Protect" classification listed in the
R 's 1997 Watershed Management Plan After a field reconnaissance to examine
Wetland E, the Watershed District agreed With the characterization of the wetland
Warranting less than a "Protect" classification, and subsequently changed their
classification of this wetland to "Manage 1. During development plan submittals, the
City may consider reclassification of this wetland from Class 1 to Class 3 to match
the Watershed District's classification.
The wetland buffer requirements will need to be met by the proposed development
for the wetlands that will not be filled. Wetlands A and B do not appear in Watershed
District's 1997 Watershed Management Plan, and. so are considered to be in the "Utilize"
category, which has no buffer requirement, but does require 2:1 mitigation by type and
location.
A wetland mitigation plan will be developed and submitted to the City, the
RWMWD and the appropriate state and federal wetland regulatory agencies for
47
City of Maplewood Wetland
Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed
Protection Ordinance
District's 1997 Watershed Management Plan
Wetland
Buffer
Name
Classification
Requirement
Classification
Buffer Re uirement
Not listed
Wetland A
N/A
Not listed
N/A
Not listed
Wetland B
N/A
Not listed
NIA
50 foot avg.;
25 foot min.
Manage -1 (Medium)
10 ft, building
(Kohlman Creek
50 foot avg.; 25 foot
Wetland C
Class 3
setback
Subwatershed)
min.
50 foot avg.;
25 foot min.
Manage- 1(Medium)
10 A. building
(Kohlman Creek
50 foot avg.; 25 foot
Wetland D
Class 3
setback
Subwatershed)
min.
50 foot avg.;
25 foot min.
Manage -1 (Medium)
10 ft. building
(Willow Creek
50 foot avg, 10 foot
Wetland E
Class 3
setback
Subwatershed)
min.
25 foot avg.;
Manage -2 (Low)
20 foot min.; 10 ff.
(Willow Creek
25 foot avg.;. 10 foot
Wetland F
Class 4
building setback
Subwatershed)
rain.
Table 5 reflects a recent wetland classification modification. During a field reconnaissance
for this study, Wetland E was noted to have characteristics more similar to the Watershed
District's Manage Class 1 or 2, instead of the "Protect" classification listed in the
R 's 1997 Watershed Management Plan After a field reconnaissance to examine
Wetland E, the Watershed District agreed With the characterization of the wetland
Warranting less than a "Protect" classification, and subsequently changed their
classification of this wetland to "Manage 1. During development plan submittals, the
City may consider reclassification of this wetland from Class 1 to Class 3 to match
the Watershed District's classification.
The wetland buffer requirements will need to be met by the proposed development
for the wetlands that will not be filled. Wetlands A and B do not appear in Watershed
District's 1997 Watershed Management Plan, and. so are considered to be in the "Utilize"
category, which has no buffer requirement, but does require 2:1 mitigation by type and
location.
A wetland mitigation plan will be developed and submitted to the City, the
RWMWD and the appropriate state and federal wetland regulatory agencies for
47
approval prior to any impacts. The City and the developer are also working
together on preparation of a Regional Storm Water Management Plan and wetland
Mitigation Plan for the ALTAR area. The City will be responsible for implementing
the regional plan through the project approvals and development review process.
Full mitigation concurrent with project construction, including a performance
guarantee, will be a condition of the City's preliminary plat and PUD approval.
13. WATER USE
As referenced in Item 9, since the residence in the center of Sub -Area 1 is not serviced by
city water and sanitary, it is presumed that a private well and septic system are present on
the site and. will need to be located. Although no wells were discovered on the county
well survey for Sub -Area .2, based on comments received. during the Draft ALTAR
comment period, a field survey of properties in Sub -Area 2 will be conducted prior
to site grading.. All wells will be sealed in accordance with state and local regulatory
requirements.
Existing water lines are located north, west and east of the study area along the existing
CR D (12 -inch line), Hazelwood Avenue (12 -inch line) and Southlawn Drive (eight inch
line). Water is provided by St. Paul Regional Water System (SPRWS) for the AUAR
study area. The City of Maplewood had previously conducted a study in cooperation
with SPRWS that identified the need to install a 12 -inch water line along CR D from
TH bl to the existing system at Hazelwood Avenue to complete the area trunk
system. This line will be installed within five years from the start of development in
the AUAR area.
Early coordination with SPRWS indicated that the existing system would likely have the
capacity to handle the additional demands from Legacy Village. Further coordination
with SPRWS will be required during site plan review to make certain that the
specific land uses proposed - in development plans, including irrigation use, can be
accommodated by the existing system.
16. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
While it is premature to determine the detailed earthmoving requirements for the future
development, the results of the Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report completed for
the study area.- in April 2002, recommend that the topsoil and soft alluvial soils within. the
study area be removed prior to construction of the buildings. More removal of existing
soils and placement of engineered soils may be required in areas near wetlands. A
detailed site grading plan will be required as part of the plan submittals for City
approval of specific development proposals in the AUAR area. Also, a detailed
erosion control mitigation plan will be prepared and approved prior to the City's
issuance of site grading permits.
\
Preparation of preliminary site development plans will include consultation with an
urban forester to identify important specimens that should be preserved and /or
existing trees that could be relocated within the development, using a tree spade.
The details of the transplanting as well as an overall tree/landscape plan will be
completed and reviewed by City staff for conformance to the City's tree ordinance
as part of the preliminary and final site review. Similarly, City and watershed
district regulations require maintenance of a minimum width of natural vegetation
buffer around all wetlands. This buffer area promotes protection of natural vegetative
cover to minimize erosion and sedimentation as part of site development plans.
The potential for erosion of soils exposed during development of the AUAR study
area will be minimized by using Best Management Practices (BMPs) during and
after construction. Examples of possible BMPs include:
• Installation of erosion control measures prior to grading operations and maintaining
them until all areas disturbed have been restored.
• Construction of detention ponds prior to site mass grading, to contain construction -
related runoff/sediment.
• Sweeping streets as necessary where construction sediment has been deposited.
• Amer construction, paving or vegetating all disturbed areas to eliminate exposed soil
surfaces.
• Delaying removal of erosion control measures until all disturbed areas have been
stabilized.
Specific erosion control practices will be identified in final grading and construction
plans for each proposed development project as required by the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NIPDES) permit the City of Maplewood and the
RWMWD's erosion /sedimentation control standards.
17. WATER QUALITY- SURFACE WATER RUNOFF
Mitigation
City and RVQv1WD regulations establish the standard for surface water conveyance,
detention and mitigation for any development proposed in the AUAR study area.
Mitigation requirements include:
• Maintaining discharge rates at or below current levels.
• Pre - treatment of runoff prior to discharge to wetlands, in accordance with wetland
classification requirements.
• Conformance to NURP standards.
49
City and RVVMWD guidelines also promote use of additional infiltration facilities (such as
rain gardens) in new development areas, where feasible, to decrease runoff volumes and
increase groundwater recharge.
The City of Maplewood in cooperation with the developer is preparing a Regional Storm
Water Management and Wetland Mitigation Plan. The City will be the responsible
party for implementing the regional plan through project approvals and the
development review process. As development plans are refined, developer and
City/RWMWD staff will work together to refine storm water facilities on the
development site, including sizing and location of detention /treatment ponds and
identification of potential additional infiltration areas. This plan will include a
detailed storm water analysis for water quality discharges, including demonstration
of conformance to City water treatment standards for total system discharges. The
storm water plan will also review wetland `bounce' effects from storm water
discharges as well as assessment of potential storm water impacts on wetland
quality.
18. WATER QUALITY — WASTEWATER
The City of Maplewood met with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES)
staff during the Draft AUAR 30 -Day comment period to review the estimated flows for
the AUAR development. Since the distribution of the Draft AUAR, it was determined
that the flow estimate presented in the Draft AUAR was conservative (high) and therefore,
it was recalculated based on actual flow data from similar land uses. The revised flow
estimates show that the estimated sanitary sewer flows from the proposed AUAR
development are within. the flow allocated to the AUAR land area in the Sanitary Sewer
Comprehensive Plan. Review of the 2000 City of Maplewood Sanitary Sewer
Comprehensive Plan (2000 Plan) allocations for sanitary sewer Sub -Areas 22 and 23 (that
include the AUAR study area) identified an error in the 2020 projection calculated in the
2000 plan for these sub - areas. This error resulted in the projections in the 2000 Plan being
lower than those in the previous, 1987, sanitary sewer plan. The 2000 projections would
result. inadequate interceptor allocation to accommodate the flows from the proposed
AUAR development (even though there is adequate capacity allocated previously in the
1987 Plan). This error was discussed with MCES staff, and the City is revising the
2004 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan to correct the error. The revised 2000
Plan is slated for completion in April or May 2003.
20. SOLID WASTES; HAZARDOUS WASTES; STORAGE TANKS
Solid waste resulting from demolition and grading (including existing structures
And tree/vegetation waste) will be minimized and properly recycled or disposed of
in compliance with state and local requirements. Existing structures will be
inspected for potentially hazardous materials (e.g. existing fuel storage tanks and/or
the presence of asbestos - containing construction materials), and if hazardous
materials are identified, removal and disposal will be conducted in conformance
50
with state regulatory requirements. Also, an underground petroleum pipeline
traverses the AUAR study area and a Contingency Plan will be submitted to the
City identifying measures to handle any contaminated soils related to pipeline
leakage. This plan must be approved prior to the issuance of the grading permit.
A Phase I ESA prepared for the study area did not identify the presence of any existing
above or underground tanks in the study area. The proposed development may include
fuel storage above or underground for back up heating systems as well as for intermittent
heating systems. No other above or underground storage tanks are anticipated for
development within the study area. Any future fuel storage tanks would be installed
and monitored in accordance with MPCA requirements.
24. DUST, ODORS AND NOISE
Odors & Dust During Construction
The proposed project will not generate any odors during construction. Dust normal to
construction will occur as a result of this project. Dust minimization measures to be
implemented will be identified in the grading plan submitted to the City prior to
construction. Dust generated during construction will be minimized through
standard dust control measures such as watering. After construction is complete, dust
levels are anticipated to be minimal because all soil surfaces will be in permanent cover
(i.e., pavement or grassed areas).
Construction Noise
The actual noise levels that may be experienced near a construction zone depend on:
• The distance between the construction equipment and the receiver.
• The type of equipment in use.
• The percentage of the. time the equipment attains the peak level.
• Noise control features incorporated into the equipment.
Construction noise will be limited to daytime hours (7-.00 a.m. -7;00 p.m. Monday
through Saturday) in accordance with City of Maplewood ordinances.
Construction equipment will be fitted with mufflers, which will be maintained
during the construction process.
Traffic Noise
The relatively small increase in traffic resulting from the construction of this development
will not perceptibly change noise levels in the project area. The dominant source of noise
along the northern part of the development is traffic on I -694 that will not be affected by
the project. The local streets within the proposed development are exempt from state
standards; therefore on- street mitigation. is not proposed as part of this project.
51
However, since existing and future noise levels in the vicinity of the proposed
development are relatively high, the proposed residential units will be designed to
minimize noise impacts by providing climate - controlled units, increasing wall
insulation and by providing outside common areas within the building courtyards,
rather than on the street side of the units. These elements would decrease the
residents' exposure to neighborhood traffic noise.
25. SENSITIVE RESOURCES
The Bruce Vento Regional Trail is located outside of the study area to the west and
generally travels north - south. The City Comprehensive Plan indicates a planned east -west
trail (along - CR.- D) that would connect the Maplewood Mall area with the Bruce Vento
Regional Trail. No other trails or parks are . immediately adjacent to the study area.
New development within the study area will include a connection to- the new trail
along CR D and an internal network. of trails, providing a link to the wetlands in the
southeastern portion of the study area.
26. VISUAL IMPACTS
The impacts from proposed commercial land uses on the proposed residential land
uses has been considered and. measures such as "downcast" or directed lighting will
be used to mitigate as well as other measures consistent with the City of Maplewood
lighting ordinance.
27. COMPATIBILITY WITH PLANS
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Legacy site for Business /Commercial
development. It recognizes that Commercial development today calls for greater
flexibility. The City has enacted a policy to "Use Planned Unit Developments whenever
practical" in both Commercial and Residential areas.
The Comprehensive Plan generally calls for undeveloped land where the zoning is not yet
consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to remain in holding areas:
"Holding Areas ... It has not been the policy of the City to change
the zoning of a property until a specific development request is
approved by the City Council. . . . Maplewood will update the
zoning . and/or the land use plan designations when a development is
proposed and approved by the City Council" (Plan p. 26)
The Legacy AUAR area is in such a City designated "Holding Area." (Plan p. 27) It is
designated within a Farm Residential Zoning District, which generally provides for low -
density single - family residential development (10, 000 square -foot lots), but this land use is
not consistent with the Business /Commercial designation in the Land Use Plan. This
52-
zoning designation would need to be revised, consistent with the `Holding Area'
concept in the City's Plan, once development is proposed for the Legacy area. The
Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Action element notes that rezonings should be allowed,
consistent with the Land Use Plan.
The rezoning is supported by the Comprehensive Plan. The Legacy site is within the
Hazelwood planning neighborhood. In Hazelwood, the 270 remaining undeveloped acres
are planned to be developed with a mix of multi - family residential (R3), single - family
residential (R1) manufacturing and commercial/office uses. Commercial/office is planned
to predominate; it is planned for 194 of the 270 acres (72 percent). (Plan p. 36)
Phase one of the Legacy development is proposed- to occur following approval of a
Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD allows approval of departures from the
strict application of regulations, including the restriction of one principal building per lot,
for projects which are superior to development allowed without departure from
restrictions. City Code § 36-438. Following approval of a PUD, Legacy Village will
conform with the zoning and the Comprehensive Plan.
280 IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES
The existing public water, sanitary sewer and storm water system have been reviewed for
the ability to accommodate the needs of the worst -case development scenario studied in
this AUAR. Lateral extensions to the existing public systems along CR D, Hazelwood
Avenue and Southlawn Drive will be necessary for the proposed development. * The
existing City systems have the capacity to accommodate the new developments needs.
Early coordination with SPRWS and MCES indicated their systems have adequate
capacity to accommodate the new development; however, there will be further
coordination with these agencies during site plan review.
The proposed AUAR land uses can be configured to accommodate any of the City's plans
for reconstruction/reconnection of CR D. Kennard Street will be extended north from
its- existing terminus as -part of the development to connect with
reconstructed /reconnected CR D. Other streets within the AUAR study area will be
private driveways and roads internal to the development, not public streets.
Increased fire and police protection will need to be provided to the area with the proposed
expansion. City police staff have determined that the proposed development will likely
require 2 police officers based upon 1.5 officers per 1,000 people. The fire department
has estimated a need for 8 new firefighters /paramedics throughout the City, of which
2 may need to be dedicated to the AUAR development area. Additional study of
financial commitment of the development's related tax base toward police and fire
protection will occur as part of the PUD and Tax Abatement hearings for the
proposed development. Based on the current school system enrollment, no substantial
impacts are anticipated with the addition of residential land use associated with the
planned site development.
53
Attachment 9
TO: Tom Ekstr , As "stG
FROM: Bruce K. Andersen, i
DATE: June 25, 2003
MEMORA
evelopment Director
r df Fdrks land Recreation
SUBJECT: Legacy Village Park Requirements
The purpose of this memorandum is to respond to your comments dated June 12 regarding the
Legacy Village proposal: I have spoken with Patrick Sarver regarding the park dedication .
requirements. for Legacy Village and I have indicated to h.im that the city's position is that the park
dedication be based on the attached 2003 park dedication rates.
The final numbers are somewhat fluid, but based on the last plan l have received dated June 9, the
park dedication fees would be as outlined in Addendum A. The total is $830,900.
The city is not interested in accepting land in lieu of P.A.C. charges. The city does not believe the
2.25 -acre park has the same land value as adjacent commercial /residential land. The _property is
located under the power lines and will not experience the increase in land value due to development.
The proposed park will primarily benefit the developer and ultimately the leasers and renters. It is in
effect a marketing tool for Hartford Development. We do believe and agree there is some benefit to
the city from the park. This value needs to be negotiated and furthermore, the city may utilize tax
abatement dollars as part of the solution. The bottom line is that the city's stance is to request the
developer for cash in lieu of land dedication as calculated in Addendum A.
We have discussed the feasibility of working in cooperation with the developer to construct a water
park which would benefit both the city and the development. Should the water park concept be
pursued, the actual cost of construction of the water park would be deducted on a dollar - for - dollar
basis from the park dedication fees. .
All park dedication fee requirements will be met by the P.A.C. fees and there will not be any additional
park dedication requirements.
The city does not propose to construct any park improvements or amenities throughout the site
including trails, ponds or parking lots. It will be the responsibility of the developer to construct and
improve all identified public parks, ponds, and trails within the proposed development.
The neighborhood park that serves this site is Hazelwood Park, which is located four blocks to the
south. _
I have included a copy of a memo dated March 17 which has similar information, although the figures
are different based on numbers that were available at that time.
Should you have any questions on this issue, please contact me directly at ext. 4573.
kdVegacyvillageZmem
Enclosure
C: Richard Fursman, City Manager
Patrick Kelly, City Attorney
Melinda Coleman, Asst City Manager
Chuck Ahl, Director of Public Works
Dennis Peck, Sr. Engineering Tech.
Patrick Sarver, Hartford Development
-54
LEGACY AT MAPLEWOOD
PROJECTED PARK ALLOCATION FEES /CREDITS 6125/03
CCCC
AREA (Ac.)
UNITS
POP./UNIT
RENTAL TOWNHOME (WEST)
12.61
96
1 br 2 br
2.7
1 br 2 br
PAC RATE 'OT. PAC RATIRKT RAT
TOTAL
RENTAL TOWNHOME (EAST)
7.65
102
2.7
$
$
450 $ 855
450 $ 855
$ 4 200
,
$ 45,900
SENIOR FACILITY
2.86
120
74 46
1.1 2.0
$
450
78 030
FOR -SALE TOWNHOMES
19.77
197
1.9
$
450 $ 1
$ 88,650
MULTI- FAMILY
4.22
50
1.9
$
450 $ 855
22 500
CORPORATE
6.46.
9% $ 8
202 606
COMMERCIAL/RETAIL (SOUTH)
4.85
9 %
9% $ S
$ � 5 z,112
COMMERCIAL /RETAIL (NORTH)
6.31
$ 8
$ 197,902
$ 830,900
LAND CREDITS
Ln
AREA Ac.
AREA (sf )
$ /sf
TOTAL
L PARK W/ WATER PLAY
2.25
98010
$
3.07
$
300 891
PARK W /PATH UPLAND AREA
0.75
32670
$
3,07
$
9
100,297
$
401,188
REMAINING PARK FEES'
FEE
APPLIED CREDIT 1EMAINING FEE
RENTAL TOWNHOME (WEST)
$
43
$
43
$
-
RENTAL TOWNHOME (EAST)
$
'45
$
45
$
..
SENIOR FACILITY
$
78
$
78
$
-
FOR -SALE TOWNHOMES
$
88
$
88
$
-
MULTI - FAMILY
$
22
$
22
$
-
CORPORATE
$
202
$
-
$
202
COMMERCIAL /RETAIL (SOUTH)
$
152,112
$
-
$
152,112
COMMERCIALlRETAIL (NORTH)
$
197
$
122
$
74 994
TOTALS
$
830
$
401
$
429
* Credited park fees will be commuted by
private agreement
to each of the related sub - e
d velopers.
Rema
Remaining park fees shall be paid at the
i
time of
individual site development by the assigned sub - developer.
_
=GACY VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD
ET ACRES AVAILABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT
STIMATED VALUE: RIGHT OF WAY siarzc
ACRES
WETLAND
.1.76-
NW WETLAND
4.66
PARK N WETLAND
2.39
PARK S WETLAND
8.81
TOTAL
ADDITIONAL RlW
0.58
HAZELWOOD
1.58
CR D
,`.._.3.00
KENNARD-
1.66
EAST-WEST ST.
6.82
TOTAL
PARK
3.04
UPLAND POND
2.25
PARK
5.29
TOTAL
SUMMARY
• 85.33
PURCHASE TOTAL ACRES
-3.34
EXIST R/W
-8.81
EXIST WETLANDS
-6.82
ADDITIONAL R/W
-5.29
PARK ACRES
61.07
DEVELOPABLE ACRES
2
D EVE LO PAB LE SQUARE FEET
VALUE OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY
3.07
LAND ACQUISITION AVERAGE COST PER SQUARE FOOT
6.82
TOTAL ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY -ACRES
297
TOTAL ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY- SQUARE FEET
$912,033
VALUE: TOTAL ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY
56
2003 P.A.C. RATES
P 2003 Rates Tnta!
Single Dwelling
3.4
$450
$1
Double Dwelling
5.4
$450
$2,430
Mobile Home
2.5
$450
$1
Townhouse
2.7
$450
$1,215
Regarding P.A.C. fees. for apartment complex:
If 3 -4 units /building - 2.7 persons X rate X number of units
If 5 units[building - 1.9 persons X rate X number of units
If elderly apartments:
1 bedroom - 1:1 persons X rate X number of units
2 bedroom - 2.0 persons X rate X number of units
The commerciallindustrial rate is 9% of the market value of the property.
57
MEM
TO: Tom Ekstrand, Assistant Community Development Director
FROM." Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation
DATE: March 17, 2003
SUBJECT: Legacy Village of Maplewood
l have had the opportunity to review the project review form dated March 7 2003 for Legacy Villa
g y g e of
Maplewood. I have reviewed the . project from a parks and recreation pers ective includin
g
neighborhood park access, trail location, open space and park dedication fees.
This project will be served by two major trail amenities, the first being the Bruce Vento Trail to e e
A � h east
which can be accessed ssed off of Beam Avenue, and the second being th-e integration.or the Highline Trail
along County Road D, which will ultimately connect with .the. Bruce Vento Trail which ties into the
Gateway Trail as well.
The neighborhood parks for this development are Hazelwood Park located t d approximately six blocks to
the south on Hazelwood Avenue, with a trail access coming up Hazelwood Avenue as well as off of
Beam Avenue adjacent to the Maplewood Library. The area is further served with city-acquired o e
p n
space at the intersection of Hazelwood Avenue and Beam Avenue.
I have enclosed a copy of the 2003 park dedication rates. .1 also forwarded under separate cover a
copy of the park dedication fees to Patrick Sarver, ASL A. for Hartford Development. The city will be
P Y
assessing park dedication fees at the enclosed rates for the Legacy 'Village project.
- P �
The proposed open space and /or ponding area does not meet the ci 's ark dedicat tY P ton requirements
and no credit or partial credit will be provided, as the ponding space is req uired through h the PUD and
4 9
does not meet the city's park dedication intent- or requirement for dedicated land.
I have had discussions with Hartford Development regarding p otential creati
9 P on of a water splash park
within the development. I be 'f ieve that this would be a benefit to both the development and to the
p city
.and it could serve as one-for-one credit to meet the',park dedication fee. Estimated cost - of the splash
P h
park (see enclosed information) is estimated at $500,'000. Discussions are extremely preliminary a
y P ry t
this point, but the city would potentially serve as the operator or manager of the splash a
9 p park. Once the
developer completes the project, it would be deeded to the city as partial fulfillment of the ar k
dedication requirements.
P
The following park dedication fees are based on III under Comprehensive
submittal:
P nsrve Plan of the .Legacy Village
a. 318 townhomes at $1215 = $386
b. 200 row home units at $1215 = $243
c. 100 multi- family units at 1.9 density at $450 = $85,500
d. 127 senior resident units (2 persons at $450 at 84.7 units = $76 and 1.1 ersons at $450 at
42.3 units = $20,938)*
p
e. 9.1 acres of retail for restaurants at $8 /square foot at 9% = $285
f. 9.3 acres of commercial' building. at $8 /.square foot at 9% _ $291 678 #*
"Staff estimated the breakdown of 1 and 2 bedroom units
'r*'Staf f estimated the value of land; confirmation of developer would be required.
M
Stan recognizes that the proposed f i rst buildings in the southwest 19.8 -acr r'
portion will pr e aver
52% of that acreage in open s-pace but the proposed open space' does not meet the intent. Or
r lquirarn nts of park dedication flees.
Should you have 'any questions regarding my comments, lease contact me dir (e:' _ 4� 73P r ectfy at 1 � � 7�-
kdl egacyvillage
c: f;ichard Fursmari, city Manager
Melinda Coleman, Asst. City Manager
Chuck rah[, Public Works Director
Jim Elias, Sr. Engineering Tech.
59
r"
COUNTY ROAD 0
I. III!' 11 ! II11 ML TIVE
= 11 1 ,t ! F CI_= OM R tAE POND j yr.: - AI� 1 �\ �"
/ // i - � • • .., : . •:�:F;= I �� - ' 1 111' 11 ' I I I I �
_+►�a►�R \ ' \ V�►!.� - I r� FURNITURE I
\ Izs nvcno gun ro,aucH <,'\ _ 1 c STORE I
��.�� '� NTA _ ? + a X44 + 080 SF
4.02 AC.
ii �' _ - li 111IIi li I
\ ', 137 PK� SP
i% �� 1 �' " E i I I I KG SP P I
• � � 7. � AC. ; + rf 0 - S � �
I
L l �
I � 1
2.34 AC. 1 II 11 I1U�; -
-• • - - - ---+ - - _. - - _ .._.._.._. _._-- •--•- --• ._._...- -- I y _.' L _l'rsrn � rr� si.ii�r-r.+3 -rd� r�rs: ••)
�
/ /� I •- -- -•• —• - --• -• -- __.. —._ _.._ ._... -. _-- .- . --.... ..._. -... _ •_ 111 1 +T •-. = _'. _ _ _.._... -. .. .. 1 - --
T"� R` ?�t
l Eau
1 r 1 - III 111 ► II +1 1 - POND i1 POND
OND ! rVf�LJ 1 F�EID ._ �JL.�;;, \': SrXC�EN (11 I 11 ;I t ..t,• ` I , _ �JL�1 ► - FIELD - IeQ�:Ito! t STRUGTUFTE`i r�HCI � 1" - I�IIY � 1 + 1 i G ' uu GI E: , ' ,�11! t i
RE • � AREA ! STRUCTURE _ 1 t � � I31<�_ "N
►t+ ET L I
o A ' i •� a�a. 1
• 11C.O1111!' � i� •; .
t x1f w SPACti
uj
I t
z I Q NNW p
I $
its — - -- VVVETLANO e�FER 4 A
FOR SALE A I AVW -I 1.11M.WOT000N
, J
9T�� (W
1 • I
TOWNHOMEB ` � ,� �����-
,1 1 FI i , �n�.,-:h: :3 (: 1 ,� I O
GROSS 19.78 Ac. �` �8'A� •�, t
1 4 ' d/A .
POND • a1 '� O
- t
0.67 Ac. �� UBLIC PARK WITH E$
- _ 1 TRAIL to d
FIA
I - 5�0'AVGrj6'I.uN. �!
I 1 �, +roll Ig•:��I.4�f • • •' � -
^� . ( UMFWN1ERpERATIvt'TRXL + `
J 4
ETi I
' f FILL POND 4000 I
• 0.63 Ac 1
IR
°tDa
BASi . ; I
200 p 100 700 400
1 inch 200 ft.
L at Maplewood PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN Hart Group. hic.
Ma lewo d to June 9 2 2003 Ambilecls/Engineers/Plaunets
P 0 SO 13100 5ingIchec Lmm. EJcn Prhirir- MN 5534.1
Bruce Anderson
From: Tom Ekstrand [Tom.Ekstrand a@ci.Mapiewood.mn.usl
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:41 PM
TO: Bruce K. Anderson (E -mail)
Subject: Legacy Village Park Element
Bruce, would you please prepare some written comments on the proposed park
portion of the Legacy Village proposal. We'd like to have Phil Carlson of
DSU ( our reviewing consultant) include any comments of yours in his report.
Some questions are:
*
Is the park to be dedicated in lieu of PAC charges to be paid?
* Will the dwelling units be charges PAC fees as well as the park
dedication?
* Will the city be doing the park improvements including building those
trail sections and parking lot?
* Will the applicant build these?
* Any other bits of information you can think of that Will be good to know
for the _planning commission and council
Thanks Bruce, This came up today in our morning staff meeting. Could I get
something by mid week next week? I hope this isn't too much of a rush.
PS:
Sorry for the wild goose chase ' about the "curbing" or lack there of at the
farm parking lot. I did try to find the file to answer this first before
bothering you. I still can't find it. Chuck did help me remember the
council action tho.
Thanks, Tom
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti -virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Ver.siopi 6.0.465 / Virus Database: 263 - Release Date: 3/25/2003
61
Attachment 10
85 E. SEVENTH PLACE, SUITE 100
SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 -2887
651-223-3000 FAX: 651-223-3002
SPRINGSTED
Advisors to the Public Sector
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melinda Coleman, Assistant City Manager, Maplewood
Dan Faust, Finance Director, Maplewood
FROM: Paul T. Steinman, Vice President
DATE: July 2, 2003
SUBJECT: Legacy Village of Maplewood Abatement Analysis
The purpose of this memo is to describe and summarize the results of our analysis to determine
the necessary level of assistance required to make the Legacy Village project feasible.
Deal Structure — Legacy Village
The Hartford Group, Inc., the developer, is proposing to purchase approximately 85.33 acres
located west of Maplewood Mall, awned , by the Hajicek's. Of this, the developer is proposing to
develop approximately 61 acres into a mixed use project containing the following components:
• Owner occupied townhomes — 225 units
• Rental Rowhomes — 198 units
• Affordable .apartments — 50 .units
• Assisted living —120 units
• Commercial and retail — approximately 164,000 sf
• Corporate site -- approximately 175,000 sf
The site is projected by the developer to create a total market value upon completion of
$162,175,000. The site has a current (payable 04) taxable market value of $367,200.
Using current tax classification rates and tax capacity rates and subtracting the taxes generated
by the existing market value, we estimate the project, in its first year at full value, will generate
approximately $2,000,000 in annual taxes, the city share being $600,000.
The developer has requested tax abatement in the amount of $5,953,033. The developer has
indicated 3 areas supporting their need for assistance for the project:
• Density buy -down $4
• Special extraordinary amenities $ 994,000
• Value of ROW $ 900
CORPORATE OFFICE: SAINT PAUL, MN • Visit our website at www.s.pringsted.com
IOWA • KANSAS • MINNESOTA • VIRGINIA • WASHINGTON, DC • WISCONSIN
62
City of Maplewood
Legacy Village Abatement Analysis
Page 2
Springsted and City staff have met with the developer several times over the past months and
the parties concur on a refined abatement request of $3,800,000. The abatement amount was
refined in the following manner:
1. $2,600,000 - density buy -down
The developer has reduced the proposed density of the project, due in part to
Council and Planning Commission comments, from 17 units per acre to 11. This is a
total unit reduction from 865 to 584, or 271 units. The developer has indicated that
each unit reduction is lost potential earnings from this project in the amount of
approximately 15,000 per unit, for a total lost income of about $4 million. Developer
profit per unit can vary significantly in the current market but for owner occupied and
rental products, the range can be as low as $7,000 to a high of $17,000 per unit.
There are many variables affecting this profit number. Size of project, location,
transportation, local amenities, and design are just a few examples.
2. $300,000 — upgrade from base to parkway design for Kennard
The cost estimate far the base design of Kennard is $2,531,200 vs. the parkway cost
estimate of $2,831,200.
3. $900,000 — value of ROW
Generally in a project involving new road construction and ROW acquisition, the City
doesn't pay for the ROW. However, due to the fairly large amount of land required,
about 6.8 acres, the developer is requesting that the City purchase the ROW. The
proposed sale price is equal to the developer's developable land acquisition costs of
$3.07 per square foot.
Using a market value inflation factor of 3% per year, it is estimated to take approximately 9
years of abatement (2006 — 2014) to generate a present value subsidy of $3.8 million. To
provide this subsidy will consume about 53% of the City's 2003 tax abatement capacity.
Maplewood's capacity is equal to 10% of the levy in the current year.
The following table illustrates the estimated development schedule and tax abatement
proposed:
Year Taxes Payable
Cll Value
Residential Value
City Abatement
Total PV
Abatement
2006
21,097,345
46,835,870
256,677
218,674
2007
60,232,920
103,980,076
609,867
490
2008
62,039,908
107
628,220
476,331
2009
63,901,105
110
647,123
462,890
2010
65, 818,138
113, 621, 837
666,593
449
2011
67
117,030
686,647
437,133
2012
69,826,463
120,541,406
707,303
424,795
2013
71, 921,257
124,157, 649
728,579
412,804
2014
74, 078, 895
127, 882, 378
750,493
401
Totals
5
Present Value at 6%
3
The developer is requesting a portion of the abatement be provided up-front, and that the
remainder be provided over time (pay as you go) as taxes are generated from the development.
63
City of Maplewood
Legacy Village Abatement Analysis
Page 3
The up -front abatement request would require the City to sell abatement bonds, and
subsequently use the tax revenues generated from the project to service that debt.
At the present time the developer has not identified how much would be needed up- front, vs.
over time. The Council should be aware that there is additional risk in providing abatement
dollars up front rather than on a pay as you go basis.
•
Up-front
o City issues bonds in anticipation of a completed project
o When the project is completed and pays taxes, then those dollars are used to
service the abatement debt
• Pays you clo
o The developer receives its annual abatement subsidy after the project is built
and is paying taxes
The developer has indicated that the "corporate" site user may wish to request tax abatement
for.their specific project, separate from the $3.8 million abatement being requested by Hartford.
If such a "corporate user" request were to come forward it would be directly from the business
itself, not Hartford. Such a request would need to be analyzed separately at the time
information is made available.
Analysis
Springsted reviewed the Real Estate Purchase Agreements to verify a purchase price of'$3.07
psf for the developable portions of land,. and $.50 psf for the delineated wetland area. The total
purchase price of $9,594,337 for 85 acres, plus other costs of $1,758,349 bring the total
purchase price to $11,352,686 or $3.05 psf for the entire site, which lies within a general range
of market pricing for this type of product given its designated use. The "other costs" of
$1,758,349 indicated above include the following:
• Environmental
• Surveys
• Appraisals
• Geotechnical
• Feasibility studies
• Wetland delineation
• Deposits for escrow
• AUAR
* Engineering, landscape drawings, architectural
• Legal
• Staff expenses
• Loan points
• Closing costs
• Interest
An independent appraiser, Shenehon Companies, provided information to the developer on
comparable land sales for multi- family units in neighboring communities. This information is as
follows:
• White Bear Lake 93 units Land sold for $10,172 per unit or $945,996
• Vadnais Heights 90 units Land sold for $5,253 per unit or $472,770
• Roseville 18 units Land sold for $7,500 per unit or $135,000
64
City of Maplewood
Legacy Village Abatement Analysis
Page 4
Little Canada 79 units Land sold for $8,861 per unit or $700,019
Legacy Village is a mixed use project so an adjustment needs to be made subtracting
approximately 17 acres of commercial /retail land from the total of 85 acres to arrive at the
number of acres of land proposed to be development for housing, or 68 acres. 68 acres at
$3.05 psf equals $9,034,344. The project then compares to the numbers above as follows:
Proposed density 855 units/$9,034,344 for land $10,566 per unit
Current density 584 units /$9;034,344 for land $15,469 per unit
The comparison shows the land sale price at the proposed density to be on the high side of the
range of comparables provided by the independent appraisal service. At this proposed (higher)
density, it is not likely that a subsidy would be required to assist the project. However, the
comparison also shows that the current (reduced) density equates to a land price which is
significantly hi her than the comparables provided indicating a need to reduce the land cost in
order to make the project feasible. If, under the current density proposal, a subsidy were
provided to directly reduce the $15,469 per unit to $10,566 per unit, the subsidy would be
$2,863,800 as follows:
1. 584 units (current density) X $10,566 (market land per unit) _ $6,170,544 (market
land price)
2. $9,034,344 (current land price) - $6,170,544 (market land price) = $2
(difference between current land price and market land price)
The other issue with this subsidy analysis is to understand developers lost profit due to a
reduction in density from 855 to 584 units, as discussed earlier in this report. Each unit
constructed provides profit of between $7,000 - $17,000 per unit depending upon whether the
unit is rental or owner occupied, and a variety of other factors. Lost potential earnings from the
density reduction therefore are projected by the developer, using a $15,000 per unit profit, to
exceed $4 million.
Shenehon Companies also provided information on comparable commercial land sales. These
comparables range from $1.22 psf to $8.16 psf. Hartford is projecting commercial land sales to
be $5 - $7 psf which- is within the range of identified comparables.
Hazelwood Abatement
As the Council is aware there are 5 homes facing Hazelwood which were identified in the
original abatement resolution in anticipation of utilizing this tool to assist in the purchase and
removal of the homes. The concept discussed is to acquire, relocate, and remove the homes
and subsequently sell the bare land to Hartford or another developer. Since at this time there
are no estimates as to the value of the future development, no abatement projections can be
made. However, tax dollars generated on the Hartford project could be utilized to assist in the
Hazelwood development, since all of these properties were originally identified within the
"abatement area
This issue will be brought back to the Council at a later date as more specific costs and value
projections are identified. No action on the Hazelwood abatement issue is being requested at
this time.
If a corporate user and the Hazelwood development are granted tax abatement dollars, the
number of years required to pay all abatements will increase. The maximum number of years
65
City of Maplewood
Legacy Village Abatement Analysis
Page 5
for this abatement project is 15. As stated earlier in this report, we project 9 years necessary to
generate a present value abatement equal to $3.8 million.
Conclusion
It is our assessment of the financial components of the project that the proposal is valid in terms
of its projected income and expenses and that the abatement subsidy of $3.8 million is likely
needed in order to make the housing components competitive in the current marketplace. The
commercial components do not require any portion of the subsidy.
We are not able to reach any conclusion about any future potential subsidy for either the
Hazelwood development or the corporate user. We suggest each be examined based on their
own merits at the appropriate time.
Action
Should the Council choose to approve the abatement subsidy to the developer,. the action may
be as follows:
"Authorize preparation of a development agreement with the Hartford Group, Inc.
providing an abatement not to exceed a present value of $3.8 million."
66
Attachment 11
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Hartford Group Inc. applied for a change to the city's land use plan from
BC (business commercial) to R -3H (high density residential) and P (park).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located on the south side of County Road D
between Sauthlawn Drive and Hazelwood Street. The legal description is:
. Dorle Park, Lots 1 -8, 14 15 18 29 -35, Block 2 and Except the West 10 acres, the North !2 of
the .Northeast ,r in Section 3, Township .29, Range 22 (Subject to roads and easements).
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On June 2, 2003, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff
published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing
a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission tabled
action on this proposal since the applicant was in the process of revising their plans.
2. On July 7,. 2003, the planning commission continued discussion of this proposal and
recommended that the city council approve this land use plan change.
3. On Judy 14, 2003, the city council discussed the land use plan change.. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above described
changes since they would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's goals and policies
such as:
1. This project would promote economic development that will expand the property tax
base, increase jobs and provide desirable services.
2. It would provide a wide variety of housing types.
3. It would integrate development with open space areas., community facilities and
significant natural features.
4. Adequate services would be provided such as for streets, utilities, drainage, parks and
open space.
5. This project would provide attractive surroundings at which to shop, work and live.
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003
67
The land use plan changes described in this resolution refer to the following segments of
the Legacy Village development as shown on their preliminary plat for this project:
The following parcels on the Preliminary Plat would be changed to Park.
a. Outlot F —public park; and
b. Outlot I — public park.
All other parcels on the Preliminary Plat except those noted above as Park or remaining BC
would change to R -3H High Density Residential:
c. Lot 1., Block 1 -- rental townhomes, except for the office suites/clubhouse site;
d. Lot 1, Block 2 — rental townhomes;
�e. Lot 1, Block 3 — senior assisted living;
f. Cutlot B — multi- family; and
g. tautlot H — for -sale townhomes;
The .Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on July 14, .2003.
Legacy Village PUQ Juste 30, 2003
M
Attachment 12
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Hartford Group, Inc. applied for a conditional use permit for a planned unit
development to develop a multi -use development called .Legacy village.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located on the south side of County Road D
between Southlawn Drive and Hazelwood Street. The legal description is:
Dorle Park, Lots 1 -8, 14 15 18 29 -36, Block 2 and Except the West 10 acres, the North !2 of
the .Northeast % in Section 3, Township 29, Range 22 (Subject to roads and easements).
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On July 7, 2003 the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. The city council held a .public .hearing on July 14, 2003. City staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by
law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present
written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of
the city staff and planning commission.
.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above- described
conditional use permit because:
1. The use would be located designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the Cit)'s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2_ The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity,. process,. materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage., water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services., including streets.,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design..
Legacy Village PIED June 30,'2003
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to these code requirements:
• All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped June 12, 2003. The
Director of Community Development may approve minor changes.
• The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized
within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The
council may extend this deadline for one year.
I
• The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Approval is also subject to the - following conditions:
13) Rental Townhomes and Office /Clubhouse:
a.. The project will be constructed according to the plans from Hartford Croup dated
8/2/03 in all details, except as specifically modified by these conditions;
b. A sidewalk will be .provided continuously on the north or west side of Street A
between Kennard Street and Hazelwood Drive, including the segment between the
off ce /clubhouse parking lot and townhome buildings 11 and 12;
c. Sidewalk connections will be added connecting the power line trail to the curb of
Street A opposite townhome buildings 6 and 8;
d. The sidewalks serving the fronts of townhome buildings 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20
will be. extended south to connect with the power line trail;
e. Street B and Street C serving the townhomes will be constructed in their entirety
with the townhomes, regardless of the status of the multi- family and commercial
parcels to the east;
f. Parking spaces will be provided at the ends of the driveways at the rear of buildings
1 2 3 and 4; 15/16; 19/20; 21/22; and 25/26, and sidewalks will be provided from
those parking spaces connecting to the front sidewalks of each of those buildings;.
g. The infiltration trenches on the south sides of buildings 13/14, 15/16, and 19/20 will
be modified to accommodate a revised alignment for the power line trail, provided
that reasonable grades are .provided for the trail and any sidewalks connecting to it,
and approval of the city engineer concerning the size and function of the trenches;
h. A 8' -wide sidewalk should be provided if at all possible on the south side of County
Road D for the entire length of the project from Hazelwood Drive to Southlawn
Drive, through continued discussion between the city and Hartford, focusing on
exact sidewalk width., location, and right -of -way needs for turn lanes and other
features of the County Road D project;
Legacy village PUD June 30, 2003
70
i. A sidewalk will be provided on the south side of County Road D and sidewalks will
be provided out to that sidewalk from the north side of buildings 1, 4 21, 22, 23, 24,
and 2.5, as well as to the clubhouse front entry and the clubhouse parking lot;
j. The grades of the power line trail and all sidewalks will meet ADA guidelines for
slope;
k. Overstory trees will be planted along both sides of Street A at an average of 30' -40'
on center instead of the average 70' spacing shown on the plans;
I. Overstory trees will be planted along both sides of Street B and on the west side of
Street C at an average of 30' -40' on center instead of the sometimes 100' spacing
shown on the plans, such additional tree islands to be coordinated with modified
parking bays that might be added to this street;
m. Overstory trees will be planted along both sides of Kennard Street in front of the
townhomes at an average of 30' -40' on center instead of the average 50' -80'
spacing shown on the plans;
n. The curve in the middle of Street A opposite buildings 10 and 12 will be flattened as
much as possible to limit headlights aimed into the front of the units;
o. Front building setbacks (clubhouse and buildings 1, 4 5 14, 15, 21, 22, 23, 24 25,
and 26) to Hazelwood Drive, Kennard Street, and County Road D that are less than
required by the Zoning Code are specifically approved within this PUD as shown on
the site plan, down to a minimum of 5' for the clubhouse and 15' for the townhome
buildings in order to enhance the urban character of the streets and intersections;
p. Side yard building setbacks for all buildings that are less than required by the
Zoning Code are specifically approved within this PUD as shown on the site plan;
q. Visitor parking spaces for the rental townhomes will be added or modified as
follows:
i. Parking spaces will be added so there is a total of at least 48 spaces on the
west side of Kennard and at. least 51 spaces on the east side of Kennard,
such that the front door of no unit is more than 200 feet from a group of at
Feast 5 spaces.
ii. Street A will be widened to 26' curb -to -curb and on- street parallel parking
will be added along the north and west sides of the street except for within
100' of the pavement of Hazelwood Drive and Kennard Street.
iii. The private drive immediately south of buildings 2 and 3 will be widened to
26' curb -to -curb and on- street parallel parking will be added along the north
side of the drive.
iv. Parking areas will be added behind buildings 1 and 4 where the driveway
abuts the ponding area, consistent with the recommendation of the city
engineer on providing adequate grading and functioning of the pond.
Legacy village PUD June 30, 2003
71
v. Parking areas will be added behind buildings 15/16, 19/20, 21/22, and 25/26
to meet the parking and distance criteria cited here.
vi. Street B will be widened to 26' curb -to -curb and parallel parking will be
added along the north and west sides of the street, or additional angled
parking will be added to meet the criteria for parking spaces cited here.
r. The parking lot for the clubhouse /office building will be modified to add "proof of
parking" spaces in the green area north and east of the swimming pool, for a total
of 91. spaces possible in the tot. Such spaces will only be constructed if the owner
believes they are needed, or if they are needed in the future to address parking
problems at the building in the opinion of the community development director, who
can order the spaces. to be constructed. Such spaces will maintain a sidewalk
connection between the swimming pool and clubhouse building in an island in the
middle of the parking Days as shown on the plans;
s. An easement over the power line trail on this parcel will be provided to the city for
access and maintenance.
14) Senior Assisted Living:
a. Front building setbacks to Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway that are less than
required by the Zoning Code are specifically approved within this PUD as shown on
the site plan, down to a minimum of 5', in order to enhance the urban character of
the streets and intersection;
b. Emergency exits two fronting Kennard Street and one fronting Legacy Parkway —
will provide sidewalk connections to the sidewalks on the street ;.
c. A sidewalk connection will be provided near the south side of the building
connecting Kennard Street to the path around the pond to the east;
d. The entry at the far south end of the building will provide a sidewalk connection to
the sidewalk noted above;
e. The emergency exit on the southwest face of the building near the south end of the
building will provide a sidewalk connection to the sidewalk noted above;
f. The emergency exit on the south face of the northeastern leg of the building will
provide a sidewalk connection south to the sidewalk abutting the parking tot;.
g. Overstory trees will be planted along the east side of Kennard Street and the south
side of Legacy Parkway at an average of 30' -40' on center instead of the average
80' -100' spacing shown on the plans;
h. Revise the site plan to show proof -of- parking to reduce the amount of surface
parking..
95) Multi - Family Site (Outlot B):
Legacy village PUD June 30,. 2003
72
a. The multi - family site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will come in for
design review and approval at a later date, but the use of the property is allowed as
long as the provisions of the R--3A or R -313 zoning. district (depending on the
building size) and conditions outlined here are met;
b. The multi- family site is approved for up to 50 units of housing;
c. A building corner should be within 30' of the curb on the roundabout to maintain the
character of the intersection;
d. The building or buildings must be designed to continue the general pattern and
sight lines of the townhomes to the west;
e. Sidewalk connections must be provided to the power line trail on the south side of
the parcel;
f. Visitor parking must be provided at a ratio of 1/2 space per unit no more than 200'
from the front door of any unit if townhomes are built, or the front entry of the
apartment building if apartments are built;
g. A play area or tot lot must be provided on site with easy access to the building
entries and to the power line trail, within reasonable sight of as many of the units as
possible;
h. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the adjacent townhomes and other buildings if present;
i. Overstory trees must be planted along the north side of the extension of Street B at
an average of 30' -40' on center;
j. An easement over the power line trail on this parcel will - be provided to the city for
access and maintenance.
16) Retail/Commercial (Outlot A):
a. The retail/commercial site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will came
in for design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as long as
the provisions of the BC zoning district and conditions outlined here are met;
b. The building(s) on the retail /commercial site should be sited on the north side of the
parcel within 15' of the County Road D right -of -way with all parking to the south;
c. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall not exceed 12 feet in height;
d. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the adjacent townhomes and other buildings if present;
Legacy Village PUD June 30,, 2003
73
e. Access to the site will be off the east leg of the roundabout and another access
drive off Street C between the roundabout and County Road D; and to County Road
D at a shared driveway with the adjacent furniture store site;
f. All ground- mounted and roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to ordinance;
g. Overstory trees must be planted along the south side of the extension of Street B at
an average of 30' -40' on center.
h. Adequate separation, buffering and screening must be provided for the multi- family
residential units from the front doors, parking areas, loading areas, and mechanical
equipment of this commercial building;
17) Furniture .Store (Outlot C):
a. The furniture store is planned in concept only within the PUD and will come in for
design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as long as the
provisions of the BC zoning district and conditions outlined here are .met;
b. The building should be sited on the north side of the parcel within 15' of the County
Road D and Southlawn Drive rights -of -way with all parking to the south. The design
of the comer of the building should be such that reasonable and safe sight
distances are maintained at County Road D and Southlawn;
c. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan: One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall not exceed 12 feet in height;
d. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the adjacent townhomes and other buildings if present;
e. Access to the site will be off the extension of the east leg of the roundabout, to
County Road D at a shared driveway with the adjacent retail /commercial site and
up to two driveway accesses to Southlawn Drive at points to be approved by the
city engineer;
f. Al! ground - mounted and roof- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to ordinance;
g. Overstory trees must be planted along the west side of Southlawn Drive at an
average of 30' -40' on center.
h. Adequate separation, buffering and screening must be provided for the multi- family
residential units from the front doors, parking areas, loading areas, and mechanical
equipment of this commercial building.
18) Commercial Site (Outlot D):
a, The commercial site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will come in for
Legacy Village PUD June 34, 2003
74
design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as long as the
provisions of the BC zoning district and conditions outlined here are net ;.
b. One of the buildings on the commercial site should be sited close to the corner of
Southlawn Drive and Legacy Parkway, within 30' of the Southlawn Drive right -of-
way;
c. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall not exceed 12 feet in height ;.
d. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the nearby senior assisted - living building., townhomes and other buildings if present;
e. Access to the site will be off Legacy Parkway and onto Southlawn if approved by
the city engineer;
f. All - ground- mounted and roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to ordinance;
g. The parking lot on this site must provide through connections and .cross parking
easements with the parcel to the south (Outtot E);
h. There must be sidewalks connecting entries to all buildings on site to Legacy
Parkway, Southlawn Drive, the path around the pond to the west, and to Outiot E.
Such sidewalks must be separated from the parking lot — at curb level, not parking
lot level;
i. Uses on the site are encouraged to take advantage of the park and trail system
around the ponding area to the west by providing _outdoor seating, plazas,
overlooks or similar features;
j. Overstory trees must be planted along the north side of Legacy Parkway and the
west side of Southlawn Drive an average of 30' -40' on center.
k. An easement over the power line trail on this parcel will be provided to the city for
access and maintenance.
19) Restaurant Site (Outlot E):
a. The restaurant site is planned in concept only within the PUD and will come in for
design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as long as the
provisions of the .BC zoning district and conditions outlined here are met;
b. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall not exceed 12 feet in height;
c. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the nearby senior assisted - living building., townhomes and other buildings if. present;
Legacy Village PUD June 30, x.003
75
d. Access to the site will be off a shared driveway with the shopping center property to
the south, provided easements and agreements can be reached with that property
owner to provide such access. Access will be provided. onto Southlawn if approved
by the city engineer;
e. All ground- mounted- and roof- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to the ordinance;
f. The . parking lot on this site must provide through connections and cross parking
easements with the parcel to the north ( Outlot D);
g. There must be a sidewalk on the south side of the site connecting Southlawn Drive
with the trail around the ponding. area to the west. There must also be sidewalks
connecting the building entry to the shared driveway on the south side, Southlawn
Drive., and to Outlot D. Such sidewalks must be separated from the parking lot — at
curb level, not parking lot level;
h. Uses on the site are encouraged to take advantage of the park and trail system
around the ponding area to the west by providing outdoor seating, plazas,
overlooks or similar features;
i. Overstory trees must be planted along the west side of Southlawn Drive and the
north side of the driveway access on the south side of the site at an average of 30'-
40' on center.
20) Corporate /Commercial Site ( Outlot G):
a. The corporate /commercial site is planned. in concept only within the PUD and will
come in for design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as
long as the provisions of the BC zoning district and conditions outlined here are
met;
b. The building must be sited close to the roundabout intersection on the corner of
Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway, within 15' of both rights -of -way, to maintain
_.__. the character of the intersection, with parking to the north and east - of - the building;
c. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. One criteria to be
established, however, is that pylon signs shall not be allowed. Monument signs
may be allowed, but shall not exceed 12 feet in height;
d. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the nearby senior assisted - living building, townhomes and other buildings if present;
e. Access to the site will be off Legacy Parkway and Kennard Street. The driveway
access to Kennard Street at the northwest corner of the site may move north if
needed for the realignment of the power line trail and to align with the driveway
entrance to the park on the west side of Kennard;
f. All ground - mounted and roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
according to ordinance;
Legacy Village PUD June 34, 2043
76
g. There must be sidewalks connecting entries to all buildings on site to Legacy
Parkway, Kennard Street, and through the parking lot to the. power line trail;
h. Uses on the site are encouraged to take advantage of the park and trail system
around the ponding area to the west by providing outdoor seating, plazas,
overlooks or similar features;
i. Overstory trees must be planted along the east side of Kennard Street and the
north side of Legacy Parkway at an average of .30' -40' on center.
j. Adequate separation, buffering and screening must be provided for the multi - family
residential units from the front doors, parking areas, loading areas, and mechanical
equipment of this commercial building.
21) For -Sale Townhomes (Outlot H):
a. The for -sale townhome site is planned in concept only within the PUD! and will
come in for design review and approval at a later date, but the use is allowed as
long as the provisions of the R -3C zoning district and conditions outlined here are
met;
b. Townhome buildings must be sited close to the roundabout intersection on the
corner of Kennard Street and Legacy Parkway, and close to Kennard Street, within
20' of both rights -of -way, to maintain the character of the intersection and the
streetscape;
c. The architectural character and exterior building materials must be in keeping with
the nearby senior assisted - living building, townhomes and other buildings in the
development;
d. Access to the site will be off the west leg of the roundabout at Legacy Parkway and
Kennard Street, plus another access to Kennard Street further south, most likely in
a loop street through the site. If the properties west of Outlot H fronting Hazelwood
Drive are likely to develop when Outlot H is proposed for development, then
consideration will be given to a public through street connecting Kennard Street and
Hazelwood Drive as an extension of Legacy Parkway;
e. There must be sidewalks connecting entries to all buildings on site to Legacy
Parkway, Kennard Street, and the park and power line trail to the north. Such
sidewalks must be designed within a clear system of open spaces and landscaping
that serves all units more or less equally;
f. Visitor parking must be provided at a ratio of 1/2 space per unit no more than 200'
. from the front door of any townhouse unit;
g. Overstory trees must be planted along the west side of Kennard Street and along
both sides of the major internal street(s) at an average of 30' -40' on center.
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003
77
22) Public Park with Trail (Outlot F):
a. The property will be deeded to the City as public park land, but will not be credited
as land area in park dedication requirements. See Parks Director Bruce
Anderson's memorandum (attached).
b. Hartford will construct all the grading, ponding, and trails noted on the plans;
c. Hartford will secure all necessary easements and agreements with the shopping
center property owner to the south for grading and construction of the trail on the
south side of the pond (and the extension of that trail west around the south side of
the senior assisted living building. noted previously). Once agreed to, an easement
at least 5' wider than the trail surface will be dedicated to the city for access and
maintenance of the trail
23) Public Park (Outlot I):
a. The property will be deeded to the City as public park land, but will not be credited
as land area in park dedication requirements. See Parks Director Bruce
Anderson's memorandum (attached).
b. Hartford will construct all the grading, play fields, equipment, and parking noted on
the plans or as negotiated with the city;
c. The power line trail will be realigned to cross Kennard Street further north to
accommodate sidewalk connections to the townhomes to the north;
d. Sidewalk connections will be provided in several locations to the power line trail in
reasonable locations to connect all major activity areas with the trail;
e. Sidewalk connections will be provided in appropriate locations to the sidewalk and
green space system of the townhome development to the south, at such time as
that development is planned or in place;
f. Hartford will secure easements and agreements with the property owner to the
south for the trail on the south side of the pond (and the extension of that trail west
around the south side of the senior assisted - living building noted previously). Once
agreed to, an easement at least 5' wider than the trail surface will be dedicated to.
the city for access and maintenance of the trail.
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003
WI
24) The Legacy Village site as a whole:
a. The applicant shall dedicate wetland- protection buffers around each wetland within
this development. The width of each buffer shall be according to each wetlands
classification as determined by the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District.
These buffers shall be dedicated to the City of Maplewood and shall be dedicated
to the city prior to the issuance of the first building permit for this development.
b. The applicant shall install wetland- protection buffer signs around each wetland
buffer. These signs shall state "there shall be no mowing, cutting, filling or dumping
beyond this point."
c. The community design review board shall review the landscape plans using the
criteria herein as a guide.
d. The architectural- plans for all buildings in Legacy Village are subject to'the approval
of the community design review board.
e. The grading, drainage, erosion control, utility and roadway plans (public and
private) are subject to the approval of the city engineer.
f. The applicant shall meet the tree-replacement/tree-preservation requirements of
the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
g. The city will be strictly enforcing the 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. no -noise requirement and
strictly enforcing dust - control efforts for all phases of this development.
h. The applicant shall coordinate the installation of the sidewalk along the County
Road D alignment with the city engineer.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on July 14, 2003.
Legacy Village PUD June 30, 2003
79
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
,action b-,,
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
SUBJECT: Kennard Street Improvements � -:
(Beam to County Rd D), Project03 -04:
7 :45 p.m. Public Hearing and Approve Resolution �`
pp
1. Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing
2. Approving Plans and Specifications
3. Authorizing Advertisement for Bids
4. Authorizing Acquisition of Right of Way
5. Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll
6. Ordering Assessment Hearing
DATE: July 7, 2003
Introduction
The Legacy Village project requires the extension of Kennard Street between Beam Avenue and
County Road D as part of the internal roadway system. A preliminary report on the improvements and
the financing plan has been prepared. A public hearing is needed prior to proceeding with the ro'ect.
p 1
A resolution approving the project and the project plans, along with authorization to receive bids and to
acquire right of way negotiations, and finally ordering preparation of the assessment roll and callin g of
the assessment hearing is needed to allow this project to proceed. Four votes of the council are
required for approval of this resolution.
Background
The Legacy Village of Maplewood development proposes to orient a majority of their site traffic to the
center of their project toward a newly constructed Kennard Street. On May 12, 2003, the City Council
approved the AUAR for Legacy Village. The AUAR required the construction of Kennard Street as
part of the Legacy Village Improvements. Following the AUAR approval, the council authorized the
preparation of the preliminary report. The report identifies various features for construction of
Kennard, including a parkway -type of design with sidewalks on both side of the roadway, a roundabout
in the center of the Legacy Village project, utility extensions and extensive storm water treatment
devices. An alternative roadway is proposed to connect St. John's Boulevard to Kennard as p art of
the local St. John's Hospital campus improvements.
A public hearing has been called for July 14 to consider ordering the project. Due to schedule
concerns, the Legacy Village developer has provided an escrow to cover project costs if the
improvement does not proceed, and they have requested a fast'improvement process. To speed the
schedule, the attached resolution approves the project as well as the plans and specifications, along
with negotiations for the necessary project right of way and easements. Prior to an award of a
construction contract, an assessment hearing will be held to secure the funding, which is mainly from
the Hartford development of Legacy Village. This will allow for construction of Kennard to be open for
traffic in 2003 as needed for the development of Legacy Village.
City Council Agenda Background
Kennard Street Public Hearing
July 7, 2003
Page Two
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution that orders the
improvement to be constructed, approves the plans and specifications, authorizes receipt of
bids, authorizes acquisition of right of way, orders preparation of the assessment roll, and
orders an Assessment Hearing for the Kennard Street Improvements (Beam to County Road D
City Project 03 -04.
jw
Attachment: Preliminary Report (previously provided to the Council)
Resolution
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
CALLING ASSESSMENT HEARING
WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 23rd day of June 2003, fixed a
date for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for Kennard Street ( Beam to
County Road D), City Project 03 -04;
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the
hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on July 14, 2003, and the council has
heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same;
AND WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on June 23, 2003,
plans and specifications for Kennard Street Improvements (County Road D to Beam Ave.),
City Project 03 -04, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who
has presented such plans and specifications to,the council for approval,
AND WHEREAS, this resolution authorizes the city clerk and city engineer to receive
bids for the making of these improvements,
AND WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer-will, at the direction of the council,
prepare an assessment roll for the Kennard Street Improvements (County Road D to Beam
Ave.), City Project 03 -04, and the said assessment will be placed on file in the office of the
city engineer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibilit
report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements to Kennard Street (Beam to County
Road D), City Project 03 -04.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution
adopted the 14th day of July 2003.
3. A project budget of $2,866,986 is hereby established for the making of this
improvement.
4. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a
part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk.
5. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in
the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice,
at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall
state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the council at 10:00 a.m. on the
15th day of August, 2003, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed
and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City
of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid.
.6. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive,
open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the
bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular
city council meeting of August 25, 2003.
7. The city engineer is hereby authorized to proceed with the necessary
acquisition of easements and right of way as detailed in the feasibility report for the making of
Y p g
the improvement. Said acquisition shall include authorization of the city attorney to acquire
parcels through the use of eminent domain proceedings as determined necessary by the city
engineer and city attorney. .
8. The city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to
be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided b law,
p Y ,
and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection, AND
FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council
thereof,
9. A hearing shall be held on the 25th day of August 2003, at the city hall at 7:00
p. m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons
owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with
reference to such assessment.
10. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to
the hearing, and to mail notices .to the owners of all property affected by said assessment.
11. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and lace of hearing, p g,
general nature of the improvement, the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment
roll is on file with the clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered.
Approved this 14th day of July 2003.
Agenda # 1� I
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager w .
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: July 7, 2002
RE: Off -Sale Liquor License /Cigarette and Tobacco License
Tntrodiicti on
Action by Council
Date
E
Mo
1.
Rejected
Blong Lee has submitted an application for an off -sale liquor license and a cigarette and tobacco
license to be used at 2728 Stillwater Road. Mr. Lee's store will operate as Princess Liquor'n
Tobacco.
Background
As required by city ordinances, the necessary background investigation was completed by the
Police Department on Mr. Lee. Nothing was identified in the background check that would
prohibit Mr. Lee from holding these licenses.
Mr. Lee has been a permanent resident of the United States since June 1, 1978 and currently
resides in St. Paul. Over the last five years, Mr. Lee has held positions as a manager for an
oriental grocery store, manager at a pool hall and most recently as a truck driver.
During the investigation, the following checks were completed: State and Federal criminal
history check, State motor vehicle and driver's license files and State and National Wants and
Warrants. During the background investigation, it was learned that Mr. Lee had previously lived
in Fort Worth, Texas. Contact was made with the Fort Worth Police Department and they had
no reported contacts with Mr. Lee.
Mr. Lee has been given a copy of the City Code of Ordinances that applies to being an off -sale
liquor license and cigarette and tobacco license holder and met with Chief Thomalla on June 17,
2003 regarding alcohol compliance procedures, local ordinances and state statutes related to
holding an off -sale intoxicating liquor license.
Recommendation
The off -sale liquor license and the cigarette and tobacco license are submitted for council
approval.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Tax - Increment Financing Development Agreement
PROJECT: Sibley Cove
LOCATION 1996 County Road D and Ariel Street
APPLICANT Sibley Cove Limited Partnership (David Steele)
DATE: July 8, 2003
INTRODUCTION
Agenda # �--
The applicant is requesting that the city council approve the final development agreement for the
tax - increment financing (TIF) for the Sibley Cove apartment proposal. This project will be on the
south side of County Road D, west of Ariel Street. (See the maps on. pages 4 through 6.) The
applicant is proposing to develop an 80 -unit apartment building with 40 units of affordable or work
force housing on a 7.1 -acre site. (See the proposed site plan on page 6.)
The applicant is requesting that the city approve the use of 90 percent of the TI F for up to 26
years. In return for this financing, the developer would keep the rents affordable for low and
moderate- income persons for work force housing.
BACKG
On April 28, 2003, the city council approved the following for the Sibley Cove apartments:
1. A change in the city's land use plan. This change was from BC (business commercial) to
R-3(H) (residential high density).
2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 100 -unit (8U
units in phase one with room for an additional 20 units) apartment development. The
applicant requested the CUP because the existing BC (business commercial) and LBC
(limited business commercial) zoning districts limit the uses on the site to commercial,
office and retail uses and allow multiple - family residential uses only with a conditional use
permit. (.See the property line /zoning map on page 5.)
3. The project design plans.
On June 23, 2003, the city council gave preliminary approval for the use of TIF for the Sibley Cove
development..
DISCUSSION
Tax - increment Financing
Tax- increment financing uses the increase in taxes from a development to finance projects with a
public purpose. Tax increment is the difference in taxes between the current amount and the
amount after a project is completed. The developer is requesting 90 percent of the first 26 years of
tax- increment from this project. The financial consultant estimates that the gross tax - increment
from this project would be nearly $100, 000 each year. The actual amount would vary because
actual future -year tax rates and tax capacities will vary.
Tax'increment money would normally go to the various taxing jurisdictions. The largest recipients
would be the city, county and school district. The following chart shows the taxes from this project
that each governmental unit would receive if the developer built this project without TIF
Unit of Government Tax Impact (2003 Rate and Values)
City of Maplewood $26
Ramsey County $40
1. S. D. #622 .$18
Others None
TOTAL $85,292
Paul Steinman of Springsted did an analysis of the proposed- project financing and the amount of
TIF assistance the developer will need to make the project feasible. (Please see his memo starting
on page 32.) His analysis has verified a financing gap of about $1.18 million and that this should
.be the maximum amount of subsidy that the developer should get for the project.
Development Agreement
The. proposed development agreement will be the contract between the city and the developer for
the TIF for this proposal. This agreement outlines all the responsibilities of the city and the
developer for the use of the TIF in the project.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the city and developer to execute a development agreement for the Sibley Cove
Apartments on County Road D. This agreement shall provide a tax increment note in the principal
.amount of $1,175,234 with an interest rate of 4.75. percent for the Sibley Cove Limited Partnership
for the Sibley Cove Apartments on County Road D.
2
REFERENCE
Past Actions on other Housing Financing
1982: Council gave concept approval to using tax - increment financing to help with the
development of a seniors housing project. This project would have used about
$150,000 of tax- increment funds for each of two senior housing developments (Hazel
Ridge and Bennington Woods). The developer abandoned the program.
1- 14 -85: The council gave preliminary approval for $5.8 million of tax - exempt financing for up to
100 units for the Hazel Ridge Seniors Residence at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue.
11- 25 -85: The council gave preliminary approval for $6.5 million of tax - exempt financing for the
116 -unit Harmony School (Casey Lake) Seniors Residence (County Road C and White
Bear Avenue). This was subject to construction beginning within one year. (The
developer never built this project.)
1987 -88: The council approved $2,448,100 of tax - exempt housing revenue bonds for the 60 unit
Cottages of Maplewood (Village on Woodlynn) project. The council also approved
$275 of tax - increment financing.
1988: The city received a federal grant (CDBG) of $252,500 for the 'Village on Woodlynn.
The developer used this money toward the purchase of. the land.
1991: The city council approved tax - exempt and tax - increment financing for the Carefree
Cottages of Maplewood (Phases I and II). In 1993, the council asked the county to
approve a low- interest loan for this project. The county approved the loan.
2003: The city council approved a tax - increment financing request for the Van Dyke Village
town houses. on Van Dyke Street.
Income Limits
,The income limits for the work force housing residents in this development are:
1. A three - person- household, at the 50 percent median income level, will have an annual
income of about $34,500 per year.
2. A three- person household, at the 60 percent median income level, will have an annual
income of about $41, 00 per year.
The city and county consider the two types of households listed above as examples of
moderate - income or work force households.
krlp:Sec 2N /Sibley Cove TIF 2.mem
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Proposed Development Agreement
5. July 7, 2003 memo from Paul Steinman
3
Attachment 1
A
L S
am
)nd
mac`•
ptodh �.
.
Cr.
a
W
�
Z
0
�
z 1—
V1 seo a,.
Pol k
,S �
3
Z
g
z
U..
Y
j
O
W
N
0
AVE
A
L S
am
)nd
mac`•
ptodh �.
.
Cr.
a
.
Di
cr , EDGEHILL RD.
:5 w
DEMONT U. AVM Ml
BROOKS
W
�
Z
i
.ROAD D
�
z 1—
V1 seo a,.
Pol k
o
Z
z
Ll .3 a
Z
cn
U..
�,Q
OODLYNN AVE.
W
N
0
-
to °
cc
.
Di
cr , EDGEHILL RD.
:5 w
DEMONT U. AVM Ml
BROOKS
W HITE BkAR LAKE
COUNTY
i
.ROAD D
�
z 1—
V1 seo a,.
Pol k
o
Z
z
Ll .3 a
PROPOSED TIF DISTRICT GALL AVE.
cn
U..
�,Q
OODLYNN AVE.
.PR&4 o
-
to °
cc
2.
LYDIA
mcno
Y Y Y Dw
aL CL wz ca O AVE.
fa
< —J=
!- tL
� � o �
0 a z�
UJ w
o w z
Y AVE.Q
_ C3 m
v w
C
STANDRIDGE 3
z
MAPLE
J
LA.
BEAM Pat*
AVE. �--
.
MAPLE
VIEW AVE. Z
RADATZ Q
Cr.
AVE.
UESAW
AV
I
RAMSEY
COUNTY �
w
W
ORTH SAINT PA
COt1RT'
w KOHLMANC
Cl
AVE
Lake �^
i
.
Di
cr , EDGEHILL RD.
:5 w
DEMONT U. AVM Ml
BROOKS
AVE.
�
z 1—
V1 seo a,.
Pol k
o
Z
z
Ll .3 a
z
z
W
Y
U..
CT.
J
W
EL Q'
a
AVE
J
z
LOCATION 'MAP
4
0
T
Attachment 2
L T'571
1 .694 .:n
1
i s �• c at. .. 7 •
y �+ - i V
ZS
(7) 16 K 4,*4
1 5 N ov 4 (/
T WENDY S, o� I AMOCO. - = L' c o k; E
too
- zo:;9• _ - , - s 7e. i COU ROAD D '^ - _ ■r.�..,�
r _
3 s, o °' V . , ^ash 33 X97..958' -
o ARBY S
S i.g�ac.
3100 DAYCARE.
C 4 26 ( 0 9 _
/5&c
, v90 0 1
z -g 1_ a o J CENT
5 .89 ° ..a9 r 4(o "E !8'1.Z•�' 68• Q p
'^ SITE
i
r •253 Ci _
160 �� -I o0 � � h (�)
f m 309 2� �; 00
_ Q
9 ' C - 340. 5)
(1-7) 02
O
H O W �
i
o `
3088
SITE
-- - ---- - - - - -- - -•W� - -493.5 - __ - -- -- ° _
> -
- -- - -- - .-- -- Q • � �- .� - P' Li+i� hoc
�, 3070 i �6'
im
. - L11 a: _
mom
Ali
='p o O ° C -(,o) 8 -21_79 0
1985 3050 `" ' ..oF - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -. - - - --
,
N o ti o t. Sat. ' 202 ti
Url
3y $3 .96 ^ c . M �•� -- - ; 3.o t ac
24o r - - 9 i• -{
CID .:;
114 ^ s .�' 2Z O• v� , c�', g 2-4
.45 iq �•• s n WOODLYNN AVENUE _ . •
�6
PLAZA 3000 °� .� M
c ,
` f Lo i° O
7r • (►Z;
z . 4�-0� a� 43
�.rooac .,r
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
1 5
4
N
Attachment 3
CO ROA "D "
t
1 _
_ •
r
14.9r; 7.3.0 N14.5 I
OT
i
v
1i
w • _ .. — � t 111 vvvrr
r
- N DAYCARE CENTER I
_ - � ► I t�
NO
-JA 3axic
TOT = i
7 174.0
4 •
r -- : •: —__ ___ -- - -- -147 - -- t- - - - -•— I
Is
�. 4 �, i W
W
•e : ': 1
• • •- � ; y 224.0 X �
L - -�- • w r, ¢ PARCEL A
• L •..
♦ • �T', '
•♦ �,;�. , I I 1" n{ IpAp(" srMii 1
Fi I I t PAl�dwd s1A<�LS I I I I I I I I I P
•� r r � r r i ,� 1 � " {I t 1 t 1 ! f
' i I �� . s ` t 1 I! I 1 I I I FliTU k 1PAkWO I
' OWING BIT. " • � ���%G1 ' ' � �. � i � 1..� J
W '
*96' FA
'' ' RADIUS • Q
s • " � � I
+ *131' FALL
RADIUS ' • .... ' 1
' STCAMWATM PCNMG '
R ; ; a
nr • I
st r. ST r
• I i
f I •
♦ Ir
4
N
•
'
• , .... • ' '
TYPICAL.
PARKING STALLS'
E)CISTING Bua ou+�G
TYPICAL
'HANDICAP STALLS'
SITE DATA
BOUNDARY AREA... _......_ .....,..__ _ -*310, 120 Sq.Ft.
PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING AREA 7 ,*32,230 Sq,Ft.
PROPOSED TOT LOT *900 S. q.Ft.
PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT--±5.3,432 Sq. Ft.
PROPOSED SIDEWALK ±7,207 Sq -Ft.
{ f 1
. era f .a�
suers
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE *93,.769 Sq.Ft.
TOTAL OPEN SPACE :*216. Sq.-Ft.
NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS ---- ---100 Stalls
(INCLUDES 2 HANDICAPED STALLS)
4
N
Attachment 4
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND - BETWEEN
THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
AND
SIBLEY COVE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
This document drafted by: BRIGGS AND MORGAN
Professional Association
2200 First National Bank Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 5 5101
7
1545693vl
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
.ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS ................ ........... .... 6
... ........
Section 1.1 Definitions .......................................................... ..............................6
ARTICLE II REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES :............ o_ ............................. 8
Section 2.1 Representations and warranties of the City ........ ............................... 8
Section 2.2 Representations and warranties of the Developer .............................. 8
ARTICLE III UNDERTAKINGS BY DEVELOPER AND CITY ....... .............................10
Section 3.1 Land Acquisition and Site Improvements ........................... ..........10
Section 3.2 Reimbursement: Tax Increment Revenue Note ... .............................10
Section 3.3 Compliance with Low and Moderate Income Requirements.............11
Section 3.4 Repair and Replacement Reserve Fund .............. ............................12
Section 3.5 Project Manager ............... ......... ............................... ......................12
ARTICLE IV EVENTS OF DEFAULT ................................ ............................... J ............14
. Section 4.1
Events of Default Defined .................. ............................... ..............14
Section 4.2
Remedies on Default ............ .........14
. ................... ...............................
Section 4.3
No Remedy Exclusive ........................................ .............................15
Section 4.4
No Implied Waiver .. .. .. ..
15
Section 4.5
Agreement to Pay Attorney's Fees and Expenses .............................15
Section 4.6
Indemnification of City ..................................... ...............................
15
ARTICLE V DEVELOPER' OPTION TO TERMINATE AGREEMENT ..................... 17
Section 5.1 The Developer's Option to Terminate ................... 17
Section 5.2 Action to Terminate ......:..................................... .............................17
Section 5.3 Additional Right to Terminate .......................... ...............................
17
Section 5.4 Effect of Termination ...................
ARTICLE VI ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ....................................... .............................18
Section 6.1 Restrictions on Use ............ ....................... .............................18
Section 6.2 Conflicts of Interest ....... ..........18
........................... .............................
Section 6.3 Titles of Articles and Sections ............................ ...........................18
Section 6.4 Notices and Demands ....................................... ...............................
18
Section 6.5 Counterparts .................................................... ............................... .
19
Section 6.6 Law Governing ................................................... .............................19
Section6.7 Expiration .......................................................... .............................19
Section 6.8 Provisions Surviving Rescission or Expiration .... .............................19
Section6.9 Assignment ....................................................... .............................19
Signatures.................................................... ............................... .......... ............................... S -1
Exhibits................................................................................................... ............................... A -1
EP
1545693v1 ii
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the day of July, 2003, by and between the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City "), - a municipal corporation organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Minnesota and Sibley Cove, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited
partnership (the "Developer "),
wITNESSETH:
w1-1EREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.124 through 469.134, the City
has formed Municipal Development District No. 1 (the "Development District" ) and has adopted
a development program therefore (the "Development Program "); and
WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 through
469.179, as amended, (hereinafter the "Tax Increment Act "), the City has created, within the
Development District, Housing District No. 1 -8 (the "Tax Increment Districts') and adopted a tax
increment financing plan, dated June 23, 2003, (the "Tax Increment Plan ") therefore which
.provides for the use of tax increment financing in connection with certain development within
the Development District; and
. w]H3EREAS, in order to achieve the objectives of the. Development Program and
particularly to make the land in the Development District available for development by. private.
enterprise in conformance with the Development Program, the City has determined to assist the
Developer With the financing of certain costs of a Project (as hereinafter defined) to be
constructed within the Tax Increment District as more particularly set forth in this Agreement;
and
WHEREAS,, the City believes that the development and construction of the Project, and
fulfillment of this Agreement are vital and are in the best interests of the City, the health, safety,
morals and welfare of residents of the City, and in accordance with the ublic purpose and
p P �
provisions of the applicable state and local laws and requirements under which the Project has
been undertaken and is being assisted:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration, of the premises and the mutual obligations of the
parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: \
1545693v1 - S -1
0
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1 Definitions All capitalized terms. used and not otherwise defined herein
shall have the following meanings unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
Agreement means this Agreement, as the same may be from time to time modified,
amended or supplemented;
Business Day means any day except a Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday or a day on
which b 1011 g institutions in the City are authorized by law or executive order to close;
City means the City of Maplewood, Minnesota;
Compliance Certificate means the Compliance Certificate in substantially the form
attached hereto as Exhibit D;
Count means Ramsey County, Minnesota;
Developer means Sibley Cove, Limited Partnership, - its successors and assigns;
Development District means the real property described in the Development Program;
Development Program means the development program approved in connection with the
Development District;
Development Propei_ means the real property legally described in Exhibit A attached to
this Agreement;
Event of Default means any of the events described in Section 4.1 hereof
Note Payment Date means February 1, 2005,' and each February 1 and August 1 of. each
year thereafter to and including August -1, 2030; provided, that if an such Note Payment Date
y y
should not be a Business Day, the Note Payment Date shall be the next succeeding Business
Day;
Prime Rate means the rate of interest from time to time publicly announced by I.T.S. Bank
National Association in Minneapolis, Minnesota, as its "reference rate' or an successor rate,
,
which rate shall change as and when that prime rate or successor rate changes;
Project means the 80 unit multifamily housing development to be located on the
Development Property to be known as the Sibley Cove Project;
Site Improvements means the site improvements undertaken or to be undertaken on the
Development Property, more particularly described on Exhibit C attached hereto;
1545693v1
S -2
10
State means the State of Minnesota;
Tax Increments means *90% of the tax increments derived from the Development
Property that have been received and retained by the City in accordance with- the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177;
Tax Increment Act means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, as
amended;
Tax Increment District means Housing District No. 1 -8 located within the Development
District, a description of which is set forth in the Tax Increment Financin g � Pl which was
qualified as a housing district under the Tax Increment Act;
Tax Increment Financing Plan means the tax increment financing plan approved for the
Tax Increment District by the City Council on June 23, 2003;
Tax Increment Note means the Tax Increment Revenue Note. (Sibley Cove Project) to be
executed by the City and delivered to the Developer pursuant to Article III hereof, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
Unavoidable Delays means delays, outside the - control of the art claiming its
p � g
occurrence, which are the direct result of strikes, other labor troubles, unusually severe or
prolonged bad weather, acts of God, fire or other casualty to the Project, litigation commenced
by third parties which, by injunction or other similar judicial action or by the exercise of
reasonable discretion, directly results in delays, or acts y of an federal, state. or local
governmental unit (other than the City) which directly result in delays.
1545693v1 s_3
11
ARTICLE H
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Section 2.1 Representations and warranties of the City The City makes the following
representations and warranties:
(1) The City is a municipal corporation and has the power to enter into this
Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder.
(2) Based on the representation of the Developer set forth in Section 3.4 below, the
Tax Increment District is a "housing district" within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section
469.174, Subdivision 11, and was created, adopted and approved in accordance with the ' terms of
the Tax Increment Act.
(3) The development contemplated by this Agreement is in conformance with the
development objectives set forth in the Development Program.
(4) To finance certain costs within the Tax Increment District the City proposes
- � Y oses P p
subject to the further provisions of this Agreement, to apply Tax Increments to reimburse the
Developer for the costs of the acquisition of the Development Property and certain Site
Improvements incurred in connection with the Project as further provided in this Agreement.
(5) The City makes no representation or warranty, either express or implied, as to the
Development Property or its condition or the soil conditions thereon, or that the Development
Property shall be suitable for the Developer' purposes or needs.
Section 2.2 Representations and Warranties of the Developer The Developer makes
the following representations and warranties:
(1) The Developer is a Minnesota limited artnershi. has power to enter into this
P p� p
Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder and is not in violation of any provisions of
its articles, bylaws, partnership agreement or the laws of the State.
(2) The Developer will cause the Project to be installed in accordance with the terms
of this Agreement, the Development Program, and all applicable local, state and federal laws and
regulations (including, but not limited to, environmental, zoning, energy conservation, buildin
code, public health laws and,. regulations and the resolution relating to the Project adopted b the
p y
City Council on April 28, 2003).
(3) The construction of the Project would not be undertaken by the Developer, and in
the opinion of the Developer would not have been or be economically feasible within the
.reasonably foreseeable future, without the assistance and benefit to the Developer provided for in
p p
this Agreement.
1545693v1 S_4
12
(4) The Developer will use its best. efforts to obtain, or cause to be obtained, in a
timely manner, all required permits, licenses and approvals, and will meet, in a timely manner,
all requirements of all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations which must be
obtained or met before the balance of the Project may be lawfull constructed.
(5) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation . of the
transactions contemplated hereby, nor the fulfillment of or compliance. with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement is prevented, limited by or conflicts with or results in a breach of,
the terms, conditions or provision of any contractual restriction, evidence of indebtedness
agreement or instrument of whatever nature to which the Developer is now a party or by which it
is bound, or constitutes a default under any of the foregoing.
g
(6) The Developer will cooperate fully with the City with respect to any litigation
commenced with respect to the Project.
(7) The Developer will cooperate fully with the City in resolution of any traffic,
parking, trash removal or public safety problems that may arise in connection with the
construction and operation of the Project. - - - - - --
(S) The construction of the Project. will commence no later than ,
2003 and barring Unavoidable _Delays, the Project will be substantially completed by December
31, 2004.
1545693v1 S_5
13
ARTICLE III.
UNDERTAKINGS BY DEVELOPER AND CITY
Section 3.1 Land Acquisition and Site Improvements The parties agree that the
acquisition of the Development Property and the Site Improvements to be constructed b the
. Y
Developer are essential to the successful completion of the Project. The costs of the
Development property and the Site Improvements, which shall include engineering and all other
costs directly related to the making of the Site Improvements are estimated to be at least
$1 The costs of the acquisition of the Development Property and the Site
Improvements - shall be paid by the Developer. The City shall reimburse the Develop for the
lesser of $1,175,234 or costs of the acquisition of the Development Property and the Site
Improvement costs actually incurred _ and paid by the , as further p Developer, provided in Section
p
3.2 hereof.
Section 3.2 Reimbursement: Tax Increment Revenue Note. The City shall r eimburse
the payments made by the Developer under Section 3.1 for costs of the acquisition of the
Development Property and the Site Improvements through the issuance of the City's Tax
Increment Revenue Note in substantially the form attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C
subject to the following conditions:
(I). The Note shall be dated, issued and delivered when the Developer shall have
demonstrated in writing to the reasonable satisfaction of the City that the construction of the Site
Improvements has been completed and that the Developer has incurred and paid all costs of the
Site) Improvements, as described in and limited by Section 3.1.
(2) The unpaid principal amount of the Note shall bear simple, non - compounded
interest from the date of issuance of the Note, at 4.75% per annum. Interest shall be computed
p P
on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve (12) 30-day .months.
(3) The principal amounts of the Note and the interest thereon shall be payable solely
from the Tax Increments.
(4) The payment dates of the Note shall be the Note Payment Dates. The Developer
shall submit a statement to the City on or before each January 1 and July 1, commencing n
g
January 1, 2005, setting forth the principal amount of the Note and the accrued interest thereon
due on the following February 1 or Aug 1 as a ro riate shall include with the statement � PP P � e ent a
Compliance Certificate covering a period commencing on June 1 of the immediately preceding
calendar year and ending no later than December 1 of the same year or December - 1 of the
immediately preceding calendar year and ending no later than June 1 of the current year
(whichever is the most recent date prior to submission of the statement), and executed by the
Developer. On each Note Payment Date and subject to the provisions of the Note, the C i t y hall
tY
pay, against the principal and interest then due on the Note, any Tax Increments received by the
City ' during the preceding 6 months. All such payments shall first be applied to accrued and
unpaid interest on the Note and then to principal of the Note.
1545693v1 S -6
14
(5) Notwithstanding anything herein or in the Note to the contrary, the City shall be
under no obligation to apply or pay the Tax Increments to the payment of the Note any earlier
than 30 days after it has received the Developer's statement required by paragraph (4) above.
Failure of the Developer to submit the Developer's statement in the time frame required by
paragraph (4) above shall not prevent the Developer from obtaining the payment from the City
upon eventual submission of the required documents. Any interest accruing on Tax Increments
held by the City pending the Note Payment Dates or receipt of such statement from the
Developer shall accrue to the benefit of the City.
(6) The Note shall be a special and limited obligation of the City and not a general
obligation of the City, and only Tax Increments shall be used to pay the principal of and interest
on the Note. If, on any Note Payment Date, the Tax Increments for the payment of the accrued
and unpaid interest on the Note are insufficient for such purposes, the difference shall, be carried
forward, without interest accruing thereon, and shall be paid if and to the extent that on a future
Note Payment bate there are Tax Increments in excess of the amounts needed to pay the accrued
interest then due on the Note.
(7) The City's obligation to make payments on the Note on any Note Payment Date or
any date thereafter shall be conditioned upon the requirement that (A) there shall not at that time
be an Event of Default that has occurred and is continuing under this Agreement and (B) this
Agreement shall not have been rescinded pursuant to Section 4.2(b).
(8) The Note shall be governed by and payable pursuant to the additional terms
thereof, as set forth in Exhibit C. In the event of any conflict between the terms of the Note and
the terms of this Section 3.2, the terms of the Note shall govern. The issuance of the Note
pursuant and subject to the terms of this Agreement, and the takin gy � b the C of such additional
actions as bond counsel for the Note may require in connection therewith, are hereby authorized
and approved by the City.
Section 3.3 Compliance with Low and Moderate Income Requirements
(1) The City and the Developer understand and agree that the Tax Increment District
will constitute a "housing. district" under Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the Tax Increment Act.
Accordingly, in compliance with Section 469.1761, Subd. 3 of the Tax Increment Act, the
Developer agrees that the Project must satisfy the income requirements for a qualified residential
rental project as defined in Section 142(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. The City further
determines, in accordance with Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the Tax Increment Act, that certain
additional units that are not income- limited under Section 142(d) of the Internal Revenue Code
must meet income limitations imposed by the City as described herein. As a result, the p arties
agree that no more than 20% of the fair market value of the Project may be used for any purpose
other than low and moderate - income housing. The Developer must meet the above
requirements as follows:
(A) At least 50% of the residential units in the Project must be occupied or
available for occupancy by persons whose incomes do not exceed 50% of the Count
median income; and
1545693v1 S -7
15
(B) At least 30% of the residential units in the Project. must be. occupied or
available for occupancy to persons whose incomes do not exceed 110% of the County
median income.
The limits described in clauses (A) (B) must be satisfied commencing with the date
on which at least 10% of the units in the Minimum Improvements are occupied and continuing
through the Termination Date. Income for occupants of units described in clause (A) shall be
adjusted for family size in accordance with Section 142(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and
related regulations. Income for occupants of units described in clause (B) need not be adjusted
for family size, and shall be based upon the gross income for a family of four.
(2) On or before each January 1 and July 1, commencin g on Jul 1 2005 the
Y
Developer or an agent of the Developer must deliver or cause to be delivered to the City written
evidence satisfactory to the City of compliance with the covenants in this Section. This evidence
must include documentation of the household income of each of qualifying renter, a written
determination that each qualifying household income falls within the qualifying limits of
"this Section (and in the case of the q � g
units described in clause (1)(A) above, Section 142(d) of the
Internal Revenue Code), and certification that the income documentation is correct and accurate
(and, in the case of the units described in clause (1)(A) above, and that the determination of
qualification was made in compliance with Section 142(4) of the Internal Revenue Code In
dete compliance with this Section, the . Developer must use the County median incomes
for the year in which the payment is due on the Tax Increment Note as romul ated b the
p g Y
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency based on the area median incomes established by the United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
(3) The City acknowledges that the City is imposing the income limitations described
in clause (1)(B) on the Developer solely to comply with the -State Auditor's inte retation of
Section 469.174 Subd 11 of the Tax Increment Act. The City agrees that if Section 469.174
Subd. 11 - of the Tax Increment Act is subsequently interpreted by the State Auditor or a court of
competent jurisdiction or amended by the legislature in a manner - that would permit the City to
waive or modify these requirements without adversely affecting he legal status and qualification
g g
of the Tax Increment District, the City will enter into an agreement with the Developer amending
this Agreement to conform the Agreement to the minimum requirements imposed by Section
469.174, Subd. 11 of the Tax Increment Act, as interpreted or amended:
1545693v1 S_$
16
ARTICLE IV
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
Section 4.1 Events of Default Defined The following shall be "Events of Default"
under this Agreement and the term "Event of Default" shall mean whenever it is used in this
Agreement any one or more of the following events:
(1) Failure by . the Developer to timely pay any ad valorem real property taxes
assessed with respect to the Development Property.
(2) Failure by the Developer to cause the installation of the Project to be completed
pursuant to the terms, conditions and limitations of this Agreement.
(3) Failure ' of the Developer to observe or perform any other covenant, condition
obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement.
(4) The holder of any mortgage on the Development Property or any improvements
thereon, or any portion thereof, commences foreclosure proceedings as a result of any default
under the applicable mortgage documents.
(5) If the Developer shall:
(A) . file any petition in bankruptcy or for any reorganization, arrangement,
composition,- readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under the United
States Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended or under any similar federal or state law; or
(B) make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or
(C) admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due;
or
(D) be adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent; or if a petition or answer proposing
the adjudication of the Developer as a bankrupt or its reorganization under any present or
future federal bankruptcy act or any similar federal or state law shall be filed in an y court
and such petition or answer shall not be discharged or denied within sixty (60) days after
the filing thereof; or a receiver, trustee or liquidator of the Developer, or of the Project, or
part thereof, shall be appointed in any proceeding brought against the Developer, and
shall not be discharged within sixty (60) days after such appointment, or if the Developer,
shall consent to or acquiesce in such appointment.
Section 4.2 _ Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default refereed to in
Section 4.1 occurs and is continuing,_ the City, as specified below, may take any one or more of
the following actions after the giving of thirty (3 0) days' written notice to the Developer, but only
if the Event of Default has not been cured within said thirty (30) days:
1545693v1 S -9
17
(1) The City may suspend its performance under this Agreement until it receives
assurances from the Developer, deemed adequate by the City, that the Developer will cure its
default and continue its performance under this Agreement.
(2) The City may cancel and rescind the Agreement.
(3) The City may take any action, including legal or administrative action, in law or
equity, which may appear necessary or desirable to enforce performance and observance of any
obligation, agreement, or covenant of the Developer under this Agreement.
Section 4.3 No Remedy Exclusive No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to
the City is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but. each and
every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given
under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or
omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or
power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be
exercised from time to time and as omen as may be deemed expedient.
Section 4.4 No Implied Waiver In the event any agreement contained in this
Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by any other party, such
waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any
other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder.
.Section 4.5 A to Pay Attorney's Fees and Ex
penses Whenever any Event of
Default occurs and the City. shall employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of
payments due or to become due or for the enforcement or performance or observance of any
obligation or agreement on the part of the Developer herein contained, the Developer agrees that
it shall, on demand therefore, pay to the City the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other
expenses so incurred by the City.
Section 4.6 Indemnification of City
(1) The Developer releases from and covenants and agrees that the City, its governing
body members, officers, agents, including the independent contractors, consultants and legal
counsel, servants and employees thereof (hereinafter, for purposes of this Section, collectively
the "Indemnified Parties ") shall not be liable for and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the
Indemnified Parties against any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any
person occurring at or about or resulting from any defect in the Project, provided that the
foregoing indemnification shall not be effective for any actions of the Indemnified Parties that
are not contemplated by this Agreement.
(2) Except for any willful misrepresentation or any, willful or wanton misconduct of
the Indemnified Parties, the Developer agrees to protect and defend the Indemnified Parties, now
and forever, and further agrees to hold the aforesaid harmless from any claim, demand, suit,
action or other proceeding whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly
arising from the actions or inactions of the Developer (or other persons acting on its behalf or
1545693v1 S -10
IN
under its direction or control) under this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby or
the acquisition, construction, installation, ownership, and operation of the Project; provided, that
this indemnification shall not apply to the warranties made or obligations undertaken by the City
in this Agreement or to any actions undertaken by the City which are not contemplated b this
p Y.
Agreement but shall, in any event and without regard to any fault on the parr of the City, apply to
any pecuniary loss or penalty (including interest thereon from the date the loss is incurred or
penalty is paid by the City at a rate equal to the Prime Rate) as a result of the Developer
operating the Project so that the Tax Increment District does not. qualify or cease to qualify as a
"housing district" under Section 469.174, Subdivision 11, of the Act or to violate limitations as
to the use of Tax Increments as set forth in Section 469.176, Subdivision 4d.
(3) All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the City
contained herein shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, romises, agreements and
P �'
obligations of the I City and not of any governing body member officer, agent, servant or
employee of the City, as the case may be.
1545693v1 S -11
19
ARTICLE V
DEVELOPER' OPTION TO TERMINATE AGREEMENT
Section 5.1 The Developer's Option to Terminate This Agreement may be terminated
by Developer, if (i) the Developer is in compliance with all material terms of this Agreement and
no Event of Default has ' occurred; and (ii) the City fails to comply with any material term of this
Agreement, and, after written notice by the Developer of such failure, the City has failed to cure
such noncompliance within ninety (90) days of receipt of such notice, or, if such noncompliance
cannot reasonably be cured by the City within ninety (90) days, of receipt of such notice, the
City has not provided assurances, reasonably satisfactory to the Developer, that such
noncompliance will be cured as soon as reasonably possible.
.Section 5.2 Action to Terminate. Termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section
5.1 must be accomplished by written notification by the Developer to the City within thirty (30)
days after the date when such option to terminate may first be exercised. A failure by the
Developer to terminate this Agreement within such period constitutes a waiver by the Developer
of its rights to terminate this Agreement due to such occurrence or event.
Section 5.3 Additional Right to Terminate. In addition to Developer's right to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 5.1 above, Developer shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement at any time after completion of the Project by written notice to the
City.
Section 5.4 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this
Article V. this ' Agreement shall be from such date forward null and void and of no further effect;
provided, however, the termination of this Agreement shall not affect the rights of either party to
institute any action, claim or demand for damages suffered as. a result of breach or default of the
terms of this Agreement, by the other party, or to recover amounts which had accrued and
become due and payable as of the date of such termination. Upon termination of this Agreement
pursuant to this Article V, the Developer shall be free to proceed with the Project at its own
expense and without regard to the provisions of this Agreement; provided, however, that the City
shall have no further obligations to the Developer ' with respect to reimbursement of the expenses
set forth in Section 3.2, or to make any further payments on the Tax Increment Note.
1545693v1 S -12
20
ARTICLE VI
ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
Section 6.1 Restrictions on Use The Developer agrees for itself, its successors and
assigns and every successor in interest to the Development Property, or any part thereof, that
during the term of this Agreement the Developer and such successors and assigns shall operate
g
or cause to be operated, the Project as a multifamily housing facility and shall devote the
Development Property to, and in accordance with, the uses specified in this Agreement.
Section 6.2 Conflicts of Interest No member of the governing body or other official
of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the
Development Property or the Project, or any contract, agreement or other transaction
contemplated to occur or be undertaken thereunder or with respect thereto, ' nor shall' any such
member of the governing . body or other official participate in any decision relating to the
Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation,
partnership or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested. No member
official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the City in the event of any default
or breach by the Developer or successor or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.
Section 6.3 Titles of Articles and Sections Any titles of the several parts, articles and
sections of the Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be
disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions.
Section 6.4 Notices and Demands Except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement b an to an
�' Y Y p� Y
other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally, -and
(1) in the case of the Developer is addressed to or delivered personally to:
Sibley Cove, Limited Partnership
Minnesota
(2) in the case of the City is addressed to or delivered personally to the City Manager
at:
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109-2797
or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time,
designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section.
1545693v1 5 -13
21
Section 6.5 Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Section 6.6 Law Governing This Agreement will be . governed and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State.
Section 6.7 Expiration This Agreement shall expire on the earlier of August 1 2030
or the date on which the Tax Increment Note is paid in full, unless earlier terminated or rescinded
in accordance with its terms.
Section 6.8 Provisions Surviving Rescission or Expiration Sections 4.5 and 4.6 shall
survive any rescission, termination or expiration of this Agreement with respect to or arising out
of any event, occurrence or circumstance existing prior to the date thereof.
Section 6.9 Assi nment The Developer shall not assign its interest in this Agreement
or the Note without the consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
1545693v1 S -14
22
IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its
name and on its behalf and its seal to be hereunto duly wed, and the Developer has caused this
Agreement to be duly executed on its behalf, on or as of the date first above written.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Clerk
This is a signature page to the Development Agreement by and between the Cit y p of Maplewood
and Sibley Cove, Limited_ Partnership.
1545693v1 S -15
23
SIBLEY COVE, LMTED PARTNERSHIP
B
Its
This is a signature page to the Development Agreement by and between the City Maplewood
�' p
and Sibley Cove, Limited Partnership.
1545693v1 S -16
24
EYIUBIT A
Description of Development Property
Parcel ID #
022922120010
02292212.0009
022922210017
1545693v1 A -1
25
FORM OF TAX INCREAlENT NOTE
No. R -1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
TAX INCREMENT REVENUE
(SIBLEY COVE PROJECT)
The City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City'% , hereby acknowledges itself to. be
indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay the amounts hereinafter described ( the
"Payment Amounts ") to Sibley Cove, Limited Partnership, or its registered assigns (the
"Registered Owner "), but only in the manner, at the times, from the sources of revenue, and to
the extent hereinafter provided.
The principal amount of this Note shall equal from time to time the principal amount
stated above, as reduced to the extent that such principal installments shall have been paid in
whole or in part pursuant to the terms hereof; provided that the sum of the principal amount
listed above shall in no event exceed $1,175,234 as provided in that certain Development
Agreement, dated as of July , 2003, as the same may be amended from time to time the
"Development Agreement "), by and between the City and Sibley Cove, Limited Partnership.
The unpaid principal amount hereof shall bear interest from the date of this Note at the simple,
non - compounded rate of four and seventy -five hundredths percent (4.75 %) per annum. Interest
shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year consisting of twelve (12) 30 -day months.
The amounts due under this Note shall be payable on February 1, 2005, and on each
February 1 and August 1 thereafter to and including August 1, 2030, or, if the first should not be
a Business Day (as defined in the Development Agreement) the next succeeding Business Day
(the "Payment Dates "), provided, that such Payment Date shall be automatically extended if and
to the extent required to relieve the . City of any obligation to pay any Payment .Amount an
g PY
earlier than 30 days after it has received the statement and Compliance Certificate required under
Section 3.2(4) of the Development Agreement. On each Payment Date the City shall pay by
check or dram mailed to the person that was the Registered Owner of this Note at the close of the
last business day of the City preceding such Payment Date an amount equal to the Tax
Increments (hereinafter defined) received by the City during the six month period preceding such
Payment Date. All payments made by the City under this Note shall first be applied to accrued
pp
interest and then to principal.
1545693vi B -1
26
The Payment Amounts due hereon shall be payable solely from 90% of the tax
increments (the "Tax Increments ") from the City's Housing District No. 1 -8 (the "Tax Increment
District ") within its Municipal Development District No. 1 which are paid to the City and which
the City is entitled to retain pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174
through 469.179, as the same may be amended or supplemented from time to time (the "Tax
Increment Act "). This Note shall terminate and be of no further force and effect following the
last .Payment Date defined above, on any date upon which the City shall have terminated the
Development Agreement under Section 4.2(b) thereof or the Developer shall have terminated the
Development Agreement under Article V thereof, or on the date that all principal and interest
payable hereunder shall have been paid in full, whichever occurs earliest.
The City makes no representation or covenant, express or implied, that the Tax
Increments will be sufficient to pay, in whole or in part, the amounts that are or may become due
and payable hereunder.
The City's payment obligations hereunder shall be further conditioned on the fact that no
Event of Default under the Development Agreement shall have occurred and be continuing at the
time payment is otherwise due hereunder, but such unpaid amounts shall become p a Y able
without interest accruing thereon in the meantime, if said Event of Default shall thereafter have
been cured; and, further, if pursuant to the occurrence of an Event of Default under the
Development Agreement the City elects to cancel and rescind the Development Agreement, the
City shall have no further debt or obligation under this Note whatsoever. Reference is hereby
made to all of the provisions of the Development Agreement, including without limitation
Section 3.2 thereof, for a fuller statement of the rights and obligations of the City o the
Y pay
principal of this Note and the interest thereon, and said provisions are hereby incorporated into
this Note as though set out in full herein. This Note may be terminated or reduced as provided in
Section 3.2(9) of the Development Agreement.
This Note is a special, limited revenue obligation and not a general obligation of the City
and is payable by the City only from the sources and subject to the qualifications stated or
referenced herein. This Note is not a general obligation of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
and neither the full faith and credit nor the tag powers . of the City are pledged to the payment
of the principal of or interest on this Note and no property or other asset of the City, save and
except the above - referenced Tax Increments, is or shall be a source of payment of the City's
obligations hereunder.
This Note is issued by the City in aid of financing a o'ect pursuant to and in full
p J
conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including the Tax
Increment Act.
This Note may be assigned only with the consent of the City. In order to assign the Note,
the assignee shall surrender the same to the City either in exchange for a new fully registered
note or for transfer of this Note on the registration records for the Note maintained by the City.
Each permitted assignee shall take this Nate subject to the foregoing conditions and subject to all
provisions stated or referenced herein.
1545693v1 B -2
27
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED+ that all acts, conditions, and things
required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to have happened,
and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Note have been done, have
happened, and have been performed in regular and due form, time, and manner as required by
law; and that this Note, together with all other indebtedness of the City outstanding on the date
hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery, does not cause the indebtedness of the
City to exceed any constitutional, statutory or charter limitation thereon.
IN WITNESS WIiEREQF, City of Maplewood, Minnesota, by its City Council, has
caused this Note to be executed by the manual signatures of its Mayor and Clerk and has caused
this Note to be issued on and dated , 200 .
Clerk
1545693v1 B -3
W
Mayor
CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRATION
It is hereby certified that the foregoing Note, as originally issued on ,
200 was on said date registered in the name of Sibley Cove, Limited Partnership, and that, at
the request of the Registered Owner of this Note, the undersigned has this day registered the
Note in the name of such Registered Owner, as indicated in the registration blank below, on the
books kept by the undersigned for such purposes.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF DATE OF SIGNATURE OF
REG`rISTERED OWNERS R CITY CLERK
Sibley Cove, Limited Partnership , 200
Minnesota
1545693v1 B -4
29
EXHIBIT C
SITE IlVIPROVEMENTS
[Insert]
1545693v1
C.1
30
Ur: 1
COMPLIIANCE CERTIFICATE
The undersigned Sibley Cove, Limited Partnership, does hereby certify that as of the date
of this Certificate not less than 50% of the residential units in the Sibley Cove Project in
Maplewood, Minnesota (the "Project ") are occupied by individuals whose income is 50% or less
of the Ramsey County median income and not less than 30% of the residential units in the
Project are occupied by individuals whose income is 110% or less of the Ramsey County median
income.
Dated this day of , 200_.
SIBLEY COVE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
1545693v1 D -1
31
Attachment 5
85 E. SEVENTH PLACE, SUITE 100
SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 -2887
651- 223 -3000 FAX: 651- 223 -3002
MEMORANDUM
SPRINGSTED
Advisors to the Public Sector
TO: Melinda Coleman, Assistant City Manager, Maplewood
Dan Faust, Finance Director, Maplewood
FROM: . Paul T. Steinman, Vice President
DATE: July 7, 2003
SUBJECT: Sibley Cove TIF Analysis
The purpose of this memo is to validate the project's gap and recommend a maximum amount
of TIF assistance to make the project feasible.
Deal Structure — Sibley_ Cove
Sibley Cove is an affordable housing project consisting of 80 newly constructed apartment units
in a single story building. 50% of the units will be rent - restricted according to Minnesota
Housing Finance Authority (MHFA) guidelines. MHFA is the primary lender on the project.
The proposed financing is as follows:
• MHFA 1S Mortgage $ 4,733,982
• MHFA FFCC Loan 598
• Ramsey County HRA 500,000
• Tax Credit Owner Equity 2
• Tax Increment (GAP) 1,175,234
Total $9,686,004
Analms
In a market rate housing project when there are extraordinary costs such as underground
parking, exterior finish, and landscaping, the developer generally can increase financing to
cover such extra costs. MHFA, primary lender on Sibley Cove, considers additional costs when
determining financing amount, but concentrates primarily on the number of families the
proposed development will serve. .The number of families doesn't change whether or not the
project contains underground parking or additional landscaping. It is unlikely, once MHFA has
made their financing commitment to the project, that it will change based upon any proposed
gap.
We recommend the developer first forgo a portion of the development fee to minimize any
potential financing gap. The developer has indicated a deferral of its development fee will be
necessary to fund any shortfall between the present value of a tax increment subsidy, and the
. CORPORI4TE OFFICE: SAINT PAUL, MN + Visit our website at www.springsted.com
IOWA • KANSAS • MINNESOTA • VIRGINIA • WASHINGTON, DC • WISCONSIN
32
City of Maplewood
Sibley Cove TIF Analysis
Page 2
Y
$1,175,234 required to fill the financing gap. The developer anticipates selling the City's tax
increment note of $1,175,234, and receiving cash in return for it in the amount of about
$800,000, requiring the developer to defer its fee in the amount of $375,234.
The second issue is to verify that "but -for" tax increment, the project won't proceed. The
standard evaluation mechanism used in this analysis is to complete a side by side comparison
of market vs. affordable rental rates. to calculate the "cost" of keeping the units affordable. This
analysis is contained in the table below:
Monthly Monthly
Affordable Affordable Market Annual Annual
Units Rent Rent Affordable Market Difference
30 830 1. 298,800 387 88,200
6 959 1 69 86,760 17,712
4 959 1 46,032 66,288 20,256 Cumulative PV at
- Difference 6.5%
40
1 413,880 540,048 126,168 126,168 118,468
2 430,435 556,249 125,814 251 229,393
3 447 572,937 . 125,284 377,267 333,109
4 465,559 590,125 124,566 501,833 429,938
5 484;181 607 123 625 520,186
6 503,548 626,064 122,515 747,996 604,150
7 523 644,846 121,155 869,151 682,114
8 544,638 664,191 119,553 988,704 754,352
9 566,423. 684,117 117,693 1,106 821,125
10 589,080 704,640 115 1,221, 957 882,687
11 612,644 725,779 113,136 1 939,279
12 637,149 747 110,403 1,445,497 991,134
13 662,635 769,979 107,344 1,552,841 1,038
14 689,141 793 103 1,656 1
15 716,706 816,871 100,165 1 1,120,462
16 745,374 841,377 96,003 1 1,155
m.:, 4 •r ?W Y _ r n < . ayca, ' -Mm t� riq i O,
'tr.. f N"'� � .( .�..�ft'• � �
n wa .r ¢ ..
18 806,197 892,617 86,420 2 1
19 838,445 919 80,951 2,111, 746 .1, 239,139
20 871 946 74 2,186,741 1
21 906,862 975 68,525 2,255,266 1
22 943,137 1 61 2,316, 777 1
23 980,862 1, 034, 788 53,926 '2 1,306,743
24 1 1 45 2 1
25 1,060,900 1. 097, 806 36,906 2 1 7
The purpose of the table is to measure the point at which the resent value is near) e #
p Y q o
the gap of $1,175,234 proposed to be funded with tax increment. The table shows that there is
a "cost" to the developer of keeping the project affordable of $1,186,855 after 17 years. It is
likely that without tax increment to cover this gap, the project will not roceed as planned.
P p
The table below shows another primary component of this analysis, which is the t
p Y offal amount of
tax increment projected to be generated by the project.
33
City of Maplewood
Sibley Cove TIF Analysis
Page 3
Projected Tax Increment Report
Annual
Annual
Period
Gross Tax
Ending
Increment
1
2
(3)
(4)
Less:
Less:
State Aud.
Admin.
Deduction
Retainage
0.360%
10.00%
(3)
(4)
12131/03
P.V.
Annual
Annual
Net
Net Rev. To
Revenue
01/01/04
(5)
4.75%
12131/03
0
0
0
0
0
12/31/04
0
0
0
0
0
12131/05
93,168
335
9
83,550
77,033
12/31/06
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
73,540
12/31/07
93,168
335
9
83,550
70,205
12/31/08
93
335
9
83
67
12/31/09
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
63,982
12/31/10
93,168
335
9
83
61,081
12/31/11
93
335
9,283
83
58,311
12/31/12
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
55,667
12131/13
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
53,143
12131/14
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
50,733
12/31/15
93,168
335
9,283
83
48,432
12/31/16
93
335
9,283
83
46
12131/17
93,168
335
9,283
83
44
12/31/18
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
42
12/31/19
93,168
335
-9,
83,550
40,227
12/31120
93,168
335
9
83,550
38,403
12/31/21
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
36
12131/22
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
34
" 12131 /23
93,168
335
9
83
33,412
12/31/24
93,168
335
9
83,550
31,897
1 2131 /25
93
335
9
83,550"
30,451
12/31/26
93,168
335
9
83550
29
12/31/27
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
27
12/31/28
93,168
335
.9,283
83,550
26
12/31/29
93,168
.335
9,283
83
25,292
12/31/30
93,168
335
9,283
83,550
24,145
12/31/31
0
0
0
0
0
$2,422,368
$8,710
$241,358
$2,172,300
$1,190
The far right column
indicates the present value (PV) of the projected future increment stream,
totaling $1,190,466 after 26 years,
The key issue is
to compare the
PV increment stream with
the gap of $1,175,234 to determine if there is projected to be enough increment to cover such
gap. The analysis shows it will take a full 25 years of increment to cover
the proposed financing
gap of $1,175,234.
It should be noted that one of the primary assumptions used in the tax increment analysis is that
the market value of the project never increases. Although such a conservative approach is
generally recommended, it does not represent what has occurred with market values over the
past years for this type of product. A market value inflation rate will increase the amount of tax
34
City of Maplewood
Sibley Cove TIF Analysis
Page 4
increment generated over time in the district, allowing the district to potentially be decertified
early. If we assume even a small market value inflation rate of 3 %, it is projected to take only
18 years for the district to generate enough tax increment to cover the financing gap. of
$1,175
Conclusion
Through our analysis we have verified the projected gap of $1,175,234. It is recommended that
the development agreement include the provision of a tax increment note to the developer in the
principal amount of $1,175,234 at an interest rate of 4.75 %. The development agreement will
specify that when the principal amount of the note is reached, the subsidy will end and the TIF
district will be decertified. This provides for the opportunity, given even a modest market value
inflation of 3 %, that only 18 years of increment might be necessary to cover the projected
financing gap.
Action
Should the Council choose to approve the tax increment subsidy to the developer, the action
may be as follows:
"Authorize execution of a development agreement with Sibley Cove .Limited Partnership
providing a tax increment note in_ the principal amount of $1,175,234 carrying an interest
rate of 4.75/0."
35
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM:' Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
s
D;� 4.
L
EF
..` _-
SUBJECT: Environmental Utility Fund for Surface Water Management — Receive SW.
Call Public - - -..
blic Hearing to Consider Establishment of Utility and Fee
DATE: July 8, 2003
Introduction
The 2003 budget included an appropriation for services to implement a permit application to meet federal
requirements for storm water management. That permit application was submitted to the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) on March 1 Q 2003. The requirements to meet the federal permit for
storm water management included numerous tasks that are not currently funded. The city council
established a goal in March 2003 to identify and explore new funding sources. Authorization was
provided earlier in 2003 to investigate an Environmental /Surface Water Utility charge to property owners
as a permanent dedicated funding source to meet the permit requirements. A special report on the
Environmental Utility Fund for Surface Water Management has been prepared and is ready for
presentation to the city council. Receipt of the report and calling of a public hearing to consider
establishment of the utility and fee charge is recommended.
Background
The Federal Clean Water Act of 1991 required that all discharges of storm water acquire a Nationwide
Pollution Discharge Elimination Source (NPDES) permit. The act required all cities that exceed 100,000
in population to acquire their permits within seven years, while cities in excess of 10,000 persons (Phase
II cities) were given 12 years. The NPDES process in Minnesota will be administered by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA established March 10, 2003, as the date that Phase II
cities must submit a Notice of Intent for the permit application and afive -year Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) started a process in October 2002
with 73 communities (mainly cities) to develop a guide plan that assists cities in their application. The city
council approved a joint powers agreement with LMC in October 2002 that began the permit application
process. In January 2003 the city council authorized preparation of the notice of intent (NOI) with specific
storm water activities documenting that the City of Maplewood will meet the Clean Water Act
requirements. A budget of $60,000 was established in January 2003 for this plan preparation.
The storm water activities will require additional expenses to the city to meet the permit requirements.
The additional tasks will include a more extensive maintenance of the storm water /surface water system,
additional environmental features to treat surface water runoff prior to discharge, a more comprehensive
street sweeping program, a wetland enhancement program and an educational component for public
involvement in surface water management. Each of these tasks will require additional ublic funding. A
p g
dedicated source of funding that many surrounding communities (Roseville, Oakdale, N. St. Paul, St.
Paul, Woodbury, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights etc.) have implemented is a utility charge to property
owners, called a storm water or environmental /surface water utility charge. This system administers the
charge, similar to the sanitary sewer utility, to each property.' A single family home is typically the base
g Y Yp Y
charge and rates vary from $1.58 per month to $5.00 per month (Page 32 of attached Special Report)
p )
throughout the metro area. It is proposed that Maplewood explore a single - family home month) charge
e g
of $1.75. This will provide the city with annual revenues of approximately $1,000,000 to use toward the
Environmental Utility Funding program activities. Further details are included in the attached report.
}l
City Cou►,ncil Agenda Background
Environmental Utility Fund
July 8, 2003
Page Two
Schedule
The following schedule is recommended for the city council to consider the utility fee concept:
Council Considers Special Report and Calls Hearing July 14, 2003
Web Page .Article Posted July 28, 2003
City News Article Received by Homeowners August 1, 2003
Public Information Open House Hosted by City Staff August 7, 2003 (6:30 pm)
Council Holds Public Hearing and Considers 1S Reading August 11 3 2003
Council Conducts 2n Reading and Authorizes Publication of
Ordinance Establishing Utility Fee August 25, 2003
Utility Fee Becomes Effective October 1, 2003
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council receive the Special Report on the Environmental Utility for
Surface Water Management and call a Public Hearing for August 11, 2003 at 7:30 pm to consider
the first reading of the ordinance establishing the Utility Fee.
RCA
jW
Attachments: Special Report on Environmental Utility
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT Action by Council
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer
Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer �4
ReJecte
SUBJECT: Hazelwood Street Improvements p ements (County Road C to Beam Ave. ), City Project 01 -16 —
Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids
DATE: July 7, 2003
Introduction
Final plans and specifications for the above referenced project have been completed by the city's
consultant, TKDA, and are ready to -be advertised for bids. The city council will consider approving the
plans and advertising for bids.
The proposed bid opening for this project is scheduled for 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, August 6, 2003.
Award of bids would be considered by the city council at the August 11, 2003, city council meeting.
Background
For most projects, the assessment roll and assessment hearing would be ordered at the same time bids
are authorized. However, based on the proposal approved by the city council on May 12, 2003, to defer
the residential assessments for five years without interest, staff recommends that the assessment
hearing does not need to be held at this time.
It is recommended that the assessment hearing be held at a later date this fall after the project has
been bid and construction is underway. Staff is investigating the proper procedures required to levy the
assessments with the first payment for the residential properties due in January 2009. Delaying the
assessment hearing to later this fall will have little financial impact on the project since the residential
assessments will be deferred and based on the fact that the majority of the. project will be funded from
state aid.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution Approving Plans and
Advertising for Bids for the Hazelwood Street Improvements (County Road C to Beam Ave.), Cit
Project 01 -16.
CIVIC
jW
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids
1535
---------------- ----------- -------------------
--- ---------
--------------------------- =�--
— — --- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ------ — — — — — — — — — — —
M3
1650
------- --- .a,.:
�.�. �, �:,..�,...
2M
�' a..w.:;,,�...�,,,. ,...., ..,...�.A � �
1410 141
2685 682
2679
El
2676
-T
!-
Ail.
Q
ztl
2673 2670
;�;O 'An
2813
2667 2664
267'
2785
2674
2661 CO 2658
tvJ
2655 52
2777
2664
1 1 n
t
2767
WI M
2766i:4 T
. . . . . . . . . .
2643 0
1403
— — ....... .... ..:..........n,,.,.....
1411
-.1 — — —
1415 1477 1495
— — .- -.- -.. — - . — — - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------
-----------
1386
1396
1406
141
-
m
2 7A 43,
747 tv
DL
.2737 il
S 1448
3 11
1 0
2727 R
------- --- .a,.:
�.�. �, �:,..�,...
2M
�' a..w.:;,,�...�,,,. ,...., ..,...�.A � �
1410 141
2685 682
2679
El
2676
0A.1
2673 2670
2667 2664
267'
2674
2661 CO 2658
tvJ
2655 52
2664
1 1 n
2649 CU 2646
. . . . . . . . . .
2643 0
1403
— — ....... .... ..:..........n,,.,.....
1411
-.1 — — —
1415 1477 1495
— — .- -.- -.. — - . — — - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------
-----------
1386
1396
1406
141
m
DL
S 1448
3 11
2690
N ',
2680
268 2682
267 G) 2678
(D
Hazelwood Park
'(�,2670
2669
265
2661 2660
21
,.a
1585 15819,
%.'.1 559 1663
J-A 2653
w ..,...—. . —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — I,
1530 8 1632 1662 1674 1686 1700 1708
CD
CDi
2915
2T
2610
26
2607
[
2606
4 L:j 1v,
17. 260
26 ZN111
2601
26
R-774
25r 2M3
2591
1�7 250 259i��
2588
2581-j
259
2575
25-4 &75 2 5
2 r
_Ln-I 1 2567 2570
25W 2561 i
2 F:::-"1559 f 255i�
p
IL-j-
—, 1551
Lr�cc� +ror, MAP s of -r r c
269712694
US
L
plih
1519
RESOLUTION
APPROVING PLANS
ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on May 12, 2003, plans and
specifications for Hazelwood Street Improvements (County Road C to Beam Ave.), City Project 01 -16,
have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such plans and
specifications to the council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy p of which are attached hereto and made a art
hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on .file in the office of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the
Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such
approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before
the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that b,ids will be publicly
opened and considered by the council at 10:00 a.m. on the 6th day of August, 2003, at the city hall and
that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified
check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such
bid.
3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open,
and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The
council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of August
11, 2003.
AGENDA ITEM ' `S
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager c
FROM: Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer
Erin Schacht, Civil Engineer 1
E
SUBJECT: Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, City Project 02 -10:
Resolution for Modification of the Existing Construction Contract, Chk �6: 7M
DATE: July 7, 2003
Introduction /Summary
During construction there are often unforeseen changes from the original plans and specifications.
The city council will consider approving the attached resolution directing the modification of the
existing construction contract.
Background
The changes described in this change order (CO #1, $6,330.19) are for changes in the scope of
sanitary sewer service work from what was initially planned.
Budget Impact
Approval of this resolution would increase the construction contract by $6,330.19; however, these
expenses will fall within the original project budget. These costs will be entirely funded from the
sewer utility fund and have no impact on the general fund. A final project reconciliation will
reapportion funding based on the cost of work.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution Directing the
Modification of the Existing Construction Contract for the Kennard /Frost Area Street
Improvement Project, City Project 02 -10.
EMS
jW
Attachments: Location Map
Resolution
Change Order No. 1
i w � v�
LAURIE RD.
0
=SAN1HURST
z
� �KE AVE.
M
ELDR IDGE AVE.
. BELMONT LN. °
0
0
::KILLMAN AVE. w
S
Q �� Q LAURIE Q RD. w J c� � ��
:2 Sherwoodz � J Y w Q �
of Park z cn AVE o Q v � cf
� �
CO. R.D. > 6 v
BURKE AVE. ' Z
�P
Community
John Glenn
64 65 Center
\L
CA TF City i
HARRIS AVE.
ROSEWOOD AVE. N
K ood
Park �1
RY AN A
c Q v ' �
AVE. :
FF
g
� = m W
W 0
D
— Z
r :2 �G Wakefield
Lake
A
PRICE Pv •`� �
CD LARPENTEUR �
n64 17,
OSEW00
AVE. S. �
con
O AP
MSEY COUNTY
SING HOME AND
k A/R GROUNDS
,� 28
SU MMER AVE. �
J
J
O
Z p
Y �
Q Z
� Z
W
Y
D Of
Q
o m N KINGSTON
Z J
g � Q PRICE AVE.
2 W U
Y z
D 30 N
z
Project location
no scale
� > : - ^:\ '` �}\1- L: _ �'i f
^ �. I Y.f;' 0
Exhibit 1
Project Location
Kennard /Frost Area Improvement 02 -10
ALDRICH GOODRICH
w GOLF
J
0 COURSE�?'��
w
ARENA z ��
Q
> 15 Go
RIPLEY AVE
,� 28
SU MMER AVE. �
J
J
O
Z p
Y �
Q Z
� Z
W
Y
D Of
Q
o m N KINGSTON
Z J
g � Q PRICE AVE.
2 W U
Y z
D 30 N
z
Project location
no scale
� > : - ^:\ '` �}\1- L: _ �'i f
^ �. I Y.f;' 0
Exhibit 1
Project Location
Kennard /Frost Area Improvement 02 -10
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 02 -10, Ken -nard /Frost Area Street Improvements and has let a
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and
designated as Improvement Project 02 -10, Change Order No. 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 1 in the
amount of $6,330.19. The revised contract amount is $2,212,442.47.
No revisions to the project budget are required at this time, as these
changes fall within the original project budget.
CHANGE ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Project Name: Kennard Frost Area Street Improvement Project Change Order No.: 1
Project No.: 02 -10 Date: 6 -23 -03
Contractor: T.A. Schifsky &Sons, Inc.
The following changes shall be made in the contract documents: (Work not covered under
contract)
Unit
Description Unit Quantit Price Total
Time and Materials to replace EA 1 $2,218.72 $2,218.72
wye &riser for 1950 Flandrau St.
Time and Materials to replace EA 1 $4,111.47 $4,111.47
Wye &riser for 1944 & 1947
Flandrau St.
TOTAL $6,330.19
Original Contract: $2,206,112.28
Net Change of Prior Change
Order No. 1 to No. 1 : $6,330.19
Change This Change Order: $6,330.19
Revised Contract: $2,212,442.47
Approved
Recommended
Agreed to by Contractor by
Its
ay r
E ineer
Lk
Title
f
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT ,_���
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager * r
FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Y g �w
Reject
SUBJECT: Legacy Parkway, Kennard to Southlawn, City Project 03 -26: Resolution Ordering
../
. g
Preparation of Preliminary Report
DATE: July 7, 2003
Introduction /Summary
The proposed site plan for the Legacy Village at Maplewood includes the construction of an east
to west roadway between Kennard Street and Southlawn Drive. The financial planning for the
project requires that this project be considered, which requires initiating the project by approving
the attached resolution ordering the preparation of the feasibility study.
Background
As part of the overall site, improvements, the city will provide design and construction inspection
services, as well as award a construction contract for the improvement of Legacy Parkway
g Y Y
between the extension of Kennard Street and Southlawn Drive. Cost of the improvement will be
borne mainly by the site developer. The roadway will provide access to the assisted living
facility, the corporate site, the public wetland park, as well as an internal roadway reliever for
site- generated traffic to access the Maplewood Mall area.
This project would consist of approximately 0.25 miles of street reconstruction and drainage
improvements, including construction of the large drainage improvements necessary to protect
the site wetlands. Authorization to proceed with the preliminary report is recommended.
Budget Impact
The estimated cost of the preliminary report preparation is $25,000. A consultant engineer
selected by the city engineer will prepare the report. The study cost will be paid as part of the
project funding. If the project is eventually ordered, assessments will cover these costs.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering
preparation of a preliminary report for the Legacy Parkway Improvements (Kennard to
Southlawn), Project 03 -26, and authorize the finance director to transfer $25,000 to the
project fund.
Attachment: Resolution
Site Map
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to Legacy Parkway, , Kennard
to Southlawn, City Project 03 -26, and to assess the benefited properties for all or a
portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and
that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising he
. i g
council n a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost
rY
effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in
connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement
as recommended.
are
FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $25,000 are appropriated to pre
. . p
this feasibility report.
�l VEC � w
l/C U U;C
Lj t� C 7)-
COUNTY ROAD G
1 i
��/ :::% / -fir ---- -� �- i- ` �-- 1, • �' (�'j ' I TIVE 1� ,' r l[TTMI :! ii ► .i !! ! !
_ 1 ,
p +io I ! °AE.— AIL !DIVA .�R' _!AL 1 P, ! ! i i i E ! i I i
\ _V.r_q EaVAT." W.: I'll C 1 � � 9 1 c i 1 i i 1 1 1 l i f i l l I i
— 'R'ETIAND BUFFER � � \ � � j
` 1,76 ACRE \ I , —__ F
RNITURE J
\ i {25' AVG20' WN. "NO TOUCH' �f j �� C I !
10' 70 BLOG.) �\ 1 G
�. ENT 11 i i U� =� !
• `' J i % -- a 44,080 SF I s
9, 17, 01
Lega%,. Village at M
Maplewood, - Minnesota
PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN
June 9, 2003
0 100 200 400
1 inch = 200 fL.
Hartford Group Inc.
Axchittects/Engineets/Planners
12100 Singlelree Lane, Eden Prairie, W55344
Wo
MWID A
AGENDA REPORT Act by Council
Date
T« City Manager Richard Fursman -
From: Chief of Police David Thomalla nd Fire Chief Steve L i �
Datee 7/312003
Rey 800 MHz Funding Resolution
Introduction
Maplewood Public Safety departments have been exploring converting the City's emergency
communications system to an 80OMHz system to improve interoperability between and within agencies
and departments. Funding sources have become available to Ramsey County and the City of
Maplewood to enhance the 800 MHz system in Ramsey County and purchase needed equipment.
Background
Ramsey County has asked for the support of each municipality in the County in their pursuit of State
and Federal Grant money to erect towers and install necessary equipment within the borders of
Ramsey County to provide an 800 MHz system capable of meeting the needs of local public safety
departments. A minimally equipped system is already in place but can only provide coverage to mobile
radios in operation outdoors. Local public safety requires a system capable of penetrating buildings
with radio waves to provide communications for employees within an urban environment. This build -
out will create a subsystem in the east metro area capable of extended communications.
In an effort to take advantage of the build -out of the 800 MHz system, Maplewood Public Safety
departments would like to become part of the system and take advantage of the interoperability
capabilities of this system. To utilize the system, Maplewood would have to upgrade the consoles in
the communications center, purchase and install a microwave link, and purchase new portable and
mobile radios for use in the field.
Money for this conversion has been requested in the 2006 -2007 CIP Budget. Receipt of currently
available funds could pay for 50 -75% of this project, reducing the cost to the City by up to $600,000. A
July 24, 2003 deadline for expressing the City's commitment is required to apply for the appropriated
funds. This may require a revision in the CIP expenditure to complete the project.
Recommendation
Approve the resolution expressing the City of Maplewood's support of participation in the regional 800
MHz system and in support of Ramsey County's willingness to build a subsystem to serve all agencies
within Ramsey County.
Action required
Submit to the city Council for review and action
Attachment
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF
PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL 800MHz SYSTEM
WHEREAS, The City of Maplewood has been reviewing the needs of the radio
communication system that provides emergency services to police, fire, and
emergency medical agencies in its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Radio Board, as a result of legislative changes, has
the authority and resources to provide financial assistance to local units of government
in the metropolitan area that plan to participate in the regional 800 MHz digital trunked
communication system; and
WHEREAS, Special legislative authority has been given to Minnesota counties to
issue bonds for the purpose of designing, constructing, and installing the
infrastructure, facilities, and equipment necessary to participate in the regional system;
and
WHEREAS, Federal funds have been appropriated and made available through
the Minnesota Department of Public Safety to supplement local and state funds for the
purpose of participating in the regional system, for which metropolitan area local
governments are eligible; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of Maplewood has determined that its participation in
the regional system would improve its interoperability among its various agencies and
with other jurisdictions for purposes of mutual aid and emergency medical services,
thus improving public safety, as well as the entire region's ability to respond to
weapons of mass destruction incidents; Now, Therefore, Be It
RESOLVED, That the City Council of the City of Maplewood intends to proceed
with planning for development of an upgraded radio communication system with the
intention of participating in the regional system and that the Metropolitan Radio Board
be. notified of the City of Maplewood's intention and request any state or federal
financial incentives that may be offered to local jurisdictions.