HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002 01-28 City Council PacketMAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, January 28, 2002
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 02 -02
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting from January 14, 2001 (02 -02)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one
motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Conditional Use Permit Review - Midwest Auto Works (2525 White Bear Avenue)
3. Conditional Use Permit Review - Equity Car Sales (2525 White Bear Avenue)
4. Acceptance of Donation - Maplewood Lioness Club
5. Human Relations Commission- Reappointments
6. Ramsey County Fair Board - Allocation of Funds
7. Joint Powers Agreement with City of Oakdale for Aquatic Services
8. Parks and Recreation Commission Appointments
9. Approval of Purchase of Staff Vehicle -Fire Department
10. Sewer Backup Damages (1439 Sherren Avenue East)
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. English Street Improvements, Project 01 -14
Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 Votes)
2. 7:20 P.M. County Road D Improvements, Project 01 -15
Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4,Votes)
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. New Fire Truck
i
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Project 01 -11, Consider Budget Adjustment for Mall Traffic Study
2. Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) Ordinance Amendment (Second Reading)
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Application for Permit - Currency Exchange Business
2. Tax Forfeit Property- Lakewood Drive North of Brenwood Circle
3. Metropolitan Council - Riverview Corridor Appointments
4. 2002 City Council Appointments
5. Adult Use License Approval
6. Project 02 -04, Receive Petition Request and Authorize Preparation of Preliminary Report for Lift
Station Relocation at Maple Hills Development
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Council Staff Retreat
2.
3.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this service must be made at
least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make arrangements. Assistant Listening Devices are also
available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is
hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone s opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when
appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another,
keep emotions in check and use respectful language.
AGWArnM
DRAFT--MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, January 14, 2002 Action by Council
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 02 -01 Date
Endorsed
A. CALL TO ORDER: Mode
Re1ected
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal Building, and was
called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B.
E.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Council Workshop Minutes of December 17, 2001,
meeting 01-30 as presented.
Councilmember Wasiluk seconded.
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Collins, Koppen and Wasiluk
Abstain - Councilmember Juenemann
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
L1 Mobile Home Park Owners Association
MI Maplewood School Closings
M2 Cable Commission
M3 Partnership
M4 League of Local Government
N1 Web Page Announcement
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the agenda as amended.
Councilmember Wasiluk seconded. Ayes -All
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
None
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
1
G. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Consent Agenda items as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember. Wasiluk Ayes -All
1. Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS
Tl ATTATIT T
$58,798.97 Checks #56284 thru #56285 dated 12/11/01
$282,963.13 Checks #56286 thru #56351 dated 12/14 thru 12/18/01
$93,778.01 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated
12/7 thru 12/17/01
$145,792.46 Checks #56352 thru #56353 dated 12/17 thru 12/20/01
$230,515.16
Checks #56354 thru #56424 dated 12/26/01
$122,595.35
Disbursements via debits to checking account dated
12/14 thru 12/21/01
$63,510.61
Checks #56425 thru #56465 dated 12/31/01
$158
Disbursements via debits to checking account dated
12/21 thru 12/31/01
$99,
Checks #56466 thru #56470 dated 1/2/02
$481,246.76
Checks #56471 thru #56545 dated 1/8/02
$
Disbursements via debits to checking account dated
12/28/01 thru 1/07/02
$3,386,269.05
Tl A T TTl !1T T
Total Accounts Payable
$362,146.84
$27
$363,299.72
$29,396.11
$781
$4,168,265.71
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 12/21/01
Payroll Deduction checks #87083 thru #87087 dated
12/21/01
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 1/4/02
Payroll Deduction checks #87269 thru #87275 dated
1/4/02
Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
2. Donation to DARE Program
Accepted a $50 donation for the DARE Program from Hill- Murray High School, 2625
Larpenteur Avenue East, Maplewood.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
2
3. National Night Out Award
Accepted the plaque from the National Association of Town Watch and that the employees and
groups who participated in the 2001 National Night Out program be recognized their help in
making the event a success.
4. Purchase of Patrol Vehicles
Authorized the purchase of four 2002 Ford Crown Victoria squad cars at a cost of $20, 736 each.
5. Donation to Police Department
Accepted a $3000 donation from Schmelz Countryside Volkswagen -Saab to be used as needed
by the Police Department to continue to make the community a safe place.
6. Upgrades for Paramedic Equipment
Authorized purchase of four monitor /defibrillator upgrades for the Police Department at a cost of
$19,995.
7. Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board Reappointments
Reappointed Mr. Ledvina, Ms. Fischer, and Mr. Ahlness to serve on the planning commission for
another three years with terms ending on December 31, 2004. Reappointed Mr. Shankar and Mr.
Jorgenson to serve on the community design review board for another two years with terms
ending on December 31, 2003.
8. Conditional Use Permit Review - Lexus (3000 Highway 61 North)
Approved to review the conditional use permit for the Lexus automobile dealership at 3 000
Maplewood Drive again in one year.
9. Conditional Use Permit- Mounds Park Academy (2051 Larpenteur Avenue)
Approved to review the conditional use permit for Mounds Park Academy at 2051 Larpenteur
Avenue again in one year.
10. Conditional Use Permit -APT Telecommunications Monopole (1300 Gervais Avenue)
Approved to review the conditional use permit for the telecommunications monopole at 1300
Gervais Avenue again in one year.
11. Pet Licenses - Prorate and Adjust Fee
Approved the $3.00 reduction for a pet license if the animal is sprayed or neutered. Approved
the $15.00 fee ($12.50 is sprayed or neutered) for the 2002 Pet license, which will be good for
ten months and expire on December 31, 2002.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Carefree Villas (Gervais Avenue)
Land Use Plan Change (R -1 to R -3 (H)) (4 Votes)
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
Lot Division
Design Approval
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Associate Planner Ken Roberts presented the specifics of the report.
C. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report.
d. Boardmember Ledvina presented the Community Design Review Board report
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following
persons were heard:
Bruce Mogren, Mogren Development Company, 1801 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood
Jean Doyle, 1801 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood
Will Rossbach, 13 86 Country Road C East, Maplewood
Bob Zick, 1880 E. Shore Drive, Maplewood
Bruce Mogren, Second Appearance
f. . Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolutions changing the land use plan
from R -1 ( single dwelling residential) to RH ( residential high density) for the 12 town house
units of the Carefree Villas of Maplewood (Resolution 02 -01 -001
RESOLUTION 02 -01 -001
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE
WHEREAS, Bruce Mogren applied for a change to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single
dwellings) to R -3H (residential high density).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property located on the north side of
Gervais Avenue between the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phases I and II) and the house at
1733 Gervais Avenue.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1 . On December 17, 2001 the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a
hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The
planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The planning commission recommended that the city council deny the plan amendment.
2. On January 14, 2002, the city council discussed the land use plan changes. They considered reports
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described changes
for the following reasons:
1 . This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for high- density residential use. This
includes being next to existing high- density senior housing units, a collector street and is near two
churches, shopping and Four Seasons Park.
2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
a. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values.
b. There would be no traffic from this development on existing residential streets.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All (4 Votes)
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution 02 -01 -002, approving an
conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Carefree Villas, based on the
finding required by code:
RESOLUTION 02 -01 -002
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, Bruce Mogren applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the Carefree Villas (Phase IV)
planned unit development (PUD).
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the undeveloped property on the north side of Gervais Avenue between
the existing Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phases I and 111) and the house at 1733 Gervais Avenue. The
legal description is:
The North 125 feet of the South 300 feet of the West 100 feet of Lot 2, E.G. Rogers' Garden Lots,
and also; the East 10 feet of the West 100 feet of the South 175 feet of Lot 2, E.G. Rogers' Garden Lots, all
in Section 10, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. And
Except the West 100 feet, the South 300 feet of Lot 2, E.G. Rogers' Garden Lots in Section 10,
Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1 . On December 17, 2001 the planning commission recommended that the city council deny this permit.
2. On January 14, 2002, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing
a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use
permit, because:
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
5
1 . The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1 . All construction shall follow the plans dated November 26, 2001, except where the city requires
changes. Such changes shall include revising the grading and site plans to show the additional
parking spaces and the required sidewalk along Gervais Avenue. The city council may approve
major changes to the plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or
the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The owner shall not convert the town houses in this development to non - seniors housing without
the revision of the planned unit development. For this permit, the city defines seniors housing as a
residence occupied by persons that are 55 years of age or older.
4. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers at or around the
townhouses.
5. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day -to -day
transportation on the town house site.
6. If the city council decides there is not enough on -site parking after the town houses are
occupied, the city may require additional parking.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
D
7. The developer or builder will pay the city Park Access Charges (PAC fees) for each housing unit
at the time of the building permit for each housing unit.
8. The three single dwellings are exempt from reviews for conditional use permit revisions for any
expansions, additions or changes provided that such changes would meet all applicable zoning and
building standards and requirements.
9. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the lot split creating four parcels for the Carefree Villas
development on Gervais Avenue. This lot division shall be subject to the developer or applicant completing
the following conditions before the city approves the lot division deeds:
1. The developer or owner recording drainage and utility easements along all existing and new
. property lines, subject to the approval of the city engineer.
2. The developer or owner recording cross easement and access agreements for Parcel A to have
access to Gervais Avenue across the adjacent property (the existing Carefree Cottages).
3. Signing an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and
meet all city requirements.
b. Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
C. Provide all required and necessary easements (including ten -foot drainage and utility
easements along the front and rear lot lines of each lot and five -foot drainage and utility
easements along the side lot lines of each lot).
d. Pay the city for the cost of any traffic- control, street identification and no parking signs.
e. Install a sign where the new driveway intersects Gervais Avenue indicating that it is a
private driveway.
f. Provide for the repair of Gervais Avenue (street, curb and gutter and boulevard) after the
developer connects to the public utilities and builds the private driveway.
g. Pay the costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans.
4. Changing the proposed lot division as follows:
a. Dedicate drainage and utility easements along all property lines. These easements shall be
pedestrian and utility easements in the front and shall be ten feet wide, shall be ten feet
wide along the rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
7
b. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer.
c. For the lots fronting on Gervais Avenue, the east lot shall be at least 9,500 square feet and
the west shall be at least 10,000 square feet.
5. Secure and provide all required easements for the development. These shall include any off -
site drainage and utility easements, subject to the city engineer's requirements.
6. Record the following with the lot division deeds:
a. All homeowners association documents.
b. An access agreement for the proposed town houses that ensures the tenants may use
the existing driveway(s) for ingress and egress.
The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for
approval before recording to assure there will be one responsible party for the maintenance
of the common areas, private utilities, driveways and structures.
7. The city will not issue building permits until the deeds for the town house site and the three
single dwelling lots are recorded and the developer has met the city conditions.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans (Site and Landscaping) dated November 26, 2001,
and the,building elevations (dated November 26, 2001) for the Carefree Villas of Maplewood. The city
bases this approval on the findings required by the code:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit:
a. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include the grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, sidewalk and driveway and
parking lot plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions:
(1). The erosion control plan shall be consistent with city code.
(2) The final grading plan shall include:
(a) Building, floor elevation, driveway and contour information.
(b) The street, driveway and sidewalk grades as allowed by the city engineer.
(c) grading beyond the boundaries of the development without temporary
grading easements from the affected property owner(s).
(d) Emergency overflow swales as required by the city engineer or by the
watershed district. The design of the overflow swales shall be approved
by the city engineer.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
0
(3) There shall be no parking on either side of the new private driveway. The developer
or contractor shall post the driveways with no parking signs.
(4) The tree plan shall:
(a) Show where the developer or contractor will remove, save or replace large
trees.
(b) Show the size, species and location of the replacement and screening trees.
The new screening trees shall be grouped together. These planting areas shall
be along the south and east sides of the site to help screen the development
from the existing and proposed houses to the south. The deciduous trees shall
be at least two and one half (2 1/2) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of
red and white oaks, ash, lindens, sugar maples or other native species. The
coniferous trees shall be at least eight (8) feet tall and shall be a mix of
Austrian pine and other species.
(c) Show the planting or transplanting of at least 20 trees after the site grading is
done.
(d) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
(e) Include for city staff a detailed tree planting plan and material list.
(5) All the parking areas and driveways shall have continuous concrete curb and gutter
except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed for drainage purposes.
All driveways must be at least 18 feet long.
(6) The design of the rainwater garden and its outlet shall be subject to the approval of
the city engineer. The outlet shall be protected to prevent erosion. The developer
shall give the city an easement for this drainage area and shall be responsible for
getting any needed off -site pond and drainage easements.
(7) Provide a minimum of six-inch-thick sidewalk section at each driveway.
(8) The site, driveway, sidewalk and utility plans shall show:
(a) Asix - foot -wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Gervais Avenue
between the west end of the existing sidewalk and the west property line of
the site. The public works director shall approve the location and design of the
sidewalk.
(b) A water service to each unit.
(c) Repair of Gervais Avenue (street and boulevard) after the developer connects
to the public utilities and builds the private driveway.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
9
(d) The coordination of the water main locations, alignments and sizing with the
standards and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services
(SPRWS). Fire -flow requirements and hydrant locations shall be verified with
the Maplewood Fire Department.
(e) The plan and profiles of the proposed utilities.
b. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction and have each building staked by a registered land
surveyor.
c. Revise the landscape plan for city staff approval showing:
(1) Foundation plantings of perennials and shrubs (with mulch) for the areas between the sidewalks
and the proposed buildings.
(2) The planting of additional native evergreens on the site to provide additional screening. These
additional trees should include eastern red cedar, eastern arborvitae, and other native species.
These additional trees should be located as follows:
(a) Along the north property line of 1725 Gervais Avenue.
(b) Along the south side of the new driveway (along the south property line of proposed
Parcel A).
(c) Along the west side of the new driveway (along the east property line of Parcel B.)
The trees in these locations shall be at least six feet tall, in staggered rows (if possible) and are to
provide screening that is at least 80 percent opaque.
(3) All lawn areas shall be sodded. The city engineer shall approve the vegetation within the
rainwater garden.
(4) Having in- ground irrigation for all landscape areas (code requirement).
d. Show city staff that Ramsey County has recorded the deeds, cross easements and all homeowners
association documents for this development before the city will issue a certificate of occupancy for
the first town house unit.
e. Submit a photometric plan for staff approval as required by the city code.
f. Revise the site plan or the property lines so that the town houses meet the setback requirements of
the building code and of the building official.
3. Complete the following before occupying the buildings:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction and set new property
irons for the new property comers.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards and sod all turf areas outside of the rainwater garden.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
10
C. Install a reflectorized stop sign at the Gervais Avenue exit, a handicap - parking sign for each
handicap - parking space, no parking signs along the private driveway and addresses on each
building for each unit. In addition, the applicant shall install stop signs and traffic directional
signs within the site, as required by staff.
d. Construct a six - foot -wide concrete public sidewalk on the north side of Gervais Avenue
between the west end of the existing sidewalk and the west property line of the site. The
Maplewood Public Works Director shall approve the location and design of the sidewalk.
e. Provide pedestrian ramps in the sidewalk along Gervais Avenue to match the entrance
driveway. Any future driveway shall match the grade of the new sidewalk.
f. Complete the site grading and install all required landscaping, the rainwater garden and an
in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas (code requirement).
g. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter along all interior driveways and around all open
parking stalls, except where the city engineer determines that it is not necessary.
h. Install on -site lighting for security and visibility, subject to city staff approval.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount
shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be
completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of
occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
C. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor
changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
2. 7:15 P.M. Water Resources Management Plan
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Associate Planner Ken Roberts presented the specifics of the report.
d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents.
e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
11
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following revised Water Resource
Management Plan:
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN
The goals and policies in this plan for the management of water resources in Maplewood are consistent with the goals of
Ramsey - Washington Metro, Valley Branch, Capital Region and East Mississippi Watershed Districts, while meeting the
more specific and changing needs of the City. A map showing the four watershed districts is on page 12.
Maplewood recognizes the sensitivity of surface water and groundwater and has established environmental protection
policies and standards (as noted below) that enhance protection of the environment, including surface water and
groundwater resources, in the city and in the region.
The goals and policies in this plan provide for future development and redevelopment in Maplewood while minimizing
surface water problems and enhancing and protecting the environment. The City has adopted ordinances about flood plains,
shorelands, wetland protection and erosion control to address the specific problems and concerns that these special
conditions present.
In addition, an important part of the water resources management plan is the management (including maintenance and
enforcement programs) of individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS). The city will ensure protection of the public health
and local surface water and groundwater through implementation of the Water Resources Management Plan, the ordinances
and standards for ISTS and will continue to use and enforce the other city ordinances noted above.
WATER QUALITY
Goal
Maintain or enhance the water quality of Maplewood's surface waters.
Policies
1. Cooperate and collaborate with the four watershed districts to maintain and improve water quality.
2. Cooperate and collaborate with the watershed districts in their efforts to maintain and /or to improve the water quality
of specific water resources in the City.
3. Provide an appropriate level of storm water treatment upstream of lakes and wetlands, depending on the wetland's
functions, values and management classification.
4. Use regional storm water detention facilities to enhance water quality by removing sediment and nutrients from
runoff. Pond designs will meet the national urban run -off program (NURP) removal standards.
5. All projects using storm water treatment structures shall include a detailed City- approved maintenance plan that
meets City and watershed district standards and criteria.
6. Design storm water facility inlets to prevent debris from entering the conveyance system and impeding the flow path.
Encourage using BMPs (best management practices) ( "rainwater gardens," treatment structures, NURP ponds, etc.)
and other detention facilities on all improvement and reconstruction projects, whenever practical.
7. Design outlet control structures, wherever practical, that restrict both high and low flows, to maximize sedimentation
and nutrient removal.
8. Continue implementation of the City's education program that includes items about preserving and improving water
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
12
quality.
9. Solve intercommunity water - quality issues through cooperation with the adjoining cities and appropriate watershed
district.
RUNOFF MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD CONTROL
Goal
Preserve, maintain, utilize and where practical, enhance the storm water storage and detention systems to control excessive
volumes and rates of runoff, control flooding, protect public health and safety and to minimize necessary public capital
expenditures.
Note: The map on page 12 shows the general areas in Maplewood that have the potential for flooding. The City adopted a
floodplain ordinance in 1991.
Policies
1. The City recognizes that runoff volumes typically increase with development; however, the City will require builders
and developers to maintain peak runoff rates below the pre- development 100 -year (1 percent) recurrence event by
using regional detention facilities, rain water gardens or other on -site detention facilities and encouraging the use of
infiltration to reduce runoff volumes where practical. All hydrologic modeling shall be based on ultimate
development of the affected watershed.
2. The City encourages the pretreatment of storm water. In addition, the City encourages the use of treatment ponds and
infiltration methods for storing storm water to reduce runoff rates and volume and to improve the water quality of
area lakes and wetlands.
3. Storm water management improvements shall be designed based on the critical storm event for, and the ultimate
development of, the drainage area.
4. Projects that affect the storm water system shall have a protected emergency overflow structure (i.e., Swale, spillway)
into pond outlet structures to safely convey excess flows from storms larger than the 100 -year (1 percent) event.
5. Maplewood will require minimum building floor elevations to be above the 100 -year floodplain, in accordance with
City and watershed district standards. At a minimum, the lowest opening of any building shall be 2.0 feet above the
100 -year floodplain and /or 1.0 foot above the spillway overflow elevation, whichever is greater.
6. Maintain existing intercommunity drainage patterns and solve any intercommunity drainage issues through
cooperation and collaboration with the adjoining city and the appropriate watershed district.
7. Promote storm water infiltration practices where soil conditions allow and where not detrimental to groundwater
supplies.
WETLANDS
Goal
Achieve no net loss of wetlands, including acreage, functions and values. Where practicable, improve the functions,
values, biodiversity and acreage of wetlands and their buffer areas.
Note: The map on page 12 shows the wetlands in Maplewood. The City adopted a wetland protection ordinance in 1996.
Policies
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
13
1. The City discourages wetland alterations. Proof that applicants or designers have given consideration to designs that
do not require wetland alteration shall be reviewed before the City will consider any proposal that includes wetland
alteration. Wetland alterations must be mitigated by meeting the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) requirements, as
administered by the local government units (LGUs) (currently the watershed districts).
2. Cooperate with the watershed districts in their administration of the WCA.
3. Cooperate with Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) in the administration of its wetland
management plan.
4. Seek to restore previously existing wetlands and enhance existing wetlands.
5. Provide buffer zones of native vegetation around ponds and wetlands to provide wildlife habitats, in accordance with
the Maplewood Wetland Buffer Ordinance.
6. Where feasible, minimize water level fluctuations (bounce) in wetlands or detention basins to prevent adverse habitat
changes.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
Goals
1. Protect capacity of storm water system, prevent flooding and maintain water quality by preventing erosion and
sedimentation from occurring, and correct existing erosion and sedimentation problems.
2. In accordance with NPDES Phase H requirements, develop a city - maintenance plan for the inspection of all ponds,
outlet structures and inlet facilities and consider initiating a pond delta removal program. Such a program should
consider improvements to reduce sediment loads to ponds, wetlands and lakes to help prioritize critical improvement
areas.
Policies
1. Require erosion control plans for all land disturbance activities as defined by city ordinance. The erosion control
plans shall be consistent with the standards and criteria of the watershed districts' plans, the Ramsey Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook and general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) construction
storm water permit requirements.
2. Preserve and enhance natural vegetation to the greatest practical extent.
GROUNDWATER
Goals
1. Protect the quality and quantity of groundwater resources.
2. Develop a cooperative program with the watershed district to identify infiltration- sensitive areas and develop a
monitoring and testing program to monitor the impact of improvements.
Policies
1. Provide increased green space, native vegetation and pond "dead" storage wherever possible and appropriate to allow
for the infiltration of storm water runoff and to promote groundwater recharging.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
14
2. Encourage use of grassed waterways to maximize infiltration where not detrimental to groundwater supplies.
3. Promote awareness of groundwater resource issues through public education and information programs.
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS (ISTS
Goals
1. Protect the public health, safety and welfare through a comprehensive ISTS ordinance.
2. Protect the quality and quantity of Maplewood's surface and groundwater resources through the use of properly
designed and maintained ISTS.
Policies
1. Maintain an updated record of all known on -site septic systems, and continue to prohibit the installation of new
individual sewer systems or the alteration, repair or extension of existing systems when the builder or owner can
make connection to the City's sanitary sewer.
2. Enforce individual water and septic system ordinances that are in conformance with MPCA Rules 7080 and
Metropolitan Council requirements. Maplewood will establish a management program that includes maintenance,
tracking and enforcement programs ,to insure that residents properly maintain their individual sewage treatment
systems (ISTS).3. Maplewood will require property owners to meet and encourage them to exceed state rules and
local ordinances for the design, installation, maintenance, expansion and repair of private on -site sewage treatment
systems. Specifically, the City will adopt an ISTS ordinance for a basis for the use of these systems.
EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Goal
Increase public awareness, understanding and involvement in water and natural resource management issues.
Policies
1. Continue to develop and distribute educational materials to the public and targeted groups about the City's
ordinances, policies and programs about water resources, groundwater, ISTS, wetlands, native vegetation, alternative
landscaping methods, litter control, pet wastes, recycling, trash disposal, leaf collection, public area maintenance,
grass clippings, lawn chemicals and hazardous materials. Information will be distributed via the City's monthly
newsletter, local newspapers, cable television and any other appropriate media.
2. The City will consider alternative funding sources for storm water and surface water management, including starting a
storm water utility and/or imposing additional development fees. This could be part of the Phase II NPDES storm
water permit consideration process.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
3. 7:20 P.M. Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) Ordinance Amendment (First
Reading)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
15
C. Associate Planner Ken Roberts presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Will Rossbach presented the report from the Planning Commission.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. None
were heard.
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the first reading of the ordinance amending the
Maplewood City Code standards for individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) in the city.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
I. AWARD OF BIDS
None
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Storm Sewer Improvements on County Ditch No. 18 @Markham Pond, City Project 02 -02:
Receive Petition and Authorize Preparation of Preliminary Report
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution 02 -01 -003 that authorizes
preparation of a preliminary report for a storm sewer and utility improvements at Markham Pond
Outlet and authorization to explore the sale of a city parcel for City Project 02 -02:
RESOLUTION 02 -01 -003
ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS, it is proposed to construct storm sewer improvements and utility
improvements at the outlet to Markham Pond at Hazelwood Street and Beam Avenue, City
Project 02 -02, and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, a city -owned parcel of property exists at the southwestern corner of the
proposed property that appears to have no need for city ownership.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
luell
That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is
instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary
way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to
whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and
the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended, and
That the vacant city -owned parcel shall be appraised for value and considered for sale to
the property developer as part of this project if authorized by the City Council.
FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $ are appropriated to prepare this
feasibility report.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes — All
2. County Road D Roadway Improvements, City Proj ect 01 -15 : Approve Preliminary Report and
Call Public Hearing
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
C. The following people were heard:
Karl Keel, URS, 3 rd Street, Minneapolis,
George Rossbach, 1406 E. County Road C, Maplewood
Charlotte Wasiluk, 1740 Fern, Maplewood
Carolyn Peterson
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution 02 -01 -004 accepting the report
and calling for a public hearing for the County Road D Improvements, Hazelwood Street to
McKnight Road:
RESOLUTION 02 -01 -004
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted June 25, 2001, a report has
been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of County
Road D Improvements, between Hazelwood Street and McKnight Road, City Proj ect 01 -15, and
this report was received by the council on January 14, 2002, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost - effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the
report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
17
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of
$2
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 28th day of
January, 2002, in the council chambers of city hall at 7:20 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed
and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes — All
3. English Street Roadway Improvements, City Proj ect 01 -14: Approve Preliminary Report and
Call Public Hearing
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adopt the following resolution 02 -01 -005 accepting the report
and calling for a public hearing for the English Street Improvements from Frost Avenue to Cope
Avenue:
RESOLUTION 02 -01 -005
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted June 25, 2001, a report has
been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of English
Street, between Frost Avenue and Cope Avenue, City Proj ect 01 -14, and this report was received
by the council on January 14, 2002, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost - effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the
report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of
$1,794,200.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 28th day of
January, 2002, in the council chambers of city hall at 7:00 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed
and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes — All
4. Gladstone West Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project 00-05: Resolution Directing
Modification of Construction Contract, Change Orders Nos. 1 & 2
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
Im
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution 02 -01 -006 directing the
modification of the existing construction in the amount of $71,190.27:
RESOLUTION 02 -01 -006
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 00 -05, Gladstone West Neighborhood Streets, and has let a construction
contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and
designated as Improvement Project 00 -05, Change Orders 1 and 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Orders 1 and 2 in the amount of
$9,520.15 and $61.670.12 respectively. The revised contract amount is $1,033,053.85.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to
implement the financing plan for the project. The project budget is increased by $71,190.27.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes — All
5. Bush Avenue Improvements, City Project 01 -04: Resolution Directing Modification of
Construction Contract, Change Order No. 1
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution 02 -01 -007 for modification
of the construction contract for Bush Avenue, City Project 01 -04 in the amount of $4927.61,
represented by Change Order No. 1:
RESOLUTION 02 -01 -007
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 01 -04, Bush Avenue, from Stillwater Road to Bartelmy Lane, and has let a
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and
designated as Improvement Project 01 -04, Change Order No. 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
lut
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 1 in the amount of $4,927.61.
The revised contract amount is $231,720.13.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to
implement the financing plan for the project. The project budget is increased by $4,927.61.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes — All
6. Approve Assessment rates for the 2002 Construction Season
a. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to establish the 2002 construction season street assessment rates
at the 2000 base rates outlined in the Maplewood Pavement Management Policy, and establish
the storm sewer assessment rate at $630 /unit.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes — All
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. School Closings The following people were heard:
Dan Kaler- Superintendent of Schools District 622, updated the council on the impact of the
failed school levy, proposed budget cuts and upcoming public forums.
Jerry Markie -1247 Leland Road, Maplewood -- provided further statistics on the budget deficit
and its effects on the schools.
Ron Cockriel -943 Century Avenue, expressed his concerns on the proposed loss of Beaver Lake
and the impact on the staff and students and adding the option of a charter school.
Rosemary -a student at Transfiguration - doesn't want the school and daycare to close and loose
her friends.
John -A Maplewood Resident - stated he felt there were misperceptions with the levy and hoped
that it could be once again reviewed.
Bob Zick -1880 E. Shore Drive- would like to see the charter school supported by the school
district and city.
George Rossbach -1406 County Road C- doesn't understand why Maplewood is always at fault
when District 622 encompasses other cities.
Jackie Monaghan - Junek- 2430 E. Larpenteur Ave. -asked that people work together and rally to
save the schools.
2. Cable Commission Councilmember Koppen spoke about an article in the St. Paul
Pioneer Press regarding senior citizen discounts.
3. Partnership - Councilmember Wasiluk informed citizens about the musical "Change" playing on
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
20
January 24 at 2 and 7 p.m. at the Maplewood Community Center at no charge.
4. The Ramsey County League of Local Government meeting will be held Thursday January 24
from 7 to 8:30 p.m. at the League of Minnesota Cities Building, 145 University Avenue.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. City Manager Fursman noted the current problems with the city's web page and hopes they will
be resolved shortly.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adi ourn the meeting at 10:15 P.M.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - All
City Council Meeting 01 -14 -02
21
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: January 22, 2002
Action by Cou ,
�nt
:f �Y ie
ReJec ted
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
T% A T T A 71 T T'1
$116.00 Checks #56546 dated 1/9/02
$330,133.20 Checks #56547 thru #56643 dated 1 /11 thru
1/15/02
$106,596.87 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1/4 thru 1/14/02
$82.50 Checks #56644 dated 1/15/02
$307,882.21 Checks #56645 thru #56726 dated 1/18 thru
1/22/02
$192,002.57 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1 /11 thru 1/22/02
$936,813.35 Total Accounts Payable
Tl A T 77% r1 T T
$501,225.68 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
1/18/02
$35,332.15 Payroll Deduction checks #87549 thru #87553
dated 1/18/02
$536,557.83 Total Payroll
$1,473,371.18 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any
questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation
on file if necessary.
hu
attachments
PARNANCE\WORMAGMApC]AR Jan2ldoc
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
01/11/2002 10 :42:50AM City of Maplewood
Check Date
56546
1/9/02
56547
1/15/01
56548
1/15/01
56549
1/15/01
56550
1/15/01
Vendor
Description /Account
01361
RENEE'S CAFE AND DELI
00049
ADT SECURITY SERVICES
00052
ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC.
02074
AHL, R CHARLES
00090
AMERICAN RED CROSS
56551 1/15/01 00111 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
56552
1/15/01
00135
56553
1/15/01
00134
56554
1/15/01
00140
56555
1/15/01
01892
56556
1/15/01
00196
56557
1/15/01
00198
56558
1/15/01
01865
56559
1/15/01
00214
56560
1/15/01
02329
56561
1/15/01
00283
56562
1/15/01
00323
56563
1/15/01
01871
56564
1/15/01
00332
56565
1/15/01
02251
56566
1/15/ 01
00358
ASSN. OF TRNG OFFICERS OF MN
ASSOC OF METRO MUNICIPALITIES
AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS, INC.
BARBAROSSA & SONS INC
BLUEBIRD RECOVERY PROGRAM
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
BOWMAN, DON
BREHEIM HEATING INC.
BRINK, TROY
CENTURY COLLEGE
CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP.
COOPER, KEN
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY
CUSTOM HEADSETS INC
D & 'D TOWING SERVICE INC.
56567
1/15/01
00415
DON'S PAINT & BODY SHOP
56568
1/15/01
00463
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
56569
1/15/01
00485
FBINAA NORTHWEST CHAPTER
56570
1/15/01
00519
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO.
56571
1/15101
02262
GEBO, ROBERT L
56572
1/15/01
00584
GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING
56573
1/15/01
01852
GUARANTEED CLEAN MAINTENANCE
56574
1/11/01
02333
GUDMUNDSON, DON
56575
1/15/01
01867
HANSOM, PERRY
56576
1/15/01
00677
HOME DEPOT - GECF
56577
1/15/01
00483
IDEACOM MID- AMERICA
56578
1/15/01
02237
IMPERIAL IMPRESSIONS
56579
1/15/01
00718
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622
56580
1/15/01
02331
INTL ASSOC OF PLUMBING &
56581
1/15/01
00744
J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC.
56582
1/15/01
00771
JOHNSON, RICK
56583
1/15/01
01894
KELLY & FAWCETT PA
56584
1/15/01
01874
KULAS, RON
56585
1/15/01
00821
KVAM, DAVID
56586
1/15/01
00393
LABOR & INDUSTRY, DEPT OF
56587
1/15/01
02266
LADEW, JEFF
MANAGEMENT TRAINING LUNCHES
REPAIR VIDEO EQUIPMENT
REFLECTIVE EXPLORER DECALS
REIMBURSE PARKING - MEETING
LIFE GUARD TRAINING FEE
FIRST AID & SAFETY PARTICIPANTS MA
COMMUNITY FIRST AID MANUALS
PATROL & BOARDING FEES
PATROL & BOARDING FEES
2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES
2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR AMM
WINDSHIELD FOR VEH 9906
PROD 99 -02 PYMT 3- INCLUDES CHG OR
2002 MEMBERSHIP
QUARTERLY UTIL - BILL DATE 12/31/01
ANNUAL AUTO FIRE SUPPLY
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
SERVICE FURNACE AT FOUR SEASONS
UNIFORM
EMT NATL REGISTRY EXAM - 2
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
2002 MEMBERSHIP
HEADSET
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
TOW DISTRICT CHIEF VEHICLE
REPAIR SQUAD 946
REPAIR RESCUE 2 VEHICLE
NFPA PUMP TEST - LADDER 1
2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES
ROD WITH COUPLING, ADAPTOR ROD
VOLLYEBALL REFEREE
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
CLEAN CARPET STATION 7
TRAINING SESSION FEE 1/13/02
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
BULBS & MISC
FORWARD FIRE DEPT TELEPHONE LI
VEHICLE THEFT REPORT FORMS
WITNESS/VICTIM STMT FORMS
TOWING & IMPOUND REPORT FORMS
BUILDING RENTAL/SUPV
2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES
RECYCLING OF A/C & APPLIANCES
DEER REMOVAL ON 12/2/01
LEGAL SERVICES - DEC
PROSECUTION RETAINER FEE - DEC
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
REIMBURSE TUITION & BOOKS
.AIR TANK REGISTRATION
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
Amount
116.00
2,982.00
89.67
7.00
40.00
81.00
120.38
1,274.01
768.51
25.00
7,898.00
290.83
74,235.39
8.00
53.06
700.00
377.50
88.03
139.98
120.00
295.78
200.00
35.00
113.58
74.55
74.55
122.48
58.58
414.30
987.75
410.75
120.00
1,039.04
304.00
159.85
109.75
272.00
350.00
266.00
98.54
310.00
262.11
375.18
386.38
94.50
50.00
148.00
100.00
10,162.82
5,250.00
285.00
426.03
20.00
323.00
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
01/11/2002 10:42:50AM City of Maplewood
Check
Date
56588
1/15/01
56589
1/15/01
56590
1/15/01
Vendor
00836
01873
00932
56591
1/15/01
00951
56592
1/15/01
01610
56593
1/15/01
02330
56594
1/15/01
00981
56595
1/15/01
00986
56596
1/15/01
01050
56597
1/15/01
01035
56598
1/15/01
01079
56599
1/15/01
02332
56600
1/15/01
01086
56601
1/15/01
01087
56602
1/15/01
01058
56603
1/15/01
01111
56604
1/15/01
01148
56605
1/15/01
01168
56606
1/15/01
01887
56607
1/15/01
01914
:56608
1/15/01
00001
56609
1/15/01
00001
:56610
1/15/01
00001
56611
1/15/01
00001
56612
1/15/01
01225
LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER
LAYMAN, KARI
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
MAX STEININGER INC
METAL DOCTOR, THE
METEROLOGIX
METRO EAST DEVELOPMENT PART.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
MINNESOTA NATURALIST ASSOC.
MN CHAPTER IAAI
MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC.
MN MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY
MN NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
MN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION
MN SHREDDING LLC
MOTOROLA, INC
NATURAL AREAS ASSOCIATION
NORDQUIST, RICK
NORTHLAND CONCRETE & MASONARY
OLSON, LIZ
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS
56613
1/15/01
01229
OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC.
56614
1/15/01
01863
PACKER, ROGER
56615
1/15/01
01909
PARKOS CONSTRUCTION CO
56616
1/15/01
01941
PATRICK GRAPHICS & TROPHIES
56617
1/15/01
02096
56618
1/15/01
01313
56619
1/15/01
02249
56620
1/15/01
01342
56621
1/15/01
01349
56622
1/15/01
01359
56623
1/15/01
00069
56624
1/15/01
01375
56625
1/15/01
01387
56626
1/15/01
01419
56627
1/15/01
02222
56628
1/15/01
01463
56629
1/15/01
01823
56630
1/15/01
01516
56631
1/15/01
01558
56632
1/15/01
01574
56633
1/15/01
01584
56634
1/15/01
01588
56635
1/15/01
01868
56636
1/15/01
01635
56637
1/15/01
01580
56638
1/15/01
01691
PETERSON, TED
PUMP AND METER SERVICE, INC.
QWEST GOVERNMENT SRVS INC
RAMSEY COUNTY CHIEF OF
RANGER RICK
REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL
RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES
ROBERTS, KEN
ROSSINI, DR. JAMES
SAN LUCAS MISSION
SHEFFIELD, OLSON & MCQUEEN INC
SISTER ROSALIND GEFRE
ST CROIX RECREATION CO INC
STAPLES, PAULINE
SUPERIOR PRINTWEAR
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
TALLEN & BAERTSCHI
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J
TOSKEY, RON
TOWER ASPHALT
TSE, INC.
U.S. POLICE CANINE ASSOC.
Description /Account
2002 MEMBERSHIPS - 4
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
BIRTHDAY CAKES
BIRTHDAY CAKES
FIRE STATION APPL #3
4x8 GRATED EXPANDED METAL
SUBSCRIPTION & INITIATION FEES
2002 MEMBERSHIP
CD ROM - STORMWATER MGMT PRACT
2002 MEMBERSHIP
2002 MEMBERSHIP
2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES
2002 MEMBERSHIP
2002 MEMBERSHIP
2002 MEMBERSHIP
PAPER SHREDDING
ADD CHANNELS TO DISPATCH
2002 MEMBERSHIP
UNIFORM
FIRE STATION APP #9
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
REF BUSH CHILDREN GROUP HOME - T
REF GEORGE R JOHNSON - DNR FEE
REF MARY KOREN - MEMBERSHIP
REF AMY CHIARELLA - ARTS & CRAFTS
HOSE
HOSE 4 STORZ CAP & COUPLINGS, MI
ACETYLENE & OXYGEN COMPRESSED
OFFICIATED 38 GAMES
FIRE STATION APPL #11- REVISED
TROPHIES
TROPHIES
REIMBURSE FOR FUEL
REPLACED BREAKAWAY ON #3 DIESEL
REVIEWED SYSTEM SET UP
E911 EQUIPMENT, INSTALLATION, TRAI
2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES
2002 SUBSCRIPTION
CAR WASHES - DEC
COMMISSION PYMT TO COLLECTIONS
TUITION & BOOKS - FALL 2001
FITNESS PROGRAM FEES - DEC
COFFEE
DCRP & FLEX PLAN WEEKLY PYMTS
MCC MASSAGES - DEC
6' ALUMINUM PLANK
ICE FOR BROKEN SNACK BAR MACHIN
UNIFORMS FOR DISPATCHERS
42.95 TONS RECYCLED BASE
2002 SUBSCRIPTION
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 12/3 TO 12/27
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
2.51 TONS UPM MIX
NEWSLETTER
2002 MEMBERSHIP
Amount
100.00
228.00
71.25
42.75
3,651.79
185.31
1,890.84
500.00
23.96
75.00
25.00
150.00
18.00
12.00
25.00
49.95
2,285.49
30.00
103.98
2,436.75
57.00
123.50
52.50
45.00
27.00
37.32
581.00
56.00
722.00
29,931.20
69.01
649.86
32.70
156.86
245.66
118,067.32
20.00
17.00
148.28
45.00
1,679.07
100.00
13.31
451.63
2,418.00
237.22
21.25
2,160.50
208.12
90.00
23.81
285.00
219.20
230.33
40.00
�i
vchlist
01 /11/2002 10:42 :50AM
Check Register Page: 3
City of Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
145.86
56639
1/15/01
01755
WEBER ELECTRIC
56640
1/15/01
01872
WEBER, MARK
56641
1/15/01
01783
WINGER, DONALD J
56642
1/15/01
01190
XCEL ENERGY
56643
1/15/01
01807
ZWIEG, SUSAN
98 Checks in this report
Amount
UPGRADE UPS SYSTEM
6,436.00
REPLACE PARKING LOT LAMP
145.86
INSTALL RECEPTACLE - AIR COMPRESS
264.40
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
152.00
REPLENISH EVIDENCE BUY FUND
100.00
MONTHLY UTILITIES - STMT DATE 1/4
38,850.39
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 1/3/02
10.95
Total checks 330,249.20
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee
Description
12/28/01
01/04/02
Elan Financial Services
Purchasing card items
01/04/02
01/07/02
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
01/07/02
01/08/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
01/07/02
01/08/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
01/04/02
01/08/02
MN State Treasurer
State Payroll Tax
01/04/02
01/08/02
CBSA
Dental Claims
01/08/02
01/09/02
MN State Treasurer
. Drivers License #697
01/08/02
01/09/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
01/09/02
01/10/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
01/09/02
01/10/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
01/10/02
01/11/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
01/10/02
01/11/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
01/11/02
01/14/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
01/11/02
01/14/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
TOTAL
Amount
25,964.24
1,888.00
1,108.50
12,495.25
14,712.58
74.10
1,195.00
12,428.70
1,026.00
9,795.50
813.50
10,763.75
657.00
13,674.75
1 VV,V-JV.V
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
01/18/2002 10:51:37AM City of Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
56644
1/15/02
00908
M.R.P.A.
MRPA ANNUAL MEETING /AWARDS BAN
82.50
56645
1/22/02
01908
ADMINISTRATION, DEPT OF
INTERNET EMAIL - DEC
374.85
DATA PROCESSING - NOV
392.00
56646
1/22/02
02234
AIRBORNE 1 CORPORATION
HIGH RESOLUTION LIDAR DEM DATA, P
8,052.84
56647
1/22/02
00072
ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC
REPAIR TRAIL LIGHTING
2,555.00
56648
1/22/02
00111
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
PATROL & BOARDING FEES
1,430.37
56649
1/22/02
02324
APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES
GPS DATA CAPTURE & PROCESSING F
968.35
:MAP FOR APPLEWOOD PRESERVE TO 1
1,000.00
56650
1/22/02
00021
AWD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA
WATER COOLER SERVICE
319.02
56651
1/22/02
00159
BARTZ, PAUL
REIMBURSE TUITION
1,402.65
56652
1/22/02
01811
BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC
IMERCH FOR RESALE
241.20
56653
1/22/02
02341
BOYER, SCOTT K
UNIFORMS
125.00
56654
1/22/02
01922
BREHEIM, ROGER
UNIFORM
150.50
56655
1/22/02
00240
C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES
APPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECK
50.00
56656
1/22/02
00244
CABLING SERVICES CORP
REPAIR DISPLAY SIGN
547.33
56657
1/22/02
00252
CAPITOL CITY REG FIRE FIGHTERS
2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES
50.00
56658
1/22/02
00262
CARLE, JEANETTE
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 8/2 TO 12/28
24.84.
56659
1/22/02
00272
CARVER, NICHOLAS
REIMBURSE PARKING
8.50
56660
1/22/02
00280
CENTRAL STORES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
31.74
56661
1/22/02
00287
CHANNING L. BETE CO., INC.
PHAMPLETS FOR COUNCIL
35.29
56662
1/22/02
02340
CLINTON, JACK
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
50,000.00
56663
1/22/02
02211
CRYSTAL, CITY OF
STANDARDIZED FIELD SOBRIETY TRNG
45.00
56664
1/22/02
00363
DLT SOLUTIONS, INC.
AUTO CAD LAND DESTOP 3
5,933.63
56665
1/22/02
00412
DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES
BOOKS FOR MGMT PROGRAM 2001
37.61
56666
1/22/02
00449
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
SOFTWARE SUPPORT - 2002
16,439.07
56667
1/22/02
00463
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
REPAIR TO MEDIC 2 VEHICLE
378.00
56668
1/22/02
00513
FIRSTAR TRUST SERVICES
PAYING AGENT FEE 2001
175.00
PAYING AGENT FEE
87.50
56669
1/22/02
02071
FISHER, DAVID
REIMBURSE PARKING
6.00
56670
1/22/02
00539
FREEDOM VALU CENTER
CAR WASHES
84.00
CAR WASHES
27.00
56671
1/22/02
00585
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL
NET BILLABLE TICKETS - DEC
20.15
56672
1/22/02
00483
IDEACOM MID- AMERICA
SERVICE TELEPHONES
678.95
56673
1/22/02
00711
IPMA -MN CHAPTER ADMIN
IPMA MEETING
11.00
56674
1/22/02
00789
KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE CO
6998 GALS ARTIC BLEND DIESEL, LOW
4,260.73
56675
1/22/02
00828
L.M.C.I.T.
CLAIM DEDUCTIBLES
2,977.55
CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE
836.29
CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE
884.00
56676
1/22/02
00393
LABOR & INDUSTRY, DEPT OF
BOILER & AIR TANK EXEMPTIONS
80.00
BOILER & AIR TANK EXEMPTIONS
30.00
56677
1/22/02
02336
M A TAYLOR INC
EAR PLUGS
74.3.7
56678
1/22/02
00908
M.R.P.A.
REGISTRATION /SANCTION FEE - 74 TE
1,184.00
56679
1/22/02
00888
M/A ASSOCIATES
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
106.51
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
101.84
56680
1/22/02
00925
MAJESTIC LANDSCAPE CONTR., INC
BLOW OUT IRRIGATION LINES
150.00
56681
1/22/02
00932
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
COOKIES FOR MEETING & OATH OF OF
38.49
COOKIES - MEETING
8.88
56682
1/22/02
00945
MASYS CORP
HARDWARE /SOFTWARE MAINT - FEB
738.68
56683
1/22/02
01819
MCLEOD USA
DSL SERVICE - EMERGENCY MGMT
71.02
DSL SERVICE - EDGERTON GYM
101.47
DSL SERVICE - STATION 1
68.80
DSL SERVICE - STATION 3
210.20
56684
1/22/02
01610
METAL DOCTOR, THE
SALES TAX OWED - FABRICATION LABO
2.73
56685
1/22/02
02077
MICRO COMPUTER SOLUTIONS
REPAIR DESIGNJET 650 PLOTTER
241.54
vchlist
Check Register
Page: 2
01/18/2002
10:51:37AM
City of Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
56686
1/22/02
01051
MN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
PRE - EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL
132.00
56687
1/22/02
01099
MONROY, JON J.
REIMBURSE FOR FILM DEVELOPING
76.50
PHOTOGRAPHY FEE
250.00
56688
1/22/02
00395
NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF
DNR TITLE
7.50
56689
1/22/02
02337
NEW HOPE, CITY OF
2002 TUG MAILING DUES
24.00
56690
1/22/02
02072
NORTH STAR CHAPTER
3 I RC CODE BOOKS
115.80
56691
1/22/02
02334
NORTHERN IRON WORKS
WELD HAND RAIL, STEPS & GATE - PW
200.00
56692
1/22/02
02338
OLLUM APPLIANCE
REPAIR WATER FOUNTAIN
56.60
56693
1/22/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
JASON SAGSTETTER - RESERVE
171.50
56694
1/22/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF SUSAN BERGMANN - SWIM LESSOP
90.00
56695
1/22/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF JANITH HEDSTROM - MEMBERSHIP
55.00
56696
1/22102
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF AMY CHIARELLA - ARTS & CRAFT
27.00
56697
1/22/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF GEOFF CRANE - MEMBERSHIP
10.00
56698
1/22/02
01311
P.E. R.A.
ER ID #6120- 00,01,51 - 01/18/02 P/R
40,535.79
56699
1/22/02
01254
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
MERCH FOR RESALE
280.30
56700
1/22/02
01329
R.L.S. SPORTSWEAR INC.
UNIFORMS
1,323.40
56701
1/22/02
01345
RAMSEY COUNTY
DATA PROCESSING - NOV
1,047.50
56702
1/22/02
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
MERCH FOR RESALE
480.67
MERCH FOR RESALE
376.48
MERCH FOR RESALE
328.02
56703
1/22/02
00069
RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES
COMMISSION PYMT TO COLLECTIONS
179.79
56704
1/22/02
01372
ROADRUNNER
COURIER SERVICE - MCC NEWS
54.36
56705
1/22/02
02342
SCHREIBER, SCOTT
REIMBURSE FOR SEWER BACKUP DAM
1,024.99
56706
1/22/02
02222
SHEFFIELD, OLSON & MCQUEEN INC
DCRP & FLEX PLAN WEEKLY PAYMENT
1,009.47
56707
1/22/02
01458
SIGNS BY NORTHLAND
DOOR SIGNS - 2
92.57
56708
1/22/02
01468
SLABA, JACLEE
MURAL PAINTING
420.00
56709
1/22/02
01473
SMITH DIVING
SNORKELING INSTRUCTOR
1,967.00
SCUBA INSTRUCTOR
140.00
56710
1/22/02
02229
SNELL MECHANICAL INC
MECH MAINT CONT - OCT
927.00
MECH MAINT CONTRACT - OCT
794.00
MECH MAINT CONTRACT - OCT
354.00
REPAIR FLAME SAFETY CONTROLLER
1,509.10
SERVICE HOT WATER GLYCOL PLUMP
855.86
MCC DEHUMIDIFICATION SYSTEM UPGF
20,000.00
MCC DEHUMIDIFICATION SYSTEM UPGF
20,000.00
REPAIR BOILER #4
1,344.00
56711
1/22/02
01489
SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP INC.
MERCH FOR RESALE
2,166.75
56712
1/22/02
01491
SPECIALTY RADIO SERVICES
REPLACED DEFECTIVE SPEAKER/MIC
101.07
INSTALL IGNITION CONTROL CONNECT(
56.91
MOTOROLA EQUIPMENT
380.21
56713
1/22/02
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
PROJ 00 -05 - REHOOK SERVICE CANNE
4,148.17
REPAIR DAMAGED STOP BOX
447.07
PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES
327.00
RADIO SERVICE & MAINT - DEC
4,642.75
56714
1/22/02
01560
SUPERIOR SERVICES INC
RECYCLING - DEC
16,377.91
56715
1/22/02
01572
SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.
INK CARTRIDGES
431.79
56716
1/22/02
01574
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
PROJ 00 -05 PYMT #6 GLADSTONE WES
52,526.36
56717
1/22/02
01590
TAYLOR, MARSHA
FITNESS CONSULTANT SRVS - 4TH QT
1,250.00
56718
1/22/02
02164
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
PROJ 01 -04 PROF SRVS BUSH AVE
7,035.86
PROD 01 -16 PROF SRVS HAZELWOOD
12,595.85
56719
1/22/02
01580
TSE, INC.
JANITORIAL SERVICES
675.17
56720
1/22/02
01691
U.S. POLICE CANINE ASSOC.
2002 MEMBERSHIP
40.00
56721
1/22/02
01693
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
REPLENISH POSTAGE METER
3,000.00
56722
1/18/02
02343
VELASQUEZ, ANGELA
1/18/02 PAYROLL
112.63
56723
1/22/02
02339
WALDOR PUMP & EQUIPMENT CO
REPAIR SEWAGE PUMP
414.40
vchlist Check Register Page: 3
01/18/2002 40:51:37AM City of Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
56724
1/22/02
01734
56725
1/22/02
01750
56726
1/22/02
01807
Descr /Ac
WALSH, WILLIAM P. PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
279.50
PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
118.00
WATSON CO INC, THE MERCH FOR RESALE
223.47
MERCH FOR RESALE
342.53
ZWIEG, SUSAN REIMBURSE FOR OFFICE PICTURE
79.12
83 Checks in this report Total checks: 307,964.71
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date
Date
Paxee
Description
Amount
01/04/02
01/11/02
Elan Financial Services
Purchasing card items
25,793.90
01/10/02
01/11/02
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
1
01/14/02
01/15/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
840.75
01/14/02
01/15/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
10,219.63
01/11/02
01/15/02
MN Dept of Revenue
MN Care Tax
1
01/15/02
01/16/02
MN State Treasurer'
Drivers License #697
607.00
01/15/02
01/16/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
4
01/16/02
01/17/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
655.50
01/16/02
01/17/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
5
01/17/02
01/18/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
727.75
01/17/02
01/18/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
5
01/09/02
01/18/02
MN Dept of Revenue
Sales Tax
13,846.00
01/09/02
01/18/02
MN Dept of Revenue
Fuel Tax
453.00
01/18/02
01/22/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
639.00
01/18/02
01/22/02
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
6
01/18/02
01/22/02
U.S. Treasurer
Federal Payroll Tax
113,536.13
TOTAL
192, 002.57
Fool
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
01/18/02
COLLINS, KENNETH
357.47
dd
01/18/02
JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
357.47
dd
01/18/02
KOPPEN, MARVIN
357.47
dd
01/18/02
DARST, ROBERTA
1
dd
01/18/02
FURSMAN, RICHARD
4,330.06
dd
01/18/02
S CHLINGMAN, PAUL
1,944.26
dd
O l / 18/02
SEEGER, GERALD
423.55
dd
01/18/02
SWANSON, LYLE
1,649.76
dd
01/18/02
YOUNG, DILLON
807.80
dd
01/18/02
CARLSON, THERESE
1
dd
01/18/02
EDSON, KAREN
900.00
dd
01/18/02
LE, SHERYL
407.75
dd
01/18/02
FAUST, DANIEL
3,624.34
dd
01/18/02
URBANSKI, HOLLY
1, 5 75.94
dd
01/18/02
ANDERSON, CAROLE
1,960.76
dd
01/18/02
BAUMAN, GAYLE
2,565.96
dd
01/18/02
JACKSON, MARY
1,627.78
dd
01/18/02
KELSEY, CONNIE
1,608.78
dd
01/18/02
TETZLAFF, JUDY
1
dd
01/18/02
FRY, PATRICIA
1,556.10
dd
01/18/02
GUILFOILE, KAREN
2
dd
01/18/02
OSTER, ANDREA
1,606.26
dd
01/18/02
CARLE, JEANETTE
1,4 8 5.14
dd
01/18/02
JAGOE, CAROL
1
dd
01/18/02
JOHNSON, BONNIE
836.94
dd
01/18/02
OLSON, SANDRA
1,006.38
dd
01/18/02
WEAVER, KRISTINE
1
dd
01/18/02
CORCORAN, THERESA
1,610.52
dd
01/18/02
MARTINSON, CAROL
L868.14
dd
01/18/02
POWELL, PHILIP
1,854.03
dd
01/18/02
SPANGLER, EDNA
476.51
dd
01/18/02
SPANGLER, EDNA
353.99
dd
01/18/02
THOMALLA, DAVID
2,992.10
dd
01/18/02
WINGER, DONALD
3,734.43
dd
01/18/02
ABEL, CLINT
1,429.05
dd
01/18/02
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2
dd
01/18/02
ANDREWS, SCOTT
2
dd
01/18/02
BAKKE, LONN
2J78.86
dd
01/18/02
BANICK, JOHN
4,167.70
dd
01/18/02
B ELDE, STANLEY
2,351.12
dd
01/18/02
B OHL, JOHN
2
dd
01/18/02
BOWMAN, RICK
2,301.20
dd
01/18/02
BUSACK, DANIEL
1
dd
01/18/02
HALWEG, KEVIN
23,990.43
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
GIB]
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
01/18/02
HEINZ, STEPHEN
2
dd
01/18/02
HERBERT, MICHAEL
2,202.09
dd
01/18/02
HIEB ERT, STEVEN
2,631.71
dd
01/18/02
JOHNSON, KEVIN
3
dd
01/18/02
KARI S, FLINT
2
dd
01/18/02
KONG, TOMMY
1
dd
01/18/02
KROLL, BRETT
1, 645.80
dd
O l / 18/02
KVAM, DAVID
2,3 96.43
dd
01/18/02
LARSON, DANIEL
2
dd
01/18/02
LU, JOHNNIE
1, 606.7 0
dd
01/18/02
MARINO, JASON
106.70
dd
01/18/02
MARTIN, JERROLD
1
dd
01/18/02
OLSON, JULIE
1,978.68
dd
01/18/02
PIKE, GARY
2
dd
01/18/02
RABBETT, KEVIN
2,589.78
dd
01/18/02
STEFFEN, SCOTT
3
dd
01/18/02
STOCKTON, DERRELL
2,337.00
dd
01/18/02
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2,301.20
dd
01/18/02
WATCZAK, LAURA
2
dd
01/18/02
WENZEL, JAY
L841.17
dd
01/18/02
XIONG, KAO
1,42 9.05
dd
01/18/02
BERGERON, JOSEPH
2,943.12
dd
01/18/02
CROTTY, KERRY
2,182.27
dd
01/18/02
DUNN, ALICE
2,322.76
dd
01/1.8/02
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2,631.24
dd
01/18/02
FLOR, TIMOTHY
2403.04
dd
01/18/02
FRASER, JOHN
2,356.50
dd
01/18/02
HALWEG, JODI
1,672.19
dd
01/18/02
MORNING, TIMOTHY
1
dd
01/18/02
PALMA, STEVEN
2,491.97
dd
01/18/02
PARSONS, KURT
1
dd
01/18/02
ROSSMAN, DAVID
2,182.27
dd
01/18/02
THIENES, PAUL
2,241.74
dd
01/18/02
CHRISTENSEN, CHARLES
1
dd
01/18/02
FITZGERALD, EDWARD
732.00
dd
01/18/02
GRILL, CARL
L032.00
dd
01/18/02
HEMQUIST, MICHAEL
2
dd
01/18/02
HJELLE, ERIK
1
dd
01/18/02
MELANDER, BOBBIE
325.00
dd
01/18/02
MELANDER, SCOTT
1
dd
01/18/02
PETERSON, MARK
5 3 8.00
dd
01/18/02
GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE
2,193.97
dd
01/18/02
BOYER, SCOTT
1 5 870.90
dd
01/18/02
FEHR, JOSEPH
1
dd
01/18/02
FLAUGHER, JAYME
1, 772.5 0
dd
01/18/02
HOM, HEATHER
1
GIB]
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
11
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
01/18/02
LAFFERTY, WALTER
L870.90
870.90
dd
01/18/02
LINN, BRYAN
1,534.90
dd
01/18/02
PACOLT, MARSHA
1
dd
01/18/02
RABINE, JANET
1,772.50
dd
01/18/02
STAHNKE, JULIE
L900.41
dd
01/18/02
CALLAHAN, COLLEEN
2,660.95
dd
01/18102
CALLAHAN, COLLEEN
986.63
dd
01/18/02
LUKIN, STEVEN
2,884.55
dd
01/18/02
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
2,303.24
dd
01/18/02
ZWIEG, SUSAN
L913.35
dd
W/18/02
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
270.09
dd
01/18/02
AHL, R. CHARLES
3,502.04
dd
0
NIVEN, AMY
647.69
dd
01/18/02
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
3,162.74
dd
01/18/02
WEGWERTH, JUDITH
1,606.26
dd
01/18/02
BRINK, TROY
1,312.10
dd
01/18/02
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
1,442.03
-dd
01/18/02
EDGE, DOUGLAS
1,632.58
'dd
01/18/02
KANE, MICHAEL
2,333.22
dd
01/18/02
LUNDSTEN, LANCE
2, 696.5 0
dd
01/18/02
LUTZ, DAVID
3,242.90
dd
01/18/02
MEYER, GERALD
L724.18
:dd
01/18/02
NAGEL, BRYAN
1
dd
01/18/02
OSWALD, ERICK
1,920.20
dd
01/18/02
TEVLIN, TODD
1
dd
01/18/02
CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER
2
dd
01/18/02
DUCHARME, JOHN
1
dd
01/18/02
PECK, DENNIS
2,646.66
dd
.01/18/02
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
4
dd
01/18/02
ANDERSON, BRUCE
3,355.85
dd
01/18/02
DOHERTY, KATHLEEN
1, 606.2 6
dd
01/18/02
MARUSKA, MARK
2
dd
01/18/02
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
1
dd
01/18/02
GREW- HAYMAN, JANET
1
dd
01/18/02
HORSNELL, JUDITH
285.73
dd
01/18/02
HORSNELL, JUDITH
3,245.54
dd
01/18/02
HUTCHINSON, ANN
1,914.74
dd
01/18/02
KOS, HEATHER
118.75
dd
01/18/02
NELSON, JEAN
967.89
dd
01/18/02
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
1
dd
01/18/02
COLEMAN, MELINDA
3
dd
01/18/02
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
2,288.41
dd
01/18/02
KROLL, LISA
936.59
dd
01/18/02
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE
834.67
dd
01/18/02
SINDT, ANDREA
1,2 65.94
dd
01/18/02
THOMPSON, DEBRA
625.97
11
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
I
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
01/18/02
YOUNG, TAMELA
1,171.7 8
dd
01/18/02
BERGO, CHAD
1,799.06
dd
01/18/02
FINWALL, SHANN
1,729.86
dd
01/18/02
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2,157.06
dd
01/18/02
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2,222.42
dd
01/18/02
FISHER, DAVID
2,499.46
dd
01/18/02
ANZALDI, MALADY
73.50
dd
01/18/02
FLUG, ELAINE
43.94
dd
01/18/02
FLUG, MEGAN
111.38
dd
01/18/02
GRAF, MICHAEL
2,051.04
dd
01/18/02
KELLY, LISA
1
dd
01/18/02
LUSHANKO, ADAM
56.00
dd
01/18/02
MCBRIDE, PATRICK
80.00
dd
01/18/02
ROBBINS, AUDRA
1
dd
01/18/02
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,349.22
dd
01/18/02
BREHEIM, ROGER
1
dd
01/18/02
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
1,677.22
dd
01/18/02
OTIS, MARY ELLEN
705.46
dd
01/18/02
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
1, 644.22
dd
01/18/02
COLEMAN, PHILIP
409.20
dd
01/18/02
CROSSON, LINDA
1,943.46
dd
01/18/02
EASTMAN, THOMAS
2,269.54
dd
01/18/02
ERICKSON, KYLE
517.62
dd
01/18/02
HABLE, NATASHA
430.90
dd
01/18/02
HERSOM, HEIDI
1,5 66.42
dd
01/18/02
MCCLUNG, HEATHER
791.25
dd
01 / 18/02
STAPLES, PAULINE
3,75 6.07
dd
01/18/02
ATKINS, KATHERINE
234.88
dd
01/18/02
CORNER, AMY
40.20
dd
01/18/02
HASSENSTAB, DENISE
67.00
dd
01/18/02
HORWATH, RONALD
1,467.78
dd
01/18/02
KOEHNEN, AMY
39.60
dd
01/18/02
MARUSKA, ERICA
5 3.4 8
dd
01/18/02
WHITE, NICOLE
47.95
dd
01/18/02
WORWA, LINDSAY
92.23
dd
01/18/02
RENSLOW, RITA
238.57
dd
01/18/02
REILLY, MICHAEL
1,3 00.66
dd
01/18/02
HURLEY, STEPHEN
2,500.28
wf
87280
01/18/02
CARDINAL, ROBERT
406.20
wf
87281
01/18/02
WASILUK, JULIE
357.47
wf
87282
01/18/02
JAHN, DAVID
1,469.17
wf
87283
01/1 8/02
MORIN, TROY
150.00
wf
87284
01/18/02
GENNOW, PAMELA
450.00
wf
87285
01/18/02
MATHEYS, ALANA
3
wf
87286
01/18/02
HANSEN, LORI
1
wf
87287
01/18/02
VIETOR, LORRAINE
l , 679.13
I
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
13
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
87288
01/18/02
BECKER, RONALD
480.00
wf
87289
01/18/02
PALANK, MARY
1
wf
87290
01/18/02
RICHIE, CAROLE
1
wf
87291
01/18/02
SVENDSEN, JOANNE
1,634.98
wf
87292
01/18/02
TICHY, PAMELA
72.00
wf
87293
01/18/02
BARTZ, PAUL
2,159.72
wf
87294
01/18/02
HALEY, BRANDON
1,713.08
wf
87295
01/18/02
RYAN, MICHAEL
555.00
wf
87296
01/18/02
STEINER, JOSEPH
225.00
wf
87297
01/18/02
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2,357.26
wf
87298
01/18/02
EVERSON, PAUL
2
wf
87299
01/18/02
MEEHAN, JAMES
2,360.67
wf
87300
01/18/02
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
2,630.63
wf
87301
01/18/02
ACOSTA, MARK
840.00
wf
87302
01/18/02
AMBORN, JASON
1
wf
87303
01/18/02
ANDERSON, BRIAN
1
Wf
87304
01/18/02
BAHL, DAVID
1,252.00
wf
87305
01/18/02
BALAZS, JOSEPH
1
wf
87306
01/18/02
BAUMAN, ANDREW
1,652.00
wf
87307
01/18/02
B OE, ERICK
504.00
wf
87308
01/18/02
BOLLES, THOMAS
612.00
wf
87309
01/18/02
BOURQUIN, RON
718.00
wf
87310
01/18/02
BRAATEN, HAROLD
370.00
wf
87311
01/18/02
BROWN, TIMOTHY
365.00
wf
87312
01/18/02
RUCHE, JOETTE
2
wf
87313
01/18/02
CAHILL, CHRISTOPHER
1,123.00
wf
87314
01/18/02
CAULKINS, CHRIS
168.00
wf
87315
01/18/02
CROMETT, MARK
1, 3 3 0.00
wf
87316
01/18/02
DAWSON, RICHARD
769.50
wf
87317
01/18/02
DIETZ, EDWARD
864.00
wf
87318
01/18/02
DITTEL, MICHAEL
1,446.5 0
wf
87319
01/18/0.2
DOREE, KURT
519.00
wf
87320
01/1 8/02
DUELLMAN, AMY
1
wf
87321
01/18/02
DUELLMAN, JOSEPH
708.00
wf
87322
01/18/02
DUELLMAN, KIRK
1
wf
87323
01/18/02
EVERSON, PAUL
1,1 60.00
wf
87324
01/18/02
FASULO, WALTER
1 52.00
wf
87325
01/18/02
FETTERS, JEFFREY
2
wf
87326
01/18/02
GERARD, JAMIE
1,805.00
wf
87327
01/18/02
GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE
1
wf
87328
01/18/02
HAKSETH, NATHAN
2,082.00
wf
87329
01/18/02
HALE, JOSEPH
1
wf
87330
01/18/02
HASKINS, KEVIN
2,571.00
wf
87331
01/18/02
HEFFERNAN, PATRICK
1
wf
87332
01/18/02
HERLUND, RICK
1
wf
87333
01/18/02
HOHN, JAMES
2,350.50
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
14
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
87334
01/18/02
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
1,350.00
wf
87335
01/18/02
KANE, ROBERT
345.00
wf
87336
01/18/02
KARNOWSKI, SANDRA
2,369.50
wf
87337
01/18/02
KNABE, WILLIAM
1,266.00
wf
87338
01/18/02
KOEHN, CORY
1,,643.00
wf
87339
01/18/02
KOLASA, MARK
63 8.00
wf
87340
01/18/02
KONDER, RONALD
4,000.00
wf
87341
01/18/02
KORTUS, WILLIAM
754.00
wf
87342
01/18/02
L'ALLIER, TED
816.00
wf
87343
01/18/02
LEDMAN, KEVIN
889.50
wf
87344
01/18/02
LIDBERG, MICHAEL
1
wf
87345
01/18/02
LINN, BRYAN
432.00
wf
87346
01/18/02
LOCHEN, MICHAEL
360.00
wf
87347
01/18/02
MALLORY, GORDON
1,944.50
wf
-87348
01/18/02
MARTY, MARK
3
wf
87349
01/18/02
MARX, ERIC
1,500.00
wf
87350
01/18/02
MCGOVERN, JOHN
666.00
wf
87351
01/18/02
MELANDER, JON
1,832.50
wf
87352
01/18/02
MELLEN, RICHARD
1
wf
87353
01/18/02
MEYERS, PAUL
934.00
wf
87354
01/18/02
MILLER, NICHOLAS
936.00
wf
87355
01/18/02
MONK, JOHN
862.00
wf
87356
01/18/02
MONROY, JON
1,402.00
wf
87357
01/18/02
NALIPINSKI, STEPHEN
1,254.00
wf
87358
01/18/02
NEUMAN, BRIAN
252.00
wf
87359
01/18/02
NOLAN, PAUL
960.00
wf
87360
01/18/02
NORDBECK, CARL,
200.00
wf
87361
01/18/02
NOVAK, JEROME
5 52.00
wf
87362
01/18/02
OLSON, KENNETH
792.00
wf
87363
01/18/02
PETERSON, RICHARD
600.00
wf
87364
01/18/02
PETERSON, ROBERT
1,641.50
wf
87365
01/18/02
PETERSON, THEODORE
918.00
wf
87366
01/18/02
RICKETSON, BRENT
1,240.00
wf
87367
01/18/02
RINDAL, DONALD
592.00
wf
87368
01/18/02
ROBERTSON, STEVEN
832.00
wf
87369
01/18/02
ROMANIK, JAMES
1,608.00
wf
87370
01/18/02
SACKETT, JAMES
876.00
wf
87371
01/18/02
SCHADT, JEFFREY
1,897.50
wf
87372
01/1 8/02
SCHOENECKER, THOMAS
768.00
wf
87373
01/18/02
SCHULTZ, THOMAS
1
wf
87374
01/18/02
SEDLACEK, JEFFREY
1 ,218.00
wf
87375
01/18/02
SEVERSON, DAVID
684.00
wf
87376
01/18/02
SINGER, SCOTT
516.00
wf
87377
01/18/02
SKOK, STEPHEN
1,113.50
wf
87378
01/18/02
SMITH, KEITH
1,228.50
wf
87379
01/18/02
SMITH, RICHARD
1,178.00
14
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
15
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
87380
01/18/02
STANWAY, ROBERT
372.00
wf
87381
01/18/02
STENE, MARK
240.00
wf
87382
01/18/02
SVENDSEN, RON
1,319.00
wf
87383
01/18/02
TREPANIER, EUGENE
L566.00
wf
87384
01/18/02
TRONNES, JOHN
312.00
wf
87385
01/18/02
WALZ, JAMES
552.00
wf
87386
01/18/02
WATERS, JOSEPH
206.00
wf
87387
01/18/02
WELDON, ROBERT
624.00
wf
87388
01/18/02
WHISLER, MICHAEL
744.00
wf
87389
01/18/02
WHITE, JOEL
552.00
wf
87390
01/18/02
WILSON, JASON
1,524.50
wf
87391
01/18/02
ZASTROW, GREGG
606.50
wf
87392
01/18/02
ZIMMERMANN HORN, ANN
2,231.00
wf
87393
01/18/02
SCHWAB, TAHIRAH
0.00
wf
87393
01/1 8/02
SCHWAB, TAHIRAH
351.98
wf
87394
01/18/02
CUDE, LARRY
433.72
wf
87395
01/18/02
FREBERG, RONALD
1,753.05
wf
87396
01/18/02
JONES, DONALD
1,442.02
wf
87397
01/18/02
ELIAS, JAMES
2,136.34
wf
87398
.01/18/02
GROVER, CAROLYN
723.60
wf
87399
01/18/02
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,941.70
wf
87400
01/18/02
SCHACHT, ERIN
907.20
wf
87401
01/18/02
CARVER, JUSTIN
49.50
wf
87402
01/18/02
EDSON, DAVID
2,054.85
wf
87403
01/18/02
HELEY, ROLAND
1,842.92
wf
87404
01/18/02
HINNENKAMP, GARY
1
wf
87405
01/18/02
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1
wf
87406
01/18/02
NAUGHTON, JOHN
1
wf
-87407
01/18/02
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,442.02
wf
87408
01/18/02
O'DONOVAN, KEVIN
108.75
wf
87409
01/18/02
BERGREN, KIRSTEN
88.00
wf
87410
01/18/02
GERNES, CAROLE
162.50
wf
87411
01/18/02
BUNCE, LARRY
109.54
wf
87412
01/18/02
WENGER, ROBERT
2,179.38
wf
87413
01/18/02
ADAMS, CAILIN
40.00
wf
87414
01 /1 8/02
ANDERSON, MIKE
31.50
wf
87415
01/18/02
BANICK, STEVE
31.50
wf
87416
01/18/02
BJORK, BRANDON
185.63
wf
87417
01/18/02
CHEZIK, STACEY
45.50
wf
87418
01/18/02
CHOINIERE, ROBERT
31.50
wf
87419
01/18/02
CHRISTIANSON, SARA
220.00
wf
87420
01/18/02
DANIELS, TIMOTHY
21.00
wf
87421
01/18/02
DIEBEL, CHRISTOPHER
33.00
wf
87422
01 /1 8/02
EDMAN, BRIAN
41.00
wf
87423
01/18/02
FINN, GREGORY
2
wf
87424
01/18/02
FITCH, CYNTHIA
41.00
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
16
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
87425
01/18/02
FRANK, LAURA
284.75
Wf
87426
01/18/02
FRANK, SARAH
45.50
wf
87427
01/18/02
GEBHARD, JILLIAN
169.13
Wf
87428
01/18/02
GORE, MICHAEL
42.00
Wf
87429
01/18/02
GOULET, NICOLE
20.25
Wf
87430
01/18/02
HALLAMEK, ANTHONY
20.00
Wf
87431
01/18/02
HELKAMP, KAYLA
65.00
Wf
87432
01/18/02
HOLDER, RYAN
46.00
wf
87433
01/18/02
HORNER, JAY
33.75
Wf
87434
01/18/02
HORNER, KIMBERLY
19.50
wf
87435
01/18/02
KAREL, BRADLEY
33.00
Wf
87436
01/18/02
KAREL, JULIE
44.00
wf
87437
01/18/02
KIMLINGER, LAURA
29.00
Wf
87438
01/18/02
KINNING, KATIE
28.00
Wf
87439
01/18/02
KLEM, JOSH
60.00
wf
87440
01/18/02
MARTINUCCI, KAITLIN
19.50
Wf
87441
01/18/02
NIELSEN, ABBY
41.00
Wf
87442
01/18/02
NIEMCZYK, ANTHONY
60.00
wf
87443
01/18/02
NIEMCZYK, BRIAN
80.00
wf
87444
01/18/02
O'GRADY, BENJAMIN
21.75
Wf
87445
01/18/02
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
172.00
-wf
87446
01/18/02
RAJAN, RAJIU
44.00
'wvf
87447
01/18/02
RAPE, HOLLY
58.50
wf
87448
01/18/02
ROERING, JORDAN
32.25
Wf
87449
01/18/02
SHOBERG, KARI
294.38
wf
87450
01/18/02
THOMAS, RUSSELL
103.00
wf
87451
01/18/02
UNGAR, KRI STOPHER
104.50
Wf
87452
01/18/02
WALSH, JESSICA
21.00
wf
87453
01/18/02
ZIELINSKI, JOSEPH
42.00
Wf
87454
01/18/02
GERMAIN, DAVID
1,677.22
Wf
87455
01/18/02
HAAG, MARK
1
Wf
87456
01/18/02
NADEAU, EDWARD
3,441.62
Wf
87457
01/18/02
GLASS, JEAN
1
Wf
87458
01/1 8/02
HOIUM, SHEILA
925.84
Wf
87459
01/18/02
JONES, ANN
59.50
Wf
87460
01/18/02
MOY, PAMELA
378.67
Wf
87461
01/18/02
PARTLOW, JOSHUA
305.30
Wf
87462
01/18/02
POWERS, NICOLE
29.80
Wf
87463
01/18/02
RIDLEHOOVER, KATE
238.51
Wf
87464
01/18/02
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
1,497.86
Wf
87465
01/18/02
SHOBERG, CARY
649.16
Wf
87466
01/18/02
SKRYPEK, JOSHUA
256.50
Wf
87467
01/18/02
LINGER, MARGARET
709.52
Wf
87468
01/18/02
VELASQUEZ, ANGELA
249.73
Wf
87469
01/18/02
BACHMAN, NICOLE
99.32
Wf
87470
01/18/02
BADEN, ALISON
47.13
16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
17
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
87471
01/18/02
BRENEMAN, NEIL
58.95
wf
87472
01/18/02
CHAPMAN JENNY
157.78
Wf
87473
01 /1 8/02
COSTA, JOSEPH
98.00
wf
87474
01/18/02
CRONIN, CHAD
15.90
wf
87475
41/18/02
DEGRAW, KRYSTAL
329.95
wf
87476
01/18/02
DEMPSEY, BETH
102.25
Wf
87477
01/18/02
DIERICH, ANDREA
104.00
wf
87478
01/18/02
DUNK, RYAN
87.75
wf
87479
01/18/02
ERICKSON, CAROL
43.50
wf
87480
01/18/02
ESTES, KERI
43.75
wf
87481
01/18/02
FALKENSTEIN, MONICA
146.50
wf
87482
01/18/02
FONTAINE, ANTHONY
24.54
wf
87483
01/18/02
FONTAINE, KIM
59.40
Wf
87484
01/18/02
GREENWALT, SARAH
166.09
Wf
87485
01 / 18/02
GRUENHAGEN, LINDA
269.15
wf
87486
01/1 8/02
HAGGERTY, KATHRYN
67.70
wf
87487
01/18/02
HAGSTROM, LINDSEY
13.50
wf
87488
01/18/02
HAWKE, ASHLEY
413.61
wf
87489
01/18/02
HEINN, REBECCA
269.64
wf
87490
O l / 18/02
HEXUM, AMANDA
58.00
Wf
87491
01/18/02
HOLMGREN,` LEAH
123.50
Wf
87492
01/18/02
HOULE, DENISE
140.35
Wf
87493
01/18/02
HUPPERT, ERIN
48.00
wf
87494
01/18/02
IRISH, KARL
130.15
Wf
87495
01/18/02
JOHNSON, ROBERT
280.25
wf
87496
01/18/02
JOHNSON, SUSAN
40.50
Wf
87497
01/18/02
JOVONOVICH, TODD
72.15
wf
87498
01/18/02
JOYER, MARTI
5 8.5 0
Wf
87499
01/18/02
KASPERSON, LISA
22.75
Wf
87500
01/18/02
KERSCHNER, JOLENE
30.00
Wf
87501
01/18/02
KOEHNEN, MARY
5 51.67
Wf
87502
01/18/02
KROLL, MARK
56.80
Wf
87503
01/18/02
KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
66.03
Wf
87504
01/18/02
MCNL HON, MELISSA
75.90
wf
87505
01/18/02
MOSSONG, ANDREA
369.89
Wf
87506
01/18/02
O'REAGAN, CHRISTINE
45.31
Wf
87507
01/18/02
OLSON, ABIGAIL
27.40
Wf
87508
01/18/02
PEHOSKI, JOEL
21.60
Wf
87509
01/18/02
POWERS, JESSICA
151.73
Wf
87510
01/18/02
SCHAEFER, ROB
46.24
Wf
87511
01/18/02
SIMONSON, JUSTIN
141.57
Wf
87512
01/18/02
SMITLEY, SHARON
228.60
Wf
87513
01/18/02
SWANER, JESSICA
24.34
Wf
87514
01/18/02
TUPY, HEIDE
18.00
Wf
87515
01/18/02
TUPY, MARCUS
167.50
Wf
87516
01/18/02
WARNER, CAROLYN
1 29.60
17
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
87517
01/18/02
WEDES, CARYL
62.30
wf
87518
01/18/02
WELTER, ELIZABETH
152.73
wf
87519
01/18/02
WHITE, TIMOTHY
154.35
wf
87520
01/18/02
WOODMAN, ALICE
114.50
wf
87521
01/18/02
ZIELINSKI JENNIFER
65.70
wf
87522
01/18/02
BOSLEY, CAROL.
220.58
wf
87523
01/18/02
ESALA, HOPE
12.00
wf
87524
01/18/02
GROPPOLI, LINDA
222.33
wf
87525
01 / 18/02
HANSEN, ANNA
108.00
wf
87526
01/18/02
HUPPERT, ERICA
184.88
wf
87527
01/18/02
LARKIN, JENNIFER
6.50
wf
87528
01/18/02
SCHROEDER, KATHLEEN
290.40
wf
87529
01/1 8/02
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
1 04.00
wf
87530
01/18/02
BEHAN, JAMES
1
wf
87531
01/18/02
DIXON, NICOLE
104.80
wf
87532
01/18/02
DOUGLASS, TOM
383.50
wf
87533
01/18/02
HEGG, MICHELLE
213.60
wf
87534
01/18/02
KOSKI, JOHN
1,093.70
wf
87535
01/18/02
KYRK, ASHLEY
36.25
wf
87536
01/18/02
LESLIE, DUSTIN
238.05
wf
87537
01/18/02
LONETTI, JAMES
822.35
wf
87538
01 /1 8/02
PATTERSON, ALBERT
841.73
wf
87539
01/18/02
PETERSON, LYNDSAY
93.40
wf
87540
01/18/02
PRINS, KELLY
696.30
wf
87541
01/18/02
SARPONG, SEAN
269.30
wf
87542
01/18/02
SCHMIDT, WILLIAM
272.65
wf
87543
01/18/02
SCHULZE, BRIAN
214.02
Wf
87544
01/18/02
SEVERSON, HOLLY
135.85
wf
87545
01/18/02
YOUNG, MATTHEW
185.90
wf
87546
01/18/02
AICHELE, CRAIG
1,489.06
wf
87547
01/18/02
MULVANEY DENNIS
1,838.98
wf
87548
01/18/02
PRIEM, STEVEN
1,711.86
501,225.68
Agenda # (1�-1
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Shann Finwall, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review — Used Automobile Sales
LOCATION: 2525 White Bear Avenue
DATE: January 22, 2002
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council.
Date
E ndorsed
Modified
Rejecte
Two conditional use permits (CUPs) for the sale of used automobiles at the Maplewood Auto
Center (2525 White Bear Avenue) are due for review. The CUPs allow two used automobile
sales businesses to operate as tenants within the existing auto center.
BACKGROUND
On November 22, 1999, the city council- approved a CUP for one used automobile sales
business (currently operating as Midwest Auto Works) for this location, subject to six conditions.
Refer to the council minutes starting, on page 5.
On July 9, 2001, the city council approved a CUP for a second used automobile sales business
( as Equity Car Care and Sales, Inc.) for this location, subject to six
conditions. Refer to the council minutes starting on page 7.
DISCUSSION
Midwest Auto Works
Chris Palmer of Midwest Auto Works took over the Original 1999 used automobile sales CUP
from a previous business on August 1, 2000. Condition No. 6 of the original CUP states, "No
large transport vehicles are allowed on the site." Mr. Palmer is requesting that the _city remove
this condition so that used automobiles can be delivered to Midwest Auto Works business via
car carriers.
Mr. Palmer states that used automobiles are purchased from auctions and transported to the
site via large transport. Midwest Auto Works then refurbishes the automobiles and advertises
them for sale on the Internet. Customers rarely come to the site to view or purchase the
automobiles. Mr. Palmer further explains that the second used automobile sales CUP on the
site (Equity Car Care and Sales, Inc.) does not have this condition attached to their CUP. Mr.
Palmer further explains that the Super America business located within the Maplewood Auto
Center currently receives gasoline deliveries via large transport.
Condition No. 1 of the CUP states, "The director of community development may approve minor
changes." The community development director has reviewed condition number six with staff
and agrees that the delivery of used automobiles to the Maplewood Auto Center is similar to
Super America's current practice of receiving gasoline deliveries via large transport. Because of
this, used automobiles transported to the site via large transport will not have an adverse effect
on the property. Therefore, staff believes that having vehicle transports on the site is not a
concern. ,
Equity Car Care Sales,
James Moryn of Equity Car Care and Sales, Inc., took over the 2001 used automobile sales
CUP from a previous business on January 2, 2002 (see the attached letter on page 9).
Condition No. 6 of the original CUP states, "There shall not be any vehicles displayed in the
parking lot with for sale signs or any other forms of vehicle sale display or graphics." Mr. Moryn
is requesting that the city remove this condition for Equity Car Care and Sales, Inca so that they
can display information sheets on the dashboard of used automobiles that are for sale.
Equity Car Care and Sales, Inc. advertise their used automobiles in the newspaper and auto
sales magazines. Prospective buyers call the business to set up a viewing appointment.
Mr. Moryn states that the information sheets would separate their vehicles from other vehicles in
the auto mall, eliminating customer confusion. Mr. Moryn further states that it will help lend to a
low- pressure sales environment.
Condition No. 1 of the CUP states, "The director of community development may - approve minor
changes." The community. development director has reviewed condition number 6 and staff
agrees that the display of information sheets would not adversely effect the property as long as
the information sheets are kept to 8 -1/2" x 11" in size and are only displayed on the dashboard.
Therefore, staff will allow the operator to place one 8-1/2 11 x 11 " information sheet in the interior
of each vehicle.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the two conditional use permits for used automobile sales at 2525 White Bear Avenue
again only if a problem arises,or if the owner or operators request a major change to the site or
to the conditions.
p : sec 111M idwest -eq u ity. cu p
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Council Minutes Dated November 22, 1999
4. Council Minutes Dated July 9, 2001.
5. Equity Car's Correspondence Dated January 15, 2002
Attachment 1
N
.P� 1
Maplewood Auto Center
Location Map
3
Attachment 2.
1 I
C GUNTY ROAD C __ -
1 - 230 _.. 3 I Z.4 Z . ;!
-- - -
w c
135 3030 180 180.6 j 0 %
OD
I o 2 4 `^ I h ti r
r r r .6 s� ► :'� .83ati
( 1 — - h .1 6C \ J 4
2 0 = 23 r 37 2 1862 ' " 1876 �' CAR 'MASH METRO LAWN &
1 8 0 0 _ 0 4 zz o C a POWER EQUIPMENT
2
-z2s) _ _
22 i 3 o�.
3 = 9'
179 s ,.4� �... 9 KENNETH'S
s 2 4 _ - �-- HAM STYLING
4 - 4s .... !�� 33 s DAVID H. HESLEY
�� 20 5
r ,� ° - 4 — 0 , . G CPA
5 0 !8 79 ! ro to O _ r; i in .�2 ot. tom' i r 1 t5;
1 7 z . � ' ��"► ���) MESHBESHER &
e, ` 6 v o
( "' S.PEN.CE LAWYERS
0Z, 9 �.
6C) /19 t .04
v h A H11f1L�"�1Y
a N 7 w S
h 2.1 Z. t 3to
�h •� S� OFFICES
t � c
ti ,� tit g r-,
17 v z Co � Ca a - rosr+.� r 9) r ' ,/
�.
M
loop
r _ •� -.•.. i
rl
'r�
:.. SUPER A11�fEF�fCA.
4Q.
,,Q : ::a -: ::: �ti • :i'.v;: } } rtiti:...,v,. -.�.• ;• „rYti :R� .•.s.•.: %.•: ?":.•.: • •..,.,. 7 f 1
Q V {:ti ':r r..•} � •::.•;• }:: ,r,•; .; tip?. y :: .:::•.•:: •.2::•�'• .1r . r �.Y : .;:. '
r ..
V _
A
V A
•:4ti
•: r
C
.r
r
4 ..:
•Y
S '::S•
I
•: L
0 � if: �'��'• �<�?.: • - - • tea: :. •• mss::.... Q
OF FICE S
j: :f. :.::<.. E AUTO CENTER _
� � I APLE;J� O -
v, --- ---------- ........ __
1 ./ ::•:Y: f••' S' }:•: � } } } :.5:... •S.S ... • } :• }:•:? ::: ❖:• i ❖:•:•: ?. } : :•: LY;: : } }••• }; • .Yf .Y :.•: '' S:..•• .Y••. O :. • ::.•Y..
/ .•. {..,.,., {Y�:..•.:• :};??.}:.•}::::•:•: v:•::.•.:•.•:{.; • {;;;:'.;.ti.•' ?:'�::tiv:}�.•r ,•':::•:ti?tiv:. .•oar•;,•, {:.v�w;;i, r
C ;:2 :: • •• }:ti; >: {:�•';;::: ? ?ib: :: Y.v }:•:v •'••.•::?Y:•: r:• •.• :o ?:•: {'r,. h• : ::e:.•.,..v }::• } ?.•Y} }}.Y.Y •r. 1C ..
4 {.ti .,f.?•T • •o '• •�::,r.• hr,.:•:•; o }•} ;•� : : } }• • :::: � •� 1 t t
r r..::.:Y: :.. • ✓A L t
zzl
LO
t•� ..:r.
r '
�./ i t'
�
� _ N
205, z 98' ,
I
� I
or¢
NTB 4�
•• f t
'
a
MAPLERIDGE P
J
SH=IPPI=NG
lr
CENTER
r !
a
7
,
—� op
_
,• I
f o x
o �
t
I
RAIN BOW
FOODS
PROFESSIONAL
l0 7 0 /11 31
BUtLDIN —
,
in is
GERVAIS AVENUE.
711 QRI
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
4
t
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL Attachment 3
'+ 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 22,1999
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 99 -26
2. 7:18 P.M. Used Car Sales Conditional Use Permit - Maplewood Auto Ctr. (2525 White Bear Avenue)
a. Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. Manager McGuire introduced the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Frost presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Cit y Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings.
f. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing, calling for proponents of opponents. No one was
heard.
g. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing.
en moved /introduced the following Resolution, Councilmenhber Kopp � approving a conditional use permit for
used sales at Maplewood - Auto enter, - 2525 White Bear Avenue tor a six month period of time. At that time
app icant w ill be required to come betbre Council at that time and move its adoption:
99 -11 -109
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Dale Martin, of Credit Equity Sales, applied for a conditional use permit for-motor vehicle sales at the
Maplewood Auto Center:
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 2525 White Bear Avenue. The legal
description is:
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS: N 280 FEET OF
LOT 2 & ALL OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1, MAPLE RIDGE MALL
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On November 1, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this pen
11 -22 -99
5
2. On November 22, 1 999, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and
sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and
present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional use permit based
on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's
comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be
dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive
noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or
unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection,
drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the
development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null
and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. There shall not be any vehicles displayed in the parking lot with "for sale" signs, flags, pennants or any other forms
of car -sale display or graphics.
5. Car sales on the site shall be by appointment only as proposed, not on a drop -by retail basis.
6. No Large transport vehicles allowed on the site.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach Ayes - all
11 -22 -99
CIk
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
Attachment 4
7:00 P.M. Monday, July 9, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 01 -14
1. 7:00 P.M Credit Equity Sales Conditional Use Permit (2525 White Bear Avenue)
a. Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the staff report.
C. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
d. Commissioner Paul Mueller presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following person was heard:
Julie Berry, 2361 Oak Lane, employee at Credit Equity Sales
Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution that approves a
conditional use permit for used motor vehicle sales at Maplewood Auto Center,
2525 White Bear Avenue. Approval is based on the finding required by the code
and subject to
RESOLUTION 07 -01 -061
Credit Equity Sales -- Conditional Use Permit
WHEREAS, Dale Martin, of Credit Equity Sales, applied for a conditional
use permit for motor vehicle sales at the Maplewood Auto Center:
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 2525 White Bear
Avenue. The legal description is:
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS: N 280 FEET OF LOT 2 &ALL OF LOT 1
BLOCK 1, MAPLE RIDGE MALL (PIN 11- 29 -22 -22 -0040)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 18, 2001 the planning commission recommended that the city
council approve this permit.
2. On July 9, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff
published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports
and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve
the above - described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans.
The city approved this permit because:
7
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated
to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of
ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or
methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental,
disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would
not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by, adequate \ public facilities and services, including
streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems,
schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or
services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this
deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. There shall not be any vehicles displayed in the parking lot with "for sale" signs
or any other forms of vehicle -sale display or graphics.
5. Vehicle sales shall be by appointment only, not on a drop -by retail basis.
6. The owner or operator shall get a certificate of occupancy from the city before
occupying the space.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes —All
Attachment 5
EQUITY CAR CARE & SAFES INC.
2525 WHITE BEAR AVE, STE 11 0
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
631 - 770 -0592
1/15/2002
TD: MRS. SHAD N FINWALL
RE: CHANGE OF BUSINESS PER USE PERM/ i
MRS. FINWALL,
This letter is to inform the City of Maplewood of recent changes to business taking place
in the Maplewood Auto Mall, 2525 White Bear Ave, Ste 11 0, Maplewood, Mn 55109.
The city has on record a conditional use permit for Credit Equity Sales, owned by Dale
Martin, which conducted business as a used car appointment sales and prep shop. I would
like to request that the existing use permit be transferred to my new business Ea,,
C@jr, & Sales Inc. for the same purposes of conducting the same type of business. I have
read a copy of the use permit and am aware of what the City of Maplewood expects of
the company in day to day operations. I would also like to request the following changes
to the use permit at this time.
One of the conditions in the use permit was there shall not be any vehicles displayed in
the lot with "tor sale" signs, flags, pennants or any other forms of car -sate display or
graphics. This was to eliminate traffic in the auto mall due to retail sales of vehicles due
to drop -by customers. I would like to request permission to place information sheets on
the dash of the vehicles in lieu of for sale signs, These sheets would be placed flat on the
vehicles dash and would only be observed by customers already viewing vehicles. These
sheets would not be viewable from white Bear Avenue therefore should not increase
unneeded or unwanted traffic in the auto mall. The information sheets would contain
pertinent information specaic to the vehicle and would not include the words "for sale ".
The sheets also separate my vehicles from others in the auto mall and eliminates
customer confusion. The company also boasts a low pressure sales envirorunent and
having info sheets in the vehicles help us maintain this as they act as sales people in our
absence. I feel that permission to display these information sheets would greatly improve
business and would not jeapordize the conditions in the conditional use permit with the
City of Maplewood.
Your reply and comments in this, matter would be greatly appreciated. Please inform me
of any formal requests I need to a to allow these changes if possible.
Nioryn
sident
Equity Car care & sales Inc.
AGENDA nTM N
To Cit Mana
From Colleen J . Callahan
n
A
Sub Acceptance of a a o
Date: December 13, 00 00
A Dum
N
Action b Council
Date
Endorsed
Back Modified
Re
Durin our annual United Wa campai week, the South Office and Station 4 hosted a fund
raiser for 911 Relief.. A cop of an announcement postcard is attached for y our review.
Part of the fundraiser included a silent auction. To trucks were purchased and customized
for the silent auction. The North Maplewood Lioness Club is donated the funds to pa for
these to This donation will allow us to g ive 100% of the funds raised b the silent auction
to the 911 Relief Fund. Approximatel $600.00 was raised durin the event.
Recommendation
Accept the donation. Publicl thank the North Maplewood Lioness Club for their
I contribution.
1:1
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA NO
Action b Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
TO: Cit Mana Re
FROM* Colleen Callahan, Co Services Coordinator
RIE'S HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION REAPPOINTMENTS
DATE.* December 4,, 2001
1HN'qT,R0DUC11 ..
Gordie Hei n i*n g er and Tamm Ndzieia's terms expire December 31, 2001. Gordie was
first appointed in Januar 199 1. Tamm was appointed in Januar of 2001 to fill a
vacanc created* b a member resi n.
it is recommended, unanimousl b the Human Relations Commission Members, that
these members be reappointed to a three-,. term each which would expire on
12/31/2003,
AGENDAITEM Np C
�
J
Action by Council
7
Date
MEMORANDUM Endor -ed
Modified
Rejected
TO: City Manager
FROM: Melinda Coleman, Assistant City Manager MX/
SUBJECT: Ramsey County Fair Board - Allocation of Funds
DATE: January 18, 2001
INFORMATION
At the December 17, 2001 city council meeting, staff was directed to provide additional
funds to the Ramsey County Fair Board for fireworks. Staff was asked to research the
availability of funds and if necessary provide the funds from the Contingency Fund,
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize a transfer of $3 500. from the
Contingency Fund for the Ramsey County Fair Board for fireworks.
Agenda 9. .
MEMORANDUM "on by Council
Date
TO: Richard Fursman, C' a er Endorsed
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson ct o nd Recreation Rejmwd
DATE: January 10, 2002 for e J _u , 2002 City Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Joint Powers Agreement between the Cities of Maplewood and Oakdale
regarding the Operation of Skyview Pool and Tanners Beach
INTRODUCTION
The city of Maplewood has provided administrative aquatic services for the city of Oakdale for
the past three years. The administrative agreement requires MCC staff to hire, train and
manage all personnel to work at Skyview pool on Tuesday and Wednesday evenings from 7 -9
p.m. and Sunday from 12 -6 p.m. year -round and manage and operate Tanners Beach from
June to August
BACKGROUND
The Maplewood Community Center aquatic staff coordinates one of the largest lesson and
leisure indoor pool programs in the metropolitan area. They currently provide instruction to
over 4,000 young people on an annual basis, as well as managing two beaches and Skyview
pool. The program is coordinated by Linda Crosson, recreation program coordinator.
Two years ago, the city of Oakdale requested that we, provide aquatic services for the
management of Skyview pool and Tanners Beach. The program has proven to be very
beneficial to both communities.
The proposed joint powers agreement is for a one -year period and remains basically the same
as in prior years. The only change is the annual administrative fee, which has increased by
$1,500 or approximately 11 %. The rate has not increased over the past two years and the
increase reflects general inflationary costs.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council enter into the proposed joint powers agreement as
reviewed and drafted by the city attorney between the cities of Oakdale and Maplewood
regarding the operation of Skyview pool and Tanners Beach.
kdtoakdale.mem
c: Linda Crosson, Rec. Prog. Coor.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN,
THE CITY OF OAKDALE AND THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
REGUARDING THE OPERATION OF SKYVIEW POOL AND TANNERS BEACH
1. This agreement, made and entered into on the day and year hereinafter set forth by the City of Maplewood/
Maplewood Community Center (MCC) and the City of Oakdale (Oakdale) both of which are governmental
subdivisions of the State of Minnesota.
PURPOSE
2. Oakdale is desirous of having the MCC hire, train, and manage all personnel to work at Skyview pool on Tuesday
and Wednesday evening from 7 p.m. and Sunday from 12 -6 p.m. year - round, and at Tanners Beach from June —
August.
AGREEMENT
Now, therefore in consideration of the mutual understanding herein expressed, the City of Oakdale and the City of
Maplewood agree as follows:
3. The MCC shall provide the following services:
a. Determine the hours of operation for Tanners Beach and beach program based on Oakdale
recommendation. In the event of poor weather conditions, the MCC will be responsible for the
decision of closing the beach and or / canceling programs... MCC will also be responsible for
opening and closing the beach facility on a daily basis and administration of keys to personnel.
b. Develop Oakdale's aquatic programs schedule. MCC will submit program information to
Oakdale before publication.
C. Recruit, interview, hire, trains and evaluates all aquatic staff. Aquatic staff shall consist of
lifeguards, swim instructors, swim aides and concession attendants. MCC will hire, evaluate,
discipline and terminate employees.
d. Manage pay records and issue paychecks to all aquatic personnel working at Skyview pool and
Tanners Beach.
e. Ensure employees working at Skyview pool or Tanners Beach are employed by the City of
Maplewood and follow Maplewood personnel policies. Employees must meet the minimum
requirements to work in the appropriate positions
Lifeguards - current certification in Red Cross Lifeguard Training
- current certification on C.P.R. for the Professional Rescuer
Swim Instructor - current certification in Red Cross Water Safety Instructor
- current certification on C.P.R. for the Professional Rescuer
authorized instructor in the St. Paul Red Cross Chapter
Swim Aides - current certification in Red Cross Water Safety Aide
f. Comply with the following standards related to the swim lesson program.
(1.) At no time should any class or part of a class be unattended. .
(2.) A lifeguard must be on duty during and between all classes and programs.
(3.) The maximum instructor to child ration should be as follows:
Parent/child classes 1:10
Preschool classes 1:6 -
Youth classes 1:10
Adult classes 1:6
g. Monitor aquatic personnel certification to ensure that all certifications remain current. Expired
certifications will result in being released from duties.
h. Administer water examinations for all lifeguards.
i. Conduct a minimum of four in- service training sessions each year. In- services consist of both in
and out of water training sessions. Attendance at these in- service training sessions will be
mandatory. Lifeguarding, teaching or swimming skills will be evaluated at the "in water" in-
service and information vital to the success of the aquatic program will be given . at the "dry -
lands" in- services.
j. Review and visit the Oakdale sites to critique and advise staff and operations and to gather input
form participants.
k. Critique staff by either conducting "on-the-job" evaluations for lifeguards of critiquing a class for
swim instructors and aides.
1. Ensure staff follows all policies and procedures as authorized providers of the St. Paul Chapter of
the American Red Cross.
M. Maintain all course records and any other information required by the St. Paul Red Cross
Chapter.
n. Establish all class schedules and program fees with input from Oakdale.
o. Review enrollment and make decisions relating to class status.
P. Oversee the daily upkeep of the aquatic facilities and communicate all maintenance needs
iYnmediately to Oakdale.
q. Administer aquatic program evaluations and provide a copy of the summary to Oakdale.
4. The City of Oakdale shall provide the following services:
a. Supply MCC with brochure timeline dates for a one -year period..
b. Obtain concession and facility permits for Skyview pool and Tanners Beach for running
programs and conduction staff trainings.
C. Advertise aquatic programs in Oakdale Update newsletter.
d. Handle all swim lessons and aquatic programs registrations. Oakdale will allow Maplewood
residents to register at the resident rate and Maplewood will allow Oakdale residents to enroll at
the resident rate.
e. Supply the MCC staff with class list one week prior to the start of class. Communicate to
participants when there are changes to their classes. (For example, classes are cancelled due to
low enrollment or the pool or beach is closed due to mechanical problems or weather.)
f. Maintain the pool, locker room beach and beach facility.
g. Reimburse the City of Maplewood for lifeguard, swim instructor, swim aide and concession staff
salaries ( as outlined by City of Maplewood) on a quarterly basis. Reimburse the City of
Maplewood for expenses needed for the operation of the concession stand, beach or pool.
h. The City of Oakdale hereby agrees to provide the City of Maplewood with an annual
administrative fee of$14,000, payable quarterly in payments of $3,500 each. The City of
Oakdale will retain all registration fees for swimming and aquatic programs al well as and
concession revenues from Tanners Beach.
2
i. The City of Oakdale agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Maplewood, its officers
and employees from any liability, claims, damages, cost, judgement and expenses including
attorney's fees resulting directly or indirectly from an act of mission with respect to the
suitability, design, usual maintenance, and operations of the facilities provided by and maintained
by the City of Oakdale and its agents. The City of Oakdale represents that said facilities are
suitable for the coordination and for the aquatic programs.
j. All policies of the insurance shall provide that the insurance company will notify the City of
Maplewood at lease thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of any policy cancellation ,
modification, or non - renewal.
k. The City of Oakdale agrees to comply with the Minnesota Data Practices Act and all other State
and Federal laws relating to data privacy of confidentiality. The City of Oakdale will
imm ediately report to the City of Maplewood any request from third parties for information
relating to this agreement. The City of Oakdale agrees to promptly respond to inquiries from the
City of Maplewood concerning data requests. The City of Oakdale agrees to hold the City of
Maplewood, its officers, and employees harmless for claims resulting from the City of Oakdale's
unlawful disclosure of use of data protected under State of Federal laws.
1. The City of Oakdale agrees to abide by the requirements of the American with Disabilities Act of
1990 (ADA), the Human Rights Ace (Minnesota Chapter 363), and (Title7) of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964. These laws deal with discrimination bases on race, gender, disability, religion,
sexual preference and sexual harassment. Violation of any of the above laws can lead to
termination of this agreement.
5. Notices
Any notice, demand correspondence that is authorized and required under the agreement shall be in
writing , shall be sent by hand or delivered certified mail the other party as follows:
IN WITNESS W IEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed effective January
2, 2002 and will be reviewed on a yearly basis by both parties.
CITY OF OAKDALE
Dated:
Dated: :
By:
Mayor
AND
By:
City Administrator
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
B
AND
Mayor
By:
City Manager
P: \SHARED \COM CTR\LINDA\AQUATIC \OAKDALEVoint Powers Agreement.doc
3
Agenda G8
M
M
Action by Council
TO: Richard Fursman -i
FROM: Bruce K. Anderso
Recreation
DATE: January 22, 2002 firth Jkvl bp 28, 2002 City Council Meeting
I
SUBJECT: Reappointment of Parks and Recreation Commissioners
INTRODUCTION
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission is a nine - member citizen advisory committee
that provides recommendations on all parks and recreation acquisition, development and policy`
matters to the City Council. The Parks and Recreation Commission meets on the third Monday of
each month. The Commission consists of nine members serving three -year terms which are
alternated on an annual basis.
BACKGROUND
There are three commission candidates up for reappointment for 2002. The three commissioners
are as follows:
Peter Fischer
Mr. Fischer was appointment to the commission in May 1993. Peter lives at 2443 Standridge
Avenue adjacent to Maplewood Heights Park. Peter has been the chairperson for the past six years
and was actively involved in the park and open space referendum. Peter is extremely committed to
working on parks and recreation issues and has been active in other community events as well.
Carolyn Peterson
Ms. Peterson lives at 1999 Jackson Street and was initially appointed to the commission in October
1994. Carolyn lives adjacent to Sandy Lake. This is a major project for the city and she has been
intimately aware of this project not only living by the property, but also being involved in the
Regional Water Authority as well. Carolyn is also involved in the Maplewood Historical Society as
well as other community activities and events. Carolyn was an original member of the open space
task force.
Craig Brannon
Mr. Brannon lives at 2827 Walter Street and was originally appointed to the commission in May
1995. Craig has four children and is very involved in our recreation programs. He has served as a
youth athletic coach and was intimately involved in the acquisition and development of Sunset
Ridge Park. Craig brings a fresh, innovative perspective to the Parks and Recreation Commission.
i have forwarded a letter (see attached) to the three commissioners and they have each indicated
their willingness to serve an additional three -year term on the parks and recreation commission.
Reappointment of Commissioners
Page 2
January 22, 2002
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Peter Fischer, Carolyn Peterson and Craig Brannon all be reappointed for a
three -year term to the Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission.
kdlreappt02.comm
,
Mr. Craig Brannon :
2927 Walter Street
Maplewood, M.N 55109
Dear Craig:
This is -a short note to.inform you that your term on the Parks and Recreation Commission
Officially expires on 12/31/01. The City Council will appoint commissioners to new three -year
terms at.their first regularly scheduled meeting on January 14, 2002:
The Parks , and, Recreation .Commission has , greatly benefited from your leadership. and
experience. I hope that you will consider extending your term for an additional three years.
J realize the tremendous commitment that the commission commands and hope that your
schedule.dan accommodate continuing this community service.
If you are in serving, on the commission for another three -year term, please forward
a short note to my. , attention and I will pass it on, to, the City Council for their consideration on
January .14, 2002.
Should you have any., questions, please contact me directly at..(651)770 -4573.
. c el ,
AA
ruce K. A ers
Director of Parks a Recreation
BRUCE.K.ANDERSON adC1. PLEWOOD.MN.US
kd \brannon2,Itr01.comm
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 651-770 FAX: 651- 770 - 4506
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
I
December 11, 2001
Ms. Carolyn. Peterson
1999 Jackson Street
Maplewood, M N 55
Dear Carolyn:
This is a short note to inform you that your term on the Parks and Recreation Commission
officially expires ires on 12/31/01. The City Council will appoint commissioners to new three-year-
terms at their first regularly scheduled meeting on January 14, 2002.
The 'Parks and Recreation Commission has greatly benefited from your leadership and
experience. P erience. I hope that you will consider extending your term for, an additional three years.
realize the tremendous commitment that the commission commands and hope that your
schedule can accommodate continuing this community service.
If you are interested in, serving on the commission for another three -year term, please forward
a shorn note to my attention and I will pass it on to the City Council for their consideration on
January 14, 2002.
Should you have any questions, please contact me'directly at (65.1)770-4573.
Sincerely,
race K. AndeFsd'n'_
Director of Parks and ecreation
BRUCE.K.ANDERSON @CI. OOD.MN.US
k0\petersn2.1tr01.comm
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 651-770-4570 FAX: 651- 770 - 4506
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD. MN 55109
December. 11 2001
Mr. Peter M.. Fischer
2443 Standridge Avenue
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Peter:
This is a short note to inform you that your term on.the Parks and Recreation Commission
Officially expires on 12/31./01. The City Council will appoint commissioners to new three-year-
terms -at their first regularly scheduled meeting on January 14, 2002.
The Parks and Recreation Commission has greatly benefited from your leadership and
experience. I hope that you will consider extending your, term for an additional three years.
realize the tremendous commitment that the commission commands and hope that your
schedule. accommodate continuing this community service.
If you are interested in serving on the commission for another three =year term, please forward
a short note to my, attention and I will pass it on to the City Council for their consideration on
January 14,"2002.
Should you have any. questions, please contact me directly at :(651)770- 4573. .
Sincerely,
Bruce K. Anderson
Director of Parks and Recreation
BRUCE .K.ANDERSON @CI.MAPLEWOOD.MN.US
kd %scher2.Itr01.comm
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 651- 770 - 4570 FAX: 651 - 770 - 4506
CITY; OF MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST COUNTY LOAD B' MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
Maplewood Fire
Department
Memo
AGENDA REPORT
To: Richard Fursman, City er
From: Steve Lukin, Fire Chie �''
CC: City Clerk
Date: 01/22/2002
Re: Purchase of Staff Vehicle
Action by Council
Date M 101
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected J
INTRODUCTION
Money was allocated in the 2002 budget to purchase a staff vehicle.
BACKGROUND
We will be purchasing a 2002 Dodge Durango that will replace a 1989 Chevrolet Caprice. The need to
go to the larger size vehicle is because of the amount of equipment carried in the staff vehicles. The
trunk space in the present Crown Victoria doesn't meet our needs. This vehicle �.r�as to be put on the
State bid, and at the last minute, the State chose to use the Jeep Cherokee instead.
We received have two bids; one from White Bear Dodge in the amount.-of $28,990 and the other from
Lake Elmo Chrysler for $28,388.
RECOMMENDATION
It is my recommendation to the Council to purchase the 2002 Dodge Durango from Lake Elmo Chrysler
in the amount of $28,388 and direct the Finance Department to made the necessary budget transfer.
1
AGENDA NO. GAD
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: SEWER BACKUP DAMAGES
DATE: January 23, 2002
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The attached letter from Scott Schreiber requests payment of $1,024.99 for
personal property damaged by a sewer backup at his residence on 11- 25 -01.
The amount requested exceeds the $750 limit per incident in the Small Claims
Policy adopted by the City Council on 4- 28 -97. A copy of this policy is attached.
Because of the circumstances relating to this claim it is recommended that the
City Council authorize payment of this claim.
C \agn \sewerbackupdamages.doc
fi , ,
11K)2
SCOTT SCHREBER
1439 Sherren Avenue East,
Maplewood, MN 55109
Home 651-748-0749
Office 651 -962-1245
Scott. Schre'iber@usbank.corn
December 28, 20 01 1
Richard Fursm'an
Maplewood City Hall
1830 Count Road B East,
Maplewood, MN 55109
651- 770 -4525
Dear Friend,
This letter Is in re to propert dama on November 25, 2001 when the cit sewer backed up at the
residence of 1439 Sherren Avenue East., Maplewood, MN 55109. 1 spoke to y ou, Richard Fursman, the
week of December 101 2001 and was instructed to submit a letter listin the items dama As an
additional note I left phone messa for the Cit Clerk be November 26, 2001 throu December
101 2001 at various times, finall reachin y ou the week of December 10, 2001. 1 do understand she was
ver bus performin recounts from the November primar The followin is the list of items dama
• Northern Pine Christmas Tree 6'5" ( value $130.00
• Christmas decorations, some antui ( value $40.00
• One throw ru ( value $15.00
• 30 to 40 audio cassettes @ $1.00 a piece ( value $30.00 - $40.00
• Table ironnin board ( value $9.99
3 pictures valued at $50.00 a piece, Ansel Adams, others various artists ( value $150.00
• Aiwa CD/Cassette stereo s ( value $250.00
• Van Heusen sweater (value $40.00
• Full size bed comforter ( value $50.00
• Berber Carpet-tiles ( value $250.00
• Miscellaneous moldin and trim pieces ( value $50.00
Total value $1024.99
As a resident of Maplewood I appreciate the help received from our cit offices durin this incident. If y ou
have an q uestions please don't hesitate to ask ( numbers listed above
Sincerel
Scott Schreiber 0
<
01
/0,
Replaces p revious Agenda Item .J -8.
p p g .
Agenda Item - S.
AGENDA REPORT gation by Counoil b
Endorse
TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager �j A�-44
Modifie 675b
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk }�
Dat -
w
DATE: April 15, 1997 7 S�
RE: Small Claims Policy
The philosophy of the City extended to its constituents, is to provide quality customer service..
On occasion, our insurance carrier denies claims when the City has no legal obligation to pay,
due to "spontaneous arising conditions." Although there may not be a legal obligation for the
City to pay in a given situation, City staff is recommending the implementation of a "Small
Claims Policy" to allow reimbursement of certain claims arising from conditions beyond the
foreseeability _and control of the City.
Attached is a proposed policy for reimbursing small claims and a claims release form to be used
that will release the City from future responsibility when claims are paid.
It is recommended the city council approve the attached policy and release form
authorizing staff to implement the policy effective immediately.
/O 00 0 /0 /1 000-
Lf 91
City of Maplewood
Small Claims Policy
1. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR POLICY
The philosophy of the City emended to its constituents is to provide quality
customer service. On occasion, our insurance carrier denies claims when the
City has no legal obligation to pay, due to "spontaneous arising conditions."
Although there may not be a legal obligation for the City to pay in a given
situation, City staff may recommend reimbursement of certain claims arising
from conditions beyond the foreseeability and control of the City, failure to
respond or action taken by the City.
11. POLICY
When claims are received and sent to the insurance carrier for processing, they
will also be evaluated by the affected Department Head and the City Clerk.
After evaluation, the City Manager will be provided with a recommendation
for approval of payment.
An appropriation of $10,000 from the general fund contingency account will
be established with a $750 limit for any one incident. This amount may be
reviewed from time to time and changed by the City Council. Recipients of
these funds will be required to sign a disclaimer that releases the City from any
future responsibility.
This policy does not in any way conflict with nor can it be used in addition to
the City of Maplewood 's Sanitary Sewer Back-up Cleaning Policy.
111. PROCEDURE
1. The City Clerk will receive and process claims as currently established. The
affected Department Head will be given a copy of the claim. If it is deemed
probable that the insurance carrier will deny the claim, at the discretion of
City staff, reimbursement from the contingency account could be made.
When the City pays a claim, the insurance carrier will be notified: In the event
the carrier decides the claim is eligible for processing and payment, the amount
already reimbursed. by the City to the claimant, will be withheld from the
amount paid by our carrier to the claimant.
2. Claimant will sign a notarized "Claim Release" form releasing the City from
future responsibility and submit receipts not to exceed $500 for
reimbursement. Receipts will be submitted to the Finance Department for
payment.
1V. AUTHORITY
Administrative implementation of policy that has been reviewed by the City
Council.
Submitted by
Submitted by
Date
Date
z
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
RELEASE
III FULL OF ALL CLAIMS
I, (we)
in consideration of the sum of
Releasor, being of legal age, for and
Dollars ($ ) lawful money of the United
States of America to me in hand paid, the receipt. whereof is hereby acknowle '
p y ged, have remised,
released and forever discharged, and by these presents do form self, m heirs m executors
. Y Y � y ,
administrators, successors and assigns, remise, release and forever discharge the City of
g y
Maplewood, its elected representatives, agents, successors and assigns, administrators and
employees and all other. persons, firms or corporations of and from an and eve claim dema
y every �
right or cause of action, of whatever kind or nature, J by reason of personal injuries , illness , disease
or damage to property' sustained by me as a result of a certain incident, accident, casualt y or event
which occurred on or about the day of , 19 at or
near
As further consideration for making of said settlement and payment, it is expressly
warranted and agreed
p
(1) That no promise or agreement not herein expressed has been made to me and in
executing this release I am not relying upon any statement or representation made
to me by the party or parties released herein or by a one who has acted for them
or on their behalf, but I am relying solely upon my own judgment;
(2) That I understand fully that this is a final disposition of the disputes both as to the
legal liability for said accident, casualty or event and as to the nature and extent of
the injury, illness, disease and /or damage which I have sustained and I understand
that liability is denied by the City of Maplewood, Releasee, and it is covenanted
and agreed between the Releasor and Releasee herein that the within release and
settlement is not to be construed and admission of liability on the p art of the said
Releasee and that the within release and settlement agreement shall not be used b
said Releasor or anyone on its behalf as a defense or estoppel in any action which
is now pending or may be brought hereinafter by said Releasee against the said
Releasor or its agents and servants;
(3) That I understand fully that this compromise settlement is mutual, final and binding
upon all of the parties hereto regardless of whether too much or too little has been
paid;
(4) That this release is expressly intended to cover and include all claims, several or
otherwise, past, present or future, which can or may ever be asserted as heirs, or
otherwise, as the result of injuries, illness, disease or damage to property or person
as aforesaid or the effects or consequences thereof,
(S) That this full and final release is intended to cover any and all future injuries, illness
or disease, not now known to either party hereto but which may later develop or
be discovered, or damage to property or person, including the effects or
consequences thereof, including all causes of action therefor; and
(6) That the undersigned will indemnify and save harmless the City of Maplewood
released hereby from any and every claim or demand of every kind or character by
spouse or children or any other person which may ever be asserted by reason of
said injuries, illness or disease, or the effect or consequence thereof, or damage to
property or persons.
Dated: This day. of , 1997.
WITNESSES: SIGNATURE:
Address
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: English Street Improvements, Project 01 -14
a. Public Hearing, 7:00 p.m.
b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes)
DATE: January 22, 2002
Introduction
The Public Hearing for this project has been scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, January 28, 2002.
Notices of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The feasibility study has been
provided as a supplement to the council packet. The study includes information on the proposed
improvement, proposed financing and probable assessments. The city council should consider
ordering the improvement following the public hearing.
Background
Two neighborhood meeting were held, with the second scheduled for 1/23/02 with the affected
property owners. The meeting was scheduled prior to the public hearing to provide an informal
setting to discuss the findings of the feasibility study and to answer any additional questions the
neighborhood might have. Notable is the recommended option to construct a roundabout at the
intersection of Frost Avenue and English Street. Construction of a roundabout will address
future needs for a signal at that intersection, as well as provide an aesthetic addition to this focal
point of the neighborhood. Ramsey County Public Engineering Division supports the roundabout
option and it is proposed that the County participate in 50% of the roundabout construction.
Details on the roundabout option will be presented at the Public Hearing.
The overall project objectives as proposed to the neighborhood are:
• Reconstruct a badly deteriorated street in an environmentally sound manner.
• Provide a street design that reduces average speed.
• Treat property owners consistently in regards to assessments.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the
improvement of English Street, from Frost Avenue to Cope Avenue, City Project, 01 -14.
Budget Impact
The resolution calls for establishing a project budget of $1,794,200. The financing plan is
outlined specifically in the feasibility study and calls for funding from a number of sources;
Assessments, State Aid, Sewer Utility Fund and Ramsey County participation.
CIVIC
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a resolution of - the city council adopted the 14th day f January,
rY,
2002, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street and storm sewer
improvements on the English Street Improvement, between Frost Avenue and
Cope Avenue, City Project 01 -14.
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of
the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on January 28 2002 and
the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter a has full
considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the
feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make street and storm sewer
improvements on English Street from Frost Avenue to Cope Avenue on City
Project 01 -14.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council
resolution adopted the 28 day of January, 2002.
3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is
hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the makin g of said
improvement.
4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial
transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project
J p J
budget of $1,794,200. shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as
follows:
Assessments $371,670
State aid $1,288,130
Sewer Utility Fund $39,350
Ramsey County _ 195
Total $1 ,794,200
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer
R. Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
SUBJECT: County Road D Improvements, Project 01 -15
a. Public Hearing, 7:20 p.m.
b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes)
DATE: January 22, 2002
Introduction
The Public Hearing for this project has been scheduled for 7 :20 p.m., Monday, January 28, 2002.
Notices of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The feasibility study has been
provided as a supplement to the council packet. The study includes information on the proposed
improvement, proposed financing and probable assessments. The city council should consider
ordering the improvement following the public hearing. The project has two phases: first the
reconstruction of County Road D between White Bear Avenue and McKnight, while the second is an
overlay between White Bear Avenue and Hazelwood.
Background
Two neighborhood meeting were held with the second meeting held on 1/16/02 with the affected
property owners. Also present was a group representing the Bruentrup Farm. The meeting was
scheduled prior to the public hearing to provide an informal setting to discuss the findings of the
feasibility study and to answer any additional questions the neighborhood might have. The property
owners between Hazelwood St. and White Bear Avenue were not included in the neighborhood
meeting, as the two phases of the project vary greatly. An informational letter was sent to those
property owners to give them information about the project before the public hearing. As noted at the
past council meeting, there is still some disagreement by all parties involved to the exact alignment of
the proposed trail. The recommendation in the report was based on staff's best interpretation of a
compromising alignment to meet the needs and interests of the interested parties, as well as the
general public.
The project proposed to the neighborhood includes the goals of:
Reconstruct a badly deteriorated roadway while maintaining a rural character.
Provide a roadway design that encourages a reduction in average speed.
Treat property owners fairly with assessments consistent with all other properties within the
City, including deferment agreements to allow future connections.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the
improvement of County Road D, Hazelwood Street to McKnight Road, City Project, 01 -15.
COUNTY ROAD D IMPROVEMENTS
COUNCIL AGENDA BACKGROUND
JANUARY 28, 2002
PAGE TWO
Budget Impact
The proposed resolution calls for establishing a project budget of $1,880,840. The financing plan is
outlined specifically in the feasibility study and calls for funding from a number of sources:
Assessments, State Aid, Sewer Utility Fund and General Tax Levy. A number of properties may
require special agreements to allow for the establishment of connection charges in the future. These
properties are large parcels that may be subdivided in the future. Special financing consideration will
be needed for these parcels and the project fund. Utility expenditures for installation of water main
will also require local participation due to unassessable frontage on open space property. The
financing package will be further reviewed at the Public Hearing.
CMC
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 14th day f January,
rI/,
2002, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street and utilit
Y
improvements on County Road D, between Hazelwood Street and McKnight Road,
City Project 01 =15.
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of
the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on January 28 2002 and
the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fuily Y
considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPL.EWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost-effective and feasible, as detailed in the
feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make street and utility
improvements on County Road D, between Hazelwood Street and McKnight Road,
g
City Project 01 -15.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council
resolution adopted the 28th day of January, 2002.
3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is
hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said
improvement.
4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial
transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project
budget of $1,880,840. shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as
follows:
Assessments $ 728,280
State aid 1
Sewer Utility Fund 49,750
General Tax Levy 94,000
Total $1,880,840
To; Maplewood City Council
From; Concerned Residents of Co. Rd. D
Recently there has been a proposal to reconstruct Co. Rd. D, from white Bear Ave.
to Mcknight Rd. At the previous meetings on this proposed project, the proposal was to
replace the existing road with a rural type road to maintain the country setting of this
section of Co. Rd. D. We were told this would minimize the removal of the trees and
dividers would be installed at Arial and Mckight to calm the traffic in an intent to help
reduce the excess speeds that are currently an issue. This seemed to be the best proposal.
Than at the last meeting, a change was made to put an 8' walking trail either along
Co. Rd. D on the south side or near the rear of are property lines. If the trail was put on
the south side of Co. Rd. D , it would defeat the purpose of putting the rural road in and
keep the country image, as this would require the removal of many trees.(already
numerous trees were cut down in the open air space) The other proposed 8' trail proposal
would run along the rear of are property lines. During the meeting it was suggested the
trail could be located along the power lines ( as it was originally proposed) Than one of
the cities representatives stated the open air space representatives did not want the trail to
be out there due to all the skateboarders and bikers disrupting things. In other words its
ok if are backyards are disrupted. This open air space belongs to all the people of
Maplewood and should be able to be -viewed from the middle ( an ideal location) were it
will least effect the existing residences who have the greatest impact of these decisions.
Besides all the other issues these proposals will have a large financial impact on all of the
residents of Co. Rd. D. The following residents are strongly opposed to the two trail
proposals and would be in favor of the trails original proposal along the power lines.
AN
U
f
i
C" -ed ""4 'V r� t
I JO
- - - C77
C - y �cl
ca A
-
�i
1
r
p
ff I
PROJECT 01 -15
JANUARY,
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 65415
612.370.0700 Tel
612.3701378 Fax
City of Ma ewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
7 ENGINEERING DIVISION
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
(651) 770 -4550 FAX (651) 770 -4506
FEASIBILITY STUDY
AND REPORT FOR
COUNTY ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS
FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT
FOR
COUNTY ROAD D IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NUMBER Ol - 15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 2002
URS CORPORATION
I hereby certify that this plan,
700 Third Street South
specification or report was prepared by
Minneapolis, MN 55415
me or under my direct supervision and
(612) 370 -0700
that am a duly Licensed Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of
File: 49392 -004- .11.01 _
Minnesota.
Signature
49392 -004 -2101
Date: O1"Z Z Lic. No. 41483
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I . INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ ...............................
l
II. PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS .......................................... ............................... 3
A. County Road D Improvements — Hazelwood Street to White Bear Avenue............. 3
Be County Road D Improvements -- White Bear Avenue to McKnight Road ............... 3
1. Roadway Improvements ................................................... ............................... 3
2. Sanitary Sewer Improvements ........................................... ..............................4
3 Water Main Improvements ............................................... ............................... 5
4. Storm Drainage Improvements ......................................... ............................... 6
5. Storm Water Infiltration Pond Improvements .................. ............................... 6
6. Bike/Walkway Irnprovements .......................................... ............................... 7
7. Street Lighting Improvements .......................................... ............................... 8
8. Landscaping Improvements .............................................. ............................... 8
9 . Restoration ......................................................................... ..............................8
10. Maintenance Impacts ......................................................... ..............................8
III. RIGHT -OF -WAY AND EASEMENT REQUIREMENTS ............... .............................10
IV. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS........ - o. 0 ....... 0 ......................... 0....0 ....... 0....
11
V . METHOD OF FINANCING ................................................................ .............................12
VI. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS .......................................................... .............................14
VII PROJECT SCHEDULE ....................................................................... .............................15
VIII. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................... .............................16
APPENDIX A - EXHIBITS
• Exhibit 1: Project Location Map
• Exhibit 2: Proposed Mill and Overlay
• Exhibit 3: Proposed Street Reconstruction
• Exhibit 4: Proposed Sanitary Sewer
• Exhibit 5: Proposed Water Main
• Exhibit 6: Proposed Storm Sewer
• Exhibit 7: Proposed Bike/Walkway
• Exhibit 8: Proposed Landscaping
• Exhibit 9: Typical 3 -Lane Urban Section
• Exhibit 10: Typical 2 -Lane Urban Section
APPENDIX B — DETAILED COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX C — PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
APPENDIX D — RIGHT -OF -WAY AND EASEMENT ACQUISITION ROLL
January 2002 i
I. INTRODUCTION
r � On September 10, 2001 the Maplewood City Council approved the preparation of a
icab v ty IcyvI L IItG VW1116 1111111VVG111GIILJ Lv vuHLy nVauL k Ly r1VJGl.I
Mill and overlay from Hazelwood Street to 700 feet west of White Bear Avenue
Reconstruction from White Bear Avenue to McKnight Road
The feasibility report was initiated in response to the existing poor pavement condition of
County Road D and the need to extend municipal sanitary sewer and water to businesses
and residences not currently served with these public utilities.
Recently, a traffic study of the Maplewood Mall area has been completed that reviews
short term and long term improvements necessary to improve existing and future traffic
congestion in the area. This feasibility report considers the recommendations from this
traffic study.
The proposed improvements herein will result in:
• Improved safety and traffic flow
• Extension of municipal water and sanitary sewer to properties currently served by
private well and septic systems
• Provide for safe pedestrian and bicycle traffic along County Road D between White
Bear Avenue and McKnight Road.
A project vicinity and location map is included as Exhibit 1 in Appendix A.
The proposed improvements to County Road D from Hazelwood Street east to 700-feet
west of White Bear Avenue include the following:
• Mill and overlay existing pavement
• Repair of deteriorated pavement
• Intermittent replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter
The proposed improvements to County Road D from White Bear Avenue east to
McKnight Road will include the following:
• Street reconstruction and improvements
• Public municipal sanitary sewer and water extensions and improvements
• Installation of non - motorized pathway
• Boulevard landscaping to enhance the existing rural streetscape, compliment the
Bruentrup Heritage Farm and City Open Space, and slow traffic speed
• New storm water infiltration basin and rainwater gardens to improve storm water
runoff
January 2002 j
During the preparation of this report, the following meetings have been held with
interested civic and citizen groups. In addition, ongoing meeting have been held with
Maplewood maintenance and engineering staff:
October 26, 2001 Maplewood Historical Society - Bruentrup Farm Committee
November 7, 2001 Maplewood Open Space Committee
November 20, 2001 County Road D Neighborhood Informational Meeting
This feasibility study details the proposed improvements, estimated project costs,
proposed assessments and financing and schedule for the project.
January 2002 2
II. PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
A. County Road D Improvements — Hazelwood Street to White Bear Avenue
The proposed roadway improvements will consist of the mill and overlay of the existing
roadway surface. Improvements to County Road D includes the milling of 2- inches of
existing bituminous surface from Hazelwood Street east to 700 -feet west of White Bear
Avenue, approximately 4,000 feet of roadway. Upon completion of the milling
operation, a new 2- inch bituminous roadway section will be placed. Storm drainage
castings, sanitary sewer castings, and water main valves and boxes will be adjusted
and/or rebuilt in conjunction with the mill and overlay project. In addition, any failing
concrete curb and gutter will be replaced. Exhibit 2 in Appendix A depicts the proposed
improvements.
B. County Road D Improvements -- White Bear Avenue to McKnight Road
r 16 Roadway
County Road D, from White Bear Avenue east to McKnight Road, is an existing .
two -lane rural section roadway. At the intersection of White Bear Avenue,
County Road D is a three -lane urban section roadway with curb and gutter and a
dedicated westbound left turn lane. The segment from White Bear Avenue to
Ariel Street serves primarily commercial properties while the segment from Ariel
Street to McKnight serves primarily open space and residential properties.
The proposed roadway improvements will consist of the total reconstruction of
approximately 3,300 feet of roadway, the installation of concrete curb and gutter,
the installation of sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer, and the
installation of a bike /walkway from white Bear Avenue east to McKnight Road.
A traffic study prepared by URS, November 2001 recommends improvements to
the intersection of White Bear Avenue and County Road D. The traffic study
recommends the following westbound lane geometry: one dedicated through lane,
the lengthening of the existing dedicated left turn lane to 150 -feet in total storage
length, and the construction of one dedicated right turn lane 150 -feet in total
storage length.
Considering the relatively low traffic volumes and residential land uses along the
roadway, a primary consideration of the roadway design is to provide for safe and
efficient vehicle needs without encouraging excessive speed. As such, an attempt
has been made to minimize the total roadway width within Municipal State Aid
standards and to accommodate adjacent land uses. In addition, consideration has
been given to maintaining the existing rural character of the roadway between
Ariel Street and McKnight Road.
January 2002 3
Municipal State Aid (MSA) standards allow for both urban and rural roadway
designs. The main difference is that urban roadways utilize curb and gutter to
collect storm water while rural roadways do not have curb and gutter and collect
storm water in adjacent ditches. MSA standards require a minimum 20 -foot clear
_
zone from the edge of a rural roadway. MSA standards require a minimum 1.5-
foot clear zone from the curb line for urban roadways. In an effort to keep the
streetscape as narrow as possible and thus encourage slower speeds, an urban
section is proposed. An urban section will allow the retention of much of the
exiting vegetation as well as the installation of additional boulevard plantings.
Exhibit 3 in Appendix A depicts the recommended alternative. The
recommended alternative is a 3 -lane urban roadway section from White Bear
Avenue east to Ariel Street. The 14 -foot center lane will be a dedicated turn lane
for left turning movements. The eastbound and westbound lanes will be 12 -feet
wide with 4 -feet shoulders on both sides of the roadway. No on- street parking
will be allowed on this section.
The recommended alternative from Ariel Street east to McKnight Road is a 2-
lane, 28 -foot urban roadway. No on- street parking will be allowed in this section
of roadway. A landscaping island is proposed at the Ariel Street intersection as a
"gateway" to the more rural section of the roadway and to allow for the alignment
shift from the two -lane section east of Ariel Street to the three -lane roadway
section west of Ariel Street.
Exhibits 9 and 10 in Appendix A depict the typical cross sections for County
Road D. Soil tests indicate that the R -value of the existing soils beneath the
roadway is between 30 and 50. The final roadway cross section will be designed
to provide for a 10 -ton roadway. For purposes of this report, the pavement design
consists of 2- inches of bituminous wear course, 2- inches of bituminous base
course, and 8- inches of Class 6 aggregate base. A more detailed pavement design
will be completed as part of the final plan preparation. B618 concrete curb and
gutter will line both sides of the roadway cross section. A bike /walkway will be
installed along the south side of County Road D from White Bear Avenue to
McKnight Road, and is discussed in further detail below.
29 Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Sanitary sewer is recommended to be extended to serve existing residences and
undeveloped properties along County Road D from Ariel Street east to 350 -feet
west of McKnight Road. Approximately 1,900 feet of 8 -inch PVC sanitary sewer
and sanitary manholes will be constructed. The proposed sanitary sewer will
connect to an existing sanitary sewer manhole located at the intersection of Ariel
Street and County Road D, and will extend to the east to serve existing residences
and future developments. Sanitary sewer service leads will be provided to
existing residences, vacant lots and to future potential lots for connection to the
public wastewater collection system.
January 2002 4
J '
Exhibit 4 in Appendix A depicts the proposed location of the sanitary sewer
� collection system. All other properties in the project area have available public
sanitary sewer service.
3. Water Main Improvements
Water main is recommended to be extended to serve existing residences and
undeveloped properties along County Road D. The existing water main at the
intersection of Ariel Street and County Road D is currently part of the City of
Saint Paul water distribution system. The existing water main at the intersection
of McKnight Road and County Road D is currently part of the City of North Saint
Paul water distribution system. These two separate water distribution systems can
not interconnect.
Water main is recommended to be extended from the City of Saint Paul water
distribution system to serve existing residences and undeveloped properties along
County Road D from Ariel Street east 65Q -feet. The proposed water main will
connect to an existing 8 -inch water main located at the intersection of Ariel Street
and County Road D.
Water main is also recommended to be extended from the City of North Saint
Paul water distribution system to serve existing residences and undeveloped
properties along County Road D from McKnight Road west 1,200 -feet. The
proposed water main will connect to an existing 8 -inch water main located at the
intersection of McKnight Road and County Road D.
A total of approximately 1,850 feet of 8 -inch DIP water main with fire hydrants
will be constructed. Currently there are not any fire hydrants along County Road
D from Ariel Street to McKnight Road. Water main service leads will be
provided to existing residences, vacant lots and potential future lots for
connection to the public water supply system. The new water main will be
constructed to meet the standards of the Saint Paul Regional Water Utility and the
City of North Saint Paul as appropriate.
One disadvantage to the proposed water main improvements is both extensions,
from the City of Saint Paul system and the City of North Saint Paul system, result
in dead end water main pipes. Dead end water main pipes can result in reduced
water quality in the dead end lines unless the water main pipes are routinely
flushed.
Exhibit 5 in Appendix A depicts the proposed location of the water distribution
supply system. All other properties in the project area have available public water
main service.
January 2002 5
1
1
40 1 Storm Drainage Improvements
The proposed storm water drainage system will consist of a storm trunk system
along the northern curb line of County Road D from White Bear Avenue east to
McKnight Road. This storm drainage system will provide drainage for the entire
roadway cross section for a 10 -year storm event. Storm water inlets will be
provided along both curb lines to assure adequate drainage for the roadway cross
section and conformance to the State Aid spread requirements.
The proposed storm water drainage system from White Bear Avenue east to Ariel
Street will drain west to an existing storm water drainage system at the
intersection of County Road D and White Bear Avenue. The proposed storm
water drainage system from Ariel Street east to McKnight Road will drain to a
proposed storm water infiltration pond in the City Open Space located along the
south side of County Road D, 600 -feet east of Ariel Street. The infiltration pond
shall be designed as a natural wet meadow and integrate with the Open Space
property.
In addition to a conventional storm water drainage system installed to drain the
roadway, the installation of rainwater gardens shall be encouraged. Rainwater
gardens are an alternative storm water management technique that collects off-
roadway drainage in low depressed areas within the boulevard area. Such
installations are landscaped with water tolerant plants and encourage storm water
infiltration. It is a City of Maplewood practice to offer to _construct rainwater
gardens as part of roadway reconstruction projects. Surveys will be sent to
adjoining properties to determine their interests in having a rain water garden
located along their property. If requested by adjacent properties, the City, as part
of the roadway project, will design, grade and prepare the rainwater garden and
provide plant materials to the property owner. The property owner is responsible
for the installation of all plant materials and all future maintenance.
Exhibit 6 in Appendix A depicts the proposed location of the storm water
collection system.
5. Storm Water Infiltration Pond Improvements
The proposed storm water drainage system from Ariel Street east to McKnight
Road will discharge to a proposed storm water infiltration basin located along the
south side of County Road D, 600 -feet east of Ariel Street. The proposed storm
water infiltration basin has been located within the dedicated open space area west
of the Bruentrup Heritage Farm. The proposed infiltration basin location has been
coordinated with various local committees and City officials and will be designed
as a wet meadow to enhance wildlife habitat and bio- diversity. An emergency
overflow will be coordinated with Mn/DOT officials to drain the new infiltration
basin to the existing storm water detention pond along the north side of County
Road D.
January 2002 6
Exhibit 6 in Appendix A depicts the proposed location of the storm water
collection system and storm water infiltration pond. Typically, catch basins will
be spaced a maximum of 300 feet and will be provided at major intersections and
roadway low points.
6. Bike/Walkway Improvements
County Road D is part of the alignment of the proposed Lake Links Regional
Trail. This proposed trail will provide a trail across the north metro area from
Roseville on the West to Silver Lake on the East. In addition to being on the
alignment of this regional trail system, the existing traffic volumes on County
Road D are high enough to warrant the construction of an off -road pathway. In
order to safely accommodate multiple users including bicycles, in -line skaters and
pedestrians, an 8 -foot wide off -road bituminous pathway is proposed. Based on
discussions with the Bruentrup Heritage Farm, Open Space Committee, residents,
and City officials two trail alternatives have been prepared. Both alternatives
propose to construct an 8 -foot bituminous trail along the south side of County
Road D from White Bear Avenue to Ariel Street.
Alternative l -- Adiacent to County Road D
Alternativel �'is to construct the proposed 8 -foot wide bike /walkway along
the south side of County Road D from White Bear Avenue east to McKnight
Road. The trail will generally follow the alignment of County Road D and
will be located approximately 8 -feet south of the south curb line.
This alternative avoids any encroachment into the Open Space. While the
segment from Ariel Street to McKnight Road could be constructed within
existing right -of -way, it may impact the front yards of residents along
County Road D. As such, this alternative is not supported by the
neighborhood.
Alternative 2 -- Through Open Space
Alternative number two is to construct the proposed 8 -foot wide
bike /walkway along the south side of County Road D from White Bear
Avenue east to 800 -feet east of Ariel Street. From this location the
proposed bike /walkway will meander throughout the open space and
Bruentrup Heritage Farm area connecting to McKnight Road approximately
350 -feet south of County Road D. The trail would connect to the proposed
parking lot currently proposed to be located east of the Bruentrup Heritage
Farm House. It would be located along the north side of the Open Space
east of the farm to McKnight Road.
This Alternative would improve public access to the Open Space property.
While it would provide a positive trail experience for trail users, it may
January 2002
7
disturb the continuity of the natural areas within the Open Space. As such,
the Open Space Committee has expressed some concern with this
alternative.
Exhibit 7 in Appendix A depicts the two proposed alternative locations for the
bike /walkway improvements.
7. Street Lighting Improvements
Street lighting currently exists at the intersections of County Road D and White
Bear Avenue, County Road D and Ariel Street, and County Road D and
McKnight Road only. It is not anticipated to add any additional street lighting
throughout the project corridor. Streetlights will remain or be replaced at the
above noted intersections.
8. Landscaping Improvements
This proposed improvement recognizes the two distinct segments of County
Road D between White Bear Avenue and McKnight Road. The segment between
White Bear Avenue and Ariel Street is primarily commercial in nature. The
proposed landscape improvements in this segment will consist of traditional
boulevard plantings, typically regular boulevard trees, which compliment the
adjacent commercial properties.
The second segment, from Ariel Street to McKnight Road, is marked by the large
public Open Space and large single family residential lots. This segment of
roadway has a distinctly rural feel due in large part to the relocation of the
Bruentrup Heritage Farm. The proposed landscape improvements in this segment
will consist of native plantings that invoke a rural feel. Elements may play on a
farm motif and will be designed to narrow the overall streetscape -- thus
encouraging slower traffic speeds.
Exhibit 8 in Appendix A depicts the proposed landscaping improvements.
9. Restoration
All disturbed boulevard and yard areas adjacent to the construction will be graded
to match existing grades and replaced with topsoil, seed, fertilizer, and mulch.
The proposed infiltration basin will be planted with special plantings to aid in the
treatment of storm water discharge. Impacted driveways will be replaced in kind.
All existing gravel driveways will be replaced with bituminous apron approaches.
10. Maintenance Impacts
County Road D is under the jurisdiction of the City of Maplewood and roadway
maintenance will continue to be performed by the City. The construction of the
January 2002 8
VI. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS
Special assessments for streets, sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer are proposed
to be levied to benefiting properties within the project area. A preliminary assessment
roll for the project is shown in Appendix C. The assessment roll details assessments to
individual properties for the improvements to County Road D Mill and Overlay from
Hazelwood Street to 700 -feet west of White Bear Avenue, and for the improvements to
_ County Road D Reconstruction from White Bear Avenue to McKnight Road.
Assessments to residential properties are calculated on a unit basis. That is, a typical
residential lot is charged for one unit. Lots that have the potential to be subdivided are
charged for multiple units.
Assessments to commercial, industrial and multi - family residential properties are
calculated on a front footage basis. The front footage is measured at the lot's building
setback line.
Standard City assessment rates are detailed below:
The assessments for sanitary sewer and water main will be assigned to parcels that are
not currently served by municipal. sanitary sewer or water. The street reconstruction and
storm sewer assessments will be assessed to all affected property owners along County
Road D between White Bear Avenue and McKnight Road. The street mill and overlay
assessments will be assessed to all affected property owners along County Road D
between Hazelwood Street and 700 -feet west of White Bear Avenue.
January 2002 14
Residential
Rate
Perfarcel
Commercial
Rate Per
Front Foota a
Residential
Commercial
Service
Connection
Service
Connection
Street — Mill and Overlay
$1,500.00
$30.00
-
-
Street -- Reconstruction
$4,000.00
$80.00
-
-
Sewer
$2,625.00
$35.00
$1,000.00
$
- Sanitary
Water Main
$2,625.00
$35.00
$
$1,333.00
F Ston - n Sewer
1 $ 630.00
$16.801
1 -
The assessments for sanitary sewer and water main will be assigned to parcels that are
not currently served by municipal. sanitary sewer or water. The street reconstruction and
storm sewer assessments will be assessed to all affected property owners along County
Road D between White Bear Avenue and McKnight Road. The street mill and overlay
assessments will be assessed to all affected property owners along County Road D
between Hazelwood Street and 700 -feet west of White Bear Avenue.
January 2002 14
i
January 2002 - 15
VII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
f �
If the City Council chooses to accept this report and schedule a public hearing, we
recommend that the following project schedule be adopted:
Accept Feasibility Study and Call Public Hearing
January 14, 2001
Public Improvement Hearing
January 28, 2002
If Council votes to proceed:
Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications
January 28, 2002
Authorize Advertisements for Bids
March 11, 2002
Receive Bids
April 16, 2002
Award Contract
April 22, 2002
Assessment Hearing
April 22, 2002
Start Construction
May 15, 2002
Construction Complete
October 2002
1
i
January 2002 - 15
VIII. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The County Road D Improvements Projects, Mill and Overlay from Hazelwood Street to
700 -feet west of White Bear Avenue, and the Reconstruction from White Bear Avenue to
McKnight Road, City Project 01 -15, has a funding plan that has been identified in the
previous sections. This section summarizes the funding sources and how they relate to
the overall project costs.
The following is a summary of the anticipated project costs and funding sources.
Estimated Project Costs
Amount
Roadway Improvements $ 1,149
Storm Drainage $ 344
Non- Motorized Pathway $ 105
Sanitary Sewer $ 120
I Water Main $= 61,300.00
Total $1,880,840.00
Proposed Funding Sources
Amount
MSAS $ 1
Sewer Utility $ 30
Assessments $ 728
Debt Service $_ 94 000.00
Total $1,880,840.00
Based upon the estimated cost, the existing and proposed land use in the area, existing
condition of the roadway and the project assessment rates and other funding sources, it is
concluded that the County Road D Improvements Projects, City Project 01 -15, is
necessary, cost - effective, technically and economically feasible.
Based upon this feasibility study, we recommend the following:
1. The City of Maplewood accepts this feasibility report and schedule a public
hearing on January 28, 2002,
2. That this report be adopted as the guide for the street and utility improvements
contained herein,
3. Based on the outcome of the public hearing, the Council could proceed to order
the proposed improvements and authorize the preparation of plans and
specifications.
January 2002 16
APPENDIX A
EXHIBITS
January 2002
COUNTY ROAD D COUNTY ROAD D
MILL & OVERLAY RECONSTRUCTION
E4
CALL MiE
�.
CT. ...yam y! ¢ 4 II -_
. II �r owv �y
2. Um MIEN
4r 1. ST. jaws J AM$
2 ' L
CX
CNt • .
">
3. OILIl1M CT. MAPLE LA. f
• 3 • a 4. UM AI&
Wm MN KAM
n MAPLE NEw MME.
Nam : ,
s /
` RMIYSEr NORM SAM
° "
cmff
r f�•_ .��` .: i a I�FLWW /NE IOOi�yM� fc
AWL
CoMY ROAD
El
«t- .
_. r*Am V AAA`
AWL ROOM$ EL
CG , mw
AAAE
C011MIS AML } acme
QIIMIOIYIEMI MIL � •�,
` vmm OR
f = �,, �i �► COPE KTM�.�.,t°° LAM � COPE ANE � �, • f
.� 3000
wu f tj AM 7 LARK AVL
LANK NL
t s , Lalr „ C0. RD. tAr<JR�E R0. LMIRIE gg
RO. L*6T AIMS.
5
craN AID. a +�S s CO. FA e
' f f fff aMwea�s sr (>I "„e ® °u�cE 'M`� ® mmm AM ."000'
LIL AM
goof C� SOWAL � � AM L eEL�IONr AYE � � � i. L r )
aftuwN INIE HARM MIE � JOE UL
IIOe:EM1000< MIE.
tl 7NI AME
;. o g 4. � Awe
NY AN AV. s NORTH � T CAUL
ow- MON i � aooa Moualr►Y wL
A�lORICII .
PE "" Am E r ® 9 QOU1l3E� t
+� ,� w AAA A W I ® �' ' '' ,.
® AML < �„ .. 4. Io"oLL CL
RP LEY /" ` \ :. Mn" AM � Rl PLJEY
�: w ,. _ `'` ♦,♦ w ® KMIGSION
JUML t(>r10SION
AYE:
s p y 1 PRICE AYE �:
s p + W
♦ °� LrM jet ;� $ PRICE M ! X11 MCNSir W
ML
IaAllo ANE
City of Maplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
COUNTY ROAD D
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1830 East County Road 6 IMPROVEMENTS
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
770 -4550 FAX 651 7 0 1*�15
(651) ( ) 70 -4506
,*~ so"
too m" ftem mm"O
EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
PROPOSED STREET
MILL AND OVERLAY
City of Maplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
.ENGINEERING DIVISION
1830 East County Rood 0
Maplewood, Minnesota 88109
(651) 770 -4550 FAX (651) 77 -4506
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
k4mespolls. MN 5605
612.370.0700 TN
612.370.1370 Fox
0 0
Emw
SCALE IN FEET
L ►1�_i�� :. r ��
M LL AND OVEFLAY
c PR 0 JECT 01-15
EXHIBIT 2
�g
la
so ._...___..12
SCALE IN FEET
f PROPOSED STREET
. RECONSTRUCTION
at ofMaplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1630 Ent County Road 0
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
(651) 770 - 4550 FAX (651) 770 -4506
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Mlnnsspoils. MN 55415
012.370.0700 Til
012.370.1378 Fox
jum
COLKN ROAD D
RE00INISTRUCTION
ET
CITY PROJECT 01AS
EXHIBIT 3
'404
MERAL4
INN
c) p EXIST MNDOT..
STORM WATER POND
AMOCO PERKINS
2
2075 091
2009 � 02 203
-J I 11981
CONNECT TO EXIST
SANITARY MANHOLE
%
------- Pvc AIL
Ar- mN -
0
W
7-
;L
W Ulf. �COUNTY+ROAD D 2090
1990
1990
Z
IklTv
2036 W
3100 Uj
f5
CAI
IS
< V1
WY)
W j
Im CANT zz CHILDRENS
W
WORLD..
..........
BLDG.
m �OPOSED STORM
z
z
P—j LLJ 0 >- W
WATER AREA
1
W C)
0z
Z UJ Zw : -:: = ••: - ::: •
W Ir WIM
M CL R-F=
v
1
m & 1AAAA499
PVC MH . , 4: P MH
ic PIC
W IT**
141
C`OUNTY ROAD D
2170 2212 2223.:-, 2234 2238 2246
311
f%4
0 . I
0
I I
v
Z
4c
- A
PROPOSED 8"
SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING
SANITARY SEWER
Cit of Maplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
y, ENGINEERING DIVISION
1830 East Count Road 8
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
(851) 770-4550 FAX (851) 770-4506
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Nnnespolls. MN 65415
612.370.0700 Tol
612.370.1378 Fox
M ROAD D
PR 4P�O�ED
S s� �w ER AWMY
cm 01A5
EXHIBIT 4
PROPOSED 8"
SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING
SANITARY SEWER
Cit of Maplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
y, ENGINEERING DIVISION
1830 East Count Road 8
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
(851) 770-4550 FAX (851) 770-4506
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Nnnespolls. MN 65415
612.370.0700 Tol
612.370.1378 Fox
M ROAD D
PR 4P�O�ED
S s� �w ER AWMY
cm 01A5
EXHIBIT 4
�
4
JEMERAL
INN
EXIST MNDOT
STORM WATER POND
AMOCO PERKINS
2075 ,2091
2009 h02 203
—J 11981
CONNECT TO EXIST WATER MAIN I I ( ......._.
H
0 alp r DP
I � . -1 , �p P * * 'i 1; W
r,4
COUNTY ROAD D 2090
1990 R ELOCATE HYDRANT
C 11 1
O2
z TYPICAL 1!
2036
3100
cn
W W
CANT z CHILDRENS
m I W
WORLD.
BLDG. R , :•: `' •:,.'
ROPOSED STORM
>-W <
0
z WATER AREA
00
zwzw
W Ir Wm
vi
I
'e-1000,
so 120
SCALE IN FEET
PROPOSED 8"
WATER MAIN
EXISTING
WATER MAIN
Cit of Maplewood
OF PUBUC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1830 East Count Road 0
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
(651) 770-4550 FAX (651) 770-4506
Thrasher Square
700 Third Street South
LINnnespolle, ION 55415
412-370-0700 Tel
612.370.13715 Fax
C*t#M
TOAD D
Pi
WATM MM
CITY 01A5
EXHIBIT 5
I'
-
—
1
' I
2175 2191 ` + + 2205
aaaa- .
t v S 15 S
aaaaaaae. aaatra� aaaaaaaa► aa.....
COUNTY • _0• _D D
2170 2212 2228 2234 2238 2246
311
'fill
O
i �
.
u
Z
Y
U
_a
go 120
SCALE IN FEET
PROPOSED
STORM SEWER
EXISTING
STORM SEWER
City of Maplewood
.DE.P111111 1 ''MENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
y ENCINEER.INC DIUS.ION
1630 East County Road B
Maplewood. Minnesota 55109
(651) 770 -4550 FAX (651) 770 -4506
Thresher Squad
700 Third Strost South
mmeepolls. MN 05416
412.370.0700 Tol
612.370.1370 Fox
COU ROAD D
PR�P�08ED
STORM SEWER
CITY PROTECT 01AS
EXHIBIT 6
go 120
SCALE IN FEET
PROPOSED
STORM SEWER
EXISTING
STORM SEWER
City of Maplewood
.DE.P111111 1 ''MENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
y ENCINEER.INC DIUS.ION
1630 East County Road B
Maplewood. Minnesota 55109
(651) 770 -4550 FAX (651) 770 -4506
Thresher Squad
700 Third Strost South
mmeepolls. MN 05416
412.370.0700 Tol
612.370.1370 Fox
COU ROAD D
PR�P�08ED
STORM SEWER
CITY PROTECT 01AS
EXHIBIT 6
AMOCO
ERA Li EXIST MNDOT
INN
STORM WATER POND
PERKINS
I h02 203 2075 2091
2009
I 5 11 I I PROPOSED 8' WIDE
i I I BITUMINOUS
BIKE /WALKWAY
•. (I I (
ALTERNATIVE NO. 1
q o
-
�
r --
S
( PROPOSED 8' WIDE Li
BITUMINOUS
I
BIKE/WALKWAY
(ALTERNATIVE N0. 1
2161 1 1 2175 219 � ( i i 2205
LA a— 01 —?k .....
2238 2246
I I mm�vlm
0
,II�u'i �� „j'� �'��' I•' PROPOSED
BITUMINOUS PATH
City of Maplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1830 East County Road 8
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
(851) 770 -4550 FAX (651) 770 -4508
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
W i mrspolis, MN 554M
$12.370.0700 TN
612.3703370 Fox
CoLem ROAD D
PFiOP+0�3ED
BKE/WALKWAY
CITY PROJECT 01AS
EXHIBIT 7
H
City ofMa�caleiwood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
, - ISM East county Rood s
mapiewood, Minnesota 55109
(651) 770 -4550 FAX ( 65 1) 77 -4508
Thrxshw Square
700 Thkd Str"t South
14me mft. MN 54415
012.370.0700 Tel
412.370.1378 Fox
Pi�1P�O�ED
C*MM ROAD D
LANDSCAPING PLAN
CITY PROJECT OM5
EXHIBIT 8
4'
2.09 + 2.0 �..•�-
2" MnDOT 2340 TYPE 41 A
WEARING COURSE
MnDOT 2357 BITUMINOUS
TACK COAT
2" MnDOT 2340 TYPE 32B
BASE COURSE
8" MnDOT 2211 CLASS 6
AGGREGATE BASE
TYPICAL URBAN
SECTION 1 +00 TO 10 +00
8.0' JT.
67' PATH 2' CLR.
SHLD.
� - -,.,
-� City of Maplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood Minnesota 55109
(651) 770 -4550 FAX (651) 770 -4506
YwftV1► W Wr
EMS 4YiM9/M 1r
sYIOYn hs
COUNTY ROAD D
RECONSTRUCTION
CP 011111111111111111111111111111115
EXHIBIT 9
ROW C/L ROW
33.00' 33.00'
1.50' 12.50' 12.50'
8.0' BIT.
6.67' 6.6T PATH 2' CLR.
SHLD.
B618 CONC.
C & 67 (TYP.)
2.0%
EXISTING GROUND 2" MnDOT 2340 TYPE 41 A
WEARING COURSE
MnDOT 2357 BITUMINOUS
TACK COAT
2" MnDOT 2340 TYPE 32B
BASE ' COURSE
8" MnDOT 2211 CLASS 6
AGGREGATE BASE
TYPICAL 21ANE URBAN
SECTION 10 +00 TO 32 +50
City Of Maplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
.Z, ENGINEERING DIVISION
1830 East County Rood B
Moplewood, Minnesota 55109
(651) 770 -4550 FAX (651) 770 -4506
r.."wR w wti
tms MarswnS rr
Nsrsan a
COUNTY ROAD D
RECONSTRUCTION
CP 01 -15
EXHIBIT 10
APPENDIX B
DETAILED COST ESTIMATES
January 2002
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY ROAD D IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 01-15
ESTIMATED COSTS -.SUMMARY
IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT COST
County Road D (Reconstruction)
Roadway (White Bear Avenue to Arial Street)
$
.304,760.00
Roadway (Arial Street to- McKnight Road)
$
482,200.00
Sanitary Sewer
$
120,600.00
Water Mann
$
161, 700.00
Storm Drainage
$
225
Storm Water Pond
$
118
Trailway Option 1
$
94,980.00
Trailway Option 2
$
105 9 280.00
County Road D (Mill and Ov erlay)
Roadway (Hazlewood Street to White Bear Avenue)
$
362,200.00
. .... .. . . ... .
....... . ., .... .: .... ...:.. .... ... . .. . :. :: . ::.... ... - -:.. ..... . ..... . ......... ....
. . ..... TO
Trailway Option l
$
1,870,540.00
Trailway Option 2
1,880,840.00
1
Feas Estimate.xis
1/21/2002 2 Feas EstimateAs
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY ROAD D - WHITE BEAR AVENUE TO ARIAL STREET
CITY PROJECT NO. 01-15
ESTIMATED COSTS - STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Item No.
Item
Unit
Ouantity
Unit Price
Amount
1
Sawcut Pavement
LF
340
$
4.00
$
1
2
Remove Bituminous Pavement
SY
4
$
3.00
$
14
3
Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter
LF
1
$
6.00
$
7
4
Remove Storm Culvert
LF
100
$
2000
$
200.00
5
Remove Street Sign
EA
9
$
100.00
$
900.00
6
Remove Retaining Wall
LS
1
$
1
$
1
7
Common Excavation
CY
682
$
8.00
$
5,45 8.32
8
Subgrade Excavation
CY
2
$
8.00
$
18
9
Geotextile Fabric Type V - MnDOT 3733
SY
1,758
$
1.50
$
2,636.55
10
12" Select Granular Borrow - MnDOT 2105
TON
290
$
10.00
$
2
11
8" Aggregate Base Class 6 - MnDOT 2211
TON
2,464
$
11.00
$
27,104.00
12
2" Bit Wear Course - MnDOT 2340 41A
TON
646
$
36.00
$
23,247.00
13
2" Bit Base Course - MnDOT 2340 32B
TON
646
$
34.00
$
21,955.50
14
Tack Coat
GAL
293
$
2.00
$
585.90
15
B618 Concrete Curb & Gutter
LF
1,995
$
8.00
$
15,960.00
16
Striping
LF
4
$
2.00
$
9
17
Furnish and Install Type C Sign
EA
9
$
60.00
$
540.00
18
Street Sign
EA
2
$
240.00
$
480.00
19
Street Lights
EA
$
4
$
-
20
Construct Modular Block Retaining Wall
SF
500
$
18.00
$
9,000.00
21
Seed w /4" Topsoil & Fertilizer
SY
$
2.00
$
-
22
Sod w /4" Topsoil & Fertilizer
SY
693
$
4.00
$
2,772.00
23
Traffic Control
LS
1
$
5,000.00
$
5
24 -
Salvage and Reinstall Mailbox
EA
$
300.00-
$
-
25
Salvage and Reinstall Chain Link Fence
LF
$
6.00
$
-
26
Adjust Sanitary Manhole
EA
6
$
250.00
$
1
27
Adjust Gate Valve & Box
EA
8
$
200.00
$
1,600.00
28
Hay Bale Checks
EA
30
$
8.00
$
240.00
29
Silt Fence
LF
2,000
$
2.50
$
5
30
Temporary Rock Entrance
EA
2
$
1
$
2 9 000.00
31
Clearing
AC
0.15
$
7
$
1
32
Grubbing
AC
0.1.5
$
7
$
1
33
Landscaping
LS
1
$
20
$
20,000.00
Subtotal
$
202
Contingency
10%
$
20,200.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$
222
Indirect Costs
31.5%
$
70
Right -of -Way
SF
1,520
$
8.00
$
12
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$
304,760.00
1/21/2002 2 Feas EstimateAs
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY ROAD D - ARIAL STREET TO MCKNIGHT ROAD
CITY PROJECT NO. 01-15
ESTIMATED COSTS - STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Item No. Item
:1
Mobilization
2
Sawcut Pavement
3
Remove Bituminous Pavement
4
Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter
5
Remove Storm Culvert
6
Remove Street Sign
7
Common Excavation.
8
Subgrade Excavation
9-
Geotextile Fabric Type V - MnDOT 3733
10
12" Select Granular Borrow - MnDOT 2105
11
8" Aggregate Base Class 6 - MnDOT 2211
12
2" Bit Wear Course - MnDOT 2340 41A
13
2" Bit Base Course - MnDOT 2340 32B
14
Tack Coat
15
B618 Concrete Curb & Gutter
16
Striping
.17
Furnish and Install Type C Sign
18
Street Sign
19
Street Lights
20
Seed w /4" Topsoil & Fertilizer
21
Sod w /4" Topsoil & Fertilizer
22
Traffic Control
23
Salvage and Reinstall Mailbox
24
Salvage and Reinstall Chain Link Fence
25
Adjust Sanitary Manhole
26
Adjust Gate Valve & Box
.27
Hay Bale Checks
28
Silt Fence
29
Temporary Rock Entrance
30
Clearing
31
Grubbing
32
Landscaping
Unit O uant ty_ Unit Price Amount
LS
1
$
30,000.00
$
30
LF
150
$
4.00
$
600.00
SY
6,405
$
3.00
$
19
LF
158
$
6.00
$
945.00
LF
525
$
2.00
$
1,050.00
EA
6
$
100.00
$
600.00
CY
1
$
8.00
$
11
CY
2
$
8.00
$
23
SY
2
$
1.50
$
3
TON
367
$
10.00
$
3
TON
3
$
11.00
$
35
TON
893
$
36.00
$
32,130.00
"TON
840
$
34.00
$
28,560.00
GAL
371
$
2.00
$
741.30
LF
5
$
8.00
$
44
LF
7
$
2.00
$
15,800.00
EA
10
$
60.00
$
600.00
EA
2
$
240.00
$
480.00
EA
$
4,000.00
$
-
SY
9,660
$
2.00
$
19
SY
2
$
4.00
$
9,660.00
LS
1
$
5,000.00
$
5,000.00
EA
15
$
300.00
$
4,500.00
LF
330
$
6.00
$
1
EA
7
$
250.00
$
1
EA
15
$
200.00
$
3,000.00
EA
100
$
8.00
$
800.00
LF
4,700
$
2.50
$
11
EA
3
$
1,000.00
$
3
AC
1.00
$
7,500.00
$
7,500.00
AC
1.00
$
7,500.00
$
7
LS
1
$
5
$
5
Subtotal
Contingency
Total Estimated Construction Cost
Indirect Costs
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
1/21/2042 3
$ 333
10% $ 33,300.00
$ 366,700.00
31.5% $ 115,500.00
$ 482
Feas EstimateAs
-
iii 1 1 V1 l.Vii 11 A -L ' • ♦ %.- VL
COUNTY ROAD D - WHITE BEAR AVENUE TO MCKNIGHT ROAD
-
CITY PROJECT NO. 0 1 - 15
ESTIMATED COSTS
- SANITARY
SEWER
Item No.
Item Description
Unit
Ouantit
Unit Price
Amount
1
Remove Sanitary Sewer Manhole
EA
0
$
500.00
$
-
2
Remove Sanitary Sewer Pipe
LF
0
$
10.00
$
-
3
Connect to Existing Sanitary Manhole
EA
1
$
800:00
$
800.00
4
8" PVC, SDR 26
LF
1
$
30.00
$
57,000.00
5
Sanitary Manhole (8' depth)
EA
5
$
1,500.00
$
7
- 6
Sanitary Mme (extra depth)
LF
50
$
125.00
$
6,250.00
7
S" x 6" PVC Service Wye
EA
13
$
75.00
$
1 975.00
8
6" PVC, SDR 35 Service Pipe
LF
560
$
15.00
$
8
9
6" PVC Plug
EA
13
$
30.00
$
390.00
10
Trench Stabilization Material
TON
140
$
15.00
$
2,100.00
Subtotal
$
83
Contingency
10%
$
8,300.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$
91,700.00
Indirect Costs
31.5%
$
28.900.00
I � TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
4
$ 120
Feas EstimateAs
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY ROAD D - WHITE BEAR AVENUE TO MCKNIGHT ROAD
CITY PROJECT NO. 0 1 - 15
ESTIMATED COSTS - WATER MAIN
Item No.
Item Des
Unit
Ouantit
Unit Price
Amount
Connect to Ex.Water Main
EA
5
$
19200.00
$
69000.00
.2
Remove H
EA
2
$
500.00
$
19000.00
3
6" DIP Water Main
LF
335
$
18.00
$
6,030.00
4
8" DIP Water Main
LF
1,910
$
24.00
$
459840.00
5
6" Gate Valve and Box
EA
13
$
750.00
$
99750.00
6.
8" Gate Valve and Box
EA
4
$
900.00
$
39600.00
7
1" Corporation Stop
EA
l2
$
200.00
$
21,400.00
81.
1" Curb Stop and Box
EA
12
$
250.00
$
3.1000.00
9
1 " Copper Service Pipe
LF
515
$
14.00
$
79,210.00
10
6" DIP Fittin
EA
6
$
300.00
$
19800.00
1 l
8" DIP Fittin
EA
11
$
350.00
$
3,850.00
12
811 x 6" Service Tee
EA
4
$
300.00
$
19200.00
13
H Assembl
EA
9
$
2.
. )000.00
$
189000.00
14
Trench Stabilization Material
TON
140
$
15.00
$
29100.00
Subtotal
$
1119800.00
Contin
10%
$
11,200.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$
1239000.00
Indirect Costs
31.5%
$
389700.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$
161
1/21/2002 5 Feas EstimateAs
1/21/2002 6 Feas EstimateAs
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY ROAD D - WHITE BEAR AVENUE TO MCKNIGHT ROAD
CITY PROJECT NO. 0 1 - 15
ESTIMATED COSTS - STORM SEWER
Item No.
Item Description
Unit Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
1
Remove Storm Manhole
EA
3
$
400.00
$
1
2
Remove Storm Pipe
LF
100
$
15.00
$
1
3
Connect to Existing Storm Structure
EA
2
$
700.00
$
1
4
2'x 3' Catch Basin
EA
13
$
1
$
19
5
48" Catch Basin Manhole
EA
12
$
2 1 000.00
$
24
6
66" Catch Basin Manhole
EA
2
$
3
$
7
7
15" RCP Class V
LF
1,715
$
25.00
$
42
8
18" RCP Class V
LF
1
$
30.00
$
37
9
21" RCP Class IV
LF
350
$
35.00
$
12
10
24" RCP Class III
LF
90
$
30.00
$
2
11
24" RCP FES w/Trash Guard
EA
1
$
800.00
$
800.00
12
Rip Rap w/Filter Blanket
CY
10
$
90.00
$
900.00
13.
4" Drain Tile - MnDOT 3149.2)
LF
460
$
2.50
$
1
14
Trench Stabilization Material
TON
240
$
15.00
$
3
Subtotal
$
155
Contingency
10%
$
15,600.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$
171,500.00
Indirect Costs
31.5%
$
54
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$
225
1/21/2002 6 Feas EstimateAs
i
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY ROAD D - WHITE BEAR AVENUE TO MCKNIGHT ROAD
CITY PROJECT NO. 01-15
ESTIMATED COSTS - STORM WATER POND . .
Item No.
Item Description Unit Quantit Unit Price
Amount
1 -
Pond Excavation CY 9 $ 6.00
$ 59
2
Pond Outlet Control Structure EA 1 $ 7
$ 7
- 3
Land Acquisition SF
- 4
Pond Planting and Turf Establishment AC 1.81 $8
$ 15,385.00
Subtotal
$ 82
Contingency 10%
$ 8,200.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$ 90
Indirect Costs 31.5%
$ 28
�r
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
l
*Assumes the land needed for the storm water pond will be dedicated.
$ 118,600.00
Feas EstimateAs
l
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY ROAD D - WHITE BEAR AVENUE TO MCKNIGHT ROAD
CITY PROJECT NO. OI -l5
ESTIMATED COSTS - TRAR.WAY
Item No.
Item Description
Unit
1
2" Bit Wear Course - MnDOT 2340 41A
TON
2
6" Aggregate Base Class 6 - MnDOT 2211
TON
3
Subgrade Excavation
CY
4
Common Excavation
CY
36.00
Subtotal
13,532.40
874 $
Contingency
10
15,724.80
Total Estimated Construction Cost
18.00
$
Indirect Costs
31.5
8.00
Easements
SF
900 $
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$
1/21/2002
1,155.00 $
8.00
Option 1
Trail Option 2
F32 Trail
QLuantik Un it Price
Amount
uantit Unit Price
Amount
6 $
36.00
$
11,718.00
376 $
36.00
$
13,532.40
874 $
18.00
$
15,724.80
1,021 $
18.00
$
18,370.80
771 $
8.00
$
6,165.60
900 $
8.00
$
7,198.80
1,155.00 $
8.00
$
9,240.00
1,349.25 $
8.00
$
10,794.00
$
42,800.00
$
49,900.00
$
4,300.00
$
5,000.00
$
47
$
54,900.00
$
14,800.00
$
17,300.00
4,135.00 $
8.00
$
.
33,080.00
4,135.00 $
8.00
$
33,080.00
1
$
94,980.00
$
105,280.00
8
Feas EstimateAs
1/21/2002 9 Feas Esti mateAs
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY ROAD D - HAZLEWOOD STREET TO
WHITE
BEAR
AVENUE
CITY PROJECT NO. 0 1 - 15
r
ESTIMATED COSTS - MILL AND OVERLAY
Item No.
Item
Unit
Ou an, ._ tl y
Unit Price
Amount
1
Mobilization
LS
1,$
15
$
15
2
Mill. Bituminous Pavement (2 ")
SY
21,159
$
2.50
$
52,896038
3
Mill Bituminous Pavement (Leveling)
SY
5
$
6.75
$
35,705.05
.4
Remove Bituminous Pavement
SY
50
$
5.00
$
250.00
5
Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter
LF
250
$
6.00
$
1,500.00
6
2" Bit Wear Course - MnDOT 2340 41 A.
TON.
2
$
36.00
$
83
7
Tack Coat
GAL
1,058
$
2.00
$
2
8
B618 Concrete Curb & Gutter
LF
250;
$
10.00
$
2,500.00
9
Striping
LF
24,000
$
1.50
$
36
10
Adjust Sanitary Manhole
EA
18
$
250.00
$
4
11
Adjust Storm Manhole
EA
10
$
250.00
$
2
12
Adjust Catch Basin
EA
10
$
250.00
$
2
13
Adjust Gate Valve & Box
EA
18
$
200.00
$
3
14
Traffic Control
LS
1
$
7
$
7
Subtotal
$
250,400.00
Contingency
10%
$
25,000.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$
275
Indirect Costs
31.5%
$
86
y
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$
362
1/21/2002 9 Feas Esti mateAs
APPENDIX C
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
January 2002
Project-,01-15 CO Rd D Imp.
PROPOSED - ASSESSMENT ROLL
Public Hearing Date 01/28/02
Publish In Maplewood Review Jan 16, 23 2002
Mail Notices Jan 15, 2002
Asmnt.
LINE No.
PIN
LEGAL
LOC. OWNER
Class
F.F.
ST
Uni
Sub -T
STM
Uni
Sub -T
SAN MAIN
Uni
Sub -T
SAN SVC
Unl .
Su b -T
W.MAIN
Uni
Sub -T
W.SVC
Uni
Sub -T
TOTAL
JOSHUA H ELLIS SARAH E ELLIS
SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS THE W 100 FT OF E 133 FT OF N
3113 MCKNIGHT RD N
1
022922110003
183 FT OF NE 1/4 Legal SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 551091569
SF
100.00
$4,000
1
$4,000
$630.00
1
$630
0
0
0.00
0
$4,630
PAUL H MOORS
N 333 FT OF W 80 FT OF E 213 FT OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 2 TN
2246 COUNTY ROAD D E
l
2
022922110004
29 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 5317
SF
80.00
$4,000
1
$4,000
$630.00
1
$630
0
0
1
0.00
0
$4,630
ALLEN D MOORE CAROL MOORS
SUBJ TO CO RD D AND GAS PIPE L ESMT THE W 80 FT OF
2238 COUNTY ROAD D E
3
022922110005
E 293 FT OF N 183 FT OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E ST PAUL MN 55109-5317
SF
60.00
$4,000
1
$4,000
$630.00
1
$630
0
0
0.00
0
$4,630
WILLIAM E STAFKI
W 120 FT OF E 413 FT OF N 183 FT OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO IN
2234 COUNTY ROAD D E
4
022922110006
SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 -5317
SF
120.00
$4,000
1
- $4,000
$630.00
1
$630
$2,625
1
$2,625
$1
1
$1,000
$2,625
1.00
$205
$1,000
1
$1,000
$11,880
JOHN H CADWELL DIANE L CADWELL
W 120 FT OF E 533 FT OF N 183 FT OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO IN
2226 COUNTY ROAD D E
5
022922110007
SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E ST PAUL MN 55109
SF
120.00
$4,000
1
$4,000
$630.00
1
$630
$2,625
1
$2,625
$1,000
1
$1,000
$2,625
1.00
$2,625
$1,000.
1
$1,000
$11,880
GARY R CHARPENTIER
DEBORAH L CHARPENTIER
SUBJ TO RD AND ESMTS THE W 100 FT OF E 633 FT OF N
2212 COUNTY ROAD D E
6
022922110008
183 FT OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 5317
SF
100.00
$4,000
1
$4,000
$630.00
1
$630
$2,625
1
$2,625
$1,000
1
$1,000
$2,625
1.00
$2,625
$1,000
1
$1,000
$11,880
EX E 633 FT OF N 183 FT & EX S 150 FT OF N 333 FT OF E
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
13 FT & EX S 905 FT THE NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS
1830 COUNTY ROAD B E
7
022922110009
& ESMTS) IN SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 2702
CITY
N/A
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
N 662 87/100 FT OF E 263 631100 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4
1830 COUNTY ROAD B E
8
022922120001
(SUBJ TO RDS AND ESMTS) SEC 27N 29 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 2702
CITY
N/A
PART N OF CL OF.:WOODLYN AVE OF THE E 197.958 FT OF
BIRCH GLEN APARTMENTS LLC
W 527.268 -FT (SUBJ TO RDS & PIPE LINE ESMT) IN THE NE
1725 TOWER DR W UNIT 160
.9
022922120007
1/4 OF SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E----- STILLWATER MN 55082 -7585
MF
167.958
$80
167.958
$13,437
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$13
BRUCE ROSS AND ASSOC
C/O SOCIAL DYNAMICS INC
E 239 FT OF W 329.31 FT OF N 253 FT OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO
573 PARK POINT DR
10
022922120008
RDS & ESMTS) IN SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E GOLDEN CO 80401 -7042
BC
209.00
$80
167.958
$13,437
$0.00
0
$0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$13,437
BRUCE R COTTON
MARGARET G COTTON
W 90.31 FT OF S 615:15 FT OF N 648.15 FT OF NW 1/4 OF
10100 COLFAX AVE S
11
022922120009
NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO ESMTS) IN SEC 2 TN 29 FIN 22
E BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 3136
BC
90.31
$80
90.31
$7,225
$16.80
90.31
$1,517
0
0
I
0.00
0
$0
$6,742
THAT PART LYING N OF WOODLYNN AVE OF THE W 263.63
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
FT OF THE E 527.26 FT OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4
1830 COUNTY ROADS E
12
022922120034
(SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS) 6 OF SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 2702
CITY
N/A
LESLIE C HAUSE LUCILLE M
-
HAUSE 2090 COUNTY ROAD D E
13
022922120040
REGISTERED LAND SURV NO. 463 TRACT A
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 -5314
MF
263.65
$80
263.65
'$21,092
0
$0
$35
263.65
$9,228
$1,333
2
$2,666
$1,333
2.00
$2,666
$1,333
3
$3,999
$39,651
PBJC TIRES INVESTORS LLC
EX E 367 FT THE N 253 FT OF PART OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4
500 AMS COURT
LYING E OF WIDENED WHITE BEAR AVE (SUBJ TO RD) IN
PO BOX 12057
14
022922210004
SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E GREEN BAY WI 54313 -9704
BC
162.00
$80
162.00
$12,960
$16.80
162
$2,722
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$ 15,682
BEG AT NW COR OF E 20 ACRES OF N 1/2 OF NW 1/4 TH W
ON N L OF SD 1/4 TO PT 848 71/100 FT W OF NE COR OF
SD 1/4 TH S 243 02/100 FT TH E TO W L OF SD E 20 ACRES
ASSOCIATES 6100 GREEN VALLEY DR
15
022922210011
TH N TO BEG (SUBJ TO RDS) IN SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
W MPLS MN 55438 -1220
BC
200.00
$0
200.00
$0
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$0
MAPLEWOOD MALL ASSOC, LP
75 REMITTANCE DR SUITE 1805
16
022922210012
SUBJ TO ESM TS; 2 LOT 1 BLK 1
W CHICAGO IL 60675
BC
271.07
$0
271.07
$
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$0
SUBJ TO & WITH ESMTS; PART LYING ELY OF FOL DESC L;
COM AT NE COR OF LOT 2 TH W ON NL OF SD LOT 43.33
MAPLEWOOD MALL ASSOC LP
_
FT TO BEG TH S PAR TO EL 548.37 FT TH SWLY ON CURVE
C/O CGR ADVISORS
TO RT 47.19 FT TH S 41 DEG 3 MIN 45 SEC W 71.24 FT TO
3001 WHITE BEAR AVE STE: 1072
17
022922210013
SL OF LOT 2 & TERM BEING IN 10 LOT 2 BLK 1
W ST PAUL MN 55109 -1207
BC
43.38
$0
43.38
$0
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$0
THE E 217 FT OF N 340.5 FT MOL OF NW 1/4& EXSDN340
.5FT & EX S 100 FT & EX BEG AT INT OF ORIG EL OF WHIT
BEAR AVE & SL OF N 340.5FT TH E PAR TO NL SD 1/4 313.9
FT TH S AT RA 153 FT TH W 114.5 FT TH S TO NL OF S 100
FT TH W AT RA TO SD EL OF WHITE BEAR AVE TH NLY ON
SD EL TO BEG. THE N 10 ACRES OF E 20 ACRES OF N1/2
M R DUNCAN FAMILY TRUST
18
022922210017
OF SD NW1 /4 E OF SD AVE (SUBJ TO RD & ESMTS) IN SEC
2 TN 29 TN 22
1700 COUNTY ROAD D E
E MAPLEWO M N 55109 5304
BC
217.00
$80
217.00
$17,360
$16.80
217
$3,646
0
$0
0
$0
0.00
$0
$21,006
RDL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
W 150 FT OF E 367 FT OF N 253 FT OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO
1990 COUNTY ROAD D E
19
022922210020
RD) IN SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 -5310
SC
150.00
$80
150.00
$12,000
$16.80
150
$2,520
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$14,520
1/22/02 1 Assessment Roll 1- 22.xls
Project - 01 -15 CO Rd D Imp.
PROPOSED - ASSESSMENT ROLL
Public Hearing Date 01/28/02
Publish in Maplewood Review Jan 16, 23 2002
Mail Notices Jan 15, 2002
LINE No.
PIN LEGAL Loc. OWNER
Class
F.F.
ST
Uni
Sub -T
STM
Uni
Sub -
SAN MAIN
Uni
Sub -T
SAN SVC
Uni
Su b•T
W.MAIN
Uni
Sub -T
W.SVC
Uni
Sub-T TOTAL
COM AT NE COR OF LOT 2 TH W ON NL OF SD LOT 43.33 TRUSTEE C/O CIRCUIT CITY STORES INC
FT TO BEG TH S PAR TO EL 548.37 FT TH SWLY ON CURVE 9950 MAYLAND DR
20
022922220001 TO RT 47.19 FT TH S 41 DEG 3 MIN 45 SEC W 71.24 FT TO W RICHMOND VA 232331463
MAPLEWOOD COMMONS LLC
BC
282.50
$30
282.5
$8,475
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$8,475
ATTN ROBERT M LARSEN
2252 LENWOOD COURT SW
21
022922220002 SUBJ TO & WITH ESMTS; EX E 325.83 FT, LOT 2 BLK 1 W ROCHESTER MN 55902 -1048
TOYS R US INC
BC
271.30
$30
271.3
$8,139
0
$0
0
$0
0`
0.00
0
$0
$8,139
461 FROM RD
22
022922220003 SUBJ TO ESMTS; LOT 3 BLK 1 W PARAMUS NJ 07652 -3526
DAYTON HUDSON CORP
BC
380.20
$30
380.2
$11,406
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$11,406
777 NICOLLET MALL
23
022922220007 SUBJ TO ESMTS; LOT 4 BLK 1 W MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 2004
EX S 190.85 FT; PART OF NW 1/4 LYING W OF LOT 3 BLK.1 DJD PARTNERS 111 LP
BC
25.67
$30
25.67
$770
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$770
MAPLEWOOD MALL ADD & N OF THE S 1022.73 FT OF THE C/ O WELSH COMPANIES INC
NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS) IN SEC 2TN 29 7807 CREEKRIDGE CIRCLE
24
022922220011 RN 22 W MPLS MN 55439 26.9
(BC)
481.93
$30
481.93
$14,458
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$14
ROBERT F HAJICEK PEGGY J HAJICEK
EX W 10 ACRES; N 1/2 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS) 1700 COUNTY ROAD D E
25
032922110002 IN SEC 3 TN 29 RN 22 W MAPLEWOOD MN 551)9 -5304
BC
2040.86
$
2040.86
$61,226
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$61,226
SUB TO RD OVER ALL OF LOT 36 AND PART OF LOTS 1 ROBERT F HAJICEK PEGG`7 J HAJICEK
AND 35 VAC ALLEY ADJ AND LOTS 29 THRU 36 AND 1 1700 COUNTY ROAD D E
26
032922120001 THRU LOT 8 BLK 2 W MAPLEWOOD MN 551(0 -5304
BC
543.14
$30
543.14
$16,294
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$16,294
EX W 400 FT; PART LYING S OF HWY 694 OF THE W 1155 GOFF HOMES INC
FT OF SW 1/4 OF SE1 /4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 34 TN 30 RN 865 ASPEN CIR
27
343022430003 22 W LITTLE CANADA MN 5.5109 -1071
CITY
N/A
EX W 400 FT; PART LYING S OF HWY 694 OF THE W 1155 GOFF HOMES INC
FT OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 34 TN 30 R 865 ASPEN CIR
28
343022430004 22 W LITTLE CANADA MN 55109 -1071
KEVIN TRAMM CONSTRUCTION INC
MF
755
$30
755.00
$22,650
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$22,650
PART S OF HWY OF E 165 FT OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ 1 3585 LEXINGTON AVE N
29
343022430005 SEC 34 TN 30 RN 22 W ARDEN HILLS M 551 26 -8064
MF
165.25
$30
165.25
$4,9
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$4,958
THIES TALLE
PART S OF HWY OF W 16 OF E 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC 34 TN 1 470 78TH ST W PO BOX 2 =50
30
343022440002 30 RN 22 W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8001
LARSON ENTERPRISES 3060
MF
661.00
$30
661.00
$19,830
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
0
$19,830
EX E 231 FT; E 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LYING S OF HWY 694 (SUBJ CENTERVILLE RD
31
343022440013 O RD) IN SEC 34 RN 30 RN 22 W LITTLE CANADA MN 55117 -1105
BC
430.00
$30
430.00
$12,900
0
$
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$12,900
CNL RESTAURANT INVESTORS PROP
SUBJ TO RDS; PT W OF THE E 397.6 FT OF S 149 FT & PT 450 SOUTH ORANGE AVE
32
353022330005 W OF THE E 392.6 FT OF PT N OF S 149 FT OF TRACT B W ORLANDO FL 32801 -3336
SUBJ TO RDS & EX PT W OF THE E 397.6 FT OF S 149 FT & SUBURBAN LLC
BC
120.00
$30
120
$3,600
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$3,600
EX PT W OF THE E 392.6 FT OF PT N OF S 149 FT THE W 9501 WYOMING AVE S
33
353022330006 197.6 FT OF TRACT 8 W BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 -2902
GROUND ROUND INC
BC
130.00
$30
130
$3,900
0.
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$3900
'
P O BOX 9078 BRAINTREE MA
34
353022330007 SUBJ TO RDS; EX W 197.6 FT & EX E 150 FT TRACT B W 02184 -9078
CHADCO CORP
BC
100.00
$30
100
$3,000
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$3,000
2044 COUNTY ROAD E
35
353022330008 SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS; E 150 FT OF TRACT B W WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 -4704
TOWN CENTER PARTNERS C/O MARCO
BC
100.00
$30
100
$3,000
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$3,000
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 80
MINNESOTA AVE LITTLE CANADA MN
36
353022330011 TOUSLEY COMMERCIAL PARK E 82 FT OF LOT 5 BLK 1 W 55117 -1781
TOUSLEY COMMERCIAL PARK SUBJ TO ESMTS & RDS; E
BC
82.00
$30
82
$2,460
0
$0
0
$0
0
'
0.00
0
$0
$2,460
231 FT OF SE 1/4 LYING S OF HWY 694 IN SEC 34 TN 30 RN
37
22 & IN SD TOUSLEY COMMERCIAL PARK EX E 82 FT; LOT TOWN CENTER PARTNERS 4400 78TH ST
353022330021 5 BLK 1 W W BLOOMINGTON MN 55435 -5406
BC
817.75
$30
817.75
$24,533
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$24,533
BEG AT INTERSECTION OF CL OF WHITE BEAR AVE & S L
OF SW 1/4 TH W 306.8 FT TH N 244 FT MOL TO S L OF HWY
TH ELY THEREON 298.17 FT MOL TO SD CL TH S THEREO FOUR CROWN INC
TO BEG IN SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS) OF 7445 4TH ST N
38
353022340007 SEC 35 TN 30 RN 22 W OAKDALE MN 55128.7052
BC
251.80
$30
0.00
$0
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$0
1/22/02
2
Assessment Roll 1- 22.xls
Project - 01 -15 CO Rd D Imp.
PROPOSED - ASSESSMENT ROLL I
Public Hearing Date 01/28102
Publish in.Maplewood Review Jan 16, 23 2002
Mail Notices Jan 15, 2002
3 .
Assessment Roll 1- 22.xls
Asmnt.
Class
F.F.
ST
Uni
Sub -T
TSTM
Uni
Sub -T
SAN MAIN
Uni
Sub -T
SAN SVC
Uni
1. Sub -T
I W.MAIN
Uni
Sub -T
W.SVC
Uni
Sub -T
TOTAL
UNE No.
PIN LEGAL
Loc. OWNER
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
W 250 FT OF PART LYING SLY OF HWY 694 & E OF WHITE
200 RANDOLPH DR E
,
39
353022340008 BEAR AVE (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 35 TN 30 RN 22
E CHICAGO IL 60601 -6436
BC
250.00
$80
250.00
$20,000
$16.80
250.00
$4,200
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$24,200
W 250 FT OF PART ELY OF WHITE BEAR AVE AND SLY OF
HWY AND N OF CO RD D PART ELY OF CL OF SD AVE AND
DELREY MAPLEWOOD ASSOCIATES
SLY OF NLY L OF HWY 694 (AS PROPOSED) OF SE 1/4 OF
4130 BURTON LN
40
353022340009 SW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS) IN 8 SEC 35 TN 30 RN 22
E MPLS MN 55406 -3638
BC
260.00
$80
260.00
$20,800
$16.80
260.00
$4
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$25,168
PETER HOUSER
BARBARA HOUSER
VIKING DEVELOPMENT A SUBJ TO ESMT; THE WLY 100 FT
11321 LANDING RD
41
353022340010 OF ELY 385 FT OF LOT 1 BLK 3
W EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 -4953
BC
100.00
$30
0.00
$0
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$Q
VIKING DEVELOPMENT A PART OF LOT 1 BLK 3 DESC AS
BEG AT A PT ON SL OF SD LOT 1 DIST 145 FT W FROM SE
�.
COR THEREOF TH W ON SD SL 140 FT TH N 236.91 FT MOL
ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA C/O MR
O NL OF SD LOT 1 TH SELY ON SD NL 141.07 FT TH S
THOMAS WOLFE 1290 MAPLE AVE E P O
42
353022340013 219.59 FT TO BEG
W BOX TROY MI 48083 -2817
BC
140.00
$30
0.00
$0
.0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$0
$0
VIKING DEVELOPMENT A PART OF LOT 1 BLK 3 LYING ELY
OF A LINE BEG ON SL OF SD LOT 1 DIST 145 FT W FROM
BFI REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 128
SE COR THEREOF TH N 219.59 FT MOL TO NL OF SD LOT 1
INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD SUITE
43
353022340014 AND THERE TERM
W PLYMOU M N 55441 -3928
BC
145.00
$30
0.00
$0
0
$0
0
$0
0
0.00
0
$Q
$0
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
W 33 FT OF PART S OF HWY OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN
1830 COUNTY ROAD B E
44
353022430002 SEC 35 TN 30 RN 2
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 2702
CITY
N/A
EX W 33 FT; THE W 198 FT OF PART LYING SLY OF HWY
WRONSKI PROPERTIES INC
694 OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS) IN SEC
7645 UPPER 45TH ST N
45
353022430003 35 TN 30 RN 22
E OAKDA MN 55128 -.2213
BC
165.00
$80
165.00
$13,200
$16.80
165.00
$2,
$15,972
MAPLEWOOD FINANCIAL CENTER
EX W 198 FT; THE W 354.01 FT; LYING SLY OF HWY 694 OF
BUILDING NO 1 LLP
SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS) IN SEC 35 TN
9070 90TH COURT EAST
46
353022430004 30 RN 22
E INVER GROVE HEIGHTS M14 55076 -3735
BC
156.01
$80
156.01
$12,481
$16.80
156.01
$2,621
$15,102
PATRICIA A PARKER
LAURA T HARPER
EX THE W 354.01 FT; THE W 657.5 FT SLY OF HWY 694 OF
12866 INGERSOLL AVE N
47
353022430005 r HE SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) OF SEC 35 TN 30 RN 22 -
E HUGO MN 55038 -8407
BC
303.49
$80
303.49
$24,279
$16.80
303.49
$5,099
$35
303.49
$10,622
$1,333
1
$1,333
$35
303.49
$10,622
$1,333
1
$1,333
$53,288
EDWARD DORLE
EX E 1/4 OF PART LYING E OF W 33 FT OF SW1 /4 & EX W
HELEN DORLE
657.5 FT; PART SLY OFHWY 694 OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4
3745 SOUTH HILLS DR
48
353022430006 (SUBJ TO RD) OF SEC 35 TN 30 RN 22
E ST PAUL MN 55123-
BC
311.03
$80
311.03
$24,882
$16.30
311.03
$5,070
$35
311.03
$10,886
$1,333
1
$1,333
$35
311.03
$10,886
$1,3
1
$1,333
$54,390
E 1/ 4 OF PART LYING E OF THE W 33 FT OF SW 1/4 OF SE
STATE OF MN DOT
1/4 WHICH LIES SLY OF HWY 694 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 35
395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD
49
353022430007 TN 30 RN 22
E ST PAUL MN 55155 -1801
N/A
232.29
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
DAVID A SCHMIDT
W 298 FT OF PART, LYING SLY OF HWY 694, OF SE 1/4 OF
2161 COUNTY ROAD D E
5o
353022440011 SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 35 TN 30 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 -5316
SF
333.175
$4,000 2.00.
,
$8 000
,
$630.00
2
$1 260
,
$2 625
,
2
$5 250
,
$1 000
,
2
$2 000
,
$2 625
,
2.
$5 2
$1 000
2
$2 000
$23 760
E 132.42 FT OF W 430.42 FT OF PART, LYING SLY OF HWY
HOWARD W NELSON
,
,
,
,
694, OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 35 TN 30
2175 COUNTY ROAD D E
51
353022440012 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN .55109 -5316
SF
132.42
$4,000 1.00
$4,000
$630.00
1
$630
$2,625
1
$2,625
$1,000
1
$1,000
$2,625
1.00
$2,625
$1
1
$1,000
$11,880
DAVID A HUEBL
SUSAN A HUEBL
EX W 430.42 FT. PART, LYING SLY OF HWY 694, OF SW 1/4
2191 COUNTY ROAD D E
52
353022440013 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS) IN SEC 35 TN 30 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 -5316
SF
193.67
$4,000 2.00
$8,000
$630.00
2
$1,260
$2,625
2
$5,250
$1,000
2
'$2,000
$2,625
2.00
$5,250
$1,000
2
$2,000
$23,760
LAWRENCE A W MEHSIKOMER HELEN B
PART, LYING SLY OF HWY 694, OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE
MEHSIKOMER 2205 COUNTY ROAD D E
53
353022440014 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS) IN 4 SEC 35 TN 30 RN 22
E MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 -53
SF
546.087
$4,000 5.00
$20,000
$630.00
5
$3,150
$2,625
5
$13,125
$1,000
5
$5,000
$2,625
5.00
$13,125
$1,000
5
$5,000
$59,400
TOTALS.
1
:1506 750
$45 874
$70111
$20
-
$63,549
$728,281
3 .
Assessment Roll 1- 22.xls
APPENDIX D
PRELIMINARY RIGHT-OF-WAY
AND
EASEMENT ACQUISITION ROLL
January 2002
CITY .OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY ROAD , 'D „ '
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
CITY PROJECT 01 -15
FINANCING PLAN DETAILS
RIGHT -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS WORKSHEET - FEASIBILITY STUDY
RIGHT -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS REQUIRED
.PARCEL
PARCEL
STREET
PIN
EASEMENT OR
RATE
TOTAL SFT
TOTAL COST
DESCRIPTION
OWNER
ADDRESS
NUMBER
RIGHT -OF -WAY
PER SFT
NEEDED
HARDEES
HARDEES FOOD SYSTEMS INC
3100 WHITE BEAR AVE
22922210004
EASEMENT
$8.00
109
$ 872.00
MIENKE AUTO CENTER
RDL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
1990 COUNTY RD. D
22922210020
EASEMENT
$8.00
404
$ 3,232.00
UNDEVELOPED PARCEL
ROBERT F. HAJICEK
COUNTY RD. D
22922210017
EASEMENT
$8.00
1
$ 9,712.00
UNDEVELOPED PARCEL
BRUCE R. COTTON
COUNTY RD. D
22922120009
EASEMENT
$8.00
512
$ 4
CHILDRENS WORLD
BRUCE ROSS AND ASSOC.
2036 COUNTY RD. D
22922120008
EASEMENT
$8.00
1056
$ 9
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
SPEACIALTY CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
COUNTY RD. D
22922120007
EASEMENT
$8.00
654
$ 5,232.00
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
CURRENT RESIDENT
2090 COUNTY RD. D
22922120040
EASEMENT
$8.00
86
$ 688.00
AMOCO
AMOCO OIL CO.
1981 COUNTY RD.D
353022340008
RIGHT -OF -WAY
$8.00
1,520
$ 12,160,00
5
$ 45, 240.00
RIGHT -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS TOTAL $459240.00
AGENDA nEM NO...
Memo
To: Richard Fursman, City Mana er
From Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
CC: City Clerk
Date: 01/22/2002
Re Award of Bid for New Fire Truck
AGENDA REPORT
a�
aAxion by C
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
INTRODUCTION
In the 2002 CIP plan, we budgeted for one new 1500 gpm pumper to be housed at station one. This
money comes from the Truck Replacement Fund.
BACKGROUND
We went out for bids in the first part of January. Bids were received and opened on January 14, 2002.
We only had one bid from Custom Fire in the amount of $244 Custom Fire has built our last three
fire trucks. We have had little or no problems with these trucks and are extremely satisfied, not only
with the quality of equipment, but also their level of service. This truck will be built exactly like the last
three with the exception we will be adding a foam system to this vehicle which will be the first one within
the City. This foam system will add $10,850 to the cost of this vehicle for a total cost of $255,830.
The delivery date of this vehicle is planned for the end of February. Normally, delivery of this type of
vehicle takes up to six month, but Custom Fire had a chassis on hand which will speed up the delivery
time.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended to the Council to award the bid to Custom Fire in the amount of , $255,830 for the
purchase of one 1500 gpm pumper and to direct the Finance Department to made the necessary
budget transfer.
1
AGENDA ITEM kJ 1,
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Richard Fursman, City Manager
R. Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
January 22, 2002
Maplewood Mall Area Traffic Study — City Project 01 -11
Consider Budget Adjustment
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Introduction
The city council has established, as one of their top priorities, a resolution of traffic concerns
around the Maplewood Mall area. On May 29, 2001, the city council authorized a study of the
traffic concerns in the mall area. That study was completed and presented to the City Council
and Planning Commission on December 17, 2001. The City Council authorized $30,000 of City
funds for the project and MnDOT and Ramsey County entered into cost sharing agreements for
their share of the study costs. The study was well received and additional work was authorized.
A budget adjustment to cover the study costs and additional work is needed.
Background
The original authorization anticipated a general study of the area. Specific requests increased
the scope of the work by the consultant. Additionally, funds above the project budget were
expended to prepare a detailed presentation and traffic model for use in documenting the area
problems. These additional expenses caused the project budget to exceed the maximum by
$9,000.
Additional study and work was authorized by the City Council on December 17, 2001. This
work includes presentations of the study to property owners, completion of a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment, and additional coordination with area agencies to implement the project
findings. The estimated cost of this additional work is $14,000. The total budget adjustment for
this project is $23,000 ($9,000 + $14,000).
Budget Impact
The additional $23,000 is available from the Public Works Administration Budget from 2001.
This money is budgeted for engineering studies during the year and was not entirely used
during 2001.
Recommendation
Approve a budget authorization for the Mall Area Traffic Study of $23,000 from the 2001
Public Works Administration budget.
RCA
jW
Agenda # J a-°'
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendments - ISTS Standards
DATE: January 16, 2001
INTRODUCTION
The Metropolitan Council is requiring the City to amend the comprehensive plan and the city code to
add standards about individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS). The city council gave the proposed
ordinance first reading on January 14, 2002.
DISCUSSION
City staff has been working with the staff of the Metropolitan Council to complete the required update
of the Comprehensive Plan. This plan update is to include policies in the plan about ISTS and is to
have the city add code standards about ISTS.
There are about 135 ISTS in Maplewood. Therefore, the proposed ordinance would only apply to a
small percentage of the households in the city. A major concern with ISTS is ensuring that they
receive regular maintenance and inspection. The Metropolitan Council and the state require the
owners of ISTS to have the systems pumped at least once every three years.
City staff, in order to simplify and speed up the ordinance writing process, has used Washington
County's Ordinance #103 about ISTS (Individual Sewage Treatment System) for the writing of our
ordinance. Washington County recently updated this ordinance making it very thorough and
comprehensive about ISTS. I have attached the proposed ordinance (with Maplewood references)
starting on page seven. This ordinance will meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Council and the
State of Minnesota. City staff will be working out how to implement the new ordinance standards,
including the inspection of new systems and the record keeping for the pumping or maintenance of
existing systems.
COMMISSION ACTION
On December 17, 2001, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed Water
Resources Management Plan and the proposed ISTS Ordinance amendment.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the ordinance starting on page finro. This ordinance amends the Maplewood City Code
standards for Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) in the city.
p:ordlists.ord.doc
Attachments:
1. Proposed ISTS Ordinance Amendment
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OFMAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE
CITY CODE ABOUT INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS (ISTS)
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances:
Section 1. This section deletes the following parts of the Maplewood City Code: (additions have
been underlined and deletions are crossed out).
! a ! a !• a.+ !!
! •• !! + s + l !• + • !a !++
W WA
. + • + ! "IMIAIF031AMMIN
..
a
+ a • + !• +! +•!
�• + a• +• +!! ••• ! +" 'a •! ! a r. a!
+M a ' M-MM" •
a I.E.3 I a r-A NMI im MANTE-7-11.12-C • + •! +• +!• k 4VM W + • !! a
too W -W r
+ + + a • • ! ! + a 1
. .
a 1 a ! + ! ! ! + + ! + ! ! a !! + •
•
+ 11 ,7 1 ! • a •
. • w W
+ •! • I + •• ! a r • . + ! + a • + a � + !
a • + ■ + ! a •
a • + a a ! + a • + ! + a + + a !
• +•!•+ �� • ! !a • W .rdh""161 !� !• a !+ •
snow
0 + a a + ! a • a + ! a a !1 a • a !• ! + ! ! a ! a ! a !! • ! + a
+ �•�• • +!• a! •+ � al +r ••+ +! !� !+ • !a �• �+
• �+ + !! +• 1 dMaAW"a t- 0 !a ! AI +! !+ + 2 N== WAIT !+
W
r
Section 2. This section adds the following to the Maplewood City Code: (additions have been
underlined and deletions are crossed out).
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE LOCATION, DESIGN, INSTALLATION, USE AND
MAINTENANCE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS (ISTS) WITHIN
MAPLEWOOD.
THE. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM ORDINANCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 9 -950 TITLE ................................................................ ..............................8 1
SECTION 9 -951 INTENT AND PURPOSE .................................. ...............................
SECTION 9 -952 DEFINITIONS
9- 952(a) Conflicting Provisions ............................................ ............................... 2
9- 952(b) Measurement of Distances .................................... ............................... 2
9- 952(c) Certain Terms ........................................................ ............................... 2
9 952(d) Definitions .............................................................. ............................... 2
SECTION 9 -953 GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................ ...............................
12
9 -953 - Applicability ................................................................ ...............................
12
9-953(a).... .............................12
9- 953(b) Administration by Federal Agencies ..................... ...............................
12
9- 953(c) Administration By State Agencies ......................... ...............................
12
9- 953(d) Administration of This Ordinance ......................... .....................8064......
12
9- 953(e) General Requirements ......................................... ...............................
13
SECTION 9 -954 ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS .............................. ...............................
46
9 -954 General ................................................................... ...............................
46
9 -955 Floodplain Systems .................................................. ...............................
46
9 -956 Greywater System. ................................................... .............................47
9 -957 Other Toilet Waste Treatment Devices .................... ...............................
48
9 -958 Collector Systems .................................................... ...............................
48
9 -959 Sewage Holding Tanks ............................................ ...............................
51
9 -960 Experimental Systems ............... ............................... .........................eves..
52
SECTION 9 -961 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ................ ...............................
53
9 -961 General Requirements ......................................... ...............................
53
9- 961(a) Maintenance of Septic Tanks ............................... ...............................
53
9- 961(b) Maintenance of System Components ................... ...............................
54
9- 961(c) Activities on the Soil Treatment Area ................... ...............................
54
9- 961(d) Disposal of Septage ............................................. ...............................
54
^0% A !111X1 \11[%Tn ATlr%kl
SECTION 9 -90L HVIYI1IVi3O l MA I lull .......................................... ...............................
C A
0'+
9- 962(a) Applicability ........................................................... ...............................
54
9- 962(b) Enforcement . .............. .......................................... .............0.....,....a......
54
9- 962(c) Board of Adjustment and Appeals ........................ ...............:...............
55
9- 962(d) Permits Required .................................................. ...............................
55
9- 962(e) Inspections Required ........................................ .... ............... ....a....a .... ..
56
SECTION 9 -963 LICENSING AND PERMITS ............................ ............................... 57
9- 963(a) Licensing ............................................................... ............................... 57
9- 963(b) Permits ................................................................. ............................... 57
9- 963(c) Permit Applications ............................................... ............................... 57
9- 963(d) Term of Permit ...................................................... ............................... 58
9- 963(e) Permit Revocation ................................................ ............................... 58
SECTION 9 -964 ENFORCEMENT ............................................. ............................... 58
9- 964(a) Violations and Penalties ....................................... ............................... 58
9- 964(b) Enforcement ......................................................... ........0...................... 58
9- 964(c) Public Health Act .................................................. ............................... 58
SECTION 9 -965 EFFECTUATION .............................................. ............................... 59
9- 965(x) Separabil ity ........................................................... ............................... 59
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE- TREATMENT SYSTEM ORDINANCE
SECTION 9 -950. TITLE
9 -950. Short Title. This Ordinance shall be known, cited and referred to as the Individual
Sewage Treatment System (ISTS) Ordinance, except as referred to herein, where it shall be
known as, "this Ordinance ".
SECTION 9 -951. INTENT AND PURPOSE
9 -951. Purpose. This Ordinance is adopted to provide minimum standards and criteria to
individual sewage treatment systems for the purpose of:
(1) Protecting the health, - safety, and welfare of the
residents of the city, present and future.
(2) Regulating the location, design, installation, use and
maintenance of individual sewage treatment systems
(ISIS) so as to prevent contamination of the surface
and ground waters within the community.
(3) Protecting the individual water supply wells in the city
from contamination by inadequate, improperly
designed, located, installed or maintained individual
sewage treatment systems.
(4) Providing for the orderly development of areas of the
city that are not served by central public systems.
Also to help preclude the need to install central public
sewer systems in areas not currently planned for
central public sewer systems.
(5) These standards are not intended to cover systems
treating industrial or animal waste or otherwastewater
that may contain hazardous materials.
SECTION 9 -952. DEFINITIONS.
9- 952(a) Conflicting Provisions. In the event of conflicting provisions in the text of this
Ordinance, and /or other ordinances, the more restrictive provisions shall apply. The City
shall determine which is more "restrictive" and appeals from such determination shall be
made in the manner provided herein.
9- 952(b) Measurement of Distances. Unless otherwise specified all distance shall be
measured horizontally.
9- 952(c) Certain Terms. For the purposes of these standards, certain terms or words used
herein shall be interpreted as follows: the words "shall" and "must" are mandatory, the
words "should" and "may " are permissive.
9- 952(d) Definitions.
(1) Absorption Area. "Absorption area" means the area below a
mound that is designed to absorb sewage tank effluent.
(2) Additive, Individual Sewage Treatment System. "Additive,
individual sewage treatment system" means a product that is
added to the wastewater or to the system to improve the
performance of an individual sewage treatment system.
These are not recommended and some are illegal and
harmful to the system.
(3) Aerobic Tank. "Aerobic tank" means any sewage tank that
uses the principle of oxidation in the decomposition of
sewage by the introduction of air into the sewage.
(4) Alternate Site. "Alternate Site" means that portion of real
property that is designated by a licensed ISTS Professional
and approved by the City to be protected from all vehicular
traffic, construction and other disturbances. The site must be
maintained in its original, natural soil condition so a future
individual sewage treatment system or device may be
constructed which meets all Ordinance requirements when
the original ISTS malfunctions, becomes non - repairable or
when it fails to comply with the Ordinance.
(5) Alternative System. "Alternative system" means an
individual sewage treatment system employing such methods
and devices as presented in Section 9 -954.
(6) As- builts. "As- builts " means drawings and documentation
specifying the final in -place location, size, and type of all
system components. These records identify the results of
materials testing and describe conditions during construction.
As- builts also contain a certified statement.
(7) At -grade System. "At -grade system" means a pressurized
soil treatment system where sewage tank effluent is dosed to
a drain field rock bed that is constructed on original soil at the
ground surface and covered by loamy soil materials.
2
(8) Baffle. "Baffle" means a device installed in a septic tank for
proper operation of the tank and to provide maximum
retention of solids, and includes vented sanitary tees and
submerged pipes in addition to those devices that are
normally called baffles.
(9) Bedrock. "Bedrock" means that layer of parent material that
is consolidated and unweathered.
(10) Bedroom. "Bedroom" means any room within a dwelling that
might reasonably be used as a sleeping room.
(11) Building Drain. "Building drain" means that part of the
lowest piping of the drainage system that receives the
sewage discharge inside the walls of the building and
conveys it to the building sewer beginning at least one foot
outside the building footings.
(12) Building Sewer. "Building sewer" means that part of the
drainage system that extends from the end of the building
drain and conveys its discharge to an individual sewage
treatment system.
(13) Capacity. "Capacity" means the liquid volume of a sewage
tank using inside dimensions below the outlet.
(14) Certified Statement "Certified statement means a
statement signed by a licensed installer or qualified employee
certifying that work was completed in accordance with
applicable requirements.
(15) Cesspool. "Cesspool" means an underground pit or
seepage pit into which raw household sewage or other
untreated liquid waste is discharged and from which the liquid
seeps into the surrounding soil. See Section 953(d) (4).
(16) Chambered System. "Chambered system" means a soil
treatment system where sewage tank effluent is discharged
to a buried structure creating an enclosed open space with
the original soil surface to act as a surface for the infiltration
of sewage tank effluent.
(17) Clean Sand. "Clean sand" means a soil texture composed
by weight of at least 25 percent very coarse, coarse, and
medium sand varying in size from 2.00 millimeters (sieve size
10) to -.25 millimeters (sieve size 60), less than 40 percent
3
fine or very fine sand ranging in size between 0.25 millimeters
and 0.05 millimeters (sieve size 270), and no more than ten
percent smaller than 0.05 millimeters and no larger than 2.00
millimeters. Clean sand also means a soil texture that meets
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
specification C -33 (fine aggregate for concrete) or Minnesota
Department of Transportation (MNDOT) specification 3126
(fine aggregate for Portland cement concrete).
The ASTM specification is found in. the current
addition of ASTM Standards, which is incorporated by
reference. This document is provided by the American
Society for Testing and Materials located at 1916 Race
Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103 -1187.
The MNDOT specification is found in the MNDOT Standard
Specifications for Construction, 1988 Edition, and the May 2,
1994, Supplemental Specifications, which are incorporated
by reference. These documents are provided by MNDOT
located at 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN
55155. All references can be found at the Minnesota State
Law Library, Judicial Center, 25 Constitution Ave., Saint Paul,
MN 55155, _and are not subject to frequent change.
(18) Department. "Department" means the City of Maplewood
Community Development Department.
(19) D__ NR. "DNR" means the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources.
(20) Distribution Box. "Distribution box" means a device
designed to concurrently and equally distribute sewage tank
effluent by gravity to a soil treatment system.
(21) Distribution Device. "Distribution device" means a device
used to receive and transfer effluent from a supply pipe to
distribution pipes or down slope supply pipes, or both. These
devices are commonly known as drop boxes, valve boxes,
distribution boxes, or manifolds.
(22) Distribution Medium. "Distribution medium" means the
material used to distribute the sewage tank effluent within a
soil treatment system. This medium includes drain field rock,
gravel -less drain field pipe in a geo textile wrap, or a
chambered system.
4
(23) Distribution Pipes "Distribution pipes" means perforated
pipes that are used to distribute sewage tank effluent in a soil
treatment system.
(24) Dosing Chamber, or Pump Pit, or Wet Well. "Dosing
chamber, or pump pit, or wet well" means a tank or separate
compartment following the sewage tank that serves as a
reservoir for the dosing device.
(25) Dosing Device. "Dosing device" means a pump, siphon, or
other device that discharges sewage tank effluent from the
dosing chamber to the soil treatment system.
(26) Drain field Rock. "Drain field rock" means crushed igneous
rock, or similar insoluble, durable, and decay- resistant
material with no more than five percent by weight passing a
3 /4 inch sieve and no more than one. percent by weight
passing a number 200 sieve. The size shall range from
three - fourths inch to 2 1 /2 inches.
(27) Drop Box. "Drop box" means a distribution device used for
the serial gravity application of sewage tank effluent to a soil
treatment system.
(28)_ Dwelling. "Dwelling" means any building or place used or
intended to be used by human occupants as a single family
or two family unit.
(29) Failing System. "Failing system" means any system that
discharges sewage to a seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, or
leaching pit and any system with less than three feet of soil or
sand between the bottom of the distribution medium and the
saturated soil level or bedrock.
(30) Gas Deflecting Baffle. "Gas deflecting baffle" means an
obstructing device on the septic tank outlet that limits the
escape of solids that are carried by septic tank gases.
(31) Gravel -less Drain Field Pipe. "Gravel -less drain field pipe"
means a distribution medium consisting of a corrugated
distribution pipe encased in a geo textile wrap installed in a
trench.
(32) Grey water. "Grey water" means liquid waste from a
dwelling or other establishment produced by bathing, laundry,
s
culinary operation, and from floor drains associated with
these sources, and specifically excluding toilet waste.
(33) Hazardous Materials. "Hazardous materials" means any
substance which, when discarded, meets the definition of
hazardous waste in MN Rules Chapter 7045.
(34) Holding Tank. "Holding tank" means a watertight tank for
storage of sewage until it can be transported to a point of
approved treatment and disposal.
(35) Imminent Threat to Public Health or Safety. "Imminent
threat to public health or safety" means situations with the
potential to immediately and adversely impact or threaten
public health or safety. At a minimum, ground surface or
surface water discharges, and any system causing sewage
backup into a dwelling or other establishment, shall constitute
an imminent threat.
(36) Impermeable. "Impermeable" with regard to bedrock, means
a bedrock having no cracks or crevices and having a vertical
permeability slower than one inch in 24 hours. With regard to
soils, a soil horizon or layer having a vertical permeability
slower than 0.025 inch in 24 hours shall be considered
impermeable.
(37) Individual Sewage Treatment System (I "Individual
sewage treatment system" means a sewage treatment
system, or part thereof, serving a dwelling, or other
establishment, or group thereof, which uses subsurface soil
treatment and disposal.
(38) Invert. "Invert" means the lowest point of a channel inside a
pipe.
(39) Maximum Monthly Average Daily Flow. "Maximum
monthly average daily flow" means the 30 -day average daily
flow for the highest consecutive 30 -day period during the
year.
(40) Mottling. "Mottling" means a zone of chemical oxidation and
reduction activity, appearing as splotchy patches of red,
brown, orange, and gray in the soil, which are less than 2
chroma.
6
(41) Mound System. "Mound system" means a system where soil
treatment area is built above the ground to overcome limits
imposed by proximity to water table or bedrock, or by slow
permeable soils.
(42) Ordinary High Water Level_ "Ordinary high water level"
means the boundary of public waters and wetlands, that is an
elevation delineating the highest water level maintained for a
sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the
landscape, commonly that point where the natural vegetation
changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly
terrestrial.
For watercourses, the ordinary high water level is the
elevation of the top of the bank of a channel. For reservoirs
and flowages the ordinary high water level must be the
operating elevation of the normal summer pool.
(43) Original , Soil. "Original soil" means naturally occurring
inorganic soil that has not been moved, smeared, compacted,
nor manipulated with construction equipment.
(44) Other Establishment "Other establishment" means any
public or private structure other than a dwelling that
generates sewage.
(45) Owner. "Owner" means all persons having possession of,
control over, or title to an individual sewage treatment
system.
(46) Percolation Rate. "Percolation rate" means the time rate of
drop of a water surface in a test hole as specified in Section
953(d) (12).
(47) Permitting Authority. "Permitting authority" means any
county, municipality or state agency that administers the
provisions of these standards.
(48) Plastic Limit. "Plastic limit" means a soil moisture content
below which the soil may be manipulated for purposes of
installing a soil treatment system, and above which
manipulation will cause compaction and puddling. The soil
moisture content at the plastic limit can be measured by
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) test
number D4318 -84.
(49) Previously Developed Site. Land already containing a
dwelling or other establishment.
(50) Public Health Nuisance. Public health nuisance means any
activity or failure to act that adversely affects the public
health.
(51) Public Waters. "Public waters" means any public waters or
wetlands as defined in Minnesota Statutes, identified as
public waters or wetlands by the inventory prepared pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes.
(52) Replacement. "Replacement" means the replacement of an
existing individual sewage treatment system.
(53) Required Absorption Width. "Required absorption width"
means that width, measured in the direction of the original
land slope and perpendicular to the original contours, which is
required for the sewage tank effluent to infiltrate into the
original - soil according to the allowable loading rates in
Section 9- 953(20) Table V.
(54) Restaurants. "Restaurants" shall mean any place where
food. is prepared and intended for individual portion service
regardless of whether consumption is on or off the premises
or whether there is a charge for the food although this does
not include private homes.
(55) Saturated Soil. "Saturated soil" means the highest elevation
in the soil where periodically depleted oxygen levels occur
because of soil voids being filled with water. The presence of
soil mottling or other information evidences saturated soil.
(56) Seepage Bed. "Seepage bed" means an excavated area
larger than 36 inches in width that contains drain field rock
and has more than one distribution pipe.
(57) Seepage Pit, or Leaching Pit, or Dry Well. "Seepage pit, or
leaching pit, or dry well" means an underground pit into which
a sewage tank discharges effluent or other liquid waste and
from which the liquid seeps into the surrounding soil through
the bottom and openings in the side of the pit.
(58) Seppage. " Septage" means those solids and liquids removed
during periodic maintenance of a septic or aerobic tank, or
�411-
those solids and liquids that are removed from a toilet, waste
treatment device, or a holding tank.
(59) Setback. "Setback" means a separation distance measured
horizontally.
(60) Sewage. "Sewage" means any water carried domestic
waste, exclusive of footing and roof drainage, from any
industrial, agricultural, or commercial establishment, or any
dwelling or any other structure.. Domestic waste includes
liquid waste produced by toilets, bathing, laundry, culinary
operations, and the floor drains associated with these
sources, and specifically excludes animal waste and
commercial or industrial wastewater.
(61) Sewage Flow. "Sewage flow" means flow as determined by
measurement of actual water use or, if actual measurements
are unavailable, as estimated by the best available data.
(62) Sewage Tank. "Sewage tank" means a watertight tank used
in the treatment of sewage and includes, but is not limited to,
septic tanks and aerobic tanks.
(63) Sewage Tank Effluent. "Sewage tank effluent" means that
liquid which flows from a septic or aerobic tank under normal
operation.
(64) Septic Tank_ "Septic tank" means any watertight, covered
receptacle designed and constructed to receive the discharge
of sewage from a building sewer, separate solids from liquid,
digest organic matter, and store liquids through a period of
detention, and allow the clarified liquids to discharge to a soil
treatment system.
(65) Shoreland. "Shoreland" means land located within the
following distances from public waters: 1,000 feet from the
ordinary high water mark of a lake, pond or flowage; and 300
feet from a river or stream or the landward extent of a
floodplain designated by ordinance on such a river or stream,
whichever is greater.
(66) Site. "Site" means the area bounded by the dimensions
required for the proper location of the soil treatment system.
(67) Slo e. "Slope" means the ratio of vertical rise or fall to
horizontal distance.
9
(68) Soil Characteristics, Limiting. "Soil characteristics, limiting"
means those soil characteristics that preclude the installation
of a standard system, including evidence of water table or
bedrock and percolation rates faster than one -tenth or slower
than 60 minutes per inch.
(69) Soil Textural Classification. "Soil textural classification,"
where soil particle sizes or textures are specified in this
chapter, they refer to the soil textural classification in the Soil
Survey Manual, Handbook No. 18, United States Department
of Agriculture, 1993.
(70) Soil Treatment Area. "Soil treatment area" means that area
of trench or bed bottom that is in direct contact with the drain
field rock of the soil treatment system, and for mounds, that
area to the edges of the required absorption width and
extending five feet beyond the ends of the rock layer.
(71) Soil Treatment System. "Soil treatment system" means a
system where sewage tank effluent is treated and disposed
of below the ground surface by filtration and percolation
through the soil, and includes those systems commonly
known as seepage bed, trench, drain field, disposal field, and
mounds.
(72) Standard System. "Standard system" means an individual
sewage treatment system employing a building sewer,
sewage tank, and the soil treatment system consisting of
trenches, seepage beds, or mounds that are constructed on
original soil that has a percolation rate equal to or faster than
60 minutes per inch.
(73) Surface Water Flooding. "Surface water flooding" means
the 100 -year floodplain along rivers and streams as defined by
the Department of Natural Resources, or in the absence of
such data, as defined by the largest flood of record; on lakes,
high water levels as determined or recorded by the
Department of Natural Resources or, in the case of no
Department of Natural Resources record, by local records or
experience. Other surface water flooding or high water areas
should be determined by local information.
(74) Ten -year Flood. "Ten -year flood" means that flood which
can be expected to occur, on an average, of once in ten
10
years; or the level to which flood water's have a ten percent
chance of rising in any given year.
(75) Toilet Waste. "Toilet waste" means fecal matter, urine, toilet
paper, and any water used for flushing.
(76) Toilet Waste Treatment Devices. "Toilet waste treatment
devices" means privies and other devices including
incinerating, composting, biological, chemical, recirculating,
or holding tanks.
(77) Water Table. "Water table" means the highest elevation in
the soil where all voids are filled with water, as evidenced by
presence of water or soil mottling or other'information.
(78) Watertight. "Watertight" means a sewage tank constructed
so that no water can get into or out of the sewage tank except
through the inlet and outlet pipes.
(79) Wild and Scenic River Land Use District. "Wild and scenic
river land use district" means those lands designated by the
commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources as the
protected land corridor along those rivers or river segments
designated as wild, scenic, or recreational rivers.
SECTION 9 -953. GENERAL PROVISIONS
9 -953 Applicability.
9 -953 (a) The owner, builder or developer of a property must connect to the city sewer within
one (1) year system when building or remodeling a structure where the building or use
produces sewage. If municipal sanitary sewer is not available to a site or property, then any
use, building or structure producing sewage shall have an individual sewage treatment system
(ISTS). The city engineer shall determine if municipal sewer is available to a site or a property.
9- 953(b) Administration by Federal Agencies. Industrial wastewater systems and
individual sewage treatment systems serving more than 20 persons (1200 gallons per day)
are regulated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as Class V injection
wells under Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 144.
9- 953(c) Administration By State Agencies. For an individual sewage treatment system,
or group of individual sewage treatment systems, that are located on adjacent properties
and under single ownership, the owner or owners shall make application for and obtain a
state disposal system permit if the individual sewage treatment system or systems are
designed to treat an average daily flow greater than 10,000 gallons per day.
11
The systems must, at a minimum, conform to the requirements of these standards.
For dwellings such as rental apartments, town houses, resort units, rental cabins, and
condominiums, the sum of the flows from all existing and proposed sources under single
management or ownership will be used to determine the need for a state disposal system
permit.
Individual sewage treatment systems serving establishments or facilities licensed or
otherwise regulated by the State of Minnesota shall conform to the requirements of these
standards.
Any individual sewage treatment system requiring approval by the State of Minnesota
shall also comply with this ordinance and all local codes and ordinances.
9- 953(d) Administration of This Ordinance. All individual sewage treatment systems
installed after the adoption of this ordinance and all alterations, extensions, modifications or
repairs to existing systems, irrespective of the date of original installation, shall be regulated
in accordance with all requirements of this ordinance.
i
Existing systems that show evidence of sewage tank effluent discharge to the ground
surface, ground or surface waters or otherwise represent an imminent threat to public
health or safety shall be replaced within thirty (30) days of notice and order to comply by the
department. Any further surface discharge of effluent must be stopped immediately
(by such methods as reducing or stopping all water use, or pumping the tank as necessary)
until such time as the system is replaced. All tanks taken out of service must be properly
abandoned. (See Section 9- 953(e)(16).
9- 953(e) General Requirements.
(1 } Surface Discharge. Unless specifically permitted by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), sewage, sewage tank effluent, or
seepage from a soil treatment system shall not be discharged to the ground
surface, abandoned wells, or bodies of surface water, or into any rock or
soil formation the structure of which is not conducive to purification of water
by filtration, or into any well or other excavation in the ground.
All new or existing systems which discharge to surface waters or the
ground surface must obtain either a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) or State Disposal System Permit from the
MPCA and shall comply with all requirements pertaining thereto.
(2) Treatment Required. The system, or systems, shall be designed to
receive all sewage from the dwelling, building, or other establishment
served. Chemically treated hot tub or pool water, footing, roof drainage, or
garage floor drains shall, not enter any part of the system. Products
containing hazardous materials must not be discharged to the system other
12
than a normal amount of household products and cleaners designed for
household use. Substances not used for household cleaning, including
motor oil, solvents, pesticides, flammables, photo finishing chemicals, or
dry cleaning chemicals, must not be discharged to the system.
(3) System Components. The system shall consist of a building sewer,
sewage tank, and soil treatment system. All sewage shall be treated in a
sewage tank or toilet waste treatment device, and the sewage tank effluent
shall be discharged to the soil treatment system.
(4) Prohibited Installations. Cesspools, seepage pits, dry wells, and leaching
pits shall not be installed and shall not remain in operation.
(5) Location. Sewage treatment systems and each component thereof shall
be located and installed to insure that, with proper maintenance, it will
function in a sanitary manner, will not create a nuisance nor contaminate
any domestic supply well.
The location of a system shall consider lot size and configuration, proposed
structures and other improvements, topography, surface drainage, soil
conditions, depth to ground water, geology, existing and proposed water
supply wells, accessibility for maintenance, and expansion or replacement
of the system.
Installation of systems in low swampy areas, drainage swales or area
subject to recurrent flooding is prohibited. Systems shall not be located
within utility or drainage easements nor within dedicated public or private
rights-of-way.
(6) Clear Water Waste. Uncontaminated clear water waste from geothermal
heat pump installations shall not be introduced into individual sewage
treatment systems. Such waste may be discharged to the ground surface
or to a body of water, however in no case shall surface discharge be
permitted where such discharge encroaches on an adjoining property or
public way. Where subsurface disposal is provided, such installation shall
be separated from the required sewage treatment site and shall be
designed and sized as prescribed for a standard soil treatment system.
(7) System Sizing. Where the construction of additional bedrooms, the
installation of mechanical equipment, or other factors likely to affect the
operation of the system can be reasonably anticipated, the installation or
expansion of a system for such anticipated need shall be required.
(8) Site Evaluation. Before the city issues a building permit for new
construction or to add bedrooms to existing homes, or a permit to install an
individual sewage treatment system, or approval in the case of subdivision
13
of land, a field investigation shall be conducted by the department or other
agent of all proposed sites for sewage treatment systems. Such
investigation shall include an evaluation as to:
(a) depth to the highest known or calculated ground water table or
bedrock;
(b) soil conditions, properties, and permeability;
(c) slope;
(d) the existence of lowlands, local surface depressions, and rock
outcrops;
(e) all setback requirements from: existing and proposed buildings;
property lines; sewage tanks; soil treatment systems; water supply
wells; buried water pipes and utility lines; the ordinary high water
level of public waters; and the location of all soil treatment systems
and water supply wells on adjoining lots within 100 feet of the
proposed soil treatment system, sewage tank, and water supply well;
and
(f) surface water flooding probability.
(9) Soil Testing. Applicants for sewage treatment system permits, site
or subdivision approvals will be required to submit soil test data
derived from soil borings and percolation tests for each proposed
site or installation. The minimum testing shall be that necessary to
verify suitable conditions for two complete soil treatment systems
including detailed site plan and design. No permit will be issued until
a detailed system design is submitted for the current proposed
construction, including site plan and at least one current boring if
there is any reason to believe soil conditions have been altered
since the original soil testing. Large systems designed for 1,200
gallon per day or more shall require a hydro geologic investigation in
accordance with Section 9- 959(c).
(10) Conduct of Tests. All testing shall be conducted in accordance
with the requirements of this ordinance and shall be done by
qualified personnel, certified under the MPCA training and
certification program and licensed by the MPCA. All proposed sites
for sewage treatment systems shall be protected by fence or other
methods as necessary to avoid excavations, construction equipment
or other traffic that could affect the soil conditions.
14
(11) Soil Borings.
(a) Subdivision Testing. Enough borings must be done to
assure that suitable soils exist for each lot for long -term
sewage treatment. Percolation tests are not required unless
the- permeability cannot be estimated, or there is any reason
to believe the soil is not original or has been compacted.
(b) Permit Requirements. Complete testing on each individual
lot will be required prior to permit. issuance independent of
any subdivision testing. A minimum of four (4) satisfactory
soil borings outlining an area of 5,000 square feet are
required. Larger areas may be required where conditions of
use, soils, topography, or vegetation require. Where soil
tests require a mound, .testing and design must clearly show
suitable area for installation of two (2) complete mounds.
(Where site conditions are such that the only backup
mound will likely be disturbed, the Department, at its
discretion, may require both mounds to be constructed at
once.)
(c) Soil borings shall be made as follows:
(1) Borings shall be by auger or excavation and shall be
staked and protected . until notification that field
evaluation has been completed. Flite augers, which
are non - continuous or disturb extracted soil samples,
are not allowed. Borings shall be made to a depth at
least four (4) feet deeper than the bottom of the
proposed system or until bedrock or a water table is
encountered, whichever is less.
(2) Any evidence of disturbed or compacted soil must be
disclosed and may result in the prohibition of utilizing
that test area.
(3) Particular effort shall be made to determine the
highest known water table by recording the first
occurrence of mottling observed in the hole, or if
mottling is not encountered, the open holes in clay or
loam soils shall be observed after standing
undisturbed a minimum, of 16 hours, and depth to
standing water, if present, shall be. measured.
15
(d) A soil description shall be written for each soil observation at the
proposed site. Soils should only be evaluated under adequate light
conditions with the soil in a moist state and including the following:
(1) The depth of each soil horizon measured from
the ground surface. Soil horizons are
differentiated by changes in soil structure, soil
texture, soil color, mottling, bedrock, or any
other characteristic that may affect water
percolation or treatment of effluent.
(2) The soil matrix and mottled color described per
horizon by the Munsell Soil Color Charts,
1992 Revised Edition, which is incorporated by
reference. This document is available from
Macbeth Division, Kollmorgen Instruments
Corporation, Munsell Color, P.O. Box 230,
Newburgh, New York 12551 -0230.
It can be found at the Minnesota State Law
Library, Judicial Center, 25 Constitution
Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155, and is
not subject to frequent change;
(3) The soil texture described using the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil
classification system as modified below:
Minnesota USDA
Clay = Clay, sand clay, silty clay
Clay Loam = Clay loam, sandy clay loam, silty clay loam
Loam = Loam
Sandy loam = Sandy Loam
Silt loam = Silt loam, silt
Loamy sand = Loamy sand
Coarse sand = Coarse sand
(Medium) sand = (Medium) sand
Fine sand = Fine and very fine sand
(12) Percolation Tests. After soil borings have outlined the minimum area of
suitable soils, percolation tests shall be made as follows:
16
EXCEPTION: For sandy soils clearly in the 5 mpi range percolation tests
will not be required, however, the design rate for sizing shall be 1.27 square
feet per gallon.
(a) Test hole dimensions and locations:
(1) Each test hole shall be six to eight inches in diameter, have
vertical sides, and be bored or dug to the depth of the bottom
of the proposed individual sewage treatment system.
(2) Soil texture descriptions shall be recorded noting depths
where texture changes occur.
(b) Preparation of the test hole:
(1) The bottom and sides of the hole shall be carefully scratched
to remove any smearing and to provide a natural soil surface
into which water may penetrate.
(2) All loose material shall be removed from the bottom of the
test hole and two inches of one - fourth to three - fourths inch
gravel shall be added to protect the bottom from scouring.
(c) Soil saturation and swelling:
(1) The hole shall be carefully filled with clear water to a
minimum depth of 12 inches over the soil at the bottom of the
test hole and maintained for no less than four hours. Failure
to adequately saturate the test hole may result in rejection of
the test.
(2) The soil shall then be allowed to swell for at least 16, but no
more than 30 hours. In sandy soils, the saturation and
swelling procedure shall not be required and the test may
proceed if one filling of the hole has seeped away in less than
ten minutes.
(d) Percolation rate measurement: In sandy soils adjust the water depth
to eight inches over the soil at the bottom of the test hole. From a
fixed reference point, the drop in water level shall be measured in
inches to the nearest one - eighth inch at approximately ten - minute
intervals. A measurement can also be made by determining the
time it takes for the water level to drop one inch from an eight inch
reference point. If eight inches of water seeps away in less than ten
minutes, a shorter interval between measurements shall be used,
but in no case shall the water depth exceed eight inches. The test
17
shall continue until three consecutive percolation rate measurements
vary by a range of no more than ten percent.
In other soils, adjust the water depth to eight inches over the
soil at the bottom of the test hole. From a fixed reference point, the
drop in water level shall be measured in inches to the nearest one -
eighth inch at approximately 30- minute intervals, refilling between
measurements to maintain an eight -inch starting head. The test
shall continue until three consecutive percolation rate measurements
vary by a range of no more than ten percent.
The percolation rate can also be made by observing the time it takes
the water level to drop one inch from an eight inch reference point if
a constant water depth of at least eight inches has been maintained
for at least four hours prior to the measurement.
(e) Calculating the percolation rate. Divide the time interval by the drop
in water level to obtain the percolation rate in minutes per inch. The
slowest final percolation rate for all holes within the soil treatment
area shall be used for design.
(f) Frost. A percolation test shall not be run where frost exists below
the depth of the proposed soil treatment system.
(13) Construction and Materials.
(1) Building Sewers.
(A) Plumbing and Well Codes. The design, construction, and
location of, and the materials for use in building sewers are
governed by the Minnesota State Building Code, chapter 1300,
which incorporates by reference portions of the Minnesota Plumbing
Code, chapter 4715, and by specific provisions of the Minnesota
Water Well Construction Code, Minn. Rules Chapter 4725.
(B) Water meter. All new individual sewage treatment systems
defined as mounds, alternative systems, or systems intended to
serve other establishments as defined in Section 9- 952(d) (44) must
not be installed unless a water meter is provided to measure the flow
to the treatment system. For metered systems that have septic tank
effluent pumped to a soil treatment area, an electrical event counter
must also be installed.
(2) Sewage Tanks.
18
(A) In general. All tanks,. regardless of material or method of
construction, must:
1) Be watertight;
2) Be designed and constructed to withstand all lateral
earth pressures under saturated soil conditions with
the tank empty, including proper ballasting (to avoid
possible flotation) where the severity of conditions
require it;
3) Be designed and constructed with adequate tensile
and compressive strength to withstand a minimum of
seven feet of saturated earth cover above the tank top
and manhole cover;
4) Not be subject to corrosion or decay; and
5) Have the manufacturer's name, model number, and
tank capacity in gallons permanently displayed on the
tank above the outlet pipe.
6) Have a written and graphic label affixed to the
maintenance hole cover warning of the hazardous
conditions inside the tank.
Any tank not having an integrally cast bottom shall not be
installed when the water table is closer than three inches to
the bottom of the excavation at the .time of construction.
(B) Design of septic tanks. All tanks, regardless of material or
method of construction, shall conform to the following criteria:
1) The liquid depth of any septic tank or compartment
thereof shall be not less than 30 inches. A liquid
depth greater than six and one -half feet shall not be
considered in determining tank capacity.
2) No tank or compartment thereof shall have an inside
horizontal dimension less than 24 inches.
3) Inlet and outlet connections of the tank shall be
submerged by means of baffles.
4) The space in the tank between the liquid surface and
the top of the inlet and outlet baffles shall be not less
19
than 20 percent of the total required liquid capacity,
except that in horizontal cylindrical tanks this space
shall be not less than 15 percent of the total required
liquid capacity.
5) Inlet and outlet baffles shall be constructed of acid
resistant concrete, acid resistant fiberglass, or plastic.
6) Baffles must be integrally cast with the tank, affixed
with a permanent waterproof adhesive, or affixed with
stainless steel connectors, top and bottom. Sanitary
tees, which are used as baffles, shall be affixed to the
inlet or outlet pipes with a permanent waterproof
adhesive._
7) The inlet baffle shall extend at least six inches but not
more than 20 percent of the total liquid depth below
the liquid surface and at least one inch above the
crown of the inlet sewer.
8) The outlet baffle and the baffles between
compartments shall extend below the liquid surface a
distance equal to 40 percent of the liquid depth except
that the penetration of the indicated baffle or sanitary
tees for horizontal cylindrical tanks shall be 35 percent
of the total liquid depth. They also shall extend above
the liquid surface as required herein. In no case shall
they extend less than six inches above the liquid
surface. Gas deflecting baffles shall be installed on
the outlet of the final septic tank servicing other
establishments.
9) There shall be at least one inch between the
underside of the top of the tank and the highest point
of the inlet and outlet devices.
10) The inlet invert shall be not less than two inches
above the outlet invert.
11) The inlet and outlet shall be located opposite each
other along the axis of maximum dimension. The
horizontal distance between the nearest points of the
inlet and outlet devices shall be at least four feet.
12) Sanitary tees, used as baffles, shall be at least four
(4) inches in diameter. Inlet baffles shall be no less
CO
than six (6) inches or no more than 12 inches
measured from the end of the inlet pipe to the
nearest point on the baffle. Outlet baffles shall be six
inches measured from beginning of the outlet pipe to
the nearest point on the baffle.
13) Access to the septic tank shall be as follows:
a) There shall be one or more manholes, at a
minimum of 20 inches least dimension, and located
within six feet of all walls of the tank.- Access to tanks
will be by manhole covers with, no more'than 6 inches
of cover. If the cover is exposed it must be secured to
prevent unauthorized entry if it is exposed.
b) There shall be an inspection pipe of at least
four inches diameter over both the inlet and outlet
devices. The inspection pipe shall extend through the
tank cover or the manhole cover and be capped flush
or above finished grade. A downward projection of
the centerline of the inspection pipe shall be directly in
line with the centerline of the inlet or outlet device.
c) An inspection pipe at least four inches in
diameter must be located between the inlet and outlet
baffles for the purpose of evaluating scum and sludge
accumulations.
The inspection pipe must extend through either
the tank cover or manhole cover and must be capped
flush with or above finished grade.
14) Compartmentation of single tanks.
a) Septic tanks larger than 3,000 gallons and
fabricated as a single unit shall be divided into
two or more compartments.
b) When a septic tank is divided into two
compartments, not less than one -half or more
than two - thirds of the total volume shall be in
the first compartment.
c) When a septic tank is divided into three or more
compartments, one -half of the total volume
shall be in the first compartment and the other
half equally divided in the other compartments.
21
d) Connections between compartments shall be
baffled so as to obtain effective retention of
scum and sludge. The submergence of the
inlet and outlet baffles of each compartment
shall, as specified herein.
e) Adequate venting shall be provided between
compartments by baffles or by an opening of at
least 50 square inches near the top of the
compartment wall
f) Adequate access to each compartment shall be
provided by one or more manholes; at least 20
inches least dimension, and located within six
feet of all walls of the tank. The manhole shall
extend through the tank cover to a point within
six (6) inches of finished grade. If the manhole
is covered with less than six inches of earth,
the cover must be secured to prevent
unauthorized access.
15) Multiple tanks.
a) Where more than one tank is used to obtain the
required liquid volume, the tanks shall be
connected in series.
b) Each tank shall comply with all other provisions
of Section 9-953(d)(1 3)(1)(A).
c) No more than four tanks in series can be used
to obtain the required liquid volume.
d) The first tank shall be no smaller than any
subsequent tanks in series.
16) Outlet pipe from septic tank.
a) The outlet pipe from the septic tank must not be
cast iron.
b) The outlet pipe extending from the septic tank
must be of sound and durable construction, not
subject to corrosion or decay.
22
c) The outlet pipe extending from the septic tank
to the undisturbed soil beyond the tank must
meet the strength requirements of American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM),
schedule 40 plastic pipe and must be
supported in a manner that there is no
deflection during the backfilling and subsequent
settling of the soil between the edge of the
septic tank and the edge of the excavation.
d) The soil around the pipe extending from the
septic tank must be compacted to original
density for a length of three feet beyond the
edge of the tank excavation.
9- 953(e)(14) Capacity of Septic Tanks. Capacity of septic tanks:
(A) Dwellings. There shall be two septic tanks in series with the
liquid capacity based on the number of bedrooms contemplated in the
dwelling served and shall be at least as large as the capacities given below.
EXCEPTION: Upgrade of existing conforming systems need not consist of
two (2) tanks in series assuming the primary tank capacity is met, and there
is no garbage disposal or sewage pump. System replacement shall require
two tanks in series.
Number of Bedrooms
I Tank Liquid
Capacities (Gallons)
2 or less
1,000 and 500
3 or 4 -
1,000 and 1,000
5 or 6
1,500 and 1,000
7 8 or 9
2,000 and 1,000
For ten or more bedrooms, the septic tank shall be sized as another
establishment with the second tank in series being at least 50 percent
capacity of the first tank. For multiple family dwellings containing two (2) or
more dwelling units, the size shall be the sum of the individual dwelling unit
requirements.
(B) Other establishments. The liquid capacity of a septic tank
serving. an establishment other than a dwelling shall be sufficient to provide a
sewage detention period of not less than 36 hours in the tank for sewage flows
23
less than 1,500 gallons per day, but in no instance shall the liquid capacity be
less than 750 gallons. For sewage flows greater than 1,500 gallons per day
the minimum liquid capacity shall equal 1,125 gallons plus 75 percent of the
daily sewage flow. For restaurants and laundromats, twice the liquid capacity
shown above must be provided. For laundromats the outlet baffle of the
septic tank must be submerged to a depth of 50 percent.
(C) Pumping of raw sewage. A sewage pump must not deliver
sewage to a one -tank system if the pump cycle delivers more than one
percent of the liquid capacity of the tank. For systems with multiple tanks, at
least two tanks in series must be used, each having at least the liquid capacity
specified in this subpart. The volume of sewage delivered in each pump cycle
must not exceed five percent of the liquid capacity of the first tank.
9- 953(e)(15) " Location of Septic Tanks. The sewage tank shall be placed so that it is
accessible .for the removal of liquids and accumulated solids. The soil
cover over a tank shall not exceed five (5) feet.
The sewage tank shall be placed on firm and settled soil capable of
bearing the weight of the tank and its contents.
IV.
Sewage tanks shall be set back as specified in Section 9- 953(2), Table
Sewage tanks shall not be placed in areas subject to flooding or in
floodplains, or in areas for which regional flood information is available from
the DN R.
9- 953(e)(16) Abandoned Tanks. At any time tanks are taken out of service they shall
be removed from the ground or abandoned in place by properly removing
all contents, disconnecting all lines, and filling the tank completely with soil.
Access for future discharge to the system shall be permanently denied.
9- 953(e)(17) Aerobic Tanks. Aerobic tank treatment systems shall comply with the
general requirements for sewage tanks set forth in this ordinance, and with
the following:
(1) The treatment system including each individual unit or compartment
shall be easily accessible for inspection and maintenance and shall
be provided with secured covers.
(2) Aerobic tanks shall comply with National Sanitation Foundation
Standard (NSF) No. 40 (November 1990). Effluent quality shall
meet or exceed NSF Class II Standards.
24
(3) An effective maintenance service contract shall be maintained for
the life of the unit and shall include inspections and effluent quality
checks at least semi - annually.
(4) No additional reduction in soil treatment area shall be allowed with
the use of an aerobic treatment tank.
9- 953(e)(18) Distribution of Effluent.
(1) All supply pipes must be protected from freezing when they pass
under driveways, sidewalks, roadways or other areas where deep
frost penetration . is expected.
(2) Gravity distribution.
(A) Serial distribution must be used to distribute effluent to
individual trenches in a soil treatment system unless the necessary
elevation differences between trenches for drop .boxes cannot be
achieved by natural topography or by varying the excavation depths,
in which case parallel distribution shall be used. If drop boxes are
used, they must meet the following standards.
1) The drop box shall be watertight and constructed of
durable materials not subject to corrosion or decay.
2) The invert of the inlet pipe shall be at least one inch
higher than the invert of the outlet pipe to the new
trench.
3) The invert of the outlet pipe to the next trench shall be
no greater than two inches higher than the invert of
the outlet pipe of the trench in which the box is
located.
4) When sewage tank effluent is delivered to the drop
box by a pump, the pump discharge shall be directed
against a wall. or side of the box on which there is no
outlet.
5) The drop box shall have a removable cover either
flush or above finished grade or covered by no more
than six inches of soil and must have a vertical
inspection pipe, capped flush with or above finished
grade.
(6) The distribution boxes must meet the following standards:
25
1) The box must be watertight with either a removable
cover or a clean out pipe extending to finished grade
and must be constructed of durable materials not
subject to corrosion or decay.
2) The inverts of all outlets must be at the same
elevation.
3) The inlet invert must be either at least one inch above
the outlet inverts or be sloped such that an .equivalent
elevation above the outlet invert is obtained within the
last eight feet of the inlet pipe.
4) Each drain field trench line must be connected
separately to the distribution box and must not be
subdivided.
5) When sewage tank effluent is delivered to the
distribution box by pump, either a baffle wall must be
installed in the distribution box or the pump discharge
must be directed against a wall or side of the box on
which there is no outlet. The baffle must be secured
to the box and must extend at least one inch above
the crown of the inlet flow line.
(C) Distribution pipes.
1) Distribution pipes used in trenches or beds for gravity
distribution must be at least four inches in diameter
and must be constructed of sound and durable
material not subject to corrosion or decay orto loss of
strength under continuously wet conditions.
2) Perforated pipe used for sewage distribution pipes
must have one or more rows of holes of no less than
one -half inch in diameter spaced no more than 40
inches apart. Holes must be spaced to prevent failure
due to loads. Distribution pipes must have a load
bearing capacity of not less than 1,000 pounds per
lineal foot.
3) The distribution pipes for gravity distribution must be
laid level or on a uniform slope away from the
distribution device of no more than four inches per
100 feet.
26
4) Other devices such as corrugated tubing wrapped with
a permeable synthetic material or a chambered trench
or bed maybe used to distribute sewage tank effluent
over the soil treatment area upon approval of the
department.
(3) Pressure distribution.
(A) Pressure distribution must be used for the following soil treatment
systems:
1) All mound systems;
2) All at- grade systems; and
3) Systems where the soil percolation rate is 0.1 to
five minutes per inch if the effluent is pumped to a
seepage bed or to trenches that are all at the same
elevation.
(B) Distribution pipes used for pressure distribution must be constructed
of sound and durable material not subject to corrosion or decay orto
loss. of strength under continuously wet conditions.
(C) All pipes and associated fittings used for pressure distribution must
be properly joined together. The pipe and connections must be able
to withstand a pressure of at least 40 pounds per square inch.
(D) Perforations must be no. smaller than 3/16 -inch diameter and no
larger than one - quarter inch diameter. The number of perforations,
perforation spacing, and pipe size for pressure distribution laterals
must be as shown in Table 1. The friction loss in any individual
perforated lateral must not exceed 20 percent of the average
pressure head on the perforations.
Maximum Allowable Number of One - Fourth -Inch Diameter, or Smaller, Perforations
Per Lateral.
27
if M Wa
(A) Perforation holes must be drilled straight into the pipe and not
at an angle. The perforated pipe laterals_ must be installed level with the
perforations downward. Perforation holes must be free of burrs.
(B) Laterals must be spaced no further than 60 inches apart and
must be spaced no further than a horizontal distance of 30 inches from the
bottom edge of a drain field rock layer.
(C) Laterals must be connected to a header or manifold pipe that
is of a diameter such that the friction loss in the header or manifold will be no
greater than five percent of the average head at perforations. The header
or manifold pipe must be connected to the supply pipe from the pump.
(D) Perforated laterals must be designed and installed in such a
way that no perforations are located closer than 12 inches from the edge of
the drain field rock.
9- 953(e)(19) Lift Station.
(1) Lift. Station. A lift station, where used, shall meet the following
requirements:
(A) The lift station shall be watertight and constructed of sound
and durable materials not subject to excessive corrosion or decay, vented, and
must be designed and constructed to withstand lateral pressures when the
tank is empty.
(B) There shall be one or more maintenance holes, at least 20
inches least dimension and located directly above the pump. The
28
Pipe Diameter, Normal and Inside
Perforation
1"
1 ' /4'
1 %2"
2"
Spacing in feet
1.049
1.380
1.610
2.067
2.5
8
14
18
28
3
8
13
17
26
3.3
7
12
16
25
4
7
11
15
23
5
6
10
14
22
(A) Perforation holes must be drilled straight into the pipe and not
at an angle. The perforated pipe laterals_ must be installed level with the
perforations downward. Perforation holes must be free of burrs.
(B) Laterals must be spaced no further than 60 inches apart and
must be spaced no further than a horizontal distance of 30 inches from the
bottom edge of a drain field rock layer.
(C) Laterals must be connected to a header or manifold pipe that
is of a diameter such that the friction loss in the header or manifold will be no
greater than five percent of the average head at perforations. The header
or manifold pipe must be connected to the supply pipe from the pump.
(D) Perforated laterals must be designed and installed in such a
way that no perforations are located closer than 12 inches from the edge of
the drain field rock.
9- 953(e)(19) Lift Station.
(1) Lift. Station. A lift station, where used, shall meet the following
requirements:
(A) The lift station shall be watertight and constructed of sound
and durable materials not subject to excessive corrosion or decay, vented, and
must be designed and constructed to withstand lateral pressures when the
tank is empty.
(B) There shall be one or more maintenance holes, at least 20
inches least dimension and located directly above the pump. The
28
maintenance hole shall extend through the lift station cover to final grade and
shall be so constructed as to prevent unauthorized entry.
(C) The lift station shall either include an alternating two -pump
system or have a minimum total capacity of 500 gallons or 100 percent of the
average design flow, whichever is greater.
(D) A lift station must have an alarm device to warn of failure.
(E) Pumps shall be elevated from the bottom of the lift station to
protect the pump from settled solids. The pump, pump controls, and pump
discharge line shall be installed so as to be accessible for servicing- without
entering the lift station.
(F), Electrical installations shall comply with applicable laws and
ordinances including the latest codes, rules, and regulations.
(2) Lift stations for gravity distribution:
(A) Where a lift station is employed, a pump or siphon shall
deliver the dose to'the soil treatment unit for gravity distribution over the soil
treatment area.
(B) For dwellings, the dosing device shall discharge at Feast 600
gallons per hour but no more than 2,700 gallons per hour.
(C) For other establishments, the dosing device should discharge
at a rate at least ten percent greater than the water supply flow rate but no
faster than the rate at which effluent will flow out of the distribution device.
(D) If the dosing device is a siphon, a maintenance inspection
shall be made every six months by the owner or the owner's agent. The
siphon shall be maintained in proper operating condition.
(E) If the dosing device is a pump, it shall be cast iron or bronze
fitted and with stainless steel screws or constructed of other sound, durable,
and corrosion - resistant materials.
(F) Where the soil treatment area is at a higher elevation than the
pump, sufficient dynamic head shall be provided for both the elevation
difference and friction loss.
(G) Where the dosing device is a pump, an alarm device shall be
installed to warn of pump failure.
(3) Dosing devices for pressure distribution;
29
(A) The dosing device shall be a pump which is cast iron or
bronze fitted and with stainless steel screws or constructed of sound, durable,
and corrosion- resistant materials.
(B) The pump discharge capacity shall be based upon the
perforation discharges for an average head of 1.0 foot for residential systems
and 2.0 feet for other establishments. Perforation discharge will be
determined by the following formula:
q = 19.65 cd 4h
where:
q = discharge in gallons per minute
c = 0.60 coefficient of discharge
d = perforation diameter in inches
h = head in feet
(C) The pump discharge head shall be at least five feet greater
than the head required to overcome pipe friction- losses and the elevation
difference between the pump and the distribution device.
(D) The quantity of effluent delivered for each pump cycle shall be
no greater than 25 percent of one day's sewage flow.
(E) An alarm device shall be installed to warn of pump failure.
(F) A siphon will not be allowed as a lift station to deliver effluent
to a pressure distribution system.
9- 953(e)(20) Final Treatment and Disposal.
(1) Final treatment and disposal of all sewage tank effluent shall be by
discharge into a soil treatment system.
(2) Standard system.
(A) Sizing:
1) The required soil treatment area shall be determined
by the daily sewage flow, and the measured percolation rate of the
soil.
2) Acceptable methods for estimating sewage flow for
dwellings are given in Table II. The minimum daily sewage flow
estimated for any dwelling shall provide for at least two bedrooms.
For multiple residential units, the estimated daily sewage flow shall
consist of the sum of the flows of each individual unit.
30
TABLE 11
Number of Bedrooms
Gallons per day
2
300
3
450
4
600
5
750
6
900
If a grey water system is employed, estimated sewage flow
equals 60 percent of the amount provided in Table 11.
(1) For other establishments, average design flow shall be used
to size soil treatment systems. Maximum design flow shall be
used to size sewage tanks. Design flows shall be calculated
using estimated or measured values for other establishments
according to items a. and b.
a) Estimated average and maximum design flows: the
best available data as provided by the agency shall
be used if estimating the average and maximum
design flows.
b) Measured average and maximum design flows:
1. the average design flow shall be determined by
averaging the measured daily flows for a
consecutive seven -day period in which the
establishment is at maximum capacity or use;
and;
2. the maximum design flow shall
be the anticipated peak daily flow.
2) Table III (next page) gives the required trench bottom area
assuming 12 inches of drain field rock below the distribution
pipe. The required bottom area may be reduced, for
trenches only, by the following percentages: 20 percent for
18 inches of drain field rock below the distribution pipe; and
34 percent for 24 inches. Unless pressure distribution is
used, all seepage bed bottom area must be 1.7 times the
soil treatment areas required in Table 111. With pressure
distribution, the bottom area must be 1.2 times the soil
treatment area required in Table 111.
31
TABLE III
Percolation Rate
(minutes per inch)
Soil Texture
0.1-
5
6 -15
16 -30
31 -45
46 -60
NUMBER
OF BEDROOMS
TANK SIZE
GALLONS
PER DAY
SQUARE FEET
2
1000 + 500
300
250
380
500
600
660
3
1000 +1000
450
380
570
750
900
990
4
1000 +1000
600
500
760
1000
1200
1320
5
1500 +1000
750
630
950
1250
1500
1650
6
1500 +1000
900
750
1140
1500
1800
1980
7
2000 +1000
1050
870
1330
1750
2100
2310
8
2000 +1000
1200
990-
1520
2000
2400
2640
SQUARE FEET
PER GALLON
.83
1.27
1.67
2
2.20
TABLE III (continued)
Percolation Rate in
inch (MPI )
Soil Texture
Square Feet Per
Gallon Per Day
Gallons Per Day
Per Square Foot
Faster than 0.1 *
Coarse Sand
- - - --
- - - --
0.1 to 5 **
Sand
0.83
1.20
0.1 to 5
Fine Sand * **
1.67
0.60
6 to 15
Sandy Loam
1.27
0.79
16 to 30
Loam
1.67
0.60
31 to 45
Silt Loam
2.00
0.50
46 to 60
Clay Loam
2.20
0.45
Slower than 60 * * **
Clay
- - - --
- - - --
See below for explanation of asterisks ( *).
32
Soil too coarse for sewage treatment.
** Distribution of sewage effluent shall be by pressure flow over the treatment area or by
dividing treatment area into a minimum of four (4) equal parts connected serially, by
means of drop boxes.
* ** For soils having more than 50 percent of very fine sand by weight, plus fine sand
having a particle size range of 0.05 millimeters (sieve size 270) to 0.25 millimeters
(sieve size 60), the required soil treatment area is 1.67 square feet per gallon of
sewage flow per day.
* * ** Soil with too high a percentage of clay for installation of an in ground standard
system.
(A) Location:
1) On slopes in excess of 12 percent, the soil profile shall be carefully
evaluated in the location of the proposed soil treatment system and down
slope to identify the presence of layers with different permeability's that may
cause side hill seepage. In no case shall a trench be located within 15 feet
of where such a layer surfaces on the down slope.
2) Bed construction shall be limited to areas having natural slopes of less than
six percent.
3) Soil treatment systems shall be located as specified on Table IV.
33
TABLE IV.
MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCES (FEET)
FEATURE
SEWAGE
TANK
SOIL
TREATMENT
AREA
Water Supply well less than 50 feet deep and not
encountering at least ten feet of impervious
material
50
100
Any other water supply well or buried water
suction pipe
50
50
B uried pip distributing water under pressure
10
10
Occupied buildings & buildings with basements or crawl
spaces
10
20
Non- occupied structures
5
5
Property lines
10*
10*
Above ground swimming pools
10
10
In ground swimming pools
10
20
THE ORDINARY HIGH W ATER MARK OF:
LS -1 Natural Environment Lakes & Streams
150 **
150 **
LS -2 Recreation Development Lakes & Streams
75 **
75 **
LS -3 General Development Lakes & Streams
75 **
75 **
All unclassified waters
75 **
75 **
BLUFF LINES:
Shoreland Bluff lines (18% Slope)
20 **
20 **
* May be altered only through normal variance process.
** May be varied through Shoreland Management Ordinance.
4) Soil treatment areas shall not be placed in areas subject to flooding or in
floodplains or in areas for which regional flood information is available from
the DNR.
(B) Design and construction:
1) The bottom of trenches and beds shall be at least three feet above the
water table or bedrock.
2) The trenches shall be not less than 18 inches or more than 36 inches wide.
Any excavation wider than 36 inches shall be considered a bed. No bed
34
may be wider than 25 feet and parallel beds must not be located closer
than ten feet apart.
3) The bottom of the trench or bed excavation shall be level.
4) The bottom and sides of the soil treatment system to the top of the drain
field rock shall be excavated in such a manner as to leave the soil in a
natural, un- smeared, and un- compacted condition. Excavation shall be
made only when the soil moisture content is at or less than the plastic limit.
5) When the percolation rate is slower than 15 minutes per inch, excavation
shall be by backhoe or other means that allow the equipment wheels or
tracks to remain on the surface soil. Excavation equipment or other
vehicles shall not be driven on the soil treatment area.
6) There shall be a layer of at least 12 but no more than 24 inches of drain
field rock in the bottom of the trenches.
7) The drain field rock shall completely encase the top and sides of the
distribution pipes to a depth of at least two inches. The top of the drain field
rock in trenches, beds, and mounds must be level in all directions.
8) Drain field rock must be covered with a durable non -woven geotextile cover
specific to this purpose. The cover must be of sufficient strength to
undergo installation without rupture. In addition, the cover must permit
passage of water without allowing the passage of overlying soil material into
drain field rock.
9) The trenches or beds shall be backfilled and crowned above finished grade
to allow for settling. The top six inches of soil shall have the same texture
and density as the adjacent soil.
10) The minimum depth of cover over the distribution pipes shall be at least six
inches. The maximum depth of cover over the distribution pipes shall be no
more than 24 inches.
11) A vegetative cover shall be established over the soil treatment system. The
soil treatment system shall be protected until a vegetative cover is
established. The vegetative cover established shall not interfere with the
hydraulic performance of the system and shall provide adequate frost and
erosion protection.
12) A vertical inspection pipe at least 1 -1/2 inches in diameter must be installed
in each drain field rock layer of every trench or seepage bed. The
inspection pipe must be located at an end opposite from where the sewage
tank effluent enters the rock layer. The inspection pipe must have 3/8 inch
or larger perforations spaced vertically no more than six inches apart in the
35
rock layer, and must be solid pipe above. The inspection pipe must extend
to the bottom of the rock layer and must be capped flush with or above
finished grade.
13) All joints for gravel -less drain field pipes or chambered systems must be
secured as recommended by the manufacturer.
14) Backfilling for gravel -less drain field pipe and chambered systems shall not
crush or damage the medium.
(C) Gravel -less drain field pipe. Gravel -less drain field pipe, including appurtenances,
shall be:
1) of commercially fabricated corrugated pipe .completely encased by the
manufacturer in a geotextile wrap specific to this purpose;
2) an eight -inch or a ten -inch nominal ID pipe that meets the requirements,of
American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) F667, which is incorporated
by reference. The annual book of ASTM standards F667 "Standard
Specification for Large Diameter Corrugated Polyethylene Tubing and
Fittings" was issued in 1985 and is available at ASTM, 1916 Race Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19103. The standards can be found at the Minnesota Law
Library, Judicial Center, 25 Constitution Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55155
and are not subject to frequent change.
a) The pipes must be marked with an alignment stripe visible through
the geotextile wrap and installed with this stripe at top center.
b) The pipes shall contain a row or rows of cleanly cut three - eighths
inch to one -half inch diameter holes located in such a manner to
provide storage of solids. Each row shall contain a hole in every
other corrugation valley, staggered such that every corrugation
valley contains one hole.
3) Geotextile wraps specifically designed and tested for use with gravel -less
pipe and for installation and use in individual sewage treatment systems.
4) The sizing shall be 1.2 times the soil treatment area required in Table III.
5) Protected from heat and ultraviolet rays prior to installation.
(D) Chambered systems. Chamber media including all piping and appurtenances shall
be constructed:
1) of commercially fabricated materials specific to this purpose;
2) of materials resistant to sewage tank effluent;
36
3) with an open bottom;
4) to support the load of overburden and sidewall soil;
5) with slotted or perforated sides to allow sewage to move laterally into the
soil and prevent soil penetration into the chamber;
6) no greater than three (3) feet in width; and
7) with vertical outside dimensions less than 30 inches.
E) Dual field systems:
1} Dual field systems shall be used only where the percolation rate is slower
than five minutes per inch.
2) Dual field systems shall be sized, designed, and constructed as set forth
above for standard systems except as follows:
a) The soil treatment area shall be divided into two or more parts.
b) Alternating soil treatment areas shall each be connected to a valve
box outlet.
(2)
3) Apart of the soil treatment area shall be used no more than one year
unless inspection of the effluent level indicates that a longer duration can
be used.
Mounds.
(A) Mound Requirements
1) Mounds must be constructed on original soils so that there is at least
36 inches of separation between the bottom of the drain field rock
layer and limiting soil characteristics as defined in Section 9 -952.
2) There must be at least 18 inches of original soil with a percolation
rate. faster than 60 minutes per inch above the limiting soil
characteristics as defined in Section 9 -952.
EXCEPTIONS For Previously Developed Sites:
a) A depth of 12 to 18 inches of original suitable soil may be
used.
b) A 61 to 120 minutes per inch rate may be used.
37
3) If original soil conditions do not exist on a site proposed fora mound,
as defined in Section 9 -952, the site is unsuitable fora mound.
4) Absorption areas shall not be placed in areas subject to flooding as
described in Section 9- 955(d).
5) On slopes of one percent or greater, and where the percolation rate
in the top foot of original soil is in the 61 to 120 minutes per inch
range, mounds must not be located where the ground- surface
contour lines directly below the long axis of the rock bed represent a
swale or draw, unless the contour lines have a radius of curvature
greater than 100 feet. Mounds must never be located in swales or
draws where the radius of curvature of the contour lines is less than
50 feet. In no case shall mounds be placed on slopes greater than
12 percent. ,
(B) Design of mounds. Drain field rock must be used as the distribution medium in
mounds.
1) The bottom area of the rock bed shall be calculated by multiplying the
average design flow by 1.0 square feet per gallon per day.
2) The width of a single rock bed must not exceed ten feet.
3) A minimum of 12 inches of clean sand must be placed where the rock bed
is to be located.
4) The required absorption width is calculated by multiplying the rock bed
width by the absorption ratio. The absorption ratio shall be determined
according to Table V, using percolation rate of the upper 12 inches of soil in
the proposed absorption area.
5) A maximum of two (2) mounds maybe placed with side -by -side rock beds.
The required absorption width shall be increased by four (4) feet.
38
TABLE V
Percolation Rate of Original Soil
Under Sand Layer, Minutes Per
nch
Absorption Ratio
Faster than 5
1.00
6 to 15
1.50
16 to 30
2.00
31 to 45
2.40
46 to 60
2.67
61 to 120
5.00
6) The required absorption width for mounds constructed on slopes from zero
to one percent shall be centered under the rock bed width. The required
absorption width for mounds constructed on slopes greater than one
percent shall be measured down slope from the down slope edge of the
rock bed width and measured in the direction of the original land slope and
perpendicular to the original contours.
7) The side slopes on the mound must not be steeper than three (3) horizontal
units to one (1) vertical unit and shall extend beyond the required
absorption area, if necessary.
.8) On slopes of one (1) percent or greater, the upslope edge of the level drain
field rock bed must be placed on the contour.
9) Whenever mounds are located on slopes greater than one (1) percent, a
diversion must be constructed immediately upslope from the mound to
intercept and direct runoff.
10) Distribution of effluent over the rock bed must be by level perforated pipe
under pressure as specified in Section 9- 953(18).
11) The rock bed shall completely encase the top and sides of the distribution
pipes to a depth of at least two (2) inches above the pipe. The rock shall
extend nine (9) inches below the pipe.
12) A vertical inspection pipe at least 1 1 /2- inches in diameter shall be installed
and secured at each rock bed /sand interface of every mound.
39
The inspection pipe must have 3/8 inch or larger perforations spaced
vertically no more than six (6) inches apart. At least two (2) perforations
must be located in the rock bed. No perforations shall be located above the
permeable synthetic fabric. The inspection pipe must extend to the bottom
of the rock bed and must be capped flush with or above finished grade.
13) The rock bed must be covered with durable non -woven geotextile cover
specific to this purpose. The cover must be of sufficient strength to
undergo installation without rupture. In addition, the cover must permit
passage of water without passage of overlying soil material into the drain
field rock.
14) Sandy to loamy soil material must be placed on the rock bed to a depth of
one (1) foot in the center of the mound and to a depth of six (6) inches at
the sides. When two (2) rock beds are installed side by side, the soil
material must be 18 inches deep at the center of the mound and six (6)
inches deep at the sides.
15) Six (6) inches of topsoil must be placed over the entire mound. Topsoil
does not include peat soil textures.
(B) Surface preparation for mounds.
1) The supply pipe from the pump to the mound area must be installed before
mound soil surface preparation. The trench excavated for the supply pipe
must be carefully backfilled and compacted to prevent seepage of effluent.
2) All vegetation in excess of two (2) inches in length and dead organic debris
must be removed from the absorption area. Trees must be cut nearly flush
with the ground and stumps should not be removed.
3) All surface preparation must take place when the upper 12 inches of soil
has a moisture content of less than the plastic limit and soil conditions allow
field testing of soil properties and these properties are maintained
throughout installation.
4) The absorption area must be roughened by backhoe teeth or moldboard, or
chisel plowed to a depth of eight (8) inches. Discing is allowed if the upper
eight (8) inches of soil has a texture of sandy loam or coarser. If plowed,
furrows must be thrown uphill and there must not be a dead furrow in the
absorption area.
A rubber -tired tractor maybe used for plowing or discing. Rototilling
or pulverizing the soil is not allowed. The original soil must not be
excavated or moved more than one, foot from its original location during soil
surface preparation.
40
5) Before the placement of six (6) inches of clean sand, no vehicle shall be
driven on to the absorption area after the surface preparation is completed.
If rainfall occurs on the prepared surface, the site must be allowed to
dry below the plastic limit and roughened as specified above. .
(C) Mound construction.
1) The clean sand must be placed by using a construction technique that
minimizes compaction. If the clean sand is driven on for construction, a
crawler or track-type tractor must be used for mound construction. At least
six (6) inches of sand must be .kept beneath equipment to minimize
compaction of the prepared surface.
2) The sand layer upon which the rock bed is placed must be level in all
directions.
3) The top of the rock bed must be level in all directions.
4) Construction vehicles must not be allowed on the rock bed until backfill is
placed.
5) A vegetative cover must be established over the entire area of the mound.
The soil treatment system mound shall be protected until a vegetative cover
is established. The vegetative cover established shall not interfere with the
hydraulic performance of the system and shall provide adequate frost and
erosion protection.
6) Shrubs must not be planted on the top of the mound. Shrubs may be
placed at the foot and side slopes of the mound.
(2) At -grade systems.
(A) Location of at -grade systems.
(1) At -grade systems must be constructed on original soils so that there
is at least 36 inches of separation between the bottom of the rock
bed and saturated soil or bedrock.
(2) Percolation tests shall be conducted in the upper 12 inches of
original soil. At -grade systems are only allowed if constructed on
soils with percolation rates faster than 61 minutes per inch.
(3) At -grade systems shall not be installed in areas with slopes greater
than 12 percent.
41
(B) Design of at -grade systems.
(1) Rock bed absorption width shall be calculated by multiplying the
linear loading rate by the soil sizing factor as identified in
9- 953(d)(20) Table III, using the percolation rate of the upper 12
inches of soil in the proposed absorption area.
The linear loading rate shall be between two (2) and eight (8) gpd /ft
as determined by the relationship between vertical and horizontal
water movement in the soil. Total rock bed width for sloping ground
shall consist of the rock bed absorption width plus enough rock on
the upslope side to provide stability.
(2) Rock bed length shall be calculated by multiplying the soil- sizing
factor by the average design flow and dividing by the rock bed width.
At -grade systems shall be pressurized in accordance with Section 9-
953(d)(18). Distribution pipe shall be installed in the center of the
rock bed on slopes less than one (1) percent and on the upslope
edge of the rock bed absorption width on slopes one (1) percent or
greater.
(C) Construction of at -grade systems.
1) Surface preparation for at -grade systems shall be the same as mound
construction.
2) Drain field rock must be used as the distribution medium in at -grade
systems.
3) The upslope edge of an at -grade system shall be installed along the natural
contour.
4) The rock bed shall completely encase the top and sides of the distribution
pipe to a depth of at least two (2) inches above the pipe. There shall be at
least nine (9) inches of rock below the distribution pipe.
5) The entire rock bed shall be covered with a durable non -woven geotextile
cover specific to this purpose. The cover must be of sufficient strength to
undergo installation without rupture. In addition, the cover must permit
passage of water without allowing the passage of overlying soil material into
the drain field rock.
6) One foot of loamy or sandy cover material shall be installed over the rock
bed. Cover shall extend at least five (5) feet from the ends of the rock bed
and be sloped to divert surface water. Side slopes shall not be steeper
than four (4) horizontal units to one (1) vertical unit. The upper six (6)
inches of the loamy soil cover must be topsoil. Topsoil must be of a quality
42
that provides a good vegetative cover on the at -grade system and must
exclude peaty material.
7) Three (3) vertical inspection pipes of at least 1.5 inches in diameter shall be
installed and secured along the down slope portion of the rock bed. These
pipes shall be located within three (3) feet of the down slope edge of the
rock bed at the middle and one -sixth of the total rock bed length and placed
as measured from the ends of the rock bed. The inspection pipes shall
have 3/8 inch or larger perforations spaced vertically no more than six (6)
inches apart. No perforations shall exist above the permeable synthetic
fabric. The inspection pipes must extend to the rock bed /soil interface and
- must be stabilized and capped flush with or above finished grade.
8) A vegetative cover must be established over the entire area of the at -grade
system. The soil treatment at- grade system shall be protected - until a
vegetative cover is established. The vegetative cover shall not interfere
with the hydraulic performance of the system and shall provide adequate
frost and erosion protection.
ALTERNATIVE AND EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEMS
9 -954 General. The intent of this part is to provide standards for the location, design,
installation, use, and maintenance of alternative and experimental sewage treatment
systems. Alternative systems must meet the requirements listed below and can only be
used when a standard system cannot be installed or is not the most suitable treatment.
They may be employed provided:
(a) reasonable assurance of performance of the system is presented to the permitting
authority;
(b) the engineering design of the system is first approved by the permitting authority;
(c) there is no discharge to the ground surface or to surface waters. Systems
designed with a ground surface or surface water discharge are not covered under this
chapter and must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit or
state disposal system permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency;
(d) a three -foot minimum separation is provided between the bottom of the
distribution medium and the saturated soil or bedrock;
(e) treatment and disposal of wastes is completed in a manner that protects the
public health and general welfare;
(f) the system meets all local codes and ordinances and is subject to periodic
inspections by the permitting authority to assure adherence to specifications;
43
(g) provide a mitigative plan to the permitting authority, indicating what will be done if
the system fails to provide treatment and disposal; and
(h) provide a water meter (located down flow of any outside sill cocks) to verify water
use.
9 -955 Floodplain Areas,
9- 95.5(a) There shall be no pipe or other installed opening between the distribution medium
and the soil surface.
9- 955(b) Trench systems shall be located on the highest feasible area of the lot and shall
have location preference over all other improvements except the water supply well. The
bottom of the distribution medium shall be at least as high as the elevation of the ten -yeas
flood. The sewage tank may be located so as to provide gravity flow to the trenches.
9- 955(c) If a lift station is used to move effluent from the sewage tank to the trenches,
provisions shall be made to prevent the pump from operating when inundated with
floodwaters.
9- 955(d) When it is necessary to raise the elevation of the soil treatment area a mound
system as specified in .Section 9- 953(d)(20), may be used with the following additional
requirement: In no case shall the sand base fill for the mound exceed 48 inches below the
rock bed. The elevation of the mound shall be such that the elevation of the bottom of the
rock bed shall be at least one -half foot above the ten -year flood elevation. Inspection pipes
shall not be installed unless the top of the mound is above the elevation of the regional
flood.
9- 955(e) When the top of a sewage tank is inundated, the dwelling must cease discharging
sewage into it. This may be accomplished by either temporarily evacuating the structure
until the system again becomes functional, or by diverting the sewage into a holding tank as
follows:
If a holding tank is used for a dwelling, its liquid capacity shall equal 100 gallons times the
number of bedrooms times the number of days between the ten -year stage on the rising limb
of the regional flood hydrograph and the ten -year stage on the falling limb of the hydrograph,
or 1,000 gallons, whichever is greater. For other establishments, storage equal to at least
five times the average design flow must be provided. The holding tank must be accessible
for removal of tank contents under flooded conditions.
9 -955(fl The building sewer shall be designed to prevent backflow of liquid into the building
when the system is inundated. If a holding tank is used, the building sewer shall be
designed to permit rapid diversion of sewage into the holding tank when the system is
inundated.
44
9- 955(g) Whenever the water level has reached a stage above the top of a sewage tank, the
tank shall be pumped to remove all solids and liquids after the flood has receded before use
of the system is resumed.
9 -956 Greywater system. A toilet waste treatment device shall be used in conjunction with
a greywater system. In all cases, only toilet wastes shall be discharged to toilet waste
treatment devices. Greywater or garbage shall not be discharged to the device except as
specifically recommended by a manufacturer.
9- 956(a) Plumbing. The drainage system in new dwellings or other establishments shall be
based on a pipe diameter of two inches to prevent installation of a water flush toilet. There
shall be no openings or connections to the drainage system, including floor drains larger
g Y 9 � g
than two inches in diameter. For repair or replacement of an existing system, the existing
drainage system may be used.
9- 956(b) Building sewer. The building sewer shall meet all requirements of Section 9-
953(13)(1) except that the building sewer for a greywater system shall be no greater than
two inches in diameter.
9- 956(d) Sewage tank. Greywater septic tanks shall meet all requirements of Section 9-
953(d)(13). The soil treatment area shall be 60 percent of the amount calculated in Table III
in Section 9- 953(d)(20)., The septic tank for a greywater system shall be a single tank in
accordance with the first tank shown in Section 9- 953(d)(14)(A).
9- 956(d) Final treatment of greywater shall meet all requirements of Section
9- 953(d)(20).
9 -957 Other toilet waste treatment devices.
Other toilet waste treatment devices may be used where reasonable assurance of
performance is provided.
All devices shall be vented.
All electric, gas, and water connections shall conform to all local ordinances and codes.
Operation and maintenance shall follow the manufacturer's recommendations.
9 -958 Collector Systems.
9- 958(a) Where site and soil conditions do not provide suitable conditions forfinal treatment
and disposal on an individual lot, a soil treatment system located on another lot or lots may
be employed where approved by the city council.
45
9- 958(b)- Collector systems shall be designed by a registered Professional Engineer,
licensed in the State of Minnesota, and certified by the MPCA as competent in the field of
on -site system design.
9- 958(c) Hydro- geologic Study - due to the effect large flows have on groundwater quality
and groundwater mounding, a hydrologist shall determine site suitability based on the
following issues:
(1) Identify the depth to the static groundwater level and any perched water or areas
likely to be seasonally saturated.
(2) Identify depth to bedrock.
(3) Identify the proposed depth of the distribution medium.
(4) Determine the direction of groundwater flow (both horizontally and vertically).
(5) Determine background groundwater quality at the location.
(6) Estimate the height of groundwater mounding from the proposed system to confirm
adequate vertical separation.
(7) Determine whether drinking water standards can be met at the property boundary.
(8) Estimate the impact of water quality on existing or future downstream wells.
Depending on this estimate, piezometer and or monitor wells may be required.
EXCEPTION:
Systems designed for 1,200 gallons per day or less do not require a hydro geologic
study, or a design by a registered professional engineer.
9- 958(d) Application to the department shall be accompanied by the hydro - geologic study
and engineering drawings and specifications and shall demonstrate compliance with the
Zoning Ordinance, Plumbing Code and issues relating to joint ownership of land, joint
system maintenance responsibilities, homeowners associations, easements, covenants and
such other items as may apply, to the specific proposal.
9- 958(e) Design.
(1) The sum of a common soil treatment system shall be based on the sum of the areas
required for each dwelling unit or establishment being served.
(2) The system shall be designed with each residence having a sewage tank or with a
common sewage tank. The tank shall be sized according to Section 9- 953(d)(13).
46
(3) Sewer systems shall be designed on an estimated average daily flow for dwellings
based on Table II, set forth in part 9- 953(d)(20), plus estimated flows from other
establishments.
(4) The sewer for systems with common sewage tanks shall be so constructed to give
mean velocities, when flowing full, of not less than two feet per second. The sewer
for systems with individual sewage tanks shall be so constructed and designed to
hydraulically conduct the flow for which they were designed. In no case shall a
gravity sewer be less than four inches in diameter. The diameter and grade line
should be based on a flow equal to 50 percent ofthe average design flow occurringin
a one -hour period.
(5) Flows shall be increased to allow for 200 gallons of infiltration per inch of pipe
diameter per mile per day.
(6) Cleanouts, brought flush with or above finished grade, shall be provided wherever a
common sewer joins an individual building sewer or piping from an individual sewer
tank, or every 100 feet, whichever is less, unless manhole access is provided.
(7) There shall be no physical connection between sewers and water supply systems.
Sewers shall be set back from water supply systems and piping as required for
building sewers. Where it is not possible to obtain proper separation distances, the
sewer connections shall be watertight and pressure tested.
(8) Pipes, pipe points and pump stations shall be watertight.
(9) Pump stations shall have manholes flush with or above finished grade for cleaning
and maintenance.
(10) Manhole covers shall be so constructed as to prevent unauthorized entry.
(11) Pumps and lift stations shall be sized to handle 50 percent of the average design flow
in a one -hour period. Common pump tanks shall have a pump out capacity of ten
percent of average design flow and two alternating pumps.
(12) An alarm system shall be provided for all pumping stations to warn of pump failure,
overflow, or other malfunction.
(13) For systems with individual septic tanks, a stilling tank of at least 1,500 gallons liquid
capacity or ten percent of the average design flow, whichever is greater, should be
provided before the soil treatment system.
(14) Maintenance. All persons using a common drain field system shall assure, by
contract with maintenance personnel or other equivalent means, that the system will
be adequately maintained throughout its useful life. The system so maintained
includes, but is not limited to, common drain fields, common sewage tanks, common
47
pumps, common pump stations, common sewers, and all individual tanks connected
to the common system.
9 -959 Sewage Holding Tanks. Sewage holding tanks may be considered for installation
on previously developed sites, as a temporary method for periods of up to. one (1) year,
during which time measures are being taken to provide municipal sewer service or the
installation of an approved system as provided in this ordinance.
Holding tanks may be considered on a permanent basis for nonresidential, low water use
establishments generating less than one hundred fifty (150) gallons per day of waste,
subject to approval by the department and the issuance of a certificate of compliance.
Holding tanks may also be considered for floor drains for vehicle parking areas, and existing
facilities potentially generating a hazardous waste.
(a) Design and installation.
(1) Asewage - holding tank shall be constructed and installed as specified in
this Ordinance for sewage tanks.
(2) Holding tanks shall be located as required for sewage tanks, as in Section
9- 953(d) Table IV, and at locations readily accessible by normal pumping
equipment under all weather conditions.
(3) Holding tanks shall be provided with aclean -out pipe of six (6) inch
minimum diameter extending to or above the ground surface, capped or
sealed to prevent odors and inflow of surface water..
(4) Holding tanks shall be provided with a manhole of twenty (20) inch
minimum least dimension to within a minimum of six (6) inches below
finished grade. Covers shall be secured to prevent unauthorized entry.
(5) When installed in .areas of high ground. water, within six (6) feet of the
ground surface, holding tanks shall be installed entirely above the ground
water level or shall be installed according to an engineer's design to prevent
flotation.
(b) Capacity.
(1) Sewage holding tanks shall have a minimum capacity of one thousand two
hundred (1,200) gallons or four hundred (400) gallons times the number of
bedrooms for a dwelling unit, whichever is greater.
(2) For other establishments, capacity shall be based on measured or
estimated flow rates. Minimum capacity shall be equal to at least eight (8)
times the daily flow rate.
48
(3) Water use metering shall be required for each dwelling unit or other
establishment served by a holding tank.
(c) Service and maintenance.
(�) Where holding tanks are installed, the owner shall provide and maintain a
contract with a licensed pumper, providing for regular pumping of the tank.
(2) Records of pumping data, to include dates, quantities and septage disposal
location, shall be maintained by the pumping contractor and reported
quarterly to the permitting authority.
(3) Holding tanks shall be provided with alarm or warning devices that will
activate a signal when the tank reaches seventy -five (75) percent of its
capacity.
(4) The permitting authority shall be provided right of access to perform
periodic maintenance and operational inspections of the system.
9 -960 Experimental Systems, Systems utilizing innovative techniques or methods may be
considered for new or existing development under the following conditions:
(a) Reasonable assurance of performance of the system is presented to the
permitting authority.
(b) System being proposed is substantiated by engineering data and approved by
the permitting authority.
(c) System is in compliance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency rules.
(d) Adequate area for long -term sewage treatment by suitable soils as required for
standard systems is identified and reserved on the site.
(e) Performance monitoring of the system, including but not limited to water use
metering, effluent quality and system maintenance are provided.
(f) Failure of experimental system to function, or to properly treat sewage to a
standard - equivalent to a standard drain field system will require discontinuation of
use until reasonable modifications can be made or the system is replaced with a
standard system.
(g) A mitigative plan must be provided to deal with possible system failure. It must
include the planned corrections and /or replacement, as well as a clear agreement
signed by all parties clarifying who will pay for the mitigation.
49
SECTION 9 -962. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
9 -961 General Requirements. Each individual on -site sewage treatment system currently
existing as well as those installed under this ordinance shall be operated and maintained
according to the provisions of this section.
9- 961(a) Maintenance of Septic Tanks.
(1) The owner of any septic tank or the owner's agent shall regularly, but in no case
g
less frequently than every three years, have the tank or tanks pumped. As an
alternative, the owner may have the tank or tanks professionally inspected to
measure the accumulations of sludge, which includes the settled materials at the
bottom of the tank, and the accumulations of scum, which includes grease and
other floating materials at the top of the tank. The owner of any septic tank or the
owner's agent must arrange for the removal and sanitary disposal of septage from
the tank whenever the top of the sludge -layer is less than 12 inches below the
bottom of the outlet baffle or whenever the bottom of the scum layer is less than
three inches above the bottom of the outlet baffle. Removal of septage shall
include complete removal of scum and sludge. If the inspector determines that
pumping the tank or tanks is not necessary, then the inspector shall prepare
documentation as to the condition of the tank(s) and submit the report to the city.
(2) The owner or the owner's agent shall install access to the septic tanks in
accordance with Section 9- 953(d)(13) to allow for proper maintenance.
(3) Individual sewage treatment system additives, which contain hazardous
materials, must not be used in individual sewage treatment systems in
Minnesota.
(4) Individual sewage treatment system additives must not be used as a means to
reduce the frequency of proper maintenance and removal of septage from the
septic tank as specified in item (1).
9- 961(b) Maintenance of System Components. Whenever inspection of pump
stations, distribution devices, valve or drop boxes indicates the accumulation of solids, such
device shall be promptly cleaned.
9- 961(c) Activities on the Soil Treatment Area. Activities on the soil treatment area or the
alternate soil treatment area that may impair the treatment abilities or hydraulic performance
of the soil treatment system are prohibited.
(1) Any maintenance activity used to increase the acceptance of effluent to a soil
treatment system must:
(A) not be used on failing systems;
50
(B) not decrease the separation to the saturated soil or bedrock;
(C) not cause preferential flow from the system bottom to
the saturated soil or bedrock; and
(D) be conducted by a qualified employee or under an
installer license.
9- 961(d) Disposal of Septage. Septage shall be disposed of only by approved means as
follows:
(1) Septage shall be disposed in accordance with all state and federal
requirements.
(2) Septage must be disposed into a municipal treatment system.
SECTION 9 -962. ADMINISTRATION
9- 962(a) Applicability. The ordinance shall apply and be in effect for the stated
purposes for the City of Maplewood.
9- 962(b) Enforcement.
(1) The City of Maplewood shall be responsible for administration and
enforcement of this ordinance.
(2) The department or its agent shall be qualified and certified by the MPCA as
competent in the design, evaluation and inspection of individual on -site
sewage treatment systems.
(3) If the Department finds that by reason of exceptional circumstances the
strict enforcement of any provisions of this ordinance would cause undue
hardship or that strict conformity with the standards would be unreasonable,
impractical, or not feasible under the circumstances, the Department in its
discretion may permit modifications in individual cases upon conditions as it
may prescribe for prevention, control, or abatement of pollution in harmony
with the general purpose of these standards and the intent of applicable
state and federal laws. In no case will the 36 -inch separation requirement
be compromised.
9- 962(c) Board of Adjustment and Appeals.
(1) The Maplewood City Council shall hear and decide appeals and review any
order, decision or determination made by the department about the
enforcement of this ordinance.
51
(2) An appeal of an administrative decision or determination may be filed by
any person, department, bureau, city, county, or state.
9- 962(d) Permits Required. Permits shall be required for sewage treatment system
as follows
(1) All new installations of sewage tanks, treatment systems and components
thereof.
(2) All repair, extension, replacement or modification of existing systems and
components.
(3) Any change in use of a facility served by an existing sewage treatment
system.
(4) Permits shall not be required for normal routine inspection and
maintenance of systems.
(5) No building permit shall be issued for any new construction until the permit
required for the treatment system has first been issued.
(6) No building permit shall be issued for remodeling involving 50 percent or
more of the structure, or alterations that would affect the water use, such as
bedrooms, bathrooms, or additions to living space (excluding such things as
screen porches, entryways, decks, attics, patios, uninhabitable storage
) , etc.
space, until the treatments Y stem has been determined to be both
p
adequate and conforming, or the city has first issued a permit for a new
treatment system.
(7) Where work requiring a permit under this ordinance has been commenced
without first having obtained a permit, work shall be ordered to stop until the
permit requirement has been satisfied.
9- 962(e) Inspections Required. Inspection as required determining compliance
with this ordinance shall be performed by the department or its authorized
agent under the following circumstances:
(1) Site inspections to verify and evaluate soil and site conditions and to
determine suitability of soils and system design.
(2) Necessary investigation to determine compliance of existing systems at the
time of remodeling, alteration, or additions.
(3) Installation inspections shall be made at each installation, prior to any work
having been covered by backfill.
52
(A) The licensed installer shall be responsible to notify the department a
minimum of twenty -four (24) hours before the time the work is ready
for inspection or reinspection.
(B) Work that is backfilled prior to required inspection may be ordered to
be uncovered whenever necessary to determine compliance.
(C) When, upon inspection, any part of the system is determined not to
be in compliance with this ordinance, written notice shall be provided
by the department indicating the deficiency and the required
corrections.
(D) Noted deficiencies shall be properly corrected and reinspected
before any other work on the project is continued.
(E) No system .shall be placed or replaced in service until final
inspection and approval of the installation.
(F) Contractor, upon completion of installation, shall file with the
department, as -built drawings indicating the location of system
components dimensioned from a permanent reference point.
(4) Mounds - A minimum of three construction inspections are required:
(A) When the original soil under the mound has been roughened, but
prior to placement of the sand fill. Enough of the proposed sand fill
must be present to be viewed.
(B) After placement of rock and piping but prior to cover.
(C) Final inspection, when job is completed.
(5) The owner or occupant of a property shall be responsible to provide access
at reasonable times, to the department or its agent, for the purpose of
performing inspections required under this ordinance.
(6) To enforce this ordinance the department may enter a building, property, or
a place where there is reason to suspect a system is failing to properly treat
or dispose of sewage.
(7) Fees for inspections, reinspections, or other services rendered under this
ordinance shall be as set by resolution of the Maplewood City Council from
time to time.
SECTION 9 -963. LICENSING AND PERMITS
53
9- 963(a) Licensing. All persons, firms, or corporations proposing to engage in the
business of installation, constructing, pumping, soil testing, designing, or providing private
inspection or maintenance services for on -site sewage treatment systems shall be registered
and licensed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
9- 963(b) Permits. No person, firm, or corporation shall install, alter, repair or extend
any individual sewage treatment system in the City of Maplewood without first having
obtained a permit, from the department for the specific work, and having paid the fee
prescribed for such permit as determined from time to time by the Maplewood City Council.
9- 963(c) Permit Application. Permit application shall be made in writing upon forms
provided by the department and shall contain data including, but not limited to the following:
(1) The correct address and legal description of the property where the
proposed work is to take place.
(2) Site plan, drawn to scale, showing the location of all proposed and existing
structures, property lines, water supply wells within 100 feet, terrain
features such as bluff lines, water bodies or water ways, buried utilities,
easements and other unique features of the site.
(3) Soil test data, including soil boring logs, percolation test data with field
notes, and the location and identification of test area.
(4) Plans and details of the proposed installation of work, including engineering
data and final design.
(5) In certain cases, a survey may be required showing all the above
information including such things as elevations, contour lines, normal high
water marks, and ten (10) year and one hundred (100) year flood
elevations.
(6) Building plans showing existing and proposed room arrangement and uses.
(7) For other than dwellings, calculated or measured water use rates
occupancy and occupant load.
(8) Evidence of compliance with state or other jurisdiction regulations where
applicable.
9- 963(d) Term of Permit. Permits shall be valid upon issuance, for a period of one
(1) year and may be renewed, when no changes are proposed, upon application for renewal
and payment of the fee prescribed.
54
9- 963(e) Permit Revocation. Permits issued under this ordinance may be revoked
upon written notice of the department when such permit has been issued based upon
erroneous or inaccurate application data.
SECTION 9 -964. ENFORCEMENT
9- 964(a) Violations and Penalties. It is hereby declared unlawful for any person,
firm or corporation to violate any term or provision of this ordinance. Violation thereof shall
be a misdemeanor. Each day that a violation is allowed to continue shall constitute a
separate offense.
9- 964(b) Enforcement. In the event of a violation or a threatened violation of this
ordinance, the department, in addition to other remedies, may request appropriate actions or
proceedings to prevent, restrain, correct, or abate such violations or threatened violations.
In addition, written notice in the form of a license complaint may be made to the
Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). If there is known
contamination of ground water, the city also may notify the Minnesota Department of Health
for a possible well advisory.
9- 964(c) Public Health Act. In cases where a public health nuisance has been
determined to exist the Department may institute enforcement action under the Public
Health Act Section 145A.
SECTION 9 -965. EFFECTUATION
9- 966(a) Separability. It is hereby declared to be the intent that the several
provisions of this ordinance are separable in accordance with the following:
(1) If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision of this
ordinance to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provisions
of this ordinance not specifically included in said judgment.
(2) If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge invalid the application of
any portion of this ordinance to a particular property, building or other
structure, such judgment shall not affect the application of said provision to
any other property, building, or structure not specifically included in said
judgment.
55
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on . , 2002.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective on June 1, 2002. An official copy of
this ordinance is on file in the office of the Maplewood City Clerk,
, Maplewood, Minnesota.
Mayor
ATTEST:-
City Clerk
AYES
NAYS --
56
AGENDA nSM NO�
Actions by Coumil
M0
Date
Endorsed swam
To: Patt Fry, City Clerk's Office Modified - --
From: Deputy Chief David Thomalla Rejected
p Y
Subject: Application for Permit - Currency Exchange Business
Date: January 14, 2002
The background check for Michael and Suzanne Schroeder and Cashway Checking LLC has been
completed for the purpose of operating a currency exchange in the City of Maplewood. Nothing
has been identified in the background investigation which would prohibit them from holding this
license.
MEMORANDUM
Application for License - 2002
E
>
:.f „ > ✓' n rya ,�•K!' t, ......,:., r y , l e1r,v • s . � r r� <� < (� „2 �d(Y� . . .
7 5 7 Gl�.....
`i""z'A . � 4 �ry�,k . . City of Maplewood - 18 East Count Road B - Maplewood, Y p , MN 55109
CURRENCY EXCHANGE
Fee: $300.00
License year: January 1 through December 31
' Applicant Information (Individual who executes and signs this application - no •
g pp t the name of a company, corporation, etc.
Name of Applicant ! CA ,+6 L 75 ;z � d �
Home Address 8 e_r!a A4/J
SS
Telephone: Home g5al 0 2. -d z -2. Work 3 - •
- � 710 ) 53'7 4�� dy Da te of Birth 2 — / z
Owner Information (If owner is a corporation, please list the registered Minnesota address.
Name of Owne
Address of Owner E AW0
Telephone: Home ( } .,IA E A byt Work & ;�&,, .Date of Birth Z a
I � �Z may.
Business Information
Name of Business h6C
r Y CJ
Address. of Business Lu t I16'C40 CAq:51W
s Phone -' � � ... ` , ; ...:.. Aft
'7� 3 :t --�-• �Dd . er
Business- Hours
Type of Services Provide Ey C•. " 4e,. v t ;�
c es ! C1 u�� 561.4,
*prow. 0" F90. 144
&t) Wit ;,J sreu � r
9 1 - P" 962LY od
Agenda
MEMORANDUM
Action by Com
TO: Richard Fursman, City Ma r r
Date
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Directo o P r d ecreation d °r'�
Modified
DATE: January 10, 2002 for the Ja uary 8, 0 City Council Meeting Rejected
SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Property
INTRODUCTION
The city has received notice that a tax forfeit parcel located at Lakewood Drive north of Brenwood
Circle has been declared a tax forfeited property. There are two parcels totaling .36 acre of land.
The parcels are highlighted in green and pink and a value of $6,300 has been determined. The
property abuts a small, 1.13 acre parcel of park and /or open space.
BACKGROUND
City staff has been reviewing this parcel with Ramsey County Department of Property Records for
the past four months. The tax forfeited parcel identified as PIN 01- 29 -22 -22 -0020 is currently
unbuildable due to lack of minimum footage. We have received a request to sell a portion of city
park land on Lakewood Drive North to create a buildable lot.
I have had the opportunity to meet with three of the abutting property owners and it appears that the
parcel has public benefit as it creates a trail corridor between Lakewood Drive North, Gall Avenue
and ultimately, Lydia Avenue to Maplecrest Park.
Staff recommends that the city acquire the .36 -acre parcel for the appraised value of $6,300 plus
applicable fees and costs. The money to acquire the property would be allocated from the park
dedication fund.
It is not intended that this parcel be developed in the immediate future, but remain in public
ownership.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the city acquire tax forfeit parcel PIN 01- 29 -22 -22 -0020 at the appraised
value of $6,300 plus applicable fees and costs with the understanding that the city attorney will
coordinate the legal issues to acquire the property.
kdVaA t.mem
M &
wannsEY counrnr �
Property Record's and Revenue
Richard J. Wendt, Division Manager
620B Government Center West
50 West Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul, MN 55102.1557
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
Bruce Anderson,
Fax: 651- 266 -2210
January 7, 2002
:x?? ., w .'r�'c.:: ":x r.. �xu� .�f;?ycx,�;xs: xrrH� � • :::o . , rar :sarax:::{ n $. � � - ic�r. o ti , yr , „ „� - ::
.+.. Sa ;+- °`rXSA. .n. v. 4)JD S.S�h:o,;h;, RC:�^.,.:.,Yh'a \.,. ;xy.. :..
��" � r. � :.�•, ,}:�, r h 'e• �• $•.::+..• , },• . ,.. }} , .,, ,.� �,. ,• zr?7�"' ^ ?uf'�. ..crc.. '�.. ..z... ..?E2�?�%xs:E . .. �...., c{? L� '.'.s: }�z:;�zc:?7*.0. <., s :: }'�riz�.;.ssx%Cx'R:?:�zxs}�•� x•:s avcsr �
•: '�'k ./ ./�,, } ,x. /< ..,., .2} t . f,. �, � .. .. '- .. -•:: •r:. .. �: ::.. . <,�'2i aJ... �i ..Y�..•' :`Fi$• :: 'D
�' f.. +/. ,:Sv +,. r , » }n.. .}.• h., �s .;%: ' }•'' .A:. T$ . < - ::.r•: - ;i%°� }..
� �. .. , .: �. , .. 1 . A .... .. ... ..: hx. f. v:. r f :.. .; . -• $ x �S: .f`iS :: .,xN/. X:.
. h.
v
9{ ..,. .:. ,.. ..... .... ..... ... ����. .�T .. .:.... ...... .. :.. ..: .. ....,. .:., •.. :. ::::.. ;r .. .. ... :,•.• x Z..�.� • ;'.'•;:'S:^•:,.$<.:� ..k ; +fi
.. ... 7tv,' :Cbb6f�c'&td�Xo�:} ............. ... ... ....:... ... .. ::.. .�. .....� - ��x�vt4ia�frfo7 •N'N:c$.`^^.C�''•�Ttc''`y�3'�
After a field review by the Ramsey County Tax Forfeited Lands Section, it was discovered that a
0.36 acre tax forfeited parcel (PIN 01- 29- 22 -22- 0020), Fisted as Unassigned, Lakewood Drive
adjacent to your property, was determined by the City of Maplewood to be unbuildable due to
minimum front footage.
Due to it being unbuild.able we have decided to reappraise the parcel as two separate parcels
and as a whole and reoffer both purchase options to the adjacent landowners. As illustrated on
the attached map; the parcel highlighted in pink is appraised for $5,300, plus applicable fees
and costs, and the parcel highlighted in green is appraised for $1,300, plus applicable fees and
costs. Both parcels together are appraised for $6,300, plus pp a licable fees and costs.
One of the main objectives of this department is to return these parcels of land to the tax rolls b
offering them for public auction or selling directly to an adjacent landowner if certain criteria are
met. Pursuant to MN Statutes, section 282.01, subd. 7a, these p arcels meets the minimum
requirements for a private sale due to non- compliance with local ordinances regarding minimum
area, shape, frontage or access, and will promote its return to the tax rolls.
If you are interested in purchasing either of these parcels separately or as a whole please
contact me within no later than Monday, February 4, 2002. If ou have additional questions
Y q
please call me between 8:00 a.m. 4:00 p.m. Monday- Friday at (651) 266 -2047 or write
Ramsey County, Tax Forfeited Lands Section at 50 Kellogg Blvd West, Suite 620, St. Paul MN
55102.
Sin erely, '-
Ka hleen Smith roperty Manager
Ramsey County - Tax Forfeited Lands
50 Kellogg Blvd. West, Suite 620B
St. Paul, MN 55102 -1557
(651) 266 -2047 or general phone (651) 266 -2047
(enclosures)
Minnesota's First Home Rule County
printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post - consumer content
AFSCME
IAV 4Y.
NORTH
` � s � r f T,O -1 r
WEST.'QU 1--RT'ER*
F 2 9 N S
1
� 2 04WA i --
33 ¢� soi Ts �' - 33 .4 - _�Q t .__ .... _ 2
ia . r
. 0
�00
Pot) j r4 - 4-
�-
in
lq 3 4 Z
wo
R.' T L N
pi A
M D. ° H G S
7f 6
. - �� - �.� `" o _ 1 I a i 2 (�o� _ ---
(=177, 5 p -
T
4 X13 ~ a ° (0 � ,3z� to ro v ��.,� 13 C8 /) -��. c, c
IA
5 (g 5) `J' 4s +) C�� Z - �. °1 1 4 ` b 15 e -t 4 >> Tf, f
'P L .Sj �6 6) �9 3� ti W : �'', eti- .� ,
.9 N 8 . o. n (�Z� (� ate) (� os) �• o s►
I&- G �fl
� � S R a M � . 6 5 ° '� '` t �� 3)
- - - -- _ _ _ Es � >� � C - (�-a) ,(73) r4 � « 2
4
r4(
I 0 3 ' O° 90 3v 8 9 O� Tf • _ - _ .` _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ Go S 73• S ROB R 1 L S N P. oso . M � V E; 4
' 3)
1. 7 �.�Coac t + ) '��• 40 �o o 60 a 141 MAP L WOOD N 6 T I 0 , 3 c, ' ds (�3 ��a) (e {ems) 4 9� x`90 ( 9t ) 3)
co ?_ '4 3
CIA 'm
4 6' 7 8 9 10 11
n �t- D R A I NA E , i 13
AP' 0 pft 16 87--46 t
Sin
-- w _ _
.---- ♦
• _ �o• s- �, , 4 ,,4 ` N _ _ AAA co ! L� C t ..__ �I P L I N
N �. r &0
i O 10 ( 5 411. S T N h X30 G t l �12•t t7. as
CP (5; 1)
M
.. i • 1
X0 1 t 5._ �►� l 6. , 1.�ac
t t 1 j ($�}• j s ,`�r ,fit .a: ,� �- �'► S �► �, � -7 a o
(Z-)
�• 3) ,� - tom) � (11)
11 r �S rf 4 11 u f� 3 7 ( 9 � • (� ___..1..
j 4) ��. �. 1 EAST
' I r . 10�
� der
F . y
to 4? o , ` ,s 0 .
24
14 d pad �) . �c /., o c F.;7
5
07) C.
x 1 03
IfA
Tv as
15 o } t 4*4 � � z , . � - _ • . � .� it
r 7 i 0• �.' ?�' �. t ' 7 4 i ,� / P r:ycir' -:1, L _j (14
F_
0 (K 13.1
WOW 0 o
-�
(arc A 447,�
q 3
17 �
~
AJI
►
010 &4/
TC 9 0 6B 10 T62 ACS Tax System
Inquiry
Bill No.
Parcel No.
Name Parcel
Values
,A ,0,1 . 2,9, . 2,2, . ,2,2, • ,0,0,2,0, , , , ,
MP#
, , , , , , , , , ,S,TAT,E, ,O,F NN, TRUST, E,
Rate 117.0570 MvR
.22045
Ins St
S R
EdA H 23.01600 N 20.71440 EdR
27.29040
* - - -- Values
/Acres - - - -* * NET Tax
Capacities -* * Tax /Credits /SpAsmts
-* S
EMV Land
26300 TOT TMV
26300 GT LEV
Total EMV
26300
NET TX
NET +SA
- Classification 960 TRUST EXEMPT
Homestead 0 NON- HOMESTEAD
Choice ,& Pct 099
*2001 CERT PROPERTY TAX* Rec# 1 of 1
A =CSM B =ASM C =DQ D =NAL E =TR F =SP P= PAS =GS U =CAMA Mod? Action?
TC906D 30 T62 ACS Tax System
Bill No. Parcel No.
R R 01.29.22.22.0020
2001
Book/Page EX N 21T FT OF W 150 FT &
/ EX PART IN ROBERT TILSEN'S
MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS NO. 9;
THE E 170 FT OF S 1103.69
FT OF NW1 /4 OF NW1 /4
( TO RDS & ESMTS) IN
SEC 1 TN 29 RN 22
Inquiry
Name Additional Legal Lines
STATE OF MN TRUST EXEMPT 0
Action?
TC906S 10 T62 ACS
Tax System
, Parcel No.
Year
In it
�,, ,
,A O1 , d 2 9.22.22.0020
, , , ,,
M P #
General
Prompt
Taxpayer 23
, , , , , , , , , ,
Calc thru
,2,0,0,1,
,0,1,0,4,2,0,0,2,
Total: EMV
LMV Deeded Acres
,S,TATE, ,O,F, ,T�US,T,
50 KELLOGG BLVD W
E,XEPT
26 ,300
26
. 3 6
ST PAUL
Alternate
MN 55102 - 1557
Dist 5726 SD 0622
Plat SECTION 1 TOWN
Bk pg
29 RANGE
22
Sec Twn Rn Lot
Block
Escrow
01 029 022
EX N 217 FT OF W
150 FT &
Prop Addr
EX PART IN ROBERT
TILSEN' S
DR N
Class 960
� 1
0 1
l
- LAKEWOOD
MAPLEWOOD
55109
Hmst De Status
-
NON H S TD
Net Tax
Original
Abat /Addn Collections
dons
Balance
Special Asmts
Total before P &I
Penalty
Interest
Fees
* * TOTALS
*2001 CERT PROPERTY'TAX* Notice
Proposed
p
Scr ee.n .
NO BILL A
# ASSIGNED
Mod. Action.
AOENDA MEM NO, 1
s
t by Council
Date
MEMORANDUM
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
TO: City Manager
FROM: Melinda Coleman, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Metropolitan Council - Riverview Corridor Appointments
DATE: January 18, 2002
INFORMATION
The Metropolitan Council recently approved a plan that will provide express bus service
from the Maplewood Mall to the airport and the Mall of America. The Metropolitan
Council is seeking input from residents, staff and city council to help in the planning and
implementation of this new service. A letter from Ted Mondale, Metropolitan Council
Chair is attached.
The letter indicates that the Council is looking for 4 representatives: 2 to serve on the
Corridor Management Committee, one from city council and a city staff member and 2 to
serve on the Citizens Workgroup, one resident and one business owner. Staff has
recruited from within the community and have two residents who have expressed interest
in serving on the committee. Jack Frost would like to be the citizen representative and
Duane Simpson, owner of Wondermat Cleaners at 1698 White Bear Avenue is interested
in representing business owners.
In addition to those two appointments, City Council needs to select a council
representative and a staff appointment. Chuck Ahl has indicated that he is willing to
serve on the Corridor Management Committee. This committee meets monthly on the
second Friday at 9- 11 am. It is anticipated that this committee will meet throughtout the
year 2002.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that you select a council - member who is interested and able to serve
on this committee as well as appoint Chuck Ahl as city representative. In addition it is
recommended that Jack Frost and Duane Simpson be appointed to serve on the Citizens
Workgroup.
Metropolitan Council
Building communities that work
December 12, 2001
Richard Fursman, City Manager
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Fursman:
As you know, the Metropolitan Council recently approved 'a plan to imp rove sig nificantly transit
p g y sit
services throughout the Riverview Corridor, as well as support regional connections, between
reside tY l w d ? y '�vn ar s. AS i - i uii v�i�e the 1 ' vet vi iv ' f o� ' dor � +� e
ext�,nded tF om h
Mall of America to the Arcade area of St. Paul. Significant work b a Citizens Work rou
Y g p (CW) and
a Corridor Management Committee (CMC), along with input from local citizens and businesses
concluded that the corridor would be further enhanced by following a route that extends as far a
g s
Maplewood Mall.
The Corridor now generally follows 7 Street through the southwest ortion of St. Paul thro
5 th and t th to Johnson, Pros p ) ugh
downtown on 5 and 6 Streets, East 7 Prosperity and Maryland to White Bear
p Y � Avenue
(closely approximating the planned Phalen Corridor) and finally u p to`Ma p lewood Mall.
The Metropolitan Council formed a Corridor Management Committee to rovide oversight
p g
throughout the study, planning and implementation phases of this new transit corridor. The
Council
also created a Citizens Workgroup to provide input on the project. The purpose and composition
J p rp of
both committees as approved by the Council are outlined in the attachment.
By action of the Metropolitan Council, the Maplewood City Coun p ty 1 i entitled to appoint one of its
members to the Corridor Management Committee to represent the City f Maplewood. The
Y p c ity
Council is also asked to appoint 2 members to the Citizens Workgroup — 1 to represent the g p p interest of
citizens and 1 member representing the interests of business.
The Citizens Workgroup meets the third Monday of the month from 7 to 9 .m. The CM C generally
meets month -� ; p
lv on the second r,dav of the month .frog_ 9 zL 11 a.m. It is e tPd th ko
1 V LI 'V t'x
committees will meet throughout 2002.
Please forward the names, addresses, phone and email addresses of our appointees to M
Y pp oily Grove,
Community Outreach Coordinator, at (612) 349 -7533, fax (612) 349 -7675 or
molly. grove metc.state.mn.us Please address any questions -you have to Ms. Grove.
Thank for your involvement in this important process.
. cer y
Ted Mondale
Chair
attachments
www.metrocouncil.org
Metro Info Line 602 -1888
230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 (651) 602 -1000 Fax 602 -1550 TTY 291 -0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
ATTACHMENT
Riverview Transit Corridor
Citizens Workgroup
Purpose
Serve as a community forum to discuss transit improvements along the Riverview Transit
Corridor and their environmental consequences.
Advise the Metropolitan Council transportation committee on community reaction to transit
development plans in the Riverview Transit Corridor..
Advise the Metropolitan Council. transportation committee on the impact of planned Riverview
transit enhancements, including such topics as right -of -way, alignment and station design.
Assess proposed transit improvements for their local and regional value in addressing mobility
and redevelopment potential.
Assist with public involvement efforts to ensure broad citizen participation.
Composition
Chair, Metropolitan Council member
12 District Council Appointments
Capitol River, Dist. 17
Dayton's Bluff, Dist. 4
Highland, Dist. 15
Payne Phalen, Dist. S
W. 7 Road, Dist. 9
Greater East Side, Dist. 2
St. Paul City Council Appointees
St. Paul 2, 3, 6 7
One member
One member plus one alternate each
One each
St. Paul City Council Appointees from key employers
Wards 2, 3, 6 7 One each
Maplewood City Council Appointee One member
Maplewood City Council - employer One member
Transit Users (appointed by Metro Transit) Two members
Transportation Accessibility Advisory Committee One member
■
St. Paul Planning Commission
Appointees by each Metro Council member
representing corridor
West End Business & Professional Assoc.
East Side Business Assoc.
White Bear Ave. Business Assoc.
Total: 29 members plus alternates.
Two members
One each (for total of 4)
One member
One member
One member
Riverview Transit Corridor
Management Committee (CMC)
Pu ose
Advise Metropolitan Council on transit issues having direct impact on residents, businesses and other
stakeholders along the Riverview corridor, including impact of alignment, station design and right-of-wa
g y
issues.
Assess proposed transit improvements for their local and regional value in addressing mobility and
redevelopment potential.
Provide feedback to the Metropolitan Council from the Riverview Corridor Citizens' Advisory
Committee and the Riverview Corridor Technical Committee, including concerns, complaints and
suggestions.
Take action to support or not support staff recommendations related to the Riverview Corridor project.
Composition — Elected and appointed officials:
Metropolitan Council
(Chair and one member)
Minnesota Department of Transportation
(member and alternate)
Ramsey County House delegation
(member and alternate)
Ramsey County Senate delegation
(member and alternate)
Metropolitan Airports Commission
(member and alternate)
Hennepin County
(member and alternate)
Ramsey County
(two members)
City of St. Paul
(two members)
St. Paul Port Authority
(member and alternate)
City of Maplewood
(two members)
Total 1.4 members -and :stn ..]tei`r1ateo.
1'
TO: Richard Fuxsman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
1
DATE: January 22, 2001
RE: 2002 City Council Appointments
Introduction
MEMORANDUM
AGENDA #
Action by Cow
Date_.....
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
At its first meeting of the year the Maplewood City Council officially makes the year's
appointments to organizations of which the City is a member and to those who serve at the
pleasure of the Council. The following appointment list, with incumbents and vacancies, is
provided to the City Council for consideration at its January 28, 2002 regular council meeting.
Appointment
2001
2002 Recommended
City Attorney
Patrick J. Kelly
Kelly &Fawcett
Current Rates:
$80/hr -civil
$95/hr - litigation
Patrick J. Kelly
Kelly & Fawcett
To be negotiated
Prosecuting Attorney Patrick J. Kelly Patrick J. Kelly
Kelly &Fawcett Kelly &Fawcett
Current Rates: To be negotiated
$ retainer
$ 500 /month cap on expenses
Official Newspaper
Maplewood Review Maplewood Review
Municipal Legislative Commission Sherry Allenspach
(quarterly, Wed - p.m.) City Manager
Ramsey County League Sherry Allenspach
of Local Governments Kenneth Collins
Ramsey/Washington
Marvin Koppen
Suburban Cable Commission
Robert Cardinal (alt)
N.E.S.T
Marvin Koppen
(first Thursday @ 7:30 p.m.)
Julie Wasiluk
Suburban Rate Authority
Marvin Koppen
(first month of quarter)
Melinda Coleman
St. Paul Water Utility
Robert Cardinal
Board of Commissioners
(second Monday @ 5:00 p.m.)
Suburban Area Chamber
Kenneth Collins
of Commerce
Melinda Coleman (alt)
The Partnership Julie Wasiluk
(Tuesday a.m.) Don Winger
Metro East Development Marvin Koppen
Partnership Melinda Coleman (alt)
Joint Ice Arena Board Sherry Allenspach
Kenneth Collins
Acting Mayor* Marvin Koppen
*Rotation of acting mayors: 1995 - Carlson, 1996 Allenspach, 1997 - Koppen, 1998- Rossbach,
1999 - Carlson, 2000 Allenspach, 2001 - Koppen
Attachment #1 Application for Appointment to Suburban Cable Commission
Attachment #2 Ramsey County Positions for Consideration
JAN-22-2002 09:04
V., i
*,.,
4
(L
R HIS.
IP
�ul
US
N�l
-7--410
C-
Q*
kl
Q%
UZ
C116
a U
C
0
c
0.
.c
L
% .?f
C 91
ILI
16-
F.
-b
E
E
CD
.0
FAC OPERAT I ONS/MTCE A ffilC #767 " 6512908362 P. 01/01
con
w
c l--
CL
z*
PC
LX
kA
E
Ij
4�
E 4z
r
4)
Z � : 4j o
Z
Le
4 Lv uj
EP - LU
(d = d
E
IT' A. cii
o
0
CL a. cb
0 L
-4
cc
Th. E
-All 4$
7p
m
< c m (M
. a d
X
0 1
r
X- qb
As --
ZL
a)
E
L4- IZLT-
al L u
4L Q
0
-Dr..
0 0 cop
'1—
-a 3 UA g e
17 W-
IC 1 ;5
0
CU
mob& Cc,
TOTAL P.
kAejol
4# J 4MA")7**1 2
A N i s 20
.Ramsey
AMSEY COUN Bonnie Jackelen, Chief Clerk
Ramsey County Board of Commissioners
15 W. Kellogg Blvd. #250 Telephone: (651) 266 -8014
St. Paul, M FAX: (651) 266 -8039
INDIVIDUALS SOUGHT FOR POSITIONS ON RAMSEY COUNTY COMMITTEES
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 14, 2002
The , Ramsey County Board of Commissioners is seeking individuals who are residents of, or who
work in Ramsey County; to serve on various volunteer committees and outside boards.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) COMMITTEE provides participation for the planning
process of the County's Capital Improvement Program. The members advise the County Board in
setting priorities on proposed capital expenditures within Ramsey County. Individuals are needed
for. two -year terms.
EXTENSION SERVICE members encourage individuals and Organizations to make the best use
of activities in the areas of agriculture, horticulture, home economics, 4 -H and related, subjects.
One individual is needed for a three -year term.
LIBRARY BOARD is responsible for governing the suburban library system with branches in
Roseville, Maplewood, Shoreview, White Bear Lake, Arden Hills, North St. Paul, and Mounds
View; assuring that the libraries. are responsive'to the needs of the community; assuring financial
resources to accomplish the strategic plan; and setting library policy. One individual is needed for
a three -year term. Applicants must be residents of suburban Ramsey County, with representation
especially needed from Arden Hills, Gem Lake, Mounds View, North Oaks, Vadnais Heights and
the Town of White Bear.
For an application(s) and more detailed information on these committees, call 651 -266-
8001.
RAMSEY COUNTY CHARTER COMMISSION — A vacancy currently exists on the Ramsey
County Charter Commission representing Commissioner District 6. This vacancy exists due to a
resignation and the term will be from the time of appointment to November 5, 2004. Please call
Linda Cox, Ramsey County District Court, at 651 - 266 -8253 to obtain an application. Please note:
This appointment is made by Ramsey County District Court, NOT the Ramsey County.
Board of Commissioners,
/4ff&J*eA!t)v
AGENDA #�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: January 22, 2001
RE: Adult Use Fee and Code Change
Introduction
,Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The City Clerk Department is responsible for issuing business licenses for the city. Chapter 17.4
of the City Code of Ordinances addresses types of businesses that are categorized as Adult Use.
In the past, there has been no application or investigative fee set for this type of business.
In addition to setting a fee, we propose that based on findings after a police investigation that
approval of the application be by the city manager or his designee and the requirement for a
public hearing be eliminated.
Recommendation
Approve an investigation and a license fee of $113 and $216 respectively.
Approve the following code change:
...the city shall investigate all facts set out in the application. After the city finishes its
investigation,
Vii
the city manager-e&wttil-shall grantor refuse the application.
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
Wei
FROM:
Richard Fursman, City Manager
R. Charles Ahl Director of Public Works /City Engineer
Action by CouncH
{
Date
Endorsed
Modified
. 'ected
SUBJECT: Lift Station Relocation At Maple Hills Development, Project 02 -A!
p p j
Resolution Accepting Petition and Authorizing Preliminary Report
DATE: January 22, 2002
Introduction
Bridgeland Development Company has purchased the Maple Hills Par 3 Golf Course site and is
proposing to construct townhomes on the property. The development proposal will be
considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in February. The site will need to be
served by a sanitary sewer lift station. The Bennington Woods development is currently served
by a City -owned lift station. A single lift station to serve both developments would be most
efficient for the City's utility. Bridgeland Development has requested a public improvement
project to coordinate the abandonment of the Bennington Woods lift station along with
construction of the new lift station. A preliminary report to detail the costs and financing plan for
the proposed project is recommended.
Background
The attached location map and letter describe the proposed project. This parcel, which is
currently a Par 3 golf course, is below the area's sanitary sewer system. The Bennington Woods
Development is immediately to the southeast of this parcel and must also be served by a City -
owned lift station. The Bennington Woods station was constructed in 1985 and is due to be
refurbished. A more cost effective approach would be to construct a new lift station within the
Maple Hills Development and abandon the Bennington Woods station, with the flow rerouted to
the new station. There would be no cost or interruption of service to the residents of Bennington
Woods; however, due to the service implications and coordination required, this project should
be a public improvement under the direct control of the City.
The process for considering this project is through the preparation of a preliminary report. The
report would consider the cost of the improvements along with a financing plan. The financing
plan would include assessments to Bridgeland Development along with any city assistance from
the Sanitary Sewer Fund. The report would be returned to the city council for consideration at a
public hearing. The estimated cost of the report preparation is $2,000. Bridgeland Development
will cover this cost if the project does not proceed.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution authorizing
preparation of a preliminary report for the lift station relocation at the Maple Hills
Development.
RCA
Attachments
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS, it is proposed to abandon a lift station and construct a new lift
station within the proposed Maple Hills Development at Parkway Drive and T.H. 61, Cit
Project 02 -04, and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and
that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the
council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost
effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in
connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement
as recommended, and
FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $2,000 are appropriated to prepare
this feasibility report.
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS, it is proposed to construct abandon a lift station and construction a
new lift station within the proposed Maple Hills Development at Parkway Drive and T.H.
61, City Project 02 -XX, and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the
cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota_ Statutes, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and
that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the
council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost
effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in
connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement
as recommended, and
FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $2,000 are appropriated to prepare
this feasibility report.
dn
CU
in MEN
G at Y T
Maplewood
St. Pau!
Location. Map
V
CU �
J �a
�o
z
Larpenteur Avenue
BRIDGELAND DEVEL COMPANY
952 985 -5000 20141 Icenic Trail, Lakeville, MN 55044
FAX: 952 469 -5906
January 8, 2002
r R. Charles Ahl
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Carriage Homes
g of Maple Hills
Dear Chuck:
Based on our discussion with the
e City staff, Bridgeland Development '
publicly p nt is
Petitioning the City to
p y construct the proposed sanitary ew '
eland D ry er lift station
g Development wants the City taff to
y help coordinate
and forcemain. Brid
this process. The costs
haring associated with the lift station
be determined at a anon and forcemain will
later date.
Thank you for your help n this
p matter.
Sincerely,
BRID GLRLMApAELOPMENT COMPANY
St�ien K Nelso n
Vice President
SAN /cf
RECE Iy.
JAN 1 0 2002
Ltr to City -C AN re San Swr Lift Sta & Frcmn 010802.doc
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT
School District 622
North St. Paul - Maplewood- Oakdale
WHEREAS, on November 6, 2001 approval •
� of School District Referendum
Revenue Authorization failed approval b the voter '
Y s of the district; and
WHEREAS, due to a budget shortfall of '
_ 2003 includes the closing $6.7 million, proposed budget cuts for
2002 of schools • g
g ,and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood considers ders Beaver Lake School and
Harmony School as an asset of significant value to
the community from an educational
and historical standpoint; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood
boar p recognizes the difficulty of the school
din making budget cuts but encourages the he school district to do what it can within
hi
its power to keep Beaver Lake School
1 and Harmony School to service en o
community of Young children. p the
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the Cit
of Maplewood, resolves to encourage School Y
g of District 622 to do everything possible
keep local schools, specifically two Ma g p to
Y Maplewood Schools open and serving he
co The City Council of Maplewood g
. p wood encourages all of its citizens to support
our public education, especially during his fin crisis. pp
g financial crisis. Together we can find
resolution to insure proper funding f our schools, ools, which will foster the financial health
and vitality of our co chools. The •
Y School Board is encouraged to exhaust a
other options to avoid closure of the 11
two schools which would be a significant loss
the entire community. g to
Attest: n
Robert Cardi , Mayor•
Karen Guzlfoile, Ci Clerk