HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002 03-25 City Council PacketCity Council /Manager Workshop — 6: 00 p. m.
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, March 2.5, 2002
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 02 -06
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of City Council Meeting from March 11, Meeting 02 -05
2. Minutes of Meeting from Council /Manager's Workshop, March 11, 2002
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1. Resolution — Stephanie Sward Hometown Day
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the
Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Planning Commission's 2001 Annual Report
3.. Transfer to Close Fund for Lift Station No. 9 Project
4. Transfer for 2001 Bond Issue
5. Transfer to Close Debt Service Fund for 1992 Tax Increment Bonds
6. Purchase of 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe — Police Department
7. Law Enforcement Block Grant Expenditure Account — Police Department
8. Resolution to Maintain a Suburban Courthouse
9. International City Management Exchange
10. Public Safety Communication Supervisor Benefits
11. Temporary Gambling — Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary — Spring Festival
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 Hillcrest Animal Hospital (1320 County Road D)
A. Conditional Use Permit
B. Design Approval
2. 7:15 Hillcrest Animal Hospital Water Main Improvement, Project 01 -28: Resolution Ordering
Improvement after Public Hearing (4 Votes)
3. 7:30 Maple Hills Lift Station Relocation, Project 02 -04: Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public
Hearing (4 Votes)
4. 7:40 Code Amendment — Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (First Reading) (4 Votes)
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Purchase of Soccer Lighting System — Hazelwood Park
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Intoxicating Liquor License Application — 5 -8 Tavern & Grill — 2289 Minnehaha Avenue
2. County Road D Improvements, City Proj ect 01 -15 :
A. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids
B. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll
C. Resolution Ordering Assessment Hearing
D. Resolution to Approve No Parking
3. Markham Pond Outlet Improvements, Project 02 -02: Resolution Approving Preliminary Report and
Calling Public Hearing
4. Lift Station Number 2 Abandonment Improvement, Project 00 -11: Approve Project Plans and Authorize
Receipt of Bids
5. City Newsletter Advertising
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in
advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for
availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City ofMaplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following
these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood
that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language.
A.
Be
C.
W
E .
DRAFT -- MINUTES°
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCI
G
7:00 P.M., Monday, March 11, 2002 faction b Council
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 02 -05 Date
Endorsed
CALL TO ORDER: Modified
Rejected
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal Building, and was
called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the City Council Minutes of February 25, 2002 meeting No.
02 -04 as amended.
Page one: Item E, Nl. should read Planning Commission/Park Board /City Council
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk
Ayes -All
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the Council Workshop Minutes of February 25 2002, as
presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Collins, Juenemann, and Koppen
Abstain - Councilmember Wasiluk
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
M1. Maplewood Historical Quilt
M2. Park and Recreation Publication
M3. Tree Planting Reminder
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Agenda as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
City Council Meeting 03 -11 -02
1
F. APPOINTMENT S /PRESENTATIONS
The City Council appointed Jacqueline Monahan -Junek to the Maplewood Planning Commission for a
term that will expire on December 31, 2002.
G. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
1. Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS
T1 ATTAT)T T
$6,424.70
Checks #57022 thru #57025 dated 2/15 thru
2/21/02
$99,749.96
Checks #57026 thru #57076 dated 2/22 thru
2/26/02
$139,187.73
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 2/15 thru 2/25/02
$M380.82
Checks #57077 thru 957079 dated 2/26 thru
3/l/02
$328,483.73
Checks #57080 thru #57135 dated 3/5/02
$188,976.80 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 2/22 thru 3/4/02
$781,203.74 Total Accounts Payable
T) A 'X 7 !l T T
$372,306.93 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
3/1/02
$30,449.50 Payroll Deduction checks #88124 thru #88132
dated 3/1/02
$100 Merit Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits
dated 2/8/02
$503 Total Payroll
$1,284,223.42 GRAND TOTAL
2. Approval of the Fire Department and EMS Study Expenditure
Approved the expenditure of the $24,000 to $25,000 to The Mercer Group for their assistance in
developing a strategic plan for both fire and EMS and ask that the Finance Department make the necessary
budget adjustment.
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
2
3. Transfer from Community Center Operations Fund to Data Processing Fund
Approved a transfer of $6,130.27 from the Community Center Operations Fund to the Data Processing
Fund for the Computer System and (2) authorize the appropriate budget changes.
4. Receipt of Funds — Police Department Training Compensation
Accepted $8,156.43 from the White Bear Lake Police Department from proceeds received from
several partnership training sessions.
5. Community Design Review Board 2001 Annual Report
Accepted the 2001 Community Design Review Board Annual Report.
6. Conditional Use Permit Review — Islamic Institute (1460 Skillman Avenue)
Accepted staffs recommendation to review the permit for the Islamic Institute again only if a problem
arises or if the applicant proposes a change with the following exception: This time extension is subject to
the applicant painting the new roof -top mechanical equipment to match the building by June 30, 2002. If
the applicant has not painted the equipment by then, the city council shall review this permit again.
7. Conditional Use Permit Review — Choice Auto Rental (2923 Highway 61 North)
Accepted staffs recommendation to review the conditional use permit for the motor vehicle rental business
at 2923 Highway 61 North again in one year.
8. Conditional Use Permit Review — Maplewood Corner Shoppes (2303 White Bear Avenue)
Accepted staffs recommendation to review the conditional use permit for the Maplewood Corner Shoppes
at 2303 White Bear Avenue again only if a problem arises with the development or if the owner proposes a
change to the facility.
9. Conditional Use Permit Review — Jehovah's Witness Kingdom Hall (925 Century Avenue North)
Review the conditional use permit for Jehovah's Witness Kingdom Hall, 925 Century Avenue North in
one year.
10. Approve Grant to Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed for WaterFest 2002
Approved a grant to the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed for WaterFest 2002 in the amount of
$500.00.
11. Change in Minutes — February 11, 2002
Approved the change in minutes from the February 25, 2002 City Council minutes.
12. Historical Society — Food Permit — Fee Waiver
Approved to issue an annual "Temporary Food Sales" permit and waive the $44.00 per day fee.
City Council Meeting 03 -11 -02
3
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. Maplewood Toyota- Conditional Use Permit Revision and Design Review
A. Conditional Use Permit Revision
B. Design Approval
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Assistant Community Development Director Ekstrand and City Engineer Ahl presented the
specifics of the report.
C. Commissioner Eric Ahlness presented the Planning Commission report.
d. Boardmember Linda Olson presented the Community Design Review Board report
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following
persons were heard:
Andy Helchoir, General Manager, 5588 Park Place Drive, Shoreview
Frederick Richter, Steiner Development, 3610 County Road 101, Wayzata
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit
revision for a 4,972 - square -foot service area addition on Maplewood Toyota at 2873 Highway 61:
RESOLUTION 02 -03 -027
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Steve McDaniels, of Maplewood Toyota, applied for a conditional use permit revision to add onto
an automobile repair garage.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 151(b)(9) requires a CUP for maintenance garages.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2873 Highway 61. The legal description is:
Subject to widened STH 61/1, Lot 101 Gardena Addition to Ramsey County, MN.
(PIN 04- 29 -22 -41 -0006)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On February 20, 2002, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On March 11, 2002 the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper
and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city
staff and planning commission.
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use
permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would
be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the
development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of city council approval or the
permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Beam Avenue shall not be used for loading or unloading.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins
Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans date - stamped January 23, 2002, for a 4,972 - square -foot
service area addition on the south side of Maplewood Toyota. This approval is based on the findings required
by the city code. The approval shall be subject to the applicant or owner meeting the following conditions
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
b. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall submit a grading, drainage, utility and
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. All curb removal, curb replacement and
paving overlay shall be subject to the requirements of the city engineer.
c. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for staff
approval showing enough customer parking spaces on the main Toyota Dealership site north of
the building. This parking shall be signed for "customer parking." The applicant shall provide
written justification for staff verifying that there will be sufficient customer parking provided.
The revised site plan shall provide for all of the handicap parking spaces to be placed adjacent to
the building. There shall be enough spaces to meet ADA (Americans with Disability Act)
requirements. These spaces shall be striped according to ADA requirements.
d. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall submit a photometric plan for the new
exterior lighting proposed on the site.
e. Complete the following before occupying the addition:
1) Any new roof - mounted mechanical equipment on the addition shall be painted to match
the building. Any roof -top equipment visible from nearby homes must be screened
according to ordinance.
2) Install fire protection and alarm systems as required by the fire marshal.
3) Repair all damaged sections of the chain link fence, repair /replace the broken fascia on
the northerly shed and remove any debris and stored materials that are in the open. At the
applicant's discretion, instead of repairing or replacing the damaged sections of chain link
fence, the chain link fence located on the west side of the lot can be removed entirely.
4) Patch the parking lot not planned for bituminous overlay, restripe all customer - parking
areas, overlay the south parking lot and install all proposed new curbing.
5) Redirect the two wall- mounted lights on the west side of the building to face directly
downward as well as any new west - facing lights on the addition.
6) The replacement curb shall be continuous concrete curbing, subject to the design
requirements of the city engineer.
f. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
2) The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The
amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter,
or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
3) The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work.
g. All work shall follow the approved plans. The - director of community development may approve
minor changes.
City Council Meeting 03 -11 -02
no
h. The city encourages the applicant to remove one or more of the three sheds on the property.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All
2. 7:10 St. Jerome's Church Addition (380 Roselawn Avenue)
A. Conditional Use Permit Revision
B. Design Approval
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Assistant Community Development Director Ekstrand presented the specifics of the report.
C. Commissioner Eric Ahlness presented the Planning Commission report.
d. Boardmember Linda Olson presented the Community Design Review Board report
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following
persons were heard:
Eric Ketelsen, MCI Architects, Inc., 1439 Blair Avenue
Ken Klutske, 458 Woodriff Avenue, Roseville
Jerry Bimmer, 2011 Edgemont Street
Ken Ludescher, Pastor of St. Jeromes
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolution adopting the resolution granting a
conditional use permit revision and desi n�approval for the expansion of a preschool at St. Jerome's
Catholic School:
RESOLUTION 02 -03 -028
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, St. Jerome's Catholic School applied for a conditional use permit for the expansion
of a preschool;
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 380 Roselawn Avenue East, Maplewood,
Minnesota. The legal description is:
The East 1 /2 of the NW Quarter of the NW Quarter of the SW Quarter of Section 17, Township
29, Range 22; and also the N 233 ft of the E 160 ft of the W 327.31 ft of the SW 1 /4 of Section 17,
Township 29, Range 22; and also the S 75 ft of the N 433 ft of the W 1 /2 of the NW 1 /4 of the NW Quarter
of the SW 1 /4, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22; and also the W 1 /2 of the NE 1 /4 of the NW 1 /4 of the
SW 1 /4, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22, except that part deeded to Ramsey County as shown by a
deed in Book 750 of Deeds on page 634, and except an easement for highway purposes; and also S 125
ft of the N 358 ft of the W 327 and 327.31 ft of the N Quarter of the NW Quarter of the SW Quarter of
Section 17, Township 29, Range 22, subject to the rights of the public in highways, according to the
United States Government Survey thereof.
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
7
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Number for this property is as follows:
17- 29 -22 -32 -0004.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On February 20, 2002, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
conditional use permit.
2. On March 112002, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted
the public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written
statements. The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff
and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity
with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and
fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction of St. Jerome's Preschool addition shall follow the site plan approved by the
city. The director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed preschool addition must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one
City Council Meeting 03 -11 -02
I
year.
3. The city council shall review this permit 'in one year.
r
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans date stamped January 9, 2002, for a 3,800 square foot
addition to St. Jerome's Catholic School. The city is approving these plans based on the findings required by
code. The applicant shall do the following_
a. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project.
b. Complete the following before the City issues a building permit:
(1) Provide a revised landscape plan to be approved by staff showing: three ornamental trees of at
least 1 V2 caliper inch to be planted on the west side of the addition, across the drive aisle; and low -
maintenance shrubbery or perennial plants to be planted along the new sidewalk, around the
proposed bollard lights.
(2) Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval.
C. Complete the following before occupying the building:
(1) Screen all new roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property.
(2) St. Jerome's School is exempt from the dumpster screening requirements as long as the
dumpsters are stored on the southwest corner of the lot, in between the school and the
garage and remains screened by surrounding mature trees.
(3) All exterior lighting installed must comply with the city's lighting ordinance and must not
exceed a 0.4 -foot candle at the property line.
d. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy if:
(1) The City determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
(2) The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
9
(3) The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work.
e. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
1 7:20 Code Amendment —Pawn Shops and Currency Exchange Businesses (First reading) — 4
Votes
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented the specifics of the report.
C. Commissioner Eric Ahlness presented the Planning Commission report.
d. Boardmember Linda Olson presented the Community Design Review Board report
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following
person was heard:
Linda Olson, 2005 E. County Road C, Maplewood
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolution adopting the ordinance amendments
that clarify language to the pawnbroker licensing requirements specifying that a conditional use permit is
required for pawnbrokers and also relocates the newly adopted currency exchange ordinance form under
the pawn broker article to its own article. The second ordinance (business commercial zoning district
amendment) revises the Business Commercial and Light Manufacturing zoning district.
ORDINANCE NO. 824
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PAWNBROKER AND
CURRENCY EXCHANGE LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances:
Section 1. This amends Section 22 -20 (Pawnbroker Licensing Application) by clarifying the licensing
requirements for pawnbrokers [deletions are stricken and additions are underlined]:
Sec. 22 -20. Applications for licenses.
W • r
6 go!
VIIII 1 1110 IIIIIEVA V III lill Il 11:11LWA 111 11111 In ll R%IIMWAwglllllll 111111111111 1 111 W N LWML-A ENILAM" LWJ h,�WIMLIJLVA SAALyi-malp ILVUKI! 11 Will WAN
L-js!qvj L v j 8 ILWA
9%IWANI
Ifik* ME
M ILWAM 93 0 &WAW-j 6 a 11 11 � W W WAWA 1 L'G
It j!l • ��
-AiM6r-'l 6r kj pfflm
r�
P.M 111 ur�IELSIIIK Way
• •
•
• • • • • • • • • •
W . M . TM
1
I • •
P
7 • • • • • • • • • 1 • • • • •
W 1 11
0 •
• • •
City Council Meeting 03 -11 -02
HE
The applicant for a pawnbroker's license under this article shall apply to the city clerk for such license and a
copy thereof shall be forwarded to the chief of police. The chief of police, or an officer duly detailed by the
chief for such purpose, shall investigate the applicant and report the results of such investigation to the city
council.
The city council must approve all pawnbroker's license. The city council may disapprove an application for the
following reasons:
1. Violation of any provision of the state pawnbroker law contained in Minnesota Statutes.
2. The location of the proposed business does not compl with applicable zoning, building or fire codes.
All pawnbrokers must obtain a conditional use permit.
3. Any one (1) or more of th e reasons, conditions or standards for adverse action under Section 36-435 of
the city code.
Section 2. This amendment moves Section 22.1 (Currency Exchange) to Article II.A.:
ARTICLE II. PAWNBROKERS
a 11 611 6r, 1-2
1 1 '�X VAI&A ih
WA
>
>
JLVA 91
>
9 ILVA N wwwMarffAlloo, WW I
I ill I wil W ill I I W , Iffi I MIM 9"% 11 V
1111 a " A is
•
I w qw7l 6
•
• •
The applicant for a pawnbroker's license under this article shall apply to the city clerk for such license and a
copy thereof shall be forwarded to the chief of police. The chief of police, or an officer duly detailed by the
chief for such purpose, shall investigate the applicant and report the results of such investigation to the city
council.
The city council must approve all pawnbroker's license. The city council may disapprove an application for the
following reasons:
1. Violation of any provision of the state pawnbroker law contained in Minnesota Statutes.
2. The location of the proposed business does not compl with applicable zoning, building or fire codes.
All pawnbrokers must obtain a conditional use permit.
3. Any one (1) or more of th e reasons, conditions or standards for adverse action under Section 36-435 of
the city code.
Section 2. This amendment moves Section 22.1 (Currency Exchange) to Article II.A.:
ARTICLE II. PAWNBROKERS
• _ • • • "MC I • • - -- • •
m a . � 00A C TO T. T
•
1 11 �_
• • •
City Council Meeting 03 -11 -02
11
a 11 611 6r, 1-2
1 1 '�X VAI&A ih
WA
MOW&
JLVA 91
W le A of q q 11. W q Ill AN WAI
9 ILVA N wwwMarffAlloo, WW I
I ill I wil W ill I I W , Iffi I MIM 9"% 11 V
1111 a " A is
•
I w qw7l 6
• •
�
• •
• • •
• ■
�� •
•t
•
• •
•
• • ■ •
• VI • 11 1
W
i
11 .0.
11 MLVWVA
•
all, q
r AIII! n
•
•
•
• V LqVF 11 LVW 1 l
L p� '
•
• •
•
Z2 F.V--'WM
ffr-W.N M
al
US WI 1, 11111111111111111111111111
• _ • • • "MC I • • - -- • •
m a . � 00A C TO T. T
•
1 11 �_
• • •
City Council Meeting 03 -11 -02
11
C4 421
WW LjLjLjLjVwU%w > > > > .
ARTICLE ILA. CURRENCY EXCHANGE
(a) Definition: The term "currency exchange" is defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 53A.01, subdivision
1. Currency exchange means any person, except a bank, trust company, savings bank, savings and loan
association, credit union, or industrial loan or thrift companengaged in the business of cashing checks,
drafts, money orders or travelers' checks for a fee. Currency exchange does not include a person who
provides these services incidental to the person's primary business if the charge for cashing a check or
draft does not exceed one dollar ($1.00) or one (1) percent of the value of the check or draft, whichever
is ueater.
(b) License required. No person shall exercise, carry on or engage in the trade or business of currency
exchange in Maplewood without first having obtained a license from the city to do so in conformance
with this Chapter and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 53A.
(c) Each license shall be issued to the applicant only and shall not be transferable.
�d) Each license shall be issued only for the premises described in the application and shall not be
transferable to a different location.
(e) No change in ownership, control or location of a license shall be permitted except by amendment to the
license. Such license amendment must be approved by the City Council.
( No more than one (1) currency exchange license shall be issued by the City at any time. The City shall
_ ive priority to qualified applicants for renewal of an existing license.
fig) License fee. The amount of the annual license fee for a currency exchan -ge license under this article shall
be imposed, established, set and fixed by the City Council, by resolution, from time to time.
(h, Applications for license. The applicant for a currency exchange license under this article shall apples
the city clerk for such license and a copy thereof shall be forwarded to the chief of police. The chief of
police, or an officer duly detailed by the chief for such purpose, shall investigate the applicant and report
the results of such investigation to the City Council.
City Council Meeting 03 -11 -02
12
A -41 ray. Milk
• t t I• t
r . . . • . .. � . . . • .
• • = t • • t t • • t t t
• t t • I t I
. . r..
• • t
� : r
Pill 111 NEWALWAIIIIIIIIIIiiiis
ARTICLE ILA. CURRENCY EXCHANGE
(a) Definition: The term "currency exchange" is defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 53A.01, subdivision
1. Currency exchange means any person, except a bank, trust company, savings bank, savings and loan
association, credit union, or industrial loan or thrift companengaged in the business of cashing checks,
drafts, money orders or travelers' checks for a fee. Currency exchange does not include a person who
provides these services incidental to the person's primary business if the charge for cashing a check or
draft does not exceed one dollar ($1.00) or one (1) percent of the value of the check or draft, whichever
is ueater.
(b) License required. No person shall exercise, carry on or engage in the trade or business of currency
exchange in Maplewood without first having obtained a license from the city to do so in conformance
with this Chapter and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 53A.
(c) Each license shall be issued to the applicant only and shall not be transferable.
�d) Each license shall be issued only for the premises described in the application and shall not be
transferable to a different location.
(e) No change in ownership, control or location of a license shall be permitted except by amendment to the
license. Such license amendment must be approved by the City Council.
( No more than one (1) currency exchange license shall be issued by the City at any time. The City shall
_ ive priority to qualified applicants for renewal of an existing license.
fig) License fee. The amount of the annual license fee for a currency exchan -ge license under this article shall
be imposed, established, set and fixed by the City Council, by resolution, from time to time.
(h, Applications for license. The applicant for a currency exchange license under this article shall apples
the city clerk for such license and a copy thereof shall be forwarded to the chief of police. The chief of
police, or an officer duly detailed by the chief for such purpose, shall investigate the applicant and report
the results of such investigation to the City Council.
City Council Meeting 03 -11 -02
12
The City Council must approve all currency exchange licenses. The City Council mgy disapprove an
application for the following reasons:
1. Violation of any provision of the state currency exchange law contained in Chapter 53A.
2. The location of the proposed business does not comply with applicable zoning, building or fire codes.
All currency exchange businesses must obtain a conditional use permit.
3. Any one (1) or more of the reasons, conditions or standards for adverse action under Section 3 6 -43 5 of
City Code.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper.
ORDINANCE NO. 825
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BUSINESS COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances:
Section 1. This amendment revises Section 36 -151 to allow pawnbrokers and currency exchanges within the
Business Commercial and Light Manufacturing zoning districts with a conditional use permit if at least three
hundred fifty (350) feet or more from any property the city is planning for residential use [deletions are stricken
and additions are underlined]
Section 36- 151(a). Permitted uses. The city shall only permit the following uses by right:
���:T T.7. . • . . _ _ . _ III
(13) Reserved.
Section 36- 151(b). Conditional uses. The following uses must have a conditional use permit:
Ito) IN ... X5111111111 a All
_. M _ -
. All -
z -ins
P awnbroker as defined in Section 22. All pawnbrokers are subject to the followin
1. They must be located at least three hundred fifty (350) feet from a residential lot line, and three
hundred fifty (350) feet of any school or church.
2. City licensing as regulated in section 22 of the cit code.
15 Currency Exchange as defined in Section 22. All currency exchanges are subject to the followin
1. They must be located at least three hundred fifty (350) feet from a residential lot line, and three
hundred fifty (350) feet of any school or church.
2. City licensing as regulated in Section 22 of the citycode.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper.
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
13
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All
I. AWARD OF BIDS
None
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. County Road D Improvements, Proj ect 01 -15
A. Resolution Removing Overlay between Hazelwood and White Bear Avenue from Project
Work
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adopt the following resolution removing the overlay proj ect
between Hazelwood Street and White Bear Avenue from the overall County Road D Improvement
Proj ect Citeses j ect, 01 -15 .
RESOLUTION 02 -03 -029
REMOVING OVERLAY FROM ORDERED PROJECT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 14th day of January 2002, fixed a date
for a council hearing on the proposed street and utility improvements on County Road D, between
Hazelwood Street and McKnight Road, City Proj ect 01 -15.
AND WHEREAS, the hearing was duly held on January 28, 2002.
AND WHEREAS, the project included two phases, one east of White Bear Avenue to McKnight
Road as a full reconstruction project, and one phase west of White Bear Avenue to Hazelwood Street.
AND WHEREAS, the City Engineer was directed to prepare project plans for both phases of the
improvement.
AND WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported that the phase west of White Bear Avenue to
Hazelwood Street is probably not feasible as proposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That the improvement of County Road D between Hazelwood Street and White Bear Avenue is
hereby removed from the project as ordered on the 28 day of January 2002.
2. That it remains necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the
City of Maplewood make street and utility improvements on County Road D, between White
Bear Avenue and McKnight Road, City Project 01 -15.
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
14
3. Such improvement, east of White Bear Avenue to McKnight Road, remains ordered as proposed
in the council resolution adopted the 28th day of January 2002.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Comfort Bus S anitary S ewer Realignment, Proj ect 01 -21:
A. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the following resolution that accepts the report and
orders the improvement for the sanitary sewer main repair at the proposed Comfort Bus site, City
Proi ect 01 -21:
RESOLUTION 02 -03 -029
APPROVING PLANS AND ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on December 17, 2001, plans and
specifications for the Comfort Bus Sanitary Sewer Relocation, City Project 01 -21, have been prepared by
(or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the
council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are
hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction
Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved
plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the
date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly
opened and considered by the council at 10:00 a.m., on the 17th day of April, 2002, at the city
hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied
by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of
the amount of such bid.
3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read
aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The
council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of
April 22, 2002.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
15
2. Maple Hills Lift Station Relocation, Project 02 -04:
Resolution Accepting Report, Calling for Public Hearing and Authorizing the Preparation of
Plans and Specifications
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the following resolution accepting report, calling for a
public hearing and authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the lift station relocation at
the Maple Hills Development, Project 02 -04:
RESOLUTION 02 -03 -30
ACCEPTING REPORT, CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING, AND
AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted January 28, 2002, a report has been
prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the Maple Hills Lift Station Relocation
Project, City Project 02 -04, and this report was received by the council on March 11, 2002, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, and
WHEREAS, the financing of all essential work is clearly defined and will be paid for by the
developer and the Maplewood Sanitary Sewer Fund, and
WHEREAS, it is important that the design of this project begin as soon as possible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the
assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 25th day of March, 2002, in
the council chambers of city hall at 7:30 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published
notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to begin the
preparation of final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement.
4. Furthermore, additional funds in the amount of $45,000 are appropriated to begin the preparation
of these final plans and specifications.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
16
3. Hillcrest Animal Hospital Water Main Improvement, Project 01 -28 :
Resolution Accepting Report and Calling for Public Hearing
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolution accgpting the report, calling for a
public hearing for 7:15 on March 25, 2002 for the T.H. 61 /County Road D (Hillcrest Animal Hospital
Water Main Improvements, Prot ect 01 -28:
RESOLUTION 02 -03 -031
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted December 10, 2001, a report has been
prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of Hillcrest Animal
Hospital Water Main Improvement at T.H. 61 and County Road D, City Project 01 -28, and this report
was received by the council on March 11, 2002, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost - effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider water main improvements in the area of T.H. 61 and County Road D in
accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost
of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the
improvement of $242,700.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 25th day of March, 2002, in
the council chambers of city hall at 7:15 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published
notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All
4. Holloway /McKnight Signal System, City Project 01 -03 :
A. Approve Project Initiation
B. Approve Signal Justification Report
C. Approve Project Plans
D. Approve Cost Share Agreement with Ramsey County
a. City Manger Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
17
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the initiation of the project, the signal __justification report
(available in the city engineer's office) project plans and the cost sharing agreement with Ramsey
County for an estimated amount of $3,975 and authorize the mayor and city manager to execute said
agreement.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
5. Sewer Claim at 943 Century Avenue
a. City Manger Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report.
C. The following persons were heard:
Ron Cockreil, 943 Century Avenue North, Maplewood
Councilmember Koppen moved to authorization of a $3,000 payment to Ron Cockreil to assist with
payment of a sewer service repair at 943 Century Avenue North.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All
6. Markham Pond Outlet Improvements, Project 02-02:
Resolution Approving Preliminary Report and Calling for Public Hearing
a. City Manger Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl asked that this item be table until the March 25, 2002 City Council meeting.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to table Markham Ponds Outlet Improvements, City Project 02 -02
unit the March 25, 2002 meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
7. Alcohol Non - Compliance Penalty — The Rock
a. City Manger Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented the specifics of the report.
C. The following parties were heard:
Michael Ogren, 2029 Woodlynn Avenue, Maplewood
Councilmember Collins moved to impose a one thousand dollar fine to The Rock for a first time liquor
vi nl nti nn
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
18
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
8. Alcohol Non - Compliance Penalty — Bleechers
a. City Manger Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented the specifics of the report.
C. The following parties were heard:
Stephen Yantes, 2220 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood
Councilmember Collins moved to impose a five hundred dollar fine to Bleechers for a first time liquor
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Ron Cockreil Mr. Cockreil thanked the council for adoption of a resolution in support of School
District 622. He also denied any financial support from the city in order to leave his claim open. He
will continue to pursue his claim with the League of Minnesota Cities.
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. City Historical Quilt -The city council will discuss this topic at the March 25, 2002
Council /Manger's workshop.
2. Parks and Recreation Catalog - Councilmember Koppen was concerned that the Mayors column in
the recent Maplewood In Motion addressed national issues rather than city issues. Parks and
Recreation Director Anderson presented the new format of the Maplewood and Motion
publication. ,
3. Friend of the Parks Tree Sale - Councilmember Juenemann encouraged everyone to make a gift of
a tree to the park and that the deadline is April 12, 2002.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Collins moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:09 P.M.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - All
City Council Meeting 03-11-02
19
AGENDA ITEM NO.,
CITY COUNCIL /MANAGER WORKSHOP A by Council
Monday, March 11, 2002
Council Chambers, City Hall
6:00 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
B. ROLL CALL.
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember
Kathleen A. Juenemann, Councilmember
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Others Present:
City Manager Richard Fursman
Assistant City Manager Melinda Coleman
City Clerk Karen Guilfoile
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Wasiluk moved approved of the agenda
Councilmember Juenemann seconded Ayes -All
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Planning Commission Appointment Interview
The council completed interviews for the vacancy on the Maplewood Planning Commission.
Jackie Monahan -Junek was selected to fill the term which will expire on December 31, 2002.
2. Presentation from Roger Williams of the Metropolitan Council
Roger Williams, Metropolitan Council, was present to meet the council and to express his
willingness to work as a partnership in achieving planning goals for the city.
Council/Manager's Workshop 3 -11 -02
3. Organized Garbage Collection Discussion
Assistant City Manager Coleman asked the council for direction on the next step they would like
staff to take regarding the possibility of organized collection of solid waste with Ramsey County.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to direct staff to - pursue further details, possible city
obligations and the results of the Ramsey County Study regarding organized collection of solid
waste.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk
E.
F.
FUTURE TOPICS
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Collins, Juenemann, Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmember Koppen
1. Exploring the Possibilities of a Sister City
2. White Bear Avenue Streetscapes
3. Housing and Business Redevelopment
4. Ordinance Regulating Buckthorn
5. Ward System as Presented by Maplewood Resident Emil Sturzenegger
6. City Hall Courtyard
7. Open Space
8. City Quilt
ADJOURNMENT
CounciWanager's Workshop 3 -11-02
r- - ,v�l - ; "ice: - . .'!i' - `..' ��'. - ?. iy '/ �. •::i'� -. SY / /// -.. \:ill /� _ _ � i;1'��!',1, -
�~ : \�:� I �- ;i /f". � . ,:i�. I �, -Y � �• ��!- f`ti��'. I ' �� j� -I, \> :% �' �1��'• •I1 � .� : -./ '� • 4 // �..
.�� _- 1\ \'_ ;'jam , r•,.1 � I - i.•;. �!- ,Ij l }t. •4 � '�� °�•• ♦ �'. ".. � �.
•s 1+111+
i i i J i{ iJ i i !JIlJ1f i!
J 1 fJl Iflfilili 111illlJf71111111+111J/! 1+111 , ,� r " ,•.•,• ,•,...... „ ,,.,,...�,• .................. .� ,. \
1 .-... � .. ..... ... ........,.,. :. ..,, •....: :., :... ;;: .;; ...; ..,: :•: ,.•: � :::•::.......... ........... ..... .L..... i 7111111 J 1 1
iJ l llllll�ilJllililJl111 illilll+lilJilllllll 1J , " ' •••"•'•••„ " „ .,•,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, „......,
v ., .. .. N .: ... .. .... .. ........ ,...;...,.... ........... ... .....: : ..,...,r. :�: :•..... :. :�:::....: :y: ::... :::: :: :: :•.:.�., :........... ..lL........ f1 /11f111 /l/l/lililli lilf l+/f illl ! - •�
� a. � .... • .. - •, ..1. _. ,LI,; 1i1, 1, 1l, I,1 �+1 J1,/ 1,1 /,1t,,I,LI,lili@�1,1J11111f1 ;1,.+�•ii1r; +iii1t11JY7'f1'i'+4
Ar
Resolution
_
Stephanie Sward Hometown Da
y
WHEREAS, the Cit of Ma lewood is actively concern a
-° tY p y d nd involved
"`°” '��• � _ - in nurturing and u '
ment and
g supporting the educational and physical development p Y p
achievements of its natives and residents, and
WHEREAS the
e achievements academically and athletically of our native -
citizen Stephanie Sward are a source of great communit ride and ..;. g t p interest as
she represents our hometown ion the nation and at the University of Minnesota
as an accomplished athlete and student, and
E =4� a - WHEREAS, she will be especially honored during ceremonies at the
= University of Minnesota; and "Rainbow Foods Hometown Days celebration of
her achievements is representative of the recognition our City su
p g tY pports, _
. +tom /:•v -
•
THEREFORE, y
�• � as Ma of the City of Maplewood Minnesota I here
y
do ordain and declare the date of April 28, 2002 as the official Stephanie Sward
Hometown Day in the City of Maplewood.
...�� � tY p -
Proclaimed b the City Council of the C i t y of Ma plewood this 2 -
Y Y ty p 8th day = _
of the month of April, 2002.E
Mayor Robert Cardinal
l% _
00.
s �
A ttest: Karen Guilfoale, City .*Clerk
A
11 '-
z a
;Ll,.,,td, d, rL d.1.I :ra :, :,:r.I,..t.1, .Lr. d,... .d,}:Gtra.,..,.1...,.;.I;,;daaf } T'. }�:; ► r T ;Y `: frf f � . , : � :; • j , t , ,,, „r , • , i r , r , , ;'.:� .o-::. � ::. � :;•:: ;'
AGENDA NO. G-1
AGENDA REPORT
TOO City Council
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS .
DATE: March 18, 2002
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$103,238.28 Checks #57136 thru #57141 dated 3/1 thru
3/4/02
$198,962.86 Checks #57142 thru #57202 dated 3/12/02
$112 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 3/01 thru 3/11/02
$301,504.84 Checks #57203 thru #57256 dated, 3 /19/02
$184,793.01 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 3/8 thru 3/18/02
$900,846.01 Total Accounts Payable
$390,991.87 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
3/15/02
$29 Payroll Deduction checks #88302 thru #88308
dated 3/15/02
$420 Total Payroll
$1.,321,509.72 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any
questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation
on file if necessary.
hu
attachments
FinSec DocumenO
vchlist
M
03/08/2002 112413AM
Gheck Register
City of Naplewood.
;Page: 1
Check
::Date
Vendor
Description /Account
-57136
3/1102
02207
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MN
MONTHLY PREMIUM
57137
3/1/02
00644
HEALTHPARTNERS
MONTHLY PREMIUM
57138
3/1/02
00966
MEDICA CHOICE
MONTHLY PREMIUM
57139
3/1/02
01085
MN LIFE INSURANCE
MONTHLY PREMIUM
57140
3/1102
02203
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LTD
4'MONTHLY PREMIUM
57141
3/4/02
01977
MN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION
UTILITY INSPECTION SCH - 4 REGISTER
57142
3/12/02
00018
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
'EMERGENCY MGMT CELL PHONES
57143
3/12/02
01908
ADMINISTRATION, DEPT OF
DATA PROCESSING - JAN
57144
3/12/02
00111
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
PATROL & BOARDING FEE
-57145
3/12/02
01236
ARCH WIRELESS
PAGERS - MAR
57146
.3/12/02
00135
ASSN. OF TRNG OFFICERS OF MN
POLICE SUPERVISION SURVIVAL TRNG
57147
3/12/02
01811
%BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
57148
3/12/02
00264
CARLSON, TERRIE
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 1/30 TO 2/28/02
57149
3/12/02
01958
COMMERCIAL DRYWALL, INC
DRYWALL SYS & METAL SUPPORT - AP
57150
3/12/02
02419
ELDREDGE TRADING INC
UNIFORM SHIRTS
57151
3/12/02
00463
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
:REPAIR TO AMB #2
57152
3/12/02
00464
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH, INC
LIGHT SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE
57153
3/12/02
00489
FACILITY SYSTEMS, INC -
OFFICE FURNITURE FOR ENGINEER WC
OFFICE FURNITURE FOR ENGINEER WC
57154
3/12/02
02418
FIRE CONVENTION 2002
REGISTRATION & HOUSING- MSFDA CO
57155
3/12/02
02071
FISHER, DAVID
REIMBURSE FOR IAMPO MEETING
57156
3/12/02
00519
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO.
FLEXICROME RODS WITH COUPLING
57157
3/12/02
00527
FOREST PRODUCTS SUPPLY CO.
KEY BOX
57158
3/12/02
00589
GRAF, DAVE
KARATE INSTRUCTOR
57159
3/12/02
02421
'HARRISON, JAMES -
REF GRADING ESC -1777 EDGERTON S
57160
3/12/02
00708
.P.M.A. MN CHAPTER ADMIN
IPMA MEETING 3/27/02
57161
3/12/02
02237
IMPERIAL IMPRESSIONS
PROPERTY RECORD FORMS
57162
3/12/02
01605
lNSTITUTE FOR FORENSIC PSYCH, THE
PSYCH EXAM 2/12/02
PSYCH EXAM 2/16/02
57163
3/12/02
01894
KELLY & FAWCETT PA
LEGAL SERVICES - FEB
PROSECUTION LEGAL SRV - FEB
57164
3/12/02
-00857
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
SAFETY & LOSS CONTROL WORKSHOP
57165
3/12/02
00932
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
BIRTHDAY CAKES
BIRTHDAY CAKES
57166
3/12/02
01819
MCLEOD USA
DSL SERVICE STATION #4
DSL SERVICE - MALL
DSL SERVICE - STATION #3
DSL SERVICE - NATURE CENTER
57167
3/12/02
00986
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
MONTHLY SAC - FEB
57168
3/12/02
.00392
MN COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
NEW NOTARY LICENSE APPLICATION
57169
3/12/02
01977
MN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION
MUNICIPAL UTIL INSP CLASSES 1 & 2
57170
3/12/02
01057
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
MEMBERSHIP DUES
57171
3/12/02
01028
MN STATE TREASURER STAX
MONTHLY SURTAX - FEB
57172
3/12/02
01156
NELSON, JEAN
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 1/3 TO 2/28
57173
3/12/02
01161
NEW BRIGHTON, CITY OF
2002 RAMSEY COUNTY GIS MEMBERSHI
57174
3/12/02
01213
OLSON, JULIE
EMT BOOK & TEST FEE
57175
3/12/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF CLARENCE HOIUM - AMB 01023926
57176
3/12/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF MARY LOU KENDLE - MEMBERSHIP
57177
3/12/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF LOGAN WANG - MEMBERSHIP
57178
3/12/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF JENNIFER RANALLA - PROGRAM
57179
3/12/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF GINA WOOD - PROGRAM
57180
3/12/02
01941
PATRICK GRAPHICS & TROPHIES
TROPHIES FOR YOUTH BASKETBALL
57181
3/12/02
01254
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
MERCH FOR RESALE
A mount
7,219.50
37,308.14
52,606.06
2,944.86
2,699.72
460.00
121.99
392.00
1,263.12
32.56
325.00
361.80
120.60
22.63
5,685.02
2,988.90
182.00
4,715.34
1,295.74
266.25
1,400.00
20.00
1,936.87
50.00
198.00
1,102.05
5.00
816.15
350.00
350.00
14,647.06
5,250.00
20.00
99.75
142.50
148.33
319.10
101.50
71.02
16,632.00
40.00
330.00
250.00
3,399.37
58.40
3,145.00
97.50
157.41
117.20
105.00
66.00
15.00
2,259.50
239.20
vchiist Check ;Register Page: 2
03/08/2002 11:24:13AM Clity of ,Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
:RETROFIT RECYCLING, INC.
57181
3/12/02
01254
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
57182
3/1.2/02
00396
PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
57183
3/12/02
01313
PUMP:AND METER SERVICE, -INC.
57184
3/12/02
01337
`RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
57185
.3/12/02
01360
`REINHART FOODSERVICE
57186
3/12/02
01363
:RETROFIT RECYCLING, INC.
57187
3/12/02
01397
`RYAN PLUMBING & HEATING CO.
57188
3/12/02
01418
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
57189
3/12/02
02420
SEABURY & SMITH
57190
3/12/02
02222
SHEFFIELD, OLSON & MCQUEEN INC
57191
3/12/02
02229
SNELL MECHANICAL INC
57192
3/12/02
01556
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
57193
3/12/02
-01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
57194
3/12/02
01526
STATE TREASURER
57195
3/12/02
'01550
SUMMIT INSPECTIONS
57196
.3/12/02
01574
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
57197
3/12/02
02164
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
57198
3/12/02
01669
TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT &
57199
3/12/02
01739
UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAY TECH
57200
3/12/02
02165
URS / BRW INC
57201
3/12/02
01734
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
57202
3/12/02
01750
WATSON CO INC, THE
.(Continued)
MERCH FOR RESALE
'INTOXILIZER 5000 RECERTIFICATION CL
INTOXILYZER 5000 RECERTIFICATION
REPAIR & CLEAN MAG READER
CITATIONS FURNISHED BY RAMSEY CT
MERCH FOR RESALE
CREDIT - MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE •
RECYCLE BULBS
RECYCLE BULBS
RECYCLE BULBS
REPAIR EQUIPMENT
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
REFUND AMB R MOOSBRUGGER 0100
DCRP & FLEX PLAN WEEKLY PYMTS
REPLACE THE BOILER CONTROL
FUEL
PROJ 01 -04 - RELOCATE HYDRANT
PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES
2002 SPRING BLDG CODE & STANDARD
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
PROJ 99 -07 FINAL PYMT HAZELWOOD S
WINTER ASPHALT
PROJ 01 -16 FEASIBILITY & FINAL DESIG
PROJ 01 -29 - FEASIBILITY & FINAL DES
TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE
3/12/02 SEMINAR FEE
PROD 01 -15 - PROF SRVS THRU 2/8/02
PROJ 01 -28 PROF SRVS THRU 2/8/02
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
MERCH FOR RESALE
Amount
310.25
40.00
40.00
1,113.07
985.7.0
561.83
-7.99
112.04
343.19
159.02
216.58
338.45
268.50
30.90
555.51
1,603.36
1,625.78
120.27
2,940.34
706.20
60.00
2,557.60
68,351.41
22.18
115.85
4,610.99
63.90
58.00
37,281.83
1
135.00
407.40
67 Checks in :this report Total checks : 3029201.14
4
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted
Settlement
Date
Date
P a r�ee
Description
Amount
02/27/02
03/01/02
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
870.50
03/04/02
03/05/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
22,918.48
03/01/02
03/05/02
MN State Treasurer
State Payroll Tax
14,762.21
03/05/02
03/06/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
14,565.70
03/06/02
03/07/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
14,329.85
03/07/02
03/08/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
12
03/01/02
03/08/02
Elan Financial Services
Purchasing card items
21,121.15
03/08/02
03/1
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
.11,326.88
TOTAL
112,347.02
4
vchlist Check Register Page:
03/15/2002 10:23 :14AM Gity of Maplewood
Check Date
57203
3/19/02
57204
3/19/02
57205
3/1.9/02
57206
3/19/02
57207
3/19/02
57208
3/19/02
57209
3/19/02
57210
3/19102
57211
3/19/02
57212
3/19/02
57213
3/19/02
57214
3/19/02
57215
3/1.9/02
57216
3/19/02
57217
3/19/02
57218
3/19/02
57219
3/19/02
57220
3/19/02
57221
3/19/02
57222
3/19/02
57223
3/19102
57224
3/19/02
.57225
3/19/02
57226
3/19/02
57227
3/19/02
Vendor
npscrintinn /Accmrnt
00007
A.M. LEONARD INC.
00111
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
01810
BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD.
00223
'BRODIN STUDIOS, INC.
00240
C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES
02313
CARLSON, BOB
02412
COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS
00330
COPY SERVICE CORP.
00384
DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS
01886
GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORP
00604
GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC.
00668
HIEBERT, STEVEN
00677
HOME DEPOT - GECF
02232
JOHN, GREG
02136
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
00782
KPMG LLP
-02423
LCH PACKAGING LLC
00858
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA
00857
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
00867
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS
00908
M.R.P.A.
00932
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
02424
MAPLEWOOD EXPLORERS PROGRAM
00945
MASYS CORP
01819
MCLEOD USA
57228
3/19/02
02425
MN APCO
57229
3/19/02
01202
NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC
57230
3/19/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
57231
3/19/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
57232
3/19/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
57233
3/19/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
57234
3/19/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
57235
3/19/02
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
57236
3/19/02
01311
P.E.R.A.
57237
3/19/02
01941
PATRICK GRAPHICS & TROPHIES
57238
3/19/02
01313
57239
3/19/02
01337
57240
3/19/02
01337
57241
3/19/02
01337
57242
3/19/02
01359
57243
3/19/02
00069
57244
3/19/02
01427
57245
3/19/02
02222
57246
3/19/02
01468
57247
3/19/02
02229
57248
3/19/02
01504
PUMP AND METER SERVICE, INC.
RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX
RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MN
SHEFFIELD, OLSON & MCQUEEN INC
SLABA, JACLEE
SNELL MECHANICAL INC
ST PAUL, CITY OF
TOOL BLADE BUSTER
PATROL & BOARDING FEES
INVESTIGATION LEGAL SERVICES
PLAQUE
APPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECKS
BASKETBALL REFEREE
FLEET MAINTENANCE SOFTWARE
COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
COPIER RENTAL CHARGE
75' TELESQUIRT
PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES
NARCOTIC TRIALS TUITION
STATION SUPPLIES
DJ SERVICES - DANCE 3/15
WALL PLAQUES
AUDIT FEES
STORAGE TUBES
2002 DUES
MN MAYORS ASSN MEMBERSHIP DUES
DIVERSITY CONTEST ADVERTISEMENT
2002 MEMBERSHIP FEES
BIRTHDAY CAKES
CALENDARS & TRAINING
HARDWARE /SOFTWARE MAINT - APR
DSL SERVICE - PUBLIC WORKS
DSL SERVICE - EDGERTON GYM
DSL SERVICES - STATION 1
DSL SERVICE - STATION 4
DSL SERVICE - MAPLEWOOD MALL
DSL SERVICE - STATION 3
CONFERENCE REGISTRATIONS
PARKS & RECREATION BROCHURE - M
REF LYNETTE SEAL - AMB 01015141
REF JOHN ANDERSON - -ROOM RENTAL.
REF MARILYN ANDERSON - CPR
.REF JULIE MYERS - SWIM LESSONS
REF JEANNE FLACKEY - SWIM LESSON
REF STEPHANIE FORLITI - ARTS & CRAF
ER ID #6120-00,01,51 - 3/15/02 P/R
LEAGUE BASKETBALL TROPHIES
SERVICE PLAQUES
CHECKED TANK MONITOR
TRUTH IN TAXATION NOTICES
TIF ADMIN EXP 2001
DATA PROCESSING SERVICES - JAN
CAR WASHES
COMMISSION PYMT TO COLLECTIONS
GOAL MEETING ROOM RENTAL
DCRP & FLEX PLAN WEEKLY PYMTS
MCC BANNERS - DESIGN & ART
REPLACE MOTOR STARTER & HEATER
PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES
PROJ 01 -04 REPAIR SERVICE CONNECT
PROD 01 -04 - REPAIR SERVICE CONNEC
Amount
37.15
624.51
1,596.00
215.00
50.00
252.00
5,545.00
127.x'9
360.18
149,000.00
615.55
35.00
156.82
300.00
180.00
10,000.00
457.60
170.06
20.00
259.60
902.00
156.75
600.00
738.68
149.90
99.95
69.95
72.17
104.74
101.47
370.00
13,774.00
151.65
90.00
57.00
39.00
39.00
27.00
41,180.45
927.62
76.15
65.66
2,659.50
2,042.30
1,360.00
262.67
1,837.17
75.00
398.45
120.00
696.61
1,269.84
815.92
194.79
vchlist
Check Register
Page: 2
03f'15l2002
10:23:14AM
City of. Maplewood
Check
r
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
mount
57248
3/19/02
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
(Continued)
RADIO SERVICE & MAINT -:FEB
14.25
CRIME LAB SERVICES - FEB
280.00
57249
3/19/02
02422
STACKPOLE, JOHN
BASKETBALL REFEREE
50.00
57250
3/19/02
01560
SUPERIOR SERVICES INC
RECYCLING - FEB
12,700.93
57251
3/19/02
01572
SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.
CARTRIDGES &`TONER
410.36
PRINTER TONER
208.27
TONER CARTRIDGE
357.54
PRINTER TONER
104.14
INK CARTRIDGES
479.94
57252
3/19/02
01649
TRI -STATE BOBCAT,INC.
863 -G SERIES BOBCAT (AS PER YOUR G
3,541.13
57253
3/19/02
01580
TSE, INC.
LAMONT CRANSTON POSTCARDS
48.68
57254
3/19/02
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 01 -14 TELEVISE SEWER SERVICE
300.00
57255
3/19/02
01734
WALSH,. WILLIAM P.
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
312.00
57256
3/19/02
01190
XCEL ENERGY
MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DATE 3 /5/02
41,169.95
54 Checks in this report
Total checks :
301,504.84
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted
Settlement
Date
Date
Payee
Description
.03/06/02.
03/08/02
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
03/11/02
03/12/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
03/12/02
03/13/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
03/13/02
03/14/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
03/14/02
03/15/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
03/08/02
03/15/02
Elan Financial Services
Purchasing card items
03/13/02
03/15/02
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
03/15/02
03/18/02
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
03/15/02
03/18/02
U.S. Treasurer
Federal Payroll.Tax
TOTAL
Amount
975.50
16,348.25
11,949.75
11,947.75
14,017.75
38, 850.46
1,111.50
7,247.00
82, 345.05
184,793.01
7
ad
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
ad
dd
ad
dd
ad
as
dd
dd
dd
dd
ad
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
ad
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
ad
dd
as
dd
dd
dd
dd
dd
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
.03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/ 15 / 02
03/15/02
03/15/02
03/15/02
EMPLOYEE NAME
COLLINS, KENNETH
JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
KOPPEN, MARVIN
DARST, ROBERTA
FURSMAN, RICHARD
SCHLINGMAN, PAUL
SEEGER, GERALD
SWANSON, LYLE
YOUNG, DILLON
CARRLSON, THERESE
LE, SHERYL
FAUST, DANIEL
URBANSKI, HOLLY
ANDERSON, CAROLE
BAUMAN, GAYLE
JACKSON, MARY
KELSEY, CONNIE
TETZLAFF, JUDY
FRY, PATRICIA
GUILFOILE, KAREN
OSTER, ANDREA
CARLE, JEANETTE
JAGOE, CAROL
JOHNSON, BONNIE
OLSON, SANDRA
WEAVER, KRISTINE
CORCORAN, THERESA
MARTINSON, CAROL
POWELL, PHILIP
SPANGLER, EDNA
THOMALLA, DAVID
WINGER, DONALD
ABEL, CLINT
ALDRIDGE, MARK
ANDREWS, SCOTT
BAKKE, LONN
BANICK, JOHN
BELDE, STANLEY
BOHL, JOHN
BOWMAN, RICK
BUSACK, DANIEL
HALWEG, KEVIN
HEINZ, STEPHEN
HERBERT, MICHAEL
AMOUNT
357.47
357.47
357.47
1,265.66
4,396.52
1,951.15
446.44
1,668.87
659.66
2,017.98
3,487.99
3
1,581.54
1,704.63
2,575.00
1,652.26
1,208.29
1,490.34
1,553.54
2,723.56
1,611.94
1,517.51
1,497.13
900.99
956.58
1,360.62
1,291.94
1,544.68
1,860.59
297.00
3,002.66
3,747.55
1,606.79
2,169.29
2,559.54
2,083.16
2,846.10
2,437.25
2,202.09
2,301.20
1,825.48
2,659.26
2,242.61
2,293.25
c,
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
03/15/02
HIEBERT, STEVEN
2,370.26
dd
03/15/02
JOHNSON, KEVIN
2,955.78
dd
03/15/02
KARIS, FLINT
202.20
dd
03/15/02
KONG, TOMMY
1,731.33
dd
03/15/02
KROLL, BRETT
1,507.08
dd
03/15/02
KVAM, DAVID
2473.71
dd
03/15/02
LARSON, DANIEL
1,884.02
dd
03/15/02
LU, JOHNNIE
1,721.66
dd
03/15/02
MARINO, JASON
1
dd
03/15/02
MARTIN, JERROLD
1
dd
03/15/02
OLSON, JULIE
1,867.29
dd
03/15/02
PALMA, STEVEN
2,261.56
dd
03/15/02
PIKE, GARY
2
dd
03/15/02
RABBETT, KEVIN
2,598.90
dd
03/15/02
STEFFEN, SCOTT
2
dd :
03/15/02
STOCKTON, DERRELL
2
dd
03/15/02
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2,301.20
dd
03/15/02
WATCZAK, LAURA
2,245.82
dd
03/15/02
WENZEL, JAY
1,942.56
dd
03/15/02
XIONG, KAO
1,429.05
dd
03/15/02
BERGERON, JOSEPH
2,564.64
dd
03/15/02
GROTTY, KERRY
2,573.64
dd
03/15/02
DUNN, ALICE
2
Ad
03/15/02
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2,281.38
dd
03/15/02
EVERSON, PAUL
1,663.37
dd
03/15/02
FLOR, TIMOTHY
2,523.46
dd
03/15/02
FRASER, JOHN
2,328.15
dd
03/15/02
HALWEG, JODI
1,395.80
dd
03/15/02
MORNING, TIMOTHY
1,465.54
dd
03/15/02
PARSONS, KURT
1,581.54
dd
03/15/02
ROSSMAN, DAVID
2,202.34
dd
03/15/02
THIENES, PAUL
2,241.74
dd
03/15/02
GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE
2
dd
03/15/02
BOYER, SCOTT
1,674.16
dd
03/15/02
FEHR, JOSEPH
1,674.16
dd
03/15/02
FLAUGHER, JAYME
1,644.65
dd
.03/1 5/02
HOM, HEATHER
11 ) 781.30
. dd
03/15/02
LAFFERTY, WALTER
1,615.14
dd
03/15/02
LINN, BRYAN
1
dd
03/15/02
PACOLT, MARSHA
1
dd
03/15/02
RA.BINE, JANET
1,615.14
dd
03/15/02
STAHNKE, JULIE
1
dd
03/15/02
LUKIN, STEVEN
2,894.71
dd
:03/15/02
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
2
dd
03/15/02
ZWIEG, SUSAN
1,611.94
dd
03/15/02
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
260.67
AMOUNT
3,573.18
747.57
2,152.74
1,656.12
1,316.74
1,447.14
1,701.22
2,341.54
2,706.02
1,673.34
1,733.34
1,693.34
1,673.34
1,376.52
2,828.79
2,003.14
2,380.46
2,102.34
1,915.48
3,367.69
1,611.95
2,341.54
1,670.34
1,257.25
1,921.54
949.78
1,565.54
3,505.30
2,388.78
940.76
459.56
1.,331.94
573.74
1,175.94
1,805.38
1,799.48
2,353.84
2,230.34
2,508.26
497.00
267.38
1,617.74
41.63
1,529.14
1,208.32
84.00
10
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR
THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
dd
03/15/02
AHL, R. CHARLES
dd
03/15/02
NIVEN, AMY
dd
03/15/02
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
dd
03/15/02
WEGWERTH, JUDITH
dd
03/15/02
BRINK, TROY
dd
03/15/02
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
dd
03/15/02
EDGE, DOUGLAS
dd
03/15/02
KANE, MICHAEL
dd
03/15/02
LUNDSTEN, LANCE
dd
03/15/02
LUTZ, DAVID
dd
03/15/02
MEYER, GERALD
dd
03/15/02
NAGEL, BRYAN
dd
03/15/02
OSWALD, ERICK
dd
03/15/02
TEVLIN, TODD
dd
03/15/02
CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER
dd
03%15/02
DUCHARME, JOHN
dd
03/15/02
PECK, DENNIS
dd
03/15/02
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
dd
03/15/02
SCHACHT, ERIN.
dd
03/15/02
ANDERSON, BRUCE
dd
03/15/02
DOHERTY, KATHLEEN
dd
03/15/02
MARUSKA, MARK
dd
03/15/02
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
dd
03/15/02
GREW- HAYMAN, JANET
dd
03/15/02
HUTCHINSON, ANN
dd
03/15/02
NELSON, JEAN
dd
03/15/02
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
dd
03/15/02
COLEMAN, ME-LINDA
dd
03/15/02
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
dd
03/15/02
KROLL, LISA
dd
03/15/02
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE
dd
03/15/02
SINDT, ANDREA
dd
03/15/02
THOMPSON, DEBRA
dd
03/15/02
YOUNG, TAMELA
dd
03/15/02
BERG O, CHAD
dd
03/15/02
FINWALL, SHANN
dd
03/15/02
ROBERTS, KENNETH
dd
03/15/02
CARVER, NICHOLAS
dd
03/ 15/02
FISHER, DAVID
dd
03/15/02
ANZALDI, MANDY
dd
03/15/02
BJORK, BRANDON
dd
03/15/02
FINN, GREGORY
dd
03/15/02
FLUG, ELAINE
dd
03/15/02
GRAF, MICHAEL
dd
03/15/02
KELLY, LISA
dd
03/15/02
LUSHANKO, ADAM
AMOUNT
3,573.18
747.57
2,152.74
1,656.12
1,316.74
1,447.14
1,701.22
2,341.54
2,706.02
1,673.34
1,733.34
1,693.34
1,673.34
1,376.52
2,828.79
2,003.14
2,380.46
2,102.34
1,915.48
3,367.69
1,611.95
2,341.54
1,670.34
1,257.25
1,921.54
949.78
1,565.54
3,505.30
2,388.78
940.76
459.56
1.,331.94
573.74
1,175.94
1,805.38
1,799.48
2,353.84
2,230.34
2,508.26
497.00
267.38
1,617.74
41.63
1,529.14
1,208.32
84.00
10
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
11
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
03/15/02
MCBRIDE, PATRICK
80.00
dd
03/15/02
NIEMCZYK, BRIAN
160.00
dd
03/15/02
ROBBINS, AUDRA
1499.14
dd
03/15/02
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,357.46
dd
03115/02
WOODFORD, MATT
34.00
dd
03/15/02
BREHEIM, ROGER
1
.dd
03/15/02
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
2,031.98
dd
03/15/02
OTIS, MARY ELLEN
661.3 8
dd
03/15/02
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
1
dd
03/15/02
COLEMAN, PHILIP
398.29
dd
03/15/02
CROSSON, LINDA
1,950.34
dd
03/15/02
EASTMAN, THOMAS
2,277.54
dd
03/15/02
ERICKSON, KYLE
755.85
dd
03/15/02
HABLE, NATASHA
427.38
dd
03/15/02
HERSOM, HEIDI,
1,571.94
dd
03/15/02
MCCLUNG, HEATHER
781.79
dd
03/15/02
ROA, MILTON
232.90
dd
03/15/02
STAPLES, PAULINE
2,565.11
dd
03/15/02
ATKINS, KATHERINE
275.44
dd
03/15/02
BADEN, ALISON
306.86
dd
03/15/02
CORNER, AMY
60.30
dd
03/15/02
DEGRAW, KRYSTAL
410.13
dd
03/15/02
ERICKSON, CAROL
43.50
dd
03/15/02
GREENWALT, SARAH
469.48
dd
03/15/02
HASSENSTAB, DENISE
78.63
dd
03/15/02
HAWKINS, LISA
19.95
dd
03/15/02
HORWATH, RONALD
1499.14
dd
03/15/02
KOEHNEN, AMY
79.20
dd
03/15/02
NL RUSKA, ERICA
155.88
dd
03/15/02
WHITE, NICOLE
46.24
dd
03/15/02
WORWA, LINDSAY
368.00
dd
03/15/02
GROPPOLI, LINDA
346.43
dd
03/15/02
RENSLOW, RITA
80.94
dd
03/15/02
LONETTI, JAMES
825.23
dd
03/15/02
PRINS, KELLY
785.35
dd
03/15/02
REILLY, MICHAEL
1
dd
03/15/02
STEINHORST, JEFFREY
21.70
dd
03/15/02
AICHELE, CRAIG
1,494.34
dd
03/15/02
HURLEY, STEPHEN
2,509.08
wf
57079
03/01/02
MEEHAN, JAMES
30
wf
88137
03/15/02
CARDINAL, ROBERT
406.20
wf
88138
03/15/02
WASILUK, JULIE
357.47
wf
88139
03/15/02
INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS
118.75
wf
88140
03/15/02
JAHN, DAVID
1
wf
88141
03/15/02
MORIN, TROY
156.00
wf
88142
03/15/02
GENNOW, PAMELA
312.50
11
CITY OF MAPLEwOOI)
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
12
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
88143
03/15/02
MATHEYS, ALANA
1,741.94
wf
88144
03/15/02
HANSEN, LORI
1,396.74
wf
88145
03/15/02
VIETOR, LORRAINE
1,580.65
wf
88146
03/15/02
PALANK, MARY
1,498.34
wf
88147
03/15/02
RICHIE, CAROLE
L599.02
wf
881.48
03/15/02
SVENDSEN, JOANNE
1
wf
88149
03/15/02
TICHY, PAMELA
84.00
wf
88150
03/15/02
HALEY, BRANDON
1,500.58
wf
88151
03/15/02
STEINER, JOSEPH
180.00
wf
88152
03/15/02
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2,222.35
wf
88153
03/15/02
BARTZ, PAUL
2
.wf
88154
03/15/02
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
2
wf
88155
03/ 15/02
CUDE, LARRY
418.59
wf
88156
03/15/02
FREBERG, RONALD
1,703.14
wf
88157
03/15/02
JONES, DONALD
1
wf
88158
03/15/02
ELIAS, JAMES
2,143.94
wf
88159
03/15/02
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,003.14
wf
88160
03/15/02
EDSON, DAVID
1,699.14
wf
88161
03/15/02
HELEY, ROLAND
1
wf
88162
03/15/02
HINNENKAMP, GARY
L695.18
wf
88163
03/15/02
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1,670.34
wf
88164
03/15/02
NAUGHTON, JOHN
1
wf
88165
03/15/02
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,447.14
wf
88166
03/15/02
BERGREN, KIRSTEN
22.00
wf
88167
03/15/02
GERNES, CAROLE
375.00
wf
88168
03/15/02
SOUTTER, CHRISTINE
317.25
wf
88169
03/15/02
WORDEN, KRISTEN
17.25
wf
88170
03/15/02
BUNCE, LARRY
1,705.54
wf
88171
03/15/02
WENGER, ROBERT
2
wf
88172
03/15/02
ANDERSEN, ERIC
31.50
wf
88173
03/15/02
ANDERSON, MIKE
63.00
wf
88174
03/15/02
BANICK, STEVE
63.00
wf
88175
03/15/02
CHRISTIANSON, SARA
152.00
wf
88176.
03/15/02
FITCH, CYNTHIA
30.75
wf
88177
03/15/02
FLUG, MEGAN
94.88
wf
88178
03/15/02
FRANK, LAURA
323.00
wf
88179
03/15/02
FRANK, SARAH
19.50
wf
88180
03/15/02
GLASS, DANIEL
33.00
wf
88181
03/15/02
GORE, MICHAEL
73.50
wf
88182
03/15/02
GOULET, NICOLE
3 8.5 0
wf
88183
03/15/02
HARGROVE, CAYLA
56.25
wf
88184
03/15/02
HELKAMP, KAYLA
13.00
wf
$8185
03/15/02
HOLDER, RYAN
46.00
wf
-88186
03/15/02
HORNER, JAY
83.50
wf
88187
03/15/02
HORNER, KIMBERLY
26.00
wf
88188
03/15/02
JAWORSKI, ERIC
42.00
12
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE
GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #
CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
88189
03/15/02
JOHNSON, SARA
63.50
wf
88190
03/15/02
KINKING, KATIE
21.00
wf
88191
03/15/02
KLEM, JOSH
60.00
wf
88192
03/15/02
KRIER, JOHN
44.00
wf
88193
03/15/02
LANDS, JOSEPH
21.75
wf
88194
03/15/02
LIUKONEN, SHAWN
32.25
wf
88195
03/15/02
MANTALICA, LUKE
132.00
wf
88196
03/15/02
MARTINUCCI, ERIN
45.00
wf
88,197
03/15/02
MARTINUCCI, KAITLIN
39.00
wf
88198
03/15/02
MICK, KYLE
43.00
wf
88199
03/15/02
NIELSEN, ABBY
20.50
wf
88200
03/15/02
NIELSEN, ADAM
47.25
wf
88201
03/15/02
NIEMCZYK, ANTHONY
84.00
wf
88202
03/15/02
O'GRADY, BENJAMIN
50.75
wf
88203
03/15/02
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
341.00
wf
88204
03/15/02
RAYE, HOLLY
45.50
wf
88205
03/15/02
REICHLING, DANIEL
28.00
wf
88206
03/15/02
ROERING, JORDAN
64.50
wf
88207
03/15/02
RYDEL, RACHEL
26.00
wf
88208
03/15/02
SCHULTE, DANIEL
164.00
wf
88209
03/15/02
SHADE II, JOHN
48.00
wf
88210
03/15/02
SHOBERG, KARI
39.38
wf
88211
03/15/02
SIKORA, JACOB
105.00
wf
88212
03/15/02
SPENCER, WILLIAM
45.00
wf
88213
03/15/02
WALSH, JESSICA
28.00
wf
88214
03/15/02
WESTBROCK, REBECCA
68.00
wf
88215
03/15/02
YORKOVICH, BRADLEY
40.50
wf
88216
03/15/02
GERMAIN, DAVID
1,724.18
wf
88217
03/15/02
HAAG, MARK
1,510.64
wf
88218
03/15/02
NADEAU, EDWARD
2,341.54
wf
88219
03/15/02
FUDGE, SUSAN
119.00
wf
88220
03/15/02
GLASS, JEAN
1
wf
88221
03/15/02
HOIUM, SHEILA
970.50
wf
88222
03/15/02
MOY, PAMELA
327.73
wf
88223
03/15/02
NICHOLS, DANIELLE
25.45
wf
88224
03/15/02
PARTLOW, JOSHUA
251.60
wf
88225
03/15/02
SANTIAGO -SOLA, JESSICA
292.40
wf
88226
03/15/02
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
1,503.14
wf
88227
03/15/02
SHOBERG, CARY
625.48
wf
88228
03/15/02
TOLBERT, FRANCINE
81.60
wf
88229
03/15/02
UNGER, MARGARET
685.00
wf
88230
03/15/02
VELASQUEZ, ANGELA
337.91
wf
-88231
03/15/02
BACHMAN, NICOLE
208.93
wf
88232
03/15/02
BRENEMAN, NEIL
179.29
wf
88233
03/15/02
CHAPMAN, JENNY
368.51
wf
88234
03/15/02
CMIEL, NICHOLAS
15.53
13
CITY OF AU' LEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
14
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
88235
03/15/02
COSTA, JOSEPH
205.80
wf
88236
03/15/02
DEMPSEY, BETH
124.30
wf
88237
03/15/02
DIERICH, ANDREA
66.63
wf
88238
03/15/02
DUNN, RYAN
2 51.8 8
wf
88239
03/15/02
FALKENSTEIN, MONICA
36.00
wf
88240
03/15/02
FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA
40.20
wf
88241
03/15/02
FONTAINE, ANTHONY
16.99
wf
88242
03/15/02
FONTAINE, KIM
262.35
wf
88243
03/15/02
GRUENHAGEN, LINDA
226.05
wf
88244
03/15/02
GUZIK, JENNIFER
29.25
wf
88245
03/15/02
HEINN, REBECCA
172.34
wf
88246
03/15/02
HEXUM, AMANDA
56.00
wf
88247
03/15/02
HOLMGREN, LEAH
114.90
wf
88248
03/15/02
HOULE, DENISE
140.35
wf
88249
03/15/02
IRISH, KART.
153.46
wf. .
88250
03/15/02
JOHNSON, ROBERT
285.13
wf
88251
03/15/02
JOVONOVICH, TODD
53.65
wf
88252
03/15/02
JOYER, MARTI
127.63
wf
88253
03/15/02
KERSCHNER, JOLENE
238.50
wf
88254
.03/15/02
KOEHNEN, MARY
456.61
wf
88255
03/15/02
. KROLL, MARK
113.60
wf
88256
03/15/02
. KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
327.06
wf
88257
03/15/02
MCMAHON, MELISSA
145.11
wf
88258
03/15/02
MILLS, ANNE
31.51
wf
88259
03/15/02
MOSSONG, ANDREA
476.01
wf
88260
03/15/02
O'REAGAN, CHRISTINE
89.00
wf
88261
03/15/02
OLSON, MARGRET
208.00
wf
88262
03/15/02
PEHOSKI, JOEL
169.20
wf
88263
03/15/02
RENSTROM, KEVIN
153.92
wf
88264
03/15/02
SCHAEFER, ROB
73.64
wf
88265
03/15/02
SIMONSON, JUSTIN
-- 244:51
wf
88266
03/15/02
SMITLEY, SHARON
284.00
wf
88267
03/15/02
THUNSTROM, JUSTIN
191.75
wf
88268
03/15/02
TUPY, HEIDE
36.00
wf
88269
03/15/02
TUPY, MARCUS
170.00
wf
88270
03/15/02
WARNER, CAROLYN
172.80
wf
88271
03/15/02
WEDES, CARYL
140.70
wf
88272
03/15/02
WOODMAN, ALICE
200.95
wf
88273
03/15/02
BOSLEY, CAROL
289.78
wf
88274
03/15/02
ESALA, HOPE
21.00
wf
88275
03/15/02
EVEGAN, LAVITTA
291.00
wf
88276
03/15/02
HAGLUND, BRIAN
241.50
wf
88277
03/15/02
HANSEN, ANNA
54.00
wf
88278
03/15/02
HUPPERT, ERICA
483.14
wf
88279
03/15/02
KONECZNY, JENNA
57.38
wf
88280
03/15/02
KURKOSKI, STEPHANIE
33.00
14
Wf
Wf
Wf
Wf
Wf
Wf
wf
Wf
Wf
Wf
wf
Wf
Wf
Wf
Wf
Wf
Wf
Wf
wf
Wf
wf
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
88281
03/15/02
88282
03/15/02
88283
03/15/02
88284
03/15/02
88285
03/15/02
88286
03/15/02
88287
03/15/02
88288
03/15/02
88289
03/15/02
88290
03/15/02
88291
03/15/02
88292
03/15/02
88293
03/15/02
88294
03/15/02
88295
03/15/02.
88296
03/15/02
88297
03/15/02
88298
03/15/02
88299
03/15/02
88300
03/15/02
88301
03/15/02
EMPLOYEE NAME
SCHROEDER, KATHLEEN
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
BEHAN, JAMES
DEGREE, AMANDA
DIXON, NICOLE
DOUGLASS, TOM
HEGG, MICHELLE
HERRON, MICHELLE
KOSKI, JOHN
KYRK, ASHLEY
LESLIE, DUSTIN
PATTERSON, ALBERT
PETERSON, LYNDSAY
RISTOW, JONATHAN
SCHMIDT, WILLIAM
SCHULZE, BRIAN
SEVERSON, HOLLY
YOUNG, MATTHEW
ZIEMER, NICOLE
MULVANEY, DENNIS
PRIEM, STEVEN
423.15
26.16
1,459.95
116.00
144.10
641.75
214.51
114.30
1,097.54
36.25
137.00
837.71
39.90
93.10
239.40
230.80
85.80
198.15
78.60
1,845.54
1,700.58
390,991.87
15
Agenda # v "
MEMORANDUM Action by Council
TO: City Manager Date
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner��iorsed
SUBJECT: Planning Commission's 2001 Annual Report
oded
DATE: March 5, 2002
Rejected
INTRODUCTION
The city code requires that the planning commission prepare an annual report to the city council by
their second meeting in February. This report should include the planning commission's activities from
the past year and the major projects for the new year. The planning commission recommended
approval of this report on March 4, 2002.
ACTIVITIES
The commission considered the following in:
In 2001, the commission also worked on the comprehensive plan update and took a tour of
development sites.
2001 LAND USE PLAN CHANGES
The commission considered three changes to the 16nd use plan in 2001.
Changes PC Action Council Action
Afton Ridge Approved Approved
(Lower Afton and McKnight Roads)
From BC -M and LBC to
R -311 (residential high - density)
This change was fora 40-unit townhouse development that is now under construction.
5 -8 Club (Beau's) Approved Approved
(2289 Minnehaha Avenue)
From R -1 (single dwellings) to BGM
(business commercial modified)
This change was for the remodeling and expansion of a nonconforming existing restaurant.
2001
2000
1999
changes to the land use plan
3
5
7
changes to the zoning map
2
2
1
preliminary plats
3
6
2
ordinance changes
5
3
2
conditional use permits and revisions
25
21
21
vacations
7
0
5
variances
2
7
3
miscellaneous requests
7
6
11
In 2001, the commission also worked on the comprehensive plan update and took a tour of
development sites.
2001 LAND USE PLAN CHANGES
The commission considered three changes to the 16nd use plan in 2001.
Changes PC Action Council Action
Afton Ridge Approved Approved
(Lower Afton and McKnight Roads)
From BC -M and LBC to
R -311 (residential high - density)
This change was fora 40-unit townhouse development that is now under construction.
5 -8 Club (Beau's) Approved Approved
(2289 Minnehaha Avenue)
From R -1 (single dwellings) to BGM
(business commercial modified)
This change was for the remodeling and expansion of a nonconforming existing restaurant.
Carefree Villas Denied Approved
(Gervais Avenue)
From R -1 (single dwellings) to
R -3H (residential high - density)
This change was fora 12 -unit expansion of the Carefree Cottages on Gervais Avenue.
2001 ZONING MAP CHANGES
The commission considered two changes to the zoning map in 2001.
Change PC Action Council Action
Afton Rid Approved Approved
(Lower Afton and McKnight Roads)
From CO and LBC to
R-3 (multiple - family residential)
This change was fora 40 -unit townhouse development that is now under construction.
5-8 Club (Beau's) Approved Approved
(2289 Minnehaha Avenue)
From R -1 (single dwellings) to BGM
(business commercial modified)
This change was for the remodeling and expansion of a nonconforming existing restaurant.
2001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND REVISIONS
The commission considered the following conditional use permits and permit revisions in 2001.
PC Action Council Action
Jehovah's Witness Kingdom Hall Revision Approved Approved
(925 Century Avenue North)
Lot Division Approved Approved
(1101 County Road C)
Rice /Roselawn Auto Sales Approved Approved
(1908 Rice Street)
Beaver Lake Townhomes PUD Denied Tabled
(Lakewood Drive and Maryland Avenue)
Maplewood Imports Addition /Revision Approved Approved
(2780 Maplewood Drive)
University Auto Sales Approved Approved
(1145 Highway 36)
0
AT &T Monopole
Approved
Approved
(1681 Cope Avenue)
Little School of Montessori
Approved
Approved
(1945 Prosperity Road)
The Gardens PUD
Approved
Approved
(Summer Lane, east of McMenemy Street)
Afton Ridge
Approved
Approved
(Lowr Afton and McKnight Roads)
Maplewood Auto Center
Approved
Approved
(2525 White Bear Avenue)
Schlomka Landscaping
Approved
Approved
(2511 Carver Avenue)
Alamo Car Rental
Approved
Approved
(2525 White Bear Avenue)
5 -8 Club (Beau's)
Approved
Approved
(2289 Minnehaha Avenue)
Sobriety High School
Approved
Approved
(2055 White Bear Avenue)
Salvation Army Church Addition /Revision
Approved
Approved
(2080 Woodlynn Avenue)
Sinclair Station Remodeling
Approved
Approved
(2158 Rice Street)
Maplewood Toyota Expansion
Approved
Approved
(2783 and 2889 Maplewood Drive)
Hill- Murray School Addition /Revision
Approved
Approved
(2625 Larpenteur Avenue)
Ramsey County Productive Day Golf Course
Approved
Approved
(Century Avenue and Lower Afton Road)
Saint Paul Water Services Plant Revision
Approved
Approved
(1900 Rice Street)
Carefree Villas PUD
Denied
Approved
(Gervais Avenue)
3
MEMBER WHO RESIGNED IN 2001
Jack Frost (12- 10 -01)
MEMBERS WHO WERE APPOINTED IN 2001
None
2001 ATTENDANCE
Name -
Appointed
Term Expires
2001 Attendance
Lorraine Fischer
1970
12 -04
18 out of 18
Jack Frost
12 -10 -90
Resigned
14 out of 18
Gary Pearson
12 -10 -90
12 -02
16 out of 18
William Rossbach
10 -10 -89
12 -02
16 out of 18
Eric Ahiness
12 -11 -00
12 -04
16 out of 18
Matt Ledvina
12 -08 -97
12 -04
13 out of 18
Dale Trippler
6 -8 -98
12 -03
16 out of 18
Paul Mueller
7 -13 -98
12 -03
15 out of 18
Mary Dierich
12 -11 -00
12 -03
15 out of 18
As a point of comparison, the planning commission had 17 meetings in 1999 and 18 meetings in 2000.
2002 ACTIVITIES
The following are the possible activities of the planning commission for 2002:
1. Have an annual tour of development and other sites of interest.
2. Have quarterly in- service training sessions or materials for the planning commission.
3. Have information (including'maps) about the comprehensive Ian and have p p commissioners available
at the annual open house.
4. Work with the consultants and city staff on any code or land use Ian Chan es that result from
Hillcrest Area study.
p g m the
5. Provide input to HRA on housing redevelopment and program issues.
6. Study the area west of Maplewood Mail (including the Hajicek property) for land use and
transportation issues.
7. Review the city's overall land use plan map for possible changes.
8. Review the PUD ordinance for possible changes.
P:1..lmisce1WC 2001 annrep.doc
4
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MARCH 4, 2002
a. 2001 Annual Report
Mr. Roberts pointed out the changes and additions he made to the 2001 Annual Report from the
last meeting.
Commissioner Trippler said he has to express a lot of frustration of having to go through the
Planning Commission 2001 Annual Report once again. He thought if staff could have taken the
minutes from the meeting and gone through them it would have pointed out what some of the
commission members had asked for. The chairperson had asked for a numeration of the vote
count for the planning commission and the city council to see if the counts were close or not.
Commisisoner Trippler said there was also a request that if the planning commission approved
something and the city council made changes to the planning commission recommendations or did
not accept changes that the planning commission had asked for, that should be reflected in the
notes. In many of the cases it looks like it is an even approval for both sides and in many cases it
is not like that at all. There is discussion and issues and it makes the years efforts look very
vanilla. He thought the issues that planning commission members raised are all in the minutes but
they did not show up once again in the 2001 Annual Report and he cannot understand why.
Mr. Roberts said the reason they are not is because Melinda Coleman said it was not necessary.
There is too much staff time spent and the Annual Report would become about 9 pages long. It
was her opinion and staffs opinion that members get very lengthy minutes and they get council
reports from planning commission members on each council meeting and members have those
items to reflect back on over the past year. The annual report is to be a summary and not a blow -
by -blow account of everything that has been done. That is what the minutes are for. To go
through and label each vote, Ms. Coleman felt it wasn't necessary.
Chairperson Rossbach commented that as far as the conditional use permits he would tend to
agree with staff and Ms. Coleman. He thought about it a little bit and he thought maybe this is one
area that commission members are asking staff to do something when maybe commission
members are not doing such a good job of it themselves. He knows that there is a representative
that goes to the city council meetings and reports back to members at the next meeting but he
forgets to bring his notes to refer back to them when he has to report back to members about what
was discussed. He thought about it and he thinks maybe commission members need to do a little
betterjob of referring back to the minutes. He did comment to Mr. Trippler that the minutes are in
the public domain and is it really necessary that the comments be put back into the annual report
again if during the course of the year members kept a book of the minutes of the year?
Commissioner Trippler said all of the issues that he raised were just issues that were brought up
by members of the planning commission. He is not saying that he agrees or disagrees with them it
seemed to him that the staff is supposed to be supporting the planning commission and if
members ask staff to do something he expects that they will follow through. He doesn't know if the
annual report would be used by anybody else other than planning commission members but he
thinks if the planning commission is going to have an annual report it seemed to him that it really
oughtto provide some level of information that is helpful to people. What is provided in the annual
report is very brief. It tells him that there was only one item that the planning commission denied
that the city council approved over the commission's denial. So it looks like both the planning
commission and the city council are in harmony. When he thinks about issues that took place over
the year, there is not a lot of disagreement but there is a level of disagreement that is not being
reflected in the report.
Commissioner Pearson said he was one of the members that had asked for more information.
What he had in mind was that after the approved or denied section in the land use plan changes
that staff put a 5 to 3 vote (for example) after each item. Not that there be a long drawn out
explanation of it, but just the vote split. It is not a crushing issue to him but rather it would have
been helpful and informative.
Commissioner Mueller said he teaches at a university so he gives students a little bit of information
and if they want to find out more than they need to do that. He thinks that this is what the minutes
are for this report is just a summary. He doesn't know what the definition of an annual report is but
this report gives him enough information.
Chairperson Rossbach said he had a comment in regards to what Mr. Trippler said regarding the
staff supporting the planning commission. Yes they do support the planning commission but they
only support the commission as far as the city council tells them to. He asked staff if it is
necessary that members accept or deny the annual report or ask staff to do more with it?
Mr. Roberts said he needs an action one -way or the other.
Commissioner Pearson moved to approve the planning commission's 2001 Annual Report.
Commissioner Mueller seconded. Ayes — Dierich, Mueller, Pearson, Rossbach, Trippler
Abstention -- Ledvina
Commissioner Ledvina commented that the reason he voted with an abstention is that he believes
that the planning commission should review land use issues associated with the Carver Ridge
neighborhood and that is the reason he abstended. This item can be discussed with the city
council when they review the annual report at the meeting.
Chairperson Rossbach replied, so noted.
AGENDA NO.
�a
Action by Council
Date
AGENDA REPORT Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
e
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director Aga44-ol�
RE: Transfer to Close Fund for Lift Station No. 9 Project
DATE: March 15, 2002
The Council recently approved the final payment to the contractor for the Lift
Station No. 9 Project. The surplus balance in the fund for the project needs to be
transferred to the Sewer Fund which provided the money for the project. This
requires Council authorization.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to transfer $78,994.59
from the Lift Station No. 9 Project fund to the Sewer Fund and to process the
appropriate budget changes.
P \agn \lift station no. 9.DOC
AGENDA NO � y
Action by Councia
Date
AGENDA REPORT �
Mvdifieci
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director �I
RE: Transfer for 2001 Bond Issue
DATE: March 15, 2002
On October 4 the Council awarded bids on the sale of Refunding Bonds to
refinance the 1992 Refunding Bonds. The 1992 bonds have now been called
and redeemed. In order to complete the refinancing process, money needs to be
transferred from the debt service(#und for the 2001 Refunding Bonds to the debt
service fund for the 1992 Refunding Bonds as planned. This requires Council
authorization.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to transfer $844,762.35
from the debt service fund for the 20 Refunding Bonds to the debt service fund
for the 1992 Refunding Bonds.
P \agn \1992bonds.DOC
AGENDA NO.
TO: City Manager
AGENDA REPORT
FROM: Finance Director k02
A ction by Council
Date
Endo
MO&
RE: Transfer to Close Debt Service Fund for 1992 Tax Increment
Bonds
DATE: March 15, 2002
The final principal and interest payments have been made on the 1992 Tax
Increment Bonds. The current balance in the debt service fund for this bond
issue is $11,109.18. According to State law (MSA 475.61, Subd. 4), any surplus
remaining in a debt service fund after the bonds and interest have been paid may
be appropriated to any other general purpose. Since tax levy limits are in effect,
the surplus should be transferred to the General Fund to ease the burden of
balancing the 2003 Budget.
Therefore, it is recommended that the Council authorize staff to transfer
$11,109.18 from the debt service fund for the 1992 Tax Increment Bonds to the
General Fund and approve the appropriate budget changes.
P \agn \1992 tax increment bonds.doc
PAFINANCE \WORD\AGN \1992 TAX INCREMENT BONDS.DOC
AGEND HIM NOmljm�
AGENDA REPORT A
Date .._,. __
To City Manager Richard Fursman Endorsed
From: Chief Donald Winger er. IoMied
Subject: Purchase of 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe Re
Date:- March 14, 2002
Introduction
The Police Department is requesting permission to purchase a 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Background
The Police Department has budgeted money to purchase a four - wheel -drive 2002
Chevrolet Tahoe. It would be used as a supervisor's vehicle and would replace a 1995
Chevrolet Blazer.
This vehicle would be purchased under the state contract price of $27,493.
Recommendation
It is recommended that permission be granted to purchase the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Action Regui=
Submit to the City Council for review and approval.
DSW:js
AGENDA. ITEM
low&
AGENDA REPORT
Acts
Date s....r.:.. _ -
To. City Manager Richard F rsm n
Endorsed
From: Chief Donald Winger ,
Mod
Subject: Law Enforcement Block Grant Expenditure Account
Rejected
Date. March 14, 2002
Introduction
The Police Department is requesting City Council authorization for a Law Enforcement
Block Grant Expenditure Account in the 2002 Police Department Operating Budget,
g g
Background
Due to an administrative oversight during the 2001 year -end rollover, a Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant ( LLEBG) Expenditure Account was not .included in the Police
Department's 2002 Budget. City Council approval is required to establish such
accounts.
At the end of 2001, the Maplewood Police Department had $11,700 remaining in
LLEBG funds received in 2001. The grant has a term of three years, and these funds
were intentionally retained for expenditure in 2002.
The terms of the grant are as follows:
► Funds must either be used for authorized expenditures or returned to the
federal government.
► Funds cannot be used to reduce, supplant or replace funds from the
department's municipal budget.
► The remaining funds were authorized specifically for the purchase of police
equipment.
■ )wwwwww.��w..w.�
It is recommended that the City Council authorize an Expenditure Account for Law
Enforcement Block Grant funds in the Police Department's 2002 Annual Budget.
Action Requi_ red
Submit to the City Council for review and approval.
DSW:js
AGENDAnEMNO.
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Col..
To: City Manager Richard Fursman
Date--. --
From: Chief Donald g
Win er 47i dorsed
Subject: Maplewood Courthouse odified
Date: March 18 2002 Rejected
Introduction
At present, research is being conducted to investigate the possible closing of the
Maplewood Courthouse located at 2785 'White Bear Avenue and move all cases to the
Ramsey County Courthouse in downtown St. Paul.
Background
The Maplewood Courthouse has served the suburban law enforcement community and
residents of suburban Ramsey County in an exemplary manner for many years
Closing this facility would increase travel time for suburban law enforcement personnel,
increase time delays due to parking constraints in downtown St. Paul, and be a burden
to the citizens who must respond to court.
Budget Impact
This move would decrease police officer resources and increase overtime costs for
Maplewood police officers and all suburban law enforcement officers.
Recommendation
It is recommended the City Council provide a resolution to Chief Judge James Mott and
Chairman Jim McDonough of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners supporting
the Maplewood Court or another court in suburban Ramsey County. - --
Action Regui=
Submit to City. Council for approval and signature of attached resolution.
DSW: js
Resolution Supporting the. Retention. of the Suburban Court
Located in Maplewood or Another Ramsey County Suburban Location
WHEREAS the .Maplewood .Court provides excellent service to the, law enforcement
community and the citizens of Ramsey County; and
WHEREAS the Maplewood Court provides convenience and adequate parking. for the
,
law enforcement community and residents of Ramsey County; and
WHEREAS consolidation of all court services to downtown St. Paul would impact all
suburban law enforcement officers and the citizens we serve; and
WHEREAS the consolidation of all court services to downtown St. Paul would have an
adverse impact on suburban police budgets and staffing levels;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council supports the
retention of a suburban court in Maplewood or another Ramsey County suburban
community.
LET IT ALSO BE RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council recognizes the security
and facilities issues that need to be corrected, and support is offered to correct those
deficiencies.
K elly &
PeA9
A T T O R N.E.Y S A T L A W
.2350 US. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MN 5 5101
PATRICK J. KELLY Of Counsel:
SONG LO FAWCETT
CHAD D. LEMMONS MCGUIGAN & HOLLY, P.L.C.
ROBERT J. FOWLER (651) 224 -3781
.. J. SONSALLA Facsimile (651) 223 -8019
DAVID L. PALM
E -Mail: admin@KellyandFawcett.com
March 13, 2002 l
�.+ �.
Mr. Richard Fursman ~
City Administrator
2002
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B MAP
M
WOOD
aplewood, MN 55109
POU
RE: Courthouse
Dear Mr. Fursman:
Please be advised that there are memos going out to the suburban prosecutors with respect to the
closing of the Maplewood Courthouse. The following information was obtained.
"All suburban cases, with the possible exception .of court trials, would be moved
to the Courthouse in downtown St. Paul. Ahearing officer and a TVB presence
might be maintained in Maplewood."
Ap there was no ana of the costs and no analysis of the log isti c s. Upon information
pp Y Y Y g p
and belief, Judge Bastian made a Motion to obtain the aforementioned information before.
making any decisions. The Motion failed for lack of a second. Subsequently., a Motion passed
instructing Judge Mott to schedule a meeting with representatives of the suburban communities.
A Memo is being circulated among the prosecutors that states as follows:
"If you think this action should not take place, you should have your elected
officials, city managers, police chiefs and residents contacting the Board of
Commissioners immediately. I would also suggest being in touch with your local
legislators.
Any letters should be written to Jim McDonough, Chairman of the Ramsey
County Board of Commissioners,• with copies to other commissioners."
Memorandum
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Richard Fursman
Date: 3/15/2002
Re: International City Management Exchange
A
l4Ctitm by Council
air 4mrsed
Monte d
Agenda No
AGENDA REPORT
C __ 14
DATE: March 12, 2002
by Comcil
TO: Richard Fursman
�
City .Manager
Modified
FROM: Sherrie Le�'�
Rejected
Human Resource Director
SUBJECT: Public Safety Communications Supervisor
Last year, the City Council approved the establishment of the non -union job class of
Public Safety Communications Supervisor, along with specific pay and benefits. At
that time we did not know whether this position would remain anon -union position
so established the benefits consistent with the Metro Supervisory Association
agreement.
As this position has remained non - union, I am requesting that the benefits associated
with this position be revised to be equal to the benefits associated with other full-
time non -union positions. In addition, I am requesting that the City contribution to
deferred compensation be adjusted retroactively to the incumbents date of hire.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt this change in benefits for the Public
Safety Communications Supervisor with the City contribution to deferred
compensation being retroactive to August 27, 2001.
C: Chief Steve Lulcin
Chief Don Winger
Marsha Pacolt
Payroll
Agenda Item G
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
0 0
DATE: March 18, 2002
RE: - Temporary License Approval - Temporary Gambling
Introduction
Action by Council
?ate
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
James Wilson has applied for a temporary gambling license for the Church of Presentation of the
Blessed Virgin Mary. They will be conducting bingo and pull tabs for their annuals spring festival
p g
that will be held at the church located at 1725 Kennard Street, on May 4 from 11:30 a.m. to 8:00
p.m. and on May 5 from 11:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Recommendation
It is recommended that Council approve the temporary gambling request.
Agenda #' :
Action by Council
MEMORANDUM
Dow
TO: City Manager ed
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Modified
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review �,1��
PROJECT: HiQcrest Animal Hospital �
LOCATION: Southwest Comer of Highway 61 and County Road D (1320 County Road D)
DATE: March 13, 2002
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Dr. Jennifer Bouthilet, representing the Hillcrest Animal Hospital, is proposing '
,p � p p g to build a 7,000
square-foot animal hospital at the southwest corner of Highway 61 and Count Road D. Refer to
the maps on pages 6 -10. This proposal includes Y
p p des constructing a new animal hospital to replace
the current animal hospital and a former house on the site. Specifically, the
demolished a house. on the owners recently
e property, will construct the new hospital (if approved), and then will
demolish the existing hospital after completing the new hospital.
The proposed building would be constructed of decorative rock -faced block
and stucco and would
have asphalt shingles. Refer to the building elevations on a es 11 and 12 '
p g and the project plans.
Requests
The applicant is requesting approval of the following:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) to build the new building closer than 350 feet to a residential
zoning district. The nearest residential district is immediately to the west of the site. The
proposed building would be 229 feet from the west property line of the site.
2. Approval of site, landscape and architectural plans.
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
The intent of the code, which requires a CUP for buildings closer than 350 fee
district is to eve g t to a residential
g the city an opportunity to review proposals and to require additional buffering o
protect homeowners. The existing nimal hospital is a g
9 p legal nonconforming use since it has been
operating from this site since the 1940's. In addition, the new animal hospital would
improvement over • - p uId be an
�m
p he existing facility as it would be 124 feet further from the residential district to
the west.
The proposed building also would be 300 feet from the nearest house to the
west. The proposed
future addition would be 256 feet from this house. The city may want to consider
operation, � Y y der methods like
hours of o
p n, screening and light -glare control to protect the nearby residents from
disturbances.
Engineering Department Comments
Chris Cavett, the Assistant City Engineer, did a review of the proposed drainage /storm water and
grading and erosion control plans. His comments are on pages 15 and 15. He has many concerns
with the proposed plans and will be requiring many changes to the plans before the city will issue a
grading permit or a building, permit for the project.
An issue that needs to be resolved with this request is that of water to serve the property. The city
council ordered a feasibility study to determine where and how to serve this property and the area
with water. The city and the owner will need to agree to a plan for providing water to site before
the city issues a building permit for the new animal hospital.
Lot Combination
The proposed site now has two separate lots. The former house was on one parcel and the
existing animal hospital is on the other parcel. The city should require the owner to combine the
two parcels into one property as a condition of approval of this project.
Design Review Comments
Building Design
The proposed building would be attractive and would have decorative rock -faced block, stucco and
asphalt shingles. The proposed colors are brown, cream and beige. As proposed, the building
would fit the character of this highway - frontage business location.
The proposed site plan shows a future addition on the west side of the hospital building. The
location of the addition should not cause any problems. In fact, the proposed future addition would
be farther east than the existing animal hospital. The design of the addition, however, should be
reviewed by the city before the city approves a building permit for the addition.
Landscaping
The proposed landscaping west of the parking lot and driveway is a good start, but the owner
should develop this plan further. (See the plans on pages 8 and 9). The city code requires that the
developer screen the parking lot from the home to the west by a six - foot -tall, 80 percent opaque
screen. The owner may accomplish this screening by berming, fencing, plantings or a combination
of these. As proposed, the plan does not meet the code requirement for screening. As such, the
applicant should expand the landscape plan to meet this code requirement. If the applicant wants
to use trees to meet the screening requirement, the trees should include six- foot -tall Austrian
Pines, Black Hills Spruce or a combination of these or other similar species of trees.
The applicant has not proposed any plantings on the north or east sides of the building. In
addition, the proposed plans show a dog run on the north side of the building. The applicant
should further develop the landscape plan for these parts of the site by adding no- maintenance
plantings on the north and east sides of the building. These plantings also should include
provisions for screening the dog run from views to the north and west with opaque fencing or
trees. There is a house on the Sparkle Auto property to the south. The city code, however, does
not require screening on this side of the site since the city has planned and zoned this property
light manufacturing.
r
Site Lights
The applicant should provide a lighting plan indicating the light spread and fixture design. The
lighting code requires a plan when near homes. The fixtures installed should be a design that hides
the bulb and lens from view. to avoid nuisances.
Fire Marshals Comments
1. The applicant should place a fire hydrant at the driveway and County Road D.
2. A sprinkler system is required.
Other Comments
The Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed District had no comment about this proposal. The
Maplewood Police department did not note any public safety concerns with this proposal. They also
noted that it is desirable that the applicant would remove the steep driveway on the east side of the
site to County Road D.
COMMISSION ACTIONS
On March 4, 2002, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit.
On March 12, 2002, the CDRB recommended approval of the design plans for this project.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 17 and 18. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to
build a new animal hospital that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district at 1320
County Road D. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the ordinance and
subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes. This approval also includes the proposed future
addition shown on the west side of the new hospital.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or
the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The owner shall combine the two properties into one parcel for tax and identification purposes
before the city issues a building permit.
5. The city and the owner shall agree to a plan for providing water to the site before the city
issues a building permit for the new hospital.
6. There shall not be any outdoor storage unless the city council approves a conditional use
permit for outdoor storage.
7. The applicant meeting all the conditions and plan changes required by the city engineer.
B. Approve the plans date - stamped February 12, 2002 for the proposed Hillcrest Animal Hospital at
1320 County Road D. The owner shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has. not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit:
a. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. The plans shall meet all the
requirements of the city engineer. The utility plans shall provide a fire hydrant where the
new driveway of the hospital meets County Road D.
b. A site lighting plan showing the light spread and fixture design. The light fixtures must
have concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield glare from the residents.
3. Submit revised plans for CDRB approval as follows:
a. The landscape plan shall include additional landscaping on the north and the east sides of
the building (especially in front of the dog run) and the code - required screening on the west
side of the parking lot and driveway.
b. The retaining wall plan shall include the retaining wall shown with a minimum of a two -foot
step or breaking in tiers with landscaping located above the tiers. Any wall that is more than
four feet tall requires a building permit issued by the city.
4. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Restore. and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Install a handicap- parking sign for the handicap- parking space.
c. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas.
d. Stripe all customer parking spaces at a width of 9 2 feet and the employee spaces at 9
feet.
5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The
amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter,
or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work.
6. Signs are not part of this approval. The applicant shall apply for sign permits with staff.
7. This design approval does not include the future addition on the west side of the hospital.
This addition must be approved by the city before the city issues a building permit for the
addition.
8. All work shalt follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
4
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
I surveyed the 17 property owners within 350 feet of this site. We received two replies that were
both for the proposal.
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 78,590 square feet (1.8 acres ).
Existing land use: Hillcrest Animal Hospital and a single dwelling
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: New offices across County Road D
South: A house planned and zoned M -1 owned by Sparkle Auto
West: Single dwellings along County Road D
East: Highway 61
PLANNING
Land Use Plan and Zoning designations: M -1
Code Requirements
Section 35- 187(b) states that no building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered
or conducted within 350 feet of a residential district without a CUP.
Criteria for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the, city council may grant a CUP, subject to the nine standards for
approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 17 and 18.
Application Date
We received this application on February 12, 2002. State law requires that the city take action
within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. City council action is required on
this proposal by April 11, 2002.
p:sec3Xhillcrest anirnal.cup.doc
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Landscape Plan Details
5. Proposed Grading Plan
6. Building Elevations
7. Building Elevations
8. Conditional Use Permit Narrative dated February 12, 2002
9. Chris Cavett comments dated February 27, 2002
10. CUP Resolution
11. Project Plans date - stamped February 12 2002 (separate attachment)
5
Attachmen=t 1
LOCATION MAP
no
i
N
Attachment 2
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
,' �. s too' 100
- - COUNTY ROAD D , - _ _ • L57. 5p � ..... , - - -• - - — -
430.6'
Its
N a
C4) . 2 0. e ,
N `
21 0
''y,,' 3110
02
s.6s ac. R ` -- • � -
- Qff o. , 3090 V5
N - `3085 --
r
• t[1 1
�► 22 3,
z SPARKLE AUTO -.
,
'3065
;
VOLV AWL
A
(s) gel
!
(IT)
LEXUS
All
■ I ) 1
571.G 14 Q to
` w
• -- — -
3 3 • S trt MP :A ..�' •,. r•asid Y r.. ,. ir' Ny w"w'• ..;`x; • !- `i- ...... *IC .;w
J
4.29 ac
GULDENS
r /
I
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
4
N
Attachment 3
,
-- - -- -- -- - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - ---- ---- - - - - -- --- --- -- -- - ---- - - - -- --- - -- - -- --- -- --- .- - - ---- - - --- .- -.-- -- -- ---- ---- -- ---- -- --- - - - - -- w- - - -- -- --•-
• VVV��r V N C O I a
�-�- -- ----------------------- -- 589'50'J7 "F 566.6 -=---------- - - - - -- -------------------------------
I �M y T" E * I ON Ii�Y OAWC RAVIIIS
C
I of w elves Ex DMP"H" WOACM*r �+GOow 9
0
PL AN"
!Ex ou.vEUT i u�•tu�+N+ ow �+ e4ne+n+our ally c I.t►ocW p&4&
PEA uwa%0% WWA=
SITE PLAN
4
N
v1 :6 ]
/..
- --
of
S ` 74
40 3 7 0 ,
s - - ``
TRAM
lee+ ow.a*
,Vwkp � ,
I LANDSCS4 2 FE — NOTES
soft"* "Flopom i To 10111+..1
..., E111�TMD !�lw0� Twlt TO K AQ�OVID
ll!" * M&CX111" 1Tw To FAR""
,/
E"TM 7"M To 0E pvqoww
i SITE PLAN
1 1 �.�
will 0E080%low "in
IQY
AGE Y NOTES:
e4
A� Nsu rvemnee+ TIls
(D EXarG SITMIN"
-
OZ REMOVE EXTERIOR LiGW POLES fi TWUS)
/ ALL 01W woo am" TO of iEmm 00 .E Y NO=
l M 9"T111p T» pillonck4w - M Nw TN"s F%AwTw
O E"rG CCNCRETE WALK - REMOVE
/ ELOMM -%I AND OwWt TO IRCtW! 110081ON MATS
l 11"Iro"TE 1{Y MAN 1a1D11 ALL WC AC FLA"Wo AXEAI
O ocsrcl BUILDING - RET1pvs
O EX T'G s4+ED - REM10vE
O ZX6rG KENNEL - R_T -IoVE
O EX670 RETAJNMG WALL - RIET'IOvE
r
O 8 EXST'G FLAG POLE - PeM vE
O 1 1 IEr9OVE EWST1G DRIVEWAY EMRMICE
O NEW BITUMINOUS CURB - SEE
11 EXSrG GCNCRETE PAD - REMOVE '
-
@ EXbrG GARAGE - INMEMOvE
(19) NEW CONCRETE CAS -SEE 8
Id NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK s• THICK We
M ESN. l0' - 0 - WIDE. oROOM Fp jew
CONTROL JTS A'.0. CC-
/m / T EycP JTS 10 -0 OL
IS MANDIGAP 516-W - SEE
O 25' SITE LIGwr MME s rr 1) - SEE e
I� NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK s- TWI" W/
MEW. b' -C' WIDE. BROOM FIN*w
CONTROL AS A'-V' Of- / EXp JTS
20-.0' OG
18 NM CGNCRETw- SIDEWALK s' TWICK V
MESH •' -0 WIDE. BROOM FINIoN
CONTROL JTS 4' -0' or— / E>ep jr* Jo -o O.C.
SITE PLAN
4
N
Attachment 4
.%4M WATC
C (
A'•0' 0
03*1
2 NTRAN!1 j LANDSCAPE AN
NORTH
I LMDSCAFE NOTES
exlsTlua evcw�l�tN T*1!Q T1p e! 1�lrfOvlO
CM9TWO OWCU is TWE t0 REMAIN
E)flST*O DWOL400 TIC TO BE WE"QWM
NNW oM4%Ww?M
/ Npu lvl�+ tl!!
ALL 0167MMO AREA* TO M irWW CR WCOM y MMW
M 6W*T G TMH IENIONED . N NW TWE0 R.Ah" D
OLOMB J,1 AND Owok TO Pacely! EAODION MAT*
@W*QATE 1W RAN 984OR ALL Wo MD PLANTOO ♦>alA6
5W&A J 64A
NEW RETJNIWo
WALL OEE GIvIL
PLANT MATERIAL
SCHEDULE
sari M "
C MMM N"
spa
5
A
'RAXN A PL'NM7LVANIGA
PA TMOM AbW
t uz•
IM
6
s
PICEA GLANC460E 16ATA
BLAC 04ILL 6FMRZE
26
C
sYRN" PALIS"AWA
DWAW KOREAN LILAC
W POT
21
D
EPIRAEA
6PIREO LITTLE PRW—M
6' *OT
GRa7IJND GONM S/A' TO 1 In*
R ROM OVER L ANDSCAM
RIC
EOG1NCs, VINYL
LANDSCAPE PLAN DETAILS
li
N
Attachment 5
it
APPROWATE LOCATION FOR EAST 4' SANITARY
MWM (FIELD VERIFY LOCATION. ELEVATION.
SrZF- & PIPE SrZE) TYPICAL
CUT EWSTING BIIUM*MS
AND BLEND KV ENT INTO AND EXTEND EASTING SIT
EXMIM BIT CURB PAST C13
74 SAW Q.J(V . '• ,/r Pr •ANtmy 'Woo
- -S89 50'37 "E 566.60--
EWEND SeMC9' , AS
NEM.0 TO MATCH
YCE
L l
dw--
al 7
ett
40fo
A
J .,
7
Y F
i f
/ F
gt �
j
All
PROPOSED GRADING PLAN
10
4
Attachment
o"SP4ALT SWWaLES
DARK ENROWN
F lolahmCMESUMMa rm
2nvvl� pro
oo lo 1 1 .
9M
_ -- �i� -
. ..
MF
onw�
-MEN= wwwww�
MEMO
Will
Ed M =am
OWE"
MINA
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
4
Attachment 7
REVEAL
STUCCO
REVEAL
3TIJCGO .;
STONE SILL
DECORATIVE MASONRY
BROM -
12
Ar
2 WEST ELEVATION
,t 1/8 I . -0 .
KEY MQMS TO ELeVATIONS
O STIJCC"d 'd' • CREat"1 j r-
OD STWW '9' - 81510M ASPHALT OW NGLE3
DARK BR
OG STUCCO 'C' - MGM � METAL L CIIVER. PREPINISWEO
3 1 STUCCO
REVEAL
I.i ♦!' ,� �••1 �- 1•. - -•� rf s. w;rt�: �.�iy -, REVEAL
-;,.� ��, � ,;_ :i : : -: �.,�.�: r-:�� ;•�• _�....:;���� =' wv -• ,:_,... %:: <,a. STUCCO
`•,t. _ .'.:,,:.:.�. - �:•... " »�;c.. •. , ._ �,•:':.:tt
STONE SILL
11 I 1 I 41 1 =1XLo 1 DECORATIVE MA -
wlNoo� ORaw
AST ELEVA TION
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
12
4
N
I t 1 II I I I
Attachment 8
HILLCREST ANIMAL HOSPITAL
NARRATIVE FOR PROPOSED FACILITY
1320 East County Road D
Maplewood, MN 55109
February 12, 2002
COMPANY BACKGROUND
Hillcrest Animal Hospital is one of the oldest small animal veterinary facilities in Maplewood
and the surrounding area. It concentrates on offering top quality care and service at competitive
prices. Dr. Jennifer Bouthilet purchased the hospital in 1992 from Dr. Conway J. Rosell. Over
the past ten years, Dr. Bouthilet has grown the business 5% annually. That growth along with
additional. staff has put a toll on the existing facility. The 60 -year -old facility was designed for
only one veterinarian. Now up to three veterinarians work there each day. The work areas are
crammed into small spaces and there are roof, plumbing and electrical problems. Tjiis- hampers
Hillcrest's ability to deliver all the services it would like to offer to its clients.
Based on a demographic survey completed in 2000 and on listening to clients' needs, Dr.
Bouthilet is proposing a veterinary hospital that will be a "one stop shop" for their clients.
Included will be hospital facilities, boarding, grooming, training, sports medicine and
rehabilitation services. In order to accomplish this goal, the hospital needs to be rebuilt.
PROJECT SITE / PHASES
The hospital's current site is an excellent location for the facility. The size of the parcel also
allows the new hospital to be built while the existing hospital remains operating. Overall, the
project will be completed in several phases. The first phase, purchase of the land and buildings,
was recently completed. The second phase, removal of the existing house and design of the new
facility, is currently underway. The third phase, construction of the hospital and boarding
facility, will be completed by summer 2002. The fourth phase includes moving into the new
facility, demolishing the existing structure and completing the site amenities; scheduled to be
completed fall 2002. The fifth phase, scheduled for 2003 — 2004, will be an addition to the
facility to accommodate a training and rehabilitation center.
UTILITIES
The site design and storm water drainage system is designed to balance the pre - and post
development hardsurface / runoff, therefore a retention pond is not required. There are three
existing sanitary sewer stubs to the site. The new building will connect to one of the existing
services, as shown on the drawings. Water is provided to the existing building from a well. In
November, 2001, Dr. Bouthilet petitioned the City to extend municipal water service to the site.
The City Council has directed staff to complete a feasibility study for the water service
extension. Resolution of the water service extension will be done concurrently with this
application.
13
HILLCREST ANIMAL HOSPITAL
NARRATIVE FOR PROPOSED FACILITY
February 12, 2002
Page 2 of 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA,
The proposed facility requires a conditional use permit because the site has residentially zoned
property adjacent to the west. This application for conditional use permit is for all phases of
construction shown on the drawings, including the future 3,300 sq. ff. addition for a training
center. The following are responses to the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit.
1. The proposed facility maintains the current use on the site and the design conforms to the
City's zoning ordinance requirements.
2. The proposed facility will enhance the character of the surrounding area.
3. The combination of a new facility and removal of the existing 60 -year old building would not
depreciate property values.
4. The primary use of the new facility remains as a veterinary clinic, with pet boarding
facilities. The future addition would include a training center. None of the proposed uses
would cause a nuisance, or disturbance, to any person or property.
5. The vehicular traffic generated because of the new facility would only be a minimal increase.
Access to / from County Road D would be improved, because the existing steep driveway
access near the intersection of D and Highway 61 would be abandoned and the remaining
driveway will be rebuilt with a flatter slope.
6. The new facility would be served by adequate public facilities. Refer to discussion of
utilities on previous page.
7. The use does require extension of public water service to the site, per City requirements.
This cost would not be considered excessive relative to this use, because the City would be
extending this service anyway, in the future.
8. The site design was carefully planned to maintain most of the large, healthy trees on the site;,
the new trees being planted are on the west side of the property to buffer the adjacent
residential property. The significant change in elevation on the site is maintained with this
proposal.
9. The use would cause minimal, if any, adverse environmental effects.
14
Attachment 9
Hillcrest Animal Clinic —
Chris Cavett, February 27, 2002
Engineering Plan Review
Drainage/ Storm Water Treatment / Rainwater Gardens:
1. The storm water management plan as proposed is unacceptable. Earlier discussions
with the owner and architect regarding drainage were not incorporated into the
grading and drainage plans. It was staff' s understanding that drainage and treatment
of the storm water would be done in the north west part of the site through the use of
bioretention basins, (rainwater gardens) that would overflow to the Count y Road D
ditch.
2. Install catch basins on the new driveway to direct as much flow from the parking lot
as possible into the bioretention basin. As designed, the entire parking lot will flow
directly into County Road D. This is unacceptable.
3. Design and construct a large bioretention basin, (rainwater garden) in the vicinity of
the existing bituminous surface at the in front of each building. Rainwater gardens
can be situated around the site to capture, store and infiltrate water directed from the
parking lot, drive areas and roof down spouts. Grade swales and provide spillways to
direct this flow into the rainwater gardens.
4. The "Retention Pond" on the east side of the site shall be designed as a bioretention
basin.
5. Rock Infiltration Sumps must be installed below the rainwater gardens to facilitate
infiltration. Provide a detail in the plan. Rock infiltration sump should be a
minimum of 4' Dia. X 3' tall. 1 1 /2" clean clear rock wrapped in type 5 geotextile
filter fabric, (felt). The top of the rock infiltration sump should be placed
approximately 12- inches below finished bottom of the rainwater garden.
6. Provide details and a description on the plan of how the rainwater garden area will be
prepared. The garden area should be sub -cut to provide 12- inches of bedding
material. The bedding material should consist of a mixture of 50% salvaged on -site
topsoil and clean 50% organic compost. The subsoils in the rainwater garden should
be scarified to a depth of 12- inches before the bedding material is placed. The
rainwater garden should be protected with silt fence after grading to prevent silting
into the area, as well as compaction of the soil by construction equipment. The
rainwater garden area should be topped before or after planting with "shredded" wood
mulch. "Woodchips" are NOT acceptable mulching material.
7. A landscape plan for the bioretention basins /rainwater gardens shall be required as
part of final plan approval. More information on bioretention basins can be found on
the metrocouncil web site and view their BW Manual:
http: / /www.metrocouncil. or environment /Watershed /bmp /manual . htm or contact
Chris Cavett, Maplewood Assistant City Engineer, 651- 770 -4554.
15
Grading and Erosion Control:
1. Erosion control matting is required on all slopes 3:1 or steeper. These locations
should be called out on the plans.
2. Heavy duty, monofilament silt fence shall be required at the base of the eastern slopes
and in the County Road D ditch, near the entrance. Revise silt fence detail.
3. Specify the seeding mixtures to be used on the eastern slopes. Does the applicant
intend to use a low- maintenance native grass mix on these slopes? Or do they intend
to mow these slopes?
4. A rock entrance pad is required. Include a detail of this pad.
5. Existing trees to be saved on the Landscape plan do NOT correspond with the
proposed grades on the grading plan. Trees to be removed shall be indicated on the
grading and site plans.
6. A structural engineer shall certify final plans of the retaining wall. A building permit
issued by the city is required for all walls 4 -feet or higher.
7. Escrow for erosion control and the retaining wall shall be required before the grading
permit will be issued.
S. Please submit to the engineering department the following information before
requesting of _a_ grading permit
a. Revised Grading, Drainage, Erosion control and Landscaping plans.
b. Cubic Yards of material to be moved on site and imported.
c. Square footage of area to be disturbed and graded.
d. Square footage of retaining wall to be constructed.
9. Site disturbance of 1 -acre or more requires a permit from the Ramsey- Washington
Metro watershed District.
Utility Plan:
1. Utility plan details for water service are still pending the outcome of the feasibility
study.
16
Attachment 10
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Dr. Jennifer Bouthilet, of Hillcrest Animal Hospital, applied for a conditional use
permit to construct a building in the M -1 (light manufacturing zoning district) closer than 350 feet to
property zoned for residential.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property on the southwest corner of Highway 61 and County
Road D. The legal descriptions are:
1322 County Road D Legal Description
SUBJECT TO HWY & ROAD: PART NLY OF A LINE BEG ON WL OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 3 183.55
FT S OF NW CORNER TO POINT ON CL OF HWY 61 323.36 FT SWLY FROM INT OF HWY 61
& NL OF SAID NW 1/4 & THERE TERMINATING AND EASTERLY OF LINE BEGINING ON SAID
DESC LINE 183 FT SELY FROM WL OF SAID NW 1/4 TO POINT ON NL OF SAID NW 1/4
257.50 FT EAST OF SAID NW 1/4 CORNER & THERE TERMINATING IN SECTION 3,
TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 (PIN 03- 29 -22 -22 -0008)
1320 County Road ' D Legal Description
SUBJECT TO ROAD: THE NORTH 223 FEET OF E 5 FEET AT N TO 15 FEET AT S OF N 741
FT OF SECTION 4, ALSO PART NLY OF A LINE BEG ON W L OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 3
183.55 FT S NW CORNER TO POINT ON CENTERLINE OF HWY 61 323.36 FT SWLY FROM
INT OF HWY 61 & NL OF SAID NW 1/4 & THERE TERMINATING AND WLY OF LINE BEG ON
SAID DESC LINE 183 FT SELY FROM WL OF SAID NW 1/4 TO POINT ON NL OF SAID NW 1/4
257.50 FT E OF SAID NW 1/4 CO R & THERE TERMINATING IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29,
RANGE 22 (PIN 03- 29 -22 -22 -0009)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On March 4, 2002, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
conditional use permit for the proposed animal hospital.
2. The city council held a public hearing on March 25, 2002. City staff published a notice in the
paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air
17
pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness,. electrical interference or
other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes. This approval also includes the proposed future
addition shown on the west side of the new hospital.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or
the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The owner shall combine the two properties into one parcel for tax and identification purposes
before the city issues a building permit.
5. The city and the owner shall agree to a plan for providing water to the site before the city
issues a building permit for the new hospital.
6. There shall not be any outdoor storage unless the city council approves a conditional use
permit for outdoor storage.
7. The applicant meeting all the conditions and plan changes required by the city engineer.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 2002.
IF
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MARCH 4, 2002
a. Hillcrest Animal. Hospital Conditional Use Permit (1320 County Road D)
Mr. Roberts stated that Dr. Jennifer Bouthilet, representing the Hillcrest Animal Hospital, is
proposing to build a 7,000 square -foot animal hospital at the southwest corner of Highway 61 and
County Road D. This proposal includes constructing a new animal hospital to replace the current
animal hospital and a former house on the site. Specifically, the owners recently demolished. a
house on the property, will construct the new hospital (if approved), and then will demolish the
existing hospital after completing the new hospital.
The proposed building would be constructed of decorative rock -faced block and stucco and would
have asphalt shingles.
The applicant is requesting approval of the following:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) to build the new building closer than 350 feet to a residential
zoning district. The nearest residential district is immediately to the west of the site. The
proposed building would be 229 feet from the west property line of the site.
2. Approval of site, landscape and architectural plans.
The proposed building also would be 300 feet from the nearest house to the west. The proposed
future addition would be 256 feet from this house. The city may want to consider methods like
hours of operation, screening and light -glare control to protect the nearby residents from
disturbances.
The proposed site plan shows a future addition on the west side of the hospital building. The
location of the addition should not cause any problems. In fact, the proposed future addition would
be farther east than the existing animal hospital.
Mr. Roberts said that Chris Cavett, the Assistant City Engineer, did a review of the proposed
drainage /storm water and grading and erosion control plans. His comments were in the staff
report and should be noted since he has many concerns with the proposed plans and will be
requiring many changes to the plans before the city will issue a grading permit or a building permit
for the project.
Mr. Roberts said that the city and the owner will need to agree to a plan for providing water to the
site before the city issues a building permit for the new animal hospital.
Mr. Roberts also stated that the proposed site now has two separate lots. The former house was
on one parcel and the existing animal hospital is on the other parcel. The city should require the
owner to combine the two parcels into one property as a condition of approval of this project.
Mr. Roberts said that staff is recommending approval of item A. of the staff report, subject to the
seven conditions listed.
Commissioner Ledvina said he is unclear to the property ownership of the lots at 3065 and 3085,
are they both owned by Sparkle Auto?
Mr. Roberts said yes they do, and he should have made it more clearly in the report.
Commissioner Trippler said he was offended by the reference to the veterinarian by her first name
instead of by doctor. She has been his veterinarian for 20 years and he did not even know what
her first name was. She deserves to be addressed as doctor and he said staff and members
generally do not and should not address people as their first names. It is very inappropriate in his
opinion. In addition, staff said there were 17 property owners that were surveyed and only two
replied back and both were for the proposal. He asked staff if the person living at 1296 County
Road D respond to the survey? The reason he is asking is that staff raised some issues regarding
adequate screening to the west and the hospital has been there fora long time and there has been
no screening. He wondered if the screening is really that necessary?
Mr. Roberts said the owner to the west did not reply.
Commissioner Dierich asked. if the veterinarian hospital will still have the same services that were
offered before such as the grooming and boarding and does that require any permitted uses?
Mr. Roberts said it was his understanding that they may expand the services available at the
hospital and keep what they have as well. The only time the city would be concerned would be if
the hospital wanted to have outside animal boarding, but they are not proposing that.
Commissioner Dierich had a question regarding the new driveway. The current driveway is a
straight shot up the hill and she is having trouble understanding where the driveway is going to
access and where the new parking lot will be.
Mr. Roberts said there will be the one main entrance off of County Road D and the second
entrance off of County Road D near Highway 61 will be removed. From a safety and grading
standpoint, this change will be an improvement.
Commissioner Trippler asked if the applicant is going to regrade that driveway to make a more
gradual slope?
Mr. Roberts said it would probably be about the same.
Mr. Cavett stated the parking lot is actually getting lowered a bit. It should be an improvement
from what is there currently.
Chairperson Rossbach asked staff if the building will sit lower than the existing building? Right now
the building sits on the peak of the hill.
Mr. Cavett said the peak of the hill is at about a 918 so there will be about a five -foot drop in
building height.
Chairperson Rossbach asked if that means the building will be built down into the hill or that the
top of the hill will be taken off?
Mr. Cavett said the hill will be taken off and grading the side.
Chairperson Rossbach asked if the applicant would like to come forward.
Dr. Jennifer Bouthilet, the owner of the animal hospital at 1320 County Road D, addressed the
commission. She stated they are really looking forward to this project because for many years
they have been dealing with a very run down building with a lot of problems. There is a lack of
room for expansion and there is only room for one full time doctor.
Chairperson Rossbach asked if she or someone else actually lived in the house that was
demolished?
Dr. Bouthilet stated that until the end of December, Dr. Conway J. Rosell owned the house as well
as the clinic building. They were already in negotiations for buying the property and the buildings.
He had a tenant living in the house and there has been nobody living in the house since the end of
August
There were no other questions or comments from either the applicant or by the commission.
Commissioner Pearson moved to adopt the resolution on pages 17 and 18 of the staff report. This
resolution approves a conditional use permit to build a new animal hospital that would be closer
than 350 feet to a residential district at 1320 County Road D. The city bases this approval on the
findings required by the ordinance and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve . minor changes. This approval also includes the proposed future
addition shown on the west side of the new hospital.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or
the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The owner shall combine the two properties into one parcel for tax and identification purposes
before the city issues a building permit.
5. The city and the owner shall agree to a plan for providing water to site before the city issues a
building permit for the new hospital.
6. There shall not be any outdoor storage unless the city council approves a conditional use
permit for outdoor storage.
7. The applicant meeting all the conditions and plan changes required by the city engineer.
Commissioner Ledvina seconded. Ayes — Dierich, Ledvina, Mueller, Pearson,
Rossbach, Trippler
The motion is passed.
Mr. Roberts said this item will go to the community design review board on March 12, 2002, and
then to the city council meeting on March 25, 2002.
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2002
a. Hillcrest Animal Hospital (1320 County Road D)
Ms. Finwall stated that Dr. Jennifer Bouthilet, representing the Hillcrest Animal
Hospital, is proposing to build a 7,000 square -foot animal hospital at the
southwest corner of Highway 61 and County Road D. This proposal includes
constructing a new animal hospital to replace the current animal hospital and a
former house on the site. Specifically, the owners recently demolished a house
on the property, will construct the new hospital (if approved), and then will
demolish the existing hospital after completing the new hospital.
The applicant is requesting approval of the following:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) to build the new building closer than 350 feet
to a residential zoning district. The nearest residential district is immediately
to the west of the site. The proposed building would be 229 feet from the
west property line of the site.
2. Approval of site, landscape and architectural plans.
Ms. Finwall said the proposed building also would be 300 feet from the nearest
house to the west. The proposed future addition . would be 256 feet from this
house.
The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP at their March 4,
2002, meeting. The community design review board should act on the design
aspect listed as item B. numbers 1 through 8 as outlined in the staff report.
Ms. Finwall stated the proposed building would be attractive and would have
decorative rock -faced block, stucco and asphalt shingles. The proposed colors
are brown, cream and beige. As proposed, the building would fit the character of
this highway- frontage business location.
The proposed site plan shows a future addition on the west side of the hospital
building. The location of the addition should not cause any problems. In fact, the
proposed future addition would be farther east than the existing. animal hospital.
The design of the addition, however, should be reviewed by the city before the
city approves a building permit for the addition.
The proposed landscaping west of the parking lot and driveway is a good start,
but the owner should develop this plan further. The city code requires that the
developer screen the parking lot from the home to the west by a six - foot -tall, 80
percent opaque screen. The owner may accomplish this screening by berming,
fencing, plantings or a combination of these. As proposed, the plan does not
meet the code requirement for screening. As such, the applicant should expand
the landscape plan to meet this code requirement. If the applicant wants to use
trees to meet the screening requirement, the trees should include six - foot -tall
Austrian Pines, Black Hills Spruce or a combination of these or other similar
species of trees.
Ms. Finwall said the applicant has not proposed any plantings on the north or
east sides of the building. In addition, the proposed plans show a dog run on the
north side of the building. The applicant should further develop the landscape
plan for these parts of the site by adding no- maintenance plantings on the north
and east sides of the building. These plantings also should include provisions for
screening the dog run from views to the north and .west with opaque fencing or
trees.. There is a house on the Sparkle Auto property to the south. The city
code, however, does not require screening on this side of the site since the city
has planned and zoned this property light manufacturing.
Ms. Finwall said with the County Road D realignment proposal this portion of
County Road D may be a cul -de -sac at this point which will make the north
elevation less visible to passing vehicles.
The applicant should provide a lighting plan indicating the light spread and fixture
design. The lighting code requires a plan when near homes. The fixtures
installed should be a design that hides the bulb and lens from view to avoid
nuisances.
A retaining wall is also proposed along the east side of the parking lot and a four -
foot high fence is also proposed above the retaining wall. This retaining wall is
up to 12 feet in height, although the applicant states this retaining wall may be
modified to create a stepping of this wall which staff does feels is a good idea.
Staff suggests the wall be no more than four feet in height and is landscaped.
Because the landscape plan is incomplete at this time staff recommends the
applicant submit a revised landscape plan for the community design review
board approval. This plan should include additional landscaping on the north and
east sides of the building and code required screening on the west side of the
parking lot and driveway.
Board member Olson is curious about the signage and the elevations. She
asked if the south elevation is going to be the entrance and the exits? And she
asked if the signage is going to be on the east side? The parking is basically
going to be on the south and west side?
Ms. Finwall said yes that is correct. The signage proposed would require a
separate sign permit but the signage is intended to face Highway 61 on the east
elevation.
Board member Olson asked if there are going to be any freestanding signs?
Chairperson Ledvina asked the applicant to address the board.
Mr. Paul Meyer of Paul Meyer Architects addressed the board.
Dr. Jennifer Bouthilet the owner of the Hillcrest Animal Hospital addressed the
board.
Mr. Meyer said the signage proposed is on the east side because that is the
highway frontage to Highway 61 and there will be signs on the south side and at
each of the entry points to the building. He said regarding monument or
freestanding signs, there is an existing sign that is along the frontage road.
There is also an existing sign that the applicant would be looking to replace at the
north driveway entrance.
Board member Olson said the north side is blank with no signage or indication of
what is there.
Mr. Meyer said the site is very elevated and there is a lot of established growth
on the hill. The applicant is trying to blend the building in with the natural setting.
He said there really isn't any exposure to the people passing on County Road D
on the north elevation because of the elevation and natural growth.
Board member Olson asked if they are going to be digging into the elevation and
removing vegetation for the dog run?
Mr. Meyer said they wouldn't be effecting the established vegetation. There is
about 20 feet of rise up to the site from the street, so if you are driving you really
need to look up to see the building.
Board member Jorgenson said he perceives that when one drives by the site
they will be mostly seeing the roofline of the building on the north side.
Mr. Meyer said yes and that is why there is really no advantage to having
signage on that side other than the monument side.
Board member Jorgenson said the building is back a ways and you have the sign
that draws you to it but if you drive too fast you will miss the building passing up
County Road D from Highway 61.
Mr. Meyer said part of the goal is to locate the building to the east so the building
itself is visible. The applicant is moving the building away from the residential
district over 100 feet further. Part of the reason the driveway is curbed the way it
is is to save the majority of the trees that are on site. Mr. Meyer said the site plan
is really laid out quite well to save the beautiful trees. The request to have more
plantings on the north side will not really enhance the area.
Board member Olson said she was just curious how the grading plan and the
dog run incorporated would lay out with it running so close to County Road D.
She would imagine that there is going to be a real steep grade there.
Mr. Meyer said not at the dog run. At the edge of the dog run and down there will
be a steep grade.
Board member Olson asked if the dog run would be concrete?
Mr. Meyer said it is a peat gravel surface with a fence enclosure.
Board member Olson asked if the dog run would run the whole length of the
building?
Mr. Meyer said the site plan indicates that the dog run is 8 X 8 feet.
Dr. Bouthilet said the purpose of the dog run is to take the dogs out to go to the
bathroom a few times a day while their runs inside are being cleaned. When
they are outside they are out there for temporary basis.
Chairperson Ledvina asked the applicant if they had samples of the materials to
be used for this project?
Mr. Meyer brought a sample board to show board members of the different
products and colors that will be used.
Chairperson Ledvina said he had a question regarding the retaining wall. He
wonders what the views are of the applicant regarding the retaining wall. - This
will be a major site feature as it relates to the appearance along Highway 61.
Mr. Meyer said in order to achieve what the applicant wanted to do with the site
the improvements were integrated as much as they could with the existing trees
because there are s ome significant trees. In terms of the location of the building
they really needed the retaining wall on this portion of the site because if they
came to the south side of the site the parking really didn't lay in well because of
the north slope. To actually use the site appropriately they wanted to move the
building as far to the east as possible. But in order for the property to drain
properly, they needed to have the parking lot higher than they wanted it to be just
so it tied in with the trees on the south side of the property.
Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Meyer if the entire wall .would be 12 -feet high?
Mr. Meyer said not for the entire length. The contours slope into it. A portion of
that will be screened by the trees that are remaining in that area and along the
south elevation it will be sloping back to zero. The concern at stepping the
retaining wall at four -foot intervals is with each of those intervals it takes two or
three feet more property. If you take the wall farther to the east to accomplish
the stepping, the wall actually becomes higher because you are going father
down the hill and you also encroach into the next tree that they would like to
save.
Chairperson Ledvina said he still has a concern about a 12 -foot high retaining
wall and how that will appear.
Board member Olson asked Mr. Meyer what type of block they are going
proposing for the retaining wall?
Mr. Meyer said it will be a modular block and the color will be similar to the
building colors.
Board member Olson asked if they are using Anchor or Keystone blocks?
Mr. Meyer said they have not selected that yet. It will probably not be a Keystone
block because they are about 85 pounds apiece.
Board member Olson stated that at recent meeting at work she learned that
when building retaining walls it is important to check the imperviousness of the
concrete to ensure that it has freeze /thaw factor variability. She said they are
finding that a lot of retaining walls are failing after 15 years so that is just a
caution she would like to pass onto the applicant.
Mr. Meyer said he understands that 10 to 15 years ago there was some really
poorly designed retaining walls. With today's technology they are finding out
more about the soil pressures and which products work best. As the design
professional Mr. Meyer is very sensitive to those facts. Because the parking lot
is located so close to the wall, it will also add a surcharge load onto the wall.
Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Meyer if he had any concerns regarding the staff
report in terms of the conditions that were outlined?
Mr. Meyer said a concern of his was providing additional landscaping to the north
side. On the west side of the property they proposed to have a row of evergreen
trees and a row of deciduous trees and they thought that was superior to putting
two rows of evergreen trees on the west property line. Staff did not disagree with
that but they had to report the non - compliance with the ordinance in terms of the
screening requirements. There hasn't been any screening on that part of the
property. The replacement trees are on that side and they thought from a design
standpoint that mixing the types of trees was beneficial. The second component
to that is the uncertainty of what alignment County Road D will have on the west
side of the property in terms of the screening requirements.
Board member Olson said she prefers the combination of evergreen trees and
deciduous trees for screening.
Board member Jorgenson asked Mr. Meyer what the time line for the future
expansion to the west is?
Mr. Meyer said an optimistic timeline is two years. A realistic timeline is more
than two years but that all depends on how things go.
Dr. Bouthilet said it would also depend on how well the business handles the new
mortgage payment.
Chairperson Ledvina said he is very concerned about the 12 -foot retaining wall.
He believes it needs to be broken up into sections. He is not sure how it can be
designed but he has very strong feelings about a continuous retaining wall that
high. He thinks the design of the building, the materials, the color schemes, and
the parking lot will be a very nice, but he. has concerns about the retaining wall.
'Mr. Meyer asked what types of plantings would be required above the stepped
retaining wall?
Chairperson Ledvina said he would recommend something like evergreen
bushes that would look nice for the full four seasons.
Mr. Meyer said the applicant would prefer to put a wildflower mix in there to tie in
with the north side of the building.
Chairperson Ledvina said he would prefer some kind of evergreen bushes
because the wildflowers are going to die and then the sections will have nothing
alive above them.
Dr. Bouthilet asked if they could have something that would climb up the wall?
Chairperson Ledvina said that would only get you through two seasons. In winter
that will not be visible and he really believes it will look better with evergreen
bushes, it will be visible from the road and it will look nicer. He thinks the
landscape plan needs to be brought back to the community design review board
with revisions. At first he thought it could be done on the staff level but he
believes it should be revised and brought back to members because of the
details of the retaining wall and landscaping.
Board member Jorgenson said he would feel better about the west elevation
being so plain if he knew when the addition would be built. It may be two years
or it could be ten years before the addition takes place.
Dr. Bouthilet said it is plain but there is a huge silver maple tree that is tall and
wide and you will hardly notice the whole expanse of the wall that was
mentioned.
Board member Jorgenson moved to approve the plans date - stamped February
g pp p
12, 2002, for the proposed Hiilcrest Animal Hospital at 1320 County Road D.
The owner shall do the following: (CDRB changes to the recommendations are
underlined).
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building
permit for this project.
2. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit:
a. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. The plans shall meet
all the requirements of the city engineer. The utility plans shall provide a
fire hydrant where the new driveway of the hospital meets County Road D.
b. A site lighting plan showing the light spread and fixture design. The light
fixtures must have concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield glare
from the residents.
3. Submit revised plans for CDRB approval as follows:
a. The landscape plan shall include additional landscaping on the north and
the east sides of the building (especially in front of the doq run) and the
code - required screening on the west side of the parking lot and driveway.
b. The retaining wall plan shall include the retaining wall shown with a
minimum of a two -foot step or breaking in tiers with landscapinq located
above the tiers. Any wall that is more than four feet tall requires a building
permit issued bX the city.
4. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Install a handicap- parking sign for the handicap- parking space.
c. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped
areas.
d. Stripe all customer parking spaces at a width of 9 1 /2 feet and the employee
spaces at 9 feet.
5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
b. The -city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the
unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June
1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of
occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any,
unfinished work.
6. Signs are not part of this approval. The applicant shall apply for sign permits
with staff.
7. This design approval does not include the future addition on the west side of
the hospital. This addition must be approved by the city before the city issues
a building permit for the addition.
8. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
Board member Olson seconded. Ayes — Jorgenson, Ledvina, Olson
The motion passed.
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT Action by Council
TO: City Manager Date
Endorsed
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Modfflicd
Rejected
SUBJECT: Hillcrest Animal Hospital (T.H. - 61 /CountyRoad. D) Water Main, Project 01 -28:
Public Hearing, 7:15 p.m. -- Recommendation to Reschedule Public Hearing
DATE: March 18, 2002
Introduction
The public hearing for this project had been scheduled for 7:15 p.m., Monday, March 25,2002. Notices
of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The city council was to consider ordering the
improvement following the public hearing.
Staff is now recommending that the city council reschedule the public hearing due to new project
developments.
Background
On December 12, 2001, the city council ordered the preparation of a feasibility study to investigate
serving the properties in the area of T.H. 61 and County Road D with a public water system. The
Hillcrest Animal Hospital property had submitted a petition requesting the city to serve their site by
municipal water.
Due to the critical schedule with the Hillcrest Animal Hospital, a particular scope and financing for
the project was identified. However there were many issues that have surfaced that simply require
further investigation.
Most recently, staff met with St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) and staff from Vadnais
Heights. Most discussions were regarding how both communities should ultimately serve the area
of T.H. 61 and County Road D with water. Some of the scenarios discussed:
1. SPRWS /Maplewood inherit a segment of existing water main on County Road D from Vadnais
Heights, and serve all properties in Maplewood and Vadnais Heights in this area with SPRWS
water. The project could be completed in 2002.
2. Vadnais Heights completes large loop on County Road D, under 1 -694 and along T.H. 61 to
Buerkle Road, and serves the Maplewood properties in this area with V.H. water. Project could
not be completed before 2003. A temporary arrangement would be required for the Hillcrest
Animal Hospital, as their current well facilities are not acceptable for their proposed site.
3. Both cities have independent systems and construct dual mains in the area. Cost will be higher
for all involved (Maplewood, Vadnais Heights and SPRWS).
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council open the public hearing, close the public hearing, direct
the city engineer to revise the feasibility study and reschedule a new public hearing for
7:00 p. m., Monday, April 22, 2002.
CIVIC
jw
Attachment
TAXOMM
law- di Z jw
= -.
PROJECT AREA
AVE
i .e 16
COUNTY D
WATER MAI-N E
am
f
HILLCREST ANIMAL HOSPITAL
FAOM MV
Remy
WH17F BEAR LAKE
•
�.Q� •'�r .:
�'� '':!:
a
CdRO► wQA� P
� � r000�� art
GALL /NIE
� �. ■
3 4.
C
Mom d
ST. J0
mum At
_
Ot
TAXOMM
law- di Z jw
= -.
l�
= 4
Opp wry WAM
ROSONM sw- i uE
2 Afr O & Mvww 0i
t �1
O� f� AYE
AM s
1� � 11r� k tr �✓ IIYE ��� �`d ..3 : t �
E P#os► � K Ei � �
�„ AYE ,�,� � `�" �' � � � L �
� ,s, �._ OL
LW 44L.
AM
Fox W_
LARMDIfM
IWL
j i g VAQ^V..
City ofMaplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
v, ENGINEERING DIVISION COUNTY ROAD D
Faso east County aooa a WATER MAIN EXTENSION
rwviowooa. Minn ss1os CP �� —Z$
(ssi) no -assn FAX ssi ) 770-4-506
vbm~ 6""
r"""w"m"Oft
mm"w"aftwom"s
"Larw"Nolval
'�&%"Rft EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
AVE
i .e 16
am
f
FAOM MV
Remy
Ati
r
-
cm
DOW w�
�?
r
R
I
'`' o
k soc vw
aerYr& w+E �o�rMa I�
2
1r.
°iw°Nt�r IwC
CF:
v"m
eR
ffff-
G
�E
s
� � T ; %
h .
cr.
lAl�
3000
y.. v um
wm
Ac
t AMC" A
j��f •
i
Aw-
+
cm
l
LUIL AWL
am~
ismall IM E wdE
MW
l�
= 4
Opp wry WAM
ROSONM sw- i uE
2 Afr O & Mvww 0i
t �1
O� f� AYE
AM s
1� � 11r� k tr �✓ IIYE ��� �`d ..3 : t �
E P#os► � K Ei � �
�„ AYE ,�,� � `�" �' � � � L �
� ,s, �._ OL
LW 44L.
AM
Fox W_
LARMDIfM
IWL
j i g VAQ^V..
City ofMaplewood
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
v, ENGINEERING DIVISION COUNTY ROAD D
Faso east County aooa a WATER MAIN EXTENSION
rwviowooa. Minn ss1os CP �� —Z$
(ssi) no -assn FAX ssi ) 770-4-506
vbm~ 6""
r"""w"m"Oft
mm"w"aftwom"s
"Larw"Nolval
'�&%"Rft EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
AGENDA ITEM //-
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Lift Station Relocation at Maple Hills Development, Project 02 -04:
a. Public Hearing, 7:30 p.m.
b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes)
DATE: March 18, 2002
Introduction
Action by Council
Dade
Endomd
Modified
Rejected
The public hearing for this project has been scheduled for 7:30 p.m., Monday, March 25, 2002. Notices
of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The feasibility study has been provided as a
supplement to the council packet. The study includes information on the proposed improvement and
financing. The city council will consider ordering the improvement following the public hearing..
Background
On December 12, 2001, the city council ordered preparation of a feasibility tud to investigate tY Y ate the
9
abandonment of the Bennington Woods lift station along with construction of the new lift station. On
February 11, 2002, the city council authorized adjusting the scope of the feasibility study to include
the abandonment of a lift station within St. Paul, which would benefit Maplewood as well as potential
drainage improvements in the immediate area.
The city council approved the Carriage Homes of Maple Hills at the February 25 council meeting. A
sanitary sewer lift station must serve the site. A city -owned lift station currently serves the
neighboring Bennington Woods development. A single Lift station would serve both developments
and the city's utility more efficiently.
The scope of the project has been defined as a two -phase project. The critical phase -one work will
include the relocation of the existing lift station and would be planned for this year. It was determined
that a less critical phase -two project, involving the St. Paul Parkway lift station, should be studied
more thoroughly and be.planned for 2003. The phase -two project will involve much more detail and
coordination with other agencies than is feasible at this time.
Due to the critical time frame of the phase -one project, the city council authorized the city engineer to
begin preparing plans and specifications on March 11, 2002, prior to ordering the improvement.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the
improvement of the Maple Hills Sanitary Sewer Lift Station, City Project, 02 -04.
Budget Impact
The resolution calls for establishing a project budget of $234,080. The financing plan is outlined
specifically in the feasibility study and calls for funding through an assessment to the developer and
funding from the sanitary sewer utility.
CMC
jw
Attachments
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING.
WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 11th day of March, 2002,
fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed Maple Hills Sanitary Sewer Lift
Station Relocation, City Project 02 -04,
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the
hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on March 25, 2002, and the council
has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the
same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the
feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood construct sanitary sewer main and relocate
lift station No. 19 at the proposed Carriage Homes of Maple Hills development, City
ty
Project 02 -04.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council
resolution adopted the 25th day of March, 2002.
3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is
hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making f said
i g
improvement.
4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers
necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $234,080
shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as follows:
Assessments (Developer) $151,232
Sanitary Sewer Fund _ 8.2 848
Total $234,080
M
7 rAld
. ' e ll
rtz 01as
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R
rang"'.
M E
I-IFT STgT1
c % I /t
MAPLEWOOD SnapShOt
d'vr
MapleHills Lift Station Rellocat.,
Selected Parcels (4
M-M
ST)
N
Map Scald pIa nSlght
Map Date: Marc; 5, 2002
Data Date: June 1, 2001
Note: The information provided b this program has been compiled from recorded deeds, plats, taxmaps, ion sources m is
surve and other public records and data. It is not a . le recorded map or surve and '
not intended to be used as one. Users of this data are hereb notified that the informat mention above should be consulted for verification of the information. Once again, USE AT
--Y16%w#UR-eWN RISK!!!
1)
Maio -Legend:
LABEL STPNT
HALFSEC
BUILDING
WATER
STREAMS
PARCEL
CITY
Selected Parcels (4
M-M
ST)
N
Map Scald pIa nSlght
Map Date: Marc; 5, 2002
Data Date: June 1, 2001
Note: The information provided b this program has been compiled from recorded deeds, plats, taxmaps, ion sources m is
surve and other public records and data. It is not a . le recorded map or surve and '
not intended to be used as one. Users of this data are hereb notified that the informat mention above should be consulted for verification of the information. Once again, USE AT
--Y16%w#UR-eWN RISK!!!
1)
Agenda # / I/- - Ll
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM- Tom Fkstrand, Assistant Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: outdoor - Lighting ordinance Amendment
DATA..: March 1, 2002
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Mimed
Rejects '
During- the past year, the community design revi board (CDRB) has r eviewed changes to
Maplewood's outdoor lighting requirements. The proposed amendment on pages 3--6 reflects
changes to eliminate problems like excessive light glare, minimizes light trespass and helps
P
reduce the energy and financial costs due to over lighting.
On February 12, 2002, the DDRB recommended approval of the proposed code amendment.
MAPLE'WOOD'S CURRENT OUTDOOR - LIGHTING ORDINANCE
(Last revised April 26, 1999)
The developer of any project, other than single or double dwellings, shall do the following:
Install exterior site lighting. The light source, including the lens covering the bulb, shall be
concealed from any residential area or public street. Lighting shall not exceed a .4 €ootcandle of
light intensity at a residential property line. Residential areas are areas planned or used for
residential purposes. A site- lighting plan shall be submitted for all development ap plications that
abut residential properties.
DISCUSSION
The CDRB's code amendment was inspired, in part, by Ms. Tine Thevenin's work. Ms. Thevenin
was a guest speaker who presented her research on outdoor lighting to the GDRB. Her research
was on the affect of outdoor lighting on the environme supported by a grant from the University
of Minnesota. The following is a brief summary of Ms. Thevenin's points about outdoor : ii htin
g g
Purpose of Lighting
• security
• visibility
Problems with Lighting
lig trespass - nuisance to neighbors and drivers
+� money spent - costly to run lights all night
glare - causes discomfort, can be blinding, appears cluttered, can lead to confusion
skyglow
hinders security when improperly directed
+� confusing to birds, animals and insects
Aspect of Good Lighting
Lights that illuminate only the area to be illuminated, not the sky or neighboring properties.
Proposed changes
The proposed ordnance makes the following ranges:
1. Defines the physical aspects of lighting fixtures (e.g., shielded lights, lamp and lumen)
and the resulting aspects of lighting fixtures (e.g., glare, light trespass and direct light).
2. creates lighting guidelines for recreational lighting (e.g., soccer fields, baseball
diamonds, skating rinks, etc). Recreational lighting would be required to be turned. off at
10:30 p.m. unless the city council allows a later time.
3. Revises the maximum light intensity allowed to .4 footcandles at all lot lines of a site, not
just at a residential lot line.
4. Provides a list of specific data that must be provided in a photometric plan (lighting plan).
.5. Requires a maximum height for freestanding lighting fixtures of 25 feet.
6.. Grandfathers nonconforming outdoor lights.
7. Addresses nuisances like light glare (being able to directly see the lamp or lens of the
luminary) and light trespass (light that extends beyond the site being illuminated).
8. creates language to protect single dwelling homeowners from lighting nuisances caused
by their single dwelling neighbors.
g. Rewires a detailed photometric plan as part of a CDRB application.
Other cities for comparison
Staff surveyed a sample of neighboring cities for their outdoor lighting requirements. We
surveyed Oakdale, White Bear Lake, Roseville, White Bear Township, Mounds View and St.
Paul. Our current ordinance is similar in scope to these communities. Their ordinances are all
fairly brief, as is ours, focusing on control of glare, light intensity limits and a requirement for the
submittal of a photometric plan. Our proposed ordinance is more explicit and more specific in
detail.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the proposed outdoor - lighting ordinance amendment.
p: o rdYig htin2. 501. doc
Attachment
Outdoor Lighting Ordinance Amendment
2
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OUTDOOR - LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
Section 1. This amendment changes Section - 28(C)(1) as follows (additions are underlined
and deletions are crossed out):
(c° ) The developer of any project, other than s ingle or double dwellings, shall do the following:
.
I
• %Wa %10166 SoME SWIM IL v
areas are ar
•
(1) Install outdoor lightingaccording to the following requirements:
a. Purpose and Intent.
The purpose and intent of the Outdoor Lightina Code is to create minimum standards
for the design and installation of all outdoor lighting. These regulations are intended
to reduce the problems created by improperly, designed and installed outdoor Fighting.
It is intended to eliminate problems of glare, minimize light trespass . and help reduce
the energy and financial costs of outdoor lighting by establishing regulations that limit
the area that certain outdoor luminaries illuminates A purpose of the Outdoor Ligh_ tine
Code is to set standards for outdoor li hting to enhance the reasonable _use and
enioyment of all property within the city. It is the intent of the -Outdoor Lighting code
to encoura a li htin p ractices that will reduce light ht ollution ty reducing u -li it
glare and over lighting_
b. Definitions.
Direct Licht: Light emitted dir from the lamp, ff of the reflector or reflector
diffuser or through the refractor or diffuser lens of a lu ninar�r.
Fixture: The assembiy that houses the lamp or lamps and can include all or some
of the following parts: housing, mounting bracket, pole socket, lam holder,,
ballast, reflector, mirror and/or refractor or lens.
Glare: Direct light emitted from a luminary with an intensitreat enough to
cause visual discomfort, eye fatigue, a reduction in a viewer's ability to see, or in
extreme cases, momentary blindness.
Grandfathered Luminaries: Luminaries not conforming to this Outdoor Lighting
Code that were in place at the time this code took effect.
M LamR.- The component of a luminary that produces the actual light.
Light Tresg)ass: Light produced by a lump that illuminates areas beyond the
boundaries of the properly on which it is located
Lumen: A unit of luminous flux. One footcandle is one lumen per scluare foot
For the purposes of these regulations, the lumen - output values shall be the initial
lumen output rating of the lamp.
Luminary: This is a complete liahting system and includes a lamp or lamps and a
fixture.
Outdoor Li . btin : The illumination of an outside area or obiect bv an man -
made device. This includes direct fighting- for signs and light emitting from within
a sign cabinet or sign structure.
(I.Q)shielded Lights: outdoor luminary shielded or constructed so that no light Ms
are emitted §)Lthe installed future at angles above the horizontal plane of the
luminary's opaque cover or shade.
c. Control of Glare.
All luminaries used for outdoor lighting shall be designed and installed to have their
lamp, reflector and reflector diffuser concealed from anv residential area or public
street. Luminaries mounted beneath canopies s, hall_be a flush-mount tvpe so t=at
they do not extend beneath the lower surface, of the canopy.
Direct lighting used for the purpose .of illuminating any sign hall be aimed or shielded
to meet this requirement.
d. Recreational Facilities.
Lighting of outdoor recreational facilities, such as, but not limited to, ball fields, tennis
courts, soccer fields, hockey or skating rinks, courses and golf -ball drives ranges
and special event or Play areas, shall meet the follawina -conditions:
1 } All fixtures used for such light ng shall be shielded or aimed to comply with this
ordinance as much as possible and be designed or provided with sharp cut -off
capability to minimize up- light, light spillover and glare. This code recognizes that
lighting of recreational facilities may require a certain amount of direct, outward
lighting to illuminate a vast area. .
f2l recreational- facility lighting is prohibited after 10:30 p.m., unless a later
completion time is approved by the city council
e G ndfathering of Nonconfor im Luminaries.
Luminaries lawfully in place before the effective date of the outdoor-lighting ordinance
shall be allpwed to remain. Such luminaries, however, are not exempt from compiyinc�
with the outdoor-1 ordinance that was in effect at the time of their installation. If
fixtures are rep laced laced as p art of agy construction re u rin_a building p ermit, the fixture
shall be upgraded to meet the requirements of this ordinance.
. Light Pole Heiaht Maximum.
The maximum height allowed for light ,doles shall be 25 feet Taller light poles may be
installed to replace existing poles that exceed 25 feet and for athletic field or
recreational lighting. The community design review board may allow taller liaht poles
as part of a . design review for nonresidential development based on appropriateness
for a specific p Staff may review lighting plans under the "minor construction"
provisions of Section 25-65 of the citv code.
cam. Photometric Plan Required.
The developer of any recreational, multiple- dwelling or nonresidential development
shall submit a photometric plan for review by the city when the Property t=
illuminated is abutting. across the street from or is near Dropenused or planned for
any type, of residential development. Specifically, this plan shall include:
Site and architectural plans indicating the location of the bMes of luminaries
proposed.
A detailed description of the luminary, including manufacturer's catalog cuts and
drawings including sections.
J31 A dram plan that illustrates the light spread and footcandle levels of the Proposed
luminaries.
h. Light - Intensity Maximum.
Outdoor lighting shall not exceed _ fo`o tcandles of light intensity at the property lines
on which the outdoor lights are installed.
i. Light Trespass.
All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, installed and maintained to prevent light
trespass. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall be installed and maintained to prevent d-
light from the luminary from hitting adiacent or nearby residential property. If such
condition should occur, the luminary shall be replaced, redirected or shielded to have
its light output controlled to eliminate light trespass or gl_
section 2. This amendment also adds Section 19-9(25) as follows (additions are underlined):
Sec. 19-9. same -- Affecting peace and safety.
The following are declared to be nuisances affecting public peace and safety:
Lights on any, building or proyerty that annoy or cause a nuisance to neighbor, ng
property owner, occupant or resident. For the..pumose o determining allowable
! jghting, the guidelines listed in Section 38- 28(c)(1) shall ap-Div.
Section 3. This amendment also changes. Section 25- 68(a)(8) as follows (additions are
underlined and deletions are crossed out):
Ali persons required. to submit building or remodeling plans under this- article shall submit. a
community design review board application form and the following written materials, as
applicable to the specific project and in sufficient quantities as determined by the board, to the
community design review board:
(a)(8) A detailed photometric plan
required by the outdoor lighting reguirements in Section 36 -28.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on , 2002.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes --
Nays -
0
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
FEBRUARY 12, 2002
a. Outdoor Lighting Ordinance
Ms. Finwall said the board has been working on the outdoor lighting ordinance
for the past year or so. Mr. Ekstrand has outlined the final comments in the staff
report. The largest change to the ordinance is the foot - candles cannot exceed .4
of Fight intensity at all property lines not just at residential property lines. The
lighting Ordinance also covers signs. Staff is looking for any additional comments
and once that is received, staff can bring it to the city council for the first reading
of this ordinance amendment.
Chairperson Ledvina said overall he is fine with the outdoor lighting ordinance.
Board member Jorgenson said there is room to grow with the ordinance but the
city can't take giant steps to change the lighting ordinance. But it is a good start.
Chairperson Ledvina said let's see how this ordinance works and the board will
get feedback from staff and they can see if anything needs to be added or
changed.
Board member Olson said she would assume that there are no other
metropolitan cities that have this type of lighting ordinance to compare to?
Chairperson Ledvina said he would not go that far.
Board member Olson said she would like to know if maybe Minneapolis or larger
cities have anything similar to what the City of Maplewood has adopted. Tom
Ekstrand found out about cities close to Maplewood but she would like to know
about larger areas. She would also like to know if Maplewood is the first city to
have this type of lighting ordinance. She doesn't want the city of Maplewood to
have the heaviest hammer in the whole state for a lighting ordinance.
Chairperson Ledvina said if the board approves this ordinance, he would like to
have some background information for the city council in their staff report. The
board did review other cities.
Board member Jorgenson asked if it would be possible to have staff ask Tina if
she would be available for a small discussion before the city council
meeting as a workshop. This would give the council a background on this
ordinance and maybe a packet as well.
Board member Olson said she would agree that would be an excellent idea.
Chairperson Ledvina said he would agree but he wonders if the council will give
Tina 15 or 20 minutes of council's time or not.
Board member Olson said she is anticipating that somebody is going to say that
here is another layer of government and more regulations. She wants to give the
lighting ordinance some type of background or support ahead of time.
Chairperson Ledvina said he anticipates that many of the city council
members will say , the city doesn't need it and it will cost money. He genuinely
feels that the changes and additions to the lighting ordinance far outweigh the
additional burden that it places on the development community and the people
that bring proposals to the city.
Ms. Finwall said she thinks the comments are good regarding the background
and ensuring that the city council understands there are other cities out there
doing similar things. She will revise the staff report and include background
information. Perhaps inviting Tina to the actual public hearing and to give a few
comments if she would. like to.
Board member Jorgenson moved to approve the changes to the outdoor lighting
ordinance recommended by community design review board.
Board member Olson seconded. Ayes — Jorgenson, Ledvina, Olson
The motion is passed.
AGEN13A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Mang & III I J J y' I Action by Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of P Re do Date
Endorsed
DATE: March 19, 2002 for the Marc 0 ity unci tin Madded
'
SUBJECT: Hazelwood Park Lighting Rejected
INTRODUCTION
The City of Maplewood received a $200,000 grant from Ramsey County for the acquisition
and installation of two new lighting systems for Hazelwood Park. Hazelwood Park is located at
the intersection of Hazelwood Avenue and County Road C, totaling 50 acres in size. It serves
as our primary soccer complex with seven fields, of which one large or two small fields are
currently lit.
BACKGROUND
Soccer is the fastest growing sport administered by our department. We currently have over
2,400 young people participating in our year -round soccer program which begins in the spring
and continues into November. Maplewood is fortunate to have had the vision 25 years ago to
construct a major soccer complex. We are one of the few suburban communities that has a
soccer complex of the quality and size that Hazelwood Park offers.
The grant from Ramsey County will provide the city the opportunity to light four additional
fields. The lighting will lengthen the season and more importantly, it will allow us greater
flexibility to "rest' the fields so uses can be rotated. One of the major problems that
Hazelwood Park experiences is that we are in effect loving our complex to death.
One of the major challenges that this project holds for the city is the close proximity of
residential properties. I have spoken with the abutting property owners and assured them that
we will make every effort to reduce light glare, noise and visual pollution. The neighbors have
been very supportive of this effort and at their request, we planted 20 conifers to buffer their
properties from the soccer fields. We have also indicated that play will not go beyond 10 p.m.
and there will be minimum .play involving lights on weekends and holidays.
Staff has spent a great deal of time researching light systems that would be appropriate for
Hazelwood Park. The premiere light system on the market today is Musco Lighting. Musco
has a strong reputation in the development of systems that provide maximum light control spill
and glare light, while maintaining quality and quantity of light on the field. The level eight
modification light structure reduces wasted spill light by up to 95 percent. In addition, they
have one of the best guarantees under their ten -year club service program, which provides all
materials and labor to maintain operation of the light structure system for ten years
guaranteed, including complete lamp replacement, regular monitoring, preventative and spot
maintenance and insured warranty fulfillment.
Staff has been working with city attorney Patrick Kelly to purchase the Musco light system
through the state competitive bid process. Musco currently has a contractual agreement with
the city of Rogers which permits the city to acquire football and soccer lighting through the
Hazelwood Park Lighting
March 19, 2002
Page 2
joint powers agreement which was approved by the Rogers city council on August 10, 2001.
Through this cooperative purchasing plan, which is authorized under Minnesota State Statute
471.59, the city of Maplewood is allowed to purchase the lighting system as specified under
the approved resolutions. The city of Roseville recently approved and purchased similar
lighting systems for their complex, as did the city of Brooklyn Center.
The cost to light the two southern fields is $81,766 and the two northern fields is $68,548.
The city council authorized under a previous contract TKDA Engineering to complete the
electrical designs.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the two resolutions as prepared by the city attorney to
purchase the Musco lighting systems via the city of Rogers for the separate field light
systems. The total low bid cost for the two southern fields is $68,548 and the two northern
fields cost is $81,766, as per the attached resolutions. The monies for this project will come
from the park development fund and the grant from Ramsey County.
kd\hzlight.mem
Enclosures
Mar-19-02 .03:06pm From-KELLY AND FAWCETT
6.512 23 6 0 1 a T -1 31 P - 02/05 F-899
:� jj ! IP - A
ly
'ATTORNEYS AT LAW
23,30 US 7BANCOR-F-MIRIM 40PRAY PLAZA
44411CS&M-STITM. ISIT,
sA ff PA' MJ MN I
PA.OUCK J KELLY Of C00MVI
SO L01f
u L) j � 0mg0$S MCGUIGAN HOLLY, P L
a.
_11 J � W1 T C bS 1 274-3751
'0
7 - .R
foe le ( oSI ) 1-23-8019
MOM L PAT-M
&Mad: admin@Kcllyma4wcea.com
Mar 19t 2002
Brye Anderson
I)izea, for of Pa*s: Ie=atiou
C
o`1 a1 _,VVC*d
1,890E. Co=
Mookwo NN 5511119
It
. Cit oVA Furthasin
DOW Mr. AWemn;
P, urmmi to Mj= Star. §471.59,, .quint Exercise Of Powers, two or MOre 8 0vS , - =4 atal units,, ma
V owers.1 - ft Ictement. be- MIT ulte states as follows 'T:
emer -into -a j*tut sp=lffi U t to WI
ztered� into thmu acTion of
Two or raorv. on al um,ts.,b � :
their over bodies,, ina jointl or coopmuveJ exercise- an power common
Bar-. c. - - inclu din those Ankh the
4% v ;oran
to
the C-0 IFIWq5.V8 Mles'
.1
some except for:.t,,h!ete-,m,,,'.tonl*,4,1 Ii ma exercised. The
all rowde
br ih e e=, ise;dfauch. powm b one or ml ore of the
c
u ipain
".—K.'af Of* w c t
IV
P on b U M, Mmbtf
wait.
Subd. 2 saes_
A Such a sM,, 11 state the purpose of the
A
thmm ,
4 orth ez.,power io . e ox=vi3ed it 11 prod de for the method by
which the pu g o t shall be acc d or the zr er in which the
power shall be,-.= =-, wised.
91 V.
Other c have entered into Joint Powers A =-u, specific4ll the followin to wit;
Cit of.-B w.okll C== Cit of Roseville
stewam, ille sthool Dist ct
Marm-14*02 02 Fromp -MILY AND 'FAKETT M1221801 0 T -131 P. 03/05 F -099
fir. Bruce Andomn
�� � mh l , 2002
l h we ions wihh ., C Of , M1 4 nn Cent. 7 s Jo ,h rl w, Supervisor Street
U air a r, , h vii i h .ve osinve i product as the
a ,t cif eat 1 `;A mm- '� � a�� � , of ers,
AS- L, i- ed you, 1 t - � of � e A � � E i� , (763) 428-2253,, with re-Sad to
� :. � � , n ;� .1,� MIRY q b City f + rs. For poses of
r!en� e, y for t City of
le ci . c : — em.
Also enclosed for �r+� � �' �ar�n��. please . &� ,, h ug � r { e following, to wit:
l . CITY Of AG , lution
. City ofRegory i in't Powers A enta
��o on: 'onizW .. O pi e; of 11 f elf lights f�� ���ee� Park -
Ci ofB � � 11� 'perk,
A enclosed; please- id � � epo solm' on- fer i of Map
TT j Pe&
Ik
3� h
CL
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF FIELD LIGHTS
FOR HAZELWOOD PARK
WHEREAS, the 2001 Capital Improvement Fund Budget includes $200,000 for the
purchase and installation of athletic field lights at the Hazelwood Park fields in accordance
with the city's park plan; and
WHEREAS, the city of Rogers, in cooperation with the Elk River School District has
initiated cooperative purchasing venture which includes an item for the cooperative
purchasing of athletic field lights; and
WHEREAS, the city of Maplewood may, through that cooperative venture, purchase
athletic field lights for the two southern fields for $81,766.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Maplewood,
Minnesota, that the purchase of athletic field lights and their installation through the city of
Rogers Cooperative Purchasing Venture in the amount of $81,766 is hereby approved.
Dated: March 25, 2002
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
By:
Its:
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF FIELD LIGHTS
FOR HAZE LWOOD PARK
WHEREAS, the 2001 Capital Improvement Fund Budget includes $200,000 for the
purchase and installation of athletic field lights at the Hazelwood Park fields in accordance
with the city's park plan; and
WHEREAS, the city of Rogers, in cooperation with the Elk River School District has
initiated cooperative purchasing venture which includes an item for the cooperative
purchasing of athletic field lights; and
WHEREAS, the city of Maplewood may, through that cooperative venture, purchase
athletic field lights for the two northern fields for $68,548.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Maplewood,
Minnesota, that the purchase of athletic field lights and their installation through the city of
Rogers Cooperative Purchasing Venture in the amount of $68,548 is hereby approved.
Dated: March 25, 2002
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
By:
Its:
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the city of Maplewood, a Minnesota municipal
corporation that the city of Maplewood is hereby authorized to enter into a Joint Powers
Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. 471.59 (Joint Exercise of Powers) for the purchase of
athletic field lights.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was offered by
moved its adoption and on due second by
the following vote:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Passed:
APPROVED:
was passed by
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
who
By:
Its: City Clerk
bax•t., W. 11 WO
' r t 3i33 � fang � r' fitp a b2�rk y �? i +fiS �ffr .���"S^``�'�., ra .. a � }y s ; ' S , •k i �� y �'
g'5�
a i ✓ �! � F Y r �4 � a' � r �" t�� } •c.�, 19 a��t� a r }` .....�.�
-�
[T
Y' - +. • ` 3'�'l.L
`.' y e n'� fat r t' _ .� � �; ,3�„ - t,.... •�.:. ' -b.
S i l'F ' �'_ ' �t�S
■� • • to r'. '"g a3`• t s r'�`.t.'S'°r Z, r + x' z
r
M usco s comprehensive foundation - oleto �rtr
.0
p
Al
' :FS 4'L' C ,' 3`t bt;
7 £ ..` t 't� '��-`��
warranty program assures you won t have to €$ `� `i
Y t a a 2 v '4sY to x,`^
- f akj4 nr"• 'g X
! ! n a + x Y C �• S5e � jti. e �a t .1a
z', `q.+?c'' -i .l t � '
• • ::. < Se ay4.7 x its 3E u�a�� ✓rr z•' � +
touch our l i g hting Y s stem for 10 ears x�ty�a� Y Y r Y° P try ,",4it�' {�'�x' f Wt-t " 3 "> ^i f zu `•g t iy "` ' '� `' �°' ,`.
Musco warrant provides: 4 fiA�r�.h �
RhI
. .
1 1a`' a v { } 1 r a�rot5 � E•(y, y � f �. Ei� . ,rt^�. i � f c mss. rz
■ n � �•' .� �} �� f;�}4.� tE ,ltt , i" ° a�` �a(�A a`3•ta 5u �i •a i`�s t i 4t `> r k
Complete relam i at the end of
� Ffn
p p g
z!Y �: -•�. ,,:2 �� ��':•• S a:,. ^�irS p,�`i'� t . �� � 3i � t" s•t# a r k # t a,, �'z�,.
useful lam life or t the n
p a e e d of is r ara�: �� ���� ,..� •�f: t,� <��; r k�y�'�,.t., • ��� fi ��- �� �� � A� r
� ,'; �.. • q� t. !o ii? a .. * �fr'v 9 � i.�t ,F� �,'a�' � .y� x 'l� ' '�7� + " , a� ; T ! - a 'a w�i" e � ,t ..rS v F ';;:1 c . 4, ' ?z C a py
A 3 � �'t'• +` i' ° y _Ma. y. r� A .fixx Liy... ".. ,¢ �.. A F L 2 t.. * • a t£'^.kL fig•. crf+n. F;u ��5' }, ,r.
. fit.: � � L e l$ - .tsu ,},'X+T +3ixa , a y.YVa;.. 'e ��. w's+ 6 + + �K t4�� r�,�:.. - f �.;.fi "
— e,j ..� � - �y^••' _ � F �' S ?. �•>�,e sc, f�. ,�. �?+4 ;r '�S ; �' , :E•✓3: � � PIN
the 10 ear warrant y
Y „/ �'. Jay y� "&t' ,°i° d%p 'a?'" k"" adz a t d�: '�• � t'�` '' "' _ x
f:
k.l}'a^`Yya y .i;.ra`+ Y:' zya?3 AJ {,..
ys'::n y.. ��. i'A. ��,w,�f a•,a +<,�.r• ,ry�t� -E� s `�..' fi Pz`p`' st I.er: ,,,.� r s
■ ■ p'v't�
Re your
.�'
• ular monitoring of
g g �,.
• •
lighting system 5 _ F
'mss: � -: .,_ _ -?,:. `• � •;s ��+�� 'xcr� f•� a+t ` a�'; r nr'�. � r -� i,3 .�'�'•�� k �
r a +' pia .k p�
w. 7 v s t �t�1rj -r i
• E kr�* a•��t.� ?J {�3�: 'C'�E x #2^'.2
•
Preventa
a e and spot maintenance r
t .. ......
�` �� � x'y +' N .�� + ra � � � 4 v . 1"y xS l y �X 'fie .ei Cdr k
Prevent � * �� 4 1 l• ?,, wi^.x - ',t�,q�7.�"��� �+��l,.- a "t :;.
d rf a, s3 ACS `y4+• 3 } '�{ 9 �Sr� � cY� ��3 }� � G`}, ^5 g..
. yk `°'
t{ r4 +;'; � � .r �
�� p�t�� '.§�'�
as needed, i nclud i ng parts and labor�k Y
includi
a '� +• r,,` ..t ' `: � n �a a l l- a� fi i '`. U {,°✓ 3 y h i_'t" ;
7 < v S tr' ' + >, ''i4 f. +r{ ` `` t ..a t 7- 'Et3' r
' • ,t m'„ .
Insured warranty fulfillment underwritten by a i}i
`. ;
r >. '
i
top -rated i nsurance company f
3
' r •'� ?nr x"+ n � ?t r t .._ k R
3. t }zY y�S
a ' ;gam
r t y r f.
` r � S c, �� v �^E'r , d • 'Y, k '{ s eye � r v Y � �`� .fez -'S `
r
CITY OF ROGERS
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT,
SPECIFICATIONS AND BIDDER'S PROPOSAL FOR COOPERATIVE
BIDDING OF VARIOUS ATHLETIC FACILITIES LIGHTING
WITHIN THE
STATE OF MI14NESOTA
AND
JOINT POWER AGREEMENT
BY
OTHER GOVERNMEENTAL ENTITIES
2001 COMMUNITY PARIS EMPROVEMENT PROJECT
PUBLIC OPENING OF THIS BID
will take place at Rogers City Hall
12913 Main Street
Rogers, MN 55374
ON
FRIDAY, AUGUST 10, 2001
BIDDER'S NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY OF ROGERS
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING
JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS (Minnesota State Statute 471.59)
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to `Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 (Joint Exercise of
Powers), the City of Rogers has the legal authority to enter into an agreement, through
actions of their governing body, to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power
common to the contracting powers or any similar powers, including those which are
the same' except for territorial limits within which they may be exercised; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement are of the opinion that the formation of this
agreement to administer the terms of this agreement are in the best interest of their
respective governmental units;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES AND
AGREEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES DO AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
This proposal, is a contract that maybe applied to other governmental units for the
purchase of additional quantities of the equipment specified in this proposal in
accordance with Minnesota State Statute 471.59 Joint Exercise of Powers, and State
Statute hereby included in and a part of this proposal. In the event the City of Rogers
enters an agreement with other governmental units for the purchase of additional
equipment all aspects of this proposal shall apply unless otherwise stated by the bidder
in an attachment affixed with this proposal. Instructions to Bidder of these General
Provisions. Any applicable reference to the City of Rogers in this proposal shall apply
to any other governmental t(s) entering an agreement with the City of Rogers and
any applicable reference to governmental unit(s) in this proposal shall apply to the
City of Rogers, in accordance with these general provisions.
1. BIDS AND AWARDS
It is understood and agreed that the City of Rogers, pursuant to the terms of the
Agreement and in accordance with its established practices and the laws governing
purchases by the City of Rogers, shall solicit bids, and shall tabulate, evaluate, and
discuss with any other governmental unit that may enter into this Agreement or a
substantiall y similar agreement with City of Rogers, all bids received pursuant to such
solicitations. The City of Rogers shall make an award on behalf of itself and all such
participating governmental units to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder
responding to the solicitation for bids upon majority agreement of the authorized
representative of all such participating governmental units. This award shall establish
the prices and estimated quantities to be purchased by each of the parties hereto
included in such award in accordance with this Agreement. The parties shall be liable
for any orders placed by them in accordance with this agreement, but shall not be
liable for any other sums.
2. ORDERS, DELIVERY AND PAYMENT
After the award is made for the estimated quantities of items, designed pursuant to this
Joint Powers Agreement, each of the parties hereto agrees to order from the successful
bidder such quantities as shall be consistent with its needs. Each party agrees to make
arrangements with the successful bidder for ordering, delivery, shipment, and payment
with respect to the items it wishes to order. All disbursements of public funds by any
of the parties in payment for such items shall be made in accordance with all laws of
the State of Minnesota and of the party making such disbursement. All parties must
provide for the strict accountability of all funds employed hereunder, in accordance
with the rules and regulations such party ordinarily applies with respect to such funds.
4. LIABILITY OF THE CITY OF ROGERS
The City of Rogers shall endeavor in good faith to maintain a high degree of
efficiency with respect to any services provided hereunder; however, the sole and
exclusive remedy for any breach of this agreement by the City Administrator and the
City of Rogers' liability of any kind whatsoever, including but not limited to liability
for late, negligent or nonperformance or for any respect regarding its herein
obligations, shall be limited to correcting diligently any such deficiency as is
reasonably possible under the pertinent circumstances. Furthermore, the City of
Rogers does not warrant product quality or service.
If lower prices are offered to Political Subdivisions by a vendor on subsequent annual
contracts or price agreements, that same pricing structure must be extended to the City
of Rogers on existing comparable contracts which the vendor may have in effect with
the state of the time. Failure to comply may result in cancellation of the State.
Additional surety bond(s) in the amount of no less that 5% of the amount of the price
quoted for this unit shall be required at the discretion of any other governmental unit
entering into this agreement' for equipment ordered. Said bond(s) shall be delivered
within 10 calendar days of placement of order.
It is the City of Rogers intent that the duration of the Cooperative Purchasing or Joint
Powers provisions of this Contract be from the initial purchase order date to a period
of 24 months.
Agreements entered into under this law must be by an action, normally a resolution, of
the governing body of the city soliciting the bid or quotation, and the governing body
of the city wishing to make the purchase under the bid or quotation. A copy of a
resolution is supplied for an example.
Agenda #
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Cler
DATE: March 18, 2002
RE: Liquor License Application - 5 -8 Tavern & Grill
Introduction
by► council
D
ed
Modified
Dejected
A
The owner's of 5 -8 Tavern & Grill, 2289 Minnehaha Avenue, have applied for an intoxicating
liquor license. This is the former site of Beau's Lounge.
Backiround
As required by City ordinances, the necessary background investigations were completed by the
Police Department and there was nothing found that would preclude the applicant's from holding
a license in the City. The on -site manager will be James Emison
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the liquor license application.
AG ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: County Road D Improvements, City Project 01 -15
1. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids
2. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll
3. Resolution Ordering Assessment Hearing
4. Resolution Approving No Parking Restriction
DATE: March 18, 2002
Introduction
"on by Council
lmodiW
Final plans and specifications for the above referenced project have been completed by the city's
consultant, URS, and are ready to be advertised for bids. The proposed bid opening for this project
is scheduled for 10:00 a.m., Friday, April 19 2002. Award of bids would be considered by the city
council at the April 22, 2002, city council meeting.
Following the approval to advertise for bids, the next step in the improvement process is to prepare
the assessment roll and order the assessment hearing. In addition, the city council shall consider a
no parking requirement to meet state aid standards.
Background
The amounts to be assessed are not directly dependent on the actual amount of the bid, rather on a
predetermined assessment rate established in the city's pavement management policy. The method
of assessment is the same as was outlined in the feasibility study. A completed assessment roll is
available in the office of the city clerk and city engineer. It is recommended that the assessment
hearing be scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, April 22, 2002.
The proposed County Road D project has been designed to widths that will not permit parking at any
location between White Bear Avenue and McKnight Road. Due to the design and funding
requirements set on state aid projects, no parking requirements must be set by council resolution.
Special event parking needs can be addressed on a case -by -case basis.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the four attached resolutions for County
Road D Improvement, Project 01 -15: Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids, Ordering the
Preparation of the Assessment Roll, Ordering the Assessment Hearing and Approving No
Parking Restriction.
CIVIC
jw
Attachments
RESOLUTION
APPROVING PLANS
ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on January 28,
. rY
2002, plans and specifications for County Road D, from White Bear Avenue to
McKnight Road, Project 01 -15, have been prepared by (or under the direction of ) the
city engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for
approval, and
WHEREAS, the storm water pond proposed along the south side of County
Y
Road D provides design features that meet and exceed the intent of the city's NURP
Y
Pond Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the proposed road width of 28 feet does not meet city ordinance
requirements but is required to calm traffic.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the
city clerk.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper
and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify
p fY
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered b the
Y
council at 10:00 a.m., on the 19th day of April, 2002, at the city hall and that no bids
shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a
certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five
percent of the amount of such bid.
3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to
receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to
tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a
contract, at the regular city council meeting of April 22, 2002.
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer will receive bids for the improvement
of County Road D, City Project g 1 -15.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith
calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against
every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without
regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and' they shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in the city office for inspection.
FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify
the council thereof.
RESOLUTION
ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING
WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council,
prepared an assessment roll for the construction of County Road D, City Project 01 -15,
and the said assessment is on file in the office of the city clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
I. A hearing shall be held on the 22 day of April, 2002, at the city hall at
7:00 p. m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time, and place all
persons owning property affected by such improvement will be iven an opportunity to
g pp Y
be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks
prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all ro ert affected b said
p p Y Y
assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the
general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed -
assessment roll is on file with the clerk and that written or oral objections will be
considered.
� MINNESOTA DEPART M.- ENT OF TILAN
THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
RAMSEY COUNTY
ACTIO PLAN FOR GRADING, AGGREGATE BASE, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, 8{TUMlINOUS PEDI
STORM SEWER, UTIUlY IMPROVEMENTS AND LANDSCAPING
ATED Oft COUNTY ROAD D NTW m WHITE _ BEAR AVE A ID McKNIGHT ROAD tteopropMe Deaarlptloni
COUNTY ROAD D IMPROVEMENTS
CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2001=15
COUNTY ROAD D - WHITE BEAR AVE. TO McKNIGHT RD.
STATE AS PROD. NO. 138 - 1 21 - 02
GROSS - LENGTH 3290.71 FEET
BRIDGE- LENGTH 0 FEET
EXCEPTIONS - - LENGTH 0 FEET
NET - LENGTH 3290.71 FEET
COUNTY Rnen n
DE8101 DE61MAT KIA
COUNTY ROAD D S.A.P. 138 - 121 -02)
INDEX MAP______
STA. 0+00 (BEGIN PROJECT) TO STA. 32 +90.71
FuNGlIORd ClOselflosUm .'B' MINOR ARTERIAL
ML of Trattle Lanc
2 No. of Pwkft Luc 0
ADT !Current Yowl 2002 • 5,200 Donn Spend 35 "h
ADT Future Yowl 2022
* 6,760 saved on PUMPING 3kht Dietenoo
DNY U)S1P Mr. You
s N.A. lielaht of e y e 3.5 M*%M of Object •5
D Ifteegenel DhtrJ
• -SO - % DeolIp Speed not achieved ate NZA
T 81eavy Cowrneram
■ 7.1 % STA. TO STA. mwh N A
STA. TO STA. reph N/A
CROSS —SEC _
STA. TO STA. n*h NSA
R - Yal" 30
20 YR ESALS _1,.262,000 Design Load _. IQ ton
COUNTY ROAD D
-eT0
'NOT foR CON
F PLAN REVISONS
DATE I SHEET NO. I -
STATE AID PROD_ NO_ - 138-
0
INDEX MAP______
F
SCAU
0
ALIGNMENT_
F
SCALI
0
PLAN
�
SCAU
0
PROFILE
en
SCAM
0
CROSS —SEC _
SCALD
PROJECT LO
RAMSEY
CI
METRO
F PLAN REVISONS
DATE I SHEET NO. I -
STATE AID PROD_ NO_ - 138-
AGENDA ITEM /0 3
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Introduction
Richard Fursman, City Manager
Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
Acton by Council
Date
ndvd
ogled
Re jecte-
Markham Pond Outlet Improvements, Project 02 -02
Resolution Approving Preliminary Report and Calling Public Hearing
March 18, 2002
A draft report, with detailed costs and financing plans, is complete and available for review at the
office of the city engineer. Final copies of the study will be made available prior to the public
hearing. It is recommended that the council consider accepting the feasibility study and
ordering a public hearing for April 8, 2002.
Background
The attached map shows the subject property. This parcel, which is currently undeveloped, is
bisected by County Ditch No. 18, which is the city's outlet for Markham Pond. Mr. Robert Tillges is
proposing to develop the property with a medical office building. Mr. Tillges has petitioned the city
for the crossing of the outlet to be controlled by a public improvement project. The southwestern
corner of Mr. Tillges' parcel includes a small 4,900 square foot parcel of city -owned property. The
city originally retained this parcel for a lift station that has since been abandoned. It is proposed
that this parcel be sold to Mr. Tillges to enhance the property development.
The process for considering Mr. Tillges' request is through the preparation of a preliminary
report. The report considers the cost of the improvements along with a financing plan. The
financing plan includes assessments to Mr. Tillges' property along with any city assistance. The
report will be presented to the city council for consideration at the public hearing.
Discussion
This is a development project that typically would not include city involvement, however; the
Markham Pond outlet is critical to the city's storm drainage system and should be a public
improvement project. The excess parcel is necessary for the development and is advantageous
for the city to remove from public ownership.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution accepting the
report and calling fora public hearing. for 7:15 p.m., April 8, 2002, for the Markham Pond
Outlet Improvements, Project 02 -02.
RCA
jw
Attachments
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS,. pursuant to resolution of the council adopted January 11, 2002, a report has
been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of the
Markham Pond Outlet and Utility Improvements, City Project 02 -02, and this report was received
by the council on March 25, 2002, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost - effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such storm pond outlet and utility
improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a
portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an
estimated total cost of the improvement of $85,000.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 8th day of
April, 2002, in the council chambers of city hall at 7:15 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and
published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
COUNTY ROAD D
l
61 6�
n
O�
O
I. SUMMIT CT. ST. JOHN'S � fi `
2. GOUNTRYVIEW CIR. BLVD.
3. DULUTH CT.
D c~n Z
Z cn
LLI
BEA M
a AVE.
n r
19 ,;
a r .. RADATZ Q
Q h MESABI
a
MorP�am ;�
a� 0 cr _ nd � RAMSEY �
w = f COUNTY
�..,• ��� f �' COURT
KOHLMAN v AVE. C) '"°. °�` Y KOHLMAN
601
Q North o AVE.
E : C) 2 Hazelwood
(n j Park t Z 3
ROAD
ao
Project location
no scale
Project Location
AGENDA ITEM
AGE NDA REPORT Action by Council
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: R. Charles Ahl, Director of Public. Works /City Engineer
SUBJECT:
Date
'Endorsed
Mimed
Lift Station Number 2 Abandonment Improvement, City Project 00 -11:
Approve Project Plans and' Authorize Receipt of Bids
DATE: March 18, 2002
Introduction
The city's sanitary sewer utility has been conducting a long -range plan to abandon lift stations for a
more cost effective gravity flow system. The last lift station abandonment project is the elimination of
Lift Station Number 2. Project plans have been prepared and are available for inspection in the
office of the city engineer. Approval of the plans and authorization to receive bids is recommended
from the city council.. The proposed bid opening for this project would be scheduled for 10:00 a.m.,
Friday, April 12, 2002. Award of bids would be considered by the city council at the April 22, 2002,
city council meeting.
Background
The proposal to replace Lift Station Number 2 is part of a program started within the sanitary sewer
utility many years ago. Lift stations are very labor- intensive mechanical devices that are subject to
failure due to power outages and material blockages. The proposed improvements would eliminate
Lift Station Number 2, which is located at East Shore Drive, south of Frost Avenue. Construction
cost for the gravity sewer line that is needed along the southern shore of Lake Phalen, extending
westerly to T.H. 61, estimated at $265,600. The payoff for the construction cost is approximately
14 years, although there is no cost consideration applied to service problems and sewer backups
due to failure of the lift station.
Budget Impact
In November 2000, the city council approved a budget of $200,000 to be paid from the sewer utility
fund. The project was delayed in 2001 due to coordination issues with the Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services approval and coordination with Ramsey County and St. Paul Parks over final
sewer routing. An additional appropriation of $65,600 from the utility fund is necessary for this
project to proceed. Funds are available within the fund for this project.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the_ city council approve the attached resolution approving the project
plans and authorizing the receipt of bids for the Lift Station Number 2 Abandonment
Improvement Project, City Project 00 -11.
RCA
jw
Attachments: Resolution
Site Map
RESOLUTION
APPROVING PLANS
ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, plans and specifications for the Lift Station Number 2 Abandonment
Improvement, City Project 00 -11, have been prepared by Howard R. Green Company, the city's
consultant engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part
hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the
Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such
approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least three weeks
before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be
publicly opened and considered by the council at 10:00 a.m., on the 12th day of April, 2002, at the
city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied
by certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the
amount of such bid.
3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open,
and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received.
The council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of
April 22, 2002.
4. A budget adjustment of $65,600 is hereby approved- from the Utility Fund to bring the
total project cost to $265,600.
i
i
0 .
3�
w vT 'q • •
A, # .
:s� : �s #��
3� :fi „y�..y3 �.�3.' a. � ^; ..�i•X•t. _r,..
...t F � � h�. "3ft -'v �- • .s�J. ��. ``�:aw x"Fi Iiu - 1 %r,:.r:
'- 'f.'
'3
y
C u m
s.
�� S.A .,
r��►� r�� +r�r��Ii±�++��rral�!��I�II�!�
NO we
PS
Like P l�rt
Re ,f Park
PROJECT
TION
Howard R. Gr(
DA
rren ni c • 0 4 ntl.Ar% A Q1 7nAn_cITC mitt toTu _
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION. OR REPORT N
`
DESIGNED BY: BT DRAWN BY: TE W
NO. D
DATE B
BY R
REVISION DESCRIPTION
AGENDA ITSM
__.J
To:
From:
Subj:
Date:
Bruce Anderson,
Pauline Staples
City News /etteA
3 -14 -2002
Action b (
Date
Endorsed
Modified,,,.,,,,,,,,,
Rel axed......,, - --•.�►
Discussion
The City of Maplewood newsletter is published 12 times a year and its major objective
is to provide important news and activities to residents in a timely. manner. The city
newsletter is one of the most visible publications produced by the City of Maplewood.
The government news section has eight issues per year that deal strictly with city news,
city projects, city council action, development projects, etc. The recreation section has
four issues per year that include extensive park and recreation program offerings.
There are three objectives that were established for the new improved Maplewood in
Motion format:
1.) Improve delivery of material presented to residents thru better layout,
the use of color and photographs.
2.) To reduce article content thus reducing the size of the newsletter and
using the web page as backup for additional information on articles.
3.) To sell advertising within the Parks and Recreation newsletter four times
per year to reduce the cost of the publications.
The city news will be 4 pages, 4 color and produced eight times per year. The format
will be considerable different from the Maplewood in Motion format. Articles will be
more concise and abbreviated. The park and recreation issues will be 1 issue at 52
pages and 3 issues at 32 pages, 4 color on the cover and 2 color printing inside.
Articles will be also very concise and abridged. (Copies attached for your reference)
Budget
The 2002 approved public relations budget is $66,460.00. The revised 2002 budget
that would produce the new newsletter is $79,,972.00 that results in a difference of
$13,512.00. The total of $ include printing and postage.
There is a difference of $13,512.00 to generate. We propose to go out to local
businesses for advertising in the publication. I have included the ad spec price sheet
that quotes the prices for the different size ads and the difference between b/w and
color. Ads would be geared toward the family. We would design the ads for the
-2-
individuals that would be interested in publicizing in our publication. A list of potential
advertisers is attached.
There are other municipalities that have been securing advertisers in their City
publications to help offset publication /mailing budgets -they include Inver Grove
Heights, Plymouth, St. Louis Park. Majority of other municipalities also have changed
their publications to include two or four color printing.
Recommendation
We have produced the first issue of the new format of City News and Parks and
Recreation and received several positive comments on the updated look and extensive
program offerings. We produced this publication totally in -house utilizing our marketing
specialist and top of the line marketing /publishing software.
We believe that we can generate the $ in our first year of advertising sales
which will make up for the increased cost of the publication.
For the first time ever, the City of Maplewood is offering businesses the opportunity to
place ads in the Parks and Recreation publication. This 112WIy t"2Va11'lped, quarterly booklet
w►ii have a 4 -C glossy cover and will reveal all of the latest events, activities, and
programs offered by the Maplewood Parks and Recreation Department which include: the
Community Center and Nature Center. Also inserted in this issue is the "City News" which
includes valuable information happening in the city.
Distribution
• 17,300 issues mailed out to the Maplewood Residents
• 3,000 overruns distributed at The Maplewood
Community Center and The Maplewood City Hall
Advertising Deadlines
June Issue: April 22
September Issue: July 22
December Issue: October 21
March Issue: Undetermined
And
The cost of your ad includes design and two proofs.
2002
Advertising I.nformation
Premium Ad Space-
Half Pa 4-C $695 B&W $595
Back Cover 4-C $425
(2 314 I- x 4")
For more information, contact
Heidi Hersom at 651.779.3543 or
HE I D I. FIE RSOM@C I. M A PLEWOOD.MN.LJS
I
4'f Ad
(5 x 2 ")
4-C $295
B&W $225
3 Ad
4-C $21
B&W $175
511 Ad
4-C $325
B&W $250
10" Ad
(5' x 5")
4-C $595
B&W $495
Advertise in all
four issues and
receive 10% OFF!
Potiential Advertisers
Minn Photo
Papa John's Pizza
Cinder's Greenhouse
Old Country Buffet
Maplewood Bakery
Cub Foods
Edina Realty
Gulden's Restaurant
Rainbow Foods
Target
Paper Warehouse
Sam's Club
Dick Blick
Hejny Rental
Ace Hardware
Keller Golf Course
Best Western
Strauss Skate
Goodwill
Spartan Specialities
Sports Conditioning at The Grove
with "P.A.S,S. the Competition"
Enhance your power, agility, speed, strength, and
quickness with comprehensive Elite Sports
Performance Training for teams and individuals.
"P.A.S.S. (Power, Agility, Speed, Strength) the
Competition is an innovative sports- training
program that focuses on the overall development and
conditioning of athletes so they can achieve the best performance possible. The
program focuses on developing the movements needed for optimal performance
specific to your sport. This training extends beyond technical skills developed
through coaching and practice, providing an element of training that pushes. you
to the next level and beyond. Injury prevention is also stressed in this program.
For more information, please contact Kristen Lehman, P.A.S.S. Sports Training
Specialist, at 952- 469 -5568.
Your one-sto-P bankin center
SaArxjs i► Checkng Ac!
CDs& .
kbt & Constmdion Lcans
Fbme gy Loam s.. Ar
BusinEm Ram & Lcam
* 244-1wr ATM ..-
MastefAm
244+ TdephoneBaMng
Spring Contest:
Climb Mount Grove
This personal fitness challenge is
designed to help Fitness Center users
reach their peak in fitness. In addition
to weekly fitness challenges, you'll get
specialized strength - training and
cardiovascular programs to help you
achieve your goals. The "Climb
Mount Grove" contest is open to
members and nonmembers who visit
The Grove's Muscle beach. This
challenge is designed for your personal
benefit — you are not competing
against other participants. Results are
based on overall personal improvement.
The contest starts March 1. The one -
week enrollment period begins
February 18 and ends February 25.
Results should be turned in as you
complete them, with all results due
prior to June 1. Prizes may include
Grove cash, water bottles, T-shirts,
towels, gift certificates, and that all -
important "right to boast."
At the time of enrollment, you need
to contact a member of the fitness
staff to complete and turn in the
following:
1. Initial measurements that
include a personal fitness
assessment that tests all
five components of fitness (body
composition, cardiovascular
endurance, muscular strength,
muscular endurance, and
flexibility) . The same Personal
Trainer will perform the before -
and -after measurements to
ensure consistency.
2. A photograph will be taken at
this time as well.
3. Participants need to write a short
essay addressing the following
question: What is your idea of a
healthy individual?
4. Pay the enrollment fee. of $50
for members and $80 for non-
members.
More details will be available at Guest
Services in February.
' 10 www .ci.inver- grove- heights.mn.us
Policy Regulating Advertisements in City Publications
The City of Maplewood strives to keep all residents informed of city policies and
programs thru several city publications. To help offset the cost of printing publications,
such as the Parks and Recreation brochures, the City periodically solicits advertisements
from area businesses. The City of Maplewood establishes the following policy for
accepting advertisement in city publications.
Advertising Content Policy
1. Given the negative public health and safety ramifications associated with the
use of liquor and in particular, the state and local laws regarding liquor and
minors, the City will not accept advertisements which relate to or promote the
use of liquor.
2. Given the negative public health impact of tobacco usage on the public health,
the City will not accept advertisements which relate to or promote the use of
tobacco products in its publications.
3. Advertising for businesses that are in the primary business of selling liquor and
tobacco products will not be accepted.
4. Advertisements that are libelous or obscene will not be accepted.
5. In addition to businesses, the City will accept advertisements from civic groups
providing they meet the above guidelines:
♦ The City of Maplewood is part of a joint powers agreement of the
organization submitting the advertisement.
♦ The organization submitting the advertisement receives funding
from the City of Maplewood.
♦ The organization purchasing the advertisement has a city
appointed representative serving on its board of directors.
♦ The organization purchasing the advertisement is another
government agency offering services or programs to the
citizens of Maplewood.
The City Marketing /Public Relations Specialist shall implement this advertising policy.
Persons aggrieved by this policy may ask that decisions of the Marketing /Public
Relations Specialist be reviewed by the City Manager.