HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 11-14 City Council Packet
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, November 14, 2011
City Hall, Council Chambers
Meeting No. 22-11
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1. Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country.
C. ROLL CALL
Mayor’s Address on Protocol:
“Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all
discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public
Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and
Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. Before addressing
the council, sign in with the City Clerk. At the podium please state your name and
address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and
Council. The Mayor will then direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond
to comments.”
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of October 24, 2011, City Council Workshop Minutes
2. Approval of October 24, 2011, City Council Meeting Minutes
F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
G. CONSENT AGENDA – Items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and non-
controversial and are approved by one motion of the council. If a councilmember requests
additional information or wants to make a comment regarding an item, the vote should be held
until the questions or comments are made then the single vote should be taken. If a
councilmember objects to an item it should be removed and acted upon as a separate item.
1. Approval Of Claims
2. Approval of 2011 Budget Adjustments and Transfers
3. Approval of 2012 Contract with Alan Kantrud for Attorney Services
4. Approval of 2012 Animal Control Contract
5. Approval of Resolution Adopting Ambulance Rates for 2012
6. Approval of Resolution Accepting State Aid Advancement Funds
7. Approval of Resolution Authorizing MN/DOT Agency Agreement
8. Approval of Resolution of Donation to the Fire Department from Chris Larson
9. Approval of Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Unpaid Ambulance Bills
10. Approval of Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Unpaid Miscellaneous Charges
11. Approval of Resolution Temporary Gambling Permits for Ramsey Nursing Home
Foundation
12. Approval of Purchase of Two Submersible Sewage Pumps for Lift Station #6
13. Approval of Purchase of Toolcat 5610 F-Series Work Machine
14. Approval of Installation of No-Parking Signs at Mayhill Road & 7th Street
15. Approval of Installation of Stop Signs at Sandhurst Avenue & Kennard Street
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS- Public Hearings will Be Held at 7:00 p.m. or Thereafter
1. 2012 Mill and Overlay Improvements, Project 11-15
a. Public Hearing
b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes)
2. Holloway and Stanich Highlands Area Improvements, Project 09-13
a. Re-Assessment Hearing
b. Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll
3. Ordinance Amendment of Section 2-41 - City Council Authority to Consider Variances
from the Zoning Code (First Reading)
4. Ordinance Amendment of Section 44-13 - City Council Authority to Consider Variances
from the Zoning Code (First Reading)
5. Ordinance Amendment of Section 44-14 - Allowing Reduction in Lot Sizes and Building
Setbacks When Streets are Widened (First Reading)
6. Ordinance Amendment of Article VI - Allowing Staff to Consider Minor Variances for Single
and Double Dwellings (First Reading)
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Approval of Contract for Auditing Services
2. Trash Collection System Analysis
a. Review of Draft Contract Between the City of Maplewood and Allied Waste Services
for Residential Trash Collection Service
b. Notice of 90-Day Negotiation Period End Date on November 21, 2011
c. Review of Tennis Sanitation, LLC, Proposal for Improvements to City’s Existing Open
Trash Collection System
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval of Wetland Buffer Waiver for Joy Park Ditch Maintenance
2. Approval of Resolution Canvassing the Results of the November 8, 2011 Municipal
General Election
3. Approval to Expend Funds to Refurbish a Fire Vehicle
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
L. AWARD OF BIDS
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
N. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The
request for this must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk’s Office at 651.249.2001 to
make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings
– elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard
and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is
understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep
emotions in check and use respectful language.
October 24, 2011
City Council Manager Workshop Minutes
1
Agenda Item E1
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
MANAGER WORKSHOP
5:15 p.m., Monday, October 24, 2011
Council Chambers, City Hall
A. CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order
at 5:17 p.m. by Mayor Rossbach.
B. ROLL CALL
Will Rossbach, Mayor Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
James Llanas, Councilmember Present
John Nephew, Councilmember Present
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Llanas moved to approve the agenda as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Nephew Ayes – All
The motion passed.
D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Update of 2011 Expenditures and Revenues
Assistant City Manager Ahl presented the staff report and answered questions of the
council.
2. Trash Collection System Analysis – Existing Open Hauling System
Environmental Planner Finwall presented the staff report and answered questions of the
council. Mike Berkopec, Vice Chair, from the Minnesota Chapter of the National Solid
Waste Management Association addressed the council and answered questions of the
council. Willie Tennis from Tennis Sanitation addressed the council and answered
questions of the council.
E. NEW BUSINESS
None.
F. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rossbach adjourned the meeting at 6:58 p.m.
Packet Page Number 1 of 259
October 24, 2011
City Council Meeting Minutes
1
Agenda Item E2
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, October 24, 2011
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 21-11
A. CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order
at 7:12 p.m. by Mayor Rossbach.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Will Rossbach, Mayor Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
James Llanas, Councilmember Present
John Nephew, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Juenemann added agenda item N1 Code Enforcement.
Councilmember Nephew added agenda items N2 Cable Commission and N3 Maplewood
Monthly.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the agenda as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of October 5, 2011 City Council Workshop Minutes
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the October 5, 2011 City Council Workshop
Minutes as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
2. Approval of October 10, 2011 City Council Workshop Minutes
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the October 10, 2011 City Council Workshop
Minutes as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
3. Approval of October 10, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Llanas moved to approve the October 10, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes as
submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Packet Page Number 2 of 259
October 24, 2011
City Council Meeting Minutes
2
F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
1. 3M Presentation, Thomas J. Heim, Director of Administrative Services
City Planner Mike Martin presented the staff report and introduced Thomas J. Heim, Director of
Administrative Services for 3M. Mr. Heim presented the report on 3M renovations and answered
questions of the council.
G. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Juenemann highlighted item G3 Approval of Summary Publication – Renewable
Energy Ordinance.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve agenda items G1 thru G6.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
1. Approval of Claims
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Approval of Claims.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 119,059.63 Checks # 85347 thru # 85393
dated 10/6/11 thru 10/11/11
$ 966,420.13 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 9/28/11 thru 10/6/11
$ 426,428.02 Checks # 85394 thru # 85449
dated 10/11/11 thru 10/18/11
$ 178,222.67 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 10/7/11 thru 10/13/11
$ 1,690,130.45 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$ 497,732.68 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits
dated 10/14/11
$ 2,375.01 Payroll Deduction check # 9984959 thru # 9984961
dated 10/14/11
$ 500,107.69 Total Payroll
$ 2,190,238.14 GRAND TOTAL
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Packet Page Number 3 of 259
October 24, 2011
City Council Meeting Minutes
3
2. Approval of Conditional Use Permit Review – Xcel Substation, 1480 County Road D
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit Review for Xcel
Substation located at 1480 County Road D.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
3. Approval of Summary Publication – Renewable Energy Ordinance
Environmental Planner Finwall presented the staff report and answered questions of the council.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Summary Publication for the Renewable Energy
Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 914
Renewable Energy Ordinance
On October 10, 2011, the Maplewood City Council adopted an ordinance which creates
regulations for wind turbines, solar systems, and geothermal ground-source heat pumps. The
City strongly encourages increased energy conservation and improved energy efficiency, but also
finds that increased use of appropriate renewable energy systems will be an important part of
improving urban sustainability. The ordinance will encourage renewable energy systems that
have a positive impact in energy conservation, with limited adverse impact on the community. A
summary of the ordinance follows:
Wind
Large Wind Energy Conversion Systems: Ground mounted large wind energy conversion
systems (WECS) of equal to or greater than 100 kW in total nameplate generating capacity and
up to 125 feet in height and roof mounted large WECS are allowed with approval of a conditional
use permit in the following properties: commercial or industrial zoned properties, multiple
dwelling residential or planned unit development zoned properties (for shared energy production
among the properties), government or institution guided properties.
Small Wind Energy Conversion Systems: Ground mounted small WECS of less than 100 kW in
total nameplate generating capacity and up to 60 feet in height and roof mounted small WECS
are a permitted use in any zoning district, with the exception of small ground mounted WECS in
residential zoning districts that require approval from 100 percent of surrounding property owners
prior to construction.
WECS Standards: The ordinance allows 1 large or small ground mounted WECS on a single lot
up to 5 acres and 1 large or small ground mounted WECS per 5 acres of land area thereafter.
The ordinance also specifies regulations for placement, design, and general standards for all
WECS.
Solar
Solar energy systems are a permitted use in any zoning district. The ordinance also specifies
regulations for ground and roof mounted solar energy systems including placement, height, and
coverage.
Packet Page Number 4 of 259
October 24, 2011
City Council Meeting Minutes
4
Geothermal
• Geothermal ground source heat pump systems (closed loop only) are a permitted use in
any zoning district. The ordinance also specifies regulations for ground source heat pump
systems including placement and design.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
4. Approval of 2011 Budget Transfers
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the 2011 Budget Transfers.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
5. Approval of Resolution TH 36/English Street Interchange Improvement, City Project
09-08, Authorizing Additional Consulting Services and Adopting Project Budget
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Resolution TH 36/English Street Interchange
Improvement, City Project 09-08, Authorizing Additional Consulting Services and Adopting
Project Budget.
RESOLUTION 11-24-636
AUTHORIZING CONSULTING AND TESTING SERVICES AND
ADOPTING PRELIMINARY BUDGET
WHEREAS, the City has received $7,350,000 in Surface Transportation Program Funding
and has worked cooperatively with project partners including Ramsey County, Ramsey-
Washington Metro Watershed, and Mn/DOT in securing additional funding for the TH 36/English
Street Interchange Improvement, City Project 09-08.
AND WHEREAS, consulting services are needed for the next phase of the improvement
project, and SEH, Inc. and Kimley-Horn and Associates have provided previous work on this
project and have presented a work orders to continue project implementation;
AND WHEREAS, Braun Intertec provided the lowest responsive quote to perform drilling
and testing services for the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. The City’s pool consultants, SEH, Inc. and Kimley-Horn and Associates are the
designated firms for the next phase of project implementation and the City shall execute the
attached work orders estimated in an amount $233,500 and $148,880 respectively, in order to
begin said work plan.
2. Braun Intertec is the designated firm to perform drilling and testing services estimated in
an amount of $139,360 and the City shall execute a contract for said services.
2. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to
implement the preliminary financing plan for the project. A budget of $17,780,000 shall be
Packet Page Number 5 of 259
October 24, 2011
City Council Meeting Minutes
5
established. The proposed financing plan is as follows with the understanding that the approval
does not financially obligate project stakeholders until final agreements are made. In addition this
preliminary budget shows a funding gap of $2 million:
Total Cost
STP
Interchange
$
STP Water
Quality $ MNDOT SRC (1) Ramsey County
Cooperative
Agreement
(2) City RWMWD Total Sources
Total
Project
Cost $17,780,000 $7,350,000 $248,000 $4,500,000 $250,000 $708,000 $2,050,000 $732,000 $15,838,000
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of October 2011.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
6. Approval of Temporary Gambling Resolution and Fee Waiver – MMFL Media for
Shoua Yang Benefit
RESOLUTION 11-24-637
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the
temporary premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for MMFL Media (Minnesota Metro
Fastpitch League), to be used at the Dog House Bar and Grill, 2029 Woodlyn Avenue,
Maplewood, MN, on November 19, 2011 from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness
of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control
Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in
compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of
Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Temporary Gambling Resolution and Fee Waiver
– MMFL Media for Shoua Yang Benefit.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
H. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
Packet Page Number 6 of 259
October 24, 2011
City Council Meeting Minutes
6
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Trash Collection System Analysis – Update on Negotiations with Allied Waste
Services
Environmental Planner Finwall presented the staff report and answered questions of the council.
Mr. Yearling from Allied Waste Management addressed and answered questions of the council.
The following people spoke:
1. Willie Tennis, Tennis Sanitation
2. Mark Jenkins, Maplewood
2. Approval of Charitable Gambling Fund Proposed Awards
Assistant City Manager Ahl presented the staff report and answered questions of the council.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Charitable Gambling Fund Proposed Awards.
Organization Amount Requested Proposed Award
American Red Cross - TC Area Chapter $2,500 $600
Boy Scout Troop 461 $2,500 $1,250
Dispute Resolution Center $3,000 $1,300
District 622 ADD/ADHD Support Group $600 $300
District 622 Education Foundation $2,500 $1,085
Friends of Ramsey County Libraries $4,500 $1,690
Maple Tree Monastery Childcare Center $3,176 $385
Maplewood Area Historical Society $7,614 $4,483
Maplewood Mall - Simon Youth Foundation $500 $280
Maplewood Police Explorers $8,000 $4,950
Maplewood Police Reserves $5,000 $3,900
Maplewood Youth Scholarship Fund $3,000 $1,760
North St. Paul Area Food Shelf $1,000 $900
Ramsey County Fair $3,200 $2,100
Second Chance Animal Rescue $2,000 $650
Tubman Family Alliance $3,500 $1,800
Weaver Elementary PTA $500 $250
Fund Reserves $2,317
TOTAL $53,091 $30,000
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. 2012 Mill & Overlays, City Project 11-15, Resolution Accepting Feasibility Study and
Calling for Public Hearing
Deputy Public Works Director Thompson presented the staff report and answered questions of
the council.
Packet Page Number 7 of 259
October 24, 2011
City Council Meeting Minutes
7
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Resolution Accepting Feasibility Study and
Calling for Public Hearing for 2012 Mill & Overlays, City Project 11-15.
RESOLUTION 638
ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the council adopted June 27, 2011, a report has
been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of the 2012 Mill
and Overlays, City Project 11-15, and this report was received by the council on October 24,
2011, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost-effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the 2012 Mill and Overlays, City Project 11-15 in accordance with
the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the
improvement of $3,194,800.
2. The city engineer, or designated staff engineer, is the engineer for this improvement and is
hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement.
3. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary for the
preparation of plans and specifications. A proposed budget of $3,194,800 shall be established.
The proposed financing plan is as follows:
4. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 14th day of November,
2011 in the council chambers of city hall at 7:00 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and
published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Approved this 24th day of October 2011
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None.
FUNDING SOURCE
TOTAL
AMOUNT
% OF TOTAL
PROJECT
M.S.A. BONDS $1,266,400 40%
SANITARY SEWER FUND $59,900 2%
ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITY FUND $46,200 1%
SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT $1,146,000 36%
W.A.C. FUND $26,300 1%
3M TAX INCREMENT FINANCING $650,000 20%
TOTAL FUNDING $3,194,800 100%
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST RECOVERY
Packet Page Number 8 of 259
October 24, 2011
City Council Meeting Minutes
8
L. AWARD OF BIDS
None.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Cancellation of November 7, 2011 City Council – Manager Work Session
Councilmember Juenemann moved to cancel the November 7, 2011 City Council – Manager
Workshop Session.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
N. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Maplewood Monthly
Mayor Rossbach presented the Maplewood Monthly and informed residents that information on
the November 8, 2011 municipal election is on the front page.
2. Code Enforcement
Councilmember Juenemann requested information from staff relating to code enforcement and
homeowners setting things on the curb for sale or give it away for free.
3. Cable Commission
Councilmember Koppen requested to discuss at a future workshop what’s working and what’s not
working with the Cable Commission.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rossbach adjourned the meeting at 8:19 p.m.
Packet Page Number 9 of 259
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Packet Page Number 10 of 259
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2011\AprClms 10-21-11 and 10-28-11 and 11-4-11
AGENDA NO.G-1
TO:City Council
FROM:Finance Manager
RE:APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE:
1,039,480.77$ Checks # 85450 thru # 85498
dated 10/19/11thru 10/25/11
318,999.00$ Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 9/30/11 thru 10/20/11
984,420.19$ Checks # 85499 thru # 85559
dated 10/25/11 thru 11/1/11
195,213.49$ Disbursements via debits to checking account
10/21/11 thru 10/27/11
439,058.92$ Checks # 85560 thru # 85639
dated 11/2/11 thru 11/8/11
381,679.05$ Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 10/31/11 thru 11/4/11
3,358,851.42$ Total Accounts Payable
498,588.33$ Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 10/28/11
2,375.01$ Payroll Deduction check # 9985488 thru # 9985490
dated 10/28/11
500,963.34$ Total Payroll
3,859,814.76$ GRAND TOTAL
sb
attachments
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651-249-2902 if you have any questions on the
attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary.
PAYROLL
AGENDA REPORT
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills
and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
Packet Page Number 11 of 259
Check Description Amount
85450 04936 SPECIAL PAYROLL CHECK 10-14-2011 PAYR 257.89
85451 02396 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 102.30
85452 00585 NET BILLABLE TICKETS - SEPT 783.00
85453 04206 NOV LEGAL SERVICES 16,100.00
85454 00687 REMOVAL OF BRANCHES AND TREES 1,506.94
00687 REMOVAL OF BRANCHES AND TREES 213.75
00687 REMOVAL OF BRANCHES AND TREES 106.88
85455 04917 PARTIAL PAYMENT #3 PROJ 04-21 627,298.87
85456 00985 WASTEWATER - NOVEMBER 216,688.14
85457 04316 SEPT PAWN SYSTEM BILLING 550.80
85458 01337 SEPT 911 DISPATCH SVCS 24,088.75
01337 SEPT RADIO FLEET SUPPORT 654.08
85459 01337 2011 GENERAL ELECTION BALLOTS 1,398.26
85460 01546 SHIRTS FOR GYM PROGRAMS 252.50
85461 01574 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS NOT TO EXCEED 772.81
01574 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS NOT TO EXCEED 714.16
85462 01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 3,621.64
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 2,785.34
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 256.88
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 51.51
85463 01798 OCT UL GAS PURCHASE - CONTRACT 16,725.46
01798 OCT DIESEL PURCHASE - CONTRACT 8,801.39
85464 00064 SECURITY OFFICER FOR 10/15 EVENT 245.00
85465 04047 USHERS FOR SHOW 153.00
85466 04471 CONCERT SOUND FOR SHOW 10/14 1,300.00
85467 00159 REIMB FOR TRAINING EXPENSES 117.20
85468 03738 RETAINER FOR LEGAL SVCS & RENT 6,375.00
85469 04937 THEATER PERFORMANCE 10/15 REMEMBE 940.00
85470 00003 309 SUMMER PL - MASTERPIECE HMS 3,026.10
85471 00595 6-60' LIGHT STRUCTURES AND LIGHTING 49,670.65
85472 01971 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 37.74
85473 00809 REIMB FOR TRAINING EXPENSE 10.71
85474 04098 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 93.39
85475 00857 2011 REGIONAL MTG FEE - ROSSBACH 40.00
85476 00936 ANNUAL CITY CONTRIBUTION 2011 2,000.00
85477 00959 CONCERT PERFORMANCE 10/8/11 2,152.50
85478 01216 AQUATICS AREA DIAMOND BRITE AND PLA 23,633.00
85479 00001 REPR REIMB PROJ 10-14 T.DEVANEY 1,390.68
85480 00001 REPAIR REIMB PRJ10-14 - P.LYNCH 1,215.50
85481 00001 REFUND WEDDING REC. - A. MONSEN 350.00
85482 00001 REF TRANS MW033541-S.FRANZMEIER 291.00
85483 00001 REFUND TRANS MW03053 - H. WALSH 280.51
85484 00001 HP BENEFIT - T. NASSEFF 180.00
85485 00001 REPR REIMB PROJ 10-14 P.SCHNEIDER 90.00
85486 00001 MMBRSHIP CANCELLED - R.MONSON 70.70
85487 00001 JA-AUG HP BENEFIT - D. JONGEWAARD 60.00
85488 00001 AUG HP BENEFIT - M.KAUFENBERG 20.00
85489 00001 AUG BCBS BENEFIT - M. YANG 20.00
85490 00001 REFUND MNRR - J.BAKER 19.00
85491 04938 FACE PAINTING AT WOMENS EXPO 300.00
85492 01284 CITY NEWS - DECEMBER MAILING 4,500.00
85493 02008 STREET STRIPING NOT TO EXCEED $27,00 12,963.90
85494 02001 OCT JPA - NETWORKS SVCS 625.00
85495 04778 SOUND TECH - BANQUET RM EVENTS 300.0010/25/2011 DANIEL WILLIAM SCHLUETER
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 PHANCY FACE PAINTING PLUS
10/25/2011 POSTMASTER
10/25/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
10/25/2011 CITY OF ROSEVILLE
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
10/25/2011 MAPLEWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETY
10/25/2011 BILLY MCLAUGHLIN
10/25/2011 OLYMPIC POOLS INC
10/25/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
10/25/2011 ESCROW REFUND
10/25/2011 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
10/25/2011 MARY JACKSON
10/25/2011 TOMMY KONG
10/25/2011 NICHOLAS KREKELER
10/25/2011 ASHLAND PRODUCTIONS
10/25/2011 B&B AVM INC.
10/25/2011 PAUL BARTZ
10/25/2011 CHARLES E. BETHEL
10/25/2011 RICHARD DUNKIRK
10/25/2011 XCEL ENERGY
10/25/2011 XCEL ENERGY
10/25/2011 YOCUM OIL CO.
10/25/2011 YOCUM OIL CO.
10/25/2011 MARK ALDRIDGE
10/25/2011 SUBURBAN SPORTSWEAR
10/25/2011 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
10/25/2011 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
10/25/2011 XCEL ENERGY
10/25/2011 XCEL ENERGY
10/25/2011 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
10/25/2011 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS RECEIVABLES
10/25/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
10/25/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
10/25/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
Check Register
City of Maplewood
10/21/2011
Date Vendor
10/19/2011 BREANNA DANIELS
10/25/2011 SHANN FINWALL
10/25/2011 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL
10/25/2011 H.A. KANTRUD
10/25/2011 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC
10/25/2011 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC
10/25/2011 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC
10/25/2011 LUNDA CONSTRUCTION CO.
Packet Page Number 12 of 259
85496 01836 SEPT CRIME LAB SERVICES 215.00
85497 01634 REBUILT TRANNY FOR SQUAD 946 2,438.89
01634 CREDIT FOR RETURNED CORE -641.25
85498 01669 SEPT TOWING FEES 1,266.20
10/25/2011 CITY OF ST PAUL
10/25/2011 TOUSLEY FORD, INC.
10/25/2011 TOUSLEY FORD, INC.
10/25/2011 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT &
1,039,480.7749Checks in this report.
Packet Page Number 13 of 259
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee Description Amount
9/30/2011 10/17/2011 VANCO Billing fee 113.00
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 91,608.28
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 P.E.R.A.P.E.R.A.85,787.21
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 16,726.47
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 456.50
10/13/2011 10/18/2011 MidAmerica - ING HRA Flex plan 13,517.74
10/13/2011 10/18/2011 Labor Unions Union Dues 1,843.00
10/13/2011 10/18/2011 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 19,908.77
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 12,520.50
10/15/2011 10/19/2011 MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax 5,183.00
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 18,125.35
10/19/2011 10/20/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 23,773.09
10/13/2011 10/21/2011 Optum Health DCRP & Flex plan payments 2,233.42
10/15/2011 10/21/2011 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax 287.56
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 26,514.11
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 401.00
TOTAL 318,999.00
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Packet Page Number 14 of 259
Check Description Amount
85499 02464 FUNDS FOR ATMS 10,000.00
85500 00157 PROJ 10-14 PROF SRVS 8/13 - 9/09 3,348.12
85501 03809 RED CROSS BABYSITTING INSTRUCTION 120.00
85502 02728 PROJ 04-21 SRVS THRU 8/31 43,293.05
02728 PROJ 09-08 SRVS THRU 8/31 16,611.54
02728 PROJ 10-20 SRVS THRU 8/31 3,113.90
02728 PROJ 08-13 SRVS THRU 8/31 3,081.95
02728 PROJ 10-09 SRVS THRU 8/31 285.00
85503 03789 REIMB FOR MEALS 10/19 - 10/20 22.85
85504 01819 LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 9/15 - 10/14 1,551.45
01819 LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 8/15 - 9/14 1,503.18
85505 04943 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 9/21 - 9/23 161.03
85506 01409 PROJ 09-08 ENGINEERING FEES 36,293.98
01409 PROJ 04-21 ENGINEERING FEES 21,256.94
01409 PROJ 09-09 ENGINEERING FEES 6,336.08
01409 PROJ 11-19 ENGINEERING FEES 4,907.83
01409 ARCHITECT PLANNING SRVS PD SPACE 1,965.59
01409 ENGINEERING FEES 1,054.86
01409 PROJ 10-14 ENGINEERING FEES 474.24
01409 ARCHITECT PLANNING SRVS GLADSTONE 458.10
01409 WETLAND MITIGATION MONITORING 103.98
01409 ARCHITECT PLANNING SRVS PD SPACE -141.85
85507 01574 PROJ 10-14 WESTERN HILLS PARTPMT#7 736,024.67
85508 01190 ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 20,415.94
01190 ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 5,742.19
85509 04562 SENIOR FOOTCARE CLINICS 6/7 - 9/13 546.00
04562 SENIOR FOOTCARE CLINICS 4/12 - 5/10 196.00
85510 02074 REIMB FOR AIRFARE BAG 9/18 25.00
85511 00058 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10/13 32.19
85512 00111 PATROL HOURS 10/3 - 10/23 1,848.00
00111 BOARDING & DESTRUCTION FEES 1,640.88
85513 00116 CAR WASHES AUG & SEPT 269.20
85514 04942 PERFORMANCE MCC 10/08 400.00
85515 00211 PROJ 04-21 PROF SRVS THRU 10/7 4,417.25
85516 00230 BASE MATERIALS 115.62
85517 04549 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION SEPT 150.00
85518 04946 PD PROMOTIONAL BADGE STICKERS 320.95
85519 04806 ESCROW REL 1670 LEGACY PKWY 22,818.56
85520 00003 ESCROW REL SHEPHERDS 2730 BRAND 2,500.00
85521 01401 BUS FEE FIELD TRIP-AAMODTS APPLE 192.00
85522 04123 CHARITABLE GAMBLING 2011 1,856.89
85523 04064 REIMB FOR MEALS 9/18 - 9/22 68.03
04064 REIMB FOR MEALS 10/19 - 10/20 20.91
85524 04945 CHARITABLE GAMBLING 2011 900.00
85525 04944 SNACK BAR - SEPT 577.26
85526 04152 JOHN GLENN POOL RENTAL 9/6-10/6 1,190.00
85527 04939 DAY TRIP COORD. FEE 155.00
04939 DAY TRIP COORD. FEE 40.00
85528 00857 REGIONAL MEETING 11/17 J ANTONEN 40.00
85529 04353 ESCROW REL 2620 KNOLLWOOD CT N 2,503.29
85530 01043 MEMBERSHIP DUES 35.00
85531 00936 CHARITABLE GAMBLING 2011 4,000.00
85532 00983 LEASE PMT 10/15 - 11/15 1,137.15
Check Register
City of Maplewood
10/31/2011
Date Vendor
10/25/2011 US BANK
11/01/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
11/01/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
11/01/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
11/01/2011 BARR ENGINEERING CO
11/01/2011 CASIE JACKSON
11/01/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
11/01/2011 PAETEC
11/01/2011 JOE RUEB
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
11/01/2011 MICHAEL NYE
11/01/2011 PAETEC
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
11/01/2011 XCEL ENERGY
11/01/2011 XCEL ENERGY
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 S.E.H.
11/01/2011 CRAIG AICHELE
11/01/2011 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
11/01/2011 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
11/01/2011 AFFORDABLE FOOT CARE
11/01/2011 AFFORDABLE FOOT CARE
11/01/2011 CHARLES R AHL
11/01/2011 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.
11/01/2011 JAN ALICE CAMPBELL
11/01/2011 CREATIVE SRVS OF NEW ENGLAND
11/01/2011 APPEARANCE PLUS CAR WASH CORP
11/01/2011 BOB & THE BEACHCOMBERS
11/01/2011 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP.
11/01/2011 FRIENDS OF MAPLEWOOD NATURE
11/01/2011 DEREK FRITZE
11/01/2011 DEREK FRITZE
11/01/2011 ECUMEN
11/01/2011 ESCROW REFUND
11/01/2011 FIRST STUDENT INC
11/01/2011 KATHLEEN KIRCHOFF
11/01/2011 KATHLEEN KIRCHOFF
11/01/2011 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
11/01/2011 FUSION DRUMLINE
11/01/2011 HILLCREST VENTURES LLC
11/01/2011 ISD 622 COMMUNITY EDUCATION
11/01/2011 METRO SALES INC
11/01/2011 LEE HOMES, LLC
11/01/2011 M E H A
11/01/2011 MAPLEWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETY
Packet Page Number 15 of 259
85533 04193 FORFEITED VEHICLE STORAGE - OCT 2,250.00
85534 01136 PD FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION 240.00
85535 01175 MONTHLY UTILITIES 3,085.69
01175 FIBER OPTIC ACCESS CHG - OCT 1,000.00
85536 00001 REIMB R BERAN DRIVEWAY APRON 1,234.57
85537 00001 REIMB W GOERTZEN DRIVEWAY APRON 651.70
85538 00001 REIMB K KALLESTAD DRIVEWAY APRON 547.20
85539 00001 REIMB LILY RAY MUSIC CONCERT EXP 274.30
85540 00001 REIMB MERRIGANS BLDG SRVS MAILBOX 225.00
85541 00001 REFUND S ZAHRADKA MEMBERSHIP 112.47
85542 00001 REFUND COSTCO OVERCHG FOR EVENT 50.00
85543 00001 REFUND P NYAKEOGA SWIM CLASS 45.32
85544 00001 REFUND J BAKER PD TWICE MNRR/TAX 19.00
85545 04276 INSTRUCTION FEE 10/6 - 11/17 576.00
04276 INSTRUCTION FEE 3/24 - 4/28 336.00
85546 04829 REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS 8/22-10/10 1,165.28
85547 04941 SOUND CONTRACTING MCC JULY 16 70.00
85548 04779 FALL 2011 CLEAN UP EVENT 915.00
85549 00396 TRANSFER TITLES FORFEITED VEHICLES 107.50
85550 04940 KEYS FOR IMPOUNED VEHICLES 160.00
85551 01387 ADMIN FEE FOR STRESS TEST - OCT 100.00
85552 01418 CARVER GYM SUPPLIES 109.40
85553 01836 PRINTING SRVS 1,476.53
01836 LOCATE SERVICES 51.80
85554 04048 TRENCHED FOR OAK WILT CONTROL 352.69
85555 00198 WATER UTILITY 828.74
85556 04528 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION - AUG 114.00
04528 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION - SEPT 85.00
85557 04131 LINE DANCE INSTRUCTION - OCT 180.00
85558 03685 CHARITABLE GAMBLING 2011 1,900.00
85559 01707 DARE PLAQUES 177.20
11/01/2011 MIDAMERICA AUCTIONS
11/01/2011 NARDINI FIRE EQUIP CO INC
11/01/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/01/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/01/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/01/2011 CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL
11/01/2011 CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL
11/01/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/01/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/01/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/01/2011 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC
11/01/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/01/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/01/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/01/2011 PPL INDUSTRIES, INC.
11/01/2011 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
11/01/2011 QUALITY LOCKSMITH SERVICES INC
11/01/2011 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC
11/01/2011 CHRISTIE PENN
11/01/2011 JOHN PICKARD
11/01/2011 CITY OF ST PAUL
11/01/2011 ST. CROIX TREE SERVICE
11/01/2011 ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS
11/01/2011 DR. JAMES ROSSINI
11/01/2011 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
11/01/2011 CITY OF ST PAUL
11/01/2011 TUBMAN
11/01/2011 VALLEY TROPHY
984,420.1961Checks in this report.
11/01/2011 SARA M. R. THOMPSON
11/01/2011 SARA M. R. THOMPSON
11/01/2011 TROPICAL BALLROOM
Packet Page Number 16 of 259
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee Description Amount
10/21/2011 10/24/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 15,761.11
10/24/2011 10/25/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 21,903.44
10/21/2011 10/26/2011 US Bank VISA One Card*Purchasing card items 586.13
10/21/2011 10/26/2011 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax license 25.00
10/25/2011 10/26/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 20,692.13
10/26/2011 10/27/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 17,161.65
10/26/2011 10/27/2011 ING - State Plan Deferred Compensation 28,055.40
9/30/2011 10/28/2011 US Bank Bank fees 89.86
10/21/2011 10/28/2011 US Bank VISA One Card*Purchasing card items 52,767.47
10/26/2011 10/28/2011 ICMA (Vantagepointe)Deferred Compensation 4,312.76
10/27/2011 10/28/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 33,476.04
10/27/2011 10/28/2011 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 382.50
TOTAL 195,213.49
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Packet Page Number 17 of 259
Transaction Date Posting Date Merchant Name Transaction Amount Name
10/19/2011 10/20/2011 JOES SPORTING GOODS $21.41 PAUL BARTZ
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $62.24 BRIAN BIERDEMAN
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 OPTICS PLANET INC $79.78 JOSEPH DEMULLING
10/12/2011 10/12/2011 APL*APPLE ONLINE STORE $213.18 TIMOTHY HAWKINSON JR.
10/19/2011 10/20/2011 LA POLICE GEAR INC $54.07 PHENG HER
10/10/2011 10/13/2011 FIST INC.$55.70 JASON MARINO
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 PAKOR INC $258.23 SHELLY NEPHEW
10/13/2011 10/18/2011 PAKOR INC ($258.23)SHELLY NEPHEW
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 JCPENNEY STORE 0496 $25.98 PAUL THEISEN
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 GANDER MOUNTAIN $16.06 JAY WENZEL
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 TOMS TAILORS $9.64 JAY WENZEL
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $48.07 KAO XIONG
$586.13
Packet Page Number 18 of 259
Transaction Date Posting Date Merchant Name Transaction Amount Name
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 U OF M CCE NONCREDIT $235.00 R CHARLES AHL
10/05/2011 10/10/2011 OLD LOG THEATER, LTD $322.50 MANDY ANZALDI
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 LAKESHORE PLAYERS INC $144.00 MANDY ANZALDI
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 LAKESHORE PLAYERS INC $102.00 MANDY ANZALDI
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 AQUA LOGICS INC $66.82 JIM BEHAN
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 AQUA LOGICS INC $1,148.91 JIM BEHAN
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 AQUA LOGICS INC $465.33 JIM BEHAN
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 NUCO2 01 OF 01 $70.24 JIM BEHAN
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 NUCO2 01 OF 01 $133.93 JIM BEHAN
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 NUCO2 01 OF 01 $47.81 JIM BEHAN
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 NUCO2 01 OF 01 $56.63 JIM BEHAN
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 AQUA LOGICS INC $50.73 JIM BEHAN
10/09/2011 10/10/2011 APL*APPLE ITUNES STORE $4.27 CHAD BERGO
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 EDUCATIONAL INNOVATIONS I $21.85 OAKLEY BIESANZ
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 USPS 26833895523402076 $15.84 OAKLEY BIESANZ
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 SUPERAMERICA 4089 $9.38 NEIL BRENEMAN
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 FLAGHOUSE INC $40.66 NEIL BRENEMAN
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $8.53 TROY BRINK
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $2.89 TROY BRINK
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$6.28 SARAH BURLINGAME
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 NOODLES CO 313 $124.85 SARAH BURLINGAME
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTI $55.24 SARAH BURLINGAME
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 SHRED IT $10.00 SARAH BURLINGAME
10/15/2011 10/17/2011 CURTIS 1000 INC.$50.36 SARAH BURLINGAME
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $56.04 SARAH BURLINGAME
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $77.26 SARAH BURLINGAME
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 CURTIS 1000 INC.$1,389.14 SARAH BURLINGAME
10/11/2011 10/13/2011 CBS MINNEAPOLIS $1,200.00 HEIDI CAREY
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 KARE $500.00 HEIDI CAREY
10/19/2011 10/20/2011 WEDDINGPAGES INC $128.00 HEIDI CAREY
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISING $2,000.00 HEIDI CAREY
10/09/2011 10/11/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $58.49 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 VIKING ELECTRIC - CREDIT $92.66 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 VIKING ELECTRIC - CREDIT $470.25 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 VIKING ELECTRIC - CREDIT $1,524.04 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 PAYPAL *OPTICPLANET $199.50 KERRY CROTTY
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 G&K SERVICES 182 $78.20 CHARLES DEAVER
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 MENARDS 3022 $49.23 CHARLES DEAVER
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 MENARDS 3022 $6.42 CHARLES DEAVER
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $133.57 DOUG EDGE
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $9.61 DAVE EDSON
10/19/2011 10/20/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $12.30 DAVE EDSON
10/11/2011 10/13/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $4.25 PAUL E EVERSON
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 G&K SERVICES 182 $372.36 LARRY FARR
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 G&K SERVICES 182 $678.75 LARRY FARR
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $109.07 LARRY FARR
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 NEEDELS SUPPLY INC.$65.88 LARRY FARR
10/08/2011 10/10/2011 TARGET 00024067 $32.13 LARRY FARR
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC $269.44 LARRY FARR
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 VIKING ELECTRIC - CREDIT $3,905.21 LARRY FARR
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 JCPENNEY STORE 2865 $15.00 LARRY FARR
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 WM EZPAY $945.76 LARRY FARR
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 WM EZPAY $428.50 LARRY FARR
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 WM EZPAY $450.38 LARRY FARR
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 WM EZPAY $498.53 LARRY FARR
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 KEEFE CO PARKING $6.50 DAVID FISHER
10/06/2011 10/10/2011 BARNES & NOBLE #2227 $64.26 MYCHAL FOWLDS
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 SPECIALIZED TRANSPORTATIO $482.49 MYCHAL FOWLDS
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 CENTURYLINK*TN651 $75.95 MYCHAL FOWLDS
10/11/2011 10/13/2011 PAY FLOW PRO $59.95 MYCHAL FOWLDS
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 BATTERIES PLUS #31 $111.37 MYCHAL FOWLDS
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 CUSTOMER SUPT CENTER $898.82 MYCHAL FOWLDS
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 CABLING SERVICES $2,656.30 MYCHAL FOWLDS
10/06/2011 10/10/2011 MICROCOM TECHNOLOGIES,$397.68 NICK FRANZEN
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 IDENTISYS INC $2,969.71 NICK FRANZEN
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $21.38 NICK FRANZEN
10/16/2011 10/17/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $47.85 NICK FRANZEN
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT $369.58 NICK FRANZEN
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 HP DIRECT-PUBLICSECTOR $221.75 NICK FRANZEN
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 MENARDS 3059 $9.08 CLARENCE GERVAIS
10/06/2011 10/10/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $26.35 JEAN GLASS
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 FIRST SHRED $13.00 JEAN GLASS
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 WALGREENS #3122 $3.95 JAN GREW HAYMAN
Packet Page Number 19 of 259
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 VERIZON WRLS MYACCT VN $103.65 KAREN GUILFOILE
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $17.28 MARK HAAG
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 WW GRAINGER $209.23 MARK HAAG
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $1.77 MARK HAAG
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 WW GRAINGER $489.60 MARK HAAG
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $66.93 MILES HAMRE
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 MENARDS 3022 $86.06 GARY HINNENKAMP
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 MENARDS 3022 $15.42 GARY HINNENKAMP
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$17.08 RON HORWATH
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$5.98 RON HORWATH
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $17.11 RON HORWATH
10/08/2011 10/10/2011 HEJNY RENTAL INC $189.28 RON HORWATH
10/09/2011 10/10/2011 HEJNY RENTAL INC ($9.08)RON HORWATH
10/12/2011 10/14/2011 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $500.70 DAVID JAHN
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$11.37 TOM KALKA
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTI $546.00 DUWAYNE KONEWKO
10/18/2011 10/20/2011 OFFICE MAX $25.15 NICHOLAS KREKELER
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 SHRED IT $49.00 DAVID KVAM
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 THE GRAFIX SHOPPE $358.03 DAVID KVAM
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 COMCAST CABLE COMM $34.00 DAVID KVAM
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 ULTRA MAX $417.00 DAVID KVAM
10/18/2011 10/18/2011 COMCAST CABLE COMM $59.95 DAVID KVAM
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 U OF M CCE NONCREDIT $235.00 STEVE LOVE
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$77.10 STEVE LUKIN
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$591.10 STEVE LUKIN
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$44.95 STEVE LUKIN
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$44.95 STEVE LUKIN
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$89.90 STEVE LUKIN
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$199.85 STEVE LUKIN
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$4.29 STEVE LUKIN
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 OVERHEAD DOOR COMP $276.95 STEVE LUKIN
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 OVERHEAD DOOR COMP $1,479.00 STEVE LUKIN
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 OVERHEAD DOOR COMP $214.45 STEVE LUKIN
10/12/2011 10/14/2011 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL $183.15 STEVE LUKIN
10/12/2011 10/14/2011 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL $190.02 STEVE LUKIN
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 METRO FIRE $170.00 STEVE LUKIN
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE $20.00 STEVE LUKIN
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 ROSEMOUNT BP $23.28 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 ROSEMOUNT BP $63.13 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 G&K SERVICES 182 $270.75 MARK MARUSKA
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 HANDY HITCH WELDING CO IN $57.69 MARK MARUSKA
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 AMERICAN FASTENER AND SUP $37.49 MARK MARUSKA
10/11/2011 10/13/2011 HANDY HITCH WELDING CO IN $14.94 MARK MARUSKA
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION $1,488.81 MARK MARUSKA
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $39.60 MARK MARUSKA
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 FRA DOR BLACK DIRT & REC $20.00 MARK MARUSKA
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $597.00 MICHAEL MONDOR
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $13.20 MICHAEL MONDOR
10/15/2011 10/17/2011 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSO $40.00 MICHAEL MONDOR
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMENT $22.43 MICHAEL MONDOR
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $840.15 MICHAEL MONDOR
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 BEST BUY MHT 00000109 $796.64 MICHAEL MONDOR
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $215.21 JOHN NAUGHTON
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 MENARDS 3059 $31.72 JOHN NAUGHTON
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $19.27 JOHN NAUGHTON
10/06/2011 10/10/2011 PAPER PLUS-ROS00108803 $289.24 SHELLY NEPHEW
10/11/2011 10/14/2011 OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER $218.54 ERICK OSWALD
10/12/2011 10/14/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 ($12.79)MARY KAY PALANK
10/12/2011 10/14/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 ($21.63)MARY KAY PALANK
10/12/2011 10/14/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $100.27 MARY KAY PALANK
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $8.50 MARY KAY PALANK
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $51.91 MARY KAY PALANK
10/18/2011 10/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $174.22 MARY KAY PALANK
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $69.10 MARY KAY PALANK
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 SUBWAY 00052159 $10.03 CHRISTINE PENN
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 DOLRTREE 3150 00031500 $35.35 CHRISTINE PENN
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $55.62 CHRISTINE PENN
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $85.61 CHRISTINE PENN
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $40.64 CHRISTINE PENN
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 DOLLARTREE.COM $205.68 CHRISTINE PENN
10/08/2011 10/10/2011 DAIRY QUEEN #11235 $25.70 CHRISTINE PENN
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$39.07 CHRISTINE PENN
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 BROADWAY RENTAL $710.70 CHRISTINE PENN
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 TARGET 00009316 $46.04 CHRISTINE PENN
Packet Page Number 20 of 259
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 MICHAELS #4747 $26.77 CHRISTINE PENN
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 MICHAELS #4747 $53.54 CHRISTINE PENN
10/09/2011 10/10/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $505.79 PHILIP F POWELL
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 RADIOSHACK COR00199133 $42.83 PHILIP F POWELL
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 DYNAMICDESIGPAYPALL $55.69 PHILIP F POWELL
10/16/2011 10/17/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $72.45 PHILIP F POWELL
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 METRO FIRE $89.66 PHILIP F POWELL
10/15/2011 10/17/2011 LITTLE CAESARS 1456 0006 $70.70 WILLIAM PRIEFER
10/06/2011 10/10/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $22.70 STEVEN PRIEM
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 POMPS TIRE SERVICE, INC $931.34 STEVEN PRIEM
10/10/2011 10/11/2011 BOYER TRUCK PARTS $430.70 STEVEN PRIEM
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $52.39 STEVEN PRIEM
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 FACTORY MTR PTS #1 $72.91 STEVEN PRIEM
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 FACTORY MTR PTS #1 $299.20 STEVEN PRIEM
10/11/2011 10/12/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $310.97 STEVEN PRIEM
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 FACTORY MTR PTS #1 $432.85 STEVEN PRIEM
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $310.97 STEVEN PRIEM
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $18.47 STEVEN PRIEM
10/12/2011 10/13/2011 AMERICAN FASTENER AND SUP $295.37 STEVEN PRIEM
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 BAUER BUILT TIRE 18 $846.63 STEVEN PRIEM
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $265.39 STEVEN PRIEM
10/13/2011 10/17/2011 WHEELCO BRAKE &SUPPLY $64.99 STEVEN PRIEM
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 ($37.49)STEVEN PRIEM
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $110.26 STEVEN PRIEM
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $8.87 STEVEN PRIEM
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $238.51 STEVEN PRIEM
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 POLAR CHEVROLET MAZDA PAR $194.52 STEVEN PRIEM
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 POLAR CHEVROLET MAZDA PAR $185.29 STEVEN PRIEM
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $56.53 STEVEN PRIEM
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 POMPS TIRE SERVICE, INC $1,502.92 STEVEN PRIEM
10/18/2011 10/19/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $111.95 STEVEN PRIEM
10/18/2011 10/20/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $100.00 STEVEN PRIEM
10/19/2011 10/20/2011 FACTORY MTR PTS #1 $80.15 STEVEN PRIEM
10/19/2011 10/20/2011 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $231.73 STEVEN PRIEM
10/19/2011 10/20/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $4.87 STEVEN PRIEM
10/19/2011 10/20/2011 GOODYEAR AUTO SRV CT 6920 $47.00 STEVEN PRIEM
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $70.76 STEVEN PRIEM
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 GOODYEAR AUTO SRV CT 6920 $47.00 STEVEN PRIEM
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HE $149.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX
10/17/2011 10/18/2011 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS $1,160.74 MICHAEL REILLY
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 FITNESS WHOLESALE $190.65 LORI RESENDIZ
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 FITNESS WHOLESALE $27.26 LORI RESENDIZ
10/08/2011 10/10/2011 TARGET 00011858 $49.16 AUDRA ROBBINS
10/09/2011 10/10/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$17.95 AUDRA ROBBINS
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 TARGET 00011858 $26.30 AUDRA ROBBINS
10/17/2011 10/19/2011 ORIENTAL TRADING CO $51.91 AUDRA ROBBINS
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 AAMODTS APPLE FARM INC $113.30 AUDRA ROBBINS
10/10/2011 10/12/2011 ADVANCE SHORING COMPANY $139.16 ROBERT RUNNING
10/11/2011 10/13/2011 METRO FIRE $250.16 ROBERT RUNNING
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $127.30 DEB SCHMIDT
10/06/2011 10/10/2011 APPLEBEES 825219219658 $48.54 MICHAEL SHORTREED
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $27.75 MICHAEL SHORTREED
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 BIG STEER MEATS $11.06 CHRISTINE SOUTTER
10/20/2011 10/21/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$10.57 JOANNE SVENDSEN
10/11/2011 10/13/2011 STRAUSS SKATE AND BICY $743.00 JAMES TAYLOR
10/12/2011 10/14/2011 OFFICE MAX $8.81 JAMES TAYLOR
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 TARGET 00011858 $48.11 JAMES TAYLOR
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 INDYGO $7.00 DAVID THOMALLA
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE $35.95 KAREN WACHAL
10/14/2011 10/17/2011 FRESH WATER SOCIETY $20.95 KAREN WACHAL
10/07/2011 10/10/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $70.24 SUSAN ZWIEG
10/13/2011 10/14/2011 PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTI $62.10 SUSAN ZWIEG
$52,767.47
Packet Page Number 21 of 259
CHECK #CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
AMOUNT
10/28/11 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 416.42
10/28/11 STRAUTMANIS, MARIS 242.00
10/28/11 VALLE, EDWARD 100.00
10/28/11 NEPHEW, JOHN 416.42
10/28/11 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 473.15
10/28/11 KOPPEN, MARVIN 416.42
10/28/11 LLANAS, JAMES 416.42
10/28/11 CHRISTENSON, SCOTT 2,231.33
10/28/11 FARR, LARRY 3,030.67
10/28/11 BURLINGAME, SARAH 1,966.90
10/28/11 KANTRUD, HUGH 184.62
10/28/11 AHL, R. CHARLES 4,958.72
10/28/11 ANTONEN, JAMES 5,300.00
10/28/11 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,173.29
10/28/11 DEBILZAN, JUDY 1,270.59
10/28/11 BAUMAN, GAYLE 4,014.97
10/28/11 URBANSKI, HOLLY 1,105.00
10/28/11 JAHN, DAVID 1,840.37
10/28/11 RAMEAUX, THERESE 3,030.67
10/28/11 CAREY, HEIDI 2,005.19
10/28/11 GUILFOILE, KAREN 4,176.43
10/28/11 RUEB, JOSEPH 2,493.80
10/28/11 ARNOLD, AJLA 1,535.69
10/28/11 JACKSON, MARY 2,147.28
10/28/11 KELSEY, CONNIE 2,569.24
10/28/11 LARSON, MICHELLE 1,758.15
10/28/11 MECHELKE, SHERRIE 945.69
10/28/11 THOMFORDE, FAITH 828.00
10/28/11 CORTESI, LUANNE 1,098.39
10/28/11 NEPHEW, MICHELLE 1,630.15
10/28/11 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 2,719.20
10/28/11 WEAVER, KRISTINE 2,288.56
10/28/11 CARLE, JEANETTE 72.00
10/28/11 RICHTER, CHARLENE 932.49
10/28/11 SCHOENECKER, LEIGH 1,554.15
10/28/11 MOY, PAMELA 1,496.49
10/28/11 OSTER, ANDREA 1,886.77
10/28/11 POWELL, PHILIP 2,903.66
10/28/11 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 2,081.80
10/28/11 KVAM, DAVID 4,188.29
10/28/11 PALANK, MARY 1,895.77
10/28/11 JAGOE, CAROL 120.00
10/28/11 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,887.15
10/28/11 BAKKE, LONN 3,034.91
10/28/11 BARTZ, PAUL 4,291.04
10/28/11 ABEL, CLINT 2,947.82
10/28/11 ALDRIDGE, MARK 3,145.02
10/28/11 THOMALLA, DAVID 4,936.26
10/28/11 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,887.15
10/28/11 BUSACK, DANIEL 3,427.39
10/28/11 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 3,563.56
10/28/11 BOHL, JOHN 3,400.15
10/28/11 BELDE, STANLEY 3,008.71
10/28/11 BENJAMIN, MARKESE 2,785.00
Packet Page Number 22 of 259
10/28/11 COFFEY, KEVIN 3,472.22
10/28/11 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2,847.25
10/28/11 FLOR, TIMOTHY 3,574.41
10/28/11 DOBLAR, RICHARD 3,886.81
10/28/11 DUGAS, MICHAEL 3,480.81
10/28/11 CROTTY, KERRY 3,575.20
10/28/11 DEMULLING, JOSEPH 3,003.45
10/28/11 HAWKINSON JR, TIMOTHY 2,785.00
10/28/11 HER, PHENG 2,712.40
10/28/11 FRITZE, DEREK 2,785.00
10/28/11 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 3,247.24
10/28/11 FORSYTHE, MARCUS 1,921.29
10/28/11 FRASER, JOHN 3,399.44
10/28/11 KREKELER, NICHOLAS 842.40
10/28/11 KROLL, BRETT 3,131.36
10/28/11 KALKA, THOMAS 913.08
10/28/11 KONG, TOMMY 2,921.60
10/28/11 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2,954.18
10/28/11 JOHNSON, KEVIN 5,284.10
10/28/11 MARINO, JASON 2,842.94
10/28/11 MARTIN, JERROLD 3,031.75
10/28/11 LU, JOHNNIE 2,869.16
10/28/11 LYNCH, KATHERINE 2,159.33
10/28/11 LANGNER, SCOTT 2,842.94
10/28/11 LANGNER, TODD 2,943.49
10/28/11 PARKER, JAMES 2,218.78
10/28/11 REZNY, BRADLEY 3,469.76
10/28/11 NYE, MICHAEL 3,471.76
10/28/11 OLSON, JULIE 2,927.84
10/28/11 MCCARTY, GLEN 3,222.13
10/28/11 METRY, ALESIA 3,001.43
10/28/11 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 3,158.83
10/28/11 TAUZELL, BRIAN 2,423.48
10/28/11 STEINER, JOSEPH 2,785.00
10/28/11 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 2,785.00
10/28/11 RHUDE, MATTHEW 2,785.00
10/28/11 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 4,060.51
10/28/11 XIONG, KAO 2,842.94
10/28/11 ANDERSON, BRIAN 372.00
10/28/11 TRAN, JOSEPH 3,739.83
10/28/11 WENZEL, JAY 3,048.47
10/28/11 THEISEN, PAUL 3,333.89
10/28/11 THIENES, PAUL 3,963.77
10/28/11 BOURQUIN, RON 576.00
10/28/11 BRADBURY, RYAN 144.00
10/28/11 BAUMAN, ANDREW 2,684.65
10/28/11 BIGELBACH, ANTHONY 336.00
10/28/11 BAHL, DAVID 406.00
10/28/11 BASSETT, BRENT 288.00
10/28/11 CRUMMY, CHARLES 138.00
10/28/11 DAWSON, RICHARD 2,855.68
10/28/11 CAPISTRANT, JOHN 794.50
10/28/11 CRAWFORD, RAYMOND 138.00
10/28/11 BRESIN, ROBERT 42.00
10/28/11 CAPISTRANT, JACOB 813.00
10/28/11 HALE, JOSEPH 336.00
10/28/11 HALWEG, JODI 2,682.93
10/28/11 FOSSUM, ANDREW 2,575.55
10/28/11 HAGEN, MICHAEL 516.00
10/28/11 EATON, PAUL 144.00
10/28/11 EVERSON, PAUL 1,487.01
10/28/11 HERLUND, RICK 288.00
10/28/11 HAWTHORNE, ROCHELLE 144.00
10/28/11 HENDRICKSON, NICHOLAS 2,236.38
Packet Page Number 23 of 259
10/28/11 IMM, TRACY 282.00
10/28/11 JANSEN, CHAD 432.00
10/28/11 HUTCHINSON, JAMES 329.00
10/28/11 KONDER, RONALD 288.00
10/28/11 KUBAT, ERIC 2,351.20
10/28/11 KARRAS, JAMIE 336.00
10/28/11 KERSKA, JOSEPH 576.00
10/28/11 JOHNSON, JAMES 539.50
10/28/11 KANE, ROBERT 553.00
10/28/11 MILLER, LADD 159.00
10/28/11 MILLER, NICHOLAS 216.00
10/28/11 MELLEN, CHRISTOPHER 108.00
10/28/11 MELLEN, RICHARD 180.00
10/28/11 LINDER, TIMOTHY 2,537.50
10/28/11 LOCHEN, MICHAEL 388.00
10/28/11 NOVAK, JEROME 2,752.03
10/28/11 NOWICKI, PAUL 282.00
10/28/11 MORGAN, JEFFERY 97.50
10/28/11 NIELSEN, KENNETH 144.00
10/28/11 MONDOR, MICHAEL 3,089.18
10/28/11 MONSON, PETER 375.00
10/28/11 PETERSON, ROBERT 2,916.62
10/28/11 PLACE, ANDREA 2,670.82
10/28/11 PACHECO, ALPHONSE 354.00
10/28/11 PETERSON, MARK 588.00
10/28/11 OLSON, JAMES 2,642.69
10/28/11 OPHEIM, JOHN 252.00
10/28/11 RAVENWALD, CORINNE 288.00
10/28/11 REYNOSO, ANGEL 330.00
10/28/11 RANK, NATHAN 864.00
10/28/11 RANK, PAUL 900.00
10/28/11 POWERS, KENNETH 336.00
10/28/11 RAINEY, JAMES 576.00
10/28/11 SVENDSEN, RONALD 2,855.97
10/28/11 WESSELS, TIMOTHY 768.00
10/28/11 SEDLACEK, JEFFREY 2,864.32
10/28/11 STREFF, MICHAEL 2,642.69
10/28/11 RICE, CHRISTOPHER 1,071.00
10/28/11 RODRIGUEZ, ROBERTO 354.00
10/28/11 KNUTSON, LOIS 2,034.95
10/28/11 NIVEN, AMY 1,411.62
10/28/11 LUKIN, STEVEN 4,475.33
10/28/11 ZWIEG, SUSAN 2,236.46
10/28/11 WHITE, JOEL 144.00
10/28/11 GERVAIS-JR, CLARENCE 3,867.86
10/28/11 EDGE, DOUGLAS 2,348.14
10/28/11 HAMRE, MILES 837.00
10/28/11 BUCKLEY, BRENT 1,986.95
10/28/11 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 739.21
10/28/11 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 3,050.13
10/28/11 BRINK, TROY 2,582.90
10/28/11 RUNNING, ROBERT 2,333.35
10/28/11 TEVLIN, TODD 2,175.35
10/28/11 NAGEL, BRYAN 3,408.40
10/28/11 OSWALD, ERICK 2,441.93
10/28/11 JONES, DONALD 2,145.35
10/28/11 MEISSNER, BRENT 1,950.15
10/28/11 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 2,839.97
10/28/11 KREGER, JASON 2,444.22
10/28/11 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 2,530.95
10/28/11 JACOBSON, SCOTT 2,624.60
10/28/11 BURLINGAME, NATHAN 2,006.40
10/28/11 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,713.97
10/28/11 KUMMER, STEVEN 3,181.49
Packet Page Number 24 of 259
10/28/11 ZIEMAN, SCOTT 237.85
10/28/11 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 4,390.46
10/28/11 LOVE, STEVEN 3,281.19
10/28/11 THOMPSON, MICHAEL 4,028.28
10/28/11 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,713.98
10/28/11 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 2,127.66
10/28/11 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1,520.04
10/28/11 MARUSKA, MARK 3,183.11
10/28/11 NAUGHTON, JOHN 2,125.35
10/28/11 EDSON, DAVID 2,170.59
10/28/11 HINNENKAMP, GARY 2,138.46
10/28/11 SOUTTER, CHRISTINE 224.44
10/28/11 WACHAL, KAREN 911.18
10/28/11 HAYMAN, JANET 1,184.10
10/28/11 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,622.79
10/28/11 DEAVER, CHARLES 497.96
10/28/11 GERNES, CAROLE 94.50
10/28/11 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 3,800.52
10/28/11 FINWALL, SHANN 3,202.17
10/28/11 SINDT, ANDREA 2,013.80
10/28/11 THOMPSON, DEBRA 752.86
10/28/11 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 3,211.95
10/28/11 KROLL, LISA 1,882.15
10/28/11 SWAN, DAVID 2,738.95
10/28/11 WELLENS, MOLLY 1,595.37
10/28/11 CARVER, NICHOLAS 3,211.95
10/28/11 FISHER, DAVID 3,778.99
10/28/11 MARTIN, MICHAEL 2,682.95
10/28/11 BRASH, JASON 2,259.75
10/28/11 CONNOLLY, COURTNEY 156.00
10/28/11 FRANK, PETER 250.00
10/28/11 BETHEL III, CHARLES 25.50
10/28/11 BJORK, BRANDON 511.50
10/28/11 ALLEN, KATELYN 192.50
10/28/11 BERGER, STEPHANIE 517.75
10/28/11 ROBBINS, AUDRA 2,847.74
10/28/11 ROBBINS, CAMDEN 122.00
10/28/11 LUBKE, COLLEEN 180.00
10/28/11 MILTON, SCOTT 118.75
10/28/11 GERMAIN, BRADY 148.00
10/28/11 JANASZAK, MEGHAN 465.13
10/28/11 GERMAIN, DAVID 2,134.60
10/28/11 HAAG, MARK 2,575.97
10/28/11 TAYLOR, JAMES 2,711.78
10/28/11 ADAMS, DAVID 1,819.41
10/28/11 SCHALLER, SCOTT 129.00
10/28/11 SCHALLER, TYLER 148.63
10/28/11 EVANS, CHRISTINE 1,354.81
10/28/11 GLASS, JEAN 2,103.68
10/28/11 BRENEMAN, NEIL 1,603.72
10/28/11 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 374.15
10/28/11 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 3,060.34
10/28/11 ANZALDI, MANDY 1,262.22
10/28/11 OLSON, SANDRA 168.00
10/28/11 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 645.96
10/28/11 HOFMEISTER, TIMOTHY 482.00
10/28/11 KULHANEK-DIONNE, ANN 397.26
10/28/11 HER, PETER 398.80
10/28/11 HOFMEISTER, MARY 1,161.03
10/28/11 ZIELINSKI, JUDY 15.40
10/28/11 VANG, KAY 152.63
10/28/11 VUE, LOR PAO 187.00
10/28/11 PENN, CHRISTINE 2,199.26
10/28/11 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 880.94
Packet Page Number 25 of 259
10/28/11 ANDERSON, ALYSSA 13.56
10/28/11 BRUSOE, CRISTINA 37.20
10/28/11 BUCKLEY, BRITTANY 245.00
10/28/11 BAUDE, SARAH 91.25
10/28/11 BEITLER, JULIE 37.10
10/28/11 ANDERSON, MAXWELL 365.50
10/28/11 BAETZOLD, SETH 58.00
10/28/11 DIONNE, DANIELLE 164.25
10/28/11 DUNN, RYAN 1,085.01
10/28/11 CRANDALL, KRISTA 256.16
10/28/11 DEMPSEY, BETH 189.38
10/28/11 BUTLER, ANGELA 68.00
10/28/11 CLARK, PAMELA 19.30
10/28/11 HANSEN, HANNAH 337.80
10/28/11 HEINRICH, SHEILA 604.00
10/28/11 GRAY, MEGAN 150.33
10/28/11 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 355.60
10/28/11 ERICKSON-CLARK, CAROL 49.00
10/28/11 FONTAINE, KIM 528.88
10/28/11 JOYER, ANTHONY 74.00
10/28/11 KOHLER, ROCHELLE 54.00
10/28/11 IVES, RANDY 115.00
10/28/11 JOHNSON, BARBARA 187.55
10/28/11 HOLMBERG, LADONNA 520.50
10/28/11 HORWATH, RONALD 2,589.01
10/28/11 NADEAU, KELLY 236.76
10/28/11 NELSON, ELEONOR 25.00
10/28/11 LAMSON, ELIANA 72.00
10/28/11 MCCANN, NATALIE 50.00
10/28/11 KOLLER, NINA 359.01
10/28/11 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 814.13
10/28/11 RESENDIZ, LORI 2,129.22
10/28/11 RICHTER, DANIEL 113.40
10/28/11 PROESCH, ANDY 576.10
10/28/11 RANEY, COURTNEY 200.00
10/28/11 NORTHOUSE, KATHERINE 130.12
10/28/11 POVLITZKI, MARINA 38.00
10/28/11 SCHREIER, ROSEMARIE 172.00
10/28/11 SCHREINER, MARK 69.35
10/28/11 ROTH, DEEPALI 135.00
10/28/11 SCHMIDT, EMILY 36.20
10/28/11 RONNING, ISAIAH 293.23
10/28/11 RONNING, ZACCEUS 82.13
10/28/11 TAYLOR, JASON 109.75
10/28/11 THORWICK, MEGAN 117.60
10/28/11 SMITH, ANN 162.40
10/28/11 SMITLEY, SHARON 336.70
10/28/11 SCHREINER, MICHELLE 69.88
10/28/11 SCHUNEMAN, GREGORY 33.20
10/28/11 WARNER, CAROLYN 316.80
10/28/11 WEDES, CARYL 99.00
10/28/11 TUPY, HEIDE 45.80
10/28/11 TUPY, MARCUS 237.50
10/28/11 TREPANIER, TODD 484.00
10/28/11 TRUE, ANDREW 43.43
10/28/11 PETERSON, KELLY 162.00
10/28/11 BEHAN, JAMES 1,918.06
10/28/11 HITE, ANDREA 191.00
10/28/11 PENN, CAYLA 198.00
10/28/11 BOSLEY, CAROL 67.50
10/28/11 DANIEL, BREANNA 157.75
10/28/11 LONETTI, JAMES 480.00
10/28/11 COLEMAN, PATRICK 180.00
10/28/11 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,320.90
Packet Page Number 26 of 259
9985450
9985461
9985462
9985463
9985464
9985465
9985466
9985467
9985468
9985469
9985470
9985471
9985472
9985473
9985474
9985475
9985476
9985477
9985478
9985479
9985480
9985481
9985482
9985483
9985484
9985485
9985486
9985487
10/28/11 PRINS, KELLY 1,286.15
10/28/11 REILLY, MICHAEL 1,915.75
10/28/11 MALONEY, SHAUNA 292.50
10/28/11 PRIEM, STEVEN 2,392.46
10/28/11 WOEHRLE, MATTHEW 2,223.26
10/28/11 VANG, PETER 36.25
10/28/11 AICHELE, CRAIG 2,422.40
10/28/11 SCHULZE, KEVIN 564.00
10/28/11 THOMPSON, BENJAMIN 442.88
10/28/11 SZCZEPANSKI, JOSEPH 40.00
10/28/11 AYD, GWEN 75.00
10/28/11 FRANZEN, NICHOLAS 2,509.90
10/19/11 DANIEL, BREANNA 310.75
10/28/11 BERGO, CHAD 2,651.63
10/28/11 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 3,469.86
10/28/11 MASON, KYLE 96.00
10/28/11 MEISSNER, MICHAEL 33.00
10/28/11 FEIST, ASHLEY 39.00
10/28/11 KRENZ, CLARA 39.00
10/28/11 COLLOVA, MATT 36.00
10/28/11 ELLWANGER, HOLLY 39.00
10/28/11 VUKICH, CANDACE 114.38
10/28/11 YANG, CHINU 72.00
10/28/11 PETERSON, HAYLIE 156.00
10/28/11 ROKKE, MARINA 104.00
10/28/11 MIELZAREK, MAGGIE 26.00
10/28/11 O'BRIEN, PATRICIA 49.50
10/28/11 MCMAHON, MICHAEL 36.75
10/28/11 ROSTRON, ROBERT 573.60
10/28/11 LAMEYER, BRENT 97.75
10/28/11 MCLAURIN, CHRISTOPHER 43.00
10/28/11 VANG, TIM 313.50
10/28/11 FLUEGEL, LARISSA 158.55
10/28/11 STEFFEN, MICHAEL 87.00
498,588.33
10/28/11 WEINHAGEN, SHELBY 126.79
10/28/11 AUMOCK, KELLY 189.00
10/28/11 SMITH, CASEY 109.17
10/28/11 WALES, ABIGAIL 83.38
10/28/11 SCHUENEMAN, BENJAMIN 83.38
10/28/11 SCOTT, HALEY 14.70
Packet Page Number 27 of 259
Check Description Amount
85560 04911 TABLE LINENS MCC NOV 3 480.93
85561 04842 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION NSP - OCT 270.00
85562 01936 REIMB MILEAGE & INTERNET - OCT 81.55
85563 02728 PROJ 04-21 PROF SRVS THRU 09/30 42,758.35
02728 PROJ 09-08 PROF SRVS THRU 09/30 13,439.49
02728 PROJ 11-14 PROF SRVS THRU 09/30 11,018.70
85564 01941 VOLLEYBALL AWARDS 1,083.18
01941 SOFTBALL AWARDS 773.17
01941 SOCCER AWARDS 626.46
85565 04265 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION - OCT 541.50
85566 01337 TIF ADMIN EXPENSES 2010 3,133.92
85567 01337 PLANTS FOR NC RAINGARDENS 76.95
85568 01409 JOY PARK PHASE 2 7,541.95
85569 02274 SPRINT SRVS 9/15 -10/14 6,983.43
85570 04845 RECYCLING - OCT 27,499.50
85571 01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 57.11
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 15.00
85572 02347 REGISTRATION FEES 420.00
02347 REGISTRATION FEE 210.00
85573 00064 SECURITY OFFICER 10/15 EVENT ADDL 17.50
85574 04951 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 50.00
85575 04848 MONTHLY PREMIUM - NOV 245.40
85576 03744 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 100.00
85577 04419 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 150.00
85578 03958 REIMB FOR MEALS 9/26 - 10/19 32.16
85579 01869 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 100.00
85580 01865 1ST HALF VB ASSIGNMENTS THRU 10/28 504.00
85581 00211 PROJ 11-15 PROF SRVS THRU 10/14 2,612.50
85582 04549 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION - OCT 195.50
85583 02585 STRESS TEST FOR PD FITNESS PROG 170.00
85584 02929 LTC MONTHLY PREMIUM - NOV 479.54
85585 01871 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 375.00
85586 04345 PROJ 11-15 APPRAISALS 9,750.00
85587 04949 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 75.00
85588 00462 SIREN REPAIR 126.72
85589 00003 ESCROW REL SHELTER CONST 2317 BOXW 2,500.00
85590 02081 WINDOW CLEANING MCC 795.89
02081 WINDOW CLEANING CITY CAMPUS 432.62
02081 WINDOW CLEANING CITY CAMPUS 389.69
02081 WINDOW CLEANING CITY CAMPUS 309.88
85591 04867 PROF SRVS THRU 10/07 4,493.30
85592 04421 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 50.00
85593 00612 REPAIR TO FITNESS EQUIP - MCC 900.00
85594 04947 JOY PARK PHASE II 94,761.97
85595 00644 MONTHLY PREMIUM - NOV 11,217.97
85596 04952 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 150.00
85597 03538 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 525.00
85598 04950 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 225.00
85599 00767 REIMB FOR UNIFORM 10/26 39.90
85600 03978 CATERING FISH CREEK CLOSING 10/25 534.38
85601 03581 REIMB FOR MEALS 10/18 - 10/19 18.11
85602 04377 MEDIA SRVS FOR MCC 350.00
85603 03818 MONTHLY PREMIUM - NOV 144,750.4711/08/2011 MEDICA
11/08/2011 KANE'S CATERING SERVICE, INC
11/08/2011 BRETT KROLL
11/08/2011 MEDIA SAVANT COMMUNICATIONS
11/08/2011 PATRICK JAMES HUBBARD
11/08/2011 JERRY JOHNSON
11/08/2011 KEVIN A JOHNSON
11/08/2011 HARDRIVES, INC.
11/08/2011 HEALTHPARTNERS
11/08/2011 MELISSA HOARN
11/08/2011 FOTH INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIR
11/08/2011 TRACEY FREDRICK
11/08/2011 GYM WORKS INC
11/08/2011 FINAL TOUCH SERVICES, LLC
11/08/2011 FINAL TOUCH SERVICES, LLC
11/08/2011 FINAL TOUCH SERVICES, LLC
11/08/2011 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC.
11/08/2011 ESCROW REFUND
11/08/2011 FINAL TOUCH SERVICES, LLC
11/08/2011 KENNETH COOPER
11/08/2011 DAHLEN, DWYER & FOLEY INC.
11/08/2011 WILSON EDWARDS
11/08/2011 JAN ALICE CAMPBELL
11/08/2011 CENTRAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
11/08/2011 CNAGLAC
11/08/2011 DALE BOETTCHER
11/08/2011 DON BOWMAN
11/08/2011 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP.
11/08/2011 ANTHONY BARILLA, JR
11/08/2011 LOUISE A. BEAMAN
11/08/2011 MARKESE BENJAMIN
11/08/2011 MARK ALDRIDGE
11/08/2011 ANTHONY J. ANDERSON
11/08/2011 AVESIS
11/08/2011 XCEL ENERGY
11/08/2011 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER
11/08/2011 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER
11/08/2011 SPRINT
11/08/2011 TENNIS SANITATION LLC
11/08/2011 XCEL ENERGY
11/08/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
11/08/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
11/08/2011 S.E.H.
11/08/2011 PATRICK TROPHIES
11/08/2011 PATRICK TROPHIES
11/08/2011 MARIA PIRELA
11/08/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
11/08/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
11/08/2011 PATRICK TROPHIES
11/08/2011 MARY JOSEPHINE ANDERSON
11/08/2011 CHAD BERGO
11/08/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
Check Register
City of Maplewood
11/04/2011
Date Vendor
11/02/2011 DECKCI DECOR
Packet Page Number 28 of 259
85604 01085 MONTHLY PREMIUM - NOV 3,703.30
85605 01126 MONTHLY PREMIUM - NOV 432.00
85606 00001 REIMB M DITTEL DRIVEWAY APRON 2,323.75
85607 00001 REIMB D JOHNSON DRIVEWAY APRON 1,767.03
85608 00001 REIMB B CORTEZ DRIVEWAY APRON 1,469.72
85609 00001 REIMB L DITTEL DRIVEWAY APRON 1,322.27
85610 00001 REFUND H VANG TRANS MEDIC 983.56
85611 00001 REIMB S HANSON DRIVEWAY APRON 451.20
85612 00001 REIMB T CARLSTROM DRIVEWAY APRON 262.40
85613 00001 REFUND T MALLET MEDICA BENEFIT 100.00
85614 00001 REFUND H CYLKOWSKI MEMBERSHIP 90.00
85615 00001 REFUND C CORDELL HP BENEFIT 60.00
85616 00001 REFUND M BROWER KARATE CLASS 56.00
85617 00001 REFUND XIONG/YANG BCBS BENEFIT 40.00
85618 00001 REFUND K OSLUND HP BENEFIT 40.00
85619 00001 REFUND N JOYER MEMBERSHIP 37.49
85620 01863 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 675.00
85621 04953 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 75.00
85622 04954 BELLY DANCE INSTRUCTION 9/21-10/26 244.80
85623 04201 SIREN MAINTENANCE 4,876.00
85624 04432 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 375.00
85625 03446 DEER REMOVAL - OCT 230.00
85626 02663 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 100.00
85627 01418 CARVER GYM CONCESSIONS 278.74
85628 04948 PAINTING MCC AQUATIC AREA PROJ 9,685.00
85629 04074 TAI CHI INSTRUCTION FALL 2ND SESSION 285.00
85630 04412 CONTROL LIGHTS AT HAZELWOOD 300.00
85631 01488 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 1/1 - 10/31 31.30
85632 00198 WATER UTILITY 2,222.17
00198 KENNARD IRRIGATION 15.81
85633 01915 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 300.00
85634 04055 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 7/5 - 10/27 117.60
85635 00529 LTD PLAN 4043120-2 - NOV 3,065.61
00529 STD PLAN 4043120-1 - NOV 2,201.00
85636 04501 FALL 2011 CLEANUP - ELECTRONICS 3,145.48
85637 02350 DISPOSAL OF MCC THEATER PROPS 440.00
85638 04106 SERVICE CALL MCC BANQUET ROOM 2,618.00
85639 01872 REFS 1ST HALF VOLLEYBALL THRU 10/28 200.00
439,058.9280Checks in this report.
11/08/2011 VASKO ROLL-OFF SERVICE
11/08/2011 W.L. HALL CO.
11/08/2011 MARK WEBER
11/08/2011 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
11/08/2011 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
11/08/2011 UNIVERSAL RECYCLING TECH, LLC
11/08/2011 ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS
11/08/2011 NANCY STEFFEN
11/08/2011 JAMES TAYLOR
11/08/2011 REED SCHRANKLER
11/08/2011 CHRISTINE SOUTTER
11/08/2011 ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS
11/08/2011 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
11/08/2011 DANIEL K. SCHAITBERGER
11/08/2011 ELAINE SCHRADE
11/08/2011 EUGENE E. RICHARDSON
11/08/2011 RICK JOHNSON DEER & BEAVER INC
11/08/2011 CARL SAARION
11/08/2011 BARTON JAMES PECK
11/08/2011 BERYIMAR PEROZO
11/08/2011 READY WATT
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ROGER PACKER
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR
11/08/2011 MN LIFE INSURANCE
11/08/2011 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE
Packet Page Number 29 of 259
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee Description Amount
10/26/2011 10/31/2011 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 91,009.95
10/26/2011 10/31/2011 P.E.R.A.P.E.R.A.86,366.11
10/28/2011 10/31/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 29,898.48
10/28/2011 10/31/2011 Pitney Bowes Postage 2,985.00
10/26/2011 11/1/2011 MidAmerica - ING HRA Flex plan 13,636.90
10/26/2011 11/1/2011 Labor Unions Union Dues 3,634.48
10/26/2011 11/1/2011 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 19,808.80
10/31/2011 11/1/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 27,040.35
10/31/2011 11/1/2011 US Bank Merchant Services Credit Card Billing fee 2,354.51
11/1/2011 11/2/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 36,525.43
11/2/2011 11/3/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 35,871.70
10/28/2011 11/4/2011 Optum Health DCRP & Flex plan payments 3,802.08
11/3/2011 11/4/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 28,143.76
11/3/2011 11/4/2011 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 601.50
TOTAL 381,679.05
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Packet Page Number 30 of 259
AGENDA NO. G2
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Manager
RE: Approval of 2011 Budget Adjustments and Transfers for
Taste of Maplewood, North St. Paul JPA, Bruentrup Farm Fund
DATE: November 2, 2011
DISCUSSION
Taste of Maplewood
A transfer needs to be completed each year from the General Fund to the Taste of Maplewood Fund
to cover the net costs of the annual celebration. The budget also needs to be adjusted to reflect the
amount of the transfer. The net costs to date are $6,406.63. The following entries need to be
completed:
Budget Adjustment ($13,000) Transfer $6,406.63
North St. Paul JPA
This revenue source and corresponding costs were not included in the original budget document.
Budget adjustments need to be prepared to account for 2011 receipts.
Budget Adjustments
Brochure (Rec. Programs & MCC) $10,000
MCC Punch Cards $15,000
JPA (Rec. Programs, MCC & General Fund) $75,000
Bruentrup Farm Restoration Grant Fund
This fund established to account for the 2008 project needs to be closed. No funding source was
indicated in the original agenda reports stating where the City’s contribution to this project was to
come from. Staff is recommending a transfer from the Capital Improvements Projects Fund to take
care of the City’s contribution and close the Bruentrup Farm Restoration Grant Fund.
Budget Adjustment $14,575 Transfer $14,572.92
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council authorize the transfers noted above and direct the Finance
Manager to make the appropriate budget adjustments.
Packet Page Number 31 of 259
AGENDA NO. G3
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Contract with H. Alan Kantrud for 2012 City
Attorney and Prosecutor Services
DATE: November 2, 2011
INTRODUCTION/ BACKGROUND
The City of Maplewood has retained the services of Alan Kantrud as the City Attorney/City
Prosecutor since the middle of 2006. Mr. Kantrud is currently operating under a contract that
expires at the end of 2011. The current agreement with Mr. Kantrud has an automatic renewal
clause that required notice to Mr. Kantrud by September 30th that the City intended to not renew
or revise the agreement. The City Manager notified Mr. Kantrud in September that the City
intended to renegotiate the terms of his service, but wished to retain him under new contract
conditions.
The preliminary budget approved by the City Council in establishing the maximum levy called for
a very small increase in the cost for the services provided by Mr. Kantrud and his staff. The
current 2011 contract calls for Mr. Kantrud to provide full-time service as the City Attorney and
the City Prosecutor, as well as providing for office space for Mr. Kantrud and his assistant. Mr.
Kantrud requested a small increase in the service that he provides, because he has not received
an increase for 2+ years. A review of Mr. Kantrud and his team’s service by the Management
Team has revealed a satisfactory performance and acceptable level of prosecution and
interaction as the City Attorney and as the City Prosecutor.
The proposed contract for 2012, proposes that Mr. Kantrud’s salary be increased from the
current level of $198,000 to the proposed amount of $204,000, which is a 3.03% increase. This
is partially offset in a monthly rental charge that is levied to Mr. Kantrud of $1,450 per month.
This has been increased by $200.00 per month over the current contract, as Mr. Kantrud is
being provided a larger office, as well as a private office for his assistant, who is currently
provided a cubical. Thus, the financial impact of this to the General Fund is the $6,000 increase
in fees, less the increase in rental expense of $2,400; or an increase of $3,600, which is a
1.82% increase in net payment to Mr. Kantrud and his associates. Mr. Kantrud is also provided
with High Deductible Health Insurance and Dental Insurance consistent with the contracts for Mr.
Antonen and Mr. Ahl. A final change in the contract from 2011 to 2012 is that Mr. Kantrud will no
longer be provided with a membership at Maplewood Community Center and will provide for his
own cell phone plan.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached contract with H. Alan Kantrud for
2012 as City Attorney/City Prosecutor and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute said
contract.
Attachments:
1. Contract for Attorney Services
Packet Page Number 32 of 259
1
City of Maplewood Contract for Attorney Services
This AGREEMENT entered into this _____day of _________, 20__, (the “Effective
Date”) by and between the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as
“City”) and H. Alan Kantrud P.A. H Alan Kantrud P.A. (hereinafter referred to as
“Kantrud” or “Attorney” or “Firm”).
WHEREAS, in 2006 the City originally put forth a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) to
contract out its legal services for 2 years and in response to that RFP retained Attorney as
its City Attorney and City Prosecutor on or about July 10, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the City has found Attorney’s performance as City Attorney to be
competent and professional and has continued to retain his services; and
WHEREAS, the City’s original term of two years as set forth in the RFP expired, as has
the extensions of the contract through 2011; and
WHEREAS, the City believes it is in the best interests of the City to maintain consistency
in its legal representation; and
WHEREAS, the City now desires to enter into a contract for the continued services of
Attorney as City Attorney to assure his continued performance of that position through
2012; and
WHEREAS, Attorney is agreeable to entering into a contract with the City pursuant to
the understated proposed terms and conditions
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the
parties agree as follows:
Section 1. Duties
The City hereby agrees to retain Attorney as the City Attorney and Prosecutor to perform
the functions and duties of City Attorney and Prosecutor and such other legally
permissible and proper functions and duties as the City Manager, Assistant City Manager
and City Council from time to time shall assign. Said duties shall be consistent with and
guided by the course-of-conduct established through the previous period of representation
and the parties agree that the established duties thereof are mutually satisfactory. It is
further agreed that (a) Attorney shall endeavor to establish additional pro-active programs
in the area of Domestic Abuse in cooperation with the Maplewood Police Chief during
said term of this contract. (b)Attorney shall remain part of the management team and
attend the Tuesday morning staff meetings.
Section 2. Term
It is agreed the term of services shall be January1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 33 of 259
2
Section 3. Salary
The City agrees to pay Firm for services rendered pursuant hereto at an annual base rate
of $204,000.00 per year, payable to attorney in the same manner as it is currently paid -
in monthly installments of $17,000.00. The City shall provide a private office for
Attorney’s assistant to enhance the efficiency of the interaction and reduce costs to the
City for CSO and vehicle time. The City shall rent Attorney a corner office space
including computer, printer, fax and normal office services and supplies. The Attorney
shall pay a monthly rental fee of $1,450.00 for rental of such space and such services and
supplies. The City shall provide and maintain High Deductible Health Insurance and
Dental Insurance for Attorney consistent with the terms provided to City Manager and
Assistant City Manager. The City shall discontinue the previously provided single
membership at the Maplewood Community Center (MCC). Attorney shall provide his
own cell phone plan and coverage independent of City plans and no reimbursement shall
be provided by City for said plan.
General Provisions
A. The text herein shall constitute the entire Agreement between the parties hereto.
B. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs at law and
executors of Attorney.
C. If any provision or portion thereof contained in this Agreement shall be held
unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, it shall be deemed severable and the remainder
of this Agreement shall not be affected and shall remain in fill force and effect.
D. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of
the City to terminate the services of Attorney at any time, because of malfeasance,
nonfeasance or gross misconduct.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties here to have signed and executed this Agreement,
both in duplicate, effective on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ATTORNEY
_____________________ ________________________
Jim Antonen, City Manager H. Alan Kantrud
_____________________
Will Rossbach, Mayor
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 34 of 259
Packet Page Number 35 of 259
Packet Page Number 36 of 259
Packet Page Number 37 of 259
Packet Page Number 38 of 259
Packet Page Number 39 of 259
Packet Page Number 40 of 259
AGENDA NO. G5
AGENDA REPORT
To:
From: Finance Manager
City Manager
Re: Approval of Resolution Adopting Ambulance Rates for 2012
Date: November 8, 2011
BACKGROUND
Staff is asking the City Council to consider this request to approve a 3% increase in rates for
2012.
Ambulance rates have been increased over the past several years, most notably with a 21%
increase for 2008. The Medicare law that became effective in 2002 has resulted in decreasing
collection rates from 65.3% to less than 50%. The last property tax subsidy to the Ambulance
Fund was in 2005. The Medicare law limits allowed rates as follows:
2010 2011
Basic life support $340.23 $340.37
Advanced life support 1 404.03 404.19
Advanced life support 2 584.78 585.01
Charge per mile 6.87 6.86
The City’s established rates for 2011 and proposed for 2012 are as follows:
2011 2012
Non-transport $ 583.00 $ 600.00
Basic life support 1,540.00 1,586.00
Advanced life support 1 2,024.00 2,085.00
Advanced life support 2 2,233.00 2,300.00
Charge per mile 19.98 20.58
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests approval of the attached resolution setting Ambulance rates for 2012 at the above
rates shown.
Packet Page Number 41 of 259
2
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE 2012 AMBULANCE RATES
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has established ambulance rates,
and
WHEREAS, city staff has reviewed the ambulance rates.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that:
1. The updated ambulance rates with a 3% increase shall become
effective beginning January 1, 2012, with rates set as follows:
Non-transport $ 600.00
Basic life support 1,586.00
Advanced life support 1 2,085.00
Advanced life support 2 2,300.00
Charge per mile 20.58
2. The updated ambulance rates are approved for all related ambulance
runs received on or after January 1, 2012.
3. The rates shown will be reviewed by staff on an annual basis with
recommendations for revisions brought to the city council for
consideration.
Packet Page Number 42 of 259
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer
Bill Priefer, Public Works Operations Analyst
SUBJECT: Approve Resolution Accepting State Aid Advancement Funds
DATE: November 1, 2011
INTRODUCTION
There are currently no funds available in our Municipal State Aid Street account. We have applied for
payment on Project 02-07, County Road D/T.H. 61 to Southlawn Avenue, but are unable to get paid by
Mn/DOT until there is a positive balance in our account. In order to address the shortfall, we are able to
apply for and receive an advance on future funds. Council action for the request is required.
BACKGROUND
Each year a certain amount of money at the state level is available to cities in our situation for advance
encumbrances. An advance encumbrance is essentially an interest-free loan to the city to be repaid
with future allotments. This is a good program for cities like ours that had aggressive construction
programs, as it allows the utilization of funds that other cities are not using. This replaces the City’s
bonding requirement for project improvements.
The State Aid advance funding guidelines recently changed to allow municipalities to advance up to five
times their annual construction allotment or $4,000,000, or whichever is less. Our 2011 construction
allotment of $998,419 allows us to request up to $4,000,000. However, we currently have an advance
of $3,000,000 which allows us to request an additional advance of $1,000,000 at this time.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution requesting an advance
encumbrance of $1,000,000 to our Municipal State Aid Street account.
Attachment:
1. Resolution
Agenda Item G6
Packet Page Number 43 of 259
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET FUNDS ADVANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Municipality of Maplewood desires to receive payments on public improvements to our
State Aid Street system which will require State Aid funds in excess of those available in its State Aid
Construction Account, and
WHEREAS, the advance is based on the following determination of expenditures:
Account Balance as of November 1, 2011: $ 0
Less estimated disbursements for:
Project 138-121-003
Project 138-121-004
Project 138-112-005
Total Advancement Amount: $ 1,000,000.
WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes 162.14, Subd. 6 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8820.1500, Subp. 10b, and
WHEREAS, the Municipality acknowledges advance funds are released on a first-come-first-serve basis
and this resolution does not guarantee the availability of funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved: That the Commissioner of Transportation be and is hereby
requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Projects of the Municipality
of Maplewood in an amount up to $1,000,000. I hereby authorize repayments from subsequent accruals to the
Municipal State Aid Street Construction Account of said Municipality in accordance with the schedule herein
indicated:
Repayment from entire future year allocations until fully repaid
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted
by the Municipality of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, at a duly authorized Municipal Council
Meeting held in the Municipality of Maplewood, Minnesota on the 14th day of November, 2011, as disclosed by the
records of said Municipality on file and of record in the office.
Municipality of Maplewood ______________________________
Municipal Clerk
Agenda Item G6
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 44 of 259
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, Dep. Public Works Director/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Authorizing Mn/DOT Agency Agreement
DATE: November 1, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The city council will consider adopting a resolution approving a standard agency delegated contracting
process agreement with Mn/DOT.
DISCUSSION
This is a standard agreement that 87 counties and over 80 municipalities enter into with Mn/DOT. The
agreement covers all federally funded projects that the City of Maplewood is awarded funds for
including those listed in the State Transportation Improvement Program.
Upon approval of the agreement Mn/DOT is authorized to act as the City’s agent in accepting federal
aid in connection with such projects.
BUDGET
No funding is required for this action.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution approving Mn/DOT Agency
Agreement No. 99900.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
Agenda Item G7
Packet Page Number 45 of 259
RESOLUTION
APPROVING MN/DOT AGENCY AGREEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Stat. Sec. 161.36, the Commissioner of
Transportation be appointed as Agent of the City of Maplewood to accept as its agent, federal
aid funds which may be made available for eligible transportation related projects.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into an agreement with the
Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms and conditions of said federal aid
participation as set forth and contained in “Minnesota Department of Transportation Agency
Agreement No. 99900, a copy of which said agreement was before the City Council and which
is made a part hereof by reference.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution
presented to and adopted by the City of Maplewood at a duly authorized meeting thereof held
on the 14th day of November, 2011, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my
possession.
_____________________________
City Clerk
Notary Public
My Commission expires __________
(SEAL)
Agenda Item G7
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 46 of 259
Agenda Item G8
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting A Donation to the Fire Department
from Chris Larson
DATE: October 31, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The fire department has received a donation from Chris Larson of North St. Paul and city council
approval is required before this donation can be accepted.
BACKGROUND
Chris Larson sent the fire department a $200 check with a letter stating her appreciation for all that
the firefighters do.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the city council approve to accept this $200 donation and that the necessary
budget adjustments be made so the funds can be expended by the fire department as needed.
Packet Page Number 47 of 259
Agenda Item G8
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GIFT TO CITY
WHEREAS, Maplewood is AUTHORIZED to receive and accept grants, gifts and devices of real and
personal property and maintain the same for the benefit of the citizens and pursuant to the donor’s terms if
so-prescribed, and;
WHEREAS, Chris Larson wished to grant the city of Maplewood the following: $200.00, and;
WHEREAS, Chris Larson has instructed that the City will be required to use the aforementioned for: use by
the fire department, and;
WHEREAS, the city of Maplewood has agreed to use the subject of this resolution for the purposes and
under the terms prescribed, and;
WHEREAS, the City agrees that it will accept the gift by a four-fifths majority of its governing body’s
membership pursuant to Minnesota Statute §465.03;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to Minnesota Statute §465.03, that the Maplewood
City Council approves, receives and accepts the gift aforementioned and under such terms and conditions as
may be requested or required.
The Maplewood City Council passed this resolution by four-fifths or more majority vote of its membership
on ________________________________, 20______.
Signed: Signed: Witnessed:
________________________ _________________________ __________________________
(Signature) (Signature) (Signature)
Mayor ____ Chief of Fire City Clerk .
(Title) (Title) (Title)
________________________ _________________________ __________________________
(Date) (Date) (Date)
Packet Page Number 48 of 259
AGENDA NO. G9
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Manager
RE: RESOLUTION APPROVING CERTIFICATION OF SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS FOR UNPAID AMBULANCE BILLS
DATE: November 7, 2011
BACKGROUND
Annually the City levies special assessments for unpaid ambulance bills on property
within Ramsey County. During the past 12 months, letters were sent to individuals that
had unpaid ambulance bills. The letters indicated that the balance due for ambulance
services along with 10% interest would be added to their 2012 property taxes if
payment was not made within 30 days. A few payments were received in response to
these letters. The remaining unpaid bills in the amount of $5,473.70 plus 10% interest
of $547.37 should be certified as special assessments.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted to certify $6,021.07 of
unpaid ambulance bills for collection with 2012 property taxes which includes interest
at the rate of ten percent on the total amount for one year.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Ambulance Charges Assessment Record
Packet Page Number 49 of 259
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following ambulance bills totaling
$6,021.07 for collection with the taxes of said property owner for the year
2011, collectible in 2012, which includes interest at the rate of ten percent
(10%) on the total amount for one year.
Packet Page Number 50 of 259
P:\Agenda Reports\11.14.11\G9 Attachment - Copy of 111 certify ambulance
CERTIFIED RECORD COPY (COUNTY)AMBULANCE CHARGES ASSESSMENT RECORD
Name of City CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MN
Project Name AMBULANCE CHARGES Update Change *11/09/11
Desc. of Proj.Unpaid Ambulance Fees
Spec. Asmnt Code 57121202
RES #
Total Amnt of Proj. as levied $6,021.07
Yr. To Start Asmnt.2012
No. Yrs. Asmnt. Run 1
Interest Rate
Calc. Method 0
Extra days & Mo. 1st Yr. 0
Line No. AFSPCDAFSPMCAFROLLAFPARCAFSTYRAFYRRNAFAMTR1 57121202 0 R 362922140047 2012 1 211.71 521 Farrell Street N
2 57121202 0 R 182922130008 2012 1 583.00 1978 Adolphus
3 57121202 0 R 092922230007 2012 1 629.55 908 Connor Avenue E
4 57121202 0 R 182922420042 2012 1 2,700.98 142 Bellwood Avenue
5 57121202 0 R 132822340047 2012 1 98.43 2454 Schadt Drive
6 57121202 0 R 222922140124 2012 1 1,214.40 1705 E Nebraska Avenue
7 57121202 0 R 362922110036 2012 1 583.00 2706 Margaret Street
TOTAL =6,021.07
I hereby certify that the above information is a true and accurate record of the unpaid ambulance charges assessment roll as adopted by the Maplewood City Council.
Karen Guilfoile
City Clerk, City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Date
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 51 of 259
AGENDA NO. G10
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Manager
RE: RESOLUTION APPROVING CERTIFICATION OF SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS FOR UNPAID MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES
DATE: November 7, 2011
BACKGROUND
Annually the City levies special assessments for unpaid miscellaneous charges on property within
Ramsey County. These miscellaneous charges include items such as false alarms, lawn mowing and
other code enforcement issues. During the past 12 months, letters were sent to individuals that had
unpaid bills. The letters indicated that the balance due for the services along with 10% interest would
be added to their 2012 property taxes if payment was not made within 30 days. A few payments were
received in response to these letters. The remaining unpaid bills in the amount of $21,401.59 plus
10% interest of $2,140.16 should be certified as special assessments.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted to certify $23,541.75 of unpaid
miscellaneous charges for collection with 2012 property taxes which includes interest at the rate of ten
percent on the total amount for one year.
Attachments
1. Resolution
2. Miscellaneous Charges Assessment Record
Packet Page Number 52 of 259
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following miscellaneous charges
totaling $23,541.75 for collection with the taxes of said property owner for
the year 2011, collectible in 2012, which includes interest at the rate of ten
percent (10%) on the total amount for one year.
Packet Page Number 53 of 259
CERTIFIED RECORD COPY (COUNTY)MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES ASSESSMENT RECORD
Name of City CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MN
Project Name MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Update Change *11/09/11
Desc. of Proj.Unpaid Miscellaneous Fees
Spec. Asmnt Code 57121203
RES #
Total Amnt of Proj. as levied $23,541.75
Yr. To Start Asmnt.2012
No. Yrs. Asmnt. Run 1
Interest Rate
Calc. Method 0
Extra days & Mo. 1st Yr. 0
Line No. AFSPCDAFSPMCAFROLLAFPARCAFSTYRAFYRRNAFAMTR1 57121203 0 R 182922240016 2012 1 2,405.43 1943 Jackson Street N
2 57121203 0 R 092922310001 2012 1 110.00 1081 Hwy 36 E
3 57121203 0 R 112922340029 2012 1 27.50 1936 Craig Place
4 57121203 0 R 102922130042 2012 1 2,035.00 1623 Gervais Avenue E
5 57121203 0 R 132822220015 2012 1 1,567.50 2279 Dahl Avenue E
6 57121203 0 R 182922110053 2012 1 380.09 2112 Mississippi
7 57121203 0 R 142922340086 2012 1 343.75 1909 Larpenteur Avenue
8 57121203 0 R 242822230008 2012 1 146.96 2300 Carver Avenue E
9 57121203 0 R 182922440010 2012 1 343.75 1733 McMenemy Street N
10 57121203 0 R 102922330094 2012 1 1,223.75 2227 Birmingham Street
11 57121203 0 R 032922440022 2012 1 343.75 1741 County Road C E
12 57121203 0 R 012922210026 2012 1 1,223.75 3005 Mary Court N
13 57121203 0 R 152922230085 2012 1 1,223.75 2002 Clarence Court
14 57121203 0 R 252922410027 2012 1 1,223.75 895 Century Avenue N
15 57121203 0 R 182922430059 2012 1 2,112.88 1800 City Heights Drive N
16 57121203 0 R 182922430053 2012 1 770.00 1760 City Heights Drive N
17 57121203 0 R 092922240007 2012 1 343.75 2508 Forest Street N
18 57121203 0 R 182922340046 2012 1 1,223.75 1695 Abel Street N
19 57121203 0 R 022922140094 2012 1 343.75 2204 Maple Lane
20 57121203 0 R 022922320030 2012 1 687.50 1840 Radtaz Avenue
21 57121203 0 R 252922240083 2012 1 1,117.71 1070 Lakewood Drive
22 57121203 0 R 082922330056 2012 1 770.00 357 Laurie Road
23 57121203 0 R 012822120045 2012 1 1,302.18 2519 Brookview Drive
24 57121203 0 R 032922330036 2012 1 1,223.75 1324 Kohlman Avenue
25 57121203 0 R 092922440137 2012 1 343.75 1279 Lark Avenue
26 57121203 0 R 022922310021 2012 1 550.00 2811 White Bear Avenue
27 57121203 0 R 182922440014 2012 1 27.50 1734 Adolphus Street N
28 57121203 0 R 122822230430 2012 1 126.50 457 Mailand Court
TOTAL =23,541.75
I hereby certify that the above information is a true and accurate record of the unpaid ambulance charges assessment roll as adopted by the Maplewood City Council.
Karen Guilfoile
City Clerk, City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Date
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 54 of 259
Agenda Item G11
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Jim Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: November 7, 2011
RE: Resolution of Temporary Gambling Permits for Ramsey Nursing Home
Foundation
Introduction
Steve Fritzke representing Ramsey Nursing Home Foundation has submitted four
applications for temporary gambling permit for Bingo Nights. The events will be held at
Ramsey Nursing Home Foundation 2000 White Bear Avenue on January 23, February
27, March 19 and October 15, 2012 from 5:00p.m. to 8:00p.m. It is requested the council
approve the following resolutions for the temporary gambling.
RESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that
the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Ramsey Nursing Home
Foundation 2000 White Bear Avenue for January 23, February 27, March 19 and
October 15, 2012.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the
timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling
Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application
as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council
of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their
approval.
Recommendation
It is recommended that council approve the lawful gambling resolution application for the
Ramsey Nursing Home Foundation.
Packet Page Number 55 of 259
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, City Engineer/Dep. Director of Public Works
Scott Schultz, Utility Superintendent
SUBJECT: Approval of Purchase of Two Submersible Sewage Pumps for Lift
Station #6
DATE: October 31, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The Sanitary Sewer Lift Station #6 located at 1035 Lakewood Drive North near Beaver Lake is in need
of pump replacement.
BACKGROUND
This lift station was built in 1986, and is the largest volume lift station in Maplewood. It is still operating
with the original pumps. Both pumps are nearing 20,000 hours of run time. This is several thousand
hours beyond the life expectancy of these pumps. In the past four years the pumps have experienced
considerable wear and have required extensive repair. It is no longer cost effective to repair them.
Considering the high volume of flow this station serves, replacing these pumps is essential.
BUDGET
The Finance Manager has verified the Sanitary Sewer operating fund has sufficient funds to cover the
cost of this priority replacement. Two quotes for the pumps are listed below:
WW Goetsch Associates, Inc.
Two new Hydromatic S8FX 40 hp pumps $31,360.00
Total including tax, freight and installation $35,316.00
SY/COM, Inc.
Two new Hydromatic S8FX 40 hp pumps $33,980.00
Total including tax, freight and installation $38,116.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase of the two pumps including tax, freight
and installation totaling $35,316.00 from WW Goetsch Associates, Inc.
Attachments:
1. WW Goetsch Associates Quote
2. SY/COM Quote
Agenda Item G12
Packet Page Number 56 of 259
Agenda Item G12
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 57 of 259
Agenda Item G12
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 58 of 259
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, City Engineer/Dep. Director of Public Works
Scott Schultz, Fleet Superintendent
Bryan Nagel, Street Superintendent
SUBJECT: Approval of Purchase of Toolcat 5610 F-series Work Machine
DATE: November 4, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The Public Works Department is in need of a Toolcat Work Machine to continue to provide adequate
maintenance service throughout the city. This piece of equipment is essential for sidewalk snow
removal, but will also be utilized year round by all divisions in Public Works as explained below. The
council will consider authorizing this purchase utilizing existing Public Works Operating budget funds.
BACKGROUND
Currently the City operates a Toolcat 5600 Work Machine. This machine was purchased in 2007. It
was an addition to the fleet at that time because of its versatile application throughout Public Works.
The Toolcat machines (5600 and 5610) can operate all of our current attachments that are used by
existing Bobcat Skid Loaders.
The purchase of the new Toolcat 5610 F-Series machine is needed due to the additional 6 miles of
sidewalk the city has acquired over the last two years, and forecasted future sidewalk installations.
With our current snow removal equipment we are unable to keep up with large snowfalls and are
unable to meet the city’s sidewalk snow removal policy that states sidewalks are to be cleared within 48
hours of the completion of street plowing operations. This machine will also be used for improved snow
removal at City Hall campus, the Community Center campus and throughout the City Wide Trail
System.
The Toolcat 5610 F-Series also has additional applications different from the Toolcat 5600. This
machine has a PTO Driven rear end. This will allow it to be utilized by the Parks and Street divisions in
the summer season. It can be used for Street mowing operations and it will be used by the Parks
Division for Ball Field maintenance and other Recreation Program Field maintenance needs.
Also, because of these additional applications this machine will perform, a large Capital Improvement
Fleet purchase planned for the Parks Division in 2013 can be eliminated in the amount of $30,000.00.
BUDGET
The amount quoted for the machine under MN State Contract #2979 is $51,246.71. This high priority
purchase will be funded equally by three Publics Works Operating Funds. The Finance Manager has
verified the Public Works budget has adequate funds for the amounts listed:
Street (101-502) $17,082.25
Snow and Ice (101-514) $17,082.23
Parks (101-602) $17,082.23
Total Cost $51,246.71
Agenda Item G13
Packet Page Number 59 of 259
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase of the Toolcat 5610 F-Series Work
Machine under MN State Contract #2979 from Tri-State Bobcat, Inc including tax, delivery and training
totaling $51,246.71 utilizing existing operating funds from the Public Works Department budget.
Attachments:
1. Tri State Bobcat Quote
Agenda Item G13
Packet Page Number 60 of 259
Product Quotation
Quotation Number: 859F08779
Date: 2011-11-03 11:40:15
Ship to Bobcat Dealer Bill To
City of Maplewood
1902 E County Rd B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Phone: 651-770-4553
Fax: 651-777-9543
Tri-State Bobcat, Inc
3101 Spruce St
Little Canada MN 55117
Phone: (651) 407-3727
Fax: (651) 217-5770
---------------------------
Contact: Patrick Schoen
Phone: 651-407-3727
Fax: 651-217-5770
Cellular: 612-356-8890
E Mail: patricks@tristatebobcat.com
City of Maplewood
1902 E County Rd B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Phone: 651-770-4553
Fax: 651-777-9543
Description Part No Qty Price Ea. Total
Toolcat 5610 F-Series M1003 1 $55,604.00 $55,604.00
Bolt-On Cutting Edge, 62" 6718005 1 $190.71 $190.71
62" General Purpose Bucket 7114585 1 $682.00 $682.00
Total for this Machine $56,476.71
Description Part No Qty Price Ea. Total
SB200 Snowblower - 60" Width M7001 1 $2,860.20 $2,860.20
--- 9.6 Hyd Motor Package (25 - 31 gpm) M7001-R01-C04 1 $792.40 $792.40
Total for these items $3,652.60
Description Part No Qty Price Ea. Total
60" Snow V-Blade, 7 Pin 7104861 1 $2,595.60 $2,595.60
Total for these items $2,595.60
Description Part No Qty Price Ea. Total
100" Snow & Light Material Bucket 6727787 1 $1,239.70 $1,239.70
--- Bolt-On Cutting Edge, 100" 6715464 1 $267.35 $267.35
Total for these items $1,507.05
Total of Items Quoted $64,231.96
Freight Charges $661.20
Discount Bobcat Municipal Discount ($8,471.51)
Discount Tri-State Bobcat Municipal Discount ($8,471.51)
Sales total before Taxes $47,950.14
Taxes: State of Minnesota $3,296.57
Quote Total - US dollars $51,246.71
Notes:
All prices subject to change without prior notice or obligation. This price quote supersedes all preceding price quotes.
Customer must exercise his purchase option within 30 days from quote date.
Customer Acceptance: Purchase Order: ___________________________
Authorized Signature:
Print:_________________________ Sign:_________________________ Date: ________
Agenda Item G13
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 61 of 259
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Steven Love, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Installation of No-Parking Signs at Mayhill Road & 7th Street
DATE: October 21, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The City Council will consider the installation of No-Parking signs at the intersection of Mayhill Road
and 7th Street. Public Works staff received a request to review current placement of the No-Parking
signs along 7th Street and the effects these signs have on the intersection of Mayhill Road and 7th
Street. Council review of the request is recommended.
BACKGROUND
A letter was received by Public Works from the residence of 2713 7th Street East (see attachment) in
2007 requesting the installation of “No-Parking” signs in front of their house to deal with issues such
as vehicles blocking the mail boxes, no available parking for visitors, and damage to the front lawn
caused by vehicles parking in front of their house that work at the Century Animal Clinic. It was also
noted that at the time of the letter that there were “No-Parking” signs located along the south side of
7th Street east of Mayhill Road.
According to the May 30, 2007 Agenda Report, No Parking Sighs on 7th Street, East of Century
Avenue, (see attachment) the following observations were noted:
“This is a common problem with older businesses in Maplewood that do not have adequate
on-street parking available to them.”
“Unfortunately there is no way to require more on-site parking for the vet clinic.”
The recommendation of the Agenda Report was to install bituminous curb along the road, because
shifting the “No-Parking” signs to the north side of the street would only shift the issue further down
the street or onto adjacent streets.
The current conditions have parking restricted on the north side of 7th Street for the following times:
Monday – Friday from 7 a.m. – 5 p.m.
Saturday from 7 a.m. – 1 p.m.
There are currently no parking restrictions on the south side of 7th Street or Mayhill Road.
In order to see how parking habits have changed I reviewed the aerial photographs from 2006, 2008,
and 2009 (see attachments). In 2006 vehicles can be seen parked towards the east end of 7th street
along the north side of 7th. In 2008 and 2009 vehicles are seen parked on the south side of 7th Street
Agenda Item G14
Packet Page Number 62 of 259
just east of the intersection of Mayhill Road and on the east side of Mayhill Road just south of the
intersection. During a site visit on September 30, 2011 I witnessed similar parking patterns.
CONCLUSIONS
The “No-Parking” signs along the north side of 7th Street have accomplished the goal of keeping the
business parking located along or closer to the business property, but have shifted the issue to a new
location. By shifting the signs back to the south we will be further extending the debate of which side
should have the parking restrictions. The issue today is one of sight distance impact at the
intersection of 7th Street and Mayhill Road.
Parking restriction for an intersection according to MN State Statue and City Code do not apply to an
uncontrolled intersection without a sidewalk such as Mayhill Road and 7th Street. Therefore, I would
propose the following short term solution and possible long term solution for this issue.
Short Term Solution
o Coordinate with Public Works to restrict parking by installing “No-Parking” signs 30 feet
from the tangent points of the road on the south side of 7th and Mayhill Road south of
the intersection (see attached map)
Long Term Solution
o As part of a future street reconstruction project, work with the property owners to add
additional on street parking along the south side of 7th Street adjacent to the business
parking and coordinate with owners for a possible parking lot expansion
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the city council approve the recommendation to install “No-Parking” signs 30
feet from the tangent points of the road on the south side of 7th Street and on Mayhill Road south of
the intersection.
Attachments:
1. 2007 Letter from 2713 7th Street
2. 2007 No-Parking Signs Agenda Report
3. 2006, 2008, & 2009 Aerial Maps
4. Proposed No-Parking Sign Location Map
Agenda Item G14
Packet Page Number 63 of 259
Agenda Item G14
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 64 of 259
Agenda Item G14
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 65 of 259
Agenda Item G14
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 66 of 259
Agenda Item G14
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 67 of 259
Agenda Item G14
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 68 of 259
Agenda Item G14
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 69 of 259
DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and
data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only.
SOURCES: Ramsey County (August 29, 2011), The Lawrence Group;August 29, 2011 for County parcel and property records data; August 2011 for commercial and residential data; April 2009 for color aerial imagery; All Agenda Item G14 Attachment 3Packet Page Number 70 of 259
DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and
data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only.
SOURCES: Ramsey County (August 29, 2011), The Lawrence Group;August 29, 2011 for County parcel and property records data; August 2011 for commercial and residential data; April 2009 for color aerial imagery; All Agenda Item G14 Attachment 3Packet Page Number 71 of 259
DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and
data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only.
SOURCES: Ramsey County (August 29, 2011), The Lawrence Group;August 29, 2011 for County parcel and property records data; August 2011 for commercial and residential data; April 2009 for color aerial imagery; All Agenda Item G14 Attachment 3Packet Page Number 72 of 259
DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and
data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only.
SOURCES: Ramsey County (August 29, 2011), The Lawrence Group;August 29, 2011 for County parcel and property records data; August 2011 for commercial and residential data; April 2009 for color aerial imagery; All Agenda Item G14 Attachment 4Packet Page Number 73 of 259
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Steven Love, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Installation of Stop Signs at Sandhurst Avenue & Kennard
Street
DATE: October 28, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The City Council will consider the installation of stop signs at the intersection of Sandhurst Avenue &
Kennard Street. Public Works staff received a petition requesting the intersection to be signed as an
all-way stop. Council action on the request is recommended.
BACKGROUND
A petition was received by Public Works from the residents of 1627 Sandhurst Avenue (see
attachment) requesting the intersection of Sandhurst Avenue & Kennard Street be signed as an all-
way stop (see attachment). The petition noted that there was an accident at the intersection in July of
2011 and there is concern for the safety of children who may be playing or biking in the street. The
parking lot for Sherwood Park is located approximately 400 feet north of the intersection of Sandhurst
and Kennard on the west side of Kennard Street.
The placement of stop signs in the city is regulated by and consistent with the Minnesota Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Mn MUTCD). This manual is adopted by the city ordinance to
regulate all street signage, markings, and signals. City staff and the City’s consultant S.E.H. have
evaluated the intersection with respect to the criteria set forth by the Mn MUTCD for the application of
stop signs. City staff gathered traffic volume data at the intersection and speed data on Kennard
Street north of the intersection. S.E.H. performed site investigations, reviewed the collected traffic
data, and provided an intersection evaluation memo (see attachment).
S.E.H.’s memo, dated October 25, 2011, states that the intersection failed to meet the minimum
criteria set for by Mn MUTCD for an all-way stop under the following categories:
Vehicle Crash History
o An intersection with 5 or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are
susceptible to correction by an all-way stop is considered to have a crash problem (Mn
MUTCD Criteria)
o Police records show that there has been only 1 crash in the last 6 years at this
intersection which is well below the above listed criteria
Agenda Item G15
Packet Page Number 74 of 259
Traffic Volume
o The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total
of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an
average day (Mn MUTCD Criteria)
o The total averaged vehicles per day (both approaches), 160 vehicle on Kennard Street
and 130 on Sandhurst Avenue, are well below the 300 vehicles per hour criteria listed
above
Traffic Speed
o If the 85th-percential approach speed , that speed below which 85% of the traffic is
traveling, of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume
warrants are 70 percent of the values listed above
o This rule does not apply as the 85th-percential approach speed north of the intersection
is 30 mph which is below the above listed criteria
S.E.H.’s field review of the intersection revealed sight restrictions at the intersection which impact the
speed at which drivers can safely access the intersection. It was further noted that even if sight
restrictions were improved through mediation efforts this would not fully resolve the relatively low safe
approach speeds. The Mn MUTCD provides for the use of engineering judgment in the case of
restricted sight distance and the potential use of stop signs. S.E.H.’s memo provided the following
recommendation:
“Due to the relatively low safe approach speeds to access this intersection, with or without
improved sight distance, we recommend the stop signs be installed on Sandhurst Avenue at
Kennard Street.”
CONCLUSIONS
Staff has reviewed the October 25, 2011 memo from S.E.H. along with the traffic data and
recommends the installation of stop signs at the intersection of Sandhurst Avenue and Kennard Street
in order to sign the intersection as an all-way stop. This recommendation will address the issue of
sight restrictions and relatively low safe approach speeds as noted in the October 25, 2011 memo
from S.E.H. and is constant with the criteria set for by the Mn MUTCD.
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the city council approve the recommendation to install stop signs at the
intersection of Sandhurst Avenue and Kennard Street in order to sign the intersection as an all-way
stop.
Attachments:
1. Petition from 1627 Sandhurst Avenue
2. Proposed Stop Sign Location Map
3. October 25, 2011 S.E.H. Memo
Agenda Item G15
Packet Page Number 75 of 259
Agenda Item G15
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 76 of 259
Agenda Item G15 Attachment 1Packet Page Number 77 of 259
Agenda Item G15 Attachment 1Packet Page Number 78 of 259
DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and
data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only.
SOURCES: Ramsey County (September 30, 2011), The Lawrence Group;September 30, 2011 for County parcel and property records data; September 2011 for
Agenda Item G15
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 79 of 259
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196
SEH is an equal opportunity employer | www.sehinc.com | 651.490.2000 | 800.325.2055 | 888.908.8166 fax
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Love - City of Maplewood
FROM: Thomas A. Sohrweide, PE, PTOE
DATE: October 25, 2011
RE: Sandhurst Avenue/Kennard Street Intersection Control
SEH No. MAPLE 117779 Task 1.0
The City of Maplewood has received a petition for an all-way stop at the intersection of Sandhurst
Avenue/Kennard Street. The petition sites a recent vehicle crash at the intersection, cut-thru traffic, and
the proximity of Sherwood Park. The intersection is located in a residential area with 30 mph speed
limits and is currently uncontrolled.
At your request we have evaluated this intersection for the need of traffic control. This review included a
review of traffic count and vehicle speed data collected by City staff and a field review of the existing
conditions.
Criteria for the installation of intersection control are established by the Minnesota Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (Mn MUTCD). To justify an all-way stop requires that the main roadway has
300 vehicles per hour entering the intersection (total of both approaches) for 8 hours. In addition, there
must be a combined volume of at least 200 vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles per hour entering the
intersection (total for both approaches) for the same 8 hours, with an average delay of at least 30 seconds
per vehicle during the highest hour.
The traffic counts obtained by the City at this intersection indicate that there are 160 vehicles per day on
Kennard Street and 130 vehicles per day on Sandhurst Avenue. These volumes are totals in both
directions of travel and do not reach the thresholds necessary to justify an all-way stop.
Another justification for an all-way stop is 5 vehicle crashes in a 12 month period that are of the type
susceptible to correction with an all-way stop. According to Police records, the crash identified in the
petition is the only crash in the last 6 years at this intersection.
Traffic speed data was also collected by City staff on Kennard Street ½ block north of Sandhurst and at
Sherwood Park. The 85th percentile speed is that speed below which 85% of the traffic is traveling. This
speed is a significant input into determining appropriate speed limits. The results shown in the following
table are indicative of a local residential street.
Agenda Item G15
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 80 of 259
Sandhurst Avenue/Kennard Street Intersection Control
October 25, 2011
Page 2
Kennard Street
Vehicle Speeds (mph)
September 19 ‐ 21, 2011
Location Northbound Southbound
85th % Average 85th % Average
1/2 Block North
of Sandhurst 30 22 27 22
at Sherwood
Park 29 23 22 17
Field review of the intersection revealed sight restrictions on the northeast and southwest corners which
impact the speed at which drivers can safely access the intersection. The Mn MUTCD provides for the
use of engineering judgment in the case of restricted sight distance and the potential use of Stop control.
Under current conditions, a northbound driver could safely access the intersection at approximately 18
mph, southbound at 8 mph, eastbound at 12 mph, and a westbound driver would need to stop.
If the sight restrictions were improved through mediation efforts, the southbound movement could
improve to approximately 15 mph and the westbound to an estimated 10 mph.
Due to the relatively low safe approach speeds to access this intersection, with or without improved sight
distance, we recommend that stop signs be installed on Sandhurst Avenue at Kennard Street.
ts
s:\ko\m\maple\common\117779\love-sandhurst-kennard-study102511.docx
Agenda Item G15
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 81 of 259
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Packet Page Number 82 of 259
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, Dep. Director of Public Works / City Engineer
Steve Love, Assistant City Engineer
Jon Jarosch, Civil Engineer I
SUBJECT: 2012 Mill and Overlay Improvements, Project 11-15
a. Public Hearing
b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes)
DATE: November 8, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The public hearing for this project has been scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, November 14, 2011.
Notices of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The feasibility study was accepted by
the council on October 24, 2011, along with a resolution calling for a public hearing. The city council
will consider ordering the improvement following the public hearing.
BACKGROUND
It is important that the city maintains its infrastructure valued at roughly $200 million. The streets
associated with the 2012 Mill and Overlay project have continued to deteriorate over the years with the
streets having a current weighted average PCI rating of 63 (on a scale of 1 to 100) as indicated on the
approved 2012 -2016 CIP. The Public Works Department routinely fields calls from residents on the
current surface conditions of these roads. The maintenance staff spends a considerable amount of
time maintaining these streets by patching minimum depth surface failures, which are visually apparent
especially along Highwood and Linwood Avenues.
The streets associated with the proposed project can be seen on the attached project location maps
and are listed below:
Conway Avenue – (McKnight Road to Century Avenue)
Highwood Avenue – (McKnight Road to Farrell Street)
Linwood Avenue – (McKnight Road to Century Avenue)
Maryland Avenue – (McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive)
Roselawn Avenue – (Rice Street to Highway 61)
Stillwater Avenue – (McKnight Road to Lakewood Drive)
Southlawn Drive – (Beam Avenue to Legacy Parkway)
The feasibility report was ordered at the July 27, 2011 city council meeting. A letter and information
packet was mailed to residents and business owners on August 9, 2011 to provide information on the
council’s action and to notify them that preliminary engineering and site review would begin within the
subject areas. The informational packet contained a questionnaire, information about the proposed mill
and overlay project, a project location map, and a letter explaining assessments.
Informational neighborhood meetings were held September 19 and 20, 2011 at the Maplewood
Community Center. Staff mailed out the invitation to 324 property owners. Approximately 50 residents
Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 83 of 259
attended the September meetings. Meetings generally ran from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. including a
presentation, question and answer session, neighborhood brainstorming session, and one-on-one
conversations with city staff. Items presented at these meetings included the public improvement
process, an explanation of why these streets were chosen for improvements, project scope, proposed
assessments, and an estimated project timeline. Staff also solicited feedback from residents on other
issues that could potentially be addressed by this project. Staff has also met with project stakeholders
individually.
From discussion with the residents some of the concerns raised relate to the proposed assessments,
traffic speeds, and volume of bus/truck traffic. During the design phase of the project staff will review
traffic calming measures that were discussed at the neighborhood meeting, such as dynamic speed
signs, to determine if they can be incorporated into the project. A summary of the response to the
questionnaires sent to the residents on the project streets, along with a summary of written comments,
are attached to this report.
On October 24, 2011 staff presented the feasibility report to the city council. The council accepted the
report and called for a public hearing to be held on November 14, 2011. The feasibility report is
available on the city web site www.ci.maplewood.mn.us under the 2012 Mill and Overlays “Projects”
pull down tab. Copies for viewing are also available in the office of the City Engineer.
On October 27, 2011 a letter was mailed to all property owners abutting the proposed project streets
informing them of the time, location, and purpose of the public hearing. The letter also reiterated that
staff is available to meet and discuss questions or concerns prior to the public hearing. Project location
maps were also included in the letter outlining the proposed project streets. The information regarding
the public hearing is available under the 2012 Mill and Overlays “Projects” pull down tab.
DISCUSSION
According to the approved 2012 – 2016 CIP the proposed mill and overlay project was to be split over
the 2012 and 2013 construction seasons. However, due to the volume of complaints on the subject
roadways and in the interest of creating efficiencies and cost savings by minimizing administrative
costs, it has been proposed to construct all of the improvements in 2012.
The main focus of the proposed project is the rehabilitation of the pavement surface. Staff is
proposing to remove the top 2 inches of existing bituminous by milling (i.e. grinding) and thereby
removing the damaged surface. Following the milling operation the milled pavement surface will be
inspected for sub-grade failures and additional corrective measures will be applied as necessary.
With the goal of the project being pavement rehabilitation there are no major utility upgrades
proposed as part of this project. Minor upgrades associated with this project include the replacement
of outdated sanitary sewer castings with castings meeting currents city standards and replacement of
damaged storm sewer castings. Prior to the placement of the new bituminous overlay all castings will
be adjusted to their appropriate heights.
For those streets with existing concrete curb and gutter it is proposed to remove and replace
damaged or broken panels prior to the placement of the new bituminous overlay. It is estimated that
approximately 10% of the existing concrete curb and gutter will need to be replaced. Staff also
recommends replacing all bituminous curb on the project streets as milling along the base of the curb
can further damage the curb and would result in a seam in the bituminous near the base of the curb.
Curbing is often used to contain and help transport storm-water runoff. Having a seam where the
water is concentrated increases the risks of degradation to the roadway.
Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 84 of 259
Existing pedestrian curb ramps will be reviewed and evaluated to ensure they meet current ADA
requirements. The final steps of the project will be the placement of a new 2-inch bituminous overlay
and the restriping of the road way. The project street widths range from 30 to 44 feet wide and are
proposed to remain the same however striping could be adjusted to narrow lane widths.
ASSESSMENTS
An independent appraisal firm was hired to ascertain an opinion of special benefit received by
properties within the neighborhood project area. This information was used to set the proposed special
benefit assessment amounts for the project area. There are 178 assessable residential parcels and 30
assessable commercial parcels within the project area.
Based on the City of Maplewood’s Pavement Management Policy, residential parcels are assessed on
an equal “unit” basis. The City’s current residential unit assessment rate for a mill and overlay is
$2,450. However, per Minnesota State Statute 429, the assessment amount cannot be greater than the
benefit received by the property from the improvement. Therefore, an appraisal firm was consulted to
determine the benefit that would be realized from the proposed mill and overlay project. According to
the appraisal report, the residential assessment rates needed to be reduced from the current rate. The
project assessment “unit” rates have been set based on the special benefit appraisal as follows:
Residential
o Mill & Overlay Rate = $2,000/unit
Commercial
o Commercial Special Benefit Assessment Rates = Per Linear Foot Basis
Commercial properties assessment rates per linear foot basis based upon
special benefit appraisals
BUDGET
The total project budget approved at the October 24, 2011 city council meeting is $3,194,800. A
portion of the improvements are proposed to be financed through a combination of special benefit
assessments, consistent with the City’s assessment policy, in addition to potential 3M TIF Funds. If the
3M TIF funding is not available, the remaining project costs would be recovered by increasing the
M.S.A. bonding. It is important to note that this funding plan does not utilize general tax levy dollars.
The remaining funding sources include a combination of E.U.F., W.A.C., and Sanitary Sewer funds.
The following is a summary of the estimated financing for the proposed project:
FUNDING SOURCE
TOTAL
AMOUNT
% OF TOTAL
PROJECT
M.S.A. BONDS $1,266,400 40%
SANITARY SEWER FUND $59,900 2%
ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITY FUND $46,200 1%
SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT $1,146,000 36%
W.A.C. FUND $26,300 1%
3M TAX INCREMENT FINANCING $650,000 20%
TOTAL FUNDING $3,194,800 100%
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST RECOVERY
Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 85 of 259
Even though this project does not utilize general tax levy money, the intent is to design this project with
a number of bid alternate options. This would allow the City to reduce the scope of improvements by
eliminating bid alternates if necessary. In essence, this would allow the bids to be received and the city
can choose the project scope based on the cost it is comfortable with in order to proceed.
CONCLUSION
With the majority of the streets associated with the proposed project classified as major collectors the
proposed improvements are necessary to maintain these vital links of the city’s infrastructure. The
proposed improvements main focus is to rehabilitate the pavement surface condition of the project
streets. The proposed improvements will reduce the costs and time spent by maintenance staff each
year patching minimum depth surface failures and will provide an acceptable driving surface for users.
The majority of the residential properties benefiting from the proposed improvements will be assessed a
total of $2,000. This amount can be paid over 8 years on the taxes at an interest rate estimated at 6%.
Assessment deferment options are available for those citizens meeting age or disability and income
requirements where the assessment would cause financial hardship. Additionally, deferments are
available to National Guard or other military reserves called into active service and undeveloped
properties. If the project is ordered to proceed the staff would work with those individuals to file an
assessment objection prior to the Assessment Hearing to be held at a later date next year.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the improvement for
the 2012 Mill and Overlays, City Project 11-15. (Four affirmative votes are required to approve this
resolution).
Attachments:
1. Resolution Ordering Improvement
2. Feasibility Report – Executive Summary
3. Questionnaire Results
4. Location Map
Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 86 of 259
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 24th day of October 2011, fixed a date
for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the 2012 Mill and Overlays, City Project
11-15.
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was
given, and the hearing was duly held on November 14, 2011, and the council has heard all persons
desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost-effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that
the City of Maplewood make improvements to the 2012 Mill and Overlays, City Project 11-15.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the
14th day of November, 2011.
3. The city engineer or his designee is the engineer for this improvement and is hereby
directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement.
4. The finance director was authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to
implement the financing plan for the project by the city council at the October 24, 2011 council meeting.
A project budget of $3,194,800 was established. The approved financing plan is as follows:
FUNDING SOURCE
TOTAL
AMOUNT
% OF TOTAL
PROJECT
M.S.A. BONDS $1,266,400 40%
SANITARY SEWER FUND $59,900 2%
ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITY FUND $46,200 1%
SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT $1,146,000 36%
W.A.C. FUND $26,300 1%
3M TAX INCREMENT FINANCING $650,000 20%
TOTAL FUNDING $3,194,800 100%
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST RECOVERY
Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 87 of 259
FEASIBILITY REPORT
2012 MILL AND OVERLAYS
CITY PROJECT 11-15
CONWAY AVENUE, HIGHWOOD AVENUE, LINWOOD AVENUE, MARYLAND AVENUE, ROSELAWN
AVENUE, SOUTHLAWN DRIVE, STILLWATER AVENUE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project Summary
This feasibility report has been prepared for the 2012 Mill and Overlays, City of Maplewood Project 11-
15. The above referenced streets total approximately 5.7 miles in length. The proposed improvements
include the following:
1) A 2” mill and overlay of all project streets. Sub-grade repairs would be performed in areas of
failure as necessary to support the overlay.
2) Removal and replacement of damaged sections of concrete curb and gutter.
3) Removal and replacement of all bituminous curbing.
4) Replacement of outdated sanitary sewer castings.
5) Replacement of damaged storm sewer castings.
6) Replacement of pedestrian curb ramps as necessary.
7) Consider the installation of traffic control measures such as dynamic speed display signs and
stop signs.
8) Consider the installation of additional street lighting.
9) Consider the extension of water and sewer service to properties at the east end of Linwood
Avenue.
Project Cost
The estimated project cost is $3,194,800 and is outlined as follows:
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL
AMOUNT
% OF TOTAL
PROJECT
STREET IMPROVEMENTS 3,062,400.00$ 95.9%
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 46,200.00$ 1.4%
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVMENTS 59,900.00$ 1.9%
WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 26,300.00$ 0.8%
TOTAL ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COSTS $3,194,800 100%
The estimated costs includes 8% contingencies and 15% overhead, which include engineering,
administrative, legal, and fiscal expenses.
Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 88 of 259
Proposed Financing
The improvements are proposed to be financed through a combination of special assessments to the
benefiting properties, Municipal State Aid Bonds (M.S.A.), Sanitary Sewer Fund, Environmental Utility
Fund, W.A.C. and potential 3M TIF funds. The following is a summary of the estimated financing for
the proposed project.
Schedule
The following schedule may be implemented, should it be determined to proceed with the project:
Receive feasibility study 10/24/2011
Order public hearing 10/24/2011
Public hearing 11/14/2011
Authorize preparation of plans and specifications 11/14/2011
Approve plans and specifications/Authorize advertisement for bids 2/13/2012
Bid date 3/30/2012
Assessment hearing 4/9/2012
Accept bids/award contract 4/9/2012
Begin construction May 2012
Complete construction September 2012
Assessments certified to Ramsey County November 2012
Photo of distresses on Linwood Avenue
FUNDING SOURCE
TOTAL
AMOUNT
% OF TOTAL
PROJECT
M.S.A. BONDS $1,266,400 40%
SANITARY SEWER FUND $59,900 2%
ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITY FUND $46,200 1%
SPECIAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT $1,146,000 36%
W.A.C. FUND $26,300 1%
3M TAX INCREMENT FINANCING $650,000 20%
TOTAL FUNDING $3,194,800 100%
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST RECOVERY
Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 89 of 259
2012 Mill and Overlays, Project 11-15Questionnaire ResultsProj. StreetStreetPrivate UtilitiesTypeAccess NeedsTypeDrainage IssueGeneral CommentsConway Conway Avenue nonenoneAre they going to have turn off our utilities on the frontage road. Conway Conway Avenue nonenonenoneConway Conway Avenue NoneNoneOn street ponding at end of driveway and in front of mailboxConway Conway AvenueConway Conway Avenue nonenonenoneConway Conway Avenue OtherUtilities should be below grade far enough as not to interfere with Road Work. Contact S. Maleitzke with questions.Highwood Beth CourtWhy? The road surface west of Dahl is in good condition and has a low traffic count. Highwood Crestview Dr. nonemedical Chemo TreatmentsHighwood Farrell St.OtherHave new development at Farrell St. S. And have to make sure we have access for our model home. Just as noted above that the entrance to Farrell is not blocked by trucks and that Highwood is open to Century. Highwood Ferndale St. Sprinkler System, Invisible FenceHighwood Ferndale St. nonenonenoHighwood Highwood Ave.other school transportationPlease work closely with us to determine if we need to move student bus stops.Highwood Highwood Ave. nonenoneno drainage issuesHighwood Highwood Ave. sprinkler systemAre you also putting curbs in?Highwood Highwood Ave.This should be taken out of the State and City taxes which we already paid for street repair.Highwood Highwood Ave.I am not in favor of this project. It is unnecessary, and I cannot afford the assessment. I am unemployed and have no money in which to pay it. Highwood Highwood Ave. nonenoneThe way the economy is today it's really unreasonable to expect people to pay $2500 for a road that was improved not that long ago. Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 90 of 259
2012 Mill and Overlays, Project 11-15Questionnaire ResultsProj. StreetStreetPrivate UtilitiesTypeAccess NeedsTypeDrainage IssueGeneral CommentsHighwood Highwood Ave.Medical, handicappedwife has handicap, strokeHow dare you since the worst economic times since the great depression you charge $2500 for a street that is very serviceable. What about the people that are in the culdesacs that use the street as their main outlet. You are leaving this cost to a few residents to pay for (not charging homeowners that do not have a driveway but have property on it) an unnecessary improvement with main outlet. This was NOT thought out at all!! The curbs on this street are fine. There is no reason for you to spend the few homeowners money for the cost of something that is not necessary! Why are you not charging by the foot? Homeowners are barely hanging on to their homes and you want to add extra that they cannot afford. Charge everyone not just a few if this is necessary, which it is not! The new developments made this worse. Why are they not paying?!?Highwood Highwood Ave. nonenoHighwood Highwood Ave.I believe only utilities, gas, electric, cable tv, for public use in street. I have gas an water to my house/cable tv overhead.nonenoneVery expensive! I can't afford it!Highwood Highwood Ave. nonejust be able to get one of us out for work each day. There is a ridge in front of our driveway to keep rain water from running into our driveway and creating wash outs on the side of our house. During the last full road construction project (1998) we were having house remodeling done and the city said they would be back to finish but they never showed up. I finally had to call to get someone out to look at how badly our side yard was being damaged by the street runoff which is when the ridge was placed. Please be aware of that. Please have an assessment hearing in the south end of Maplewood as there are many of us that live south of I-94. Highwood Highwood Ave. NANAWe currently have a small curb lip on the front of the driveway as w/o it all the street run off drains down driveway. Please replace. The speed on Highwood is currently 30 mph. However, during peak times (early morning/evening) they increase dramatically. Could we get a stop sign somewhere to slow vehicles as with new pavement they will only increase? Or could we receive additional patrols after work completed. Highwood Highwood Ave.Please consider widening the street or adding sidewalk. There is a substantial pedestrian and bike use. Speed bumps needed. The road is very straight and only the current rough condition slows the traffic to a safe level. HIghwood Highwood Ave. nonenoneI was wondering if power lines will be buried with this project?Highwood Highwood Ave.home businessHighwood Highwood Ave. nonenonenoneHighwood Highwood Ave. irrigation system
Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 91 of 259
2012 Mill and Overlays, Project 11-15Questionnaire ResultsProj. StreetStreetPrivate UtilitiesTypeAccess NeedsTypeDrainage IssueGeneral CommentsHighwood Highwood Ave.Sprinkler systemI see someone was smart enough to put a return name and address on the info letter. Duh!Highwood Highwood Ave. invisible fence graduation party Highwood Highwood Ave.I was under the impression that Highwood Ave. was a county road and wouldn't be charged for improvements when I bought my home - 1971 or so. Highwood Highwood Ave. OtherLamp post wiring from lamp post to driveway for future light projectAre sidewalks or walkways in the plan for Highwood?Highwood Marnie St. nonenoneNoneHighwood McClelland St.handicapped handicapped childHighwood McClelland St. noneN/AHighwood Red Pine Circle nonenonenoneHighwood Schaller Dr.medical, handicappedI am very much opposed to the project as I stated in my previous correspondence. Linwood Beth CourtThe need is not apparent.Linwood Dahl Ave. N/AHome businessWe just need to get to our house. No.It really needs this work. Thank you!Linwood Dahl Ave.graduation partyLinwood Farrell St.OtherMy new development has a model home that is open Thurs. - Sun.I would like to discuss access to my development, Cardinal Cottagewood.Linwood Linwood Ave.not at this timeStorm sewer located at corner of McKnight and Linwood, overflow runs into yard and boulevard.Linwood Linwood Ave.Not convinced we need concrete curbs, etc. Will encourage traffic. Do not want to pay extra so others in neighborhood or outsidee of neighborhood would benefit. Linwood already is a route for Woodbury people - do not want to foster this. Linwood Linwood Ave.Linwood has become a main thoroughfare for Woodbury residents and others to get to McKnight. Heavy traffic of cars and trucks with nobody enforcing the speed limit and axle weights. With the land development in the area, has increased the traffic. Why should the people who live on Linwood have to pay for others that tear up the street. Linwood was re-surfaced less than 8 years ago, why does it need to be done again? Probably because of such high flow of traffic. Again, this should not be the responsibility of the Linwood residents to pay. Our property taxes have increased sustantially, the city needs to figure out how to allocate monies so that we don't have to pay extra to fix Linwood Avenue. Linwood Linwood Ave.Linwood Linwood Ave. nonenonenoneNot good timing with the current economy. Street was very poor when we moved here in 1986. No gutters & broken blacktop. Actually conditions now are a big improvement. Family up the street washes garden produce for sale which is eroding the gutters on our hill to the street drain. Otherwise no problems. Really thinking this project is not critical at this time. Possibly in 4 to 5 years. Linwood Linwood Ave. nonenoneAgenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 92 of 259
2012 Mill and Overlays, Project 11-15Questionnaire ResultsProj. StreetStreetPrivate UtilitiesTypeAccess NeedsTypeDrainage IssueGeneral CommentsLinwood Linwood Ave. nonenonenoneConcerns with our responsibility to pay for it and how our family will be able to afford it.Linwood Linwood Ave. nonenoCity and/or contractor employees have permission to access 2425 Linwood Ave. E property as necessary to accomplish their jobs. Linwood Linwood Ave. nonenonenoneI believe the costs should be assessed on a "per frontage foot" basis instead of a "by the lot" basis. Linwood Linwood Ave. nonenoneThis is the 4th time in 25 years I've been assessed. The burden on budget is extreme. Linwood Linwood Ave. drain tile systemfollows east side of driveway almost to curbhome businesspiano students during afternoon/evening hours MTWTLinwood Linwood Ave. irrigation systemHandicappedJeffrey Battey is in a wheelchair, picked up M-F by large bus going to training center in St. Paul (8:45 - 3:45)For retired people this is a big extra burden. Property taxes are 9% over last year, $2660 on my 1300 sq foot househouse making a total of $5000+ for the year. At my age (83) deferred payment doesn't make sense. I think the pain should be spread. People living on Linwood Ct., Dahl, Plano, police firing range, golf course, etc. use Linwood more than I do. The cul de sacs all use Linwood as their access. Many cars use our street as an entrance to the freeway. Linwood Linwood Ave. nonenonenoneNothing says "Welcome to Maplewood!" to a brand new homeowner like an assessment! It is NOT needed, Linwood is perfectly serviceable. All making that road smooth as glass will do is encourage more people to blow the stop sign at Linwood & Sterling. When someone gets hurt or injured at that intersection I will be at the council meeting to make this point again. There are plenty of crappy streets in Maplewood. Why re-do this one that doesn't need it? I work from home, I don't want the hassle, cost or increased traffic this proposal will bring. Find a better spot that needs this to spend mine and city funds. Please reconsider this unneccessary project and don't make us sorry we chose Maplewood to live.Linwood Linwood Ave.2578-2588-2596 Linwood was completely redone for new Sanitary Sewer and Water 2008Linwood Linwood Ave.I choose not to respond or cooperate. What is being proposed is grossly unfair to Linwood property owners. I choose not to respond or cooperate. What is being proposed is grossly unfair to Linwood property owners. Linwood is no longer a residential street or even a neighborhood feeder street. With the completion of the Lake Road Access from Woodbury and the varience granted New Century to vacate an East-West feeder, Linwood has become a major thoroughfare. It would be criminal to assess Linwood residents for an improvement to assess Linwood residents for an improvement that increases the traffic on Linwood by non-Linwood residents.Linwood Linwood Ave.If the plan is to assess only the residents with properties abutting Linwood, I chose not to repond or cooperate. If the plan is to assess only the residents with properties abutting Linwood, I chose not to repond or cooperate. The city is responsible for making Linwood a thoroughfare. It is not a residential street.Linwood Linwood Ave.home businessAgenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 93 of 259
2012 Mill and Overlays, Project 11-15Questionnaire ResultsProj. StreetStreetPrivate UtilitiesTypeAccess NeedsTypeDrainage IssueGeneral CommentsLinwood Linwood Ave. Othercomcast cablenonenoneIt would be really nice to know what you are proposing to do on Linwood and know why we are being assessed for it when we haven't been in over 21 + years we have lived here.Linwood Linwood Ave. drain tile systemunder driveway to drain the ditch near the streetI do not want the end of my cement driveway disturbed during this project. Last time the street was resurfaced part of the cement driveway was removed which was completely unnecessary and it was not replaced with cement I do not want that to happen this time. Linwood Linwood Ave.medical, handicappedKeep 24 hour access to residence during construction. Linwood Linwood Ave. In 2009 sewer and water were installed on our property. As part of this project, the street in front of our house (and 2 adjoining properties) was taken down to the road bed and rebuilt. All properties were assessed and 12 years remain on this assessment. We feel that, according to your paper work properties that have previously been assessed for major street reconstruction will not be assessed for 35 years. Our property definitely falls into this category. Linwood Linwood Ave. E. sprinkler systemThe area immediately in front of our propertywas redone within the last 5 years. Will this be included in the project. If not, can we avoid the assessment on our property?Linwood Linwood Avenue noneIf you could lower the catch basin in front of our house the birdbath in my driveway would be eliminated. I support the project - especially if you could lower our catch basin a ring or two. Thanks.Linwood Linwood Ct.Concerned if school bus will have access to Linwood Ct. during construction.Linwood Linwood Ct. NANAdon't knowLinwood Linwood Ct. nonenoneLinwood Linwood Ct. nonenoneLong overdue. Linwood Linwood Ct. nonenonenoneGreat idea, long overdue.Linwood Sterling St. drain tile systemunderground drain tile to 10' from streetnonenoneMaryland Maryland Ave. nonenonenoneMaryland Maryland Ave. nonenonenoMaryland Maryland Ave.Maryland Maryland Ave.Medical, handicappedWe are handicapped.Maryland Maryland Ave.All the rain water from 150' runs into our driveway. Fill it with water.Maryland Maryland Ave. noneGraduation Party, Home businessMaryland Maryland Ave. nonenoneMaryland Maryland Ave. nonenoneWater ponds on the foot of my driveway.Maryland Maryland Ave.home businessI have 2 driveways, I need access to home & garage. The neighborhood people are all low income. Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 94 of 259
2012 Mill and Overlays, Project 11-15Questionnaire ResultsProj. StreetStreetPrivate UtilitiesTypeAccess NeedsTypeDrainage IssueGeneral CommentsMaryland Maryland Ave. OtherDriveway has heated coils that run to the street. HandicappedGroup home withindividuals with wheelchairs. Group home. Need safe place to transfer people in wheelchairs from bus to house. Maryland Maryland Ave. otherdriveway heated, (coils to end of driveway)Handicappedgroup home with people in wheelchairs - need safe place to transfer people from bus to Maryland Maryland Ave. sprinkler system on my side of the curbThe house at 2355 Maryland has a heated driveway - when it snows the water flows down the driveway into the street and down the hill (east toward my house) makes it down just far enough for the plow to fill my driveway with slush. A drain at 2355 Maryland I think is in order. Would like to see the "pork chop" removed at the corner of Lake wood & Maryland - it would help to slow traffic down going west on Maryland. This property (NW corner of Lakewood and Maryland) was assessed whenMaryland had curbs put in going west for approx. 250 west, at that point the curbing stops. Roselawn Adolphus St.Medical and HandicappedThank you. Roselawn Adolphus St. NA NA NoneI am totally confused. We've already been assessed for the Western Hills Project. Is this a separate project?Roselawn Adolphus St.We have a chain link fence around our yard. Our only exit & access is roselawn Ave. We have not other way to get out of our property. Corner Lot. Roselawn Arcade St. Roselawn Arcade St. none noneBad storm drain pipe that crosses from Roselawn to Arcade St. Roselawn Arcade St. Roselawn is a major artery between 61 and 35E, it is not a private residential street. I do not believe those of us w/houses on Roselawn should pay an additional assessment to subsidize what should be a project completely funded by the City of Maplewood. Roselawn Edgerton St. otherdriveway should be useable during memorial day weekendRoselawn Edgerton St. none Home BusinessWork at home office that needs phone/landline and cable/internet access uninterrupted.Our corner. SW corner of Edgerton & Roselawn is a "gathering" place for sewer/waste water from nursing home, school, etc.Having electrical power, cable/internet and phone/landline are of utmost importance for home business. More so than coming and going from driveway even. Thank you!Roselawn Edgerton St. OtherSchool is out on June 8, 2012. Summer school likely starts June 26th. It would be good if the Roselawn major work could be done in this window of time. Roselawn Jackson St. none none noneRoselawn Rice business business access David Parupsky is property owner. Carhop leases the business.
Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 95 of 259
2012 Mill and Overlays, Project 11-15Questionnaire ResultsProj. StreetStreetPrivate UtilitiesTypeAccess NeedsTypeDrainage IssueGeneral CommentsRoselawn Rice businessI do not believe that the project needs to be done on Roselawn ave. Roselawn is in good shape and does not need to be repaved. The project would be an unnecessary expense to the landowners on Roselawn. Please send me the list of other homeowners on Roselawn Ave. who received this notice. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonemedicalBoyfriend is 90% disabled veteran. Can we make the road a non-trucking route? They are ruining the road I am going to have to pay for. They should have to take Hwy. 36. These roads are not meant for the heavy semi tankers. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonemedical, handicappedBoyfriend is 90 % disabled and lives there too. We are concerned about semi trucks and other large turcks. They have ruined the road already. Can we make it a non-truck route? And are the businesses these trucks are from going to help pay to fix the damage they have caused. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenonenoneRoselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenonenoneRoselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenoneNoneRoselawn Roselawn Ave. noneSeems expensive for just a recover job. Seal coating is a good alternative. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenoneIs questioning the competency of staff because of sending out 2 questionnaires. Roselawn Roselawn Ave.Roselawn Roselawn Ave.Our driveway is on Jackson St. We have already paid for the road on Roselawn approx. 22 years ago. Are you going to charge Centerline Bus or Schroeder Milk or the St. Paul Water Utilities? Milk Co. uses Roselawn 24/7 365 days per yr. We were told when there was a traffic study going on that large trucks could not be run near schools and daycares where children are present. Is it true?Roselawn Roselawn Ave.handicapped Elderly person at homeSee Attached. Roselawn Roselawn Ave.Roselawn Roselawn Ave.I am concerned that the truck traffic will again damage the road prematurely. I detest being assessed for the work that is necessarry due to the great number of heavy trucks using this road. Roselawn Roselawn Ave.home daycareRoselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenonenoneRoselawn Roselawn Ave. noneI'm 93 years old. Who knows?Unless this street is declared residential I see no need for this project as the trucks will have it wrecked in a year. Why should we improve the road for the trucking end. Also if this project does not install curbing forget it. Right now I have no curbing. Roselawn Roselawn Ave.mailboxMedical ?Poor drainage. Everything ends up at the end of driveway. If this is a county road then the county should be responsible for it. If it is a city street then all semi trucks and busses should be banned from it. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenoneI think this is a good idea. It should help reduce street noise due to trucks and busses going over cracks and bumps. Roselawn is heavily used by bicyclists and pedestrians. The project will improve the road for them and increase the aesthetics of the street,Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenonenoneAgenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 96 of 259
2012 Mill and Overlays, Project 11-15Questionnaire ResultsProj. StreetStreetPrivate UtilitiesTypeAccess NeedsTypeDrainage IssueGeneral CommentsRoselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenoneEver since the street was repaved last time - we always have a large puddle at the bottom of the driveway 8 - 10' long. The front yard slopes after the re-paving also - collecting rain water across the bottom of the front yad by the street. Hopefully we will be able to be notified when we cannot get into our driveway? We live in the middle of the block and would be a long walk w/groceries. Roselawn Roselawn Ave.There is severe puddling/pooling at the end of our driveway.We have major water pressure issues. So if there will be access to the water pipe, our pressure could us to be turned up.Roselawn Roselawn Ave.Last project was over 2 inches too high. Resulting in water collecting at bottom of his and neighbor's driveways. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. sprinkler systemnonenoneRoselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenoneWe have a drainage problem in the spring in our back driveway, not Roselawn. Roselawn Roselawn Ave.Roselawn Roselawn Ave.Sprinkler system, other4 signs and sprinkler systemnonenoneRoselawn Roselawn Ave.medicalWe are expecting a baby at the end of the March. I am going to be on maternity leave next spring/summer. With a new baby, we are going to need unrestricted access to our driveway. I am also going to need quiet and peace for recovery/maternity leave. Construction such as this tends to be extremely smelly and loud. I am particularly sensitive to such smells and would prefer to not have them during the time that I am home full-time with the baby. Roselawn Roselawn Ave.medicalNeed access to Roselawn due to bad legs. Need use of driveway.Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenonenoneRoselawn Roselawn Ave.handicappedMetro Mobility services 4 days a week - don't want any road improvements to interfere with their ability to pick up disabled son Curb at top of driveway to keep water from running down and into garage. Why are we being assessed? Roselawn is a county road and building/improvement projects for the past 25 years have been paid for by the county. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. sprinkler system Medical, handicappedHealth care facility - staff and guests come and go most of the day as well as emergency vehicles and Not aware of any.Roselawn Roselawn Ave.Roselawn Roselawn Ave.would like to know when this starts.Roselawn Roselawn Ave. OtherNot near Roselawn Ave. but we have an antenna wire buried between satellite dish and house.We do not have a driveway on Roselawn. Our driveway is on Lee St.Roselawn is in bad shape in many areas and does not yet have curbs in our area. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. NANANAPlease continue to mail correspondence to 2074 Edgerton.Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 97 of 259
2012 Mill and Overlays, Project 11-15Questionnaire ResultsProj. StreetStreetPrivate UtilitiesTypeAccess NeedsTypeDrainage IssueGeneral CommentsRoselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenonenoneRoselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenonenoneWe are concerned at having to pay the assessment fee given we may move in summer 2012 and not even enjoy the road we've paid for. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenoneFearful it will increase traffic on Roselawn- worse than it already is. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenoneWould it be possible to fill in the ditch on N side of Roselawn between E and W Kenwood Drives. Would like slope to be 1/2 or less than it is now. Roselawn Roselawn Ave. nonenonenoneRoselawn Roselawn Ave.Drainage ditch - can this be changed, partially or completely filledRoselawn Roselawn Ave.Keep busses off of Roselawn!Roselawn Roselawn Ave.OtherCamper in driveway. Need access most weekends May - Oct. Roselawn Roselawn Ave.nononeRoselawn Roselawn Ave.Roselawnsprinkler system, private wiringwe have building signage that could be damaged during road work, please use care. Stillwater Lakewood Dr. nonegraduation partyStillwater Stillwater Ave. OtherService on Sundays, Preschool Sept - May no busesWe have concerns regarding drainage issues that will need to be addressed. Stillwater Stillwater Ave. noneOtherSunday Services & Preschool access m-f no bussesRun off from Stillwater Rd. into our parking lot must be corrected. Access from Stillwater Rd. into our parking lot. Stillwater Stillwater Ave. nonenoincluded a diagram and picturesStillwater Stillwater Ave. Street really needs the repair!Stillwater Stillwater Ave. nonenonenoneI'm wondering why residents are paying for this when a majority of the wear and tear on the street is due to transit busses, semi's, and other vehicles just passing through. Agenda Item H1
Packet Page Number 98 of 259
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 99 of 259
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 100 of 259
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, City Engineer/Dep. Public Works Director
Alan Kantrud, City Attorney
SUBJECT: HHoolllloowwaayy aanndd SSttaanniicchh HHiigghhllaannddss AArreeaa IImmpprroovveemmeennttss,, PPrroojjeecctt 0099--1133
aa.. RReeaasssseessssmmeenntt HHeeaarriinngg
bb.. RReessoolluuttiioonn AAddooppttiinngg AAsssseessssmmeenntt RRoollll
DATE: November 8, 2011
INTRODUCTION
All three property owners have been mailed a notice of the exact amount of their reassessment, as well
as notice that they must submit a written objection either at or prior to the hearing if they disagree with
the reassessment amount.
The city council should conduct the assessment hearing, receive any objections, and refer those
objections to the staff for action at the November 28, 2011 council meeting. The council will consider
approving the attached resolution adopting the assessment roll except for those property owners who
have submitted objections.
BACKGROUND
This project involved the full street reconstruction (sub grade corrections, new aggregate base, new
concrete curb and gutter where none existed before, and new bituminous pavement) of Holloway
Avenue and streets in the Stanich Highlands Area (location map attached). The work also included the
installation of new storm sewer and replacement of water main. Sanitary sewer main repairs and storm
water treatment in the neighborhood are also included in the scope of the project.
The Maplewood City Council ordered the preparation of the feasibility study at the June 1, 2009
meeting. On June 22, 2009, the city council accepted the feasibility report, ordered the public hearing,
ordered the project, and authorized preparation of plans and specifications. The public hearing notice
was published twice and notice was sent to the property owners. The public hearing was conducted at
the July 13, 2009 council meeting. On July 27, 2009, the city council approved the plans, authorized to
advertise for bids, and ordered the preparation of the assessment roll. Bids were opened on
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 with Assessment Hearing and Adoption of the Assessment Roll on
September 28, 2009. Construction started in summer of 2009 with construction finalized in 2010.
During the assessment hearing process back in 2009, three property owners objected (1929 Kingston
Ave E, 1930 Kingston Ave E, and 1935 Kingston Ave E) and appealed to Ramsey County District
Court. The order for judgment was the reassessment as provided in Minn. Stat. 429.071. Accordingly
the City is reassessing subject parcels and the City Council adopted a resolution on October 10, 2011
that accepted the assessment roll and called for an assessment hearing to be held on November 14,
2011 for purposes of reassessment.
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 101 of 259
ASSESSMENT DISCUSSION
As mentioned above the City is reassessing as a result of the order for judgment which called for the
reassessment as provided in Minn. Stat. 429.071. The following is the specific language from that
Statute:
429.071 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS; REASSESSMENT.
Subd. 2.Reassessment.
When an assessment is, for any reason whatever, set aside by a court of
competent jurisdiction as to any parcel or parcels of land, or in event the council
finds that the assessment or any part thereof is excessive or determines on advice
of the municipal attorney that the assessment or proposed assessment or any part
thereof is or may be invalid for any reason, the council may, upon notice and
hearing as provided for the original assessment, make a reassessment or a new
assessment as to such parcel or parcels.
Accordingly, the City is conducting this reassessment hearing on November 14, 2011 to make
reassessment against the three subject parcels. In advance of this process an independent appraiser
was hired to conduct a Special Benefits Appraisal for each of the three residential properties. The City
received the appraisal documents on August 31, 2011.
It should be noted that the proposed assessment against each parcel is $6,990 which is lower than the
finding of special benefit for each parcel; which was found to be $7,900. By keeping the proposed
reassessment amount at $6,990 it maintains consistency with similar assessments in this neighborhood
for single family residential properties receiving a full street reconstruction with new storm sewer
infrastructure. The proposed assessment of $6,990 also conforms to the City’s assessment policy,
which states that the lower amount of the set rate or the special benefit shall be used. This ensures
that the proposed assessment does not exceed the special benefit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached Resolution for the Adoption of the
Assessment Roll for 1929 Kingston Ave E, 1930 Kingston Ave E, and 1935 Kingston Ave E, for the
Holloway Avenue and Stanich Highlands Area Improvements, City Project 09-13.
Attachments:
1. Resolution: Adopting Assessment Roll
2. Assessment Roll
3. Location Map
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 102 of 259
RESOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 10, 2011, calling
for a Public Hearing for purposes of Reassessment, the assessment roll for the Holloway Avenue and
Stanich Highlands Area Improvements, City Project 09-13, was presented in a Public Hearing format,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, the following property owners have filed objections to their assessments according
to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows:
a) None to date.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review the objections received
and report to the City Council at the regular meeting on November 28, 2011 as to their
recommendations for adjustments.
2. The assessment roll for the Holloway Avenue and Stanich Highlands Area Improvements as
amended, without those property owners’ assessments that have filed objections, a copy of
which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted. Said assessment roll shall
constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land
therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of
the assessment levied against it.
3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15
years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2012 and
shall bear interest at the rate of 5.4 percent per annum. To the first installment shall be added
interest on the entire assessment from November 14, 2011 until December 31, 2011. To each
subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments.
4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
reassessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the reassessment on such property, with
interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Maplewood, except that no interest shall
be charged if the entire reassessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
reassessment. Owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City of Maplewood the entire
amount of the reassessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 15 or
interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year.
5. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after December 14, 2011 but no later than
December 15, 2011 transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be
extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid
over the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the council on this 14th day of November 2011.
Agenda Item H2
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 103 of 259
Holloway Avenue and Stanich Highlands Area Improvements City Project 09‐13Re‐assessmentPARCEL IDOWNERSTREET NUMBERSTREETSTORM ASSESSMENTSTREET ASSESSMENTTOTAL ASSESSMENT142922340034 PAUL W BERGLUND1929 KINGSTON AVE E$990.00 $6,000.00 $6,990.00142922340041 KATHLEEN SUSAN HALEY1930 KINGSTON AVE E$990.00 $6,000.00 $6,990.00142922340033 MARGARET ELLEN HAGGERTY 1935 KINGSTON AVE E$990.00 $6,000.00 $6,990.00STORM ASSESSMENTSTREET ASSESSMENTTOTAL ASSESSMENT TOTALS = $2,970.00 $18,000.00$20,970.00Agenda Item H2
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 104 of 259
Agenda Item H2
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 105 of 259
MEMORANDUM
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment of Section 2-41 which gives the City Council
Authority to Consider Variances from the Zoning Code (first reading)
VOTE: Simple Majority Vote Required to Approve
DATE: November 7, 2011
INTRODUCTION
On May 6, 2011, the revised variance legislation took effect, which gives municipalities
the authority and guidelines for granting variances from the provisions of the city
ordinance.
Staff will be presenting various ordinance amendments to the planning commission and
city council where the existing ordinance language no longer addresses the revised
variance legislation as established by the State Legislature.
BACKGROUND
Reason for the Statutory Change
In 2008, the City of Minnetonka issued a variance to a residential property owner
permitting the expansion of a legal, non-conforming garage. The city, relying on a 1989
Court of Appeals decision, concluded that the grant of a variance was reasonable. The
city’s decision was challenged by an adjacent property owner. Both the District Court
and the Minnesota Court of Appeals agreed that the city’s decision was appropriate. On
June 24, 2010, the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and found
the city’s decision impermissible.
The Supreme Court examined the statutory definition of “undue hardship” in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462.357, and concluded that a city’s authority to issue a variance is
limited to those very rare cases where the property cannot be put to “a reasonable use”
without the variance. This establishes a high threshold for both the city and the property
owner when considering variance requests.
The Supreme Court reviewed the parallel county variance authority language that allows
for variances in situations of “practical difficulties” or “hardship.” The Supreme Court
found that the city authority was more limited because it did not contain the “practical
difficulties” provision. The court explicitly recognized that it was changing a longstanding
standard that cities have relied on in considering variance requests. In particular, the
court specifically rejected a 1989 Court of Appeals interpretation of the phrase “undue
hardship,” which allowed for the grant of a variance in circumstances where the
“property owner would like to use the property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited
by the ordinance.”
Agenda Item H3
Packet Page Number 106 of 259
2
The Supreme Court stated that “unless and until the Legislature takes action to provide a
more flexible variance standard for municipalities, we are constrained by the language of
the statute to hold that a municipality does not have the authority to grant a variance
unless the applicant can show that his or her property cannot be put to reasonable use
without a variance.”
On May 6, 2011, the State of Minnesota enacted the revised variance provisions.
Previous Variance Criteria from State Statute
The City Council was required to make the following findings to approve a variance:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
“Undue hardship”, as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question
cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official
controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not
created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential
character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue
hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
Revised Variance Criteria from State Statute
The new provisions of state law require that variances shall only be permitted when they
are found to be:
(1) In harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control;
(2) Consistent with the comprehensive plan;
(3) When there are practical difficulties in complying with the official control. “Practical
difficulties” means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a
reasonable manner not permitted by an official control. The plight of the landowner
is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner and the
variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
DISCUSSION
The Primary Changes
The differences between the former variance guidelines and the revised language are:
1. The new statute now states that variances must be consistent with the
comprehensive plan. This was not mentioned in the previous language.
Packet Page Number 107 of 259
3
2. Cities must now determine that the property owner is encountering “practical
difficulties” because of ordinance provisions that regulate the use of his or her
property. Previously, the terminology was that, to grant a variance the city must
determine that strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause the property owner
“undue hardship” because of circumstances unique to the property. Practical
difficulties exist when:
a. A property owner proposes to use their property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the ordinance;
b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and
not created by the landowner, and;
c. The variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality.
3. The previous language stated that the city may grant a variance if the use was
reasonable. The new language states that a variance may be granted if a property
cannot be put to a reasonable use without a variance.
There may not seem to be a great distinction between the former and the revised
variance provisions, but the city council should amend all references to variances in our
ordinances to coincide with the amended wording in the state statute.
SUMMARY
Staff recommends the following changes:
Deleting the reference to the statutory number and simply require compliance with
“state statute.” This is to avoid inaccuracy in case the state changes their
numbering.
Deleting the specifics about variance findings and simply require compliance with the
state law.
Deleting the reference to appeals of the city council’s decision to district court. This
ordinance should be specific to the city’s process and not to a possible district court
process.
The existing ordinance was incorrect in allowing the city council’s decision to be
within 90 days after the public hearing. State law requires that the city council decide
on land use matters within 60 days from the acceptance of a complete application by
the planning staff.
COMMISSION ACTIONS
October 4, 2011: The planning commission recommended approval with no changes.
Packet Page Number 108 of 259
4
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the ordinance amendment revising Section 2-41, Authority to Hear and Decide
Zoning Appeals and Requests for Variances.
p:\ ORD\Variance\ Variance Authority Amendment Section 2-41 CC 11 11 te
Attachments:
1. Ordinance Amendment to Section 2-41
Packet Page Number 109 of 259
5
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. ___
AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CONCERNING THE CITY COUNCIL’S
AUTHORITY TO REVIEW VARIANCE REQUESTS FROM THE LITERAL
PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE
The Maplewood City Council approves the following revision to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances. (Additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out.)
Section 1. Section 2-41of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as
follows:
Sec. 2-41. Authority to hear and decide zoning appeals and requests for
variances.
(a) Appeals and variances. The city council shall hear and decide all appeals from
alleged erroneous decisions of any administrative or enforcement officer of the
city in matters relating to the administration and enforcement of the zoning
ordinances of the city. The council shall also hear requests for variances from
the literal provisions of the zoning ordinance in chapter 44, subject to the
requirements outlined in state statute. when their strict enforcement would cause
undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property
under consideration and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated
that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of chapter 44.
Variances Such grants shall not allow provide for a use which is not permitted
under the zoning classification in which the property is located. The council may
impose conditions in granting variances to ensure compliance and to protect
adjacent properties. In matters relating to planning, the city council shall have
the powers as set forth by state statute. in Minn. Stats. ss 462.359, subd. 4.
(b) Procedures. Appeals may be brought before the city council by any affected
person. Appearance before the council may be in person or by agent or
attorney. The council shall make their decision schedule a hearing within 60
days after receiving a complete application an appeal is submitted in writing,
subject to the review guidelines prescribed by state statute. All notices of appeal
must be filed with the director of community development within the time
prescribed by applicable law, ordinance or regulation. The decision of the city
council shall be final, and no further action shall be required or allowed by the
city, except that the council may, in accordance with the decision, rescind or
otherwise alter any decision previously made which may have been the subject
of the appeal. Further appeal may be taken to the district court of the county
providing such appeal is made within 20 days after the date of the decision of the
city council.
Packet Page Number 110 of 259
6
(c) Decision. The city council shall render its decision on any appeal within 90 days
after the date of the end of the hearing.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the approval by the city council and
publishing in the official newspaper.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance revision on ___________.
_________________
Mayor
Attest:
______________________
City Clerk
Packet Page Number 111 of 259
MEMORANDUM
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment of Section 44-13 Giving the City Council
Authority to Consider Variances from the Zoning Code (first reading)
VOTE: Simple Majority Vote Required to Approve
DATE: November 7, 2011
INTRODUCTION
On May 6, 2011, the revised variance legislation took effect, which gives municipalities
the authority and guidelines for granting variances from the provisions of the city
ordinance.
Staff will be presenting various ordinance amendments to the planning commission and
city council where the existing ordinance language no longer addresses the revised
variance legislation as established by the State Legislature.
BACKGROUND
Reason for the Statutory Change
In 2008, the City of Minnetonka issued a variance to a residential property owner
permitting the expansion of a legal, non-conforming garage. The city, relying on a 1989
Court of Appeals decision, concluded that the grant of a variance was reasonable. The
city’s decision was challenged by an adjacent property owner. Both the District Court
and the Minnesota Court of Appeals agreed that the city’s decision was appropriate. On
June 24, 2010, the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and found
the city’s decision impermissible.
The Supreme Court examined the statutory definition of “undue hardship” in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462.357, and concluded that a city’s authority to issue a variance is
limited to those very rare cases where the property cannot be put to “a reasonable use”
without the variance. This establishes a high threshold for both the city and the property
owner when considering variance requests.
The Supreme Court reviewed the parallel county variance authority language that allows
for variances in situations of “practical difficulties” or “hardship.” The Supreme Court
found that the city authority was more limited because it did not contain the “practical
difficulties” provision. The court explicitly recognized that it was changing a longstanding
standard that cities have relied on in considering variance requests. In particular, the
court specifically rejected a 1989 Court of Appeals interpretation of the phrase “undue
hardship,” which allowed for the grant of a variance in circumstances where the
“property owner would like to use the property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited
by the ordinance.”
Agenda Item H4
Packet Page Number 112 of 259