Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2003 05-12 City Council Packet
Council /Manager's Workshop 6: 00 p. m. AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, May 12, 2003 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 09 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 1. Police Department Promotions and Recognitions 2. Emergency Management Director 3. Boy Scout Troop 187 G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Purchase of Single -Axle Plow Truck Dump Body 3. Landfall Cops `n Kids Fishing Clinic 4. Food Permit Approval and Waiver of Fee -Boy Scout Troo p 187 e H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m. Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements — City Project 02 -10 Public Hearing, Approve Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 Votes) 2. 7:00 p.m. Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements — City Project 02 -10 c " Qs ment Hearing Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll 3. 7:15 p.m. Maplewood Drive /Keller Parkway Resurfacing City Project 03 -02 g Y J Assessment Hearing Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll 4. 7:20 p.m. Tax- Increment Financing Plan for Housing istrict No. 1 -7 ( Van D � ke y Village) AGENDA ITEM ]NO'S DRAFT- MINUTES CITY COUNCIL /MANAGER WORKSHOP Monday, April 28, 2003 Action by Council Council Chambers, City Hall 6:00 p .m. D.r A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. Robert Cardinal, Mayor Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Others Present: City Manager Fursman City Attorney Kelly Assistant City Manager Coleman City Clerk Guilfoile Parks and Recreation Director Anderson Public Works Director Ahl Fire Chief Lukin APPROVAL OF AGENDA Present Present (Arrived at 6:39 p.m.) Present Present Present Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All NEW BUSINESS 1. Emergency Management City Manager Fursman provided an overview of the Emergency Management Program. Fire Chief Lukin gave specifics of the program and the changes and accomplishments that have been made throughout 2002 to date. City Attorney Kelly gave a legal opinion regarding the Emergency Management Program and the Director of Emergency Management specifically. Bob Dollerschell gave an overview of the Emergency Managements SkyWarn Program. Council/Manager Workshop 04 -28 -03 1 �i The following persons were also heard: Bill McKiska- Former Maplewood Fire Chief Bob Beaty - Former Oakdale Fire Chief Carma Kumlin- Newest Member of the Maplewood Emergency Management Team Kim Ketterhagen- State Emergency Department Coordinator for the 10 City Metro area Mayor Cardinal distributed a resume from Timothy Butler, whom he feels would be a strong candidate for the Director of Emergency Management position. E. FUTURE TOPICS 1. Sidewalk Study - Overall City Plan 2. Street Scape Plan 3. Affordable Housing and Workforce Housing F. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Juenemann moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:05 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All Council/Manager Workshop 04 -28 -03 2 AGENDA IrTrEM N 0e J A. Be C. DRAFT -- MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:15 P.M., Monday, April 28, 2003 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 03 -08 CALL TO ORDER: Action bY Council Tate Endorsed Modified Rejected .�J A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:15 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from the Council/Manager Workshop Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the Council /Manager Workshop Minutes of April 14, 2003 as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes - All 2. Minutes from the April 14, 2003 City Council Meeting, Meeting No. 03 -07 Councilmember Collins moved to approve the City Council Minutes of April 14, 2003 meeting ea o orA da A Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F3. Nate Dey -Mr. Hockey F4. Acting Emergency Management Ayes -All M8. LMC Award Programs M9. Meeting Extensions Director MI. Reconsideration - Hazelwood Street Improvements M2. Recycling Files M3. City Recycling Day M4. Joint Meeting w/ School Districts M5. Sidewalks M6. Environmental Issues M7. Ramsey County Watershed District Councilmember Collins moved to approve the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation -Falun Dafa Month Approved the following proclamation and declared the month of May 2003 as Falun Dafa Month in the City of Maplewood: Whereas, Falun Dafa, also known as Falun Gong, is a powerful mind /body cultivation system originating in prehistoric China and made public by Master Li Hongzhi in 1992; and Whereas, Falun Dafa is a form of what the Chinese call gigong (pronounced "thee- gong'), a system of exercises and teachings that deeply transform the mind and body, whose practitioners experience improved health and newfound energy to mental clarity, stress relief and peace of mind and surveys strongly attest to Falun Dafa's power of resolving conditions that other forms of healing do not; and Whereas, Falun Dafa is practiced in more than 40 countries, by millions of people of all ages, cultures and backgrounds, and almost every state in the United States has Falun Dafa practitioners and exercise locations; and Whereas, Falun Dafa was introduced to Minnesota in the fall of 1998 and since then, volunteers offer free instruction and convene regular group exercise practice sites in the Twin Cities, including Como Parkin Saint Paul, the University of Minnesota and Pathways in Minneapolis; Now, Therefore, I, Bob Cardinal, Mayor of the City of Maplewood, do hereby proclaim May 2003 as Falun Dafa Month. 2. Human Relations Commission Appointment Councilmember Koppen moved to appoint Annastacia Belladonna to the Maplewood Human Relations Commission. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All G. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve consent agenda items 1 -6 and 8 -9. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve consent agenda items 7. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All 1. Approval of Claims City Council 04 -28 -03 2 ACCOUNTS T3AVART 1Q $255,472.75 Checks #60635 thru #60698 dated 4/11 thru 4/15/03 $135,240.20 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 4/7 thru 4/11/03 $126 Checks #60699 thru #60764 dated 4/17 thru 4/22/03 $217 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 4/14 thru 4/17/03 $734 Total Accounts Payable p A VT? nT T $403,363. P ayroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 4/11/03 $25,737.57 Payroll Deduction checks #93219 thru #93225 dated 4/11/03 $429,101.22 Total Payroll $1,163,764.17 GRAND TOTAL 2. White Bear Township Aquatics Agreement Approved the lifeguard service contract with White Bear Township as proposed. 3. Special Tax Assessment for Property at 2575 Carver Avenue Adopted the following resolution allowing the city, or an agent of the city, to repair the septic system located at 2575 Carver Avenue and assess back the costs associated with this repair to the property in the form of a special tax assessment: RESOLUTION NO. 03-04-064 RESOLUTION APPROVING REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF SEPTIC SYSTEM AT 2575 CARVER AVENUE AND ORDERING THE COST OF REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT TO BE ASSESSED ON THE PROPERTY. WHEREAS, upon the City of Maplewood's inspection of Patty Gearin ( "Owner ")'s property at 2575 Carver Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, Parcel Number 24.18.22.12.0010 ( "Property "), surface discharge of effluent from a septic tank located on the Property was found; WHEREAS, due to the effluent's potential effect on the public and the environment, the City and the Owner wish to properly collapse the existing holding tank, remove it from service, install a new holding tank and return the vegetation to its preexisting condition; City Council 04 -28 -03 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 19 -12 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, the Owner has been served with notice by the City stating that the above work on the property must be completed; WHEREAS, the Owner has stated that she is financially unable to properly perform the above work in time stated in the City's notice; WHEREAS, the City may take action to perform the above work on the Property; WHEREAS, the Owner supports the above work on her Property by the City and has agreed to payment of the proposed assessment: a. Gearin - PIN 24.28.22.12.0010 Removal and Installation: 25% Expenses: Total: $ refer to total. $ refer to total. $ * not to exceed 6,250.00. WHEREAS, Ms. Gearin, based on an agreement for the assessment amount of $ * 6,250.00 for removal of the Materials from the Property, agrees to waive the notice of hearing, hearing and right to appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 429.061, et al; WHEREAS, Ms. Gearin has agreed and hereby directs the City of Maplewood to place the respective total amount of assessment as follows: a. Gearin, $ * 6,250.00 ; with the Ramsey County Auditor for the 2004 property tax rolls. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THAT: The City and Ms. Gearin have agreed to an assessment amount for the above work on the Property in the total amount of $ * 6,250.00 said amount representing the following: Removal and Installation: $ refer to total 25% Expenses: $ refer to total Total: $ * 6,250.00 4. Kennard/Frost Area Streets, Project 02 -10: Resolutions - Calling for Public Hearing and Calling for Assessment Hearing -6 Parcels Approved the following resolutions: Calling for Public Hearing and Calling for Assessment Hearing for the Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements, City Project 02 -10 : RESOLUTION 03 -04 -065 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING City Council 04 -28 -03 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted June 10, 2002, a report had been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of Kennard /Frost Area Streets, City Project 02 -10, and said report was received by the council on January 13, 2003, and WHEREAS, the report provided information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 27, 2003, for the city council to consider the improvement in accordance with the report and the assessment of benefiting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, the improvement was ordered by the city council on January 27, 2003, following the public hearing, and WHEREAS, it was later determined that the following six parcels had inadvertently not been sent notice of the original public hearing: PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0025, PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0031 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0032 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0033 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0034 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0035 1915 Maryknoll Avenue 1872 Prosperity Avenue 1871 Maryknoll Avenue 1885 Maryknoll Avenue 1891 Maryknoll Avenue 1899 Maryknoll Avenue, and WHEREAS, a public hearing is still desired to determine whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, as it relates to the six parcels referenced above, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $3,160,500. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 12th day of May 2003 in the council chambers of city hall at 7 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. RESOLUTION 03 -04 -066 ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared an assessment roll for the Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements, City Project 02 -10, and the said assessment roll is on file in the office of the city engineer, and WHEREAS, a public hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. on May 12, 2003, to determine whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, as it relates to the six parcels referenced below: PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0025 1915 Maryknoll Avenue City Council 04 -28 -03 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0031, 1872 Prosperity Avenue PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0032 1871 Maryknoll Avenue PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0033, 1885 Maryknoll Avenue PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0034 1891 Maryknoll Avenue PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0035 1899 Maryknoll Avenue, and WHEREAS, a May 12th, 2003, assessment hearing was ordered by the city council on April 14, 2003, and WHEREAS, it is still desired to include the six above referenced parcels in the assessment roll for the Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements, and WHEREAS, the city council may still elect, following the public hearing, to exempt the six above referenced parcels from the assessment roll if public benefit has is not determined. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The above referenced parcels shall be included in the assessment hearing to be held on the 12th day of May 2003, at the city hall at 7:00 p.m., following the public hearing, to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered. 5. Temporary Gambling Resolution -VFW Post 8901 -1964 English Street Adopted the following resolution approving the Temporary Gambling Resolution for Lawrense Kaiser on behalf of Moose Lodge 963 and VFW 8901 located at 1946 English Street: RESOLUTION 03 -04 -067 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the temporary permit for lawful gambling is approved for VFW 8901. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. City Council 04 -28 -03 6. Food Permit Approval and Waiver of Fee -Boy Scout Troop 64 Approved the miscellaneous permit to sell food at Cross Lutheran Church and to waive the $46.00 permit fee. 7. Proclamation- Stephanie Sward - Hometown Day Approved the following proclamation and declared the date of May 3 rd as the Official Stephanie Sward Hometown Day in the City of Maplewood: Whereas, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota is actively concerned and involved in nurturing and supporting the educational andphysical development and achievements of its natives and residents, and Whereas, the achievements academically and athletically of our native citizen Stephanie Sward are a source of great community pride and interest as she represents our hometown in the nation and at the University of Minnesota as an accomplished athlete and student, and Whereas, she will be especially honored during ceremonies at the University of Minnesota; and "Rainbow Foods Hometown Days " celebration of her achievements is representative of the recognition our City supports, Therefore, as Mayor of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, I hereby do ordain and declare the date of MAY 3, 2003 AS THE OFFICIAL STEPHANIE SWARD HOMETOWN DAY IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD. 8. , Car Allowance -City Manager Approved the request from the City Manager to convert his approved car allowance into salary. 9. Approval of Energy Management System Upgrade Approved the purchase and installation of a Trane Summit Energy Management System at the Maplewood Community Center. H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:40 p.m. Assessment Hearing- Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, Project 02- 14: Resolution — Adoption of Assessment Roll with Revisions a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: Gary Blair, 1769 Reaney Avenue, St. Paul d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. City Council 04 -28 -03 Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution for the Adoption of the Assessment Roll for the Parkway Lift Station Improvements, Project 02 -14: RESOLUTION 03 -04 -068 ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on March 31, 2003, calling for a Public Hearing, the assessment roll for the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, City Project 02 -14, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, five property owners have filed objections to their assessments according to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows: 1. None NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review the objections received and report to the City Council at the regular meeting on May 12, 2003, as to their recommendations for adjustments. 2. The assessment roll for the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements as amended, without those property owners' assessments who have filed objections, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2004 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, but no later than August 1, 2003, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time after August 1, 2003, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. City Council 04 -28 -03 5. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after August 1, 2003, but no later than September 2 2003, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All 2. 8:00 p.m. Utility Easement Vacation - Schroeder Milk (2080 Rice Street) a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics from the report. C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: Robert Banken, 2211 Regent, White Bear Lake d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution for the vacation of the water utility easement on the Schroeder Milk property. The reason for this vacation is because the easement is no Ionizer needed due to the rerouting of the water main: RESOLUTION 03 -04 -069 EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Schroeder Milk Company has applied for the vacation of the following: Water main easement recorded under document number 1066193. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On April 7, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this vacation. 2. On April 28, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the property located at 2080 Rice Street, legally described as follows: That part of the following described property: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying South of the South line of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 447, files of the Registrar of Titles, Ramsey County, Minnesota, and North of the North line of IRENE' S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County, City Council 04 -28 -03 Minnesota. And Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of said IRENE'S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL, together with alleys in Blocks 1, 2 and 3 vacated by Doc. No. 650000; and that part of McMillan Street, vacated, lying East of the Right of Way of Rice Street as widened, in Book 1312 of Deeds, page 421 as platted in IRENE' S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL, vacated by Doc. No. 650001; and all of Kenna Street, vacated and all of Irene Street, vacated, as platted in IRENE' S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL, vacated by Doc. No. 650001. All that part of the fractional West 1 /2 of the Northwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, described and bounded as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said West 1 /2 of the Northwest Quarter 1214 feet North of the Southeast corner of said West 1 /2 of Northwest Quarter; thence running West on a straight line 1061 feet to the West line of the West 1 /2 of Northwest Quarter; thence North on the said West line 200 feet; thence East on a straight line to the East line of said West 1 /2 of Northwest Quarter at a point 200 feet North of the place of beginning; thence South on said East line 200 feet to the place of commencement. Which lines easterly of a line described as commencing at the southeast corner of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 447; thence South 89 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the south line of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 447, a distance of 739.18 feet to the point if beginning of the line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 46 minutes 13 seconds East a distance of 802.76 feet to the south line of the above described property and said line there terminating. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the above - described easement vacation because the easement is no longer needed due to the rerouting of the water main. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All 3. 8:05 p.m. Sibley Cove Apartments Reconsideration (County Road D) Land Use Plan Change (BC to R -3 (H)) (4 Votes) Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Design Approval a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics from the report. C. Commissioner Mueller presented the Planning Commission Report. d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: David Steele, the applicant, MWF Properties Keith Larson, 1990 East County Road D, Maplewood Shirley Muelker, 266 Hardsman Ave. South, St. Paul Gary Olson, 2330 Maplewood Lane E, Maplewood City Council 04 -28 -03 10 Pat Flaherty, 3100 Arial Street Maplewood Bob Larson, 1990 East County Road D, Maplewood Sally Renish, 2025 East County Road D, Maplewood Bob Bankers, 3100 Ariel Street, Maplewood Hans Neve, 2998 Chishom Parkway, Maplewood Howard Nelson, 2175 East County Road D, Maplewood Howard Simon, 1990 East County Road D, Maplewood Bonnie Woodbeck, 2025 Ide Streeet #104, Maplewood Kurt Soular, 2974 Chisholm Parkway, Maplewood e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution for the land use plan change from BC business commercial) to R -3 (H) (residential high density). This is for the 7.1 -acre site of the Sibley Cove Housing Development: RESOLUTION 03 -04 -070 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, David Steele, representing MWF Properties, applied for a change to the city's land use plan from BC (business commercial) to R -3(H) (residential high density). WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property located on the south side of County Road D, west of Ariel Street and east of White Bear Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On February 19, 2003, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the proposed plan amendment. 2. On March 10, 2003, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. 3. On April 28, 2003, the city council again considered this request. The council again considered reports from city staff and the testimony given at the meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described changes for the following reasons: 1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's goals, objectives and policies for high - density residential land use in the comprehensive plan. This includes: a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing residential and commercial land uses. b. Being near a collector street, being between two arterial streets and is near open space and shopping and services. City Council 04 -28 -03 11 2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. The on -site pond and large setback from Woodlynn Avenue will separate the apartment building from the properties to the south. b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local residential streets. The existing street pattern keeps the apartment traffic separate from the existing single dwellings and other residences. There should be less traffic from this development than from a commercial development on the same site. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Sibley Cove Apartment Development on County Road D, west of Aerial Street: RESOLUTION 03 -04 -071 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. David Steele, representing MWF Properties, applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the Sibley Cove apartment planned unit development (PUD). WHEREAS, this permit applies to the undeveloped property on the south side of County Road D between Ariel Street and White Bear Avenue. The legal description is: PARCEL A: The Easterly 239.00 feet of the Westerly 329.31 feet of the Southerly 428.33 feet of the Northerly 681.33 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota. PARCEL B: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, more completely described as follows: Commencing at a point 33 feet South of the North 1 /4 corner of said Section 2; thence running South on North and South 1 /4 line of said Section 2, a distance of 615.15 feet to a point; thence East a distance of 90.31 feet to a point; thence North a distance of 615.15 feet to a point on the South right -of -way line of County Road "D "; and thence West, a distance of 90.31 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL C: The North Ten (N 10) acres of the East Twenty (E 20) acres of the North Half (N' /2) of the Northwest Quarter (NW ' / a) of Section Two (2), Township Twenty -nine (29) North, Range Twenty -two (22) West, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, subject to White Bear Avenue and County Road "D ", excepting the following portions thereof, to wit: Except the South One hundred (S 100) feet thereof; and City Council 04 -28 -03 12 Except that part thereof lying West of the Easterly line of White Bear Avenue; and Except that part thereof described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of County Road "D" and White Bear Avenue; thence running East along the Southerly line of said County Road "D ", Seventy -five (75) feet; thence running South and parallel with the West line of said Section Two (2), One hundred twenty -five (125) feet; thence West and parallel with the Southerly line of said County Road "D" to a point on the Easterly line of White Bear Avenue; thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said White Bear Avenue to the point of beginning; and Except that part thereof described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of County Road "D ", a distance of One hundred seventy -five (175) feet Easterly of the Southeast corner of the intersection of County Road "D" and White Bear Avenue; thence running Southerly on a line parallel with the West section line of said Section Two (2) for a distance of One hundred twenty -five (125) feet; thence Westerly on a line parallel to the Southerly right of way line of County Road "D" to a point, Seventy -five (75) feet Easterly of the Easterly right of way line of White Bear Avenue; thence Northerly on a deflection angle of Ninety (90) degrees to the Southerly right of way line of said County Road "D "; thence Easterly along said right of way line to the point of beginning; and Except that part thereof described as follows: The West One hundred fifty (W 150) feet of the East Three hundred sixty -seven (E 367) feet of the North Three hundred forty and fifty hundredths (N 340.50) feet thereof, except County Road "D" right of way, and Except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of White Bear Avenue and County Road "D "; thence Easterly along the South line of County Road "D" a distance of One hundred seventy -five (175) feet; thence in a Southerly direction and parallel to the West line of said Section Two (2), a distance of One hundred twenty -five (125) feet to the point of beginning; thence in a Southerly direction and parallel to the West line of said Section Two (2), a distance of Ninety -five (95) feet; thence in a Westerly direction and parallel to County Road "D" to the Easterly line of White Bear Avenue; and thence Northwesterly along the East line of White Bear Avenue, a distance of Ninety -five and eleven hundredths (95.11) feet; thence Easterly and parallel to County Road "D" to the point of beginning; and Except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at a point on the centerline of County Road "D" and Thirty -three (33) feet East of the centerline of White Bear Avenue; thence in a Southerly direction along the East line of White Bear Avenue, a distance of Three hundred forty and eighty -seven hundredths (340.87) feet to the point of beginning; thence East and parallel with County Road "D ", a distance of Three hundred thirteen and ninety hundredths (313.90) feet; thence South, One hundred fifty -three (S 153.0) feet; thence West and parallel with County Road "D ", a distance of Three hundred eight and sixty -two hundredths (308.62) feet to the East line of White Bear Avenue; thence in a Northerly direction, One hundred fifty -three and nineteen hundredths (153.19) feet to the point of beginning; and City Council 04 -28 -03 13 Except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at a point on the Easterly line of White Bear Avenue, Two hundred twenty and twenty -six hundredths (220.26) feet Southerly of the Southeast corner of the intersection of County Road "D" and White Bear Avenue; thence Easterly on a line drawn parallel to the Southerly right of way line of County Road "D ", a distance of One hundred sixty -seven and six hundredths (167.06) feet; thence Southerly at an angle of Ninety (90) degrees, a distance of Eighty -seven and fifty hundredths (87.50) feet; thence Westerly on a line drawn parallel to the Southerly right of way line of County Road "D" to the Easterly right of way line of White Bear Avenue; thence Northerly along said Easterly line of White Bear Avenue to the point of beginning; and Except that part of the following described parcel lying Westerly of the Easterly 114.15 feet thereof; That part of the North 10 acres of the East 20 acres of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Easterly right -of -way line of White Bear Avenue and the North line of the South 100 feet of said North 10 acres; thence Easterly along said North line of the South 100 feet, a distance of 309.40 feet; thence Northerly at a right angle, 155.94 feet to a point on a line parallel with and distant 493.50 feet South of the North line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2; thence Westerly along said parallel line to the Easterly right -of -way line of White Bear Avenue; thence Southerly along said right -of -way line to the point of beginning. All in the NE 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22. (PINs 02- 29 -22 -12 -0009, 02- 29 -22 -12 -0010 and 02- 29 -22 -21 -0017) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On February 19, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On March 10, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners— The_council_guve everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. 3. On April 28, 2003, the city council held another public hearing about this proposal. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the nearby property owners. The city council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and of the planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. City Council 04 -28 -03 14 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans date - stamped January 24, 2003. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, sidewalks, tree and driveway and parking lot plans. In addition, the applicant shall include: a. Changes to the plans to minimize the loss or removal of natural vegetation including keeping and protecting as many of the large trees along the north and east property lines (near the daycare center) as possible. b. Revised plans for storm water pond locations and designs as suggested or required by the watershed district or city engineer. The ponds shall meet the city's design standards and shall include best management practices and rainwater gardens wherever practical. c. A storm water management plan for the proposal. d. All the changes and meet all the conditions noted by the city engineer in the memo dated February 10, 2003. 4. The design of the pond shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall provide to the city a 20- foot -wide drainage and utility easement over the storm sewer pipe between the pond and the Arial Street right -of -way. City Council 04 -28 -03 15 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b. Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Remove any debris, junk and garbage from the site. d. Install a 6- foot -wide concrete sidewalk along the west side of Ariel Street between County Road D and Woodlynn Avenue. e. Provide the city with verification that the apartment building will meet the state's noise standards. This shall be with a study, testing or other documentation. If the noise on this site is a factor, then the contractor will have to build the apartment building so that it can meet the noise standards. This may be done with thicker walls, heavier windows, requiring air conditioning or other sound - deadening construction methods. The developer shall provide the city with this documentation before the city will issue a building permit for the apartment building. 6. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. 7. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day -to -day transportation on site. If the city decides there are excess parking spaces available on site, then the city may allow the parking of these on site. 8. The developer shall provide an on -site storm shelter in the apartment building. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. 9. . The city council shall review this permit in one year. 10. The owner /manager of Sibley Cove shall require every tenant to review and sign a "noise disclaimer" with their lease agreement. This disclaimer form shall be approved by the city staff. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the design plans for Sibley Cove Apartment Development on County Road E, West of Aerial Street. This approval is for the 80 -unit building and does not include the 20 -unit addition on the east end of the site. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the code, and the developer or contractor shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Complete the following before the city issues a grading permit or a building permit: a. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These City Council 04 -28 -03 16 plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, sidewalk and driveway and parking lot plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: (1) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with city code. (2) The grading plan shall: (a) Include building, floor elevation, water elevation and contour information. These shall include the normal water elevation and 100- year high water elevation. (b) Include contour information for the land that the construction will disturb. (c) Show sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. The ponds or basins shall meet the city's design standards and shall include best management practices and rainwater gardens wherever practical. (d) Show all proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 on the proposed construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. This shall include covering these slopes with wood -fiber blankets and seeding them with a "no mow" vegetation rather than using sod or grass. (e) Show all retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls more than four feet tall require a building permit from the city. (f) Show as little disturbance as possible on the north and east sides of the site (near the daycare center) to minimize the loss or removal of natural vegetation. This is to keep and protect as many of the large trees along the north and east property lines (near the daycare center) as possible. (3) The tree plan shall: (a) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or tree removal. (b) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site. (c) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. (d) Be consistent with the approved grading and landscape plans. (4) The design of the storm water pond shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall be responsible for getting any needed City Council 04 -28 -03 17 off -site grading or drainage easements and for recording all necessary easements. (5) All the parking areas and driveways shall have continuous concrete curb and gutter. (6) The driveways shall meet the following standards: 24 -foot width - -no parking on either side and 28 -foot width -- parking on one side The developer or contractor shall post the driveways with no parking signs to meet the above - listed standards. (7) The developer shall disturb as little as possible of the area along the north and east property lines near the daycare center. Change the grading plan for this part of the site as recommended by the city engineer. (8) The developer shall install asix- foot -wide concrete sidewalk along Ariel Street between the existing sidewalk north of Woodlynn Avenue and the south property line of the daycare center. (9) Include a storm water management plan, including drainage and ponding calculations, for approval by the city engineer. (10) Make all the changes and meet all the conditions noted by the city engineer in the memo dated February 10, 2003. b. Submit a lawn - irrigation plan to staff showing the location of sprinkler heads. c. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction. d. Submit a revised landscape plan for city staff approval showing: (1) As much of the existing vegetation (including large trees) remaining along the northern and eastern properly lines (near the daycare center) as possible. (2) The manicured or mowed areas from the natural areas. This shall include planting (instead of sodding) the disturbed areas on the south side of the parking lot around the storm water pond with native grasses and native flowering plants. The native grasses and flowering plants shall be those needing little or no maintenance. This is to reduce maintenance costs and to reduce the temptation of mowers to encroach into the pond. Specifically, the developer shall have the natural areas seeded with an upland mixture and lowland mixtures as appropriate. (3) The planting of native grasses, flowering plants and low -level shrubs around the proposed storm water pond. These materials shall extend at least four feet from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the pond. City Council 04 -28 -03 18 (4) The planting details (including flowering plants and shrubs) for the rainwater garden at the northeast corner of the building. e. Get the necessary approvals and permits from the watershed district. f. Submit a revised site lighting plan for city staff approval. This plan shall show how the lighting on the building would add to the site lighting, and the plan should have additional lighting near the driveways, where they intersect the public streets, so the driveways are adequately lit. This plan also shall show details about the proposed light fixtures to ensure they are a design that hides the bulb and lens from view to avoid nuisances. The light fixtures must have concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield glare from the adjacent street right -of -ways and from adjacent properties. g. The developer shall record the following with Ramsey County: (1) The documentation to combine the properties into one property for tax and identification purposes. (2) Aten - foot -wide permanent easement for public street right -of -way and public utility purposes along the south side of the County Road Dright -of- way. h. Have the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) review and approve the proposed utility plans. i. The fire chief shall approve the access to the back (northeast side) of the building for firefighting needs. j. Submit plans for city staff approval for any outdoor trash or recycling containers and enclosures. If the developer wants to build such facilities, the enclosure shall have materials that are compatible with the building, and they shall have gates that are 100 percent opaque. k. Submit plans for city staff approval of the south elevation, including the garage. 1. Submit samples of the proposed building materials and colors to staff for approval. m. Provide the city with verification that the apartment building will meet all state noise standards. This shall be with a study, testing or other documentation. If the noise levels on this site violate any of the state standards, then the contractor will have to construct the building so that it can meet the noise standards. This may be done with thicker walls, heavier windows, requiring air conditioning or other sound - deadening construction methods. The developer shall provide the city with this documentation before the city will issue a building permit for the building. n. A letter of credit or cash escrow for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. City Council 04 -28 -03 19 o. This approval does not include the 20 -unit addition on the east end of the site. The developer or builder shall submit all necessary plans to the CDRB for their approval before the city may issue a building permit for this part of the project. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. c. Install reflectorized stop signs at each exit, a handicap - parking sign for each handicap - parking space and an address on the building. In addition, the applicant shall install "no parking" signs within the site, as required by staff. d. Paint any roof -top mechanical equipment to match the uppermost part of the building. Screen all roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent properly. (code requirement) e. Construct trash dumpster and recycling enclosures as city code requires for any dumpsters or storage containers that the owner or building manager would keep outside the building. Any such enclosures must match the materials and colors of the building. f. Install and taper the concrete sidewalk along Ariel Street to match the driveways. g. Install and maintain an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas. h. Install continuous concrete curb and gutter along all interior driveways and around all open parking stalls. i. Install on -site lighting for security and visibility that follows the approved site lighting plan. All exterior lighting shall follow the approved lighting plan that shows the light spread and fixture design. The light fixtures must have concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield glare from the adjacent street right -of -ways and from adjacent properties. j. Install a six - foot -high solid screening fence along the west property line of the site. The location, design and materials of the fence shall be subject to city staff approval. k. Install a quality video surveillance system that covers the underground garage and its entrance /exit doors. This system shall be subject to the approval of the Maplewood Police Department. 1. The developer or contractor shall: (1) Complete all grading for the site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. City Council 04 -28 -03 20 (2) Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. (3) Remove any debris or junk from the site. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The above - required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the city for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished landscaping by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 5. This approval does not include the signs. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All Afive- minute break was taken. 4. 9:40 p.m. Tax Abatement Hearing a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics from the report. C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: Paul Steinman, Vice President, Springstead, a financial consultant for the city, explained the tax abatement plan. d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution providing the maximum amount of abatement. This is with the understanding that the Council has total discretion in determining a final abatement amount lower than the resolution and hearing notice indicates: RESOLUTION NO. 03-04-072 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENTS City Council 04 -28 -03 21 FOR THE LEGACY VILLAGE PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: 1. Recitals. (a) The Hartford Group (the "Developer ") proposes to construct a mixed use development of approximately 120 -132 senior multifamily, 224 -244 multifamily rental townhomes, 100 -120 multifamily apartments, 150 -230 multifamily owner occupied townhomes, and between 205,000 and 390,000 square feet of commercial space on property commonly known as the "Haj icek" property located immediately west of Maplewood Mall, and property currently occupied by 5 homes bordering the east and fronting on Hazelwood Avenue, adjacent to the Hajicek property. The Developer has requested that the City abate the City's share of the property taxes to be generated from this development. In addition, the City has a desire to abate its share of the property taxes to be generated from this development to pay a portion of the costs of providing the public infrastructure necessary for the development. The maximum term of such abatement will be for fifteen (15) years beginning in 2005 and ending in 2019, pending denial of participation in the abatement by either the County or School District. Should all three (3) governmental units, (City, County, School District), agree to participate in the abatement, the maximum term will be for ten (10) years beginning in 2005 and ending in 2014. The abatement will apply to property described by property identification numbers on the attached "Exhibit A." The revenues that are generated through the abatement program will provide a source of funds to acquire and demolish the five (5) aforementioned residential homes, and pay other costs related to such acquisition and demolition; and to finance the cost of road construction/reconstruction, storm sewer, streetscape improvements, wetland enhancements, sanitary sewer, and water improvements, and costs related to such improvements which include financing, legal and administrative expenses including, but not limited to the following projects: (i) County Road D (Hazelwood — 61) (ii) County Road D (61 — Highbridge) (iii) TH 61 (Beam to I- 694) (iv) County Road D (Hazelwood — WBA) (v) County Road D water mainTH 61 frontage road (vi) Kennard Street (Beam — D) (vii) Hazelwood (C —Beam) (viii) Hazelwood (Beam - D) (ix) White Bear Avenue (x) County Road D /Southlawn 22 City Council 04 -28 -03 (b) On the date hereof, the Council held a public hearing on the question of the Abatement, and said hearing was preceded by at least 10 days but not more than 30 days prior published notice hereof. (c) The Abatement is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815 (the "Abatement Law "). 2. Findings for the Abatement The City Council hereby makes the following findings: 1. The Council expects the benefits to the City of the Abatement to at least equal the costs thereof because the Council expects that the Project will have an estimated market value for tax purposes of between $123,040,000 and $175,295,000, generating estimated annual property taxes to the City of Maplewood of approximately $643,232 - $925,837 per year. The abatement program is intending to finance acquisition, demolition, and infrastructure costs equal to the amount of anticipated abatement revenues. In addition, the completion of the Project fulfills a primary development goal of the City. 2. Granting the Abatement is in the public interest because it will increase or preserve the tax base of the City, provide employment opportunities in the City, finance acquisition, demolition, and public infrastructure and help develop an undeveloped area. 3. The Council expects the public benefits described above to be derived from the Abatement will equal or exceed the costs to the City thereof. 4. The Property is not located in a tax increment financing district. 5. In any year, the total amount of property taxes abated by the City by this and other resolutions does not exceed the greater of five percent (5 %) of the current levy or $100,000. 3. Terms of Abatement The Abatement is hereby approved. The terms of the Abatement are as follows: 1. The Abatement shall be for fifteen (15) years and shall apply to the taxes payable in the years 2005 through 2019, inclusive. 2. The Abatement shall be as follows: for property taxes payable on the Project in each of the years 2005 through 2019, the City will abate the City's property tax amount generated by the Project which the City has received; provided that there shall be no Abatement if the proposed acquisition, demolition, and infrastructure improvements are not undertaken and provided further that the total amount of the Abatement shall not exceed the actual acquisition, demolition, and infrastructure costs. 3. The Abatement may be modified or changed every second year after the date hereof during the term set forth in (a) above, with the consent of the Developer and approval of the City. 4. The Abatement shall be subject to all the terms and limitations of the Abatement Law. 5. The City or the Developer will finance acquisition, demolition, and infrastructure costs. If the Developer incurs the acquisition, demolition, and infrastructure improvement costs, the Abatement will be paid to the Developer pursuant to an Abatement Agreement executed as provided in (f) below. If the City incurs the acquisition, demolition, and infrastructure improvement costs, the Abatement will be retained by the City. Abatement revenues will be applied to reimburse costs incurred for acquisition, demolition, and infrastructure, including financing- related costs. Reimbursement will be limited to the lesser of actual acquisition, demolition, and infrastructure costs or the amount of abatement revenues received during the fifteen (15) year abatement term. 23 City Council 04 -28 -03 6. To be entitled to the Abatement if the Developer incurs the acquisition, demolition, and infrastructure improvement costs, the Developer and the City will execute an Abatement Agreement, but not prior to approval by the City Council. If any provision of this resolution conflicts with any provision of the Abatement Agreement, the latter shall apply and govern. 7. In order to be entitled to the Abatement, the Developer shall not be in default within the City of any of its payment obligations respecting any taxes, assessments, utility charges or other governmental impositions. Exhibit A Property Identification Numbers of the Abatement Area I. 032922120001— Hajicek 032922120002 — Hajicek 032922120003 — Hajicek 032922120004 — Hajicek 032922120005 — Hajicek 032922120006 — Hajicek 032922120007 — Hajicek 032922120015 — Hajicek 032922120016 — Hajicek 032922120017 — Hajicek 032922120018 — Hajicek 032922120019 — Hajicek 032922120020 — Hajicek 032922110002 — Hajicek 032922120009 — Gates 032922120010— Supan 032922120021— Gebhard & Uhlenbrauck 032922120023 — Peterson 032922120024 — Kincaid Ayes -All Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk AWARD OF BIDS 1. Award of Lighting Contract to Excel Energy for Edgerton Park Parking Lot a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Parks and Recreation Director Anderson presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to proceed with the Xcel Energy outdoor lighting product with the monies to be budgeted for the park development fund and, furthermore, that the finance director make the necessary financial adjustment from the park development fund to pay for the proposed improvement to Edgerton Park. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All 2. Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, Project 02 -14: Resolution for Award of Bids 24 City Council 04 -28 -03 a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the following resolution accepting the bids and awarding construction contract to Forest lake Contracting Inc. in the amount of $412,760.00: RESOLUTION 03 -04 -073 RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on March 31, 2003, plans and specifications for the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements have been approved, and WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on March 31, 2003, bids were received and publicly opened and read aloud on April 18, 2003 as follows: 1. Forest Lake Contracting $412 2. F.M. Frattalone Excavating & Grading $450 3. Shurcon, Inc. $536,465.00 4. Lametti & Sons, Inc. $587 5. Barbarossa and Sons, Inc.. Bid Rejected NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Said bids as opened on April 18, 2003 are hereby received and acknowledged. 2. A construction contract in the amount of $412,760 is hereby awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. and the mayor and city manager are hereby authorized to execute said construction contract. 3. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All 3. Phone System Bid Award and Contracts for Related Equipment a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. C. Tom Pavak, with Elert Associates provided further specifics. Councilmember Koppen moved to authorize the following contracts: Ideacom Mid - America -phone system at City Hall campus ad remote sites $189,187 Comcast -fiber optic installation to four remote sites $63,810 25 City Council 04 -28 -03 ECost.com -Data Switches $20,805 Biznet.com -Fiber Modules $17,500 Cabling Services, Corp -Fiber Patch Cabling $2,800 10% Contingency $29,410 The appropriate budget changes totaling $323,512 Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Van Dyke Village Town Houses (Van Dyke Street, north of County Road B) Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Design Approval a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics from the report. C. Bruce Mogren, the developer, provided further specifics. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit for a 20 unit planned development for the Van Dyke Village Town House Development on the west side of Van Dyke Street, north of County Road B: RESOLTUION 03 -04 -074 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Bruce Mogren applied for a conditional use permit to build a 20 -unit town house development known as Van Dyke Village. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at the west side of Van Dyke Street, north of County Road B and east of White Bear Avenue. The legal descriptions are: Parcel 1: That part of the West 90 feet of the East 360 feet of Lot 2, Block 20, Smith and Taylor's Addition of North St. Paul, lying East of the West 41 feet thereof; including that part of the North half of adjoining Sandhurst Avenue, vacated, lying between the extension and across said street of the East line of the West 41 feet of the East 360 feet of Lot 2, and the West line of the East 270 feet of said Lot 2. Parcel 2: The East 270 feet of Lot 2, Block 20, together with the North 2.65 feet of said Lot 2, Block 20, except the West 233.14 feet thereof, and the South 2.65 feet of Lot I. Block 20 except the West 233.14 feet thereof, all in Smith and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul, accruing thereto by reason of vacation thereof. Parcel 3: All that part of Lot 1, Block 20, Smith and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul, except the South 2.65 feet thereof, and except that part described as follows: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Lot 1, distant 2.65 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East parallel to the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 271.49 feet; thence North on a straight line to a point on the North line of said Lot 1, distant 272.06 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence West along said North line of Lot 1 a distance of 272.06 feet to said Northwest corner of said 26 City Council 04 -28 -03 Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 121.38 feet to the point of beginning, and except the South 1 /2 of vacated Laurie Avenue lying adjacent to the North of the excepted tract and herein described. Parcel 4: All that part of Lot 2, Block 13, Smith and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul including the North half of vacated Laurie Avenue, lying adjacent to and South of the tract herein described, except that part of Lot 2, Block 13, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Lot 2, thence East along the South line of said Lot 2 a distance of 272.33 feet to a point, thence Northerly on a straight line to a point of the North line of said Lot 2, a distance of 272.01 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence southerly along the West line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning and excepting there from that part taken for widening of White Bear Avenue, and except the North 1 /2 of vacated Laurie Avenue lying adjacent to and south of the excepted tract herein described. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On March 3, 2003, the planning commission reviewed this request but did not make a recommendation about this permit. 2. On April 14, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. The council, with the approval of the applicant, tabled action on this request. 3. On April 28, 2003, the city council continued their discussion about this proposal. The council gave everyone at the meeting a chance to speak and to present written statements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 27 City Council 04 -28 -03 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The final construction plans may show up to 20 town houses as approved by the city. The city council may approve major changes to the plans. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes to the plans. Such changes shall include revising the grading and site plans to show: a. The developer minimizing the loss or removal of natural vegetation. b. All driveways at least 20 feet wide. If the developer wants to have parking on one side of the driveway, then it must be at least 28 feet wide. c. All parking stalls with a width of at least 9.5 feet and a length of at least 18 feet. d. Revised storm water pond locations and designs as suggested or required by the watershed district or city engineer. The ponds shall meet the city's design standards. e. The developer minimizing the loss or removal of natural vegetation including keeping and protecting as many of the trees as possible. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans with no more than 20 units. These plans shall meet all the conditions and changes noted in the engineer's memo dated February 24, 2003. These shall include: a. The grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails, sidewalks, tree, retaining walls, driveway and parking lot plans. b. A storm water management plan for the proposal. 4. The design of all ponds and rainwater gardens shall meet Maplewood's design standards and shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. If needed, the developer shall be responsible for getting any off -site pond and drainage easements. 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the ponds, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b. Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Remove any debris or junk from the site. 28 City Council 04 -28 -03 d. Install the required sidewalk along Van Dyke Street. 6. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in the Van Dyke Village shall be: a. Front -yard setback (from a public street): minimum - 30 feet, maximum - 40 feet b. Rear -yard setback: 50 feet from any adjacent residential property line c. Side -yard setback (town houses): minimum - 40 feet from the west properly line and 50 feet from the south property line. 7. The developer or builder will pay the city Park Access Charges (PAC fees) for each housing unit at the time of the building permit for each housing unit. 8. The developer shall close on the purchase of the property with the city before the city will issue a grading or a building permit for the project. 9. The property owner shall see that the site is well maintained and properly managed and shall have an on -site manager living on the property. 10. The city council shall review this permit in one year. Councilmember Collins moved to extend the meeting until all agenda items are addressed. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes All 2. County Road D Realignment Improvements, Projects 02 -07 and 02 -08: Discussion of Property Alignment Issues and Presentation of Stormwater /Wetland Management Plan - DISCUSSION ONLY: NO ACTION PROPOSED a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. C. The following persons were heard: Karl Keel, URS, consultant for the project Ron Leaf, SEH, engineers for the project Mark Guess, MNDOT K. NEW BUSINESS 2. Lydia Avenue and Joy Road: Request for Stop Sign on County Road a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. C. Dave Johnson, 2587 Lydia Avenue presented his request. 29 City Council 04 -28 -03 Councilmember Collins m oved to approve directing the City Engineer to request that Ramsey County conduct an engineering evaluation of the Joy Road /Lydia Avenue /Lake Boulevard intersection to determine whether a stop sign is warranted. L. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All 3. Public Works Building Addition, Project 03-19: Authorize Project Funding and Planning Study a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve authorization of a project to expand the Public Works Buildiniz, direct the Finance director to transfer $200,00 from the VEM Fund to a project fund, authorize the Public Works Director to have a planning and scoping study conducted to determine the necessga improvements needed for the project, and authorize the Public Works Director to conduct a process to an architect to design the Public Works Building Arlrlitin-n Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Ayes -All 1. MaryAnn Oie, 6304 Upper 44 Street, Oakdale had questions regarding the land history of the VanDyke Village property. 2. Will Rossbach, 1386 County Road D, spoke regarding the County Road D Realignment. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to give consideration to and review another alternative of the County Road D Realignment project. Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes -Mayor Cardinal and Councilmember Wasiluk Nays - Councilmembers Collins, Juenemann and Koppen Motion Failed. 3. George Supan,3050 Hazelwood N., Maplewood, commented on the new phone system and 911 tracking capabilities. 4. Mike Kolodjski, 9521 North Shore Trail, Forest Lake, asked council to waive the 15 -day waiting period for neighbors to comment on a proposed setback due to already acquiring consent from all neighboring parties. Council indicated that they would not appeal the proposed setback. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Reconsideration of Hazelwood Street 30 City Council 04 -28 -03 Mayor Cardinal moved for reconsideration of Hazelwood Street Improvements from County Road C to Beam Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers, Collins, Koppen and Juenemann Nays - Councilmember Wasiluk 2. Recycling Files /Clean You Files Day -Mayor Cardinal asked staff to look into this day. 3. Recycling Day, April 26- Assistant City Manager Coleman noted how successful the day was with more details on the amount collected coming in the future. 4. Joint Meetings with School Districts -City Manager Fursman is currently working on the agenda and will meet with the Mayor to solidify details in the near future. 5. Sidewalks -Mayor Cardinal asked City Attorney Kelly to research the possibility of property owners being assessed for sidewalk maintenance. 6. Environmental Issues -Mayor Cardinal gave City Manager Fursman a list of Maplewood Leaking Underground Storage Sites provided by the Waterboard. 7. Waterfest -This event will be held Saturday, May 17 at Lake Phalen from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. 8. League of Minnesota Cities Award Program -Mayor Cardinal provided City Manager Fursman with details. 9. Council Meeting Extension - Councilmember Juenemann expressed the need for staff and council to address lengthy meetings and possibly continue meetings on Thursday's at 4:30 p.m. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None 0. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Collins moved to adjourn the meeting at 12:37 a.m. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All 31 City Council 04 -28 -03 AGENDA NO. ' 2 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Richard Fursman City Manager RE: Emergency Management Director DATE: May 5, 2003 Action by Council Date .�. Endorsed Modified Rejected e In accordance with Maplewood's ordinance, the Emergency Management Director is to be appointed by the Mayor and ratified by the City Council. The salary for the position is to be fixed by the City Council. The salary approved by the City Council in 2002 was $10,883 per year. The position was not included in the cost of living adjustment for 2003. At the last meeting, Fire Chief Lukin was appointed acting Emergency Management Director with the understanding that he would not be paid any additional salary by assuming these responsibilities. If an outside person is appointed, the salary, if no changes are made, would be $10,883 per year. The Mayor indicated he would like the Council to consider Tim Butler (summary of qualifications attached). The ordinance lays out a number of requirements; a summary is provided below: • Reports administratively to the City Manager. • Responsible for the organization, administration and operation of the emergency management agency, subject to the direction and control of the City Manager. • Ensures coordination among city departments, nongovernmental groups and with higher and adjacent governments on emergency management activities. • Acts as principal aide and advisor to the City official responsible for direction and control of all emergency operations during an emergency. • Prepares and maintains an emergency action plan • Provides community training and information The position requires: • Knowledge of emergency management programs and requirements at all level of government, hazard mitigation, hazardous materials and community right to know laws. • Experience commanding disaster and crisis situations. • Ability to operate communications equipment, work as a team, and communicate well both verbally and in writing. • Ability to respond on a 24 hour, 7 day per week basis — on short notice, in the even of a disaster situation and be able to attend meetings and /or training during the day, evenings, and occasional weekends. RECOMMENDATION: Review Mayoral appointment of Tim Butler for discussion and possible ratification by the City Council. Personnel Data on Applicants for Employment: The following personnel data are considered public data: 1. veteran status 2. test scores 3. rank and eligibility 4. job history 5. education and training 6. work availability 7. name considered private data except when certified as eligible for an appointment to a vacancy and considered as one of the "finalists." Tim Butler Bachelor of Science in Marine Science State - certified Firefighter, FEMA and State - certified Emergency Manager, EMT, EMD, Instructor for MN Incident Command System Currently in the Coast Guard Reserves as a Commander in the new Department of Homeland Security. Also served nine years in the active duty Coast Guard and was a commissioned officer and federal law enforcement officer during this time. From 1997 to present served in the US Guard Transportation Command as senior duty officer and liaison officer to US Combatant Commanders. Currently is the Emergency Communications Manager of St. Paul Police /Fire/EMS/ Emergency Management 911 Dispatch Center (since 1999). From 1990 -- 1999 was Fire Communications Chief, St. Paul Fire Department overseeing Fire /EMS /Emergency Management Dispatch before it was merged with Police Dispatch. Served as Deputy Director of Emergency Management for St. Paul 1993 -1999. f 5 APR "c 2 2603 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Mana FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director DATE: April 22, 2003 for the May 1e' SUBJECT: Boy Scout Troop I received a request from Peter Fischer to have two or three Boy Scouts attend the May 12 City Council meeting and make a brief presentation. Mr. Fischer is the citizenship merit badge counselor and the young men are representing Troop 187. As part of the citizenship merit badge, they need to speak to the City Council. It is my request that Boy Scout Troop 187 and Peter Fischer be placed on the May 12 agenda for a brief presentation. If you have any questions, contact me directly at ext. 4573. kftoyscouttroop 187. mem c: Peter Fischer AGENDA NO. G -1 AGENDA REPORT Action by Council j TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director �- Date Endorsed RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Modified DATE: May 6, 2003 Rejected ,.1 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $415,121.05 $133,776.63 $105,370.00 Checks #60765 thru #60809 dated 4/29/03 thru Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 4/18 thru 4/24/03 Checks #60810 thru #60814 dated 5/1/03 thru $254,390.61 Checks #60815 thru #60865 dated 5/6/03 $266,222.92 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 4/25 thru 5/1/03 $1,,174,881.21 Total Accounts Payable $498,789.09 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 4/25/03 $24,259.23 Payroll Deduction checks #93429 thru #93433 dated 4/25/03 $523,048.32 Total Payroll $1,,697,929.53 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. hu attachments PAFINANCE \W0RD\AGN\ApC14,R 050603.doc 1 vchlist Y Check Register page 1 04/25/2003 10:17:40AM City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount 60765 4/29/2003 00018 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES CELL PHONE 29.59 60766 4/2.9/2003 00111 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC PATROL & BOARDING FEES 4/5 - 4/11 1,012.46 PATROL & BOARDING FEES 4/12 - 4/21 494.39 60767 4/29/2003 00114 ANOKA- HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE TRAINING - 2 170.00 CREDIT - WITHDREW TRAINING -1 -85.00 60768 4/29/2003 02786 CASEY, TIM REIMBURSE FOR EMT NATL TEST FEE 20.00 60769 4/29/2003 00412 DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES DEPT TEAM BUILDING RETREAT 4,627.68 60770 4/29/2003 00426 DUELLMAN, KIRK REIMBURSE FOR EMT NATL TEST FEE 20.00 60771 4/29/2003 00519 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO. RODS WITH COUPLING & PARTS 10502.34 60772 4/29/2003 00520 FLOR, TIMOTHY W 'REIMBURSE MEALS 3/31 - 4/4 28.94 60773 4/29/2003 02460 FVN & HTC INC DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SRVS - 4TH QTR 4,000.00 60774 4/29/2003 00543 GE CAPITAL LEASE FOR RICOH COPLER 293.94 60775 4/29/2003 00589 GRAF, DAVE KARATE INSTRUCTOR - SPRING 91.00 60776 4/29/2003 00612 GYM WORKS INC REPAIR EQUIPMENT 1,161.37 60777 4/29/2003 00647 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC HUBS 130.46 60778 4/29/2003 02787 KALKA, THOMAS M REIMBURSE FOR EMT NATL TEST FEE ' 20.00 60779 4/29/2003 02785 LAW ENFORCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES CAREER FAIR FEE 325.00 60780 4/29/2003 02336 M A TAYLOR INC FITNESS CONSULTANT FEE -1ST QTR 1,550'.00 60781 4/29/2003 00908 M R P A 6 SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTRATIONS 2,140.00 60782 4/29/2003 00942 MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE CO EMERGENCY CLEAN UP - SEWER BAC 372.75 60783 ; 4/29/2003 00950 MAWP ANNUAL CONFERENCE SPONSORSHIP 25.00 60784 4/29/2003 01088 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY NPDES PERMIT FEE - PROJ 02 -10 240.00 NPES PERMIT FEE - PROJ 03 -02 240.00 60785 4/29/2003 01149 NATURAL RESOURCES RESTOR INC NATURE CENTER WOODLAND BURN 4 1,700.00 60786 4/29/2003 00395 NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF PUMP BACK PACKS 295.76 60787 4/29/2003 01126 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 612001 PERA LIFE INS (P /R DEDUCTED IN APR) 261.00 60788 4/29/2003 02175 NIVEN, AMY REIMBURSE MILEAGE 4/17 TO 4/22 8.03 60789 4/29/2003 01202 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC RUBBISH HAULER FLYER 514.00 SUMMER FUN SCHOOL BROCHURE 2,476.13 60790 4/29/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF APPLE VALLEY - GROUP 217.56 60791 4/29/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF HEIDE ROUGHT - SWIM LESSONS 42.00 60792 4/29/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF SAMUEL DANNA - SOFTBALL 35.00 60793 4/29/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF SUSAN POWERS - SWIM LESSONS 30.00 60794 4/29/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF NE FAMILY YMCA - NC FEE 27.00 60795 4/29/2003 00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF INTOXILIZER TRAINING 200.00 60796 4/29/2003 02249 QWEST GOVERNMENT SRVS INC E911 MAINT -APR 587.00 60797 4/29/2003 01340 REGIONS HOSPITAL PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES - MAR 1,298.17 60798 4/29/2003 02784 SOHM, DAVID TACTICAL FLASHLIGHT 50.00 60799 4/29/2003 01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF CRIME LAB FEES - MAR 180.00 60800 4/29/2003 01557 SUPERIOR FORD 2003 FORD SQUAD CARS 21,019.00 2003 FORD SQUAD CARS 20,736.00 2003 FORD SQUAD CARS 20,736.00 2003 FORD SQUAD CARS 20,736.00 2003 FORD SQUAD CARS 20,736.00 60801 4/29/2003 02621 SUTLER'S INC MCC JACK DANIELS EVENT - 4/1 3,360.00 60802 4/29/2003 01564 SUZANNE'S CUISINE, INC. MCC JACK DANIELS EVENT 4/1 2,525.00 60803 4/29/2003 01566 SVENDSEN, RON REIMBURSE FOR EMT NATL TEST FEE 20.00 60804 4/29/2003 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC PROJ 00 -05 FINAL PYMT & CHG ORDER 99,629.82 PROJ 00 -04 FINAL PYMT & CHG ORDER 167,990.78 60805 4/29/2003 01580 TSE, INC. JANITORIAL SRVS 2/20 - 3/19 1,054.35 60806 4/29/2003 01669 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE 79 . 88 TOW FORFEITURE VEHICLE 156.30 60807 4/29/2003 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC TELEVISE MAIN LINE 185.00 , TELEVISE MAIN LINE 185.00 vchlist Check Register Page: 2 04/95/2003, 10:17 :40AM City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount 60807 4/29/2003 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC (Continued) TELEVISE MAIN LINE 230.00 TELEVISE MAIN LINE 170.00 TELEVISE MAIN LINE 430.00 TELEVISE MAIN LINE 195.00 60808 4/29/2003 01683 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC UNIFORM 72.75 UNIFORMS 63.50 UNIFORM 213.50 60809 4/29/2003 01798 YOCUM OIL CO. UNLEADED MID -GRADE (89 OCTANE) G 8,265.60 45 Checks in this report Total checks: 415,121.05 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description Amount 04/17/03 04/18/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 8 04/10/03 04/18/03 MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax 10,493.00 04/17/03 04/18/03 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 1 04/18/03 04/21/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 10 04/17/03 04/21/03 DCRP /Flex account DCRP & Flex plan payments 486.49 04/21/03 04/22/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 17 04/09/03 04/22/03 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax 459.00 04/22/03 04/23/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 14,989.10 04/23/03 04/24/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 13,780.31 04/23/03 04/24/03 Pitney Bowes Postage 3 04/18/03 04/24/03 Elan Financial Services* Purchasing card items 53 TOTAL 133,776.63 *Detailed listings of Elan purchasing card items are attached. Transaction Review 4/14/2003 r T For Transactions posted between 04/05/2003 to 04/12/2003 Tran Date Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 1 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 ATC VERIZONWIRELESSWR $31.12 BRUCE K ANDERSON 2 04/08/2003 04/10/2003 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $92.95 SCOTT A ANDREWS 3 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 JOANN ETC # 1970 $132.64 MANDY ANZALDI 4 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 TCT M &N INTERNATIONAL $37.06 MANDY ANZALDI 5 04/08/2003 04/10/2003 MICHAELS #2744 $30.04 MANDY ANZALDI 6 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 FACTORY CARD OUTLET #284 $12.96 MANDY ANZALDI 7 03/13/2003 04/08/2003 RAY DAVIS & SONS LOCKS $781.25 JIM BEHAN 8 03/13/2003 04/08/2003 RAY DAVIS & SONS LOCKS $335.98 JIM BEHAN 9 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 VERIZONWIRELESSWR $33.83 JIM BEHAN 10 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISIN $427.61 TERRIE CARLSON 11 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 FRANKS 00501759 $66.53 MELINDA COLEMAN 12 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 ROSEVILLE AREA SCHOOLS CO $99.00 MELINDA COLEMAN 13 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 ACTIVE.COM STORES $141.90 LINDA CROSSON 14 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 AMAZON.COM SUPERSTOR $17.99 LINDA CROSSON 15 04/05/2003 04/07/2003 SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL $30.00 ROBERTA DARST 16 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 CUB FOODS, INC. $11.29 ROBERTA DARST 17 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $44.62 JOHN DUCHARME 18 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $325.68 TOM EASTMAN 19 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $404.64 TOM EASTMAN 20 04/08/2003 04/10/2003 PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISIN $565.16 TOM EASTMAN 21 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 WASTE MGMT - MPLS $1 TOM EASTMAN 22 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 MENARDS MAPLEWOOD $216.91 DOUG EDGE 23 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 GAL DYNAMED CATALOG $732.70 PAUL E EVERSON 24 04/01/2003 04/08/2003 B W A $510.00 DAVID FISHER 25 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 WWW.CIRCUITCITY.COM $156.49 MYCHAL FOWLDS 26 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 WWW.CIRCUITCITY.COM $111.79 MYCHAL FOWLDS 27 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 BEST BUY 00000109 $74.54 MYCHAL FOWLDS 28 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $127.48 VIRGINIA GAYNOR 29 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 TARGET 00011858 $25.32 CAROLE GERNES 30 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 STREAMLINE DESIGN $648.00 MIKE GRAF 31 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 CUB FOODS, INC. $63.79 MIKE GRAF 32 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 WEBER & TROSETH INC $97.95 MIKE GRAF 33 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $21.94 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 34 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 KNOWLAN'S SPRMKT. #2 $4.00 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 35 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 REMAP INC $50.00 KAREN E GUILFOILE 36 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 WALGREEN 00016873 $83.99 JODI HALWEG 37 04/08/2003 04/10/2003 B & H PHOTO - VIDEO -MO/TO $498.10 LORI HANSON 38 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 KOHL'S #0052 $59.99 STEPHEN J HEINZ 39 04/06/2003 04/07/2003 IVENUE.COM $49.99 HEIDI HERSOM 40 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 SUN TURF $167.74 GARY HINNENKAMP 41 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 CAPITOL COMMUNICATION $26.96 RON HORWATH 42 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 TARGET 00011858 $31.82 DAVID JAHN 43 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES $339.85 MICHAEL KANE 44 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS #802 $1 MICHAEL KANE 45 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 SPRI PRODUCTS $170.70 MARY B KOEHNEN 46 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 SPRI PRODUCTS $170.70 MARY B KOEHNEN 47 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 TARGET 00011858 $14.79 MARY B KOEHNEN 48 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 TARGET 00011858 $44.64 MARY B KOEHNEN 49 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 VERIZONWIRELESSWR $39.39 SHERYL L LE 50 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 DALCO $9.73 MICHAEL LIDBERG 51 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $94.61 DENNIS LINDORFF 52 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO $770.08 DENNIS LINDORFF 53 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 OXYGEN SERVICE CO INC $75.79 DENNIS LINDORFF 54 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT $106.49 DENNIS LINDORFF 55 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPJN $54.75 STEVE LUKIN 56 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $165.87 STEVE LUKIN 57 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES $328.36 MARK MARUSKA 58 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 DAVIS LOCK AND SAFE $36.42 MARK MARUSKA 59 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $452.09 MARK MARUSKA 60 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 THREE RIVERS PARK $60.00 JEAN NELSON 5 61 04/02/2003 04/07/2003 LAKE ELMO INN $136.38 JEAN NELSON 62 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $11.15 JEAN NELSON 63 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $223.36 AMY NIVEN 64 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $412.72 AMY NIVEN 65 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $180.84 AMY NIVEN 66 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 REMAP INC $50.00 DENNIS PECK 67 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 RADIO SHACK 00199265 $74.53 PHILIP F POWELL 68 04/08/2003 04/10/2003 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $28.94 PHILIP F POWELL 69 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 BEST BUY 00000158 $85.18 PHILIP F POWELL 70 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTE $207.90 PHILIP F POWELL 71 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 CUB FOODS, INC. $63.77 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 72 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES LOC $93.72 STEVEN PRIEM 73 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS $304.00 STEVEN PRIEM 74 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 TOUSLEY FORD I27200039 $37.80 STEVEN PRIEM 75 04/08/2003 04/10/2003 SUNRAY BTB $43.93 STEVEN PRIEM 76 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 KATH AUTO PARTS $33.43 STEVEN PRIEM 77 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 PARTS ASSOCIATES INC $16.41 STEVEN PRIEM 78 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 GENERATOR SPECIALTY CO $177.95 STEVEN PRIEM 79 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 JERRYS SPORT CENTER INC $608.34 KEVIN RABBETT 80 04/04/2003 04/10/2003 DALCO 01 OF 01 $1,196.50 MICHAEL REILLY 81 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $19.94 MICHAEL REILLY 82 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 CUB FOODS, INC. $38.30 AUDRA ROBBINS 83 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 THEATRE HOUSE $93.55 AUDRA ROBBINS 84 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 OXYGEN SERVICE CO INC $67.61 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 85 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 ROCKLER WOODWRKNG #13 $39.34 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 86 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 S ST PAUL STEEL SPLY $1 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 87 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 MENARDS OAKDALE $39.94 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 88 04/06/2003 04/08/2003 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $45.39 PAUL SCHLINGMAN 89 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $752.04 PAUL SCHLINGMAN 90 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $643.67 PAUL SCHLINGMAN 91 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $259.59 PAUL SCHLINGMAN 92 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $241.07 PAUL SCHLINGMAN 93 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $368.10 PAUL SCHLINGMAN 94 04/06/2003 04/07/2003 GOODIN COMPANY $18.90 SCOTT SCHULTZ 95 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 G & K SERVICES 006 $251.26 GERALD SEEGER ' 96 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $157.00 MICHAEL P SHORTREED 97 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 JOHNSON DIVERSIFIED PROD $56.56 ANDREA SINDT 98 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 T- MOBILE $24.91 ANDREA SINDT 99 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $74.08 ANDREA SINDT 100 04/09/2003 04/10/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS ($34.31) ANDREA SINDT 101 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISIN $103.80 SCOTT STEFFEN 102 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 PRECISION BUSINESS SYS $236.32 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 103 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 NORM'S TIRE SALES00 OF 00 $37.50 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 104 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES COMPA $1 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 105 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 ANOKA- HENNEPIN TECHNICAL $170.00 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 106 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 EDEN PRAIRIE TUITION OFFI $1 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 107 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $67.25 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 108 04/10/2003 04/11/2003 VFIS -CETS $10.00 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 109 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 VIKING ELECTRIC ST PAUL $22.86 LYLE SWANSON 110 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 VIKING ELECTRIC ST PAUL $12.97 LYLE SWANSON 111 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $408.72 LYLE SWANSON 112 04/07/2003 04/09/2003 HEARTLAND SERVICES INC $466.64 DAVID J THOMALLA 113 04/06/2003 04/07/2003 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS $57.51 HOLLY URBANSKI 114 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 QWEST COMMUNICAT R54 $86.27 HOLLY URBANSKI 115 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 QWEST COMMUNICAT R54 $86.27 HOLLY URBANSKI 116 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 QWEST COMMUNICAT R54 $86.27 HOLLY URBANSKI 117 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 QWEST COMMUNICAT R54 $138.45 HOLLY URBANSKI 118 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 QWEST COMMUNICAT R54 $115.02 HOLLY URBANSKI 119 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $412.84 HOLLY URBANSKI 120 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS $57.51 HOLLY URBANSKI 121 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS $86.27 HOLLY URBANSKI 122 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS $237.67 HOLLY URBANSKI 123 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS $346.67 HOLLY URBANSKI 124 04/09/2003 04/11/2003 MINUTEMAN PRESS $414.69 HOLLY URBANSKI 125 04/04/2003 04/07/2003 PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTI $17.33 SUSAN ZWIEG 29,585.30 C� Transaction Review For Transactions posted between 04/13/2003 to 04/19/2003 Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 04/14/2003 U OF M CCE ON LINE $150.00 R CHARLES AHL 04/17/2003 VERIZONWIRELESSWR $59.94 R CHARLES AHL 04/14/2003 LOFFLER COMPANIES0I OF 01 $243.89 BRUCE K ANDERSON 04/14/2003 LOFFLER COMPANIESOI OF 01 $237.50 BRUCE K ANDERSON 04/15/2003 TGI FRIDAYS #0260 $10.41 JOHN BANICK 04/18/2003 BEST WESTERN HOTELS -KELLY $163.52 JOHN BANICK 04/14/2003 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $7.81 JIM BEHAN 04/14/2003 MENARDS WEST ST PAUL $17.02 JIM BEHAN 04/14/2003 PARK SUPPLY INC $75.14 JIM BEHAN 04/14/2003 PAIN ENTERPRISES INC. $382.40 JIM BEHAN 04/14/2003 AQUA LOGIC INC $213.09 JIM BEHAN 04/14/2003 RYAN PLUMBING & HEATING $258.50 JIM BEHAN 04/17/2003 AIR FILTERS UNLIMITED $555.73 JIM BEHAN 04/17/2003 RIVERSIDE MARKET $18.23 OAKLEY BIESANZ 04/18/2003 ACORN NATURALISTS -INTE $73.37 OAKLEY BIESANZ 04/18/2003 COUNTERFEITDETECTIONEQUI $55.58 JOHN C BOHL 04/16/2003 OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER $126.74 TROY BRINK 04/14/2003 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSP $288.00 TERRIE CARLSON 04/14/2003 SLUMBERLAND #8 $53.24 MELINDA COLEMAN 04/17/2003 ROSEVILLE AREA SCHOOLS CO ($99.00) MELINDA COLEMAN 04/18/2003 DR ALAN ZRVl?vIERMAN00 OF 00 $1,145.00 MELINDA COLEMAN 04/16/2003 ANDON INC. $55.38 LINDA CROS SON 04/14/2003 GIUSEPPE'S PIZZA $62.10 ROBERTA DARST 04/14/2003 BLANKS U.S.A. ($215.72) ROBERTA DARST 04/14/2003 BLANKS U.S.A. $10.71 ROBERTA DARST 04/14/2003 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $32.50 RICHARD N DOBLAR 04/14/2003 CUB FOODS, INC. $36.42 ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL 04/14/2003 GEORGES SHOE REPAIR #2 $95.53 PAUL E EVERSON 04/14/2003 HOTEL ALLEGRO $22.43 DANIEL F FAUST 04/15/2003 GENERAL LOT 20002002 $36.00 DANIEL F FAUST 04/14/2003 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT IN $197.03 RONALD FREBERG 04/14/2003 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT IN $683.52 RONALD FREBERG 04/18/2003 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT IN ($683.52) RONALD FREBERG 04/14/2003 BLANKS U.S.A. $205.01 PATRICIA FRY 04/16/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $16.61 PATRICIA FRY 04/17/2003 BEST BUY 00000109 $319.49 RICHARD FURSMAN 04/14/2003 RD J SPECIALTIES $755.31 CLARENCE GERVAIS 04/14/2003 GOPHER SPORT $104.67 MIKE GRAF 04/14/2003 TARGET 00011858 $6.13 MIKE GRAF 04/16/2003 STREAMLINE DESIGN $550.00 MIKE GRAF 04/14/2003 OFFICE MAX 00007054 $171.43 LORI HANSON 04/18/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $158.53 LORI HANSON 04/16/2003 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $97.50 STEPHEN J HEINZ 04/14/2003 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GRP $350.49 HEIDI HERSOM 04/15/2003 FUN EXPRESS $53.95 HEIDI HERSOM 04/16/2003 KINKO'S #0617 $131.26 HEIDI HERSOM 04/16/2003 KINKO'S #0617 $32.37 HEIDI HERSOM 04/14/2003 SUN TURF $335.48 GARY HINNENKAMP 04/17/2003 SUN TURF $129.33 GARY HINNENKAMP 04/14/2003 NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS $58.61 STEVE HURLEY 04/17/2003 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. $218.64 STEVE HURLEY 04/18/2003 CABLING SERVICES CORPORAT 1 $1,648.60 STEVE HURLEY 04/14/2003 NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS $35.82 ANN E HUTCHINSON 04/15/2003 WALGREEN 00031229 $5.07 ANN E HUTCHINSON 04/17/2003 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS ($269.10) ANN E HUTCHINSON 04/14/2003 RAY ALLEN MFG CO INC $22.40 DAVID KVAM 04/14/2003 HYATT HOTELS NEWPORTER $1,185.10 SHERYL L LE 04/14/2003 HYATT HOTELS F/B $11.14 SHERYL L LE 04/16/2003 BARNA,GUZY & STEFFEN,LTD $1,618.50 SHERYL L LE 7 04/14/2003 DALCO $9.73 MICHAEL LIDBERG 04�14/2003 DALCO $9.73 MICHAEL LIDBERG 04/14/2003 DALCO $9.73 MICHAEL LIDBERG 04/14/2003 FIREHOUSE SUBSCRI01 OF 01 $52.00 MICHAEL LIDBERG 04/18/2003 MENARDS OAKDALE $234.17 DENNIS LINDORFF 04/14/2003 NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS $768.62 STEVE LUKIN 04/16/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $165.87 STEVE LUKIN 04/16/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $23.43 STEVE LUKIN 04/17/2003 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT CO $143.93 STEVE LUKIN 04/14/2003 VIKING ELECTRIC ST PAUL $637.45 MARK MARUSKA 04/15/2003 SUN TURF $218.33 MARK MARUSKA 04/14/2003 CENTURY COLLEGE CONTINUIN $327.00 JON A MELANDER 04/18/2003 CENTURY COLLEGE CONTINUIN $380.00 JON A MELANDER 04/18/2003 LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE $95.00 JON A MELANDER 04/15/2003 MENARDS MAPLEWOOD $46.30 BRYAN NAGEL 04/16/2003 MENARDS MAPLEWOOD $10.96 BRYAN NAGEL 04/17/2003 SPRINTPCS AUTOPYMT RC 1 $56.86 BRYAN NAGEL 04/17/2003 MENARDS 3059 MAPLEWOOD ($46.30) BRYAN NAGEL 04/15/2003 KOHL'S #0052 $109.77 STEVEN PALMA 04/14/2003 OLYMPUS AMERICA $63.11 PHILIP F POWELL 04/16/2003 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $18.90 PHILIP F POWELL 04/17/2003 OFFICE MAX 00007054 .$159.73 PHILIP F POWELL 04/17/2003 STREICHER'S POLICE EQP $223.49 PHILIP F POWELL 04/14/2003 CUB FOODS, INC. $51.72 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 04/14/2003 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $191.27 STEVEN PRIEM 04/14/2003 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 ($191.27) STEVEN PRIEM 04/14/2003 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039 $24.20 STEVEN PRIEM 04/14/2003 KATH AUTO PARTS $48.94 STEVEN PRIEM 04/14/2003 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC $1,096.95 STEVEN PRIEM 04/14/2003 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC $913.24 STEVEN PRIEM 04/15/2003 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS $185.58 STEVEN PRIEM 04/16/2003 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS $105.05 STEVEN PRIEM 04/17/2003 SUNRAY BTB $46.64 STEVEN PRIEM 04/18/2003 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT IN $683.52 STEVEN PRIEM 04/18/2003 KATH AUTO PARTS $23.36 STEVEN PRIEM 04/14/2003 NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS $1,099.83 KEVIN RABBETT 04/17/2003 BMC BEN MEADOWS CO $269.59 KEVIN RABBETT 04/14/2003 THEATRE HOUSE $47.10 AUDRA ROBBINS 04/18/2003 TARGET 00000687 $16.15 AUDRA ROBBINS 04/14/2003 A WORLD OF FISH #1 $274.76 RUSSELL L SCHMIDT 04/14/2003 ARAMARK REF SVS #6013- $332.00 RUSSELL L SCHMIDT 04/16/2003 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS $90.82 ANDREA SINDT 04/18/2003 NATIONAL RECREATION AND P $30.00 PAULINE STAPLES 04/16/2003 TRI -TECH INC $92.06 SCOTT STEFFEN 04/14/2003 HIRSHFIELD'S MAPLEWOOD $21.28 LYLE SWANSON 04/16/2003 DAVIS LOCK AND SAFE $19.48 LYLE SWANSON 04/17/2003 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC $212.00 LYLE SWANSON 04/16/2003 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $97.50 DAVID J THOMALLA 04/14/2003 CURTIS 1000 $1,460.76 HOLLY URBANSKI 04/14/2003 U OF M- CCE $45.00 CHARLES J VERMEERSCH 04/14/2003 NEW LIFE INDUSTRIES INC $341.00 SUSAN ZWIEG 23,667.17 E:] a vchllst Check Register :Page: 1 05102/2003 10:43:53AM City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount 60810 5/1/2003 00644 HEALTHPARTNERS MONTHLY PREMIUM 1,155.74 60811 5/1/2003 02207 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MN MONTHLY PREMIUM 7,920.80 60812 5/1/2003 01085 MN LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY PREMIUM 3,341.80 .60813 5/1/2003 00966 MEDICA CHOICE MONTHLY PREMIUM 90,054.37 60814 5/1/2003 02203 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LTD - MONTHLY PREMIUM 2,897.36 60815 5/6/2003 00071 ALL GOALS INC STEEL SOCCER GOALS & NET 1,257.77 STEEL SOCCER GOALS & NET 994.71 60816 5/6/2003 00152 BANICK, JOHN REIMB FOR MEALS 4/29 20.00 60817 5/6/2003 00165 BEACON BALLFIELDS 6 - 50# BAGS OF SPARKLE 1,522.60 60818 5/6/2003 00174 BELDE, STAN K -9 HANDLER - MAY 35.00 60819 5/6/2003 01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC MERCH FOR RESALE 312.00 60820 5/6/2003 00198 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS MONTHLY WATER UTIL - 4/21 & 22 BILL 1 783.37 60821 5/6/2003 00202 BOHL, JOHN REIMBURSE FOR MEAL 4/24 17.78 60822 5/6/2003 02472 CAPITAL TITLE CORPORATION SETTLEMENT FEES -OPEN SPACE PURC 1,170.00 60823 5/6/2003 02746 CLOVER SUPER FOODS INC MERCH FOR RESALE 224.55 60824 5/6/2003 00384 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS COPIER COSTS 326.54 60825 5/6/2003 01372 DYNAMEX DELIVERS NOW COURIER TO KPMG 27.90 60826 5/6/2003 02694 ELERT & ASSOCIATES INC NETWORK PHONE SRV - JAN 1,590.00 NETWORK PHONE SRVS - FEB 1,590.00 60827 5/6/2003 00463 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT GROVER AIR HORN KITS 13.93 BATTERIES FOR AMB MEDIC 3 326.40 60828 5/6/2003 00668 HIEBERT, STEVEN REIMBURSE FOR LODGING 3/23 100.00 K -9 HANDLER - MAY 35.00 60829 5/6/2003 00790 KELLER ELECTRIC INC ELEC WORK AT GOODRICH PARK 195.00 60830 5/6/2003 02612 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE REIMBURSE FOR LUNCH - 4/26 CLEAN- 211.63 60831 5/6/2003 00867 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS NC LILLIE SUBURBAN SUBSCRIPTION -1 19.95 60832 5/6/2003 00891 MAMA MAMA LUNCHEON 4/18 18.00 60833 5/6/2003 00932 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 140.25 BIRTHDAY CAKES 91.50 BIRTHDAY CAKES 204.25 EMPL SAFETY TRNG REFRESHMENTS 4 77.49 EMPL SAFETY TRNG REFRESHMENTS 4 23.69 60834 5/6/2003 01819 MCLEOD USA LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 3/16 TO 4/15 4,814.03 60835 5/6/2003 00975 MERIT CHEVROLET TRANSMISSION & CORE EXCHAGE 2,767.94 TRANSMISSION & CORE EXCH 2,679.56 60836 5/6/2003 00977 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY BATTING T'S 1,002.86 60837 5/6/2003 00983 METRO SALES INC COPIER MAINT AGREEMENT - 2ND QTR 306.41 60838 5/6/2003 00985 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER - MAY 181,064.00 60839 5/6/2003 01028 MN STATE TREASURER STAX MONTHLY SURTAX - APR 3,380.19 60840 5/6/2003 01096 MOGREN BROS MULCH 394.05 60841 5/6/2003 01149 NATURAL RESOURCES RESTOR INC PRESCRIBED BURN AT JOY PARK 1,275.00 60842 5/6/2003 01131 NSPAA SR HIGH GIRLS SOFTBALL REGISTRATI( 300.00 60843 5/6/2003 01213 OLSON, JULIE REIMBURSE FOR MEALS & PRKG 4/3 - 4 91.72 60844 5/6/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF LORI ELLINGSON - MEMBERSHIP 63.90 60845 5/6/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF CARLOS MEZA -CEJA - MEMBERSHI 55.00 60846 5/6/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR IREF M SIEBERER - INITIAL MEMBERSHI 10.00 60847 5/6/2003 01254 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY MERCH FOR RESALE 585.75 MERCH FOR RESALE 389.25 60848 5/6/2003 01270 PITNEY BOWES INC SERVICE FOLDING MACHINE 172.00 60849 5/6/2003 01275 POLAR CHEV, GEO, MAZDA 2003 CHEV MALIBU , 4 DR SEDAN MODE 24,753.83 60850 5/6/2003 01360 REINHART FOODSERVICE MERCH FOR RESALE 434.86 MERCH FOR RESALE 399.38 MERCH FOR RESALE 265.23 MERCH FOR RESALE 598.13 vchlist Check Register Page: 2 05/02/2003 10:43:53AM City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount 60850 5/6/2003 01360 REINHART FOODSERVICE (Continued) MERCH FOR RESALE 229.26 FINANCE CHARGE 6.52 FINANCE CHARGE 12.51 60851 5/6/2003 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT MERCH FOR RESALE 368.85 MERCH FOR RESALE 206.38 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 339.23 MERCH FOR RESALE 143.71 MERCH FOR RESALE 139.22 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 320.26 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 58.10 SUPPLIES 124.55 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 248.25 60852 5/6/2003 01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF HYDRANT & WATER USE -1ST QTR 557.43 60853 5/6/2003 01527 STEFFEN, SCOTT REIMBURSE FOR OVRPYMT AT AUCTIO 45.00 60854 5/6/2003 01537 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC. YOUTH CAPS 313.50 60855 5/6/2003 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS NO 30.43 60856 5/6/2003 01578 T.R.F. SUPPLY CO. RAIN SUIT 18.90 60857 5/6/2003 02788 TASK FORCE TIPS INC REPAIR NOZZLE 134.13 60858 5/6/2003 02700 TSI INC RESPIRATOR FIT TESTER MODEL 8020 8,015.15 60859 5/6/2003 01665 TWIN CITY HARDWARE BOLTS 19.30 REPAIR DOORS 344.53 PANIC TRIM 766.80 INSTALL PANIC TRIM 415.35 60860 5/6/2003 02069 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC PROJ 02 -10 TELEVISE MAIN LINE 170.00 PROJ 02 -10 TELEVISE MAIN LINE 170.00 PROD 02 -10 TELEVISE MAIN LINE 170.00 PROJ 02 -10 TELEVISE MAIN LINE 170.00 60861 5/6/2003 01683 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC BULLETPROOF VEST 699.95 60862 5/6/2003 02290 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - STD SHORT -TERM DISABILITY - MAY 1,171.97 60863 5/6/2003 01728 VOYAGEUR ASSET MGMT INC INV MGMT FEE 964.00 60864 5/6/2003 01734 WALSH, WILLIAM P. COMM PLUMBING INSP 578.00 60865 5/6/2003 01750 WATSON CO INC, THE MERCH FOR RESALE 306.93 56 Checks in this report Total checks: 3599760.68 d CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Pavee Description 04/24/03 04/25/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 04/25/03 04/25/03 ICMA (Vantagepointe) Deferred Compensation 04/24/03 04/25/03 DCRP /Flex account DCRP &Flex plan payments 04/24/03 04/25/03 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 04/25/03 04/28/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 04/25/03 04/28/03 P.E.R.A. P.E.R.A. 04/25/03 04/28/03 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 04/28/03 04/29/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 04/25/03 04/29/03 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 04/29/03 04/30/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 04/30/03 05/01/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar TOTAL Amount 14,083.92 7,970.62 75.00 1,111.50 15,434.14 47,231.61 111,194.15 13,786.75 20,497.48 19,203.12 15,634.63 266,222.92 11 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 12 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 04/25/03 COLLINS, KENNETH 357.47 dd 04/25/03 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 357.47 dd 04/25/03 KOPPEN, MARVIN 357.47 dd 04/25/03 DARST, ROBERTA 1,386.79 dd 04/25/03 FURSMAN, RICHARD 4,419.60 dd 04/25/03 SCHLINGMAN, PAUL 2 dd 04/25/03 SEEGER, GERALD 488.85 dd 04/25/03 SWANSON, LYLE 1 dd 04/25/03 CARLSON, THERESE 2 dd 04/25/03 LE, SHERYL 3,592.64 dd 04/25/03 FAUST, DANIEL 3,745.90 dd 04/25/03 URBANSKI, HOLLY 1,661.46 dd 04/25/03 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,157.00 dd 04/25/03 BAUMAN, GAYLE 2,75 8.75 dd 04/25/03 JACKSON, MARY 1,715.85 dd 04/25/03 KELSEY, CONNIE 940.46 dd 04/25/03 TETZLAFF, JUDY 103.06 dd 04/25/03 FRY, PATRICIA 1,606.65 dd 04/25/03 GUILFOILE, KAREN 2,546.16 dd 04/25/03 OSTER, ANDREA 1,663.75 dd 04/25/03 CAROE, JEANETTE 1, 5 94.93 dd 04/25/03 JAGOE, CAROL 1,550.65 dd 04/25/03 JOHNSON, BONNIE 970.98 dd 04/25/03 - - OLSON, SANDRA 1 dd 04/25/03 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,575.86 dd 04/25/03 BANICK, JOHN 3,201.24 dd 04/25/03 CORCORAN, THERESA 1 dd 04/25/03 MARTINSON, CAROL 1,538.95 dd 04/25/03 POWELL, PHILIP 1 dd 04/25/03 THOMALLA, DAVID 3 dd 04/25/03 ABEL, CLINT 1 dd 04/25/03 ALDRIDGE, MARK 2,218.78 dd 04/25/03 ANDREWS, SCOTT 3,038.96 dd 04/25/03 BAKKE, LONN 2,227.36 dd 04/25/03 BELDE, STANLEY 2 dd 04/25/03 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 1 dd 04/25/03 BOHL, JOHN 2,386.29 dd 04/25/03 BUSACK, DANIEL 2,115.21 dd 04/25/03 COFFEY, KEVIN 1,573.44 dd 04/25/03 DOBLAR, RICHARD 2,128.16 dd 04/25/03 HALWEG, KEVIN 3 dd 04/25/03 HEINZ, STEPHEN 2,301.63 dd 04/25/03 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2,636.83 dd 04/25/03 JOHNSON, KEVIN 3,450.24 12 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 13 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 04/25/03 KARIS, FLINT 2 dd 04/25/03 KONG, TOMMY 2,065.35 dd 04/25/03 KROLL, BRETT 1,778.59 dd 04/25/03 KVAM, DAVID 2,737.93 dd 04/25/03 LARSON, DANIEL 2 dd 04/25/03 LU, JOHNNIE 2,021.66 dd 04/25/03 MARINO, JASON 1,700.93 dd 04/25/03 MARTIN, JERROLD 2,275.05 dd 04/25/03 METRY, ALESIA 1,700.93 dd 04/25/03 OLSON, JULIE 2 dd 04/25/03 PALMA, STEVEN 2,898.97 dd 04/25/03 PIKE, GARY 2,177.35 dd 04/25/03 RABBETT, KEVIN 2 dd 04/25/03 STEFFEN, SCOTT 4 dd 04/25/03 STOCKTON, DERRELL 2 dd 04/25/03 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2 dd 04/25/03 THIENES, PAUL 2 dd 04/25/03 TRAN, JOSEPH 2,312.35 dd 04/25/03 WENZEL, JAY 2 dd 04/25/03 XIONG, KAO 1 5 700.93 dd 04/25/03 BARTZ, PAUL 2 dd 04/25/03 BERGERON, JOSEPH 2,798.52 dd 04/25/03 GROTTY, KERRY 2 dd 04/25/03 DUGAS, MICHAEL 1 9 977.83 dd 04/25/03 DUNN, ALICE 3 dd 04/25/03 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2,384.48 dd 04/25/03 EVERSON, PAUL 2,305.37 dd 04/25/03 FLOR, TIMOTHY 3 dd 04/25/03 FRASER, JOHN 2,448.25 dd 04/25/03 HALWEG, JODI 1,888.38 dd 04/25/03 KATZMAN, BARBARA 1 9 565.25 dd 04/25/03 MORNING, TIMOTHY 169.10 dd 04/25/03 PARSONS, KURT 1,761.68 dd 04/25/03 ROSSMAN, DAVID 2 dd 04/25/03 BECKER, SHANE 1,290.00 dd 04/25/03 CHRISTENSEN, CHARLES 1 9 329.60 dd 04/25/03 DAWSON, RICHARD 1,628.85 dd 04/25/03 DUELLMAN, KIRK 1,628.85 dd 04/25/03 FITZGERALD, EDWARD 748.00 dd 04/25/03 GRILL, CARL 856.80 dd 04/25/03 HEMQUIST, MICHAEL 2,395.60 dd 04/25/03 HJELLE, ERIK 1 9 265.20 dd 04/25/03 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 1 5 628.85 dd 04/25/03 KUSKEY, JOSEPH 784.00 dd 04/25/03 MELANDER, BOBBIE 40.80 dd 04/25/03 MELANDER, SCOTT 448.80 13 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 14 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 04/25/03 NOVAK, JEROME 1,628.85 dd 04/25/03 PETERSON, MARK 73 9.60 dd 04/25/03 PETERSON, ROBERT 1,705.85 dd 04/25/03 ROBERTSON, STEVEN 1 dd 04/25/03 SVENDSEN, RONALD 1,628.85 dd 04/25/03 GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE 2,422.27 dd 04/25/03 BOYER, SCOTT 1,756.65 dd 04/25/03 FEHR, JOSEPH 2,463.29 dd 04/25/03 FLAUGHER, JAYME 1 dd 04/25/03 JACKSON, LINDA 221.00 dd 04/25/03 LAFFERTY, WALTER 1,756.65 dd 04/25/03 LINN, BRYAN 1 dd 04/25/03 PACOLT, MARSHA 1,999.85 dd 04/25/03 RABINE, JANET 1,917.25 dd 04/25/03 SCHAULS, ADAM 85.00 dd 04/25/03 STAHNKE, JULIE 21077.85 dd 04/25/03 LUKIN, STEVEN 3 dd 04/25/03 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN 2,487.66 dd 04/25/03 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1,805.52 dd 04/25/03 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 268.49 dd 04/25/03 AHL, R. CHARLES 3 dd 04/25/03 NIVEN, AMY' 1,083.48 dd 04/25/03 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2 dd 04/25/03 WEGWERTH, JUDITH 1,787.38 dd 04/25/03 BRINK, TROY 1 dd 04/25/03 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 1 dd 04/25/03 EDGE, DOUGLAS 1 dd 04/25/03 KANE, MICHAEL 2,643.39 dd 04/25/03 LUTZ, DAVID 1,768.86 dd 04/25/03 MEYER, GERALD 1 dd 04/25/03 NAGEL, BRYAN 1 dd 04/25/03 OSWALD, ER.ICK 1,906.15 dd 04/25/03 TEVLIN, TODD 1 dd 04/25/03 BOHMBACH, JOSHUA 152.10 dd 04/25/03 CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER 2,967.22 dd 04/25/03 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,124.65 dd 04/25/03 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2 dd 04/25/03 PECK, DENNIS 2 dd 04/25/03 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 3,594.80 dd 04/25/03 SCHACHT, ERIN 2,483.59 dd 04/25/03 TATE, FRANK 1,589.55 dd 04/25/03 VERMEERSCH, CHARLES 1,912.65 dd 04/25/03 ANDERSON, BRUCE 3 dd 04/25/03 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN 1 dd 04/25/03 HERSOM, HEIDI 1,756.65 dd 04/25/03 MARUSKA, MARK 2 14 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 15 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 04/25/03 NAUGHTON, JOHN 1 dd 04/25/03 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1,734.25 dd 04/25/03 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1 dd 04/25/03 HAYMAN, JANET 1,146.26 dd 04/25/03 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2 dd 04/25/03 KOS, HEATHER 481.00 dd 04/25/03 NELSON, JEAN 997.94 dd 04/25/03 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 1,792.65 dd 04/25/03 COLEMAN, MELINDA 3 dd 04/25/03 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 2 dd 04/25/03 KROLL, LISA 1,016.20 dd 04/25/03 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 923.37 dd 04/25/03 SINDT, ANDREA 1 dd 04/25/03 THOMPSON, DEBRA 608.74 dd 04/25/03 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,278.25 dd 04/25/03 BERGO, CHAD 1,933.93 dd 04/25/03 FINWALL, SHANN 1,904.26 dd 04/25/03 ROBERTS, KENNETH 2,378.80 dd 04/25/03 CARVER, NICHOLAS 2,346.15 dd 04/25/03 FISHER, DAVID 2 dd 04/25/03 SUNDE, JOEL 864.50 dd 04/25/03 SWAN, DAVID 1 dd 04/25/03 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 2 dd 04/25/03 ANZALDI, MANDY 889.00 dd 04/25/03 BJORK, ALICIA 21.75 dd 04/25/03 FINN, GREGORY 1,776.22 dd 04/25/03 FLUG, ELAINE 95.00 dd 04/25/03 GRAF, MICHAEL 1,678.82 dd 04/25/03 KELLY, LISA 1,245.78 dd 04/25/03 KURYSH, MICHELE 22.50 dd 04/25/03 ROBBINS, AUDRA 1,648.82 dd 04/25/03 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 2 dd 04/25/03 BREHEIM, ROGER 1 dd 04/25/03 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 1 dd 04/25/03 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 1 dd 04/25/03 CROSSON, LINDA 2,162.18 dd 04/25/03 DIAZ, SUSAN 443.38 dd 04/25/03 EASTMAN, THOMAS 2,345.93 dd 04/25/03 ERICKSON, KYLE 815.12 dd 04/25/03 LEIER, SARA 78.10 dd 04/25/03 PARTLOW, JOSHUA 250.66 dd 04/25/03 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 488.66 dd 04/25/03 SCHMIDT, RUSSELL 1 dd 04/25/03 STAPLES, PAULINE 2,641.74 dd 04/25/03 ABRAHAMSON, DANIEL 45.83 dd 04/25/03 BENDTSEN, LISA 108.00 15 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 16 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 04/25/03 BRENEMAN, NEIL 332.32 dd 04/25/03 COLE, NANCY 144.64. dd 04/25/03 CORNER, AMY 62.40 dd 04/25/03 ERICKSON, CAROL 45.00 dd 04/25/03 FONTAINE, ANTHONY 291.86 dd 04/25/03 GUZIK, JENNIFER 26.00 dd 04/25/03 HALEY, BROOKE 95.88 dd 04/25/03 HORWATH, RONALD 1,648.83 dd 04/25/03 IRISH, KARL 133.38 dd 04/25/03 KOEHNEN, AMY 20.55 dd 04/25/03 KOEHNEN, MARY 578.02 dd 04/25/03 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 341.84 dd 04/25/03 LAWSON, JOSHUA 132.13 dd 04/25/03 MARUSKA, ERICA 152.50 dd 04/25/03 OVERBY, ANNA 36.00 dd 04/25/03 POWERS, JESSICA 40.93 dd 04/25/03 SCHULTZ, PETER 45.50 dd 04/25/03 THOEMKE, MARIE 161.81 dd 04/25/03 GROPPOLI, LINDA 369.75 dd 04/25/03 RENSLOW, RITA 348.98 dd 04/25/03 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 53.20 dd 04/25/03 LONETTI, JAMES 891.28 dd 04/25/03 PATTERSON, ALBERT 1,122.28 dd 04/25/03 PRINS, KELLY 861.87 dd 04/25/03 REILLY, MICHAEL 1 dd 04/25/03 STEINHORST, JEFFREY 379.75 dd 04/25/03 AICHELE, CRAIG 1 dd 04/25/03 PRIEM, STEVEN 1 dd 04/25/03 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 1 dd 04/25/03 HURLEY, STEPHEN 2,687.06 wf 93232 04/25/03 CARDINAL, ROBERT 406.20 wf 93233 04/25/03 WASILUK, JULIE 357.47 wf 93234 04/25/03 INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS 50.00 wf 93235 04/25/03 KARSTENS, BRAD 112.50 wf 93236 04/25/03 JAHN, DAVID 1,501.35 wf 93237 04/25/03 MALDONADO, JUANA 610.37 wf 93238 04/25/03 MORIN, TROY 204.00 wf 93239 04/25/03 MATHEYS, ALANA 1 wf 93240 04/25/03 HANSEN, LORI 1,536.93 wf 93241 04/25/03 VIETOR, LORRAINE 1 Wf 93242 04/25/03 PALANK, MARY 1,536.65 wf 93243 04/25/03 RICHIE, CAROLE 1 wf 93244 04/25/03 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 1 wf 93245 04/25/03 TICHY, PAMELA 96.00 wf 93246 04/25/03 STEINER, JOSEPH 459.00 wf 93247 04/25/03 WELCHLIN, CABOT 2,439.20 16 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT Wf 93248 04/25/03 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 2 Wf 93249 04/25/03 ACOSTA, MARK 816.00 Wf 93250 04/25/03 AMBORN, JASON 1 Wf 93251 04/25/03 ANDERSON, BRIAN 1,402.40 Wf 93252 04/25/03 BAHL, DAVID 1,299.00 Wf 93253 04/25/03 BADMAN, ANDREW 1 M Wf 93254 04/25/03 BOE, ERICK 489.60 Wf 93255 04/25/03 BOURQUIN, RON 1,093.20 Wf 93256 04/25/03 RUCHE, JOETTE 1,946.40 Wf 93257 04/25/03 BUSCH, STEVEN 660.00 Wf 93258 04/25/03 CAHILL, CHRISTOPHER 1 Wf 93259 04/25/03 CAPISTRANT; JOHN 1 Wf 93260 04/25/03 CASEY, TIMOTHY 512.00 Wf 93261 04/25/03 CROMETT, MARK 1,338.00 Wf 93262 04/25/03 DIETZ, EDWARD 1,604.80 Wf 93263 04/25/03 DITTEL, MICHAEL 1,378.80 Wf 93264 04/25/03 DOREE, KURT 687.00 Wf 93265 04/25/03 DUELLMAN, AMY 1 Wf 93266 04/25/03 DUELLMAN, JOSEPH 530.40 Wf 93267 04/25/03 FASULO, WALTER 1,215.60 Wf 93268 04/25/03 FETTERS, JEFFREY 2 Wf 93269 04/25/03 GERARD, JAMIE 1 Wf 93270 04/25/03 HAKSETH, NATHAN 1,288.00 Wf 93271 04/25/03 HALE, JOSEPH 1 Wf 93272 04/25/03 HASKINS, KEVIN 1 wf 93273 04/25/03 HEFFERNAN, PATRICK 1,351.60 Wf 93274 04/25/03 HERLUND, RICK 1,773.20 Wf 93275 04/25/03 HUTCHINSON, JAMES 536.00 Wf 93276 04/25/03 KALKA, THOMAS 920.00 Wf 93277 04/25/03 KANE, ROBERT 1 Wf 93278 04/25/03 KARNOWSKI, SANDRA 2,067.20 Wf 93279 04/25/03 KOEHN, CORY 911.20 Wf 93280 04/25/03 KOLASA, MARK 843.20 Wf 93281 04/25/03 KONDER, RONALD 1 Wf 93282 04/25/03 KORTUS, WILLIAM 612.40 Wf 93283 04/25/03 KUMMER, CORINNE 1 Wf 93284 04/25/03 L'ALLIER, TED 516.80 Wf 93285 04/25/03 LARSON, SHANNON 430.00 Wf 93286 04/25/03 LEDMAN, KEVIN 100.00 Wf 93287 04/25/03 LIDBERG, MICHAEL 875.60 Wf 93288 04/25/03 LINK, BRYAN 571.20 Wf 93289 04/25/03 LOCHEN, MICHAEL 1,759.20 Wf 93290 04/25/03 MALLORY, GORDON 1,729.20 Wf 93291 04/25/03 MARTY, MARK 3,673.60 Wf 93292 04/25/03 MARX, ERIC 176.80 Wf 93293 04/25/03 MCGOVERN, JOHN 1 17 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD iF: CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 93294 04/25/03 MELANDER, JON 2,002.80 wf 93295 04/25/03 MELLEN, RICHARD 1 wf 93296 04/25/03 MEYERS, PAUL 998.00 wf 93297 04/25/03 MILLER, NICHOLAS 1 wf 93298 04/25/03 MONK, JOHN 584.80 wf 93299 04/25/03 NALIPINSKI, STEPHEN 1,202.00 wf 93300 04/25/03 NOLAN, PAUL 1 wf 93301 04/25/03 OLSON, KENNETH 1 wf 93302 04/25/03 PETERSON, THEODORE 1 wf 93303 04/25/03 PLANK, DANIEL 1,364.80 wf 93304 04/25/03 REYNOSO, ANGEL 480.00 wf 93305 04/25/03 RICKETSON, BRENT 190.40 wf 93306 04/25/03 RIDER, JEFFREY L130.00 wf 93307 04/25/03 RINDAL, DONALD 952.00 wf 93308 04/25/03 ROMANIK, JAMES 1,361.20 wf 93309 04/25/03 SACKETT, JAMES 1 wf 93310 04/25/03 SCHADT, JEFFREY 1,170.00 wf 93311 04/25/03 SCHOENECKER, THOMAS 979.20 wf 93312 04/25/03 SCHULTZ, THOMAS 652.80 wf 93313 04/25/03 SEDLACEK, JEFFREY 1,092.80 wf 93314 04/25/03 SEVERSON, DAVID 652.80 wf 93315 04/25/03 SINGER, SCOTT 421.60 wf 93316 04/25/03 SKOK, STEPHEN 1,569.20 wf 93317 04/25/03 SMITH, KEITH 612.00 wf 93318 04/25/03 SMITH, RICHARD 965.60 wf 93319 04/25/03 SOLHEID, DALE 440.00 wf 93320 04/25/03 STELLA, JAMES 808.00 wf 93321 04/25/03 STENE, MARK 1,496.00 wf 93322 04/25/03 TRONNES, JOHN 421.60 wf 93323 04/25/03 WATERS, JOSEPH 1,797.20 wf 93324 04/25/03 WELDON, ROBERT 584.80 wf 93325 04/25/03 WHISLER, MICHAEL 1 wf 93326 04/25/03 WHITE, JOEL 1 wf 93327 04/25/03 WILSON, JASON 81.60 wf 93328 04/25/03 OLINGER, SHELLEY 1,578.25 wf 93329 04/25/03 FREBERG, RONALD 1 wf 93330 04/25/03 JONES, DONALD 1 wf 93331 04/25/03 ELIAS, JAMES 2 wf 93332 04/25/03 EDSON, DAVID 1 wf 93333 04/25/03 HELEY, ROLAND 1 wf 93334 04/25/03 HINNENKAMP, GARY 1,745.05 wf 93335 04/25/03 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1 wf 93336 04/25/03 NOVAK, MICHAEL 1 wf 93337 04/25/03 BERGREN, KIRSTEN 27.50 wf 93338 04/25/03 GERNES, CAROLE 343.75 wf 93339 04/25/03 SOUTTER, CHRISTINE 202.50 iF: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD we CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT Wf 93340 04/25/03 ANZALDI, KALI 236.50 Wf 93341 04/25/03 BOTHWELL, KRISTIN 152.50 Wf 93342 04/25/03 DEGREE, AMANDA 189.13 wf 93343 04/25/03 FRANK, LAURA 308.55 Wf 93344 04/25/03 GOODRICH, CHAD 128.00 Wf 93345 04/25/03 HOIUM, PHILIP 156.00 Wf 93346 04/25/03 NIELSEN, ABBY 17.00 Wf 93347 04/25/03 NIELSEN, ADAM 32.00 Wf 93348 04/25/03 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 244.96 Wf 93349 04/25/03 SHOBERG, KARI 156.00 Wf 93350 04/25/03 SIKORA, JACOB 24.00 Wf 93351 04/25/03 YOUNG, SHAWN 244.50 Wf 93352 04/25/03 GERMAIN, DAVID 1 Wf 93353 04/25/03 HAAG, MARK 1,575.85 Wf 93354 04/25/03 NADEAU, EDWARD 2,643.39 Wf 93355 04/25/03 BEHR, HEATHER 291.10 Wf 93356 04/25/03 BROWN, LAURIE 458.80 Wf 93357 04/25/03 DISKERUD, HEATHER 325.60 Wf 93358 04/25/03 GLASS, JEAN 1 Wf 93359 04/25/03 JACK, NICOLE 205.90 Wf 93360 04/25/03 MOY, PAMELA 419.00 Wf 93361 04/25/03 SHOBERG, CARY 693.58 wf 93362 04/25/03 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 133.20 Wf 93363 04/25/03 UNGER, MARGARET 737.81 Wf 93364 04/25/03 ANDERSON, CALEB 146.25 Wf 93365 04/25/03 BACHMAN, NICOLE 64.80 Wf 93366 04/25/03 CHAPMAN, JENNY 299.75 Wf 93367 04/25/03 COSTA, JOSEPH 122.10 Wf 93368 04/25/03 DEMPSEY, BETH 43.20 Wf 93369 04/25/03 DOTY, JANET 283.91 Wf 93370 04/25/03 DUNK, RYAN 442.17 Wf 93371 04/25/03 FENGER, JUSTIN 582.70 Wf 93372 04/25/03 FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA 53.00 Wf 93373 04/25/03 FINNEGAN, KAREN 108.00 Wf 93374 04/25/03 FONTAINE, KIM 517.37 Wf 93375 04/25/03 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 310.10 Wf 93376 04/25/03 HOLMGREN, LEAH 205.06 Wf 93377 04/25/03 HOULE, DENISE 193.95 Wf 93378 04/25/03 IRISH, GRACE 227.78 Wf 93379 04/25/03 JOHNSON, ROBERT 375.19 Wf 93380 04/25/03 JOVONOVICH, TODD 32.00 Wf 93381 04/25/03 JOYER, MARTI 72.00 Wf 93382 04/25/03 LINDSTROM, AMANDA 138.13 wf 93383 04/25/03 MATHISEN -JR, DEAN 506.25 wf 93384 04/25/03 MCMAHON, MELISSA 134.93 Wf 93385 04/25/03 MELCHER, ROBERT 201.50 we CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf Wf wf Wf CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 93386 04/25/03 MOES, EMILIA 98.60 93387 04/25/03 O'REAGAN, CHRISTINE 25.94 93388 04/25/03 OLSON, MARGRET 20.40 93389 04/25/03 OWEN, JONATHAN 92.50 93390 04/25/03 PALMER, JESSICA 10.00 93391 04/25/03 PEHOSKI, JOEL 115.30 93392 04/25/03 PROESCH, ANDY 210.60 93393 04/25/03 RENSTROM, KEVIN 166.83 93394 04/25/03 SMITLEY, SHARON 270.40 93395 04/25/03 TUPY, HEIDE 112.20 93396 04/25/03 TUPY, MARCUS 242.75 93397 04/25/03 WAGNER, ERIC 83.60 93398 04/25/03 WARNER, CAROLYN 137.20 93399 04/25/03 WEDES, CARYL 151.55 93400 04/25/03 WHITE, NICOLE 151.20 93401 04/25/03 WINEGAR, JILL 18.00 93402 04/25/03 WOODMAN, ALICE 40.00 93403 04/25/03 BOSLEY, CAROL 252.20 93404 04/25/03 BREITBACH, GARY 630.00 93405 04/25/03 ESALA, HOPE 42.25 93406 04/25/03 HAGSTROM, EMILY 24.00 93407 04/25/03 KELLY, MICHAEL 220.50 93408 04/25/03 KURKOSKI, STEPHANIE 97.50 93409 04/25/03 NORLIN, AMANDA 67.50 93410 04/25/03 ODDEN, JESSICA 54.00 93411 04/25/03 OIE, REBECCA 54.00 93412 04/25/03 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 261.38 93413 04/25/03 VAN HALE, PAULA 32.50 93414 04/25/03 BEHAN, JAMES 1,590.15 93415 04/25/03 CHIGINSKY, APRIL 161.26 93416 04/25/03 COLLINS, ASHLEY 89.78 93417 04/25/03 DOBLAR, STEVE 86.60 93418 04/25/03 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,071.08 93419 04/25/03 JAMES, JANET 50.80 93420 04/25/03 KYRK, ASHLEY 169.88 93421 04/25/03 LOGAN, HEATHER 26.40 93422 04/25/03 PIEPER, THEODORE 26.60 93423 04/25/03 RISTOW, JONATHAN 22.59 93424 04/25/03 SARPONG, SEAN 258.35 93425 04/25/03 SCHULZE, BRIAN 243.80 93426 04/25/03 YOUNG, MATTHEW 54.38 93427 04/25/03 ZIEMER, NICOLE 58.23 93428 04/25/03 MULVANEY, DENNIS 1 498,789.09 a( AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council TO: City Manager Date Endorsed FROM: Utility/VEM Superintendent Modified Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director Rejected d SUBJECT: Single -Axle Plow Truck Dump Body .DATE: May 5, 2.003 Introduction The 2003 public works capital outlay budget includes funds for replacement of a 1991 single -axle plow truck. The chassis was purchased from Boyer Ford and scheduled for delivery in Maya Background _ Public Works VEM Division requested a proposal to equip the plow truck chassis with a dump body using existing plow /wing attachments. The state bid price from Crysteel Truck Equipment to build the dump body is $35,514.05. Recommendation Request city council authorization to enter into a contract with C steel Truck rY Equipment, under State Contract #429000, for the purchase of a single -axle truck body with existing plow /wing attachments for $35,514.05.* EN jW AGENDA ITEM NO J AGENDA REPORT Action by Council To: City Manager Richard Fursman bate From: Chief of Police David J. Thomalla Endorsed Subject: Donation - Landfall Cops `n Kids Fishing Clinic Modified Date: May 5, 2003 Rejected The Maplewood Police Department has received a $200 donation from Saturn of Saint Paul for the Landfall Cops `n Kids Fishing Clinic. City Council approval is required to accept this donation. Background The Maplewood Police Department, in conjunction with the City of Landfall, will hold its annual Landfall Cops `n Kids Fishing Clinic on June 7, 2003. In this event, children and parents from Landfall are invited to participate in a morning of fishing with officers of the Maplewood Police Department and given lunch and door prizes. Several people attended last year's event. Saturn of Saint Paul has contributed $200 to the Maplewood Police Department to assist with the costs of the fishing clinic. Recommendation It is recommended that Council approval be given to accept this donation from Saturn of Saint Paul and that the necessary budget adjustments be made so that the donation helps to defray the costs of conducting the fishing clinic. Action Regui= Submit to the City Council for review and approval. DJT: js Agenda # 64 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: May 6, 2003 RE: Food Permit Approval and Waiver of Fee T • Action by Council ?�� Da E tZ lL - -) 3 e d Modified Dejected .r Boy Scout Troop 187 is having a garage sale at Arlington Hills United Methodist Church on Saturday, May 17, 2003 from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. In conjunction with the rummage sale, the Troop is requesting a food permit to sell hot dogs and pop to raise additional funds. Background The Troop will rely on donations from the community and church congregation for items to include in their sale. The proceeds raised from the garage sale and from the sales of food will be used to purchase equipment for the Troop to use on camping trips. They are requesting that the City waive the $46.00 permit fee as has been done in past years. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the miscellaneous permit to sell food at Arlington Hills United Methodist Church and to waive the $46.00 permit fee. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: Action by Council City Manager 1 FROM: Charles Ahl P Date Public Works Director/City Engineer Erin Schacht, Civil Engineer 1 Endorsed g Wdi SUBJECT: Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, Project 02- 10 � , j cct ed 1. Public Hearing 7:00 pm (FIRST) . 2. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearin 4 votes) ) DATE: May 6, 2003 Introduction On April 28, 2003, the city council ordered a public hearing for six properties within the roJ 'ect. p area that had been inadvertently missed in the Notice of Public Hearing -sent in January. The public hearing for this project has been scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, May 12, 2003. Notices of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The city council should conduct the public hearing. Following the public hearing the city council will consider approving the attached resolution ordering the improvement after the p ublic hearing (4 votes). Background The six properties that were inadvertently missed in the original Janua Notice of Public . Hearing rY did receive notice of the three neighborhood meetings held in the fall of 2002 and the winter and spring of 2003. The six properties are listed below and are included on the attached location map. PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0025 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0031 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0032 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0033 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0034 PIN 15- 29 -22 -42 -0035 1915 Maryknoll Avenue 1872 Prosperity Avenue 1871 Maryknoll Avenue 1885 Maryknoll Avenue 1891 Maryknoll Avenue 1899 Maryknoll Avenue Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the improvement of the Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, City Project 02 -10. Budget Impact The resolution calls for establishing a project budget of $2,944,500. The financing plan is outlined specifically in the feasibility study and calls for funding from a number of sources: assessments, Sewer Utility fund, St. Paul Regional Water Services participation, WAC fund and city general tax levy. EMS 1W Attachments: Resolution Location Map RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 28th day f April 2003 Y p , fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the Kennard /Frost Area Street, City Project 02 -10, AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on May 12, 2003 and the council has s heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has full considered the same; Y , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements to the Kennard /Frost Area Streets, City Project 02 -10. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 12th day of May 2003. 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the makin g of said improvement. 4. ' A.'project budget of $2,944,500 was established following the January 27 2003 public .hearing. No revision to the project budget is required at this time as a result of this action. AGENDA ITEM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT , cdon by Council Date Richard Fursman, City Manager Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer • Erin Schacht, Civil Engineer 1 Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, Project 02 -10 1. Assessment Hearing, 7:00 p.m. (SECOND) 2. Approve Resolution for Adoption of Assessment Roll DATE: May 6, 2003 Introduction Following -the public hearing, an assessment hearing should be held for all properties in the project area. All property owners have been mailed a notice of the exact amount of their assessment, as well as notice that they must submit a written objection either at or prior to the hearing if they disagree with the assessment amount. After the first public hearing has been held, the city council should conduct the assessment hearing, receive all objections, refer those objections to the staff for action at the June 9 council meeting and consider approving the attached resolution adoptin g the assessment roll without the property owners who have submitted objections. Background The proposed assessments for the Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements total $ The assessments are consistent with the proposal included at the public hearing on January 27, 2003, and May 12, 2003. A copy of the assessment roll is provided as a supplement to this report. The assessments are based. on the standard rates as follows: • Single family street assessment = • Commercial street assessment = • Single family storm sewer assessment = • Commercial street assessment = • Sanitary sewer service for new units = • Water service for new units = • Cul -de- sac /right of way costs = Objections Filed $4,200 per unit $84.00 per front foot $660.00 per unit $13.20 per front foot $1,925 per unit installed $1,285 per unit installed $494.44 per unit No objections have been filed as of May 6, 2003. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached Resolution for the Adoption of the Assessment Roll for the Kennard /frost Area Street Improvements, Project 02 -10. Budget Impact, There would be no impact to the approved. budget based on the above recommendation. The proposed assessments to these properties were included in the original financing plan, which was approved in January. jW Attachments: Assessment Roll Provided as a Supplement to the City Council Resolution: Adoption of the Assessment Roll Location Map RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on April 14th, 2003, calling for a Public Hearing, the assessment roll for the Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements, City Project 02- 10, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, no property owners have filed objections to their assessments according to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows: 1. None NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review the objections received and report to the City Council at the regular meeting on May 27, 2003, as to their recommendations for adjustments. 2. The assessment roll for the Kennard/Frost Area Street Improvements as amended, without those property owners' assessments that have filed objections, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2004 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, but no later than August 1, 2003, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time after, August 1, 2003, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 5. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after August 1, 2003, but no later than September 2, 2003, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and p aid over the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council on this 12 day of May 2003. c.� LAURIE L RD. z � ° LAURIE Q � Q w =XN _Q V ) R D . - (D � Sherwoodz - J -- =HUST Qf Park z c~ AVE. - w O w E. >-- N _ a < v (,D 0 w w z = 8 � CO. R Q ad ton - z , . D • > g. P rk _ - E AVE. �-- BUR K �n E AVE. f CD ELD R =D Communit AVE. - Center 'John � - n Glenn 64 65 ; r ~� z LBELIVION ��- 0 � r 0 - GA TEW,,q Y Ci t y Hall S K I LLMAN AVE - . Ld HARRIS- , Q ROSEWOOD AV . Robinhood U Park ROSEWO D- R AN - RAMSEY z w AVE. 0 S . COUNTY Q J � P N� NURSING HOME A �-- - o Q- - FAIR GROUNDS -)T AVE. C/o) 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.50. FM �-- GOODRI cn � ALDRICH CH 28 w GOLF AVE. [ A - ] - COURSE MM ER AV E. �, S U M�� >- Q w o ARENA z . U Q Wakefield ] Q z W = Pork Q > 150 . RIP LEY '+ ' z m cf KINGST PHI A AV E >- _: 3 £' /f z _, k W L W ;A i �-- U) N PRICE PRICE -- . w LAR P ELATE AVE n 30 64 z no scale Y. \SDSKPRDJ :02 -10 \1}�, LOCATION.D IS 07/19/2002 03•31•5e Ptoi CDT- . _ s Project location Exhibit 1 . Project Location Kennard /Frost Area Improvement 02 -10 AGE NDA ITEM TO: FROM: AGENDA REPORT Richard Fursman City ty Manager Charles Ahl, Director Chuck Engineer I .of Public works /Cit Engi neer Vermeersch, Civil En Y gineer Action by � Date Edged SUBJECT: DATE: Introduction Maplewood Drive /Kel O eW 7: ler Parkway Resurfac' p•m• -- Assessment Ong, Project 03 -02 Hearing; Resolution 3 sessment Adopting a May 5, 200 Roll On April 14, 2003 the city council called a hear' ng to review the Maplewood Drive /Keller Parkway ass notice of the ex aY Resurfacing Project. owners Proposed essments mailed a for t act amount of their as sessment, All pr °pert he objection either at ssessment, as well as have been or prior to the hearing if they notice that they must sub ' t a written g ey disagree with the assessment - mg amount. The city council should conduct the hearin staff c r eceive all objections for action at the May g, recei Property Y 27 council meeting n ,refer any objections t p y owners who have sub g d adopt the attached a o the submitted objections. as sessment roll without the Background The proposed asses $1889463 sments for the Map(eW The ive /Keller Parkwa assessments r R on February 10 ' 20 are consistent with the Y esurfacing total re ' 03. A copy of the ass has been proposal included at the ' port. The assessments essment roll public hearin are based upon standard Provided as a supplement t ' s rates as follows: o this Single family street t cold -in- place recycle assessor Commercial street cold -in- lacer assessment $2 0 p ecycle assessment = per unit Single family street overlay assessor $44-20 One time storm sew er asses ent = per front foot assessment sin le fa _ $1580 per unit • One time storm sewer g mily - as sessment, .commer _ $660 per unit al - Objections Fil ed $13-20 per front foot There were no n objections as of May 5 . Y , 2003. .Additional objections filed during and r the week o referred to staff for review at the hearing should ew. be read into the ublic p record R ecommendation Staff recommends t hat the city co oft uncil approve the attache he Assessment Roll • 02 for the Maplewood d Resolution for the • Drive /Keller Parkway doption y Resurfacing, Project J 03 jw r CJV Attachments- Resolution Assessment Roll — Supplement Location Map al Handout RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on April 14, 2003, calling for a Public Hearing, the assessment roll for the Maplewood Drive /Keller Parkway Resurfacing, Project 03 -02, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, no property owners have filed objections to their assess merits - accord in to .g the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows: 1. None NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA: ' 1. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review the objections received and report to the City Council at the regular meeting on May 27, 2003, as to their recommendations for adjustments. 2. The assessment roll for the Maplewood Drive /Keller Parkway Resurfacing as amended without those property owners' assessments who have filed objections, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 3. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a p eriod of 15 years, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in Janua . 2004 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.0 percent per annum for the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, but no later than August 1, 2003, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time after August 1, 2003 pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 5. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after August 1, 2003, but no later than September 2, 2003, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. - Such assessments shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council on this 12 day of May 2003. Project Location Maplewood .Drive C.P. 03 -02 Fj Aefim b , TO: City Manager FROM Ken Roberts, Associate Planner D SUBJECT: Tax- Increment Financing Endorsed PROJECT Van Dyke Village Town houses Modified LOCATION: Van Dyke Street, north of County Road B ejected APPLICANT Bruce Mogren DATE May 6, 2003 INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting that the city council approve the use of tax - increment financing (TIF). The request is for the Van Dyke Village town house development. This project is on the west side of Van Dyke Street, north of County Road B. (See the maps on pages 4 through 6.) The applicant is proposing to develop 20 town houses with 15 units of affordable or work force housing on a 3.6 acre -site. (See the proposed site plan on page 6.) The' applicant is requesting that the city approve the use of 90 percent of the TIF for up to 26 years. In return for this financing, the developer would keep the rents affordable for low and moderate - income persons for work force housing. BACKGROUND On April 28, 2003, the city council approved a conditional use permit for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 20 -unit town house development for Mr. Mogren. DISCUSSION - -fax- increment Financing Tax - increment financing uses the increase in taxes from a development to finance projects with a public purpose. Tax increment is the difference in taxes between the current amount and the amount after a project is completed. The developer is requesting 90 percent of the first 26 years of tax - increment from this project. The financial consultant estimates that the gross tax - increment from this project would be about $30,003 each year. The actual amount would vary because actual future -year tax rates and tax capacities will vary. Tax increment money would normally go to the various taxing jurisdictions. The largest recipients would be the city, county and school district. The following chart shows the taxes from this project that each governmental unit would receive if the developer built this project without TIF. Unit of Government City of Maplewood Ramsey County 1. S.D. #622 Others TOTAL Tax Impact (2003 Rate and Values} $10,205 $15 $ 7,074 A10tr,� �%5/_ ,nsto To approve this financing, the city must determine that the developer would not have built this project without TIF Mr. Mogren wants to use the TIF to help cover the cost of soil corrections, . other infrastructure elements and to help keep the rents affordable for work force housing. (Please see the narrative attachment starting on page 8.) The agencies listed above may not have received this money if the city did not approve the use of TIF. Zoning Approvals The city does not usually approve tax- exempt or TIF unless the city has approved' the proper zoning. This avoids neighbors criticizing the city for approving the financing before holding the public hearing for the zoning changes. Neighbors may claim that the city has approved the project before the zoning hearing by approving TIF. In this case, the city's approval of the PUD on April 28, 2003, is the zoning approval for this proposal. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution starting on page 11. This resolution establishes a tax - increment financing district for the Van Dyke Village town house development on Van Dyke Street for up to 26 years. Subsequent to the establishment of the tax - increment financing district, the City must approve a Development Agreement that establishes the number of years of tax- increment assistance the City will provide to the developer. The Development Agreement will require that the tax- increment financing assistance be subject to the community design review board (CDRB) approving the site, grading landscaping and building design plans. 2 REFERENCE Past Actions on other Housing Financing 1982: Council gave concept approval to using tax - increment financing to help with the development of a seniors housing project. This project would have used about $150,000 of tax - increment funds for each of two senior housing developments (Hazel Ridge and Bennington Woods). The developer abandoned the program. 1- 14 -85: The council gave preliminary approval for $5.8 million of tax - exempt financing for up to 100 units for the Hazel Ridge Seniors Residence at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. 11- 25 -85: The council gave preliminary approval for $6.5 million of tax - exempt financing_ for the 116 -unit Harmony School (Casey Lake) Seniors Residence (County Road C and White Bear Avenue). This was subject to construction beginning within one year. (The developer never built this project.) 1987 -88: The council approved $2,448,100 of tax - exempt, housing revenue bonds for the 60 unit - Cottages of Maplewood (Village on Woodlynn) project. The council also approved $275,000 of tax - increment financing. 1988: The city received a federal grant (CDBG) of $252,500 for the Village on Woodlynn. The developer, used this money toward the purchase of the land. 1991: The city council approved tax - exempt and tax - increment financing for the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phases I and II). In 1993, the council asked the county to approve a low - interest loan for this project. The county approved the loan. Income Limits The income limits for the work force housing residents in this development are: 1. For a three- person household, at the 50 percent median income level, an annual income of about $34,500 per year. 2. A three - person household, at the 60 percent median income level, will have an annual income of about $41,000 per year. kr /p:Sec 11 Nan Dyke Village TIF.mem Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Maplewood Development District No. 1 Map 5. Narrative Attachment date - stamped May 5, 2003 6. Resolution: Tax-increment financing 3 Attachment 1 . U narzsrwood w Plant Z p AVE t� g > El • in 0 Cn I Cr a z A EDGEHILL RD. o, 0 DEMONT w Cr. AVE --1 . gloom BROOKS AVE. m �iBROOKS w — • AVE. (n EL �� Q SEX TANT AVE. Z Seoaans C k ��/E' >- GERVAIS -� or. w 0 C1 w a U U. GERVAIS ' 5 GRANDVIEW AVE. z z CT. VIKING DR. Y � SHERREN AVE. - CASTLE AVE. C) Knucke Lake _- i AVE. COPE AV ��• � • G AVE. LARK Q -' �n z LAURIE RD. LAURIE RD. LAURIE RD. w SANDII URST ? Pbric X AVE. w o w C.) 0 0 J w — z B �n W c� z Y CO. RD. B a s M BURKE AVE. v ° ® BURKE der PROPOSED PROPOSED TIF DISTRICT -DR IDGE A 3 VE. 1 � .� � - -- )NT AVE. 3 z GQtew ter Ate• HAREMS AVE w ROSEWOOD AVE. N. cr a ROSEW00 D RY AN AV. ,�- �, AVE. S. RAMSEY COUNTY • � �� NURSING HOME AND of FAIR GROUNDS CL / ! AVE ALDRICH . GOODRICH GOLF � � Z � � � � COURSE W E. o v Ci SU MME AVE ARENA W Q M z ir <*> a coodricb C9 `., J � Q �• Pork RIPLEY AVE � G ~.Wakefieid.= m `. O� `�,'�:,Lake: � � o Mr m �� _ v KINGSTON AVE HOLLOWAY cn . � 2 _ 7 �u. RI PL! DR. LOCATION MAP 4 r PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 4 N A.++:% e- kmm.n+ r t . . ��. ` ICY v vim.........- • �. LU LU oc I w F 4 N Attachment 4 �� •rte 1 �. �.� —� •.� A map of DeveloineM Diftict. No. I. aM E6XWnio Devftpment b1grict Not 1-6 Is set f brie bokyw. Id 1 � >f J i i c s 7 op • i MAIM am ` ,. now- ♦� �� •mss y 10 A Am aft ► • >I �. • . •fs'>i CITY-O w M 5 D ISTRICT O AS ri i k I I I >f J i i c s 7 Attachment 5 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD NARRATIVE ATTACHMENT TO APPLICATION FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 1. Project Name: Van Dyke Village Address: Van Dyke Street North, approximately one block north of County Road B. Maplewood Project Owner: Van Dyke Street Homes, Limited Partnership Telephone #: (651) 777 -3600 MA Y Contact: Bruce Mogren RECEIVED 2. Present Ownership of the Site: The project site is currently owned by the City of Maplewood. The Applicant has an agreement with the City of Maplewood for the acquisition of the project site. 3. Project Description: The Project being proposed is comprised of twenty townhome- style living units in four buildings. Each unit will have an attached garage and there will be adequate surface parking. The project will contain 8 one - story, two - bedroom units, and 12 two- story, three- bedroom units. According to guidelines established by the UMTA, 75% of the units will be rent - restricted. Amenities will include a playground. . 4. Estimated Sources of Financing MFHA First Mortgage (sized w/o TIF) $916 MHFA FFCC Loan $418 Tax Credit Investor Equity $1 Ramsey County BRA $3 00, 000 Financin Gap $768,411 Total Project Cost $3 ON 5. Necessity for use of tax increment financing for project: The applicant has several reasons for applying for tax increment assistance. First, the total needed infrastructure costs include: Soils corrections (replacement) Earthwork (excavation) Landscaping Paving and Street Patching Sidewalks Utilities Playground and Benches Total Infrastructure $190 168, 600 51,804 40,200 17,213 57,105 22 $547,647 These costs include removal and replacement of some of the existing soil so that it will bear the load of structures. These infrastructure and beautification costs also have long- term benefit to the City and the neighbors. These costs are more than the project can finance. Second, due to restrictions on the City's ownership and use of the project site (as tax forfeited land), the site can currently only be used for a workforce housing project. The reduction in rents from market rate to rents restricted at a level based on 50% of area median income significantly reduces the mortgage loan funding available. One estimate is that making this project affordable versus market rate ($.73 / sf rents versus $1.00 / sf rents) cost approximately $950,000 in funding. But this is the margin between rents that are affordable to the city workforce and those that are not. The applicant has done its best to fill that gap with other sources (NU-IFA, and Ramsey County BRA) before applying for - tax increment assistance. If this project can't proceed, those other sources of funding would be lost, and it would be reasonable to assume that any alternative workforce housing project would have even a greater funding gap. Third, the MHFA's award of Section 42 tax credits will be forfeited if tax increment assistance is not received. This is one more reason the project cannot be built without tax increment assistance. Finally, the reduction in project size from the originally proposed 30 units to 20 units had the effect of eliminating $60,000 in committed funding from the Ramsey County BRA while increasing the average construction costs. This 'had the effect of widening the financing gap. For these reasons tax increment assistance is justified on this Project and it is accurate to say that the project cannot be built without tax increment assistance. 60 . Amount and structure of tax increment financing requested: The Applicant is proposing the creation of a Housing TIF District and pay -as -you go tax increment financing equal to approximately 90% of the projected tax increment, for the maximum term of the TIF District (approximately 25 years). It is anticipated that this will take the form of a pay -as- you -go note with a 6.50% interest rate. It is anticipated that this TIF will be pledged to the first mortgage lender to support 'an increased mortgage amount. Although the City's consultants will perform an estimate of the TIF available, based on the attached TIF Mortgage sizing, our estimate is that such a pledge of TIF will result in increased mortgage loan proceeds of approximately $360,340 p y being available for project costs. Thus TIF would cover about one -half of the $768,411 financing gap shown above. The remainder of the gap, should TIF financing be available, would be covered by a deferral of fees owed to the project developer. 201606M 10 Attachment 6 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF THE MAY 12 2003 MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly called and held on the 12th day of May, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ESTABLISHING HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -7 AND APPROVING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFORE WITHIN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS: A. WHEREAS, there is a proposal to modify the Development Program for Development District No. 1, and establish Housing District No. 1 -7 therein and approve and accept the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179 (the "Act "); and B. WHEREAS, the proposed Modification to the Development Program for Development District No. 1 (the "Modification "), and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -7 (the "Tax Increment Financing Plan ") have been prepared; and C. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of Development District No. 1 and Housing District No. 1 -7 therein, and the adoption of a proposed development program and tax increment financing plan therefore, including, but not limited to, notification of Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 622 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in Housing District No. 1 -7 and the holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice as required b law and q y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood as follows: 1. Modification Findings The City finds, determines and declares that with respect to the Modification. 1527425vl 11 (a) The City is not modifying the boundaries of Development District No. 1 but is, however, modifying the Development Program to allow for the increased costs associated with Housing District No. 1 -7 as described in the Modification. 2. Housing District No. 1 -7 . There is established in the City of Maplewood within Development District No. 1 a Tax Increment Financing District, the initial boundaries of which are fixed and determined as described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan. 3. Tax Increment Financing Plan The Tax Increment Financing Plan is adopted as the tax increment financing plan for Housing District No. 1 -7, and the City Council makes the following findings: (a) Housing District No. 1 -7 is a housing district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 11-, the specific basis for such determination being that the 20 unit townhome -style housing facility project will provide safe, decent, affordable, sanitary housing for residents of the city and it will result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the State. (b) The proposed redevelopment in the opinion of the City Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of Housing District No. 1 -7 permitted by the Tax Increment Financing Plan. The reasons supporting this finding are that: (i) Private investment will not finance these development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these development activities through the use of tax increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will occur within Development District No. 1. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of Housing District No. 1 -7 and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above. Such analysis is found in Exhibit E of the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of Housing District No. 1 -7 and the use of tax increments. (c) The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -7 conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City of Maplewood as a whole. The reasons for supporting this finding are that: (i) Housing District No. 1 -7 is properly zoned; and 1527425v1 17 (ii) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will generally complement and serve to implement policies adopted by the City. (d) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City of Maplewood as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Development District No. 1 by private enterprise. The reasons supporting this finding are that: The development activities are, necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within Development District No. 1. 4. Public Purpose The adoption of the Modification to the Development Program for Development District No. 1, and the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing . _ g g District No. 1 -7 therein conform in all respects to the re* quirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to. develop an area of the State which is already built up to provide employment opportunities and provide safe, decent, sanitary housing for all residents of the city to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. 5. Certification The Auditor of Ramsey County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of Housing District No. 1 -7 as described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased in accordance with the Act; and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within i Housing District No. 1 -7 for which buildm* gP enmts have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this Resolution. 6. Filing The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housin g District No. 1 -7 with the Commissioner of Revenue. 7: Administration The administration of Development District No. 1 is assigned to the City Clerk who shall from' time to time be granted such powers and duties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.130 and 469.131 as the City Council may deem appropriate. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1527425vl ]3 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the modification of Development District No. 1 and the establishment of Housing District No. 1 -7 therein in the City. WITNESS my hand this day of May, 2003. City Clerk 1527425v1 14 A I A ITEM N O, I I, MEMORANDUM Action by Council TO: City Manager FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Assistant Community Development ment Director i. SUBJECT: Street Vacations -- Maplewood Middle School ���`` '' LOCATION: 2410 Holloway Avenue DATE: April 24, 2003 Rejected- 74 � INTRODUCTION Ron Parrucci, Director of Business Services for School District 622, is requesting that the city council vacate two street rights -of -way on the Maplewood Middle School property. Refer to the maps on pages 3-4 and Mr. Parrucci's letter on page 5. The reason for the requested vacations is that the Tierney Avenue right -of -way lies beneath the school and the Frisbie Avenue right -of -way lies within the athletic fields. Both are dead -end rights -of -ways that are not needed for street or utility purposes. The applicant wants to vacate these streets since there is no reason to keep them of record. BACKGROUND Maplewood Middle School was constructed in 1960 and 1961. DISCUSSION Dave Marruffo, of the St. Paul Regional Water Services, stated that they have no interest in these rights -of -way for utilities. They have no objection to their vacation. The city council should vacate these street rights -of -way since there is no public purpose in retaining them. COMMISSION ACTION April 22, 2003: The planning commission recommended approval of these vacations. RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution on page 6 for the vacation of the Tierney Avenue and Frisbie Avenue street rights -of -way at Maplewood Middle School. The reason for these vacations is that there is no p ublic purpose in retaining them. Application Date The city received this application on March 19, 2003. State law requires the cit y to take action on this request by May 18, 2003. p:sec13- 29\MapMidSchoolVac. doc Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Letter from Ron Parrucci dated February 19, 2003 4. Street Vacation Resolution K Attachment 1 .H HOLLOWAY leo A I .. QP ' �n 2. PROPOSED KN (RIGHT-OF-WAY _ � o °x °` � o g 4 ' VACATIONS AVE. RI PLEY AV 3 ON AVM i KIN ON D AVE. 90Uili � a w Z V Co I`IMJGHT LN CL C m LARPENTEUR AVE. Q W F= o CLI 0 M IDAHO AVE U W O i } i O >_ cc W O HOYT AVE. g MONTANA AVE. WWMA MONTANA W - qR. �CiwN aw AVM & . I MXNAEL , NEBRASKA w • 1 !► 3 4 2 REBECCA 3 PINEfREE. p 2 4 BIRCMD Netxosfoo �' Pat* z V N odm � rte.. GAMIL- N W �'' Cr � Cr 5 Cr. Ism's Si�YC PINE 7RE) U Plrolrfs 5 6 7 CL 6 BIRCHVIEV 7 ROUJNG Ca ..a ELMEART w o AVE TILSEN IN DR o cc LS t ANTELOPE WAY W AVE. BISON 2 A ALACK LN z CT. 3 BEYERDIALE RD W 4 BOBCAT LN O \2� 3 5 COUGrFR LN 4 5 HAWi1lORNE A i E. MARYLAND AVE. E.ROSE ! o ST tn (� w In • P� --- , a GERAJW O. ". �- f MAGNOLIA AVE. awmium Bewer ' k S SIC z Lak _j r' W Sp� PL G Cn f r te r' 00 0 = z o AVE : CASE AVE.. _ Q W w BRAND L LN. BRAND AVE. W p'`v o u' C AVE. Pork tn 7th ST. � 7th ST. z Cwftr J BUSH 0 'S; �•�v4 Cr. LOCATION MAP 3 4 N Attachment 2 n m m m wm HOLLOWAY "ENUE E w M wo W M M r� . I � Loc.�1450 2 fro _ tZ � % 33 � Z0.0 17 4 o ,6 - 5/7.. -2.5 82 � �•� � -;� • 79.9 �} � �% 9) � �� ( c o4Z G f fV1 4 •.. � ( 2 Z ( , Z 4, 80 Ls .o i (} 0 3 x' x' o o �• Off �. •. I C3p� 0! S �2 or o�-3 o a o � 2 o J� oo '• 120.2 1�4 I �s - Qr 3�•4 l z I�`^ foo 94.2 r 7s 75 '• 75 '14.42 m 8 �; 3 00 33 L �(33� a ; ' MAPLEWOOD 1 ( I C.31) • DO OU N , 3 31 O - ` / i o II ` � , ' •3�.. - i I • - 5 MIDDLE d 3 �� TI N o 333 � v 3� �C H OO L 4 E o .�i 7S I 0 �100 • I sa . Z !o- 8Z pav slip for, - - ui TIER T 5 �->-N- .. :. , :_ , ( 7186o Cp 9 � - -AV A _ v aoC • 112401 4 N 141.75 - - -- ' 14 1. ?5 iC5.�7 00 9 ( o« Q o ' ((33) 0 �. (4 _ _ }.. 2 4e O -8 ti 5 14& 47 C � 2 C34� 00 PROPOSED 2 ( .35 ) .� 2'1 (4-5) S VACATIONS S 14- ise t �/ ME �-�-. 4 5 6 is6.ls 87� 3 l � 12 �a�t. ° 4 (�) :: .25 i r%'Fi 0 1 I �l9) c I I A .0:: -V 0 1 (C82) •:• • 5 -a' lu 8 ) p & 5 1 , 3 (0) �z8 o Lo (70 to ol) 9 o (44) p 7 a P Pw W O , ((4t) �° ,Q o (2 7.) C z 5. ' -- .� ----� O 1 O / 48 • L 9 3.78 O (7 C$ 0) 51 ` =� �-- = >>6 g o . RfPLE • �' h 0 X09.54 . 4 � 8 � °° -� ,P �� 2 3 ( 4 o GG.03 43 , 3s iR . 30 ( I O r -. - RIPLEY AVENUE - - 1 -- -- ;! O - i 10 3 eo .• - _ . o � I 13) �• � 1 i �,3 so A c c� PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP n N hool istrict 622 Attachment 3 Februar 19, 2003 Cit of Maplewood 1830 Count Road B East Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Public Vacation Application T Whom It Ma Concern: Maplewood Middle School was constructed in 1960-61. The site of the school buildin and athletic areas are included within the two areas we are re for vacation. There are no additional propert owners affected b this re for street vacation. Included with this application is a topo surve done b Clark En dated 10/29/01, with the -re -vacation areas hi Th, nk y o Ron Parrucci Director of Busi ss Services Enclosure 5 A communit partnership where learnin and citizenship come first NORTH ST. PAUL - MAPLEW00 . D - OAKDALE T THE DISTRICT 622 EDUCATION CENTER 2520 E. 12" AvENUE, NORTH ST. PAUL, MN 55109 Attachment 4 STREET VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, School District 622 has applied for the vacation of the Tierney venue and Frisbi y e � Avenue rights -of -way located on the Maplewood Middle School property, 2410 Holloway Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: r 1. On April 21, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve these vacations. 2. On May 12, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements., The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. . . WHEREAS, after the city approves these vacations, public interest in the property will go to the property located at 2410 Holloway Avenue, legally described as follows: All of Wiesner Park NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the above - described street right -of -way vacations because there is no public purpose in retaining them. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on May 12, 2003. me Planning Commission Minutes of 04 -21 -03 There were no audien -3- members that wanted�W�speak on this issue. Commissioner Pearson move o ad�� resolution on page 4 of the staff report. This resolution approves the proposed Comprehe ve Sanitary Sewer Plan Update. Commissioner Ledvina set- -onded. The motion paced. VI. NEW BUSINESS Ay - FDesai, Dierich, Fischer, Ledvina Monahan- , Junek, er, Pearson, Rossbach, Trippler a. Street Right -of -Way Vacations -- Maplewood Middle addle School (Holloway and Lakewood Mr. Roberts said Ron Parrucci, Director of Busine • . ess Services for School District 622, is re uestin that��fhe city council vacate two street q g eet rights -of -way on the Maplewood Middle School property. reason for the requested vacation - p p �y. The q ons is that one, Tierney Avenue right-of-way, lies in th e location of the school. The oth er, Frisbee Avenue, lies withi wa n the athletic fields. B • s that Both are dead -end rights -of- y at are not needed for street or utility purposes. The a li p p pp cant wants to vacate these streets since there is no reason to keep them of record. Commissioner Dierich asked how often does it happen that street right-of-ways are vacated needed years later? Y and are Mr. Roberts said it has happened in the act and ' � • dedicate new right-of-ways p �t would not be difficult to request that property owners dedi ht -of -wa s with new p p Y g Y development plans. Commissioner Rossbach moved to approve the resolution pp esolution on page 6 for the vacation of the Tierney Avenue and Frisbie Avenue street rights-of-way at g y Maplewood Middle School. The reason for these vacations is that there is no public purpose in retainin g them. .Commissioner .Pearson seconded. Ayes _ • . y s Desa�, Dierich, Fischer, Ledvi na, •Monahan -Junek Mueller, Pearson, Rossbach, Tri pp ler The motion passed. This item oes to the city co u ncil g y on May 12, 20030 b. Frontline Churc onditional Use Permit — 2055 White Bear Ave e Mr. Roberts said Mr. Bill Arrig 'representing Frontline C� , is proposing to open a church in the existing ASI officelwarehousin 'Iding at 2055�ite Bear Avenue. This would be a new location for the church that is now operating ' os vi1Te on Hamline Avenue. To have the church in this location, Mr. Arri'goni is asking that Maples o prove a conditional use permit (CUP). The Maplewood City Code requires a CUP fo��hurches and es of worship. As proposed, the school would lease about 11,500 square f .et of space in the exis i 82,000 - square -foot building. Mr. Roberts said the church would u.sheir space primarily on Sund ornings and on Wednesda evenings. These times roid not conflict with the other tenants in th ilding as they use their spaces primarily durin , Vhe day on weekdays. AGENDA ITEM No ....& MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit PROJECT: Frontline Church. LOCATION: 2055 White Bear Avenue DATE: April 24, 2003 INTRODUCTION Project Description ,Action by Council. Date En cl ;l y 1�10 dified wam Rejected Mr. Bill Arrigoni, representing Frontline Church, is proposing to open a church in the existing ASI office /warehousing building at 2055 White Bear Avenue. (See the location and property I -ine maps on pages 5 and 6 and the other maps on pages 7 -9.) This would be a new location for the church that is now operating in Roseville on Hamline Avenue. Request To have the church in this location, Mr. Arrigoni is asking that Maplewood approve a conditional use permit (CUP). The Maplewood City Code requires a CUP for churches and places of worship. (Refer to the applicant's statement on pages 10 -12.) BACKGROUND On September 10, 2001, the city council approved a CUP for Sobriety High School to operate from the existing once /warehouse building on the site. DISCUSSION The proposed church meets the city's findings of approval for a conditional use permit. As proposed, the school would lease about 11,500 square feet of space in the existing 82,000 square -foot building. The church would use their space primarily on Sunday mornings and on Wednesday evenings. These times would not conflict with the other tenants in the building as they use their spaces primarily during the day on weekdays. For example, on a recent weekday, counted 15 vehicles parked outside of the Sobriety--High--space- With a maximum service attendance of 350 people with about 100 vehicles occurring on Sundays, the existing parking lot should be adequate to handle the parking needs of the church and the. existing tenants. There are about 170 total parking spaces on the site with 68 in the front of the building and the others around the building. In addition, Dan Soler, the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, told me that he had no concerns with the church going into this building from a traffic perspective as the bulk of their activity would be on Sunday mornings when the traffic volume on White Bear Avenue is lower. (Please also see the memo from Mr. Soler on page 15.) As part of this project, the church is proposing to change a door on the east side of the building from a single -wide to a double -wide. This change is minor and will not affect the look of the building. The applicant should note that the city will require permits for any remodeling of the existing space. This will include having sprinklers and a fire alarm system that meets code requirements. Other Comments Fire Marshal Butch Gervais, the Maplewood Fire Marshal, noted the following conditions: 1. Afire protection (sprinkler) system is required. 2. Monitoring of all fire protection systems is required. 3. A lockbox is required for fire department access.. 4. There shall be notification devices throughout the building. 5. Early warning devices (smoke detection) are required. Also see the comments from David Fisher, the Maplewood Building Official, on page 13 and the comments from Deputy Chief Banick on page 14. COMMISSION ACTION On April 21, 2003, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for this church. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on pages 15 and 16. This resolution approves the conditional use permit for Frontline Church to operate in the building at 2055 White Bear Avenue. Maplewood bases this permit on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans dated March 26, 2003, as approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed church must be started in this location within one year after council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The church shall meet the requirements of the city building official and the fire marshal. In addition, city staff shall determine the maximum capacity of the church upon review of the final floor and building plans. 4. The property owner or manager shall sweep and restripe the parking lot before the church occupies their space. 5. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 2 CITIZENS' COMMENTS City staff surveyed the owners of the 38 properties within 350 feet of the site of the proposed school. Of the five replies, two were for the project, none objected and three had comments. For 1. Please approve -- would be good for the city. (Berwald Investment Company — North Saint Paul) 2. Sounds great - unless the size changes (increase). (Lehmann - 2053 Prosperity) Opposed None Comments 1. My wife and I discussed this and have no objections. (Oswald - 1700 Rosewood Avenue) 2. We have no objections. (Owner — 2075 Prosperity Road) 3. Our concern would be the large increase in traffic an Prosperity Road as it has already increased a lot these past few years. Sunday mornings most of us are going to church also! We have nothing against the church coming in. (Grealish — 2111 Prosperity Road) - 3 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 8.8 acres Existing land use: Existing 82,000 - square -foof once /warehouse building (17,712 square feet of office space and 64,288 square feet of warehouse /light manufacturing space) SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Vacant property planned and zoned M -1 (light manufacturing) South: DNR Gateway Trail West: A single dwelling and Excel Air across Prosperity Road East: Maplewood Community Center across White Bear Avenue PLANNING Zoning: M -1 (light manufacturing) ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 36- 437(3) requires a CUP for churches and for places of worship. Application Date We received the complete applications and materials for this proposal on March 26, 2003. State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. As such, the city council must act on these requests by May 24, 2003, unless the applicant requests a time extension. p:sec15 /frontline church CUP.doc Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Area Map 4. Floor Plan . 5. Proposed Floor Plan 6. Applicant's Statement 7. April 1, 2003, memo from David Fisher 8. April 11, 2003, memo from Deputy Chief Banick 9. April 22, 2003, memo from Dan Soler 10. Conditional Use Permit Resolution CI Attachment 1 �Ze c o AVE. Hazelwood v c� L RoAO w �' � c ; 23 X d �' Z Z d W Z a7 4 W D EHILL RD. 6S US Z c DEMONT AVE. m 0 >- ROOK AVE. E. W ' U � a AVE. 1 1 th AVE Four Pc� SEXTANT AVE. P°'* AVE. 1= GRANDVIEW AVE. ' Fr: , VIKING to -)I SHERREN ] E Knucgl ' e " ' Heod Lake � AVE. P 4 COPE AVE.=--- ..- -� Q C AVE. �- 4/ J ~ W . K AVE. � 1=7 --• �- • " � � L D. ? LAURIE � RD. LAURIE in „ SANDj HURST Pork Z AVE. B co. RD. > e vno _ z <E ®� BURKE AVE. �- BURKE AVE. P AV. 4 (n ELD IDGE AVE. 65 cen ' J John Glenn 64 BELMON LN. o° �Q• City Haft O AV E. SKILL AVE. HARRIS AVE. AN E. § I I,- ROSEWOOD AVE. N U Ro D R A AV. � ROSEW RAMS COUNTY Z ly Q` �. AVE. S. NURSI NOIRE AND O ��� FAI GROUNDS 29 F ST AVE. ROLL OW L_ * GOLF GOODRICH 9P ® � - 28 W �, i t9 W AVE. [� COURSE QP� cn UMM ER AV E. v S� ARENA . ° z '�' cv W 4 Goodrich f c oro 150 �. _i Pork to Ni1lsJde PdA W W n' ce- 0 RI PLEY AVE. RIPLEY G Wakefield Y 0 = � � KINGSI acv �� �O Lvke o m KINGSTON O AV low F F- _ (n PHI A VE }- � y w �' w PRICE AVE. � t? ui `,� �� j Y r _ _ m HT 9 Y MCKNIG Z w PRICE Py �; �� 29 w = w p c, w = LAJ 64 F- a 65 ST. PAUL HO � MONTAN �r LOCATION MAP 5 4 N Attachment Z ROAD -d B z L � on '10�opf' f46. S 3 7 4 9 3 '• I + w ( r 0 7.7 ♦0 - \ / O r 7'T �110 � I . � v . (2� 31 I •4 S 7 g 9 110 11 I � �• o g9�.. r' , t4 13 IZ ►1 l0 9 8 5 q 2 I _ .•'' I � ' I i ter• , �_ l�° ,�, � � C�� � � � - (I) �• 4. n b �3� �(4) , - 1( (31) 1 1, � 5 2 r. kA 4 24� 2S 6 I ' , I 1 n - ��, o —7 - 1 Z3 24 25 26 2 31 30 i Z9 I Z5 Z4 22 t ° ^ 1) d 9 4 t '7 y Y + I I of N J �: 1 &O 40 .• 40 .101 AA a n +. r .. r. � 7 .7 2 i O Rl -�ao q BURKE 0. • � ty ` A. V E. .1 36.93 v �9o•z T.S 45505 5- ► -� 19 . �ts5L4 3•ZZ 6D / D {O • if . w '• 1 40 w h ..'� .. 4 2 9 j fool ��.s �9. 1 ! / � r �7 ) Ca N F iel E � t'16)D o i I „ ( ii' °. 3a� Z3� Il I g� o I 3 I Z I t � - 1 2 1 3 4 1 5 �a• 7% `C \ po 2 _ t 2 CID i 5 ZG I- 1 (lo) c (8) r I�' 3 I Q ( I 1 074. 211'1 - 1 24 2- a� 19 ,g 1 17 tc� + t I y I (40 o , 7 9 9.44 1 40 +� 46 1 ti , i 'i 565• e 1 O 42 - �52.y� X3 �- G 125• 2`5 •Z .9c . f I t 2 ¢ = %9 2 095 ---� ---- �-- _� l i ' 03 a � y r 1 A J 1 1 I 035) o 3 10 b Sac i If 2075' 1P) - i _ 4 •—� 2080 5 ! D F hb' es.,t h 7.6 3 (.+8 13 8 ) �' T 5 I Zr t d 4.d G W {39. Nw,, _ - SITE f - `> — 3 ° . 2055 uj in 166,5j& az 9 rAp 9. 0 7 . C t 3(r 5 3 lit 56 rn % ao; � GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE "� - ' 5` 57.5v 33 - c t ., ., 9 0 �5 E / 9 H r.� to M. ti - - -3 � ` !-.\ �., 1 , a $MT. ,� `�. l 14 ) � M : i '�"' X0 ai M ,� ml ti "� " M 4 03 T r ay 2032 i �� o `� ' C o M� Co ?I Co A � �a coo �1 Q' �1 a 1 �� (' I) � , t 8 co , � N I 2019 I t- I t- _ ; % "s "� !' 1 s -� 721 I 75 T� 75 TS'. 7 '7S o.le 1 �c 1 4 / - " D -- 7.0 �O R OS E W w O O D AV E . �2 `. �- 9 X15' � - \ r 1ZO 1 O 'Q 2 ;;3g 0 ?31 ` 1 I {oo >j . o' ,� 6 5 4 �- ,� r 3 � 2 _I 1 .4 35�•9� -°� Isd 3.5 '� { 3 3 7, N (41) (-��) I (3 9 I c 38� (3 7, " - 1 --l• r I (���a'+ � s: '4a' i :� m 1732 (IS) o c 7 8 t 10 I I ) I .. 4 0 40 0 \ 3 t I �/ `\ 120 C l 100 10� 10 o t3 9.59 .� ° ,� `�I / 3 ,. +yy 149 ROS EWOOD ' . 14 I °o , u , / (+9,� O 6 p n Z3 22 I 21 Z 19 1$ I� I IFi �0 1 / � i / \�-9i sl 5 \ 0 (ZS) I � (2..4)1 (23) I 02- �9' ) I (Z108.446 ; ! ;Zp, I (1�; ( - _ r 145 108.a '� - -�-- 5 'l � 4 5 , �5 2 %3 O _ 12.G)� ms's X. `o v Cu N m `''� PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N 1 654 1660 1 6761 0678 1 682 2155 4 O 1 fi55 L164il 16 n 875 37 E::] BURKE AVE E 21 1 �` 11 y Q. 0 0 0 r �Q o Q Y a _I i. �1 0 '1 0 2080 1726 1� 17 17 1758 1764 1774 2 1734 � 747 � 1765 1771 I_J BURKE AVE E 1708 1 Eij44 � '� F; 1 -112$ LJ 0 J n6ED 1 7�7 1732 1987 Q ti � O � ROSEWOOD AVE S (� Z � 4726 u 1712 17 1� 1gsg 1989 --, 1961 1937 AREA MAP tt chm n 3 tgas 1 1800 �J O� G 'Q 0 1949 O 19� 2020 �� LJ Attachment 4 3 w ill Z W Ll W L�] Lj PARKING LOT PROPOSAL FOR FR ON TLINE CHURCH 2 05�5 WH ITE BEAT- A vE N 0�. x w - W- < W �ol v Z w w � v Lail J FLOOR PLAN 4 N Attachment 5 w LU LIJ I Cj A a IC Ld 0 oe a C-) L tL Ld Cn ti C* W it 1!3 z u LY pa O C\j Q U) LJ ReOPOSAL For F Cwz 2055 WRi-rc BeAiz AveNuc SC#AL- OML .3 11)530 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN 4 % t � � te CA I 1 T 0 LL 14 /* I LU LIJ I Cj A a IC Ld 0 oe a C-) L tL Ld Cn ti C* W it 1!3 z u LY pa O C\j Q U) LJ ReOPOSAL For F Cwz 2055 WRi-rc BeAiz AveNuc SC#AL- OML .3 11)530 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN 4 City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B E Maplewood, MN 5510 Conformity to Crit • The propos character o of this prod primary fur • We believ activities c crime, yet far remov( Attachment 6 n tline Ch urch nd Outreach Center is consistent with,,,,, venue it iS Iacated in and will not change the roundings. There i a school; sobriety High in the neighboring space e feel that the use f a church is very consistent with a school since its are one aid the: sarne` assembly & education. • None of the Church's activities will pose a nuisance to the community in terms of noise, pollution, odors, or hazards since we will not perform any type of manufacturing or handling of any hazardous materials. The only outdoor activities we would envision such as a children's class playing would be low impact in terms of noise. Any outdoor activities which are permitted by the owners of the building will only take place between the hours of 10:00 am and 8:00 pm which is consistent with city ordinances. • All of our activities with the exception of weekly office functions will take place during non- business hours and therefore will not be a negative burden on vehicular traffic patterns. The existing accesses to the property are more than adequate for the capacity of the space we intend to lease. Currently our largest service attendance is at approximately 100 people and approximately 3 0 vehicles. Our total capacity if we should grow to that would be approximately 350 people which would require approximately 100 parking spaces. The parking lots on the premises provide over 175 parking spaces. • Since the property is currently used by several businesses - our presence, will not create any extra costs for public services which are already in place, and all of the needs of our visitors will be adequately met by the facilities contained within our proposed space, so- we will put no further demand on public facilities. • Our presence will have no impact other than- positive on the scenic features or environmental effects. We will have no control over exterior or landscaping changes since we will be in a lease situation, the owners. are responsible for exterior maintenance [ and upgrades. - 1 - Comments: • Churches are an asset to the communities that they serve in that we bring crucial services to the families of the community at no charge. The costs of these services are borne by the church organization thus freeing City and County Human Services from some of their financial burden. This is especially important in these times of budget cuts. • I would like to also point out that most of our congregation come from various communities around the Metro area and as they attend .church (many twice per week) they will patronize many of the businesses in the Maplewood community. It is also an accepted fact that some church members eventually relocate their residence to the city that their church resides in. i • Frontline Church was established in March of 1994 and now has a staff of five. licensed and/or ordained ministers with Bible College degrees. We are experienced in dealing successfully with the gravest crisis in life. Our church has helped literal strangers who have come to us with _the following problems; chemical addictions, terminal illnesses, unwed pregnancy, two refugees from Ethiopia, single parents, marriage problems, need of food, widows. We have provided toys for the poor children at Christmas, family meals at Thanksgiving and Christmas, love and training for dysfunctional children and families, 11 marriage counseling, the list could go on and on. We have risen to the occasion over and over at no cost to the individuals or the community, we are here to heal, bless, and to lead. We are well trained, experienced and ready to serve the City of Maplewood and its surrounding communities. • We not only reach out to those in need but we are also here to provide "preventative medicine" by teaching and training people how to lead spiritually healthy lives so that they can avoid the pitfalls that seem to plague our society in epidemic proportions. I'm speaking of things like divorce, child abuse, chemical additions, domestic violence, sexual immorality and all of its ramifications. Consider for a moment that Churches serve as Peacekeepers in our. communities like "police on the beat" and they are. free of cost! We help families stay together, love one another, and lead happy successful lives. r • Not only are we there for the tough times but we develop a rich sense of community among those who attend where deep trusting and rewarding friendships are. formed. - • ` As peoples lives unfold, Frontline is there with the wisdom of Christ to lead them in the - steps of founding a health marriage, raisin children and becoming productive, p g Y g g gp responsible and contributing members of their community. - Our mission is, we are here to help in meaningful and tangible- ways." Our message is, "that everything we do as a church is an attempt to express the un- searchable ' riches of-the - , love that God has for every person on the face of the earth." _ Thank you` for the opportunity to share our vision and mission with you. We hope that you. grant us this Conditional Use Permit so that we can come, and be a part of your. great City of Maplewood. Sincey y n r „ I Bill Arrig J ni Senior Pastor Frontline Church & Outreach Center 12 Attachment 7 Memorandum To: Ken Roberts, Assoc. Planner From: David,-Fisher, Building Official Date: April 1, 2003 Re: 2055 White Bear Ave Due to the change in occupancy the building code will require total compliance for all aspects of the code. This will require an architect to design .plans for the building and a mechanical engineer todesign the mechanical and plumbing systems. The documents shall include a complete code analysis by the design professional. The bathrooms look undersized for assembly occupancy. The exiting 'does not meet code; I believe one -half of the exits for the sanctuary must exit directly outside. There are many separations required between the mixed occupancies. The fire sprinkler system may need to be upgraded. It will require a full NFPA 72 fire alarm system throughout the space. Accessible parking may need to be upgraded. 13 Attachment 8 IVI in 0 To: Mr. Ken Roberts V4000 APR From: Deputy Chief Banick J 9 CC: Chief Thomalla RECEI V Date: 4/11/2003 Re: PROJECT REVIEW —Front Line Church, 2055 White Bear Avenue have reviewed the attached project proposal and currently have the following concerns: 1. The section of White Bear Avenue from County Road B to Frost Avenue is becoming increasingly dangerous. Over the past year, we have had several serious rear-end traffic crashes in this area. Therefore, I am concerned that this project will. contribute to an increase in vehicular tragic in an area that cannot accommodate a large increase wi #hout roadway improvements. 2. I am also concerned about the safety and security of the patrons. Since this site is located adjacent to the Gateway Trail, !recommend that the current lighting plan be reviewed to ensure the safety of everyone. If you have questions, please contact meat ext. 4502. 1 14 RAMSEY COUNT`f Department of Public Works Kenneth G. Haider, P.E., Director and County Engineer ADMINISTRATIONA AND SURVEY 50 West Kellogg Blvd., Suite 910 St. Paul, MN 55102 • ( 651) 266 -2600 * Fax 266 -2615 E -mail: Public.Works@co.ramsey.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Ken Roberts City of Maplewood FROM: Dan Sole 2 - nty Ramsey C Public Works SUBJECT: Frontline Church 2055 White Bear Avenue DATE: April 22, 2003 Attachment 9 ENGINEERING /OPERATIONS 3377 N. Rice Street Shoreview, MN 55126 (651) 484 -9104 • Fax 482 -5232 The Ramsey County Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed conditional use permit and site plan for Frontline Church at 2055 White Bear Avenue. Ramsey County has the following comments regarding this proposal. 1. The applicant, Frontline Church, is proposing to use a portion of a building on this site. Several businesses and a school occupy the remainder of this building. The space proposed by the church was previously occupied by a business as office space. This change in use is not anticipated to create operational problems on White Bear Avenue. Trip generation will be at off peak hours from that on White Bear Avenue. 2. This site is currently served by one access point to White Bear Avenue and a back access point to Prosperity Street. Access to the site will remain the same after the change in use. This access should be adequate for the proposed church. ' 3. The proposed project should not require any permits from Ramsey County. The project is anticipated to utilize existing utilities and should not affect the White Bear Avenue roadway right of way.. Thanks for the _opportunity to make comments regarding this issue. If you have any questions or need . any additional information please give me ,a calla 15 APR 2 r14 , 2003 Minnesota's First Home Rule County printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post - consumer content ......... " . " .. . I:OIIMCY AFSCME wan u.tl Attachment 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Bill ArTi representin Frontline Church, is re that Maplewood approve a conditional use permit for a church to operate in an existin office/ware house buildin WHEREAS, this permit applies to the propert at 2055 White Bear Avenue. The le description is: SABIN GARDEN LOTS, SUBJECT TO ROAD; EXCEPT PART OF LOTS- 4, 5 & 6 BLK 6 DESCRIBED AS COM AT SW CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 THEN NELY ON WESTERLY LINE SAID LOT 6 FOR 28 FT TO' BEG; THEN SELY PAR TO SOUTHERLY LINE SAID LOT 6 FOR 391.56 FT THE NELY DEF LEFT 90 DEGREES FOR 263.26 FT THEN NWLY DEF LEFT 90 DEG FOR 270.39 FT TO POINT ON WLY LINE SAID LOT 4 SAID POINT BEING 318 FT NE OF SAID SW CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 THE SWILY TO BEGINNING; THE FOLLOWING PART OF SAID LOTS 4.5 & 6 . LYING SLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT POINT ON WL SAID LOTS 368 FT NLY FROM SW CORNER SAID LOT 6 THEN SELY TO POINT ON EL OF SAID LOT 5 SAID POINT BEING 368 FT NORTH FROM-SE CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 & THERE TERMINATING ( PIN 15-29-22-11-0050) WHEREAS, the histor of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On April 21, 2003, the plannin commission recommended that the cit council approve this permit. 2. On Ma 12, 2003, the cit council held a public hearin The cit staff published a notice in the paper and sent n to the surroundin propert owners. The council g ave ever at the hearin a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the cit staff and plannin commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the council approve the above-described conditional use permit based on the buildin and site plans. The cit approves this permit because: 1. The use would be located, desi maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformit with Maplewood's Comprehensive -Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not chan the existin or planned character of the surroundin area. 3. The use would not depreciate propert values. 4. The -use would not involve an activit process, materials, e or methods of operation that would be dan hazardous, detrimental, disturbin or cause a nuisance to an person or propert because of excessive noise, g lare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, draina water run-off, vibration, g eneral unsi electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would g enerate onl minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic con or unsafe access on existin or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served b ade public facilities and services, includin streets, police and fire protection, draina structures, water and sewer s schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. H L011 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.. 10. The city council may waive any of the above requirements provided the council determines that the balancing of public interest between governmental units would be best served by such a waiver. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans dated March 20, 2003, as approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed church must be started in this location within one year after council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The church shall meet the requirements of the city building official and the fire marshal. In addition, city staff shall determine the maximum capacity of the church upon review of the final floor and building plans. 4. The property owner or manager shall sweep and restripe the parking lot before the church occupies their space. 5. The city council shall review this permit in one year. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 2003. 17 Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 04 -21 -03 Ther "were no audience members that wanted to speak ' p ak on this issue.. Commis loner Pearson moved to adopt the resolution on a e 4 of the sta ff p g Update. aff repo .This resolution approves he proposed Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Commission r Ledvina seconded. Ayes - Desai Dierich Fischer, �e vi - Y � , d na, Monahan Junek, Mueller, Pearson, Roassbach, Trippler The motion pass VI. NEW BUSINESS a. Street Right -of -Wa ; Vacations — Maplewood Middle School (Holloway a nd Lakewood) Mr. Roberts said Ron Parr ci Director of B requesting Bu siness Services for School District 622, is requesti .that the city co.u,ncil.- vacate t street treet rights- of -wa on the Maplewood Middle School property. The reason for the requested vac � p a is that one Avenue right-of-way lies in the l canon of the school. The other, Frisbie A enue, lies ithin the athletic fields, Both are dead-end rights -of- ways that are not needed for stree or utility /purposes i . The applicant wants to vacate these � pp streets since there s no reason to keep them o /record. Commissioner Dierich asked how often oes it happen that right-of-ways pp et are vacated and are needed years later? Mr. Roberts said it has happ n'ed in the past nd it would not be difficult to request that property q owners dedicate new right- -ways with new de elopment plans. p Comm.issionerRossba moved to approve the resolution • pp ution on page 6 for vacation of the Tierney Avenue and Frisbie enue street rights -of -way at Ma ewood Middle School. The reas on for these - ;vacations is that th re is no public purpose in retaining m. g Commissione earson seconded. Ayes Die ` h F' ' Y Fischer, Ledvina, Monahan Junek, Mueller, Pe son, 9ossbach, Trippler Them ion passed. ii§ item goes to the city council on May 12, 2003. b. Frontline Church Conditional Use Permit — 2055 White Bear Avenue Mr. Roberts said Mr. Bill Arrigoni, representing Frontline Church is proposing too en p p g p a church in the existing ASI office /warehousing building at 2055 White Bear Avenue. This would be a new location for the church that is now operating in Roseville on Hamline Avenue. To have e the .church in this location, Mr. Arrigoni is asking that Maplewood approve a conditional use permit pp p (CUP), The Maplewood City Code requires a CUP for churches and laces of worship. As proposed, p p p posed, the school would lease about 11,500 square feet of space in the existing 82,0 ware -foot bui ' . g q building.- M r. Roberts said the church would use their space primarily on Sunda morni p Y y g and on Wednesday evenings. These times would not conflict with the other tenants- in the buildin as the use t g y er spaces primarily during the day on weekdays. Planning Commission Minutes of 04 -21 -03 Commissioner Rossbach said he understood the building was being leased. He asked staff if that meant the building was still on the tax roll? Mr. Roberts said that was his understanding. g Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to address the commission. Mr. Bill Arrigoni, the Senior Pastor for Frontline Church residing t 1394 Hilltop Ridge, g p Houlton, Wisconsin, addressed the commission. Commissioner Rossbach asked Mr. Arrigoni where the Frontline Church is located? Mr. Arrigoni said Frontline Church is currently located at 2819 Hamline Avenue in Roseville in a shopping center that is owned by Kraus - Anderson. The shopping in center has been sold to Presbyterian Homes, and the shopping center will be torn down in a few months. Commissioner Rossbach asked what the size of the congregation currently was? Mr. Arrigoni said their. congregation was now at 100 people. Commissioner Desai said he read in the staff report that the primary activities happen on Wednesday evenings and Sunday mornings. He inquired if that meant there were no other activities held at the church during the week? Mr. Arrigoni said normal office activities happen during the day and in the evening there pp g y g ere are small prayer meetings but there are not entire church meetings or gatherings. Commissioner Trippler said the memo from Deputy Chief Banick stated he was concerned about the safety and security of the patrons and he recommended the lighting plan be reviewed. He asked the applicant if he was aware of these situations? Mr. Arrigoni said no, he was not aware of Mr. Banick's comments. Mr. Arrigoni said however, he has discussed increasing the lighting in the area with the owners of the building. 9 Commissioner Trippler said Deputy Banick's memo stated that there had been -an increase in year- end traffic crashes in the area. He asked if Mr. Arrigoni has been made aware of that? Mr. Arrigoni said no he was not. Commissioner Mueller asked if their intention was to own _a building and move the congregation or is the plan to continue leasing space? Mr. Arrigoni said they will have a five -year lease at this location but their ideal situation would be to buy land and build a church, but that is out of their budget right now. Commissioner Desai asked if there was an existing sprinkler system in the warehouse building nd i g was t compatible for the amount of people that will be in the building? Planning Commission -5- Minutes of 04 -21 -03 Mr. Arrigoni said there is a sprinkler system. He said the will be working with the Fire Y g Mar throughout the renovation process to ensure the sprinkler system is compatible for the amount of people that would occupy the space. Commissioner Pearson moved to adopt the resolution on pages 15 and 16 in the staff report. This resolution approves the conditional use permit or Frontline Church to operate in the building .. i f F g at 2055 White Bear Avenue. Maplewood bases this permit on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans dated March 26, 2003,' as approved b the city. The pP Y Y director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed church must be started in this location within one ear after council app roval y pp orthe permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline .for one year. 3. The church shall meet the requirements of the city building official and the fire marshal. In addition, city staff shall determine the maximum capacity of the church upon review of the final floor and building plans. 4'. The property owner or manager shall sweep and restripe the parking lot before the church occupies their space. 5. The city council shall review this permit in one year. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes — Desai, Dierich Fischer Ledvina Monahan -Junek Mueller, Pearson, Rossbach, Trippler The motion passed. This item goes to the city council on May 12, 2003. c. County Road Dt�ension Right -of -Way Study (Hazelwood t�ghway 61) Mr. Chuck Ahl, Public Works irectorat the City of Maplewoo ave another presentation regarding g g the County Road D Extension ht -of -Way Study from azelwood to Highway 61. He said it's recommended that the planning c mission review a all nment o p tions and the storm water g management and wetland mitigation p for the C. my Road D Realignment Project (City Projects 02 -07 and 02 -08) and table making a rec r�.e dation until May 5, 2003. Mr. Karl Keel of URS gave a presentat' on the oadway alignment issues. Mr. Ron Leaf of Short Elliott He ickson gave a prese ation on the storm water wetland plan. Commissioner Dierich asked Mr. Ahl, which of the road align nt options is fla ed b staff as the � gg Y preference . Mr. AN said Mr. :eel said the preference was option W1. A AGENDA REPORT AGENDA REPORT Action by Council TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager Date FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer Endorsed Modified SUBJECT: County Road D Extension (Hazelwood to TH 61) — City Project 02- We'ected ' County Road D Extension West of TH 61 — City P - - ( ) y ro ject 02 08 -- ......� Public Hearing: 8:00 pm 1. Resolution Selecting Alignment Options for Final Right of Way Acquisition 2. Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Preliminary Report 3. Resolution Adopting Storm Water and Wetland Mitigation Plan DATE: May 6, 2003 Introduction The realignment of County Road D between Hazelwood and TH 61 and also from TH 61 to Highrid e g Court has been discussed for over 16 months. Various alignments have been discussed and debated at recent meetings. On April 28, 2003, the city council confirmed that they do not wish to study other alignment options. Our engineering team has presented a number of the refinements of the alignment (issues within 50 feet of the selected alignment) and the storm water /wetland planning issues for consideration and discussion at the April 14 and April 28 city council meetings. The lannin - p Y g p g commission has also reviewed any land use issues that may be impacted by the final refined alignment and have provided a recommendation to the city council on a recommended alternative. Upon selection of a preferred alignment, the city council should authorize preparation of the preliminary report on the feasibility of construction. Additionally, the city council should consider the Storm Water and Wetland Plan as a guidance document for the area projects. Background On December 9, 2002, the city council approved a resolution to proceed with a project to realign g County Road D from Hazelwood Street to TH 61 at the Venburg Tire intersection and then n Count realign Road D west of TH g County 61 through the vacant property to the existing alignment on the east side of the Highridge Court development. That resolution was the culmination of man hours of discussion and Y debate with staff, agencies, other communities and property owners. A number of conclusions were reached in selecting the alignment and project approach. Project and Alignment Findings /Conclusions • A detailed alignment study was prepared over a 16 -month period. • The alignment report studied eight options and concluded that the best traffic option considering mall traffic would be a direct connection of County Road 'D to 1 -694. • Approval of alignments with direct connections to 1 -694 were concluded to have negative impacts to TH 61 and 1 -694 and were unlikely to be approved by MnDOT or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). • Mitigating the impacts of the direct connections would exceed $12.0 - $15.0 million dollars. These would likely require 8 -15 years to receive approval and construct and would like) require a development • • y r e <25% q elopment moratorium in the Mall area. This mitigation planning effort has a likelihood of being approved by FHWA under the best circumstances. • An alternative alignment south of existing County Road D has been shown to significantly g y improve Mall area traffic flow without the negative impact to traffic flow on TH 61 and 1 -694. MnDOT and Ramsey County concur and support. this finding. • This alternative alignment has wetland impacts that must be mitigated. The mitigation plan provides for a n enhancement of the wetlands and storm water treatment within the area. • Studies show that a realigned County Road D will adequately accommodate the traffic from Legacy Village past 2010 and will coordinate with the improvements to TH 61 and 1 -694 that MnDOT is planning for 2011 -2015. • Legacy Village will help pay the $6.0 million cost of realigning County Road D. City Council Agenda Background County Road D Realignment And Storm Water/Wetland Plan May 6, 2003 Page Two Study Information The city council has previously been provided with a set of drawings (with a green cover) titled County Road D Alignment Options. The first sets of attachments are maps of various alignment options. The alignment options are shown as W -1 and E -1 through W -4 and E -5. This means that there are four options west of TH 61 shown on the various drawings and five options shown east of TH 61. Also included are options for intersection crossing at TH 61 that have varying impacts on the area businesses and property owners. Following each option is a listing of issues that begins to identify the land use impacts and opportunities, along with the identified positives and negatives of each alignment option. A summary of the alternatives will be provided at the meeting. Some key recommendations of the alignment options are: East & TH 61 • A 35 mph roadway is strongly recommended east of TH 61 to accommodate the projected traffic expected to utilize this roadway. • Wetland impacts can be mitigated with slight alignment considerations. The wetland impacts are to lower quality wetland areas and can be mitigated with larger areas of higher quality wetlands in the project area. • Conflicts with the railroad berm and a future trail crossing need to be considered near Hazelwood. • - Adequate sight distance is needed at the new Hazelwood and County Road D intersection. • The roadway should be located 1.00 feet south of the wetland area to allow for establishment of a buffer area to protect the higher quality wetland area. • Alternative E -5 is the staff recommended option and is the least costly of the options considered, although most of the options are considered relatively equal in cost. West of TH 61 • Existing single- family homes can be avoided with some alignment options. • The wetland area near Highridge Court is a lower quality wetland that can be mitigated with a larger wetland complex of higher quality. Reestablishment of storm water treatment areas near this area may provide the desired .property owner requirements for screening and natural area. • An alignment conducive to the development needs of the area should provide an opportunity for residential land use on the west side of the. new roadway and commercial / business land use of the east side of the new roadway. Currently the vacant property is planned for manufacturing -type uses. • New development coordination is likely required to avoid lengthy and expensive property acquisition costs. • Alternative W -1 is the staff recommended option and is relatively the least costly of the options considered due to the lack of homeowner relocation impact. TH 61 — New Alignment Intersection • Any option will impact some existing property owner /business. • A 90- degree intersection is desirable but not required. An 80- degree approach is acceptable. • Coordination with future development of the Gulden's site and the vacant Kami property (formerly the Frattalone property) is needed to finalize the exact alignment. • Avoidance of the Lexus property is preferable due to the. limited parking and potential wetland impacts of parking area mitigation. • A partial property taking at Venburg Tire may result in full taking of the property. The business, Venburg Tire, is leasing the building and is considering relocating, possibly to the Gulden's property. It may be possible to provide the existing Venburg Tire site with compensating property to the south of their existing site to offset the taking. • Intersection Option #2 is the staff recommended alternative and is likely to be the least costly alternative when combined with the property acquisition and development issues. City Council Agenda Background County Road D Realignment And Storm Water/Wetland Plan May 6, 2003 Page Three Storm Water and Wetland Management Plan The city council has previously received a copy of the report on the storm water and wetlands management for the area. This report is a requirement of the AUAR process. It identifies the amount .of wetland mitigation that will occur, along with enhanced protection measures within the Legacy Village project that will help the city implement storm water management and wetland protection measures throughout both the Legacy Village and County Road D projects. If adopted, this plan will serve as a guide for wetlands management and storm water planning for this area for the next 7 -10 years. Some key recommendations from the plan include: • Six wetlands of lower quality will be impacted by the Legacy Village development and the County Road D realignment project. • Mitigation of these six wetland impacts will provide over twice the area of wetland complex of a much h' p uc higher quality and value than current wetlands. • Runoff volumes will be treated at a much higher level than current conditions and will exceed city and watershed standards. • Treatment and infiltration standards within the Legacy Village development will be established to enhance the overall treatment systems. Planninq Commission On May 5, 2003, the Planning Commission reviewed the alignment report and storm water and wetland plan. The Commission voted 5 -0, with one abstention, to recommend approval of Options E- 5 W -1, and Intersection Option #2, along with .adoption of the Storm Water and Wetland Mitigation Plan. The commission also voted 4 -2 to recommend to the city council that additional study is needed to identify traffic patterns and mitigation efforts on local streets around the Maplewood Mall area. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions which approve Alignment Options E -5 and W -1 as the final alignment, along with Intersection Option 2, as the final alignment for the County Road D Realignment Project (City Projects 02 -07 and 02-08); adopt the resolution authorizing preparation of the Preliminary Report for the County Road D Improvement Project both east and west of TH 61; and adopt the resolution adopting he Storm g Water Management and Wetland Mitigation Plan. RCA 1W Attachments: Alignment Options Report (previously provided to the Council) Storm Water and Wetland Mitigation Plan (previously provided to the Council) Memo Report from URS to Charles AN Property Owner Letters Approval Schedule Resolutions (3) Planning Commission Minutes from May 5, 2003 (to be distributed on May 12) J MEMORANDUM Thresher Square 700 Third Street South Minneapolis, MN 55415 Phone: (612) 374 -0700 Fax: (612) 370 -1378 To: Charles Ahl, PE - Copy. File: Director of Public Works From: Karl Keel, PE Date: April 29, 2003 Subject: County Road D Alignment Options -- Planning Commission Review City Project 02 -07, 02 -08 Background As part of the City of Maplewood's efforts to address traffic concerns in and around the Ma lewood p Mme, preliminary plans are being developed to reconnect County Road D to TH 61. A report, "Alignment Stud p � Y and Report for County Road D Realignment" (December 2002), was completed that reviewed a wide range of County Road D realignment options. On December 9, 2002, the Maplewood Ci ty Council selected a preferred alignment that generally is located along the north edge of the Country view Golf Course south of e Xcel Energy Substation and connects with existing County Road D east -of Hazelwood Street. The preferred alignment also realigns County Road D west of TH 61 to TH 61 north of Gulden's Restaurant and Venburg Tire. .Since December an Environmental Assessment worksheet (EAW) was re are circulated an a p p � pp ed for the preferred alignment. In addition., a number of refinements were prepared to the referred all t p � en approved by the City Council on December 9 2002. These refinements are summarized in an exhibit titled "County Road D Alignment Options" dated April 2003. During the discussion and review of the alignment options, if was recognized that the final ali n game t selection will have a significant impact on future land use in the project area. Considering hat a number ber of large parcels impacted by the proposed alignments are anticipated to develop r redevelop in the n p p ear future, the City commissioned. URS to review .land use options associated with the ro osed roadway alignment p p y project. This memo is a summary of the findings of this review to support discussion of the roadway ay alignment options. Once an alignment has been selected., a formal amendment to the Com rehensi p ve Plan and Zoning Code, if needed, will be prepared for Planning Commission and Cit ouncil consideration- on. General Description of Land Use and Realigned Count Road � y ad D The study area between I -694 and Beams Avenue is ex, eriencm' si � g gmficant redevelopment with the following land uses: • New single - family and townhomes west of Maplewood Drive (TH 6I) alon g g g Hi hrid e Court, Duluth Street, and Carey Heights Driver. 4 Page 1 • Expansion of automobile related uses along Maplewood Drive (TH 61), including automobile dealerships, an auto body shop, and Lire store. New senior housing along Hazelwood Street. • A proposal for a major new mixed residential and commercial development to the east of Hazelwood Street and south of County Road D, known as the Legacy Village project. • Potential development of a vacant parcel to the west of Maplewood Drive (TH 6 1). Mai or and minor constraints in the study area include: • Significant areas of wetlands and poor soils, including small wetlands along the southern edge of the existing County Road D. a large wetland area owned by the watershed District in the muddle of the stud Y area, and poor soils on the Country View Golf Course. • An Xcel Energy power substation, which requires access to a railroad spur in the Bruce Vento Trail Corridor in order to switch out transformers, and associated power lines and towers. • An existing tire store, a proposed tire store site, and an existing automobile dealership at the ro osed P p intersection of the realigned County Road D and Maplewood. Drive. • Existing single - family homes fronting County Road D, west of Maplewood Drive. • Zoning regulations constrain automobile related land uses, such as dealerships or maintenance es ara g g within 350 feet of existing or planned residential areas. General Land Use Planning Concepts All of the options share certain common elements and the suggested land use options follow these g eneral concepts: • Highway commercial, especially automobile related uses are most appropriate along Maplewood. Drive (TH 61). • Residential uses are appropriate west of the new County Road D in the area west of Maplewood Drive (TH 61). • Business Commercial is appropriate along Beam. Avenue between Maplewood Drive (TH 61) and Hazelwood Street. • Higher density residential is appropriate to the south of the new County Road D between Maplewood Drive (TH 6I) and the Bruce Vento Trail. • wetland areas should be conserved as green space. Replacement wetlands and, new storm water facilities should be designed as amenities to exiting and future land uses. • Urban design amenities should be created along the two -lane 'S' curve portion of the new road west of Maplewood Drive (TH6 1) to create an attractive buffer between proposed residential and proposed commercial development_ 5 Page. 2 It would be appropriate for the City to consider reducing the setback of 3 5 0 feet between the ro osed p p new residential uses `vest of the new County Road D and proposed automobile uses east of the new alignment. Land Use Discussion in Relation to the Realignment Options. The area where the options vary most is the 'S' curve west of Maplewood Drive. The amount of land to the west or.east of the new road varies in relation to how the road curves and where it is aligned.. The discussion below is limited to land use issues. A table summarizing the relative benefits and disadvantages of each option is attached. Option "w -1 ". In option w -1, the realignment leaves approximately two- thirds of th pp y e land to the east of the new road, roughly 475 feet, and one -third to the west, roughly 200 feet. This distribution may be acceptable Y p for creating residential development to the west of the road, however, the 200 feet may be somewhat shallow. This option has a major impact on the small wetland east of Highridge Court but allows the existin g single- le- family homes along County Road D to remain. option "W -2 ". In option w -2 the realignment creates a very large undivided piece of lan rY g p d between the new road and Maplewood Drive, roughly 750 feet. This is too large for any single uses without additional roadway development. Such a configuration also precludes residential to the west of the road or any other use of that space. Option "'T -3" Option 3 creates a balance between land to the west and east of the new roadway. The potential residential space to the west of the road is approximately 280 feet, while the p otential commercial space is also deep enough for a variety of uses. This option also provides an opportune to serve exist g commercial properties along TH61 from the west — thus allowing exiting access from TH61 to be removed. The elevation of the new roadway, however, would require redevelopment and regrading of these properties in order to take advantage of this access opportunity. �' g p P Impacts to the small wetland are avoided. Existing single - family homes along Coup Road D are heavil impacted. � y Option "'W-4 ". option w -4 is nearly the same as w=3, with a balance between land to the west and east f 0 the new roadway. The potential residential space to the west of the road is approximately 286 feet while the pp Y , potential commercial space is also deep enough for a variety of uses. Impacts to the small wetland are avoided. Option E -1— E-5. The main issue of land use to the east of Maplewood Drive is the potential redevelopment of the existing golf course. Craven the excellent visibility along Beam Avenue business commercial uses are appropriate. The amount and timing of such development depends on the market for new retail and office in the area. Given the large wetland conservancy to the north of the new Coup Road D land along g the northern portion of this site may be best uses as higher density residential with units offerer views into o the wetland. A mayor issue on this site is the large area of poor soils, which may limit the development Y p potential. The eastern options vary slightly in the i:�npacts to wetland areas. Option E -1 has the lar p Best impact on wetlands owned by the watershed District and a small wetland at the corner of County Road D band Hazelwood Street._ options E -2 and E -4. have a smaller impact on wetlands but create access robl p ems to the xcel Energy property from. the railroad spur. Option E -3 may allow access to the Xcel Ener while have a small impact on wetlands. Op property' p pons E -2, E -3 and E -4 reduce the design speed of the roadway to 30 MPH. Considering the proposed CSAH designation of the roadway and the need to efficiently m ove ove traffic, a design speed of less than 35 MPH may not be desirable. 6 .gage 3 Option E -5 is a refinement of Option El. This option provides a minimum design speed of 35 MPH. The intersection with Hazelwood Street is located to provide adequate site distance from a future pedestrian bridge along the Bruce Vento Trail Corridor. It also allows for a future rail spur to the Xcel Energy substation. On the negative side, this option impacts the lower quality wetland at the comer of County Road D and Hazelwood Street and requires the removal of a larger segment of the rail embankment that provides screening to the senior housing complex on Hazelwood Street. Recommended Alignments West ofMaplwood Drive (TH61) Option W -1 is the preferred alignment for the following reasons: 0 Provides reasonable depth development arcels on both the east and p west of the new roadway • Proposes residential development west of the new roadway rovides a good buffer t p g o existing residential development to the west. Allows exiting single- family homes along County Road D to remain. g tY ain. The major disadvantage of this option is that it requires fillip of the exiting wetland. g g Wetland impacts, however, would be mitigated by new .higher quality wetlands to be constructed at a ratio afro of 2. 1. East ofMaplewood Drive (TH 61) Option E -5 is the preferred alignment for the following reasons: • Maintains a minimum 35 MPH design speed. • Allows for a future rail spur to be constructed to the Xcel Energy substation- Adequate site distance (420') is provided between the new signalized intersection � at Hazelwood Street and a future pedestrian bridge along the Bruce Vento Trail Corridor. Disadvantages to this option include increased wetland impacts and removal of a p portion of the railroad embankment that screens existing land uses to the east. 7 Page 4 "East" Segment Alignment Option Comparison E'� Page 5 _ _ it. . t - - - =l Y 4 y. - d 0 - 4 F A 3 5 MPH roadway design • More wetland impact • rood sight distance at • Potential bridge/intersection Hazelwood connection conflict • old Co. Rd. D not connected E -2a Minimum wetland impact p : 3 0 MPH roadway ' adway design • Maximum protection of railroad • Clo se ro to Xcel substation P � berm — Requires removal of rail Developable Schrier property • Allows connection to old Co. Rd_ D • Avoids potential conflicts between si al and powerlines E - 2b • Minimum wetland impact • 30 APH roadway design gn • Allows connection to old Co. • Clo se roximi. P tY to Xcel substation Rd. D — Requires removal of rail . • Increases Legacy Village project a May require at-grade trail crossing q � g at Hazelwood E -3 • Minimum wetland impact ' • 30 MPH roadway design y � • Avoids potential conflicts • Removes a large portion of g P between signal and powerlines railroad berm • No connection to old Co. Rd. D E -4 • Minimum wetland impact • 30 MPH roadway desi • Maximum protection of railroad • Complicated bridge /signal desi berm • Potential cut-through on Co. Rd. • Allows connection to old Co. D to TH6 I . Rd. D (signalized} Close r ' p oxvmity to X ce l Substati • Avoids potential conflicts between'signal.And powerlines E -5 • 3 5 MPH roadway design • More wetland impact p • Good sight distance at • Loss ©f'Railroad Berm Iazelwood connection o No Bridge/Intersection Conflict E'� Page 5 "West" Segment Alignment Option Comparison - r - #0S �.iii�� _ - Y .. r. - - t. . F V iF r - _t W -1 • Avoids single family homes • wetland impact on Co_ Rd. D • urn depth (200') west of • only I property acquisition roadway along Co. Rd. D • : Comfortable depth east of roadway • Allows for future redevelopment along D • Meets developer's expectations W-2 • Largest parcel east of • wetland impact roadway along TH 61 + Lost property west of roadway • Strip west of roadway acts + Depth of east parcel (750') may as buffer to single family require additional roadways • Least impact to existing single family homes along Co. Rd. D • Good access to Lametti property behind Gulden's W-3 • No wetland impact • Requires acquisition of 3 single • Allows development family properties around wetland + Requires large wall or grading • Balances size of on Sparkle: property or lowering development lots east and of pipeline (increased cost) west of roadway • Access provided to Sparkle Auto Dealership property (if redeveloped) W-4 • No wetland Impact • T- intersection on C SAH • Balances Size of • Need to screen single family y Development Lots East and property north of Co. Rd. D West of Roadway • Noise/Pollution at stop sign gn • Requires acquisition of only 1 single family home alone Co. Rd. D • Traffic calming on Co. Rd. D 'would be supported by immediate neighborhood 9 Page 6 fig 61 Intersection Alignment Option Comparison ' :may •: - T - -uyit _ .. , •ice: � '= .. f' .' ^ _ cr a -i' _ U F F -/ :. %. .^,. • c _ nil .;. ,'.%M1 ^ — k ^ • Acquisition from Roes not allow new lot at number of parcels G`rulden's (Venburg and Guldens) • Intersection at slight skew Moves as far north as • RQw acquisition from 4 possible without 'significant properties impacts to Lex-us • 90 degree intersection • Allows for new Gulden" s lot 3 • Spreads impact equally to • Significant impacts to numerous all properties (roadway parcels centered on property line) • Intersection at slight skew • Least impact to Venburg more wetland impact Tire 10 Page 7 :.I rte- •. +1 ,. • • • X00 - Hudson BI-7j Sure 245 KFLc Oakdale I�i� 5I-8 5 0 . . .. - Office: [6J1 730.• -2 e - Re i'stc to Develo�apne Se� es r 1 March 26 2003 - . Holm r . &7 ASSvcIaLe lac . { Suite '45N 2550 University Avenue west St- Paul, N 5 . - County Raad D Extension - _ Ei City of Ma:Plewood - - a _ Project 02-08 Trout 1 L LC you' for forward o- the fve o _ - • _ _ _ _ _ _ : . ptLons that are being discussed for the exte Road D west of' wa ns�on : of Cahn Highway 1 in the City of �a lewoc) - - t h e pl _ P . , . I also appreciate our .info annln rnr�a ., Co �' me � o s 5z f a on and C�fiy Caunc �zeet3ng dates_ ?lease charge _ let. me know if these dates do The followi�E constitute fhe comments - T - Of Trout-at ap�-oxiu�ately .�- acres d3recd as owner of that land of - y west of 1�� �hway 61 which wR.1 be impacted ay required for the extension of Coun by the r i g ht- O f- . _ County Road D . . Option 1�1: 'This rim • . - . �t - �� way ��ment rno st cIo s e . had anticipated. This is best r closel follows the ah whi alternative far us, by ch rar. P la this aii�ent the no .� rth/south eleraent . of Coup: Road D east winch 1imits tshe amount of laud ava ilable s Sher to the ailable to us an the east s�.cie of the :creases tie land an the west side which • - - aeunent and 1s cones to the evelOpmcnt re eMents for tarcel. uir r qe Opn on 3�! j , This ah - _ moment absolutely con± to our ab z - . �e Property. Ia she Erst lace_ th e area r T zy t o suedzvlde aad utilize _�.sz �r the new aliment become - _ not developable_ we wand e re that. �" - S z °ray -sable and she City ac and s A , -� quu�e t� 1 =om u as o s .0 a�iL,Q that E woul be useless to US. - Al s o beM so acvt ely , the b a.Iannce of th e becomes - _ land to the ast < < e� _ ii . ZonHx-n- March 26- 200-D - Pacre 2 . . very Ial acid - would h - - r ave to be subdlv�.ded into at least your lots additional service road which would probably re ` qu s to Provide access �er eby rnan� �- r P Ject econaml.cally feasible. _ _ Option ;�4: This also o is an unacceptable option foj us _ Tie l _ a went i� too lar� e and the.1 T. and to west of the new _ , and to the east of the ah�znent is too - - e��treznely d cult to 'develo the sue- �t mould be . p land on the west side of the new �: - be compatz`ble wiith the residential ahgnment In uses that would - _ _ entzal property f�.irther to the west � but developed as a senior' s co -o the land Is too lard e to be P aPartment development. The land left to the ea is also adversely hnPacted because it t st of the aliment with � _ o o small to b e prop edy d evelo ed for co '� . 1 �hway 61 fronta,e. P mmercial uses _ Option #S : This option. . . _ P n. as it = p acts the Trout Land roe . has all of the same negatives. Pry, Is snnzlar to Option 94 and There is no quest on that lion1 - OP vvM be- - the preferred option .. P by Trout Land, LLC. ��.or alternations to this such as. a minor reali ent of the intersec ' . north and. the location of the r tlon at IEghway 61 more to the ro adway egg acrQSS the north � � . fzlrth to the west o boundary line being somewhat - _ f Its configuration as drawn would be acceptable oz very much- appreciate the - opportuai for us to . _ n f l tur-e Ii t-of ova - pr vide our � e s #ith res ect to this r :. y_ �Obv�.ously 'has a si - _ P _ i gaii an net on our de" „. property and req uest a dip . ve1c�pfent plans for_ tie .. � _ scretionary rl.�t_ a royal 4n - - ' to cantinuin � - wor J • PP _ t}ie :anal aliment_ we Jo forward _ _ - -- � �� - c�ith the 'City va an effort to f n.d � - cojacerned.. _the best ah m ent :for a.11 P arties Respec ours _ y es E. KeUi.son - President JEIYjv . C. G-Onz.310 Medina/Trout Land., LLC R_ Ch Ahl1 _ City of Ma I' . P 12 - VENBURG TIRE CO rvis on o I =con-eorporaloir---- 2 990 Hwy. 61 North ---- ---- -- Maplewood, ALN 55) 109 651 651-483-288-1 . . 483 -2691 Fax March 28, 2003 . To: City 0 f Maplewood: Mayor Robert Members: 'C ueneinann Marvin. J , il • � Marvin Kopp City counc ers & Julie basil Fu.Ken Collins. Kathleen Director Chuck uk, CItY Manager Richard rsma engineering & PIa � n, Public Works _ a eptS . . Frarn: Pat & Carol McFarlane Venburg Tire Co. owners - - RE' County Rd. D Realignment Proj We would like to take . . this o ppo�mtY to share our sup p or t , . . Rd. D realignment project west of PPort of the City s recommendation for . Hw 6 Hwy 6I (the URS, Ine.'s I.an _ County 5' I and plan W -3 for the north proposed road. p w 2 proposal at the intersection ern part of that of Venburg Tire has been located ated at its present location for over 3 founded the company and we are 0 nears. Carol's father Keith . the owners of the business: W , . Venburg , building from Carol's b - e are current Ie brother Keith Venburg El. We em Y asmb the land and - s_are actively involved � Ploy I I full time a.nd: 4 art time this fam�y business and plan con - P staff. our • . .. ... P tmuation of the - thir d g eneration. The impact of all of the _ - l proposals for the pros ect east of Hwy. 61 severely inhibit us�. fro . Conduct business at that location. U m continu' . Upon early review of the proposal and thorou � ing to . - options, we feel it -is our best interes ex Ioratio ` � to move to a new Io cation. We h P n of our officials during the process. fihe I - have met several times w' loss -of t access to Hwy. 6I, Ions of "land ith City h.e age of our current and to the ne �-�.ty at our present site has lea w road, soil issues and d us to explore other options. We have been working with Mike state � &Brenda Gengler of � ulden's are. aPProx. I Y2 acres of the northern art of . d have an agreement to urchase - both excited about P their property to build a new . p about joint venture and have a ve of the art facility. We are - of the intersectio ssnmediatel we rY cooperative working relations relationshi w est of Hwy. 6I on the ci 's rot o p ahg=ent us to go forward with these laps, tY proposed sed plan the onl o do P y p n allowln Venburg Tire Co. and Gu - - Id.en s :appear to be. the only t(7 -a - ap erations are imp a.cted b co Y businesses in the project area whose interruption of our busin y nstnictZOn. We would like to ahQ out ose d.ay esses, fi' _ r proj eets so that Ong 2s crucial! Because of this s t there is no completion. of construction west of 4wy.'6 - , we ask that the cit � - - Q � _ 1 so that we can prepare tY g ive priority to P kin behind Guldens and proceed p pare soil corrections, develop d.d� P with _construction of our new build' � P itlonal _interruption of business to us at o mg This would ' throuff ur present site that would be ca u also avoid g h our parking lot while we are c sed by construction vehicles as ' ondu�g business. The tra.f�ic in pass treacherous and this could help void that area is already . there would b e - P unnecessary accidents . After compl . only na nor conflicts to surroun � pletion of our new building of Hwy. 6I. - �m businesses with the contra - -- . coon on the project east We appreciate your considers tZon or our conet7.s_ `ire are sup o - ~ Maplewood and the pro ce ss that T r P rive oI �t ? c im �ro�%en e . Son are e using- �f `you have a ny - - nt ror co n tact Ls at o� I- 4-$3 -26-01. _ y ues�ous, please do no hesitate to LEGACY VILLAGE AND COUNTY ROAD D EXTENSION APPROVAL SCHEDULE CRITICAL ITEM /TASK PROPOSED SCHEDULE "Uity t;ouncil — Alignment and April 14, 2003 Storm Plan/Wetland Review *Plan Comm.— Align Review April 21, 2003 * County Road D (west of TH 61) April 24, 2003 - Neighborhood Meeting *City Council — 2 °d Align Review April 28, 2003 *Vadnais Heights Planning Comm April 29, 2003 *Plan Comm Align Recommendation May 5, 2003 *Vadnais Heights City Council May 6, 2003 - Alignment Review /Comments *City Council —Adopt AUAR Final Doc May 12, 2003 - Approve Final Alignment - Adopt Storm and Wetland Plan - Authorize Preparation of Feas. Rpt, *Planning Comm and City Council — 6:00 pin - Legacy Village Review Session May 19, 2003 *City Council — Legacy Village 2" Review Session May 27, 2003 *Plan Comm — Legacy Village Recommend for-Approval June 2, 2003 City Council — Legacy Village Final Site Approvals June 9, 2003 *City Council — Approval of Legacy Bldg Plans June 23, 2003 *Pub Hrg for D &Kennard Projects June 23, 2003 14 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINAL ALIGNMENT FOR COUNTY ROAD D EXTENSION HAZELWOOD TO TH 61, CITY PROJECT 02 -07 TH 61 TO HIGHRIDGE COURT, CITY PROJECT 02 -08 WHEREAS, on December 9, 2002, the City Council selected an alignment for County Road D between Hazelwood Street and Trunk Highway 61 (TH 61) and between TH 61 and Highridge Court, City Projects 02 -07 and 02 -08, respectively, and WHEREAS, the City Council ordered preparation of an alignment study to finalize all issues related to the final right of way acquisition issues of the selected alignment, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer and URS, Inc. have presented the alignment study recommending various alignment options, and WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted numerous open forums and discussion sessions and has called a public hearing for May 12, 2003, to hear all concerned comments from citizens and property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. That Alignment Option E -5 from the URS Alignment Options Study is hereby established for the final alignment of County Road D between Hazelwood Street and Trunk Highway 61. 2. That Alignment Option W -1 from the URS Alignment Options Study is hereby established for the final alignment of County Road D between Trunk Highway 61 and Highridge Court. 3. That Intersection Alignment Option #2 from the URS Alignment Options Study is hereby established for the final alignment of County Road D at the intersection with Trunk Highway 61. RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to County Road D, from Hazelwood Street to Trunk Highway 61, City Project 02 -07 and to County Road D, from Trunk Highway 61 to Highridge Court, City Project 02 -08, and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he 'is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. FURTHERMORE, additional funds in the amount of $30,000 are appropriated to complete the feasibility report for Project 02 -07 and $30,000 are appropriated to complete the feasibility report for Project 02 -08. RESOLUTION ADOPTING STORM WATER AND WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) has been prepared for the Legacy Village at Maplewood development proposal, City Project 02 -18, that has identified impacts to wetlands and the public drainage systems, and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been approved for the extension of County Road D, from Hazelwood to TH 61, City Project 02 -07 and from TH 61 to Highridge Court, City Project 02 -08, that identified impacts to wetlands and the public drainage system, and WHEREAS, the City Council desired that wetlands and storm water drainage be enhanced within the area bounded by Beam Avenue on the south, Southlawn Drive on the east, Interstate 694 on the north, and Duluth Street on the west, and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed that a report be prepared detailing the system -wide approach to protect and enhance wetlands within said project area, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has directed the preparation of a report by SEH Engineers, Inc., titled Storm Water and Wetlands Plan for the Maplewood Mall Area Transportation Improvements, that provides long -term guidance for mitigation of wetland impacts and storm water drainage for the project area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That said project report is hereby adopted as proposed and the City Engineer is directed to implement the findings and recommendations of the study into the area project improvements and the proposed Legacy Village Development proposals. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Introduction Richard Fursman, City Manager Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer Action by Council Date - - Endorsed -- Modified Rejected English Street Improvements, City Project 01 -14 - Resolution Awarding Construction Contract for Roundabout Landscaping May 6, 2003 Bids for the landscaping of the English /Frost Roundabout have been received based on plans prepared by the city's consultant, SEH. Award of bids for the construction is recommended. ' Background On May 20, 2002, the city council approved a resolution awarding a construction contract for the English Street Improvements. Included in that project was the. construction of a roundabout at the English Street and Frost Avenue_ intersection. The project budget included an allocation of $50,000 toward landscape plantings and street light improvements at the Frost Avenue and English Street intersection area, both within the roundabout circle and on the exterior a pp roaches. The materials selected for the plantings and the streetlights will begin the process and set the tone for the redevelopment of this area. On February 24, 2003, the city council selected an option for the final appearance of the roundabout area based on a drawing of the recommended landscaping called an Evergreen Knoll. On March 31, 2003, the city council approved the final plans for the roundabout landscaping and set a bid date of May 2, 2003, for receipt of bids. Included in the bids were alternates that can be considered. The bids were opened as follows: Bid /Budget Analysis: The base bid is for the landscaping within the center of the roundabout. Alternate 1 would add plantings to the boulevards surrounding the roundabout. Alternate 2 includes a 2 -year maintenance package, including a guarantee - of - planting health, while Alternate 3 includes the addition of a sprinkler system into the area to continue to ensure the viability nd. health of the lant' y plantings. The original budget included a $50,000 allocation for this work. The project is currently slightly under budget and funds would be available to consider all alternates if desired. If , the only option is to do plantings just in the center of the roundabout, Magnum Company is the low bidder. However, since budget is available, the low bidder is Hoffman & McNamara in a total amount of $76,724. Hoffman & McNamara is a very qualified firm that will provide an excellent landscaping p g product and will take pride in maintaining the area. Award of the total package is recommended. (Boulevards) (2 -year Maint) (Sprinkler) Contractor Base Bid Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Alternate 3 Hoffman & McNamara $45,324.00 $13,050.00 $ 7 $11,000.00 Magnum Co. $42,920.90 $18,675.00 $11 $11,950.00 Ryan Contract $45,691.00 $15,435.00 $ $15,000.00 Engineer Est. $48,380.50 $27,248.00 $ 3 $10,000.00 Bid /Budget Analysis: The base bid is for the landscaping within the center of the roundabout. Alternate 1 would add plantings to the boulevards surrounding the roundabout. Alternate 2 includes a 2 -year maintenance package, including a guarantee - of - planting health, while Alternate 3 includes the addition of a sprinkler system into the area to continue to ensure the viability nd. health of the lant' y plantings. The original budget included a $50,000 allocation for this work. The project is currently slightly under budget and funds would be available to consider all alternates if desired. If , the only option is to do plantings just in the center of the roundabout, Magnum Company is the low bidder. However, since budget is available, the low bidder is Hoffman & McNamara in a total amount of $76,724. Hoffman & McNamara is a very qualified firm that will provide an excellent landscaping p g product and will take pride in maintaining the area. Award of the total package is recommended. City Council Agenda Background English Street Roundabout Landscaping May 12, 2003 Page Two Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution for the English /Frost Roundabout Landscape Improvements, Project 01 -14, awarding a construction contract in the amount of $76,724.00 to Hoffman & McNamara for the roundabout landscapin g and Alternates 1 and 3. jW Attachments 1. Resolution Awarding Construction Contract 2. Recommendation from Consultant a RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the roundabout landscaping improvements for English Street Improvements, Project 01 -14, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Hoffman & McNamara Magnum Co. Ryan Contract (Boulevards) Base Bid Alternate 1 $45,324.0'0 $13,050.00 $42,920.90 $18,675.00 $45,691.00 $15,435.00 (2 -year Maint) (Sprinkler) Alternate 2 Alternate 3 $ 7 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,950'.00 $ 6 $15,000.00 AND WHEREAS, the City Council desires to install boulevard plantings via Alternate 1, enter into a 2 -year maintenance agreement via Alternate 2, and install a sprinklers stem via Alternate 3 Y , AND WHEREAS, it appears that Hoffman & McNamara is the lowest responsible bidder for the base bid and a combination of Alternate 1, Alternate 2 and Alternate 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a construction contract in the name of the City of Maplewood for the Roundabout Landscaping Improvements for the English Street Improvements, City Project 01 -14, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ineer. 2. The city engineer is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. V hr-%" LI ! LJ M 6 2003 Butler Square Bldg, Ste 7100, 100 N 6th Street, Minneapolis, SIN 55403 -1 505 512.758.6700 612.756.5701 FAX �srshz ttur engineering - enoironmer ial - transportation RE City of aplewood English Street Improvements Frost En lish Roundab aut,andscaptng and Zgation City Project No. GI-14 SEH No, A - MAPLE02 3 l .00 M r. R. Charles ,W, P.E. Director of Public Works /City Engineer 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 551 On May 2.2003, at l I : a.m. three (3) bids were rec eived ' for t he a bove - referenced project. referenced The bids rare from a high of ��� for the base bid and al ran ged l three alt+emates to a low of $76, 724.00 for the base bid and all three aitemates. The low bid was submitted b Roffman & McNa mara, 'n .� arnar 9 Q�� � 8 t� t reed E Hastings, MN 55033. The bid tabulat is attached to thi's letter, The Engineers Estimate was for $75,975.50 for the base bid and all three alte mates. The low bra was I% higher than the estimate. It is recommended that al throe alternates be away ' ded The base bid included pl anting the median and the roundabout_ .alternate #1 was to lant trees in the a, p lanting the � �' boule�a.� the conc plan called for €� g bo trees, p roperty owners are expecting this lantin and iris will complete the landsca ins at this p g �alj�:�g these trees s significant intersection_ Alternate #2' was for a two-year m' aintenance o all plant materials and Alt�eznate #3 was for ,��i irrigation- � f g n '.ese two ai terna.tes are recommended so that th will have _ atit�r� will a project that will be. "re responsi 1 l tended and is the res onsi bilit €�f the _ con�€ractox to rnalntai in. for two e cit years. Irr m ake the: plant establishment permed more successful and will ensure watering mai ntenance for the future.. W e have investigated the qualifications of Hoffrniin & McNamara and � (1) . find �a� they have a sufficient understanding of the project and equipment to perform the constrktion for which � (2 ) c � h " �t bid, a according to their bonding agent they presently have the financial ability to cons fete � � p e proj bid. SOH rnak-es no representation or warranty as to the actual financial viabibt of the contractor or ` �' its ability to co�piete - its work. Accordingly we recommend the project be awarded to Hoffman &_ McNa in the amou of $76 for the base bid and all. three alternates. Please call me at 612.758 -6743 if . you have any questions, Sihcerely, Laurie McR cyst ie Landscape Architect, Project Manager C. - Denny McNamara Steve Beth, SEE k�sehinpislii :pli\:olnjapleNO20100\revised- final des gn_�0103\rcca%vard (.dac a c: . C13 0 to co 0 tL oa rL 0 .0 .9 T' 0- 0. 4- 0 , oi CD C) TM as 0 7- w - a j -, *. _ co U) 0 a. O Z: 6 < C%j 0 EL N • < >' � co 0 z 0 E o - m = a) o W:R M (L co im m 0 a400 a a 0 C:>Ooo a .0 0 0 a 0 Q 0 0 0 10 Q a 0 0 0 C> 0 0 00000c>00 0 00 0 0 Q CD U; N' 0* W^ 0, W" 0, Q, W, 0 CO c:) c� 6 'r- 0 zi 4 'r- c%j ui t6 (D in 666 - 0 0 a M 6o- 4& ' z 64 44 co 6R. CD IS , to5l 4& es 'z C\ F a,.A 6 a l 11 1.: lz cQ ol N 06 0 . 0 0 Q . 0 Iq Ln i1 a co fa 4113- VD. 6s 16% 6% 4a 60D- 40.). to �r_ iff 0 c> 0 o 0 C:koc>o Ok 0 Cl Cl 0 o 0 0 a o 0 0 a 0 0 C> 0 04D D 0 0 00 C3 0 0 I=> 0 C:> 0 0 00 0 o C) o. o w LO o o CJ M 6 6 c� 6 CQ 6 c� W 6 6 l4* 0 6 C> 0 N N N c� V- V- cki cl� T -r- ui -it d 99 >% ft 4& 0�1 6 C el> c i io ol.* WD. fr� 00 %6 ci C . Co C�o Ck 0 C3 C3 0 0 a a w w " r_• 0 LO w w 0 0 w N 0 0 I (Z3 CD 0 Cl w 0 0 w w 0 C3 0 10 in v LO 0 Co Lo LO 0 -Cr 0 0 c� r-- 40Q aoo C3 0 0 c; C; Ld C; 6 oi 140 W IT co Ica K N (0 6 LO "e to Lo' W W co M 0 v- ' ♦ c:)0 tO v-- c; 0; W d co c� .t 9 0 0 N M LO M W m N. 00 000 CD c; m c; W U Eft d 6"Mcp 0 IZ -,:, 6% 60- W *9� V3- Lf) 40 6% N. 69� 664. w LO 6446 In w '9- 4bPl w N 64 r- is ia N m CM M V.> V�. r- r" to 0 0 - - 0)- 0 - - w w - - 0 = - - 031- CNJ CO Lq w q U) m cm V- e9} V!} E!} ifl f& #{} 0 0 C> 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 1- 0 Ul) 1 r-. 0 U) I- (a o 0 a) M in 0 (3) Lf) 0 0 (Z) Q 0 0 Win to to 0 0 <> I- QD a 0 00 0 •L otr>tr�oo- 01 mw W <0 -aNrsi cm V* tf.:� cti 0; 6 fa -r- ui 6 6 10 0 (3) (N M 0 fff 7- 0 0- N M ff" 0 lq* d o 0 0 60:1� 1W. 40�_ 0 6% &9� (a CD T to 4*% 4W 0 900000000000000000000 0 C5 C5 0 ............ 0 0 CD c� c� 40 a c� 0 0 0 0 00000 00000000o= 00 C> 40 0840 0 0 Q vi 0 C) C> 8 0 . Lo w 6 6 vr C; 4 "Or 0 cm IP cv Q MI*- 9 w . -W 2 - w 8 2 o o 0000 o -06 9 600 CCX)ST-- N 0 Or- cQ !�� cow 0 0) U) Al 09 co ll� 43 CM 0 V- COO v- tft VC- 4 (IS to r.: c" IS 613 N 6s C\F LO OD r rz W K 4 V: co co r: ci f- W vz v- m Ar vz C*J" It t CJ' Cu L tt7 000 L6 co in" dpw 4l3 60 ta 40. CA, ia t4 6% 69 4 tPop. 69- 69> 40 k4 t 63 6 C . p 469 44 qr 46. 40%. 0 G7QOOOC�Q00 0 Q Q 0 0 0 0 C> 0 00 00 C;*p Lt) cip C:) 16 "q�r 6 6 "qr NT ci C\i V -r-- 6 ci c%3 V- c� 0 'r- N N" N' -r-- V-- -r- "' 0, 0, 8 ' 0* 6 g IrT 6 'cV -r- v- 6 c� 7- v- ci c� r- -r- 6 M 66 8 to m ert co co 40.* � , cm <& 411)- to coa. fa -(a 0), w 4a '.4 vq� 4a fo w 09, 00 C4 m No. to'). 6% GO #3 E/3 lb% 4090, fo 0 TZ 0 O0o C>O C) 100 00 10 0 0 C> a a a 0 8 0 o0c:)Co q 0 U- 0 CDC) i 0 U C) Oc�' 0 W, 000 q q q 0 i 0 0 (a Ln co t- m 00 co 1'%- r 0 0, o - c o 88 0 0 0 V E Q+ 6% f 03, �G& 69 6% 6-k 03. 6a. 0�. 0), NO to. 09� jr � 6% CIA W C%i C%T 6 c 't cm CM Z 7 I 1 cV -1 : 1-: _ r ' V� 40 000 4011. uu F.. 1 al C3 a c5 cl D 0 0 ci ci a c> o C> ci 6 a C . ) a C3 d ci CD CD 0 C) c; ui o 0 a 0 uj t6 CD a a 0 Ld id c► c> C) C> ui L6 o 0 0 0 L6 L6 c> o 0 0 6 6 0 0 6 0 D 0 0 6 6 10 a w w c6 c6 0 0 w m o6 cd 0 C) w ED 6 c6 0 0 ci o0 00 60 IM C c CS a W LO -'r 'r 0 -4- 4 4 • -ct 4 Va. ct -r- 4- w -r-- v- eq. V�' -r- v- w �U% v- v- eq V�. v- -v-- Z:� to CO CD VIF (v 0 6 Lo 4d- cr) 4& 4a 6c> 40.:� 6% 690 w 00 00 Ir 09- d fo>- Ir *19. k6 16% cm V3 to U) w WWWNM"qlO 0 CO W Lo Lo W m 0 w co "�t LO to 8 C9 0-8 Cl CV to ,�- ,- a) (D tv (a cc .9! U) cn Q) Q) C E: E: a U) CD 0 00 woo o m 0 m = N 0) (V G) (D IV 0. .0.0. 0- a. a. 0- a O. 0. 0. 0- a. ui 0 0 0 I — a m F- m Z .1P jr ul 0 c� < 0 A ) C LL 0 2 Z 0 m an in m co ob cm ft _>1 10 r- = ca *J - 0 0 0 E im CD 22 o 0 - a CL 'm :W. - ig 0 tn T_ co cv in w w co CL i. ifl 0 cm C L 0 0 :* 0 r I cm 0 (n rtC C) ro E .. 0 0 = 0 = -0 0 co 00 - Q M = (a W - c: 03 C aom ro 0 ig () o LL r m x (L o -2 co U) 0 0 LL a wo - 0 CL 72 C13 m a 0) a L U a) ca co _ 4t: fn 0.- 0() U) -a (o a.. 0 E\i � 0 - -. _ .0 (a 0 0 T3 TJ c: C. 0 - 4- io o Q CO A c -6 "0 - Z m - 0 .0 CEJ t �i A (is 0 0- od (1) > 2 - a) >= L W w cli 0 x 0 0 E 2 cu E cl) 6 E 00 EM CD cd - F_ 0) E cc '0 'a) E p (1 ) . CD d> M tA r a> E i� 2 0 0 w E %0 0 > 5, 0 E as 2 8 0 CO3 -0 IV . tv >' CU Z� 0 CO LL M tm 1! = 10 CD E N >1 0 0 0 CL C) 0 U 0 1.. 0 o co _Y_ c o S. 0 x 0 m F . C) i5L a ) 0 o >1 .0 t- (D Cu L - r .1 0 ra . 0 I.N C .0 d.F a C -0 cu f c: 0 f a 05 T C 2 a) 4CD 0 43 a c 3: f w _ "0 '.) co 3: (1) - q ;a U) 11) C - - 0 1 0 C = ty jD r- 1-- COLL 0) LL r_ fL 0 o U) -2- -0 0 O A F- CL 0 0-0 0 = o 0 :3 L L 0 - C, co = cd • a (d W a a) t: o J:, 0 L) © jr < < m co m y c L a z 0 LL (L 0- U) -1 z E C%J (v) " to Lo 'D t.- M M a N N Fes- N N N N co AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Cou TO: City Manager Dat � d FROM: - Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer M odified Erin Schacht, Civil Engineer 1 Rejected J ' SUBJECT: Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, Project 02 -10 Resolution Receiving Bids and Awarding Construction Contract DATE: May 12, 2003 Introduction Final plans and specifications for the Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements were approved by the city council on March 20, 2003, and authorization was given to advertise for bids. Those bids were received and opened on Friday, May 2, 2003. Background The bids were received and publicly read aloud at 10:00 a.m., on Friday, May 2, 2003. The following six bids were received: 1: T.A. Schifsky & Sons Bid A = $2,206,112.28 Bid B = $2,240,487.20 2. F.M. Frattalone Exc. & Grading Bid A = $2 Bid B = $2,607,925.13 3. Arnt Construction Co. Inc. Bid A = $2,584 Bid B = $2,625,181.16 4. Hardrives Bid A = $2,694,731.69 Bid B = $2,737,455.65 5. Midwest Asphalt Bid A = $2,824,866.95 Bid B = $2,868,410.29 6. Palda & Sons, Inc. Bid A = $ Bid B = $2,881,674.13 All bids have been checked and tabulated. The engineer's estimate for the project was $2,726,946.50. The low bid from T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. of $2,206,112.28 is 19% less than the engineer's estimate. Two alternates were bid under this project: Bid A included High Density Poly - ethylene Pipe (H.D.P.E.) for the storm sewer and Bid B included concrete pipe for the storm sewer. Both materials are acceptable for storm sewer construction. It is proposed to award Bid A for the H.D.P.E. storm sewer pipe since it is the less expensive of the two options. Discussion T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. has worked on several projects in Maplewood in the past. The previous two projects included English Street and County Road D in 2003. Both projects were satisfactorily completed. This is the second year that T.A. Schifsky and Sons has been under new management: Staff expects that they will be able to perform to the project schedule and contract specifications. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution accepting the bids and awarding the contract to T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $2,206,112.28. Budget Impact There would be no impact to the approved budget based on the above recommendation. The bid falls within the approved project budget and estimated construction cost established in the feasibility study. jW Attachments: Resolution Location Map RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $2,206,112.28 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, City Project 02 -10, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. LAURIE Rp — cn LAU R IE Q RD. <t a � Sherwood ` W ..� - SAN D H U R ST c� Park z~ w C� j- bi z Z < L 0 ad tone B CO. Q P rk z RD. > g E � BUR =KE .. AVE. �--- Cn BURKE AVE. ELD R I DGE AVE. Cornmuniy -S John Glenn 64 Center ,, B.E L M 0 N. =LN. o o - (3 A TE = cft A Y :� -w.� y Hall S K I L LMAN 3- AVE. 3 HARRIS - cr C/) Q ROSEWOOD AV - -D Robinhood - v Park ROSENO D. R AN . - � RAIN z <c. AVE_ S. SEY COUNTY o Q �� NURSING HOME A • z Q GROUNDS bo Cn Ty `. �T AVE. ::�i F • 5 cn ) -50. V) Cn _ ALDRICH GOODRI Lu GOLF MM ER AV E. �' AVE. [A COURS w S U MME >-- Q _ o L' Q Wak efield L j A f �'ENA U = akek eld > < c j z Lu CD � -�--.� Pa Q > 150 o R I P L EY • wcWakefieldr) / .1 r� < < c� ; Lake z w _ PHI A AVE. �- ` ` ; k � f Q o m cn KINGST r /) W r ' Lu t -� - s` ? ^ � Q - �- cn PRICE N PR i' s P f _ DO' r J f; �, � 1 i i r � , '+ }' W CD z LARP ENTE AVE. 0 3� z 64-Q - Project location no scale . � Exhibit 1 . • . \SDSKPP,pJ�,02 —IO :D4,rG \FEAS LOOT r0N.D °,/G 07/19/ 2002 03 P M CDT ro -- c Are Improvement K e nna rd/Frost 02-10 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT 02 -10 KENNARD STREET /FROST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL I', Project : 02 -10 KENNARD/FROST AVE IMP 5/6/2003 ASSESSMENT HEARING ROLL Public Hearing Date May 12, 2003 Pub. in Mplwd. Review April 23 & 30, 2003 Mail Notices April 22, 2003 LINE No. PIN OWNER - 1 ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE RES ST Uni Sub -T F.F. Uni Sub -T RES STM Uni Sub -T W.SVC Uni Sub -T TOTAL 1 152922110026 BRYAN L LENZ 1 1665 HARRIS AVE E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 2 152922120020 JOSEPH KELLER 1655 HARRIS AVE E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4, 200.00 1 $4,200.00 $660.00 1 $660.00 $4,860.00 3 152922120021 KELLIE K JOHNSON 2044 PROSPERITY ROAD MAPLEWOOD,- MN 1 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 4 152922130001 KAY L LONG 1992 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 5 152922130002 ULUMMA C ONYENEHO 1980 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55117 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 6 152922130003 ROBERT V BUENO 1976 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $41200.00 7 152922130004 TERRY S MILLER 1970 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 8 152922130005 JAMES B WEIST ET AL 1958 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 9 152922130006 GARRY J PALFE 1950 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 . 10 152922130007 NORMAN J RYDER 1934 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 11 152922130008 JOHN J MONETTE 1177 SUMMIT AVE ST PAUL, MN 55115 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 12 152922130011 ADELLE J LUND 1653 FROST AVE E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 13 152922130012 KAREN J THOLE 1947 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.0 $4,200.00 14 152922130013 JAMES W KELLOGG 1961 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 15 152922130014 ANDREW F CASALE 2019 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200..00 16 152922130015 SCOTT C ZAGER 2009 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4.,200.00 17 152922130016 CHARLES B EWALDT 2001 MARYKNOL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 18 152922130017 SUSAN E MAHMOOD 1997 MARYKNOL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 19 152922130018 ALBERT MAHMOOD 1991 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 20 152922130019 LEE G ERICKSON 1979 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 21 152922130020 DOUGLAS P OSLUND 1971 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 22 152922130021 DOUGLAS B GARDNER 1963 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4 ,200.00 $4,200.00 23 1 5292213 0022 MARVIN E ERICKSON 1947 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200 , $4,200.00 24 152922130023 MARVIN E ERICKSON 1947 MARYKNOLL AV N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 25 152922130024 IRVING P NASBY 1615 FROST AVE E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 26 152922130039 CAROL L RUPPERT 2032 PROSPERITY RD N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 27 152922130059 JAMES RICHARD ST.MARTlls 1955 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 28 152922140003 LEON M PARENTEAU 1667 ROSEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 29 152922140004 JEFFREY L OLSON 1673 ROSEWOOD AVE N 1 1681 MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 1 55109 $4,200.00 - 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 30 1 152922140005 DAVID R SCHOENECKER ROSEWOOD AVE N IST PAUL, MN $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 Project : 02 -10 KENNARD/FROST AVE (MP 5/6/2003 - ASSESSMENT HEARING ROLL Public Hearing Date May 12, 2003 Pub. in Mplwd. Review April 23 & 30, 2003 _ Mail Notices April 22, 2003 LINE No. PIN OWNER -1 ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE RES ST Uni Sub -T F.F. Uni Sub -T RES ST M Uni Sub -T W.SVC 1 Uni Sub -T TOTAL 31 152922140006 LARRY RAY VIG 1687 ROSEWOOD AVE N 1 1699 MAPLEWOOD, MN .55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 32 152922140007 D L RYGWALSKI ET AL 1693 ROSEWOOD AVE N ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 • $4,200.00 $4,200.00 33 152922140008 KAREN L SAVAGE ROSEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 34 152922140009 EARL L YOUNG ET AL 1707 RO SEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 35 152922140010 DIXIE N HATCHER 1713 ROSEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 36 152922140011 DAVID A SCHREINER 1721 ROSEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 37 152922140012 LLOYD A MELLEN 1731 ROSEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 38 152922140015 MARCELLA M MOTTAZ 1732 ROSEWOOD AVE S MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 39 152922140016 BRIAN E GRAVES 1726 ROSEWOOD AVE S MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 40 152922140017 W AYNE A LUND 1720 ROSEWOOD AVE S ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 41 152922140018 GERALD H BELL ET AL 1712 S ROSEWOOD AVE ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 42 152922140019 GERALD H BELL ET AL 171 ROSEWOOD AVE S ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $1,285.00 1 $1,285.00 $5,485.00 43 152922140020 LEROY A GRENGS TRUSTEE 1698 ROSEWOOD AVE S MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 44 152922140021 VELMA M CHRISTENSEN 106 27TH AVE N ST CLOUD, MN 56303 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 45 152922140022 PATRICK H WALTERS 1686 ROSEWOOD AVE S ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 46 152922140023 CARL L KRATZKE ET AL 1680 ROSEWOOD AVE S ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 47 152922140024 EARL W CURRAN 1672 ROSEWOOD AVE S MAPLEWOOD, .MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 48 152922140025 ALAN W COTTRELL ET AL 1666 ROSEWOOD AVE S ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 49 152922140026 MICHAEL E BYRAN 1978 KENNARD STN MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 50 152922140027 BETTY J BAUMANN LE 1970 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 51 152922140028 GENE R JOHNSON 1964 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 52 152922140029 GORDON P ESCHBACH ETA 1958 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 53 152922140030 LISA A ASCHENBRENER 1948 KENNARD ST N M APLEWOOD, M 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 . $4,200.00 152922140031 JEROME H KOERING 1944 KENNARD ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4.,200.00 55 152922140032 I R J NOSBUSCH ET AL 1936 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00. 56 152922140033 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 57 152922140036 KATHLEEN J EGGERT 1716 ROSEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 58 152922140037 TONY L OSWALD 1700 ROSEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 59 152922140038 LAWRENCE F FASTNER 1696 ROSEWOOD AVE N M APLEWO OD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 60 152922140039 MICHAEL J KOCHMANN 1688 ROSEWOOD AVE N ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 61 152922140040 R A JECHOREK ET AL 1678 ROSEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 62 152922140041 CYNTHIA L BELL 1668 ROSEWOOD AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 63 152922140042 SHERRYL A SMITH 1667 ROSEWOOD AVE S MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 64 152922140043 WALDEMAR D BLOCH ET AL 1677 ROSEWOOD AVE S MAPLE WOOD, MN 551 09 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 65 152922140044 ALICE B MILLER 1685 ROSEWOOD AVE S MAPLEWOOD, MN 1 55109 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 66 152922140045 MATTHEW T WOEHRLE 1695 ROSEWOOD AVE S MAPLEWOOD, MN $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 Page 2 of 8 Project : 02 -10 KENNARO /FROST AVE IMP 5/6/2003 ASSESSMENT HEARING ROLL Public Hearing Date May 12, 2003 Pub. in Mplwd. Review April 23 & 30, 2003 Mail Notices April 22, 2003 LINE No. PIN OWNER - 1 ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE RES ST Uni Sub -T F.F. Uni Sub -T RES STM Uni Sub -T W.SVC Uni Sub -T TOTAL 67 152922140046 THOMAS V PUHL 1705 ROSEWOOD AVE S ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 68 152922140047 SIRO ABREGO JR 1715 ROSEWOOD AV S MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 69 152922140049 VICKIE J PATRAW 1989 WHITE BEAR AVE MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $2,594.44 70 152922140050 PETER J DOEHNE 1959 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 71 152922140051 DOUGLAS C RICHARDSON 1955 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 72 152922140052 JEFFREY D SYME 1949 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,2 $494.44 1 $494:44 $4,694.44 73 152922140053 JOHN J PETROSKI 1947 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 74 152922140054 HAROLD G MORRISON 1941 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200:00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 75 152922140055 ALEXANDRA THOMPSON 1939 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 76 152922140056 JOHN KLINGNER 1937 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 77 152922140057 GARY L VANDEWALKER 1935 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 78 152922140058 FRANK D AUGE 1933 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 79 152922140059 LUIS C MORALES 1 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $494.44 0.50 $247.22 $2,347.22 80 152922140060 MICHAEL J BERINGER 1975 WHITE BEAR AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 81 152922140061 BARBARA E LUCAS 1950 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 82 152922140062 GARY J CIAMPI 1944 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 83 152922140063 DAVID P KOEL 1940 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 84 152922140064 KEITH G LASCOTTE 1938 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4, 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 1 $4,694.44 85 152922140065 BRIAN K JACKSON 1934 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $494.44 1 $494.44 $4,694.44 86 152922140066 GARY E NELSON I WANDA 1725 FROST AVE : E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $494.44 0.50 $247.22 $2,347.22 87 152922410016 J POORE 1810 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1, $4,200.00 $4 88 152922410017 MARY P GRECZYNA ET AL 1812 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 89 152922410018 TONYA M SILLMAN 1818 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 90 152922410019 DEAN R MUNDELL 1826 FLANDRAU STN MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 91 152922410020 MELODEE BUTLER 1832 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 92. 152922410021 BARBARA A SCHLINK 1834 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 93 152922410022 JOHN D EDMAN ET AL 1838 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 94 152922410023 STEVEN. JAMES EDMAN 1844 FRANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 95 152922410024 JEFFERY J MORGAN 1852 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 96 152922410025 JOHN P HINTZE 1856 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 97 152922410026 DEBRA M STARR 1860 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 98 152922410027 RICHARD T LASKA 1864 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 99 152922410028 DOLORES M KESSLER 1868 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 100 152922410029 THOMAS EUGENE KANSIER 1872 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 101 152922410030 LOIS WALSTEN 1878 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 102 152922410031 BRETT J THURY 1884 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 103 152922410032 DARLENE .M KONDZIELLA 1888 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 104 152922410033 JOHN G OBRIEN 1894.FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 105 152922410034 JEFFREY J JUNESKI 1898 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 106 152922410035 IGERALD R SYRING 1904 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 107 152922410036 JDAVID E FRANTSI 1908 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 Page 3of8 Project : 02 -10 KENNARDIFROST AVE IMP 5/6/2003 ASSESSMENT HEARING ROLL Public Hearing Date May 12, 2003 Pub.-in Mplwd. Review April 23 & 30, 2003 Mail Notices April 22, 2003 LINE No. PIN OWNER -1 ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE RES ST Uni Sub -T F.F. Uni Sub -T RES STM Uni Sub -T W.SVC Uni Sub -T' TOTAL 108 152922410037 DAVID D OLENDER 1912 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 109 152922410038 DAVID L LOMBARDI 1918 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 110 152922410039 LAWRENCE W BOTHWELL 1922 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 551 09 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 111 152922410040 JASON A RODEN 1926 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 112 152922410044 ROBERT G BRYNILDSON 1913 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 113 152922410045 DEVIN C FOLEY 1909 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 114 152922410046 JAMES A SPENCER 1903 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 115 152922410047 RICHARD L JOHNSTON 1899 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 116 152922410048 KELLY J GRAHAM 1895 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 117 152922410049 KEITH C TURCHIN 1889 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 118 152922410050 TERENCE R PEDERSON 1875 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 119 152922410051 DONALD BURTT PURRINGT 1873 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 120 152922410052 DALE W SCHAK 1871 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 121 152922410053 RICHARD A BURGESS 1865 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 122 152922410054 ALAN J NELSON 1859 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 123 152922410055 THOMAS M DORNBUSH 1855 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 124 152922410056 ROBERT T MERRY ET AL 1849 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 125 152922410057 RICHARD STARK 1843 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 126 152922410058 DENNIS L PAULSON 1839 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200. 127 152922410059 WILLIAM P WELDON 1835 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4 128 152922410060 JOAN H SPIESS LE 1831 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 129 152922410061 JOSEPH N SCHMITT 1827 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 130 152922410062 BRIAN LUGER 1819 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 131 152922410063 BEVERLY A GUNDRY 1815 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 132 152922410064 DONALD R GEBHARD ET AL 1807 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 133 152922410065 P J MCCAULEY ET AL 1808 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 134 152922410066 GENEVIEVE L MACLEOD 1812 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 135 152922410067 EUGENE A SHURSEN 1816 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 . $4,200.00 $4,200.00 136 152922410068 KENNETH H GAMER 1836 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 137 152922410069 JANIS L MESSICK 1842 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 138 152922410070 JOHN C POESCHL 1844 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 139 152922410071 PAULA NELSON 1868 KENNARD ST N ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 140 152922410072 KIMBERLY K BUHL 1878 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 141 152922410073 VIOLET P GREGORY 1884 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 142 152922410074 JOHN D GROGAN 1888 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 143 152922410075 CHRISTOPHER YANKUS 1892 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 144 152922410076 JEAN R STRAIT 1896 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 145 152922410077 NICHOLAS J PRACHAR JR 1918 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 146 152922410079 EVELYN E ALLEN 1928 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 147 152922410081 LINDA F INDAHL 1927 FLANDRAU ST N ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 148 152922410082 RICHARD 0 MILLER 1923 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 Project : 02 -10 KENINARDIFROST AVE IMP 5/6/2003 ASSESSMENT HEARING ROLL Public Hearing Date May 12, 2003 Pub. in Mplwd. Review April 23 & 30, 2003 Mail Notices April 22, 2003 LINE No. PIN OWNER - 1 ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE RES ST Uni Sub -T R.U. F.F. Uni Sub -T RES STM Uni Sub -T W.SVC Uni Sub -T TOTAL 149 152922410084 TIMOTHY P HIMMER 1919 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 150 152922420001 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B E _ MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 151 152922420003 RICHARD W KORTEKAAS 1912 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 152 152922420004 JAMIE L BETANCOURT 1904 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 153 152922420005 DENNIS W SCHNEIDER 1894 MARYKNOLL AVE N J MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 154 152922420006 EDWARD J KIVEL ET AL 1880 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 155 152922420007 THOMAS J WALZ 1870 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 156 152922420010 STASIA LEVINE 1855 SUMMER AVE E ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 157 152922420011 ANTHONY T WALSH 1861 SUMMER AVE E MAPLEWOOD, MN 551 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 158 152922420012 CHARLES R KNAPP 1879 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,20 $4,200.00 159 152922420013 RICHARD D MCCARTAN TRL 1885 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 _ $4,200.00 160 152922420014 JOHN RAYMOND DAUGS 1893 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 161. 152922420015 P MARY BURNVILLE GIBSO 1849 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 162 152922420016 BARBARA J MELIN 1844 SUMMER AVE E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 163 152922420017 JOANNE C MORIS 1834 SUMMER AVE E MA PLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200:00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 164 165 166 152922420018 152922420019 152922420020 PHILIP W -SWANSON KENNETH L HOUSE MICHAEL S JOHNSON 1830 SUMMER AVE E 1818 MARYKNOLL AVE N 1810 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN MAPLEWOOD, MN MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 55109 55109 $4,200:00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 1 1 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 167 152922420021 ROBERT M VIDLUND 1811 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 168 169 170 152922420022 152922420023 152922420024 RUTH L ELLWANGER PATRICK F HENRY ET AL STEVEN P NESS 1819 KENNARD ST N 1827 KENNARD ST N 1841 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN MAPLEWOOD, MN MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 55109 55109 $4,200:00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 1 1 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 171 152922420036 MARIE PRZYNSKI 1848 PROSPERITY ROAD MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,1 00.00 $2,100.00 172 152922420042 CONSTANCE L ELERT TRUS 1801 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 173 152922420043 TRACY L MILLER 1813 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 174 152922420044 BETH A WOLSZON 1823 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 175 152922420045 VIVIAN E FORSBERG 1831 MARYKNOLL AVE MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 176 152922420046 KEITH R JOHNSON 1839 MARY AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 177 152922420047 CECILIA R JENSEN 1851 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 Page 5 of 8 Project : 02 -10 KENNARD /FROST AVE IMP 5/612003 ASSESSMENT HEARING ROLL Public Hearing Date May 12, 2003 Pub. in Mplwd. Review April 23 & 30, 2003 Mail Notices April 22, 2003 LINE No. PIN OWNER - 1 ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE RES ST Uni Sub -T F. F. Uni Sub -T RES STM Uni Sub -T W.SVC Uni Sub -T TOTAL 178 152922420048 STEVE A FERNAN1DEZ 1866 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 179 152922420049 RALPH J RUEDY 1850 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 180 152922430001 TERRY L FINNEGAN 1798 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN_ 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 181 152922430002 PAUL D BIRKEY 1786 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 182 152922430003 JON F DUFFY 1776 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 183 152922430004 TED J PODGORSKI ET AL 1764 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 184 152922430005 KATHLEEN M SMYKALSKI 1765 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 185 152922430006 KENNETH D PEKAREK I CARLIRANUM 1773 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 186 152922430007 1789 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 187 152922430008 THEODORE A HAAS 1801 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 188 152922430009 RICHARD J WOLSZON ETAL 1793 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 189 152922430010 VERNON S MAGNUSON 1779 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 190 152922430011 HERIETTA J CHATTERTON 1771 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 191 152922430012 RICHARD A NELSON ET AL 1767 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 192 152922430013 LEONARD A JABLONSKI 1763 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 193 152922430014 DIANE D STANSELL 1759 MARYKNOLL AVE MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 194 152922430015 PETER A KOEGEL 1745 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 195 152922430016 CHURCH OF THE PRESENTATION 1725 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 196 152922440021 DAVID M GUSTAFSON 1725 LARPENTEUR AVE E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 197 152922440022 ALLISON A YOUNG 1702 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 198 152922440023 MICHAEL P CARRIGAN 1704 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 199 152922440024 KENNETH W KOOIMAN 1706 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 200 152922440025 JUAN C FERNANDEZ 1710 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 201 152922440026 MICHELLE I MILLER 1714 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,2 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 202 152922440027 DONNA M RUSCHER 1718 FLANDRAU ST N- MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00, $4,200.00 203 152922440028 RUSSELL N MCCUSKEY 1724 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 204 152922440029 WARREN D JOHNSON 1726 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 205 152922440030 THOMAS GLEN ABRAHAMS 1734 FLANDRAU ST N M APLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 206 152922440031 MANUEL M. ALVARADO 1744 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 207 152922440032 LINDA S THOMPSON 1748 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 208 152922440033 A C FREIERMUTH ET AL 1752 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 209 152922440034 CHAD WEGSCH.EIDER 1756 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 210 152922440035 AMY M LOVGREN 1762 FLANDRAU ST M APLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 211 152922440036 MICHAEL LOMOTEY 1768 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 212 152922440037 LUIS A ROMERO HERNANDE 1772 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 213 152922440038 CHRISTOPHER T CRAYNE 1780 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.0 $4,200.00 214 152922440039 GERALD W BARTON 1784 FLANDRAU ST N ST PAUL, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 215 152922440040 DALE F MASSOP 1790 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 1 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 216 152922440041 NORMAN D NELSON 1794 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 217 152922440042 NORMAN D RHODES 1800 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200. $4,200.00 218 152922440043 GARY R HORN 1804 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 219 152922440044 ICLAYTON R BLEKEBERG 1803 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 Project : 02 -10 KENNARD/FROST AVE [MP 5/6/2003 ASSESSMENT HEARING ROLL Public Hearing Date May 12, 2003 Pub. in Mplwd. Review April 23 & 30, 2003 Mail Notices April 22, 2003 LINE No. PIN OWNER -1 ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE RES ST Uni Sub -T R.O.- F.F.. Uni Sub -T RES STM Uni Sub -T W.SVC Uni Sub - T TOTAL 220 152922440045 MICHAEL C BLOSSOM 1797 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 221 152922440046 KATHERINE E HILL 1793 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 1 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 222 152922440047 BERNICE C PEDEN 1791 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 223 152922440048 JEFFREY S RICHARDSON 1785 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 224 152922440049 CHRISTYNE A EICKSTADT 1779 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 225 152922440050 WILLIAM R MOEN 1773 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 226 152922440051 MICHAEL GORDON RYGWAI 1769 FLANDRAU STN MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 227 152922440052 LORIE L SETHER 1765 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109. $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 228 152922440053 MARTIN J VAN HOUTEN 1759 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 229 152922440054 LINDA M GOLDBEN 1753 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 '230 152922440055 PETER L SOLA 1749 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 231 152922440056 BRADLEY RAYMOND 1733 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 232 152922440057 JAMES L ROBBINS 1729 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 233 152922440058 RICHARD A POPPKE 1725 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 234 152922440059 FRANK R NELSON 1719 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 235 152922440060 JASON R RUDOLPH 1715 FLANDRAU ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 236 152922440061 WILLIAM E BASTYR 1707 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 237 152922440062 MICHAEL A ROESER 1703 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 238 152922440063 MICHAEL B SIEDOW 1699 FLANDRAU ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 239 152922440064 LINDA J MCDONOUGH REE 1715 LARPENTEUR AVE E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $4,200.00 240 152922440070 CHIANG LA THAO 1667 E LARPENTEUR AVE MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 241 152922440071 EDWIN F WINTERLE ET AL 1698 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $2,100.00 242 152922440072 TOM W MITCHELL ET AL 1708 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 243 = - 152922440073 DONALD B �GOODWIN ET AL 1722 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 244 152922440074 DOUGLAS A CUNNIEN 1730 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $41200.00 $4,200.00 245 152922440075 ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL 1740 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 246 152922440076 JOSEPH A THELL 1746 KENNARD ST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 247 152922440077 MARY ANN THELL 1750 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 248 152922440078 MARIANNE G ROSSEL 1756 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 r 249 152922440079 RICHARD A GOGGIN 1766 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 250 152922440080 C O TRIPLETT JR ET AL 1772 KENNARD ST N. MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 -$4,200.00 251 152922440081 KIM M SHAWBOLD 1784 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 1 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 252 152922440082 GEORGE T STEPHENSON 1788 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200:00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 253 152922440083 ROBERT C GREEN 1609 E CO RD B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 254 152922440084 ANTHONY J CROTTY 1802 KENNARD ST N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 255 152922110025 DUANE A HOLMBERG 1915 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 $2,100.00 .5 $2,100.00 256 152922420031 RONALD J PERRON 1872 PROSPERITY RD N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 .5 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 257 15292242003 2 DEBRA R PRICE 1871 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 258 152922420033 JOSEPLH G DUBORD 1885 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 1 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 259 152922420034 HAROLD A PRUST 1891 MARYKNOLL AVE N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $4,200.00 1 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 Page 7of8 Project : 02 -10 KENNARDIFROST AVE IMP 5/6/2003 ASSESSMENT HEARING ROLL Public Hearing Date May 12, 2003 Pub. in Mplwd. Review April 23 & 30, 2003 Mail Notices April 22, 2003 LIN No. PIN OWNER - 1 ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE RES ST Uni SubJ R.O.W-f- F.F.. Uni Sub -T RES STM Uni. Sub -T W.SVC Uni Su -T T OTAL 260 - 152922420035 BRADFORD WILLIAMS 1 99 MA AVE N 8. RYKNOLL MA LEWOOD MN P 55109 $4,20 00 1 $4 $4,200.00 $1 $8,405.48 $660:00 $1,285.00 $1,056,150.48 $1,056,150.48 Page 8 of 8 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council. TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager Date FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Endorsed Chuck Vermeersch, Civil Engineer I Modified Dejected SUBJECT: Maplewood Drive /Keller Parkway Resurfacing, Project 03 -02 7M Resolution Receiving Bids and Awarding Construction Contract DATE: May 5, 2002 Introduction Final plans and specifications for Maplewood Drive /Keller Parkway were approved by the city council on March 31, 2003, and authorization was given to advertise for bids. Those bids were received and opened on Friday, May 2, 2003. Background The bids were received and publicly read aloud at 10:30 a.m., Friday, May 2, 2003. The following seven bids were received: 1. T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. $102,364.64 2. Midwest Asphalt Corporation $105,027.60 3. Hardrives $109,213.60 4. Tower Asphalt $109,631.40 5. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $115,268.00 6. Ace Blacktop, Inc. $117,794.00 7. North Valley, Inc. $119,771.00 All bids have been checked and tabulated. The engineer's estimate for this project was $146,113.80. The low bid from T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. of $102,364.64 is 30% less than the engineer's estimate. Discussion The Maplewood Drive /Keller Parkway Resurfacing project consists of a combination of cold -in- place recycle and overlay with a limited amount of storm sewer and grading work. The bids described above are for the paving portion of the project only. City and county forces will perform the remaining work items. T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. is the low bidder on the paving portion of this project. They were low bidder on the Kennard /Frost project as well. Their bid was $2,662.96 below the next bidder. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution accepting the bids and awarding a construction contract to T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $102,364.64. CJV jw Attachment: Resolution Location Map RESOLUTION RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on March 31, 2003, plans and specifications for the Maplewood Drive /Keller Parkway Resurfacing, City Project 03 -02, have been approved, and WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on March 31, 2003, bids were received and publicly opened and read aloud on May 2, 2003 as follows: 1. T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. $102,364.64 2. Midwest Asphalt Corporation $105,027.60 3. Hardrives - $109,213.60 4. Tower As phalt $109,631.40 5. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $115,268.00 6. Ace Blacktop, Inc. $117,794.00 7. North Valley, Inc. $119,771.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE-CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Said bids as opened on May 2, 2003, are hereby received and acknowledged. 2. . A construction contract in the amount of $102,364.64 is hereby awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc., and the mayor and city manager are hereby authorized to execute said construction contract. 3. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan. Project Location F Maplewood .Drive C.P. 03 -02 1. `» � ... § � A ��\ �»- 2� » ` PUBLIC IMP ROVE ME NT 03 MAPL EWOOD DRIVE W PARKWAY STRE I FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL f � � a � P r 703-02 o ec t. ant r' to oo D Iv Wes Maplewood e t PROPOSED ASSESSMENT SED COMMERCIAL EN T ROLL CO M RCIA S ASSES SM THE RING Date: 05 12/0 / 3 _ .... ::.:.. „:. ' P ub. m d Review: . e ew. April 3 A 2 30t 003 h2 , :.......:: ......:.. .......: ` Mail Noti 1 04122/03 3 PIN OWNER BIT REPL (Comm.) Uni Sub -T BIT REPL (Res.) Uni Sub -T MILUO%rLAY (Res.) Uni Sub-T STORM RES Uni Sub -T STORM COMM Uni Sub -T TOTAL 092922120002 RICHARD B SHAW & SHANNON K SHAW 1122 COUNTY ROAD C E $0.00 0 $0.00 $2,210.00 0.5 $1,105:00 $0.00 $0 $o $0 0.00 $0 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $1,105.00 092922120002 MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 092922120009 WILLIAM J KEEFER 2557 HIGHWAY $44.20 315 $13,923.00' $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 0 092922120009 61 ST PAUL, MN 55109 0.00 $0.00 $13,923.00 092922120010 WILLIAM J. KEEFER $44.20 194.3 $8,588.06 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 0 0.00 $0.00 $8,588.06 092922120010 2557 HIGHWAY 61ST PAUL MN 55109 092922120011 WILLIAM J KEEFER 2560 HIGHWAY $44.20 333.7 $14,749.54 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 0 092922120011 61 ST PAUL MN 55112 0.00 $0.00 $14,749.54 092922120012 WILLIAM J KEEFER 2557 HIGHWAY $44.20 82 $3,624.40 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $o $0 0.00 $0 0 092922120012 61 ST PAUL, MN 55109 0.00 $o.00 $3,s24.ao 092922130003 MUELLNER FAMILY LP 1777 $44.20 349 $15,425.80 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 $13.20 349.00 $4,606.80 $20,032.60 092922130003 STILLWATER ST WHITE BEAR TOWN, MN 55110 092922130004 RICHARD PELTIER ET AL 2497 $44.20 85 $3,757.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 $13.20 85.00 $1,122.00 $4,879.00 092922130004 MAPLEWOOD DR N ST PAUL, MN 55109 $44.20 175 $7,735.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 $13.20 175.00 $2,3 10.00 $10,045.00 092922130005 GLORIA E ZUERCHER 2686 5TH AVE 092922130005 E NORTH ST PAUL, MN 55109 092922130006 ACORN MINI STORAGE V LLCC /O $44.20 176 $7,779.20 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 $13.20 176.00 $2,323.20 $10,102.40 NATIONWIDE GROUP 1724 DOUGLAS DR N GOLDEN 092922130006 VALLEY, MN 55422 $44.20 237 $10,475.40 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 13.2 237.00 $3,128.40 $13,603.80 092922130008 STEPHEN W SHEA ODELL C SHEA 092922130008 2411 MAPLEWOOD DR N MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 092922130009 GREGORY P KUHNS JOANN KUHNS $44.20 185.75 $8,210.15 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 13.2 185.75 $2,451.90 $10,662.05 092922130009 217 DAWN AVE SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 092922130011 ACORN MINI STORAGE V LLCC /O NATIONWIDE GROUP 1724 DOUGLAS DR N $44.20 90 $3,978.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 13.2 90.00 $1,188.00 $5,166.00 092922130011 GOLD VALLEY, MN 55422 092922130013 KAILASH HOSPITALITY INC 2441 092922130013 MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $44.20 172.51 $7,624.94 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 13.2 172.51 $2,277.13 $9,902.07 092922230028 JAMES FAULCONBRIDGE THERESE $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $1,580.00 1 $1,580 $660 1 $660 $0.00 0 $0.00 $2,240.00 FAULCONBRIDGE 2400 KELLER PARKWAY 092922230028 MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 ' Pro ect .,Q� 03 W t M aple wo od D irY e est ; ... P ROPOS D ROLL ; - ASSE SSMENT -COMMERC .... . ..... . ...: ......: ... ... .:::... ..... ..... ..... ...... .:;.. .... ...�: .....: - :........ .. ' . ARIN D • ASSESSMENT HEARING ate ;. /12/0 05 3 ....: :.... .. _.:. .....:..:: .. ....:: ..,. ....': . :: ...::. ' .. : :' P ub. M w Review: i ' April A 30 003 :.... 30th, 2 • Mai 1 i Not ces. 2/ 04/2 03 .. ... .:: Omm Im .. .. PIN OWN ER _... . BIT REPL (Comm.) Uni Sub-T BIT REPL (Res.) Uni Sub -T MILUOV'LAY (Res.) Uni Sub -T STORM RES Um Sub-T STORM COMM Uni Sub -T TOTAL 092922310001 THOMAS M GIEBEL MARIE HAMILTON $44.20 350 $15,470.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $13.20 350.00 $4,620.00 $20,090.00 GIEBEL 1544 RIVERCREST RD N LAKELAND, MN 092922310001 55043 $44.20 141 $6,232.20 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $13.20 141.00 $1,861.20 $8,093.40 092922310002 JACK R AMBLER 2528 MANITOU 092922 ISLAND WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 092922310008 THOMAS R HERMANSON 1055 $44.20 248.52 $10,984.58 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 13.2 248.52 $3,280.46 $14,265.05 092922310008 HIGHWAY 36 E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 $44.20 303 $13,392.60 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 $13.20 303.00 $3,999.60 $17,392.20 092922420008 YVONNE SWENSON 3220 GRANAD 092922420008 i AVE N STE 150 OAKDALE, MN 55128 $151,949.88 $1,105.00 $1,580.00 $660.00 $33,168.701 $188,463.57 $188,463.57 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Action by Council. I Richard Fursman, City Manager r °� Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer Re Hazelwood Street Improvements (County Road C to Beam), Project 01 -16— Reconsideration of Authorization to Proceed with Project Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications (4 votes required to adopt resolution) DATE: May 6, 2003 Introduction/Summary On Monday evening, April 14, the city council held the public hearing to consider the Phase I improvements to Hazelwood Street between County Road C and Beam Avenue. The council vote on the project was . 3 in favor and 2 opposed. The project was not approved due to the requirement to have a super majority (4/5) approval to order construction projects to implementation. On April 28, the city council voted to reconsider that vote. The information that follows are additional project issues related to council discussion. Back-ground Overlay An overlay of the roadway was suggested as a possible alternative to the reconstruction proposed. Our engineering team has estimated the cost of performing n overlay of this g Y segment of roadway. We have reviewed the soil borings and note that the worst soils are between County Road C and the church area, which is the location of a majority of the single- family homes. We would recommend a 2 -inch overlay be placed in the first 1900 feet of the project, or basically in the area of the single - family homes; however only if certain segments of the worst pavement receive some base repairs. The northerly segment is commercial property and would be included with Phase 2 improvements. Our review indicates that this approach would give a reasonable pavement. surface for approximately 5 -8. years. The estimated cost of the overlay improvement would be $100,000. Further, we have determined that Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) funds could not be used for the overlay because the street does not meet pavement design standards. The Public Works Department does not an budget funds for g Y overlays, thus our only financing approach would be assessments to the 23 homeowners. Based on this assumption we find the following: $100,000 divided into 23 single - family homes = $4,350 per property. Note: Proposed street assessment (full reconstruction) _ $4,200 per property Proposed storm assessment = 660 per property TOTAL ASSESSMENT = $4,860 per property Obviously an overlay approach would be more expensive for the property owner than a full reconstruction and is not recommended. City Council Agenda Report Hazelwood Street Improvements May 6, 2003 Page Two Alternative Financing Options The property owner testimony indicated that 7 of the 23 single - family homeowners testified that they were in favor of the road improvement but had problems with the assessments. It is probably not in the city's best interests to not assess these properties; however, the council could consider deferring the assessment for up to five years under the following options: Option #1: Defer until 2008 with property owner paying interest. Under this scenario, the property owner would not pay his first payment until ro ert taxes in p p Y 2008. Interest on the deferment would accrue during the deferment years at 6 %. This option would be no extra cost to the city. The individual assessment amount would be as follows: Current proposed assessment amount = $4,860.00 St . year installment = $324 (principal) + $291.60 (interest) _ $615.60 With interest bearing deferment: Original principal = $4,860.00 Interest (2003 — 2007) $1,419.85 Total at end of deferment = $6,279.85 1 St year installment = $795.45 (payable over 15 years) Cost of Option #1 to property owner = $180 per month for 15 years Option #2: Defer until 2008 without interest on deferment. Under this scenario, the property owner's assessment would not become due until January 1, 2008. The City would pay interest on the bonds. The individual assessment amount would be the same as under the proposed plan, but would be five years later becoming due: Proposed assessment amount = $4,860.00 (begins in January 2008) 1 St year (2008) installment = $615.60 Cost to the City for interest on 23 assessments of $4,860 = $21,520 Note: This cost is likely to be eligible for reimbursement from MSAS funds as an indirect project expense. While this approach may establish a precedent for future projects, it is estimated that it impacts less than 3 -5 % of streets within Maplewood and a policy statement of the council could limit this approach on future improvement projects. Future Improvement Considerations Issues have been raised about a need to delay this improvement to avoid construction traffic. That is typically opposite the normal approach. Our engineering staff will generally restrict construction traffic from area improvements from a newly constructed street. Should this project be approved, all construction traffic from the County Road D Improvements and Legacy Village Improvements would be restricted from this route. Conversely, without the improvement, there is not a pavement preservation reason to restrict construction traffic. City Council Agenda Report Hazelwood Street Improvements May 6, 2003 Page Three Budget Impact The attached resolution calls for establishing a project budget of $1,282,000. The financing Ian is outlined specifically in the feasibility study and calls for funding from a number of sources: assessments, Municipal State Aid, Sewer Utility fund, St. Paul Regional Water Services obligation, and private residential upgrades (private" driveway agreements). Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution Ordering the Improvement of Hazelwood Street, (County Road C to Beam Ave.), Project 01 -16, and that the City Council select Financing Option #2, deferring assessments without interest until January 1, 2008, and direct the City Engineer to prepare a policy for establishment of deferments for single family homes on Municipal State Aid Funded streets. RCA jw Attachments: Resolution Site Plan Letter of 4 -29 -03 to Hazelwood Residents Letters from Residents Regarding Hazelwood Street RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 31 st day of March, 2003 fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements to Hazelwood Street (County Road C to Beam Ave.), Project 01 -16, and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on April 14, 2003, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same, and WHEREAS, the city council did not vote to approve the project on April 14, 2003, and WHEREAS, pursuant to city council rules, a motion to reconsider the J ro'ect vote p was duly made on April 28, 2003, placing the reconsideration of the vote on the May 12, 2003 City Council Meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements to Hazelwood Street (County Road C to Beam Ave.), Project 01 -16. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 12th day of May 2003. 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the ro'ect. A project budget of p J p J g $1,282,000 shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as follows: State Aid $ 916,680 Assessments $ 246,590 Sanitary Sewer Fund $ 5 SPRWS Obligation $ 8 Private Agreements $ 104 Total $1.,282,000 ✓i j s is i f 1 { : : ice« - •«t • l f [ f . 3062 - 3056 1480 1700 Sit •fi _� • { i i 3050 ! ; 4p 1 3 ) - .. _•��^ i:.ry,� Jf. i is i G? i- .....+«,.- „_ ,•,• ' .1001! • a.'.'`, - 3004 •.! x980 } i : i ` .a� '�: i 3 ' • � 1575 i s', aT4-.'a 160o I ���J j � i s :• i 1 i .. i j I: E '�: 1930 t 4 I � i r•t � '. l: • i £ 1535 ° j ; j 1675 i { . _ . ................. s .i_ _. _ _ ^• •.....r i ' .... _ ._ ... ......._._..........._......... r.:..... '• ~•�- -.. . ._............._......_....... _...._ ..........................._.......... ............_..........._..._.. .._.... «. _ _d. _._.. K ._.............._...... _.... ._.. .........._........ .... _ ..................__ .ac.. ... 1S4h. ASif•- __.._..__.... -" - -'- - _= _ -= :.: ..... "' - -.- . ........ . .............. . .....__. ........... ._.__:: :.............._...._... .............--._..._..-_.._..........'.. .._...................._..._... - ... --.-"'. _ ........._...._.._._......_ ............................. - -' - - 3:. ....^ ........... j ••...,� ... c - e:i's �zr::i3i : °r.�:`til ?ii�6::::.:ii:s. .j: ..................... {:Y -x: i`:'� _rrs3zFi ?:�::c:t.r...•):'. ?:^•ii:•E: I cv ..... ......... :{3.'i;:_•`5: _g. -_ iiuli ?3 j �A ^�' M, �d'�Pf'•, N� "' _�- - '= >>• :•_I>:wi?:cj:'> 1 - >i::i)'>) 1 i 1W V �.,' . «' .. +•�: -n'v. ' })J'.::::� -:':: i )'. ?:: :I { i t w - ; : r . : .r ^ ' . i y ia'y .>;;;c. • S 1670 , `„"`- •�._ _... -- -- .- i:;..: i'.: 7 _ s 't*'S"^i.`,t::: >:); :... --, ..- .+^°�^`.�: .•..••w,cvo....!t ' .2., i S ? ?:�_:'` c3 >33>3)'.i3 3'i3iC_ ::_ 1770 - v"?ii..ii ?i ?{r•:. 3::3> }>.ti. =_:z' ., ,r { c SS •_3s _ ff ia 14[0 3i {�3`is rtb ? ?3:i3i{ . I it } •�• ��iP itiiS ?3; ?i' >• >•.= ':: i,33 t1: -. -:�• _ FF'_ = >� >):Yi) ?::) J •k'z iii3i ii ? ?: -iii: t ?j -: 1 �_' _ ter._. �ri_3 =t s� ...�•.?,... _ {4 "� I b iis:• » ».. j i: ?:e _L.:• _ : -Ki). : L1i.9i''•i. *' : d3s:: i .s - t ,3 » i - .rri�i {'E Iiii ? { »:�.i ?ii:.. - .I s. { •s ....:.... i• { {: ?: ?i .i;= �x - _ - . . ^iiii s >:i {ya ••'.rs s » ,.). e> i` ` •; >T <•j" � ���..^ % _ _ - - ;iiG ,..i)3_'. "r' eI i t t j j : % ': t95 •u� a a �� i i 2745 i I Ag Y Q • : 73 V. - .7Y 1 2781 i 2117' i iii { •:.� 2775 i 2746 j 1 i i i I : u {� " .. • 'h«' s is s 2744 { 1 !? '' { ' 2737 �{ :690 - 1 2745 I t y._._.._ •- .._...._._._«._........_. -•-- '� • � ' i • � 374 t i i i i E 2731 2730 1 L381 { 1189} 1391:110] 1403 i 1423 1 1429 "�•- - 7] U67 U7] f : i { { y } { 1 ) 2697 2N4 �2 i ! \ 3 2707'- 2690 t71 i is i 1417 �' t tt { 2691 \ s 26M ...... . .... . . . .. ......... . c lt; ac ... _ ::::::::::. 2[99 U84 !1390 2693 { • { 1410 141E 1414 2679 [ "�•` £ 'f �.vS,;Y. 2;69 2673 i '^�.r -�• I i Ih '? - U6ti 1376 i 2681 i 2670 i 2681 f M82 l ✓ 268 2[93 2K7 - i I . i ---- ' ° : 3 : 1677 2[78 2675 �'....,, . 2 K4 i I 9 i 1 �' r I 2674 2676 +•' --� 1496 1504 f 1 i 2672 t j 2L Y t 2q< ' 1•-i ` •..._�_t = 2K! i 2670 i i { 2669 i• = 2"3 2644 K 2662 KW = _ - - 26K S _ e i r^ -- a• i i 2664 �. •_.,.� 2661 2[60 pi 1379 UE3 264! j = i - i 2161 X65a .1 ` 1391 F 1403 1411 2N7 Y - i 1519 f 2M6 2640 2654 19 89 266] ? ` 1695 315E9 IKT 1675 1691 z 1p7 264 - .. _....... «....__..- ........... «- \ .................. ^_.. .___._... .�.�Jta�i YtfWDCE _ _ ....._.. _..__._...__..._..... ..... _ .. .........._...._._...... ........_..._....__............ ....._......_.... . ............ ..................... . .._ _ Y ........................_._.___....._.........^.... ......._................__._ -•_ - ..... ^- ....._ .�� . -- _ _ _ "•"`' .� _'. �• i -••. ?. -.7 :55: 1374 23K Af[ 1606 { IAL a 161Y4 _ : { 17]0 . { 1600 1612 WPM: i S632 1 1632 1662 3674 16K t :, 1700 170E � . ,:. _ . ..: .. .. .:..: ? � �. --�ss� mow•- cx�, :xen•cw. .' mra . y • - • • '' N.. YY 4:- "T3 : A� \C Ct+vF.t.'i: <p2Y>'¢r ") " . Y'.Y . � .•:. -�.- -:: - - : ��'��>`h.. �`w��{�•i..�iJY.`l1� b..3,swa���`•T�_•Y•��'.• , S,y^`��SR z = :>2� bow. �"'y..c�cr«trco _ f r�i"e�- uas'i�rr�t��nbll�c s tom• SY9a'"`G �4iP� ;P*?• t � : 'si4ev:i's"orprai at�aeaSdeeniarasaei :Soe.r`s1ii�iar ",.,�.�., M: �c�., •?4 ' > M _ -_ � �ngs+t iiAi�s3s.�:y.0'"siEw.,�issca► mind ••F.Maiws�wia- wls�.�i�.ffa(. •.,y , Cf�S$6.1Q����„ •�`t- ">��'.�� ` �.,J �J�" a��'' c�M��sw itr �aatlr4 >baflwr�ki+Mirfw'sSrMs(P6�Oale� �•< ` `cn :. Pt!���� „� ;^:�:• aiaY7SCa - .r x bin ►r►•9Yni�•raseia'is�pri:b�)[ew nr416M„! k c - ,�,= „ t•• �� - � • - , `, , 9: - _ .. t wdfxir+I Niw•s et�lf�- ns S�wsar s�►, w► igw��eVi9 •as�wew>.w1aT�"�'�` ��F $ JOOCSI � � '� .�' - - ) xfaKaM60t�FfQOWIr: 1RiNgoeal�MEi� �i "-p� ����,y - ��xts :. - i. �� "rT - . • •� ,dwat 9�ramklSk�4610P1 71i�}fiwOelC�SJ< � .S b.�.si� •`�•t•>ti,.�Ry � ,� F : :" i iprriEYii�wacTWL7i6i. 00 :9o►C.Z7`�7000�•r4•laia.ar.+[F� w sy,�' £� � � )O � { '�` -c +-{ � . T T ogeth 7 er W✓(' yet / �'!alFiGti wtisatM: lf• M�la6+ ilYl�wl+ ls• s wi�w' �+ ys�lnrisMf�►• aed q�' � ' " „�'w:% `I�'SSiOR �'�rZ. c� xs., Can .. - ... ,.., :: _ _ . - �,�” � �' ;''_' s- t". s�..�'�- � �.z�""''�*"�'���'`" �'`�....�����.,� • � :t '.- ,'�'' '�h�c� . www.cr.Maplewood.mn.rrs_:.: _.. - Together, We Can - - April 29,, 2003 Dear Hazelwood Resid.e P ROPOSED RECONSIDERATION OF HAZEL WOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT, .PROJECT - For. those �of you-who have followed the.1-city.council meefin s you ''ho. know that the. r - g Y p oposal to reconstruct Hazelwood Street: was• not passed. at the Ap.r..i1 council eetin . `j r g - However, 0 28,-••2003, council • meeting; the. city council v''ted. reconsider their: - r - decision on the�Hazel • = ' wood project. The. recto- nsideration of the Hazelwood ro ect will be . p•J placed 0n •tte May.12,2003�, city counctt - a g enda under_ 01d t3usiness. - :You are encouraged. to attend• the May 1 - 2, 20 city council - me.etin ':Note, however that. this V . item wili� not be�a•pu�blic hearing there is no �uaranteethatit will be.fo ened to ' g ublic _ cussiori. Pub. : c test�rrmony.was.received at the .A rii '14 ci council meetin If the ro'e p tY g.' p J ct is ; approved: on May 12;.the project would likely proceed as a.ri `inall Ira.nn_ed t = Pl the Mao iewood En ineerin y - - p g g Department at 65'i 770 4:550 with any q- uesti�ons or comrnents. r. ' r AC C.HRISTOPHERU. CAVETT, P.E. -, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER _ C: .'huck Ahl Public Works DirectorlCity Engineer _ ' Richard F. urs'rmn, 'City = Manager..., Larry Bohrer, Inc. D EPARTM ENT OF PUBLIC- WO RKS- 631- 7 70 -4550 FAX: 651- 748 3089 C ITY O F MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST C OUNTY RO AD B •. MA�'LEWOOD MN 3 109 SS '�=: Bert Darst F k` ` =j From: Dale Maroushek [dale@lost-boys.co rn] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 10:50 PM To: s Kathy. Juenemann @ci.maplewood.mn.us; Kenneth. Collins @ci. Maplewood. mn. us; Marvin. Koppen @ci. Maplewood. mn. us Subject: Hazelwood St. You "spoke up for a good cause. I have asked Julie and Bob why they voted no. We need another thru street over 36, and to the new developement ,which is the end result of this rebuilding, and I support it. Yes, it's my street, I paid my $4.3G, as did all the others from C to Gervais, when we did this 4 years ago. Four G's over 10 or 15 years is nothing, most owners have that increase in home value 10 times over.We enjoy the improvement and the sidewalks are used daily by multiply people and kids. The citizens against this project are lost in their own space and not concerned about Maplewood. Yes, test drives go by here at higher than posted speed, as do fire volunteers answering a page. Police have had too many accidents on C and Hazelwood, a controlled intersection is needed, talk to the county. (ask them why parking is not allowed west of Hazelwood where the road has parking lanes, and is allowed east of Hazelwood on the 2 lane road? Beats me.) That section from Gervias to 36 is failing fast, lets get the bridge project going, Police and Fire need it. ! Dale Maroushek 2602 Hazelwood 1 Page 1 of 1 Bert Darst From: WestbergRick @aol..com Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 5:11 PM To: ken neth.collins @ci. maplewood. mn. us; kathy. juenemann @ci. maplewood. mn. us; marvin.koppen @ci.maplewood.mn.us; julie .wasiluk @ci.mapiewood.mn.us Subject: Hazelwood street repairs Hello, I was not able to make it to the council meeting regarding the proposed repairs to Hazelwood St. north of Co. Rd. C. So, I am sending you my comments. have lived in Maplewood for over 30 years; all but 1 year on Hazelwood, south of Co. Rd. C. Two years ago, 1 paid my assessment ($6,000) knowing that it would contribute to the betterment of the city and also knowing that I was moving to Brooks Av. the next year. Even though I no longer live on Hazelwood, my family travels this route quite often; my daughter works at St. John's Hospital. Our feeling is that we should have the same convenience using Hazelwood north of C as those now do using south of C. I would appreciate your reconsideration for the improvement of this portion of the street. The street's condition is unacceptable. Regards, Rick Westberg 4/3 0/2003 APR 1 7 2003 3042 Walter Street Maplewood, MN 55109 April 16, 2043 Mayor Cardinal City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 I have written to you several times in the past but have never received the courtesy of a response. I was disappointed by your actions a few years ago when you released the police account of the actions of the former District 622 superintendent. I thought it was "small" of you to do that; while his actions were questionable, he had never been charged with anything and I wondered where you got the power to destroy another individual. I also wrote to you when you and another council member created the "mess" with the emergency dispatching. The voters, through a referendum, chose to go with Ramsey County rather than spending local tax money for a dispatch center. Nevertheless, you went against the wishes of the majority of the voters, sold the bonds, and paid for the dispatch center out of local property taxes. I think of your arrogance and stupidity in this situation when I see members of the state legislature and state administration question why we have so many dispatch centers in the Twin Cities area. I thought though that maybe you would "grow" into your position. I thought that your recent ethical lapse of a year ago when you used city stationery to promote your real estate business was a temporary setback. After watching the city council meeting last Monday, I found out I was wrong. I am disappointed in your vote against the rebuilding of Hazlewood Avenue; I am not surprised though since I believe you have never come to grips with your job of representing the entire community and not just small pockets of people. I drive on Hazlewood Avenue once or twice a week as an alternative to white Bear Avenue. The condition of the street is bad, and is getting worse. The spring break -up of the street surface is a continual threat to the suspension of nay vehicle. There is basically no water run -off as the middle of the street is flat. As the area around St. Johns Hospital continues to develop, and if the proposed bridge over Highway 36 is build, traffic on Hazlewood will increase even more. On Sunday mornings, the cars parked on the east side of the street near the church present an additional safety hazard. Your city engineer said that the street was one of the worst 2 -3 streets in Maplewood. Tax money had been spent on proposed plans for rebuilding the street from County Road C to Beam Avenue. Both the city engineer and the consultant said they were willing to listen to the wishes of the residents with regards to the parking bays on the street. Your city engineer, using his expertise, said that merely milling the street and applying a new layer of asphalt would only be a band -aid approach. The city engineer also told about the need to improve the water run -off from rain and snowmelt. In spite of the condition of the road now, in spite of the comments and recommendations of the city staff, in spite of the comments of two of your fellow city council members, you still voted to turn down the project. What were you thinking? If you don't use the advice of the city engineer, why have one? why waste the money on preliminary design plans if they are not used? The city staff testified to the fairness of the city assessments for such projects; you evidently were not paying attention to that since you later asked the city engineer what would happen if the residents along Hazlewood were not assessed? So much for the concept P of fairness. The people complained about the costs and were told that there were a number options for paying the costs. You evidently didn't listen to that either. The resident who testified about the fact that he was in favor of the project if he didn't have to pay for it, but against the project if he did have to pay for it, pretty well typified the thoughts of the residents. Aren't all of us in this together and for the common good? I thought it to be somewhat of a sad comment when the two city council members who sit to your left sounded like statespeople compared to you. Aren't you the mayor for the entire community? Shouldn't you be expected to vote for the continued vitality of the entire community and not for the ill- informed residents of one stretch of city street. Isn't one of the goals of the city to have sidewalks along major streets? You turned down that opportunity. on Monday. Isn't another goal of the city of maintain and, when possible, improve the infrastructure of the city? You turned down that opportunity on Monday. Enough said. As I have said, I cannot say I was really disappointed or surprised by your actions on Monday night. I don't expect much of you, so I am not surprised. I am frankly embarrassed by many of your questions and comments during televised city council meetings. You seem to be_ poorly informed about the workings of city government, about the roles of people in government, and about the needs of Ma lewood and how Maplewood fits into the metropolitan area. hn Manthey t wo WA N� O OH _ � CL r ��--yy R r a ithle 1 ��'•� �►� .tom= `'�!M'.l'- 'CA ;p. \ ••••.ate � ! •a► NNry N.•1•� •Nw•t �: �l �- r .. •NVK U j ;' j t'i 7z WAN)( bz) ... . .a }�1 •w } •w.!H S K F t�. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer Action by Council ]Date Endorsed Modified SUBJECT: Legacy Village at Maplewood (Hajicek Property), City Project 02 -18 — Re ected-- Resolution Adopting a Final Alternative Urban Area -Wide Review (AJAR) Document and Mitigation Plan For The Legacy Village at Maplewood in the City of Maplewood DATE: May 6, 2003 Introduction On April 14, 2003, the city council approved the final distribution of the AUAR for the Hartford property. The assumptions of the AUAR do not imply approvals of density only an analysis of the environmental impacts of such a proposal. The AUAR is intended to establish the limits of environmental impact. The document has been distributed as required by statute and is ready for approval. Background On November 25, 2002, the city council authorized the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) of the Hijacek property in north Maplewood for a mixed land -use development proposed on the site. A development of the size proposed exceeds the threshold for environmental review, which required that the city council designate a procedure for an environmental review process. The developer of the property is the Hartford Group. Hartford hired SRF to prepare the AUAR environmental study and have a draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) prepared for the development scenario. The AUAR document has been circulated for comments and has been available on the city's website for inspection since January 2003. The final action on the AUAR for the city council is adoption of the Mitigation Plan. The Hartford Group has proposed development of the Hijacek site in north Maplewood with a mixture of single - family, senior housing, high- density residential property, retail property, medical office, and corporate office property. The proposed mixed -use development is consistent with the goals .of the comprehensive plan for this area of the city. The attached drawing shows a draft concept for the proposed development. The AUAR is an extensive review of the environmental impacts of the proposed development. The. following page includes a number of the specific impacts identified. The AUAR provides a mitigation plan that the council, acting as the Regulatory Governmental Unit (RGU), will be required to adopt. The EQB guidelines for an AUAR state: "It must be understood that the mitigation plan in the final document takes on the nature of a commitment by the RGU (City Council) to prevent potentially significant impacts from occurring from specific projects. It is more than just a list of ways to reduce impacts — it must include information about how the mitigation will be applied and assurance that it will. Otherwise, the AUAR may not be adequate and /or specific projects may lose their exemption from individual review." The council consideration of the proposed resolution is making a major commitment that the mitigation identified will occur, either as a requirement by the developer through the development contract, by a commitment to a public improvement, or involvement of other agencies, if appropriate. This includes the extension of County Road D, west of Hazelwood, which will be shared by the city and the City Council Agenda Report AUAR For Legacy Village At Maplewood May 6, 2003 Page Two developer in terms to be established in the development agreement. While the actual final alignment of County Road D is not set by the adoption of the resolution, the city council is stating their commitment to construct a County Road D extension at some location, as well as the other mitigation improvements such as water main improvements, wetland mitigation, and the noise abatement requirements, which are all listed in the attached final AUAR. AUAR Summary • Development scenario includes 318 units of multi - family townhomes; 244 units of multi - family row houses; 88 units of multi- family residential; 200 units of senior housing; 7.3 acres of retail/ restaurant; 9.8 acres of commercial /office; 3.1 acres of medical office; and 9.8 acres of green/ public space.. Proposed construction of the development is assumed to begin during spring of 2003 and anticipated completion is 2006. Approval of the AUAR establishes these as a maximum development scenario and does not suggest an approved land use scenario. • The traffic analysis indicates that the extension of County Road D west from Hazelwood Street must be installed for roadway impacts from the development to be mitigated. An extension of Kennard Street north from Beam is also required. Future improvements to White Bear Avenue, as recommended in the Mall Area Comprehensive Traffic Study, will be needed to mitigate area traffic growth and to solve the long- standing Mall area traffic problems. Improvements are also suggested at the TH 61 and 1 -694 intersection. The White Bear Avenue and TH 61 improvements are not a required mitigation listed within the AUAR because traffic growth was determined to have a much greater impact on traffic volumes than traffic from the proposed development. Both improvements will continue to be a high priority for the city due to the area growth - related traffic impacts and importance to the region. • Sanitary sewer capacity is adequate. in local sewers; however, the site is proposed to generate more flow than allocated by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) in the 2000 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. An error was discovered in the calculations of the Comprehensive Plan and a commitment to correct the plan is required. • A comprehensive storm water plan is required and is underway as part of the development process. The development is required to limit post - development runoff to pre - development levels using infiltration and storm ponds on -site. No new storm water infrastructure is anticipated off -site due to development related runoff increases. • Significant tree removal is anticipated due to project development and grading. The developer has proposed that existing trees be "...evaluated by an urban forester to identify.important .specimens, that should be preserved and /or existing trees that could be relocated within the development using a tree spade." This mitigation strategy will be a requirement of the development agreement. • Wetland impact is anticipated on the site. A total of six wetlands were identified during the site review. Included in the AUAR document are maps that identify Wetlands A through F. Wetlands A and B are proposed to be filled and mitigated within the site. The drainage ditch connecting to Wetland C will be filled and mitigated. All mitigation will be proposed on the project. The development is not proposed to impact the main basin of Wetland C, and is not proposed to impact Wetlands D, E or F, although the requirement to realign County Road D will likely impact Wetland E. That wetland impact is covered in the EAW prepared for the County Road D extension project. Wetland buffer requirements have been identified and are proposed to be implemented. Storm water will be required to be pre- treated before discharge to the wetlands • Water supply is adequate if a 12 -inch water main is extended from TH 61 along the existing County Road D alignment as recommended by the TH 61 /County Road D (Hillcrest Animal Hospital) Water Study in 2002. City Council Agenda Report AUAR. For Legacy Village At Maplewood May 6, 2003 Page Three • The DNR has noted that areas of the development have habitat similar to that preferred by the Blanding's turtle, a species listed as threatened in Minnesota, but no Blanding's turtles have been observed on the site. The DNR notes that the project site is not designated as an area of statewide importance for Blanding's turtle and no impact is anticipated. • A study of the air quality in the area indicates that no problems are anticipated. • A study of the noise in the area indicates that the northern -most portion of the site does not currently meet state nighttime noise standards due to the 1 -694 freeway noise. The residential units will be required to be designed to minimize noise impacts by providing climate - controlled units, increasing wall insulation and by providing common areas within the building courtyards. • The need for increased fire - and police protection is identified within the AUAR. The fire and police departments have determined that the proposed development will likely require two police officers based upon 1.5 officers per 1000 people and fire has estimated a need for eight new firefighters /paramedics throughout the city, of which two may need to be dedicated to this development. Additional study of financial commitment of the development's related tax base toward police and fire protection will occur as part of the PUD and Tax Abatement hearings. Agency /Resident Comments Attached are copies of the distribution list of the final AUAR. Two responses to the final distribution were received. The first response was from the Metropolitan Council. Their comments related to the Blanding's turtle and surface water runoff will be incorporated into the project planning. The second comment is from Charlotte Brooker. Ms. Brooker's concerns relate to 1 -694 freeway noise, wetland protection, retail locations, and mosquito control. Regarding Ms. Brooker's comments, staff recommends that the noise issue is an area issue, not specific to this development, although the development will include noise avoidance issues; the wetland protection and enhancement is part of the Wetlands Mitigation Plan; the retail location is a planning issue to be discussed as part of the upcoming development review; and the mosquito control issue is a separate city council policy debate not specific to this project. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution adopting the Final Alternative Urban Area -Wide Review Document and Mitigation Plan for.Legacy Village, City Project 02 -18. RCA jw Attachments: Preliminary Development Concept Plan Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (Previous Attachment) Responses to AUAR Final Distribution (2) Distribution List of Final AUAR Resolution o L 1 1 ................................................................................. -HrH T; 0 :--:- r_r� Li I F 0 ca - 1-j-�--) • - 11� Ir z O O Cd 0 0 ct ct (D t�o ct 0 r-. cn o 0 ct CN CV it ^ C4:; ct 25 Ir z O O Cd 0 0 ct ct (D t�o ct 0 r-. cn o 0 ct 1 et rapoli*Ltan Council Building communities that work R C I V E 0 April 28, 2003 Chuck Ahl Director of Public Works City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Legacy Village at Maplewood Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review FAUAR Metropolitan. Council District 11, 1. T ., Iv1L�� v -ppo li 'o•uncil Rererr a.l � ��� iv u. 1 0 Dear Mr. Ahl: The Metropolitan Council has conducted a review of the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (FAUAR). The FAUAR requires the Council to determine its adequacy and accuracy in addressing regional concerns. The City of Maplewood proposes to develop 86.8 acres located south of Interstate 694 and west of the existing Maplewood Mall. The proposed development plan includes 270,000 square feet of retail/ restaurant space, 850 housing units (some multi- family and senior apartments), and a 13,000 square foot community center. The. Council.'. s, review has concluded that the FAUAR is complete and accurate. The following are comments provided by technical staff: Environmental Services (James Larsen 651- 602 -1159) Item]] Fish, - Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources , The DNB's Natural Heritage database indicates that Blanding's turtles, a species listed as `threatened' in Minnesota, have historically been observed in the vicinity of this site and may be impacted b y the proposed development. In light of the determination that the on -site wetlands and surrounding vegetation proposed to be preserved match the type of habitat preferred by Blanding's turtles, Council staff recommends adding to the list of impact avoidance and mitigation mechanisms, the required use of .. q sx�rmountabl.e curbs within. the proposed development Pa. Item 17 — Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff - The AUAR states that City and Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District RWMWD re ( ) ulations g require that post - development discharges remain at or below existing rates, and that infiltration be promoted on -site, to reduce overall surface water discharges and maximize ground water discharge. The document further states that while Wetland E in the northwest portion of the site outlets to an existing storm sewer pipe, the other, more significant wetland complex in the southeast portion of the site does not have an off -site outlet, meaning a zero out -flow rate. Fortunately, most on -site soils are characterized as having moderately rapid to rapid permeability,. and, will accommodate low-impact development infiltration techniques. 'It therefore seems that _ p p incorporation of infiltration tecluli ues into the proposed q P P development will need to be a vef-y important project component. Council staff concurs with the City and RVVNIV,TD promotion of on -site infiltration facilities, and recommends .their incorporation into .the . proposed development. wwvcT.metrocouncil. org Metro .Info Line 602 -1888 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 (651) 602 -1000 Fax 602 -1550 TTY 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunittl Emplouer Chuck Ahl April 28, 2003 Page 2 This concludes the Council's review of the FAUAR. The Council will take no formal action or file an objection on the FAUAR. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Chris Stark, principal reviewer, at 651- 602 -1750. Sincerely, r •• � .w` f l •may 'ti./ ,� � si Phyllis Hanson Manager, Planning and Technical Assistance cc: Brig a ` Minnesota Depa- tmenn of Iranspo� ration: Marcel Eibensteiner, Metropolitan Council District 11 Caren Dewar Deputy Regional Administrator Keith Buttleman, Director, MCES Environmental Planning and Evaluation Department Ann Beckman, Acting Director, Planning and Growth Management Bob Mazanec, Sector Representative, Planning and Technical Assistance Christy Stark, Planner, Planning and Technical Assistance Cheryl Olsen, Referrals Coordinator, Planning and Technical Assistance V • \sg� F �;1' sqq 'x'Ffgz3z f Ci• ''•-}�iA, g: ,, -� t ` �, t.f •q ^ss� - •; ;; ,. ''tt s. <'n` FN ; � ?•Z ` s{ ••, [s 5�- .1 s.bhb.. .t.: a '.4.... si. a5,rt�x•c f. +� ;:.i• ca: :t.+ '!s, .i f t/ .• o'e 4Zt SSf �t:2V' . T A sR I ���,• sc �' • <3 ag , i�.. i ri `2- „ .. ci( a• v. J . W. O.uck Ahl Director of Public works City of Maplewood. 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, W 551 Chuck Ahl and Maplewood City Council T hank YOU for sen the AIUAR: document �vitli e response to cornnents. I need to emphasize- once again what my m as �.: points - .. . Y p is were �n my initial letter. Regard Nbise - This part of Maplewood is extr • emely negatively impacted by the noise from 1694. The. noise-extends way into nei hborhr�o • . g ds, augmented b� the no3.se from Hwy 3� and H 61. It Lis one 6f the negative :as ects of .the :� p r�.entrup Farm area. I would ae the city to explore noase� red�ct�an: �rorl� with the road authoriti� •� . • R es. This co discover that noise- is ,a negative quality of life Issue. My con3:ment about. the natural wetlands and the bu ffers � . - uffers was meant to- suggest that in this type Of an area wide plan the governmental g unit - .can : beyond the nnn�mum protections. I do not. think that the city and. watershed district standards are protecttve� far ether #lie. regi�e �or for the best functioning of �#he water . e wil � ' dlife. Frogs. and turtles need a lot of :space out - of the wetland and they need: corridors.. Th parcel whatever, hnt b .. � � P � can be developed for housing, and ecause �.t � so large it can also keep same of the best habitat functions.. bons.. M y con Meth. on the SE corner � and the ba d i of putting re in there with . e lies and p arkin g lot �noff � just #lie noise . . of commerce is still valid You have the chance to .protect. a corner- of the Property that would not • not comprorn"se the rest of the- site. 1agree with Mark Gern.eS .statements as well. Please consider din . more ecological review with • w dlife professionals,. I also disagree m4ffi adding more mosquito con�#rol chemicals ' � em�.cals m our wetlands contain .. Natural wetland wetland en predators to maintain a lower - o. � .illation - P P of nuisance Mosquitoes. Charte 2172 wo€ dlynn Avenue Maplewood, -T 551 651 - 777 -49.45 c.c. Marls ernes Council Member Xathy Juen.emann and ether Council M ay-o r or Bob Cardin members y al -- City Manager " K . - m MORA t L V M TO: EAW /AUAR Distribution List FROM: Chuck Ahl, Director of Public Works City of Maplewood DATE: April 15, 2003 RE: LEGACY VILLAGE AT MAPLEWOOD FINAL ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW AND MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA On behalf of the City of Maplewood SRF Consulting r g oup, Inc. is transmitting the enclosed Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) and Miti anon Plan far the proposed g p posed Legacy Village at Maplewood in the City of Maplewood. Please make this document available for public review through April 16, 2003. The Final AUAR has been revised based on comments. received during he Environmental nviranmental Quality Board (EQB) public comment period ending February . 2003 and includes des a section specifically responding to each timely, substantive comment received. This document is being distributed to the EAW /AUAR E B ' Q distribution, list and those who provided written comments on the Draft AUAR. State a encies and the Metropolitan ' g p n Council of the Twin Cities have 10 days from the date of receipt of this document to file an objection, J tion, as provided for in Minnesota Rules. Chapter 4410.3610 Sub art 5 D with the City of Maplewood p ( )� ty Project Contact Person: Chuck Ahl, Director of Public- Works Ci � of Maplewood, Works, ty p od, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, MN 55109; phone: 651/770 4552• - facsimile: 651/770 -4506, email: chuck. ahl a_4ci_.maplevwood.mn.us Unless an objection is filed the City of ' J t Maplewood i s anticipated to adopt the Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan on May 12 2003. Any questions about the Final AUAR and Mitigation Plan Person. r g n can be directed to the Project Contact CA/ Enclosures cc: Elizabeth Kautz, Hartford Group Bill Griffith, Larkin Hoffman Daly and Lindgren Jennie Ross, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. H-\Planning \4550 \Correspondence\Final AUAR \text for distr ltrs- cmb- 032401doc smooth Fee Sheets TM EAW /AUAR Distribution List ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD (1) Environmental Review Program 300 Centennial Office Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55155 Ms. Becky Balk (1) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 90 West Plato Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55107 Ms. Marya White (1) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Suite 500 85 Seventh Place East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2198 Mr. Gerald Larson (3) Mn/DOT Environmental Services MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 620 St. Paul, MN 55155 Ms. Beth Lockwood, Supervisor (3) MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Environmental Review Unit/MajorslRem Division 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 Ms. Carol Blackburn (2) LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY 645 State; Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Mr. Wiliam D. Franz (1) Chief of Environmental Review U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIOIaI AGENCY — REGION 5 MAIL CODE W -157 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, EL 60604 -3590 Use template for 5162 4/15/2003 Mr. Jim Haertel (1) MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER &SOIL RESOURCES One West Water St., Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55107 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (1) Environmental Health Division Policy, Planning and Analysis Unit 121 East Seventh Place, Suite 230 St. Paul, MN 55101 Ms. Rebecca Wooden (3) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Environmental Review Unit 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 -4010 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY (l) State Historical Preservation Office Level A 345 Kellogg Boulevard West - St. Paul MN 55102 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LIBRARY (2) Minneapolis Public Library 300 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 Mr. Robert Whiting (1) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Regulatory Functions Branch Army Corps of Engineers Center 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101 -1638 U.S . FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE" (1) Twin Cities Field Office E.S. 4101 East 80th Street Bloomington, MN 55425 -1665 :1 Planning \4550 \CorrespondencelFinal AUAR1 FinalAUAR- EAWDistributionLabels- 032603 .doc V AVERY® Address Labels ����- joth Feed Sheets fry AW /AUAR Distribution List Ms. Linda Milashius, Referrals METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Cliff Aichinger District Staff Administrator RAMSEY- WASHINGTON METRO WATERSHED DIsTRICT 1902 County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Bill Griffith Larkin Hoffman Daly and Lindgren 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55431 George and Kathy Supan 3050 Hazelwood Street Maplewood, MN 55109 Charlotte Brooker 2172 Woodlyn Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Also need labels for: • RGU(s) • City /County Library and Regional Development Library (may be same thing) • Possibly the WMO or )7VD • Regional Dev. Commission (if applicable) • Approximately 5 copies for file NOTE: Mail to Anoka County Branch Iibraries must all be sent through the main Anoka County Library. Use tempura for' - 162@ 4/15/2003 Maplewood Branch RAMSEY COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 1670 Beam Avenue Maplewood, NIN 55109 Elizabeth Kautz Hartford Group, Inc. 12100 Singletree Lane, Suite 103 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 -7933 Chuck Ahl, Director of Public Works City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood MN 55109 Gerald. and Linda Peterson 3016 Hazelwood Street N Maplewood, MN 55109 Marc Germs 1837 McKnight Road Maplewood, MN 55109 Mr. Larry K. Houck, P. A. Attu: Michael Hoganson Suite 315 1611 West County Road B Roseville, MN 55113 -4053 :\ Planning \4550 \Correspondence\Final AUAR\ FinalAUAR- EAWDistributionLabels- 032603.doe n CEN IE@ Addres.S. L a CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. XX -XX A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A FINAL ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREA WIDE REVIEW (AUAR) DOCUMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE LEGACY VILLAGE AT MAPLEWOOD IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD. WHEREAS, on November 25, 2002 the Maplewood City Council authorized preparation of an AUAR for the Legacy Village at Maplewood project; and WHEREAS, on January 6, 2003, the draft AUAR was prepared and distributed in accordance with Minnesota Environmental Review Program procedures; and WHEREAS, the 30 -day public review and comment period on the draft AUAR environmental analysis document ended on February 5, 2003; and WHEREAS, the draft AUAR was revised and includes a plan for mitigation specifying the mitigation measures that will be imposed upon further development within the study area in order to avoid or mitigate potential environmental impaets; WHEREAS, the revised AUAR was submitted to the Maplewood City Council on March 31, 2003, for review; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council approved resolution #03 -04 -058 authorizing distribution of the final AUAR and mitigation plan for the Legacy Village at Maplewood in accordance with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Review Program procedures; and WHEREAS, no objections to the final AUAR environmental analysis document and mitigation plan were filed with the City of Maplewood within the time limit prescribed by state law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the final AUAR environmental analysis document and mitigation plan for the Legacy Village at Maplewood is hereby adopted. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD THIS 12 DAY OF May, 2003. Attest: Mayor City Clerk AGENDA ITEM CJ AGENDA REPORT Action by Council TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager Date .. Endoryead - FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer Modified - - Rejected SUBJECT: Kennard Street Improvements (Beam to Count Road D Project - Y }� ect 03 -04— ! Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Preliminary Report DATE: May 6, 2003 Introduction /Summary The development of the Legacy Village at Maplewood (Hajicek property) will require the extension of Kennard Street northerly from Beam Avenue to County Road D. The developer has established a cash escrow to assure payment of city costs for appropriate studies. This is one of the necessary improvements that the city will implement as part of the development. A resolution to begin the process is recommended. Background The extension of Kennard Street through the Legacy Village at Maplewood development is required for area traffic flow. A majority of the project cost will be- borne by the developer. of the site, the Hartford Group. They have signed a development agreement and provided a cash escrow for costs incurred as part of the development. On December 23, 2002, the city council authorized the preliminary study of this project. It is now appropriate to begin the construction planning process. This project is a state aid route and should be designed, administered and constructed under the supervision of the engineering staff. Authorization to proceed with the Feasibility Report and Public Hearing phases is recommended to coordinate with the development process. The developer has agreed to reimburse the city for any engineering costs should the Legacy Village Development not be approved or be withdrawn. Budget Impact The original project budget established in December 2002 was $15,000. An additional $15,000 is needed for this next phase. A consultant engineer, SEH Engineers, will prepare the report. The study cost will be paid as part of the project funding. If the developer withdraws from the project, the cash escrow will reimburse the city for the funds expended. Recommendation Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution Ordering the Preparation of the Preliminary Report for the Kennard Street Improvements (Beam to County Road D ), Project 03 -04, and authorize the finance director to transfer an additional $15,000 to the project fund. RCA jW Attachment: Resolution Site Map RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY . WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to Kennard Street, from Beam Avenue to County Road D, City Project 03 -04, and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, on December 23, 2002, the City Council adopted a resolution to prepare preliminary costs and alignment options for this route and appropriated $15 for this purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. FURTHERMORE, additional funds in the amount of $15,000 are appropriated to complete this feasibility report. q, 13 A ff - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t I 1 • \` \ --- -- - -------- - ------------------------ - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------------------------------------------------- -- OREM CD WE Rgli MEN, - , + V?; I MARM `5 ::� ji'M 1 ' j �STJeUll�T igXrEA)SIOd 7M. 115 y 11 CY RAM Mi I M: 41300111 ------------------------------- - --- - ---- - - - - -- - ---- ------------------------------------- - - -- H inos - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ON iw I "M �1- Z, w 0 1 M ffil ffigN iffi A �tQl I ztl�l ' A l l 10 000 am No wim Page 1 of 3 ��Z�0.3 Chuck AN 'v From: MARK GERNES [hoppy_g @msn.com] Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 11:33 PM To: chuck.ahl @ci.maplewood.mn.us Subject: Comments from Mark Gernes on the MMATI May 11, 2003 Mr. Charles Ahl. Director of Public Works /City Engineer City of Maplewood Dear Mr. Ah I : RE: Comments on the Storm water and wetlands plan for the Maplewood Mall Areas Transportation Improvements project area. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the April 8, 2003 Storm water and wetlands plan for the Maplewood Mall Areas Transportation Improvements (MMATI) project area. It is my understanding that the Maplewood City Council will move to accept or reject this project ,plan at their May 12, 2003 meeting. Unfortunately I will not be able to attend this meeting as I will be out of town,doing wetland field work in the SW part of the state. I hope in this message to convey my comments and thoughts on this plan. Overall I believe that SEH and the other consultants involved have done a good job with this plan. I do however have a few thoughts for your consideration. One .page 5 the end of the first paragraph I assume the reference should be to Co Rd "D" rather than "C" as stated. On page 7 there is a reference about going under the existing AMOCO pipeline. In the hopefully unlikely event the pipeline were to fail near this location the storm sewer. would likely make for artificial conveyances of any released product. I would propose the storm sewer be encased within a secondary containment system or otherwise properly sealed in the area of this crossing to prevent any released product from making its way into the storm sewer system. On page 7 there is a reference to the inadequacy of this plan to assure the proposed post project runoff rates will be maintained at existing conditions during the 2 and 10 yr 24 -hr storm events. These smaller events can often be more difficult to manage in part due to their frequency. Yet changes in the rate during these smaller events can have great ecological consequences. As you know one of the best ways to manage these smaller events is through increased infiltration. I strongly encourage including more discussion of various infiltration system siting options within the MMATI. There is some discussion of this on pages 8 & 9 and in appendix D but only in general terms. Without more details provided on this important topic one has no choice but to simply trust that in fact these systems will be given priority. Indeed the plan acknowledges that there is only limited use of infiltration systems in the Co Rd. D realignment. I recommend considering taking full advantage of these kind of opportunities in the Co Rd D realignment. 5/12/2003 Page 2 of 3 Because in most cases these infiltration systems require ongoing maintenance I recommend that covenants be placed on the deeds associated with the development within Legacy Village. Additionally I recommend some provision for a storm utility be put in placed to provide the City perhaps in cooperation with the watershed district the long term resources needed to maintain these kind of infiltration systems along the realigned Co Rd. D. The discussion in appendix D and the worksheets in this appendix are very good and should be referenced more frequently in the plan. The comment made on page 10 about low vegetative quality of wetlands associated within the MMATI is true in some cases however it simply is not true of wetland G which directly S. of the Excel transfer station. The 1997 Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District Surface Water Management Plan classified this wetland as a preserve type wetland. As such it is my understanding the City buffer ordinance would require a 100 ft buffer,yet this is the wetland which would be most affected by the proposed realignment of Co. Rd D. I believe there are still opportunities to avoid a larger portion of this wetland by moving the alignment east approximately 200 ft. Though the cost would likely be prohibitive, I suggest for permitting purposes that if the alignment can't be shifted east to avoid the wetland that part of the roadway might be put on piers and routed above the wetland. If. possible I would like to see the RODM data sheets which are referenced in Appendix B but not included there. The plan mentions mitigating for wetland losses at a 2:1 acre for acre basis however there is no mention of the wetland type that would be replaced. Some of the wetland mitigation appears to be planned for a current nonwetland area on the adjacent golf course. Yet the draft wetland permit application in appendix E references a wetland replacement in Wright Co. I suggest that in an area the size of the MMATI and Legacy Village that there are other options for replacing approximately 3.77 acres. If not then efforts must be made to at least stay within the watershed. I would also suggest exploring options for mitigation credit in enhancing existing wetland resources within the project area.One suggestion might be the elimination of Reed Canary grass from around wetland F and replace it with higher quality wetland grasses and or sedges. Similar opportunities might be possible around wetlands C & D as well as wetland G. For the record I have heard very strong choruses of the Western Chorus Frogs calling from wetland F the last several weeks. Lastly I would suggest that the monitoring of the mitigation actions which is planned for approximately 5 -years also be extended to the wetlands C, D, E and G which will be largely preserved. Basically I am concerned that not only do we need to be assured that loss of wetland attributes are indeed replaced but also that wetlands which remain on the landscape are in fact retained and managed as naturally functioning wetlands. Just because they will be more urban in nature doesn't mean they necessarily will loose their integrity. After all storm discharges are planned to be pretreated for rate volume and pollutant loading before being discharged into these natural wetlands. Monitoring of these basins will assure that "we" got it right this time and another natural wetland doesn't get flooded or otherwise lost like the basin on the east side of the Mall near the former Bruntrup Farmstead. The City should require an assurance bond with the developer /contractor to provide for reconstruction of the inlet /outlet and treatment systems if in fact "we" didn't get it right. Given the stage of information available in the proposed Legacy Village and the Co Rd D realignment I hope the City Council accepts this Storm water and wetlands plan for _the Maplewood Mall Areas Transportation Improvements project area and allows the project to proceed to the next step. Thank you again for the opportunity to review and comment on this document. I recognize the challenges of writing a plan at a point when many decisions and details of the what is likely to 5/12/2003 Page 3 of 3 happen on the ground have not yet been made. I hope to have the opportunity to review and comment on the next level of documentation /plans for this project. I talked this evening with Council person Ms. Kathy unenman and she suggested p y that you might be able to fortyard these comments to her city email address. Could you please forward my comments to her city email address or place a copy in her mail box, thank you. Sincerely, Mark Gernes 1837 Mcknight Rd. Maplewood, MN S/12/2003 DAP rojects \Maple \030500 \Fig5ProposedPonds. mxd 1 Ilk 1, D A D o. N 0 (D Z c om c) 3 w cn Q o CD s o� a r r D m cn D 0 o rn CL ao �z z m Z v - v D Z XAf m D C Z ;t "' ;r D2Z � ° Z V ^ mA v D ^ m 0 O� ry 0 00o Z y n a' A � I vi v:E:E0 . °mmZ � mmv �. J A � m m m 0 i is a - fP � m ME-" • o O Ohm O w p,�0 Q 71 wo_. �aa m N O CD V/ Is"I m N O� _ G m m 0 rt N ° w m c w m o 3 (p - m Cl) c° >D _ m _c o n O N CD C D2Z � ° Z V ^ mA v D ^ m 0 O� ry 0 00o Z y n a' A � I vi v:E:E0 . °mmZ � mmv �. J A � m m m 0 i is a - fP � m i 'l� pt D2Z� —mmZ °mav C ME-" • all m 71 � 71 Is"I i 'l� pt D2Z� —mmZ °mav C D - U O D O Z - I m I D - U O D O Z - I m DIz'o 0 ° p p Z m;- v Z 0 CD - 0 = CD CD sr C y < w a o p ? x w m 0 0 CD CD v 1000 o � d 0 0 0 X CD 3 a o w_ CD D ET to n _0 a m m ti = rD w 0 D m w l4 0 - 0 0 w m O" 0 a m O m m w CD o_ CD m o_ (/1 r- - r 'm cD 3 c Q. c a D CD J I N