Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 06-13 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, June 13, 2011 City Hall, Council Chambers Meeting No. 11-11 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country. C. ROLL CALL Mayor’s Address on Protocol: “Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. Before addressing the council, sign in with the City Clerk. At the podium please state your name and address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. The Mayor will then direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments.” D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of May 23, 2011, City Council Workshop Minutes 2. Approval of May 23, 2011, City Council Meeting Minutes F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Resolution of Appreciation for Girl Scout Samantha Nielsen 2. Swearing in Ceremony for Assistant Chief/EMS Michael Mondor – No Report G. CONSENT AGENDA – Items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and non- controversial and are approved by one motion of the council. If a councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment regarding an item, the vote should be held until the questions or comments are made then the single vote should be taken. If a councilmember objects to an item it should be removed and acted upon as a separate item. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Consider Approval to Seek Bids for Joy Park Improvements Phase II 3. Approval of Lawful Gambling Temporary Permit for White Bear Avenue Business Association 4. Consider Approval of Fund Transfer to Close CoPar Project Fund 05-08 5. Approval of Resolution Authorizing Purchase of Insurance Agent Services 6. Approval of Carsgrove Meadows Area Street Improvements, City Project 08-10, Resolution Approving Final Payment and Acceptance of Project 7. Approval of Parking Lot Light Pole Replacements for City Campus 8. Approval of Uniform Contract with G&K 9. Approval of Maplewood Community Center Court Area Lighting Installation 10. Approval of Resolution to Maintain Statutory Tort Liability Limits. H. PUBLIC HEARINGS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Approval of Myth Nightclub Shared Parking Agreement with 3000 White Bear Avenue J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of Conditional Use Permit for Auto Sales by Fleet Associates, Inc. at 2495 Maplewood Drive. 2. Approval of Seventh Street East and Ferndale Street Right-of-Way Vacations, 2505 Minnehaha Avenue East K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. AWARD OF BIDS M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS N. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS O. ADJOURNMENT Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk’s Office at 651.249.2001 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings – elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language. May 23, 2011 City Council Manager Workshop Minutes 1 Agenda Item E1 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL MANAGER WORKSHOP 5:15 p.m., Monday, May 23, 2011 Council Chambers, City Hall A. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order at 5:15 p.m. by Mayor Rossbach. B. ROLL CALL Will Rossbach, Mayor Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present James Llanas, Councilmember Present John Nephew, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Llanas. Ayes – All The motion passed. D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Trash Collection System Analysis Update i. Environmental Planner, Shann Finwall gave the report and answered questions of the council. ii. Assistant City Manager, Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl addressed and answered questions of the council. E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation on 2010 Audit of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report i. Finance Manager, Gayle Bauman introduced the item and the presenter, Mr. Dave Mol. ii. Auditor, HLB Tautges Redpath, Dave Mol gave the presentation and answered questions of the council. F. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Rossbach adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Packet Page Number 1 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 1 Agenda Item E2 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m., Monday, May 23, 2011 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 10-11 A. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Rossbach. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Will Rossbach, Mayor Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present James Llanas, Councilmember Present John Nephew, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The following items were added to the agenda by councilmembers: F2. Resolution of Commendation – Mayor Rossbach N1. Support of Veterans Clinic – Councilmember Koppen, Mr. Antonen N2. Resident Letter, Teenage Bullying – Councilmember Llanas N3. National Night Out – Councilmember Juenemann Councilmember Llanas moved to approve the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Nephew. Ayes – All The motion passed. E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of May 9, 2011, City Council Workshop Minutes Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the May 9, 2011, City Council Workshop Minutes as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen. Ayes – All The motion passed. 2. Approval of May 9, 2011, City Council Meeting Minutes Amended minutes were provided to the city council at the meeting. Councilmember Juenemann had a correction to page 30, N1. It should read May 1 not May 8. Packet Page Number 2 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 2 Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the May 9, 2011, City Council Meeting Minutes as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Llanas. Ayes – All The motion passed. F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Local Government Innovation Award for Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Maplewood and the City of North St. Paul a. Parks & Recreation Manager, Audra Robbins gave the presentation. Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the Innovation Award for Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Maplewood and the City of North St. Paul. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 2. Resolution of Commendation a. Mayor Rossbach introduced Girl Scout, Kirsten Klaver and then presented her with the resolution of commendation. b. Kirsten Klaver addressed the council and gave a presentation. Mayor Rossach moved to approve the resolution of commendation for Kirsten Klaver. City of Maplewood Resolution 11-5-573 Commendation for Kirsten Klaver May 23, 2011 Whereas, the City of Maplewood finds it to be important to recognize the achievements of its citizens, and Whereas, our youth are the future leaders of our City, State, and Nation, and Whereas, the City Council is pleased to learn that Kirsten Klaver chose to pursue the Girl Scout Gold Award, and Whereas, Kirsten Klaver is an active member of the Minnesota and Wisconsin River Valley Girl Scouts, an organization that mentors youth, and Whereas, the requirements of the Gold Award are only achieved by 5 % of all Girl Scouts, and Whereas, Kirsten has completed all the requirements for the Girl Scout Gold Award, the highest award which can be achieved by a Girl Scout, including planning, financing and implementing the project, and has committed a large amount of her personal time, and Packet Page Number 3 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 3 Whereas, the Gold Award develops leadership, responsibility and community involvement, now therefore Be it resolved, that the Maplewood City Council does hereby commend Kirsten on her accomplishments, her leadership, and her community involvement, and Be it resolved, I Mayor, Will Rossbach, as authorized by the Maplewood City Council, do extend the city’s appreciation and gratitude for the dedication and hard work put forth by Kirsten and her example to other young adults and that the City of Maplewood duly record her accomplishments. _______________________________ Mayor Will Rossbach Attest: ________________________ Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. G. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Nephew moved to approve consent agenda items 1-9. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 1. Approval of Claims Councilmember Nephew moved Approval of Claims. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 128,846.83 Checks #84242 thru #84290 Dated 05/04/11 thru 05/10/11 $ 356,246.15 Disbursements via debits to checking account Dated 04/28/11 thru 05/06/11 $ 242,346.07 Checks #84291 thru #84357 Dated 05/09/11 thru 05/17/11 $ 138,393.53 Disbursements via debits to checking account Dated 05/06/11 thru 05/13/11 __________________ $ 865,832.58 Total Accounts Payable Packet Page Number 4 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 4 PAYROLL $ 533,036.90 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 05/13/11 $ 2,883.96 Payroll Deduction check #9984282 thru #9984286 dated 05/13/11 ___________________ $ 535,920.86 Total Payroll $ 1,401,753.44 GRAND TOTAL Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 2. Approval of Ramsey County Fair Temporary Gambling Permit and Fee Waiver Request Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the fee waiver for 3.2 beer and the resolution for a temporary gambling permit for St. Paul East Parks Lions Club at the Ramsey County Fair, 2020 White Bear Avenue, July 13 through July 17, 2011. RESOLUTION 11-5-574 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the temporary permit for lawful gambling is approved for St. Paul East Parks Lions Club to be used at the Ramsey County Fair, 2020 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, MN from July 13 through July 17, 2011. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 3. Approval to Accept Grant From Midwest Economic Crime Foundation Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the $900 grant from Midwest Economic Crime Foundation and use the funds to purchase a laptop computer for use by our retail and financial crimes investigators. RESOLUTION 11-5-575 AUTHORIZING GIFT TO CITY WHEREAS, Maplewood is AUTHORIZED to receive and accept grants, gifts and devices of real and personal property and maintain the same for the benefit of the citizens and pursuant to the donor’s terms if so-prescribed, and; Packet Page Number 5 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 5 WHEREAS, Midwest Economic Crime Foundation (MECF) wishes to grant the City of Maplewood the following: $900, and; WHEREAS, Midwest Economic Crime Foundation has instructed that the City will be required to use the aforementioned for: the purchase of a laptop computer to be used by retail and financial crimes investigators of the Maplewood Police Department, and; WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has agreed to use the subject of this resolution for the purposes and under the terms prescribed, and; WHEREAS, the City agrees that it will accept the gift by a super majority of its governing body’s membership pursuant to Minnesota Statute §465.03; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to Minnesota Statute §465.03, that the Maplewood City Council approves, receives and accepts the gift aforementioned and under such terms and conditions as may be requested or required. The Maplewood City Council passed this resolution by a super majority vote of its membership on May 23, 2011. Signed: Signed: Witnessed: ___________________ ____________________ ___________________ (Signature) (Signature) (Signature) Mayor______________ Chief of Police_________ City Clerk____________ (Title) (Title) (Title) ___________________ _____________________ ____________________ (Date) (Date) (Date) Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 4. Approval of Resolution Requesting the State Legislature and the Governor Maintaining Ramsey County Within a Single Congressional District Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the resolution requesting the State Legislature and the Governor maintaining Ramsey County within a single Congressional District. Resolution 11-5-576 Requesting the State Legislature and the Governor Maintain Ramsey County within a Single Congressional District that Includes the Entire City of Maplewood WHEREAS, Date from the 2010 Census requires the Minnesota Legislature to re-draw Congressional boundaries into eight districts with 662,991 people in each district; and WHEREAS, Ramsey County is Minnesota’s second largest county and is the center of economic development, regional transportation, and unique communities of interest in the East Metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, Ramsey County has effectively been in a single Congressional District as a whole political unit since 1891; and Packet Page Number 6 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 6 WHEREAS, Maintaining Ramsey County as a whole political unit in a single Congressional District will preserve communities of interest along with their unique cultural, economic, and historic connections to the County and the East Metropolitan area, and WHEREAS, The Congressional District redistricting principles used after the 2000 Census stated that, “The districts will be drawn with attention to county, city, and township boundaries. A county, city, or township will not be divided into more than one district except as necessary to meet equal population requirements or to form districts that are composed of convenient, contiguous, and compact territory. When any county, city, or township must be divided into one or more districts, it will be divided into as few districts as possible”; and WHEREAS, Ramsey County seeks to maintain all fifteen municipalities which are entirely contained within its borders as whole political units within a single Congressional District; Now, Therefore, Be it RESOLVED, The City of Maplewood requests the State Legislature and the Governor to formulate a redistricting plan that maintains Ramsey County as a whole political unit and preserves the County’s unique communities of interest in a single Congressional District that includes the City of Maplewood in its entirety. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 5. Consider Approval of Amendment of Conditions for the Gervais Woods Preliminary Plat, South of LaBore Road, East of Arcade Street. Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the amendments of conditions for the Gervais Woods Preliminary Plat, South of Labore Road, East of Arcade Street. Amending condition 1.f. of the March 22, 2010 preliminary plat approval to read (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): 1. Approve the preliminary and final plat for Landmark Development of Minnesota for the proposed eleven lot Gervais Woods single-family subdivision located south of Labore Road and East of arcade Street. This subdivision is subject to the following conditions: f. The proposed homes on lots 4 and 5, block 2 of this subdivision may extend beyond the municipal boundary line into Maplewood since the City Administrator of the city of Little Canada has agreed that Little Canada would assume all building permit review and building inspection responsibilities for these homes, and also, since this poses no problem with the Ramsey county Assessor’s office. The proposed homes on the southerly four lots of this subdivision shall be constructed in the footprints shown on the applicant’s plans. This would require that they be located in the City of Little Canada. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 6. Consider Approval of Resolution Identifying Maplewood’s Commitment to Host a Minnesota GreenCorps Member Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the resolution identifying Maplewood’s Commitment to Host a Minnesota GreenCorps Member in the area of Pollution Reduction and Recycling. Packet Page Number 7 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 7 RESOLUTION 11-5-577 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING MAPLEWOOD’S COMMITMENT TO HOST A MINNESOTA GREENCORPS MEMBER WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has applied to host an AmeriCorps member from the Minnesota GreenCorps, a program of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), for the 2011-2012 program year; and WHEREAS, if the MPCA selects the City of Maplewood, the organization is committed to implementing the proposed project as described in the host site application, and in accordance with pre-scoped position description; and WHEREAS, MPCA requires that the City of Maplewood enter into a host site agreement with MPCA that identifies the terms, conditions, roles and responsibilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Maplewood hereby agrees to enter into and sign a host site agreement with the MPCA to carry out the member activities specified therein and to comply with all of the terms, conditions, and matching provisions of the host site agreement. The Maplewood City Council authorizes and directs Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner, to sign the grant agreement on its behalf. Adopted this 23rd day of May, 2011. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Mayor Clerk Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 7. Western Hills Area Street Improvements, City Project 10-14, Approval of Purchase for Geotechnical Testing Services Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the city engineer enter into a contract for services with Chosen Valley Testing for $21,964.00 for testing and quality control-services for the Western Hills Area Street Improvements, City Project 10-14. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 8. Western Hills Area Street Improvements, City Project, 10-14, Approval of Rider to Joint Powers Agreement With Saint Paul Regional Water Services. Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the 4th Rider to the existing July 1961 agreement between the Board of Water Commissioners and the City of Maplewood. The council directs the Mayor and City Manager to sign the 4th Rider signifying city council approval Minor revisions as approved by the City Attorney are authorized as needed for the agreement. And authorize the city engineer to enter into a supplemental agreement with T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. to add Saint Paul Regional Water Services as additional insured to the Western Hills Area Street Improvement project comprehensive insurance policy. Packet Page Number 8 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 8 Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 9. NPDES Phase II and MS4 Permit, Call Public Hearing for June 27, 2011, at 7:00 p.m. Councilmember Nephew moved to approve calling for a public hearing on June 27, 2011, at 7:00 p.m. to meet the NPDES requirement and to solicit feedback on the updated SWPPP. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. H. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Gladstone Area Redevelopment Improvements, Project 04-21 a. Assessment Hearing, 7:00 p.m. – To be Continued to June 27, 2011 i. City Engineer, Deputy Public Works Director, Michael Thompson gave the report. Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing. No one addressed the council. Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. Councilmember Juenemann moved to continue the assessment hearing for the project to the June 27, 2011, city council meeting. The bid opening will be continued to June 3, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. in council chambers, and the award of bid will be considered by the city council at the June 13, 2011, city council meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Nephew. Ayes – All The motion passed. I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Consider Approval of Resolution Adopting the 2012 – 2016 Capital Improvement Plan a. Assistant City Manager, Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl gave the presentation. b. Chairperson, BEDC, Mark Jenkins gave the report from the Business & Economic Development Commission. c. Planning Commissioner, Joe Boeser, gave the report from the Planning Commission. Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the resolution which adopts the 2012 – 2016 Capital Improvement Plan as proposed. RESOLUTION 11-5-578 ADOPTING THE 2012 – 2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council established city-wide goals for financial sustainability and facility planning as part of the annual Council – Staff Retreat in February 2011, and WHEREAS, the City Manager has supervised the Management Staff in preparing the 2012 – 2016 Capital Improvement Plan, and Packet Page Number 9 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 9 WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended approval of said 2012 – 2016 Capital Improvement Plan as being consistent with the City Council goals, and WHEREAS, the City’s Business and Economic Development Commission; the Park and Recreation Commission, the Housing Redevelopment Authority; the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission and the Planning Commission have all recommended adoption of the proposed 2012 – 2016 Capital Improvement Plan without revision, and WHEREAS, the City’s Planning Commission has duly conducted on May 17, 2011, consistent with state statute, a Public Hearing regarding the consistency of said 2012 Capital Improvement Plan, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reported that they have found the 2012 – 2106 Capital Improvement Plan to be substantially consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, that, Said 2012 – 2106 Capital Improvement Plan is hereby adopted and approved as proposed and recommended by the City Manager and shall become a document as part of the 2012 Budget. Adopted this 23rd day of May, 2011. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen. Ayes – All The motion passed. 2. Western Hills Area Street Improvement Wetland Impacts, City Project 10-14 Approval to Construct Public Improvements Within Wetland Buffer (This item was heard out of order and after I. 3.) a. Civil Engineer, Steve Kummer gave the report. Councilmember Llanas moved to approve the wetland buffer waiver for the western hills area street improvement, city project 10-14. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. 3. Western Hills Area Street Improvements, Project 10-14, Resolution Adopting Revised Assessment Roll (This item was heard out of order before I. 2. because residents were present to speak) a. City Engineer, Public Works Director, Michael Thompson gave the report and answered questions of the council. b. City Attorney, Alan Kantrud addressed and answered questions of the council. c. Assistant City Manager, Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl answered questions of the council. Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone would like to address the council. 1. Bill Taylor, Maplewood. 2. Eileen Eaves, Maplewood. 3. Mary Kay Skelly, Maplewood. Packet Page Number 10 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 10 Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the resolution for adopting the revised assessment roll for the Western Hills Area Street Improvements, Project10-14. RESOLUTION 11-5-579 ADOPTING REVISED ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on May 9, 2011, the assessment roll for the Western Hills Area Street Improvements, City Project 10-14, was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, seventy-seven (77) property owners filed objections to their assessments according to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows: 1. Parcel 182922340063 – David Conover; 1702 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Conover is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 2. Parcel 182922340045 – Justin Balar; 1705 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Balar is requesting a revision to his assessment. 3. Parcel 182922340087 – Don Smieja; 0 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 0.33 units. Mr. Smieja is requesting an undeveloped property deferral. 4. Parcel 182922340058 – Don Smieja; 0 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 0.33 units. Mr. Smieja is requesting an undeveloped property deferral. 5. Parcel 182922340059 – Don Smieja; 0 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 0.33 units. Mr. Smieja is requesting an undeveloped property deferral. 6. Parcel 182922340064 – Don Smieja; 1706 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Smieja is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 7. Parcel 182922340065 – Maiyia Her; 1712 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mrs. Her is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 8. Parcel 182922340043 – Gerald Jahnke; 1719 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Jahnke is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen, financial hardship, or disability deferral. 9. Parcel 182922340066 – Steve M. Barsness; 1724 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Barsness is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 10. Parcel 182922410026 – Linda Bowman; 1902 Adolphus Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Bowman is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 11. Parcel 182922410027 – Johnnie and Gloria Rudolph; 1912 Adolphus Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Rudolph are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 12. Parcel 182922430015 – Nancy Tschida Stephenson; 1706 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Stephenson is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a financial hardship deferral. Packet Page Number 11 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 11 13. Parcel 182922430045 – Fred Bauer; 1741 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Bauer is requesting a revision of assessment and a senior citizen deferral. 14. Parcel 182922430043 – Kristin Ross; 1755 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Ross is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 15. Parcel 182922430038 – Brian and Rebecca Cortez; 1793 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Cortez are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 16. Parcel 182922430037 – Jeff Olson; 1799 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Olson is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 17. Parcel 182922420089 – Joy Nellessen; 1800 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mrs. Nellessen is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen deferral. 18. Parcel 182922420096 – Karen and Jose Diaz; 1805 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Diaz are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and request a financial hardship deferral. 19. Parcel 182922420085 – John W. Peterson; 1826 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Peterson is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen deferral. 20. Parcel 182922420084 – Eileen R. Eaves; 1832 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Eaves is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen deferral. 21. Parcel 182922420083 – Paula B. Merth; 1838 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Merth is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 22. Parcel 172922330028 – Daniel Underbakke; 1705 Arkwright Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Underbakke is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 23. Parcel 182922310034 – Mee and Michel Vansoua; 1845 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Vansoua are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 24. Parcel 182922310012 – Wendy and Charles Dording; 1860 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Dording are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 25. Parcel 182922310032 – Richard Willey; 1861 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Willey is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 26. Parcel 182922310011 – Coleen Hanrahan; 1866 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Hanrahan is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 27. Parcel 182922310031 – Laureen Sherman; 1867 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Sherman is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 28. Parcel 182922310030 – Todd and Laurette Alwin; 1873 Beaumont Street Packet Page Number 12 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 12 It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Alwin are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 29. Parcel 182922310008 – Jerene Grilz; 1888 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Grilz is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 30. Parcel 182922310027 – Tammi Zapata; 1895 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Zapata is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 31. Parcel 182922420047 – Dennis and Laurie Littlefield; 104 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Littlefield are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 31a. Parcel 182922420017 – Terence and Elizabeth Paulson; 107 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Staff is proposing the cancellation of assessment until such time when Jackson Street is reconstructed and this property would be assessed for the improvements to Jackson Street. 32. Parcel 182922420042 – Brenda Murphy; 142 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Murphy is requesting a financial hardship deferral. 33. Parcel 182922420040 – Mary E. Hackman; 156 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Hackman is requesting a senior citizen deferral. 34. Parcel 182922410029 – Mary and Pat McMonigal; 223 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. McMonigal are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 35. Parcel 182922430069 – Yewondwossen Tsegaw; 1733 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Tsegaw is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 36. Parcel 182922430054 – Craig and Michelle Selbitschka; 1766 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Selbitschka are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 37. Parcel 182922430055 – Christine Holman-House; 1774 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Holman-House is requesting a cancellation of assessment or a financial hardship deferral. 38. Parcel 182922430063 – Jose D. Carbajal; 1777 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Carbajal is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 39. Parcel 182922430057 – Paal Salter Carter; 1786 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Salter Carter is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a financial hardship deferral. 40. Parcel 182922430061 – Michelle Irwin; 1791 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Irwin is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 41. Parcel 182922420111 – Dick Pierre; 1803 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Pierre is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 42. Parcel 18-29-22-42-0097 – Mary Jane Hawkins; 1808 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Hawkins is requesting deferral of the assessment due to disability status and financial hardship. Packet Page Number 13 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 13 43. Parcel 182922420104 – Jamie Whitwood; 1853 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Whitwood is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 44. Parcel 182922420103 – Ann Athen; 130 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Athen is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 45. Parcel 182922420082 – Mary J. Tills; 154 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Tills is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen deferral. 46. Parcel 182922420057 – Kevin Osmundson; 171 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Osmundson is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 47. Parcel 182922420066 – Muriel Paulson; 202 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mrs. Paulson is requesting a senior citizen deferral. 48. Parcel 182922420063 – Richard J. Towle; 217 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Towle is requesting a financial hardship or senior citizen deferral. 49. Parcel 172922330016 – Kenneth J. Pfarr; 1695 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Pfarr is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 50. Parcel 172922330024 – Patrick Her; 1700 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Her is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 51. Parcel 172922330023 – Blong Yang; 1706 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Yang is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a financial hardship deferral 52. Parcel 172922330022 – Paula Vang; 1714 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Vang is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a financial hardship deferral. 53. Parcel 172922330019 – Thomas Azzone; 1723 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Azzone is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 54. Parcel 182922310014 – Richard E. Miller; 63 Fenton Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Miller is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 55. Parcel 182922310043 – Richard E. Miller; 95 Fenton Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Miller is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 56. Parcel 182922310044 – Richard E. Miller; 97 Fenton Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Miller is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 57. Parcel 182922340009 William Taylor; 1765 Gurney Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Taylor is requesting a cancellation of assessment or a disability deferral. 58. Parcel 182922340022 – Jeff Hupert; 5 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Hupert is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 59. Parcel 182922340090 – Kristin R. Borowske; 63 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Borowske is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests that the assessment be reduced and the interest rate set to zero percent. Packet Page Number 14 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 14 60. Parcel 182922340084 – Jennifer and Bradley Johnson; 76 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Johnson are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 61. Parcel 182922340014 – John and Doris Slama; 77 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Slama are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and request a senior citizen deferral. 62. Parcel 172922330058 – Katherine L. Graham; 385 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Graham is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 63. Parcel 172922330059 – Marvella M. Lackner; 395 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Lackner is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen or financial hardship deferral. 64. Parcel 182922430104 – Bezaneh Gebremedhin; 191 D Larpenteur Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Bezaneh Gebremedhin is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 65. Parcel 182922430010 – Timothy and Michelle Cover; 1740 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Cover are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 66. Parcel 182922430009 – Allan C. Button; 1744 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Button is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 67. Parcel 182922430007 – Lawrence A. Dittel; 1754 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Dittel is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 68. Parcel 182922430030 – Michael Ziolkowski; 1757 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Ziolkowski is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 69. Parcel 182922430004 – Roger J. Beran; 1770 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Beran is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 70. Parcel 182922430027 – Jack McGee; 1783 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. McGee is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 71. Parcel 182922430026 – Seth Miller; 1793 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Miller is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 72. Parcel 182922310024 – Clarence Osen; 50 Roselawn Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Osen is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a revision to his assessment due to years of residency and previous assessments and taxes paid. 73. Parcel 182922340040 – Nicola and James Opine; 1730 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Opine are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 74. Parcel 182922340024 – Todd P. Williams; 1754 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Williams is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Packet Page Number 15 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 15 75. Parcel 182922340025 – Michael and Carol Bisson; 1758 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Bisson are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 76. Parcel 182922340011 – Marvin Hodgin; 1766 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Hodgin is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. 77. Parcel 182922340010 – Christine and David Lehto; 1772 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Lehto are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and request a cancellation of the assessment or a financial hardship deferral. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: A. That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to make the following adjustments to the assessment roll for the Western Hills Area Street Improvements, Project 10-14: 1. Parcel 182922340063 – David Conover; 1702 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Conover is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 2. Parcel 182922340045 – Justin Balar; 1705 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Balar is requesting a revision to his assessment. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 3. Parcel 182922340087 – Don Smieja; 0 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 0.33 units. Mr. Smieja is requesting an undeveloped property deferral. Staff recommendation is to grant an undeveloped property deferral (15 years) upon approval of necessary paperwork. If the property remains undeveloped during the entire 15 year deferral time period the assessment will be cancelled. If at any point during the 15 year deferral period the lot is developed the assessment would become active. 4. Parcel 182922340058 – Don Smieja; 0 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 0.33 units. Mr. Smieja is requesting an undeveloped property deferral. Staff recommendation is to grant an undeveloped property deferral (15 years) upon approval of necessary paperwork. If the property remains undeveloped during the entire 15 year deferral time period the assessment will be cancelled. If at any point during the 15 year deferral period the lot is developed the assessment would become active. 5. Parcel 182922340059 – Don Smieja; 0 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 0.33 units. Mr. Smieja is requesting an undeveloped property deferral. Staff recommendation is to grant an undeveloped property deferral (15 years) upon approval of necessary paperwork. If the property remains undeveloped during the entire 15 year deferral time period the assessment will be cancelled. If at any point during the 15 year deferral period the lot is developed the assessment would become active. 6. Parcel 182922340064 – Don Smieja; 1706 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Smieja is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Packet Page Number 16 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 16 7. Parcel 182922340065 – Maiyia Her; 1712 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mrs. Her is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 8. Parcel 182922340043 – Gerald Jahnke; 1719 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Jahnke is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen, financial hardship, or disability deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 9. Parcel 182922340066 – Steve M. Barsness; 1724 Abel Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Barsness is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 10. Parcel 182922410026 – Linda Bowman; 1902 Adolphus Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Bowman is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 11. Parcel 182922410027 – Johnnie and Gloria Rudolph; 1912 Adolphus Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Rudolph are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 12. Parcel 182922430015 – Nancy Tschida Stephenson; 1706 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Stephenson is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 13. Parcel 182922430045 – Fred Bauer; 1741 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Bauer is requesting a senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 14. Parcel 182922430043 – Kristin Ross; 1755 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Ross is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Packet Page Number 17 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 17 15. Parcel 182922430038 – Brian and Rebecca Cortez; 1793 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Cortez are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 16. Parcel 182922430037 – Jeff Olson; 1799 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Olson is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 17. Parcel 182922420089 – Joy Nellessen; 1800 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mrs. Nellessen is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 18. Parcel 182922420096 – Karen and Jose Diaz; 1805 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Diaz are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and request a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 19. Parcel 182922420085 – John W. Peterson; 1826 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Peterson is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 20. Parcel 182922420084 – Eileen R. Eaves; 1832 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Eaves is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 21. Parcel 182922420083 – Paula B. Merth; 1838 Agate Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Merth is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 22. Parcel 172922330028 – Daniel Underbakke; 1705 Arkwright Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Underbakke is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being Packet Page Number 18 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 18 assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 23. Parcel 182922310034 – Mee and Michel Vansoua; 1845 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Vansoua are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 24. Parcel 182922310012 – Wendy and Charles Dording; 1860 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Dording are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 25. Parcel 182922310032 – Richard Willey; 1861 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Willey is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 26. Parcel 182922310011 – Coleen Hanrahan; 1866 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Hanrahan is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 27. Parcel 182922310031 – Laureen Sherman; 1867 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Sherman is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 28. Parcel 182922310030 – Todd and Laurette Alwin; 1873 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Alwin are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 29. Parcel 182922310008 – Jerene Grilz; 1888 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Grilz is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 30. Parcel 182922310027 – Tammi Zapata; 1895 Beaumont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Zapata is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 31. Parcel 182922420047 – Dennis and Laurie Littlefield; 104 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Littlefield are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a cancellation of assessment as this property’s Packet Page Number 19 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 19 driveway accesses from Jackson Street. At such a time when Jackson Street is reconstructed this property would be assessed for improvements. 31a. Parcel 182922420017 – Terence and Elizabeth Paulson; 107 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Staff recommendation is to grant a cancellation of assessment as this property’s driveway accesses from Jackson Street. At such a time when Jackson Street is reconstructed this property would be assessed for the improvements. 32. Parcel 182922420042 – Brenda Murphy; 142 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Murphy is requesting a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 33. Parcel 182922420040 – Mary E. Hackman; 156 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Hackman is requesting a senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 34. Parcel 182922410029 – Mary and Pat McMonigal; 223 Bellwood Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. McMonigal are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 35. Parcel 182922430069 – Yewondwossen Tsegaw; 1733 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Tsegaw is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 36. Parcel 182922430054 – Craig and Michelle Selbitschka; 1766 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Selbitschka are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 37. Parcel 182922430055 – Christine Holman-House; 1774 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Holman-House is requesting a cancellation of assessment or a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 38. Parcel 182922430063 – Jose D. Carbajal; 1777 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Carbajal is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 39. Parcel 182922430057 – Paal Salter Carter; 1786 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Salter Carter is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a Packet Page Number 20 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 20 financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 40. Parcel 182922430061 – Michelle Irwin; 1791 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Irwin is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 41. Parcel 182922420111 – Dick Pierre; 1803 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Pierre is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 42. Parcel 18-29-22-42-0097 – Mary Jane Hawkins; 1808 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Hawkins is requesting deferral of the assessment due to disability status and financial hardship. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship or disability deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 43. Parcel 182922420104 – Jamie Whitwood; 1853 City Heights Drive It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Whitwood is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 44. Parcel 182922420103 – Ann Athen; 130 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Athen is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 45. Parcel 182922420082 – Mary J. Tills; 154 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Tills is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 46. Parcel 182922420057 – Kevin Osmundson; 171 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Osmundson is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 47. Parcel 182922420066 – Muriel Paulson; 202 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mrs. Paulson is requesting a senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 48. Parcel 182922420063 – Richard J. Towle; 217 East Summer Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Towle is requesting a financial hardship or senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen or Packet Page Number 21 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 21 financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 49. Parcel 172922330016 – Kenneth J. Pfarr; 1695 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Pfarr is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 50. Parcel 172922330024 – Patrick Her; 1700 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Her is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 51. Parcel 172922330023 – Blong Yang; 1706 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Yang is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 52. Parcel 172922330022 – Paula Vang; 1714 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Vang is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 53. Parcel 172922330019 – Thomas Azzone; 1723 Edgemont Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Azzone is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 54. Parcel 182922310014 – Richard E. Miller; 63 Fenton Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Miller is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 55. Parcel 182922310043 – Richard E. Miller; 95 Fenton Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Miller is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 56. Parcel 182922310044 – Richard E. Miller; 97 Fenton Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Miller is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Packet Page Number 22 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 22 57. Parcel 182922340009 William Taylor; 1765 Gurney Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Taylor is requesting a cancellation of assessment or a disability deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a disability deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 58. Parcel 182922340022 – Jeff Hupert; 5 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Hupert is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 59. Parcel 182922340090 – Kristin R. Borowske; 63 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Borowske is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests that the assessment be reduced and the interest rate set to zero percent. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 60. Parcel 182922340084 – Jennifer and Bradley Johnson; 76 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Johnson are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 61. Parcel 182922340014 – John and Doris Slama; 77 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Slama are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and request a senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 62. Parcel 172922330058 – Katherine L. Graham; 385 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Graham is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 63. Parcel 172922330059 – Marvella M. Lackner; 395 Kingston Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Ms. Lackner is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a senior citizen or financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a senior citizen or financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. 64. Parcel 182922430104 – Bezaneh Gebremedhin; 191 D Larpenteur Avenue East It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Bezaneh Gebremedhin is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Packet Page Number 23 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 23 65. Parcel 182922430010 – Timothy and Michelle Cover; 1740 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Cover are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 66. Parcel 182922430009 – Allan C. Button; 1744 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Button is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 67. Parcel 182922430007 – Lawrence A. Dittel; 1754 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Dittel is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 68. Parcel 182922430030 – Michael Ziolkowski; 1757 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Ziolkowski is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 69. Parcel 182922430004 – Roger J. Beran; 1770 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Beran is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 70. Parcel 182922430027 – Jack McGee; 1783 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. McGee is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 71. Parcel 182922430026 – Seth Miller; 1793 Onacrest Curve It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Miller is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 72. Parcel 182922310024 – Clarence Osen; 50 Roselawn Avenue It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Osen is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and requests a revision to his assessment due to years of residency and previous assessments and taxes paid. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 73. Parcel 182922340040 – Nicola and James Opine; 1730 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Opine are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property Packet Page Number 24 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 24 is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 74. Parcel 182922340024 – Todd P. Williams; 1754 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Williams is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 75. Parcel 182922340025 – Michael and Carol Bisson; 1758 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Bisson are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 76. Parcel 182922340011 – Marvin Hodgin; 1766 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. Hodgin is objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benef it to the property. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. 77. Parcel 182922340010 – Christine and David Lehto; 1772 Sylvan Street It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit. Mr. and Mrs. Lehto are objecting to the assessment on the basis that the assessment amount is greater than benefit to the property and request a cancellation of the assessment or a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to deny the request for revision or cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the property. Staff recommendation is to grant a financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. B. The assessment roll for the Western Hills Area Street Improvements as amended, is hereby accepted, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. C. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years for residential properties and 8 years for commercial properties, the first installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2012 and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.0 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2011. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. D. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, but no later than November 15, 2011, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time after November 15, 2011, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. Packet Page Number 25 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 25 E. The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after November 15, 2011, but no later than November 16, 2011, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council on this 23rd day of May 2011. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of On-Sale Wine and 3.2% Beer Licenses for India Gate Restaurant a. City Clerk, Director Citizen Services, Karen Guilfoile gave a brief report. b. Co-Owners of India Gate Restaurant, Saiyid Noorul Husain Rizvi and Zulfiquarali Sherali Punjani addressed the council. Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the on-sale wine and 3.2% beer license for India Gate Restaurant at 27 Century Avenue North. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen. Ayes – All The motion passed. 2. Acceptance of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report – 2010 a. Assistant City Manager, Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl gave a brief report. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2010. Seconded by Councilmember Nephew. Ayes – All The motion passed. 3. Authorization to Form Living Streets Task Force a. City Engineer, Deputy Public Works Director, Michael Thompson gave the report. Councilmember Llanas moved to authorize the creation of a Living Street Task Force in order to further refine the focus of a policy and work collaboratively with stakeholders in providing more detailed feedback for the staff to move forwarded with the creation of a Maplewood Living Streets Policy. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All The motion passed. Councilmember Koppen moved to appoint Councilmember Llanas and Councilmember Juenemann to serve on the Living Street Task Force. Seconded by Councilmember Llanas. Ayes – All The motion passed. Packet Page Number 26 of 122 May 23, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes 26 K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Tim Kinley, Maplewood. Mr. Kinley discussed the topic of organized trash collection. 2. Bob Zick, North St. Paul, addressed the council. 3. Paul Pearson, Maplewood, addressed the council. L. AWARD OF BIDS None. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. N. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Support of Veterans Clinic – Mr. Antonen stated the Ramsey County Veterans Administration is considering relocating out of the Hazelwood Professional Building. The City of Maplewood would like to keep this business in Maplewood. Mr. Antonen stated he would be happy to write a letter of support for the city council regarding the city’s support of a new 10,000 square foot building potentially located behind the new Walgreen’s building at Beam and White Bear Avenue. Mr. Dan Regan with Air Lake Development addressed the council regarding this future proposal. 2. Resident Letter, Teenage Bullying – Councilmember Llanas Councilmember Llanas gave a presentation and read a letter from a Maplewood resident regarding teen bullying in the schools. 3. National Night Out – Councilmember Juenemann Councilmember Juenemann stated National Night Out is Tuesday, August 2, 2011. More information is available on the city website. O. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Rossbach adjourned the meeting at 9:44 p.m. Packet Page Number 27 of 122 Packet Page Number 28 of 122 Packet Page Number 29 of 122 Packet Page Number 30 of 122 Packet Page Number 31 of 122 Packet Page Number 32 of 122 Agenda Item F1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution of Appreciation for Girl Scout Samantha Nielsen DATE: June 8, 2011 INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY Samantha Nielson is an active member of the Minnesota and Wisconsin River Valley Girl Scouts. Samantha chose to pursue the Girl Scout Gold Award. This is a great achievement as the requirements of the Gold Award are only achieved by 5 % of all Girl Scouts. Her project was developing an immigrant garden using plants native to Sweden at a historical Swedish museum called Gammelgarden in Scandia, MN. Along with the planting of the garden, there was a large educational piece to this project. Samantha and another Girl Scout have volunteered for several summers at a children's program at Gammelgarden called "Comin to Amerika". Through this project, Samantha served as a role model for many young children at Gammelgarden. There now is a training program for younger teens that want to be helpers and leaders in the children's programs. Overall, her project required a lot of communication, leadership, teamwork, and patience. Recommended Action It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution of appreciation for Girl Scout Samantha Nielsen. Attachments 1. Resolution of Appreciation for Samantha Nielsen Packet Page Number 33 of 122 Attachment 1 City of Maplewood Resolution _____ Commendation for Samantha Nielsen June 13, 2011 Whereas, the City of Maplewood finds it to be important to recognize the achievements of its citizens, and Whereas, our youth are the future leaders of our City, State, and Nation, and Whereas, the City Council is pleased to learn that Samantha Nielsen chose to pursue the Girl Scout Gold Award, and Whereas, Samantha Nielsen is an active member of the Minnesota and Wisconsin River Valley Girl Scouts, an organization that mentors youth, and Whereas, the requirements of the Gold Award are only achieved by 5 % of all Girl Scouts, and Whereas, Samantha has completed all the requirements for the Girl Scout Gold Award, the highest award which can be achieved by a Girl Scout ,by planting an immigrant garden using plants native to Sweden at the historical Swedish Gammelgarden museum in Scandia Minnesota. Samantha further designed curriculum and taught children about the native plants and gardening. The project has taken several years to complete and a large commitment of her personal time, and Whereas, the Gold Award develops leadership, responsibility and community involvement, now therefore Be it resolved, that the Maplewood City Council does hereby commend Samantha on her accomplishments, her leadership, and her community involvement, and Be it resolved, I Mayor, Will Rossbach, as authorized by the Maplewood City Council, do extend the city’s appreciation and gratitude for the dedication and hard work put forth by Samantha and her example to other young adults and that the City of Maplewood duly record her accomplishments. _______________________________ Mayor Will Rossbach Attest: ________________________ Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk Packet Page Number 34 of 122 S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2011\AprClms 5-23-11 and 5-30-11 and 6-06-11 AGENDA NO.G-1 TO:City Council FROM:Finance Manager RE:APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: 133,214.31$ Checks # 84358 thru # 84399 dated 05/24/11 346,447.74$ Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 05/12/11 thru 05/20/11 351,384.85$ Checks # 84400 thru # 84444 dated 05/26/11 thru 05/31/11 191,766.15$ Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 05/20/11 thru 05/27/11 694,137.43$ Checks # 84445 thru # 84488 dated 06/01/11 thru 06/07/11 333,965.35$ Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 05/26/11 thru 06/03/11 2,050,915.83$ Total Accounts Payable 502,740.74$ Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 05/27/11 2,818.96$ Payroll Deduction check # 9984315 thru # 9984318 dated 05/27/11 505,559.70$ Total Payroll 2,556,475.53$ GRAND TOTAL kf attachments Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651-249-2902 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. PAYROLL AGENDA REPORT June 13, 2011 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: Packet Page Number 35 of 122 Check Description Amount 84358 01936 REIMB FOR MILEAGE & INT 4/1 - 5/15 140.61 84359 01973 CAR WASHES - APRIL 40.00 84360 03365 REIMB FOR MILEAGE & INT 1/1 - 5/17 191.11 84361 01202 PRINTING RECREATION ISSUE - APRIL 7,635.57 01202 PRINTING MAPLEWOOD MONTHLY - MAY 4,704.15 84362 01819 LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 3/16 - 4/15 1,541.83 84363 01337 911 DISPATCH SRVS - APRIL 24,088.75 84364 01409 POLICE SPACE STUDY 1,776.55 84365 01190 ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 8,806.00 01190 ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 4,510.73 01190 ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 1,855.16 01190 ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 376.37 01190 FIRE SIRENS 51.51 84366 00111 PATROL & CALLOUTS 4/25 - 5/16 2,181.00 84367 04886 VOLLEYBALL REFEREE - ASSIGNER 140.00 84368 00412 REGISTRATION FEE 875.09 84369 03619 PROJ 10-14 TELEVISING 340.00 03619 PROJ 10-14 TELEVISING 270.00 03619 PROJ 09-13 TELEVISING 170.00 03619 PROJ 10-14 TELEVISING 170.00 84370 00462 SIREN 11 REPAIR 353.87 84371 04867 PROF SRVS THRU 4-15 3,995.30 84372 00545 GASB SUBSCRIPTION 7/11 - 6/12 215.00 84373 02433 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 5/6 - 5/16 42.84 84374 03597 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 4/5 - 5/5 13.52 84375 04152 CHARITABLE GAMBLING 400.00 84376 00827 CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE 11076463 1,737.53 84377 00857 REGISTRATION FEE 350.00 84378 00896 MEMBERSHIP DUES 156.00 84379 00983 LEASE PMT 5/15 - 6/15 1,137.15 84380 00986 MONTHLY SAC - APRIL 4,415.40 84381 04881 BANQUET TABLES 8,968.00 84382 01103 RATING SERVICES 2011A BONDS 15,000.00 84383 01933 REPUBLICATION OF THE CITY CODE 5,100.00 84384 01175 MONTHLY UTILITIES 2,774.26 01175 FIBER OPTIC ACCESS CHG - APRIL 1,000.00 01175 FIBER OPTIC ACCESS CHG - MAY 1,000.00 84385 04887 PROJ 08-10 CRACK FILLING 550.00 84386 00001 REFUND K LANGER KETTLEBELLS CLASS 36.00 84387 00001 REFUND D JOHNSON FLOOR HOCKEY 35.00 84388 00001 REFUND C LANGER KETTLEBELLS CLASS 28.80 84389 04442 REIMB FOR TUITION 3/29 - 4/23 510.00 84390 01283 POLICE OFFICER LICENSES 1,440.00 84391 02001 MONTHLY JOINT POWER SRVS - MAY 625.00 84392 03344 REIMB FOR MEALS & INT 1/31-5/11 283.36 84393 01836 RECORD MGMT SOFTWARE FEE - MAY 3,798.00 01836 A/C ASPHALT 425.32 84394 01823 PICNIC TABLES FOR WAKEFIELD PARK 4,357.29 84395 03598 REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS 3/14-4/29 1,511.35 84396 04885 SUBMARINE STATION ENGINEERING 9,500.00 84397 01669 TOW M3 149.63 84398 04501 SPRING CLEAN UP E-WASTE RECYCLING 3,241.26 84399 03378 REIMB FOR SAFETY BOOTS 5/9 200.0005/24/2011 MATT WOEHRLE 133,214.3142Checks in this report. 05/24/2011 THEMESCAPES, INC. 05/24/2011 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & 05/24/2011 UNIVERSAL RECYCLING TECH, LLC 05/24/2011 CITY OF ST PAUL 05/24/2011 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 05/24/2011 PAUL THEISEN 05/24/2011 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 05/24/2011 WILL ROSSBACH 05/24/2011 CITY OF ST PAUL 05/24/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 05/24/2011 ANDREA PLACE 05/24/2011 POST BOARD 05/24/2011 NUGENT SEALCOATING INC. 05/24/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 05/24/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 05/24/2011 CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL 05/24/2011 CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL 05/24/2011 CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL 05/24/2011 MITY-LITE, INC. 05/24/2011 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE 05/24/2011 MUNICIPAL CODE CORP 05/24/2011 M C M A 05/24/2011 METRO SALES INC 05/24/2011 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 05/24/2011 ISD 622 COMMUNITY EDUCATION 05/24/2011 L M C I T 05/24/2011 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 05/24/2011 GFOA 05/24/2011 JEAN GLASS 05/24/2011 MARY JO HOFMEISTER 05/24/2011 DRAIN KING INC 05/24/2011 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC. 05/24/2011 FOTH INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIR 05/24/2011 DRAIN KING INC 05/24/2011 DRAIN KING INC 05/24/2011 DRAIN KING INC 05/24/2011 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 05/24/2011 KAREN MARIE BOWMAN 05/24/2011 DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES 05/24/2011 XCEL ENERGY 05/24/2011 XCEL ENERGY 05/24/2011 XCEL ENERGY 05/24/2011 S.E.H. 05/24/2011 XCEL ENERGY 05/24/2011 XCEL ENERGY 05/24/2011 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC 05/24/2011 PAETEC 05/24/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV 05/24/2011 ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS INC 05/24/2011 NICK FRANZEN 05/24/2011 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC Check Register City of Maplewood 05/20/2011 Date Vendor 05/24/2011 CHAD BERGO Packet Page Number 36 of 122 Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description Amount 5/12/2011 5/16/2011 ICMA (Vantagepointe)Retiree Health Savings 18,751.23 5/12/2011 5/16/2011 ING - State Plan Deferred Compensation 27,230.00 5/12/2011 5/16/2011 P.E.R.A.P.E.R.A.85,377.78 5/12/2011 5/16/2011 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 95,396.44 5/13/2011 5/16/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 14,142.51 5/13/2011 5/16/2011 VANCO Billing fee 92.25 5/12/2011 5/17/2011 Labor Unions Union Dues 1,843.00 5/12/2011 5/17/2011 MidAmerica - ING HRA Flex plan 13,431.20 5/12/2011 5/17/2011 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 21,118.60 5/16/2011 5/17/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 13,062.00 5/17/2011 5/18/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 16,040.53 5/18/2011 5/19/2011 MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax 7,881.00 5/18/2011 5/19/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 12,278.75 5/12/2011 5/20/2011 Optum Health DCRP & Flex plan payments 5,350.34 5/19/2011 5/20/2011 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 2,236.00 5/19/2011 5/20/2011 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax 283.80 5/19/2011 5/20/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 11,932.31 TOTAL 346,447.74 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Packet Page Number 37 of 122 CHECK #CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME 05/27/11 CROTTY, KERRY 3,575.20 05/27/11 BUSACK, DANIEL 3,313.05 05/27/11 COFFEY, KEVIN 2,961.11 05/27/11 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 3,419.78 05/27/11 BOHL, JOHN 3,328.47 05/27/11 BELDE, STANLEY 3,063.23 05/27/11 BENJAMIN, MARKESE 2,811.46 05/27/11 BAKKE, LONN 2,003.97 05/27/11 BARTZ, PAUL 3,500.67 05/27/11 ABEL, CLINT 3,001.43 05/27/11 ALDRIDGE, MARK 3,690.27 05/27/11 THOMALLA, DAVID 4,936.26 05/27/11 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,882.15 05/27/11 POWELL, PHILIP 2,903.66 05/27/11 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 2,081.79 05/27/11 KVAM, DAVID 4,188.29 05/27/11 PALANK, MARY 1,886.77 05/27/11 WEAVER, KRISTINE 2,288.55 05/27/11 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,882.16 05/27/11 RICHTER, CHARLENE 903.24 05/27/11 SCHOENECKER, LEIGH 1,166.62 05/27/11 MOY, PAMELA 1,107.70 05/27/11 OSTER, ANDREA 1,886.77 05/27/11 LARSON, MICHELLE 1,758.15 05/27/11 MECHELKE, SHERRIE 1,107.69 05/27/11 SPANGLER, EDNA 1,086.09 05/27/11 CORTESI, LUANNE 1,042.20 05/27/11 NEPHEW, MICHELLE 1,610.35 05/27/11 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 2,618.72 05/27/11 GUILFOILE, KAREN 4,176.43 05/27/11 KROLL, LISA 1,627.96 05/27/11 RUEB, JOSEPH 2,493.80 05/27/11 CAREY, HEIDI 2,005.19 05/27/11 JACKSON, MARY 2,153.98 05/27/11 KELSEY, CONNIE 2,569.23 05/27/11 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,348.53 05/27/11 DEBILZAN, JUDY 1,234.18 05/27/11 BAUMAN, GAYLE 3,985.21 05/27/11 FORMANEK, KAREN 1,680.30 05/27/11 HENNING, KARISSA 92.30 05/27/11 RAMEAUX, THERESE 3,030.67 05/27/11 FARR, LARRY 2,885.65 05/27/11 JAHN, DAVID 1,840.37 05/27/11 KANTRUD, HUGH 184.62 05/27/11 CHRISTENSON, SCOTT 1,962.49 05/27/11 ANTONEN, JAMES 5,300.00 05/27/11 BURLINGAME, SARAH 1,954.41 05/27/11 STRAUTMANIS, MARIS 176.00 05/27/11 AHL, R. CHARLES 4,958.72 05/27/11 NEPHEW, JOHN 416.42 05/27/11 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 473.15 05/27/11 KOPPEN, MARVIN 416.42 05/27/11 LLANAS, JAMES 416.42 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD AMOUNT 05/27/11 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 416.42 Packet Page Number 38 of 122 05/27/11 JUNGMANN, BERNARD 360.00 05/27/11 JOHNSON, JAMES 695.50 05/27/11 JONES, JONATHAN 294.00 05/27/11 HENDRICKSON, NICHOLAS 2,285.26 05/27/11 HUTCHINSON, JAMES 161.00 05/27/11 HALWEG, JODI 2,769.31 05/27/11 HEFFERNAN, PATRICK 308.00 05/27/11 FASULO, WALTER 712.50 05/27/11 FOSSUM, ANDREW 2,776.97 05/27/11 DIERICH, REBECCA 246.00 05/27/11 EVERSON, PAUL 3,150.67 05/27/11 CRUMMY, CHARLES 396.00 05/27/11 DAWSON, RICHARD 3,045.70 05/27/11 CAPISTRANT, JOHN 492.00 05/27/11 CRAWFORD, RAYMOND 576.00 05/27/11 BRESIN, ROBERT 222.00 05/27/11 CAPISTRANT, JACOB 594.00 05/27/11 BOURQUIN, RON 304.00 05/27/11 BRADBURY, RYAN 198.00 05/27/11 BASSETT, BRENT 462.00 05/27/11 BAUMAN, ANDREW 2,676.26 05/27/11 ARKSEY, CHARLES 324.00 05/27/11 BAHL, DAVID 378.00 05/27/11 XIONG, KAO 2,842.94 05/27/11 ACOSTA, MARK 288.00 05/27/11 TRAN, JOSEPH 2,031.75 05/27/11 WENZEL, JAY 3,000.26 05/27/11 THEISEN, PAUL 3,278.48 05/27/11 THIENES, PAUL 3,511.99 05/27/11 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2,954.18 05/27/11 TAUZELL, BRIAN 2,423.48 05/27/11 STEINER, JOSEPH 2,887.72 05/27/11 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 2,785.00 05/27/11 RHUDE, MATTHEW 2,900.73 05/27/11 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 4,060.51 05/27/11 PARKER, JAMES 1,912.51 05/27/11 REZNY, BRADLEY 3,002.57 05/27/11 NYE, MICHAEL 3,240.82 05/27/11 OLSON, JULIE 2,869.16 05/27/11 MCCARTY, GLEN 3,103.15 05/27/11 METRY, ALESIA 3,183.80 05/27/11 MARINO, JASON 3,052.70 05/27/11 MARTIN, JERROLD 3,001.43 05/27/11 LU, JOHNNIE 2,987.33 05/27/11 LYNCH, KATHERINE 1,895.18 05/27/11 LANGNER, SCOTT 3,293.35 05/27/11 LANGNER, TODD 2,785.00 05/27/11 KREKELER, NICHOLAS 1,006.88 05/27/11 KROLL, BRETT 2,882.45 05/27/11 KALKA, THOMAS 906.36 05/27/11 KONG, TOMMY 2,947.82 05/27/11 HIEBERT, STEVEN 3,499.43 05/27/11 JOHNSON, KEVIN 6,187.47 05/27/11 HAWKINSON JR, TIMOTHY 2,785.00 05/27/11 HER, PHENG 2,512.64 05/27/11 FRITZE, DEREK 2,687.63 05/27/11 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 3,401.32 05/27/11 FORSYTHE, MARCUS 2,146.62 05/27/11 FRASER, JOHN 3,194.74 05/27/11 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 3,184.73 05/27/11 FLOR, TIMOTHY 2,826.13 05/27/11 DOBLAR, RICHARD 3,737.66 05/27/11 DUGAS, MICHAEL 3,462.04 05/27/11 DEMULLING, JOSEPH 2,687.63 Packet Page Number 39 of 122 05/27/11 GUNDERSON, ANDREW 1,040.00 05/27/11 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 4,390.46 05/27/11 EDSON, DAVID 2,170.59 05/27/11 THOMPSON, MICHAEL 4,028.24 05/27/11 ZIEMAN, SCOTT 383.40 05/27/11 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,788.88 05/27/11 LOVE, STEVEN 3,281.22 05/27/11 KREGER, JASON 2,627.66 05/27/11 KUMMER, STEVEN 3,200.74 05/27/11 JACOBSON, SCOTT 2,413.62 05/27/11 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 2,857.11 05/27/11 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,647.40 05/27/11 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 2,459.76 05/27/11 TEVLIN, TODD 2,125.35 05/27/11 BURLINGAME, NATHAN 2,006.40 05/27/11 RUNNING, ROBERT 2,333.35 05/27/11 SETNES, SAMUEL 560.00 05/27/11 NAGEL, BRYAN 3,408.40 05/27/11 OSWALD, ERICK 2,359.97 05/27/11 JONES, DONALD 2,125.35 05/27/11 MEISSNER, BRENT 1,840.55 05/27/11 EDGE, DOUGLAS 2,112.20 05/27/11 HAMRE, MILES 1,417.50 05/27/11 BUCKLEY, BRENT 2,090.91 05/27/11 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 2,125.35 05/27/11 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,713.17 05/27/11 BRINK, TROY 2,678.43 05/27/11 KNUTSON, LOIS 1,996.55 05/27/11 NIVEN, AMY 1,411.62 05/27/11 LUKIN, STEVEN 4,475.33 05/27/11 ZWIEG, SUSAN 2,234.16 05/27/11 WHITE, JOEL 138.00 05/27/11 GERVAIS-JR, CLARENCE 3,867.86 05/27/11 STREFF, MICHAEL 2,592.34 05/27/11 SVENDSEN, RONALD 3,123.84 05/27/11 SCHULTZ, JEROME 168.00 05/27/11 SEDLACEK, JEFFREY 2,924.76 05/27/11 RICE, CHRISTOPHER 696.00 05/27/11 RODRIGUEZ, ROBERTO 360.00 05/27/11 RAVENWALD, CORINNE 378.00 05/27/11 REYNOSO, ANGEL 126.00 05/27/11 POWERS, KENNETH 408.00 05/27/11 RAINEY, JAMES 564.00 05/27/11 PETERSON, ROBERT 2,907.37 05/27/11 PLACE, ANDREA 2,771.53 05/27/11 PACHECO, ALPHONSE 102.00 05/27/11 PETERSON, MARK 448.00 05/27/11 OLSON, JAMES 2,776.97 05/27/11 OPHEIM, JOHN 602.00 05/27/11 NOVAK, JEROME 2,933.40 05/27/11 NOWICKI, PAUL 333.00 05/27/11 MORGAN, JEFFERY 344.50 05/27/11 NIELSEN, KENNETH 324.00 05/27/11 MONDOR, MICHAEL 2,999.20 05/27/11 MONSON, PETER 252.00 05/27/11 MELLEN, CHRISTOPHER 234.00 05/27/11 MILLER, NICHOLAS 360.00 05/27/11 LINDER, TIMOTHY 2,615.94 05/27/11 LOCHEN, MICHAEL 704.00 05/27/11 KONDER, RONALD 405.00 05/27/11 KUBAT, ERIC 2,189.88 05/27/11 KARRAS, JAMIE 402.00 05/27/11 KERSKA, JOSEPH 426.00 05/27/11 KANE, ROBERT 595.00 Packet Page Number 40 of 122 05/27/11 BUCKLEY, BRITTANY 273.00 05/27/11 BRUSOE, AMY 91.95 05/27/11 BRUSOE, CRISTINA 45.20 05/27/11 BAUDE, SARAH 36.50 05/27/11 BEITLER, JULIE 74.20 05/27/11 ANDERSON, JUSTIN 255.20 05/27/11 ANDERSON, MAXWELL 262.20 05/27/11 ANDERSON, ALYSSA 19.38 05/27/11 ANDERSON, JOSHUA 42.30 05/27/11 VANG, KAY 223.88 05/27/11 VUE, LOR PAO 204.00 05/27/11 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 568.12 05/27/11 STARK, SUE 231.25 05/27/11 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 620.37 05/27/11 PENN, CHRISTINE 2,199.26 05/27/11 KULHANEK-DIONNE, ANN 496.13 05/27/11 OLSON, SANDRA 56.00 05/27/11 HOFMEISTER, MARY 1,047.43 05/27/11 HOFMEISTER, TIMOTHY 423.63 05/27/11 HANSEN, LORI 3,057.86 05/27/11 HER, PETER 415.95 05/27/11 EVANS, CHRISTINE 1,375.60 05/27/11 GLASS, JEAN 2,103.68 05/27/11 BRENEMAN, NEIL 1,527.70 05/27/11 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 749.20 05/27/11 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 2,914.49 05/27/11 ANZALDI, MANDY 1,313.29 05/27/11 HAAG, MARK 2,288.55 05/27/11 KLOOZ, AUSTIN 920.00 05/27/11 ADAMS, DAVID 1,733.80 05/27/11 GERMAIN, DAVID 2,134.60 05/27/11 TAYLOR, JAMES 2,466.23 05/27/11 THOMFORDE, FAITH 1,533.00 05/27/11 ROBBINS, CAMDEN 58.13 05/27/11 SCHALLER, SCOTT 220.38 05/27/11 JANASZAK, MEGHAN 682.44 05/27/11 ROBBINS, AUDRA 2,847.74 05/27/11 BERGER, STEPHANIE 239.88 05/27/11 BJORK, BRANDON 200.75 05/27/11 WELLENS, MOLLY 1,628.03 05/27/11 ALLEN, KATELYN 280.00 05/27/11 FISHER, DAVID 3,778.99 05/27/11 SWAN, DAVID 2,738.95 05/27/11 BRASH, JASON 2,259.75 05/27/11 CARVER, NICHOLAS 3,211.95 05/27/11 FINWALL, SHANN 3,202.15 05/27/11 MARTIN, MICHAEL 2,606.15 05/27/11 THOMPSON, DEBRA 752.86 05/27/11 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 3,800.52 05/27/11 OLSON, ERICA 1,181.75 05/27/11 SINDT, ANDREA 2,013.81 05/27/11 WACHAL, KAREN 854.68 05/27/11 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 3,211.95 05/27/11 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,622.79 05/27/11 SOUTTER, CHRISTINE 338.64 05/27/11 GERNES, CAROLE 393.76 05/27/11 HAYMAN, JANET 1,436.73 05/27/11 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1,407.77 05/27/11 DEAVER, CHARLES 592.74 05/27/11 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 2,127.66 05/27/11 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 2,129.97 05/27/11 MARUSKA, MARK 3,183.11 05/27/11 NAUGHTON, JOHN 2,125.35 05/27/11 HINNENKAMP, GARY 2,142.79 Packet Page Number 41 of 122 05/27/11 REILLY, MICHAEL 1,915.75 05/27/11 MALONEY, SHAUNA 116.25 05/27/11 PRINS, KELLY 1,255.62 05/27/11 JOHNSON, JUSTIN 210.00 05/27/11 LONETTI, JAMES 480.00 05/27/11 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,320.90 05/27/11 FULFORD, ZAHKIYA 123.25 05/27/11 BEHAN, JAMES 1,918.06 05/27/11 COLEMAN, PATRICK 230.63 05/27/11 LANGER, KAYLYN 38.00 05/27/11 ZAGER, LINNEA 389.00 05/27/11 DANIEL, BREANNA 125.50 05/27/11 GIERNET, ASHLEY 19.00 05/27/11 WOLFGRAM, TERESA 150.00 05/27/11 BOSLEY, CAROL 224.00 05/27/11 WEDES, CARYL 99.00 05/27/11 WEEVER, NAOMI 97.88 05/27/11 TUPY, MARCUS 285.00 05/27/11 WARNER, CAROLYN 316.80 05/27/11 TRUE, ANDREW 91.01 05/27/11 TUPY, HEIDE 91.60 05/27/11 TAYLOR, JASON 26.25 05/27/11 TREPANIER, TODD 462.00 05/27/11 SMITH, ANN 101.50 05/27/11 SMITLEY, SHARON 284.90 05/27/11 SCHUNEMAN, GREGORY 77.25 05/27/11 SJERVEN, BRENDA 54.00 05/27/11 SCHREINER, MARK 74.40 05/27/11 SCHREINER, MICHELLE 265.20 05/27/11 RONNING, ZACCEUS 21.90 05/27/11 SCHREIER, ROSEMARIE 74.00 05/27/11 RICHTER, DANIEL 75.60 05/27/11 RONNING, ISAIAH 82.60 05/27/11 PROESCH, ANDY 612.57 05/27/11 RENFORD, NICHOLAS 72.50 05/27/11 NADEAU, KELLY 128.05 05/27/11 PEHOSKI, JOEL 104.00 05/27/11 MCCORMACK, MELISSA 77.18 05/27/11 METCALF, JOLENE 84.50 05/27/11 LAMSON, ELIANA 72.00 05/27/11 MCCANN, NATALIE 76.00 05/27/11 KOLLER, NINA 183.00 05/27/11 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 865.81 05/27/11 JOYER, JENNA 8.10 05/27/11 KOHLER, ROCHELLE 72.00 05/27/11 JOHNSON, BARBARA 136.95 05/27/11 JOYER, ANTHONY 74.00 05/27/11 HOLMBERG, LADONNA 788.00 05/27/11 HORWATH, RONALD 2,589.01 05/27/11 HANSEN, HANNAH 22.65 05/27/11 HEINRICH, SHEILA 395.00 05/27/11 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 381.00 05/27/11 HAGSTROM, EMILY 80.40 05/27/11 GIPPLE, TRISHA 145.51 05/27/11 GRAY, MEGAN 91.27 05/27/11 ERICKSON-CLARK, CAROL 49.00 05/27/11 FONTAINE, KIM 387.00 05/27/11 DUNN, RYAN 1,090.20 05/27/11 EKSTRAND, DANIEL 65.23 05/27/11 CRANDALL, KRISTA 131.92 05/27/11 DEMPSEY, BETH 232.50 05/27/11 CAMPBELL, JESSICA 1,546.87 05/27/11 CLARK, PAMELA 38.60 05/27/11 BUTLER, ANGELA 34.00 Packet Page Number 42 of 122 9984297 9984298 9984299 9984300 9984301 9984302 9984303 9984304 9984305 9984306 9984307 9984308 9984309 9984310 9984311 9984312 9984313 9984314 05/27/11 STEFFEN, MICHAEL 76.13 502,740.74 05/27/11 WEINHAGEN, SHELBY 188.03 05/27/11 PENN, CAYLA 184.50 05/27/11 NORTHOUSE, KATHERINE 58.13 05/27/11 ROSTRON, ROBERT 463.90 05/27/11 MCLAURIN, CHRISTOPHER 263.30 05/27/11 MCMAHON, MICHAEL 18.38 05/27/11 VUKICH, CANDACE 36.25 05/27/11 FLUEGEL, LARISSA 41.53 05/27/11 GEBHARD, MADELINE 440.00 05/27/11 MUELLNER, CHADD 270.00 05/27/11 NAUGHTON, TYLER 880.00 05/27/11 BETHEL III, CHARLES 110.50 05/27/11 MELLEN, RICHARD 312.00 05/27/11 WYSE, ROBERT 312.00 05/27/11 HALE, JOSEPH 147.00 05/27/11 HERLUND, RICK 150.00 05/27/11 FRANZEN, NICHOLAS 2,509.90 05/27/11 ANDERSON, BRIAN 318.00 05/27/11 BERGO, CHAD 2,651.63 05/27/11 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 3,469.86 05/27/11 PRIEM, STEVEN 2,390.15 05/27/11 WOEHRLE, MATTHEW 2,461.01 05/27/11 XIONG, NAO 130.50 05/27/11 AICHELE, CRAIG 2,204.87 05/27/11 THOMPSON, BENJAMIN 305.06 05/27/11 VANG, PETER 119.63 05/27/11 SCHULZE, KEVIN 564.00 Packet Page Number 43 of 122 Transaction Date Posting Date Merchant Name Transaction Amount Name 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $37.78 CLINT ABEL 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $61.98 CLINT ABEL 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 STREICHERS INC $103.99 CLINT ABEL 05/13/2011 05/17/2011 GRAND VIEW LODGE & TENNIS $172.79 R CHARLES AHL 05/06/2011 05/10/2011 GRAND VIEW LODGE & TENNIS $239.61 JAMES ANTONEN 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $22.61 MANDY ANZALDI 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 JOANN ETC #1970 $21.01 MANDY ANZALDI 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 WAL-MART $32.62 MANDY ANZALDI 05/07/2011 05/09/2011 MAPLEWOOD PARKS AND RECRE $30.50 MANDY ANZALDI 05/09/2011 05/10/2011 TARGET 00011858 $49.20 MANDY ANZALDI 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 TCT*M&N INTERNATIONAL $50.48 MANDY ANZALDI 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 TARGET 00011858 $52.51 MANDY ANZALDI 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 TARGET 00011858 $5.31 MANDY ANZALDI 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$2.19 MANDY ANZALDI 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 HEJNY RENTAL INC $38.57 LONN BAKKE 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$72.71 LONN BAKKE 05/09/2011 05/10/2011 AQUA LOGICS INC ($15.51)JIM BEHAN 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC $150.46 JIM BEHAN 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 NUCO2 01 OF 01 $61.32 JIM BEHAN 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 NUCO2 01 OF 01 $48.87 JIM BEHAN 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 NUCO2 01 OF 01 $64.67 JIM BEHAN 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 NUCO2 01 OF 01 $66.80 JIM BEHAN 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING $244.69 JIM BEHAN 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 STATE SUPPLY $408.70 JIM BEHAN 05/14/2011 05/16/2011 LIFE FITNESS $172.02 JIM BEHAN 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 STATE SUPPLY $1,039.27 JIM BEHAN 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 STATE SUPPLY $50.41 JIM BEHAN 05/20/2011 05/20/2011 STATE SUPPLY $1,008.18 JIM BEHAN 05/17/2011 05/19/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $77.78 MARKESE BENJAMIN 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 USPS 26833800033400730 $13.20 OAKLEY BIESANZ 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 PETSMART INC 461 ($16.06)OAKLEY BIESANZ 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 PETSMART INC 461 $23.55 OAKLEY BIESANZ 05/14/2011 05/16/2011 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIP-MN $70.68 RON BOURQUIN 05/14/2011 05/16/2011 MENARDS 3022 $12.46 RON BOURQUIN 05/09/2011 05/10/2011 PANERA BREAD #1305 $109.45 SARAH BURLINGAME 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 USPS POSTAL ST66100207 $9.80 SARAH BURLINGAME 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 WALGREENS.COM #5995 $5.73 SARAH BURLINGAME 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 STREICHERS INC $344.14 DAN BUSACK 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $154.42 DANIEL BUSACK 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 VZWRLSS*APOCC VISN $85.05 HEIDI CAREY 05/16/2011 05/17/2011 BANNERS.COM $206.49 HEIDI CAREY 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 STATE SUPPLY $72.97 SCOTT CHRISTENSON 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 STATE SUPPLY $168.63 SCOTT CHRISTENSON 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 VIKING ELEC-CREDIT DEPT.$42.58 SCOTT CHRISTENSON 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 WOODBURY BP $8.76 CHARLES DEAVER 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC $69.63 CHARLES DEAVER 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 FRATTALLONES WOODBURY AC $7.49 CHARLES DEAVER 05/14/2011 05/16/2011 MENARDS 3022 $7.41 CHARLES DEAVER 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $141.89 MICHAEL DUGAS 05/09/2011 05/11/2011 GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMENT $22.44 DOUG EDGE 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE ($19.27)DAVE EDSON 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $40.21 DAVE EDSON 05/12/2011 05/16/2011 MILLS FLEET FARM #2,700 $169.13 DAVE EDSON 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $28.37 DAVE EDSON 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 MENARDS 3059 $43.67 DAVE EDSON 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 SAFETY DEPOT $91.28 ANDREW ENGSTROM 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $100.18 PAUL E EVERSON Packet Page Number 44 of 122 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2810 $66.36 LARRY FARR 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS C $725.00 LARRY FARR 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 FLUID INTERIORS $275.36 LARRY FARR 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERI $109.53 LARRY FARR 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE SERV $2,234.33 LARRY FARR 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 MUSKA ELECTRIC CO $315.39 LARRY FARR 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 ($33.13)LARRY FARR 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES $1,969.70 LARRY FARR 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 CINTAS #470 $79.64 LARRY FARR 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $91.45 LARRY FARR 05/16/2011 05/17/2011 MENARDS 3114 $11.23 LARRY FARR 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 CINTAS #470 $38.50 LARRY FARR 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 CINTAS #470 $40.21 LARRY FARR 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES $98.26 LARRY FARR 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 DLX FOR BUSINESS $73.12 KAREN FORMANEK 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 PITNEYBOWES ONLINEBILL $887.00 KAREN FORMANEK 05/12/2011 05/12/2011 PAY FLOW PRO $78.45 MYCHAL FOWLDS 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 CRABTREE COMPANIES INC $4,990.69 MYCHAL FOWLDS 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 ASSET RECOVERY $63.18 MYCHAL FOWLDS 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 QWESTCOMM*TN651 $75.95 MYCHAL FOWLDS 05/16/2011 05/17/2011 CABLING SERVICES CORPORA $419.55 MYCHAL FOWLDS 05/16/2011 05/17/2011 IDEACOM MID-AMERICA, INC.$415.50 MYCHAL FOWLDS 05/17/2011 05/19/2011 IMAGING PATH $3,964.99 MYCHAL FOWLDS 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 METRO SALES INC $1,447.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 CUSTOMER SUPT CENTER $898.82 MYCHAL FOWLDS 05/09/2011 05/10/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT $304.91 NICK FRANZEN 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT $54.21 NICK FRANZEN 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT $1,536.85 NICK FRANZEN 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 SYM*SECURE SITE SSL $1,118.00 NICK FRANZEN 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT $115.20 NICK FRANZEN 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT $366.51 NICK FRANZEN 05/16/2011 05/18/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $117.03 JOHN FRASER 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 OFFICE MAX $25.70 CAROLE GERNES 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$13.77 CLARENCE GERVAIS 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 MENARDS 3059 $40.04 CLARENCE GERVAIS 05/12/2011 05/16/2011 CODE 2 $42.09 CLARENCE GERVAIS 05/09/2011 05/11/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $22.53 JEAN GLASS 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 MICHAELS #2744 $23.01 JEAN GLASS 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 LINDERS GREENHOUSE $83.35 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 05/14/2011 05/16/2011 VZWRLSS*APOCC VISN $97.04 KAREN E GUILFOILE 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $221.11 KAREN E GUILFOILE 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $9.45 KAREN E GUILFOILE 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 AMAZON.COM $28.38 KAREN E GUILFOILE 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $43.88 MILES HAMRE 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 DEGE GARDEN CENTER $7.49 MILES HAMRE 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $10.69 PHENG HER 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $16.06 GARY HINNENKAMP 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 VITAMIN WORLD 9109 $70.68 RON HORWATH 05/09/2011 05/11/2011 SEPTIC CHECK INC.$321.69 ANN E HUTCHINSON 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 SHELL OIL 57444610000 $26.40 TOM KALKA 05/11/2011 05/13/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $200.00 TOMMY KONG 05/03/2011 05/10/2011 MILLS FLEET FARM #2,700 ($16.07)NICHOLAS KREKELER 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE $1,154.40 LISA KROLL 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 SCRANTON GILLETTE COMM $231.00 LISA KROLL 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $122.90 LISA KROLL 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $63.36 DAVID KVAM 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 CLASSIC COLLISION CTR $1,766.60 DAVID KVAM 05/09/2011 05/11/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $51.21 DAVID KVAM Packet Page Number 45 of 122 05/10/2011 05/13/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED $401.79 DAVID KVAM 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 THOMSON WEST*TCD $533.62 DAVID KVAM 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC $5.34 DAVID KVAM 05/14/2011 05/16/2011 COMCAST CABLE COMM $34.00 DAVID KVAM 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 HEALTHEAST TRANSPORTATN $2,943.83 DAVID KVAM 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 IMPRK LOT 0020-0091 $9.00 STEVE LOVE 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 OVERHEAD DOOR COMP $296.45 STEVE LUKIN 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT $356.70 STEVE LUKIN 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$164.80 STEVE LUKIN 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$1,580.00 STEVE LUKIN 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT $2,147.86 STEVE LUKIN 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 METRO FIRE $381.92 STEVE LUKIN 05/17/2011 05/19/2011 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL $144.65 STEVE LUKIN 05/17/2011 05/19/2011 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL $122.00 STEVE LUKIN 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$44.95 STEVE LUKIN 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$110.55 STEVE LUKIN 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 ASPEN MILLS INC.$112.40 STEVE LUKIN 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 STREICHERS INC $103.99 JASON MARINO 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 STREICHERS INC $7.99 JASON MARINO 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 UNITED RENTALS $266.72 MARK MARUSKA 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION $184.00 MARK MARUSKA 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $44.97 MARK MARUSKA 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $115.87 MARK MARUSKA 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 UNITED RENTALS $35.76 MARK MARUSKA 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER $209.62 MARK MARUSKA 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 VALLEY CREEK EXPRESS INC $2,304.00 MARK MARUSKA 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 VALLEY CREEK EXPRESS INC $1,044.00 MARK MARUSKA 05/09/2011 05/11/2011 CINTAS FIRST AID #431 $93.40 BRYAN NAGEL 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 PAKOR INC $217.59 SHELLY NEPHEW 05/11/2011 05/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $68.24 AMY NIVEN 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 BATTERIES PLUS #31 $141.34 MICHAEL NYE 05/11/2011 05/13/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $52.13 MARY KAY PALANK 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $22.22 MARY KAY PALANK 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 DOLRTREE 4375 00043752 $27.85 CHRISTINE PENN 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 BROADWAY RENTAL $816.39 CHRISTINE PENN 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 FEDEX OFFICE #0617 $70.87 CHRISTINE PENN 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 JOANN ETC #1970 $6.43 CHRISTINE PENN 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 DOLRTREE 3150 00031500 $27.85 CHRISTINE PENN 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 TARGET 00011858 $43.69 CHRISTINE PENN 05/12/2011 05/16/2011 MIDWAY PARTY RENTAL $378.06 CHRISTINE PENN 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 TRUCK UTILITIES $7.23 ROBERT PETERSON 05/16/2011 05/18/2011 BECKER FIRE AND SAFETY SV $158.94 ROBERT PETERSON 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 BATTERIES PLUS #31 $39.68 PHILIP F POWELL 05/09/2011 05/10/2011 STERLING TEK INC $63.96 PHILIP F POWELL 05/10/2011 05/10/2011 ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES $70.22 PHILIP F POWELL 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS $39.99 PHILIP F POWELL 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $19.04 PHILIP F POWELL 05/17/2011 05/17/2011 ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES $269.96 PHILIP F POWELL 05/07/2011 05/09/2011 NORSEMAN ENVIRONMENTAL SA $513.40 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 05/09/2011 05/11/2011 CINTAS FIRST AID #431 $88.19 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 05/11/2011 05/13/2011 THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRCULAT $260.00 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 05/05/2011 05/10/2011 ZIEGLER INC - RETAIL ($463.15)STEVEN PRIEM 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $80.77 STEVEN PRIEM 05/09/2011 05/10/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $45.98 STEVEN PRIEM 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $78.77 STEVEN PRIEM 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $139.94 STEVEN PRIEM 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $7.07 STEVEN PRIEM 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 POMPS TIRE SERVICE, INC $830.52 STEVEN PRIEM Packet Page Number 46 of 122 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $102.82 STEVEN PRIEM 05/11/2011 05/13/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $278.53 STEVEN PRIEM 05/12/2011 05/16/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $32.14 STEVEN PRIEM 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 TOUSLEY FORD I27228006 $338.45 STEVEN PRIEM 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 GOODYEAR AUTO SRV CT 6920 $70.16 STEVEN PRIEM 05/16/2011 05/17/2011 POLAR CHEVROLET MAZDA PAR $31.46 STEVEN PRIEM 05/16/2011 05/17/2011 POLAR CHEVROLET MAZDA PAR $13.91 STEVEN PRIEM 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19 $10.20 STEVEN PRIEM 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 POLAR CHEVROLET MAZDA PAR $26.29 STEVEN PRIEM 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 AMERICAN FASTENER AND SUP $36.12 STEVEN PRIEM 05/17/2011 05/18/2011 BAUER BUILT TIRE 18 $1,493.91 STEVEN PRIEM 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $50.26 STEVEN PRIEM 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL $45.72 STEVEN PRIEM 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 OREILLY AUTO 00020743 $38.18 STEVEN PRIEM 05/09/2011 05/11/2011 PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISING $1,900.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INC $2,169.28 TERRIE RAMEAUX 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 MN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH $729.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS $1,018.54 MICHAEL REILLY 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $602.08 MICHAEL REILLY 05/07/2011 05/09/2011 SUN RAY LANES INC $350.14 AUDRA ROBBINS 05/07/2011 05/09/2011 CUB FOODS, INC.$16.76 AUDRA ROBBINS 05/09/2011 05/10/2011 METRO FIRE $176.69 ROBERT RUNNING 05/09/2011 05/10/2011 MENARDS 3059 $28.06 ROBERT RUNNING 05/12/2011 05/16/2011 TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC.$208.41 ROBERT RUNNING 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $163.33 ROBERT RUNNING 05/19/2011 05/20/2011 MOGREN TURF LLP $88.38 ROBERT RUNNING 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 T-MOBILE.COM*PAYMENT $38.20 DEB SCHMIDT 05/08/2011 05/10/2011 GAYLORD OPRYLAND RESTRNT $17.40 DEB SCHMIDT 05/08/2011 05/10/2011 GAYLORD OPRYLAND RESTRNT $22.37 DEB SCHMIDT 05/09/2011 05/11/2011 GAYLORD OPRYLAND RESTRNT $33.00 DEB SCHMIDT 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 RUDY'S MUSIC CITY BAR $35.04 DEB SCHMIDT 05/11/2011 05/13/2011 GAYLORD OPRYLAND RESTRNT $11.96 DEB SCHMIDT 05/12/2011 05/16/2011 GAYLORD OPRYLAND RESTRNT $14.02 DEB SCHMIDT 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 GAYLORD OPRYLAND HTL F/D $827.32 DEB SCHMIDT 05/14/2011 05/16/2011 DELTA AIR 0068242943662 $25.00 DEB SCHMIDT 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 GANDER MOUNTAIN $32.12 SCOTT SCHULTZ 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $252.99 SCOTT SCHULTZ 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPM $402.91 SCOTT SCHULTZ 05/18/2011 05/19/2011 JOES SPORTING GOODS $256.78 MICHAEL SHORTREED 05/18/2011 05/20/2011 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $80.79 ANDREA SINDT 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 POLAR DEN $20.00 CHRISTINE SOUTTER 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $11.62 CHRISTINE SOUTTER 05/06/2011 05/09/2011 LAKESHORE LEARNING #41 $4.24 CHRISTINE SOUTTER 05/13/2011 05/16/2011 DODGE NATURE CENTER $100.00 CHRISTINE SOUTTER 05/10/2011 05/11/2011 DICK'S CLOTHING&SPORTING $139.24 JAMES TAYLOR 05/12/2011 05/13/2011 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES530 $83.02 TODD TEVLIN 05/09/2011 05/09/2011 LEI*LANDS END CLOTHING $111.50 PAUL THEISEN 05/14/2011 05/16/2011 CABELAS RETAIL ROGERS $42.90 PAUL THEISEN 05/14/2011 05/18/2011 CABELAS RETAIL ROGERS ($42.90)PAUL THEISEN 05/13/2011 05/17/2011 GRAND VIEW LODGE & TENNIS $172.78 MICHAEL THOMPSON 05/05/2011 05/09/2011 DEMCO INC $70.62 KAREN WACHAL 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 TOMS TAILORS $9.64 JAY WENZEL 05/11/2011 05/12/2011 OVR*OVERSTOCK.COM $422.91 SUSAN ZWIEG 05/12/2011 05/16/2011 MINUTEMAN PRESS $94.71 SUSAN ZWIEG TOTAL $65,243.70 Packet Page Number 47 of 122 Check Description Amount 84400 02464 FUNDS FOR ATMS 7,000.00 84401 03877 REGISTRATION FEE 20.00 84402 03877 MEMBERSHIP DUES - SHANN FINWALL 20.00 84403 02407 SECURE BASKETBALL UNITS 3,494.81 84404 04206 PROSECUTION & LEGAL SRVS - JUNE 16,100.00 84405 00985 WASTEWATER - JUNE 216,688.14 84406 02105 MEMBERSHIP DUES 735.00 84407 01409 PROJ 04-21 ENGINEERING FEES 30,075.60 01409 PROJ 09-08 ENGINEERING FEES 13,653.96 01409 PROJ 10-14 ENGINEERING FEES 2,505.24 01409 PROJ 10-14 ENGINEERING FEES 1,959.21 01409 ENGINEERING FEES 448.56 84408 02274 SPRINT SRVS 4/15 - 5/14 6,673.32 84409 01750 MDSE FOR RESALE 432.41 01750 MDSE FOR RESALE 187.53 01750 MDSE FOR RESALE 27.69 84410 00504 MDSE FOR RESALE 310.50 00504 MDSE FOR RESALE 164.75 00504 MDSE FOR RESALE 125.00 84411 04888 EDUCATIONAL VIDEO SRVS-WATERSHED 590.00 04888 EDUCATIONAL VIDEO SRVS-WATERSHED 450.00 04888 EDUCATIONAL VIDEO SRVS-WATERSHED 420.00 04888 EDUCATIONAL VIDEO SRVS-WATERSHED 313.89 04888 EDUCATIONAL VIDEO SRVS-WATERSHED 224.46 04888 EDUCATIONAL VIDEO SRVS-WATERSHED 197.71 84412 00064 REIMB FOR MEALS 5/17 9.68 84413 04047 STAGE CREW MAY 13 MCC 100.00 84414 04471 SOUND SRVS MCC SEPT 9 500.00 84415 03738 RETAINER FOR LEGAL & RENT - JUNE 6,375.00 84416 03200 POLICE OFFICER FOR MAY 21 MCC 350.00 84417 04843 KETTLEBELLS INSTRUCTION 663.30 84418 03619 PROJ 10-14 SEWER TELEVISING 1,270.00 03619 PROJ 10-14 SEWER TELEVISING 170.00 84419 00003 ESCROW FRANZEN 1886 MCKNIGHT RD N 250.00 84420 04640 PROJ 08-09 LIONS PARK IMP PMT#4 7,828.00 84421 04428 CONCERT MCC MAY 13 2,000.00 84422 00827 RETROSPECTIVE PREMIUM PLAN 364.00 84423 00891 MAMA MEETING MAY 12 20.00 84424 00932 TOWN HALL MEETING/EMP RECOGNITION 44.60 84425 04193 FORFEITED VEHICLE STORAGE - MAY 2,250.00 84426 04316 AUTO PAWN SYSTEM - APRIL 545.40 84427 01060 EMPOLYMENT WEB AD ASST FIRE CHIEF 85.00 84428 04849 TEXAS HOLD'EM INSTRUCTOR 108.00 84429 00001 REFUND O'CONNORS APRIL PERMIT 133.00 84430 00001 REFUND M ACOSTA MEMBERSHIP 95.50 84431 00001 REFUND P MONSON MEMBERSHIP 76.40 84432 00001 REFUND L CHERRY YOUTH SOFTBALL 65.00 84433 00001 REFUND C SELBITSCHKA MEDICA 20.00 84434 04829 REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS 1/11-4/30 1,135.17 84435 01254 MDSE FOR RESALE 411.69 84436 01295 ESCROW REL PERMIER BANK PARKING 2,143.88 84437 04221 MDSE FOR RESALE 197.10 84438 01387 ADMIN FEE FOR STRESS TEST - MAY 100.00 Check Register City of Maplewood 05/27/2011 Date Vendor 05/26/2011 US BANK 05/31/2011 ASSOC OF RECYCLING MANAGERS 05/31/2011 ASSOC OF RECYCLING MANAGERS 05/31/2011 H & B SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS 05/31/2011 H.A. KANTRUD 05/31/2011 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 05/31/2011 MN TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE 05/31/2011 S.E.H. 05/31/2011 S.E.H. 05/31/2011 S.E.H. 05/31/2011 S.E.H. 05/31/2011 S.E.H. 05/31/2011 SPRINT 05/31/2011 THE WATSON CO INC 05/31/2011 THE WATSON CO INC 05/31/2011 THE WATSON CO INC 05/31/2011 1ST LINE/LEEWES VENTURES LLC 05/31/2011 1ST LINE/LEEWES VENTURES LLC 05/31/2011 1ST LINE/LEEWES VENTURES LLC 05/31/2011 ACCENT CO. 05/31/2011 ACCENT CO. 05/31/2011 ACCENT CO. 05/31/2011 ACCENT CO. 05/31/2011 ACCENT CO. 05/31/2011 ACCENT CO. 05/31/2011 MARK ALDRIDGE 05/31/2011 ASHLAND PRODUCTIONS 05/31/2011 B&B AVM INC. 05/31/2011 CHARLES E. BETHEL 05/31/2011 KEVIN COFFEY 05/31/2011 HEATHER JEAN DAYTON 05/31/2011 DRAIN KING INC 05/31/2011 DRAIN KING INC 05/31/2011 ESCROW REFUND 05/31/2011 FITOL HINTZ CONSTRUCTION INC. 05/31/2011 HELLO! BOOKING, INC. 05/31/2011 L M C I T 05/31/2011 M A M A 05/31/2011 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY 05/31/2011 MIDAMERICA AUCTIONS 05/31/2011 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS RECEIVABLES 05/31/2011 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC 05/31/2011 RICHARD NIELSEN 05/31/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 05/31/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 05/31/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 05/31/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 05/31/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 05/31/2011 CHRISTIE PENN 05/31/2011 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 05/31/2011 PREMIER BANK 05/31/2011 RANDY'S MEATS & GOOD STUFF 05/31/2011 DR. JAMES ROSSINI Packet Page Number 48 of 122 84439 01480 SCAN TOOL FOR NEWER VEHICALS 4,990.47 84440 01836 CRIME LAB SERVICES - APRIL 75.00 84441 01574 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 2,255.23 01574 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS 1,342.38 84442 03828 JODALE PERRY ROPS CAB 11,573.49 84443 01669 FORFEITED VEHICLE TOWING - APRIL 400.78 84444 01753 WINTER WEATHER SRVS 2010-2011 619.00 05/31/2011 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 05/31/2011 CITY OF ST PAUL 05/31/2011 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC 05/31/2011 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC 05/31/2011 TURFWERKS 05/31/2011 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & 05/31/2011 WEATHER WATCH, INC. 351,384.8545Checks in this report. Packet Page Number 49 of 122 Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description Amount 5/20/2011 5/23/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 9,221.01 5/23/2011 5/24/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 10,477.99 5/20/2011 5/25/2011 US Bank VISA One Card*Purchasing card items 65,243.70 5/24/2011 5/25/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 30,218.81 5/25/2011 5/26/2011 ING - State Plan Deferred Compensation 27,236.00 5/25/2011 5/26/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 25,313.98 5/25/2011 5/27/2011 ICMA (Vantagepointe)Deferred Compensation 4,087.76 5/26/2011 5/27/2011 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 1,836.00 5/26/2011 5/27/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 18,130.90 TOTAL 191,766.15 *Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Packet Page Number 50 of 122 Check Description Amount 84445 02464 FUNDS FOR ATMS 8,000.00 84446 00519 JET/VAC SEWER TRUCK 195,397.43 84447 00687 REMOVE HANGERS 406.13 84448 02728 PROJ 04-21 PROF SRVS THRU 4/30 54,984.15 02728 PROJ 08-13 PROF SRVS THRU 4/30 9,717.55 02728 PROJ 09-08 PROF SRVS THRU 4/30 5,000.55 02728 PROJ 09-04 PROF SRVS THRU 4/30 2,506.90 02728 PROJ 10-09 PROF SRVS THRU 4/30 2,434.35 84449 00393 MONTHLY SURTAX - MAY 11629123035 2,063.80 84450 04060 SCBA PARTS 1,089.88 84451 01202 MAPLEWOOD MONTHLY/SEASONS-JUNE 5,170.41 84452 01337 FLEET SUPPORT FEE - APRIL 595.84 01337 RADIO FLEET SUPPORT - APRIL 510.72 84453 01409 FLEET AUDIT 1,485.00 01409 DESIGN & SPECS JOY PARK PHASE II 520.35 84454 01750 MDSE FOR RESALE 449.51 01750 MDSE FOR RESALE 178.47 84455 01190 ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 22,787.63 01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 14,080.30 01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 50.51 84456 02324 SITE PREP-HERBICIDE-BEAVER CREEK 928.20 84457 04848 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JUNE 245.40 84458 00261 TIF PMT TO DEVELOPER 2ND HALF 2010 35,583.44 84459 02929 LTC MONTHLY PREMIUM - JUNE 479.54 84460 04342 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 150.00 84461 00003 ESCROW REL TASKMASTERS HALLER LN 1,500.00 84462 00644 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JUNE 10,552.20 84463 03818 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JUNE 142,261.04 84464 01085 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JUNE 3,558.75 84465 01126 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JUNE 448.00 84466 04793 SEMINARS - WORK ON WELLNESS 100.00 84467 03861 SURVEYING SUPPLIES 385.77 84468 00001 REFUND D ELMQUIST TRANS MEDIC 491.83 84469 00001 REFUND A GARBERS TRANS MEDIC 425.00 84470 00001 REIMB B RUFF SEWER TELEVISING 395.99 84471 00001 REFUND ASHCO EXTERIORS- PERMIT 97.00 84472 00001 REFUND L BEITEL TRANS MEDIC 80.81 84473 01284 MAILING CITY NEWS - JULY 4,500.00 84474 01418 SUPPLIES FOR CARVER GYM 241.59 01418 MEMBERSHIP FEES 215.00 01418 DANCE TREATS/KIDS CLUB SNACKS 66.65 01418 MEMBERSHIP FEES 50.00 01418 MDSE FOR RESALE 11.22 01418 KIDS CLUB SUPPLIES 7.56 84475 03879 EMS FEES - JUNE 577.08 84476 02930 REIMB FOR MILEAGE/MEALS/MISC 207.11 84477 01463 MCC MASSAGES - MAY 1-15 1,258.00 84478 01497 2011A BOND FEES 26,704.05 84479 01836 STREET LIGHT LOCATES 103.59 84480 00198 WATER UTILITY 1,124.86 00198 IRRIGATION - METER RESET & INSTALL 75.00 84481 01550 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS - MAY 2,550.00 84482 03598 SUN GLASSES - UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 50.0006/07/2011 PAUL THEISEN 06/07/2011 ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS 06/07/2011 ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS 06/07/2011 SUMMIT INSPECTIONS 06/07/2011 SISTER ROSALIND GEFRE 06/07/2011 SPRINGSTED INC 06/07/2011 CITY OF ST PAUL 06/07/2011 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 06/07/2011 SANSIO 06/07/2011 DEB SCHMIDT 06/07/2011 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 06/07/2011 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 06/07/2011 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 06/07/2011 POSTMASTER 06/07/2011 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 06/07/2011 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 06/07/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 06/07/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 06/07/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 06/07/2011 NORTHWEST LASERS, INC 06/07/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 06/07/2011 ONE TIME VENDOR 06/07/2011 MN LIFE INSURANCE 06/07/2011 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 06/07/2011 LYNN K. MUNSON 06/07/2011 ESCROW REFUND 06/07/2011 HEALTHPARTNERS 06/07/2011 MEDICA 06/07/2011 CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD 06/07/2011 CNAGLAC 06/07/2011 CRIME STOPPERS OF MINNESOTA 06/07/2011 XCEL ENERGY 06/07/2011 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES 06/07/2011 AVESIS 06/07/2011 THE WATSON CO INC 06/07/2011 XCEL ENERGY 06/07/2011 XCEL ENERGY 06/07/2011 S.E.H. 06/07/2011 S.E.H. 06/07/2011 THE WATSON CO INC 06/07/2011 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC 06/07/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV 06/07/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV 06/07/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 06/07/2011 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 06/07/2011 MES - MIDAM 06/07/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 06/07/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 06/07/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 06/07/2011 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO. 06/07/2011 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC 06/07/2011 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC Check Register City of Maplewood 06/03/2011 Date Vendor 06/01/2011 US BANK Packet Page Number 51 of 122 84483 04890 DEPOSIT FOR BAND - TASTE AUG 19 2,000.00 84484 01635 PROJ 09-13 HOLLOWAY/STANICH PMT#7 122,774.65 84485 00529 LTD PLAN 4043120-2 - JUNE 3,173.88 00529 STD PLAN 4043120-1 - JUNE 2,230.33 84486 02464 PAYING AGENT FEES 425.00 84487 02510 DEPOSIT PETTING ZOO FOR TASTE 600.00 84488 01754 REPAIR & MAINT FIRE EXTINGUISHER 79.41 06/07/2011 WALTON'S HOLLOW 06/07/2011 WEBER & TROSETH INC. 694,137.4344Checks in this report. 06/07/2011 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO 06/07/2011 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO 06/07/2011 US BANK 06/07/2011 TIM SIGLER BAND 06/07/2011 TOWER ASPHALT INC Packet Page Number 52 of 122 Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description Amount 5/26/2011 5/31/2011 Labor Unions Union Dues 3,755.02 5/26/2011 5/31/2011 MidAmerica - ING HRA Flex plan 15,573.44 5/26/2011 5/31/2011 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 20,373.76 5/26/2011 5/31/2011 P.E.R.A.P.E.R.A.85,761.25 5/26/2011 5/31/2011 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 94,031.21 5/27/2011 5/31/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 20,405.56 5/31/2011 6/1/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 26,270.75 5/31/2011 6/1/2011 US Bank Debt Service payments 2,187.50 5/31/2011 6/1/2011 US Bank Merchant Services Credit Card Billing fee 1,433.02 6/1/2011 6/2/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 33,501.82 6/2/2011 6/3/2011 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 30,672.02 TOTAL 333,965.35 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Packet Page Number 53 of 122 Agenda Item G2 MEMORANDUM      TO: James Antonen, City Manager FROM: DuWayne Konewko, Community Development and Parks Director Ginny Gaynor, Maplewood Natural Resources Coordinator SUBJECT: Consider Approval to Seek Bids for Joy Park Improvements Phase II DATE: June 6, 2011 for June 14, 2011 meeting INTRODUCTION In 2010, Maplewood completed Phase I improvements for Joy Park. In September 2010 Council approved Phase II improvements for Joy Park for $300,000, to be funded from PAC fees. Specifications have been prepared and staff is seeking council approval to go out to bid for Joy Park Phase II Improvements. DISCUSSION The Master Plan for Joy Park provides for active recreation, while protecting the significant natural resources of the park. The following improvements were completed under Phase I Joy Park improvements: 1) Installed Lake Links trail, 2) Installed new parking lot for boat launch area, 3) Installed five rain gardens to capture parking lot runoff, 4) Enhanced three wetlands and wetland buffer, 5) Installed two shoreline access points, 6) Restored 200’ of shoreline buffer, and 7) Installed fishing pier. Phase II improvements at Joy Park include: 1. Install two additional step access points along the shoreline. 2. Restore eroded shoreline areas to native vegetation. 3. Install bituminous trail and rustic trail. 4. Construct new parking lot with rain garden to filter runoff. 5. Install picnic shelter (add item depending on costs) In September 2010, City Council approved $300,000 for Joy Park Phase II, funded from PAC fees as follows: $150,000 2010 CIP for Joy Park $100,000 2011 CIP for Joy Park $ 50,000 2010 CIP for Trail Development In addition, staff will submit grants for shoreline restoration, which if received would increase the amount of shoreline restoration we can do. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the City Council consider approval for staff to seek bids for Joy Park Improvements Phase II. Packet Page Number 54 of 122 Agenda Item G3 AGENDA REPORT TO: Jim Antonen, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: May 25, 2011 RE: Approval of Lawful Gambling Temporary Permit for White Bear Avenue Business Association Introduction An application has been submitted for a temporary gambling permit by Leslie Nelson on behalf of the White Bear Ave Business Association, PO Box 9328, North St Paul. The permit is for the Ramsey County Fair. The event will be held at the Ramsey County Fair Grounds from July 13 through July 14, 2011 from 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. and July 15 through July17, 2011 from 12 p.m. to 12 a.m. In order for the State of Minnesota to issue a temporary gambling permit, approval is requested of the following resolution. RESOLUTION BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the temporary premise permit for lawful gambling is approved for White Bear Avenue Business Association, PO Box 9328, North St Paul, MN 55109 to be used on July 13, through July 1 7, 2011 at The Ramsey County Fair Grounds, 2020 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, MN 55109. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said license application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. Recommendation It is recommended that council approve the above lawful gambling resolution permit on for The White Bear Ave Business Association. Packet Page Number 55 of 122 Agenda Item G4 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Fund Transfer to Close CoPar Project 05-07 DATE: June 7, 2011 INTRODUCTION In 2008, the City Council finalized the CoPar Development project after resolving all claims regarding approval of the project. The project fund was never closed and contains costs regarding the preparation of the site EAW. The EAW was prepared by the City and the cost of the preparation was to be reimbursed when the land was sold and as a condition of approval of future land-use proposals. As the City proceeds to work to acquire the property, the EAW costs remain within the system as an unpaid claim. It is proposed to close Fund 811, Project 05-07, with a transfer of funds from the General Fund. Approval of a fund transfer is recommended. RECOMMENDED ACTION It is recommended that the City Council approve a transfer of $20,242.45 from the General Fund to Fund #811 for the purpose of closing this Fund Account and authorize the Finance Manager to make the appropriate budget adjustments. Packet Page Number 56 of 122 P:\COUNCIL FILES\AGENDAS\2011\061-insurance agent 11-12.doc AGENDA NO. G-5 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Manager RE: Approval of Resolution Authorizing Purchase of Insurance Agent Services DATE: June 1, 2011 INTRODUCTION Council authorization is requested to purchase insurance agent and broker of record services from Arthur J. Gallagher and Company at a cost of $12,000 for the period from 7/1/11 through 6/30/12. The current cost is $12,000. This company serves as the broker of record for the city’s property and liability insurance coverage that is with the League of Minnesota Cities insurance Trust. This is a recurring contract. Arthur J. Gallagher was selected through a request for proposals (RFP) process in 2004. FINANCIAL IMPACT This cost is budgeted for in the 2011 Budget. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution to retain Arthur J. Gallagher and Company as our insurance agent at a cost of $12,000. Packet Page Number 57 of 122 P:\COUNCIL FILES\AGENDAS\2011\061-insurance agent 11-12.doc Councilmember _______________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED THAT Arthur J. Gallagher and Company be re-appointed as the broker of record and insurance agent at a cost of $12,000 for the insurance year starting July 1, 2011 and continuing through June 30, 2012 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember _____________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the attached resolution is a true and correct copy of an extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota duly called and held, as such minutes relate to the re-appointment of Arthur J. Gallagher and Company as the broker of record and insurance agent for the City of Maplewood starting July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012. ______________________________ City Clerk Packet Page Number 58 of 122 AGENDA REPORT TO: James Antonen, City Manager FROM: Michael Thompson, City Engineer/ Dep. Public Works Director Steven Love, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Carsgrove Meadows Area Street Improvements, City Project 08-10, Resolution Approving Final Payment and Acceptance of Project DATE: May 17, 2011 INTRODUCTION The contractor, Miller Excavating, Inc., has completed the project improvements for the Carsgrove Meadows Area Street Improvements, City Project 08-10. The city council will consider approving the attached resolution for acceptance of the project and approving final payment to the contractor. BACKGROUND The public improvements for the Carsgrove Meadows Area were ordered by the City Council on January 26, 2009. Construction began in June of 2009 and was completed in the summer of 2010. On May 28, 2009, the city council awarded Miller Excavating, Inc. a construction contract for utility and roadway improvements in the amount of $1,816,784.00. The following change orders have been approved by the city council: Change Order #1: $32,022.90 Approved 7/20/2009 Change Order #2: $135,500.00 Approved 9/14/2009 Change Order #3: $21,557.50 Approved 9/28/2009 Total Change Order: $189,080.40 The revised approved awarded construction contract total is $2,005,864.40. The final construction cost is $1,904,736.00. The final construction cost is $101,128.40 below the approved contract amount. Miller Excavating, Inc. has provided the Consent of Surety to Final Payment, Contractor’s Withholding Affidavits (IC 134s), and Affidavits of Release of Liens. BUDGET The current approved budget for the project is $2,857,000.00. The current expenses incurred to date total $2,545,632.12 so there will be an overall project savings. Once all financial transactions have been completed staff will bring back the final financing plan and recommend closure of the project fund. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution for the Carsgrove Meadows Area Street Improvements, City Project 08-10, Approving Final Payment and Acceptance of Project. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Location Map 3. Final Payment Application Agenda Item G6 Packet Page Number 59 of 122 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT CITY PROJECT 08-10 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered Improvement Project 08-10, the Carsgrove Meadows Area Street Improvements, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that the Carsgrove Meadows Area Street Improvements, City Project 08-10, is complete and recommends acceptance of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that 1. City Project 08-10 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city; and the final construction cost is $1,904,736.00. Final payment to Miller Excavating, Inc., Incorporated, and the release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. Approved this 13th day of June 2011. Agenda Item G6 Attachment 1 Packet Page Number 60 of 122 Agenda Item G6 Attachment 2 Packet Page Number 61 of 122 Agenda Item G6 Attachment 3 Packet Page Number 62 of 122 Agenda Item G6 Attachment 3 Packet Page Number 63 of 122 Agenda Item G6 Attachment 3 Packet Page Number 64 of 122 Agenda Item G6 Attachment 3 Packet Page Number 65 of 122 Agenda Item G6 Attachment 3 Packet Page Number 66 of 122 MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Antonen, City Manager Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager FROM: Larry Farr, Chief Building Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Parking Lot Light Pole Replacements for City Campus DATE: June 6, 2011 for June 13, 2011City Council Meeting INTRODUCTION The campus parking lot light poles are starting to see the end of their life cycle and there is a need to monitor and maintain them in a safe and working order. BACKGROUND City staff has been inspecting and monitoring the light poles since 2007 and noted some rust and wall thinning when inspected. In 2010 there was an incident where a light pole failed rusting out from the inside and fell, causing damage to a vehicle parked in the Court House lot. The majority of campus light poles were installed at grade or ground level increasing their exposure to salt, and extended moisture contact which increased the rusting. DISCUSSION With this failure all campus light poles were inspected more intensely by Muska Electric to identify other light poles with structural concerns. The inspection identified five (5) poles in need of replacement due to their condition. Staff supported the findings and the poles were ordered with installation planned once on site. Staff discussed the concern of the way the poles were initially installed and the determination was made to raise the bases to twenty four inches which is standard height on any replaced light poles. The height of the light poles would be maintained at the same height. The installation was more involved than expected once started and the final expense came in over the $10,000 amount requiring Council preapproval at $12,845. FINANCIAL IMPACT There are sufficient funds budgeted in 101-115-000-4410 in 2011 to cover the increased cost. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting city council approval after the fact to spend city funds of $12,845 from 101-115-4410 Repair and Maintenance of Buildings. Attachment: Muska Electric Co. Invoice Agenda Item G7 Packet Page Number 67 of 122 Agenda Item G7 Attachment 1 Packet Page Number 68 of 122 MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Antonen, City Manager Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager FROM: Larry Farr, Chief Building Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Uniform Contract with G&K DATE: June 6, 2011 for June 13, 2011City Council Meeting INTRODUCTION The uniforms, mats, and rags for city staff at Public Works, Parks, City Hall and Maplewood Community Center are contracted currently with G&K Services on a one year renewing contract. BACKGROUND City staff went out for bid to combine the city uniforms, mats and rags in 2005 to help reduce expenses by combining departments under one vendor. G&K Services was the low bidder and was signed to a five (5) year contract which expired in 2010. The contract has a one (1) yearly renewing clause which was executed in 2010 and 2011. Staff was aware of G&K Services being involved with the State Contract RFP for uniforms, mats, rags, and other supplies in 2011. DISCUSSION With the G&K Services having the potential to be awarded the State Contract, staff allowed the City contract to be extended another one (1) year with the thought of possible benefits if G&K Services was awarded the contract. G&K Services’ proposal with the State was the winning bid which will be in place for five (5) years. By waiting, the city is able to reap the benefits of getting the same pricing as the State Contract for the same length of time which will equate to a savings of approximately $7,728 per year or $38,638 over the term of the contract for the City. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending city council approval to sign a five (5) year contract to match the State contract pricing for city departments using G&K Services. Attachments: G&K Services Contracts Agenda Item G8 Packet Page Number 69 of 122 Agenda Item G8 Attachment 1Packet Page Number 70 of 122 MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Antonen, City Manager Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager FROM: Larry Farr, Chief Building Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Maplewood Community Center Court Area Lighting Installation DATE: June 6, 2011 for June 13, 2011City Council Meeting INTRODUCTION The City of Maplewood submitted for and received an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) for $163,900 in 2010 to be used for seven (7) Activities submitted by staff for Stimulus funded projects. One of the last projects to be completed is to Upgrade Lighting (retrofitting) at Maplewood Community Center in the court area and under the walking track. BACKGROUND The stimulus project to replace the court area and under the walking track lighting was submitted by staff and approved as part of the EECBG Grant. The project will also qualify for an Xcel rebate for Lighting Retrofitting. The current fixtures were installed in 1994 and have been repaired and replaced as required. The original proposed total EECBG Grant amount for this project was $60,487.00 with $20,900 of Stimulus funds and the City Leveraged amount of $39,587.00. In April of 2011 the City modified our grant request and there is now approximately $32,000 available for this project. DISCUSSION The current lights are used for activities in the Basketball Court area, Motion Zone, and Strength Area. They are controlled by individual switches that turn off whole rows from end to end, which is inefficient. The retrofit system will include going from 400 watt Metal Halide fixtures to 6 lamp T-8 fluorescent at the ceiling and 2 lamp T-8 fixtures under the walking track. These fixtures will be vandal resistant with wire guards and or acrylic lens. There will be sensors strategically located so that only areas of the gym that are in use will be lighted. There will also be over-ride switching for use during special occasions. The retrofit fixtures will be located to replace a “One for One” with the current fixtures and will also be wired with a plug to be able to swap out for maintenance. The existing wiring will be reused where possible to reduce expenses. The fixtures will be purchased using a local vendor and be installed using in-house labor as much as possible working with Connect Electric to complete this project. Connect Electric has submitted an estimate of $14,400 to assist with the installation. The quote for the light fixtures from Viking Electric for both locations is $12,599.75. RCS Equipment Rental will be providing the lift for the installation of the fixtures for $2,533.90. Staff is estimating in-house labor involvement of 122 hours at $35.00/hour for a total amount $4,270.00. We have spent $3,643.64 to date from the Stimulus fund researching light fixtures and installation solutions. It is estimated to take four weeks to complete the project limiting the impact on member usage. There is only one bidder for these items due to the dollar amount or work performed to date. The anticipated yearly Savings Analysis provided by Budget Lighting Specialist is $5,838.46 Agenda Item G9 Packet Page Number 71 of 122 FINANCIAL IMPACT Approximately $32,000 of this project will be paid for with stimulus funds. The balance (City share) will be paid from the Community Center Operations Fund. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending city council approval for proceeding with this Stimulus Project using the listed vendors for a total amount of $37,447.29. The project account number for tracking setup by Finance is 120907-0030-0280.  Connect Electric $14,400.00 Electrician Installation  Viking Electric $12,599.75 Light Fixtures  RSC Equipment Rental $ 2,533.90 Lift Equipment Rental  Expense to Date $ 3,643.64 Connect Electric: $725.00, Muska Electric:  $2,065.79, Budget Lighting Inc.: $852.85  Staff Labor (Estimate) $ 4,270.00 Set-up, installation, and support work  TOTAL $37,447.29 Attachments: 1. Connect Electric Quote 2. Viking Electric Quote 3. RSC Equipment Rental Quote 4. Connect Electric Invoice 5. Muska Electric Invoice 6. Budget Lighting Inc. Invoice and Savings Analysis Agenda Item G9 Packet Page Number 72 of 122 Agenda Item G9 Attachment 1Packet Page Number 73 of 122 Agenda Item G9 Attachment 2Packet Page Number 74 of 122 Agenda Item G9 Attachment 3Packet Page Number 75 of 122 Agenda Item G9 Attachment 4Packet Page Number 76 of 122 Agenda Item G9 Attachment 5Packet Page Number 77 of 122 Agenda Item G9 Attachment 6Packet Page Number 78 of 122 Agenda Item G9 Attachment 6Packet Page Number 79 of 122 Agenda Item G9 Attachment 6Packet Page Number 80 of 122 AGENDA NO. G-10 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution to Maintain Statutory Tort Liability Limits DATE: June 8, 2011 BACKGROUND Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide each year whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. This decision must be made by the City Council. Attached is a schedule from the League showing the different options associated with waiving and not waiving the statutory limits. The City has elected to not waive the statutory tort limits in the past which would limit recovery to $500,000 per claimant and $1,500,000 per occurrence for the upcoming policy period. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution to not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. Packet Page Number 81 of 122 LMCIT Liability Coverage Options Coverage structure If the city: On a liability claim to which the statutory limits apply On a liability claim to which the statutory limits do not apply This is the maximum amount a single claimant could recover on an occurrence. This is the maximum total amount that all claimants could recover on a single occurrence. This is the maximum amount of damages which LMCIT would pay on the city’s behalf for a single occurrence, regardless of the number of claimants. Does not have excess coverage & Does not waive the statutory limits $500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Does not have excess coverage & Waives the statutory limits $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Has $1,000,000 of excess coverage & Does not waive the statutory limits $500,000 $1,500,000 $2,500,000 Has $1,000,000 of excess coverage & Waives the statutory limits $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Packet Page Number 82 of 122 A RESOLUTION TO MAINTAIN THE STATUTORY TORT LIMITS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE PROPOSED WHEREAS, pursuant to previous action taken, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has asked the City to make an election with regards to waiving or not waiving its tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and WHEREAS, the choices available are; to not waive the statutory limit, to waive the limit but to keep insurance coverage at the statutory limit, and to waive the limit and to add insurance to a new level; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Maplewood City Council does hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability limit established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and, that such election is effective until amended by further resolution of the Maplewood City Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at a regular meeting held June 13, 2011. ATTEST: ______________________________ __________________________________ Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk William Rossbach, Mayor Packet Page Number 83 of 122 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Packet Page Number 84 of 122 MEMORANDUM TO: James Antonen, City Manager FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Myth Nightclub Shared Parking Agreement with the Plaza 3000 LOCATION: 3090 Southlawn Drive DATE: June 6, 2011 INTRODUCTION On January 24, 2011, the city council approved a liquor license for Mike Miranowski, the new owner of the Myth Nightclub (see the attached motion). One condition of this license approval was that, “The maximum occupancy of the building shall be 1,450. Any change in the occupancy limit must be approved by the city council based on additional parking spaces secured by lease agreements and approved by the city council.” On March 28, 2011, the city council approved a parking agreement that Mr. Miranowski made with the owner of Ashley Furniture to use 115 of their parking spaces for events at the Myth. This allowed the building occupancy to be increased to 1,944 persons from the previously approved 1,450. On April 11, 2011, the city council approved a parking agreement that Mr. Miranowski made with the owner of the Day’s Inn to use 150 of their parking spaces for events at the Myth. This allowed building occupancy to be increased to 2,544 persons from the previously approved 1,944. Proposal Mr. Miranowski now has a parking agreement with Azure Properties, the owner of the Plaza 3000 shopping center at 3000 White Bear Avenue, to use 200 of their parking spaces for event parking. This would increase the permitted building occupancy by 800 more persons to 3,344 persons. Parking Calculations The parking stall count for the Myth is as follows based on the new parking agreement with the Azure Properties at Plaza 3000: Maximum Building Occupancy 4,400 persons (including Myth personnel) Number of Parking Spaces Required For Maximum Occupancy 1,100 Parking at the Myth 371 Parking at Ashley Furniture 115 Parking at the Days Inn 150 Proposed Parking at the Plaza 3000 200 Total Available Parking Spaces 836 Number of Shared Spaces Still Needed for Maximum Occupancy 264 Agenda Item I1 Packet Page Number 85 of 122 2 DISCUSSION The applicant’s agreement would allow the use of 200 parking spaces at the Plaza 3000 parking lot. In the middle of the proposed 200 parking spaces is the area of the parking lot currently being used by Linder’s Nursery for their temporary green house and plant sales. This part of the parking lot is also used seasonally for Christmas tree, pumpkin and lawn ornament sales throughout the year. The applicant’s proposed 200 parking spaces do not include the area used by these seasonal sales activities. It should also be noted that 25 parking stalls in the southwest corner of the parking lot are currently being used for material storage for the White Bear Avenue roadway improvement project. Staff is not concerned over this temporary, short term use of these 25 spaces as a road construction staging area since this project is only anticipated to last through the autumn of 2011. Staff’s Concerns Staff questions how realistic it is for Myth patrons to actually use the Plaza 3000 parking lot. The Plaza 3000 is about a four block walk from the Myth. Staff suspects that Myth patrons may simply choose to park closer in other nearby parking lots rather than walk that distance. Staff is also concerned about the temptation there may be for theft and vandalism in the Plaza 3000 parking lot when the seasonal outdoor sales activities are in operation. Staff does not have a strong enough opinion on these points to recommend denial of this parking agreement, but we certainly have the concerns noted above. The city council may wish to consider what is a reasonable and realistic distance for Myth patrons to walk with these shared parking arrangements. 2005 Council Directive The use of nearby parking lots should be subject to the following conditions from the 2005 council directive regarding shared parking for the Myth:  Post each entrance to the parking lot with the name and location of the overflow parking lots.  Ramsey County sheriff officers must patrol each lot (on site and off site).  Parking attendants must be stationed at each lot (on site and off site).  Parking attendants must direct traffic to overflow lots.  Clean-up of each lot (on site and off site) must take place prior to 6 a.m. the next day. (Please note that staff is recommending that a 12-hour timeframe be applied instead of the 6 a.m. deadline as it seems to be a reasonable alternative. Clean-up within 12 hours is also in the applicant’s parking agreement.)  Any future shared-parking agreements shall be submitted to staff for approval and adjustment of the maximum allowed occupancy.  The maximum allowed occupancy shall be 4,400 persons unless that number is revised by the fire marshal.  Any future parking agreements shall be for a minimum of one year and must ensure notification to the city by both parties within 90 days of expiration.  All agreements must be reviewed by the city attorney. Packet Page Number 86 of 122 3 BUDGET IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Approve the shared parking agreement between the owners of the Myth Nightclub and the Plaza 3000 shopping center to allow the Myth to utilize 200 parking spaces for their needs. Approval of this agreement is subject to the review and approval by the city attorney and the owner of the Myth doing the following: 1. Posting each entrance to the Myth parking lot with the name and location of the overflow parking lots. 2. Arranging for Ramsey County Sheriff officers to patrol each parking lot (on site and off site). 3. Providing parking attendants to be stationed at each parking lot (on site and off site). 4. Providing parking attendants to direct traffic to overflow parking lots. 5. Make sure to clean up each parking lot (on site and off site) within 12 hours of the conclusion of a Myth event where overflow parking was utilized. 6. Submit any future shared-parking agreements to the city staff for approval and adjustment of the maximum allowed occupancy. All agreements shall be subject to approval by the city attorney. 7. Assure that the maximum allowed occupancy shall be 4,400 persons (dependent upon providing enough parking spaces to support this number), which includes all Myth staff and personnel, unless that number is revised by the fire marshal. The presence of staff and personnel will always factor into the total allowed occupancy regardless of whether shared parking is a factor or not. 8. Assure that any future parking agreements shall be for a minimum of one year. 9. Notify the city in writing within 90 days if either party in a parking agreement wishes to terminate the agreement. p:\sec2n\Myth\Myth Plaza 3000 Parking Agreement CC Report 6 11 te Attachments: 1. Location Map for The Myth and the Plaza 3000 2. January 24, 2011 City Council Minutes 3. Parking License Agreement between the Myth and the Plaza 3000 4. Site Plan of Plaza 3000 Parking Lot Packet Page Number 87 of 122 Attachment 1 Packet Page Number 88 of 122 Packet Page Number 89 of 122 Attachment 3 Packet Page Number 90 of 122 Packet Page Number 91 of 122 Packet Page Number 92 of 122 Packet Page Number 93 of 122 Attachment 4 Packet Page Number 94 of 122 1 MEMORANDUM TO: James Antonen, City Manager FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Auto Sales by Fleet Associates, Inc. LOCATION: 2495 Maplewood Drive DATE: June 6, 2011 INTRODUCTION Chris and Diane Johnson, of Fleet Associates, Inc, are requesting a conditional use permit (CUP) to sell automobiles from a business condo located at the Maple Leaf Ridge Business Center, 2495 Maplewood Drive. Refer to the attached narrative and maps. Project Description The proposed use would be operated as follows:  This business would involve the acquisition and disposition of vehicles.  The vehicles may be late model lease or rental returns.  The applicants meet their clients in the client’s office, seldom using their own location.  The majority of the applicants’ fleet is stored in an offsite ramp not in Maplewood.  Vehicle reconditioning will be done offsite, not at this proposed location.  The use of the proposed property will be primarily an office use.  There would not be any attention-getting flags, banners, etc. BACKGROUND November 28, 2005: The city council approved a CUP and design plans for the Maple Leaf Ridge Business Center. The CUP allowed a reduced setback from the residential lot property line to the west. The code requires that buildings in M1 (light manufacturing) districts be 350 feet or more from abutting residential property, unless a CUP is granted. The westerly building is 250 feet from the abutting residential lot line. DISCUSSION Department Comments Building Department Assistant building official, Nick Carver, commented that the applicant must meet with the building department to review plans for any interior remodeling or construction. Agenda Item J1 Packet Page Number 95 of 122 2 Engineering Report Staff engineer, Jon Jarosch, stated that, “it appears that there will be no exterior changes to the property and that traffic generated by the business is not in excess of what would be anticipated for this property. Therefore, the engineering department has no specific requirements at this time. If site changes are proposed in the future, they will be subject to review by the city.” Police Lieutenant Richard Doblar provided the following comments (Lieutenant Doblar’s full report is attached):  This site is not designed as a used car lot, therefore, security for parked vehicles is not good.  Vandalism is a potential for parked cars.  Site lighting should be improved if cars are parked outside, however, this could be a nuisance for the residential neighbors to the west. In conclusion, Lieutenant Doblar states, “since Northland Associates’ business model is not to open a typical used car lot, I would limit their scope of allowable vehicle parked there to no more than five vehicles at a time.” Neighbor’s Comments Staff surveyed the 38 property owners within 500 feet of the site including the business condo owners at the Maple Leaf Ridge Business Center to get their input regarding this proposal. Staff received nine replies. Five were supportive, two were concerned about the parking of cars on the property, one questioned if this approval could be converted to another “used car sales” business and one was opposed. Parking Concerns  The number of cars that may be parked along the west (back) side of the property could be an issue.  Parking is already “maxed out” on the site. Additional cars parked outside may conflict with other tenant and customer parking needs. Carry Over to another Used Car Sales Business  Can this property, once licensed to sell used cars, be sold at some point to a “true” used car dealer who would then carry on-site inventory? I propose you limit “car inventory” to no more than five cars on site. Packet Page Number 96 of 122 3 Opposed  The person in opposition to this proposal felt that there were already too many car-sales lots in the area. Maplewood should be encouraging businesses offering new jobs and those that would not hasten the decline of the city. Staff’s Comments There are parking spaces available on site. The parking is getting tight between the buildings, but there are available spaces in the rear of the site that are not used. The applicant’s response to this is that they will park up to five cars within the building. They do not plan on parking cars outside in the parking lot, but do not deny that it could happen. Mr. Johnson said that if they are limited to a maximum of five cars parked outside, that would not be a problem. The zoning ordinance allows the opportunity of a CUP for used car sales, but also states that this activity may not be closer than 350 feet to a residential district. Being that the applicant must meet this 350 foot parking separation from the west lot line, they may not park cars for sale any closer than the front of their building. This will also eliminate the neighbor’s concern about the potential of cars parked along the rear of the property. It should be understood, however, that these spaces are provided to park cars for this development. These spaces are unused currently, but, they are available for other tenant and customer use. This CUP, if approved, will limit the operation to the terms set by the city council. Another operator cannot expand on this permit unless they would get approval to do so by the council. Therefore, if another car sales business took over this business, they could not expand the amount of outdoor car inventory parked on the site. CUP Findings for Approval The zoning ordinance requires that the city council find that all nine “standards” for CUP approval be met to allow a CUP. In short, these state that the use would (refer to the resolution for the complete wording):  Comply with the city’s comprehensive plan and zoning code.  Maintain the existing or planned character of the neighborhood.  Not depreciate property values.  Not cause any disturbance or nuisance.  Not cause excessive traffic.  Be served by adequate public facilities and police/fire protection.  Not create excessive additional costs for public services.  Maximize and preserve the site’s natural and scenic features.  Not cause adverse environmental effects. The proposed car sales business meets these nine criteria. Packet Page Number 97 of 122 4 Conclusion Staff does not foresee any problem with this request. As proposed, it would be essentially an office use. The zoning ordinance prohibits the activity of car sales and car storage within 350 feet of a residential property line, so that activity cannot occur behind the building. As we typically do for small used car sales businesses, staff recommends a condition that would prohibit the use of the typical attention-getting used car displays such as signs, flags, banners and the like. COMMISSION ACTION May 17, 2011: The planning commission recommended approval of this CUP with the staff recommendation. BUDGET IMPACT None. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permit to operate a used car sales business from 2495 Maplewood Drive at the Maple Leaf Ridge Business Center. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 2. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 3. The applicant shall not park any vehicles from their for-sale inventory any closer than 350 feet of the westerly property line as required by ordinance. 4. The applicant shall not park more than five vehicles from their for-sale inventory outside on the site. 5. The applicant shall not use any attention-getting displays on vehicles that are parked outside such as flags, banners, signs (painted or otherwise), etc. 6. The applicant shall apply for a building permit for any proposed construction of building remodeling. Packet Page Number 98 of 122 5 CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 38 property owners within 500 feet of the subject site, including the business condo owners at the Maple Leaf Ridge Business Center, to get their input regarding this proposal. Staff received the following nine replies:  I am assuming the office would be on the east side of the building since the back side has dock doors. I would be concerned about the number of cars kept on the site and were they would be parked. (no name or address given)  It’s good to have more business in our area. (no name or address given)  I have no objections. (David Bjorkquist, 2473 Adele Street)  I don’t have any concerns with this proposal. Good luck to Mr. and Mrs. Johnson. (Jeff Dick, 2505 Adele Street N)  I have no problem with Chris Johnson’s proposed application. This is the type of use we should welcome in Maplewood. I’m curious why we did not receive similar notice regarding the proposed mental health facility or low income housing proposals for the neighborhood??? (Mark Warner, 2504 Cypress Street) Staff comment: Mr. Warner’s property is beyond the notification radius for the mental health care facility (currently being reviewed by staff. There is no low income housing proposal proposed in this neighborhood. That seems to be a local rumor.  Sounds like a plan. (Don Huot, Huey’s Saloon, 2425 Highway 61)  Can this property, once licensed to sell used cars, be sold at some point to a “true” used car dealer who would then carry on-site inventory? I propose you limit “car inventory” to no more than five cars on site. (no name or address given)  Refer to the attached letter from Robert Long of Gladstone’s Window & Door Store. Mr. Long states that the parking on the site is already getting “maxed out.” He is concerned that if additional cars are parked outside, there won’t be adequate parking for day-to-day retail customers.  Refer to the attached email reply from Piotr Nowak of 1033 Demont Street opposed to this proposal. Packet Page Number 99 of 122 6 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 4.6 acres Existing land use: Maple Leaf Ridge Business Center SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Hmong American Alliance Church South: Acorn Mini Storage East: Maplewood Drive West: Single dwellings PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: C (commercial) Zoning: M1 (light manufacturing) CODE REQUIREMENTS  Section 44-637(a)(1) of the M1 ordinance applies the requirements of the BC (business commercial) district. Section 44-512(5) of the BC district requires a CUP to store, lease or sell motor vehicles. Also, this storage, leasing or sales of motor vehicles must be no closer than 350 feet to a residential district. Findings for CUP Approval  Section 44-1097(a) requires that the city council base approval of a CUP on nine findings. Refer to the findings for approval in the resolution. APPLICATION DATE The application for this request was complete on April 20, 2011. State law requires that the city decide on land use applications within 60 days. The deadline for council action, therefore, is now June 19, 2011. Packet Page Number 100 of 122 7 p:sec9\Fleet Associates CUP for Auto Sales CC Report 6 11 te Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Land Use Plan Map 3. Site Plan 4. Applicant’s Written Narrative 5. Memo from Lieutenant Doblar dated April 27, 2011 6. Letter from the Gladstone Window and Door Store dated April 28, 2011 7. Email response from Piotr Nowak dated April 27, 2011 8. Resolution Packet Page Number 101 of 122 Packet Page Number 102 of 122 Packet Page Number 103 of 122 Packet Page Number 104 of 122 Packet Page Number 105 of 122 Packet Page Number 106 of 122 Packet Page Number 107 of 122 Packet Page Number 108 of 122 Packet Page Number 109 of 122 Packet Page Number 110 of 122 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Chris and Diane Johnson, of Fleet Associates, Inc. applied for a conditional use permit to operate a used car sales business. WHEREAS, Section 44-512(5) of the city ordinances requires a conditional use permit to store, lease or sell used motor vehicles. Further, code requires that these activities not occur closer than 350 feet to residential property. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 2495 Maplewood Drive. The legal description is: W. H. HOWARD’S GARDEN LOTS EX STH 61-1 N 85 FT OF LOT 3. W. H. HOWARD’S GARDEN LOTS EX STH 61-1 AND EX N 85 FT LOT 3. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On May 17, 2011, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission also considered the report and recommendation of city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On June 13, 2011, the city council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council __________ the above-described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and this Code. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. Attachment 8 Packet Page Number 111 of 122 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. Staff may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant shall not park any vehicles from their for-sale inventory any closer than 350 feet of the westerly property line as required by ordinance. 5. The applicant shall not park more than five vehicles from their for-sale inventory outside on the site. 6. The applicant shall not use any attention-getting displays on vehicles that are parked outside such as flags, banners, signs (painted or otherwise), etc. The Maplewood City Council __________ this resolution on ___________. Packet Page Number 112 of 122 May 17, 2011 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 1 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2011 5. PUBLIC HEARING a. Conditional Use Permit for Auto Sales by Fleet Associates, Inc., 2495 Maplewood Drive i. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand gave the report and answered questions of the commission. Chairperson Fischer opened the public hearing. 1. Fleet Associates, Inc. owners, Chris and Diane Johnson addressed and answered questions of the commission. 2. Bob Long, President, Gladstone’s Window and Door, 2475 Maplewood Drive, Suite 110, Maplewood. Chairperson Fischer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Boeser moved to approve the resolution approving a conditional use permit to operate a used car sales business from 2495 Maplewood Drive at the Maple Leaf Ridge Business Center. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: (changes are in bold and underlined). 1. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 2. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 3. The applicant shall not park any vehicles in their for-sale inventory any closer than 350 feet to the westerly property line as required by ordinance. 4. The applicant shall not park more than five for-sale vehicles outside on the site. 5. The applicant shall not use any attention-getting displays that are parked outside such as flags, banners, signs (painted or otherwise), etc. 6. The applicants shall apply for a building permit for any proposed construction of building remodeling. Seconded by Commissioner Bierbaum. Ayes – Chairperson Fischer, Commissioner’s Bierbaum, Boeser, Desai & Martin Nay – Commissioner Pearson The motion passed. This item goes to the city council June 13, 2011. Packet Page Number 113 of 122 1 MEMORANDUM TO: James Antonen, City Manager FROM: Michael Martin, AICP Planner Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Seventh Street East and Ferndale Street Right-of- Ways Vacation LOCATION: 2505 Minnehaha Avenue East – Union Cemetery Property DATE: June 3, 2011 INTRODUCTION The City of Maplewood’s Public Works Department is requesting the city vacate excess Seventh Street East and Ferndale Street right-of-ways. The right-of-ways are not needed and unused and would be attached to a portion of property the city has purchased from Union Cemetery. A small portion of the proposed vacated right-of-way falls outside of the area the city has purchased and would be dedicated back to the Union Cemetery property. Maps displaying the vacated areas and the area the city has purchased are attached to this report. DISCUSSION On December 13, 2010, the city council approved the purchase of approximately two acres from Union Cemetery. The city had previously been leasing this area which contains a trail segment for the city’s Nature Center. The purpose of this request is to provide both the city and Union Cemetery parcels that are free of unused right-of-ways. To the south of this proposal, Ferndale Street has already been vacated within the Union Cemetery parcel. Union Cemetery plans to build a cremation garden and it was the desire of both parties to vacate the unused portions of the right-of-ways during the purchase process. COMMISSION ACTION 1. The city is not using the right-of-way for a public street. Planning Commission On May 17, 2011, the planning commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the proposed public vacations for the Seventh Street East and Ferndale Street right-of-ways. BUDGET IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution attached to this report. This resolution is for the vacation of the Seventh Street East and Ferndale Street right-of-ways. The reasons for the vacation are as follows: It is in the public interest since; 2. The right-of-way is not needed for street access purposes as the adjacent properties have street access at other points. Agenda Item J2 Packet Page Number 114 of 122 2 This approval is subject to: 1. Comply with the requirements contained within Assistant City Engineer Steve Love’s report dated April 7, 2011. 2. All legal descriptions must be approved by staff. P:\SEC25\\UnionCemeteryVacation_CC_061311 Attachments: 1. Assistant City Engineer Steve Love’s comments, dated April 7, 2011 2. Area Map 3. Proposed Legal Description for the Vacations 4. Purchase Area Map 5. Planning Commission minutes, May 17, 2011 6. Vacation Resolution Packet Page Number 115 of 122 Attachment 1 Packet Page Number 116 of 122 Seventh Street East and Ferndale Street Vacation Location Map Attachment 2 UnionCemetery NatureCenter Packet Page Number 117 of 122 Attachment 3 Packet Page Number 118 of 122 Attachment 4 Packet Page Number 119 of 122 Attachment 5 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2011 5. PUBLIC HEARING b. Seventh Street East and Ferndale Street Right-of-Way Vacations i. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand gave the report and answered questions of the commission. Chairperson Fischer opened the public hearing. 1. Mayor Will Rossbach, 1386 County Road C East, Maplewood. Chairperson Fischer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Pearson moved to approve the resolution. This resolution is for the vacation of the Seventh Street East and Ferndale Street right-of-ways. The reasons for the vacation are as follows: It is in the public interest since; 1. The city is not using the right-of-way for a public street. 2. The right-of-way is not needed for street access purposes as the adjacent properties have street access at other points. The approval is subject to: 1. Comply with the requirements contained within Assistant City Engineer Steve Love’s report dated April 7, 2011. 2. All legal descriptions must be approved by staff. Seconded by Commissioner Tushar. Ayes – All The motion passed. This item goes to the city council June 13, 2011. Packet Page Number 120 of 122 Attachment 6 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, applied for the vacation of the following: Block 16, vacated East Seventh Street and vacated Ferndale Street, originally dedicated as Seventh St. and Union Ave., respectively, all in THE UNION CEMETERY, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (Said THE UNION CEMETERY being the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West). WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On May 17, 2011, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. 2. On June 13, 2011, the city council considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following property: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence westerly, along the northerly line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 52 minutes 00 Seconds West a distance of 543.21 feet; thence South 55 degrees 08 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 278.95 feet; thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 265.53 feet; thence northeasterly a distance of 66.31 feet along a non- tangential curve, concave to the southeast, having a radius of 55.70 feet, a central angle of 68 degrees 12 minutes 35 seconds and a chord that bears North 49 degrees 56 minutes 58 seconds East; thence southeasterly a distance of 47.37 feet along a non-tangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a radius of 72.50 feet, a central angle of 37 degrees 26 minutes 05 seconds and a chord that bears South 78 degrees 26 minutes 23 seconds East; thence North 40 degrees 36 minutes 25 seconds East, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 27.83 feet; thence South 49 degrees 23 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 40.06 feet; thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 76.61 feet; thence North 13 degrees 14 minutes 59 seconds East to the north line of said Lot 1; thence westerly, along the north line of said Lot 1, to the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence northerly to the point of beginning and there terminating. Packet Page Number 121 of 122 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council _______ the above-described vacation for the following reasons: It is in the public interest since; 1. The city is not using the right-of-way for a public street. 2. The right-of-way is not needed for street access purposes as the adjacent properties have street access at other points. . This approval is subject to: 1. Comply with the requirements contained within Assistant City Engineer Steve Love’s report dated April 7, 2011. 2. All legal descriptions must be approved by staff. The Maplewood City Council _________ this resolution on June 13, 2011. Packet Page Number 122 of 122