Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-14-20050 C. 711 E. F. MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:02 P.M. Monday, March 14, 2005 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 05-05 CALL TO ORDER: A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the City Hall, and was called to order at 7:02 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present Jackie Monahan-Junek, Councilmember Absent Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes from the Council/Manager Workshop, February 28, 2005 Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the minutes from the February 28, 2005 City Council/Manager workshop as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All 2. Minutes from City Council Meeting -February 28, 2005 Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the minutes from the February 28, 2005 City Council Meeting as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All APPROVAL OF AGENDA K9. Justice Assistance Grant M1. Maplewood 50th Anniversary Committee M2. Cable Commission M3. Ramsey County League of Local Government M4. Maplewood Library M5. Democratic Governance Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS City Council 03-14-05 G. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 391,709.00 Checks # 66352 thru # 66408 dated 02/25/05 thru 03/01/05 $ 158,750.61 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 02/18/05 thru 02/24/05 $ 244,566.91 Checks # 66409 thru # 66460 dated 03/08/05 $ 291,793.94 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 02/25/05 thru 03/03/05 $ 1,086,820.46 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 02-25- $ 434,000.27 05 $ 3,840.69 Payroll Deduction check # 100628 thru # 100631 dated 02-25-05 $ 437,840.96 Total Payroll $ 1,524,661.42 GRAND TOTAL 2. Conditional Use Permit Review — Kline Nissan (3090 Highway 61 North) Approved to review the conditional use permit for Kline Nissan 3090 Maplewood Drive again in six months (September 2005). The conditional use permit can be reviewed sooner if a problem arises or the applicants propose a major change to the site. 3. Conditional Use Permit Review — Hillcrest Animal Hospital (1320 County Road D) Approved to review the permit in the future only if a problem arises or if Hillcrest Animal Hospital proposes a major change to the site. 4. Purchase of Two Police Vehicles Authorized the purchase of two 2005 Ford Crown Victorias for use by the Police Department's volunteer programs. 5. Temporary Gambling — Temporary Liquor — Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary City Council 03-14-05 2 Adopted the following resolution for a temporary gambling and temporary liquor application for Stephen Klein on behalf of the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 1725 Kennard Street: RESOLUTION 05-03-023 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the temporary premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary (BVM), 1725 Kennard Street, Maplewood, Minnesota. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. 6. Grading of the Southwind Builder's Site, City Project 04-31 — Resolution for Acceptance of Project Adopted the following resolution for Acceptance of Project for the Grading of the Southwind Builders site, City Project 04-31: RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT 05-03-024 WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that the City Improvement: Grading of the Southwind Builders Site, City Project 04-31, is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 04-31 is complete and maintenance of this improvement is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt consent agenda item 1 and 3-6. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes -All Mark Weis, Manager of Kline Nissan (3090 Highway 61 North) addressed council regarding the concerns the council had with the conditional use permit. Council encouraged Mr. Weis to inform the dealership of his concerns and to ensure the conditions are met. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt consent agenda item 2. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes -All H. PUBLIC HEARINGS None AWARD OF BIDS None City Council 03-14-05 3 J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Gladstone Neighborhood Development Moratorium Extension (Second Reading) a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Community Development Director Coleman presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the second reading of the following ordinance extending the development moratorium for the Gladstone Neighborhood for six months or until the city council approves a redevelopment plan for this area, whichever comes first: ORDINANCE NO. 861 AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM FOR THE GLADSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD The area under consideration (hereinafter "Gladstone Neighborhood") includes land generally located along Frost Avenue and English Street in Maplewood as follows: properties south of the Gateway Trail, properties north of Frisbee Avenue, properties east of Phalen Place North, and properties west of Ide Street North (refer to Gladstone Neighborhood Strategic Planning Study Area map attached for exact location). The Maplewood City Council ordains: SECTION 1. PURPOSE 1.01 The City of Maplewood is conducting a strategic planning study that includes land use planning components for the Gladstone Neighborhood. 1.02 The objective of the study is to design a strategic development plan including drawings and design standards the city can use, along with city ordinances, to achieve a sustainable, livable center for this neighborhood. 1.03 In addition to the study, the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, and comprehensive plan may need to be revised to reflect the following issues: - Land use - Building setbacks - Building height - Design standards for buildings - Pedestrian flow and safety - Parking - Streetscaping - Signage - Lighting - Landscaping - Housing density 1.04 There is a need for this study to be conducted so that the city can adopt changes to the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, comprehensive plan, and design standards for the redevelopment of the Gladstone Neighborhood. 1.05 There, further, is a need to extend the previously -adopted moratorium ordinance six months for the continued planning study of the Gladstone Neighborhood. City Council 03-14-05 4 SECTION 2. STRATEGIC PLANNING STUDY; MORATORIUM 2.01 The study is authorized by the city. City staff shall coordinate this study with the Metropolitan Council, hired consultants, Gladstone property and business owners, interested citizens, city council, and various city commissions and boards. 2.02 Upon completion of the study, it shall be presented to the planning commission and community design review board for their review and recommendation to the city council. 2.03 A moratorium on development in the Gladstone Neighborhood is adopted pending adoption of the study and any amendments to the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, or comprehensive plan as deemed necessary as a result of the study by the city council. The city will not approve any subdivision, design plans or building permit for commercial, institutional, or multi -family residential land uses for the exterior construction of new buildings or additions, and freestanding signs during the moratorium period. SECTION 3. TERM 3.01 The term of this ordinance extension shall be for one and one-half years from the date of it's original adoption or until such time as the city council adopts the study and any amendments to the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, or comprehensive plan as deemed necessary as a result of the study. SECTION 4. VARIANCES 4.01 Variances from this ordinance may be granted by the city council based upon a determination that a proposed subdivision or development would be compatible with proposed land use and zoning, and that such proposals would keep with the spirit and intent of this ordinance. The procedures to be followed in applying for a variance from this ordinance shall be in accordance with state law on findings for variances and shall include the following: a. The applicant shall file a completed application form, together with required exhibits, to the Community Development Department. b. The application for a variance shall set forth special circumstances or conditions which the applicant alleges to exist, and shall demonstrate that the proposed subdivision or development is compatible with existing or proposed land use and zoning. C. The application shall be submitted to the planning commission for their review and recommendation to the city council. d. The city council may in its discretion set a public hearing prior to making a final determination on the requested variance. e. The city council may impose such restrictions upon the proposed subdivision or development as may be necessary to comply with the purpose and intent of this ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All 2. Code Amendment — POD's (Second Reading) a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Community Development Director Coleman presented specifics from the report. City Council 03-14-05 5 Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following ordinance amendment to the Portable On -Demand Storage Unit: Ordinance 860 Section. 30-7 Unlawful disposal; location of containers for collection - portable on -demand storage units (PODs); disposal of inflammable or explosive materials. (h) No property owner or person shall store on a residential property a portable on - demand storage unit (POD) more than 60 days in any 12 -month period starting with the day/date the POD is first moved on-site. All PODs must be stored on an impervious surface on the property. The City may grant a time extension of an additional 60 days provided the Property owner gets a tracking permit for the POD from the City. In no case shall a POD be stored on a property more than 120 days in any 12 -month period. This provision applies to all residential properties including townhouses, condominiums, and multi -family complexes. PODs stored on residential properties in conjunction with a building permit or home improvement project are exempt from this provision, except for the requirement to keep the POD on an impervious surface. In such a case, the property owner shall make every effort to adhere to the 120 day maximum time limit. Language that is underlined and bolded represents the proposed ordinance additions. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All K. NEW BUSINESS Schlomka Property Proposed Development, South of Carver Avenue at Henry Lane -- Concept Plan Review and Consider Request for Preparation of Environmental Assessment Worksheet a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Public Works Director Ahl presented specifics from the report. C. Commissioner Trippler presented the Planning Commission Report d. Clark Whitland, Representing Rottlund Homes, expressed that they were not ready to present a Concept Plan Review to the council and requested to withdraw the request for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet at this time. Councilmember Koppen moved to accept Rottlund Homes request to table their request for an Environment Assessment Worksheet at this time. Second Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - All 2. Trout Land Auto Dealerships (County Road D, west of Highway 61) Conditional Use Permit (Parcel 1) Conditional Use Permit (Parcel 2) a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Perry Thorvig, Consultant Planner presented specifics from the report. C. Commissioner Trippler presented the Planning Commission Report City Council 03-14-05 6 d. Jim Kellison Representing Trout Land, Proposed Business Owners Steve Bloomer and Bryan Tetters (representing Ryan Companies) addressed questions from the City Council. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit for a used car sales and automotive repair for the property known as Parcel 1 in the Trout Land development located on the west side of Highway 61, north of the future County Road D extension. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Motion Denied Mayor Cardinal moved to reconsider. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-Councilmember Koppen and Juenemann Nays—Councilmember Rossbach and Mayor Cardinal Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Juenemann and Koppen Nays-Councilmember Rossbach Councilmember Juenemann moved that council suspended this item and move to the next item so that the applicant can reconsider his options. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All Applicant asked council to table this item until the April 11, 2005 City Council Meeting. Councilmember Juenemann moved to table the items for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 until the April 11, 2005 City Council Meeting. Seconded Councilmember Rossbach 3. Overview (McMenemy Street, south of Roselawn Avenue) Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plat Design Approval a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Senior Planner Ekstrand presented specifics from the report. C. Gordie Howe, representing Masterpiece Homes Ayes -All Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Overview Development on the west side of McMenemy Street, south of Roselawn Avenue. The city bases this approval on the finding require by code: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 05-03-025 WHEREAS, Mr. Gordie Howe, representing Masterpiece Homes, applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the Overview residential planned unit development (PUD). City Council 03-14-05 7 WHEREAS, this permit applies to undeveloped property on the west side of McMenemy Street, south of Roselawn Avenue in Section 18, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 18-29-22-32-0009.) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: On February 23, 2005, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The commission also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the proposed permit. 2. On March 14, 2005, the city council discussed the proposed conditional use permit. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described conditional use permit, because: The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans date-stamped January 25, 2005, except where the city requires changes. Such changes shall include: a. Revising the grading and site plans to show: (1) Revised storm water pond locations and designs as suggested or required by the watershed district or city engineer. The ponds shall meet the city's NURP Pond ordinance standards. (2) The developer minimizing the loss or removal of the remaining vegetation and large trees. City Council 03-14-05 8 (3) The street (Summer Avenue) must beat least 28 feet wide to allow parking on one side. The city council may approve major changes to the plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall meet all the conditions and changes noted in Chuck Vermeersch's memo dated February 14, 2005, and the plans shall include: a. The grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, driveway, trails, tree preservation/replacement, and parking plans. The cul-de-sac bulb shall have the minimum radius necessary to ensure that emergency vehicles can turn around. b. The following changes for the storm sewer plans: (1) The developer shall enclose the new pond with a four -foot -high, black, vinyl -coated chain-link fence. The contractor also shall install a gate in the fence along McMenemy Street as may be required by the city engineer. (2) Provide for staff approval a detailed storm water management plan. c. The following for the streets and driveways: (1) Curb and gutter along the street, if the city engineer decides that it is necessary. d. Providing at least one additional fire hydrant between McMenemy Street and the end of the cul-de-sac, so there are at least two hydrants along the street. 4. The design of the ponds shall meet Maplewood's NURP pond ordinance standards and shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall be responsible for getting any needed off-site pond and drainage easements, if applicable. 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the ponds, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.*Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Remove any debris, junk or fill from the site. 6. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in Overview PUD shall be: a. Front -yard setback (from a public street or a private driveway): minimum - 20 feet, maximum — 35 feet b. Front -yard setback (public side street): minimum - 30 feet, maximum - none c. Rear -yard setback: 20 feet from any adjacent residential property line d. Side -yard setback (townhouses): minimum - 20 feet minimum between buildings. City Council 03-14-05 9 7. The developer or builder will pay the city Park Access Charges (PAC fees) for each housing unit at the time of the building permit for each housing unit. 8. The city council shall review this permit in one year. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the preliminary plat for a planned unit development of the Overview Development on the west side of McMenemy Street, south of Roselawn Avenue. The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Provide all required and necessary easements (including ten -foot drainage and utility easements along the front and rear lot lines of each lot and five-foot drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines of each lot). d. Have Xcel Energy install Group V rate street lights in at least three locations. One light shall be at the intersection of McMenemy Street and the proposed street (Summer Avenue), one in the middle of the block and the third near the west end of the street near the cul-de-sac. The exact style and location shall be subject to the city engineer's approval. e. Pay the city for the cost of traffic -control, street identification and no parking signs. f. Cap, seal and abandon any wells that may be on the site, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines. 2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, driveway, tree, and street plans. The plans shall meet all the conditions and changes listed in the memo from Chuck Vermeersch dated February 14, 2005, and shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall show: (1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each building site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) Building pads that reduce the grading on site where the developer can save large trees. (4) The street and driveway grades as allowed by the city engineer. (5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. On slopes steeper than 3:1, the developer shall prepare and implement a stabilization and planting plan. These slopes shall be protected with wood fiber blanket, be seeded with a no -maintenance vegetation and be stabilized before the city approves the final plat. City Council 03-14-05 10 (6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than four feet require a building permit from the city. The developer shall install a protective rail or fence on top of any retaining wall that is taller than four feet. (7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. (8) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements from the affected property owner(s). (9) A minimum of a 10 -foot -wide, 10:1 bench below the normal water level (NWL) of any pond designed to be a wet pond. The depth of the pond below the NWL shall not exceed four feet. (10) Emergency overflow swales as required by the city engineer or by the watershed district. The overflow swales shall be 10 feet wide, one foot deep and protected with approved permanent soil -stabilization blankets. (11) The drainage areas and the developer's engineer shall provide the city engineer with the drainage calculations. The drainage design shall accommodate the run-off from the entire project site and shall not increase the run-off from the site. (12) A creative design for the proposed storm water pond with curves, rather than straight sides, for a more aesthetic design and visual appeal. The pond, however, shall have the required storm water capacity. c.* The tree plan shall: (1) Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or final plat approval. (2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site. (3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement and screening trees. The deciduous trees shall be at least two and one half (2 %2) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of red and white oaks, ash, lindens, sugar maples or other native species. The coniferous trees shall be at least eight (8) feet tall and shall be a mix of Austrian pine, Black Hills spruce and other species. (4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. (5) Include for city staff a detailed tree planting plan and material list. (6) Group the new trees together. These planting areas shall be: (a) near the ponding area (b) along the north and south sides of the site to help screen the development from the existing houses to the north and from the MnDOT facility. (7) Show the planting of at least 120 trees after the site grading is done. d. The street, driveway and utility plans shall show: City Council 03-14-05 11 (1) The street (Summer Avenue) shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections at two percent. (2) Water service to each lot and unit. (3) Repair of McMenemy Street (street and boulevard) after the developer connects to the public utilities and builds the private driveway. (4) The developer enclosing the new pond with a four -foot -high, black, vinyl -coated chain- link fence. (The fence shall not be six feet high as shown on the plans.) The contractor also shall install a gate in the fence as may be required by the city engineer. (5) The private driveways with continuous concrete curb and gutter except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed for drainage purposes. (6) The coordination of the water main locations, alignments and sizing with the standards and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS). Fire -flow requirements and hydrant locations shall be verified with the Maplewood Fire Department. (7) All utility excavations located within the proposed right-of-ways or within easements. The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would be outside the project area. (8) The plan and profiles of the proposed utilities. (9) Details of the ponds and the pond outlets. The outlets shall be protected to prevent erosion. e. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm -water run-off leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels. The developer's engineer shall: (1) Verify pond, inlet and pipe capacities. (2) Have the city engineer verify the drainage design calculations. 3. Pay the costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans. 4. Change the plat as follows: a. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. b. Label the common areas as outlots. c. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. d. Label the street as Summer Avenue on all plans. 5. Secure and provide all required easements for the development. These shall include any off- site drainage and utility easements. 6. Sign a developer's agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: City Council 03-14-05 12 a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Provide for the repair of McMenemy Street (street, curb and gutter and boulevard) after the developer connects to the public utilities and builds the private driveway. 7. Submit the homeowners' association bylaws and rules to the city for approval by the director of community development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the care and maintenance of the common areas, private utilities, landscaping and retaining walls. 8. Record the following with the final plat: a. All homeowners' association documents. b. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the lots or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved by the city council. c. A covenant or association documents that addresses the proper installation, maintenance and replacement of any retaining walls. The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for approval before recording. 9. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 10. Obtain a permit from the Watershed District for grading. 11. Obtain a NPDES construction permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). 12. Obtain the necessary approvals and permits from MnDOT. 13. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the plans date-stamped January 25, 2005, (site plan, landscape plan, grading and drainage plans and building elevations) for the Overview town houses on the west side of McMenemy Street, south of Roselawn Avenue. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the code. The developer or contractor shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit: City Council 03-14-05 13 a. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, sidewalk and driveway plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions and shall also meet all the conditions and changes noted in Chuck Vermeersch's memo dated February 14, 2005. (1) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with city code. (2) The grading plan shall: (a) Include building, floor elevation and contour information for each home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (b) Include contour information for the land that the construction will disturb. (c) Show sedimentation basins or ponds as may be required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. A revised design for the storm water pond that shows curves, rather than straight sides, for a more aesthetic design and visual appeal. The pond, however, shall have the required storm water capacity. (d) Show all proposed slopes steeper than 3:1 on the proposed construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. This shall include covering these slopes with wood -fiber blankets and seeding them with a "no mow" vegetation rather than using sod or grass. (e) Show all retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls more than four feet tall require a building permit from the city. (f) Show the proposed street and driveway grades as allowed by the city engineer. (g) Show the drainage areas and the developer's engineer shall provide the city engineer with the drainage calculations. The drainage design shall accommodate the run-off from the surrounding areas. (h) Show details about the proposed fence by the pond including the materials, gate, height and color. The contractor shall extend the fence along the east side of the pond, near McMenemy Street. (3) The tree plan shall: (a ) Be approved by the city engineer. (b) Include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site and shall show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. (c) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The coniferous trees shall be at least eight feet tall and shall be a mix of Black Hills spruce and Austrian pine. (d) Be consistent with the approved grading and landscape plans and shall show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. (4) The street, driveway and utility plans shall show: (a) A water service to each lot and unit. City Council 03-14-05 14 (b) The repair and restoration of McMenemy Street (including curbing, street, and boulevard) after the contractor removes the existing driveways, connects to the public utilities and builds the new street. (c) All driveways at least 20 feet wide. If the developer wants to have parking on one side of the street, then it must be at least 28 feet wide. (d) The street and the driveways shall have continuous concrete curb and gutter except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed. (e) The developer or contractor shall post one side of the street with "no parking" signs to meet the above -listed standards. (f) The street labeled as Summer Avenue and McMenemy Street labeled on all plans. (g) The common area labeled as Outlot A on all plans (5)The design of the ponding area and the rainwater garden(s) shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall be responsible for getting any needed off-site utility, grading or drainage easements and for recording all necessary easements. b. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction and have each building staked by a registered land surveyor. c. Submit a revised landscape plan to staff for approval which incorporates the following details: (1) All lawn areas shall be sodded. The city engineer shall determine the vegetation within the ponding area. (2) The addition of trees for screening along the north and south sides of the site. (3) The developer shall install landscaping in the ponding area to break the appearance of the deep hole and to promote infiltration. Such landscaping shall be approved by the city engineer and shall be shown on the project landscape plans. (4) Having in -ground irrigation for all landscape areas (code requirement). (5) The plantings proposed around the front of the units shown on the landscape plan date-stamped January 25, 2005, shall remain on the plan. (6) A concrete walk from the driveway to the door of each unit. (7) The manicured or mowed areas from the natural areas. This shall include planting (instead of sodding) the disturbed areas around the ponding area with native grasses and native flowering plants. The native grasses and flowering plants shall be those needing little or no maintenance and shall extend at least four feet from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the pond. This is to reduce maintenance costs and to reduce the temptation of mowers to encroach into the gardens. Specifically, the developer shall have the natural areas seeded with an upland mixture and lowland mixtures as appropriate. (8) In addition to the above, the contractor shall sod all front, side and rear yard areas (except for mulched and edged planting beds and the area within the ponding area). City Council 03-14-05 15 (9) The contractor shall restore the McMenemy Street boulevard with sod. (10) Adding at least 12 more evergreen trees (Black Hills spruce or Austrian pines) along the north and south property lines of the site. These trees are to be at least eight feet tall and the contractor shall plant these trees in staggered rows to provide screening for the houses to the north. (11) Shows the in -ground lawn -irrigation system, including the location of the sprinkler heads. (12) Shall be approved by the city engineer before site grading and shall be consistent with the approved grading and landscape plans. d. Show that Ramsey County has recorded the final plat for this development. e. Get the necessary approvals and permits from the watershed district. f. Submit a revised site lighting plan for city approval. This plan shall show how the lighting on the buildings would add to the site lighting. This plan also shall show details about the proposed light fixtures to ensure they are a design that hides the bulb and lens from view to avoid nuisances. The light fixtures must have concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield glare from the adjacent street right-of-ways and from adjacent residential properties. g. Have the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) approve the proposed utility plans. h. Present to staff for approval colored building elevations or building material samples of all elevations of the town houses. These elevations should show that the town houses will have two tones of ivory and beige -colored vinyl siding and either brick or stone accents on the front elevation. These elevations also should show that the front elevations would have a wainscot of brick or stone. i. The developer or builder will pay the city Park Access Charges (PAC fees) for each housing unit at the time of the building permit for each housing unit. j. Submit the homeowners' association bylaws and rules to the city for approval by the city staff. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the care and maintenance of the common areas, the private utilities, landscaping and any retaining walls. k. Obtain the necessary approvals and permits from MnDOT. I. Provide the city with a letter of credit or cash escrow for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. 3. Complete the following before occupying each building: a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards and sod all turf areas. c. Complete all landscaping and turf irrigation for that building and its rainwater garden(s). d. Install the required concrete curb and gutter. City Council 03-14-05 16 d. Install a reflectorized stop sign at the exit onto McMenemy Street and addresses on each building for each unit. In addition, the applicant shall install "no parking" signs within the site, as required by staff. e. Install and maintain all required landscaping (including the plantings around each unit and around the pond) and an in -ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas (code requirement). f. Install on-site lighting for security and visibility that follows the approved site lighting plan. All exterior lighting shall follow the approved lighting plan that shows the light spread and fixture design. The light fixtures must have concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield glare from the adjacent street right-of-ways and the nearby homes and residential properties. g. Install a six -foot -high solid screening fence or additional trees along the north and south property lines of the site where the vegetation does not adequately screen the town houses from the existing dwellings. These additional materials are to ensure there is at least a six- foot -tall, 80 percent opaque screen on these sides of the site. The location, design and materials of the fence or the additional landscaping shall be subject to city staff approval. h. The developer or contractor shall: (1) Complete all grading for the site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. (2) Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. (3) Remove any debris or junk from the site. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The above -required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the city for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished landscaping by June 1 of the next year if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All 4. Outdoor Storage Area Conditional Use Permit Revision (Police Impound Lot - 1160 Frost Avenue) a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Senior Planner Ekstrand presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution revising the conditional use permit for the outdoor storage yard located at 1160 Frost Avenue: City Council 03-14-05 17 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION 05-03-026 WHEREAS, Steve Lukin, Fire Chief for the City of Maplewood, applied for a conditional use permit revision to allow a police department impound lot on a site previously approved for outdoor vehicle and material storage. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1160 Frost Avenue. The legal description is: VACATED ALEY ACCRUING AND FOLLOWING, LOTS 1 THRU 10 AND LOTS 16 THRU 20, BLOCK 1, KAVANAGH AND DAWSON'S ADDITION TO GLADSTONE, AND VACATED ALLEY ACCRUING AND FOLLOWING, LOTS11 THRU LOT 15, BLOCK 1, KAVANAGH AND DAWSON'S ADDITION TO GLADSTONE. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: On February 23, 2005, the planning commission held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on March 14, 2005. The council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described conditional use permit revision because: The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. City Council 03-14-05 18 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: = Outside vehicle storage is allowed. The director of community development shall review the proposed layout for all outdoor storage since there is no current site plan. = The city council shall review this permit revision annually from the date of this approval. In addition this permit shall end on November 1, 2007, as previously required. • The property owner shall clean the site of all debris and shall cut or remove any noxious weeds. This shall be done on a regular basis. • The temporary storage of work-related materials such as dirt piles and cable spools, for example, may be permitted. These materials may be kept on site for no more than one month. No more than 25 percent of the site shall be used for the storage of such materials. This condition is left in as part of this permit in case the applicant leases this property to another user such as Quality Restorations, for whom the permit was originally approved. • Normal hours of operation shall be 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Exceptions will be allowed to provide emergency service to customers. The permitted hours of the impound lot are 24 hours a day, seven days a week, unless the city receives complaints, in which case, there shall be no impound lot activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.. • The city council will need to approve a revision to this permit if the owner wants to put a permanent building on the site. • The owner or operator shall provide a dumpster in the storage yard for business garbage if a use other than the police impound lot takes place on this property. • The owner or operator shall provide a driveway to the gate of the storage yard, subject to the requirements of the fire marshal. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All 5. Public Works Building Addition, City Project 03-19 — Resolution Considering Approval of Project Plans and Specifications and Authorize Receipt of Bids a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer AN presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution approving the project plans and specifications for the Public Works Building Expansion, City Project 03-19, and authorizing the receipt of bids at 10:00 a.m. on April 14, 2005: RESOLUTION 05-03-027 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on March 14, 2005, plans and specifications for the Public Works Building Expansion, City Project 03-19, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval, City Council 03-14-05 19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk. 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the council at 10:00 a.m. on the 14th day of April, 2005, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of April 25, 2005. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes -All 6. Gladstone North Neighborhood Street Improvements, Project 04-15 — Resolutions for Approval of Plans & Advertising for Bids and Ordering Assessment Roll a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer AN presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Rossbach moved to adopt the following resolutions for the Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, Project 04-15: Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids and Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment Roll: RESOLUTION 05-03-028 APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on November 22nd, 2004, plans and specifications for Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, Project 04-15 have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk. 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the council at 10:00 a.m. on the 15th day of April, 2005, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount City Council 03-14-05 20 of such bid. 3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of April 25th, 2005. RESOLUTION 05-03-029 ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer will receive bids for the Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, City Project 04-15. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. thereof. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All 7. Springside Drive Extension, Project 03-36 — Resolutions for Approval of Plans & Advertising for Bids and Ordering Assessment Roll a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer AN presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolutions for the Springside Drive Extension, West of Sterling Street, Project 03-36: Approving Plans and Advertising For Bids and Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment Roll: RESOLUTION 05-03-030 APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on August 9th, 2004, plans and specifications for Springside Drive Extension, West of Sterling Street, City Project 03-36, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk. 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the council at 10:00 a.m. on the 15th day of April, 2005, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a City Council 03-14-05 21 certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of April 25th, 2005. RESOLUTION 05-03-031 ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer will receive bids for the Springside Drive Extension, West of Sterling Street, City Project 03-36. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. thereof. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes -All 8. Board and Commission Reappointments a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the reappointment of the following members to the Park Commission for a three year term: Peter Fisher Craig Brannon Carolyn Peterson Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All Councilmember Koppen moved to interview those that have applied for the CDRB and the Planning Commission including current members whose terms are up for appointment before the next council meeting at 6:00 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach 9. Justice Assistance Grant a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Chief Thomalla presented specifics from the report. Ayes -Council members Juenemann, Koppen and Rossbach Nays -Mayor Cardinal Councilmember Juenemann moved to authorize the Police Department to enter into the Interlocal Agreement to apply for and accept grant money under the Justice Assistance Grant. City Council 03-14-05 22 Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Kim Schmidt, 1800 Phalen Place, expressed concern regarding the condition of the temporary police impound lot that will be located at 1160 Frost Avenue. 2. Ron Cockriel, 943 Century Avenue, was present to invite the council to an open house at the Benedictine Monastery (corner of Century and Larpenteur Avenue) to discuss future plans and projects of the Monastery. The Sierra Club will also be present to speak about the environmental impact of future projects. The meeting will be held on March 19, 9:00 a. m. to 11:30 a. m. 3. Robert Erickson, 47 Kingston, was present to express concerns about the speeding traffic in his neighborhood. City Engineer Ahl stated the city review of stop signs is held annually in May. The notice of the May date will be posted in the Maplewood City News. M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 50th Anniversary Committee — Mayor Cardinal expressed a desire to establish a 50th Anniversary Committee for the purpose of preparation for the event. Councilmember Rossbach moved to establish a 50th Anniversary Committee. Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - All 2. Cable Commission — Councilmember Koppen and Mayor Cardinal presented current Cable Commission issues. Issues included a recommendation from Tim Finnerty, Director of the Ramsey/Washington Cable Commission, to oppose the proposed Senate Bill 688 and the House Companion Bill 1319. Councilmember Koppen moved to direct staff to send a letter opposing Senate Bill 688 and House Companion Bill 1319. Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes - All 3. Ramsey County League of Local Government — Councilmember Juenemann announced that next meeting will be held Thursday, March 24th at the Shoreview City Hall Council Chambers from 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. The topic will be meth labs, meth use and their impact on communities. 4. Maplewood Library Construction — Councilmember Rossbach opened discussion regarding shared parking between the library and city property during the construction period. 5. Democratic Governance — Councilmember Rossbach discussed issues from the League of Minnesota Cities Magazine regarding citizen involvement. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS Dispatch Response Letter — City Manager Fursman read the city's response letter to Commissioner McDonough regarding the current dispatch consolidation proposal. Council discussed their thoughts on the current proposal. Council directed City Manager Fursman to make the requested changes to the letter and e-mail the draft to the council for final approval. City Council 03-14-05 23 2. Set Second Retreat Date -The second 2005 council/staff retreat date was set for June 10, 2005. Details to be announced at a future council meeting. O. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Juenemann moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:47 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - All City Council 03-14-05 24 _67 MEMORANDUM March 11, 2005 TO: Commissioner Mary Koppen & Alternate Commissioners Bob Cardinal & Kim Facile FROM: Tim Finnerty, Ramsey/Washington Cable Commission SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO OPPOSE S.F. 688 & H.F. 1319 On behalf of the Ramsey/Washington Cable Commission, we are recommending that member municipalities oppose S.F. 688 (and its House companion bill H.F. 1319), and we are recommending that member municipalities immediately urge the League of Minnesota Cities to oppose it as well. The bill, put forward by the Minnesota Telephone Association (MTA), would create an alternative method of franchising cable systems to providers different from the method used for the incumbent franchise (in our case, the franchise currently held by Comcast). It would allow telephone companies may obtain a video franchise at reduced requirements relative to the incumbent franchise pertaining to service area, as well as technical and financial provisions for local programming. Unfortunately, Ramsey/Washington Cable Commission and other local franchising authorities found numerous problems with the bill that will be harmful. MALTA, the association of municipal franchising authorities and experts in the field, opposes the bill and has recommended the League of Minnesota Cities oppose it as well. The League of Minnesota Cities board of directors will meet on March 17 and will revisit the matter. To this point, LMC has taken a supportive position, but may consider a change in position. It is critical to express concerns immediately. LMC opposition is crucial to preventing passage of the bill. Attached is a summary of the problems and points of concern. Please contact me if you have questions or wish to discuss this, and please advise me of any action you take. Thank you. OPPOSE S.F. 688 & H.F. 1319 (the bill of the Minnesota Telephone Association seeking to amend cable franchising statutes) Generally, the bill language is poorly crafted, unclear, and incompatible with other state and federal laws and rules. Therefore, it is doubted that municipal implementation will achieve the alleged benefits (fostering fair competition among multiple providers), and instead it will yield conflict, confusion, litigation, and negative results. Also, incumbent franchisees, including Comcast, believe this will create franchises with inherent, unfair competitive advantages for new providers. And given the lack of clarity and confusion of the bill, that possibility cannot be ruled out from the perspective of franchising authorities. Because of that, it is reasonable to expect that incumbent franchisees like Comcast will seek legislative protection to assure equal treatment to the lowest threshold required of any franchise granted pursuant to this bill if it becomes law. Some of the specific problems are as follows: The bill imposes a 180 -day timeline within which the municipal must accept or reject a franchise request. Given the complexity of the other problems identified with the bill's franchising process, the 180 -day timeline will likely be insufficient. This sets up a scenario in which municipalities would be required to reject the franchise request simply because time ran out. Under Federal law, rejections must have a reasonable basis. The bill's franchising process relative to PEG provisions (local access channels, programming, technology, and associated financing) is unclear and badly conceived, thus implementation is doubtful. A new franchisee's obligation to provide PEG provisions depends entirely upon whether the incumbent franchisee permits the new video provider to interconnect and retransmit the existing PEG programming to the new provider's customers. If that is not permitted, the new provider would not carry PEG programming. Additionally, the bill allows the new provider to obtain its franchise and begin subscriber services BEFORE determining any such interconnection arrangements with the incumbent. Beyond that, the bill's language relative to PEG funding and in-kind contributions (I-NETs, interconnection, and other public service provision) are similarly flawed. In conclusion, while the goal of fostering competition is shared by all parties, this bill will not accomplish that. It creates a special franchising process for new providers that allow then to gain an unfair competitive advantage over the incumbent, who is locked into its franchise granted under the current process. Municipalities should oppose this. AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Richard Fursman From: Chief of Police David J. Thomalla Subject: Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Date: March 14, 2005 Introduction The Police Department is requesting permission to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the St. Paul Police Department, Ramsey County and the Roseville Police Department to apply for a federal Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). Background In previous years, the Police Department has received Local Law Enforcement Block Grants (LLEBG). These grants are no longer available but have been replaced by the Byrne Memorial Grant. We are requesting permission to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the St. Paul Police Department, Ramsey County and the Roseville Police Department to apply for this federal Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). If the grant is received, the Maplewood Police Department's share would be $14,000. There is no local match required. The St. Paul Police Department has taken on the administrative responsibilities for this grant, so there will be no administrative expense to the City. It is the intent of the Police Department to use this funding to bolster our Crime -Free Multi - Housing program. This funding will allow us to provide an organized and coordinated effort to attempt crime prevention in multiple dwelling complexes throughout the City. This agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney's office, and appropriate adjustments have been made to the agreement at their recommendation. Budget Impact There will be no cost to the City and a potential $14,000 grant for use by the Police Department. Recommendation It is recommended the City Council authorize the Police Department to enter into the Interlocal Agreement to apply for and accept grant money under the Justice Assistance Grant. Action Required Submit to the City Council for review and action. DJT:js GMS APPLICATION NUMBER 2005 -91702 -MN -IJ THE STATE OF MINNESOTA KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENT COUNTY OF RAMSEY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MAPLEWOOD, ROSEVILLE AND THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 2005 BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) PROGRAM AWARD This Agreement is made and entered into this 8th day of March, 2005, by and between the CITY of SAINT PAUL, MAPLEWOOD AND ROSEVILLE, acting by and through their governing bodies, their City Councils, hereinafter referred to respectively as "Saint Paul", "Maplewood" and "Roseville" and the COUNTY OF RAMSEY, acting by and through its governing body, the Commissioners of the County, hereinafter referred to as "Ramsey", all of Ramsey County, State of Minnesota, witnesseth: WHEREAS, this Agreement is made under the authority of the provision of Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, the Joint Powers Act; and WHEREAS, each governing body, in performing governmental functions or in paying for the performance of governmental functions hereunder, shall make that performance or those payments from current revenues legally available to that party; and WHEREAS, each governing body finds that the performance of this Agreement is in the best interests of all parties, that the undertaking will benefit the public, and that the division of costs fairly compensates the performing party for the services or functions under this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul agrees to provide the City of Maplewood $14,000, City of Roseville $12,000 and Ramsey County $145,652 from the JAG award for the Collaborative JAG Program; and WHEREAS, all parties believe it to be in their best interests to reallocate the JAG funds. GMS APPLICATION NUMBER 2005 -91720 -MN -IJ NOW THEREFORE, the Saint Paul, Maplewood, Roseville and Ramsey agree as follows: Section 1. Saint Paul agrees to pay Maplewood, Roseville and Ramsey a total of $171,652 of JAG funds as outlined above. Section 2. Maplewood, Roseville and Ramsey agrees to use $171,652 for the Collaborative JAG Program until September 30, 2008. Section 3. Nothing in the performance of this Agreement shall impose any liability for claims against Maplewood, Roseville and Ramsey other than claims for which liability may be imposed by the Minnesota Tort Claims Act. Section 4. Nothing in the performance of this Agreement shall impose any liability for claims against Saint Paul other than claims for which liability may be imposed by the Minnesota Tort Claims Act. Section 5. Each party to this Agreement will be responsible for its own actions in providing services under this Agreement and shall not be liable for any civil liability that may arise from the furnishing of the services by the other party. Section 6. The parties to this Agreement do not intend for any party not a signatory to the Agreement to obtain a right by virtue of this Agreement. Section 7. By entering into this Agreement, the parties do not intend to create any obligations express or 0) implied other than those set out herein; further, this Agreement shall not create any rights in any parry not a signatory hereto. GMS APPLICATION NUMBER 2005 -91702 -MN -IJ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Maplewood Police Department Chief APPROVED AS TO FORM: Maplewood City Attorney Maplewood Director of Financial Services Maplewood Mayor 3