HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-01-20 HPC Packet
MAPLEWOOD HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CITY HALL
January 20, 2011 - 7:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes
a. November 18, 2010
5 Chair Opening Statements/Presentations
6. Visitor Presentations
7. Old Business
a. Heritage Award - City Council Consider Authorization Funding
b. Certified Local Government Update - Discussion Only
8. New Business
a. Demolition Year End Report 2010
b. Heritage Preservation Commission 2010 Proposed Annual Report
c. Heritage Preservation Commission 2011 Goal Setting
9. Maplewood Area Historical Society Report
10. Commission Presentations
11. Staff Presentations
a. Election of Chair and Vice Chair
12. Adjournment
NOTE:
There may be a quorum of the Heritage Preservation Commissioners in attendance at the Maplewood Area Historical
Society monthly meeting February 9, 2011, at 7 p.m. The Maplewood Area Historical Society meetings are held at the
Bruentrup Heritage Farm, 2170 County Road D, Maplewood.
DRAFT MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 18,2010 -7:00 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chair Ron Cockriel at 7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Ron Cockriel, Vice Chair Richard Currie, Commissioners Caleb
Anderson, Lu Aurelius, Robert Creager, AI Galbraith, Staff Liaison Dave Fisher,
Recorder Lois Behm,
Absent: Commissioner Pete Boulay
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Richard requested addition of the Historical Society to the Agenda, and Ron suggested it
be placed before Commissioner Presentations on a regular basis.
Dave said it will be there in the future.
Lu moved approval of the Aqenda as amended, Caleb seconded. Aves - All
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Minutes of October 21,2010
Dave pointed out that in the "Approval of Minutes" the September meeting date should
be September 16, not September 21, in both the heading and the motion for approval.
Lu moved approval of the minutes of the October 21 meetinq as amended.
Richard seconded; Aves - AI, Caleb, Lu. Richard, and Robert.
Ron abstained due to his absence from the October meeting.
5. CHAIR OPENING STA TEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS
Ron stated that he feels he, as chairperson, failed by not getting the message across to
the Community Design Review Board and the City Council about the facing for the Frost
Avenue Bridge reconstruction. He feels there was a missed opportunity in that the City
of St. Paul ha,dobtained forms for relief panels on the bridge and Maplewood should
have been aole to 'piggy-back' on their work and rent or borrow the forms to use so the
Frost Avenue Bridge could again look like 'twins' as they did before recon-struction. If
successful the collaboration would have been a been an indication of success in
preservation. He said he feels it is ironic that the two cities collaborated on the
memorial for Sgt. Bergeron but could not do that to replicate the historic bridges built 80
years ago by the WPA, and hopes it can be done better for the next opportunity.
6. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS - None
7. OLD BUSINESS
a. Heritaqe Award - Commission Vote Results, Revote & Ballot to Revote
Dave said the ballot in the packet has the name of every nominee who received a vote
previously, and he feels a little discussion would be good, or if each commissioner would
say something about each them, giving a little background and possibly sway some
opinions and avoid a continuing deadlock as in the previous vote.
F:ichard suggested each commissioner vote for two rather than one of the nominees.
Lu moved to accept Richards suggestion to vote for two, Caleb seconded, Aves
- all
The ballots were distributed, marked and returned to Dave. After he and Lois each
checked the determined the total votes the Commissioners were told that 5th person on
the list was the winner. The award will be announced at a future meeting of the Council
when the honoree can be present.
Discussion followed about the plaque to be used. Dave said he had talked to three
different vendors and no one had a template for a maple leaf and it would be quite
expensive to have one made. Lu suggested checking with the Police Department
because they use that type of plaque for their awards. Dave said there are some
vendors he has not yet heard back from and will check with the Police Department.
Caleb offered to prepare the statement for the award presentation; his offer was
gratefully accepted by the Commission.
b. Certified Local Government Update - Discussion Onlv
Dave announced he has now received ail the Commissioners biographies and is
retyping some to reduce their size. The letter has been written and e-mailed to the
Mayor for his approval. He hopes to have that sent to the State before the end of the
year for their action and to complete one of the goals.
Ron commented that obtaining the CLG status will give the Commission better status
and possibly a little more clout for future projects.
Dave commented on some possible future projects for historic designation, specifically
the original Priory building and the Ski Jump. The goals will need to be worked on at the
next meeting.
8. NEW BUSINESS
a. December Meeting - Discussion Only
Dave announced that the council chambers will be undergoing some work during
December and meetings planned after 12/14 will have to be cancelled or rescheduled.
Richard moved to cancel the December meeting, AI seconded, Aves - All.
b. Thank You - Discussion Onlv
Dave said this item was on the Agenda at Richard's request because he asked if thank
you cards or notes were sent to people who were invited and came to speak at the
meetings. Dave said he had asked about other commissions and was surprised to learn
they never have, because it is a really good idea.
Discussion followed about the type of card and what it should say.
The consensus was that thank vou cards will be sent in the future.
8-1. HISTORICAL SOCIETY UPDATE
Richard announced that the Society's open house at the Bruentrup Farm will be Saturday
and Sunday, December 4th and 5th from 1 :00 - 4:00 p.m. and that the annual Member's
Potluck dinner will be at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 8 in place of the regular
monthly meeting.
The annual Holiday Tea will be on January 15th, with seatings at 11 :30 a.m. and 2:30
p.m., $25.00 per person and an Old Fashioned Quilting Bee March 19 at 10:00 a.m. and
2:00 p.m. He also listed other events through out the rest of 2011.
AI talked about the 45th parallel marker between the Bruce Vento trail and Frost Avenue
and said the bronze plaque was placed there by the Minnesota Geological Society, but
apparently has not been seen by anyone for years. He asked if anyone has any
information about what happened to it, the Commission would greatly appreciate hearing
about it.
9. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Lu shared a copy of the Ramsey County news magazine which covered Swede Hollow
and much of the East Side of St. Paul. Nothing yet about any of the suburbs.
Ron said he has received a couple of e-mails from Dave's staff about a gentleman who
lives in Little Canada near the Maplewood border where there is some excavation going
on. He had gone before the City Council and Planning Commission about some rocks,
petroglyphs, tools and possible artifacts from the area and e-mailed the information to
Ron because he is concerned about it and wanted the Commission to know. Ron looked
at it and doesn't feel he knows enough to make a judgement, so he forwarded it to people
at the Minnesota Historical Society for further study.
Also, he said the Woodbury Historical Society is hoping to establish a 'historical village'
which would contain a town hall, an old schoolhouse, an old barn and a couple of other
old buildings. They are looking for a site in Woodbury and he wishes them luck with that.
10. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
Dave asked for clarification about the kinds of demolitions that we are interested in
knowing about - he thinks we would not be interested in garages or sheds, but would want
to know about houses and businesses. Commissioners agreed with that assumption
and discussion followed about how the process is working. Dave mentioned that it is
possible to find pictures on line through Google's City View programs, although they are
not archived. He was able to print a copy pictures of the buildings, but could not
download the picture.
He will continue working on adjustments to the demolition permits, hoping to ensure that
pictures are taken before the buildings are taken down.
11. ADJOURNMENT - 8:10 p.m.
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
DATE:
James Antonen, City Manager
David Fisher, Building Official
Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager
Consider Authorizing Funding Maplewood Heritage Award
January 13, 2011, for the January 24, 2011, City Council Meeting
TO:
FROM:
INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) created The Heritage Maplewood Heritage
Award as part of their goals for 201 O. "The Maplewood Heritage Award is an annual award
recognizing an individual who has positively influenced our city's past or strengthened the
preservation of Maplewood history".
The award will be an annual award with the HPC nominating, voting and recommending the
recipient to the city council. The recipient will receive a plaque from the Maplewood City Council
and the individual's name will be engraved on a perpetuating plaque posted at city hall. The
annual cost for this award should not exceed $100. The cost in 2011 to purchase the
perpetuating plaque and the individual plaque should not exceed $500.
FUNDING
The funding would come from the city council program general fund (101-101).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the council support and authorize the funding for the annual Maplewood
Heritage Award.
P:HPC Award CC 1-24-2010 dgf
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
DATE:
James Antonen, City Manager
David Fisher, Building Official
Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager
Demolition Year End Report 2010
January 12, 2011, for the January 20, 2011 HPC Meeting
TO:
FROM:
INTRODUCTION
The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) has requested photos of demolished
building in 2010. The commission made this request to have a record of the buildings
that were demolished and provide comments of their historical significance in the city.
DISCUSSION
Listed below are demolished building from 2010:
2415 Cypress Street was a single-family dwelling that was built in 1998 and had
a fire in 2010.
1300 McKnight Road North did not have good records. The demolished building
was could have been built in the 60's. Feed Product built a new office building in
2010 at this location.
2580 and 2582 White Bear Avenue was two office buildings built in 1980. This is
where Goodwill is being built.
2158 Rice Street was a gas station built in 1967 as a Texaco.
223 Larpenteur Avenue was a gas station built in 1964 as a Shell.
The dates provided when these building were built came from the city building file
records. The city building file records have limited information about the properties and
building permits. There were no photo taken for 2415 Cypress Street and 1300 McKnight
Road North.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommendations the HPC review, comment and accept the demolition year end
report for 2010.
P:ICom-DevIHPC\ Goals\2011lDemolition Yearend Report 2010 dgf
Attachments:
1. Photo - 2582 White Bear Ave
2. Photo - 2158 Rice St
3. Photo - 223 Larpenteur Ave
Photo - 2582 White Bear Ave
Photo - 2158 Rice 8t
Photo - 223 Larpenteur Ave
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
DATE:
James Antonen, City Manager
David Fisher, Building Official
Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager
Heritage Preservation Commission 2010 Proposed Annual Report
January 10, 2011 for the January 20, 2011 HPC Meeting
TO:
FROM:
INTRODUCTION
The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) ordinance requires an annual report to the city
council. The annual report outlines the actions and activities taken by the commission during the
preceding year. The annual report is reviewed and approved by the city council. The following is
proposed content for the HPC's annual report which will update the city council on the
commission's actions for the 2010 calendar year.
PROPOSED 2010 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENT
Members
The HPC consists of seven members appointed by the city council. Membership terms are for
three years, with extensions for additional terms approved by the city council.
On April 26, 2010, the city council approved a resolution that changed the term expiration dates for
some commission and board members. A change to the HPC ordinance was needed in order to
allow the council to change the date the terms expire. On June 28, 2010, the city council approved
amendments to the ordinance that included the re-appointment of seven commissioners to the
HPC. Commissioners Creager, Aurelius, Currie, Cockriel, Galbraith, Boulay and Anderson were
re-appointed to one, two and three year terms according to seniority to ensure staggering of term
expiration dates.
The current HPC members and terms are as follows:
Commissioner
Membership Beqan
Reappointment
Term Expires
Robert Creager
Lucille Aurelius
Richard Currie (Vice Chair)
Ron Cockriel (Chair)
AI Galbraith
Peter Boulay
Caleb Anderson
7-26-04
7-26-04
7-26-04
8-28-06
8-28-06
10-9-06
2-25-08
6-28-10
6-28-10
6-28-10
6-28-10
6-28-10
6-28-10
6-28-10
4-30-13
4-30-13
4-30-13
4-30-12
4-30-12
4-30-11
4-30-11
Meetinqs
The HPC's regularly scheduled meetings are the third Thursday of every month at 7:00 p.m. In
2010 the HPC held 10 meetings.
Reviews and Accomplishments
1. Amended the HPC ordinance.
2. Submitted to the Minnesota State Historical Society Office for Certified Local Government
Status.
3. Educated Maplewood citizens by participating in events at the Bruentrup Heritage Farm,
identifying publications about Maplewood's history at the Ramsey County Library and
adding links to the City's website from the State and County Historical Societies.
4. Repaired the Gladstone informational kiosk and sign.
5. Worked on identifying and recognizing historic families.
6. Worked on identifying and recognizing the history of geographic features such as lakes and
site, etc.
7. Created the Maplewood Heritage Award. The Maplewood Heritage Award is an annual
award recognizing an individual who has positively influenced our city's past or strengthen
the preservation of Maplewood history.
8. Had the following guest speakers come to the HPC meetings and give historical
presentation:
1. Burton Murdock
2. George Rossbach
3. Leo Capeder
9. Recognized the following demolished buildings in 2010:
1. 2415 Cypress St - Dwelling
2. 1300 McKnight Rd - Office Building
3. 2582 White Bear Ave - Office Building
4. 2158 Rice St - Gas Station
5. 223 Larpenteur Ave - Gas Station
10. Reviewed following development proposals for historical preservation issues:
1. Keller Golf Course Project
2. Bruentrup Heritage Farm Minor Project and Master Plan
3. Frost Avenue Bridge
4. The Shores at Lake Phalen
11. Worked collaboratively with the Maplewood Area Historical Society.
Outside Activities
Several HPC members are also members of the Maplewood Area Historical Society. These HPC
members worked collaboratively on several society events such as:
.
Spring Tea - Bruentrup Heritage Farm
Ice Cream Social- Bruentrup Heritage Farm
Ramsey County Fair
.
.
2
. Johnny Appleseed Days - Bruentrup Heritage Farm
. Halloween Hoedown - Maplewood Community Center
. Barn Dance - Bruentrup Heritage Farm
. Cemetery Tour - Forest Lawn Cemetery
. Quilting Bee - Bruentrup Heritage Farm
Conclusion
The Maplewood Heritage Preservation Commission is committed to promoting the use and
conservation of historic properties for the education, inspiration, pleasure and enrichment of the
citizens of this area.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the HPC review the language proposed for the 2010 Heritage Preservation
Commission annual report and give comments and feedback. Provide staff with direction to revise
or approve the 2010 annual report.
P:HPC 2010 Historical Preservation Commission Annual Report Mdgf
3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
James Antonen, City Manager
David Fisher, Building Official
Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager
Heritage Preservation Commission 2011 Goal Setting
January 10, 2011, for the January 20, 2011 HPC Meeting
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) needs to set goals for 2011. In 2010 the
HPC reviewed the 2030 comprehensive plan historical resources chapter 9 and the long-
term heritage preservation goals that the city hopes to achieve over the next 10 to 20
years. The purpose of yearly goal setting is to review those goals and determine which
goals can be accomplished over the next year.
DISCUSSION
The four goals listed below are continued goals from 2010:
1. Continue all necessary measures for the Certified Local Government (CLG)
status by maintaining a historical site survey and providing all the documentation
required to the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office.
2. Submit a nomination to the city council for the Maplewood Heritage Award for
2010 and 2011. "The Maplewood Heritage Award is an annual award
recognizing an individual who has positively influenced our city's past or
strengthen the preservation of Maplewood history".
3. Continue to identify and recognize historic families.
4. Continue to identify and recognize the history of geographic features such as
lakes, etc.
In addition, the memorandum from 2010's goais and the HPC ordinance are provided for
your reference.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the HPC discuss and prioritize their goals to achieve in 2011.
P:ICom-DevIHPCI GoalslGoal Setting Jan 11 2011 dgf
Attachments:
1 .2030 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 9: Historical Resources
2. The memorandum from 2010's goals
3. HPC Ordinance
Attachment 1
Chapter 9: Historical Resources
Introduction
Maplewood was incorporated in 1957. Before that, it was the townships of New Canada and McLean, which were
founded 99 years earlier in 1858 when the Minnesota Territory became a state. Historical Resources are defined as
properties and structures of historical significance and importance as well as archeological sites and elements of
cultural and traditional importance. These resources contribute to the City by providing information about its past.
They provide evidence of the way Maplewood was settled and contributions people made to our society. They also
provide insight into the values that formed Maplewood.
Preserving historic sites and resources benefits the City, both economically and socially. Historic preservation goes
beyond the primary concern of understanding the significance of historic and cultural resources. It also focuses on
integrating historic preservation into the broader planning and decision-making arena, so it can be relevant to social
and economic concerns.
The Maplewood Comprehensive Plan will, among other things:
. Guide future growth and development in an orderly manner.
. Define the proper functional relationships between different types of land uses.
. Help to coordinate public and private sector decisions.
. Establish a framework to guide and involve citizen participation in City government.
. Provide for a sense of community and neighborhood identity.
These goals can be supported by an effective Historical Resources Plan. The plan can also be supported by citizens
and decision-makers who use the guidance of this chapter to preserve historic, cultural, and archeological resources
in Maplewood.
Purpose
This Historical Resources Plan supports and interrelates with all elements, goals, and objectives of the
comprehensive plan. The purpose of the Historical Resources Plan is to:
. Guide the City in a comprehensive program of hisloric preservation and historic resource management.
. Describe the existing historic resources and historic preservation activities in Maplewood.
. Evaluate the historic preservation and historic resources needs of Maplewood's residents, as may be
determined by the Historical Preservation Commission, and to set standards for measuring the meeting
of those needs.
. Promote the use and conservation of historic properties in Maplewood for the education, inspiration,
pleasure, and enrichment of area citizens.
. Plan for adequate support and understanding of the historic resources in Maplewood.
. Designate the goals, objectives and actions that Maplewood will use to help preserve the historic
resources in the city.
Historical Resources
9-1
Discussion, Challenges and Issues
Maplewood began to be settled by European descents more than 150 years ago. The City is interested in identifying
its historic resources. The Historic Preservation Commission will be challenged in this task because of:
. The aging of our citizens who have knowledge of historic places.
. The limits in public funding to support historic preservation programs.
. The development or redevelopment of sites that might have historic resources.
. The current lack of a program which encourages historical interest and private owner acceptance of
properties that have historic resources.
There are opportunities available, however. Maplewood could build on these opportunities to develop a program to
help preserve the City's heritage. These opportunities include:
. Completing an inventory of historic resources in Maplewood and setting priorities of importance.
. Working with knowledgeable preservation-oriented organizations. Working with county, state, and
federal agencies that have knowledge of historic resources and programs.
The Metropolitan Council's "Local Planning Handbook" has several suggested guidelines for an historic preservation
plan. These include standards for establishing a Heritage Preservation Commission and practices to follow. The
Handbook also recommends following the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and
Historic Preservation which include standards for preservation planning and guidelines and activities for a
preservation-planning program.
Standards for Preservation Planninq
o Historic Co ntexts
1. Decisions about historic properties are most reliably made when the relationship of
individual properties to other similar properties is understood. Information about historic
properties which represent aspects of history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and
culture must be collected and organized to define these relationships. This organizational
framework is called a "historic context." The historic context organizes information
based on a cultural theme and its geographical and chronological limits. Contexts
describe the significant broad patterns of development in an area that may be represented
by historic properties. The development of historic contexts is the foundation for decisions
about identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment of historic properties.
2. Develop goals, objectives, and priorities for the identification, registration, and treatment
of historic properties. This task should be pursued by the City, the Historical Preservation
Commission, and the Maplewood Area Historical Society after the City Council adopts this
plan.
Historical Resources
9-2
Guidelines and Activities for a Preservation Planninq Proqram
o These guidelines are to include a development of Historic Contexts. A comprehensive summary of
Maplewood's history can be created by developing a set of historic contexts that will include all
significant historic and cultural properties and sites in the City. Maplewood should coordinate any
efforts with the State Historic Preservation Office since it generally has the most complete
information and is usually in the best position to advise and assist the City in matters of historical
importance.
o Once the City and the Historical Preservation Commission or the Maplewood Area Historical
Society has finished the inventory of Heritage Resources, they should be organized into historic
contexts. This organization should be based on a cultural theme, geography and chronology.
o The designation of Maplewood Heritage Landmarks should be given to those historically or
culturally significant objects, slructure, buildings, sites and districts in the City. To be designated a
heritage landmark; a property must meet specific criteria for determining historical significance.
Besides local registration, certain properties may qualify for nomination to the National Register of
Historic Places. Properties on the National Register are recognized for their historical significance.
The creation of a register for significant historical properties is a critical step in planning historic
preservation. Conflicts between Maplewood's requirements and standards for historic preservation
and those of the state or federal government shall be decided by the City Council.
o Maplewood is eligible to apply to the State Historical Preservation Office to be a Certified Local
Government (CLG). After joining, Maplewood would be able to participate in the CLG preservation
partnership that the National Historic Preservation Act established. Federal funding is available
through a grants-in-aid-program to finance activities such as the local inventory of historic
resources, historic preservation planning and education.
Historical Resources
9-3
Historic Preservation Goals
1. Support the protection of the City's heritage by preserving, protecting, conserving, and wisely using the
significant historical, cultural, architectural, or archeological objects, structures, buildings, sites,
resources and districts in the City.
2. Encourage community identity and civic pride by preserving and protecting historic properties,
structures, sites and resources in Maplewood.
3. Develop a historic preservation program and integrate the program with other planning programs in the
City.
4. Establish a comprehensive framework for all decisions and actions related to historic preservation.
5. Encourage broad citizen participation in historic preservation, in order to obtain the knowledge, insights,
and support of City residents.
6. Write a historic resources management plan and submit to City Council for approval.
Historic Preservation Objectives
1. The Historical Preservation Commission will advise, assist and make recommendations to the City Council,
about historic preservation and resource matters.
2. Maplewood will implement the historic preservation goals and objectives by linking and integrating with other
City programs and activities. This includes, but is not limited to, planning, zoning, code enforcement,
housing, economic development and public works as appropriate.
3. Maplewood will work with county, state and federal agencies and other organizations, including the State
Historic Preservation Office of the Minnesota Historical Society on preservation issues.
4. Maplewood will work with the Historical Preservation Commission to identity, document, and evaluate the
historical significance of objects, structures, buildings, sites and resources.
5. Maplewood will protect, preserve, and enhance significant heritage resources in the City by designating
them as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks. The City will also nominate appropriate sites to the National
Register of Historic Places.
6. Maplewood will have the Historical Preservation Commission, with assistance from City Staff, prepare and
maintain the Maplewood Heritage Resources Inventory.
7. In cooperation with City Staff and the Maplewood Planning Commission, the Historicai Preservation
Commission may comment on all development proposals that would affect properties on the historic
properties list.
8. Maplewood may issue permits or approve development plans that include conditions for historic
preservation, based upon the recommendations of the Historical Preservation Commission.
9. Maplewood supports research, community awareness and public education on the value and importance of
preservation, protection, and the use of heritage resources in the City.
10. Maplewood encourages the establishment of an accessible location where historic documents and artifacts
can be stored and protected.
Historical Resources
9-4
11. Maplewood supports the use of all financial sources and opportunities to support further historic
preservation efforts.
12. Maplewood supports the incorporation of local history into present development by using historic names for
streets, parks and geographical features.
Historic Preservation Action Plan
The following is a list of activities that the City should follow in the coming years to carry out the goals and objectives
of the Historic Resources Plan. The City will periodically review and update this list.
1. Adopt and implement a historic resources management plan. (Historical Preservation Commission and City
staff will provide recommendation of plan to the City CounciL)
2. Advise, assist, and make recommendations about historic preservation and resources issues. (Historical
Preservation Commission will provide recommendations to the City CounciL)
3. Identify, document, evaluate and maintain an inventory of historically significant objects, structures,
buildings, sites, resources and districts in Maplewood. (Historical Preservation Commission will provide
recommendations to the City CounciL)
4. Complete a preservation planning report before the City Council designates a property as a Maplewood
Heritage Landmark. (Historical Preservation Commission will provide recommendations to the City CounciL)
5. Issue a finding of significance for individual objects, structures, buildings, sites, resources and districts to
determine whether they are eligible for designation as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks. (Historical
Preservation Commission will provide recommendation to the City CounciL)
6. Designate significant historic or cultural properties or resources as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks and
nominate appropriate properties or resources for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
(Historical Preservation Commission will provide recommendation to the City CounciL)
7. Place properties designated as Maplewood Heritage Landmarks on the official Maplewood Zoning Map, or
on another map specifically created for this purpose. (Historical Preservation Commission will recommend
to City staff.)
8. Use and follow the Secretary of Interior's standards and guidelines:
a. When advising the owners of historic properties about maintenance and restoration work.
(Historical Preservation Commission and City staff will provide recommendations to the City
CounciL)
b. For design review decisions about Heritage Landmarks and Historically Significant Structures and
for archeology and historic preservation. (Historical Preservation Commission and City staff will
provide recommendations to the City CounciL)
g. Review City ordinances and amend them as needed to reflect the goals and objectives for historic
preservation. (Historical Preservation Commission and City staff will provide recommendations to the City
CounciL)
Historical Resources
9-5
10. Establish a program for the placement of local historical markers and plaques that identifies and informs the
public about historic sites. (Historical Preservation Commission will provide recommendations to the City
Council.)
11. Provide information and education about historic preservation and properties, sites or resources that are
historically or culturally significant to property owners and the general public. (Historical Preservation
Commission will provide recommendation to the City CounciL)
12. Participate in education and communication programs to increase the visibility and understanding of the
City's historic resources. (Historical Preservation Commission will provide recommendations to the City
CounciL)
13. Advise schools and teachers in the development of curricula and teaching aids about history and historic
preservation in Maplewood. (Historical Preservation Commission will provide recommendations to the City
CounciL)
14. Incorporate local history into present development by using historic names for streets, parks and
geographical features. (Historical Preservation Commission will provide recommendations to the City
CounciL)
15. Comment on all development proposals that would affect properties on the historic properties list.
(Recommendations made to City Council by the Historical Preservation Commission, in cooperation with
City staff and the Maplewood Planning Commission.)
16. Review all applications or permits for the demolition, moving, or remodeling of Heritage Landmarks or
Historically Significant Structures in Maplewood to determine the possible impacts on significant heritage
resources. (Historical Preservation Commission will provide recommendation to the City CounciL)
17. Work with and encourage property owners to help preserve the heritage resource value and historical
integrity of significant historical or cultural resources. (Historical Preservation Commission and City staff will
provide recommendation to the City Council.)
18. Encourage property owners to meet historic preservation standards and guidelines when working on historic
properties. (To be done by City staff.)
19. Work with the Historical Preservation Commission to apply to the State Historical Preservation Office for
certification as a Certified Local Government (CLG). (To be done by City staff.)
20. Seek outside funding sources and participate where feasible on historic preservation projects. (Historical
Preservation Commission and City staff will provide recommendations to the City CounciL)
21. Work with County, the State Historic Preservation Office of the Minnesota Historical Society and Federal
agencies when implementing this plan. (To be done by City staff.)
22. Research and identify the origin of historic names; such as family names, geological marker names, lake
names, etc. (To be done by the Historical Preservation Commission, in cooperation with City staff)
23. Create criteria for Maplewood Heritage Award program where places or people would be recognized for
their historical contributions. (Historical Preservation Commission and City staff will provide
recommendations to the City CounciL)
Historical Resources
9-6
Attachment 2
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Jarnes Antonen, City Manager
David Fisher, Building Official
DuWayne Konewko, Community Development & Parks Director
Historical Preservation Commission 2010 Goals
February 22,2010, for the March 8, 2010 CC Meeting
TO:
FROM:
INTRODUCTION
On February 18, 2010, the Historical Preservation Commission (HPC) established their goals for
2010. The commission prioritized them as follows:
To guide them in setting these goals, the HPC referred to the Historical Resources Chapter in
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and to the Historical Preservation Commission Ordinance
statement of public policy and purpose.
Goals
1. Continue to take all necessary measures to obtain Certified Local Government (CLG)
status:
a. Continue a historical site survey.
b. Complete the HPC ordinance amendments - to ensure HPC has oversight of
historical sites and that there is a public process in place when dealing with these
sites
c. Apply to the State Historical Society for CLG status.
2. Continue education of history through events, publications and web.
3. Repair of Gladstone informational kiosk.
4. Continue to identify and recognize historic families.
5. Continue to identify and recognize the history of geographic features such as lakes,
landscapes, etc.
6. Create Heritage Award and develop criteria for awarding people or places for their work
in the field of history or for their historic character.
7. Continue to add links to the city website from the Maplewood Area Historical Society,
Minnesota State Historical Society and other public websites.
8. Have guest speaker from a historical site give historical presentation to the commission.
9. Identify books, articles and media about Maplewood. Work with the Maplewood Library
to provide the books, articles and media to the public.
10. Review photo of demolished buildings throughout the year and make it part of the HPC's
annual report.
11. Continue to promote, collaborate and work with the Maplewood Area Historical Society
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Historical Preservation Commission 2010 goals.
P:HPC 2010 Goal for cc 3-8-10 dgf
2
Attachment 3
AMENDMENT ORDINANCE 905
THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION ORDINANCE
Section 1 This amendment revises Sections 2-87 to 2-91
DIVISION 4 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION ("Commission")
Section 2-87 Authority for Establishment
There is hereby established for the City a Heritage Preservation Commission as an
independent commission to the City Council, as provided in Minnesota Statutes Annotated
Sections 471.193 and 13851
Section 2-88 Statement of public policy and purpose
The City Council hereby declares as a matter of public policy that the protection,
preservation, perpetuation and use of places, areas, buildings, structures and other objects
having a special historical, community or aesthetic interest or value is a public necessity and is
required in the interest of the people. The purpose of this Chapter is to:
(a) Safeguard the cultural resources of the City by preserving sites, structures, districts and
landmarks which refiect elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political or
architectural history;
(b) Protect and enhance the City's attractions to residents and visitors;
(c) Foster civic pride in the beauty and notable achievements of the past;
(d) Enhance the visual and aesthetic character, diversity and interest of the City; and
(e) Promote the use and preservation of historic sites and landmarks for the education and
general welfare of the people of the City.
Section 2-89 Advisory body
All actions of the Commission shall be in the nature of recommendations to the City Council,
and said Commission shall have no final authority with reference to any matters, except as the
Council may lawfully delegate authority to it.
Section 2-90 Composition; Appointment; Qualifications; Terms
(a) The Heritage Commission shall be composed of seven (7) members appointed by the
City Council, who shall be residents of the City, and shall be selected to assure that the
Commission is representative of the various areas of the City and responsive to the needs of
the people.
f!ll Commission membership shall be drawn from persons with demonstrated interest and/or
expertise in historic preservation. If available in the community, at least two members of the
Commission shall be heritage preservation-related professionals (e.g. the professions of history,
architecture, architectural history, archeology, planning, real estate, design, building trades,
landscape architecture, or law). A member of the Maplewood Heritage Preservation
Commission is required to be a representative to the Ramsey County Historical Society. The
City shall pay for the membership of the Commission or designee.
(c) The members of the heritage preservation commission shall serve staggered terms. All
appointments shall be assigned by the city council for a term of three years.
Section 2-91 Officers Generally
The chairperson and vice-chairperson of the Commission shall be elected by the
Commission at the first meeting in January of each year from among the members of the
Commission. The Chairperson shall be responsible for calling and presiding over all meetings
and shall be entitled to an equal vote with other members of the Commission. If the
Chairperson is unable to attend a meeting, the vice-chairperson shall conduct the meeting.
Section 2-92 Designation of historic sites and landmarks
(a) Procedures: The City Council, upon the request of the Commission, may by resolution
designate an historic site, landmark, or district. Prior to such designation, the city council shall
hold a public hearing, notice of which shall be published at least ten (10) days prior to the date
of the hearing. Notice of the hearing shall also be mailed to all owners of property which is
proposed to be designated as an historic site, landmark or district and to all property owners
within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of the area to be designated. Every nomination
shall be forwarded to the Minnesota Historical Society for review and comment within sixty (60)
days of the Commission's request.
(b) Eligibility criteria: In considering the designation of any area, site, place, district, building
or structure in the city as an historic site, landmark, or district the Commission shall consider the
following factors with respect to eligibility:
(1) Its character, interest or value as part of the history or cultural heritage of the
City, the State or the United States;
(2) Its association with persons or events that have made a significant contribution to
the cultural heritage of the City;
(3) Its potential to yield information important in history or prehistory;
(4) Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of architectural type or style, or
elements of design, detail materials or craftsmanship; and
(5) Its unique location or singular physical appearance representing an established
or familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or community of the City.
Section 2-93 Alterations to landmarks, sites or districts; review
(a) Review and recommendations generally: The Commission shall review and make
recommendations to the Council concerning proposed alterations to an historic site, landmark or
district.
(b) Land use permit: Every application for a li'lnd use permit which may result in the
alteration of a designated historic site, landmark or district in the City shall be reviewed by the
Commission; thereafter, the Commission shall make a recommendation and may recommend
conditions regarding approval to the City Council concerning the proposed permit.
(c) Other building permits: The Commission shall review and make recommendations to
the Council concerning the issuance of building permits to do any of the following in a historic
district or State designated historic site:
(1) New construction - New building or new addition to an existing building
(2) Remodel - Alter, change or modify building or site
(3) Move a building - Building or structure moved into the city.
(4) Excavation - Dig out materials from the ground.
(5) Demolition - Destroy, remove or raze - completely tear down
(d) Factors considered: The Commission, upon receipt of the permit application and plans,
shall determine if the work to be performed adversely affects the designated historic site,
landmark or district. In determining whether or not there is an adverse effect to the historic site,
landmark, or district the Commission shall consider the following factors:
(1) Whether the work will significantly alter the appearance of the building or
structure so as to remove the features which distinguish the historic site, landmark or district as
a significant cultural resource.
(2) Whether. the use of the property will destroy, disturb or endanger a known or
suspected archaeological feature site.
(e) Standards and guidelines: The Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City shall be the
authoritative guide to reviewing permits in relation to designated historic sites, landmarks and
historic districts.
(f) Appeals: Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Commission shall within ten (10)
days of the Commission's action recommending denying the issuance of a building permit within
a historic district have a right to appeal such decision to the City Council. The Commission in
recommending denial of a building permit shall advise the applicant of his/her right to appeal to
the City Council. The aggrieved party shall file with the Building Official a written notice
requesting Council review of the action taken by the Commission.
Section 2-94 Maintenance of records and documents
The Commission shall conduct a continuing survey of cultural resources in the City
which the Commission has reason to believe are or will be eligible for designation as historic
sites, landmarks or districts. The Commission shall also prepare and maintain a Comprehensive
map and survey.
(a) Register of Historic Sites and Landmarks: The City shall maintain a register of historic
sites and landmarks.
(b) Repository for Documents: The office of the Building Official is designated as the
repository for all studies, surveys, reports, programs, and designations of historic sites and
landmarks.
Section 2-95 Violation
It shall be a misdemeanor to alter, disturb, deface or materially change the appearance or use
of a designated historic site, landmark, or district without a permit.
This Historical Preservation Commission recommended approval of this ordinance.
This ordinance shali take effect after pubiishing in the official
Council approved this ordinance on June 28, 2010.
Attest:
__K. u. / C, Cou . ~
Kal~le: City 'f~