HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-11-15 ENR Packet
AGENDA
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION
Monday, November 15, 2010
7 p.m.
Council Chambers - Maplewood City Hall
1830 County Road BEast
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes: October 18, 2010
5. New Business
a. Emerald Ash Borer Plan
b. Annual Sustainability Report
6. Unfinished Business
7. Visitor Presentations
8. Commission Presentations
a. Subcommittee Reports
1) Collection System Analysis
2) Neighborhood Environmental Groups
3) Greenways
9. Staff Presentations
a. Update on Recycling Contract
b. Reschedule or Cancel December 20,2010, ENR Commission Meeting (due to
city council chamber camera and sound upgrades beginning December 15)
c. Maplewood Nature Center Programs
10. Adjourn
Agenda Item 4
MINUTES
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
7:00 p.m., Monday, October 18, 2010
Council Chambers, City Hall
1830 County Road BEast
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Trippler called the meeting of the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission to
order at 7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Dale Trippler, Chair
Randee Edmundson, Commissioner
Judith Johannessen, Commissioner
Carole Lynne, Commissioner
Carol Mason Sherrill, Commissioner
Bill Schreiner, Commissioner
Ginny Yingling, Commissioner
Present
Present
Absent
Ab~!!Cnt (Leave of Absence)
~[~S:ent
Present
Present)).>
Staff Present
Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner
'<V;>
3.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
';0'
^"'" wW' ^W,
.s>' ;y '\<
Commissioner Schreiner moved to approve the aQenda as submitted.
Seconded by Commissio
Sl1errill.
Ayes - All
The motion passed.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approval of September 20,2010, Environmental and Natural Resources Commission
Meeting Minutes.
Commissioner Trippler had a revision to page 4, item 6. A. 3. It should read "Terminology was
standardized to include references to only commercial and residential turbines, not
noncommercial or micro/macro."
Commissioner Yingling moved to approve the September 20 . 2010. Environmental and Natural
Resources Commission MeetinQ Minutes as amended.
Seconded by Commissioner Edmundson.
Ayes - Chair Trippler,
Commissioners Edmundson,
Mason Sherrill & Yingling
Abstention - Commissioner Schreiner
The motion passed.
October 18, 2010
Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Meeting Minutes
1
5. NEW BUSINESS
None.
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Renewable Energy Ordinance
Environmental Planner, Shann Finwall gave the Renewable Energy Ordinance report and
answered questions of the commission.
The commission discussed the ordinance and offered feedback as follows:
.""'"
Commissioner Yingling said most bird and b~tmQJiality studies are done on large wind
turbine farms. The research shows somewhere between three to five birds and bats are
["CO' """
killed per wind turbine structure. There are'about 1 ,30,0 commercial wind turbines which
would equal about 7,500 birds and batg:'thal.:gie. Thos@numbers may be off by as much
as 50% so there may be more like,JO,00015jfds and bats that are killed due to wind
turbines. Comparatively, in the stateQj \iViscQnsin cats kill 39 million birds a year. The
turbines the city is considering are'l]ot\6emajor source of bird and bat mortality rates, so
any restrictions due to thiscOn<:ern need to be evaluated carefully. The DNR had
recommended large setJ?FlCks qn wetlands, especially wetlands used by waterfowl. The
DNR recommends that Vitlqqtl.ii'bine~should be placed 1,400 to 1,600 ft away from bodies
of water and foresl,lildglil~,. Hq'Never these should be significant bodies of water and
significant forest.,edges. ,,'
''<1::.: '::E
Staff will make the notlild <:tiilnges and invite representatives of the DNR to review the
ordinance and requesftl1'eir presence at an upcoming meeting to discuss their review and
suggestions on the ordinance.
7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None.
8. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
a. Subcommittee Reports
Greenways - Environmental Planner, Shann Finwall said there was limited staff time to
work on this goal during the year, so not much movement has been made except for
designating the Priory as the Greenway the city should initially focus on. There are
several projects that are planned in the Priory Greenway in 2011 that the ENR
Commission can spotlight.
Trash Hauling - Commissioner Trippler reported on the October 4 Special City Council
meeting which was held to take public testimony on the city's review of our current trash
hauling system, There were approximately 150 people who attended, with 40 some
October 18, 2010
Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Meeting Minutes
2
people speaking to the matter. The city council will continue the discussion during a
workshop scheduled for November 15 at 5:15 p.m.
Neighborhood Environmental Groups - Commissioner Mason Sherrill stated there will be
an Energy Efficiency Workshop at the Maplewood Community Center from 6:30 p. m. to
7:30 p.m. on October 19, 2010. The Neighborhood Environmental Group subcommittee is
sponsoring the free workshop, which is being conducted by the Metro Clean Energy
Resource Team and Xcel Energy. There will be tips shared on how to save and reduce
energy in your home.
9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
a. Update on Recycling Proposals
Ms. Finwall stated the city council directed staff to begin contract negotiations with Tennis
Sanitation. Staff hopes to bring the contract to the City Council on November 8, 2010.
Ms. Finwall thanked the commission for all their hard work on the RFP process and asked
if there were any comments regarding the council's decision.
Chair Trippler said he felt the city council was focljsing in on the "price" and the council
decided to approve Tennis Sanitation rather thartfihe Environmental and Natural
Resources Commission's recommendation tRIg' ith Eureka Recycling.
/:"".
Commissioner Edmundson said her big.<(Oncern was"!he contract accountability, making
sure the city has access to records of w65:r~things are'being recycled and that the
companies are actually recycling tpe items;"I'She asked if they are willing to hire a third
company to provide that accountal511ity,and"dQc;umentation. Commissioner Edmundson
said you don't get "somethingfor hqthirygrr:tll1e'value of having a recycling company that
holds themselves account<lble,<lnd makes sure their customer has access to that is
critical. Why recycle if theitiing~ you'~re recycling never actually get recycled. You don't
want to pay for a service'tQl'1pify1sngf'getting. The city has to hold Tennis Sanitation
accountable. She ~tateQ'Nnel]she called Eureka Recycling she could find out exactly
"where" her recyc;[ed gooi:l$were going and "how" they were being recycled. As a
consumer you stlOQ,ld havell;lw3ss to that information. If the recycling isn't recycled with
the highest quality shl?,wil.11ake her recycled goods to another location to be processed
properly. "'" ,
Commissioner Mason Sherrill shared her disappointment in the city council's decision to
choose Tennis Sanitation as the city's new recycling contractor. The commission spent a
considerable amount of time working on the RFP, listening to the contractor presentations,
and designing the rating system. The commission stressed there were things that were
very important to commission such as the dual sort system, the residuals, the education
piece, and the accountability. She personally felt they spent a lot of time on this and the
advice the commission gave to the city council was disregarded. It was disappointing that
it boiled down to money. Ilis true - you get what you pay for. She hopes Tennis
Sanitation fulfills the contract and that the city is pleased. She said she is going to feel
bad when she places her recycling all together rather than having it individually sorted so
there is less cross contamination.
Chair Trippler said there should be an escape clause in the contract so if Tennis
Sanitation isn't fulfilling the terms of the contract the city has the right to void the contract
and go with another company.
Ms. Finwall said staff is proposing a yearly performance review with the ENR Commission
and the city council to ensure Tennis Sanitation is meeting the performance standards.
October 18,2010
Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Meeting Minutes
3
b. Update on Chicken Ordinance
Environmental Planner, Shann Finwall stated the ENR commission recommended
approval of this ordinance to have up to 10 chickens with a permit in a residential zoning
district. After the two planning commission meetings the ordinance was denied by a vote
of 4-3. Staff is proposing to bring the ordinance to the city council during a workshop and
would request that those residents who support the ordinance to attend.
c. Maplewood Nature Center Programs
Ms. Finwall said Saturday, October 30, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. there is a Buckthorn Battle
sponsored by the Ramsey Watershed District, City of North St. Paul, City of Oakdale and
the Maplewood Environmental and Natural Resources Commission at Silver Lake Joy
Park. There are a lot of improvements made at Joy Park such as a new fishing pier, new
plantings and a trail. If you are interested in helping out with this Ginny Gaynor,
Maplewood's Natural Resources Coordinator is coordinating this.
10. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Trippler adjourned the meeting at 8:05 p.m.
October 18, 2010
Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Meeting Minutes
4
Agenda Itern 5.a.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Environmental and Natural Resources(ENR) Cornmission
Ginny Gaynor, Natural Resources Coordinator
Emerald Ash Borer Plan
November 5, 2010 for November 15, 2010 Commission Meeting
INTRODUCTION
In Spring 2009, emerald ash borer (EAB) was discovered in St. Paul, Minnesota. In early 2010, EAB
was found in Minneapolis and in Houston County, Minnesota. Communities throughout Minnesota are
developing strategies to manage this pest.
DISCUSSION
Emerald ash borer is a non-native beetle that causes widespread decline and death of ash trees. The
larval stage of EAB feeds on the tissue between the bark and the sapwood, disrupting the transport of
nutrients and water in the tree. EAB has destroyed millions of ash trees in other states. In 2009, EAB
was found in St. Paul, MN. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources, and University of Minnesota have been leading the response to EAB in our area.
They have provided information on their websites, presented workshops, and prepared a Community
EAB Preparedness Manual to help communities plan for this pest. Attachment 1 provides several
website resources, including the Community Preparedness Manual.
An EAB Preparedness and Response Plan outlines a municipality's objective and the approaches it
will use to respond to an EAB infestation. If EAB is as destructive here as it has been elsewhere,
Maplewood could lose hundreds of trees and face enormous costs for removal and replanting. There
are chemical controls for EAB and Minnesota is testing biological control in Houston County. The city
has contracted our city forester, Andy Hovland, to work with staff and commissions to develop a plan
to manage EAB. The planning process and schedule is:
Summer/Fall 2010 - Conduct tree inventories to gather data
October 2010 - Presentation and discussion with Parks Commission (public invited)
November 2010 - Presentation and discussion with Environmental and Natural Resources
Commission (public invited)
November 2010 - City forester and staff draft the plan
Dec/Jan 2010 - Parks and ENR commission review EAB plan and make recommendations
Early 2011 - Council reviews plim
To develop a realistic EAB plan, it is essential to have an estimate of the number of ash trees in the
city. Earlier this year, the city hired S&S Specialists to conduct an inventory of trees in manicured
areas of parks. Of the 2207 park trees, 487 (19.4%) are ash trees. Staff has begun to inventory a
sampling of boulevard trees and will complete the sampling in 2011.
At the November 2010 ENR Commission meeting, Mr. Hovland and staff will present background
information on EAB. Attachments 2 and 3 contain basic information on EAB. Staff is seeking
commissioners input on management options for EAB including:
1. Should the city approach be do nothing (remove ash when they die)?
2. Should the plan include some structured removal of ash trees before they die?
3. Should the city consider insecticide use for some ash trees?
4. Should the plan include replanting trees lost to EAB?
Attachment 4 provides information on insecticide options for EAB. The insecticides available are not
specific to EAB-they will harm other insects and animals as well. Application methods include foliar
and bark sprays, soil drench or soil injection, and trunk injection. Trunk injection is a more targeted
approach and less likely to affect water bodies. The two EAB insecticides most widely used by
arborists are imidacloprid and emamectin benzoate. Material Safety Data Sheets are attached for two
products that use these active ingredient: Xytect 2F and Tree-age (Attachments 5 and 6). This
information is included for commissioners who want detailed information on toxicity-at this meeting
we will not discuss what product the city should choose if it decides to use chemical treatment.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests that the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission reviews the information
provided and discusses management options for emerald ash borer.
Attachments:
1. Selected Websites for Emerald Ash Borer
2. Pest Alert - Emerald Ash Borer
3. Do I Have Emerald Ash Borer?
4. Insecticide Options for Protecting Ash Trees from Emerald Ash Borer
5, Xytect 2F MSDS
6. Tree-age MSDS
2
Attachment 1
Selected Websites for Emerald Ash Borer
University of MN: www.extension.umn.edu/issues/eab
MN Department of Health: www.mda.state.mn.us/plants/pestmanagementleab.aspx
MN DNR: www.dnr.state.mn.us/invasives/terrestrialanimals/eab/index.html
Community EAB Preparedness Manual (developed by above three agencies):
www.mda.state.mn.us/plants/pestmanagementleab/eabmanual.aspx
Insecticide Fact Sheet:
www.emeraldashborer.info/files/multistate _EAB _insecticide_F act_Sheet. pdf
The EAB Regulatory Review (tri-weekly e-mail newsletter for MN):
www.mda.state.mn.us/plants/pestmanagementleab/reviewarchive .aspx.
3
.., .....Sustaina ble
"IIr"'" MAPLEWOOD
Agenda Item 5.b.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Envirionmental and Natural Resources Commission
Shann Finwall, AICP, Environmental Planner
Annual Sustainability Report
November 10, 2010 for the November 15 ENR Commission Meeting
INTRODUCTION
Sustainability is described as meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generations to meet their own needs. Local governments are in a unique position to
implement and influence sustain ability by the policies they set, by the approaches they use in
city operations, and by the promotion of sustainability through city-wide education. For this
reason, local governments should lead by example.
Over the years Maplewood has made strides toward leadership in sustainability through various
programs and educational opportunities that reduce emissions and pollution. Maplewood does
this by promoting recycling, implementing stormwater best management practices in
developments and street projects, and offering environmental programming at the Maplewood
Nature Center, to name a few.
Another important opportunity for leadership in sustainability is in the area of city operations.
Maplewood should continuously assess the impacts city operations have on the environment.
When making these assessments it is important to determine if modifications are necessary to
reduce impacts and if so are the modifications practical, economical, and will they meet
community needs.
This report is intended to update the Environmental and Natural Resources (ENR) Commission
on past sustainability accomplishments and obtain feedback on sustainability goals for the
coming years.
DISCUSSION
City Council 2010 Goals
One of the city council's 2010 goals was improved environmental planning. Following is a
summary of how the city attempted to meet that goal.
ENR Commission
The ENR Commission is a strong element to the city's environmental planning. One of the
commission's missions is to develop and promote sustainable practices for city policies and
procedures, In 2010 the ENR Commission worked on the following environmental issues:
1. Chicken Ordinance to Encourage Sustainable Foods
2. Stormwater Ordinance
3. Fish Creek Greenway Ad-Hoc Commission
4, Eureka Recycling 2009 Year-End Recycling Report
.., ......Sustaina b1e
y.t1 MAPLEWOOD
5. Recycling Contract Request for Proposal
6. Flood Plain Ordinance
7. Renewable Energy Ordinance
8. Extreme Green Makeover Judging
9. Review of two wetland variances.
10. Review of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
11. Emerald Ash Borer
12. Greenways
13. Collection System Analysis
14. Neighborhood Environmental Groups
Green Team
Background: On June 23, 2008, the city council adopted the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection
Agreement. The agreement commits the city to reducing emissions and pollution in city
operations and the community. On July 28, 2008, the city council authorized staff to form a
working group (Maplewood Green Team) to review and make recommendations on how the city
can realistically and feasibly reduce emissions and pollution now and in the future. The
Maplewood Green Team held their first meeting in September 2008.
Membership: The Green Team is made up of a group of staff who work together on
environmental and sustainability issues at a city operation level. There are representatives from
each department of the city to ensure full participation. In 2010 Council member Kathleen
Juenemann was appointed as the council liaison to the Green Team. Green teams are found to
be the most successful and productive when there is buy in from upper management and policy
makers, so having representation from each department and support from the city council is key
to the Green Team's success in guiding the city toward sustainable operations.
2010 Accomplishments: In 2009 the Green Team drafted the Energy Efficiency and
Conservation Strategy. The energy strategy provides a roadmap for reducing energy use and
lowering energy costs for government, businesses, and residents. In 2010 the Green Team
focused on one of the implementation actions outlined in the energy strategy - the creation of an
environmental purchasing policy.
The environmental purchasing policy will demonstrate the city's commitment to buying goods,
materials, services, and capital improvements in a manner that reflects Maplewood's core
values of fiscal responsibility, social equity, community and environmental stewardship. The
policy will act as a guide to all city personnel in their city purchasing decisions. A copy of the
proposed environmental purchasing policy is attached for review and comment (Attachment 1).
The Green Team hopes to finalize the document after city council review on November 22, with
implementation of the policy beginning in 2011.
Sustainable City Operations Work Groups
Sustainable operations is about planning and carrying out the city's day-to-day work with full
consideration of how environmental factors affect long-term goals. It means eliminating waste,
lowering long-term maintenance and operating costs, and improving the work environment and
the community. It also translates into good economic sense.
In April 2010 city staff formed a Sustainable Operations Work Group to examine our current
operations in several areas of the city and determine impacts these operations might have on
2
....,.,... Sus tcrinG ble
y.,. MAPLEWOOD
the environment. The Sustainable Operations Work Groups served as an off-shoot of the
Maplewood Green Team, with participation from all levels of the city including maintenance staff
in Parks, Streets, Sewers, and Mechanical divisions of Public Works, as well as all other
departments.
During the first meeting the group brainstormed six areas of operations to review in 2010 with
including: 1) review of organized trash hauling; 2) city fleet operations; 3) city snow removal
and maintenance policies; 4) building operations; 5) complete street policy; and 6) turf
management plan.
Over the last several months the groups have assessed operations that have the most impact
on the environment or that the city has received the most complaints/concerns from the public
on, and reviewed these operations to determine ways to lessen their impacts. When making the
assessments the groups determined the following: 1) are changes needed in operations to
reduce impacts to the environment; and 2) will the changes be practical, economical, and meet
community needs? The individual reports can be found on Attachment 2 and highlight
recommendations for changing current operations to lessen their impact on the environment.
These recommendations will be implemented in 2011. Following is an overview of the
Sustainable Work Group's recommendations:
1. Trash Hauling Report:
. Move forward with the Collection System Analysis (review of city's trash hauling
system). This will take city council support (to be determined during a November
15 workshop). To ensure success in this sustainable operation initiative, the first
phase of organized trash hauling should be complete within one year. The
second and third phases include amendments to city ordinances and
implementation of the plan.
2. City Fleet Report:
. Conduct a fleet audit.
. Adopt a no-idling policy.
. Adopt a vehicle sharing policy
. Downsize the fleet by two vehicles over the next two years.
. Stress overall awareness and importance of sustainability throughout all daily
work.
. Encourage employee car pooling to training sessions.
. Use single vehicles rather than multiple vehicles for maintenance operations
when feasible.
Other Issues to Consider:
. Adopt policies suggested in Fleet Audit policy (currently in draft form) document
as follows:
o Right sizing the fleet.
o Conversion to bio fuels.
o Conversion to hybrid and high efficiency vehicles.
o Eco-driver education programs.
o Greening the maintenance fleet.
3
.:.....SustClina bla
.....~ MAPLEWOOD
3. Snow Removal and Maintenance Report:
. Spreader controllers upgraded in plow trucks.
. Plow truck retrofitted with side shields.
. Deicing materials to include a) salt (15 degrees F and up), b) treated salt (15
degrees F below to 15 degrees F above), c) salt/sand-mainly sand with little salt
to prevent freeze up in stock pile (temperatures below 15 degrees F).
. Training.
. Cul-de-sac snow plowing pilot project.
. Monitor changes in deicing materials and equipment.
. Consider pre-wetting.
4. Building Operations Report:
. International Green Building Code
. Department of Natural Resources (Life Cycle Cost Analysis: LCCA) for
equipment
. Retro Commissioning Analysis Program
. City of Maplewood "Green Team"
. Energy Star Program
. State of Minnesota B3 Benchmarking Program (energy consumption protocol for
city and state facilities)
. Green Seal or programs certified for environmental preferred chemicals and
cleaning products
. Energy Assessments / Recommendation / Rebates (Xcel Energy, consultants)
. Energy and Waste Management Assessments
. Grant and Rebate Programs (EECGB, Stimulus Programs, future programs)
. City of Maplewood Energy efficiency and Conservation Strategy Plan
. Consultants to support and work with government and state programs details as
required
Other Issues to Consider:
. Adopt environmental purchasing policy.
. Improvements to city facilities recycling program,
. Begin city facilities back-yard composting program for lunch room composting.
5. Turf Management Report:
. Continue implementation of the Turf Management Plan which emphasizes the
following:
o A balanced approach;
o Reducing the amount of turf in parks;
o Varying maintenance levels according to turf use or classification
(classification and management chart included in plan); and
o Reducing negative environmental impacts of turf maintenance (several
practices recommended in plan).
4
.Jill, ........SustClil1able
~~ MAPLEWOOD
Other Issues to Consider:
. This item should be renamed Park Sustainable Operations and should include
the following:
o Recycling in parks - To ensure successful recycling program in parks
which will begin March 2011 (when recycling bins delivered to the city),
the city should begin planning for the program in January 2011. The
planning phase should include buy-in from all vested groups including
recycling personnel, park management, park maintenance, nature center
personnel (for recycling programming), and the Park and Environmental
Commissions (who have both mentioned recycling in parks as one of their
goals).
6. Complete Streets Report:
. Adopt a "living streets" policy to guide all street projects toward environmental
and social benefits including:
o Improved stormwater quality
o Reduced impervious surfaces
o Traffic calming measures
o Improved biking and walking conditions
o Protect and enhance the urban forest
Other Issues to Consider:
. Adoption of such a policy will take several months for review and comment by
various city commissions including: Environmental, Planning, and Community
Design Review Board. The policy should be complete for 2012 street
reconstruction projects.
. A living streets pilot project should be considered for 2011 street reconstruction.
Minnesota Greenstep Cities
In 2008 the Minnesota Legislature directed the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to
review and make recommendations on actions and policies that could be taken by local
governments to help the state's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals. With this direction,
the MPCA recommended, and the Legislature ultimately adopted, a voluntary program that
would challenge, assist, and recognize cities for actions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The program is called Minnesota GreenStep Cities (http://qreenstep.pca.state.mn.usl) and is
designed to help cities achieve their sustainability goals through implementation of 28 best
practices (Attachment 3). Each best practice can be implemented by completing one or more
specific actions from a list of four to eight actions. These actions are tailored to all Minnesota
cities, focus on cost savings and energy use reduction, and encourage innovation
There are currently six Minnesota pilot cities participating in the new program. Any Minnesota
city can participate. To begin, a city needs to approve a resolution to work toward GreenStep
Cities recognition. Once the resolution is passed and accepted by the GreenStep Cities
program, a city then registers and posts initial information on the GreenStep Cities web site, A
work group is formed to specify implementation actions and identify a lead person for each best
5
~,"'*:..sustClinable
"'fr.~ MAPLEWOOD
practice. A work plan is created for implementation of each best practice which is then
presented to the work group and other committees and city council as needed.
The City of Maplewood has already completed many of the best practices, or is proposing to
implement the practices through our Sustainable Operations. Staff is recommending that the
City of Maplewood join the program and work toward GreenStep Cities recognition. The Green
Team can serve as the work group. Leaders have already been identified for each best practice
through our Sustainable Operations project. And finally staff can update the ENR Commission
and the city council of its work plans and successful completion of best practices during the
annual sustainability report. Adopting a resolution and working toward GreenStep Cities
recognition will further the city's environmental planning efforts,
Summary
Maplewood is in a unique position to implement and influence sustainability by the policies we
set, by the approaches we use in city operations, and by the promotion of sustainability through
city-wide education. The city should continue to strive to be a leader in the area of
sustainability.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the information provided in the sustainability report and offer feedback and comment.
Additionally, staff recommends Environmental and Natural Resources Commission recommend
approval of the attached resolution (Attachment 4). This resolution authorizes the City of
Maplewood to participate in the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program.
Attachments
1. Environmental Purchasing Policy
2. Sustainable Operations Work Group Reports
3. Minnesota GreenStep Cities Best Practices
4. Resolution of Support to Participate in the Minnesota GreenStep Program
6
Attachment 1
ENVIRONMENTAL PURCHASING POLICY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Fourth Draft
November 9,2010
Resource: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Environmental Purch<lsing Guide
http://www.rethinkrecvclinQ.com/qovernmenUeppq
1.0 STATEMENT OF POLICY
It is the policy of the City of Maplewood to:
. Support the Precautionary Principle of Environmental Protection which states if an
action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the
environment, in the absence of scientific consensus that the action or policy is
harmful, the burden of proof that it is not harmful falls on those taking the action.
. Require the purchase of products and services that minimize environmental and
health impacts, toxics, pollution, and hazards to worker and community safety and to
protect the larger global community to the greatest extent practical.
. It is not the intent of this policy to require any department, buyer or contractor to take
any action that will conflict with local, state or federal requirements or to procure
products that do not perform adequately for their intended use, exclude adequate
competition, or are not available at a reasonable price in a reasonable period of time.
2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This policy is adopted to meet the goals of a Precautionary Principle Program of
Environmental Protection that include, but is not limited to:
. minimizing health risks to city staff and residents,
. minimizing the city's contribution to global climate change,
. improving air quality,
. protecting the quality of ground and surface waters, and
. minimizing the city's consumption of resources and energy.
This policy is further adopted to encourage purchasing that reflects the city's commitment to
sustainability in order to:
. ensure that purchases include a consideration of their life-cycle cost and the ultimate
disposal cost of the product as a factor in making the final selection of the specific
goods and services procured for use by city departments,
. purchase products that include recycled content in order to support strong recycling
markets,
1
. institute practices that reduce waste by increasing product efficiency and
effectiveness, use products that are durable and long-lasting, and reduce materials
that are land-filled,
. purchase products and institute practices that conserve energy and water, use
agricultural fibers and residues, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, use unbleached
or chlorine free manufacturing processes, and use recycled wood and wood from
sustainably harvested forests,
. purchase energy from renewable or green sources in preference to fossil fuels,
. purchase products that are free of mercury, cadmium and lead and eliminate the use
of other persistent bioaccumulative toxic chemicals where possible,
. increase the use and availability of environmentally preferable products, services
and distribution systems that protect human health and the environment,
. support emerging and established manufacturers and contractors that reduce
environmental and human health impacts in their services, production, and
distribution systems, and
. create a model for successfully purchasing environmentally preferable products and
services that encourages other buyers and consumers in our community to adopt
similar goals.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
3.1 "Agricultural Bio-Based Products" means commercial or industrial products
(other than food or feed) that utilize agricultural crops or residues but does not
include products made from forestry materials.
3.2 "Buyer" means personnel authorized to purchase or contract for purchases on
behalf of the City of Maplewood or its subdivisions.
3.3 "Chlorine free" means products manufactured or processed without chlorine or
chlorine derivatives.
3.4 "Contractor" means any person, group of persons, business, consultant,
designing architect, association, partnership, corporation, supplier, contractors or
other entity that has a contract with the City of Maplewood or serves in a
subcontracting capacity with an entity having a contract with the City of Maplewood
for the provision of goods or services.
3.5 "Dioxins and furans" are a group of chemical compounds that are classified as
persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) by the Environmental Protection
Agency.
3.6 "Energy Star" means the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) energy
efficiency product labeling program.
3.7 "Energy-Efficient Product" means a product that is in the upper 25% of energy
efficiency for all similar products, or that is at least 10% more efficient than the
minimum level that meets federal standards.
2
3.8 "Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)" is a program of the Department
of Energy that issues a series of product energy efficiency recommendations that
identify recommended efficiency levels for energy-using products.
3.9 The "Forest Stewardship Council" is a global organization that certifies
responsible, on-the-ground forest management according to rigorous standards for
sustainably harvested forests developed by a broad variety of stakeholder groups.
3.10 "Green Seal" is an independent, non-profit environmental labeling organization.
Green Seal standards for products and services meet the U.S. EPA's criteria for
third-party certifiers. The Green Seal is a registered certification mark that may
appear only on certified products.
3.11 "Integrated Pest Management (IPM)" is an ecosystem-based strategy that
focuses on long-term prevention of pests or their damage through a combination of
techniques such as biological control, habitat manipulation, modification of cultural
practices, and use of resistant varieties. Pesticides are used only after monitoring
indicates they are needed according to established guidelines, and treatments are
made with the goal of removing only the target organism. Least toxic pest control
materials are selected and applied in a manner that minimizes risks to human health,
beneficial and nontarget organisms, and the environment.
3.12 "LEED Rating System" means the Leadership in Energy & Environmental
Design system developed by the U.S. Green Building Council designed for rating
new and existing commercial, institutional, and high-rise residential buildings.
3.13 "Organic Pest Management" prohibits the use and application of toxic chemical
pesticides and strives to prevent pest problems through the application of natural,
organic horticultural and maintenance practices.
3.14 "Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxins (PBTs)" are chemicals and/or pollutants
that remain in the environment for a long time (persist) without breaking down,
accumulate in the environment and build up in the tissues of humans, fish, and
animals (bioaccumulative), and are toxic (causing cancer and other health problems)
to living organisms, including humans.
3.15 "Postconsumer Material" means a finished material which would normally be
disposed of as a solid waste, having reached its intended end-use and completed its
life cycle as a consumer item, and does not include manufacturing or converting
wastes.
3.16 "Practical" mean whenever possible and compatible with local, state, and
federal law, without reducing safety, quality, or effectiveness and where the product
or service is available at a reasonable cost in a reasonable period of time. For
energy and water consuming devices, a reasonable cost shall mean that the product
has a life-cycle cost that is reasonably similar to the life-cycle costs of other similar
products.
3
3.17 "Precautionary Principle of Environmental Protection" means if an action or
policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, in
the absence of scientific consensus that the action or policy is harmful, the burden of
proof that it is not harmful falls on those taking the action.
3.18 "Pre-consumer Material" means material or by-products generated after
manufacture of a product is completed but before the product reaches the end-use
consumer. Pre-consumer material does not include mill and manufacturing trim,
scrap, or broke which is generated at a manufacturing site and commonly reused on-
site in the same or another manufacturing process.
3.19 "Recovered Material" means fragments of products or finished products of a
manufacturing process, which has converted a resource into a commodity of real
economic value, and includes pre-consumer and postconsumer material but does
not include excess resources of the manufacturing process.
3.20 "Recycled Content" means the percentage of recovered material, including
pre-consumer and postconsumer materials, in a product.
3.21 "Recycled Content Standard" means the minimum level of recovered material
and/or postconsumer material necessary for products to qualify as "recycled
products."
3.22 "Recycled Product" means a product that meets the City of Maplewood
recycled content policy objectives for postconsumer and recovered material.
3.23 "Remanufactured Product" means any product diverted from the supply of
discarded materials by refurbishing and marketing said product without substantial
change to its original form.
3.24 "Reused Product" means any product designed to be used many times for the
same or other purposes without additional processing except for specific
requirements such as cleaning, painting, or minor repairs.
3.25 "Source Reduction" refers to products that result in a net reduction in the
generation of waste compared to their previous or alternate version and includes
durable, reusable, and remanufactured products; products with no, or reduced, toxic
constituents; and products marketed with no, or reduced, packaging.
3.26 "U.S. EPA Guidelines" means the Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines
established by the U.S. EPA for federal agency purchases as of May 2002 and any
subsequent versions adopted.
4
4.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS
4.1 Source Reduction
4.1.1 The City of Maplewood shall institute practices that reduce waste and result in
the purchase of fewer products whenever practical and cost-effective, but without
reducing safety or workplace quality.
4.1.2 The City of Maplewood shall purchase remanufactured products (i.e. for
equipment and vehicles) whenever practical, but without reducing safety, quality, or
effectiveness.
4.1.3 All buyers shall consider short-term and long-term costs in comparing product
alternatives, when practical. This includes evaluation of total costs expected during
the time a product is owned, including, but not limited to, acquisition, extended
warranties, operation, supplies, maintenance, disposal costs, and expected lifetime
compared to other alternatives.
4.1.4 Products that are durable, long lasting, reusable, refillable, recyclable, or
otherwise create less waste shall be selected whenever practical.
4.1.5 The City of Maplewood requires contractors to use packaging or dishware that
is reusable, recyclable, or compostable whenever practical.
4.1.6 Packaging or dishware that is reusable, recyclable, or compostable shall be
selected when suitable uses and programs exist. Buyers shall avoid the purchase
any polystyrene foam food packaging, Styrofoam drinking cups or plates.
4.1.7 Contractors shall be required whenever possible to take back and reuse pallets
and packaging materials.
4.1.8 Suppliers of electronic equipment shall be required to take back equipment for
reuse or environmentally safe recycling when the City of Maplewood discards or
replaces such equipment, whenever practical.
4.1.9 Rechargeable and recyclable batteries shall be purchased and used whenever
practical.
4.1.10 All documents shall be printed and copied on both sides to reduce the use
and purchase of paper, whenever practical.
4.1.11 All departments shall minimize the use of colored paper for routine
publications and flyers, especially the use of Neon Bright colors, unless these
products can be proven to be made with a substantial amount post-consumer waste
product.
4.1.12 All departments shall maximize the electronic distribution of information via
websites and email for routine publications and flyers.
5
4.2 Toxics Reduction and Pollution Prevention
4.2.1 No product or service purchased by the City of Maplewood shall contain, emit,
or create the following in its use, to the extent practical:
o known carcinogens and reproductive toxins,
o persistent bioaccumulative toxicants, including lead, mercury, dioxins and
furans for example,
o compounds toxic to humans or aquatic life, corrosive to the skin or eyes, or
that are skin sensitizers, and
o substances that contribute to the production of photochemical smog,
atmospheric ozone production, or poor indoor air quality.
4.2.2 All cleaning or disinfecting products (i.e. for janitorial or automotive use) shall
at a minimum meet Green Seal Standards for environmental preferably and
performance, whenever practical. Green Seal Industrial and Institutional Cleaners
(GS-37) should be used as the standard example for environmental preferably and
performance.
4.2.3 Purchasing products containing persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic
chemicals shall be avoided, where alternatives exist. This includes following the
guidance to minimize/eliminate the use of products that contain or generate
persistent, toxic, or bioaccumulative wastes during manufacturing or reuse/disposal
such as mercury, lead, or dioxin.
4.2.4 The use of chlorofluorocarbon-containing refrigerants, solvents, and other
products known to contribute to the depletion of the ozone layer shall be phased out
and new purchases shall not contain them. The City of Maplewood shall not
purchase any chlorofluorocarbon-processed food packaging.
4.2.5 When maintaining buildings and landscapes, the City of Maplewood shall
manage pest problems through prevention and physical, mechanical, and biological
controls and use least toxic chemical pesticide products only after safer approaches
or products have been determined to be ineffective. The City of Maplewood shall
adopt and implement an organic pest management policy and practices, or review
and/or revise and further implement the City's Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
policy and practices for indoor and outdoor areas using chemical controls only as a
last resort and providing on-going education and training to City staff.
4.2.6 When maintaining buildings, the City of Maplewood shall use products with the
lowest amount of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), highest recycled content, and
low or no formaldehyde when purchasing materials such as paint, carpeting, flooring,
adhesives, furniture, and casework.
4.2.7 The City of Maplewood shall reduce or eliminate its use of products that
contribute to the formation of dioxins and furans. This includes, but is not limited to:
6
o Purchasing paper, paper products, and janitorial paper products that are
unbleached or that are processed without chlorine or chlorine derivatives,
whenever possible.
o Prohibiting purchase of products that contain or are packaged in polyvinyl
chloride (PVC) such as, but not limited to, office binders, furniture, carpeting,
flooring, other building materials and supplies, and medical supplies
whenever practical.
4.2.8 The City of Maplewood shall purchase products and equipment with no lead,
Cadmium, or mercury whenever possible. For products that must contain lead or
mercury because no suitable alternative exists, the City of Maplewood shall give
preference to those products with the lowest quantities of these metals available and
to contractors with established lead, cadmium and mercury recovery programs.
4.2.9 When replacing vehicles, the City of Maplewood shall lease or purchase only
the most fuel-efficient models available that are suitable for each task and through
carsharing and carpooling, shall minimize the number of vehicles purchased.
4.2.1 0 To the extent practical, the City shall use renewably-derived fuels or fuels that
are cleaner and less-polluting than gasoline and conventional diesel fuel, including
biodiesel, natural gas, and electricity.
4.2.11 The purchase of all pentachlorophenol, arsenic, and creosote treated wood
by the City of Maplewood is prohibited.
4.3 Recycled Content Products
4.3.1 All products shall contain the highest postconsumer content practical, but no
less than the minimum recycled content standards established by the U.S. EPA
Guidelines.
4.3.2 Copiers and printers purchased shall be compatible with the use of recycled
content and remanufactured products.
4.3.3 The City of Maplewood shall purchase re-refined lubricating and industrial oil
for use in its vehicles and other equipment, as long as it is consistent with the engine
manufacturer's warranty and maintenance requirements.
4.3.4 When specifying asphalt concrete, aggregate base or portland cement
concrete for road construction projects, the City of Maplewood shall use recycled,
reusable, or reground materials when practical and consistent with accepted
engineering practices.
4.3.5 The City of Maplewood shall specify and purchase recycled content
transportation products, including signs, cones, parking stops, delineators, and
barricades.
7
4.3.6 A 10 percent price preference may be given to recycled content products
based on the lowest bid or price quoted by the suppliers offering the competing non-
recycled content products.
4.3.7 Printing paper, office paper, and paper products will contain the highest
postconsumer content practical, but no less than the minimum recycled content
standards established by the U.S. EPA Guidelines.
4.3.8 All pre-printed recycled content papers intended for distribution that are
purchased or produced shall contain a statement that the paper has recycled
content. Whenever feasible, the statement should indicate the percentage of
postconsumer recycled content it contains.
4.4 Energy and Water Savings
4.4.1 New and replacement equipment for lighting, heating, ventilation, refrigeration,
and air conditioning systems, water consuming fixtures and process equipment and
all such components shall meet or exceed Federal Energy Management Program
(FEMP) recommended levels, whenever practical.
4.4.2 All products purchased by the City of Maplewood and for which the U.S. EPA
Energy Star certification is available shall meet Energy Star certification, when
practical. When Energy Star labels are not available, products shall meet or exceed
the FEMP recommended levels.
4.4.3 When energy is purchased, renewable or green sources are preferred. These
include solar power or photovoltaics, wind power, geothermal, and hydroelectric
. energy sources and do not include fossil fuels (coal, oil or natural gas).
4.4.4 Demand water heaters shall be purchased whenever practical. Where
renewable forms of energy are unavailable or not practical, natural
gas shall be used in lieu of electricity for space heating and water heating.
4.4.5 Energy Star and power-saving features for copiers, computers, monitors,
printers and other office equipment shall be enabled during the initial installation and
shall remain enabled unless these features conflict with the manufacturer's
recommended operation and maintenance of the equipment.
4.5 Green Building - Construction and Renovations
4.5.1 All new city buildings and renovations shall follow Green Building practices for
design, construction, and operation, where applicable, as described in the LEED
Rating System, to meet at least a minimum of a Silver level of LEED, or future Green
Building Programs adopted by the city.
8
4.6 Landscaping
4.6.1 All landscape renovations, construction, and maintenance by the City of
Maplewood, including workers and contractors providing landscaping services for
the City of Maplewood, shall employ sustainable landscape management techniques
for design, construction and maintenance whenever practical, including, but not
limited to, integrated pest management, grass cycling, drip irrigation, composting,
and procurement and use of mulch and compost that give preference to those
produced from regionally generated plant debris and/or food waste programs.
4.6.2 Plants should be selected to minimize waste by choosing species for purchase
that are appropriate to the microclimate, species that can grow to their natural size in
the space allotted them, and perennials rather than annuals for color. Native and
drought-tolerant plants that require no or minimal watering once established are
preferred.
4.6.3 Hardscapes and landscape structures constructed of recycled content
materials are encouraged. The City of Maplewood shall limit the amount of
impervious surfaces in the landscape, wherever practical. Permeable substitutes,
such as permeable asphalt or pavers, are encouraged for walkways, patios, and
driveways.
4.7 Forest Conservation
4.7.1 To the greatest extent practical, the City of Maplewood shall not procure wood
products such as lumber and paper that originate from forests harvested in an
environmentally unsustainable manner. When possible, the City of Maplewood shall
give preference to wood and wood products that are certified to be sustainably
harvested by a comprehensive, performance-based certification system. The
certification system shall include independent third-party audits, with standards
equivalent to, or stricter than, those of the Forest Stewardship Council certification.
4.8 Agricultural Bio-Based Products
4.8.1 Vehicle and equipment fuels made from non-wood, plant-based contents such
as vegetable oils are encouraged whenever practical.
4.8.2 Paper, paper products, and construction products made from non-wood, plant-
based contents such as agricultural crops and residues are to be purchased and
used whenever practical.
5.0 PRIORITIES
5.1 The health and safety of people who live and work in Maplewood is of utmost
importance and takes precedence over all other City policies. All policies and
practices shall be protective of the health of children, the elderly and other
vulnerable populations, and the greater global community.
9
5.2 The City of Maplewood has made significant investments in developing a
successful recycling system and recognizes that recycled content products are
essential to the continuing viability of that recycling system arid for the foundation of
an environmentally sound production system. Therefore, to the greatest extent
practical, recycled content shall be included in products that also meet other
environmental specifications, such as chlorine free or bio-based.
5.3 Nothing contained in this policy shall be construed as requiring a department,
buyer or contractor to procure products that do not perform adequately for their
intended use, exclude adequate competition, or are not available at a reasonable
price in a reasonable period of time.
5.4 Nothing contained in this policy shall be construed as requiring the City of
Maplewood, department, buyer or contractor to take any action that conflicts with
local, state or federal requirements.
6.0 IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 The City Manager or his or her designee shall implement this policy in
coordination with other appropriate City of Maplewood personnel policies.
6.2 Implementation of this policy will be phased based on available resources and
City priorities.
6.3 The Environmental Planner shall advise the City Manager or his/her designee
regarding environmentally preferable products that comply with this policy.
Recommendations will include input of applicable environmental staff and the
Maplewood Green Team. Whenever possible, the City will use existing eco-Iabels
and standards to make purchasing decisions.
6.4 Successful bidders shall certify in writing that the environmental attributes
claimed in formal competitive bids are accurate. Contractors shall be required to
specify the minimum or actual percentage of recovered and postconsumer material
in their products, even when such percentages are zero.
6.5 Preference for local businesses shall be accorded to promote businesses in
Maplewood that provide environmentally preferable products and services.
6.6 Contractors, contractors and grantees shall comply with applicable sections of
this policy for products and services provided to the City of Maplewood, where
practical. In particular, contractors and grantees providing written materials to the
City shall do so on recycled content paper per the requirements of this Policy and
labeled as such. Contractors and grantees shall be prohibited from using
pentachlorophenol, arsenic, and creosote treated wood.
6.7 If the buyer making the selection from competitive bids or the requesting
department seek to purchase products that do not meet the environmentally
preferable purchasing criteria in this Policy, the buyer or the department shall
provide a written justification to the City Manager or his/her designee for why
10
compliance is not practical, e.g., the product is not technically practical, economically
feasible, or available within the timeframe required. The City Manager or his/her
designee shall be the authority to approve all contracts that do not require City
Council authority or items covered under contracts executed prior to the effective
date of this Policy.
6.8 If a contractor that is under contract to the City of Maplewood is no longer able to
provide a product that meets the City's environmental purchasing policy, it shall
notify the City Manager or his/her designee and provide written justification for why
compliance is not practical. Prior written consent from the City Manager or his/her
designee, or authorized City representative, shall be required before substituting any
alternative product to any City employee.
6.9 The Information Technology Department shall be responsible for setting
duplexing as the default on each workstation for all capable printers. This includes
printing from network connected or stand-alone personal computer printers that are
capable of duplexing.
6.10 The Information Technology Department shall be responsible for advising the
City Manager or his/her designee on purchases of environmentally preferable
electronic equipment with a major focus on power consumption, energy conservation
in employee computer use, server farms and replacement IT equipment.
6.11 Training of buyers and other relevant city staff, contractors and grantees shall
include instruction on the requirements of this Environmental Purchasing Policy.
7.0 PROGRAM EVALUATION
7.1 The Environmental Planner and City Manager or his/her designee shall evaluate
the success of this Policy's implementation by providing an annual report to the City
Council. The report shall relate progress in meeting the goals and objectives of this
Policy and note any barriers encountered, recommendations for resolution, and/or
description of assistance needed to continuously improve staffs ability to meet this
Policy's objectives for the procurement of environmentally preferable products and
services.
11
Attachment 2
.:.... SusTainable
Y"~ r...1APLL\VOOD
Overview of Draft Sustainable Operations Reports
November 3,2010
Shann Finwall, AICP, Environmental Planner
1, Trash Hauling Report:
. Move forward with the Collection System Analysis (review of city's trash hauling system).
This will take city council support (to be determined during a November 15 workshop).
To ensure success in this sustainable operation initiative, the first phase of organized
trash hauling should be complete within one year, The second and third phases include
amendments to city ordinances and implementation of the plan.
2, Fleet Report:
. Adopt a no-idling policy.
. Adopt a vehicle sharing policy
. Downsize the fleet by two vehicles over the next two years.
. Stress overall awareness and importance of sustainability throughout all daily work.
. Encourage employee car pooling to training sessions,
. Use single vehicles rather than multiple vehicles for maintenance operations when
feasible.
Other Issues to Consider:
. Adopt policies suggested in Fleet Audit policy document as follows:
o Right sizing the fleet.
o Conversion to bio fuels,
o Conversion to hybrid and high efficiency vehicles.
o Eco-driver education programs.
o Greening the maintenance fleet.
3. Snow Removal Report:
. Spreader controllers upgraded in plow trucks.
. Plow truck retrofitted with side shields.
. Deicing materials to include a) salt (15 degrees F and up), b) treated salt (15 degrees F
below to 15 degrees F above), c) salt/sand-mainly sand with little salt to prevent freeze
up in stock pile (temperatures below 15 degrees F),
. Training.
. Cul-de-sac snow plowing pilot project.
. Monitor changes in deicing materials and equipment.
. Consider pre-wetting.
4. Building Operations Report:
. International Green Building Code
. Department of Natural Resources (Life Cycle Cost Analysis: LCCA) for equipment
. Retro Commissioning Analysis Program
. City of Maplewood "Green Team"
. Energy Star Program
. State of Minnesota B3 Benchmarking Program (energy consumption protocol for city and
state facilities)
. Green Seal or programs certified for environmental preferred chemicals and cleaning
products
. Energy Assessments I Recommendation I Rebates (Xcel Energy, consultants)
. Energy and Waste Management Assessments
. Grant and Rebate Programs (EECGB, Stimulus Programs, future programs)
. City of Maplewood Energy efficiency and Conservation Strategy Plan
. Consultants to support and work with government and state programs details as required
Other Issues to Consider:
. Adopt environmental purchasing policy.
. Improvements to city facilities recycling program.
. Begin city facilities back-yard composting program for lunch room composting,
5. Turf Management Report:
. Continue implementation of the Turf Management Plan which emphasizes the following:
o A balanced approach:
o Reducing the amount of turf in parks:
o Varying maintenance levels according to turf use or classification (classification
and management chart included in plan); and
o Reducing negative environmental impacts of turf maintenance (several practices
recommended in plan),
Other Issues to Consider:
. This item should be renamed Park Sustainable Operations and should include the
following:
o Recycling in parks - To ensure successful recycling program in parks which will
begin March 2011 (when recycling bins delivered to the city), the city should
begin planning for the program in January 2011, The planning phase should
include buy-in from all vested groups including recycling personnel, park
management, park maintenance, nature center personnel (for recycling
programming), and the Park and Environmental Commissions (who have both
mentioned recycling in parks as one of their goals).
6. Complete Streets Report:
. Adopt a "living streets" policy to guide all street projects toward environmental and social
benefits including:
o Improved stormwater quality
o Reduced impervious surfaces
o Traffic calming measures
o Improved biking and walking conditions
o Protect and enhance the urban forest
Other Issues to Consider:
. Adoption of such a policy will take several months for review and comment by various city
commissions including: Environmental, Planning, and Community Design Review Board,
The policy should be complete for 2012 street reconstruction projects.
. A living streets pilot project should be considered for 2011 street reconstruction,
7, Overall Recommendation
. The City of Maplewood should adopt a resolution of support to become a Minnesota
GreenStep City, The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has launched the
program in 2010 as a challenge, assistance and recognition program to help cities
achieve their sustainability goals through implementation of 28 best practices,
2
November 3, 2010
Trash Hauling Sustainable Operations Draft Report
Shann Finwall
TRASH HAULING SUSTAINABLE WORK GROUP
WORK GROUP: DuWayne Konewko, Shann Finwall, Steve Kummer
CURRENT TRASH HAULING SYSTEM:
Maplewood's solid waste management ordinance (Sections 30-1 to 30-108) requires all businesses and
residences to contract with a licensed hauler to remove trash. Presently, Maplewood has an open trash
hauling (collection) system which allows any number of city-licensed haulers to remove trash in any area
of the city. In 2010, nine residential trash haulers are licensed in the city, with an additional eight trash
haulers licensed for multi-family/commercial service, container and roll-off service, and transfer
station. Maplewood has an organized system for recycling, with only one recycling company contracted
to service all residents in Maplewood.
Minnesota Statutes, section llSA.94 (Organized Collection) gives municipalities the authority to
organize collection systems. Maplewood has attempted to organize its collection system twice since
1986. Both attempts failed due to lack of support by residents and haulers. There has been recent
interest expressed by residents, the Environmental and Natural Resources (ENR) Commission, and the
City Council to analyze the city's collection system once again.
TRASH HAULING UPDATE:
On October 4,2010, the City Council held a special city council meeting to take testimony from all
interested parties on the city's proposal to organize its trash hauling system. Approximately 150 people
attended the meeting, with 41 residents and 5 representatives of trash hauling businesses speaking to
the matter.
On November 15, 2010, the City Council will hold a workshop to summarize the results of the October 4
special city council meeting, review options for proceeding with organized trash hauling, and discuss
budgeting for moving forward.
KEY BARRIERS:
. Trash hauling companies have a strong, vested interest in the system as is without further
government intervention.
. National Solid Waste Management Association is well organized and financed to help fight
initiatives such as Maplewood's attempts to organize trash hauling.
. Minnesota Statutes requires cities to go through a very rigorous planning and negotiating
schedule, making the process time consuming and difficult.
KEY OPPORTUNITIES:
. Strong support from City Council, ENR Commission, and management.
November 3, 2010
Trash Hauling Sustainable Operations Draft Report
Shann Finwall
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MOVING FORWARD IF AUTHORIZED BY CITY COUNCIL:
. Prioritized goals and objectives - This is a critical planning step that should help further specify
city policy by refining the goals and objectives for any system improvements. The draft
statement of goals/objectives should be forwarded by city staff and the ENR Commission to the
City Council for formal adoption.
. Public Hearing and Resolution of Intent - The goals and objectives will be clearly stated in the
required resolution of intent to organize. This is the first step in the statutory process.
. Draft Organized System Plan - Create a system of organized trash hauling, i.e., one trash hauler,
consortium of haulers, day specified districts, etc.
. Discussions and Negotiations with Haulers - Allow willing haulers to individually comment on
the draft plan and share information off the record that may be proprietary and confidential.
. Findings and Final Plan - Findings to document the procedures used and public results during
the planning and hauler negotiation process. Final plan to be forwarded by the ENR Commission
to the City Council for formal adoption.
. Public Relations - Throughout the process conduct a detailed public relations strategy to plan
and implement the work and approach.
. Timeframe - To ensure success in this sustainable operation initiative, the first phase of
organized trash hauling should be complete within one year. The second and third phase
includes amendments to city ordinances and implementation of the plan.
November 3, 2010
Fleet Sustainable Operations Draft Report
Scott Schultz
Maplewood Fleet Sustainable Operations Group Report
Overview
The goal of the fleet sustainable operations group is to assess our current fleet operations and
determine what impacts they have on the environment. Once made, the assessments will be
examined to determine if modifications are needed to become more sustainable. The group
determined the following items to have the largest impact: Idling of vehicles, style of vehicles
used, employee personal vehicle choices, fuel sources being used.
Our fleet consists of a large variety of vehicles and equipment. It includes large dump trucks,
wheel loaders, i-ton trucks, pickup trucks, small and medium size off road equipment, and
automobiles. The vehicles and pieces of equipment have specific purposes and are utilized
throughout our public works operations and many city departments.
Policy and Procedures
The following are Policies and procedural changes being developed to move towards a more
sustainable fleet.
-Idling Policy (c;veev..Stel' 1;est py~chce Actio"")
-Vehicle Sharing Policy(c;veev..Stel' 1;est pv~ctke Acho",,)
-Downsizing the fleet by two vehicles over the next 2 years.
-The city is having an outside consultant conduct a thorough fleet audit.
-Stressing the overall awareness and importance of sustainability throughout all daily
work.
-Encouraging employees to car pool to training sessions (with personal as well as city
vehicles).(c;veev..Stel' 1;est PY~ct'ce Acho",,)
-Using single vehicles rather than multiple vehicles for maintenance operations when
feasible (example - no chase truck with Camera truck when televising).
1
November 3, 2010
Fleet Sustainable Operations Draft Report
Scott Schultz
Fuel Usage
The city's current fleet operates on Unleaded and Bio-diesel fuels. All gas engines use 89 octane
unleaded, and diesel engines use B-5 biodiesel(started May 2009).
We have done some research on the alternative fuel E85. The city replaced five Y, ton trucks in
2010. The five new trucks are equipped with the option to burn E85 flex fuel. A fuel comparison
was done using E85 versus regular 89 octane unleaded gasoline. E85 was found to get poorer
gas mileage and put out less power.
The city contacted several other government agencies regarding E85 use and similar results
were found. E85 was not cost effective, resulted in poorer performance and was showing to be
harmful to engines.
Our neighboring City of Oakdale did a similar study comparing E85 to regular unleaded gasoline.
They experienced a 20% decrease in fuel mileage and had considerable maintenance issues.
The E85 fuel was destroying the catalytic converters in the vehicles.
We have also done some research on hybrid vehicles. We were able to view results from a
survey the City of Eagan sent out in 2009. Many government entities throughout the twin cites
responded. The majority ofthe agencies responding said hybrid vehicles are not cost effective.
The initial costs are too high, not enough short term payout. From a public works maintenance
standpoint hybrid vehicles are not practical. Hybrids were said to be used as staff vehicles in
some cases. Some stated 'hybrid vehicles were assigned for political reasons'. It appeared that
the larger cities and counties that have more economical resources had more hybrid or electric
vehicle use. Hennepin and Dakota counties, City of St. Paul and Minneapolis(primarily use in
parks).
Summary
The above are our initial efforts in working towards a more sustainable fleet. The process to
become as sustainable as we can is ongoing. We will continue to research alternative Fuels/Flex
Fuel Vehicles and hybrid vehicles. As more information is obtained we will assess and make
modifications if they meet the environmental, practical, and economical needs of our fleet
operations.
2
Programming a More Efficient Municipal Fleet
A Review of Best Practices
Prepared for the Minnesota Retired Engineers Technical Assistance Program (RETAP)
By Richard A. Person, RETAP and Climate Change Corps Consultant
Improving a municipal fleet's efficiency results in long-term energy and cost savings, healthier
air, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. Greener fleets purchase more fuel-efficient vehicles
(cars, service vehicles, trucks and equipment), converting to cleaner fuels, training drivers to
operate vehicles for maximum efficiency, downsizing to smaller vehicles, reducing vehicles, and
implementing policies on idling, purchasing, right-sizing, and downsizing. Overall objectives:
1. Create a fleet that has the most fuel efficient vehicles available to meet various needs.
2. Optimize the fleet to ensure the most appropriate vehicles are purchased.
3. Increase alternative fuels and high efficiency passenger and light duty vehicles in fleet.
4. Incorporate fuel efficiency and emission standards into procurement specifications.
5. Incorporate more environmentally friendly maintenance practices and procedures.
6. Raise awareness of importance of fleet efficiency, responsible use of vehicles & equipment.
Strategies. Actions and Performance Indicators
Strategy 1: Fleet Inventory. Performing a fleet inventory is an important first step in evaluating
vehicles and equipment to better understand where efficiency might be improved. The
inventory includes surveying how each vehicle is used, its environmental impacts and fuel
usage. Although inventory data collection and management can be substantial undertakings,
depending on what type of inventory already exists, many efficiency vehicle and fleet measures
can be identified using inventory data and implemented at relatively low cost and effort.
Actions:
. Develop comprehensive fleet inventory covering every vehicle ("minimum requirements).
· Provide annual baseline data reports per vehicle to a Fleet Management Committee:
o Municipal Department
o "Make, year, model and drive train of vehicle
o Fuel Type (Gasoline, Diesel, Propane, etc)
o EPA mileage rating
o Projected replacement year
o If leased, what year will lease end?
o Primary use of vehicle
o ,Frequency of Use (daily, weekly, monthly, seasonally, etc)
o "Annual miles driven per vehicle
o "Annual fuel consumption per vehicle
o Average miles per gallon (mpg) per vehicle
o Annual vehicle miles traveled fuel consumption last five years
o Fuel use by department and class of vehicle
o Maintenance records (i.e. oil check, tire pressure, regular general maintenance).
o Vehicle safety checks.
o **Maintenance cost per year per vehicle
o **Operation cost per year per vehicle (fuel cost + maintenance cost)
o Alternate Fuel/Flex Fuel Vehicle replacement available?
o High Efficiency Vehicle replacement available?
o Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) replacement available?
o Diesel Oxidation Cataiyst (DOC) and PM filter installed?
· Evaluate inventory data to consider the following:
o What percentage of fleet vehicles are within acceptable fuel consumption ranges
and what percentage needs to be upgraded, retrofitted, and/or replaced?
o Determine which vehicles are good candidates for conversion to alternative fuels.
o Are vehicles being maintained for maximum efficiency and reduce emissions?
o Greenhouse gas emissions attributed to each vehicle and fleet.
Performance indicators:
Operating and maintenance costs are evaluated for each unit: age, mileage, condition of
equipment, and availability of funds are key factors in vehicle replacement decisions. Approval
of vehicle procurement requests for each Department or Division is made contingent upon
recommendation of a Fleet Management Committee.
Action
Current year
Short-term
Immediate-term
Long-term
Annual miles Increase fuel 10% less fuel 20% less fuel 2S% less fuel
traveled and fuel efficiency of used used used
consumption fleet. than 2010. than 2010. than 2010.
Strategy 2: 'Right Sizing' the Fleet. Vehicle type should be matched with its intended use (e.g.,
avoid using a larger/more powerful vehicle than is necessary). Technologies are constantly
changing; fleet managers must remain up to date on what is available. Benefits of individual
vehicle and fleet right-sizing include:
. More efficient operating practices. Reduced GHG emissions and related pollutants.
. Reduced fuel consumption, operating and insurance costs. Freed up capital.
Actions
. Update passenger and light duty vehicle replacement and procurement procedures and
specifications to incorporate fuel efficiency and emissions reduction.
. Phase out existing vehicles that are inefficient. Phase out low-usage vehicles and institute
employee mileage reimbursement program where appropriate.
. Could vehicles be replaced with non-motorized transport (bicycle, walking, all-electric)?
. Are vehicle classes appropriate for the duty requirements that vehicles perform? If not,
which types of vehicles would be better suited for each use?
Performance indicators:
Action(s)
Current year
Short-term
Immediate-term
Long-term
Implement fleet Adopt policy, Replace 10% of Replace 15% of Replace 25% of
efficiency assess fleet fleet with more fleet with more fleet with more
procurement efficient efficient efficie]lt
procedures vehicles vehicles vehicles
Strategy 3: Conversion to Biofuels. Bio-fuels and ethanol blends are widely in production and
use throughout the U.S. Biofuels replace imported oil. Draft federal legislation proposes that
by 2012, 2% of diesel fuel will be bio-fuel (already in Minnesota) and 5% of gasoline will be
ethanol (already 10% in Minnesota). Disadvantages of ethanol usage: According to National
Geographic (October 2007), producing corn ethanol uses as much fossil fuel as the ethanol itself
replaces. E-85 may reduce vehicle miles per gallon as much as 15-20%, but generally the cost
per gallon is lower due to state subsidies at the pump.
Bio-diesel is an oxygenated fuel made from vegetable oils (mostly soy) or animal fats. Bio-
diesel can be blended into petroleum-based diesel fuel up to 20 percent, which is called B20.
U.S. EPA has concluded that while bio-diesel reduces particulates (PM), reactive organic gas
(ROG), and CO emissions significantly, NOx increases slightly depending on the blend. EPA
estimates B20 reduces fuel economy by 1-2%, and costs more than diesel. Higher percentage
bio-diesel blends tend to gel in tanks during cold weather and should not be used.
Actions:
. Adopt State of Minnesota Renewable Fuels Standards and increase bio-fuel use in the fleet.
. Despite the concerns, include switching to bio-fuels in the overall fuel strategy.
Performance indicators:
Action(s)
Current year
Short-term Immediate-term Long-term
Biodiesel Increase use of Research 10% Transition Research 20%
blends used biodiesel biodiesel blend fueling network biodiesel blend
in fleet blends (Bl0) to B 10 (B20)
Action(s)
Current year
Short-term Immediate-term Long-term
Percent vehicles Adopt policy, 50% new 75% new 100% new
that are flex-fuel assess fleet vehicles are vehicles are vehicles are
(can burn E85) flex-fuel flex-fuel flex-fuel
Strategy 4: Conversion to High Efficiency and Hybrid Vehicles. As older vehicles are replaced,
purchase flexible fuel, high efficiency and/or hybrid vehicles. Eliminate older vehicles that are
inefficient or not used frequently. This can include utilizing alternatives to standard vehicles
(e.g., bicycles, segueways, Cushman electric, etc). Another common alternative to petroleum
fuels in municipal vehicles is compressed natural gas (CNG), which is 1.6 times more efficient
than burning petroleum fuels and produces 40% less C02 emissions.
Most Fuel Efficient American Cars and Light-duty Trucks:
1. Ford Escape Hybrid FWD - 36 mpg city /31 mpg highway
2. Ford Focus - 26 mpg city / 34 mpg highway
3. Ford Fusion - 24 mpg city /32 mpg highway
4. Ford Ranger - 24 mpg city /29 mpg highway
5. Mercury Mariner Hybrid - 32 mpg city / 29 mpg highway
6. Chevy Cobalt - 25 mpg city /34 mpg highway
7. Chevy Aveo - 26 mpg city /35 mpg highway
8. Chevy Cruze - 24 mpg city /36 mpg highway
9. Chevy Volt Plug-in Hybrid - The first 80 miles no fuel is burned. When battery power is
depleted the generator starts, then the car will get up to 50 mpg. Volt may get 230 mpg
under average city driving with nightly full recharge of battery. Availability in 2012.
Compare to: Toyota Prius Hybrid - 51 mpg city / 48 mpg highway (plug-in model available U.S.
2011); Nissan LEEF all-electric, and Chinese BYD-F3 plug-in hybrid (future availability in U.S.)
Actions:
. Set performance standards for new passenger and light duty vehicles. Whenever
practicable, vehicles purchased will be either an alternative fuei vehicle, high efficiency
vehicle or hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) that has at a minimum:
25% higher than USEPA combined fuel economy rating;
low EPA vehicle emission rating.
. When vehicles are switched to alternatives, track how much fuel costs are reduced.
. Require that contractors used on municipal projects implement fuel. efficiency and
emissions reduction strategies.
Performance indicators:
Action(s)
Current year
Short-term
Immediate-term
Long-term
Percent vehicles Adopt policy, 50% new 75% new 100% new
that are HEV, assess fleet vehicles HEV, vehicles HEV, vehicles HEV,
high efficiency high efficiency high efficiency high efficiency
Strategy S: Driver Education Programs. Howa vehicle is driven has a significant impact on fuel
economy. Rapid acceleration and braking are to be avoided. Drivers need to be aware of traffic
flow, traffic light changes, and lane changes so they can adjust speed gradually. Once drivers
actually see the savings they are more willing to adopt efficiency measures.
Idling for more than 10 minutes should not be allowed, with exceptions for maintenance and
diagnostic purposes, health and safety of employees (extreme weather conditions), emergency
response while on scene, transit vehicles while in revenue service, and engines required to
power auxiliary equipment.
Actions:
. Develop mandatory educational campaign for workers and managers to promote fleet
efficiency efforts and responsible use of city resources. Include fuel-saving practices such as
minimizing idling, optimizing routes, fuel reducing driving practices, carpooling and using
public transit where appropriate.
. Implement citywide vehicle and equipment anti-idling policy. Vehicles shall not be left
idling unless a running engine is necessary for power or to protect public safety.
. Consider programming heavy diesel trucks with idle shut-down systems to stop the engines
left idling for ten minutes.
. Conduct analysis of fleet scheduling and route efficiency. Reduce vehicle miles travelled
during work hours by:
Enabling video conferencing, virtual meetings, conference calling, etc.
Encouraging employees to use public transit, bicycles, walking or carpooling.
Encouraging travel-efficient scheduling so multiple tasks can be accomplished in one trip.
Encouraging meetings accessible by public transport or alternative modes of travel.
- Vehicle reservation system listed by fuel-efficiency of available vehicles
Performance indicators:
Action(s)
Current year
Short-term
Immediate-term
Long-term
Implement no- Adopt policies 10% less fuel 15% less fuel 25% less fuel
idling policy and used used used
driver education than 2010. than 2010. than 2010.
Strategy 6: Greening the Maintenance Facility. Require regular maintenance on all municipal
vehicles to increase fuel efficiency, reduce environmental impacts, and increase the life of the
vehicle. (e.g., avoid oil leaks, proper tire inflation, etc.). Make improvements related to the use
of green products. Benefits include:
. Better fuel economy.
. Improvements in driving safety.
. Lower maintenance costs due to less vehicle wear and tear.
. Reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
Actions:
· Ensure proper use, storage, disposal, and recycling of old parts and hazardous materials.
· Use environmentally friendly materials (e.g., hydraulic fluids, recycled anti-freeze and
motor oils, eco-friendly cleaners, etc.) to maintain the fleet.
. Purchase recycled products whenever possible, like re-refined motor oil; and recycling
all used motor oil, oil filters, anti-freeze, recapped tires, scrap metals, etc.
· Clean and reuse air filters and shop rags.
Performance indicators:
Action(s)
Current year
Short-term
Immediate-term
Long-term
Maximize green Assess 25% increase 50% increase 75% increase
practices in recycling/reuse environmentally environmentally environmentally
maintenance and green friendly friendly friendly
activities procurement materials materials materials
Definitions:
Alternate Fuel/Flex Fuel Vehicle (FFV)
Any fuel other than gasoline, diesel, and other substantially petroleum-based fuels that is less
polluting than gasoline or diesel. Alternate Fuels include, but not limited to, natural gas (CNG),
propane, ethanol (E-10 to E-85), biodiesel (B5 blend or above) and electricity.
Diesel Oxidation Catalvst
Diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), along with PM filters, significantly reduce emiSSions of
particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO) gaseous reactive organic gas (ROG) and NOx
from diesel engines by 50-90%. Under Federal Diesel Emissions Reduction Act, 200S or later
model diesel trucks come equipped with DOC's, PM filters, positive crankcase ventilation and
NOx absorbers, among other emission equipment. 2011 models will also be equipped with
urea-SCR catalysts to virtually eliminate NOx emissions.
1500 Minnesota school buses have been retrofitted by Project Green Fleet. Municipal fleets
retrofitted with MPCA and Project Green Fleet support include:
. Minnesota Department of . City of Minneapolis
Transportation . City of St. Paul
. City of St. Louis Park . Washington County
. City of Cottage Grove . City of Rochester
. Minnesota Valley Transit Authority . Hennepin County
Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV)
A motor vehicle that draws propulsion energy from both an internal combustion/heat
engine that runs on combustible fuel, and a rechargeable battery storage system.
High Efficiencv Vehicle
Vehicles with EPA fuel efficiency ratings that exceed 30 miles per gallon for city usage
and/or 35 miles per gallon for highway usage.
References:
1. Creating a municipal fleet with fuel efficient vehicles: http://www,flaqstaffaz.qov/
2. Environmental Defense Fund, Fuel-Smart Drivinq Handbook
3. Ontario Municipal Best Practices Manual: http://www.fleetchallenqe.ca/
4. City of Milwaukee Green Fleet Practices: http://apwa.net/ResourceCenter/
5. Green Fleets Fleet Inventory: http://www.sustainableiersev.com/
6. City of Toronto, Green Fleet Plan
7. US Green Building Council, Green Facilities Partnership
8. Minnesota GreenStep Cities Actions, City Fleets: http://qreenstep.pca.state.mn.us/
(1) Decrease use of city vehicles by means such as trip bundling, video conferencing,
carpooling and financial incentives for efficient vehicle use.
(2) Right,size the citv fleet with the most fuel-efficient vehicles that are of an optimal
size/capacity for their intended functions.
(3) Document the phase,in of at least three of the following in vehicle contracts, for
city or local transit fleets, or for school/park board fleets:
a. Monthlv monitoring and reoorting for staff on fuel usage and costs.
b. Training for more efficient driving, including anti-idling behavior/rules.
c. Maintenance schedules that optimize vehicle life and fuel efficiency.
d. Alternative fuel vehicles.
e. Charging stations (solar or wind powered) for plug,in hybrid and full electric
vehicles.
f. Lower-carbon fuels (such as biodiesel, straight vegetable oil) using a life-cycle
calculation.
g. More fuel-efficient vehicles.
h. Car share vehicles owned by a third party to decrease fleet size.
i. Bicvcles.
(4) Phase in bike, foot or horseback police patrols.
(5) Document that the local school bus fleet has optimized routes, start times,
boundaries, vehicles, bus fuels, and driver actions to decrease fuel use.
(6) Participate in Proiect Green Fleet to retrofit or replace diesel engines, or to install
auxiliary power units that reduce truck and bus idling.
9. Polk County, FL Vehicle Replacement Policy: http://apwa.net/ResourceCenter/
10. City of Largo, FL Vehicle Replacement Guidelines: http://apwa.net/ResourceCenter/
11. Vehicle Evaluation Checklist - City of Rochester NY: http://apwa.net/ResourceCenter/
12. Minnesota Renewable Fuels Standards, Minnesota's Ethanol Proqram
Executive Orders 06-03 Renewable Fuels and 04-10 Fleet and Travel Management
a. REDUCE GASOLINE USE
Using 2005 as a baseline, the state of Minnesota shall reduce the use of gasoline
used in on-road vehicles owned by the state departments by 25 percent by 2010
and 50 percent by 2015.
b. REDUCE PETROLEUM-BASED DIESEL FUEL USE
Using 2005 as a baseline, the state of Minnesota shall reduce the use of
petroleum based diesel fuel used in on-road vehicles owned by state
departments by 10 percent by 2010 and by 25 percent by 2015.
c. FLEET COMPOSITION
Ensure that when reasonably possible all on-road vehicles purchased:
i. Use cleaner fuels as that term is defined in Minnesota Statute 16C.135, or;
ii. Have fuel efficiency ratings that exceed 30 miles per gallon for city usage or
35 miles per gallon for highway usage.
d. FUELING PRACTICE
All state employees utilizing vehicles capable of operating on cleaner fuels must,
whenever practical, use cleaner fuels when operating these vehicles. For the
purpose of this executive order the term "whenever practical" refers to the
availability of the cleaner fuel.
e. AGRICULTURE-BASED FUEL PRODUCTS
Increase the use of renewable transportation fuels derived from agricultural
products including ethanol, biodiesel fuel, and hydrogen fuels.
f. TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE RELIANCE ON STATE FLEET
Increase the use of technology to enhance access to and delivery of government
information and services to the public, and reduce the reliance on the state's
fleet for the delivery of such information and services.
13. Government Fleet Top News, August 05,2010
Minnesota State Vehicles Increase E-85 Use by 25%
SAINT PAUL, MN - Minnesota's state agencies increased their use of cleaner-burning E-
85 fuel by 25 percent to 437,063 gallons during the first half of 2010, part of their effort
to reduce petroleum use. The conversion tally was compiled by the SmartFleet
Committee, a group created to advise and monitor state agencies' transition.
The top agency in terms of volume was the state Department of Transportation which
used 170,617 gallons of E-85 in six months compared to 376,312 gallons of gasoline and
690,798 gallons of B5 biodiesel blend fuel. E-85 gains in 2010 eliminated more than
1,745 tons of carbon emissions and harmful pollutants from entering the air.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN - The City of Minneapolis has added two new electric cars to its
fleet. The cars use no gasoline and make almost no sound. Minneapolis plans for
inspectors in the downtown area to use these vehicles for their rounds. The City said it
will cost 56 cents to fully charge each electric car. The cars only travel about 25 miles
per hour, according to http://wcco.com.
The EXV4, which looks like a cross between an Army truck and a golf cart, is made in
Princeton, Minn. It's built with aluminum and fiberglass and weighs just less than one
ton. The initials of the ZENN, the other electric car added to Minneapolis fleet looks
more like a conventional car, stand for "Zero Emissions, No Noise."
The City of Minneapolis also has 50 hybrid vehicles in its fleet that use electric motors
and small gasoline engines, and over 300 alternative vehicles.
November 3, 2010
Snow Sustainable Operations Draft Report
Bryan Nagel
SNOW/ICE SUSTAINABLE WORK GROUP
WORK GROUP: Michael T, Shann F, Ginny G, Bob R, Troy B, Bryan N
Information for report:
Spreader Controllers upgraded in plow trucks:
1. This will allow us to calibrate each truck for the specific deicing material that is used.
2. Spreaders will be preset to put out a specific poundage of material per lane mile according to
pavement temperature, forecast, and deicing material being applied.
3. Controllers will record poundage put out during each event and a season total. Besides from
record keeping and reporting this will allow us to monitor individual operator usage in each
route.
Other Equipment modifications:
1. All plow trucks have been retrofitted with side shields. This will prevent loss of material that
normally would spill out between the tailgate and spreader.
Deicing materials:
1. In previous years our oniy deicing material was a salt/sand mixture. This year we will be utilizing
three materials, salt, treated salt, salt/sand-mainly sand with little salt to prevent freeze up in
stock pile. Straight salt is a deicer that will work from 15 degrees up it will have no deicing ability
below 15 degrees. The treated salt will work to minus 15 degrees and will also have less bounce
or scatter once it hits the roadway from the spinner. Sand has no deicing ability and is used only
for traction in temperatures below -15.
2. In previous years our salt/sand mixture worked as a deicer in temperatures above 15 degrees
but it was a salt/sand mix where the sand in the mix served no purpose. In temperatures below
15 degrees the salt had no deicing effect, the sand offered traction yet it was applied with salt.
Training: In the past several months maintenance staff have been attending various training courses
from MNDOT, U of M Extension, Watershed, and MPCA. The maintenance staff has recently taken the
MPCA Certification Test. Maintenance staff are scheduled for two more courses this month, proper
calibration of salt/sand controllers and MNDOT driving course for plow operators.
Future Ideas:
Cul-de-sac plowing and snow dumping. Could be a pilot project this season.
Continue to monitor changes in deicing materials and equipment, prewetting could become required in
the future.
November 4, 2010
Building Operations Draft Report
Larry Farr
Memorandum
SUSTAINABLE BUILDING OPERATIONS FOR THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I ntrod uctionjOverview
Building Operations for the City of Maplewood consists of all of the cities buildings and
structures. This involves the relevance of their operations towards the future operations,
functions, infrastructure, operational cost, reduction through energy savings/programs,
reductions on environmental impact, maintenance, and fiscal responsibility for the future.
The city faCilities/buildings consist of the following with the square footage of the larger ones.
. Maplewood Community Center (85,920 square feet)
. City Hall / Police Department (43,588 square Feet)
. Public Works (58,750 square feet)
. Parks Building
. Fire Departments: five (5)
. Nature Center
. Park Structures: six (6) (warming houses, ball fields)
. Specialty Structure: twelve (12) (Weir Stations, Gate Valves) approx.
Building operations will use the following codes and programs to help guide us with our decisions,
planning, appropriations, policies, procedures, programs, implementation, and directives for the future.
. International Green Building Code
. Department of Natural Resources (Life Cycle Cost Analysis: LCCA) for equipment
. Retro Commissioning Analysis Program
. City of Maplewood "Green Team"
. Energy Star Program
. State of Minnesota B3 Benchmarking Program (energy consumption protocol for city and state
facilities)
. Green Seal or programs certified for environmental preferred chemicals and cleaning products
. Energy Assessments / Recommendation / Rebates (Xcel Energy, consultants)
. Energy and Waste Management Assessments
. Grant and Rebate Programs (EECGB, Stimulus Programs, future programs)
. City of Maplewood Energy efficiency and Conservation Strategy Plan
. Consultants to support and work with government and state programs details as required
My desktop/ building operations/ sustainable Maplewoodj Building Operations
November 3, 2010
Turf Management Sustainable Operations Draft Report
Jim Taylor
Turf Management Update - Fall 2010
In April 2010, staff presented a Turf Management Plan to Maplewood City Council. The plan
emphasized:
1. A balanced approach;
2. Reducing the amount of turf in parks;
3. Varying maintenance levels according to turf use or classification (classification and
management chart included in plan); and
4. Reducing negative environmental impacts of turf maintenance (several practices
recommended in plan).
In Summer 2010, staff implemented stop-mowing trials in three parks (Joy Park, Applewood
Park, Maplewood Heights) and at three city faCility/lift stations. At two of the park sites, staff
and volunteers followed up with hand pulling and herbiciding of spotted knapweed and birds'
foot trefoil. In addition, volunteers planted shrubs on a slope near Wakefield Park parking lot,
removing this area from mowing.
Projects scheduled for Fall and Winter 2010-2011 include:
1. Review our turf management plan with University of Minnesota turf experts.
2. Meet with vendors to explore options for environmentally-friendly lawn care products.
3. Select site(s) for testing new products or methods in 2011.
4. Develop priority list for turf reduction areas at parks and select areas for stopping
mowing in 2011. Develop plan for weed control in these areas.
S. Create schedules and procedures so we can implement the classification and
maintenance chart beginning Spring 2011.
6. Staff is discussing whether to apply for a RWMWD grant for a buffer
restoration/demonstration area around pond at Maplewood Heights Park (as presented
in the 2010 work plan to council) or to just stop-mowing the whole buffer area.
November 4, 2010
Complete Streets Draft Report
Michael Thompson
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
Environmental and Natural Resources Commission
Sustainability Operations Team
FROM: Michael Thompson, City Engineer / Dep. Director of Public Works
Steve Love, Assistant City Engineer
Steve Kummer, Civil Engineer II
Jon Jarosch, Civil Engineer I
Troy Brink, Streets Crew Chief
Ann Hutchinson, Naturalist
Virginia Gaynor, Naturalist
Mike Martin, City Planner
SUBJECT: Complete/Living Streets Recommendations
DATE: October 4,2010
INTRODUCTION
The Complete Streets sustain ability work group was charged with studying the concepts of
complete streets/green streets and making recommendations to the commission and council.
The group has prepared background information, an overview of current operations and policies
for city streets for both new development and street reconstruction, and presents it
recommendations herein.
BACKGROUND
The Complete Streets group met April 28, 2010, June 29, 2010, and September 30, 2010. At
the June 29th meeting Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District and Barr Engineering
presented the Living Streets case study they are conducting with North Saint Paul. Over the
entire period group members provided individual contributions and furthered their knowledge on
the topic. A few members attended Complete Streets workshops in Ramsey and Hennepin
Counties.
Terminology surrounding this topic can be confusing. Complete Streets typically refers to street
design that provides for multiple modes of transportation (auto, mass transit, pedestrian, bike).
Green Streets typically refers to street design that reduces environmental impacts by reducing
impervious surface, managing stormwater, and providing shade. Ramsey-Washington Metro
Watershed District and North St. Paul are using the term Living Streets to combine these
definitions.
Complete Streets LeQislation
The State of Minnesota passed Complete Streets legislation in 2010. The Commissioner of
Transportation has committed Mn/DOT to implement a complete street vision for the trunk
November 4, 2010
Complete Streets Draft Report
Michael Thompson
highway system. Cities are encouraged to adopt policies to meet their unique needs; however it
is not a mandate.
According to Mn/DOT, "Complete Streets does not mean "all modes on all roads"; rather, the
goal of Complete Streets should be to:
1) Develop a balanced transportation system that integrates all modes via planning
inclusive of each mode of transportation (i.e., transit, freight, automobile, bicycle and
pedestrian)
2) Include transportation users of all types, ages and abilities.
Examples of Complete Streets goals and principles listed in the report to the legislature include:
1) Reduce crash rates and severity of crashes.
2) Improve mobility and accessibility of all individuals including those with disabilities in
accordance with the legal requirements of the ADA.
3) Encourage mode shift to non-motorized transportation and transit.
4) Reduce air and water pollution and reduce noise impacts.
5) Increase transportation network connectivity.
6) Maximize the efficient use of existing facilities.
7) Strive for tax supported investments to provide maximum benefits to the community
and all user groups.
8) Safely integrate intermodal connections across the transportation network.
9) Promote safe and convenient access and travel for all users (pedestrians, bicyclists,
transit riders) and people of all abilities as well as freight and motor vehicle drivers.
The City of Maplewood finds some of these examples useful however the City wants to go
further in addressing the environment and active living instead of focusing solely on a
transportation vision.
Minnesota GreenStep City
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has launched the Minnesota GreenStep City
program. This is a challenge, assistance and recognition program to help cities achieve their
sustainability goals through implementation of 28 best practices. The actions related to
complete streets/green streets include:
1) Adopt a complete streets policy that addresses street trees and storm water, and modify
street standards accordingly.
2) Adopt zoning language for a selected area/project that is substantially equivalent to the
LEED for Neighborhood Development credits for Walkable Streets or Street Network.
3) Document the installation of trees, and green stormwater infrastructure, and utility
renovations as needed (sewer, water, electric, telecommunications) as part of at least
one complete street reconstruction project.
4) Identify and remedy non-complete street segments by, for example, adding a bike
route/lane or sidewalk.
5) Identify and remedy street-trail gaps (at least one) between city streets and trails/bike
trails to better facilitate walking and biking.
6) Implement traffic calming measures in at least one street redevelopment project.
The discussion portion of this report will focus on:
1) Actions or practices that have the most impact on the environment or associated
operations;
2
November 4, 2010
Complete Streets Draft Report
Michael Thompson
2) Assessing our operations to determine methods to become more sustainable and
reduce impacts on the environment;
3) Determining if the modifications will be practical, economical, and meet community
needs.
DISCUSSION
LivinQ Streets
Landscape Architect Fred Rozumalski from Barr Engineering and RWMWD Administrator Cliff
Aichinger gave the taskforce a very informative presentation on the Living Streets concepts they
developed for North St. Paul. RWMWD Administrator has given staff permission to use
information from their report and presentation and the following discussion uses materials from
the North St. Paul project.
Living Streets pulls together the concepts of complete streets, green streets, and puts additional
focus on quality of life aspects for city residents. Figure 1 below shows the components of
Living Streets. The model balances the "green" components (environment and social factors)
and the "grey" components (transportation and utilities) of the system.
Storm water capture and use
Trees
Pedestrians movement
Pedestrian safety
Bikes
Community
Aesthetic character
Traffic
Speed
Sewers
Gas
Electric
Telecom
Storm water drainage
INfRASTRUCTURE
FIGURE 1 - RWMWD/BARR REPORT
The taskforce thinks a Living Streets concept better fits our goals than a Complete Streets
concept. Maplewood's goals are similar to those developed by RWMWD and Barr Engineering
for North Saint Paul. We believe our Living Streets policy should:
1) Improve stormwater quality through expansion of the rain garden program, reducing
the impervious footprint, and meeting or exceeding the 1" infiltration standard.
2) Implement traffic calming measures through the use of techniques best suited for
site conditions.
3) Improve biking and walking conditions along natural connector routes and collector
streets through designation of bike lanes, sidewalks, or multi-purpose trails.
4) Create boulevard tree standards that provide environmental benefits (stormwater
management, shade to reduce heating and cooling costs, filtering air pollutants),
enhance quality of life, and are practical and affordable.
5) Minimize construction costs while also ensuring future maintenance and replacement
costs are equal to or less than that of a standard street section.
3
November 4, 2010
Complete Streets Draft Report
Michael Thompson
Greatest Impact Items and AssessinCl Operations
The following items are high impact items that should be further assessed in order to become
more sustainable with the living streets concept:
1) Rain gardens - The city's rain garden program has represented Maplewood well in the
eyes of communities throughout the U.S. in terms of sustain ability and "going green."
Our program includes installing rain gardens as part of street reconstruction projects,
conducting educational programs to support residents that install rain gardens on their
own, and promoting the use of rain gardens in new development.
The early street reconstruction projects that included rain gardens had high
resident participation and thus made a significant impact reducing stormwater volume.
But the number of residents requesting rain gardens on street reconstruction projects
has decreased over the years. In 2009-2010 staff made two changes on the Hills and
Dale project to try to increase resident participation and redirect staff resources: 1) have
contractor plant the home gardens, and 2) test a new "whole street" planting design.
Participation in the home rain garden program has increased dramatically on this project.
In coming years, rather than devoting so much staff time to supporting planting of the
home gardens (placing plant orders, sorting orders, delivery, coordinating planting day,
mulching), staff can now focus on education support for maintaining the gardens. We
believe nothing promotes rain gardens better than attractive, well-maintained gardens
from previous projects.
Staff recommends that we continue to investigate ways to increase resident
participation in rain garden programs, including ideas such as adjusting the
Environmental Utility Fee credits/incentives for qualifying best management practices
Pros-
i. Minimal maintenance required by city for home gardens, reduces
pollutants to lakes and wetlands, provides aesthetic enhancements to
neighborhoods, reduces volume of water within the system thereby
increasing existing capacity, can reduce storm piping infrastructure
requirements
Cons-
ii. Need to determine a long-term maintenance policy for residential gardens
(e.g. residents sign a form that they will maintain, etc.), need ongoing
educational support for home gardens, large city gardens require
maintenance and an experienced gardener, a garden could be filled in by
a resident in the future, cannot count on rain gardens because the
program is voluntary
2) Street sections - Currently our standard urban street section calls for a 32' wide street
section and cul-de-sacs require a diameter of 93'. Reducing the width of streets reduces
the amount of impervious surface and lessens the environmental impact. Over the past
years, the city has allowed for narrower streets in some new developments and has
incorporated parking bays and traffic calming designs (narrowing of street) on some
street reconstruction projects (Beam Avenue, English Street, Hazelwood Street). Our
Engineering Department will be exploring some of these design concepts on the
Western Hills street reconstruction project in 2010-2011.
A majority of vehicles have a width of 8.5' or less including fire trucks, school buses, and
garbage trucks. The required turning diameter for a fire truck or school bus is about 93'
which matches the current requirement for city cul-de-sac standards. However many
4
November 4, 2010
Complete Streets Draft Report
Michael Thompson
school buses no longer enter into cul-de-sac locations for pickup but rather pick children
up at the nearest cross street. Also, fire trucks and safety vehicles can maneuver within
cul-de-sacs with a much tighter diameter.
As seen in Figure 2, a street section of 22' can accommodate parking on one side of the
street with two cars comfortably passing one another on a residential street. A 22' street
section with parking on one side can also accommodate larger vehicles but there may
be some yielding when vehicles must pass one another near a parked vehicle.
FIGURE 2 - RWMWD/BARR REPORT
If parking is needed on both sides of a residential street then a street section of 26' can
accommodate two parked cars and a passing vehicle in between, with yielding required
at the pinch points. This concept is shown in Figure 3.
""'B''''..g
WBlI
SI'..mhi"".
R<>B""',,~
c.,,,.....*C"'b
and"""'''',
$<r",,,,-T...,,,.
[~..ti"",
$........ [d~..
$id........l~
"..,,,....at..,
.
Compoo....'"
FIGURE 3 - RESIDENTIAL STREET - RWMWD/BARR REPORT
5
November 4, 2010
Complete Streets Draft Report
Michael Thompson
A general windshield survey showed that not many cars are parked along city streets
during daytime. City ordinance prohibits cars parked on city streets from 2:00 a.m. to
6:00 a.m. The taskforce recommends we reevaluate street parking in Maplewood and
develop guidelines about levels of street parking that should be provided in different
scenarios.
On current street reconstruction projects, residents are sometimes asked whether they
would like the street narrowed. In the past, few neighborhoods have wanted to decrease
street width. The taskforce recommends that the city thoroughly explores street widths,
cul-de-sac diameters, street parking, street standards, and develops a policy that helps
minimize environmental impacts. This should include educating residents about the
costs and benefits associated with street widths and exploring incentives for
neighborhoods that reduce street width during street reconstruction projects.
Pros-
i. Reduces impervious area, reduces pollutants and runoff votume, slows
traffic by narrowing, reduces future reptacement costs and maintenance
because the footprint would be smaller than current standards
Cons-
ii. Reduces area for on-street pedestrians if no sidewatk exists or is wanted
in the boutevard, safety vehicle needs, idea may not be accepted by
residents
3) Active Living Opporlunities - Providing a designated system of sidewalks, trails, and
bike lanes increases the likelihood for walking and biking. During development of
Maplewood's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the city evaluated our sidewalk and trail
system and identified future trails and connections needed. Currently City Code requires
sidewalk installation adjacent to collector streets, however, it will be important to start
providing on-street bikeways to promote active lifestyles in addition to sidewalks. Figure
4 depicts a typical layout of a collector street with biking and pedestrian facilities.
6
November 4,2010
Complete Streets Draft Report
Michael Thompson
Rlght.-of.W~y
M,~..I It....,
E~"ring
St...... Ed~..
.
FIGURE 4'- COLLECTOR STREET - RWMWD/BARR REPORT
This typical collector street section would accommodate parking on one side of the
street in addition to biking lanes on either side. A sidewalk would also be placed on one
side of the street. Bump outs would be provided to provide for some traffic calming and
also providing additional opportunities for stormwater treatment. A review and revision
of standards would need to be conducted to determine the type of street best
suited for this treatment.
Pros-
i. Promotes walking and riding bikes, reduces need for vehicle use on short
trips if proper infrastructure is in place, traffic calming using bump outs
Cons-
ii. May require wider streets to accommodate biking lanes, impacts into
boulevards, additional costs for striping and maintenance, difficulty to
plow and maintain in winter especially with bump outs
4) Pervious Pavement- Maplewood has installed pervious asphalt parking lots at the
public works building and at Geranium Park. Both are functioning well, but studies are
still ongoing to determine life expectancy and maintenance protocols for this type of
system. The city of Shoreview recently installed pervious concrete on a roadway in a
smaller neighborhood and to date considers the project a success. It is important that
the city continues to explore the latest infrastructure technologies.
Pros-
i. Reduces need for storm sewer pipes, reduces pollutants and volume of
runoff, quieter when driven on compared to regular pavement, firmer
stable walking swtace
Cons-
ii. High cost, maintenance issues, predictability
5) Tree Plantings - Trees provide many benefits to the community. They help treat
stormwater, filter air pollutants, provide shade which can lower energy consumption, add
7
November 4, 2010
Complete Streets Draft Report
Michael Thompson
value to homes and enhance the aesthetics of a neighborhood. The city's current right-
of-way ordinance does not allow tree plantings within public rights of way/boulevards,
however, the city typically requires planting boulevard trees on Planned Unit
Development projects. The city has no policy regarding replanting trees that die. In
addition to boulevards, trees could be considered within cul-de-sac islands as a green
street feature. The taskforce recommends that we review the city's policies on
boulevard trees. A review should include cost estimates for tree planting and
maintenance and ensure the policy is affordable.
Pros-
i. Provides shade to homes thereby reducing energy needs, provides a
neighborhood feel, aesthetically pleasing, trees utilize excess runoff and
act as a filler, shades pavement which reduces hot/cold cycles increasing
pavement longevity
Cons-
ii. Conflicts with utilities in the boulevard, requires ongoing
maintenancelpruninglremovallreplanting if diseased
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that the commission and city council review this report and provide feedback.
It is further recommended that the environmental and natural resources commission
recommend approval of a Living Streets policy, and that the city council adopt the attached
resolution signifying its intent to have staff begin a formal study and creation of a Living Streets
policy.
Attachments:
1) Resolution
8
AttQcJ'h-r;P ..3
MINNESOTA GREENSTEP CITIES BEST PRACTICES, ACTION
OPTIONS AND PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
, -- -,
5 Buildings & Lighting Best Practices
- ,
1. Public Buildings
(1) Enter baseline information into the Minnesota 83 data-base an-cfcontinue entering
---- monthly energy use data from city-owned buildings.
(z)'Audff(orwheiicost-effectfve, recommission) all city-owned buildingsfnHie'6oltom third
of the B3 energy performance ranking and implement a maioritv of energv efficiencv
opportunities that have a payback under 5 years.
13, complete energy effiCiency Improvements In at least one eitV;-sch-601 or parK C1lstnct--
: building (in addition to buildings addressed in action 2) via retrofit and retro,/re,
commissioning, with financing at attractive interest rates under MN's PBEEEP program or
related lease-purchase financing, energy performance contracting, or other cost-justified
program.
(4) Participatelnother state or utility programs that provide rebates or co,funding for energy
efficiency improvements to public buildings.
(5) Renovate and operate at least one city-owned"buildin!lto'meet or quaiify for a green
building standard.
-'--(6) Create an internal loan fund for making public building improvem'ents based on an energy
or green building standard. -----
(7) Install in at least one public 6-uildlng'ilf least one of the following energy efficiency
measures:
----
i
i a. A distributed energv technology: micro,turbine, fuel cell, reciprocating engine.
I m__~'_'___ .. , , ,...." "'" ,.. ,.. ,,__ , , _,_,__
, b. A ground-source, closed loop geothermal system where net greenhouse gases are
. less than those generated by the system being replaced.
I ------
2. Private Buildings
__________n ___
(I) Create a marketing and outreach program with the local utility and/or the local
Community Action Program to promote residential energy use reduction and energy efficiency.
(2) Integrate green building Information into the building permit process.
(3) Develop a (or modify an existin'gjtruth-in:housTng inspection program for homes being
sold, to include a blower-door test and energy-use rating.
-'~(4f'-Part'n-er With an assistance provider such as a utility, Energy5mart, MNTAP or ReTAP, and
document at least one of the following: _ _ __on -
a. Building energy improvements in businesses.
----- ,,---
b. Use of Energy Star's Portfolio Manger by businesses.
-----
c. Operation of a ieast three buildings to meet or qualify for a green building standard.
------ ,-, ---------
(5) Take action to conserve drinking water resources through at least one the following:
---- " "" , " " "m m __, ,n__,_,_
a. Implement a robust watering ordinance.
b. Implement a conservation rate structure.
c. Adopt, with modifications as necessary, a modellandscapingerdinance to allow for
low water-use landscaping.
, d. 'en,'"t"a rebate or feebate program to promote purchases of WaterSense- and
,
, Energy Star-rated appliances. .-
(6) Provide a meaningful and-slgnlticanflncentive to builders, homeowners, businesses or
institutions who renovate to a green building standard:
--
a. Building permit fee discount
------ ,-
b. Grant, rebate or tax breaks (e.g., property tax abatement)
--~-- ----
c. Expedited permit review
d. Green building design assistance
------ u__ -,
e. Density bonus
(7) Customizei'model sustainable building policv and adopt language govern;'ng commercial
renovation projects: ...'-
---- ______n_
a. Receiving city financial support, and/or
------- u__ -
b. Requiring city regulatory approval (conditional use permit, rezoning, PUD status).
(8) Arrange for on-bill financing, using either utilityer' pro'perty tax bills, to make'
,.", home/building sustainability improvements easier and more affordable. -
- ----
3. New Green Buildings
(1) Require, by ordinance, new city-owned buildings an-d substantial remodels to meet or
qualify for a green building standard.
----- '(2) 'Work with the local school or park diStrict to ensure that all scliools or park buildings
meet or qualify for a green building standard.
(3) Customize a model sustainable building policv and adopt language governing new
development projects: -
a. Receiving city financial support, and/or
b. Requiring city regulatory approval (conditional use permit, rezoning, PUDlo
_._____ ..___.___ u__ \___
(4) Provide a meaningful and significant incentive to residents, builders or developers who
build to a green building standard: ----
------ .
a. Building permit fee discount
----
b. Expedited permit review
- -
C. Green building design assistance
------ -.
d. Grant, rebate or tax breaks (e.g., property tax abatement)
---- --
e. Density bonus
--- (SY--Adopt covenant guidelines for commonlnterest communities addressing issues such as
stormwater, native vegetation, clothes lines and renewable energy. -
(6) Work with local finanCiaTfnstitutions to use energv-efficient mortgages for buildings
seeking a green building certification.
------------
------ -
4. Outdoor Lighting & Signals
- .---
(1) Require energy efficient, Dark-Sky'c'ompiiant new or replacement outdoor lighting fixtures
on city-owned buildings and facilities.
(2) Require all new'street lighting and traffic signals to be Dark-Sky compliant, energy effiCient
lighting technologies.
-----,.--., ,,"'- " "" , ., '
(3) Modify any city franchise or other agreement with a utilitv to facilitate rapid replacement
of inefficient street lighting.
(4) Synchronize traffic signals so as minimize car idling at intersections yet maintain safe and
'publicly acceptable vehicle speeds. uu_
(5) Install solar powered lighting in a street, parking lot or park project.
(6) Work with a utility program to relamp exterior building lighting for at least 30% of city-
owned buildings with energy efficient, Dark-Sky compliant lighting.
(7) Replace at leas\50%of the city's parking lot lighting with Dark,Sky coniplial1t, el1'ergy
efficient, automatic dimming lighting technologies.
----. (8) Replace at least one-third of the city's traffic signals with energy efficient LED lighting
technologies.
- - -- --
, u I -,
5. Building Reuse , ' , u , "~
i (1) Develop and adopt an historic preservation ordinance to encourage adaptive reuse, with
:attention to energy and resource conservation, indoor air quality and other green building
I
! practices.
1(2) For cities with 'tradition'al downtown areas, implenie'l1't the Main Streei:'model for
!commercial revitalization with attention to green building practices. -
----- Work with a local school to either add-on space, or to repurpose space into non-school
(3)
uses, with attention to green building practices.
---(4}-Create/modifya green residential remodeling-assistance/financing program to assist
homeowners in adding space to their existing homes while retaining historic architectural
elements.
-- .- (5) Adopt development and design standards that facilitate infilland redevelopment. such as
developing strip/big box commercial areas into more livable/walkable neighborhoods and
gathering places. ---
----.-.
---- ----- '"
5 Land Use Best Practices
- --
6. Comp Pian
(1) Adopt/have an adopted comprehensive plan that is less'than ten years old (required for
Category A cities) OR, Category Band C cities may simply adopt a land use plan that was
adopted by a regional entity or the county less than ten years ago.
(2) Demonstrate that -regulatorvordinances complv whfi-the comprehensive plan including
but not limited to having the zoning ordinance explicitly reference the comprehensive plan as
the foundational document for decision making.
(3) Include requirements-in comprehensive plans for intergovernmental coordination dealing
with at least six of the following issues:
-.
a. Transportation
..
b. Watershed impacts
".. -
c. Land use
---------- ---- -
d. Economic development
----- - ---
e. Housing and foreclosures
---- ,..,
f. Police
,.., ------- ------
g. Fire
-------------
h. Health
----- m --
i. Sewer and water
(4) Include provisions ill the comprehensive plan that explicitly aim to achieve a'll of the
following goals:
a. Minimize t e ragmentation an eve opment 0 agricu tura, orest, wi i e, an
high quality open space lands in and around the city.
______u___ _______n__ _____ .___ _____ _ ___on
b. For cities adjacent to undeveloped land: establish a rowth area with sta in criteria
that reflects projected population growth and, if applicable, is subject to an orderly
annexation agreement and planned extension of municipal services.
----- ------~
c. Establish policies to reduce vehicle miles traveled.
(5) Adopt climate protection or energv independence goals and objectives in the
comprehensive plan or in a separate policy document, and link these goals to direct
implementation recommendations.
7. Higher Density
(1) Limit barriers to higher densitv housing byinclud'ing in the city zoning ordinanceancr--
zoning map a zoning district that allows:
a. Traditional urban neighborhood single-family density at six units per acre or greater.
b.Multnil-rli1fyhousingatagross ,fensity of at least 15 units per acre adjacent to a
commercial zoning district or transit center.
(2) Encourage higher densitv housing through at least two of the following strategies:
a. Incorporate a flexible lot size/frontage requirement for infill development.
b. Use density and floor areil ratio' (FAR) bonuses in selected residentialzoning
districts.
c. Tie a regulatory standard to comprehensive plan language defining compact city
expansion zones that limit sprawl.
d. Allowing accessory dwelling units by right in selected zoning districts.
(3) Encourage a higher intensitv of commercial land uses through at least oneof tl1eiolTOwing
strategies:
a. Include in the city zoning ordinance and zoning map a commercial district with
reduced lot sizes and zero-lot-line setbacks, or a FAR minimum between .75 and 1.
b. Set targets for the minimum number of employees/acre in different commerCial
zones.
--I'W Provide oneor mo-reof the follOWing incentives for infill projects, or forlife,cycle housing
near job or retail centers, or for achieving an average net residential density of seven units per
acre:
a. Building permit fee discount.
b. Expedited permit review.
______ ______________n
c. Grant or tax breaks.
d. Other incentives.
"(sf -ModTfytheaty zoning ordinance and zoning map to arrow~ without variance or rezoning in
at least one district, developments that meet the prerequisites for LEED-Neighborhood
Develooment certification.
8. Mixed Uses
(1) Create a main street program or organize a Minnesota Design Team planning charrette.
-------- ----
(2) Locate or lease a new government facilitv that'has at least two of these attributes:
a. Near an existing employment or residential center.
---- ,--
b. Accessible by walking and biking.
-- -- ------- ------
c. Accessible by any existing regular transit service.
-, , -,
(3) Modify a planned unit development - PUD ' ordinance to emphasize mixed use
,," development or to limit residential PUDs to areas adjacent to commercial development.
(4) Certify a new development as complying with LEED-ND standards, including the'mixed-use
credits.
(5) Create, or modify an existing, downtown zoning'district to ailow residential and smail
compatibie commercial development, based on the 2009 Minnesota Model Ordinances tor
Sustainable Development.
(6) Create, or modify an existing, district to use form-based zoning sta'ridards that de, -- -
emphasize use,based standards. -
(7) Create incentives for vertical mixed-use development in appropriate locations (downtown,
commercial districts near colleges or universities, historic commercial districts).
----- - ---
9. Highway Development
(1) Conduct-a visual preference survey with community members arid establish design gOa15""
I for highway corridors.
'(2) Participate in-regionaYe"conomic development ola-nning with represen-tatives from
,
: surrounding townships, cities, the county and business interests to: -,
i a. Estimate commercial/industrial needs among ail jurisdictions.
,
b. JOintly implement recommendations to stage highway commercial development in'
, order to avoid overbuilding and sprawl.
;(3) Adopt transportatio-riinfra.structure design standards that accomplish alleast one of the
foilowing:
-- -----
, a. Improve the ecologic functions of land adjacent to highway corridors.
,
, b. Facilitate clustering of commercial highway deveiopment.
--------
c. Context.sensitive design.
,
(4) Adopt, with modifications as necessary, at least one of the following model ordinances:
, - -----
a. Model access management overlav
------ - ----
b. Highwav Commercial District
c. Adequate Pubiic Facilities ordinance that stages highway commerc:ial development
concurrently with infrastructure expansion.
, (5) ..' " " ,---
Require decommissioning in development agreements for big box stores should they
remain vacant for several years. -
- ---- --- ----
10. Conservation Design ,-
(1) Conduct a Natural Resource Inventory and Assessment (NRI and NRA) and incorporate
protection of priority natural systems or resources through the subdivision or development
- process, as described in Minnesota's 2009 Model Ordinances for Sustainable Development.
(2) For cities outside or on the fringe of metropolitan areas, conduct a cost of public services
studv for deveiopment outside the city grid and adopt development standards or a
concurrency ordinance to ensure staged urban growth that protects natural systems.
(3) For cities within metropolit"an"areas; incorporate by poli-cynwoodland best management
practices into zoning or development review.
(4) For cities with undeveloped natural resource areas use, or adopt as policy the use of, a
conservation design scorecard as a tool in negotiating development agreements.
'(5) Develop and fund a conservation easement program, sucli as a purcha'seo(development
,rights program, in collaboration with a land trust.
4 Transportation Best Practices
11. Complete Green Streets
i (1) Adopt a comoiete streets oolicv that addresses street trees and stormwater, and modify
:street standards accordingly.
I
: (2) Adopt zoning language for a selected area/project that is substantially equivalent to the
,
I LEED for Neighborhood Development credits for Walkable Streets or Street Network.
! (3) Document the installation of trees, and green stormwater infrastructure. and utility
! renovations as needed (sewer, water, electric, telecommunications) as part of at least one
!
:complete street reconstruction project.
'(4) Identify and'remedv non,comolete street segments by, for example, adding a bike lane or
!sidewalk.
: (5) Identify and remedv street-trail gaos (at least one) 'between city sireets and trails/bike
I
trails to better facilitate walking and biking.
(6) Implement traffic calming measures in at least one street redevelopment project.
!
-,~
12. MobilityOptio_ns
! (1) Promote walking, biking and transit use by one or more of the following means:
a. Produce/distribute a mao(s) and70Tslgnage and/or a web site that shows (by'
neighborhood if a larger city) key civic/commercial sites, best bike and pedestrian routes,
and transit routes and schedules.
b. Increase the number of bike facilities: racks, bike stations, showers at city offices.
c. Increase the number of bus facilities: signage, benches, and shelters.
--~- d. (ncrease the number of empfoyers who offer ualified t-rans ortation frin- e be-nefits
instead of only a tax-free parking fringe benefit.
e. Launch an Active livIng-campaign in concert wIth your local comni-unity health
board.
-12j-li,unch a Safe Routes to School program-With educational, public heaith and other'
partners.
; (3) Prominently identify on'the ciTy's web site mobilitv o'ptions for hire: transit services;
'paratransit/Dial-A-Ride; cab service(s); rental car agency(s).
(4) Promote carpooling or on-demand ridesharfng among community'members, city
employees, businesses, high schools and institutions of higher education.
(S) launch an eWorkPlace Minn'esotac'amoaign. working with business and transportation
management organizations, or help bring telemedicine technology to a local health care
provider.
(Eif- Accomplish at least one of the following, working with otlier units of local governments as
needed:
a. Add/expand transit service.
b. Launch a car sharing or bike sharing business.
13. City Fleets , , ,_ " '
-- ~i) Decrease us-e',,1 dty vehicles by means such as trip bundling, video conferencing,
carpooling and financial incentives for efficient vehicle use.
(2) Right-size the citv fleet with the most' fuei-elficient vehicles that are of an optimal
size/capacity for their Intended functions. --
...----(3) 'Document the phase,in of at least three of the following in vehicle contracts, for city or
local transit fleets, or for school/park board fleets:
a. Monthlv monitoring and reporting for staff on fuel usage and costs.
--------- ___un ,,-
b. Training for more efficient driving, including anti-idling behavior/rules.
-
c. Maintenance schedules that optimize vehicle life and fuel efficiency.
d. Alternative fuel vehicles.
------- , , Charging stations (solar or wind powered) for plug,in hyilrid and full electric -----
e.
vehicles.
f. Lower-carbon fuels (such as biodiesel, sti'aight vegetable oil) using a life-cycle
calculation.
-- -----------
g. More fuel-efficient vehicles.
h. Car share vehicles owned by a third party to decrease fleet size.
i. Bicvcles.
(4) Phase in bike, foot or horseback police patrols.
(5) Document that the local school bus Ileet has optimized routes, start times, boundaries,
!vehicles, bus fuels, and driver actions to decrease fuel use.
,(6) Participate in Proiect GreenFleet to retrofit or replace diesel engines, .c"r t6hlstall auxiliary
power units that reduce truck and bus idling. --
,
!
14. Demand-Side Travel Planning
(1) In development standards, right-size parking minimurri'standards and add'parking
maximums in pedestrian-friendly or transit-served areas.
(2) For cities-.with-regular-tr-ansit service, require or provide l-ncentives for the siting of re't"ail
services at transit/density nodes.
(3) For cities with regular transit service, req"uIre-or-.provide incentives for the- siting of higher
-.. density housing at transit/density nodes. -----
"(4) lncorporate-demand-s-ide transportation strategies into aevelopment regulations.
adopting, with modifications as necessary, at least one of the following from Minnesota's 2009
Updated Model Ordinances for Sustainable Development:
________n_______ ------
a. Travel Demand Management Performance Standard
--------
b. Transit-oriented Development Ordinance
---------. (5) Document that a development project certifies under the LEED for Neighborh'ood
Development program and is awarded at least one of the following credits:
a. Transportation Demand Management.
b. Housing and Jobs Proximity.
--- ------ - - --- - - ,-
__n --
9 Environmental Management Best Practices
- ----
15. Environmental Purchasing
(1) Adopt a policy or administrative policy directing that the city purchase only:
----- -- -- ---- n_ ,--
a. EnergvStar certified equipment and appliances and
---------
b. Paper containing at least 30% post-consumer recycled content.
(2) Purchase 15% of city energy requirements from renewable energv sources.
(3) Establish a local purchasing preference and, working with a local business association,
develop a list of locally-produced products and suppliers for common purchases.
:(4) Require purchase of U.S. EPA Water Sense,certified products for all product categories
I
,covered by the Water Sense program. --- --- -
.---------- _.- --------. - ----- --------
(S) Set minimum standards for the percentage of recvcled,content material in at least S
---- products typically purchased by the city, such as asphalt and roadbed aggregate.
- (6) Require printing services to be purchased from companies certified by Minnesota Great-n
Printers or by the Sustainable Green Printing Partnership.
(7) Lower the environmental footprint of meetings and events in the city through one or
-- more ofthe following: ------ -
'-
a. Adopt a policy for meetings and events hosted by city government.
_._-~- 6:- 'U", n ",,_
'Adopt a policy for meetings anclevents taking -place on city property, including
parks and libraries.
, c. Distribute educational materials for use at city-supported evenis such as National
Night Out.
(8) -S'pecTfy'('he use of state and nationafgreen standards/guidelines for at leasf3 of the
following categories of purchasing:
-----
a. Electronics
b. Wood products
--------- ,-,
c. Organic food
d. Cleaning products
-~ -----
----i-- e. Paints, coatings and adhesives
--------------- ____n_____ ------ ----- ,-
f. Ca rpets
g. Furniture
- - ---------
h. Paper products
-------- ----
16. Urban Forests
__n___
(1) Qualify as a Tree Citv USA.
(2) Adopt as policy MN Tree Trusts' Best Practices and us'e the guidelines in at least one
development project to achieve an excellent an exemplary rating. ----- ----
(3) Budget tree installation and maintenance to, within IS years, achieve the following tree
canopy shading for streets, sidewalks and parking lots in the following zoning districts:
-------------- ------
a. At least 2S% for industrial and commercial zoning.
__n_______ __ -------- --- -
b. At least 75% for residential zoning.
--------
(4) Maximize tree planting along your main downtown street.
----
(S) Adopt at least two of the following ordinances/policies: _______n____
a. Adopt a policy of no net loss of specified natural landscapes.
-----~' Adopt a policy relating to replacement of trees on public, or on public and private,
property.
c. Adopt landscaping/nuisance ordinances that promote/-rather than .ere-ate barriers
for, native vegetation.
____n______ ------------- -
---------- ,-
17. Stormwater
(1) - ---- -----------
Complete the Blue Star Citv stormwater management assessment and achieve a minimum
In threshold of specific activities detailed in this program.
-------------
(2) Adopt by ordinance one or more of the following:
a. A narrower streets provision that permits construction of 22-foot roads.
b. -A LS-in-ch rafnfall on-site rainwater infiltration design requirement for construction--
sites.
c. A stormwater runoff volume limit to pre-development volumes for the S,year, 24-
hour rainfall maximum event.
(3) Maintain less than 12% impermeable surfaces in the watershed in which the city lies.
---- -----(4) Create a stormwater utilitv that uses varia-blefees to incentivize enhanced stormwater--
management and funds community storm water infrastructure and assistance/education
programs.
-----
(5) Adopt and implement design standards or guidelines for new development and re-
development in the city establishing requirements for at least one of the following:
__~__ - - _______ - u_
a. Rain gardens.
b. Green roofs with or without cisterns and water/grevwater reuse systems.
----- -----
c. Green alleys.
d. Green parking lots.
(6) Adopt an ordinance with erosion and-sedimentncontrol provisions as well are ---
requirements for permanent stormwater treatment.
,
,
18. Green Infrastructure
(1) Identify gaps and connectivity breaks in youre;ty's-system of parks, trails arid open spaces,
and remedy at least one of them.
- ----12J--- Plan and-budge-ffura- netw-m:rof parks, green spaces, wat-er"fe-iltures and trails in all new-
development areas.
(3) Document at least one of the following:
a. At least 20% of total city land area in prote-cted green infrastructure (parks and - ----
protected natural resource areas and trails).
b. All residents are within a Y, mile of a park or protected green space.
(4) Adopt low-impact design standards in parks and trails that infiltrate or retain all ifiich;24=
hour stormwater events on site.
(5) Create park management standards that maximize at least one of the following:
a. Low maintenance native landscaping.
------
b. Organic or integrated pest management.
c. Sources of non-potable water for irrigation.
----'(6) Certify,at least one golf course in the Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary Program for Golf
Courses.
(7) Construct'ililnew park buildings to a green building standard, with special attention to
highlighting and educating around the green features.
(8) Develop a program to involve communitv members in land restoration and stewardship.
19. Surface Water
(1) Assist at least one lake or river association to earn the Star Lake/River designation for
their lake/river.
(2) Assist at least one lake or river association to become Star Lake/River-readv by achieving a
majority of the program requirements.
(3) Work with other organizations to support citizen education about and involvement with
actions to attain measurable, publicly announced lake, stream, ditch and wetland health
improvement targets adopted by the city council and reported on each year. n,_,___
.----------
(4) Adopt a shoreland ordinance consistent with MN Dept. of Natural Resources rules as
modified.
-------- -
-
20. Water and Wastewater Facilities
,-
, (1) Compare the energv use and performance of your facilities with other peer plants using
standardized, free tools.
.-
(2) Plan and budget for motor maintenance and upgrades so as to assure the most energy
efficient, durable and appropriate equipment is available when upgrades or break downs occur.
-----
,
,
(3) Establish an on-going budget and program for decreasing inflow and infiltration into
'sewer lines, involving at least gutter, foundation drains and sump pump disconnects.
(4) Assess energy and chemicals use, inflow and infiltration \iolume-s,water"ieuse potential
and pollutants, and implement one-third of recommendations with a pavback of less than 3
years.
---(5) 'Require property'ownersto'have-thelip'rlvatesaniiary sewer lateral pipe inspected before
a property sale or title transfer.
no,
(6) Implement at least one of the following projects/programs:
a. Assist locaThusinesses,.msii-tu"ifC;-ns and/or residents in pre-treating and low-ering
--- volumes and toxicity of sewer inflows. ____no_on
b. Co-generate electricitv and heat from the wastewater treatment plant.
e. Reuse water (sell reclaimed water) from a wastewater plant fo',-n-o'n[,otable-ag=---
processing, irrigation or power plant uses.
- ----- - ---
d. A grevwater reuse system in at least one public or private building.
-- -------
--- ----------------
21. Septic Systems
(1)--Report to landowners suspected noncompliant or failing septic sysfems as part of an
educational, informational and financial assistance and outreach program designed to trigger
voluntary landowner action to improve septic systems. -----
----- -- ----------
(2) Create a program that follows the five-step process for addressing failing septic systems
developed by the University of Minnesota's Onsite Sewage Treatment Program.
(3) Implement one or more organizational options for the proper design, siting, instaHation,
- operation, monitoring and maintenance of septic systems,
(4f- Adopt a Subsurface Sewage Treatment System ordinancebasedoiithe Association of
Minnesota Counties model ordinance template.
(5) Create -a progra-m-to finince-seotlc systems upgrades through, for example, a city revenue
bond, repayable through taxpayers' property taxes.
(6) Work with homeowners and businesses in environme6hlTly sensitfVe- areas ana--aieas-- ----
where standard septic systems are not the least-cost option to promote innovative waste water
sYstems.
(7) Arrange for assistance to commercial. retail and industrial businesses with water use
reduction, pollution prevention and pretreatment prior to discharge to septics.
----------------
22. Solid Waste Reduction
,(1) Adopt percentage reduction goals for waste and toxicity generated from city operations
I(including schools, libraries, parks, municipal health care faciiities). Accomplish reduction goals
in at least three of the following areas:
a. Overall waste generation
b. Paper use and junk mail
, c. Pesticide/herbicide use
,J_ d. Water use/waste water generation
I (2) Adopt and meet aggressive goals for the overall percentage diversion of currently
:disposed waste from city operations into recycling and organics collection.
:(3) Document signing of at least one resource management contract with a waste hauler for
one or more of:
I'
City government operations.
-----
b. Schools, libraries, parks, or municipal health care facilities.
c. A commercial or industrial business,
--------
-'[4) Publicize, pronlote arid use the varledTiuSfnesses collecting and marketing used and
repaired consumer goods in the city/county.
,(5) Arrange for a residential or business/institutional organks-collection/management
program (food-to,people, food-to-animals, composting, anaerobic digestion, and backyard
'composting).
---'(6)-Orgamze residential solid waste-collection by private and/or public operations to
accomplish multiple benefits.
(7) For Cities that prOVide direct or contract waste colledio,'-s-ervlces,-Dffer volume-based ---
Jllifl!!g on residential garbage and/or feebates on recvcling so that the price differences are
large enough to increase recycling/composting but not illegal dumping.
(8) Adopt a construction and demolition ordinance for'projects over a specified size that
mandates levels of recycling and reuse for materials and Sail/land-clearing debris and is tied to
demolition permits.
" ,
a.
,---
~L~o~ill Air Qualitl'.______
(1) Conduct an education/financial assistance campaign around one of the following issues:
a. Indoor wood burning behavior. to ensure that wood burning is only done with
seasoned wood and in a manner that doesn't negatively impact neighbors.
--'-b:--Tridoor wood burning technologv. to result in community members upgrading from
ineffiCient/more polluting fireplaces and wood stoves to natural gas stoves and fireplaces
or the most efficient certified wood stoves.
c. Smoker cars - older model/high polluting vehicles, to result in repairs spurred by
repair vouchers. -
(2) Regulate outdoor wood burning. using model ordinance language, performance standards
and bans as appropriate, for at least one of the following:
---------.-
a. Recreational burning,
'..m___
b. Outdoor wood boilers.
''''(3) Conduct one'ormore educatio'n/behavlor' change campaigns on the topics below and-
document:
a. Decreased vehicle idling in specific locales or by specific fleets.
- --------
b. Increased sales by retail stores of low and no-VOC household products.
c. Replacement of gasoline,powered equipment with lower polluting equipment.
-, "-(4f Document the participation of it least3jarger businesses/fleets in at least one olthe
following:
a. Clean Air Minnesota's Proiect GreenFleet.
___1-______
b. U.s. EPA's SmartWav Transport program.
___u__ ---- --------
c. Installation of auxiliarv power units that reduce truck and bus idling.
___no. -------..
(5) Install at least two public charging stations for plug,in hybrid and full electric vehicles.
----- --------
----- -------
S Economic and Community Development Best Practices
----------- ------- ------
24. Benchmarks & Community Engagement ---..-- ------~ -, -
(1) Report progress annually to community members on implementation of GreenStep City
- best practices, including energy/carbon benchmarking data if gathered.
'(2l" Organize go-als/outcome measures trom all Cltv plans comprehenSive, parks, liDrary; -----
; housing, stormwater, drinking water, transportation, economic development, energy,
;sustainability, etc. - and annually report to community members data that show progress
toward meeting these goals.
-- -- ---~-Engage community members in a public process involving a city council committee or
community task force that results in city council adoption of and commitment to measure and
---- report on progress toward sustainabilitv indicators.
'(4) -Conductoisupport an energy efficiency or sustainability education andaction campaign
;for:
---
, a. The entire community
!
! - - - --- --------
b. Homeowners
------
c. Block clubs/neighborhood associations
d. Congregations
-- --- --
e. Schools and youth
-~E6nd-uct-6r support a community education, visioning and planning initiative using a
sustainability framework such as:
------------------
a. Strong Towns
-------, ----------- -
b. Transition initiatives
c. Eco-municipalities/The Natural Step
_n_ ______ -----
d. ISO 14001
----- -- ------------
e. Post Carbon Cities
----------- _n___
f. Permacuiture
-------- ----- ------ ,
g. Natural Capitalism
h. Genuine Progress
~-' ----- --- -- n_ _______________ - _u_ -----
i. Healthy communities
-------
j. Multi-generation learning um___m__ __,_
------- --------
25. Green Business De'Velopment " , , , , , "..un, u u, ----
(1) Identify new and emerging 10calbusinesses-'r1-tfie green economy and support these
businesses and green jobs through one or more of the following:
a. Coordinated marketing and business assistance.
- --- ,---- n__ _n__ ---------- u_____
b. Incubator space.
- ---------- -,
c. Streamlined grants, loans or permitting processes.
-------------
d. Workforce training opportunities with community colleges and job training centers.
I
1(2) Invite assistance providers. including utilities, to conduct personalized energy,
'environmental sustainability, benchmarking, and waste audits with_at..least 5 businesses.
,
(3) Distribute green tourism resources to all tourism and hospitality businesses in the city and
faciiitate follow-up with at least five businesses to assist them in greening their business.
. ---
(4) Support the creation of a value-added business utilizing local waste products, such as
wood from.felled trees or reusable deconstruction and landscaping materials.
(5) Document steps taken to lower the environmental footprint of a brownfield ,--
remediation/redevelopment project. -----
__n________
(6) Use a green business certification program to publicly promote that a targeted number or
percentage of businesses has improved the environmental performance of their company. ----
(7) Conduct or participate -In i:i-t,uv-Tocai camoaign. working withlocaT organizations and
assistance providers.
-(sr' Work with the state Small Business Environme'ntalAssistance Program (SBEAP) to help at
least 5 businesses to use SBEAP services.
----
'u
~~: Rene""able Erler~y '" " , , _U~_
(1) Adopt, with modifications as necessary, at least one of the following from Minnesota's
2009 Model Ordinances for Sustainable Deveiapment :
a. Solar energv standards.
-----
b. Model wind energy ordinance.
(2) Consistently promote at least one of the following:
----
a. A local utility's green power purchasing program for homes and businesses.
- -, Local, state and federal financial incentives for property owners to Tnstall renewable
b.
energy systems.
(3) Create a ren-ewable energy financing program for p-ropertyowners to install gen-eratio~
capacity.
(4) Promote firms that contract with property owners (in groups or ind'ivic:!ually) to
install/finance,renewable installations, some at little or no upfront cost.
--(5)instaTf a pu'blic sector renewable energv technologv, such as solar electric (pVj, solar hot
water or hot air, micro-hydro or wind. "
(6) Work with private/public partriersto create renewable energy-gen-eration capacitv with
one or more of the following attributes: ,~-
a. Fueled by flowing water, wind, or biogasO,.
b. Fueled in part or whole by woody biomass, optimizec:!for minimal air and other
environmental impacts and for energy efficiency and water conservation. ,-
c. Distributing heating/cooling services in a district energy system.
d. Producing combined heat and power.
m
- --- ----- ".
27. Local Food
(1) Incorporal'eworking landscapes - agricultu'ie and for'estry - into the cityby adopting, with
modifications as necessary, one or more of the 2009 Minnesota Modei Ordinances for
Sustainable Development: ----
-------- -----
a. Agriculture and Forest Protection District
---------
b. Local Food Production District
------------ ----
c. Performance Standards for Minor and Major Agricultural Retail.
,(2) Permit the incorporation of food growing areas/local food access into a residential
development.
i (3) Expand/strengthen or create at least one of the following:
I a. A farmer's market.
b. A communitv-supported agifclJlture {tsAf-arrangement betweenlarmers and
community members/employees.
c. A community or school garden. orchard or forest.
d. A rural grocery store.
(4) Conduct at least one of the following campaigns to measurably increase:
a. Purchase of local and Minnesota,grown food.
--------
b. Backyard gardening.
'-c.--'lnstftuti6nalblJyingof local foods by schools, hospitals/nursing homes, restaurants
and hotels, or grocery stores
d. Sale of local food in markets and restaurants.
28. Business Synergies
,(1) Help at least three businesses register as users of the Minnesota Materials Exchange and
: document their exchanges/sales of byproducts with otherlocaljregional businesses.
, ,.., '-(2)- As's';',!a! least one busiriess,th'r'6'lJgha voiuntary coordination or incentive program, to use
waste heat or water discharge from another business or city facility.
(3) Require, build or facilitate at least four of the following in a business/industrial proiect:
a. Shared parking/access.
b. Shared recreation /childcare facilities.
c. A green job training program.
d. Green product development, manufacturing or sales.
e. Buildings located within walking distance of transit and/or residential zoning.
f. Renovated buildings.
---------
g. Buildings designed for reuse.
h. Green buildings built to exceed the Minnesota energy code.
i. Combined heat and power (CHP) generation capacity.
j. Shared geothermal heating/cooling.
k. Low-impact site development.
(4) Use eco,industrial park tools to identify industrial facilities that couid achieve economic
and environmental benefit by co-locating in the city's industrial park or industrial zone.
Frolll~",_C>.ng all the best practices (1 :28), t_he "floating BP" requirement:
TOTAL BEST PRACTICES IMPLEMENTED TO BE RECOGNI2ED AS A STEP 3 GREENSTEP CITY
Attachment 4
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
MINNESOTA GREENSTEP CITIES PROGRAM
WHEREAS, uncertainty in energy prices and the transition away from fossil fuel energy
sources present new challenges and opportunities to both the City of Maplewood and to the economic
health of its citizens and businesses: and
WHEREAS, climate changes have been observed in Minnesota and have the potential to
negatively impact local, regional and state economies; infrastructure development; habitat; ecological
communities, including native fish and wildlife populations; spread invasive species and exotic
diseases; reduce drinking water supplies and recreational opportunities; and pose health threats to
our citizens; and
WHEREAS, local governments have the unique opportunity to achieve both energy use
and climate change gas reductions through building and facilities management; land use and
transportation planning; environmental management; and through economic and community
development; and
WHEREAS, efforts to address energy and climate issues provide an opportunity to move
toward energy self-reliance and greater community resiliency; provide environmentally healthy and
cheaper-to-operate public buildings; encourage new economic development and local jobs; and
support local food and renewable energy production; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has adopted the U.S. Mayors.Climate Protection
Agreement on June 23, 2008, which commits the city to reducing emissions and pollution in city
operations and the community; and
WHEREAS, the in September 2008 the City of Maplewood formed a working group to
(Maplewood Green Team) to review and make recommendations on how the city can realistically and
feasibly reduce emissions and pollution now and in the future based on the goals and objectives of
the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Session Laws 2008, Chapter 356, Section 13 directed the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency ("MPCA") and Office of Energy Security in the Department of Commerce
("Office of Energy Security"), in collaboration with Clean Energy Resource Teams ("CERTs"), to
recommend municipal actions and policies that work toward meeting the State's greenhouse gas
emissions reduction goals; and
WHEREAS, the Next Generation Act of 2007, Minnesota Session Laws 2007 - Chapter 136:
(1) sets State greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals of cutting emissions to 15 percent below
2005 levels by 2015,30 percent below 2005 levels by 2025, and 80 percent below 2005 levels by
2050; (2) sets a State energy conservation goal of achieving annual energy savings equal to 1.5
percent of annual retail energy sales of electricity and natural gas; (3) establishes an energy policy
goal that the per capita use of fossil fuel as an energy input be reduced by 15 percent by the year
2015, through increased reliance on energy efficiency and renewable energy alternatives;
(4) establishes an energy policy goal that 25 percent of the electricity used in the state be derived
from renewable energy resources by the year 2025; and
WHEREAS, a broad coalition of public and private stakeholders including the League of
Minnesota Cities, the MPCA, Office of Energy Security and CERTs responded to the 2008 legislation
by establishing the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program to provide a series of sustainable
development best practices focusing on local government opportunities to reduce energy use and
greenhouse gases; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program assists in facilitating technical
assistance for the implementation of these sustainable development best practices; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program provides cost-effective sustainable
development best practices in the following five categories: (1) Buildings and Lighting; (2)
Transportation; (3) Land Use; (4) Environmental Management; and (5) Economic and Community
Development;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Maplewood does
hereby authorize the City of Maplewood (the "City") to participate in the Minnesota GreenStep Cities
program. Be it further resolved that the City:
1. Appoints Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner, to serve as the city's GreenStep coordinator
to facilitate best practice implementation; and
2. Will facilitate the involvement of community members, civic, business and educational
organizations, and other units of government as appropriate in the planning, promoting and
implementing of GreenStep Cities best practices; and
3. Will identify a short list of best practices for initial implementation by February 2011; and
4. Will claim credit for having implemented and will implement in total at least 16 required and
optional GreenStep best practices that will result in energy use reduction, economic savings
and reduction in the community's greenhouse gas footprint. A summary of the city's
implementation of best practices will be posted on the Minnesota GreenStep Cities web site.
Adopted this _ day of November, 2010.
By:
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
2