HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-10-26 CDRB Packet
AGENDA
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Tuesday,October26,2010
6:00 P.M.
Council Chambers - Maplewood City Hall
1830 County Road BEast
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes:
a. September 28, 2010
5. Unfinished Business:
6. Design Review:
a. The Shores at Lake Phalen - Landscape, Photometric and Signage Plans
7. Visitor Presentations:
8. Board Presentations:
9. Staff Presentations:
a. City Hall Campus Plan
10. Adjourn
MINUTES OF THl: MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD BEAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28,2010
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Ledvina called the meeting to order at 6:28 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Boardrnember Jason Larners
Chairperson Matt Ledvina
Boardmember Michael Mireau
Boardmember Ananth Shankar
Vice Chairperson Matt Wise
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Staff Present: Michael Martin, Planner
Michael Thompson, City Engineer
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Boardmember Shankar moved to approve the agenda as presented.
Boardmember Mireau seconded the motion.
Ayes all; the motion passed.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - August 24, 2010
Boardmember Mireau moved to approve the minutes of the August 24, 2010, minutes as
presented.
Boardmember Shankar seconded the motion.
Ayes all; the motion passed.
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
September 28, 2010
Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
a. Frost Avenue Bridge
Michael Thompson presented the background on the proposed Frost Avenue bridge
replacement, which was previously presented to the CDRB. Mr. Thompson requested the
CDRB's final feedback and a recommendation on the bridge design and form liner options as
well as preferences for the rest area prior to presenting to the City Council.
Jerry Pertzsch, from Kimley-Horn and Associates, also addressed the board to present the
various concepts and answer board members' questions.
Mr. Thompson summarized the CDRB recommendations as follows:
1. Concept 1 with the proposed height differential
2. Option B form liner
3. Rest area location Concept B
VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None
VIII. BOARD PRESENTATIONS
None
IX. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
a. Green Building Program Presentation - Nick Carver
Nick Carver, assistant building official with the City of Maplewood, presented a preview of the
city's proposed green building program.
b. Changes to Granting of Variances
Michael Martin provided information regarding recent changes to the Minnesota Supreme
Court's interpretation of how cities evaluate variance requests.
X. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 7:56 p.m.
September 28,2010
Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes
2
zMEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
LOCATION:
OAT!::
James Antonen, City Manager
Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
The Shores at Lake Phalen-Planned Unit Development, Wetland
Buffer Variance, Lot Division and Design Review
Link Wilson of Kaas Wilson Architects, representing the owners and
developers, Jack Rajchenbach and Albert Miller of Maplewood Senior
Living, LLC
940 Frost Avenue
October 15, 2010
SUBJECT:
APPLICANTS:
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
In August, the city council approved several requests made by Jack Rajchenbach and Albert
Miller of Maplewood Senior Living, LLC to redevelop the 7.02 acre former St. Paul Tourist Cabin
site (940 Frost Avenue). This development will be called The Shores at Lake Phalen and will
have 105 units of senior housing in a three-story building with underground parking. The Shores
at Lake Phalen development would be the first redevelopment project within the Gladstone
Neighborhood Redevelopment area.
As part of the city council approvals, three areas were referred back to the community design
review board for further review and action. These areas include the tree preservation and
landscape plan, the photometric plan and the signage plan.
BACKGROUND
July 25, 2006, the city council held a public hearing to review the closure of the St. Paul Tourist
Cabin site. This hearing was required by state law to review the impacts that the park closing
might have on the displaced residents and the park owner.
December 13, 2006, the Metropolitan Council awarded the City of Maplewood a $1.8 million
Livable Communities grant to help fund the proposed Phase I public improvements in the
Gladstone redevelopment area. Public improvements planned were the reconstruction of Frost
Avenue from Highway 61 to Phalen Place, which includes a roundabout at the intersection of
Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive, sidewalks, decorative street lighting, and landscaping. In
addition, the grant was to help fund the construction of stormwater treatment ponds and devices
to treat stormwater that are currently discharged directly to Lake Phalen without any form of
treatment.
March 12, 2007, the city council approved the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan.
This plan will help guide the redevelopment of the Gladstone area with a mixture of 650 new
housing units and neighborhood retail and commercial uses.
August 13, 2007, the city council approved the following land use requests for The Shores
development:
1. Street Right-of-way vacation
2. Public easement vacation
3. Preliminary Plat
4. Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
5. Design Approval
December 14, 2009, the city council returned the $1.8 million Livable Communities grant to the
Metropolitan Council due to expiring deadlines and a lack of a developer. The city has
resubmitted a request to the Metropolitan Council for this grant now that a developer is lined up.
August 9, 2010, the city council approved the following land use requests for The Shores at Lake
Phalen development:
1. A conditional use permit for a planned unit development within the shoreland overlay
district of Phalen Lake
2. Wetland buffer variance
3. Lot division
4. Design review approval
DISCUSSION
The CDRB reviewed this project at its meeting on June 22,2010. The CDRB recommended
approval for the design plans. The city council ultimately approved the design plans for this
project, but three of the conditions of approval required further review by the CDRB. The
following is an excerpt from the final city council meeting minutes, dated August 8,2010:
f. The lighting and photometric plan is not approved. The applicant must submit a
revised lighting and photometric plan for community design review board approval
which complies with city code and is compatible with the Phase I Gladstone public
improvements.
g. Signage is not approved. The applicant must submit a sign plan for community
design review board approval. The plan must show a monument sign to be
located at the intersection of Frost Avenue and East Shore Drive which announces
the entryway to the Gladstone Neighborhood and any exterior sign age advertising
The Shores at Lake Phalen.
h. Landscape/tree replacement plan is not approved. The applicant must submit a
revised landscape/tree replacement plan for community design review board
approval showing:
1) A tree survey and preservation plan.
2) Landscape plan which shows:
a) . Additional plantings on the south side of the drive leading to the
underground garage and the south side of the driveway accessing
East Shore Drive.
2
b) Preservation of the large cottonwood tree located along Frost
Avenue, adjacent to the former Sf. Paul Tourist Cabin entrance.
c) The location of all proposed ground mechanical units which are
screened by landscaping.
d) The installation of underground irrigation for the landscaped areas.
The applicant should explore the use of conservation sensor
sprinkler devices which will shut off when it is raining.
Lighting
The original lighting plan showed 9 freestanding lights along the perimeter of the site, 3
freestanding area lights around the parking lot, 6 accent lights mounted on the building, and 3
down lights under the front entry canopy. City code requires that illumination from outdoor
lighting be limited to 0.4 foot candles at all property lines and that freestanding lights maintain a
maximum height of 25 feet. The original photometric plan reflected several of the perimeter lights
exceeding the allowable illumination at the property line.
The applicant has submitted a revised photometric plan. This plan shows lights exceeding the
code requirement along the northern property line. However, these lights are being installed in
coordination with the city's public improvements along Frost Avenue, which includes a trail.
Because the city is coordinating the installation there is no concern regarding the 0.4 foot candle
requirement. At the centerline point of Frost Avenue, the illumination will be under 0.4 foot
candles and the property to the north is owned by Ramsey County Parks and Recreation.
The applicant has yet to submit light fixture details but will be required to coordinate with the city
in order to be compatible with the public improvements. To ensure compliance with city code and
compatibility with the Phase I Gladstone pUblic improvements, it is recommended that lighting
fixtures be submitted for city staff review.
Signage
The applicants are proposing a Gladstone gateway monument sign to be located on the northeast
corner of the property. A proposed rendering of this sign is attached to this report. This sign
would be visible to vehicles and pedestrians traveling eastbound on Frost Avenue, prior to
entering the roundabout. This proposed gateway monument sign would be built mainly with brick
and stone accents. Details and location for this sign should be coordinated with the city engineer
during the Phase I public improvements. The applicant is also proposing a monument sign to be
located near the main entryway for the project. This proposed sign would also consist of mainly
brick. It is staff's recommendation that the design of the project monument sign match the design
of the gateway monument sign. The project monument sign will also need to meet all setback
requirements within the sign ordinance.
The Historical Preservation Commission, in its review of this development, recommended that the
previous use of this site as the St. Paul Tourist Cabins be noted somewhere on the exterior of the
building or on the interior of the common spaces. The applicant has yet to submit plans for this
sign. It is recommended that the applicant be required to submit a plan to city staff showing such
a sign being displayed somewhere within the project. All signage will be required to receive sign
permits which are reviewed by city staff.
3
Tree Preservation
At the time of the CDRB's review, the applicant had yet to submit a tree preservation plan. This is
the main impetus for bringing this development back before the CDRB to ensure the tree
preservation ordinance requirements were being satisfied. At the August 9, 2010 city council
meeting, the applicant submitted a tree preservation plan. This plan showed the preservation of
the large cottonwood tree located along Frost Avenue. The applicant also indicated it would pay
into the city's tree fund for any trees removed to satisfy the requirement of the tree preservation
ordinance. The city council approved the payment into the city's tree fund. The applicant's tree
preservation plans are attached to this report for your review.
Landscaping
During the last review, staff had recommended the applicant submit a revised landscape plan that
shows 1) additional landscaping along the drive to the underground garage and along the south
side of the driveway accessing East Shore Drive in order to help shield this area from the
neighboring apartment buildings and future development that could occur to the south of this
proposal: and 2) a plan which shows all proposed ground mechanical units and attempts at
screening those with landscaping.
The applicant has submitted a revised landscaping plan that shows additional landscaping along
the drive to the underground garage and along the south side of the driveway accessing East
Shore Drive. The landscaping plan also displays the preservation of the large cottonwood tree
located along Frost Avenue. The landscaping plan does not show the proposed landscaping
screening for the mechanical units or the installation of underground irrigation for the landscaped
areas. It is recommended the applicant submit a revised landscaping plan showing these two
items for staff's review and to ensure city code compliance.
Building Elevations and Site Plan
The CDRB is not being asked to review any additional elements relating to the building elevations
and site plan proposed for this site. The CDRB did recommend several revisions regarding the
building elevations and trails all of which were approved by the city council. Staff just wanted to
pass this fact on to the CDRB to ensure the board that the applicant will be required to
incorporate the revisions before a building permit can be issued.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Approve the lighting and photometric plan, signage plan and landscape/tree replacement
plan date stamped October 4, 2010, for the 105-unit, three-story The Shores at Lake
Phalen senior housing development to be located at 940 Frost Avenue. Approval is
subject to the applicant doing the following:
a. Submit light fixture details to city staff for approval and coordination with the Phase I
Gladstone public improvements.
b. Submit a revised signage plan displaying the locations and final design of the
Gladstone gateway monument sign and the project entrance sign for staff approval.
The applicant is required to work with city staff to coordinate the two signs with the
Phase .1 Gladstone public improvements.
4
c. Submit a plan for city staff approval showing a location and design for a sign
documenting the site's history as the St. Paul Tourist Cabins.
d. Submit a revised landscaping plan for city staff approval showing:
1. The location of all proposed ground mechanical units which are screened by
landscaping.
2. The installation of underground irrigation for the landscaped areas. The applicant
should explore the use of conservation sensor sprinkler devices which will shut off
when it is raining.
e. All work shall follow the approved plans. City staff may approve minor changes.
5
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site Size:
Existing Land Use:
7.02 Acres
Vacant - Formerly a Manufactured Home Park
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North:
South:
East:
West:
Frost Avenue and Gateway Trail and Keller Golf Course Across the Street
East Shore Drive and Lake Phalen Across the Street
Single Family Houses
Four-Story Apartment Complex
PLANNING
Existing Land Use:
Existing Zoning:
High Density Residential
Medium Multiple Dwelling Residential (R-3M)
PISec161St Paul Tourist Cabin SitelMay24, 2010 SubmitlaIIShore_CDRB_1 0261 0
Attachments:
1. 8 x 11.5 reductions of applicant's plans
2. Applicant's plans (separate attachment)
6
Atlachn:JW:l.l,,1
lII~h
1Il'1!11.
oIp'"
::a ~~ ~~
\ Q. hfHI
'.J"
(f)
~
o
..c,
(/),
Q)l
..c
I-
,
Ii
l;
\,
"
"
"
I,
l!
!"
I
I
I
I
I
..,~~~,..~.~
!l !l'~ ~ ~ , !l !l !l !l ,
..'............,......,
....,...."
......",..,
......,..,....
~ ~ ~J;.. ~.; ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;;;;
, '~"._~ ~ , !l .. , , .. , , ..
".:.;1...,"........"..
"'!l "';>'" , .. .. ~ , , .. ,
,. !l .. ;> ~.., , , , ~ ~ , ,
~ .. ft ~~, ..' .. .. , .... ..,
..,...,.'.........,.. ..;>"
.......,...'....../'....."........
,/"............. ..".."....
.. , .. ;. ...f. ~ ~ , , .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. , .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. , ..
.. , ~ .. .. .. .. ~ ~ , .. , , .. ..
.. .. ~ .. .. , ..., , .. .. .. .. .. ..
~ .. .. .. .. ~ , , , , , ~ ~ .. , , ..
reo,;;..,,'.....v.GI,..h,";''''.I~.,PM
1
~~
<'it
I
I
!
I
!
I-
I
,
l
,
,
.
~"~
.; ~\l~ ~
~: ~ ~ :.
"i- m
~ ~;~ c
'S' t~ .."
; ~iO! p ~
, .
"i ~
!
IC;\ll"""'lM'rio~"IK..'V\Ibo"_cIolRoviIFiIo'\1or.i-M.P~_dSonlO"',tv1
1
~~ ~~ ~'----;{';
q~ u
~ill !I'LI}
,.
~ iCDl
r~l-~
i'T~F.:f
, _l
~ ~~
.. g"
, ,
."
,.
."
Ii:.,
,
,
!
!
,....;::::--1
..<1(,'3'11
i~'[ J!\ ~
'j" i
-/"' ;-
, .
1--- -~""
,
,'~ ~EJ
~i ~ / ~ ~
Ij~ i ~i~!~ ~ ~
"'''''W.'
~~~~~~~a ~
! I ,!I ' \
'G~~I I
!~~cl
!.~:=r;;
I~~ ~
..~1ii ~
g~~ ~
~ll~ ~
~~
'" ,
~ i!
~ ~ !
ill
~~ ~l
~t =1
'!~V~.
'.. '. Iii
! . "
""" ~~ ~~
_ ~-v " i
"
~i
i
I
"
~g
.,
!
,
I~
Ul "'_N~
".
,
o
m
o
o
"-
9.
"
l!
!'
"
hj~
.,
~~
!
0J
~ .
it 1'~?~
1""
~i ~~O!~
Ii:?, ~~~
i IIi
" ~~!l
~ g~~
~ t. 1
--:~ I --:!!! , ,~"" ,
.",g~~~j; ,,~ ~" .'.~ !I:~1___,1
'~llllll \ !Il !II} 'ill'i ilil!i~'
- '.,.. "- I ~
~~~ S'tt-~_.
~ ~
1
--:m!lilll' ''''' '"
iil!L~!I'F,
. . I~
H-o- ~----1
".,: +--=-+
~l I I
;I!y
Attachment 1
:",: t~'''''t
Ij~
.
,
! ~
jii~ ~~~~ii
"II !;'I"
~!li~", ~~~ll"g
~g~ ~~fl~~
-,' -,"
~!lI~ ~I;!Q ~
;1~-ir:rJ.l l~~+m~~J.' ;~';HW'. J' ;:-iHW' --I ;":'1n2
li' 8:;ij ~ P S;!I ~ g f1 W
~ ~m _ ::, i q ~:!i ~ '" ~
~o ~ l {; q ~ q ~
~8 ~ l; !l!l !
;tI ~:; 5"
[il][IOO.[' i! d mil,"
J. '" --J PI J7I\\
ffi~i1i~~Jip~~
ii!!,IH
~~~~~
~g
~~a
"
~...ton
-. D.~
~"I'i'j1'!
. ~~ ml~g~ [ ~
:>l\l'IJ"ge.w
~~~~~~
,I""
~ "'a~~;(l~
i1 ~~~~@~
~ ..;!l~~ ..
~ "-j~~~
, Ii i;;~i::t*.
,I ,."i
ill,li'
II '!',I .
~ ~
~g ~V1-l
~ ~ [~. if
F=~ ~;. if
() {Jl ~ s: <ti
!!: ..g '"
Q"
,~ <Ii
~: ;
il,!
ii: ~r
[ ~~I
~I~
;1~
!
~ll i::!!,......
u!~~ i
- --< >
Ii
it
"'
"
!.f
,
'1 ~l:~~
~~ !l'~~~
I' 5'
,!
I, 'I I,
I! illi
rn
~i
q~
i ~~~
!f ~~!lI
"'I'
'n
"i
l~.
~~
"
;~ a~" '"~
~~ li~ ! ;11 \?
!II ~'l'~ ,',*"
~~~
~~~
r
l: illl"
".~ .
'ljE E? l;
9 ~~ ~2: oE
13 'l!~ 5;1; ,
IIlii'
,
jn~~
fUr
"'...
~
~~
Ii
Attachment 1
tl~9-QW(l%)'X:;JH1l'lOBg(l'.;6)'l1((lHd~
lt~ ~~'mIS>Ol1\ll 'Ullll"S~t~'I.L~'Moog; !iiiiiiI
SOOA3AtlnS / S~33N18N3 / SH3NNIIld I
'OUI 'II!H "M SeWer '
-"""S'~"O
";: ~a;;P
~""~-"".,o,,
"",.,.~.., "'0' ".~...,
""~"'JO""="'''''
W'}J".i',~~.~~~~
,o.)~.., ~"")oouI>>d,
~"" "" "'" ,,,'''''''~;
W>>--Wl.. ~11 'nVd '.is .iS3\\ "3I-.V :n~o~~o 'ij"
DNIAI'I HOIN:!lS JI.:llAH.tllOS
..
NV'ld NOLLVAll~S:rnd ~:rn.t 1VNLJ!
VI053N"~ 'OOOIIl1""fI
S:illfOHS :ilHJ.
> .
. 0 Z
~ '" ~, ~
~ <3 ~s ~
c "
"
~
~ .;
,
z
f">
-
,
~g
~. 0' -
~ ~ .' ~' E 18 - ~ ~
1).'0 Z In. i ,Db .
, '1).0"<!l!0,,~.,
b . ,02 , . . 'bD
.)"f b,/
~,~/-..; ~ , '~0 ,0
" ' . '0'.
0,loP/,' 6 \'-.~'/ , '(A-
q b 'n 0, Y' /.' ;/ ,
b' '1:)'~ . ~I g ~' b ~ \) ""~
!~. ,/ 'bb ,Ioi n- , '~!bb"'~
! ,<h', .. jjb; to' Q ~6>\"',"
" o~cr-'K. ,"'-'. %...,_o_~"."
~ w -- -v' 1---. 1.:i).J~\ \ ~" - ,,- '" \31~ ~. '---' ~
~~,:>.:>:::::> ,- ~,~~- t/\;! I \,,', ~ -/~ .14:1 ~ ,i ~.i t :i~ <~~ '-- '-- ~ ~'>>\:'.\ \
*~,' ,/ ,- '" V \: N ''- "j i j i j i j ~ ~ i ~ " ~ __---.J ~
.. '.! ! : ('0 .). ,J]')- - \' ":'. '. '. . . . '\ ~ ,\ - I.,
~ ~\'.\~" "" '#-jf---' it it ~t it j~ it it it it'l.l Il. ~I {
\ \ \ I, 'I' ,(I,' ~ I \ \ \i' ' . . . < < , < . "'-j --I; -r /~I,Zl-.
''8...\ '.......'. i! .. ' 'I ~ ~', 'j 'j',',',', 'j!~lP:". wB- 151 11/
\':\\\,.:-b "j', II -~~o,,- ~ .~ \ 'i "i\ .~.,I", (j~g';/'ljt!'l
\'if,"1 '\ 'i I " J '*.Mi!~''::'~'-:\~ j j ~ '~i'::-' Ii, 0' !y-(~/
-'"" ' " "'h - '0.;," ~"'j ./1 'r/
" \~\.\'\\.' .\.'.\~) .... b:" / >~~~:~;/ :~, .~!j//I~fI/
\ '0'..' \.' i.... II ' 1) i 'I' \1;)'/ ('1,/(' VI
\ I, '. ,.-,' -',' \" - _ l>~
\\....\..(",i,C,.-;~;'\ \ \~ I ~ L\_ ~ ~-/ 'k~ff'
\iP\\: \' \~\\, h,~ ,'l" t- ~ 0
\', 'i I 'i \ \\ \\ ,', '
\ \ \, Ii \ I I I )
\ ' ' I , ~ '...,,< '),/ \ \ \ J I
Ij) 'I . '0 \ ~\\:,i ! ~1 '1' / / /
b \' \"I"'''--~~ le! ~;;
J \ \ /11 -=-"''f$l--;~ j~ " - ~?;~ {'/
! ,: \~{ /-" / -- --:~'J\f v'>\ ",iA::::::"'j::',/!-
, 't .'.\ "'\V~/\~'.
'0, '" ~\t, "~~_',:\;\~J\.;..".'.t\-h..'..~...(&\~.
>1:\ ""!.;o, 1) ~".. ,j~h/a I. ..'_'
1JV ..'*-'-b 'J {- ,~\
',<~ li!l,;~: ,7J~J!
,i. - _,_ - >?~~./'\ ~.:;~
?~.\.'.'..\J~'::.';;I,(.iz'/'~(//' .
r (1,11\':' - ---'~'J'-<~":.:<'}L~: \--,,;// .'
'\~(.\.'...'\\..\.~\I/'.I~.;~~.\J.(:C;:'/ .. .
~\ \ \ ;/'/(> 'l/':
\>>- \ /'
., ,\ ! -- /,
-~
\
,
I
,
I
)
~
,
~
~
I
o
"
~
00
~P'djQ""
Attachment 1
n71OWd,," _ a o~n",n 04,>4P"
S
~~~~~~rn~~~~*~~~~~ii~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~~i~~M~~gg~i~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~
~
!! ,,'
!'l!'l ."" m m m !'l8 '" m m m '" m '" m :!i:!i '"
"I'II"'I,>.>,~I>.""I,I,III"II~"""""","'111",1,11",1 .>,!!"",.."",2..~
~~~I~~III~^ ~i ~~I^~^~I~~~II~~~XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX~~~XXX~I~~XX~~ 2 MMxXXXX XXXXX~~~~
.
:;: 00;;;;: tl"" ",:; Q,.:::::: '" Q ",. ";:,, 00" '" 0'" "<:'t;: <: ;;;~'t ~'l! - ~"':: "';lj"'''' <:"'~;;;;;; m '" <::;:;;; ""'<:"''' ;;;<:-0; ~'l!Q;;;:;:":;: "',.': 0;"<::1:::: -O;l:l r:.l~;;; ill
~
x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXxxxxxxxxxx
XxxxxxxXXxxx
.
~
m
,
xxx!!!
~
m
~
~~~li~ii~~~~~~~~i~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~*~**~~*~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~
.
~
" " , ." "! II""'" ,,. 1'1 ,um, ~
i1'!""""""!'I"""',,!I""""'I"I""" """'"ll,'llll"l, ~o '1111"m
~~ ^II~^III~IXX ~ ~~k~~~~X~~lxx~~x~~xx~~k ~i~~~I ~~~~~~~xI~BI~~~ob~x~I IiibOOI~
"''''''' ~ ~~"'~ ~ ~~ "'~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~
.
.., '" "'..., m m '" m""' m" m "',,":: 0:: '" Ill..., m"::"", ill'l!"'"' III ~ 'l!:g III f:l Rl Rl 'l! <:" m" ~ 'l1::i:::; Rl;;; lil 'l1 ~ ill Ill::i ~ <::I "l tl:;: '" 0:;: l:l",,,:: 00;'; ill:;: Rl,,;.;;;; -0;"' c" D::;;; ill
o
.
~
.
xxxxxxxxxx!;;;
m
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
~
~
-11-1[-11-1-11-1
O!O 0 0 0 0
-1;-1 -1-1 -11-1
)>!)>.I)>)>)> )>
rr-r-r-r-r-
OO!OZZz
)> te.iJ> C C c:
!: _!: 3: 3:13:
'tI 'tI 'tI tEl tlIltl1
~ ~ ~ ~ gJ'l!ll
- - --0 0 0
Z,Z ZI'TI 'TI ."
QIQ Qi:tl (I)-l
rnilJl rn ~i~ fill
:tI tnl ~!!!IlJl
~ ~I ml-1
Om C':tI
~ Oi ~Irn[
I ,Ill i
II ! II
~!l>>[~i i 11_
wlm ....'lwl-...I 0)
m,O)lm O.U1 U1
! ii' I
' ,
0) wi i
~;-li I I
~I~I I i
~~
N::J o;!l
':;;
o
, '
";;:;-~ e ~
~iTl ^ z:
o .
<
THE SHORES
MAPlEllOOO. M""~ESOTA
FINAL 'TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
~
SOUTHVIEW SENIOR UVlNG
1984 OAl<DAlE AVf.., W;;ST Sf. PAUJ., M~ 55166 4627
Iii~..""""'."....
..<<Uko""'''''<'''''''
"'''.,rn''',,",''m,
.."...p""",.,......"....
F""',,,:'::,''',", ..
g;;/?2 :;~
., .noM .5 ..."
~ James R. Hill, Inc.
PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
25OO\I.CrI.1!tl42,Sto1[12o.81J~~N=1
!'IiOll,,(9,Z)390-6044 flJ.,(9,2)ll90-6244
Attachment 1
_0,"201009,15P"
~ -/p
>- /}/
g .4{
~ , : /ff
""0 -1/
tl1 ;/
~-/~
>- --ff
Z/
,0
,0
'0
z
,
.
~
~
o
~
F 'I' Ilil'l'llI Illill'!~IIII'lllill!I!
",ll.. ,II.. 1"111,
jll'III!i!!iIIII,'!"li'l
I ~ Ii Ii' I' l' ~
.
,
1'~'....,C'.'
""".--.
T -.
~. --'l'.
'.J=_
,iF
I Ill"! I
Illd'l
I ! Ii
r-<
> ",'li'II"","ll m !!lIHljIl'mll~
z !"II!'!IJ'!',lh
~ Ii! Iii :;~J!~
z Iq"llIjl;;~
, Ub!j1i;! Illj!il
II! h II 'j I l!~il
r! ;! ~ I ! i;:l
'IiiI' ..,
.,
"
z
"~
~ ~ ~;
r,
0\::
I ,,'.I~,':
Oij 0' Ir.
oloj();!o lal
0' 00
o 0 0
o 0 8
008. 0(D go
~.o 00 0 "" 0..0 o.
-av,S .
0''-- e. ". 0::>._ cO
o 'El -:-6':---:"-.....:
-,,-., _.0_0"-"
. . '" . . . - " , ~g i " I, ! ; Iii l~ llli~ ,Ill '" ..,I 1'1' !pnl' illlH HHi;jil' !' ""I'Iii Ii !i I' I ij Ii ~~
n , q 00", g ill H d III II II P,ij!" 'l'llI I, H' ',!II'I I! ill <I. I I I' "j. 'in I ·
'" II'! I! I ~ I Ii II j I Iii II!,... illl 'III !Ih' illll!!! i III j11l1111i! ! I111 'II!I! II!!:
II ' ! ,I II' ~ III III i ill 111111 ! I!i !l'! '0 II II I! illllllll! II! III ! !I 11!1 !lll!111 f
" . ' 'Ii ': ! 1 Iii "" I II, Ill' I Id hP ildiq:. ! Ii L II Iq ! II I !
t d f I Hiiiir IL1f lj II II II I P I ill ! Ii II!! h l!lil' illl lUll!!! I/I' !Ill i'!:lll,: I fiHi j II 1'111 ill II
I . , PI 'II i ldlli!' Il1rlH Illl Ii Ii I i l, I' "II ! II! ,i i 'j, i '
, "i' , ",.,. n'''''''' n q q' ! Ill! q Ii ill" il! Ii! 'III! II ! II liP i I U II i !! I n i Ij q
Hr~~~~~H~H HunnH nHd! }htljHipm H ;ll~;nlii Ifl!Uiili It hli
HjiliIHl~:ltHIlIiIPlfnpp~ 11,!:!! HII I,'IIII! II Ii 'II 11111 I,d II! ill II,! ! 'I: illj
I ,,' I ',' I I II II I ,Ill' ii, 'I
, -'! . I II
~
"
~
"
-
v
z
;'1"
~ ii '..... ...,,~f
,I 0> ..~ ,.,.
'; ~ 0 ;.: _
o
~ 11!1 PIl!ll
Ii ljl'i
Ii llllj
" ,!!.
II i'i'
1':8
~~ f!l
~~ I
THE SHORES
ulJ'101l00.M",NESOTA
FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
~
SOUTHVIEW SENIOR LIVING
""OIOOlALEAVL..l\ESTST. PMJL M~ ~'",,_"21
Calyx Design Group, LLC
l."d...p./IfclII..".n....Su...,nobl.D..19n.PI.nnlng
lS6JS.'~oyAve"". SaIrlt.PEllJI,MN5S105
tcIBphone' 651.JJU-l93
I",.""'t wv.w...~gr>grou~"""
........u: IOfv@oatv><<l.'l!Ingroop.ooon
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
James Antonen, City Manager
Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
Maplewood City Hall Campus Plan
October 18, 2010
INTRODUCTION
A campus plan was developed by city staff in 2004 and 2005 and was ultimately approved by
the city council. This campus plan addresses and plans for city hall, the community center, the
public works building and surrounding areas.
DISCUSSION
I
In the last month, a public works crew has started installing a trail connecting the trail along
County Road B East to the Maplewood Community Center and the trail surrounding Wicklander
Pond. Staff wanted to use this as an opportunity to update the community design review board
(CDRB) on the campus plan. Staff will make a presentation on the campus plan, its
development and goals and principles to the CDRB at its meeting on October 26, 2010.
RECOMMENDATION
The CDRB is not being asked to review or make any recommendations regarding the campus
plan. Staff wanted to use the October 26, 2010 meeting as an opportunity to update members
who may have not been aware of the campus plan.