HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-12-02 ENR Minutes
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION
MINUTES
Tuesday, December 2,2008,5:15 p.m.
Council Chambers - Maplewood City Hall
1830 County Road BEast
1. CALL TO ORDER (5:15 p.m.)
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present:
Commissioner Judith Johannessen
Commissioner Carole Lynne
Commissioner Frederica Musgrave
Commissioner Carol Mason Sherrill
Commissioner Dale Trippler
Chair Ginny Yingling
Absent:
Commissioner Bill Schreiner
Staff Present:
Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner
Steve Kummer, Engineer
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Trippler moved to approve the agenda, seconded by
Commissioner Musgrave, all ayes.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Environmental Ordinance (Slopes and Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area)
Planner Finwall prepared a draft ordinance in response to discussion at the
November 6 meeting which was included in the packets.
Engineer Kummer answered questions regarding issues raised at the Nov 6
meeting.
Engineer Kummer said he had spoken with a representative of the DN R who was
unable to give him specifics regarding the origins of the 40 foot setback
requirement. He researched other cities websites and in general found that the
use of a 40 foot setback is common. He believes the reason is to ensure that
development is as far back as possible from a slope or from the top of a bluff so
that the weight of any structure built there does not bear upon the slope.
1
Upon further questioning by commissioners regarding whether a 40 foot setback
was a sufficient distance, Engineer Kummer said that he thought it was prudent
from a structural standpoint. Another area of concern that he mentioned is the
removal of vegetation within the 40 foot buffer.
Planner Finwall called the commission's attention to a handout they were given
about the St. Croix Scenic Wildlife Overlay District in which the 40 foot minimum
is cited for urban areas and she speculated that this may be where the number
came from.
Commissioner Trippler asked if the city requires soil borings close to slopes in
proposed developments to verify soil stability.
Engineer Kummer confirmed this saying that a professional geotechnical study
would be required to confirm that the development would not compromise the
slope.
Commissioner Musgrave asked if Engineer Kummer was aware of any studies
that had been done regarding the impact of housing density upon slopes.
Engineer Kummer said he was not aware of any and suggested researching
other urban areas similar to Minnesota.
Chair Yingling asked if commissioners wanted to consider a graduated approach
to setbacks in order to acknowledge that some areas need more protection than
others.
Commissioner Mason Sherrill stated that the 40 foot setback might not be
acceptable in areas where water and streams cause erosion or in areas with a
greater grade.
Engineer Kummer said that the steepness of the slope was more important than
what is at the bottom of it.
Planner Finwall informed the commission that their printed materials incorrectly
stated there are 27 acres of slopes in Maplewood. The actual number is 270
acres of slope within the 11.695 total acres that make UP the entire City of
Maplewood.
Engineer Kummer noted that approx 2.1 % of the entire area of the city have
grades exceeding 18% which is the benchmark for a "steep slope" as determined
by the State Soil and Conservation Service. He said that the majority of those
slopes are in the southern-most one-square mile of the city.
Planner Finwall clarified that the current ordinance restricts new development if it
is within 40 feet of a bluff line, which is defined as a slope with a grade of 18% or
more that drains into protected waters, such as the Mississippi River.
Commissioner Musgrave moved that a separate section of the Slope ordinance
be created to deal specifically with the Mississippi Critical Area and the Fish
Creek Area, seconded by Chair Yingling. Ayes all.
2
Planner Finwall stated that the Mississippi River Critical Area could have its own
section in the slope ordinance.
Commissioner Trippler expressed concern that the definition of bluff line was
based on the existing shoreland district ordinance. He was uncomfortable with
all of the references to water since this seemed to exclude slopes that are not
adjacent to water.
Planner Finwall noted that the DN R is in the process of redrafting their definitions
regarding shorelands and this would require the city to do likewise. She said she
would try to get more information on what the DNR is planning.
Chair Yingling expressed concern about the use of 18% in relation to slope
grade.
Engineer Kummer said that it is the number used when soil surveys are done. He
also stated that a "significant slope" standard in city construction projects is 25%
or more and that greater slopes (i.e., 3:1) increase concerns about erosion. He
said that the 25% number is appropriate.
Commissioner Musgrave expressed concern that the 25% may be appropriate
for construction but may not be appropriate when taking other things into
consideration such as protection of habitat, etc.
Chair Yingling suggested that they just mull-over the 40 foot setback issue until
the next meeting and move on to the next question.
Engineer Kummer said he could find nothing to justify exempting earth-sheltered
structures in the ordinance since their impact upon a slope should be similar to a
traditional above-ground structure.
Engineer Kummer discussed the proposed ordinance regarding soil erosion. He
read from state statute which states that each city is responsible for adopting a
soil loss ordinance based on the US Soil Conservation Service Field Office
Technical Guide. Based on this, Maplewood's soil losses should not exceed 4 to
5 tons per acre per year for non-vegetative soils.
Commissioner Trippler expressed concern that the numbers primarily related to
farm erosion and may be on the high side. A discussion ensued regarding the
difficulties of measurement and thus enforcement.
Engineer Kummer said he believes the city aggressively enforces erosion control
at construction sites by using qualitative measurements such as whether silt
fences are in place.
Planner Finwall said that the language was placed in city ordinances because the
state required it. She also pointed out that the city must enforce the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency's construction storm water permit requirements and that
should be referred to in the future ordinance.
3
At the conclusion of the discussion, Chair Yingling asked the commission to
review the items discussed and be ready to talk about ways to resolve these
issues at the next meeting. Plus they also need to think about creating the
separate section in the ordinance regarding the Mississippi Critical area and the
Fish Creek Corridor.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Meeting Times - Commissioner Musgrave asked if meetings could be
moved to 7:00 p.m. or some other day because 5:15 p.m. was difficult
with her work schedule. Chair Yingling asked staff to see if there were
any other times available for meeting and report back next month.
7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
a. Ron Cockriel, 943 Century Avenue North, Maplewood, MN. Mr. Cockriel
stated he did not hear anything about the 40-foot setback at the last
meeting. It is simply a viewshed setback requirement. He discussed the
difference between a 17 and 25 percent slope and retaining walls. The
ordinance is about retrofitting a National Park into our city. He wants to
get the commissioners outside the development and planners office to
show what the intent is.
b. Elizabeth Sletten, 2747 N. Clarence St., Maplewood, MN. Are there
plans for a bus tour around they city of Maplewood? She would like any
updates on when they are planning on doing one.
8. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Chair Yingling reviewed a workshop that was held in November regarding setting
priorities and goals for 2009. Three goals were set from the meeting including
storm water as it relates to parking lots and other impervious surfaces, waste
hauling, and greenway corridors.
Chair Yingling said that she had met with Bill Schreiner regarding storm water
runoff. They want to set up a meeting with staff to discuss storm water issues
that have already been identified and determine how the commission should
tackle those issues. They also talked about the use of pervious paving blocks in
parking lots and the need to discuss this with city engineers and planning
commission.
Commissioner Lynne talked about waste hauling and said they want to do
research so that they can determine the best solution for the citizens and get the
most cost effective waste hauling and recycling.
Commissioner Mason Sherrill talked about greenways and said that they plan to
do fact-finding regarding the corridors in January.
Commissioner Musgrave raised a question regarding open meeting laws and her
concern that the subcommittees do not encourage or allow participation by the
public.
4
Chair Yingling explained that the purpose of the subcommittees was to research
ideas and not to formulate policy. She also felt that this allowed more work to be
done thus making it possible for the commission to have the time to talk about
the bigger issues.
Commissioner Musgrave asked that the City Attorney rule on the legality of the
subcommittees. She also asked for more documentation of meetings with staff
so that citizens could be kept informed.
Commissioner Mason Sherrill said that as a volunteer commission member she
found the information being asked for by Commissioner Musgrave was intrusive
and accusatory and that she was not comfortable with the suggestion that what
was being done was subversive.
9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
a) December 11, 2008, (6:30 to 8:30 p.m. at the Maplewood Community
Center) University of Minnesota Environmental Policy Capstone Project -
Final Presentation on Sustainable Maplewood
b) December 9, 2008, Friends of Maplewood Nature Board Meeting (6:30
p.m. at the Nature Center)
c) Nature Center Programs are listed on the City's website.
d) The next Environmental Commission meeting is scheduled for Jan 6th at
5:15 p.m. The south Maplewood stop gap ordinance will be reviewed
during this meeting.
10. MEETING ADJOURNED (6:55 p.m.)
5