Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/10/1991~G~D& MAPLEWOOD HOUBING 2staid REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORZTY DECEMBER 10, 1991 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL ~PLENOOD ROOM 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes a. November 12, 1991 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Communications 6. Unfinished Business a. Housing Plan Update 7. New Business a. Cottages of Maplewood West (1) Land Use Plan Change, Conditional Use Permit and Parking Reduction (2) Tax-exempt and tax-increment financing 8. Date of Next Meeting a. January 14, 1992 9. Adjournment I~'I'NUTES OF THE I~PLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPI~NT AUTHOR~'TY NOVEMBER ~2, '1991 CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL HRA Commissioners: Lorraine Fischer, Larry Whitcomb, Lori Tauer City Staff: Ken Roberts APPROVAL OF MINUTES ae October 8, 1991 Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the minutes of October 8, 1991, as submitted. Commissioner Tauer seconded Ayes--Fischer, Whitcomb, Tauer APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the amended agenda, deleting item 7 a, unless another Commissioner is present at the meeting. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes--Fischer, Whitcomb, Tauer Se ® COMMUNICATIONS Metro HRA - two letters The Commission had a brief discussion on the two letters. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ae Rental Housing Maintenance Code Ken Roberts presented the staff report. The Commissioners discussed the revisions proposed. suggested that "workmanlike" be replaced in the document with a nonsexist term. It was HRA Minutes of 11-12-91 -2- Commissioner Whitcomb moved approval of the revised Rental Housing Maintenance Code and replacing, if possible, the term "workmanlike,, with a non-sexist term. Commissioner Tauer seconded Ayes--Fischer, Whitcomb, Tauer Commissioner Tauer moved to recommend to the City Council: 1. Do not require licensing at this time but continue our present inspection program, including special inspections of individual units in problem buildings as time permits. ® 2. Continue to require compliance with the rental housing code as part of the City's truth-in-housing program. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes--Fischer, Whitcomb, Tauer Ken Roberts presented information requested by the Commission pertaining to the truth-in-housing ordinance requirements regarding the number of multiple-dwellina rental unit inspections required at the time a building is sold. It was decided to further discuss this at the time that the truth-in-housing ordinance is updated. NEW BUSINESS a. Housing Plan Update The revised housing plan was explained briefly by Ken Roberts. It will be added to the December meeting agenda for consideration at that time. b. Larpenteur'East Apartments The Commission discussed past complaints and court actions on this property. DATE OF NEXT MEETING a. December 10, 1991 ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. TO: FROM: SUBJECT DATE: City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Housing Plan Update November 27, 1991 XNTP. ODO~'"TXON I have attached a copy of th? housing plan from t.h.e Comprehensive Plan revision. The HRAoriglnally reviewed and discussed this plan in 1990. The HRA adopted the housing plan at their June 12, 1991 meeting. The attached copy is the latest version of that plan. It has up-to-date census information and the latest HRA and staff comments. The HRA should review this document and make a recommendation about it as part of the Comprehensive Plan update process. I have also attached a copy of the goals from the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commision asked the HRA to comment on the Housing Goal. The HRA should make any changes to the Housing Goal that they feel are necessary. Lastly, I have attached a copy of a letter from Bob Overby at the Metropolitan Council. In this letter, he has assembled some preliminary informal comments about the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan update. I have circled their comments about the Housing Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Approve the Housing Goal. 2. Approve the Housing Plan for the Comprehensive Plan revis~on. kr/memoS4.mem Attachments: 1. Plan Goals 2. Housing Plan Update 3. 10-30-91 letter from Bob Overby GOALS OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Maplewood has developed a set of community-wide goals. They are the basis for the City's planning and development efforts. 'These goals are: Human Rights Goal: The City will positively identify itself as a community that includes and respects all individuals and groups within it. There should not be limitations or discrimination based on religion, age, income, sex, ethnic background or political belief. The City will protect each citizen's rights and encourage them to exercise their responsibilities as citizens. Citizen Involvement Goal: The decisions and actions of City government should consider the needs and desires of its citizens. The City will provide a wide range of opportunities for citizen participation and community involvement in local decisions. Communication Goal: The City will encourage and promote communication with the public to achieve a high level of citizen participation and community involvement. City Implementation Goal: The City will use a rational and democratic system to help the city's citizens, council and management decide about the use of resources. These decisions should help the City achieve it's goals. In order to accomplish the goals listed above, the City has developed the following additional goals: Cultural-Leisure Activity Goal: The City will encourage or provide opportunities for cultural and leisure activities for all citizens. Economic Goal: The City will provide a supportive climate for business consistent with orderly development and planning. Employee Goal: The City will provide and develop highly- motivated, professional, experienced, productive and well-trained employees with high morale and with a stake in the City's future. 7 Finance Goal: The City will finance its activities in a manner which fosters the City's growth, improves the citizens' lives and assures the City's financial stability. Health and Welfare Goal: The City will encourage the development and availability of activities that protect the health and welfare of its citizens. Housing Goal: The City will.encourage a variety of housing which provides for a choice of type, location, price and ownership versus renting. Housing should be safe, sanitary, secure, comfortable, free from blight, next to public streets and utilities, and near schools and Metropolitan Goal: The City will actively participate in finding solutions to metropolitan problems which affect the City or it's citizens. Public Services and Infrastructure Goal: The City will provide and maintain comprehensive, high-quality and cost-effective public services. The City will provide these services in a fair and democratic way. Safety and Social Order Goal: The City will provide an environment to enjoy life in peace and freedom of fear from criminal acts and preventable disasters. · Significant Natural Features Goal: The City will preserve, conserve and use wisely its significant natural features. Transportation Goal: The City will have a transportation system which is safe, efficient, minimizes disruption, promotes better land development, improves the aesthetic appearance of the City and reduces air pollution. This system should provide lransportation opportunities for citizens without cars. Urban Design Goal: The City will strive to improve the appearance of the City, maintain compatible land uses, and encourage a sensitive integration among activities, man-made facilities and the natural environment. These are the City's overall goals. There are also specific goals and policies in each of the Comprehensive Plan elements. 8 HOUSING PLAN PURPOSE The intent of the Housing Plan is: · Describe the current housing stock. · Quantify the number of housing units by type. · Set goals for affordable housing and a mix of housing types. · Identify strategies for achieving those goals. HOUSING STOCK The overall condition of the City's housing units is good, although there are small areas that have houses with the potential to deteriorate. To prevent this, the City adopted a housing maintenance code which enables officials to require owners to maintain and make basic repairs to their structures. Construction During the 1980s A total of 2,894 housing units were built during the 1980's in Maplewood. Slightly more than 50 percent of these were townhouse, duplex and other multi-family units. There are a total of 12,120 housing units in the Gity (1990 Census), with single-family detached units representing about 63 percent (7636 units) of the housing stock. (See Table 10.) 1988 data from the Metropolitan Council reveals that 21 percent of Maplewood's housing stock was built between 1980 and 1988. Although this figure is comparable to the Metropolitan Area average, it is more than twice the rate for other inner-ring suburbs. 55 TABT.I~. 10 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS 1980 1990 1980 1990 CHARACTERISTIC MAPLEWOOD MAPIJEWOOD METRO METRO AREA AREA Total Number of Housing Units 9,042 12,120 796,508 922,224 Units by Type of Occupancy - Owner-Occupied 74% 76% 66% 64% Renter-Occupied 26% 24% 34% 31% Households by Type of Occupancy - Owner-Occupied 74% 69% 66% 68% Renter-Occupied 26% 31% 34% 32% Median Value of Owner-Occupied Units $64,600 $87,800 $64,100 Median Rent $281 $473 $507 Persons in Units Lacking Complete 0.37% 0.77% Plumbing Number of Vacant, 3 units 13 units Boarded Units (0.03%) (0.10%) 0.01% 0.1% 56 TABLE 10 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS (Continued) INNER-RING METRO CHARACTERISTIC MAPLEWOOD SUBURBS AREA Rental Units Vacant for 6 Months or More (1980) 0.26O/o 0.26% Year Housing Units Built, 1989 Pre - 1940 6°/6 8% 22% 1940 - 1959 28% 37% 22% 1960 - 1979 45% 45% 39% 1980 - 1989 21% 11% 17% Housing Units by Type, 12-31-88 Single-Family 63% 64% 61% Multi-Family 25% 31% 34% Townhouse 6% 3% 4% Manufactured Housing 6% 2% 2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau Metropolitan Council Apartment Profiles, Median Rent, 3/90 57 While the number of manufactured homes in Maplewood declined in the late 1970's, this trend reversed in the 1980's with the addition of 375 new units. The City now has five manufactured home parks containing 751 units, which represents 6 percent of the Gity's housing stock. This rate is three times higher than that found in other inner- ring suburbs or in the Metro Area. Owner-Occupied Versus Renter-Occupied Housing Unit~ Maplewood has a higher than average percentage of owner-occupied housing units than in the Metro Area or in other first-ring suburbs. In 1980, 74 percent of the units were owner-occupied; down from 79 percent in 1970. The 1990 Gensus showed an increase to 76 percent from the 74 percent in 1980 in the percentage of home ownership. Housing Affordability The price and rent of Maplewood housing is only slightly above the metropolitan mean and median. There is also a diversity of styles and price ranges. Older homes on smaller lots provide opportunities for first-time buyers in the Western Hills, Parkside and Gladstone neighborhoods. Opportunities for low- and moderate-income households are available in manufactured home parks and in a variety of types and locations of multiple dwellings. The move-up housing market is particularly strong with such choices available throughout the Gity. Buyers can find more expensive housing in the Vista Hills, Highwood and Kohlman Lake neighborhoods. Housing Assistance The Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority manages the Rehabilitation Loan Program, the Section 8 and Section 236 Rental Assistance Programs. In 1990, the Section 8 Rent Assistance Program helped 173 households (35 senior and 138 family), which represents a small portion of the low-income households living in Maplewood. This program does not come close to meeting the need for affordable housing in Maplewood or elsewhere. This is because the Federal Government has reduced levels of funding annually throughout the 1980s. Moreover, the 1990's may also witness the expiration of many long-term Federal contracts with landlords for the set-aside of units used in this program. 58 In addition to the individual system of vouchers, there are four complexes providing subsidized housing for families and the elderly: Archer Heights, 1816 Beebe Road; Maplewood Gardens, 410 South McKnight Road; Maple Knolls, 1880 Mesabi Road (south of Radatz between White Bear and Southlawn); and Concordia Arms, 2030 Lydia. Information on the current number and type of subsidized housing units is shown on the accompanying Tables 11 and 12. Maplewood participates in four loan programs funded by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and managed by local lenders. These include the Home Improvement Loan Program, the Home Energy Loan Program, the MHFA Single-Family Mortgage Loan Program, and the Home Ownership Assistance Fund. Maplewood has also provided money to the Share-a-Home program managed by the Lutheran Social Services Administration. This program matches individuals looking for an inexpensive place to live with elderly homeowners who need help to remain in their homes. Development Ordinances The Maplewood Zoning Ordinance includes seven districts which permit single-family detached housing. The minimum lot areas range from 7,500 to 40,000 square feet. The R-2 district also allows two- family dwellings, and the R-3 district permits multi-family developments ranging upwards from four units per acre. In recent years, the City has adopted many ordinances which effect development and housing. These include a Shoreland Overlay District to protect shoreland areas, an Environmental Protection Ordinance to protect areas of significant natural features, a pipeline setback ordinance to protect buildings from pipeline leaks, and a housing maintenance code. The City has also adopted a "truth-in-housing" ordinance. The City designed this ordinance to help purchasers make an informed decision and may also promote privately negotiated housing repairs at the time of sale. The City requires sellers to have an inspection done which discloses information about the property, and highlight any potential repair needs or housing code deficiencies. 59 TABLE 11 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UNITS, 1990 Community Maplewood Ramsey County Metro Area Privately Owned Housing: Mixed Elderly Total Public Housing: Mixed ~ldeHy Total 138 35 173 188 193 381 1,630 2,594 4,224 3,345 2,511 5,856 3,508 8,554 12,062 10,731 8,663 20,394 Certificates and Vouchers Mixed I~l~lerly Total 144 36 180 2,371 982 3,353 8,156 3,154 11,910 Total Subsidized Units: Mixed Elderly Total 332 229 561 7,346 6,087 13,433 22,99521,371 44,366 Source: "Changes in the Subsidized Houeing Market in theTwin Cities Metropolitan Area, 1980-1989," Twin Cities Metropolitan Council TABLE 12 SECTION 8 AND SECTION 236 UNITS Archer Maplewood Maple Type of Unit HeiRhts Gardens Knolls Concordia Arms Totals Family Units One Bedroom 30 - 3 - 33 Two Bedroom 55 13 32 - 100 Three Bedroom 4 16 20 - 40 Handicapped .- -- ~2 -- ~ 89 29 57 - 175 Elderly Units One Bedroom 64 124 188 Source: City of Maplewood, 1990 60 New Housing The addition of nearly 2,900 housing units from 1980 through 1989 increased the supply of housing by 30 percent. Still, nearly 22 percent of the land planned for residential use remains undeveloped, providing areas for continuing new construction in the coming years. Much of this land is in the City's southern 'leg." The undeveloped land is the reason the Metropolitan Council projects a population increase of 19 percent between 1980 and 2000. This compares with a 0.8 percent growth rate for all inner-ring suburbs. As development continues, though, the available land will be increasingly difficult to develop because of environmental constraints, such as steep slopes, poor soils, or wetlands. The challenge for the City will be to continue to allow for the development of a range of housing options for its citizens on the undeveloped sites. Expected Housing Market Trends In recent years, the Metropolitan Council has produced several studies examining potential changes in the region's demographics and what these changes might mean for the housing market. This research suggests that major changes in the composition of the population will affect the nation and the state over the next ten to thirty years. These changes will also affect the Twin Gities and Maplewood. The large group of baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1965, sharply boosted housing production during the 1970's and 1980s as they formed new households. A generation has followed the baby boomers that is smaller in numbers. As these two groups move through their life-cycles, they will change the housing market: There may be less demand for rental housing as the typical renter age group moves into owner-occupied structures. On the other hand, the elderly may be looking to move from owner- occupied units to rental units. This may off-set the decline in non-elderly rentals. There should be less demand for new housing by the late 1990's because there will be fewer new households. As a result, it may become more difficult to sell entry-level housing. Household composition may shift. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that, between 1985 and 2000, 69 percent of the growth in new households will be in nontraditional households. Almost 14 percent will be in female, single-parent families whose median income is less than half the regional median. Of these, more than 30 percent will be living in poverty. This may not only affect the housing market, but may also place a greater strain on the public to provide more affordable housing options. There may be less subsidized housing. The changing household structure is occurring when the future of much of the region's subsidized housing is unclear. During the 1990's, more than 5,000 contracts for subsidized units between the federal government and investment housing owners will expire. It is unknown whether or not the Federal government will replace these contracts. Rehabilitation needs may increase. The Metropolitan Council estimates that by 2000, 30 percent of Maplewood housing stock will be more than 40 years old and 6 percent will be more than 60 years old. This trend, coupled with lower revenues from higher vacancy rates, may make rental property more difficult to maintain. However, reduced demand may give consumers more leverage, requiring landlords to provide a more competitive product. The need for elderly housing is increasing and may increase sharply as the baby boomers begin to reach their 60s, starting after 2006 and peaking after 2025. Between 1990 and 2000, the regional population will have grown by five percent and the baby boomers will be between ages 35 and 64. Additionally, the percentage of young adults in the region will decrease by 2000. Maplewood and the developing suburbs will continue to grow, although slower than the previous decade. This is because the number of annual housing starts will be about half what it was in the 1980s. By 2010, the baby boomers will be between the ages of 45 and 64 and their children will be entering the housing market. Growth in Maplewood and the developing suburbs may continue to slow and some may experience problems similar to those now faced by the central cities. It may become more difficult to sell a home, and buyers 62 may have many choices. Baby boomers may force the housing market to produce more and better housing for this group. Further details, on the future of the Twin Cities housing market are available in "Looking Ahead at Housing...The Effect of Changing Demographics on the Twin Cities Area Housing Market," Twin Cities Metropolitan Council, 1988. 63 HOUSING ISSUES The following are City housing issues: · What steps should the City and its Housing and Redevelopment Authority take to increase the amount of affordable housing? · Is the City planning enough land for alternative housing types? If not, what changes should the City make? What steps can the City take to prevent its older housing and neighborhoods from deteriorating? What strategies can the City develop to assure that developers build a variety of housing styles and types in both new developments and infill development projects? Are there adequate public services and facilities within each neighborhood to meet the needs of existing and planned populations? · How can the City preserve some of its natural features and beauty as the community grows? Will future housing meet the needs of the increasing number of nontraclitional households, particularly single-parent families? HOUSING GOALS AND POLICIES Housing Affordability Housing costs continue to rise throughout the region as a result of a variety of reasons. These include increasing land and construction costs, utilities and taxes; declines in government aid programs; and, indirectly, land use regulations. These cost increases have the greatest effect on low-and moderate-income households. The Metropolitan Council has a regional goal that 63 percent of the housing in each commun/ty should be low-to-modest cost un/ts. Metropolitan Council figures show that Maplewood came very close to meeting this goal in 1980, with 59 percent of its housing classified as low-to-modest cost. The 1990 Census shows that Maplewood exactly met the goal of having 63 percent of/ts housing (7684 units) 64 of low-to-modest cost. The City will continue to try to meet this goal with the following policies: Financing The City, through its Housing and Redevelopment Authority, will explore all avenues for financing affordable housing, including: Use of tax-exempt and tax-increment financing. Programs, including grants, loans and federal tax credits, available through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. - Programs available through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. - Programs available through the Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority. - Community Development Block Grants and other programs Rental Assistance The City, through the HRA, will continue to participate in rental assistance programs, indudlng those available through the Metropolitan HRA and the federal government. Energy Efficiency The City will promote energy effident improvements in residences to help keep them affordable. The City will provide information and, when available, finandal help for both owner- occupied and rental units. 65 HOUSING DIVERSrI~ Most of Maplewood's housing is single-family homes. The Metropolitan Council has a goal calling for each community to provide 41 percent of its housing stock in housing types other than single- family homes. From 1980 to 1986, housing in Maplewood, other than single-family homes, increased from 31.5 percent of the housing stock to 35.0 percent. The City will continue to work toward this goal with the following general policy: Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the City. These are to meet the life-cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and non-traditional households. The City also adopts the following specific housing diversity policies: Land Use Plan The City will continue to provide ~ locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land use plan. Ordinance Provisions · The City will review and, as necessary, change its zoning and subdivision regulations to assure that they are flexible enough to allow a variety of housing options. Housing for the Elderly and Disabled · The City will make efforts to plan and provide for the housing and service needs of the elderly and disabled. Nontmditional Households · The City will encourage development of housing and services which meet the needs of nontraditional households. 66 NEIGHBORHOOD QUAI.ITY' The City feels that alternate housing must be compatible with the character of existing neighborhoods and respect the environment. It is also important to prevent housing in older neighborhoods from deteHoratin, g. Much of this housing was built before Maplewood became a village, when building codes were not in place. There are also deteriorating housing units scattered throughout the City. In the future, these units may become less attractive to home buyers, thereby depreciating housing values. Figure 15 identifies the areas in Maplewood of most concern. To address these concerns, the City adopts the following policies: 1. Plan and design new housing to: · Protect existing housing, natural neighborhood identity and quality. · Assure there are adequate utilities, community facilities and convenient shopping. Maintain or strengthen the character of established neighborhoods and assure that all housing units are safe, sanitary, secure and free from blight. The City also adopts the following neighborhood quality policies: Ordinance Provisions The City will protect residential neighborhoods and reduce potential negative effects of commercial or industrial land uses through zoning, site plan review and code enforcement. The City will require high design and rnalnt~nance standards for multi-family development. Design standards will include provisions about building massing, architectural design, off- street parking ratios and location, access, traffic impacts, landscaping, fencing or screening, and trash handling. 67 · The City will plan affordable housing .for locations suitable for other residential uses. FIGURE 23 - HOUSING DETERIORATION Environmental Considerations The City will assure that new development respects the natural environment to the maximum extent practical. The City will continue to use its Shoreland, Floodplnln and Environmental Protection Ordinnnces tO assure protection of lakes, streams, ponds, wetlands, steep slopes and woodlots. Homing Maintenance Code The City will continue to encourage the maintenance of its housing through its housing maintenance codes. The City's truth-in-housing program should also encourage housing maintenance. Maintenance Assistance The City, through its Housing and Redevelopment Authority, will partidpate in programs to help property owners with home maintenance and improvements through loans and, ff available, HOUSING ACHON PLAN Table 13 on the following page lists activities that the City should undertake to carry out the Housing Plan. 69 TABLE 13 HOUSING A~ON PI.AN Action Explore all options for financing affordable housing Continue to provide rent assistance to needy households Provide information and assistance to encourage energy efficiency improvements Provide dispersed locations for variety of housing types, styles, prices Review and update Codes to facilitate housing variety Provide for the housing and service needs of the elderly and disabled Provide housing and services to meet the needs of non-traditional households Protect integrity of, and prevent deterioration in, existing neighborhoods Encourage high design and maintenance standards for multi- family housing Responsibility HRA, Dir of CD HRA, Dir of CD, CC HRA, Dir of CD PC, CC PC, CC, Dir of CD HRA, PC, CC HRA, CC PC, CD PC, CC, CD Timinq Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Fundinq CDBG, TIF, EFB, MHFA, other local state, and federal programs Section 8 Program, other state and federal programs State and federal programs None None State and federal program State and federal programs None None Coordinate with Land Use Plan, Metro HRA Metro HRA Metro HRA Land Use Plan Land Use Plan Metro HRA, Land Use Plan Land Use Plan Land Use Plan 7O TABLE 13 HOUSING ACTION PLAN (Continued) Action Assure that new development is compatible with, and sensitive to, the environment Continue to enforce housing maintenance code Participate in rehabilitation, and grant programs Develop progroms to help first-time home buyers Responsibility Timinq Fundinq PC, CC, Ongoing None Dir of CD Dir of CD Ongoing HI{A, Dir of CD Ongoing HRA, CC, Ongoing Coordinate with Land Use Plan GF CDBG, State of Minnesota GF Metro HRA, Romsey County Land Use Plan ABBREVIATIONS: HRA = Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority PC = Planning Commission CC = City Council Dir of CD = Director of Community Development CDBG = Community Development Block Grant Funds (federal) TIF = Tax increment financing EBF: Essential bond financing GF = General fund MHFA = Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 71 0 POTENTIAL Db-rEF~D~ATION Areas of Potential Housing Deterioration COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Figure 23 ML'~I'ROPOLITAN COUNCIL Meats Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101 612-291-6359 DATE: October 30, 1991 TO: Geoff Oison FROM: Bob Overby SUBJECT: INFORMAL COMMENTS ON DRAFF MAPLEWOOD PLAN UPDATE [,and Use The land use plan element does not include the regional context for local planning in the city. The city might consider discussing the MDIF, its policies for the Developing Area, and possible implications for Maplewood and its Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Forecasts - Bob Davis (291-6317), Michael Munson (291-6331) While the Maplewood employment forecasts are slightly higher than the Council's forecasts, the difference is minor. The Council's revised forecasts may be somewhere in between the current Council numbers and the city's numbers. Thc difference is less than 10 percent. In order to maintain a fair and technically valid forecasting process, the Council will not directly incorporate thc city's numbers but it will use the information as part of the revision process. //~ousin~ - Audrey Dougherty (291-6380) The city has done an excellent job in preparing its housing plan. By identifying expected trends in \ the housing market, relevant housing issues, and housing goals and policies, they have addressed the subject quite completely. The plan also clearly defines the activities that the city will take to implement the housing plan. The plan provides information on housing characteristics and an analysis of how the city compares to other inner-ring suburbs and the entire Metro Area. This data is primarily from 1980 and does not accurately reflect the current situation. The city should substitute 1990 Census data as soon as /~ ~.~ available. .Parks - Florence Myslajek (291-6520) The plan provides a good, thorough analysis of local recreation needs, a good inventory of facilities, and discussion of future needs. A portion of Battle Creek Regional Park is located within the city of Maplewood. Except for a coded symbol on the map on page 86, there is no discussion of this regional park. The plan should acknowledge the existence of Battle Creek Regional Park as part of the Regional Recreation Open Space System and include a brief description of how the park's recreational opportunities affect the residents of Maplewood. LAND USE PLAN PURPOSE The Land Use Plan interrelates with all elements, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the Land Use Plan is to designate the type, location and density of land uses in the City. In doing this, the City considered the following items: a. Community goals and objectives. b. Natural Features. Supportive elements, such as transportation, drainage systems and utilities. d. Existing and future problems. Coordination with surrounding communities and metropolitan facilities. The City government has a strong influence on the way a community develops. Community facilities and laws can stimulate or retard development. While the workings of the real estate market help determine the uses of land, these uses are regulated by City government. The City is the only entity with an opportunity to coordinate overall development in the City. The following are the City's overall land use goals: · Provide for orderly development. · Protect and strengthen neighborhoods. 21 · Promote economic development that wm expand the property tax base, increase jobs and provide desirable services. · Preserve significant natural features where practical. · Minimize the land planned for streets. · MinimiT~ conflicts between land uses. · Prevent premature use, overcrowding or overuse of land, especially when supportive services and facilities, such as utilities, drainage systems or streets, are not available. · Provide a wide variety of housing types. · Provide safe and attractive neighborhoods and commercial community · Integrate developments with open space areas, facilities and significant natural features. · Maintain and upgrade environmental quality needed, reclassify land uses. GENERAL DEVEI.OPMF~NT POLICIES and, where The following general development policies are intended to implement the previous goals: · The City will not approve new development without providing for adequate public facilities and services, such as streets, utilities, drainage and parks. · Safe and adequate access will be provided for all properties. · Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact on adjolni~lg developments. · Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man-made or natural barriers. 22 The City requires aH development to meet state and federal laws, including Minnesota Pollution Control AgencY (MPCA) regulations, unless a variance is obtained from the regulating agency. The City may require that a developer do sound tests to verify compliance with MPCA regulations. The City requires drainage and erosion control plans with new developments. Such plans shall not increase the rate of runoff and shah prevent erosion. Grading and site plans should preserve as many significant natural features as practical. The City will not remove land from the tax rolls unless it is in the public interest. The City supports the improvement, replacement or redevelopment of substandard or incompatible development. The City coordinates its planning with neighboring communities. The City applies its development policies and ordinances consistently and uniformly. The City coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood. The City regulates development near or the alteration of natural drainage systems to manage storm water runoff. The City uses the Ramsey County Soil Survey to identify areas with soils that are not suitable for building sites. The City may require the developer to furnish evidence from a registered soils engineer that areas with problems can be developed as proposed. The City considers the recommendations of the four Watershed organizations in the review of development requests. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The following are the City's residential development policies: Plan residential neighborhoods, with schools and parks as the hub. Natural or man-made physical barriers should not traverse, but set the boundaries of the neighborhood. Include a variety of housing types for aH types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic, racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, townhouses, manufactured homes, single-family housing, public-assisted housing and low and moderate income housing, and rental and owner-occupied housing. Disperse low- and moderate-income developments throughout the City, rather than concentrating them in one area or neighborhood. Such housing should be near to bus lines. · Support innovative subdivision and housing design. · Protect neighborhoods from activities which produce excessive noise, dirt, odors or which generate heavy traffic. · Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIFS The following are the City's commercial and industrial development policies: · Group comPatible businesses in suitable areas. · Provide attractive surroundings in which to shop and work. · Require adequate off-street loading facilities. · Promote the joint use of parking areas, drives and trash containers. · Avoid disruption of adjacent residential areas. 94 Use planned unit developments (PUl)s) wherever practical. Maintain orderly transitions between commercial and residential Require commercial and industrial developers to make aH necessary improvements to ensure compatibility with surrounding residential uses. Require adequate screening or buffering of new or expanded commercial areas from any adjacent existing or planned residential development. Restrict commerc~ development which will result in tramc volumes which are beyond the capacity of the road systemg or generate excessive noise or pollution as def'med by state standards. · Plan land uses and streets to route non-residential traffic around residential neighborhoods. EXISTING LAND USE The City has a variety of land uses, ranging from a regional mall to parks and open space. Table 3 gives a breakdown by acreage and relative percentage of the basic land use classifications from 1975 - 1984. TABLE 3 LAND USE TRENDS, 1975 - 1984 1975 Residential 3506 30 ..... (al! types) Single Dwellings - - 3438 30 3503 30 Multiple Dwellings - - 181 2 213 2 Public & Recreation 1646 14 .... Public & Semi-Public - - 638 5 640 6 Recreation - - 1023 9 1023 9 Streets 298 3 298 3 317 3 Industrial 361 3 389 3 401 3 Commercial 425 4 459 4 530 5 Lakes 410 3 410 3 410 3 Undeveloped 4908 43 4718 41 4517 39 % of % of % of Total 1980 Total 1984 Total Source: Metropolitan Council Figure 6 is a map of the 1991 pattern of land use. Residential Land Use Most of the City's residential development is single dwellings. They make up 30 percent of the total land area. The rest of the residential land is a mixture of multiple dwellings and manufactured home parks. Most of the older homes are in the Gladstone Neighborhood. They are 1-1/2 story expansion homes built after World War II. The City has recently seen the construction of higher-valued homes in the lower leg and the area northwest of Kohlman Lake. The City has a variety of multiple dwellings, ranging from owner- occupied condominiums to rental apartments. In addition, there are four manufactured home parks. Commercial Land Use Maplewood has been one of the top cities in the metro area in retail building permit valuation over the last 10-15 years. The primary commercial center in the City is the Maplewood Mall area which is at White Bear Avenue and 1-694. This mall provides regional, as well as 26 EHENSIVE PLAN EXISTING LAND USE [] VACANT [] LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL [] MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL [] OPEN SPACE, RECREATIONAL CEMETERIES [] PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC BUILDINGS [] COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL JULY, 1991 27 o Cityof Maplewood c ' i" ~UNDEVELOPED LAND Planned Residential Uses COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12/31/90 Figure 7 City of Maplewood , i ' '-- "~ 'z N .-.---_._~--_.; v.:v..::::: ii. -. · , ~..,, ,.~,.j,.~. . . : : : :. ; ; ; .~ . . r~ __ [ =~ .--.-..'.-.T....-...~ -.'.'_'._.,.~. . j UNDEVELOPED LAND Planned Commercial/Industrial Uses ""~ , COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ". 12/31/90 ..... '~'- f--"~ · ,~ i' 29 Figure 8 community shopping. It has generated additional retail development around it. The City also has smaller shopping centers at Rice Street and Larpenteur Avenue, White Bear and Gervais Avenues, White Bear and Larpenteur Avenues, Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road, and Highway 36 and English Street. There are several other areas with separate commercial buildings. The area along Highway 61, north of Highway 36 to White Bear Lake, is known for its car dealerships. Industrial Land Use The City does not have an industrial park. The largest industrial use is the 3M Company. Maplewood is the world headquarters for 3M. They use the Maplewood campus for corporate office, research and development buildings. There is additional light industrial and warehouse uses along Highway 36. Public and Semi-Public Use This classification includes municipal buildings, schools, churches, non- profit clubs and hospitals. Maplewood is home for St. John's Hospital Northeast, which has been steadily expanding for several years. O_~n Space and Recreational Uses The City has a variety of open space and recreational uses. This includes parks, wetlands and cemeteries. The parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the recreational uses in detail. The County has also purchased a significant amount of land for parks and along drainage areas for permanent open space. Undeveloped Land In spite of being a first-ring suburb, the City has a surprising amount of undeveloped land left. About 24 percent of the City is still undeveloped. The City has planned most of the undeveloped land for residential use. Table 4 shows the acreage of land by neighborhood and by land use that is undeveloped. Figures 7 and 8 show where the undeveloped land is. 3O LAND USE PLAN The City land use plan: · Incorporates the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan into a spatial arrangement of land use patterns. · Implements the neighborhood planning concept. · Considers the existing land use pattern, the topography and physical features of the community. · Coordinates and relates the City's major street plan with the land use plan. · Includes the community facilities necessary to serve the planned land uses. · Plans residential uses as. the major land use within the City. · Provides enough area for commercial development to accommodate the population. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING CONCEPT The Plan identifies thirteen neighborhood planning areas. However, the City has planned each neighborhood to fit into the community-wide plan for the City. The City has planned its neighborhoods because of: The need to recognize the physical impediments, such as freeways, lakes, railroads and political boundaries, which delineate areas of the City. · The need to strengthen citizen identity with their neighborhood. The need to provide a focal point for bringing people together to discuss local problems of mutual concern and thereby develop stronger citizen involvement in community affairs. · 2oos 31 TABLE 4 NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN LEGEND Residential Land Uses RE-40 RE-30 RE-20 R-1 R-IS R-2 R-3L R-3M R-3H Residential Estate (40,000-square-foot lot areas) Residential Estate (30,000-square-foot lot areas) Residential Estate (20,000-square-foot lot areas) Single Dwelling (10,000-square-foot lot areas) Single Dwelling (7,500-square-foot lot areas) Single and Double Dwellings Multiple Dwellings (4.4 - 6.3 units/acre) Multiple Dwellings (4.9 - 7.0 units/acre) Multiple Dwellings (8.4 - 12.0 units/acre) Commercial Land Uses LBC NC CO BC(M) BC Limited Business Commercial Center Neighborhood Commercial Center Commercial Office Center Business Commercial (Modified) Center Business and Commercial Center Industrial Land Uses M-1 Light Manufacturing M-2 Heavy Manufacturing Community Service Land Uses OS Open Space P Parks S School C Church W Public Water Facility CEM Cemetery FS Fire Station G Government Facility L Library CH City Hall In applying the neighborhood planning concept to the community, the City used the following guidelines: Streets: The neighborhood planning areas, where possible, are bounded by major sweets which move traffic around, instead of through the neighborhood. · Parks: Neighborhoods include parks that the City has designed to meet the needs of the particular neighborhood. Schools: School sites have been combined with the neighborhood recreation area, whenever possible, to provide a focal point for the neighborhood. · Commercial: Commercial uses are generally at the edge of residential neighborhoods or at the intersection of arterial streets. LAND USE PLAN DEFINITIONS Most of the land use plan categories coordinate with the City's zoning categories. The uses permitted in these land use categories are the same as those in the corresponding zoning district. There is a list of categories in Table 6. The City and developers may also use planned unit developments (PUDs) when proposing or reviewing developments. The proposed land use(s) in a PUD must be consistent with the Land Use Plan. The City may require a PUD in areas of significant natural features, difficult topography or transition areas between largely different zoning districts. RESIDENTIAL LAND. USES The Land Use Plan has ten residential classifications. The main difference between the single-dwelling classifications is the minimum lot sizes allowed. The difference between the three multiple-dwelling classifications is the maximum allowed density. Table 6 shows the maximum number of people per gross acre allowed. Gross acreage is the total area of the lot to be developed, including streets and drainage areas. Table 7 shows the number of people per unit that the City uses in converting the people per gross acre in Table 6 to units per gross acre in Table 8. If someone simply wants to know how many units of a certain type of dwelling they can build, they should use Table 8. TABLE 5 ESTIMATED POPULATION DENSITY BY RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION RL, Residential low densily -- 11.9 people/gross acm RM, Residential medium density = 13.3 People/gross acre RH, Residential high density = 22.8 People/gross acre TABLE 6 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT Tvoe of Dwelling Single Dwellings Double Dwellings Townhouses Manufactured Homes Apartments (3-4 units/building) Apartments ($ + umtsfouilding) Apartments (l-bedroom elderly) Apartments (2-bedroom elderly) P~ople/Uoit 3.4 2.7 2.7 a 2.5 2.7 b 1.9 ¢ 1.1 2.0 NOTES TO TABLE 6: Assumes an equal mix of 2- and 3-bedroom units (source: Fred Haas, Mary Anderson Construction). Co) Assumes an equal mix of 2- and 3-bedroom units. (c) Based on a bedroom mix of 1.9 percent efficiencies, 43.4 percent one-bedrooms, 52.1 percent two-bedrooms and 2.6 percent three-bedrooms (Source: Maplewood survey of apartment units). · 2oo~ 34 TABLE 7 PLANNED MAXIMUM DENSI~ OF DWELLING UNITS Type of Dwelling Planned Maximum Density (Units per Gross Acre) Single Dwelling~ 3.5 3.9 Double Dwellings~ 4.4 4.9 Townhomes 4.4 4.9 Manufactured Homes --- 5.3 Apartments (3-4 unit/bldg.) 4.4 4.9 Apartments (5 + unit/bldg.) 6.3 7.0 Apartments (elderly) (Based on bedroom mix. See above table.) 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 12.0 NOTES TO TABLE 7: (1) The maximum allowed density shall be determined by the minimum lot areas in the zoning code. If minimum area lots for each unit are not platted, the maximum number of units shall be determined by dividing the net project area by the minimum required lot area. Minimum lot areas may be reduced in planned unit developments, where the overall project does not exceed the maximum allowed density. The above numbers are based on the 1980 Census, except for manufactured homes. Each of the three maximum population densities from the Land Use Plan was divided by the combined people per unit for each type of dwelling reported in the census. Manufactured homes are at the 1970 Census figure to keep future manufactured home parks consistent with the character of the most recently developed parks. The City intends to review all density figures after each Federal Census and make adjustments as needed. Low density areas are usually for single dwellings. The City may allow an occasional double dwelling. Double dwellings, however, should be on high-volume streets at the periphery of single-dwelling neighborhoods. The City may also allow multiple dwellings in low-density areas with a planned unit development if: Clustering buildings would preserve significant natural features, such as woods, wetlands or steep slopes. The buildings are of a scale, design and location that is compatible with adjacent development. Medium density areas are for small-lot single dwellings, manufactured home parks and multiple dwellings. These areas usually abut single dwellings or are in neighborhoods where higher density would cause traffic or other problems for surrounding development or City facilities. High density residential is for a variety of multiple dwellings where a higher density will not adversely affect surrounding development. COMMERCIAL LAND USES There are five commercial land use classifications: Limited Business Commercial (LBC). This classification includes offices, medical clinics, and childcare facilities. This classification is intended for commercial areas adjacent to residential uses. Neighborhood Commercial Center (NC). This classification is intended for businesses that are compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods. Uses are limited to offices and smaller retail uses that cater to convenience shopping. Commercial Office (CO). The commercial office classification provides areas for offices and related uses together with supportive, low-intensity commercial uses. These areas should be close to residential areas so they can conveniently serve the public. These areas should be on heavily traveled streets or adjacent to commercial or industrial districts, to lessen their impact on residential areas. Business Commercial (Modified). The City intends this classification as a transition between more intensive commercial uses and low or medium density residential areas. Business and Commercial (BC). This commercial classification includes a wide variety of commercial uses. High-intensity uses, such as fast-food restaurants and gas stations, should be permitted subject to specific performance guidelines. INDUSTRIAL LAND USES There are two industrial land use classifications: Light Manufacturing (M-l). This classification includes warehouses, wholesale businesses, offices, cartage and express facilities, radio and television stations and other industrial uses of a lower-intensity nature. Heavy Manufacturing (M-2). This classification includes higher intensity manufacturing and industrial uses. 3M has the only M-2 land in the City now. · ~ooe 37 LAND USE ACTION PLAN Table $ lists activities that the City should undertake to implement the Land Use Plan. This table also shows the responsibility, timing, funding and coordination for each activity. TABLE 8 LAND USE ACTION PLAN Action Allow rezonings consistent with the Land Use Plan Review commercial, industrial and multi-family site plans Protect residential neighborhoods Responsibility Timing Funding PC, CC, Ongoing None Dir of CD PC, CC, CDRB Ongoing None Dir of CD PC, CC, CDRB Ongoing TIF, OF, Dir of CD CDBG Coordinate with Site Plan review; street system Land Use Plan; zoning ordimmce Land Use Plan; zoning ordinance ABBREVIATIONS: CDRB -- Community Design Review Board PC -- Planning Commi~ion CC = City Council HRA = Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority Dir of CD = Director of Community Development TIF = Tax-increment financing GF = General Fund CDBG = Commtl~lty Development Block Grant · ~oo~ 38 TABLE 9 PLANNED LAND USE ACREAGE, 1991 Low-Density Neighborhood Residential 1. Western Hills 159 (0) 2. Parkside 540 (11) 3. Kohlman Lake 335 (168) 4. Hazelwood 429 (47) 5. Maplewood Heights 224 (7) 6. Sherwood Glen 360 (5) 7. Gladstone 415 (7) 8. Hillside 309 (54) 9. Beaver Lake 354 (2) 10. Battle Creek 149 (0) I1. VistaHills 227 (62) 12. Highwood 656 (317) 13. Carver Ridge 290 (147) 4,447 (827) Medium-Density High-Density Commercial Open Residential Residential Industrial Space TOTAL 2 (0) 5 (0) 132 (42) 165 575 44 (5) 47 (21) 30 (0) 230 990 30 (11) 0 (0) 88 (60) 210 730 35 (2) 34 (15) 726 (355) 288 1,720 74 (35) 4 (0) 54 (17) 100 547 46 (21) 15 (3) 128 (222) 237 960 32 (22) 6 (0) 35 (8) 192 760 147 (136) 56 (4) 95 (55) 429 1,149 258 (62) 22 (5) 637 (42) 203 1,530 0 (0) 6 (0) 22 (0) 538 836 104 (25) 2 (0) 7 (1) 182 550 0 (0) (0) (0) 3 (0) 150 944 o (o) o (0) 0 (0) 89 463 772 (319) 218 (48) 1,957 (602) 3,013 11,754 NOTE: The figures in the left-hand column of each of the categories indicate the number of acres of land expected in that category by neighborhood at time of full development. The figures in parentheses indicate the number of acres of undeveloped land in 1991. ,~oo, 39 NN G AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUMBER NAME I WESTERN HILLS ~ ~' 3 KOHU~.N LAKE 4 ~LW~ 5 M~W~ ~ ~RW~ ~N ~.i, ~/=-~4 7 9 ~R ~E 10 BA~ CREEK 12 13 ~R R~ Neighborhood Planning Areas COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 4O Figure 9 REVISED // interchange nterchange Co. Rd. B wy. 36 or colleclor C OS -M-1 maj¢ Ilector ST. Larpenteur ~R-3(M) interchange 41 Figure 10 REVISED · . Larpenteur major arterial intel ~e >~ e- · · ,,, E I~ 0 0 '~- :Z: _ . :~ .~ ~ -B-C(M) 42 Figure 11 REVISED County Rd. D Vadnais Heights 694 prir. cil~&l arterial interchange E minor collector Little Canada oS minor Beam Ave. collector Rd. C · ;*lI major collector Gervai. '0 · ighway 36 11 43 Figure 12 interchange Vadnais Heights i I minlor arterial major collector / /. M-1 P ~principal arterial 694 · : mmmmmqmmmmmm§~ P interchange M-1 major collector ' IVI-1 :i M-1 : 'iai y 36 "~ ; , nge 44 Figure 13 REVISED interchange arterial White Bear Lake Coun{y D North St Paul 45 Figure 14 R-3t REVISED 46 Figure 15. Saint Paul REVISED II l~major I ~collect~r, ~ maj0*r arterial 47 Figure 16 North St. Paul Road ~ major collector [J ~y R-3(M) OS Larpenteur ma or arterial REVISED M-1 Mc Knight 48 Figure 17 R-3(M R-3(M) ivy Ave. R-2 R-3(H) ~land Ave. Stillwater Rd. Ave. M-1 M-1 M-2 erchange CEM BC c 0 LBC ~rchange 1-94 ~haha Ave. Ave. 49 Figure 18 REVISED ~ CO , II~ ~ ,interchange os ~ ~ os , P P ' ~ ~ ma collector ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~L' II~ 50 Figure 19 REVISED Lower Afton~ ~arterial 1 Figure 20 Linwood Highwood_--- R-11 minor R-I~ P '[I minor I co,,ector ~!, R- 1 major collector R--11 ,.~ 0 0 Carver REVISED I OS 52 Figure 21 REVISED Carver Ave. P OS major collector R-1 Newport '0 0 0 53 Figure 22 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Land Use Plan Change, Conditional Use Permit and Reduction of Parkinq Spaces 6ervais Avenue, West of White Bear Avenue The Cottages of Maplewood West (John Arkell) December 6, 1991 SUMM~a¥ INTRODUCTION Request The applicant is requesting the following: A change in the City's land use plan from LSC (limited service commercial) to RH (residential high density)· A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) for a 106-unit senior citizen housing development. The applicant is requesting the CUP because the LBC (limited commercial) zone on this site limits the uses to offices and day care. A reduction in the number of city-Code-required parking spaces. Code requires two spaces for each unit or 212 spaces. This plan shows a total of 188 parking spaces (74 attached garage spaces, 34 detached garage spaces and 80 uncovered spaces)) 27 of the uncovered parking spaces would be in front of garages. In the past, the City has not included these type of spaces towards the minimum parking space requirement. This project would, therefore, have only 161 spaces that meet Code. Description of the Project Ail the buildings are one-story town homes. The 106 units include 26 one-bedroom units, 52 two-bedroom units and 28 three- bedroom units. There would also be two units used for a community center and storm shelter. The 106 units and the community center/storm shelter would be in 9 twelve-unit buildings on 9.6 acres. There would be a concrete and grass access-way for emergency vehicles and pedestrians west of building A. The developer is also proposing to change the wetland which is on the northeast corner of the project site. The developer would fill the wetland's west end and excavate an equivalent area on the wetland's north and east end. This change will be subject to the approval of the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed Board. Board's staff has agreed to this change. The BACKGROUND The City has always zoned this site for commercial use. When the City adopted its first land use plan in 1973, however, they planned this site for RH (residential high density) use. The zoning remained the same. The City changed the land use plan for this site to commercial in 1983 to match the zoning. The following is a brief history of previous proposals for this site and City actions: Date 1977 Request Lecon Properties requested preliminary approval for' a mixed PUD, including 350 apartment units. Action Planning Commission approved. The developer dropped the project before the City Council considered it. 1982 1983 1988/89 Woodmark, Inc. requested concept approval to build apartments for senior housing. The City initiated a zone change from LBC (limited business commercial) to R-3 (multiple-family residential). This was so the zoning map would follow the land use plan. BBY Partnership applied for a land use plan change from LSC to RH (residential high density) and a CUP for a PUD to build 426 apartment units. The City Council approved the concept. (The developer dropped the project.) The Planning Commission recommended approval, but the City Council denied the change. There was strong neighborhood opposition. The Council then changed the land use plan map to LSC (limited service commercial). The City Council denied the changes after the Planning Commission recommended denial. The developer then sued the City, but the Courts upheld the City Council's decision. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL There are no specific criteria for a land use plan change. Any land use plan change should be consistent with the goals and policies in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2 The resolution on page 22 gives the ten findings required by Code for approval of a conditional use permit. DISCUSSION Land Use Ch&nqes This is a good site for senior housing. It is on a major collector street (Gervais Avenue) and close to a major arterial street (White Bear Avenue), church, park and shopping. The senior project would be a transitional use between s~ngle dwellings and commercial uses. This project should be a good neighbor to the adjacent homes. Seniors are quiet neighbors and the buildings are a distinctive one-story style that would be compatible with the design of surrounding homes. Sidewalk The developer should build a 5-foot-wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Gervais Avenue from White Bear Avenue to Four Seasons Park. This sidewalk would provide a safe way for the seniors to walk to the shopping center to the east and Four Seasons Park to the west. The developer is asking the City to pay for this sidewalk with tax-increment financing. Refer to the separate report on financing for this project that covers this in more detail. Reduced P&rkinq Spaces, The proposed number of parking spaces should be adequate for a senior housing development. The ratio of spaces to units is the same for the Village on Woodlynn senior project (the former Cottages of Maplewood). Multiple dwellings limited to seniors have fewer cars per unit than multiple dwellings that are not restricted to seniors. The City has recognized this by approving other senior housing projects with a reduced number of parking spaces. (See page 10.) Buildinq Setbacks City Code requires at least 20 feet between buildings in town- house developments. This proposal has all the living units at least 20 feet apart, but has some of the detached garages between 6 and 19 feet apart. Staff is recommending a Code change that would reduce the setback between dwellings and garages and between garages and garages to ten feet. The setback between dwelling units would stay at twenty feet. The Design Review Board will be considering this change in a separate report. 3 Perimeter Drive Some of the residents on Flandrau Street are complaining about the closeness of the perimeter drive to their rear lot lines. The City fire marshal required this drive for fire protection. It is similar to the one required for the Village on Woodlynn project. The developer would have to buy more land and move the whole project to the east to increase the setback from the west lot line. The current setback meets City Code. .Sanitary Sewer The existing sanitary sewer that serves the property is not adequate for the proposal. The City Engineer feels that the City will need to construct a public improvement project before the ~eveloper could build this proposal. The City needs the public improvement project to replace the inadequate sanitary sewer line that serves this and other properties in the area. Land North of the Senior Sitt The land use plan shows an open space connection between the wetlands to the east and Four Seasons Park. The intent was probably for a trail connection between the two. Part of this land is now platted with the Seasons Park Addition. When the City considered this plat, they decided to provide a trail connection between Flandrau Street and Four Seasons Park, rather than to the wetlands to the northeast. There is, therefore, no longer a reason to show an open space connection to the northeasterly wetlands. The Council considered the land to the north of the Cottages on November 14. They tabled several alternatives for platting this land with single dwellings until March 9 to give the property owner time to study the alternatives. The property owner is also considering the possibility of an office use. The developer should design the excavation of the pond to allow room for a drive. This drive would provide access from the south to the land north of the Cottages site. If this drive cannot be built, the City should change the zoning on the land north of the Cottages to R-1 (single dwellings). The City should not allow commercial traffic on Bittersweet Lane. RECOMMENDATIONS Approve the attached resolution on page 20. It changes the land use plan from LSC (limited service commercial) to RI{ (residential high density), based on the following findings~ a. This site is proper for and consistent with the City,s policies for high density residential use. This includes: 4 (1) Being a transitional land use between low density residential and commercial land uses. (2) It is next to a collector street and is near a church, shopping and Four Seasons Park. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: (l) The existing and proposed vegetation will screen the town houses from the nearby homes. (~) Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values. (3) There would be no traffic from this development on existing residential streets. The City had planned this site for RH land use from 1973 - 1983. dm In 1983, the City gave concept approval to a senior housing project on this site. approve 161 parking spaces (108 garages and 53 open spaces), rather than the 212 spaces required by code, because: am The parking space requirement is not proper for senior housing, because there are fewer cars per unit in these projects. The city has approved a reduced number of parking spaces for other senior hoUsing, including the Village on Woodlynn. &pprove the attached resolution on page 22. It approves a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for this project, based on the ten findings required by Code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.) Approval is subject to the following conditions: All construction shall follow the site plan date- stamped November 20, 1991, except that all buildings, including garages shell be at least ten feet apart. The City Council may approve major changes, after a public hearing and recommendation from the Community Design Review Board. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The owner shall not convert this development to non- seniors housing without the revision of the planned unit development. For this permit, the City defines 5 de ge he seniors housing as a residence occupied by persons that are 60 years of age or older. The developer shall install a S-foot-wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Gervais Avenue. This sidewalk shall run from White Bear Avenue to Four Seasons Park. The plans and specifications for the sidewalk shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Approval by the City Engineer of final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and driveway plans. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. The design of the pond shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The design shall allow for a future 24-foot-wide drive between the pond and the wetlands to the northeast. The developer shall be responsible for getting all off-site pond and drainage easements. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day-to-day transportation on site. If the City determines there are excess parking spaces available on site, then the City may allow the parking of these on site. If the City Council determines there is not enough on- site parking after 95 percent occupancy, the City may require additional parking. The property manager shall keep the emergency access drive plowed of snow so emergency vehicles can pass over the drive. The developer shall provide an on-site storm shelter in a central location in the development. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Emergency Preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. The City Council ordering the construction of a new sanitary sewer to serve this property. 0 The city Council shall review this permit one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in City Code. approve the resolution on page 25. It orders a feasibility study for the reconstruction of the sanitary sewer line that would serve this project. It also allows the City Engineer to spend up to $20,000 from the sewer fund to pay for this study. 7 CITIZEN COMMENTR Staff surveyed the 23 property owners within 350 feet of the site about the proposal. There were 12 responses. 4 were for the project, 7 were against and 1 had no comment. For The need for senior housing. This is a good location because of bus service and shopping close by that will meet the needs of seniors. (Zappa - 2522 Flandrau Street) It represents a housing need, will be quiet, low traffic, low structures, not disruptive to the neighborhood. (Oswald - 1694 Demont Avenue) We are highly in favor of this proposal because the increased population density is a plus to us. We believe that the whole area should be zoned residential. (Victory in Christ Lutheran Church - 1695 Gervais Avenue) It's a perfect location for something like this. (Peterson - 2432 Flandrau Street) The proposed street at the back of my home is too close to the end of my lot. I suggest a minimum of 40 feet away from the end of my lot for any street. (Outar - 2456 Flandrau) It is not common for a street to run directly behind private yards, property valuation will plummet and eyesore. It would be better to put land behind land and then the street. Backyard to backyard. (Schulte - 2473 Flandrau) Site design, construction design. The site is deserving of a better project and product. It should have attached garages, higher density buildings with more open space. Better screening or transition to single family areas to south, north and west. (Gardner Brothers Construction) This is to be for LBC use. Concerns of ours include traffic, especially at hours when we leave and come in. Keep the area for use intended in the Comprehensive Plan. (Schwan's Sales) I object to this proposal if the development of this site affects the future development or expansion of our business. (Personal Touch Auto Body - 1790 Gervais Court) See the letters on pages 17 and 18. 8 REFERENCE Site Description The site is undeveloped with a large wetland to the northeast of the property. There are steep slopes to the north of the site going up to Bittersweet Lane and Demont Avenue. Surroundino Land Uses North: Undeveloped property that the City has planned and zoned for limited commercial uses. On March 9, the Council will also consider plans for developing this property with single-dwelling homes. East: Undeveloped property which is part of the Wessin property that the City has planned and zoned for limited commercial uses. Further to the east is the Mapleridge Shopping Center with Rainbow Foods as its anchor store and White Bear Avenue. South: Across Gervais Avenue are light industrial land uses such as Personal Touch Auto Body and Schwan's Foods warehouse. To the southwest of the site are two homes. West: The Seasons Park Addition with single-family home sites along Flandrau Street that the City has zoned R-1. Further to the west is a Lutheran church and Four Seasons Park. Reasons for the Request This proposal needs a land use plan change because: State law does not allow a city to adopt any regulation which conflicts with its comprehensive plan. One of the findings required by Code for a CUP is that the use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The land use plan shows this site for LSC uses, which do not include multiple-family housing. The developer is applying for a CUP because the zoning on this site is LBC (limited business commercial). The LBC zone only allows offices and day-care centers. The developer chose to apply for a CUP, rather than a zone change. The City may approve any development with more than five acres and more than one use or building with a CUP in any zoning district. A CUP for a PUD is only for a specific use and site plan. A rezoning to R-3 (multiple-dwelling residential) would allow a variety of multiple- dwelling uses and plans. 9 Past &ctions - Site The City changed the zoning on this site from SC (shopping center) to LBC (limited business commercial) in 1969. The LBC zone at that time allowed apartments. In 1973, the City adopted its first Comprehensive Plan which planned this site RH (residential high density). In August 1977, LeCon Properties made a request for approval of a mixed use PUD which included 350 multiple-family housing units. The Planning Commission approved the preliminary concept plan but the City Council never considered the project. In September 1982, the City Council gave concept approval to Woodmark, Inc. to build apartments for senior housing. The developer later dropped this project. In April 1983, the City initiated a zone change for the whole undeveloped 31-acre site along the north side of Gervais Avenue. This change was from LBC (limited business commercial) to R-3 (multiple-family residential). This change was to make the zoning map follow the land use plan. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the R-3 zoning for the whole site. When the City Council considered the R-3 zoning, several area residents expressed concern about the R-3 zoning. In response to the residents' concerns, the Council denied the zone change and approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment from RH (residential high density) to LSC (limited service commercial). In 1988, BBY Partnership applied to the City for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (LSC to RH) and conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD). This was for a 426ounit apartment development on a 31-acre site along the north side of Gervais Avenue. The City Council denied the requests after the Planning Commission recommended denial. The developer sued the City, but the Courts upheld the City's denial. Past Actions - Parking and Garaqe- The City has approved reduced parking and garage requirements for all past senior housing. This includes the following: 2. 3. 4. Concordia Arms: 100 spaces for 124 units or .8 space per unit. Hazel Ridge: 75 spaces for 75 units or 1 space per unit. Casey Lake (Harmony School site - never built): 62 spaces for 62 units or i space per unit. Village on Woodlynn (former Cottages of Maplewood): 87 spaces for 60 units or 1 space for each 1.5 units. The Cottages project would have one space for each 1.5 units. 10 Pl&nninq Considerations Existing Land Use Plan Designation - LSC commercial). Proposed Land Use Plan Designation - RI{ density). (limited service (residential high Permitted Density - 22.8 people per acre. Proposed Density - 22.5 people per acre. Land Use Policies The proposed development follows the Comprehensive Plan's policies. This includes: "The City shall encourage transitional land use with medium and higher density residential development located between low-density residential and commercial or service land uses." 2. In section 74-5, Comprehensive Plan policy should. . . "Accomplish transition between distinctly different types of residential land uses in an orderly fashion to avoid creating a negative (economic, social or physical) impact on adjoining developments." 3. In Section 74-12, "High-density residential areas should be located adjacent to or in close proximity to collectors and arterials." The proposed development also follows the residential development design objectives in the Comprehensive Plan. "Pedestrian ways should be planned and developed to connect homes with schools and open space." Staff is recommending that the City require that the developer install a 5-foot-wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Gervais Avenue. This should run from White Bear Avenue to Four Seasons Park (about 2500 feet). Housing Policies In 1982, Gary Solomonson Associates rated seven sites in Maplewood for senior housing, including this one. The City undertook this study as part of a city-sponsored effort to promote the development of owner-occupied senior housing. 11 A finding of the 1982 study was that area seniors would prefer a variety of housing styles and types in addition to apartment buildings. This might include owner-occupied and rental townhouses, home sharing and senior group homes. The HRA adopted a goal to promote a wider variety of senior housing opportunities within the City. This proposal is consistent with that policy. kr/Cotwest.mem Attachments 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. (11-29) Location Map Existing Land Use Plan Map Property Line/Zoning Map Site Plan Letter: Duong Letter: Wilde Land Use Plan Amendment Resolution: Cottages Resolution: CUP for PUD Resolution: Feasibility Study 12 P~/VD ~o CO RD VIKIN~ Knuckle Heod L ~ke i,~ I ~ ~V . f~Igss4~/,4v, l :~. :1 NORTH RIE RD 1 3 Attachment 1 svv. -;/ nll/0r ~:, ¢l/,..,.,/. DO ' · · r'~ · · · e.~f . / %0 ii P OS LSC ' 4 PlH' C HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 1 4 Attachment 2 f .J ! 1' Il :, I I .I N'TYm.--R , _l~e~.~v~ ...;.- .-.,.' ._~ ~ ' mr . - :---' ,,.[---' : ~ ,, IL.. . - . ~ - (,.) , ' ,' ~ ~,'~ !I:--'-; ~ .,.r,--~- ~ .~ . .: ..,.,,-. ,, .... I,;, I,..,1:-~ ':'" ~. 2.~0 2~,~.,~ -.. (. -,.,--- ';~--- - i ' 1'-LTT~?~ ~ '":~ ',,-~ 'I · (,,, ,~ ,I I I -: 24'80::'~.: . %*' ,J ~~'~. ;_. .... .. ;...::: ...... ,~ ,,. 2 3, L:L ~ 2~_ '~'2~.::::::: I ,. , \ ~,,,.J ,~_: '" ;L~.!~~:,,::~:,:-~~;il::~ I ,,- ,,"--':'-. ~-"'"'. ...... ? (' ~) ,~ ~ ~' ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ,......~,__=~._"....:==-.~.....-... .,.,~..= '"' ! ....... ' -=~1 ¢i~'.'""~-' ~- ' : .... ' =1 j '/ ~'/ M1 I .,* / · l~ eyeah'nmI l Att'achment'3 Jt "J DRIVEWAY 2t GREEN AREA WETLAND DETACHED GARAGES G~-RVAIS AVENUE SITE PLAN 16 Attachment 4 N Geoff Olson, AICP ' ~ Director of Community Development City of Maplewood Maplewood, MN 55109 November 7, 1991 Dear Mr. Olson, Thank you for your survey concerning the proposed senior housing development on the north side of Gervais Avenue, west of the Maple Ridge Shopping Center. I object to the proposed development because of the following reasons: 1. The area is a beautiful and unique natural park in Maplewood. 2. The layout site would put a street 12 feet from my backyard. Presently, there aren't many natural parks within Maplewood City and within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Areas. It is quite unique and is quite a blessing to have such a beautiful site right behind our backyards and right in the heart of our city. I have seen many geese fly around the area and many rodents' footprints . Also, I have seen a variety of different kinds of wild flowers, wild plumbs,wild berries, and the rare Virgin Grass. It is really pitiful to destroy all natural beauty and the home of hundreds of wild animals and flowers. We, today, are more conscious of protecting and preserving nature and the environment. By rejecting the development plan, we would have accomplished a very important and basic first step. Furthermore, the proposed plan would make the backyards of many houses on Flandrau Street unsafe. Many residents on Flandrau Street include small children and they are subjected to automobile accidents within a few steps from their backyards. I have given you the reasons for my objection and concern of the development plan. I sincerely hope that you will consider my points of view. If this development can not be stopped, please consider allowing at least forty feet of grass and bushes between the edge of our backyards and the street for safety reason. Again, I thank you for considering my opinion and for your time. Sincerely, Nga Duong 777-6638 (home) 639-2857 (work) 17 Attachment 5 Geoff Olson, AICP Director of Community Development City of Maplewood Haplewood MN, 55109 Mr. Olson, Thank you for your letter/questionaire concerning the proposed senior housing development behind Mapleridge Shopping Mall. I object to the proposed development as out--lined because: 1) It is an incomplete picture of the development of that area. 2) The area is ecologically unique in Maplewood. 3) There would be an adverse impact on the wetlands in that immediate area, and on the larger wetlands north of the development site and the one east of White Bear Ave. 4) The proposed layout of the site would adversely affect the quality of the adjacent home sites. In more detail... 1) The picture is incomplete. In the meeting sponsored by th~ ,fevelopers they discussed a proposed extension of Bittersweet Lane, extending it south and west of its present cul-de-sac. Such an extension would directly abut the proposed Cottages development and the two should be considered at the same time to get an over- all picture of what the area will be like. 2) The area is home (in addition to common wildlife such as muskrat, mink, and deer) to possibly the last badger habitat in the metro area. His tracks have been photographed and digs examined by the DNR. Although the badger is not a protected species in Minnesota, such an unusual inhabitant should be given some consideration. The badger is a plains animal. He hunts the high grass territory in that vi...inity, not the wetlands. Because of their voracious appetite for mice, mole, salamanders, etc., they are an important part of the environmental balance of that area. 3) The impact on the greater wetlands of the area would be tremendous. The developer proposes "moving the existing pond over a few feet" He said that the pond area is "dry" It was in Sept. but not during the summer. Even when dried down in the'fall a plant biologist could tell you that the grasses in the lowlands are those that grow only in full water. In addition, the wetlands to the immediate north, and those east of White Bear Ave. are probably part of the same overall flowage. The pond he intends to move and the larger marsh near Rainbow Foods would both be changed radically. If the development site drains directly into them they will become flooded (since houses and concrete don't absorb rainwater) or dried out because the storm sewer diverts the rain into another area. Attachment 6 4) Aside from the damage to the ecoic?y, I object to the development as proposed. They pian a street around the perimeter of their area. This worked well in the North St. Paui site because aIi adjoining property is commercial. In this instance it would put traffic within 12 feet of the residential properties on Flandrau. (according to the detail presented at the developers meeting). This is just not acceptable. Many of the homes on Flandrau have small children. I personally have a two year old grandchild. A street, even a low traffic, reduced speed zone street only a co~le steps from my back yard would be a hazard. Certainly if you were asked to approve a residential development that proposed streets on both sides of residences you would ~3ay the developer should go back to the drawing boards. You're second question was "What could the developer do to make his plan acceptable?" If the unique environment cannot be preserved, forty feet of protection between my back yard and any traffic should be a minimum. This could be either a forty foot grass/bush buffer or a reasonable backyard for the adjacent home. The proposed map shows a nice tree area between the individual buildings. I would think a good architect could lay the same number of units out so that the backyard area for the units would be on the perimeter of the site and the streets in the center at their front yards as with any normal house siting. Art Wilde 2464 Flandrau Maplewood MN, 55109 736-4076 (work) 773-0463 (home) 19 LAND USE PLAN CHAN~E RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Cottages Lifestyles Inc. (John Arkell) applied for a change to the City's land use plan from LSC (limited service commercial) to RH (residential high density). WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property on the north side of Gervais Avenue, east of Flandrau Street. The legal description is: The north 689.64 feet of the south 989.64 feet of Lot 2, the north 284.67 feet of the south 989.64 feet of the west 15.0 feet of Lot 1, and the south 704.97 feet of Lot 1, all in E. G. Rogers Garden lots, Ramsey County, subject to Gervais Avenue road easement. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 2, 1991. City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the plan amendment be The City Council discussed the plan amendment on December 23, 1991. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-described change for the following reasons: This site is proper for and consistent with the City's policies for high density residential use. This includes: Being a transitional land use between low density residential and commercial land uses. be It is next to a collector street and is near a church, shopping and Four Seasons Park. This development will minimize adverse effect on surrounding properties because: The existing and proposed vegetation will screen the town houses from the nearby homes. bo Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values. 20 Attachment 7 There would be no traffic from this development on existing residential streets. The City had planned this site for RH land use from 1973 - 1983. In 1983, the City gave concept approval to a senior housing project on this site. Adopted on December 23, 1991. res\Cottlup jl COND'rT~'ON~,L USE PERI~'rT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Cottages Lifestyles Inc. (John Arkell) applied for a conditional use permit for the Cottages of Maplewood West planned unit development. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the undeveloped property on the north side of Gervais Avenue, east of Flandrau Street. The legal description is: The north 689.64 feet of the south 989.64 feet of Lot 2, the north 284.67 feet of the south 989.64 feet of the west 15.0 feet of Lot l, and the south 704.97 feet of Lot 1, all in E. G. Rogers Garden lots, Ramsey County, subject to Gervais Avenue road easement. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: The Planning Commission discussed this application on December 2, 1991. They recommended that the City Council deny the permit. The City Council held a public hearing on December 23, 1991. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-described conditional use permit for the following reasons: The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 22 Attachment 8 0 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. e The use would be served by adequate public.facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. e The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. The use Would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 0 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: Ail construction shall follow the site plan date- stamped November 20, 1991, except that all buildings, including garages shall be at least ten feet apart. The City Council may approve major changes, after a public hearing and recommendation from the Community Design Review Board. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The owner shall not convert this development to nonseniors housing without the revision of the planned unit development. For this permit, the City defines seniors housing as a residence occupied by persons that are 60 years of age or older. The developer shall install a 5-foot-wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of.Gervais Avenue. This sidewalk shall run from White Bear Avenue to Four Seasons Park. The plans and specifications for the sidewalk shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Approval by the City Engineer of final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and driveway plans. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. ® The design of the pond shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The design shall allow for a future 24-foot-wide drive between the pond and the wetlands to the northeast. The developer shall be 23 ® e 10. 12. responsible for getting all off-site ponding and drainage easements. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day-to-day transportation on site. If the City determines there are excess parking spaces available on site, then the City may allow the parking of these on site. If the City Council determines there is not enough on- site parking after 95 percent occupancy, the City may require additional parking. The property manager shall keep the emergency access drive plowed of snow so emergency vehicles can pass over the drive. The developer shall provide an on-site storm shelter in a central location in the development. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Emergency Preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. The City Council ordering the construction of a new sanitary sewer to serve this property. The City Council shall review this permit one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in City Code. Adopted December 23, 1991. res\Cottcup jl 24 - RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed to replace the trunk sanitary sewer from VanDyke at Kohlman to Kennard at Beam and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MI N N ESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Furthermore, funds in the amount of $20,000 from the sanitary sewer fund are appropriated to prepare this feasibility report. 25 Attachment 9 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: City Manager Director of Community Development Tax-Exempt and Tax-Increment Financing Gervais Avenue, West of White Bear Avenue The Cottages of Maplewood West (John Arkell) December 6, 1991 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting Council approval for $5.2 million in tax-exempt housing revenue bond financing and $93,644 each year for 15 years in tax-increment financing (TIF). This request is for the cottages of Maplewood West on Gervais Avenue, west of White Bear Avenue. This financing would require that the developer keep the rents of this project affordable to low and moderate income seniors for at least the 35-year life of the bonds. BACKGROUND Tax-exempt financing reduces the interest rate for the developer's financing. There is no loss of City money. This is money that normally would have gone to the Federal treasury. The City has approved tax-exempt financing for three previous senior housing projects - Hazel Ridge, the Harmony School site (never built) and the Village on Woodlynn senior project (formerly the Cottages of Maplewood). Tax-increment financing uses the increase in taxes from a new development to finance projects with a public purpose. These taxes would normally go to the city, county, school district and other agencies that property taxes fund. The chart on page 10 shows the agencies that would lose taxes and how much. A justification for tax-increment financing is that the developer would not build the project (which will generate property taxes) without this financing. So these agencies may not have received this money anyway. The City has approved tax-increment financing for two senior housing projects and a first-time home buyers program in 1982. The City also approved tax-increment financing in 1988 for the Village on Woodlynn. The City received a CDBG of $252,500 in 1988 for the Village on Woodlynn project. The developer used this money towards the purchase of the land for the project. DISCUSSION Tax-increment Financing This project should generate $93,644 each year in increased property taxes or tax increments. The developer is requesting that the City pay this amount to the developer for 15 years to repay him for project costs. This would allow the developer to keep the rents lower than market rate rents. The City approved this same financing for the Village on Woodlynn senior project. Mr. Arkell's letter on page 14 states that rent restrictions would continue for at least 35 years. The public subsidy of this project would be less per unit than the Village on Woodlynn. The City provided $8,792 per unit in tax-increment and CDBG money to the Village on Woodlynn. The City would only be giving $5,522 per unit in tax-increment financing to the Cottages of Maplewood West. The proposed rents of the Cottages would also be less than the rents at the Village on Woodlynn. The developer would get the first 15 years of tax-increment from this project. Staff is planning a second hearing at the January 27 Council meeting to consider using the following ten years of tax increment from this project to pay for the sanitary sewer needed for this project. The City intends to apply for a Federal Community Development Block Grant for this project. If approved, the City could use this grant to reduce the tax-increment money for this project or the sanitary sewer. Need for Senior Housing The developer should provide a market study to determine the long-term demand for these units. The current demand looks good for the Maplewood area. The waiting lists for the Village on Woodlynn and the Cottages of North St. Paul are more than 300 people. This project will add another 106 units. A 92-unit project is planned in Little Canada. This project would be a three-story apartment with similar rents to the Cottages of Maplewood West. The Cottages of Stillwater project could not get enough seniors to fill their units. So they have opened them up to non-seniors. They now have only 40% of their units occupied with seniors. The Department of Housing and Urban Development has had restrictions on new senior housing for several years, because of over building of senior housing in the metro area. As the baby boom generation ages, there should be a growing need for senior housing. The cutback in federal housing programs compounds this problem. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS Adopt the resolution on page 9. It approves tax-exempt mortgage revenue financing for $5.2 million to construct The Cottages of Maplewood West project. Approval is subject to the City's requirements for tax-exempt mortgage revenue financing and the following income and rent requirements: ae At least 20% of the units shall have households with an adjusted gross income of 50% or less of the metropolitan median income or at least 40% of the units shall have households with an adjusted gross income of 60% of the median income. At least 75% of the units shall have households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than 110 percent of the metropolitan median income. At least 51% of the units shall be affordable to households which have adjusted gross incomes of no more than 80% of the metropolitan median income. Adopt the attached resolution on page 15. It gives the developer the increased tax revenue (tax increment) from this project for 15 years. Approval is subject to receiving a percentage of the sale of the property in proportion to the City,s investment of tax-increment funds over an annual appreciation of five percent· The City may change the amount of tax-increment financing after the following are done: The developer and City determine the total cost of the development· The developer shall provide a market study to the City documenting that there will be enough demand from seniors over 59 years old for these units over the life of the bonds. The County decides whether to approve a Community Development Block Grant for this development. 3 REFERENCE Past Actions on other Senior Housinq Financin~ 1982: Council gave concept approval to using tax-increment financing to help with the development of a seniors housing project. The project would have used about $150,000 of tax-increment funds for each of two senior housing developments (Hazel Ridge and Bennington Woods). The developers proposed that the developments be owner-occupied. The program also included a part for first-time home buyers financed with tax-exempt financing. Interest rates fell and the developer abandoned the program. 1-14-85: The Council gave preliminary approval for $5.8 million of tax-exempt financing for up to 100 units for the Hazel Ridge Seniors Residence at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. 11-25-85: The Council gave preliminary approval for $6.5 million of tax-exempt financing for the ll6-unit Harmony School (Casey Lake) Seniors Residence (County Road C and White Bear Avenue). This was subject to construction beginning within one year. (This project was never built.) 1987-88: The Council approved $2,448,100 of tax-exempt housing revenue bonds for the 60-unit Cottages of Maplewood (Village on Woodlynn) project. The Council also approved $275,000 of tax-increment financing. Comparison of Waiting Lists and Rents The waiting lists and rents for the existing senior residences in the area are: Market rate units-Rent (includes utilities) Archer Heights - 100 $370 (1 bedroom) (1) (2) (3) (4) Concordia Arms - 200+ $535 (1 bedroom) Franklyn Park - 125+ $560 (1 bedroom) Village on - 100+ $500 Woodlynn $650 (1 bedroom) (2 bedroom) (5) Cottages of - 200 $450 (1 bedroom) North St. Paul $530 (2 bedroom) 4 The applicant is proposing the following 1992 rents for the Cottages of Maplewood West: $385 plus $40 for utilities = $425 per month for a one- bedroom unit; $485 plus $50 for utilities = $535 per month for a two- bedroom unit; and $495 per month for a three-bedroom unit plus $60 for utilities = $555 per month for a three-bedroom unit. Required Income and Rent Limitations ae Federal law requires the City to enforce one of two income limitations for the life of the bond to qualify for tax- exempt housing revenue bond financing: (1) Households with adjusted gross incomes of 50 percent or less of the metropolitan median income must occupy at least 20 percent of the units, or; (2) Households with adjusted gross incomes of 60 percent or less of the metropolitan median income must occupy at least 40 percent of the units. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME FOR 1991 Percent of Median Income One Adult Two Adults 50% $16,800 $19,200 60% $20,160 $23,040 bo Ramsey County requires that 51 percent of the units must be affordable (not more than 30 percent of gross income) to households with adjusted gross incomes of 20 percent or less of the metropolitan median income. For one-person households in 1991, the 80 percent annual income ceiling is $26,600. For two-person households, the 80 percent annual income ceiling is $30,400. Ce The city's financing policies for tax-exempt financing require that at least 75% of the units shall have households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than 110 percent of the metropolitan median income. Competitiveness with Existinq Senior Residences The design of this development will attract persons usually younger and more independent (transportation and socially) than the Archer Heights and Concordia Arms residences. Archer Heights and Concordia Arms require their residents to be 62 or older. 5 The City required a minimum age of 60 for the Village on Woodlynn project. Staff is recommending the same requirement for the Cottages of Maplewood West. Archer Heights and Concordia Arms also have meeting areas which this proposal will not have. This project also should not compete directly with the Hazel Ridge units. Hazel Ridge's rents range from $700 to $900 for one bedroom and $980 to $1300 for two-bedroom units. These rents include wellness programs that will not be available at the proposed development. This project would directly compete with the Cottages of North St. Paul and the Village on Woodlynn. Suitability of the Site for a Seniors Residence Gary Solomonson Associates did a site evaluation for the City in 1982 of potential senior housing sites. The study considered seven cities, including this site. This study found this site well suited for senior housing. Captured Tax Increment Not Availabl~ Unit of Government City of Maplewood Ramsey County I.S.D. #622 Metro Tech. #916 Metro Watershed County Library Fish Creek Watershed Others TOTAL Tax Impact (Current Rate and Values) $14,911 $27,222 $43,538 $1,283 $123 $2,081 $969 $3,517 $93,644 kr/Cottages.mem (11-29) Attachments 1. Location Map 2. 11-12-91 letter from John Arkell 3. Resolution: Tax-exempt financing 4. Resolution: Tax-increment financing COPE x M&I~.E VIEW , NORTH RD IOIII G~ z VIKIN~ ~' Knuck/e Heo# L oke RIE RD ~V 7 Attachment 1 November i2, 1991 City of Maplewood Mr. Geoff Olson, City Planner Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Geoff: I have beer,, asked by Mary Ipple to detai~ ou.r ten--~ income limits to 'you in letter form. Our tax credits will restrict the Cottages of Maplewood West for a 15 year period of time. These income restri'ctions are issued yearly by - · ~ ...... '~20 150 for H U.D. For the 'year I~1 the income le~e~=, are , ~- ....... ~ o5(') for a two person a one person P~~ld and $~.~,_ . househol d. Although the tax credit guide lines expire in 15 'years the bond requirements will continue for ar, additional 20 years i~ vr i -~- ,-~,, . ..ife~.. The bono=, requir~ that 40'z... of the tenants must not earn more than 60% of .... ~,:w area median These two programs should o~fer the city some assurances that the low to moderate income housing need will be complied with over the next .....~,~ years. Sincerel y, John W. Arkell (612) 490-0263 .... "' .... IE~ · -',,~8,~ North Lexington Ave North; ~u~te .. ', Arden Hills~ Minnesota 55126 8 Attachment 2 RESOLUTION RECITIN~ A PROPOS~L FOR ~ FINANCIN~ PRO~RAM FOR ~ MULTIFAMILY RENT&L HOUSIN~ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT~ GIVIN~ PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT /~ND THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSIN~ REVENUE BONDS~ PURSU~NT TO MINNESOTA ST~TUTES~ CHAPTER 462C, ~ND~PPROVIN~ ~ HOUSIN~ PL~NAND PRO~RAM (THE COTTagES OF MAPLEWOOD WEST PROJECT) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act") confers upon cities, the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one or more multifamily housing developments within the boundaries of the City; be The City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City") has received from The Cottages of Maplewood West Limited Partnership (the "Developer") a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations (in one or more series) (the "Bonds") pursuant to the Act; Ce The City desires to facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the development of housing facilities designed for occupancy by elderly persons; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; de The Developer is currently engaged in the business of real estate development. The Project to be financed by the Bonds is the acquisition, construction and equipping of an approximately 97,500 square foot multifamily rental housing development of approximately 106 rental units all designed for elderly housing located in the vicinity of Gervais Avenue, west of White Bear Avenue in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and consists of the construction and equipping of buildings thereon which will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to persons within the community; ee The City has been advised by representatives of the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowing cots, the Project is economically more feasible; fe A public hearing on the Project was held on December 23, 1991, after notice was published and materials made available for public inspection at the City Hall, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.154, Subdivision 4, of the Act, at which public hearing all those appearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted; and No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: The Council hereby finds that no information presented at the hearing has caused it to reject the Project. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the acquisition and construction of multifamily rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement between the City and the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in the total principal amount of approximately $5,200,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition and construction of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Developer therein to be mortgaged to the purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder(s) of the Bonds; and the City, acting by and through the City, hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. At the option of the City, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be consented to by the Developer. On the basis of information available to the City it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multifamily housing development within the meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act; that the availability of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a l0 Be e substantial inducement to the Developer to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional multifamily senior rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, and to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City. The Project and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue bonds, is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ("MHFA") and subject to final approval by the city, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the project. The housing program for financing the project prepared in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.03 is hereby approved. The City Clerk is authorized to submit the application to MHFA for its approval. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the city in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by the Developer. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the City Attorney, DeveloPer and purchasers of the Bonds (or trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City, except such property as may be expressly pledged for the security of the Bonds. The Bonds shall recite in substance that Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bonds shall not 10. 11. 12. constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. In anticipation of the approval by MHFA and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, short-term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. The actions of City Staff in causing the notice of public hearing to be published in the Maplewood Review are hereby ratified, confirmed and adopted. The Developer shall enter into various agreements with the City which shall impose the following restrictions on the Developer and the Project: ae Construction must begin by December 23, 1992. The City Council may grant a time extension if just cause is shown; be Contracts entered into with contractors doing work on the Project shall provide that: (1) The contractor shall not discriminate in the hiring or firing of employees on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability or age. (2) The contractor shall compensate employees with wages and financial remuneration as provided under the United States Code, Section 276A, as amended through June 23, 1986, and under Minnesota Statutes 1985, Sections 177.41-177.44. (3) The contractor shall be required to employ Minnesota residents in at least 80% of the jobs created by the project; and, at least 60% of the group shall be residents of the seven-county metropolitan area. Resident status under both of the above categories shall be determined as of the date of this resolution. However, if the contractor can show that these quotas are not feasible because of a shortage of qualified personnel in specific skills, the contractor may request the City Council for a release from the two residency requirements. The requirements de ee shall continue for the duration of the construction project. (4) The contractor shall be an active participant in a State of Minnesota apprentice program, approved by the Department of Labor and Industry. (5) All provision of these tax-exempt finance requirements shall apply to all subcontractors working on the Project. A written opinion, with supporting justification from a qualified expert acceptable to the City, shall be submitted with the application requesting tax exempt mortgage financing to document that: (1) The Project will not adversely increase the vacancy rates of rental multiple dwellings in the city that are existing or have received preliminary City approval over the metropolitan average. (2) There is reasonable assurance that the Project will be able to comply with the federal, county and City low-to-moderate income requirements over the life of the bond issue. The bond indenture for the Bonds shall require: (~) The Developer to periodically certify to the city and trustee, compliance with the federal low-to- moderate income requirement. The frequency of certification shall be determined on a case-by- case basis. (2) The trustee is to inform the city of noncompliance trends with federal low-to-moderate income requirements. As a condition of approving the Project, a lump-sum fee at Bond closing or an annual fee over the life of the Bond will be required. The City reserved the right to choose the fee option that will be the most beneficial to the City. This choice will be made when the final resolution for the Project and the Bonds is adopted. Factors to be taken into account will include, but not be limited to: (1) The size of the Bond issue. (2) Unbudgeted City funding needs at the time of the request. (3) The number of requests. ]3 (4) Federal arbitrage considerations. f. The formula for each fee option is as follows: (1) Annual fee: (a) Full bond maturity: An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the Bond issue of not less than one-eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one-quarter of one percent of the Bond issue shall be paid at Bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. (2) (b) Prepayment of Bonds: The same as the full Bond maturity requirement, except if all of the outstanding Bonds are prepaid prior to final Bond maturity, the developer shall pay, at the time of such prepayment, a lump-sum fee equal to the present value of the remaining annual fee payments, from the date of prepayment to final Bond maturity, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. Lump-sum fee: At Bond closing, a lump-sum fee shall be paid that is equivalent to the present value of the annual fee option. The present value must be determined by a qualified expert, acceptable to the City. ge At least 20% of the units shall have households with an adjusted gross income of 50% or less of the metropolitan median income or at least 40% of the units shall have households with an adjusted gross income of 60% of the median income. At least 75% of the units shall have households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than 110 percent of the metropolitan median income. At least 51% of the units shall be affordable to households which have adjusted gross incomes of no more than 80% of the metropolitan median income. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this 23rd day of December, 1991. jl res\Cottwest.bon EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF F~APLEWOOD, MINNESOTA HELD: December 23, 1991 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly held on the 23rd day of December, 1991, at 7:10 p.m. The following member~ of the Council were prescnt: and the following were absent: Member resolution and moved its adoption: introduced the following RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MODIFICATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, AND ESTABLISHING HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1-4 AND THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO; AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF THE MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF THE MODIFIED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1-4 WITHIN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS: A. The City of Maplewood (the "City") has heretofore created Development District No. 1 and it has been proposed that the City modify the development program with respect thereto, and establish Housing District No. 1-4 within Development District No. 1 and adopt a Tax Increment Financing Plan with respect thereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 and 469.174 to 469.179 (collectively the "Act"); 15 3EI.Hd B. The City Council has investigated the facts and has caused to be prepared an amended Development Program for Development District No. 1, and has caused to be prepared a proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1- 4; and C. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the creation of Housing District No. 1-4 and the adoption of the proposed modification of the Development Program and the adoption of the Tax Increment Financin9 Plan relating thereto, ~ncluding, but not limited to, notification of Ramsey County, Independent School District No. 622 and Special Intermediate School District No. 916 having taxing Jurisdiction over the property to be included in Housing District No. 1-4, and the holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood as follows: 1. De____velopment Program. The modification of the Development Program for Development District No. 1, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, is adopted as the Development Program for Development District No. 1. 2. Houslng Distr~ct No. ~-4. There is established in the City of Maplewood within Development District No. 1 Housing District No. 1-4, the initial boundaries of which are fixed and determined as described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan. 3. Tax Increment FinaDo~q~. The Tax Increment Financing Plan is adopted as the tax increment financing plan for Housing District No. 1-4, and the City Council makes the following findings: (a) Housing District No. 1-4 is a housing district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 11, the specific basis for such determination being that the multifamily rental housing development to be undertaken by The Cottaoes of Maplewood West Limited Partnership consists of a project, or a portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or familles of low and moderate income, as defined in chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act Of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts. 2 16 · ' .... , = gl <nHl', ,:IS (b) The proposed redevelopment in the opinion of the City Council, would not occur solely t]lrou~h private l~v~tment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The reasons supporting this finding are that: The Cottages of Maplewood West Limited Partnership has represented to the City that they would not undertake the project in Maplewood withOut the City's use of tax increment financing. Private investment will not finance these development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these development activities through the use of tax increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will occur within Development District No. 1. (c) The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-4 conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City of Maplewood as a whole. The reasons supporting this finding are that: (i) Housing District No. 1-4 is properly zoned; and (it) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will generally compliment and serve to implement pollci~ adopted in ~h~ City'~ comprehensive plan. (d) The Tax Incr~mmnt W~nmn~ng Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of thc City of Maplewood as a whole, for the development or red~vclopment of Development District No. 1 by private enterprise. The reasons supporting this finding are that: The development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by privat~ enterprise can occur within Development District No. 1. 4. Public Purpose. The modification of the Development Program for Development District No. l, and the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-4 conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act 25886 17 t, 29U,~ ~e. tt~29898,?.'Ot.t ~'..":~.I I~,,'g ',.zI ([IHI'.:, ,~S t.IVg:~Ol,I S99I~'t,'9 1,10:~.~ and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up to provide employment opportunities to improve the tax base, and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. 5. Certification. The Auditor of Ramsey County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of Housing District NO. 1-4 as described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased in accordance with the Act; and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within Housing District No. 1-4 for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this Resolution. 6. Filing. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-4 with the Commissioner of Revenue. 7. Administration. The administration of Development District No. ! is assigned to the City Clerk who shall from time -.t~. t'i~o'~o'g~-a~ad'mu-ch--p~rs--~nd--d~td~ ~u~udr,L Lo Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.130 and 469.131 as the City Council may deem appropriate. 8. public Hear~q. This Council shall meet on Monday, January 27, 1992, at approximately 7:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing on the following matters: (a) the proposed adoption of the Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1, and (b) the proposed adoption of the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-4 within Development District No. 1, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, both inclusive, as amended and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, both inclusive, as amended (collectively, the "Act"). 9. Notice of Hearing; Filing of. Program and Plan. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to cause a notice of the hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be published as required by the Act and to place a copy of the proposed Modified Development Program and Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan on file in the Clerk's Office at City Hall and to make such copies available for inspection by the public. 25~ 4 18 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: adopted. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and ~5886 5 19 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RA34SEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the modification of the Development Program for Development District No. 1, and the establishment of Housing District No. 1-4 in the City. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of December, 1991. (SEAL) City Clerk ~5886 6