Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/16/2000II. III. IV. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2000 CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. ROLL CALL Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Commissioner Jack Frost Commissioner Matt Ledvina Commissioner Paul Mueller Commissioner Gary Pearson Commissioner William Rossbach Commissioner Milo Thompson Commissioner Dale Trippler Staff Present: Recording Secretary: Present Present Present Absent Present Present Present Present Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Lori Hansen APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Frost moved approval of the agenda as submitted. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes-All The motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES " Commission Frost moved approval of the minutes of October 2nd, 2000 as submitted. Commissioner Pearson seconded the motion. The motion carries. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Ayes-All (Abstention-Mr. Ledvina) AT & T Monopole Conditional Use permit-1745 Cope Avenue Ken Roberts presented the staff report. AT & T Wireless is proposing to install a monopole up to 125 feet tall and an equipment building for wireless telecommunications. They would like to install the monople and building at 1745 Cope Avenue, on the southwest corner of the existing parking lot. The original request was submitted to the commission on September 7th, but was tabled at that point to give AT & T more time to try to work with Qwest communications about co-locating on the property on Gervais Court. Qwest was unable to meet AT & T's needs as they are not structurally able to extend the existing pole to the 122 foot height that AT & T would require and they do not have enough room on their site to allow for the installation of another monopole. -2- Staff and the owner of the Monson Insurance building at 1737 Cope Avenue are concerned about the preposed location of the monople and equipment building. There are other locations in this general area that staff considers more preferable for this facility. Any of these alternative locations for the monopole would have less impact on the Monson Insurance building and it would put it further from the residential properties south of Cope Avenue. In response to commission questions, Mr. Roberts noted the property owner for each of the preperties in question was the same, and he is leasing the Taste of India building out to the operators of the restaurant. The currently proposed site does meet the city ordinance for monopoles. Even though it does meet the ordinance, the staff feels there are other locations on site that would balance some of the oppositions. Commissioner Ledvina asked whether there would be any alternative sites located in the northwest corner of the property. Commissioner Thompson felt there could be some obstruction to the Taste of India signage. He also noted unlicensed vehicles parked in the lot north of Strauss Skates. Commissioner Trippler noticed the Strauss building had a delivery door in back, and wondered if AT & T would be subjecting themselves to possible damage from trucks backing up. He also questioned the response from AT & T regarding the alternative locations. Mr. Trippler also wondered why the property owner was not interested in other sites on the property. Julie Townsend was present from AT & T Wireless Services (2515 24th Avenue South, Mpls.) to answer questions. She stated the location they have selected is the location that is appreved and preferred by the owner of the property, Mr. Charbonneau. Ms. Townsend noted that Mr. Charbonneau is opposed to the suggested altemative locations for various reasons. She also stated that Mr. Charbonneau has future plans for the Strauss property and anything on the Strauss property would not be acceptable. Mr. Charbonneau's largest opposition was to the location directly in the center of property, which was unacceptable to him, and hindered any type of redevelopment in the future. In response to Commissioner Trippler's question as to whether she has talked to the owner from Monson Insurance, Ms. Townsend stated she had attempted to. She tried to contact Monson Insurance to talk to someone to discuss any landscaping they could possibly do, and discuss the building style of the proposed building that would make it somewhat less obtrusive. She left messages for the owner of Monson, his brether and an attorney, with no response. Ms. Townsend said she also contacted other companies in the area about leasing out their property with little to no response. Mr. Thompson referred to a New England Journal of Medicine article regarding the study of cell phones and accidents. According to the article, the accident ratio was four times greater within five minutes of a driver used their cell phone. He questioned whether or not AT & T was prepared to accept this responsibility. Ms. Townsend did not feel she was the proper person to answer that question, and did not have her marketing and safety specialist with her that evening. Randy Monson was present from Monson Insurance, 1737 Cope Avenue, as his father was out of the country. The owners are very concerned that the tower will significantly alter the character of the surrounding area, and if it will any adverse affect on the value of their and their neighbors properties, which is largely office and commercial. He felt just north of Highway 36 their are properties that are more commercial which he felt would be better suited for this type of project. Jim Miller was present from James Miller Investment Realty Company, 1 West Water Street Suite 400, St. Paul. He has a listing agreement for a vacant property owned by the St. Paul School Foundation that is immediately to the west of the Charbonneau property. He said they would be interested in leasing to AT & T for the monopole project. This site is approximately 26,000 square feet and on the north end of the property. Ms. Townsend could not remember if they had talked to the owner of this site but thought that since the property was landlocked (so they had no access to the property) that it would not meet AT & T's needs. -3- Commissioner Frost questioned if approving the recommendation does not necessarily mean building the monopole on the present property, or if it could be adjacent land. Staff felt the specific property referred to in the resolution was 1745 Cope Avenue and the legal description for it. The land lock situation is out of the city's hands. The user or developer of that property will have to work out an access agreement with one of the adjoining properties. There is an easement noted on the plat map. - Ms. Thompson reiterated they are requesting approval for a conditional use permit for a specific location. The applicant does not agree to the condition in the approval that states they shall revise the site plan by moving the lease area away from Monson Insurance, and asked that it be stricken and be rewritten to state Uas proposed". Mr. Trippler asked the staff if an applicant is required to bring all the expertise personnel necessary to answer questions that are likely to arise. Mr. Roberts stated they certainly hope that they would, but an applicant can not necessarily foresee every question that may come up. Mr. Pearson moved the council to adopt the resolution that would approve a conditional use permit to allow up to a 125-foot-tall telecommunications monopole and related equipment. This approval is for the property at 1745 Cope Avenue. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the ordinance and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans as approved by the city, including the location of the lease site. The applicant shall revise the site plan by moving the lease area away from the south property line to a new location that will have less impact on the Monson Insurance property. The revised site plan shall be subject to city staff approval. The director of community development may approve minor changes to the approved plan. The applicant shall verify the location of the property lines and existing site features around the lease area with a certificate of survey. 2. The applicant shall prepare and follow a landscape and screening plan that would help to hide the base area of the proposed facility (for any location). 3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 4. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 5. The applicant or owner shall allow the co-location of other providers' telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower with reasonable lease conditions. 6. Any antenna that is not used for a year shall be deemed abandoned and the city may require that it be removed. 7. The applicant or AT & T shall post a bond or other guarantee with the city to ensure proper removal of the antenna and Monopole and the restoration of the site. Mr. Ledvina seconded. Because the recommendation is for a specific address, Mr. Trippler stated he will not vote for the proposal when there is another suitable property that is available. 4 Ayes-(Frost, Ledvina, Pearson, Thompson) 3 Nays-(Trippler, Rossbach, Fischer) Xl. NEW BUSINESS Lot-Area and Lot-Width Variances-Southeast Corner of Roselawn Avenue and Kenwood Drive east Mr. Roberts gave the staff report for the city. Mr. Dennis Campbell i_s requesting that the City approve two variances to build a house on an existing lot. They are.' 1. A variance to build on a lot that is 69.5 feet wide (on the side street). City Code requires comer lots in the R-1 (single-dwelling residential) zoning district to have 100 feet of frontage on each public street and at least 75 feet of width at the building setback line. 2. A variance to build on lot that has an area of 8,400 square feet. City Code requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet for lots in the R-1 zone. This would require a variance of 1,600 square feet. Mr. Rossbach expressed concern that the back door to the home being built on the lot would open into the backyard of the abutting home which would diminish the neighbors privacy. Although the commission may only control the lot, he felt that the new house needs to be in character with the neighborhood. The new property line maps aro a groat tool to the commission as noted by Mr. Trippler. He also wanted to ensure, since elevations are not displayed, that the engineering department would need to approve the grading for the site before construction. Dennis Campbell, applicant, 1872 ^dele St., Maplewood, was present to answer questions. He clarified that the proposed back door to the home would face the side of the neighbors home, not their backyard. He did show the proposed plans of the colonial style home to the neighbors and they seemed very pleased with the project. Mr. Ledvina suggested the grade for the project may not be up to code due to there being a 4 foot hump on the property from curb to back. He also strongly agrees without being able to control the building, the proposal could be very much out of character for the neighborhood and not serve the variances well. Commissioner Frost made motion to move the council to adopt the resolution that would: Approve changing the zoning for the lot at the southeast comer of Roselawn Avenue and Kenwood Drive East and for the property at 800 Roselawn Avenue from R-1 (single- dwelling residential) to R(S) (small-lot single dwelling residential). The city is approving this change because it meets the findings required by code and because the applicant is proposing to build a single dwelling on the vacant property. Approve the resolution for a 15.5-foot variance to the zoning code to build a house on a corner lot that has 69.5 feet of street frontage (instead of the 85 feet required by code). The reasons for this variance are: 1. A house on this lot is in keeping with the character of the area. 2. The problem is due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the owner. 3. The variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes-5 (Fischer, Frost, Pearson, Thompson, Trippler) Nays-2 (Rossbach, Ledvina) -5- Mr. Rossbach stated the nay votes were not in any way an attempt to prevent Mr. Campbell from building a house on this lot. Their concern was that a house could be built that would be totally out of character for the neighborhood. In making the change to the R-I(S) and granting the variance, we are doing that so that it can be in character with the neighborhood. If the house that is built is out of character with the existing architectural designs that exist and if the house is not oriented properly on the lot, it ~,ill not be in. character. This proposal will go before the City Council at the November 13th meeting. VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS No visitors were present. VIII. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS IX. October 9th Council Meeting: Mr. Thompson reported on the Birch Glen project on Aerial Street and County Road D. The council did ask the plans to include a playground for children. The proposed levy certification tax rate increase was approved. This is preliminary until all of the referendum is resolved. If it goes through as proposed there will an 11.9% increase in taxes. Pineview Estates agreed to add a playground and picnic tables on the northeast portion of the property. Mr. Collins and Ms. Wasilluk will be the representatives for the Rush Line Corridor. The council also discussed a request to study the left turn signal on the corner of White Bear Avenue and Lydia. The advocacy issue came up in view of the referendum being voted on Election Day. It clarified that city employees may not use city time, phones, stationary or copiers to advocate the referendum. They can be an advocate but on their time. October 23 Council Meeting: Commissioner Ledvina will be attending this meeting. Emma's Place and Countryside Volkswagon will be on the agenda. C. November 13th Meeting: Commissioner Rosbach will be attending. The AT&T Monopole and the Roselawn- Kenwood Lot Variance will be on the agenda. Mr. Roberts will talk to Melinda Coleman about inviting the Police Chief to a meeting to discuss enforcement of the current and proposed parking codes. The new city manager, Mr. Fuhrsman started his new position today, and the board expressed their desire to invite him to a commission meeting. STAFF PRESENTATIONS None ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:58 p.m. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit - Affordable Auto Sales 1930 Rice Street November 15, 2000 INTRODUCTION Mike Whitelaw and Tom Godes are requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to sell used cars from 1930 Rice Street. Refer to the maps and sketch on pages 6-10 and the letter on page 11. DISCUSSION cuP and Parking Staff does not see a problem with used car sales on this site as long as it is well maintained and well operated. Being well maintained means that the site must be kept in presentable and neat condition--building and site alike. Being well operated means that the applicant's must not allow cars on the site beyond the limits of the striped parking spaces. A large problem with such car lots is that cars (inventory as well as costumers) expand into the drive aisles. A site intended for 19 cars should not become one with additional vehicles squeezed onto the property. Doing so creates congestion, disorder and unsightliness. We recently had a problem with Minnesota Motors on Century Avenue where cars were parked all over the site in drive aisles, by customers in posted "no parking' areas and also on neighboring property. Overflow parking onto street shoulders is not allowed. Rice Street is not posted for "no parking" but it seems highly unlikely parking would occur along that busy roadway. Roselawn Avenue is posted "no parking" so off-site parking should not happen there. The applicant must, therefore, contain their parking on their site. Building and Site Design The applicant is proposing to stripe the site with 19 parking spaces-one would be a handicap- accessible space. The site is a little tight but it should be adequate for the applicants needs as laid it out. The parking spaces, however, with the exception of the handicap space, should be no less than 9 % feet wide as code requires. The applicant has already resurfaced the parking lot with bituminous paving. While repaving the parking lot they also expanded the pavement surface on the south side of the building. Refer to the landscaping plan on page 8. The applicants have also started refurbishing the outside of the building. They added light grey horizontal-lap vinyl siding on the south and west elevations, replaced windows on the west elevation and eliminated windows on the south side. The east and north sides of the building would remain sided with the existing rectangular metal panels. They propose to place a red neon accent stdpe along the top edge of the building. They began this work without applying for a building permit. The Maplewood Building Inspection Office stopped the work and told Mr. Whitelaw that he must get a permit to continue. In spite of starting this work before getting city council approval and a building permit, these changes are improvements over the former building appearance. Landscaping Plan The applicants should edge around the planting beds and provide wood-chip or rock-mulch with a weed block to keep them neat. Staff would recommend trees along the frontages, but this site has no "on site" green area. The green areas are on street right-of-way where trees should not be planted. The applicants should also sod the exposed dirt area east of their Roselawn Avenue curb cut. Signs Identification signs have not been proposed. The existing pylon sign structures on the site do not likely meet the city code requirements for setbacks. The applicants must make sure that their sign requests meet code requirements. Outdoor Trash Storage Trash containers that are kept outside must be kept in screening enclosures. This is a code requirement. Outdoor Material Storage The city council should prohibit any outdoor storage of materials whether used or new. For instance, old tires, or any other new or used materials unless they can be concealed in a trash enclosure. COMMITTEE ACTIONS November 14, 2000: The community design review board recommended approval of the plans. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on pages 12-13 approving a conditicnal use permit for used car sales at 1930 Rice Street. Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. The site shall be kept in neat and orderly condition. The applicant shall observe the striping pattern and not crowd additional cars on the site beyond what can be parked in the stdped parking spaces. 2 There shall be no vehicle delivery or transport/trailer unloading along either street. This shall be done on site. Outdoor storage of any new or used materials shall be prohibited unless they can be fully concealed within a trash enclosure. The design and placement of any such enclosure shall be subject to staff approval. Approval of the plans date-stamped October 19, 2000 for Affordable Auto Sales at 1930 Rice Street. Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to the applicant's complying with the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Provide the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit: a. Revise the site plan to show 9 %-foot-wide parking spaces and one eight-foot-wide handicap parking space. The handicap space shall also have an eight-foot-wide striped loading aisle. The applicant shall close the southerly curb cut on Rice Street and curb across the opening at the street edge. This driveway shall be restored with sod. The driveway closing shall meet with MnDOT specifications. The applicant shall obtain a MnDOT permit if one is required for this driveway closing. b. Revise the landscape plan to show that the planting beds have edging, weed block fabric and rock or wood-chip mulch. c. Revise the building elevations showing the east and north sides of the building painted light grey to match the siding color. d. A plan for a trash dumpster enclosure for outside trash containers if used (code requirement). This plan must show the placement and design of the enclosure. Trash enclosures must have a 100 percent opaque closeable gate. Enclosures must be of a material that matches or is compatible with the building. e. An escrow in the amount of 200 percent of the cost of installing the landscaping, installing stop signs, striping the parking lot, closing/restoring the southerly driveway on Rice Street and building a trash enclosure (if used) before obtaining a building permit. This is to guarantee the completion of this work. 3. Complete the following: a. Install a reflectorized stop sign at both Rice Street exits and a handicap-parking sign for the handicap-parking space. b. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure for any outside trash containers if used. c. Stripe the parking lot at 9Y~-foot-wide spaces with one eight-foot-wide handicap- accessible parking space with an adjacent eight-foot-wide loading space. d. Install the planting beds. e. Paint the north and east sides of the building to match the siding color. f. Adjusting the site light that is mounted on the canopy to aim downward toward the site, not outward into drivers' eyes. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Complying with the requirements of the sign ordinance. The two existing signs along Rice Street are not grandfathered in. The applicant shall remove these and comply with the city sign code. REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 12,500 square feet Existing land use: This property was originally a fuel station. Most recently it was an auto-glass and auto-stereo installation facility. SURROUNDING LAND USES North: South: West: East: Zittel Greenhouse property Roselawn Avenue and Rose/Rice Used Auto Sales RiCe Street. Across Rice Street are commercial businesses in the City of Roseville Zittel Greenhouse property PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial) Zoning: BC Ordinance Requirements Section 36-151(b)(5)(a) requires a CUP for the sale or leasing of used motor vehicles. Criteria for Conditional Use Permit Approval Section 36-442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 12-13. Application Date These applications were complete on October 19, 2000. State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. City council action is required on this proposal by December 19, 2000. p:secl 8~afford.2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Landscape Plan 5. Building Perspective 6. Applicant's Letter dated October 13, 2000 7. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 8. Plans date-stamped October 19, 2000 (separate attachment) LITTLE SAINT LOCATION MAP 6 'I (.9) I .~-3 o.e.. BC ZITTEL GREENHOUSE ~'_ PROPERTY PROPOSED AFFORDABLE AUTO SALES o (~ ---., ROSELAWN AVENUE ROSE/RICE USED PROPERTY LINE ! ZONING MAP ATTACHMENT 3 I-- ILl UJ LU ROSELAWN AVENUE SITE PLAN LU LU o & I'AI~X:]N Ml'' DAYULY I.~ ~ DA'I1JLY GOLD.AMI 5~R~ - (GOLDEN I MANLY JUNII'~It, - NOT~: MULCJI ALL LANO'3CAI'L'~ A,v,~=.A~. NO I~XIST. F%ANT1NG5 TO I~ R~J,4OV~.D EXCI~r .500 ~N ! J ROSELAWN AVENUE LANDSCAPING PLAN AUTOMOTIVE DEAl FRSI-II? 10 ~. il,il, .I i .~, ,i : ll.l,~ Ill .I i.!'i ' i~ '.~! !.l,!!l!!~l!l!, ATTACHMENT 5'" ~ /'~ I I /'~t-,l-II'lr' lY I ~J October 13, 2000 City of Maplewood, At the following address of 1930 Rice Street, we are looking at putting an upscale used car lot, which will be housing fifteen to twenty cars. Plans have already been drawn up with an architect for improvements of approximately thirty thousand dollars to improve the overall appearance of the building including repaving the lot, building's exterior, and horticulture around the entire property. This location was chosen because of the amount of traffic already present and the easy accessibility to and from the property. The area has been zoned for this type of business with a current car lot across the street directly to the south and a full service automotive station directly to the west. With planned improvements already in progress to the building and its surroundings, the value of the property will stay the same, if not increase. With continued improvements and planned maintenance the area will only become more inviting to the general public while becoming an asset to the City of Maplewood. Naturally a thriving business is a much better economic value than a vacant lot. We will also be having the opportunity to employ a few people from the community, which will enhance the development of the area. Our projected hours of business are 10am to 7pm Monday thru Friday and 10am to 5pm on Saturdays. We will be selling reputable cars and doing only minimal car maintenance, like oil changes, to only the cars being sold. ,All other work will be done off site. The lot will be lit up by the use of halogen lights, which will not be shinning on the neighbor's property. It will be closed off at night and the use of security cameras around the lot will help deter any unwanted / negative behavior. We would appreciate your consideration in this request. We are willing to work with the City of Maplewood in any way to make this possible. Sincerely, Tom Godes if you have any questions please call Mike Whitelaw at (612) 296-6661. '. ii~.i ,L]. ~:..¢~ i~ ~ '\.. I~--~~ OCI 1 9 Attachment 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mike Whitelaw and Tom Godes, representing G & W Investment Corporation, applied for a conditional use permit to be permitted to operate a used car sales business. WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 193 Rice Street. The legal description is: THE WEST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH 158 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. permit. ,2000, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this On ,2000, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approve this permit because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. The use would not depreciate property values. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on All construction shall follow the site plan apProved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city counCil shall review this permit in one year. 4. The site shall be kept in neat and ordedy condition. The applicant shall obsen/e the stdping pattern and not crowd additional cars on the site beyond what can be parked in the stdped parking spaces. 5. There shall be no vehicle delivery or transportJtrailer unloading along either street. This shall be done on site. 6. Outdoor storage of any new or used materials shall be prohibited unless they can be fully concealed within a trash enclosure. The design and placement of any such enclosure shall be subject to staff approval. ,2000. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Preliminary Plat and Design Review - Emerald Estates Townhomes County Road D, east of Hazelwood Street November 14, 2000 INTRODUCTION Project Description Mr. Klm Tramm, of Tramm Builders & Realtors, is proposing to build a 12-unit townhome development on County Road D, west of the Maple Ridge Apartments. Refer to the maps on pages 7-9. Mr. Tramm is requesting approval of a preliminary plat to create individual lots and approval of the site, landscaping and architectural plans. The proposed buildings would have horizontal-lap vinyl siding. There would be brick wainscot as an accent. The siding color would be light green, trim would be white. Refer to the applicants color description on page 11. DISCUSSION Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat for the 12 units meets the city's density requirements for high-density residential development. Having a lot for each unit will allow the developer to sell each unit individually. This project would fit into this multi-family area lying between the Maple Ridge Apartments and the future Pineview Estates townhomes. These 12 new units should not contribute significantly to the traffic load on County Road D. Twelve more units would be negligible compared to the prop3sed 72-unit Pineview Estates townhomes and the 100-unit Maple Ridge Apartments. Building Design The buildings would be attractive. The applicant indicated in his building description that the colors are subject to change. The applicant should be reasonably certain about their proposed colors by the time they appear before the community design review board (CDRB). The CDRB also needs to see color and material samples at their meeting for review. Site Issues Driveway Closinq The curb cut should be widened to 30 feet and have ten-foot turning radii. The existing easterly driveway should be closed and the street curb extended across that opening. Right-of-Way Dedication The applicant has shown a 10-foot-wide right-of-way dedication on the preliminary plat (Sheet 2 of 4). The city does not need this additional right-of-way for street widening. The applicant should, however, dedicate this 10 feet as a drainage and utility easement. The city typically requires the drainage and utility easements along all the perimeter property lines. These easements are typically ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. Landscaping Plan The proposed landscaping would be attractive. Staff recommends that the applicant sod all green areas. It was not shown on plan how turf would be established. The hillside to the north could be seeded if the applicant prefers seed over sod in that area. Also, the city code requires that all landscaped areas have an in-ground lawn irrigation provided. Board Approval Required The applicant must apply to the Ramsey / Washington Metro Watershed District for a permit. The watershed board requires a district permit for sites that exceed one acre. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approve the plans date-stamped October 25, 2000 for the Emerald Estates preliminary plat. The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Pay the city for the cost of any traffic-control or no parking signs. d. Provide all required and necessary easements. 2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall show: (1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) The driveway grades. o (4) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements from the affected property owner(s). c. The street, driveway and utility plans shall show: (1) All the parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb and gutter. (2) The coordination of the water main alignments and sizing with the standards and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS). Fire flow requirements and hydrant locations shall be verified with the Maplewood Fire Department. (3) All utility excavations located within the proposed right-of-ways or within easements. The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would be outside the project area. Pay the costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans. Change the plat as follows: a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Show drainage and utility easements along all the site perimeter property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including any off-site drainage and utility easements. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. Submit the homeowner's association bylaws and rules to the director of community development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the maintenance of the private utilities, driveways and structure. Record the following with the final plat: a. All homeowner's association documents. b. ^ covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the lots or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved by the city council. The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for approval before recording. 9. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Approve the plans (date-stamped October 25, 2000) for Emerald Estates Townhomes, based on the findings required by the code. The developer, Tramm Builders and Realtors, shall do the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before getting a building permit the applicant shall: a. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. b. Submit the building color scheme to staff for approval if the community design review board has not already approved the colors. c. Submit a revised site plan showing the closing of the old eastedy ddveway opening. This opening must be curbed over and the boulevard restored. The proposed curb cut shall be 30 feet wide with 10-foot turning radii. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. Sod all landscaped areas, except the hillside to the north which shall be sodded or seeded. c. Install a reflectodzed stop sign at the exit. d. Install an automatic in-ground irrigation system with a rain sensor for all landscaped areas, except for the hillside to the north. e. Install continuous concrete curbing. f. Close the old easterly driveway opening. This old opening must be curbed over and the boulevard restored. g. Post "no parking" signs on site in locations required by the fire marshal. 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. 4 bo The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 200 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.23 acres Existing land use: A single dwelling and accessory buildings SURROUNDING LAND USES North: South: West: East: White Bear Lake across Interstate 694 Undeveloped land across County Road D Approved Pineview Estates Townhomes (approved on October 9, 2000) Maple Ridge Apartments PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: R3(H) (multiple dwelling residential-high density) Zoning: R3 (multiple dwelling residential) Application Date We received these applications on October 25, 2000. State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. The city council must take action on these proposals by December 25, 2000. p:sec34-30/emerald.pIt Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Building Elevations 5. Building Color Description 6. Plans date-stamped October 25, 2000 (separate attachments) ATTACHMENT 1 LOCATION MAP il ,300' I I ;. · : .I GOFF HOME'S PINEVIEW ESTATES Al,It .,~i(..ApPROVED) m-m~m~la-COUNTY ROAD D · PROPOSED EMERALD ESTATES SITE ~I~APARTM ENTS EMERALD ESTATES TOWNHOMES TRUNK HIGHWAY 393-694 3 4 .{ ROAD D Il SITE PLAN'9 ~NG COLORS~~ RE: EMERALD ESTATE TOWNHOME~~ DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 SIDING: LIGHT GREEN BRICK: RED TRIM: LINEN SHINGLE: WEATHEREDWOOD WINDOWS AND OTHER ACCENTS: WHITE COLORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. OBJECTIVE OF THE COLOR SCHEME WOULD BE TO COMPLIMENT THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. MORE EARTH TONE COLORS THAN OTHER COLOR SELCTIONS. TRAMM BUILDERS & REALTORS DATE: 200 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Carpet Court Northwest Comer of Larpenteur Avenue and Arcade Street November 14, 2000 INTRODUCTION Project Description Gary Blair, of Carpet Court, is proposing to build an 8,160-square-foot, two-story building for his carpet store and warehouse. The proposed building would have an extedor of flat concrete block with accent striping of rock-face block. The flat block would be "linen white." The rock-face block would be colored ~lilac,' a color in the purple range according to the architect. Refer to the attachments on pages 8-11 and the plans (separate attachments). Requests Mr. Blair is requesting that the city council approve: 1. Rezoning the westedy part of the site from R1 (single dwelling residential) to BC (business commercial). The city has planned this property for BC use. Refer to the map on page 10 and the applicant's letter on page 12. 2. A 25-foot building setback vadance from the west lot line. The code requires a 75-foot setback--the applicant is proposing 50 feet. Refer to the site plan on page 11 and the letter on pages 13-14. 3. A 13 percent impervious surface area variance from the shoreland ordinance. The code requires that the applicant cover no more than 50 percent of the site with building, asphalt and concrete (impervious materials). The applicant's site plan shows a coverage of 63 percent. Refer to the applicant's letter on page 15. 4. Site, landscape and architectural plans. BACKGROUND This site previously had a fuel station in the 1960s and 1970s. The building then became a video-rental before being demolished. DISCUSSION Rezoning Staff would recommend approval of this rezoning if not for concerns with the proposed variances (discussed below). The proposed BC rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Refer to the map on page 9. Staff feels, however, that rezoning is premature unless there is a viable site plan that staff can support without the need for large variances. Variances State law requires that the city council make two specific findings to approve variances. These are: Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. "Undue hardship" means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The "hardship' must be due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner. It must also be determined that the variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Hardship Making the "hardship' determination because of circumstances unique to the property is always the hardest to make. Unique circumstances are elements like an oddly-shaped site which makes it difficult to place a building (like Forest Products on County Road C and Highway 61) or perhaps a lot with a steep slope that the builder must stay away from to construct a building, thereby limiting the developable area of the site. In this case, however, there are no unique physical circumstances with the property. The applicant's building is just too large to fit the site with the limitations of the zoning code. These limitations are the requirement for a 75-foot side yard setback from. the west lot line and the 50 percent impervious surface area coverage limit. A smaller building could meet setback requirements, would require less parking and could meet the maximum impervious area requirement. The applicant would need to reduce the amount of impervious surface area by 3,894 square feet (building, asphalt, sidewalk) to meet the 50 percent maximum lot coverage requirement. It is difficult to determine what size of building the applicant could build under the rules. It depends on how much floor area would be used as sales floor and how much would be warehousing. As an example, though, an approximate building size, with enough parking to meet the code, would be 5,500 square feet in area. This size building would need 17 parking spaces (assuming half of the building would be showroom and the other half warehousing). Spidt and Intent If meeting the "spirit and intent" of the code was enough to satisfy the state law, staff would feel reasonably comfortable with the proposed westerly setback. This is because the west side of the proposed building jogs in 15.5 feet. This 15.5-foot jog lessens the visual impact of the building 2 as viewed from the west. If the entire building was 50 feet from the west lot line it would cause a greater visible impact to the neighbor. Drainage Plan This site is within the shoreland boundary of Round Lake, a Class 5 water. The code requires that property within a Class 5 shoreland have no more than 30 percent impervious surface coverage: A site can have buildings and hard surfaces up to 50 percent impervious, however, if the applicant provides an on-site method for stormwater treatment. The applicant is proposing an infiltration pond to meet this requirement. Chris Cavett, the Maplewood Assistant City Engineer, has reviewed the plans for the pond and has accepted the pond design. Mr. Cavett recommended rainwater-garden plantings in the pond area, however. Site Plan Concerns The number of proposed parking spaces meet code requirements (23 required and 23 proposed). The handicap-accessible parking space should be revised, however, to comply with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. This requires an eight-foot-wide handicap- parking space with an adjacent eight-foot-wide cross-striped loading area. The westerly access ddve is too narrow. This must be widened to 24 feet for parking space access (code requirement). If the parking spaces are not needed, perhaps they could be omitted and the drive aisle left at 16 feet as shown for dock access. The applicant would need a parking waiver from the city council to omit these spaces, however. Building Design The applicant is proposing flat concrete block as the pdmary extedor material. The community design review board (CDRB) has not allowed 8- by 16-inch flat block as a primary matedal for many years. There are decorative block alternatives available. Staff has discussed this with the applicant. The applicant's architect suggested using all rock-face block with precolored flat block for the accent stdpes. Staff suggests that the CDRB not take action on the building exterior unless they review, and accept, an alternative to the fiat block. The applicant also stated that they would bring in color samples for the board to review. Landscaping Staff feels that the applicant should provide a six-foot-tall decorative wood fence along the entire west lot line as a buffer for the neighbor to the west. The proposed trees would be attractive, but spaced at 15 feet on center would not provide the six-foot-tall and 80 percent opaque screening the code requires. The five fir trees that are shown along the west lot line should be moved to supplement the small mugho pines proposed. Two of the fir trees should be placed on the south side of the building and the other three along the service road frontage. RECOMMENDATIONS Deny the proposed rezoning from R1 (single dwelling residential) to BC (business commercial). Denial of this rezoning is because of needed site plan revisions. As proposed, the site plan would require two variances that are not justified. B. Deny the 25-foot side yard setback variance for the proposed 50-foot setback from the west lot line. (The code requires 75 feet.) Denial of this vadance is because: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. The building proposed is simply too large. The property can be put to reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls. The applicant could meet setback requirements with a smaller building that would fit the site better. Deny the proposed 13 percent impervious surface area variance from the shoreland ordinance which would allow 63 percent land coverage. The code requires that the applicant cover no more than 50 percent of the site with building, asphalt and concrete (impervious materials). Denial of this vadance is because: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would not cause undue hardship because of circumstance unique to the property. The building proposed is simply too large. The property can be put to reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls. The applicant could meet the lot-coverage requirements with a smaller building that would fit the site better. Deny the plans date-stamped September 11, 2000 for Carpet Court at the northwest comer of Larpenteur Avenue and Arcade Street. Denial of the plans is because staff is recommending denial of the proposed rezoning from R1 (single dwelling residential) to BC (business commercial) and denial of the two site-plan variances. CITIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed the 22 property owners within 350 feet of this site. Of the two replies, one was in favor and one was opposed. In Favor On the basis of the information we received from you, we have no problem with the granting of the requested variance. (Pastor Koch, Gustavus Adolphus Church, 1669 Arcade Street) Opposed We do not want the building put up, it is too big and will be too much noise and traffic. The land is too small for a warehouse and showroom. Please do not let them put it up. Let us know when you have a meeting on this. Thank you. (Palme, 1721 Arcade Street) REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 29,803 square feet (.68 acres) Existing land use: Vacant with an unapproved storage yard SURROUNDING LAND USES North: South: West: East: Former Bacchus Homes office and a single dwelling Larpenteur Avenue and Gustavus Adolphus Lutheran Church Single dwellings Highway 61 (Arcade Street) and Phalen Golf Course PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC Zoning: existing - R1 and BC; proposed - all BC Code Requirement Section 36-28(c)(6)(b)(2) of the city code requires that buildings with between 2000- and 2999-square feet of extedor wall-surface area facing a residential lot be set back 75 feet from the adjacent residential lot. Section 36-566(3)(a) of the city code requires that within the shoreland boundary of Round Lake, a "Class 5" water, no more than 30 percent of the site shall be covered with an impervious surface. A site can have impervious area up to 50 percent if the applicant provides an on-site method for stormwater treatment. Criteria for Variance Approval State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance from the zoning code: 1. Stdct enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The vadance would be in keeping with the spidt and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship", as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Application Date We received these applications on September 11, 2000. On October 17, 2000, the applicant asked us to stop work on his applications so he could consider making plan changes. On November 2, 2000, Mr. Blair phoned and asked us to proceed with his original request. He chose not to revise them. State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. City council aCtion is required on this proposal by January 2, 2001. p:sec17~carpet.2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Land Use Map 3. Property Line / Zoning Map 4. Site / Landscaping Plan 5. Rezoning Justification date-stamped September 11,2000 6. Setback Variance Justification date-stamped September 11,2000 7. Site Coverage Variance Justification date-stamped October 10, 2000 8. Plans date-stamped September 11,2000 (separate attachments) Attachment 1 (~) ca.ems st AW., Jt LOCATION MAP I ~ Attachment 2 .Larpenteur major artev .-~p inte; le ), E R-2' o 3(H) o PARKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN G E B¢I 77~., 170{ d721 S L?P: P.'T. E~tO. 9 BACCHUS HOMES ,E~vm~, Attachment 3. 1, PROPOSED PROPOSED CARPET COURT SITE g P.o.'T. 0 e- 00.o REZONING TO BC Attachment 4 ~,....., imm IIIIll/mm m J , PROPOSED ' CARPET COURT ., ~i~l ~- ' ~'..! 0 Z 0 LARPENTEUR AVENUE SITE PLAN 11 Attachment 5 Maplewood, Ramsey County, Mn. Submitted by Gary A. & Aileen M. Blair Answer to question #2 of the filing requirements. The rezoning of this property will vastly improve the property of which we have made application. The property currently is a vacant lot adjoining 2 commercially rated lots. When purchased, it was all sold to us as one unit. When reviewing the property surrounding the lot in question, the property to the North is operated with commercial rating by Bacchus Homes. To the south there is a church and its adjoining parking lot and to the east, the two commercial lots we own. Prior to our purchase of the lot, it had been used for the purpose of storing vehicles for sale. The property had not been maintained in that the grass had been allowed to grow and quite frankly it had been an eyesore in the neighborhood. Maple trees have been designated for planting making the rear portion of the property parklike in nature. The work will be completed by a professional landscape developer. The adjoining property which is located on Arcade Street is already zoned for the commercial environment and the majority of the building will be situated on that parcel of land. Our building will be an asset to the neighborhood both by the clean lines created in the building itself, the landscaping surrounding the property and the parking facilities which will be maintained by the busirtess housed therein. The business will be a decorating studio. We are a well established business located in St. Paul and have operated in our current location for approximately 22 years. The products to be marketed to the residents of the area include floor coverings of all types, window treatments, wall coverings, cabinets and counter tops as well as ceramic tile for all areas on the home. We operate a rather quiet business and currently are open 2 evening per week. We are also closed on Sunday. Business traffic would be generated primarily during regular business hours. S EP 1 12000 12 Attachment 6 Variance Application of property described as Lot 5, Block 1 VanHouten's Plat - Maplewood, Ramsey County, Mn. Submitted by Gary A. & Aileen M. Blair SEP 1 Answer to question ~fl of the filing requirements. The building proposed for this property will vastly improve the property of which we have made application. The property currently is a vacant lot adjoining 2 commercially rated lots. When purchased, it was all sold to us as one unit. When reviewing the property surrounding the lot in question, the property to the North is operated with commercial rating by Bacchus Homes. To the south there is a church and its adjoining parking lot and to the east, the two commercial lots we own. Prior to our purchase of the lot, it had been used for the purpose of storing vehicles for sale. The property had not been maintained in that the grass had been allowed to grow and quite frankly it had become an eyesore in the neighborhood. Maple trees have been designated for planting in our landscape design making the rear portion of the property parklike in nature. The work will be completed by a professional landscape developer. The adjoining property facing Arcade Street is zoned for the commercial environment and the majority of the building will be situated on that parcel of land. Our building will be an asset to the neighborhood both by the clean lines created in the building itself, the landscaping surrounding the property and the parking facilities which will be maintained by the busirless housed therein. The back of the building which is proposed for the property is divided into two sections. The warehouse section sits 50' from the rear of the lot and is 20' in height, with an exposed wall of 1338 square feet. A 20' height requirement is essential for the warehouse area due to the fact that a forklift is required for the storage of floor covering products. There is also another section of the building which is offset from the warehouse portion and sits 65' from the rear of the lot and has 1220 square feet exposed. The total exposure is 558 sf over your allowance, that is if the 1220 sf offset is not taken into consideration. Because of the offset, it visually reduces the appearance in the size of the building. We are unable to move the building forward on the property due to city regulations and set-back requirements, as well as parking requirements which are met in the building plans as they are outlined for the City of Maplewood. 13 If we are unable to obtain a variance for this building, we would be in a position where we would have to eliminate the entire warehouse structure to comply with your requirements and that would give us no reason whatever to build. We are currently operating on the East Side of St. Paul and our current showroom has no warehouse. That is the primary reason for relocating our business in your community. The business will be a decorating studio. We are a well established business operating in St. Paul for over 26 years, and have operated in our current location for approximately 22 years. The products to be marketed to the residents of the area include floor coverings of all types, window treatments, wall coverings, cabinets and counter tops as well as ceramic tile for all areas on the home. We operate a rather quiet business and currently are open 2 evening per week. We are also closed on Sunday. Business traffic Would be generated primarily during regular business hours. Attachment 7 Variance Application of property described as Lot §, Clock 1 VanHouten'$ Plat - M~plewood, Ramsey County, Mn. Submitted by Gary A. & Aileen M. Blair Answer to question #1, sub division "a" regarding wetland variance of the filing requirements. In our construction plans, we have complied with the majority of restrictions recommended by the City of Maplewood, however it seems that we are a little over the requirements outlined for coverage of the property with parking & building coverage. We have attempted to keep the building and it's surrounding parking lot within the requirments you have outlined and believe that we did out best for meeting our needs as well as those of the City. The amount of overage amounts to only 13% and that overage is due to meeting the requirements for parking, curbing, and sidewalks for the building as outlined. To compensate for the overage, we have planned to install an oversized holding pond with an overflow connecting into a 60" storm sewer as you will note on the drawings which have been submitted. This oversized holding pond will care for the water run off from the building and land and we have been assured by the Civil engineer that it is more than adequate for the size of the building being constructed. The water drainage from the parking area in the front of the building is being diverted to an existing culvert for run off. This culvert has cared for the water run off of the property to date, and our civil engineer assures us that it is adequate for the amount of water run off we can expect with the parking areas planned as outlined on the plans submitted. Strict enforcement of the requirements for wetland coverage will make the property unbuildable for our purposes. Our warehouse area covers approximately 4,000 sq.ft, of area. To meet the wetland requirement would facilitate the necessity of eliminating the total space outlined for the warehouse as you have required over 3,800 of land mass to be left uncovered. There will therefore be no alternative than to forfeit the building in lieu of receiving the variance. We hope that this variance will be accepted by the City of Maplewood as we desire to move ahead on this building project. We know that the entire area will be enhanced by the improvements to the property and that the value of the surrounding properties will enhanced as well. OCl 1 0 2000 15 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager Melinda Coleman, Community Development Director PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT November 14, 2000 INTRODUCTION The planning commission has a vacancy created by the resignation of Michael Seeber. This term ends on December 31, 2001. I have attached a map of where the current planning commission members live, a map of where the candidates live and the candidate's applications. (See pages 2-18). BACKGROUND The planning commission's rules of procedure state that the commission shall recommend candidates based on qualifications and a representative geographical distribution of members. RECOMMENDATION Interview the applicant's for the planning commission vacancy and make a recommendation to the city council. After the interviews, the city council should appoint a person to fill the unexpired term on the planning commission. Since this term would end on December 31, 2001, the council should appoint this person to serve until December 31, 2001. (This would be for the remainder of the term.) kr/p:misc/pcappt.00 Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Membership Map 2. Planning Commission Applicants Location Map 3. Six Applications CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ~ County of Romsey. Minnesolo ~ 1B30 lost County Rood B, Uoplewood, Mn. [ 0 (651) 770-4500 55109 LEGEND MAPLEWOOD PLANNING Lorraine B. Fischer, Chair 1812 Furness Street Maplewood MN 55109 Dale Trippler 1201 Junction Avenue Maplewood MN 55109-3433 Paul Mueller 1820 Onacrest Court Maplewood MN 55117 Milo J. Thompson 1794 Onacrest Curve Maplewood MN 55117 ATTACHMENT 1 COMMISSIOI" Matt Ledvina 1173 Lakewood Dr S Maplewood MN 55119 William Rossbach 1386 County Road C Maplewood, Mn 55109 Gary Pearson 1209 Antelope Way Mapiewood MN 55119 Jack Frost 2324 Maple Lane East Maplewood MN 55109 N 2 ATTACHME'NT'2- CITY OF MAPLEWOOD County o! Romsey, M~nnesota 1530 £ast County Poad g, Mopiewood. Mn. (&SI) 770--4500 55109 LEGEND PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS 1. Eric Ahlness 2062 English Street Maplewood, MN 55109 2. Ricky DeVries 817 Kenwood Lane Maplewood, MN 55117 3. Mary Dierich 2720 Carver Avenue Maplewood, MN 55119 4. Diana Longrie-Kline 1778 DeSoto Street Maplewood, MN 55117 5. Steve Martinson 2969 Frank Street Maplewood, MN 55109 6. Donna Ryan 2424 Bush Avenue Maplewood MN 55119 NAME Eric D. Ahlness CITY OF MAPLEW ME T 3 BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM NOV 1 3 2000 ADDRESS 2062 Enqlish Street Haplewood MN PHONE NO. Work: 651 282-4401 Home: 651. 486-9402 ZIP 55109 DATE 10 Nov 2000 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? 8 years 2} Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Comments: Yes No x~ 2000 3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check) __ Community Design Review Board __ Park & Recreation Commission __ Housing & Redevelopment Authority × Planning Commission __ Human Relations Commission __ Police Civil Service Commission 4) Do you have any specific areas ofinterest withinthis Board's or Commission's scope ofresponsibilities? I am interested in the relationship of business placement to residential properties. Urban planning and zoning ordinances is very interesting to me and directly applicable to Local issues. The community of Maplewood has special challenges due to the extensive boundaries and dynamic growth within its borders. 5) Listotherorganizations orclubsinthe Communityin which you have been orare an active pa~icipant: I have actively participated in neighborhood programs since my family and I moved to Maplewood. We quickly formed a neighborhood watch group and have been block captains ever since for our area. Both my wife and I have "graduated" from the Maplewood Citizen Academy sponsored by the city's police department. I am also an active member of a local church and its outreach programs (Joseph's Coat and food shelf programs). 6) Why would youliketo serve onthis Board or Commission? First, I want to participate in my communit and continue to make Maplewood an excellent place to live and raise a family. I believe that citizens have a responsibility to involve themselves in their local government to facilitate continued con, unity development. Second, I have an undergraduate degree in Geography that includes courses in community development and urban geography. I also have a Masters degree in Political Science that includes courses in local government. My practical expe~ience is in working with zoning administrators as a graduate assistant. My role as the coordinator ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: for the Minnesota Association of County Planning and Zoning Administrators was to develop professional accreditation programs, seminars, and newsletters for the association. I have extensive recent experience in facilitating a major building project between the city of Mankato, Blue Earth County, and the Minnesota National Guard. I facilitated discussion, design, funding, and approval of this $7.5 million facility. The project was a cooperative effort between federal, sta~, and local officials and staff. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC. FORMS\BRD&COMM.~,PL 4 10196 ADDRESS oO//'~ J('~'/z. Ocx~,.O PHONE NO. Work: ,/o/~-,_~/O- ~/'~,~' Home: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM DATE 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? ~,x'~'O4,A/~-¢ 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Comments: Yes No 3) 4) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check) __ Community Design Review Board __ Park & Recreation Commission __ Housing & Redevelopment Authority /)~ Planning Commission __ Human Relations Commission __ Police Civil Service Commission Do you have any specific areas of inter~st within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsil~ilitie~? 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: 6) Why w,ould you like to serve on this Board or Commission? . ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC. · 5 FORMS\SRD&COMM APL NAME ,~ary I PHONE NO, Work: ~ ID- ,/o 2,_%--C~-/7 7 Home: CITY oF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM G ,%1- 7~ I - 'ZeD ?~B DATE ZIP 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? 13 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Comments: Yes, No X 3) 4) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check) __ Community Design Review Board __ Park & Recreation Commission __ Housing & Redevelopment Authority ~ Planning Commission __ Human Relations Commission __ Police Civil Service Commission Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities? 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: p~e ,5 6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission? Z /3Zlk ,.~,. o,K. ~:cXe.<~ ~tgcr'/ ~ ~,~d /~, ~ 1~ /~/~~t,~ ~ 1~ ~j~ ~ . AOOITIONALCOMMENTS: ~~ ~~OOd O01C~Z % ~~ /~ ooO~s ~d ~ ' - .'/-' ' .,/~ .'. ,/ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE C~SSIFIED AS PUBLIC. F~s~B~O~cOM~.~PL 6 ~0~ Curriculum Vitae MARY DIERICH, RN, MSN, C-NP, CURN 2720 Carver Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55119 (651)-731-8083 EDUCATION University of Minnesota, School of Nursing Minneapolis, Minnesota 9~9O-6~93 Graduated with Master of Science Degree in Nursing Completed course work for Gerontological Nurse Practitioner Plan B Project: Development of a teaching tape for upper endoscopy and subsequent exploratory study evaluating the effectiveness in patient teaching and cost containment. 9/76-12180 Graduated with Bachelor of Science Degree in Nursing College of St. Catherine St. Paul, Minnesota 9/75-6/76 Undergraduate study I also have extensive course work in Psychology, Adult Developmental Psychology, Chemistry and Biology. I have completed course work to meet the educational requirements in the following specialty areas: critical care nursing, gastrointestinal nursing, urological nursing, urodynamic testing and biofeedback therapy. PRESENT EMPLOYMENT University of Minnesota Physicians Urologic Surgery Department Box 394, 420 Delaware Street SE Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 7/97-present Gerontological Nurse Practitioner/Clinical Nurse Specialist In addition to managing the Urology Department's caseload of interstitial cystitis, multiple sclerosis, pelvic pain and benign prostatatitis patients, I manage and provide services for the Center for Continence and Pelvic Dysfunction. I also am the research coordinator for several large studies. RELATED EXPERIENCE Clinical Networks, Inc./Urofitness Center Southdale Medical Center 6545 France Avenue South Suite 478 Edina, MN 55435 9/95 to 7/97 Gerontological Nurse Practitioner/Clinical Nurse Specialist/Clinic Manager In September, 1995, Clinical Networks, Inc. bought the Urofitness Center from Empi, Inc. At that time, I became Director of Clinical Services at the Urofitness Center. In addition to my usual clinical practice, I was accountable for asset management, record keeping, billing and collections, marketing and clinic promotion, business development plans. I also developed curricula and taught classes for both professionals and the public, as well as, designed protocols for treatment of clients. EMPI, Inc. 5255 East River Road Minneapolis, MN 55421 4/94 to 9/95 Gerontological Nurse Practitioner Until July 1994, my duties included planning and setting up the Urofitness Center, selling this concept to the medical community, devising the treatment protocols for the alpha site and outcome measures for these protocols. I obtained coverage for procedures previously not covered by insurance and worked with the three HMO plans in the Twin Cities community to obtain contracts for coverage of both the services and the equipment used in the conservative treatment of incontinence. I also did direct patient care, conservatively treating and managing incontinence at the clinic and remote sites. I was responsible for setting up the teaching programs for the public, served as an national expert resource for managing incontinence for Empi and served as a clinical preceptor for both physicians and nurses. I was responsible for the daily management of the clinic. HealthEast Corporation 1700 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 9/93 to 4194 Gerontological Nurse Practitioner Clinical Nurse Specialist in Gl~GU My duties included initial development and supervision of the urodynamics laboratory, monitoring of the quality of care given by my colleagues, implementing and monitoring of the cost containment measures, direct patient care of study patients, urodynamics patients and biofeedback patients, development of outreach programs internally and to the community, coordination of the Medtronic Pelvic Pain Study and the MDT-103 Study, coordination of the Empi Innova Study and training of staff in the above procedures. 6/92-9/93 Project Specialist My duties included development of teaching tools, charting tools, and brochures for the Continence Center, establishment of the Urodynamics Laboratory, training of the urodynamics staff, designing a feasibility study for use of disposable forceps, writing procedures for infection control, analyzing literature for colon cancer testing, wound care, and post-op care for gastroscopy tubes, and doing a retrospective chart review on skin care. 11/90-9/93 Staff Nurse-Gl Laboratory Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC) Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation 801 Park Avenue Minneapolis, MN 8/90-9/93 Research Coordinator My duties included establishment of the ...tudy at this site, monitoring care, direct patient care, and coordination of information flow between the sponsoring site, HCMC, and departments within HCMC for the multi- center study of ORG 10172 used for treatment of acute stroke. Golden Oaks Nursing Home 1025 9th Ave South South St. Paul, MN 55075 5/89-7/90 Director of Nursing 5/86-5/89 Patient Care Coordinator 9 St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center 640 Jackson Street St. Paul, MN 55101 4/84-5/89 Charge Nurse for Evening Shift/Staff Nurse, Coronary Care Unit 8/81-4/84 Charge Nurse for Evening Shift/Staff Nurse, General Medicine Unit 2/81-8/81 Staff Nurse, General Medicine/Oncology PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION Minnesota License Number: R 094653 3 Expiration Date: 3/31/01 Public Health Nurse Registration Certificate Number 10308 ANA Certification Number: 212721-23 for Gerontological Nurse Practitioner American Board of Urologic Allied Health Professionals certified Expiration Date: 6/30/01 PROFESSIONAL INVOLVEMENT Active member of the following professional groups: Society of Urological Nurses and Associates (SUNA) Upper Midwest Chapter of the Society of Urologic Nurses & Associates Served on the following committees or had membership in: SUNA Long Range Planning Committee SUNA Patient and Community Education Committee Sigma Theta Tau, Zeta Chapter Past President of the Upper Midwest Chapter of SUNA-1999-2000 I Will Manage" Local Program Director Third District Nurse Practitioner Association Ambulatory Care Council, University of Minnesota Clinics, 1998-present Long Range Planning Committee SUNA, 1998 Chairperson for the Patient/Community Education Committee for SUNA-1997-1999 President of the Upper Midwest Chapter SUNA-1997-1998 President-elect of the Upper Midwest Chapter SUN^-1998-1997 MNA's Creativity in Nursing Group Skin Care Committee, HealthEast PEG Feeding Task Force, HealthEast Visioning Task Force, HealthEast Gl Subcommittee, HealthEast Infection Control, Golden Oaks Pharmacy Review, Golden Oaks incident Review, Golden Oaks Utilization Review, Golden Oaks Quality Assurance Committee, CCU, Ramsey Quality Circle, 7 West, Ramsey Documentation Group, 7 West, Ramsey Nursing College Board, University of MN, School of Nursing Grievance Committee Board Member, University of Minnesota Course Planning Committee, University of Minnesota l0 ACADEMIC AWARDS 4/97 Arthur T. Evans Lectureship Award 5/92 4192 12/91 2/92 9/76 9/75 5/73 Installed in Sigma Theta Tau Named to National Dean's List Awarded Florence Julian Scholarship Awarded School of Nursing Grant Awarded Standard Oil Company Scholarship Awarded 4 year renewable scholarship to attend College of St. Catherine Named as National Honor Society Member COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 3/00 Delegate to the State and 4~ District Democratic Convention 3~00 Clinical preceptor for med students in gynecology rotation 3~00 Interviewed for Bottom Line Health for article titled "Easy Treatments for Incontinence" 3~00 Appeared on "Health Talk and You", a ½ hour panel format on urology-aired on channels 2 and 17 and local cable programming 2~00 Presented lecture to Family Practice NP students on Management of Bladder Dysfunction in the Community Setting 11/99 to present -Consultant to Mentor, Inc. 11199 Presented "Pelvic Dysfunction Through The Lifespan" to the Mentor, Inc. Marketing Department 10/99 Presented "An Update on the Treatment of Urinary Continence Pelvic Prolapse" to the St. Anthony Block Nurses 10199 Exhibited at the Como Block Nursing Senior Health Fair 6~99 Habitat for Humanity volunteer-North St. Paul house 6~99 Presented "Urinary Continence Training" to the 27th Annual Conference for Nurse Practitioner's in Women's Health, Lake Geneva, Wisconsin 5~99-9~99 Assisted with the development of treatment protocols for the Fairview System Physical Therapy Department for urinary incontinence and pelvic pain 4~99 Presented "Treating Urinary Incontinence in the Primary Care Setting" to family practice nurse practitioner students, U of MN 4~99 Presented "Fitting and Using Pessaries" to the medical staff of the Minneapolis VA Hospital 3~99 Presented "The Use of Pessaries in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Prolapse" to the Upper Midwest Chapter of SUNA 2199 Presented "Options for the Overactive Bladder" to the Oxboro Clinic Nurses 2~99 Presented "Options for the Overactive Bladder" to Fairview Ridges Clinic Nurses 1/99 Presented "Urodynamics" to Medimicus, Inc. Marketing Department, Minneapolis 1/99 Presented "Urinary Continence Training" to the Western Wisconsin Advanced Practice Nurses Association, Eau Claire Wisconsin area nurse practitioners 11/98 "The Treatment and Diagnosis of Chronic Pelvic Pain", presented to the Fairview system physical therapists Community Involvement (continued): 10/98 to present-Basketball coach, Transfiguration School 7th and 8th grade girls "A" squad 10/98 Lecture on chronic incontinence management, Prairie Adult Care 10/98 to present Consulting editorial review for Micromedix 6/98 to present Clinical consultant on biofeedback and electrical stimulation for Empi, Inc. 6/98 "Urinary Incontinence-A Challenge for Many Women", presented at Women to Women: Coping With Women's Health Issues sponsored by Minnesota West Community and Technical College 5/98 "Treating the Special Needs of the Patient with Multiple Sclerosis" presented at the SUNA National Seminar 4/98 "Managing Continence in the MS Patient" present at the 25th Anniversary Celebration of the MS Achievement Center 3/98 'Working with Complex Patients: Continence Management and Cure" present to the home health nurses of northern Wisconsin 3/98 "Continence for the MS Patient: Myth or Magic" present at the MS Achievement Center 3/98 "Biofeedback" workshop present at the Complementary Care: From Principles to Practice Conference (University of Minnesota) 4/98 to present Consultant for product development for MedAmicus 2/98 "Working with Complicated Patients" present to the Fairview Home Health Nurses 1/98 Presented "Working With Complicated Patients" to the For Women Only physical therapists of the Fairview University Medical Center 9/97 Presented Community Education and Support Groups at the Upper Midwest Chapter/SUNA Fall Conference 9/97 Presented the "Bowel and Bladder Workshop" for the annual national meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers 7/97 Guest lecturer on "Continence for the MS Patient: Myth or Magic" for patients at the MS Achievement Center 6/97 Guest lecturer on incontinence for the MS Center staff at Fairview Riverside Hospital 5/97 Will by featured speaker on "Maintaining Continence Through the Middle Years and Beyond" sponsored by Abbott Northwestern Hospital's Women's Group 5/97 Featured lecturer at day long seminar for nursing directors on "Urinary Incontinence: New Practice Guidelines" sponsored by the SW Community Colleges 4/97 Presented "Developing Community Education and Support Groups" at the National SUNA Annual Seminar 2/97 Featured lecturer for two day long seminars on "A Quality Toileting Program" geared directors of long term care facilities sponsored by the National of Institute of Health and Human Services Community Involvement (continued): 12/96 Was featured co-speaker at 5 two hour seminars presenting incontinence and treatment for the public sponsored by the Urofitness Center t t1§ Featured guest on cable television program produced locally topic: conservative treatment of incontinence 9196 Guest presenter at the Bowel and Bladder work shop for the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers annual national meeting 8/96 Presented 2 two hour inservices for home health aides on urinary incontinence and treatment for the St. Anthony Block Nurse Program 5/96 Ran and presented at a four week "1 Will Manage" class series 5/96 Presented "A Retrospective Review of Outcomes in Treatment of Urinary Incontinence" at National SUNA Seminar, manuscript solicited for Urologic Nursing Journal 4/96 Guest speaker for the Fain/iew Healthy Seniors program 4196 Guest speaker and clinical preceptor for the Abbott Northwestern Hospital ET nursing program 3/96 Guest speaker for senior group at Becketwood Cooperative on incontinence and treatment 2/96 Speaker at the national convention of SUNA on case studies of incontinent individuals 11/95 Regular speaker for the Living at Home Block Nursing Program at local high rises for community education regarding incontinence care and management 10195 Helped script and was in Empi training video for their Innova product 10/95 Organized in conjunction with Fairview Southdale Hospital and Hillcrest Nursing Home and was a featured speaker for the "1 Will Manage Program" offered to incontinent persons in the community 9/95 Provided two hour CEU program for the Living at Home Block Nursing Program about incontinence management and etiology 6/95 Served as clinical preceptor for family practice residents at the University of Minnesota through the Camden Clinic (1995-1997) 4/95 Information booth at the HealthEast Pelvic Floor Disorders Program 4195 Speaker at the "1 Will Manage Program" for community education at Fairview Southdale Hospital 3/95 Guest speaker in 8 hour didactic portion of Abbott-Northwestern Hospital's ET Nurse Training Program on physiology, incontinence and treatments 2/95 Clinical preceptor for the ET program at Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 2/95 Featured speaker at two haft day seminars given by Ramsey Clinics re: physiology, incontinence, frail elderly and catheter management Community Involvement (continued): 1/95 Inservice for the Abbott-Northwestem home health care nurses (Case Management Systems) on management of the frail elderly and incontinence 1/95 Guest speaker in 8 hour didactic portion of Abbott-Northwestern Hospital's ET Nurse Training program on physiology, incontinence and treatments Registrar for the Beaver Lake Girl Scout Council (1995-1997) Guest speaker for Abbott-Northwestern Hospital's Post- Prostatectomy Group re: PPI and Conservative Treatments Guest speaker at Roseville Mid-Life Women's Group re: Menopause and Incontinence Therapies Continue to act as consultant for staff at the MS Center at Fairview Riverside to assist in incontinence management for their patients Guest speaker for graduate class for nurse practitioners at the University of Minnesota Speaker for Incontinence Education class at Greeley Nursing Home Guest speaker at the Prostate Support Group for HealthEast/United Hospitals Speaker at "1 Will Manage" Program for HealthEast Guest on local talk show regarding incontinence (15 minute slot) Moderator for "Collegial Relationships" at national convention for SGNA 2/93 Speaker at Regional Neurological Nurses Convention 1998-present Basketball Coach "A" Squad, Transfiguration Grade School 1991 Classroom Assistant, Dayton's Bluff ECFE 1989 to present-Active choir member of Transfiguration Parish 1989 Continuously active in Girl Scouts-cookie mom, drop site, and troop leader (1989-1997) 1984 Three years as a Ramsey County Community Gardening Board Member 1981 Membership in the University of Minnesota Alumni Association 1974 Maintain active membership in American Field Service-as an exchange student to Iran, chapter secretary, regional and local screener 1/95 12/94 12/94 8/94 5/94 5/94 3/94 2/94 11/93 5/93 Publications 7/00 2~00 "Bladder Dysfunction in MS Patient" Chapter proposal accepted for medical textbook titled Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnosis, Medical Management, and Rehabilitation "Overcoming Incontinence, A Straightforward to All of Your Options for Treating This Common Problem" book published co-author Felecia Froe, MD 14 Publications (con't) : 7/99 Main Author for Incontinence, Pelvic Pain and Bladder Dysfunction in the Elderly" fact sheets for SUNA 12/98 "A Retrospective Review of Outcomes in One Clinic's Treatment of Urinary Incontinence" published by the Urologic Nursing Journal 10/98 Wrote clinical guidelines for treatment of bladder dysfunction for Pharmacia Upjohn, to be distributed to primary care providers 7/97 to present Editor of Mainstream-newsletter for the Upper Midwest Chapter/SUNA 2/97 Article published on "Changing with the Times" in the Upper Midwest Chapter SUNA newsletter 1/97 Article published on "Help for MS Bladder Problems" in the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers newsletter 11/96 Article published on the "Fall Institute" published in the Upper Midwest SUNA Chapter newsletter 8/94 Wrote four teaching brochures regarding incontinence management and for the public and physicians 7/94 Developed charting forms, questionnaires and patient guidelines for care and follow up for Urofitness Center 7/94 Wrote continuing education course work for incontinence for Rochester Community College for urinary incontinence and wound/skin care management 12193 Wrote script for "Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Colonoscopy" for HealthEast Media Services; video won second place in health topics division in national trade show for teaching videos 7/93 Wrote chapter on impotence and contributed on chapter for urology in Textbook of Basic Nursing published by J.B Lippencott 5/93 Wrote script for pediatric video about surgery for HealthEast Media Services; video won first place overall for teaching videos and first place in health topics division in national trade show 4/93 Developed chart forms and patient flow for HealthEast Continence Center Professional and personal references available upon request. ~1~ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECEI VEu APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM ADDRESS. I-;~~ c.~ ,,~D~Lo ,~~ MA ID[~l)J~0(~d' ~ ziP PHONENO. Work:~[?__-"~I-[SSI Home: Q~;~([-3F-~4.---~L~O DATE 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? l ~ XJ~llr~ I 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Comments: Yes No ~ 3) 4) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check) ~ Community Design Review Board Park & Recreation Commission ~ Housing & Redevelopment Authority ~ Planning Commission ~ Human Relations Commission ~ Police Civil Service Commission Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities? 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: 6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission? ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ~ ~ o,.. ~ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC. FORM$~'BRD&COMM :APL 1 6 10/96 CITY oF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM NAME PHONE NO. Work: DATE ZIP ~/~, ~ ooo 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? .5' ,V'~z¢'.~ 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Comments: Yes No X 3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check) ~' Community Design Review Board ~ Park & Recreation Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority X Planning Commission Human Relations Commission ~' Police Civil Service Commission 4) Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities? 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: · wo,~ ~,~,'<~,,-~, .r^~ ~t-~ orr ,/vl~pl~ ~,ooi. . 6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission? ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASS/F/ED AS PUBLIC. FORMS\6RO&COMM.APL '~ 7 10/96 1) 2) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS OCT 3 0 APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM NAME ~ ~,'~r~ml¥1A I IUN FORM 2000 How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? ~ Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes _ J No Comments: T(-'Q_',,,/~.I ~...~[ ~,lj '~,f'~_~, ~3~) .,'~,~~c~..~,l.~ %,~..,__ 3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in servi~,g,.?l(please check) . Community Design Review Board 'v'. Park & Recreation Commission _ Housing & Redevelopment Authority ~ Planning Commission _ Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 4) Do you have any .specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibi ities? _ ......... ,. . '. 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: 6) WhY Would vou like to sewe on ~is B¢~_d_oLCo~S~[~a~ ......... ~ ............. [ ~t~~ ~ N ~.~_~3~ o~ ~ ~~~~, . ....... .... THE INFORMATION COlQTAiNED IN THIS APPLicA TioN"SiZiALL 'BE-cLAsSiF}ED AS PUBLIC. FORMskBRD&COMM.]ApL 18 10/95