Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/20/20011. Call to Order MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION Monday August 20, 2001, 7:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers 1830 County Road B East 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes a. August 6, 2001 Public Hearings a. 5-8 Club (Beau's) (2289 Minnehaha Avenue) 1. Land Use Plan Amendment (R-1 to BC-M) 2. Zoning Map Change (R-1 to BC-M) 3. Conditional Use Permit (Restaurant) 4. Conditional Use Permit (Expansion of Nonconforming Use) 5. Parking Lot Setback Variance o New Business a. Sobdety High School Conditional Use Permit (2055 White Bear Avenue) 7. Visitor Presentations Commission Presentations a. August 13 Council Meeting: Ms. Dierich b. August 27 Council Meeting: ?? (was to be Mr. Rossbach) c. September 10 Council Meeting: Ms. Fischer Staff Presentations a. Annual Tour Follow-up b. Reschedule September 3 Meeting - Tuesday September 4? 10. Adjoumment MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 2001 CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. I1. ROLL CALL Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Staff Present: Eric Ahlness Mary Dierich Lorraine Fischer Jack Frost Matt Ledvina Paul Mueller Gary Pearson William Rossbach Dale Trippler Present Present Present Absent Present Present Present Absent Present Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Shann Finwall, Associate Planner Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director Recording Secretary: Lisa Kroll III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Pearson moved approval as amended. Commissioner Ahlness seconded. The motion is passed. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ayes -- All Commissioner Pearson moved to approve the August 6, 2001, Planning Commission minutes as amended. Ayes -- All Abstention - Matt Ledvina Paul Mueller Commissioner Trippler seconded. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 -2- V. PUBLIC HEARING 5. a. 5-8 Club Conditional Use Permit (2289 Minnehaha Avenue) Chairperson Fischer stated that items to be considered for this proposal are a land use plan amendment from (R-1) to (BC-(M)), a zoning map change from (R-l) to (BC-(M)), a conditional use permit for a restaurant, conditional use permit for expansion of non-conforming use, and a parking lot setback variance. Ms. Finwall stated that Food Services, Inc., d/b/a 5-8 Club, is proposing to purchase, remodel, and expand Beau's Food and Spirits at 2289 Minnehaha Avenue, located on the northeast corner of Stillwater Road and Minnehaha Avenue. The proposed project includes interior remodeling, expansion of the parking lot, a new covered deck for outdoor dining and exterior painting and improvements. Beau's Food and Spirits was originally opened as Chicone's Bar and Restaurant in the mid 1950's and has been used as a restaurant/bar for approximately the last 46 years. The city adopted their original zoning map in 1965 at which time most of the existing land uses were zoned with a zoning classification to reflect the use of the land and not to create nonconforming uses. The city did, however, zone Chicone's Bar and Restaurant residential even though it had been used as a bar and restaurant for approximately 10 years before 1965. As such, the zoning classification set by the city created a nonconforming use. In staff's opinion the city originally intended to have a commercial zoning for this site to match the restaurant/bar in use at the time. But for some reason the zoning on this property was classified as residential and has not been an issue until this proposal for an expansion. The proposed zoning, therefore, is from residential to the business commercial modified (B-C(M)) zoning district. The business commercial modified district is intended to provide for the orderly transition between more intensive commercial uses and Iow or medium density residential uses. Within this zoning district, restaurants without drive-through facilities are allowed with a conditional use permit. The conditional use permit process will allow the city oversight to ensure there are limited impacts on the surrounding residential properties. The proposed improvements on this site include a 620-square-foot deck located on the northwest side of the building adjacent to Stillwater Road. The deck will be surrounded by a 5-foot high privacy fence with one foot of lattice on top and covered with a decorative awning. The deck requires a conditional use permit as it is expanding off of the existing building's nonconforming setback of 15 feet to residential property as opposed to the required 50-foot setback adjacent to residential property. The new deck also comes within 22 feet of Stillwater Road where a 30-foot setback is required. Beau's Food and Spirits currently has 23 paved parking stalls and overflow gravel parking on the east side of the building. The applicants propose to add an additional 23 parking stalls in the gravel parking area towards the east side of the building. This parking lot will come within 5 feet of the east residential property and 10 feet to the north residential property line. The parking lot will require setback variances. The applicants stress that the parking variance is necessary in order to make the property commercially viable with adequate parking. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 -3- The number of parking stalls after the expansion is still 7 parking stalls less than the city's required for the expanded restaurant. Since the expansion of the parking lot will make the parking situation more conforming with code, no special authorization for this parking is required. Staff agrees with the applicants that the 46 parking stalls proposed would be adequate since the ratio of parking will increase and the proposed deck will only be used seasonally. The applicants show a 6-foot-high cedar privacy fence along the entire length of the east property line. The property owner to the east at 2303 Minnehaha Avenue, Daniel Tacheny, has recently begun the framing construction of a 5-foot-high-stucco fence. This fence is being constructed approximately 5 feet into Mr. Tacheny's property, extending from the rear of his detached garage to his rear property line. This fence was originally proposed by Mr. Tacheny to screen Beau's existing gravel parking area. Upon notice of the 5-8 Club's proposal, the property owner contacted the applicant and inquired about continuing this style of fence along the shared property line. The applicant's point out that Mr. Tacheny's fence is not constructed right on the property line but 5 feet within the adjacent property and will not offer the screening required. For these reasons, the applicants do not wish to extend off of Mr. Tacheny's fence, but rather construct a fence on the property line. Another building addition is a cooler that will need to be bumped out of the existing kitchen approximately 8 feet to the east. The applicants propose to screen this cooler by painting it white to match the building and adding latticework on the sides. The location of the dumpster enclosure was a concern of the neighbors located on both sides. During negotiations it was determined that the best location of the dumpster enclosure would be directly to the east of the new cooler location. Then the new cooler and dumpster enclosure would be fenced in. The existing curb cut on Minnehaha Avenue will remain the same. The grading and drainage plan is designed with a water retention pond to help purify water from the expanded parking area only. The proposed landscaping would include 15 maple trees, 52 shrubs and a perennial garden to the north of the deck. Most of the landscaping will have to be installed in the right of way. Staff has contacted the Minnesota Department of Transportation as well as the county and they are receptive to the idea of placing the landscaping in the R.O.W.S. They however, have some alternative comments regarding trees adjacent the driveway exits. Chairperson Fischer asked members for any questions of the staff report. Commissioner Trippler replied that he is bothered by the request of the 5-foot parking lot setback. Another concern is the location of the deck in relation to the neighbors' homes, and the noise level in the evening. Commissioner Dierich stated that she is thrilled that this is happening for this particular site. However, she is feeling uncomfortable with the setbacks and the deck plan. It puts it practically in the north neighbor's backyard and she wondered if the applicant thought of moving the deck plan to the roof of the structure since it is a flat roofed structure. It would accommodate the need for the amount of parking spaces that is needed and it would get if off the street level. She stood in the parking lot of Beau's that evening at 6:00 p.m. and stated it would be very noisy to eat on the deck at the street level. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 Ms. Finwall stated that the original proposal showed the deck located on the northeast corner of the lot and staff felt that the deck placed on the northwest side of the building was a better alternative. The roof proposal was not looked at or discussed. Commissioner Ledvina stated he had a question regarding the lighting plans. Ms. Finwall replied that the proposed four fence lighting fixtures will be installed directly on the fence posts and will not extend above the fence posts. Commissioner Pearson asked about the cooler being bumped out and if there was still adequate A.D.A. space for access to the ramp from that sidewalk? He stated he could not make the distance off the plans. Ms. Finwall replied that she did not have the answer to that question. She said thank you for pointing that out, we will look into that. Commissioner Mueller stated he is concerned about finishing the fencing rather than the cedar and chain link combined. Is it a cost issue or what is the reason for that? Ms. Finwall stated she was not sure. Maybe the applicant could respond to that question later. Commissioner Trippler asked if the deck poised a nuisance to the neighbors, is there any recourse they have with the noise ordinance and late hours being kept? Ms. Finwall replied that there is a noise ordinance in the city of Maplewood so with that ordinance they will have some recall. The conditional use permit is up for constant review as well. Commissioner Trippler asked if quite hours begin at 10:00 p.m.? Mr. Roberts stated in commercial areas there are no set quite hours. In residential areas quite hours begin at 7:00 p.m. Under the conditional use permit the city could choose to set hours of operation for the outdoor deck as a condition. For example they could state that the deck cannot be used after a certain time. Commissioner Dierich questioned the total occupancy in the building at any one time? Ms. Finwall said she did not have an answer to that, maybe the applicants could answer that for US, Commissioner Dierich replied that the stucco finish on the fence would be a very nice solution for noise levels in the neighborhood. Although it is more expensive, it will be more appealing and should control the decibel of noise more than a cedar and or chain linked fence. Having the fence packed with some insulation in between and covered with stucco, the noise level would be controlled more for those neighbors. She would recommend that the applicant continue the stucco fence and move it all the way up to the street side as well. Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to come forward. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 -5- Jill Skogheim, of Food Services, Inc. d/b/a 5-8 Club introduced herself. Commissioner Mueller asked Ms. Skogheim what type of an eating establishment is the 5-8 Club, is it like a Champp's, a Village Inn, or a family-type establishment? Ms. Skogheim replied, they are a neighborhood tavern grill specializing in a burger called the "Juicy Lucy" sandwiches, walleye dinner, shrimp basket, and ribs. It is generally a family place as well as a place the neighbors have come to gather. Commissioner Mueller asked if it is an establishment that a local subsidized ball team would come and celebrate at after a game at 11:00 p.m. and stay until 1:00 in the morning? Ms. Skogheim stated that they have not had that situation at all in their Minneapolis location. They do have an earlier cutoff on the deck. The hours for the deck are generally used until 10:00 p.m. during the week and until 11:00 p.m. during the weekend. The deck is used less than 3 seasons out of the year. Commissioner Mueller asked Ms. Skogheim about the look of a chain linked fence verses the cedar finish on a fence. Ms. Skogheim replied that a 6-foot high cedar fence is awfully high for all the landscaping they are going to do. The neighbors and the people passing by would not be able to see any of the perennial gardens. It was intended to beautify that area and not in anyway detour from it. Commissioner Ledvina asked what the purpose of the chain-linked fence was? Ms. Skogheim stated that the chain-linked fence is already there right now. We felt that the screening on the deck made for a narrow corridor to plant in as opposed to something that does appear more open. Commissioner Mueller asked the applicant how long the 5-8 Club had been in the Minneapolis location on Cedar Avenue? Ms. Skogheim stated it has been there since 1928 but has been under Food Services, Inc.'s operation since late 1995. Commissioner Pearson asked how long the deck had been in place at the Cedar Avenue location? Ms. Skogheim replied the deck area had been in place for 10 years. Commissioner Mueller asked if Ms. Skogheim had talked with the neighbor about the stucco fence going up? Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 -6- Ms. Skogheim commented that the issue with the stucco fence is that it is not on the 5-8 Club's property and to continue the fence they would continue into the neighbor's hedge and other shrubs. The cedar fence would be more of a barrier in height, the neighbor's fence has been in progress for about 3 or 4 years now and is just a wood frame. What was proposed to the applicants by the neighbor was that the 5-8 Club stucco the neighbor's fence and attach the applicant's cedar fence onto the neighbor's fence. The cost of doing a stucco fence is quite large in comparison to doing a cedar fence, and to stucco the neighbor's fence, they are putting stucco on somebody else's property. If a new neighbor moves in, then we don't really have any control of something they own. Jay Tacheny of Edina Realty came forward to speak. He is representing his parents who live at 2303 Minnehaha Avenue. His parents are the homeowners that have the stucco fence that has been in progress for the past 3 or 4 years. The owners of Beaus had been great neighbors and have been very responsible and we hope the 5-8 Club continues that same attitude with regard to the neighborhood. We are definitely concerned about keeping the fence that is currently there and maybe attaching to our fence or putting a jog in the fence. Maybe we could propose a land trade of the 5 feet so that they could put an extended parking space in for trucks on that back 30 feet. And then the applicant's could continue with a cedar fence. We would like to see that the color of the fence match the exterior of the restaurant. Mr. Tacheny is in real estate and many of his customers have stated chain-linked fences are not very appealing to the eye. Commissioner Mueller asked about having the neighbors get rid of the chain-linked fence and put in a split rail fence. That way you can look through the fence and enjoy the landscaping and it will match the cedar fence much nicer. Mr. Tacheny did state that his father had a heart attack and that is why the fence was not completed. They are now interested in finishing the fence that was started years ago. Commissioner Trippler asked Mr. Tacheny if he understood him correctly that his parents are willing to negotiate with the applicant to give up the 5 feet on the east edge if the applicant will then take over finishing the stucco? Mr. Tacheny replied no not the entire length of the property but on a portion of that they would be interested in talking with regard to giving up 2 or 3 feet perhaps if they could do a full stucco fence. I know they have to come in under budget so they probably can't agree to that. Commissioner Trippler is concerned about the 5-foot setback of the parking lot. Mr. Tacheny stated his family is concerned about the setback as well. Commissioner Trippler stated that if the Tacheny family gave up the 5 feet than they would have a 10-foot setback instead of a 5-foot setback. The homeowner, Mr. Daniel Tacheny, came forward and stated he has no problem with the proposed 5-foot parking lot setback with the 5-8 Club. Commissioner Trippler stated Mr. Tacheny may not have a problem with the setback but if he turned around and sold his property, the new owners may have a problem with the setback and then we have problems. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 -7- Mr. Tacheny stated that the 5-8 Club loses parking on that entire stretch and if they lose that, then they can't open for business. Then we are back to square one. Commissioner Mueller commented that both sides are welcome to discuss the 5 feet on the properties, make a decision, then draw up some new plans and return to another meeting with them at that time. Ms. Finwall stated that Mr. Tacheny's lot is currently a nonconforming width of 66 feet. Allowing an additional 5 feet of width would only increase that nonconformity. Ms. Kathryn Sorenson of 2302 Stillwater Road came forward. Ms. Sorenson is one of the neighbors to the north. Ms. Sorenson said that the issues that she had with Beau's Food and Spirits, Food Services, Inc. have been met. The garbage dumpster location was an issue, the lighting, and the fence. When the parking lot was gravel, cars used to get stuck in the mud and the headlights would shine in on her property. The drainage was also an issue for her and it looks like the proposed plan is addressing that as well. They have been good neighbors and they have met the conditions and the issues that she had. As for the proposed deck, it is far enough away so it really won't bother her. Commissioner Ledvina asked how snow removal is going to be handled on this site, as it doesn't appear that there is much room to pile snow on the site. Ms. Finwall assumed that the snow would be pushed into the area designed for water retention as well as into some of the right of way. They may have to haul away some of the snow to make more room. Commissioner Dierich commented that the overhang is starting to bow, there are wires hanging out and there is some rotten wood in the entry area. Will the exterior improvements be part of the conditional use permit as well? Ms. Finwall said the exterior would be repaired and fixed up, and the building will be a taupe color with burgundy trim. Commissioner Pearson asked if both air conditioning units will be screened or will they be out in the open? Ms. Finwall stated that was a good question and perhaps the planning commission could make that a condition. The Community Design Review Board will review the air conditioning issue also. Commissioner Mueller made a motion to recommend the land use permits for the 5-8 Club. Commissioner Pearson seconded the motion. Commissioner Dierich wanted it noted she felt they should deny 3. b., to ask the applicant to reconsider the location of the deck because that affects so many other areas. I would vote nay because of the deck location. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 -8- Commissioner Trippler felt very strongly about the proposed 5-foot parking lot set back but will probably vote yes for the setback because the neighbor has stated his approval with the setback. We are either going to have the setbacks and enforce them or not have setbacks. Commissioner Ledvina suggested that we add on page 7 number 3. an item d. regarding limiting the hours of the deck until 10:00 on Sunday through Thursday and until 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. Commissioner Mueller and Commissioner Pearson accepted the amendment. Chairperson Fischer asked for a vote on 3.b. bo A conditional use permit for the expansion of a nonconforming structure (deck addition) (50-foot setback toward residential property required, 10- foot setback proposed; and a 30-foot front yard setback required, 22-foot setback proposed); Ayes --All Nay - Mary Dierich Motion carried. Chairperson Fischer asked for votes on 1,2,3, a. A comprehensive land use plan amendment from single-dwelling residential (R-1) to business commercial modified (B-C(M)); A rezoning from single dwelling residential to business commercial modified (B-C(M)); a. A conditional use permit to allow a restaurant within the business commercial (modified) (B-C(M)) zoning district; Motion carried. Ayes -- All VI. NEW BUSINESS . a. Sobriety High School Conditional Use Permit (2055 White Bear Avenue) Mr. Roberts stated Sobriety High School is proposing to open their school for 44 students in the existing ASI office/warehouse building at 2055 White BearAvenue. The site is zoned (M-1). This request requires a conditional use permit to be approved by the city council as our city code requires a conditional use permit for any school in any zoning district. The staff felt the school would meet the findings for an approval of a conditional use permit. The school would be leasing about 6,200 square feet of the existing 82,000 square-foot building. With a staff of seven and 44 students, 120 parking spaces on site, 60 in the front of the building, there is adequate parking on site. Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 -9- Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant representing Sobriety High School to come forward. The applicant addressed himself as Jim Czarniecki as CEO of Sobriety High School. Mr. Czarniecki stated they are delighted to be moving to Maplewood and he hopes that Maplewood finds their presence an asset rather than a liability. They have had very good relationships with the neighbors in Edina and Oakdale. If there are neighbors that are concerned, we have invited them to come to an informational meeting August 28, 2001, to learn more about Sobriety High and meet some of the students. The entire faculty and staff will be there as well to answer questions. Commissioner Mueller asked Mr. Czarniecki how the students get to the program offered at Sobriety High School? Mr. Czarniecki replied that after a student completes a treatment program either for drug or alcohol abuse, the student recognizes after completing treatment that they need a safe and secure place to finish their academic studies. The 68% who complete the program, go on to higher education, the military, and the balance go to work in the workforce. Commissioner Mueller asked what is the success rate in terms of relapse for the students? Mr. Czarniecki stated that in the last 6 years (which are the years he has very good statistics for) the retention has been about 78%, so relapse in that case would be less than 22%. They do lose some students because they move away and because they academically drop out of school. Commissioner Mueller asked Mr. Czarniecki what kind of a support system does the school have for the students? Mr. Czarniecki said they have a very small student to staff ratio and they have had less than 5% turnover in the staff. The student has the same teachers for 3 or 4 years depending on which grade they begin at Sobriety High. There is a remarkable bonding and relationship that develops between the student and staff. The families of the students are extremely important to the school. The PTA attendance is 60-80%. Community support is voluntary, the board of directors, and the board of trustees are people who work in the community, support the school and help raise funds for the school. Presently about 55% of the school income comes from private sector contributions. Commissioner Trippler commented that he thinks it is wonderful there are alternatives and other opportunities for trouble youth to get an education. When he looked at the concerns that were expressed from the neighborhood, he sensed the neighbors' concern. One of the comments made by a neighbor was "you are putting our families at risk". How does the school know if a student is on drugs or alcohol? Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 -10- Mr. Czarniecki stated that each campus has a program director and a program assistant who are not faculty members but are involved in counseling the students. Everyday one of the academic periods is devoted to peer counseling and is facilitated by either the program director or program assistant and occasionally by both. During that time there is a discussion about how each student is doing in their recovery program. They also require each of the students to have a sponsor either through alcoholics anonymous or narcotics anonymous or some other outside program. That sponsor has to work with the student and the school as well. They do not require a urine analysis of the students. They provide an environment and condition of trust and they build that trust between the staff and the students. The faculty is not trained in chemical dependency, they do have on-the-job-experience that they have gained by working with the program directors so that they are alert to the signs of abuse. The program is one of self- reporting and if the student does not self-report the abuse within 48 hours their peers are required to report it. It has not failed Sobriety High in the 12 years that they have been in business. Commissioner Trippler asked if a student is identified as being on drugs or on alcohol, what happens then? Mr. Czarniecki replied that the student must return to treatment. There are rare cases on a case- by-case basis. If the relapse is explained, it is immediately reported, there is a peer group review, and the staff, faculty and parents review the case. There may be a rare case where a student may be allowed to stay because the reporting was done immediately. Of course the second time the student is expelled from the school. In most cases the first incident of abuse the student is expelled. The students know if they are going to stay at Sobriety High School and receive their diploma, they must remain drug and alcohol free. Commissioner Ahlness stated he noticed in the letter that most of the students do not drive themselves and it is a closed campus, so how does a student get there and are they allowed to leave the building for lunch? Mr. Czarniecki replied that about 2/3 of the students do not drive to school. Some of the senior students do own cars and they may carpool with other students. The remaining students are either dropped off and picked up by the parents, depend on public transportation, or the public school system provides transportation. Under the open enrollment legislation in the State of Minnesota, if the student can make their way to the district 622 border, then the district will transport the student to Sobriety High School. Commissioner Mueller asked how far away the students are coming from? Mr. Czarniecki replied that they are serving eight counties through the two campuses. Commissioner Mueller stated that he and his wife have worked for the public school system for years and he wishes the public school system could enforce the same rules for students as they do at Sobriety High. In regards to one of the comments made by neighbors in the survey"you are putting our families at risk" he himself would rather have kids that have recognized the problem and are doing something about it than kids who haven't recognized the problem and aren't doing anything about it. In other words he would feel safer with Sobriety High School in his backyard then a public high school in his backyard. In his opinion the comment made by one of the neighbors reflects that they really haven't thought the whole thing through. Planning Commission -11- Minutes of 08-20-01 Chairperson Fischer closed the public input portion of this item. Commissioner Pearson moved to recommend approval of Sobriety High School's conditional use permit. Commissioner Ledvina seconded the motion. Ayes - All Chairperson Fischer asked staff when this goes to the city council? Mr. Roberts replied September 10, 2001, and he will send out an updated report. VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. VIII. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS a. August 13, 2001, Mary Dierich represented the City Council meeting. She stated that they looked at the Schroeder Milkeconomic district. She was pleased they were adding 30 jobs at $15 an hour and possible thinking about going national. This was a proposal to do some tax increment financing, and it sounds like the city council was pleased with that and is going to figure out a way to do that. The council asked about having a consultant for the Bush Avenue construction project. The issue with that was there were not enough staff for the city to be able to do the work as quickly and as well as they would like to. There is a push from the neighborhood to get this done. It was approved to have a $10,000 budget for a consultant to do survey work and do consulting and have this finished this year. Garbage Hauling in North St. Paul went with one garbage hauler contract after doing a study on it. It was discussed to see if Maplewood should do a study as well to see if we should follow the same route North St. Paul did or not. Also a part time officer was hired to patrol Joy Park. That person did such a good job they hired that person and now they have two people to split one full time position. They are now able to outwit the people causing the problems in Joy Park by varying their hours. August 27, 2001, the City Council meeting will be represented by Eric Ahlness, who will replace Mr. Rossbach. Alamo Car Rental conditional use permit, the Farm Zone Code Amendment first reading, and the first reading of the Rezoning Code Amendment will be discussed at the next planning commission meeting. c. September 10, 2001, the City Council meeting will be represented by Ms. Fischer. Sobriety High will be discussed at that meeting. IX. STAFF PRESENTATIONS Planning Commission Minutes of 08-20-01 -12- a. Annual Tour Follow-up: Because two of the members were not present, they decided to table the tour follow-up until all members are present. bo Reschedule September 3, 2001, meeting to Tuesday, September 4, 2001. Commissioner Trippler stated he would not be available that week. Commissioner Mueller will be late to the meeting. X. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:43 p.m.