The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10/23/2007 AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers - Maplewood City Hall 1830 County Road BEast 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes: October 9, 2007 5. Unfinished Business: None Scheduled 6. Design Review:. Fragment Containment Structure - Police Department Shooting Range (2621 Linwood Avenue) 7. Visitor Presentations: 8. Board Presentations: 9. Staff Presentations: 10. Adjourn DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD BEAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2007 (ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION INVITED) I. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Olson called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Board member John Demko Vice-Chairperson Matt Ledvina Chairperson Linda Olson Board member Ananth Shankar Board member Matt Wise Present Present Present Absent Present Staff Present: Shann Finwall, Planner Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director Ginny Gaynor, Naturalist Alan Kantrud, City Attorney Environmental and Natural Resources Board Members: Chair Jim Beardsley III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Board member Ledvina moved to approve the agenda as amended, adding item a.-Clear Channel (City Attorney Alan Kantrud) under IX. Staff Presentations. Board member Olson seconded. Ayes - all The motion passed. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of the CDRB minutes for September 13, 2007. Ms. Finwall noted a correction needed to agenda item 6. a.-The Shores, adding a condition of approval requiring the removal and maintenance of buckthorn, as discussed at the meeting. Board member Wise questioned whether the developer would be allowed by the city to remove buckthorn around and in the ponding area. Ms. Finwall responded that the city would allow removal of a noxious weed such as buckthorn within the wetland buffer. City naturalist Ginny Gaynor explained that buckthorn is classified by the state as a noxious weed, but does not legally require that buckthorn be removed. The city removes buckthorn from city land when possible and encourages property owners to remove buckthorn from their property. Staff fully supports the board's recommendation to require the developer of the Shores to remove and maintain all buckthorn from the property, including around the wetland area. Community Design Review Board Minutes 10-09-07 2 Jim Beardsley of the city environmental and natural resources commission encouraged board members to require property owners to remove buckthorn from their property when possible. Board member Wise moved approval to add on page seven of the minutes of September 13, 2007: Item c. 7) - Removal and maintenance of all buckthorn from the property. Board member Olson seconded Th.e motion passed. Ayes - all Board member Wise moved approval of the amended minutes of September 13, 2007, adding on page seven to agenda item 6. a. - The Shore: Item c. 7) - Removal of all buckthorn from applicant's property. Board member Demko seconded. Ayes - Olson, Demko, Wise Abstention - Ledvina The motion passed. V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VI. DESIGN REVIEW a. Gladstone Streetscaping - Presentation by Thomas Harrington, landscape architect with Kimley-Horn and Associates, on the proposed concepts for streetscaping in the Gladstone Redevelopment Area Public Works Director Ahl reported on the project plan and timeline. Thomas Harrington of Kimley-Horn & Associates presented the details for the Phase I streetscaping improvements and projected timelines. Some of the topics Mr. Harrington discussed were sidewalks, decorative lighting options, plantings and materials, and irrigation. Board member Wise asked whether utilities would be buried. Director Ahl responded that staff will recommend that utilities be buried, but this will be an added cost. Mr. Wise also commented that ground level solar lighting in the trail areas might be considered. Board member Ledvina asked if the proposed trails would be linked with the Phalen trails. Mr. Harrington explained which trails could be linked. Board member Wise suggested plantings be chosen for the roundabout which would show flowering throughout the seasons. Environmental and Natural Resources (ENR) Commission Chair Jim Beardsley questioned whether porous pavement and solar powered lighting have been considered. Community Design Review Board Minutes 10-09-07 3 Mr. Harrington responded that both are being considered at this time, but porous pavement is generally more expensive and harder to maintain. ENR Chair Beardsley also commented on appropriate kinds of trees to be planted. Chair Olson suggested installing low maintenance pavements and crosswalks, lighting similar to the Legacy Village project with a historic perspective, and that recycled plastic or resin materials might be used for the benches rather than using wood. Mr. Ahl explained the streetscaping options would be presented to the planning, parks, and historical commission on October 16, and will then be brought to the city council for final review. Phase I streetscaping improvements in Gladstone will be implemented spring 2008. Since the applicant for item 6. b. was not yet present at the meeting, the board moved on to consider item IX Staff Presentations. IX. STAFF PRESENTATIONS a. City Attorney Alan Kantrud-Clear Channel City attorney Alan Kantrud discussed a city council referral to the board regarding a modification to the city sign ordinance. Mr. Kantrud, on behalf of the city council, asked the board to review the data and report to the council any advice or information for their consideration regarding: (1) the ordinance change striking prohibited sign language, (2) the proposed ordinance regulating dynamic signs within the city, and (3) the settlement agreement. The board discussed the issues concerning the proposed changes to the sign ordinance and the settlement agreement proposal. Chair Olson recommend that a conditional use permit be issued for the existing sign on 1-494 operated by Clear Channel, that a settlement agreement of $100,000 in cash for the construction of this sign in violation of existing codes be presented to the city, and that the board work with the city council regarding prohibited and dynamic sign language changes. Board member Ledvina seconded the motion for discussion, but said he was uncomfortable with naming a settlement amount in the motion. Board member Ledvina withdrew his motion second; the motion died for lack of a second. Board member Ledvina recommended the board work with the planning commission and city council to draft prohibited and dynamic sign language concurrently at a future meeting. Mr. Ledvina further recommended any settlement the city may make with Clear Channel should not involve the erection of more dynamic signs. Board member Ledvina seconded Ayes - Wise, Ledvina, Demko Nay - Olson The motion passed. Chair Olson stated the reason she voted against the motion was due to the fact she would prefer language in the recommendation regarding the amount of the settlement. Community Design Review Board Minutes 10-09-07 4 Continuation of Design Review items. VI. DESIGN REVIEW b. Concept Review - English Street Manufactured Home Site Redevelopment in the Gladstone Neighborhood (1880 English Street) Planner Shann Finwall presented the staff report on this proposal. Cal Seegar of Crossroads Development explained the project. The only way they think this development would be cost effective is to ensure a higher density development. That is why they are proposing the 38 units. The board discussed the proposal and agreed that the project has a very tight fit to the property (I.e., very little green space). They suggested having a greater setback to allow for tree plantings. They also discussed that the project would be more marketable if the developer installed functioning balconies, rather than walk outs. The board stated that since this is proposed as an active senior development, more parking stalls would probably be needed. In addition, they felt roof dormers and other building details should be implemented into the project. VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS No visitors present. VIII. BOARD PRESENTATIONS No board presentations. X. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:36 p.m. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PROJECT: LOCATION: DATE: City Manager Ken Roberts, Planner Design Review Fragment Containment Structure - Police Department Shooting Range 2621 Linwood Avenue October 12, 2007 INTRODUCTION Mr. John Linssen, representing the Saint Paul Police Department, is asking for city approval to construct a new fragment containment structure at the police department shooting range on Linwood Avenue. Refer to the applicant's statement on page four and the maps and the project plans on pages five through 12. The applicant is proposing to build this structure over one of the existing shooting ranges within their facility. The applicants have designed the new structure to help contain fragments of bullets and other materials created by practice shooting by the officers. As the officers shoot their weapons into targets, small bits of material get airborne and now occasionally leave the site. BACKGROUND In December 1989, the city approved the plans dated November 21, 1989, for the baffling system that is currently on the site. DISCUSSION Design The structure, as proposed, would be a roof over the front of the shooting range and over the dirt berm at the north end of the range. It would measure 112 feet in width and 38 feet deep (front to back). The project plans show the new roof supported on a series of concrete columns and footings. The structure and roof materials include wood beams, wood studs and rafters and corregated galvanized metal roofing. The elevations of the proposed covering are somewhat plain and simple. However, the existing vegetation around the site and the location of the structure will hide it from view from the street and from surrounding properties. In addition, the applicants intend this structure to serve as a practical and functional addition to their facility, so durability and functionality are most important while architectural details and materials are not a high priority with its design and construction. Landscaping The project plans show the existing trees and landscaping around the shooting range remaining as is with this proposal. Lighting The applicants are not proposing any additional lighting with this project. OTHER COMMENTS Police Department: Lieutenant Michael Shortreed of the Maplewood Police Department had no comments or suggestions for this proposal. David Fisher, the Maplewood Building Official, reviewed the proposed plans and noted that the project must meet all 2006 IBC (International Building Code) and all current state building code standards. Engineering: The city's engineering department reviewed this proposal for utility and grading/drainage issues. They noted that the proposed plan does not change the impervious area on the site and there are no pressing issues with the proposal. RECOMMENDATION Approve the plans dated October 3, 2007, for the new fragment containment structure at the Saint Paul Police Department Shooting Range at 2621 Linwood Avenue. This approval is subject to the applicant or the contractor meeting the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Before the city issues a grading or building permit, the applicant must submit to staff for approval the following items: a. If necessary, a grading/drainage/utility plan that meets all city engineering department requirements. b. Any plan revisions or information requested by the city building official. 3. The applicant or contractor shall restore or replace any disturbed turf areas and landscaping before using the new structure. 4. All work shall follow the approved plans. Maplewood city staff may approve minor changes. 2 REFERENCE SURROUNDING LAND USES North: South: East: West: Ponds Of Battle Creek Golf Course Houses across Linwood Avenue Ponds of Battle Creek Golf Course Shooting Range Property and houses PLANNING Land Use Plan Designation: G (government) Zoning: F (farm residence) Criteria for Approval Section 2-290 of the city code requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Application Date The city received the complete application and plans for this proposal on October 3, 2007. State law requires the city to take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a development proposal. As such, city action is required on this proposal by December 1, 2007, unless the applicant agrees to a time extension or unless the city extends the review time. p: sec12-28\Police Shooting Range - 2007 Attachments 1. Applicant's Statement dated October 5, 2007 2. Location Map 3. Area Map 4. Aerial Photo 5. Aerial Photo (Enlarged) 6. Site Plan 7. Project Plans 8. Cross Section 9. Construction Elevation 10. Plans dated October 3, 2007 (separate attachments) 3 10/05/2007 10:41 5512555575 5T PAUL POLICE DEPT PAGE 02/02 Attachment 1 DEPARTMENT OF POLlCE John M. Hanington, Chief of Police CITY OF SAINT PAUL Christophel' 13. CQleman, Mayor 367 GroveSlreet St. Paul, Minne~'Qla 551QJ Tel,p,Qne, 651-19Hlll l~a.c.simik; 6SI~~66~57lJ October 5, 2007 City Of Maplewood Planning Department 1830 COUllty Road BEast Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear S;rs} I have b.<lll asked to submit a letter of explanation ofthe proposed building project at our outdoor range facility located at 2621 Lillwood Ave ill Maplewood. lhe St Paul Police Range has beeu in operation at this location for well aver 40 years. WtV afl;i vUIIuniued to ensux.w.g .safety to the community and our QfficeAa. This facility is essential to the safety and training of not only the St Paul Police Departtnent, but also the Maplewood Police Department and many others. . lhe proposed building project is one of the safety measures we would like to implement. We discovered that when bullet. were impacting the berm as it i. de.igned that old projectiles .till in the berm could be struck cansing them to becoroe airborne. This is a natural occurrence and is commonly referred to as the drop out zone. While these smaUpiooes do not have any velocity or propensity to cause serious injury, they are like a rock being thrown up from a passing car and we want to keep them inside of our faoility. Oll our western most range there is no cover directly over fue top of the range. It is possible for a piece to become airborn.e and land on the Ramsey County Golf COU1'8e to our north. There are no homes or yards in that dir."tionjust the golf course. While the likelihood of anyone being struck is small we want to ensure that nothing leaves our range facility. We already have a similar type .afety device implemented on our "enter range that is working just as it was designed and has made our facility safer. We are asking to build a cover over the west rang_ siroil", to a roof It will be "" open roof design with overlapping angles so nothing "ould leave the range facility. We wallt the open design to allow light in and train in realistic COllditiotl$ along with not disrupting the namral flow of water. The cover is designed to be below the lille ofsight so it would 'lOt bo vi.ible outside ofth. tang. facility. We are not removing any existing trees, bushes or other butfers. I do not believe the residents or the golfers will ever notice this project. We feel it is needed to ensure safety and to continue the e~cellent txaming we offer to our dep.artment and others. A side benefit of this project is that it will redirect some of the sound back towaxds to range floor and keep it within our facility. If you have any ,!ueslions please do not hesitate to call me or email me. I can be reached at 651-266-5555 or 1olm.1inssen(aki..stnaul.mn. us. Sincerely, ...... ~'_". --7 ..........-/ ~. ~74.:... /" Sergeant John LioS5en St Paul Police Department lraining Unit 367 Grove St St raul, MN 55101 RECEIVED OCT 0 6 2007 M,-AOA-BEO Employer =~~..............G 4 Attachment 2 Vista Hills Park J o V D , : ~., , , , .rDJ , :Ii.ii ~.. 'f'-. I 1''';U " ' , ' , ' , , " !'"'€h , I , , , , , , , , , , , , , I I, , I , , , , , , , , , , \ , , , , , , , , , , , I I I, I .,....- ...., I -~-----..../ , ' ,I " , , I' I' I' , ' , ' , I II i " " " , ' . , ii " " " \ , " , , , , , , \ \ \ l I' 'I \, \ \ \ " 'I " " \ \ .,....'. \~\ \\A.... ........ \-~\ - ~ l .., ~\ If' I: \ 1}.'" i!J' , .,,' o i~' ~ IJ' " "i :", D 1] ,,_, " , 1 . l. ....~ J / if " " II ..) I , I II II D!>J" t: . " J' " " 'I " " " r:1-__ " tJ ~ '0 \) o \:) ,<) Applewood I : Park ~ ::l OJ C o ~ LOCATION MAP 5 tJ N .....~~/ ~ -~ / ~ ~ /\----/ / /.I' ~ o () GOLF COURSE o=iJ Q ~ o C:==J =~ co ,.- SITE \ ~-~ / -L1NWOCI!.AVE ~ cJtJ ~ ~ cJ 0 ~ ~ oDD '" iij GJQ ~ o ~ o AREA MAP 6 A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , ...." \. I I I , ~--=- -=--=-=-_=J , I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I l I I I , I \ I \ , \ " \ \ \, \ '. \ \ , ~ ::J III Q o ~ [Jo.' ., \ , ~\ \. ,.~ \ \ ':t-~ \ \ ~ ' \ %,1 "~ 1f N Attachment 4 . 7 ~ N AE~AlPHOTO Attachment 5 . 8 1I N AERIAL PHOTO (ENLARGED) Attachment 6. ./ /' "'" " " / 9 11 N SITE PLAN Attachment 7 ! ! i ) i I I l " . ~.. ". ~ / EXISTING 25 YARD PISTOL RANGE , , I I I I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ -+---\--- \ \ -t---\--- 1_--'--- , '" ~SlR'If~~-~1lP5 !'lllMDf" L.!GlITflXT\lllf5 ~~ NEW FRAGMEN STRUCTURE/R " , $ EXISTING CANOPY ROOF STRUCTURE AL1'fRIIATEBo cafTl!OLNEI'l \W~~!LlCAll(Jl -" EXISTING 50 YARD RIFLE RANGE 0SITE PLAN - PROP05ED CAPTURE 9TRlJC'T1JRE ,.~ --.---.---...'.--.-.-----.--.-------------....-- j''''''''''''''''' ATTACHED TO TUBE """MN q:~'~'~'~Dm STUD" . EACI-l fACE 2'XIO'BtOc:KfNG AITACHa> TO TtJ5E """MN 0' STea- COLUMN - BID ALT. A PROT. ~C'\CONCRETE COLUMN _ BID ALT. A PROTECTIVE BL..OCKINt; lW.P4 ~_r4' . . _~~_~/6- 3-67 J 2O'.CONC.. COLUMN SEE 5TRUCT. GREEN "TREATED 2X"'5 )( 12'* (e. _ EACI-l COUlMN) 3) J/2'4'X,' PIleI': BClI..T EMBEDDED 4' . .EACH 2x(, STAGER AD.lACENT BOLTS " VERl1CALLY 10 11 N PROJECT PLANS Attachment 8 u ------~ , M ~, Ul1PSlmn_UI<ilITf\lll\!nS PllOI'I0E061lUlEU.1'VI.--_..1IP5 5111<fA<:EI'llUN1U>UGHTfIXT1.m!'5 ,~Al'l'l/IlVEDIllUi\L I I ,., -. ~ ,~~ :m>2J12lllDC1(lNl;0ff1I.~Cmr OODCAJ'pWlll'~TllEATED2<.4 EDTOIllW1~ I I .r#) /-,.-.( - , .n__-1n ~-L~-~ ._____:::::_::::-._J___________ ~ L:Eq:::___l jm_ .._ ----------------- 1- --------- jmm_ 1 n n::::::::: ::::: 1:: :::: :_: ::::~ u.rn>1MtB,S1RlII;TI/RE _NUlltflAN:;EBENl "-----=-~'------- .In_n_nn_nn__nn. _ I I ._"-~--------- I .- =~_~:L-,-~---- _/,...~__ _~lU..fU....J\l.Ilm_____.__._ 1lEf.1<All-_ / _nn_nn__nn_r ..- -/' / / ~ .'~ ,., , LUMP SUM D> CO'\IER MATJ:RIAUI - lOOlaQ:;OO"N<DitiACHEDTO-ToI'< -- OOTT<lMF,-"","EOI'BEAM.3I4'COX _EL.nlCDIl.-2<.TREAD-BtLERUIl'Cl:IVE.._ ~,~ .~ I , I .'<----1 f- ----------------- un'!il-"A,EXCAVATIalfRMIDAnOllS. _~am;w-5at.smch- , Ul1P!D1A.EIlCAVATlCtl ----~~-~- PIERfWI1II;;A.TI"'.'Dl 5EAt15EESTlllJCT. FTIlISf,lOFIRllWOl.IIE ___________ ________ _j ___ _______._n _ _ _ ___, _ _ ________1____ ._______ -------------------1.--------- -------1----.--------- ----T~a5~------------ B"fl'llUCEN.l.c. , I I '1-- -//1 / -/.J~:~ - I' :;( r-L --1.._, I I L____-'----1 PEl!fORATEDDRAINPI~ I"..RAVEL WAAl'FEDWIFlLTI:RP.....IUCWWAl.L OlITl..eTSPI2'_O'N.I.C.IlTOl'<IiI'R LlR1f'SUI'1E,RETAIIIl<OWilW-MATERIAL5> 'X6ffiE55llRETl<EATWTIMB~LAlDW OIIERLAPPlNGJOlt<<SANDl1EDTOGETIlER WI2' <>AL.VANlZED5TEEL5Plr<e:l.2~'O.C. (m>.) -fT' - l--L.. ~~-,.~,~~, 2lC4BLoCl:;INGATT.oa-Ja>TO TOf'tB<:7n'Gl"l~OFeEAM. "''''(:[l)(PLTWCX>D. --- 0~~SEcnON r=. W~~'.~'~'~' , ~lII.<>:l<rNGllC\.TeDTD ". <::oI.IJtINFn:E....3)~f.". :. l<W1QI;llC\.T9 <\13" (lft;o.c. llO'1'"""a,,,,,,,,,f!<A/IIII!;~ emRIOR~R-ll'ODIatTEA1W1c PI.1*J",""'TT1afEDTO~""lo:llIllEN1 fll<J'Ira...._1<lGlWlE ::ll:l:i1i-- ~J -~ lDlP!U1O,o:Nf1I.MA'IIJIW.5. -- 2dQ1lQ.1WTOllOf.fI.AH:OEOI' IlEN1'WO.c.GO.IIII'Ell:5/ll.'lLT IEAD!iNllo:Nf1l.HISCII.AP ~. LUMP5Ul1C3, CORRUGATEVGALVANllED METALROOflNG l.lH'1PSUMCb 5/&'CDXPl.YWXllJ /0. 3~67 )~~COLUMHISOMETRIC ROOF EDGE (?):v..:.~o BEMII.......TEllNATEB_BlOCKlNG 11 1r N CROSS SECTION Attachment 9. SEAM G\ ~~ 38'-0' @ 7" 6' 7" 6' 7' 10' aU 10'-0" \' COX PLYWOOD PRf55lJRE TREATED "" RAffiRS .' a.F. OF STEEL ~ cc:RRIGATED GALY. M~)ROOfING (t I 114'- 12" a.F. OF STEEL e. /~ TOP OF BEAM ~ ELEV.= 113'-57&" sil<q~ WOLMANIZED PARALLAM PSL N14x30 T.O.8. EL.EV. /;// '"" ~ , " L I-8Qxqq T.O.B. ELEV...1l3'-S\" TOP OF PIER ELEV...1I0' 10" 14x14xt" BRG. e. J wi 4 - '~til A. BOLTS 24" tit' NON-SI-lRINK BASE e. GROUT. 3" CP2. 20' CONe. PIER wi " #8 VERT BARS t #4 TIES (iI 12' D.C. ----.!!2...,...- / " , " ./ / / -:/ ./ ,/./ ij/ "/ ./ / ;:-/ ~ La' / :/ 1I0.if// ./ ~1Iiir-- ); / '777~L , b06.O' ~// - ----107L -'-~.L /' ~ :/' /)/ //.(. / ..-j>/ /)/ /;/ / ./)/ ;- /;/ 26' 0" 105.0' ---L04L ----103L ----102.L -.J9I.L ...--looL _"fI.L ~,L -P.L %.0' 10xIOx\" BRG. If wi 4 - "ill A. BOl $ It" NON-5I-lRINK BASE 1f GROUT. CPI, 16"ill CONe. PIER wi 4 #S VERT BARS BELL TO 24'. (iI BOTT. ./" 2'-Q' ." ELEV.= ; y!lq';h /<: /// " / /// / /j- . / // / // ;/i 2'-3" fOOTING (SEE PLAN) ~- .... ~.L VERIFY DJ5T. TO FIRING LINE ~ ~L.E~~TION (6" 3-67 12 \r N CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION