HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/18/2007
MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesdav, September 18, 2007, 7:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers
1830 County Road BEast
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes
None
5. Public Hearing
None
6. New Business
a. Discussion on Conservation Easements (Ginny Gaynor)
7. Unfinished Business
None
8. Visitor Presentations
9. Commission Presentations
September 10 Council Meeting: Mr. Desai
September 24 Council Meeting Mr. Walton
October 8 Council Meeting: Mr. Trippler
October 22 Council Meeting: ?? (Mr. Boeser or Mr. Martin)
10. Staff Presentations
11. Adjournment
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Greg Copeland, City Manager
Ken Roberts, Planner
Conservation Easements
September 12, 2007
INTRODUCTION
Maplewood has started studying the idea of using conservation easements as a method of
protection for city-owned properties. Specifically, the city is considering implementing conservation
easements for the 14 city-owned Neighborhood Preserves (as identified in the enclosed brochure).
The planning commission should review the idea of implementing conservation easements for
these sites and provide a recommendation to the city council.
BACKGROUND
On August 14, 2007, the city hosted a joint meeting of the planning, the parks and recreation and
the environmental and natural resources commissions. At this meeting, Sarah Strommen of the
Minnesota Land Trust presented the group background information about conservation easements
and Ginny Gaynor of city staff provided an overview of the 14 neighborhood preserves in
Maplewood.
On August 27,2007, the city council directed the city manager to have Ms. Strommen prepare a
work plan and costs for preparing and implementing conservation easements for the 14
Neighborhood Preserves (Phase II of her work). (See Ms. Strommen's attached draft proposal
dated August 27,2007).
On September 24, 2007, city staff is bringing this matter to the city council for their consideration.
DISCUSSION
The planning commission should discuss, consider and provide a recommendation to the city
council on the city's use of conservation easements on some or all of the Neighborhood Preserves
in Maplewood.
Ms. Stommen indicated that the city (and not her) should pick the best protection tool for each site.
The city may find that for protection and long range planning purposes of these sites that one size
or method does not fit all. She noted that there might be sites where conservation easements
would be a great tool for their permanent protection. Ms. Strommen also noted that there might be
sites in Maplewood where the city might want to consider using other tools or methods for long-
term protection. Such other tools might include requiring super majority (4/5) votes, no-net loss
policies, or adding zoning or subdivision techniques or standards requiring open space
preservation to the city code. The city also could add clear and precise definitions and policies to
the city land use and comprehensive plans about the preservation and protection of the
Neighborhood Preserves.
Conservation easements are permanent, site specific and would be prepared with clear directives
and limits. If the city decides that they want permanent protection for a site, than implementing a
conservation easement on that property is the best tool. However, conservation easements have
little flexibility. If the city wants the ability to change a site or if the city is unsure of the long term
plans and uses for a site, then it would not be in the best interests of the city to implement a
conservation easement on that property.
It may be prudent for the city to consider this policy matter and the idea of additional protection
methods for the Neighborhood Preserves during the update of the Comprehensive Plan. This
method would allow for a more complete study of the topic and would integrate it and the possibility
of new city policies or tools into a more comprehensive study. Such a study could include land
uses, city policies and long term planning with review and input from all the boards and
commissions that should occur as part of the Comprehensive Plan update process.
RECOMMENDATION
The planning commission should review the idea of implementing conservation easements for the
Neighborhood Preserve sites and provide a recommendation to the city council.
P:/misc/Conservation Easements (2007)
Attachments:
1. Neighborhood Preserves Brochure
2. Draft Proposal for Phase 2 - Implementation
2
Attachment 2
Open Space Protection Plan
Draft Proposal for Phase 2: Implementation
City of Maplewood
August 27, 2007
Prepared by:
The Minnesota Land Trust
2356 University Avenue West
Suite 240
St. Paul, MN 55114
651-647-9590
2
1. Background and Purpose
The city of Maplewood is a first-ring Twin Cities suburb located near the
convergence of several major interstates and highways to the east of St. Paul.
The City's central location made it a desirable place for development of both
commercial areas and residential neighborhoods. Concerned over the fast
pace of development, Maplewood residents in 1993 approved a $5 million
referendum to acquire and set aside open space.
The acquisition process was overseen by a citizen Open Space Committee.
The Committee inventoried potential sites, completed an assessment process
to prioritize and rank sites, and ultimately selected sites to be acquired. The
result of that effort is seen today in the City's 14 Neighborhood Preserves (see
attached map). Neighborhood Preserves are distinct from City parks, which
are characterized by more active recreational use. The purpose of the
Neighborhood Preserves is:
The Maplewood Neighborhood Preserves were set aside by and for the
citizens of Maplewood to preserve natural resources, scenic areas, and
landscape buffers. They are protected natural areas where people can
enhance their understanding and enjoyment of the natural world through
passive-use activities such as nature study and hiking. (Maplewood
Neighborhood Preserves Statement of Purpose and Policy, 2.26.01)
To that end, the City has developed management or master plans that address
restoration, management, recreation, access, and amenities for most of the
Neighborhood Preserves. Management of Neighborhood Preserves is
coordinated through the City's Public Works Department and Parks and
Nature Center program.
Recently, however, the City began questioning whether and how to address
permanent protection of the Preserves in that planning process.
The goals for this project were to:
. Determine whether conservation easements are a potential tool to
achieve permanent protection of the Neighborhood Preserves.
. Develop a proposal for implementing conservation easements.
3
II. Process
The following outlines the general steps that make up the conservation
easement process.
Task Responsibility
Review/Establish Goals City staff, Commissions, City
. Maintain character of Council with assistance from the
community by provide visual Land Trust
contrast to development
. Provide opportunities for low
impact recreation, outdoor
education, interaction with
nature
. Restore and maintain habitat for
the diversity of the City's plants
and animals
ResourcelData Review Land Trust with assistance from
City staff
GIS Mapping City staff
Prioritization and Selection of City staff, Commissions, City
Sites to be Protected with Council with assistance from the
Conservation Easement Land Trust
ReviewlFinalize Terms City and Land Trust
Legal Review Land Trust attorney and City
. Title review attorney
. Drafting review
Survey work (if necessary) City -
Approvals City and Land Trust
Baseline Reports Land Trust
4
III. Proposed Terms
Each conservation easement completed by the Minnesota Land Trust is
unique. Each is crafted to protect the conservation values of each special
parcel of land as well as meet the goals of each individual landowner and the
Land Trust.
The Minnesota Land Trust accepts only permanent conservation easements.
Once completed, the easement will forever restrict the future use and
development of the land and protect its natural or scenic features for
generations to come. It represents an important commitment by both the
landowner and the Land Trust. The importance and permanence of this
commitment require that the easement document be written with a great deal
of care and detail.
While typically the Minnesota Land Trust works with private landowners, the
Land Trust does hold a number of conservation easements on public land.
Detailed discussions about the goals for protection and future use of each
Neighborhood Preserve will occur during Phase II (Implementation) of this
project, however, the following summarizes the typical components of a
Minnesota Land Trust conservation easement and proposes a starting place for
discussing potential easement terms for Maplewood's neighborhood
preserves.
Land Use Restrictions & Rights Detail
Industrial or commercial use Prohibited.
Agricultural use Prohibited - this includes
cultivation, forestry, livestock
grazing or animal husbandry.
Residential use and development Prohibited.
Structures and improvements All permanent and temporary
buildings, structures, fences, docks
and other improvements must be
specifically addressed to be
allowed. Often these structures
are subject to restrictions on
location and size.
Rely on park master plan where
available. Specifically, will need
to address Nature Center and
Historic Farm facilities.
Utilities Utilities are allowed to serve those
activities permitted by the
easement but otherwise limited.
5
Division of the property Prohibited.
Density Prohibit transfer of development
rights to another prooerty.
Rights of way Access across the property to
develop adjacent land is typically
prohibited.
Mining Prohibited.
Signs Small, unlighted signs for
informational or interpretive
purposes are typically allowed.
Would need to address entry signs
if appropriate.
Roads and trails Locations of new and existing
roads or driveways, if any, must be
addressed.
Unpaved paths or foot trails are
typically allowed without
restriction. Would need to address
where paved trails are approoriate.
Surface alteration Alteration of the natural
topography or surface of the land
is limited as much as possible.
Vegetation and habitat Management of natural vegetation
management to improve its habitat values
always is allowed, though often
subject to an approved
management plan.
Would need to discuss whether
restoration and management
should be required.
Water Alteration of natural water bodies
and wetlands, or actions
detrimental to water quality are
prohibited.
Dumping No trash or other unsightly
material is allowed on the
property.
Vehicles Typically allowed only on
authorized roads or driveways or
in conjunction with otherwise
authorized activities (i.e. habitat
restoration or management).
Focus on prohibiting erosion or
6
other damage from vehicles.
Recreational and educational use Recreational and educational
purposes that do not impact the
conservation values of the land are
allowed.
Additionally, each easement document will include numerous legal provisions
necessary to ensure the long-term viability and enforceability of the easement.
Many of these provisions are governed by state and federal law.
IV. Costs
Costs will be determined based on the number of parcels and the complexity
of specific terms. Elements determining costs are:
. Initial project costs
o Property evaluation-initial site visit
o Project planning, design, negotiation, review and closing
o Transactional costs
. Baseline reports
. Easement stewardship
. Enforcement
7