Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-04-14 City Council Meeting Packet AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, April 14, 2025 City Hall, Council Chambers Meeting No. 07-25 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. March 24, 2025 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes 2. March 24, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Administrative Presentations a. Council Calendar Update 2. Council Presentations 3. Resolution Awarding the 2024 Maplewood Heritage Award to Sandra Dicke 4. Resolution Proclaiming Arbor Day 2025 G. CONSENT AGENDA – Items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and non- controversial and are approved by one motion of the council. If a councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment regarding an item, the vote should be held until the questions or comments are made then the single vote should be taken. If a councilmember objects to an item it should be removed and acted upon as a separate item. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Resolution Directing Adoption of the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan 3. Road Salt Purchase 2025-2026 4. Purchase of Equipment for Buildout of a Jet/Vac Truck (Unit 616) 5. Local Lawful Gambling Permit for Ashland Productions, 2100 White Bear Avenue North 6. Axon Officer Safety Plan Payment 7. Resolution Authorizing Joint Powers Agreement with the Met Council for Mutual Aid and Emergency Assistance with Law Enforcement Services 8. Conditional Use Permit Review, Woodland Hills Church, 1740 Van Dyke Street North 9. Conditional Use Permit Review, Mister Car Wash, 3050 White Bear Avenue North 10. Conditional Use Permit Review, Londin Crossing, 2501 Londin Lane East 11. Conditional Use Permit Review, McCarrons Water Treatment Plant, 1900 Rice Street North 12. Conditional Use Permit Review, Xcel Energy, 1555 Century Avenue North 13. Conditional Use Permit Review, InTech, Inc., 1055 Gervais Avenue East H.PUBLIC HEARINGS–If you are here for a Public Hearing please familiarize yourself with the Rules of Civility printed on the back of the agenda. Sign in with the City Clerk before addressing the council. At the podium please state your name and address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. The Mayor will then direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments. None I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None J. NEW BUSINESS 1. 2025 City Hall Partial Roof Replacement 2. 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12 a. Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Advertising for Bids b. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution, 1300 McKnight Road North 4. Financial Management Plan Proposal from Ehlers 5. Resolution of Support for Community Project Funding Request K. AWARD OF BIDS None L. ADJOURNMENT Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk’s Office at 651.249.2000 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. RULES OF CIVILITY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OUR COMMUNITY Following are rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Speak only for yourself, not for other council members or citizens - unless specifically tasked by your colleagues to speak for the group or for citizens in the form of a petition. Show respect during comments and/or discussions, listen actively and do not interrupt or talk amongst each other. Be respectful of the process, keeping order and decorum. Do not be critical of council members, staff or others in public. Be respectful of each other’s time keeping remarks brief, to the point and non-repetitive. E1 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL MANAGER WORKSHOP 5:00P.M. Monday, March24, 2025 City Hall, Council Chambers A.CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was heldin the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order at5:02 p.m.by Mayor Abrams. B.ROLL CALL Marylee Abrams, MayorPresent Rebecca Cave, CouncilmemberAbsent Kathleen Juenemann, CouncilmemberPresent Chonburi Lee, Councilmember Present Nikki Villavicencio, CouncilmemberPresent C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA CouncilmemberLeemoved toapprove the agenda as submitted. Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann Ayes– All The motion passed. D.UNFINISHED BUSINESS None E.NEW BUSINESS 1.Police Staffing Study Results Public Safety Director Bierdeman and City Manager Sable provided background and directionfor the agenda item discussion. Dr. Matt Bostrom, with Center for Values-Based Initiatives, gave the presentation. Council provided comments and asked questions of Dr. Bostrom. No Action Required. E.ADJOURNMENT Mayor Abramsadjourned the meetingat6:20p.m. March24, 2025 Council Manager Workshop Minutes 1 Council Packet Page Number 1 of 375 E2 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, March 24, 2025 City Hall, Council Chambers Meeting No. 06-25 A.CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambersand was called to order at7:00p.m.byMayor Abrams. Mayor Abrams sharedthe BRT Gold Linecelebrated their grand opening. Councilmember Villavicencio attended the Gold Line opening and added information on itsfeaturesand amenities. B.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C.ROLL CALL Marylee Abrams, MayorPresent Rebecca Cave, CouncilmemberAbsent Kathleen Juenemann, CouncilmemberPresent Chonburi Lee, CouncilmemberPresent Nikki Villavicencio, CouncilmemberPresent D.APPROVAL OF AGENDA The following items were added to council presentations: CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve theagenda as submitted. Seconded by CouncilmemberLeeAyes – All The motion passed. E.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.March10, 2025 City CouncilWorkshop Meeting Minutes CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve the March10, 2025 City Council Workshop MeetingMinutes assubmitted. Seconded by CouncilmemberLee Ayes – All The motion passed. 2.March10, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes March 24, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes 1 Council Packet Page Number 2 of 375 E2 oved to approve the March10, 2025 City Council Meeting CouncilmemberLeem Minutes assubmitted. Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemannAyes – All The motion passed. F.APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS 1.Administrative Presentations a.Council Calendar Update City ManagerSablegave an update to the council calendar and reviewed other topics of concern or interest requested by councilmembers. 2.Council Presentations None G.CONSENT AGENDA – Items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and non- controversial and are approved by one motion of the council.If a councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment regarding an item, the vote should be held until the questions or comments are made then the single vote should be taken. If a councilmember objects to an item it should be removed and acted upon as a separate item. annmoved toapprove agenda items G1-G6. CouncilmemberJuenem Seconded by CouncilmemberLeeAyes – All The motion passed. 1.Approval of Claims CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve the approval of claims. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 117,317.10 Checks # 122801 thru # 122828 dated 3/11/25 $ 8,517.16 Checks # 122829 thru # 122831 dated 3/18/25 $ 498,766.63 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 3/03/25 thru 3/16/25 $ 624,600.89 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL March 24, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes 2 Council Packet Page Number 3 of 375 E2 $ 789,487.59 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 3/14/25 $ 789,487.59 Total Payroll $ 1,414,088.48 GRAND TOTAL Seconded by Councilmember LeeAyes – All The motion passed. 2.2025 Bituminous Material Purchase annmoved to authorize the Street Superintendent to purchase CouncilmemberJuenem bituminous materials in an amount up to $170,000 for the 2025 street maintenance season. Seconded by CouncilmemberLeeAyes – All The motion passed. 3.2025 Street Striping by Ramsey County Public Works annmoved toauthorizeRamsey County Public Works to CouncilmemberJuenem perform pavement striping on city-maintained streets estimated at $30,000. Seconded by CouncilmemberLeeAyes – All The motion passed. 4.2025 Maplewood Open Space Prescribed Burns CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approvetheIndependent Contractor Services Agreement with Red Rock Fire, LLC for the 2025 Maplewood Open Space Prescribed Burns project and direct the Mayor and City Manager to sign the agreement. Minor revisions as approved by the City Attorney, are authorized as needed. Seconded by CouncilmemberLeeAyes – All The motion passed. 5.Ramsey County Cooperative Agreement for County Road D Improvements, City Project 22-28 CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve the cooperative agreement with Ramsey County to construct the County Road D Improvements project, City Project 22-28, and direct the Mayor and City Manager to sign the agreement. As approved by the City Attorney, minor revisions are authorized as needed. March 24, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes 3 Council Packet Page Number 4 of 375 E2 Seconded by CouncilmemberLee Ayes – All The motion passed. 6.LHB Professional Services Agreement for the Century Ponds Park Planning and Design, City Project 24-07 annmoved to authorize the use of LHBfor professional services CouncilmemberJuenem for the Century Ponds Park Planning and Design, City Project 24-07 and to direct the Mayor and the City Manager to sign the professional services agreement. Seconded by Councilmember LeeAyes – All The motion passed. H.PUBLIC HEARINGS – If you are here for a Public Hearing please familiarize yourself with the Rules of Civility printed on the back of the agenda. Sign in with the City Clerk before addressing the council. At the podium please state your name and address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. The Mayor will then direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments. None I.UNFINISHED BUSINESS None J.NEW BUSINESS 1.Gethsemane Park Lease Agreement, City Project 25-07 Assistant City Engineer Jarosch gave the report. CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve the lease agreement with Gethsemane Lutheran Church for using church property for City park purposes and direct the Mayor and City Manager to sign the lease agreement. As approved by the City Attorney, minor revisions are authorized as needed. Seconded by Councilmember Villavicencio Ayes – All The motion passed. 2.Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing for MnDOT TH 5 Improvements, City Project 25-10 Assistant City Engineer Jarosch gave the report. oved to approve the resolution calling for a public hearing at 7:00 CouncilmemberLeem p.m. on April 28, 2025, for MnDOT TH 5 Improvements, City Project 25-10. Resolution 25-03-2390 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING March 24, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes 4 Council Packet Page Number 5 of 375 E2 WHEREAS,the Minnesota Department of Transportation is developing plans for improvements to Trunk Highway 5 between Minnehaha Avenue and Lakewood Drive; and WHEREAS, Municipal Consent is required due to the proposed improvements including a reduction of lanes from four to three lanes, and the acquisition of permanent rights-of-way for the construction of a new trail on the east side of Trunk Highway 5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota: th 1.A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 28 day of April 2025 at 7:00 PM. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required bylaw. Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann Ayes – All The motion passed. 3.Resolution of Support, DNR Grant for Boardwalk Replacement of the Thunder Bay Trail System, City Project 25-11 Assistant City Engineer Jarosch gave the report. CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve the resolution of support for the application for Local Trail Connections Program funding for the replacement of the deteriorated boardwalk on the Thunder Bay Trail system, as modified to 25 years. Resolution 25-03-2391 SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION FOR LOCAL TRAIL CONNECTIONS PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE DETERIORATED BOARDWALK ON THE THUNDER BAY TRAIL SYSTEM WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is soliciting applications for the Local Trail Connections Program to support trail projects statewide; and WHEREAS, the Local Trails Connections Program provides support to projects that accelerate local trail connections to planned and existing state trails and other public facilities, not to create significant new recreation trails; and WHEREAS the City of Maplewood supports the grant application made to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources by the City of Little Canada to replace 253 feet of boardwalk along the Thunder Bay Trail system that connects to both local and regional trail networks; and WHEREAS, the Thunder Bay Trail boardwalk will meet the goals of the Local Trail Connections Program, will be constructed to meet ADA standards, and will be at least 10 feet wide; and March 24, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes 5 Council Packet Page Number 6 of 375 E2 WHEREAS the City of Maplewood is supporting the grant request funding in the amount of $250,000.00 and has secured $58,379.59 in non-state cash matching funds for this project; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood acknowledges that all construction must be complete by June 30, 2027. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota: 1.The City of Maplewood supports the submittal of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Local Trail Connections Program by the City of Little Canada. 2.The applicant has read the Conflict of InterestPolicy contained in the Local Trail Connection Grant Manual and certifies it will report any actual, potential, perceived, or organizational conflicts of interest upon discovery to the state related to the application or grant award. 3.The City of Maplewood assures that the Thunder Bay Trail Boardwalk will be maintained for at least 25 years. Seconded by Councilmember Lee Ayes – All The motion passed. 4.Maplewood Community Center Gym Floor Replacement Finance Director Rueb gave the report. oved to approve the base bid of $164,315 along with an CouncilmemberLeem allowance for concrete corrections in the amount of $10,000, refinishing hallways of $3,235 and upgraded moisture mitigation of $40,000 for a total bid of $217,550 from H2I. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All The motion passed. 5.City Manager AnnualPerformance Evaluation a. Intent to Close Regular Meeting Pursuantto Minnesota Statutes §13D.05, subd. 3(a) b.Summarize Conclusions of the City Manager Performance Evaluation ed to close the meeting and go into closed session to Councilmember Juenemannmov conduct the annual performance evaluation of City Manager Michael Sable, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13D.05, subd. 3(a), Seconded by CouncilmemberLeeAyes – All The motion passed. March 24, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes 6 Council Packet Page Number 7 of 375 E2 Mayor Abrams closed the meeting at 7:24 p.m. Present at the closed session: Mayor Abrams, Councilmember Juenemann, Councilmember Lee, Councilmember Villavicencio,andCity Manager Sable. Mayor Abrams called the meeting back to order at 7:49p.m. Mayor Abrams provided a summary of the evaluation. No action required. K.AWARD OF BIDS None L.ADJOURNMENT Mayor Abramsadjourned the meeting at7:50p.m. March 24, 2025 City Council Meeting Minutes 7 Council Packet Page Number 8 of 375 F1a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO:City Council REPORT FROM: Michael Sable, City Manager PRESENTER:Michael Sable, City Manager AGENDA ITEM: Council Calendar Update Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: This item is informational and intended to provide the Council an indication on the current planning for upcoming agenda items and the Work Session schedule. These are not official announcements of the meetings, but a snapshot look at the upcoming meetings for the City Council to plan their calendars. Recommended Action: No motion needed. This is an informational item. Upcoming Agenda Items and Work Sessions Schedule: April 23: Council/ELT Retreat: 12pm – 5 pm April 28: Workshop: EAB / Tree Update; Metro HRA – Housing Discussions May 12: Workshop: 2026 Budget Kickoff Council Comments: Comments regarding Workshops, Council Meetings or other topics of concern or interest. 1.Transit Discussion 2.Discuss Charitable Gambling Policy Community Events and Notifications: April 19: Egg Hunt at Edgerton Park: 9:30 to 11 am (full) April 19: Rice Larpenteur Spring Clean Up: 9:30 to 11 am May 3: Maplewood Spring Clean Up at Aldrich Arena: 8 am – 1 pm Maplewood Living Schedule: Author Due Date Edition Cave April 17, 2025 May 2025 VillavicencioJune 17, 2025 July 2025 Lee Aug 19, 2025 Sept 2025 Council Packet Page Number 9 of 375 F3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Joe Sheeran, HPC Liaison PRESENTER:Joe Sheeran, HPC Liaison AGENDA ITEM:ResolutionAwardingthe2024MaplewoodHeritageAwardtoSandra Dicke Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The Maplewood Heritage Award recognizes an individual annually who has positively influenced the city’s past or strengthened the preservation of Maplewood history and culture. At its March 2025 meeting, the Heritage Preservation Commission selected Sandra Dicke as the 2024 Maplewood Heritage Award recipient. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the resolution awarding the 2024 Maplewood Heritage Award to Sandra Dicke. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0. Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment Background: Sandra Dicke has made a significant impact on preserving Maplewood History through: o Volunteering more than 25 years with the Maplewood Area Historical Society and serving on its board for a decade. o Facilitating meetings at the Legislature on behalf of Maplewood Area Historical Society to secure more than $250,000 for Bruentrup Heritage Farm renovations. o Launching the Heritage Barn as an events venue, hosting weddings and other gatherings. o Developing the Mysteries of History program at the Wakefield Community Building. Attachments: Resolution Council Packet Page Number 10 of 375 F3, Attachment 1 ResolutionAwardingthe2024MaplewoodHeritageAwardtoSandra Dicke WHEREAS, Sandra Dicke volunteered at the Maplewood Area Historical Society for more than 25 years, including serving a decade on its board of directors; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dicke was instrumental in leveraging more than $250,000 in state funding to renovate the Bruentrup Heritage Farm to maintain its historical integrity; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dicke helped launch and manage the Farm’s events venue operation; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dicke helped develop “Mysteries of Histories” program at the Wakefield Park Community Building; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dicke has been a lifelong Maplewood resident dating back to the time it was known as New Canada Township and raising her family here. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT IS RESOLVED on behalf of the City of Maplewood, that Sandra Dicke is presented the Maplewood Heritage Award, which recognizes an individual who has significantly contributed to preservation of Maplewood history or historic sites through research, preservation, or education and outreach. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on April 14, 2025. Marylee Abrams, Mayor Attest: Andrea Sindt, City Clerk Council Packet Page Number 11 of 375 F4 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Steven Love, Public Works Director Audra Robbins, Parks and Natural Resources Manager PRESENTER:Steven Love, Public Works Director AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Proclaiming Arbor Day 2025 Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: Arbor Day is celebrated worldwide as a day to celebrate trees. Staff recommends that the City Council proclaim May 3, 2025, Arbor Day in Maplewood. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the resolution proclaiming May 3, 2025, as Arbor Day 2025 in Maplewood. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated CommunicationOperational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment Trees are an essential component of the City’s green infrastructure and help mitigate the effects of climate change. This action calls attention to trees and engages the community in celebrating their value. Background: National Arbor Day is the last Friday of April, but each state and community varies the date to coincide with planting times. In Minnesota, the month of May is typically designated Arbor Month. Minnesota communities observing Arbor Day usually schedule celebrations in late April or May. Trees provide numerous benefits to individuals and the community. They reduce storm water run- off and erosion, provide shade, reduce heating and cooling costs, moderate temperature, clean the Council Packet Page Number 12 of 375 F4 air, produce oxygen, provide habitat for wildlife, provide wood and paper products, and create jobs. Trees increase property values and enhance the beauty of our community. An Arbor Day resolution supports the City’s sustainability initiatives and encourages residents to value, plant, and care for trees. A resolution showing City Council support is also one of the requirements for Tree City USA designation. Maplewood has been designated a Tree City each year since 2010 and will continue to reapply annually. Attachments: 1.Resolution Proclaiming Arbor Day 2025 Council Packet Page Number 13 of 375 F4, Attachment 1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. ____ PROCLAIMING ARBOR DAY 2025 WHEREAS, Arbor Day provides an opportunity to celebrate the importance of trees and forests to our economy, culture, history, and future of the state; and WHEREAS, trees are of great value as they provide clean air and water, shade and energy savings, wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, wood products, and jobs, while also capturing and storing carbon from the atmosphere, thereby offsetting greenhouse gas emissions; and WHEREAS, properly planting and caring for a diverse mix of trees makes community forests more resilient by minimizing the impacts of diseases, insects, and other stressors such as climate change and providing long-term community and environmental benefits; and WHEREAS, thoughtfully choosing, planting, and caring for a diverse mix of trees now supports resilient communities into the future. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota designates May 3, 2025, as Arbor Day in the City of Maplewood. th Adopted this 14day of April, 2025. _________________________________ Marylee Abrams, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Andrea Sindt, City Clerk Council Packet Page Number 14 of 375 G1 Council Packet Page Number 15 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 16 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 17 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 18 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 19 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 20 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 21 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 22 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 23 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 24 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 25 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 26 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 27 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 28 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 29 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 30 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 31 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 32 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 33 of 375 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 34 of 375 G2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Ryan Schroeder, Assistant Fire Chief PRESENTER: Ryan Schroeder, Assistant Fire Chief AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Directing Adoption of the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/AgreementProclamation Policy Issue: A hazard mitigation plan is a federally required document under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA). The DMA mandates that all states, counties, and communities maintain an approved mitigation plan to be eligible for components of federal disaster assistance. The City of Maplewood has partnered with Ramsey County in the development of the 2025 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). Adoption of the HMP ensures the city is aligned with regional mitigation strategies and demonstrates a proactive commitment to reducing risks from natural and human-caused hazards. It is designed to comply with all applicable federal and state regulations. The HMP has been rewritten in 2025 and should be considered for adoption. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the resolution directing adoption of the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset Mgmt.Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The HMP provides communities in Ramsey County with a plan to strive for consistency in addressing risks to enhance resilience. Council Packet Page Number 35 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Background The Ramsey County HMP identifies community capabilities, provides an assessment of risks to the county and its communities, and highlights community mitigation strategies that reduce risks posed by a variety of hazards. The plan is updated approximately every five years to keep it current and maintain eligibility for mitigation grant assistance. The HMP serves as a coordinated framework for hazard mitigation planning across the county. It encourages collaboration among cities and stakeholders and ensures local jurisdictions account for emerging hazards, the effects of growth and development, social vulnerability, and recent real-world events. The updated plan assesses and ranks a wide range of natural, technological, and human-caused hazards based on their likelihood of occurrence, potential economic impact, and risks to life and property. Mitigation strategies are developed using input from local and state agencies, public feedback, and recognized national best practices. The plan incorporates natural, human-caused, and technological hazards to develop a holistic understanding of risk. The HMP is a multi-jurisdictional plan that applies to all of Ramsey County. Municipalities separately adopt the HMP as their own, meaning that the entire county will now use a single assessment and planning methodology to better coordinate across jurisdictions. Attachments 1.Resolution 2.Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan Council Packet Page Number 36 of 375 G2, Attachment 1 RESOLUTION DIRECTING ADOPTION OF THE RAMSEY COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota has participated in the hazard mitigation planning process as established under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 WHEREAS, the Act establishes a framework for the development of a multi- jurisdictional County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) WHEREAS, the HMP is designed to comply with all applicable federal and state regulations WHEREAS, the HMP includes a risk assessment including hazards, risk, and a general description of land uses and development trends WHEREAS, the HMP includes a mitigation strategy including goals, objectives, and an action plan identifying specific mitigation projects WHEREAS, the HMP will make the county and participating jurisdictions eligible to receive FEMA hazard mitigation grants WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said HMP is formally adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, Minnesota, that 1.The City of Maplewood supports the hazard mitigation planning effort and wishes to adopt the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan. th Adopted by the Maplewood City Council on this 14 day of April 2025. Council Packet Page Number 37 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2025 Council Packet Page Number 38 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Ramsey County, MN Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2025 Developed by the communities of Ramsey County In consultation with Tidal Basin Government Consulting Cover Photo Credit: Lyndsay Hicken Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan I Council Packet Page Number 39 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... II 1. Introduction and Planning Process ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Plan Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Planning Process ................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Community Profile and Capabilities .......................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Geography and Topography ............................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Population and Demographics ............................................................................................................ 9 2.4 Social Vulnerability ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.5 Economy ............................................................................................................................................ 15 2.6 Community Services and Infrastructure ........................................................................................... 16 2.7 Critical Facilities ................................................................................................................................ 17 2.8 Land Use and Ownership .................................................................................................................. 18 2.9 Climate Change and Trends .............................................................................................................. 19 2.10 Community Capabilities Assessment .............................................................................................. 20 3. Risk Assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1 Risk Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 26 3.2 Hazard Summary ............................................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Assessment Methodology ................................................................................................................. 28 3.4 Hazard Rankings................................................................................................................................29 3.5 Community Hazard Rankings ............................................................................................................ 30 3.6 Dam/Levee Failure ............................................................................................................................ 31 3.7 Drought ............................................................................................................................................. 36 3.8 Floods ................................................................................................................................................ 42 3.9 Geologic Hazards ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.10 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................................... 14 3.11 Summer Weather Hazards .............................................................................................................. 20 3.12 Tornado and Windstorm ................................................................................................................. 29 3.13 Winter Weather Hazards ................................................................................................................ 36 3.14 Human-Caused Hazards .................................................................................................................. 44 Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan II Council Packet Page Number 40 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.15 Infrastructure Failure ...................................................................................................................... 50 4. Hazard Mitigation Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 58 4.1 Plan Goals .......................................................................................................................................... 58 4.2 Strategy Development ...................................................................................................................... 58 4.3 2019 Mitigation Action Reporting ..................................................................................................... 58 4.4 Completed Actions ............................................................................................................................ 59 4.5 Cancelled Actions .............................................................................................................................. 59 4.6 2025 Mitigation Strategy Elements .................................................................................................. 60 4.7 Action Prioritization .......................................................................................................................... 60 4.8 2025 Hazard Mitigation Strategy ...................................................................................................... 61 5. Plan Implementation and Maintenance ............................................................................................... 107 5.1 Plan Implementation ...................................................................................................................... 107 5.2 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan ............................................................................... 108 Appendix A – Additional Emergency Management Actions ......................................................................... 1 Appendix B – Studies and References ........................................................................................................... 1 Appendix C – Sample Adoption .................................................................................................................... 1 Appendix D – Planning Process Documentation ........................................................................................... 1 Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan III Council Packet Page Number 41 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 1.Introduction and Planning Process 1.1 Introduction Hazard mitigation is defined as any action taken before, during, or after a disaster to permanently eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to human life and property. Hazard mitigation is crucial to a comprehensive emergency management program, working alongside preparedness, response and recovery efforts. This plan will help participating jurisdictions lower their risk to natural hazards and enhance their resilience by identifying local policies and actions to reduce losses. The 2025 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update provides a framework to enhance the general well-being, safety and resilience of residents and communities across Ramsey County. This plan considers the impact of natural hazards across the planning area, reviews current levels of capability relevant to hazard mitigation, and identifies a comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy to buy down levels of risk. 1.2 Plan Goals and Objectives The planning process included a review and update of the prior mitigation goals and objectives as a basis for the planning process and selection of appropriate mitigation actions addressing all hazards of concern. Upon consideration, participating jurisdictions identified the follow goals for the plan update: Goal 1. Mitigate impacts to life, property, the economy and the environment from natural, technological and human-caused hazards. Goal 2. Build and support local capacity to create resiliency from natural, technological and human- caused hazards. Goal 3. Build resilience for critical infrastructure and systems against impacts of natural, technological and human-caused hazards. Goal 4. Increase education, outreach and awareness to the whole community to build resiliency. 1.3 Plan Organization The Ramsey County HMP update is organized as follows: Section 1. Introduction and Planning Process. Overview of participants, planning process and information regarding adoption of the HMP by Ramsey County and each participating jurisdiction. Description of the HMP methodology and development process; Local Planning Team (LPT) and stakeholder involvement efforts; and a description of how this HMP will be incorporated into existing programs. Section 2. Profile and Capability Assessment. Overview of Ramsey County, including: (1) physical setting, (2) land use, (3) land use trends, (4) population and demographics, (5) general building stock and (6)critical facilities and lifelines. A summary and description of the existing plans, programs and regulatory mechanisms at all levels of government (federal, state, county, local) that support hazard mitigation within the County. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 Council Packet Page Number 42 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Section 3. Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA). Documentation of the hazard identification and hazard risk ranking process, hazard profiles, vulnerability assessment (estimates of the impact of hazard events on life, safety, health, general building stock, critical facilities, the economy); consequence assessment (consequences Ramsey County and its communities could reasonably expect from an instance of the hazard including impacts on the public; responders; continuity of operations; property, facilities, and infrastructure; environment; economy of the jurisdiction; and public confidence in the jurisdiction’s governance); description of the status of local data; and planned steps to improve local data to support mitigation planning. Section 4. Mitigation Strategy. Information regarding the mitigation goals and objectives in response to priority hazards of concern and the process by which Ramsey County and local mitigation strategies have been developed or updated. Section 5. Plan Maintenance Procedures. System established to continue to monitor, evaluate, maintain, and update the HMP. 1.4 Planning Process 1.4.1 PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS Table 1 shows all jurisdictions that were participants in the plan update. Table 1. Participating Jurisdictions in the 2025 Update Participating Jurisdictions Arden Hills Falcon Heights Gem Lake Lauderdale Little Canada Maplewood Mounds View New BrightonNorth Oaks North Saint Paul Roseville Saint Anthony Saint Paul Shoreview Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear TownshipRamsey County Each participating jurisdiction was asked to do the following: Actively participate in the planning process. Provide an update on the status of mitigation actions identified for that community in the 2019 plan. Provide an update on community capabilities. Identify at least one new or continuing hazard mitigation action in the updated 2025 hazard mitigation strategy. Provide input throughout the process on plan elements. Support public participation in the process. 1.4.2 LOCAL PLANNING TEAM To assist in the development of the plan update and provide guidance and community input on the process, an LPT was convened to serve as community representatives in the process. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 2 Council Packet Page Number 43 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Table 2. Local Planning Team Title Last Name First Name Jurisdiction Mayor Artig-SwomleyGretchenGem Lake Assistant to the City Bownik Jim Administrator Lauderdale Fire Chief Brosnahan David Roseville City Administrator ButkowskiHeatherLauderdale Town Administrator Christopherson Pat White Bear Township Fire Chief Diaz Izzy St. Anthony Director of Emergency Management and Homeland Freed Judd Security Ramsey County Deputy Director of Public Safety Hamdorf Trevor New Brighton Fire Chief Hearden Chris Vadnais Heights Acting City Clerk Lawrence Melissa Gem Lake City Council Linder Jim Gem Lake City Administrator Linehan JackFalcon Heights EM Planning Coordinator Lovas Mike St. Paul Emergency Management Mayer Bryan Coordinator Ramsey County Fire Chief Mallinger Jason North St. Paul Office Assistant – Fire Division Minwegen Jen New Brighton Assistant Fire Chief Montain Matt Mounds View Public Works Lead PeltierPaul White Bear Township Fire Chief Peterson Greg White Bear Lake Assistant Fire Chief Richter Mike Vadnais Heights Assistant Fire Chief – Lake Sather MattJohanna Fire Arden Hills, North Oaks & Shoreview Assistant Fire Chief SchroederRyanMaplewood Emergency Management Sieben Terry Coordinator St. Paul Fire Chief Smiley DonLittle Canada Chief of Police Zender Ben Mounds View 1.4.3 PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH Public engagement is a key component to the HMP’s success. Public outreach was accomplished both at the beginning and the end of the process. An electronic survey regarding hazard mitigation was released on June 24, 2024, utilizing the web-based Microsoft Forms survey tool. The survey was advertised by the County and jurisdictions within. A full accounting of advertising for the public survey is included in the Planning Process Appendix to this plan. Efforts were made by Ramsey County and participating jurisdictions to focus on including traditionally underserved populations (TUP) into the planning effort. Partnerships between the County, the Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 3 Council Packet Page Number 44 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 communities, and TUPs were explored. Ramsey County is currently building in-roads with TUPs to ensure that they can be a part of future planning processes. The plan was reviewed by a subject matter expert in TUPs to identify ways in which the plan could be developed in a more inclusive manner, resulting in substantive changes to the plan. th After completing the draft plan, it was opened for public review from December 9, 2024, through th December 20, 2024. The plan was posted for online access, and acomment toolwas developed to collect comments. Comments received were reviewed and integrated as appropriate. Stakeholders are the individuals, agencies, and jurisdictions that have a vested interest in the recommendations of the HMP, including all planning partners. The planning process prioritized extensive representation from regional, county and local areas. Stakeholders were given a chance to review the plan during the plan review process. Jurisdictional representatives for each participating jurisdiction were also asked to serve as brokers to stakeholders within their own communities when providing plan inputs. Table 3. Stakeholders Stakeholder Method Anoka County Emergency Management Plan review via direct email Washington County Emergency Management Plan review via direct email Dakota County Emergency Management Plan review via direct email Hennepin County Emergency Management Plan review via direct email 1.4.4 PLANNING MEETINGS Three large-group LPT planning meetings were held to support the planning process. All meetings were held virtually, via Microsoft Teams. Meeting #1 focused on introducing the planning process to the LPT and discussing reporting for community capabilities and progress on 2019 HMP mitigation actions. Meeting #2 focused on the initial results of the HIRA process. Meeting #3 focused on community hazard mitigation strategy development. Additionally, a series of informal mitigation strategy update support meetings were held virtually with communities upon request to discuss potential ideas for hazard mitigation actions. The following jurisdictions held additional community-specific meetings: North St. Paul September 10, 2024 Vadnais Heights September 10, 2024 Falcon Heights September 12, 2024 Ramsey County September 12, 2024 1.4.5 COMMUNITY CAPABILITIES Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 4 Council Packet Page Number 45 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Participating jurisdictions were provided the opportunity to identify community capabilities identified in the previous plan; these capabilities were used as a baseline to identify areas upon which to build for the hazard mitigation strategy. Communities reported on capabilities in the following target areas: Planning and Regulatory Administrative and Technical Financial Education and Outreach The outcome of the capability assessment surveys is summarized in Section 2. 1.4.6 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT A risk assessment is a calculation of the threat, vulnerability, and consequence of hazards that impact the participating jurisdictions in the planning area. While hazard mitigation lends itself to natural hazards, Ramsey County included human-caused and technological hazards to develop a more holistic understanding of risk. The following hazards were identified and assessed during the plan update process: Dam/Levee Failure Drought Floods Geological Hazards (landslide, subsidence, and sinkholes) Hazardous Materials (Fixed Sites and In Transit) Summer Weather Hazards Tornado and Windstorm Winter Weather Hazards Human-Caused Hazards Infrastructure Failure Following an initial evaluation of hazard risk, the LPT discussed the results during the second planning meeting and added comment and context to the final assessment. Further information on the risk assessment process can be found in Section 3. 1.4.7 HAZARD MITIGATION STRATEGY The hazard mitigation strategy was structured in two phases. Initially, communities were provided a list of the hazard mitigation actions from the 2019 HMP. Communities were asked to assess their progress, employing a four-option status indicator to report updates: Not started In progress Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 5 Council Packet Page Number 46 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Completed Cancelled Communities were also asked to provide background information on each action where applicable, identifying: If an action was completed, when was it completed? Has the community seen any benefits from the project? If an action has not been started, why not? If an action is in progress, how much progress has been made? When is the project slated for completion? If an action is deleted, why? This evaluation process enabled communities to establish a foundation of ongoing initiatives for the revised hazard mitigation strategy. After completing the HIRA, the LPT focus shifted to developing new hazard mitigation actions to enhance the 2025 strategy. Communities received instructions on creating these new actions, and what supporting information would be necessary for each action included in the plan. Customized planning support meetings were available for communities that requested additional engagement in developing mitigation strategies. These efforts are reflected in Section 4. 1.4.8 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE The LPT developed a plan for HMP implementation and maintenance, including annual review and evaluation, integration with other planning mechanisms and continued public involvement. This information can be found in Section 5. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 6 Council Packet Page Number 47 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 2.Community Profile and Capabilities 2.1 Introduction Established in 1849, Ramsey County is the second-most populous county in the state and the smallest by land area in Minnesota, covering approximately 170 square miles. Its dense urban core gives it a vibrant economy and diverse population, estimated at 536,075 in 2023. The county encompasses several cities, including Arden Hills, Blaine, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, St. Anthony, Saint Paul, Shoreview, Spring Lake Park, Vadnais Heights, and White Bear Lake. White Bear Township is the only township in Ramsey County. Ramsey County’s economy is diverse, with a mix of public sector, healthcare, education, and service industries forming the backbone. Major employers include state government, major healthcare systems, and higher education institutions. Unemployment rates in the county have remained relatively low in recent years, though like many urban areas, some neighborhoods experience higher rates due to economic disparities. 2.2 Geography and Topography Ramsey County is anchored by its largest city and the state capital, Saint Paul, which forms part of the Twin Cities along with neighboring Minneapolis. The Mississippi River runs along the western boundary of the county, significantly shaping its topography and land use. Despite its urban nature, Ramsey County boasts an extensive park system, with over 6,500 acres of parkland, including lakes, trails, and natural reserves. It is bordered by four counties: Hennepin to the west, Dakota to the south, Washington to the east, and Anoka to the north. Ramsey County, Minnesota, has a relatively flat to gently rolling topography, typical of much of the Upper Midwest. Key features of the county's landscape include: •Low Elevation: The county sits at an average elevation of around 700-1,000 feet above sea level. The terrain is generally flat to gently undulating, with no significant mountain ranges or dramatic elevation changes. •Lakes and Waterways: Ramsey County is home to several lakes, wetlands, and rivers. The Mississippi River forms part of the county's western boundary and is a major geographical feature. Other notable bodies of water include Lake Phalen, Lake Como, and White Bear Lake (partly located in Ramsey County). These water features are integrated into the local landscape, providing natural beauty and recreation. •Glacial Influence: The topography of Ramsey County, like much of Minnesota, was shaped by glacial activity during the last ice age. The landscape includes remnants of glacial drift and moraine, resulting in the formation of lakes, wetlands, and gently rolling hills. •Urban Development: As the county is heavily urbanized, particularly in Saint Paul and surrounding areas, much of the natural topography has been altered by development. Parks, green spaces, and lakes offer glimpses of the region’s natural terrain. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 7 Council Packet Page Number 48 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 2.2.1 GEOGRAPHY Ramsey County is largely characterized by gently rolling terrain typical of the central lowland region, with areas of flat plains and gradual elevation changes. • Elevation: The elevation in Ramsey County ranges from around 690 feet above sea level near the Mississippi River to approximately 1,100 feet in some of the county’s highest points. • Highest Point: The highest natural point in Ramsey County is located near Indian Mounds Park in Saint Paul, offering scenic views of the Mississippi River Valley. • River Valleys: The Mississippi River Valley provides some of the most dramatic changes in elevation in the county. Bluffs and steep slopes are found along the riverbanks, particularly in the western portion of the county. 2.2.2 HYDROLOGY Despite being an urban county, Ramsey County has numerous water features that play an important role in its geography and landscape, with approximately 10% of the county’s total area being surface water. Groundwater: Groundwater is the water found beneath the earth's surface, stored in and moving through small spaces within soil, rocks, and geologic formations. In Ramsey County, a section of a large geologic basin, made up of several aquifer units, lies underground and supplies much of the water used for daily needs. Wells are used to extract groundwater from these aquifers, which is then utilized for drinking, heating and cooling, irrigation, manufacturing, and other purposes. Groundwater quality is influenced by its natural properties and any contaminants introduced into the aquifers, either naturally or through human activity. Approximately 15-20% of Ramsey County residents rely exclusively on groundwater for their drinking water. Rivers: o The Mississippi River forms part of the western boundary and is the most significant water feature. Historically, it has been a key transportation route and continues to play a major role in commerce and recreation. o The Minnesota River joins the Mississippi just south of Ramsey County. Lakes: There are over 80 lakes in Ramsey County. Prominent lakes include: o Lake Phalen: One of the largest lakes in the county and a popular recreational destination. o Como Lake: Located in Saint Paul’s Como Park, this is an urban lake with surrounding parkland. o White Bear Lake: Part of this large lake lies within Ramsey County, although most of it is in neighboring Washington County. It is a recreational hub and supports suburban communities. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 8 Council Packet Page Number 49 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Wetlands: The county has numerous wetlands that contribute to its diverse ecology, including areas near Battle Creek Regional Park and Rice Creek. Wetland areas are critical for stormwater management, wildlife habitats, and maintaining biodiversity in this urban landscape. Watershed Districts: There are five watershed districts and three water management organizations within the county. The five districts are Capitol Region Watershed District, Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Valley Branch Watershed District. The water management organizations are Lower Mississippi River Water Management Organization, Mississippi Water Management Organization, and Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization. 2.2.3 GEOLOGY Ramsey County has a diverse geological history shaped by both glacial and ancient marine processes. The landscape was heavily influenced by the Wisconsin Glaciation, which left behind glacial deposits, moraines, and outwash plains, forming the county's rolling terrain and contributing to the development of the Mississippi River. Beneath the glacial sediments, the bedrock consists primarily of sedimentary rocks like limestone, dolostone, and sandstone, deposited when the area was covered by shallow seas around 500 million years ago. The Mississippi River has carved valleys into these rock layers, exposing bluffs, while fertile soils from glacial deposits historically supported agriculture. Additionally, karst features are present in some areas due to the soluble limestone bedrock, although these are less common than in southeastern Minnesota. 2.3 Population and Demographics Demographic Overview Ramsey County is home to a diverse population that reflects a rich tapestry of racial, ethnic, and cultural groups. Understanding the demographic makeup of the county is critical to ensuring that hazard mitigation efforts are equitable and address the needs of all community members. Population Composition As of the most recent U.S. Census, Ramsey County has a population of 552,352 residents. Figure 1 shows Ramsey population density by U.S. Census block. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 9 Council Packet Page Number 50 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 1. Ramsey County Population by Census Block The racial and ethnic composition of the county is as follows: White: 59.6% Black or African American: 12.9% Hispanic or Latino: 8.2% Asian: 15.6% Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 10 Council Packet Page Number 51 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Native American or Alaska Native: 0.8% Other: 2.9% Minnesota is a designated refugee settlement area, and the county's diverse population includes significant immigrant communities. In 2018, the largest groups of foreign-born Minnesotans were born in Mexico (about 64,500); Somalia (33,500); India (30,200); Laos, including Hmong (24,400); Vietnam (18,600); China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan (18,600); Ethiopia (21,900); and Thailand, including Hmong (18,500). These estimates do not include U.S.-born children of these immigrants. They also likely underestimate the size of our immigrant populations because trust and language issues reduce response rates to Census surveys. Fifty-one percent of Minnesota's foreign-born population are naturalized U.S. citizens. Age Distribution The age distribution in Ramsey County reflects both a growing youth population and an aging community, with a median age of 36.4, slightly younger than the state median age of 39.1: 17 years and younger: 23.1% 18-24 years: 9.6% 25-34 years: 16.2% 35-44 years: 13.1% 45-54 years: 10.9% 55-64 years: 11.9% 65 years and older: 15.1% Understanding the composition, geographical distribution, and capability considerations of these diverse populations is essential, as these groups traditionally have heightened vulnerabilities before, during and after hazard events, particularly young children, the elderly, people with disabilities and serious health conditions, people who are socially isolated, and households with limited English proficiencies. 2.4 Social Vulnerability The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) is a critical tool used to assess the resilience of communities in the face of hazards. The SVI measures various factors that influence a community’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. In Ramsey County, these factors are essential for identifying populations that may be disproportionately affected by natural and human-made hazards. According to the latest SVI data, Ramsey County has an overall SVI score of 0.9419 (from a range of 0 to 1), indicating that the county’s vulnerability level is high compared to other counties across the country. Higher SVI scores reflect greater social vulnerability, which can increase the risks associated with hazard events. Disparities that persist in society, including social, economic, and health inequities, and which have impacted the historically disadvantages and underserved populations throughout the County, can be exacerbated by the impacts of extreme weather events. Periods of extreme heat, winter storms or Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 11 Council Packet Page Number 52 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 floods can cause increases in utilities and other expenses that are not easily absorbed by low-income families. Additionally, low-income communities and communities of color are the most vulnerable to a rapidly changing climate. 2.4.1 SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS Socioeconomic status affects hazard vulnerability because lower-income populations often have limited access to resources, such as safe housing, insurance, and emergency services, making them less resilient to disasters. Additionally, they may face greater challenges in recovery, prolonging the impacts of hazards. The percentage of residents living below the poverty line in Ramsey County is 12.9 %. Unemployment rates stand at 4.6%, with certain areas of the county experiencing even higher levels of joblessness. Household income in more vulnerable areas of the county is significantly lower than the countywide average, with 20.5% of countywide households reporting incomes of $35,000 or less. Housing cost-burdened occupied units (30%+ of income spent on housing costs) equal approximately 26.4% of the available housing stock. Data shows that educational attainment also plays a role, with 8.8% of residents over age 25 lacking a high school diploma. In the metro area, 4 of every 5 Areas of Concentrated Poverty are also census tracts where at least half of residents are people of color. Areas with lower income, more poverty and unemployment, and fewer adults with high school diplomas have a higher vulnerability score. Areas of moderate to high vulnerability are found along and north of I- 94, Saint Paul’s East and West Sides, and in areas in Roseville and Mounds View. 2.4.2 HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION AND DISABILITY The U.S. Census defines four major categories of disabilities: Sensory disabilities include blindness, deafness, or severe vision or hearing impairment. Physical disabilities are long-lasting conditions that substantially limit one or more basic physical activities, such as walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting, or carrying things. Self-care disabilities are conditions lasting six or more months that make it a challenge to dress, bathe, or move around inside the home. Go-outside-the-home disabilities are conditions lasting six or more months that make it difficult for people to shop or to visit a doctor’s office by themselves. Household composition and disability affect hazard vulnerability as families with young children, elderly members, or individuals with disabilities may face greater difficulties in evacuating, accessing emergency information, and receiving appropriate care during disasters. These groups often require additional support and tailored resources to ensure safety and resilience. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 12 Council Packet Page Number 53 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Vulnerability is also shaped by the composition of households in the county. Individuals under the age of 18 make up 23.1% of the population, while individuals over the age of 65 represent 15.1%. Additionally, 12.0% of individuals in Ramsey County report having a disability, which can affect the ability to prepare for, respond to and recover from disasters. Single-parent households account for 5.7% of all households in Ramsey County, a group that may face heightened vulnerability due to resource constraints. Areas with more elderly, youth, people with disabilities and single parent households with young children have a higher vulnerability score. Areas of moderate to high vulnerability are found along & north of I-94, Saint Paul’s East and West Sides, and in areas in Mounds View, New Brighton, Maplewood, White Bear Lake, Roseville and Little Canada. 2.4.3 MINORITY STATUS AND LANGUAGE Minority status and language barriers increase hazard vulnerability as marginalized communities may face systemic discrimination, limited access to resources, and reduced trust in authorities. Language barriers can hinder the ability to receive critical emergency information and access services. Limited English proficiency can put individuals at higher risk because they might not be aware of or fully understand evacuation orders and other warnings, instructions on how to access critical City services, or other communication from first responders. This barrier exacerbates efforts for preparedness, increases their risks during disasters, and prolongs the recovery process. Ramsey County is home to a diverse population, with 40.4% of residents identifying as a racial or ethnic minority. These groups often face barriers to accessing resources and services during emergencies. Language proficiency is a significant factor in vulnerability. Ramsey County has a significant portion of the population with limited English proficiency. 23.5% of residents speak a language other than English at home, with the most common languages being Asian and Pacific Island languages (10.6%) and Spanish (5.3%). This may indicate potential communication challenges in the event of an emergency. Areas with more minorities and people age 5+ who speak English "less than well" have a higher vulnerability score. Areas of moderate to high vulnerability are shown in areas along and north of I-94, Saint Paul’s East and West sides, and in areas in Mounds View, Saint Anthony, Maplewood, Lauderdale, Falcon Heights, and Little Canada. 2.4.4 HOUSING AND TRANSPORTATION Housing and transportation affect hazard vulnerability because individuals in substandard housing or densely populated areas are more likely to experience severe damage during disasters. Access to affordable housing can be a challenge and disasters that result in property damage can further constrain the housing market. For some low income or diverse populations, they may have only been able to purchase homes in areas with increased hazard risk exposure as they have limited income or have experienced issues with housing access due to historic discriminatory practices. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 13 Council Packet Page Number 54 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Limited access to reliable transportation can hinder evacuation efforts and reduce the ability to access emergency services or resources. The evacuation of people with disabilities and access and functional needs poses additional requirements. Many people who are otherwise self-sufficient may have special circumstances due to short-term issues such as physical or mental health issues, or have temporary resource shortages (e.g., fuel, transportation). Housing instability is a concern in Ramsey County, with 41.0% of residents living in renter- occupied units. Renters may have fewer resources to recover from hazard events and are often more vulnerable to displacement. In terms of transportation, 9.7% of households do not have access to a vehicle, making evacuation and accessing services more difficult in an emergency. The percentage of residents living in housing units with more than one occupant per room (overcrowded conditions) is 4.0%, which may increase the spread of illness and reduce resilience. The percentage of residents living in housing built in 1939 or earlier is 27.5%, increasing the likelihood of damage during hazard events. Areas with more multi-unit housing, mobile homes, crowded homes, homes with no vehicle access, and institutionalized group quarters have a higher vulnerability score. Areas of moderate to high vulnerability are found along and north of I-94, Saint Paul’s East and West sides, and in areas in Mounds View, New Brighton, Saint Anthony, Maplewood, North Saint Paul, Lauderdale, Falcon Heights, Blaine, White Bear Lake, Roseville, Vadnais Heights and Little Canada. 2.4.5 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF VULNERABILITY Centers for Disease Control (CDC)/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) SVI data shows that social vulnerability is not evenly distributed across Ramsey County. Certain areas have notably higher SVI scores. These areas are more likely to experience compounded challenges during disasters due to the concentration of vulnerable populations and limited resources. An interactive, visual, spatial distribution by census tract of Ramsey County’s SVI by each of the four key themes can be viewed at https://www.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=2bd18bc999dd452db6c680eba697f916. 2.4.6 HEALTH DISPARITIES Health disparities play a significant role in shaping a community's vulnerability to hazards, as underlying health conditions and unequal access to healthcare can hinder the ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. In Ramsey County, understanding these disparities is critical to ensuring that mitigation strategies address the unique needs of all residents. 2.4.6.1 Chronic Health Conditions Chronic health issues such as asthma, diabetes, heart disease, and respiratory conditions can exacerbate the impacts of disasters, especially for populations with limited access to healthcare. Pre-existing and underlying health conditions can elevate a heat event to a life-threatening situation. Those with less disposable income are affected disproportionately due to the inability to provide safe shelter, air Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 14 Council Packet Page Number 55 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 conditioning, medical care, and quality foods, and are also least able to obtain information related to extreme event risks and adaptation strategies. In Ramsey County: The hospitalization rate for asthma among residents is 7.7 per 10,000, but among youth ages 5 to 19, the asthma hospitalization rate is much higher at 15.4 per 10,000. Asthma hospitalization rates for children living in the Twin Cities metropolitan area are 67% higher than for children living in Greater Minnesota. In 2016, the rate of death from diabetes in the county was 20.8 per 100,000. In a 2014 metro survey, 13.9 percent of those from lower income households were diagnosed with diabetes, compared to 5.4 percent of those from higher income households. That’s an 8.5 percentage point gap between the two income groups. The same survey found that 15.8 percent of those with only a high school education reported being told they had diabetes compared to 4.3 percent of those with bachelor’s degrees. That’s an 11.5 percentage point gap between the groups. For 2012-2016, the five-year age adjusted rates for stroke deaths in Minnesota was 32.7 per 100,000 compared to a Ramsey rate of 39.6 per 100,000. During that same period, the five-year age adjusted rates for heart disease deaths in Minnesota was 116.6 per 100,000 compared to a Ramsey rate of 110. According to a 2014 survey in the Metro area, those with less education or lower income have a much higher risk of coronary heart disease, strokes and heart attacks. Among those with high school education, 12.1% report being diagnosed with heart disease compared to 3.1% of those with a bachelor’s degree. These chronic health conditions can increase the severity of harm experienced during events such as poor air quality from wildfires, extreme heat, or power outages. 2.4.6.2 Healthcare Access and Insurance Coverage Access to healthcare is a critical factor in resilience, as individuals without adequate healthcare are less likely to receive the care they need during and after disasters. In Ramsey County: 5.1% of the population is uninsured. In Ramsey County in 2014, among adults 25 years or older that take prescription medications, about 10 percent could not afford their prescriptions. 2.5 Economy Overall, the county has a stable and diverse economy with public administration, education, healthcare, and manufacturing as foundational pillars. According to the 2023 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimate, the median household income in Ramsey County is $77,812, and the employment rate 67%, with 63.6% working for private sector businesses. In comparison, the median household income for Minnesota is $85,086. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 15 Council Packet Page Number 56 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 2.6 Community Services and Infrastructure The following section offers an overview of community services and infrastructure in Ramsey County. Community services include essential functions such as healthcare, public safety, and emergency services. In terms of infrastructure, examples include the county's power utilities, water and sewer systems, and its transportation network, which supports both public and private transit options. 2.6.1 HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Ramsey County has a robust healthcare system with a variety of providers, including major hospitals like Regions Hospital, United Hospital, and M Health Fairview St. John’s Hospital. These facilities offer services ranging from emergency care and surgery to mental health and specialized treatments. In addition to large healthcare networks like HealthPartners and Allina Health, there are numerous clinics providing primary and specialty care. The county also has an extensive network of long-term care facilities, skilled nursing centers, and hospice services, supporting the elderly and those with chronic health conditions or end-of-life care needs. 2.6.2 PUBLIC SAFETY Ramsey County is served by a comprehensive network of public safety agencies, including police, fire, and emergency medical services (EMS), to ensure the safety and well-being of its residents. Police Services: The primary law enforcement agency in the county is the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office, which provides patrol, investigative services, and emergency response for unincorporated areas and supports municipal police departments. Cities like Saint Paul and Maplewood have their own police departments, with the Saint Paul Police Department being the largest in the county, offering full-service law enforcement, including specialized units like homicide, narcotics, and Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT). Fire Services: Ramsey County’s fire protection is provided by municipal fire departments, including the Saint Paul Fire Department, one of the largest and most comprehensive in the region. These departments handle fire suppression, fire prevention, rescue operations, and hazardous materials response. Many fire departments are integrated with EMS to provide rapid emergency medical assistance. Emergency Medical Services: EMS in Ramsey County are primarily provided by agencies like Allina Health EMS, Saint Paul Fire Department EMS, and other local first responders. These services provide advanced life support (ALS) and basic life support (BLS) care in emergencies, handling medical crises, accidents, and disasters. 2.6.3 UTILITIES Ramsey County provides its residents with a comprehensive array of utility services, including water, sewer, natural gas, and electricity, managed by various public and private entities. 2.6.3.1 Water and Sewer Services Water services in Ramsey County are primarily managed by local municipalities. The City of Saint Paul operates its own water utility, providing safe drinking water sourced from the Mississippi River and treated at the Saint Paul Regional Water Services facility. The water system is regularly monitored to Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 16 Council Packet Page Number 57 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 ensure compliance with federal and state safety standards. Similarly, wastewater treatment is handled by the Metropolitan Council, which manages a regional sewer system that collects and treats sewage from multiple municipalities in the area, including Saint Paul and surrounding suburbs. 2.6.3.2 Natural Gas Natural gas services in Ramsey County are primarily provided by Xcel Energy, which supplies natural gas to homes and businesses throughout the region. Xcel Energy is responsible for the maintenance and operation of gas pipelines, ensuring reliable delivery and adherence to safety regulations. The company also offers programs aimed at energy efficiency and conservation. 2.6.3.3 Electricity Xcel Energy also provides a significant portion of the county with electricity. The company offers various programs, including renewable energy options, rebates for energy-efficient appliances, and initiatives to help customers reduce their energy usage. Other utility providers in the area include Dakota Electric Association and the City of Saint Paul, which offers electricity services to some residents. 2.6.3.4 Transportation Comprehensive transportation infrastructure that encompasses an extensive network of roads, highways, and public transit systems, which are crucial for the mobility of residents and the efficiency of local commerce. The county manages approximately 250 miles of roads. Major highways such as I-94, I- 35W, and Highway 36 serve as key corridors for both local and regional traffic. Public transit services in Ramsey County are provided by Metro Transit, which operates various bus routes and light rail lines, including the upcoming Riverview Corridor streetcar line aimed at enhancing connectivity between major areas like Downtown Saint Paul and the Mall of America. Additionally, several Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) projects, such as the Rush Line and Gold Line, are planned to improve access to surrounding communities. Planned activities include expanding the capacity of major highways to accommodate growing traffic, implementing the "All Abilities Transportation Network" to promote inclusivity in transportation, and coordinating bike and pedestrian trails across the county. These initiatives align with the County's strategic goal of developing a sustainable, efficient, and multimodal transportation system that meets the needs of all residents. 2.7 Critical Facilities Critical facilities are interspersed throughout Ramsey County. Figure 2 shows all fire stations, post offices, schools, hospitals and airports in the county. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 17 Council Packet Page Number 58 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 2. Critical Facilities in Ramsey County 2.8 Land Use and Ownership Ramsey County features a mix of urban, suburban, and natural land use. The county is heavily urbanized, particularly in Saint Paul, which occupies much of the county's land. Residential, commercial, and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 18 Council Packet Page Number 59 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 industrial zones dominate, with neighborhoods of single-family homes and high-density apartments, along with business districts and manufacturing centers. In terms of ownership, a significant portion of the land is privately owned, especially residential and commercial properties. Public lands, managed by county and city authorities, include parks, government buildings, and protected areas. The county has been actively balancing development with conservation efforts, particularly in managing urban sprawl and preserving green spaces. There are approximately 229,000 housing units, with close to 60% as owner-occupied. Almost 90% of the housing units were built prior to 2000. 2.9 Climate Change and Trends Climate trends in Ramsey County, Minnesota, are reflective of broader regional patterns in the Upper Midwest, which has been experiencing noticeable shifts due to climate change. Key trends, as reported by the University of Minnesota’s Climate Adaptation Partnership and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources include: Rising Temperatures: Over the past few decades, Ramsey County has experienced a steady increase in average annual temperatures. Warmer winters, with fewer extreme cold days, are a prominent feature, though summers are also seeing more frequent heat waves. Ramsey County has already observed an average annual temperature increase of 3.5 degrees F, with much of this warming occurring during the coldest months of the year. Increased Precipitation: There has been a rise in annual precipitation, with heavier rainfall events becoming more common. This trend is contributing to localized flooding and increased stormwater management challenges in urban areas like Saint Paul. The region has experienced an increase in annual precipitation of 4.1 inches, while statewide an increase of 3.3 inches annually has been observed. By the end of the century, winter and spring precipitation are expected to increase by 30%, as projected by the University of Minnesota’s Climate Adaptation Partnership. Seasonal Shifts: Winters are becoming shorter and less severe, while springs and autumns are extending. Snowfall patterns are shifting, with less frequent but more intense snowstorms, followed by quicker melts. It has been observed that winters in Minnesota are warming dramatically, and spring weather is arriving up to two weeks earlier than in the early 1900s. Climate change is expected to continue altering the timing of the seasons in the future. Winters are predicted to become shorter, warmer, and wetter, with an increase in both spring and heavy precipitation. Summers are likely to grow longer and hotter, beginning earlier and extending later into the year. The last freeze of spring is projected to occur increasingly earlier, while the first freeze of fall will likely be delayed, further lengthening the growing season. More Extreme Weather Events: The region, including Ramsey County, has seen more intense storms, such as thunderstorms, tornadoes, and flash flooding events. This is consistent with a broader trend toward more frequent and severe extreme weather across the Midwest. For example, the term “mega-rain” is used to describe when at least six inches of rain fall over an area of at least 1,000 square miles. Since 1973, Minnesota has experienced 16 mega-rains, 11 of Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 19 Council Packet Page Number 60 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 those events have occurred since 2000, indicating a trend toward an increase in frequency and intensity of heavy rainfall events. 2.10Community Capabilities Assessment Participating jurisdictions completed assessments of community capabilities, focusing on the following capability areas: Planning and Regulatory Administrative and Technical Financial Education and Outreach Assessment results were utilized by communities to identify both capability gaps and existing capabilities that could be used to mitigate hazards. It is important to remember that the capabilities assessment was not a test, and most communities had very valid reasons for having or not having specific capabilities. The following sections indicate specific capabilities in each community, as identified by that community. 2.10.1 PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITIES Planning and regulatory capabilities include codes, ordinances, policies, laws, plans and programs that guide growth and development. These capabilities can either support risk reduction or create areas that are more vulnerable to disaster. Table 4. Planning Capabilities in Ramsey County Plans Capital Improvement PlanClimate Change Adaptation PlanCommunity Wildfire Protection PlanComprehensive/Master PlanContinuity of Operations PlanEconomic Development PlanLand Use PlanLocal Emergency Operations PlanStormwater Management PlanTransportation Plan Arden Hills • • • • • • Falcon Heights • • • • Gem Lake • • • • Lauderdale • • • • Little Canada • • • • • • • • Maplewood• • • • • • • • Mounds View • • • • • • • • New Brighton • • • • • • North Oaks• • • • • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 20 Council Packet Page Number 61 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Plans Capital Improvement PlanClimate Change Adaptation PlanCommunity Wildfire Protection PlanComprehensive/Master PlanContinuity of Operations PlanEconomic Development PlanLand Use PlanLocal Emergency Operations PlanStormwater Management PlanTransportation Plan North Saint Paul • • • • • Roseville • • • • • Saint Anthony• • • Saint Paul • • • • • • • • • Shoreview • • • • • • • • • Vadnais Heights • • • • • • White Bear Lake • • • • • White Bear Township• • • • • • • • Ramsey County •• • • • • • • Table 5. Regulatory Capabilities in Ramsey County Plan -Specific Land Use and Planning Ordinances Land AcquisitionBuilding CodeFlood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS)Floodplain OrdinanceSubstantial Damage Natural HazardOrdinancesSubdivision OrdinancesZoning Ordinance Arden Hills • • • • • • • Falcon Heights • • • • • Gem Lake • • • • Lauderdale • • • • • • Little Canada • • • • • • • • Maplewood• • • • • • • • Mounds View • • • • • • • • New Brighton • • • • • • North Oaks• • • • • North Saint Paul • • • • Roseville • • • Saint Anthony• • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 21 Council Packet Page Number 62 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Plan -Specific Land Use and Planning Ordinances Land AcquisitionBuilding CodeFlood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS)Floodplain OrdinanceSubstantial Damage Natural HazardOrdinancesSubdivision OrdinancesZoning Ordinance Saint Paul • • • • • • • • Shoreview • • • • • • • • Vadnais Heights • • White Bear Lake • • • • • White Bear Township• • • • • • Ramsey County • • 2.10.2 ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES Administrative and technical capabilities include staff, skills and tools. These capabilities can be used for mitigation planning and to carry out specific mitigation actions. They also include the ability to access, coordinate and implement these resources effectively. Table 6. Administrative and Technical Capabilities in Ramsey County Administrative and Technical Capabilities Chief Building OfficialCivil EngineerCommunity PlannerEmergency ManagerFloodplain AdministratorGIS CoordinatorPlanning BoardZoning OfficialGrant Writing CapabilityHazard Data and InformationGIS AnalysisMutual Aid Agreements Arden Hills • • • • • • • • • • • Falcon Heights • • • • • • • • Gem Lake • • • • • • • Lauderdale • • • • • • • • • Little Canada • • • • • • • Maplewood• • • • • • • • • • Mounds View • • • • • • • • • • • • New Brighton • • • • • • • • • North Oaks• • • • • • • • • • • • North Saint Paul • • • • • • • • • • • Roseville • • • • • • • • • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 22 Council Packet Page Number 63 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Administrative and Technical Capabilities Chief Building OfficialCivil EngineerCommunity PlannerEmergency ManagerFloodplain AdministratorGIS CoordinatorPlanning BoardZoning OfficialGrant Writing CapabilityHazard Data and InformationGIS AnalysisMutual Aid Agreements Saint Anthony••••••• Saint Paul • • • • • • • • • • • • Shoreview • • • • • • • • • • • • Vadnais Heights • • • • • • • • White Bear Lake • • • • • • • White Bear Township• • • • • • • • • • Ramsey County • • • • • • • • • 2.10.3 FINANCIAL CAPABILITIES Financial capabilities include resources to fund mitigation actions. Table 7. Financial Capabilities in Ramsey County FEMA) - Financial Capabilities Capital Improvement Project FundingCommunity Development Block GrantFederal Funding Programs (NonWater, Gas, Sewer or Electric FeesImpact Fees for New DevelopmentState Funding ProgramsStormwater Utility Fees Arden Hills • • • • •• • Falcon Heights • • • •• • Gem Lake • • • Lauderdale • • • •• Little Canada • • • •• • Maplewood • • • • Mounds View • • •• • New Brighton • • • •• • North Oaks• • • •• North Saint Paul • • • • •• Roseville • • • •• • Saint Anthony• • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 23 Council Packet Page Number 64 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 FEMA) - Financial Capabilities Capital Improvement Project FundingCommunity Development Block GrantFederal Funding Programs (NonWater, Gas, Sewer or Electric FeesImpact Fees for New DevelopmentState Funding ProgramsStormwater Utility Fees Saint Paul • • • • •• • Shoreview • • • • •• • Vadnais Heights • •• White Bear Lake • White Bear Township••••• Ramsey County 2.10.4 EDUCATION AND OUTREACH CAPABILITIES Education and outreach capabilities include programs and methods that Ramsey County and its communities can use to communicate about and encourage risk reduction. Table 8. Education and Outreach Capabilities in Ramsey County Education and Outreach Capability Community NewslettersHazard Awareness ProgramsLocal NewsOrganizations that Represent, Advocate for or Interact with Underserved and Vulnerable Communities Local Grassroots Initiatives Targeted to Diverse Populations at RiskSocial Media Arden Hills • • • • • Falcon Heights • • • • Gem Lake • • • • Lauderdale • • • Little Canada • • • • Maplewood• • • • • • Mounds View • • • • • • New Brighton • • • • • • North Oaks• • • • • North Saint Paul • • • • • • Roseville • • • • • • Saint Anthony• • • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 24 Council Packet Page Number 65 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Education and Outreach Capability Community NewslettersHazard Awareness ProgramsLocal NewsOrganizations that Represent, Advocate for or Interact with Underserved and Vulnerable Communities Local Grassroots Initiatives Targeted to Diverse Populations at RiskSocial Media Saint Paul • • • • • • Shoreview • • • • • • Vadnais Heights • White Bear Lake•••• White Bear Township Ramsey County • • • Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 25 Council Packet Page Number 66 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.Risk Assessment 3.1 Risk Assessment A risk assessment is the process of measuring the potential loss of life, personal injury, and economic and property damage resulting from identified hazards. It allows planning personnel to address and reduce hazard impacts and emergency management personnel to establish early response priorities by identifying potential hazards and vulnerable assets. Results of the risk assessment are used to inform mitigation planning processes, including determining and prioritizing mitigation actions that reduce a community’s risk to a specified hazard. Past, present, and future conditions must be evaluated to assess risk most accurately for each jurisdiction. The Ramsey County risk assessment includes the following: Identification of hazards of concern that impact Ramsey County Methodology and tools used to conduct the risk assessment Hazard ranking Hazards of concern profiles and vulnerability assessment 3.2 Hazard Summary 3.2.1 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS Ramsey County considered a full range of natural hazards that could impact the planning area. Hazard identification began with a review of the hazards assessed in the 2019 Ramsey County plan, the City of Saint Paul Hazard Mitigation Plan, and the State of Minnesota Hazard Mitigation Plan. A total of eight natural hazards and three human-caused hazards of concern were identified as significant hazards affecting the entire planning area, to be addressed in this plan: Dam/Levee Failure Drought Floods Geologic Hazards Hazardous Materials Summer Weather Hazards Tornado and Windstorm Winter Weather Hazards Human-Caused Hazards Infrastructure Failure 3.2.2 RAMSEY COUNTY DISASTER DECLARATIONS Table 9 lists FEMA declarations in Ramsey County. Table 9. Disaster Declarations in Ramsey County Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 26 Council Packet Page Number 67 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Ramsey County Disaster Declarations Declaration Type Date Year Incident Declaration Title Designated Declared TypeArea DR-80-MNDR1957-06-221957FloodFloodsStatewide Ramsey DR-188-MNDR 1965-04-11 1965Flood Flooding (County) Ramsey DR-255-MNDR 1969-04-18 1969Flood Flooding (County) Ramsey EM-3013-MN EM 1976-06-17 1976Drought Drought (County) FM-2018-MNFM1976-09-081976FireHuntersvilleStatewide FM-2023-MNFM1976-09-111976FireGalvin LineStatewide FM-2022-MN FM1976-09-11 1976Fire Little Swan Statewide FM-2021-MN FM1976-09-11 1976Fire Tate Statewide FM-2020-MN FM1976-09-11 1976Fire TamarackStatewide FM-2019-MN FM1976-09-11 1976Fire Tower Statewide FM-2024-MN FM1976-10-01 1977Fire McGregor Fire Statewide Severe Storms, Severe Flooding, Hail & DR-560-MNDR 1978-07-08 1978Storm Tornadoes Ramsey Severe Severe Storms, DR-797-MNDR 1987-08-06 1987Storm Tornadoes & Flooding Ramsey Severe Severe Storms, DR-993-MNDR 1993-06-11 1993Storm Tornadoes & Flooding Ramsey Severe Flooding, High DR-1175-MN DR 1997-04-08 1997Flood Winds,Severe Storms Ramsey Severe Storms, Severe Tornadoes, High Winds, DR-1187-MN DR 1997-08-25 1997Storm Flooding Ramsey Severe Storms, Straight Line Winds, & DR-1225-MN DR 1998-06-23 1998Tornado Tornadoes Ramsey Severe Severe Storms and DR-1333-MN DR 2000-06-27 2000Storm Flooding Ramsey Severe Winter Storms, DR-1370-MN DR 2001-05-16 2001Flood Flooding, & Tornadoes Ramsey Hurricane Katrina EM-3242-MN EM 2005-09-13 2005Hurricane EvacuationRamsey EM-3310-MN EM 2010-03-19 2010Flood Flooding Ramsey DR-1900-MN DR 2010-04-19 2010Flood Flooding Ramsey Severe Storms and DR-1982-MN DR 2011-05-10 2011Flood Flooding Ramsey Severe Storms, Straight- Line Winds, Flooding, DR-4182-MN DR 2014-07-21 2014Flood Landslides, & Mudslides Ramsey Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 27 Council Packet Page Number 68 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Ramsey County Disaster Declarations Severe Winter Storm, Straight-Line Winds, & DR-4442-MN DR 2019-06-12 2019Flood Flooding Ramsey EM-3453-MN EM 2020-03-13 2020Biological Covid-19 Ramsey DR-4531-MN DR 2020-04-07 2020Biological Covid-19 Pandemic Ramsey Source: FEMA 3.3 Assessment Methodology The LPT utilized a risk-based formula for assessing hazards in Ramsey County, where Risk = Threat x Vulnerability x Consequence. Specific sections of the hazard assessment are tied to each of these variables, giving a well-rounded and thorough examination of each hazard and its relation to Ramsey County and its communities. 3.3.1 THREAT Hazards were first assessed for the threat they pose to the county and communities. Elements of threat were assessed in the following sections in each hazard chapter: Hazard Profile Location Extent History Probability Climate Change Impacts 3.3.2 VULNERABILITY Ramsey County and its communities were also assessed for vulnerabilities to each disaster. The following vulnerabilities were assessed in each hazard chapter: Vulnerability of People Vulnerability of Property Vulnerability of the Environment Vulnerability of County and Community Operations 3.3.3 CONSEQUENCE Finally, hazards were assessed for the consequences Ramsey County and its communities could reasonably expect from an instance of the hazard. While a full scenario wasn’t used for each hazard, general impacts were reasonable extrapolated for each hazard. Impact on the Public Impact on Responders Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 28 Council Packet Page Number 69 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Impact on Continuity of Operations Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Impact on the Environment Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance 3.4 Hazard Rankings Each hazard was given a ranking based on three key elements of risk – threat, vulnerability and consequence. Table 10. Hazard Rankings Hazard Threat Vulnerability ConsequenceScore Hazard Rank Dam/Levee Rare – 1 Localized - 2Limited – 2 5Medium Failure DroughtOccasional – Extensive – 4 Limited – 2 8Medium 2 Floods Frequent – 3Localized –2 Critical – 3 8Medium Geologic Occasional – Limited – 1 Negligible – 1 4Low Hazards 2 Hazardous Occasional – Limited – 1 Limited - 2 5Medium Materials 2 Summer Likely – 4 Widespread – 3Limited – 2 9High Weather Hazards Tornado and Frequent – 3Widespread – 3Catastrophic – 4 10 High Windstorm Winter Weather Likely – 4 Widespread – 3Limited – 2 9High Hazards Human-Caused Rare – 1 Limited – 1 Catastrophic – 4 6Medium Hazards Infrastructure Rare – 1 Limited – 1 Catastrophic - 4 6Medium Failure Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 29 Council Packet Page Number 70 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Failure ture cInfrastru MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium Hazards Caused -Human MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium Hazards Weather nter Wi HighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHigh tormWinds 30 Tornado and HighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHigh Weather Hazards Summer HighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighHigh Materials Hazardous MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium Geologic Hazards LowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLowLow Floods ommunity. MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium Drought s g n MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium i k hazard rankings by c n a Failure R Levee Dam/ d shows r a MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium z a Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - H y t i n | Multi u Lake m s . Hazard Rankings m County aint Paul . Hazard Rankings aul o 11 lewood 11 C te Bear Township int P ttle Canada 5 i . Jurisdiction Arden HillsFalcon HeightsGem LakeLauderdaleLMapMounds ViewNew BrightonNorth OakNorth SRosevilleSaint AnthonySaShoreviewVadnais HeightsWhite BearWhiRamsey County 3 Table Table Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 71 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.6 Dam/Levee Failure 3.6.1PROFILE Dams are structures built across a river, stream, or other body of water designed to control and manage water flow. Dams create reservoirs, which can supply water for domestic, agricultural, and industrial use, manage water resources, and provide recreational opportunities. Levees are an embankment or natural ridge constructed along the edges of a river or other body of water to prevent flooding of the adjacent land. Levees serve to protect populated areas, agricultural lands, and infrastructure from floodwaters. Failures of dams and levees can result in sudden and severe flooding. The causes of such failures include natural hazards (earthquakes, flooding severe weather conditions), human-made threats (terrorism, human error) or other key factors such as structural deficiencies or improper maintenance, leading to compromise the integrity of the dam/levee. When a dam/levee fails, the rapid release of water can inundate downstream areas, leading to loss of life, extensive property damage, and environmental destruction. Populated areas, agricultural lands, and infrastructure located downstream are particularly vulnerable to impacts. The cascading effects can also include disruption of utilities, transportation networks, and other critical infrastructure. There are seven dams and no levees located in Ramsey County. 3.6.2 LOCATION Table 10 shows dams that are located within the Ramsey County geographical boundaries. There are also three additional dams outside the county’s borders that have been identified as potential risks to the county: Coon Rapids Dam in Anoka County and St. Anthony Falls Upper and Lower Lock and Dams in Hennepin County. Table 12. Dams Located in Ramsey County Primary Year NID Dam Classification Name Owner River PurposeBuilt Height Type Phalen Arlington City of Saint Flood Risk Creek 1989 Earth Significant 15' Detention Paul Reduction tributary WD of Ramsey-Flood Risk Battle CreekBattle Creek1982Earth High 30' Washington Reduction Metro WD of Battle Creek Ramsey-Flood Risk Battle Creek 1983 unk High 16' Washington Middle Reduction Metro WD of Battle Creek Ramsey-Flood Risk Battle Creek 1983 unk High 18' Upper Washington Reduction Metro City of New Rice Creek Hansen Park Recreation 7’ Low Brighton tributary Keller Lake RWMWD Keller Creek Recreation 1938 Gravity Low 12' Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 31 Council Packet Page Number 72 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Primary Year NID Dam Classification NameOwner River PurposeBuilt Height Type Rice Creek Other, Round Lake USFWS Water Supply 1960 Low 10' tributary Earth Source: National Inventory of Dams, Minnesota DNR 3.6.3 EXTENT In the U.S., a common practice among federal and state dam safety officials is to classify dams according to the potential impact a dam failure or breach would have on upstream or downstream areas or locations remote from the dam. Three classification levels are used: Low, Significant, and High. Table 13 explains these classifications. Table 13. Dam Hazard Potential Classification System Dam Hazard Potential Classification System Classification SummaryPotential Economic, Loss of Life Environmental, and Lifeline Losses Low Hazard Dams assigned the Low Hazard potential None Low; generally classification are those where failure or expected limited to owner misoperation results in no probable loss of human life and low economic and/or environmental losses. Losses are principally limited to the owner’s property. Significant Dams assigned the Significant Hazard potential None Yes Hazard classification are those dams where failure or Expected misoperation results in no probable loss of human life but can cause economic loss, environmental damage, disruption of lifeline facilities, or can impact other concerns. Significant Hazard potential classification dams are often located in predominantly rural or agricultural areas but could be located in areas with population and significant infrastructure. High Hazard Dams assigned the High Hazard potential Probable; Yes (but not classification are those where failure or one or more necessary for this misoperation will probably cause loss of human expected classification) life. Source: National Inventory of Dams Any owner of a dam with a hazard potential classification of High is required to develop an emergency action plan (EAP). An EAP is a formal document that identifies potential emergency conditions at a dam Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 32 Council Packet Page Number 73 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 and specifies preplanned actions to be followed to minimize potential property damage and loss of life. Every EAP must be tailored to site-specific conditions but generally contains six basic elements: Notification flowchart Emergency detection, evaluation, and classification Roles and responsibilities Preparedness activities Inundation maps Appendices Dam failure is the collapse or failure of an impoundment that causes significant downstream flooding. The principal consequences of dam failure are injury, loss of life, and significant downstream property damage. The energy of water stored behind even a small dam is capable of causing loss of life and significant property damage to people living downstream. The collapse or structural failure of a dam may be caused by severe storm, earthquake, improper maintenance, erosion, or acts of terrorism. A failure in a dam upstream can cause additional strain and failure risk to dams further downstream. The Battle Creek dams are the only dams located within Ramsey County that are classified as High and have developed EAPs for review. The Coon Rapids Dam and the St. Anthony Falls Upper and Lower Locks and Dams are classified as significant and have also written EAPs. 3.6.4 HISTORY There have been no dam failures in Ramsey County in the past, though there have been several dam failures within the State of Minnesota. Most reported failures have been in low hazard dams, with at least one exception; the Thomson Dam in northeastern Minnesota overtopped in 2012 due to heavy rains, causing significant damage to its hydroelectric station and contributing to flooding downstream. There have been no known deaths, injuries, or property damage from dam or levee failures in the county. The effects on life and property in the area could be significant if a dam were to fail because of the nature of the built environment underneath it. 3.6.5 PROBABILITY The probability of a specific dam failing in any given year is extremely low. Some common causes of dam failures include overtopping, foundation defects, cracking, inadequate maintenance, or piping and seepage. According to the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, the primary cause of reported dam failures between 2010 – 2019 was overtopping, most often due to flooding events. 3.6.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change can significantly affect the risk and severity of dam and levee failures. The changes most likely to impact Ramsey County are: Changes in seasonal patterns and increased precipitation intensity – more frequent and intense rainfall events or earlier spring snowmelt can result in higher risk of flooding, putting additional stress on dams and levees. According to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Climate Change Information website, heavy rains are now more common in Minnesota and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 33 Council Packet Page Number 74 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 more intense than at any time on record. Climate projections indicate these big rains will continue increasing into the future. Increased extreme weather events – more frequent and severe storms can cause a higher risk for dam or levee overtopping. Temperature changes, including increased freeze-thaw cycles – this could impact the integrity of dam and levee foundations. Increased demand on water resources – increased demand has the potential for more frequent drawdowns of reservoirs and added stress on dam operations and structures. 3.6.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.6.7.1 People All individuals who live, work, and recreate in areas downstream of the dams are at risk if they are unable to escape the inundation zone following a failure. Inadequate warning from public warning systems, such as those provided through Everbridge, local radio stations, and other means can increase the number of people at risk. Rising water from a dam failure can cause the same type of impacts as riverine and/or flash flooding, including injuries and fatalities from drowning, blunt force trauma, or exposure. If inundation is expected, populations will likely need to be evacuated and may lose access temporarily or long-term to housing, workplace, and other facilities. Not only can this have immediate physical impacts on people, it can also have longer-term mental health impacts as people work through the process of having their lives drastically altered. 3.6.7.2 Property Inundation from dam failure can cause minor damage up to total loss of structures, utilities, and roadways. In addition, inundation is likely to impact phone lines, potable water, cable, and electricity; wastewater and recovery time for these lifelines may be extended. The one high hazard dam located in Ramsey County, Battle Creek Dam, is situated within Battle Creek Regional Park. Battle Creek runs through the central eastern metropolitan area of the county. It primarily flows through wooded parks before emptying into Pigs Eye Lake and eventually discharging to the Mississippi River. Neighborhoods and public spaces adjacent to the creek, particularly near Pigs Eye Lake could be inundated by a sudden release of water if the Battle Creek Dam were to fail. 3.6.7.3 Environment The natural environment is also at risk for impacts caused by dam failure. River habitats, and nearby wetlands, meadows, and wooded areas may suffer from sedimentation and pollution caused by hazardous materials (e.g., pesticides, fuel, sewage). Floodwaters may cause significant erosion and can harm wildlife through drowning, disease, and disruption of habitat. A sudden release of water could erode stream banks, damage wetlands, and disrupt the ecosystems and wildlife habitats of Battle Creek Park. A failure of Battle Creek Dam could also send sediment, debris, and pollutants into Pigs Eye Lake and, eventually, into the Mississippi River, impacting water quality and aquatic life. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 34 Council Packet Page Number 75 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.6.7.4 County and Community Operations Of the dams located in Ramsey County, the Battle Creek dams (Battle Creek, Battle Creek Middle, and Battle Creek Upper) are classified as High. These are located within the Battle Creek Regional Park which should limit the impact to county and community operations if there is a failure. 3.6.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Loss of life and injury due to sudden flooding. Displacement of residents from inundated areas, leading to temporary or long-term evacuation. Contamination of water systems, leading to public health impacts. Disruption of daily life and access to essential services (e.g., healthcare, education). Impact on Responders Increased risk and operational challenges to emergency responders due to rapid onset of flooding and compromised access to affected areas, complicating rescue and relief efforts. Strain on emergency services, including search and rescue operations and medical response. Potential exposure to hazardous materials released during the flood. Continuity of Operations Disruption of governmental and critical services (e.g., water treatment, power supply). Long-term impacts on the ability to resume normal operations. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Destruction or severe damage to homes, businesses, and public buildings. Short- and long-term structural damage to affected infrastructure, requiring extensive repair or rebuilding. Potential for cascading failures in other infrastructure (e.g., electrical grid, transportation systems). Impact on the Environment Extensive erosion and sedimentation, altering waterways and landscapes. Long-term damage to ecosystems, including loss of habitat and biodiversity. Contamination of soil and water, affecting agriculture and drinking water sources. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Immediate and long-term economic losses due to damage to businesses and property. Costs associated with emergency response, recovery, and reconstruction. Loss of income and employment in affected areas. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 35 Council Packet Page Number 76 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Decreased property values and potential long-term economic decline in the region. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Erosion of public trust in local and regional authorities if the dam failure is perceived as preventable or if the response is inadequate. Increased scrutiny and criticism of regulatory and oversight bodies responsible for dam safety. 3.7 Drought 3.7.1 PROFILE Drought is a prolonged period of significant below-average precipitation in a given location. It is a normal phase in the climate cycle of most regions, originating from a deficiency of precipitation over an extended period of time, usually a season or more. Drought can lead to water shortages. Droughts are climate patterns that occur over long periods of time as the result of many causes. These patterns are often exacerbated by climatic patterns such as La Nina, human activities such as over- extraction of groundwater, and inefficient water use practices. Anomalies of precipitation and temperature may last from several months to several decades. How long they last depend on interactions between the atmosphere and the oceans, soil moisture and land surface processes, topography, internal dynamics, and the accumulated influence of global weather systems. 3.7.2 LOCATION Drought is a regional hazard, impacting large areas of land at once. The entire planning area is susceptible to drought conditions. Figure 3 shows an example of drought conditions from November 2024. Drought condition maps are updated weekly. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 36 Council Packet Page Number 77 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 3. Drought Conditions Source: United States Drought Monitor 3.7.3 EXTENT The entirety of the county is susceptible to any of the classifications of drought, up to and including D4 drought as outlined in Figure 4. Drought Classification Categories Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 37 Council Packet Page Number 78 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 4. Drought Classification Categories Source: United States Drought Monitor 3.7.4 HISTORY Minnesota typically experiences some degree of drought each year. Throughout the years, these droughts have varied in severity and duration. Major droughts were recorded in the 1930s, peaking between 1934 and 1936, in 1950s, peaking in 1956, and one of the driest winters on record, the winter of 1976-1977. More recently, notable droughts were recorded in 1988, 2006-2009, and 2012-2013. One of the most severe droughts in recent years, the 2021 drought affected much of Minnesota. Extremely low precipitation and high temperatures led to water shortages, record-low lake levels, and significant impacts on agriculture and ecosystems. Relevant to this, wildfires were also a major concern, with several large fires occurring in the state. Figure 5 illustrates the proportion of land area within the county that has been affected by different levels of drought severity since 2000, and the slight trend toward more frequent and severe drought activity in recent years. Monitoring drought trends provides critical data to assess risk, enhance preparedness, and make informed policy decisions. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 38 Council Packet Page Number 79 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 5. Historical Droughts in Ramsey County Source: United States Drought Monitor Members of the LPT noted that most jurisdictions in Ramsey County have instituted water restrictions, mostly focusing on lawn watering on even/odd days. The LPT also noted that only the Governor of Minnesota can completely restrict water usage. 3.7.5 PROBABILITY The probability of a drought in Ramsey County depends on various climatic factors, which vary from year to year. The United States Drought Monitor tracks drought impacts weekly at a variety of jurisdiction levels, including at the county level. Drought conditions were reviewed for a total of 1,257 weeks between the first week of January 2000 and the week of August 20, 2024. Ramsey County experienced some level of drought condition in 44% of the recorded weeks, with the vast majority of those drought conditions spent in the lower echelon of drought severity. FEMA’s National Risk Index tool notes that Ramsey County is at a very low risk of drought, although this is based on agricultural impacts only. 3.7.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change is expected to alter precipitation patterns, temperatures, and extreme weather events, which could all contribute to the frequency, severity, and duration of droughts. Changes in precipitation patterns. It is anticipated that there will be increased variability in precipitation including irregular rainfall and seasonal shifts which could impact the availability of water throughout the year. For Ramsey County, warmer winter temperatures could lead to a shift from snow to more rainfall, resulting in reduced snowpack and less water stored for spring thaw. This could impact the availability of water for critical growing seasons. Since 1866, the MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has identified 19 historical “mega-rain” events, in which six inches of rain fall over more than 1,000 square miles. More than half of these events occurred in the past 10 years. These mega-rain events have become four times more frequent since the year 2000 as compared to the previous 30 years. According to the University of Minnesota Climate Change Partnership, future Minnesotans will likely see longer dry periods and more flash droughts with heavier rain events in between. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 39 Council Packet Page Number 80 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Temperature increases. Higher temperatures will likely lead to increased evaporation rates and soil moisture depletion, both have the potential to significantly impact plants, crops, and vegetation. More frequent and prolonged heatwaves, which can stress water resources and increase the likelihood of drought conditions, are also a potential impact. According to DNR, the average temperatures in Minnesota have increased by almost 3 degrees (F) since 1895, and the 10 warmest years on record for Minnesota have occurred in the past 20 years. Increases in temperature are expected to continue. Extreme weather events. Droughts are expected to increase in severity and lead to persistent dry conditions. Additionally, it is also predicted that intense rainfall events will increase, leading to flash floods. This will not ease drought conditions and could, in fact, lead to intensified flood-drought cycles. 3.7.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.7.7.1 People According to the National Drought Mitigation Center, droughts have both direct and indirect impacts on people. All individuals who live, work, and recreate within the county are at risk from the impacts of drought. Drought can lead to impacts on the water supply, and agriculture impacts. Health effects such as an increased risk of respiratory issues due to dry, dusty conditions can also impact residents of Ramsey County. 3.7.7.2 Property Structures, utilities, and transportation are minimally impacted by drought. Drought’s impacts on soils can impact home and building foundations; according to the Drought Impact Reporter (DIR), the Mankato Free Press reported on some Twin Cities homes having developed cracks in foundations and interior walls due to drought conditions in 2022. All property in the county is vulnerable to the impacts of drought. Drought can also create water supply challenges by reducing groundwater availability for domestic and government uses. The DIR notes multiple instances since the year 2000 of water usage restrictions. 3.7.7.3 Environment Drought is significantly impactful to the environment and natural resources. Long-term drought can impact lake and river levels. It impacts agriculture through crop loss, insect infestations, plant diseases, and wind erosion. Algae blooms occur in the river, and streams may be cut off. Environmental losses also include plants and wildlife, because air and water quality can plummet with associated dust, wildland fires, and habitat loss. Extreme heat alongside drought may amplify these impacts. 3.7.7.4 County and Community Operations The impact of a drought on a community can be profound, impacting water supply, agriculture, economy, public health, and the environment. Drought can strain on water systems and infrastructure – increased demand and decreased supply can stress the water infrastructure, possibly leading to failure and the need to invest in costly maintenance and/or new infrastructure to ensure a reliable water supply. Drought can impact operations that requires water to function; a key example is the fire service. Drought can also reduce the availability of potable water, leading to water rationing and restrictions, for residential areas and agriculture. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 40 Council Packet Page Number 81 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.7.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Water scarcity, leading to restricted access to potable water for drinking, hygiene, and sanitation. Increased health risks, including dehydration, malnutrition, and respiratory issues from poor air quality due to dust. Rising food prices and potential food shortages due to reduced agricultural output. Mental health impacts from prolonged stress, uncertainty, and potential displacement. Impact on Responders Strain on emergency services to manage water distribution, firefighting, and health services. Increased demand for medical services due to heat-related illnesses and poor air quality. Challenges in managing public order, particularly if water shortages lead to unrest or conflicts over resources. Continuity of Operations Disruption of water-dependent operations, including agriculture, industry, and public utilities. Need for water rationing or prioritizing critical services, such as healthcare and firefighting. Challenges in maintaining normal government operations due to resource scarcity and increased demands on infrastructure. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Damage to infrastructure such as water treatment plants, reservoirs, and pipelines due to overuse or drying up. Increased wear and tear on buildings and roads due to heat stress and lack of moisture. Potential for increased fire hazards, leading to property loss and infrastructure damage. Impact on the Environment Degradation of ecosystems, including loss of wetlands, forests, and wildlife habitats. Reduced water levels in rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, impacting aquatic life and biodiversity. Increased soil erosion and desertification, leading to long-term land degradation. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Decreased river levels impacting movement of goods in/out of the county. Significant economic losses in agriculture, particularly in crop and livestock production. Reduced industrial productivity due to water shortages, impacting sectors like manufacturing, energy, and mining. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 41 Council Packet Page Number 82 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Long-term economic downturn from loss of revenue, increased unemployment, and higher costs for water and food imports. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Criticism of water management policies, including allocation, conservation, and infrastructure investment. Potential for social unrest or political challenges if the public perceives inequities or failures in drought response efforts. 3.8 Floods 3.8.1 PROFILE Floods occur when water inundates land that is typically dry. This can occur during periods of intense rainfall, high tides coupled with storm surges, rapid snowmelt, or the failure of dams or levees. Damaging floods may happen with only a few inches of water, or it may cover a house to the rooftop. Flood events can develop in a matter of minutes or evolve over an extended timeframe, persisting for days, weeks, or more. Among all natural disasters related to weather, floods are the most frequent and have the broadest impact, often being the primary type of weather-related calamity affecting reservations. Flash or urban flooding occurs when storm sewers and other drainage systems are overwhelmed by the amount of rain falling in a short period of time. The National Weather Service (NWS) gives the advice “Turn Around, Don’t Drown” for flash floods. What makes flash floods dangerous is their sudden nature and fast-moving water. Flooding is a hazard that can strike in any U.S. state or territory, as well as any global location prone to rainfall. In the United States, floods claim more lives annually than tornadoes, hurricanes, or lightning strikes. High-risk areas for flash floods include densely populated regions, vicinities adjacent to rivers, and locales near dams. Intense downpours have the potential to induce floods even on parched ground; areas recently affected by wildfires in mountainous regions are particularly vulnerable, and ice jams along with snowmelt are additional factors that can contribute to flash floods. 3.8.2 LOCATION Those communities along the banks of the Mississippi, including the City of Saint Paul, are particularly vulnerable to riverine flooding. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 42 Council Packet Page Number 83 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 6. 100-Year Floodplain in Ramsey County Source: 2019 MHMP Ramsey County Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan43 Council Packet Page Number 84 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is a federal program that provides flood insurance to property owners, renters and business located in communities with mapped floodplains that opt to participate in the program. To participate in the NFIP, a community must: Adopt a floodplain ordinance that meets or exceeds minimum NFIP criteria, including regulations on land use, development controls, and building codes within the floodplain, as defined by the community’s Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). Pass a resolution of intent to participate in the program. Comply with FEMA minimum standards for floodplain management. Enforce enacted regulations. The following Ramsey County communities participate in the NFIP: City of Arden HillsCity of Roseville City of Blaine (Ramsey/Anoka County)City of Shoreview City of Falcon HeightsCity of Spring Lake Park (Ramsey/Anoka Counties) City of Gem Lake City of St. Anthony (Ramsey/Hennepin City of Lauderdale Counties) City of Little Canada City of Saint Paul City of Maplewood City of Vadnais Heights City of Mounds View City of White Bear Lake City of New Brighton (Ramsey/Washington Counties) City of North Saint Paul Township of White Bear The City of North Oaks has a current effective map date of June 4, 2010, but is not a member of the NFIP. 3.8.3 EXTENT In hazard analysis, the 100-year and 500-year floodplains maps are utilized for understanding flood risk and informing land-use planning, emergency response, and infrastructure development. These designations represent areas that have a 1% (100-year) and 0.2% (500-year) chance of flooding in any given year. These maps help identify areas most at risk of flooding, which is vital for minimizing damage and ensuring public safety. 100-Year Floodplain: This area is commonly used as the baseline for regulatory and insurance purposes. It is the standard by which flood insurance requirements are determined, and it guides zoning regulations, construction codes, and infrastructure projects. Because these areas are more likely to experience flooding, they are most often prioritized for flood prevention and mitigation measures. 500-Year Floodplain: Although the likelihood of flooding in these areas is lower, the 500-year floodplain helps to identify areas that could be affected by more extreme events, including critical infrastructure, Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 44 Council Packet Page Number 85 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 such as hospitals, emergency facilities, and power plants, where the consequences of flooding would be severe. 3.8.4 HISTORY The National Climatic Data Center Storm Events Database was consulted for records of historical floods and flash flooding. The earliest records occurred in 1997. Since 1997, Ramsey County has experienced six major flood events, causing $4.3 million in property damage and no injuries or fatalities. The county has also experienced fifteen major flash flood events causing over $700k in property damage, one fatality and one injury. Figure 7 shows flood and flash flood history in Ramsey County. Figure 7. Ramsey County Historical Floods, 1997 - August 2024 Federally Property Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Declared Damage Disaster Flash Saint Paul 7/5/2020 0 0 Unknown Flood March –April Ramsey County Flood 0 0 unknown Yes 2019 Flash Saint Paul 9/17/2015 0 0 unknown Flood Saint Paul 6/18/2014 Flood 0 0 $1,900,000 Yes Flash Falcon Heights 6/21/2013 0 0 unknown Flood Flash Saint Paul 6/21/2013 0 0 unknown Flood Flash New Brighton 8/16/2011 0 0 unknown Flood Flash White Bear Lake 7/16/2011 0 0 $500,000 Flood Flash Ramsey County 3/16/2011 Unk Unk Unknown Yes Flood Flash Little Canada 8/10/2010 0 0 unknown Flood Flash Saint Paul 6/26/2010 0 0 unknown Flood Saint Paul 3/20/2010 Flood 0 0 $2,400,000 Yes Flash Saint Paul 9/20/2007 1 0 $200,000 Flood Flash Countywide 10/4/2005 0 0 unknown Flood Ramsey County 10/4/2005 Flood 0 0 unknown Flash North Portion 9/21/2005 0 0 unknown Flood Flash Ramsey Co. 6/20/2005 0 0 $2,000 Flood Flash Saint Paul 6/25/2003 0 0 unknown Flood Flash Vadnais Heights 7/28/2002 0 0 unknown Flood Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 2 Council Packet Page Number 86 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Federally Property Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Declared Damage Disaster Ramsey County 5/1/2001 Flood 0 0 unknown Yes Ramsey County 4/1/2001 Flood 0 0 unknown Flash Roseville 9/2/2000 0 0 unknown Flood Flash Saint Paul 7/1/1997 0 1 unknown Flood Ramsey County 4/4/1997 Flood 0 0 unknown Source: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information Flooding in 2010 was caused by accumulating snowfall across the Upper Midwest and Northern Plains, with snowfall water equivalent amounts as high as six inches. Freezing temperatures broke in March of that year, accelerating melting and unleashing 3-6 inches of liquid water on the surface. Ice jams exacerbated flooding problems. The flooding caused $2.4 million in property damages, and no deaths or injuries. Flooding in 2014 directly impacted Saint Paul. Parts of Minnesota received 10-12 inches of rain over a week in June, which was anywhere from 400-600% above normal amounts. The Twin Cities had their wettest start of the year since 1871. Saint Paul Airport deployed a flood wall which closed two of their shorter runways. Due to floodwaters affecting downtown Saint Paul and covering Harriet Island, the th Taste of Minnesota and 4 of July fireworks show were moved to different locations. High water on the Mississippi also forced the Minnesota Centennial Showboat to postpone a week of shows. This flooding caused $1.9 million in property damages, and no deaths or injuries. A flood’s crest is the level at which a river peaks before it starts to recede. Figure 8 shows historical flood crests for flooding in the Mississippi River at Saint Paul and South Saint Paul, as well as historical flood crests for Rice Creek in Mounds View. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 3 Council Packet Page Number 87 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 8. Historical Flood Crests Historical Flood Crests for Historical Flood Crests for Historical Flood Crests for Rice Mississippi River at Saint Paul, Mississippi River at South Saint Creek in Mounds View, MN MN Paul, MN Height Date Height Height (Feet) Date Date (Feet) (Feet) 6/19/2014 12.25 4/16/1965 26.01 4/29/2001 703.04 8/16/2011 11.17 4/15/1969 24.52 4/18/2001 703.03 5/24/2012 10.49 4/18/2001 23.76 4/13/1997 702.90 5/19/2013 10.43 4/30/2001 23.20 6/26/2014700.94 3/22/2010 9.55 4/13/1997 22.37 6/25/1993 699.98 7/6/2015 9.45 4/16/1952 22.02 3/30/2011 698.95 3/31/201320.19 3/24/2010 698.56 20.17 7/02/2013 694.84 6/29/2024 (P) 6/03/2012 694.02 6/26/2014 20.13 4/01/2009 693.87 Source: NOAA Water Prediction Service 3.8.5 PROBABILITY Minor flooding is an annual occurrence in Ramsey County. According to the Storm Events Database, six major flood events occurred over the 32-year period presented, with a probability of a major flood event every 5 years. Fifteen flash/urban flooding events occurred in the same period, presenting a probability of almost one major flash flood every two years. As storms become more severe and rainfall becomes heavier, these probabilities may increase. 3.8.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change could significantly impact riverine flooding through changes in seasonal and increased precipitation and intensity, changes in snowmelt and runoff patterns, increased stress on flood management infrastructure, such as dams, levees, and stormwater systems, and altered river and watershed dynamics. These changes may result in rising river levels, increased risk of flood-related damage, and more intense and frequent flooding events. Similarly to potential changes to riverine flooding, climate change could also impact flash flooding through increased frequency and intensity of heavy rainfall, altered seasonal precipitation patterns, and stress on stormwater infrastructure. In addition, increased urbanization and expanded impervious surfaces, changes in land use and vegetation, and changing soil and drought cycles may lead to more frequent and severe flash floods, with higher runoff and rapid onset, particularly in urban areas of the county. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 4 Council Packet Page Number 88 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.8.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.8.7.1 People Flash floods and river flooding can lead to injury or loss of life. In urban areas, rapidly rising water levels can trap residents in their homes, vehicles, or other spaces, often in immediate danger and requiring rescue. The poorest residents suffer disproportionately to flood situations, especially those who have been less able to fund homeowner’s insurance to protect against flood losses. Mental health issues are experienced by people who have experience flood losses, including anxiety, fear, anger, anger, sadness and grief. 3.8.7.2 Property Homes and businesses in low-lying areas and in flood-prone areas are at significant risk of flooding and damage. It is common for these structures to suffer structural damage, water in lower levels, and loss of personal property. Facilities in these areas can also see declines in property values and increased insurance costs. Hazus runs from the 2019 plan estimate the number of households that are expected to be displaced from their homes due to the flood and the associated potential evacuation. Hazus also estimates those displaced people that may require accommodations in temporary public shelters. The model estimates 2,015 households may be displaced due to the flood. Displacement includes households evacuated from within or very near to the inundated area. Of these, the model estimates 342 people (out of a total population of 508,640) may seek temporary shelter in public shelters. Repetitive loss properties are defined as properties that have had 2 or more flood insurance claims of $1,000 or more in any rolling 10-year period. Property owners are asked to consider mitigation activities such as acquisition, relocation, or elevation, among other options. FEMA’s Repetitive Loss (RL) properties strategy is to eliminate or reduce the damage to property and the disruption to life caused by repeated flooding of the same properties. Property owners are notified of their status by FEMA. There are two repetitive loss properties in Ramsey County, both located in the City of Saint Paul. Four losses have been recorded between the two properties, with an average payment of $10,610. None are classified as “Severe Repetitive Loss” (SRL). An SRL property is defined as a residential property that is covered under an NFIP flood insurance policy and: That has at least 4 NFIP claim payments (including building and contents) over $5,000 each, and the cumulative amount of such claims payments exceeds $20,000; or For which at least 2 separate claims payments (building payments only) have been made with the cumulative amount of the building portion of such claims exceeding the market value of the building. For both (a) and (b) above, at least 2 of the referenced claims must have occurred within any 10- year period and must be greater than 10 days apart. 3.8.7.3 Environment Detrimental environmental effects of flooding can include soil and bank erosion, bed erosion, siltation or landslides. It can damage vegetation and pollutants carried by flood water can impact on water quality, Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 5 Council Packet Page Number 89 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 habitats and flora and fauna. Flooding also brings with it the potential for contamination that leads to waterborne diseases, as well as hazardous material, raw sewage, and debris contamination. Flood waters often pollute drinking water supplies. When flood waters recede, toxic mold may remain, which can increase incidences of asthma and other respiratory distress. Flooding can however play a beneficial role in natural habitats. 3.8.7.4 County and Community Operations Essential facilities encounter the same impacts as other buildings within the flood boundary: structural failure, extensive water damage to the facility, and loss of facility functionality (i.e. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the community). However, none of Ramsey County’s essential facilities (care facilities, fire stations, police stations and schools) included in the 2019 Hazus analysis are located within the flood boundary. 3.8.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Risk of drowning, injury, or death due to sudden and fast-moving floodwaters. Displacement of residents, leading to temporary or permanent relocation and the loss of personal property. Health risks from contaminated water, including waterborne diseases and hazardous materials. Disruption of daily life, including access to transportation, healthcare, and basic services. Impact on Responders Increased danger to emergency responders operating in hazardous conditions, including swift water, debris, and unstable structures. Overextension of resources and personnel due to the immediate and widespread nature of the response required. Challenges in coordinating rescue and relief efforts, particularly in rapidly changing flood conditions and possible damage to roads, bridges, and other critical infrastructure. Continuity of Operations Disruption of essential services, including power outages, water supply interruption, and communication failures. Challenges in maintaining public safety and order, particularly if critical infrastructure is compromised. Delays in recovery efforts due to damage to roads, bridges, and other transportation networks. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Extensive damage or destruction of homes, businesses, and public buildings due to inundation and debris impact. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 6 Council Packet Page Number 90 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Severe damage to critical infrastructure such as roads, bridges, sewage systems, healthcare, and electrical grids. High costs for repairs, reconstruction, and mitigation efforts, potentially overwhelming local resources. Impact on the Environment Erosion of soil, riverbanks, and landscapes, leading to long-term ecological changes. Pollution of rivers, lakes, and groundwater with debris, chemicals, and sewage from floodwaters. Destruction of natural habitats, negatively affecting wildlife and biodiversity. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Immediate economic losses from damage to commercial properties, agricultural lands, and infrastructure. Long-term economic challenges due to the cost of rebuilding and the potential for reduced investment and tourism. Potential loss of jobs and income. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Erosion of public trust if the flooding is perceived as preventable or if the response is inadequate. Increased scrutiny of floodplain management, land-use planning, and emergency preparedness policies. 3.9 Geologic Hazards 3.9.1 PROFILE A geologic hazard is an adverse geological condition causing damage or loss of property or life. These hazards only become hazards when they impact life or property and are very much a normal part of environmental processes. Ramsey County is at risk of a variety of geologic hazards, the most common of which are: Landslide: The downward movement of a mass of rock, soil, and debris along a slope or cliff face. This movement can range from gradual, slow displacement to rapid, catastrophic events. Landslides are typically triggered by factors such as heavy rainfall, earthquakes, volcanic activity, or human activities that destabilize slopes. Examples of landslides include rock falls and debris flows. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the most common type of landslides in Minnesota are shallow slope failures that occur during heavy rain. Land subsidence: The gradual sinking or settling of the earth's surface, often due to the compaction of underground layers of soil, sediment, or rock. This phenomenon can occur naturally or be exacerbated by human activities such as groundwater extraction, oil and gas extraction, mining, or the drainage of organic soils. Examples of land subsidence include Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 7 Council Packet Page Number 91 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 sinkholes and soil compaction. According to the USGS, more than 80% of the identified subsidence in the United States is a consequence of human impact on subsurface water and is an often-overlooked environmental consequence of land and water-use practices. Increasing development can exacerbate subsidence problems and initiate new ones. 3.9.2 LOCATION Parts of Ramsey County sit on a thick layer of limestone rock that is riddled with small holes and caves, known as karst topography. Its large rivers and hills also create many slopes and cliffs. Heavy surface rains may cause karst landscapes to fail causing landslides or sinkholes. Figure 9 shows karst distribution throughout Minnesota. Figure 9. Karst Distribution in MN Source: www.ramseycounty.us Figure 10 displays unstable soils and bedrock in south Ramsey County. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 8 Council Packet Page Number 92 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 10. Unstable Soils and Bedrock in South Ramsey County Source: Ramsey 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 3.9.3 EXTENT 3.9.3.1 Landslide To determine the extent of a landslide hazard, it is essential to identify affected areas and assess the probability of a landslide occurring within a specified period. Key natural variables that influence landslide activity include soil properties, topographic position and slope, and historical occurrences. Predicting landslides remains challenging, even with ideal conditions and reliable data. Consequently, landslide hazards are often represented by landslide incidence and/or susceptibility, as defined below: Landslide incidence refers to the number of landslides occurring in a specific geographic area. A high incidence indicates that over 15% of the area has experienced landslides. Medium incidence means that 1.5% to 15% of the area has been affected, while low incidence indicates that less than 1.5% of the area has experienced landslides. Landslide susceptibility refers to the likelihood of geologic formations responding to natural or artificial alterations, such as slope cutting, loading, or unusually high precipitation. Areas with a history of numerous landslides are particularly vulnerable to new movements under these conditions. Susceptibility is influenced by slope angle and the underlying geologic material. It identifies potential landslide-prone areas but does not specify a time frame for when a landslide might occur. High, medium, and low susceptibility are categorized using the same percentages as landslide incidence: over 15% for high, 1.5% to 15% for medium, and less than 1.5% for low. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 9 Council Packet Page Number 93 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Common techniques for measuring and monitoring the extent of landslides include field surveys (e.g., geological mapping, slope measurements), remote sensing (e.g., satellite imagery, aerial photography), ground-based monitoring (e.g., GPS, inclinometers, extensometers), and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). 3.9.3.2 Land Subsidence Subsidence can develop gradually or suddenly due to natural processes, such as karst sinkholes in areas with soluble bedrock, or due to human activities. In the U.S., subsidence has affected over 17,000 square miles across 45 states, with annual costs estimated at $125 million. The primary causes include aquifer-system compaction, organic soil drainage, underground mining, hydro compaction, natural compaction, sinkholes, and thawing permafrost. Common techniques for measuring and monitoring the extent of land subsidence include geodetic surveys (e.g., leveling surveys, GPS/GNSS monitoring), remote sensing (e.g., Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar \[InSAR\], satellite imagery), borehole measurements (e.g., extensometers, piezometers), and LiDAR. 3.9.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has a moderate history of impactful geologic incidents. The MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) paper Historical Landslide Inventory for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area was consulted for incident records. Table 14. Significant Geological Hazard Events in Ramsey County, MN Est. Date Type LocationDeaths/ Property Description Injuries Damage May 13, Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Rock and sediment 1879 July 28, Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Unknown 1892 Winter Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Sediment 1969 July 24, LandslideSaint Paulu/ku/kGlacial sediment. This was 1987 a late-night event associated with a slow- moving thunderstorm. April 8, Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Rock. A boulder the size of 2011 two minivans struck and demolished a local bakery. May 1, Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Glacial sediment and fill 2011 May 22, Landslide Saint Paul 2/4 u/k Rock and sediment. A 2013 rockslide killed two and injured two fourth graders at Lilydale Regional Park. Two firefighters were also Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 10 Council Packet Page Number 94 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Est. Date Type LocationDeaths/ Property Description Injuries Damage injured in the response. June 19, Landslide Saint Paul u/k u/k Sediment. Heavy rainfall 2014 caused a landslide beneath a hospital at the University of Minnesota. April 28, Landslide Saint Paul 0/0 $766k An estimated 400,000 2018 pounds of rock and soil came loose on the bluff to cover Wabasha Street between Plato Boulevard and Cesar Chavez Street. 9 -- --2/4 $766,000 -- Significant total Incidents claimed Sources: MN DNR and 2019 Ramsey MHMP During Planning Meeting #2, members of the LPT noted a landslide in Gem Lake that caused disruption to nearby railroad tracks, although further research didn’t find any written record of it. 3.9.5 PROBABILITY Geologic hazard incidents are an occasional occurrence within Ramsey County. Six significant incidents have occurred since 1970, giving a probability of approximately an 11% chance of a significant geologic hazard incident occurring within any given year. During Planning Meeting #2, the LPT noted that mitigation of geologic hazard risks has been implemented across the county; as mitigation continues, probability of incidents will decrease. 3.9.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change can significantly influence geologic hazards in Rasmey County through various mechanisms. Here are some key impacts: Increased Frequency of Heavy Rainfall: More intense and frequent heavy rainfall can saturate soils, increasing the likelihood of landslides, especially in areas with steep slopes or unstable terrain. It can also lead to more frequent and severe flooding, which can erode riverbanks and destabilize the ground, potentially triggering landslides and soil erosion. Heavy rains in Minnesota are now more frequent and intense than ever recorded. Long-term observation sites have shown significant increases in 1-inch and 3-inch rainfalls, as well as the heaviest annual rainfall events. Since 2000, the state has also experienced a notable rise in widespread extreme rainstorms. Rainfalls that historically ranked in the top 2% are becoming more common. Climate projections suggest that these heavy rains will continue to increase in the future. Temperature Extremes: Increased variability in temperatures can lead to more frequent freeze- thaw cycles, which can cause soil and rock to expand and contract. This process can weaken slopes and contribute to landslides and rockfalls. Minnesota has warmed by 3.0°F between 1895 and 2020, with the most dramatic changes occurring in recent decades. Since 1970, nearly every Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 11 Council Packet Page Number 95 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 year has been warmer than the 20th-century average. Each of the top 10 warmest years on record occurred between 1998 and 2020. These warming trends are expected to continue through the 21st century. Drought: Extended periods of drought can dry out soils, making them more susceptible to erosion when rains do return. This can lead to a loss of fertile topsoil and increased sediment in waterways. Groundwater depletion during droughts can cause land subsidence, particularly in areas where groundwater is heavily relied upon for agriculture and other uses. Changes in Vegetation: Vegetation helps to stabilize slopes by binding soil with roots. Changes in vegetation patterns due to climate change, such as increased prevalence of invasive species or loss of native plants, can reduce slope stability and increase landslide risk. Northern tree species in Minnesota, such as paper birch, quaking aspen, balsam fir, and black spruce, may begin to decline and shift further north. In their place, warmer-climate species like maples, oaks, and hickories could become more prevalent. These shifts in tree cover will also bring changes to soil habitats. By understanding these impacts, communities in the Ramsey County can develop more effective strategies for mitigating the risks associated with geologic hazards in the context of a changing climate. 3.9.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.9.7.1 People People living in areas with steep terrain are at greater risk of landslides, and those living in floodplains and river valleys may experience greater incidences of flooding and erosion, leading to increased risk of land subsidence and landslides. Additionally, populations in older cities and towns with aging infrastructure are more susceptible to damage from geologic hazards. Similarly, those living in affordable housing may be located in areas more prone to geologic hazards and may be less structurally resilient. 3.9.7.2 Property In residential and commercial areas, houses and critical infrastructure built on or near steep slopes are vulnerable to landslides, especially during periods of heavy rainfall or rapid snowmelt. Subdivisions built on filled land or areas with unstable soils may be prone to over time. Infrastructure like roads and highways traversing hilly or unstable terrain are susceptible to landslides and slope failures, as are structures spanning rivers or valleys which can be impacted by erosion and subsidence, affecting stability and safety. Geologic hazards can threaten underground infrastructure such as pipelines for water, wastewater, gas, and electricity, as well as communication cables. 3.9.7.3 Environment Landslides and subsidence can fragment habitats and disrupt ecosystems, affecting wildlife and plant communities. Sedimentation from landslides can degrade water quality in rivers, lakes, and streams, impacting aquatic ecosystems and drinking water sources. Finally, erosion and sedimentation can reduce soil fertility and agricultural productivity, affecting food security and livelihoods. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 12 Council Packet Page Number 96 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.9.7.4 County and Community Operations Roads, bridges, and railways are essential for transporting goods and people. Landslides and land subsidence can block roads or damage bridges, disrupting transportation and emergency response efforts. Utility and communication system grids can be damaged, leading to service interruptions and potentially affecting public health and safety. 3.9.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Risk of injuries or fatalities from sudden landslides or gradual subsidence leading to ground collapse. Evacuation and temporary relocation of residents from affected areas. Mental health impacts from displacement and trauma; physical health risks from injuries or exposure to hazardous conditions. Impact on Responders Difficult terrain and unstable ground conditions hindering emergency response efforts. Increased risk to responders working in unstable areas prone to further landslides or subsidence. Need for specialized equipment and training to safely conduct rescue and recovery operations. Impact on Continuity of Operations Disruption to government services and operations located in or near affected areas. Potential interruption of critical infrastructure systems, including utilities and transportation networks, if located in landslide or subsidence zones. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Structural damage or total destruction of buildings located in landslide or subsidence zones. Damage to schools, hospitals, and other public facilities, necessitating repairs or reconstruction. Road closures, rail line disruptions, and damage to bridges affecting mobility and logistics. Damage to water, gas, and electricity lines, leading to service outages and potential hazards. Impact on the Environment Disruption to local ecosystems and wildlife habitats due to ground movement and landscape alteration. Increased erosion, sedimentation of water bodies, and potential contamination from disrupted underground utilities. Loss of vegetation cover contributing to further erosion and destabilization of slopes. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 13 Council Packet Page Number 97 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Decrease in property values in high-risk areas, impacting homeowners and local tax revenue. Disruption to local businesses, leading to financial losses, job displacement, and reduced economic activity. Significant expenses for rebuilding and repairing damaged infrastructure and properties. Increased insurance premiums and potential difficulty in obtaining coverage for properties in high-risk zones. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Public perception of the government's ability to manage and mitigate geologic hazards effectively. Importance of clear and timely communication with the public regarding risks, mitigation measures, and response efforts. Potential for increased scrutiny of government officials and policies, leading to political challenges or changes in leadership. 3.10Hazardous Materials 3.10.1 PROFILE Materials considered hazardous are commonly and safely used across communities daily. When a chemical or other substance that may harm health or the environment has been released into the air, water or ground, it is considered a hazardous materials incident. Incidents can occur when materials are being produced, stored, transported, used, or disposed of. Most hazardous incidents are quickly, easily and safely contained; however, potential exists for longer lasting and harmful incidents. This chapter focuses on the following types of incidents: Spills: Accidental release of hazardous substances can lead to contamination of soil, water, and air. Pipelines: Leaks or ruptures in pipelines can release hazardous materials into the environment. Trucking: Transportation accidents involving trucks can result in the release of hazardous cargoes. Railways: Train derailments or collisions can lead to significant spills of hazardous materials. 3.10.2 LOCATION Due to the unexpected nature of a hazardous materials event, the entirety of Ramsey County would be considered at risk for these types of events. Hazardous materials incidents are classified as either fixed incidents or mobile incidents. Approximately 80%-90% of incidents occur at fixed sites, such as factories and storage facilities. Impacts are typically limited to the site itself, and the immediate surrounding area. Ramsey County is home to a number of chemical plants and facilities, ranging from manufacturing to processing and distribution of chemicals, including 3M Company Headquarters in Maplewood, Ecolab Inc. in Saint Paul, and HB Fuller, located in Vadnais Heights. There are also several large waste and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 14 Council Packet Page Number 98 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 recycling facilities in the county which handle various types of waste, including hazardous materials. The notable facilities include the Ramsey County Recycling and Energy Center and the Ramsey County Household Hazardous Waste Facility. Other adjacent facilities and private waste management companies also pose hazardous materials risks. Ramsey County is home to several major including on the University of Minnesota, Saint Paul Campus, 3M Company, MN Department of Public Health Laboratory, and EcoLab. Hospitals and healthcare facilities can also be sites for hazardous materials incidents. A number of hospitals and health care facilities located within Ramsey County handle materials as part of their regular operations. The remainder of incidents occur while a material is in transit. These incidents can occur on major roadways, railways, or in pipelines. The following are the most likely locations for mobile accidents to occur within the county: Transportation Routes o Roadways – Ramsey County is served by a number of major roadways including Interstates 94 (I-94), 35E (I35E), and 694 (I-694); US Highways 52 and 61; and MN State Highways 36 (MN-36), 51 (MN-51), and 280 (MN-280). Additionally, there are a number of major county roads that transverse the region as well. o Intersections/Interchanges – Major intersections/interchanges in Ramsey County include I-94 and I-35E, I-94 and MN-280, and I-694 and I-35E. Other significant urban and suburban intersections are located across the county as well. o Bridges and Overpasses – Ramsey County has a number of key bridges and overpasses including a number that span the Mississippi River and interstate and highway overpasses. o Railroads – Ramsey County is a significant hub for rail transportation in the region, with BNSF Railway, Union Pacific Railroad, Canadian Pacific Railway, and Amtrak providing freight and passenger services with the county. o Airports – While the major airport that services Ramsey County (Minneapolis – Saint Paul International Airport (MSP)) is located in adjacent Hennepin County, portions of Ramsey County will be in the flight path for MSP. In addition, there are two smaller airports located within the County: Saint Paul Downtown Airport (STP) and Lake Elmo Airport. Pipelines o Oil and Gas Pipelines – Oil and gas pipelines are present in Ramsey County, including natural gas and petroleum products, such as gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. 3.10.3 EXTENT The extent of a hazardous material event can vary widely depending on several factors including physical area affected, environmental impact, population affected, duration, severity of health risks, economic impact, infrastructure affected, response required, and legal and regulatory implications. Hazardous materials are organized into nine classes: Class 1: Explosives Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 15 Council Packet Page Number 99 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Class 2: Gases Class 3: Flammable Liquids Class 4: Flammable Solids Class 5: Oxidizer Class 6: Poisonous Materials Class 7: Radioactive Materials Class 8: Corrosive Materials Class 9: Miscellaneous Hazardous Materials Figure 11. Hazardous Materials Classes Source: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 3.10.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has experienced several notable hazardous materials incidents in recent years, including: University Avenue Chemical Spill. Occurring in Saint Paul in November 1992. A tanker truck carrying hazardous chemicals overturned on University Avenue, causing a significant spill of industrial solvents. This led to an evacuation of nearby businesses and residents, traffic disruption, and road closures for several hours. The spill was contained and cleaned but did pose a risk to public health and the environment. H.B. Fuller Plant Fire (2002). Occurring in June 2002 at the H.B. Fuller Company plant in Vadnais Heights. A fire broke out at the H.B. Fuller adhesive manufacturing plant, causing the release of hazardous fumes and chemicals. This led to the evacuation of employees and nearby residents Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 16 Council Packet Page Number 100 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 due to the risk of toxic smoke inhalation, resulting in significant property damage and concerns about air quality. Saint Paul Riverfront Chemical Leak. Occurring in May 2007 in the riverfront industrial area in Saint Paul. A leak of anhydrous ammonia occurred at an industrial facility near the Mississippi River. This release led to the evacuation of nearby residents and workers and raised concerns about industrial safety and environmental protection along the riverfront. BNSF Railway Chemical Spill. Occurring in September 2010 at the BNSF Railway yard, Saint Paul. A derailment of a train carrying hazardous materials occurred at the BNSF Railway yard, causing a spill of chemicals, including sulfuric acid. This spill required the evacuation of the immediate area and the deployment of hazmat teams to contain and clean up the hazardous substances. The incident disrupted rail operations and posed a risk to public health and the environment, prompting concerns about potential groundwater contamination and air quality. Energy Park Drive Industrial Fire. Occurring in July 2015, in the industrial area along Energy Park Drive, Saint Paul. A fire at an industrial facility led to the release of hazardous smoke and chemicals, prompting the evacuation of workers and nearby residents. The incident caused significant property damage and raised concerns about industrial safety and emergency preparedness. A search was run for incidents recorded by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Between 1980 and August 2024, the PHMSA database records 1,828 separate mobile hazardous materials incidents both large and small occurring in the county. Of these, 1,692 occurred on a highway, 95 occurred on rail lines, 39 occurred in the air, and one occurred on the water. 3.10.5 PROBABILITY Determining the exact probability of a hazardous materials incident is challenging due to the variability of factors involved. Smaller hazardous materials incidents are likely to occur frequently due to the large volume of hazardous materials in the county, but a widespread event is less likely to occur due to the controls and regulations in place at larger facilities. The following considerations may influence the likelihood of such incidents: Presence of industrial facilities, including chemical plants and refineries Major transportation routes, such as highways, railways, and waterways Population density in urban areas It is safe to say that minor hazardous materials incidents are a relatively routine occurrence across the county. Large-scale hazardous materials incidents are much rarer. 3.10.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 17 Council Packet Page Number 101 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Climate change has the potential to increase the number of hazardous materials incidents, due to changes in population, environment, and production capacity. It is also expected that climate change impacts may exacerbate the impacts of the incidents themselves, depending on the weather, location and type of material. 3.10.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Vulnerability in a hazardous materials incident is highly contingent on the location of the incident and the substance released. 3.10.7.1 People Health Risks - Hazardous materials can be toxic, flammable, corrosive, or reactive, posing immediate and long-term health risks. Hazardous materials vary greatly in the types of health risks they pose to humans, including the following potential health risks from hazardous materials: thermal, radiological, asphyxiation, chemical, etiological, or mechanical (TRACEM). Population Density – Areas with high population density, including much of Ramsey County, can increase the number of people potentially impacted by a hazardous material incident. Proximity to Facilities – Communities located near industrial plants, chemical storage facilities, transportation routes, or waste disposal sites are at a greater risk of exposure. There are a significant number of transportation routes (both rail and road) that traverse the county, on which hazardous materials are carried every day. The City of Roseville has several fuel tank facilities, with approximately 370 semi-trucks, carrying hazardous materials, entering and exiting on a daily basis. 3.10.7.2 Property Damage to infrastructure – Hazardous materials can cause significant damage to buildings, roads, bridges, and other infrastructure. Corrosive chemicals can degrade materials, and explosions and fires can cause widespread damage. Economic Costs – the economic impact of hazardous materials incidents can be substantial, including cleanup, property devaluation, and business interruptions. Long-term contamination – Contamination can persist in buildings and infrastructure, rendering them unusable or requiring costs decontamination or demolition efforts. 3.10.7.3 Environment Water contamination – Hazardous materials can seep into groundwater or run off into rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, contaminating drinking water and impacting aquatic ecosystems. Jurisdictions, such as Gem Lake, utilize a well water infrastructure, and spills impacting groundwater could have significant impacts to drinking water. Soil degradation – Hazardous material incidents can lead to soil contamination which can affect plant growth and soil health. Contaminants can persist in the soil for long periods of time which can make land unsuitable for habitation and/or agriculture. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 18 Council Packet Page Number 102 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Air pollution – Hazardous gases or particulates can be released into the air. These can impact air quality and pose respiratory risks for humans and animals. Ecosystem disruption – Toxic substances can disrupt ecosystems, reduce biodiversity, and affect food chain, possibly causing long-term ecological imbalances. 3.10.7.4 County and Community Operations A hazardous materials incident can have a significant impact on a community. The impacts can be immediate, short-term, and long-term, affecting various aspects of the community including health, environmental, economy, and social well-being. 3.10.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Immediate and long-term health risks, including exposure to toxic substances, chemical burns, respiratory issues, or poisoning. Potential for widespread panic or fear due to the nature of the hazardous material. Evacuation of affected areas, leading to temporary displacement and disruption of daily life. Impact on Responders High risk of exposure to hazardous materials, requiring specialized protective equipment and training. Challenges in managing the scene, including containment, decontamination, and medical treatment. Potential injuries or fatalities among responders due to the dangerous nature of the incident. Strain on emergency response resources, including medical facilities, hazmat teams, and fire services. Continuity of Operations Disruption of critical services, including transportation, healthcare, and public utilities, due to contamination or evacuation. Potential shutdown of government buildings or facilities in the affected area, delaying administrative functions. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Contamination of buildings, public spaces, and infrastructure, leading to costly cleanup and decontamination efforts. Potential destruction or long-term damage to property due to explosions, fires, or chemical corrosion. Temporary or permanent closure of affected facilities, impacting businesses, schools, and public services. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 19 Council Packet Page Number 103 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Long-term implications for infrastructure integrity if materials seep into soil, groundwater, or air systems. Impact on the Environment Contamination of air, water, and soil, potentially affecting large areas and leading to short- and long-term ecological damage. Destruction of natural habitats, with harmful effects on wildlife and plant life. Challenges in restoring affected environments, with potential for lasting degradation of ecosystems. Risk of bioaccumulation of hazardous substances in the food chain, affecting both wildlife and human populations. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Significant economic losses due to business closures, property damage, and costs associated with cleanup and decontamination. Potential long-term economic downturn if the incident affects key industries in the region. Increased healthcare costs due to treatment of affected individuals and long-term health monitoring. Potential decrease in property values and attractiveness of the area for investment or development. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Erosion of public trust if the incident is perceived as preventable or if the response is seen as inadequate. Increased scrutiny and criticism of regulatory and oversight agencies responsible for hazardous materials management. Pressure to improve safety regulations, emergency response capabilities, and communication strategies to prevent future incidents. 3.11Summer Weather Hazards 3.11.1 PROFILE The summer weather hazards chapter encompasses natural weather hazards most likely to occur in the spring and summer months. The most common types of summer weather hazards experienced in Ramsey County are described below. Extreme heat: The NWS does not have a set definition for extreme heat, but instead calibrates the point at which forecasters warn residents based on the region's climate. For central states, including Minnesota, Heat Advisories are issued when the heat index exceeds 100 degrees. Excessive Heat Warnings are issued when the heat index exceeds 105 degrees. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 20 Council Packet Page Number 104 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Heatwave: Heatwaves are periods of abnormally hot weather generally lasting more than two days. Heat waves can occur with or without high humidity. Hail: Hail forms inside a thunderstorm or other storms with strong updrafts of warm air and downdrafts of cold water. If a water droplet is picked up by the updrafts, it can be carried well above the freezing level. Water droplets freeze when temperatures reach 32 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) or colder. As the frozen droplet begins to fall, it may thaw as it moves into warmer air toward the bottom of the thunderstorm. However, the droplet may be picked up again by another updraft and carried back into the cold air and refreeze. With each trip above and below the freezing level, the frozen droplet adds another layer of ice. The frozen droplet, with many layers of ice, falls to the ground as hail. Most hail is small and typically less than two inches in diameter. Lightning: Lightning is a bright flash of electrical energy produced by a thunderstorm. All thunderstorms produce lightning and are very dangerous. Lightning ranks as one of the top weather killers in the U.S., where an average of 300 people are injured and 80 are killed each year. Lightning can occur anywhere there is a thunderstorm, often strikes outside the heavy rain in a thunderstorm, and may occur as far as 10 miles away from any rainfall. Note that a single summer weather event may include one or more of these hazards. 3.11.2 LOCATION All communities within Ramsey County are vulnerable to summer weather. 3.11.3 EXTENT 3.11.3.1 Extreme Heat and Heatwaves Each NWS Forecast Office issues heat-related alerts as needed. Local offices often work with partners to decide when to issue an alert for a specific area. The Heat Index is a measure of how hot it feels when factoring in the relative humidity at a given location. This can be used as a decision-making tool when issuing heat-related products. The Heat Index is provided as Figure 12. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 21 Council Packet Page Number 105 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 12. Heat Index Source: www.weather.gov Heat-related products are described in Table 15. Table 15. NWS Heat-Related Products ProductDescription Excessive Heat Warning—Take An Excessive Heat Warning is issued within 12 hours of the Action! onset of extremely dangerous heat conditions. The general rule of thumb for this Warning is when the maximum heat index temperature is expected to be 105° or higher for at least 2 days and nighttime air temperatures will not drop below 75°; however, these criteria vary across the country, especially for areas not used to extreme heat conditions. If you don't take precautions immediately when conditions are extreme, you may become seriously ill or even die. Excessive Heat Watches—Be Heat watches are issued when conditions are favorable for Prepared! an excessive heat event in the next 24 to 72 hours. A Watch is used when the risk of a heat wave has increased but its occurrence and timing is still uncertain. Heat Advisory—Take Action! A Heat Advisory is issued within 12 hours of the onset of extremely dangerous heat conditions. The general rule of thumb for this Advisory is when the maximum heat index temperature is expected to be 100° or higher for at least 2 days, and nighttime air temperatures will not drop below 75°; however, these criteria vary across the country, especially for areas that are not used to dangerous heat Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 22 Council Packet Page Number 106 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 conditions. Take precautions to avoid heat illness. If you don't take precautions, you may become seriously ill or even die. Excessive Heat Outlooks—Be Aware!The outlooks are issued when the potential exists for an excessive heat event in the next 3-7 days. An Outlook provides information to those who need considerable lead timeto prepare for the event. Source: www.weather.gov 3.11.3.2 Hail Hail size typically refers to the diameter of the hailstones. Warnings and reports may report hail size through comparisons with real-world objects that correspond to certain diameters. To be considered severe, hail stones must be at least 1 inch in diameter. Hail naming convention, damage estimate, description, and size are provided in Table 16. Table 16. Hail Descriptions and Damage Estimates Hail NameDamage Description Diameter (in.) Small Hail Unlikely Pea 0.25 Marble or Mothball 0.50 Penny or Dime 0.75 Nickel 0.88 Large HailMinor damage Quarter 1.00 Half Dollar 1.25 Walnut or Ping Pong Ball 1.50 Golf ball 1.75 Very Large Hail Moderate damage Hen's Egg2.00 Tennis Ball 2.50 Baseball 2.75 Giant Hail Major damage Teacup 3.00 Grapefruit 4.00 Softball 4.50 Source: www.weather.gov 3.11.3.3 Lightning The threat of lightning is largely based on the likelihood that cloud-to-ground lightning (CG) from thunderstorms will occur combined with the anticipated flash rate. With CG lightning, every strike is potentially lethal and has the potential to contribute to other hazards such as wildfire. Flash rate is defined in Table 17. Table 17. CG Lightning Flash Rate Term Description Occasional CG lightning at the rate of 1 to 3 flashes per minute (about 5 to 15 flashes per 5 minutes) associated with a given lightning storm. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 23 Council Packet Page Number 107 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Frequent CG lightning at the rate of 4 to 11 flashes per minute (about 20 to 55 flashes per 5 minutes) associated with a given lightning storm. ExcessiveCG lightning rate of 12 flashes or more per minute (about 60 flashes or more per 5 minutes) and is nearly continuous associated with a given lightning storm. Source: www.weather.gov Lightning risk is also defined as low, moderate, or high as shown in Table 18. Table 18. Lightning Risk LevelDefinition Low Risk Atmospheric conditions do not support frequent cloud-to-ground lightning strikes. Moderate Risk Thunderstorms are forecast to be scattered in coverage (30-50% chance). Atmospheric conditions support frequent cloud-to-ground lightning strikes. High Risk Thunderstorms are forecast to be numerous or widespread in coverage (60- 100% chance). Atmospheric conditions support continuous and intense cloud-to-ground lightning strikes. Source: www.weather.gov 3.11.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has a significant history of damaging windstorms and tornadoes. The National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Storm Events Database was consulted for incident records. According to NCEI records, there have been 243 significant summer weather incidents reported between 1950 and July 2024. This dataset recorded five deaths and two injuries since 1950. Notable summer weather hazard incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 19. Table 19. Notable Summer Weather Hazard Incidents in Ramsey County, MN Date Type Deaths/ Property Description Injuries Damage August 9, Lightning 1/0None One man died because of a lightning strike 1998 reported while under a tree. May 1, 2001 Hail0/0$2M Numerous vehicles and buildings were damaged. June 7, 2005 Lightning 0/0None Lightning struck a home on Timberline Trail. reported The northwest corner of the home caught fire and sheetrock fell on a person lying in bed. August 8, Lightning 0/0None Lightning struck a home and a nearby tree on 2005 reported Whitaker Street. The bolt that struck the home damaged the electrical equipment inside. The bolt that struck the tree caused the tree to split in two, and one of the pieces fell through a window. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 24 Council Packet Page Number 108 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Date Type Deaths/ Property Description Injuries Damage July 24, 2009Hail0/0$15kA strong cold front moved through the region Friday morning and generated a line of strong to severe thunderstorms that affected areas from far east central Minnesota, into west central Wisconsin. Several reports of golf ball size hail were observed in the east metro of the Twin Cities. September Hail0/0$5M Several reports of large hail, up to the size of 21, 2010 half dollars, occurred from the Highland Park area of Saint Paul, northeast across the north side of the city. August 25, Excessive 0/216None Heat indices of 105° F occurred during the 2013 Heat reported Minnesota State Fair. 216 people were treated at State Fair medical aid stations for heat-related illnesses. Of those 216, 10 were transported to area hospitals. Minneapolis schools also canceled outdoor athletic practices during this period of extreme heat. July 2015 Extreme 0/0None Several observations across Ramsey County Heat reported measured heat indices over 105° F for two days in a row. The highest heat index value was 116° F. 8 Significant - 1/216$7,015,000 -- Incidents total claimed Sources: NCDC; 2019 Ramsey MHMP 3.11.5 PROBABILITY Summer weather hazards are an annual occurrence and are likely to occur each year. Eight significant summer weather incidents have occurred since 1970, giving a probability of approximately a 14.5% chance of a significant summer weather incident occurring within any given year. 3.11.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change is expected to have dramatic impacts on weather patterns in Minnesota. These include more extreme weather patterns, including increased periods of extreme heat, enhanced lightning activity, changes in hail patterns and more intense storms. Climate change could have the following impacts: Increased Extreme Heat: This includes more frequent and severe heatwaves, higher average summer temperatures, and longer duration of hot spells. Minnesota is getting warmer, especially winter nights in the northern parts of the state. Daily average minimum temperatures during winter (Dec-Feb) have increased 4.9 degrees in southern Minnesota. Enhanced Lightning Activity: Increased atmospheric instability may lead to more thunderstorms, with higher temperatures and humidity levels contributing to more frequent lightning strikes. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 25 Council Packet Page Number 109 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Changes in Hail Patterns: There is the potential for increase in the size and frequency of hail due to more intense thunderstorms, as well as shifts in the geographic distribution of hailstorms. More Intense Storms: Greater frequency of severe thunderstorms with high winds and heavy rainfall and subsequent increased risk of flash flooding. Health Risks: Extreme heat can lead to increased heat-related illnesses and mortality and a higher risk of respiratory problems due to poor air quality. Higher temperatures can exacerbate air quality issues, leading to more smog and ground-level ozone. Economic Costs: Rising temperatures create a greater demand for energy to cool homes and businesses, and there may be increased costs for repairing damage from severe weather incidents. Ecosystem impacts can have trickle down effects on related industries such as fishing and tourism. Likewise, agricultural impacts affect the agricultural and farming sectors. Ecosystem Disruptions: Increased heat, along with more frequent, intense, and prolonged storms, may alter plant and animal behavior and distribution by stressing native species and ecosystems. Over the past 50 years, Minnesota lakes have lost an average of 10 to 14 days of ice cover, and July-August water temperatures have risen by 3.0 to 3.9°F, impacting lake and fish health. Algae blooms, exacerbated by warmer water, can deplete oxygen levels, suffocating fish, even those species like bass that typically thrive in warmer conditions. Northern tree species such as paper birch, quaking aspen, balsam fir, and black spruce may decline and migrate further north, while warmer-climate species like maples, oaks, and hickories could take their place. These shifts in tree cover will also lead to changes in wildlife and soil habitats. While the exact relationship between climate change and summer weather is complex and still under active research, the evidence suggests that climate change is likely to impact the frequency, intensity, and distribution of summer weather hazards in the Midwest. Improved understanding and modeling of these changes are essential for developing effective mitigation and adaptation strategies. 3.11.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.11.7.1 People Extreme heat poses serious health risks, particularly for the elderly, children, and those with pre-existing health conditions, as well as people without access to air conditioning. Extreme heat is the leading weather-related killer in the United States, killing more people than other types of extreme weather. Changing temperatures bring illnesses related to frequency and severity of allergic illnesses (e.g., asthma and hay fever). Prolonged heatwaves can lead to heat exhaustion, heatstroke, and increased mortality rates. During the second planning meeting, attendees noted that in Ramsey County, many of the recent immigrants are not used to hotter weather and often live many people to a home, often without air conditioning. Hailstorms, often accompanying severe thunderstorms, can cause significant injury to individuals caught outside and disrupt daily activities. Lightning presents another serious threat, with the potential to cause direct injuries or fatalities and ignite fires, posing additional risks to both urban and rural communities. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 26 Council Packet Page Number 110 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.11.7.2 Property Extreme heat can cause asphalt and concrete to buckle, strain power grids due to increased air conditioning usage, and degrade building materials, leading to higher maintenance and repair costs. Hailstorms pose a significant threat to homes, vehicles, and agricultural assets, often resulting in shattered windows, damaged roofs, and destroyed crops. These storms can also disrupt transportation networks and necessitate costly repairs. Lightning strikes can cause power outages, fires, and severe damage to electrical and communication systems. 3.11.7.3 Environment The environment in the Midwest is particularly vulnerable to summer weather hazards such as extreme heat, hail, and lightning. Extreme heat can lead to drought conditions, stressing water resources, and reducing soil moisture, which negatively impacts plant and animal life. Prolonged high temperatures can also alter ecosystems, driving some species to migrate while threatening others that cannot adapt quickly enough. Hailstorms can cause significant physical damage to vegetation, strip leaves from trees, and destroy crops, disrupting local ecosystems and agricultural productivity. Lightning, besides posing a direct threat to wildlife, can ignite wildfires, which rapidly spread and devastate large areas of forest and grassland, leading to habitat loss and long-term ecological shifts. These summer weather hazards collectively strain the resilience of the Midwest's natural environment, disrupt the balance of local ecosystems, and contribute to biodiversity loss. 3.11.7.4 County and Community Operations Government and community operations in the Midwest are significantly vulnerable to summer weather hazards such as extreme heat, hail, and lightning. Extreme heat can overwhelm public health systems with heat-related illnesses and fatalities, strain energy resources due to increased air conditioning use, and disrupt daily operations in schools, government buildings, and public transportation. Hailstorms can cause extensive damage to public infrastructure necessitating costly repairs and diverting funds from other essential services. Lightning can disrupt power and communication networks, leading to outages that hinder emergency response efforts and critical services. These disruptions can impede the delivery of essential services, compromise public safety, and place a significant financial burden on local governments. The number of languages spoken in the county makes public messaging difficult. 3.11.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Increased risk of heat-related illnesses and fatalities, especially among vulnerable populations (elderly, children, and those with pre-existing health conditions). Potential overburdening of healthcare facilities due to heat-related emergencies. Disruption of daily activities and potential evacuation of individuals from areas without adequate cooling facilities. Extreme heat creates heat-related physical stress on the population and is exacerbated in the metropolitan areas where greater amounts of heat-absorbing surfaces (e.g., asphalt and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 27 Council Packet Page Number 111 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 concrete) trap heat and emit higher temperatures throughout the night. Injuries from hailstones or lightning, particularly if individuals are caught outdoors. Damage to personal vehicles and homes leading to financial strain on households. Risk of lightning strikes causing injuries or fatalities to individuals outdoors. Potential for lightning-induced fires affecting residential areas and leading to evacuations. Impact on Responders Increased risk of heat exhaustion, heatstroke, and hail or lightning strikes among emergency responders. Need for additional resources and protocols to ensure responder safety in high temperatures. Impact on Continuity of Operations Potential for power outages due to increased demand for electricity (air conditioning). Need for implementation of heat emergency plans and continuity strategies. Possible damage to government buildings, vehicles, and communication systems. Disruption of essential services and potential delays in government response and recovery efforts. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Strain on power grids and potential infrastructure failures due to high heat. Significant damage to buildings, vehicles, and outdoor infrastructure (e.g., traffic signals, power lines) duet to hail or lightning. Damage to electrical systems, communication networks, and buildings due to lightning. Impact on the Environment Stress on local ecosystems and wildlife, particularly aquatic systems due to higher water temperatures. Damage to crops and natural vegetation due to hail. Forest and grass fires due leading to habitat destruction and air quality issues due to lightning. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Potential impacts on agriculture and tourism sectors. Potential disruptions to businesses, leading to loss of revenue and jobs. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Public dissatisfaction if government response is perceived as inadequate, particularly in providing cooling centers and emergency services. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 28 Council Packet Page Number 112 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.12Tornado and Windstorm 3.12.1PROFILE High winds can be produced during severe thunderstorms, with other strong weather systems, or by flow down a mountain. There are several types of damaging winds possible in Minnesota: Straight-line winds describe any thunderstorm wind that is not associated with rotation and is used mainly to differentiate from tornadic winds. A downdraft is a small-scale column of air that rapidly sinks toward the ground. A downburst is the general term used to broadly describe macro and microbursts. Downburst is the general term for all localized strong wind events that are caused by a strong downdraft within a thunderstorm, while microburst simply refers to an especially small downburst that is less than 4 km across. A gust front is the leading edge of rain-cooled air that clashes with warmer thunderstorm inflow. Gust fronts are characterized by a wind shift, temperature drop, and gusty winds out ahead of a thunderstorm. Sometimes the winds push up air above them, forming a shelf cloud or detached roll cloud. A derecho is a widespread, long-lived windstorm that is associated with a band of rapidly moving showers or thunderstorms. A typical derecho consists of numerous microbursts, downbursts, and downburst clusters. By definition, if the wind damage swath extends more than 240 miles (about 400 kilometers) and includes wind gusts of at least 58 mph (93 km/h) or greater along most of its length, then the event may be classified as a derecho. A haboob is a wall of dust that is pushed out along the ground from a thunderstorm downdraft at high speeds. Tornadoes are defined as violently rotating columns of air extending from thunderstorms to the ground, with wind speeds between 40-300 mph. They develop under 3 scenarios: (1) along a squall line; (2) in connection with thunderstorm squall lines during hot, humid weather; and (3) in the outer portion of a tropical cyclone. Funnel clouds are rotating columns of air not in contact with the ground; however, the column of air can reach the ground very quickly and become a tornado. 3.12.2 LOCATION All communities within Ramsey County are vulnerable to windstorms and tornadoes. Minnesota lies along the northern border of Tornado Alley, a loosely defined area first described in 1952 in the central United States where tornadoes are more likely to occur than in other parts of the continent. Interestingly, tornado activity has been shifting away from the Great Plains and toward the Midwestern and Southeast U.S. according to a report published in the April 2024 issue of the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 29 Council Packet Page Number 113 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Figure 13. Tornado Alley Source: Encyclopedia Britannica 3.12.3 EXTENT Winds are classified by the NWS using the categories shown in Table 20. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 30 Council Packet Page Number 114 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Table 20. Wind Speed Classifications Description Speed Strong Wind Gusts Between 39 mph and 57 mph Damaging Wind Gusts Between 58 mph and 74 mph causing minor damage Very Damaging Wind Gusts Between 75 mph and 91 mph causing moderate damage Violent Wind Gusts Greater than 92 mph causing major damage Source: National Weather Service Since 2007, tornado strength in the United States has been ranked based on the Enhanced Fujita scale (EF scale), replacing the Fujita scale introduced in 1971. The EF scale, shown in Table 21 uses similar principles to the Fujita scale, with 6 categories from 0-5, based on wind estimates and damage caused by the tornado. The EF Scale is used extensively by the NWS in investigating tornadoes (all tornadoes are now assigned an EF Scale number), and by engineers in correlating damage to buildings and techniques with different wind speeds caused by tornadoes. It uses three-second gusts estimated at the point of damage based on a judgment of damage. When tornado-related damage is surveyed, it is compared to a list of Damage Indicators (DIs) and Degrees of Damage (DoD) which help estimate better the range of wind speeds the tornado likely produced. Each damage indicator is rated on a scale of 1-8 DoD. From that, a rating (from EF0 to EF5) is assigned. Table 21. Enhance Fujita Scale EF Rating 3 Second Gust (mph) Description 0 65-85Light damage. Some damage to chimneys; branches broken off trees; shallow-rooted trees pushed over; sign boards damaged. 1 86-110Moderate damage. Peels surface off roofs; mobile homes pushed off foundations or overturned; moving autos blown off roads. 2 111-135Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses; mobile homes demolished; boxcars overturned; large trees snapped or uprooted; light-object missiles generated; cars lifted off ground. 3 136-165Severe damage. Roofs and some walls torn off well- constructed houses; trains overturned; most trees in forest uprooted; heavy cars lifted off the ground and thrown. 4 166-200Devastating damage. Well-constructed houses leveled; structures with weak foundations blown away some distance; cars thrown, and large missiles generated. 5 200+ Incredible damage. Strong frame houses leveled off foundations and swept away; automobile-sized missiles fly through the air in excess of 100 meters (109 yds); trees debarked; incredible phenomena will occur. Source: National Weather Service Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 31 Council Packet Page Number 115 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.12.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has a significant history of damaging windstorms and tornadoes. The NCEI Storm Events Database was consulted for incident records. 3.12.4.1 Windstorm History According to NCEI records, there have been 168 significant non-tornadic windstorm incidents reported between 1950 and July 2024, with wind speeds of up to 99 mph. These winds can inflict damage to buildings and in some cases, overturn high-profile vehicles. This dataset recorded zero deaths, 11 injuries, and over $25 million in property damage since 1950. Notable non-tornadic windstorm incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 22. Table 22. Notable Non-Tornadic Windstorm Incidents in Ramsey County, MN Date Location Magnitude Deaths/ Property Description (mph) Injuries Damage April 26, u/ku/k0/6u/k-- 1984 May 1998Saint Paul 100 0/0 $48M A derecho damaged 2,000 homes and fell thousands of trees. May 9, Saint Paul 720/0 $330kMany reports of tree and 2004 structure damages. September Countywide 750/1 $25M Many homes were 21, 2005 destroyed by falling trees, and the roof of a mobile home in Mounds View was blown off. Roads were blocked throughout the county. August Saint Paul 690/1 One home was destroyed 2007 when a tree fell on it, and one man was injured by a window crashing in on him. Part of the grandstand’s roof at the State Fair was blown off, and dozens of vendor booths were damaged. XCEL Energy reported 250,000 outages in the metro region. June 10, Saint Paul 700/0 $50k Blew down a large swath 2012 of trees from the Highland Park area toward Randolph Avenue. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 32 Council Packet Page Number 116 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Date Location Magnitude Deaths/ Property Description (mph) Injuries Damage November Saint Paul640/0$50kMost of the damage was 10, 2012 the result of trees landing on cars, houses and sheds. July 5, Lauderdale 600/0 $25k 138,000 people were 2016 without power during the storm. June 11, Saint Paul 580/2 u/k -- 2017 August 2, Little Canada, 600/0 $30k -- 2022 Saint Paul, Vadnais Heights 10 ---- 0/10 $73,485,000 -- Significant total Incidents claimed Sources: NCEI; 2019 Ramsey MHMP 3.12.4.2 Tornado History According to NCEI records, eight tornadoes were reported in Ramsey County between 1950 and July 2024, causing one death, 168 injuries, and over $151 million in reported property damage. Tornado classification ranged from F0/EF0 to F4. Notable tornadic incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 23. Table 23. Notable Tornadic Incidents in Ramsey County, MN Date LocationMagnitude Deaths/ Property Description InjuriesDamage May 6, u/k F4 0/108 $25M Part of one of the worst tornado 1965 outbreaks in Minnesota history. Six tornadoes affected six counties around the Twin Cities with 13 fatalities and over 500 injured. June 28, u/k F1 0/0 $250k Part of another large outbreak of 1979 16 tornadoes. June 14, Roseville F3 1/60 $25M The Lt. Governor activated 120 1981 National Guard military police to prevent the looting of damaged businesses and homes. April 26, St. Anthony F3 1/53 $25M Four churches and a mall were 1984 among the damages. May 15, Roseville F1 0/0 $150M Seven houses were destroyed, 1998 and 102 severely damaged. Along with the tornado there was widespread hail. May 22, Mounds EF-0 0/0 $20k Most of the damage was due to Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 33 Council Packet Page Number 117 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 2011 View sporadic trees being blown down. July 18, Shoreview EF-00/0$500kThe highest numbers of toppled 2015 (North and snapped trees occurred at Oaks) Deep Lake. Some trees fell on houses, vehicles, and other structures. August Saint Paul EF-0 0/0 $150k Several homes had damage 27, 2022 (mainly roof damage) which occurred as multiple large trees were either uprooted or blown down along the tornado's path. The maximum width was 100 yards with a peak wind of 75 mph. Sources: NCDC; 2019 Ramsey MHMP 3.12.5 PROBABILITY Windstorms are an annual occurrence and are likely to occur each year. Seven significant tornadoes have occurred since 1970, giving a probability of approximately a 13% chance of a significant tornado occurring within any given year. 3.12.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS While the exact relationship between climate change and tornadoes is complex and still under active research, the evidence suggests that climate change is likely to impact the frequency, intensity, and distribution of severe windstorms and tornadoes in the Midwest. 3.12.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.12.7.1 People All individuals who live, work, and recreate within Ramsey County are at risk of impact from windstorms and tornadoes. The most likely impacts are from electrical outages (which affects heating/cooling, food storage, communications, and use of durable medical equipment), although individuals may also suffer transportation disruptions from downed trees, medical conditions from debris cleanup, auto accidents, and injuries or fatalities from downed trees or blown objects. Taking cover during inclement weather reduces many of these impacts. 3.12.7.2 Property In "strong wind" conditions, small branches break off trees, and loose objects are blown about. Isolated occurrences of wind damage to porches, carports, awnings, or pool enclosures may take place. Power outages are common, especially in winter months. In "damaging wind" conditions, wind damage occurs to unanchored mobile homes, porches, carports, awnings, and pool enclosures, with some shingles blown from roofs. Large branches break off trees, with weak or diseased trees blown down. Loose objects are easily blown about and can become dangerous projectiles. Power outages are likely to be more extensive. Other utility outages, such as Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 34 Council Packet Page Number 118 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 communication, may also occur. Damaging high winds are considered extremely dangerous for high- profile vehicles. In “very damaging” and “violent wind” conditions, including tornadic winds, a wide range of impacts on property may occur, depending on intensity, duration, and the vulnerability of the structures in their path. This may include but is not limited to, uplifting of roofs; severe damage up to the complete destruction of walls, windows, and doors; larger projectiles including vehicles; and widespread and long- lasting power outages. 3.12.7.3 Environment The environment is at high exposure to windstorms and tornadoes. Common types of environmental damage include severe damage to trees that can lead to habitat loss and soil erosion, wind erosion in agricultural areas leading to reduction of soil fertility and dust storms, wildlife displacement including the destruction of nesting sites, increased debris in water bodies leading to disruption of aquatic habitats, and the introduction of invasive species. 3.12.7.4 County and Community Operations Damaging windstorms and tornadic incidents can have significant impacts on County and community operations. Emergency services may be overwhelmed and communication, including 911, may be damaged leading to difficulties in coordinating response efforts. Utility and transportation infrastructure may be compromised, delaying assistance. Public health may also be impaired by disruptions to sanitation and crowded shelters. Public services may also be disrupted, including schools, libraries, parks, and community centers, affecting community resources and recreation. 3.12.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Significant risk of injuries and fatalities, especially for individuals caught in the path of tornadoes or in structures unable to withstand high winds. Displacement of residents due to destroyed or severely damaged homes. Mental health impacts, including trauma and stress, particularly among children and those who experience severe losses. Impact on Responders High risk of injury or death for responders during rescue and recovery operations in hazardous conditions. Strain on emergency services due to increased demand for rescue, medical, and logistical support. Potential for responder fatigue and mental health challenges due to prolonged and intense operations. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 35 Council Packet Page Number 119 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Impact on Continuity of Operations Disruption of government operations due to damage to administrative buildings, communication networks, and essential infrastructure. Potential delays in providing public services, impacting community support and recovery efforts. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Extensive damage or destruction of residential, commercial, and industrial buildings, including critical infrastructure, including power lines, water supply systems, and transportation networks. High repair and reconstruction costs, leading to prolonged recovery periods. Impact on the Environment Uprooting of trees and destruction of natural habitats, impacting local wildlife. Potential for hazardous material spills from damaged industrial sites, contaminating soil and water sources. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Economic losses due to business closures, property damage, and interruption of commercial activities. Significant financial burden on local government and residents for recovery and rebuilding efforts. Potential decline in property values and loss of tax revenue. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Public scrutiny and potential dissatisfaction with the government's preparedness and response efforts. 3.13Winter Weather Hazards 3.13.1 PROFILE According to the NWS, a winter weather event is “a winter weather phenomenon (such as snow, sleet, ice, wind chill) that impacts public safety, transportation, and/or commerce”. The most common types of winter weather phenomena experienced in Ramsey County are described below. Blizzard: A dangerous winter storm that contains large amounts of snow or blowing snow, coupled with winds above 35mph and visibility less than a quarter of a mile. Extreme cold: The NWS doesn't have a set definition for extreme cold, but instead calibrates the point at which forecasters warn residents based on the region's climate. In Ramsey County, the NWS issues “extreme cold” warnings when it feels like -25° F or colder across a wide area for several hours. Ice storm: A storm that deposits at least .25” of ice on exposed surfaces. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 36 Council Packet Page Number 120 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Note that a single winter weather incident may include one or more of these, or other, winter phenomena. 3.13.2 LOCATION All communities within Ramsey County are vulnerable to winter weather. 3.13.3 EXTENT Winter weather is typically forecasted three to seven days in advance by the NWS and can lead to the issuance of a winter weather watch, warning, or advisory in a Hazardous Weather Outlook bulletin. There are several types of these notices depending on conditions. Forecast certainty increases as the time for storm onset decreases. 3.13.3.1 Winter Weather Watch A watch is issued 24 to 72 hours in advance when there is a 50 to 80% chance of hazardous winter weather meeting warning thresholds. It aims to give enough lead time for people to prepare and take necessary actions. Table 24. Winter Weather Watch Types Watch Type Description Winter Storm Watch Conditions are favorable for a winter storm event (heavy sleet, heavy snow, ice storm, heavy snow and blowing snow or a combination of events) to meet or exceed local winter storm warning criteria in the next 24 to 72 hours. Criteria for snow is 7 inches or more in 12 hours or less; or 9 inches or more in 24 hours covering at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Use "mid-point" of snowfall range to trigger a watch (i.e. 5 to 8 inches of snow = watch). Criteria for ice is 1/2 inch or more over at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. This includes lake-effect snow. Wind Chill WatchConditions are favorable for wind chill temperatures to meet or exceed local wind chill warning criteria in the next 24 to 72 hours. Wind chill temperatures may reach or exceed - 25°F. Source: National Weather Service 3.13.3.2 Winter Weather Warning These products are issued when hazardous winter weather is occurring, imminent, or highly likely (over 80% probability). A warning indicates conditions that threaten life or property. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 37 Council Packet Page Number 121 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Table 25. Winter Weather Warning Types Warning Type Description Blizzard Warning Blizzard event is imminent or expected in the next 12 to 36 hours. Sustained wind or frequent gusts greater than or equal to 35 mph will accompany falling and/or blowing snow to frequently reduce visibility to less than 1/4 mile for three or more hours. Ice Storm Warning An ice storm event is expected to meet or exceed local ice storm warning criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours. Criteria for ice is 1/2 inch or more over at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Winter Storm Warning A winter storm event (heavy sleet, heavy snow, ice storm, heavy snow and blowing snow or a combination of events) is expected to meet or exceed local winter storm warning criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours. Criteria for snow is 7 inches or more in 12 hours or less; or 9 inches or more in 24 hours covering at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Use "mid-point" of snowfall range to trigger warning (i.e 5 to 8 inches of snow = warning). Criteria for ice is 1/2 inch or more over at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Wind Chill Warning Wind chill temperatures are expected to meet or exceed local wind chill warning criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours. Wind chill temperatures may reach or exceed -25°F. Source: www.weather.gov 3.13.3.3 Winter Weather Advisory These products are issued when hazardous winter weather is occurring, imminent, or highly likely (over 80% probability). An advisory is for less serious conditions that cause significant inconvenience and could become life-threatening if caution is not exercised. Table 26. Winter Weather Advisory Types Advisory Type Description Winter Weather Advisory A winter storm event (sleet, snow, freezing rain, snow and blowing snow, or a combination of events) is expected to meet or exceed local winter weather advisory criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours but stay below warning criteria. Criteria for snow is 4 inches or more in 12 hours or less covering at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Use "mid-point" of snowfall range to trigger advisory (i.e 2 to 5 inches of snow = advisory). Criteria for ice is any ice accumulation less than 1/2 inch over at least 50 percent of the zone or encompassing most of the population. Winter Weather Advisory can also be issued for black ice. This is optional. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 38 Council Packet Page Number 122 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Wind Chill Advisory Wind chill temperatures are expected to meet or exceed local wind chill advisory criteria in the next 12 to 36 hours. Wind chill temperatures may reach or exceed -15°F. Source: www.weather.gov 3.13.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has a significant history of damaging windstorms and tornadoes. The NCEI Storm Events Database was consulted for incident records. According to NCEI records, there have been 109 significant winter weather incidents reported between 1950 and July 2024. This dataset recorded five deaths and two injuries since 1950. Notable winter weather incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 27. Table 27. Notable Winter Weather Incidents in Ramsey County, MN DateType Deaths/ Description Injuries January 17, Ice storm 0/0 Up to 1" of ice accumulated over much of the 1996 Minneapolis/Saint Paul region, resulting in significant tree damage and power outages. More than 180,000 metro residents were without power, and 5 Red Cross shelters were open to assist people who were forced from their homes due to lack of heat. February 2, Extreme cold/ 0/0 A new record low temperature for Minnesota was set 1996 wind chill in the town of Tower at -60° F. Numerous record low temperatures were set during the period at St. Cloud, Rochester and the Twin Cities. Minneapolis/Saint Paul set 3 new record low temperatures as well as recording the 2nd coldest day on record. A mean temperature of -25° F was measured that day with a high of -17° F and a low of -32° F in the Twin Cities. This was within 2 degrees of tying the all-time record low temperature set in the Twin Cities and the coldest temperature recorded this century. Many central and southern Minnesota locations set new record low temperatures. The Governor closed all schools that day. January 12, Heavy snow 0/0 9" of snow fell at the Twin Cities International 2000 Airport, and the Minnesota Highway Patrol responded to over 325 crashes in the Twin Cities – however, most were minor without injuries. January 19, Heavy snow 0/0 8" of snow was recorded at the Twin Cities 2001 International Airport. January 15, Cold/ wind chill 1/0 A disabled woman was found dead of exposure 2005 outside of Como Park Conservatory. The low temperature during the night that she was missing was 9 degrees below zero. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 39 Council Packet Page Number 123 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 DateType Deaths/ Description Injuries January 15, Cold / wind chill2/0Windchill fell below -35° F. 2009 December Winter storm 0/0 This was the biggest snowstorm since the Halloween 10, 2010 Blizzard of 1991, and the average snowfall in Ramsey County was 18". February 20, Winter storm 0/0 Lightning was observed by several people, amidst a 2011 storm that brought 12-16" of snow. December Winter weather 0/0 Heavy, wet snow fell during the holiday, resulting in 31, 2011 numerous accidents across the county. December 9, Winter storm 0/0 12-16" of snow were reported across the county. 2012 January 2014 Extreme cold/ 0/0 Wind chill values dropped below -35° F for several wind chill hours, during a prolonged period of cold. Propane supplies in the region became very low, leading to the Governor declaring a Peacetime State of Emergency. Earlier in the month the Governor canceled all public-school classes in the state due to extreme wind chills. It was the first such closing in 17 years. February 2, Winter storm 0/0 10-13" of snow fell, resulting in 175 flights canceled 2016 or delayed at the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport. December Extreme cold/ 1/1 A woman froze to death in Saint Paul, outside of her 12, 2016 wind chill apartment building when the wind chill dropped to - 19° F. January 1, Extreme cold/ 1/1 A man was found in Saint Paulwho had died from 2018 wind chill exposure. January 22, Winter storm 0/0 8-12" of snow fell across the county. 2018 April 13, Winter storm 0/0 Multiple waves of winter precipitation occurred, 2018 including sleet and snow, resulted in total snowfall amounts of 16-20". 16 Significant -- 5/2 -- Incidents Sources: NCEI and 2019 Ramsey MHMP 3.13.5 PROBABILITY Winter storms affect Ramsey County each year, so there is a nearly 100% probability of winter weather in a single year. Extreme cold temperatures also affect the county nearly every year. The amount of snow and ice, the number of blizzards, and days of sub-zero temperatures each year are unpredictable. 3.13.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change may affect winter storms in the Midwest United States in several ways: Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 40 Council Packet Page Number 124 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Temperature Fluctuations: Temperature fluctuations are increasingly causing cycles of melting and refreezing, which heightens the risk of ice storms and hazardous driving conditions. In Minnesota, most of the observed warming has occurred during the coldest periods. Since records began in January 1895, average daily low temperatures have increased at more than twice the rate of high temperatures. The winter season (December through February) has warmed 2-3 times faster than summer (June through August). This winter warming has accelerated in recent decades. From 1970 to 2021, average daily winter low temperatures rose over 15 times faster than summer high temperatures. The frequency of extreme cold temperatures, such as -35°F in northern Minnesota and -25°F in the southern region, has decreased by up to 90%. While Minnesota will continue to experience periodic severe cold spells, the long-term decline in extreme cold is almost certain to persist. Increased Intensity: Warmer temperatures can lead to more moisture in the atmosphere, potentially resulting in heavier snowfall and more intense winter storms. Frequency of Extreme Events: While overall winter precipitation might decrease in some areas, the frequency of extreme winter weather events could increase. Shift in Snowfall Patterns: Changes in temperature and precipitation patterns could shift where and when snow falls, affecting traditional snowfall regions and potentially leading to unexpected snowstorms in areas that usually receive less snow. More Rain than Snow: Warmer winter temperatures might lead to more winter precipitation falling as rain rather than snow, increasing the risk of flooding and reducing snowpack. Prolonged Storm Duration: Changes in atmospheric circulation patterns could lead to slower- moving storms, resulting in longer-lasting and potentially more damaging winter weather events. Changes in Storm Tracks: Alterations in the jet stream and other atmospheric patterns may change the paths that winter storms take, affecting which areas are most impacted. Increased Energy Costs: More intense and frequent storms could lead to higher energy demands for heating and storm response, impacting infrastructure and increasing costs for residents. Public Health Impacts: Greater variability and intensity in winter storms can lead to increased risks to public health, such as hypothermia, frostbite, and accidents related to icy conditions. While the exact relationship between climate change and tornadoes is complex and still under active research, the evidence suggests that climate change is likely to impact the frequency, intensity, and distribution of winter weather in the Midwest. Improved understanding and modeling of these changes are essential for developing effective mitigation and adaptation strategies. 3.13.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.13.7.1 People Blizzards can cause whiteout conditions, making travel dangerous and leading to numerous accidents. They can also disrupt transportation and supply chains, leaving people stranded and unable to access Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 41 Council Packet Page Number 125 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 essential services. Extreme cold poses serious health risks such as hypothermia and frostbite, particularly for the elderly, young children, and those without adequate heating. Unhoused individuals and those living in poorly insulated homes are especially at risk. Ice storms create hazardous conditions by coating roads, power lines, and trees with ice, often resulting in widespread power outages and dangerous driving conditions. The loss of power can leave people without heat, light, and communication, exacerbating the risks, especially for those dependent on electricity for medical devices. Additionally, ice can make walkways treacherous, increasing the risk of falls. 3.13.7.2 Property Blizzards can lead to significant snow accumulation, causing roofs to collapse under the weight. Extreme cold can cause pipes to freeze and burst, resulting in extensive water damage and costly repairs for homes and businesses. It can also strain heating systems, leading to potential failures during peak demand periods. Ice storms are particularly damaging as they coat power lines, trees, and structures with a heavy layer of ice. This can cause trees to fall and power lines to snap, leading to widespread power outages that may take days or even weeks to repair. The combined effects of these winter weather events pose significant challenges to maintaining the safety and functionality of property and infrastructure. 3.13.7.3 Environment Winter weather can alter habitats and potentially disrupt the food sources and migratory patterns of wildlife. Heavy snow cover and ice accumulation can damage vegetation, particularly trees and shrubs that are not adapted to withstand such weight, leading to long-term ecological impacts. Extreme cold spells can be detrimental to both flora and fauna, with prolonged exposure to freezing temperatures causing frost damage to plants and endangering animals that lack sufficient shelter or are unable to find adequate food. Additionally, ice buildup on rivers and lakes can impact aquatic ecosystems by altering water flow and potentially causing fish kills due to reduced oxygen levels. The cumulative effect of these winter weather events can lead to significant disruptions in the natural environment, affecting biodiversity and the overall health of ecosystems. 3.13.7.4 County and Community Operations Government and community operations can be greatly impacted by winter weather. Blizzards and ice storms can cripple transportation systems, making roads impassable and hindering the movement of emergency vehicles, public transportation, and supply chains. Extreme cold can strain public infrastructure, leading to increased demand for heating and energy, which can overwhelm utilities and cause power outages. Ice storms are particularly devastating as they can lead to widespread power outages by bringing down power lines and damaging infrastructure. The result of any of these can halt government operations, disrupt communication networks, and impede the delivery of critical services. Additionally, the cleanup and repair efforts following such events can place a significant financial burden on local governments and communities, diverting resources from other important projects and services. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 42 Council Packet Page Number 126 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.13.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Risk of injuries and fatalities due to exposure, traffic accidents, and falls on icy surfaces, and exacerbation of existing health conditions, such as cardiovascular and respiratory issues. Isolation due to impassable roads, leading to shortages of food, water, and medical supplies. Increased demand on healthcare facilities due to weather-related injuries and illnesses. Power outages caused by ice accumulation on power lines and trees, leading to heating issues and potential carbon monoxide poisoning from alternative heating sources. Impact on Responders Difficult and hazardous conditions for emergency responders, increasing the risk of injuries during response efforts. Delayed response times due to impassable roads and treacherous conditions. Increased demand for emergency services, leading to responder fatigue and resource depletion. Continuity of Operations Disruption of government operations due to office closures and staff inability to commute. Strain on infrastructure, such as heating systems and power grids, impacting the ability to maintain essential services. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Structural damage to buildings and homes due to heavy snow loads and wind. Risk of burst pipes and water damage in homes and public facilities. Increased wear and tear on heating systems, potentially leading to failures and costly repairs. Damage to power lines, trees, and structures from ice accumulation. Impact on the Environment Potential for water contamination from road salt and chemical de-icers. Damage to trees and vegetation from heavy snow and ice accumulation. Stress on local wildlife and ecosystems, particularly aquatic systems that may freeze over. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Economic losses from business closures, supply chain disruptions, and increased costs for snow and ice removal. Increased energy costs for heating, impacting household budgets and business operations. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 43 Council Packet Page Number 127 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Public dissatisfaction if government response is perceived as inadequate or slow, particularly in terms of snow and ice removal, power restoration, and emergency services. Potential erosion of trust if communication is not clear, timely, and effective during and after the event. 3.14Human-Caused Hazards 3.14.1 PROFILE Many human-caused hazards may affect Ramsey County. These include, but are not limited to: Active shooter/hostile incident: A situation in which one or more individuals are actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area, typically using firearms. These incidents are characterized by their unpredictability and rapid evolution, often involving multiple victims and posing significant threats to public safety. Civil Unrest: A situation in which one or more individuals are actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area, typically using firearms. These incidents are characterized by their unpredictability and rapid evolution, often involving multiple victims and posing significant threats to public safety. Cyberattack: A deliberate and malicious attempt by an individual or group to breach the information systems of another individual, organization, or government. These attacks aim to steal, alter, or destroy data, disrupt operations, or cause harm in various other ways. Cyberattacks can take many forms, including malware, phishing, Denial-of-Service (DoS), ransomware, Man-in-the-Middle (MitM), SQL injection, and zero-day exploits. Cyberattacks can cause significant financial, operational, and reputational damage. Terrorism: The unlawful use of violence or threats of violence, especially against civilians, to create fear and achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives. Terrorism can be perpetrated by individuals, groups, or state-sponsored actors and often aims to influence an audience beyond the immediate victims. Examples of terrorism include bombings, shootings, hijackings, kidnappings, and cyberattacks that are intended to cause widespread disruption or fear. Although not natural hazards, these hazards have been included to address and reduce the risks they pose to public safety, infrastructure, and essential services. 3.14.2 LOCATION Active shooter events are most likely to take place in locations with high concentrations of people, such as schools, workplaces, shopping centers, places of worship, and public events. These settings are often targeted due to the presence of numerous potential victims and the ability to create widespread fear and disruption. Civil unrest is most likely to take place in urban areas and locations where large groups of people can gather, such as city centers, public squares, government buildings, and university campuses. These areas Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 44 Council Packet Page Number 128 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 are often chosen for protests and demonstrations due to their visibility, accessibility, and symbolic significance. Cyberattacks are most likely to target critical infrastructure, financial institutions, government agencies, healthcare systems, large corporations, and any organizations that handle sensitive or valuable data. Additionally, cyberattacks can affect individual users through personal devices, social media accounts, and online services. These targets are chosen due to the potential for significant disruption, financial gain, or access to sensitive information. Terrorism is most likely to take place in high-profile public spaces, government buildings, transportation hubs, tourist attractions, and large gatherings or events such as concerts, festivals, or sports arenas. These locations are targeted for their potential to cause maximum casualties, widespread fear, and significant media attention. 3.14.3 EXTENT The extent of a human-caused hazard can be defined by several key factors: Geographic Scope: The specific geographical area affected by the hazard, which could range from a single location (e.g., a building or city block) to a broader region or even global impact in the case of cyberattacks. Intensity and severity: The level of violence, disruption, or damage caused by the hazard, including casualties, injuries, property damage, and economic impact. Duration: The period over which the hazard persists, from the initial incident to the resolution or containment by authorities. Psychological and social impact: The emotional and psychological effects on individuals and communities, including fear, trauma, and social unrest. Response and recovery efforts: The effectiveness and timeliness of emergency response, law enforcement actions, and recovery efforts to mitigate the hazard's effects and restore normalcy. Broader implications: The potential for the hazard to impact societal norms, public policy, international relations, and the overall sense of security and resilience within affected communities. Defining the extent of a human-caused hazard involves assessing these dimensions to understand its full impact and implications for preparedness, response, and mitigation efforts. 3.14.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has several notable human-caused hazard incidents in its history. News archives and local government agencies were consulted to obtain this information. According to these records and accounts, there have been at least 5 significant human-caused hazard incidents reported between 1950 and July 2024. This dataset recorded at least 3 deaths and an indeterminable number injuries since 1950; at least $354M in damages were recorded from these incidents. Notable incidents since 1950 are displayed in Table 28. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 45 Council Packet Page Number 129 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Table 28. Notable Human-Caused Hazard Incidents in Ramsey County, MN Date Type Deaths/ Property Description Injuries Damage July 20, 1967 Civil 0/24 $4.2MIn response to a pre-meditated plot by Black unrest Panther leader Stokely Carmichael. Widespread violence, including rock and bottle-throwing at law enforcement and fires set to businesses along Plymouth Avenue, quickly engulfed the area and lasted three days. April 4, 1968 Civil 1/0u/k Following the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther unrest – King, a wave of protesters marched in the Active streets but remained non-violent. One shooter individual, stating anger at King’s death, vowed to avenge it by killing the first white man he saw and did so using a .45 caliber weapon. September 1, Civil 0/0u/k In a crowd of 10,000 protesters at the 2008 unrest Republican National Convention, a group of approximately 300 turned to civil unrest and broke windows, slashed tires, and harassed delegates. Arrests led to the discovery of additional weapons including Maltov cocktails. May 26, Civil 2/0$350M In response to the death of George Floyd, public 2020 unrest outrage developed into the second-most destructive period of civil unrest in U.S. history, after the 1992 Los Angeles riots. December 2, Cyber 0/0None A vendor that provides technology services to 2020 attack reported Ramsey County advised the county that its security had been breached by a hacker seeking to extort payment through a ransomware scheme. Information of up to 8,700 clients of the Family Health Division may have been compromised. July 19, 2024 Cyber 0/0None A technical problem of global cybersecurity firm outage reported CrowdStrike caused software failures across the country, including Ramsey County. Of most significance, hospitals and airports were impacted, disrupting operations. 3.14.5 PROBABILITY Human-caused hazards are relatively rare compared to other hazards but have the potential for significant impacts. 3.14.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change may influence human-caused hazards in several ways: Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 46 Council Packet Page Number 130 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Incident catalyst: Protests and incidents may be caused be a person or persons concerned about the future impacts of climate change. Resource scarcity: Climate change can exacerbate competition for resources such as water and food, potentially leading to social unrest and conflicts that could escalate into human-caused hazards like civil unrest or terrorism. Migration and displacement: Rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and other climate- related factors can force populations to migrate or become displaced. Displaced populations may face social, economic, and political challenges that contribute to instability and increase the likelihood of human-caused hazards. Infrastructure vulnerability: Climate change can increase the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to damage from extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, floods, or wildfires. This damage can disrupt essential services and create conditions that are conducive to human- caused hazards. Changing patterns of disease: Climate change can alter the geographic distribution and prevalence of diseases, potentially leading to public health crises that strain healthcare systems and social stability, contributing to human-caused hazards. While climate change itself is not a direct cause of human-caused hazards, its complex interactions with socio-economic and environmental factors can create conditions that increase the likelihood or severity of such hazards. 3.14.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 3.14.7.1 People Children and youth may lack the awareness, experience, or physical capabilities to respond effectively during emergencies such as active shooter incidents or civil unrest. They are also at increased risk of physical injury, psychological trauma, disrupted education, and long-term emotional effects due to exposure to violence or dangerous situations. Elderly individuals and those with disabilities may have limited mobility, sensory impairments, or chronic health conditions that hinder their ability to evacuate or seek safety during emergencies. This population also has a higher likelihood of physical harm, exacerbation of existing health conditions, and increased dependency on caregivers or emergency services during and after human-caused hazards. Minority and immigrant communities may face an increased risk of being targeted in hate crimes, limited access to timely and accurate information, and challenges in accessing support services or legal protection. 3.14.7.2 Property Critical infrastructure such as power plants, water treatment facilities, transportation hubs (airports, train stations), and communication networks essential for societal functioning may be targeted as disruption to these systems can have cascading effects on public safety, health, and economic stability. Government buildings such as courthouses, legislative centers, and civic centers represent symbols of authority, governance, and democracy and attacks on these can lead to physical damage, loss of critical records, disruption of government services, and psychological impact on the community and workforce. Locations where large numbers of people gather, such as stadiums, concert halls, shopping malls, and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 47 Council Packet Page Number 131 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 cultural venues are also vulnerable as a result of those seeking maximum casualties and media attention. 3.14.7.3 Environment The environment tends to be less vulnerable to human-caused hazards than natural hazards, but terrorist activities, particularly those involving sabotage or arson, can target natural resources such as forests, wildlife reserves, and water bodies. Destruction of these resources can lead to ecological damage, loss of biodiversity, and long-term environmental degradation. Contamination from chemical attacks, biological agents, or radioactive materials can also have severe and long-lasting environmental consequences. 3.14.7.4 County and Community Operations Attacks on government facilities or critical infrastructure can disrupt essential services such as law enforcement, emergency response, public utilities, and healthcare systems. This can compromise public safety and hinder effective response to emergencies. They can also erode public trust in the government's ability to provide security and protect citizens, leading to increased fear, anxiety, and uncertainty. In addition, attacks on economic targets or disruptions to business operations can lead to financial losses, reduced investor confidence, and economic instability within the community. Lastly, human-caused hazard incidents can create fear, trauma, and social unrest within communities, impacting mental health, social cohesion, and community resilience. 3.14.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Risk of injuries and fatalities among civilians caught in the incident. Risk of mass casualties and widespread injuries. Psychological trauma and long-term mental health issues for survivors and witnesses. Increased fear and anxiety within the community, potentially leading to changes in daily behavior and routines. Heightened community tensions and divisions, potentially leading to long-term social unrest. Personal data breaches, leading to identity theft and financial losses. Disruption of access to essential online services, impacting communication, banking, and healthcare. Increased anxiety and mistrust regarding digital security and privacy. Impact on Responders High-risk conditions for law enforcement and emergency medical responders, with potential for responder injuries and fatalities. Psychological impact on responders, including stress and trauma from witnessing or experiencing violence. Strain on resources and personnel, leading to fatigue and reduced effectiveness over time. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 48 Council Packet Page Number 132 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Negative public perception and backlash against responders. Impact on Continuity of Operations Immediate disruption of operations in affected areas, including lockdowns and evacuations. Disruption of government operations and essential services, especially if including government operations, healthcare, banking, and utilities are targeted. Long-term impacts on service delivery due to damaged infrastructure and ongoing security concerns. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Significant risk of property damage, including vandalism, arson, looting, explosions, fires, or other destructive methods. Damage to digital infrastructure, including servers, networks, and databases. High repair and replacement costs for damaged infrastructure and facilities and strengthening of cybersecurity measures. Impact on the Environment Damage from fires, chemical spills, or other destructive actions. Long-term impacts from contamination, structural damage, and delayed environmental remediation. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Economic losses from business closures, decreased tourism, and reduced consumer confidence. Costs associated with increased security measures and mental health support services. Long-term impacts on economic growth and stability due to ongoing social tensions and security concerns. Economic losses from disrupted business operations, data breaches, and decreased consumer confidence in digital services. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Erosion of public trust if response is perceived as inadequate or slow. Increased public dissatisfaction and mistrust in government if response is perceived as heavy- handed or ineffective. Erosion of public trust in digital services and government cybersecurity measures. Erosion of confidence in government’s ability to ensure safety and security. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 49 Council Packet Page Number 133 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.15Infrastructure Failure 3.15.1PROFILE Infrastructure failure encompasses a range of events that disrupt the normal functioning of essential systems and services in the community, and can have widespread and severe consequences for communities, economies, and the environment. Failures may include: Transportation Accidents: These are incidents that disrupt the transportation system, such as vehicle collisions, train derailments, or aircraft crashes, which can lead to significant delays, injuries, or fatalities. Electrical/Fuel Shortages: These occur when the supply of electricity or fuel is insufficient to meet demand, often due to infrastructure damage, supply chain issues, or increased consumption. This can result in power outages and hinder transportation and other critical services. Supply Chain Disruption: This refers to interruptions in the flow of goods and services, which can be caused by natural disasters, manufacturing problems, or transportation failures. Such disruptions can lead to shortages of essential items and economic losses. Water Contamination: This involves the pollution of water supplies with harmful substances, which can occur due to infrastructure breakdowns, such as leaks or breaches in containment systems. Contaminated water poses serious health risks and can affect a wide range of activities, from drinking water provision to agriculture. Although not natural hazards, these hazards have been included to address and reduce the risks they pose to public safety, infrastructure, and essential services. 3.15.2 LOCATION Infrastructure failures have significant impacts on a given community. Below are the likely locations for infrastructure failures within Ramsey County: Transportation Roadways – Ramsey County is served by a number of major roadways including Interstates 94 (I- 94), 35E (I35E), and 694 (I-694); US Highways 52 and 61; and MN State Highways 36 (MN-36), 51 (MN-51), and 280 (MN-280). Additionally, there are a number of major county roads that transverse the region as well. Intersections/Interchanges – Major intersections/interchanges in Ramsey County include I-94 and I-35E, I-94 and MN-280, and I-694 and I-35E. Other significant urban and suburban intersections are located across the county as well. Bridges and Overpasses – Ramsey County has a number of key bridges and overpasses including a number that span the Mississippi River and interstate and highway overpasses. Railroads – Ramsey County is a significant hub for rail transportation in the region, with BNSF Railway, Union Pacific Railroad, Canadian Pacific Railway, and Amtrak providing freight and passenger services with the county. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 50 Council Packet Page Number 134 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Airports – While the major airport that services Ramsey County, Minneapolis – Saint Paul International Airport (MSP) is located in adjacent Hennepin County, portions of Ramsey County will be in the flight path for MSP. In addition, there are two smaller airports located within the County: Saint Paul Downtown Airport (STP) and Lake Elmo Airport. Electrical/Fuel Shortages Power plants – The county has a number of power generation facilities that provide service to local and regional energy supply. Two significant stations include Xcel Energy – High Bridge and District Energy Saint Paul. Transmission Lines – The exact location of electrical transmission lines can vary, and are typically mapped by utility companies, such as Xcel Energy. They are usually strategically located along major transportation routes, utility corridors, and near industrial zones. Substations – In Ramsey County, several substations are operated by utility companies to manage and distribute electrical power. Some of the key locations include Riverside Substation, Rice Street Substation, Dale Street Substation, Midway Substation, Downtown Substation, and Roseville Substation. Exact locations can be identified by the electrical companies. Fuel Storage Facilities – Fuel storage facilities are distributed across the region to support residential, commercial, and industrial fuel needs. Distribution Networks – Distribution networks consist of a combination of overhead and underground power lines, transformers, and substations. These networks are typically managed by utility companies. Pipelines – Ramsey County is intersected by several major pipelines that transport various types of products, including oil, natural gas, and refined products. Supply Chain Disruption Warehouses and distribution centers – Ramsey County has several significant warehouses and distribution centers that support a range of industries. They are typically located in close proximity to major highways, transportation hubs, and industrial zones. Transportation Hubs – There are a number of transportation hubs that facilitate the movement of goods throughout the region including MSP, rail lines, and key interstate interchanges such as I-94 and I-35E and I-694 and I-35E. Manufacturing Plants – Ramsey County is home to a number of notable manufacturers that support a diverse range of industries including machinery, food production, and consumer goods. Key industrial areas include Maplewood Industrial Area, Midway Industrial Area, and Roseville Industrial Area. Water Contamination Water Treatment Plants – the key water treatment facilities in Ramsey are Saint Paul Regional Water Services, Metro Wastewater Reclamation Point, Saint Paul Water Treatment Plant, all located within Saint Paul. There are also a number of facilities located across the county, operated by Ramsey County Regional Water, which service specific communities and townships. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 51 Council Packet Page Number 135 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Industrial Sites – There are a number of industrial sites within the county that have the potential to release pollutants into water sources due to chemical runoff, wastewater discharges, accidental spills/leaks, stormwater runoff, airborne contaminants, and poor waste disposal practices. Landfills – In addition to the Ramsey County Household Hazardous Waste Facility and the Ramsey/Washington Recycling & Energy Center, a number of landfills and waste management facilities handle municipal solid waste, construction debris, and other types of waste with the potential to impact water sources. Some former sites are now currently closed but continue to be monitored. 3.15.3 EXTENT The extent of infrastructure failure can vary widely due to several factors including the scale of the incident, the affected location, and the resilience of the infrastructure. Transportation incidents – can cause localized disruptions, safety risks, and economic impacts. Electrical/Fuel Shortages – widespread outages can affect homes, businesses, and critical services, creating economic impacts and public health and safety concerns. Supply chain disruptions – can have cascading effects across any number of industries, leading to shortages of goods, increased prices, and economic instability. Delays in the delivery of raw materials can affect manufacturing processes and operations. Water contamination – can have significant health risks, short- and long-term environmental impacts, and costly economic impacts. 3.15.4 HISTORY Ramsey County has experienced various infrastructure failures over the years, significantly impacting the community, local economy, and the environment. Transportation incidents – the most notable transportation accident in Minnesota history was the I-35W Bridge Collapse in 2007. While the event occurred in Minneapolis, it significantly impacted the broader Twin Cities area, including Ramsey County. Electrical/Fuel Shortages – Severe winter storms have caused widespread power outages over the year, impacting homes, business, and critical infrastructure. Supply chain disruptions – COVID-19 caused global and local supply chain disruptions, including in Ramsey County. Additionally, significant floods in the 1960, and most recently 2024, disrupted transportation routes and logistics. Water contamination – In 2017, elevated levels of lead were detected in drinking water in sections of Saint Paul, prompting a response to improve water safety measures. 3.15.5 PROBABILITY The overall probability of infrastructure failures in Ramsey County is likely moderate, with some high risk during extreme weather events. The most likely causes of such failures include severe winter weather, flooding, and other weather-related events. Aging transportation infrastructure, such as road and Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 52 Council Packet Page Number 136 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 bridges, and human caused impacts to communication systems and power grids can also increase the probability of failure. 3.15.6 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change may have profound impacts on infrastructure, leading to failures in the identified systems. Extreme weather events, specifically temperature extremes, are most likely to impact Ramsey County. Possible impacts include: Transportation - Damaged roads, bridges, and railways from buckling road washouts, landslides, and structural failures. Electrical and Fuel Shortages – Damage to power lines, substations, and power plants, leading to outages. Extreme temperatures can also lead to increased demand, putting additional strain on electrical grids. Supply Chain Disruption – temperature changes can affect transportation infrastructure, delaying or restricting the delivery of goods and raw materials, as well as affecting the storage and preservation of goods. Climate change can also lead to resource scarcity, affecting the availability of raw materials. Water Contamination – Flooding and increased runoff can overwhelm sewage and wastewater systems, introducing pollutants into water supplies 3.15.7 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Communities, including Ramsey County, are increasingly vulnerable to various types of infrastructure failures, which can significantly impact daily life, economic stability, and public health. 3.15.7.1 People Infrastructure failure can have immediate and long-term health consequences, including injuries and fatalities, disease outbreaks, and limited access to healthcare and emergency services. The community can also suffer economic impacts from job losses, increased costs for basic needed, and economic instability. 3.15.7.2 Property Residents and businesses can suffer damages from accidents, power surges, and structural failures. Supply chain disruptions can impact property development and ongoing maintenance. 3.15.7.3 Environment Transportation incidents and proximity to industrial areas can impact the environment by contaminating soil and water, harming aquatic life, soil quality, and broader ecosystems from pollutants and toxins. Increased reliance on non-renewable energy sources can lead to higher emissions and environmental degradation as well. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 53 Council Packet Page Number 137 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 3.15.7.4 County and Community Operations Infrastructure failures can stress the community’s ability to respond quickly and effectively, disrupting public services and increasing costs for repairs and recovery. Increased public health responsibilities, delays in procurement, and long-term environmental remediation and management can also result from any number of infrastructure failures. 3.15.8 CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT Impact on the Public Transportation Failure: o Restricted mobility and access to essential services (e.g., hospitals, grocery stores). o Increased risk of accidents and injuries due to unsafe road conditions or lack of public transportation. o Potential isolation of communities, especially in rural or remote areas Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Loss of heating, cooling, and lighting in homes, leading to discomfort or health risks. This could be particularly consequential for vulnerable populations, particularly those who rely on power for medical equipment. o Disruption of communication channels (e.g., internet, phone) that rely on electricity. o Fuel shortages affecting transportation, emergency services, and daily commuting. Supply Chain Disruption: o Shortages of essential goods, including food, medicine, and other critical supplies. o Panic buying, leading to further scarcity and possible civil unrest. o Increased prices due to scarcity, disproportionately affecting low-income households. Water Contamination: o Health risks from consuming or using contaminated water, leading to outbreaks of waterborne diseases. o Need for boil water advisories or reliance on bottled water, adding to public stress and expense. o Disruption of daily hygiene practices and sanitation, exacerbating public health issues. Impact on Responders Transportation Failure: o Delayed response times due to blocked or damaged roads and bridges. o Limited access to affected areas, hampering rescue and relief efforts. Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Compromised communication systems and reduced operational capacity. o Difficulty maintaining emergency power in critical facilities, including public safety, hospitals, and shelters. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 54 Council Packet Page Number 138 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 o Fuel shortages affecting transportation and emergency services. Supply Chain Disruption: o Shortages of necessary equipment and supplies for responders (e.g., medical supplies, fuel). o Increased operational strain due to the need to source and transport scarce resources. Water Contamination: o Increased demand on emergency medical services to address waterborne illnesses. o Challenges in ensuring safe water supply for responders and affected populations. Continuity of Operations Transportation Failure: o Inability to maintain essential services and logistics, affecting government operations. o Delays in implementing recovery and rebuilding efforts. Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Disruption of critical infrastructure operations, including communication, healthcare, and public safety systems. o Reduced capacity to maintain order and provide public services. Supply Chain Disruption: o Delays or failures in delivering essential goods and services, including food, medicine, and emergency supplies. o Increased pressure on government resources to manage and mitigate shortages. Water Contamination: o Interruptions in water-dependent services, such as sanitation, healthcare, and firefighting, and manufacturing. o Increased need for emergency water distribution and purification efforts. Impact on Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure Transportation Failure: o Damage to roads, bridges, and public transit systems, requiring costly repairs. o Potential secondary impacts, such as flooding or erosion, due to compromised transportation infrastructure. Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Damage to electrical grids and fuel supply systems, leading to prolonged outages. o Increased wear and tear on backup systems, requiring additional maintenance and replacement. Supply Chain Disruption: Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 55 Council Packet Page Number 139 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 o Increased demand on storage and distribution facilities, possibly leading to infrastructure strain. Water Contamination: o Damage to water treatment plants and distribution systems, requiring extensive repairs. o Short- and long-term degradation of water quality, affecting property values and infrastructure resilience. Impact on the Environment Transportation Failure: o Increased environmental damage from alternative routes or modes of transportation (e.g., off-road driving, increased air travel). o Potential for environmental contamination from damaged transport vehicles or infrastructure. Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Increased reliance on backup generators, leading to higher emissions and environmental degradation. o Potential for fuel spills or leaks, contaminating soil and water sources. Supply Chain Disruption: o Increased waste from spoiled goods and unused inventory, leading to environmental pollution. o Potential for illegal dumping or improper disposal of hazardous materials. Water Contamination: o Harm to aquatic ecosystems and wildlife due to polluted water sources. o Long-term soil and water degradation, affecting agriculture and natural habitats. Impact on the Economy of the Jurisdiction Transportation Failure: o Economic losses due to costs to repair and replace transportation systems, reduced productivity, disrupted trade, and increased transportation costs. o Long-term impacts on tourism, commerce, and investment due to damaged infrastructure. Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Increased operational costs for businesses and households due to reliance on alternative power sources. o Potential business closures or relocations due to unreliable power and fuel supply. Supply Chain Disruption: Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 56 Council Packet Page Number 140 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 o Loss of revenue for both public and private sectors due to inventory shortages and delayed deliveries. o Increased inflation due to scarcity of goods and rising transportation costs. Water Contamination: o Economic impact on agriculture, fisheries, and industries dependent on clean water. o Increased healthcare costs due to illness and long-term water treatment expenses. Impact on Public Confidence in the Jurisdiction's Governance Transportation Failure: o Public dissatisfaction with government preparedness and response to infrastructure failures. o Perception of government incompetence in maintaining essential services. Electrical and Fuel Shortages: o Loss of public trust in the government's ability to ensure reliable energy and fuel supplies. o Increased public pressure on leadership to address energy infrastructure vulnerabilities. Supply Chain Disruption: o Erosion of confidence in government oversight and regulation of supply chains. o Potential for civil unrest or protest due to perceived government inaction or mismanagement. Water Contamination: o Significant loss of public trust in the government's ability to protect public health and safety. o Heightened scrutiny of water management policies and possible legal or political repercussions. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 57 Council Packet Page Number 141 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 4.Hazard Mitigation Strategy 4.1 Plan Goals The planning process included a review and update of the prior mitigation goals and objectives as a basis for the planning process and selection of appropriate mitigation actions addressing all hazards of concern. Of particular importance was addressing hazards disproportionately affecting populations with increasing risk to climate impacts. Upon consideration, participating jurisdictions opted to change the goals from the 2019 plan update to better align with county and community mitigation efforts. The 2025 goals are: Goal 1. Mitigate impacts to life, property, the economy and the environment from natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. Goal 2. Build and support local capacity to create resiliency from natural, technological, and human- caused hazards. Goal 3. Build resilience for critical infrastructure and systems against impacts of natural, technological and human-caused hazards. Goal 4. Increase education, outreach and awareness to the whole community to build resiliency. Communities were encouraged to use these goals as guideposts when reviewing, updating and adding new hazard mitigation actions. 4.2 Strategy Development Using the updated goals as a planning tool to guide mitigation planning efforts, the LPT collaborated to identify a 2025 hazard mitigation strategy that is both effective and feasible for the county and participating communities. As part of the process, communities reviewed the mitigation strategy from the previous plan and reported on the status of specific hazard mitigation actions, and then reviewed capabilities and risks to identify new hazard mitigation actions as appropriate. At the beginning of the planning process, the planning team set out participation requirements for jurisdictions to be considered full participants in the hazard mitigation plan. Among these requirements, each participating jurisdiction was required to identify at least one new or continuing hazard mitigation action to reduce risk in their community. 4.3 2019 Mitigation Action Reporting Communities were asked to review and update the hazard mitigation actions that were identified in the 2019 plan to better understand the progress that they had made, and to identify actions that they wanted to keep for the 2025 plan update. Communities reviewed each action and identified it in one of four categories: Completed. The action has been completed. Not started. The action has not been started but should be included in the updated strategy. In progress. The action has been started but should still be included in the updated strategy. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 58 Council Packet Page Number 142 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Cancelled. The action is no longer relevant and should be cancelled. 4.4 CompletedActions Community reporting on actions from the 2019 plan yielded the following completed actions. Action Community/Communities Justification Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Little Continue to enforce burning Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, Permits and restrictions are in place; permits/ restrictions.North Saint Paul, Lauderdale maintenance action. Continue to ensure the strong coordination between local fire Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, departments to provide fire Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, protection. Mounds View, New Brighton Coordination is in place; maintenance action. Continue to provide for public safety on roads through anti-icing (application of brine solution before an event), snow removal, salting and sanding to minimize Gem Lake, Little Canada, Mounds the impacts of snow/ice View, Arden Hills, North Oaks, System to apply this action in place; accumulations on roadways. Shoreview, Vadnais Heights maintenance action. 4.5 Cancelled Actions Community reporting on actions from the 2019 plan yielded the following cancelled and completed actions. Action Community/Communities Justification Identify risks and issues preserving safety and security to users in parks and associated facilities shared by school district and city (LGUs). St. Anthony This is a public safety action. Continue to provide for public safety on roads through anti-icing (application of brine solution before an event), snow removal, salting and sanding to minimize the impacts of snow/ice accumulations on roadways. Vadnais HeightsThis is a response action. Identify risks and issues preserving safety and security to users in parks and associated facilities shared by school district and city (LGUs). Vadnais HeightsThis is a public safety action. Implement construction or retrofit projects for safe rooms or storm shelters in identified vulnerable locations. Vadnais HeightsIncluded in different action. Promote water conservation measures to residents during periods of drought and enforce water conservation ordinances when needed. Vadnais HeightsThis is a response action. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 59 Council Packet Page Number 143 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 In addition, some 2019 actions were re-worded or combined with other actions. These actions are reflected in the strategy in Section 4.8. Finally, some 2019 actions were removed from the 2025 strategy due to being outside the scope of hazard mitigation. While not true hazard mitigation actions, they are still considered important by the communities that listed them. A list of these actions is included in Appendix A. 4.62025MitigationStrategyElements For all new and continuing actions, communities were asked to provide background information on the action. Each action includes: Mitigation action name What is the problem the action is solving? How does the action solve the problem? Action status Hazards the action helps mitigate Plan goal(s) the action helps implement Lead and support agencies for each action Potential funding sources to support each action Benefits of implementing the action Estimated cost of the action Estimated timeline for the action 4.7 Action Prioritization Communities were asked to score each action on a set of metrics. These metrics were: Potential for lives saved Potential for reduced property damages Potential for reduced response actions Whether the benefits of the action exceed the costs Internal community action priority ranking Each metric was scored on a scale of 1 – 3, and the total scores were tallied up to identify a final priority ranking. Final rankings were based on a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 15. 5 – 8Low Priority 9 – 12Medium Priority 13 – 15High Priority Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 60 Council Packet Page Number 144 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Once scoring was tallied, they were presented to the LPT and communities during the internal plan review process, along with the invitation to review and edit scores and prioritization as warranted based on specific community needs. Committee members were invited to review the scoring further during the committee plan review period and provide any additional comments or concerns on action prioritization; any comments received were reviewed and incorporated. 4.8 2025 Hazard Mitigation Strategy Ramsey County’s comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy features a wide range of alternatives that make real progress toward buying down the County’s and its communities’ risk from the impacts of hazards. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 61 Council Packet Page Number 145 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn ProgressIn ProgressIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYesYes up for the - 62 How does the action solve the problem?Continue to ensure that all Ramsey County residents are aware of and signCounty’s Everbridge Emergency Notification System.Promote water conservation measures to residents during periods of drought and enforce water conservation ordinances when needed.Participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and enforce local floodplain ordinances to ensure that new construction is built above regulatory flood protection elevation.Continue to promote the use of NOAA weather radios by residents, schools, businesses, and facilities that house persons with functional and access needs. hazardous What is the problem the action is solving?Public Notification during emergenciesGroundwater conservationProperty Damage MitigationPublic alerts of potentiallyconditions Mitigation Action Name Ramsey EverbridgeWater Conservation MeasuresNFIP ParticipationWeather Awareness Information line Heights, Base - Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, Vadnais Heights, White Bear TownshipArden Hills, Falcon Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, Saint AnthonyArden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, Saint AnthonyArden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Little Canada, Mounds View, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, Vadnais Heights, Lauderdale, New Brighton County . Mitigation Strategy BASELINE INFORMATION 29 Action Number 1234 4.8.1 Table Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 146 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn ProgressIn ProgressIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYesYes road - the - 63 lities deemed as critical, i.e. How does the action solve the problem?Identify critical facilities or infrastructure that do not have generator backup power in the event of a major power outage resulting from severe winter or summer storms. (Examples of critical facilities include Police/ Fire departments, EOC’s, health care facilities, water & sewer treatment facilities, and other facipublic schools and sheltering facilities).Update County/City Comprehensive Plans and Zoning Ordinances to include mitigation considerations that help to reduce risk from natural hazards. Utilize data of past hazard events and future climate projections to help inform updates.Identify, prioritize, and implement localized flood reduction measures to improve drainage systems and reduce overflooding to County or municipal roads. Implement construction or retrofit projects for safe rooms or storm shelters in identified vulnerable locations. What is the problem the action is solving?Life safetyEmergency PlanningProperty Damage MitigationLife safety Mitigation Action Name Critical Infrastructure IdentificationComprehensive Plan UpdatesFlood ReductionStorm Shelter Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - Township, Gem | Multi Jurisdiction Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, White Bear Township, Maplewood, North Saint Paul, LauderdaleArden Hills, Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Little Canda, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, White Bear Lake, RosevilleArden Hills, Falcon Heights, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Saint Anthony, Ramsey CountyArden Hills, Falcon Heights, Little Canada, North Oaks, Mounds View, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township, Lauderdale, New Brighton, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Saint Anthony County Action Number 5678 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 147 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn ProgressIn ProgressIn ProgressIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYesYesYes ups - out for - demolition rain events - 64 hazards and emergency - potential construction or retrofit of safe How does the action solve the problem?Identify community areas, parks, and facilities (i.e., schools, government buildings, manufactured home parks) that are vulnerable to tornadoes and evaluate for rooms or storm shelters.Purchase and install generator hookand encourage local generator purchases for identified critical facilities that should have backup power.Continue to promote education & awareness on allpreparedness for schools, individuals, families, and businesses.Provide information & technical assistance to property owners to help mitigate against localized flooding during high(i.e., landscaping / green infrastructure applications).Identify residential, commercial, government facilities, and/or critical infrastructure properties that may experience damage from future flooding and work to implement appropriate mitigation measures (including buyproperty acquisition & structureor relocation). Areas of focus may include previously unidentified flooding locations. What is the problem the action is solving?Life safetyProvide backup power to critical facilitiesPublic EmpowermentProperty Damage MitigationIdentifying infrastructure prone to flooding for future mitigation projects Mitigation Action Name Community Vulnerability AssessmentGenerator BackupsAll Hazards Education and AwarenessFlood Technical AssistanceFlooding Risk Assessment Little Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - Lauderdale, | Multi Jurisdiction Arden Hills, Falcon Heights, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Maplewood, North Saint Paul, Roseville, Saint Anthony, White Bear TownshipArden Hills, Falcon Heights, Mounds View, North Oaks, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township, Gem Lake, North Saint Paul, Saint Anthony, LauderdaleArden Hills, Gem Lake, Canada, Falcon Heights, Maplewood, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Roseview, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, Vadnais Heights, LauderdaleArden Hills, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Shoreview, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Maplewood, Roseville, Saint Anthony, Ramsey CountyArden Hills, Little Canada, Mounds View, North Oaks, Roseville, Shoreview, Gem Lake, North Saint Paul, Lauderdale, Saint Anthony County Action Number 910111213 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 148 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn ProgressNot StartedIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesNoYes risk - safety on 65 icing (application of - How does the action solve the problem?Work with municipal electrical cooperative and power companies to reduce overhead exposure of power lines that are vulnerable to damage from severe winter/summer storms (i.e., high winds, ice, and heavy snow). Replace overhead power lines with underground lines in areas with highexposure (i.e. high tree concentration areas).Continue to provide for public roads through antibrine solution before an event), snow removal, salting and sanding to minimize the impacts of snow/ice accumulations on roadways.Ensures the community has adequate outdoor warning siren coverage.Ensure that wellhead protection plans are in place to address flooding that may lead to contaminated drinking water. outdoor What is the problem the action is solving?Reduction in power outagesIce buildupDelayed notification to community members for severe weather.Safe Drinking Water Icing - De Mitigation Action Name Overhead PowerlinesOutdoor Warning Siren CoverageWellhead Protection Plan Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Arden Hills, New Brighton, North Oaks, North Saint Paul, Shoreview, Saint Anthony, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Mounds View, RosevilleGem Lake, Little Canada, Mounds View, New Brighton, Falcon Heights, Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, North Saint Paul, Saint Anthony, Vadnais HeightsMaplewoodMounds View, North Saint Paul, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, White Bear Township County Action Number 14151617 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 149 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 In Progress Yes 66 Ramsey County will continue to maintain the three base Federal Signal siren systems and three repeater sites for Ramsey County's outdoor warning siren system. Ramsey County also encourages the addition of new outdoor warning sirens in areas where sound propagation is limited or does not exist. This mitigation action addresses Ramsey County's ability to warn residents and visitors who are outdoors of impending hazards. Outdoor warning sirens Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Ramsey County County 18 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 150 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn ProgressIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYes 67 five years, review will, every will reduce the impacts of tornados, down straps and skirting to reduce the - How does the action solve the problem?Ramsey County and update comprehensive plans to include mitigation considerations that help to reduce risk from natural hazards and utilize data from past hazard events as well as future climate projections to help inform updates.This mitigation strategy aims to promote annually at fire department open houses, retrofitting homes, buildings, schools, or public facilities with building materials such as wind resistant film for windows or installing lightning grounding systems, which windstorms, or summer and winter storm events that can cause damage to property, personal injury or loss of life.This mitigation strategy aims to promote annually at fire department open houses, retrofitting of manufactured homes with tieimpacts of severe spring, summer, and winter storms or tornadoes. - to - term future - mitigation action What is the problem the action is solving?This mitigation action addresses planning for longgrowth in Ramsey within a community and ensuring communities are using standard, update zoning, floodplain management, building, and other codesThis addresses the potential for damages to public or private property from severe spring, summer, and winter storms due to poor construction practices or construction materials.This mitigation action addresses the potential for damages to manufactured homes from severe spring, summer, and winter storms. retrofits down straps - Mitigation Action Name County and municipal planning programsBuilding Manufactured home tie Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Ramsey CountyRamsey CountyRamsey County County Action Number 192021 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 151 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn ProgressIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYes 68 to critical infrastructure, ons thereby reducing the risk caused hazards. - Recreation, and the Soil & Water ystems against both natural, technological, How does the action solve the problem?This mitigation strategy aims to promote annually at fire department open houses, the use of NOAA weather radios, ensuring Ramsey County's residents, schools, businesses, and facilities receive immediate alerts, enabling faster response and protective actiof injury, loss of life, and property damage during hazardous events.This mitigation strategy aims to strengthen the cybersecurity measures and physical infrastructure resilience of municipal and county operations to reduce vulnerability to potential hazards, ensuring continuous service delivery and protection of critical sand humanWorking with Ramsey County Public Works, Parks & Conservation District, municipal, and watershed districts over the next three to five years, Ramsey County EMHS will identify and prioritize areas where hillsides, banks or bluffs can be stabilized thereby reducing impacts roads, natural resources, and recreation areas from erosion and slope failure. with functional What is the problem the action is solving?This mitigation action addresses the problem of limited or delayed access to timely warnings for severe weather and other hazards, particularly for vulnerable populations such as those and access needs.This mitigation action addresses the problem of vulnerabilities in the cyber security and physical infrastructure of Ramsey County's operations, which can be exposed to disruption from various hazards.This mitigation action addresses the problem of erosion and slope failure, which can threaten critical infrastructure, roads, natural resources, and recreation areas. Mitigation Action Name NOAA weather radiosCyber securitySlope stabilization Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Ramsey CountyRamsey CountyRamsey County County Action Number 222324 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 152 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressNew ActionNew Action Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesNoNo - ructural 69 ty's Everbridge s and may face higher recovery How does the action solve the problem?Working with the municipal EMA over the next two to three years, Ramsey County EMHS will work to enroll this municipality in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Without NFIP participation, residents are at greater financial risk during flood eventcosts of flooding.Ramsey County will conduct outreach annually to ensure Ramsey County residents, including those who those who use a language other than English, or may have other special needs such as vision or hearing impairment, are aware of and can sign up for the CounEmergency Notification System.This mitigation strategy aims to collaborate with local public and private school districts, as well as institutes of higher learning, to enhance their disaster preparedness and resilience through tailored risk assessments, emergency response plans, and stmitigation measures. By integrating educational institutions into communitywide hazard mitigation strategies, the project aims to safeguard lives, protect critical infrastructure, and ensure continuity of education during and after disasters. - - Ramsey vulnerable to What is the problem the action is solving?This mitigation action addresses the nonparticipation of a community in County that is currently not enrolled in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).This mitigation action addresses Ramsey County's ability to notify residents, including those who use a language other than English, or may have other special needs such as vision or hearing impairment, of impending or ongoing hazards that may affect them or their property.This mitigation action addresses the problem of insufficient disaster preparedness and resilience within educational institutions, which are often disruptions from natural hazards. wide - Mitigation Action Name Enrollment in the NFIP programCountyEverbridge enrollmentSchools and higher education participation Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Ramsey CountyRamsey CountyRamsey County County Action Number 252627 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 153 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status New Action Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? No 70 on, reinforcing soil stability, and How does the action solve the problem?This mitigation strategy aims to mitigate the effects of wind and water erosion by implementing targeted restoration and preservation strategies for impacted natural systems, such as wetlands. This involves activities such as reestablishing native vegetatienhancing hydrological functions to restore ecological balance. , and What is the problem the action is solving?This mitigation action addresses the effects of wind and water erosion in natural systems such as lake shores, stream and riverbankswetlands. Mitigation Action Name Natural systems preservation Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Ramsey County County Action Number 28 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 154 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status New Action Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? No 71 caused hazards - ake to lessen those impacts. How does the action solve the problem?This mitigation strategy aims to provide annually at fire department open houses, education and awareness of the natural, technological, and humanRamsey County is exposed to and may impact the residents, visitors, businesses, schools, and facilities housing persons with access and functional needs, and actions they can t functional What is the problem the action is solving?This mitigation action addresses the problem of insufficient knowledge or preparedness among residents, businesses, schools, and facilities housing persons with access and needs. Mitigation Action Name Community outreach and public education Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Ramsey County County Action Number 29 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 155 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status New Action Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? No 72 entify structures not How does the action solve the problem?Working with Ramsey County GIS over the next two to three years, this mitigation strategy aims to update flood maps potentially identifying structures in the floodplain thereby allowing residents, businesses, schools, and local and county governments to idpreviously set in the floodplain and make decisions about mitigation projects in new developments. inaccurate flood What is the problem the action is solving?This mitigation action addresses the problem of outdated or risk information, which can leave residents, businesses, schools, and governments unaware of newly vulnerable structures or areas. Mitigation Action Name FEMA flood map updates Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Ramsey County County Action Number 30 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 156 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status Not StartedNot StartedNot Started Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYes 73 overhead power r storm shelter. risk exposure (i.e. high tree - How does the action solve the problem?This mitigation action aims to identify and prioritize Ramsey County's community areas, parks, and facilities that are vulnerable to the impacts of tornados, windstorms, and summer weather hazards and evaluate the need for the construction of a safe room oThis mitigation strategy aims to encourage placing power and other utilities underground to reduce overhead exposure of power and cable lines that may be vulnerable to damage from severe winter/summer storms (i.e., high winds, ice, and heavy snow). Replacelines with underground lines in areas with highconcentration areas). This mitigation strategy aims to obtain generators and install generator hookups for critical infrastructure that does not have access to backup power in the event of power outages. power winds or from What is the problem the action is solving?This mitigation action addresses the problem of insufficient protection for residents and visitors in Ramsey County's community areas, parks, and facilities that are vulnerable to tornados, windstorms, and summer weather hazards.This mitigation action addresses the vulnerability of overhead utility lines in high ice and snow.This mitigation action addresses the problem of outages impacting critical infrastructure, such as emergency services, healthcare facilities, and communication systems, which rely on continuous power to function effectively. Mitigation Action Name Safe rooms or storm shelter identificationUnderground utility constructionBackup generator needs Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Ramsey CountyRamsey CountyRamsey County County Action Number 313233 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 157 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status Not StartedNot StartedNot Started Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYes 74 eratures, creating or lightning to the mitigation strategy aims, during times How does the action solve the problem?This mitigation strategy aims to reduce the effects of extreme heat by implementing measures that enhance urban cooling and reduce heat absorption. Key initiatives include installing permeable paving to improve stormwater management and reduce surface tempgreenways and planting trees to provide natural shade and lower ambient air temperatures. Additionally, the use of white or reflective roofs on buildings will help minimize heat absorption and reduce energy consumption for cooling.This of drought, to promote water conservation measures to the residents of Ramsey County through social media during periods of drought.This mitigation strategy, over the next two to three years, aims to identify and prioritize the installation of lightning detection systems in Ramsey County beaches, waterparks, picnic areas, and other open spaces providing an additional means of warning fresidents and visitors of Ramsey County's parks. health, mitigation action What is the problem the action is solving?This mitigation action aims to address the problems of increased risks to public infrastructure, and environmental degradation caused by extreme heat events in Ramsey County.This mitigation action addresses potential water shortages during periods of drought.This addresses the use of lightning detection systems in parks, beaches, and other open spaces due to insufficient warning from lightning strikes in outdoor recreational areas, where users are particularly vulnerable. based - Mitigation Action Name ClimateconstructionWater conservationLightning detection systems Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Ramsey CountyRamsey CountyRamsey County County Action Number 343536 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 158 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status Not StartedNot StartedIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYes made - 75 Conduct study to - municipalities over the easures. Based on this attacks, and evaluate their current - How does the action solve the problem?This mitigation strategy, over the next two to three years, aims to identify Ramsey County's facilities that are the most vulnerable to natural and manhazards, such as flooding, severe storms, or cyberprotective mevaluation, the county can develop targeted mitigation efforts such as infrastructure upgrades, enhanced physical security, and redundant systems to reduce exposure and vulnerabilities.Working with the next two to three years, Ramsey County EMHS will explore participation in FEMA’s Community Rating System (CRS). The Community Rating System is essential for enhancing Ramsey County's resilience by incentivizing proactive floodplain management and hazard mitigation activities.Infrastructure Hardening identify eligible projects and build capacity by mitigating key infrastructure nodes to harden against terrorism and other hazards - essential What is the problem the action is solving?This mitigation action addresses Ramsey County's need to identify and evaluate Ramsey County's critical infrastructure and key resources to exposure to risk and vulnerability, then identify potential mitigation efforts.This mitigation action addresses Ramsey County and its municipalities nonparticipation in FEMA's Community Rating System (CRS) program.This action mitigates the risk of infrastructure failures due to terrorism, natural disasters, or other hazards, ensuring the continuity of services and protecting public safety and the economy. Mitigation Action Name CIKR exposure assessmentsEnrollment in the CRS programInfrastructure Hardening Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Ramsey CountyRamsey CountySaint Paul County Action Number 373839 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 159 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Yes - 76 How does the action solve the problem?Business Continuity Plan Development Assist businesses in developing plans and resources to minimize hazard impacts. Maintain operationsMinimize financialProtect criticalReduce downtimeEnhance resilience What is the problem the action is solving?Business disruptions during and after a hazard by ensuring that businesses can:-during an emergency-losses-assets and resources-- Mitigation Action Name Business Continuity Planning Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Saint Paul County Action Number 40 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 160 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYes y 77 Feature Fountain Pump Pit - Automatic Fire Sprinkler - centives include the requirement to How does the action solve the problem?Chestnut Plaza RelocationEnact Combined Enhanced Fire Safety Ordinances Mitigation Initiativesa. DSI and Mayor’s Intergovernmental Relations personnel should continue to push for the adoption of the most current International Residential Code without anredactions of fire sprinkler requirementsb. OFS, PED, and elected officials should pass an ordinance and make it standard practice that any housing renovations or construction of residential buildings funded in part or in total by city funding or tax ininstall fire sprinkler systems - - inadequate maintenance What is the problem the action is solving?Solves problems related to flooding risks, costs, operational disruptions, safety hazards, and longterm infrastructure sustainability.This initiative addresses fire protection, firerelated injuries and deaths, rapid fire spread, property loss, inconsistent safety standards in publicly funded projects, and outdated fire codes, ultimately improving fire safety and resilience in residential buildings. - Mitigation Action Name Flood Mitigation Chestnut PlazaFire Safety Initiative Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Saint PaulSaint Paul County Action Number 4142 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 161 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYes - up with - 78 Pathway - ional Use Permits), developing Key How does the action solve the problem?Flood Plain Structure Inventory Project Inventory all structures that are at flood risk within the Mississippi River flood plain at Saint Paul. Determine individual Risk Assessments for existing structures.Includes: inventorying (marryingConditContacts Lists, facilitate accomplishment of Flood Response Plans and the creation of maps.Hidden Falls Park Removal/Realignment near low spots along river risk - making in - What is the problem the action is solving?This project addresses problems related to flood risk awareness, preparedness, emergency response coordination, regulatory compliance, and decisionthe floodplain areas of Saint Paul, helping reduce the impacts of flooding on atstructuresThis action solves problems related to flooding, erosion, public safety, high maintenance costs, environmental degradation, and accessibility issues in Hidden Falls Park. - - Mitigation Action Name Flood Mitigation Flood Plain ReviewFlood Mitigation Hidden Falls Park Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Saint PaulSaint Paul County Action Number 4344 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 162 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? Yes Automatic Fire 79 - How does the action solve the problem?Incorporating Fire Sprinkler Technology in New and Existing Buildings Sprinkler Mitigation Initiatives related - fire safety - What is the problem the action is solving?This initiative solves problems related to inadequate fire protection, high fire risk in public buildings, limited public awareness, postrebuilding, legislative barriers, and financial constraints, ultimately improving fire safety, reducing firedamage, and promoting community resilience. Mitigation Action Name Fire Safety Initiative Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Saint Paul County Action Number 45 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 163 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYes ec - ussions... 80 How does the action solve the problem?Promote the use of Family Emergency Plans, NOAA Weather radios, and Severe Weather Awareness activities... Winter; Promote use of home and auto survival kits and urge public toheed winter weather warnings... Summer;Coordinate with Libraries and Parks & Rfor cooling sites, and urge public to heed winter weather warnings… Terrorism; Educate and disseminate info on "See Something, Say Something campaign, common sense terrorism & CBRNE awareness... EOP and ESF's; CommunityOutreach Education, Planning DiscEconomic Development; Educate citizens on low interest loans for improving structural ability ofhomes & businesses Smoke Detector Education Program Continue to implement smoke detector education and giveaway program economic related injuries - What is the problem the action is solving?Emergency preparedness, public safety, weather resilience, terrorism awareness, community emergency planning, and development by equipping the public with information, tools, and resources to protect themselves, their properties, and their communities from a wide range of hazards.This program addresses problems related to lack of smoke detectors, low public awareness, fireand deaths, improper installation and maintenance, and fire safety gaps in vulnerable communities, ultimately enhancing fire safety and saving lives. Mitigation Action Name Public Outreach & EducationFire Safety Initiative Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Saint PaulSaint Paul County Action Number 4647 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 164 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status In ProgressIn ProgressIn Progress Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYes Pump - 81 Define and develop - Due to persistent flooding – How does the action solve the problem?Upper Landing Feature Fountains (4) Pit RelocationWater Street events, elevate the street in numerous low areas. Finalize plans and completeWatergate Marina new facility electrical and fueling station systems to protect against annual flooding - long term - term resilience - What is the problem the action is solving?Relocating the pump pits for the Upper Landing Feature Fountains solves problems related to flooding, maintenance costs, operational disruptions, safety hazards, and extended downtime, ensuring longfunctionality and safety of the fountains.Reduces flooding, improves public safety, minimizes disruptions, and lowers maintenance costs, ensuring term resilience for Water Street.This action solves problems related to flooding vulnerability, operational disruptions, high maintenance costs, safety risks, and environmental hazards, ensuring the longand safety of Watergate Marina's electrical and fueling systems. - - Mitigation Action Name Flood Mitigation Upper LandingFlood MitigationFlood Mitigation Watergate Marina Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Saint PaulSaint PaulSaint Paul County Action Number 484950 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 165 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status Not StartedNot Started Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYes This – 82 Utility Protection & - How does the action solve the problem?City House Building Sewage Ejector RelocationCommunity Rating System Project voluntary program recognizes and encourages community floodplain management activities exceeding the minimum National Flood Insurance Program standards. This action tailors Saint Paul’s own particular hazards, character, and goals. The city implementing standards in turn ultimately leads to discounted premiums rates. disruptions, compliance with - What is the problem the action is solving?Improves resilience against flooding, prevents sewage issues, protects utilities, minimizes service and enhances public health and safety.The CRS Project addresses problems related to inadequate floodplain management, high insurance costs, flood vulnerability, community engagement, and nonbest practices, ultimately enhancing flood resilience in Saint Paul and reducing insurance premiums for its residents. - Mitigation Action Name Flood MitigationFlood Mitigation Flood Plain Review Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Saint PaulSaint Paul County Action Number 5152 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 166 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Not Started Yes 83 Fishing Pier needs to be – Crosby Bog Walk repositioned during high water events damage, Repositioning the fishing pier during high water events addresses problems related to flooding, structural public safety, accessibility, and maintenance costs, ensuring continued safe use of the pier. - Flood Mitigation Crosby Park Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Saint Paul County 53 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 167 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status Not StartedNot Started Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYes 84 Add more - owned river or critical - failure City - How does the action solve the problem?Develop alternate transportation plan for postbridge failure or damageHarriet Island Public Dock structural support related to debris entanglement to reduce repetitive costs for contract debris anddredging - damage, action solves What is the problem the action is solving?This problems related to transportation disruption, emergency response delays, economic impact, public safety, traffic congestion, and commuter accessibility, ensuring continued movement and safety after a critical bridge failure.This action addresses problems related to debris entanglement, high maintenance costs, dock operational disruptions, and environmental impacts, ultimately improving the longterm functionality and sustainability of the Harriet Island Public Dock - Mitigation Action Name Emergency Evacuation PlanningFlood Mitigation Harriet Island Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Saint PaulSaint Paul County Action Number 5455 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 168 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status Not StartedNot StartedNot Started Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesNoYes 85 Bridge Deflector Project - Utilize current data and - How does the action solve the problem?Localized NOAA Atlas 14 Map Assessment Update Project provide updated assessment for Saint Paul flood plain.Mechanical gate used as a levee system to block water from infrastructureRaspberry Island needed. Develop plan and complete programming and construction up - flood - term - compliance, and - What is the problem the action is solving?This project solves problems related to outdated flood data, inaccurate floodplain boundaries, ineffective mitigation planning, regulatory nonhigher insurance costs, improving flood risk management and resilience in Saint Paul.The mechanical gate prevents water entry, reducing the need for expensive postrepairs and cleanefforts. The mechanical gate helps ensure continuous operations by preventing water intrusion.Addresses problems related to erosion, structural damage, navigation hazards, maintenance costs, public safety, and environmental protection, ensuring the longresilience of the bridge and surrounding area. - - Mitigation Action Name Flood Mitigation NOAA Data UpdateFlood Mitigation Mechanical GateFlood Mitigation Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction Saint PaulSaint PaulSaint Paul County Action Number 565758 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 169 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Progress Action Status Not StartedIn Not StartedNot StartedNot StartedNot StartedNot Started Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesYesYesYesYesYesYes - 86 Determine FEMA re - How does the action solve the problem?West Levee certification and PAL statusProtect the City’s municipal water supply from contaminationDevelop safe policies, procedures and facilities to reduce injuries and losses resulting from severe weatherIncrease fire flow capacity of water main, provide sufficient water to the publicIncrease the amount of storm water removed from surface grade during rain eventsLocate and create facilities capable of providing protection against likely hazards Identify and construct optimal safe structures to protect against probable hazardsPrevent failure of control systems for water treatment facilities and municipal wells 3, 4, & 5 What is the problem the action is solving?This project solves problems related to outdated data, inaccurate flood risk assessments, ineffective planning, regulatory compliance, and insurance pricing, improving overall flood resilience in Saint Paul.The City's main water supply is not sufficiently protected from contamination.Lack of safe policies and procedures during severe weatherLack of sufficient flow capacity of water mainsStormwater overflows existing capacity to carry surface water.A lack of safe spaces against hazards for local populations. A lack of prevention/protection measures against vulnerabilities of municipal weather systems. - Mitigation Action Name Flood Mitigation West LeveeWater Supply ProtectionSevere Weather ProtocolsFire Flow Capacity ExpansionSurface Stormwater MitigationSafe Space DevelopmentControl System Hardening Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Anthony Jurisdiction Saint PaulSt. AnthonySt. AnthonySt. AnthonySt. AnthonySt. AnthonySt. County Action Number 59606162636465 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 170 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status Not StartedNew ActionNew Action Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? YesNoNo y 87 ng for natural absorption. on training and exercises to build - How does the action solve the problem?Prevent inflow and infiltration into sanitary sewer, prevent sanitary sewer system backupsIdentify priority urban areas with high heat island effects to develop green spaces, such as parks, green roofs, and shaded corridors. This project will involve planting native trees, installing permeable surfaces, and creating shaded recreational areas. Bincreasing vegetation cover, this action will help lower temperatures, improve air quality, and reduce energy demands for cooling. Additionally, green spaces can enhance stormwater management, reducing the risk of flooding during heavy rainfall by allowiThis action would equip businesses with the knowledge, tools, and training needed to prepare for, respond to, and recover from various hazards. The program would use educational materials from Ready.gov, facilitate business continuity assessments, guide program planning, and provide handsresilience within the business community. - - caused stability. - sized - What is the problem the action is solving?Inflow and infiltration into sanitary sewers, leading to sewer system backupsAddresses the problem of urban heat islands, where densely developed areas experience higher temperatures due to minimal vegetation and heatretaining surfaces. Many small and mediumbusinesses in Ramsey County lack adequate preparedness for natural, technological, or humanhazards, leaving them vulnerable to disruptions that could jeopardize their longterm viability and impact the county’s economic Mitigation Action Name Sanitary Sewer Inflow/Infiltration MitigationUrban Green Space InitiativeBusiness Resilience Preparedness Initiative Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Anthony Jurisdiction St. AllAll County Action Number 666768 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 171 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status New ActionNew Action Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? NoNo al messages 88 assess current internal How does the action solve the problem?This action will communication methods to identify gaps in cultural competency, especially regarding hazard information dissemination. By identifying barriers and recommending inclusive communication practices, the audit will help ensure that hazardreach and resonate with all community members.This action would deliver targeted education and outreach to the senior population, focusing on hazard awareness, preparedness actions, and mitigation strategies. This initiative includes informational sessions, accessible resources, and guidance on personpreparedness actions, such as emergency supply kits, evacuation plans, and home adaptations to mitigate hazard risks. . ss could caused - What is the problem the action is solving?Hazard education, outreach, and public warning efforts in Ramsey County may not fully address the diverse cultural, linguistic, and accessibility needs of its population, leading to ineffective communication and reduced preparedness for certain communitiesSeniors in Ramsey County may be more vulnerable to the impacts of natural, technological, and humanhazards due to physical limitations, limited access to emergency information, and specific medical or mobility needs. Limited awareness or preparedneheighten their risk in disaster situations. Mitigation Action Name Cultural Competency Communication Audit Senior Hazard Awareness and Preparedness Outreach Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction AllAll County Action Number 6970 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 172 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Action Status New Action Is this a continuing action from 2019 plan? No income, - 89 prone areas, such as low - ly, and disabled residents, allowing the How does the action solve the problem?This action will update FEMA flood maps to reflect current floodplain boundaries and assess structures at risk of flooding. Simultaneously, the project will map the locations of vulnerable populations within the floodeldercounty to prioritize resources and develop targeted outreach and evacuation plans. What is the problem the action is solving?Current FEMA flood maps may not accurately reflect actual floodplain boundaries in Ramsey County, potentially leaving residents and businesses unprepared for flooding events. Additionally, vulnerable populations who are more likely to be impacted by flooding are not identified, which limits the county’s ability to provide targeted support and resourcesduring flood events. - Mitigation Action Name Enhanced Flood Risk Mapping and Vulnerable Population Assessment (EFRMVPA) Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Jurisdiction All County Action Number 71 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 173 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Projects Potential Funding Sources County, municipal fundingCounty, municipal fundingCounty, municipal fundingCounty, municipal fundingCounty, municipal fundingCounty fundingCounty/City Budgets, MnDOT,Possible MN DNR Flood Hazard Grants or FEMA HMA grant for Localized Flood Reduction / Infrastructure RetrofitCounty, municipal funding, Possible FEMA HMA grant for Safe RoomsCounty, municipal funding 90 Support Agencies Rec, Emergency Responsible Agency Ramsey County Management & Homeland Security (RCEMHS) & Municipal Emergency Management Agencies (EMAs)RCEMHS, RC Conservation District & Local City planning depts.RCEMHS, Municipal EMAs local city planning depts.RCEMHS & Municipal EMAsRCEMHS, RC Property Management & Municipal EMAsRCEMHS in coordination with Ramsey County Community and Economic Development and local municipal administrators, Planning & Zoning CommitteesRC Public Works, City Public Works, MnDOT, Watershed Districts,RCEMHS, RC Parks & Rec,Municipal parks & rec, and EMAsRCEMHS, RC Parks & Municipal parks & rec, and EMAs Additional Goals Goal #4 Main Goal Goal #4Goal #1Goal #1Goal #1Goal #3Goal #1Goal #1Goal #3Goal #1 Weather Additional Hazards Mitigated Winter Weather HazardsWinter Hazards Implementation Information – Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated All HazardsDroughtFloodingSummer Weather HazardsSummer Weather HazardsAll HazardsFloodingSummer Weather HazardsSummer Weather Hazards IMPLEMENTATION INFORMATION County . Mitigation Strategy 2 30 . 8 . Action Number 123456789 4 Table Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 174 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Electric Company Potential Funding Sources County, municipal funding, Possible FEMA HMA grant for GeneratorsCounty, municipal fundingCounty/City Funding, Possible FEMA HMA grant for Property Acquisition & Structure Demolition or RelocationCounty, municipal funding, DNR Flood Mitigation Grant, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Possible FEMA HMA grant for Property Acquisition & Structure Demolition or RelocationCoop / funding, Possible FEMA HMA grant for Infrastructure RetrofitCounty, municipal fundingCounty, municipal fundingMDH Source Water Protection grant funding for wellhead improvement projects 91 Support Agencies RCEMHSRC Public Works, MN Dept. of Health and local city public works depts. Responsible Agency RCEMHS, RC Property Management & Municipal EMAsRCEMHS & Municipal EMAsRC Public Works, RC Conservation District, and municipal planning/public worksRCEMHS, RC Public Works, RC Property Management, RC Conservation District, municipal EMARC Public Works, Municipal Public Works in cooperation the appropriate utility company.RC Public Works & Municipal Public WorksMunicipal EMAsRC Public Works, MN Dept. of Health and local city public works depts. Additional Goals Goal #4 N/Anone Main Goal Goal #3Goal #2Goal #1Goal #1Goal #1 Goal #1Goal #1 Additional Hazards Mitigated Winter Weather Hazards Winter Weather Hazards Summer Weather HazardsNone Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - Hazards | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated Summer Weather HazardsAll FloodingFloodingSummer Weather HazardsWinter Weather HazardsTornado and WindstormFlooding County Action Number 1011121314151617 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 175 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Potential Funding Sources County funding 92 Support Agencies Ramsey County EmergencyCommunications Center (ECC), municipal EMAs Responsible Agency Ramsey County EMHS Additional Goals Goal 2 Main Goal Goal 1 Additional Hazards Mitigated Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated All Hazards County Action Number 18 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 176 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Potential Funding Sources County funding 93 Support Agencies Responsible Agency Ramsey County Community and Economic Development Additional Goals Goal 3 Main Goal Goal 1 Additional Hazards Mitigated Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated All Hazards County Action Number 19 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 177 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Share - funding Potential Funding Sources County fundingCounty funding, municipal funding, MHP owner County fundingCounty fundingCounty funding, municipal funding, SWCD State CostProgram, FEMA HMA grants, USDA grants, watershed fundingCounty funding, municipal fundingCounty, Twin Cities Public Television (TPT)County funding Public municipal Ramsey County - 94 Support Agencies Ramsey County PropertyManagement, Parks & Rec, Saint Paul/Ramsey CountyPublic Health, EMAs, school districtsMunicipal EMAs, manufacturedhome park ownersRamsey County CPRRamsey County ISRamsey County Works, Parks & Recreation, Soil & Water Conservation District, municipal EMAs, local watershedsMunicipal EMASaint PaulPublic Health (SPRCPH) in partnership with Twin Cities Public Television (TPT), Ramsey County EmergencyCommunications Center (ECC); Ramsey County Communications & Public Relations (CPR) Responsible Agency Ramsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHS Ramsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHS Additional Goals Goal 2Goal 2Goal 4Goal 1, Goal 2Goal 2, Goal 3Goal 1, Goal 2Goal 2, Goal 3 Main Goal Goal 1Goal 1Goal 1Goal 3Goal 1Goal 4Goal 4Goal 1 Additional Hazards Mitigated Summer Weather Hazards,Winter Weather HazardsSummer Weather Hazards,Winter Weather Hazards Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated Tornado and WindstormTornado and WindstormAll HazardsAll HazardsGeological HazardsFloodingAll HazardsAll Hazards County Action Number 2021222324252627 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 178 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Potential Funding Sources Ramsey County Soil & Water Conservation funding, other watershed funding, private funding 95 Support Agencies Local watersheds Responsible Agency Ramsey County Soil & Water Conservation Additional Goals Main Goal Goal 1 Additional Hazards Mitigated Geologic hazards Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated Flooding County Action Number 28 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 179 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Potential Funding Sources County funding 96 Support Agencies Saint Paul/Ramsey CountyPublic Health, municipal EMAs, school districts Responsible Agency Ramsey County EMHS Additional Goals Goal 1, Goal 2 Main Goal Goal 4 Additional Hazards Mitigated DroughtFloodingGeologic hazardsTornado and windstormsWinter weather hazards Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated Summer Weather Hazards County Action Number 29 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 180 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Potential Funding Sources County funding 97 Support Agencies Ramsey County GIS Responsible Agency Ramsey County EMHS Additional Goals Goal 3 Main Goal Goal 1 Additional Hazards Mitigated Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated Flooding County Action Number 30 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 181 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 (LETPP) Potential Funding Sources County fundingUtility company funding, FEMA HMA grantsCounty fundingCounty fundingCounty funding, watershed fundingCounty fundingCounty fundingCounty funding, municipal fundingAnnual Operating Budgets and Law Enforcement Training and Terrorism Prevention grants Municipal Public 98 Support Agencies Ramsey County Parks & Rec,Ramsey County PropertyManagementRamsey County Public Works, Works, utility companiesRamsey County PropertyManagementRamsey County Public Works,Ramsey County Property ManagementRamsey County Soil & Water,local watershedsRamsey County Parks & RecRamsey County departments andagenciesMunicipal EMAsParks County EMHS Responsible Agency Ramsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHS Ramsey County EMHSRamsey County EMHSRamsey Emergency Management, Police, Public Works & Regional Water Additional Goals Goal 2Goal 2Goal 2, Goal 3 Goal 1, Goal 2Goal 2, Goal 3 Main Goal Goal 1Goal 3Goal 3Goal 1Goal 4Goal 1Goal 3Goal 4Goal 1 Weather Additional Hazards Mitigated Summer HazardsWinter weather hazards; Tornados Winter weather hazards; Tornados Infrastructure Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated Tornado and WindstormSummer Weather HazardsSummer Weather HazardsSummer Weather HazardsDroughtSummer Weather HazardsAll HazardsFloodingFlooding County Action Number 313233343536373839 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 182 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 private - Potential Funding Sources Annual Operating Budget; publicpartnerships; grantsAnnual Operating Budget; grant funding (FMA)Grant funding, Annual Operating BudgetAnnual Operating Budget, Federal USACE funding, grant funding (FMA)Annual Operating Budget; grant funding (HMA) 99 Support Agencies PEDPW EM, Parks, PW Responsible Agency Emergency Management, Police, MNDoT & Public WorksP&RFD, DSIDSIP&R Additional Goals Main Goal Safety Additional Hazards Mitigated Fire Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated All HazardsFloodingAll HazardsFloodingFlooding County Action Number 4041424344 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 183 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Potential Funding Sources Grant funding, Annual Operating Budget 100 Support Agencies MN VOADs Responsible Agency FD, DSI Additional Goals Main Goal Additional Hazards Mitigated Fire Safety Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated All Hazards County Action Number 45 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 184 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Operating Potential Funding Sources Annual OperatingBudgetGrant funding, partnership with Red CrossAnnual Operating Budget; grant funding (FMA)Annual Operating Budget; transportation fundingAnnual Operating Budget; grant funding (FMA)Annual Operating Budget; grant funding (FMA)Annual Operating Budget, Federal grant fundingAnnual Operating Budget; grant funding Annual Budget, various grant programs,Annual Operating Budget; transportation fundingAnnual Operating Budget, Federal grant fundingGrant fundingAnnual Operating Budget, grant funding, transportation funding 101 Support Agencies Department PIOsDSI, Red CrossPWPWEMPWEM Responsible Agency EM & topicrelateddepartmentsandorganizationsFDP&RPWP&RP&RDSIP&RPWP&RDSIPWP&R and PW Additional Goals Main Goal Additional Hazards Mitigated Fire SafetyInfrastructure Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated All HazardsAll HazardsFloodingFloodingFloodingFloodingFloodingFloodingInfrastructure FailureFloodingFloodingFloodingFlooding County Action Number 46474849505152535455565758 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 185 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 c Potential Funding Sources Annual Operating Budget, Federal USACE funding, grant funding(FMA)Utility feesCounty/municipal fundingCounty/municipal fundingCounty/municipal fundingGrantsUtility feesCounty/municipal fundingRamsey County's Site Assessment Grants (SAG), Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Redevelopment Grant, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service Urban and Community Forestry Program, National Oceanic and AtmospheriAdministration (NOAA) Community Heat Resilience Grants Department 102 Support Agencies PWPublic Works Department, Environmental Health Department, Community & Economic Development Department, and the Public Health Anthony Public Works Responsible Agency DSISaint Anthony Public WorksSaint Anthony Fire DepartmentSaint Anthony Public WorksSaint Saint Anthony Fire Department; School DistrictSaint Anthony Public WorksSaint Anthony Public WorksRamsey County Parks & Recreation Department 2 Additional Goals Goal 1 Main Goal Goal 3Goal 2Goal 2Goal 3Goal 2Goal 3Goal 3Goal Additional Hazards Mitigated Winter weather hazards, tornadoes and high windsFlooding Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated FloodingFloodingSummer Weather HazardsFloodingFloodingAll HazardsAll HazardsFloodingSummer Weather Hazards County Action Number 596061626364656667 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 186 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Disaster - Aging’s Pre Potential Funding Sources FEMA’s Mitigation (PDM) Program and Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Program, DEED Small Business Assistance Grants, and local foundation (e.g., McKnight)FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Minnesota Department of Public Safety’s Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) grants, and local foundations such as Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationHMGP, BRIC, Minnesota Board on Community Grants, AARP Foundation grantsFEMA’s Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program, BRIC, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Program 103 Support Agencies EMHSD, Public Health Department, and local chambers of commerce and business associationsEMHSD, Public Health Department, and the Human Services DepartmentEMHSD, Human Services Department, and local senior centers and nonprofits (e.g., Meals on Wheels, etc.)EMHSD, Community and Economic Development Department, and the Public Health Department Communications Responsible Agency Ramsey County Economic Development DepartmentRamsey County DepartmentRamsey County Public Health DepartmentRamsey County Public Works Department 2 2 3 Additional Goals Goal Goal Goal 2 4 4 1 Main Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Additional Hazards Mitigated N/A N/A N/A N/A Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - | Multi Main Hazard Mitigated All HazardsAll HazardsAll HazardsFlooding County Action Number 68697071 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 187 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Total 13811118128778139881381512171715121111 Low Medium High Community Action Priority Ranking 1 - Priority2 - Priority3 - Priority 311212111121113132333211 BCA equalMinor Major Benefits Exceed Costs1 - 2 - Exceedance3 - Exceedance 333313111133113132333233 104 Addresses Addresses Number of Hazards the Action Addresses1 - One Hazard2 - More Than One Hazard 211212111121111222222111 Major Potential for Reduced Response Actions1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Potential 112122211221232132333321 Major Potential for Reduced Property Damages 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Potential 213112211122211212331323 Major Potential for Lives Saved1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Potential 211221122221113132333122 3 years3 years5 years5 years3 years5 years5 years5 years3 years5 years3 years ----------- What is the estimated timeline for this action to be implemented?Over 5 years22Over 5 years44Over 5 yearsOver 5 years2Over 5 years4Over 5 yearsOver 5 yearsOver 5 yearsUnder 1 yearOver 5 yearsUnder 1 year4Under 1 year4Under 1 year242 Action Ranking and Prioritization - Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - $750k $750k - - | Multi 250k What is the estimated cost of this action?Under $50kUnder $50kUnder $50kUnder $50kUnder $50kUnder $50kOver $1M$501k Under $50k$Under $50kUnder $50kOver $1MOver $1MUnder $50kUnder $50k$51k to $250k$51k to $250k$51k to $250k$51k to $250kUnder $50k$51k to $250kOver $1MUnder $50k RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION County . Mitigation Strategy 3 31 . 8 . Action Number 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425 4 Table Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 188 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Total 15167814121113126141014148614681410106119967107 Low Medium High Community Action Priority Ranking 1 - Priority2 - Priority3 - Priority 321112133131231121122212111121 BCA equalMinor Major Benefits Exceed Costs1 - 2 - Exceedance3 - Exceedance 331133332132311111111111111111 105 Addresses Addresses Number of Hazards the Action Addresses1 - One Hazard2 - More Than One Hazard 221212221112122121122212221121 Major Potential for Reduced Response Actions1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Potential 331131123131321131231113221111 Major Potential for Reduced Property Damages 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Potential 132131321112332131232112221212 Major Potential for Lives Saved1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Potential 331233112132231131132311111131 3 years5 years3 years3 years5 years3 years5 years3 years3 years3 years3 years3 years3 years3 years5 years3 years3 years5 years3 years3 years -------------------- What is the estimated timeline for this action to be implemented?Under 1 year24Under 1 year22424Under 1 year222Over 5 years222Under 1 year24Under 1 yearUnder 1 year2Over 5 years24Under 1 year2Over 5 years2 Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - $1M $50k$50k - | Multi What is the estimated cost of this action?Under $50kUnder $50k$251k to $500kUnder $50k$251k to $500kUnder $50kOver $1M$51k to $250k$751k Under $50k$51k to $250k$51k to $250kUnder $50k$51k to $250kUnder $50kUnder $50kUnder $50kUnder $50k$51k to $250k$251k to $500kUnder Under $50kUnder $50kOver $1M$51k to $250k$51k to $250kUnder Under $50k$51k to $250k$51k to $250k County Action Number 262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 189 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Total 61496111212121211121112151514 Low Medium High Community Action Priority Ranking 1 - Priority2 - Priority3 - Priority 1211122221222222 BCA equalMinor Major Benefits Exceed Costs1 - 2 - Exceedance3 - Exceedance 1311222222223333 106 Addresses Addresses Number of Hazards the Action Addresses1 - One Hazard2 - More Than One Hazard 1221222222222221 Major Potential for Reduced Response Actions1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Potential 1321222222222333 Major Potential for Reduced Property Damages 1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Potential 1321222222222222 Major Potential for Lives Saved1 - Little Potential 2 - Some Potential 3 - Potential 1111222222211333 3 years5 years3 years3 years5 years5 years3 years3 years5 years3 years3 years3 years3 years ------------- What is the estimated timeline for this action to be implemented?Under 1 year24Under 1 year2244224222Under 1 year2 Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan - $500k$500k $1M$1M$1M --- | Multi What is the estimated cost of this action?Under $50kOver $1M$251k to Under $50k$251k to $500k$51k to $250k$751k $751k $251k to $251k to $500k$751k $251k to $500k$51k to $250kUnder $50kUnder $50k$51k to $250k County Action Number 56575859606162636465666768697071 Ramsey Council Packet Page Number 190 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 5.Plan Implementation and Maintenance Maintaining and ensuring the plan is kept up to date are integral components of the hazard mitigation plan life cycle. A structured process for these updates keeps the HMP current, informs any changes in risk, and maintains eligibility to applicable funding sources for Ramsey County and its communities. Plan maintenance will be coordinated by: The Ramsey County Emergency Management Coordinator. The Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan Coordinator, as assigned. The Ramsey County LPT, made up of representatives from each participating jurisdiction in Ramsey County. 5.1 Plan Implementation 5.1.1 FORMAL ADOPTION Formally adopting the Ramsey County HMP secures buy-in, raises awareness of the HMP, and formalizes the HMP’s implementation. Each jurisdiction participating in this plan will adopt it following all jurisdictional procedures. A copy of the generic resolution and the executed copies are included in the appendices. 5.1.2 IMPLEMENTATION Once the plan is adopted, each participating community may begin implementing the hazard mitigation strategy in Section 4 of this document. The mitigation strategy identifies responsible agencies and entities, general timelines, prioritization, and potential funding sources to assist in strategy implementation. 5.1.3 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER COMMUNITY INITIATIVES During the HMP annual review process, each participating municipality will be asked to document how they are utilizing and incorporating the Ramsey County HMP in tandem to their day-to-day operations and planning and regulatory processes. Additionally, each municipality will identify additional policies, programs, practices, and procedures that could be modified to accommodate hazard mitigation actions. Jurisdictions will ensure that mitigation efforts will translate into inclusive actions that enhance culturally competent practices that distribute resources fairly and justly to meet the needs of the whole community. The capabilities identified in in Section 2.10 offer a good starting point for further integration of the hazard mitigation plan into other community mechanisms. 5.1.4 CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Ramsey County and participating jurisdictions are committed to the continued involvement of the public in the hazard mitigation process. Public outreach and dissemination of the HMP will include: Links to the plan on municipal websites of each jurisdiction with that capability. Continued utilization of existing social media outlets to inform the public of natural hazard events. Educate the public via jurisdictional websites on how these applications can be used in an emergency. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 107 Council Packet Page Number 191 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Expansion of outreach engagement strategies and use of alternative media platforms to reach the county’s hard-to-reach, diverse populations. 5.2 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan Ramsey County Emergency Management & Homeland Security (RCEMHS) will manage the maintenance and update of the plan during its performance period. 5.2.1 MONITORING Each year, beginning one year after plan development, Ramsey County and local community representatives will collect and process information from the departments, agencies and organizations involved in implementing mitigation projects or activities identified in their jurisdictional annexes by contacting persons responsible for initiating and/or overseeing the mitigation projects. Efforts will be made to equitably collect data from organizations and agencies serving disproportionately impacted populations. In addition to progress on the implementation of mitigation actions, including efforts to obtain outside funding; and obstacles or impediments to implementation of actions, the information that Planning Partnership representatives shall be expected to document, as needed and appropriate include: Any grant applications filed on behalf of any of the participating jurisdictions. Hazard events and losses occurring in their jurisdiction. Additional mitigation actions believed to be appropriate and feasible. Public and stakeholder input. Fostering of new resilience relationships and partnerships. Evidence of the leveraging and strengthening of social infrastructure, networks and assets. 5.2.2 EVALUATION The evaluation of the mitigation plan is an assessment of whether the planning process and actions have been effective, if the HMP goals are being achieved, and whether changes are needed. The HMP will be evaluated on an annual basis to determine the effectiveness of the programs, and to reflect changes that could affect mitigation priorities or available funding. The status of the HMP will be discussed and documented at an annual plan review meeting of the Planning Partnership, to be held either in person or via teleconference approximately one year from the date of local adoption of this update, and successively thereafter. At least two weeks before the annual plan review meeting, the Ramsey County HMP Coordinator will advise the Planning Partnership of the meeting date, agenda and expectations of the members. The Ramsey County HMP Coordinator will be responsible for calling and coordinating the annual plan review meeting and soliciting input regarding progress toward meeting plan goals and objectives. Plan evaluation will focus on four key areas: Changes in capabilities Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 108 Council Packet Page Number 192 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Changes in hazard threat, vulnerability and consequences Progress on achieving plan goals Monitoring the implementation of the mitigation strategy, including project closeout Ramsey County will utilize an Annual Review Tool to assist in this process. This reporting tool allows for continual tracking of evolving risks to Ramsey County as well as progress toward the mitigation of the risks and impacts on all members of the community. The HMP will also be evaluated and revised following any major disasters, to determine if the recommended actions remain relevant and appropriate. 5.2.3 PLAN UPDATES Local hazard mitigation plans must be reviewed, revised as appropriate, and resubmitted for approval to remain eligible for benefits awarded under the DMA 2000. It is the intent of Ramsey County to update this plan on a five-year cycle from the date of initial plan adoption. Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 109 Council Packet Page Number 193 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Appendix A – Additional Emergency Management Actions Through the process of developing specific actions focused on hazard mitigation, a number of participating jurisdictions identified additional actions that while not directly mitigating hazards, still provide value to the community in the preparedness, response and recovery phases of emergency management. These actions are presented in Table 32. Table 32. Additional Emergency Management Actions Mitigation How does the action solve the Jurisdiction What is the problem the action is solving? Action Name problem? This action solves the problem of having no organized and effective evacuation strategy for Emergency downtown areas during emergencies, ensuring a Assist in development Saint Paul Evacuation well-coordinated response that prioritizes safety, Downtown Evacuation Plan Planning traffic management, and rapid emergency services access. Bridge Infrastructure Failure Improves preparedness, public safety, traffic Infrastructure Plans - Assist in development Saint Paul management, and interagency coordination in Failure Planning of response plans of MnDOT response to bridge infrastructure failures. owned bridges Connect all city facilities to City Hall along with security system cameras and access key cards: develop the ability to provide a secure environment both from an entry access and visual A need to regulate access to government offices St. Anthony CIKR Access standpoint of all city facilities and properties. from a central location. Facilities include water treatment plant, well houses, city hall, fire station, public works, park shelters/ warming houses and storage garage. Arden Hills, North Oaks, Shoreview, Falcon Heights, Continue to ensure the strong Gem Lake, Fire Fire departments oftentimes need to partner and coordination between local fire Little Canada, coordination work together to provide fire service. departments to provide fire Mounds View, protection. New Brighton, North Saint Paul, Lauderdale Develop contingency plans to ensure secure remote Command command center for local A lack of continuity planning related to command St. Anthony Facility emergency responders in case facilities. Continuity of destruction or incapacity of primary facilities or infrastructure Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 Council Packet Page Number 194 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Mitigation How does the action solve the JurisdictionWhat is the problem the action is solving? Action Name problem? Develop safe policies, procedures and facilities to School Threat Lack of safe policies and procedures during school protect students, faculty and St. Anthony Protocols threat incidents. staff in situations with dangerous intruders have entered the campus Disaster Exercise Development Improves preparedness, response, recovery, and - Develop flood recovery and Disaster Saint Paul mitigation efforts for flood disasters by simulating mitigation scenarios and Exercises real-world scenarios in disaster exercises.integrate into disaster exercises This action addresses problems related to Extreme Temperature Shelters vulnerability to extreme temperatures, lack of - Coordinate with the Extreme preparedness, health and safety risks, Department of Parks & Saint Paul Temperature uncoordinated resource allocation, gaps in shelter Recreation (P & R) to identify, Sheltering access, and strain on emergency services, ensuring procure, supplies and plans for safer and healthier outcomes during extreme implementation. weather events. Identify and prioritize an Vadnais acceptable area(s) to house Mass Shelter Providing safe space during evacuation Heights victims during a natural wintertime disaster Threat Identify ongoing concerns and Identification A lack of understanding regarding the vulnerability risks facing facilities and spaces St. Anthony and Risk of public spaces. (schools, parks, etc.) and Assessment identify critical infrastructure (Property) Threat Identify risks and issues Identification preserving safety and security A lack of understanding regarding the vulnerability St. Anthony and Risk to users in parks and of people in LGUs. Assessment associated facilities shared by (People) school district and city (LGUs). Provide traffic control upon Traffic Control Need to provide traffic control during signal failure St. Anthony signal failure by obtaining 50 Signage (e.g., during power outages) temporary, portable stop signs Working in Hazardous Law Environment: Allow our Police LE staff require protection from hazardous working St. Anthony Enforcement Officers functional capabilities conditions. Protectionsin a hazardous or potentially hazardous environment Arden Hills, North Oaks, Continue to update Emergency Shoreview, Operation Plans and Falcon Heights, Emergency COOP/COG plans to ensure Gem Lake, Operations and EOPs and COOP/COG plans are vital to community that they adequately detail the Little Canada, COOP/COG plan readiness for disasters. needed steps to respond to all- Mounds View, updates hazards and ensure continuity New Brighton, of key government functions in North Saint the event of a disaster. Paul, Lauderdale Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 2 Council Packet Page Number 195 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Appendix B– Studies and References Source Use United States Census Population data and statistics Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) Population data and statistics Ramsey County GIS Data and mapping Ramsey County Website County and community data University of Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership Climate data Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Climate data, specific hazards data Participating jurisdictions Community capability inputs 2019 Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation PlanCommunity, hazard and mitigation data Saint Paul Hazard Mitigation Plan Community, hazard and mitigation data FEMADeclared disaster data National Inventory of Dams Dams data Association of State Dam Safety OfficialsDams data United States Drought Monitor Drought data FEMA’s National Risk Index Hazard risk data National Drought Mitigation Center Drought data Drought Impact ReporterDrought impact data National Weather Service Weather hazards data National Flood Insurance ProgramFlood insurance and program data National Centers for Environmental Information Hazard history and impact data National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hazard history and impact data HazusHazard impact data United States Geological Survey Hazard data Ramsey County 2040 Comprehensive LandUse Plan Hazard data Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Hazard data Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Hazard data Weather.gov Hazard data Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology Hazard data Encyclopedia Britannica Hazard data Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 Council Packet Page Number 196 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Appendix C– Sample Adoption (LOCAL GOVERNMENT, INCLUDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS), (STATE) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) ADOPTING THE (TITLE AND DATE OF MITIGATION PLAN). WHEREAS the (local governing body) recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within (local government); and WHEREAS the (local government) has prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan, hereby known as (title and date of mitigation plan) in accordance with federal laws, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended; the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended; and the National Dam Safety Program Act, as amended; and WHEREAS (title and date of mitigation plan) identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property in (local government) from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and WHEREAS adoption by the (local governing body) demonstrates its commitment to hazard mitigation and achieving the goals outlined in the (title and date of mitigation plan). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE (LOCAL GOVERNMENT), (STATE), THAT: Section 1. In accordance with (local rule for adopting resolutions), the (local governing body) adopts the (title and date of mitigation plan). While content related to (local government) may require revisions to meet the plan approval requirements, changes occurring after adoption will not require (local government) to re-adopt any further iterations of the plan. Subsequent plan updates following the approval period for this plan will require separate adoption resolutions. ADOPTED by a vote of ____ in favor and ____ against, and ____ abstaining, this _____ day of ___________, ______. By: _________________________________ (print name) ATTEST: By: _________________________________ (print name) APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _________________________________ (print name) Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 Council Packet Page Number 197 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Appendix D –Planning Process Documentation Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 Council Packet Page Number 198 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 From:Kyle Karsjen To:Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; Mayer, Bryan L; Kymmie Scott; Kerry Evans; Jessica Henry; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org Cc:Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update - Planning Meeting #1 Start:Thursday, June 13, 2024 12:00:00 PM End:Thursday, June 13, 2024 2:00:00 PM Location:Microsoft Teams Meeting The first meeting of the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan update process will be held Thursday, June 13 at 1 PM. The meeting will be held virtually via Microsoft Teams – the login information is below. At this meeting, we will discuss: *Hazard mitigation planning and why it is important *The hazard mitigation plan update process and schedule *The role of communities in hazard mitigation planning *Capabilities assessment *Reporting on 2019 hazard mitigation actions *Public participation ALL jurisdictions are encouraged to participate. If you are unable to attend this meeting yourself, please forward it to someone else from your jurisdiction who can sit in for you. If you have any questions, please let me know at kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com <mailto:kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com> or 515-460-4711, or contact Bryan Meyer at brian.meyer@co.ramsey.mn.us <mailto:brian.meyer@co.ramsey.mn.us> or 651-266-1017. Kyle ________________________________________________________________________________ Microsoft Teams Need help? <https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting?omkt=en-US> Join the meeting now <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup- join/19%3ameeting_MmI5MGYwNWMtNjQ1Yy00YzRiLTkzMDItODc1M2EzNTVkZjYx%40thread.v2/0? context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae-3622c748f8ed%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%223f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59%22%7d> Meeting ID: 243 061 722 000 Passcode: pvgPYv ________________________________ Dial in by phone +1 914-294-5479,,929315462# <tel:+19142945479,,929315462> United States, Yonkers Find a local number <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/f9a8d180-71df-478e-aaf7-54711b1b13cb?id=929315462> Phone conference ID: 929 315 462# For organizers: Meeting options <https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=3f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59&tenantId=f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae- 3622c748f8ed&threadId=19_meeting_MmI5MGYwNWMtNjQ1Yy00YzRiLTkzMDItODc1M2EzNTVkZjYx@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en- US> | Reset dial-in PIN <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/usp/pstnconferencing> ________________________________________________________________________________ Council Packet Page Number 199 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Kickoff Meeting – Thursday, June 13, 2024 – 1 p.m. – 2 p.m. CT Last Name First Name Representing Contact Brosnahan David Roseville David.Brosnahan@cityofroseville.com White Bear Christopherson Pat pat.christopherson@whitebeartownship.org Township Diaz Izzy St. Anthony izzy.diaz@savmn.com Ramsey Freed Judd Judd.freed@ramseycountymn.gov County Vadnais Hearden Chris christopher.hearden@cityvadnaisheights.com Heights Vadnais Krause Nick nate.krause@cityvadnaisheights.com Heights Lawrence Melissa Gem Lake melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org Lovas Mike St. Paul Mike.lovas@ci.stpaul.mn.us Ramsey Mayer Bryan bryan.mayer@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US County White Bear Peterson Greg gpeterson@whitebearlake.org Lake Vadnais Richter Mike mike.richter@cityvadnaisheights.com Heights Arden Hills, SatherMattNorth Oaks & msather@ljfd.org Shoreview Schroeder Ryan Maplewood ryan.schroeder@maplewoodmn.gov Sieben Terry St. Paul terry.sieben@ci.stpaul.mn.us Smiley Don Little Canada don.smiley@littlecanadafire.org Zender Ben Mounds View ben.zender@moundsviewmn.org Karsjen Kyle Tidal Basin kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com Evans Kerry Tidal Basin kerry.evans@tidalbasingroup.com Henry Jessica Tidal Basin jessica.henry@tidalbasingroup.com Scott Kymmie Tidal Basin kymmie.scott@tidalbasingroup.com 1 Council Packet Page Number 200 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Agenda / Discussion Welcome and Introductions -Kyle Karsjen, Tidal Basin Project Manager welcomed the group and asked attendees to sign in via Teams Chat, leaving their name, title, jurisdiction, phone, and email. He introduced himself and the team. The meeting was recorded. -Judd Freed and Bryan Mayer from Ramsey County also welcomed the group and thanked them for their participation, noting that this is the first time the City of St. Paul was participating in the multijurisdictional plan. Judd hopes this updated plan will not be just aspirational, but truly actionable. Bryan will be the primary point of contact for the County. Meeting Purpose: Update the Ramsy County Hazard Mitigation Plan Kyle discussed the purpose for the plan update, explaining FEMA’s requirements for Hazard Mitigation Plans and the five-year life cycle of FEMA approval. The previous plan was approved by FEMA in 2019. Kyle defined hazard mitigation and explained what a hazard mitigation plan is and does. A hazard mitigation plan: -Helps a community assess its level of capability in a disaster. -Helps a community conduct a data-driven review of their hazards, vulnerabilities, and risks. -Helps a community develop a hazard mitigation strategy. o What can we do? How can a community build off the capabilities in place to buy down the level of risk and vulnerability identified in the plan? o A hazard mitigation strategy can include things like building a flood wall, removing brush off wooded areas to remove some of the risk of forest fire, building earthquake-resistant structures, and removing structures from the floodplain, for example. What is Hazard Mitigation? Kyle spoke about what is covered in a hazard mitigation program and taking sustained actions to mitigate against the hazards. Mitigation takes place at the beginning and the end of the disaster process. It breaks the cycle of damage and repair in hazardous areas. He spoke about why hazard mitigation is important, including gaining eligibility for hazard mitigation funding sources. Kyle covered the mission areas of emergency management and where hazard mitigation fits in, at both the beginning and end of the emergency management cycle. What is a Hazard Mitigation Plan? Hazard Mitigation is a comprehensive process that allows the participating jurisdictions to answer: o Who are we? o What are our current community capabilities? 2 Council Packet Page Number 201 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 o What are our hazards and risks? o What can we realistically do to mitigate those risks? - Hazard Mitigation Plans: o Guide community hazard mitigation actions o Are created with the whole community o Are comprehensive and data driven. o Ensures eligibility for hazard mitigation funding sources. Major Focus Areas of the Update - Reporting on community progress - Updating community and hazards information where needed - Additional climate change focus - Meaningfully include underserved communities in the planning process - Reviewing and tightening the hazard mitigation strategy Planning Process Overview - Phase 1 – Kickoff and Community Reporting o Kyle outlined the participating jurisdictions, the community benefits from participation, and the requirements for participation, listed below: Attend planning meetings and participate in the process. This meeting serves as the first of 3 planning meetings. Identify/update status of community capabilities. Update status of any previous hazard mitigation actions. Share public survey and public review drafts. Develop at least one new or continuing hazard mitigation action. Review and provide input on the plan and plan elements. Adopt the plan once approved by FEMA. o Public Outreach Public Survey Traditionally Underrepresented Populations Engagement Public Review Draft - Phase 2 – Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Tidal Basin will conduct an analysis on the following hazards: Animal Infectious Disease Dam/levee failure CBRNE/Terrorism Earthquake Cyber Attack Extreme temperatures Civil Unrest Flooding 3 Council Packet Page Number 202 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Hazardous MaterialsSupply Chain Disruption Human Infectious DiseasesTornado and High Wind Events Invasive SpeciesUtility Failure Slope FailureWildland Fire Summer Storm EventsWinter Storm Events Each hazard listed will have a hazard analysis and a risk assessment and will be ranked in order of threat, vulnerability and impact. -Phase 3 – Develop a Mitigation Strategy o Following the identification of capabilities and the analysis of hazards, the planning team and participating jurisdictions will work to identify mitigation actions that will buy down identified levels of risk. Each participating jurisdiction will be required to have at least one hazard mitigation action that they support. -Phase 4 – Plan Review and Approval o Kyle went over the review processes with the planning committee, public review, state review, and finally FEMA review. Immediate Next Steps -Community Reporting o Kyle discussed initial community reporting that each jurisdiction must submit. Jurisdictions will be asked to review and update their community capabilities assessment, as well as provide information on the status of projects identified in the 2019 hazard mitigation strategy. Tidal Basin will follow up with a separate email sent to each of the jurisdictional representatives identified in a community’s Letter of Intent to Participate. Forms will be sent no later than end of day, Monday, June 17, and reporting will be due June 28, 2024 -Public Engagement o The survey will be open to all members of the public. The response period for this will be June 24 through July 12. o Once the first draft of the plan update is completed, Tidal Basin will work with jurisdictions to post a public review draft in multiple public places, complying with jurisdictional rules on notifying the public and gaining their input. Future Steps -Planning Meeting #2 – NLT July 31 -HIRA Update – NLT August 30 -Planning Meeting #3 – August/September -Draft Mitigation Strategy – NLT September 30 -Plan Finalization and Review – NLT November 30 -Plan Approval and Adoption – NLT December 31 4 Council Packet Page Number 203 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 From:Kyle Karsjen To:Kymmie Scott; Kerry Evans; Jessica Henry; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; Mayer, Bryan L; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Cc:Jennifer Minwegen; Paul Peltier Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Meeting #2 Start:Tuesday, July 30, 2024 9:00:00 AM End:Tuesday, July 30, 2024 11:00:00 AM Location:Microsoft Teams Meeting The second meeting of the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan update process is scheduled for July 30, 2024 at 10 AM CT over Microsoft Teams. During this meeting, we will review Tidal Basin’s initial findings for the updated risk assessment and discuss feedback and insights that the planning team can provide to ensure that the risk assessment provides a robust and accurate understanding of risk over the entire planning area. We will also discuss plan goals and begin the formulation of the updated hazard mitigation strategy. Community participation is vitally important to the hazard mitigation planning process. Please plan to attend this meeting, or if you cannot attend, please identify an alternate representative to attend in your place to ensure that your community remains an active part of the process. If you have any questions, please let me (kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com <mailto:kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com> ) or Bryan Mayer (bryan.mayer@co.ramsey.mn.us <mailto:bryan.mayer@co.ramsey.mn.us> ) know. Thank you, and I look forward to talking hazards and risks with everyone on 7/30. Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Policy, Mitigation and Resilience M: 515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com <mailto:kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com> tidalbasingroup.com <https://www.tidalbasingroup.com/> Council Packet Page Number 204 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 ________________________________________________________________________________ Microsoft Teams Need help? <https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting?omkt=en-US> Join the meeting now <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup- join/19%3ameeting_NThlMjU1MzYtODAzZS00NDg2LWJjNDktOTIxZjRkYWY4N2I0%40thread.v2/0? context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae-3622c748f8ed%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%223f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59%22%7d> Meeting ID: 277 310 207 922 Passcode: S7EvuZ ________________________________ Dial in by phone +1 914-294-5479,,935026685# <tel:+19142945479,,935026685> United States, Yonkers Find a local number <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/f9a8d180-71df-478e-aaf7-54711b1b13cb?id=935026685> Phone conference ID: 935 026 685# For organizers: Meeting options <https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=3f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59&tenantId=f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae- 3622c748f8ed&threadId=19_meeting_NThlMjU1MzYtODAzZS00NDg2LWJjNDktOTIxZjRkYWY4N2I0@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en- US> | Reset dial-in PIN <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/usp/pstnconferencing> ________________________________________________________________________________ Council Packet Page Number 205 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Planning Meeting #2 – Tuesday, July 30, 2024 – 10 a.m. – 12 p.m. CT First Last Name Representing Contact Name Brosnahan David Roseville David.Brosnahan@cityofroseville.com Butkowski Heather Lauderdale heather.butkowski@lauderdalemn.org Diaz Israel St. Anthony izzy.diaz@savmn.com Freed Judd Ramsey County Judd.freed@ramseycountymn.gov Hearden Chris Vadnais Heights christopher.hearden@cityvadnaisheights.com Krause Nick Vadnais Heights nate.krause@cityvadnaisheights.com Linder Jim Gem Lake Jim.linder@gemlakemn.org Linehan Jack Falcon Heights jack.linehan@falconheights.org Lovas Mike St. Paul Mike.lovas@ci.stpaul.mn.us Mayer Bryan Ramsey County bryan.mayer@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US Mallinger Jason North St. Paul Jason.mallinger@northstpaul.org Minwegan Jen New Brighton jennifer.minwegen@newbrightonmn.gov Montain Matt Mounds View mmontain@sbmfire.org Peltier Paul White Bear Township paul.peltier@whitebeartownship.org Peterson Greg White Bear Lake gpeterson@whitebearlake.org Richter Mike Vadnais Heights mike.richter@cityvadnaisheights.com Arden Hills, North Oaks Sather Matt msather@ljfd.org & Shoreview Schroeder Ryan Maplewood ryan.schroeder@maplewoodmn.gov Sieben Terry St. Paul terry.sieben@ci.stpaul.mn.us Zender Ben Mounds View ben.zender@moundsviewmn.org Karsjen Kyle Tidal Basin kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com Evans Kerry Tidal Basin kerry.evans@tidalbasingroup.com 1 Council Packet Page Number 206 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Agenda / Discussion Welcome and Project Review - Kyle Karsjen, Tidal Basin Project Manager welcomed the group and asked attendees to sign in via Teams Chat, leaving their name, title, jurisdiction, phone, and email. He introduced himself and the team, and the attendees introduced themselves. The meeting was recorded. - Kyle reviewed the purpose for the plan update, explaining the importance of mitigation. He then provided the plan update status; Task 1 – Project Initiation has been completed. The team is in the process of Task 2 – Capabilities and Hazard Identification which will be the focus of this meeting (Planning Meeting #2). The next meeting (Planning Meeting #3) will focus on mitigation strategies. Once the plan is drafted, it will be provided to the state and then FEMA for review and approval. - After reviewing the participant requirements, Kyle reminded the attendees that each jurisdiction will need to return their capability assessment and mitigation action status worksheets, if they have not already done so. Hazard Review Kyle walked the group through a discussion about each of the identified hazards listed below, including the understanding of the hazard, any updates to the hazard history since 2019, and any local context to provide in the final plan. The HMP will include both a hazard analysis and vulnerability assessment for each hazard. Dam/Levee Failure There are 5 identified dams in the county. Classification: 1 High Hazard, 1, Significant Hazard, and 4 Low Hazard. History: There is no history of dam failures/issues. Impacts: St. Anthony Falls and Coon Dam could have some impact to the county water flow if they fail. Ongoing Strategies: Battle Creek and Ford dams are required to and have EAPs. St. Paul has been involved in some planning efforts, but do not believe Battle Creek has ever conducted an exercise.This dam is the responsibility of the watershed. Drought History: There is some history of drought in the region. Previous droughts have caused stoppage of passenger vessels and impacts to the port. Impacts: In addition, White Bear Lake’s levels can impact recreational and residential used of the lake. There is an ongoing lawsuit regarding White Bear Lake. Ongoing Strategies: Many, if not most, jurisdictions have instituted an even/odd watering schedule for residential use. Only the Governor can completely restrict water usage. 2 Council Packet Page Number 207 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Flood History: MN has received 30 federal disaster declarations due to flooding since 1957. Recent major Ramsey flood occurred in June 2014, July 2011, March 2010, and Sept 2007. Impact: Ramsey is likely to be impacted by riverine and urban flooding. Heavy rains in conjunction with freezing temperatures and snowfall have caused impacts to urban areas. Areas of St. Paul (Water St. area) has low-lying roads, with both a number of local businesses and the Metro Water Treatment Plan have repetitive issues due to flooding and could be good to have a better flood water system considered for this area. Ongoing strategies: There has been planning and additional mitigation strategies conducted for flooding in the county. This has helped mitigate past issues around the airport, Fort Snelling, and other park areas. Geological Hazards (Landslide, Slope Failure, Karst Soils) History: There is a history of small landslides in the county, including in St. Paul and Gem Lake in the past few years. The landslide in St. Paul killed 2 children, and injured 2 more in 2013, when a bluff gave way. The landslide in Gem Lake caused a disruption to the railroad tracks. Impact: Even with some sealing, there are still caves within the rock walls of the bluff which cause confined space issues. Additionally there are a number of old landfill sites which cause issues for development. Ongoing strategies: Standard building permits do require soil analysis in most, if not all, jurisdictions. St. Paul has conducted some mitigation strategies including building a wall to protect from falling rocks. Hazardous Materials (Spills, Pipeline, Trucking, Rail) History: There have been a few major events reported in recent history, in addition many smaller events have occurred which typically have a smaller footprint and don’t require widespread evacuation. Impact: Gem Lake, and other jurisdictions, do not have city water, but utilize private wells. Chemical spills can impact ground water. There are a number of transportation routes (both rail and road) that traverse the county, carrying hazardous materials. Roseville has several fuel tank facilities, with approximately 370 semi trucks coming in and out on a daily basis. Ongoing strategies: There were none identified during this meeting. Summer Weather Hazards (Heat, Hail, Lightning) History: Ramsey County has reported at least $7M in damages due to summer weather events, primarily hail. Hail damage is covered by insurance and is typically underreported publicly. Impact: Due to ongoing climate change, summers are expected to be higher temperatures with increased precipitation. Heat is a growing and significant concern. The population is changing, and recent immigrants are not used to the weather and tend to live with many people in homes without AC. Providing educational information about the impacts is also a challenge due to the number of languages spoken in the county. The unhoused population number is also growing. 3 Council Packet Page Number 208 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Ongoing Strategies: The Twin Cities metro area is starting an experimental program to analyze wet blub impacts. Traditional cooling centers have not been utilized. Public is instructed to use public facilities. The county is starting to look at resilience hubs as a potential mitigation strategy. Tornado and Windstorm History: The largest recorded tornado in the county was in 1965, but given its geography, the county typically experiences straight line winds annually. Impact: Typically there are not long lasting effects from these types of events, but property damage and power outages are always a concern. Ongoing Strategies: 98% of the county is covered by outdoor warning sirens, but the technology is aging. Utility companies tend to maintain trees along major power lines. Small shelters, typically brick restrooms, are available in many public parks. Winter Weather Hazards (Cold, Blizzard, Ice Storm) History: Since 1950, Ramsey County has reported 109 significant weather events. Impact: There is an almost 100% probability of a severe winter storm in a given year, and climate change is expected to result in heavier snowfall and more extreme events, including warmer temperatures. Ongoing concern is not from snowfall, but an ice storm that causes significant and long duration power outages. Ongoing Strategies: Ramsey typically uses a shelter in place strategy during a major winter event, with some facilities open on highways for trucks and passenger vehicles. Infrastructure Failure (Transportation, Electricity and Fuel, Supply Chain Disruption, Water Systems) History: There have been some notable failures in recent history, such as the I-35 bridge collapse in 2007, water contamination in St. Paul in 2017, nationwide supply chain shortages during COVID, and electrical/fuel shortages due to annual winter storms. Impact: Major concerns include aging infrastructure, such as roads and bridges, water infrastructure, and human caused impacts to communications systems and power grids. Ongoing Strategies: These are not traditionally included in hazard mitigation plans as they are more random, without clearly defined areas, and are hard to build resiliency against, unlike most natural hazards. Human Caused Hazards (Terrorism, Active Shooter/Hostile Incidents, Civil Disturbance, Cyber Attack) History: In addition to the incidents presented (cyber-attack in 2020, civil unrest in response to George Floyd killing in 2020, and protests and civil unrest surrounding the 2008 RNC), there have been at least 3-4 major incidents, including officer involved shootings, and the aftermath of presidential election results that need to be included. The county was also recently impacted by a major cyber outage, CrowdStrike. 4 Council Packet Page Number 209 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Impact: Hazards such as cyber attack can impact the county even if they are not located within the county as the city relies on outside services. Civil disturbances have caused damage to property and blocked roads and highways. Ongoing Strategies: These are not traditionally included in hazard mitigation plans as they are more random, without clearly defined areas, and are hard to build resiliency against, unlike most natural hazards. Mitigation Strategy The focus of the next meeting, Kyle started the discussion around mitigation strategies including goals which describe the overall direction of the plan and actions which describe specific activities of projects designed to achieve the goals. Goals Common categories of Mitigation Goals are: public education, policies/planning/training/communication, reduce risk to life and property, and the protection of critical/essential facilities. It was decided to make the 2025 HMP goals more specific than were outlined in the 2019 plan. This will be a discussion item at Meeting #3. Actions These will be partly based on the information provided by each jurisdictions’ Mitigation Action Worksheet for reporting status updates of remaining 2019 actions and the development of any additional mitigation actions. It was noted that each participating jurisdiction must have at least one mitigation action in the plan, and that all jurisdictions that participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) must have an additional action that relates to the continued compliance in the program. Ahead of the next meeting, jurisdictions are encouraged to discuss potential mitigation actions with other representatives in their jurisdiction. Planning Meeting #3 The next planning meeting is set for Tuesday, August 27 at 1pm CT. This will be a virtual meeting focused on mitigation actions, including what actions should be included in the plan update. Next Steps Future Steps - Collect outstanding Capability Assessments and Mitigation Action Status spreadsheets - ASAP - HIRA Update – NLT August 30 - Planning Meeting #3 – August 27 at 1PM CT - Draft Mitigation Strategy – NLT September 30 - Plan Finalization and Review – NLT November 30 5 Council Packet Page Number 210 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 -Plan Approval and Adoption – NLT December 31 6 Council Packet Page Number 211 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 From:Kyle Karsjen To:Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Cc:Christopher Hearden; Jim Lindner Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Meeting #3 Start:Tuesday, August 27, 2024 12:00:00 PM End:Tuesday, August 27, 2024 2:00:00 PM Location:Microsoft Teams Meeting The third and final planning meeting for the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan update will be held Tuesday, August 27th from 1-3 PM via Microsoft Teams. This meeting will focus on mitigation action planning – we’ve identified community capabilities and identified community risks. What actions can each community identify to buy down those levels of risk? We will also use the meeting to button up some final elements of the plan. Please plan to attend this meeting; if you cannot attend, please identify an alternate representative to attend in your place to ensure your community remains up to speed on the planning process. If you have any questions, please contact me at kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com <mailto:kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com> or Bryan Mayer at bryan.mayer@co.ramsey.mn.us <mailto:bryan.mayer@co.ramsey.mn.us> . Thank you, Kyle ________________________________________________________________________________ Microsoft Teams Need help? <https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting?omkt=en-US> Join the meeting now <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup- join/19%3ameeting_NzExN2Q5MTgtMmM2ZS00NGY3LThmOTgtYWZkZWNhNjE4ODk5%40thread.v2/0? context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae-3622c748f8ed%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%223f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59%22%7d> Meeting ID: 233 606 703 437 Passcode: jpZuYv ________________________________ Dial in by phone +1 914-294-5479,,103758743# <tel:+19142945479,,103758743> United States, Yonkers Find a local number <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/f9a8d180-71df-478e-aaf7-54711b1b13cb?id=103758743> Phone conference ID: 103 758 743# For organizers: Meeting options <https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=3f6eb921-0475-4639-8851- cc3c6cbfcf59&tenantId=f009051e-b7f6-444f-87ae- 3622c748f8ed&threadId=19_meeting_NzExN2Q5MTgtMmM2ZS00NGY3LThmOTgtYWZkZWNhNjE4ODk5@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en- US> | Reset dial-in PIN <https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/usp/pstnconferencing> ________________________________________________________________________________ Council Packet Page Number 212 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Planning Meeting #3 – Tuesday, August 27, 2024 – 1 p.m. – 2 p.m. CT First Last Name Representing Contact Name Artig-Swomley Gretchen Gem Lake Bownik Jim Lauderdale Jim.bownik@lauderdalemn.org Brosnahan David Roseville David.Brosnahan@cityofroseville.com Christopherson Patrick White Bear Township pat.christopherson@whitebeartownship.org Hamdorf Trevor New Brighton Trevor.hamdorf@newbrightonmn.gov Hearden Chris Vadnais Heights christopher.hearden@cityvadnaisheights.com Linehan Jack Falcon Heights jack.linehan@falconheights.org Lovas Mike St. Paul Mike.lovas@ci.stpaul.mn.us Mayer Bryan Ramsey County bryan.mayer@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US Mallinger Jason North St. Paul Jason.mallinger@northstpaul.org Montain Matt Mounds View mmontain@sbmfire.org Peterson Greg White Bear Lake gpeterson@whitebearlake.org Arden Hills, North Oaks Sather Matt msather@ljfd.org & Shoreview Schroeder Ryan Maplewood ryan.schroeder@maplewoodmn.gov Sieben Terry St. Paul terry.sieben@ci.stpaul.mn.us Smiley Don Karsjen Kyle Tidal Basin kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com Evans Kerry Tidal Basin kerry.evans@tidalbasingroup.com Henry Jessica Tidal Basin Jessica.henry@tidalbasingroup.com Scott Kymmie Tidal Basin Kymmie.scott@tidalbasingroup.com Agenda / Discussion Welcome and Project Review - Kyle gave a reminder on what hazard mitigation means, and how it relates to the other 1 Council Packet Page Number 213 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 phases of emergency management (preparedness, response and recovery). According to FEMA, hazard mitigation is “any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long- term risk to life and property from hazard events.” Hazard mitigation can also be defined as “any action that breaks the cycle of damage and repair in hazardous areas.” Kyle encouraged communities to keep these definitions in mind as they began updating their hazard mitigation strategies. - Hazard Mitigation is important for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that it ensures eligibility for hazard mitigation funding sources. Risk Assessment Review - Planning Meeting #2 focused on Ramsey County’s vulnerability to each of the listed failures. As a reminder, for a more well-rounded view of hazards, the County has included human-caused and infrastructure failures. - Kyle reviewed information on the risk assessment, including hazards assessed and the risk assessment components (threat, vulnerability, and consequence) - The risk assessment will be provided via email following this meeting for review and comment through Friday, September 13. Kyle encouraged the group to review and provide feedback, noting that communities know and understand their hazards and risks better than anyone, and we want to make sure that the information is included in the updated assessment. Mitigation Strategy Overview - Kyle reviewed the next step in the process – developing a hazard mitigation strategy with mitigation actions from each participating jurisdiction. Based on the risk assessment and available capabilities, the 2025 updated mitigation strategy will align with the County’s mitigation goals and objectives. - This strategy will guide a community’s approach for implementing mitigation activities that are cost effective, technically feasible, and environmentally sound as well as allowing strategic investment of limited resources. - Kyle reminded each jurisdiction that they have a baseline mitigation strategy to work from – the actions each community identified on the mitigation strategy worksheets, during the reporting process in the early summer as continuing in the new plan. - Kyle reviewed the goals for the 2025 hazard mitigation plan update. The goals are: Goal 1: Mitigate impacts to life, property, the economy, and the environment from natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. Goal 2: Build and support local capacity to create resiliency from natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. Goal 3: Build resilience for critical infrastructure and systems against the impacts of natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. Goal 4: Increase outreach and awareness to the whole community to build resilience. 2 Council Packet Page Number 214 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 -Communities were encouraged to focus on hazard mitigation actions when developing and updating their mitigation strategies. - Kyle reviewed the information needed for each carryover and new mitigation action. He also reviewed some helpful hints on what counts as mitigation and what doesn’t. Each action will include the following information to inform development and prioritization: Problem statement/background Method of implementation Hazard(s) to be mitigated Responsible party/parties Estimated costs and benefits Budget range Potential funding sources - Each mitigation action will be scored and ranked in the final plan, based on potential lives saved, potential for reduced property damages, potential for reduced response actions, benefits exceeding costs, and community priority. - Each community has two options when it comes to mitigation planning: Option 1: If a community would like some additional support, Tidal Basin invites you to set up a virtual meeting to further discuss your specific mitigation strategy and potential ideas for additional actions. Option 2: If a community doesn’t need additional support, Tidal Basin will share materials and instructions to submit new mitigation actions. - All updated mitigation strategies and information are due no later than Friday, September 13. Next Steps Tidal Basin - Each community will receive a follow up email NLT end of week regarding information from this meeting. - Email will include current hazard mitigation strategy, instructions on setting up community meetings, instructions to submit new mitigation actions. Communities - Decide whether you want a community meeting. Let us know sooner rather than later. - Review and provide feedback on Draft #1 of Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment. - Update carryover mitigation actions and submit any new mitigation actions NLT Friday, September 13 3 Council Packet Page Number 215 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Timeline for Future Activities - Draft plan compiled – Early October - Draft plan sent to communities for review – Early October - Public review draft – Mid October - State review – Early November - FEMA review – Mid November - FEMA approval – December - Plan adoption – December/January Action Items Task Responsibility Date Provide first draft of hazard analysis and risk Tidal Basin August 30, 2024 assessment Distribute meeting materials and materials for Tidal Basin August 30, 2024 updating community mitigation strategies Complete community meetings Tidal Basin September 11, 2024 Review and provide comment on first draft of Participating September 13, hazard analysis and risk assessment jurisdictions 2024 Provide new mitigation actions and updated Participating September 13, mitigation strategies for each community jurisdictions 2024 4 Council Packet Page Number 216 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 RAMSEY COUNTY, MN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE 2025 Plan Update Goals Goal 1 Mitigate impacts to life, property, the economy and the environment from natural, technological, and human- caused hazards. Goal 2 Build and support local capacity to create resiliency from natural, technological and human-caused hazards. Goal 3 Build resilience for critical infrastructure and systems against the impacts of natural, technological and human- caused hazards. Goal 4 Increase outreach and awareness to the whole community to build resiliency. Council Packet Page Number 217 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Ramsey County, MN Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mitigation Action Planning What does my community need to complete by Friday, September 13? Communities are asked to utilize the excel spreadsheet attached to this document to refine the actions already included, and to add new any mitigation actions as appropriate. Answer the questions at the top of each column for each action added or refined. Please answer every question. Some questions include a drop-down menu where respondents can select from a pre-identified list of answers. Answers do not have to be perfect but should give an idea of the parameters of the mitigation actions. The excel spreadsheet is currently populated with all mitigation actions contained in the 2019 hazard mitigation plan, along with some Tidal Basin recommendations. Why Is mitigation action planning important? Throughout the mitigation planning process, each community has already provided multiple inputs into the process – you’ve reported on the status of your 2019 hazard mitigation actions, you’ve provided an update on community capabilities, and you’ve reviewed and provided comment on the hazard analysis and risk assessment. The next step is mitigation action planning – now that we have a new and better understanding of our risk, what should we do to mitigate the impacts of the hazards to which we are vulnerable? When implemented, a good hazard mitigation strategy effectively buys down risk and is “where the rubber meets the road” in the hazard mitigation plan update. What tools are available to help my community refine mitigation actions and add additional actions to our mitigation strategy? There are a few resources communities should utilize when refining and adding new mitigation actions to their mitigation strategy. Plan Goals – the goals were updated from the 2019 plan update. These goals can be used to generate mitigation actions. A list of the goals can be found here. We also discussed some helpful hints for mitigation action development during our third planning meeting Tuesday, August 27. I encourage you to review that recording if you weren’t able to attend (found here). What do I do if my community is totally lost and needs some additional help? If your community could use some extra help, Tidal Basin is offering to hold 30 – 60 minute virtual meetings to help walk you through the process and provide some additional insights. Virtual meetings can be set up by email Kymmie Scott at kymmie.scott@tidalbasingroup.com. My community provided updates to the projects listed in our strategy from the 2019 plan – why do I have to do anything else? The actions identified by each community in the 2019 plan serve as a baseline for the 2025 update, but communities are asked to review the list again, refine their existing migration actions, and add new ones based on updated hazard and risk information found in the updated plan. Council Packet Page Number 218 of 375 From:Kyle Karsjen To:Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; Mayer, Bryan L; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Cc:Kymmie Scott; Kerry Evans; Jessica Henry Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Survey - please share far and wide Date:Monday, June 24, 2024 1:15:00 PM Attachments:image002.png Ramsey County HMP Survey Flyer.jpg Ramsey County HMP Survey Flyer.pdf image001.jpg Good afternoon, As discussed during our hazard mitigation plan kickoff earlier this month, we are pleased to announce that the public survey intended to gather information from respondents on their experiences, knowledge, and concerns about local hazards as a component of the Ramsey th County Hazard Mitigation Plan is live and will remain open through Friday, July 12. We are asking each community to share the survey far and wide, using whatever methods you would traditionally use to share information with your residents. This can include posting the information on public websites, sharing it through a community’s social media such as Facebook, or utilizing messaging systems to invite the public to complete the survey. Please th share the survey no later than Wednesday, June 26. When you share it, please send screenshots of what you’ve shared to kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com so that we can include those records as part of the plan. Please let me know if your community has any questions on the resources below or need any additional information. The survey can be found at https://forms.office.com/r/tk5ySqn1Ha. I’ve also attached a flyer in both jpeg and adobe pdf you can use as you see fit to share. See below for some sample text that you can use to share the survey: Use or adapt the following when posting or communicating the availability of this survey to the public: Ramsey County has begun the process of updating the 2019 Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) so all municipalities in Ramsey County remain eligible to receive certain types of federal mitigation funding to reduce hazard risk. The HMP focuses on understanding the natural risks and hazards that threaten the county, identifying community capabilities that can be used to mitigate risks, and laying out a comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy to buy down risks from those hazards. Public participation and feedback is an important part of the hazard mitigation planning process. Ramsey County Emergency Management and Homeland Security has developed a brief survey to assist in providing the public with an opportunity to contribute to the plan update. The survey focuses on the public’s experiences with hazards, including recommendations for hazard reduction. The input provided is vital to completing the plan update. All information collected from this survey will be anonymous. Please complete the survey by Council Packet Page Number 219 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Friday, July 12th at: https://forms.office.com/r/tk5ySqn1Ha. Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Policy, Mitigation and Resilience M:515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com Council Packet Page Number 220 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 WE NEED YOUR INPUT!MORRIS COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RAMSEY COUNTY 2024 UPDATE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Ramsey County and participating municipalities are Morris County and participating municipalities are preparing preparing an update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. The goal an update of the Countywide Hazard Mitigation Plan. The of this plan is to identify ways that Ramsey County goal of this plan is to identify ways that Morris County communities can reduce damages from future hazards. communities can reduce damages from future hazards. As part of the planning process, we seek your input on As part of the planning process, we are looking for your input which hazards impact you most and in what ways. on what natural hazards affect you most and how. wğƒƭĻǤ /ƚǒƓƷǤ ƩĻƭźķĻƓƷͲ ƚƩ ǞƚƩƉźƓ ƷŷĻ ĭƚǒƓƷǤͪ ğƉĻ ƚǒƩ ƭǒƩǝĻǤͧ https://forms.office.com/r/tk5ySqn1Ha hƩ {ĭğƓʹ For more information about the hazard mitigation process, please contact: Ramsey County Emergency Management & Homeland Security(RCEMHS) (651) 266-1020 Visit the RCEMHS Website Council Packet Page Number 221 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:mmontain@sbmfire.org; Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Date:Friday, August 30, 2024 2:26:00 PM Attachments:image001.png image004.jpg Good afternoon, and happy long weekend! The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) for Ramsey County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update is ready for review and comment. This draft represents our first stab at reviewing Ramsey County’s hazards and their potential impacts on the community. The draft also includes an initial hazard prioritization based on three factors – threat, vulnerability and consequence. Please note that you have direct control over everything in the HIRA – please provide me any feedback on where we may have gotten something wrong on hazards, or other edits we can make. As you read through the document, I would also be appreciative if you share any additional anecdotal experience you may have with these hazards so that we can add some of that color to the document. The draft HIRA can be found here. Please provide any comments on the document using the comment collection tool, which can be found here. Please input all comments into this form no later than Friday, September 13. If you have any questions or have any issues accessing the document, please let me know. Also as a reminder, the Tidal Basin planners assigned to your communities should have sent the worksheet out to each community this week to develop each community’s mitigation strategy. This information is also due no later than Friday, September 13. Please let us know if we can provide any assistance as you develop your updated mitigation strategy. I hope everyone has a great holiday weekend. Thank you, Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy Council Packet Page Number 222 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 M:515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com Council Packet Page Number 223 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:mmontain@sbmfire.org; Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Subject:RE: Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Date:Friday, September 6, 2024 11:39:00 AM Attachments:image001.png image004.jpg image005.jpg Good afternoon, and happy Friday! This email serves as a reminder of some deadlines coming th up next Friday, September 13: The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) is available for review and comment. Please scroll down to see the links and information for the HIRA, or reference the original email sent Friday, August 30. Updated community hazard mitigation strategy information is also due next Friday. Each community received a specific email tailored to their community, sent Wednesday, August 28. As a reminder, Tidal Basin staff are available to provide support to each community in developing mitigation strategies if needed. Thank you and have a great weekend. Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M:515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com From: Kyle Karsjen Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 2:27 PM Subject: Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Good afternoon, and happy long weekend! Council Packet Page Number 224 of 375 The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) for Ramsey County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update is ready for review and comment. This draft represents our first stab at reviewing Ramsey County’s hazards and their potential impacts on the community. The draft also includes an initial hazard prioritization based on three factors – threat, vulnerability and consequence. Please note that you have direct control over everything in the HIRA – please provide me any feedback on where we may have gotten something wrong on hazards, or other edits we can make. As you read through the document, I would also be appreciative if you share any additional anecdotal experience you may have with these hazards so that we can add some of that color to the document. The draft HIRA can be found here. Please provide any comments on the document using the comment collection tool, which can be found here. Please input all comments into this form no later than Friday, September 13. If you have any questions or have any issues accessing the document, please let me know. Also as a reminder, the Tidal Basin planners assigned to your communities should have sent the worksheet out to each community this week to develop each community’s mitigation strategy. This information is also due no later than Friday, September 13. Please let us know if we can provide any assistance as you develop your updated mitigation strategy. I hope everyone has a great holiday weekend. Thank you, Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M:515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com Council Packet Page Number 225 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:mmontain@sbmfire.org; Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas Subject:RE: Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Date:Thursday, September 12, 2024 8:47:00 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.jpg image003.jpg Good morning! Thank you to those communities who have already sent in their updated strategies, and those communities who have met with us this week to further discuss mitigation action planning. This email serves as a final reminder of some deadlines coming up th tomorrow, September 13: The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) is available for review and comment. Please scroll down to see the links and information for the HIRA, or reference the original email sent Friday, August 30. Updated community hazard mitigation strategy information is also due next Friday. Each community received a specific email tailored to their community, sent Wednesday, August 28. As a reminder, Tidal Basin staff are available to provide support to each community in developing mitigation strategies if needed. Thank you! Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M:515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com From: Kyle Karsjen Sent: Friday, August 30, 2024 2:27 PM Subject: Ramsey County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment - Review Draft Council Packet Page Number 226 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Good afternoon, and happy long weekend! The first draft of the Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) for Ramsey County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update is ready for review and comment. This draft represents our first stab at reviewing Ramsey County’s hazards and their potential impacts on the community. The draft also includes an initial hazard prioritization based on three factors – threat, vulnerability and consequence. Please note that you have direct control over everything in the HIRA – please provide me any feedback on where we may have gotten something wrong on hazards, or other edits we can make. As you read through the document, I would also be appreciative if you share any additional anecdotal experience you may have with these hazards so that we can add some of that color to the document. The draft HIRA can be found here. Please provide any comments on the document using the comment collection tool, which can be found here. Please input all comments into this form no later than Friday, September 13. If you have any questions or have any issues accessing the document, please let me know. Also as a reminder, the Tidal Basin planners assigned to your communities should have sent the worksheet out to each community this week to develop each community’s mitigation strategy. This information is also due no later than Friday, September 13. Please let us know if we can provide any assistance as you develop your updated mitigation strategy. I hope everyone has a great holiday weekend. Thank you, Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M:515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com Council Packet Page Number 227 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:Mayer, Bryan L; Jessica Henry; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas; Christopher Hearden; Jim Lindner Subject:Ramsey County DRAFT Hazard Mitigation Plan for Review - Due Wednesday, October 30 Date:Wednesday, October 16, 2024 12:13:00 PM Attachments:image001.png image004.jpg Good morning! As you know, Ramsey County and its communities have been participating in an update of the county’s hazard mitigation plan. Thank you to everyone who has participated – attending meetings, providing information, updating your hazard mitigation strategies and other actions that have contributed to plan development. We are pleased to share the first full draft of the updated hazard mitigation plan with the Local Planning Team (LPT) and provide a final opportunity for community review and comment. Please read this whole email, as it is each community’s last opportunity to provide review and input on the draft plan before finalization. We ask that communities review two separate documents: Base Plan Hazard mitigation strategy (you only need to review for your community) The deadline for these reviews is no later than 4 PM CT, Wednesday October 30. Base Plan here. The The Base Plan document encompasses the main portions of the plan. It can be viewed base plan includes: Section 1 Introduction and Planning Process Section 2 Community Profile and Capabilities Section 3 Risk Assessment Section 4 Hazard Mitigation Strategy Section 5 Plan Implementation and Maintenance Council Packet Page Number 228 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 You’ll notice a few areas still highlighted in yellow as you read through the document; these are areas where we are still collecting information through the process and will be finalized before the plan goes out for public review. You’ll also notice a few references to appendices; these will be developed with the final draft. Hazard Mitigation Strategy Thank you to each community that submitted updates to its hazard mitigation strategy. Please click this link to access it. It should open up an Excel file with the mitigation strategy for the plan compiled. You only need to review the actions for your community. The strategy contains each mitigation action identified though the update process. Please make sure you review your community’s strategy for accuracy. For most communities, we made some additional edits and added any information that was missing. We also filled in some of the prioritization for each action where it wasn’t provided. If you see anything that we did that you don’t agree with or want me to change, please let me know and I’m happy to do it. In addition to reviewing the document, please let me know if your community has any other hazard mitigation actions you would like to add. We didn’t get many new hazard mitigation actions added during the strategy update process, and we are asking communities to review and provide at least ONE new hazard mitigation action to its strategy if the community hasn’t done so already. There is still time to edit before we finalize the document and send it off to public review. If you’d like any additional support in identifying and adding actions, please let me know. Timeline and Next Steps Please complete a review of this documentation and submit any new mitigation actions no later than 4 PM CT, Wednesday October 30 . Send any feedback on your community information or the base plan to me at kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com. If you have any questions or would like support in adding any more hazard mitigation actions, please let me know. Also please let me know if you have any access issues with the folder and we’ll figure something else out. Once each community has completed its review, the document will go out for public review. We’ll ask for your help in sharing that document. I will send a separate email about that process soon. Thank you, Kyle Council Packet Page Number 229 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Resilience, Mitigation and Policy M:515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com Council Packet Page Number 230 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 From:Kyle Karsjen Bcc:Mayer, Bryan L; Kerry Evans; Kymmie Scott; Artig-Swomley, Gretchen - External Contact; ben.zender; Brosnahan, David; Christopherson, Pat - External Contact; Diaz, Izzy; Hamdorf, Trevor; Hearden, Chris; Butkowski, Heather - External Contact; Jason Mallinger; Linehan, Jack - External Contact; Mondor, Michael; msather; Peterson, Greg; Judd.Freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; Sieben, Terry - External Contact; Don Smiley; melissa.lawrence@gemlakemn.org; Ryan Schroeder; Jim Bownik; Mike Lovas; Christopher Hearden; Jim Lindner; Matt Montain Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Public Review Draft sharing information Date:Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:00:00 AM Attachments:WinterHazardSurveyFlyer-final pdf.pdf social sharing text.docx hazardmitigation-socialmedia-Final.jpg image001.png image002.png Good morning! We are pleased to announce that the Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) draft is now ready for public review. The review period will last until Sunday, December 22. We are asking communities to share the plan draft and opportunity to review using whatever mechanisms you would normally use to share important information. I have attached the following to this email: A flyer has been developed that can be shared that includes the embedded links to the plan and comment sheet (WinterHazardSurveyFlyer-final pdf). This flyer can be shared via email to any of your partners that you think would find value in reviewing the full HMP. If you share the survey via email, please cc me. We’ve developed some materials that can be used to develop a post on social media. I have attached the text that can be used (social sharing text); please ensure that the links transfer to the posting. I have also attached an image that can be used in your post if you wish as well (hazardmitigation-socialmedia-Final). Finally, the plan will be shared on the Ramsey County website and Ramsey County social media channels today. When you do share the document, please remember to send me screenshots of the posting so that I can include it in the plan. If you have any further questions, please let me know. Thanks! Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Policy, Mitigation and Resilience M:515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com Council Packet Page Number 231 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 232 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 sbntfzdpvouz/vt Xf!offe!zpvs!joqvu" Help shape the future of Ramsey County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan. zpv!up!sfwjfx!boe!tibsf!zpvs!uipvhiut/ 1 2 Review the Plan Share Your Feedback Review the plan. Fill out a quick survey. Click the link:Sbntfz!Dpvouz! Click the Link: Ib{bse!Njujhbujpo!Qmbo!—! Sbntfz!Dpvouz!Ib{bse! Qvcmjd!Sfwjfx!Esbgu Njujhbujpo!Qmbo!—!Gffecbdl! Tvswfz Gps!npsf!jogpsnbujpo!bcpvu!uif!ib{bse!njujhbujpo!qspdftt-!qmfbtf!dpoubdu; Sbntfz!Dpvouz!Fnfshfodz!Nbobhfnfou!'!Ipnfmboe!Tfdvsjuz!)SDFNIT* )762*377.2128 cszbo/nbzfsAsbntfzdpvouz/vt Council Packet Page Number 233 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 234 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 235 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 236 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 237 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 238 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 239 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 240 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 241 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 From:Kyle Karsjen Cc:Mayer, Bryan L Bcc:ryan.kelzenberg@co.anoka.mn.us; allison.strohl@co.washington.mn.us; kelly.miller@co.dakota.mn.us; eric.waage@co.hennepin.mn.us Subject:Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Available for Review Date:Thursday, December 12, 2024 10:00:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Good morning, Ramsey County is nearing completion toward updating its hazard mitigation plan. This plan identifies community capabilities, provides an assessment of risks to the county and its communities, and lays out community mitigation strategies that reduce risks posed by a variety of hazards. The plan must be updated and approved by FEMA every five years to keep it current and to maintain eligibility for mitigation grant assistance. The plan has been updated in accordance with FEMA’s updated hazard mitigation planning guidance and is anticipated to be submitted for FEMA approval by the end of the year. During the process, Ramsey County and its communities have reviewed capabilities, assessed levels of risk to specific hazards, and developed a comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy that builds on capabilities to buy down those risks. One of the key elements of the plan development process is inviting stakeholders to provide input during the planning process. You have been identified by Ramsey County as a key partner. The County invites you to provide any input or comment on the plan as they work through the final stages of development. We ask that you review the draft plan, which can be accessed here: Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan – Review Draft Please provide any feedback utilizing this link: Ramsey County Hazard Mitigation Plan – Feedback Survey The plan will be available for stakeholder review and comment until December 22. More information about hazard mitigation and mitigation planning can be found at https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/risk-management/hazard-mitigation-planning. Thank you, Kyle Kyle Karsjen Senior Preparedness Specialist Policy, Mitigation and Resilience Council Packet Page Number 242 of 375 G2, Attachment 2 M:515.460.4711 kyle.karsjen@tidalbasingroup.com tidalbasingroup.com Council Packet Page Number 243 of 375 G3 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Steven Love, Public Works Director Troy Brink, Street/Storm Superintendent PRESENTER:Steven Love, Public Works Director AGENDA ITEM: Road Salt Purchase 2025-2026 Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: Maplewood’s Public Works Department uses road salt in the fall, winter, and spring forwinter road maintenance operations. City Council will consider authorizing the purchase of de-icing salt under a State cooperative purchasing agreement for the 2025-2026 winter season. Recommended Action: Motion to authorize the Street Superintendent to purchase de-icing salt under a State contract for the 2025-2026 winter season in an estimated amount of $75,285.50. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $75,285.50 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: TheMaplewood Public Works Street Division operating budget includes funds for purchasing road salt for the 2025-2026 winter season. Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The use of de-icing salt is a vital part of the City’s snow and ice program and essential for vehicle safety on City streets. Background: An allocation is made in the Public Works operating budget each year for the purchase of de-icing salt for winter street maintenance. Each year the street maintenance division purchases de-icing salt under the State cooperative purchasing agreement. To be included in this program, the State requires the City to submit salt needs for the upcoming winter season in April 2025. Council Packet Page Number 244 of 375 G3 The State contract offers regular and treated road salt under an 80/120 purchasingrule. The 80/120 rule requires the City to purchase 80% of the placed order and the vendor guarantees to supply up to 120% at the locked price. Staff estimates regular road salt needs to be 400 tons (estimated at $103.62/ton, based on a 5% increase from last year), and treated road salt needs of 250 tons (estimated at $135.35/ton, based on a 5% increase from last year) for an estimated purchase cost of $75,285.50 for the 2025-2026 winter season. Attachments: None Council Packet Page Number 245 of 375 G4 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO:MichaelSable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Steven Love, Public Works Director Scott Schultz, Utility/Fleet Superintendent PRESENTER:Steven Love, Public Works Director AGENDA ITEM: Purchase of Equipment for Buildout of a Jet/Vac Truck (Unit 616) Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The City of Maplewood’s 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) identifies the replacement of one Combination Jet/Vac truck. City Council approval is needed to move forward with this purchase. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the purchase of equipment to buildout a combination Jet/Vac truck and direct the st Mayor and City Manager to enter into a contract with 1 Choice Vac Solutions under Sourcewell contract # 032824-CER in the amount of $484,230.18 Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $484,230.18 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: The 2025-2029 CIP identifies $600,000.00 for the replacement of one Jet/Vac truck. The total cost (Chassis and Buildout) for the new unit, less the estimated auction value of the old unit ($75,000.000), is $564,797.98. This is $35,202.02 less than the estimated CIP amount. The Finance Director has reviewed the fleet fund balance, and there are sufficient funds to move forward with this purchase. Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The Jet/Vac truck is a vital piece of equipment for the maintenance and cleaning of the City’s sanitary sewer and storm sewer system. This piece of equipment helps ensure that sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems work as intended and provide reliable services to the public. Council Packet Page Number 246 of 375 G4 Background: The 2011 Jet/Vac truck (Unit 616) is in need of replacement. This unit is used throughout several Public Works departments, including Fleet, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Streets, and Building Maintenance. It is used to clean and maintain sanitary sewers and lift stations, storm sewers, catch basins, and garage drainage sumps at City facilities. It is important to note this piece of equipment is vital in meeting the MS4 NPDES Permit requirements by removing sediments in the storm sewer sump structures. As part of the City’s asset management program, fleet assets use a Vehicle Replacement Rating (VRR) score to reflect the current condition of vehicles and to establish priority of replacement. The VRR score is based on a scale of 0 to 30, where 0 is a brand-new vehicle, and 30 is the highest priority for replacement. VRR scores are generated by rating a vehicle in six categories. These categories include the age of the vehicle, usage (distance driven or time used), maintenance and repair costs (not including accident repairs), reliability (frequency the vehicle is in the shop for repairs), type of service the vehicle receives, and the condition based on mechanic’s inspection. Due to the heavy wear and a VRR rating of 23, this equipment is recommended for replacement. The City Council previously approved the associated chassis purchase at the November 25, 2024, meeting. The chassis is scheduled to be built in July 2025. To ensure a completed buildout for the equipment by year-end 2025, the body/equipment must be ordered in April 2025. Staff has reviewed the buildout quote and available funding. St The cost for the Aquatech – B10-1450 equipment buildout by 1Choice Vac Solutions is $484,230.18. Attachments: st 1.Quote/Specs from 1 Choice Vac Solutions Council Packet Page Number 247 of 375 G4, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 248 of 375 G4, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 249 of 375 G4, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 250 of 375 G4, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 251 of 375 G4, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 252 of 375 G4, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 253 of 375 G4, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 254 of 375 G5 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Andrea Sindt, City Clerk Christine Evans, Deputy City Clerk PRESENTER:Andrea Sindt, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM: Local Lawful Gambling Permit for Ashland Productions, 2100 White Bear Avenue North Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: A request for a Local Lawful Gambling permit has been submitted by Ashland Productions, 2100 White Bear Avenue North. Approval of the request would allow lawful gambling activity to be conducted during the organizations Create the Magic: Our Songs, Our Stories fundraiser event, held April 26, 2025. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Local Lawful Gambling permit for Ashland Productions on April 26, 2025. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment Council approval is required prior to issuance of a local gambling permit, per City Code Sec. 22-12. Background: Lawful gambling activity conducted at this event is exempt from state licensure under MN §349.166. MN §349.213 authorizes cities to require a local permit for conduct of lawful gambling exempt from state licensing requirements. Attachments: None Council Packet Page Number 255 of 375 Council Packet Page Number 256 of 375 Council Packet Page Number 257 of 375 G6, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 258 of 375 G6, Attachment 1 G6, Attachment 1 G6, Attachment 1 G6, Attachment 1 G6, Attachment 1 G6, Attachment 1 G6, Attachment 1 G6, Attachment 1 G7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Brian Bierdeman, Public Safety Director PRESENTER:Brian Bierdeman, Public Safety Director AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Authorizing Joint Powers Agreement with the Met Councilfor Mutual Aid and Emergency Assistance with Law Enforcement Services Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: When multiple law enforcement agencies have jurisdiction within the same areas, a joint powers agreement between the agencies is a best practice to clearly provide expectations. This agreement between Maplewood Public Safety Department and the Metropolitan Council and the Metro Transit Police Department is for responsibilities in providing mutual aid and emergency assistance on transit property and routes. The agreement requires a resolution documenting City Council support to enter into the agreement. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the resolution supporting the Joint Powers Agreement of the Metropolitan Council for mutual aid and emergency assistance with law enforcement services. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A. Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment City Council approval is requested to sign the agreement. Background: The Met Council established the Metro Transit Police Department (MTPD) to police its transit properties and transit routes, carry out investigations and make arrests in these jurisdictions. MTPD is authorized to exercise general law enforcement authority as well as assist any law Council Packet Page Number 267 of 375 G7 enforcement agency in carrying out law enforcement activities, under agreement with that agency and subject to the availability of MTPD personnel and resources. Both the city and the Met Council enter into this agreement, with the understanding that the Maplewood Police Department and MTPD will maintain their own jurisdiction butmay provide mutual aid, assistance in arrests and investigations and emergency assistance as needed and when requested, in the conditions laid out in the attached agreement. The initial term of this agreement shall be for a three-year period, beginning upon signing of this agreement and ending February 16, 2028. Attachments: 1. Joint Powers Agreement of the Met Council 2. Resolution Council Packet Page Number 268 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AND THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR MUTUAL AID AND EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE WITH LAW ENFORCEMENTSERVICES Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes sections 471.59 and 473.407, this Joint Powers Agreement (“Agreement”) is made by and between the Metropolitan Council (“Council”), a public corporation and political subdivision under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of its Metropolitan Transit Police Department (“MTPD”), and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (“City”), a Minnesota municipal corporation. This Agreement also refers to the City of Maplewood Police Department (“MPD”). RECITALS 1.Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.407, the Council established the MTPD to police its transit property and transit routes, to carry out investigations, and to make arrests. The jurisdiction of MTPD is limited to offenses relating to Council transit property, equipment, employees, and passengersand includes traffic lanes designed for bus or transit use, freeway or expressway shoulders in the seven-county metropolitan area used by authorized transit buses and Metro Mobility buses, and high-occupancy vehicle lanes used by transit buses. 2.In addition, MTPD is authorized to exercise general law enforcement agency authority to assist any law enforcement agency in implementing or carrying out law enforcement activities, programs, or initiatives upon request from, or under an agreement with, any law enforcement agency and subject to the availability of MTPD’s personnel and other resources. 3.Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 412.221, subdivision 32, the City has created a police department to provide for the government and good order of the City, the suppression of vice and immorality, the prevention of crime, the protection of public and private property, the benefit of residence, trade, and commerce, and the promotion of health, safety, order, convenience, and the general welfare within the geographical boundaries of the City. MPD officers are also authorized transit representatives pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 609.855, subd. 7(g). 4.The parties acknowledge that the MPD has primary law enforcement jurisdiction within the City, and that both police departments have concurrent jurisdiction over transit property and transit routes within the City. 5.The City is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to City Resolution No. XX-XXX, approved on April 14, 2025. The Council is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Business Item No. 2024-238 approved on September 23, 2024. 6.The City and Council desire to enter into this Agreement to outline the responsibilities of each part related to both providing police servicesand emergency police services in the City as permitted in Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 12. 1 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 269 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed in this Agreement, the City and the Council agree as follows: AGREEMENT A. Law Enforcement Assistance 1. MTPD may engage in general law enforcement activities, including foot patrol, in the City related to MTPD’s jurisdiction. This includes arrest authority pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 629 and City Ordinances. 2. MTPD may exercise general law enforcement agency authority with permission of the MPD or when assisting the MPD in implementing or carrying out MPD law enforcement activities, programs, or initiatives. 3. If there is a crowd-control situation occurring on or near Metro Transit property within the City, MPD and MTPD shall have joint command of the response. 4. If there is a suspicious package or item situation occurring on or near Metro Transit property within the City, MTPD shall coordinate the appropriate response with the MPD. 5. If an incident occurs in the City that requires a specialized response unit, such as Special Weapons and Tactics (“SWAT”),MPD’s emergency response unit will be activated and take the lead. These types of incidents include, but are not limited to barricaded suspects, hostage incidents, active shooters, or any bomb or explosive device related call. B.Arrests and Investigations 1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.407, subd. 2, the initial processing of a person arrested by MTPDfor an offense within the agency's jurisdiction is the responsibility of MTPD unless otherwise directed by the MPD. 2. Persons arrested for violations which MTPD determine are not within its jurisdiction will be referred to the appropriate local law enforcement agency for further investigation or disposition. 3. Each law enforcement agency will process persons arrested under their own Originating Agency Identifier number. 4. MTPD will conduct all investigations relating to the damage or theft of Metro Transit property, including transit facilities, equipment, or any other property owned or used by Metro Transit. 5. Crimes committed on Metro Transit conveyances or in and about Metro Transit facilities, and other property shall be investigated by MTPD unless MTPD requests assistance. For those crimes, the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (“BCA”) crime scene technicians or other forensic personnel will be utilized when necessary to document or 2 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 270 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 investigate any incident requiring extensive forensic investigation unless MTPD requests MPD to assist. 6. All other crimes related to MTPD jurisdiction shall be investigated by mutual agreement. 7. At the request of the MPD, MTPD may assist in a subsequent investigation being carried out by the MPD. 8. The BCA shall be the primary investigating agency in Critical Incident cases involving only MTPD officers, unless MTPD requests the MPD to assume responsibility. MPD shall be the primary investigatory agency in all other Critical Incident cases, unless MPD refers the investigation to another jurisdiction. a. A Critical Incident is an incident involving any of the following situations occurring in the line of duty: i. The use of deadly force by or against an MTPD or MPD officer. ii. Death of or great bodily harm to an MTPD or MPD officer. iii. Death of or great bodily harm to a person who is in the custody or control of an MTPD or MPD officer. 9. Any action by an MTPD or MPD officer that causes or is intended to cause death. 10. After initiating an investigation, either law enforcement agency may turn over cases to the other agency for investigation that fall within that agency’s statutory jurisdiction by mutual agreement. 11. Evidence collected in investigations will be inventoried and retained by the investigating agency. In cases where an investigation is transferred to the other agency, all evidence will be turned over to that agency. Data from body-worn cameras will be retained by the law enforcement agency that issued the body-worn camera. 12. MPD requests for MTPD video data will be submitted to the Real Time Information Center Unit at michael.leubner@transitpd.org or such other address as MTPD may specify in writing. 13. Both agencies will rely on their own reporting system for the completion of reports. Officers will exchange case numbers to aid in follow-up to reported incidents. 14. MPD will provide MTPD with data on calls for service and reportable crime on Metro Transit conveyances on at least a yearly basis. 3 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 271 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 C. Communication 1. Transit related 911 calls received at the Council Transit Control Center (“TCC”) will be coordinated as follows: a. MTPD will be dispatched on emergency or in-progress calls. Immediately after this step, TCC may contact MPD dispatch for a MPD response. In most cases, these calls will be the responsibility of MTPD. n-emergency calls received by TCCwill be dispatched to MTPD. b. No Responding officers may request assistance from the MPD. 2. Transit related 911 calls received at MPD dispatch center will be coordinated as follows: a. MPD will immediately contact TCC for MTPD coordination and assist as requested. In most cases, these calls will be the responsibility of MTPD. b. Non-emergency calls received by MPD dispatch will be transferred to TCC. MTPD will respond to and handle these calls. 3. TCC is a secondary Public Safety Answering Point (“PSAP”). As a secondary PSAP, TCC does not directly receive 911 calls. In addition to TCC, the Council operates the Rail Control Center (“RCC”). All communications should be routed through TCCas it is the secondary PSAP. 4. Both agencies are members of the ARMER Radio System and have many coordination talk groups they can access. At any time, inter-agency communication can occur using the system. Theagencies’ respective dispatch centers will coordinate this connection as needed. 5. Both agencies will share information on events or activities that may require additional officers or resources (e.g., large transit events or special events that involve transit). D. Deconfliction 1. MPD will notify MTPD of any of any plain clothes or undercover operations on Metro Transit conveyances, or in or around Metro Transit bus stops, rail platforms, facilities, and other property prior to deployment. MTPD will notify MPD of any plain clothes or undercover operations on Metro Transit conveyances, or in or around Metro Transit bus stops, rail platforms, facilities, and other property in the City prior to deployment. 4 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 272 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 2. MTPD will advise MPDof the results of any proactive investigations, including, but not limited to, terrorism, vice, narcotics, gangs, and gun cases in which MTPD is the lead agency. In cases stemming from joint operations such as the Joint Terrorism Task Force, MTPD will follow the lead of theprimary law enforcement agency running the investigation or operation. E.Forfeiture 1. The City and the appropriate prosecuting authority will process any forfeiture resulting from seizures initiated by MTPD within the City. Any proceeds will be divided according to Minnesota Statutes. The law enforcementagencyshare will go to the City. F. Emergency Assistance 1. A party may request assistance (a “Requesting Party”) from the other party (a “Providing Party”) to respond to an emergency (“Emergency Assistance”). The Requesting Party shall make a request for Emergency Assistance to a Providing Party by contacting the Chief of Police or their designee. Requests may either be verbal or in writing. Any verbal request will be followed by a written request as soon as practical or within such period of time as provided by law. 2. Requests and responses to requests for Emergency Assistance under this Agreement are limited to law enforcement personnel assistance services, equipment, supplies, and related resources. 3. In response to a request for Emergency Assistance under this Agreement, a Providing Party may authorize and direct personnel to provide aid to a Requesting Party. The Providing Party shall provide personnel who possess the required qualifications along with the equipment and supplies of the Providing Party to a Requesting Party at the discretion of the Providing Party within the scope of aid deemed necessary by a Requesting Party or the Incident Commander. 4. Each party shall be responsible for damages to, or loss of, its own equipment used to respond to an emergency or provide Emergency Assistance under this Agreement. Each party waives the right to sue the other party for any damages to or loss of its equipment, even if the damages or losses were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of the other party or its officers, employees, or volunteers. 5. A party’s decision to provide Emergency Assistance is subject to the following conditions: a. Any party may withhold resources to the extent necessary to provide reasonable protection and services within its own jurisdiction. b. Any Providing Party may recall Emergency Assistance at any time in the best interests of that party. 5 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 273 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 c. Emergency response personnel of a Providing Party shall follow the policies and procedures of the Providing Party and will be under the Providing Party’s command and control but will follow the operational direction of the Incident Commander and be subject to the incident management system of the Requesting Party. d. Assets and equipment of a Providing Party shall remain under the control of the Providing Party but shall be under the operational control of the Incident Commander within the incident management system of the Requesting Party. 6. The Requesting Party and any Providing Party will each be responsible for its own costs and compensation for any Emergency Assistance that may occur during the term of the Agreement except as set forth below. a. Unless the Emergency Assistance is eligible for reimbursement, a Providing Party shall be responsible for the costs and compensation of its personnel, equipment, and supplies. A Providing Party shall make no demand to a Requesting Party for the reimbursement of the costs or expenses of the Providing Party for Assistance rendered pursuant to this Agreement. For an emergency that is eligible for reimbursement of costs, the labor force expenses of a Providing Party will be treated as contract labor, with costs of all wages, including overtime and fringe benefits, eligible for reimbursement. b. Notwithstanding the above paragraphs in this Section, a Requesting Party may reimburse a Providing Party that has provided Emergency Assistance pursuant to this Agreement. A Requesting Party that is willing to reimburse a Providing Party for Emergency Assistance rendered under the terms of this Agreement, may do so after receipt of an itemized bill from the Providing Party for the actual cost of any Emergency Assistance provided. The charges for Emergency Assistance provided pursuant to this Agreement will be based upon the actual costs incurred by the Providing Party, including salaries or wages, overtime, materials, supplies, and other necessary expenses, except that the parties agree that the Federal Emergency Management Agency equipment rates will be used as the basis for equipment charges whenever possible. c. If a local, State, or Federal emergency is declared, a Requesting Party may reimburse a Providing Party for Emergency Assistance rendered under the terms of this Agreement. Any Providing Party will submit to a Requesting Party an itemized bill for the actual cost of any Assistance provided as described above. A Requesting Party is responsible to take all steps it deems necessary to seek reimbursement from the United States of America, the State of Minnesota, or other sources, to the extent that such reimbursement is available, for expenses it incurs for services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Should funding become available, a Requesting Party may reimburse a Providing Party to the extent possible under the terms of this Agreement. Any claims for reimbursement by a Providing Party must be made to a Requesting Party within 90 days after the expense is sustained or incurred. 6 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 274 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 d. In the case of an emergency for which a Requesting Party will seek reimbursement of costs from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) or the State of Minnesota, a Requesting Party shall make the request for Emergency Assistance to the Providing Party and the Incident Commander shall monitor and oversee the documentation of the performance of emergency work and the documentation of reasonable and reimbursable costs of a Providing Party in accordance with the FEMA Disaster Assistance Policy and will disburse the Federal share of funds owed to a Providing Party. G. Term of Agreement and Termination 1. This Agreement remains in force and effect from the Effective Date until February 16, 2028. 2. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, each party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to the other party. H. Liability 1. When providing Emergency Assistance: a. For purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Liability Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466), the employees and officers of a Providing Party are deemed to be employees (as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 466.01, subdivision 6 of a Requesting Party. b. A Requesting Party agrees to defend and indemnify a Providing Party against any claims brought or actions filed against a Providing Party or any officer, employee, or volunteer of a Providing Party for injury to, death of, or damage to the property of any third person or persons, arising from the performance and provision of Emergency Assistance in responding to a request for Emergency Assistance by the Requesting Party pursuant to this Agreement. c. The intent of this subdivision is to impose on each Requesting Party a limited duty to defend and indemnify a Providing Party for claims arising within a Requesting Party’s jurisdictionsubject to the limits of liability under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. The purpose of creating this duty to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. d. No party to this Agreement nor any officer of any party shall be liable to any other party or to any other person for failure of any party to furnish Emergency Assistance to the other party, or for recalling Emergency Assistance. e. A Providing Party shall not be responsible for any injuries, damages, or losses arising from the acts or omissions of personnel of a Requesting Party and its officers, employees, agents, and assigns. 7 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 275 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 2. In all other circumstances, each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and omissions and the results thereof, to the extent authorized by the law, and shall not be responsible for the acts and omissions of the other party and the results thereof. 3. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a limitation or waiver of any immunities, defenses, or other limitations on liability to which the parties are entitled by law. The provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466, and other applicable laws govern liability of the parties. In the event of any claims or actions filed against any party, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to allow a claimant to obtain separate judgments or separate liability caps from the individual parties. For purposes of determining total liability for damages, the parties are considered a single governmental unit pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 471.59, subd. 1a. I. General Terms 1. Compensation for Assistance. Each party will be responsible for its own costs and compensation for any assistance that may be provided under the terms of this Agreement except as otherwise stated under the Emergency Assistance section. 2. Amendments. No amendments may be made to this Agreement except in writing and approved by the City Council and the Metropolitan Council. 3. Workers’ Compensation. Each party shall be responsible for injuries or death to its own personnel. Each party will maintain workers’ compensation insurance or self- insurance coverage, covering its own personnel while they are providing services pursuant to this Agreement. Each party, and where applicable its insurer, waives the right to sue any other party for workers’ compensation benefits paid to its own employee or volunteer or their dependents, even if the injuries or death were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other party or its officers, employees, or volunteers. 4. Compliance with Laws. The parties shall exercise due professional care to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations. 5. Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Ramsey County, Minnesota, and the parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or otherwise. 6. Data Practices Act and CJIS Compliance. The parties agree to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act, 28 C.F.R. Part 20, and the FBI CJIS Security Policy with respect to the collection, maintenance, storage, dissemination, use, and protection of law enforcement data and criminal history/criminal justice information. The parties agree not to release data except as authorized by law. These obligations survive the termination of this Agreement. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 13.72, subd. 20, all data on Metro Transit customers collected by the Council through its personalized web services or the regional fare collection system is “private data” on transit customers. This 8 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 276 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 classification does not prevent the exchange of information between the MTPD and the MPD allowed under Minnesota Statutes section 13.82, subd. 24. 7. Notice. Any notice in connection with this Agreement will be in writing and delivered by (a) personal delivery, (b) an overnight express courier, (c) confirmed e-mail, or (d) certified or registered mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested. Notices will be deemed to be effective upon personal delivery, 1 day after deposit with an overnight express courier, 5 days after deposit in the mail, or upon confirmation of receipt of e-mail. Notices will be sent to a party at its address set forth below or such other address as that party may specify in writing pursuant to this section: MPD:MTPD: Chief of Police or his/her designee Chief of Police or his/her designee th 1830 County Road B E 560 6 Avenue North Maplewood, MN 55109 Minneapolis, MN 55411 Brian.Bierdeman@MaplewoodMN.gov joseph.dotseth@transitpd.org 8. Waiver. No waiver of any provision or of any breach of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions or further breach, and no such waiver shall be effective unless made in writing and signed by an authorized representative of the party to be charged with such a waiver. 9. Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only and shall in no way define, limit,or affect the scope and intent of this Agreement. 10. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be illegal or otherwise unenforceable, such provision shall be severed, and the balance of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 11. Counterparts and Electronic Communication. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be transmitted by electronic mail in portable document format (“pdf”) and signatures appearing on electronic mail instruments shall be treated as original signatures. 12. Effective Date.The Agreement will become effective on the date the last party signs it. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the City and the Council have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below. \[Remainder of the Page Blank\] 9 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 277 of 375 G7, Attachment 1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA DATED:___________________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Mayor Marylee Abrams DATED:___________________________ BY:________________________________ Its: City Manager Michael Sable METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DATED:___________________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Regional Administrator Ryan O’Connor DATED:___________________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Interim Chief of Police Joseph Dotseth 10 DOCSOPEN\\MA745\\5\\975014.v5-2/21/25 Council Packet Page Number 278 of 375 G7, Attachment 2 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AND THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR MUTUAL AID AND EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council and the Metro Transit Police Department acknowledge that the Maplewood Public Safety Department has primary law enforcement jurisdiction within the City; and WHEREAS, both law enforcement agencies have concurrent jurisdiction over transit property and transit routes within the City; and WHEREAS, the Metro Transit Police Department is authorized to assist the Maplewood Police Department with law enforcement activities; and WHEREAS, both law enforcement agencies enter into this agreement to outline the responsibilities of each agency in providing mutual aid and emergency assistance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, that: 1.The joint powers agreement for mutual aid and emergency assistance with law enforcement services between the city and Metropolitan Council is accepted and acknowledged; and 2.The mayor and city manager are directed to enter into the agreement; and 3.The agreement remains in effect until February 16, 2028. Approved by the Maplewood City Council this 14th day of April, 2024. Council Packet Page Number 279 of 375 G8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP,Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Conditional Use Permit Review, Woodland Hills Church, 1740 Van Dyke Street North Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The conditional use permit (CUP) for Woodland Hills Church at 1740 Van Dyke Street North is due for review. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the CUP review for Woodland Hills Church at 1740 Van Dyke Street North and review again in one year. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment City ordinance requires conditional use permits to be reviewed by the council within one year of initial approval unless such review is waived by council decision. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite or specific term for subsequent reviews, not to exceed five years. Background: On February 12, 2024, the city approved Woodland Hills Church’s plans to remove a portion of the parking lot north of its church building at 1740 Van Dyke Street North to create green space, plant additional trees, and provide outdoor space for visitors. Construction and overall site work are largely complete with landscaping scheduled for later this spring. Staff has no concerns regarding the progress of this project. Staff recommends reviewing the CUP in one year. Council Packet Page Number 280 of 375 G8 Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 13.69 acres Surrounding Land Uses North: Ripley Avenue, vacant restaurant and Goodrich Golf Course East: Single dwellings South: Theater building (owned by church), single dwellings and Larpenteur Avenue West: Van Dyke Street and commercial businesses Planning Existing Land Use: Mixed Use Existing Zoning: Mixed Use Attachments: 1.Overview Map 2.Site and Landscaping Plans 3.City Council Meeting Minutes Council Packet Page Number 281 of 375 , Attachment 1 Location Map - 1740 Van Dyke Street North December 21, 2023 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Project Area Project Site 0460 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Council Packet Page Number 282 of 375 , Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 283 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 284 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 285 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 286 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 287 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 288 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 289 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 290 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 291 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 292 of 375 G9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP,Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Conditional Use Permit Review, Mister Car Wash, 3050 White Bear Avenue North Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The conditional use permit (CUP) for Mister Car Wash at 3050 White Bear Avenue North is due for review. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the CUP review for Mister Car Wash at 3050 White Bear Avenue North and review again in one year. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment City ordinance requires conditional use permits to be reviewed by the council within one year of initial approval unless such review is waived by council decision. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite or specific term for subsequent reviews, not to exceed five years. Background: On February 26, 2024, the city approved Mister Car Wash’s plans to construct a 4,800-square-foot car wash building at 3050 White Bear Avenue North. Construction and overall site work are largely complete, and the site is operational. Most of the site’s landscaping has been installed. Staff has no concerns regarding the progress of this project. Staff recommends reviewing the CUP in one year to ensure the landscaping continues to meet the city’s requirements. Council Packet Page Number 293 of 375 G9 Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 0.95 Acres Surrounding Land Uses North: Commercial East: Commercial South: Commercial West: Commercial Planning Existing Land Use: Commercial Existing Zoning: Business Commercial Attachments: 1.Overview Map 2.Site and Building Elevation Plans 3.City Council Meeting Minutes Council Packet Page Number 294 of 375 G, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 295 of 375 G Attachment 2 MNMAPLEWOOD BYDATEREVISIONSNo. WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM WASH PHONE: 651-645-4197 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 MISTER CAR SITE PLAN © 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED FOR MAPLEWOOD C400 SHEET NUMBER MN 1619 R 0.99 AC 0.99 AC FRONT: 15' ±4,800 SF COMMERCIALCOMMERCIAL12 SPACES SIDE/REAR: 10' BC - BUSINESSBC - BUSINESS 7 SPACES (1 LANE) 1 STALLS / 1 STALLS (9 VACUUM, 3 EMPLOYEE) AREAS PARKING PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK ZONING SUMMARY PROPERTY SUMMARY BUILDING DATA SUMMARY ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.AT 18" O.C. IN BOTH DIRECTIONSVERTICAL CURB (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBTRENCH DRAIN WITH EXIT SIGN PER MISTER CAR WASHVACUUM EQUIPMENT: REF. ARCHITECTURAL PLANSWAYFINDING SIGNAGE (TYP.) POS CANOPY AND EQUIPMENT: REF. ARCHITECTURAL PLANSMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE PAVEMENT PER MISTER CARWASH STANDARDS ANDSPECIFICATIONS. REINFORCEMENT TO INCLUDE #3 REBAR SPACEDLANDSCAPE AREAFLUSH CURBROLLED CURBSTANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONSDIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROW. PER GREENBOOK STANDARDS MAPLEWOOD, MN MISTER CAR WASH NORTH I JL ABCDEFGHKNOP M ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED PROPOSED PROPERTYBUILDING AREAREQUIRED PARKINGPROPOSED PARKING TOTAL PROPERTY AREA EXISTING ZONINGPROPOSED ZONINGPARKING SETBACKSBUILDING SETBACKSFRONT:30'KEYNOTE LEGEND LEGEND ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES,ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITHVERIFY SIGN DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND REQUIRED PERMITS WITH THE OWNER. OF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDINGDIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSEDLIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.EASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY &PARCEL INFORMATION.NOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREASRELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSEDGOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORKSPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO 4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE PLAN NOTES 1.REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS2.REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING3.DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE5.TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 20-FEET IN6.MONUMENT SIGN(S) ARE DETAILED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ARE P O B O B ' 0. 81 TRASH ENCLOSURE. COMBINED VACUUM ANDREFERENCE PLANS BYOTHERS FOR DETAILS B ' 5 J . P 9 B J P P PENIL YTREPORP P H KCABTES GNIKRAP '5 H K RECLAIM TANKS, REFERENCEPLANS BY OTHERS P C A B T H E I S L ' JJ 3 L G . G N 2 I 2 K K I G C R A A 24.0' B P J T E F EMPLOYEE STALLS (3) S F L G N2 PROPOSED, 1 EXISTING D L 13.0' B13.0'8.5' ' 3 . 0 8 TRANSFORMER PAD J IKJ 18.0'18.0' IE H P L O C 5.8' D 24.0' K C 5.0' A B E TH GATE ARM. H N E I S L 110.5' OJ YG T N I R K E C C R '0. P 21 A O OOTHERS FOR DETAILS. POREFERENCE PLANS BY R ' 45.3' P5 M J L I KJ K 18.0'16.5' ±4,800 SF CAR WASH 110' TUNNEL P P '0 .81 HC C O '2 .84 H 27.7' 7.8' Woodlynn Ave. L K K I C ' C H 0 JJA A . B 4 B H T 2 T EE E SN SI L G G A NY G IN IT GD K 34.5'R L L I R E U AP BP O ' ' R 05 I 3 1P J HL K CA BT E S G NID LI U B ' 03 OATTENDANT HUT J P KC A BT E S GN IK R AP P'5 1 H E NI L YT PRE P O RP P BB GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER . e v A r a e B e t i h MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, REFERENCE W .cnI ,setaicossA dna nroH-yelmiK ot ytilibail tuohtiw eb llahs .cnI ,setaicossA dna nroH-yelmiK yb noitatpada dna noitazirohtua nettirw tuohtiw tnemucod siht no ecnailer reporpmi dna fo esueR .deraperp saw ti hcihw rof tneilc dna esoprup cificeps eht rof ylno dednetni si ,ecivres fo tnemurtsni na sa ,niereh detneserp sngised dna stpecnoc eht htiw rehtegot ,tnemucod sihT K:\\TWC_LDEV\\mister car wash\\maplewood, mn\\3 Design\\CAD\\plansheets\\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg December 07, 2023 - 2:32pm Council Packet Page Number 296 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 297 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 298 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 299 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 300 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 301 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 302 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 303 of 375 Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 304 of 375 G10 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Conditional Use Permit Review, Londin Crossing, 2501 Londin Lane East Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The conditional use permit (CUP) for Londin Crossing at 2501 Londin Lane East is due for review. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the CUP review for Londin Crossing, located at 2501 Londin Lane East, and review only if a problem arises or a significant change is proposed. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment City ordinance requires conditional use permits to be reviewed by the council within one year of initial approval unless such review is waived by council decision. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite or specific term for subsequent reviews, not to exceed five years. Background: Since the city council approved a CUP on October 25, 2021, for a 148-unit multi-family building, site construction has been completed. The building division finalized the permits, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, and the property has an active rental license with the city. Staff recommends reviewing this CUP again only if a problem arises or a significant change is proposed. Council Packet Page Number 305 of 375 G10 Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 5.92 Acres Surrounding Land Uses North: Ramsey County Correctional Facility South: City Owned-Park Land/Residential East: Lower Afton Road/Residential West: Residential/Vacant Land Planning Existing Land Use: High-Density Residential Existing Zoning: Multiple Dwelling Residential Attachments: 1.Overview Map 2.City Council Minutes Council Packet Page Number 306 of 375 G, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 307 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 308 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 309 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 310 of 375 G11 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Conditional Use Permit Review, McCarrons Water Treatment Plant, 1900 Rice Street North Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The conditional use permit (CUP) for McCarrons Water Treatment Plant at 1900 Rice Street North is due for review. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the CUP review for McCarrons Water Treatment Plant, located at 1900 Rice Street North, and review again in one year. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment City ordinance requires conditional use permits to be reviewed by the council within one year of initial approval unless such review is waived by council decision. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite or specific term for subsequent reviews, not to exceed five years. Background: Since this CUP was reviewed last year, Saint Paul Regional Water Services has continued the multi-year construction improvements to its McCarrons Water Treatment Plant. The project includes demolition, tree removal, and construction related to expanding the facility both above and underground. The city has issued grading, tree removal, demolition, and building permits for various phases of the active project. Site work is in progress and will continue into the middle of 2026. Council Packet Page Number 311 of 375 G11 There are no concerns about the project's progress, and staff recommend reviewing the CUP again in one year. Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 127 Acres Surrounding Land Uses North: Single Dwelling Residential/Educational Facilities/Commercial South: Single Dwelling Residential/Larpenteur Avenue East: Single Dwelling Residential West: Commercial Planning Existing Land Use: Institutional Existing Zoning: Farm Residential Attachments: 1.Overview Map 2.City Council Minutes Council Packet Page Number 312 of 375 G, Attachment Council Packet Page Number 313 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 314 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 315 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 316 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 317 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 318 of 375 Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 319 of 375 G12 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Conditional Use Permit Review, Xcel Energy, 1555 Century Avenue North Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The conditional use permit (CUP) for Xcel Energy at 1555 Century Avenue North is due for review. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the CUP review for Xcel Energy, located at 1555 Century Avenue North, and review again in one year. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment City ordinance requires conditional use permits to be reviewed by the council within one year of initial approval unless such review is waived by council decision. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite or specific term for subsequent reviews, not to exceed five years. Background: On September 26, 2022, the city council approved a conditional use permit for public and private utilities. The facility has been located at the site since the 1950s and predated the requirement for a CUP. The construction improvement to the gas plant triggered the requirement for the site to obtain a CUP for a public and private utility location. Project work started last year and will continue throughout 2025. There are no concerns about the project's progress, and staff recommends reviewing the CUP again in one year. Council Packet Page Number 320 of 375 G12 Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 19.73 Acres Surrounding Land Uses North: Open Space South: Union Pacific Railroad/Residential East: Vacant/Commercial Properties in the City of Oakdale West: Open Space Planning Existing Land Use: Utility Existing Zoning: Light Manufacturing Attachments: 1.Overview Map 2.City Council Minutes Council Packet Page Number 321 of 375 G, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 322 of 375 ttachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 323 of 375 ttachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 324 of 375 ttachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 325 of 375 ttachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 326 of 375 ttachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 327 of 375 ttachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 328 of 375 G13 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Elizabeth Hammond, Planner PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Conditional Use Permit Review, InTech, Inc., 1055 Gervais Avenue East Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The conditional use permit (CUP) for InTech, Inc., at 1055 Gervais Avenue East, is due for review. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the CUP review for InTech Inc., located at 1055 Gervais Avenue East, and review again only if a problem arises or a significant change is proposed. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment City ordinance requires the council to review conditional use permits within one year of initial approval unless such review is waived by council decision. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite or specific term for subsequent reviews, not to exceed five years. Background: In 2023, the city council reviewed and approved a proposal by the owner, InTech, Inc., to amend the property’s conditional use permit, allowing for a building addition to be constructed within the required front yard setback. Since the CUP was last reviewed in 2024, the trash dumpster has been placed behind the existing fenced area, meeting the screening requirement. The site is in good standing with the city, and staff recommends that the council approve the CUP and review it again only if a problem arises or a significant change is proposed. Council Packet Page Number 329 of 375 G13 Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 1.00 Acres Surrounding Land Uses North: Single Dwelling Residential South: Light Manufacturing East: Light Manufacturing West: Light Manufacturing Planning Existing Land Use: Commercial Existing Zoning: Light Manufacturing Attachments: 1.Overview Map 2.City Council Minutes Council Packet Page Number 330 of 375 G13, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 331 of 375 G13, Attachment 2 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, March 13, 2023 City Hall, Council Chambers Meeting No. 05-23 J.NEW BUSINESS 1.Conditional Use Permit Amendment Resolution, InTech, Inc., 1055 Gervais Avenue East Community Development Director Parr gave the presentation. Patrick Kasper, owner of InTech, Inc., addressed council and provided additional information. Councilmember Cave moved to approve a conditional use permit amendment resolution for a building addition at 1055 Gervais Avenue East, subject to certain conditions of approval. Resolution 23-03-2186 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Patrick Kasper, on behalf of Intech, Inc., has requested to amend the Conditional Use Permit for the property to allow for a building addition. 1.02 The property is located at: The South 290.4 feet of the East 150 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The East half of the East half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, less the North 24 rods thereof is subject to a cartway over and across the South 16 feet, more or less thereof; and that the North 56 rods of the West half of the East half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, is subject to a cartway over and across the South 16 feet more or less thereof. PID: 092922240038 1.03 City Ordinance Sec. 44-12 allows for the expansion of a nonconforming structure within the required setback through a conditional use permit approved by the city council. Section 2. Standards. 2.01 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. City Ordinance Section 44- 1097(a) states that the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine standards for approval. Council Packet Page Number 332 of 375 G13, Attachment 2 1.The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2.The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3.The use would not depreciate property values. 4.The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5.The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. 6.The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7.The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8.The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and scenic features into the development design. 9.The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The proposal meets the specific Conditional Use Permit standards. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this conditional use permit request. 1.On February 21, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. City staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this resolution. 2.On March 13, 2023, the City Council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and City staff. Section 5. City Council Council Packet Page Number 333 of 375 G13, Attachment 2 5.01 The City Council hereby approves the resolution. The conditional use permit resolution approves a building addition within the required front yard setback. Approval is based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.The proposed project must achieve all city code requirements. 2.The proposed project requires a 15-day minor construction project application. This application is required to be reviewed prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3.The applicant is required to obtain a building permit before construction. 4.The approved exterior storage is limited to equipment, trailers, and vehicles associated with the business. All vehicles and trailers must be licensed and operable and stored on an approved parking surface. 5.The owner or applicant installing and maintaining a screening fence that is 100 percent opaque around the perimeter of the outdoor storage area. The owner shall maintain and repair the fence so that it remains in good condition and 100 percent opaque. 6.There shall be no noise-making business activity conducted on the property, or made by vehicles entering or leaving the lot, between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m., Monday through Saturday, and not on Sunday as required by city code. This condition shall not prohibit business activity on the property during these hours so long as the business activity does not otherwise violate the provisions of the city ordinance regulating noise. 7.The proposed construction and the outdoor storage on the property must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 8.The city council shall review this permit in one year. 9.The property shall meet the hard surface parking and minimum space requirements as required by ordinance. 10.All construction shall follow the project plans as approved by the city. This shall include providing a driveway to the gate of the storage yard, subject to the requirements of the fire marshal. 11.The property owner shall keep the site clean of debris and shall cut or remove any noxious weeds. 12.The owners and operators shall only use Maplewood Drive and Gervais Avenue for access to the site. There shall be no truck traffic from this business on Cypress Street or on Keller Parkway. Council Packet Page Number 334 of 375 G13, Attachment 2 13.The owner shall not make any changes or modifications to the north 44 feet of the property which will have a negative impact on the managed B wetland to the north of the property. Any changes or modifications proposed by the owner shall be submitted to the city for approval prior to implementation Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All The motion passed. Council Packet Page Number 335 of 375 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Council Packet Page Number 336 of 375 J1 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Steven Love, Public Works Director PRESENTER:Steven Love, Public Works Director AGENDA ITEM: 2025 City Hall Partial Roof Replacement Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: A section of City Hall’s metal roof has had a number of leaks over the last several years. Attempts to address these leaks have been made but have proven to be temporary fixes. The City Council will consider authorizing Redline Architectural Sheet Metal (Redline) to replace the leaking section of City Hall’s metal roof. Recommended Action: Motion to authorize Redline Architectural Sheet Metal to replace a section of the City Hall metal roof. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $110,475. Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: The total estimated cost forthis project is $110,475. These improvements will be funded through the Building Improvement Fund. The 2024- 2028 Capital Improvement Plan identified $160,000 for replacing the Park Maintenance building’s roof. Due to the condition of the City Hall roof, the Park Maintenance roof replacement project was put on hold, and it is recommended that the funds from that project be used to address the condition of the City Hall roof. Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated CommunicationOperational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment Replacement of the City Hall roof section with the leaking issue will help protect the City’s infrastructure and reduce the impact on staff who work in these areas. Council Packet Page Number 337 of 375 J1 Background: The west section of the City Hall metal roof (see project map) has experienced leaking issues over the last several years. While attempts to repair these issues have been made, they have proven to be temporary fixes. It is recommended that this section of the City Hall roof be replaced. The proposed project includes removing and replacing the west section of the City Hall roof, replacing any damaged plywood, installing a new ice and water shield, and installing new insulation to bring this section up to current insulation standards. Two companies provided quotes for the roof replacement project. Redline’s total quote was the lowest at $110,475 and comes with a five-year warranty on all work. Redline estimates they can start the project around the middle/end of May. Redline is responsible for obtaining all necessary building permits for this project. Attachments: 1. Project Map 2. Redline Architectural Sheet Metal Quotes Council Packet Page Number 338 of 375 J1, Attachment 1 QspkfduNbq DjuzIbmmSppgQspkfdu XftuTfdujpopgSppg upcfSfqmbdfe Council Packet Page Number 339 of 375 J1, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 340 of 375 J1, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 341 of 375 J1, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 342 of 375 J1, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 343 of 375 J2 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO:MichaelSable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Steven Love, Public Works Director Jon Jarosch, Assistant City Engineer PRESENTER:Steven Love, Public Works Director AGENDA ITEM: 2025 MaplewoodStreet Improvements, City Project 24-12 a.Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Advertising for Bids b.Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The City Council ordered the improvements for the 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12 on February 24, 2025, following a public hearing. The next steps in the public improvement process are to approve the plans and specifications, authorize the advertisement for bids and order the preparation of the assessment roll. Final plans and specifications are complete and ready to be advertised for bids. The City Council will consider approving the plans and specifications and advertising for bids. The bid opening is tentatively scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on May 9, 2025. The City Council will also consider ordering the preparation of the assessment roll for the proposed project. Recommended Action: a.Motion to approve the attached resolution approving plans and specifications, and advertising bids for the 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12. b.Motion to approve the attached resolution ordering the preparation of the assessment roll for the 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $9,588,300 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: The adopted budget includes a combination of Special Benefit Assessments, the Street Revitalization Fund, the Environmental Utility Fund, the Sanitary Sewer Fund, St. Paul Regional Water Services, G.O. Improvement Bonds, and the W.A.C. Fund. Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated CommunicationOperational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment Council Packet Page Number 344 of 375 J2 The streets proposed for reconstruction are an important part of the City’s infrastructure, connecting to and from residential properties, businesses, and other points of interest. The City streets and utilities included in the project have deteriorated beyond the point of regular annual maintenance and need to be replaced. The project design will minimize the impact on the urban environment while improving the quality of stormwater runoff reaching area waterbodies. Background: The project streets have a combined average pavement condition index (PCI) rating of 42/100. The PCI rating is based on a visual survey of the pavement. It is a number between 0 and 100, with 0 being the worst possible pavement condition and 100 being the best possible pavement condition (i.e. a new road). The Maplewood Engineering Department prepares plans and specifications before advertising the project for bids. The plans and specifications are essential to ensuring the project is constructed to current standards, meets the needs of area residents, receives reasonable bids, and is completed in a timely manner. The total length of streets included with this project is 4.4 miles, including the South Leg and Prosperity-Hazelwood areas. This project is a part of the 2025 – 2029 Maplewood Capital Improvement Plan. Construction on the proposed project is anticipated to begin in June 2025. The project streets' existing street pavement and aging utility infrastructure require ongoing maintenance for the Street and Utility Departments. Of the infrastructure elements the City maintains, the bulk of the maintenance activities consist of patching the roadway, crack sealing, filling potholes, and maintaining the aging utility infrastructure. The poor condition of the existing street pavement represents a decreased level of service for the residents of Maplewood. Staff has received complaints over the years from area residents about the street conditions. The proposed improvements are described below: Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements (South Leg Area): Full depth reclamation (grinding/mixing) of existing pavement and underlying aggregate. Removal of excess reclaim material. Installation of new pavement. Replacement of soft soils under the roadway as needed. Spot replacement of structurally damaged concrete curb and gutter. Improvements to existing pedestrian features and ADA upgrades. Saw and seal control joints for the new pavement. Replacement of failing utility structures and outdated utility covers. Installation of sacrificial anodes on water mains, as determined by St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS). The anode reduces the corrosion (rusting) of the water main and increases its service life. Restoration of disturbed driveways, boulevards, and landscaping impacted by the project. Full Reconstruction Improvements (Prosperity-Hazelwood Area): Full removal of existing pavement and underlying aggregate. Full replacement of street pavement. Replacement of soft soils under the roadway as needed. Construction of new concrete curb and gutter. Council Packet Page Number 345 of 375 J2 Improvements to existing pedestrian features and ADA upgrades. Construction of an 8-foot wide trail along the west side of Prosperity Road. Saw and seal control joints for the new pavement. Installation on sacrificial anodes on water mains as determined by SPRWS. Expansion of the storm sewer system. Replacement of water main on Hazelwood Street. Spot replacement of select sanitary sewer mains and services. Water quality improvements such as rain gardens and underground infiltration basins. Restoration of driveways, turf, and landscape features impacted by the project. Sewer lining of deteriorated sanitary sewer mains in select areas throughout the City. Fog seal of past neighborhood improvement project streets. Assessments An independent appraisal firm has been hired to provide an opinion of special benefit received by properties within the project area. This information will ultimately be used to determine the assessment amounts for the project area. The preliminary rates established in the City’s Special Assessment Policy were used to generate a preliminary assessment roll for budgeting purposes. Based on the City of Maplewood’s Pavement Management Policy, parcels are assessed on an equal “unit” basis. However, per Minnesota State Statute 429, the assessment amount cannot be greater than the benefit received by the property from improvements. Ultimately, the special benefit appraisal report will determine the final assessment amounts for the properties proposed to be assessed as a part of the project. For the purposes of this report and establishing a project financing plan, the preliminary assessment rate(s) are as follows. Residential o Full Reconstruction Rate, Single Family Unit = $6,600/Unit o Pavement Rehabilitation Rate, Single Family Unit = $3,450/Unit Commercial/Multi-Family o Full Reconstruction Rate = $132.00/Front-Foot The assessment hearing is currently proposed for September of 2025. Estimated Project Cost The total estimated project cost is outlined below: Estimated Project Cost Summary Proposed ImprovementsTotal Amount % of Total Street Improvements$5,603,900 59% Drainage Improvements $2,496,700 26% Sanitary Sewer Improvements $583,400 4% Water System Improvements $904,300 11% Total Estimated Project Cost: $9,588,300 100% The estimated costs include 10% contingencies and 12% overhead, which include geotechnical, legal and fiscal expenses. Council Packet Page Number 346 of 375 J2 Project Funding Plan The improvements are proposed to be financed through a combination ofEnvironmental Utility Fund, General Obligation (GO) Bonds, Sanitary Sewer Fund, Special Benefit Assessment, St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS), Street Revitalization Fund and Water Area Fund. An update to the financing plan will be provided after the special benefits appraisal is received. Project Funding Plan Funding Source Total Amount % of Total General Obligation (G.O.) Improvement Bonds $2,419,941 25% Street Revitalization Fund $2,451,639 26% Environmental Utility Fund $1,863,000 20% Sanitary Sewer Fund $583,400 6% Water Area Fund (WAC) $133,300 1% St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) $771,000 8% Special Benefit Assessment $1,366,020 14% Total Estimated Project Funding: $9,588,300 100% The total estimated project cost is roughly $548,000 higher than the approved CIP. This is due to higher than anticipated drainage improvement costs at the feasibility level versus the CIP. These additional costs will be covered by larger contributions from the Street Revitalization Fund and the Environmental Utility Fund. Overall bonding levels are estimated to be roughly $113,000 less than the CIP estimate. The estimated project costs and the project funding plan have been reviewed by the Finance Director. Project Schedule The following is a tentative schedule for City Project 24-12. Project Schedule Date Order Preparation of Feasibility Study 8/12/2024 Neighborhood Meeting #1 (South Leg Area only) 12/18/2024 Neighborhood Meeting #1 (Prosperity-Hazelwood Area only) 12/19/2024 City Council Meeting | Accept Feasibility Study, Order Public Hearing, 1/27/2025 Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications Neighborhood Meeting #2 (South Leg and Prosperity-Hazelwood Area)2/19/2025 City Council Meeting | Public Hearing andOrder Improvement2/24/2025 City Council Meeting | Approve Plans and Specifications, Authorize 4/14/2025 Advertisement for Bids, Authorize Preparation of Assessment Roll Bid Opening5/9/2025 City Council Meeting | Award Contract 5/27/2025 Neighborhood Meeting #3 (Construction Information) June 2025 Begin Construction June 2025 City Council Meeting | Accept Assessment Roll and Order Assessment August 2025 Hearings Neighborhood Meeting #4 (Assessment Information) August 2025 City Council Meeting | Assessment Hearing and Adopt Assessment Roll September 2025 Complete Construction November 2025 Assessments Certified to Ramsey County November 2025 Council Packet Page Number 347 of 375 J2 Attachments: 1.Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Advertising for Bids 2.Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Assessment Roll 3.Project Location Map Council Packet Page Number 348 of 375 J2, Attachment 1 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ADVERTISING FOR BIDS CITY PROJECT 24-12 WHEREAS, following a resolution passed by the City Council on January 27, 2025, plans and specifications for the 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12, have been prepared under the direction of the City Engineer and presented to the City Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota: 1.Such plans and specifications are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2. The City Clerk or office of the City Engineer shall prepare and publish an tisement for bids in the official paper and Finance and Commerce based on the approved adver plans and specifications for the improvement. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least twenty-one days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened electronically via QuestCDN and considered at th 10:00 a.m. on the 9 day of May, 2025. Bids shall be accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3.The City Clerk and City Engineer are authorized and instructed to receive and open bids received at the time and place noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The City Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular City Council meeting of th May 27, 2025. th Approved this 14 day of April 2025. Council Packet Page Number 349 of 375 J2, Attachment 2 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer will receive bids for the 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota: 1.The City Clerk and City Engineer shall calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City office for inspection. 2.The City Clerk shall notify the City Council upon completion of such proposed assessment. th Approved this 14 day of April 2025. Council Packet Page Number 350 of 375 J2, Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 351 of 375 J3 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution, 1300 McKnight Road North AGENDA ITEM: Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action:ResolutionOrdinanceContract/AgreementProclamation Policy Issue: John Fallin requests a comprehensive plan amendment for the 1300 McKnight Road North properties. The land use guide and zoning for these properties are currently inconsistent, and the city needs to act to resolve the inconsistency. Recommended Action: Motion to approve an amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Lane Use Map to re-guide the parcels located at 1300 McKnight Road North from High-Density Residential to Employment. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on February 7, 2025. The initial 60-day review deadline is April 8, 2025. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days, if necessary, to complete the application review. The city elected to extend the deadline to June 7, 2025, to facilitate the review schedule. Background: The 1300 McKnight Road North properties are currently zoned M1 – Light Manufacturing. The site was previously home to Origination, an animal feed distributor, but has been dormant for several years. This site has an active conditional use permit approval for a building within 350 feet of a residential district and for outdoor storage. The permit was approved in 1998 and revised in 1999 and 2010. Even though Origination has not been active for several years, the permit is still valid for a new user to operate under. The 2010 conditional use permit resolution is attached to this report. Council Packet Page Number 352 of 375 J3 During the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update, the site was guided to High-Density Residential. The city held off on rezoning the site while the property owner studied it for residential use. Staff is aware of several efforts made by the property owner to develop this site as residential. The property owner has concluded that he no longer wants to pursue residential options and believes the site should stay industrial. To be consistent with the site’s zoning—M1—Light Manufacturing—the city needs to guide the site to Employment. The property owner is working to lease the property to a user who intends to comply with the site’s conditional use permit's existing approvals. Any required official review of potential users will come later. A potential user will be required to submit a proposed use statement and site plan for staff review to ensure consistency with the existing conditional use permit. Staff supports the comprehensive plan amendment to guide these properties as Employment, which is consistent with zoning and the conditional use permit approved for this site. This action also accounts for the site’s rail line proximity and access, plus the market changes since the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update due to Saint Paul’s approval of the nearby Heights project. Commission Review March 18, 2025: The planning commission reviewed, held a public hearing, and recommended approval of this amendment. Citizen Comments Staff sent public hearing notices to the 204 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site. Staff did not receive any comments. Reference Information Site Description Campus Size: 32.9 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses North: Railroad and single-family homes East: Open space and multi-family residential South: Single-family homes and Beaver Lake Estates West: Single-family homes and City of Saint Paul Planning Existing Land Use: High-Density Residential (Proposed to be amended to Employment) Existing Zoning: Light Manufacturing Attachments: 1.Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution 2.Overview Map 3.2040 Future Land Use Map 4.Zoning Map 5.Applicant’s Narrative 6.May 10, 2010 Conditional Use Permit Resolution 7.Planning Commission Minutes, March 18, 2025 Council Packet Page Number 353 of 375 Attachment 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 John Fallin has requested approval of a comprehensive plan amendment. 1.02 The properties are located at 1300 McKnight Road North and are legally described as: PINs: 242922330064 and 242922310012. That part of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota bounded as follows: On the North by a line drawn parallel with and distant 95 feet Southeasterly, as measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of said railway company, as now located and established; on the West by the East line of the West 66 feet of the Southwest Quarter of Said Section 24 to a point on the West line of said Section 24 which is distant 450 feet South of the Southerly line of the 100 foot right of way of said railway company, said Southerly line being a line drawn parallel with and 56 feet Southeasterly as measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of said railway company as originally located and established, and on the East by the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24; excepting therefrom that part that lies Northwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 8.5 feet Southeasterly, as measured at right angles from the center line of the most Southerly side track I.C.C. N.o. 114 of said railway company, as now located and established all in the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. EXCEPT that part of said West Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24, lying easterly of the centerline of the 99 foot wide road easement as described in document No. 2325930. Section 2. Criteria. 2.01 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan states the document may require amending due to a property owner request to change land use designation to allow a proposed development or redevelopment. 2.02 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan amendment process follows the same City identified public hearing process as the major update process used to develop the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Amendments are required to submit and gain approval from the Metropolitan Council. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The requested amendment would meet various amendment criteria outlined in the 2040 Comprehensive Guide Plan. Council Packet Page Number 354 of 375 Attachment 1 Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this amendment request. 1.On March 18, 2025, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this resolution. 2.On April 14, 2025, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The city council above-described comprehensive plan amendment is ________ based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to and only effective upon the following conditions: 1.Review and approval by the Metropolitan Council as provided by state statute. 2.All users must comply with all conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. 10-05-395 for a conditional use permit approved by the Maplewood City Council on May 10, 2010. Council Packet Page Number 355 of 375 Attachment 2 1300 McKnight Road - Map February 7, 2025 City of Maplewood Legend ! I 0925 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Council Packet Page Number 356 of 375 Attachment 3 1300 McKnight Road - 2040 Future Land Use Map February 7, 2025 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Future Land Use - 2040 Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Public/Institutional Open Space Park 0925 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Council Packet Page Number 357 of 375 Attachment 4 1300 McKnight Road - Zoning Map February 7, 2025 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Zoning Single Dwelling (r1) Double Dwelling (r2) Multiple Dwelling (r3) Planned Unit Development (pud) Farm (f) Open Space/Park Light Manufacturing (m1) Neighborhood Commercial (nc) 0925 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Council Packet Page Number 358 of 375 Attachment 5 STATEMENT DESCRIBING INTENDED USE The intended use will match the current zoning M-1 Light Industrial. We are applying for comp plan amendment so that the 2040 Comprehensive Plan will be consistent with the current zoning M-1. Council Packet Page Number 359 of 375 Attachment 6 Council Packet Page Number 360 of 375 Attachment 6 Council Packet Page Number 361 of 375 Attachment 6 Council Packet Page Number 362 of 375 Attachment 7 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 7:00 P.M. Tuesday, , 2025 City Hall, Council Chambers 1830 County Road B East E.PUBLIC HEARING 2.Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution, 1300 McKnight Road North Michael Martin, AICP, Community Development Director, gave the presentation and answered questions from the commission. Chairperson Desai opened the public hearing. The following individuals addressed the commission regarding the project: Chris Greene, 2351 Tilsen Ave E Toni Thorwick, 2285 Tilsen Court E Chairperson Desai closed the public hearing. Commissioner Oszman moved to approve an amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Lane Use Map to re-guide the parcels located at 1300 McKnight Road North from High-Density Residential to Employment. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 John Fallin has requested approval of a comprehensive plan amendment. 1.02 The properties are located at 1300 McKnight Road North and are legally described as: PINs: 242922330064 and 242922310012. That part of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota bounded as follows: On the North by a line drawn parallel with and distant 95 feet Southeasterly, as measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of said railway company, as now located and established; on the West by the East line of the West 66 feet of the Southwest Quarter of Said Section 24 to a point on the West line of said Section 24 which is distant 450 feet South of the Southerly line of the 100 foot right of way of said railway company, said Southerly line being a line drawn parallel with and 56 feet Southeasterly as measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of said railway company as originally located and established, and on the East by the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24; excepting therefrom that part that lies Council Packet Page Number 363 of 375 Attachment 7 Northwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 8.5 feet Southeasterly, as measured at right angles from the center line of the most Southerly side track I.C.C. N.o. 114 of said railway company, as now located and established all in the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. EXCEPT that part of said West Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24, lying easterly of the centerline of the 99 foot wide road easement as described in document No. 2325930. Section 2. Criteria. 2.01 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan states the document may require amending due to a property owner request to change land use designation to allow a proposed development or redevelopment. 2.02 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan amendment process follows the same City identified public hearing process as the major update process used to develop the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Amendments are required to submit and gain approval from the Metropolitan Council. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The requested amendment would meet various amendment criteria outlined in the 2040 Comprehensive Guide Plan. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this amendment request. 1.On March 18, 2025, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this resolution. 2.On April 14, 2025, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The city council above-described comprehensive plan amendment is ________ based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to and only effective upon the following conditions: 1.Review and approval by the Metropolitan Council as provided by state statute. 2.All users must comply with all conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. 10-05-395 for a conditional use permit approved by the Maplewood City Council on May 10, 2010. Council Packet Page Number 364 of 375 Attachment 7 Seconded by Commissioner Yang Ayes – All The motion passed. This item will go to the city council on April 14, 2025. Council Packet Page Number 365 of 375 For the permanent record: Meeting Date: 4/14/2025 Agenda Item J3, Additional Attachment t n e m d n e m A d n a a l o P R e t v h i g s i n n e K h c e r M p 0 Property owner requestinga comprehensive plan amendment for the 1300 McKnight Road North propertiesThe land use guide and zoning for these properties are currently inconsistentThe city needs to act to resolve the inconsistency m 0 ¤¤¤ o 3 C1 For the permanent record: Meeting Date: 4/14/2025 Agenda Item J3, Additional Attachment t n e m d n e m A d n a a l o P R e t v h i g s i n n e K h c e r M p 0 FLU: High Density Residential Zoning: Light Manufacturing m 0 ¤¤ o 3 Current Controls of PropertiesSite guided to High-Density Residential during 2040 Comprehensive Plan update The city held off on rezoning while the property owner considered residential projectsƚ ĬĻ ĭƚƓƭźƭƷĻƓƷ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ ƭźƷĻ͸ƭ ǩƚƓźƓŭͲ ƷŷĻ ĭźƷǤ ƓĻĻķƭ to guide the site to Employment C1 ¤¤¤¤ For the permanent record: Meeting Date: 4/14/2025 Agenda Item J3, Additional Attachment t n e m d n e m A d n a a l o P R e t v h i g s i n n e K h c e r M p Animal feed distributorPermit was approved in 1998Revised in 1999 and 2010 0 m 0¤¤¤ o 3 Site was previously home to OriginationSite has an active conditional use permit approval for a building within 350 feet of a residential district and for outdoor storageEven though Origination has not been active for several years, the permit is still valid for a new user to operate under C1¤ ¤¤ For the permanent record: Meeting Date: 4/14/2025 Agenda Item J3, Additional Attachment t n e m d n e m A d n a a l o P R e t v h i g s i n n e K h c e r Changes would require an amendment M p ¤ 0 Any future user will be required to submit a proposed use statement and site plan for staff review to ensure consistency with the existing conditional use permitPublic hearing notice sent to properties within 500 feet. Planning Commission held the hearing and recommended approval m 0 ¤¤ o 3 C1 For the permanent record: Meeting Date: 4/14/2025 Agenda Item J3, Additional Attachment t n e m d n e m Motion to approve an amendment to the 2040 A d n a a l o P R e t v h i g s i n n e K h c Consistency between comprehensive plan and zoning is required by state lawProperty owner made an effort to redevelop as a residential projectFactors related tomarket changesAccess to rail e r ¤¤¤¤ M p Staff recommends approval Recommended Action:Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map to guide the parcels located at 1300 McKnight Road North from High-Density Residential to Employment 0 ¤¤ m 0 o 3 C1 J4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Joe Rueb, Finance Director PRESENTER:Joe Rueb, Finance Director AGENDA ITEM: Financial Management Plan Proposal from Ehlers Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: A long-term Financial Management Plan (FMP) is a tool to help identify the financial needs of the City and the potential impacts on property taxes and other funding sources. Ehlers can provide an impartial assessment of financial practices, helping identify areas of improvement that might be overlooked internally. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the proposal from Ehlers to prepare a ten-year financial management plan. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is not-to-exceed $36,000. Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: Fund Balance Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment The FMP serves as an essential mechanism to guide financial decisions as the City prepares for the 2026 budget and beyond. By aligning financial planning with broader City goals, this initiative will help achieve long-term success. Background: In light of the City’s long-term financial goals and the complexities of managing resources effectively, staff proposes the engagement of Ehlers to develop a comprehensive ten-year FMP. This strategic initiative will ensure sustainable growth, financial stability, and alignment with overarching budget objectives. Council Packet Page Number 366 of 375 J4 Ehlers will bring specialized knowledge in forecasting, budgeting, and scenario analysis. Their insights can help the City anticipate economic trends and adjust strategies proactively. A detailed FMP offers a clear roadmap for resource allocation, investment opportunities, and risk management. Structured financial goals and milestones will provide benchmarks for tracking performance and ensuring accountability across departments. By planning ahead, the City can prepare for challenges and unexpected disruptions, ensuring the City’s financial resilience over time. A ten-year FMP will demonstrate Council’s commitment to proactive and strategic financial stewardship. The expertise and foresight of Ehlers will be instrumental in crafting a ten-year FMP that secures the City’s future for Maplewood’s residents, businesses and guests. Staff recommends the approval of the attached proposal from Ehlers as their team has relevant experience and proven success in long-term financial planning. Attachments: 1. Proposal from Ehlers Council Packet Page Number 367 of 375 J4, Attachment 1 Bqsjm!25-!3136 Kpf!Svfc Gjobodf!Ejsfdups Djuz!pg!Nbqmfxppe 2941!F!Dpvouz!Spbe!C Nbqmfxppe-!NO6621:.3813 SF;!Qspqptbm!gps!b!Mpoh.Ufsn!Gjobodjbm!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo! EfbsKpf-! Po!cfibmg!pg!Fimfst-!xf!bsfqmfbtfe!up!qsftfou!uijt!qspqptbm!up!voefsublf!dvtupnj{fe! mpoh.ufsn!gjobodjbm!qmboojoh!gps!uif!Djuz!pg!Nbqmfxppe)”Djuz•*/!Xf!bsf!hsbufgvm!gps! uif!pqqpsuvojuz!up!dpoujovf!up!qspwjef!wbmvf!upuif!Djuzboe!ipqf!uijt!qspqptbm! efnpotusbuft!pvs!ufbn“t!dpmmfdujwf!dpnnjunfou!boe!rvbmjgjdbujpot!up!efmjwfs!ezobnjd! boe!qsbdujdbm!gjobodjoh!qmboojoh/! Xf!voefstuboe!uif!Djuzjt!dpotjefsjoh!nbkps!tusffu!jnqspwfnfou!qspkfdut-!gbdjmjuz! vqhsbeft-!boe!puifs!dbqjubm!qspkfdutjo!uif!ofbs!gvuvsf/!Jo!beejujpo-!uif!Djuz!boujdjqbuft! uif!offe!gps!beejujpobm!qvcmjd!tbgfuz!qfstpoofm-!bmm!xijmf!tubcjmj{joh!uif!qspqfsuz!uby! mfwz-!xijdi!ibt!tffo!tjhojgjdbou!jodsfbtft!jo!sfdfou!zfbst/!Uif!Djuzxpvme!mjlf!up! efwfmpq!b!mpoh.ufsn!Gjobodjbm!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo)”GNQ•*bt!b!uppm!up!ifmq!jefoujgzuif! gjobodjbmoffet!pg!uif!Djuz!boe!uif!qpufoujbmjnqbdut!po!qspqfsuz!ubyft!boe!puifs! gvoejoh!tpvsdft/ Uif!GNQ!xjmm!bddpnqmjti!opu!pomz!uijt!cvu!xjmm!cf!b!wfijdmf!up!efufsnjof!bqqspqsjbuf! sftfswf!cbmbodft!gps!wbsjpvt!gvoet-!qspwjef!b!tusbufhjd!gsbnfxpsl!gps!ujnjoh!boe! qsjpsjuj{bujpo!pg!qspkfdut!up!nffu!offet!xijmf!cbmbodjoh!mfwz!jnqbdut!boe!efufsnjof! puifs!bqqspqsjbuf!gvoejoh!tpvsdft/!Ju!xjmm!mfu!vt!btl-!”Xibu!jg@•!boe!fyqmpsf!uiptf rvftujpot!xijmf!efwfmpqjoh!b!dpnqsfifotjwf!gvoejoh!tusbufhz!gps!uif!mpoh.ufsn! pqfsbujoh!boe!dbqjubm!offet!pg!uif!Djuz/! Gjobodjbm!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo! Uif!GNQ!jt!b!21.zfbs-!mpoh.ufsn!pqfsbujoh!cvehfu!boe!dbqjubm!jnqspwfnfou!qmbo!xjui! b!gvoejoh!tusbufhz!efwfmpqfe!uispvhi!gbdjmjubufe!ejtdvttjpot!xjui!tubgg!boe!Dpvodjm/!Ju! xjmm!hvjef!uifDjuz“tgjobodjbm!gvuvsf!boe!efufsnjof!ipx!uif!Djuzdbo!gvoejut!dbqjubm! Council Packet Page Number 368 of 375 J4, Attachment 1 offetboe!puifs!bdujwjujft/!Fimfst!xjmm!cvjme!b!dvtupnj{feNjdsptpguFydfm!npefm!gps!uif! Djuzxjui!dbtigmpx!qspkfdujpot!gps!fbdi!gvoe!uibu!spmm.vq!joup!b!tvnnbsz!gpsfdbtu/ Model Inputs: CIP, Decision Making: Base Financial Results: Individual Master Model that Information, Capital Fund Cashflow shows impacts of Needs, New Staff and Projections financial decisions Growth Xf!qspqptfjodmvejoh!uif!gpmmpxjoh!gvoet!jo!uif!GNQ;! Hfofsbm!Gvoe Tusffu!Sfwjubmj{bujpo!Gvoe Hfofsbm!Cvjmejoh!Sfqmbdfnfou!Gvoe Dpnnvojuz!Dfoufs!Cvjmejoh!Jnqspwfnfout!Gvoe Dbqjubm!Jnqspwfnfou!Qspkfdut!Gvoe Qpmjdf!Wfijdmft!boe!Frvjqnfou!Gvoe Gjsf!Tubujpo!Gvoe Jogpsnbujpo!Ufdiopmphz!Gvoe Gmffu!Nbobhfnfou!Gvoe Nbqmfxppe!Bsfb!Fdpopnjd!Efwfmpqnfou!BvuipsjuzGvoe Bncvmbodf!Gvoe Bt!qbsu!pg!efwfmpqjoh!uif!GNQ-!Fimfst!xjmm!fohbhf!uif!Djuz!Dpvodjmjo!gbdjmjubufe! ejtdvttjpot!up!efwfmpq!dpotfotvt!sfhbsejoh!uif!gjobodjbm!ejsfdujpo!pg!uif!Djuz/!Xf!xjmm! pwfswjfx!xibu!uif!GNQ!jt-!uif!qspdftt!uibu!jt!voefsublfo!xjui!tubgg-!joqvut!boe! jnqbdut-!qpmjdz!efdjtjpot!boe!qspkfdujpot/!Cz!voefstuboejoh!uif!gjobodjbm!jnqbdut!pg! efdjtjpot-!uif!Djuz!Dpvodjmdbo!ftubcmjti!tqfoejoh!qsjpsjujft!boe!efwfmpq!dpotfotvt! bcpvu!bo!bddfqubcmf!mfwfm!pg!qspqfsuz!ubyft!boe!puifs!sfwfovft/!Uif!GNQ!xjmm!qspwjef! uif!Djuz!Dpvodjmboe!qvcmjd!xjui!bo!voefstuboejoh!pg!ipx!upebz“t!efdjtjpot!xjmm!bggfdu! dpotujuvfout!jo!uif!gvuvsf/ Tubgg!boe!Dpvodjm!Nffujohtgps!uif!GNQ Uif!tdpqf!pg!xpsl!boujdjqbuft!vq!up!uisffnffujoht!xjui!tubgg!boe!uxp!nffujoht!xjui! uif!Djuz!Dpvodjm/!Evsjoh!uif!jojujbm!tubgg!nffujoh-!xf!xjmm!ejtdvtt!qpmjdz!jttvft!upqsfqbsf! b!cbtfmjof!npefm!pg!uif!Djuz“t!gjobodjbm!dpoejujpo!uibu!jodpsqpsbuft!fyjtujoh!pqfsbujpot-! Qbhf!}!3!! Council Packet Page Number 369 of 375 J4, Attachment 1 ofx!tubgg!boe!jojujbujwft-!qmvt!bmm!qspqptfe!dbqjubm!fyqfoejuvsft/!Uijt!cbtfmjof!npefm! xjmm!tipx!gjobodjbm!jnqbdut!sfmbufe!up!gvoe!cbmbodft-!uby!jnqbdut-!boe!bqqbsfou!usfoet! boe!xjmm!cf!sfwjfxfe!jo!b!tvctfrvfou!nffujoh!xjui!tubgg/!Uijt!jt!uif!tubsujoh!qmbdf!gps! uif!dpowfstbujpo!xjui!Djuz!Dpvodjm/!Bu!uif!gjstu!Djuz!Dpvodjm!xpsltipq-!xf!xjmm!tipx! uif!gjobodjbm!jnqbdu!pg!bddpnqmjtijoh!bmm!uif!Djuz“t!hpbmt!boe!efufsnjof!jg!qsjpsjujft! offe!up!cf!tfu!cfuxffo!dpnqfujoh!gvoejoh!efnboet/! ! Cbtfe!po!tubgg!boe!Djuz!Dpvodjm!ejsfdujpo-!xf!uifo!sfgjof!uif!GNQ!xjui!vq!up!uxp! tdfobsjpt!uibu!bmufs!uif!ujnjoh!pg!dbqjubm!qspkfdut!boe!tubggjoh!beejujpot-!bnpoh!puifs! dpotjefsbujpot/!Bgufs!tpmjdjujoh!beejujpobm!gffecbdl-!xf!xjmm!efwfmpq!b!gjtdbm!tusbufhz! boe!nblf!sfdpnnfoebujpot!po!gjobodjbm!qpmjdjft!bu!b!tfdpoe!Djuz!Dpvodjm!nffujoh!ps! xpsl!tfttjpo/! ! Gjobodjbm!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo!Efmjwfsbcmft! Uif!GNQ!xjmm!efmjwfs!bo!bdijfwbcmf-!dpnqsfifotjwf!gjobodjbm!qmbo!uibu!ibt!cffo! sfwjfxfe!cz!boe!bhsffe!vqpo!cz!uif!Djuz!Dpvodjm/!Uif!GNQ!jodmveft;! Boovbm!qspkfdufe!cvehfu!ovncfst!gps!fbdi!pg!uif!ofyu!21!zfbst! Jodmvtjpo!pg!bmm!dbqjubm!jnqspwfnfout!jefoujgjfe!cz!uif!Djuz! Jodmvtjpo!pg!beejujpobm!tubggjoh!boe!sfmbufe!frvjqnfou!)jg!bqqmjdbcmf*! Uby!jnqbdut! Gbdjmjubufe!ejtdvttjpot!up!sfbdi!dpotfotvt!po!qsjpsjuj{bujpo!pg!qspkfdut! Qsftfoubujpo!nbufsjbmt!boe!buufoebodf!bu!vq!up!uxp!qvcmjd!nffujoht! ! Nptu!jnqpsuboumz-!uif!GNQ!qspdftt!xjmm!sftvmu!jo!b!gfbtjcmf!gvoejoh!qmbo!gps!uif!Djuz“t! pqfsbujpot!boe!dbqjubm!qspkfdut-!bt!gvsuifs!eftdsjcfe!jo!Bqqfoejy!B/!! ! Qspkfdu!Ufbn!'!Tdifevmf! Uif!Qspkfdu!Ufbn!gps!uif!GNQ!xjmm!dpotjtu!pg!Csvdf!Ljnnfm-!Ebo!Ujfoufs-!Fmj{bcfui!Ejb{! boe!Bqsjm!Xfmmfs/!Csvdf!xjmm!pwfstff!uif!qspkfdu/!Ebo!xjmm!buufoe!uif!Djuz!Dpvodjm! nffujoht-!bt!xfmm!bt!nffujoht!xjui!Djuz!tubgg/!Fmj{bcfui!boe!Bqsjm!xjmm!dpnqmfuf!uif! ovnfsjdbm!bobmztjt/!Uphfuifs-!uijt!ufbn!ibt!pwfs!61!zfbst!pg!fyqfsjfodf/! ! Efqfoejoh!po!uif!bwbjmbcjmjuz!pg!gjobodjbm!ebub-!dbqjubm!jnqspwfnfou!qmbot!boe!tubggjoh! offet-!bo!bobmztjt!pg!uif!bcpwf!gvoet!dbo!cf!dpnqmfufe!xjuijo!gpvs!npouit/!Uif!foujsf! GNQ!dbo!cf!dpnqmfufe!cz!mbuf!Tvnnfs0fbsmz!Gbmm!up!jogpsn!uif!3137!cvehfu!dzdmf/!! ! !! Qbhf!}!4!! Council Packet Page Number 370 of 375 J4, Attachment 1 Qspqptfe!Dptu Fimfst!qspqptft!up!dpnqmfuf!uif!GNQ!gps!uif!opu.up.fydffe!dptu!pg!%47-111/!Xf! qspqptf!uibu!uif!qspkfdu!xjmm!cf!cjmmfe!ipvsmz!bu!uif!ipvsmz!sbuf!pg!%3:6-!gpsbduvbm!ipvst! xpslfe!tp!uibu!uif!gjobm!dptu!nbz!cf!mftt/Bt!uif!qspkfdu!vogpmet-!Fimfst!xjmm!jowpjdf! npouimz!gps!uif!xpsl!dpnqmfufe!jo!uif!qsjps!npoui!xjui!eftdsjqujpot!pg!qspkfdu! bdujwjujft!boe!ujnf!fyqfoefe/ Fimfst!jt!dpnnjuufe!up!efmjwfsjoh-!boe!tipxjoh!wbmvf-!jo!pvs!xpsl/Uibol!zpv!gps! fohbhjoh!xjui!vt!jo!zpvs!gjobodjbm!qmboojoh!ejtdvttjpo/!Xf!bqqsfdjbuf!zpvs! dpotjefsbujpo!boe!mppl!gpsxbse!up!ejtdvttjoh!ipx!Fimfst!dbo!cftu!tfswf!uif!Djuz/! Tjodfsfmz- !!!!! !!! !!! Csvdf!Ljnnfm!!!!EbojfmUjfoufs Tfojps!Nvojdjqbm!Bewjtps!!!Nvojdjqbm!Bewjtps )762*!7:8.9683!!!!!)762*!7:8.9648! Qbhf!}!5!! Council Packet Page Number 371 of 375 J4, Attachment 1 Bqqfoejy!B;!Tdpqf!pg!Xpsl! Uif!Gjobodjbm!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo!)”GNQ•*!xjmm!cf!dpnqmfufe!jo!uif!gpmmpxjoh!hfofsbm! tufqt/! ! Tufq!2/!Sfwjfx!Djuz“t!dvssfou!gjobodjbm!qptjujpo-!qpmjdjft-!boe!qsbdujdft/!! Tufq!3/!!Bhhsfhbuf!boe!pvumjof!bmm!gvuvsf!dbqjubm!offet!boe!qsphsbn!sfrvftut!gspn! Djuz!tubgg!boe!dpotvmubout/!B!dpnqsfifotjwf!mjtu!pg!nbkps!dbqjubm!jufnt!boe! pqfsbujpobm!offet!xjmm!cf!efwfmpqfe!xjui!uif!tubgg!mfbefstijq/! ! Tufq!4/!Bttjtu!jo!jefoujgzjoh!puifs!qpmjdz!jttvft!up!cf!ejtdvttfe!boe!ftubcmjti!b! gsbnfxpsl!gps!tvdi!ejtdvttjpo/! Tufq!5/!Fwbmvbuf!uif!jnqbdu!pg!boz!uby!cbtf!dibohft/!Qpufoujbm!dibohft!jo!uif!uby! cbtf!evf!up!hspxui-!sfefwfmpqnfou!ps!boujdjqbufe!cvtjoftt!dmptvsft!xjmm!cf! jodmvefe!jo!uif!GNQ!npefm-!bt!xfmm!bt!fyqjsjoh!UJG!Ejtusjdut!)jg!bqqmjdbcmf*/!! Tufq!6/!Dsfbuf!uif!GNQ!Cbtf!Npefm!uibu!tipxt!uif!jnqbdu!pg!jodmvejoh!bmm!dbqjubm! sfrvftut/!Uif!Npefm!xjmm!gpmmpx!uif!Djuz“t!gjobodjbm!tubufnfout!boe!tipx! qspkfdufe!foejoh!gvoe!cbmbodft!gps!fbdi!gvoe!gps!fbdi!pg!uif!ofyu!ufo!zfbst/! ! Tufq!7/!Bobmz{f!pqujpot!up!cftu!nffu!uif!Djuz“t!offet/Pqujpot!njhiu!jodmvef! wbszjoh!uif!ujnjoh!pg!dbqjubm!qspkfdut-!dibohjoh!dbqjubm!gvoejoh!qpmjdjft-!ps! npefmjoh!bmufsobujwf!sfwfovf!tpvsdft/!Uif!gjobodjbm!jnqbdu-!jodmvejoh! efufsnjojoh!cpoe!sbujoh!jnqbdu)t*-!pg!vq!up!uxp!)3*!tdfobsjpt!xjmm!cf!tipxo/! ! Tufq!8/!!Qsfqbsf!bo!bdijfwbcmf-!dpnqsfifotjwf!gjobodjbm!qmbouibu!ifmqt!uif!Djuz!gvoe! dbqjubm!boe!pqfsbujoh!qsjpsjujft!boe!cvjmet!Dpvodjm!dpotfotvt/! ! Qbhf!}!6!! Council Packet Page Number 372 of 375 J5 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date April 14, 2025 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Mondor, Fire and EMS Chief PRESENTER: Michael Mondor, Fire and EMS Chief AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Support for Community Project Funding Request Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: There is a need to expand the East Metro Public Safety Training Facility to ensure adequate public safety preparedness and response capabilities for first responders. Without expanded capacity, the facility will not be able to meet the future training needs of public safety agencies. Supporting this infrastructure directly impacts the safety of first responders and the communities they serve. Federal funding could reduce the financial burden of the proposed expansion. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the resolution supporting a funding request for the Fiscal Year 2026 Community Project Funding. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt. Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment This project would encourage collaboration between public safety disciplines, improving operational effectiveness in our community. Securing federal funding for the expansion project demonstrates the City’s commitment to responsible fiscal management by leveraging external resources to enhance this regional asset. Background The East Metro Public Safety Training Facility was constructed in 2014. The facility was primarily built to meet firefighting training needs. The challenges facing public safety today are more dynamic than in the past. We have experienced the benefits of firefighters, police officers, EMS professionals, and embedded social workers coming together to serve the community. As the Council Packet Page Number 373 of 375 J5 community’s expectations for public safety increase, training facilities are not keeping up with demand. Unfortunately, the East Metro Public Safety Training Facility is rarely utilized by law enforcement, EMS agencies, and embedded social workers due to a lack of law enforcement/EMS functionality and, most recently, a lack of availability. Additional funding would allow fire, police, EMS, and embedded social workers to train side-by-side in de-escalation, incident command, reality-based training, and rescue operations. Incorporating first responder mental and physical health components into the facility is also important. Community Project Funding (CPF) is a federal funding mechanism that allows members of Congress to request funding for specific projects that benefit their constituents. Staff submitted a CPF request in FY2025, unfortunately none of those projects were funded. Staff have prepared a FY2026 CPF request and are requesting that the City Council adopt a resolution in support of this request. This funding would support for the creation of a true public safety training facility which would serve communities throughout the region and the State of Minnesota. Attachments 1. Resolution Council Packet Page Number 374 of 375 J5, Attachment 1 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION SUPPORTING COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING REQUEST FOR THE EAST METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY WHEREAS, the United States Congress has a Community Project Funding program that allows members of Congress to request funding for specific projects that benefit their constituents; and WHEREAS, the East Metro Public Safety Training Facility is a regional asset; and WHEREAS, the East Metro Public Safety Training Facility is eligible for Community Project Funding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota grants approval and support for staff to submit a Community Project Funding Request to support the expansion of the East Metro Public Safety Training Facility. th day of April, 2025. Approved this 14 Council Packet Page Number 375 of 375