HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024 11-19 Planning Commission PacketMeeting is also available on Comcast Ch. 16 and streaming vod.maplewoodmn.gov
AGENDA
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION
7:00 P.M. Tuesday, November 19, 2024
City Hall, Council Chambers
1830 County Road B East A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. September 17, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes E. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Ordinance Amending Section 44-22 of the Maplewood City Code Related to Reasonable Accommodations, Including Moving the Section to a New Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 1 F. NEW BUSINESS
1. Capital Improvement Plan 2025-2029 Planning Commission G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None H. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS I. STAFF PRESENTATIONS None J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS – 3 minute time limit per person K. ADJOURNMENT
WELCOME TO THIS MEETING OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
This outline has been prepared to help you understand the public meeting process.
The review of an item usually takes the following form:
1. The chairperson of the meeting will announce the item to be reviewed and ask for the
staff report on the subject.
2. Staff presents their report on the matter.
3. The Commission will then ask City staff questions about the proposal.
4. The chairperson will then ask the audience if there is anyone present who wishes to
comment on the proposal.
5. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal.
Please step up to the podium and speak clearly. Give your name and address first and
then your comments.
6. After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his or her comments, the
chairperson will close the public discussion portion of the meeting.
7. The Commission will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed.
8. The Commission will then make its recommendation or decision.
9. All decisions by the Planning Commission are recommendations to the City Council. The
City Council makes the final decision.
“Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood Planning Commission. It is our desire to
keep all discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a
Public Hearing or to address the Planning Commission, please familiarize yourself with
the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. At
the podium please state your name and address clearly for the record.”
Revised: 02/18
September 17, 2024
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 1
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
7:00 P.M. Tuesday, September 17, 2024
City Hall, Council Chambers
1830 County Road B East
A. CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the Commission was held and called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairperson Desai
B. ROLL CALL
Tushar Desai, Chairperson Present
Lue Yang, Vice Chairperson Present
Paul Arbuckle, Commissioner Absent
John Eads, Commissioner Present
Allan Ige, Commissioner Present
Tom Oszman, Commissioner Present
Staff Present: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chairperson Desai moved to approve the agenda as presented.
Seconded by Commissioner Eads Ayes – All
The motion passed.
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. July 16, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Commissioner Ige moved to approve the July 16, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes as
submitted.
Seconded by Commissioner Oszman Ayes – Vice Chairperson Yang
Commissioner Eads
Commissioner Ige
Commissioner Oszman
Abstain – Chairperson Desai
The motion passed.
E. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Conditional Use Permit Resolution, Harriet Tubman Center East, 2675 Larpenteur Avenue East
Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director, gave the presentation.
Chairperson Desai opened the public hearing.
D1
Planning Commission Packet Page 3 of 40
September 17, 2024
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 2
The following individuals addressed the commission regarding the project:
Jennifer Polzin, Tubman
Chairperson Desai closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Oszman moved to approve a resolution for a conditional use permit for Harriet
Tubman Center East to allow an exterior dog run and expanded use of its commercial kitchen
located at 2675 Larpenteur Avenue East.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. Background.
1.01 Harriet Tubman Center East has requested a conditional use permit to allow an exterior
dog run and expanded use of its commercial kitchen.
1.02 The property is located at 2675 Larpenteur Avenue East and is legally described as:
Century Trails Common Lot 2 Block 1
The PID for the property is 13-29-22-44-0004.
Section 2. Standards.
2.01 City Ordinance Section 44-1092(3) requires a Conditional Use Permit for an institution of
any educational, philanthropic or charitable nature.
2.02 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. City Ordinance Section 44-1097(a) states that
the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine
standards for approval.
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
D1
Planning Commission Packet Page 4 of 40
September 17, 2024
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 3
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and
scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Section 3. Findings.
3.01 The proposal meets the specific conditional use permit standards.
Section 4. City Review Process
4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this conditional use permit
request.
1. On September 17, 2024, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff
published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that
the city council approve this resolution.
2. On September 23, 2024, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered
reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
Section 5. City Council
5.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined
in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. Staff may approve
minor changes.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or
the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one
year.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
4. This permit allows the Tubman Center East to continue its previously approved use of
shelter housing. It also permits the applicant’s support activities such as a legal center,
offices, counseling services group rooms, child care, playground, classrooms,
community gathering spaces, space for collaborative community partnerships,
community gardens, and bus shelters.
5. This permit approves the expanded use of the site’s commercial kitchen. The kitchen
owner and any operators using the facility shall acquire all necessary approvals and
licenses from the state of Minnesota and the City of Maplewood to operate the kitchen
facility.
6. Trucks making deliveries for the kitchen facility shall be limited to 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.
7. This permit approves the exterior dog run, which shall be maintained and operated in
a manner that does not create nuisances for nearby properties.
D1
Planning Commission Packet Page 5 of 40
September 17, 2024
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 4
8. All construction—interior and exterior—related to the dog run and commercial kitchen
on the subject property requires a building permit to be submitted for review and
approval by the Building Official.
9. No supplies or materials are permitted to be stored outside.
10. Any trash and recycling receptacles stored outside must be within an enclosure that
meets city requirements.
Seconded by Commissioner Eads Ayes – All
The motion passed.
This item will go to the city council on September 23, 2024
2. Sign Variance Denial Resolution, Mister Car Wash, 3050 White Bear Avenue North
Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director, gave the presentation.
Chairperson Desai opened the public hearing.
The following individuals addressed the commission regarding the project:
Gary Potts, Professional Permits
Justin Young, Dualite
Chairperson Desai closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Eads moved to approve the resolution to deny the sign variance request for Mister
Car Wash, located at 3050 White Bear Avenue North
SIGN VARIANCE DENIAL RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. Background.
1.01 Mister Car Wash has requested a sign variance to allow for signs on the property that
exceed the number, size, and height permitted.
1.02 The property is located at 3050 White Bear Avenue North and is legally described as:
The South 100.00 feet of the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4, Section
2, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, City of Maplewood, Ramsey County,
Minnesota lying Easterly of White Bear Avenue, except the East 360.0 feet thereof,
AND
The South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4, Section 2, Township 29 North,
Range 22 West, City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying Northerly of
Woodlyn Avenue and Easterly of White Bear Avenue, except the East 360.0 feet
thereof,
AND
The West 181.87 feet of the East 360.0 feet of the South 100.0 feet of the North 1/2
of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North,
Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
AND
D1
Planning Commission Packet Page 6 of 40
September 17, 2024
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 5
The West 181.87 feet of the East 360.0 feet of the South 1 /2 of the Northeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying Northerly of
Woodlynn Avenue.
Tax Parcel Identification: 022922210025
Section 2. Standards.
2.01 Variance Standard. City Ordinance Section 44-13 refers to a state statute that states a
variance may be granted from the requirements of the zoning ordinance when: (1) the
variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this ordinance; (2) when
the variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) when the applicant
establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. Practical
difficulties mean: (1) the proposed use is reasonable; (2) the need for a variance is
caused by circumstances unique to the property, not created by the property owner, and
not solely based on economic conditions; (3) the variance if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the locality.
Section 3. Findings.
3.01 The setback variance request does not meet the required standards for a variance.
1. That the need for a variance is caused by circumstances unique to the property, not
created by the property owner, and not solely based on economic conditions;
2. That the proposed use is reasonable; and
3. That the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality; and
4. That the need for a variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this
ordinance; and
5. That the variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Section 4. City Review Process
4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering the variance requests.
1. On September 17, 2024, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city
staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing
a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission
recommended that the city council approve this resolution.
2. On September 23, 2024, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered
reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
Section 5. City Council
5.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Denial of the application is based on the
findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution.
Seconded by Commissioner Ige Ayes – All
The motion passed.
D1
Planning Commission Packet Page 7 of 40
September 17, 2024
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 6
This item will go to the city council on September 23, 2024
3.Setback Variance Resolution, Larkin Dance Studio, 1400 Highway 36 East
Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director, gave the presentation and
answered questions from the commission.
Chairperson Desai opened the public hearing.
The following individuals addressed the commission regarding the project:
Lance Elliot, Elliot Design Build, Inc
Molly Larkin, Larkin Dance Studio
Michelle Larkin, Larkin Dance Studio
Rita Kruchowski, 1410 Cope Avenue
Chairperson Desai closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Oszman moved to approve a resolution for a setback variance for Larkin Dance
Studio’s expanded parking lot at 1400 Highway 36 East, adding conditions 4, 5, and 6 to section
5.01 of the resolution.
SETBACK VARIANCE RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. Background.
1.01 Larkin Dance Studio has requested a 15-foot setback variance to allow for five parking
stalls within the required 15-foot parking setback.
1.02 The property is located at 1400 Highway 36 and is legally described as:
PARCEL 1:
That part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter (N1/2 of SW1/4) of Section 10,
Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the center of said Section 10, thence Southerly along the East line of the
SW1/4 a distance of 848.3 feet to the intersection of the Southerly right-of-way line of
Trunk Highway No. 36; thence Westerly along the said Southerly right-of-way line a
distance of 1,196.20 feet, thence deflecting to the left 90 degrees and along said right-of-
way line a distance of 25 feet, thence deflecting to the right 90 degrees and along said
right-of-way line a distance of 93.46 feet to an iron, said point being the intersection of
West line of the East 39 acres and the said Trunk Highway No. 36 Southerly right-of-way
line and the point of beginning; thence Westerly along said right-of-way line a distance of
233.30 feet, thence Southerly and parallel with the West line of the East 39 acres a
distance of 250.00 feet, thence Easterly and parallel with the Southerly right-of-way line a
distance of 233.30 feet to a point on the West line of the East 39 acres, thence Northerly
along said West line a distance of 250 feet to the point of beginning.
PARCEL 2:
D1
Planning Commission Packet Page 8 of 40
September 17, 2024
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 7
That part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter (N1/2 of SW1/4) of Section 10,
Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the center of said Section 10, thence Southerly along the East line of the
SW1/4 a distance of 848.3 feet to the intersection of the Southerly right-of-way line of
Trunk Highway No. 36, thence Westerly along the said Southerly right-of-way line a
distance of 1,196.20 feet, thence deflecting to the left 90 degrees and along the said right-
of-way line a distance of 25 feet, thence deflecting to the right 90 degrees and along said
right-of-way line a distance of 93.46 feet, to an iron, said point being the intersection of
West line of the East 39 acres and the said Trunk Highway No. 36 Southerly right-of-way
line, thence Westerly along said right-of-way line a distance of 233.30 feet, thence
Southerly and parallel with the West line of the East 39 acres a distance of 250.00 feet to
the point of beginning, thence continuing along the same line a distance of 189.15 feet to
a point on the South line of said N1/2 of SW1/4 of Section 10, thence Easterly along the
said South line a distance of 233.30 feet to a point on the West line of the said East 39
acres, thence Northerly along said West line a distance of 188.86 feet, thence Westerly
parallel with the said Southerly right-of-way a distance of 233.30 feet to the point of
beginning.
Tax Parcel Identification: 10-29-22-32-0027
Section 2. Standards.
2.01 Variance Standard. City Ordinance Section 44-13 refers to a state statute that states a
variance may be granted from the requirements of the zoning ordinance when: (1) the
variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this ordinance; (2) when
the variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) when the applicant
establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. Practical
difficulties mean: (1) the proposed use is reasonable; (2) the need for a variance is
caused by circumstances unique to the property, not created by the property owner, and
not solely based on economic conditions; (3) the variance if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the locality.
Section 3. Findings.
3.01 The setback variance request does meet the required standards for a variance.
1. That the need for a variance is caused by circumstances unique to the property, not
created by the property owner, and not solely based on economic conditions;
2. That the proposed use is reasonable; and
3. That the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality; and
4. That the need for a variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this
ordinance; and
5. That the variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Section 4. City Review Process
4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering the variance requests.
1. On September 17, 2024, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city
staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing
D1
Planning Commission Packet Page 9 of 40
September 17, 2024
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 8
a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission
recommended that the city council approve this resolution.
2. On October 14, 2024, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered
reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
Section 5. City Council
5.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval of the application is based on
the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following
conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the approved site plan. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor changes.
2. The approval permits a 15-foot variance to construct the parking lot up to the property
line. The applicant cannot encroach into the right-of-way with the parking lot.
3. The city engineer and environmental staff shall review and approve the final
landscape plan before issuing a grading permit.
4. Require that all building lights on the main and accessory buildings that aim
south towards Cope Avenue shall either be removed or replaced with downcast
lights.
5. Require that all parking lot lights be downcast.
6. Submit a photometric plan that meets ordinance requirements.
Seconded by Commissioner Ige Ayes – All
The motion passed.
This item will go to the city council on October 14, 2024
F. NEW BUSINESS
None
G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
H. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
None
I. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
None
J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None
K. ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Desai moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:20 p.m.
Seconded by Commissioner Ige Ayes – All
D1
Planning Commission Packet Page 10 of 40
September 17, 2024
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 9
The motion passed.
D1
Planning Commission Packet Page 11 of 40
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Planning Commission Packet Page 12 of 40
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date November 19, 2024
REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager
REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director
PRESENTER: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Amending Section 44-22 of the Maplewood City Code Related to
Reasonable Accommodations, Including Moving the Section to a New Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 1
Action Requested: Motion
Form of Action: Resolution ☐ Ordinance
☐Discussion Public Hearing
☐ Contract/Agreement ☐ Proclamation
Policy Issue:
The city adopted its reasonable accommodation ordinance in 2019 which created a process for
applicants to request a reasonable accommodation pursuant to Federal law. With more than five
years of this ordinance being in effect, staff is recommending amendments to the ordinance.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve an ordinance amending Section 44-22 of the Maplewood City Code related to
reasonable accommodations, including moving the section to a new Chapter 2, Article VI, Division
1.
Fiscal Impact:
Is There a Fiscal Impact? No ☐ Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0
Financing source(s): ☐ Adopted Budget ☐ Budget Modification ☐ New Revenue Source
☐Use of Reserves Other: N/A
Strategic Plan Relevance:
☐Community Inclusiveness ☐Financial & Asset Mgmt ☐Environmental Stewardship
☐Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness ☐Targeted Redevelopment
Staff periodically review key sections of city ordinances to ensure Maplewood’s regulations are
working effectively in their respective areas.
Background:
It is the policy of the city, pursuant to the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, to provide
reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities seeking fair and equal access to housing
in the application of its zoning and other regulations. Reasonable accommodation means providing
an individual with a disability, or developers of housing for an individual with a disability, flexibility in
the application of land use and zoning regulations or policies (including the modification or waiver of
certain requirements), when it is necessary to eliminate barriers to housing opportunities.
E1
Planning Commission Packet Page 13 of 40
Since the adoption of the reasonable accommodation ordinance in 2019, the city has received 12
applications. There are currently six approved reasonable accommodations within the city and each
was approved to allow more individuals to live within a housing unit than what the zoning ordinance
permits.
The amendments outlined below reflect staff’s review with the city attorney, addressing areas that
need further attention to continue processing these types of requests effectively.
Move Ordinance to Chapter 2 - Administration
The city attorney is recommending moving the reasonable accommodation process out of the
zoning ordinance to Chapter 2 - Administration. This change better represents how reasonable
accommodations function since they are not zoning decisions, necessarily, and can apply to other
city rules, regulations, and ordinance sections. The entire ordinance also adds the word “qualified”
to person in reference to those who may apply for the reasonable accommodation.
Add State Statute Citations
Adds two state statute citations that defines “sober home” and outlines the state’s requirements.
Add Escrow Requirement
Staff is recommending an escrow be required for reasonable accommodation applications. A flat
$50 application fee is required for all applications; however, some applications require extensive
legal review, and the escrow would work to help cover the city’s costs for processing the
applications. Staff is recommending a $1,000 escrow be added to the city’s fee schedule. This
escrow amount is consistent with what the city takes in for land use applications to assist in the
costs of engineering reviews.
Require Annual Confirmation
Reasonable accommodation approvals are given to the current user of the property and are not
transferable. However, unless the applicant notifies the city, the city is unaware of any changes with
the property or that the use has ceased. This proposed section requires the holder of an approved
reasonable accommodation to provide the city annually with an updated affirmation that the
reasonable accommodation is still necessary and that any conditions of the reasonable
accommodation are being adhered to.
Outline Process for Termination
The proposed amendment ordinance provides a process for terminating a previously approved
reasonable accommodation. Staff would make this determination but the applicant is provided with
the ability to appeal any decision to the city council for final review.
Seeking Feedback for Potential Future Amendment – Sober Homes Buffer Setback
City staff is seeking feedback on whether the city should consider a buffer setback requirement for
sober homes with an approved reasonable accommodation. The City of Saint Paul requires a 330-
foot buffer setback between sober homes. The City of Saint Paul conducted a study to determine
the appropriate buffer distance. Maplewood’s city attorney recommends the city conduct a similar
study to determine the appropriate buffer setback. Before resources are dedicated to such a study,
E1
Planning Commission Packet Page 14 of 40
city staff wanted to ensure a buffer setback would be supported. Currently the closest two sober
homes are 1,146 feet from each other. The next closest is just over a mile.
Attachments:
1.Ordinance Amending Section 44-22 of the Maplewood City Code Related to Reasonable
Accommodations, Including Moving the Section to a New Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 1
E1
Planning Commission Packet Page 15 of 40
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 44-22 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CITY RELATED TO
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS, INCLUDING MOVING THE SECTION TO A NEW
CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE VI, DIVISION 1
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 44-22 of the Maplewood City Code is hereby amended to add the underlined
language as follows:
Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 1Sec. 44-22. Reasonable accommodation.
(a)Policy and purpose. It is the policy of the city, pursuant to the Federal Fair Housing
Amendments Act of 1988, to provide reasonable accommodation in the application of its
zoning and other regulations for persons with disabilities seeking fair and equal access to
housing. Reasonable accommodation means providing an individual with a disability or
developers of housing for an individual with a disability flexibility in the application of land
use, zoning and other regulations or policies (including the modification or waiver of certain
requirements), when it is necessary to eliminate barriers to fair housing opportunities. The
purpose of this article is to establish a process for making and acting upon requests for
reasonable accommodation.
(b)Initiation of reasonable accommodation request. Any qualified person who requests
reasonable accommodation in the form of modification in the application of a zoning or
other regulation which may act as a barrier to fair housing opportunities due to the disability
of existing or proposed residents, may do so on an application form provided by the city
manager or such other person as the city manager may designate from time to time (the
"accommodation specialist"). "Qualified Person" includes any individual with a disability, his
or her representative or a developer or provider of housing for an individual with a
disability. The application shall include a detailed explanation of why the accommodation is
reasonably necessary to make the specific housing available to the qualified person(s),
including information establishing that the applicant is disabled under applicable laws, as
well as other information required by the accommodation specialist to make the
determination. If the project for which the request is being made also requires an additional
land use review or approval, the applicant shall file the request concurrently with the land
use review.
(c)Accommodation specialist determination; required findings. The accommodation specialist,
in consultation with the city attorney, shall have the authority to consider and act on
requests for reasonable accommodation. The accommodation specialist shall issue a
written decision in which the request is approved, approved subject to conditions, or
denied. In making the decision as to whether an accommodation is reasonable, the
following factors shall be considered:
(1)Special need created by the disability;
(2)Potential benefit that can be accomplished by the requested accommodation;
(3)Need for the requested accommodation, including alternatives that may provide an
equivalent level of benefit;
E1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 16 of 40
(4)Physical attributes of and any proposed changes to the subject property and
structures;
(5)Potential impact on surrounding uses;
(6)Whether the requested accommodation would constitute a fundamental alteration of
the zoning regulations, policies or procedures of the city, and/or nature of the area in
which the accommodation is being requested;
(7)Whether the requested accommodation would impose an undue financial or
administrative burden on the city; and
(8)Any other factor that may be determined to have a bearing on the request.
Any approval issued under this section may include such reasonable conditions that the
accommodation specialist deems necessary to mitigate any adverse impacts that the granting of
such reasonable accommodation may produce or amplify. For any reasonable accommodation
request granted for a sober home, as defined in Minnesota Statutes 254B.01. subd. 11, (“sober
home”) a condition of the limited license shall be compliance with the requirements of Minnesota
Statutes, section 254B.181.
If the qualified individual is a developer or provider of housing and is an organized business
entity, including for profit and non-profit businesses, the application shall include additional
disclosures as required by the accommodation specialist.
(d)Notice of decision. The written decision of the accommodation specialist shall be mailed to
the applicant within five business days of such decision being made. All written decisions
shall give notice of the right to appeal a decision of the accommodation specialist pursuant
to paragraph (kh) below. The decision of the accommodation specialist shall constitute the
final decision of the city, unless appealed according to the procedures and within the time
limits provided in paragraph (kh). Only the aggrieved applicant of the written reasonable
accommodation determination has a right to appeal the decision. A reasonable
accommodation approved under this section shall become effective on the first calendar
day following expiration of the right to appeal.
(e)Applicability. Any approved request shall constitute a limited license which shall allow the
property owner or occupant to continue to rely upon such accommodation only so long as
they own or occupy the property. Approval of a reasonable accommodation does not
constitute a property right, does not run with the land, and does not provide future owners
or occupants any rights to rely upon such accommodation approvals. Only the qualified
person who applied for such reasonable accommodation, and who is specifically named in
the city's approval of such accommodation, shall be entitled to the benefits and protections
thereof. .
(f)Conditions and guarantees. Prior to the issuance of any permits relative to an approved
reasonable accommodation request, the accommodation specialist may require the
applicant to record a covenant acknowledging and agreeing to comply with the terms and
conditions established in the determination.
(g)Fee. The city council shall annually set a fee in connection with a request for reasonable
accommodation made pursuant to the provisions of this article. Additional fees for any
other required permit or approval shall also be charged in accordance with the city's
general fee schedule.
(h)Escrow. If the qualified individual is an organized business entity, whether for profit or a
non-profit, and the business is a developer or provider of housing that is not licensed by the
E1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 17 of 40
State of Minnesota, the business will be required to pay the actual costs of review of the
application and will be required to place an amount as established in the city’s general fee
schedule, or an amount determined by the accommodation specialist based on the
estimated costs for reviewing the application, into an escrow account which the city can
draw down to cover the actual costs of review of the application. If the actual cost of
reviewing the application exceeds the amount established in the city’s general fee
schedule, then the city may charge the additional amount to the applicant. Payment of the
additional amount will be a condition of granting the requested accommodation. This
subsection is intended to conform to the city's practices in other development and housing
contexts.
(i)Annual confirmation. The holder of an approved reasonable accommodation limited license
hereunder shall, on or before January 1st of each year, provide the city with an updated
affirmation that the reasonable accommodation is still necessary and that any conditions of
the reasonable accommodation are being adhered to. In the event that the
accommodations specialist has reasonable cause to believe that the factors supporting the
original approval of a reasonable accommodation have changed, the accommodation
specialist may request additional information from the license holder. Failure to annually
reaffirm the need for the reasonable accommodation, or failure to provide information
reasonably requested by the accommodation specialist shall result in automatic termination
of the reasonable accommodation upon written notice by the accommodation specialist.
(j)Termination of Reasonable Accommodation. The accommodation specialist may terminate
a reasonable accommodation for any of the following reasons:
(1)the person to whom the reasonable accommodation is granted no longer owns or
occupies the property;
(2)the qualified person to whom the reasonable accommodation is granted fails to affirm
that the conditions of the reasonable accommodation are being adhered to and the
reasonable accommodation is still necessary;
(3)the accommodation specialist determines that the reasonable accommodation is no
longer necessary or reasonable, the conditions of the reasonable accommodation are
not being followed, or the factors considered under paragraph (c) have changed to an
extent that the property no longer meets the requirements of this chapter.
The accommodation specialist must provide written notice of termination specifying the
reason(s) for termination. Termination due to paragraph (i)(1) shall be effective as of the
date the person(s) to whom the accommodation is granted either no longer own or occupy
the property. Termination for any other reason shall be effective upon the written notice of
the accommodation specialist.
All written decisions shall give notice of the right to appeal a decision of the
accommodation specialist pursuant to paragraph (k) below. The decision of the
accommodation specialist shall constitute the final decision of the city, unless appealed
according to the procedures and within the time limits provided in paragraph (k). Only the
aggrieved applicant of the written reasonable accommodation determination has a right to
appeal the decision.
(kh) Appeals. Any decision reached by the accommodation specialist pursuant to paragraph (d)
or (i) above shall be subject to appeal to the city council by those persons with a right to
appeal as provided herein. All appeals shall be initiated by submitting a notice of appeal, in
writing, to the accommodation specialist within 30 days of the date upon which the decision
was made. Upon notice of appeal, the city manager shall present such appeal to the city
E1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 18 of 40
council for action within 30 days. The accommodation specialist shall also serve notice of
such appeal on all parties entitled to receive notice of a decision issued under paragraph
(d) above. Following a hearing on such appeal, the city council shall issue its findings, in
writing, within 30 days.
(l)Sober homes – Distance from other sober homes. To avoid the concentration of sober
homes in particular areas or neighborhoods in the City, any building containing one or
more sober homes must be located 330 feet from any other building containing a sober
home. The 330 feet shall be measured from the property line.
E1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 19 of 40
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Planning Commission Packet Page 20 of 40
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date November 19, 2024
REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager
REPORT FROM: Joe Rueb, Finance Director
PRESENTER: Joe Rueb, Finance Director
AGENDA ITEM: Capital Improvement Plan 2025-2029 Planning Commission
Action Requested: Motion Discussion ☐ Public Hearing
Form of Action: ☐Resolution ☐ Ordinance ☐Contract/Agreement ☐ Proclamation
Policy Issue:
The Capital Improvement Plan coordinates the planning, financing and timing of major equipment
purchases and construction projects. By law, the Planning Commission must review the CIP. The
City Council will consider the adoption of the CIP along with the 2025 budget in December. The role
of the Planning Commission is to ensure that the projects included within the plan are in alignment
with the Comprehensive Plan and other planning processes.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve the draft 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan.
Fiscal Impact:
Is There a Fiscal Impact? ☐ No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $60,473,000
Financing source(s): Adopted Budget ☐ Budget Modification ☐ New Revenue Source
☐Use of Reserves ☐ Other: N/A
Strategic Plan Relevance:
Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship
Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment
Background:
The City Council will hold a public hearing prior to adoption of the plan. The CIP will be available on
the City’s webpage.
Attachments:
1. PowerPoint
2.List of CIP Projects by Department
3.List of CIP Projects by Funding Source
F1
Planning Commission Packet Page 21 of 40
PPlanningg CommissionNovemberr 19,, 2024Capital Improvement Plan Discussion2025-2029F1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 22 of 40
CCapitall Improvementt Plann Discussionn ObjectivesEnsuree projectss aree inn alignmentt withh comprehensivee plann andd otherr planningg processes.. F1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 23 of 40
CCapital Improvement Plan ProcessCapital Needs IdentificationLong Range Strategic PlanFunding Sources IdentifiedFive-Year CIP PlanAnnual Capital BudgetCIP ImplementationF1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 24 of 40
CCapitall Improvementt Plann FinancingVehicles and EquipmentPay-as-you-go (PAYG)Tax exempt leaseBuilding ImprovementsBuilding FundsDebtStreets and InfrastructureDebtFranchise FeesLocal Government AidMunicipal State AidPark ImprovementsPark Dedication FeesDebtRedevelopmentTax Increment FinancingF1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 25 of 40
CCapitall Improvementt Plann Guidingg Principles•Councill Priorities•Debtt Reduction•Streett Improvements•Leveragee Locall Governmentt Aidd (LGA)•Pay-As-You-Go•Sustainability•Economicc Development•BalanceF1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 26 of 40
22025--20299 Capitall Improvementt Plann TimelineAugust 12, 2024Budget/CIP Discussion #1August 26, 2024Budget/CIP Discussion #2November 19, 2024Planning Commission MeetingNovember 20, 2024Parks & Recreation Commission MeetingDecember 9, 2024Adopt 2025 BudgetAdopt 2025-2029 CIPF1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 27 of 40
PPurposee off thee Capitall Improvementt Plan•Capitall Improvementt Planningg Documentt forr 55 Years•Doess nott authorizee expenditures•Councill mustt authorizee eachh itemm priorr too spending•Adoptionn Requiredd too Issuee Debtt too Financee thee Projects,, § M.S.. 475.521F1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 28 of 40
22025–2029 Capital Improvement PlanSummary of CIP Projects by CategoryCategory FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 TotalBuilding615,000 250,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 1,715,000 Equipment 2,065,840 1,247,790 2,766,756 1,583,922 1,699,558 9,363,866 Parks2,050,000 610,000 275,000 325,000 175,000 3,435,000 Redevelopment 100,000 1,100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1,500,000 Street10,862,134 11,647,000 9,460,000 4,970,000 7,520,000 44,459,134 TOTAL $15,692,974 $14,854,790 $12,851,756 $7,278,922 $9,794,558 $60,473,000
F1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 29 of 40
22025-20299 Streett CIPP Plans•Proposedd CIPP Miless forr 2025-2029•14.788 Miless off Proposedd Streett Construction•10.95%% off Cityy Streets•Spott Paving•Temporaryy Fixx Untill aa CIPP Projectt iss Implemented•Providee Relieff andd Increasedd Levell off Service•Addd Annuall Spott Pavingg too Pavementt ManagementtPractices•Recommendd $80,000/yearr fromm thee SRFF FundF1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 30 of 40
220255 Streett CIPP Projects•Areaa A::•Southh Legg Areaa Streets•2.855 Miless•Averagee PCI:: 43/100•Areaa B::•Prosperityy Roadd andd Hazelwoodd Street•1.277 Miless•Averagee PCI:: 38/100Totall Costt forr 20255 Streett Improvementss == $9,040,000Totall Miless off 20255 Streett Improvementss == 4.122 F1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 31 of 40
OOtherr Majorr Projectss 2025-2029•Gladstonee Redevelopment•Housingg Replacementt Program•Ramseyy Countyy Ricee Streett Improvements•Ramseyy Countyy Larpenteurr Avenuee Improvements•Ramseyy Countyy Beamm Avenuee Pavementt Preservation•Parkk Upgradess•Naturee Centerr Improvements•Facilityy Upgrades•Liftt Stationn Upgrades•Whitee Bearr Ave/Larpenteurr (Ramseyy County)F1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 32 of 40
PPlanningg CCommissionn CConsiderations•DDoo thee Projectss Conformm withh theeComprehensivee Plann andd otherr PlanninggProcesses?•Motionn too approvee thee draftt 2025-20299 CIPF1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 33 of 40
QQuestions?F1, Attachment 1
Planning Commission Packet Page 34 of 40
Department Request Title FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total
Community Development Gladstone Redevelopment $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00
Housing Replacement Program $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $500,000.00
Total Community Development $100,000.00 $1,100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $1,500,000.00
Fire Police & Fire 800 MHz Radios Replacement $120,840.00 $128,090.00 $135,756.00 $143,922.00 $152,558.00 $681,166.00
Automated CPR Device Replacement $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Firefighter Turnout Gear Replacement $276,000.00 $276,000.00
Fire Squad Replacements $65,000.00 $68,000.00 $71,000.00 $74,000.00 $77,000.00 $355,000.00
Fire Engine Replacement $1,475,000.00 $1,475,000.00
Ambulance Replacement $340,000.00 $370,000.00 $710,000.00
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) replacement
Ambulance Stretcher-Powerload Replacement
Cardiac Monitor Replacement
Total Fire $525,840.00 $196,090.00 $1,831,756.00 $493,922.00 $599,558.00 $3,647,166.00
Parks and Recreation Solar Panels and Electric Vehicle Charging Station for Wakefield Building $100,000.00 $100,000.00
Hazelwood Park $550,000.00 $550,000.00
Picnic Shelters in Maplewood Area Neighborhoods $250,000.00 $150,000.00 $400,000.00
Maplewood Nature Center Improvements $300,000.00 $300,000.00
Park Maintenance & Reinvestment $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00
Open Space Improvements $25,000.00 $50,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $150,000.00
Park Upgrades to Existing Parks $150,000.00 $200,000.00 $250,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $900,000.00
Lake Links Trail Boardwalk $215,000.00 $215,000.00
Total Parks and Recreation $2,340,000.00 $500,000.00 $275,000.00 $325,000.00 $175,000.00 $3,615,000.00
Police Emergency Response Vehicle Purchase $345,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $345,000.00
Squad Replacement $375,000.00 $375,000.00 $375,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $1,925,000.00
Total Police $720,000.00 $375,000.00 $375,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $2,270,000.00
Public Works Ramsey County - White Bear/Gervais Traffic Signal Replacement $200,000.00 $200,000.00
Unit 727 Skid Steer $60,000.00 $60,000.00
Municipal Facility ADA Upgrades $65,000.00 $65,000.00
Municipal Facility Upgrades $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $1,350,000.00
Ramsey County Larpenteur Avenue Improvement Project $350,000.00 $350,000.00
Ramsey County Beam Avenue Pavement Preservation Project $450,000.00 $450,000.00
2029 Maplewood Street Improvements $7,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00
Unit 615 Jet Truck $340,000.00 $340,000.00
Unit 616 Jet/Vac Truck $600,000.00 $600,000.00
Unit 540 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
2028 Maplewood Street Improvements $4,970,000.00 $4,970,000.00
Gold Line Pedestrian Improvements $241,134.00 $241,134.00
2027 Maplewood Street Improvements $9,110,000.00 $9,110,000.00
Unit 620 Emergency Sewer Pump $70,000.00 $70,000.00
Unit 511 SUV $40,000.00 $40,000.00 F1, Attachment 2Planning Commission Packet Page 35 of 40
Unit 516 One Half Ton Truck $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 645 Half Ton Truck $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 541 One and One-Half Ton Dump Truck $110,000.00 $110,000.00
Unit 732 and Unit 737: Two Toolcat Work Machines $140,000.00 $140,000.00
Unit 650 One and One-Half Ton Dump Truck $110,000.00 $110,000.00
County Road B/I-35E Storm Water Improvements $175,000.00 $175,000.00
Unit 643 One and One-half Ton Dump Truck $110,000.00 $110,000.00
Unit 714 Street Sweeper $240,000.00 $240,000.00
2025 Maplewood Street Improvements $9,040,000.00 $9,040,000.00
White Bear Ave/Larpenteur Ave Street Improvements $956,000.00 $956,000.00
County Road D Street Improvements $170,000.00 $170,000.00
McKnight/Stillwater Traffic Signal Replacement $157,000.00 $157,000.00
2026 Maplewood Street Improvements $11,120,000.00 $11,120,000.00
Ramsey County Rice Street Improvements $520,000.00 $520,000.00
Unit 611 and Unit 531: Two 1/2 Ton Trucks $56,700.00 $56,700.00
Unit 654: Park Maintenance Machine $70,000.00 $70,000.00
Unit 653 and Unit 545: Two Park Maintenance Machines $140,000.00 $140,000.00
Unit 621 Half-Ton Truck $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 623 CCTV Truck $300,000.00 $300,000.00
Unit 717 Front End Loader $300,000.00 $300,000.00
Unit 658 Park Maintenance Machine $140,000.00 $140,000.00
Unit 642 Three-Quarter Ton Van $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 512 Half-Ton Truck $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Pond Cleaning/Dredging Projects $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $220,000.00
Lift Station Upgrade Program $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $100,000.00
Unit 617 Emergency Generator Replacement $120,000.00 $120,000.00
Unit 539 Single Axle Plow Truck $0.00 $0.00
Total Public Works $12,007,134.00 $12,683,700.00 $10,270,000.00 $5,960,000.00 $8,520,000.00 $49,440,834.00
Total Departments $15,692,974.00 $14,854,790.00 $12,851,756.00 $7,278,922.00 $9,794,558.00 $60,473,000.00
F1, Attachment 2Planning Commission Packet Page 36 of 40
Funding Source Request Title FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Total
Ambulance Fund Automated CPR Device Replacement $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Ambulance Replacement $340,000.00 $370,000.00 $710,000.00
Total Ambulance Fund $340,000.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 $0.00 $370,000.00 $860,000.00
Building Fund Municipal Facility ADA Upgrades $65,000.00 $65,000.00
Municipal Facility Upgrades $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $1,350,000.00
Total Building Fund $315,000.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $1,415,000.00
Capital Improvement Fund Police & Fire 800 MHz Radios Replacement $120,840.00 $128,090.00 $135,756.00 $143,922.00 $152,558.00 $681,166.00
Solar Panels and Electric Vehicle Charging Station for Wakefield Building $50,000.00 $50,000.00
Park Upgrades to Existing Parks $150,000.00 $200,000.00 $250,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $900,000.00
Total Capital Improvement Fund $320,840.00 $328,090.00 $385,756.00 $293,922.00 $302,558.00 $1,631,166.00
City of St. Paul 2029 Maplewood Street Improvements $744,400.00 $744,400.00
2027 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,165,000.00 $1,165,000.00
Total City of St. Paul $0.00 $0.00 $1,165,000.00 $0.00 $744,400.00 $1,909,400.00
EDA Fund Housing Replacement Program $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $500,000.00
Total EDA Fund $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $500,000.00
Environmental Utility Fund Solar Panels and Electric Vehicle Charging Station for Wakefield Building $50,000.00 $50,000.00
2029 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,433,000.00 $1,433,000.00
2028 Maplewood Street Improvements $560,000.00 $560,000.00
2027 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,796,900.00 $1,796,900.00
County Road B/I-35E Storm Water Improvements $175,000.00 $175,000.00
2025 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,463,000.00 $1,463,000.00
2026 Maplewood Street Improvements $2,089,000.00 $2,089,000.00
Pond Cleaning/Dredging Projects $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $220,000.00
Total Environmental Utility Fund $1,798,000.00 $2,199,000.00 $1,796,900.00 $560,000.00 $1,433,000.00 $7,786,900.00
Fleet Fund Unit 727 Skid Steer $60,000.00 $60,000.00
Unit 615 Jet Truck $340,000.00 $340,000.00
Unit 616 Jet/Vac Truck $600,000.00 $600,000.00
Unit 540 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
Unit 620 Emergency Sewer Pump $70,000.00 $70,000.00
Unit 511 SUV $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 516 One Half Ton Truck $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 645 Half Ton Truck $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 541 One and One-Half Ton Dump Truck $110,000.00 $110,000.00
Unit 732 and Unit 737: Two Toolcat Work Machines $140,000.00 $140,000.00
Unit 650 One and One-Half Ton Dump Truck $110,000.00 $110,000.00
Unit 643 One and One-half Ton Dump Truck $110,000.00 $110,000.00
Unit 714 Street Sweeper $240,000.00 $240,000.00
Unit 611 and Unit 531: Two 1/2 Ton Trucks $56,700.00 $56,700.00
Unit 654: Park Maintenance Machine $70,000.00 $70,000.00 F1, Attachment 3Planning Commission Packet Page 37 of 40
Unit 653 and Unit 545: Two Park Maintenance Machines $140,000.00 $140,000.00
Unit 621 Half-Ton Truck $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 623 CCTV Truck $300,000.00 $300,000.00
Unit 717 Front End Loader $300,000.00 $300,000.00
Unit 658 Park Maintenance Machine $140,000.00 $140,000.00
Unit 642 Three-Quarter Ton Van $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 512 Half-Ton Truck $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Unit 617 Emergency Generator Replacement $120,000.00 $120,000.00
Total Fleet Fund $700,000.00 $656,700.00 $540,000.00 $670,000.00 $680,000.00 $3,246,700.00
G.O. Bonds Improvement 2029 Maplewood Street Improvements $2,193,880.00 $2,193,880.00
2028 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,777,300.00 $1,777,300.00
2027 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,952,400.00 $1,952,400.00
2025 Maplewood Street Improvements $2,532,760.00 $2,532,760.00
2026 Maplewood Street Improvements $4,738,400.00 $4,738,400.00
Total G.O. Bonds Improvement $2,532,760.00 $4,738,400.00 $1,952,400.00 $1,777,300.00 $2,193,880.00 $13,194,740.00
G.O. Bonds Tax Abatement Park Maintenance & Reinvestment $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00
Total G.O. Bonds Tax Abatement $1,000,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000,000.00
G.O. Bonds Tax Increment Gladstone Redevelopment $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00
Total G.O. Bonds Tax Increment $0.00 $1,000,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000,000.00
Municipal State Aid White Bear Ave/Larpenteur Ave Street Improvements $956,000.00 $956,000.00
County Road D Street Improvements $170,000.00 $170,000.00
Ramsey County Rice Street Improvements $520,000.00 $520,000.00
Total Municipal State Aid $956,000.00 $170,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $520,000.00 $1,646,000.00
Park Improvement Fund Hazelwood Park $550,000.00 $550,000.00
Picnic Shelters in Maplewood Area Neighborhoods $250,000.00 $150,000.00 $400,000.00
Maplewood Nature Center Improvements $300,000.00 $300,000.00
Open Space Improvements $25,000.00 $50,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $150,000.00
Lake Links Trail Boardwalk $215,000.00 $215,000.00
Fish Creek Open Space $0.00 $0.00
Total Park Improvement Fund $1,090,000.00 $300,000.00 $25,000.00 $175,000.00 $25,000.00 $1,615,000.00
Public Safety Aid Squad Replacement $375,000.00 $375,000.00
Total Public Safety Aid $375,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $375,000.00
Public Safety Equipment Fund Emergency Response Vehicle Purchase $345,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $345,000.00
Firefighter Turnout Gear Replacement $276,000.00 $276,000.00
Fire Squad Replacements $65,000.00 $68,000.00 $71,000.00 $74,000.00 $77,000.00 $355,000.00
Squad Replacement $0.00 $375,000.00 $375,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $1,550,000.00
Fire Engine Replacement $1,475,000.00 $1,475,000.00
Total Public Safety Equipment Fund $410,000.00 $443,000.00 $1,921,000.00 $750,000.00 $477,000.00 $4,001,000.00 F1, Attachment 3Planning Commission Packet Page 38 of 40
SRF Special Assessment 2029 Maplewood Street Improvements $957,720.00 $957,720.00
2028 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,045,468.00 $1,045,468.00
2027 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,139,031.00 $1,139,031.00
2025 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,322,801.00 $1,322,801.00
2026 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,832,250.00 $1,832,250.00
Total SRF Special Assessment $1,322,801.00 $1,832,250.00 $1,139,031.00 $1,045,468.00 $957,720.00 $6,297,270.00
Sanitary Sewer Fund 2029 Maplewood Street Improvements $580,000.00 $580,000.00
2028 Maplewood Street Improvements $315,000.00 $315,000.00
2027 Maplewood Street Improvements $847,000.00 $847,000.00
2025 Maplewood Street Improvements $618,000.00 $618,000.00
2026 Maplewood Street Improvements $808,000.00 $808,000.00
Lift Station Upgrade Program $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $100,000.00
Total Sanitary Sewer Fund $638,000.00 $828,000.00 $867,000.00 $335,000.00 $600,000.00 $3,268,000.00
St. Paul Regional Water 2028 Maplewood Street Improvements $271,200.00 $271,200.00
2027 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,000,800.00 $1,000,800.00
2025 Maplewood Street Improvements $648,000.00 $648,000.00
2026 Maplewood Street Improvements $254,700.00 $254,700.00
Total St. Paul Regional Water $648,000.00 $254,700.00 $1,000,800.00 $271,200.00 $0.00 $2,174,700.00
Street Light Fund Ramsey County - White Bear/Gervais Traffic Signal Replacement $200,000.00 $200,000.00
Ramsey County Beam Avenue Pavement Preservation Project $450,000.00 $450,000.00
McKnight/Stillwater Traffic Signal Replacement $157,000.00 $157,000.00
Total Street Light Fund $450,000.00 $357,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $807,000.00
Street Revitalization Fund Ramsey County Larpenteur Avenue Improvement Project $350,000.00 $350,000.00
2029 Maplewood Street Improvements $750,000.00 $750,000.00
2028 Maplewood Street Improvements $820,032.00 $820,032.00
Gold Line Pedestrian Improvements $241,134.00 $241,134.00
2027 Maplewood Street Improvements $774,269.00 $774,269.00
2025 Maplewood Street Improvements $2,101,639.00 $2,101,639.00
2026 Maplewood Street Improvements $1,070,850.00 $1,070,850.00
Total Street Revitalization Fund $2,342,773.00 $1,070,850.00 $1,124,269.00 $820,032.00 $750,000.00 $6,107,924.00
Water Area Fund 2029 Maplewood Street Improvements $341,000.00 $341,000.00
2028 Maplewood Street Improvements $181,000.00 $181,000.00
2027 Maplewood Street Improvements $434,600.00 $434,600.00
2025 Maplewood Street Improvements $353,800.00 $353,800.00
2026 Maplewood Street Improvements $326,800.00 $326,800.00
Total Water Area Fund $353,800.00 $326,800.00 $434,600.00 $181,000.00 $341,000.00 $1,637,200.00
Total Funding Sources $15,692,974.00 $14,854,790.00 $12,851,756.00 $7,278,922.00 $9,794,558.00 $60,473,000.00 F1, Attachment 3Planning Commission Packet Page 39 of 40
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Planning Commission Packet Page 40 of 40