Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2024-08-12 City Council Meeting Packet
AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, August 12, 2024 City Hall, Council Chambers Meeting No. 15-24 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 22, 2024 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes 2. July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Administrative Presentations a. Council Calendar Update 2. Council Presentations 3. Parks & Recreation Commission Annual Report 4. Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Annual Report 5. Metro Transit Purple Line Project Update G. CONSENT AGENDA – Items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and non- controversial and are approved by one motion of the council. If a councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment regarding an item, the vote should be held until the questions or comments are made then the single vote should be taken. If a councilmember objects to an item it should be removed and acted upon as a separate item. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Resolution Identifying the Need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account Funding and Authorizing Application for Grant Funds, JB Vang’s Gladstone Village II, 1880 English Street North 3. Resolution Supporting Application for a Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Redevelopment Grant, 1375 Frost Avenue East 4. Local Lawful Gambling Permit for the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 1725 Kennard Street, October 12, 2024 5. Local Lawful Gambling Permit for the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 1725 Kennard Street, November 23, 2024 6. Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for DRAAZ Liquor Corporation, dba Rice Street Liquors, 1700 Rice Street Unit P 7. Resolution for a Lawful Gambling Premises Permit for White Bear Lake Area Hockey Association at Johnny Kitchen & Bar Inc., 1900 County Road D E #135 8. Purchase of Emergency Response Vehicle 9. Info-Tech Membership Agreement 10. Payment for Tyler Enterprise ERP 11. Resolution Ordering the Preparation of Feasibility Study, 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12 H. PUBLIC HEARINGS – If you are here for a Public Hearing please familiarize yourself with the Rules of Civility printed on the back of the agenda. Sign in with the City Clerk before addressing the council. At the podium please state your name and address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. The Mayor will then direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments. 1. Gladstone Village II, 1880 English Street North a. Public Hearing b. Public Vacation of an Easement Resolution (4 Votes) c. Conditional Use Permit Resolution d. Design Review Resolution I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Hampton Companies, 2694 Maplewood Drive North a. Conditional Use Permit Resolution b. Design Review Resolution 2. City Council Budget and CIP Discussion #1 K. AWARD OF BIDS None L. ADJOURNMENT Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk’s Office at 651.249.2000 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. RULES OF CIVILITY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OUR COMMUNITY Following are rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Speak only for yourself, not for other council members or citizens - unless specifically tasked by your colleagues to speak for the group or for citizens in the form of a petition. Show respect during comments and/or discussions, listen actively and do not interrupt or talk amongst each other. Be respectful of the process, keeping order and decorum. Do not be critical of council members, staff or others in public. Be respectful of each other’s time keeping remarks brief, to the point and non-repetitive. E1 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL MANAGER WORKSHOP 5:30 P.M. Monday, July22, 2024 City Hall, Council Chambers A.CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was heldin the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order at5:30 p.m.by Mayor Abrams. B.ROLL CALL Marylee Abrams, MayorPresent Rebecca Cave, CouncilmemberPresent Kathleen Juenemann, CouncilmemberPresent Chonburi Lee, CouncilmemberPresent Nikki Villavicencio, CouncilmemberPresent C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA CouncilmemberCavemoved toapprove the agenda as submitted. Seconded by CouncilmemberLee Ayes– All The motion passed. D.UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1.Metro Transit Purple Line Project Update Public Works Director Love introduced the item. Craig Lamothe, Purple Line Project Manager, Stephen Smith, Deputy Project Manager, and Sara Pflaum, Engineering & Design Manger, gave the presentation and answered questions from council. No Action Required. E.NEW BUSINESS None D.ADJOURNMENT Mayor Abramsadjourned the meetingat7:01p.m. July22, 2024 Council Manager Workshop Minutes 1 Council Packet Page Number 1 of 297 E2 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Tuesday, July 22, 2024 City Hall, Council Chambers Meeting No. 14-24 A.CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambersand was called to order at7:11byMayor Abrams. Mayor Abrams gave an update on the Purple Line discussion that took place at the Workshop meeting and stated there would be another presentation at a future council meeting. B.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C.ROLL CALL Marylee Abrams, MayorPresent Rebecca Cave, CouncilmemberPresent Kathleen Juenemann, CouncilmemberPresent Chonburi Lee, CouncilmemberPresent Nikki Villavicencio, CouncilmemberPresent D.APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Abrams added a Resolution to agenda item H1. The following items were added to Council Presentations: Philippine Center National Night Out Parks Tour CouncilmemberLeemoved to approve the agenda as amended. Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann Ayes – All The motion passed. E.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.July 08, 2024 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve the July 08, 2024 City Council Workshop MeetingMinutes assubmitted. July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 1 Council Packet Page Number 2 of 297 E2 Seconded by CouncilmemberVillavicencioAyes – All The motion passed. 2.July08, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes CouncilmemberCavemoved to approve the July 08, 2024 City Council MeetingMinutes assubmitted. Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemannAyes – All The motion passed. F.APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS 1.Administrative Presentations a.Council Calendar Update City ManagerSablegave an update to the council calendar and reviewed other topics of concern or interest requested by councilmembers. 2.Council Presentations Philippine Center Councilmember Villavicencio attended Philippine Day of Minnesota and announced the Philippine Center in Maplewood will have an open house on September 14, from 12-4pm and invited residents to attend. Mayor Abrams added that ISD 622 willbe bringing 10 Philippine teachers to teach in the district. National Night Out Councilmember Juenemann reminded residents that National Night Out is Tuesday, th August 6and encouraged residents to participate. Parks Tour Councilmember Juenemann gave a recap of the Parks Tour and commented on the use and importance of parks. 3.2023 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report Finance Director Rueb introduced the item. Andrew Grice, Auditor with berganKDV gave the presentation. CouncilmemberLeemoved to accept the Maplewood 2023 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann Ayes – All July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 2 Council Packet Page Number 3 of 297 E2 The motion passed. G.CONSENT AGENDA – Items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and non- controversial and are approved by one motion of the council. If a councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment regarding an item, the vote should be held until the questions or comments are made then the single vote should be taken. If a councilmember objects to an item it should be removed and acted upon as a separate item. CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved toapprove agenda items G1-G6. Seconded by CouncilmemberCave Ayes – All The motion passed. 1.Approval of Claims CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve the approval of claims. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 109,289.23 Checks # 121341 thru # 121366 dated 07/09/24 $ 124,120.82 Checks # 121367 thru # 121410 dated 07/16/24 $ 463,249.05 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 07/01/24 thru 07/14/24 $ 696,659.10 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $ 761,997.37 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 07/05/24 $ 761,997.37 Total Payroll $ 1,458,656.47 GRAND TOTAL Seconded by Councilmember CaveAyes – All The motion passed. 2.Call for Special Meeting to Canvass 2024 Primary Election Results July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 3 Council Packet Page Number 4 of 297 E2 CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to call a special meeting of the city council for Friday, August 16, 2024 at 4:00 p.m. in the council chambers for the purpose of canvassing the August 13, 2024 Primary Election results. Seconded by CouncilmemberCaveAyes – All The motion passed. 3.Public Safety Aid Funds Transfer CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve a transfer of $72,317.67 of Public Safety Aid funds from the General Fund to the Public Safety CIP Fund (406) to cover the purchase of the Fotokite Camera. Seconded by CouncilmemberCaveAyes – All The motion passed. 4.Resolution Supporting Application for a Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Contamination Cleanup Grant, 1375 Frost Avenue East CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved toapprove aresolution of support for a grant application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development’s Contamination Cleanup fund. Resolution 24-07-2332 RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR MINNESOTA’S DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT’S CONTAMINATION CLEANUP FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR BEACON’S PROJECT AT 1375 FROST AVENUE EAST BE IT RESOLVED that the city of Maplewood has approved the Contamination Cleanup grant application submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) no later than August 1, 2024, by the City of Maplewood for the 1375 Frost Avenue East site. BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED that the city of Maplewood is located within the seven-county metropolitan area defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2, and is participating in the local housing incentives program under section 473.254. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood act as the legal sponsor for the project contained in the Contamination Cleanup Grant Program to be submitted no later than August 1, 2024, and that the Assistant Community Development Director is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project. July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 4 Council Packet Page Number 5 of 297 E2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are committed to the project identified. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state the City of Maplewood may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above-referenced project, and that the City of Maplewood certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes – All The motion passed. 5.Memorandum of Agreement with Minnesota North College for Clinical Internships with the City of Maplewood CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve the Memorandum of Agreement between Minnesota North College and the City of Maplewood. Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes – All The motion passed. 6.Contract Modification Number 01 with Leo A. Daly Architect for the East Metro Public Safety Training Facility CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve Contract Modification Number 01 with Leo A. Daly Architect for a Space Needs Assessment, Feasibility andDesign for the East Metro Public Safety Training Facility. Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes – All The motion passed. H.PUBLIC HEARINGS – If you are here for a Public Hearing please familiarize yourself with the Rules of Civility printed on the back of the agenda. Sign in with the City Clerk before addressing the council. At the podium please state your name and address July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 5 Council Packet Page Number 6 of 297 E2 clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. The Mayor will then direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments. 1.Hill-Murray Project Public Hearing Finance Director Rueb gave the staff report. Sofie Lykke, with Kennedy & Graven, provided further information. Mayor Abrams opened public hearing. The following people spoke: None Mayor Abrams closed the public hearing. CouncilmemberJuenemann moved to approve the Resolution Authorizing the Issuance, Sale, and Delivery of an Educational Facilities Revenue Note (Hill-Murray School Project) and Approving the Forms of and Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of the Note and Related Documents. Resolution 24-07-2333 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE, AND DELIVERY OF AN EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES REVENUE NOTE (HILL-MURRAY SCHOOL PROJECT) AND APPROVING THE FORMS OF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THE NOTE AND RELATED DOCUMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the “City”) is a statutory city, municipal corporation, and political subdivision duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1655, as amended (the “Act”), the City is authorized to issue revenue obligations to finance, in whole or in part, the cost of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, betterment, or extension of a “project,” defined in the Act, in part, as any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise, or any combination of two or more such enterprises engaged in any business, which includes an educational facility and an expansion thereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City has received a request from The Hill- Murray Foundation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the “Borrower”), that the City issue its Educational Facilities Revenue Note (Hill-Murray School Project), Series 2024 (the “Note”), in an original principal amount not to exceed $4,000,000, and loan the proceeds derived from the sale of the Note to the Borrower (the “Loan”) pursuant to a Loan Agreement, to be dated on or after August 1, 2024 (the “Loan Agreement”), between the City and the Borrower, to: (i) finance the renovation and construction of the nonsectarian portions of an educational facility located at 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East in the City, known as Hill-Murray School, including a new plaza entrance to the school’s athletic field and running track and a new entrance to the student union (the “Capital Project”); (ii) fund a debt service reserve fund, if necessary; (iii) pay a portion of the interest on the Note, if necessary; and (iv) pay the costs of issuing the Note (collectively, the Capital Project and July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 6 Council Packet Page Number 7 of 297 E2 the other purposes to which proceeds of the Note are proposed to be applied are the “Project”); and WHEREAS, Premier Bank, a Minnesota corporation (the “Lender”), has agreed to purchase the Note in a manner consistent with the policies of the City relating to the issuance and sale of non-rated conduit revenue bonds; and WHEREAS, the loan repayments required to be made by the Borrower under the terms of the Loan Agreement will be assigned to the Lender under the terms of a Pledge Agreement, to be dated on or after August 1, 2024 (the “Pledge”), between the City, the Borrower, and the Lender; and WHEREAS, the obligations of the Borrower under the terms of the Loan Agreement and the Pledge will be secured by an Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Fixture Financing Statement, to be dated on or after August 1, 2024 (the “Mortgage”), from the Borrower in favor of the Lender; and WHEREAS, forms of the following documents have been submitted to the City and are now on file with the City: (i) a form of the Note; (ii) the Loan Agreement; (iii) the Pledge; and (iv) the Mortgage; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Note may not be issued as a tax-exempt bond unless the City Council of the City approves the Note after conducting a public hearing thereon, and Section 469.154, subdivision 4 of the Act requires that prior to submitting an application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (“DEED”) for approval of theProject, the City Council of the City must conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake a project authorized to be financed under the terms of the Act; and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing (the “Public Notice”) was published in the Pioneer Press, the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation in the City, with respect to (i) the required public hearing to be held by the City under Section147(f) of the Code; (ii) the required public hearing under Section 469.154, subdivision 4 of the Act; and (iii) the approval of the issuance of the Note. The Public Notice was published at least 14 days prior to the date of the public hearing. On the date hereof, the City Council of the City conducted a public hearing at which a reasonable opportunity was provide for interested individuals to express their views, both orally and in writing, with respect to the proposed issuance of the Note and the location and nature of the Project. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cityof Maplewood, Minnesota as follows: f the Note. Section 1.Issuance o 1.01Findings. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that: (a)The issuance and sale of the Note, the execution and delivery by the City of the Note, the Loan Agreement, and the Pledge, and the performance of July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 7 Council Packet Page Number 8 of 297 E2 all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Loan Agreement and the Pledge are undertaken pursuant to the Act. (b)The renovation and construction of the Capital Project and the other costs of the Project to be financed by the Note furthers the economic development purposes stated in Section469.152 of the Act and constitutes a revenue producing “project,” as defined in Section469.153, subdivision 2(b) of the Act. (c) In accordance with Section 469.154, subdivision 7, of the Act, the officers, employees, and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to encourage the Borrower to target employment opportunities to qualified individuals who are unemployed or economically disadvantaged. Such individuals may be identified by such mechanisms as are available to the Borrower, such as a first source agreement in which the Borrower agrees to use a designated state employment office as a first source for employment recruitment, referral, and placement. (d) The loan repayments to be made by the Borrower under the Loan Agreement are fixed to produce revenues sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note issued under this resolution when due,and the Loan Agreement also provides that the Borrower is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the school facility, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all lawfully imposed taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the school facility and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement. (e)As provided in the Loan Agreement, the Note shall not be payable from nor charged upon any funds other than the revenues pledged to its payment, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph. No holder of the Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay the Note or the interest or premium thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement and the revenues and assets thereunder (except for certain unassigned rights of the City, including those related to indemnification and reimbursement for certain costs and expenses), which will be assigned to the Lender under the Pledge. The Note shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement, and the revenues and assets thereunder (except for the unassigned rights of the City referenced above), which will be assigned to the Lender under the Pledge. The Note shall recite that the Note is issued pursuant to the Act, and that the Note, including interest and premium, if any, thereon, is payable solely from the revenues and assets pledged to the payment thereof, and the Note shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 8 Council Packet Page Number 9 of 297 E2 statutory limitations. 1.02.Issuance and Sale of the Note. The City hereby authorizes the issuance of the Note in the principal amount not to exceed $4,000,000 to finance the Project. The City hereby further authorizes the issuance of the Note, in the form, and with the terms set forth in the form of the Note now on file with the City. The aggregate principal amount of the Note (subject to the limitations set forth in this Section 1.02), the interest rate of the Note, the terms for adjustment of the interest rate on the Note, the date of the documents referenced in this resolution and the Note, and the terms of redemption of the Note may be established or modified with the approval of the City. The execution and delivery of the Note shall be conclusive evidence that the City has approved such terms as subsequently established or modified. The offer of the Lender to purchase the Note at the price of par plus accrued interest, if any, to the date of delivery at the interest rate or rates specified in the Note is hereby accepted. Upon approval of the Project by DEED, the Mayor and the City Manager of the City (the “City Officials”) are authorized and directed to prepareand execute the Note as prescribed in the Loan Agreement and the Note shall be delivered to the Lender. The City Officials are hereby authorized to execute and deliver any agreements with any depository institution, including any representation letter oramendment to any existing representation letter, in the event the City and the Lender elect to register the Note in book-entry form. 1.03.Special, Limited Obligations of City. The Note shall be a special, limited obligation of the City, and the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note shall be payable solely from the proceeds of the Note, the revenues derived from the Borrower pursuant to the Loan Agreement, and the security provided by the Borrower in accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Mortgage, the Pledge, and any and all other security of any kind or nature provided by the Borrower to the Lender. The Note will be subject to the provisions of a tax certificate, to be dated the date of issuance of the Note (the “Tax Certificate”), by the Borrower, and endorsed by the City. 1.04.Approval of Documents. The City Officials are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Loan Agreement, the Note, the Pledge, and such other documents as bond counsel considers appropriate in connection with the issuance of the Note (collectively, the “City Documents”). The forms of the City Documents and all other documents listed in the recitals hereof and exhibits thereto, and any consents and such other documents as are necessary or appropriate in connection with the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Note, including without limitation various certificates of the City, a certificate as to arbitrage and rebate, and similar documents (collectively, the “Financing Documents”) are approved substantially in the forms on file with the City Manager. The City Documents, in substantially the forms submitted, are directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the City Officials. The Note is to be executed in the name of and on behalf of the City by the City Officials and delivered to the Lender. Any other Financing Documents and certificates necessary to the transaction described above may be executed by one or more appropriate officers of the City. All of the provisions of the Financing Documents, July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 9 Council Packet Page Number 10 of 297 E2 when executed as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The approval hereby given to the various Financing Documents referred to above includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by bond counsel to the City, the appropriate City staff person, or by the officers authorized herein to execute or accept, as the case may be, said documents prior to their execution; and said officersor staff members are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such document in accordance with the terms hereof. Mayor, City Manager, and Finance Director of the 1.05.Certifications of the City. The City and other officers, employees, and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to bond counsel and the Lender certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the issuance of the Note, including a certification of this resolution. Such officers, employees, and agents are hereby authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, all other certificates, instruments, and other written documents that may be requested by bond counsel, the Lender, or other persons or entities in conjunction with the issuance of the Note. Without imposing any limitation on the scope of the preceding sentence, such officers, employees, and agents are specifically authorized to execute and deliver one or more certificates of the City, an endorsement of the City to the Tax Certificate, an Information Return for Tax- Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues, Form8038, and all other documents and certificates as shall be necessary and appropriate in connection with the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Note. The City hereby authorizes Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, acting as bond counsel, to prepare, execute, and deliver its approving legal opinion with respect to the Note. 1.06.Security for the Note. The City hereby authorizes the Borrower to provide such security for payment of the Borrower’s obligations under the Loan Agreement and for payment of theNote, including the Mortgage, as is agreed upon by the Borrower and the Lender, and the City hereby approves the execution and delivery of such security. 1.07.DEED Application. As required by the terms of Section 469.154 of the Act, the employees, officers, and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to submit an application to DEED for approval of the Project and the issuance of the Note. 1.08.Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligation. In order to qualify the Note as a “qualified tax- exempt obligation” within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 10 Council Packet Page Number 11 of 297 E2 (a)the Note is a qualified 501(c)(3) bonds (as defined in Section 145 of the Code), and therefore is not treated as a “private activity bond” (as defined in Section 141 of the Code) for the purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (b)the City hereby designates the Note as a “qualified tax-exempt obligation” for purposes of Section265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds, that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2024 will not exceed $10,000,000; (d)not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2024 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; and (e)the aggregate face amount of the issue of the Note is not greater than $10,000,000. ity will cause to be kept at the office of the City 1.09.Registration of Transfer. The C Manager a Note Register for the Note in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, the City shall provide for the registration of transfers ofownership of the Note. The Note shall be initially registered in the name of the Lender and, subject to Section 1.12, shall be transferable upon the Note Register for the Note by the Lender in person or by its agent duly authorized in writing, upon surrender of such Note together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the City Manager, duly executed by the Lender or its duly authorized agent. The following form of assignment shall be sufficient for said purpose. For value received ___________ hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________ the within Note of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ___________________ attorney to transfer said Note on the books of said City with full power of substitution in the premises. The undersigned certifies that the transfer is made in accordance with the provisions of Sections 1.09 through 1.12 of the Resolution authorizing the issuance of the Note. Dated: ______________________ By: ______________________ Registered Owner Upon such transfer the City Manager shall note the date of registration and the name and address of the new Lender in the applicable Note Register and in the registration blank appearing on such Note; subject to receiptof a purchaser letter or certification as required by Section 1.12 hereof. July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 11 Council Packet Page Number 12 of 297 E2 1.10.Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed Note. In case the Note issued hereunder shall become mutilated or be destroyed or lost, the City shall, if not then prohibited by law, cause tobe executed and delivered, a new Note of like outstanding principal amount, number, series and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of such mutilated Note, or in lieu of and in substitution for such Note destroyed or lost, upon thepayment by the Lender of the reasonable expenses and charges of the City in connection therewith, and in the case of a Note destroyed or lost, the filing with the City of evidence satisfactory to the City with indemnity satisfactory to it. If the mutilated, destroyed or lost Note has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Note prior to payment. 1.11.Ownership of Note. The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered in the Note Register for the Note and by notation on the Note whether or not the Note shall be overdue, as the absolute owner of the Note for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of the principal balance, redemption priceor interest and for all other purposes whatsoever, and the City shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary. 1.12.Li mitation on Note Transfers. The Note shall be issued to a “qualified institutional buyer” or an “accredited investor” (i.e., theLender) and without registration under state or other securities laws, pursuant to an exemption for such issuance; and accordingly the Note may not be assigned or transferred in whole or part, nor may a participation interest in the Note be given pursuantto any participation agreement, except to another “qualified institutional buyer” or “accredited investor” in accordance with an applicable exemption from such registration requirements and with full and accurate disclosure of all material facts to the prospective purchaser(s) or transferee(s). The City will require, as a precondition to any transfer, that the transferee provide to the City a written letter or certificate in a form satisfactory to the City and other evidence satisfactory to the City that the transferee is a qualified institutional buyer or other accredited investor under the securities laws. 1.13.Issuance of New Note. Subject to the provisions of Section 1.12, the City shall, at the request and expense of the Lender, issue a new note, in aggregate outstanding principal amount equal to that of the Note surrendered, and of like tenor except as to number, principal amount, and the amount of the periodic installments payable thereunder, and registered in the name of the Lender or such transferee as may be designated by the Lender. Section 2.Miscellaneous. 2.01.Agreements Binding. All agreements, covenants, and obligations of the City contained in this resolution and in the above-referenced documents shall be deemed to be the agreements, covenants, and obligations of the City to the full extent authorized or permitted by law, and all such agreements, covenants, and obligations shall be binding on the City and enforceable in accordance with their terms. No agreement, covenant, or obligation contained in this resolution or in July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 12 Council Packet Page Number 13 of 297 E2 the above-referenced documents shall be deemed to be an agreement, covenant, or obligation of any member of the City Council, or of any officer, employee, or agent of the City in that person’s individual capacity. Neither the members of the City Council nor any officer executing the Note shall be liable personally on the Note or be subject to any personal liability or accountability by reason of the issuance of the Note. 2.02.Rights Conferred. Except as herein otherwise expressly provided, nothing in this resolution or in the Loan Agreement, expressed or implied, is intended or shall be construed to confer upon any person, firm, or corporation other than the City and the registered and beneficial owners of the Note, any right, remedy, or claim, legal or equitable, under and by reason of this resolution or any provision hereof or of the Loan Agreement or any provision thereof; this resolution, the Loan Agreement and all of their provisions being intended to be, and being for the sole and exclusive benefit of the City and the registered and beneficial owners of the Note issued under the provisions of this resolution and the Loan Agreement, and the Borrower to the extent expressly provided in the Loan Agreement. No provision, covenant, or agreement contained in the Financing Documents, the Note or in any other document relating to the Note, and no obligation therein or herein imposed upon the City or the breach thereof, shall constitute or give rise to any pecuniary liability of the City or any charge upon its general credit or taxing powers. In making the agreements, provisions, covenants, and representations set forth in such documents, the City has not obligated itself to pay or remit any funds or revenues, other than funds and revenues derived from the Loan Agreement which are to be applied to the payment of the Note, as provided therein and in the Financing Documents. 2.03.Validity. In case any one or more of the provisions of this resolution, or of the documents mentioned herein, or of the Note issued hereunder shall for any reason be held to be illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this resolution, or of the aforementioned documents, or of the Note, but this resolution, the aforementioned documents, and the Note shall be construed and endorsed as if such illegal or invalid provisions had not been contained therein. If for any reason the Mayor or the City Manager, or any other officers, employees, or agents of theCity authorized to execute certificates, instruments, or other written documents on behalf of the City, shall for any reason cease to be an officer, employee, or agent of the City after the execution by such person of any certificate, instrument, or otherwritten document, such fact shall not affect the validity or enforceability of such certificate, instrument, or other written document. If for any reason the Mayor or the City Manager is unable to execute and deliver the documents referred to in this resolution, such documents may be executed by any member of the City Council or any officer of the City delegated the duties of the Mayor or the City Manager with the same force and effect as if such documents were executed and delivered by the Mayor or the City Manager. July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 13 Council Packet Page Number 14 of 297 E2 2.04.Costs. The Borrower will pay the administrative fees of the City and pay, or, upon demand, reimburse the City for payment of, any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with financing the Project and issuing the Note, whether or not the Note are issued. The Borrower shall indemnify the City against all liabilities, losses, damages, costs, and expenses (including attorney's fees and expenses incurred by the City) arising with respect to the Project or the Note, as further provided for in the Loan Agreement. 2.05.Governmental Program. The City has established a governmental program of acquiring purpose investments for qualified 501(c)(3) organizations’ projects. The governmental program is one in which the following requirements of §1.148- 1(b) of the federal regulations relating to tax-exempt obligations shall be met: gram involves the origination or acquisition of purpose investments; (a)the pro (b)at least 95% of the cost of the purpose investments acquired under the program represents one or more loans to a substantial number of persons representing the general public, states or political subdivisions, 501(c)(3) organizations, persons who provide housing and related facilities, or any combination of the foregoing; (c) at least 95% of the receipts from the purpose investments are used to pay principal, interest, or redemption prices on issues that financed the program, to pay or reimburse administrative costs of those issues or of the program, to pay or reimburse anticipated future losses directly related to the program, to finance additional purpose investments for the same general purposes of the program, or to redeem and retire governmental obligations at the next earliest possible date of redemption; and (d)the program documents prohibit any obligor on a purpose investment financed by the program or any related party to that obligor from purchasing bonds of an issue that finances the program in an amount related to the amount of the purpose investment acquired from that obligor; and (e)the City shall not waive the right to treat the investment as a program investment. 2.06.Declaration of Official Intent to Reimburse Expenditures. (a)The United States Department of the Treasury has promulgated final regulations governing the use of the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds, all or a portion of which are to be used to reimburse the City or a borrower from the City for project expenditures paid prior to the date of issuance of such bonds. Those regulations, Section 1.150-2 of the Regulations, require that the City adopt a statement of official intent to reimburse an original expenditure not later than sixty (60) days after payment of the original expenditure. The Regulations also generally require that the bonds be July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 14 Council Packet Page Number 15 of 297 E2 issued and the reimbursement allocation made from the proceeds of the bonds occur within eighteen (18) months after the later of: (i) the date the expenditure is paid; or (ii) the date the project is placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than three (3) years after the date the expenditure is paid. The Regulations generally permit reimbursement of capital expenditures and costs of issuance of the bonds. (b)The City reasonably expects to reimburse the Borrower for the expenditures made for costs of the Project from the proceeds of the Note. All reimbursed expenditures shall be capital expenditures, a cost of issuance of the Note, or other expenditures eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Regulations and also qualifying expenditures under the Act. (c) Based on representations by the Borrower, no expenditures for the Project have been made by the Borrower more than sixty (60) days before the date of adoption of this resolution other than: (i) expenditures to be paid or reimbursed from sources other than the Note; (ii) expenditures permitted to be reimbursed under prior regulations pursuant to the transitional provision contained in Section 1.150-2(j)(2)(i)(B) of the Regulations; (iii) expenditures constituting preliminary expenditures within the meaning of Section 1.150-2(f)(2) of the Regulations; (iv) expenditures in a “de minimis” amount (as defined in Section 1.150-2(f)(1) of the Regulations); or (v) pursuant to a declaration of official intent by the Borrower in accordance with Section 1.150-2 of the Regulations. (d)Based on representations by the Borrower, as of the date hereof, there are no funds of the Borrower reserved, allocated on a long-term basis or otherwise set aside (or reasonably expected to be reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside) to provide permanent financing for the expenditures related to the Project to be financed from proceeds of the Note, other than pursuant to the issuance of the Note. This resolution, therefore, is determined to be consistent with the budgetary and financial circumstances of the Borrower as they exist or are reasonably foreseeable on the date hereof. 2.07.Effective Date. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its approval. The approvals contained in the resolution are effective for one year after the date hereof. Seconded by Councilmember VillavicencioAyes – All The motion passed. I.UNFINISHED BUSINESS None J.NEW BUSINESS July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 15 Council Packet Page Number 16 of 297 E2 1.Resolution Ordering the Abatement of Hazardous Building and Public Nuisance Conditions at 1279 Ripley Avenue East Community Development Director Parr gave the staff report. CouncilmemberCavemoved to approve the Resolution Ordering the Abatement of Hazardous Building and Public Nuisance Conditions at 1279 Ripley Avenue East. Resolution 24-07-2334 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF HAZARDOUS BUILDING AND PUBLIC NIDSANCE CONDITIONS AT 1279 RIPLEY AVENUE EAST RECITALS WHEREAS, the property located at 1279 Ripley Avenue E and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Subject Property") contains a single-family dwelling (the "Dwelling") and is located in the city of Maplewood (the "City"); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is owned by Michael P. Thompson and James F. Preissner (the "Owners") according to public records and, to the best of the City's knowledge, is presently unoccupied; and WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, pursuant to a duly obtained administrative search warrant, a physical inspection of the Subject Property and the Dwelling was conducted by the city's building official, Randy Johnson (the "Building Official") and the city's building inspector, Dan Lentz, during which the following conditions were observed: (1)The Dwelling's roof system is seriously deteriorated and compromised with numerous large holes, leaving the interior exposed to the elements and allowing water to infiltrate the Dwelling. (2)The Dwelling's roof sheathing and supporting roof structure are significantly deteriorated and damaged. (3)Ceilings are collapsed and have fallen into numerous areas throughout the interior of the Dwelling. (4)Numerous walls, portions of floors, and other framing throughout the dwelling are deteriorated, rotted, and failing. (5)The Dwelling's interior is extensively filled with piled up rubbish and other debris, including throughout the occupiable spaces that were safely accessible. The Dwelling's interior smells strongly of mold or mildew. (6)Theexterior portion of the Subject Property contains an accumulation of rubbish and debris, including scrap materials, a decaying mattress, discarded furniture, and large piles of brush and debris in the yard. July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 16 Council Packet Page Number 17 of 297 E2 WHEREAS, while inside the Dwelling, staff was unable to complete a full inspection of the Dwelling's second floor due to the rotted upper level floor joist and an inability to safely access that location; and WHEREAS, since the above-mentioned inspection, there have been no permits pulled for the Dwelling that would indicate any improvements to the conditions observed on February 14, 2024;and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 463.15, subdivision 3 defines a "hazardous building" as "any building ... which because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, physical damage, unsanitary condition or abandonment, constitutes a fire hazard or a hazard to public safety or health"; and WHEREAS, section 18-31(5) of the Maplewood City Code (the "City Code") deems it a public nuisance to accumulate rubbish, debris, and other offensive materials on property; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 463.161 and section 18-37 of the City Code authorize the city council to order the owner of any hazardous building or nuisance property within the City to correct or remove said conditions; and WHEREAS, additionally,Minn. R. 1300.0180 expressly requires that unsafe structures "be abated \[under\] Minnesota Statutes, sections 463.15 to 463.26."; and WHEREAS, based on the information presented, the city council has determined that the condition of the Subject Property and the Dwelling constitutes a hazard and a public nuisance in violation of both state and local law and, therefore, should be abated. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Maplewood as follows: 1.The city council adopts, as factual findings, all of the recitals listed above. 2.The city council finds that the Dwelling is hazardous, as defined by Minnesota Statutes, section 463.15, and unsafe, as defined in Minnesota Rules, section 1300.0180. 3.The city council also finds that the condition of the Subject Property constitutes a public nuisance, as defined by both state and local law, and violates the aforementioned sections of the City Code, and is a menace to the health of the inhabitants of the city. 4.The city attorney shall finalize an abatement order substantially similar to that attached as Exhibit B attached hereto. July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 17 Council Packet Page Number 18 of 297 E2 5.The city attorney is authorized to take all necessary legal steps to effectuate service of this resolution and the corresponding abatement order in the manner required by state and/or local law. 6.The city attorney and city staff are authorized to take all necessary legal steps to secure compliance with the abatement order and to obtain authority to remove and abate the hazardous and nuisance conditions on the Subject Property by court order and collect and/or assess the costs thereof against the Subject Property, as otherwise permitted by state and/or local law. EXHIBIT A Lots 25, 26 and 27, Block 1, W.M. Fisher's Addition to Gladstone, Minn., together with the South1/2 of vacated alley adjoining that accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof, RamseyCounty, Minnesota. Abstract Property (PID 162922410010) EXHIBIT B Abatement Order STATEOF MINNNESOTADISTRICTCOURT COUNTYOFRAMSEYSECONDJUDICIALDISTRICT ________________________________ CaseType: OtherCivil In the Matter ofthe Hazardous Building and Nuisance Property Located at1279Ripley Avenue E,Maplewood,Minnesota ORDER FOR ABATEMENT OF HAZARDOUS BUILDING AND PUBLICNUISANCE ________________________________ TO:Allowners,occupants,andalllienholdersofrecord. The city council of the city of Maplewood, Minnesota hereby orders that within 45 days of service of this order that you abate the hazardous and nuisance conditions which exist on the property located at 1279 Ripley Avenue E, Maplewood, Minnesota, which property is legally described as: Lots 25, 26 and 27, Block 1, WM Fisher's Addition to Gladstone, Minn., together with the South 1 /2of vacated alley adjoining that accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof,Ramsey County, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 18 Council Packet Page Number 19 of 297 E2 Specifically, the city of Maplewood, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 463 and the Minnesota State Building Code,has determined that the unoccupied single-family dwelling (the "Dwelling") located on the Subject Property is hazardous and unsafe due to the following observations: the Dwelling's roof system is seriously deteriorated and compromised with numerous large holes, leaving the interior exposed to the elements and allowing water to infiltratethe Dwelling; the Dwelling's roof sheathing and supporting roof structure are significantlydeteriorated and damaged; ceilings are collapsed and have fallen into numerous areas throughoutthe interior of the Dwelling; numerous walls, portions of floors, and other framing throughout thedwelling are deteriorated, rotted, and failing; the Dwelling's interior is extensively filled with piledup rubbish and other debris, including throughout the occupiable spaces that were safelyaccessible; and the Dwelling's interior smells strongly of mold or mildew. Additionally, the exterior portion of the above-referenced property contains an accumulation of rubbish and debris, includingscrap materials, a decaying mattress, discarded furniture, and large piles of brush and debris in the yard. For those reasons, the city of Maplewood,pursuant to chapter 18 of the Maplewood City Code and Minnesota Statutes, section 609.74, alsohas determined that the property constitutes a public nuisance. Pursuant to the above-referenced statutes and ordinances, it is hereby ORDERED that youabate the above-mentioned conditions within 45 days of the date of service of this order by either(i) razing (demolishing) the Dwelling and removing all debris and other materials from the property, or (ii) performing each and every one of the following items: 1.Repair or replace the Dwelling's deteriorated roof system in accordance with the Minnesota State BuildingCode; 2.Repair or replace all of the Dwelling's deteriorated walls, framing and other structural components in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, including a structural analysis of deteriorated components to ensure safety and habitability; 3.Repair or replace all of the Dwelling's deteriorated floors and ceilings in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code; 4.Determine the existence of mold due to the significant water infiltration and mitigate said mold, as deemed necessary; 5.Remove all accumulations of garbage, rubbish, and other debris from the Dwelling's interior to ensure the health and safety of occupants and sufficient ingress and egress throughout the Dwelling; and 6.Remove the accumulation of rubbish and debris from the property's exterior, including scrap materials, the decaying mattress, discarded furniture, and largepiles of brush and debris in the yard. All such work is subject to permitting and required inspections by staff members of the city to ensure compliance with applicable rules and law. This order is not a permit. You are July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 19 Council Packet Page Number 20 of 297 E2 furtheradvised that unless such corrective action is taken or an answer is served on the city and filedwithin 21 days of the date of service of this order upon you, a motion for summary enforcementof this order may be made to the Ramsey County District Court. Finally, you are further advised that if you do not comply with this order and the city is compelled to take corrective action, it will pursue the Dwelling's demolition and other exterior nuisance abatement efforts, and all necessary costs incurred by the city in taking such correctiveaction will be collected and assessed against the property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section463.21 and section 18-37of the Maplewood City Code. In connection thereto, the city also intendsto recover all of its expenses incurred in carrying out this order, including specifically but notexclusively, filing fees, service fees, publication fees, attorneys' fees, appraisers' fees, witnessfees, including expert witness fees and traveling expenses incurred by the city from the time thisorder was originally made, also pursuant to state and local law. \[ signature page to follow\] Dated , 2024 ------ KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED By: _____________ David T. Anderson (#0393517) 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 Attorney for City of Maplewood ACKNOWLEDGMENT The undersigned acknowledges that costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 549 .211, subd. 2, to the party against whomthe allegations in this pleading are asserted. _________________________ David T. Anderson Seconded by Councilmember LeeAyes – All The motion passed. 2.Harvest Park Master Plan July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 20 Council Packet Page Number 21 of 297 E2 Public Works Director Love gave the presentation. ed to approve the Harvest Park Master Plan. CouncilmemberJuenemannmov Seconded by Councilmember CaveAyes – All The motion passed. 3.EAB Private Ash Tree Relief Policy Public Works Director Love gave the presentation. Council discussed the agenda item and came to a consensuson the EAB relief amount and assessment payback period. CouncilmemberJuenemannmoved to approve the EAB Private Ash Tree Relief Policy with a maximum amount of $3,000 per property to be assessed over 5 years. Seconded by Councilmember VillavicencioAyes – All The motion passed. K.AWARD OF BIDS None L.ADJOURNMENT Mayor Abrams adjourned the meeting at 8:29p.m. July 22, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes 21 Council Packet Page Number 22 of 297 F1a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO: City Council REPORT FROM: Michael Sable, City Manager PRESENTER: Michael Sable, City Manager AGENDA ITEM: Council Calendar Update Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/AgreementProclamation Policy Issue: This item is informational and intended to provide the Council an indication on the current planning for upcoming agenda items and the Work Session schedule. These are not official announcements of the meetings, but a snapshot look at the upcoming meetings for the City Council to plan their calendars. Recommended Action: No motion needed. This is an informational item. Upcoming Agenda Items and Work Sessions Schedule: August 16: Special Council Meeting at 4 pm: Canvass of Primary Election Results August 26: Workshop: Council Member Training September 9: Workshop: Cannabis Rules Update September 9: Council Meeting: 2025 Preliminary Levy September 23: Workshop: Purple Line Route Update (tentative) October 14: Workshop: Ramsey County EDA and Housing w/ Commissioner Reinhardt Council Comments: Comments regarding Workshops, Council Meetings or other topics of concern or interest. Council Packet Page Number 23 of 297 F1a 2024 Major Community Outreach Events Cop on a Rooftop for Special Olympics Friday, August 16 (6 – 11:30 am) Dunkin Donuts (County Road D / Hwy 610 Rice-Larpenteur Summer Block Party Saturday, August 17 (11 am – 3 pm) Southwest Corner of Rice/Larpenteur Intersection Celebrate Summer - August Wednesday, August 21 (6 – 7:30 pm) Edgerton Park Friday Fireworks Friday, September 20 (Festivies start at 5 pm, Fireworks at 8 pm) Hazelwood Fire Department Open House Saturday, October 5 (Time TBD) North Fire Station Trunk or Treat Sunday, October 27 (1 - 4 pm) City Hall Parking Lot Council Packet Page Number 24 of 297 F3 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Parks & Recreation Commission Steven Love, Public Works Director/City Engineer Audra Robbins, Parks &Recreation Manager PRESENTER:Mark Harris, Parks & Recreation Commission Chair AGENDA ITEM: Parks & Recreation Commission Annual Report Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The Parks & Recreation Commission is seeking City Council approval of their annual report that includes their 2024 commission goals. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the 2023 Parks & Recreation Commission Annual Report. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is 0.00 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated CommunicationOperational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The Parks & Recreation Commission provides recommendations to the City Council on issues of park development, environmental issues, open space, trails and leisure programs, and works closely with City staff to implement the mission of the department. Background: The attached Annual Report highlights key accomplishments in 2023 by the Parks & Recreation Commission and their goals for 2024. Attachments: 1.2023 Annual Report Council Packet Page Number 25 of 297 F3, Attachment 1 QBSLT!'!SFDSFBUJPO!DPNNJTTJPO 3134!BOOVBM!SFQPSU Purpose The Maplewood Parks & Recreation Commission (PRC) is a seven-member, volunteer advisory board consisting of Maplewood residents committed to promoting parks and recreation issues. The commission provides recommendations to the City Council on all issues of park acquisition, development, open space, trails and leisure programs. The Parks & Recreation Commission ÐThe mission of Maplewood Parks & Recreation is to provide diverse recreational opportunities for people of all ages and abilities, enhance and preserve our parks, facilities, and open spaces while promoting environmental stewardship through education and outreachÑ 2023 Highlights Sunset Ridge Playground ReplacementApplewood and Carver Preserves Restoration Project City Hall Campus Pollinator ProjectCommunity Outreach Events with Great River Greening Council Packet Page Number 26 of 297 F3, Attachment 1 The Parks & Recreation Commission consists of seven members appointed by the Craig Brannon - Member Member Since 01/01/97 Terri Mallet - Chair Member Since 02/11/13 Kimii Porter - Member Member Since 11/14/16 Vickie Lee-Her - Member Member Since 05/19/21 Monica Barton - Vice Chair Member Since 10/20/21 Mark Harris - Member Member Since 10/20/21 Jason DeMoe - Member 2023 PRC - (left to right) Member Since 10/19/22 Monica Barton, Jason DeMoe, Mark Harris, Terri Mallet, Kimii Porter, Vickie Lee-Her, Craig Brannon. Nikki Villavicencio - City Council Liaison Audra Robbins - Staff Liaison TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS UPDATE An important goal of the Parks & Natural Resources Commission is to receive regular updates on the implementation of the Nature Center and Programming Task Force recommendations. In 2023, they weighed in on several of these including: Support independent groups using the outdoor areas. ¤ The Friends of Maplewood Nature again offered their Gnome Challenge on the Nature Center trails, as well as the Tree Trek program. The Friends of Maplewood Nature also provide the prizes for our two Nature Photo Contests. ¤ District 622 Adaptive programs have used the Nature Center trail for new programs/classes. Opening the building. ¤ The Nature Center building is currently open to the public from 9:00a.m. to 3:00p.m. Monday through Friday and for special events and programs. Identify rental options to encourage use. ¤ The Parks & Natural Resources Department rents out snowshoes for use on the Nature Center grounds. More connection to community education and other partners ¤ The City continues to partner with Community Education, Ramsey County 4H, YMCA and other community organizations to offer and promote environmental and recreation programming. We recommend staff to identify groups who are looking for space, and providing access to their needs. ¤ Council Packet Page Number 27 of 297 F3, Attachment 1 2023 Goals & Accomplishments 2023 Goals 1.Review the Parks & Recreation System Master Plan and stay on top of park improvement plans 2.Continue to look for new ways to engage in community outreach and be involved in community events 3.Take a bus tour of our parks system 4.Hold a meeting to discuss connectivity and trails with neighboring cities and Ramsey County 5.Hold a meeting dedicated to review the implementation progress of the Nature Center and Programming Task Force recommenda- tions and receive regular updates. 6.Value the youth perspective and recruit/appoint a student PRC member 7.Receive annual updates from the MCC/YMCA, as well as updates from community groups and partners to look for ways to work together 8.Review and evaluate the current signage in our parks and open spaces 2023 Accomplishments ¤Recruited student Parks & Recreation Commission members ¤Awarded a MN DNR SUFR Grant to replant park trees ¤Full schedule of Community Outreach Events ¤Revamped volunteer program ¤Eagle Scout /Friends of Maplewood Nature Bird Feeding Station Project ¤Implemented Goodrich Park Improvements ¤ YMCA ¤Sunset Ridge Park Playground Replacement ¤Awarded a Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District LEAP (Landscape Ecology Awards Program) Award for the Prairie Farm ¤Campus Pollinator Project with Great River Greening ¤Applewood and Carver Preserves Restoration Project ¤In addition, the Parks & Recreation Commission weighed in on general department updates Council Packet Page Number 28 of 297 F3, Attachment 1 2024 Parks & Recreation Goals them to the Strategic Priorities created by the City Council. The PRC acknowledges that successful 1.Continue to review the Parks & Recreation System Master Plan and park improvement plans 2.Continue to look for new ways to engage in community outreach and be involved in at least two community events 3.Take a bus tour of our parks system 4.Hold a meeting to discuss connectivity and trails with neighboring cities and Ramsey County 5.Hold a meeting dedicated to review the implementation progress of the Nature Center and Programming Task Force recommendations and receive regular updates 6.Value the youth perspective and recruit/appoint student PRC members 7.Receive annual updates from the MCC/YMCA, as well as updates from community groups and partners to look for ways to work together 8.Review and evaluate the current and future signage in our parks and open spaces Council Packet Page Number 29 of 297 F4 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Environmentaland Natural ResourcesCommission Steven Love, Public Works Director/City Engineer Audra Robbins, Parks & Recreation Manager Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner PRESENTER:David Lates, Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Vice- Chair AGENDA ITEM: Environmental Natural Resources Commission Annual Report Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The Environmental and Natural Resources Commission is seeking City Council approval of their annual report that includes their 2024 commission goals. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the 2023 Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Annual Report. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is 0.00 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated CommunicationOperational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The Environmental and Natural Resources Commission’s annual report serves as an important method of updating the City Council and the community on the City’s environmental accomplishments and priorities. Background: The 2023 annual report summarizes the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission’s 2023 accomplishments and 2024 work plan and environmental priorities recommendations. The report also summarizes the City’s sustainability program including GreenStep Cities and Climate Adaptation accomplishments. Attachments: 1.Environmental and Natural Resources Commission 2023 Annual Report Council Packet Page Number 30 of 297 F4, Attachment 1 2023 Environmental and Natural Resources Commission Annual Report Purpose The Environmental and Natural Resources (ENR) Commission provides recommendations to the Community Design Review Board, Planning Commission, and City Council on changes necessary to existing policies, operating procedures and ordinances that control, protect, preserve and enhance the City’s environmental assets. The Commission works closely with the Parks and Natural Resources Department to implement the mission of the department. Mission In order to protect, preserve and enhance the environment of the City of Maplewood, the ENR Commission will: 1.Actively participate in and support the mission and goals of the Maplewood Nature Center and Neighborhood Preserves by promoting environmental awareness through educational programs, communications and co-sponsored activities. 2.Pro-actively promote greater use and appreciations of the City’s environmental assets. 3.Review the role of other City groups and how they might assist, support and advise the ENR Commission. 4.Sponsor environmental projects to enhance, repair, replace or restore neglected or deteriorating environmental assets of the City. 5.Develop educational programs and materials that foster the mission of the ENR Commission. 6.Develop and promote the use of “sustainable practices” for City policies and procedures. Membership The ENR Commission is a seven-member, volunteer advisory commission with three-year terms. The membership is made up of Maplewood residents committed to preserving and enhancing the environment. The Commissioners include: Member Term Emma Broadnax10-25-21 to 09-30-24 Rebecca Bryan04-26-21 to 09-30-24 Nancy Edwards 02--23 to 09-30-25 Benjamin Guell10-25-21 to 09-30-24 David Lates02--23 to 09-30-25 Ted Redmond11-14-16 to 09-30-25 Council Packet Page Number 31 of 297 F4, Attachment 1 There is one vacancy on the Commission, left by Mollie Miller when she resigned from her position on September 30, 2023. ENR Commission Staff Liaison The Parks and Natural Resources Department provides staff liaisons and technical support for two of the City’s citizen advisory Commissions including the ENR Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission. Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner, is the staff liaison to the ENR Commission. 2023 Environmental Accomplishments 1.Review of a Wetland Buffer Variance (1910 County Road C East). An unused stormwater discharge system needed to be removed from the site during the development of the 72-unit senior housing development. The removal impacted the wetland buffer adjacent the creek. The ENR Commission made recommendations on mitigation strategies that would protect the creek including re-establishing the buffer with native plugs and increasing the buffer area on the southwest side of the building. 2.Residential Recycling and Trash 2023 Annual Review: The contract with Tennis Sanitation and Republic Services requires that the City hold an annual review of the residential recycling and trash collection services and adopt an annual work plan with service improvement recommendations. 3.Clean Energy for All Project Review: The Clean Energy for All project included research, recommendations, and outreach of energy saving strategies for historically underserved populations living at manufactured home parks. The outreach portion of the project focused on 800 households at three manufactured home parks in Maplewood. 4.Climate Mitigation Planning: The ENR Commission offered guidance and recommendations on the first phase of the project, including the creation of a survey and education and outreach throughout the summer and fall. 5.Green Building Code: The ENR Commission has been reviewing the Green Building Code to ensure it is meeting the City’s sustainability goals and adding electric vehicle requirements and other green building initiatives. This work will continue in 2024. 6.Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG): The EECBG program is part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Maplewood is eligible for a formula grant for $76,530. The ENR Commission offered expertise into the grant proposal including the creation of a Green Fleet pathway that centers on an effective transition to alternative fuels, aiding decision-makers in understanding annual financial effects, conversion-ready vehicles, weighing costs against emissions, and underlining market choices. 2024 Work Plan Work plan items include subject matters that are carried over from last year’s environmental priorities, or subject matters that require review by the ENR Commission based on City contract, policy, ordinance or State rules or regulations. In 2024 the ENR Commission will review the following items: 2 Council Packet Page Number 32 of 297 F4, Attachment 1 1.Residential Recycling and Trash 2024 Annual Review: The contract with Tennis Sanitation and Republic Services require an annual review. 2.Residential Trash and Recycling Contract Extension or Request for Proposal(RFP): The residential trash and recycling contracts end June 30, 2024. The City is reviewing extensionproposals for these contracts. 3.Climate Mitigation Planning: The ENR Commission will participate in the second phase of the Climate Mitigation Planning process throughout 2024. Phase 2 includes an exploration of needs and actions to address climate mitigationof both municipal operations and community-wide, with the end result being the creation of a Climate Mitigation Plan to assist the City in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The ENR Commission appointed two members to serve on the Climate Mitigation Strategic Planning Team. 4.Green Building Code: The ENR Commission will continue to review the City’s Green Building Code to ensure it is meeting the City’s sustainability goals, and to review options for electric vehicle requirements and other green building initiatives. Environmental Priorities Yearly the ENR Commission recommends environmental priorities that should be reviewed based on new or revised regulations, programs, technologies, or identified problems. In 2024 the ENR Commission recommends a focuson recycling and food scrap educationand outreach. The ENR Commission will coordinate their efforts with Ramsey County to promote the new curbside Food Scraps Program now available to all Maplewood residents. ility Updates 2023 Sustainab Maplewood’scomprehensive plan incorporates a sustainability approach that strengthen the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of any issue. An important element of that plan is reporting on sustainability indicators. Following is a sampling of those indicators from 2023. GreenStep Cities As one of the first cities to sign onto the GreenStep Cities program in 2010, Maplewood has remained a leader in sustainability throughout the state. Of 148 Minnesota cities participating in the program, Maplewoodis one of 41 cities awarded Step 5 for measuring and making improvements on sustainability best practice metrics. Improvements in these areas is a clear indication that the city, county, and state policies and programs are having a positive impact. From 2022 to 2023 the City showed improvement in the following areas: 3 Council Packet Page Number 33 of 297 F4, Attachment 1 Increase in the Number of private green certified public buildings – from 7 to 20 (increase of 13) Net number of new trees planted in right-of-ways, parks, and from the City’s tree sale - from 143 to 303 (increase of 160 new trees) Percent of residential solid waste recycled – from 22.90% of Maplewood’s overall residential solid waste to 23.60% (increase of .7%) Percent of residential solid waste composted – from 3.76% of Maplewood’s overall residential solid waste to 4.20% (increase of .44%) Number of local food venues that sell, serve, or grow healthy/local foods – from 17 to 18 (increase of 1) Decrease in the Annual vehicle miles traveled for government diesel fleet vehicles - from 104,686 miles per year to 82,706 miles (decrease of 21,980 miles per year) Percent impaired public waters (lakes and streams) - from 62% to 38% (6 of Maplewood’s 16 public waters – a reduction of 24%) Residential solid waste generated per resident, per day – from 1.88 pounds to 1.84 pounds (decrease of .04 pounds) Greenhouse gas emissions from city-wide travel – from 213,701 tons of CO2 to 206,788 tons of CO2 (decrease of 6,913 tons of CO2) Greenhouse gas emissions from city-wide waste (from 7,313 tons of CO2 to 6,935 tons CO2 (decrease of 378 tons of CO2) Green Team The Maplewood Green Team’s mission statement is to promote environmentally sustainable operating practices by implementing and influencing feasible approaches to reducing emissions and pollution within the city. The Green Team is made up of representatives from most City Departments and serves as the internal steering committee for the GreenStep Cities program and the Climate Adaptation Plan. In 2023, the Green Team coordinated Climate Mitigation Planning, Green Building Code, and Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant efforts with the Environmental and Natural Resources Commission. In particular, the Green Team reviewed the Climate Mitigation Plan survey and research opportunities, researched aspects of the Green Building Code amendments, and offered feedback and guidance on the Fleet Study grant as part of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant. The Green Team also sponsored the City Hall Campus Clean Up, did outreach and education at the employee picnic and holiday buffet, and made improvements to the City Hall Courtyard. 4 Council Packet Page Number 34 of 297 F4, Attachment 1 ClimateAdaptation Plan The City Council approved the Climate Adaptation Plan in May 2021. All City infrastructure projects include improvements that will create a more resilient community, including stormwater management based on updated climate predictions and planting climateresilient trees. In 2023 the City began implementation of the Climate Mitigation Plan, which is the critical and final piece needed in the City’s climate resilience planning, fulfilling the energy resilience-planning goal of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and addressing a key implementation strategy of the City’s Climate Adaptation Plan. The planning process will result in strategic goals across multiple sectors with concrete short-, mid-, and long-term actions to advance climate resilience and capacity. The first phase of the planning efforts began in 2023 with education and outreach. During this phase the City created a Climate Mitigation Plan survey to collect input from residents and businesses in order to identify perceptions, needs, opportunities, priorities, and issues for the City to address in the plan. The survey was distributed during various City events and through social media and newsletter posts. 5 Council Packet Page Number 35 of 297 F5 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Steven Love, Public Works Director / City Engineer PRESENTER:Steven Love, Public Works Director / City Engineer AGENDA ITEM: Metro Transit Purple Line Project Update Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The Purple Line project team is in the process of studying the White Bear Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Route Alternative. At the July 22, 2024 City Council Workshop, the Purple Line project team was asked to attend the August 12, 2024 City Council meeting to continue the workshop discussion on the Purple Line study of the White Bear Avenue Corridor BRT Route Alternative. Recommended Action: No action is required. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0.00 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: No City funding is utilized as part ofthe Purple Line route alternative study. Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated CommunicationOperational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The Purple Line project team is in the process of studying the White Bear Avenue Corridor BRT Route Alternative. The Purple Line BRT will provide fast and reliable transit services to the east metro area. Background: At the July 22, 2024 City Council Workshop, the Purple Line project team presented on several topics related to the Purple Line study of White Bear Avenue Corridor BRT Route Alternative. The Purple Line project team has prepared a memorandum responding to questions the City Council nd had at the July 22 workshop (see attached memorandum). The Purple Line project team was also Council Packet Page Number 36 of 297 F5 asked to attend the August 12, 2024 City Council meeting to continue the City Council Workshop discussion. The Purple Line team have prepared a short presentation which focuses on the project development process, specifically the steps leading up to a revised Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) recommendation which is anticipated in October, and the next steps after a revised LPA recommendation is made. The presentation will highlight where and how the City of Maplewood will continue to be engaged in the process as the revised LPA is advanced. Attachments: 1.Purple Line Presentation 2.Purple Line Memorandum Council Packet Page Number 37 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 August 12, 2024 | Maplewood City Council Meeting 7/22 City Council Workshop Follow-Up Council Packet Page Number 38 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 Memo responding to 7/22 Workshop questionsLocally Preferred Alternative ApprovalDesign AdvancementEnvironmental ReviewConstruction PhaseCommunity Outreach & Engagement ΑΑΑΑΑΑ Opening RemarksRoadmap to a Revised Locally Preferred Alternative RecommendationPost Revised Locally Preferred Alternative Recommendation Next Steps ¤¤¤2 Oj_ù Oth Council Packet Page Number 39 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 Ramsey County | 3 Opening Remarks Commissioner Victoria Reinhardt Council Packet Page Number 40 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 Explore White Bear Ave Corridor as an alternative to collocating with Bruce Vento Regional Trail Α Ramsey County introduced a letter during March 22, 2023 Maplewood lead public engagement workshopWhite Bear Ave Corridor is currently at 1% level of design (conceptual engineering)Project staff provided a Technical Memo to respond to questions from July 22nd City Council Workshop ¤¤¤4 Route Modification Study Phase II Council Packet Page Number 41 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 Project Manager | 5 Roadmap to Revised Locally Preferred Alternative Craig Lamothe Council Packet Page Number 42 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 been part of the Route been part of the Route Modification Study. been the focus of the Route Modification Study, specifically northern Bus Rapid Transit was recommended as part of the May 2017 Locally Preferred Alternative and a reconsideration of mode has notModification Study.A reconsideration of the BRT Route between Union Depot in downtown St. Paul and Maryland Avenue has notThe BRT Route between Maryland Avenue in St. Paul and downtown White Bear Lake hasendpoint and corridor. ΑΑΑ Transitway Mode (light rail, bus rapid transit, streetcar, etc.)Alignment (route of the transitway)General Station Locations ¤¤¤6 What is a Revised Locally Preferred Alternative? Council Packet Page Number 43 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 A detailed design, or evenA preliminary design (General dimensions and location of major project elements such as station platforms, roadway layout, structures), or A decision on center running or side running bus lanes, or inclusion of medians. ¤¤¤7 ! Lltlj =h_}} Ilqllj !}l_tl t ?AOÛ Council Packet Page Number 44 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 Project staff review proposed draft recommendation with Technical Advisory Committee considers staff recommendation Community & Business Advisory Committee considers staff Corridor Management Committee considers staff recommendation Project staff propose a draft recommendation for project committee , 2024: TBD Steve Love and Michael Martinrepresent MaplewoodCBAC includes several Maplewood residents and business representativesCouncilmember Villavicencio represents Maplewood ΑΑΑ Mid-September:consideration September 23, 2024:Maplewood City CouncilSeptember 24, 2024:September 27, 2024:recommendation October and recommends a Revised Locally Preferred Alternative to Metropolitan Council and Ramsey County ¤¤¤¤¤8 Revised Locally Preferred Alternative Recommendation Council Packet Page Number 45 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 Project Manager | 9 Advancing a Revised Locally Preferred Alternative Craig Lamothe Council Packet Page Number 46 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 BIPOC communitiesFolks with disabilitiesFolks with lower incomesTransit usersFolks who live in multifamily housing andpublic housing complexesSeniorsStudentsIndividuals in recovery, treatment facilitiesor transitional housing ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ Emphasis on: ¤ In community spacesBy partnering with communitygroups and organizationsThrough visits to residences ΑΑΑ Meet people where they are atFocus on connecting with folksfrom diverse communities and where they are going ¤¤10 Ongoing, Inclusive Community Outreach & Engagement Council Packet Page Number 47 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 Multifamily and single-family housingCommunity centers, libraries, service centersBus stops, transit centers, transit publicationsSchools Housing complexes where seniors and folks with disabilities resideRecovery Centers and Transitional Housing ComplexesGrocery stores, shopping centers and medical facilitiesParks and trails ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ Where ¤ Iïù _j h~~t ll éth}jtr h}_} events)Canvassing/door-knockingPartnering with community, neighborhood and business groupsStakeholder presentations and meetings (groups and one-on-one)Display/feedback boards at community centersSurveys/comment forms (paper and digital)Social Media and digital tools (storyboard, interactive map)Direct mail, phone and emailMedia ads (culturally diverse and accessible publications/media outlets)Translated materials and communications 11 ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ How and Where We Connect with Community How ¤ Council Packet Page Number 48 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 approving adopting an public hearing including (mode, alignment, station Maplewood City Councilconsiders for the Revised Locally Preferred Alternative Metropolitan Council considers Purple Line Corridor Management Committee recommends to Metropolitan Council and Ramsey County public review and comment period 45-day Α Vtl ©§©« ñMtr ©§©¬Ùa Resolution of SupportMtr ñM~~l ©§©¬Ù October 2024:a Revised Locally Preferred Alternative locations)Amendment to Transportation Policy Plan for the recommended Revised Locally Preferred Alternative ¤¤ ¤12 Revised Locally Preferred Alternative Approval Process Council Packet Page Number 49 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 for Resolution of Support review design plans for 30 Λ{ǒƒƒĻƩ ЋЉЋЎΜ ЌЉі 5ĻƭźŭƓ tƌğƓƭ Maplewood staff considers approving a comments and addresses comments as appropriate Maplewood staff Maplewood City Council participate in biweekly technical Issue Resolution Team meetings to resolve ΛźƓƷĻƩ ЋЉЋЍΜ ЊЎі 5ĻƭźŭƓ tƌğƓƭ General dimensions and location of major project elements (station platforms, roadway layout, structures) Α Maplewood staff issues along side project staff and other project partners. After each major design milestone (e.g., 15%, 30%), days to provide formal comment.Project staff responds to in subsequent design plans.Spring -Summer 2025:Preliminary Design Plans ¤¤¤¤13 Preliminary Design (2024-2025) Council Packet Page Number 50 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 , public hearing public review and comment period Based on the 15% Preliminary Design Plans 30-day review for Maplewood staff to provide formal comment 30-day including Responses to Agency and Public Comments ΑΑΑΑ Supplemental Environmental Analysis DocumentAmended Environmental Decision Document ¤¤14 Environmental Review (2024-2025) Council Packet Page Number 51 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 tƌğƓƭ ЊЉЉі 5ĻƭźŭƓ Λ{ƦƩźƓŭ ЋЉЋАΜ Maplewood staff ) comments and addresses ΛźƓƷĻƩ ЋЉЋЏΜ ВЉі 5ĻƭźŭƓ tƌğƓƭ g( Maplewood staff participate in biweekly technical Design Advancement Λ{ƦƩźƓŭ ЋЉЋЏΜ ЏЉі 5ĻƭźŭƓ tƌğƓƭ Maplewood staff& Refinement Team meetings to resolve issues along side project staff.After each major design milestone (e.g., 60%, 90%), review design plans for 30 days to provide formal comment.Project staff responds to comments as appropriate in subsequent design plans. ¤¤¤ 15 Advance & Final Design (2026-2027) Council Packet Page Number 52 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 ñ ñsll ll| }| Outlines expectations for the contractor, including specific restrictions and requirements as needed Development coordination with Maplewood and other project partner staff Ongoing throughout construction into pre-and post-operationsOverview and what to expect communications ahead of each construction seasonConstruction hotline and email accountDoor-knocking and flyeringresidents and businesses including individual business access maps Weekly Construction Progress meetings with Maplewood and other project partners ahead of construction activities Weekly Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) meetings with Maplewood and other project partners upcoming closures and detours ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ Construction Specification ProcessConstruction Communications and OutreachOngoing Coordination with agency partners throughout construction ¤¤¤16 Construction (2027-2029) Council Packet Page Number 53 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 θtǒƩƦƌĻ\[źƓĻ.w \[źǩ WƚƓĻƭ ǞźƷƷĻƩ /Ʃğźŭ \[ğƒƚƷŷĻ ΛЏЎЊΜ ЏЉЋΏЊВАБΛЏЎЊΜ ЏЉЋΏЊВАА tƩƚƆĻĭƷ ağƓğŭĻƩ ğƓķ Contact Us CƚƩ ƒƚƩĻ źƓŅƚƩƒğƷźƚƓʹ ĭƩğźŭ͵ƌğƒƚƷŷĻθƒĻƷƩƚƷƩğƓƭźƷ͵ƚƩŭ ĻƌźǩğĬĻƷŷ͵ƆƚƓĻƭθƒĻƷƩƚƷƩğƓƭźƷ͵ƚƩŭ CğĭĻĬƚƚƉ /ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ hǒƷƩĻğĭŷ ε 9ƓŭğŭĻƒĻƓƷ \[Ļğķ ǞǞǞ͵ƒĻƷƩƚƷƩğƓƭźƷ͵ƚƩŭΉƦǒƩƦƌĻΏƌźƓĻΏƦƩƚƆĻĭƷ 17 Council Packet Page Number 54 of 297 F5, Attachment 1 651-602-1955 Thank You! Purple Line BRT Project I}l=tlģ~l_t×r 18 Council Packet Page Number 55 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 MEMO Date: 08/06/2024 To:Mike Sable City of Maplewood Administrator From:Craig Lamothe Purple Line Project Manager nd RE: Responses to July 22Maplewood City Council Workshop Questions The following information has been assembled to respond to questions posed to the Purple Line project team during the July 22, 2024,Maplewood City Council workshop. These responses strive to be brief and succinct, but do reflect extensive technical analysis, design development and modeling. Additional detailed information is available on each of these topics if desired. Why the median? Is it necessary? Medians are commonly used in roadway design to separate functions (e.g. opposing directions of traffic, bikeway from general traffic, transitway from general traffic), manage turning movements on higher speed/higher volume roadways, or to provide a protected area in the middle of the roadway for signs/signals, landscaping or pedestrian refuges (a protected area to pause while crossing multiple lanes of traffic). Atintersections where left turn lanes are provided, mediansare used to define the left turn lane and clarify vehicle paths for drivers. Today on the Maplewood segment of White Bear Avenue, there are left turn medians at the Frost Ave andBurkeAve/YMCAservice entrance intersections. A longer median starting just south of Bleechers Bar & Grill continues through the TH 36 interchange north to the Hill Drive access to the Home Depot/Cub Foods retail area. This segment has curves and a number of driveways. The median in this segmentcontrols left turn movements into businesses, guides turning movements at intersections and guides drivers through this segment to improve safety in this area. A second longer median segment exists just north of County Road C to Beam Avenue to perform similar functions. Both the Side Running Concept and Center Running Concept as shown in the current layouts would addmedian (with breaks at intersections) where continuous medians do not exist today from Larpenteur to Bleechers (approximately 1 mile) and from Hill Drive to County Road C. 1 Council Packet Page Number 56 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ Regardless of whether or not Purple Line is constructed on White Bear Avenue, Ramsey County would continue to address access management through exploring the option of medians on White Bear Avenue to maintain/improve traffic flow and address safety concerns with future roadway improvement projects. The MnDOT County Road Safety Plan (CRSP) for Ramsey County identified access density over fifteen access points per mile as a risk factor for crashes. Based on this risk factor, the implementation of medians is one mitigation Ramsey County would consider to manage access and manage this risk. There are many segments of roadway along White Bear Avenue with more than eight access points per mile, so medians were shown as a mitigation that could be implemented with this project. The ultimate location and configuration of these medians would be determined during the advancement and completion of preliminary design. Medians are shown in both concepts as they would improve traffic flow for both general traffic and bus operations as well as reduce risk of vehicle crashes. The addition of Purple Line BRT jl ltl ~ljt_ l l. However, medians would be r} lh~~ljlj in the Center Running Concept to eliminate the crash risk of left turning vehicles with buses coming up behind them on the left. Medians would also be required at station areas. Purple Line concepts are currently at a very high level of concept design (about 1% as opposed to 100% plans needed for construction). Locations and types of medians needed for the project can continue to be determined in consultation with Ramsey County (the agency with roadway responsibility), the City of Maplewood and Metro Transit as the roadway design develops through 15%, 30%, 60%, 90% and 100% design plans. What happens if no median? In the Side Running Concept, with no medians at all, it is likely that efficiency of traffic flow would decrease and crashes would increase. If medians would be restricted to those areas were medians are present today, those issues would likely appear only in the areas without medians. In the Center Running Concept, the safety risk presented without medians as described above would rise to the level that professional engineers would strongly recommend against implementation of the concept, possibly to the level that they would refuse to sign the plans. Also, pedestrian refuges could not be provided at the following locations with fairly significant pedestrian crossings: White Bear/Gervais - 240 crossings daily; White Bear/Lydia - 165 crossings daily; and White Bear/County Rd B - 135 crossings daily. Ultimately the decision about where/how to provide medians in any condition would rest with Ramsey County as the owner of the road and will be reviewed as design progresses. 6~_h gtll _j s~ll ñ h~_t tjlähll All properties along White Bear Avenue are anticipated to have some impacts along the curb line of their properties during construction. 2϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 57 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Twelveproperties in the Side Running Concept are expected to have a greater than minor impact, but not significantly impacted that the business or residence would not be able to function resulting in a full property acquisition. The Center Running Concept would impact an _jjtt_}twelve businesses and of these,onecould result in full acquisition due to potential parking impacts. However, the owner has indicated there likely is a path to providing parking elsewhere on the site avoiding the need for acquisition. These property impacts result largely from additional roadway width for stations and turn lanes at intersections rather than medians. Figure 1: Property Impacts in Maplewood O_qqth jtlt ñsl ll t ht ñsll t}} jtl rÞ With the changes in roadway capacity on White Bear Avenue that would occur as part of the project, it is anticipated that some traffic on White Bear Avenue will divert to alternative routes. Because both the center running and side running options result in the same lane reductions, the forecasted change in traffic volumes is anticipated to be similar or the same. The graphic in Appendix Ashows the forecasted daily traffic levelsin 2045along White Bear Avenue and other roadwayswithout Purple Lineas well asthe corresponding change in traffic levels with Purple Line. It should be noted that only key roadways that are expected to change by at least 200 vehicles per day are shown on the map. The main diversion routes that will see increases in traffic volumes include I-35E, US 61, McKnight Road, Century Avenue, and Saint Paul Road. Some east-west roadways would also see an increase in traffic (e.g. BeamAvenue and Larpenteur Avenue). Impacts from traffic diversion to local streets 3 Council Packet Page Number 58 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ will be moderated through the use of medians along the corridor to prevent left-turns to/from these streets. Projections per stop (Northbound and Southbound) WBA vs BV The Purple Line project team uses the Federal Transit Administration's Simplified Trips On Project Software (STOPS) tool to predict ridership because it provides reliable ridership forecasts essential for planning and securing funding. STOPS calculates ridership by integrating population and employment data from the Census, local long range land use plans, existing transit ridership, and regional surveys asking residents about their travel choices. This data helps predict how many people will use the new or improved transit service. The project team used the STOPS model to provide an estimate for both the current year (2023), which is the present time, and the horizon year (2045), which aligns with local long range land use plans and reflects long term changes to ridership. The horizon year forecast includes changes in land use, such as new housing and commercial developments, and changes in the transit network, like new routes and services. The model gives an estimate of boardings, to measure how many trips are anticipated on the new service. The maps in Appendix B illustrate where the STOPS model anticipates Purple Line trips will start (producers) and where they will end (attractors). Each dot represents an approximate density of activity and may not represent actual start/end locations. Note that while many trips begin and end on the Purple Line corridor (or a walkable/bike-able distance from the corridor) others may begin or end a great distance away. These are trips that use other transit services, park and ride facilities, or sl __t ~jl glrt lj slt t ñ g _}} l sl I}l =tl q ~l t q their trip. The table below provides a breakdown of the current year and horizon year ridership estimates for the Bruce Vento Regional Trail Colocation and White Bear Avenue Reconstruction route alternatives by station. Because the model estimates boardings, these numbers for each station locations reflect only how many passengers are anticipate to board at that station location. These numbers do not reflect how many passengers are exiting buses at that location. However, if a passenger boards the bus for a return trip at that location later in the day, that is captured in the number as a separate trip. Note that at the Maplewood stations there is not a significant difference in the trips estimated for the current year versus the horizon year. That is because long range land use plans due not anticipate significant changes in land use from what is there today. Should land use plans intensify in these station areas, greater ridership could be anticipated. 4϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 59 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ Table 1: Current Year and Horizon Year Ridership Estimates Bruce Vento White Bear Avenue Corridor Regional Trail Reconstruction Route Alternative Colocation Route Alternative Center Running Side Running Current Horizon Current Horizon Current Horizon Year Year Year Year Year Year Station Community (2023) (2045) (2023) (2045) (2023) (2045) 150 325 175 400 150 325 Union Depot 5th & 6th St 325 350 400 425 300 350 10th St 300 350 400 475 375 425 14th St (Region's & Green Line) 450 475 725 500 575 450 Mt. Airy St 125 100 200 150 150 125 Olive St 50 100 100 100 75 100 Cayuga St 125 125 150 175 125 150 Payne Ave 200 225 275 325 250 275 St. Paul Arcade St 200 250 225 250 200 225 Cook Ave 50 100 100 100 75 100 Maryland Ave 400 400 Clarence St 325 275 325 275 Hazelwood St / Maryland Ave 125 150 100 125 White Bear Ave / Maryland Ave 225 225 200 200 Arlington Ave 50 50 50 50 Idaho Ave 150 175 125 150 Larpenteur Ave St. Paul / Maplewood 50 75 75 100 50 50 50 50 Frost Ave Co. Rd. B 100 150 75 125 Hwy 36 50 75 11th & Gervais Ave 175 225 150 200 Co. Rd. C 75 75 50 75 Radatz Ave 100 125 100 100 Maplewood Hazelwood / Beam (St. John's Hospital) 75 75 Maplewood Mall Transit Center 575 750 475 500 450 475 Hazelwood/ St. John's Blvd éM× ;sù 5t_}ê 25 50 25 50 Co. Rd. D 75 75 50 75 PROJECT TOTAL 3,200 3,875 4,700 5,025 4,025 4,475 5϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 60 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ End points ridership counts? Table 2: White Bear Ave Ridership Counts White Bear Ave Current Year Horizon Year Guideway Option Endpoint (2023) (2045) Center Running Maplewood Mall Transit Center 4,475 4,925 Side Running Maplewood Mall Transit Center 3,900 4,350 *ll Ltr * Lj , ä M× ;sù 5t_} «Ø®§§ ¬Ø§©¬ Mtjl Ltr * Lj , ä M× ;sù 5t_} «Ø§©¬ «Ø«®¬ 5 ~_ t M I_} >_}lj ñ tjlst zlht t l_hs htÞ See Table 1. Stop difference between BV and WB? The Bruce Vento Trail Colocation Corridor Route has 17 stations, and the White Bear Ave Corridor Reconstruction Route Alternative has 24 stations (16 in St. Paul and 8 in Maplewood). Bruce Vento Regional Trail Colocation Route Alternative stations located in Maplewood include: Larpenteur Ave Frost Ave Hwy 36 5_l}jä)l_~ éM× ;sù 5t_}ê Maplewood Mall Transit Center White Bear Avenue Corridor Reconstruction Route Alternative stations located in Maplewood include: Larpenteur Frost Ave Co. Rd. B Hwy 36 th 11 & Gervais Ave Co. Rd C Radatz Ave Maplewood Mall Transit Center 5_l}jäM× ;sù )}j éM× ;sù 5t_}ê Co. Rd. D 6϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 61 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 What is the cost of micro service in the North End/Mall District? Metro Transit micro is a shared ride service using ADA-accessible mini-buses. Each trip may be shared with multiple customers may be picked up or dropped off anywhere within the service area. Micro service is a new service for Metro Transit who is conducting a 24-month test program in North Minneapolis. Service is provided seven days a week from early morning until late evening. Fares range from $1 to $3.25. Network Now draft concept plan identifiesservice improvements for 2025-2027 includingthe creation of additional micro zonesincluding l lttlj lh~_tr >_}ljù ?s EndDistrict. Operating costs for each microtransit zone is anticipated to be $1.5 million annually. Figure 2:Comparisonof anticipated regional subsidy required for microtransit versus BRT service For more information aboutMetro Transit micro, go tometrotransit.org/micro. Figure 3: Metro Transit microtransit vehicle interior 7 Council Packet Page Number 62 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ *l V) O_qqth h _j lljÞ .t~_lj V) _qqth h _j llj ñ ts detail Daily traffic volumes on White Bear Avenue range from around 17,000 vehicles per day near Larpenteur Avenue up to 23,300 vehicles per day just north of TH 36. The traffic volumes during the morning and evening peak periods at intersections along the White Bear Avenue corridor can be found in the exhibit at the end of this memo. Intersection Level traffic counts collected in 2023 are shown on the maps in Appendix C. These maps show the counted for each movement of each leg of the intersection during both the morning and afternoon peak hour of traffic. Speed data was not collected along White Bear Avenue as part of the Purple Line project. However, Ramsey County completed an evaluation of all undivided four-lane roadways in the County in 2020. This evaluation included collecting speed estimates along White Bear Avenue in Maplewood. Based on this study, prevailing speeds in the corridor were determined to range between 40-42 mph south of TH 36 which has a posted speed of 35 mph. North of TH 36, which has a posted speed limit of 40 mph, prevailing speeds in the corridor were around 41 mph. As discussed previously, estimated changes in daily traffic volumes due to Purple Line along White Bear Avenue are summarized in the graphic found in Appendix A. In general, daily traffic volume are expected to decrease between 5% and 8%. Traffic speeds along the corridor are also anticipated to experience some decrease with the Purple Line project due to changes in roadway characteristics (e.g. fewer lanes for general traffic). How to remove snow in each scenario? Snow removal with a center median would not change from how it is done today. In the sections where the exclusive guideway is proposed, the medians separating the bus guideway from general traffic lanes are short segments-- half mile or less. Plowing these could be similar to plowing bridges or overpasses on highways today where the snow cannot be dumped below. The exact process will be discussed and determined by County and Metro Transit engineers during the design phase and documented in agreements. Vsll h_ ltjl }lq ñ s ~_ }lqïs_j _l l}t~t_ljÞ Left turns would be allowed at signalized intersections under both design concepts: Larpenteur Ave, Ripley Ave, Frost Ave, County Road B, Cope Ave, Highway 36 ramps, Hill Dr, Gervais Ave, County Road C, and Beam Ave. Left turns would be prohibited at these local roadways under both concepts: North St Paul Road, Burke Ave, Messabi Ave (east leg only; at the west leg left turns are already prohibited). Additional left turns under the Center Running Concept only would be prohibited at Van Dyke, E Kohlman Ave, Radatz Ave. 8϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 63 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ Of the 52 business driveways along White Bear Avenue in Maplewood, left turns are _}}lj _ } ªª j_. The Side Running Concept would close all 33 remaining driveways to left turns. The Center Running Concept would physically close only 30 of the 33 due to physical constraints but left turns would not be recommended at those remaining locations. Of the 38 residential driveways along White Bear Avenue in Maplewood, left turns are _}}lj _ } ª¨ j_. The Side Running Concept would close 30 of the 31 remaining driveways to left turns. The Center Running Concept would physically close only 25 of the 31 due to physical constraints but left turns would not be recommended at those remaining locations. Again, these conditions reflect only a high level of concept engineering (1%); access will be given further consideration as design progresses. 5 _l *>* l l_lj ñ _l sl gtjtrÞ Per the committee charter, the METRO Purple Line BRT Project Corridor Management Committee (CMC) advises the Metropolitan Council, the federal grantee and eventual owner/operator, and Ramsey County, the local funding partner, on the design and construction of the project. The CMC will utilize technical and communityinput to address issues relating to project development, engineering, final design and construction.While the CMC is anticipated to make the most of its recommendations on a consensus basis, as needed the committee will cast votes on key recommendations.However, as an advisory body, the votes of the CMC do not bind the Metropolitan Council or Ramsey County to any final capital or operating budget decisions but establishes an input process for project decisions. Feedback from other project committees (TAC, CBAC) help to inform CMC actions. 9϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 64 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ How do Emergency Vehicles enter into center-running lane in an emergency response? ! th_} ~ljt_ }j gl gjlj g _ ÷ curb, but where emergency vehicles would be anticipated to cross the median a ~_g}l hg with lower height and more gradual slopes could be provided. Those locations would be determined in coordination with City and County emergency services at future stages of design. Operational protocols for how Metro Transit buses respond to emergency vehicles in the transitway would be determined in consultation with emergency services and included as part of bus driver training. Typically bus operators would be instructed to stop and remain in their position with their flashers on until emergency vehicles have passed. Emergency vehicles would be able to access signal preemption while in the transitway. During future stages of the project, agreements will be put in place addressing emergency vehicle use and other operating protocol and would be documented in agreements. To inform the development of procedures for Purple Line BRT Operations, Metro Transit will use existing procedures as well as look to other transit systems, such as IndyGo in Indianapolis, Indiana who has developed emergency vehicle interaction procedures for their Red Line BRT Operations. 10϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 65 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ Lane width in center-running (vehicle breakdowns and traffic stops for speeding)? What is the shoulder width? Figure 7: Purple Line Center-Running Cross Sections General vehicle lane width is anticipated to vary between 12.5 to 16 feet depending on conditions throughout the corridor. Generally, lane width at the concept level for this concept was developed to minimize property impacts. Wider lane widths may be possible and could be explored at future stages of design but would likely increase property impacts. The design concepts include curb and gutter to facilitate collection of stormwater and therefore do th}jl _ ös}jl÷× Osl }_l tjs tjth_lj _gl th}jl sl rl _ ésl _l_ q concrete that extends from the vertical curb into the roadway). What is the full reconstruction for Beam and what are the implications? Full reconstruction of Beam Avenue is one concept under consideration and would include: relocation of utilities as needed; replacement of the roadway base; new pavement; new curb, gutter and sidewalk; new lighting; new landscaping; replacement of signals and signal systems as needed; appropriate lane markings and signage. Full reconstruction of Beam may not be necessary for Purple Line operation and could reduce construction costs in this segment up to 50%. Beyond costs, the current reconstruction concepts largely fall within the right of way and would not result in property impacts. 11϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 66 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ What is the Ramsey County traffic engineer estimate of level of service on roadway and intersections on WB from Larpenteur to Beam? Detailed traffic study results for each study intersection along White Bear Avenue in Maplewood under Existing conditions, 2045 No-Build conditions (No Purple Line), and the 2045 Build conditions (for both center running and side running options) can be found at the back of this memo. Level of Mlthl é=AMê r_jlØ _tq _j h_lrtl _ jtlù jth~qØ q_tØ ql} h~tØ and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control and resulting traffic queuing. The table below provides a description of each LOS rating. Table 4: Level of Service Descriptions Level of Service Description A Minimal delay B Minor delay C Moderate delay D Considerable delay E High delay F Extremely high delay LOS D/E is considered to be the threshold of acceptable operations for an intersection in an urban or suburban area during peak hours. Appendix D provides tables showing LOS analysis for the AM Peak Period under Existing Conditions, the PM Peak Period under Existing Conditions, AM Peak Period under (future 2045) No Build (no Purple Line) Conditions, the PM Peak Period under (future 2045) No Build (no Purple Line) Conditions, AM Peak Period under (future 2045) Center Running Build Conditions, the PM Peak Period under Center Running Build Conditions, AM Peak Period under (future 2045) Side Running Build Conditions, and the PM Peak Period under (future 2045) Side Running Build Conditions, The traffic study showed minimal difference between Existing conditions and 2045 No-Build conditions for overall intersection LOS, largely due to the excess capacity that exists on the roadway today. When comparing the center running and side running options in 2045, while both show reductions in LOS along the corridor, the center running option is expected to see more significant levels of congestion than the side running option. To illustrate this trend, LOS during the evening peak hour (generally the worst hour of the day) at five Maplewood intersections under all four scenarios are shown in the table below. 12϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 67 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ Table 5: Level of Service in PM Peak Hour in Maplewood 2045 Intersection Existing Center Side No-Build Running Running White Bear/Frost A A C B White Bear/TH 36 Eastbound B B D B White Bear/Gervais-11th B B C C White Bear/County Road C B B E C White Bear/Beam C C D D 13϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 68 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ Appendix A ϶ Council Packet Page Number 69 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶϶ Council Packet Page Number 70 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ Appendix B ϶ Council Packet Page Number 71 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ .t~_lj t jlt_t g_lj lttr _t l~ } I}l =tl× ϶ ϶ Council Packet Page Number 72 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ .t~_lj t trt g_lj lttr _t l~ } I}l =tl× ϶϶ Council Packet Page Number 73 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ Appendix C ϶ Council Packet Page Number 74 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 OPU!UP!TDBMF Ijmm!Esjwf UI!47!XC UI!47!FC Dpqf!Bwfovf Dpvouz!Spbe!C Gsptu!Bwfovf Sjqmfz!Bwfovf Mbsqfoufvs!Bwfovf BN!)QN*!Qfbl!Ipvs! Council Packet Page Number 75 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Cfbn!Bwfovf Sbebu{!Bwfovf Dpvouz!Spbe!D Izwff!Tipqqjoh!Dfoufs BN!)QN*!Qfbl!Ipvs! Council Packet Page Number 76 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 ϶ ϶ Appendix D ϶ Council Packet Page Number 77 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Existing AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement A (9.3) NBL NB B (12.5) NBT B (12.8) B (10.9) NBR SBL B (12.0) A (9.6) SB A (9.2) SBT SBR A (6.1) White Bear Ave & 17 C (33.3) EBL Larpenteur Ave EB C (34.0) EBTD (42.1) A (7.3) EBR WBL C (31.8) C (31.1) WB WBTD (39.1) WBR C (23.8) B (18.0) Intersection NBT C (19.8) NB C (19.6) C (18.1) NBR White Bear Ave & St 18SB A (0.5) SBT A (0.4) Paul Rd B (11.7) WB A (8.5) WBR Intersection B (11.9) A (1.8) NBT A (1.8) NB NBR A (1.1) A (5.4) SBL A (2.0) SB White Bear Ave & 19 SBT A (1.4) Ripley Ave WBLE (65.8) B (10.9) WB WBR A (7.6) A (2.5) Intersection NBL A (6.2) A (2.9) NB A (2.4) NBT NBR A (2.2) A (5.2) SBL SB A (3.1) SBT A (3.0) A (3.0) SBR White Bear Ave & Frost 20 EBLD (48.9) Ave C (25.6) EB EBTD (44.8) EBR A (7.7) WBLD (41.8) WB C (26.2) WBTD (53.6) A (9.1) WBR Intersection A (5.2) Council Packet Page Number 78 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Existing AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement B (10.5) NBL A (8.6) NB A (8.6) NBT NBR A (6.3) B (11.4) SBL SB A (6.6) SBT A (5.7) A (4.8) SBR White Bear Ave & 21 EBLD (45.1) County Road B EBD (35.7) EBTD (36.7) EBR B (16.4) WBLD (38.6) WB C (33.1) WBTD (40.4) C (22.4) WBR Intersection B (12.7) A (9.0) NBL NB A (6.2) NBT A (5.9) A (5.1) NBR SBL A (8.0) A (3.9) SB A (4.0) SBT SBR A (1.9) White Bear Ave & Cope 22 EBLD (46.3) Ave EB C (33.5) EBTD (48.8) EBR A (1.6) WBLD (51.0) B (13.7) WB WBTD (54.4) WBR A (1.8) A (7.3) Intersection NBT A (3.4) NB A (3.2) A (2.4) NBR SBL A (6.0) A (2.4) SB White Bear Ave & 23 A (2.0) SBT Highway 36 EB EBLD (48.2) EB C (25.1) B (12.4) EBR Intersection A (8.7) A (7.4) NBL A (4.0) NB NBT A (2.0) B (10.7) SBT A (9.5) SB White Bear Ave & 24 SBR A (6.4) Highway 36 WB WBLD (47.6) C (26.9) WB WBR A (7.7) A (9.2) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 79 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Existing AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement A (2.0) NBT NB A (2.2) A (3.0) NBR SBL A (5.9) SB A (3.0) White Bear Ave & Hill 25 A (2.8) SBT Ave WBLD (47.8) WB C (33.3) A (5.8) WBR Intersection A (5.8) A (8.9) NBL NB A (6.4) NBT A (5.9) A (6.4) NBR SBL A (7.7) A (5.6) SB A (5.3) SBT SBR A (4.0) White Bear Ave & 11th 26 EBLD (51.5) Ave EB C (29.5) EBTD (48.8) B (17.2) EBR WBLD (50.3) C (33.3) WB WBTD (49.1) WBR A (7.0) B (11.8) Intersection NBL A (3.9) A (1.1) NB A (0.9) NBT NBR A (1.2) A (6.2) SBL SB A (2.2) SBT A (2.1) A (2.3) SBR White Bear Ave & 27 Hyvee Shopping Center EBLE (58.4) EBD (36.7) EBTE (58.3) EBR B (19.7) A (0.7) WBL A (3.3) WB WBR A (7.6) A (3.3) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 80 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Existing AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement A (4.4) NBL A (3.2) NB A (3.1) NBT NBR A (3.0) A (6.2) SBL SB A (5.8) SBT A (5.8) A (5.3) SBR White Bear Ave & 28 EBL C (34.3) County Road C C (25.4) EB EBTD (48.0) EBR A (6.4) WBLD (43.3) WB C (31.4) WBTD (47.6) A (5.9) WBR Intersection A (9.1) A (3.7) NBL NB A (1.2) NBT A (1.1) A (1.6) NBR SBL A (3.6) A (0.7) SB A (0.6) SBT White Bear Ave & 29 SBR A (1.2) Radatz Ave A (7.5) EBL A (6.9) EB EBR A (6.8) A (8.9) WBL A (7.6) WB WBR A (6.5) A (1.3) Intersection NBLD (41.6) C (20.2) NB B (13.2) NBT NBR A (2.6) SBLD (42.1) SB B (19.1) SBT B (17.4) A (6.8) SBR White Bear Ave & Beam 30 EBLD (42.6) Ave C (20.2) EB C (34.5) EBT EBR A (1.2) WBLD (42.3) WB C (32.3) WBTD (37.0) A (8.3) WBR In C (21.1) tersection Council Packet Page Number 81 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Existing PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement B (16.5) NBL NB B (18.0) NBT B (18.2) B (17.4) NBR SBL B (15.7) B (12.9) SB B (12.5) SBT SBR B (10.4) White Bear Ave & 17 EBLD (35.8) Larpenteur Ave EBD (38.3) EBTD (45.7) B (17.7) EBR WBL C (33.6) C (34.8) WB WBTD (44.9) WBR C (27.3) C (21.4) Intersection NBTD (27.6) NBD (27.8) NBRD (29.3) White Bear Ave & St 18SB A (1.0) SBT A (0.8) Paul Rd B (14.2) WB A (8.4) WBR Intersection B (15.4) A (1.7) NBT A (1.6) NB NBR A (1.1) A (8.8) SBL A (2.5) SB White Bear Ave & 19 SBT A (1.7) Ripley Ave WBLD (53.9) B (14.8) WB WBR A (9.0) A (2.7) Intersection NBL B (10.3) A (3.7) NB A (2.9) NBT NBR A (2.6) A (6.8) SBL SB A (3.6) SBT A (3.6) A (3.9) SBR White Bear Ave & Frost 20 EBLD (52.9) Ave C (25.6) EB EBTE (57.5) EBR B (10.6) WBLD (44.4) C (27.4) WB WBTE (66.8) B (11.2) WBR Intersection A (6.1) Council Packet Page Number 82 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Existing PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement B (15.4) NBL B (11.3) NB B (11.2) NBT NBR A (9.6) C (21.6) SBL SB B (10.8) SBT A (9.5) B (10.1) SBR White Bear Ave & 21 EBLD (39.8) County Road B EBD (38.8) EBTD (43.7) EBR C (26.7) WBLD (39.8) WBD (35.4) WBTD (45.0) C (24.0) WBR Intersection B (15.4) B (15.4) NBL NB A (6.7) NBT A (6.1) A (5.5) NBR SBL B (11.7) A (4.5) SB A (4.4) SBT SBR A (3.4) White Bear Ave & Cope 22 EBLD (50.5) Ave EBD (38.9) EBTD (53.7) EBR A (2.6) WBLE (58.3) B (12.3) WB WBTD (52.8) WBR A (4.7) A (9.1) Intersection NBT B (12.1) NB B (11.0) A (5.4) NBR SBL C (21.8) SB A (8.3) A (6.0) SBT White Bear Ave & 23 Highway 36 EB EBLD (41.2) C (28.1) EB C (32.2) EBT EBR B (16.2) B (14.1) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 83 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Existing PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement B (13.5) NBL NB A (4.3) A (1.6) NBT SBT A (8.0) SB A (7.0) White Bear Ave & 24 A (4.1) SBR Highway 36 WB WBLD (52.4) WB C (30.8) B (12.5) WBR Intersection A (7.9) A (3.4) NBT A (3.7) NB NBR A (4.8) B (11.4) SBL A (5.0) SB White Bear Ave & Hill 25 SBT A (4.5) Ave WBLD (49.4) WBD (36.9) WBR A (9.1) A (8.4) Intersection NBL B (12.5) A (9. NB 1) A (8.8) NBT NBR A (6.6) C (21.4) SBL SB B (15.8) SBT B (14.7) B (14.3) SBR White Bear Ave & 11th 26 EBLD (52.0) Ave C (32.8) EB EBTD (50.7) EBR C (21.1) WBLE (65.7) WBD (37.9) WBTD (50.1) A (9.8) WBR Intersection B (17.4) A (10.0) NBL NB A (2.2) NBT A (1.5) A (2.0) NBR SBL A (10.0) A (4.5) SB A (4.5) SBT SBR A (4.5) White Bear Ave & 27 EBLE (62.6) Hyvee Shopping Center EBD (39.8) EBTD (50.6) C (23.0) EBR WBLD (50.4) WBD (41.3) WBTD (54.7) WBR C (21.7) A (7.5) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 84 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Existing PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement B (12.0) NBL A (6.6) NB A (6.0) NBT NBR A (6.7) B (15.3) SBL SB A (7.9) SBT A (7.1) A (8.7) SBR White Bear Ave & 28 EBLD (45.2) County Road C C (28.2) EB EBTD (47.5) EBR A (9.2) WBLD (52.1) WB C (33.0) WBTD (44.9) A (6.8) WBR Intersection B (11.5) A (8.8) NBL NB A (3.1) NBT A (3.0) A (3.2) NBR SBL A (6.9) A (1.3) SB A (1.1) SBT White Bear Ave & 29 SBR A (1.8) Radatz Ave A (7.2) EBL A (7.0) EB EBR A (6.5) C (17.2) WBL B (12.6) WB WBR A (7.9) A (2.4) Intersection NBLE (58.7) C (27.8) NB B (16.4) NBT NBR A (7.8) SBLE (57.7) SB C (22.0) SBT C (20.5) A (8.3) SBR White Bear Ave & Beam 30 EBLD (53.5) Ave C (29.1) EB EBTD (47.7) EBR A (3.0) WBLE (56.3) WBD (42.9) WBTD (49.2) B (17.4) WBR In C (27.8) tersection Council Packet Page Number 85 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | No-Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement B (11.7) NBL B (14.1) NB NBT B (14.4) B (12.0) NBR B (12.4) SBL SB B (10.1) SBT A (9.7) A (6.8) SBR White Bear Ave & 17 EBL C (34.5) Larpenteur Ave C (33.2) EB EBTD (39.7) EBR A (6.0) C (31.4) WBL WB C (27.3) WBTD (44.1) A (7.8) WBR Intersection B (18.3) C (17.2) NBT NB C (17.5) NBR C (19.4) White Bear Ave & St A (0.5) 18SB A (0.4) SBT Paul Rd WB B (14.4) WBR A (8.8) B (10.9) Intersection NBT A (1.3) A (1.3) NB A (0.5) NBR SBL A (6.3) A (2.2) SB White Bear Ave & 19 A (1.4) SBT Ripley Ave WBLD (50.4) B (10.4) WB A (8.6) WBR Intersection A (2.5) A (7.5) NBL NB A (3.5) NBT A (2.8) A (4.3) NBR SBL A (7.2) A (3.5) SB A (3.4) SBT SBR A (3.7) White Bear Ave & 20 EBLD (47.9) Frost Ave EB C (24.1) EBTD (50.6) A (8.3) EBR WBLD (39.4) C (24.7) WB WBTD (48.0) WBR A (9.6) A (5.9) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 86 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | No-Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement A (10.0) NBL NB A (9.9) NBT A (9.9) A (8.7) NBR SBL B (12.2) A (7.0) SB A (6.0) SBT SBR A (5.1) White Bear Ave & 21 EBLD (43.4) County Road B EBD (36.0) EBTD (38.1) B (17.2) EBR WBLD (41.2) WBD (35.6) WBTD (44.0) WBR C (24.1) B (14.1) Intersection NBL A (9.4) A (7.0) NB A (6.9) NBT NBR A (5.3) A (7.8) SBL SB A (4.1) SBT A (4.2) A (2.5) SBR White Bear Ave & 22 EBLD (43.7) Cope Ave C (33.3) EB EBTD (45.8) EBR A (1.7) WBLE (58.8) WB B (14.2) WBTD (52.7) A (2.1) WBR Intersection A (7.9) A (4.4) NBT NB A (4.2) NBR A (3.0) A (7.9) SBL SB A (3.0) SBT A (2.4) White Bear Ave & 23 Highway 36 EB EBLD (46.4) EB C (26.7) EBTE (55.1) B (15.3) EBR Intersection B (10.1) Council Packet Page Number 87 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | No-Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement A (9.7) NBL NB A (4.9) NBT A (2.0) B (11.1) SBT SB B (10.3) SBR A (8.2) White Bear Ave & 24 Highway 36 WB WBLD (46.9) WB C (26.5) WBTD (46.7) A (8.2) WBR Intersection A (9.7) A (2.2) NBT NB A (2.4) NBR A (3.2) A (6.1) SBL SB A (3.2) White Bear Ave & Hill 25 SBT A (3.0) Ave WBLD (48.9) WB C (34.7) WBR A (7.0) A (6.1) Intersection NBL A (8.1) A (6.5) NB A (6.4) NBT NBR A (5.4) B (10.4) SBL SB A (7.8) SBT A (7.3) A (5.6) SBR White Bear Ave & 11th 26 EBLD (49.4) Ave C (28.1) EB EBTD (48.6) EBR B (16.1) WBLD (52.5) WB C (33.8) WBTD (39.4) A (7.2) WBR Intersection B (12.5) A (4.9) NBL NB A (1.3) NBT A (1.0) A (1.5) NBR SBL A (5.1) A (2.8) SB A (2.7) SBT SBR A (2.8) White Bear Ave & 27Hyvee Shopping EBLE (59.9) Center EBD (37.6) EBTE (56.4) C (20.2) EBR WBL A (3.9) C (24.7) WB WBTE (57.4) WBR B (11.4) A (4.1) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 88 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | No-Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement A (6.0) NBL NB A (3.7) NBT A (3.5) A (3.2) NBR SBL A (8.5) A (7.3) SB A (7.3) SBT SBR A (6.7) White Bear Ave & 28 EBLD (43.8) County Road C EB C (26.4) EBTD (40.4) A (6.6) EBR WBLD (48.2) C (31.7) WB WBTD (44.9) WBR A (6.0) B (10.4) Intersection NBL A (4.1) A (1.4) NB A (1.2) NBT NBR A (2.2) A (4.0) SBL SB A (0.9) SBT A (0.8) White Bear Ave & 29 A (1.1) SBR Radatz Ave EBL A (7.6) A (7.4) EB A (7.3) EBR WBL B (10.5) A (8.3) WB A (6.7) WBR Intersection A (1.5) NBLD (43.1) NB C (21.3) NBT B (15.1) A (3.0) NBR SBLD (45.8) C (21.4) SB B (19.9) SBT SBR A (7.3) White Bear Ave & 30 EBLD (41.2) Beam Ave EB C (20.4) EBT C (34.1) A (1.6) EBR WBLD (40.0) WB C (31.2) WBTD (36.9) WBR A (7.8) Intersection C (22.2) Council Packet Page Number 89 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | No-Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBL B (19.2) NB B (19.0) B (19.3) NBT B (16.8) NBR SBL B (19.5) B (14.2) SB B (13.1) SBT SBR B (11.4) White Bear Ave & 17 EBLD (38.4) Larpenteur Ave EBD (39.1) EBTD (46.4) A (7.0) EBR WBLD (35.6) C (30.7) WB WBTD (48.1) WBR A (9.5) C (22.2) Intersection NBTD (27.7) NBD (27.8) NBRD (28.8) White Bear Ave & St 18SB A (1.1) SBT A (0.8) Paul Rd C (17.9) WB A (8.9) WBR Intersection B (15.7) A (1.7) NBT NB A (1.7) NBR A (1.4) B (10.7) SBL SB A (3.1) White Bear Ave & 19 SBT A (2.0) Ripley Ave WBLE (60.9) WB B (15.1) WBR B (10.2) A (3.2) Intersection NBL B (12.8) A (5. NB 1) A (3.9) NBT NBR A (3.6) A (6.3) SBL SB A (4.0) SBT A (4.0) A (3.9) SBR White Bear Ave & Frost 20 EBLD (52.2) Ave C (25.0) EB EBTE (56.9) EBR B (11.4) WBLD (47.5) WB C (28.0) WBTD (43.1) B (12.2) WBR Intersection A (7.1) Council Packet Page Number 90 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | No-Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement B (19.5) NBL B (13.2) NB B (13.1) NBT NBR B (11.6) C (23.3) SBL SB B (12.5) SBT B (11.3) A (9.8) SBR White Bear Ave & 21 EBLD (38.8) County Road B EBD (37.0) EBTD (41.2) EBR C (23.7) WBLD (38.0) WBD (35.0) WBTD (43.8) C (25.8) WBR Intersection B (17.0) B (16.9) NBL NB A (8.8) NBT A (8.3) A (7.4) NBR SBL B (15.0) A (5.5) SB A (5.2) SBT SBR A (4.7) White Bear Ave & Cope 22 EBLD (47.8) Ave EBD (38.5) EBTD (54.3) A (2.8) EBR WBLE (59.1) B (16.1) WB WBTD (53.2) WBR A (7.6) B (10.6) Intersection NBT B (13.9) B (12.7) NB A (5.7) NBR SBL C (27.9) A (9.8) SB A (6.7) SBT White Bear Ave & 23 Highway 36 EB EBLD (43.1) C (32.3) EB EBTD (44.8) EBR C (22.1) B (16.6) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 91 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | No-Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement B (17.0) NBL A (5.1) NB A (1.7) NBT SBT A (9.1) A (7.7) SB A (4.0) SBR White Bear Ave & 24 Highway 36 WB WBLD (54.2) C (33.1) WB WBTD (48.0) WBR B (15.1) A (8.7) Intersection NBT A (4.2) A (4.6) NB A (5.8) NBR SBL B (15.7) A (5.6) SB White Bear Ave & Hill 25 A (4.8) SBT Ave WBLD (51.8) WBD (38.7) A (10.0) WBR Intersection A (9.1) B (14.6) NBL NB A (9.5) NBT A (9.0) A (7.2) NBR SBL C (25.3) B (17.0) SB B (15.4) SBT SBR B (13.3) White Bear Ave & 11th 26 EBLD (50.2) Ave EB C (34.4) EBTD (51.6) C (23.8) EBR WBLF (96.2) WBD (52.2) WBTD (48.9) WBR A (10.0) B (19.7) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 92 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | No-Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement B (12.5) NBL A (2.4) NB A (1.5) NBT NBR A (2.5) B (11.7) SBL SB A (5.5) SBT A (5.4) A (5.6) SBR White Bear Ave & 27Hyvee Shopping EBLE (62.0) Center EBD (43.1) EBTD (46.6) EBR C (25.9) WBLD (45.7) WBD (40.0) WBTE (56.0) C (26.2) WBR Intersection A (8.3) B (14.4) NBL NB A (7.9) NBT A (7.2) A (8.7) NBR SBL B (19.8) A (9.6) SB A (8.7) SBT SBR A (8.7) White Bear Ave & 28 EBLD (46.8) County Road C EB C (29.1) EBTD (47.3) A (9.3) EBR WBLD (52.6) C (32.8) WB WBTD (50.4) WBR A (7.9) B (12.9) Intersection NBL B (10.6) A (4.0) NB A (3.8) NBT NBR A (4.6) B (12.5) SBL SB A (1.5) SBT A (1.2) White Bear Ave & 29 A (1.8) SBR Radatz Ave EBL A (9.5) A (9. EB 0) A (7.7) EBR WBL C (22.8) C (15.9) WB B (11.1) WBR A (3.1) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 93 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | No-Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBLE (59.7) C (27.7) NB B (16.9) NBT NBR A (8.5) SBLE (61.2) SB C (22.9) SBT C (21.0) A (8.0) SBR White Bear Ave & 30 EBLE (56.4) Beam Ave C (29.8) EB EBTD (48.3) EBR A (2.9) WBLD (51.3) WBD (41.0) WBTD (49.3) B (18.9) WBR Intersection C (27.9) Council Packet Page Number 94 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Center Running Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBLE (67.2) NB C (23.3) C (20.9) NBT B (17.6) NBR SBLE (70.3) C (29.3) SB B (12.8) SBT SBR A (9.8) White Bear Ave & 17 C (33.2) EBL Larpenteur Ave EB C (34.6) EBTD (41.6) A (8.4) EBR WBL C (30.1) C (28.3) WB WBTD (42.2) WBR B (12.6) C (27.9) Intersection NBT A (0.9) A (1.2) NB A (3.6) NBR White Bear Ave & St 18SB A (1.0) SBT A (1.0) Paul Rd A (8.9) WB A (8.9) WBR Intersection A (1.2) A (7.7) NBT NB A (7.7) NBR A (2.4) SBLD (40.7) SB B (12.6) White Bear Ave & 19 SBT A (5.3) Ripley Ave WBLD (51.2) WB C (22.9) WBR A (6.5) B (11.6) Intersection NBLE (61.7) B (18.6) NB B (10.7) NBT NBR B (10.7) SBLE (74.2) SB B (16.2) SBT B (14.7) B (14.3) SBR White Bear Ave & Frost 20 EBLD (41.8) Ave C (22.4) EB EBTD (35.1) EBR B (10.5) WBLD (46.4) WB C (26.5) WBTD (43.4) A (9.6) WBR Intersection B (18.1) Council Packet Page Number 95 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Center Running Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBLE (67.9) C (20.6) NB B (18.6) NBT NBR B (18.4) SBLE (66.4) SBD (35.3) SBT C (27.8) C (28.3) SBR White Bear Ave & 21 EBLD (37.7) County Road B EBD (37.9) EBTD (42.4) EBR C (24.1) C (34.5) WBL WBD (35.8) WBTD (45.0) C (28.1) WBR Intersection C (29.8) NBLE (55.7) NB B (10.6) NBT A (7.0) A (4.3) NBR SBLE (62.6) B (12.3) SB A (9.8) SBT SBR A (2.4) White Bear Ave & Cope 22 EBLD (46.4) Ave EBD (36.7) EBTD (37.3) A (7.0) EBR WBLD (48.8) B (13.8) WB WBTD (42.4) WBR A (7.1) B (13.5) Intersection NBT B (16.8) B (15.7) NB A (7.6) NBR SBLD (51.7) B (13.6) SB A (9.4) SBT White Bear Ave & 23 Highway 36 EB EBLD (38.3) C (23.9) EB EBTD (41.9) EBR B (15.3) B (17.3) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 96 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Center Running Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement C (29.9) NBL B (13.6) NB A (3.2) NBT SBT B (17.9) B (14.3) SB A (6.4) SBR White Bear Ave & 24 Highway 36 WB WBLD (45.8) C (27.8) WB WBTD (42.9) WBR B (11.3) B (15.8) Intersection NBT B (10.2) A (9.9) NB A (7.6) NBR SBLD (50.6) A (5.4) SB White Bear Ave & Hill 25 A (1.9) SBT Ave WBLD (48.8) WBD (36.3) B (10.8) WBR Intersection B (11.1) NBLF (86.9) NB C (20.9) NBT A (7.8) A (6.5) NBR SBLE (55.4) C (23.9) SB B (17.0) SBT SBR B (14.3) White Bear Ave & 11th 26 C (34.2) EBL Ave EB C (25.4) EBTD (41.1) B (16.6) EBR WBLD (38.9) C (30.0) WB WBTD (38.0) WBR B (14.2) C (23.4) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 97 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Center Running Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBLE (66.2) A (6.3) NB A (1.3) NBT NBR A (1.1) SBLD (38.3) SB A (8.0) SBT A (7.8) A (7.5) SBR White Bear Ave & 27Hyvee Shopping EBLD (53.3) Center C (31.7) EB EBTD (49.8) EBR B (11.4) WBLE (57.0) WBD (52.3) WBTE (62.6) B (19.9) WBR Intersection A (8.8) NBLE (69.4) NB B (11.0) NBT A (5.1) A (4.4) NBR SBLE (61.6) B (19.6) SB B (14.2) SBT SBR B (11.1) White Bear Ave & 28 EBLD (43.9) County Road C EB C (29.2) EBTD (44.9) A (8.7) EBR WBLD (44.1) C (30.1) WB WBTD (43.2) WBR A (8.8) B (18.0) Intersection NBT A (3.8) A (3.8) NB A (3.7) NBR SBT A (0.9) A (0.9) SB White Bear Ave & 29 A (1.6) SBR Radatz Ave EB A (6.0) EBR A (6.0) A (9.4) WB A (9.4) WBR Intersection A (3.0) Council Packet Page Number 98 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Center Running Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBLE (73.1) C (25.7) NB C (22.0) NBT NBR A (6.7) SBLE (65.2) SB C (27.5) SBT C (21.5) C (22.7) SBR White Bear Ave & 30 EBLD (47.0) Beam Ave C (25.2) EB EBTD (48.0) EBR A (1.3) WBLD (44.7) WBD (43.3) WBTE (58.4) A (5.7) WBR Intersection C (29.4) Council Packet Page Number 99 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Center Running Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBLF (81.8) NBT C (32.4) NBD (36.2) NBR C (30.3) NBUF (87.0) SBLE (72.0) SBT C (25.0) SBD (35.6) SBR C (23.8) White Bear Ave & 17 SBUE (70.1) Larpenteur Ave EBLD (47.5) EBD (48.2) EBTD (53.7) EBR C (20.4) WBLD (54.3) WBD (45.9) WBTE (57.0) WBR C (27.3) IntersectionD (39.7) NBT A (1.8) NB A (2.2) NBR A (4.2) White Bear Ave & St 18SB A (5.0) SBT A (5.0) Paul Rd WB C (15.1) WBR C (15.1) Intersection A (3.6) NBT B (13.7) NB B (13.5) NBR A (6.8) SBLD (53.4) SB B (17.9) White Bear Ave & 19 SBT B (10.2) Ripley Ave WBLE (55.3) WB C (24.0) WBR A (7.3) Intersection B (16.5) NBLF (82.1) NB C (27.4) NBT B (17.6) NBR C (20.9) SBLF (87.8) SB C (29.7) SBT C (29.1) SBR C (28.7) White Bear Ave & Frost 20 EBLD (45.1) Ave EB C (29.1) EBTD (41.7) EBR C (21.3) WBLD (43.5) WB C (27.3) WBTD (48.0) WBR B (16.4) Intersection C (28.4) Council Packet Page Number 100 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Center Running Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBLF (113.6) NBE (64.1) NBTE (63.0) NBRE (55.6) SBLF (119.0) SBD (54.9) SBTD (45.5) SBRD (44.0) White Bear Ave & 21 EBLE (60.5) County Road B EBE (64.9) EBTE (70.2) EBRE (61.6) WBLD (48.5) WBD (50.3) WBTE (59.6) WBRD (43.5) IntersectionE (58.8) NBLE (78.7) D (36.9) NB NBT C (34.6) NBR C (23.6) SBLE (59.8) SB C (22.7) SBT C (23.7) SBR B (10.7) Whit e Bear Ave & Cope 22 EBLF (318.2) Ave EBF (261.1) EBTF (183.7) EBRF (87.8) WBLE (58.0) WB C (28.2) WBTD (52.1) WBR C (23.5) IntersectionD (50.3) NBT B (19.8) NB B (18.6) NBR B (11.9) SBLE (76.8) SB C (27.6) SBT B (19.4) White Bear Ave & 23 Highway 36 EB EBLF (125.3) EBF (124.4) EBTF (105.8) EBRF (123.7) IntersectionD (46.5) NBLD (47.5) NB C (24.6) NBT B (17.6) SBT B (18.2) SB B (15.1) SBR A (7.1) White Bear Ave & 24 Highway 36 WB WBLE (64.4) WBE (71.7) WBTD (51.8) WBRE (78.7) Intersection C (25.2) Council Packet Page Number 101 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Center Running Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBT C (21.1) NB C (20.4) NBR B (18.2) SBLD (53.4) SB A (8.9) White Bear Ave & Hill 25 SBT A (5.4) Ave WBLE (79.3) WBE (64.1) WBR C (27.9) Intersection C (21.4) NBLE (55.9) NB C (29.4) NBT C (25.8) NBR C (24.8) SBLE (65.7) SBD (35.6) SBT C (28.5) SBR C (29.8) White Bear Ave & 11th 26 EBLD (41.5) Ave EBD (36.1) EBTD (47.0) EBR C (30.1) WBLD (43.7) WBD (35.4) WBTD (43.3) WBR C (24.0) Intersection C (33.1) NBLE (59.5) NB B (11.4) NBT A (7.6) NBR A (7.2) SBLF (81.7) SBD (39.0) SBTD (38.4) SBRD (36.4) White Bear Ave & Hyvee 27 EBLF (97.9) Shopping Center EBE (76.9) EBTE (65.3) EBRE (59.3) WBLE (68.3) WBE (60.1) WBTF (85.1) WBRD (42.3) Intersection C (31.0) Council Packet Page Number 102 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Center Running Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBLE (77.0) NBD (38.6) NBT C (34.6) NBR C (34.3) SBLF (142.7) SBF (95.3) SBTF (87.8) SBRF (96.7) White Bear Ave & 28 EBLE (62.2) County Road C EBD (40.6) EBTD (48.5) EBR C (25.8) WBLE (62.2) WBD (42.8) WBTD (53.4) WBR C (22.5) IntersectionE (62.2) NBTD (29.2) NBD (29.3) NBRD (29.8) SBTD (27.4) SBD (27.3) White Bear Ave & 29 SBR C (21.5) Radatz Ave EBF (98.5) EBRF (98.5) WBF (71.3) WBRF (71.3) Intersection C (28.9) NBLF (90.0) NBD (45.5) NBT C (30.8) NBR A (9.5) SBLE (65.3) SBD (40.6) SBTD (38.3) SBRD (35.8) White Bear Ave & Beam 30 EBLD (49.9) Ave EB C (26.9) EBTD (42.1) EBR A (3.0) WBL C (33.1) WB C (28.6) WBTD (41.8) WBR A (6.8) IntersectionD (38.7) Council Packet Page Number 103 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Side Running Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBL B (13.7) NB B (12.5) NBT B (12.9) NBR A (7.8) SBL A (4.8) SB A (8.5) SBT B (10.3) SBR A (5.5) White Bear Ave & 17 EBL C (33.9) Larpenteur Ave EBD (36.5) EBTD (44.5) EBR A (7.0) WBL C (34.1) WB C (27.6) WBTD (41.8) WBR A (8.2) Intersection B (18.7) NBT A (0.8) NB A (0.9) NBR A (1.6) White Bear Ave & St 18SB A (1.2) SBT A (1.2) Paul Rd WB B (12.6) WBR B (12.6) Intersection A (1.7) NBT A (3.2) NB A (3.2) NBR A (6.5) SBL A (8.6) SB A (5.4) White Bear Ave & 19 SBT A (4.7) Ripley Ave WBLD (54.4) WB B (12.8) WBR B (11.1) Intersection A (4.9) NBL B (11.2) NB A (7.3) NBT A (6.6) NBR A (4.4) SBL B (11.0) SB B (10.0) SBT B (10.2) SBR A (8.6) White Bear Ave & Frost 20 EBLD (41.1) Ave EB C (20.6) EBTD (50.3) EBR A (7.1) WBL C (33.2) WB C (21.8) WBT C (30.6) WBR B (13.4) Intersection A (9.9) Council Packet Page Number 104 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Side Running Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBL B (15.5) B (11.6) NB NBT B (11.3) NBR B (14.5) SBL A (9.4) SB B (11.6) SBT B (12.5) SBR A (8.7) White Bear Ave & 21 EBL C (30.6) County Road B EB C (32.5) EBTD (37.7) EBR C (20.8) WBL C (33.5) WB C (31.2) WBTD (37.3) WBR C (24.1) Intersection B (16.1) NBL B (13.7) B (11.9) NB NBT B (11.8) NBR B (10.2) SBL B (10.9) SB A (4.9) SBT A (5.0) SBR A (2.1) White Bear Ave & Cope 22 EBLD (46.2) Ave D (35.7) EB EBTD (40.9) EBR A (2.1) WBLE (57.3) WB B (15.3) WBTE (55.0) WBR A (6.6) Intersection B (10.5) NBT A (6.1) A (6.1) NB NBR A (5.6) SBL B (10.2) SB A (5.1) SBT A (4.5) White Bear Ave & 23 Highway 36 EB EBLD (45.9) EB C (26.2) EBTD (53.7) EBR B (14.5) Intersection B (11.4) NBL A (8.7) NB A (4.7) NBT A (2.3) SBT B (12.6) SB B (12.4) SBR B (12.1) White Bear Ave & 24 Highway 36 WB WBLD (49.5) WB C (28.2) WBTD (47.9) WBR A (8.2) Intersection B (10.6) Council Packet Page Number 105 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Side Running Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBT A (2.4) NB A (3.0) NBR A (5.6) SBL A (6.0) SB A (2.9) White Bear Ave & Hill 25 SBT A (2.7) Ave WBLD (52.2) WBD (37.5) WBR A (7.3) Intersection A (6.7) NBL A (9.4) NB A (8.7) NBT A (8.7) NBR A (7.9) SBL B (12.2) SB B (10.5) SBT A (10.0) SBR B (13.3) White Bear Ave & 11th 26 EBLD (47.6) Ave EB C (25.4) EBTD (36.8) EBR B (15.6) WBL C (29.8) WB C (22.8) WBTD (36.2) WBR A (6.4) Intersection B (12.9) NBL A (5.1) NB A (2.3) NBT A (2.1) NBR A (2.5) SBL A (7.3) SB A (4.7) SBT A (4.7) SBR A (5.1) White Bear Ave & 27 EBLE (66.5) Hyvee Shopping Center EBD (42.7) EBTE (56.6) EBR C (21.1) WBL A (3.1) WB C (23.6) WBTE (56.0) WBR B (10.2) Intersection A (5.7) Council Packet Page Number 106 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance AM Peak Period 7:30AM - 8:30AM | Side Running Build AM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBL C (28.5) C (29.6) NB NBT C (30.1) NBR C (24.1) SBL B (15.7) SB B (12.0) SBT B (11.7) SBR B (11.1) White Bear Ave & 28 EBLD (43.8) County Road C EB C (24.3) EBT C (34.7) EBR A (7.6) WBLD (37.9) WB C (26.2) WBTD (37.3) WBR A (8.2) Intersection C (21.5) NBL A (5.8) NB A (3.3) NBT A (3.2) NBR A (3.8) SBL A (3.6) SB A (1.3) SBT A (1.3) SBR A (2.2) White Bear Ave & 29 Radatz Ave EBL A (7.5) EB A (8.2) EBT A (7.4) EBR A (8.5) WBL B (14.4) WB B (11.8) WBR A (9.8) Intersection A (2.8) NBLE (61.8) NB C (24.4) NBT B (11.6) NBR A (5.8) SBLD (54.6) SB B (16.7) SBT B (12.1) SBR A (4.6) White Bear Ave & Beam 30 EBLD (43.7) Ave EB C (22.9) EBTD (44.6) EBR A (3.0) WBLD (41.5) WBD (35.4) WBTD (44.5) WBR A (6.8) Intersection C (22.4) Council Packet Page Number 107 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Side Running Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBL C (25.4) NB C (27.6) C (29.0) NBT B (19.7) NBR SBL C (33.4) B (18.8) SB B (14.8) SBT SBR B (10.6) White Bear Ave & 17 EBLD (44.2) Larpenteur Ave EBD (50.7) EBTE (61.4) A (10.0) EBR WBLD (47.2) WBD (38.7) WBTE (55.4) WBR B (10.2) C (30.4) Intersection NBT A (1.5) A (1.6) NB A (2.1) NBR White Bear Ave & St 18SB A (2.5) SBT A (2.5) Paul Rd WB C (20.7) C (20.7) WBR Intersection A (2.8) A (5.8) NBT NB A (5.8) NBR A (6.2) B (19.5) SBL SB A (8.8) White Bear Ave & 19 SBT A (6.9) Ripley Ave WBLD (53.2) WB C (20.4) WBR B (16.1) A (8.2) Intersection NBL C (29.5) B (10.5) NB A (7.2) NBT NBR A (7.8) C (24.1) SBL SB B (15.2) SBT B (15.2) B (13.4) SBR White Bear Ave & Frost 20 EBLD (46.9) Ave C (21.1) EB EBTD (39.4) EBR A (8.4) WBLD (37.4) WB C (25.3) WBTD (46.0) B (15.8) WBR Intersection B (13.9) Council Packet Page Number 108 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Side Running Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement C (31.2) NBL B (15.8) NB B (15.0) NBT NBR C (23.5) C (22.8) SBL SB C (22.2) SBT C (22.3) B (19.9) SBR White Bear Ave & 21 EBLD (45.0) County Road B EBD (43.3) EBTD (45.5) EBR C (33.5) WBLD (45.1) WBD (42.1) WBTD (49.1) C (34.4) WBR In C (23.8) tersection B (17.7) NBL NB B (13.0) NBT B (12.7) B (10.0) NBR SBL C (21.0) A (4.1) SB A (3.6) SBT SBR A (2.6) White Bear Ave & Cope 22 EBLD (54.7) Ave EBD (43.8) EBTD (38.3) A (3.3) EBR WBLD (45.0) WB C (22.6) WBTD (49.3) WBR B (18.3) B (12.5) Intersection NBT B (18.2) B (16.8) NB A (9.3) NBR SBL C (22.6) A (6.5) SB A (3.9) SBT White Bear Ave & 23 Highway 36 EB EBLE (55.0) EBD (41.3) EBTE (59.7) EBR C (28.0) B (19.7) Intersection NBL B (13.9) A (6.0) NB A (3.7) NBT SBT B (12.2) B (12.3) SB B (12.7) SBR White Bear Ave & 24 Highway 36 WB WBLD (53.8) C (32.2) WB WBTD (47.2) WBR B (13.8) B (11.1) Intersection Council Packet Page Number 109 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Side Running Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement A (6.0) NBT A (6.3) NB A (7.4) NBR SBL B (13.8) A (7.3) SB White Bear Ave & Hill 25 A (6.8) SBT Ave WBLD (52.0) WBD (40.0) B (11.2) WBR Intersection B (10.9) NBLD (37.1) NBD (41.6) NBTD (44.7) C (25.2) NBR SBLD (38.0) C (22.6) SB B (18.9) SBT SBR B (18.3) White Bear Ave & 11th 26 C (33.1) EBL Ave EB C (27.0) EBTD (40.5) B (19.5) EBR WBLD (36.1) C (28.7) WB WBTD (37.2) WBR B (17.7) C (31.4) Intersection NBL C (24.1) B (19.3) NB B (19.0) NBT NBR B (16.0) B (13.6) SBL SB A (8.6) SBT A (8.6) A (7.7) SBR White Bear Ave & Hyvee 27 EBLE (73.6) Shopping Center EBD (49.5) EBTE (58.0) EBR C (28.3) WBLD (41.3) WBD (54.6) WBTE (73.9) WBRD (44.0) Intersection B (18.1) Council Packet Page Number 110 of 297 F5, Attachment 2 Intersection Performance PM Peak Period 4:00PM - 5:00PM | Side Running Build PM +Sftvmut!tipx!uif!bwfsbhf!gspn!6!tjnvmbujpo!svot/ LOS* & Average Delay (sec/veh) IDIntersectionApproachMovement NBLD (47.2) NBD (40.0) NBTD (39.4) NBRD (36.2) C (25.2) SBL SB B (17.2) SBT B (16.4) B (16.2) SBR Whit e Bear Ave & 28 EBLE (70.5) County Road C EBD (43.0) EBTE (63.4) EBR B (17.2) WBLE (59.1) WBD (46.3) WBTD (53.8) C (31.9) WBR Intersection C (31.6) NBLF (62.8) NBF (57.5) NBTF (57.4) NBRF (57.3) SBLE (47.9) A (8.5) SB A (6.5) SBT SBR A (5.5) White Bear Ave & 29 Radatz Ave EBLF (115.9) EBF (86.9) EBT- (-) EBRD (29.1) WBLF (62.2) WBE (41.2) WBRE (34.0) Intersection C (33.6) NBLF (94.4) NBD (45.2) NBT C (27.6) C (20.1) NBR SBLE (68.8) C (27.2) SB C (25.4) SBT SBR A (8.1) White Bear Ave & Beam 30 EBLF (90.8) Ave EBD (39.4) EBTD (41.9) A (4.5) EBR WBLE (62.6) WBD (38.9) WBTD (46.3) WBR A (5.5) IntersectionD (38.0) Council Packet Page Number 111 of 297 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Council Packet Page Number 112 of 297 G1 Council Packet Page Number 113 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 114 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 115 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 116 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 117 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 118 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 119 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 120 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 121 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 122 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 123 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 124 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 125 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 126 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 127 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 128 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 129 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 130 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 131 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 132 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 133 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 134 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 135 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 136 of 297 G1, Attachments Council Packet Page Number 137 of 297 G2 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Identifying the Need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account Funding and Authorizing Application for Grant Funds, JB Vang’s Gladstone VillageII, 1880 English Street North Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: JB Vang is seeking City Council approval of a resolution supporting an application for the Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funding to support its proposed Gladstone Village II multifamily development located at 1880 English Street North. Also, on August 12, 2024, the City Council will consider approval of the land use applications for Gladstone Village II, a 56-unit multifamily building. Recommended Action: Motion to approve a resolution identifying the need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding and authorizing application for grant funds for JB Vang’s Gladstone Village II project at 1880 English Street North. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact?NoYes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s):Adopted BudgetBudget ModificationNew Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: This action is only signifying support of the potential project. Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated CommunicationOperational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan establishes the goal to “Improve the availability of affordable housing for both homeowners and renters” and identified an action item to “Partner with Metropolitan Council and other agencies and programs to provide funding assistance (to developers, and also to those in need of housing) to provide for affordable housing units in the community.” Council Packet Page Number 138 of 297 G2 Background: JB Vang is working to construct 56 affordable housing units in a four-story building at 1880 English Street North. The property is guided by the city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan as a Mixed-Use Neighborhood High Density, which encourages multifamily residential uses. The first phase of Gladstone Village – a 65-unit multifamily building – started construction this summer. JB Vang has identified a funding gap in their proposed Gladstone Village II project – which is common for affordable housing developments – and is working to secure funding via the Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funding. Staff wants to emphasize that approval of the attached resolution does not bind the city to any financial agreement. If any grant funding is awarded, a separate agreement will be brought back to the council for consideration and approval. Staff has worked with JB Vang to submit the initial elements of the grant application to the Metropolitan Council. The remaining element, an adopted resolution of support from the City Council, is needed to complete the application. Attachments: 1.Location Map 2.Resolution Identifying the Need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account Funding and Authorizing Application for Grant Funds Council Packet Page Number 139 of 297 Attachment 1 Overview Map - 1880 English Street North June 18, 2024 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Subject Parcel 0475 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Council Packet Page Number 140 of 297 Attachment 2 THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR GLADSTONE VILLAGE II WHEREAS, theCityof Maplewoodis a participant in the Livable CommunitiesAct's Local Housing Incentives Account Program for 2024 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is, therefore, eligible to apply for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has identified a proposed project within the City to be developed by JB Vang Partners that meets the Demonstration Account's purposes and criteria and is consistent with and promotes the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council's adopted metropolitan development guide; and WHEREAS, JB Vang Partners has requested that the Maplewood City Council sponsor an application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds for its Gladstone Village project in the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project grant administration; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the grant application submitted on August 12, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council acknowledges Livable Communities Demonstration Account grants are intended to fund projects or project components that can serve as models, examples or prototypes for development or redevelopment projects elsewhere in the region, and therefore represents that the proposed project(s) or key components of the proposed project(s) can be replicated in other metropolitan-area communities; and WHEREAS, only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account during each funding cycle and the Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce grant funds only to eligible projects that would not occur without the availability of Demonstration Account grant funding. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the Maplewood City Council: Council Packet Page Number 141 of 297 Attachment 2 1.Finds that it is in the best interests of the City's development goals and priorities for the proposed project to occur at this particular site and at this particular time. 2.Finds that the project components for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is sought: a.will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the reasonably foreseeable future; and b.will occur within three years after a grant award only if Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is made available for this project at this time. 3.Represents that JB Vang Partners has undertaken reasonable and good faith efforts to procure funding for the project components for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is sought but was not able to find or secure from other sources funding that is necessary for project component completion within three years. 4.Authorizes its City Manager to submit on behalf of the Maplewood City Council and JB Vang Partners an application for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds for the project component(s) identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Maplewood City Council. The foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember ____ and duly seconded by Councilmember ___ . The following council members voted in favor of the resolution: _______. The following council membersvoted against the resolution: _______. The following council members were absent: _______. Whereupon the resolution was adopted. Mayor City Manager Council Packet Page Number 142 of 297 G3 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Supporting Application for a Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) RedevelopmentGrant, 1375 Frost Avenue East Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative is seeking City Council approval of a resolution supporting an application to the State of Minnesota’s Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) for a grant associated with developing the property located at 1375 Frost Avenue East. On July 10, 2023, the City Council approved Beacon’s three-story, 40-unit multifamily apartment building. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the resolution of support for a grant application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development’s Redevelopment Grant fund. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: No city funds are being requested or are required as part of the grant applications. Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The city supports partnering with developers to secure funding from other agencies to bring funds into Maplewood to foster quality development. Background: To proceed with the redevelopment of the former Gladstone House at 1375 Frost Avenue East, the developer is seeking available grant funding for redevelopment costs. The city is not being asked for, nor is it required, to match any dollars as part of this grant request. Council Packet Page Number 143 of 297 G3 The developer is seeking a resolution of support from the Maplewood City Council to applyto the DEED Redevelopment Grant fund for demolition, stormwater infrastructure, public improvements, and soil corrections related to the project. Attached to this memo is a resolution that must be executed and submitted as part of the grant application. Attachments: 1.Overview Map 2.Letter from Developer 3.Resolution Identifying the Need for Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Redevelopment Funding Council Packet Page Number 144 of 297 G, Attachment 1 1375 Frost Avenue - Overview Map May 24, 2023 City of Maplewood 2000 1991 1968 1973 1965 1970 1960 1957 1955 1949 1954 1946 1960 19411945 1948 1315 1942 1351 1940 1938 1347 1321 1375 1321 1401 1313 1319 1317 1323 1927 1910 1344 1350 1426 1900 1380 1907 1310 1900 1897 1894 1896 1894 1893 1890 1899 1893 1880 1889 1880 1890 1889 1888 1890 1880 1881 1880 1880 1881 1880 1880 1879 1880 1878 1880 1874 1871 1872 1880 1880 1880 1865 Legend 1870 1866 1869 1870 1383 1864 Subject Property 0240 Feet 1856 1854 1855 Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County 1852 1851 Council Packet Page Number 145 of 297 G Attachment 2 July 9, 2024 Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative 2610 University Ave W. Suite 100 St. Paul,MN 55114 City of Maplewood MN 1830 County Rd B E Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Resolution of Support DEEDRedevelopment Grant – 1375 Frost Ave To Whom it May Concern: Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, in its capacity as the sole member of Gladstone LLC, is seeking a resolution of support from the City of Maplewood forthe DEED Redevelopment Grant applicationdue st on August 1, 2024. The funds will support the redevelopment of 1375 Frost Avenueinto 40 units of affordable housing. With the City’s support, the project wouldsubmit an applicationfor $145,000 to offset the cost ofgrant eligible work. This includes demolition, stormwater infrastructure, public improvements andsoil corrections. 1375 Frost Avewas sold by theCity of Maplewood to Gladstone LLC for the purposeofdeveloping40 units of affordable housing. The project has secured land use approvaland capital funding from Ramsey County, Met Council, MN Housing as well as a preliminary commitment of TIFfrom Maplewood. This award from DEED would help ensure that the projecthas sufficient funds to begin construction in spring 2025. Thank you for taking the time to consider this request. We are grateful for the support Maplewood has shown this project andare excited to continuetowork with the City to bring new affordable housing to the area. Respectfully, Joan Bennett Sr. Project Manager Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative Council Packet Page Number 146 of 297 G, Attachment 3 RESOLUTION NO.____________ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR MINNESOTA’S DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT’S REDEVELOPMENT FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR BEACON’S PROJECT AT 1375 FROST AVENUE EAST BE IT RESOLVED that the city of Maplewood has approved the Redevelopment grant application submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) no later than August 1, 2024, by the City of Maplewood for the 1375 Frost Avenue East site. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city of Maplewood is located within the seven- county metropolitan area defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2, and is participating in the local housing incentives program under section 473.254. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood act as the legal sponsor for the project contained in the Redevelopment Grant Program to be submitted no later than August 1, 2024, and that the Assistant Community Development Director is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are committed to the project identified. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state the City of Maplewood may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above- referenced project, and that the City of Maplewood certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if the project identified in the application fails to substantially provide the public benefits listed in the application within five years from the date of the grant award, the city of Maplewood may be required to repay 100 percent of the awarded grant per Minn. Stat. § 116J.575, Subd. 4 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Council Packet Page Number 147 of 297 G Attachment 3 I CERTIFYTHAT theaboveresolutionwasadoptedbytheCityCouncilofMaplewood on August 12, 2024. SIGNED: (Authorized Official) WITNESSED: ________________________________ ________________________ Mayor City Clerk Council Packet Page Number 148 of 297 G4 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Andrea Sindt, City Clerk Christine Evans, Deputy City Clerk PRESENTER:Andrea Sindt, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM: Local Lawful Gambling Permit for the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 1725 Kennard Street, October 12,2024 Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: A request for a Local Lawful Gambling permit has been submitted by Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Approval of the request would allow lawful gambling activity to be conducted during the church’s MCAD Men’s Club fundraiser held October 12, 2024. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Local Lawful Gambling permit for Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary for October 12, 2024. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is 0.00 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: na Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment Council approval is required prior to issuance of a local gambling permit, per City Code Sec. 22-12. Background: Lawful gambling activity conducted at this event is exempt from state licensure under MN §349.166. MN §349.213 authorizes cities to require a local permit for conduct of lawful gambling exempt from state licensing requirements. Attachments: None Council Packet Page Number 149 of 297 G5 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Andrea Sindt, City Clerk Christine Evans, Deputy City Clerk PRESENTER:Andrea Sindt, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM: Local Lawful Gambling Permit for the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 1725 Kennard Street, November 23, 2024 Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: A request for a Local Lawful Gambling permit has been submitted by Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Approval of the request would allow lawful gambling activity to be conducted during the church’s Turkey Bingo event held November 23, 2024. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Local Lawful Gambling permit for Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary for November 23, 2024. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is 0.00 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: na Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment Council approval is required prior to issuance of a local gambling permit, per City Code Sec. 22-12. Background: Lawful gambling activity conducted at this event is exempt from state licensure under MN §349.166. MN §349.213 authorizes cities to require a local permit for conduct of lawful gambling exempt from state licensing requirements. Attachments: None Council Packet Page Number 150 of 297 G6 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM:Andrea Sindt, City Clerk Christine Evans, Deputy City Clerk PRESENTER: Andrea Sindt, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM: Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for DRAAZ Liquor Corporation, dba Rice StreetLiquors,1700 Rice Street Unit P Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action:ResolutionOrdinanceContract/AgreementProclamation Policy Issue: In accordance with City Code Chapter 6 (Alcoholic Beverages), an application for an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor license was submitted by Sharmaine Meadows of DRAAZ Liquor Corporation, dba Rice Street Liquors, which is taking over ownership and operation of Rice St Liquors, located at 1700 Rice Street Unit P. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for DRAAZ Liquor Corporation, dba Rice Street Liquors, 1700 Rice Street Unit P. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0.00 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: NA Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment Council approval is required prior to issuance of an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor license, per City Code Sec. 6-165. Background: For the purposes of the license application, a background investigation was conducted on owner Sharmaine Meadows. A representative from the police department has met with the owner to discuss the measures to eliminate the sale of alcohol to underage persons, general security and the city ordinances pertaining to the service of alcohol. Attachments: None Council Packet Page Number 151 of 297 G7 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO: Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Andrea Sindt, City Clerk Christine Evans, Deputy City Clerk PRESENTER:Andrea Sindt, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM: Resolution for a Lawful Gambling Premises Permit for White Bear Lake Area Hockey Association at Johnny Kitchen & Bar Inc., 1900 County Road D E #135 Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: A request for a Lawful Gambling Premises permit has been submitted by White Bear Lake Area Hockey Association. Approval of the request would allow lawful gambling activity (pull-tabs, bar bingo, tip-boards and paddlewheel) to be conducted at Johnny Kitchen & Bar Inc., 1900 County Road D E #135, on an ongoing basis. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the resolution for a lawful gambling premises permit for White Bear Lake Area Hockey Association to conduct gambling activities at Johnny Kitchen & Bar Inc., 1900 County Road D E #135. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact?NoYes, the true or estimated cost is $0.00 Financing source(s):Adopted BudgetBudget ModificationNew Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment Approval and issuance of a Premises permit is done by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board; however, before the Board will review an application, Council approval of the activity is required per MN §349.213 subd. 2. Background: The White Bear Lake Area Hockey Association has been one of the premier youth hockey associations in the state since 1968. Since then, the association has been a pioneer in the Council Packet Page Number 152 of 297 G7 development in hockey players, coaches and philosophies. The organization has been conducting lawful gambling since 2010 and currently conducts lawful gambling at 5 locations: White Bear Bar, Saks, Doc’s Landing, Jimmy’s and Beartown. For the purposes of this application, a background investigation has been conducted on the organization’s designated gambling manager: Kevin Bergerson. Attachments: 1.Resolution for a Lawful Gambling Premises Permit Council Packet Page Number 153 of 297 G7, Attachment 1 RESOLUTION ______ LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT FOR WHITE BEAR LAKE AREA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION AT JOHNNY KITCHEN & BAR INC. WHEREAS, White Bear Lake Area Hockey Association has submitted an application to the City of Maplewood requesting City approval of a Lawful Gambling Premises permit application, to be used at Johnny Kitchen & Bar Inc., 1900 County Road D E #135, Maplewood, MN; WHEREAS, local approval is required prior to the Gambling Control Board’s issuance of a premises permit; BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, MN, that the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for White Bear Lake Area Hockey Association to conduct gambling activities at Johnny Kitchen & Bar Inc., 1900 County Road D E #135, Maplewood, MN. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Board approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute §349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, MN, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Board for their approval. Council Packet Page Number 154 of 297 G8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Brian Bierdeman, Director of Public Safety PRESENTER:Brian Bierdeman, Director of Public Safety AGENDA ITEM: Purchase of Emergency Response Vehicle Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: Law Enforcement officers are facing heightened levels of firearms assaults and high-risk situations. A readily available emergency response vehicle will provide enhanced protection for public safety staff and citizens against such threats. City Council approval is required to purchase an Emergency Response Vehicle. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the purchase of an Emergency Response Vehicle from Lenco. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $332,967.00 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment City Council approval is required prior to purchase. Background With the enhanced protection of an emergency response vehicle, officers can offer a more controlled response to high-risk situations, minimizing the escalation risk and better ensuring everyone's safety. This specialized vehicle will serve as a crucial asset in ensuring the protection of both public safety staff and the community during incidents such as armed standoffs, hostage situations, and other emergencies where enhanced protection and tactical maneuverability are imperative. Recently, we have seen an increase both locally and nationally in officers being shot or shot at. Enhanced officer safety is a key benefit, as emergency response vehicles provide a significant safety advantage for officers by offering robust protection against firearms and other threats. This enables Council Packet Page Number 155 of 297 G8 officers to approach dangerous situations with greater confidence and security, reducing the likelihood of injuries or fatalities. Furthermore, an emergency response vehicle can be instrumental in severe weather conditions, such as tornados, floods, or heavy snowstorms, where traditional vehicles would be out of service and not able to respond for extended periods of time. Its durability and all-terrain capabilities ensure that emergency responders can reach affected areas and provide necessary assistance to those in need. In addition, the emergency response vehicle can be utilized as an asset for medics during critical incidents. It can transport medical personnel safely into high-risk areas, allowing them to provide urgent medical care to injured individuals without exposing themselves to undue danger. This dual-use capability enhances the overall emergency response effectiveness of the public safety department, ensuring that both law enforcement and medical teams can operate safely and efficiently in various challenging scenarios. Ultimately, the acquisition of an emergency response vehicle represents a proactive measure to enhance public safety and emergency response capabilities. By providing advanced protection and versatility, it supports the Department mission of safeguarding the community and upholding the well- being of both staff and civilians in the face of diverse threats and emergencies. The cost of the Emergency Response Vehicle is $332,967.00. Attachments 1.Lenco Quotation Council Packet Page Number 156 of 297 G8, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 157 of 297 G9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Mychal Fowlds, IT Director PRESENTER:Mychal Fowlds, IT Director AGENDA ITEM: Info-Tech Membership Agreement Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: Subscribing to Info-Tech provides the IT department with valuable research, tools, and benchmarks to improve performance and stay current with industry trends. Membership also offers vendor and contract reviews, training resources, and a 5-day workshop on the topic of our choice. Recommended Action: Motion to approve entering into a 1 year membership agreement with Info-Tech, approval to make payment for that membership and a budget transfer of Public Safety Aid funds in the amount of $20,700.00 to the IT Fund, from which the entire invoice will be paid. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $65,700.00. Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment The resources provided with the Info-Tech membership will enhance operational effectiveness by providing valuable insights, tools, and benchmarks that streamline IT processes, support informed decision-making, and drive continuous improvement. Background: Public Safety in Maplewood continues to be at the forefront of technology use. In 2024 Public Safety was awarded aid money from the State of MN. Staff would like to use a portion of that money, $20,700.00, to perform a technology assessment for the Public Safety department. A technology assessment for Public Safety ensures that current systems are effective, reliable, and meet operational needs. It will help identify gaps and optimize resource use while keeping pace with emerging threats and advancements. The evaluation will enhance overall safety and operational efficiency, ensuring that personnel are well-supported. Council Packet Page Number 158 of 297 G9 In addition to the Public Safety assessment, IT staff identified a need for up-to-date research and best practices to enhance our operations and decision-making. After evaluating options, we found that Info-Tech's comprehensive resources, tools, and benchmarking capabilities, along with their ability to perform the Public Safety technology assessment, set them apart. Staff was provided an opportunity for substantial savings (approximately $21,000) and additional membership resources (membership for all IT staff equaling $16,000 in value) if the agreement was signed prior to Info-Tech’s fiscal year end, the end of July. As such, City Manager Sable signed the agreement on July 23, 2024 as you can see in the attached membership agreement. The item is being brought before you after the fact for formal approval. Attachments: 1.Info-Tech agreement 2.Info-Tech invoice Council Packet Page Number 159 of 297 G9, Attachment 1 Page1 of 4 Council Packet Page Number 160 of 297 G9, Attachment 1 Page2 of 4 Council Packet Page Number 161 of 297 G9, Attachment 1 $21,000.04$65,700.00 Total$41,500.00$3,500.00$0.00$0.00$20,700.00$0.00 Total: Total Discounts: Discount$10,046.39$932.00$7,010.31$0.00$3,011.34$0.00 Subtotal$51,546.39$4,432.00$7,010.31$0.00$23,711.34$0.00 Quantity 1.001.001.001.001.001.004.00 Page3 of 4 Description Dedicated Executive Counselor,Unlimited IT Vendor PriceBenchmarking, IT Vendor NegotiationAssistance for 2 contracts, Unlimited ITContract Review ServicesAccess to core research content - project blueprints, Info-Tech Academy,online Leadership training, softwareselection content, tools and templateslibraryDeep Insights Tailored To YourIndustryLeadership Summit (CoreMembership)5-Day Online Virtual Workshop to solveyour most pressing problemAccess to core research content - project blueprints, Info-Tech Academy,software selection content, tools andtemplates library Bundle Options See below for your selectedbundle productsCounselor MembershipTeam MembershipIndustry /SELeadership SummitOnline WorkshopMembership Product SE Core MembershipReference Membership Council Packet Page Number 162 of 297 G9, Attachment 1 e include PO if Notes ion to the fees listed. Workshops oposal. This Service Agreement is subject to July 23, 2025 Term End Date Page4 of 4 July 23, 2024 Date _________________________________ Signature _____________________________ Term Start Date Invoice Amount $65,700.00 Invoice Date July 23, 2024 1 Term Number Payment terms: Payable upon receipt of InvoiceUnless otherwise stated, consulting and workshop engagements do not include travel and expenses, which will be charged in additpurchased as part of membership expire without refund or credit at the end of the membership period covered by the purchase. Workshops purchased outsidemembership expire without refund or credit 1-year after purchase. Please work with your member services representative to select and schedule workshops prior toexpiration.Subject to applicable taxes. If your company is tax exempt, please provide a valid tax exemption certificate with the signed prthe terms of the Federal Supply Schedule for Info-Tech, available online, including s 552.238-114 (Use of Federal Supply Schedule Contracts by Non-Federal Entities) ofthe GS-35F-298GA Contract Clause This proposal has a definite expiry date of July 23, 2024.Please return this signed Service Agreement to Info-Tech by DocuSign, email adaigle@infotech.com or fax (1-519-432-2506). Pleasrequired. Thank you for your business!_____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________The signature below affirms your commitment to pay for the services ordered in accordance with the terms of this service agreement and in accordance with theTerms of Use.If you are tax exempt, please provide tax exemption certificate.Name _______________________________Title _________________________________ Council Packet Page Number 163 of 297 G9, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 164 of 297 G9, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 165 of 297 G10 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Mychal Fowlds, IT Director PRESENTER:Mychal Fowlds, IT Director AGENDA ITEM: Payment for Tyler Enterprise ERP Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: In 2022 the Finance and HR Departments chose Tyler Enterprise ERP (formally MUNIS) as the software application to replace Eden Systems. Tyler Enterprise ERP is used for all Finance functions and a majority of Human Resources tasks. This item is to approve the yearly subscription payment for Tyler Enterprise ERP. Recommended Action: Motion to approve payment for Tyler Enterprise ERP yearly subscription. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $82,376.60. Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: n/a Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment Tyler Enterprise ERP provides many new tools that will increase staff efficiency. Background: In 2022 the City Council approved an agreement with Tyler Technologies which allowed staff to proceed with transitioning from Eden Systems to Tyler Enterprise ERP (formally MUNIS). At that time the City’s financial software package, Eden Systems, was 22 years old and was no longer supported. Shortly after that item was approved, City Finance staff began the implementation process for Enterprise ERP. The Finance Department went live with the Financial functions utilized in the software in October of 2023. Finance and Human Resources recently went live with payroll st functionality on July 1, 2024. This payment includes all Tyler Enterprise ERP subscriptions used by Maplewood staff. Council Packet Page Number 166 of 297 G10 Attachments: 1.Tyler Technologies invoice Council Packet Page Number 167 of 297 G10, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 168 of 297 G10, Attachment 1 Council Packet Page Number 169 of 297 G11 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Steven Love, Public Works Director / City Engineer Jon Jarosch, Assistant City Engineer Tyler Strong, Civil Engineer I PRESENTER:Steven Love AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study, 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12 Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The City Council will consider initiating a street improvement project by ordering the preparation of a feasibility study. The streets to be improved are identified on the attached project location map. Ordering the feasibility study is the first step in the development of a street improvement project. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the attached Resolution, Ordering the Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $100,000.00 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Fund Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated CommunicationOperational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The feasibility study is the first step in the process towards making infrastructure improvements to the project streets and utilities. The feasibility study establishes the project scope, estimated project costs, funding sources, and project timeline. Council Packet Page Number 170 of 297 G11 Background: The 2025 Maplewood Street Improvement project includes streets in two different areas of the City consisting of the Prosperity-Hazelwood area and pavement rehabilitation streets located in the southern leg of Maplewood. A map of the streets included in the project is attached. The streets to be improved total approximately 4.10 miles. These project areas are a part of the proposed 2025 – 2029 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The streets have an average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating of 41 (on a scale of 1 to 100) according to the most recent surveys. These streets have continued to deteriorate over the years and need improvements. The feasibility study will establish project improvements, estimated cost, funding sources, and a project budget. The streets will be reviewed through the lens of our guiding documents (Comprehensive Plan, Living Streets Policy, etc.) to identify needed improvements. Staff will also look into the condition of the existing features such as curbing, sidewalks, trails, water main, storm sewer and sanitary sewer to determine if any improvements are necessary to these systems. Throughout the project development process, property owners will have many opportunities to provide input on the project. Neighborhood meetings, a project website, and conversations with staff by phone or email are a few ways residents can provide input on the project. If authorized, Staff will commence with preparing the report, geotechnical investigation, topographic survey, assessment appraisal analysis, neighborhood meetings, informational mailings, and all other tasks associated with preparing the feasibility study. Attachments: 1. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study 2. Project Location Map Council Packet Page Number 171 of 297 G11, Attachment 1 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed to make improvements to the Prosperity-Hazelwood streetsand the pavement rehabilitation streets in southernMaplewood, which is hereby called the 2025 Maplewood Street Improvements, City Project 24-12. AND WHEREAS, it is proposedto assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed im provement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the City Council advising the council, in a preliminary way, as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible, and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $100,000 are appropriated to prepare this Feasibility Study. Approved this 12th day of August, 2024. Council Packet Page Number 172 of 297 G11, Attachment 2 Council Packet Page Number 173 of 297 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Council Packet Page Number 174 of 297 H1 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director Gladstone Village II, 1880 English Street North AGENDA ITEM: a.Public Hearing b.Public Vacation of an Easement Resolution (4 Votes) c.Conditional Use Permit Resolution d.Design Review Resolution Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: JB Vang proposes to develop Gladstone Village II, a 56-unit affordable multi-family apartment project located on an approximately 1.15-acre site at 1880 English Street North. The applicant is currently constructing a 65-unit building directly north of this site. To proceed with this project, the applicant requests city council approval for a public vacation of a utility easement, a conditional use permit, and design review. Recommended Action: a.Hold the Public Hearing b.Motion to approve a resolution for the public vacation of an easement located within the site at 1880 English Street North. c.Motion to approve a resolution for a conditional use permit approving a four-story, 56-unit multi-family apartment project to be constructed at 1880 English Street North. d.Motion to approve a resolution for design review approving a four-story, 65-unit multi-family apartment project to be constructed at 1880 English Street North. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Community InclusivenessFinancial & Asset MgmtEnvironmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment Council Packet Page Number 175 of 297 H1 The city deemed the applicant's application complete on July 1, 2024. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is August 30, 2024. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. Background: JB Vang proposes to develop Gladstone Village II, a 56-unit affordable multi-family apartment project located on an approximately 1.15-acre site at 1880 English Street North. The project will be a 4-story development providing a mix of 56 one-, two-, three-, and four-bedroom apartments, ground-level resident-use amenities, and one level of underground parking. JB Vang intends to begin construction in 2025. This project complements the applicant's other project just to the north. Last year, the city approved a 65-unit affordable multi-family apartment project at 1310 Frost Avenue East – now referred to as The Juniper. The project will also be a 4-story development; site work has recently begun. The applicant hosted a community open house on June 13, 2024, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the Wakefield Park Community Building. Invites were sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the project's site. The night of the open house, the applicant brought poster boards with preliminary renderings for residents to see and comment on if desired. The open house was lightly attended by three adults. The existing site where this project is proposed currently has seven rental housing units occupied. The existing property owners—Midvest LLC and JB Vang—have been meeting with each tenant to inform them of the redevelopment project and ensure that all relocation benefits that federal or state law requires are appropriately allocated. The city does not have a role or any requirements for this aspect of the project. Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan The Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan outlines nine guiding principles to redevelopment in the area as follows: 1.Design the future of Gladstone as a village. 2.Transform regional trails into celebrated village corridors. 3.Make Gladstone a compelling quality of life choice. 4.Weave natural systems and ecological function into the built and recreational environment. 5.Allow Gladstone's future to whisper the story of its past. 6.Make walkability the standard. 7.Think of Gladstone as a neighborhood for all stages of life. 8.Make the Gladstone redevelopment plan a model for others to follow. 9.Make multi-modal links between Gladstone and areas beyond. Public Vacation of an Easement The applicant requests the public vacation of an easement initially taken for utilities on the site's east side as part of a vacation process in 1971 for an unused street right-of-way. This easement was never used for utility placement and currently contains no public utilities. The Engineering Department has no concerns with the proposed easement vacation. When approving public vacations, if a majority of the abutting property owners sign a petition, the city council may approve the vacation by a simple majority vote. Without this petition, the council Council Packet Page Number 176 of 297 H1 may only approve the vacation, with at least four of the five members voting to approve it. The proposed easement vacation is entirely within the parcel of 1880 English Street North and does not affect any abutting properties. Ramsey County Regional Rail – the Bruce Vento Trail – owns the abutting property to the east. Ramsey County has no concerns about the easement. However, signing the required petition requires the approval of the full Ramsey County Board. The applicant has elected not to go through that process and requests that the Maplewood City Council approve this request with a four-vote majority as permitted by state statute. Conditional Use Permit Four-Story Building The MU – mixed-use zoning district requires a conditional use permit for any residential buildings over three stories or 35 feet tall. The applicant's proposed building will be four stories and typically approximately 46 feet from ground level to the top of the parapet. Isolated areas of the building will encroach 50 feet in height for the roof hatches and the overrun for the elevator shaft. In comparison, The Juniper, to the north of this site, will be 48 feet in height, and the multi-family buildings on the northwest corner of Frost Avenue and English Street, approved as part of the Frost-English Village redevelopment project, are 51 feet tall. Design Review Site Plan The project site would be accessed from a single drive coming off English Street on the southwest corner of the site. The proposed building would be on the site's north and west sides, with surface parking to the southeast. The city's mixed-use district requires surface parking to be at the rear of the building. The mixed-use district also requires a front yard setback for multiple dwelling buildings to be no more than 20 feet, with a minimum of zero feet – from the English Street frontage. There are no side or rear building setback requirements. Parking lots must be setback five feet from the side and rear property lines. All setback requirements are being met. Building Elevations Exterior building walls adjacent to or visible from a public right-of-way or public open space may not exceed 40 feet in width. New buildings of more than 40 feet in width are allowed if the building wall is divided into smaller increments, between 20 and 40 feet in width, through the articulation of the façade. Exterior-building materials shall be classified as primary, secondary,or accent material. Primary materials shall cover at least 60 percent of all façades of a building. Secondary materials may cover no more than 30 percent of all façades of a building. Accent materials may include door and window frames, lintels, cornices, and other minor elements and may cover no more than ten percent of all façades of a building. The community design review board may consider exceptions to the above-mentioned design standards if they uphold the integrity of the guidelines and result in an attractive, cohesive development design as intended by ordinance. The primary materials for the proposed 56-unit multi-family building are brick and glass – with brick being utilized in two different tones of color – and will comprise 66 percent of the elevations. Secondary materials include stucco and masonry, making up 33 percent of the elevations. Accent materials will include black metal panels. The proposed elevations slightly exceed the allowed percentage for secondary materials. Given that the primary materials also exceed the minimum Council Packet Page Number 177 of 297 H1 while minimizing accent materials, staff is comfortable with the elevations as presented. The building will be articulated in 20-40 foot segments and meets ordinance requirements. Unit Sizes The ordinance requires minimum unit sizes of 580 square feet per efficiency or one-bedroom units, 740 square feet for two-bedroom units, 860 square feet for three-bedroom units, and 1,040 square feet for four-bedroom units. All units in this project meet these requirements. Parking Waiver Parking spaces in the mixed-use district must be nine feet wide – the applicant's site plans meet this requirement. City ordinance states that multi-family buildings must provide two parking spaces for each unit, with one parking space covered. This project requires a total of 112 spaces. The applicant is proposing to include 50 underground parking spaces and 15 surface parking spaces for a total of 65 parking spaces. The applicant is seeking a waiver of 47 spaces. The applicant believes the ratio of 1.16 stalls per dwelling unit will be sufficient for the targeted resident population and building's location. The applicant has submitted a traffic memo that includes a summary of the estimated added traffic from this project and has shared a summary of the parking usage at two other affordable housing properties the developer has built. In addition, the applicant has communicated that 14 of the 56 units will be reserved for supportive housing, and the developer's experience is that these residents are unlikely to have a vehicle. The Institute of Transportation Engineers' Parking Generation Manual recommends 0.65 spaces per affordable unit, which would mean 37 spaces for this project. For additional context, Metro Transit's Route 64 also has north- and south-bound stops directly adjacent to this site. Landscaping and Screening All land areas not occupied by buildings, parking, driveways, sidewalks, or other hard surfaces must be sodded or mulched and landscaped with approved ground cover, flowers, shrubbery, and trees. Hard-surfaced areas, including sidewalks and patios, must include amenities such as benches, planters, and bike racks. Perimeter landscape or pedestrian walls are required for all parking lots and shall be established along the road and edges of the parking lot. The landscape treatment or pedestrian wall shall run the full length of the parking lot and be located between the property line and the edge of the parking lot. There are ten significant trees on site, equaling 291 caliper inches. The applicants propose to remove nine trees equaling 279 caliper inches. This represents 96 percent tree removal. City code requires 309 caliper inches of replacement trees on the site (which equals 154 – 2 caliper inches of replacement trees). The landscape plan shows 74 new trees ranging in size from 2 to 2.5 caliper inches, totaling 208.5 caliper inches of replacement trees, which does not meet the tree replacement requirements. The applicant must either plant an additional 100.5 caliper inches of replacement trees or the applicant can pay into the city's tree fund at a rate of $60 per caliper inch. Lighting The applicant submitted a photometric plan as part of its application. It appears the plan slightly exceeds code requirements along the south property boundary. Before any permits are issued, the Council Packet Page Number 178 of 297 H1 applicant must submit a revised photometric plan showing allcode requirements being met. Trash Enclosure All trash and recycling containers will be stored in an enclosure on the south end of the parking lot. Department Comments Engineering Please see Jon Jarosch' s engineering report, dated July 9, 2024, attached to this report. Environmental Please see Shann Finwall's environmental report, dated July 8, 2024, attached to this report. Building Official – Randy Johnson The proposed building is required to meet the minimum requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code. Commission Review Community Design Review Board July 16, 2024: The community design review board reviewed this project and recommended approval. Planning Commission July 16, 2024: The planning commission reviewed this project, held a public hearing and recommended approval. Citizen Comments Staff sent public hearing notices to the 34 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the subject site and invited owners to provide their opinions about this proposal. Staff has received one comment and is included below. I've been out of town and today opened the mailing on the proposed Phase 2 56-unit apt complex at the trailer park site on English, a 1.15 acre site. I was not available to attend the developers dog & pony at Wakefield. I raised my family on Clarence street so am very familiar with the neighborhood. My kids delivered newspapers to the trailer park. Always some interesting stories but also eye opening for them. I appreciate the city's accomplishments in the NW quadrant of Frost & English and looks like the old Lions building/Hmong funeral home is slated for Phase 1. I was City Engineer for the City Crystal for 20 years and assistant at Coon Rapids for 10 years prior. It pretty much went without saying that developers invariably came in with a 4 story proposal in a 3 story zone seeking a conditional use and/or variance for their project touting all the benefits and of course minimizing the negatives. I have not dug into Phase 1 and what the city has allowed other than a four story structure. In my experience putting 56 units onto a 1.15 acre site is a density beyond what should be allowed. The only way this is being accomplished is by cutting the required parking pretty much in half. Council Packet Page Number 179 of 297 H1 I'm somewhat shocked that the City staff is recommending 1.15 stalls per unit especially considering the number of 2, 3, and 4 bedroom units. The lip service from the developer to this somehow being OK is deplorable. Gotta love the reference to the bike trail and the yet to be finalized, if ever, BRT on White Bear a full mile away, as if this will somehow magically reduce the number of vehicles looking for a parking place and spilling into the neighborhood. Absolutely nothing is said about "visitor" parking much less the fact that affordable housing often attracts multiple families living in one unit. Forcing people to park on the street up to a block or more away will only attract vehicle vandalism if not theft of the vehicle. Would you please explain the Comm Dev Dept's thinking on this project and allowing so many units on a postage stamp with minimal parking? (Thomas Mathisen, 5238 Clear Spring Dr, Minnetonka – owns two vacant lots to the east of the Vento Trail) Reference Information Site Description Campus Size: 1.15 acres Existing Land Use: Manufactured Homes Surrounding Land Uses North: Gladstone Village I – under construction East: Bruce Vento Trail and single-family homes South: Vacant land owned by Ramsey County Regional Rail West: English Street and Gladstone Savanna Planning Existing Land Use: Mixed-Use - Neighborhood HD Existing Zoning: Mixed-Use Attachments: 1.Public Vacation of an Easement Resolution 2.Conditional Use Permit Resolution 3.Design Review Resolution 4.Overview Map 5.2040 Future Land Use Map 6.Zoning Map 7.Applicant's Narrative 8.Site Plan 9.Building Elevations 10.Landscape Plan 11.Engineering Report, dated July 9, 2024 12.Environmental Report, dated July 8, 2024 13.Applicant's Traffic Memo and Parking Information 14.Draft CDRB Minutes, July 16, 2024 15.Draft Planning Commission Minutes, July 16, 2024 16.Presentation Slides 17.Applicant's Plans (separate attachment) Council Packet Page Number 180 of 297 H1, Attachment 1 PUBLIC VACATION OF AN EASEMENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ashley Bisner of JB Vang, petitioned the Maplewood City Council to vacate an unused public easement within the site at 1880 English Street North. 1.02 Gladstone, Ramsey Co Minn is the plat that created the lots that comprise 1880 English Street North. 1.03 The utility easement was originally recorded with the vacation of Ridge Street from Skillman Avenue to 320 feet south of Ripley Street on June 3, 1971 with a recording document number of 1801806. 1.04 This resolution vacates the utility easement within the former Ridge Street right-of- way for the property legally described as: The South 7 feet of Lot 7, and all of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 3, Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota. 1.05 Hearing notices on the said petition were published in the City of Maplewood's official newspaper, and a written notice was mailed to the affected property owners. 1.06 On August 12, 2024, the City Council held a hearing on such a petition, at which time all persons for and against the granting of said petition were heard. Section 2. Standards 2.01 Minnesota state statute requires that no vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The Maplewood City Council makes the following findings: 1.There is no anticipated public need for the described unused public easement. 2.The vacation is not counter to the public interest. Section 4. City Council 4.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Council Packet Page Number 181 of 297 H1, Attachment 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ashley Bisner, of JB Vang, has requested approval of a conditional use permit to permit a four-story multi-family building. 1.02 The property is located at 1880 English Street North and is legally described as: PIN: 152922320077. The South 7 feet of Lot 7, and all of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 3, Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Abstract Property Section 2. Standards. 2.01 City Ordinance Section 44-512(4) requires a Conditional Use Permit for the exterior storage of goods or materials. 2.02 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. City Ordinance Section 44-1097(a) states that the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine standards for approval. 1.The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2.The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3.The use would not depreciate property values. 4.The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5.The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. 6.The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7.The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8.The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. Council Packet Page Number 182 of 297 H1, Attachment 2 9.The use wouldcause minimal adverse environmental effects. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The proposal meets the specific conditional use permit standards. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this conditional use permit request. 1.On July 16, 2024, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this resolution. 2.On August 12, 2024, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.All construction shall follow the approved plans, date-stamped July 1, 2024. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2.The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval, or the permit shall become null and void. 3.The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4.A parking waiver of 47 spaces is approved. The project will provide 50 underground spaces and 15 surface spaces. If a parking shortage develops, the city council may require the construction of additional parking spaces. Council Packet Page Number 183 of 297 H1, Attachment 3 DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ashley Bisner, of JB Vang, has requested approval of design review to construct a four-story multi-family building. 1.02 The property is located at 1880 English Street North and is legally described as: PIN: 152922320077. The South 7 feet of Lot 7, and all of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 3, Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Abstract Property Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City Ordinance Section 44-512(4) requires a Conditional Use Permit for the exterior storage of goods or materials. City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1.That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2.That the design and location of the proposed development are in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and are not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3.That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. City Action 3.01 The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the design plans date-stamped July 1, 2024. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1.Obtain a conditional use permit from the city council for this project. 2.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 3.All fire marshal and building official requirements must be met. Council Packet Page Number 184 of 297 H1, Attachment 3 4.Satisfy the requirements set forth in the engineering review authored by Jon Jarosch, dated July 9, 2024 5. Satisfy the requirements set forth in the environmental review authored by Shann Finwall, dated July 8, 2024 6. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 7. Rooftop vents and equipment shall be located out of view from all sides of the property. 8. Any identification or monument signs for the project must meet the city's mixed- use sign ordinance requirements and be designed to be consistent with the project's building materials and colors. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a. The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. b. A revised photometric plan that meets city code requirements. c. A revised landscaping plan that meets the city's tree replacement requirements or pay into the city's tree fund. d. Elevations of the proposed trash enclosure that meet ordinance requirements. 10. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace any property irons that were removed because of this construction. b. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. c. Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d. Install all required outdoor lighting. e. Install all required sidewalks and trails. 11. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b. The City of Maplewood holds the above-required letter of credit or cash escrow for all required exterior improvements. If the building is occupied in Council Packet Page Number 185 of 297 H1, Attachment 3 the fall or winter, the owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year or within six weeks of occupancy if it is occupied in the spring or summer. 12.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Council Packet Page Number 186 of 297 Attachment 4 Overview Map - 1880 English Street North June 18, 2024 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Subject Parcel 0475 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Council Packet Page Number 187 of 297 Attachment 5 Future Land Use Map - 1880 English Street North June 18, 2024 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Future Land Use - 2040 Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Use - Neighborhood High Density Public/Institutional Open Space 0230 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Council Packet Page Number 188 of 297 Attachment 6 Zoning Map - 1880 English Street North June 18, 2024 City of Maplewood Legend Zoning Single Dwelling (r1) Multiple Dwelling (r3) Open Space/Park Mixed Use (mu) 0230 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Council Packet Page Number 189 of 297 Attachment 7 Council Packet Page Number 190 of 297 Attachment 7 Council Packet Page Number 191 of 297 Attachment 7 Council Packet Page Number 192 of 297 Attachment 8 Council Packet Page Number 193 of 297 Attachment 9 Council Packet Page Number 194 of 297 Attachment 9 Council Packet Page Number 195 of 297 Attachment 9 Council Packet Page Number 196 of 297 Attachment 10 Maplewood, MN 55109 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 1880 English St N. © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2024 JES JES 23-0010 Gladstone Village - Phase 2 06/07/2024 L140 BID / REVIEW SET LANDSCAPEPLAN CHECKED BY CONSULTANT BID / REVIEW SET 06.07.2024REVISIONSDATEPROJECT #PHASEDRAWN BY 310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.7522 LAND USE APPLICATION 06.18.2024 NORTH 30 20 10 1" = 10' SCALE: 0 RAMP DN TO GARAGE PROPERTY LINE P-01 5 - AL 26 - RH-G 5 - TH 4 - PA-N 6 - TH 8 - DL 1 - AM STALLS 11 - DL 15 SURFACE 1 - AM 5 - AL 46 - PA-N 12 - PA-N MM-02 SF-01 P-01 AT-01 P-02 56 UNIT _ MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1880 ENGLISH STREET NMAPLEWOOD, MN 12 - DL 6 - RH-G P-01 PATIO GLADSTONE VILLAGE - PHASE 2 12 - SC-M 2 - AL 6 - TN12 - TH SF-02 2 - AG 16 - PH-O 16 - PA-H 6 - PH-O 32 - TN P-01 18 - PA-H 9 - PI-P Xref ..\\4 Consultants\\Architect\\2024-04-05\\AL101_SITE PLAN.dwg ELECTRIC UTILITY 7 - PH-O 10 - TI-B P-01 ENGLISH STREET NORTH 8 - TN 11 - DL 4 - QW8 - RH-G 14 - PA-H 7 - TN 4 - QW 5 - QB 3 - BE-P 18 - TN 32 - PA-H Council Packet Page Number 197 of 297 Attachment 11 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: Gladstone Village II Apartments 1880 English Street PROJECT NO: 24-11 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Assistant City Engineer DATE: 7-9-2024 PLAN SET: Civil plans dated 6-7-2024 REPORTS: None The applicant is seeking city approval to develop a new four-story, 56-unit multi-family housing building and associated site amenities at 1880 English Street. The applicant is requesting a review of the current design along with the vacation of an existing utility easement. The amount of disturbance on this site is greater than ½ acre. As such, the applicant is required to meet the City’s stormwater quality, rate control, and other stormwater management requirements. The applicant is proposing to meet these requirements via the use of an underground infiltration system. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents and calculations for final review. The following are engineering review comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Drainage and Stormwater Management 1)A stormwater management plan shall be submitted, including hydraulic calculations, to depict how the project is meeting the City and Watershed District’s stormwater management standards. 2)The project shall be submitted to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) for review. All conditions of RWMWD shall be met. 3)A joint storm water maintenance agreement shall be prepared and signed by the owner for the proposed infiltration system and pretreatment devices. The Owner shall submit a signed copy of the joint storm-water maintenance agreement with the RWMWD to the City. 4)Geotechnical information (soil borings) shall be provided to support infiltration rates utilized in the infiltration system design. Council Packet Page Number 198 of 297 Attachment 11 5)Anemergency overflow forthe underground infiltration system shall be identified on the plans. This overflow shall be properly stabilized to prevent erosion during an overflow event. 6)The plans note that the trench drain at the bottom of the parking garage entrance ramp is to be connected to the building. Likewise, it is unclear where the building perimeter drain tile is connected. The plans shall detail the proposed connection point for these systems and ensure they are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. All storm water runoff shall be directed into the storm sewer system. Grading and Erosion Control 7)All slopes shall be 3H:1V or flatter. 8)Inlet protection devices shall be installed on all existing and proposed onsite storm sewer until all exposed soils onsite are stabilized. This includes storm sewer on adjacent streets that could potentially receive construction related sediment or debris. 9)Adjacent streets and parking areas shall be swept as needed to keep the pavement clear of sediment and construction debris. 10)All pedestrian facilities shall be ADA compliant. 11)The total grading volume (cut/fill) shall be noted on the plans. 12)A copy of the project SWPPP and NDPES Permit shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 13)The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project. A SAC determination is required. 14)All modifications to the water system shall be reviewed by Saint Paul regional Water Services. All requirements of SPRWS shall be met. 15)All new sanitary sewer service piping shall be schedule 40 PVC or SDR35. Other 16)An existing utility easement lies within the formerly vacated Ridge Street right-of-way along the east side of the property. There are no known public utilities lying within the requested easement vacation area. Likewise, the Engineering Department does not Council Packet Page Number 199 of 297 Attachment 11 foresee the need to extend public utilities into thiseasement area in the future. As such, Engineering does not have any concerns with the proposed vacation request. 17)All work within the English Street right-of-way shall be restored per the City’s right-of- way ordinance. Roadway patching shall occur within 48 hours after the completion of utility connections. 18)A public sidewalk easement shall be provided for those portions of the concrete sidewalk along English Street lying outside of the public right-of-way. 19)The plans shall be signed by a civil engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. 20)The applicant shall provide a self-renewing letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of 125% of the proposed site improvements including earthwork, grading, erosion control, site vegetation establishment (sod, seed, etc.), aggregate base, and paving. Public Works Permits The following permits are required by the Maplewood Public Works Department for this project. The applicant should verify the need for other City permits with the Building Department. 21)Right-of-way permit 22)Grading and erosion control permit 23)Storm Sewer Permit 24)Sanitary Sewer Permit -END COMMENTS - Council Packet Page Number 200 of 297 Attachment 12 Environmental Review Project: New 56-Unit Apartment Building Date of Plans: June 7, 2024 Date of Review: July 8, 2024 Location: 1880 English Street North Reviewers: Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner 651-249-2304, shann.finwall@maplewoodmn.gov Carole Gernes, Natural Resources Coordinator 651-249-2416, carole.gernes@maplewoodmn.gov Project Background: The applicant proposes to redevelop the existing manufactured home site located at 1880 English Street North with a 56-unit affordable apartment building. The applicant must comply with the Gladstone Area Redevelopment Plan, Green Building Code, solid waste ordinance, tree preservation ordinance, and landscape policies. Gladstone Area Redevelopment Neighborhood The Gladstone Area Redevelopment Plan details guiding principles, implementation initiatives, and key factors for shaping redevelopment of the Gladstone Neighborhood. Environmental items pertaining to the redevelopment of properties located along English Street, south of Frost Avenue include: Incorporation of rainwater gardens, alternative pavement strategies, shared parking, and other techniques to minimize surface water runoff and provide for treatment of runoff. Incorporation of recycled building materials, roof top gardens, solar energy systems, and other sustainable building techniques that contribute to the educational and interpretive vision of the Gladstone Savanna. Development should orient toward the regional trails rather than back up to them. Building heights should be greatest along English Street. Green Building Code The Green Building Code applies to Maplewood owned and financed buildings. The goal of the Green Building Code is to safeguard the environment, public health, safety and general welfare through the establishment of requirements to reduce the negative impacts and increase the positive impacts of the built environment on the natural environment and building occupants. Green Building Code Recommendation: If the Gladstone Village is approved for the use of Tax Increment Financing, the redevelopment of the site must comply with the Green Building Code and ensure sections in the Code are complete including 1) energy conservation, efficiency, and 2 COemission reductions; and 2) material resource conservation and efficiency standards. Council Packet Page Number 201 of 297 Attachment 12 Solid Waste Ordinance All multi-family properties are included in the City’s recycling program. The City of Maplewood contracts with Tennis Sanitation for multi-family recycling. Tennis Sanitation supplies 95-gallon recycling carts or recycling dumpsters collected weekly. The City of Maplewood adds the recycling fee onto the water bill. Solid Waste Recommendation: Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must ensure recycling service is set up through the City’s recycling program. Trees 1.Tree Preservation Ordinance: a.Significant Trees: Maplewood’s tree preservation ordinance describes a significant tree as a healthy tree of the following size: hardwood tree with a minimum of 6 inches in diameter, an evergreen tree with a minimum of 8 inches in diameter, and a softwood tree with a minimum of 12 inches in diameter. b.Specimen Trees: A specimen tree is defined as a healthy tree of any species that is 28 inches in diameter or greater. c.Tree Replacement: If greater than 20 percent of significant trees are removed, tree replacement is based on a calculation of significant trees located on the site and significant trees removed. Credits are given for all specimen trees that are preserved. If less than 20 percent of significant trees are removed, tree replacement is based on a calculation of one 2-caliper inch replacement tree per significant tree removed. d.Tree Replacement: The tree standards require that as many replacement trees be planted on the site as possible. An applicant can pay into the City’s tree fund at a rate of $60 per caliper inch for trees that cannot be planted on site. The City uses the tree fund to manage trees in parks and within the right-of-way. 2.Tree Impacts: a.Staff review: There are seven significant trees on the lot, and three significant trees on the English Street right-of-way that will be impacted by the development, for a total of 291 caliper inches of trees. The applicants propose to remove all but one tree, for a total of 279 caliper inches. This represents 96 percent tree removal. b.Applicant’s plans: The applicant’s plans are inconsistent with staff’s review. The tree plan identifies 279 caliper inches of trees on the site (including the three trees in the right-of-way), not 291 caliper inches of trees as identified in staff’s review above. 3.City Code Requirements: a.Staff review: Based on staff’s review of the tree impacts above, city code requires 309 caliper inches of replacement trees on the site (which equals 154 – 2 caliper inches of replacement trees). Council Packet Page Number 202 of 297 Attachment 12 b.Applicant’s plans: The applicant’s tree replacement calculation reflects 335 caliper inches of replacement trees. The tree replacement was calculated using the inaccurate information identified in 2.b. above. 4.Proposed Tree Replacement: The landscape plan shows 74 new trees. The size of trees range from 2.5 caliper inches to 12 feet in height. It is difficult to determine overall caliper inches of replacement trees when all tree sizes are not identified in caliper inches. Based on staff’s best estimate of overall caliper inches on the landscape plan, there is a total of 208.5 caliper inches of replacement trees being proposed, which is 100.5 caliper inches less than City code requires. 5.Tree Recommendations: a.Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant must submit the following: 1)Revised tree plan with the following changes: a)Ensure all significant trees removed from the lot and within the English Street right-of-way are listed in the tree legend and tree replacement calculation. 2)Revised landscape plan with the following changes: a)Replace the maple trees with a climate resilient native species. Maplewood's tree canopy consists of over 20 percent each of maple, ash and spruce. To diversify and prevent large future tree losses due to new pests or diseases, the City does not recommend planting trees from these genera. b)Replace the Whitespire Birch, Betula populifolia with River Birch, Betula nigra or Yellow Birch, Betula alleghaniensis which are considered climate resilient for our area. c)Replace the Ponderosa Pine, Pinus ponderosa, with a climate resilient, native White Pine, Pinus strobus. c)Planting an additional 100.5 caliper inches of replacement trees. The applicant should attempt to plant as many replacement trees on the lot as possible. If all required replacement trees cannot be planted on site the applicant can pay into the City’s tree fund at a rate of $60 per caliper inch. 3)Escrow: Tree escrow in the amount of $60 per caliper inch of trees to be replaced on the site. The escrow will be released once the trees are planted with a one-year warranty. Landscape Policies Review of the overall landscape plan to ensure nonnative and invasive species are avoided, seed mix is appropriate for use in areas proposed, and plantings are climate resilient. Council Packet Page Number 203 of 297 Attachment 12 Landscaping Recommendations: 1.Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant must submit a revised landscape plan with the following changes: a.Because the City of Maplewood is a Pollinator-Friendly City, we encourage the planting of native-pollinator-supporting plants. This is especially important on this lot, which is located across the street from the Gladstone Savanna Preserve which is managed as a prairie. Following is a list of native-pollinator supporting plants with a variety of bloom times and colors: 1)Sunny to part shade: Butterfly-weed, Asclepias tuberosa; Meadow blazing star, Liatris ligulistylis; Leadplant, Amorpha canescens; Wild lupine, Lupinus perennis; Cream indigo, Baptisia bracteata; Prairie smoke, Geum triflorum; Prairie phlox, Phlox pilosa; Aromatic aster, Symphyotrichum oblongifolium; Prairie coneflower, Ratibida columnifera; Black-eyed Susan, Rudbeckia hirta; Wild petunia, Ruellia humilis; Wild bergamot, Monarda fistulosa; Purple prairie clover, Dalea purpurea; Dotted blazingstar, Liatris punctata; Large beardtongue, Penstemon grandiflorus; Narrow-leaved purple coneflower, Echinacea angustifolia; and / or Spotted horsemint, Monarda punctata. 2)Shade: False lily of the valley, Jacob’s ladder, wild ginger, wild geranium, blood root, downy yellow violet, wild leek, rue anemone, false rue anemone, Canada violet, woodland phlox, wild strawberry, Maidenhair fern, Early meadow-rue; Round-lobed hepatica, sharp-lobed hepatica, Large-leaf aster, Columbine; Sensitive fern; Royal fern; Solomon’s seal; Trilliums; Virginia waterleaf, Hydrophyllum virginianum; Virginia bluebells, Mertensia virginica; Zig-zag goldenrod, Solidago flexicaulis, Sprengle’s sedge; Carex spengelii; Fringed sedge; Pennsylvania sedge, Carex pennsylvatica; Rosy sedge, Carex Rosii; Star sedge; Jack in the pulpit; Poke milkweed (not the same as pokeweed). b.Replace the Gro-Low sumac with a native pollinator-benefiting perennial such as butterflyweed, Asclepias tuberosa; Leadplant, Amorpha canescens; Butterfly Milkweed, Asclepias tuberosa; and Wild Lupine, Lupinus perennis are also good choices. c.Tree Protection: 1)Oak pruning may only be done during oak wilt safe dates, typically November through February. 2)Do not add 4 inches of shredded wood mulch in the tree protection area. With all of the rain we have had, soils are waterlogged and mulching may lead to root rot. Water the protected trees if drought conditions return. d.Planting Detail Information: 1)Detail Tree Planting: Council Packet Page Number 204 of 297 Attachment 12 o Strike “each tree shall be planted…visible at the top of the root ball. If the root flare is not visible” and replace with planting instructions which conform to the MN DNR Tree Planting Pocket Guide, attached, which was developed to prevent the growth of encircling, strangling roots from incorrect planting depths. Extra soil must be removed from the top of the burlap ball or container, until the top of the first major lateral root is visible. Encircling roots shall be pruned. Root bound trees should be pruned on 4 sides or be box cut. o Strike “expose root flare and set at grade.” The top of the first major lateral root should be visible at grade, not the root flare. o Mulch should be double shredded hardwood mulch in a 3-foot diameter around the tree, at a 3-inch depth, which is kept at least 3 inches away from the base of the trunk. 2)Detail Shrub Planting: o Use organic pre-emergent only. Preen has been shown to negatively affect pollinators. o Container grown material shall have roots hand loosened; add “or box-cut if root bound to prevent growth of encircling, strangling roots”. 3)Detail Perennial Planting: add “cut four sides and bottom of root bound roots and pull outward to prevent circling, strangling root growth.” Council Packet Page Number 205 of 297 Attachment 13 Council Packet Page Number 206 of 297 H1, Attachment 14 DRAFT MINUTES MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 6:00 P.M. Tuesday, July 16, 2024 City Hall, Council Chambers 1830 County Road B East E.NEW BUSINESS 1.Design Review Resolution, Gladstone Village II, 1880 English St N Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director, gave the presentation. Ashley Bisner, JB Vang, addressed the board and answered questions. Boardmember Lamers moved to approve a resolution for design review approving a four-story, 56-unit multifamily apartment project to be constructed at 1880 English Street North. DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ashley Bisner, of JB Vang, has requested approval of design review to construct a four-story multifamily building. 1.02 The property is located at 1880 English Street North and is legally described as: PIN: 152922320077. The South 7 feet of Lot 7, and all of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 3, Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Abstract Property Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City Ordinance Section 44-512(4) requires a Conditional Use Permit for the exterior storage of goods or materials. City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1.That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2.That the design and location of the proposed development are in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and are not detrimental to Council Packet Page Number 207 of 297 H1, Attachment 14 the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3.That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. City Action 3.01 The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the design plans date-stamped July 1, 2024. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1.Obtain a conditional use permit from the city council for this project. 2.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 3.All fire marshal and building official requirements must be met. 4.Satisfy the requirements set forth in the engineering review authored by Jon Jarosch, dated July 9, 2024 5.Satisfy the requirements set forth in the environmental review authored by Shann Finwall, dated July 8, 2024 6.The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 7.Rooftop vents and equipment shall be located out of view from all sides of the property. 8.Any identification or monument signs for the project must meet the city's mixed-use sign ordinance requirements and be designed to be consistent with the project's building materials and colors. 9.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a.The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. b.A revised photometric plan that meets city code requirements. c.A revised landscaping plan that meets the city’s tree replacement requirements or pay into the city’s tree fund. Council Packet Page Number 208 of 297 H1, Attachment 14 d.Elevations of the proposed trash enclosure that meet ordinance requirements. 10.The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a.Replace any property irons that were removed because of this construction. b.Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. c.Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d.Install all required outdoor lighting. e.Install all required sidewalks and trails. 11.If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a.The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b.The City of Maplewood holds the above-required letter of credit or cash escrow for all required exterior improvements. If the building is occupied in the fall or winter, the owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year or within six weeks of occupancy if it is occupied in the spring or summer. 12.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Boardmember Reinert Ayes – All The motion passed. Council Packet Page Number 209 of 297 Attachment 15 DRAFT MINUTES MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 7:00 P.M. Tuesday, July 16, 2024 City Hall, Council Chambers 1830 County Road B East E.PUBLIC HEARING 1.Conditional Use Permit Resolution, Gladstone Village II, 1880 English Street North Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director, gave the presentation and answered questions from the commission. Vice Chairperson Yang opened the public hearing. Ashley Bisner, JB Vang, addressed the commission and answered questions. Vice Chairperson Yang closed the public hearing. Commissioner Oszman moved to approve a resolution for a conditional use permit approving a four-story, 56-unit multifamily apartment project to be constructed at 1880 English Street North. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ashley Bisner, of JB Vang, has requested approval of a conditional use permit to permit a four-story multifamily building. 1.02 The property is located at 1880 English Street North and is legally described as: PIN: 152922320077. The South 7 feet of Lot 7, and all of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 3, Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Abstract Property Section 2. Standards. 2.01 City Ordinance Section 44-512(4) requires a Conditional Use Permit for the exterior storage of goods or materials. 2.02 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. City Ordinance Section 44-1097(a) states that the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine standards for approval. Council Packet Page Number 210 of 297 Attachment 15 1.The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2.The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3.The use would not depreciate property values. 4.The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5.The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. 6.The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7.The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8.The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and scenic features into the development design. 9.The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The proposal meets the specific conditional use permit standards. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this conditional use permit request. 1.On July 16, 2024, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this resolution. 2.On August 12, 2024, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council Council Packet Page Number 211 of 297 Attachment 15 5.01The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.All construction shall follow the approved plans, date-stamped July 1, 2024. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2.The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval, or the permit shall become null and void. 3.The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4.A parking waiver of 47 spaces is approved. The project will provide 50 underground spaces and 15 surface spaces. If a parking shortage develops, the city council may require the construction of additional parking spaces. Seconded by Commissioner Ige Ayes – All The motion passed. This item will go to the city council on August 12, 2024 Council Packet Page Number 212 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 I I t e e e g r t a l S l i h V s i l e g n n o t E s 0 d 1.15 AcresEasement Vacation (4 Votes)Conditional Use PermitDesign Review a8 ¤¤¤¤ l JB Vang proposes to developGladstone Village II, a 56-unitaffordable multifamilyapartment projectRequesting approval for: 8 G1¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 213 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 I I t e e e g r t a l S l i h V s i l e g n n o t E s 0 d a8 l 56-unit affordable multifamilyapartment projectSite is guided Mixed-Use ÏNeighborhood High Density,which allows up to 50 unitsper acreSite is zoned Mixed Use, whichallows 4-story multifamilyhousing projects with theapproval of a conditional usepermit 8 G1¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 214 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 I I t e e e g r t a l S l i h V s i l e g n n o t E s 0 d a8 l No utilities are located in theeasementNo utilities are planned for theeasementSupports request to vacate 8 ¤¤¤ G1 Vacation of Unused EasementCityÔs engineering dept reviewedNeighbor (Ramsey County)supports request but did not signa petition ¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 215 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 I I t e e e g r t a l S l i h V s i l e g n n o t E s 0 d a8 Building on north side of siteParking required to be to the rearBuilding 0-20 front yard; 0 side andrearParking lot five feet from side andrear l 8 ¤¤¤¤ G1 Project site accessed from a singledrive coming off English Street onthe west sideThe new building and parking lotmeet all setback requirements ¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 216 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 I I t e e e g r t a l S l i h V s i l e g n n o t E s 0 d Primary materials ÏBrick and glassSecondary materials ÏStucco andmasonryAccent ÏMetal panels a8 ¤¤¤ l 8 The proposed building will beconstructed with a combination ofWalls longer than 40 feet must bearticulated in segments of 20-40feetFourth floor of this project kicks inthe CUP Ïapproximately 46 feet G1 ¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 217 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 I I t e e e g r t a l S l i h V s i l e g n n o t E s 0 d Half of the parking spaces being covered112 spaces for this project; 65 provided a8 l ¤¤ 8 Per Code, multi-family buildings must provide two parking spaces for each unitApplicant seeks a total parking waiver of 47 spaces which includes one space from the covered parking requirementApplican t submitted a summary of a traffic study and relayed examples of two other projects G1 ¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 218 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 I I t e e e g r t a l S l i h V s i l e g n n o t E s 0 d Likely to not have a vehicleThe project then has a similar parking ratio as the Phase IRoute 64Connections to Maplewood Mall, Grocery Stores and Downtown a8 l ¤¤¤¤ 8 Applicant states that 14 of the units will be supportive housingMultigenerational HousingTransit AccessThe Institute of Transportation EngineersÔ Parking Generation Manualrecommends 0.65 spaces per affordable unit Ï37 spaces for this project G1 ¤¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 219 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 I I t e e e g r t a l S l i h V s i l e g n n o t E s 0 d Applicant is proposing 74 new trees a8 ¤ l 8 Applicant is proposing to remove 9 of the 10 significant trees on siteCode requires the planting of 154 treesApplicant is required to provide a revised landscape plan adding more trees or pay into the cityÔs tree fund G1 ¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 220 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 w e i v t e e R e r n t o S i s h s i s i l m g n m E o C 0 8 d 8 n 1 a , I I t n e e g a m l l i m V o e C n c i o l t b s u d One comment was received Ïincluded in the staff reportBoth groups recommended approval P a¤¤ l CDRB and Planning Commission, July 16, 2024 Staff sent a public hearing notice to properties within 500 feet - G¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 221 of 297 H1, Attachment 16 f f t a t e S e r / t S w h e i s i v l e g R n l E i c 0 n 8 u 8 1 o , C I I d n e n o g i a t a l l a n i d o V i n s e se i n m m o t m s m o d o c a lC e G-R Council Packet Page Number 222 of 297 J1 CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM: Elizabeth Hammond, Planner PRESENTER:Danette Parr, Community Development Director Hampton Companies, 2694 Maplewood Drive North AGENDA ITEM: a. Conditional Use Permit Resolution b. Design Review Resolution Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: Hampton Companies proposes constructing a 4,500-square-foot office and warehouse building at 2694 Maplewood Drive North, a vacant property. The applicant operates a real estate and construction company in White Bear Lake. Their roofing and siding division would use the proposed building as office space, and a portion would be used for storage. To proceed with this project, the applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit and design review. Recommended Action: a. Motion to approve a resolution for a conditional use permit approving the construction of an office and warehouse building at 2694 Maplewood Drive North, subject to conditions of approval. b. Motion to approve a resolution for design review approving the construction of an office and warehouse building at 2694 Maplewood Drive North, subject to conditions of approval. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness Targeted Redevelopment The city deemed the applicant's application complete on July 1, 2024. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is August 30, 2024. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city can take an additional 60 days, if necessary, to complete the review and make a decision. Council Packet Page Number 223 of 297 J1 Background: Hampton Companies LLC (applicant) proposes constructing a 4,500-square-foot office and warehouse building on the subject property. The applicant operates a real estate and construction company in White Bear Lake, and the proposed building in Maplewood would be an expansion for the company. Their roofing and siding division would use the building as office space, and a portion would be used for storage. Conditional Use Permit The property is in the M1 light manufacturing zoning district, and the proposed use is permitted. The manufacturing zoning district requires a conditional use permit for any building or use within 350 feet of residentially zoned property. The subject property is adjacent to a single-dwelling residential home and neighborhood to the east. Design Review Site Plan The proposed building would be situated in the center of the parcel, and the site will be accessed off Maplewood Drive. The building is required to be 30 feet from a street right-of-way and 50 feet from a residential lot line. The building is shown to be setback 60 feet from the street ROW along Maplewood Drive to the west and 90 feet from the residential lot line to the east. Parking The parking lot must be 15 feet from the street right-of-way, 5 feet from all other property lines, and 20 feet from a residential lot line. The site plan shows two parking areas, one in front of the building on the west side and one behind the building on the east side of the parcel. Both parking areas are 20 feet from the east and west property lines. The parking area in the rear will be enclosed with a slat gate at the rear northeast corner of the building and used for employees. Parking spaces are required to be 9.5 feet wide and 18 feet long, and the drive aisle must be 24 feet wide. The six stalls in the front parking area are 9.5 feet wide, and the eight stalls in the rear parking area are shown at 9 feet wide. The city's parking code allows for stall width and length reduction for employee parking, provided the stalls are marked for employees. The parking area is behind the building and will be closed off from general access with a gate. The drive aisles are shown to be 24 feet in width near the parking stalls, but the access drive running across the site's north end narrows to 16 feet in width. The Fire Marshal reviewed the plans, and the width of 16 feet is approved, providing the building has a fire sprinkler system installed and the north side of the building near the rear gate has access through the door. Both these items will be achieved. The Fire Marshall further stated that given the size of the building and site, there would not be a need to access the back half of the site with a fire truck. City code requires one stall for every 200 square feet of office space and one stall for every 1,250 square feet of warehouse space. Thus, the site is required to provide 11 stalls overall. The site plan shows 14 stalls provided, meeting this requirement. The applicant has indicated that employees will primarily use the site for this division of their business. Customers may visit the front offices, but this would be less frequent, and the front parking area would be utilized for customers. Council Packet Page Number 224 of 297 J1 Building Elevations The proposed building footprint is 4,500 square feet, one story, and divided into two areas. The front portion, 1,740 square feet, would be used as office space for employees, and the back portion, 2,760 square feet, would be used as a warehouse. The building's overall height is 19.8 feet. Above the office area, a 1,740-square-foot future storage area or upper mezzanine is shown; however, this will require further review by the city's building official if this is pursued in the future to ensure it meets the building code. The primary exterior building materials combine LP smart siding and LP shakes with a stone base and architectural shingles. The primary colors will be shades of gray and black. An extensive retaining wall system surrounds the back half of the site, bordering the entire east and apportions the north and south property lines. The applicant proposes a vinyl chain-link fence above the retaining wall. The applicant must submit additional elevation details on the vinyl chain-link fence showing the height, materials, colors, and opaqueness before a building permit is issued. Landscaping and Screening The applicant proposes to plant trees and various shrubs on the site. Overall, the environmental review details inconsistencies with the proposed tree removal and preservation plan, the need for additional tree plantings, preserving some of the trees proposed to be removed, and exchanging some of the proposed tree and shrub plantings for native or pollinator-friendly plantings. The applicant must incorporate the requirements outlined in the environmental review, and submit an updated landscape plan before grading and building permits will be issued. Trash Enclosure The applicant has identified a location for a trash enclosure within the fenced-in back portion of the property. Since the area behind the building will be screened entirely with an extensive retaining wall and solid fence, the community design review board waived the enclosure requirement in this location. The code allows the board to waive this requirement when the trash receptacles are hidden from view of adjacent properties and streets. Lighting The applicant submitted a photometric site plan as part of its application. The site plan meets the code requirements for permitted light spread and foot-candle levels. Department Comments Building Official – Randy Johnson The proposed building must meet the minimum requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, and the plans must be updated to meet the 2024 Commercial Energy Code requirements. Environmental Planner – Shann Finwall, Natural Resources Coordinator – Carole Gernes The applicant must meet the environmental review requirements dated July 5, 2024. Assistant City Engineer – Jon Jarosch The applicant must meet the engineering review requirements dated July 8, 2024. Council Packet Page Number 225 of 297 J1 Commission Review Community Design Review Board July 16, 2024: The community design review board reviewed this project and recommended approval of the design plans. Planning Commission July 16, 2024: The planning commission reviewed this project and held a public hearing. The commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit. Citizen Comments Staff sent public hearing notices to the surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site. Staff did not receive any written comments. One phone message was received. The caller stated that they lived in the neighborhood and were in favor of the proposal, as shown, would be an improvement and meet the zoning for the property. They stated they would like to see something done with the property, referring to the rotting retaining wall and overgrown trees and shrubs. Reference Information Site Description Project Area: 0.48 Acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses North: Commercial/Retail East: Residential Single Dwellings South: Commercial/Medical Office West: Maplewood Drive/Highway 61 Planning Existing Land Use: Commercial Existing Zoning: M1 – Light Manufacturing Attachments: 1.Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2.Design Review Resolution 3.Overview Map 4.2040 Future Land Use Map 5.Zoning Map 6.Applicant's Narrative 7.Site and Landscape Plans 8.Building Elevations and Floorplan 9.Site Rendering Perspectives 10.Engineering Review, dated July 8, 2024 11.Environmental Review, dated July 5, 2024 12.Draft CDRB Minutes, July 16, 2024 13.Draft Planning Commission Minutes, July 16, 2024 14.Presentation Slides Council Packet Page Number 226 of 297 J1 15.Applicant’s Plans (separate attachment) Council Packet Page Number 227 of 297 J1, Attachment 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Hampton Companies LLC has requested a Conditional Use Permit for the property located at 2694 Maplewood Drive North. 1.02 The property located at 2694 Maplewood Drive North is legally described as: That part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 477, which lies Southerly of a line parallel with the South line of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, and 120.55 feet South of the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Kohlmans Lakeview Addition. AND That part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 477, lying Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, thence Southerly along the Westerly line of Lot 6, 120.55 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Westerly parallel to the South line of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, to the Westerly line of Tract C and said line terminating. Tax Parcel Identification: 042922440044 1.03 City Ordinance Division 14. Section 44-272 requires a conditional use permit for any building or use in the M1 zoning district within 350 feet of residentially zoned property. Section 2. Standards. 2.01 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. City Ordinance Section 44-1097(a) states that the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine standards for approval. 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. Council Packet Page Number 228 of 297 J1, Attachment 1 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The proposal meets the specific Conditional Use Permit standards. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this conditional use permit request. 1. On July 16, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. City staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this resolution. 2. On August 12, 2024, the City Council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and City staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The City Council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the approved plans stamped July 1, 2024. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be started within one year of council approval, or the permit shall become null and void. 3. The city council will review the permit in one year. 4. The property will meet the requirements of the council-approved design review resolution dated August 12, 2024. 5. All signs shall meet the City of Maplewood sign ordinance. The property owner will obtain sign permits as required. Council Packet Page Number 229 of 297 J1, Attachment 1 6.Screening along the property's east property line adjacent to the residentially zoned property must be maintained as required by city ordinance. 7.The site's trash receptacles are not required to be within an enclosure if they are located behind the building and within the fenced-in parking area, accessible by a self-closing locked gate at all times. The gate must be shut when not in use, and the dumpsters cannot be visible from the public right-of-way. If they are located elsewhere on the site, the trash receptacles must be screened and located within an enclosure per code requirements. Council Packet Page Number 230 of 297 J1, Attachment 2 DESIGN REVIEWRESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Hampton Companies LLC has requested approval of design review to construct an office and warehouse building on the property located at 2694 Maplewood Drive North. 1.02 The property located at 2694 Maplewood Drive North is legally described as: That part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 477, which lies Southerly of a line parallel with the South line of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, and 120.55 feet South of the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Kohlmans Lakeview Addition. AND That part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 477, lying Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, thence Southerly along the Westerly line of Lot 6, 120.55 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Westerly parallel to the South line of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, to the Westerly line of Tract C and said line terminating. Tax Parcel Identification: 042922440044 Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development are in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and are not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. City Council Action. 3.01 The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the design plans. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: Council Packet Page Number 231 of 297 J1, Attachment 2 1.Obtain a conditional use permit from the city council for this project. 2. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 3. All requirements of the fire marshal, city engineer, and building official must be met. 4. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) must review the proposed project. The applicant is responsible for meeting any MnDOT review requirements. 5. Satisfy the requirements in the engineering review authored by Jon Jarosch, dated July 9, 2024. 6. Satisfy the requirements set forth in the environmental review authored by Shann Finwall, dated July 5, 2024 7. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 8. Rooftop vents and any mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view from all sides of the property and screened as required by city ordinance. 9. The site's trash receptacles are not required to be within an enclosure if they are located behind the building and within the fenced-in parking area, accessible by a self-closing locked gate at all times. The gate must be shut when not in use, and the dumpsters cannot be visible from the public right-of-way. If they are located elsewhere on the site, the trash receptacles must be screened and located within an enclosure per code requirements 10. This resolution approves the 16-foot-wide drive aisle along the site's north end, as approved by the city's Fire Marshal. The drive aisle is approved as long as the door, as shown on the plan, remains on the building's north side for fire access and that the building has a fire sprinkler system installed. 11. This resolution approves the site's east side employee parking stalls in the fenced-in parking lot to be 9 feet wide. This parking area must be signed for employee parking only. 12. This approval does not include signage. Any signs for the project must meet the city's ordinance requirements, and the applicant must apply for a sign permit before installation. 13. Before the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a. The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. Council Packet Page Number 232 of 297 J1, Attachment 2 b.Before a building permit is issued, the applicant must submit additional elevation details on the proposed fence showing the height, materials, colors, and opaqueness. Staff must also approve the final design and materials. c. The applicant must incorporate the requirements outlined in the environmental review and submit an updated tree and landscape plan. 14. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. c. Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d. Install all required outdoor lighting. e. Install all required sidewalks and trails. 15. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 16. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Council Packet Page Number 233 of 297 , Attachment 3 Council Packet Page Number 234 of 297 , Attachment 4 Tvckfdu!Qbsdfm Council Packet Page Number 235 of 297 , Attachment 5 Tvckfdu!Qbsdfm Council Packet Page Number 236 of 297 , Attachment 6 PROPOSEDOFFICE LOCATED AT 2694 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE, MAPLEWOOD, MN Hampton Companies has learned a few things about business and real estate. We absolutely know that you can’t buy a good reputation, but you do have to work hard at it. For over 20 years we have been committed to developing real estate where we are buying raw land and developing it and broker thereal estate projects. Thefoundation of our company is a reputation for careful planning, attention to detail, and cost control that benefits the landowner, the community, and homebuyers. Currently we are based in White BearLake,Minnesotaand looking forward toexpandinginto a new office at 2694 Maplewood Drive, Maplewood, MN. Hampton Companies develops real estate, sells real estate,and has a roofing and siding division which will all be located at the above-listedaddress. The site is approximately 21,096 sq feet. We are proposing a building footprint of 4,500 square feet with a lower-level office of 1,740square feetwhich will take up approx. 21.3% of the property. The driveway, sidewalks and 13 parking stalls take up 9,479sf, approximately 44.9% of the property leaving 7126sf, approximately 33.8% of green space. The eight parking stalls at the rear of the building will be for employeeparkingofcars andpickup trucks. The exterior will bea combination ofLP smart siding, LP shakes and stone (see attached rendering). Siding colors will beQuarry Graywith black trim, shakecolor will be Tundra Gray, stone will be Cultured Stone Southern Ledgestone. Shingles will be asphalt architectural style and black in color.The trash area is located in the back North East cornerof the property surrounded by threesides of retaining walls with very low visibility. All retain walls over threefeet in height will have a chain link fence on top of the wall for safety. Hampton will notbestoringany building materials outside, there will be some company vehicles in the back of the property parked overnight in a secured gate area. Council Packet Page Number 237 of 297 , Attachment 7 Council Packet Page Number 238 of 297 , Attachment 7 ap 11 JUNE 2024 L 1.0 45071 MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 LIC. No: 2694 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE PLAN STATE OF MINNESOTA CORPORATE OFFICE LANDSCAPE LAWS OF THE JAMES A. KALKES HAMPTON COMPANIES l:\\00_ dreamscapes\\design projects 2024\\jim\\commercial\\hampton\\hampton corperate office\\02-drawings\\cad\\hampton campus - landsc I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE 06/27/24 REVDESCRIPTION DATE NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: Save Date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fBMR 3401)> 180 NJ?L 8" 2-NJW LWJML QRP?NQBMS@JC QRP?LB 12 E?SEC UGPCN?GLRCB DJSMPCQACLR MP?LECUFGRC DJ?EEGLE (RWN.)RPCC UP?NNjaeYjq jgglk k`Ydd Z\] Yl^afak`\]\\ _jY\\\]4" F?PBUMMB KSJAF &4" BCCN Q?SACP8' QRCCJ RCCNMQR-3 PCOSGPCB ?R 120@?AIDGJJ KGV SLBGQRSP@CBQS@QMGJPCKMTC @SPJ?N & PMNC DPMKRMN 1/3 MD RFC @?JJ 2' KGL.RM N?TCBQSPD?AC BM J A BM LMR ASR ? JC?BCP. 6" 12" 6"6" 2'(KGL.) QMGJ 1. QA?PGDW @MRRMK ?LB QGBCQ MD FMJCNPGMP RM NJ?LRGLE2. RPGK MSR BC?B UMMB ?LB UC?I ?LB/MPBCDMPKCB RUGEQ. LMR N?GLR ASRQ.3. QCR NJ?LR ML SLBGQRSP@CB L?RGTC QMGJMP RFMPMSEFJW AMKN?ARCB @?AIDGJJ QMGJ.GLQR?JJ NJ?LR QM RFC PMMR DJ?PC GQ ?R MPSN RM 2" ?@MTC RFC DGLGQFCB EP?BC.4. NJ?AC NJ?LR GL NJ?LRGLE FMJC UGRF@SPJ?N ?LB UGPC @?QICR, (GD SQCB), GLR?AR.@?AIDGJJ UGRFGL ?NNPMVGK?RCJW 12" MD RFCRMN MD PMMR@?JJ, U?RCP NJ?LR. PCKMTCRMN 1/3MD RFC @?QICR MP RFC RMN RUMFMPGXMLR?J PGLEQ, UFGAFCTCP GQ EPC?RCP.PCKMTC ?JJ @SPJ?N ?LB L?GJQ DPMK RMN1/3 MD RFC @?JJ. PCKMTC ?JJ RUGLC.5. NJSK@ ?LB @?AIDGJJ UGRF@?AIDGJJ QMGJ.6. U?RCP RM QCRRJC NJ?LRQ ?LB DGJJTMGBQ.7. U?RCP UGRFGL RUM FMSPQ MDGLQR?JJ?RGML. U?RCPGLE KSQR @CQSDDGAGCLR RM RFMPMSEFJW Q?RSP?RCPMMR @?JJ ?LB NJ?LRGLE FMJC.8. NJ?AC KSJAF UGRFGL 48 FMSPQ MDRFC QCAMLB U?RCPGLE SLJCQQ QMGJKMGQRSPC GQ CVACQQGTC. LMRC: QCC NJ?LRGLE LMRCQ DMP RFC RWNC MD KSJAF K?RCPG?J RM SQC.NdYflaf_ \\\]hl`: Rj\]\]k k`Ydd Z\] afklYdd\]\\ kg hjaeYjq jgglk Yj\] Yl ^afak`\]\\ _jY\\\]. \\gfgl hdYfl lgg \\\]\]hdq gj lj\]\]k k`Ydd Z\] j\]b\]\[l\]\\ Yf\\ oadd j\]imaj\] \[gjj\]\[lagfk.QR?IGLE ?LB ESWGLE - GQ ?R RFC \\\]\[j\]lagf MD RFC AMLRP?ARMP SLBCP RFC U?PP?LRW NCPGMB. SLBGQRSP@CB NMJW DGL?J CBECP EP?BC From the Tree Preservation Plan - add 6 DBH replacement. Council Packet Page Number 239 of 297 , Attachment 7 Council Packet Page Number 240 of 297 J1, Attachment 8 Council Packet Page Number 241 of 297 , Attachment 8 Council Packet Page Number 242 of 297 Attachment 9 Council Packet Page Number 243 of 297 , Attachment 9 Council Packet Page Number 244 of 297 Attachment 9 Council Packet Page Number 245 of 297 , Attachment 9 Council Packet Page Number 246 of 297 , Attachment 10 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: Hampton Companies Office and Warehouse Building 2694 Maplewood Drive PROJECT NO: 24-10 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Assistant City Engineer DATE: 7-8-2024 PLAN SET: Civil plans dated 6-25-2024 The applicant is seeking city approval to construct an approximately 4,775 square-foot office and warehouse building, along with associated site amenities, at 2694 Maplewood Drive. The applicant is requesting a review of the current design. The amount of disturbance on this site is less than ½ acre and the amount of new or disturbed impervious surfacing is less than 5,000 square feet. As such, the project is not required to meet the City’s stormwater quality requirements. The site as proposed utilizes porous pavement and a rock chamber beneath to keep the site impervious below 5,000 square feet of impervious. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents and calculations for final review. The following are engineering review comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Grading and Erosion Control 1)Inlet protection devices shall be installed on all existing and proposed onsite storm sewer until all exposed soils onsite are stabilized. This includes storm sewer on adjacent access drives and parking areas that could potentially receive construction related sediment or debris. 2)Adjacent drives, roads, and parking areas shall be swept as needed to keep the pavement clear of sediment and construction debris. 3)The total grading volume (cut/fill) shall be noted on the plans. 4)The proposed retaining wall exceeds 4-feet in height. As such, this wall will require an engineered design as well as a building permit. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 5)The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC or WAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project. A SAC determination is required. Council Packet Page Number 247 of 297 J1, Attachment 10 6)All modifications to the water system shall be reviewed by Saint Paul regional Water Services. All requirements of SPRWS shall be met. Other: 7)Minimum drive aisle width is 24-feet. The plan currently calls for a 16-foot drive aisle accessing the rear of the property. It is understood that the rear parking area will only be used by employees. The applicant shall provide information depicting the adequacy of the 16-foot drive aisle for the type of vehicles expected to access the rear of the building. Public Works Permits The following permits are required by the Maplewood Public Works Department for this project. The applicant should verify the need for other City permits with the Building Department. 8)Grading and erosion control permit 9)Storm Sewer Permit 10)Sanitary Sewer Permit -END COMMENTS - Council Packet Page Number 248 of 297 Attachment 11 Environmental Review Project: Hampton Companies Date of Plans: June 11, 2024 Date of Review: July 5, 2024 Location: 2694 Maplewood Drive Reviewer: Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner, shann.finwall@maplewoodmn.gov, 651-249-2304 Carole Gernes, Natural Resources Coordinator, carole.gernes@maplewoodmn.gov, 651-249-2416 Project Background: Hampton Companies is proposing to construct an office/warehouse building on a vacant lot located at 2684 Maplewood Drive. The lot is located in the Shoreland Overlay District of Kohlman Lake and includes significant trees. The development must comply with the City’s Shoreland Overlay District ordinance, Tree Preservation ordinance, and landscape policies. Shoreland Overlay District 1.Shoreland Overlay District Ordinance: The lot is located in the Shoreland Overlay District of Kohlman Lake. Kohlman Lake is classified as a Class IV water. The maximum amount of impervious surface allowed on a lot within this district is 30 percent, with bonuses up to 50 percent with the installation of approved stormwater management best management practices. 2.Shoreland Overlay District Impacts: The lot is 21,906 square feet in area. The plans are conflicting: The civil plan identifies the development of the lot to include 13,979 square feet of hard surface including the building, pervious asphalt, and concrete walks (36 percent impervious surface, which is 6 percent over the allowed 30 percent). The project narrative states there will be 44 percent impervious surface (which is 14 percent over the allowed 30 percent). The site plan reflects 8,845 square feet of porous pavement, rather than asphalt pavement as shown on the civil plans, if this is installed it will likely count toward an impervious surface bonus on the lot. 3.Shoreland Overlay District Recommendations: The applicant must submit revised plans which accurately show the impervious surface coverage area on the lot. If the impervious surface is between 31 to 50 percent, the applicant must show stormwater management best practices that meet the City’s impervious surface bonus allowances. Trees 1.Tree Preservation Ordinance: a.Significant Trees: Maplewood’s tree preservation ordinance describes a significant tree as a healthy tree of the following size: softwood tree with a minimum of 12 inches in diameter, an evergreen tree with a minimum of 8 inches in diameter, and a hardwood tree with a minimum of 6 inches in diameter. A Council Packet Page Number 249 of 297 Attachment 11 softwood tree is defined as a box elder, cottonwood, elm, poplar/aspen, silver maple, and willow; an evergreen tree is defined as a woody plant that is a member of the division Pinophyta and at maturity is at least 12 feet or more in height; and a hardwood tree is defined as all deciduous tree species except those listed as softwood deciduous trees. b.Specimen Trees: A specimen tree is defined as a healthy tree of any species that is 28 inches in diameter or greater. c.Tree Replacement: If greater than 20 percent of significant trees are removed, tree replacement is based on a calculation of significant trees located on the site and significant trees removed. Credits are given for all specimen trees that are preserved. If less than 20 percent of significant trees are removed, tree replacement is based on a calculation of one 2-caliper inch replacement tree per significant tree removed. d.Tree Replacement: The tree standards require that as many replacement trees be planted on the site as possible. An applicant can pay into the City’s tree fund at a rate of $60 per caliper inch for trees that cannot be planted on site. The City uses the tree fund to manage trees in parks and within the right-of-way. 2.Tree Impacts: The plans are conflicting: The tree preservation plan identifies 38 trees on the lot, all of which are in “poor” condition, not considered significant trees, and are all scheduled for removal. The tree calculation identifies that 98.4 caliper inches of replacement trees are required, even though the tree preservation plan states that none of the trees are significant. Staff identifies that nine of the trees are defined as significant trees, equaling 151 caliper inches 3.Tree Replacement Requirements: The City’s tree preservation ordinance would require 181.2 caliper inches of replacement trees if staff’s interpretation of the tree plan is accurate. 4.Tree Replacement: The landscape plan shows 10 new trees equaling 19.5 caliper inches. This is 161.7 caliper inches less than required by the City’s tree preservation ordinance. 5.Tree Recommendations: a.Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant must submit the following: 1)Revised tree plan with the following clarifications noted and changes made: a)Ensure all significant trees are reflected accurately per the City’s tree preservation ordinance definition. b)The City will need additional information on trees identified as in “poor” condition or considered a “nuisance” tree. If these trees are unhealthy and not included in the tree replacement calculation, additional information is needed on the health of the trees, whether the trees have a suspected disease or are unhealthy for other reasons. Council Packet Page Number 250 of 297 Attachment 11 c)Identify if the elm trees are Siberian Elm trees. If so, the City’s tree standards identify them as non-native and invasive and they can be removed from the tree replacement calculation. d)Cottonwood trees are not considered invasive trees and should be identified as a significant tree if the tree is healthy and the size is 12 caliper inches or greater. e)The 12-caliper inch walnut tree should be identified as a significant tree, unless the tree is unhealthy. Having a lean to the tree does not qualify the tree as unhealthy. f)Update the tree replacement calculations based on accurate information outlined above. g)The tree plan includes a diagram for tree protection fencing, however, no trees are being preserved. Remove the diagram or identify on the tree list which of the significant trees will be preserved. 2)Revised landscape plan with the following changes made: a)Replace the Northwoods Maple trees with a climate resilient native species. Maplewood's tree canopy consists of over 20 percent each of maple, ash and spruce. To diversify and prevent large future tree losses due to new pests or diseases, the City does not recommend planting trees from these genera. b)Replace the Japanese Tree Lilac with a climate resilient native pollinator-supporting species such as blue beech, serviceberry, hawthorn, Eastern redbud, or American plum. Japanese Tree Lilac trees have recently been found to be invasive in several areas of Minnesota. c)Planting an additional 161.7 caliper inches of replacement trees. The applicant should attempt to plant as many replacement trees on the site as possible. If all required replacement trees cannot be planted on site, the applicant can pay into the City’s tree fund at a rate of $60 per caliper inch. 3)Escrow: Tree escrow in the amount of $60 per caliper inch of trees to be replaced on the site. The escrow will be released once the trees are planted with a one-year warranty. Overall Landscaping Review of the overall landscape plan to ensure nonnative and invasive species are avoided, seed mix is appropriate for use in areas proposed, and plantings are climate resilient. Landscaping Recommendations: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant must submit the following: Council Packet Page Number 251 of 297 , Attachment 11 a.Revised landscape plan with the following clarifications noted and changes made: 1)Because the City of Maplewood is a Pollinator-Friendly City, we encourage the planting of native-pollinator-supporting native plants. 2)Tree and shrub planting and staking details: a)All details (A, B and A) should conform to the MN DNR’s Pocket Guide to Tree Planting. Highlights include: 1.Nurseries add extra soil added to pots and ball & burlap trees and shrubs. This extra soil should be removed with a trowel until the top of the first major lateral root is visible. Plant to this level so that the top of the first major lateral root is at grade. Planting deeper than this will promote the growth of encircling, strangling roots. 2.Encircling roots should be pruned with a pruner. 3.Root-bound trees and shrubs should be box-cut using a sharp shovel. 4.Mulch should be double-shredded hardwood mulch, applied in a 3-foot diameter circle around trees, at a 3-inch- depth and kept 3 inches away from the base of the trunk. No mulch volcanoes. 5.Trees and shrubs should not be pruned the first year after planting, except for dead branches. Pruning crossing branches and for structure / form should wait until year two after planting. 6.After placing ball and burlap trees in the hole, remove the top 1/3 of the burlap, along with any wire or string. If burlap is a synthetic material, it all should be removed. 7.Staking with flexible stakes and twine or rope instead of wire will allow some movement in wind, promoting development of strong trunks. Do not use wire to attach tree to stakes. Flexible rubber ties are less likely to damage bark. 8.Do not use duct tape or any other substance to adhere tree wrap onto trees. It will damage the bark. 3)Plantings – replace the following invasive plants with native, non-invasive alternatives: a)Burning bush, Euonymus alatus and its cultivars are listed as Minnesota Noxious Weeds. Replace with a native pollinator- supporting species such as Eastern Wahoo, Euonymus atropurpureus; Ninebark, Physocarpus opulifolius; Hazelnut, Corylus americana; chokeberry, Aronia melanocarpa; or a native dogwood, Cornus racemosa (gray dogwood) or red-osier dogwood Cornus sericea. b)Japanese spirea exhibits invasive tendencies. Replace with a native flowering shrub or a pink-flowered yarrow cultivar, Achillea millefolium. Council Packet Page Number 252 of 297 Attachment 11 4)General Landscape Comments a)Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low' traps litter and is difficult to maintain. Replace with bush honeysuckle, Diervilla lonicera or blueberry, Vaccinium ssp. b)Karl Foerster grass is overused and provides little benefit to pollinators. Native yellow prairie grass (formerly Indian grass), Sorghastrum nutans; switch grass, Panicum virgatum; big bluestem, Andropogon gerardii; and little bluestem, Schizachyrium scoparium are good native plant alternatives that support pollinators. c)You do not include any native pollinator supporting plants in your perennial plantings. Replace or supplement the catmint and day lilies with one or more of the following native flowering perennials: Butterfly-weed, Asclepias tuberosa Meadow blazing star, Liatris ligulistylis Leadplant, Amorpha canescens Wild lupine, Lupinus perennis Cream indigo, Baptisia bracteata Prairie smoke, Geum triflorum Prairie phlox, Phlox pilosa Aromatic aster, Symphyotrichum oblongifolium Prairie coneflower, Ratibida columnifera Black-eyed Susan, Rudbeckia hirta Wild petunia, Ruellia humilis Wild bergamot, Monarda fistulosa Purple prairie clover, Dalea purpurea Dotted blazingstar, Liatris punctata Large beardtongue, Penstemon grandiflorus Narrow-leaved purple coneflower, Echinacea angustifolia Spotted horsemint, Monarda punctate Council Packet Page Number 253 of 297 Attachment 12 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 6:00 P.M. Tuesday, July 16, 2024 City Hall, Council Chambers 1830 County Road B East E.NEW BUSINESS 2.Design Review Resolution, Hampton Companies, 2694 Maplewood Drive North Elizabeth Hammond, Planner, gave the presentation. Todd Francis, Hampton Companies, addressed the board and answered questions. Boardmember Lamers moved to approve a resolution for design review of an office and warehouse building to be constructed at 2694 Maplewood Drive North, subject to conditions of approval and with the friendly amendment to Section 3, Item 12 toincludethat “the site’s trash receptacles are not required to be within an enclosure if they are located behind the building and within the fenced-in parking area, accessible by a self-closing locked gate at all times. The gate must be shut when not in use, and the dumpsters cannot be visible from the public right-of-way. If they are located elsewhere on the site, the trash receptacles must be screened and located within an enclosure per code requirements.” DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01Hampton Companies LLC has requested approval of design review to construct an office and warehouse building on the property located at 2694 Maplewood Drive North. 1.02Theproperty located at 2694 Maplewood Drive Northis legally described as: That part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 477, which lies Southerly of a line parallel with the South line of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, and 120.55 feet South of the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Kohlmans Lakeview Addition. AND That part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 477, lying Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, thence Southerly along the Westerly line of Lot 6, 120.55 feet to the point of beginning of the line to:be described; thence Westerly parallel to the South line of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, to the Westerly line of Tract C and said line terminating. Tax Parcel Identification: 042922440044 Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review boardmake the following findings to approve plans: 1.That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not July 16, 2024 1 Community Design Review BoardMeetingMinutes Council Packet Page Number 254 of 297 , Attachment 12 impair the desirability of investment oroccupation in the neighborhood;that it willnot unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring,existing or proposed developments;and that it will not create traffic hazards orcongestion. 2.That the design and location of the proposeddevelopment are in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and are not detrimental to theharmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article andthe city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3.That the design and location of the proposed development would provide adesirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it isaesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. City Council Action. 3.01The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the design plans. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1.Obtain a conditional use permit from the city council for this project. 2.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 3.All requirements of the fire marshal, city engineer, and building official must be met. 4.The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) must review the proposed project. The applicant is responsible for meeting any MnDOT review requirements. 5.Satisfy the requirements in the engineering review authored by Jon Jarosch, dated July 9, 2024. 6.Satisfy the requirements set forth in the environmental review authored by Shann Finwall, dated July 5, 2024 7.The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 8.Rooftop vents and any mechanical equipment shall be hidden fromview from all sides of the property and screened as required by city ordinance. 9.This resolution approvesthe 16-foot-wide drive aisle along the site’s north end, as approved by the city’s Fire Marshal.The drive aisle is approved as long as the door, as shown on the plan, remains on the building's north side for fire access and that the building has a fire sprinkler system installed. 10.This resolution approves the site’s east side employee parking stalls in the fenced-in parking lot to be 9 feet wide. This parking area must be signed for employee parking only. 11.This approval does not include signage. Any signs for the project must meet the city’s ordinance requirements, and the applicant must applyfor a sign permit before installation. July 16, 2024 2 Community Design Review BoardMeetingMinutes Council Packet Page Number 255 of 297 , Attachment 12 12.Before the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a.The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letterof credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150percent of the cost of the work. b.Elevation perspectives of the proposed trash enclosure mustbe submitted to staff for review. The elevations must include all sides of the enclosure and detail the height,materials, and colors. The enclosure must meet ordinance requirements. c.Before a building permit is issued, the applicant must submit additional elevation details on the proposed fence showing the height, materials, colors, and opaqueness. Staff must also approve the final design and materials. d.The applicant must incorporate the requirements outlined in the environmental review and submit an updated tree and landscape plan. 13.The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a.Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b.Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. c.Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d.Install all required outdoor lighting. e.Install all required sidewalks and trails. 14.If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a.The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b.The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building isin the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 15.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community developmentmay approve minor changes. Seconded by BoardmemberReinertAyes – All The motion passed. July 16, 2024 3 Community Design Review BoardMeetingMinutes Council Packet Page Number 256 of 297 , Attachment 13 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 7:00 P.M. Tuesday, July 16, 2024 City Hall, Council Chambers 1830 County Road B East E.PUBLIC HEARING 2.Conditional Use Permit Resolution, Hampton Companies, 2694 Maplewood Drive North Elizabeth Hammond, Planner,gave the presentation and answered questions from the commission. Vice Chairperson Yang opened the public hearing. Todd Francis, Hampton Companies, addressed the commission and answered questions. Vice Chairperson Yang closed the public hearing. CommissionerOszman moved toapprove a resolution for a conditional use permit approving an office and warehouse building to be constructed at 2694 Maplewood Drive North, subject to conditions of approval. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01Hampton Companies LLC has requested a Conditional Use Permit for the property located at 2694 Maplewood Drive North. 1.02Theproperty located at 2694 Maplewood Drive Northis legally described as: That part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 477, which lies Southerly of a line parallel with the South line of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, and 120.55 feet South of the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Kohlmans Lakeview Addition. AND That part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 477, lying Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, thence Southerly along the Westerly line of Lot 6, 120.55 feet to the point of beginning of the line to:be described; thence Westerly parallel to the South line of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, to the Westerly line of Tract C and said line terminating. Tax Parcel Identification: 042922440044 1.03City Ordinance Division 14. Section 44-272 requires a conditional use permit for any building or use in the M1 zoning district within 350 feet of residentially zoned property. Section 2. Standards. July 16, 2024 1 PlanningCommission Meeting Minutes Council Packet Page Number 257 of 297 , Attachment 13 2.01 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. CityOrdinance Section 44-1097(a)states that the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine standards for approval. 1.The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2.The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3.The use would not depreciate property values. 4.The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5.The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. 6.The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7.The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8.The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and scenic features into the development design. 9.The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Section 3. Findings. 3.01The proposal meets the specific Conditional Use Permit standards. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01The City conducted the following review when considering this conditional use permit request. 1.On July 16, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. City staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approvethis resolution. 2.On August 12, 2024, the City Council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and City staff. Section 5.City Council 5.01The City Council hereby _______ the resolution.Approval is based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: July 16, 2024 2 PlanningCommission Meeting Minutes Council Packet Page Number 258 of 297 Attachment 13 1.All construction shall follow the approved plans stamped July 1, 2024. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2.The proposed construction must be started within one year of council approval, or the permit shall become null and void. 3.The city council will review the permit in one year. 4.The property will meet the requirements of the council-approved design review resolution dated August 12, 2024. 5.All signs shall meet the City of Maplewood sign ordinance. The property owner will obtain sign permits as required. 6.Screening along the property’s east property line adjacent to the residentially zoned property must be maintained as required by city ordinance. 7.The site's trash receptacles are not required to be within an enclosure if they are located behind the building and within the fenced-in parking area, accessible by a self- closing locked gate at all times. The gate must be shut when not in use, and the dumpsters cannot be visible from the public right-of-way. If they are located elsewhere onthe site, the trash receptacles must be screened and located within an enclosure per code requirements. Seconded by CommissionerArbuckleAyes – All The motion passed. This item will go to the city council on August 12, 2024. July 16, 2024 3 PlanningCommission Meeting Minutes Council Packet Page Number 259 of 297 , Attachment 14 e , v i s r e i D n d a o p o m w o e l C p n a o t M p 4 m 0.48 Acre SiteVacant Manufacturing PropertyConditional Use PermitDesign Review 9 ¤¤¤¤ a 6 Hampton Companies proposesconstructing a 4,500-square-footoffice and warehouse buildingon the propertyRequesting approval for: H2 ¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 260 of 297 , Attachment 14 e , v i s r e i D n d a o p o m w o e l C p n a o t M p 4 The proposal meets this intent m 9 ¤ a 6 Site is guided in the Comp Planfor CommercialThe future land use guidancesupports a wide variety ofcommercial activities andindustrial uses, includingwarehouse and office land uses H2¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 261 of 297 Attachment 14 e , v i s r e i D n d a o p o m w o e l C p n a o t M p 4 The proposal is permittedThe property is adjacent to asingle-dwelling residential homeand neighborhood to the east m 9 ¤¤ a 6 The site is zoned M1-LightManufacturingThe M1 zoning district requires aconditional use permit for anybuilding or use within 350 feet ofresidentially zoned property H2 ¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 262 of 297 Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n a p m o C n o t p m a The applicant operates a real estate and construction company in White Bear Lake Ïthe building in Maplewood would be an expansion for the companyThe 4,500-square-foot building would be used by their roofing and siding division Ï1,740 square feet for office space/2,760 square feet for storage Site access provided off Maplewood DriveBuilding setbacks required: 30 feet from a street ROW and 50 feet from a residentiallot line Ïthe building is setback 60 feet from the ROW to the west and 90 feet from the residential lot line to the east Parking setbacks required: 15 feet from the street ROW, 5 feet from all other propertylines, and 20 feet from a residential lot lineTwo parking areas are shown, one in front of the building on the west side and onebehind the building on the east side of the parcel ÏBoth parking areas are 20 feet from the east and west property lines H ¤¤¤¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 263 of 297 , Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n a p m o C n o t p m a H Council Packet Page Number 264 of 297 Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n a p m o C n o t p m a The parking area in the rear will be enclosed with a gate at the rear northeast cornerof the building Ïthe applicant indicated employees would primarily use the site, andwhile customers may visit the front offices, this would be much less frequentParking stall size required: 9.5 feet wide by 18 feet long, drive aisle 24 feet wide ÏThefive stalls in the front parking area are 9.5 feet wide, and the eight stalls in the rearparking area are shown at 9 feet wideThe cityÔs parking code allows for stall width and length reduction for employeeparking, provided the stalls are marked for employees -the parking area is behind thebuilding and will be closed off from general access with a gateParking required: one stall/200 sq. ft. of office space, one stall/1,250 sq. ft. ofwarehouse space Ï11 stalls required overall, 13 stalls provided on site H ¤¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 265 of 297 , Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n a p m o C n o t p m a Drive aisles:24 feet wideexcept thedrive acrossthe siteÔsnorth endnarrows to16 feet wide The City Fire Marshal reviewed and approved the drive as shown, providingthe building has a fire sprinkler system installed and the north side of thebuilding near the rear gate has access through a door ÏBoth these items willbe achievedGiven the size of the building and site, there would not be a need to accessthe back half of the site with a fire truck H¤ ¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 266 of 297 Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n a p m o C n o t p m a H 4,500 square feet, one-story building: divided into two areas Ïthe front portion, 1,740 square feet, would be used as office space for employees, andthe back portion, 2,760 square feet, would be used as a warehouse ¤ Council Packet Page Number 267 of 297 , Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n a p m o C n o t p m Above the office area, a The building's overallheight is 19.8 feet1,740-square-footpotential storage area isshownThis would requirefurther review by theCity if the applicantpursues this Ïmustmeet applicable codes a ¤¤¤ H Council Packet Page Number 268 of 297 , Attachment 14 The primary exterior buildingmaterials combine LP smartsiding and LP shakes with a stonebase and architectural shingles ¤ The primary colors willbe shades of gray andblack ¤ Council Packet Page Number 269 of 297 , Attachment 14 An extensive retainingwall system surroundsthe back half of the siteÏthe applicantproposes a vinyl chain-link fence above theretaining wallThe applicant mustsubmit additionalelevation details on thevinyl chain-link fenceshowing the height,materials, colors, andopaqueness before abuilding permit isissued Ïsubject to staffapproval ¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 270 of 297 , Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n a p m o C n o t p m a Applicant proposestree removal andplanting of variousshrubs and trees onthe site Ïthelandscape plan mustbe updated beforegrading, andbuilding permits willbe issued H¤ The applicant must incorporate the requirements outlined in the environmentalreview Ïpreserving some of the trees shown to be removed, plantingadditional trees, and exchanging some of the proposed plantings for native orpollinator-friendly plantings ¤ Council Packet Page Number 271 of 297 , Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n a p m o C n o t p m This will be entirely screened by the retaining wall and solid fenceCDRB waived the requirements for a trash enclosure if dumpsters are in this location andhidden from view (adjacent properties and streets)If the applicant moves the dumpsters outside of the fenced and gated area, an enclosure isrequired Ïthis is noted in the CUP and design review resolutions ¤¤¤ a The applicant identified a location for the trash enclosure within the fenced-inback portion of the propertyThe applicant submitted a photometric site plan as part of its application Ïtheplan meets the code requirements for permitted light spread and foot-candlelevels H ¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 272 of 297 Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n a p m o C n o t p One phone message received: The caller identified as a resident ofthe neighborhood and stated they are in favor of the proposal asshown, meets zoning, would be an improvement and would like tosee something done with the property (overgrown trees andshrubs/rotting retaining wall) m ¤ a Staff surveyed surrounding properties and sent a publicmeeting notice to properties within 500 feetStaff Review comments received from Engineering, Building,and Environmental staff: Applicant must meet requirementsoutlined in the staff report and update plans accordinglybefore permitting and construction H¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 273 of 297 , Attachment 14 e v i r D f f d a ot S o / w e l w p e i a v e M R 4 l i 9 c 6 n 2 u , o s e C i n d n a n o p i a t m a n o d o i C n s se i n m o m t m p m o o (recommended approval) m c a C e CDRB & Planning Commission: July 16, 2024¤City Council, August 12, 2024Staff recommends approval of the proposal H-R ¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 274 of 297 Attachment 14 e v i r D d o o w e l p a M 4 9 6 2 , s e i n : a n p o i t c m A o d C e d n n e o t m p m o m c Motion to approve a resolution for design review approving Motion to approve a resolution for a conditional use permit . e . a Raapproving the construction of an office and warehouse buildingat 2694 Maplewood Drive North, subject to conditions ofapproval.bthe construction of an office and warehouse building at 2694Maplewood Drive North, subject to conditions of approval. H Council Packet Page Number 275 of 297 J2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date August 12, 2024 REPORT TO:Michael Sable, City Manager REPORT FROM:Joe Rueb, Finance Director PRESENTER: Joe Rueb, Finance Director AGENDA ITEM: City Council Budget and CIP Discussion #1 Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The City is required to file a proposed property tax levy for fiscal year 2025 with Ramsey County by September 30, 2024. The City Council must adopt the final 2025 tax levy by December 30, 2024. The Council may decrease the proposed tax levy prior to final adoption, but may not increase the proposed levy after the September filing with the County. Recommended Action: No action is required. Staff requests direction on the policy decisions outlined in the presentation. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $31,909,056 Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Community Inclusiveness Financial & Asset Mgmt Environmental Stewardship Integrated CommunicationOperational EffectivenessTargeted Redevelopment The budget intersects with all areas of the strategic plan and sets spending policy for the next year. Background: Specific goals and challenges for the 2025 budget include an overall levy increase of 12.79% due to an increase in payroll costs; commodity prices; service costs; and fleet charges. Attachments: 1. PowerPoint Council Packet Page Number 276 of 297 J2, Attachment Discussion #1 August 12, 2024 2025 Budget and CIP Overview Council Packet Page Number 277 of 297 J2, Attachment s e v i t c e j b O s e g s p s n o e e l c l h o a t r s h e p c k g r d d d n n o u a a b e s W y l n r ai l a o P e n I i g m , i m C s t i l e i P es P I I d r g e i C C p e n c t f i f l d a o a o r o n t a t sp w w et tt e e i i e ee v v g r g gg r e d dd e d v v u uu u B OBB O . ... . B 12345 Council Packet Page Number 278 of 297 J2, Attachment t n s e n p t s i s o e s s n h i m i t e e s e e t a n n d i g cm r e e i r a a p v v n i i n t o o w s u l a i c e u e l t r e m M v f c S f t e P ml n E I e d a o l s t e y c s a C t n i R i n A e d n o g d i e u m & et t e t l n a a m t e r r a o i r e g g m a i c r p e v o r n a t n t aT C O n I E n S i F Council Packet Page Number 279 of 297 J2, Attachment y v e L x a T y t r e p o r P y r a n i m i l e r P Council Packet Page Number 280 of 297 J2, Attachment y v e L x a T y t r d e e u p n i t o n r o P C y r a n i m i l Crime Analyst (0.44% levy or $123,900)CSO (0.28% levy or $78,000) e Three additional Firefighter-Paramedic (1.85% levy or $524,676.51)Ambulance (1.2% levy or $340,000)Revenue Restructure r P Compensation Plan ImplementationFire Department and Ambulance FundPolice DepartmentInflation and Contractual Services ¤¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 281 of 297 J2, Attachment J2, Attachment y r o t s i H y v e L x a Average Increase Past Ten Years is 5.4% T 8.0%6.0%4.0%2.0%0.0% 14.0%12.0%10.0% Council Packet Page Number 282 of 297 J2, Attachment J2, Attachment ? e g n a h C y v e L e h t d i D w o H Council Packet Page Number 283 of 297 J2, Attachment s e s a e r c n % I 0 . l 6 n l 2 o i r t o o a r t 5 y n 4 e 2 a , 0 m P 0 % e l 5 7 . % $ p 9 d 3 s . 4 t m 4 n I r n 2 o e n u r 2 m 0 a o l t F 4 4 r 3 P 8 a , l 3 5 , p 5 n 2 , 4 a e 5 o 8 2 9 r i D t 6 $ 9 r , e 4 a e 1 s = $ h $ n n t e = l e c l O e i l e a p l r l r o i G PFA e m v ¤¤¤ o CO ¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 284 of 297 J2, Attachment s e g n e l l a h C e r u d t c n l u l r a t a r s e e s l v R a O e u e o s n a e G e v r e t c R n e I d s y g n e v s u d e a F L e u r e x c c a B n n T I a l l l 5 % u o 9 2 r b 7 y . 0 m a 2 1PA 2 ¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 285 of 297 J2, Attachment s e . t g e g n d . e u s l b e l c i 5 a v 2 . r 0e e h c 2 S d n . e r C a l l h n o a t f u t i s b s du e p ce d s a m F n n g c a e r n a l r a a e e a e e o h n i b h C t c t s o N l o o r a l t n m r o r a f a o 6 o a r e t f 2 f 0 l i o 2 0 0 p , e p u .0 0 9 u , G s 0 7 a O n 0 , d b 7 e ,40 t n C 1 v 35 u $ e e $$ f m r r rr A g on o o i A G y yy d L n v vv o s e i ee l u ll t e c d % B % u% u 9 l 08 d c 21 2 e .. . 5 n 6RI10 2 ¤¤¤¤¤ 0 2 Council Packet Page Number 286 of 297 J2, Attachment n a l P t n y e r o g m e t e a v C o y r b s p t c e m j I o r l P a P t I i C p f o a y r C a m 9 m 2 u 0 S 2 Ï 5 2 0 2 Council Packet Page Number 287 of 297 J2, Attachment s n a l P P I C 5 2 0 2 Council Packet Page Number 288 of 297 J2, Attachment s n a l d P e u P n i I t n C o C 5 2 0 2 Council Packet Page Number 289 of 297 J2, Attachment s n w o n k n l U e a u s w n e e i e t n v i t r e e n a R R a p t r e s i n c G A e n D R D aR l r E E a / u A F c s F s C AI i n FSITB ¤¤¤¤¤Note: $282,900 = approximately 1.0% levy increase/decrease Council Packet Page Number 290 of 297 J2, Attachment n o i t p y 12 g v o ## n es i d g r L e nn i A n a P i oo x c I ii r i e y t e l a ss C a v e T H ss o e n e 9 g uu P i 5 n L H 2 l cc dl 2 o ss x 0 ia u ii P 0 i e t I a 2 B c 2 DD a T - C ln x 5 5 m PPy aa a II9 i 22 r T nn 2 00 CC a i i - T // 0 F22F n n tt i i 2 tttt e e - - P m pppp gg h i 5 I l t oooo dd 2 e u dddd C uur 0 r BBPAA2AA T / t e 4 g 4 2 2 0 d 4 4 0 2 2 2 2 u , 0 , 0 9 2 B 9 2 ,r , r e 6 2 e 12 b b tt m ss m e uu e t c gg p e uu e AASD ¤¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 291 of 297 J2, Attachment , s e . y v i v t e c l e j x ; s b a t ; ; t t o s e s , n t g s n e r e e ; n a t a l c g t ; m o e i p t ds o s yr g i u n c v r a i d c b o e i p g e u l P t e e e d b a t x t d l t a a a d y l at r c e n t e t i u , i l c s e s c p l no , g e m a a a r p w c c d n , u e m i i s r s s f u o v a op , d c f e e o a B w r e s r e h e i m i e s s h r v v k e a i e t r e t c b r g n o a n l a e r s a w t a n s l m c m i a i i m t r t r c n r i o y M a on fl f pm u a y r P t e dn Iio e DCApACC ¤¤¤¤¤¤ Council Packet Page Number 292 of 297 J2, Attachment t n e m p o l e v e D t e g d u B Dozens of Staff EmployeesHundreds of HoursThousands of Lines of CodeMillions of Dollars ΘΘΘΘ $$ $$$ $$$$ $$$$$$$ Council Packet Page Number 293 of 297 J2, Attachment e r u t c u r t S d n u F Council Packet Page Number 294 of 297 J2, Attachment ? n a l p e r e u w t o u d F w o H Long-Term Financial Management Planning Council Packet Page Number 295 of 297 J2, Attachment s n o i s t t c y a e vj r e o r L e P x d s a P i I n T s C o t i e s n 5 i g 2 c r o 0 e a T2 D C r y l mm e i c rr i ii l h ff c t ff o n AAPO ¤¤¤¤ u o C Council Packet Page Number 296 of 297 J2, Attachment ? s n o i t s e u Q Council Packet Page Number 297 of 297