Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022-09-20 CDRB Meeting Packet
Meeting is also available on Comcast Ch. 16 and streaming vod.maplewoodmn.gov AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 6:00 P.M. Tuesday, September 20, 2022 City Hall, Council Chambers 1830 County Road B East A.CALL TO ORDER B.ROLL CALL C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA D.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.July 19, 2022, Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes E.NEW BUSINESS 1.Design Review, Multifamily Residential Project, 1136/1160 Frost Avenue East F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1.Design Review, Multifamily Residential Project, 2615 Maplewood Drive G.BOARD PRESENTATIONS H.STAFF PRESENTATIONS None. I.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS – 3 minute time limit per person J.ADJOURNMENT THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK D1 July 19, 2022 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 1 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 6:00 P.M. Tuesday, July 19, 2022 City Hall, Council Chambers 1830 County Road B East A.CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Board was held and called to order at 6:02 p.m. by Chairperson Kempe B.ROLL CALL Bill Kempe, Chairperson Present Jason Lamars, Boardmember Present Amanda Reinert, Boardmember Present Ananth Shankar, Boardmember Present Tom Oszman, Boardmember Present Staff Present: Michael Martin, Assistant Community Development Director Elizabeth Hammond, Planner C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA Boardmember Lamars moved to approve the agenda as presented. Seconded by Boardmember Shankar Ayes – All The motion passed. D.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Approval of June 21, 2022 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes Boardmember Shankar moved to approve the June 21, 2022 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes as submitted. Seconded by Boardmember Oszman Ayes – All The motion passed. E.NEW BUSINESS 1.Comprehensive Sign Plan, Independent School District 622, 2680 Upper Afton Road Elizabeth Hammond, Planner, presented the Comprehensive Sign Plan, Independent School District 622, 2680 Upper Afton Road and answered questions from the Board. Chris Bubser, LHB, addressed the Board and answered questions. Boardmember Kempe moved to approve the comprehensive sign plan for Independent School District 622, at 2680 Upper Afton Road, subject to certain conditions of approval: 1.The applicant shall submit sign permit applications for the monument and the wall signs to be reviewed by the city before installation. CDRB Packet Page Number 1 of 86 D1 July 19, 2022 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 2 2. This approval allows a monument sign with a dynamic display to be located adjacent to Upper Afton Road, 10 feet from the north property line. The sign can be up to eight feet in height and 50 square feet in size. The dynamic display portion cannot exceed 50% of the overall sign area. 3. This approval allows for one wall sign up to 24 square feet in size to be located on the north side of the building facing Upper Afton Road. 4. The dynamic display monument sign must meet the requirements outlined in ordinance section 443-743 (k) for dynamic displays in conjunction with institutional uses. 5. Any changes to the approved plans require review by the community design review board. Staff may approve minor changes. Seconded by Boardmember Lamars Ayes – All The motion passed. F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None G. BOARD PRESENTATIONS None H. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 1. Concept Plan Review, 3090 Southlawn Drive (No Report) Michael Martin, Assistant Community Development Director, presented the Concept Plan Review, 3090 Southlawn Drive, and answered questions from the Board. Patrick Brama, Enclave Companies, addressed the Board and answered questions. This item is for informational purposes only; no action is required. I. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None J. ADJOURNMENT Boardmember Lamars moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:35 p.m. Seconded by Boardmember Shankar Ayes – All The motion passed. CDRB Packet Page Number 2 of 86 COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Meeting Date September 20, 2022 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Design Review, Multifamily Residential Project, 1136/1160 Frost Avenue East Action Requested: Motion ☐Discussion ☐ Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution ☐ Ordinance ☐Contract/Agreement ☐ Proclamation Policy Issue: Reuter Walton Development is proposing a new five-story, 150-unit market-rate development over below-grade parking on the properties located at 1136/1160 Frost Avenue East. To move forward with this project, the applicant is requesting city council approval for a comprehensive plan amendment, conditional use permit, lot combination, public vacation, and design review. Recommended Act i on : a.Motion to approve a resolution for design review. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No ☐ Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): ☐ Adopted Budget ☐ Budget Modification ☐ New Revenue Source ☐Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: ☐Community Inclusiveness ☐Financial & Asset Mgmt ☐Environmental Stewardship ☐Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness ☐Targeted Redevelopment The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on September 8, 2022. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is November 7, 2022 . As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. Background: On June 28, 2021, the City Council approved a purchase agreement with Reuter Walton Development to sell the city-owned property at 1160 Frost Avenue East. Reuter Walton Development also has a purchase agreement for 1136 Frost Avenue – the former Maplewood Marine site. The developer proposes a new five-story, 150-unit market-rate development over below-grade parking on the properties located at 1136/1160 Frost Avenue East. The proposed apartment building will include a mix of studio, one bedroom, one bedroom plus den, two bedroom, E1 CDRB Packet Page Number 3 of 86 and three bedroom apartments. All units will have either a concrete patio or a recessed deck. One level of below-grade parking and surface parking will be provided – amenities will include a clubroom, fitness room, roof deck, outdoor pool, pickleball court, and dog run. Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan The Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan outlines nine guiding principles to redevelopment in the area as follows: 1. Design the future of Gladstone as a village. 2. Transform regional trails into celebrated village corridors. 3. Make Gladstone a compelling quality of life choice. 4. Weave natural systems and ecological function into the built and recreational environment. 5. Allow Gladstone’s future to whisper the story of its past. 6. Make walkability the standard. 7. Think of Gladstone as a neighborhood for all stages of life. 8. Make the Gladstone redevelopment plan a model for others to follow. 9. Make multi-modal links between Gladstone and areas beyond. Comprehensive Plan Amendment The 2040 Comprehensive Plan currently guides the project area as Medium Density Residential. Medium Density Residential has a density range of 6 to 10 units per net acre. The applicant is requesting the city amend the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to guide the project area to High Density Residential, which has a density range of 10.1 to 25 units per acre. In addition, the city provides density bonuses to developers for providing underground parking. For each underground parking space, the city code allows 300 square feet to be added to the net acreage used for density determination. This project proposes 161 underground spaces adding 48,300 square feet to the project site. The applicant’s proposal to build 150 units of housing would meet the requirements of the High Density Residential designation in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Conditional Use Permit Five-Story Building The R3 – multi-family zoning district requires a conditional use permit for any residential buildings more than three stories or 35 feet in height. The applicant’s proposed building will typically be 56 feet and 8 inches tall and bump up to 58 feet and 4 inches at the corner cornices. In comparison, the multi-family buildings east of this project site approved as part of the Frost-English Village redevelopment project are 51 feet tall. Design Review Site Plan The project site would be accessed from a single drive coming off Frost Avenue on the east side of the site. The building is centered on the site, and the developer worked to create substantial setbacks from the residential properties to the west and the Gladstone Savannah to the east. At its closest point, the building would be 102.9 feet setback from the residential properties to the west, E1 CDRB Packet Page Number 4 of 86 45.6 feet from Frost Avenue, 115.4 feet from the vacant residential property to the south, and 131.5 feet from the Gladstone Savannah to the east. The parking lot is largely encircled by the building but is setback 40.1 feet from the property line to the east, with the access drive lane coming within 36.5 feet of the east property line. All building and parking lot setbacks are being met. In the southeast corner of the proposed site, the developer is proposing a patio with a fire pit, a pickleball court, and a swimming pool. In the northwest corner, a dog park is proposed and is proposed to be setback 33.2 feet from the residential property to the south. A gazebo is proposed to be located in the southwest corner of the site, setback 29 feet from the west property line. Staff believes there is an opportunity to move the dog park, so it is setback at least 50 feet from the south property line. The gazebo location should also be adjusted, so it is setback at least 50 feet from the west property line. Building and Green Area City code requires multiple family buildings to dedicate at least 35 percent of the site to green areas and limit the building area to 35 percent of the site. The proposed site plan includes 55.8 percent of green space, and the building area will comprise 18 percent of the site. Both the building and green area code requirements are being met. Building Elevations The proposed building will be constructed with contrasting light and dark fiber cement lap siding and wood-look lap siding accent boards. A brick façade will be used on lower levels, and cementitious trim boards will be used throughout the building. The city’s Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan recommends that multifamily buildings in Gladstone provide variation in the façade footprint, setting some areas back from the right-of -way (20 percent of the frontage length) and that the front façade of the top floor of high buildings be setback eight to 16 feet allowing for garden terraces overlooking the street. These are not code requirements. The building does provide façade variation with the use of materials and decks. The building is also setback 45.6 feet from Frost Avenue. While the top floor of the front façade is not setback, the rear façade is where a rooftop deck is being proposed. Floor Area City ordinance requires a minimum of 580 square feet for studio and one-bedroom units. Two- bedroom units are required to be at least 740 square feet in size. Three-bedroom units are required to be at least 860 square feet in size. The applicant’s submittal indicates that not all of the alcove units – studio – meet the minimum floor area. All other units meet the minimum requirements. Before any building permits are issued, the applicant must submit revised floor plans to ensure all units meet the minimum requirements. Indoor Storage A minimum of 120 cubic feet of storage space, in addition to normal closet space, shall be made available for each multiple-dwelling unit in an R-3 residence district. Such storage space shall be located in the same building as the dwelling unit or in the garage but shall not be considered as part E1 CDRB Packet Page Number 5 of 86 of the habitable area of a dwelling unit. If located in the garage, it shall be enclosed and shall not be part of the automobile parking area. Before any building permits are issued, the applicant must submit plans that show it is meeting the minimum indoor storage requirements. Parking Waiver The city code states that multi-family buildings must provide two parking spaces for each unit – with one of the parking spaces being covered. This project requires a total of 300 spaces. This proposed project will have 244 parking spaces, with 161 parking spaces in the underground parking garage and 83 parking spaces in the surface lot. The co vered parking requirement is being met, but the applicant is seeking of parking waiver of 56 spaces. The developer submitted the following narrative regarding its request: For this project, we anticipate parking demand to resemble this distribution and ratio: You can see that our smallest units are anticipated to demand 1 space per unit, and then as the units get larger that demand increases roughly proportionate to the unit size. We designed 250 total parking spaces: 161 inside in a covered garage and 83 surface spaces in front of the community. At our projected demand of 214 spaces we have an excess of 30 available for visitors and guests. This assumes the building is 100% occupied, and we know that naturally we’ll carry 3-5% vacancy at any given time, which provides an additional buffer. Our design contains all parking set back from the street and set back from adjacent residences. We also feel the position of this parking will help our new project integrate more seamlessly with the adjacent savannah. Our experience in other similar suburban communities support a parking ratio of 1.5 spaces / unit much like we have here. Our most comparable new construction project in Roseville has a parking ratio of 1.45; the building is full, but the parking is not. In addition to the parking, the applicant states it will provide 150 bike parking spaces – this is not a code requirement. Landscaping and Screening The tree inventory plan shows 12 significant trees on the site, equaling 163 caliper inches. Redevelopment of the site will result in the removal of all 12 significant trees. The landscape plan shows 154 new trees (ranging in size from 1.5 to 2.5 caliper inches) planted on the site, for a total of 163 caliper inches of replacement trees – meeting the city’s tree preservation code requirements. City code requires screening to be installed when light from automobile headlights and other sources would be directed into residential windows. Due to the configuration of the proposed site plan staff does not believe this will be an issue. E1 CDRB Packet Page Number 6 of 86 City code requires a landscaped, and possible screened area, of not less than 20 feet in width shall be provided where a multiple dwelling abuts a property zoned for single dwellings. This occurs on the west side of the site, and the applicant’s landscape plan shows the inclusion of many plantings both meeting the landscaped and screening requirements. Lighting The applicant submitted a photometric plan as part of its application. It appears the plan is meeting the code requirements but is not showing the light intensity measurement at all property lines. Before any permits are issued, the applicant will be required to submit a revised photometric plan showing all code requirements being met Public Vacation and Lot Combination The applicant is seeking city approval to combine the three parcels of property that comprise the project site into a single parcel. Staff has no issues with the proposed lot combination. In addition to the lot combination, the applicant is seeking the three public vacations of unused right-of -way. A summary of those requests follow: • Vacate the full unused Edward Street right-of way which currently divides the two parcels comprising the project site. • Vacate the north half of the unused Fenton Avenue right-of way that is adjacent to the existing city-owned parcel at 1160 Frost Avenue. • Vacate the west half of the unused Frank Street right-of way that is adjacent to the existing city-owned parcel at 1160 Frost Avenue. Because the property owners of the affected properties are party to this development project, there is no requirement to submit a petition and the council is permitted to approve this request with a simple majority vote. The lot combination request requires that the proposed new single lot shall include a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the portion of the Frank Street right-of - way proposed for vacation. Department Comments Engineering Please see Jon Jarosch’s engineering report, dated September 12 , 2022, attached to this report. Environmental Please see Shann Finwall’s environmental report, dated September 12, 2022, attached to this report. Building Official – Randy Johnson The proposed building is required to meet the minimum requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code E1 CDRB Packet Page Number 7 of 86 Board and Commission Review Community Design Review Board September 20, 2022: The community design review board (CDRB) will review this project. Planning Commission September 20, 2022: The planning commission will hold a public hearing and review this project. Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 53 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site and within the Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone plat for their opinion about this proposal. Staff received the following four comments. 1. We received notice of the Frost apartments proposed development. We live on Phalen Pl near Frost and this development would directly affect us. We are raising three children in this neighborhood because it is quiet and safe. We have enjoyed the peace and quiet, easy access to the lake and to the Gladstone Savanna and playground. This development, if approved, would change that. 150 units up to 3 bedrooms is a whole lot of people to add to this area. We would have to listen to dogs barking at the dog park that will be installed a few doors down, and there would be a massive increase of cars and foot traffic because the development doesn't have enough space for parking and because our street would be the closest way to get to the lake. The request to have less parking than code allows is alarming. What is the plan for parking if there isn't space there? The parking bays on Frost are already often full. We have spoken to a number of neighbors and it is clear that the neighborhood does not want or need this development, and this project would do nothing positive for us. We ask you to consider the people and families living in this area and how this negatively affects us. We are not supportive of this proposal. (Brynna Kuechenmeister, 1857 Phalen Place North) 2. I am disappointed to learn that Reuter Walton Development is proposing yet another development along Frost Ave. I moved to this area twelve years ago with my family in the hopes that this could be our forever home. Maplewood officials often spoke about community improvements in this area, and we had high hopes. While there have been some changes that have benefited the neighborhood, the purpose for others has been unclear. We are struggling to understand what the vision is for Maplewood, particularly the area along Frost Ave. With the exception of some smaller multi-family units, the neighborhoods along Frost Ave have traditionally been comprised of single-family homes. Many of those homes are moderate single-story homes, many built more than fifty years ago. There are some small businesses in the area, designed to meet needs of the residents in the immediate area. Frost Ave itself is only two lanes, with traffic controlled by round-a-bout rather than stop signs or traffic lights. This is not an area designed for mass-multi-tenant living. This new development proposal on the corner of Frost Ave and Phalen Pl is a blot on the landscape. This five-story grotesque monstrosity in the middle of a neighborhood of mostly single-story homes is an absurd proposal. Not only would a five-story building be a towering eye-sore to residents and passers-by, but the proposed design is so specific that it will be dated in less than two decades. E1 CDRB Packet Page Number 8 of 86 The proposal appears more like a downtown development than something for a suburb neighborhood with virtually no walkability. It is unclear to me who exactly the developer is hoping to attract. Market-rate for an apartment with these proposed amenities will exclude most people who currently live in the area, and people looking for this type of home are usually looking for a more metropolitan area. There may be a significant need for housing at this time, but what will become of this building when the market changes and that need no longer exists? When people have more choices, they won't pay those rates to live in this area. The City appears to have struggled recently in managing the landscape along Frost Ave. How will the City address the additional strain brought on by this development? How will Frost Ave be modified to handle the increase in traffic? What is the trade-off for allowing a private developer to take portions of City land/park? I can acknowledge a need for housing, but what need is affordable housing - not luxury apartments. A two or three story, traditionally designed apartment building with affordable rates would be much more beneficial to the residents of Maplewood. The City needs to consider it's vision for this area and for Maplewood as a whole. I have heard many demeaning comments about the city from acquaintances who live elsewhere. I'm sure you're familiar with "Maplehood". I have often defended this area as a gem. If this proposal is approved, I will move from this area - and likely out of Maplewood all together. As many of my neighbors have said, this will no longer be the area where I want to raise my family. Property values in the area will decline, and many of us will likely rent our properties out as we find our forever homes elsewhere. If the vision for the City is renter-centric, then perhaps this is the direction to take. If the City wants to attract homeowners who are vested in the area and pay taxes to ensure progress, then this proposal should be denied. As I sit here on this quiet evening with my windows open enjoying the peace that drew me to this home, I hope City managers can understand that this type of development would fundamentally change the nature of this area, and the type of residents it attracts. (Melissa Burgess, 1862 Phalen Place North) 3. I have lived here with my family for twelve years, and enjoy both the peace and convenience of the area. I have seen several development proposals on Frost Ave, and am concerned about what appears to be an effort to turn Frost Ave into "renters row". My family has enjoyed the City parks and trails in this area, and the peace that comes from a neighborhood of single-family homeowners. The introduction of yet another rental complex will further change the landscape of the area, which will also change who the neighborhood attracts. It is common sense that home owners are more invested in the area than renters, and they pay the majority of the property taxes. The City's entertainment of such a proposal seems contrary to what would benefit the City and it's residents. My wife and I can understand the need for housing at this time, but this is not the type of housing we should be supporting. This development is out of step with the style and environment of the neighborhood. The idea of a five-story building in that location is so off - putting that we can't believe anyone would support it - unless there are other motives that haven't been clearly stated. If the intent is really to meet the housing needs of the community, why build such an ultra-modern complex that the people who live here likely wouldn't be able to afford? And why build it in a location where residents would need to own a vehicle for transportation? Or is it also the City's plan to introduce busses to the area, further congesting the traffic situation caused by the Frost-English Village addition? And what happens when the housing market changes and rentals are no longer in demand? E1 CDRB Packet Page Number 9 of 86 How would the City ensure that any development would be maintained at the high levels being proposed? This type of housing does not belong in this neighborhood. If this proposal is approved, my family will move from Maplewood. We share the same thoughts of our neighbors - this will become a renter-heavy area with declining property values and the elimination of everything that makes us enjoy living here. If the City's goal is to alienate homeowners to attract renters, then this isn't the city for us. If the City desires to create more housing, then make it affordable housing and locate it in an area where residents can walk to the services they need so they aren't dependent on a vehicle or other transportation. That is what the residents need. (Michael Burgess, 1862 Phalen Place North) 4. I am the first house next to this development. I don't want a dog park 20 feet away from my house. I don't want to listen to 150 barking dogs all day and all night long. No thank you. Put the dog park on the East side of the building, there is no neighborhood to bother over there. Put the dog park on the South side of the building there is a big open field there and no neighborhood to bother. What are they going to do with my power and phone lines. These lines run out to Frost avenue along the building that is there. I believe the business is called Production Resources or formerly the Maplewood boat marine building. Where is the property line? Are they going to build a fence on the property line? It looks like to me in the plans that they are just going to plant trees. I would prefer they just plant trees. (Scott Cardinal, 1904 Phalen Place North) Reference Information Site Description Project Area: 5 acres Existing Land Use: Office building and vacant Surrounding Land Uses North: Frost Avenue and Flicek Park East: Gladstone Savanna South: Vacant Land and Gladstone Savanna West: Single Family Homes Planning Existing Land Use: Medium Density Residential (proposed to be High Density Residential) Existing Zoning: R3 – Multiple Dwelling Attachments: 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution 2. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 3. Design Review Resolution E1 CDRB Packet Page Number 10 of 86 4. Public Vacation and Lot Combination Resolution 5. Overview Map 6. 2040 Future Land Use Map 7. Zoning Map 8. Applicant’s Narrative 9. Site Plan, updated on August 29, 2022 10. Landscape Plan 11. Tree Preservation Plan 12. Photometric Plan 13. Lot Combination and Public Vacations Plan 14. Building Elevation 15. Engineering Report, dated September 12, 2022 16. Environmental Report, dated September 12, 2022 17. Applicant’s Plans (separate attachment) E1 CDRB Packet Page Number 11 of 86 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION Resolution approving the comprehensive plan amendment reguiding the properties at 1136 and 1160 Frost Avenue East from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential. Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ari Parritz, of Reuter Walton Development, has requested approval of a comprehensive plan amendment. 1.02 The properties are located at 1136 and 1160 Frost Avenue East and are legally described as: PIN: 162922420003 and 162922420004 – Lots 1 to 13, inclusive, Block 2, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, and that portion of the vacated alley which accrued to said lots by reason of the vacation thereof, according to the recorded plat on file in the office of the Register of Deeds within and for Ramsey County, Minnesota. AND PIN: 162922420112 – Lots 1 through 20, inclusive, in Block 1, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, together with the vacated alley in said Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Section 2. Criteria. 2.01 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan states the document may require amending due to a property owner request to change land use designation to allow a proposed development or redevelopment. 2.02 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan amendment process follows the same City identified public hearing process as the major update process used to develop the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Amendments are required to submit and gain approval from the Metropolitan Council. Section 3. Findings 3.01 The requested amendment would meet various amendment criteria outlined in the 2040 Comprehensive Guide Plan. 1.Enhance existing neighborhoods by encouraging residential neighborhood development and redevelopment to address gaps in the housing mix, ensuring the efficient use of city services and infrastructure, and strengthen neighborhood vitality. 2.Increase development densities/intensities with quality design at appropriate locations to support an increased mix of housing options, viability of neighborhood commercial nodes, and regional transit investments. E1, Attachment 1 CDRB Packet Page Number 12 of 86 3.Ensure the City has a variety of housing types for ownership and rental for people in all stages of their life cycle. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this amendment request. 1.On September 20, 2022, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the comprehensive plan amendment. 2.On October 10, 2022, the city council discussed the comprehensive plan amendment. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The above described comprehensive plan amendment is ________ based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to, and only effective upon, the following conditions: 1.Review and approval of the Metropolitan Council as provided by state statute. 2.The site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans: a.Design and site plans, date-stamped September 2, 2022. 3.The development must further comply with all conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. _______ for a conditional use permit _________ by the Maplewood City Council on October 10, 2022. _________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on October 10, 2022. E1, Attachment 1 CDRB Packet Page Number 13 of 86 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ari Parritz, of Reuter Walton Development, has requested approval of a conditional use permit to permit a five-story multifamily building. 1.02 The properties are located at 1136 and 1160 Frost Avenue East and are legally described as: PIN: 162922420003 and 162922420004 – Lots 1 to 13, inclusive, Block 2, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, and that portion of the vacated alley which accrued to said lots by reason of the vacation thereof, according to the recorded plat on file in the office of the Register of Deeds within and for Ramsey County, Minnesota. AND PIN: 162922420112 – Lots 1 through 20, inclusive, in Block 1, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, together with the vacated alley in said Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Section 2. Standards. 2.01 City Ordinance Section 44-359 requires a Conditional Use Permit for multiple dwelling buildings that exceed a height of 35 feet. 2.02 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. City Ordinance Section 44-1097(a) states that the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine standards for approval. 1.The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2.The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3.The use would not depreciate property values. 4.The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5.The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. E1, Attachment 2 CDRB Packet Page Number 14 of 86 6.The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7.The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8.The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and scenic features into the development design. 9.The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The proposal meets the specific conditional use permit standards. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this conditional use permit request. 1.On September 20, 2022, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council _______ this resolution. 2.October 10, 2022, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): 1.All construction shall follow the approved plans, date-stamped September 2, 2022. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2.The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. 3.The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4.A parking waiver of 56 parking spaces is approved. If a parking shortage develops, the city council may require additional parking spaces to be constructed. 5.Metropolitan Council approval of Resolution No. _______ for a comprehensive plan amendment _________ by the Maplewood City Council on October 10, 2022. E1, Attachment 2 CDRB Packet Page Number 15 of 86 __________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on October 10, 2022. E1, Attachment 2 CDRB Packet Page Number 16 of 86 DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ari Parritz, of Reuter Walton Development, has requested approval of a design review for a five-story multifamily building. 1.02 The properties are located at 1136 and 1160 Frost Avenue East and are legally described as: PIN: 162922420003 and 162922420004 – Lots 1 to 13, inclusive, Block 2, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, and that portion of the vacated alley which accrued to said lots by reason of the vacation thereof, according to the recorded plat on file in the office of the Register of Deeds within and for Ramsey County, Minnesota. AND PIN: 162922420112 – Lots 1 through 20, inclusive, in Block 1, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, together with the vacated alley in said Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1.That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2.That the design and location of the proposed development are in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and are not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3.That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. City Council Action. 3.01 The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the design plans date-stamped September 2, 2022. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: E1, Attachment 3 CDRB Packet Page Number 17 of 86 1.Obtain a conditional use permit from the city council for this project. 2.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 3.All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 4.Satisfy the requirements set forth in the engineering review authored by Jon Jarosch, dated September 12, 2022. 5.Satisfy the requirements set forth in the environmental review authored by Shann Finwall, dated September 12, 2022. 6.The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 7.Rooftop vents and equipment shall be located out of view from all sides of the property. 8.Any identification or monument signs for the project must meet the requirements of the city’s sign ordinance. Identification or monument signs shall be designed to be consistent with the project’s building materials and colors. 9.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a.The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. b.A revised site plan with the dog park setback at least 50 feet from the south property line and the gazebo setback at least 50 feet from the west property line. c.Revised floor plans showing all alcove – studio – units meeting the minimum floor area size of 580 square feet and that all units in the building have a minimum of 120 cubic feet of storage space. d.A revised photometric plan that meets city code requirements. 10.The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a.Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b.Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. c.Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d.Install all required outdoor lighting. E1, Attachment 3 CDRB Packet Page Number 18 of 86 e.Install all required sidewalks and trails. 11.If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a.The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b.The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 12.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. E1, Attachment 3 CDRB Packet Page Number 19 of 86 PUBLIC VACATION AND LOT COMBINATION RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ari Parritz, of Reuter Walton Development, has requested The Maplewood City Council to vacate the following unused public rights-of-way. a.The portion of Edward Street that lies to the north of Fenton Avenue and south of Frost Avenue. b.The north 30 feet of Fenton Avenue that lies to the east of Edward Street and to the west of Frank Street. c.The west 30 feet of Frank Street that lies to the north of Fenton Avenue and south of Frost Avenue. 1.02 A request was also made to combine the three lots located at 1136 and 1160 Frost. 1.03 The properties located at 1136 and 1160 Frost Avenue East are legally described as: PIN: 162922420003 and 162922420004 – Lots 1 to 13, inclusive, Block 2, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, and that portion of the vacated alley which accrued to said lots by reason of the vacation thereof, according to the recorded plat on file in the office of the Register of Deeds within and for Ramsey County, Minnesota. AND PIN: 162922420112 – Lots 1 through 20, inclusive, in Block 1, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, together with the vacated alley in said Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota. 1.04 The proposed single lot is proposed to be legally described as: Lots 1 to 10, inclusive, Block 2, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, and that portion of the vacated alley and vacated Edward Street. Lots 11 to 13, inclusive, Block 2, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, and that portion of the vacated alley. Lots 1 through 20, inclusive, in Block 1, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, together with the vacated alley, and that part of vacated Frank Street North and Fenton Avenue which lies east of the most westerly extent and south of the most northerly extend of said Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Section 2. Standard s 2.01 Minnesota state statute requires that no vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so. E1, Attachment 4 CDRB Packet Page Number 20 of 86 2.02 City Ordinance Section 34 -14 states that the lot division process may be used to create three or fewer lots. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The Maplewood City Council makes the following findings: 1.There is no anticipated public need for the described Edward Street, Fenton Avenue and Frank Street rights-of -way. 2.The vacation is not counter to the public interest. 3.The proposed lot combination meets all of the city’s subdivision requirements. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering public vacations requests. 1.A hearing notice on said request was published in the City of Maplewood’s official newspaper and written notice was mailed to the property owners within the Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey County Plat. 2.On October 10, 2022, the City Council held a hearing on such request, at which time all persons for and against the granting of said request were heard. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.A survey shall be submitted to staff with a legal description for a new single parcel reflecting the three properties being combined. 2.Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new multifamily housing building, proof that Ramsey County has recorded the lot division must be submitted to city staff. 3.The applicant shall provide a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the portion of the Frank Street right-of -way proposed for vacation. E1, Attachment 4 CDRB Packet Page Number 21 of 86 1136/1160 Frost Avenue East - Overview Map City of Maplewood August 24, 2022 Legend !I 0 475 FeetSource: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Subject Property E1, Attachment 5 CDRB Packet Page Number 22 of 86 1136/1160 Frost Avenue East - Future Land Use Map City of Maplewood August 24, 2022 Legend !IFuture Land Use - 2040 Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Use - Neighborhood High Density Open Space Park Subject Property 0 475 FeetSource: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County E1, Attachment 6 CDRB Packet Page Number 23 of 86 1136/1160 Frost Avenue East - Zoning Map City of Maplewood August 24, 2022 Legend !IZoning Single Dwelling (r1) Double Dwelling (r2) Multiple Dwelling (r3) Farm (f) Open Space/Park Mixed Use (mu) Subject Property 0 475 FeetSource: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County E1, Attachment 7 CDRB Packet Page Number 24 of 86 Written Statement of Intended Use On behalf of Reuter Walton Development, DJR is proposing a new development at 1136 / 1160 Frost Avenue East in the City of Maplewood. The intend use of the property is a new five story, 150 unit market rate apartment building. The proposed building will include a mix of studio, one bedroom, one bedroom plus den, two bedroom and three bedroom apartments. Most units will have either a concrete patio or recessed balcony. One level of below grade parking along with surface parking will be provided. Amenities will include a clubroom, fitness room, roof deck, outdoor pool, pickleball court and dog run. The goal of this project is to contribute to the need for approachably priced rental units in the City of Maplewood. The new structure will also enhance the streetscape along Frost Avenue by infilling what appears to be a missing tooth. This will be achieved by transforming this underutilized former industrial site into a dynamic new housing project that overlooks and embraces the Gladstone Savanah. This new project will also contribute to the economic growth of Maplewood through job creation and construction activity. E1, Attachment 8 CDRB Packet Page Number 25 of 86 FROST AVE. E.PHALEN PLACEFENTON AVENUE//EMTRTRTRTTHHHTSSSSC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EGENXFMRCOXXXXXGAZEBO - SEEARCHITECTURAL PLANSDOG PARK - SEEARCHITECTURAL PLANSPICKLEBALL COURT - SEEARCHITECTURAL PLANSSWIMMING POOL - SEEARCHITECTURAL PLANSPATIO AND FIRE PIT - SEEARCHITECTURAL PLANSEDGE OF UNDERGROUNDPARKING - SEEARCHITECTURAL PLANSENTRANCE SIGNAGE(TYP.) - SEEARCHITECTURAL PLANSCCAD1TYP.1TYP.1TYP.1TYP.2TYP.2TYP.3TYP.4TYP.4TYP.4TYP.4TYP.4TYP.5556881414149TYP.4TYP.4TYP.4TYP.889TYP.9TYP.9TYP.9TYP.9TYP.9TYP.9TYP.9TYP.182626TYP.26TYP.1920201921 TYP.21 TYP.21 TYP.21 TYP.REINSTALL EXISTINGSIGNAGE AND POSTREINSTALL EXISTINGSIGNAGE AND POSTREINSTALL EXISTINGCROSSWALK POSTS SIGNAGE,LIGHTS, AND RELATEDFEATURES.RETURN EXTRA TO CITY.141414COPYRIGHT © 2022 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDSOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO:REVISION HISTORYDATE DESCRIPTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.DATE:REG. NO.CERTIFICATIONXX/XX/2019 XXXX#XXDESIGNED:REVIEWED:PHASE:SUMMARYDRAWN:INITIAL ISSUE:BENCHMARKS (BM)PRELIMCADD USER: Jay FILE: C:\USERS\JAY\DROPBOX\PROJECTS\220801 - RW FROST APT MAPLEWOOD - DJR\WORKING FILES\CAD\DWG\PLAN SHEETS\C300 - SITE.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PLOT DATE: 8/25/2022 10:45 AMSBINKnow what'sRJAY RONALD KOESTER, P.E.08/XX/20224443322080108/19/2022JRKC300PAVING, SIGNAGE, ANDDIMENSIONAL PLANJRKJRKPROPERTY LINELIMITS OF DISTURBANCEBUILDINGCURB & GUTTERSOIL BORINGSFENCESIGNLIGHT POLEPARKING STALL COUNTADA PAVEMENT MARKINGSTANDARD DUTY BITUMINOUSHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUSCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE PAVINGLoDPROPOSEDLEGENDEXISTINGZONING: R-3B, RESIDENCE (MULTIPLE DWELLING)LOT AREA (OVERALL) 213,259 SF = 4.90 ACEXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:0.90 AC (TO BE REMOVED)PROPOSED NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA:2.17 ACNET IMPERVIOUS CREATED: 2.17 AC MAXIMUM HARDCOVER 65% MAX.TOTAL HARDCOVER AREA:(IMPERVIOUS AREA/4.90 AC) 44.2%BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA: 39,044 SFBUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM ALLOWED: 35 FEET (3 STORIES)5 STORIES (BY VARIANCE)BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED: SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANSDISTURBED AREA: 4.90 ACREQUIRED PARKING SPACES:2 STALLS/UNIT * 150 UNITS 300 SPACES1.5 STALLS/UNIT * 150 UNITS 225 SPACES (BY VARIANCE)PROPOSED PARKING SPACES (UNDERGROUND - SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS):9.5' X 20' 33 SPACES9.5' X 18' 130 SPACESADA 4 SPACESPROVIDED: 167 SPACESPROPOSED PARKING SPACES (OUTSIDE):9.5' X 20' 28 SPACES9.5' X 18' 51 SPACESADA 4 SPACESPROVIDED: 83 SPACESTOTAL PROVIDED: 250 SPACESBUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS:FRONT YARD SETBACK (NORTH) 30 FEETSIDE YARD SETBACK (EAST & WEST) 20 FEETREAR YARD SETBACK (SOUTH) 20 FEETPARKING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS:FRONT YARD SETBACK (NORTH)XX FEETSIDE YARD SETBACK (EAST & WEST)XX FEETREAR YARD SETBACK (SOUTH)XX FEET11. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - NORMAL DUTY (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)2. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTY (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)3. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - MATCH IN KIND4. CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)5. CONCRETE SIDEWALK - MATCH EXISTING6. CONCRETE PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)7. CONCRETE PAVEMENT - MATCH IN KIND8. CONCRETE STOOP (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)9. B-618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)10. D-418 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)11. FLUSH CONCRETE CURB (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)12. TRANSITION FROM FLUSH CONCRETE CURB TO 4" OR 6" CURB (SEEGRADING PLAN)13. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - MATCH IN KIND14. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - MATCH EXISTING15. CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)16. CURB CUT (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)17. CURB CUT WITH RIP RAP (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)18. TRENCH DRAIN19. ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)20. ACCESSIBLE RAMP (SEE DETAIL X/CXXX)21. 4" HIGH VISIBILITY SOLID WHITE PAINT (SEE NOTE XXXXXXXX)22. 4" POLY PREFORMED PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKINGS (SEENOTE XXXXX)23. CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKINGS (SEED ETAIL X/CXXX)24. X' TALL, BLACK COATED, CHAIN LINK FENCE (SEE NOTE XXXXXXXX)25. X' WIDE CANTILEVER SLIDE GATE (BLACK COATED CHAIN LINK, 6'TALL26. RETAINING WALL27. LANDSCAPE AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS)28. RAIN GARDEN (SEE GRADING PLAN)29. CANOPY (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)30. TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH DUMPSTER (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)31. BICYCLE RACK (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)32. MONUMENT SIGN (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)33. SECURITY LIGHT (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)34. TRANSFORMER (SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SIZE AND EXACTLOCATION)KEYNOTESAA. STOP SIGN R1-1 (30" X 30") - 1 SIGNB. HANDICAP PARKING SIGN R7-8M (12" X 18") - NO SIGNC. HANDICAP PARKING SIGN R7-8M (12" X 18") WITH VANACCESSIBLE SIGN R7-8B (12" X 6") - 4 SIGND. KEEP RIGHT SIGN R4-7c (24" X 30") - 1 SIGNSIGN SCHEDULE (PER MN MUTCD)SITE DATA1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CONSTRUCTION NOTESON C001 PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.NOTESXX1136 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTAFROST AVENUE APARTMENTSDJR ARCHITECTUREMINNEAPOLIS, MN( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALEE1, Attachment 9 CDRB Packet Page Number 26 of 86 FROST AVE. E.PHALEN PLACEFENTON AVENUE////////EMTRTRTRTTHHHHHHTSSSS|||||||||||||||||||895895896897898899900900901902903900898899901902903890895 900905886887887887887887888889889889891 892893894896 897898899901902903904906907908885890895900883884886886886 887887 887888889891892893894896897898899901902903904890895887888889891892893894896890886887887887888888888889891892893894895895896896896896H0.6%900905899901902903904906907908895895900905896896897897898898899899901902903904906900900898899899899901902903900900 898898899899896897898899895891891892893894896897898899895892892893893894894895 896897898 899 896897898899886887888888888890887888889891892890895889891892893894896897898885885890895884884886886887887887887887888889891892893894896897898885885885884884884886886886886887887887887888888-8.1%-2.0%MA 895.55±MA 895.50±C 896.23C 896.23C 896.32C 896.32892893894895895894894 896896897898GENXFMRHHH//0808909779090043559000293910909928900989899990095999688898766888589999 822298898 168978689798988898989 8698988888888889483888899888897888888888786888578888688788888888788688888488588888888688886866689898955//99999698888989896688998007799990044339008080020211909779999009090900555900003388900222909090000096999998888979799779898898989888898 668888547 89999999228998889898990088 884489888338888888888888989998888998888887788888888888887788888888587878588887878888888664888888888888888888888888888886688888888888445558888888888788888886688888886869099088080890997776999000909055559999977790003333900090909090222905444880900003338889999888999020202666 77779090909011118888 888 8888999999999992221898989 888889////000989898898888888888888888888888789898989699989998888888888888888888888844498989897979797899993339888888888899977799999998999969998888889898989895555888888888888888888888888888887777858585857888899996668989898888888888885888888666688878888878787888888888666688868888888888888888866668888888888686868688884444888555588888888888888866668888888888888888888484877788488888888888884488448887877788444889522154999988888856998859989899894889 4 885968858989899899889388222885589898994899008 88489898888855 556SY (3)NM (5)SY (3)BL (3)SL (2)CH (3)SP (4)NP (4)CF (7)CV (3)GL (2)LL (3)MT (3)LL (2)KF (13)GL (2)LL (3)LL (3)KF (6)GL (17)CV (12)TY (4)GL (2)LL (3)TY (6)KF (9)GL (2)LL (3)KF (6)TY (4)GL (2)LL (3)KF (7)KF (6)TY (4)LL (2)GL (2)LL (3)AJ (6)PD (6)SE (11)DB (1)KF (8)GL (6)KF (10)SE (11)PD (5)SL (2)SL (2)DB (3)AJ (8)CH (3)ARTIFICIAL PET TURFGL (2)CV (3)GL (2)CV (3)GL (2)NS (43)CV (3)CV (3)CV (3)GL (2)GL (2)GL (2)GL (2)MT (3)NS (16)NS (12)AJ (5)MJ (2)AJ (5)MJ (2)GL (2)GL (2)GL (2)AJ (5)AJ (5)MJ (4)AF (33)PD (34)PD (26)AJ (8)PD (5)NS (6)DB (6)NS (27)SJ (12)SJ (12)AF (27)RS (14)NS (15)DB (6)PD (5)GL (15)CV (8)AF (17)DB (4)GL (2)GL (2)GL (7)CH (1)CH (2)GL (4)NP (3)LP (8)CF (7)NP (7)NV (3)QA (3)LP (2)NR (4)LP (3)NV (5)SP (5)SODSODSODSODSODSODSODSODSODSODSODSODSODSODSODSODSOD4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH4" MULCH4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH4" MULCH4" MULCHRD (13)RD (13)RS (3)GL (2)RS (20)WL (34)AF (6)WL (34)AF (6)GL (2)GL (2)GL (2)RS (3)RS (20)AF (13)KF (13)AF (8)GL (2)GL (2)AF (8)KF (10)GL (2)AF (3)LL (4)LL (4)GL (2)GL (2)LL (5)WL (6)WL (6)LL (11)MJ (4)CV (4)MJ (7)CV (4)MJ (4)4" MULCH4" MULCH4" MULCH4" MULCH4" MULCH4" MULCH4" MULCH4" MULCH4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGING4" MULCH & EDGINGSODSY (5)BL (3)NO TREES PROVIDED DUE TOUNDERGROUND PARKINGORNAMENTAL TREES PROVIDED DUE TOADJACENT UNDERGROUND PARKINGNO TREES PROVIDED DUE TOADJACENT UNDERGROUND PARKINGNO TREES PROVIDED DUE TOADJACENT UNDERGROUND PARKINGSODSODSODI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPEARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.SIGNATURE:____________________JOSEPH L. SCHEFFLERPROJECT NUMBERPROJECT NAMESHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLE08-19-2022REVIEWDate:License #:PLAN-TypeSITE PLANNING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMinneapolis, MN info@plan-type.com5559708-19-2022DRAWN BYPROJECT MANAGERLOUIEJ + LFROST AVEAPARTMENTS1136 FROST AVE,MAPLEWOOD, MNXXXXISSUE LOGLANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSxONE (1) OVERSTORY TREE PER PARKING LOT ISLANDxBUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPINGxBOULEVARD TREES AT REGULAR INTERVALSBETWEEN SIDEWALK AND ROAD (MIN. WIDTH 5')NOTES:xOBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR PLANTING IN ALL R.O.W. AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICHMAY EFFECT THEIR WORK.xCOMPLETE WORK PER OWNERS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND COORDINATE WORK WITH OTHERSON SITE.xALL PLANT MATERIALS TO BE GUARANTEED ONE (1) FULL YEAR FROM THE COMPLETION ANDACCEPTANCE BY OWNER, WITH ONE TIME REPLACEMENT AT APPROPRIATE TIMExREPLACEMENT TOPSOIL (WHEN REQUIRED) SHOULD BE CLEAN, FREE OF DEBRIS, ROCKS ANDWEEDS.xVERIFY TOPSOIL DEPTH AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY DEFICIENCY.xSOD TO BE A KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED VARIETY. NO GUARANTEE ON SOD EXCEPT SOD THAT ISNOT ACCEPTABLE AT TIME OF COMPLETION. STAKE SOD ON SLOPES 3:1 AND GREATER.xWHERE EXISTING HARDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO BE REPLACED WITH LANDSCAPING, PROVISIONSSHOULD BE TAKEN TO COORDINATE EXCAVATION OF SUBSOIL TO A DEPTH OF 6" WITH GRADINGCONTRACTOR. REPLACE WITH COMPACTED TOPSOIL. ALL AREAS TO BE LANDSCAPED AND SODDEDSHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH AND EVEN.xSOD ALL AREAS WHICH ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING ALL R.O.W. AND ADJACENTPROPERTIES.xPROVIDE BLANKET ON ALL SEEDED AREAS THAT ARE SLOPED. MULCH APPLICATION FOR ALL OTHERSEEDED AREAS SHALL BE HYDROMULCH OR DISCED STRAW DEPENDING ON SEED TYPE.xINSTALL BLACK VINYL EDGING AROUND ALL PLANTING BEDS AS SHOWN ON PLAN.xMULCH TO BE FINELY SHREDDED, UNDYED, HARDWOOD ORGANIC MULCH INSTALLED TO 4" DEPTH.xxNO WEED FABRIC BARRIER BENEATH ORGANIC MULCHES.xxNO EDGING AROUND TREES OUTSIDE OF SHRUB BEDS.xROCK MULCH SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIAMETER WASHED RIVER ROCK INSTALLED TO 3" DEPTH WITHAPPROVED WEED FABRIC BARRIER.xINSTALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM PER IRRIGATION PLAN. IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOULD ENCOMPASSALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WITH SOD AND PLANTINGS. R.O.W. TO BE IRRIGATED FROM SPRINKLERHEADS LOCATED WITHIN PROPERTY BOUNDARY. MINIMIZE OVER SPRAY.xxCOORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ALL PVC SLEEVES UNDER DRIVE AREAS WITH GENERALCONTRACTOR.xCLEAN ALL PAVEMENT AREAS AFTER ALL LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE AND ACCEPTED BYOWNER, DAILY CLEANING TO BE COMPLETED IF REQUIRED BY THE MUNICIPALITY.SCARIFY & SPREADROOT MASSOVER-EXCAVATE 6"SUBGRADEREMOVE DEAD &BROKEN BRANCHESEXCAVATE ROOT FLARE,PLACE AT FINISHGRADE4" DEPTH MULCHFINISH GRADEPROTECT MAIN LEADER,REMOVE DEAD &BROKEN BRANCHESSTAKE & GUY AS NEEDED4" DEPTH MULCH, DONOT PLACE WITHIN 2"OF TRUNKEXCAVATE ROOT FLARE,PLACE AT FINISHGRADECUT & REMOVE ALLTWINE, BURLAP & WIREBASKET, PLACE ONUNDISTURBED SOILSUBGRADEWRAP TREE, FALLINSTALLATION ONLYFINISH GRADESOD - --- SYEDGING - --- LFMULCH - --- CYDECIDUOUS TREESCH2.5" CAL. B&B 50'H x 50'WCOMMON HACKBERRYCeltis occidentalisNM2.5" CAL. B&B 50'H x 35'WNORTHWOOD MAPLEAcer rubrum 'Northwood'SL2.5" CAL. B&B 50'H x 30'WSKYLINE HONEYLOCUSTGleditsia tricanthos var. inermis 'Skycole'QA2" CAL. B&B 40'H x 20'WQUAKING ASPENPopulus temuloidesLANDSCAPE PLANT LEGENDORNAMENTAL TREESDB1.5" CAL. B&B 30'H x 8'WDAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCHBetula platyphylla 'Fargo'EVERGREEN TREESNPB&B 50'H x 30'WNORWAY PINEPinus resinosaSPB&B 40'H x 30'WSCOTCH PINEPinus sylvestrisCFB&B 30'H x 15'WCONCOLOR FIRAbies concolorMTB&B 10'H x 6'WMUGO TANNENBAUMPinus mugo 'Tannenbaum'SJB&B15'H x 4'WSPARTAN JUNIPERJuniperus chinensis 'Spartan'6' HT6' HT6' HT36" HT4' HTBL2.5" CAL. B&B 50'H x 25'WBOULEVARD LINDENTilia americana 'Boulevard'SY2.5" CAL. B&B 60'H x 45'WEXCLAMATION! SYCAMOREPlatanus x acerifolia 'Morton Circle'NRB&B 20'H x 20'WNORTHERN REDBUDCercis canadensis2" CAL.9651161242114914624LPB&B 25'H x 10'WLIMBER NORTHERN BLUE PINEPinus flexillis 'Northern Blue'6' HT13SHRUBSNV#5 CONT. POT 20'H x 10'W8NANNYBERRY VIBURNUMViburnum lentago-- SY-- SYMN STATE SEED MIX 34-262 WET PRAIRIE (OR APPROVEDEQUAL).MN STATE SEED MIX 35-221 - DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL (ORAPPROVED ALTERNATE).SPRING SEEDING TO BE BETWEEN MARCH 15TH - MAY 15TH.FALL SEEDING TO BE BETWEEN AUGUST 15TH - OCTOBER 15TH.xNO SUMMER SEEDING ALLOWED.xPROVIDE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON ALL SIDE SLOPESAJPOT 6'H x 4'W42AMBER JUBILEE NINEBARKPhysocarpus opulifolius 'Jefam'MJPOT 5'H x 6'W23MANEY JUNIPERJuniperus chinensis 'Maneyi'AFPOT5'H x 4'W121ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOODCornus stolonifera 'Farrow'TYPOT 3'H x 4'W18TAUNTON YEWTaxus x media 'Tauntonii'GLPOT 2'H x 8'W105GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMACRhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'SEPOT 1.5'H x 2'W22AUTUMN FIRESedum x 'Autumn Fire'KF#1 CONT. POT 4'H x 3'W95KARL FORESTER FEATHER REED GRASSCalamagrotis x acutiflora 'Karl Forester'NS#1 CONT. POT 4'H x 2.5'W119NORTHWIND SWITCH GRASSPanicum virgatum 'Northwind'ORNAMENTAL GRASSESPERENNIALS#2 CONT.#2 CONT.#2 CONT.#2 CONT.#2 CONT.#1 CONT.LLPOT5'H x 5'W48LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEAHydrangea paniculata 'Jane'#3 CONT.RSPOT 4'H x 3'W60RUSSIAN SAGESalvia yangii#1 CONT.PD#1 CONT. POT 3'H x 3'W81PRAIRIE DROPSEEDSporobolus heterolepisCVPOT 6'H x 6'W46COMPACT AMERICAN VIBURNUMViburnum trilobum 'Bailey Compact'#2 CONT.LANDSCAPEPLANL100RDPOT 1.5'H x 2'W26RUBY STELLA DAYLILYHemerocallis 'Ruby Stella'WLPOT 2.5'H x 2.5'W80WALKER'S LOW CATMINTNepeta faassenii 'Walkers Low'#1 CONT.#1 CONT.E1, Attachment 10 CDRB Packet Page Number 27 of 86 FROST AVE. E.PHALEN PLACEFENTON AVENUE////////EMTRTRTRTTHHHTSSSS|||||||||||||||||||895895900900900890895 900905885890895900890895890895895113.10 (P)393.10(P)393.15(P)393.14(P)N00°17'40"W 394.97S89°32'53"W 260.05N00°19'12"W 395.03N00°19'12"W 395.05N00°19'58"W 279.62N89°39'10"E 130.00N00°20'45"W 115.22S89°32'53"W 260.05N89°31'58"E 129.94N89°31'58"E 259.880.6%900905899901902903904906907908895895900905896896897897898898899899901902903904906900900898899899899901902903900900 898898899899896897898899895891891892893894896897898899895892892893893894894895 896897898 899 896897898899886887888888888890887888889891892890895889891892893894896897898885885890895884884886886887887887887887888889891892893894896897898885885885884884884886886886886887887887887888888-8.1%-2.0%MA 895.55±MA 895.50±C 896.23C 896.23C 896.32C 896.32892893894895895894894 896896897898GENXFMRHHHT01: 23" BLUESPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T02: 12"BLACK LOCUST(SIGNIFICANT)T03: 16"SIBERIAN ELMT04: 14"SIBERIAN ELMT05: 15"SIBERIAN ELMT06: 16"SIBERIAN ELMT07: 12"WHITE SPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T08: 13"WHITE SPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T09: 11"WHITE SPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T10: 13"WHITE SPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T11: 15" BLUESPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T12: 13"WHITE SPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T13: 18"WHITE SPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T14: 14"WHITE SPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T15: 19"WHITE SPRUCE(SIGNIFICANT)T16: 16"SIBERIAN ELMT18: 12"SIBERIAN ELMT17: 23"SIBERIAN ELMT20: 13"SIBERIAN ELMT19: 13"SIBERIAN ELMT21: 13"SIBERIAN ELMT22: 12"SIBERIAN ELMT23: 12"SIBERIAN ELMI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPEARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.SIGNATURE:____________________JOSEPH L. SCHEFFLERPROJECT NUMBERPROJECT NAMESHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLE08-19-2022REVIEWDate:License #:PLAN-TypeSITE PLANNING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMinneapolis, MN info@plan-type.com5559708-19-2022DRAWN BYPROJECT MANAGERLOUIEJ + LFROST AVEAPARTMENTS1136 FROST AVE,MAPLEWOOD, MNXXXXISSUE LOGTREEPRESERVATIONPLANL300TREE REMOVAL CALCULATIONSIF 20 PERCENT OR MORE TOTAL SIGNIFICANT AND SPECIMENTREE DIAMETER INCHES ARE REMOVED, APPLICANT SHALLMITIGATE ALL SIGNIFICANT AND SPECIMEN DIAMETER INCHESUSING THE TREE MITIGATION/REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE INACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING FORMULAS:A = TOTAL DIAMETER INCHES OF SIGNIFICANT TREES LOST AS ARESULT OF THE LAND ALTERATION (INCLUDES SIGNIFICANTAND SPECIMEN TREES)B = TOTAL DIAMETER INCHES OF SIGNIFICANT TREES SITUATEDON THE PROPERTY (INCLUDES SIGNIFICANT AND SPECIMENTREES)C = TREE REPLACEMENT CONSTANT (1.5)D = TOTAL DIAMETER INCHES OF SPECIMEN TREES SAVED *E = REPLACEMENT TREES (NUMBER OF CALIPER INCHES)[((A/B -0.2) X C) X A] - [D/2] = E[((163/163 -0.2) X 1.5) X 163] - [0/2] = 196"TOTAL REMOVED TREES (DIAMETER) = 163"TOTAL REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED = 196"TOTAL REPLACEMENT TREES PROVIDED = 253.5"DEFINITIONSSIGNIFICANT TREE MEANS A HEALTHY TREE MEASURING AMINIMUM OF SIX INCHES IN DIAMETER FOR HARDWOODDECIDUOUS TREES, EIGHT INCHES IN DIAMETER FOR CONIFERTREES, 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER FOR SOFTWOOD DECIDUOUSTREES, AND SPECIMEN TREE. BUCKTHORN OR OTHER NOXIOUSWOODY PLANTS OR TREES AS DETERMINED BY THE EEDDDIRECTOR ARE NOT CONSIDERED A SIGNIFICANT TREE SPECIESAT ANY DIAMETER.SPECIMEN TREE MEANS A TREE OF ANY SPECIES THAT IS 28INCHES IN DIAMETER OR GREATER, EXCEPT INVASIVE SPECIES.SPECIMEN TREES MUST HAVE A LIFE EXPECTANCY OF GREATERTHAN TEN YEARS, HAVE A RELATIVELY SOUND AND SOLID TRUNKWITH NO EXTENSIVE DECAY OR HOLLOW, AND HAVE NO MAJORINSECTS, PATHOLOGICAL PROBLEM, OR DEFECTS. SPECIMENTREES ARE VALUED FOR THEIR SIZE AND THEIR LEGACY.NOTE***ALL TREES ONSITE TO BE REMOVED******SIBERIAN ELMS WERE NOT COUNTED TOWARDSREPLACEMENT DUE TO BEING INVASIVE***23" CAL. SIGNIFICANTBLUE SPRUCEPicea pungensEXISTING TREE LEGENDSIZECATAGORYSPECIESID#T01STATUSSIGNIFICANTBLACK LOCUSTT02SIBERIAN ELMT03INSIGNIFICANTT04INSIGNIFICANTT05T06SIGNIFICANTT07SIGNIFICANTT08SIGNIFICANTT09REMOVESIGNIFICANTT10SIGNIFICANTT11SIGNIFICANTT12SIGNIFICANTT13SIGNIFICANTT14SIGNIFICANTT15REMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVE 0" CAL.0" CAL.12" CAL.0" CAL.0" CAL.12" CAL.23" CAL.REMOVEDCAL. INCHESREMOVAL TOTAL: 163" CAL.REMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVET16T17T18INSIGNIFICANTT19INSIGNIFICANTT20T21T22T23REMOVEREMOVE0" CAL.REMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVEREMOVE12" CAL.16" CAL.14" CAL.15" CAL.16" CAL.12" CAL.13" CAL.11" CAL.15" CAL.13" CAL.18" CAL.13" CAL.14" CAL.19" CAL.16" CAL.23" CAL.12" CAL.13" CAL.13" CAL.13" CAL.12" CAL.12" CAL.SIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMSIBERIAN ELMWHITE SPRUCEWHITE SPRUCEWHITE SPRUCEWHITE SPRUCEWHITE SPRUCEWHITE SPRUCEWHITE SPRUCEWHITE SPRUCEBLUE SPRUCEINSIGNIFICANTINSIGNIFICANTINSIGNIFICANTINSIGNIFICANTINSIGNIFICANTINSIGNIFICANTINSIGNIFICANTINSIGNIFICANT13" CAL.11" CAL.13" CAL.15" CAL.13" CAL.18" CAL.14" CAL.19" CAL.0" CAL.0" CAL.0" CAL.0" CAL.0" CAL.0" CAL.0" CAL.Robinia pseudoacaciaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaUlmus pumilaPicea glaucaPicea glaucaPicea glaucaPicea glaucaPicea glaucaPicea glaucaPicea glaucaPicea glaucaPicea pungensE1, Attachment 11 CDRB Packet Page Number 28 of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ttachment 12 CDRB Packet Page Number 29 of 86 FROST AVE. E.PHALEN PLACE PORTION OF EDWARD STREET TO BE VACATEDFENTON AVENUEFRANK STREET VACATED ALLEY VACATED ALLEY PORTION OF FENTONAVENUE TO BE VACATEDPORTION OF FRANK STREET AVENUE TO BE VACATED S00°17'40"E 424.96S89°31'58"W 289.8630.00N00°19'12"WS89°31'58"W 189.94N00°19'58"W 279.62 S89°39'10"W130.00N00°20'45"W 115.22 N89°32'53"E 610.11DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING PROPERTYCommitment Number: NCS-1055437-MPLS:Lots 1 to 13, inclusive, Block 2, Kavanagh andDawson's Addition to Gladstone, and thatportion of the vacated alley which accrued tosaid lots by reason of the vacation thereof,according to the recorded plat on file in theoffice of the Register of Deeds within and forRamsey County, Minnesota. Abstract PropertyCommitment Number: NCS-1077071-MPLS:Lots 1 through 20, inclusive, in Block 1,Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition toGladstone, together with the vacated alley insaid Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota.Abstract PropertySurvey Notes1. Bearings are based on the Ramsey CountyCoordinate System.2. This survey is based on the legal descriptionas provided by the Client3. This Surveyor has not abstracted the landshown hereon for easements, rights of wayor restrictions of record which may affectthe title or use of the land4. Do not reconstruct property lines frombuilding ties5. Proposed parcel to be a contiguous join ofNCS-1055437-MPLS andNCS-1077071-MPLS6. Proposed use of parcel to be an ApartmentBuilding with amenitiesLot DivisionExhibitProposed Legal DescriptionsLots 1 to 10, inclusive, Block 2, Kavanagh and Dawson's Additionto Gladstone, and that portion of the vacated alley and vacatedEdward StreetLots 11 to 13, inclusive, Block 2, Kavanagh and Dawson's Additionto Gladstone, and that portion of the vacated alleyLots 1 through 20, inclusive, in Block 1, Kavanagh and Dawson'sAddition to Gladstone, together with the vacated alley, and thatpart of vacated Frank Street North and Fenton Avenue which lieseast of the most westerly extent and south of the most northerlyextend of said Block 1, Ramsey County, Minnesota.E1, Attachment 13CDRB Packet Page Number 30 of 86 &RS\ULJKW'-5$UFKLWHFWXUH,QF$(;7(5,255(1'(5,1*60DSOHZRRG010$3/(:22'$3$570(176 )5267$9(/22.,1*($67E1, Attachment 14 CDRB Packet Page Number 31 of 86 &RS\ULJKW'-5$UFKLWHFWXUH,QF$(;7(5,255(1'(5,1*60DSOHZRRG010$3/(:22'$3$570(176 )5267$9(/22.,1*:(67E1, Attachment 14 CDRB Packet Page Number 32 of 86 &RS\ULJKW'-5$UFKLWHFWXUH,QF$0$7(5,$/%2$5'0DSOHZRRG010$3/(:22'$3$570(176 E1, Attachment 14 CDRB Packet Page Number 33 of 86 3523(57</,1(3523(57</,1(/(9(/ /(9(/ 72)227,1* /(9(/3 /(9(/ /(9(/ 522)75866%($5,1* /(9(/ 72522)6+($7+,1* 723$5$3(7 /5(6,'(17,$//5(6,'(17,$//5(6,'(17,$//5(6,'(17,$/33$5.,1*352326('6725<$3$570(17%8,/',1*29(53$57,$//<(;326('81'(5*5281'3$5.,1*/5(6,'(17,$//5(6,'(17,$//5(6,'(17,$//5(6,'(17,$/72&251(53$5$3(7 /5(6,'(17,$/&RS\ULJKW'-5$UFKLWHFWXUH,QF$6,7( %8,/',1*6(&7,2160DSOHZRRG010$3/(:22'$3$570(176 (DVW:HVW6LWH6HFWLRQ (QWLWOHPHQWV %XLOGLQJ6HFWLRQ E1, Attachment 14 CDRB Packet Page Number 34 of 86 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: Frost Avenue Apartments 1136/1160 Frost Avenue East PROJECT NO: 22-25 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Assistant City Engineer DAT E: 9-12-2022 PLAN SET: Civil plans dated August 2022 REPORTS: None The applicant is seeking city approval to develop a new five-story, 150-unit multi -family housing building and associated site amenities at 1136/1160 Frost Avenue . The applicant is requesting a review of the current design. The amount of disturbance on this site is greater than ½ acre . As such, the applicant is required to meet the City’s stormwater quality, rate control, and other stormwater management requirements. The applicant is proposing to meet these requirements via the use of filtration basins. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents and calculations for final review. The following are engineering review comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Drainage and Stormwater Management 1)A large portion of the parking lot and entrance drive are sloped towards the vicinity of the underground parking garage entrance. The grading plan shall be modified to ensure overflow from these areas is not routed into the parking garage entrance area. An emergency overflow shall be provided in this area, at least 1-foot below the highpoint between the garage entry drive and the parking lot. The applicant shall work with the City on the intent of this requirement. 2)A stormwater management plan shall be submitted, including hydraulic calculations, to depict how the project is meeting the City and Watershed District’s stormwater management standards. 3)The project shall be submitted to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) for review. All conditions of RWMWD shall be met. E1, Attachment 15 CDRB Packet Page Number 35 of 86 4)A joint storm water maintenance agreement shall be prepared and signed by the owner for the proposed filtration basin, infiltration basins, pretreatment devices, and underground detention system. The Owner shall submit a signed copy of the joint storm- water maintenance agreement with the RWMWD to the City. 5)The lowest floor elevation (LFE) of the proposed building shall be set at least 2-feet above the 100-year high water elevation of the proposed filtration basins. Likewise, the LFE shall be set at least 1-foot above the designated emergency overflow elevation. 6)An emergency overflow for the filtration basins shall be identified on the plans. This overflow shall be properly stabilized to prevent erosion during an overflow event. 7)Pre-treatment of stormwater before discharge into filtration basins is required. A minimum 3-foot deep sump or similar pre-treatment shall be installed on MH-1 and CBMH-1 to provide pre-treatment and sediment removal upstream of the proposed filtration basins. Grading and Erosion Control 8)All slopes shall be 3H:1V or flatter. 9)Inlet protection devices shall be installed on all existing and proposed onsite storm sewer until all exposed soils onsite are stabilized. This includes storm sewer on adjacent streets that could potentially receive construction related sediment or debris. 10)A double row of heavy-duty silt fencing is required long the south-eastern and eastern property line to prevent sediment from leaving the site into the adjacent Gladstone Savanna infiltration basins. 11)Adjacent streets and parking areas shall be swept as needed to keep the pavement clear of sediment and construction debris. 12)All pedestrian facilities shall be ADA compliant. 13)The total grading volume (cut/fill) shall be noted on the plans. 14)A copy of the project SWPPP and NDPES Permit shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 15)The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project. A SAC determination is required. E1, Attachment 15 CDRB Packet Page Number 36 of 86 16)All modifications to the water system shall be reviewed by Saint Paul regional Water Services. All requirements of SPRWS shall be met. 17)All new sanitary sewer service piping shall be schedule 40 PVC or SDR35. Other 18) The existing paver crosswalk on Frost Avenue, proposed for relocation as a part of this project, includes a significant structure beneath the surface. This consists of a concrete trough, drainage ports, geotextile fabric, and a free-draining sand bedding material for the pavers to sit on. This structure shall be restored to its original construction in the proposed location. The City will provide record drawings to aid in the reconstruction of this item. 19)The enhanced crosswalk signs shall be reinstalled in the location of the proposed paver crossing location. 20)The replacement of the paver cross-walk will require a detour of Frost Avenue. The applicant shall provide a detour plan for all work within Frost Avenue. This work shall be coordinated to minimize the length of the required detour. 21)All work within Frost Avenue right-of-way shall be restored per the City’s right-of-way ordinance. Unique features like paver edgers and plantings within the modified median areas shall be restored in like-kind. Pavement replacement shall be full lane width. Smaller patches of the pavement are not allowed. 22)The existing sidewalk along Frost Avenue shall be protected throughout construction. Damaged portions of the sidewalk shall be replaced with the same materials and at the same thicknesses as are existing. 23)The applicant shall provide a sidewalk easement along Frost Avenue for those portions of the sidewalk lying outside of the public right-of-way. 24)The applicant shall provide a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the portion of the Frank Street right-of-way proposed for vacation. 25)The applicant shall provide a self-renewing letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of 125% of the proposed site improvements including earthwork, grading, erosion control, site vegetation establishment (sod, seed, etc.), aggregate base, and paving. Public Works Permits The following permits are required by the Maplewood Public Works Department for this project. The applicant should verify the need for other City permits with the Building Department. E1, Attachment 15 CDRB Packet Page Number 37 of 86 26)Right-of -way permit 27)Grading and erosion control permit 28)Storm Sewer Permit 29)Sanitary Sewer Permit -END COMMENTS - E1, Attachment 15 CDRB Packet Page Number 38 of 86 1 Environmental Review Project: Frost Avenue Apartments Date of Plans: August 19, 2022 Date of Review: September 12, 2022 Location: 1136 Frost Avenue Reviewers: Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner (651) 249-2304 , shann.finwall@ci.maplewood.mn.us Background: Reuter Walton Development is proposing a new five-story, 150-unit market-rate development over below-grade parking on the properties located at 1136/1160 Frost Avenue East. The project redevelops the Maplewood Marine site and an adjacent vacant lot. The site is located within the City’s Gladstone Area Redevelopment Neighborhood and is adjacent the Gladstone Savanna and Gladstone Park. There are significant trees on the site. The project must comply with the landscape and tree replacement guidelines specified in the Gladstone Redevelopment plan, tree preservation ordinance, and overall City landscape policies. Gladstone Area Redevelopment Neighborhood The Gladstone Area Redevelopment Plan details overall redevelopment guiding principles, implementation initiatives, and key factors for shaping redevelopment of the Maplewood Marina and adjacent vacant lots. Items pertaining to the environmental review include: •Creation of design principals and policies that create green building and sustainable design. •Weave natural systems and ecological function into the built and recreational fabric. •Design that fosters connections between Gladstone and Flicek Parks. •Incorporation of the Green Street concept on the east side of the site. •Development should take advantage of views of the Savanna and should present a high quality design. •25 percent of vehicle use area should be covered by tree canopy when trees are 2/3 ma ture size. •For each 100 square feet of pavement, 5 square feet of interior landscaping should be provided. E1, Attachment 16 CDRB Packet Page Number 39 of 86 2 Tree Preservation Ordinance: Maplewood’s tree preservation ordinance describes a significant tree as a hardwood tree with a minimum of 6 inches in diameter, an evergreen tree with a minimum of 8 inches in diameter, and a softwood tree with a minimum of 12 inches in diameter. A specimen tree is any tree that is 28 inches in diameter or larger. The ordinance requires any significant tree removed during redevelopment of the site to be replaced based on a tree mitigation calculation. The calculation takes into account the size of a tree removed versus overall significant trees situated on the property. The ordinance encourages the preservation of specimen trees. Tree Removal: The tree inventory plan shows 12 significant trees on the site, equaling 163 caliper inches. Redevelopment of the site will result in the removal of all 12 significant trees. Tree Replacement: The tree preservation ordinance requires the replacement of 196 caliper inches (98 – 2 caliper inch trees). Tree Replacement: The landscape plan shows 154 new trees (ranging in size from 1.5 to 2.5 caliper inches) planted on the site, for a total of 163 caliper inches of replacement trees. It appears the project meets the City’s tree preservation ordinance requirements for replacement trees, but the applicant should submit a revised landscape plan showing additional details as outlined below. Environmental Review Recommendations: 1.Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant must submit a revised landscape plan showing the following details: a.The location and species of all existing boulevard trees and how any new trees will be incorporated into that boulevard tree planting. Note, there are existing City trees located in the Frost Avenue boulevard. The landscape plan shows new trees planted in the boulevard. b.Detailed landscape plan for the infiltration basin, including a list of species, container size, spacing, and quantities to be approved by City staff. Note, large infiltration basins will ideally be planted with deep- rooted native plants. The City requires a portion of the basin to be planted rather than seeded. Using plants rather than seeds hastens establishment and provides a better chance of successful establishment. Basin bottoms and lower elevations almost never establish successfully from seed since the seed is washed away when stormwater flows into the basin. c. Native seed mix maintenance plan with information on maintenance for planting year and years two and three, addressing what maintenance activities will be required and what entity (developer, owner, etc.) will take on this responsibility. d.Details on the removal and replacement of landscaping in the Frost Avenue median due to impacts from construction within the right-of-way. E1, Attachment 16 CDRB Packet Page Number 40 of 86 3 e.Landscape details for the surface parking lot which reflects tree canopy coverage and interior landscaping meet the Gladstone Redevelopment Plan requirements (5 percent of vehicle use area should be covered by tree canopy when trees are 2/3 mature size and for each 100 square feet of pavement, 5 square feet of interior landscaping should be provided). f.How the Gladstone Redevelopment Plan Green Street concept can be incorporated into the east side of the site. The Green Street concept includes a wide sidewalk and extensive landscaping to provide a green appearance. At a minimum, the plan should show additional landscaping and how the development could be connected to the Gladstone Savanna and Gladstone Park with interconnecting trails. 2.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant must: a. Submit building plans that meet the City’s Green Building Code if City financing supports the project. The applicant should also consider other green elements including designing the building to be solar ready and the underground and surface parking lot to be EV charging station ready. b.Submit plans for trash and recycling storage/enclosure that meet City code requirements. 3.Prior to certificate of occupancy, the applicant must: a. Make arrangements with the City for recycling service through the City’s contracted residential recycling program. E1, Attachment 16 CDRB Packet Page Number 41 of 86 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CDRB Packet Page Number 42 of 86 COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Meeting Date September 20, 2022 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Design Review, Multifamily Residential Project, 2615 Maplewood Drive Action Requested: Motion ☐Discussion ☐ Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution ☐ Ordinance ☐Contract/Agreement ☐ Proclamation Policy Issue: In September of 2020, the Community Design Review Board (CDRB) reviewed and approved Mark Paschke’s, of Ayres Associates, request to develop a new three-story, 72-unit apartment building on vacant land located at 2615 Maplewood Drive. Design review approval is good for two years, which lapses this month. The applicant is seeking another two-year approval for the exact same project. The apartment building is an approved use for this site, but the design of the building and site needs to be reviewed and approved by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board. Recommended Act i on : Motion to approve a resolution for design review for project plans date -stamped August 18, 2020, for the 72-unit multi-family housing building to be constructed at 2615 Maplewood Drive. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No ☐ Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0 Financing source(s): ☐ Adopted Budget ☐ Budget Modification ☐ New Revenue Source ☐Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: ☐Community Inclusiveness ☐Financial & Asset Mgmt ☐Environmental Stewardship ☐Integrated Communication Operational Effectiveness ☐Targeted Redevelopment The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on September 8, 2022. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is November 7, 2022 . As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. Background: Since the September 2020 CDRB approval, the applicant has combined the three lots into a single parcel of property and submitted a building permit. The city’s review of the building permit was nearly complete, but the applicant never took the steps to finalize the review to pull an issued F1 CDRB Packet Page Number 43 of 86 permit. As stated in the applicant narrative attached to this report, the applicant found: “…construction bids changed significantly in the three months from our initial bids in November 2020 to our final sworn construction statement in February 2021. Several subcontractor prices increased but the main impact was the lumber pricing and that doubled which greatly affected the project financial pro forma. At that time, we chose to wait four to six months to see if the pricing would settle down in order to move ahead. That waiting period turned into 18 months and though we are seeing increases in a variety of subcontractors since 2021, we are seeing a significant reduction in the lumber pricing which had the biggest effect on our project. The market for this multifamily project has stayed strong and we are looking forward to moving ahead with bidding this winter and hopefully a spring of 2023 construction start.” Staff has attached the staff memo reviewing this project from the September 15, 2020 CDRB meeting as the project again is the same as reviewed two years ago. Please review this memo. To review the project plans, please visit the project website at https://maplewoodmn.gov/AptBuilding. Staff mailed out notices to the neighboring properties alerting them to this request. Staff did not receive any feedback. Reference Information Site Description Campus Size: 8.96 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Land Surrounding Land Uses North: Single Family Homes East: Maplewood Drive and Highway 61 South: Town and Country Manufactured Home Park West: Kohlman Park and Town and Country Manufactured Home Park Planning Existing Land Use: Medium Density Residential Existing Zoning: R3 – Multiple Dwelling Attachments: 1.Design Review Resolution 2.Overview Map 3.Applicant’s Narrative 4.September 15, 2020 CDRB Staff Report F1 CDRB Packet Page Number 44 of 86 DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Mark Paschke, of Ayres Associates, has requested approval of site and design plans for a multi-family housing project. 1.02 The property is located at 2615 Maplewood Drive with a PID of 09-29-22-12 -0014. Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1.That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2.That the design and location of the proposed development are in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and are not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3.That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. Community Design Review Board Action. 3.01 The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the design plans date-stamped August 18, 2020. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2.All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3.Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated September 2, 2020. 4.Meet all requirements in the environmental report, dated September 8, 2020. 5.The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. F1, Attachment 1 CDRB Packet Page Number 45 of 86 6.Rooftop vents and equipment shall be located out of view from all sides of the property. 7.Any identification or monument signs for the project must meet the requirements of the city’s sign ordinance. Identification or monument signs shall be designed to be consistent with the project’s building materials and colors. 8.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a.The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. b.Submit to staff a screening plan detailing that all ordinance requirements are met in terms of screening on the north side of the north parking lot. 9.The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a.Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b.Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lots and driveways. c.Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d.Install all required outdoor lighting. 10.If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a.The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b.The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 11.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. __________ by the Community Design Review Board of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on September 20, 2022. F1, Attachment 1 CDRB Packet Page Number 46 of 86 2615 Maplewood Drive - Overview Map City of Maplewood September 7, 2022 Legend !I 0 475 FeetSource: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Subject Property F1, Attachment 2 CDRB Packet Page Number 47 of 86 Request for CDRB Approval Extension Maplewood Multifamily Apartment Living Project To: City of Maplewood, MN 6 September 2022 Michael Martin – Community Development From: Mathew Frisbie – Frisbie Properties, LLC We received our CDRB from the City of Maplewood two years ago in September of 2020 and we would like to request an extension to continue with the project. The project design and scope has not changed since our approvals in September 2020 with both the city and the watershed district. By February 2021 the building permits with the city were ready and we were moving towards a closing date with the bank and planning on moving ahead. Unfortunately, our construction bids changed significantly in the three months from our initial bids in November 2020 to our final sworn construction statement in February 2021. Several subcontractor prices increased but the main impact was the lumber pricing and that doubled which greatly affected the project financial pro forma. At that time, we chose to wait four to six months to see if the pricing would settle down in order to move ahead. That waiting period turned into 18 months and though we are seeing increases in a variety of subcontractors since 2021, we are seeing a significant reduction in the lumber pricing which had the biggest effect on our project. The market for this multifamily project has stayed strong and we are looking forward to moving ahead with bidding this winter and hopefully a spring of 2023 construction start. Thank you for your patience with us as with work towards a successful project for the site and for the city. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Mathew J. Frisbie, AIA F1, Attachment 3 CDRB Packet Page Number 48 of 86 COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Meeting Date September 15, 2020 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Design Review, Maplewood Living Development, 0 Maplewood Drive Action Requested: Motion ☐Discussion ☐ Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution ☐ Ordinance ☐ Contract/Agreement ☐ Proclamation Policy Issue: Mark Paschke, of Ayres Associates, is proposing to develop a new three-story, 72-unit apartment building on vacant land located on Maplewood Drive, south of the intersection of County Road C East and Maplewood Drive. The apartment building is an approved use for this site but the design of the building and site needs to be reviewed and approved by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board. Recommended Action: Motion to approve a resolution for design review for project plans date-stamped August 18, 2020, for the 72-unit multi-family housing building to be constructed at 0 Maplewood Drive (PIDs: 09-29- 22-12-0009, 09-29-22-12-0010 and 09-29-22-12-0012). Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No ☐ Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0. Financing source(s): ☐ Adopted Budget ☐ Budget Modification ☐ New Revenue Source ☐Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: ☐Financial Sustainability ☐Integrated Communication ☐Targeted Redevelopment Operational Effectiveness ☐Community Inclusiveness ☐Infrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on September 1, 2020. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is October 31, 2020. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 49 of 86 Background: Design Review Site Plan The site will be accessed by three drives coming off Maplewood Drive. A single access point would be north of the building and would lead to the underground garage. Two access points provide access to a one-way drive and parking lot south of the building. The proposed apartment building and parking lots are concentrated on the east side of the lot, preserving buildable land on the west side of the lot. The area of land on the west side of the site, which is also west of a wetland, will not be built on as it is needed for residential density calculations. The building and parking lots meet all required setbacks including the 100 feet setback which is required to the north property line. Building Elevations The height of the three-story building is 34’ 8 7/8” feet – which meets city requirements. The exterior of the building will be comprised of brick, stone, metal panel and cementitious siding with a flat roof. All rooftop equipment will be required to be screened on all sides. Landscaping and Screening There are 143 significant trees equaling 1,996 diameter inches of trees on the property. The applicant is removing 35 significant trees equaling 533.5 diameter inches. Because so many trees are being preserved, the tree ordinance does not call out tree replacement for the development. The applicant’s landscape plan includes 25 new trees, for a total of 50.5 caliper inches. In addition to the trees, numerous shrubs and perennials will be planted around the building. City ordinance requires screening to be installed when light from automobile headlights and other sources would be directed into residential windows – in this case along the north property line in the area of the proposed parking lot. The ordinance states that minimum screening shall consist of a barrier at least six feet in height which provides a minimum opaqueness of 80 percent. If vegetation is used it must provide year-round screening, otherwise, a fence or combination of the two may be used. The applicant’s plans do not explicitly show how this screening requirement can be met year- round. Prior to a building permit being issued, the applicant shall be required to provide a plan showing that the screening requirement is met. Parking The city’s zoning ordinance states multi-family buildings must provide two parking spaces for each unit – with one of the parking spaces being covered. This proposed project will have a total of 144 parking stalls, with 72 parking spaces in the underground parking garage and 72 parking spaces in the two surface lots. Floor Area City ordinance requires a minimum of 580 square feet for both efficiencies and one-bedroom units. The applicant is proposing 31 efficiency units at 580 square feet in size and 36 one-bedroom units ranging from 849 to 907 square feet in size – exceeding the city’s minimum requirement. Two- bedroom units are required to be at least 740 square feet in size. This proposed project’s five two- bedroom units will be 1,024 to 1,058 square feet in size, again exceeding the city’s minimum requirement. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 50 of 86 Wetlands and Shoreland There is a Manage B wetland located in the center of the parcel. The city’s wetland ordinance requires a 50-foot minimum and 75-foot average wetland buffer. The wetland ordinance allows flexibility in instances where, because of the unique physical characteristics of a specific parcel of land, the averaging of buffer width for the entire parcel may be necessary to allow for the reasonable use of the land during a development or construction project. In such cases decreasing the minimum buffer width will be compensated for by increased buffer widths elsewhere in the same parcel to achieve the required average buffer width. This project is meeting the city’s wetland setback requirements. The Shoreland Overlay District for Kohlman Lake allows for 30 percent impervious surface coverage for an apartment complex. The parcel is 8.96 acres. The impervious surface area including the building, parking lot, and sidewalks will cover 1.26 acres. The overall impervious surface area encompasses 14 percent of the parcel, which meets the Shoreland Overlay District requirements. Lighting The applicant’s submitted photometric plan meets all city requirements. Lot Division to Combine Lots Prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued for this project, the applicant will be required to combine the existing three properties that comprise this project into a single site. This is an administrative process that does not require any additional review or approval. Department Comments Engineering Please see Jon Jarosch’s engineering report, dated September 2, 2020, attached to this report. Environmental Please see Shann Finwall’s environmental report, dated September 8, 2020, attached to this report. Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 130 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site for their opinion about this proposal. Staff received seven responses as shown below. 1. One of the reasons we moved here is due to the space around us that protects wildlife habitat. That is incredibly important to us and our values. Building these apartments would have a significant negative impact on the habitat of native wildlife, resulting in displacement. In addition, I am concerned about the increase in traffic. I am a runner, and oftentimes run in the early hours of the morning. I am concerned about the impact increased traffic could have on my safety and comfort level running around the neighborhood. I truly hope this development does not go through and hope you take this into consideration. (Stacey Meade, 1117 County Road C East) F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 51 of 86 2. My uncle, Neal McClellan, who used to live at 1091 County Road C East, died in December and I have inherited his property. I am having the house demolished, per his wishes, and will be selling the property. You asked for input on the proposed apartment. I actually grew up a few houses down from my uncle, and so am familiar with the property and area. I do have a couple of concerns: i. There will be a lot of people moving in there, and I am assuming there will be interest in visiting the park that is west of the development. County Road C does not have a very good shoulders on the street, which is much busier than when I lived there. Will there be constructed a walkway to the park over the wetlands so people can safely access the park? ii. There is no room to park on County Road C. I am wondering, even though there are houses between Co Rd C and the development, if people will want to park on Co Rd C. Are there any plans to expand Co Rd C with wider shoulders that people can park on it? iii. Along with # 2 above, what are Maplewood's plans for Co Rd C, given the increase in traffic that will come with the development? (Lynn Schurrer, 1091 County Road C East) 3. I was pleased to learn that there was not a variance requested and that the construction materials seem to be better than the usual “bricks and sticks” apartments. It sounds like the developer would like to work with the neighbors and I’m glad to hear that. While we all knew that someday development would probably happen behind us, it will certainly impact the value of our properties. Back when we were looking for homes, we passed on any that had an “apartment view.” In fact, having rental property or an apartment nearby was one of the first things our realtor disclosed. Here are some of my concerns and questions. Car noise. I see from the plans the main entrance to the apartment is the parking lot on the north side, along with the garage door on the northwest end of the apartment. My concern is that we will be hearing the cars driving into the lot with the walls of the apartment reflecting the noise. I'm concerned about the noise of the of the garage door opening and closing. With the 9% grade into the garage I worry that our backyards will be lit up with the lights from the cars exiting the building at night. Trees. The trees behind my property are numbers 35-39 green ash on the plans. What is missing on the plans are the two sugar maples nearby. If possible, we would like to have the two sugar maples saved behind our property. They are beautiful and in great shape. I would think it would be a good aesthetic view for the residents of the apartments too. As for Trees 35-39, what is the point of saving any green ash? They will likely be taken by Emerald Ash Borer soon enough. It would be interesting if something like tamarac would take root there, since that was what was in the wetland. The green ash was only able to grow because someone dumped construction debris and fill there. We would be O.K. if some or all of the green ash trees (35-39) were removed to spare the sugar maples. Property to the west of the wetland. From the plans, we were not able to determine what would be plans be for the land west of the wetland. There have been attempts over the years to place a road across the wetland F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 52 of 86 without permission by the city to link up the parcels together. My concern is that there might be a phase 2. (Pete and Nancy Boulay, 1100 County Road C East) 4. In a call made to and summarized by staff – Concerns include disagreement on the location of the property line between resident and projects properties; who is included in the ownership group, concerns about ground water contamination because of this project and concerns about light and noise from apartment residents affecting existing residents. (James Nygard, 1110 County Road C East) 5. Three main opinions that I have – how it changes the existing neighborhood, safety concerns and nature preservation. i. Based on the surrounding neighborhood, three-story building will definitely stick out. There didn’t seem to be enough tree coverage to help it blend in at that height and would easily make it the tallest structure, making lighting a concern. It wasn’t clear to me what lighting would be included in the design and have reservations on how visible / disruptive it would be given the current neighborhood. ii. Concerns on traffic – The addition of potentially 50+ cars daily on County Road C creates a lot of anxiety for me. As it stands today, rarely is the speed limit adhered to and instead folks are going 50+mph on the road. This proposed development would only add to the number of cars using County Road C and have not seen any plans or proposals for minimizing this safety risk. iii. Impact on the wetlands and nature preserve, both in construction and on-going. One of the great things I love about the neighborhood is the nature preserve and the benefit it brings. Concerned about how much additional stress this would place on the ecosystem. During a neighborhood meeting last Winter, there was some discussion around the zoning of this property overall. While in your note it mentions the building is an approved use for the site, there was concern raised at that time that proper community notification was not given for the rezoning of that property in the past and caught everyone by surprised. Do you have any background on when the property was rezoned and how that was resolved? Just want to make sure I fully understand how that process works. Would prefer to see 2-story apartment building or townhomes on this development instead of what is proposed, along with specific details on how it would improve safety / traffic in the area. Feels like that would fit better within the current aesthetics of our neighborhood without placing more burden on the surrounding nature habitat. (Sheryl Sukolsky, 1085 County Road C East) 6. I totally oppose the apartment building going into the vacant lot. Roughly about 20 years ago the owner wanted to build more sites for the manufactured homes (Mobile Homes) and the city denied him, because it was considered wetland and could not be built on. Now 20 years later you are looking to build an apartment complex. This is the opinion of not only myself, but the majority of the residents here, some of which do not have access to, or own computers. There is also some residents of whom DID NOT receive your letter. I have reviewed the crime statistics for our area and it is increasing, if you allow an apartment complex in the area, this will draw more crime to the area with an above ground parking for them to rifle through or steal the entire car. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 53 of 86 Traffic will increase. Property value will go down, making it harder to sell homes in the area, because nobody wants to look at an apartment building and parking lot. The wildlife that we have here will decrease, the kids love feeding the ducks and geese and this year has been the best year for the wood ducks. The eagles and Hawks that prey on the source will be extinct. We have also seen the occasional coyote, deer, mink, raccoon. The geese and ducks have been fed for over 40 years and make this their home. We look forward to them coming back year after year. There was a stream that went from the pond over to County Road C, I do believe that there is an underground water source to Llake Kolhman , when the lake rises and lowers so does the pond. If you build an apartment complex on the land with a few hundred thousand pounds of concrete and steel we will watch it slowly sink. That's why we have our homes releveled every couple of years in the park. Mathew Frisbie from Frisbie Properties says its a short drive to major shopping, yes it is but Maplewood Mall is slowly going down hill, shops are closing because of cost so within 10 years it will be closed all together. why not utilize some of the property at the mall for an apartment complex and maybe it will bring in some new businesses. Please consider the opinion of the residents of Town and Country Mobile Home Park. Most are longtime residents, some have been here between 20-40 years. (Robert McGovern, 1102 Alvarado Drive) 7. Overall I think the plan looks good. It seems to save the wetland areas and the ponding areas. Which is good. Any place with a dog washing station has to be a nice place! The buildings look a little dark and foreboding to me, but I don’t know what current architecture looks like. Maybe they could be a little brighter? I think the whole thing could be moved another 20 to 30 feet south so as not to be so close to the homes on County Rd C. I also hope that there will be some trails down around the pond for those dog owners to walk their dogs. (Donald Christianson, 1111 County Road C East) Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 8.96 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Land Surrounding Land Uses North: Single Family Homes East: Maplewood Drive and Highway 61 South: Town and Country Manufactured Home Park West: Kohlman Park and Town and Country Manufactured Home Park Planning Existing Land Use: Medium Density Residential Existing Zoning: R3 – Multiple Dwelling F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 54 of 86 Attachments: 1. Design Review Resolution 2. Overview Map 3. 2040 Future Land Use Map 4. Zoning Map 5. Wetland Map 6. Shoreland Overlay Map 7. Applicant’s Narrative 8. Site Plan 9. Landscape Plan 10. Building Elevations 11. Jon Jarosch’s Engineering Report, dated September 2, 2020 12. Shann Finwall’s Environmental Report, dated September 8, 2020 13. Applicant’s Plans (separate attachment) F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 55 of 86 DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Mark Paschke, of Ayres Associates, has requested approval of site and design plans for a multi-family housing project. 1.02 The properties are located along Maplewood Drive with the PIDs of 09-29-22-12- 0009, 09-29-22-12-0010 and 09-29-22-12-0012 and are legally described as: That part of Lot 8, W.H. Howard's Garden Lots, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 50 feet westerly of Line A described below. Except the East 455 feet of the West 715 feet of the North 203 feet of said Lot 8. Also except the West 260 feet of said Lot 8. And That part of Lot 7, W.H. Howard's Garden Lots, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 50 feet westerly of Line A described below. Except that part thereof lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 7 distant 200.00 feet east of the Northwest corner of said Lot 7 to the southwest corner of said Lot 7. And That part of Lot 6, W.H. Howard's Garden Lots, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line drawn parallel with and 50 feet westerly of Line A described below. And except that portion lying southerly of a line running from a point on the West line of and 85.7 feet North from the Southwest corner of said Lot 6 ta a paint on the East line of and 19.7 feet South of the Northeast corner of the South 66 feet of said Lot 6. Also excepting therefrom that part of the premises taken for widening of Trunk Highway No. 61 as shown in document No. 1702261. Line A Beginning at a point on the North line of said Section 9, distant 755.6 feet east of the North Quarter corner thereof; thence run southerly at an angle of 90 degrees with said North section line for 540.9 feet; thence deflect to the left on a 20 degrees 00 minute curve (delta angle 30 degrees 52 minutes 15 seconds) for 154.35 feet; thence on tangent to said curve for 125.26 feet; thence deflect to the right on a 20 degrees 00 minute curve (delta angle 31 degrees 36 minutes 04 seconds) for 158.01 feet; thence on tangent to said curve far 93.03 feet; thence deflect to the right on a 02 degrees 30 minutes curve (delta angle 16 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds) for 659.67 feet and there terminating. 1.03 On September 15, 2020, the community design review board reviewed this request. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information to the community design review board. The community design review board considered all of the F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 56 of 86 comments received and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into this resolution. Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. Community Design Review Board Action. 3.01.1 The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site and design plans date-stamped August 18, 2020. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3. Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated September 2, 2020. 4. Meet all requirements in the environmental report, dated September 8, 2020. 5. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 6. Rooftop vents and equipment shall be located out of view from all sides of the property. 7. Any identification or monument signs for the project must meet the requirements of the city’s sign ordinance. Identification or monument signs shall be designed to be consistent with the project’s building materials and colors. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 57 of 86 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a. The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. b. Submit to staff a screening plan detailing that all ordinance requirements are met in terms of screening on the north side of the north parking lot. 10. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Apply for and receive approval for a lot division to combine the three parcels into one. Applicant shall be required to provide proof of Ramsey County recording to city staff. b. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. c. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lots and driveways. d. Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. e. Install all required outdoor lighting. 11. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 12. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. __________ by the Community Design Review Board of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on September 15, 2020. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 58 of 86 Maplewood Living Development City of Maplewood August 20, 2020 2YHUYLHZ0DS Legend !I PURMHFW$UHD 0 350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 59 of 86 Maplewood Living Development City of Maplewood August 20, 2020 )XWXUH/DQG8VH0DS Legend !I Future Land Use - 2040 Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Commercial Public/Institutional Open Space Park PURMHFW$UHD 0 350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 60 of 86 Maplewood Living Development City of Maplewood August 20, 2020 =RQLQJ0DS Legend !I Zoning Open Space/Park Single Dwelling (r1) Multiple Dwelling (r3) Farm (f) Light Manufacturing (m1) PURMHFW$UHD 0 350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 61 of 86 Maplewood Living Development City of Maplewood August 20, 2020 :HWODQG0DS Legend !I Wetlands Manage A Manage B Manage C PURMHFW$UHD 0 350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 62 of 86 Maplewood Living Development City of Maplewood August 20, 2020 6KRUHODQG2YHUOD\0DS Legend !I Shoreland Overlay PURMHFW$UHD 0 350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 63 of 86 Maplewood Multifamily Apartment Living Project Summary To: City of Maplewood, MN 12 August 2020 From: Mathew Frisbie – Frisbie Properties, LLC The following describes the overall project summary. Maplewood Multifamily Apartments Maplewood, MN The Project The site development for this project has a total of 72 units designed around a common park-like courtyard green space and building amenities for apartment living. The building is a three-story apartment building with an additional full lower level parking below grade. The unit mix includes: 31 Large Studio Apartments at 580 s.f. with an addition 120 cu. ft. of storage. 24 One Bedroom Apartments ranging from 643 s.f. to 788 s.f. 12 One Bedroom + Den Apartments ranging from 849 s.f. to 907 s.f. 5 Two Bedroom Apartments ranging from 1,024 s.f. to 1,058 s.f. The project will have a total of 144 parking stalls, with 72 parking spaces in the lower level parking garage and 72 parking spaces on the surface. The apartment building will incorporate common building amenities such as individual member storage, a community room with a kitchenette for gatherings, library and conference area, multi-purpose rooms, fitness room, dog wash room, and management offices. The exterior of the buildings will incorporate brick, stone, metal panel, and cementitious siding/panels with a flat roof. The building will be set back off the adjacent street and residential neighbors with landscaping buffers, walks and courtyards. The anticipated number of employees for this apartment building project will be approximately 3 employees. This will include a director, staff for marketing/activities, and maintenance staff. Note: The site density calculation worksheet is attached. The Location and Demand (Summarized from the market study provided by Viewpoint Consulting Group) This proposed multi-family apartment building will be an open, market-rate housing facility on the 9- acre parcel located on Maplewood Drive. Maplewood is a mature suburban community of about 41,000 people in Ramsey County, on the northeastern side of the Twin Cities Metro Area, which has a seven-county F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 64 of 86 population of over three million. Maplewood is situated about three miles north of Downtown St. Paul, via Interstate 35E. Maplewood covers about 18 square miles surrounded by St. Paul and the suburbs of Little Canada, White Bear Lake, North St. Paul, and Oakdale. With its supply of undeveloped land available for new housing being limited, much of the growth will come from redevelopment of underutilized parcels. More specifically, the Site is a collection of parcels south of County Road C East and west of Maplewood Drive. This location is a block west of Highway 61 and less than a mile north of Highway 36. Both are major four-lane transportation arteries. Interstate 694 is about a mile north of the Site and Interstate 35E is about two miles west of the Site. Thus, the Site has good access to the surrounding metropolitan area. It is a short drive to major shopping. Most notable, Maplewood Mall is about a two-mile drive to the northeast. Many other stores and restaurants surround the Mall, including a Costco on Beam Avenue (less than a mile from the Site). About two miles east of the Site, at the intersection of Highway 36 and White Bear Avenue is a Cub Foods, and two and a half miles east of the Site at Highway 36 and McKnight Road, is a Target. Besides retail, the Site is about a mile and a half-mile drive from St. John’s Hospital (just west of Maplewood Mall). Besides St. John’s Hospital, the other major employer in Maplewood is 3M, which has about 10,000 employees. Overall, the Site is well situated for multifamily housing, including market rate rental. The market demand study shows this site location will support up to 180 of apartments units (not counting the demand for income-based housing or senior housing). Please contact me if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Mathew J. Frisbie, AIA F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 65 of 86 Maplewood Multifamily Apartments - Site Density Calculations 8/12/2020 Total Site Area 390,447 s.f.s.f.8.96 acres Wetland Area 109,641 s.f.s.f.2.52 acres Area Difference w/out Wetland 280,806 s.f.s.f.6.45 acres Density Credits: Base site density per zoning 6.45 acres x10 units/acre 64.46 units 1. Underground Parking 300 s.f.x72 stalls 21,600.00 s.f. =0.50 acres 4.96 units 2. Open Space 100 s.f.x72 units 7,200.00 s.f. =0.17 acres 1.65 units 3. Landscaping 100 s.f.x72units 7,200.00 s.f. =0.17 acres 1.65 units 4. Highrise (4 stories)0 0.00 units 72.73 Total Apartment Units F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 66 of 86 TMULTI-FAMILY HOUSING3 STORY PLUS LOWER LEVEL PARKINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA: ±21,291 SFLEVEL 1: 869.65'LEVEL 2: 881.00'24.0'9.5' (TYP.)5.0'(TYP.)8.0'30'-0" BUILDING SETBACK100'-0" SETBACKSTORMWATERMANAGEMENT AREA15'-0" PARKING BUFFER TO BUILDING24.0'(TYP.)22.6'15.0'22.6'45.0°10.6'22.6'10.6'5.0' (TYP.)EXISTINGTREE (TYP.)EXISTING PROPERTYLINE (TYP.)50' WETLAND SETBACKAAAAADEFFGGCCHHEEXISTINGWETLAND15.0'9.5'MAPLEWOOD DRIVE15'-0" BUILDING SETBACKIVIVR5.0'R5.0'R15.0'R15.0'R2.0'R2.0'R4.5'R10.0'R10.0'QRSEXISTING WATEREDGE (TYP.)EXISTINGWETLANDDELINEATION(TYP.)UU75' WETLAND SETBACK"ONE WAYTRAFFIC" SIGNVVVPP11.1'8.0'18.0'TYP.24.0'TYP.18.0'TYP.21.7'15.8'15.0'28.0'6.0'64.4'66.5'68.7'1.5'TYP.16.8'29.9'17.3'23.0'28.4'6.0'"DO NOTENTER" SIGNCAXXXWWWWBUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY8.96 ACBUILDING AREA21,291 SF (8% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGREQUIRED PARKING144 SPACES @ 2 PERDWELLINGPROPOSED PARKING144 SPACES: 72 INSIDE AND72 OUTSIDEADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED5 STALLS / 8 STALLSPROPERTY SUMMARYMAPLEWOOD LIVING DEVELOPMENTTOTAL PROPERTY AREA8.96 ACEXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA (ON-SITE)0.00 ACEXISTING PERVIOUS AREA (ON-SITE)2.52 ACPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (ON-SITE)1.26 ACPROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (ON-SITE)1.26 ACPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (OFF-SITE)0.23 ACPROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (OFF-SITE)0.13 ACON-STE DISTURBED AREA2.52 ACOFF-SITE DISTURBED AREA0.36 ACTOTAL DISTURBED AREA2.88 ACZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGR3-BPROPOSED ZONINGR3-BPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 15'ROAD = 15'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 100'SIDE = 30'REAR = 30'WETLAND SETBACK50' MINIMUMPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\Frisbie Properties, LLC\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg August 12, 2020 - 10:25pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY DEMARC, DATED 05/08/2020.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 5.96 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9.5' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED.NORTHKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALKEXISTING PIPE BOLLARDMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSMILL AND OVERLAY RESTRIPPED AREASHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONRETAINING WALLPROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN BY OTHERSCOURTYARD - SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANSPROPOSED TRANSFORMERPROPOSED SITE SIGNAGESTOP SIGNRETAINING WALL WITH 4' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCELIGHT POLE (PER SIGN VENDOR PLANS)RIP RAP AT DOWNSPOUTABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXPREPARED FORSITE PLANC400MAPLEWOOD LIVINGDEVELOPMENTEF MAPLEWOODLLCMAPLEWOODMNF1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 67 of 86 LANDSCAPE LEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING3 STORY PLUS LOWER LEVEL PARKINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA: ±21,291 SFLEVEL 1: 869.65'LEVEL 2: 881.00'TMAPLEWOOD DRIVE1L100.1LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT2L100.1LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTALANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.)ABCDESEEDING KEYNOTESSEED WITH MNDOT 22-112: FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 25-131: LOW MAINTENANCE TURF SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-262: DRY SWALE/ POND SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-361: STORMWATER NORTHEAST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 34-171: WETLAND REHABILITATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-221: DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-241: MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 36-211: WOODLAND EDGE SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)22-11225-13133-26133-26233-36134-17135-22135-24136-21122-112CONIFEROUS TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEBHS 3 PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCEB & B6` HT.WHP 7 PINUS STROBUSWHITE PINEB & B6` HT.ORNAMENTAL TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEQUC 2 POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN CLUMPB & B6` HT.RVB 2 BETULA NIGRARIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKB & B6` HT.WSB 3 BETULA POPULIFOLIA `WHITESPIRE`WHITESPIRE BIRCH CLUMPB & B6` HT.OVERSTORY TREECODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTCALSIZEABM 4 ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE`AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEB & B 2.5" CAL.BOL 3 TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD`BOULEVARD LINDENB & B 2.5" CAL.SWO 1 QUERCUS BICOLORSWAMP WHITE OAKB & B 2.5" CAL.CONIFEROUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEBAJ 30 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `BLUE ARROW` BLUE ARROW JUNIPER #5 CONT. 3` OCSGJ 15 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN` SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 CONT. 5` O.C.TAU 17 TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII` TAUTON YEW #5 CONT. 5` O.C.DECIDUOUS SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEAFD 9 CORNUS SERICEA `ARTIC FIRE` ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD #5 CONT. 3` O.C.ANH 26 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE` ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. 4` O.C.DBH 12 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. 3` O.C.GLS 6 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC#5 CONT. 4` O.C.RTD 12 CORNUS SERICEA `BAILEYI`RED TWIG DOGWOOD#5 CONT. 5` O.C.GROUND COVERSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEBEG 171 RUDBECKIA `LITTLE GOLD STAR`LITTLE GOLD STAR RUDBECKIA#1 CONT.15" OCPERENNIALSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGSIZEHOS 8 HOSTA X `KROSSA REGAL`KROSSA RAGAL DAYLILY#1 CONT48 OCKFG 23 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT30" OCPWW 83 ECHINACEA X `POW WOW WILDBERRY`POW WOW WILDBERRY CONEFLOWER #1 CONT24" OCSDO 21 HEMEROCALLIS X `STELLA DE ORO`STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY#1 CONT18" O.C.WLC 5 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW`WALKERS LOW CATMINT#1 CONT30" OCPLANT SCHEDULEThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Frisbie Properties, LLC\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG August 13, 2020 - 12:10amBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL100MAPLEWOOD LIVINGDEVELOPMENTEF MAPLEWOODLLCMAPLEWOODMNREQUIRED: 20' WIDE LANDSCAPE AREAPROVIDED: 20' WIDE LANDSCAPE AREAREQUIRED: SCREENING BETWEEN PARKING LOT AND RESIDENTIAL WINDOWSPROVIDED: SCREENING BETWEEN PARKING LOT AND RESIDENTIAL WINDOWSREQUIRED: SCREENING AROUND TRANSFORMER LOCATIONPROVIDED: ONE SIDE OF TRANSFORMER OPEN FOR ACCESSLANDSCAPE SUMMARYNORTHF1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 68 of 86 CCADMULTI-FAMILY HOUSING3 STORY PLUS LOWER LEVEL PARKINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA: ±21,291 SFLEVEL 1: 869.65'LEVEL 2: 881.00'33-26135-24135-241AADDDTThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\Frisbie Properties, LLC\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG August 13, 2020 - 12:09amBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPEENLARGEMENTSL100.1MAPLEWOOD LIVINGDEVELOPMENTEF MAPLEWOODLLCMAPLEWOODMNLANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTSCALE: 1"=20'L100.11NORTHLANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTSCALE: 1"=20'L100.12NORTHF1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 69 of 86 F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 70 of 86 FIRST FLOOR100'-0"SECOND FLOOR111'-2 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET134'-8 7/8"TRUSS BEARING131'-4 7/8"BASEMENT88'-8"THIRD FLOOR122'-4 3/4"CEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #1)ALUM. STOREFRONTCEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #2)PREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #4)CEMENTITIOUS PANELUTILITY BRICK, TYP.VINYL CLAD WINDOWCEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #2)VINYL CLAD SLIDING DOORINSUL. HOLLOW METAL DOORPREFINISHED O.H. DOOR6" DIA. CONC. FILLED PIPE BOLLARD, PAINT, TYP.PREFINISHED METAL EYEBROWPREFINISHED METAL RAILINGVINYL CLAD WINDOWPRE-FINISHED CANOPY, SOFFIT & FASCIAALUM. STOREFRONTMAGICPAK, TYP. PER UNITFIRST FLOOR100'-0"SECOND FLOOR111'-2 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET134'-8 7/8"TRUSS BEARING131'-4 7/8"THIRD FLOOR122'-4 3/4"CEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #1)CEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #2)PRE-FINISHED CANOPY, SOFFIT & FASCIACEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #3)VINYL CLAD SLIDING DOORCEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #2)UTILITY BRICK, TYP.VINYL CLAD WINDOWPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #4)CEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED METAL EYEBROWPREFINISHED METAL RAILINGMAGICPAK, TYP. PER UNITPROJECT No:THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.Eau Claire Office3433 Oakwood Hills ParkwayEau Claire, Wisconsin 54701(715) 834-3161River Falls Office215 N. Second Street Suite 204River Falls, Wisconsin 54022(715) 426-4908Fax: (715) 426-5866NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION $0%,0 0DSOHZRRG$SDUWPHQWV0DSOHZRRG$SWVUYWMAPLEWOOD LIVING DEVELOPMENTEF MAPLEWOOD LLCMAPLEWOOD DRIVE WEST & ALVARADO DRIVEA20135(/,05(9,(:EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS $8*SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A2011NORTH ELEVATIONSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A2012EAST ELEVATIONMARK DATE DESCRIPTION F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 71 of 86 FIRST FLOOR100'-0"SECOND FLOOR111'-2 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET134'-8 7/8"TRUSS BEARING131'-4 7/8"TOP OF FND.99'-0"THIRD FLOOR122'-4 3/4"CEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #1)VINYL CLAD WINDOWCEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #2)ALUM. PRE-FAB CANOPYALUM. PRE-FAB BALCONIESCEMENTITIOUS PANELALUM. STOREFRONT18" PREFINISHED ALUM. LETTERINGPRE-FINISHED CANOPY, SOFFIT & FASCIACEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #3)PREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #4)CEMENTITIOUS PANELUTILITY BRICK, TYP.VINYL CLAD WINDOWALUM. PRE-FAB CANOPYALUM. PRE-FAB BALCONIESCEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #2)VINYL CLAD SLIDING DOORCEMENTITIOUS PANELMAGICPAK, TYP. PER UNITFIRST FLOOR100'-0"SECOND FLOOR111'-2 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET134'-8 7/8"TRUSS BEARING131'-4 7/8"BASEMENT88'-8"SEE STRUCTURALTOP OF FTNG.THIRD FLOOR122'-4 3/4"CEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #1)CEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #2)ALUM. PRE-FAB CANOPYALUM. PRE-FAB BALCONIESPRE-FINISHED CANOPY, SOFFIT & FASCIANICHIHA PANEL, VINTAGEWOOD, CEDARPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #3)VINYL CLAD WINDOWVINYL CLAD SLIDING DOORALUM. STOREFRONTCEMENTITIOUS PANELPREFINISHED MTL. CAP FLASHING (COLOR #2)UTILITY BRICK, TYP.MAGICPAK, TYP. PER UNITPROJECT No:THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.Eau Claire Office3433 Oakwood Hills ParkwayEau Claire, Wisconsin 54701(715) 834-3161River Falls Office215 N. Second Street Suite 204River Falls, Wisconsin 54022(715) 426-4908Fax: (715) 426-5866NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION $0%,0 0DSOHZRRG$SDUWPHQWV0DSOHZRRG$SWVUYWMAPLEWOOD LIVING DEVELOPMENTEF MAPLEWOOD LLCMAPLEWOOD DRIVE WEST & ALVARADO DRIVEA20235(/,05(9,(:EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS $8*MARK DATE DESCRIPTIONSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A2021SOUTH ELEVATIONSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A2022WEST ELEVATIONF1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 72 of 86 FIRST FLOOR100'-0"SECOND FLOOR111'-2 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET134'-8 7/8"TRUSS BEARING131'-4 7/8"BASEMENT88'-8"THIRD FLOOR122'-4 3/4"FIRST FLOOR100'-0"SECOND FLOOR111'-2 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET134'-8 7/8"THIRD FLOOR122'-4 3/4"PROJECT No:THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.Eau Claire Office3433 Oakwood Hills ParkwayEau Claire, Wisconsin 54701(715) 834-3161River Falls Office215 N. Second Street Suite 204River Falls, Wisconsin 54022(715) 426-4908Fax: (715) 426-5866NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION $0%,0 0DSOHZRRG$SDUWPHQWV0DSOHZRRG$SWVUYWMAPLEWOOD LIVING DEVELOPMENTEF MAPLEWOOD LLCMAPLEWOOD DRIVE WEST & ALVARADO DRIVE1A35(/,05(9,(:COLORED ELEVS $8*SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1A1NORTH ELEVATION (COLORED)SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1A2EAST ELEVATION (COLORED)MARK DATE DESCRIPTION F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 73 of 86 FIRST FLOOR100'-0"SECOND FLOOR111'-2 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET134'-8 7/8"TRUSS BEARING131'-4 7/8"THIRD FLOOR122'-4 3/4"FIRST FLOOR100'-0"SECOND FLOOR111'-2 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET134'-8 7/8"TRUSS BEARING131'-4 7/8"THIRD FLOOR122'-4 3/4"PROJECT No:THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.Eau Claire Office3433 Oakwood Hills ParkwayEau Claire, Wisconsin 54701(715) 834-3161River Falls Office215 N. Second Street Suite 204River Falls, Wisconsin 54022(715) 426-4908Fax: (715) 426-5866NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION $0%,0 0DSOHZRRG$SDUWPHQWV0DSOHZRRG$SWVUYWMAPLEWOOD LIVING DEVELOPMENTEF MAPLEWOOD LLCMAPLEWOOD DRIVE WEST & ALVARADO DRIVE1B35(/,05(9,(:COLORED ELEVS $8*MARK DATE DESCRIPTIONSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1B1SOUTH ELEVATION (COLORED)SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"1B2WEST ELEVATION (COLORED)F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 74 of 86 6FDOH8/12/2020 9:53:06 PM2EF MAPLEWOOD LLCMAPLEWOOD LIVING DEVELOPMENTNORTH ELEV (PARKING LOT)EAST ELEV (ALONG MAPLEWOOD DR)F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 75 of 86 6FDOH8/12/2020 9:53:57 PM3EF MAPLEWOOD LLCMAPLEWOOD LIVING DEVELOPMENTCOURTYARD LOOKING NORTHCOURTYARD LOOKING EASTF1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 76 of 86 6FDOH8/12/2020 9:54:27 PM4EF MAPLEWOOD LLCMAPLEWOOD LIVING DEVELOPMENTNE CORNERF1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 77 of 86 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: Maplewood Drive at County Road C Apartments PROJECT NO: 20-24 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Assistant City Engineer DATE: 9-2-2020 PLAN SET: Engineering plans dated 8-13-2020 REPORTS: Stormwater Management Plan – Dated 5-18-2018 The applicant is seeking city approval to develop a 72 unit apartment project on roughly 9 acres of vacant land near the southwest corner of County Road C and Maplewood Drive. The applicant is requesting a review of the current design. The amount of disturbance on this site is greater than ½ acre. As such, the applicant is required to meet the City’s stormwater quality, rate control, and other stormwater management requirements. The applicant is proposing to meet these requirements via the use of an iron- enhanced filtration basin, infiltration basins, and an underground stormwater storage system. From the information submitted, it appears that the proposed design meets the City and Watershed District stormwater management requirements. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents and calculations for final review. The following are engineering review comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Drainage and Stormwater Management 1) The project shall be submitted to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) for review. All conditions of RWMWD shall be met. 2) A joint storm water maintenance agreement shall be prepared and signed by the owner for the proposed filtration basin, infiltration basins, pretreatment devices, and underground detention system. The Owner shall submit a signed copy of the joint storm- water maintenance agreement with the RWMWD to the City. 3) One of the methods being proposed to meet volume reduction requirements is iron- enhanced filtration. While the City is supportive of this method, our stormwater management standards don’t currently address iron-enhanced filtration. As such, the City will defer to the RWMWD methodology for calculating volume reduction credits generated through this method. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 78 of 86 4) The applicant shall show how the proposed trench drain near the garage entrance at the northwest corner of the building will be routed on the utility plan. The trench drain shall not be connected into the sanitary sewer system. 5) The applicant shall aim to achieve 1-foot of freeboard between the emergency overflow for the underground detention system and the high-point near the top of the garage entrance ramp. The applicant shall work with the City to meet the intent of the City’s freeboard requirements in the City’s stormwater standards. 6) The 100-year HWL shall be displayed on the plans for the infiltration basin between the proposed building and Maplewood Drive. The emergency overflow for this basin shall be identified on the plans. 7) Outlet pipes discharging into wetlands and basins shall have minimal slopes to prevent scour at the outlet areas (0.5% Typical). 8) The 100-year HWL shall be depicted on the plans for the southerly infiltration basin. 9) While this project lies within the shoreland overlay district for Kohlman Lake, the amount of impervious surface coverage falls well beneath the allowable 30% coverage allowed by ordinance. Grading and Erosion Control 10) All slopes shall be 3H:1V or flatter. 11) Inlet protection devices shall be installed on all existing and proposed onsite storm sewer until all exposed soils onsite are stabilized. This includes storm sewer on adjacent streets that could potentially receive construction related sediment or debris. 12) Adjacent streets and parking areas shall be swept as needed to keep the pavement clear of sediment and construction debris. 13) All pedestrian facilities shall be ADA compliant. 14) The total grading volume (cut/fill) shall be noted on the plans. 15) A copy of the project SWPPP and NDPES Permit shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 16) The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 79 of 86 17) All modifications to the water system shall be reviewed by Saint Paul regional Water Services. All requirements of SPRWS shall be met. 18) All new sanitary sewer service piping shall be schedule 40 PVC or SDR35. 19) The proposed bored sanitary sewer line shall be pressure tested to ensure it is completely sealed to groundwater infiltration. Other 20) The applicant shall provide a self-renewing letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of 125% of the proposed site improvements including earthwork, grading, erosion control, site vegetation establishment, aggregate base, and paving. 21) The proposed sanitary sewer service line is shown crossing onto the neighboring property. The applicant shall verify that applicable easements are in place to allow for said connection. New easements may be required. Public Works Permits The following permits are required by the Maplewood Public Works Department for this project. The applicant should verify the need for other City permits with the Building Department. 22) Right-of-way permit 23) Grading and erosion control permit 24) Storm Sewer Permit 25) Sanitary Sewer Permit - END COMMENTS - F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 80 of 86 Environmental Review Project: Maplewood Living Apartments Date of Plans: August 13, 2020 Date of Review: September 8, 2020 Location: Vacant Parcel Located West of Maplewood Drive, south of the intersection of County Road C East and Maplewood Drive Reviewers: Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner (651) 249-2304; shann.finwall@maplewoodmn.gov Background: The applicant is proposing to develop the 8.96 acre vacant parcel with a 72-unit apartment complex. The parcel is located in the Shoreland Overlay District for Kohlman Lake. There is a Manage B wetland and significant trees located on the parcel. The proposal must comply with the City’s shoreland, wetland, and tree preservation ordinances, and infiltration basin planting policies. Shoreland Overlay District: The Shoreland Overlay District for Kohlman Lake allows for 30 percent impervious surface coverage for an apartment complex. The parcel is 8.96 acres. The impervious surface area including the building, parking lot, and sidewalks will cover 1.26 acres. The overall impervious surface area encompasses 14 percent of the parcel, which meets the Shoreland Overlay District requirements. Trees: 1. Tree Preservation Ordinance: a. Significant Trees: Maplewood’s tree preservation ordinance describes a significant tree as a healthy tree as follows - hardwood tree with a minimum of 6 inches in diameter, an evergreen tree with a minimum of 8 inches in diameter, and a softwood tree with a minimum of 12 inches in diameter. b. Specimen Trees: A specimen tree is defined as a healthy tree of any species which is 28 inches in diameter or greater. c. Tree Replacement: Tree replacement is based on a calculation of significant trees located on the parcel and significant trees removed. Credits are given for all specimen trees that are preserved. 2. Tree Impacts: There are 143 significant trees equaling 1,996 diameter inches of trees on the property. The applicant is removing 35 significant trees equaling F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 81 of 86 533.5 diameter inches. Because so many trees are being preserved, the tree ordinance does not call out tree replacement for the development. The development, however, must meet the City’s landscaping and screening requirements for tree planting. 3. Tree Replacement: The applicant’s landscape plan includes 25 new trees, for a total of 50.5 caliper inches. The required screen area adjacent the single family homes, north of the parking lot, will be planted with four evergreens and three ornamental trees, in addition to shrubs and seed or sod. These plantings will be located in between existing trees that are being preserved. No trees are proposed in front of the building or in front of the south parking lot, adjacent Maplewood Drive. The tree planting meets the City’s tree replacement requirements but may not meet the City’s landscaping and screening requirements. 4. Tree Replacement Recommendations: a. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant must submit the following: 1) Landscape Plan: A revised landscape plan showing additional trees or screening north of the parking lot to meet the City’s screening requirements. Additionally, the applicant should add trees in front of the building and south parking lot, adjacent Maplewood Drive. 2) Tree Protection Plan: A tree protection plan that identifies how trees being preserved near the development will be protected per the City’s tree ordinance and standards. 3) Surety: Submit a cash escrow or letter of credit to cover the landscaping requirements. Wetland: 1. Wetland Ordinance: There is a Manage B wetland located in the center of the parcel. The City’s wetland ordinance requires a 50-foot minimum and 75-foot average wetland buffer. The wetland ordinance allows flexibility in instances where, because of the unique physical characteristics of a specific parcel of land, the averaging of buffer width for the entire parcel may be necessary to allow for the reasonable use of the land during a development or construction project. In such cases decreasing the minimum buffer width will be compensated for by increased buffer widths elsewhere in the same parcel to achieve the required average buffer width. Averaging is allowed based on an assessment of the following: a. Undue hardship would arise from not allowing the average buffer, or would otherwise not be in the public interest. b. Size of parcel. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 82 of 86 c. Configuration of existing roads and utilities. d. Percentage of parcel covered by wetland. e. Configuration of wetlands on the parcel. f. Averaging will not cause degradation of the wetland or stream. g. Averaging will ensure the protection or enhancement of portions of the buffer which are found to be the most ecologically beneficial to the wetland or stream. h. A wetland buffer mitigation plan is required for construction of development projects that will require averaging. In reviewing the mitigation plan, the city may require one or more of the following actions: 1) Reducing or avoiding the impact by limiting the degree or amount of the action, such as by using appropriate technology. 2) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the buffer. 3) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by prevention and maintenance operations during the life of the actions. 4) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute buffer land at a two-to-one ratio. 5) Monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures. 6) Where the city requires restoration or replacement of a buffer, the owner or contractor shall replant the buffer with native vegetation. A restoration plan must be approved by the city before planting. 7) Any additional conditions required by the applicable watershed district and/or the soil and water conservation district shall apply. 8) A wetland or buffer mitigation surety, such as a cash deposit or letter of credit, of 150 percent of estimated cost for mitigation. The surety will be required based on the size of the project as deemed necessary by the administrator. Funds will be held by the city until successful completion of restoration as determined by the city after a final inspection. Wetland or buffer mitigation surety does not include other sureties required pursuant to any other provision of city ordinance or city directive. 2. Wetland Impacts: The development will have grading to within 50 feet along the eastern edge of the Manage B wetland. The entire western edge of the wetland will remain undisturbed allowing for wetland buffer averaging. Wetland buffer F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 83 of 86 averaging is being requested due to the percentage of parcel covered by wetland and the configuration of the wetland on the parcel. 3. Wetland Buffer Recommendations: a. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant must submit the following: 1) Wetland Buffer Averaging Plan: A wetland buffer averaging plan identifying where the wetland buffer will be increased on the western side of the wetland to ensure mitigation of the averaged 50-foot buffer encroachment on the eastern side of the wetland. Since the development will take place along the entire eastern side of the wetland (approximately 780 feet), the required averaging on the western side should be 780 x 25 (buffer encroachment) = 19,500 square feet of preserved buffer on the western side of the wetland. 2) Utility and Grading Plans: The utility plan shows storm and sanitary sewer lines being bored under the wetland and wetland buffer. The applicant must supply detailed utility and grading plans for these areas to ensure there is no impact to the wetland and wetland buffer. 3) Wetland Buffer Mitigation: A wetland buffer mitigation plan showing repair, rehabilitation, or restoration of the 50-foot wetland buffer located on the eastern edge of the wetland. Mitigation should include removal of invasive species and planting of native plants within the buffer. 4) Landscape Plan: The landscape plan appears to add turf or seed within the 50-foot wetland buffer located on the east side of the wetland, adjacent the development. The applicant must supply a detailed landscape plan to ensure there is no impact to the wetland buffer. 5) Wetland Buffer Easement: An easement over the 50-foot wetland buffer on the eastern side of the wetland, and over the increased wetland buffer on the western side of the wetland. The easement will be recorded with the County and will identify that no mowing, grading, or building is allowed within the wetland buffer. . 4) Wetland Buffer Sign Plan: A wetland buffer sign plan showing the location of wetland buffer signs on the survey along the edge of the buffers that specify that no building, mowing, cutting, grading, filling or dumping be allowed within the buffer. 5) Wetland Buffer Sign Installation: Install the city wetland buffer signs that specify that no building, mowing, cutting, grading, filling or dumping be allowed within the buffer. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 84 of 86 6) Maintenance Agreement: Sign a wetland buffer mitigation agreement with the City requiring that the applicant establish and maintain the required mitigation within the buffer for a three-year period. 7) Surety: A cash escrow or letter of credit to cover 150 percent of the wetland buffer mitigation. The City will retain the surety for up to three years as outlined in the maintenance agreement to ensure the wetland buffer mitigation is established and maintained. Infiltration Basin: 1. Infiltration Basins Proposed: There is a large infiltration basin proposed on the south side of the parcel. 2. City Infiltration Basin Planting Requirements: Large infiltration basins will ideally be planted with deep-rooted native plants. The City requires a portion of the basin to be planted rather than seeded. Using plants rather than seeds hastens establishment and provides a better chance of successful establishment. Basin bottoms and lower elevations almost never establish successfully from seed since the seed is washed away when stormwater flows into the basin. 3. Infiltration Basin Recommendations: a. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the infiltration basin, including a list of species, container size, spacing, and quantities to be approved by City staff. b. For any area using a native seed mix provide information on maintenance for planting year and years two and three, addressing what maintenance activities will be required and what entity (developer, owner, etc.) will take on this responsibility. c. A joint stormwater maintenance agreement shall be prepared and signed by the owner for the proposed infiltration basins. The Owner shall submit a signed copy of the joint stormwater maintenance agreement with the RWMWD to the City. F1, Attachment 4 - For Sept. 20, 2022 CDRB Meeting CDRB Packet Page Number 85 of 86 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CDRB Packet Page Number 86 of 86