HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-11-10 HPC Agenda
AGENDA
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
7:00 P.M. Wednesday, November 10, 2021
MaplewoodCityHall
1830 CountyRoadB East
Maplewood,MN 55109
A.ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. October 10, 2021
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Swearing in new commission members
E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Grant Options
2. 2022 Goal Setting
F. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Maplewood Area Historical Society Update
G. ADJOURNMENT
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OUR COMMUNITY
Followingarerules ofcivility theCity ofMaplewoodexpects ofeveryoneappearingatCommissionMeetings -elected
officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard and
understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Commission meetings, it is
understood that everyone will follow these principles:
• Speak only for yourself, not for other Commission members or citizens - unless specifically tasked by your
colleagues to speak for the group or for citizens in the form of a petition.
• Show respect during comments and/or discussions, listen actively and do not interrupt or talk amongst each
other.
• Be respectful of the process, keeping order and decorum. Do not be critical of Commission members, staff or
others in public.
• Be respectful of each other’s time keeping remarks brief, to the point and non-repetitive.
AGENDA
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
HERITAGEPRESERVATIONCOMMISSION
7:00P.MThursday,October 14,2021
MaplewoodCityHall
1830CountyRoadBEast
Maplewood,MN55109
A.ROLL CALL
Vice Chair Richard CurriePresent
Commissioner Bob CardinalPresent
Commissioner M. FettPresent
Commissioner J. DeMoePresent
Commissioner John GasparPresent
Councilmember Nikki VillavicencioAbsent
Staff
Joe Sheeran, Communications MgrPresent
B.APPROVALOFAGENDA
nd
R. Currie Motion to approve, Fett 2, pass on voice vote
C.APPROVALOFMINUTESfor September 9,2021
nd
J. DeMoe Motion to approve, J. Gaspar2, pass on voice vote
D.NEWBUSINESS
1.Sheeran discussed Goal Settingfor 2022
2.Heritage Preservation Grants–B. Cardinal to appointsR. Currie to study the possibility of grant
funding. No objections.
E.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1.HeritagePreservationAward–Short discussion. B. Cardinal motions to award Janice Quick for
the 2020 award. J. DeMoeSecond, passed on voice vote.
2.HPC candidate interviews–J. Sheeran discusses the four candidates before council applying for
th
the two open HPC seats. Announcement will be made by Thursday, October 20.
F.VISITORPRESENTATIONS
1.MaplewoodAreaHistoricalSocietyUpdate–Tj Mileskee newly appointed ED introduces himself
and background
G.ADJOURNMENT
R. Currie motions to adjourn
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date November 10, 2021
Bob Cardinal, HPC Chair
REPORT TO:
Joe Sheeran, HPC Staff Liaison
REPORT FROM:
Joe Sheeran, HPC Staff Liaison
PRESENTER:
Grant Options
AGENDA ITEM:
Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing
Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation
Policy Issue:
The Heritage Preservation Commission is seeking grant options that would help fund a potential
future project. Grant options should align with 2022’s Commission goals.
Recommended Action:
Click here to enter recommendation or enter for discussion purposes only.
Fiscal Impact:
Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is TBD
Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification
New Revenue Source
Use of ReservesOther: Click here to
enter other source or n/a.
Strategic Plan Relevance:
Financial Sustainability Integrated Communication Targeted Redevelopment
Operational Effectiveness Community Inclusiveness Infrastructure & Asset
Mgmt.
Click here to enter strategic plan relevance.
Background:
The Minnesota Historical Society has three grant options the could work for the HPC:
Heritage Partnership Program, awarded annually, with a January 21 preliminary deadline
What Can Be funded:
Shared Services
Partners may individually provide similar services to the public or contract with service providers to
accomplish common goals. Streamlining services for greater efficiency will allow for a more
comprehensive public benefit. The application must thoroughly demonstrate the partners and their
customers will benefit from the shared service and that the partners can sustain the results of the shared
services beyond the grant period.
Examples
Contracting with a training provider to present skills seminars among multiple constituencies.
Developing a regional or community-based team to streamline disaster response efforts for historic
properties, public records, museum collections, or archives.
Contracting with an interpretive specialist to create integrated heritage tourism or exhibits programs.
Developing a plan to combine services for collections held among the partners, including digitization,
storage, inventory, care, and access.
Shared Resources
Partners may individually manage similar resources on behalf of the public. Streamlining management of
those resources for greater efficiency will allow for a more comprehensive public benefit. The application
must thoroughly demonstrate the partners and their customers will benefit from the compilation and
sharing of resources. The partners must be able to sustain the results of the shared resources beyond
the grant period.
Examples
Develop a regional disaster response and recovery supply cache as part of a regional disaster team
program (e.g., develop and purchase supplies for disaster kits).
Plan, develop, and implement digital solutions for uniting historic resources to promote better public
and student access to Minnesota history.
Developing cooperative agreements and procedures to manage historic properties, public records,
museum collections, or archives.
Standardizing resources among partners, such as business forms, fee schedules, etc.
OTHER GRANT OPPORTUNITIES:
General Small Grants (<$10K) on a quarterly basis. (Applications are due on the second Friday of
January, April, July, and October. These grants primarily fund projects that can be completed within 12
months.
st
Large Grants (>$10K) annually, January 21deadline
What Can Be Funded:
Oral History
Grants in this category are intended to assist with recording, transcribing, and preserving oral history
interviews—focused conversations between a trained interviewer and one or more narrators, capturing
information about historical events that can be preserved and made broadly accessible.
Eligibleprojectsincludebutarenotlimitedto:
Outreach to recent immigrants
Military experiences of community members
Local controversies
Business developments
Natural disasters
Community life
Civic accomplishments
Work for the public good
Language preservation
Example Oral History Application
Research and Writing
Grants in this category provide funding to conduct the research necessary for historical discovery and
interpretation. Solid research is the basis for communicating history accurately, fairly, and honestly to the
public. A number of grant project categories require the research to be completed before the
implementation phase of the project. Interpretive Programs and Public Education, Heritage Tourism,
Publications, and Historic Preservation pre-development and development projects need research to be
substantially completed and vetted before applying for the implementation phase. For Historic
Preservation projects, see guidelines for HP research and writing.
Interpretive Programs and Public Education
Interpretation and public education grants make Minnesota history accessible through a variety of
mediums, including technology. They are the cornerstones in building awareness and documenting
Minnesota history for the benefit of future generations. Interpretive Programs & Public Education
projects often have two phases—research and implementation. Research projects should begin in the
Research category.
Interpretation is the meaningful communication of a story that adds context to historical chronologies and
objects. It is distinguished from research in that research attempts to gather all relevant information, and
interpretation is a public representation of a portion of the results of research. This is necessary to
ensure that what is communicated to the public is fair, honest, accurate, and accessible. By dividing an
interpretive initiative into two phases—research and implementation—the project can be evaluated by
independent-but-knowledgeable reviewers. For additional information, consult the Research category.
Eligible projects include but are not limited to:
Exhibits:
Interpretive exhibits telling compelling stories from the community
Vignettes (e.g., a historical family room)
Local collections (local art, dolls, etc.)
Films:
Writing and editing the script
Production and post-production
Distribution
Historical markers:
Single markers or marker systems in a variety of materials. More than simple labels, markers
must communicate a story
Public Education:
Hosting or planning a new Minnesota history–based conference, program, or workshop
Public education kit/curriculum for a community, school, or organization
Web Development:
Website and/or web capabilities to enhance Minnesota history
Online indexes/databases of government records, city directories, cemetery records, etc.
Mobile/web apps
Interactive Technology:
Kiosks/touch screens
Augmented reality technology
Game-based learning development
Heritage Tourism:
Heritage Tourism plans
Wayfinding for historic resources
Signage program for a historic district
Walking and mobile tours, docent training, and related podcast
Geocaching
Alternate formats:
Make your existing interpretive programs ADA compliant by providing content through multiple
sensory channels
Publications
Publication of research increases accessibility to the information and makes accessible the information
uncovered by research. Grants in this category are intended to assist the publication of research in
books, articles, guides, and related forms. Web-based publications, as well as certain types of
presentations of findings, also fall into this category.
For all projects where history will be communicated to the public, applications must provide two
reassurances to reviewers. First, all applications for publications must include an assurance that the
publication will carry the standard disclaimer:
This publication was made possible in part by the people of Minnesota through a grant funded by an
appropriation to the Minnesota Historical Society from the Minnesota Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund. Any
views, findings, opinions, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the
authors and do not necessarily represent those of the State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Historical
Society, or the Minnesota Historic Resources Advisory Committee.
Second, the application must provide two thoughtful analyses of the historical quality of the proposed
work. These critical reviews are not letters of support that merely endorse publication, but rather
statements evaluating (not simply asserting) the interpretation contained in the work for fairness,
honesty, and accuracy. The responsibility for having draft manuscripts evaluated rests on the applicant
and publication proposals lacking two reviews will be considered incomplete.
Eligible projects include but are not limited to:
books
articles
general histories
historic site guides
Collections Care and Management
This category supports projects that develop, store, and/or preserve objects for public access in
museum and historic house collections. Many historical organizations also preserve and interpret state
and local history through the collection of archival and library materials, such as manuscripts,
government records, moving images, photographs, and sound recordings; those projects fall under this
category as well. Eligible organizations pursuing history projects that organize, develop, and conserve
objects, archives, and related materials should look at this category.
Eligibleprojectsincludebutarenotlimitedto:
Establishing an archive
Archives collection development, including documentation strategies, surveys of archival materials
not currently in repositories, appraisal projects, reappraisal, documentation of groups or subject
areas underrepresented in your collection, fieldwork, and other collecting activities
Processing collections
Collections inventory and cataloging
Creating MARC records
Creating EAD finding aids
Developing a records management program
Archives policy development
Purchase and/or installation of Collections Management Software or Archives Management
Software
Purchase and/or installation of Digital Asset Management Software relating to collections Migration
of collections data
Projects addressing new and evolving media such as born-digital records and photographs,
databases, and social media
Archaeological Collections Assessment
For more details about eligible projects, visit:
https://www.mnhs.org/preservation/legacy-grants/funded-projects
For more details about grants, visit: https://www.mnhs.org/preservation/legacy-grants
Attachments:
None