HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-06-28 City Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
MANAGER WORKSHOP
5:30P.M. Monday, June 28, 2021
Held Remotely Via Conference Call
Dial 1-312-626-6799 or 1-888-788-0099
When Prompted Enter Meeting ID:993 7832 7878#
No Participant ID, Enter # When Prompted
A.CALL TO ORDER
B.ROLL CALL
C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
D.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
E.NEW BUSINESS
1.2022-2026 Capital Improvement Plan Review
2.Highway 36 Transit Feasibility Study
F.ADJOURNMENT
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OUR COMMUNITY
Following are rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected
officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard
and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is
understood that everyone will follow these principles:
Speak only for yourself, not for other council members or citizens - unless specifically tasked by your colleagues
to speak for the group or for citizens in the form of a petition.
Show respect during comments and/or discussions, listen actively and do not interrupt or talk amongst each
other.
Be respectful of the process, keeping order and decorum. Do not be critical of council members, staff or others
in public.
Be respectful of each other’s time keeping remarks brief, to the point and non-repetitive.
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
E1
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date June 28, 2021
REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman
REPORT FROM: Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director
PRESENTER:
Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director
AGENDA ITEM: Capital Improvement Plan Review
Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing
Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation
Policy Issue:
The annual Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) coordinates the planning, financing and timing of major
equipment purchases and construction projects. The Council will consider the adoption of the CIP
with the 2022 budget in December. Adopting the CIP does not constitute appropriation of the
projects. The CIP is available on the CityÓs transparency portal and we will preview that tonight.
Recommended Action:
No action required. This item is for discussion. Council members should consider how they wish to
prioritize planned projects and determine which projects to appropriate for the 2022 budget year.
All projects are included in the attached project listing.
Fiscal Impact:
Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is N/A
Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source
Use of Reserves Other: N/A
Strategic Plan Relevance:
Financial SustainabilityIntegrated CommunicationTargeted Redevelopment
Operational EffectivenessCommunity InclusivenessInfrastructure & Asset Mgmt.
An analysis of projected debt is included in the attachment, indicating the CityÓs ability to
accomplish the recommended projects within the framework of the CityÓs existing debt policy.
Background
The Planning Commission will review the plan and a hold a public hearing at the Planning
Commission meeting on July 20 at 7:00 PM. The CIP will be available on the CityÓs webpage.
Attachments
1.Project list
2.PowerPoint
Workshop Packet Page Number 1 of 53
E1, Attachment 1
000 0 00 0 00000000 0 00000000000 0 000
84,00042,00050,000
65,00095,50085,00032,00096,00080,00055,00045,000
120,00160,00200,00214,00825,00500,00500,00176,30
400,00 957,50 840,00450,00300,00244,00300,00640,00350,00500,00300,00150,00300,00150,00
2,000,001,250,001,000,001,000,003,750,008,480,00
2,200,004,825,005,440,00
0000
000
90,00025,000
200,00 200,00 244,00 334,00 130,00 155,00
8,480,00
000000000
0000
90,00025,000
200,00 200,00 287,00300,00 677,00 130,00150,00100,00150,00
20252026Total
1,000,00
1,000,00
1,000,001,555,00
00000000
0000
4
90,00042,00025,000
160,00 160,00 100,00 100,00 282,00825,00130,00250,00500,00 905,00 176,30
1,239,00
000000
0000
90,00096,00084,00050,000
120,00 120,00 214,00 484,00 130,00250,00
1,000,001,000,00
1,000,001,430,00
0000000000
0000
25,000
120,00500,00300,00
277,50100,00
2,091,001,395,00
2026
00000
#20222023202
Y
00
2022
4
Project
PLAN
MT16.01MT18.0265,000MT21.0195,500MT21.0PW22.05PW22.0632,000CD02.01100,00FD21.0790,000PR18.2280,000PR21.02PR21.03PW18.23PW18.31PW19.0455,000PW21.0145,000PW22.07300,00PM07.01PM08.06PM11.02PM14.02PM16.0
05PM18.01200,00PM18.03250,00PM19.01PM19.01PW22.013,750,00PW22.03
CATEGOR
BY
e FundFD21.01FundFD21.01FundFD21.031,250,00
AidPW21.20
IncCD15.01AbatePM11.02AbatePM16.001
Sourc
EquipEquipEquip
FundMT21.0385,000
FundFD19.01FundFD21.011271,00
TaxTaxTax
State
FundFundFundFundFund
Fund
CountyPM16.005
IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS
SafetySafetySafety
FundFundFundFundFundFundFundFund
Capital
Funding
BondsBondsBondsFundFundFundFundFundFundFund
Fund
FundFund
FundFund
BuildingEDAG.O.AmbulancePublicPublicFleetFleetFleetG.O.G.O.ParkParkParkParkWatershed
BuildingBuildingBuildingBuildingCIPFleetParkParkParkRamsey
s
CAPITAL
Upgrade
MachinesFleet
MachineFleet
ParksCIP
Station
Maint
ReplacementBuilding
MachinesFleet
MachineFleet
Radios
ReplacementMCC
ImprovementsMunicipal
Lift
GearImprovementsEUF
Park
ReplacementPublic
Roof
Item
Upgrades
Paving
ReplacementAmbulanceExisting
Mhz
Work
SpaceSpace
ImprovementsEUF
Out
Street
545
Area
to
Improvements
Sewer
SiteReplacement
800
CD
Maintenance
Improvements
U#
Replacement
GeneratorParkPark
Turn
OpenOpen
Redevelopment
Facility
LoaderLoader
Steer
Street
ReplacementMaintenanceParkPark
Toolcat
Program
Park
Monitors
andParkRoadRoad
Center
Truck
Sweeper
WorksSafety
Shelters
Space
EndEnd
Ave
A/CSanitary
Skid
MaintenanceUpgradesReinvestment
730
Park
CreekCreek
Engine/Tanker
Lighting
653654
Municipal1902LEDEmergencyPublicPark1830
DevHousingDevGladstone
t
ImprovementsCopeImprovementsCountyImprovementsCounty
ImprovementsParkImprovementsGoodrichImprovementsParkImprovementsOpenImprovementsGoodrichImprovementsHarvestImprovementsFishImprovementsNatureImprovementsPicnicImprovementsHazelwoodImprovementsFishImp
rovementsHazelwood
s
Development
EquipmentCardiacEquipmentAmbulanceEquipmentPublicEquipmentFirefighterEquipmentFireEquipmentLadder
Developmen
DevEconomicDevEconomic
Improvements
t
BuildingsCommunityEquipmentPark
Improvement
WorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksEquipmentTwoWorksEquipmentU#WorksEquipmentU#WorksEquipmentFrontWorksEquipmentStreetWorksEquipmen
tT650WorksEquipmentUnitWorksEquipmentFrontWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreet
Improvements
DepartmentCategory
TotalTotalTotalTotal
Buildings PublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublic Community CommunityCommunity Equipmen FireFireFireFireFireFirePublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublic Park ParksParkParksParkParksParkPar
ksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksPark Street PublicPublicPublic
Workshop Packet Page Number 2 of 53
E1, Attachment 1
0000000000000 0 000000 0
85,00045,00026,00055,00025,00070,00080,00025,00054,000
90,00015,00093,000
230,00240,00245,00
645,571470,00602,50329,50100,00 429,50 160,00250,00
6,950,004,230,001,930,004,410,003,940,005,970,002,480,001,890,003,640,351,375,00
3,163,00
49,564,72166,579,721
0 0 000 0
00
20,00093,000
110,00 130,00 275,00250,00 618,00
2,480,00
10,960,0012,397,00
000000 0
00
20,000 20,000 54,000
470,00602,50275,00160,00 489,00
20252026Total
5,970,001,890,00
8,932,50
12,873,50
000000 0
000
4
20,00025,000
110,00 130,00 275,00240,00245,00 785,00
6,950,001,930,00 9,056,30
12,375,30
0000
0
20,000 20,000 85,00045,00026,00015,00070,00080,00025,000
323,921275,00230,00 851,00
3,940,003,640,35
7,904,271
11,809,271
000 0 00 0
00
275,00 420,00
129,50
12,711,6517,124,65
#20222023202
0
Project
PW20.08PW18.024,230,00PW18.07PW21.10321,65PW18.014,410,00PW22.02PW19.09PW22.04PW18.09PW18.05PW14.01109,50PW03.2120,000PW17.04PW18.13PW18.14PW18.15PW18.1655,000PW18.17PW18.1890,000PW18.19PW18.21PW18.2
4PW18.25PW18.29PW18.30PW19.02PW19.03PW21.04
e FundFD21.06FundPD21.01
AidPW16.06AidPW21.21
Sourc
EquipEquip
StateState
Fund
SafetySafety
FundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFund
Funding
FundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFund
Fund
EUFMunicipalEUFSewerPublicPublicFleet
EUFFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleet
ImpMunicipal
TruckFleet
PavementEUF
TrucksFleet
Ave
PavementEUF
Area
Ton
ReplacementSRF
ImprovementsEUF
TruckTruckDump
Area
ImprovementsEUF
RehabilitationEUF
Truck
PavementTruckVanTrailer
ImprovementsEUF
Half
TonTonTon
Item
Signal
Area
TruckTruckTruckTruck
Street
Sign
ImprovementsEUF
TonTon
Area
HalfHalfHalf
Pavement
Dr/CypressStreet
Replacement
U#531
Ave/Larpenteur
Upgrades
PlowPlowPlowPlow
Drive
Road
Pavement
Capacity
Traffic
Utility
TruckTruckTruck
OneOneOne
Area
and
Lb
Replacement
Bear
QuarterQuarter
AxleAxleAxleAxle
Leg
Truck
Truck
Cleaning/Dredging
Ton
TonTonTon
ShoreStreetandandand
Station
611
PondLiftGrassSquadSingleThreeHalfSingleOneThreeHalf10,000SingleCCTVOneSingleOneOneHalfU#
PLAN
ImprovementsEastImprovementsGervaisImprovementsMaplewoodImprovementsMcKnightImprovementsMcMenemyImprovementsMyrtle/SterlingImprovementsProsperityImprovementsRiceImprovementsSouthImprovementsWalter/Be
amImprovementsWhiteImprovementsWoodlynn/Southlawn
Vehicles
IMPROVEMENT
Improvements
CAPITAL
StreetUtilities
WorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksUtilitiesWorksUtilitiesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehicles
WorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehicles
Vehicles
DepartmentCategory
TotalTotal
PublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublic Utilities PublicPublic Vehicles FirePoliceVehiclesPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPubl
icPublicPublicPublic TotalTOTAL
Workshop Packet Page Number 3 of 53
E1, Attachment 2
1
2
0
Debt
2
,
8
2
e
n
u
J
Workshop Packet Page Number 4 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 5 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 6 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 7 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 8 of 53
s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m
I
t
e
e
r
t
S
d
n
a
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
e
R
t
b
e
D
Workshop Packet Page Number 9 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 10 of 53
Does not authorize expendituresCouncil must authorize each item prior to spending
Workshop Packet Page Number 11 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 12 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 13 of 53
t
b
e
D
w
e
N
l
a
t
o
T
6
5
5
,
7
1
8
,
1
2
$
Workshop Packet Page Number 14 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 15 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 16 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 17 of 53
e
k
a
t
l
l
i
w
d
a
o
r
y
n
a
,
g
n
i
o
g
e
r
Ô
u
o
y
e
r
e
l
l
o
h
r
r
w
a
C
s
w
i
w
o
e
n
L
k
.
t
Ô
É
n
e
r
o
e
d
h
t
u
o
u
y
o
f
Iy
Workshop Packet Page Number 18 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 19 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 20 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 21 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 22 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 23 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 24 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 25 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 26 of 53
Workshop Packet Page Number 27 of 53
E2
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOPSTAFF REPORT
Meeting Date June 28, 2021
REPORT TO:
Melinda Coleman, City Manager
REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director
PRESENTER:
Jeff Thomson, Community Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: Highway 36 Transit Feasibility Study
Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing
Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation
Policy Issue:
The City of Maplewood has been partnering in a high-level planning study led by Washington
County in collaboration with other cities along Highway 36, Ramsey County, Hennepin County,
Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Council. The study has lasted
approximately one year, during which time corridor communities, operational agencies, local
businesses and community stakeholders, and the public were afforded a chance to help establish a
common vision, develop priorities, and identify the necessary steps for implementation.
Project staff from Washington County will be attending the city council workshop on June 28 to
provide an update on this project.
Recommended Action:
No action required.
Fiscal Impact:
Is There a Fiscal Impact?NoYes, the true or estimated cost is $0.
Financing source(s):Adopted BudgetBudget ModificationNew Revenue Source
Use of Reserves Other: N/A
Strategic Plan Relevance:
Financial SustainabilityIntegrated CommunicationTargeted Redevelopment
Operational EffectivenessCommunity InclusivenessInfrastructure & Asset Mgmt.
The city supports regional transit projects that connect Maplewood to the region. Both the Gold Line
and Rush Line transit projects originated from feasibility studies like the one discussed within this
report.
Workshop Packet Page Number 28 of 53
E2
Background
The Highway 36 Transit Feasibility Study is looking at the potential for transit improvements in the
Highway 36 corridor, which extends about 27 miles between the Saint Croix Valley area and
downtown Minneapolis – running through Maplewood. Previous transit and highway studies have
consistently shown that Highway 36 is a critical connection between the east metro and other parts
of the Twin Cities.
The study is also working to:
Identify transit service needs and recommendations that are reflective of the Highway 36
corridor’s existing and anticipated future travel demands and patterns.
Consider transit and complementary facilities to improve travel options and provide viable
alternatives to highway congestion for Washington, Ramsey, and Hennepin county residents,
businesses, and visitors.
Attachments
1. Presentation
Workshop Packet Page Number 29 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
l
i
c
n
u
o
C
y
t
i
C
d
o
o
w
e
l
p
a
M Study Presentation 6/28/2021Emily Jorgensen, Project ManagerJoe Ayers-Johnson, Asst. Project Manager
Workshop Packet Page Number 30 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
n
o
i
t
a
t
n
e
s
e
r
Study Background & Scope Study Goals Public Engagement SummaryTransit Scenarios RecommendationsNext Steps
P
1.2.3.4.5.6.
Workshop Packet Page Number 31 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
l
a
o
G
&
e
p
o
c
S
y
d
u
t
S
Workshop Packet Page Number 32 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
?
y
d
u
t
S
t
i
s
n
a
r
T
6
3
y
a
w
h
g
i
H
e
h
t
s
i
t
a
h
W
:
e
p
o
c
S
y
d
u
t
Identify transit service needs and recommendations that are reflective of the Highway 36 ĭƚƩƩźķƚƩƭ ĻǣźƭƷźƓŭ ğƓķ ğƓƷźĭźƦğƷĻķ ŅǒƷǒƩĻ ƷƩğǝĻƌ ķĻƒğƓķƭ ğƓķ ƦğƷƷĻƩƓƭConsider transit and complementary
facilities to improve travel options and provide alternatives to highway congestion for Washington, Ramsey, and Hennepin County residents, businesses, and visitors
S
The purpose of this study is to:¤¤
Workshop Packet Page Number 33 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
?
d
Operations
e
v
Working Group
l
Technical Advisory
o
v
n
i
s
i
o
h
W
:
Project Management Team
e
Group
p
o
c
City Technical
S
Advisory Working
y
d
u
t
S
Workshop Packet Page Number 34 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
l
a
o
G
y
d
u
t
S
Workshop Packet Page Number 35 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
y
r
a
m
m
u
S
t
n
e
m
e
g
a
g
n
E
c
i
l
b
u
P
Workshop Packet Page Number 36 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
for people who rely on
y
r
a
of traveling without car in this corridor
m
from people living, working, or
m
improving mobility
u greater Stillwater area
tions in the Highway 36 corridor
S
t
n
e
interested in taking transit
m
e
g
a
improving the convenience
g
n
E
of respondents are
c
i
l
73%Traffic congestion on Highway 36,transit, andwere of most importance to respondentsDemand to get around within the
b
u
Conducted focus groups with businesses, governmental agencies, medical providers, and organizaCollected over 1,200 questionnaires going to school in the Highway 36 corridor
P
Workshop Packet Page Number 37 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
o
i
r
a
n
e
c
S
t
i
s
n
a
r
T
Workshop Packet Page Number 38 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
n
o
i
t
i
n
i
f
e
D
t
i
s
n
a
r
T
:
s
All day bi-directional serviceMixed trafficor bus lanesInfrequent and high amenity stationsTypical park-and-rideservicePeak traffic periodsMixed traffic or bus lanesSimilarto regular
route bus1-2 miles between stopsFlexible stop spacingLow amenity stopsUbermeets Metro MobilityCar or van Specific geographic service areaFirstmile/last mile ordoor-to-door service
o
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
i
r
a
n
e
c
S
t
i
s
n
Express Bus
a
Local Express Bus
Demand Public Transit
r
-
T Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
ΛƦƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ ĭğƌƌĻķͻ\[źƒźƷĻķ {ƷƚƦͼΜ
On
Workshop Packet Page Number 39 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
t
i
s
n
a
r
T
c
i
l
b
u
P
d
n
a
m
e
D
Door-to-door service or first mile/last mileNo formal route, responds to daily demandOn-demand, reservations not requiredNo price surges
-
¤¤¤¤
n
not sustainable
A solution for areas that need transit but fixed-route isSpecific geographic service area Request ride via app, website, phone callShared ride is sent to pick up riderAll vehicles are
ADA compliant
O
ͻ5źğƌΏğΏwźķĻ ƒĻĻƷƭ
ĬĻƩΉ\[ǤŅƷͼHow does it work?
Workshop Packet Page Number 40 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
i
l
o
p
a
e
n
n
i
M
o
t
t
S
:
s
e
o
c
i
i
r
R
a
-
n
e
1
c
o
S
i
r
t
i
a
s
n
n
e
a
c
r
TS
Workshop Packet Page Number 41 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
i
l
o
p
a
e
n
n
i
M
o
t
l
l
a
M
d
o
o
w
e
:
l
s
p
o
i
a
r
a
M
-
n
e
2
c
o
S
i
r
t
i
a
s
n
n
e
a
c
r
TS
Workshop Packet Page Number 42 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
i
l
o
p
a
e
n
n
i
M
o
t
e
v
A
y
e
:
l
s
d
o
i
a
r
H
a
-
n
e
3
c
o
S
i
r
t
i
a
s
n
n
e
a
c
r
TS
Workshop Packet Page Number 43 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
i
l
o
p
a
e
n
n
i
M
o
t
r
e
t
a
:
w
s
l
l
o
i
i
t
r
S
a
-
n
e
4
c
o
S
i
r
t
i
a
s
n
n
e
a
c
r
TS
Workshop Packet Page Number 44 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
$17M
$80-110M
Scenario
Stillwater
$15M
Scenario
$80-105M
Hadley Ave
n
o
i
t
a
$16M
$75-100M
Scenario
u
l
a
Maplewood Mall
v
E
d
e
s
a
$13M
Rice St
Scenario
B
o
i
r
a
n
e
c
S
(2030)
Measure
Evaluation
Operations &
Maintenance Cost
Capital Cost (2030)$80-105M
(Average Weekday)3,500-4,6003,700-5,3003,000-4,3002,600-3,800
Estimated Ridership
Workshop Packet Page Number 45 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
feasible
y
feasible
t
i
l
i
feasible
b
i
s
a
e
F
&
n
preferred scenario for the corridor
o
i
t
e Hwy 36 corridor is
a
u
l
a
v
E
o
i
r
a
n
e
c
Transitway investment in the Hwy 36 corridor is Bus Rapid Transit in thTransitway investment along Hwy 36 to Stillwater is So, which scenario is the best? Next step is to identify the
S The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility of transit improvements on Highway 36 between Minneapolis and Stillwater. The evaluation shows:
Workshop Packet Page Number 46 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
n
o
i
t
a
d
n
e
m
m
o
c
e
R
y
d
u
t
S
Workshop Packet Page Number 47 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
s
e
g
n
e
l
l
a
h
C
d
n
a
t
x
e
t
n
o
C
g
n
i
t
s
Financial challenges and constraintsUncertain changes to transit marketCompeting transit priorities for our county partnersFinancial constraintsCompeting transit priorities
i
x
COVID-19 PandemicCounty ParticipationMetropolitan Council/Metro Transit Participation
E
Workshop Packet Page Number 48 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
m
r
e
T
r
a
e
N
:
s
n
o
and invest in mobility management
i
t
a
d
n
e
m
m
o
c
e
R
y
d
u
t
Study and consider pilot on-demand public transit serviceContinue to prioritize, maintain,
S 0-2 Years: Focus on Washington County
Workshop Packet Page Number 49 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
m
r
e
t
-
d
i
M
:
s
n
o
i
to report to the corridor commission
t
a
d
n
e
m
m
o
c
e
R
y
d
Identify funding sourcesDevelop multijurisdictional agreementScope out future studies and projects (transit service and infrastructure, including mobility management)
u
¤¤¤
t
Work with Metro Transit and St. Croix County on monitoring need for peak period express bus service
Form a corridor commission to:
S
3-5 Years: Form Hwy 36 Corridor Commission¤
Workshop Packet Page Number 50 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
m
r
e
T
r
e
g
n
o
L
:
s
n
o
i
rridor commission to develop and
t
s in the Highway 36 corridor for
a
d
n
e
m
m
o
c
e
R
y
d
u
t
Develop a plan for mobility hubadoption by the commissionPartner with cities to develop small area plans for transit access areas along the corridorPartner with MnDOT and the coadopt
transit advantages plan for Highway 36 and Highway 280
S
5-8 Years: Develop Corridor Plans & Partnerships
Workshop Packet Page Number 51 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
g
n
i
o
g
n
O
:
s
n
to plan and construct bicycle and
o
i
t
a
d
n
e
m
m
o
c
e
R
y
d
u
t
Partner with the cities and MnDOT pedestrian infrastructure, including applying for funding opportunitiesContinue engagement efforts throughout future transit projects in the corridor
S Ongoing: Continue engagement & collaboration
Workshop Packet Page Number 52 of 53
E2, Attachment 1
m
o
?
c
.
s
:
t
i
e
n
t
s
i
s
n
o
b
i
a
e
r
t
T
W
s
t
6
c
e
3
e
j
y
u
o
a
r
P
Q
w
h
g
i
H
Workshop Packet Page Number 53 of 53