Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-06-28 City Council Workshop Packet AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL MANAGER WORKSHOP 5:30P.M. Monday, June 28, 2021 Held Remotely Via Conference Call Dial 1-312-626-6799 or 1-888-788-0099 When Prompted Enter Meeting ID:993 7832 7878# No Participant ID, Enter # When Prompted A.CALL TO ORDER B.ROLL CALL C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA D.UNFINISHED BUSINESS None E.NEW BUSINESS 1.2022-2026 Capital Improvement Plan Review 2.Highway 36 Transit Feasibility Study F.ADJOURNMENT RULES OF CIVILITY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OUR COMMUNITY Following are rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Speak only for yourself, not for other council members or citizens - unless specifically tasked by your colleagues to speak for the group or for citizens in the form of a petition. Show respect during comments and/or discussions, listen actively and do not interrupt or talk amongst each other. Be respectful of the process, keeping order and decorum. Do not be critical of council members, staff or others in public. Be respectful of each other’s time keeping remarks brief, to the point and non-repetitive. THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK E1 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT Meeting Date June 28, 2021 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman REPORT FROM: Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director PRESENTER: Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director AGENDA ITEM: Capital Improvement Plan Review Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The annual Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) coordinates the planning, financing and timing of major equipment purchases and construction projects. The Council will consider the adoption of the CIP with the 2022 budget in December. Adopting the CIP does not constitute appropriation of the projects. The CIP is available on the CityÓs transparency portal and we will preview that tonight. Recommended Action: No action required. This item is for discussion. Council members should consider how they wish to prioritize planned projects and determine which projects to appropriate for the 2022 budget year. All projects are included in the attached project listing. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is N/A Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Financial SustainabilityIntegrated CommunicationTargeted Redevelopment Operational EffectivenessCommunity InclusivenessInfrastructure & Asset Mgmt. An analysis of projected debt is included in the attachment, indicating the CityÓs ability to accomplish the recommended projects within the framework of the CityÓs existing debt policy. Background The Planning Commission will review the plan and a hold a public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting on July 20 at 7:00 PM. The CIP will be available on the CityÓs webpage. Attachments 1.Project list 2.PowerPoint Workshop Packet Page Number 1 of 53 E1, Attachment 1 000 0 00 0 00000000 0 00000000000 0 000 84,00042,00050,000 65,00095,50085,00032,00096,00080,00055,00045,000 120,00160,00200,00214,00825,00500,00500,00176,30 400,00 957,50 840,00450,00300,00244,00300,00640,00350,00500,00300,00150,00300,00150,00 2,000,001,250,001,000,001,000,003,750,008,480,00 2,200,004,825,005,440,00 0000 000 90,00025,000 200,00 200,00 244,00 334,00 130,00 155,00 8,480,00 000000000 0000 90,00025,000 200,00 200,00 287,00300,00 677,00 130,00150,00100,00150,00 20252026Total 1,000,00 1,000,00 1,000,001,555,00 00000000 0000 4 90,00042,00025,000 160,00 160,00 100,00 100,00 282,00825,00130,00250,00500,00 905,00 176,30 1,239,00 000000 0000 90,00096,00084,00050,000 120,00 120,00 214,00 484,00 130,00250,00 1,000,001,000,00 1,000,001,430,00 0000000000 0000 25,000 120,00500,00300,00 277,50100,00 2,091,001,395,00 2026 00000 #20222023202 Y 00 2022 4 Project PLAN MT16.01MT18.0265,000MT21.0195,500MT21.0PW22.05PW22.0632,000CD02.01100,00FD21.0790,000PR18.2280,000PR21.02PR21.03PW18.23PW18.31PW19.0455,000PW21.0145,000PW22.07300,00PM07.01PM08.06PM11.02PM14.02PM16.0 05PM18.01200,00PM18.03250,00PM19.01PM19.01PW22.013,750,00PW22.03 CATEGOR BY e FundFD21.01FundFD21.01FundFD21.031,250,00 AidPW21.20 IncCD15.01AbatePM11.02AbatePM16.001 Sourc EquipEquipEquip FundMT21.0385,000 FundFD19.01FundFD21.011271,00 TaxTaxTax State FundFundFundFundFund Fund CountyPM16.005 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SafetySafetySafety FundFundFundFundFundFundFundFund Capital Funding BondsBondsBondsFundFundFundFundFundFundFund Fund FundFund FundFund BuildingEDAG.O.AmbulancePublicPublicFleetFleetFleetG.O.G.O.ParkParkParkParkWatershed BuildingBuildingBuildingBuildingCIPFleetParkParkParkRamsey s CAPITAL Upgrade MachinesFleet MachineFleet ParksCIP Station Maint ReplacementBuilding MachinesFleet MachineFleet Radios ReplacementMCC ImprovementsMunicipal Lift GearImprovementsEUF Park ReplacementPublic Roof Item Upgrades Paving ReplacementAmbulanceExisting Mhz Work SpaceSpace ImprovementsEUF Out Street 545 Area to Improvements Sewer SiteReplacement 800 CD Maintenance Improvements U# Replacement GeneratorParkPark Turn OpenOpen Redevelopment Facility LoaderLoader Steer Street ReplacementMaintenanceParkPark Toolcat Program Park Monitors andParkRoadRoad Center Truck Sweeper WorksSafety Shelters Space EndEnd Ave A/CSanitary Skid MaintenanceUpgradesReinvestment 730 Park CreekCreek Engine/Tanker Lighting 653654 Municipal1902LEDEmergencyPublicPark1830 DevHousingDevGladstone t ImprovementsCopeImprovementsCountyImprovementsCounty ImprovementsParkImprovementsGoodrichImprovementsParkImprovementsOpenImprovementsGoodrichImprovementsHarvestImprovementsFishImprovementsNatureImprovementsPicnicImprovementsHazelwoodImprovementsFishImp rovementsHazelwood s Development EquipmentCardiacEquipmentAmbulanceEquipmentPublicEquipmentFirefighterEquipmentFireEquipmentLadder Developmen DevEconomicDevEconomic Improvements t BuildingsCommunityEquipmentPark Improvement WorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksBuildingsWorksEquipmentTwoWorksEquipmentU#WorksEquipmentU#WorksEquipmentFrontWorksEquipmentStreetWorksEquipmen tT650WorksEquipmentUnitWorksEquipmentFrontWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreet Improvements DepartmentCategory TotalTotalTotalTotal Buildings PublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublic Community CommunityCommunity Equipmen FireFireFireFireFireFirePublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublic Park ParksParkParksParkParksParkPar ksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksParkParksPark Street PublicPublicPublic Workshop Packet Page Number 2 of 53 E1, Attachment 1 0000000000000 0 000000 0 85,00045,00026,00055,00025,00070,00080,00025,00054,000 90,00015,00093,000 230,00240,00245,00 645,571470,00602,50329,50100,00 429,50 160,00250,00 6,950,004,230,001,930,004,410,003,940,005,970,002,480,001,890,003,640,351,375,00 3,163,00 49,564,72166,579,721 0 0 000 0 00 20,00093,000 110,00 130,00 275,00250,00 618,00 2,480,00 10,960,0012,397,00 000000 0 00 20,000 20,000 54,000 470,00602,50275,00160,00 489,00 20252026Total 5,970,001,890,00 8,932,50 12,873,50 000000 0 000 4 20,00025,000 110,00 130,00 275,00240,00245,00 785,00 6,950,001,930,00 9,056,30 12,375,30 0000 0 20,000 20,000 85,00045,00026,00015,00070,00080,00025,000 323,921275,00230,00 851,00 3,940,003,640,35 7,904,271 11,809,271 000 0 00 0 00 275,00 420,00 129,50 12,711,6517,124,65 #20222023202 0 Project PW20.08PW18.024,230,00PW18.07PW21.10321,65PW18.014,410,00PW22.02PW19.09PW22.04PW18.09PW18.05PW14.01109,50PW03.2120,000PW17.04PW18.13PW18.14PW18.15PW18.1655,000PW18.17PW18.1890,000PW18.19PW18.21PW18.2 4PW18.25PW18.29PW18.30PW19.02PW19.03PW21.04 e FundFD21.06FundPD21.01 AidPW16.06AidPW21.21 Sourc EquipEquip StateState Fund SafetySafety FundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFund Funding FundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFundFund Fund EUFMunicipalEUFSewerPublicPublicFleet EUFFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleetFleet ImpMunicipal TruckFleet PavementEUF TrucksFleet Ave PavementEUF Area Ton ReplacementSRF ImprovementsEUF TruckTruckDump Area ImprovementsEUF RehabilitationEUF Truck PavementTruckVanTrailer ImprovementsEUF Half TonTonTon Item Signal Area TruckTruckTruckTruck Street Sign ImprovementsEUF TonTon Area HalfHalfHalf Pavement Dr/CypressStreet Replacement U#531 Ave/Larpenteur Upgrades PlowPlowPlowPlow Drive Road Pavement Capacity Traffic Utility TruckTruckTruck OneOneOne Area and Lb Replacement Bear QuarterQuarter AxleAxleAxleAxle Leg Truck Truck Cleaning/Dredging Ton TonTonTon ShoreStreetandandand Station 611 PondLiftGrassSquadSingleThreeHalfSingleOneThreeHalf10,000SingleCCTVOneSingleOneOneHalfU# PLAN ImprovementsEastImprovementsGervaisImprovementsMaplewoodImprovementsMcKnightImprovementsMcMenemyImprovementsMyrtle/SterlingImprovementsProsperityImprovementsRiceImprovementsSouthImprovementsWalter/Be amImprovementsWhiteImprovementsWoodlynn/Southlawn Vehicles IMPROVEMENT Improvements CAPITAL StreetUtilities WorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksStreetWorksUtilitiesWorksUtilitiesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehicles WorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehiclesWorksVehicles Vehicles DepartmentCategory TotalTotal PublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublic Utilities PublicPublic Vehicles FirePoliceVehiclesPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPublicPubl icPublicPublicPublic TotalTOTAL Workshop Packet Page Number 3 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 1 2 0 Debt 2 , 8 2 e n u J Workshop Packet Page Number 4 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 5 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 6 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 7 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 8 of 53 s t n e m e v o r p m I t e e r t S d n a n o i t c u d e R t b e D Workshop Packet Page Number 9 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 10 of 53 Does not authorize expendituresCouncil must authorize each item prior to spending Workshop Packet Page Number 11 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 12 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 13 of 53 t b e D w e N l a t o T 6 5 5 , 7 1 8 , 1 2 $ Workshop Packet Page Number 14 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 15 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 16 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 17 of 53 e k a t l l i w d a o r y n a , g n i o g e r Ô u o y e r e l l o h r r w a C s w i w o e n L k . t Ô É n e r o e d h t u o u y o f Iy Workshop Packet Page Number 18 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 19 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 20 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 21 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 22 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 23 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 24 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 25 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 26 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 27 of 53 E2 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOPSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date June 28, 2021 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER: Jeff Thomson, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Highway 36 Transit Feasibility Study Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution OrdinanceContract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: The City of Maplewood has been partnering in a high-level planning study led by Washington County in collaboration with other cities along Highway 36, Ramsey County, Hennepin County, Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Council. The study has lasted approximately one year, during which time corridor communities, operational agencies, local businesses and community stakeholders, and the public were afforded a chance to help establish a common vision, develop priorities, and identify the necessary steps for implementation. Project staff from Washington County will be attending the city council workshop on June 28 to provide an update on this project. Recommended Action: No action required. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact?NoYes, the true or estimated cost is $0. Financing source(s):Adopted BudgetBudget ModificationNew Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Financial SustainabilityIntegrated CommunicationTargeted Redevelopment Operational EffectivenessCommunity InclusivenessInfrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The city supports regional transit projects that connect Maplewood to the region. Both the Gold Line and Rush Line transit projects originated from feasibility studies like the one discussed within this report. Workshop Packet Page Number 28 of 53 E2 Background The Highway 36 Transit Feasibility Study is looking at the potential for transit improvements in the Highway 36 corridor, which extends about 27 miles between the Saint Croix Valley area and downtown Minneapolis – running through Maplewood. Previous transit and highway studies have consistently shown that Highway 36 is a critical connection between the east metro and other parts of the Twin Cities. The study is also working to: Identify transit service needs and recommendations that are reflective of the Highway 36 corridor’s existing and anticipated future travel demands and patterns. Consider transit and complementary facilities to improve travel options and provide viable alternatives to highway congestion for Washington, Ramsey, and Hennepin county residents, businesses, and visitors. Attachments 1. Presentation Workshop Packet Page Number 29 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 l i c n u o C y t i C d o o w e l p a M Study Presentation 6/28/2021Emily Jorgensen, Project ManagerJoe Ayers-Johnson, Asst. Project Manager Workshop Packet Page Number 30 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 n o i t a t n e s e r Study Background & Scope Study Goals Public Engagement SummaryTransit Scenarios RecommendationsNext Steps P 1.2.3.4.5.6. Workshop Packet Page Number 31 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s l a o G & e p o c S y d u t S Workshop Packet Page Number 32 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 ? y d u t S t i s n a r T 6 3 y a w h g i H e h t s i t a h W : e p o c S y d u t Identify transit service needs and recommendations that are reflective of the Highway 36 ĭƚƩƩźķƚƩ͸ƭ ĻǣźƭƷźƓŭ ğƓķ ğƓƷźĭźƦğƷĻķ ŅǒƷǒƩĻ ƷƩğǝĻƌ ķĻƒğƓķƭ ğƓķ ƦğƷƷĻƩƓƭConsider transit and complementary facilities to improve travel options and provide alternatives to highway congestion for Washington, Ramsey, and Hennepin County residents, businesses, and visitors S The purpose of this study is to:¤¤ Workshop Packet Page Number 33 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 ? d Operations e v Working Group l Technical Advisory o v n i s i o h W : Project Management Team e Group p o c City Technical S Advisory Working y d u t S Workshop Packet Page Number 34 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s l a o G y d u t S Workshop Packet Page Number 35 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 y r a m m u S t n e m e g a g n E c i l b u P Workshop Packet Page Number 36 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 for people who rely on y r a of traveling without car in this corridor m from people living, working, or m improving mobility u greater Stillwater area tions in the Highway 36 corridor S t n e interested in taking transit m e g a improving the convenience g n E of respondents are c i l 73%Traffic congestion on Highway 36,transit, andwere of most importance to respondentsDemand to get around within the b u Conducted focus groups with businesses, governmental agencies, medical providers, and organizaCollected over 1,200 questionnaires going to school in the Highway 36 corridor P Workshop Packet Page Number 37 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s o i r a n e c S t i s n a r T Workshop Packet Page Number 38 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s n o i t i n i f e D t i s n a r T : s All day bi-directional serviceMixed trafficor bus lanesInfrequent and high amenity stationsTypical park-and-rideservicePeak traffic periodsMixed traffic or bus lanesSimilarto regular route bus1-2 miles between stopsFlexible stop spacingLow amenity stopsUbermeets Metro MobilityCar or van Specific geographic service areaFirstmile/last mile ordoor-to-door service o ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ i r a n e c S t i s n Express Bus a Local Express Bus Demand Public Transit r - T Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ΛƦƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ ĭğƌƌĻķͻ\[źƒźƷĻķ {ƷƚƦͼΜ On Workshop Packet Page Number 39 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 t i s n a r T c i l b u P d n a m e D Door-to-door service or first mile/last mileNo formal route, responds to daily demandOn-demand, reservations not requiredNo price surges - ¤¤¤¤ n not sustainable A solution for areas that need transit but fixed-route isSpecific geographic service area Request ride via app, website, phone callShared ride is sent to pick up riderAll vehicles are ADA compliant O ͻ5źğƌΏğΏwźķĻ ƒĻĻƷƭ ĬĻƩΉ\[ǤŅƷͼHow does it work? Workshop Packet Page Number 40 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s i l o p a e n n i M o t t S : s e o c i i r R a - n e 1 c o S i r t i a s n n e a c r TS Workshop Packet Page Number 41 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s i l o p a e n n i M o t l l a M d o o w e : l s p o i a r a M - n e 2 c o S i r t i a s n n e a c r TS Workshop Packet Page Number 42 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s i l o p a e n n i M o t e v A y e : l s d o i a r H a - n e 3 c o S i r t i a s n n e a c r TS Workshop Packet Page Number 43 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s i l o p a e n n i M o t r e t a : w s l l o i i t r S a - n e 4 c o S i r t i a s n n e a c r TS Workshop Packet Page Number 44 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 $17M $80-110M Scenario Stillwater $15M Scenario $80-105M Hadley Ave n o i t a $16M $75-100M Scenario u l a Maplewood Mall v E d e s a $13M Rice St Scenario B o i r a n e c S (2030) Measure Evaluation Operations & Maintenance Cost Capital Cost (2030)$80-105M (Average Weekday)3,500-4,6003,700-5,3003,000-4,3002,600-3,800 Estimated Ridership Workshop Packet Page Number 45 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 feasible y feasible t i l i feasible b i s a e F & n preferred scenario for the corridor o i t e Hwy 36 corridor is a u l a v E o i r a n e c Transitway investment in the Hwy 36 corridor is Bus Rapid Transit in thTransitway investment along Hwy 36 to Stillwater is So, which scenario is the best? Next step is to identify the S The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility of transit improvements on Highway 36 between Minneapolis and Stillwater. The evaluation shows: Workshop Packet Page Number 46 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s n o i t a d n e m m o c e R y d u t S Workshop Packet Page Number 47 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 s e g n e l l a h C d n a t x e t n o C g n i t s Financial challenges and constraintsUncertain changes to transit marketCompeting transit priorities for our county partnersFinancial constraintsCompeting transit priorities i x COVID-19 PandemicCounty ParticipationMetropolitan Council/Metro Transit Participation E Workshop Packet Page Number 48 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 m r e T r a e N : s n o and invest in mobility management i t a d n e m m o c e R y d u t Study and consider pilot on-demand public transit serviceContinue to prioritize, maintain, S 0-2 Years: Focus on Washington County Workshop Packet Page Number 49 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 m r e t - d i M : s n o i to report to the corridor commission t a d n e m m o c e R y d Identify funding sourcesDevelop multijurisdictional agreementScope out future studies and projects (transit service and infrastructure, including mobility management) u ¤¤¤ t Work with Metro Transit and St. Croix County on monitoring need for peak period express bus service Form a corridor commission to: S 3-5 Years: Form Hwy 36 Corridor Commission¤ Workshop Packet Page Number 50 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 m r e T r e g n o L : s n o i rridor commission to develop and t s in the Highway 36 corridor for a d n e m m o c e R y d u t Develop a plan for mobility hubadoption by the commissionPartner with cities to develop small area plans for transit access areas along the corridorPartner with MnDOT and the coadopt transit advantages plan for Highway 36 and Highway 280 S 5-8 Years: Develop Corridor Plans & Partnerships Workshop Packet Page Number 51 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 g n i o g n O : s n to plan and construct bicycle and o i t a d n e m m o c e R y d u t Partner with the cities and MnDOT pedestrian infrastructure, including applying for funding opportunitiesContinue engagement efforts throughout future transit projects in the corridor S Ongoing: Continue engagement & collaboration Workshop Packet Page Number 52 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 m o ? c . s : t i e n t s i s n o b i a e r t T W s t 6 c e 3 e j y u o a r P Q w h g i H Workshop Packet Page Number 53 of 53