Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-01-19 CDRB Packet Meeting is also available on Comcast Ch. 16 and streaming via maplewoodmn.gov AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Tuesday, January 19, 2021 6:00 P.M. Held Remotely Via Conference Call Dial 1-888-788-0099 or 1-312-626-6799 When Prompted Enter Meeting ID: 915 7053 8558# No Participant ID, Enter # When Prompted A.Call to Order B.Roll Call C.Approval of Agenda D.Approval of Minutes: 1.September 15, 2020 E.New Business: 1.Design Review, Saint John’s Hospital, 1575 Beam Avenue East 2.Election of Officers (No Report) F.Unfinished Business: G.Visitor Presentations: H.Board Presentations: I.Staff Presentations: J.Adjourn D1 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 6:00 P.M. (THIS MEETING WAS HELD REMOTELY VIA CONFERENCE CALL) A. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Kempe called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Chairperson, Bill Kempe Present Boardmember, Jason Lamers Present Vice Chairperson, Matt Ledvina Present Boardmember, Ananth Shankar Present at 6:05 p.m. Boardmember, Bruce Thompson Absent Staff Present: Michael Martin, Assistant Community Development Director Jeff Thomson, Community Development Director C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Boardmember Kempe moved to approve the agenda as amended. Seconded by Boardmember Lamers. Ayes - All The motion passed. D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Boardmember Ledvina moved to approve theAugust 18, 2020, CDRB minutes as submitted. Seconded by Boardmember Lamers. Ayes – All The motion passed. E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Design Review, Raising Cane’s, 3065 White Bear Avenue North i. Assistant Community Development Director, Michael Martin gave the report on the Design Review for Raising Cane’s, 3065 White Bear Avenue North. ii. Ben Johnson, Kimley-Horn, Patricia Hill, Adams Hill, LLC and Dusty Johnston, ADA Architects, Inc, addressed and answered questions of the board. Boardmembers Lamers and Ledvina made friendly amendments that are reflected in the motion below in bold and underlined. September 15, 2020 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 1 CDRB Packet Page Number1 of 24 D1 Boardmember Lamers moved to approve the resolution for design review for project plans date- stamped September 1, 2020, for a new fast food restaurant to be constructed at 3065 White Bear Avenue North. (changes to the staff conditions are underlined and in bold): 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3. Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated September 4, 2020. 4. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 5. All signs must meet the requirements of the city’s sign ordinance. Freestanding or monument signs shall be designed to be consistent with the project’s building materials and colors. 6. The factory finish color of the roof-top units shall match the color of the roof. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a. The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. b. Submit to staff a copy of the executed cross-access easement agreement allowing access to the mall ring road. c. Submit to staff elevations for the trash enclosure. 8. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lots and driveways. c. Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d. Install all required outdoor lighting. 9. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 10. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may September 15, 2020 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 2 CDRB Packet Page Number2 of 24 D1 approve minor changes. 11. The applicant shall use the Belden Norman EFW-1 brick as defined on the building elevation for the trash enclosure for site continuity of building materials. 12. The applicant shall work with staff regarding the landscaping plan and taking another look at the existing vegetation, particularly along the south boundary of the site in an effort to preserve the existing trees. Seconded by Boardmember Kempe. Ayes – All All friendly amendments were agreed upon. The motion passed. 2. Design Review, Maplewood Living Development, 0 Maplewood Drive i. Assistant Community Development Director, Michael Martin gave the report on the Design Review for Maplewood Living Development, 0 Maplewood Drive and answered questions of the board. ii. Pete Boulay, 1100 County Road C East, Don Christianson, 1111 County Road C East and Nicole Evenson, resident of Town and Country Mobile Home Park addressed the board. Boardmembers Shankar, Ledvina and Lamers made friendly amendments that are reflected in the motion below in bold and underlined. Boardmember Shankar moved to approve the resolution for design review for project plans date- stamped August 18, 2020, for a new apartment building to be constructed at 0 Maplewood Drive. (changes to the staff conditions are underlined and in bold): 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3. Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated September 2, 2020. 4. Meet all requirements in the environmental report, dated September 8, 2020. 5. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 6. Rooftop vents and equipment shall be located out of view from all sides of the property. 7. Any identification or monument signs for the project must meet the requirements of the city’s sign ordinance. Identification or monument signs shall be designed to be consistent with the project’s building materials and colors. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: September 15, 2020 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 3 CDRB Packet Page Number3 of 24 D1 a. The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. b. Submit to staff a screening plan detailing that all ordinance requirements are met in terms of screening on the north side of the north parking lot. 9. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Apply for and receive approval for a lot division to combine the three parcels into one. Applicant shall be required to provide proof of Ramsey County recording to city staff. b. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. c. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lots and driveways. d. Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. e. Install all required outdoor lighting. 10. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 11. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 12. All exposed walls of the basement of this building, on all sides, shall be faced with material and color that matches the material and color shown on the third floor of the building façade. 13. The applicant shall provide at least one speed bump on the north parking lot and the southeast parking lot approximately halfway in the middle of the parking lot. 14. The city and the applicant shall work together at this point or at a future date in terms of making a trail connection to the park to the west. 15. The applicant shall provide to the CDRB for review, a copy of the screening plan detailing that all ordinance requirements are met in terms of screening on the north side of the north parking lot. Seconded by Boardmember Ledvina. Ayes – All All friendly amendments were agreed upon. September 15, 2020 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 4 CDRB Packet Page Number4 of 24 D1 The motion passed. F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. G.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. H.BOARD PRESENTATIONS None. I.STAFF PRESENTATIONS None. J.ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Chairperson Kempe at 7:04 p.m. September 15, 2020 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 5 CDRB Packet Page Number5 of 24 E1 COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Meeting Date January 19, 2021 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Saint John’s Hospital, 1575 Beam Avenue East a. Design Review Resolution Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: Kevin Martin of Fairview is proposing to build a 21,000-square-foot vertical building expansion to Saint John’s Hospital located at 1575 Beam Avenue East. This planned project would expand the third floor of the facility and does not increase the overall building footprint. To move forward with this project, the applicant needs city council approval of a conditional use permit amendment and design review. Recommended Action: a. Motion to approve a resolution for a design review for a 21,000-square-foot vertical building expansion to be constructed at 1575 Beam Avenue East. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0. Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Financial Sustainability Integrated Communication Targeted Redevelopment Operational Effectiveness Community Inclusiveness Infrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on January 8, 2021. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is March 9, 2021. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. Background: The applicant seeks to vertically expand the existing Saint John’s Hospital to provide cardiac catheterization capability to the facility adjacent to the surgery department on level two. When designed, the existing facility structure was designed to accommodate vertical growth. The CDRB Packet Page Number6 of 24 E1 expansion would add approximately 21,000-square-feet to the existing six-story, 303,000-square- foot facility. As a vertical expansion, there is no impact to the existing site design, utilities or landscaping. Conditional Use Permit Amendment Staff finds no problem with the proposed expansion from a use standpoint. The proposed expansion complies with the findings required for approval of a CUP. Design Review Building Elevations The proposed building addition will be constructed of metal panels that provide color compatibility with the existing building but also provide contrast in terms of building materials. All design elements would be attractive and compatible with the existing architecture of the neighborhood. Parking City ordinance does not have a specific parking requirement for hospitals. The city has approved parking plans for the campus via previous conditional use permit approvals. The hospital campus currently has 1,252 parking spaces. Given how this proposed building expansion is intended to be used staff does not expect a significant increase in parking demand to be generated due to this project. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to maintain at least 1,252 parking spaces via this approval process. Department Comments Engineering, Environmental, Building and Public Safety Departments have reviewed and do not have any additional comments. Board and Commission Review January 19, 2021: The community design review board will review this project. January 19, 2021: The planning commission will hold a public hearing and review this project. Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 11 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed project area for their opinion about this proposal. Staff did not receive any replies. Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 28 acres Existing Land Use: Saint John’s Hospital Campus CDRB Packet Page Number7 of 24 E1 Surrounding Land Uses North: Surface parking lot and townhomes East: Medical office buildings South: Beam Avenue and medical office buildings West: Hazelwood Street, medical office building and gas station Planning Existing Land Use: Employment Existing Zoning: Business Commercial Previous Actions May 20, 1982: Approved the original CUP. May 12, 1997: Approved a 25-foot front setback variance for the parking ramp. Approved a 10-foot parking lot setback variance from Hazelwood Street Approved a CUP revision. Approved site and building design plans. November 10, 1997: Approved the proposal for the stand-alone medical building north of the hospital. November 23, 1998: Vacated the former St. John’s Boulevard right-of-way that was not in the location of the eventual road placement. September 22, 2008: Approved CUP amendment and vacations related to an expansion project. Attachments: 1. Conditional Use Permit Amendment 2. Design Review Resolution 3. Overview Map 4. 2040 Land Use Map 5. Zoning Map 6. Applicant Narrative 7. Site Plan 8. Building Renderings 9. Applicant’s Plans, Date-Stamped December 24, 2020 (separate attachments) CDRB Packet Page Number8 of 24 E1, Attachment 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENTRESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Fairview has requested approval of a conditional use permit amendment. 1.02 The property is located at 1575 Beam Avenue East and is legally described as: PIN: 032922130014 – The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the Government Survey thereof except the following parcels: The East 40.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter lying northerly of the South 660.00 feet thereof. Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, being the center of said Section 3, said point being marked by a Ramsey County monument; thence along the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, North 00 degrees 01 minutes 40 seconds East, assumed basis of bearing, a distance of 703.29; thence on a bearing of East 437.93 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing on a bearing of East 264.24 feet; thence on a bearing of South 124.13 feet; thence on a bearing of West 264.24 feet; thence on a bearing of North 124.13 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to easements of record. Section 2. Standards. 2.01 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. City Ordinance Section 44-1097(a) states that the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine standards for approval. 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. CDRB Packet Page Number9 of 24 E1, Attachment 1 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The proposal meets the specific conditional use permit standards. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering the conditional use permit for a planned unit development amendment request. 1. On January 19, 2021, the planning commission held a public hearing. City staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council _______ this resolution. 2. On January 25, 2021, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): 1.All construction shall follow the approved siteplans, date-stamped December 24, 2020. The planning staff may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. Compliance with the city's engineering report by Steve Love dated July 8, 2008. 4. The property owner shall maintain at least 1,252 parking spaces on the hospital campus. Parking spaces shall be at least 9.5 feet wide; employee parking may be 9 feet wide. __________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on January 25, 2021. CDRB Packet Page Number10 of 24 E1, Attachment 2 DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Fairview has requested approval of a design review. 1.02 The property is located at 1575 Beam Avenue East and is legally described as: PIN: 032922130014 – The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the Government Survey thereof except the following parcels: The East 40.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter lying northerly of the South 660.00 feet thereof. Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, being the center of said Section 3, said point being marked by a Ramsey County monument; thence along the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, North 00 degrees 01 minutes 40 seconds East, assumed basis of bearing, a distance of 703.29; thence on a bearing of East 437.93 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing on a bearing of East 264.24 feet; thence on a bearing of South 124.13 feet; thence on a bearing of West 264.24 feet; thence on a bearing of North 124.13 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to easements of record. 1.03 On January 19, 2021, the community design review board reviewed this request. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information to the community design review board. The community design review board considered all of the comments received and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into this resolution. Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development are in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and are not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a CDRB Packet Page Number11 of 24 E1, Attachment 2 desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. City Council Action. 3.01.1 The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the design plans date-stamped December 24, 2020. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Obtain a conditional use permit from the city council for this expansion. 2. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 3. All requirements of the city engineer, fire marshal and building official must be met. 4. Rooftop vents and equipment shall be screened from view from residential properties to the north and west. 5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. __________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on January 25, 2021. CDRB Packet Page Number12 of 24 E1, Attachment 3 Saint John's Hospital - 1575 Beam Avenue East December 22, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend ! I P 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number13 of 24 E1, Attachment 4 Saint John's Hospital - 1575 Beam Avenue East December 22, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Future Land Use - 2040 Low Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed-Use - Community Commercial Public/Institutional Employment Utility Open Space Park P 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number14 of 24 E1, Attachment 5 Saint John's Hospital - 1575 Beam Avenue East December 22, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Zoning Open Space/Park Single Dwelling (r1) Planned Unit Development (pud) Light Manufacturing (m1) Business Commercial Modified (bcm) Business Commercial (bc) P 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number15 of 24 E1, Attachment 6 Maplewood Environmental and Economic Development Department Conditional Use Application Re: St. John’s Hospital Vertical Expansion- Cardiac Cath Suite The enclosed Conditional Use Permit request seeks to vertically expand the existing St. John’s Hospital, located at 1575 Beam Avenue, to provide cardiac cath capability to the facility adjacent to the surgery department on level 2. When designed, the existing facility structure was designed to accommodate vertical growth. The expansion would add approximately 21,000 SF to the existing 6-storey, 303,000 SF facility. As a vertical expansion, there is no impact to the existing site design, utilities, or landscaping. Application Submittal 1. Drawings See Attached Plans, Elevations 2. Narrative Project Description o This project is a 1-storey vertical expansion on level 2 at the southwest corner of the existing St. John’s Hospital. The expansion would add approximately 21,000 SF to the existing 6-storey, 303,000 SF facility adjacent to the existing surgery department. The project includes 5 Labs, 14 prep/recovery rooms, and miscellaneous support space. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City’s comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances. o The addition will be in compliance with all applicable local building codes and all requirements of the State of Minnesota’s Department of Public Health. The project will maintain the existing operations of the Hospital’s original Conditional Use Permit. The scale of the addition aligns with the existing facility’s massing and aesthetics and is located over a portion of the structure originally designed to accept a 2-storey addition. The proposed project includes 1-storey with no accommodations for future vertical growth. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. o The project is located at an intersection comprised primarily of commercial and medical developments and does not change the character of the surrounding area. The proposed exterior finish materials, color, and aesthetic of the expansion compliments the materials and colors of the existing facility. The use would not depreciate property values. o The use of this project aligns with the use of the existing hospital and will not depreciate property values. The expanded service line of cardiac cath at St. John’s will improve the neighborhood’s access to this line of medical care, previously not provided. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. o This addition is vertical in nature and will have no impact to the surrounding environment and will not increase storm water run-off. The selection of earth-toned CDRB Packet Page Number16 of 24 E1, Attachment 6 metal panel on the façade blends into the existing facility and does not create glare. The aesthetic of the expansion blends with the existing facility. The operations of this added amenity to the Hospital will be fully contained inside the space and will have no impacts to its surroundings. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. o The associated use of this facility will have minimal impact to the existing traffic and surrounding streets. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. o The existing services were originally sized for future growth, therefore there are no impacts anticipated to public facilities and services. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. o This use does not create additional costs for public facilities or services. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and scenic features into the development design. o The overall intention of the earth-toned metal panel cladding is to blend into the natural landscape around the hospital and with the adjacent wetland. The selected materials compliment the masonry of the existing facility while lightening the heaviness of the mass, creating a cohesive façade. Bands of high windows further soften the exterior design while simultaneously providing daylight to the interiors and maintaining patient privacy. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. o The use causes no adverse environmental effects. The City Council may waive any of the above requirements of a public building or utility structure, provided the Council shall first make a determination that the balancing of public interest between governmental units of the state would be best served by such waiver. o This project seeks a waiver related to the portions of this application not applicable to a vertical addition. 3. Property Owners Available on request 4. Application Fees The following fees are included under separate cover: o $1,000 – Conditional Use Permit Revisions o $46 – County Recording Fee o $200 – development site notification sign 5. Engineering Escrow Not applicable – Project does not alter existing site characteristics. CDRB Packet Page Number17 of 24 E1, Attachment 7 *Parking is in compliance with the previousagreements on file with the City of Maplewood, thereare no planned increases to the current parking lots oncampus for this project. For more information onparking agreements with the Hospital, please contactDanielle Gathje- dgathje@healtheast.org 612-232-7107 LFOBSE!TUSFFU IB\[FMXPPE!TUSFFU CDRB Packet Page Number18 of 24 E1, Attachment 8 ,0.!25(.1#25(.1#3(.5# CDRB Packet Page Number19 of 24 E1, Attachment 8 25(.1#3(.5#,0.!38(.1# FYJTUJOH CDRB Packet Page Number20 of 24 E1, Attachment 8 3(.5#25(.1#,0.!38(.1# CDRB Packet Page Number21 of 24 E1, Attachment 8 ,0.!25(.5#,0.!23(.9#25(.1#3(.5# CDRB Packet Page Number22 of 24 E1, Attachment 8 CDRB Packet Page Number23 of 24 E1, Attachment 8 CDRB Packet Page Number24 of 24