Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-09-15 CDRB Packet Meeting is also available on Comcast Ch. 16 and streaming via maplewoodmn.gov AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Tuesday, September 15, 2020 6:00 P.M. Held Remotely Via Conference Call Dial 1-888-788-0099 When Prompted Enter Meeting ID: 938 2535 7195# No Participant ID, Enter # When Prompted A.Call to Order B.Roll Call C.Approval of Agenda D.Approval of Minutes: 1.August 18, 2020 E.New Business: 1.Design Review, Maplewood Living Development, 0 Maplewood Drive 2.Design Review, Raising Cane’s, 3065 White Bear Avenue North F.Unfinished Business: G.Visitor Presentations: H.Board Presentations: I.Staff Presentations: J.Adjourn This page intentionally left blank D1 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2020 6:00 P.M. (THIS MEETING WAS HELD REMOTELY VIA CONFERENCE CALL) A.CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Kempe called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. B.ROLL CALL Chairperson, Bill KempePresent Boardmember, Jason LamersPresent Vice Chairperson, Matt LedvinaPresent Boardmember, Ananth ShankarPresent Boardmember, Bruce ThompsonAbsent Staff Present: Michael Martin, Assistant Community Development Director C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA Boardmember Lamers moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Boardmember Ledvina. Ayes - All The motion passed. D.APPROVAL OF MINUTES Boardmember Ledvina moved to approve theMay 19, 2020, CDRB minutes as submitted. Seconded by Boardmember Lamers. Ayes – All The motion passed. E.NEW BUSINESS 1.Design Review and Comprehensive Sign Review, Woodspring Suites, 1744 County Road D East i.Assistant Community Development Director, Michael Martin gave the report on the Design Review for Woodspring Suites, 1744 County Road D East and answered questions of the board. Boardmember Shankar made a friendly amendment that is reflected in the motion below in bold and underlined. August 18, 2020 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes CDRB Packet Page Number1 of 59 D1 Boardmember Shankar moved toapprove the resolution for design review and a comprehensive sign review for project plans date-stamped July 28, 2020 for a new hotel to be constructed at 1744 County Road D East. (changes to the staff conditions are underlined and in bold): 1.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2.All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3.Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated August 7, 2020. 4.The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 5.Rooftop vents and equipment shall be located out of view from residential properties to the south and west. 6.A comprehensive sign plan is approved for this site per the following conditions. a.A maximum of two monument signs are approved for this site. A monument sign on the Bittersweet Lane side of the site may be up 140-square-feet in size. A monument sign on the Flandrau Street side of the site may be up to 80-square-feet in size. Monument signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. b.Two wall signs are permitted. One wall sign on the north elevation and one wall sign on the east elevation. Wall signs shall not exceed 100 square feet or 20 percent of wall face to which it is attached, whichever is less. c.All signs require permits. 7.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a.Revised site plan showing the parking lot front yard setback of 15 feet being met. b.Revised landscaping plan showing at least nine trees being planted along Village Trail as required per this site’s planned unit development. c.The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. 8.The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a.Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b.Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. c.Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all August 18, 2020 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes CDRB Packet Page Number2 of 59 D1 landscaped areas. d.Install all required outdoor lighting. 9.If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a.The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b.The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 10.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 11.The applicant shall add brick to center bays on north and south elevation and on stair towers on north elevation. Brick shall extend to roof line. Seconded by Boardmember Lamers. Ayes – Chairperson Kempe, Boardmembers Lamers, & Shankar Nay – Boardmember Ledvina All friendly amendments were agreed upon. The motion passed. Boardmember Ledvina voted nay because he disapproved of the building height. 2.Design Review, Maple Ridge Grocery and Convenience Stores, 2501 White Bear Avenue i.Assistant Community Development Director, Michael Martin gave the report on the Design Review and Comprehensive Sign Plan Amendment for Maple Ridge Convenience Store, 2501 White Bear Avenue. ii.Phil Hoey, representing the applicant, addressed and answered questions of the board. Boardmember Shankar made a friendly amendment that is reflected in the motion below in bold and underlined. Boardmember Shankar moved to approve the resolution for design review for project plans date- stamped April 27, 2020 for new grocery and convenience stores to be constructed at 2501 White Bear Avenue. (changes to the staff conditions are underlined and in bold): 1.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2.All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. August 18, 2020 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes CDRB Packet Page Number3 of 59 D1 3.Meet all requirements in the design review resolution adopted by the city council on August 10, 2020. 4.The applicant shall on the small building extend the brick on the middle bay from the window to the edge all the way up to the parapet. 5.The applicant shallon the HyVee store paint three bays of base three feet high. Seconded by Boardmember Lamers. Ayes – Boardmembers Lamers, Ledvina & Shankar Nay – Chairperson Kempe All friendly amendments were agreed upon. The motion passed. Chairperson Kempe voted nay because he does not like the brick on the smaller building. F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. G.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. H.BOARD PRESENTATIONS None. I.STAFF PRESENTATIONS None. J.ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Chairperson Kempe at 7:14 p.m. August 18, 2020 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes CDRB Packet Page Number4 of 59 E1 COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Meeting Date September 15, 2020 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Design Review, Maplewood Living Development, 0 Maplewood Drive Action Requested: MotionDiscussion Public Hearing Form of Action:ResolutionOrdinanceContract/AgreementProclamation Policy Issue: Mark Paschke, of Ayres Associates, is proposing to develop a new three-story, 72-unit apartment building on vacant land located on Maplewood Drive, south of the intersection of County Road C East and Maplewood Drive. The apartment building is an approved use for this site but the design of the building and site needs to be reviewed and approved by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board. Recommended Action: Motion to approve a resolution for design review for project plans date-stamped August 18, 2020, for the 72-unit multi-family housing building to be constructed at 0 Maplewood Drive (PIDs: 09-29- 22-12-0009, 09-29-22-12-0010 and 09-29-22-12-0012). Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0. Financing source(s):Adopted BudgetBudget ModificationNew Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Financial SustainabilityIntegrated CommunicationTargeted Redevelopment Operational EffectivenessCommunity InclusivenessInfrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on September 1, 2020. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is October 31, 2020. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. CDRB Packet Page Number5 of 59 E1 Background: Design Review Site Plan The site will be accessed by three drives coming off Maplewood Drive. A single access point would be north of the building and would lead to the underground garage. Two access points provide access to a one-way drive and parking lot south of the building. The proposed apartment building and parking lots are concentrated on the east side of the lot, preserving buildable land on the west side of the lot. The area of land on the west side of the site, which is also west of a wetland, will not be built on as it is needed for residential density calculations. The building and parking lots meet all required setbacks including the 100 feet setback which is required to the north property line. Building Elevations The height of the three-story building is 34’ 8 7/8” feet – which meets city requirements. The exterior of the building will be comprised of brick, stone, metal panel and cementitious siding with a flat roof. All rooftop equipment will be required to be screened on all sides. Landscaping and Screening There are 143 significant trees equaling 1,996 diameter inches of trees on the property. The applicant is removing 35 significant trees equaling 533.5 diameter inches. Because so many trees are being preserved, the tree ordinance does not call out tree replacement for the development. The applicant’s landscape plan includes 25 new trees, for a total of 50.5 caliper inches. In addition to the trees, numerous shrubs and perennials will be planted around the building. City ordinance requires screening to be installed when light from automobile headlights and other sources would be directed into residential windows – in this case along the north property line in the area of the proposed parking lot. The ordinance states that minimum screening shall consist of a barrier at least six feet in height which provides a minimum opaqueness of 80 percent. If vegetation is used it must provide year-round screening, otherwise, a fence or combination of the two may be used. The applicant’s plans do not explicitly show how this screening requirement can be met year- round. Prior to a building permit being issued, the applicant shall be required to provide a plan showing that the screening requirement is met. Parking The city’s zoning ordinance states multi-family buildings must provide two parking spaces for each unit – with one of the parking spaces being covered. This proposed project will have a total of 144 parking stalls, with 72 parking spaces in the underground parking garage and 72 parking spaces in the two surface lots. Floor Area City ordinance requires a minimum of 580 square feet for both efficiencies and one-bedroom units. The applicant is proposing 31 efficiency units at 580 square feet in size and 36 one-bedroom units ranging from 849 to 907 square feet in size – exceeding the city’s minimum requirement. Two- bedroom units are required to be at least 740 square feet in size. This proposed project’s five two- bedroom units will be 1,024 to 1,058 square feet in size, again exceeding the city’s minimum requirement. CDRB Packet Page Number6 of 59 E1 Wetlands and Shoreland There is a Manage B wetland located in the center of the parcel. The city’s wetland ordinance requires a 50-foot minimum and 75-foot average wetland buffer. The wetland ordinance allows flexibility in instances where, because of the unique physical characteristics of a specific parcel of land, the averaging of buffer width for the entire parcel may be necessary to allow for the reasonable use of the land during a development or construction project. In such cases decreasing the minimum buffer width will be compensated for by increased buffer widths elsewhere in the same parcel to achieve the required average buffer width. This project is meeting the city’s wetland setback requirements. The Shoreland Overlay District for Kohlman Lake allows for 30 percent impervious surface coverage for an apartment complex. The parcel is 8.96 acres. The impervious surface area including the building, parking lot, and sidewalks will cover 1.26 acres. The overall impervious surface area encompasses 14 percent of the parcel, which meets the Shoreland Overlay District requirements. Lighting The applicant’s submitted photometric plan meets all city requirements. Lot Division to Combine Lots Prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued for this project, the applicant will be required to combine the existing three properties that comprise this project into a single site. This is an administrative process that does not require any additional review or approval. Department Comments Engineering Please see Jon Jarosch’s engineering report, dated September 2, 2020, attached to this report. Environmental Please see Shann Finwall’s environmental report, dated September 8, 2020, attached to this report. Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 130 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site for their opinion about this proposal. Staff received seven responses as shown below. 1. One of the reasons we moved here is due to the space around us that protects wildlife habitat. That is incredibly important to us and our values. Building these apartments would have a significant negative impact on the habitat of native wildlife, resulting in displacement. In addition, I am concerned about the increase in traffic. I am a runner, and oftentimes run in the early hours of the morning. I am concerned about the impact increased traffic could have on my safety and comfort level running around the neighborhood. I truly hope this development does not go through and hope you take this into consideration. (Stacey Meade, 1117 County Road C East) CDRB Packet Page Number7 of 59 E1 2.My uncle, Neal McClellan, whoused to live at 1091 County Road C East, died in December and I have inherited his property. I am having the house demolished, per his wishes, and will be selling the property. You asked for input on the proposed apartment. I actually grew up a few houses down from my uncle, and so am familiar with the property and area. I do have a couple of concerns: i. There will be a lot of people moving in there, and I am assuming there will be interest in visiting the park that is west of the development. County Road C does not have a very good shoulders on the street, which is much busier than when I lived there. Will there be constructed a walkway to the park over the wetlands so people can safely access the park? ii. There is no room to park on County Road C. I am wondering, even though there are houses between Co Rd C and the development, if people will want to park on Co Rd C. Are there any plans to expand Co Rd C with wider shoulders that people can park on it? iii. Along with # 2 above, what are Maplewood's plans for Co Rd C, given the increase in traffic that will come with the development? (Lynn Schurrer, 1091 County Road C East) 3. I was pleased to learn that there was not a variance requested and that the construction materials seem to be better than the usual “bricks and sticks” apartments. It sounds like the developer would like to work with the neighbors and I’m glad to hear that. While we all knew that someday development would probably happen behind us, it will certainly impact the value of our properties. Back when we were looking for homes, we passed on any that had an “apartment view.” In fact, having rental property or an apartment nearby was one of the first things our realtor disclosed. Here are some of my concerns and questions. Car noise. I see from the plans the main entrance to the apartment is the parking lot on the north side, along with the garage door on the northwest end of the apartment. My concern is that we will be hearing the cars driving into the lot with the walls of the apartment reflecting the noise. I'm concerned about the noise of the of the garage door opening and closing. With the 9% grade into the garage I worry that our backyards will be lit up with the lights from the cars exiting the building at night. Trees. The trees behind my property are numbers 35-39 green ash on the plans. What is missing on the plans are the two sugar maples nearby. If possible, we would like to have the two sugar maples saved behind our property. They are beautiful and in great shape. I would think it would be a good aesthetic view for the residents of the apartments too. As for Trees 35-39, what is the point of saving any green ash? They will likely be taken by Emerald Ash Borer soon enough. It would be interesting if something like tamarac would take root there, since that was what was in the wetland. The green ash was only able to grow because someone dumped construction debris and fill there. We would be O.K. if some or all of the green ash trees (35-39) were removed to spare the sugar maples. Property to the west of the wetland. From the plans, we were not able to determine what would be plans be for the land west of the wetland. There have been attempts over the years to place a road across the wetland CDRB Packet Page Number8 of 59 E1 without permission by the city to link up the parcels together. My concern is that there might be a phase 2. (Pete and Nancy Boulay, 1100 County Road C East) 4. In a call made to and summarized by staff – Concerns include disagreement on the location of the property line between resident and projects properties; who is included in the ownership group, concerns about ground water contamination because of this project and concerns about light and noise from apartment residents affecting existing residents. (James Nygard, 1110 County Road C East) 5. Three main opinions that I have – how it changes the existing neighborhood, safety concerns and nature preservation. i. Based on the surrounding neighborhood, three-story building will definitely stick out. There didn’t seem to be enough tree coverage to help it blend in at that height and would easily make it the tallest structure, making lighting a concern. It wasn’t clear to me what lighting would be included in the design and have reservations on how visible / disruptive it would be given the current neighborhood. ii. Concerns on traffic – The addition of potentially 50+ cars daily on County Road C creates a lot of anxiety for me. As it stands today, rarely is the speed limit adhered to and instead folks are going 50+mph on the road. This proposed development would only add to the number of cars using County Road C and have not seen any plans or proposals for minimizing this safety risk. iii. Impact on the wetlands and nature preserve, both in construction and on-going. One of the great things I love about the neighborhood is the nature preserve and the benefit it brings. Concerned about how much additional stress this would place on the ecosystem. During a neighborhood meeting last Winter, there was some discussion around the zoning of this property overall. While in your note it mentions the building is an approved use for the site, there was concern raised at that time that proper community notification was not given for the rezoning of that property in the past and caught everyone by surprised. Do you have any background on when the property was rezoned and how that was resolved? Just want to make sure I fully understand how that process works. Would prefer to see 2-story apartment building or townhomes on this development instead of what is proposed, along with specific details on how it would improve safety / traffic in the area. Feels like that would fit better within the current aesthetics of our neighborhood without placing more burden on the surrounding nature habitat. (Sheryl Sukolsky, 1085 County Road C East) 6. I totally oppose the apartment building going into the vacant lot. Roughly about 20 years ago the owner wanted to build more sites for the manufactured homes (Mobile Homes) and the city denied him, because it was considered wetland and could not be built on. Now 20 years later you are looking to build an apartment complex. This is the opinion of not only myself, but the majority of the residents here, some of which do not have access to, or own computers. There is also some residents of whom DID NOT receive your letter. I have reviewed the crime statistics for our area and it is increasing, if you allow an apartment complex in the area, this will draw more crime to the area with an above ground parking for them to rifle through or steal the entire car. CDRB Packet Page Number9 of 59 E1 Traffic will increase. Property value will go down, making it harder to sell homes in the area, because nobody wants to look at an apartment building and parking lot. The wildlife that we have here will decrease, the kids love feeding the ducks and geese and this year has been the best year for the wood ducks. The eagles and Hawks that prey on the source will be extinct. We have also seen the occasional coyote, deer, mink, raccoon. The geese and ducks have been fed for over 40 years and make this their home. We look forward to them coming back year after year. There was a stream that went from the pond over to County Road C, I do believe that there is an underground water source to Llake Kolhman , when the lake rises and lowers so does the pond. If you build an apartment complex on the land with a few hundred thousand pounds of concrete and steel we will watch it slowly sink. That's why we have our homes releveled every couple of years in the park. Mathew Frisbie from Frisbie Properties says its a short drive to major shopping, yes it is but Maplewood Mall is slowly going down hill, shops are closing because of cost so within 10 years it will be closed all together. why not utilize some of the property at the mall for an apartment complex and maybe it will bring in some new businesses. Please consider the opinion of the residents of Town and Country Mobile Home Park. Most are longtime residents, some have been here between 20-40 years. (Robert McGovern, 1102 Alvarado Drive) 7. Overall I think the plan looks good. It seems to save the wetland areas and the ponding areas. Which is good. Any place with a dog washing station has to be a nice place! The buildings look a little dark and foreboding to me, but I don’t know what current architecture looks like. Maybe they could be a little brighter? I think the whole thing could be moved another 20 to 30 feet south so as not to be so close to the homes on County Rd C. I also hope that there will be some trails down around the pond for those dog owners to walk their dogs. (Donald Christianson, 1111 County Road C East) Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 8.96 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Land Surrounding Land Uses North: Single Family Homes East: Maplewood Drive and Highway 61 South: Town and Country Manufactured Home Park West: Kohlman Park and Town and Country Manufactured Home Park Planning Existing Land Use: Medium Density Residential Existing Zoning: R3 – Multiple Dwelling CDRB Packet Page Number10 of 59 E1 Attachments: 1.Design Review Resolution 2. Overview Map 3. 2040 Future Land Use Map 4. Zoning Map 5. Wetland Map 6. Shoreland Overlay Map 7. Applicant’s Narrative 8. Site Plan 9. Landscape Plan 10. Building Elevations 11. Jon Jarosch’s Engineering Report, dated September 2, 2020 12. Shann Finwall’s Environmental Report, dated September 8, 2020 13. Applicant’s Plans (separate attachment) CDRB Packet Page Number11 of 59 E1, Attachment 1 DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Mark Paschke, of Ayres Associates, has requested approval of site and design plans for a multi-family housing project. 1.02 The properties are located along Maplewood Drive with the PIDs of 09-29-22-12- 0009, 09-29-22-12-0010 and 09-29-22-12-0012 and are legally described as: That part of Lot 8, W.H. Howard's Garden Lots, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 50 feet westerly of Line A described below. Except the East 455 feet of the West 715 feet of the North 203 feet of said Lot 8. Also except the West 260 feet of said Lot 8. And That part of Lot 7, W.H. Howard's Garden Lots, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 50 feet westerly of Line A described below. Except that part thereof lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 7 distant 200.00 feet east of the Northwest corner of said Lot 7 to the southwest corner of said Lot 7. And That part of Lot 6, W.H. Howard's Garden Lots, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line drawn parallel with and 50 feet westerly of Line A described below. And except that portion lying southerly of a line running from a point on the West line of and 85.7 feet North from the Southwest corner of said Lot 6 ta a paint on the East line of and 19.7 feet South of the Northeast corner of the South 66 feet of said Lot 6. Also excepting therefrom that part of the premises taken for widening of Trunk Highway No. 61 as shown in document No. 1702261. Line A Beginning at a point on the North line of said Section 9, distant 755.6 feet east of the North Quarter corner thereof; thence run southerly at an angle of 90 degrees with said North section line for 540.9 feet; thence deflect to the left on a 20 degrees 00 minute curve (delta angle 30 degrees 52 minutes 15 seconds) for 154.35 feet; thence on tangent to said curve for 125.26 feet; thence deflect to the right on a 20 degrees 00 minute curve (delta angle 31 degrees 36 minutes 04 seconds) for 158.01 feet; thence on tangent to said curve far 93.03 feet; thence deflect to the right on a 02 degrees 30 minutes curve (delta angle 16 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds) for 659.67 feet and there terminating. 1.03 On September 15, 2020, the community design review board reviewed this request. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information to the community design review board. The community design review board considered all of the CDRB Packet Page Number12 of 59 E1, Attachment 1 comments received and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into this resolution. Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. Community Design Review Board Action. 3.01.1 The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site and design plans date-stamped August 18, 2020. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3. Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated September 2, 2020. 4. Meet all requirements in the environmental report, dated September 8, 2020. 5. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 6. Rooftop vents and equipment shall be located out of view from all sides of the property. 7. Any identification or monument signs for the project must meet the requirements of the city’s sign ordinance. Identification or monument signs shall be designed to be consistent with the project’s building materials and colors. CDRB Packet Page Number13 of 59 E1, Attachment 1 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a. The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. b. Submit to staff a screening plan detailing that all ordinance requirements are met in terms of screening on the north side of the north parking lot. 10. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Apply for and receive approval for a lot division to combine the three parcels into one. Applicant shall be required to provide proof of Ramsey County recording to city staff. b. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. c. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lots and driveways. d. Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. e. Install all required outdoor lighting. 11. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 12. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. __________ by the Community Design Review Board of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on September 15, 2020. CDRB Packet Page Number14 of 59 E1, Attachment 2 Maplewood Living Development August 20, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend P 0350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number15 of 59 E1, Attachment 3 Maplewood Living Development August 20, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend Future Land Use - 2040 Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Commercial Public/Institutional Open Space Park P 0350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number16 of 59 E1, Attachment 4 Maplewood Living Development August 20, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend Zoning Open Space/Park Single Dwelling (r1) Multiple Dwelling (r3) Farm (f) Light Manufacturing (m1) P 0350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number17 of 59 E1, Attachment 5 Maplewood Living Development August 20, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend Wetlands Manage A Manage B Manage C P 0350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number18 of 59 E1, Attachment 6 Maplewood Living Development August 20, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend Shoreland Overlay P 0350 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number19 of 59 E1, Attachment 7 CDRB Packet Page Number20 of 59 E1, Attachment 7 CDRB Packet Page Number21 of 59 E1, Attachment 7 CDRB Packet Page Number22 of 59 E1, Attachment 8 MNMAPLEWOOD BYDATEREVISIONSNo. WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM LLC PHONE: 651-645-4197 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 EF MAPLEWOOD SITE PLAN © 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED FOR DEVELOPMENT C400 SHEET NUMBER MAPLEWOOD LIVING PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION R3-BR3-B 8.96 AC0.00 AC2.52 AC1.26 AC1.26 AC0.23 AC0.13 AC2.52 AC0.36 AC2.88 AC SIDE = 30' REAR = 30'8.96 AC ROAD = 15' 50' MINIMUM FRONT = 100' DWELLING 72 OUTSIDE SIDE/REAR = 15' PROPERTY AREA) 5 STALLS / 8 STALLS 144 SPACES @ 2 PER 21,291 SF (8% OF TOTAL 144 SPACES: 72 INSIDE AND AREAS PARKING PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK ZONING SUMMARY PROPERTY SUMMARY BUILDING DATA SUMMARY MAPLEWOOD LIVING DEVELOPMENT AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.NOTED.REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.SURVEY BY DEMARC, DATED 05/08/2020.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.ELECTRICAL PLAN.UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.INDICATED. TOTAL PROPERTY AREAON-STE DISTURBED AREAOFF-SITE DISTURBED AREATOTAL DISTURBED AREAWETLAND SETBACKADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA (ON-SITE)EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA (ON-SITE)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (ON-SITE)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (ON-SITE)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (OFF-SITE)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (OFF-SITE)EXISTING ZONINGPROPOSED ZONINGPARKING SETBACKSBUILDING SETBACKSPROPOSED PROPERTYBUILDING AREAREQUIRED PARKINGPROPOSED PARKING LEGEND 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT4.ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SITE PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS3.ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10'5.EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS7.SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A8.TOTAL LAND AREA IS 5.96 ACRES.9.PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND11.NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND12.REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY13.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.14.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.15.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9.5' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTTRANSITION CURBSTOP SIGN CONCRETE SIDEWALKEXISTING PIPE BOLLARDMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSMILL AND OVERLAY RESTRIPPED AREASHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)FLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONRETAINING WALLPROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN BY OTHERSCOURTYARD - SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANSPROPOSED TRANSFORMERPROPOSED SITE SIGNAGERETAINING WALL WITH 4' HIGH DECORATIVE FENCELIGHT POLE (PER SIGN VENDOR PLANS)RIP RAP AT DOWNSPOUT I FJLT ABCDEGHKNOPQRSUVX MW KEYNOTE LEGEND A T C ' 0 . 0 1 R "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN ' C 3 . 7 1 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE A U ' 0 . 0 1 C "ONE WAYTRAFFIC" SIGN' R 6' A . 8 '2 . 26 0 1 . 6 W ' 0 . U 6' 4 '. 0 . ''8 STORMWATER 5 0 . 1 02 5 TREE (TYP.) EXISTINGR1. R 8 MANAGEMENT AREA 2 24.0' ' H S0 ' '. ' . 0 0 .3 ' I. 0D KCABT 5ES GNIDLIUB "0-'51P .G 2'9 22.6' 5 RQ. 55Y F1 . 9 X 1T '1 2 ' W 6 . 8 KCABTES GNIDLIUB "0-'03 . 0 ' 5 1 0 .1 °' ' 5 0. 5 .9 6 5. R 4 2 5.0' (TYP.) 2 ' 0 . XV X' 5 W 1 6 . F0 E 1 8.0' 66.5' 8.0' TYP.TYP.TYP. 21.7' 18.0'24.0'18.0' 11.1' G EXISTING PROPERTYLINE (TYP.)V PE V A (TYP.)A V 5.0' R 64.4' 9.5' (TYP.) LEVEL 1: 869.65'LEVEL 2: 881.00' I MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING A (TYP.) H24.0' 3 STORY PLUS LOWER LEVEL PARKING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA: ±21,291 SF 68.7' V P W ' 5 . 4 R ' 0 . 2 'R 0 . 2 R EXISTING WETLAND KCABTES "0-'001 EXISTING WATEREDGE (TYP.) (TYP.) 50' WETLAND SETBACK EXISTING WETLAND DELINEATION G N I D L I U B O T R E F F U B G N I K R A P " 75' WETLAND SETBACK 0 - ' 5 1 NORTH .cnI ,setaicossA dna nroH-yelmiK ot ytilibail tuohtiw eb llahs .cnI ,setaicossA dna nroH-yelmiK yb noitatpada dna noitazirohtua nettirw tuohtiw tnemucod siht no ecnailer reporpmi dna fo esueR .deraperp saw ti hcihw rof tneilc dna esoprup cificeps eht rof ylno dednetni si ,ecivres fo tnemurtsni na sa ,niereh detneserp sngised dna stpecnoc eht htiw rehtegot ,tnemucod sihT K:\\Frisbie Properties, LLC\\3 Design\\CAD\\PlanSheets\\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg August 12, 2020 - 10:25pm CDRB Packet Page Number23 of 59 E1, Attachment 9 MNMAPLEWOOD BYDATEREVISIONSNo. WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM LLC PHONE: 651-645-4197 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 EF MAPLEWOOD LANDSCAPE PLAN 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED FOR DEVELOPMENT L100 SHEET NUMBER MAPLEWOOD LIVING PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 22-112 48 OC30" OC24" OC30" OC SIZE6` HT.6` HT.SIZE6` HT.6` HT.6` HT.SIZESIZESIZESIZE15" OCSIZE18" O.C. CALCALCALSPACINGSPACINGSPACINGSPACING CONTCONTCONTCONTCONT#5 CONT.4` O.C.#5 CONT.5` O.C.CONT#1 CONT.CONT#1 CONT#1 CONT#1 CONT B & BB & BB & BB & BB & BB & B2.5" CAL.B & B2.5" CAL.B & B2.5" CAL. SEED WITH MNDOT 22-112: FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 25-131: LOW MAINTENANCE TURF SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-262: DRY SWALE/ POND SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 33-361: STORMWATER NORTHEAST SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 34-171: WETLAND REHABILITATION SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-221: DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 35-241: MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL SEED MIX (TYP.)SEED WITH MNDOT 36-211: WOODLAND EDGE SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.) 25-13133-26133-36134-17135-22135-24136-211 22-11233-262 SEEDING KEYNOTES LANDSCAPE SUMMARY REQUIRED: 20' WIDE LANDSCAPE AREAPROVIDED: 20' WIDE LANDSCAPE AREAREQUIRED: SCREENING BETWEEN PARKING LOT AND RESIDENTIAL WINDOWSPROVIDED: SCREENING BETWEEN PARKING LOT AND RESIDENTIAL WINDOWSREQUIRED: SCREENING AROUND TRANSFORMER LOCATIONPROVIDED: ONE SIDE OF TRANSFORMER OPEN FOR ACCESS WHITE PINEWHITESPIRE BIRCH CLUMPAUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEWALKERS LOW CATMINT COMMON NAMEBLACK HILLS SPRUCECOMMON NAMEQUAKING ASPEN CLUMPRIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKCOMMON NAMEBOULEVARD LINDENSWAMP WHITE OAKCOMMON NAMECOMMON NAMEGRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMACRED TWIG DOGWOODCOMMON NAMELITTLE GOLD STAR RUDBECKIACOMMON NAMEKROSSA RAGAL DAYLILYPOW WOW WILDBERRY CONEFLOWER#1 CONTSTELLA DE ORO DAYLILY APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.) EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.) BOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAME QTYQTYQTYQTYQTYQTYQTY LANDSCAPE LEGEND WHP7PINUS STROBUSWSB3BETULA POPULIFOLIA `WHITESPIRE`ABM4ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE`TAU17TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII`TAUTON YEW#5 CONT.5` O.C.AFD9CORNUS SERICEA `ARTIC FIRE`ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD#5 CONT.3` O.C.ANH26HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE`ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA#5 CONT.4` O.C.WLC5NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW` CODEBHS3PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`CODEQUC2POPULUS TREMULOIDESRVB2BETULA NIGRACODEBOL3TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD`SWO1QUERCUS BICOLORCODEBAJ30JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `BLUE ARROW`BLUE ARROW JUNIPER#5 CONT.3` OCSGJ15JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN`SEA GREEN JUNIPER#5 CONT.5` O.C.CODEDBH12DIERVILLA LONICERADWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE#5 CONT.3` O.C.GLS6RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`RTD12CORNUS SERICEA `BAILEYI`CODEBEG171RUDBECKIA `LITTLE GOLD STAR`CODEHOS8HOSTA X `KROSSA REGAL`KFG23CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS#1 CONTPWW83ECHINACEA X `POW WOW WILDBERRY`SDO21HEMEROCALLIS X `STELLA DE ORO` A PLANT SCHEDULE CONIFEROUS TREEORNAMENTAL TREEOVERSTORY TREECONIFEROUS SHRUBSGROUND COVERS DECIDUOUS SHRUBSPERENNIALS EDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) ABCDE LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES T MAPLEWOOD DRIVE LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT 1 L100.1 2 LEVEL 1: 869.65'LEVEL 2: 881.00' L100.1 MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING 3 STORY PLUS LOWER LEVEL PARKING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA: ±21,291 SF LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT NORTH .cnI ,setaicossA dna nroH-yelmiK ot ytilibail tuohtiw eb llahs .cnI ,setaicossA dna nroH-yelmiK yb noitatpada dna noitazirohtua nettirw tuohtiw tnemucod siht no ecnailer reporpmi dna fo esueR .deraperp saw ti hcihw rof tneilc dna esoprup cificeps eht rof ylno dednetni si ,ecivres fo tnemurtsni na sa ,niereh detneserp sngised dna stpecnoc eht htiw rehtegot ,tnemucod sihT K:\\TWC_LDEV\\Frisbie Properties, LLC\\3 Design\\CAD\\PlanSheets\\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG August 13, 2020 - 12:10am CDRB Packet Page Number24 of 59 E1, Attachment 9 MNMAPLEWOOD BYDATEREVISIONSNo. WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM LLC PHONE: 651-645-4197 ENLARGEMENTS 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 EF MAPLEWOOD 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED FOR LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT L100.1 SHEET NUMBER MAPLEWOOD LIVING PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NORTH T D L100.1 35-241 D A 33-261 D A 35-241 SCALE: 1"=20' LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT 2 A NORTH L100.1 D C LEVEL 1: 869.65'LEVEL 2: 881.00' MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING C 3 STORY PLUS LOWER LEVEL PARKING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA: ±21,291 SF SCALE: 1"=20' LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT 1 .cnI ,setaicossA dna nroH-yelmiK ot ytilibail tuohtiw eb llahs .cnI ,setaicossA dna nroH-yelmiK yb noitatpada dna noitazirohtua nettirw tuohtiw tnemucod siht no ecnailer reporpmi dna fo esueR .deraperp saw ti hcihw rof tneilc dna esoprup cificeps eht rof ylno dednetni si ,ecivres fo tnemurtsni na sa ,niereh detneserp sngised dna stpecnoc eht htiw rehtegot ,tnemucod sihT K:\\TWC_LDEV\\Frisbie Properties, LLC\\3 Design\\CAD\\PlanSheets\\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG August 13, 2020 - 12:09am CDRB Packet Page Number25 of 59 E1, Attachment 9 CDRB Packet Page Number26 of 59 E1, Attachment 10 NBQMFXPPE!ESJWF!XFTU!'!BMWBSBEP!ESJWF XSJUUFO!QFSNJTTJPO!PG!BZSFT!BTTPDJBUFT/ 6977.Gby;!)826*!537 TIBMM!CF!VTFE!PS!SFQSPEVDFE!JO!BOZ!GPSN!PS!CZ!BOZ!NFBOT!XJUIPVU! 5:19.)826*!537 PG!BZSFT!BTTPDJBUFT/!BMM!SJHIUT!BSF!SFTFSWFE/!!OP!EFTJHOT!PS!QMBOT! NBQMFXPPE!MJWJOH!EFWFMPQNFOU Sjwfs!Gbmmt-!Xjtdpotjo!65133 UIF!EFTJHOT!BOE!QMBOT!JOEJDBUFE!PO!UIF!ESBXJOHT!BSF!UIF!QSPQFSUZ! 326!O/!Tfdpoe!Tusffu!Tvjuf!315 Sjwfs!Gbmmt!Pggjdf 4272.)826*!945 Fbv!Dmbjsf-!Xjtdpotjo!65812 FG!NBQMFXPPE!MMD 4544!Pblxppe!Ijmmt!Qbslxbz Fbv!Dmbjsf!Pggjdf NBSLEBUFEFTDSJQUJPO OPU!GPS!DPOTUSVDUJPO CDRB Packet Page Number27 of 59 E1, Attachment 10 NBQMFXPPE!ESJWF!XFTU!'!BMWBSBEP!ESJWF XSJUUFO!QFSNJTTJPO!PG!BZSFT!BTTPDJBUFT/ 6977.Gby;!)826*!537 TIBMM!CF!VTFE!PS!SFQSPEVDFE!JO!BOZ!GPSN!PS!CZ!BOZ!NFBOT!XJUIPVU! 5:19.)826*!537 PG!BZSFT!BTTPDJBUFT/!BMM!SJHIUT!BSF!SFTFSWFE/!!OP!EFTJHOT!PS!QMBOT! NBQMFXPPE!MJWJOH!EFWFMPQNFOU Sjwfs!Gbmmt-!Xjtdpotjo!65133 UIF!EFTJHOT!BOE!QMBOT!JOEJDBUFE!PO!UIF!ESBXJOHT!BSF!UIF!QSPQFSUZ! 326!O/!Tfdpoe!Tusffu!Tvjuf!315 Sjwfs!Gbmmt!Pggjdf 4272.)826*!945 Fbv!Dmbjsf-!Xjtdpotjo!65812 FG!NBQMFXPPE!MMD 4544!Pblxppe!Ijmmt!Qbslxbz Fbv!Dmbjsf!Pggjdf NBSLEBUFEFTDSJQUJPO OPU!GPS!DPOTUSVDUJPO CDRB Packet Page Number28 of 59 E1, Attachment 10 NBQMFXPPE!ESJWF!XFTU!'!BMWBSBEP!ESJWF XSJUUFO!QFSNJTTJPO!PG!BZSFT!BTTPDJBUFT/ 6977.Gby;!)826*!537 TIBMM!CF!VTFE!PS!SFQSPEVDFE!JO!BOZ!GPSN!PS!CZ!BOZ!NFBOT!XJUIPVU! 5:19.)826*!537 PG!BZSFT!BTTPDJBUFT/!BMM!SJHIUT!BSF!SFTFSWFE/!!OP!EFTJHOT!PS!QMBOT! NBQMFXPPE!MJWJOH!EFWFMPQNFOU Sjwfs!Gbmmt-!Xjtdpotjo!65133 UIF!EFTJHOT!BOE!QMBOT!JOEJDBUFE!PO!UIF!ESBXJOHT!BSF!UIF!QSPQFSUZ! 326!O/!Tfdpoe!Tusffu!Tvjuf!315 Sjwfs!Gbmmt!Pggjdf 4272.)826*!945 Fbv!Dmbjsf-!Xjtdpotjo!65812 FG!NBQMFXPPE!MMD 4544!Pblxppe!Ijmmt!Qbslxbz Fbv!Dmbjsf!Pggjdf NBSLEBUFEFTDSJQUJPO OPU!GPS!DPOTUSVDUJPO CDRB Packet Page Number29 of 59 E1, Attachment 10 NBQMFXPPE!ESJWF!XFTU!'!BMWBSBEP!ESJWF XSJUUFO!QFSNJTTJPO!PG!BZSFT!BTTPDJBUFT/ 6977.Gby;!)826*!537 TIBMM!CF!VTFE!PS!SFQSPEVDFE!JO!BOZ!GPSN!PS!CZ!BOZ!NFBOT!XJUIPVU! 5:19.)826*!537 PG!BZSFT!BTTPDJBUFT/!BMM!SJHIUT!BSF!SFTFSWFE/!!OP!EFTJHOT!PS!QMBOT! NBQMFXPPE!MJWJOH!EFWFMPQNFOU Sjwfs!Gbmmt-!Xjtdpotjo!65133 UIF!EFTJHOT!BOE!QMBOT!JOEJDBUFE!PO!UIF!ESBXJOHT!BSF!UIF!QSPQFSUZ! 326!O/!Tfdpoe!Tusffu!Tvjuf!315 Sjwfs!Gbmmt!Pggjdf 4272.)826*!945 Fbv!Dmbjsf-!Xjtdpotjo!65812 FG!NBQMFXPPE!MMD 4544!Pblxppe!Ijmmt!Qbslxbz Fbv!Dmbjsf!Pggjdf NBSLEBUFEFTDSJQUJPO OPU!GPS!DPOTUSVDUJPO CDRB Packet Page Number30 of 59 E1, Attachment 10 902303131!:;64;17!QN CDRB Packet Page Number31 of 59 E1, Attachment 10 902303131!:;64;68!QN CDRB Packet Page Number32 of 59 E1, Attachment 10 902303131!:;65;38!QN CDRB Packet Page Number33 of 59 E1, Attachment 11 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: Maplewood Drive at County Road C Apartments PROJECT NO: 20-24 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Assistant City Engineer DATE: 9-2-2020 PLAN SET: Engineering plans dated 8-13-2020 REPORTS: Stormwater Management Plan – Dated 5-18-2018 The applicant is seeking city approval to develop a 72 unit apartment project on roughly 9 acres of vacant land near the southwest corner of County Road C and Maplewood Drive. The applicant is requesting a review of the current design. The amount of disturbance on this site is greater than ½ acre. As such, the applicant is required to meet the City’s stormwater quality, rate control, and other stormwater management requirements. The applicant is proposing to meet these requirements via the use of an iron- enhanced filtration basin, infiltration basins, and an underground stormwater storage system. From the information submitted, it appears that the proposed design meets the City and Watershed District stormwater management requirements. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents and calculations for final review. The following are engineering review comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Drainage and Stormwater Management 1) The project shall be submitted to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) for review. All conditions of RWMWD shall be met. 2) A joint storm water maintenance agreement shall be prepared and signed by the owner for the proposed filtration basin, infiltration basins, pretreatment devices, and underground detention system. The Owner shall submit a signed copy of the joint storm- water maintenance agreement with the RWMWD to the City. 3) One of the methods being proposed to meet volume reduction requirements is iron- enhanced filtration. While the City is supportive of this method, our stormwater management standards don’t currently address iron-enhanced filtration. As such, the City will defer to the RWMWD methodology for calculating volume reduction credits generated through this method. CDRB Packet Page Number34 of 59 E1, Attachment 11 4) The applicant shall show how the proposed trench drain near the garage entrance at the northwest corner of the building will be routed on the utility plan. The trench drain shall not be connected into the sanitary sewer system. 5) The applicant shall aim to achieve 1-foot of freeboard between the emergency overflow for the underground detention system and the high-point near the top of the garage entrance ramp. The applicant shall work with the City to meet the intent of the City’s freeboard requirements in the City’s stormwater standards. 6) The 100-year HWL shall be displayed on the plans for the infiltration basin between the proposed building and Maplewood Drive. The emergency overflow for this basin shall be identified on the plans. 7) Outlet pipes discharging into wetlands and basins shall have minimal slopes to prevent scour at the outlet areas (0.5% Typical). 8) The 100-year HWL shall be depicted on the plans for the southerly infiltration basin. 9) While this project lies within the shoreland overlay district for Kohlman Lake, the amount of impervious surface coverage falls well beneath the allowable 30% coverage allowed by ordinance. Grading and Erosion Control 10) All slopes shall be 3H:1V or flatter. 11) Inlet protection devices shall be installed on all existing and proposed onsite storm sewer until all exposed soils onsite are stabilized. This includes storm sewer on adjacent streets that could potentially receive construction related sediment or debris. 12) Adjacent streets and parking areas shall be swept as needed to keep the pavement clear of sediment and construction debris. 13) All pedestrian facilities shall be ADA compliant. 14) The total grading volume (cut/fill) shall be noted on the plans. 15) A copy of the project SWPPP and NDPES Permit shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 16) The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project. CDRB Packet Page Number35 of 59 E1, Attachment 11 17) All modifications to the water system shall be reviewed by Saint Paul regional Water Services. All requirements of SPRWS shall be met. 18) All new sanitary sewer service piping shall be schedule 40 PVC or SDR35. 19) The proposed bored sanitary sewer line shall be pressure tested to ensure it is completely sealed to groundwater infiltration. Other 20) The applicant shall provide a self-renewing letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of 125% of the proposed site improvements including earthwork, grading, erosion control, site vegetation establishment, aggregate base, and paving. 21) The proposed sanitary sewer service line is shown crossing onto the neighboring property. The applicant shall verify that applicable easements are in place to allow for said connection. New easements may be required. Public Works Permits The following permits are required by the Maplewood Public Works Department for this project. The applicant should verify the need for other City permits with the Building Department. 22) Right-of-way permit 23) Grading and erosion control permit 24) Storm Sewer Permit 25) Sanitary Sewer Permit - END COMMENTS - CDRB Packet Page Number36 of 59 E1, Attachment 12 Environmental Review Project: Maplewood Living Apartments Date of Plans: August 13, 2020 Date of Review: September 8, 2020 Location: Vacant Parcel Located West of Maplewood Drive, south of the intersection of County Road C East and Maplewood Drive Reviewers: Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner (651) 249-2304; shann.finwall@maplewoodmn.gov Background: The applicant is proposing to develop the 8.96 acre vacant parcel with a 72-unit apartment complex. The parcel is located in the Shoreland Overlay District for Kohlman Lake. There is a Manage B wetland and significant trees located on the parcel. The proposal must comply with the City’s shoreland, wetland, and tree preservation ordinances, and infiltration basin planting policies. Shoreland Overlay District: The Shoreland Overlay District for Kohlman Lake allows for 30 percent impervious surface coverage for an apartment complex. The parcel is 8.96 acres. The impervious surface area including the building, parking lot, and sidewalks will cover 1.26 acres. The overall impervious surface area encompasses 14 percent of the parcel, which meets the Shoreland Overlay District requirements. Trees: 1. Tree Preservation Ordinance: a. Significant Trees: Maplewood’s tree preservation ordinance describes a significant tree as a healthy tree as follows - hardwood tree with a minimum of 6 inches in diameter, an evergreen tree with a minimum of 8 inches in diameter, and a softwood tree with a minimum of 12 inches in diameter. b. Specimen Trees: A specimen tree is defined as a healthy tree of any species which is 28 inches in diameter or greater. c. Tree Replacement: Tree replacement is based on a calculation of significant trees located on the parcel and significant trees removed. Credits are given for all specimen trees that are preserved. 2. Tree Impacts: There are 143 significant trees equaling 1,996 diameter inches of trees on the property. The applicant is removing 35 significant trees equaling CDRB Packet Page Number37 of 59 E1, Attachment 12 533.5 diameter inches. Because so many trees are being preserved, the tree ordinance does not call out tree replacement for the development. The development, however, must meet the City’s landscaping and screening requirements for tree planting. 3. Tree Replacement: The applicant’s landscape plan includes 25 new trees, for a total of 50.5 caliper inches. The required screen area adjacent the single family homes, north of the parking lot, will be planted with four evergreens and three ornamental trees, in addition to shrubs and seed or sod. These plantings will be located in between existing trees that are being preserved. No trees are proposed in front of the building or in front of the south parking lot, adjacent Maplewood Drive. The tree planting meets the City’s tree replacement requirements but may not meet the City’s landscaping and screening requirements. 4. Tree Replacement Recommendations: a. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant must submit the following: 1) Landscape Plan: A revised landscape plan showing additional trees or screening north of the parking lot to meet the City’s screening requirements. Additionally, the applicant should add trees in front of the building and south parking lot, adjacent Maplewood Drive. 2) Tree Protection Plan: A tree protection plan that identifies how trees being preserved near the development will be protected per the City’s tree ordinance and standards. 3) Surety: Submit a cash escrow or letter of credit to cover the landscaping requirements. Wetland: 1. Wetland Ordinance: There is a Manage B wetland located in the center of the parcel. The City’s wetland ordinance requires a 50-foot minimum and 75-foot average wetland buffer. The wetland ordinance allows flexibility in instances where, because of the unique physical characteristics of a specific parcel of land, the averaging of buffer width for the entire parcel may be necessary to allow for the reasonable use of the land during a development or construction project. In such cases decreasing the minimum buffer width will be compensated for by increased buffer widths elsewhere in the same parcel to achieve the required average buffer width. Averaging is allowed based on an assessment of the following: a. Undue hardship would arise from not allowing the average buffer, or would otherwise not be in the public interest. b. Size of parcel. CDRB Packet Page Number38 of 59 E1, Attachment 12 c. Configuration of existing roads and utilities. d. Percentage of parcel covered by wetland. e. Configuration of wetlands on the parcel. f. Averaging will not cause degradation of the wetland or stream. g. Averaging will ensure the protection or enhancement of portions of the buffer which are found to be the most ecologically beneficial to the wetland or stream. h. A wetland buffer mitigation plan is required for construction of development projects that will require averaging. In reviewing the mitigation plan, the city may require one or more of the following actions: 1) Reducing or avoiding the impact by limiting the degree or amount of the action, such as by using appropriate technology. 2) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the buffer. 3) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by prevention and maintenance operations during the life of the actions. 4) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute buffer land at a two-to-one ratio. 5) Monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures. 6) Where the city requires restoration or replacement of a buffer, the owner or contractor shall replant the buffer with native vegetation. A restoration plan must be approved by the city before planting. 7) Any additional conditions required by the applicable watershed district and/or the soil and water conservation district shall apply. 8) A wetland or buffer mitigation surety, such as a cash deposit or letter of credit, of 150 percent of estimated cost for mitigation. The surety will be required based on the size of the project as deemed necessary by the administrator. Funds will be held by the city until successful completion of restoration as determined by the city after a final inspection. Wetland or buffer mitigation surety does not include other sureties required pursuant to any other provision of city ordinance or city directive. 2. Wetland Impacts: The development will have grading to within 50 feet along the eastern edge of the Manage B wetland. The entire western edge of the wetland will remain undisturbed allowing for wetland buffer averaging. Wetland buffer CDRB Packet Page Number39 of 59 E1, Attachment 12 averaging is being requested due to the percentage of parcel covered by wetland and the configuration of the wetland on the parcel. 3. Wetland Buffer Recommendations: a. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant must submit the following: 1) Wetland Buffer Averaging Plan: A wetland buffer averaging plan identifying where the wetland buffer will be increased on the western side of the wetland to ensure mitigation of the averaged 50-foot buffer encroachment on the eastern side of the wetland. Since the development will take place along the entire eastern side of the wetland (approximately 780 feet), the required averaging on the western side should be 780 x 25 (buffer encroachment) = 19,500 square feet of preserved buffer on the western side of the wetland. 2) Utility and Grading Plans: The utility plan shows storm and sanitary sewer lines being bored under the wetland and wetland buffer. The applicant must supply detailed utility and grading plans for these areas to ensure there is no impact to the wetland and wetland buffer. 3) Wetland Buffer Mitigation: A wetland buffer mitigation plan showing repair, rehabilitation, or restoration of the 50-foot wetland buffer located on the eastern edge of the wetland. Mitigation should include removal of invasive species and planting of native plants within the buffer. 4) Landscape Plan: The landscape plan appears to add turf or seed within the 50-foot wetland buffer located on the east side of the wetland, adjacent the development. The applicant must supply a detailed landscape plan to ensure there is no impact to the wetland buffer. 5)Wetland Buffer Easement: An easement over the 50-foot wetland buffer on the eastern side of the wetland, and over the increased wetland buffer on the western side of the wetland. The easement will be recorded with the County and will identify that no mowing, grading, or building is allowed within the wetland buffer. . 4) Wetland Buffer Sign Plan: A wetland buffer sign plan showing the location of wetland buffer signs on the survey along the edge of the buffers that specify that no building, mowing, cutting, grading, filling or dumping be allowed within the buffer. 5) Wetland Buffer Sign Installation: Install the city wetland buffer signs that specify that no building, mowing, cutting, grading, filling or dumping be allowed within the buffer. CDRB Packet Page Number40 of 59 E1, Attachment 12 6) Maintenance Agreement: Sign a wetland buffer mitigation agreement with the City requiring that the applicant establish and maintain the required mitigation within the buffer for a three-year period. 7) Surety: A cash escrow or letter of credit to cover 150 percent of the wetland buffer mitigation. The City will retain the surety for up to three years as outlined in the maintenance agreement to ensure the wetland buffer mitigation is established and maintained. Infiltration Basin: 1. Infiltration Basins Proposed: There is a large infiltration basin proposed on the south side of the parcel. 2. City Infiltration Basin Planting Requirements: Large infiltration basins will ideally be planted with deep-rooted native plants. The City requires a portion of the basin to be planted rather than seeded. Using plants rather than seeds hastens establishment and provides a better chance of successful establishment. Basin bottoms and lower elevations almost never establish successfully from seed since the seed is washed away when stormwater flows into the basin. 3. Infiltration Basin Recommendations: a. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the infiltration basin, including a list of species, container size, spacing, and quantities to be approved by City staff. b. For any area using a native seed mix provide information on maintenance for planting year and years two and three, addressing what maintenance activities will be required and what entity (developer, owner, etc.) will take on this responsibility. c. A joint stormwater maintenance agreement shall be prepared and signed by the owner for the proposed infiltration basins. The Owner shall submit a signed copy of the joint stormwater maintenance agreement with the RWMWD to the City. CDRB Packet Page Number41 of 59 This page intentionally left blank CDRB Packet Page Number43 of 59 E2 COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Meeting Date September 15, 2020 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Design Review, Raising Canes, 3065 White Bear Avenue North Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action:ResolutionOrdinanceContract/AgreementProclamation Policy Issue: Ben Johnson, of Kimley-Horn and on behalf of Raising Canes, is proposing to redevelop 3065 White Bear Avenue – the existing site of a jewelry store. The proposed redevelopment consists of demolishing the existing building and constructing a 3,736-square-foot Raising Cane’s restaurant, associated parking, landscaping, utilities, and stormwater management system. The restaurant is an approved use for this site but the design of the building and site needs to be reviewed and approved by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board. Recommended Action: Motion to approve a resolution for design review for project plans date-stamped August 27, 2020, for the restaurant building to be constructed at 3065 White Bear Avenue. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0. Financingsource(s):Adopted BudgetBudget ModificationNew Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Financial Sustainability Integrated Communication Targeted Redevelopment Operational Effectiveness Community Inclusiveness Infrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on September 1, 2020. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is October 31, 2020. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. CDRB Packet Page Number42 of 59 E2 Background: Design Review Site Plan The applicant seeks to redevelop an existing parcel located at the northwest corner of the intersection of White Bear Avenue and Woodlyn Avenue. The site consists of an existing jewelry store and is northeast of the Maplewood Mall. The site has shared access with adjacent properties and underlying agreements with the adjacent properties to access the mall ring road. The site is encumbered by an existing overhead transmission line which forces buildings to be constructed on the south side of the site. The existing building is built outside of this easement, and the new building will also be constructed outside of the easement. There is an existing gas line that serves Maplewood mall that also runs through the site, and is proposed to remain. The proposed building meets the 30-foot setback requirement from White Bear Avenue. The existing site has paved impervious surfaces within the five-foot parking lot setback on the west side of the site which will be maintained in the proposed conditions. The required five-foot minimum setbacks will be maintained on the east and south property lines. The city does not have any specific drive through requirements. Building Elevations The height of the building is 23’ 6” feet – at its highest point. The exterior of the building will be comprised of brick facades, cement and metal panels and black anodized window trim. Applicant shall be required to submit for staff approval the elevations for the proposed trash enclosure on the north side of the site. Landscaping The applicant’s plans identify the removal of three significant trees equaling 46 diameter inches. The city’s tree preservation ordinance requires that 36.8 caliper inches of trees be replaced, or 18 2-caliper inch trees. The landscape plan calls for 14 new trees to be planted, for a total of 27 caliper inches. The applicant must either submit a revised landscape plan that shows four additional 2- caliper inch trees planted on the site or pay into the city’s tree fund. In addition to the trees, the applicant is proposing numerous shrubs and perennials around the proposed building. . Parking The city’s zoning ordinance states restaurants must provide one parking space for every 50 square feet of floor area devoted to patron use. Approximately 1,500 square feet of the proposed building would be dedicated to patron use which requires the applicant to provide 30 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing 33 parking spaces. Lighting The applicant’s submitted photometric plan meets all city requirements. Department Comments Engineering Please see Jon Jarosch’s engineering report, dated September 4, 2020, attached to this report. CDRB Packet Page Number44 of 59 E2 Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 1.02 acres Existing Land Use: Retail Building Surrounding Land Uses North: Retail Building East: White Bear Avenue and Retail and Restaurant Buildings South: Woodlynn Avenue and Restaurant Buildings West: Retail and Restaurant Buildings Planning Existing Land Use: Mixed-Use - Community Existing Zoning: BC – Business Commercial Attachments: 1. Design Review Resolution 2. Overview Map 3. 2040 Future Land Use Map 4. Zoning Map 5. Applicant’s Narrative 6. Site Plan 7. Landscape Plan 8. Building Elevations 9. Jon Jarosch’s Engineering Report, dated September 4, 2020 10. Applicant’s Plans (separate attachment) CDRB Packet Page Number45 of 59 E2, Attachment 1 DESIGN REVIEW RESOLUTION Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Ben Johnson, of Kimley-Horn and on behalf of Raising Canes, has requested approval of site and design plans for a restaurant project. 1.02 The property is located at 3065 White Bear Avenue and is legally described as: That part of Lot 15, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the North line of said lot distant 167.00 feet Westerly of the Northeast corner; thence Southerly, at a right angle to said North line, to the Southerly line and there terminating. Also, the North 20.00 feet of said lot lying Westerly of the above-described line. Together with the benefit of a perpetual nonexclusive easement for the pedestrian and motor vehicular traffic upon the following described property. That property described as the Ring Road in the Operating Agreement dated December 29, 1972, and recorded January 12, 1973, as Document No. 1846579 as amended and restated by Amended and Restated Operating Agreement dated October 21, 1998, field November 12, 1998, as Document No. 3099907. Together with the benefit of access easement as described in Exhibit 8, Item C of Warranty Deed filed March 16, 1979, as Document No. 20.35494. Abstract Property 1.03 On September 15, 2020, the community design review board reviewed this request. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information to the community design review board. The community design review board considered all of the comments received and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into this resolution. Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and CDRB Packet Page Number46 of 59 E2, Attachment 1 the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. Community Design Review Board Action. 3.01.1 The above-described site and design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site and design plans date-stamped August 18, 2020. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3. Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated September 4, 2020. 4. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 5. All signs must meet the requirements of the city’s sign ordinance. Freestanding or monument signs shall be designed to be consistent with the project’s building materials and colors. 6. The factory finish color of the roof-top units shall match the color of the roof. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a. The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. b. Submit to staff a copy of the executed cross-access easement agreement allowing access to the mall ring road. c. Submit to staff elevations for the trash enclosure. 10. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lots and driveways. c. Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. CDRB Packet Page Number47 of 59 E2, Attachment 1 d.Install all required outdoor lighting. 11. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 12. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. __________ by the Community Design Review Board of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on September 15, 2020. CDRB Packet Page Number48 of 59 E2, Attachment 2 Raising Cane's Restaurant - 3065 White Bear Avenue August 21, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend ! I 0240 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number49 of 59 E2, Attachment 3 Raising Cane's Restaurant - 3065 White Bear Avenue August 21, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Future Land Use - 2040 Mixed-Use - Community Commercial P 0240 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number50 of 59 E2, Attachment 4 Raising Cane's Restaurant - 3065 White Bear Avenue August 21, 2020 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Zoning Planned Unit Development (pud) Business Commercial (bc) Shopping Center (sc) P 0240 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County CDRB Packet Page Number51 of 59 E2, Attachment 5 To:Michael Martin City of Maplewood From:Ben Johnson, P.E. Kimley-Horn Date:August 21, 2020 Subject:MaplewoodSubmittal 3065 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood, MN INTRODUCTION seeks to redevelop anexisting parcel located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of White Bear Avenue and WoodlynAvenue. The site consist of an existing jewelry store and is northeast of the MaplewoodMall. The site has shared access with adjacent properties and underlying agreements with the adjacent Mall properties.The proposed redevelopment consists of demolishing the existing site and constructing a,associated parking, landscaping, utilities, and stormwater management system. The restaurant is planned to open September of 2021.The total property area is 1.07 acres, but when described less for right-of-way purposes, the property is 1.00acres.This narrative ismeant to provide background on the proposed use as part of the Community Design Review Board Application BUILDING OPERATIONS Building Size: 3,736square feet Type of Business/Activity: restaurantwith drive-thru Expected Activities on the Site: fast-casual restaurant with associated drive-thru and parking, landscaping, utilities, and stormwater management system Number of Employees-Initial:13 per shift with a total of approximately 50(settles in at apx 8- 12 per shift after honeymoon period) Max. Number of Anticipated Customers/Meals:1300 per day Hours of Operation: Sunday through Thursday: 10 a.m. 12 a.m.; Friday and Saturday: 10 a.m. 12a.m. Parking: 33parking stalls are being provided for customer and employee parking EXISTING CONDTIONS The proposed site is within the Business Commercial district and the property has some overall agreements with the Maplewood Mall. The site is encumbered by an existing overhead transmission line which limits the portion of the property where buildings can be constructed. The existing building is built outside of this easement, and the new building will also be constructed outside of the easement. There is an existing gas line that serves Maplewood mall that also runs through the site, and is proposed to remain. SUMMARY Proposed Use The proposed development will only slightly differ in proposed use from the PD site plan. We are proposing a fast-casual restaurant with a small patio in lieu of a sit-down restaurant. CDRB Packet Page Number52 of 59 E2, Attachment 5 Site Plan The site plan is a permitted use in theBusinessCommercial district. The existing site has paved in the proposed conditions. Five foot minimum setbacks will be maintained on the east and south property lines. Benefits of the Proposed Use toadjacent properties and the mall. It will increase the tax-base by providing a high-quality business in a place where there is currently a jewelry store. Rof designing and building high-quality restaurants. Building materials are of a higher grade than typical fast-casual restaurants. The landscaping is above and beyond code requirements with the intent to enhance the apositive experience for its customers. with a variety of local schools, sports teams, community organizations, etc. for fundraising and other ruly being a part of the community. stormwater runoff rate control and water qua and sanitary services. This provides additional treatment and operation funds for the City systems. The proposed restaurant will be an asset to the community by establishing an attractive and popular restaurant, supporting community organizations, increasing customer traffic to the existing areashops, and expanding tax base and jobs. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 612-326-9506, or by email at Benjamin.johnson@kimley-horn.com. Sincerely, Benjamin R. Johnson, P.E. CDRB Packet Page Number53 of 59 E2, Attachment 6 www.adaarchitects.cc Phone (216) 521-5134 Fax (216) 521-4824 17710 Detroit Avenue Lakewood, Ohio 44107 ARCHITECTS, INC. 8.20.20 7.10.2020171 PLAN SHEET NO. SD-1 Restaurant Support Office MAPLEWOOD, MN RESTAURANT RAISING CANE'S DATETYPE 6800 Bishop Road, Plano, TX 75024 SCHEMATIC SITE Tele: 972-769-3100 Fax: 972-769-3101 #123456789 10 JOB NO. SHEET REVISIONS DATE: STORE: all common law, statutory and other reserved rights,completion of this project by others without ADA's priorwritten consent. Any unauthorized use of this Instrument ofto ADA. ADA makes no warranties, express or implied, of project and is not intended for any other use. ADA retainsincluding copyrights. This Instrument of Service shall notbe used on other projects, for additions to this project or forService shall be at the User's sole risk and without liabilitymerchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. E V A R A E B E T I H W PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" N RESTRICTIONRESTRICTION BLDG HTNO BLDG HT T T N Y N E " A 0E N - 'W A M 1 H ME 1 G S RI A E H OH ELEC EASEMENT E P PROPOSEDPYLON SIGN KC AB TE" S G" NI-0 DLI' UB 5 '03 0 NOT ALLOWED TOBUILD IN THISSETBACK - E ' P A C S 4 D N A 1L 20'-0" K C A B T E S 30'-0" v . A - F . V - S 1 S P S E O 20'-0"24'-0"20'-0" P R 7'-1 1/2" Y G T 6 O V 3 T 20'-0"24'-0"A 7 , O N 3 R P 20'-0" 4'-0" 10'-0"10'-0" E 30' BUILDING SETBACK V A 30'-0" " 2 / N 1 4 - ' 2 N " 10'-0" 1 0 - ' 4 2 20' BUILDING SETBACK Y 4'-0" L TYP. D 20'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" O O W RESTAURANT ACAPULCO MEXICAN Received on August 27, 2020 by City of Maplewood CDRB Packet Page Number54 of 59 E2, Attachment 7 Tele: 972-769-3100 Fax: 972-769-3101 www.adaarchitects.cc 6800 Bishop Road, Plano, TX 75024 Phone (216) 521-5134 Fax (216) 521-4824 17710 Detroit Avenue Lakewood, Ohio 44107 Restaurant Support Office 08/21/2020 L1.0 PLAN SCHEME: B RESTAURANT VERSION: NKLR 1.0 RESTAURANT #C0605 CDRB SUBMITTAL RAISING CANE'S DATETYPE PROTOTYPE: P1-S-V-K+ 8/21/20CDRB SUBMITTAL MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 LANDSCAPE #123456789 10 3065 WHITE BEAR AVE. NORTHSUBMITTAL DATE:JOB NO.SHEET NO. SHEET REVISIONS STORE: project and is not intended for any other use. ADA retainsall common law, statutory and other reserved rights,including copyrights. This Instrument of Service shall notbe used on other projects, for additions to this project or forcompletion of this project by others without ADA's priorwritten consent. Any unauthorized use of this Instrument ofService shall be at the User's sole risk and without liabilityto ADA. ADA makes no warranties, express or implied, ofmerchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. ENGINEER INFORMATION: SPACING A SIZESIZESIZESIZESIZESPACING30" OC30" o.c. 18" O.C.18" o.c.18" O.C.18" o.c. CALCALCALSPACINGSPACINGSIZE #1 CONT.#1 CONT. CONTCONTCONTCONTCONTCONT SOD (TYP.)CLARITY. INSTALL LATERALS IN ONE SLEEVEAND SIZE SLEEVE ACCORDINGLY (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)IRRIGATION PIPE SLEEVING SHOWN FOR ABCDE LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES COMMON NAMECOMMON NAMECOMMON NAMECOMMON NAMECOMMON NAMECOMMON NAMENORTHWIND SWITCH GRASS APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)TYPICAL PIPE SLEEVE FOR IRRIGATION PIPE.SLEEVING MATERIAL. EXTEND SLEEVES 18 EDGER (TYP.)PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40PIPE SLEEVE SIZE SHALL ALLOW FORIRRIGATION PIPING AND THEIR RELATEDCOUPLINGS TO EASILY SLIDE THROUGHINCHES BEYOND EDGES OF PAVING FORCONSTRUCTION. TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED: 36.8 CAL. IN.TREE MITIGATION PROVIDED: 26 CAL. IN. = (3 CONIFEROUS TREES * 2.5) + (9 ORNAMENTAL TREES * 1.5) + (2 OVERSTORY TREES *2.5) LANDSCAPE SUMMARY BOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEBOTANICAL NAME LANDSCAPE LEGEND QTYQTYQTYQTYQTYQTY CODEAUP3PINUS NIGRAAUSTRIAN PINEB & B6` HT.CODEJTL5SYRINGA RETICULATAJAPANESE TREE LILAC CLUMPB & B6` HT.CODEABM2ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE`AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEB & B2.5" CAL.CODESPJ10JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SPARTAN`SPARTAN JUNIPER#5 CONT.4` O.C.CODEANH12HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE`ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA#5 CONT.4` O.C.AWS20SPIRAEA X BUMALDA `ANTHONY WATERER`ANTHONY WATERER SPIRAEA#5 CONT.4` O.C.CODE PRC4MALUS IOENSIS `PRAIRIE ROSE`PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLEB & B1.5" CAL.BCJ9JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS `BLUE CHIP`BLUE CHIP JUNIPER#5 CONT.4` O.C.GOJ7JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER#5 CONT.4` O.C.MDJ4JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM `MEDORA`MEDORA JUNIPER#5 CONT.4` O.C.MUG31PINUS MUGO `WHITE BUD`WHITE BUD MUGO PINE#5 CONT.3` O.C.DBB3EUONYMUS ALATUS `FIRE BALL`FIRE BALL BURNING BUSH#5 CONT.5` O.C.GVB9BUXUS X `GREEN VELVET`GREEN VELVET BOXWOOD#3 CONT.4` O.C.LDN19PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` TMLITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK#5 CONT.3` O.C.BES77RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN#1 CONT18" OC18" o.c.BJD152HEMEROCALLIS X `BAJA`BAJA DAYLILY#1 CONT.18" O.C.18" o.c.FRG26CALAMAGROSTIS ARUNDINACEA BRACHYTRICHAKOREAN FEATHER REED GRASSKFG21CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS#1 CONTNWG88PANICUM VIRGATUM `NORTH WIND` NORTH PLANT SCHEDULE CONIFEROUS TREEORNAMENTAL TREEOVERSTORY TREECONIFEROUS SHRUBS DECIDUOUS SHRUBSPERENNIALS Received on August 27, 2020 by City of Maplewood E U N E V A R A E B E T I H W B A D D A B 2 - MDJ 8 - MUGA 16 - KFG 12 - BESD 7 - GOJ 6 - BCJ EXISTING MALLMONUMENT SIGN 14 - FRG B 1 - JTL53 - BJD 2 - MDJ 1 - JTL 5 - ANH 27 - BJD E D 2 - PRC10 - AWS 19 - BJD 7 - SPJ 8 - MUG B 5 - LDN1 - ABM E A 6 - BES7 - BES E U V N BA9 - GVB 7 - LDN E N V A 7 - LDN N N 3 - ANH 38 - NWG B Y 2 - PRC 5 - BJD L 10 - AWS 12 - FRG D 3 - BCJ5 - MUG4 - ANH 1 - JTL 36 - BJD D 1 - ABM 13 - BES O O 12 - BJD W T D 1 - JTL 1 - JTL5 - MUG 25 - BES 3 - AUP 50 - NWG 3 - SPJ 3 - DBB 5 - KFG 5 - MUG 14 - BES B D CDRB Packet Page Number55 of 59 E2, Attachment 8 www.adaarchitects.cc Phone (216) 521-5134 Fax (216) 521-4824 17710 Detroit Avenue Lakewood, Ohio 44107 ARCHITECTS, INC. 8.20.20 7.10.2020171 SHEET NO. EL-1 Restaurant Support Office MAPLEWOOD, MN RESTAURANT SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS RAISING CANE'S DATETYPE 6800 Bishop Road, Plano, TX 75024 Tele: 972-769-3100 Fax: 972-769-3101 1 #23456789 10 JOB NO. SHEET REVISIONS DATE: STORE: project and is not intended for any other use. ADA retainsall common law, statutory and other reserved rights,including copyrights. This Instrument of Service shall notbe used on other projects, for additions to this project or forcompletion of this project by others without ADA's priorwritten consent. Any unauthorized use of this Instrument ofService shall be at the User's sole risk and without liabilityto ADA. ADA makes no warranties, express or implied, ofmerchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. Received on August 27, 2020 by City of Maplewood CDRB Packet Page Number56 of 59 E2, Attachment 9 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: Raising Cane’s PROJECT NO: 20-26 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Assistant City Engineer DATE: 9-4-2020 PLAN SET: Civil Plans dated 8-21-2020 REPORTS: Storm Water Management Report – Dated 8-21-2020 The applicant is proposing to construct a new Raising Cane’s restaurant at the 3065 White Bear Avenue north. In order to accommodate the new restaurant, an existing jewelry store will be demolished. The applicant is requesting a review of the current design. As the amount of disturbance on this site is greater than 0.5 acre, the applicant is required to meet the City’s stormwater quality, rate control, and other stormwater management requirements. The submitted stormwater management plan depicts the project meeting the City’s requirements via the use of an underground infiltration system. It appears from the information submitted that the proposed improvments meet the City’s stormwater management requirements. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents for final review. The following are engineering review comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Drainage and Stormwater Management 1) The project shall be submitted to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) for review, as the project is very near the threshold which triggers RWMWD’s requirements. All conditions of RWMWD shall be met. A copy of the project’s RWMWD permit (if necessary) shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2) The applicant shall submit a copy of the geotechnical information utilized to establish infiltration rates in the stormwater management report. 3) Emergency overland overflows shall be identified on the plans for the underground infiltration system. 4) The 100-Year high-water-level shall be shown on the plans for the underground stormwater system. CDRB Packet Page Number57 of 59 E2, Attachment 9 Grading and Erosion Control 5) All slopes shall be 3H:1V or flatter. 6) Inlet protection devices shall be installed on all existing and proposed onsite storm sewer until all exposed soils onsite are stabilized. 7) Adjacent streets and parking areas shall be swept as needed to keep the pavement clear of sediment and construction debris. 8) All pedestrian facilities shall be ADA compliant. 9) A copy of the project SWPPP and NDPES Permit shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) The total grading volume (cut/fill) shall be noted on the plans. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 11) The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project. 12) Insulation shall be considered at all points where the storm sewer crosses the potable water service. 13) Modifications to the potable water system shall be reviewed and approved by Saint Paul Regional Water Services. All requirements of SPRWS shall be met. Other 14) All project improvements, including plantings, within the overhead electric easement shall be reviewed and approved by Xcel Energy. 15) A sidewalk connection shall be provided between the Maplewood Mall entrance drive and the proposed building. 16) The plans shall be signed by a professional engineer currently licensed in the State of Minnesota. 17) A right-of-way permit shall be obtained from Ramsey County for any work done within County right-of-way along White Bear Avenue. CDRB Packet Page Number58 of 59 E2, Attachment 9 18) A cross-access agreement shall be established to accommodate the ingress and egress between the various parcels utilizing the access drive on this property. A copy of this agreement shall be provided to the City. 19) The Owner shall submit a signed copy of the joint storm-water maintenance agreement being prepared for the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (if RWMWD requirements are triggered) to the City. If RWMWD requirements are not triggered, a stormwater maintenance agreement between the owner and City shall be prepared and signed. 20) The applicant shall satisfy the requirements of all other permitting agencies. Please provide copies of other required permits and approvals. Public Works Permits The following permits are required by the Maplewood Public Works Department for this project. The applicant should verify the need for other City permits with the Building Department. 21) Grading and erosion control permit 22) Storm Sewer Permit 23) Sanitary Sewer Permit - END COMMENTS - CDRB Packet Page Number59 of 59