Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-02-24 City Council Workshop PacketPLEASE NOTE START TIME AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL MANAGER WORKSHOP 6:00 P.M. Monday, February 24, 2020 City Hall, Council Chambers A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Pedestrian Crossing Policy 2. Rental Licensing Program Update 3. 2021-2025 CI P Preview F. ADJOURNMENT RULES OF CIVILITY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OUR COMMUNITY Following are rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Speak only for yourself, not for other council members or citizens - unless specifically tasked by your colleagues to speak for the group or for citizens in the form of a petition. Show respect during comments and/or discussions, listen actively and do not interrupt or talk amongst each other. Be respectful of the process, keeping order and decorum. Do not be critical of council members, staff or others in public. Be respectful of each other's time keeping remarks brief, to the point and non -repetitive. THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK E1 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT Meeting Date February 24, 2020 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Steven Love, Public Works Director / City Engineer PRESENTER: Steven Love AGENDA ITEM: Pedestrian Crossing Policy Action Requested: ❑ Motion ✓ Discussion ❑ Public Hearing Form of Action: ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Contract/Agreement ❑ Proclamation Policy Issue: City staff and the City's consultant, S.E.H., have developed a draft crossing policy for determining when and where application of treatment crossings should be utilized. The Public Works Director and the City's consultant will give a presentation on the proposed crossing policy and are looking for feedback from City Council. Recommended Action: No formal action is required at this time. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? ✓ No ❑ Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0.00 Financing source(s): ❑ Adopted Budget ❑ Budget Modification ❑ New Revenue Source ❑ Use of Reserves ❑ Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: ❑ Financial Sustainability ❑ Integrated Communication ❑ Targeted Redevelopment ✓ Operational Effectiveness ✓ Community Inclusiveness ❑ Infrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The Maplewood Crossing Policy provides guidance to ensure the consistent application and treatment of crossings for all users throughout the city. Background Pedestrian and bicycle crossings are an important part of the City's transportation system. The proposed crossing policy aims to establish guidelines for the consistent and equitable installation of crosswalks on roadways under the City's jurisdiction. Workshop Packet Page Number 1 of 53 E1 The proposed policy and review process is based on adherence with accepted guidelines, good engineering practice, and review of crash history. Many factors including the presence of trails or school crossings, the number of pedestrian/bicycle crossings, roadway geometry, and the volume and speed of traffic. The proposed policy is intended to be used as a decision making tool to identify where it is appropriate to install a marked crossing based on site-specific criteria and what treatments should be considered and used. Attachments 1. Maplewood's Crossing Policy — Draft 2. City of Maplewood Crossing Policy PowerPoint Presentation Workshop Packet Page Number 2 of 53 E1, Attachment 1 Maplewood Crossing Policy - DRAFT 2.24.2020 n PURPOSE Crossings are an integral part of our transportation infrastructure for those walking, biking and using wheelchairs. The Maplewood Crossing Policy provides guidance to ensure the consistent application and treatment of crossings throughout the city. To be effective and promote safety, marked crosswalks must be installed after careful consideration and review. The review shall be done with adherence to accepted guidelines and good engineering practice, including a review of crash history. This policy establishes the guidelines and considerations for the consistent and equitable installation of marked crosswalks from the date of the adoption of this policy. POLICY The City of Maplewood may consider the installation of marked crosswalks where there is substantial conflict between vehicular and pedestrian movements as an enhancement for crossings of roadways under the City's jurisdiction. Crosswalk installation shall be in accordance with State Law and the guidelines contained herein. AUTHORITY This policy is based on administrative implementation of policy and Minnesota State Statute 169. The policy is administered under the direction of the Director of Public Works and applies to roadways under the City's jurisdiction. COORDINATION Where the installation of marked crosswalks under consideration are on roadways outside the City's jurisdiction (e.g. County, State), the City will coordinate with the appropriate agency and review both City and agency standards. Where the installation of marked crosswalks being considered are adjacent to active transportation generators such as schools, housing developments or businesses, the City will coordinate with the entity to understand crossing needs. STATUTES MN Statute 169.011 -Subdivision 20. Crosswalk. "Crosswalk" means (1) that portion of a roadway ordinarily included with the prolongation or connection of the lateral lines of sidewalks at intersections; (2) any portion of a roadway distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface. MN Statute 169.21 - Subdivision 2. Rights in absence of signal. (a) Where traffic -control signals are not in place or in operation, the driver of a vehicle shall stop to yield the right-of- way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a marked crosswalk or at an intersection with no marked crosswalk. The driver must remain stopped until the pedestrian has passed the lane in which the vehicle is stopped. No pedestrian shall suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle which is so close that it is impossible for the driver to yield. This provision shall not apply under the conditions as otherwise provided in this subdivision. DEFINITIONS Equitable: The City shall consider equity when (1.) prioritizing crossing locations to be evaluated and (2.) the distribution of funds for crossing improvements. Areas with higher than average Environmental Justice (EJ) populations (i.e. youth, seniors, low-income and minority populations), proximity to schools or other senior/youth pedestrian generators, or a history of pedestrian or bicyclist crashes should be given priority. Resources such as the Environmental Protection Agency's EJ Screen may be used to identify EJ communities. Maplewood Crossing Policy - DRAFT 2.24.2020 Page 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 3 of 53 E1, Attachment 1 Uncontrolled Crossings: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) defines an uncontrolled crossing as "a pedestrian crossing location where sidewalks or designated walkways intersect a roadway at a location where no traffic control (i.e. traffic signal or STOP sign) is present. These common crossing types occur at intersections (where they may be marked or unmarked) and at non -intersection or midblock locations (where they must be marked as crossings)." Controlled Crossings: A controlled crossing is a pedestrian crossing at a location where traffic control (i.e. traffic signal or STOP sign) is present. WHEN TO INSTALL A CROSSWALK AND APPROPRIATE TREATMENTS Factors such as the presence of a regional trail or school crossing, the number of pedestrians (or bicyclists) crossing per hour (pph), roadway geometry, and the volume and speed of motorists impact not only the opportunity for crossing, but also motorist and pedestrian compliance and the safety of certain crossing treatments. The following guidelines are intended for use as a decision making tool to identify where it is appropriate to install a marked crossing based on site-specific criteria that effect the safety and necessity of a marked crossing. UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS The Uncontrolled Crossing Location Treatment Flowchart (Figure 1) represents up-to-date local and national safety best practices and federal and state guidance. If a marked crossing at an uncontrolled location is determined to be appropriate based on Figure 1, the Application of crash countermeasures by roadway feature table (Table 1) will be applied to determine the need for additional treatments such as in -roadway signs and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs). The uncontrolled crossing guidelines in Table 1 and Figure 1 are not intended for use at Roundabout Controlled Intersections, which should adhere to accepted roundabout design standards. CONTROLLED CROSSINGS Marked crosswalks should be installed at signalized intersections in accordance with traffic signal design. It is recommended to install marked crosswalks at intersection approaches controlled by STOP signs if any of the following apply to the crossing: School Crossing or Located in a School Zone - A school crossing is defined as a crossing location where ten or more student pedestrians per hour are crossing. A school zone is defined as a segment of street or highway that abuts school grounds where children have access to the roadway or where a school crossing is in place. Multi -use Trail Crossing - The City of Maplewood has several multi -use trails, including the Gateway State Trail Meets crossing volumes and vehicle volume thresholds - Crossing volumes of 60 or more pedestrians (or bicyclists) per hour during the peak hour are expected and vehicular daily volumes of 3,000 or more are expected to cross over the crosswalk. Young, elderly, and disabled pedestrians count 2x towards volume thresholds. If a marked crossing at a location controlled by a STOP sign is determined to be appropriate based on the above guidelines, a standard crosswalk marking should be installed at the crossing. If one approach to an alkway stop controlled intersection meets the criteria for a marked crosswalk, consider marking all approaches unless crossing is otherwise prohibited on an approach. This policy is based upon the review and compilation of crossing research and policies including, but not limited to the: MnDOTTechnical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01; FHWA Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossings; City of Boulder Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines; Portland Crosswalk Site Evaluation Guidelines; City of St. Paul Draft Pedestrian Crossing Site Evaluation Guidelines for Uncontrolled Locations. Maplewood Crossing Policy - DRAFT 2.24.2020 Workshop Packet Page Number 4 of 53 Page 2 Figure 1. Uncontrolled Crossing Location Treatment Flowchart No Action Recommended N Crossing serves transit stop or other noticeable, defined and regular crossing? (3) Y Consider installing "unmarked crossing facilitation"(4), subject to staff review/engineering judgment Remove sight distance obstructions or lower speed limit Not Feasible START Should a location have a marked crossing? ADT >_1,000 vpd? ro Hy E1, Attachment 1 School Crossing* or School Zone**? N I Y Meets min. crossing Multi -Use Path N 1 volume thresholds?(z) N Crossing? VA Nearest marked or Direct users to protected crossing >_ nearest marked or 350' away? N protected crossing Y NN1 Adequate stopping sight distance? (8x speed limit) Direct users to nearest marked or protected crossing Feasible (1) Exception to the 1,000 vpd min. roadway volume threshold maybe made for School Crossings* where the peak hour traffic exceeds 10% of the daily traffic (2) Minimum Crossing Volume Thresholds: 20 pedestrians/bicyclists per hour*** in any one hour, or 18 pedestrians/bicyclists per hour*** in any two hours, or 15 pedestrians/bicyclists per hour*** in any three hours * School Crossing defined as a crossing location where ten or more students per hour are crossing ** School Zone defined as a segment of street or highway that abuts school grounds where children have access to the roadway or where a school crossing is in place Maplewood Crossing Policy - DRAFT 2.24.2020 Y Y A marked crossing is recommended. See table 1 for details. *** Young, elderly, and disabled users count 2x towards volume thresholds (3) Refer to note 2 for guidance on reasonable volume thresholds (4) "Unmarked crossing facilitation" is any treatment that improves a user's ability to cross a roadway, short of the marked, signed and enhanced crossings detailed in Table 1. Installation of this type of facilitation is subject to engineering judgment and may include curb ramps and/ or a raised median refuge. However, no effort is made to attract users or recommend that they cross at this location. The treatments simply provide an improvement for a low volume crossing where pedestrians and bicyclists are already crossing and will like continue to cross. Page 3 Workshop Packet Page Number 5 of 53 E1, Attachment 1 Table 1. Application of crash countermeasures by roadway feature Source: Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations, FHWA,July 2018 (FHWA-SA-17-072). If this table is updated by FHWA, the most recent version should be utilized. Maplewood Crossing Policy - DRAFT 2.24.2020 Workshop Packet Page Number 6 of 53 Page 4 Posted Speed Limit and AADT Vehicle AADT <9,000 Vehicle AADT 9,000-15,000 Vehicle AADT >1 5,000 Roadway Configuration <30 mph 35 mph >_40 mph <30 mph 35 mph >_40 mph <30 mph 35 mph >_40 mph O 2 O OO O O O O O O (lanes 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 (1 lane in each direction) 7 910 0 7 9 0 0 7 9 7 9 0 O 2 3 O DO D3 DO DDO DO O O O4 3 lanes with raised median 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 (1 lane in each direction) 7 9 0 0 7 9 0 00 0 7 9,0 0 0 3 lanes w/o raised median O 2 3 O 0 O © O 3 O 0 0 © O 0 0 0 0 0 (1 lane in each direction with a 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 two-way left -turn lane) 7 9 7 9 0 7 9 0 0 0 7 9 0 0 O DO DO DDDO DDD O O O O O5 4+ lanes with raised median 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 (2 or more lanes in each direction) 7 8 9 7 8 9 8 O 7 8 9 O 8 O 8 0 0 8 01 8 0 8 O O ©(D DO ©O D(D DO ©O O 4+ lanes w/o raised median5 6 5 0 5 :I(D 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 5 p 5 Q (2 or more lanes in each direction) 10 7 8 9 7 8 91 8 0 7 8 9 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8_0 Given the set of conditions in a cell, 1 High -visibility crosswalk markings, parking restrictions on # Signifies that the countermeasure is a candidate crosswalk approach, adequate nighttime lighting levels, treatment at a marked uncontrolled crossing location. and crossing warning signs • Signifies that the countermeasure should always be 2 Raised crosswalk 3 Advance Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians sign considered, but not mandated or required, based upon and yield (stop) line engineering judgment at a marked uncontrolled crossing location. 4 In -Street Pedestrian Crossing sign O Signifies that crosswalk visibility enhancements should 5 Curb extension 6 Pedestrian refuge island always occur in conjunction with other identified countermeasures.* 7 Rectangular Rapid -Flashing Beacon (RRFB)** The absence of a number signifies that the countermeasure 8 Road Diet is generally not an appropriate treatment, but exceptions may 9 Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB)** be considered following engineering judgment. *Refer to Chapter 4, 'Using Table 1 and Table 2 to Select Countermeasures,' for more information about using multiple countermeasures. **It should be noted that the PHB and RRFB are not both installed at the some crossing location. This table was developed using information from: Zegeer, C.V., J.R. Stewart, H.H. Huang, P.A. Lagerwey, J. Feagones, and B.J. Campbell. (2005). Safety effects of marked versus unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations: Final report and recommended guidelines. FHWA, No. FHWA-HRT-04-100, Washington, D.C.; FHWA. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2009 Edition. (revised 2012). Chapter 4F, Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons. FHWA, Washington, D.C.; FHWA. Crash Modification Factors (CMF) Clearinghouse. hffp:/Avww.cmfcleoringhouse.org/, FHWA. Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System (EDSAFE). h?VA-vww.pedbikesafe.orcUPEDSAFE/, Neer, C., R. Srinivasan, B. Lan, D. Carter, S. Smith, C. Sandstrom, N.J. Thirsk, J. Neer, C. Lyon, E. Ferguson, R. Van Houten. NC RP Report 841: Development Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Transportation Research Board, and (2017). of Washington, D.C.; Thomas, Thirsk, and Zegeer. (2016). NCHRP Synthesis 498: Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.; and personal interviews with selected pedestrian safety practitioners. Maplewood Crossing Policy - DRAFT 2.24.2020 Workshop Packet Page Number 6 of 53 Page 4 00*10 "P '000#0 a (n (n 0 L. 0W-9 I -PA CD C14 CD 0 C14 0 C'4 T 2f, cu (D LU LL LU CIO 0-0 cn T 0 N _r_ 0 C) a) O 4-_+ M U O J 70 N O L- 0 U lw 4-1 M 0 L- C) C- o a U 0 - Workshop Packet Page Number 8 of 53 C`• C`• C`• N O � 7 I M U � o � 0-U) I 0) M a) U M M to O X CO 0� W Cn E1, Attachment 2 U O QL 0 a) 4-0 M a) i U 13 0 0 L- 0 U .0 N M •� O o � U 4- O m U) CL _U N a) M M E1, Attachment 2 U M O Q Q M U M N U O b Workshop Packet Page Number 9 of 53 'II S 4-1 N o L O Cn U) N E M 0'' 1 o J 3 � J U .� E1, Attachment 2 U M O Q Q M U M N U O b Workshop Packet Page Number 9 of 53 4-1 N N L Cn U) N E :> � J � .� N O — O .� w .U)C_�0 -a2 o��QCU U. E1, Attachment 2 U M O Q Q M U M N U O b Workshop Packet Page Number 9 of 53 M a� M L Workshop Packet Page Number 10 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 � U QL •i O4-0 M 70 4-0 a 70 U M .� T, o Workshop Packet Page Number 10 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 El, Attachment 2 Workshop Packet Page Number 11 of 53 U M U) a) 0� O 2 a () O N M O 4-1M Z T v M M U O J N U U M L- n N CO • Workshop Packet Page Number 12 of 53 z L6 0 � H Z� La CL Cr 0 IOL z W vi E1, Attachment 2 4-0 0 E 0— O W W E1, Attachment 2 ° 1113 13 ®0° m O7 M GO j;1 E j�ii �Ii O. dl Z3 00 ca wm Ca =0- 5 C 0) o u)wm 0 ^ 7 M O U 70 '�rrrr Z3 rrr 000000 O U sra• E1, Attachment 2 ° 1113 13 ®0° m O7 M GO j;1 E j�ii �Ii Z3 ca wm Ca =0- 5 C 0) o u)wm 0 ^ 7 M O U 70 Z3 0o 000000 O U > U > > O >S >, U) U 3: O U °� 0 0 Cnn E N E1, Attachment 2 ° 1113 13 ®0° m O7 M GO j;1 E j�ii �Ii Sz G Q co p U pp o U L Cn �U N ca a) U CU CU U) O o � U . . . . . . . . . . . . . Workshop Packet Page Number 13 of 53 ca wm a) — =0- 5 C 0) o u)wm 0 ^ 7 M O U 70 000000 > > > > > >S U U U U U U Sz G Q co p U pp o U L Cn �U N ca a) U CU CU U) O o � U . . . . . . . . . . . . . Workshop Packet Page Number 13 of 53 x M E a) 2: �-j M M 0- E 0 0 El, Attachment 2 Workshop Packet Page Number 14 of 53 IMEMMEMENNIMME IMMMEMMIMONIMEN 11MEMMMEMINIMMM INEMMENSINIMME IMMOMMMMINIMME INEMMEMENIMMIMM IMEMMEMERNIMMM INEMMEMMIMIMME IMEMMEMMINIMME IMEMMEMISIMEME IMEMMMMMINIMEN IMEMMEMEMMIMMM oa�� ■new Workshop Packet Page Number 14 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 Workshop Packet Page Number 15 of 53 V) C U CY)O (a L C cn 'Cj, �T 70� ca ' L O L i U N- La--+ CaL N i � 'N O O Cn O Q N 0) D 0 O L U N N (a N- N O M, cn U U'L U O (a L L (� U O N a) j N U�- -r- C: '� a) O -C N }' u) u) N cn a) 6- N E N 70 Cn +-j -r— U/ O a) O L N 0) /► za_ c� J Workshop Packet Page Number 15 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 Workshop Packet Page Number 16 of 53 U O n E1, Attachment 2 Workshop Packet Page Number 17 of 53 M 4-5 .Q O IZ- Q U) M E CU O) J Q CO � o ry a) m u) M c: a):3CO COX 0� N CO O 0O U M U U D� CO N M E1, Attachment 2 Workshop Packet Page Number 17 of 53 4-0 0 E 0- 0 W W U 0 n Ce Workshop Packet Page Number 18 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 D C Q E 0 N p 4- 0 N QEZ M 70 v Z Cn Workshop Packet Page Number 18 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 D C Q nC: W 0 O 70 O LL M ^—+ W L ^ ^W W W N >Q 2 LL Cn O O N M O L- C) U ^0^, `W`/ M E r�/A, VAI V I L WO Se ` V M U 20 4— J 0_0 0^ W, 4-j + 0— a Ui 4- Z) M }, Cn M W U) M — O min OU) 00— V-- OV-- U o o a o (SOUI5Swa uoIIIIMI aad SwS*jO uvwwad) KOW 4SRJO UOMSePad E1, Attachment 2 �.2 m �gma Sz a Q a a m a Cl Workshop Packet Page Number 19 of 53 ci a ■ A a 0 g a 0 C —n a a 0 oa � 6 � c _P O iy N = O P -1 i z o o a o (SOUI5Swa uoIIIIMI aad SwS*jO uvwwad) KOW 4SRJO UOMSePad E1, Attachment 2 �.2 m �gma Sz a Q a a m a Cl Workshop Packet Page Number 19 of 53 El, Attachment 2 �¥ 10 o c r CC \ @ / < ( — p / 2 0 \ \ \�2 f m — CO ® f a o (O u|SSoj D uql|m]ed Sagsi2 0 UO Seped) A2Id gSe]D UeUlSaP9d Workshop Packet Page Number 20 G 53 c@ c 2 5 < 0o CD / \ ;fco o � 2 _ � �@ _ C7. / $ 0 CO c a o 2 \vin 2 >\/$ƒ \ - _ < # $ 2 k / \r 0 M E1, Attachment 2 @.' 0 i O ^U i a L^ i C3 Qj a ^C-3) i O L O ,O C3 U O (nom J V C^3` ''n (i 0 V V b U E � U .. 0 � N O U p 7 • •A Mf^ •� •� •� 7 L G 0 VJ C O a Z VJ ^^,, W O � NCj) v d a m h 4-1 M U N to a--+ o a--+ C ^, L ffV^^ J ateZ �\ ^, d O ? N y Cn Q •r- 'R B., , i W E ,0) 6 Q m m p Q .L 4 �n m a � n m CD .Q •�C •L/ -tie- •1K •t/ •qC •ele- •qG •t< `y -0 N N } C _n a E CD V C L N d CD C N y a .m m .� .� •� �� `� •� a w t m H C O � C C .y O U c Q a y d U �- O � Y a m m � N •� = o G p LD O NC 6 0 h C E a)O 6 N m g A O O � L3 U U U L :2 m C ._ AD P U O` ry y 03 U O C Q� O 6 Y �, a O L m N N 2 x a o', E a 5 U v v m m a C"" E Cl. c a a c E1, Attachment 2 @.' 0 i O ^U i a L^ i C3 Qj a ^C-3) i O L O ,O C3 U O (nom J V C^3` ''n (i 0 V V b U � U .. 0 � N O Mf^ fQ VJ 7 L � Z VJ ^^,, W O � NCj) v 4-1 M U N to a--+ a--+ ^, L ffV^^ J ateZ �\ ^, W Cn Q •r- 'R B., , i W E ,0) Q U Q .L 4 �n Workshop Packet Page Number 21 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 Workshop Packet Page Number 22 of 53 O O� d J a) . � N y Qom._ w c � � O �o a o m N a P cnQq 00 1 itof u�i chi 3 n o v` a o vi cL- �" Z r o ,c m QOM C v -0�v p@ 42 O Q d bd CVi X.r 4 Q a A 0 N ci �' •� �° � m ° �T ny u n tA 2 f Vba Q 3 '� au 0r w cur C OCs n a� c •°`fie ��n �3l �� n�pp =i� �� P �ac Z5 CL M M C 5� �'� _:;;.z. '7 '7 mcwc •- °' Amo 3 u .G mo yr NO t o� �=== w i a s 'vii a o'.$ `a 3 o ar az -c� o_- ro'aC. o0 op r� 7 15 c c Z pU �y p C V C N N y �o -. a:.- Y. s C C 0 O u t14_ � � O � 1p ^ �0 d ., .f U .,. u, ✓ [V ' r o n o I.L C Q T 7 P oD u - G :., �, ,7: r. a P d O t r _ = O tz _N 5y o P Yn a 2 - d N z7 ry - d C .- Y .� Z, C -0_Q10 OCL d 'O p J, w 2- p u P P 0by P o KI tl a Oy Q0t a. T< gy�pp 6 4V C ] 2 O R .0T id E L J Q - GJ C -F N Tl R N O T O Cl"13 �A ..-• ,_ �. r _. J C V ",. _ U a+ 0 G P f = s L_ = O o c _ O T c T — }m x T Z _.n '� w ru E d p i p a. 'o v r - N U v u O ,. r ¢ °' c o ar v 3 ?L .0 a 3:m a P_ sCr o p c° n' - Workshop Packet Page Number 22 of 53 O O� d J a) . � Qom._ � � O Workshop Packet Page Number 22 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 d tl L n a a s io O O — 3 r a° ` tl to o 0 4 tl -_ m N amu o cu 2CL ro o v a a cau� D O 41 W i� N rc +0 N G d iq a N '� ei c C E d O u i�f1 Q N N N .G N al d o ai �W O C d CDrp of a! D� pylp E E G O d @ d C �d rNo O�Y G e d ' A N C Cj -8 � C 0 C O _ Na N ° O -O wO WG o E d aC c .� v m o -lc aF°1 a ° 33 a� C 0 '�- n° W ro as 7 y 3 eu •t =- _ _ G ° b0 m d a ei N ur 4 Gva 3 m op tl c>; E W a w o v o C l7 L _ d W y1 C M v N j6 d d, r ".: rt O o 0 a Na D! T It CL O n yfV n r. O ;r S7 N .0 LL. 77 epT�y 'IJ C+ '0 �. is ¢ .�.. '[7 v Ls y N 09 2 O 'p O L Q� 6? y„ C 7!rt Z i^ O 6 a'L.. �d a �,tl 27 ~ &L J M tl- �rL.p, C ¢b0 VI -p L7• Q ro �• b d no NvN vGi 2 au Cx�Ni 0 VauI .G O a Cro a .a.. °CIIee�� W, o n n0 om' C E m tl O uu • z yj a Zc --. 2 r °, t3 a iLn Q cL � �_ � � �u 3a •a Y o C `-� U -M.- - E -0- �i � y 7 o a� ii 'L7 G m w a i Dp .. C v' Q `. -� -_ O y _ U .�_ O 00 C > cNn tl w ?] ��il .6 tl O c W V3Ni ry d< O v O M N S 3 O N e d h Gam" V CJ HOo `O elNr 0 a 0- "d ._. 0- L cd V wod ° o—° a an �- '✓r tTl C o V !. ° ._ — R v 0. z O O� d Qom._ CU O Workshop Packet Page Number 23 of 53 \| \ ! \ & * 0 0 _a) C) . 0 0 n ® z z a l y r& � z z z )r ni-i 4 !� _0 0 0 _a) C) . 0 0 n Workshop Packet Page Number 24 of53 El, Attachment 2 § E1, Attachment 2 I Workshop Packet Page Number 25 of 53 o E aav av �v ovcD ua ti = m of CO - O� 'e 0 e L`' 0 e w ' � ® E e u� ^® �n ve Ln v; cr �n CO e a �.9 °° c MFE P e O' ® 'O 0'.0 0 0 d Q a Ln 1!] 0 M V] 0� ,C Y a : y c t, 5 -10 a n Q ale O Y s c--- a a d a � -Do D© -D© DOG� * o - �, S o r � v e de Q;e e e d� _ZE © L d� ©4b0: 1 0000 a�& a w o o (;,e v'0 v© vF15 o, N= F _ _ � n E v r a Ln In © v O cr n e a n e e n - c4 eq v o:7 �O n COD L �..- N Q ` a " it ¢o .,.® aU �'© 43JN R 'il M COY] P Q a [! P 0 3 s chi NOD J'52. N N O N C4 u1 a C4 H e@ n LO 40 O t• cp O n_ w $ a C o 3 Ey E �0} F] 0 vy -. `o .} 61 a EL s E o"" c�. o f o E o m c rE -05_F G@ og r�� 2 2 E ffi i �6 .ca y� E `E Sao Y -: L �y..[K m �m �mm cg c E in in corm inL epi a ,�+� �q SLYC7 � � Q }�s�_w I Workshop Packet Page Number 25 of 53 O O� � � O I Workshop Packet Page Number 25 of 53 E1, Attachment 2 9 We d yr r Ole, ,in wa a ■ F Q 1." c i r� �iitil�PEr$ilkkj'at c F R� I, till I � J 0 N M N U O a) a> > O F Q 0 0 � a 4) 0 M > M w C� x N M o M +►n Workshop Packet Page Number 26 of 53 4—+ M —0 na) W L. 4-0 U/ L K it M "a G1 E E U41 ++ +, H r .� UQ 0) U S 0 4Z y 0OG Q O p y LU n C) O Q U o OO x v � O u a O Op O + p c -I C L Al 0 Y O W QOi cc 'a Q) O � D � O 0 V O t CU J O O N i --I vi _ M of Q 0 L d 3 E Y_ G +' i Qj MY L7 M N 0) U V) W LU x O W a H U_ n N U 0 U Urz a° oCC > y o O 3 v) O t aJ c y -p G1 n v ,ao p Q M i `n 0 O pp i .0 7 Q U O 0 Qr > UO a Qj O U v zt� O S O r -I ri 0) 0 LU ♦'� c -I ateU } M C L Al °o cc+ H '� O U Ln C) a r•O N 4 t t_ Q v) Q U Y W a �' a, r dG MW' n. E1, Attachment 2 Workshop Packet Page Number 27 of 53 4-0 a) a) L. 4-0 w a) � � M H 4-0 M a) :3 C— a) � � � 9 A f 2 # _ c � E E o = J ƒ { E E E M41 � e � \ In < U } \ U \ 0 § 2 ~ 2 ■ i 2 \ C f E S § E ( \ > 90 = / § §.\ wU ) § C) < § \ } } \ / Workshop Packet Page Number 28 G 53 El, Attachment 2 \ �: . $ Y` %y. El, Attachment 2 CU � Seo L. CU n � � M 0) a) � 4-0 M C— � _M C— � � 0 U) Gi ( > C 2 — { E 41 g > o C:) 3§ w L o / z 2 5 s ) V( ° = ® &- S § k ( ra - 41= E E s> E Ln . S®\§ $ C:) ® \ / � U 2 \ ± E . x _ U \ e 2 \ E 0 5 - _ E j t\ E J = 2 >- °$ § J . L . § _ \ k ± Uƒƒ \ ± \_ / . 3 ( ._ > 0 \ S 0 3 T\ E U o _ 0 2 e e 2> \ 12 \7G z 'E m f 2 ��� i 5 2 § / . \ C t u .\ c .§ t ± 2 i \ o/ \> \ R G / / \ 7 \ \ / 2\\ g \ 2\ CL '7 3 c 2{ 2 2 2 \ / \ \ \ ( .0- / \ 2 > = e = » Qj.- 4-2 ® 4- C S 'E -3>@ E 5± 2 \ 2� ` /\ \E Ek / \Qj e o $ ° s = \ = E < 7 s ƒ 9 ).( �.x » ± E 7 / > > ± u \ o z / B !© ©® w . � \� !§ f » [ �w� \ \ El, Attachment 2 Workshop Packet Page Number 29 of 53 E2 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT Meeting Date February 24, 2020 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Jeff Thomson, Community Development Director PRESENTOR: Jeff Thomson, Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Rental Licensing Program Update Action Requested: ❑ Motion ✓ Discussion ❑ Public Hearing Form of Action: ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Contract/Agreement ❑ Proclamation Policy Issue: City staff will provide an update to City Council regarding the implementation of the city's rental housing licensing program. Recommended Motion: No action required. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? ✓ No ❑ Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0. Financing source(s): ❑ Adopted Budget ❑ Budget Modification ❑ New Revenue Source ❑ Use of Reserves ❑ Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: ❑ Financial Sustainability ❑ Integrated Communication ❑ Targeted Redevelopment ✓ Operational Effectiveness ❑ Community Inclusiveness ❑ Infrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The rental licensing program protects the public health, safety and welfare, maintains safe, secure and sanitary housing, and promotes neighborhood stability. Background In September 2019, the City Council adopted an ordinance adopting a rental housing licensing program which is effective in 2020. The purpose of the workshop is to update the city council on implementation of the licensing program, and receive any additional input and feedback. A44-mrhr",mnfc 1. Power Point Presentation Workshop Packet Page Number 30 of 53 V J M E2, Attachment 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 31 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 32 of 53 �I C _0 Q) a--+ Q) E Q) 17 CM TT Fq Q) Q) V Q) O a--+ Q) k M Ln Q) Q) WWI Q) • • • chi M O 0 E2, Attachment 1 O N ca O cn .� E O Q) M QL Q) Q) V V Q Workshop Packet Page Number 32 of 53 �I C _0 Q) a--+ Q) E Q) 17 CM TT Fq Q) Q) V Q) O a--+ Q) k M Ln Q) Q) WWI Q) • • • chi M O 0 E2, Attachment 1 a--+ ca O cn O M 17 Q)Q) Q) Q) V Q •> M O k i oc O o Workshop Packet Page Number 32 of 53 �I C _0 Q) a--+ Q) E Q) 17 CM TT Fq Q) Q) V Q) O a--+ Q) k M Ln Q) Q) WWI Q) • • • chi M O 0 E2, Attachment 1 j, , � 0- " " *-,- -, 0, 0 A� ca cn Q) Q) Q O k Q Q) Q) Q) Q) •� O a --i L� O Q) Q) Q) n Q) E O 0 V O U Q) _0 k C '> ca cn =3 w w j, , � 0- " " *-,- -, 0, 0 A� E2, Attachment 1 a a a r c u 0 C rer Q Ln cu a L- w LA CRa QE LA p tL F . U � L i -_ u E � � dam.• C QCL LAv E LO inCL L v 41 C. i V 0 Q s rla a ;n M Li Ln V Z7 L- Cn O ? OLn M L . Q C] ci � ro > ua D G E aJ Q P w i w� U a ami 44 0 m � CL a � 3: ate- 3.4 x v a E .MC 2 M a� cam. POO/V\E)IdL:)w Workshop Packet Page Number 33 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 POO/V\E) I d L:) H Workshop Packet Page Number 34 of 53 (� Q) � Q 73 O O U U ° o 4 C- Q) — a) V C6 4-j O C - O Q� M }' >1 a--+ V _� T O O Q) � \ c� C T O � POO/V\E) I d L:) H Workshop Packet Page Number 34 of 53 cn a -j Q) E Q) Q) k Q) V Q) Q O E V +� Q) Q) V +- M Q) O +-+ � M ca V ---j V i Q) O a) M O .� O Q) C V LU Q) Q) .5 E2, Attachment 1 POO/V\E)IdL:)w Workshop Packet Page Number 35 of 53 V) Q) Q � cn Q) ca O V Q) Q� E Q) > E Q Q) E Q) Q) '� O V Q>) ' o o > Q) Q) .� aj o I V � Q V LU Q) Q) .5 E2, Attachment 1 POO/V\E)IdL:)w Workshop Packet Page Number 35 of 53 Workshop Packet Page Number 36 of 53 O ' V (1) Q) Q) V V) V) O Q) 006 v O M 4-j O Un QM CiC V) cn Workshop Packet Page Number 36 of 53 a -j C- Q) E Q _O Q) Q) Q) V V tf E k Q) Q _M Q) V Q C 0 E2, Attachment 1 j, , � 0— " " *-,- -, 0, 0 A� O ' V (1) Q) Q Q V) V) Q) Q) v O M 4-j O Un a -j C- Q) E Q _O Q) Q) Q) V V tf E k Q) Q _M Q) V Q C 0 E2, Attachment 1 j, , � 0— " " *-,- -, 0, 0 A� E2, Attachment 1 OEM 17 a--+ LA Q) O N V) Q) a -j Q) n 0 .E M y - i _Q) 17 a--+ V) Q) O N M V O n +-j �V Q) n O N m N N N N •� O O C: N N N O a O Z, Q V 4-jQ� _ Q)rleOO a_+ E2, Attachment 1 OEM 17 a--+ LA Q) O N V) Q) a -j Q) n 0 .E M y - i _Q) 17 a--+ V) Q) O N M V O n +-j �V Q) n O N m N N N N O O O O N N N N POO/V\E)IdL:)w Workshop Packet Page Number 37 of 53 O T Workshop Packet Page Number 38 of 53 UO Q) Q) O N O N Q) Q) Q) a--+ Q) Q O Q) O a--+ =3 4-jJ Q) V C:T M O cn ryo Q) Q) (-)1 IL 0 Q O ---j � O �4UO OLn CD T � O O N Ln junp junp junp junp Q) Q) Q) Q) Q O V 4-jJ Q) — C M Q) Q ryo E2, Attachment 1 l" � 0- " " *-,- -, 0, 0 A� 0 T V) Q) E M X LU E2, Attachment 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 39 of 53 M M M M M M C) Q C) CDCD CD CD L Ln CD Ln -,;I lO (,D N N N r -I Awl:+ Awl:+ Awl:+ Awl:+ Q E 4-j 0 � 4 Q) CD 0 O 0 Un Q N � Workshop Packet Page Number 39 of 53 k;i"""" Workshop Packet Page Number 40 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 l" � 0— " " *-,- -, 0, 0 A� cn Q) O O C- Q) � O • _V Q Q V � Q) �� O (�CD O U N O O Q) Q) N O O NE O `L, u � E Q > V) O V) E O V c E El 0 _ cC [--cn Un k;i"""" Workshop Packet Page Number 40 of 53 E2, Attachment 1 l" � 0— " " *-,- -, 0, 0 A� E3 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT Meeting Date February 24, 2020 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman REPORT FROM: Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director PRESENTER: Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director Steve Love, Public Works Director AGENDA ITEM: 2021-2025 CIP Preview Action Requested: ❑ Motion ✓ Discussion ❑ Public Hearing Form of Action: ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Contract/Agreement ❑ Proclamation Policy Issue: Earlier this month the City received its 2020 allotment of Municipal State Construction Aid, which effectively eliminated the remaining deficit in the English/TH#36 Project Fund. This occasion is cause for celebration, as it represents a critical juncture in the City's future planning processes. Staff will present a preliminary preview of the City's debt and infrastructure improvement planning processes, and illustrate how this event impacts the outlook for the 2021-2025 capital improvement plan. Recommended Action: No action is required. This item is informational. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? ✓ No ❑ Yes, the true or estimated cost is N/A Financing source(s): ❑ Adopted Budget ❑ Budget Modification ❑ New Revenue Source ❑ Use of Reserves ❑ Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Financial Sustainability ✓ Integrated Communication ✓ Targeted Redevelopment Operational Effectiveness ✓ Community Inclusiveness ✓ Infrastructure & Asset Mgmt. Financial activities intersect with all areas of the strategic plan. Background Planning for the English/TH#36 project began in 2009 and expenses totaling $26.3M were incurred through 2019. The English/TH#36 project is the largest city project to date, and the City provided over $4M in revenue to finance the project. The remainder of the funding came from federal, state and local government sources. The city share of the project was much more than originally anticipated; consequently, the project fund has had a deficit balance since the beginning. Attachments 1. PowerPoint Workshop Packet Page Number 41 of 53 0. O ►7 Workshop Packet Page Number 42 of 53 0 N O N N LL E3, Attachment 1 LL M r E3, Attachment 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 43 of 53 LL r M L C W E3, Attachment 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 44 of 53 L.L E3, Attachment 1 es �gk M C) V .O L r M 2 C: LU Workshop Packet Page Number 45 of 53 CO W • 0.4 E3, Attachment 1 � CD �i N V*ZD QN Cj C M N • � %2 E r6 o .� U Q J V V Q E N LA O LF- L - � :�E N N +� Ln Q Q a - Ln o o 'V: N QJ a) Workshop Packet Page Number 46 of 53 Ln n V N Q •Q O Q N V Ln •� U L Q) +-j +-j 4-j �, V Q � V N Q Q O Q Q O O Q 00 00 N 00 00 Workshop Packet Page Number 46 of 53 E3, Attachment 1 0 u Workshop Packet Page Number 47 of 53 E3, Attachment 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 48 of 53 ern C 0 0 0 0 O N N I � N N 4--1 N 4-j � O � o N E 0 > z rn C) E 4� r.+ zo re E3. Attachment 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 49 of 53 0 0 0 0 r.+ zo �w A � I••�•I w O � : � N � O � M O l� O O O A FSI r.. O w Ct 0 O 0 OHO C1 00 l� O O M 01 k O N Ct �- N N N N N N N N Workshop Packet Page Number 49 of 53 L. V) QC: `� rl r E \W O C: V C — C LL. � V V t/1 W V) C: O 4-J 4J C: O U ca OL U G Ln E Ln Ln Ln Ln Q U N Q LL U f6 L L.L E3, Attachment 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 50 of 53 L O L- E3, Attachment 1 N O N O N O N Workshop Packet Page Number 51 of 53 E3, Attachment 1 r C: U -0* (n 112 0 0 N • I � N •N O c� N cn � Q 4) 0 0 0 r- �--' V Ln � •O O n t � � iii E3, Attachment 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 52 of 53 -0* (n 112 0 `�r�l° 4Q� o 0 0 w� � Q 0 0 0 0 r- 00 N Ln O O O n N N O O 00 IZI- qt Ln IZI- c -I MO -I Ln Ln IZI- N Ln O 00 00 c -I Ln r•I M c -I Ln I� 4 w — > C \ 3 rl O O Q �N•I N 4-JQ L7 '� a+ v OC fC m C U C v Q .0 > L C 0: N O W U O Can O O C C:H C � U d L/i J U m C Qj C � C m N � N LL N Qj U C i O N Can aJ 3 LL C QJ c/) N U N N ,C + i s a) a) c N N tw a, i 00 4-J Q QJ W t U +-+ is V JK ~ Z W F— U L ci L/) Workshop Packet Page Number 52 of 53 -0* 4Q� r-iLn � Q C) N N Ln N O a) N N N O O 00 IZI- LO Ln IZI- c -I O M Ln Ln N Ln N a) C Gl c -I Ln r•I M ~ H r•I w — Workshop Packet Page Number 52 of 53 -0* 4Q� r-iLn � Q C) N N N N X N E N\ M N a) C ate,+ N C N r•I M ~ H N w — > C \ 3 O Q �N•I .N 4-JQ L7 '� a+ v OC fC m C M C v Q .0 > .a C 0: N O W U O Q O C C:H � LL d L/i J 11 m W Workshop Packet Page Number 52 of 53 �J E3, Attachment 1 Workshop Packet Page Number 53 of 53