Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-01-21 CDRB Packet AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Tuesday,January 21, 2020 6:00P.M. Council Chambers -Maplewood City Hall 1830 County Road B East A.Call to Order B.Roll Call C.Approval of Agenda D.Approval of Minutes: 1.November 19, 2019 E.NewBusiness: 1.Menard Inc., 2280 Maplewood Drive a.Design Review and Lot Division Resolution 2.St. John’s HospitalComprehensive Sign Plan, 1575 Beam Avenue East 3.John Glenn Middle School,1560 County Road B East a.Design Review Resolution 4.Election of Officers(No Report) F.UnfinishedBusiness: G.Visitor Presentations: H.Board Presentations: I.Staff Presentations: J.Adjourn MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2019 6:00 P.M. A.CALL TO ORDER Acting Chairperson Ledvinacalled the meeting to order at6:00p.m. B.ROLL CALL Chairperson, Bill KempeAbsent Boardmember,Jason LamersAbsent Vice Chairperson,Matt LedvinaPresent Boardmember,Ananth ShankarPresent Boardmember,Bruce ThompsonPresent Staff Present:Michael Martin, Assistant Community Development Director C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA BoardmemberThompson moved to approve the agenda as approved. Seconded by BoardmemberShankar.Ayes -All The motion passed. D.APPROVAL OF MINUTES BoardmemberThompson moved to approve theOctober 15, 2019,CDRB minutes as submitted. Seconded by BoardmemberShankar.Ayes –Boardmember’sShankar & Thompson Abstention –Acting ChairLedvina The motion passed. E.NEW BUSINESS a.Design Review, Tumble Fresh, 223 Larpenteur Avenue East i.Assistant Community Development Director, Michael Martingave the report on theDesign Review for Tumble Fresh, 223 Larpenteur Avenue East and answered questions of the board. ii.Applicant, CEO, Stephen Linn, Linn Companies, addressed and answered questions of the board. rd iii.Architect, Elliot Stendel, Architectural ConsortiumLLC, 901 North 3Street, Minneapolis, addressed and answered questions of the board. November 19, 2019 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 1 Boardmember Shankarmoved toapprove the design plans date-stamped October 31, 2019, for a 4,770-square–foot commercial building located at 223 Larpenteur Avenue East. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following:(changes to the staff conditions are underlined and in bold). 1.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2.All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3.Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated November 8, 2019. 4.Prior to the city issuing any grading or building permits the applicant shall be required to do the following: a.Submit to staff a revised site plan that shows the elimination of the Larpenteur Avenue access drive. b.Submit to staff a copy of an executed and recorded shared access and maintenance agreement for the shared drive off of Adolphus Street. 5.The applicant shall provide an irrevocableletter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of 150 percent of the cost of installing the landscaping before getting a building permit. 6.Per city ordinance, all rooftop equipment is required to be screened. 7.The applicant is required to remove the existing Larpenteur Avenue access drive and restore it with curbing per Ramsey County requirements. 8.Per city ordinance, trash container enclosures shall be provided around all trash containers and shall be 100 percent opaque. The materials of the trash enclosure shall match the materials and colors of the building. 9.The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a.Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b.Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. c.Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d.Install all required outdoor lighting. e.Install all required sidewalks. 10.If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a.The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b.The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished November 19, 2019 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 2 exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 11.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 12.The east elevation, on the center panel below the signage, the entire panel shall be darkbrown brick as opposed to the banding. 13.The applicant shall contact the MPCA and the city if any contamination is found during work beyond what is currently defined. Seconded by BoardmemberThompson.Ayes –All Acting Chairperson Ledvina made a friendly amendment to number 8. The materials of the trash enclosure shall match materials and colors of the building. He also added condition 13. Related to existing contamination that the applicant shall contact the MPCA and the city if any contamination is beyond what is currently defined found during work. Boardmember Shankar and Thompson agreed to the amendments. The motion passed. b.2019 Community Design Review Board Annual Report i.Assistant Community Development Director, Michael Martin gave the report on the 2019 Community Design Review Board Annual Report. Boardmember Thompsonmoved to approvethe draft form of the 2019 Community Design Review Board Annual Report. Seconded by Acting Chairperson Ledvina.Ayes –All The motion passed. 14.UNFINISHEDBUSINESS None. 15.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. 16.BOARDPRESENTATIONS None. 17.STAFF PRESENTATIONS None. November 19, 2019 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 3 18.ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Acting Chairperson Ledvinaat6:45 p.m. November 19, 2019 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 4 COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Meeting Date January 21, 2020 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER:Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: Menard Inc., 2280 Maplewood Drive a. Design Review and Lot Division Resolution Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: Menard Inc., is seeking to replace its existing store at 2280 Maplewood Drive with a new building and storage yard. In addition, the applicant has secured purchase agreements with six residential properties to the south with the intent to incorporate these properties into the new building site. Recommended Action: a. Motion to approve a resolution for the design review plans and a lot division to combine six residential parcels with the commercial parcel located at 2280 Maplewood Drive. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0. Financing source(s):Adopted BudgetBudget ModificationNew Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Financial Sustainability Integrated Communication Targeted Redevelopment Operational Effectiveness Community Inclusiveness Infrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on January 9, 2020. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is March 9, 2020. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. Background: Menard Inc., is requesting approval to tear down its existing building and build a new 207,170- square-foot store in its place. In addition, Menards is proposing to purchase six residential properties to the south of its existing store, remove the houses, and incorporate the land into its new store site. Menard Inc.’s existing site is located at 2280 Maplewood Drive. The six residential properties are located at 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 and 1155 County Road B East. To move forward with this project, Menard Inc. needs city council approval of the following applications: comprehensive plan amendment, zoning map amendment, conditional use permit amendment, setback and shoreland overlay impervious surface variances, vacation of public utility easements, design review and a lot division to combine the lots. The layout of the site is largely dictated by a pipeline that runs through the site. The new building will be on the east side of the site, angling towards the northwest. The storage yard will then be located to the east and south of the building. Parking for the building will be located west of the building. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Menard Inc.’s existing site is guided for Mixed-Use – Community. The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan states that “The City intends the mixed use - community classification to be for community and regional serving commercial retail or service businesses, offices, and high-density housing.” The six residential properties located on County Road B East are currently guided for Low Density Residential. The applicant is requesting the six residential properties be reguided to Mixed-Use – Community to be consistent with its store site and allow for the redevelopment of the homes as part of a new Menards store. To approve this request, at least four council members must vote in the affirmative. The city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan has established several goals, many which are applicable to this request. Those goals include: 1. Promote the revitalization of neighborhood retail shopping centers and corridors and surrounding areas as mixed-use nodes that enhance the vitality of particular neighborhoods in Maplewood from the perspectives of economic development and community character. 2. Promote the efficient retention and redevelopment of commercial and industrial areas in the city as high quality and attractive developments and land uses. 3. Encourage attractive commercial and industrial developments. Zoning Map Amendment Menard Inc.’s existing site is zoned M-1, light manufacturing. The six residential properties located on County Road B East are currently zoned single dwelling. The applicant is requesting the six residential properties be rezoned to M-1, light manufacturing to be consistent with its store site and allow for the redevelopment of the homes as part of a new Menards store. To approve this request, at least four council members must vote in the affirmative. Conditional Use Permit Amendment A conditional use permit (CUP) is required for the exterior storage of goods or materialsand any building or exterior use within 350 feet of a residential district. Menard Inc. last amended its CUP on January 26, 2009 in order to build a new warehouse. Now, Menard Inc. is requesting approval to amend its CUP to build a new store building, new warehouse and for fencing surrounding its storage yard area. The existing CUP prohibits the use of an exterior public address system, requires snow to be stored away from the south and east shared residential property lines, limits hours of operation in the storage yard, garden center and warehouse to between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. and requires all lighting in the storage yard and warehouse not needed for site security be turned off after business hours. These requirements will remain in place. In addition, City staff is recommending the CUP be amended to include the following: All site lighting that is to remain on overnight must be dimmed to 50 percent intensity after the store closes. All lights within 100 feet of a residential property line must be shielded. All fences must be maintained and kept in good order. Menard Inc. will repair any fence issues within 15 business days of receiving notice from the City. Any fencing within 65 feet of the Maplewood Drive East right-of-way line may not exceed 8 feet in height. The existing 8-foot-tall fence between Menard Inc.’s property and the properties at 1071, 1081 and 1101 County Road B East must remain in place. This fence must be extended along the north property line of 1101 County Road B East after the existing warehouse is demolished. Any needed repairs to this existing fence must be completed before the City will issue a certificate of occupancy for the new store. All existing trees south of the existing 8-foot-tall fence and the properties at 1071, 1081 and 1101 County Road B must remain in place The 14-foot-tall fence between Menard Inc.’s property and east property line of 1101 County Road B East must be setback at least 20 feet from the property line. All portions of the 14-foot-tall fence and the new warehouse building shall be setback at least 30 feet from the County Road B East right-of-way line. All existing trees between the County Road B East right-of-way line and the 30-foot building and fence setback line must be maintained and are not permitted to be removed. All portions of the 14-foot-tall fence between Menard Inc.’s property and the west property lines of 2223 Duluth Street North and 2233 Duluth Street North shall be setback at least 20 feet from the shared property line. All portions of the 14-foot-tall fence between Menard Inc.’s property and the south property line of 2255 Duluth Street North shall be setback at least 20 feet from the shared property line. The warehouse building shall be setback at least 50 feet from all residential property lines to the east and west of Menard Inc.’s property. Any temporary or seasonal outdoor sales occurring in the parking lot must meet all City ordinance requirements, plus are required to be setback at least 100 feet from any residential property line. Setback Variance This site has historically been used for retail purposes since its original development in the 1960s. Menards purchased the site and building in 1989 and have completed several building additions since then. Menard Inc.’s proposal to redevelop the site has resulted in six setback variance requests. When determining approval of a variance the City must consider the practical difficulties of developing the site and meeting setback requirements. Based on state statute, to constitute practical difficulties a three-factor test must be satisfied. The first factor is that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. The second factor is that the landowner’s problem is due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the landowner. The third factor is that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Menard Inc. is requesting the following setback variances – see site plan below for locations: A. 0-setback from Maplewood Drive (main building). B. 0-foot setback from County Road B (comer of warehouse building) C. 30-foot setback from eastern property line (main building and warehouse building). D. 10-foot setback for the parking lot along south property line which borders residential. E. 10-foot setback for the parking lot along west property line which borders residential. F. 5-foot setback for the parking lot/storage yard along east property line which borders residential. Menard Inc.’s proposal to redevelop the site into a new store is a reasonable request. Staff believes there are unique circumstances affecting this property that are not caused by the landowner which include the parcel shape and the pipeline running through the property. Lastly, staff believes a new building can be built that will not alter the essential character of the locality. This last test is the most important aspect of this request. Removing six homes and expanding the footprint of the store will require mitigating factors to minimize the impact on the remaining neighbors. Staff has reviewed the applicant’s setback variance requests and believes the variance requests meet the standard above wholly in one case – location A – and partially in two of the cases – locations C and F. A. Staff recommends approval of a 0-setback from Maplewood Drive for the main building. This variance is justified and works to push the entire site plan north, away from existing residential properties. C.The new main building is proposed to be setback 33 feet and 11 inches from the east property line. Ordinance would typically require a 100 feet setback for a building on this site. However this building is being built in an area that is already being used as either the existing building or storage yard. Building the new main building will have minimal change as compared to existing conditions. The applicant is also proposing to build the warehouse with a setback 30 feet from the residential lot line to the east. Ordinance would typically require this warehouse be setback 100 feet. Staff finds that the proposed setback of 30 feet for the warehouse would adversely impact the character of the neighborhood and therefore does not meet the variance standards. Given the unique aspects to this site and project staff feels a 50-foot setback for the proposed warehouse is reasonable and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood. A 50-foot setback is the minimal setback ordinance requires for all new commercial buildings. F. The storage yard area along the applicant’s east property line would require a 20-feet setback when adjacent to residential property. Existing conditions do not meet this requirement. Staff believes a variance is justified in the areas that already are non- compliant. For any new storage yard areas adjacent to 2223 Duluth Street North, 2233 Duluth Street North and 2255 Duluth Street North the applicant shall be required to meet the code requirement of a 20 feet setback between commercial uses or parking lots and residential properties. A 5-foot parking lot setback in these new storage yard areas will alter the essential character of the locality and the applicant will still have reasonable use of the property after meeting ordinance minimums. Staff believes the three remaining variance requests do not meet the standard outlined in this report. Staff’s response to each of these variance requests is detailed below: B. As mentioned in the CUP section of this report, staff is recommending the warehouse building be setback 30 feet from the County Road B East right-of-way line. City ordinance requires commercial buildings be setback at least 30 feet from right-of-way lines. The closest home on the north side of County Road B East is currently approximately 37 feet with other homes set farther back. Increasing this setback of County Road B East will work to maintain the neighborhood’s existing character. A 0-foot setback will alter the essential character of the locality and the applicant will still have reasonable use of the property after meeting ordinance minimums. D. The applicant’s request for a 10-foot parking lot setback to the south property line becomes unneeded after the CUP requirement that the parking spaces near 1101 County Road B East be eliminated from the site plan dated January 9, 2020. Ordinance requires a 20 feet setback between commercial uses or parking lots and residential properties. A 10-foot parking lot setback will alter the essential character of the locality and the applicant will still have reasonable use of the property after meeting ordinance minimums. E. The applicant’s request for a 10-foot setback for the parking lot along west property line becomes unneeded after the CUP requirement that the fence near 1101 County Road B East be setback at least 20 feet. Ordinance requires a 20 feet setback between commercial uses or parking lots and residential properties. A 10-foot parking lot setback will alter the essential character of the locality and the applicant will still have reasonable use of the property after meeting ordinance minimums. Shoreland Overlay Impervious Surface Variance The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from the city’s shoreland overlay impervious surface coverage ordinance. The site is within the shoreland boundary of Keller Lake. The shoreland code requires a maximum coverage of 40 percent. A 60 percent impervious surface can be permitted with approval from the city engineer if the applicant is proposing additional stormwater management practices. The current Menard Inc. property has a 95 percent impervious surface coverage. This redevelopment project will reduce the amount of impervious surface coverage due to a stormwater pond and additional green space being added to the southwest corner of the applicant’s existing site. Because of existing conditions, Menard Inc. is not required to seek a variance for impervious surface coverage as long as its existing site is less than 95 percent impervious. Of the residential properties Menard Inc is proposing to buy, 1115 County Road B East is wholly within the shoreland boundary of Keller Lake; 1127 County Road B East is mostly within the boundary; and a small portion of 1133 County Road B East is within the boundary. This equates to 58,781 square feet within the shoreland boundary. The applicant has requested a 40 percent variance to allow 100 percent impervious surface within the shoreland boundary of these residential areas. Given the discussions in the CUP and setback variances section of this report the applicant will be required to increase its proposed setback thus allowing additional greenspace to remain within the shoreland boundary – equating to approximately 7,800 square feet or 13 percent of the area within the shoreland boundary. Given the information detailed above, staff is supportive of a shoreland overlay impervious surface coverage maximum of 80 percent – requiring a 20 percent variance above the ordinance’s 60 percent impervious surface limit which requires the developer to meet the city engineer’s conditions for additional stormwater management practices. The applicant can meet the 80 percent by increasing the amount of greenspace as detailed above or by using construction materials such as porous concrete. Before any permits are issued, the city engineer will be required to approve plans confirming all requirements discussed here are being met. Vacation of Public Utility Easements The applicant is requesting the city vacate portions of two public utility easements. Both easements are wholly within property Menard Inc. would own if this project proceeds. The city engineer has reviewed this request and determined that there is no anticipated public need for the easement any longer and the requested vacation is not counter to the public interest. Design Review Site Plan The layout of the site is largely dictated by a pipeline that runs through the site. The new building will be on the east side of the site, angling towards the northwest. The storage yard will then be located to the east and south of the building. Parking for the building will be located west of the building. Entrance to the storage yard also shifts to the east of the building. The applicant is proposing three access drives to the main parking lot from Maplewood Drive. The site currently has two access drives. Staff is comfortable with the proposed east two access drives. The new access drive proposed to be located south of the stormwater pond on the west side of the site is of concern to staff. Given its proximity to the County Road B and Maplewood Drive intersection staff believes this would become the primary access point to the site. Considering its location to the existing homes to the south staff does not believe this new access drive should be permitted. Staff is recommending this access drive be eliminated and kept as greenspace between the stormwater pond and homes to the south. There is a small finger of land of land that extends eastward and is surrounded by land owned by Schmelz Countryside. The applicant’s proposed site plan appears to encroach onto land owned by Schmelz. A revised site plan will be required ensuring all construction is taking place on property owned by Menard Inc. Building Elevations The height of the main building is 30 feet and 1.5 inches. The peak of the main entrance canopy rises approximately another 8 feet. The proposed building material for most of the front (west) and left (north) elevations is concrete block. The rear (east) elevation is a combination of concrete block and green metal panels. The right (south) elevation will mostly consist of the green metal panels. The proposed warehouse building will be 30 feet and 3 inches in height. Green metal panels will be used for the warehouse elevations internal to the site. The elevation facing County Road B East is proposed to be built with concrete block. City ordinance states that new buildings shall be: “in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan;” and, “the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors.” In this neighborhood, the City has seen recent commercial development projects include the remodeled Schmelz FIAT dealership, remodeled Metro Heating and Cooling building, a new Holiday gas station and the new Keller Golf Course clubhouse. It is staff’s position that the building materials for this proposed building fall short in meeting the building standards established in this part of Maplewood. The elevations that are proposed to have concrete block will be very visible to highways 36 and 61 and County Road B East. Staff is recommending the applicant be required to replace the proposed concrete block on both the main building and warehouse elevations with a brick façade. The brick face shall consist of two colors with staff being required to approve revised building elevations. Staff is comfortable with the use of the green metal panels as they will either be used on areas internal to the site or as accent materials on the more visible elevations. Staff would also recommend the main entrance be enhanced with stone or wood façade columns. In reviewing newer Menards stores in the Twin Cities, staff found that many stores used brick facades and believe this is the right treatment for the Maplewood store as well. Also, staff is recommending the applicant be required to add additional windows and architectural elements to the left (north) elevation. As proposed, the left (north) elevation is a large blank wall facing Highway 36. Landscaping Given the required revised setbacks outlined in this report, the applicant shall be required to resubmit a tree preservation plan. This revised plan shall reflect the trees that will no longer need to be removed given the requirements of this report. The applicant’s landscaping plan shows the addition of 88 new trees to the site. All proposed trees are deciduous. The applicant will be required to submit a revised landscaping plan reflecting the expanded greenspace surrounding the storage yard and warehouse. The applicant shall increase the amount of trees to be planted between the fence and County Road B East right-of-way line from 7 to 14. At least 50 percent of the 14 trees shall be coniferous. Staff acknowledges that no trees are permitted to be added within the pipeline setback area. In addition, the revised landscape plan shall reflect any trees removed due to grading near the Maplewood Drive right-of-way. Any trees removed within the Maplewood Drive right-a-way must be replaced. The city engineer will approve location, species and size of all trees planted within the right-of-way. Parking Since Menard Inc. opened a store at its existing site, the City has granted multiple parking waivers. The existing store is 187,922 square feet in size – meaning ordinance would require 940 parking spaces. With the City-approved parking waivers the current store actually provides 401 spaces – meaning that the City has waived 539 spaces. The new building will be 207,170 square feet in size – requiring 1,036 parking spaces. Staff acknowledges the ordinance requirement of providing one parking space per every 200 square feet of store area overburdens a store like Menards. The City must account for the type of products and users Menards caters to. The applicant is requesting a waiver to be allowed to provide 430 parking spaces. Given the site plan adjustments being required above in this report 22 parking spaces would be removed from the south property line. The applicant has the opportunity to stripe parking spaces for employees only to nine feet wide and staff believes some other efficiencies can be found in the site plan to add back some additional spaces. With the required site plan changes staff is comfortable with allowing a parking waiver to allow a minimum of 420 parking spaces on this site. Signage No signage is being approved with this report and approvals. Menard Inc. is permitted two wall signs and two freestanding signs per ordinance requirements. These signs must meet all ordinance requirements in terms of size and placement. All signs require sign permits be acquired from the City prior to installation. Lighting The applicant shall be required to submit a revised photometric plan meeting the City’s 0.4 footcandle requirements. The current photometric plan shows this requirement being exceeded near the south and east property lines. All light poles must meet the 25-foot height limit. The applicant is requesting City approval for taller light poles but staff does not feel taller poles are warranted nor appropriate with this site’s proximity to residential properties. As mentioned earlier in this report, all lights not needed for site security shall be turned off at store closing. Lights that are to remain on overnight shall automatically be dimmed to 50 percent intensity upon store closing. Pipeline City ordinance requires all buildings be setback at least 100 feet from a pipeline. The ordinance also allows the council to approve a waiver to this setback requirement. The existing southwest corner of the building has a 0-foot setback from the site’s pipeline easement. The new proposed building will also be near a 0-foot setback and will at all time be outside of the easement itself. Staff see no concerns with the building placement in relation to the pipeline easement. Lot Division to Combine Residential Lots As mentioned in this report, the applicant has purchase agreements in place with six residential properties south of its existing store site. It is proposing to combine its existing site with the six residential properties. If the applicant’s other requests are approved, staff has no issues or concerns with combing all seven lots into a single parcel of property. Department Comments Engineering Please see Jon Jarosch’s engineering report, dated January 13, 2020, attached to this report. Environmental Please see Shann Finwall’s environmental report, dated January 13, 2020, attached to this report. Building From Dave Peterson – Building Official: Build per 2012 IBC, 2012 IMC, 2012 IFGC, 2014 NEC, 2012 Minnesota State Plumbing Code, 2015 Minnesota State Fire Code, MN 2015 Accessibility code, MN1306, and 2015 Minnesota Building Code. Demonstrate compliance with all the requirements of the 2012 Minnesota Energy Code Chapter 1323 Section C401.2. Mixing 2012 IECC provisions and ASHRAE Standard 90.1 to obtain compliance is not an option. The following forms must be completed as submittals. a. ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Building Envelope Compliance Documentation b. ASHRAE 90.1-2010 HVAC Compliance Documentation c. ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Service Water Heating Compliance Documentation d. ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Lighting Compliance Documentation e. Or COMCHECK Special inspections required as per 2012 IBC Chapter 17. Complete supporting special inspection schedule document and submit with plans. Plumbing plans shall be submitted to the State Plumbing Department for approval prior to the issuance of a plumbing permit. St Paul water requires permits for water piping. Maplewood requires permit for drain waste and vent. Permits are required for building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, fire alarm, and sprinklers. Provide two sets of stamped and signed plans and one digital set. Board and Commission Review January 21, 2020: The community design review board will review this project January 21, 2020: The planning commission will hold a public hearing and review this project. Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 68 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site for their opinion about this proposal. Staff received 17 responses – all shown below. 1. Letter attached to this report. (Samantha Crosby, 1133 County Road B East) 2. Letter attached to this report. (Jean Anderson and Judy Zielinski, 2255 Duluth Street) 3. We’d like to go on record in support and have no concerns to share about any of the proposed requests being made in regards to the project. We look forward to the updated store and amenities that will be provided. (Joan and Erin Phillips, 1172 Leland Road East) 4. I'm writing in regards to the Menard plans we received in the mail this past week. The portion I am most concerned with is the Product Storage Yard and the plan to screen this from County Road B and the residential dwellings across the street. I am attaching a couple of pictures to help, if you don't receive them please let me know. According to the picture titled Elevation, the elevation on the roadbed in front of our house is 875 ft., I believe that standing on my front step my sight line is 14-16 feet above the roadbed. My concern is whether the proposed wall will be high enough to contain the sights and sounds of the product storage yard and that the proposed trees along the wall are ornamental Sugar Maples. It would seem a much better choice would be some type of evergreen, which would provide year round screening provided they planted something in the 14 - 18 foot range. Additionally we can't tell from the specs how far back the wall is from the road. We know from experience that nothing will grow close to the road due to the plowed snow and salt during the winter. Elevation Area of concern 1112 Co Rd B East (Bill Skadden and Gretchen Hagen, 1112 County Road B East) 5. I have no objection to the overall project and encourage redevelopment of the area. However, I have one concern of the setback of the “yard” fence to the west of our property such that out FIAT/ALFA building is still visible from Highway 36. They are requesting 0’ from the road. This would obstruct our investment. I would not object to a 75’ minimum setback to the proposed “yard entrance.” I do not object to the 0’ setback of the building as proposed. (Jonathan Schmelz, 1180 Highway 36 East) 6. I would say that Menard's has been a good neighbor since it bought and redeveloped the old "GEM" (come grocery store) property. Yet there is a limit to good growth certainly. One of our neighbors sent us an email expressing their concern about whether the project would have any effects on our own properties (valuation) since they are close by, but not contiguous. I can only speculate on this subject at this point. Nevertheless, I do want to offer an opinion about public safety (traffic control) relating to the project. I would also offer an opinion on the aesthetics of the project as well. That Menard's generates quite a bit of vehicular traffic cannot be denied... particularly at certain times of the day. I would speculate though that a certain amount of traffic is generated by contractors and clients who need to obtain commodities quickly and be on their way. What is bothersome to me is the traffic control at the junction of County Road B and Maplewood Drive E. There is also a sight distance problem at that intersection for those desiring to turn left when exiting Maplewood Drive on to CR B. My observation with regard to traffic control is based on my almost daily passing of that junction as I travel west to access TH 61. I have nearly been "T Boned" on several occasions by vehicles not stopping as they turn right on to CR B to get to TH 61. \[Drivers among the cohort of contractors and people with time constraints, likely.\] Similarly traffic exiting TH 61 (whether from the south or the north) fills the turn lane to Maplewood Drive and often impedes east to west traffic on to TH 61 as the west to east traffic fills the lane and drivers turn left on to Maplewood Drive. Therefore I would encourage the City of Maplewood to conduct an ongoing traffic engineering study of the intersection. Secondly, with regard to aesthetics, I would offer the opinion that high mast lighting and signage facing residential properties in the area should be controlled as well. On premise advertising and lighting can be harsh and destroy the visual environment for surrounding residents. (Kenneth H. Bjork, 1140 Lealand Road East) 7. Not in favor of the Menard's project . . . The last 2 sentences in paragraph 1 of your letter are confusing. No access is being proposed or will be permitted from County Road B East to the new store. (It is dangerous enough turning to go to Menard's on the service road let alone coming out of there. People just don't observe the stop sign coming out on to County Road B after they have visited Menards.) Access drives to a new store building would be located generally in the same area as today. (Or will customers be coming from Highway 36 and English Street. If customers are coming from the east on Highway 36, turning left to get to the service road is nearly impossible.) If Menard's is permitted to tear down 5 or 6 homes will they then be permitted to tear down the homes on Duluth Street north of County Road B on the west side of the street when they need to “grow more”? Is big business the only thought in Maplewood's eye? Not the residents? Think of the residents who have lived in those homes for several years. Also, what happens to the property values in the area around a new Menard's? (Clifford and Sharon McGinnis, 1134 Leland Road East) 8. Both my wife and I are opposed to the proposal put forth by Menards. The drawings sent do not give enough information to see what is really being proposed. In particular, the set-back next to County Road B. The drawing shows the property line extending beyond the center of County Road B. I do not understand how this is possible or could have been approved by the city. Asking for a 0-foot set-back on County Road B is not right. It will put the yard within a few feet of the street. The noise pollution along with the lighting (despite what Menards says) will create a disturbance to the surrounding neighbors next to and across Country Road B. We believe the set-back should be the same as the current home set-back along County Road B. It should not be within a few feet of the road. To block the noise and lights taller trees are needed. Pine trees to create a block year-round. This is not possible with the current proposal set-back. We are opposed to the taking down of mature trees that add so much to the character of the neighborhood. We do not believe that a 14-foot fence will block the light or noise created especially with the lights on all night. When we bought into this community, it was the neighborhood that attracted us to Maplewood. Now we are seeing that neighborhood turning into a commercial sight. With this change we believe our property value will decrease with the current plan encroaching on the residential area along County Road B. Has the city consulted with real estate companies find out what the real impact will be on the homes affected by this proposal? We are disappointed that the city has waited until the 11th hour to notify the citizens that are directly affected by the encroaching commercial business. It leaves us with very little time to study and respond appropriately. We are looking forward to the meetings to learn more on how this will impact our neighborhood and voice our concerns with all our neighbors. (Jay and Cheryl Stutsman, 1108 County Road B East) 9. Many of the neighbors in the surrounding area walk to Menards. At this time there is not a safe walking option. Please consider a pedestrian path to the store. As of now, we have to cross busy County Road B and walk in the street or the side of the boulevard which is dangerous and inconvenient. Providing a walking/biking path will reduce car traffic and allow people to get to Menards via other methods. Thank you for your time and consideration. (William and Shari Adams, 1126 Leland Road East) 10. No extra entrance to parking lot between us and the holding pond. GREEN SPACE Holding pond is a major concern due to past flooding of our property. We have had to endure severely flooded property 3 times in the past due to inadequate drainage. Do not move fence. Keep existing fence and trees. (Catherine and Debra Dupre, 1071 County Road B East) 11. Our main concern is that the Menards property lines are misrepresented on the plan. The draft indicates there will be green space after the fence, however, the fence will actually come all the way up to County Road B. This is will greatly reduce our property value, which is extremely disappointing because we just purchased our house in June of 2019. We want a setback to where the six residential properties currently stand. Menards needs to follow the same property setback standards as residential properties. The current properties have a 60ft. setback and this needs to apply to the new plan as well. In addition to a setback of at least 60 ft., we would like the boulevard to be heavily landscaped with mature lush trees (e.g., Pines Trees and Evergreens). We do not want to look out our window and see a fence. We are also concerned about how this project will change the character of the neighborhood. There will be trucks, lights, and lots of loud noise right next to our house. We have a baby and the Menards will bring more traffic, which is dangerous if our child is near the street. In addition, we would like the following questions to be addressed: How long will the six homes be vacant until they are demolished? What will be done to deter crime at these six vacant houses? Who will watch these houses? What hours will Menards be tearing down the houses? What will the hours of construction be? What hours will trucks be traveling on County Road B during the construction? How often will we be updated about the construction? What kinds of chemicals and debris will we be exposed to during the demolition and construction? What will the fence look like? Will vehicles park at Menards overnight? How often will the trees and grass in the setback be maintained? Will trucks/Menards vehicles be left idling? Where will the garbage from Menards be kept? What will be done to prevent chemicals in the air? Will the trucks make noise when they go in reverse? When will the pond be maintained? Who will maintain the pond? What will be done to prevent odor from the pond? (Mary Onchiri and Aniell Ducat, 1136 County Road B E) 12. I am writing to you in regards to the Menards rebuild project. I am a resident of one of the homes that Menards would be purchasing and tearing down. I have personally lived at this residence for the last five years and have never had an issue with Menards as a neighbor. Their lights are not obnoxiously bright, noise levels are minimal, and the newer turn lane off of County Road B has helped with the traffic entering the frontage road. I had actually reached out to the utility company to survey my yard back in September of 2018 because I was interested in adding on to my garage and remodeling my home (feel free to look in to this). I would never have considered an addition if I was unhappy with the business in my backyard. Although the neighbors around the area seem to be unhappy with the idea of Menards being so close to them and the road, they have never lived with them as a neighbor and I don't believe they understand that they aren't bad neighbors. They are very respectful when it comes to concerns. I know one of my neighbors called about the flagpole making a slight clanking noise (not something I could even hear) and it was taken care of immediately. From different things I have read on social media, certain neighbors believe these houses that we live in are perfectly good houses, in great condition, and would be tragic to lose them. Unfortunately mine is NOT in great condition and needs a lot of very expensive work, something that some of the neighboring residents might not be taking in to account. I have a tree in my front yard that has some roots grown into the sewer line, along with an entire house that needs to be rewired. The list goes on. I know at least two of the other property owners of the six of us are in the same situation. Their houses need work and they're not inexpensive projects that need to be tackled. Before Menards contacted us about selling, my wife and I were going to start tackling some of the problems that we could afford to begin with. But with the chance that our house might be sold/demolished we did not want to invest the time and money. This project will give us an opportunity to purchase a home without problems that we wouldn’t be able to afford otherwise. As I stated before, I was interested in adding an addition onto my existing garage and stay because Menards has been a great neighbor. I don't foresee their project detrimentally effecting the existing neighbors or neighborhood. A new building will bring in business, increase tax revenue for the city of Maplewood, and be a visual improvement to a building that is looking rather outdated and rundown. I see it as a win win for everyone involved. Thank you for your time. (Timothy Skiffington, 1127 County Rd B East) 13. We received your information letter dated 23-Dec asking for input on the Menards proposal for the replacement of their store at the corner of Hwy 61 and Hwy 36. We do feel the need to qualify our comments below as we are one of the properties (we are the owners of 1115 County Road B East) that Menards approached about buying in order to accomplish their store replacement so have a bias in if the project proceeds or not. Also, we are sending our reply via email so that we can get our comments in to you prior to your deadline of Jan 10, 2020. We will also send a printed copy to you so you have that for the city records. That being said we are pleased with the proposal Menards has made. When we were originally approached by them they were only talking about expanding their lumber yard but the proposal now is for a whole new store which we think is a much better solution. We’d be the first to admit that, although they have tried to keep the store in good condition, it is starting to show it’s age vs the new stores they have and the competition in the area. It appears from the plan you sent to keep the existing traffic flow so there should not be any additional traffic on County Road B vs today and it does not change significantly the work that was recently done on the Hwy 61/County Road B intersection. I do think long term some additional work needs to be done at that intersection though such as retiming the left turn light off Hwy 61SB onto County Road B (or changing it to a flashing yellow) so traffic does not stack up so bad in that turn lane but that is probably a bit off topic. The proposal also has some nice green space along the privacy fence they are running along County Road B so it does appear they have put some thought into the appearance of the property for the neighbors. Overall we think the proposal for Menards is a good compromise in keeping the neighborhood we lived in, and still have friends in, in good appearances yet achieves the added room they would like for an updated store. We also would like to see Menards stay in this area of Maplewood as they have been a good neighbor and we believe they will continue to be so we are in favor of the Menards proposal. (Jim Tryon, 1115 County Road B East) 14. We have serious concerns about our property value. Looking out the front of my house to the back of Menards yard is not pleasing. Add to that listening to trucks and lifts backing up day and night with bright lights shining in our bedroom windows. Our houses were not designed to face an industrial yard, our bedrooms face the front of the yard that will be impacted by the noise and lights that from this yard. We recently refinanced; there is no way we can get that value out of it once Menards builds. Suddenly the city has rezoned the property across the street. Are there quiet hours that Menards must abide by? I know Menards had plans that did not include building up to the road - they should not be allowed to build that close to residential property. If I or any of my neighbors were to build along the road we would need to build a certain distance (?? Feet from the road or path) Yet Menards is allowed build so close to the road that there isn’t room to plant trees to cover up their ugly fence. How close is this fence to County Road B? (I am referring to the ones next to and around 1128 County Road B). How tall is the fence in this area (in some areas I have read 14 ft but in some plans I have seen 6ft )? This fence should be tall enough to block some of the noise and light from the yard. Will this be a soundproof fence? (Peter and Denise Fuglestad, 1128 County Road B East) 15. Application response A from question one is a farce. “Improve traffic congestion?” Six homes on County Road B generate how much traffic?? The congestion that has occurred and increased is the stop sign coming off of Maplewood Drive. While traveling west on County Road B you have to make certain people actually stop there. That intersection needs some attention. “The detention pond” is an eye sore at best. Mosquito breeding area for sure. Who is responsible for taking care of it? The other pond on Menards property had volunteer trees and vegetation that eventually had to be removed. We don’t agree that the property values will not be impacted by this change. Especially the folks on the south side of County Road B with their neighbors to the north gone and wall to look at. We find it curious that Menards can have a parking lot over the pipeline. Our neighbor was forced to have nine trees (mature trees) cut down on his property so trucks could get in if something went wrong with the pipeline. They wanted to have total access to the pipeline. Why is it different for a business?? We are not in favor of this proposal to change Menards and the existing land around it. (Dick and Jane Fosse, 1161 Leland Road East) 16. This proposal will mean a lot more noise from maintaining the parking lots, my solution is to buy the remaining three houses. Otherwise we will living with a lot more noise and living conditions will be worse. (George and Nancy Valento, 1081 County Road B East) 17. I have personally lived with Menards in my backyard for over 10 years and never once had a noise, light or traffic issue in the ten plus years. I do not forsee the renovation that Menards is proposing will cause any of these issues for the existing neighbors either. As long as the fence and landscaping is properly done, I think the project is a great one for the city, and existing neighbors. (Taryn Fischbach, 1127 County Road B East) Reference Information Site Description Site Size: Menard Inc. site – 12.89 acres; Six residential properties – 4.3 acres; Total 17.19 acres Existing Land Use: Menards store with outdoor sales and parking lot and single dwellings Surrounding Land Uses North: Highway 36 East: Countryside VW/FIAT and Single Dwellings South: Single dwellings West: Highway 61 Planning Existing Land Use: Mixed-Use – Community and Low Density Residential Existing Zoning: Light Manufacturing (M-1) and Single-Dwelling Residential (R1) Previous Actions March 28, 1988: The city council approved Menards’ CUP and granted a parking reduction authorization. January 23, February 13, March 27 and April 6, 1989: The city council changed the CUP conditions. The changes were to clarify the screening fence and storage-rack height requirements. . April 8, 1996: The city council amended the CUP conditions because of a request for a seasonal outdoor greenhouse and plant sale operation. October 25, 1999: The city council approved a CUP revision for the building expansion and site plan changes. Council also approved the architectural, site and landscape plans. April 9, 2001: The city council approved revised plans for the exterior of the new addition and required additional landscaping on the Highway 36 side of the building. January 30, 2004: The city council approved plans for expansion of the exterior storage area and relocation of the fire gate. March 27, 2006: The city council approved a CUP revision to enlarge the building and a parking- reduction authorization for 50 spaces. This allowed Menards to have 401 parking stalls. January 26, 2009: The city council approved a CUP revision to build a new warehouse building. Attachments: 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution 2. Zoning Map Amendment Ordinance 3. Conditional Use Permit Amendment, Setback Variances and Shoreland Overlay Impervious Surface Variance Resolution 4. Public Easements Vacation Resolution 5. Resolution Approving Site And Design Plans And A Lot Division To Combine Seven Properties 6. Overview Map 7. 2040 Future Land Use Map 8. Zoning Map 9. Shoreland Overlay Map 10. Proposed Land Use Map 11. Applicant’s Narrative 12. Parking examples of other Menards stores 13. Site Plan 14. Landscape Plan 15. Building Elevations 16. Public Utility Easements, Ramsey County Recorded Document No. 1526919 17. Jon Jarosch’s Engineering Report, dated January 13, 2020 18. Shann Finwall’s Environmental Report, dated January 13, 2020 19. Samantha Crosby Letter 20. Jean Anderson and Judy Zielinsk Letter 21. Applicant’s Plans (separate attachment) Attachment 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION Resolution approving the comprehensive plan amendment reguiding the properties at 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 and 1155 County Road B East from Low Density Residential, to Mixed-Use – Community. Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Nicholas Brenner of Menard, Inc. has requested approval of a comprehensive plan amendment. 1.02 The properties are is located at 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 and 1155 County Road B East and are legally described as: PIN: 092922430011 – Block 9, except the Easterly 594 feet and Westerly 104 feet thereof, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430010 – Block 9, except the Easterly 594 feet and Westerly 104 feet thereof, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430009 – The West 62 ft. of the East 594 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430008 – The West 52 ft. of the East 532 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430007 – The West 171 ft. of the East 480 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430006 – The West 147 ft. of the East 309 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey, County, Minnesota. Section 2. Criteria. 2.01 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan states the document may require amending due to a property owner request to change land use designation to allow a proposed development or redevelopment. Attachment 1 2.02 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan amendment process follows the same City identified public hearing process as the major update process used to develop the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Amendments are required to submit and gain approval from the Metropolitan Council. Section 3. Findings 3.01 The requested amendment would meet various amendment criteria outlined in the 2040 Comprehensive Guide Plan. 1. Promote the revitalization of neighborhood retail shopping centers and corridors and surrounding areas as mixed-use nodes that enhance the vitality of particular neighborhoods in Maplewood from the perspectives of economic development and community character. 2. Promote the efficient retention and redevelopment of commercial and industrial areas in the city as high quality and attractive developments and land uses. 3. Encourage attractive commercial and industrial developments. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this amendment request. 1. On January 21, 2020, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council _________the comprehensive plan amendment. 2. On February 10, 2020, the city council discussed the comprehensive plan amendment. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The above described comprehensive plan amendment is ________ based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to, and only effective upon, the following conditions: 1. Review and approval of the Metropolitan Council as provided by state statute. 2. The site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans: a. Site plan, date-stamped January 9, 2020. b. Design plans, date-stamped December 24, 2019. Attachment 1 3. The development must further comply with all conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. _______ for a conditional use permit amendment, setback variances and shoreland overlay variance _________ by the Maplewood City Council on February 10, 2020. ___________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on February 10, 2020. Attachment 2 AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PROPERTIESAT 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 AND 1155 COUNTY ROAD B EAST FROM R-1, SINGLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO M-1, LIGHT MANUFACTURING The City Of Maplewood, Minnesota Ordains: Section 1. 1.01 The properties at 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 and 1155 County Road B East are hereby rezoned from R-1, single dwelling residential district, to M-1, light manufacturing. 1.02 The properties are legally described as: PIN: 092922430011 – Block 9, except the Easterly 594 feet and Westerly 104 feet thereof, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430010 – Block 9, except the Easterly 594 feet and Westerly 104 feet thereof, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430009 – The West 62 ft. of the East 594 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430008 – The West 52 ft. of the East 532 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430007 – The West 171 ft. of the East 480 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430006 – The West 147 ft. of the East 309 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey, County, Minnesota. Section 2. 2.01 This ordinance is based on the following findings: 1. The rezoning to M-1, light manufacturing would result in a development compatible with the existing surrounding development type and intensity. 2. The rezoning would be consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance and the comprehensive guide plan. Attachment 2 3. The rezoning would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 2.02 This ordinance is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans: a. Site plan, date-stamped January 9, 2020. b. Design plans, date-stamped December 24, 2019. 2. The development must further comply with all conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. _______ for a conditional use permit amendment, setback variances and shoreland overlay variance _________ by the Maplewood City Council on February 10, 2020. Section 3. This ordinance is effective upon publication in the city’s official newspaper. __________ by the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on February 10, 2020. Attachment 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, SETBACK VARIANCES AND SHORELAND OVERLAY VARIANCE RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Nicholas Brenner of Menard, Inc. has requested approval of a condition use permit amendment. 1.02 The applicant has requested approval of multiple setback variances. 1.03 The application has requested approval of a shoreland overlay impervious surface variance. 1.04 The property located at 2280 Maplewood Drive is legally described as: That certain triangle of land situated in the Southwest quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, described as follows to wit: Commencing at a point on the East line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 9 at its intersection with the easterly line of United States Highway No. 61, as widened; thence South on the East line of said Southwest quarter to a point 100 feet North of the North line of County Road "B" thence West and parallel with the North line of said County Road "B" to the Easterly line of United States Highway No. 61, as widened; thence Northeasterly along the Easterly line of said United States Highway No. 61, as widened, to the point of beginning. Less and except that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the east line of said Southwest Quarter and a line parallel with, distant 100.00 feet north of the north right of way line of County Road B; thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 33 seconds West, along said east line 105.40 feet to the intersection with the westerly extension of the north line of Block 2 of Heinemann's Belleview Addition to Gladstone; thence North 08 degrees 02 minutes,44 seconds West 140.00 feet more or less to the southeasterly right of way line of United States Highway No. 61, as widened; thence southwesterly 268 feet more or less along said southeasterly right of way line to the intersection with a line parallel with, distant 100 feet north of the north right of way line of County Road B; thence North 89 degrees 18 minutes 48 seconds East, along said parallel line 125 feet more or less to the point of beginning. And: The South 107 feet of that part of the North 5 acres of the South 50 rods of the North 105 rods of the West 32 rods of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, which lies Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said 5 acre tract which line is the South line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter, distant 60 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence running Northeasterly to the Northeast comer of said tract and there terminating. Attachment 3 And All that part of the West 32 rods of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range22,lying North of County Road "B", except Heinemann's Belleview addition to Gladstone, and except highway. The properties located at 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 and 1155 County Road B East are legally described as: PIN: 092922430011 – Block 9, except the Easterly 594 feet and Westerly 104 feet thereof, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430010 – Block 9, except the Easterly 594 feet and Westerly 104 feet thereof, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430009 – The West 62 ft. of the East 594 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430008 – The West 52 ft. of the East 532 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430007 – The West 171 ft. of the East 480 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430006 – The West 147 ft. of the East 309 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey, County, Minnesota. Section 2. Standards. 2.01 City Ordinance Section 44-512(4) requires a Conditional Use Permit for the exterior storage of goods or materials. 2.02 Section 44-637(b) requires a Conditional Use Permit for any building or exterior use within 350 feet of a residential district. 2.03 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. City Ordinance Section 44-1097(a) states that the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine standards for approval. 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. Attachment 3 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 2.04 Variance Standard. City Ordnance Section 44-13 refers to state statute which states a variance may be granted from the requirements of the zoning ordinance when: (1) the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this ordinance; (2) when the variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) when the applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. Practical difficulties mean: (1) The proposed use is reasonable; (2) the need for a variance is caused by circumstances unique to the property, not created by the property owner, and not solely based on economic conditions. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The proposal meets the specific conditional use permit standards. 3.02 The following setback variances would meet the required standards for a variance: 1. A 0-setback from Maplewood Drive for the main building. This variance is justified and works to push the entire site plan north, away from existing residential properties. 2. The new main building is proposed to be setback 33 feet and 11 inches. Ordinance would typically require a 100 feet setback for a building of this site. However this building is being built in an area that is already being used as either the existing building or storage yard. Building the new main building will have minimal change as compared to existing conditions. Attachment 3 3. The warehouse is proposed to be setback 30 feet from the residential lot line to the east. Ordinance would typically require this warehouse be setback 100 feet. Given the unique aspects to this site and project a 50-foot setback is reasonable. A 50-foot setback is the minimal setback ordinance requires for all new commercial buildings. 4. The storage yard area along the applicant’s east property line would normally require a 20-feet setback when adjacent to residential property. Existing conditions do not meet this requirement. Therefore a variance is justified in the areas that already are non-compliant. 3.03 The following setback variances do not meet the required standards and are denied: 1. For the new storage yard areas adjacent to 2223 Duluth Street North, 2233 Duluth Street North and 2255 Duluth Street North, the applicant shall be required to meet the code requirement of a 20 feet setback between commercial uses or parking lots and residential properties. The requested 5-foot parking lot setback in these new storage yard areas would alter the essential character of the locality and the applicant will still have reasonable use of the property after meeting ordinance minimums. 2. The applicant requested a 0-foot setback for its proposed warehouse building from County Road B East. City ordinance requires commercial buildings be setback at least 30 feet from right-of-way lines. The closest home on the north side of County Road B East is currently approximately 37 feet with other homes set farther back. Increasing this setback of County Road B East will work to maintain the neighborhood’s existing character. A 0-foot setback will alter the essential character of the locality and the applicant will still have reasonable use of the property after meeting ordinance minimums. 3. The applicant requested a 10-foot parking lot setback to the south property line. Ordinance requires a 20 feet setback between commercial uses or parking lots and residential properties. A 10-foot parking lot setback will alter the essential character of the locality and the applicant will still have reasonable use of the property after meeting ordinance minimums. 4. The applicant requested a 10-foot setback for the parking lot along west property line. Ordinance requires a 20 feet setback between commercial uses or parking lots and residential properties. A 10-foot parking lot setback will alter the essential character of the locality and the applicant will still have reasonable use of the property after meeting ordinance minimums. 3.04 The following shoreland overlay impervious surface variance would meet the required standards for a variance: 1. The applicant’s request of a 40 percent variance to the shoreland overlay impervious surface coverage maximum does not meet the standards for a variance. But a 20 percent variance above the ordinance’s 60 percent impervious surface bonus limit, which requires meeting the city engineer’s conditions for additional stormwater management practices, would meet these standards. The Attachment 3 applicant will be allowed to have 80 percent impervious surface coverage within the shoreland overlay within the existing properties of 1115, 1127 and 1133 County Road B East. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering these conditional use permit amendment, setback variances and shoreland overlay impervious surface variance requests. 1. On January 21, 2020, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Pioneer Press and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council _________ this resolution. 2. On February 10, 2020, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): 1. Adherence to the site plan date-stamped January 9, 2020 October 1, 2008 and design plans date-stamped December 24, 2019. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. Compliance with the following screening-fence requirements: a. The property owner shall continue to have and keep, in a maintained condition, wooden screening fences as follows: a. The eight-foot-tall screening fence west of 1071 County Road Band running east-west behind 1071, 1081 and part of 1101 County Road B between the parking lot and the residential lots shall remain. b. The existing eight-foot-tall fence between Menard Inc.’s property and the properties at 1071, 1081 and 1101 County Road B East must remain in place. This fence must be extended along the north property line of 1101 County Road B East after the existing warehouse is demolished. Any needed repairs to this existing fence must be completed before the City will issue a certificate of occupancy for the new store. c. Any fencing within 65 feet of the Maplewood Drive East right-of-way line may not exceed 8 feet in height. d. All existing trees south of the existing 8-foot-tall fence and the properties at 1071, 1081 and 1101 County Road B must remain in place. Attachment 3 e. The 14-foot-tall fence between Menard Inc.’s property and east property line of 1101 County Road B East must be setback at least 20 feet from the property line. f. All portions of the 14-foot-tall fence and the new warehouse building shall be setback at least 30 feet from the County Road B East right-of-way line. g. All fences must be maintained and kept in good order. Menard Inc. will repair any fence issues within 15 business days of receiving notice from the City. h. All portions of the 14-foot-tall fence between Menard Inc.’s property and the west property lines of2223 Duluth Street North and 2233 Duluth Street North shall be setback at least 20 feet from the shared property line. i.All portions of the 14-foot-tall fence between Menard Inc.’s property and the south property line of 2255 Duluth Street North shall be setback at least 20 feet from the shared property line. j.All other screening fences that abut the residential lots and the new fences on the east and south sides of the property as shown on the site plan date- stamped October 1, 2008 shall be 14 feet tall. j. All screening fences shall be constructed of vertical boards of the same dimension, color and material, except for the fence on the south side of the warehouse where horizontal boards may be used. k. No material on the storage racks, adjacent to the fence behind adjacent to 1101 and 1115 County Road B, shall extend above the 14-foot-tall fence. l. No more than 2½ feet of the 17½-foot-tall interior storage racks shall be visible from the homes to the south that are at street level along County Road B. This excludes those houses that sit higher on a hill. m. Menards shall be responsible for the safety of the neighbors in regard to the materials stored over the height of the fence. 3. Hours of operation in the storage yard, garden center and warehouse shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 4. An exterior public address system shall not be allowed. 5. All lighting in the storage yard and warehouse that is not needed for site security shall be turned off after business hours. All site lighting that is to remain on overnight, must be dimmed to 50 percent intensity after the store closes. All lights within 100 feet of a residential property line must be shielded away from homes. 6. The city council shall review this permit revision in one year. 7. Plowed snow shall be stored away from the southern and eastern property lines to avoid runoff problems on residential property. Attachment 3 8. Menards shall store all their materials within the fenced storage area. 9. Sanitation facilities shall be provided by Menards for the employees. 10. The proposed building addition building construction and site work must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 11. The perimeter of the building must be kept accessible for fire emergencies. The applicant shall arrange with the fire marshal for access through the gate behind the building in the case of emergencies. 12. All existing vegetation that is required to be preserved and proposed vegetation must be properly maintained and cared for. Any dead planting materials must be replaced in a timely manner. 13.All existing trees between the County Road B East right-of-way line and the 30- foot building and fence setback line must be maintained and are not permitted to be removed. 14. The warehouse building shall be setback at least 50 feet from all residential property lines to the east and west of Menard Inc.’s property. 15. Any temporary, seasonal, outdoor sales occurring in the parking lot must meet all City ordinance requirements, plus are required to be setback at least 100 feet from any residential property line. 16. A parking waiver is approved for this site. The applicant shall provide a minimum of 420 parking spaces. 17. A setback waiver from Magellan Pipelines’ pipeline is approved. No permanent structures may be built within the easement (Ramsey County Recorded Document No. 1594242) but there is no additional setback outside out of the easement area required. 18.Before any permits are issued, the applicant shall be required to implement additional stormwater management practices – above what is minimally required by ordinance for this site – as approved by the city engineer. Before any permits are issued, the city engineer will be required to approve plans confirming all requirements related to the shoreland overlay impervious surface ordinance are met. __________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on February 10, 2020. Attachment 4 VACATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2280 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE AND 1155 COUNTY ROAD B EAST RESOLUTION Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Nicholas Brenner of Menard, Inc. has petitioned the Maplewood City Council to vacate public utility easements located within the properties located at 2280 Maplewood Drive and 1155 County Road B East. 1.02 The easement areas are legally described as follows, to wit: The South fifty feet of the East fifty-three feet of the West five hundred thirty-eight feet (S.50 of E.53 of W.538); and also, the South twenty feet of the West four hundred eighty-five feet (S.20 of W.485); of Block Ten (10), Clifton Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County; Also, The West thirty feet of the West one hundred forty-seven feet of the East three hundred nine feet (W.30 of W.147 of E.309) of Block Nine (9), Clifton Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County, subject to streets. 1.03 A hearing notice on said petition was published in the City of Maplewood’s official newspaper and written notice was mailed to the property owners within 500 feet of subject properties. 1.03 On February 10, 2020 the City Council held a hearing on such petition, at which time all persons for and against the granting of said petition were heard. Section 2. Standards 2.01 Minnesota state statutes requires that no vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The Maplewood City Council makes the following findings: 1. There is no anticipated public need for the utility easements. 2. The vacation is not counter to the public interest. 4.01 The city council vacates the above-described public utility easements, subject to the following conditions: Attachment 4 1. This vacation is only valid upon the properties being developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans: a. Site plan, date-stamped January 9, 2020. b. Design plans, date-stamped December 24, 2019. ____________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on February 10, 2020. Attachment 5 RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE AND DESIGN PLANS AND A LOT DIVISION TO COMBINE SEVEN PROPERTIES FOR MENARD INC. AT 2280 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE; AND, 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 AND 1155 COUNTY ROAD B EAST Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Nicholas Brenner of Menard, Inc. has requested approval of site and design plans and a lot division to combine seven properties. 1.02 The property located at 2280 Maplewood Drive is legally described as: That certain triangle of land situated in the Southwest quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, described as follows to wit: Commencing at a point on the East line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 9 at its intersection with the easterly line of United States Highway No. 61, as widened; thence South on the East line of said Southwest quarter to a point 100 feet North of the North line of County Road "B" thence West and parallel with the North line of said County Road "B" to the Easterly line of United States Highway No. 61, as widened; thence Northeasterly along the Easterly line of said United States Highway No. 61, as widened, to the point of beginning. Less and except that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the east line of said Southwest Quarter and a line parallel with, distant 100.00 feet north of the north right of way line of County Road B; thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 33 seconds West, along said east line 105.40 feet to the intersection with the westerly extension of the north line of Block 2 of Heinemann's Belleview Addition to Gladstone; thence North 08 degrees 02 minutes,44 seconds West 140.00 feet more or less to the southeasterly right of way line of United States Highway No. 61, as widened; thence southwesterly 268 feet more or less along said southeasterly right of way line to the intersection with a line parallel with, distant 100 feet north of the north right of way line of County Road B; thence North 89 degrees 18 minutes 48 seconds East, along said parallel line 125 feet more or less to the point of beginning. And: The South 107 feet of that part of the North 5 acres of the South 50 rods of the North 105 rods of the West 32 rods of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, which lies Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said 5 acre tract which line is the South line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter, distant 60 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence running Northeasterly to the Northeast comer of said tract and there terminating. And All that part of the West 32 rods of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range22,lying North of County Road "B", except Heinemann's Belleview addition to Gladstone, and except highway. Attachment 5 The properties located at 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 and 1155 County Road B East are legally described as: PIN: 092922430011 – Block 9, except the Easterly 594 feet and Westerly 104 feet thereof, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430010 – Block 9, except the Easterly 594 feet and Westerly 104 feet thereof, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430009 – The West 62 ft. of the East 594 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430008 – The West 52 ft. of the East 532 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430007 – The West 171 ft. of the East 480 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota AND PIN: 092922430006 – The West 147 ft. of the East 309 ft. of Block 9, Clifton Addition, Ramsey, County, Minnesota. 1.03 On January 21, 2020, the community design review board reviewed this request. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information to the community design review board. The community design review board considered all of the comments received and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into this resolution. Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the Attachment 5 harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. 2.02 City ordinance Section34-14(a) states a lot division shall not result in the creation of more than three lots. Section 3. City Council Action. 3.01.1 The above-described site and designs plans and lot division to combine seven properties are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan date-stamped January 9, 2020 and the design plans date-stamped December 24, 2019. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3. Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated January 13, 2020. 4. Meet all requirements in the environmental report, dated January 13, 2020. 5. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 6. All rooftop equipment shall be screened. 7. Signage for this site is not approved. All signs require permits. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a. A photometric plan that meets all city requirements which include limiting light intensity to 0.4 footcandles at all property lines and limits light pole height to 25 feet in height. b. Payment to the city’s tree fund to meet the requirements of the city’s tree replacement code. c. The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. d. A revised landscaping plan show increasing the number of trees to be planted between the fence and County Road B East right-of-way line from 7 Attachment 5 to 14. At least 50 percent of the newly added trees shall be coniferous. In addition, the revised landscape plan shall reflect any trees removed due to grading within the Maplewood Drive right-of-way being replaced by the requirements of the Maplewood City Engineer. e. Revised building elevations with the following revisions: 1. All concrete block proposed on the main building and warehouse is required to be replaced with a brick façade. The brick faced must contain two complimentary colors. 2. Additional windows and architectural elements added to the left (north) elevation. 3. The columns supporting the main buildings main entrance canopy shall be built with stone and wood facade materials. f. A revised site plan with the following revisions: 1. Elimination of the access drive south of the stormwater pond on the west side of the site. Green space must be maintained between the stormwater pond and the residential property to the south. 2. New location of the warehouse building, storage yard area and fence locations that are in compliance of the setback requirements outlined in the conditional use permit resolution. 3. Showing all construction of the project is taking place within property owned by Menard Inc. No construction is permitted on neighboring properties. 9. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. c. Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d. Install all required outdoor lighting. e. Restore all former curb cuts on Maplewood Drive to a continuous concrete curb per City of Maplewood requirements. 10. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. Attachment 5 b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 11. The lot division approval is subject to the following conditions: a. A survey shall be submitted to staff with a legal description for a new single parcel reflecting the seven properties being combined. b. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new commercial building, proof that Ramsey County has recorded the lot division must be submitted to city staff. 12. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. __________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on February 10, 2020. Attachment 6 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 1155 County Road B East November 20, 2019 City of Maplewood Legend ! I 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Attachment 7 November 20, 2019 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Future Land Use - 2040 Low Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed-Use - Community Commercial Open Space Park 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Attachment 8 November 20, 2019 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Zoning Open Space/Park Single Dwelling (r1) Double Dwelling (r2) Multiple Dwelling (r3) Farm (f) Light Manufacturing (m1) 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Attachment 9 November 21, 2019 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Shoreland Overlay 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Attachment 10 November 20, 2019 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Future Land Use - 2040 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Attachment 11 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application – Menard, Inc. 1115-1155 County Road B East Narrative: Menard, Inc. (“Menards”) is requesting that the comprehensive plan be amended to change the land use for the residential lots with the following addresses: 1115, 1127, 1133, 1137, 1143 and 1155 County Road B East, Maplewood, MN from Low Density Residential to Mixed-Use Commercial. This request is to accommodate a new Menards store, which store layout will be consistent with other twin city locations. Menards has been operating at this location since 1989. Since that time, the standard Menards store has changed dramatically. As a result, over the years a number of remodels and expansions to the Maplewood store has occurred; all in an attempt to continue to provide the best possible service to those who shop at the store. Since the last expansion in 2009, a company-wide expansion was rolled out to the stores. Almost 300 Menard stores have been or are in the process of being remodeled with the Maplewood store being one of the last remaining. This latest remodel is the company’s attempt to compete against online retailers and provides the stores with a new express lane at the gate canopy and a new special order/online order pickup area. Unfortunately, due to property size constraints, this latest expansion is not possible as the store currently lays out. Therefore a more aggressive avenue must occur. Menards is proposing replace the existing store with its current single story prototype. Due to the odd configuration of the lot, plus a gas pipeline that runs through the middle of the lot, additional property is required in order to fit the store, outdoor yard, accessory building and parking. Therefore, six residential properties to the south of the existing lot are required to be introduced into the Menards existing lot. This new store would contain all the services that other Menards store have including the express lane and order pickup area mentioned above. Even with the additional property, the site is extremely tight and barely fits these facilities. Essentially there is only one plan that works for this site. Since the new store operation would not be significantly different than what is there today, there should be no negative impacts to the utilities in the area. Overall, it is Menards desire to remain at this location. The citizens that shop this store deserve to have the same experience as any other person at any other store. In order to make this happen, the proposed project will need to move forward which means the requested comprehensive plan amendment will need to be approved. At the end of the day the city should approve this request because it will allow Menards to build a brand new store thereby cementing Menards presence in the community. Attachment 11 Attachment 11 Attachment 11 Attachment 11 Attachment 11 Attachment 11 Attachment 12 Attachment 13 120 feet CIV-101 60 FILE NO. MENAR 147393 0 30 60 scale SITE LAYOUT MAPLEWOOD SITE DESIGN ROW FENCE (TYP) FENCE (TYP) MINNESOTA MAPLEWOOD, STORMWATER POND 54263 YARD DANIEL D. LANDRUS, P.E.Lic. No. WAREHOUSE PRODUCT STORAGE YARD PRODUCT STORAGE PROPERTY LINE 11/27/19 GARDEN CENTER Date: SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT STORE YARD PROPOSED MENARDS ST. CLOUD, MN 56302-1717www.sehinc.com PHONE: 320.229.43001200 25TH AVENUE SOUTHP.O. BOX 1717 PRODUCT STORAGE FP EO ROW FENCE (TYP) 3131 1:- PARKING LOT Kbo PROPERTY LINE qn- REVISIONS 4;2: bu ISSUED FOR REVIEWISSUED FOR REVIEW STORMWATER POND Nbsujo _ DATE 01/09/202012/20/2019 _ BY CMMCMM __ BA NO. Njdibfm DDLDDL MJW DESIGN TEAM Cz DRAWN BY:DESIGNER:CHECKED BY: 3504SL.dwgSave: 1/9/2020 11:00 AM cmaki Plot: 1/9/2020 12:32 PM X:\\KO\\M\\MENAR\\153504\\5-final-dsgn\\51-drawings\\10-Civil\\cad\\dwg\\sheet\\ME15 Attachment 14 788 4220 1214141418 Quantity 1-2' 30-60' Maturity Width At 4-6'4-5'575-6'5-6'3-5'3-5'552-5'4-8'502-3' 3-12'3-12'30 6-12"4-10' 1.5-2.5'2-3'33 Maturity Height At 3 Gal.3 Gal.3 Gal.3 Gal.3 Gal.3 Gal. 1 Gal.1 Gal. Size At Planting 2.5" Dia.40-60'40-60'2.5" Dia.40-80'2.5" Dia.40-60'40-60' 1.75" Dia.20-30'15-25'1.75" Dia.35-40'20-25'1.75" Dia.15-25'10-20'101.75" Dia.20-30'25-35'91.75" Dia.40-70'40-60' Existing Trees Sod/Hydroseed Botanical, Common Name Ilex vertticillata, Winterberry Goldstrum black-eyed Susan Acer saccharum, Sugar Maple Cercis canadensis, Eastern Redbud Microbiota decussata, Siberian CypressSymphoricarpos orbiculatus, Coralberry1 1/2" River Rock (Landscape Planters) 4-8" Rip Rap Stone (Behind Warehouse) Betula nigra 'Heritage', Heritage River Birch Rudbeckia fulgida var. sullivantii 'Goldstrum', Hydrangea arborescens, Smooth Hydrangea Pyrus calleryana 'Aristocrat', Aristocrat Callery Pear Spiraea japonica 'Little Princess', Little Princess SpireaEuonymus alatus 'Compactus', Compact Burning Bush Acer rubrum 'Painted Sunset', Painted Sunset Red Maple Malus x hubrid 'Prairiefire', Prairiefire Flowering Crabapple Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk', ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac Berberis thunbergii 'Rose Glow', Rose Glow Japansese Barberry Celtis occidentalis 'Prairie Pride', Prairie Pride Common Hackberry " 3 - ' 6 Symbol 153'-1" " 5'-0 " 4 - ' 4 2 29'-4" " 0 - ' 3" 1 1 - ' 3'-0" 3 3 YARD ENTRANCE GATE CANOPY 18'-9" " 0 - ' 0 4 " 4 - ' 7 5 1 '-0" 5 " 3 - ' 2 1 1 " 0 - ' 0 6 " 4 - ' 4 6 3 . O 4.41± ACRES449 PARKING SPACES -8 CART CORRAL SPACES441 TOTAL PARKING SPACES OUTSIDE YARD AREA 192,139± SQ. FT. N Y A W H " 5'-0 G I H E " 4 9'-6" - ' A V 9 I T R O D S FP E EO D N O N " O 8 - I' 7 MW " E 7 - ' L 6 3 P 6' TALL WOOD FENCE A M EXISTING FLAG POLE B RO T AR E NE G T .NE .TIB CCA R D EM R POF -US BUNA STR T " 0 - A ' 0 3 O R Y T " 0 - ' 0 N 3 U O C 1 6 . O N Y A W H G I H S U Attachment 15 ACCENT PANEL PROFILE CLEAR PANEL TO MATCH EMERALD GREENMETAL ACCENT PANEL INTERNALLY LIGHTED"MENARDS LETTERS W/SWOOSH" SIGN ORANGE METAL ACCENTPANELSGREEN STEEL COVEREDCONVEYOR COVER UNPAINTED TAN SPLIT FACE BLOCK FINISHED FLOORELEV. 100'-0" TOP OF BUILDING ELEV. 130'-1 1/2"CONCRETE PIERS w/TANBELGIAN BLOCK ALL SIDES OF LOADING EMERALD GREEN TRIM ONDOCK (BEYOND) TYPICAL DOWNSPOUT ROOF SCUPPER SCUPPER SINGLE PLY ROOF MEMBRANE EMERALD GREEN TRIM EMERALD GREEN TRIM STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMN PAINTED EMERALD GREENUNPAINTED TAN SPLIT FACE BLOCK EMERALD GREEN METAL ACCENT PANELS AND TRIM RECESSED LOADINGDOCK AND FENCING ROOF SCUPPER CONCRETE PIERS EMERALD GREEN TRIM w/TAN BELGIAN BLOCK EMERALD GREENMETAL ACCENT PANEL COMPACTOR OPENING STORE ENTRANCE BEYOND OVERHEAD DOOR W/ GREEN STEEL COVER SINGLE PLY ROOF MEMBRANE ACCENT PANELS EMERALD GREEN METAL UNPAINTED TAN SPLIT FACE BLOCK RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 4 12 3 CT2 CT2CT2 CT2 EMERALD GREEN CAP TRIMEMERALD GREEN CAP TRIM UNPAINTED TAN SPLIT FACE BLOCK 24'-3 1/2" A.F.F. BOTTOM OF PRODUCT SIGNS AT EMERALD GREEN TRIM INTERNALLY LIGHTED "MENARDS SLOGAN" SIGN CENTERED ON WALL @ 10'-10" A.F.F. TO BOTTOM OF SIGN LUMINAIRE B.O. CUTOFF ELEV. 123'-9" EMERALD GREEN ACCENT PANELS ACCENT PANELS STEEL CANOPY CLEAR POLYCARBONATE PANEL INTERNALLY LIGHTEDINTERNALLY LIGHTED"MENARDS LETTERS W/SWOOSH" SIGN"MENARDS LETTERS W/SWOOSH" SIGNCENTERED ON CANOPYCENTERED ON CANOPY 4' HIGH EMERALD GREEN METAL CUTOFF LUMINAIRES CONCRETE PIERS w/ TAN BELGIAN BLOCK INTERNALLY LIGHTED"MENARDS LETTERS W/SWOOSH" SIGN ORANGE METAL ACCENT PANELS CLEAR POLYCARBONATE PANEL HANGAR-STYLE BI-FOLD DOORS EMERALD GREEN METAL ACCENT PANEL EMERALD GREEN TRIM OVERFLOW SCUPPER EMERALD GREEN TRIM ON ALL SIDES OFLOADING DOCK (BEYOND) BUILDING ONLY EMERALD GREEN ACCENT PANELS PAINTED ON FRONT OF EMERALD GREEN STRIPE ACCENT PANELS BLOCK (BEYOND)BLOCK (BEYOND) EMERALD GREEN ELEV. 100'-0" FINISHED FLOOR EMERALD GREEN METAL UNPAINTED TAN SPLIT FACE BLOCK EXIT CANOPY PIER w/ BELGIAN SINGLE PLY ROOF MEMBRANE ENTRANCE CANOPY PIER w/ BELGIAN RECESSED LOADING DOCK STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMN PAINTED CONVEYOR COVER GREEN STEEL COVERED Attachment 15 ROOF PEAKELEV=130'-3"ROOFELEV=123'-3"T.O. SLABELEV=100'-0" ROOF PEAKTRUSS BEARINGELEV=120'-0"T.O. SLABELEV=100'-0" ROOF PEAKELEV=130'-3"T.O. SLABELEV=100'-0" EMERALD GREEN TRIM EMERALD GREEN TRIM BEAM RAMP EMERALD GREEN TRIM WHITE UNIVERSAL RIDGE CAP SUPPLIED BY MENARD, INC. LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 3 CT3 WHITE UNIVERSAL RIDGE CAP 3'-0"x11'-0" CLEAR POLYCARBONATE PANEL 8" TAN SPLIT-FACE CONCRETE BLOCK EMERALD GREEN PRO RIB STEEL SIDING BLOCK ROOFELEV=123'-3" EMERALD GREEN TRIM 8" GRAY SMOOTH CONCRETE REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 4 1 CT3 ROOF CT3 WHITE PRO RIB STEEL ROOF PANEL.SUPPLIED BY MENARD INC. ELEV=123'-3" WALKWAY EMERALD GREEN TRIM 3'-0"x11'-0" CLEAR POLYCARBONATE PANEL EMERALD GREEN PRO RIB STEEL SIDING WHITE UNIVERSAL RIDGE CAP.SEE DETAIL 5 SHEET WA-51 WHITE UNIVERSAL RIDGE CAP RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 CT3 BUMP-OUT EVENLY SPACED AS SHOWN (4) 8" DEEPx4'-0" WIDE CONCRETE BLOCK WHITE PRO RIB STEEL ROOF SUPPLIED BY MENARD, INC. EMERALD GREEN TRIM TRUSS SUPPORTING PALLET RACKING (ASSEMBLED BYGENERAL CONTRACTOR) EMERALD GREEN TRIM T.O. SLAB ROOF PEAK ELEV=130'-3"ELEV=100'-0" EMERALD GREEN TRIM Attachment 16 Attachment 16 Attachment 17 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: Menard Inc. PROJECT NO: 20-02 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Assistant City Engineer DATE: 1-13-2020 PLAN SET: Engineering plans dated 12-12-2019 REPORTS: Stormwater Calculations – Dated 12-19-2019 The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building and construct a new Menards store, outdoor yard, and accompanying site improvements. The applicant is also proposing to purchase six residential lots and incorporate them into the site. The applicant is requesting review of the current design and vacation of two utility easements. The amount of disturbance on this site is greater than ½ acre. As such, the applicant is required to meet the City’s stormwater quality, rate control, and other stormwater management requirements. Additionally, a portion of this project lies within the Shoreland Overlay District, which requires water quality improvements above and beyond those set forth in the City’s standard stormwater management requirements. The applicant is proposing to meet the City stormwater management requirements via the use of an infiltration basin, a pond, and an underground stormwater storage system. From the information submitted, it appears that the proposed design meets the City’s stormwater management requirements as it pertains to rate control. Further information is needed to ensure the project meets the City’s volume reduction and additional Shoreland Overlay requirements as is further discussed in this report. As this property is being utilized in a similar means in the proposed condition, it is not anticipated that traffic will change greatly from the existing conditions. Negative impacts to the surrounding roadway network are not anticipated. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents and calculations for final review. The following are engineering review comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Drainage and Stormwater Management This site lies within the Keller Lake subwatershed. A majority of the site lies within the Shoreland Overlay District for Keller Lake as well. The existing site area (excluding the six residential lots) is 95% covered with impervious surfaces. This existing portion of the site is proposed to have a slight reduction in impervious surfaces due to additional greenspace and ponding areas. As such, no variance from the impervious surface coverage allowance is needed for this portion of the site. Attachment 17 Staff is supportive of a shoreland overlay impervious surface coverage maximum of 80 percent for the newly incorporated residential lots portion of the site, requiring a 40% variance above ordinance limits. This bonus would require the inclusion of additional facilities for the treatment of runoff. To achieve the bonus, the applicant is required to infiltrate 1.65-inches of runoff (a 50% increase over the standard volume reduction requirement) for all impervious surfaces above the 40% maximum allowed in the newly acquired residential lot portion of the site. The applicant is still required to meet the standard volume reduction requirements for the first 40% impervious. 1) A stormwater management report, and accompanying calculations shall be submitted detailing how the project is meeting the City’s stormwater management requirements, as well as the additional requirements required to achieve impervious surface coverage bonuses required by the Shoreland Overlay Ordinance. 2) The project shall be submitted to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) for review. All conditions of RWMWD shall be met. 3) A joint storm water maintenance agreement shall be prepared and signed by the owner for the proposed infiltration systems and storm sewer. The Owner shall submit a signed copy of the joint storm-water maintenance agreement with the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District to the City. 4) Soil boring information shall be submitted to support the infiltration rates utilized in the stormwater calculations. 5) The underground stormwater storage systems shall contain adequate access points or cleanouts to ensure the system can be properly inspected and maintained. 6) Emergency overland overlflows shall be identified for the basins and underground storage system. These overflow areas shall be stabilized to prevent scour and erosion. Emergency overflows shall be routed such that they do not negatively impact neighboring properties. 7) Pre-treatment devices (sump manhole, etc.) shall be provided upstream of all discharge points into infiltration basins, ponds, underground stormwater systems, or offsite locations. 8) Additional storm sewer detail is needed on the plan sheets. The applicant shall provide pipe size, slopes, and material types on the plan view. Likewise, invert elevations shall be shown on the plan view of the site. 9) Minimum storm sewer pipe slope is 0.50%. 10) Scour protection (Rip-Rap, etc.) shall be provided at all storm sewer outlets. Attachment 17 Grading and Erosion Control 11) A significant amount of fill is proposed in the southern portion of the site. The applicant shall ensure that the placement of this fill does not negatively impact the drainage on adjacent properties. Runoff from adjacent properties shall be accommodated by the proposed site design. This is particularly noteworthy in the southeast portion of the project. 12) An erosion control plan shall be provided prior to the issuance of any permits. 13) All slopes shall be 3H:1V or flatter. 14) Inlet protection devices shall be installed on all existing and proposed onsite storm sewer until all exposed soils onsite are stabilized. This includes storm sewer on adjacent streets that could potentially receive construction related sediment or debris. 15) Perimeter control devices (Silt fence, Bio-rolls, etc.) are required and shall be shown on the erosion control plan. 16) A stabilized site entrance is required to minimize sediment tracking onto adjacent streets. The stabilized entrance shall be noted on the plans. 17) The proposed perimeter wall shall not block the flow of drainage from adjacent properties onto the site. This is particularly important along the southeast portion of the site. 18) Adjacent streets and parking areas shall be swept as needed to keep the pavement clear of sediment and construction debris. 19) All pedestrian facilities shall be ADA compliant. 20) The total grading volume (cut/fill) shall be noted on the plans. 21) A copy of the project SWPPP and NDPES Permit shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 22) Infiltration basins shall be planted with plant types that thrive in areas subject to inundation by stormwater. A planting plan shall be submitted detailing plant species within the proposed infiltration areas. These plans are subject to review by the City’s Natural Resources Coordinator. Attachment 17 Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 23) The proposed sanitary sewer service is shown tying into the Metropolitan Council Interceptor Line along Maplewood Drive. This proposed connection shall be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. All requirements of the Metropolitan Council shall be met prior to the issuance of permits from the City. 24) It is unclear from the plans which portions of the existing onsite sanitary sewer system are to remain, be removed, or be abandoned in place. The applicant shall provide additional details on changes to the sanitary sewer system. 25) The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project. 26) All modifications to the water system shall be reviewed by Saint Paul regional Water Services. All requirements of SPRWS shall be met. 27) All new sanitary sewer service piping shall be schedule 40 PVC or SDR35. Other 28) An existing right-turn lane currently accesses one of the existing entrances. Alterations to the existing site entrance locations off of Maplewood Drive are proposed, which make this turn lane obsolete. The applicant shall detail what alterations are proposed along Maplewood Drive. These modifications are subject to further review and requirements through the City’s right-of-way ordinance. 29) The most southerly proposed site access is located within a long-bend in Maplewood Drive. The location of this entrance would require motorists seeking to head southbound on Maplewood Drive to look beyond 90-degrees to view oncoming traffic. The applicant shall review the proposed entrance locations to ensure adequate sight distance is available. 30) A right-of-way permit and drainage permit shall be obtained from MnDot for any work done within the State right-of-way along Highway 61. 31) A right-of-way permit shall be obtained from Ramsey County for any work done within the County right-of-way along County Road B. 32) The Magellan Pipelines lie within an easement that crosses the middle of the property. The applicant shall have the project reviewed by Magellan Pipelines and meet any requirements they may have. 33) The applicant has requested the vacation of two existing utility easements on the property, described in easement document #1526919. These utility easements were Attachment 17 initially obtained to cover sanitary sewer mainlines in the easement areas. These sanitary sewer mainlines have since been abandoned. Thus, these easements are no longer needed and staff agrees with their vacation. 34) The applicant shall ensure that no trees are planted over the existing sanitary sewer mainline along the southwest portion of the parking lot. 35) Access to public utilities within the site shall be maintained. The applicant shall ensure that adequate space is maintained from the proposed perimeter wall to these utilities. Public Works Permits The following permits are required at a minimum by the Maplewood Public Works Department for this project. The applicant should verify the need for other City permits with the Building Department. 36) City Right-Of-Way Permit 37) Demolition Permit 38) Grading and erosion control permit 39) Storm Sewer Permit 40) Sanitary Sewer Permit - END COMMENTS - Attachment 18 Environmental Review Project:Menards Location: 2280 Maplewood Drive East Date of Plans: Tree Removals and Mitigation - December 20, 2019 Overall Landscape Plan – November 15, 2019 Date of Review: January 13, 2020 Reviewer: Shann Finwall, AICP, Environmental Planner Emily Dunlap, Natural Resources Coordinator Project Background Menards is proposing to redevelop their site at 2280 Maplewood Drive East with a new store. Six residential lots located along County Road B East will also be redeveloped as part of the store and storage yards. There are hundreds of significant trees located on the properties, much of the land to be redeveloped is located within the Shoreland Overlay District for Keller Lake, and there are infiltration basins proposed to help manage stormwater on the site. The applicant must comply with the City’s tree preservation ordinance, Shoreland Overlay District, and infiltration basin plantings and overall landscape policies. 1. Trees a. Tree Preservation Ordinance: Maplewood’s tree preservation ordinance describes a significant tree as a hardwood tree with a minimum of 6 inches in diameter, an evergreen tree with a minimum of 8 inches in diameter, and a softwood tree with a minimum of 12 inches in diameter. A specimen tree is defined as a healthy tree of any species which is 28 inches in diameter or greater. The ordinance requires any significant tree removed to be replaced based on a tree mitigation calculation. The calculation takes into account the size of a tree and bases replacement on that size. The calculation also allows credits to the final tree replacement when preserving specimen trees (defined as a healthy tree that is 28 inches in diameter or greater). b. Tree Impacts: There are 193 significant trees, equaling 3,293 diameter inches, of significant trees located on all properties included in the redevelopment. The applicant is proposing to remove all 193 significant trees. Not shown on the tree plan is grading work within the Maplewood Drive right-of-way, which will likely require the removal of additional trees. Based on the significant trees shown on the plan (not including right-of-way trees), the City’s tree replacement calculation requires the replacement of 3,951.6 caliper inches of trees. The applicant’s overall landscape plan includes 88 new trees, for a total of 181 caliper inches of replacement trees. This is 3,734.6 caliper inches (or 1,867 – 2-caliper inch trees) less than City code 1 Attachment 18 requires. The applicant must modify the tree removal and planting plan to meet City code, or pay into the City’s tree fund at a rate of $60 per caliper inch of tree that cannot be replaced on site. The current plan would require the applicant to pay $226,236 into the City’s tree fund. c. Tree Preservation Recommendations: 1) Submit a revised tree plan with the following changes: a) Location, size, and species of all trees located in the Maplewood Drive right-of-way where grading will take place, and identify which of those trees will be removed. b) Preservation of the following trees: a) All existing trees south of the existing 8-foot-tall fence and the properties at 1071, 1081 and 1101 County Road B. b) All existing trees between the County Road B East right-of- way line and the 30-foot building and fence setback line. c) New tree removal calculations based on changes outlined above. d) Tree protection plan showing how trees scheduled to be preserved will be protected during development per the City’s tree standards. 2) Submit a tree replacement plan with the following changes: a) Addition of trees around the green space and infiltration basin located on the west side of the lot, adjacent Maplewood Drive. b) Addition of trees within the Maplewood Drive right-of-way, adjacent the parking lot and building. 3) Submit a cash escrow or letter of credit to cover 150% of the tree replacement requirements. 2. Shoreland Overlay District a. Shoreland Ordinance: The property is located in the Shoreland Overlay District for Keller Lake. Keller Lake is classified as a Class III Public Water. City code allows up to 40 percent impervious surface coverage, or 60 percent with stormwater best management practice bonuses. b. Existing Conditions: The current Menard’s property has 95 percent impervious surface coverage. Redevelopment of this portion of the property is proposed to have a slight reduction in impervious surfaces due to additional greenspace and ponding areas. Because of existing conditions, no variance is required for this 2 Attachment 18 portion of the development as long as there is less than 95 percent impervious surface. c. Shoreland District Impervious Surface Impacts: Three of the residential properties are located within the Shoreland Overlay District (58,781square feet). The applicant is proposing 100 percent impervious surface coverage with the redevelopment of these sites. A 60 percent impervious surface coverage variance (or 40 percent impervious surface coverage variance if stormwater management best practice bonuses are applied) is required for this development. d. Shoreland Overlay District Recommendations: The applicant can reduce the amount of impervious surface by shifting the warehouse building away from the County Road B East right-of-way line by 30 feetas outlined in the staff report. Additionally, the applicant should work with the city engineer to implement stormwater best management practice bonuses such as the use of porous concrete to further reduce the amount of impervious surface. 3. Overall Landscaping Due to the likelihood of these species becoming invasive, the following plants listed in the Landscape Plan need to be substituted: a. Bereris thunbergii ‘Rose Glow’, Rose Glow Japanese Barberry b. Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii) is not allowed to be planted, due to its potential to become an invasive species in woodlands. Japanese barberry is spread by birds eating the fruit and dispersing seed to new locations. Even if a barberry shrub is not planted near a natural area, there is potential for the plant to spread unless it’s a completely sterile cultivar. Twenty-six cultivars of Japanese barberry are listed under the Minnesota Noxious Weed Law in the Restricted category. These cultivars are being phased out of sale in Minnesota because they produce 600 seeds or greater per plant. The cultivar ‘Rose Glow’ is included on that list. A recommended substitution for Japanese barberry is red osier dogwood. c. Euonymus alatus ‘Compactus’, Compact Burning bush. Due to its potential to become an invasive species, burning bush (Euonymus alatus) is not recommended. The shrubs can be prolific seeders and are spread to natural areas by birds eating the seeds. A longtime invasive species in the eastern US, burning bush is now starting to invade Minnesota woodlands. Suggested substitutes include serviceberry, chokeberry, or red osier dogwood. 4. Infiltration Basins All infiltration basins are required to be planted, ideally with deep-rooted native plants. The city requires a portion of the basin to be planted rather than seeded; typically a minimum of 5,000 square feet of plantings are required on large basins. Using plants rather than seeds hastens establishment and provides a better chance of successful establishment. Basin bottoms and lower elevations almost never establish successfully 3 Attachment 18 from seed since the seed is washed away when stormwater flows into the basin. Please provide the following: a. A landscape drawing for each infiltration basin, including list of species, container size, spacing, and quantities. b. If proposing seeding the bottom of the basins, provide explanation of measures that will be taken to ensure seed does not wash away. c. For any area using a native seed mix (ex: pond slopes), provide information on maintenance for planting year, Year 2 and Year 3, addressing what maintenance activities will be required and what entity (developer, owner, etc.) will take on this responsibility. 4 Attachment 19 Attachment 19 Attachment 19 Attachment 19 Attachment 19 Attachment 19 Attachment 19 Attachment 20 The following notes are from Jean Anderson and Judy Zielinski at 2255 Duluth Street, Maplewood, which is directly behind the Menards store. We have quoted from the MENARDS document first and then followed by discussion that basically opposes what they wrote. At the end of this are some additional comments from both of us. MENARDS: ÐThis request will actually improve traffic congestion on County Road B East, because six houses that have driveways directly onto County Road B East will be removed eliminating turn movements.Ñ REALLY???? We have noticed that for a couple years now the traffic has been very light on Co. Rd. B. One thing that probably helped is the English exit from Highway 36 which helps those coming to Menards and other homes in the area from avoiding Co. Rd. B. Six driveways will NOT impact this at all. They are long and those coming out of them can be facing the road and not backing up. This is a very poor argument from Menards. REALLY???? MENARDS: Conserving Property Values - ÐProperty values in the immediate vicinity should not change with this request. Overall the appearance of this area will be better than it is today?Ñ We found the following statement from this online resource: https://www.maxpropertiesllc.com/how-does-commercial- development-impact-your-property-value/ ÐAny conscious, concerned homeowner is definitely going to want to know the impact of new or existing commercial property nearby on their property values. And much of the impact depends on the proximity to your property, according to a Homebase/The Center for Common Concerns report. Those larger commercial developments and projects as tend to have a much greater impact Î a negative one Î on your home values.Ñ There is no way that Menards is able to guarantee that our property value will not go down. Added to this the property taxes for the properties that will remain, \[on Co. Rd. B and Duluth Street\] WILL increase. There is nothing stated in this entire document regarding how this will affect our property taxes. If any remaining neighbor wants to sell their home in the future, this development will surely negatively impact their sale. MENARDS: ÐThe outside yard may be getting closer to some residential properties.Ñ Because of this proximity to our properties, this will negatively impact our properties here on Duluth Street regarding our houses directly in back of Menards, with VERY limited space between our properties. We are sure this impact will be felt with the homes left on the north side of Co. Rd. B. also. MENARDS: They have indicated that the outside yard may be getting closer to some residential properties but the accessory building, fence and landscaping will do wonders in keeping the noise and light from spilling out of the site onto adjacent lands. Perhaps you should ask those that live across Co. Rd. B., and also right behind the store \[on Duluth St.\], and how the light and noise will go over the fence when they are in their homes? When Menards mentions that the appearance of this area will be better Î REALLY???? Basically they are changing an existing neighborhood and NOT improving it at all. There is a discrepancy as to the height of the fence and is it the same type of fence and size all around. Question: How is the noise and light not going to Ðspill outÑ to adjacent lands? Attachment 20 MENARDS: ÐFrom a neighborhood perspective, not a lot is changing with this request.Ñ Are they serious? They are changing the whole face of this neighborhood. This is an old established neighborhood with well made, affordable, middle class houses, that have been well kept up with nice yards. The trees have been here for a very long time and it takes YEARS to get to where they are now. We know that an EIS is not necessary for this type of development, but we wish one would be done or at least looked at how this will affect the environment. Question: There is an old Ðsewer lift roadÑ that runs from Co. Rd. B. adjacent to 1143 and 1155. Is this still active and how will it affect those homes around it? MENARDS: ÐAlthough the site is tight when it comes to fitting all the facilities, it will be much improved than what exists today.Ñ ÐEven with the additional property, the site is extremely tight and barely fits these facilities. Essentially there is only one plan that works for this site.Ñ In all of the comments from Menards it was mentioned at least twice \[above\], if not three times, that this property is an unusual shaped piece of land along with the problem of a gas line, and it is VERY TIGHT. They why are they even thinking of putting it here? IsnÓt there another location that can fit their needs better. MENARDS: ÐAll of these items \[Menards is proposing\] will ease the transition between commercial and residential, meaning that neighboring property owners will be able to utilize their properties as they do today with very little, if any, change.Ñ However, this is really untrue. The changes will affect those that live next to the proposed development, behind the proposed development \[Duluth Street\], and across the street \[on Co. Rd. B\]. It will literally change the entire environment of our nice existing neighborhood. Is that what Menards means? To us, and this may also be a bit of emotion, Menards has ONLY ONE thing in mind and it is NOT the neighborhood that is being affected, NOT AT ALL!!!! QUESTION: How tall will the fence along Co. Rd. B. be? We were informed it would be 6 ft. Have you asked those that live on the opposite side of Co. Rd. B how they will be affected? We doubt it. We have heard that noise AND light will be shining into their front yard from Menards. Also homes on Day Road near Co. Rd. B. may be affected. MENARDS: ÐMenards desires to remain at this location. In order to make this happen the proposed project will need to move forward which means the requested rezone will need to be approved.Ñ From this paragraph Menards is indicating they need THIS PROPOSAL and not willing to compromise. Are they even willing to work with the city and especially the existing neighborhood at all? NOTE: We have spent a lot of thought and time on this and hope that our comments will mean something to the City of Maplewood when they make a decision. We have heard from others that are not even taking the time to put their thoughts/comments down on paper as they figure, Ðwhat Menards wants to do is what will happen.Ñ That is so wrong as we as neighbors should count way more than any sized business who wants to make major changes in the landscape of a neighborhood, should count. After all, it is OUR neighborhood, NOT Menards. We also hope that everyone who is involved with making the decision, which will impact several lives, will read this and other comments that are sent in opposing this development. If you have ANY questions on this, please call either Judy Zielinski \[651-774-3161\] or Jean Anderson \[651-779-9274\]. OUR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Attachment 20 Environmentally there is a drastic change with the old trees on these properties. Large trees that have been there for years. This new change will drastically affect the look of our neighborhood and the homes of wildlife. Added to this the homes are older, well built structures that are affordable to middle class families. The ambiance of the neighborhood feel will be gone and with what Î a fence that will be at the edge of Co. Rd. B. If the City Council decides to approve this construction, \[which we are extremely against\], there will be a LOT of noise pollution and poor air quality. In fact even now, every night at 10:00 p.m. MenardÓs has a Ðstreet cleanerÑ cleaning the south side where the lumbar yard is. They do this to avoid the dust from going down the sewer. During the construction, this will be multiplied many fold to keep it under control. Again, air pollution! Why doesnÓt Menards think about a 2 story store instead. There is one on University Avenue and it is a nice building for a smaller sized property. Perhaps Menards should think this through and change their plans. They mentioned at least twice that this location will be tight even with the homes being removed. Again, why go through all of this and not find another better Ðfit.Ñ We really wanted to be more Ðon taskÑ and to give facts, which I believe we have done. But yes, there are emotions in this with many who live in the neighborhood. Our parents purchased the property on Duluth Street in the mid-50Ós, and built our home which was a part of farmland owned by one of the owners on Co. Rd. B. This was done BEFORE Maplewood was a city and called New Canada Township. This neighborhood is a quiet safe neighborhood. The neighbors know each other and look out for each other. We saw this comment on the Nextdoor website from someone who lives in this neighborhood: ÐThere are over 10,000 caliper inches of trees keeping light and noise contained and directed towards the highway. The plan to replace those trees is a joke, and needs to be improved.Ð Can these trees actually be removed???? We have concerns on what will be rezoned. Will this all be commercial or will it be a combined commercial/residential? And if commercial will this then open the door for more commercial ventures to come into our existing neighborhood and to lose additional homes. We need honesty here, please. If it is rezoned, is this a slippery slope to more developments invading our neighborhood? Thus more homes being torn down, more trees taken down, more families displaced, etc.? We wish our parents were still with us as they have a lot more knowledge of some issues they had with Menards. It has not always been a great relationship. We think our late father, Gordon Anderson, came to the Maplewood City Council on at least one occasion regarding Menards, though we could be wrong. It may have been regarding the height of the fence in the back of their building which abuts our back yard. One time Gordon and Judy spoke in front of the City Council when they noticed an error on the zoning of our property Î 2255 Duluth. It was zoned commercial. The City Council agreed with JudyÓs take on this that it appears ÐsomeoneÑ did made a ÐtypoÑ on only our property and they voted to change it back to where it should have been Î residential. Menards has also contacted our parents and us on selling our two lots so their trucks can have more room in the back of the store. They never really understood the word, NO, as we had to say this several times. They would have built a huge fence just a few feet from the back of our home and my parents could have stayed, for free, in the home. This would have really ruined the entire Duluth Street neighborhood. Menards makes the comments, Ðall of these items will ease the transition between commercial and residential.Ñ We find this reprehensible at the least. Are they living right in back of the building? No. Or on Co. Rd. B.? No. It certainly is amazing how Menards is able to make these and other statements they have made in this document with a straight face. We have read this document several times and going through various points, and it is almost humorous how the writers of this document is making this all sound so sweet, beautiful, and lovely Î and to us it is nauseous. We apologize if we have offended anyone, but from their words, it is clear that they are trying to paint a picture that, Ðeverything will be great, just let us do what we want to do with your neighborhood.Ñ Well, the two words, Ðyour neighborhood,Ñ is very meaningful Î this is OUR NEIGHBORHOOD and we want it to stay as beautiful as it is now. Thank you very much! COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARDSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date January 21, 2020 Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT TO: REPORT FROM:Jane Adade, Planner PRESENTER:Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director Comprehensive Sign Plan, St. John’s Hospital, 1575 Beam Avenue AGENDA ITEM: Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing Form of Action:ResolutionOrdinanceContract/AgreementProclamation Policy Issue: Spectrum Signs on behalf of St. John’s Hospital is requesting city approval to amend the comprehensive sign plan for the St. John’s Hospital campus at 1575 Beam Avenue East, as part of a system-wide program.This amendment will replace four (4) individual channel letter setwall signs with four (4) new channel letter sets mounted to aluminum cabinet and retainer. Recommended Action: Motion to approve an amendment to thecomprehensive sign plan for the St. John’s Hospital at 1575 Beam Avenuewith the following conditions: 1.The design of signs not shown on the plans shall be submitted to staff for approval. Monument Sign: Five monument signs not exceeding 200 square feetare allowed. 2.All signs shall follow the approved design and color scheme.Wall Sign: Four wall signs not exceeding 300 square feet and 20 feet in height are allowed. 3.Sign placements shall comply with those shown on the approved site plan. 4.Staff may approve minor changes to this sign plan. Major changes may only be approved by the community design review board. 5.All illuminated signs shall comply with the city’s outdoor lighting requirements. 6.One door sign is allowed. The door sign shall not cover more 20 percent of the door surface. 7.All directional information wall signs shall not exceed 120 square feet and 5 feet in height. 8.All directional freestanding signs with the exception of the emergency directional sign along Hazelwood Street shall not exceed 18 square feet and 6 feet in height. 9.The emergency directional sign along Hazelwood Street shall not exceed 60 square feet and 10 feet in height. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact?NoYes, the true or estimated cost is$0. Financing source(s):Adopted BudgetBudget ModificationNew Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other:N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Financial SustainabilityIntegrated CommunicationTargeted Redevelopment Operational EffectivenessCommunity InclusivenessInfrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on December 4, 2019. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is February 2, 2020. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. Background On May 20, 1982, the city council approved a ConditionalUse Permit for St. John’s Hospital at 1575 Beam Avenue. On May 12, 1997, the city council approved a 25-foot front yard setback for the parking ramp and a 10-foot parking lot setback variance from Hazelwood Street. At this same meeting, the site and building design plans and a CUP revision were approved. On July 28, 1998, the city’s design review board approved a comprehensive sign plan for the St. John’s Hospital. On January 9, 2006,staff approvedminor revisions to the comprehensive sign plan for St. John’s Hospital. Discussion Existing Comprehensive Sign Plan Thecity’s sign ordinance requires all large campuses consisting of buildings and land of ten or more acres to have an approved comprehensive sign plan. The city’s design review board originally approved a comprehensive sign plan for the St. John’s Hospital at 1575 Beam Avenue on July 28, 1998. On January 9, 2006, staff approved minor revisions to the sign plan which added two 28 square foot wall signs on the south elevation, one new 65 square foot freestanding sign not exceeding 14 feet in heightand to replace the existing freestanding sign along KennardStreet and a new 141 square foot freestanding sign not to exceed20 feet high. Proposed Comprehensive Sign Plan Amendment The applicant is seeking approval of a comprehensive sign plan amendment to replace four (4) individual channel letter set wall signs and withfour (4)new channel letter sets mounted to aluminum cabinet and retainer.The proposed sign layouts, fonts and color scheme reflect a new branding being rolled out at 10 hospitals and 60 primary care clinics. Thedetails of the signs to be replaced include: (i)Theexisting 439.9 square foot individual lettered wall signs on the east and west elevations will be replaced with two 294.5 square foot signs mounted to aluminum cabinet and retainer. (ii)The existing 36.5 square foot individual lettered wall sign on the main entrance will be replaced with a 54.5 square foot sign mounted to aluminum cabinet and retainer. (iii)The existing 44.8 square foot individual lettered wall sign on the west elevation will be replaced with a 59.3 square foot sign mounted to aluminum cabinet and retainer. All other wall cabinet signs will be refaced and retrofitted with LED lighting. The applicant also proposes to remove two (2) directional information signs, and reface and retrofit all existing freestanding signs. Reference Information Site Description Site Size:18.32acres Existing Land Use: St. John’s Hospital Surrounding Land Uses North: Parking Lot/Cottages of Legacy Village South: Office Buildings East:Apartment Homes (Granite Trails) West:Hazelwood Medical Building/Gas Station Planning Existing Land Use:Commercial (C) Existing Zoning:Business Commercial(BC) Attachments 1.Overview Map 2.Applicant’s Narrative 3.Applicant’sPlans 4.Photos of Installed New Signage at the Southdale Hospital in Edina 5.Community Design Review Board Minutes, July 28, 1998 Attachment 1 1575 Beam Avenue East November 26, 2019 City of Maplewood Information Overview Map Legend ! I 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Attachment 2 Attachment 3 Tu/!Qbvm-!NO!6651227:1!Vojwfstjuz!BwfBuuo;!Lsbf!MbvtdiN!Ifbmui!Gbjswjfx!Contact Nbqmfxppe-!NO!6621:2686!Cfbn!Bwf!Jobsite 723.783.8531 Phone 2303402:2103402::0602:Date Tu/!Kpio‘t!IptqjubmN!Ifbmui!Gbjswjfx NI!.!114 Ib{fmxppe!Tusffu 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf T u / ! C K f p b i n o ‘ ! t B ! C w m f w e / ofL esbo fsuT! uf N Attachment 3 Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 2:(.8! 2 8 NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Fbtu!Fmfwbujpo! 0 9 23(.4! # 8(.5! 4 4 0 9 0 9 # # 2(.5!2(.2!3(.2!4(.:! 4226 0000 5339 #### Ojhiu!Wjfx 3:5/6!Trvbsf!Gffu ST. JOHNÊS ST. JOHNÊS HOSPITAL HOSPITAL 26(.1# Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf E G F D CB Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ G/!Csjdl!Xbmm!Cbdlhspvoe!!E/!Qpxfs!Tvqqmjft!Npvoufe!po!Joufsjps!pg!Cvjmejoh!gps!TfswjdfD/!Xijuf!MFE!Jmmvnjobujpo!Xijuf!Nbsppo;!QNT;!$313D!Hpme;!QNT;!$248DC/!Ejhjubmmz!Qsjoufe!Usbotmvdfou!Gmfy!Gbdf!Nb ufsjbm!B/!22!609!Effq!)419804199*!Bmvnjovn!Dbcjofu!boe!Sfubjofs!Qbjoufe!QNT;!$248D!boe!XijufGvsojti!boe!Jotubmm!)2*!2:‘.8!809!y!26‘.1Ž!MFE!Gbdf!Jmmvnjobufe!Xbmm!Npvou!Tjho 54:/:!Trvbsf!Gffu!Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Fmfwbujpo!up!cf!Sfnpwfe Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Qspqptfe!Fbtu!Fmfwbujpo! Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 2:(.8! 3 8 NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Xftu!Fmfwbujpo! 0 9 23(.4! # 8(.5! 4 4 0 9 0 9 # # 2(.5!2(.2!3(.2!4(.:! 4226 0000 5339 #### Ojhiu!Wjfx 3:5/6!Trvbsf!Gffu ST. JOHNÊS ST. JOHNÊS HOSPITAL HOSPITAL 26(.1# Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf E G F D CB Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ G/!Csjdl!Xbmm!Cbdlhspvoe!!E/!Qpxfs!Tvqqmjft!Npvoufe!po!Joufsjps!pg!Cvjmejoh!gps!TfswjdfD/!Xijuf!MFE!Jmmvnjobujpo!Xijuf!Nbsppo;!QNT;!$313D!Hpme;!QNT;!$248DC/!Ejhjubmmz!Qsjoufe!Usbotmvdfou!Gmfy!Gbdf!Nb ufsjbm!B/!22!609!Effq!)419804199*!Bmvnjovn!Dbcjofu!boe!Sfubjofs!Qbjoufe!QNT;!$248D!boe!XijufGvsojti!boe!Jotubmm!)2*!2:‘.8!809!y!26‘.1Ž!MFE!Gbdf!Jmmvnjobufe!Xbmm!Npvou!Tjho 54:/:!Trvbsf!Gffu!Fyjtujo h!Xftu!Fmfwbujpo!up!cf!Sfnpwfe! Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Qspqptfe!Xftu!Fmfwbujpo! Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 4 5(.1# 47/6!Trvbsf!Gffu NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Nbjo!Fousbodf 2(.3! 5! 9# 2 0 2 5 0 # 5 # 63!Trvbsf!Gffu Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf HOSPITALST. JOHNÊS Qspqptfe!Nbjo!Fousbodf!Xbmm!Tjho 24(.1# Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ FE D G B C G/!Csjdl!Xbmm!Cbdlhspvoe!!E/!Qpxfs!Tvqqmjft!Npvoufe!po!Joufsjps!pg!Cvjmejoh!gps!TfswjdfD/!Xijuf!MFE!Jmmvnjobujpo!Xijuf!Nbsppo;!QNT;!$313D!Hpme;!QNT;!$248DC/!Ejhjubmmz!Qsjoufe!Usbotmvdfou!Gmfy!Gbdf!Nb ufsjbm!B/!:!203!Effq!)4197*!Bmvnjovn!Dbcjofu!boe!Sfubjofs!Qbjoufe!QNT;!$248D!boe!XijufGvsojti!boe!Jotubmm!)2*!5‘.1!y!24‘.1!MFE!Gbdf!Jmmvnjobufe!Xbmm!Npvou!Tjho Ojhiu!Wjfx Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm HOSPITALST. JOHNÊS Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 5 NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Dbodfs!Dfoufs 5(.1# 2(.3! 5! 9# 2 0 2 5 0 # 5 # 55/94!Trvbsf!Gffu Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Qspqptfe!Xftu!Fmfwbujpo!.!Dbodfs!Dfoufs22(.3! CENTERCANCER 2 0 3 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ E F G D C B G/!Csjdl!Xbmm!Cbdlhspvoe!!E/!Qpxfs!Tvqqmjft!Npvoufe!po!Joufsjps!pg!Cvjmejoh!gps!TfswjdfD/!Xijuf!MFE!Jmmvnjobujpo!Xijuf!Nbsppo;!QNT;!$313D!Hpme;!QNT;!$248DC/!Ejhjubmmz!Qsjoufe!Usbotmvdfou!Gmfy!Gbdf!Nb ufsjbm!B/!:!203!Effq!)4197*!Bmvnjovn!Dbcjofu!boe!Sfubjofs!Qbjoufe!QNT;!$248D!boe!XijufGvsojti!boe!Jotubmm!)2*!5‘.1!y!22‘.3!203!MFE!Gbdf!Jmmvnjobufe!Xbmm!Npvou!Tjho Ojhiu!Wjfx Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm CENTERCANCER Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Hsbef 6 2:(.5# NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Npovnfou!Tjho!7 25(.4! 6(.1! 4 6 0 0 9 9 # # Xftu!Gbdf 2(.2# ST. JOHNÊS Building1600 Medical HOSPITAL Cancer CenterLot A & BMain Entrance FNFSHFODZ 9(.2! 8(.209# 2 0 9 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fbtu!Gbdf FNFSHFODZ Cancer Center Main Entrance 1600 Medical ST. JOHNÊS HOSPITAL Lot A & B Building :# Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ C E B D F 2(.9# +!Sfusp”u!xjui!Ijhi!Joufotjuz!Xijuf!MFEt!!!F/!!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!QNT;!$313D!NbsppoE/!)3*!2:‘.3!y!5!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbzt!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbm!Hpme!Ejwj efst;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!!!Qbsljoh!Tzncpm;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Tvmubo!Cmvf!)4741.268*!Dpqz;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Cmbdl!Qfsg/!Wjozm!)4746.333*D/!)3*!25‘.4!609Ž!y!8‘.209!y!/236 Ž!Spvufe!Bmvnjovn!Gbdft!Qbjoufe!XijufC/!Fnfshfodz;!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdft!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Sfe!Wjozm!)4741.44*!Cmbdl‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Cmbdl!)331.23*!Hpme‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf !Usbotmvdfou!Qpqqz!Psbohf!)4741.255*!N‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Cvshvoez!)4741.5:*!!Gsbnft!Qbjoufe!QNT;!$248D!Hpme!boe!XijufB/!)3*!6‘.409!y!8‘.209!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdft!xjui!Gsbnft!up! Gju!Pwfs!Fyjtujoh!DbcjofuSfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!Fyjtujoh!Jmmvnjobufe!E0G!Npovnfou!Tjho! Fyjtujoh!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!7Qspqptfe!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!7 Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Hsbef 7 25(.1# NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Npovnfou!Tjho!8 21(.4! 4(.9! 2 2 0 0 3 3 # # Opsui!Gbdf ST. JOHNÊS Building1600 Medical Cancer CenterLot A & BMain Entrance FNFSHFODZ HOSPITAL 7(.2# 6(.3# Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf C Tpvui!Gbdf Cancer Center Main Entrance 1600 Medical ST. JOHNÊS HOSPITAL Lot A & B Building 4! 2 8! 0 3 2 # 0 3 # FB E D Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ 2(.3# +!Sfusp”u!xjui!Ijhi!Joufotjuz!Xijuf!MFEt!!!F/!!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!QNT;!$313D!NbsppoE/!)3*!24‘.21!y!4!203!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbzt!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbm!Hpme !Ejwjefst;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!!!Qbsljoh!Tzncpm;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Tvmubo!Cmvf!)4741.268*!Dpqz;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Cmbdl!Qfsg/!Wjozm!)4746.333*D/!)3*!21‘.4!203Ž!y!6‘.3!y!/ 236Ž!Spvufe!Bmvnjovn!Gbdft!Qbjoufe!XijufC/!Fnfshfodz;!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdft!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Sfe!Wjozm!)4741.44*!Cmbdl‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Cmbdl!)331.23*!Hpme‘;!Gjstu!Tvsg bdf!Usbotmvdfou!Qpqqz!Psbohf!)4741.255*!N‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Cvshvoez!)4741.5:*!!Gsbnft!Qbjoufe!QNT;!$248D!Hpme!boe!XijufB/!)3*!4‘.9!203!y!6‘.3!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdft!xjui!Gsbnft! up!Gju!Pwfs!Fyjtujoh!DbcjofuSfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!Fyjtujoh!Jmmvnjobufe!E0G!Npovnfou!Tjho! Fyjtujoh!Opsui!Tjef!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!8Qspqptfe!Opsui!Tjef!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!8 Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 8 Hsbef 21(.1# NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!Npovnfou!Tjho!9 8(.5#3(.9# Fbtu!Gbdf 5(.5! ST. JOHNÊS 1600 Building Lot BCardiac RehabCancer Center &Lot DVisitorsPatients &Lot AMain Entrance HOSPITAL 4(.9! 8 0 2 9 0 # 9 # 7! Opsui!Gbdf 2 0 9 # ST. JOHNÊS ExitVisitorsPatients &Lot AMain Entrance Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf HOSPITAL Tpvui!Gbdf 3! 6 0 9 # ST. JOHNÊS Exit1600 Building Lot B HOSPITAL B Xftu!Gbdf Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ ST. JOHNÊS 1600 Building Lot BCardiac RehabCancer Center &Lot DVisitorsPatients &Lot AMain Entrance HOSPITAL EC D Fyjtujoh!Xftu!Tjef!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!9Qspqptfe!Xftu!Tjef!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!9 +!Sfusp”u!xjui!Ijhi!Joufotjuz!Xijuf!MFEt!!!E!!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!QNT;!$313D!NbsppoD/!)5*!21‘.1!y!3!609!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!Hpme!E jwjefst;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!!!Qbsljoh!Tzncpm;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Tvmubo!Cmvf!)4741.268*!Dpqz;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Cmbdl!Qfsg/!Wjozm!)4746.333*C/!)5*!8‘.5Ž!y!4‘.9!209!y!/236 Ž!Spvufe!Bmvnjovn!Gbdft!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!Cmbdl‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Cmbdl!)331.23*!Hpme‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Qpqqz!Psbohf!)4741.255*!N‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Cvshvoez!)4741.5:*!!Gsbnft! Qbjoufe!QNT;!$248D!Hpme!boe!XijufB/!)5*!3‘.9!y!4‘.9!209!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdft!xjui!Gsbnft!up!Gju!Pwfs!Fyjtujoh!DbcjofuSfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!Fyjtujoh!Jmmvnjobufe!5.Tjefe!Npovnfou! Tjho! Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 Hsbef 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 9 24(.22! 8 NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Npovnfou!Tjho!: 0 9 21(.4! # 4(.9! 4 2 0 0 9 3 # # Tpvui!Gbdf ST. JOHNÊS Building1600 Medical HOSPITAL Lot A & BMain Entrance 7(.1! 6(.2! 6 0 9 4 # 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Opsui!Gbdf FNFSHFODZ Main Entrance 1600 Medical ST. JOHNÊS HOSPITAL Lot A & B Building 4! 2 8! 0 3 2 # 0 3 # GF ECB D Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ Xftu!TjefFbtu!Tjef 2(.3# 2(.3# +!Sfusp”u!xjui!Ijhi!Joufotjuz!Xijuf!MFEt!!!G/!)2*!2‘.3!y!25‘.1!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Dpwfs!Tjef!pg!Dbcjofu!Xifsf!Bddfout!bsf!SfnpwfeF/!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Q NT;!$313DE/!)3*!24‘.21!y!4!203Ž!!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbzt!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbm!!!Hpme!Ejwjefst;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Qbsljoh!Tzncpm;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Tvmu bo!Cmvf!)4741.268*!Dpqz;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Cmbdl!Qfsg/!Wjozm!)4746.333*D/!)3*!21‘.4!203Ž!y!6‘.2!405!y!/236Ž!Spvufe!Bmvnjovn!Gbdft!Qbjoufe!XijufC/!Fnfshfodz;!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdft!xjui!Gjstu!Tvs gbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Sfe!Wjozm!)4741.44*!!!Cmbdl‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Cmbdl!)331.23*!Hpme‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Qpqqz!Psbohf!)4741.255*!N‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Cvshvoez!)4741.5:*!!Gsbnft !Qbjoufe!QNT;!$248D!Hpme!boe!XijufB/!)3*!4‘.9!409!y!6‘.2!405!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdft!xjui!Gsbnft!up!Gju!Pwfs!Fyjtujoh!DbcjofuSfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!Fyjtujoh!Jmmvnjobufe!E0G!Npovnfou !Tjho! Fyjtujoh!Tpvui!Tjef!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!:Qspqptfe!Tpvui!Tjef!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!: Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 10 Hsbef 31(.1# NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Npovnfou!Tjho!21 25(.22! 6(.1! 4 0 2 5 0 # 5 # Xftu!GbdfFbtu!Gbdf 2(.2# ST. JOHNÊS Building1600 Medical Professional Bldg Maplewood Professional Bldg BeamMain Entrance HOSPITAL 9(.2! 8(.1! 6 0 9 6 # 0 9 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Professional BldgProfessional Bldg FNFSHFODZ Main Entrance 1600 Medical ST. JOHNÊS HOSPITAL Maplewood Building Beam 5# :# FECB D Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ Tpvui!TjefOpsui!Tjef 3(.7# G 3(.7# +!Sfusp”u!xjui!Ijhi!Joufotjuz!Xijuf!MFEt!!!G/!)2*!F/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!up!Nbudi!QNT;!$313DE/!)3*!2:‘.21Ž!y!5!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbm!H pme!Ejwjefst;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!!!Qbsljoh!Tzncpm;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Tvmubo!Cmvf!)4741.268*!Dpqz;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Cmbdl!Qfsg/!Wjozm!)4746.333*D/!25‘.22!205Ž!y!8‘.609!y !/236Ž!Spvufe!Bmvnjovn!Gbdft!Qbjoufe!XijufC/!Fnfshfodz;!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdft!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbot/!Sfe!Wjozm!)4741.44*!!!Cmbdl‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!Cmbdl!)331.23*!Hpme‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgb df!Usbotmvdfou!Qpqqz!Psbohf!)4741.255*!N‘;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Usbotmvdfou!Cvshvoez!)4741.5:*!!Gsbnft!Qbjoufe!QNT;!$248D!Hpme!boe!XijufB/!)3*!6‘.405!y!8‘.609!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdft!xjui!Gsbnft!u p!Gju!Pwfs!Fyjtujoh!DbcjofuSfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!Fyjtujoh!Jmmvnjobufe!E0G!Npovnfou!Tjho! Fyjtujoh!Xftu!Tjef!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!21Qspqptfe!Xftu!Tjef!pg!Npovnfou!Tjho!21 3‘.7!y!31‘.1!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Dpwfs!Tjef!pg!Dbcjofu!Xifsf!Bddfout!bsf!Sfnpwfe! Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 11 Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Fmfwbujpo!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho 4(.7# Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Qspqptfe!Fbtu!Fmfwbujpo!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho FNFSHFODZ Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ 29(.3# +!Sfusp”u!Fyjtujoh!Dbcjofu!xjui!MFEtE/!)2*!7!203!y!4‘.7!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Dpwfs!Tjef!pg!DbcjofuD/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Dbcjofu!Xijuf!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Usbotmv dfou!Qpqqz!Psbohf!)4741.255*!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Usbotmvdfou!Sfe!Wjozm!)4741.44*C/!FNFSHFODZ;!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdf!xjui!Ibohfs!CbsB/!Ofx!Bmvnjovn!G.Sfubjofs!xjui!3!203!Effq!Sfuvsot!Qbjouf e!Xijuf!Sfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!4‘.7!y!29‘.3Ž!T0G!Jmmvnjobufe!Xbmm!Dbcjofu Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm CB E D :# 7! 2 0 3 # Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 12 Fyjtujoh!Tpvui!Fmfwbujpo!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho 5(.:# Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf FNFSHFODZ Qspqptfe!Tpvui!Fmfwbujpo!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho 35(.1# Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ +!Sfusp”u!Fyjtujoh!Dbcjofu!xjui!MFEtE/!)2*!7!203!y!5‘.:!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Dpwfs!Tjef!pg!DbcjofuD/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Dbcjofu!Xijuf!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Usbotmv dfou!Qpqqz!Psbohf!)4741.255*!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Usbotmvdfou!Sfe!Wjozm!)4741.44*C/!FNFSHFODZ;!Gmbu!Xijuf!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdf!xjui!Ibohfs!CbsB/!Ofx!Bmvnjovn!G.Sfubjofs!xjui!3!203!Effq!Sfuvsot!Qbjouf e!XijufSfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!5‘.:!y!35‘.1Ž!T0G!Jmmvnjobufe!Xbmm!Dbcjofu Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm B E C D :# 7! 2 0 3 # Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 13 Fyjtujoh!Xftu!Fmfwbujpo!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Fyju!Pomz!Tjho 2(.22! 6 0 9 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Qspqptfe!Xftu!Fmfwbujpo!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho Exit Only 22(.1! 2 Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ 0 5 # +!Sfusp”u!Fyjtujoh!Dbcjofu!xjui!MFEtD/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Dbcjofu!Xijuf!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Usbotmvdfou!Sfe!Wjozm!)4741.44*C/!FYJU!POMZ;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Qfsgpsbufe!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)4746.333 *!Gmbu!Xijuf!BdszmjdB/!Ofx!Bmvnjovn!Gbdf!xjui!2!209!Effq!Sfuvsot!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!Cbdlfe!xjui!Sfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!2‘.22!609!y!22‘.205Ž!T0G!Jmmvnjobufe!Xbmm!Dbcjofu Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm CB D 9! 2 0 9 # Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 14 Fyjtujoh!Tpvui!Fmfwbujpo!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Fnfshfodz!Fousbodf!Xbmm 3(.1# Xftu!Tjef Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf 3(.1# FNFSHFODZ Tpvui!Tjef Qspqptfe!Tpvui!Fmfwbujpo!Fnfshfodz!Xbmm!Tjho 31(.:! FNFSHFODZ 8 0 9 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ 24(.7# +!Sfusp”u!Fyjtujoh!Dbcjofu!xjui!MFEt!QNT;!$28:8!SfeD/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Dbcjofu!boe!Sbejvt!Dpsofs!C/!FNFSHFODZ;!Xijuf!Bdszmjd!CbdljohB/!Ofx!/236!Spvufe!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbzt!Qbjo ufe!up!Nbudi!QNT;!$28:8!Sfe)2*!3‘.1!y!24‘.7Ž!T0G!Jmmvnjobufe!Xbmm!Npvou!DbcjofuSfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!3‘.1!y!31‘.:!809Ž!T0G!Jmmvnjobufe!Xbmm!Dbcjofu!boe Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm C DB 9! 2 0 3 # Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 15 NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Fnqmpzff!Fousbodf 2(.5! 2 0 3 # Employee Entrance Only 3(.1!405#!Hmbtt 2(.7# HOSPITALST. JOHNÊS Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf CB Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ C/!Fyjtujoh!Hmbtt!EppsB/!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Ejhjubmmz!Qsjoufe!MphpGvsojti!boe!Bqqmz!)2*!2‘.5!203!y!2‘.7!Tfu!pg!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Epps!Wjozm Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!BQspqptfe!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!B Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 16 Fyjtujoh!Dbodfs!Dbsf!Qmbrvf!up!cf!Sfnpwfe NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Dbodfs!Dfoufs!Qmbrvf 2(.6# Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Qspqptfe!Dbodfs!Dbsf!Qmbrvf CANCER CENTER 3(.1# Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ B D C !Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Nbsppo;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cvshvoez!Wjozm!)331.69*!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*C/!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Pqbrvf!4N!Wjozm!HsbqijdtB/!2!209!Effq!Bmv njovn!Qbo!Tjho!Qbjoufe!XijufGvsojti!boe!Jotubmm!)2*!2‘.6!y!3‘.1!Bmvnjovn!Qbo!Tjho 2! 2 0 9 # Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 17 NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Cbot!Hvot 3(.1# 22# tobacco-free campus. for not smoking. Welcome to our Thank you 3(.1#2(.6# Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf B C Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!BQspqptfe!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!B +!Gbtufofs!Ipmft!Mpdbufe!jo!Npsubs!Kpjout!po!Csjdl!Xbmmt!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Upnbup!Sfe!Wjozm!)331.24*!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*C/!/236!Xijuf!Bmvnjovn!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!G jstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtB/!409!Xijuf!Bdszmjd!Qmbrvf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Cmbdl!Wjozm)4*!3‘.1!y!3‘.1!Upcbddp!Gsff!QmbrvftGvsojti!boe!Jotubmm!)4*!22!y!2‘.6!Cbot!Hvot!Qmbrvft!boe Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Nbjo!Jefoujgjdbujpo!Tjhot Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Hazelwood Street 7 6 14 8 4 13 5 1216 1575 11 3 Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ 1 2 Beam Ave 10 9 Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm N Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 18 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!B 7(.1# 5! Fbtu!GbdfTjho!B 2 0 5 # FNFSHFODZ 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Xftu!GbdfTjho!B FNFSHFODZ 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ DCB Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!BQspqptfe!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!B D/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Upnbup!Sfe!Wjozm!)331.24*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sf qbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho )3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 19 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!C 7(.1# 5! Xftu!GbdfTjho!C 2 0 5 # FNFSHFODZ EntranceAmbulance 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fbtu!GbdfTjho!C FNFSHFODZ FNFSHFODZ Ambulance Entrance Entrance Patient 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ B C D 4# Tjho!up!cf!SfnpwfeFyjtujoh!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!C +!Sfnpwf!Fyjtujoh!Ebnbhfe!TjhoD/!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!Qbjoufe!QNT;!$313DC/!Bmvnjovn!Sfwfbm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Sfe;!Gjs tu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Upnbup!Sfe!Wjozm!)331.24*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtGvsojti!boe!Jotubmm!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!Opo.Jmmvnjobufe!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Qspqptfe!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!C Ebuf Attachment 3 20 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!D 7(.1# 5! Fbtu!GbdfTjho!D 2 0 5 # FNFSHFODZ DeliveriesEntranceAmbulance 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Xftu!GbdfTjho!D Deliveries 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ C D B Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!DQspqptfe!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!D +!Tusbjhiufo!Fyjtujoh!Tjho!.!Fyjtujoh!Tjho!Pvu!pg!MfwfmD/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wj ozm!)331.23*!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Upnbup!Sfe!Wjozm!)331.24*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho )3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 21 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!E 7(.1# 5! Xftu!GbdfTjho!E 2 0 5 # FNFSHFODZ EntranceAmbulanceEntrancePatient 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fbtu!GbdfTjho!E FNFSHFODZ FNFSHFODZ Ambulance Entrance Entrance Patient 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ B C D Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!EQspqptfe!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!E +!Tusbjhiufo!Fyjtujoh!Tjho!.!Fyjtujoh!Tjho!Pvu!pg!MfwfmD/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!H pme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Upnbup!Sfe!Wjozm!)331.24*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm !HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 22 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!F 5(.21! 2 0 3 # 3(.7# Opsui!GbdfTjho!F FNFSHFODZ 3(.6!3(.:! 88 00 99 ## Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Tpvui!GbdfTjho!F 3# FNFSHFODZ 3# Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ CB Fyjtujoh!Opsui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!FQspqptfe!Opsui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!F C/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!3!y!3!Bmvnjovn!Trvbsf!Uvcf!Qpmft!Tbujo!Cmbdl!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Upnbup!Sfe!Wjozm!)331.24*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Bmvnjo vn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!3‘.7!y!3‘.6!809Ž!!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 23 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!G 7(.1# 5! Opsui!GbdfTjho!G 2 0 5 # Parking OnlyEmergency Mpu!F 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Tpvui!GbdfTjho!G Parking Only Emergency Mpu!F 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ CB D Fyjtujoh!Opsui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!GQspqptfe!Opsui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!G D/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjs tu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Upnbup!Sfe!Wjozm!)331.24*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfd ujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 24 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!H :(.21# 2(.3! 4 0 9 # Opsui!GbdfTjho!H FNFSHFODZ 5(.8# 8(.4! 7(.9! 6 0 8 9 0 # 9 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf FNFSHFODZ Tpvui!GbdfTjho!H Entrance Main Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ 3! 7! 4 0 4 5 0 #5 # B FEC D Fyjtujoh!Tpvui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!HQspqptfe!Tpvui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!H +!Sfusp”u!Fyjtujoh!Tjho!Dbcjofu!xjui!Ijhi!Joufotjuz!Xijuf!MFEtF/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DE/!)3*!:‘.9Ž!y!3!405!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfw fbmtD/!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Sfe!Wjozm!)4741.44*C/!Fnfshfodz;!Gmbu!xjui!Qpmzdbscpobuf!Gbdf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Usbotmvdfou!B/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Dbcjofu!boe!Sfu bjofs!XijufSfgbdf-!Sfqbjou!boe!Sfusp”u!)2*!:‘.21!y!7‘.9!809Ž!E0G!Jmmvnjobufe!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 25 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!I 7(.1# 5! Opsui!GbdfTjho!I 2 0 5 # ParkingContract 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Tpvui!GbdfTjho!I Contract Parking 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ C D B D/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjs tu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Fyjtujoh!Opsui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!IQspqptfe!Opsui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!I Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 26 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Hsbef 7(.1# NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Tjhot!J!'!K 3(.1# Xftu!GbdfTjho!J Thank you for not smoking. tobacco-free campus. Welcome to our 3(.22! 4(.4! 8 8 0 0 9 9 # # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fbtu!GbdfTjho!K St. JohnÊs Hospital Thank you for choosing Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ C B Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!K C/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!3!y!3!Bmvnjovn!Trvbsf!Uvcf!Qpmft!Tbujo!Cmbdl!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Upnbup!Sfe!Wjozm!)331.24*!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmb z!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)3*!3‘.1!y!3‘.22!809!T0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjhot Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Qspqptfe!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!K Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 27 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!L 7(.1# 5! Xftu!GbdfTjho!L 2 0 5 # Building Parking1600 MedicalHospital &Mpu!C 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fbtu!GbdfTjho!L Hazelwood Mpu!C Exit to 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ CB D Fyjtujoh!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!LQspqptfe!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!L D/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjs tu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Hsffo;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Hsffo!Wjozm!.!Dpmps!UCWB/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E 0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 28 NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!M Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fyjtujoh!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!M!up!cf!Sfnpwfe Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 29 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!N 7(.1# 5! Fbtu!GbdfTjho!N 2 0 5 # Cvjmejoh2711!Nfejdbm Pain CenterHeart ClinicLung CenterPark Dental 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Xftu!GbdfTjho!N Lung Center 2711!Nfejdbm Heart Clinic Pain CenterPark Dental Cvjmejoh 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ CB D +!Fyjtujoh!Tjho!jt!Pvu!pg!Mfwfm!.!Tusbjhiufo!Bt!SfrvjsfeD/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt! Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y !3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Fyjtujoh!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!NQspqptfe!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!N Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 30 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!O 7(.1# 5! Tpvui!GbdfTjho!O 2 0 5 # Parking in Lot BAdditional only.visitors andPatients, theirReserved forParkingHospital Mpu!B 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Opsui!GbdfTjho!O Patients, their Parking in Lot B Reserved for visitors and Additional Mpu!B Hospital only. Parking 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ C D Fyjtujoh!Opsui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!OQspqptfe!Opsui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!O D/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjs tu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Cmvf;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmvf!Wjozm!.!Dpmps!UCW!B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0 G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 31 NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Tjho!P Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fyjtujoh!Qbsljoh!Tjho!P!up!cf!Sfnpwfe Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 32 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!Q 7(.1# 5! Tpvui!GbdfTjho!Q 2 0 5 # Parking in Lot BAdditional only.visitors andPatients, theirReserved forParkingHospital Mpu!B 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Opsui!GbdfTjho!Q Patients, their Parking in Lot B Reserved for visitors and Additional Mpu!B Hospital only. Parking 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ CB D Fyjtujoh!Tpvui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!QQspqptfe!Tpvui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!Q D/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjs tu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Cmvf;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmvf!Wjozm!.!Dpmps!UCW!B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0 G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 33 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!R 7(.1# 5! Tpvui!GbdfTjho!R 2 0 5 # Permit Required ParkingCardiac RehabCancer Center &Drop OffCancer Center Mpu!E 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Opsui!GbdfTjho!R Cancer Center & Cardiac Rehab Cancer Center Permit Required Drop Off Mpu!E Parking 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ CB D Fyjtujoh!Tpvui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!RQspqptfe!Tpvui!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!R +!Fyjtujoh!Tjho!jt!Pvu!pg!Mfwfm!.!Tusbjhiufo!Bt!SfrvjsfeD/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt! Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Psbohf;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Psbohf!Wjozm!.!Dpmps!UCWB/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tv sgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 34 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!S 7(.1# 5! Fbtu!GbdfTjho!S 2 0 5 # ParkingBuilding1600 Medical Mpu!D 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Xftu!GbdfTjho!S 1600 Medical Mpu!D Building Parking 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ CB D Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!SQspqptfe!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!S D/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Hpme;!Gjstu !Tvsgbdf!4N!Bqsjdpu!Wjozm!)331.75*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 35 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!T 7(.1# 5! Xftu!GbdfTjho!T 2 0 5 # ParkingBuilding Parking1600 MedicalHospital &Mpu!C 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fbtu!GbdfTjho!T Hazelwood Mpu!C Exit to 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ CB D Fyjtujoh!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!TQspqptfe!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!T D/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!Hpme;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Hpme!Wjozm!)331.75*!Cmbdl;!Gjstu! Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*!Hsffo;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Wjozm!.!Dpmps!UCWB/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfdu jpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 36 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn Hsbef 7(.1# NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Tjhot!U!'!V 3(.1# Xftu!GbdfTjho!U St. JohnÊs Hospital Thank you for choosing 3(.22!405# 4(.4!405# Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fbtu!GbdfTjho!V Thank you for not smoking. tobacco-free campus. Welcome to our Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ C B Fyjtujoh!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!VQspqptfe!Fbtu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!V C/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!3!y!3!Bmvnjovn!Trvbsf!Uvcf!Qpmft!Tbujo!Cmbdl!Sfe;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Upnbup!Sfe!Wjozm!)331.24*!Cmbdl;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Cmbdl!Wjozm!)331.23*B/!/236!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmb z!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)3*!3‘.1!y!3‘.22!405!T0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjhot Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn 37 Hsbef NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Tjho!W 7(.1# 5! Xftu!GbdfTjho!W 2 0 5 # Mpu!C 4(.1! 3(.9# 2 0 5 # Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Fbtu!GbdfTjho!W Mpu!C 2! 2 0 4# 5 # Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ B DC Fyjtujoh!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!WQspqptfe!Xftu!Gbdf!pg!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjho!W D/!Tboe-!Qsjnf!boe!Sfqbjou!Fyjtujoh!Bmvnjovn!Bddfou!QNT;!$313DC/!)3*!6‘.21Ž!y!2!205!y!/191!Bmvnjovn!Pwfsmbz!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!up!Gjmm.jo!Sfwfbmt!Hsffo;!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!4N!Wjozm!.!Dpmps!UCWB/!/236!Bmvnjo vn!Pwfsmbz!Qbofm!Qbjoufe!Xijuf!xjui!Gjstu!Tvsgbdf!Wjozm!HsbqijdtSfgbdf!boe!Sfqbjou!)2*!7‘.1!y!3‘.9Ž!E0G!EJsfdujpobm!Tjho Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm Ebuf Attachment 3 874.543.8558!!}!!xxx/tqfdusvn.tjhot/dpn NI!.!114!.!Tu/!Kpio‘t!Iptqjubm!.!Ejsfdujpobm!Tjhot (22) Freestanding Directional Signs Cmbjof-!NO!6655:9897!X/!46X!Tfswjdf!Esjwf Hazelwood Street H G J I F E O N P D K Q L M BC 1575 Jod/-!xjmm!cf!sfjncvstfe!%2-111/11!qfs!pddvsfodf/Jod/-!jt!tusjdmz!qspijcjufe/!Jg!tvdi!bo!fwfou!pddvst!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufntpg!dpotusvdujoh!uif!tjho!cz!bozpof!puifs!uibo!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-Tqfdusvn !Tjho!Tztufnt-!Jod/!Ejtusjcvujpo!pg!uijt!esbxjoh!gps!uif!qvsqptfJu!jt!opu!up!cf!qspevdfe!ps!evqmjdbufe!xjuipvu!uif!xsjuufo!dpotfou!pgUijt!esbxjoh!jt!uif!fydmvtjwf!qspqfsuz!pg!Tqfdusvn!Tjho!Tztufnt-!J od/ RS U T Beam Ave V A Dvtupnfs!Bqqspwbm N Ebuf Attachment 4 Comprehensive Sign Plan Amendment – St. John’s Hospital – 1575 Beam Ave. East Examples of existing signage of similar design – Southdale Hospital, Edina, MN Attachment 4 Attachment 4 Attachment 5 COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARDSTAFF REPORT Meeting Date January 21, 2020 REPORT TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager REPORT FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director PRESENTER: Michael Martin, AICP, Assistant Community Development Director AGENDA ITEM: John Glenn Middle School, 1560 County Road B East a.Design Review Resolution Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation Policy Issue: ISD 622 is requesting approval to move forward with several building additions and a complete renovation of all existing spaces at John Glenn Middle School, located at 1560 County Road B East. The new construction would include new classroom spaces, special education rooms, new music rooms, secure entry provisions, and a new, larger pool with new locker rooms. The renovated portions of the building include a new, larger cafeteria and food service area, more functional administrative spaces, and enhancements to the courtyard to improve access and functionality. To move forward with this project, the applicant needs city council approval of a conditional use permit and design review. Recommended Action: a. Motion to approve a resolution for the design review plans. Fiscal Impact: Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0. Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source Use of Reserves Other: N/A Strategic Plan Relevance: Financial Sustainability Integrated Communication Targeted Redevelopment Operational Effectiveness Community Inclusiveness Infrastructure & Asset Mgmt. The city deemed the applicant’s application complete on January 9, 2020. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision is March 9, 2020. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary to complete the review. Background: Conditional Use Permit Amendment Section 44-1092 of the city code permits schools to be located within any zoning district with an approved conditional use permit. The site currently has an approved conditional use permit that will need to be amended as part of this project. The use of the property will not be changing. The addition and remodel will allow for more students to attend this school but there are no concerns from staff about the ability of the site to absorb these increases. Design Review Site Plan The proposed site layout for John Glenn Middle School seeks to utilize the exiting layout of the site, but according to the applicant work to improve safety and circulation. The main alteration is an effort to separate the student drop-off and bus loading to improve pedestrian safety and traffic flow. Paths and walkways will be maintained or added for circulation throughout the site as well as connections to the surrounding neighborhood. The building entries will be designed in a manner to passively direct circulation and create small discrete areas for gathering while acting as aesthetic extensions of the building architecture. The site improvements include the expansion of the bus loading area and parking for anticipated growth as well as repurposing of the area surrounding the existing building and proposed building additions. The staff, visitor, and accessible parking stalls are located north of the building with additional parking available in the bus loading lot. The bus loading area will be located on the west side of the site with a driveway entrance from Hazelwood Street. The south driveway to this lot will be relocated further south to accommodate the expanded bussing needs. The student drop-off loop is accessed through a driveway entrance off County Road B East. Building Elevations John Glenn Middle School was originally built in 1961. Since the original construction two significant projects have been completed. These included a pool addition in 1965 and an addition to the academic wing in 1987. The overall building is a split-level configuration, with the academic wing occupying levels one and three, and the administration offices, cafeteria, gymnasiums and pool on level two. There is a courtyard that is currently accessible from a single door on level two. The proposed project includes several additions and a complete renovation of all existing spaces. The new construction includes new classroom spaces, special education rooms, new music rooms, secure entry provisions, and a new, larger pool with new locker rooms. The renovated portions of the building include a new, larger cafeteria and food service area, more functional administrative spaces, and enhancements to the courtyard to improve access and functionality. In addition to enhancing the flexibility and functionality of indoor and outdoor teaching spaces, the proposed project emphasizes improving the exterior appearance of the building. John Glenn Middle School’s existing structure is mix of cast-in-place concrete, masonry, and steel framing with a built-up roofing system. The new exterior materials include insulated precast concrete panels down to cast-in-place concrete footings, cast-in-place concrete foundation walls with integral insulation, curtain wall glazing, canopies made of steel framing clad with a fiber cement and phenolic panel system, and a fully adhered EPDM roof system. Landscaping The applicant is proposing several shrub and perennial planting beds near main entrances and at key locations around the building. Overstory and ornamental trees are being added to provide shade, color interest, and frame gathering areas. The planting plan includes overstory trees, ornamental trees, and several existing trees. The applicant is removing 17 trees which is less than 20 percent of the site’s overall tree count. The applicant is required to replace these trees on a one- to-one basis. The applicant is proposing to plant 64 new trees, meeting the city’s tree replacement requirements. Parking The proposed site plan provides for 156 parking spaces. Of the 156, 60 will be dedicated for staff parking and be located near the busses. Parent parking will be located north of the building with 96 spaces. In addition, busses will have 35 dedicated parking stalls. City code states schools must have a minimum of one space for every 20 auditorium seats – the parking being provided well exceeds this requirement. Lighting The applicant shall be required to submit a revised photometric plan meeting the City’s 0.4 footcandle requirements at all property lines. The applicant’s submitted photometric plan exceeds this requirement at the site’s tree entrances. Department Comments Engineering Please see Jon Jarosch’s engineering report, dated January 13, 2020, attached to this report. Environmental Please see Shann Finwall’s environmental report, dated January 13, 2020, attached to this report. Building From Dave Peterson – Building Official: Build per 2012 IBC, 2012 IMC, 2012 IFGC, 2014 NEC, 2012 Minnesota State Plumbing Code, 2015 Minnesota State Fire Code, MN 2015 Accessibility code, MN1306, and 2015 Minnesota Building Code. Demonstrate compliance with all the requirements of the 2012 Minnesota Energy Code Chapter 1323 Section C401.2. Mixing 2012 IECC provisions and ASHRAE Standard 90.1 to obtain compliance is not an option. The following forms must be completed as submittals. a. ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Building Envelope Compliance Documentation b. ASHRAE 90.1-2010 HVAC Compliance Documentation c. ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Service Water Heating Compliance Documentation d. ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Lighting Compliance Documentation e. Or COMCHECK Special inspections required as per 2012 IBC Chapter 17. Complete supporting special inspection schedule document and submit with plans. Plumbing plans shall be submitted to the State Plumbing Department for approval prior to the issuance of a plumbing permit. St Paul water requires permits for water piping. Maplewood requires permit for drain waste and vent. Permits are required for building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, fire alarm, and sprinklers. Provide two sets of stamped and signed plans and one digital set. Board and Commission Review January 21, 2020: The community design review board will review this project. January 21, 2020: The planning commission will hold a public hearing and review this project. Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 130 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site for their opinion about this proposal. Staff received 5 responses – all shown below. 1. Letter attached to this report. (Patrick Horan, 2034 Hazelwood Street North) 2. I agree for the purpose of security. I don’t know the demographics of the area for potential new students (Jean and Donald Beguhl, 1581 Sandhurst Avenue East) 3. Our only concern with the design is limiting parental pickup entry and exit to only the entrance off County B. It is already very dangerous to try to get into our driveway in the afternoon and this could make it worse. In general we think renovating John Glenn is greatly overdue and a necessity. We just want to get into our driveway safely. (Adam Klenke and Amy Bilbee, 1593 County Road B East) 4. As we live on E. Co Rd B, we have concerns as to how the street is to be open for ingress and egress. Xcel is replacing gas lines next spring and you are planning on major construction on John Glenn. We would appreciate all efforts to keep County Road B open as much as possible. Thank you. (Keith Miller, 1654 County Road B East) 5. Thank you for your work in this project. I also have many renovations in my old house I would love to do also. It would cost me more than the house is worth it I tried to do them all. I don’t see any price tags on the improvements and with all the work listed it looks extremely expensive. I went to an old school for high school and they made some improvements that were necessary. I am retired, my income doesn’t go up, and I just got a raise in my real estate taxes of $400.00, partly from other big school bonds. Please remember you will be an old person someday also, and spend money like it was your own. (Steve Hanson, 2011 Prosperity Road North Reference Information Site Description Site Size: Menard Inc. site – 15.67 Acres Existing Land Use: Middle School Surrounding Land Uses North: County Road B East and single family homes South: Gateway Trail and single family homes East: Single dwellings West: Hazelwood Street, apartments and single dwellings Planning Existing Land Use: Institutional Existing Zoning: Single-Dwelling Residential (R1) Previous Actions October 13, 1977: The city council approved building plans for a 59 by 23-foot storage-room addition. September 12, 1983: The city council rezoned the property to R1. September 14, 1987: The city council approved a conditional use permit allowing a building addition. Attachments: 1. Conditional Use Permit Amendment Resolution 2. Resolution Approving Design Plans 3. Overview Map 4. 2040 Future Land Use Map 5. Zoning Map 6. Applicant’s Narrative 7. Site Plan 8. Landscape Plan 9. Building Elevations 10. Tree Preservation Plan, date-stamped January 13, 2020 11. Jon Jarosch’s Engineering Report, dated January 13, 2020 12. Shann Finwall’s Environmental Report, dated January 13, 2020 13. Patrick Horan Letter 14. Applicant’s Plans (separate attachment) Attachment 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, SETBACK VARIANCES AND SHORELAND OVERLAY VARIANCE RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Independent School District No. 622 is requesting the City of Maplewood approve an amendment to its conditional use permit to allow a building addition and site plan changes. 1.02 The property located at 1560 County Road B East is legally described as: VAC STS ACCRUING AND FOL WITH 66 FT ESMT TO PROSPERITY RD THE W 139 9/1O FT OF LOT 3 AND ALL OF LOTS 1 AND 2 BLK 7 SABIN GARDEN LOTS AND ALL OF SD MEMBREZ ADD Section 2. Standards. 2.01 City Ordinance Section 44-1092(3) requires a Conditional Use Permit for any institution of any educational, philanthropic or charitable nature; cemetery, crematory or mausoleum. 2.02 General Conditional Use Permit Standards. City Ordinance Section 44-1097(a) states that the City Council must base approval of a Conditional Use Permit on the following nine standards for approval. 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. Attachment 1 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Section 3. Findings. 3.01 The proposal meets the specific conditional use permit standards. Section 4. City Review Process 4.01 The City conducted the following review when considering this conditional use permit amendment request. 1. On January 21, 2020, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council _________ this resolution. 2. On February 10, 2020, the city council discussed this resolution. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. Section 5. City Council 5.01 The city council hereby _______ the resolution. Approval is based on the findings outlined in section 3 of this resolution. Approval is subject to the following conditions: (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated July 16, 1987, unless a change is approved by the city’s community design review board. 2. No occupancy permit shall be issued until construction contracts have been signed for the development. 1.The city council shall review this permit in one year. 2. All construction shall follow the design plans approved by the city and date- stamped December 24, 2019. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 3. The proposed construction must be started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 4. Comply with all city ordinance requirements for signage. __________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on February 10, 2020. Attachment 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING DESIGN PLANS FOR JOHN GLENN MIDDLE SCHOOL LOCATED AT 1560 COUNTY ROAD B EAST Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01 Independent School District No. 622 is requesting the City of Maplewood approve design plans for John Glenn Middle School. 1.02 The property located at 1560 County Road B East is legally described as: VAC STS ACCRUING AND FOL WITH 66 FT ESMT TO PROSPERITY RD THE W 139 9/1O FT OF LOT 3 AND ALL OF LOTS 1 AND 2 BLK 7 SABIN GARDEN LOTS AND ALL OF SD MEMBREZ ADD 1.03 On January 21, 2020, the community design review board reviewed this request. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information to the community design review board. The community design review board considered all of the comments received and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into this resolution. Section 2. Site and Building Plan Standards and Findings. 2.01 City ordinance Section 2-290(b) requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. Section 3. City Council Action. 1.01.1 The above-described design plans are hereby approved based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this resolution. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the design plans date- stamped December 24, 2019. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: Attachment 2 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. All requirements of the fire marshal and building official must be met. 3. Meet all requirements in the engineering report, dated January 13, 2020. 4. Meet all requirements in the environmental report, dated January 13, 2020. 5. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District. 6. All rooftop equipment shall be screened. 7. Signage for this site is not approved. All signs require permits. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for staff approval the following items: a. A photometric plan that meets all city requirements which include limiting light intensity to 0.4 footcandles at all property lines and limits light pole height to 25 feet in height. b. Elevations for a trash and recycling enclosure. c. The applicant shall provide the city with a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. 9. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: a. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. c. Install all required landscaping and an in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. d. Install all required outdoor lighting. e. Restore all former curb cuts on Hazelwood Street North to a continuous concrete curb per City of Maplewood requirements. 10. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor Attachment 2 shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 11. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. __________ by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on February 10, 2020. Attachment 3 1560 County Road B East - John Glenn Middle School December 20, 2019 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Parcel 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Attachment 4 1560 County Road B East - John Glenn Middle School December 20, 2019 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Future Land Use - 2040 Low Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use - Neighborhood Public/Institutional Park 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Attachment 5 1560 County Road B East - John Glenn Middle School December 20, 2019 City of Maplewood Legend ! I Zoning Open Space/Park Single Dwelling (r1) Double Dwelling (r2) Multiple Dwelling (r3) Farm (f) Mixed Use (mu) 0490 Feet Source: City of Maplewood, Ramsey County Attachment 6 ISD 622 John Glenn Middle School Addition and Renovation Project Narrative December 20, 2019 Project Narrative Architecture John Glenn Middle School was originally built in 1961. Capital improvements have made to the school since the original construction, including a pool addition in 1965 and an addition to the academic wing in 1987. The overall building is a split-level configuration, with the academic wing occupying levels 1 and 3, and the administration offices, cafeteria, gymnasiums and pool on level 2. There is a courtyard that is currently accessible from a single door on level 2. The proposed project includes several additions and a complete renovation of all existing spaces. The new construction includes new classroom spaces (including science and STEM classrooms), special education rooms, new music rooms, secure entry provisions, and a new, larger pool with new locker rooms. The renovated portions of the building include a new, larger cafeteria and food service area, more functional administrative spaces, and enhancements to the courtyard to improve access and functionality. In addition to enhancing the flexibility and functionality of indoor and outdoor teaching spaces, the proposed project emphasizes improving the exterior appearance of the building. John Glenn Middle School’s existing structure is mix of cast-in-place concrete, masonry, and steel framing with a built-up roofing system. The building’s interior construction is masonry and light gauge steel framed walls with gypsum board finish. The building has an aluminum window system. The new exterior envelope/structure includes insulated precast concrete panels down to cast-in-place concrete footings, cast-in-place concrete foundation walls with integral insulation, curtain wall glazing, canopies made of steel framing clad with a fiber cement and phenolic panel system, and a fully adhered EPDM roof system. Civil and Landscape Introduction The site layout and design approach for John Glenn Middle School seeks to utilize the exiting layout of the site, but improve safety, circulation, strengthening the building entries and common areas to promote a welcoming sense of place. The focus for the circulation of the site is to separate the student drop-off and bus loading to improve pedestrian safety and traffic flow. Paths and walkways will be maintained or added for circulation throughout the site as well as connections to the surrounding neighborhood. The building entries will be designed in a manner to passively direct circulation and create small discrete areas for gathering while acting as aesthetic extensions of the building architecture. The site improvements include the expansion of the bus loading area and parking for anticipated growth as well as repurposing of the area surrounding the existing building and proposed building additions. The staff, visitor, and accessible parking stalls are located north of the building with additional parking available in the bus loading lot. The bus loading area will be located on the west side of the site with a driveway entrance from Hazelwood Street. The south driveway to this lot will be relocated further south to accommodate that expanded bussing needs. The student drop-off loop is accessed through a driveway entrance off County Road B. Earthwork and Site Soils A geotechnical exploration was conducted, and the report and recommendations will be used to determine the required subgrade preparation for building additions, pavement, and turf areas. Additional boring information will also be obtained and used for the structural design as well as stormwater infiltration requirements. The intent is to use existing topsoil for all planting soil in tree, shrub and perennial areas. If the existing topsoil does not meet requirements for planting, imported planting soil will be used meeting standard best practices. City of Maplewood CDRB Application LHB, Inc. Attachment 6 ISD 622 John Glenn Middle School Addition and Renovation Project Narrative December 20, 2019 Stormwater Management The design will meet the stormwater management requirements of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD), and NPDES/SDS General Stormwater Permit. The stormwater management approach for the site consists of two underground stormwater treatment systems to capture runoff from the building roof and parking lot impervious surfaces to maximize their effectiveness in improving stormwater quality. The perforated pipe gallery will allow for infiltration of the stormwater runoff into the subsurface soils, with a piped overflow connection to the nearby storm sewer system. Landscape Design and Vegetation The landscape is designed to provide a comfortable, inviting, and beautiful setting for the renovated building, in compliance with the requirements of the local Zoning Code. There are several shrub and perennial planting beds at near main entries and at key locations around the building. Overstory and ornamental trees were added selectively to provide shade, color interest, and frame gathering areas. The planting plan includes overstory trees, ornamental trees, and several existing trees. Where possible, existing trees will be preserved to maximize canopy coverage. All tree selections will be native or hardy adapted species, suitable for the site conditions. Shrub and perennial planting beds will be planted with native or hardy adapted species and will focus on selections that provide year-round interest, pollinator habitat, and non-toxic, kid-friendly attributes. All planting areas and trees will receive 3” of hardwood mulch and edging for planting areas will be a 4” metal edger where needed. An eighteen-inch maintenance edger of dresser trap rock will be included at the base of the building for ease of maintenance. All perennial and shrub planting areas will be irrigated unless the area is functioning as a stormwater management area. Entry Plazas The main public entry at the north end of the building and along the bus drop-off area on the west will be planted to enhance the building design and provide a welcoming experience. These spaces are designed to provide small gathering spaces with seating. The main building entry will be accentuated by having a charcoal gray colored concrete plaza that aligns with the building overhang and extends to the curb line. The bus entry will be emphasized by have a matching colored concrete under the building overhang. All concrete within the entry areas will be scored in a decorative manner that complements the building and landscape design. The main entry plaza features a small stepped turf amphitheater/seating area that is a total of eighteen inches in height. All key entry points will also feature at-grade planters that will be planted with ornamental grasses. Benches are set along the edges of the planters to provide small gathering areas. Courtyard Design The courtyard will be improved to work with the approximate five-foot grade change in a series of terraces and a sloped walk to provide access across the courtyard that complies with ADA standards. The sloped walk terminates with a cast-in-place concrete eighteen-inch-high seat wall/monumental stair that can double as an outdoor classroom. The courtyard will be designed to include seating towards the cafeteria side of the building, flexible outdoor classroom space towards the classrooms and labs, and shaded lawn and sensory gardens in between to provide a soft divide between uses. The walkable courtyard surfacing will be a decorative scored concrete that meets ADA standards and provides a durable surface that is easily maintained. The planted areas will be a combination of turf lawn, trees, and perennials. Bollard lighting will enhance the courtyard for evening and winter use. Site furnishings Pre-cast concrete benches provide durable seating at the main entry plaza, the pool entry, the bus drop off and in the courtyard. Bike racks are located near the main entry and cafeteria entry. Trash/recycling receptacles are provided near all main entry points to the building. City of Maplewood CDRB Application LHB, Inc. Attachment 6 ISD 622 John Glenn Middle School Addition and Renovation Project Narrative December 20, 2019 Electrical, Communication, Life Safety & Security Introduction The following description of Electrical and Technology design elements reflects the design team's approach to the conceptual design vision, and material and equipment standards set forth by the project team. The overall project scope of work for electrical and technology is intended to replace all existing systems and distribution to provide complete, new infrastructure for all systems to accommodate flexibility and growth for the foreseeable future. Exterior Scope The electrical and technology exterior scope of work will include perimeter, pedestrian, and parking lot lighting; trenching & concrete pads for primary utility distribution; secondary utility distribution (underground); emergency generator; and telecommunication & special systems distribution. Interior Scope of Work The electrical and technology exterior scope of work will include raceway systems and conductors; power distribution (e.g., lighting, HVAC, receptacles, special equipment); Lighting and Lighting Control Systems; Emergency Power (life safety and equipment), including a Smoke Control System for a designated Atrium; Telecommunication Cabling Infrastructure; Integrated Communications (Public Address/Intercommunications); Classroom Scheduling System; Clock System; Audio Visual Systems; Digital Signage; Security Management System and Devices (Access Control, Intrusion Detection, and Video Surveillance); and Digital, Addressable Fire Alarm. Electrical and Telecommunication Site/Utility A new electrical service and modified telecommunication service will be provided as part of the site upgrades to the facility. Site area lighting shall utilize LED modules to complement site security cameras, and energy efficiency, with building-mounted exterior lighting consisting of wall packs that are full cutoff (utilizing LED modules). All exterior lighting shall be controlled by the Network Lighting Control System. Electrical System The new electrical service shall consist of a service entrance switchboard and associated distribution equipment to provide power throughout the facility. The service and distribution system shall be designed with sub-metering of electrical infrastructure to provide better operational awareness (i.e., where energy is being utilized in the building). A complete grounding electrode system will be provided, which will include connection to building steel, underground metal water piping systems, and building Ufer ground. All electrodes shall comply with NEC article 250. A continuous equipment grounding conductor will be installed in all power/lighting conduit systems and all distribution equipment will have ground buses. The electrical distribution system will accommodate a new 150 kW natural gas generator that will serve Life Safety Power (Exit signs and egress lighting throughout the building; fire alarm system; Smoke Control System) and Optional Standby Power (food service coolers and freezers, select receptacles, network equipment, IT Room cooling equipment, and other Owner directed equipment). The facility lighting design approach will be to utilize LED drivers and all components shall be energy efficient and in compliance with local energy codes. Minimum lighting levels in all areas will conform to IES-NA standards (industry standard, supplemented by any Owner or project specific modifications). The design team will look at the option of utilizing Power Over Ethernet (lighting fixture power and controls over a single data cable) approach with Owner to evaluate if a more cost-effective solution may be achieved for the project. City of Maplewood CDRB Application LHB, Inc. Attachment 6 ISD 622 John Glenn Middle School Addition and Renovation Project Narrative December 20, 2019 Interior Lighting Systems will include the following general concepts: Office Areas (Administrative) and Classrooms: Private office and classroom room lighting shall 2’x2’ LED lay-in fixtures, occupancy sensor control. Cafeteria Lighting: Linear LED suspended mounted up/down lights, occupancy sensor control. Gymnasium Lighting: 21” diameter LED suspended high bay fixtures, occupancy sensor control. Corridors: 2’x2’ LED flat panels, time-sweep control Toilet Rooms: Provide 1’x 4’ lay-in, LED fixtures at/near walls, and LED downlights for ambient lighting. Ceiling mounted occupancy sensors shall be provided for lighting control. Exit Signs: Brushed Aluminum housing, universal mounting. Illuminated LED exit signs with red directional arrows will be provided at all exit doors and along the egress path. Storage, Mechanical, Electrical, and Janitor Rooms: 1x4 lensed LED strip fixtures, chain mount. Electrical and mechanical areas shall at least one fixture circuited to the emergency system. The facility will receive a new network lighting control system that will provide local dimming/scene set controls will tie into an overall facility time schedule (directed by the building automation system). General components of the system include Building wide time-sweep control; Indoor photoelectric sensors; Indoor occupancy/vacancy sensors; Low Voltage Switches; System control interface with Audio Visual System Controller(s); and accommodations to interface with Building Automation System. Communications and Life Safety & Security The building will receive a new Main Distribution Frame (MDF) where new Telecommunication Utility demarcation shall be established via a dedicated wall field, and a new Equipment Room layout will occur. This MDF shall than distribute via backbone cabling to the Intermediate Distribution Frame (IDF) Rooms. The MDF shall receive a dedicated cooling system that will be connected to the generator for always-on design, along with a dedicated electrical panelboard connected to the generator. The building will receive IDF Rooms as required to maintain a horizontal cable maximum length of 100 meters (required for certification) and sized to accommodate cabling distribution equipment. The IDF shall receive a dedicated cooling system that will be connected to the generator for always-on design. Communication Backbone Cabling shall consist of fiber optic and unshielded twisted pair (UTP) cabling to meet BICSI TDMM and ISD 622 requirements. Public Address, Intercommunication, and Clock systems shall utilize the existing District Standard Telecor XL system. The facilities’ current Telecor XL head end is recently installed and shall be modified for reuse in the renovated facility. A new Security Management System (SMS) and associated equipment devices for a fully functioning security system aligning with ISD 622 security standards will be provided. Specific components of the SMS include Access Control System; Intrusion Detection, SMS software; and Surveillance Camera System Interface. A new Fire Alarm System shall be provided, meeting all requirements for an Education and Business Occupancy design setup. The new facility will contain an Atrium condition, with the appropriate smoke control system being required to evacuate the atrium of all smoke for a period of time. Wellness and Sustainability The electrical, communication, and life safety and security systems designs shall incorporate sustainable design features, utilize an integrated approach to reduce overall energy use, and provide the Owner with an environmentally friendly facility. Items that will be included in the design: Light Pollution Reduction – The design of the interior/exterior lighting will include requirements for full cutoff fixtures on the exterior, and coordination with the architectural features to reduce interior light leak to the exterior. City of Maplewood CDRB Application LHB, Inc. Attachment 6 ISD 622 John Glenn Middle School Addition and Renovation Project Narrative December 20, 2019 Energy Efficiency – The electrical design will meet or exceed all the latest ASHRAE 90.1 requirements for energy efficiencies. Lighting design will include rebates from Marshall Municipal Utility. Quality of Lighting – The interior lighting design will incorporate controls, and IESNA lighting levels to promote a healthy working and learning environment. Conclusion The proposed project for John Glenn Middle School includes several additions and a complete renovation of all existing spaces. The new construction includes new classroom spaces (including science and STEM classrooms), special education rooms, new music rooms, secure entry provisions, and a new, larger pool with new locker rooms. The renovated portions of the building include a new, larger cafeteria and food service area, more functional administrative spaces, and enhancements to the courtyard to improve access and functionality. In addition to enhancing the flexibility and functionality of indoor and outdoor teaching spaces, the proposed project emphasizes improving the exterior appearance of the building. The site improvements are driven by the School District's increased educational needs to expand and realign program in the building as well as the need for improved site circulation. By separating the bus loading and unloading, staff and visitor parking, and student drop-off areas the proposed plan will increase student and visitor safety while improving necessary sight lines across the campus. Landscaping and lighting for the site will enhance site safety while complementing the education experience and building aesthetic. The proposed building additions and renovations for John Glenn Middle School will allow School District 622 to best meet the needs of their rapidly expanding student population while improving the overall safety and the student/teaching experience. City of Maplewood CDRB Application LHB, Inc. Attachment 7 80' 20'40' PLANS. PLAN NOTES 2.SEE C200 FOR SITE PLAN INDEX.4.SEE C202 FOR SURFACING AND LAYOUT PLAN ENLARGEMENTS 1.SEE C101 FOR DEMO PLAN.3.SEE C201 FOR SURFACING AND LAYOUT PLAN.5.SEE C301 FOR GRADING PLAN.6.SEE C401 FOR UTILITY PLAN.7.SEE C501 FOR CIVIL DETAILS.8.SEE L101 FOR TREE AND GROUNDCOVER PLAN.9.SEE L102, L103, L104 FOR SHRUBS AND PERENNIAL ENLARGEMENT10.SEE L501 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.11.SEE L502 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS GENERAL NOTES: EXISTING FIELDS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP. EXISTING FIELDS 2 C202 JOHN GLENN MIDDLE SCHOOL SEE 4/C202 COUNTY RD B EAST 1 C202 3 C202 HAZELWOOD ST SITE PLAN Scale: 1" = 40' 1 Attachment 8 #10 CONT CONT2-1/2" B&B2-1/2" B&B1.75" B&B6` CLUMPCONTCONTSeed MixMulchSodSeed Mix Acer rubrum `Red Rocket` / Red MapleCercis canadensis / Eastern RedbudChionanthus virginicus / White Fringetree BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEMaackia amurensis / Amur MaackiaMalus x `Professor Springer` / Professor Springer Crab Apple2" B&BPopulus tremuloides / Quaking AspenBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAME QTYQTYQTY AR314 CODECC4CV6MA23MP8PT20CODEQB23Quercus ellipsoidalis `Bailskies` / Majestic Skies Oak#20 CONTUX6Ulmus x `Patriot` ` / Patriot Elm2-1/2" B&BCODENS1,700 sfNo Mow Mix Seed / Refer to 32 9219MU13,433 sfShredded Hardwood Mulch / Refer to 32 9300SOD3,163 sfSOD / Refer to 32 9223TS135,054 sfTURF SEED / Refer to 32 9219 PLANS. PLAN NOTES 2.SEE C200 FOR SITE PLAN INDEX.3.SEE C201 FOR SURFACING AND LAYOUT PLAN.4.SEE C202 FOR SURFACING AND LAYOUT PLAN ENLARGEMENT5.SEE C301 FOR GRADING PLAN.6.SEE C401 FOR UTILITY PLAN.7.SEE C501 FOR CIVIL DETAILS.8.SEE L100 FOR SITE INDEX PLAN AND LANDSCAPE NOTES9.SEE L102, L103, L104 FOR SHRUBS AND PERENNIAL ENLARGEMENT 1.SEE C101 FOR DEMO PLAN.10.SEE L501 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.11.SEE L502 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS GENERAL NOTES: TREESCANOPY TREESGROUND COVERS PLANT SCHEDULE 60' 15'30' 87'-9" 2 MP3 MP 3 CV 3 CV 1 CC 1 CC 1 CC 18'-11" EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ. EQ 1 UX 3 PT TREESSEE 5/C501 PROTECT EXISTING EQ, TYP. . Q E . Q E 38'-8" 30'-6" PROTECT EXISTINGTREESEE 5/C501JOHN GLENN MIDDLE SCHOOL EQ. TYP. SEE 4/C202 FOR TREE DIMENSIONS 1 UX 1 UX EQ. TYP. COUNTY RD B EAST 6 PT 6 AR3 5 PT . Q E . Q E . Q E . Q E . Q E . Q E19'-8" . Q E STEEL EDGING,TYP. 6 PT 21'-5" 9'-6" EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.5'-10" 8 AR3 3 UX 3 QB23 MA2 1 CC 12'-1" 4'-7" 25'-8" 23'-10" EQ. 13'-6" EQ. 25'-9" EQ. 22'-10" 16'-10" EQ.EQ. EQ. 67'-1".EQ. EQ 3 MP 5'-7" EQ. 7'-9" TREES SEE 5/C501 SEED TO THE EXTENT OF UTILITY CORRIDOR PROTECT EXISTING TREE & GROUNDCOVER PLAN Scale: 1" = 30' HAZELWOOD ST 1 Attachment 9 TQFDJGJDBUJPOTTQFDJGJDBUJPOT 2FYJTUJOH!TUSVDUVSF!UP!SFNBJO3FYJTUJOH!HMB\[JOH!UP!SFNBJO4DBTU.JO.QMBDF!DPODSFUF5GJCFS!DFNFOU!XBMM!QBOFMT-!!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOE6QIFOPMJD!XBMM!QBOFMT-!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOE 230270312:!4;42;33!QN CJN!471;002:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo02:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo!B2:/swu Attachment 9 230270312:!4;42;43!QN CJN!471;002:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo02:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo!B2:/swu Attachment 9 230270312:!4;42;49!QN CJN!471;002:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo02:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo!B2:/swu Attachment 9 TQFDJGJDBUJPOTTQFDJGJDBUJPOTTQFDJGJDBUJPOT 2GJCFS!DFNFOU!XBMM!QBOFMT-!!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOE3QIFOPMJD!XBMM!QBOFMT-!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOE4DBTU.JO.QMBDF!DPODSFUF5FYJTUJOH!EPXOTQPVU!UP!SFNBJO/6OFX!BMVNJOVN!GSBNF!HMB\[FE!BTTFNCMZ! JO!OFX!PQFOJOH-!TFF DPVSUZBSE!TPVUI!FMFWBUJPO!BSFB!F 230270312:!4;42;54!QN CJN!471;002:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo02:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo!B2:/swu Attachment 9 QBOFMTQFDJGJDBUJPOTTQFDJGJDBUJPOTXBMM!QBOFM!GJOJTI!TVSGBDF/!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOETQFDJGJDBUJPOT 2DBTU.JO!QMBDF!DPODSFUF!PWFS!JOTVMBUFE!QSFDBTU!XBMM3QIFOPMJD!XBMM!QBOFMT-!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOE4GJCFS!DFNFOU!XBMM!QBOFMT-!!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOE5DBTU.JO.QMBDF!DPODSFUF6GVSSJOH!PWFS!JO TVMBUFE!QSFDBTU!XBMM-!XJUI!GJCFS!DFNFOU 230270312:!4;42;59!QN CJN!471;002:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo02:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo!B2:/swu Attachment 9 XBMM!QBOFM!GJOJTI!TVSGBDF/!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOETQFDJGJDBUJPOTQBOFM!GJOJTI!TVSGBDF/!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOETQFDJGJDBUJPOTTQFDJGJDBUJPOTTQFDJGJDBUJPOT 2GVSSJOH!PWFS!JOTVMBUFE!QSFDBTU!XBMM-!XJUI!GJCFS!DFNFOU3GVSSJOH!PWFS!JOTVMBUFE!QSFDBTU!XBMM-!XJUI!QIFOPMJD!XBMM4GJCFS!DFNFOU!XBMM!QBOFMT-!!TFF!QMBOT-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOE5QIFOPMJD!XBMM!QBOFMT-!TFF!QMBO T-!XBMM!TFDUJPOT-!BOE6DBTU.JO.QMBDF!DPODSFUF 230270312:!4;42;65!QN CJN!471;002:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo02:1322!Kpio!Hmfoo!B2:/swu Attachment 10 RemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemovedRemoved tƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķt ƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩ ĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻ ƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭ ĻƩǝĻķtƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķ Preserved Removed / NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Specimen (Y/N) YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY (Y/N) Significant 11111111NN11111NN1NN1NN1NN1NN11NN111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111NN1NN1NN1NN1NN1NN1NN1NN1NN1NN1NN111111NN1NN1NN11NN1NN1NN1NN1NN 2 Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Poor Poor Poor Poor Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good ConditionStems Very Poor Very Poor Aspen Linden GoodLindenLinden PoorLindenLindenLindenLinden Good Ginkgo Oak, redOak, redOak, redOak, red Boxelder FairBoxelder CrabappleCrabappleCrabappleCrabappleCrabappleAsh, whiteAsh, whiteAsh, white Tree Type Ash, greenAsh, greenAsh, greenAsh, greenAsh, greenAsh, greenMaple, redAsh, greenAsh, greenMaple, redMaple, redMaple, redMaple, redMaple, red Pine, ScotsPine, Scots Cottonwood Good Birch, paper Spruce, blueSpruce, blueSpruce, blueSpruce, blueSpruce, blueSpruce, blueMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverMaple, silverSpruce, blueMaple, silverMaple, silverSpruce, blueSpruce, blueMaple, silverMaple, silverSpruce, blue Elm, SiberianElm, Siberian Walnut, blackWalnut, blackWalnut, blackWalnut, blackWalnut, blackWalnut, blackWalnut, blackWalnut, blackWalnut, black Pine, Austrian Elm, AmericanElm, AmericanElm, AmericanElm, AmericanElm, AmericanElm, AmericanElm, AmericanElm, AmericanElm, AmericanElm, American Maple, Norway Oak, swamp whiteOak, swamp whiteOak, swamp whiteOak, swamp whiteOak, swamp whiteOak, swamp whiteOak, swamp whiteOak, swamp whiteOak, swamp whiteOak, swamp whiteOak, swamp white TOTAL caliper inches of significant trees on propertyTOTAL caliper inches of significant trees REMOVEDTOTAL number of trees REMOVED on siteTOTAL number of trees PLANTED on site equal or greater than 2" caliperTOTAL number of trees PLANTED on site less than 2" caliperTOTAL number of #5 woody shrubs PLANTED on site PERCENTAGE of total caliper inches of significant trees REMOVED 2222222 777 21242411212222212122212327 1217171714121717 ЊАЋАЌА ЊБЉЏЍЌ 13.5 ЊЍі DBH ЊЋЍА ARBORISTS INVENTORY TO CORRESPOND TO LABELED SURVEY 1000115.5100022610003100048.51000510006100071310008100091010010161001110012100133100143.5100152.510016100172.51001817.5100191002020.51002114.51002210023251002410025231002615.5100277.51002861002961003 012.5100311003291003310034231003510036100371003813100396100408.51004161004214.51004310100441004510.51004640Cottonwood Good100477.5100486.5100498100508.51005110.510052261005326100541510055100561610057 10058151005916100601006116.510062191006315100641006519.51006612.51006710068201006910.51007024.51007110072131007310.5100741007511.5100761007720100788.5100791008012.510081191008218.510083100842.5100852 .510086100872.510088100892.510090100912.5100923.5100931009418.510095100968100976.5100986.5100995.5101001.5101012.51010210101032.5101042.510105101065101073.5 Tree # 80' XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X XXXX X X X X X X X X X X XXXX X X X 20'40' X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X PROPERTY LINE X X X X X X X X X X XXX XX XX XXX XXX XXXX XXX XXXX XX XXX XXX XXXXXXX X X X X X XXX XX X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Bymmartinat11:36am,Jan13,2020 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X LEGEND X OF EXISTING TREES THROUGHOUT THE PARCEL, IN PARTICULAR ALONG COUNTYONLY REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SAFER CIRCULATION ROUTES, SCHOOL BUILDINGNIKKI SCHLEPPLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT701 WASHINGTON AVE. NORTH, SUITE 200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401612-766-2879TREE SURVEY PROVIDED BY TREE BIZCOMPLETED BY STEPHEN NICHOLSON, CERTIFIED FORESTER EFFORT WAS TAKEN TO ESTABLISH A LAYOUT THAT MAXIMIZED THE PRESERVATIONROAD B AND HAZELWOOD ROAD AND ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES. TREES WEREEXPANSION, AND IMPROVED GRADING FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. X X X X X X X X X X XX XXXX XXX XXXX X XXX XXX XXX XX X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X XX X X X XX X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X XX XX X X X XX X XX XX X XX XX X X X X X X X X XX XX X X X XX X XX X X X XX XX XXX XXX XXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X TREE PROTECTION PLAN Scale: 1" = 40' XX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX 1 Attachment 11 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: John Glenn Middle School Renovations PROJECT NO: 20-01 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, Assistant City Engineer DATE: 1-13-2020 PLAN SET: Engineering plans dated 12-20-2019 The applicant is proposing several additions to the existing John Glenn Middle School, along with reconfiguring the site to better accommodate drop-off and pick-up activities. The applicant is requesting design approval. As this project is projected to disturb more than ½ acre, it is required to meet the City’s stormwater quality and rate control requirements. Stormwater management for the site is proposed to be accommodated via the use of two underground infiltration systems. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents for final review, along with ratified agreements, prior to issuing building and grading permits. The following are engineering review comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits: Drainage and Stormwater Management 1) The project shall be submitted to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) for review. All conditions of RWMWD shall be met. 2) The applicant shall submit a stormwater management plan and calculations prior to permit approvals. This plan shall detail how the proposed site will meet the City of Maplewood and RWMWD’s stormwater requirements. 3) Soil boring information shall be submitted to support infiltration rates utilized in stormwater calculations. 4) A joint stormwater maintenance agreement with the City and RWMWD shall be signed by the owner for the proposed infiltration/filtration basins, underground infiltration system, and associated storm sewer system. Attachment 11 5) The 100-Year High-Water-Level (HWL) shall be depicted on the plans for the underground infiltration systems and low-point at the west side of the northerly parking lot. 6) The site shall meet the City’s freeboard requirements as it pertains to the underground infiltration systems, low-points, and the building floor elevation. 7) An emergency overflow location shall be provided for the low-point at the west end of the northerly parking lot. Grading and Erosion Control 8) The underground infiltration systems shall be protected from sedimentation throughout construction. 9) Inlet protection devices shall be installed on all existing and proposed onsite storm sewer until all exposed soils are stabilized. 10) Adjacent roadways shall be swept as needed to keep the pavement clear of sediment and construction debris. 11) All pedestrian facilities shall be ADA compliant. 12) A copy of the project SWPPP and NDPES Permit shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 13) The total cut/fill volume shall be noted on the grading plans. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 14) Sanitary sewer service piping shall be schedule 40 PVC or SDR 35. 15) Any proposed water service modifications are subject to the review and conditions of Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS). The applicant shall submit plans and specifications to SPRWS for review and meet all requirements they may have prior to the issuance of a grading permit by the City. 16) The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this phase of the project. Appropriate fees shall be charged during the permitting process. Attachment 11 Other 17) All damaged or removed portions of sidewalks and trails adjacent to the site shall be replaced in like-kind. Sidewalk shall be extended through the area where the existing southerly entrance is removed along Hazelwood Street. 18) The plans shall be signed by a professional engineer currently licensed in the State of Minnesota. 19) The southerly entrance to the parking lot/bus loading area is currently shown within a parking bay along Hazelwood Street. The curb along Hazelwood Street shall be modified to keep this southerly entrance outside of the parking bay (the curb alignment to the north shall be extended south past the entrance and then taper back into a parking bay). 20) The proposed sanitary sewer connection in County Road B is subject to the review of Ramsey County. All work within County Right-of-way will require a permit from the County. All conditions of Ramsey County shall be met prior to the issuance of permits. Public Works Permits The following permits are required by the Public Works Department for this project. The applicant should verify the need for other City permits with the Building Department. 21) Grading and erosion control permit 22) Sanitary Sewer Permit 23) Storm Sewer Permit 24) City Right-of-Way Permit Landscape Review Comments Provided by Emily Dunlap, City of Maplewood Natural Resources Coordinator The following species listed in the Landscape Plan need to be substituted: Japanese Silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis ‘Kleine Fontaine’) is to be removed from the plant schedule. Miscanthus has the potential to escape to nearby natural areas and become invasive, especially if it hybridizes with a nearby plant of a different cultivar. It is recommended that Miscanthus be replaced with a different grass such as Feather Reed Grass or Switchgrass. Attachment 11 - END COMMENTS - Attachment 12 Environmental Review Project: John Glenn Middle School Location: 1560 County Road B East Date of Plans: Tree Preservation Plan – 12/20/19 Landscape Plan – 12/20/19 Date of Review: January 13, 2020 Reviewer: Shann Finwall, AICP, Environmental Planner Project Background School District 626 is proposing additions and interior and exterior improvements to John Glenn Middle School. There are significant trees located on the property. The applicant must comply with the City’s tree preservation ordinance. Trees 1. Tree Preservation Ordinance: Maplewood’s tree preservation ordinance describes a significant tree as a hardwood tree with a minimum of 6 inches in diameter, an evergreen tree with a minimum of 8 inches in diameter, and a softwood tree with a minimum of 12 inches in diameter. A specimen tree is defined as a healthy tree of any species which is 28 inches in diameter or greater. The ordinance requires any significant tree removed to be replaced based on a tree mitigation calculation. The calculation takes into account the size of a tree and bases replacement on that size. The calculation also allows credits to the final tree replacement when preserving specimen trees (defined as a healthy tree that is 28 inches in diameter or greater). If less than 20 percent of the total significant tree diameter inches on the property is removed, the applicant shall replace one tree per significant tree removed. Tree replacement shall be a minimum of 2-caliper inches in size. 2.Tree Impacts: There are 80 significant trees, equaling 1,247 diameter inches of significant trees located on the property. The applicant is proposing to remove 15 significant trees, for a total of 180 diameter inches of significant trees removed from the site. This is less than 20 percent of the total significant tree diameter inches on the property. City code requires that the applicant replace one 2-caliper inch tree for every significant tree removed. In this case the applicant is required to replace 15 – 2-caliper inch trees. 3. Tree Replacement: The applicant’s landscape plan shows the planting of 64 trees, which exceeds City code requirement. 4. Tree Preservation Recommendations: Submit a cash escrow or letter of credit to cover 150% of the tree replacement requirements. Attachment 13