HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-10-25 City Council Workshop Packet
PLEASENOTESTARTTIME
PLEASENOTESTARTTIME
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
MANAGER WORKSHOP
5:30P.M. Thursday,October25, 2018
City Hall, Council Chambers
A.CALL TO ORDER
B.ROLL CALL
C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
D.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
E.NEW BUSINESS
1.Tobacco21Advocates
2.Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit OrientedDevelopment Update
F.ADJOURNMENT
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OUR COMMUNITY
Following are rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings -
elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be
heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council
meetings, it is understood thateveryone will follow these principles:
Speak only for yourself, not for other council members or citizens -unless specifically tasked by your
colleagues to speak for the group or for citizens in the form of a petition.
Show respect during comments and/ordiscussions, listen actively and do not interrupt or talk amongst each
other.
Be respectful of the process, keeping order and decorum. Do not be critical of council members, staff or others
in public.
Be respectful of each other’s time keeping remarks brief, to the point and non-repetitive.
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
E1
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOPSTAFF REPORT
Meeting Date October 25, 2018
REPORT TO:
Melinda Coleman, City Manager
REPORT FROM: Andrea Sindt, City Clerk
PRESENTER:
Katie Engman, Association for Nonsmokers – MN
Chris Turner, Association for Nonsmokers -MN
AGENDA ITEM:
Tobacco 21Advocates
Action Requested: Motion Discussion Public Hearing
Form of Action: Resolution Ordinance Contract/Agreement Proclamation
Policy Issue:
The City Council requested staff research raising the legal purchase age for tobacco from 18 to 21.
Currently, the state legal age is 18 but several cities have adopted ordinances increasing the age to
21 for their municipalities. This campaign has become known as Tobacco 21 or T21. The city
council will hear from Tobacco 21 advocates during the workshop.
Recommended Action:
Provide direction to staff on amending the city’s tobacco code.
Fiscal Impact:
Is There a Fiscal Impact? No Yes, the true or estimated cost is $0.00
Financing source(s): Adopted Budget Budget Modification New Revenue Source
Use of Reserves Other: n/a
Strategic Plan Relevance:
Financial Sustainability Integrated Communication Targeted Redevelopment
Operational Effectiveness Community Inclusiveness Infrastructure & Asset Mgmt.
Council will hear advocates present views of the Tobacco 21 movement.
Background
The Association of Nonsmokers – MN (ANSR) is an advocate group for reducing the use of
tobacco. In addition to working with youth regarding the effects of smoking, they bring their
message to cities. As of June 2018, eleven Minnesota cities have raised the legal purchase age of
tobacco to 21. These include Edina, St Louis Park, Bloomington, Plymouth, North Mankato, Falcon
Heights, Shoreview, Minneapolis, St Peter, Richfield and Roseville. Along with the age increase, the
cities also removed the purchase, use or possession (PUP) section of their code as the products
can be legally purchased in other cities.
Workshop Packet Page Number 1 of 106
E1
This first discussion is representative of the advocates of the Tobacco 21 movement. Appropriately,
the city council also should hear from those who may oppose the age increase. The council can
choose to hold another workshop for those with a different view or council could choose to have a
public hearing to hear testimony followed by a vote on an ordinance amendment.
Regardless, per state statute, all city licensed tobacco vendors must be notified 30 days before the
city council votes on any change to the tobacco ordinance. If council would like to move forward
with considering to raise the legal purchase age of tobacco to 21, staff will notify Maplewood’s 37
licensed tobacco vendors of the meeting date. Given the approaching holiday season, staff
proposes this occur in 2019.
Attachments
1. ANSR Powerpoint
Workshop Packet Page Number 2 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 3 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 4 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 5 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Teens and Tobacco in Minnesota, 2017 Update.
Workshop Packet Page Number 6 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Teens and Tobacco in Minnesota, 2017 Update.
Workshop Packet Page Number 7 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 8 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 9 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 10 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 11 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 12 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 13 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 14 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 15 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 16 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 17 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 18 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 19 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 20 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 21 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 22 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 23 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 24 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 25 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 26 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 27 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 28 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 29 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 30 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 31 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 32 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 33 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 34 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 35 of 106
E1, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 36 of 106
E2
CITY COUNCILSTAFF REPORT
Meeting Date October 25, 2018
REPORT TO:
Melinda Coleman, City Manager
REPORT FROM:Shann Finwall, AICP, Environmental Planner
PRESENTER:
Shann Finwall, AICP, Environmental Planner
AGENDA ITEM:Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Oriented Development Update
Action Requested:MotionDiscussionPublic Hearing
Form of Action:ResolutionOrdinanceContract/AgreementProclamation
Policy Issue:
The purpose of the Gold Line is to provide transit service to meet the existing and long-term needs
for residents, employees, and business owners within the project area.
Recommended Action:
No action required. Representatives from Crandall Arambula will be present during the October 25,
2018, City Council workshop to give an update on the Bus Rapid Transit Oriented Development
plans.
Fiscal Impact:
Is There a Fiscal Impact?NoYes, the true or estimated cost is$0
Financing source(s):Adopted BudgetBudget ModificationNew Revenue Source
Use of Reserves Other:n/a
Strategic Plan Relevance:
Financial SustainabilityIntegrated CommunicationTargeted Redevelopment
Operational EffectivenessCommunity InclusivenessInfrastructure & Asset Mgmt.
Transit-oriented development creates plans for transit-supportive land uses and improved
pedestrian, bike, and auto access within a half mile of each of the Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit
stations.
Background
The Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project is a planned, 9-mile dedicated transitway in Ramsey
and Washington Counties. In 2017, the Gold Line project entered the project development phase.
This includes design and engineering for the guideway and BRT stations and Bus Rapid Transit
Oriented Development (BRTOD) plans. These plans will define transit-supportive land uses and
improved pedestrian, bike, and auto access within a half mile of each of the ten Gold Line BRT
Workshop Packet Page Number 37 of 106
E2
stations. Crandall Arambula have been hired as prime consultants for the project management and
stakeholder coordination of this phase of the project which will include:
Phase 1, August-December 2017:Issues/Concerns Identification
Phase 2, January-March 2018:Preliminary Station Area Concepts
Phase 3, April-July 2018:Identify Preferred Station Area Land Use and Circulation Concepts
Phase 4, August-November 2018:Review Draft BRTOD Plan Adoption
Maplewood Bus Rapid Transit Oriented Development Plans
The Maplewood Station is envisioned as an employment station and a major corridor destination
that serves the 3M Campus, provides local and regional access to recreation at Battle Creek Park,
and transit access for residents of Maplewood. Market analysis for the Maplewood BRTOD reflect
the following:
Future development potential within a ¼ mile of the station will almost exclusively be determined
by 3M’s plans for growth.
I-94 is a barrier to the south and low density stable neighborhoods do not provideopportunity
sites for high density transit oriented development.
Transit-oriented development addressed in Comprehensive Plan update through Mixed Use
Community Designation and Future Master Plan.
Next steps in the process is to prepare additional plan elements including Maplewood bridge
partnership plan, cost estimate for Maplewood bridge crossing and station access improvements,
and Capital Improvement recommendations for station access projects. The plans will be reviewed
with Maplewood residents, with a finalBRTOD plan for staff and City Council review and adoption.
Attachments
1.Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Oriented Development Update Power Point Presentation
2.Gold Line BRT Station Area Planning – Multi-Use Trail Facilities Designation Process
Overview
Workshop Packet Page Number 38 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 39 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
2
Workshop Packet Page Number 40 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
3
Workshop Packet Page Number 41 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
4
I-494
I-94
Workshop Packet Page Number 42 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
5
Workshop Packet Page Number 43 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
6
Workshop Packet Page Number 44 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
7
Workshop Packet Page Number 45 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
8
Workshop Packet Page Number 46 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
9
Workshop Packet Page Number 47 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
10
Workshop Packet Page Number 48 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
11
Workshop Packet Page Number 49 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
12
Workshop Packet Page Number 50 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
13
Workshop Packet Page Number 51 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
14
Workshop Packet Page Number 52 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
15
Workshop Packet Page Number 53 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
16
Workshop Packet Page Number 54 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
17
Workshop Packet Page Number 55 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
18
Workshop Packet Page Number 56 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
19
Workshop Packet Page Number 57 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
20
Workshop Packet Page Number 58 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
21
Workshop Packet Page Number 59 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
22
Workshop Packet Page Number 60 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
23
Workshop Packet Page Number 61 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
24
Workshop Packet Page Number 62 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
25
Workshop Packet Page Number 63 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
26
Workshop Packet Page Number 64 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
27
Workshop Packet Page Number 65 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
28
Workshop Packet Page Number 66 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
29
Workshop Packet Page Number 67 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
30
Workshop Packet Page Number 68 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
31
Workshop Packet Page Number 69 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
32
Workshop Packet Page Number 70 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
33
Workshop Packet Page Number 71 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
34
Workshop Packet Page Number 72 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
35
Workshop Packet Page Number 73 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
36
Workshop Packet Page Number 74 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
37
Workshop Packet Page Number 75 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
38
Workshop Packet Page Number 76 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
39
Workshop Packet Page Number 77 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
40
Workshop Packet Page Number 78 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
41
Workshop Packet Page Number 79 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
42
Workshop Packet Page Number 80 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
43
Workshop Packet Page Number 81 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
44
Workshop Packet Page Number 82 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
45
Workshop Packet Page Number 83 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
46
Workshop Packet Page Number 84 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
47
Workshop Packet Page Number 85 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
48
Workshop Packet Page Number 86 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
49
Workshop Packet Page Number 87 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
50
Workshop Packet Page Number 88 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
51
Workshop Packet Page Number 89 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
52
Workshop Packet Page Number 90 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
53
Workshop Packet Page Number 91 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
54
Workshop Packet Page Number 92 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
55
Workshop Packet Page Number 93 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
56
Workshop Packet Page Number 94 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
57
Workshop Packet Page Number 95 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
58
Workshop Packet Page Number 96 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
59
Workshop Packet Page Number 97 of 106
E2, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 98 of 106
E2, Attachment 2
701 Xenia Avenue South | Suite 300|Minneapolis, MN 55416 | (763) 541-4800
Memorandum
To:Jason Graf, Principal
Crandall Arambula PC
From:Andy Hingeveld, AICP, Senior Transportation Planner
Date:DRAFT -October 12, 2018
Re:Gold Line BRT Station Area Planning Multi-Use Trail Facilities Designation
Process Overview
WSB Project No. R-010003-000
Crandall Arambula PC has requested WSB evaluate potential trail/bikeway designations and
corresponding funding opportunities for two potential multi-use trail facilities (referred to as trails
throughout the remainder of the document) identified as part of the Gold Line BRT station area
planning process. This memorandumsummarizestrail designation requirements at the state,
region, and countylevelsfor plannedbicycle and pedestrian facilities based on information
provided in relevant trail and bicycle system plans.A recommended approach is provided to
pursueappropriate trail/bikeway designation(s) for each of the proposed facilities andsupport
the ability for obtainingfunding and advancingdevelopment alongside the Gold Line BRT
project development timeframe.
1.Multi-Use TrailFacilities Under Consideration
As part of the station area planning, bicycle and pedestrian facility improvementshave been
identified to enhanceaccess to the planned BRT stations. Two potential facilities are being
evaluated in this memorandum. The first is a new multi-use trail bridge (also being referred to
-94 near the 3M/Maplewood Station. The second isa nine-mile
multi-use trail facility that has been proposed adjacent to the BRT transitway (referred to as
Due to the connectivity that these two trail facilities may
provide across multiple jurisdictionsand improved access to major destinations, it has been
discussed that they may provide a regional benefit.
2.Summary of RelevantSystem Plans and Multi-Use Trail Facility Designations
The following section summarizes the different trail designations and corresponding system
plans that were reviewed and evaluated for this memorandum. The subject trail designations
include: theState Trail system (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources),the Regional
Trail system as defined in the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan (Metropolitan Council),
Regional Bikeway Transportation Network (RBTN) under the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan
(Metropolitan Council), and county transportation and bicycleplans for Ramsey and
Washington Counties. The corresponding system plans were reviewed to identify how these
Building a legacy yourlegacy.
Equal Opportunity Employer | wsbeng.com
K:\\010003-000\\Admin\\Docs\\Regional Trail Designation Memo\\Regional Trail Designation Memo.docx
Workshop Packet Page Number 99 of 106
E2, Attachment 2
Gold Line BRT Station Area Planning Multi-Use Trail Facilities Designation Process Overview
October 12,2018
Page 2
systems are defined, criteria for trails to be addedinto the system plan, and potential funding
sources associated with the trail designation.
A.State Trail:Minnesota State Parks and TrailSystem Plan
Summary/purpose:
The Minnesota State Parks and Trails System Plan (the System Plan) provides a guide
for the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to manage state-owned parks and trail
corridors.The System Planrecognizes24 state trailcorridors, generally located along
rivers, lakes, and other scenic areasthatattract users from across the region and the
state.State trails generally support of multiple uses, including walking, biking,
equestrian, ATVs, and snowmobiles.
The purpose for state trails is set out in state statute:
A state trail shall be established to provide a
recreational travel route which connects units of
the outdoor recreation systemor the national trail
system, provides access to or passage through
other areas which have significant scenic, historic,
scientific, or recreational qualities or reestablishes
or permits travel along a historically prominent
travel route or which providescommuter
transportation.
(Minnesota Statutes, section 86a.05 subd. 4a).
Eligibility criteria:
In the System Plan, theDNR identifieseight criteria to evaluatewhether a trail has the
qualities and function of a state trailper the statutory definition. While the System Plan
uses the criteria to only evaluate previously defined state trail corridors, it can serve as a
proxy for evaluating other corridors for state trail status. The eight criteria are:
Natural, cultural, and scenic landscapes: Users canaccess areas with identified
high natural resource qualities, such as state parks, scientific and natural areas,
wildlife management areas, or historic or cultural sites of statewide significance.
Broad-based visitation: Trail attracts users throughout thestate.
Multiple use/multiple-season use: Trail supportsmultiple uses and is available
year-round.
Recreational connections: Connecting users to various regional, state, and
national recreational sites and facilities.
Community connections: Trail connectsmultiple communities.
Critical trail network connection: Trail is part of a bigger bicycle/trail network.
Quality experiences: Trail ensures quality experience for users.
Partnership: Support from various public and private agencies, communities and
stakeholders to advocateand promotetrail use.
Funding:
State trails are typically funded by the State Legislature via bonding money or special
appropriations, or through the Legislative Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources
(LCCMR). Some federal grants are also eligible to be used in conjunction with state
funding for development. Local agencies maycontribute to funding development of state
trails.
K:\\010003-000\\Admin\\Docs\\Regional Trail Designation Memo\\Regional Trail Designation Memo.docx
Workshop Packet Page Number 100 of 106
E2, Attachment 2
Gold Line BRT Station Area Planning Multi-Use Trail Facilities Designation Process Overview
October 12,2018
Page 3
Process to add new corridor:
All state trails must be legislatively authorized/recognized under MS 85.015.After the
authorization of a state trail project, the State Legislature will approve a budget that will
be designated to the DNR. Then, the DNR with work closely with local and regional
agencies to implementthe project plan. Chapter 86A.09 of Minnesota Statutes requires
that a master plan be prepared for state trails before trail development can begin
although planning, design, and land acquisition can take place before the plan is
complete.
Gold Line Trail facilitiesreview:
The subject trail facilities do not generally meet the criteria for a state trail due to the
following considerations:
Would notprovideaccess or traverse high-quality natural areas,state-owned
park lands, or historic/culturally significant sites
Would not attract users at a statewide level
May not support motorized (snowmobiles, ATVs) or equestrian users
In addition, the legislative process and funding constraints at the state level may limit the
ability to advance trail development alongside the current Gold Line BRT timeframe.
B.Regional Trail: 2040 Regional Parks Plan
Summary/purpose:
Regional trails are part of the Metropolitan
Regional trailsgenerally consist ofa network of trail
corridors that connect regional parksand regional
park reserves, with many serving as linear
greenways for wildlife habitat, protecting natural
resources, and providing recreational opportunities.
Regional trails under the 2040 Parks Policy Plan
are categorizedinto two groups: destination and
linking trails. Destination trails focus on providing
pathways along high-quality natural, historical, or
scenic resources, making the trail itself a
destination. Linking trails serve as travel routes that
connectto regional parks and park amenities.
Recreation and preservation are key focuses for
the regional trail system. However, several popular
regional trails are built along former railroad
corridorsthatalso serveas commuter and
transportation routes for bikers.
The agency partners that own and operate the Regional Parks System are called
regional park implementing agencies.Once a parkor trailbecomes part of the Regional
Parks System, theMetropolitanCouncil supports it with coordinated regional planning,
funding, system protection, information, marketing, and advocacy.Ramsey County,
Washington County, and the City of St. Paul are three of the ten regional park
implementing agencies.Alignments of regional trails are determined by the
implementing agency. A master plan is required and must be consistent with the
K:\\010003-000\\Admin\\Docs\\Regional Trail Designation Memo\\Regional Trail Designation Memo.docx
Workshop Packet Page Number 101 of 106
E2, Attachment 2
Gold Line BRT Station Area Planning Multi-Use Trail Facilities Designation Process Overview
October 12,2018
Page 4
The 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan identifies approved existing/planned regional trail
corridors. The Plan also identifies search corridors where general connections or routes
are defined but alignments are yet to be determined. The master plan process is used to
define an alignment or more defined route for a search corridor.
Eligibility criteria:
The table below lists a set of requirements for regional trailsas addressed under the
criteria it must fulfill. However, depending on the category of the traildestination or
linkingthere is a subset of criteria the trail mustalsomeet.
Regional Trails: General Regional Trails: Destination Regional Trails: Linking
*Required(Also known as Greenways) *Required
*Required
* Serves a regional audience * Provides high-quality natural Links two or more units of
based on visitor origin and resource-the Regional Parks System
service-area research on trail experience
regional trails
* Benefits the regional trail *Highly scenic and/or natural Links to or complements
system and does not duplicate settingnational, state, regional,
an existing trailand/or other local trails
Connects two or more units of * Extensively visually Links to or complements
Regional Parks Systemseparated from road system federal, state, regional, or
(more than 50% off-road)multiple local parks,
recreation facilities, and
natural resource areas
Serves as backbone to local No spacing minimums* Should be at least 1.5
trail network, with regional trail miles apart so as not to
functioning much like regional overlap the localized service
highway that interconnects area of those trails. There
with more local arterials and are times when meandering
local streetslinking trails will comein
closer proximity to one
another, but broadly
speaking are not parallel
*Fills a gap in the regional * Provides opportunities to Maybe on-road separated
recreation systemconserve, enhance, or restore treadway
natural resources
Connects to multiple public May contain natural features
interest destinations such as in the greenway or adjacent
schools, job centers, tourist to the trail treadway that
destinations, historical, provides important ecological
cultural, and architectural services
buildings and sites, and
commercial districts
May utilize surface rights of
utility corridors such as large
sewer lines
Source: 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan, Metropolitan Council
Funding:
The Metropolitan Council contributes and administers funding to the regional park
implementingagencies. Funding for regional park/trail development is provided through
Regional Park Bonding Program and the Parks and Trails Legacy Fund Program.
Improvements must be consistent with approved master plans before being eligible for
K:\\010003-000\\Admin\\Docs\\Regional Trail Designation Memo\\Regional Trail Designation Memo.docx
Workshop Packet Page Number 102 of 106
E2, Attachment 2
Gold Line BRT Station Area Planning Multi-Use Trail Facilities Designation Process Overview
October 12,2018
Page 5
funding administered by the Metropolitan Council. Only regional park implementing
agencies qualify for the grant programs. Each regional park implementing agency also
provides their own mix of funding for their respective regional parks and trails. Other
funding sources also exist, including federal grants, public-private partnerships, and
private donations.
Process to add new corridor:
At the request of regional park implementing agencies, new regional trail corridors or
search corridors may be considered for incorporation into the Regional Parks Policy
Plan. This can be requested through a comprehensive plan update or through updates
to the Regional Parks Policy Plan. Local comprehensive plans are updated every ten
years (currently in process). The Regional Parks Policy Plan is updated every four years.
An update is currently underway and is expected to be approved by the end of 2018.
Funding constraints must also be considered. As new facilities added to the regional trail
system would compete with current agency funding priorities, the regional park
implementing agencies may not support new trail corridorsat this time.
Gold Line Trail facilities review:
There are currently no regional trail corridors or search corridors identified in the 2040
Regional Parks Policy Planalong the Gold Line BRT corridor. To the south of I-94, a
generally east-in
Ramsey and Washington Counties.The Gold Line BRT corridor willbe located in and
along the I-94 corridor, which does not include any high-quality natural resources or
scenic opportunities. The corridor isalso in close proximity to thepreviously defined
The Gold Line Corridor Traildoes not appear to meet the
trail criteria for a regional trail under the 2040 Parks Policy Plan.
The proposed I-94Maplewood trailbridge would serve as a connection to Battle Creek
Regional Park. However, the length of the connection, lack of natural resources in the
corridor, and lack of connection to regional park facilities to the north may hinder the
ability for the land bridge to be incorporated into the regional trail system.
C.Regional Bicycle Transportation Network(RBTN): 2040 Transportation Policy Plan
Summary/purpose:
The Regional Bicycle Transportation Network
(RBTN), established in the
2040 Transportation Policy Plan, is intended to
accommodating daily bicycle transportation needs
by establishing an integrated and seamless
network of on-street bikeways and off-road trails.
The network prioritizes corridors and alignments
for regional planning and transportation
investment. Cities, counties, regional park
implementing agencies and the state own and
maintain RBTNdesignated facilities.
The RBTN is based on a Regional Bicycle
System Study analysis and prioritization of
potential bicycle corridorscompleted in 2014. The
study incorporated factors such as bicycle trip
K:\\010003-000\\Admin\\Docs\\Regional Trail Designation Memo\\Regional Trail Designation Memo.docx
Workshop Packet Page Number 103 of 106
E2, Attachment 2
Gold Line BRT Station Area Planning Multi-Use Trail Facilities Designation Process Overview
October 12,2018
Page 6
demand, network connectivity, social equity, population density, regional job centers,
major destinations, and connections to transit. RBTN alignments are defined where
there are existing or planned bikeways, or a consensus of which roadways and planned
named where alignments have not yet been identified. The presence of corridors allows
orientation and uses on-street bikeways and off-road trails to achieve an efficient facility
route. Tier 1 corridors and alignments (highest priority) are planned in locations where
they can attract the most riders and most effectively enhance mode choice in favor of
biking, walking, and transit over driving alone.
Eligibility criteria:
A set of guiding principles forthe Regional Bicycle Transportation Network are defined in
the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan:
Overcome physical barriers and eliminate critical system gaps.
Facilitate safe and continuous trips to regional destinations.
Function as arteries to connectregional destinations and the transit system year-
round.
Accommodate a broad range of cyclist abilities and preferences to attract a wide
variety of users.
Integrate and/or supplement existing and planned infrastructure.
Provide improved opportunities to increase the share of trips made by bicycle.
Connect to local, state, and national bikeway networks.
Consider opportunities to enhance economic development.
Be equitably distributed throughout the region.
Follow spacing guidelines that reflect established development and
transportation patterns.
Consider priorities reflected in adopted plans.
Funding:
RBTN facilities are financed through the owner agency via capital improvement
programsorjoint powers agreements with partner agencies.Local contributions by the
owner agency are the primary source for development. Several state and federal
transportation funding grant opportunities can also be utilized.
A keytransportation funding grant source that agencies utilize is the Regional
Solicitation process.The Metropolitan Council and Transportation Advisory Board (TAB)
administer the Regional Solicitation process to distribute federal transportation funds
from the STBGP (formerly STP and TAP) and CMAQ programs to local agencies.
Roadway projects along A-Minor and non-freeway Principal Arterials are eligible, as well
as on-road and off-road bikeways defined in local plans. A total of approximately $20-36
million in federal funds is anticipated for themost recent 2018 solicitation(federal fiscal
years 2022 and 2023) for multi-use trail and bikeway projects.Bikeway and multi-use
trail projects that serve a transportation purpose can receive up to $5.5 million in federal
fundswith a 20 percent local match required.
The Regional Solicitationis a highly competitive processthat is typically released every
two years.Projects must demonstrate a regional benefit to score well. On-road and off-
road bikeways that are defined as part of the RBTN will score higher, as this criterionis
worth up to 18 percent of total eligible points.Access to regional transit facilities and
major employment centers is also a benefit.The next round is likely to occur in 2020for
federal fiscal years 2024 and 2025.Results would be finalized in 2021.
K:\\010003-000\\Admin\\Docs\\Regional Trail Designation Memo\\Regional Trail Designation Memo.docx
Workshop Packet Page Number 104 of 106
E2, Attachment 2
Gold Line BRT Station Area Planning Multi-Use Trail Facilities Designation Process Overview
October 12,2018
Page 7
Process to add newcorridor:
The RBTN is incorporated into the Transportation Policy Plan, whichis updated every
four years. An update is currently underway and is expected to be approved by the end
of 2018.In recent years, changes to the RBTN werealsoconsidered ahead of the
Regional Solicitation process. The Metropolitan Council will consider requests by local
agencies to update the RBTN based on the guiding principles described above.
The Metropolitan Council is currently in the process of defininga more formal structure
for reviewing and adopting future RBTN revisions. The process may be different for
revisions to alignments or corridors that are already in the Transportation Policy Plan
versus new alignments or corridors that are not part of the Transportation Policy Plan.
Thus, new alignments or corridors may require an update or amendment to the
Transportation Policy Plan.
Gold Line Trail facilities review:
Both the Gold Line Corridor Trail and the I-94 Maplewood trail bridge appear to meet the
guiding principlesfor the RBTN. Both proposed trail facilities would serve a regional
transportation purpose by connecting major employment centers and destinations to the
regional transit network across multiple jurisdictions. Both would also attract multiple
user groups and enhance access between the regional and local bikeway networks. The
I-94 Maplewood trail bridge would also overcome the physical barrier that limits
pedestrian and bicycle traffic across I-94, with a key connection between the 3M
employment center and the Battle Creek Regional Park. The trail bridge could be part of
a longer north-south route to serve as a bicycle arterial.
D.County Bikeways:Ramsey CountyComprehensive Plan
Washington County Comprehensive Plan
Summary/purpose:
Both Ramsey County and Washington County are in the process of updating their
comprehensive plans for the 2040 planning cycle. Both draft plans discuss multi-use
trails in their respective Parks and Trails chapters and Transportation chapters. Both
countie-use facilities that are within a county
road corridor. Both counties also have trails that are within county park facilities. As
regional park implementing agencies, each county also owns and operates regional
trails. County trails may also be a part of the RBTN.
Gold Line Trail facilities review:
County trails are mainly used to serve county park areas and are for leisure and
recreational usesor are located along county roadways for transportation purposes.
Since the subject trail facilities are not along county roadways or within county owned
parkland, the county trail designation does not apply.
3. Public/Private Partnership
Public/private partnershipscould advance trail development by using private funds to fill
funding gaps. Public/private partnershipsnot only help reduce project costsfor municipal,
county, or state agenciesbut it also gives the opportunity for development and growth.
Private companies may be willing to invest in trail development if it provides needed
infrastructure to grow or improve access for its workforce. Local agencies need to consider
long-term maintenance and operation costs as well as its own policies related to
public/private partnerships before pursuing this as an option.
K:\\010003-000\\Admin\\Docs\\Regional Trail Designation Memo\\Regional Trail Designation Memo.docx
Workshop Packet Page Number 105 of 106
E2, Attachment 2
Gold Line BRT Station Area Planning Multi-Use Trail Facilities Designation Process Overview
October 12,2018
Page 8
4.Recommendationsand Next Steps
Based on the review of the system plans and trail designations referenced above, the
proposedGold Line Corridor Trail and I-94 Maplewood trail bridge best fit within the criteria
for the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) as part of the 2040 Transportation
Policy Plan. Both proposed trails would serve a transportation purpose, improve access for
bicyclists of all abilities, connect major employment centers and the regional transitway
system, and reduce barriers for bicycle travel along and across the I-94 corridor.
Should the trails be incorporated into the RBTN, this would increase the scoring potential for
aRegional Solicitation Multi-Use Trail and Bicycle Facility application. The RBTN status is
not required tobe eligible and apply under the Regional Solicitation, however it is a major
consideration as points are awarded.
To pursue the RBTN status for the subject trails, the following is recommended:
Local agencies incorporate the proposed trails into their comprehensive plans.Local
agencies can also use comprehensive plans to recommend locally preferred RBTN
corridors and set the stage for future updates to the RBTN.
Discuss the trail facilities with Gold Line partner agencies to continue building support
for the projects and potential incorporation or coordination with Gold Line project
development.
Determine the lead agency to advance project development.
Discuss the trail facilities with Metropolitan Council staff to determine RBTN eligibility
and schedule for future updates to the RBTNand incorporation into the 2040
Transportation Policy Plan.Determine if there is the opportunity to incorporate the trail
facilities into the RBTN prior the next round of the Regional Solicitation in 2020.
Local agencies could also consider policies and concerns regarding public/private
partnerships should opportunities arise.In addition, tobe prepared for future transportation
grants funding opportunities (including the Regional Solicitation), the lead agency should
begin the designphase forthe proposed trail projects.
5. Document References
Minnesota State Parks and Trails System Plan:
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/input/mgmtplans/strategic_plan/system_plan.html
2040 Transportation Policy Plan:
https://metrocouncil.org/Transportation/Planning-2/Key-Transportation-Planning-
Documents/Transportation-Policy-Plan.aspx?source=child
2040Regional Parks Policy Plan:
https://metrocouncil.org/Parks/Planning/Parks-Policy-Plan.aspx
Ramsey County 2040 Comprehensive Plan(Draft):
https://www.ramseycounty.us/your-government/projects-initiatives/comprehensive-plan
Ramsey County Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan:
https://www.ramseycounty.us/residents/parks-recreation/active-living/countywide-
bicycle-pedestrian-plan
Washington County 2040 Comprehensive Plan(Draft):
https://www.co.washington.mn.us/404/Comprehensive-Plan
K:\\010003-000\\Admin\\Docs\\Regional Trail Designation Memo\\Regional Trail Designation Memo.docx
Workshop Packet Page Number 106 of 106