The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-01-12 HPC Packet AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HERITAGE PRESERVATIONCOMMISSION 7:00 P.M Thursday,January 12, 2017 City Hall, Council Chambers A.CALL TO ORDER B.ROLL CALL C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA D.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.December 8, 2016 E.NEW BUSINESS 1.2016 Demolition Report 2.2016 AnnualReport 3.2017 Goals F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1.Nominations for Heritage Preservation Award 2.Gladstone Savanna Well and Interpretive Sitting Area 3.Gladstone Savanna Local Designation G.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1.Maplewood Area Historical Society Update H.COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS th Anniversary Celebration --Committee Update 1.60 I.STAFF PRESENTATIONS J.ADJOURNMENT RULES OF CIVILITY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND OUR COMMUNITY Following are rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Commission Meetings -elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Commission meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Speak only for yourself, not for other Commissionmembers or citizens -unless specifically tasked by your colleagues to speak for the group or for citizens in the form of a petition. Show respect during comments and/or discussions, listen actively and do not interrupt or talk amongst each other. Be respectful of the process, keeping order and decorum. Do not be critical of Commissionmembers, staff or others in public. Be respectful of each other’s timekeeping remarks brief, to the point and non-repetitive. D1 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION 7:00p.m., Thursday, December 8, 2016 Council Chambers, City Hall A.CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and called to order by Vice ChairCurrieat 7:02 p.m. B.ROLL CALL Commissioners Chairperson Peter BoulayAbsent Commissioner Bob CardinalPresent Commissioner Richard CurriePresent Commissioner John GasparPresent Commissioner Frank GilbertsonAbsent Staff Natural Resources Coordinator, Ginny GaynorPresent C.APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Commissioner Cardinalmoved to approve the agenda. Seconded by Commissioner GasparAyes – All The motion passed. D.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.November 10, 2016 HPC Meeting Minutes Commissioner Cardinalmoved to approve the minutes from the November 10,2016 HPC Meeting. Seconded by Vice Chair CurrieAyes – All The motion passed. E.NEW BUSINESS F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1.Nominations for Heritage Award Natural Resources Coordinator, Ginny Gaynor, briefly went over the narratives for each of the nominees for the Heritage Award. Commissioner Cardinal moved to table the vote for the Heritage Award until January 12. Thursday, December 8, 2016 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes D1 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION 7:00p.m., Thursday, December 8, 2016 Council Chambers, City Hall Seconded by Commissioner GasparAyes – All The motion passed. Commissioner Cardinal moved that if memberscannot be presentfor the vote on the Heritage Awardthey communicate their vote to chair. Seconded by Commissioner GasparAyes – All The motion passed. 2.Gladstone Savanna Well and Interpretive Sitting Area Natural Resources Coordinator, Ginny Gaynor, updated the commission on the Gladstone Savanna Well and Interpretive Sitting Area. Commissioner Cardinal moved to table the Gladstone Savanna Well and Interpretive Sitting Area until the January 12, 2017 Heritage Preservation Commission meeting. Seconded by Vice Chair Currie Ayes – All The motion passed. 3.Local Designation Natural Resources Coordinator, Ginny Gaynor, discussed the Local Designation timeline for Gladstone Savanna with the commission. Vice Chair Currie moved to put local designation approval on the January 2017 agenda. Seconded by Commissioner Cardinal Ayes – All The motion passed. G.VISITOR PRESENTATION 1.Maplewood Area Historical Society(MAHS) Maplewood Area Historical Society President, Bob Jensen, updated the commission on the upcomingMAHSevents. H.COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS I.STAFF PRESENTATIONS J.ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Curriemoved to adjourn the meeting. Thursday, December 8, 2016 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes D1 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION 7:00p.m., Thursday, December 8, 2016 Council Chambers, City Hall Seconded by Commissioner GasparAyes – All The motion passed. The meeting was adjourned at 8:06PM. Next meeting isJanuary 12, 2016. Thursday, December 8, 2016 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes E1 MEMORANDUM TO:Heritage Preservation Commission FROM:Jason Brash, Building Official Ginny Gaynor, Natural Resources Coordinator/HPC Liaison DATE:January 12, 2017 SUBJECT:2016Demolition Report Introduction The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) has requestedthat staff presents ademolition report each yearto provide a record of the buildings or sitesthat weredemolishedand to provide an opportunity for commissioners to commentontheirhistorical significance in the city. Discussion The followingproperties receiveda permitto demolish a building in 2016. Photos of these structures are provided in Attachment 1. 2616 Linwood Avenue East(due to house fire) 2595 Pond Avenue East (due to house fire) 775 Century Avenue South 1965 County Road D East (Taco Bell) In addition to the above structures, permits to demolish garageswere received from: 2705 Stillwater Road East 1905 McKnight Road North 2242 Duluth Street North 918 McKnight Road North 84 Farrell Street North 2160 Arcade Street North 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East 2664 Gem Street North 2256 Hazel Street North 22 McClelland Street North 751 Roselawn Avenue East 1077 SterlingStreet North 2325 Maryland Avenue East 1383 Belmont Lane East Mr. Brashwill attend the HPC meeting to address any questions about demolition. Recommendation Reviewand make recommendation onthe HPC demolition report for 2016. Attachments 1.Photos of buildingsthat received demolition permits(excluding garages) E1, Attachment 1 Attachment 1 2616 Linwood AvenueEast 2595 Pond Avenue 2 E1, Attachment 1 775 Century Avenue South 1965 County Road D East –Taco Bell 3 E2 MEMORANDUM TO: Melinda Coleman,City Manager FROM:Heritage Preservation Commission Ginny Gaynor, Natural Resources Coordinator/HPC Staff Liaison DATE: XXXX, 2017 SUBJECT:Approval of 2016Heritage Preservation CommissionAnnual Report Introduction The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) approvedtheir annual report on January 12, 2017,and submits it for council approval. Discussion 2016 HPC ANNUAL REPORT Members The HPC consists of sevenmembers appointed by the city council. In 2016, Robert Creager and Brenda Rudberg left the commission because they moved out of Maplewood. The current membership is as follows: CommissionerMembership Began Term Expires Peter Boulay(Chair)10-09-0604-30-18 Richard Currie(Vice Chair)01-26-0404-30-19 John Gaspar01-14-1304-30-17 Frank Gilbertson09-09-1304-30-19 Robert Cardinal01-25-1604-30-19 The staff liaison isGinny Gaynor, Natural Resources Coordinator. Council liaison to the HPC in 2016was Tou Xiong. Meetings The HPC’s regularly scheduled meetings are the second Thursday of themonth at 7:00 p.m. In 2016, the HPC held tenmeetings. Designated Sites as of December 31, 2016 City of Maplewood Has DesignatedOne SiteLocally Owner: City of Maplewood Bruentrup Heritage Farm Site,2170 County Rd D,Maplewood, MN 55109 1 E2 OnePropertyin the Cityis on the National Register Owner: Ramsey County Ramsey County Poor Farm Barn 2020 White Bear Ave,Maplewood, MN 55109 Inventory of Historic Buildings Maplewood maintains an inventory of historic homesand structures, which was developed by the HPC and Maplewood Area Historical Society. Reviews and Accomplishments 1. Satisfactorily performedthe responsibilities listed inthe MN Certified Local Government (CLG)Procedures Manualand those specifically delegated to it under the Act by the MinnesotaState Historic Preservation Office (SHPO): The City of Maplewood HPC has demonstrated an active commitment per the MinnesotaCLG Procedures Manual. No newlocal designations were made in 2016.TheHPCdeveloped procedures for local designation in 2015 and worked on designation for Gladstone Savanna Neighborhood Preserve. They anticipate completing designation of this site in early 2017. Norenovation requests were submitted or reviewedfor a siteon the National Register. No NationalRegister nominationswere commented on or submitted to the SHPO. Staff member Gaynorattended theannual Minnesota State Preservationconference. 2.The HPC recommended the Bruentrup Familyfor the 2015Maplewood Heritage Award. The Maplewood Heritage Award is an annual award recognizing an individual who has positively influenced our city’s past or strengthened the preservation of Maplewood history. 3.The following guest speakers gave historical presentations atHPC meetings: Mr. Samuel Joy and Mr. William Mason on the Joy family history. 4.The HPC recognized the following buildings that were demolished in2016: 2616 Linwood Avenue East 2595 Pond Avenue East 775 Century Avenue South 1965County Road D East 5.The HPC reviewed the following projects: Re-staining the barn at Bruentrup Heritage Farm, a locally designated site. Concept plans for Gladstone Savanna landscape improvements. 6.The HPC worked with aconsultant to develop anInterpretive Sign Plan for Gladstone Savanna. 7.The HPC developed the Century Homes Program, honoring homes over 100 years old. th Homes will be honored at the 60Anniversary Celebration. 8.The HPC partnered with MAHS and City of Maplewood to work on the 60 Stories Project. From January 7, 2016 through February 23, 2017, the partners areissuingone story aboutMaplewood history each week via the City’swebsite, Twitter, and Facebook. th 9.The HPC began planning Maplewood 60Anniversary Celebration, in partnership with MAHS. 2 E2 Outside Activities Several HPC members are also members of MAHSand worked collaboratively on society events. Conclusion The Maplewood HeritagePreservation Commission is committed to promoting the use and conservation of historic properties for the education, inspiration, pleasure and enrichment of the citizens of this area. 2017Goals TheHPC approved the following goals for 2017: \[Insert 2017goals\] Budget Impact None. Recommendation Approvethe 2016 Heritage Preservation Commission Annual Report. 3 E3 MEMORANDUM TO:Heritage Preservation Commission FROM:Ginny Gaynor, Natural Resources Coordinator/HPC Liaison DATE:January 12, 2017 RE:2017Commission Goals Introduction At theJanuary Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) meeting, commissioners will begin developinggoals for 2017. Discussion Each year theHPC setsgoals for the next twelve months. The HPC’s 2016Goals were: 1.Continue 60 stories project. 2.Plan Trivia Contest and any associated 60th anniversary activities. 3.Make recommendation for 2016 Maplewood Heritage Award. 4.Designate Gladstone Savanna as a local historic site. 5.Review Century Homes and Businesses and outline procedures for this program. 6.Write grant and RFP to conduct survey of residential properties. 7.Create sign for Lookout Park. 8.Create Sign Plan for Gladstone Savanna. Some of the 2016 goals have not been completed and should be carried over into 2017. In addition, the HPC should consider additional goals. In 2017, the City will begin working on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This is a city-wide plan, which includes a chapter on Historic Preservation. In addition, the HPC’s help has been requested for an interpretive sign for the Conifer Ridge property. These projectsshould be considered as well as additional projectsthe HPC may deema priority. Based on the above, here is a list ofsome potential2017 goals. th 1.Complete 60 stories project and 60Anniversary Celebration. 2.Designate Gladstone Savanna. 3.Begin designation for additional site. 4.Write grant to continue survey and preservation planning work. 5.Complete interpretive signs for Lookout Park and Conifer Ridge. 6.Work with consultant onGladstone Savanna signage. 7.Begin work on 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 8.Other goals proposed by HPC. E3 Commissioners may wish to review recommendations from the Historic Context Study prior to setting goals. Commissioners have copies of this document and it is available online at:http://www.maplewoodmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11374. Recommendation Develop HPC goals for 2017. Attachments None F1 MEMORANDUM TO:Heritage Preservation Commission FROM:Ginny Gaynor, Natural Resources Coordinator/HPC Staff Liaison DATE:January 12, 2017 SUBJECT:Nominations for Heritage Preservation Award Introduction The Maplewood Heritage Award is an annual award recognizing an individual who has positively influenced Maplewood’spast or significantly contributed tothe preservation of the city’s history. Discussion At the November 10, 2016Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) meeting, commissioners nominated candidates for the 2016 MaplewoodHeritage Award. At the December 8, 2016 HPC meeting, commissioners reviewed contributions of each candidate but decided to delay selecting a winneruntil the January meeting when more commissioners were present. Nominees for the 2016 Maplewood Heritage Award Lois Behm Instrumental in kicking off the commission andthe society in the early 1990's Helped rescue the New Canada township records, understood their importance Tookthe minutes for the commission for the first 15 years or so Treasurer of MAHS for many years and was instrumental keeping the society on track for its formative years Joe Fox Involved in trying to start the Maplewood Area Historical Society (MAHS) at the Ostergren farm MAHS member Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission 1970-1985. This period saw the establishment of the PAC Fund and of Maplewood Nature Center. Ramsey County FairBoard – member for 50 years and manager for 30 years Ramsey County Historical Society memberand Gibbs Farm board member Active member of numerous civic groups Albert E. Galbraith Jr. First president of the Maplewood Area Historical Society and Commission F1 MAHS member Worked for the Minnesota Historical Society in charge of historical sites. Started Northeast Soccer Association Gladstone Redevelopment Task Force Member Bruce Mogren Was instrumental in preserving the Bruentrup Farm Has supported Maplewood Area Historical Society fundraising efforts and Johnny Appleseed Days Brenda Rudberg HPC member April 2011-May 2016 Left the HPC when she moved to St. Paul, but continued to work on the 60 Stories project MAHS member Learned aboutpreservation planning requirements and opportunities and helped guide commission on what its next steps should be Staff and HPC appreciated her thoughtfulness, knowledge, and willingness to take on history projects outside the HPC meetings Came up with the idea for the 60 Stories project and wrote several stories for the series,manyof which required research Prepared first draft ofthe grant for the Historic Context Study Organized a meetingwithRamsey County Historical Society(RCHS), which led to a partnership with RCHSon the Fish Creek Archeology Project Recommendation The HPC shall vote on a recommendation for the 2016 Maplewood Heritage Award. Attachments None F2 MEMORANDUM TO:Heritage Preservation Commission FROM:Ginny Gaynor, Natural Resources Coordinator/HPC Liaison DATE:January 12, 2017 SUBJECT:Gladstone Savanna Well and Interpretive Sitting Area Introduction Maplewood Parks and Recreation Department isworking on Phase III improvements at Gladstone Savanna Neighborhood Preserve, which includes a sitting and interpretive area at the location of the well. Discussion Gladstone Savanna Neighborhood Preserve is a park and preserve managed by Maplewood’s Parks and Recreation Department. It was formerly the site of the Gladstone Shops of the St. Paul and Duluth Railroad. No historic buildings remain on the site. However, there are several historic foundations underground.City Council approved the Site Master Plan in 2011 (Attachment 1), after a public planning process and recommendation by the HPCand other commissions. At the September 8, 2016 HPC meeting, commissioners reviewed landscape design concepts for the preserve. At the November 10, 2016 HPC meeting, commissioners reviewed a revised concept design for the interpretive/sitting area near the well.Based on concerns about the well, staff suggested changing the circular bench in the design concept to a planting circle. Commissioners requested that staff provide additional information on the well prior to the taking action on the landscape concept. At the December 8, 2016 HPC meeting, staff presented historic information on the well and reviewed documents approvedpreviously by HPC and by City Council (site master planand sign plan) that call for a landscape featureat the well. In addition, staff provided information on soil remediation that was required for on the site. The HPC discussed the proposed concept for the sitting area but decidedto delay recommendation on this project until January when more HPC commissioners would be present. Staff indicated that this item would be on the January agenda, but due to the project schedule the detailed design work would proceedwith the revised concept of a planting bed over the well. Attached is the revised concept for the wellsitting/interpretive area (Attachment 2).More extensive information on this project wasprovided in the December 2016 HPC packet and commissioners are encouraged to review that information prior to the January meeting. F2 Recommendation The HPC shall review and discuss the revised concept plan. Attachment 1.Approved Master Plan 2.Concept Plan for Well Interpretive Area F2, Attachment 1 F2, Attachment 2 F3 MEMORANDUM TO: Heritage Preservation Commission FROM:Ginny Gaynor, Natural Resources Coordinator/HPC Staff Liaison DATE: January 12, 2017 RE: Local Designation for Gladstone Savanna Introduction The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)is working on designatingGladstone Savanna as a locally significant historic site. Background In 2015, the HPC developed procedures, eligibility criteria, and an application form for the City’s local designation program. This program honors and protects historic buildings and sites that are significant locally. Locally designated sites requirea review by the HPC prior to alteration. At the November 2016 HPC meeting, commissioners reviewed a partial draft of the application designating Gladstone Savanna. The completed application is attached (Attachment 1). This includes changes requested. Newcontent includesthe Architectural History Survey/Inventory of Structures, maps, and photographs, references, and archeological site form. After approval by HPC, the next steps in designation are: 1.Review and recommendation by Parks and Recreation Commission 2.Public hearing at Planning Commission Meeting 3.Review and recommendation by City Council Recommendation Review, discuss, and suggest changes to the draft applicationforlocal designation for the Gladstone Savanna site. Attachment 1.Application Form for Gladstone Savanna F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 a.The property is associated with significant events or period that exemplifies broad patterns of cultural, political, economic or social history. b.The property’s character, interest or value is part of the history or cultural heritage of the city, state, or nation. c.The property embodies distinctive characteristics of an architectural or engineering type or style, or elements of design, detail materials, method of construction, or craftsmanship. d.The property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. F3, Attachment 1 not F3, Attachment 1 A Non-Invasive Archeological Investigation at the Gladstone Savanna Neighborhood Preserve and Gloster Park. ArchaeologicalMonitoring and VisualAssessmentfor the Gladstone Savanna NeighborhoodPreserve and Gloster Park Project. F3, Attachment 1 Minnesota ArcheologicalSiteForm for the Gladstone Shops F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 F3, Attachment 1 Cultural Resource Assessment for the Maplewood Gladstone Neighborhood Alternative Urban Areawide Review. A Non-Invasive Archeological Investigation at the Gladstone Savanna Neighborhood Preserve and Gloster Park. The Lost City of Gladstone. A Walking Tour of Gladstone. Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Gladstone Savanna/Gloster Park Master Plan. Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan, Historical Atlas of Early New Canada Township, Gladstone Savanna Site Analysis and Ecological Survey. Chronology of Gladstone Volunteer FireDepartment, . Cultural Resources Assessmentforthe Maplewood GladstoneNeighborhood. MapofRamsey County, Historic and Significant Structures and Sites ArchaeologicalMonitoring and VisualAssessmentfor the Gladstone Savanna NeighborhoodPreserve and Gloster Park Project,City of Maplewood, RamseyCounty, Minnesota Minnesota ArcheologicalSite Form for the Gladstone Shops. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps for Gladstone,Minnesota. MDH, City of Maplewood, and Well Contractor Dig Deep to find Abandoned Railroad Well F3, Attachment 1 The GladstoneShops of the St. Paul andDuluthR.R. Minnesota Railroads. F3, Attachment 1 Rev.: 7/1/09 MINNESOTA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHAEOLOGIST Fort Snelling History Center, St. Paul, MN 55111 (612) 725-2729 SITE #: 21RA0070 Site Name: Gladstone Shops Agency/Field #: N/A (OSA assigns if New Site) X New Site Site Update OSA License #: 2012: 12-022 SHPO RC #: Type of Fieldwork: _X_ Reconnaissance/Phase I Date(s) of This Fieldwork: 6/18, 6/25, 7/5, and 8/23 (2012) ___ Evaluation/Phase II ___ Excavation/Phase III NRHP Status: Listed Determined Eligible CEF(106) CNEF(106) X Undetermined LOCATIONAL INFORMATION County: Ramsey City/Twp. Name: City of Maplewood SHPO Sub-Region: 4e (see map in instructions) USGS 7.5' Quadrangle Map (name and year):St. Paul East, Minn. 1967, revised 1993 Township: 29N Range: 22W Section: 16 ¼ Sections (at least 2): NE-SE Township: Range: Section: ¼ Sections (at least 2): Township: Range: Section: ¼ Sections (at least 2): UTM Coordinates: (less than 10 acres use center; over 10 acres define polygon around site; draw points on USGS) Zone: _15N_ Datum: ___ 1927 _X_ 1983 Method: ___ USGS Map _X_ GPS ___ Other Point 1: Easting 496082.82526074676 Northing 4982862.731404791 Point 2: Easting 496366.56427617476 Northing 4982862.563674701 Point 3: Easting 496382.3212621632 Northing 4982851.445995168 Point 4: Easting 496390.0773388278 Northing 4982629.266960104 Point 5: Easting 496082.68217759224 Northing 4982629.448098655 SITE CHARACTERISTICS Acreage: 22.1061 acres Site Dimensions: N-S 746.642 feet (227.58 meters) E-W 1,002.347 feet (305.52 meters) Maximum Cultural Depth (if known) _Unknown__ Site Description ( all that apply, but only one check per line): single artifact lithic scatter X artifact scatter burial mound (number of mounds ) non-mound lone grave non-mound cemetery petroglyph pictograph petroform X surface features (list below) other: Surface Features ( all that apply): earthwork X pit/depression X foundation/ruin other: Inferred Site Function ( all that apply): habitation mortuary farm X industrial X transportation Other (list): unknown Current Land Use (list approximate % for allthat apply): cultivated fallow commercial 100 % recreational industrial residential woodland grassland ____ water-covered other: Surface Visibility (list approximate % for allthat apply): excellent X (50 to 75%) good fair poor/none Degree of Disturbance (list approximate % for allthat apply or unassessed): minimal moderate heavy completely destroyed X unassessed Current Threats to Site: ( all that apply or none known) erosion X development agricultural other: none known F3, Attachment 1 Rev.: 7/1/09 MINNESOTA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM page 2 SITE #: 21RA0070 Site Name: Gladstone Shops Agency/Field #: N/A CULTURAL/TEMPORAL AFFILIATION (list all that apply by level of certainty: 1 = confirmed; 2 = probable or ”not determined”): Period: not determined Contact (1650-1837) Precontact (9500 BC - 1650 AD) X Post-Contact (1837-1945) Precontact Context:(list all that apply by level of certainty; if unable to discern specific context, here ) N/A Paleoindian Tradition not determined Folsom Lanceolate Point/Plano Clovis Eastern Fluted other: Archaic Tradition not determined Prairie Riverine Shield Lake-Forest other: not determined Fox Lake Laurel Woodland Tradition SE Mn Early C Mn Transitional Lake Benton Brainerd Blackduck-Kathio Psinomani/Sandy Lake Havana-Related SE Mn Late Rainy River Late other: Plains Village Tradition not determined Cambria Great Oasis Big Stone other: Mississippian Tradition not determined Silvernale other: not determined Blue Earth Orr other: Oneota Tradition that apply by level of certainty; if unable to discern specific context, here ) N/A Contact Context:(list all American Indian not determined Dakota Ojibwe other: Euro-American not determined British other: French Initial US Post-Contact Context:(list all that apply by level of certainty; if unable to discern specific context, here ) Indian Communities & Reservations (1837-1934) St. Croix Triangle Lumbering (1830s-1900s) Early Agriculture & River Settlement (1840-1870) X Railroads & Agricultural Development (1870-1940) Northern MN Lumbering (1870-1930s) Iron Ore Industry (1880s-1945) Tourism & Recreation (1870-1945) Urban Centers (1870-1940) Approximate Post-Contact Occupation/Site Formation Date(s): train repair facility ca. 1887- 1910s all that apply): Context Assignment/Dating Methods( artifact type/style feature type radiometric relative stratigraphy geomorphology _ historic accounts (list) X historic maps (list) Northern Pacific Railway 1915 “Plan of Shops at Gloster, Minn.” 1”=50.’ Office of Chief Engineer, St. Paul, Minnesota. other(s) (specify): (For radiometric dates, attach photocopies of laboratory sheets if available.) MATERIALS PRESENT ( all that apply): Basic Artifact Categories Ceramics Lithics Biological Remains Historic Materials Aboriginal projectile points animal X glass Euro-American other chipped stone tools human X metal debitage unidentified bone X brick ground/pecked stone seeds/nuts X other: limestone blocks FCR charcoal aboriginal copper wood F3, Attachment 1 Rev.: 7/1/09 MINNESOTA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM page 3 SITE #: 21RA0070 Site Name: Gladstone Shops Agency/Field #: N/A Major Exotic Materials( all that apply): catlinite native copper Hixton orthoquartzite Knife River Flint obsidian other: Diagnostic Artifacts: Ceramics: Prehistoric Types/Wares/Temper Historic Prehistoric Lithics: Glass: Metal: Other: ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Current Topographic Setting( all that apply): Riverine Lacustrine Away from Water X general upland fan inlet/outlet terrace edge terrace/bluff top peninsula hilltop stream-stream junction island glacial beach ridge bluff-base isthmus rock outcrop cave/rockshelter general shoreline other: floodplain bog/slough/lake bottom other: other: Topographic Feature Name from USGS Map: _N/A______________________________________________ OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Source and Date of Ownership Information (e.g., plat map, county recorder's office, personal communication, etc.): City of Maplewood, 2012 here ): Ownership Type (list approximate % for allthat apply; if unknown Federal State X Local (public) Tribal Private Land Owner (name and address if known):City of Maplewood, 1830 County Road B East, Maplewood, MN 55109 CURRENT INVESTIGATION INFORMATION Methods/Techniques Employed ( all that apply): informant report small diameter soil coring ( 1" diameter) X surface survey shovel testing formal test units mechanical testing max. test depth geomorphological survey (specify): geophysical survey (specify): other: Informant Name and Address (if known): N/A Known Collectors/Collections: N/A Artifact Repository (name and accession numbers or repository agreement number): N/A Most Recent Survey Report – Title, Author, Date: Ollila, Laurie 2012 Archaeological Monitoring and Visual Assessment for the Gladstone Savanna Neighborhood Preserve and Gloster Park Project, City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Prepared for the City of Maplewood. Ollila, Laurie 2012 Addendum for theArchaeological Monitoring and Visual Assessment for the Gladstone Savanna Neighborhood Preserve and Gloster Park Project, City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Prepared for the City of Maplewood. Major Previous Bibliographic Reference(s) to Site: Schwietz, William T. 1977 The Gladstone Shops of the St. Paul and Duluth R.R. St. Paul, Minnesota. Principal Investigator (name and affiliation):Laurie Ollila, M.A., RPA; Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. F3, Attachment 1 Rev.: 7/1/09 MINNESOTA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM - CONTINUATION SHEET page 4 SITE #: 21RA0070 Site Name: Gladstone Shops Agency/Field #: N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Reason for Update or Survey, Location, Site Characteristics, Materials Present, Setting, Archaeological Methods, etc.; attach extra sheets as needed.) The Gladstone Shops were constructed in association with the St. Paul and Duluth Railroad beginning in 1887. They originally comprised a 25-stall roundhouse; a large shop building containing a builder shop, machine shop, tin shop, tool room, kettles, steam engine room, boiler room, shavings room, wheel shop, two wood shops, and an erecting shop; a paint shop; a combination store room and office building; a repair shop; a blacksmith shop; a brass foundry; a gas house; turn tables; a 100’ smokestack; a transfer table; a sand bin; a 640-foot-deep well; a water tank; a dryer and sand shed; lumber sheds; iron bins; privies; coal sheds; iron and bolt sheds; and repair tracks. The St. Paul and Duluth Railroad was acquired by the Northern Pacific Railroad in 1900. The shops remained in operation until the early twentieth century, and were leased by various other companies beginning in 1916. During the 1940s, most of the track, as well as the boiler room, engine room, smoke stack, and roundhouse were removed from the site, and a steel water tower was installed. By 1980, the remaining shops and structures on the site had been demolished. Archaeological monitoring and visual reconnaissance was conducted in June and July of 2012. During the investigation, 37 features were identified. Monitoring A foundation (Feature 37, F37) was identified running north-to-south through the center of the excavation area approximately 50 centimeters (19.7 inches) below the ground surface. This foundation was composed of stacked limestone blocks that extended to a depth of approximately 2.2 meters (7.22 feet) and rested upon a wider limestone base. Measurements of this base could not be obtained due to excavation constraints. Each limestone block measured approximately 90 to 95 centimeters (35.4 to 37.4 inches) wide, 45 to 50 centimeters (17.7 to 19.7 inches) tall, and 3 meters (9.8 feet) long. This foundation is in the approximate location of the eastern wall of the machine shop as depicted on an 1891 historical map and visible on a 1940 aerial photograph of the project area. Two distinct soil profiles were observed during the removal of the contaminated soil from the excavation area. The eastern half of the excavation area immediately east of the foundation contained a thin layer of organic debris and grass, beneath which was an approximately 50-centimeter (19.7-inch)-thick horizon of shiny, black, and brittle-looking loam-based soil with an abundance of burned and highly fragmented coal and occasional metal fragments was noted. Beneath this contaminated layer, a horizon of homogenous sand was encountered. This sand was typically light brown in color, though in the northeast quarter of the excavation area the soil transitioned from light brown sand to a medium brown sand containing cobbles. Although the soil remediation plan only required the excavation to extend to four feet below the ground surface, additional soil removal at the southern end of the excavation area revealed that the light brown sand extended to approximately 2.7 meters (8.9 feet) below the ground surface and rested directly upon a very black, dense, clay-based soil. The sand was likely brought into the area to build-up and/or level off the landscape in advance of the construction of the railroad facilities, and the accumulation of contaminated soils above it resulted from years of industrial operations associated with engine and boxcar construction, maintenance, and modification. The western half of the excavation area immediately west of the foundation exhibited a thin layer of organic debris and grass beneath which heavily mottled soils containing building debris including limestone, brick, mortar, and ferrous fragments, and a steel cable were observed. In the southwest quarter of the excavation area, these mottled soils continued to the final excavation depth of four feet below the ground surface, though the density of construction debris decreased significantly with depth. In the northwest quarter of the excavation area, sandy, lighter-colored soils similar to those observed in the eastern half of the excavation area were noted directly beneath the mottled horizon at a depth of approximately four feet below the ground surface. Additionally, a lens of ash measuring up to 10 centimeters (3.9 inches) thick and 1 meter (3.28 feet) wide was observed near the center of the western wall of the excavation area approximately 1 meter (3.28 feet) below the surface. The heavily disturbed appearance of the soils and abundance of building materials in this portion of the excavation area suggests that the machine shop was backfilled with demolition debris when the building was torn down during the late 1970s. Visual Reconnaissance At the time of the reconnaissance, a large portion of the eastern half of the project location had recently been cleared of mature trees and other vegetation, resulting in the deposition of a loamy and woody layer of organic material across the eastern half of the APE. This layer ranged from a few centimeters thick to over a foot in depth. The western half of the project area contained low, scrubby grasses, which afforded less than 10 percent ground surface visibility. Dense trees, w ditch containing utilities was shrubs, and undergrowth bordered the eastern and southern ends of the APE, and a shallo F3, Attachment 1 7/1/09 MINNESOTA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM - CONTINUATION SHEET page 5 SITE #: 21RA0070 Site Name: Gladstone Shops Agency/Field #: N/A present along the south side of Frost Avenue. During the walkover, 36 additional features were identified. Due to the contaminated nature of the site, artifacts were not collected. Several features associated with the former roundhouse were identified during the survey. Features 1 through 4 (F1 - F4) and Features 30 through 34 (F30 – F34) comprise exposures of poured concrete slabs located in the vicinity of the former roundhouse. At the time of the survey, all of the concrete slabs were at least partially covered by soil, so obtaining exact measurements of individual slabs was not always possible. Two distinct slab types were identified. The first type of slab was very regular in shape, measuring approximately 35 centimeters (13.8 inches) wide and up to 2 meters (6.6 feet) long. These slabs were arranged end-to-end in a linear fashion and radiated outward from the location of the former roundhouse turntable. Features 30 through 31 are four such sets of slabs that are roughly parallel with each other and measure approximately 2.4 to 3.0 meters (8 to 10 feet) apart. The distance between the sets suggests that they may have served as wall and/or partition sills between each locomotive bay. It was noted that the location of the former turntable appeared somewhat lower than the surrounding landscape, and contained a large cottonwood tree. At the time of the survey, the western edge of Feature 4 was visible. It was revealed that the 10-centimeter (3.9-inch)-thick, linear slabs actually rested directly upon several courses of yellow brick with mortar that extended to an unknown depth. The second type of slab was noticeably wider and broader than its more linear counterpart, and appeared to bridge the gap between some, but not all, of the linear slab arrangements. These broader slabs may have served as part of the roundhouse floor, an example of which was present between Features 31 and 32. Areas were these larger slabs were noticeably absent between the linear slabs may indicate the location of former maintenance pits that were typically situated between the track supports in each engine stall to allow railroad workers to access the underside of the locomotive engines. Features 5 through 8 (F5 – F8) are comprised of long, linear slabs of limestone arranged end-to-end that radiate outward from the roundhouse turntable. Each individual slab measured up to 1 meter (3.28 feet) wide and 3 meters (9.8 feet) long. Abundant coal and slag fragments were observed around Feature 5, and window glass fragments and red and yellow brick fragments were noted near the southeast corner of the feature. An exposed edge of Feature 6 revealed that the limestone block rested upon a foundation of brick, mortar, and concrete. The more robust construction of these features suggests that they likely functioned as roundhouse foundations. Feature 35 (F35) comprises two irregularly-shaped poured concrete slab fragments located within the vicinity of the former roundhouse. The easternmost slab fragment measured approximately 1.45 meters (4.75 feet) east-west by 1 meter (3.28 feet) north-south and 40 centimeters (15.75 inches) thick. The westernmost concrete slab was flush with the ground surface and measured approximately 90 centimeters (35.4 inches) square. Feature 36 (F36) is another roundhouse foundation exhibiting a different construction technique than the previously described features. In this instance, an approximately 20-centimeter-thick “cap” of small limestone fragments cemented together rested upon a lower foundation composed of either additional concrete or bricks encased in mortar. The northern and southern ends of the feature disappeared beneath the soil, and their end points could not be determined. Overall, the exposed portions of the feature measured approximately 89 to 95 centimeters (35 to 37.4 inches) wide and 25 meters (82 feet) long. Two distinct concentrations of railroad ties, identified as Features 9 and 13 (F9, F13), were identified in the project area. Feature 9 comprises a series of three in-situ railroad ties that are flush with the ground surface. The largest tie measures approximately 1.3 meters (4.3 feet) long and 29 centimeters (11.4 inches) wide. The location of these ties corresponds with east-west-running tracks near the southeast corner of the roundhouse as illustrated on the 1891 historical map of the APE. Feature 13 is a pile of railroad ties located in the western half of the project area, many of which are no longer in- situ. Two features were identified in proximity to iron bins included as features in the CAD file provided by the City. Whether these features are associated with historical or modern activities at the site is unclear, however. Feature 10 (F10) comprises an area of blackened, and likely burned, debris that measures approximately 4.1 meters (13.4 feet) east-west and 7.2 meters (23.6 feet) north-south. Approximately 6.7 meters (22 feet) west of Feature 10, a small pile of various metal objects, including sheet metal fragments, bolts, screws, washers, and railroad spikes was observed. Feature 28 (F28) is located approximately 11.3 meters (37 feet) south of Feature 10 and appears to be an area of melted tar or other similar substance that measures approximately 2 meters (6.6 feet) east-west by 1 meter (3.28 feet) north-south. The vegetation in this portion of the project area was low and scrubby, and a greater abundance of coal was visible on the ground surface. F3, Attachment 1 Rev.: 7/1/09 MINNESOTA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM - CONTINUATION SHEET page 6 SITE #: 21RA0070 Site Name: Gladstone Shops Agency/Field #: N/A Feature 11 (F11) is a depression in the location of the site well as depicted on historical maps of the project area. The depression measures approximately 3.1 meters (10.2 feet) east-west by 2.9 meters (9.5 feet) north-south and is approximately 60 centimeters (23.6 inches) deep. In 2001, the well was sealed in accordance with Minnesota regulations in an effort to protect groundwater resources. A small portion of the original well wall as well as modern reinforcing blocks were visible during the survey. Feature 12 (F12) is a small, grassy depression that is approximately 1 meter (3.28 feet) square and 5 centimeters (2 inches) deep situated in the southeast corner of the site. It is unclear whether this feature is associated with a privy formerly located approximately 24.7 meters (81 feet) to the northeast. Several irregularly-shaped asphalt pads (Features 14, 15, 21, 24, 25, and 27) (F14, F15, F21, F24, F25, F27) were noted across the APE. These features ranged in size from 0.25 to 36 square meters (0.82 to 118 square feet) and are likely associated with activities on the property dating to the mid twentieth century. Feature 16 (F16), a partial utility pole, was noted in the southwest corner of the site. The remaining stump measures approximately 1.2 meters (3.9 feet) tall from the ground surface and 24 centimeters (9.4 inches) in diameter. It could not be determined when this pole was installed, and this portion of the site is obscured by tree cover on the 1940 aerial photograph of the project area. Features 17 and 19 (F17, F19) are two square concrete pads identified along the southern edge of the APE. Each pad measures approximately 1.25 meters (4.1 feet) square and contains a slightly recessed center within which up to four 3- centimter (1.2-inch)-diameter bolts are embedded. Feature 17 is flush with the ground surface. Feature 19 has a beveled exterior edge, and is exposed approximately 14 centimeters (5.5 inches) above the ground surface. Feature 18 is a concrete block measuring approximately 2.14 meters (7 feet) long, 61 centimeters wide (24 inches), and 25 centimeters (9.8 inches) high. It also contains a recessed center with bolts and is located approximately 5.5 meters (18 feet) southeast of and 6.5 meters (21.3 feet) southwest of Features 17 and 19, respectively. Although the function of these concrete features is uncertain, they are situated in the vicinity of a series of several small, unidentified structures visible near the southern end of the project area on a 1940 aerial photograph of the APE. In the southeast corner of the project area, a grassy depression (Feature 20, F20) measuring approximately 1 meter (3.28 feet) east-west and 2 meters (6.6 feet) north-south was noted. This feature is in the approximate location of a combination storeroom and office building depicted on the historical maps of the site. It was also noted that in the vicinity of the former storeroom and office building, trees were noticeably absent; this may indicate the presence of additional subsurface features in this portion of the project area. Feature 22 (F22) is a vegetation-filled rectangular depression that measures approximately 4 meters (13.1 feet) north-south by 2 meters (6.6 feet) east-west, and approximately 90 centimeters deep. A concentration of slag was noted in the vicinity of the depression, and, based on its location in comparison with historical maps, may be associated with a former brass foundry. Approximately 4.8 meters southwest of Feature 22, another small depression, Feature 23 (F23), is present. This feature measures approximately 4.5 meters (15.7 feet) east-west by 3.5 meters (11.5 feet) north-south and up to 50 centimeters (19.7 inches) deep and is also in proximity to the former location of a privy located just west of the foundry. Feature 26 (F26) is a metal pipe measuring approximately 28 centimeters (11 inches) in diameter and located in the northwest corner of the APE. This pipe is located immediately west of an access road visible on the 1940 aerial of the project area, and may have functioned as a culvert. A limestone fragment identified as Feature 29 (F29) and measuring approximately 44 centimeters (17.3 inches) east-west by 36 centimeters (14.2 inches) north-south was noted in the vicinity of the erecting shop and turntable as depicted on the 1891 map of the project area. It could not be determined whether this limestone fragment was in-situ or not, but since it appeared to be level with the ground surface, unlike many of the other limestone fragments observed across the site, it was assigned a feature number. Additional limestone fragments not appearing to be in-situ were noted just north of Feature 29. Other cultural materials noted but not collected across the project area included a large piece of sheet metal, decorative glass fragments, window glass fragments, water pipe segments, a horseshoe fragment, numerous yellow brick, limestone, and mortar fragments, and railroad spikes. One of the complete yellow bricks had “Evan & Howard, St. Louis” stamped into it. Along the southeastern edge of the project area, the landscape appeared have been built-up, and a distinct edge to the landform was visible. Additional soil was likely deposited in this portion of the site in advance of track installation. F3, Attachment 1 Rev.: 7/1/09 MINNESOTA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM - CONTINUATION SHEET page 7 SITE #: 21RA0070 Site Name: Gladstone Shops Agency/Field #: N/A In August of 2012, excavation activities related to trail installation in the park unearthed abundant building debris fragments in the vicinity of the railroad roundhouse. An additional site visit was conducted to assess site damage and the impact of the disturbance on overall site integrity. A visual assessment of the site following the aforementioned excavation activities was conducted in September of 2012. During the assessment, it was observed that a 2 to 4 meter (6.6 to 13.2 foot) wide swath had been excavated in the locations of the trail segments across several portions of the site. Immediately west of a trail segment in the northeast corner of the site, four large push piles of building debris, designated A through D, were present. These piles are described in detail below. Disturbance to the remaining portions of the site appeared to be minimal. Push Pile A measured approximately 8 meters (26.2 feet) west-to-east by 4 meters (13.1 feet) north-to-south and approximately one meter (3.3 feet) high and was situated just north of the former turntable. It was primarily comprised of large concrete, brick, and limestone foundation fragments. These fragments bore resemblance to portions of the roundhouse foundation identified during previous fieldwork at the site. Push Pile B measured approximately 7 meters (23 feet) in diameter and one meter (3.3 feet) high and contained mostly soil, with a few small fragments of brick, limestone, and concrete. This pile was situated just northwest of the former turntable. Push Pile C, located near the northeast corner of the former roundhouse, contained a high percentage of limestone fragments exhibiting beveled (finished) edges. Concrete fragments were also abundant in this pile, which measured approximately 7 meters (23 feet) west-to-east by 3 meters (9.8 feet) north-to-south and 0.6 meters (2 feet) high. Push Pile D measured approximately 5 meters (16.4 feet) in diameter and 0.6 meters (2 feet) high. It was situated near the south end of the former roundhouse and contained several large slabs of limestone. Other large limestone slabs tentatively identified as roundhouse foundations were identified in the vicinity of this push pile during previous fieldwork at the site. The contractor noted that the actual depth of the excavation activities had varied across the site depending on soil conditions, and that in some instances the excavation extended several feet below the ground surface. The contractor also stated that no attempt to separate the building debris by material type had been made during its removal; rather the soil and debris had simply been pushed into piles just outside of their general location of origin. The presence of building debris and foundation fragments similar in nature to and in the general locations of the previously identified features associated with the roundhouse suggests that excavation activities likely disturbed portions of the roundhouse foundation, though the actual damage to the foundation appears to have been limited to the trail corridor. Some of the observed debris may have also been derived from activities related to the demolition of the buildings on the property during the 1940s through the 1970s. Based on the limited scope of site disturbance and localized damage to the roundhouse foundation, the integrity of the site does not appear to have been significantly affected. Thirty seven features were identified within the APE during the archaeological monitoring and visual assessment of the site, including intact foundations and depressions. Of these, Features 1 through 9, Feature 11, Feature 13, Features 17 through 19, and Features 29 through 37 are identifiable as foundations or other features associated with the St. Paul and Duluth Railroad Gladstone shops and roundhouse, which were in use prior to 1951. Features 12, 20, 22, and 23 are depressions that are indicative of the presence of subsurface features also likely associated with the Gladstone Shops, as is the sunken area in the vicinity of the former turntable. Additional archaeological investigation at the site, such as shovel testing and/or formal unit excavation, may provide further insight into feature identification, site integrity and development, and the ability of the site to yield important historical information related to railroad districts in Minnesota, including, but not limited to, construction and engineering practices and historic economic and environmental processes. The railroad corridor in which the shops complex is historically significant. If it is determined that the features identified during the survey are associated with the NRHP-eligible St. Paul and Duluth/Northern Pacific railroad corridor historic district during its period of significance, and if they have not been heavily disturbed, they may be recommended as eligible for listing in the NRHP as contributing elements to the railroad corridor historic district and would be recommended as eligible as a railroad maintenance station district for listing in the NRHP under Criterion A. F3, Attachment 1 Rev.: 7/1/09 MINNESOTA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM - CONTINUATION SHEET page 8 SITE #: 21RA0070 Site Name: Gladstone Shops Agency/Field #: N/A If site 21RA0070 includes more than two features whose historical function can be determined, are known to have been owned and operated by the St. Paul and Duluth Railroad, and have not been heavily disturbed, the site may be recommended as eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criterion D for its potential to provide important information under the research theme of landscape history and development. If the subsurface components of the roundhouse where different technologies would have been utilized to complete engine repairs are intact, 21RA0070 would also be recommended as eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criterion D for its potential to provide important information under the research theme of technological change and adaptation, regardless of the significant of the railroad corridor. In addition, if structural remains and artifact deposits associated with the office and/or privies be identified beneath the ground surface, the site would also be recommended as eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criterion D for its potential to provide important information under the research theme of social group identity, behavior, and interaction, regardless of the significance of the railroad corridor. Form Completed By (name and date):Laurie S. H. Ollila, Summit Envirosolutions, Inc., April 1, 2013 MAPS:Attach/include original scale copy of 7.5’ USGS map with site location clearly outlined or designated. Attach a sketch map if surface features present, if sub-surface testing done, or if complicated boundaries/setting. Sketch map must have re-locatable datum, scale, north arrow, and legend if symbols are used. F3, Attachment 1 Map adapted from USGS 7.5 minute topographic map(s): St. Paul East and White Bear Lake West, MN; T 29N, R 22W, Section 16 Site Location 21RA0070 Legend USGS Topo Map Gladstone Shops SiteLocation Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota . Figure X Site Location File: Fig3_1891map Summit Proj. No.: 2161-0001 01,0002,000 Plot Date: 04-01-2013 Feet Arc Operator: SJN 1 inch = 2,000 feet Reviewed by: LSHO F3, Attachment 1 F 32 F30 C F34 35 F 33 F F 31 F3 F2 F4 F5 F1 A B Iron and Bolt Shed Iron and Bolt Shed Privy F22 !\[ 6 F3 F Brass 6 F23 Foundry Repair Tracks F7 F F2627 &3 Sand D 4Bin F2 F21 5 F2 F8 Gas House ? F 9 Iron Bins ? Lumber Pile F10 F11 Lumber Pile F29F28 Pri Wood Shopvy Lumber Shed F37 F12 F13 F15 F1 4 F20 F19 F16 F17 &3 F18 Map adapted from the 1891 map from The Gladstone Shops of the St. Paul and Duluth RR (Schwietz 1977). Site Location 21RA0070 Mfhfoe 1891 Insurance Map Gladstone Shops SiteLocationTreeExcavation Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota !\[ TrailClearingAdditional Structure from CAD . Figure X &3 FeatureLandform Site Location File: Fig3_1891map FeatureDepressed Area Summit Proj. No.: 2161-0001 0120 Plot Date: 04-01-2013 Feature (approx. location) Feet Arc Operator: SJN 1 inch = 133.333333 feet Reviewed by: LSHO Push pile F3, Attachment 1 F 32 F30 C F34 35 F 33 F F 31 F3 F2 F4 F5 F1 A B Iron and Bolt Shed Iron and Bolt Shed Privy F22 !\[ 6 F3 F Brass 6 F23 Foundry Repair Tracks F7 F F2627 &3 Sand D 4Bin F2 F21 5 F2 F8 Gas House ? F 9 Iron Bins ? Lumber Pile F10 F11 Lumber Pile F29F28 Pri Wood Shopvy Lumber Shed F37 F12 F13 F15 F1 4 F20 F19 F16 F17 &3 F18 Map adapted from USDA FSA NAIP Orthophoto, 2010; Ramsey County, Minnesota Site Location 21RA0070 Mfhfoe 2010 Aerial Photograph Gladstone Shops SiteLocationTreeExcavation Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota !\[ TrailClearingAdditional Structure from CAD . Figure X &3 FeatureLandform Site Location File: Fig3_1891map FeatureDepressed Area Summit Proj. No.: 2161-0001 0120 Plot Date: 04-01-2013 Feature (approx. location) Feet Arc Operator: SJN 1 inch = 133.333333 feet Reviewed by: LSHO Push pile