Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.11.1972 Memo RE Norman Undestad Proposal for 2785 WBA Housing Projectl,tapl-exood Huxoan Belatlons Conmt sg lon B e port ilay L].. 1972 To:VllIage Counoll SubJectr Nornan Undestadl proposaL for houslng persona wlth llnited tncoroe at 2?85 Hhlte Bear Av6. The Euman Relatlons Conmlsslon haa asked the. oounolL to adopt q a lesolutlon approvlngt 1;. The deve].opnent of federalLy subsld.lzed. houslng 1n the Vll1age of Maplewood. when the houslng proposals ale ln accord.ance wlth sound.. physlcal and soolal developnent|, orl terta, 2. Partlclpatlon ln the Federal Bent Supplement Progran ln order to nake a portlon of these federal).y subsldized unlta avalIabIe to farnlIles and. 1ndlv1duals of 1ow lncone. The councll asked. us to deflne whqt we neant by i sound physlcal and. soclaL d.evelgpnent clltertai and to ooDEent on the spedlflc proposaL before lt tonlght. He have done thls, but want to roake lt very olea! that. because of the short tlloe avalIable, the crlterla are by no neans exhaustlvo anil nay be tnadequate. As the coaml6bn develops 1ts ldeas on houslng and lts effect upon hunan relatlons these crlterla wlll alwaya be ln the process of d.eveldpnent. Insert Crlterla Statenent In our evaluatlon of the proposed proJect we feel thatt 1. It Is too far fron shopplng and othe! pub1lc and prlvat€ fac11lt1ee. 2. The developnent, especlally the 12 story Blgh Blse and proposed hlgh populatlon denslty 1s not conpatlble wlth the exlstlng area although lt oay be lf the area changes to ootrDerolsl froro resldentlal.. D-- 3.' open apac6 for play or reoreatlon rs not apparent on tho archltectural skatohes.. 4.. Accesslbtllty to pubIlc transpoltatloa le ttlfflcult. J.. Becreatlon spao6 ln the Elgh glse ls avsllabre but not planne{. for use at thls stage of developnent.. 6. Hanageroent of the ooaplex ls cruolal but not yet spelled out. /..An effectlve educatlonal progran to prepare rosldents of th6 oommunlty to absorb pelsons of 10w and nod.erate lncone ls not apparent. 8. rnformatlon ls very sketchy or at least not worked. through ag regard.e several of the orlterla. We felt the proJect net a need for both elderly and low to noderate lncoroe people whlch oould. be a nelghborhood. and vlllage asset.. rt wculd pernlt retlred and o).derIy Maplenood. resldenta to contlnue to llve 1n the v1Llage.. Hlstory has shown that developmentE such as thle d.o not result ln an lnflux of non-res1d.enta. The consensus of the oomulssron was that rt could not support thls proJect on the basls of lnfor'stlon avalrabre at thls tlne. l'Ie are ve"y pleased. that a developer le lnterested ln rooderate lncone houslng. l{e hope that we, the plannlng oorullsslonl the vl1lago staff and other ottlzena groups of MapJ.ewood can work rlth hlru 0o provld,e the houslng at other loostlons.