HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.08.1972MHRC Meeti ng February 8, 1972
Present: C'l evel and Ray (Chairing), Rev Palmitessa, Frances HughesJanet Grant, Kirsten Wold, Janet Kampf, Maria Larsen,
Don Ashworth, Paul LowreyGuest: Lorraine Fischer
Speci a1 Res o u rce Gues t: Bailey Seida
a
Bajley was asked to help clarify the feasibility of the
s ite, the extent of the services and expenses that woul drequired and the application of sections 235 and 236 of
hous i ng code to this site.
prr ory
be
th e
How can so much spadework have been done without prior Councilapproval? (e.9. it is known that the Urban Affairs Commissionof the Archdiocesan Counci I had sent in documents to HUDlaying out the site and stati ng their i ntenti ons for the siteand we have been told th at an "opti on " had bee n s ecured on theacreage).
A. These measures must be taken tofundi ng and mus t be done beforeintell igent1y concei ved pl an to
N0TE: Before proceeding to Bailey,slike you to keep in mi nd that
suppl i ed are subject to manyare, therefore, tenta ti ve and
1ay a proper foundati on for
subm'i ssion of a workab I e andthe Council and the community.
general commentary, we woul dthe figures Bailey has kindlycircumstantial ch anges andflexible!
Sewer: S-ani tary sewer is incapable of handl ing the dischargefrom s uch a devel opment. All collects at McKnight andLarpenteur and then proceeds westerly to l,lhite Bear Avenue.
lYonies for public improvements would have to be reclaimed somehow.
0ne pos i ti ve feature; land can behalf of its rnarket value.
bought from the 0rder for l/3 to
-m0re-
ON SITE:
38 acres of land at Southwest corner of Century and Larpentuer
Avenues.
This is low marginal Iand, a great deal of which is not buildabie.There is no public water; intersection of Larpentuer & McKnightwhich would provide hookup, is about a mile away . public seivi cesare inadequate to service such a development; e.g. we would haveto have a firehouse and additional firemen--more police etc.
a. [,{ho wou]d be assessed the water main or pick up?A. 75% of this cost would be borne by the housing development.General vi 11age cos t woul d be 80%.
2-MHRC 2/8/72
Devel opment envisioned as:
--231 units 90 one/b/r
Projected ea ch unit group at:
Rental Per lt4onth
:E 2/b /r
people
50 3/6/r 36 4/b /r
peopl e117.l38
160
148
I.3
22
4.1
1/b/r2/b/r3/b/r4/b/r
l^Ii th 236
one bedroom
two bedroom
th ree bedroomfour bedroom
May wish to convertacquisition".
sl-60.l90
240
275
$T0-
135-140
150-160
175-180
in time,if the project proceeds,to 235 i"owner
A
A
Cost: Construction cos t mus t not exceed
[,lhat percentage wi I I be desi red for
We have been I ead to bel i eve 25-30%.
Cost of the 231 units total: $3,000,000.
Management cost: $370,000
Land Improvement; $230,000.
Figure total development at abou
does not ta ke i nto cons i derati onbe necessary.
$18,500-$24,500, per unit
rent suppl ement?
I 4-1/2 million dollars.
servi ces or improvments
Th i s
as woul d
If you use the 4-1/2 ni I lion dollar figure to compute
devel opment woul d pay $23.l ,191 of which $?2,600 goes
w'i th remainder to school district, county etc.
taxeto Vi
share of operatingdirect Vi llage
S,
11age
Mon i es and revenues back from s tate, per year, about $ 2 3,000 salestax based on popu) ati on fi g ure; ci garette tax of $1,000; I i quortax of $870; highway user tax of $174--generated total $48,300more or Iess paid to Viiiage directly or rlrid{rectly or $83.96 peryear, per head.
Vi 1l age as a whole paysthe Vi 1 lage; developmenttax, per head.
$6r.07
woul d
per h ead
generate
as their
$22 mo re
-m0re -