Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973 04-19 Maplewood Citizens Defeat Proposed Drainage Project DISPATCH Maplewood Citiz ns D f at . ,, ,fto.: , f ProposedDraina a Pro!ect eutmsft, tC013 Residents of a north Their arguments were • this thing out." it and they can't afford side Maplewood neigh- convincing enough for Councilman John it," he added. "A lot of borhood said last week the village council to Greavu said he was re- elderly people live in they would rather put up vote 5-0 to deny • the luctantly voting against that area. They will with drainage problems_ $273,660 improvement the project. have to move if these as- than pay the cost of a proposal, including con- "Turning it down," he sessments are placed on cure, estimated at $3,082 s t r u.c tion of paved stated, "and just forget- their properties." for a typical 80-foot lot. streets with curbs and ting about the (drainage McCullough also point- They hired attorney gutters and storm sew- problem) doesn't help ed out that 13 of the 14 P a t McCullough, St. ers. the situation." property owners who pe- Paul, to fight the project "If the people were Village engineer Bob- titioned for investigation. proposal in an area split 50-50 I'd vote for by D. Collier, in outlin- of the drainage project bounded roughly by Lar- it," councilman Harald ing the proposal, showed , were opposed to it.pentt e u r Avenue, St. Haugan commented. slides of high water in Paul Water Department "But with 98 per cent the neighborhood due to property, Jackson Ave- opposed," he explained, what he called poor nue and Sylvan Avenue. "I see no reason to drag drainage. But attorney Mc- Cullough said the prob- lems were relatively few and isolated. He said the council should respond to the wishes of the residents. "I've never seen a project in which the peo- ple were so unified in •.their opposition," he re- ported. "I think the reasons are that they don't need