Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973 01-04 Maplewood Approves 4.5% Pay Hike for Employees DISPATCH Maplewood Approves 4. 5 % R. Pay Hikes for Employes, I4 &• { ) 14 73 Across-the-board pay en between the top and "You can't convince under Greavu's proposal hikes of 4.5 per cent for bottom of the pay scales. the guy making $20,000 a the employes at the top Maplewood's adminis- "I don't like this," he year that he can live as "probably w o u 1 d lose t r a t i v e and technical said. cheaply as the guy mak- ground." staff were opposed last M a n a g e r Miller ing $10,000," Olmstead "They'd receive a week by village council- warned that with Grea- replied. smaller percentage in- man John Greavu. vu's approach, the vil- Councilman H a r a I d crease than the (rise in) But the rest of the vil- lage would lose "top peo- Haugan suggested that cost of living," he corn- lage c o u n c i l followed ple." mented. V i l l a g e Manager Mi- "T h e y (Maplewood Mayor Les A x d a h l c h a e 1 Miller's recom- employes) are going to said Greavu 's plan mendation. The council start looking around for would "get us back into approved the increases some other place to go," a corner." 4-1. he said. "I am firmly opposed "I think the percen- The co u n c i 1 also to (identical) p e r c e n- tage increase is inequit- o k a y e d pay increases tage increases, particu- able." councilman Don that range from 4.2 to 4.5 larly right now when Olmstead told Greavu. per cent for public this (wage) freeze is "But what you (pro- works department oper- on,"Greavu announced. pose) is even more in- ating personnel. Instead, he suggested equitable," he added. "If This time G r e a v u that each employe, re- you give a $300 raise to joined with the rest of gardless of his current every e m p 1 o y e, that the council to make the wage, should get the doesn't a c h i e v e any vote unanimous, same dollar-amount' greater equity." The council delayed raise. G r e a v u said that action, at Miller's urg- He proposed no specif- across-the-board dollar ing, on police depart- ic amount. increases would be fair ment salaries. With identical across- because commodities The manager said he the-board percentage in- cost the same for the may submit a recom- creases year after year, employes at the top or mendation at a council the councilman argued, the bottom of the pay meeting tonight. the gap continues to wid- scale.