HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972 07-12 Council rescinds occupancy permit for J&W Boats REVIEW CZ Cl.) ,,._;ta)w V IV
: y O N _ y o .' O C
co
o o o a :Y
a.� �' a c a o c al III a, c o
O c0
V C � Z � �� 05 t.--
a wow F2 =
so. E ,C �� 0a a� .,ri0
C VI
Q) p G C ca`) C U .= 514
4111
a 2 ) ca y v� U p.� U
`ati- °� cy a c o 3
13 L., (1) a).--, o-0
o
13
o a)
ca i00 V
Ct'� C
0 U C. -+ m Cca rpO CO al
al.
J bQ D
U OU 0'
Ms.
o
lra 'F.'s E
Vcn �1111 .0
ccs CZ 4-1
� 7-1 � o
a *aa yam =
~ � 8. C6
0 •
...cn
booms x c y s.
�... S. o c. p
o
C . uca
u c. Q-- o ca 0 a)
LV p
oNaIIA
ald y . ma
aC3Cc � _ c.
y , oc
c
MU E
f-S.,O p o
a)o cn O
U'� Ca 2 O V ca.�
C n
... ca O 3 a)b ca ,,,,c„..g
.0 s, E'er G c0....
Ts a)u a3 us .-'c ca 3
0 MEI c.
as
V ` _
"7 w M V
„ O w c6'C3 U
G ca w
mo 0
p p V1
e .4.
�
O
ca)"O p 0
.-. ca
x •C)o a • �
. .Y •
Vvto. O ox w
bA 'Zt Z .0 :i
a) a)
C > G . (y 2 0 cn ca rU.UI
6 ca a) p — O
U p .'' fl c'Et cam O O d
— m w , .� YO
O� w � as C
16? E .4..J 0..) t.., S.,
= (3) ..tn,7:i 7,11 S., cn.0 -0
.--. O G
C 0-0 ct ''CI w y
c4 � .0., '� Ll. U 0 C 0
• o ca cn
LE up
2.0._.4_ ¢g . o sem. o as.2
al co
0 " ❑ vC V 0 o
3
-�Focaa�vH C O yy.
cca4O �,� O U v)
U
al
oo ,go 00
ppb C O �.p V
Q'�CitgU wp O d 7 O
j--
G4 ca O- o i. F-, OU O
n "n m F. 8 a) ,., Q
But a village inspection on October 21, there amthe e
1971 revealed non-satisfactory com and theis debris wind blows itround arounditost theof neightim_
pliance. Agan an extension was given;
this time until November 11, 1971 but
another village inspection showed on 2) " occasion
results.
down thereOn workingyat mcan idnighthearand 1
a. em
in the morning moving boats in the
The third and final extension was street from one driveway to with
granted until July 1,1972.During the past a small tractor,and at night also uses the
winter months the Council asked for the street to move boats without lights
another on the
filing of a $2,500 Performance bond, but boats or vehicles used to move the boats."
waived the bond after J & W showed an
inability to provide or acquire one. One citizen told the council, "We're not
out here to deny anyone their business but
Non-compliance
on lottandscreeconditionsning
of
I don't think this thing was investigated."
landscaping,
parkingg
were found on the last inspection, July 3. GRIFFIN RESPONDED
charges. to the
SOME CITIZENS at the meeting felt
that the original building permit should "Until the state gives us full authority
not have been granted. And they have we can't go ahead and fix up the land-
more to say too. scaping," he said. The boulevard land.
scaping came under the jurisdiction of
In their letter they wrote, "The 'No State Highway Department R.O.W.whict
Parking' sign in front of the building in this case required a lease in order tc
periodically disappears (June 14-the last landscape.
time). The parking of cars and boats in
his lower driveway are right out to the
blacktop of the road,making it difficult to
see around the corner, creating a hazard
if meeting oncoming vehicles."
And they added: Griffin said he had been assured a lease
would be forthcoming in a matter of time.
1) "He has a rubbish container but
(Continued on Page 7) On the matter of fencing Griffin
claimed strikes had halted his plans to
build a retaining fence. Again he argued
innocence.
"No one foresee's a strike,"he said.But
one citizen countered, "He didn't make
any attempts to put up a fence until last
Friday (July 7).
And concerning the parking lot Griffin
said he had blacktopping completely
finished except for state right of ways.
HOWEVER, the Council remained
unconvinced. After voting to rescind the
occupancy permit they directed the
matter to the village attorney. .. .H