Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-08-16 CDRB Packet AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Tuesday, August 16, 2016 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers - Maplewood City Hall 1830 County Road B East 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes: a. August 3, 2016 5. Design Review: a. Consider Approval of Design Plans for a Proposed Indoor Storage Building, Northeast Corner of English Street North and Cope Avenue East 6. New Business: 7. Visitor Presentations: 8. Board Presentations: 9. Staff Presentations: 10. Adjourn MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, JULY 26, 2016 MEETING WAS RESCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 3, 2016 5:00 p.m. 1.CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Kempecalled the meeting to order at5:01p.m. 2.ROLL CALL Chairperson, Bill KempePresent Boardmember,Jason LamersPresent Vice Chairperson,Matt LedvinaPresent Boardmember,Ananth ShankarPresent Staff Present:Michael Martin, Economic Development Coordinator 3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA BoardmemberLedvinamoved to approve the agenda as approved. Seconded by BoardmemberLamers.Ayes -All The motion passed. 4.APPROVAL OF MINUTES BoardmemberLamers moved to approve the May 24, 2016,CDRB minutes as submitted. Seconded by BoardmemberLedvina.Ayes –Chairperson Kempe, Boardmember’s Lamers & Ledvina Abstention–Boardmember Shankar The motion passed. 5.DESIGN REVIEW a.Consider Approval of Design Plans, Hill-Murray, 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East i.Economic Development Coordinator, Mike Martin gave the report on the approval of design plans for Hill Murray, 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East and answered questions of the board. ii.Benjamin Foreman, RJM Construction, 701 Washington Avenue North, Suite600, Minneapolis, addressed and answered questions of the board. iii.Tom Betti, Architect, 292 Design Group, 3533 Lake Street, Minneapolis, addressed and answered questions of the board. August 3, 2016 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 1 Boardmember Lamersmoved to approvethe project plans date-stamped July 15, 2016, for the new plaza,restroom building and storage building at Hill Murray School at 2625 Larpenteur Avenue. The city bases this approval on the findings required by the code. The developer or contractor shall do the following: 1.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2.Complete the following before the city issues a grading or building permit: a.Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage,erosion control, tree and sidewalk plans. The plans shall meet all the conditions and changes noted in Jon Jarosch’s memo dated July 15, 2016. b.Provide the city with a letter of credit or cash escrow for all required landscaping improvements. The amountshall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. 3.Complete the following before occupying the new buildings: a.Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction. b.Restore and sod damaged turf areas. c.Complete all landscaping for the project. d.Install and maintain all required trees and landscaping and an in-ground sprinkler system for all landscaped areas (code requirement). 4.If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a.The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b.The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the city for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished landscaping by June 1 of the next year if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. 5.The future concession building project requires design review and approval by the city. 6.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of the environmental and economic development department may approve minor changes. Seconded by Boardmember Ledvina.Ayes –All The motion passed. b.Consider Approval of Design Plans and a Comprehensive Sign Plan Amendment, ALDI, 3000 White Bear Avenue North i.Economic Development Coordinator, Mike Martin gave the report on the design plans and a comprehensive sign plan amendment for ALDI, 3000 White Bear Avenue North and answered questions of the board. August 3, 2016 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 2 ii.Ryan Anderson, ISG, 7900 International Drive, Suite550, Minneapolis,addressed and answered questions of the board. Boardmember Ledvinamoved to approvethe plans date-stamped July 15, 2016 for the building remodeling and July 26, 2016 for the landscaping planfor the proposed ALDI at the Plaza 3000 Shopping Center, 3000 White Bear Avenue. Approval is subject to the following conditions: (additions are in bold and underlined and deletions are cross out): 1.Approval of design plans is good for two years. If the applicant has not begun construction within two years, this design review shall be repeated. 2.The property owner shall submit a plan to staff for approval that proposes trash enclosures behind the building on the south and east sides to contain all trash and recycling dumpsters. This is a code requirement. ALDI’s trash and recycling dumpsters are required to be screened. 3.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the fire marshal and building official. All building code requirements relative to the proposed building project and revisions shall be subject to the building official’s approval. 4.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the engineering department’s review dated July 8, 2016. 5.The applicant shall stripe parking spaces in the parking lot west of the building with 10-foot- wide spaces. 6.There shall be no use, other than parking, of the area northwest of ALDI previously used for outdoor seasonal sales, for pumpkins and Christmas trees, for example, without the property owner first obtaining aparking waiver from the city council. 7.The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for staff approval showing landscaping elements added to the area between White Bear Avenue and the parking lot and the addition of parking lot islands which include landscaping.Theapplicant shall evaluate the use of trees or other vegetation subject to staff approval and shall evaluate the landscapingin the parking islands indicated on the July 26, 2016 plan. Boardmember Ledvinamoved to approve changes to the comprehensive sign plan for the Plaza 3000 to facilitate the requested signage for ALDI. The amended criteria shall read (additions are underlined and deletions are cross out): 1.Tenant signs are restricted to store identity only. 2.The approved signage area on the Plaza 3000 south building is the upper building fascia. The signage shall consist of a continuous 36-inch high individual-letter signs mounted on a raceway as shown on the remodeling plans date-stamped March 25, 1998. At the center of the mall area, a second row of signs may be used to help locate tenants. There shall be a minimum of 18 inches between signs. Based on the plans date-stamped July 15, 2016, ALDI is approved to have signage on the north and west elevations which include individual channel letters which do not exceed a height of 24 inches and one logo on each elevation that does not exceed 9 feet and 5.5 inches in height. August 3, 2016 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 3 3.The approved signage area on the Plaza 3000 North Annex is the upper building fascia. The maximum letter height allowed is 36 inches. The total sign height for more than one line of copy shall not exceed four feet. These signs shall be individual, internally-lit letters mounted on raceways. There must be at least two feet between both ends of a tenant’s sign and that tenant’s store front. These signs must be centered horizontally and vertically within the upper building fascia. 4.Staff may approve signage changes for the major tenants, provided the signs meet the code and are smaller or similar in size to the signs they are replacing. 5.As approved by the city council on October 9, 1995 the sign criteria for pylon signs shall be as follows: The original Plaza 3000 pedestal sign and the 6 by 12 foot pylon sign shall be removed. The proposedexisting11 by 20 foot pylon as shown on the plan date stamped August 18, 1995is subject to meeting the city code requirements. The existing Plaza 3000 North Annex pylon sign may remain. If the shopping center owner does not install the proposed pylon sign, there shall be no pylon sign changes, except removal, without city approval. 6.Service door signs are limited to the store name and address. Addresses must be between 3 and 12 inches in height. Store names must not exceed three inches in height. 7.All holes from signs that are removed must be properly patched and the wall raceway or fascia must be repainted or refinished. 8.The community design review board must review major changes to this criteria. Staff may approve copy changes for the signs and minor pylon sign revisions if they meet code. Seconded by Boardmember Shankar.Ayes –All The motion passed. c.Consider Approval of Design Plans, Koob Moo Spiritual Center, 1205 Gervais Avenue East i.Economic Development Coordinator, Mike Martin gave the report on the design plans for Koob Moo Spiritual Center, 1205 Gervais Avenue East. ii.Russ Karasch, Owner, Keystone Design Building, representing Koob Moo Spiritual Center, addressed and answered questions of the board. The board agreed to amend the conditions stating vinyl siding shall not be used and the applicant shall use James Hardie board siding and no EIFS shall be used as a secondary finish on the exterior. Boardmember Lamersmoved to approvethe plans date-stamped July 15, 2016,August 3, 2016, for the proposed building, site and landscaping plans for 1205 Gervais Avenue North. Approval is subject to the following conditions:(additions are in bold and underlined and deletions are cross out): 1.Approval of design plans is good for two years. If the applicant has not begun construction within two years, this design review shall be repeated. Staff may approve minor changes to these plans. August 3, 2016 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 4 2.The applicant shall comply with the conditions noted in the engineering report by Jon Jarosch dated July 14, 2016. 3.The applicant shall submit to staff for approval design plans for the trash enclosure. The trash enclosure must be large enough for both the trash and recycling containers. 4.The applicant shall submit to staff for approval a revised landscaping plan showing at least three species of trees to be planted on site and a detailed planting plan for the ponding area. 5.The applicant shall submit to staff for approval revised building elevations incorporating brick or stone on the front elevation, wrapping to the sides of the building and adding architectural elements to the lap sidingand roof area of the front elevation.The applicant shall use JamesHardie board siding in place of vinyl siding and EIFS shall not be used as a secondary finishon the exterior. 6.If a parking shortage develops, the applicant shall be required to execute parking agreements with neighboring properties to serve as overflow lots. 7.The applicant shall provide an irrevocable letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of 150 percent of the cost of installing the landscaping, before getting a building permit. Seconded by Boardmember Ledvina.Ayes –All The motion passed. 6.NEW BUSINESS a.Consider Amendments to the CDRB’s Rules of Procedure i.Economic Development Coordinator, Mike Martin gave the report on the Rulesof Procedure. Boardmember Ledvinamoved to approvethe CDRB shall meet once a month on the third Tuesday of themonthat 6 p.m. Seconded by Chairperson Kempe.Ayes –All The motion passed. This item will be going to the city council August 22, 2016. 7.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. 8.BOARDPRESENTATIONS None. August 3, 2016 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 5 9.STAFF PRESENTATIONS None. 10.ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Chairperson Kempeat6:11p.m. August 3, 2016 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 6 MEMORANDUM TO:Melinda Coleman, City Manager FROM:Michael Martin, AICP, Economic Development Coordinator DATE:August 10, 2016 SUBJECT:ConsiderApproval of Design Plans for a Proposed Indoor Storage Building, Northeast Corner of English Street North and Cope Avenue East Introduction Project Description JJ Jenkins,of NorthPoint Development,is requestingapproval to build a 108,150-square-foot indoor, self-storage facility on the vacant lot on the northeast corner of Cope Avenue Eastand English Street North, east of the Holiday store and west of MG McGrath Inc.The applicant requirescity council approval for a conditional use permit(CUP)and design reviewin order to move forward with the project. Discussion Conditional UsePermit Conditional Use Permit Revision Proximity to Residential Districts City code requires a CUP for interior storage facilities and anystructure in a light manufacturing (M1) zoning district within 350 feet of a residential lot. In this instance, the proposed building would be approximately 260 feet from the nearest residential property line. The lot where the proposed building would be built has a lower elevation than the homes to the south and the applicant would leave much of the existing berm along Cope Avenue in place providing sufficient screening. CUP Findings for Approval The zoning ordinance requires that the city council find that all nine “standards” for CUP approval be met to allow a CUP. In short, these state that the use would (refer to the resolution for the complete wording): Comply with the city’s comprehensive plan and zoning code. Maintain the existing or planned character of the neighborhood. Not depreciate property values. Not cause any disturbance or nuisance. Not cause excessive traffic. Be served by adequate public facilities and police/fire protection. Not create excessive additional costs for public services. Maximize and preserve the site’s natural and scenic features. Not cause adverse environmental effects. The proposal would meet these CUP conditions with the proposed screening methods. English Street and Cope Avenue are designed to handle the traffic that would be expected by this use. Design Review Architectural The proposed self-storage facility will consist of three stories at approximately 36,050 square feetper floor. There will be1,200square feetof office spaceon the southeast corner of the first floor. Both the officecorner and the corner closest to Highway 36 will be highlighted with brick andglass. The balance of the building will have prefinished metal with variations in color and profile. Thelighter trim and darker corrugated accents will provide variation along the elevations. Occasional windows will also provide variation. Userswill utilize an internal drive-thru to pick up anddrop off their storage materials. The glass entry door is located on the east sideof the buildingand the exit door is located on the southside. Staff recommends additional elements be added to the elevations –particularly the west elevation. This could include adding additional windows or brick elements. While the site is at a lower elevation and much of the building will be screened, portions of the west and north elevations will be visible from English Street and Highway 36 and need to have enhanced elevations. Site Design and Setbacks The proposed building setbacks meet city ordinance requirements. The building will be setback approximately 45 feet from English Street and 210 feet from Cope Avenue –well beyond the minimum requirements. Parking lots are required to be setback at least 15 feet from front property lines and the proposed parking areas with this project are also well beyond this minimum. The site will be accessed from a single drive off of Cope Avenue on the east side of the site. Users will pull in and park inside the building to access their storage spaces. Parking The site plan shows the inclusion of seven parking spaces. The office space area of the building will be 1,200 square feet. For office space, the city requires one parking space for every 200 square feet.Meaning, this development requires six spaces and is providing seven. Other storage facilities in the city have not been required to provide for parking for the square footage dedicated to storage. Acorn Storage –located at 2457 Maplewood Drive North –was required to provide seven parking spaces just for its office space. U-Haul Self Storage –located at 1195 Viking Drive East –was required to originally provide four parking spaces but in 2012 added two more for a total of six parking spaces. In addition to the seven spaces outside, there will be room for at least eight cars to be parked inside of the facility. Sidewalks There are existing sidewalk segments in place to the east and west of this proposed development. The applicant will be required to put in a sidewalk along Cope Avenue. Landscaping The applicant is not proposing to remove any significant trees and will be planting 31 new trees on site. The applicant is working to keep the site conditions along Cope Avenue and English Street as untouched as possible to provide screening between the new facility and the neighboring properties. Department Comments Engineering Please see Jon Jarosch’s engineering report, dated August 8, 2016, attached to this report. Building Official, Nick Carver Applicant must meet all Minnesota State Building Code requirements. Fire Department, Fire Marshall Butch Gervais Fire protection and alarm monitoring will be required, there will need to be fire department standpipes inside and a fire department lockbox. All work must be done by licensedcontractors and permits must be applied for and obtained. Police Department, Chief Paul Schnell No issues Commission Review August 16, 2016: The planning commission will review this project at its meeting. August 16, 2016: The community design review board will review this project at its meeting. Budget Impact None. Recommendations A.Adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permit for an indoor storage building to be located at the northeast corner of English Street North and Cope Avenue East. This CUP allows the building to be constructed closer than 350 feetto a residential district. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1.Adherence tothesubmitted plans dated August 5, 2016. Staff may approve minor changes. 2.Thelandscape plan shall berevised forstaff’s approvalshowing: a.Size, species, and location of all significant trees on the property; location of trees protected and measures for protection. 3.Outdoor storage and sales are not allowed anywhere on site. 4.Any rooftop equipment installed on the building must be screened from the residential properties to the south. 5.If parking shortages develop, applicant will be required to install additional parking spaces. 6.The proposed use must be substantially startedwithin one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 7.The city council shall review this permit in one year. B.Approve the plans date-stamped August 5, 2016, for the indoor storage building to be located at the northeast corner of English Street North and Cope Avenue East. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: 1.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2.Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant must submit to staff for approval the following items: a.A revised landscaping plan showing the size, species, and location of all significant trees on the property; location of trees protected and measures for protection. b.Revised building plansshowing additional design elements added to the west and north elevations c.A revised photometric plan which meets all city lighting requirements. d.An irrevocable letter of credit or cash escrow for all required landscaping. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. The city shall hold this escrow until it has been shown that the landscaping has survived one full growing season. 3.Signage on the property is not part of the design review approval. The applicant shall apply for sign permits to be reviewed by staff. 4.Comply with all requirements of the engineering report dated August 8, 2016. 5.All work shall follow the approved plansand these conditions.Staff may approve minor changes. Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the 48 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site for their opinion about this proposal. Of the threereplies, one wasin favorone was opposed and one have comments. In Favor 1.We are excited to have such quality developers on this lot. This is a great fit for the site and a wonderful improvement to the area. This will add a very quality service for Maplewood’s residents. (Linn Investment Properties, 1789 Woodland Drive, Woodbury, MN –current owner of the subject property and the Holiday Store to the west) Opposed 1.I have lived in Maplewood a long time and lately it seems like everything being built is “low- income housing” or some other form of multi-housing. As a first-ring suburb I think better use of property at Cope and English could be developed. Storage will add to the tax base but do little else to improve the community. A strip mall with various shops or an office building would be better use of the land. I would like to see the city have its own ice arena like Roseville, White Bear Lake and Woodbury have. (Kevin and Diane Halweg, 2234 McAfee Circle North) Comments 1.As executer for the estate of Roger A Franz, I do want to comment –but on the Holiday Station, which was pushed through by the city council as a 24-hour operation, against the wishes of the neighbors. I have been trying to sell the house at 1282 Cope Court since May. Every negative comment has been regarding the Holiday Station at its 24-hour status. The price of the house has been reduced several times (house is in perfect condition). Now the price is $10,000 below the Zillow “zestimate” of its value. Still no interest. When the neighborhood begged to require the applicant for the gas station to close at midnight, Holiday called the city council’s bluff. The city council caved to the station owner,with absolutely no regard for the longtime residents of the neighborhood, who had been paying taxes for 50 years. To think that in the current real estate market it is impossible to sell this three bedroom, two bath ranch style house on a cul-de-sac, hardwood floors, all appliances, fenced-in backyard and even a riding lawn mower. Truth is, nobody wants to live a few thousand feet away from a 24 hour gas station no matter what the price. The project was approved with minimal berming and minimal screening. The facility is brightly lighted, with a high placed lighted sign –24-hours a day. Apparently, being a loyal resident paying property taxes for 50 years means nothing to the Maplewood City Council when Holiday comes to town. I am almost glad Roger Franz is not here to witness the fiasco regarding trying to sell his house. He would be angry all over again. (Carole MacCarter, 1282 Cope Court) Reference Information Site Description Site Size:3.2Acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Land Surrounding LandUses North: Highway 36 South: Cope Avenue East and single family homes East:MG McGrath Inc West:English Street North and Holiday Store Planning Existing Land Use:Commercial (C) Existing Zoning:Light Manufacturing(M1) Application Date The city deemed the applicant’sapplications complete on August5,2016. The initial 60-day review deadline for a decision wasOctober 4, 2016. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99, the city is allowed to take an additional 60 days if necessary inorder to complete the review of the application. Criteria for Approvals Findings for CUP Approval Section 44-1097(a) requires that the city council base approval of a CUP on nine findings. Refer to the findings for approval in the resolution. Design Review Section 2-290 of the city code requires that the community design review board make the following findings to approve plans: 1.That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments, and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that itwill not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2.That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3.That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of goodcomposition, materials, textures and colors. Attachments 1.Location Map 2.Land Use Map 3.Zoning Map 4.Applicant’s Narrative and Background 5.Proposed Site Plan 6.Proposed Landscape Plan 7.Proposed Building Elevations 8.Jon Jarosch, Engineering comments, dated August 8,2016 9.Conditional Use Permit Resolution 10.Applicant’sPlan Set (separate attachment) Attachment 1 Maplewood Heights Kohlman Lake Hazelwood Sherwood Glen Parkside Western Hills Gladstone Hillside Beaver Lake Battle Creek Vista Hills Highwood Carver Ridge Maplewood, City of Maplewood Maplewood, City of Maplewood, Source: Esri, NE Corner of Cope Avenue East and English Street North - DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Beyond Self Storage Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © Conditional Use Permit and Design Review - Overview Map OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Attachment 2 Maplewood, City of Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Legend Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, NE Corner of Cope Avenue East and Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and Commercial English Street North - Beyond Self Storage the GIS user community Low Density Residential Conditional Use Permit and Design Review - Land Use Map Government Attachment 3 Maplewood, City of Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Legend Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, NE Corner of Cope Avenue East and Light Manufacturing (m1) Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and English Street North - Beyond Self Storage the GIS user community Single Dwelling (r1) Double Dwelling (r2) Conditional Use Permit and Design Review - Zoning Map Planned Unit Development (pud) Attachment 4 2550 University Avenue W. Suite 238N St. Paul, MN 55114 To:Michael Martin City of Maplewood From:JJ Jenkins NorthPoint Development Trisha Sieh, P.E. Kimley-Horn th Date:July 26, 2016 Subject:Proposed Development Beyond Self Storage at Maplewood Southeast corner Hwy 36 and English Street Maplewood, MN INTRODUCTION NorthPoint Development seeks to build a high quality self-storage facility in the City of Maplewood, MN. Operated as Beyond Self Storage, NorthPoint Development focuses on Class A self-storage facilities in strong urban and suburban markets at prime locations with good drive-by traffic and great visibility. Our properties will boast outstanding professionals who have excellent management skills including sales, customer service, and marketing. This 100% climate-controlled enclosed self-storage facility, approximately 108,150 SF within 3 stories, will have modern amenities including self service automation, a drive-in feature for loading and unloading within the building, a conference center for the tenants’ to utilize for convenience, and the latest access control and security features to protect the facility and our tenant’s possessions. Example pictures, to provide context into the character of the building NorthPoint is proposing, are at the end of this letter for your review. SITE AND BUILDING ORIENTATION The current zoning of the Site is Light Manufacturing (m1) and while the proposed use of the property as self-storage fits within the character of the zoning district, a Conditional Use Permit is required for interior storage. The surrounding properties consist of light manufacturing to the east, Cope Avenue and residential to the south, English Street and the Holiday Stationstore to the west and Highway 36 to the north. There is currently 32 feet of fall across the site, with the footprint of the building sitting in the low spot approximately 60 horizontal feet from the northern property line and 210 horizontal feet from the southern property line. The 3-story building is approximately 39’ high to the parapet line and 44’ in total height to the top of the feature wall line. A natural berm currently exists on the south side of the property, ranging up to 10’ higher than the elevation of Cope Avenue. The berm will remain, and be enhanced with additional landscaping to provide screening from the residences on the south side of Cope Avenue. Between the southern berm and the building, an infiltration area for stormwater treatment and attenuation, the parking stalls, and mechanical pad area will be constructed. In lieu of the mechanical units being on the rooftop, and potentially viewed from the adjacent higher streets, the mechanical units will be constructed at grade and screened with landscape material. BUILDING DESIGN This self-storage facility will consist of three stories at approximately 36,050 SF per floor. There will be approximately 1,200 SF of office and amenities on the southeast corner of the first floor. Both the office corner (southeast) and the corner closest to Highway 36 (northeast) will be highlighted with brick and glass. The balance of the building will have prefinished metal with variations in color and profile. The lighter trim and darker corrugated accents will provide relief and variations along the elevations. Occasional windows will also provide variation. Clients will utilize an internal drive-thru to pick up and drop off their belongings. The drive-thru glass entry door is located on the east side and the drive-thru exit door is located on the south. 1 Attachment 4 PARKING Seven exterior parking stalls are proposed for staff members and customers. At 1,200 SF of office, six parking stalls are required by City Code. Additionally, up to eight vehicles can park along the interior drive-thru aisle, while still allowing thru access for other vehicles, to adequately serve the individual storage units. The parking area and building exterior will be adequately lit for safety and in accordance with the City’s guidelines. SUMMARY The proposed self-storage facility will fit nicely into the community by establishing a quality building on a vacant site, consistent with the zoning district guidance, while maintaining a low intensity use to be harmonious with the adjacent residential. The Site and Architectural design meets the City of Maplewood District Regulations, thus no variances or deviations are requested. A Conditional Use Permit for interior self-storage and consideration by the Community Design Review Board are respectfully requested. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at (651) 643-0470, or by email at trisha.sieh@kimley-horn.com Modern Buildings 100% Climate Control 2 Attachment 4 High-Tech Security Systems Access ControlledSecurity Cameras w/Intercom System FacilitiesDVR Convenient Amenities Business Center W/Moving Supplies and Drive-Thru Free WiFiServices Loading/Unloading 3 Attachment 4 CORPORATE PROFILE beyond the contract Attachment 4 WHO WE ARE NorthPoint Development is a Kansas City based real estate development, management employees are highly motivated, we share 25% Attachment 4 PUT PEOPLE FIRST The relationships with our customers, employees, LIVE GENEROUSLY and investors are our most valuable assets. We We believe we have an obligation to give back will strive to always take care of each other and to the community through charitable efforts and, to operate our business so that we maintain our as a token of our appreciation to those who have culture of appreciation, respect, transparency, and helped us succeed, we will pay it forward. CORE MAINTAIN OUR TAKE OWNERSHIP OF FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE EVERY SITUATION VALUES We will approach every deal with Every individual shall take ownership, an appropriate margin of safety and be accountable, and take responsibility while avoiding blame, excuses, and never stretching for a deal or becoming denial. We will always strive to admit, greedy. learn, and grow from failure and mistakes. DO THE RIGHT THING EVERY TIME As we conduct our business, we will operate with the highest integrity and we shall strive to live by the Golden Rule. JUST A FEW OF THE MANY CHARITIES WE SUPPORT DOING RIGHT FOR OUR COMMUNITY We will help support our employees’ charitable endeavors by matching 100% of the charitable donations that all of our employees make. This allows the charity of our organization employees. We will make the goal of helping people who are less fortunate to be a part of the fabric of our company; it will be an active goal of our company to seek out and help others. We want to look back over our careers and be proud of the good that we have done. TOTAL CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS // OVER $1,325,000 Attachment 4 (when asked to name the main reason for NorthPoint’s success) 2015 1st Place Winners in Medium Sized Company - Kansas City Business Journal’s Best Place to Work Attachment 4 OUR TEAM Jenna Patterson Nathaniel HagedornGrant Barnes Multi-family Asset Manager CEOProject Manager Tiffany Harris Rob AlumbaughJJ Jenkins Multi-family Area Manager PartnerProject Manager Jennifer Edwards Chad MeyerAaron Burks Lease Administrator President / COOProject Manager Amber Claxton Larry LapinskiKristen Johnson Operations Specialist - Multi-family VP of DevelopmentProject Administrator Renee Halterman Brent Miles Amy Smith VP of Economic DevelopmentProject Administrator Heather Pfender Patrick RobinsonSuzanne Leach Executive Assistant VP of DevelopmentProject Administrator Ann Erdmann Robert Gude, CCIM Paula Sage Administrative Assistant VP of DevelopmentProject Administrator Philecia Markovich Mark PomerenkeBrett Grady, Administrative Assistant VP of Operations Ramona Suter John ThomasTammy Tappana VP of DevelopmentAccounting Manager Marissa Denton Johan HenriksenDavey Krause Creative Director VP of DevelopmentController Jake Adams Robb Waters, Jeremy Davis Graphic Design & Marketing Specialist Director of ArchitectureProject Accountant Sarah Rogers Sarah MiklichBrett Brase Graphic Design & Marketing Specialist VP of Senior Living OperationsProject Accountant Chris Reeves Ian McDonaldTaylor Jessup Administrative Assistant / Marketing General Counsel / Project ManagerProperty Accountant Darin Glaze John BeasleyMelissa Fry Director of Facilities Director of LogisticsProperty Accountant Jesse Perez Brad HaymondMelanie Glidewell Building Engineer Project ManagerdAccounting Associate Jeremy Jones R.J. AgeeBrian Votava, CCIM Building Engineer Project ManagerSupervising Broker Benjamin Hagedorn Eric WattsJayme Miller Self-Storage Operations Manager Project ManagerLeasing Associate Brett PowellKelly Clark Project ManagerDirector of Property Management Ron Schauwecker Greg Norris Project ManagerCommercial Property Management Jed MomotLonnie Garrett CPM Project ManagerCommercial Property Management Adam FrankenbergCara Northup Project ManagerAssistant Commercial Property Manager Attachment 4 KEY PRINCIPALS Chad Meyer Founder / CEOPresident / COOVP of Development VP of Development With 14 years of commercial With 18 years of industrial John has over 18 years During his 15-year career, real estate experience, Nathaniel engineering and construction of engineering, design & Patrick has been involved is responsible for the overall experience, Chad is responsible construction experience. His in the development and strategy of the company and is for the general oversight primary responsibility relates to planning of over 2,700 acres principally focused on guiding & growth of development, the infreastructure and industrial of commercial and residential development, leasing and building development and projects throughout the United management activities for the and Design Build industrial construction at Logistics Park States, with a primary focus on construction for NorthPoint Kansas City. John also supports the Kansas City Metropolitan Development projects NorthPoint’s industrial space area. Over the past eight Nathaniel has raised over nationwide. Currently, redevelopment team. years, Patrick has had direct $1,400,000,000 in capital in the NorthPoint has over 20,100,000 responsibility for some of the last three years for our various SF of industrial projects Prior to joining NorthPoint largest residential and industrial real estate projects and has completed, and is on track Development, John served as developments in Kansas City. emerged as one of Kansas to double industrial deliveries the Kansas City area Operations In his current role, Patrick City’s most active commercial nationally in the next twenty four Manager for Terracon is focused on identifying, real estate developers. Our months. Consultants.v evaluating, and executing new real estate development excess of 20,100,000 sq. ft. Prior to joining NorthPoint opportunities. of commercial space and over Development, Chad served as 2,000 apartments. the Regional Director of ARCO National Construction and an Industrial Systems Engineer at GE. Attachment 4 KEY PRINCIPALS Kelly Clark Director of Property Management VP of Economic DevelopmentVP of DevelopmentDirector of Architecture As Director of Property With 14 years of economic With 30 years in real estate Robb brings over 20 years of Management, Kelly is responsible development experience, Brent construction, brokerage and experience in the design and for overseeing the property is responsible for development development, Bob is responsible management of a wide variety management operations for a prospects, incentive offers and for the site development and of project types. His unique portfolio of over 2,000 apartment approvals, and governmental project management of new balance of design, technical units and 8 million square feet relations. Brent’s day to day warehouse construction. and administrative skills has of commercial space. Kelly has tasks include contracts for Current projects are located contributed to many successful over 15 years of successful incentives, real estate and land at Logistics Park Kansas projects in the industrial, property management and development negotiations, City, Columbus, Ohio and manufacturing and cold storage business development experience Indianapolis.divisions. He is NCARB including an extensive background structures. In addition to his role in portfolio management at NorthPoint Development, reciprocal registration allowing and property operations. Brent is President of NorthPoint design and oversight in most US Kelly’s expertise includes Incentive Consultants (NPIC) and Canadian jurisdictions. new construction, lease-ups, which assists businesses with acquisitions, renovations and Federal, State, Local, and Utility dispositions. She is a CAPS Incentive packages. During his designate through the National career, Brent has procured more Apartment Association and is a than 600 incentive programs for recent graduate of the Lyceum clients. Program. Kelly actively serves on the Board of Directors as the Vice Chairman and co-chair for the Legislative Committee for the Apartment Association of Kansas City. Attachment 4 NORTHPOINT BY NUMBERS FINANCIAL APPROACH //EMPLOYEE PROFITS // To limit our leverage to no more than 65% loan to cost. Often times our Loan to Value is less than 50%employee bonus pool 25% with our example employees $10m PROJECT 65% LOAN TO COST $6.5m MAX LOAN MAXIMUM We will never purchase land using debt; ONLY CASH $ EMPLOYEE OWNED 30% C A O L L MAXIMIZE INCENTIVES // Proven track record of leveraging S L T A A T R Over $100 MILLION E E$ D in incentives negotiated for our clients E F Attachment 4 KEY PROJECTS LOGISTICS PARK KANSAS CITYRIVERSIDE HORIZONS EDGERTON, KANSASRIVERSIDE, MISSOURI SPRING HILL LOGISTICS CENTERLORDSTOWN LOGISTICS CENTER SPRING HILL, TENNESSEELORDSTOWN, OHIO CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL PARKFORT WAYNE LOGISTICS CENTER FAIRFAX, KANSAS CITY, KSFORT WAYNE, INDIANA LEBANON 65COLUMBUS GROVEPORT I & II INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANACOLUMBUS, OHIO WENTZVILLE LOGISTICS CENTERARLINGTON MANUFACTURING CENTER WENTZVILLE, MISSOURIARLINGTON, TEXAS Attachment 4 AWARDS&RECOGNITIONS Kansas City Business Journal // Best Places to Work 2013 - 2nd Place Small Company Category 2014 - 1st Place Medium Company Category 2015 - 1st Place Medium Company Category Kansas City Business Journal // Capstone Awards 2012 - Multi-family Briarcliff City Apartments 2013 - Industrial Horizons Industrial I • • •• • • • 2013 - Industrial Premium Waters • • • • 2013 - Industrial Premium Waters • 2014 - Retail Mosaic at Shoal Creek 2016 - Industrial Kaw Point Industrial Building • • • • • • • • Apartment Association of Kansas City // Awards 2010 Best Community Brochure Briarcliff City Apartments Best Property Website Briarcliff City Apartments Briarcliff City Apartments 2011 Assistant Manager Of The Year April Binfet, Briarcliff City Apartments White Glove Award Anita Wirth, Briarcliff City Apartments Rookie Of The Year Briarcliff City Apartments Best Landscaping Briarcliff City Apartments 2012 Best Magazine Advertisment Briarcliff City Apartments Property Of The Year Briarcliff City Apartments 2013 Best Property Marketing Plan The Residences At Burlington Creek Best Landscaping Briarcliff City Apartments Best Model Under 5 years The Residences AT Burlington Creek 2014 Company Management Team Of The Year NorthPoint Development Owner of The Year Nathaniel Hagedorn, NorthPoint Development Best Resident Services/Concierge Nicholle Pyle, 45 Madison Model of The Year Village West Luxury Apartments Manager Of The Year Suzanne Congrove, 45 Madison Leasing Professional Of The Year Amy Middleton, 45 Madison Clubhouse/Leasing Of The Year Village West Luxury Apartments Amenities of The Year Village West Luxury Apartments White Glove Award Kimberly Osbourne, 45 Madison Local Management Company Of The Year NorthPoint Development 2015 Management Team Of The Year NorthPoint Development Owner of The Year Nathaniel Hagedorn Multi-site Supervisor of the Year Jenna Patterson Property Manager of the Year Pam Lakey Marketing Director of the Year Nicholle McKenzie Leasing Professional of the Year Melissa Allinder Rookie of the Year Amy Hood White Glove of the Year Christy Jackson Earnst Young Entrepreneur of the Year // 2014 - Nominee Nathaniel Hagedorn Greater Kansas City Chamber // 2015 - Top 10 Small Business Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Attachment 4 OUR EXPERTISE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES // Logistics // Intermodal // Rail Solutions // Refrigerator / Freezer Warehouses // Transportation Logistics // Automotive Manufacturing // Core Distribution // Local & State Incentives // Property Management Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL CLIENTS References available from our clients; a few are “... On a handshake represented below NorthPoint started construction at-risk before contract was issued, in order to preserve the critical path timeline of the project demonstrating that they are a true partner.” - Tim Conder General Motors LLC Global Real Estate Investments “... we were impressed with NorthPoint’s in-house technical capabilities and industrial construction experience which resulted in lowering the total project costs...” - Dan Walker Yanfeng USA Automotive Trim Systems “... NorthPoint delivered on every they made to Magna. Our commitment relationship with NorthPoint Development has been categorically positive, and we look forward to partnering with them on many future projects nationally.” - Jeff Fuller General Manager - Magna Spring Hill Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS // LOGISTICS PARK KANSAS CITY | EDGERTON, KANSAS Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS // LOGISTICS PARK KANSAS CITY | EDGERTON, KANSAS // 15,000,000 SF Masterplanned Industrial Park // $750,000,000 Total Project Cost Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS // CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL PARK | KANSAS CITY, KANSAS Inergy Automotive Plant // Tier 1 Gas Tank Manufacturing Facility // 80,000 SF // 75 FTE // $24,000,000 Total Project Cost Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS // RIVERSIDE HORIZONS INDUSTRIAL PARK | RIVERSIDE, MISSOURI // 250 Acre Masterplanned Industrial Park // 4,000,000 SF // Joint venture with Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance // $300,000,000 Total Project Cost Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS // KAW POINT INDUSTRIAL PARK | KANSAS CITY, KANSAS Site - Pre-demolition Site - Pre-demolition Site - During Construction // 25 Acre Redevelopment // Demolition of 8 existing buildings // 396,000 SF Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS // EDEN ROAD LOGISTICS CENTER | YORK, PENNSYLVANIA // 755,721 SF // Re-development of old Harley Plant // Currently UNDER CONSTRUCTION // Available December 2016 Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS // GROVEPORT PARK, COLUMBUS OHIO // 1,527,844 Total SF // Building 1: 1,001,344 SF - Fully Leased // Building 2: 526,500 SF - Under Construction Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS // 25 KEYSTONE BLVD. | POTTSVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA Attachment 4 INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS // INTERIOR FINISHING SAMPLES Attachment 4 Attachment 4 Spring Hill Seating Systems 701 Beechcroft Rd Spring Hill, TN 37174 Tel: (931)548-3079 www.magna.com Date: December 29, 2014 Subject: NorthPoint Development Please accept this as a letter of recommendation for NorthPoint Development. Magna Seating recently selected NorthPoint for the development of a new 122,500 square foot JIT manufacturing facility in Spring Hill, Tennessee. After the initial green-light of the project, NorthPoint was able to negotiate with local authorities to reduce planning approvals from 12 weeks to under 1 month. Through NorthPoint’s careful and detailed management, the project site progressed from a farm field to a fully operational manufacturing facility in an unbelievably short 6 month time frame. Construction activities were started on a handshake, at risk, to ensure adherence to the extremely aggressive schedule. NorthPoint carefully coordinated with their design team, FM Global, State & local jurisdictions and contractors to keep the project progressing as the building design was being finalized. NorthPoint’s engineering and construction expertise with modern manufacturing facilities was evident, as the facility was completed ahead of schedule and with all the functionality that Magna required. The fast track delivery of the facility was not at the expense of quality or our budget. NorthPoint efficiently and aggressively worked to find Value Engineering opportunities, controlled project costs and met all financial goals established at the outset. In summary – NorthPoint delivered on every commitment they made to Magna. Our relationship with NorthPoint Development has been categorically positive, and we look forward to partnering with them on many future projects nationally. Sincerely, Jeff Fuller General Manager Magna Spring Hill Attachment 4 Global Real Estate General Motors LLC 300 Renaissance Center Mail Code 482-C19-GRE Detroit, MI 48265-3000 Tel: (313) 665-6606 E-mail: timothy.conder@gm.com Via Email February 21, 2014 Mr. Dan Infusino Mr. Rocco Marinaccio Mr. Jason Vermeiren Martinrea Re: General Motors/NorthPoint Dear Messrs: Please let this letter serve as a recommendation for NorthPoint Development on behalf of General Motors (GM). GM has contracted directly with NorthPoint to Design, Engineer, Permit and Construct the new Gas Tank manufacturing facility in Fairfax, KS. This particular project was extremely budget constrained from the start, has a high level of complexity due to the Blow Molding manufacturing process and has an extremely tight, yet critical timeline. Their in-house engineering capabilities, accounting and bond processing staff, experience with local utility companies and municipalities, as well as their ability to handle the negotiation and administration of our State incentives and reporting requirements have made the process seamless and more cost effective for the GM team. Their experience, professionalism, strong local presence, scale and stellar reputation in the community has been able to leverage protection on pricing, avoidance of change orders, and aggressive scheduling for our project. On a handshake, NorthPoint started construction at-risk before a contract was issued, in order to preserve the critical path timeline of the project demonstrating that they are a true partner. NorthPoint has consistently delivered on every commitment that they have made to GM. We look forward to the opportunity to continue our long term partnership with the NorthPoint team in Kansas City, and at our other plant locations in the near future. Regards, Tim Conder Attachment 4 Attachment 4 Attachment 4 Mr. Dan Infusino Mr. Rocco Marinaccio Mr. Jason Vermeiren Yanfeng USA was awardedan automotive supply contractfor the 31XX program at General Motor’s WentzvilleAssembly Plant, and we recently opened a 243,000 +/- square foot production facility at NorthPoint’s Horizons Business Park. As an operational company with limited real estate experience, we relied on NorthPoint for its expertise in design, entitlements and development. Prior to the commencement of construction, we were impressed with NorthPoint’s in-house technical capabilities’ and industrial construction experience which resulted in lowering the total project costs, while improving on the functionality of our new manufacturing facility. They were able to increase our state and local incentive package, manage the IRB & State filing & reporting process and theprocessing of all of our monthly construction draws, tax exempt equipment & bond requisitions and accounting functions for this project. Throughout the predevelopment and development processes, NorthPoint was successful in expediting the project schedule includingbuilding permits, inspections, and a temporary certificate of occupancy (TCO). NorthPoint has an exceptional working relationship with the City of Riverside, Fire Department & Building Codes staff. NorthPoint was able to facilitate TCO’s for the critical path areas of the building, which allowed us to receive and start the installation of our injection molding and process equipment while the balance of the warehouse and office spaces were still under construction. This was absolutely critical to the success of our project and the only way we were able to meet our aggressive timing commitments with GM. I am pleased to report that NorthPoint exceeded our expectations, and I would recommend them for similar manufacturing facilities with expedited schedules. We look forward to working with the NorthPoint team on our upcoming expansion in Riverside as well as future projects in other automotive markets. Sincerely, Dan Walker Yanfeng USA Automotive Trim Systems, Inc. Address: 4110 NW Helena Riverside, Mo 64150 Attachment 4 Attachment 4 Telephone 816-920-7070 Fax 816-920-7171 Seattle Fish CompanyIntl. Quality Since 1918 FRESH FISH AND SEAFOODS 4300 N Mattox Rd Riverside MO 64150 December 21, 2015 Re: Recommendation for NorthPoint Development To Whom It May Concern: Seattle Fish Company recently partnered with NorthPoint on the development of a new 30,000 square foot production and cold storage facility in Riverside, Missouri. Through NorthPoint’s thorough and technical management, the project progressed from an undeveloped parcel into a fully designed and operational facility with a 38F production suite, -10F freezer and refrigerated dock in six months. NorthPoint diligently worked with local authorities to minimize the duration of planning and zoning approvals. Construction activities were started and long lead time refrigeration equipment items were released early to ensure adherence to the aggressive schedule. NorthPoint’s engineering and construction expertise was evident, as the facility was completed on schedule and with the functionality necessary to meet our requirements. NorthPoint did not allow the aggressive schedule to impact the budget. NorthPoint acted as valued partner, continuously providing updated and transparent accounting throughout the project. Our relationship with NorthPoint Development has been very enjoyable, and we hope to partner with them on future projects. Sincerely, Scott Godke General Manager Seattle Fish Company Attachment 5 N 00°02'07" E 433.88 ±36,050 SF FOOTPRINT ±11,600 SF N 8 9 N° 5 8 8 ' 9 0 ° 7 4 " 9 E ' 5 3 0 2 " 3 W . 0 30 2 3 . 0 0 N 00°02'07" E 435.02 35,400 ±SF FOOTPRINT, 3-4 STORIES3.22 ±ACRES © Attachment 6 LOCAL CONDITIONS. TREES SHALL BE AT LEAST 2½ INCHES IN DIAMETER FOR DECIDUOUS TREES AND EIGHT FEET TALL FOR SMALL DECIDUOUS (ORNAMENTAL) TREES, 1½ INCHES IN DIAMETER, BALLED AND BURLAPPED.LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES, 2½ INCHES IN DIAMETER, BALLED AND BURLAPPED.A PLANTING SCREEN SHALL CONSIST OF EVERGREEN PLANTINGS. TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2½ INCHES IN TRUNK © Attachment 7 DRAWING INFORMATION PHASESHEET DESCRIPTIONREGISTRATIONARCHITECTPROJECT NAME ISSUE RECORD Attachment 8 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: Beyond Self Storage - Cope Avenue at English Street PROJECT NO: 16-23 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Staff Engineer DATE: 8-8-2016 PLAN SET: Engineering plansdated 7-26-2016 REPORTS: Storm Water Management Report – Dated 7-26-2016 Theapplicant is proposing toconstruct a 3-story self-storage facility at the northeast corner of Cope Avenue and English Street.The applicant is requesting a review of the current design. As theamount of disturbance on this site is greater than 0.5 acre, the applicantis requiredto meet the City’s stormwater quality, rate control, and other stormwater management requirements.The submitted stormwater management plan depicts the project meeting the City’s requirements via the use of an infiltration basin. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents for final review.Thefollowing are engineeringreview comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Drainage and Stormwater Management 1)The project shall be submitted to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) for review. All conditions of RWMWD shall be met. Permit coverage from the RWMWD is required prior to the issuance of a City grading permit. 2)Emergency overland overflows shall be identified on the plansfor the underground infiltration system. 3)High water level for the proposed infiltration basin shall be shown on the grading plan. Grading and Erosion Control 4)All slopesshall be 3H:1V or flatter. 5)Inlet protection devices shall be installed on allexistingand proposedonsite storm seweruntil all exposed soils onsite are stabilized.This includes storm sewer on adjacent streets that could potentially receive construction related sedimentor debris. Attachment 8 6) Bio-roll or silt-fencing shall be installed at intervals along the slopes and left in place until vegetation is established. 7)Adjacent streetsand parking areasshall be swept as needed to keep the pavement clear of sediment and construction debris. 8)All pedestrian facilities shall be ADA compliant. 9)A copy of the project SWPPP and NDPES Permit shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10)The total grading volume (cut/fill) shall be noted on the plans. 11)All emergency overland overflows shall contain adequate stabilization to prevent soils from eroding during large storm events. 12)Construction details shall be provided for the proposed infiltration basin. 13)Plant establishment phasing details shall be provided to ensure a successful establishment of plants within the infiltration basin area. The concern is that the seeded areas could have difficulty establishing with runoff Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 14)The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project.A SAC determination is required prior to the issuance of permits. 15)Water system modifications shall bereviewed by Saint Paul regional Water Services. Other 16)Sidewalk shall be installed along the property frontage on Cope Avenue. 17)The plans shall be signed by a professional engineer currently licensed in the State of Minnesota. 18)The Owner shall submit a signedcopy of the joint storm-water maintenance agreement beingprepared for the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed Districttothe Cityprior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19)The applicant shall satisfy the requirements of all other permitting agencies. Please provide copies of other required permits and approvals. Attachment 8 Public Works Permits The following permits are required by the Public Works Department for this project. The applicant should verify the need for other City permits with the Building Department. 20)Grading and erosion control permit 21)Sanitary Sewer Permit 22)Storm Sewer Connection Permit 23)Right-of-way permit for work on Cope Avenue -END COMMENTS - Attachment 9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, JJ Jenkins of NorthPoint Development, applied for a conditional use permit to build a new indoor storage building that is within 350 feet of residential property. WHEREAS, this permit applies to thevacant property at the northeast corner of English Street North and Cope Avenue East. The legal descriptions for the property are: Parcel A: All that part of the West 398 feet of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter inSection 10, Township 29, Range 22, City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, lyingSoutherly and Westerly of the following described dividing line:Commencing at the Southwest comer of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the SouthWestQuarter, thence South 89 degrees 51 minutes 56 seconds East 342.00 feet, along the South line of saidSouth Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the point of beginning of the followingdescribed dividing line; thence North 91.66 feat along a line parallel to and 342.00 feet East of the West line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 45 degrees 00minutes 00 seconds East 29,70 feet; thence North 64,71 feet along a line parallel to and 363,00 feetEast of said West line; thence South 89 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds West 128.50 feet along a lineparallel with the South right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 36: thence North 125.00 feet along a lineparallel 10 and 234.50 feet East from the said West line:thence South 89 degrees 56 minutes 00seconds West parallel to said South right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 36 to the West line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. Parcel B: All that part of the West 398 feet of the South Half of theNorthwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter inSection 10, Township 29, Range 22, City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, lyingNortherly and Easterly of the following described dividing line:Commencing at the Southwest corner of the South Hail of the Northwest Quarter of the South WestQuarter; thence South 89 degrees 51 minutes 56 seconds East 342.00 feet, along the South line of saidSouth Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the point of beginning of the followingdescribed dividing line; thence North 91.86 feet along a line parallel to and 342,00 feet East of the Westline of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 29,70fee1; thence North64,71 feet along a line parallel to and 363.00 feet East of said West line; thence South 89 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds West 128.50 feet along a line parallel with the South right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 36; thence North 125.00 feet along a line parallel to and 234.50 feet East from the said West line: thence South 89 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds West parallel to said South right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 36 to the West line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. Subject to public right-of-way for Cope Avenue and English Street. Attachment 9 WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows: 1.The planning commission held a public hearing on August 16, 2016. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council ________ this conditional use permit revision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council _________ the above- described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because: 1.The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and this Code. 2.The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3.The use would not depreciate property values. 4.The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5.The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. 6.The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7.The use would not create excessive additional costsfor public facilities or services. 8.The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9.The use would cause no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions (additions underlined, deletions crossed out): 1.Adherence tothesubmitted plans dated August 5, 2016. Staff may approve minor changes. 2.Thelandscape plan shall berevised for staff’s approvalshowing: a.Size, species, and location of all significant trees on the property; location of trees protected and measures for protection. 3.Outdoor storage and sales are not allowed anywhere on site. Attachment 9 4.Any rooftop equipment installed on the building must be screened from the residential properties to the south. 5.If parking shortages develop, applicant will be required to install additional parking spaces. 6.The proposed use must be substantially startedwithin one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 7.The city council shall review this permit in one year. The Maplewood City Council ___________ this resolution on ____________, 2016.