Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-05-24 CDRB Packet AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Tuesday,May 24, 2016 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers -Maplewood City Hall 1830 County Road B East 1.Call to Order 2.Roll Call 3.Approval of Agenda 4.Approval of Minutes: a.April 26, 2016 5.Design Review: a.Consider Approval of a Comprehensive Sign Plan for Sarrack’s Liquors, 2305 Stillwater Road East b.ConsiderApproval of a Proposed Medical Office Building, Northwest Corner of Hazelwood Street North and Beam Avenue East a.Conditional Use Permit Resolution b.Design Plans c.Comprehensive Sign Plan Amendment d.Lot Division 6.New Business: a.Approval of a Resolution of Appreciation for Leo Burger 7.Visitor Presentations: 8.Board Presentations: 9.Staff Presentations: 10.Adjourn MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2016 1.CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Kempecalled the meeting to order at6:00p.m. 2.ROLL CALL Boardmember, Leo BurgerAbsent Chairperson, Bill KempePresent Boardmember,Jason LamersAbsent Vice Chairperson,Matt LedvinaPresent Boardmember,Ananth ShankarPresent Staff Present:Michael Martin, Economic Development Coordinator 3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA BoardmemberLedvinamoved to approve the agenda as approved. Seconded by BoardmemberShankar.Ayes -All The motion passed. 4.APPROVAL OF MINUTES BoardmemberShankarmoved to approve the March 22,2016,CDRB minutes as submitted. Seconded by Chairperson Kempe.Ayes –Chairperson Kempe & Boardmember Shankar Abstention –Boardmember Ledvina The motion passed. 5.DESIGN REVIEW a.Consider Approval of Design Plans for a Proposed Gas Canopy Expansion, Costco, 1431 Beam Avenue East i.Economic Development Coordinator, Mike Martin gave the report on the design plans for a proposed gas canopy expansion for Costco, 1431 Beam Avenue. nd Avenue South Kent, ii.Angelo Bologna, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., 18215 -72 Washington, addressed and answered questions of the board. Boardmember Ledvinamoved to approvethe plans date-stamped April 1, 2016, for the proposed 2,468-square-foot fuel canopy expansion at the Costco Wholesale store located at 1431 Beam Avenue East. Approval is subject to the applicant complying with the following conditions: April 26, 2016 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 1 1.This approval is good for two years. After two years, the design-review process shall be repeated if the developer has not begun construction. 2.All requirements of the building official must be met. 3.The applicants shall obtain all required permits from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District and Ramsey County. 4.The applicants shall comply with all requirements of the Maplewood Engineering Report from Jon Jarosch dated April 8, 2016. 5.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of environmental and economic development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Chairperson Kempe.Ayes –All The motion passed. This item does not need to be heard by the city council. b.Consider Approval of Design Plans for a Proposed Restaurant Building, Taco Bell, 1965 County Road D East i.Economic Development Coordinator, Mike Martin gave the report for design plans for a proposed restaurant building for Taco Bell at 1965 County Road D East. ii.Barb Schneider, Border Foods, 5425 Boone Avenue North, New Hope, addressed and answered questions of the board. iii.Architectfor Border Foods, Dean Mattson, Apple Valley, addressed and answered questions of the board. The board had concerns regarding the yellow color on the ballards and requested that the applicant change the color to a complimentary color. Boardmember Ledvinamoved to approvethe plans date-stamped April 1, 2016, for the proposed building, site and landscaping plans for 1965 County Road D East. Approval is subject to the following conditions:(changes are underlined and in bold) 1.Approval of design plans is good for two years. If the applicant has not begun construction within two years, this design review shall be repeated. Staff may approve minor changes to these plans. 2.The applicantshall comply with the conditions noted in the engineering report by Jon Jarosch, dated April 1, 2016. 3.The applicant shall comply with the conditions noted in the environmental report by Shann Finwall and Ginny Gaynor, dated April 11, 2016. 4.The applicantshall comply with the conditions noted in the MnDOT letter submitted to the city by Michael Corbett, dated April 14, 2016.The applicant shall work with MnDOT to determine the need for permits for the right of way,if they are necessary. April 26, 2016 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 2 5.The applicant shall provide an irrevocable letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of 150 percent of the cost of installing the landscaping, before getting a building permit. 6.The applicant shall changethe color of the ballards to match the color of the tan neechiadiscussed at the board meeting. Seconded by Chairperson Kempe.Ayes –All The motion passed. This item does not need to go to the city council. 6.NEW BUSINESS a.Upcoming City Council Workshop Regarding City Commissions and Boards i.Economic Development Coordinator, Mike Martin said a city council workshop is coming up on May 23, 2016 to discuss the city’s volunteer commissions and boards to discuss combining boards and commissions. There has been a reductionof volunteers applying for openings on theboards and commissions. Some boards and commissions have difficulty having enough members to have a quorum. If there is a change in direction by the city council an ordinance will have to be updated. No action is required. 7.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. 8.BOARDPRESENTATIONS None. 9.STAFF PRESENTATIONS None. 10.ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Chairperson Kempeat6:47p.m. April 26, 2016 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager FROM: Shann Finwall, AICP, Environmental Planner DATE: May 18, 2016 SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Stillwater Road Introduction Chris Sarrack, o Plan in order to add a mural to the south side of the building. Background building. The sign code prohibits painted wall signs, but it does allow murals with an approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. Staff notified the owner, Chris Sarrack, that painted wall signs are prohibited and murals would require an approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. Mr. Sarrack submitted a Comprehensive Sign Plan application on April 12, 2016, in order to receive City approval for the mural. Discussion Existing Signs The property is zoned Business Commercial Modified. The sign code for this zoning district allows one wall sign for each street frontage. The size of the wall sign is determined by the size is limited to two wall signs that are 80 square feet in area or smaller. The sign code also allows one freestanding sign for each street frontage. The size of the freestanding sign is determined by the street classification of the street the sign is installed. is limited to two freestanding signs that are 140 square feet in area and 20 feet in height along Stillwater Road and 100 square feet in area and 15 feet in height along Reaney Avenue. The sign code allows one temporary banner to be displayed for up to 60 days per year, per property at any one time. All signs shall be kept in repair and in proper state of preservation. The display surfaces of all signs shall be kept neatly painted or posted at all times. , one freestanding sign, and nine temporary banners/signs. Eight of the temporary signs are placed in frames on the front of the building and one banner is installed below the frames. Comprehensive Sign Plan The sign code requires a Comprehensive Sign Plan for murals on business premises. The plan must include the location, size, height, color, lighting and orientation of all signs and murals. Approval of a Comprehensive Sign Plan allows flexibility from the sign code for the plan as a whole if it results in an improved relationship between the signs, building, and neighborhood. Comprehensive Sign Plans can also allow exemptions to temporary banner signs if there are unusual circumstances with the request. sign code requirements for size and location. The north side of the freestanding sign has a hole in the sign face which should be repaired. The property is only allowed one temporary banner to be installed for 60 days per banner. The existing banners exceed the sign code time allowance, but are neatly placed in pre-made frames on the front of the building. Staff recommends the temporary signs be approved as an exemption to the temporary sign code through the Comprehensive Sign Plan. The banner installed below the framed temporary signs should be removed. A mural is defined as a design, image, or expression on the exterior of a building, generally for the purpose of decoration or artistic expression, including, but not limited to paintings, markings, and etchings and does not include any on or off-site advertisement. Murals must be tasteful, in keeping with the business premise and surrounding properties, and not contain any defamatory, obscene, treasonous expressions or opinions, including graffiti. Miller beer in addition to the name of the store, but staff finds the mural tasteful and in keeping with the business premise and surrounding properties. Staff recommends approving the mural as painted as part of the flexibilities allowed through the Comprehensive Sign Plan. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Compr East to have a 72 square foot mural on the south wall. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. shall be limited to: a. One wall sign on the canopy on the east wall. Wall sign must meet the size and placement requirements in the sign code. b. One freestanding sign on the east side of the property, adjacent Stillwater Road. The freestanding sign must meet the size and placement requirements in the sign code. c. One 72 square foot mural on the south wall. 2 d. Eight temporary sign frames located on the east wall. Temporary signs placed in the sign frames can be displayed for 60 days. 2. The applicant must take the following actions within 60 days of approval of the Comprehensive Sign Plan: a. Repair the north sign face on the existing freestanding sign. b. Remove all temporary banners that are not located within the approved temporary sign frames outlined above. 3. Staff may approve minor modifications to the sign plan. Attachments 1. Site Plan 2. Existing Signs 3. Mural 3 City HallsSchoolsHospitalsFire StationsPolice StationsRecreational CentersParcel PointsParcel BoundariesAirports Enter Map Description LegendNotes accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and Feet 200.0 2305 Stillwater Road East 100.00 0 200.0 NAD_1983_HARN_Adj_MN_Ramsey_Feet© Ramsey County Enterprise GIS Division wide high 12' 6' area) in s.f. (72 Wall South on Mural MEMORANDUM TO:Melinda Coleman, City Manager FROM:Michael Martin, AICP, Economic Development Coordinator DATE:May 18, 2016 SUBJECT:ConsiderApproval of a Proposed Medical Office Building, Northwest Corner of Hazelwood Street North and Beam Avenue East a.Conditional Use Permit Resolution b.Design Plans c.Comprehensive Sign Plan Amendment d.Lot Division Introduction Patrick Giordana, on behalf of Davis Group Development, is seeking approval to build an 80,000-square-foot medical office building on the vacant property located at the northwest corner of Hazelwood Street and Beam Avenue. Additional phases will include another 60,000 square feet of medical office space and a retail building near Beam Avenue. The applicant is requesting city approval for a conditional use permit, design plans, comprehensive sign plan and lot division. Background On November 10, 1997the city council approved a conditional use permit and design review for afuel station, convenience store, bank and car wash. This project now sits on a separate legal parcel. Discussion Conditional Use Permit This site is zoned light manufacturing (m1) which requires all new buildings within 350 feet of residential property toreceive approval from the city council fora conditional use permit. Cardinal Pointe, a senior cooperative living community is directly to the north of this site. All 108 units of this building were notified of this proposed project and given the chance to provide feedback. The main concerns focused on landscaping and screening between the sites. The medical office building is within the 350 foot range, the proposed retail building would be more than 800 feet from the Cardinal Pointeparcel. Landscaping This parcel is currently vacant and holds 51 significant trees. The applicant is proposing to remove all but one of the site’s significant trees. The city’s tree preservation ordinance is in affect for this site and development. The residents to the north have expressed concern about the loss of the trees and other natural screening. City ordinance requires a landscaped, and possiblyscreened area, of not less than 20 feet when a nonresidential use abuts a residentially zoned property. Parking lots are also required to be setback 20 feet from shared residential property lines. A petition was signed by 110 residents ofCardinal Pointeand submitted to the city asking for a green space of at least 50 yards –150 feet–between the new medical office building at its property line. A 150-foot green space requirement would equate to approximately 1.4 acres or 16 percent of the 9.13 acre site. The Cardinal Pointebuilding is currently setback approximately 68 feet from the south property line. Cardinal Pointeresidents currently use the area south of their building for a bocce ball court and other social activities. In response to the neighborhood concerns and to work towards meeting the tree preservation requirements, the applicant submitted an updated landscape plan showing 33,8-foot-tall pine and spruce trees along the shared Cardinal Pointeproperty line. The proposed trees should provide adequate screening between the two parcels. The project’s first phase will have a building setback of almost 280 feet from the property line to the north and the trees will be planted as part of this first phase to allow additional maturation of the trees prior to phase two. In addition, when the medical office project is built out there will be approximately 88 feet between the Cardinal Pointebuilding and the parking lot and 172feet between buildings. Traffic Another concern heard from the neighborhood regarding this project is the impact it will have on existing traffic. The city’s engineering department required the applicant to submit a traffic study, which the results will be ready by the June 7 planning commission public hearing meeting. This traffic study will also incorporate any potential impacts by the recently approved Conifer Ridge apartment projectwithin Legacy Village. Design Plans Building Design The new building’s exterior will consist of stone and brick veneer, composite metalpanels and roof cap details, glass curtain walls and punched style windows, and a distinctive glass canopy at thebuilding’s main entrance. The building incorporates an exterior roof deck for use by staff and patients.The applicantwill be required to apply for city design approval prior to the second phase of the medical office building and the retail building being built. Site Plan The primary accessto the site is from Hazelwood Streetand would align with the main access to St. John’s Hospital–Hazelwood has already been programmed for this access. A secondary accessis a current shareddrivelocated along Beam Avenue.The proposed buildings and parking lots meet all setback requirements–including the required 100 foot setback between the medical office building and the north property line. Parking City ordinance requiresonespace for every 200 square feet of building square footagefor office buildings. This means the first phase of the development, 80,000 square feet, would require 400 spaces.The applicant’s site plan indicates a total of 410parking spaces will be provided to serve the first phase of the development. Parking count analyses would be required for future phases. Landscaping In addition to the discussion earlier in the report regarding the 33 trees being planted along the north property line, 154 more trees will be planted throughout the site as well. More than 700 shrubs, perennials and ornamental grasses willalso be planted attractively throughout the site. Lighting The applicant’s photometric plan shows the proposed lighting will be meeting the city’s lighting ordinance requirements. Comprehensive Sign Plan Comprehensive sign plans are required for business premises with five or more tenants on the premises and all multiple-story buildings with two or more tenants in the building.The applicant is proposing a main 10’ x 30’ sign over the main entrance, three 3’ x 25’ tenant signs on the east building elevation and two 3’ x 25’ tenant signs on the south building elevation. No signs are being proposed for the west or north elevation. Any signs for future phases would require amending this sign plan. Lot Division The applicant is requesting the property be divided in threeto create a parcel for each phase. The proposed lot division does not create any issues with the city’s comprehensive plan or zoning ordinance. The threeparcels will requirecross access easements. In addition, a cross access easement will be required for the shared drive with the 1535 Beam Avenue parcel. Department Comments Building Department Nick Carver, building official –Applicant must follow all Minnesota State Building Code requirements. Fire Department Butch Gervais, fire marshal –Applicant will be required to add fire protection throughout the entire building with visual and audio notification inside per code and the system is required to be monitored. Fire department lock box is required. Permits are required for all work and must be done by a licensedcontractor. Police Department Paul Schnell, police chief –No issues. Engineering Department Below are staff engineer’s initial comments: 1.The applicantwill need to submit stormwater calculations for an official project review. It should be noted that the biofiltration basin would receive a 55% credit for volume reduction as proposed. If they changed the filter media to an iron-enhanced version, they would receive and 80% credit for the basin volume. 2.The project will need to be reviewed by the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District for stormwater and erosion control purposes. I would also highly encourage the applicant to discuss the Watersheds GrantProgram and how they can work together to best meet both parties goals. 3.Ramsey County will need to review the project for impacts to Beam Avenue, as well as the signal system at Beam and Hazelwood. 4.An analysis will need to be performed to ensure the sanitary sewer system has the capacity for the proposed development. Likewise, a traffic impact study will be needed to assess the impacts to Hazelwood, Beam, and the intersection of the two. These studies can be done by the applicant and reviewed by the City, or the City can hire a consultant to perform the studies and charge the applicant the appropriate costs. 5.Saint Paul Water will need to review the water system improvements. Budget Impact None Recommendation A.Adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permit for a medical office building and retail building to be constructed on a parcel within the light manufacturing (m1) zoning district that is within 350 feet of a residential zoning district. Approval of this resolution is based on the findings required by the ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1.All construction shall follow the plans date-stamped May 18, 2016. The director of the environmental and economic development department may approve minor changes. 2.The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3.The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant must meet the requirements of the city’s tree preservation ordinance. 5.This permit approves the first and second phases of the medical office building and the retail building near Beam Avenue. All phases must receive city approval of design plans before a building permit can be issued. B.Approve the plans date-stamped May 18, 2016for the proposed medical office building at Hazelwood Street North and Beam Avenue east.Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Approval of design plans is good for two years. If the applicant has not begun construction within two years, this design review shall be repeated. Staff may approve minor changes. 2.All trash receptacles must either be kept inside the building or an outside trash enclosure must be built on site. 3.Satisfy the requirements set forth in thisreport bystaff engineer Jon Jarosch. 4.Satisfy the requirements set forth in the environmentalreport authored by Shann Finwall, datedMay 13, 2016. 5.Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a grading or building permit: a.Final grading, paving, drainage, utility, traffic/street improvement and erosion control plans. These plans shall meet the requirements of the city code and the city engineer. b.Verification that all watershed district special provisions, as indicated on the watershed district permit, are met before the city issues a building or grading permit for the site. c.Payment of the required park availability chargeof$286,344, as determined by city ordinance. d.A cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. 6.The applicant or the contractor shall complete the following before occupying the building: a.Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. b.Install a reflectorized stop sign at the exitsand a handicap-parking sign for each handicap accessible parking space. c.Install an in-ground lawn irrigation system for the parking lot islands and for all landscape areas (except the ponding areas). d.Post signs identifying the customer and employee parking spaces. e.Install all the required exterior improvements, including landscaping and signs. f.Install all bituminous and the engineered porous or permeable surface and the curb and gutter. g.Stripe all drive aisles. h.Install all required landscaping by June 1 if the buildingis finished in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of completion if it is finished in the spring or summer. i.Install all exterior lighting. j.Screen all roof-mounted equipment visible from public streets. 7.If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: a.The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b.The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. 8.All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of the environmental and economic developmentdepartment may approve minor changes. 9.This approval does not include any of the other buildings on the site (onlythefirst phase medical office building). The owner shall apply to the city for design approval for each of the additional phases (including the architectural, landscaping and drainage plans). The community design review board (CDRB) must approve the project plans for each of these buildings before the city can issue a building permit for each building. C.Approve the plans date-stamped May 18, 2016for a comprehensive sign plan to allow signage for a new medical office building located at Hazelwood . Approval of the comprehensive sign plan amendment is subject to the following conditions: 1.Signs on the east elevation shall be limited to one 10’ x 30’ sign over the main entrance andthree 3’ x 25’ tenant signs. 2.Signs on the south elevation shall be limited to two 3’ x 25’ tenant signs. 3.No signs are permittedfor the west or north elevations. 4.Any signs for future phases willrequire amendment ofthis sign plan. D.Approve the lot division for the Hazelwood Medical Office Building, subject to the following conditions: a.The applicant shall comply with the requirements ofthe city’s engineer. b.Prior to submittingto the county for recording, cross access easement agreements shall be submitted to city staff covering the three created parcels and the shared drive with 1535 Beam Avenue East. Citizen Comments Staffsurveyed the 130property owners –including the 108 units within Cardinal Pointe-within 500 feet of this property for their comments about this proposal. Staff received a petition signed by 110 residents and the following 6 comments. A copy of the petition is included with this report as an attachment. For 1.“HealthEastand St. John’s Hospital supports the development of this office building.” (Doug Davenport, SVP, CFO of HealthEast) Against 1.“We believe there is already enough medical buildings in area. More added traffic on Hazelwood St. When a survey was done for apartment buildings on County Road D and Hazelwood Cardinal Pointeand Legacy Village were against it and council passed it anyway, so don’t know if surveys help. (Les Kotula, 3003 HazelwoodSt., Unit 204) 2.“I visited with you by phone last week and need to put in my objection to this proposal as it does not include any green space between the northern boundary line with Cardinal Pointe.Both myself in Unit 201 and my partner Elizabeth Vonderharr in Unit 200 face this boundary and feel that here should be a green space along the boundary to protect some of the tall trees and greenery that is currently there.Replacing a 75 foottree with a 5 foot. twig is not an adequate substitution.As I mentioned we have circulated a petition here at Cardinal Pointeand there are over 100 Maplewood residents that support this request for a “GREEN SPACE’ TO PROVIDE SOME NATURAL BEAUTY IN THIS PROPOSAL”.We feel that this is not an unreasonable request and ask that you contact the developers to tell them of our concern and request that they change their plan to accommodate this request.Thank you.”(Thomas Carey, 3003 Hazelwood St., Unit 201) 3.“Consideration given to requiring “green zone” of 50 yards between Cardinal Pointeon the north.”(Truman Ingersoll, 3003 Hazelwood St., Unit 133) 4.“My main concernis the additional traffic Hazelwood Street would receive. I face Hazelwood and observe traffic that speeds both ways (mornings and early evenings are heavy) Monday –Friday. Speeding along with noisy mufflers in this mostly residential area should be enforced! Speeding is a problem and will increase with the addition of this building.”(Janet Stolts, 3003 Hazelwood St., Unit 332) No Comments “I have no comments.” (Barbara Hart, 3003HazelwoodSt., Unit 207) Reference Information Site Description Site size: 9.13acres Existing land use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses North: Cardinal Pointe South: Beam Avenue, fuel station and bank West: Bruce Vento Trail East: Hazelwood Street and St. John’s Hospital Planning Land Use Plan designation: C (commercial) Zoning: M1(light manufacturing) Attachments 1.Location Map 2.Land Use Map 3.Zoning Map 4.Applicant’s Letter, April 25, 2016 5.Proposed Site and Landscape Plan 6.Building Elevations 7.Environmentreport, Shann Finwall,May 13, 2016 8.Cardinal PointeResident Petition 9.Applicant’s plans (separate attachment) Attachment 1 Maplewood Heights Kohlman Lake Hazelwood Sherwood Glen Parkside Western Hills Gladstone Hillside Beaver Lake Battle Creek Vista Hills Highwood Carver Ridge Maplewood, City of Maplewood Hazelwood Medical Office Building - Overview Map Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Conditional Use Permit, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, Design Review, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Comprehensive Sign Plan MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the and Lot Division GIS user community Attachment 2 Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, Hazelwood Medical Office Building - Land Use Map Legend CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, Conditional Use Permit, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, High Density Residential Commercial MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Design Review, Open Space Comprehensive Sign Plan and Lot Division Attachment 3 Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, Hazelwood Medical Office Building - Zoning Map Legend CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, Conditional Use Permit, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Business Commercial Modified (bcm) MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Design Review, Planned Unit Development (pud) Comprehensive Sign Plan and Lot Division Light Manufacturing (m1) Open Space/Park Attachment 4 W:\\2016\\16108\\CADD DATA\\LANDSCAPE\\_dwg Sheet Files\\Phase 1\\L1-1 Plotted: 05 /11 / 2016 4:18 PM Attachment 5 DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGEDCABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORELEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 ATMAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES.EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES INTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: L2-1TREE PRESERVATION PLANL1-1Checked ByProject Lead04/22/16CITY SUBMITTAL03/18/16PRELIMINARY PRICING Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify themade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additionsrevisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall beinformation and reference only. All intentional or unintentionalpermitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files forConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may beof this project by others without written approval by theon other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionwith respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be usedinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solelyCADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed LandscapeI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my 222 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SUITE 3255 Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Debra Brodsho REG. NO. HAZELWOOD PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE LANDSCAPE THE DAVIS GROUP MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 23849 SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS CADD QUALIFICATION Maplewood, Minnesota QUALITY CONTROL L1-1 PHASE 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN DATE M.O.B. PLAN DBDB Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 7 Environmental Review Project: Hazelwood Medical Office Building Dateof Plans: April 22, 2016 (Tree and Landscape Plan) Date of Review: May 13, 2016 Location: Northwest Corner of Hazelwood Street and Beam Avenue Reviewer: Shann Finwall, Environmental Planner (651) 249-2304;shann.finwall@maplewoodmn.gov Background: BDH+Young are proposing to construct an approximately 140,000 square foot office building on the vacant lot located onthe northwest corner of Hazelwood Street and Beam Avenue. The office building will be constructed on the south side of the lot, with a phase 2 office building development on the north side of the lot. The applicant proposes to grade and remove trees on the entire site for the first phase of the development. Tree Preservation Ordinance:Maplewood’s tree preservation ordinance describes a significant tree as a hardwood tree with a minimum of 6 inches in diameter, an evergreen tree with a minimum of 8 inches in diameter, and a softwood tree with a minimum of 12 inches in diameter. The ordinance requires any significant tree removed to be replaced based on a tree mitigation calculation. The calculation takes into account the size of a tree and bases replacement on that size. In essence, the ordinance requires an applicant to plant a greater amount of smaller replacement trees because they removed a significant number of large trees. Tree Removal and Required Replacement:Thetree plan shows 51 significant trees, 853 inches in diameter. The applicant proposes to remove 50 significant trees, 832 inches in diameter. The required tree replacement is 967.7 caliper inches. Thelandscape plan shows 187 new trees, 497 caliper inches. This is 470.7 caliper inches, or 235 trees, short of the requirement. It is clear that 235 additional trees will not fit on the property. Recommendation: In order to comply with the City’s tree preservation ordinance, the applicant must: 1.Submit a revised landscape plan that shows the following additional trees, larger trees, or mulched beds of native or drought tolerant shrubs to increase the number of replacement trees. 2.If the applicant is still unable to meet the tree replacement requirements through additional trees, larger trees, or shrubs, they may pay into the City’s tree fund as outlined in the City’s tree standards. Attachment 8 Attachment 8 Attachment 8 Attachment 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager FROM: Michael Martin, Economic Development Coordinator DATE: May 18, 2016 SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution of Appreciation for Leo Burger Introduction Leo Burger recently moved out of the city of Maplewood and did not apply to renew his term as a member of the Maplewood Community Design Review Board (CDRB). His granddaughter recently contacted city staff to update his residence information. The city council appointed Mr. Burger to the CDRB on February 26, 2013 and he served until April 26, 2016. Budget Impact None Recommendation Approve a resolution of appreciation for Community Design Review Board member Leo Burger Attachment 1. Resolution of Appreciation for Leo Burger RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Leo Burger has been a member of the Maplewood Community Design Review Board since February 26, 2013 and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Community Design Review Board has appreciated Leo’s experience, insights and good judgment; and WHEREAS, Leo has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, Leo has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed his leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens that Leo is hereby extended our gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on ___________, 2016 ____________________________________ Nora Slawik, Mayor Passed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board On _____________, 2016 ____________________________________ Bill Kempe, Chairperson Attest: ________________________________ Karen Haag, City Clerk