Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-04-19 PC Packet AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday,April 19, 2016 7:00PM Council Chambers -Maplewood City Hall 1830 County Road B East 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes a.March 15, 2016 5.Public Hearing a.7:00 p.m. or later: Consider Approval of a Conditional Use Permit Resolution, Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church,1055 Viking Drive 6.New Business a.Consider Approval of Amendments to the Mixed Use Zoning District b.Consider Approval of aResolution of Appreciation for Dale Trippler 7.Unfinished Business 8.Visitor Presentations 9.Commission Presentations a.April 11, 2016city council meeting–Commissioner Trippler Overnight Parking 1-Yr Pilot Project in Legacy Village b.May 9, 2016city council meeting–Commissioner Dahm Resolution for a Conditional Use Permit Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church Mixed Use Zoning Amendment Resolution of Appreciation for Dale Trippler 10.Staff Presentations 11.Adjournment MINUTESOF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, MARCH 15,2016 7:00 P.M. 1.CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Commissionwas held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order at 7:02p.m.by Chairperson Arbuckle. 2.ROLL CALL Paul Arbuckle, ChairpersonPresent Frederick Dahm, CommissionerPresent Tushar Desai,CommissionerPresent John Donofrio, CommissionerPresent Absent Allan Ige, Commissioner Bill Kempe, CommissionerPresent Dale Trippler, Vice ChairpersonPresent Staff Present: Michael Martin,Economic Development Coordinator 3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA CommissionerTripplermoved to approve the agenda as submitted. Seconded by CommissionerKempe.Ayes –All The motion passed. 4.APPROVAL OF MINUTES CommissionerTripplermoved to approve theFebruary 23,2016, PCminutes as submitted. Seconded by CommissionerKempe.Ayes –Chairperson Arbuckle, Commissioner’s Desai, Donofrio, Kempe,Trippler Abstention –Commissioner Dahm The motion passed. 5.PUBLIC HEARING None. 6.NEW BUSINESS a.Consider Approval of Overnight Parking Allowed 1-Yr Pilot Project in Legacy Village in Response to Homeowner Petition i.Economic Development Coordinator, Michael Martin introduced the item and turned the discussion over to Public Works Director Michael Thompson. Mr. Martin also answered questions of the commission. March 15, 2016 1 Planning CommissionMeetingMinutes ii.Public Works Director, Michael Thompson gave the presentation on the overnight parking in Legacy Village and answered questions of the commission. iii.Maplewood Police, Michael Shortreed and Joe Steiner introduced themselves to the staff and commission. Maplewood Officer Shortreed answered questions of the commission regarding parking and the correlation of crime with parking on the streets. There was a petition signed by 43 residents of the Cottages of Legacy Village requesting that 24 hour parking be allowed on the two sections of Hazelwood and one of Legacy Parkway adjacent to the property and designated area on the map in the staff report. Four residents came forward to address the commission. Chairperson Arbuckle asked residents to come forward to address the commission. 1.Suzanne Fry, 3060 Cottage Lane, addressed the commission. 2.Shelly Kaufman, 3036 Cottage Lane, addressed the commission. 3.Ken Hartman, 3022 Hazelwood Street, addressed the commission. 4.Richard Van Wagner, 3010 Hazelwood Street, addressed the commission. The residents expressed comments and concernswhichincluded: 1.Buying these units has been very difficult to sell because there are only two parking spaces and no driveway. If you rent the unit out and there three and four bedrooms to a unit you can still only park 2 cars there so if you are renting to three or four single people there is not sufficient parking for the same number of renters. 2.I would never buy in this development but I am currently renting here. I have college kids that come home on breaks and there is no place for them to park their cars. 3.I bought here and at the time had no children. Life changes occur. You could meet someone after the fact thatmay have older kids and they need a place to put their cars. 4.Right now I have small kids but have enough room to raise a family, however due to the parking issueshere I will be moving out of Maplewood when the kids are at the age to drive because of the parking issues. 5.When we bought here we were told there was visitor parking, we did not know the parking was no overnight parking so that doesn’t help if you have overnight visitors and there is no parkingbetween2 am and6 am. 6.With winter and snow on the roads parking is even tighter and the roads are even narrower through here which is dangerous with clearance and backing up. 7.The commission has made recommendations of where they thing additional pavement could be added for more parking but due to the grading and drainage of the area you can’t have more pervious surface and not expect to have flooding issues with basements in these units. Commissioner Kempe stated he thought the commission should recommend approval of this project for one year and see how it goes. In his opinion the developer was greedy and wanted to get as many units in this development as possible and the short driveway apron is worthless. Commissioner Desai said he was concerned about the legal ramifications of allowing this request and then not allowing it in other neighborhoods. Commissioner Dahm was concerned about the overnight parking and crime statistics. Commissioner Kempe moved to authorize approval of a 1-year pilot project to allow overnight parking as depicted in the attached map on both Hazelwood Street and Legacy Parkway. It is further recommended that after 1 year the staff shall report back to the City Council and make a permanent recommendation based on the lessons learned from the pilot project. March 15, 2016 2 Planning CommissionMeetingMinutes Seconded by Chairperson Arbuckle.Ayes –Chairperson Arbuckle, Commissioner Kempe Nays–Commissioner’s Dahm, Desai, Donofrio & Trippler The motion failed. Commissioner Trippler stated he could not approve this request. He stated he has served on the planning commission since 1998 and served when this original proposal came through the planning commission. At the time the commission was reviewing this proposal he had stated there was not enough parkinghere. The commission was told by city staff that it met the code requirements that the city had at that time and the developer/applicant stated thereis more than adequate parking planned andanyhomeowner that buysa unit here will know the parking situation and what spots are available. He stated he was not the only planning commissioner that voiced their concerns and said it was not a good plan.The developer provided additional parking but didn’t tell potential buyers/owners that you could not use those spots for overnight parking. At that point the city should not have passed the plan, the city should have changed the code to require more parking but instead the city allowed a bad plan and the parking code existed. Even back then it didn’t seem feasible that a unit with 3 and 4 bedrooms would not end up running into parking issues.If you allow theadditional parking to occur here but then get a request from an area that is less wealthy who requests to do the same thing financially they may not be able to afford to do this. The planning commission makes arecommendation or denial to the city council but the city council makes the final decision. Commissioner Kempe statedhe doesn’t believe this has anything to do with wealth or poverty it has to do with the need to add more parking spacesto help with the concerns of the residents living here. Commissioner Dahm stated he wants to make sure the homeowners don’t see this as a dead end because the majority of the commission did not recommend approval of this request. He stated hebelieves there are options within the property to do something. This item goes to the city council on April 11, 2016 for the final decision. 7.UNFINISHEDBUSINESS None. 8.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. 9.COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS a.March 14, 2016 City Council Meeting -Commissioner Kempewas the PC representative and all three items were passed by the city council. Galilee Lutheran Church Community Garden, 1958 Rice Street Wetland Buffer Variance, 2214 Woodlynn Avenue Vacation of a Public Utility and Drainage Easement, 2215 Lydia Avenue 10.STAFFPRESENTATIONS None. March 15, 2016 3 Planning CommissionMeetingMinutes 11.ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Kempeadjourned the meeting at 8:18p.m. March 15, 2016 4 Planning CommissionMeetingMinutes MEMORANDUM TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Economic Development Coordinator DATE: April 13, 2016 SUBJECT: Consider Approval of a Conditional Use Permit Resolution, Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church,1055 Viking Drive Introduction Peter Stalland, on behalf of Tom Hermanson and Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church, is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a church to operate at the building located at 1055 Viking Drive East. The city requires an approved CUP for a church to operatewithin any zoning district. Background September 7, 1972: The city council approved plans for the original building. August 22, 1988: The city council approved a CUP for an addition on the west side of the building. June 8, 1998: the city council approved a CUP allowing the parking lot to be expanded and thereby increasing the amount of impervious surface area to 67 percent of the lot. Discussion Parking The church is proposing a gathering space to accommodate up to400 people. For a church, city ordinance requires one parking space per every four seats – meaning 100 spaces are required. The applicant is proposing to leave the lower lever as office space that will continue to be leased out. The lower lever has 12,750square feet of office space. For office space, city ordinance required one space per every 200 square feet of area – meaning 64 spaces would be required. The site currently has 159 parking spaces and for the two proposed uses 164 are required. The church’s main day of operation will be Sunday and the office space will be mainly used Monday through Friday. Because the uses do not overlap staff is not concerned of a parking shortage. The applicant should be required to submit to staff a seating chart for the main gathering space showing how 400 seats will be accommodated. Staff recommends the CUP for this site limit the gathering space to an occupancy of 400 persons. Site Conditions Before any certificates of occupancy are issued by the city the following items will need to be addressed: The applicant must repair any areas of the parking lot that are currently in disrepair All parking spaces must be clearly striped. All trash and recycling receptacles mustbe screened and may require building an enclosure Department Review Fire Marshall, Butch Gervais – The facility will require fire protection system throughout the entire building with visual and audio notification throughout. The system will be required to be monitored, all work will require permits and completed by a licensed contractor. Building Inspector, Jason Brash – Must build per 2012 IBC, 2012 IMC, 2012 IFGC, 2014 NEC, 2012 UPC Minnesota State Plumbing Code, 2015 Minnesota State Building Code, 1323 Commercial Energy Code, 2012 IECC, 2015 Minnesota State Building Code with ANSI A117. 1- 2009 accessibility rules. City will also require an architectural code analysis for construction, accessibility, and exiting requirements. Staff Engineer, Jon Jarosch – See attached report. Commission Review On April 19, 2016, the planning commission will review theproposed revisions to the conditional use permits for this site. Budget Impact None. Recommendations Adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permitfor Peter Stalland, on behalf of Tom Hermanson and Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church, at1055 Viking Drive. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1.The main gathering space of the church is limited to 400 persons. Applicant shall submit a seating chart to city staff. 2.No exterior site or building exterior changes, except signage, shall take place unless approved by the city. Signs shall follow the city’s sign ordinance. Signs shall not be installed unless the applicant firstobtains sign permits. 3.Any and all trash receptacles shall be contained within an enclosed structure. Any design of a new structure shall be subject to the city’s design review process. 4.The proposed use must be substantially started within one yearof council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 5.The city council shall review this permit in one year. 6.All of the applicant’s parking shall be confined to the site and not allowed on city streets or neighboring properties. 7.City ordinance requires 164 spaces for the useof the building as a church and office space and 159 are being provided. The city approves the waiver of five parking spaces. 8.The city shall monitor any parking complaints and report to the city council about compliance annually during the CUP review. 9.The applicant shall submit a parking restriping plan and maintenance plan for staff approval. 10.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the building official, assistant fire chief and city engineer. Citizen Comments Staffsurveyed the 21property owners within 500 feet of this property for their comments about this proposal. Staff did not receive any comments. Reference Information Site Description Site Size: 2.54 acres Existing Land Use: Office building and former dental lab Surrounding Land Uses North: Single Family Homes South: Highway 36 East: Office and warehouse buildingsplanned Cand zoned M-1 West: Open Space Planning Land Use Plan: C (commercial) Zoning: M-1 (light manufacturing) Application Date The city received a complete CUP application for this request onApril 1, 2016. Minnesota Statutes, Section 15.99 requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving a complete application for a land use proposal. Therefore, city action is required on this request by May 31, 2016. Attachments 1.Location Map 2.Land Use Map 3.Zoning Map 4.Site Map 5.Applicant’s Narrative 6.Engineering Report, Jon Jarosch, dated April 28, 2015 7.Resolution for a Conditional Use PermitRevisionfor a Church Attachment 1 Maplewood Heights Kohlman Lake Hazelwood Sherwood Glen Parkside Western Hills Gladstone Hillside Beaver Lake Battle Creek Vista Hills Highwood Carver Ridge Maplewood, City of Maplewood 1055 Viking Drive - Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i- cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, Conditional Use Permit Review - Overview Map USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, City of Maplewood, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Attachment 2 Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar 1055 Viking Avenue - Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, City of Legend Maplewood, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, MapmyIndia, © Conditional Use Permit - Land Use Map OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Low Density Residential Park Commercial Attachment 3 Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar 1055 Viking Avenue - Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Legend Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, City of Maplewood, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, MapmyIndia, © Conditional Use Permit - Zoning Map OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Light Manufacturing (m1) Single Dwelling (r1) Open Space/Park Attachment 4 Attachment 5 Attachment 5 Attachment 6 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church – 1055 Viking Drive PROJECT NO: 16-05 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Staff Engineer DATE: 4-8-2016 PLAN SET: Conceptual Site Plan Theapplicant is proposing toconvert the interior of the current Hermanson Dental building into a church. No exterior site improvements are proposed at this time. Thefollowing are engineeringreview comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 1)A Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) determination is required for this change in use. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project. -END COMMENTS - Attachment 7 CONDITIONALUSE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Peter Stalland, on behalf of Tom Hermanson and Ebenezer Karen Baptist Church, applied for a conditional use permittooperate a church. WHEREAS, Section 44-1092(3) of the city ordinances requires a conditional use permit for churches and institutions of any educational, philanthropic and charitable nature. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 1055 Viking Drive. The property descriptionis: That part of the West 171.32 feet of the East 662.32 feet of the Southwest 1/4of Section 9, Township 29, Range22 lying Northerly of State Trunk Highway No. 36-118, according to the United States Government Surveythereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The North 180.00 feet of the West 180.8 feet of the East 920.32 feet of the Northeast 1/4of the Southwest 1/4ofSection 9, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. That part of the West 77.20 feet of the East 739.52 feet of the Southwest 1/4of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22,lying Northerly of State Trunk Highway No. 36-118, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the United StatesGovernment Survey thereof. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1.On April 19, 2016, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission also considered the report and recommendation of city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council ______this permit. 2. On May 9, 2016,the city council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council __________ the above-described conditional use permit, because: 1.The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and this Code. 2.The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3.The use would not depreciate property values. 4.The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5.The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street. Attachment 7 6.The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7.The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8.The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. The use would cause no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. 9. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.The main gathering space of the church is limited to 400 persons. Applicant shall submit a seating chart to city staff. 2.No exterior site or building exterior changes, except signage, shall take place unless approved by the city. Signs shall follow the city’s sign ordinance. Signs shall not be installed unless the applicant first obtains sign permits. 3.Any and all trash receptacles shall be contained within an enclosed structure. Any design of a new structure shall be subject to the city’s design review process. 4.The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 5.The city council shall review this permit in one year. 6.All of the applicant’s parking shall be confined to the site and not allowed on city streets or neighboring properties. 7.City ordinance requires 164 spaces for the use of the building as a church and office space and 159 are being provided. The city approves the waiver of five parking spaces. 8.The city shall monitor any parking complaints and report to the city councilabout compliance annually during the CUP review. 9.The applicant shall submit a parking restriping plan and maintenance plan for staff approval. 10.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the building official, assistant fire chief and city engineer. The Maplewood City Council __________ this resolution on May 9, 2016. MEMORANDUM TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Economic Development Coordinator DATE: April 13, 2016 SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Amendments to the Mixed-UseZoning District Introduction The city was recently contactedby Sam Munger, a Hardee’s franchisee who owns most of the locationsin the upper Midwest,andhe has1706 White Bear Avenue under contract with the intention of demolishing the existing building and building a new Hardee’s building.This site is currently zoned mixed-useand prohibits drive-throughs and requires a maximum building setback of 10 feet. The city council reviewed this issue at its April 11 workshop and directed staff to bring this to the planning commission to consider amendments to themixed-use ordinanceto allow a pathway for this type of use yetmaintain thecity council’sability to review for approval. Background September 23, 2002:The city council adopted the Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Plan dated March 15, 2002, and theHillcrest Village Urban Design Standards dated April, 2002.The plan and design standards were based on the Metropolitan Council’s smart-growth development principles, which are designed to help guide changes in an area to create a village center with anactive street life that mixes shops, workplaces, housing, passive recreation, and civic uses. February 23, 2004:The city council adopted the mixed-use zoning district.The purpose of this zoning district is to provide areas in the city with a mixture ofland uses, made mutually compatible through land use controls, and high-quality design standards. February 23, 2004:The city council rezoned areas in the Hillcrest neighborhood from business commercial and single-dwelling residential, to the new mixed-use zoning district. Discussion The Hardee’s proposal wouldbe the first proposed new construction in the Hillcrest neighborhood in several years.There are some initial zoning challenges with this project. In 2004, the city council adopted the mixed-usezoning district for this area which prohibits drive- through and drive-up sales. Setbacks would also require the building to be no more than 10 feet from the front property line. Any changes to theordinance would impact all properties zoned mixed-use–not just 1706 White Bear Avenue, or this neighborhood. Land Use The initial issue that needs to be addressed is the prohibition of drive-throughs in the mixed-use district. Currently, drive-through sales and servicesanddrive-up food or beverage windowsare prohibited. Staff is recommending these two usesbe amended to be allowed via a conditional use permit (CUP) which would have to be approved by the city council. Again this change would apply to all properties zoned mixed-use, which includes the Gladstone neighborhood. One option that was discussed at the city council workshop was to explore creating separate mixed-usezoning districtsfor the Hillcrest and Gladstone neighborhoods. Staff’s recommendation is to keep a single district. The added flexibility of allowing drive-up and –through sales via a CUP has the potential to benefit the Gladstone neighborhood as well. Because of traffic counts and market demand staff is not concerned a chain fast food restaurant would chooseto locate in Gladstone buta small coffee shop might and theadded ability to have a drive-up window might make the use more feasible. Setbacks Themixed-useordinance requires a building setback of 0-10 feet from the front property line. The intent is to have building brought closer to the street to create a village environment that is more walkable. South of Larpenteur Avenue is the city of Saint Paul and those commercial properties also allow a zero-foot setback but do not set a maximum setback. For comparison, the city of Oakdale recently approved a new Hardee’s building within its Tartan Crossing (Hy- Vee) development and a 30-foot setback is required. Other commercial areas in Maplewood require a 30-foot building setback. Staff is recommending the mixed-usedistrict be amended to allow the maximum setback be increased up to100 percent with the approval of a CUP by the city council. In order to approve a CUP the city council must make a determination that the site plan contains elements that meet the intent of the mixed-usedistrict and its setback requirements. So in this case,the maximum 10-footbuilding setback could be increased to 20 feet with CUP approval. Background Below are links to documents that are relevant to this discussion.The first link is for the Hillcrest report thatincludes theadopted redevelopment plan and urban design standards for this neighborhood.The second link is to the actual mixed-usezoning district from the city’s ordinance. Hillcrest Village Opportunity Site –Metropolitan Council Reportdetailing Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Plan and Hillcrest Village Urban Design Standards http://maplewoodmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/15956 Mixed-useZoning District https://www.municode.com/library/mn/maplewood/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_ CH44ZO_ARTIIDIRE_DIV14MIEDI Recommendation Recommend approval of the attached ordinance amendmentsallowing increased building setbacks and the uses of drive-through sales and services and drive-up food or beverage windows with the approval of a conditional use permit. Attachment 1. Ordinance amendments Attachment 1 ORDINANCE NO. ___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENTSTO THE MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRCT The Maplewood City Council approves the following revision to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. (Additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out.) Section 1. Sections 44-680 and 44-681 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances are hereby amended as follows: Sec. 44-680. Uses . Uses allowed within an M-U mixed-use zoning district are as follows: Type of Use Permitted (P) Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Prohibited (PR) Drive-through sales and services (PR) (CUP) Drive-up food or beverage window (PR) (CUP) Sec. 44-681. Dimensional standards. Lot Size Per Unit (square feet)HeightFrontSideRear Building Type 122 Single dwelling7,2603520to 25515 122 Double dwelling/n/a3520to 25515 townhouse Residential garagen/aPer n/a50 to 6 accessed from alleysection 44-114 Residential garage notn/aPer 20to 2555 accessed from alleysection 44-114 Attachment 1 Lot Size Per Unit (square feet)HeightFrontSideRear Building Type 133 Multiple dwellingn/a350 to 2000 33 Mixed-use/residentialn/an/a0 to 1000 and commercial 33 Commercial/includingn/an/a0 to 1000 structure parking No single dwelling, double dwelling, townhouse or multi-dwelling building shall exceed a 1 height of 35 feet, or three stories, unless the city council approves a conditional use permit. 2 When a mixed-use zoned single or double-dwelling/townhouse adjoins a single or double- dwelling residential zoning district, the side and rear yard setbacks of the adjacent single or double-dwelling residential zoning district shall apply, or a side yard setback of ten feet and a rear yard setback of 20 feet, whichever is greater. 3 The zero setback specified above is allowed except as otherwise specified in the building code. Side and rear yard setbacks of at least ten feet shall be required when a mixed-use zoned commercial, mixed-use (residential and commercial) or multi-family use adjoins a mixed-use zoned single or double-dwelling/townhouse residential use. Side and rear yard setbacks shall be as specified in subsection44-20(c)(6)b. (additional design standards) when a mixed-use zoned commercial, mixed-use (residential and commercial), or multi-family use adjoins a single or double-dwelling residential zoning district. 4 The city council may increase maximum setbacks up to100 percent with approval of a conditional use permit. The conditional use permit may only be approved if the applicant has demonstrated on its site plan the intent of the mixed-usezoning district and its setback requirements are being met. Attachment 1 Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the approval by the city council and publishing in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance revision on ___________. _________________ Mayor Attest: ______________________ City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Economic Development Coordinator DATE: April 13, 2016 SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution of Appreciation for Dale Trippler Introduction Dale Tripplerhassubmitted his resignation as a member of the Maplewood Planning Commission. Mr. Trippler recentlymoved awayfromthe city of Maplewood.The city council appointed Mr. Tripplerto the planning commission on June 8, 1998andhe will be serving throughApril 19, 2016. Budget Impact None Recommendation Approve a resolution of appreciation for Planning Commissioner Trippler. Attachment 1.Resolution of Appreciation for Dale Trippler RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS,Dale Tripplerhas been a member of the Maplewood Planning Commission since June 8, 1998 and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissionhas appreciated Mr. Trippler’s experience, insights and good judgment; and WHEREAS, Mr. Tripplerhas freelygiven of histime and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, Mr. Tripplerhas shown sincerededication to hisduties and has consistently contributed hisleadership, timeand effort for the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens that Dale Trippleris hereby extended our gratitude and appreciation for hisdedicated service. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on ___________, 2016 ____________________________________ Nora Slawik, Mayor Passed by the Maplewood Planning Commission OnApril 19, 2016 ____________________________________ Paul Arbuckle , Chairperson Attest: ________________________________ Karen Haag, City Clerk