HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 07-13 City Council Workshop PacketPPLLEEAASSEE NNOOTTEE SSTTAARRTT TTIIMMEE IISS 55::3300 PPMM
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
MANAGER WORKSHOP
5:30 P.M. Monday, July 13 2015
City Hall, Council Chambers
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Presentation on City Employee Wellness Program
2. 2016 -2020 CIP Discussion/Review, Continued
3. Strategic Objectives, Continued
F. ADJOURNMENT
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager
FROM: Mike Funk, Assistant City Manager/HR Director
Sarah Burlingame, HR Assistant
DATE: July 8th, 2015
SUBJECT: Presentation on City Employee Wellness Program
Introduction & Background
The purpose of this presentation is to provide an update regarding the City Employee Wellness
program. The current program, called “Work on Wellness”, was launched December 1, 2010.
Sarah Burlingame, HR Assistant, will lead the presentation and provide the council with an
update of the program from where it began to its current status.
Budget Impact
There is no budgetary impact projected for this discussion.
Recommendation
No action needed.
Attachments
None. Presentation at meeting
E1
Workshop Packet Page Number 1 of 12
E2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager
FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
DATE: June 23, 2015
SUBJECT: 2016-2020 CIP Discussion/Review
Introduction
The Capital Improvement Plan is an annually prepared document that coordinates the planning,
financing and timing of major equipment purchases and construction projects. The 2016-2020
CIP document is being released for review by the various Commissions and a Public Hearing on
the CIP will be held at the Planning Commission meeting on July 7th at 7:00 pm. As part of our
paperless efforts, a copy of the CIP is available in electronic format on the City’s webpage.
Following the receipt of recommendations from all the Commissions, the City Council will be
asked to adopt the CIP at the July 27th City Council meeting. Adopting the CIP does not commit
the council to the proposed projects, nor implement the assumptions made during the
preparation; however, this is the basis for the 2016 Budget as we continue with its preparation.
Background
The Transmittal Letter highlights the major projects within the Plan for consideration. The
document explains each of the proposed projects, as well as analyzes the impacts on the
budget for the various funds, along with the tax impact necessary to implement these projects
as proposed. The staff submits projects based upon goals set at the Council/Management
Team retreats. The finance staff analyzes the funds available for capital projects along with the
impacts of the staff proposals. A number of revisions are made in the project submittals based
upon the analysis of finance, as well as management priorities to achieve the attached CIP plan.
The attached table shows the changes that were made to the original requests based on the
City’s financial means and meetings with the various department heads.
There is a fairly significant decrease in the cost of projects included in the 2016-2020 CIP
compared to previous years. The proposed 2016-2020 CIP contains $35.2 million in
expenditures while the 2015-2019 CIP contained $48.2 million (a 27% decrease). The main
reason for this decrease is that projects related to the Parks System Master Plan, the Asset
Management Plan and the Gas Franchise Fee are not included in this document. The idea is
that these types of projects will have little, if any, effect on other city funds or the 2016 tax levy.
The only impact should be to the tax levy in 2017 and beyond. Staff is exploring using
Abatement Bonds to help fund projects in the Parks System Master Plan, using CIP Bonds to
help fund projects in the Asset Management Plan and still working through the implementation
of the Gas Franchise Fee. Information on these projects will be available later this year. The
projects that could possibly have an effect on 2016 operations or tax levy are included in the
2016-2020 CIP document.
Recommendation
No action required at this time. This item is for discussion only.
Workshop Packet Page Number 2 of 12
E2
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
TOTAL
ORIGINAL REQUEST 5/21/15 7,669,870 10,373,260 10,305,590 19,119,520 9,879,980
57,348,220
ADDITIONS
Pond/Dorland area streets 80,000 2,420,000
2,500,000 Replacement project for Lakewood/Sterling
Franchise fee projects 60,000 1,250,000 1,010,000 1,780,000 1,050,000
5,150,000
MOVE/CHANGE/DELETE
Records Management
(5,000) (10,000) (15,000) (20,000)
(50,000)
Reduce amount set aside for future
replacement
Replace Rehab/Air Truck
(300,000) 300,000
0 Move from 2018 to 2019
Server storage
(60,000) 60,000
0 Move from 2019 to 2020
Farrell/Ferndale area streets
(100,000) 0 (7,460,000) 7,560,000
0 Move from 2019 to 2020
Park Upgrades to Existing Parks (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000)
(250,000)
Keep at $100,000 per year - roll into
Abatement bond?
Lift station upgrade program 40,000 (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (25,000)
0 Department change
Replacement of Police/Fire 800 MHz radios (296,250) (296,250) (296,250) (296,250) 35,000
(1,150,000) replace small amount each year ($35,000)
Lakewood/Sterling area streets 990,000 (3,180,000)
(2,190,000)
Franchise fee project - not full
reconstruction
DECLINE (to future years)
Dennis/McClelland area streets
(100,000) (100,000) (6,760,000)
(6,960,000) Move from 2020 to 2022
Veteran's Memorial Park (150,000) (450,000) (850,000) (750,000) (200,000)
(2,400,000) Deal with higher priority items first
Asset Management Software (115,000)
(115,000) Delay till funds are available
Regional Police Firearms Range (25,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
(425,000)
Future of JPA uncertain - wait for more
information
EAB Ash Removal and Planting (100,000) (100,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000)
(650,000) Look at other options
REMOVE THE FOLLOWING - SEPARATE PLANS
Projects related to Parks System Master Plan (580,000) (350,000) (350,000) (390,000) (350,000)
(2,020,000) Sidewalk and Trail Improvements
Projects related to Parks System Master Plan (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000)
(5,000,000) Park Maintenance & Reinvestment
Projects related to Franchise Fee (1,150,000) (1,250,000) (1,010,000) (1,780,000) (1,050,000)
(6,240,000) Street Projects
Projects related to Asset Management Plan (320,000) (320,000) (320,000) (1,070,000) (320,000)
(2,350,000) Building Maintenance & Reinvestment
UPDATED REQUEST 5,053,620 6,837,010 6,774,340 7,973,270 8,559,980
35,198,220
Workshop Packet Page Number 3 of 12
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Melinda Coleman, City Manager
Mike Funk, Assistant City Manager, HR Director
DATE: July 8th, 2015
SUBJECT: Review Strategic Priorities and Key Outcome Indicators
Introduction
The purpose of this discussion is to review “Financial Sustainability”, with is one (1) of the five
(5) Strategic Priorities and Key Outcome Indicators (KOI) that were established at the retreat
held on May 4th. If time allows, “Coordinated Communication” will also be discussed.
The process recommended is to discuss one to two strategic priorities in the upcoming Manager
Workshops; until all five (5) strategic priorities are discussed and the City Council is prepared to
adopt the plan.
Background
Staff presented the five (5) strategic priorities and Key Outcome Indicators at the June 22, 2015,
Manager’s Workshop. It is recognized this document is significant in that it establishes a
strategic focus for the future of the community; therefore the City Council directed staff to bring
this item back for further discussion.
Budget Impact
There is no estimated budgetary impact projected for this discussion.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the city council review and provide direction.
Attachments
1. Strategic Plan Summary 2016-2017 (original as prepared by Mr. Rapp)
2. Strategic Plan Monitoring 2016-2017 (recommended by staff)
E3
Workshop Packet Page Number 4 of 12
City of Maplewood- Strategic Plan Summary 2016-17
Strategic Priority Key Outcome
Indicator (KOI)
Target Strategic
Initiatives/Action
Plans
Financial
Sustainability
Reserve funding-facilities
and equipment
All critical items identified
in asset mgmt. plan
funded in 3 yrs
TBD
General Fund reserves 40% of Gen. Fund
operating revenues
Budget Positive change to net
assets-all govt’l funds-
excluding future bonded
items
Coordinated
Communication
Citizen engagement 3 new engagement tools
implemented
Communication Determination made
regarding most effective
modalities
Feedback from diverse
communities
--Most effective methods
for feedback determined
--One new approach
implemented
Effective
Governance
Decisions 80% of goals
accomplished yearly
TBD Council meeting
decorum
90% compliance w/ rules
of decorum/group charter
Survey results __% rate good/excellent
customer service
Targeted
Redevelopment
Gladstone area
redevelopment
--3 parcels Maplewood
Bowl completed
--Partnerships in place-
trailer park
--50% agree to relocation-
auto repair
TBD
Vacant commercial space 50% of sq. ft. back in
productive use
Century Ave. corridor Shared vision w/Oakdale,
Ramsey & Washington
counties and stakeholders
(prior to infrastructure)
Operational
Effectiveness
Performance measures Five core effectiveness
measures-all departments
TBD Collaboration/shared
services
Two new executed
service agreements-one
internal, one external
Survey results 80% or greater favorable
rating on service delivery
E3, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 5 of 12
Key Outcome
Indicator (KOI)
Reserve funding-facilities and
equipment
All critical items identified in asset
mgmt. plan funded in 3 yrs
General Fund reserves 40% of Gen. Fund operating revenues
Budget Positive change to net assets-all govt’l
funds-excluding future bonded items
Citizen engagement 3 new engagement tools
implemented
Communication Determination made regarding most
effective modalities
--Most effective methods for
feedback determined
--One new approach implemented
Council meeting decorum 90% compliance w/ rules of group
charter
Advisory Boards/Commissions Create annual initiatives/work plans
to support city 's strategic plan
--3 parcels Maplewood Bowl
completed
--Partnerships in place-trailer park
--50% agree to relocation-auto repair
Vacant commercial space 50% of sq. ft. back in productive use
Century Ave. corridor
Shared vision w/Oakdale, Ramsey &
Washington counties and
stakeholders (prior to infrastructure)
Performance measures Five core effectiveness measures-all
departments
Collaboration/shared services
Two new executed service
agreements-one internal, one
external
Survey results 80% or greater favorable rating on
service delivery
Operational
Effectiveness
Comments
Gladstone area redevelopment
Financial
Sustainability
Coordinated
Communication
Effective
Governance
Targeted
Redevelopment
Strategic Priority Target Status
(0,1,3)
Feedback from diverse
communities
Decisions/Strategic Plan 80% of goals accomplished yearly
E3, Attachment 1
Workshop Packet Page Number 6 of 12
Key Outcome Indicator: Reserve Funding- Facilities and Equipment
Target: All critical items identified in asset management plan are funded in 3 years
Strategic Initiatives/Action Plans Who's
Responsible Start Date Status
(0,1,2)Measure of Success/Comments:
Review all currently critical items and
determine if they are operational or
capital in nature.
Building
Maintenance Now
Listing of items needed to be included in Building Maintenance
operational duties and listing of items needing capital financing.
Establish plan for dealing with
operational items.
Building
Maintenance
List of operational items needing attention continues to shrink. Deal
with items more pro-actively in the future.
Determine financing sources for capital
items.Finance
Currently critical capital items are no longer deferred.
Establish an on-going tax levy to build up
a replacement fund reserve.Finance
An ongoing source of funding is available to handle capital
maintenance items. No longer defer the work.
Strategic Priority: Financial Stability
E3, Attachment 2
Workshop Packet Page Number 7 of 12
Key Outcome Indicator: General Fund Reserves
Target: Maintain a minimum balance of 40% gerenal fund operating revenues
Strategic Initiatives/Action Plans Who's
Responsible Start Date Status
(0,1,2)Measure of Success/Comments:
Diversify revenues (i.e. new gas franchise
fee)Finance
Reduced reliance on property taxes and state LGA funding.
Annual budget preparation.Finance
Establish a balanced budget each year.
Evaluate the efficiency and effictiveness
of city services.
Finance/Adminis
tration
Determine which services the city should be offering and restructure
others based on data driven decisions.
Grant revenue.All departments
Actively look to secure grant funding when possible.
Set appropriate fees to recover cost of
services.All departments
Make sure we are covering the cost of providing services. Relates
back to using data to support decisions on services.
Share information with City Council and
Department Heads.Finance
Council and departments have up-to-date information to make
informed decisions.
Keep expenditures within approved
budgets.All departments
Projects come in on or under approved budgets.
Strategic Priority: Financial Stability
E3, Attachment 2
Workshop Packet Page Number 8 of 12
Key Outcome Indicator: Budget
Target: Positive change to net assets- all governmental funds- excluding future bonded items
Strategic Initiatives/Action Plans Who's
Responsible Start Date Status
(0,1,2)Measure of Success/Comments:
Manage project budgets.All departments
Projects are approved only if funds are available and all projects come
in on or under approved budgets.
Look at best us of LGA funding.Finance
LGA funding is only used for capital projects or debt service. History
has showed us that this is not a secure source of financing and should
not be used for operations.
Maintain or improve our bond rating.Finance
A higher bond rating keeps our borrowing interest rates low.
Strategic Priority: Financial Stability
E3, Attachment 2
Workshop Packet Page Number 9 of 12
Key Outcome Indicator: Citizen Engagement
Target: 3 new engagment tools implented
Strategic Initiatives/Action Plans Who's
Responsible Start Date Status
(0,1,2)Measure of Success/Comments:
Continue to utilize MySidewalk (formerly
MindMixer) always having at least 2
topics posted
Comm/All Dept 7/1/2015
Ensure we always have at least 2 topics posted at any one time. Use
trends of participation for types of questions/topics to better craft
future topics.
Create Social Media plan for the City.Comm/All Dept 1/1/2016
Plan is created with feedback from all Depts and success is achieved
when the City, as a whole, has made all required changes to accounts,
posting guidelines, etc.
Create Fix-it form and make available on
website for citizens to submit work
tickets to the City.
IT 9/1/2015
Ensure fix-it form is available and all requests are routed to the
appropriate parties. Market fix-it form in City News, etc.
Implemenet system to allow for online
job application submissions.IT/HR 9/1/2015
Ensure system is up and running. Post all job applications via this tool.
Measure time savings and # of applicants.
Hold City photo contest for a variety of
categories.Comm 5/1/2016
Number of entries received.
Strategic Priority: Coordinated Communication
E3, Attachment 2
Workshop Packet Page Number 10 of 12
Key Outcome Indicator: Communication
Target: Determination made regarding most effective modalities
Strategic Initiatives/Action Plans Who's
Responsible Start Date Status
(0,1,2)Measure of Success/Comments:
Survey our residents on how they would
like to receive communications from the
City.
Comm/CM 1/1/2016
Success will be achieved if we have survey results that reflect our City
as a whole (statistically accurate) that we can then use in creating our
Communications Strategy.
Create a Communications Strategy for
City Departments to implement Comm 4/1/2016
A plan that is easily implementable has been created and Departments
are being trained on how to use it correctly.
All departments actively participating in
the City's Communications Strategy.All Depts 7/1/2016
Show that all departments have bought in to the Communications
Strategy with examples of their posts, articles, etc.
Strategic Priority: Coordinated Communication
E3, Attachment 2
Workshop Packet Page Number 11 of 12
Key Outcome Indicator: Feedback from Diverse Communities
Target: Most effective methods for feedback determined & one new approach implemented
Strategic Initiatives/Action Plans Who's
Responsible Start Date Status
(0,1,2)Measure of Success/Comments:
Study diverse communities that the City
would like to target communication to.
(Who)(Most needed in our Community)
Comm 7/1/2016
A report is created based on the study that lists how we've came to
this recommendation and what that recommendation is. Essentially
telling us where we should start.Create list of City
documents/communications that we will
make available in the languages we
decided upon in the first item
Comm 9/1/2016
A list is created of the top 30 most used forms/communications that
will ultimately be created in the language decided upon in the item
above
Translate forms/communications listed in
item above to different languages.Comm/All Dept 10/1/2016
Forms have been created and are available in physical and electronic
format for staff use.
Any postings to our official City
Newspaper also posted in local diverse
newspapers
Comm/All Dept 9/1/2016
All postings to official newspaper also shown to be posted in other
approved newspapers.
Strategic Priority: Coordinated Communication
E3, Attachment 2
Workshop Packet Page Number 12 of 12