Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-05-27 CDRB Packet
AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Wednesday, May 27, 2015 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers - Maplewood City Hall 1830 County Road B East 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes: a. March 24, 2015 5. New Business: 6. Design Review: a. Approval of Design Review, Kline Volvo Expansion, 3040 Maplewood Drive b. Approval of Design Review, Beam Avenue Medical Building, Northeast of Beam and White Bear avenues, between Walgreens and Maplewood Heights Park 7. Visitor Presentations: 8. Board Presentations: 9. Staff Presentations: 10. Adjourn MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2015 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Ledvina called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Absent Boardmember, Leo Burger Boardmember, Bill Kempe Present Absent Boardmember, Jason Lamers Chairperson, Matt Ledvina Present Boardmember, Ananth Shankar Present Staff Present: Michael Martin, Planner 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Staff requested removing agenda item 6 c. Approval of Design Review of a Telecommunications Tower, Harmony Learning Center, 1961 County Road C East due to the applicant withdrawing the application. Boardmember Kempe moved to approve the agenda as amended. Seconded by Boardmember Shankar. Ayes - All The motion passed. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Boardmember Kempe moved to approve the February 24, 2015, CDRB minutes as submitted. Seconded by Chairperson Ledvina. Ayes – Chairperson Ledvina & Boardmember Kempe Abstention – Boardmember Shankar The motion passed. 5. NEW BUSINESS None. 6. DESIGN REVIEW a. Approval of Design Plans, Porsche Remodel, 2780 Maplewood Drive i. Planner, Mike Martin gave the report for Maplewood Imports for the Porsche remodel and answered questions of the board. March 24, 2015 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 1 ii. Architect, Nguyen Hoang, Baker Associates Inc., 150 Fifth Street South, Ste. 1425, Minneapolis, addressed and answered questions of the board. iii. General Manager of Porsche St. Paul, Doug Molder, addressed and answered questions of the board. Boardmember Shankar moved to approve the plans date-stamped March 6, 2015, for the proposed building addition at 2780 Maplewood Drive. Approval is subject to the following (changes or additions are in bold and underlined). conditions: 1. Approval of design plans is good for two years. If the applicant has not begun construction within two years, this design review shall be repeated. Staff may approve minor changes. 2. The applicant’s proposed addition shall not be any closer to the front property line, the Highway 61 (Maplewood Drive) right-of-way, than the setback established by the existing building. 3. Satisfy the requirements set forth in the staff report authored by staff engineer Jon Jarosch, dated February 26, 2015. 4. The applicant shall screen the roof top units from the view of Highway 61 (Maplewood Drive). Seconded by Boardmember Kempe. Ayes – All The motion passed. b. Approval of Design Review, Villages at Frost-English, 1955 English Street North i. Planner, Mike Martin gave the report on the Villages at Frost-English and answered questions of the board. ii. Shane LaFave, Sherman Associates, 233 Park Avenue South, Minneapolis, addressed the board. iii. Architect, Link Wilson, Kaas Wilson Architects, 1301 American Blvd. E., Ste. 100, Bloomington, gave a presentation for the proposal and answered question of the board. iv. Planning Commissioner, Dale Trippler addressed the board as a member of the Gladstone Neighborhood Task Force and the Planning Commission. Boardmember Kempe moved to approve the design plans for the 50-unit multi-family building and the site plan for the Villages at Frost-English, date-stamped February 23, 2015, for the redevelopment project located at 1955 English Avenue. Approval is subject to the applicant (changes or additions are in bold and underlined). doing the following: a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. b. Satisfy the requirements set forth in the staff report authored by staff Engineer Jon Jarosch, dated February 26, 2015. c. Satisfy the requirements set forth in the staff report authored by Environmental Planner, Shann Finwall, dated March 2, 2015. d. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant must submit to staff for approval the following items: March 24, 2015 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 2 1. Verification of The Villages at Frost-English lot division has been recorded. 2. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall comply with all requirements as specified in the city engineering department’s February 26, 2015, review. 3. The applicant shall submit to staff for approval a revised landscape plan showing the following details: a. Addition of at least two trees to be installed by the applicant in or near the English Street right-of-way to replace the two trees removed with the construction of the driveway. b. Landscape requirements per the Mixed-Use Zoning District including: i. Landscape Islands: 1. One overstory tree with a trunk size a minimum of two-and-one-half inches in caliper shall be provided for every landscape island. 2. A minimum of 50 percent of every landscape island shall be planted with an approved ground cover in the appropriate density to achieve complete cover within two years. Mulch may only be used around the base of the plant material to retain moisture. ii. Perimeter Parking Lot Landscaping: 1. The primary plant materials used in perimeter parking lot landscaping adjacent the road shall be over story trees. Ornamental trees, shrubs, hedges and other plant materials may be used to supplement the over story trees, but shall not be the sole contribution to such landscaping. iii. Overstory trees are required at regular intervals along the road to help define the road edge, to buffer pedestrians from vehicles and to provide shade. The overstory trees shall be located in a planting strip at least five feet wide between curb and sidewalk, or in a planting structure of design acceptable to the city. 4. Enter into a developer’s agreement with the city which will cover the installation of all public improvements surrounding and within the property. 5. Sign a maintenance agreement for the ongoing maintenance of all required rainwater gardens and infiltration basins. 6. A cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. 7. Revise the Frost Avenue building elevation stepping the fourth floor back from the rest of the building. 8. Revise the photometric plan showing code compliance and height of all light fixtures. March 24, 2015 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 3 e. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: 1. Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. 2. Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. 3. Install all required landscaping and in-ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas. 4. Install all required outdoor lighting. 5. Install all required sidewalks and trails. f. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: 1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. 2) The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 of the following year if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. g. The buildings for Phases Two and Three of the Villages at Frost-English development are required to be reviewed for design review by the community design review board. h. All work shall follow the approved plans. City staff may approve minor changes. i. Approving the Frost Avenue building elevation submitted at the March 24, 2015 CDRB meeting that are date-stamped March 24, 2015. j. The J supports of the decks along Frost Avenue shall be screened by a masonry wall. Seconded by Boardmember Kempe. Ayes – Chairperson Ledvina, & Boardmember Kempe Nay – Boardmember Shankar The motion passed. Boardmember Shankar said he would like to express why he voted nay. Boardmember Shankar said he respects the hard work done by members of the Gladstone Task Force but he said he sees the 8 inches setback as tokenism and the original design reading as a four story building and the new design as a three story building so in that regard he doesn’t want to compromise his principles on the setback here. This item goes to the city council on April 13, 2015. Boardmember Kempe said he will be present representing the planning commission so he will also represent the CDRB as well. March 24, 2015 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 4 c. Approval of Design Review of a Telecommunications Tower, Harmony Learning Center, 1961 County Road C East – (CANCELLED FROM AGENDA) 9. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. 10. BOARD PRESENTATIONS a. Election of Officers i. Planner, Michael Martin stated the board is required to vote for a Chair and Vice Chairperson for 2015. Chairperson Ledvina moved to nominate Boardmember Kempe as the 2015 Chairperson of the CDRB. Chairperson Ledvina moved to nominated himself to serve as the Vice Chairperson of the CDRB for 2015. Seconded by Boardmember Shankar. Ayes – All The motion passed. 11. STAFF PRESENTATIONS None. 12. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Chairperson Ledvina at 7:28 p.m. March 24, 2015 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 5 MEMORANDUM TO:Melinda Coleman, City Manager FROM:Chris Swanson, Environmental and City Code Specialist DATE:May 15, 2015 SUBJECT:Approval of Design Review,Kline Volvo Expansion, 3040 Maplewood Drive Introduction Mr. Andy Nelson, representing Kline Volvo at 3040Maplewood Drive, is requesting approval to demolish the existing storefront glass and frames and remove existing stone façade. The applicant is also requesting to expand the showroomin the southwest corner of the building by 948square feet. Background September 20, 1999: The planning commission recommended that the city council deny the wetland setback variance and conditional use permit. September 21, 1999: The community design review boardrecommended that the city council approve the site,landscaping and architectural plans. October 11, 1999. The city council approved conditional use permit, wetland buffer variance and design review. Discussion Building Design The applicant is proposing to install Volvo Silveraluminum composite materialpanels andblue etched glass on the outside of the building. The applicant is also requesting to expand the showroomin the southwest corner of the building by 948 square feet.The building addition will not encroach any closer to the front property line than the existing showroom. Site Design The applicant is proposing to add an additional feature display pad on the Southwest corner of the lot andoff the northwest corner of the building. The pad will be similar in design to the existing display pad on the north side of the property. Recommendation Approve the plans date-stamped May13, 2015for the proposedbuilding additionat 3040 MaplewoodDrive.Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Approval of design plans is good for two years.If the applicant has not begun constructionwithin two years, this design review shall be repeated. Staff may approve minor changes. 2.Theapplicant’s proposed addition shall not be any closer to the front property line, the Highway 61 (Maplewood Drive) right-of-way,than the setback established by the existing building. 3.The proposed improvements require the submittal of a parking lot paving permit. An erosion control plan is also required, depicting how the neighboring wetlands will be protected throughout construction. 4.The applicant must pull all required permits before starting work. Any new signage has not been approved. Sign permits are required. Reference Information Site Description Site size: 2.32acres Existingland use: Kline Volvo Surrounding Land Uses North: Wetland and Kline Nissan South: Lexus of Maplewood West: Highway 61 (Maplewood Drive) East: Wetland Planning Land Use Plan designation: C (commercial);Zoning: L1 (Light manufacturing) Application Date The application for this request was considered complete on May13, 2015.State law requires that the city decide on these applications within 60 days. The deadline for city council action on this proposal is July 11, 2015. Attachments 1.OverviewMap 2.Land Use Map 3.Zoning Map 4.Site Plan 5.Building Design 6.Plans date-stamped March 13, 2015(separate attachment) Maplewood Heights Kohlman Lake Hazelwood Sherwood Glen Parkside Western Hills Gladstone Hillside Beaver Lake Battle Creek Vista Hills Highwood Carver Ridge Maplewood, City of Maplewood 3040 Maplewood Drive - Volvo Remodel Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i- Design Review - Overview Map cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Attachment 2 Legend 3040 Maplewood Drive - Volvo Remodel Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographi CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomT Design Review - Land Use Map Commercial MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user commu Open Space Attachment 3 Legend 3040 Maplewood Drive - Volvo Remodel Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographi CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomT Design Review - Zoning Map Light Manufacturing (m1) MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user commu Attachment 4 Attachment 5 MEMORANDUM TO: Melinda Coleman, City Manager, FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Planner DATE: May 19, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Design Review, Beam Avenue Medical Building, Northeast of Beam and White Bear avenues, between Walgreens and Maplewood Heights Park Introduction Project Description Dan Regan, of Launch Properties,is proposing to construct a 13,882-square-foot medical buildingon a vacant lot located northeast of the Beam and White Bear avenues intersection, east of Walgreens and westof Maplewood Heights Park.The proposed medical building will house PrairieCare. As part of this proposal, Mr. Regan has negotiatedwith the parks department to share parkingfacilities and to utilize some of the park land for the parking lot. A similar arrangement had been approved in 2011 for a previously proposed medical building which was never built. The requirements outlined in the city’s parking requirements make it impossible for the applicant to fit everything within his site, thus the negotiations with the city’s parks department. The property is guided in the city’s comprehensive plan as Commercial (C) and zoned as Limited Business Commercial (LBC), which allows for offices, medical or health-related clinics, day care centers, or similar uses. Requests To build this development, the applicant isrequesting the following city approvals: 1.Design plans Background December 11, 2006:The city council approved a lot division to split this site from the Walgreens to the west. September 26, 2011: The city council approved design plans, a public vacation and a reciprocal easement agreement. Because more than two years have lapsed the design approval is not valid anymore, but the public vacation is a permanent approval and still valid. The city council will be considering a revised reciprocal easement agreement as negotiated by the parks department. 1 Discussion Design Review Curb Cuts/Driveways The current site does not have a curb cut. The parking lot serving Maplewood Heights Parkdoes have a curb cut. The proposed site plan will have one curb cut off of Beam Avenue with the park and medical buildings sharing parking facilities. The city and Mr. Regan will need to execute an easement agreement outlining the terms of the shared access and parking facilities. There will be an additional access point fromthe access road on the Walgreens property. Sidewalksand Trails There is an existing six-foot-wide concrete sidewalk located along BeamAvenue. There will be an internal concrete sidewalk to serve the building. There will also be a five-foot- wide concretetrail on the east side of the site connecting the sidewalk along Beam Avenue and the parking lot to the ring trail around the pond within Maplewood Heights Park. There is a proposed retaining wall on the east side of the site which will work to keep the grades of the trails and sidewalks accessible. For retaining walls more than four feet in height a fence on the top is required by building code. Staff is recommending a fence be installed on top of the retaining wall regardless of the final height because of the proximity of the nearby tennis and basketball courts. Site Layout The building and parking lot meet or exceed required setbacks of 30 feet and 15 feet to the right-of-wayrespectively.The proposed drive aisle through the parking lot meets the city minimum requirement of 24 feet. There is a small portion of unused right-of-way between the applicant’s parcel and the city park parcel that wasvacatedin 2011. Parking City code requires medical office buildings to have one parking stall per 200 square feet of office space. The proposeddevelopment requires 70parking stalls based on this requirement. The applicants are proposing 70parking stalls, which includeseight handicap accessible stalls. The parking stalls will be 9.5feet wide by 18 feet deep, which meets city code requirement for a medical office (lowturnover) use.In addition to the 70 stalls for the medical building, four stalls are proposed to beexcusive for the park. These stalls will have signs indicating for park use only. The current park parking lot has 10stalls but the city’s parks department staff is comfortable with having four stalls exclusively assigned to the park because of the amount of street parking nearby and the ability for park goers to use other parking spaces at the medical building during non- business hours. The official shared parking agreement between the city and Mr. Regan will be memorialized through aneasement agreement. Landscaping The landscape plan shows 25trees, including 13 overstory deciduous trees, and various shrubs.The plan reflects trees being planted every 30 feet along Beam Avenue, which 2 was a requirement of the 2011 approval. The plan also calls out underground irrigation for all landscaping as required by code. Staff is comfortable with the layout and design of the internal site landscaping. Lighting City code requires the submittal of a lighting and photometrics plan which ensures all freestanding lights maintain a height of 25 feet or less and that the maximum foot candles of illumination at all property lines doesnot exceed .4-foot-candles. The submitted photometrics plan shows the applicant exceed the .4-foot-candles code requirement. The applicant shall resubmit a plan that meets code requirements. Trash Handling The applicant has indicated all trash facilities will be located within the building. If at any time trash facilities are located outside of the buildingitwill need to be located within an enclosed structure which must be approved by the city. Building Elevations The exterior of the building will be constructed with face brick, EIFS and clear anodized aluminum windows. The building elevations also propose a 18’8”-foot-high entryway with precast architectural panels. Staff finds the proposed buildings elevations to be an attractive design. DepartmentComments Fire Department: Butch Gervais, fire marshal, reviewed the development proposal and has the following comments: Must comply with all fire codes, installing fire protection, system monitoring and notification inside the building. Fire department key box order form provided by Fire Marshal. Engineering Department: Jon Jarosch, staff engineer, has reviewed this project. Mr. Jarosch’scomments and requirements are attached to this report. Recommendations 1. Approve the site and design plans, date-stamped May 13, 2015,for the medical office buildingto be located northeast of the Beam and White Bear avenues intersection, east of the Walgreens. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: a.Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. b.Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, theapplicant must submit to staff for approval the following items: 3 1)Revised grading/landscaping/drainage/utility plans which comply with all city engineering department requirements as specified in the May 20, 2015engineering report. 2)Revised photometric plan meeting code requirements. 3) Any needed watershed district approval. 4) A cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. 5) Submit to community development staff, an approved easement agreement between the applicant and the city outlining the use and maintenance of city park land and the shared parking lot. 6) The 2011 city councilapproved vacation of the unused right-of- way between theapplicant’s parcel and the city park parcelmust be recorded with Ramsey County. 7) Revise the site plan to extend the sidewalk to access the road and explore the potential of cross stripping for pedestrian access to Walgreens, subject to staff approval. c. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building: 1)Replace any property irons removed because of this construction. 2)Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and driveways. 3) Install all required landscaping and underground irrigation. 4)Screen or paint the rooftop mechanical equipment to match the building color. All rooftop equipment shall be screen from the residential properties to the north and south. 5)Install allrequired outdoor lighting. 6)Install fencing along any retaining walls built as part of this project, subject to staff approval. d. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: 1)The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. 2)The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior 4 improvements by June 1 if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. e. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. Authorize the City Manager toenter into a Reciprocal Easement Agreement with LauchProperties at Maplewood Heights Park for the use of 7,500 square feet of park land for a shared parking lot. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: a.The City will receive a full PAC contribution from the project. b.The City will receive site improvements related to the parking area trail and parking lot. c. Fourexclusive use spots for park patrons, to be indicated by a permanent sign. d. Trail relocation, as agreed upon with parks department staff. e. Improvements made by the developer to city parks, not to exceed $20,000, this can also be paid as an additional PAC fee. f. Developer agreesto provide year round maintenance of the proposed parking lot and allow the City access to all of the additional parking stalls. Reference Information Site Description Site size: 1.23Acres Existing Use: Vacant Land Surrounding Uses North: Maplewood Heights Park South: Beam Avenue and Premier Bank across the street (Zoned LBC) East: Maplewood Heights Park West: Walgreens(Zoned BC) Planning Future Land Use Commercial (C) Zoning: Limited Business Commercial (LBC) 5 Application Date The application for this request was considered complete on May 13, 2015. State law requires that the city decide on these applications within 60 days. The deadline for city council action on this proposal is July 11, 2015. Attachments 1.Location Map 2.Land Use Map 3.Zoning Map 4.Applicants’ Development Statement 5.Site Plan 6.Building Elevations 7.Engineering Plan Review, Dated May 19, 2015 8.City Council Minutes, September 26, 2011 9.Plans date-stamped May13, 2015 (separate attachment) 6 Attachment 1 Maplewood Heights Kohlman Lake Hazelwood Sherwood Glen Parkside Western Hills Gladstone Hillside Beaver Lake Battle Creek Vista Hills Highwood Carver Ridge Maplewood, City of Maplewood 2001 Beam Avenue - Medical Office Building Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i- Design Review - Overview Map cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community 7 Attachment 2 Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthsta 2001 Beam Avenue - Medical Office Building Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Legend Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, DeLorme, TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and t Design Review - Land Use Map Low Density Residential Commercial GIS user community High Density ResidentialPark 8 Attachment 3 Maplewood, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthsta 2001 Beam Avenue - Medical Office Building Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Legend Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, Esri, DeLorme, TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and t Design Review - Zoning Map Limited Business Commercial (lbc) Open Space/Park GIS user community Single Dwelling (r1) Business Commercial Modified (bcm) Double Dwelling (r2) Business Commercial (bc) Planned Unit Development (pud) 9 Attachment 4 10 Attachment 5 11 Attachment 6 12 Attachment 7 Engineering Plan Review PROJECT: PrairieCare Medical Office Building PROJECT NO: 15-08 COMMENTS BY: Jon Jarosch, P.E. – Staff Engineer DATE: 5-19-2015 PLAN SET: Engineering plans dated 5-5-2015 REPORTS: Storm Water Management Report – Dated 5-4-2015 The applicant is proposing a new medical office building on the currently vacant property at 2001 Beam Avenue. The applicant is requesting a review of the current design. As the amount of disturbance on this site is greater than 0.5 acre, the applicantis requiredto meet the City’s stormwater quality, rate control, and other stormwater management requirements.The submitted stormwater management plan depicts the project meetingthe City’s requirements as it pertains to infiltration and rate control. This review does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents for final review.Thefollowing are engineeringreview comments on the design and act as conditions prior to issuing permits. Drainage and Stormwater Management 1)The project shall be submitted to the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) for review. All conditions of RWMWD shall be met. 2)The applicantis proposingthe use ofinfiltrationto meet water quality requirements.As such, the applicant shall submit copies of geotechnical information (soil borings, infiltrations tests, etc.) to support the infiltration rates shown in the hydraulic calculations. 3)The infiltration rateutilized for the underground infiltration system in the storm-water management report is 0.05 inches per hour and is inadequate to meet the 48-hour drawdown requirement. The applicant shall verify that the infiltration rate utilized is correct. It may be necessary to adjust the design to ensure draw down within a 48 hour timeframe. It should be noted that the maximum depth allowed for infiltration practices is 2-feet. 4)The applicant shall provide storm sewer pipe sizing details for all onsite storm sewer. 13 Attachment 7 5)There are a number of storm sewer pipes shown on the plans to have a slope of 0.3%. City standards require a minimum slope of 0.5%. These pipes shall be revised to meet this requirement. 6)Emergency overland overflows shall be identified on the plans for thelow-point in the parking-lot.Similarly, the high-water level (HWL) and normal water level (NWL) shall be noted on the plansfor the underground infiltration system. 7)If the underground infiltration system does not contain an integrated pre-treatment system, a sump-manhole or other pre-treatment device shall be installed immediately upstream of the system. 8)A 12” storm sewer stub is currently shown near the building entrance. The applicant shall detail what the intended purposeis for this stub. 9)The applicant shall provide computations showing the proposed cut and fill within the 100-year HWL of the adjacent pond to ensure no detrimental impact will occur as a result. Grading and Erosion Control 10)All slopesshall be 3H:1V or flatter. 11)The proposed infiltration areasshall be protected from sedimentation throughout construction. 12)Inlet protection devices shall be installed on allexistingand proposedonsite storm seweruntil all exposed soils onsite are stabilized. Additionally, storm sewer inlets along adjacent City and private roadsshall be protected throughout construction. 13)Adjacent streetsshall be swept as needed to keep the pavementclear of sediment and construction debris. 14)All pedestrian facilities shallbe ADA compliant.This includes the proposed pedestrian ramp and walkway on the Park property at the east end of the project. 15)A copy of the project SWPPP and NDPES Permit shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 16)Stabilized construction entrances shall be placed at all entry/exit points to the site, including the access off of Beam Avenue. 17)The total grading volume (cut/fill) shall be noted on the plans. 14 Attachment 7 18)All emergency overland overflows shall contain adequate stabilization to prevent soils from eroding during large storm events. 19)The proposed retaining wall at the east end of the project will require an engineered design as well as a building permit. 20)The landscaping plan depicts a planting bed within the emergency overflow area on the north side of the development. Likewise, this planting bed is proposed to be placed on top of an existing storm-sewer pipe. The plan shall be revised to ensure the emergency overflow elevation is not compromised and that plants do not block the emergency overflow path. Please note that planting within the storm-sewer easement is done at the applicants risk. Should future storm-sewer work within the easement be necessary, plants in this area could likely be damaged or destroyed. 21)Adequate scour protection shall be provided at all curb-cuts that allow runoff to enter the proposed raingarden. It is advised that this scour protection be extended to the bottom of the garden to minimize erosion and future maintenance issues. 22)The raingarden detail depicts a 36” depth of engineered soil containing 70% sand and 30% compost. There is some concern that plants will find it difficult to establish in this depth of engineered soil. The applicant should consider reducing this soil depth to ensure plant roots can reach the underlying soils. 23)Rain Garden Plantings. a.A large portion of the infiltration basin has no plants. Please indicate what plant material will in the bottom of the basin. b.Two species on the rain garden slope (lilac and juniper), don’t handle standing water so will probably not do well on the bottom of the slope. You may want to consider a more water tolerant species for the row of plants along the bottom of the rain garden slope. 24)Plant selection. Please substitute another shrub for the barberry. Barberry is beginning to become invasive in our area. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 25)Sanitary sewer service piping shall be schedule 40 PVC or SDR 35. 26)The proposed water service modifications are subject to the review and conditions of Saint Paul Regional Water Services(SPRWS). The applicant shall submit plans and specifications to SPRWS for review and meet all requirements they may haveprior to the issuance of a grading permit by the City. 15 Attachment 7 27)The applicant shall provide fixture unit computations verifying that the sewer service is adequate for the proposed building. 28)The applicant shall be responsible for paying any SAC, WAC, or PAC charges related to the improvements proposed with this project. Other 29)The plans shall besigned by a professional engineer currently licensed in the State of Minnesota. 30)The applicant shall ensure the site is navigable and accessible by emergency service vehicles. 31)A right-of way permit shall be submitted for any work within the public right-of-way. 32)The Owner shall sign a maintenance agreement, prepared by the City, for all storm water treatment devices (sumps, storm sewer, infiltration systems, ponds,etc.). 33)Perpetual easements and agreements are necessary to detail all improvements and usage of Maplewood Parks land. Similarly, a cross-access agreement is necessary to detail the use of the property at 2001 Beam Avenue by persons or vehicles accessing the park. 34)All improvements on Maplewood Park property shall be coordinated with the Maplewood Parks and Recreation department. 35)A temporary construction easement shall be obtained from the Parks and Recreation department prior to the start of any work on park property. 36)Please provide a truck-turning diagram at the eastern entrance for the largest truck expected to utilize this property. 37)The applicant shall provide a signed copy of the MPCA construction stormwater permit prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 38)The applicant shall provide a self-renewing letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of 125% of the proposed site improvements including earthwork, grading, erosion control, site vegetation establishment, aggregate base, and paving. 39)The applicant shall satisfy the requirements of all other permitting agencies. Please provide copies of other required permits and approvals. - END COMMENTS - 16 Attachment 8 17 Attachment 8 18 Attachment 8 19