Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 06-08 & 06-12 City Council Packeti' AGEMA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 44,30 P*M*9 Thursday, June 8, 1989 and 7:00 P.M., Monday, June 12, 1989 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 89-13 A. CALL To ORDER Be ROLL CALL C L......--ft"APPROVAL OF MINUTES 19 Minutes of Meeting No. 89-2 (January 23, 1989). Do APPROVAL OF AGENDA E0_ CONSENT AGENDA lo Approval of Claims 2o Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 1810 County Road B (Fulk) 3* Planning commission Resignation 4. Time Extension: CAve's English Street 2nd Addition 59 Donations To Maplewood Nature Center 6. Resolut* lon - National Night out - 1989 Fe AWARD OF BTDS lo Walter Street, Project 84-14 2. City Vehicles G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Plan Amendment Gervalis Ave. (BBY Partnership) 2* Fish Creek Estates,* a. 3 Code Variations b,p Approval of a "Relaxed Urban" Street Design c • Preliminary Plat--,- 3e Revocation of Permit - Hause Recreational Vehicle Permit He NEW BUSINESS lo 1990-1994 Capital Improvement Plan (4 Votes) 1. is 2 Pipe Line Setback Variance Lot 15, Block 2, Hills and Dales Addition (Duluth and Junction) 3. Pipe Line Setback Variance - Maplewood Meadows 4. Code Amendment - Pipeline Setback (1st Readl*ng)---,.-- 5. Southlawn Traffic 6. White Bear Avenue & Burke Street - Street Light Request 7.. Time Extension: Home Occupation (2095 Larpenteur Avenue) 8. Motor Fuel Station Moratorium 9. City Clean-Up Day 10. Cable: History of Maplewood 11. Code Amendment: Off-Street Parking (Ist Reading)- r.nTTWr.TT. PRV..qVMfrATTr)MQ 2. 30 40 50 60 To 80 9. 1,00 J. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Code Review — R-3 District 2. 30 4# 5 K. ADJOURNMENT OF 6-8-1989 MEETING Lo RECONVENE: CALL 6-12-1989 MEETING TO ORDER N. ROLL CALL N.A. APPOINTMENTS 1. Park and Rec reat-ion Comm iis-s ion-- _ -- - - N* PUBLIC HEARINGS 110 7:00 P.M., Geranium/ Ferndale Storm Sewer Project 87-20 - Assessment Hearing 2e 70*10 P.M., Rezoning (4 Votes) and Preliminary Plat: C. Little Addition 3o 7 2 PeMov Conditional Use permit: 1580 Sterling St. (Jamieson) 4* 7:30 P*Mo, Code Amendment: RE District (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) 5. 70*40 P.M., Hazelwood Heights a. Rezoning (4 Votes) b. Variations C* Preliminary Plat 6. 7*050 P*M9, Rezoning (4 Votes) and Preliminary Plat - Beth Heights Addition 7* 80000 P*M*q Variances: 3-M Center VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Pe ADJOURNMENT OF' 6-12-1989 MEETING 4 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, January 3, 1989 Council Chambers y Municipal Building Meeting No. 89 -2 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minn F � Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:02 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B . ROLL CALL John C. Greavu:, Mayer Present Norman G.. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present F. Rossbach, Councilmember ► bsent C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the A ends as amended: 1. Council - Legal Staff 2. Upper Afton Road 3* Add I -9, Metropolitan Council Appointment 4. Add I -10, Gervais Avenue Apartments - Schedule Hearin Date 5. Add I -11, Senior Citizen Valentine Part g Y b. Pending Litigation - Closed Session Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes all E -A APPOINTMENTS le H * R. C. a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to-appoint Paul 0. Sand and Carol H* Engel to the Human Relations Commission. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. E* CONSENT _ AGENDA Ayes - all. Councilmember Rossbach moved, seconded j? Cou the Consent Agenda Items E -1 through 9 as recommended: ncilmember Bastian, &es -all, to a rove 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following: ACCOUNT'S PAYABLE: F $ 625, 904.89 174,713.61 $ 1239420.33 $ 9 24, 03 8.83 PAYROLL: $ 1609802.64 $ 309953914 $ 1919755.78 $19115,794.61 '2. Final Plat: Maidment Terrace Checks #8621 - Dated 01 -03 -89 Checks #5297 - Dated 01 -23 -89 Checks #5245 - Da,ted 01- -23 -89 #8664 thru 01 -11 -89 #5357 (1988 Expense) #5287 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAIM TOTAL Approved the Maidment Terrace Final Plat. 3. Conditional Use Permit Renewal 2405 Carver Avenue (Grand) Approved the renewal of the beauty shop home occupation at 2405 Carver Avenue for five years, subject to the January 12, 1987, conditions of approval, and subject to relocating the ground sign by May 1, 1989, to be fifteen (15) feet back from the front property line. 4. Budget Change: Curbside Recycling Authorized a budget change to finance the curbside recycling program for 1989. Increase the estimated revenues by $78,176 to equal the Ramsey County grant money to be received from 1969 and increase expenditure account 101 704 4330 by $78,176. - 2 - 1/23 5. Change Orders for Park Improvements: 88-2P Authorized to modify the existing contract vith Eneback Construction Company by executing Change Orders I through 4 for Maplewood Park. Improvement Projects 88-2) and approved the funding as follows: Change Order 1 - Geranium - Neighborhood PAC Fund $7t250*50 Change Order 2 - Hazelwood -,Hazelwood TIF Fund $3 ,136.00 Change Order 3 - Playcrest - Playcrest TIF Fund $ 411*48 Change Order 4 - Sherwood - Sherwood TIF Fund $39828o50 6. Replacement of Park Maintenance Person Authorized the hiring of a Park Maintenance Person I for the Parks and Recreation Departments. 7. Reappointment of HRC Authorized the reappointment of Sister Claire Lynch, Scott Rostron, and Patricia Williamson to the Human Relations Commission, 8. Purchase of Police Vehicles Authorized the purchase of four marked patrol vehicles and two paramedic patrol vehicles. 9. Accepting Gift - Trinity Baptist Accepted the gift of $400 from the Trinity Baptist Church and forward a letter of thank you. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7,000 P.M., Conditional Use Permit Revision: Menards ae Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Menard, Inc., to revise their conditional use permit to permit them to increase the height of their screening fence from ten to fourteen feet along the south and east lot lines, b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. - 3 - d* -Commissioner Frank Dempsey presented the Planning Commission recommendation. e. Board Member Anitzberger presented the Community Design Review Board recom- mendation. f. Mr. William Rosen and Mr. Mary Pruchaska, representing Menards, spoke on behalf of their request. 9. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. The following residents expressed their opinions: Craig Anderson, speaking for his mother, Esther Anderson, 1101 E. County Road B Ron Mechvra, 1160 E. County Road B Laura Hartman. 1081 E. County Road B Gordon Anderson, 2255 Duluth. St. Mr. Jungman spoke on behalf of his sister who lives at 1143 E. County Road B .Bernie Miner, 1115 E. County Road B Cathy Duprey, 1071 E. County Road B Jane Gerard, 1133 E. County Road B Mrs. Bernard Miner, 1115 E. County Road B h. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. i. Councilmember Rossbach moved to table this item for inter p etation. Motion died for lack of a second. 0 j. Counc ilmemb e r Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Ro - 1, - I WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to revise condition of, the conditional use permit for the following-described property: Parcel 1: That certain triangular tract of land situated in the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, described as follows, to-. wit: Commencing at a point on the East line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 9 at its intersection with the Easterly line of United States Highway No. 61, as widened; thence South on the East line of said Southwest Quarter to a point 100 feet North of the North Line of County Road B; thence West and parallel - 4 - with the North line of said County Road B; thence West and parallel with the North line of said County Road B to the Easterly line of United States h-ighway No. 61, as widened; thence Northeasterly along the Easterly line of said United States Highway No. 61, as widened, to the point of beginning. Parcel. 2: The South 107 feet of that part of the North 5 acres of the South 50 rods of the North 105 rods of the West 32 rods of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, which lies Southeasterly of the following- described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said 5 -acre tract which line is the South line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distant 60 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence running Northeasterly to the Northeast corner of said tract and there terminating. Parcel 3: All that part of the West 32 rods of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, lying North of County Road B, except Heinemann's Belleview Addition to Gladstone, and except highway. Parcel 4: Block 16, lying South of State Trunk Highway No. 36, except the East 240 feet thereof; and Block 15, except the East 240 feet thereof, and except part thereof taken for highway; and Block 10, except the East 30 feet thereof, and except that part of the West 225 feet of the East 255 feet thereof lying South of the North 30 feet thereof, all in Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota. This property is also known as 2280 Maplewood Drive, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was originally approved by the Maplewood City Council on March 28, 1988. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider this revision on January 23, 1989. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state- ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. - 5 - WHEREAS, condition two of the conditli-onal use permit did not reflect the intent of the City Council in approving the conditional use permit, NOVI, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that condition two is corrected as follows: 2. Materials in the storage yard shall be no more than 20% visible from the residential lots to the south-. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson* Ayes - all, G. AWARD OF BIDS None H. -UNFINISHED BUSINTESS 1. Clarification - Temporary Part-Tiate Employee Rates a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 0 b. Mayor Greavu.introduced the followin& resolution and moved its _ado pt3.on: 89 -1 -3 WHEREAS, according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations Act, part-time employees who do not work more than. 14 hours per week and temporary employees who do not work in excess of 67 days in a calendar year are not covered by union contract wage rates. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay rate maximums are hereby established for temporary and part-time employees retroactive to January 1, 1989: Recreation Worker Recreation Of f licial Puppeteers Accountant Administrative Assistant Secretary $11.28 per hour 16.95 per game 28.24 per show 14.20 per hour 10.50 per hour 9.77 per hour Accounting Clerk 10.10 per hour Clerk- Typist 8.87 per hour Election Judge 5050 per hour Election Precinct Cha .rman 5.7.5 per hour Laborer 6.00 per hour Engineering Aide 6.60 per hour Janitor 4.95 per hour BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the minimum pay rates for each of the above be (1) the amount specified by Federal Law for those positions covered and (2) $2.50 per hour for those positions not covered by Federal or State Law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager shall have the authority to set the pay rate within the .above ranges. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson` Ayes -- Ma. or Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker & Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Bastian* 2. Rules of Procedures a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to table this item until the February 27, 1989 Meeting. Seconded by Mayor Greavu., Ayes - a11. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Recycling Update - Mike Heinz a. Mike Heinz updated the Council regarding the City -wide recycling program. 2. Insurance Coverage for Council a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. - 7 - b. Councilmember Anderson moved to authorize the accident insurance policy. Councilmember Anderson withdrew his motion. c. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until the February 27, 1989 Meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Southlawn Avenue: Project 88 -17 - Change Order No. 1. a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption_ 89 -1 -4 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 85 -17 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 85 -17, Change Order One. (The modifica- tion being a time change.) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order One. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 4. Beam Avenue. West of T.H. 61 to County Road D. Project 88 -12 - Schedule Public Hearing a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 89 -1 -5 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Beam Avenue from 450 feet west of T.H. 61 to County Road D. City Project 88 -12, by construction of 44 -foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Beam Avenue from 450 feet west of T.H. 61 to County Road D. City Project 88 -12, by construction of 44 -foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,003,950. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 27th day of February, 1989, at 7:00 P.M. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Bastian 5. Carey Heights Drive, Project: Project 88 -09 - Schedule Public Hearing a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 89 -1 -6 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Carey Heights Drive from Kohlman Lake Overlook plat to County Road D. City Project 88 -09, by construction of 32 foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, utilities, and appurtenances, and WHEREAS. the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: 'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD* MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Frank Street from Koh1man Lake Overlook plat to County Road D and Carey He:Lights Drive south cul-de-sac, C.ity Project 88-09, by construction of 32 foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, utilities, and appurtenances 3'--s feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a por- tion of the cost of the improvement according to LISA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $619,045. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Counca"I Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County :Road B on Monday, the 27th day of February, 1989, 0 at 7:10 P.M. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 6. T.H. 61 Watermain, Project 87-44 - Change Order a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to proceed with Option 3!to modify the contract to cover actual vilinp, requirements but to construct the casing pipe crossin and connection to the existing water ma-in on the North side of Beam Avenue with the least cost design possible. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson* Ayes - all. C. Councilmember Rossbach moved to continue the ect and complete the lo Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 7. Council-Staff Workshop a. -Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. - 10 - b. Mayor Greavu moved to. au ' thorize the Manager to schedule meetings between the Council, City Manager and individual departments and then brin& back the Council/Staff Workshops for consideration. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Rossbach Nays - Councilmember Bastian 8. Emergency Management Director and Assistant Director Salaries a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report, b. . Mayor Greavu moved that the salary for Emergency ManMement Director be invreased to $600 per month and the De2uty Director to $375 per month. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson* Ayes - all,. 9. Applicants: Metropol.itan-Council Appointment a., Manager McGuire informed the Council regarding applicants for vacancies on the Metropolitan Council Commissions* 10.. Senior Citizens - Valentine Party a. Mayor Greavu moved to approve a budget transfer of $200 from the Contingency Account to the proper account to donate $200 to the Senior Citizens' Valentine Par Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 11. Gervais Apartments.* Schedule Hearing Date a. Mayor Greavu moved to schedule a special meeting on March 2, 1989, at 6:00 P.M., BBY Partnership,Inc., regarding their proposal for an apartment comEle-x- on Gervais Avenue, Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESE14TATION 1. Joseph Zappa, 2522 Flandrau Mr. Zappa questioned the possibility of Council pursuing purchase of the property in question regarding the Gervais Avenue complex. - 11 - Is 2. Carol Fritsche, 2109 Lydia a. Mrs. Frits,che stated she had applied for a home occupation permit at 2100 Lydia to conduct a skin care business, but was told her home did not meet the requirements. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to refer Mrs. Fritsche s problems for investigation. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.. Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1 Council/Legal Staf f a. Councilmember Anderson would like to have a meeting with legal staff for update on litigation. b* A date of March 9. 1989, was suggested. It was referred to the Manager, .2. Upper Afton Road a. Mayor Greavu has received several calls regarding the upgrading of Upper Afton Road b. Staff will investigate. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Bastian moved to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and.Rossbach. Adj ourned at 9 :22 P.M. Nay - Councilmember Anderson. City Clerk AGENDA REPORT TOO City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: June 2, 1989 Agenda Number E -1 Action by Council: Endorsed,_.., Modif i e��_ „__,.,____, Rejected._..., Date It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 363,933.74 Checks #6440 - #6515 Dated 05 -12 -89 thru 05 -31 -89 $ 90,211.91 Checks #1010 - #1145 Dated 06 -08 -89 $ 454,145.65 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 170,044.13 $ 32,542.58 $ 202,586.71 $ 656,732.36 Payroll Checks Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. DFF: kaz "Womfi - _ _.. ,..._ r.,_,.- ......., �• -. �._.�. ..,. `� _7 L-- ,:L��. � � , .., T. W, � .,. ,,,,.,,. -<..,, .......,v,,,,c.,.. „, ...,,,,,rvw�- •e...,,^3 Frr,.«. ,..� VOUC:HREG CITY OF' MAPL E:WOOD FAGE:. 2 {{i 1 .� 06/01/89 14:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER F fO�Fi' F�:.F tjU ��� � '3I VOUCHER/ 4 ; CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK i 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT � _ I 6450 541400 05/15/89 MINN. STATE T•RE.ASURE R MOTOR VE:H L.IC FEES, r ;� 7, 7714.1 • 0 ..__.._, _ �/ 30 i.77 « . . off` tt! 0+451 541400 05115/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC � ELF ;5 6452 540900 05/16/89 MINN. G . F .O. A. TRAVEL & TRAIN 9.00 RAVEL L: TRAIN - - 0 _ 18.0_ ,. 6454 661750 05/16/89 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTIL 1;3`1 80 F R . T 10.4.2 t�t UTIL 154.0 CORDG UTIL Z55 R:IPLEY� x.75 UTIL 1315 HWY 36 103.51 ,.:; .,.... .. UTIL 1698 PARKWAY . UTIL 2005 EDGE RTC! 113 «05 UTIL 1944 DESOTO 3. z • 40 i , UTIL 474 KINGS7 ! � _ t» l • UTIL 1401 GERVA S 134.7 UTIL 2.7 4 0 K E L. L. E— k UTIL 741 L_ A r T 1 G1 UTIL ,;,.:.,. 5 0 M. M E., N E {�q��a G .! 4 •.79 .; tw� H. it Ki UTIL '1882 E � RF, tV 5 1 3 6455 541400 05/16/89 MINN. STATE TRLA URE R' STATE DRI V LIC 844.5G 044.50 i 6456 541400 05116/89 MINN. STATE -,..h ASURER M U I — F VEH LIC . F E _ S _ _. _ - y � 5 !4 iii} 4570155 05/17/89 LU+f:HEE, IAYtE� ESE I TN A M1-5 90 309 $j 9� i431 6458 5.41400 05/ 1 7'/89 MINN. ;: TATE TREASURER STATE DR I V LIC F EE S 660 �. t . 5 +� 660.50 6459 541400 05/17/89 MINN. MI NI'd . `=' STATE "�K .A�,UkE:Ft MOTOR � �' 5 �5 F 6460 140400 05/18/89 CLERK C' DISTRICT COURT COUNTY UyTY FiI..IN FEE 11Or40 118.0U ,t riI 6461 541400 05/18/89 MINN. STATE TG EA S (M R DEPUTY UTY RrGI : I kAF 71803.50 79803.50 1 6' ? i4 C— r :. 707 - Z. 7 5 h' _,.. ...... ... ........ .. . .... ..... . _ 2501 - tt� 1 830 61-531 . 85 ,)! 540.70 1825 6.60 6463 541400 05/18/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LICENSE 414.00 414.00 t 6464 190400 05/19/89 DEPT. OF' NA- l"URAL RE SOUR$E 1 I)NR L.I C:EN$:3 ,�! . � . 54w ' :. c'~ 54 -.+.■ U a 531 • "� "j1;ti�� ~ ^ , . i 6465 _. 6ttV 05 1 9/89 �(1�G wA+� ! kfi M l � Sy E CONTROL ri�L � r A. N PA A1 6499 190400 05 / -6/89 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSE S DNR LICENSE FEES � X17 ��5 . 00 425.00 ���r Vow +UCHREC C I y OF MAPLE WOOD . PAGE 4 6500 05/Z6/89 06/01 /89 14:43 � R VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER i; : FOR PERIOD u.., 541400 _ 05 /c 6/89 - MINN. STATE. TREAS;UREF; � VOUCHER/ HER/ 6503 510900 05/30/89 MAPL.EWOOD STATE BANK FICA PAYABLE 71435.34 a CHECK NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER CHE*Ck MATE VENDOR {SAME ITEM DESCRIPTION, � ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT FICA CONTRIBUTIONS, "� � �..r�.,�4 34 �.7 .y' i 6t_)4 661750 U5 ►/3 ��/3� _ PROGRAM SUP I ES. SUPPLIES VEHICLE UTIL x.300 FROST 99 ! 2tt� ''. UTIL 1 2 0 0 STERLING . c�. FE �' OR wE.R1� I CE F jL } 13 6486- 70600 05/24/89 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 31000.00 31000.00 UTIL 1677 f: :I)GERl•uN 78.91 i... ... .. .- ... ........... .... .. .. .. .. .. ... ... 430300 _. ... ... - .. 05/24/89 .. ... _. .. .. K0KE.H ATHLETIC .. .. .. .... _. . .. ... ....- .. ... .. ..... .. ._ ....... - _... . PROGRAM SUP Pl.I ES .,PROGRAM I6 . _y, , ' 4 - _ ��6487 7�3 O «: 40 _ UTIL 2725 AFTON 18 5 • x.. , 67 UTIL " 3 ' M A R hi I E ^a��.t�� 6488 5=41400 05/Z4/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRI V LI C FEES UTIL ZZ87 lMA1LAND 674.00 674400 . �W ..... 1 �:3�1 r�� t:y f;,n r 541 X00 0 /��/ MINN. STATE TREAS URER sR _ R MCtuR VEH LTC F E ,� � :•1 � �5 10.100.60 10.100 , � tj 05/30/89 U« «P C « REGION 18 TRAVEL `RAIN 6490 140400 05/25/39 CLERK OF DISTRICT' COURT N� DRIVERS C Y DRIVERS t -IC « . �,�� . 1 � R•�.E� _� r - - ... w.. �w" i�i5? RW�r:..+, n!✓ a .n...MYn..+Y✓i•+�.,......_F... w +...,ya.+f»w. "MFV,i,•i.YM•».ra_.M1:r .'M•M•+.^w� i 6491 181200 05/25/89 DANDIER INC. CONTRACT PYMr 591414�1� 99 414.13 'y! 6492 541400 05/25/89 MINN. STATE. TREASURER 31 STATE DRIVERS LIC. 277000 277=.00 6493 541400 05/26/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR 'VEH LIC \ 4 At r ;s b 6496 72ZZOO 05/Z5/89 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE FERA DEDUCTION 99 '50 •.05 " 37 PERA CONT R I BUT I ON 1 Z 1 411. 07 2 A 1'91T 4.1 z as 4 97 630745 05/26/89 NATIONAL IE. PR T _ T I ON _ A aN . D C � , �n. m �r _ : v _ f•^•r••f'a,±,.n.. �,- .ra' yr. y::c•. ....,..,^ ^K s's pr " . :rc ., �.+.r -.: ji •- x; -n• -- � 1 �M •f ' � r"* `k sF �" §Aye 3.3� (( ,/ __(3:40400 p� 9y .+�/ T ST .PAUL Cr 1 aAU�. �.+.T FEES �'t.�R �E�V C.:E w: ._. 1: tww4ti1.� +�i,.,»wwrHI+.r -ww.w .M.ruin,•r_• .YYw x• k •.+Fw!f' 4 M1i%+Yry 4. 6499 190400 05 / -6/89 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSE S DNR LICENSE FEES � X17 ��5 . 00 425.00 ���r 'A 6506 541400 05/30/89 MINN. STATE. TREASURER MOTOR VEH l_ I C FEE'$ 10 148 7 . �5 1014 �? � �5 0. 6500 541400 05/Z6/89 MINN. S FATE f REASURE �� E tN � � •3 � i; 650 I 541400 _ 05 /c 6/89 - MINN. STATE. TREAS;UREF; STATE: DRi V L I F = 6503 510900 05/30/89 MAPL.EWOOD STATE BANK FICA PAYABLE 71435.34 FED INC TAX PAY � �JII ��.�31n. FICA CONTRIBUTIONS, "� � �..r�.,�4 34 �.7 .y' i 6t_)4 661750 U5 ►/3 ��/3� _ ���R`iMERN �,_•�.AT Rt���lEFt _ - _ UTIL x.300 FROST 2,.., -�- -3 -:`_tip ! 2tt� UTIL 1 2 0 0 STERLING . c�. � ;,• UTIL 98 LARD NT 89.07 UTIL 1677 f: :I)GERl•uN 78.91 'A UTIL :725 AFTON 147. ���; _�� _ UTIL 2725 AFTON 18 5 • x.. , 67 UTIL " 3 ' M A R hi I E ^a��.t�� r.si UTIL ZZ87 lMA1LAND . �W ..... 1 �:3�1 r�� t:y ;i' if t :•1 � �5 I �;,i 3'�0 00 05/30/89 U« «P C « REGION 18 TRAVEL `RAIN 105.00 105.00 ►,s 'A 6506 541400 05/30/89 MINN. STATE. TREASURER MOTOR VEH l_ I C FEE'$ 10 148 7 . �5 1014 �? � �5 0. .: �,»..-,..-..+ e.- ��. 4. �..... �... r.__ ^_r_,.........�,.w. +,�+,.�..,., . n.....,.,.:. e.^ �, �,- i..« �.. � ,.�,«n�- .r.�.,.�.�.,....».,.r"- ..`fir_.,,,...- .sy... ^�_r'_:.: �._�_ ,.` ..m.., •���_�. ^.E._. `.__ _ -_ ._,____._. �- rryrx+^ j- �.....- c�- nh?�,^^,y,.,^...^..^:^�.^.,.,r atmf ++e*.t' ^Im° ^Ma^M*�9M+*nc..... ��sl'°".� ..- r`.^t_9'at +..mth'aFi�tr^^°.•%� _._.:._.- _._....-- .._.., ..,.. _.-_ __'___- .._._-- �----- •--- w...• -- ..._ ..- --- •ir.., --!r .-- rr--:_ - r -r�!-� - rtixr+ -.r. -: r'. "•x. �-*+- ... .,o ...._ a...H.. ... ,.._ ... ... ...,,,.,.....,.- •._...>_....... ...,.. .-w .... .-.... .._.. _ -- r VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 i 06/01/89 14:43 VOUCHER /CHECK RE(xl TER FOR PERIOD 05 VOUCHER/ 4. . ....... . CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK � NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT. AMOUNT �7 _ 1023 101550 06/08/89 BUREAU CRIMINAL APPREHENSION TRAVEL TRAIN 5 0.00 �0. `�i0 - l Ejj It 1OZ4 110100 06/08/89 C N.WwTRANSPORTATION CO* i�.E. i-OR RV' 1025 110275 06/03/35+ �, ^ r�. CALIBRE PRESS TRAVEL � i "RAIN 122 5 .0 0 ,� 3� _. TRAVEL TRAIN 1_ �.., UZ6 110310 I ..y 06/08/89 CAMPBELL, LYLA , � PROGRAM RE'G FEES z � .9 1027 110425 06/08/89 CAPITOL SUPPLY CO . MAINT MATERIAL 71-08, 71.08 } 1028 110460 06/03/39 CAREER TRACK INC. TRAIN 124 TRAVEL. fRAII4 7777777 «:0 TRAVEL TRAIN ..+�0. l L:7 102 1 105 5 0 /0 / 3' CAROLINA BIOLOGICAL PRt GRAM UPPL IE L4. X4:.31 {ai 10:0 120600 06/08/89 CEN ; URY FEEDS S. . MALL TO OLS .� �w� 0 n-.�- - '32 Q,9 0. � 0� /0�l�� COMMISSIONER 0 F T AN PO TA I0 N � REPAIR MA IhT UME T. ., yy .� ( : ,. 34 .. . . .. ,..,__ .. ._.,- ._..._. r . .............�.. -.._. _..,..._.., .._... -J r• -; , 103 � 152100 06/08/35 _.. ...... ...- .......,•.. CONI INE.NT•AL SAFETY EQUIPMENT .. ..ter, RE PA I & MAINT /E" Z7 «s0 7 REPAIR & MAINT /E 34 « � • REPAIR & MAINT /E t 4 1 w �Vr .. .. _ . r.. - .. 1033 i U L 4A �V PROD r . CO DUPLICATING 4 1034 152 ►/03/E . - .. .._ .. ... .. ,. _..., .. ... ...... .. .. ... .... .... ... ._..- _. --._.. _.....- _...>..... CCiPY EUIPME::NT, INCwLIF'F'i- ...._..... ....... _... .__, .." .._..- ...._..�. -.+.-...__._..+. w..-.... w,.., ...FM.s?rtl..iM1..u•M..ywYWw.' 1E..EtUIFfMfNT .wuh 97.47 EQUIPMENT OFFICE 371 «U4 4 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT .� 1 7 U 48 SUPPL.I ES EQUIPMENT .3 S EQUIPMENT.. UPPLI FS EQUIP ME NT.: 14. J I �i p p �n }y �-• k Uaf i- L =! U: l'•!!w. i?i . (� ►I "' _ .. -. 611 1035 152500 06/08/89 CORPORATE. RISK MANAGERS, INC. FEES FOR SERVICE 155.00 155.00 „41 � 1036 161 100 06/0:j:/89 C•RAGUN' S CONFERENCE CENTER TRAVEL, TRAIN 360» 1 1 , . 360.11 { 1037 130300 06/03/89 D A L C U SUPPLIES F � iE E ,1 A N T T U R 1 4 , .- r._.•,•,� `.�.., 1038 181 06/08/89 DATA DISPATCH DELIVERY :;0.00 �0•V0 �E;s RA• 1039 210300 6/08/$9 DONS PAINT BODY A/R INS; C LA I M; A/R INS CLAIMS x.05— 35 r-r i 1040 230700 06/08/89 EAST SIDE G.T.C. SUPPLI ES VE HI C LE - 20.79 20.79 �sf 1)S , 1041 �n 0900 06/08/89 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY :U�- S�O ! I Jib ; SUPPLIES Uf-('ICE I� M . OFFICE 2:3. 4. 3 w 2 4.tPPL 4' SUPPLIES OFFICE, %o 5 r _ �., .,.. _ , ._.. ... r t i s ...... — —.. �. tt.__ _ . ,_ -- — — - -- - �. -- — — --.. _. _ .. .�. .n� ...,. ,. -�- - -�,� w . >. .. .. ,. ,.. ,. -_ .. :_ _'- __ ,__�. ._�. _ :_�_: Fi'n'n !a+±e._ .. .._ .. ... _ .. ..____..._..._.. �__._...__.J,._ _._�______�__..__._.___�._�__,� _ ... _ . _ ...._. _.. _... _..... _ \ IF • V VOUC:HREG C CITY OF MAPI. E:WtiOD P 1 t; 06/01/89 1 14 :43 V VOUCHER / /Cl'IECK REGISTER � �'d' FOR PERIOD 05 , t 1 , VOUCHER/ •��� � 31 ' f C CHECK V VENDOR C CHECK V VENDOR I ITEM • ITEM CHECK - �� - N NUMBER N NUMBER D DATE N NAME D DESCRIPTION A AMOUNT AtMUUNT ; ;� [ ' '+ . ~.�� �,�U 8 PUBLISHING P1.1BLISHING PUBLISHING 6 61.30 •t f f 1 14 PUBLISHING 6 61.30 1 ► 1 t t: PUBLISHING �,1II ! PUBLISHING 6 61.E X UBL.. 1060 3 391600 0 06/08/89 I INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE S SUBS ;x MEMBERS 1 140,00 140.Gt} 2 23 _ 1 : : 0 0 / J J THOMAS ATHI- ET I CS P _ '�5a � • 1 PROGRAM SUPPLIES „ „. 134 � Z i 1c� : f R A . r < i i2n 1062 4 p` 1 06 /D /B9 K K MART P PROGRAM SUPPLIES - -4X57 1291 . 410480 0 06/08/89 K : :OUTSIDE E >1 v 1 133• C . , / /� { .4 ��- 0 {� KEN NA,, 0 , t , 1065 4 4 ,0:108 0 06/08/89 K KIMBALL MIDWEST M MAINTENANCE MATERIAL. 8 � 2 2 _.... _ _ 1066 4 430300 0 06/08/89 K KNGWLAIV S P PROGRAM .. .... . T ' '... ... ...:..... .. . 1 F • C C i r : a 4 43 , : P PROGRAM SUPPLIER 2 2113..76 ��a{t5 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6 648.70 972 . 10 ia7 , , 0 1068 4 44000 / /0 /S9 I IRATE BUNNI P ..,... .. .. ,._..... _,. ,.., : :....- . <..,, -.. '.•t ., n ,,Km•. ^..?ry'••it.en+., <nce ..r�.r :,!•"rr+ .m•.'•,.s^•K++.r ..•r :.....• +.••..n...•c., -,..- "': ' 1 1069 1 1 0 06/08/89 K KRAUSE - . .� .... , 1070 4 440400 0 06/08/879 K KUSZ, R ITA P PROGRAM REG FEES ' 'Zoe 00 20000 5 :Ai 1071 4 460605 0 06/08/89 LE�:WARDS P PROGRAM SUPPLIES , ,; • 5r 1072 4 4 070 / / ` /`� S S w r` P,� " } PUB M f }y� I 1073 5 501225 0 06/08/89 M MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT S SUPPLIES VEHICLE 2 26.47 26.47 1 153 1 .' I 1074 5 511 Z 5 0 06/08/89 M MAPLE W OD S CR EENPRINT . UNIFORMS CLOTHING 8 . _ .. . ,. .. .. ,, , _ .... .... ... _, . .,... _ .. ,. ,... - ter.. ..�.,..., ..•c, VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD .\I RAGE cs ri �r 4 :45 Vu CHER/ , F O R PERIOD .._R . . .: ._ ._...__._h.i.. CHECK VENDOR GH: G, VENDOR I TEM ITEM CHECK 15`ci5�4�'? 1 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCR IPT ION AMOUNT AMOUNT ! 161 1079 0LZo 06 8/8 MIDWEST ANIMAL SERVICE ANIMA. CANT N� 2, 000.9 2, 000 98 Q3VOUCHES 1080 540745 _. 06/08-/89 MINN CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES „ SUPPLIES OFFICE .n.....I..+_•.w:, . . _ _ �,CD T ,.�...r• cei' •(Y •j 1081 540875 06/08/89 MINN. DEPT. CJF PUBLI C SAE -•E *TY FEES FOR SERVICE 3.00 31 . 00 15 1082 5 � 1 C6 O�8 S B. CU� t I oN 19 97 199 97 f � ` 108 .:1.. 510690. 06/08/89 MOGREN BROS.. MAINT MATERIAL y. 1 MAIN'r MATERIAL 139.50 ! MAINT MATERIAL rs 523.50 D /t lS' MDrO kOt REPAIR MAINT 71 .9'0 1 REPAIR MAINT /R REPAIR MT C RADIO 1085 610025 06/08/89 MUDGETT, WAYNE SANDRA SPEC S� SDD ., 1 300.00 �'�y �i . ,� r_ 7 . NATI NA U # U M 1 S W_ _ - +w5 :..: ..w• ,.r q ` L �;.._. n !._ '?-w._ r ++w` wr_w.:+_n._w.+. +....._w_ ti M� i..w._ w +.. . •'_,_ '_ '�." - _•,_..+_,r- +.......:.. r- ^.+.,+. ..•_-e. _ .. «.w.._ ..n w+..... r V L ► 9 T 6 ' 0 32 } - 4 � 68 7 . 7 ' + LO /89, N TIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN. rJU.I ry ' U L MEMBERSHIP 60. 00 1 , 5 2C. 65 i37 i ++€ in� 1088 v .... 6SD550 » 06/0$ /89 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES = F jj 41 6301 F.'.0:6/08/89 NCR REPAIR MAINr /r 43, REPAIR f: REPAIR & MAINT /E 16.50 145 REPAIR & MAINT /E 16.50 ds MA XNT rE REPAIR MAINT /E 1850 4K;1:3;7 REPAIR MAINT /E 16,50 #►�t�; � REPAIR MAINT /r REPAIR MA IN'r E Z738 159.38 1 090 640800 46 /DS /8�,NELSON., . •....:. .: . ROBE RT •N .__- .. _. . UNIFORMS CLOTH • � 289 —'5 71 . _ 1091 660800 06/08/89 NORTH ST • PAUL CITY QF UTILITIES 1 7 090 .20 1 090 20 5 t ._. 1 D 9� 661 75 0 06/ 0E/ 89 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTIL. 1830 CORDL . . . _ ._ ....... ...... ._. ..._.- . .._-.-. ._.. ._ . _-._.. __ _ __ _ __. _� . .. 3,563• 49 s�r UTIL 2925 WHBEAR 145.54 — !s3 ,zy r U1' [ L 1 902 CCRDa , 5 � 9. l 5 rC � UTIL 1 97 5 M A NT � Vi 2 .7 5 �;''j���, ,�64rl$ , 1 UTIL 1 600 MYRTLE � O UTIL 2500 7 "rH 'S'T 2.75 rA 4 U'F I L 345 CEN i URY 83 r 37 i UTIL 1501 GENEVA j r ..__. _ .. ...._... ._v_ _.M .. ,.�_... ._ .__ _ ._. 1 UTIL 1 ►3 5 0 G CRD D 11 0 ,! _ UTIL 2251 WH13EAR 106.05 UTIL 2268 C0N . iAY. 157.70 ,�f V 0 U C H (-Z E IS C 11' (1f: 1IAPLEw00D PAGE 10 I T E R E C 13 0 6 / 0 1 1 `815) 14 4 3 V 0 LJ CHIE r,", V 0 U C. i i E R / C H EVE. C K V F.-N D 01=t C HE C K NUMBER N LJ M.8, E R DATE V E N D 0 R N A tyl E 1093 -6. 6 1 -'="-'0 0 06 / {i8 /,:_'r' NORTHLAND IDL.NT 1094 662600 06'1/08/S9 NORWEST INVESTME N -F�-; S E R V I C'. E S 1095 6510400 0c: /08 9 OLSON 7 GIE OFF 1096 7* 0 05, () 0 () 6 / 0 �,P� *.< I SOLUTIONS 1097 71 1 345 0 6 / 0 6 9 P L-- T 4. f-,i SC) N ; B I_'-- L L. I C 0 hl V F.- WS'E J E. N S E N 1093 7 1 *&'---, 105 0 0" / Q E-i I PITNEY �,()WES 10 9 9 721175 0 C's 1/ 0;-:, p R Ll C. 0 k 6 562 . 3 2, 1 �10 0 06/08 6.60 C"I 1 740 00 0 0 , /:,:r ri. A -rt) 0 S HACK UTIL 1 r 6 D E N C., N T 0 o UTIL &' 0 1. BE AIM I I �38 7 1 0 0 Lz R A Ni ic" k. Y C L 1 N 1' C U T1 L 4 0 1. 7TH ST . 3 0 . 1*'.---' 4 1105 74'°.110 0 C" / 0 8 9 R A lyi S E Y EM R G M 1) 1 C. A L SIEERV 11' C", L 1106 761 � 0 o 0 6 0 8 / ROAD RESr.L.IE 1107 x•6-,1300 0 6 0'----, / 1, 1 1- F-1 F-*,'O A D R U N N C r% 110 7 7 0 0 0 8 / L-D R Y C. 0 SUPPLY Civet. I T E 11 C H E C K E'S C. R I 10N A MO LJ N T A MO LJ N T UT I L .2 LJ T I L e"I'.3-5- S W H E-.'E Ilk R 80.03 U -r I L .24-64. H B E':� 'A R W 141.1.0. UT I L '215 W I 1'EBE 4 U T I L 1 30 C OR D B' 6 562 . 3 UTIL 618 FARRELL 6.60 UTIL 618 FA N Ri­:' L. L 15-36 UTIL 1 r 6 D E N C., N T 41.94 UTIL &' 0 1. BE AIM 71 9$*" UTIL 101 ARCADE' -J 0 U T1 L 4 0 1. 7TH ST . 3 0 . 1*'.---' 4 UTIL 1940 N . ST . PA 399 .40 UTIL I.-i9 7TH %S� T 17. 8' 1. UTIL -2 7T H ` T 2 7 1:2� 2 b84 . r. R E i"A I R 11A 1111 -f B 3&-'1- . 00 31t-*-*... 00 PRIN01PAL PAYMENTS bsO36-56 51036.56. T R A V E'-': L. TRAINING 765.,16 7 65 1 R E P A 1t4 �--3: M A IN /E 50 .00 —5 0. Q 0- MAY RE-fA1Nk.'*.'R 64.00 64 .U0 C: r • T F I L M Q 5. o FIL,141 PROCESISING 52 . a. 0 F I L.11 P F-W C Ei"51231 N G- 13.00 71 .05 F R CiCiRAM SUPPLIES 3 1 . 8 2:' 3 1 8 FEEUS FOR SERVICE 4 00 46.00 MIT C E tyl AT!.- - R I A L 9 C),-/ . o 0 1 LEGAL. -33. F 13 %*'.-'. A L 34.10 943 . 10 %.JUPPLIES EQi.LJ.IP 74 . 0 -%.,.7 01 0- S U P FA L I EZ7J V C. HI C.'-- L. L 80.00 IE40 . 00 F E1:.;=; FOR SERV I C-E 19 .4:,,.o 19.60 V►:�LsC: i-1R,EG I T C1 telAF'L.r W0►::►D PAGE 11 {�} 1 _ =� `:r 1 :�; V ►:1 L 1 ', h! E: R .'` �. H E t I' : R E r`- I '�_ '- ' 6 t ..J { F. F' i R , r. R 10 D 0 5 V0tiC :1iER� CHECK VENDOR C H ii C. t C. H E C: K HU!'r!%,ER NUM :I,ER DATE MANE D k_.RI P T z ► :. ►H AM►:ii}i1"I AMOUNT 1 0r , 7 10 r 0 0 / i 8 ; � F ' = � T A T 1 : h R Y D E R I R A N S � L " Z 7 E RENT � � F � U i � � � ■ � �1 OUTISIDE t EN..1' EQUIF' 'Z,=:,.00 0UTw I D1. RE:NT E ►:,U1•r-` 300. 00 76: .00 j + 1 1 1 0 i », t } 'T 8 1 � i.1. �_} 0 / i`, S -� ,", t } % t l t } r } I �s �' f� Si f_ .t ( j ("' r� ,.i •�Sl �.J 5»• � i ? � 1 { tiJ i.,.' t t.'i j j , +..+ ( r.. {_t F 1 � I: ; ;i3 � l r1 I T I �.! { J � i {� i. 1:� , J 117 w 9 1 ' =1 .,. ■ r .l 1 790500 0 (; �! 0 ,:;r / 8:? SCIENCE M U S" E U f' i OF M I N N L: 1E: O 1 A VR A V E L 8.. 100.00 1 0 0 n 0 { "} l 1 1 ti. 8,y {_}6't {l {_} 06.! { " },i /i1'e SNAP—ON 1.QUi_PW»N•1 )F`UR�•f`Ii JE7f 1 71s ■�5 E ; �► Li :I F' I''! k i�# + F' i.1 Fi : H A � E D 8 : r ;i ' =a c' -, 1113 r_, • IS2";1!,c }c} r., ,fit 06 /c�r:!_�9 t^ t- r SPEC,•IALTY RADI►_► hEL-`AIh & �siCE RAD {t —. 37w {_ }0 —, 1 1 1 4 . 831600 06/08 SFS OFFICE PRODUCT S�U(I- *rP1.1 ES C, f." F 1" 10.40— /C S U F' F' L I E v OFF 11..• E U'PF'L.1 E:S — OFF ICE 75.00 = �UF'PI._ I E: 0F y= I C:E 87 . 6 1 SUPPLIES O 'F'IC:E 7.42 UPP L. I E, OFF I I" E 45.93 SUPF —1. ES OF 1�.E :1��r�.�wf S' U F' F' i_. I i:_ S 0 i' F' r' ,»r �• J �- .fit . E ; SUPPLIES .1-'F IC: 5 78 ;3 S UPF'LI►` S OFFICE 16..8 0 UF'F'LIF:'E OF FICE 17.50 SUPPLIE'.3p OF FIC:E 24.70 S' UF'F'L.I ES C►F` F- I4 1 8.41 U F'r1L L i. � �S F l� I wE I Ell ■ 0 0 - S U F' F' L I ES. O F F= I C. 312'. 1 0 707.90 1115 840:_;00 06/08/89 ST . PAUL BOOK ST AT 10N UNIT= ORMZ) & C:LOTH M f Y �� M r 87d" J 1 1 1 r. 840-100 0 6, 0 ,: , =, M, 11� t: MATERIAL 11 660 . 6 0 _ FEES FOR SF F'tV I C:1_ 6t;} TF;A*1 EL »: TRAIN 100.00 21615.32'. 1117 t ,� , t 4 05 0 06/08/89 E r . F A U L DISPATCH F I C r ! � — E � FOR' � � F V ICE 12 4 , F1 + L I I 1 J i.� • �s rat ■ rr r .s 16 s 4 ills 84190 {w} �jr", /i };�/; =,9 :STANDARD hEGI;= ;� "r'Eh �;lJF-'F'L1E.�► �'►r�'f�ICE :_47. '3 UPF' L I LS Of• F• I CE: r 3 4 3'.1 498.80 11100.52 111 -r 84,_ '_tr} {_ }�- , /c. }, ^t; �, -� S r A � E C:HE1•II� AL MAN7.J(��AC: t 1I�,.�!��t::i ��U J A N I { C1R1AL 90 79 11 �:. {,j `'� •: ; �_ {_} ! i f l r�t (,1 ��� / tw, ;f _ _ M ._. f-' ; ' _ N � .t {� . t ' 1 it S� �! t lJ i' �' �_ J. �r !'} t } �' ;�, a : 7 "► {a i c:? "� 1 = '=f .r Fi L I �. N F:1* : G Li IN '::; r Li F' �'' 1.. 11� �: (4 �`� I`1 r ! 184.50 r i;iiUC . H R E G 6 / 0 1 V 0 Ll CH E R ;...HECK NUMBER 14, 43 V [*:'N D 0 f-j C H 1- C-) VENDOR NUM' ER DA T E N A trl E Q 9 0 0 5 0 0 o U11GAR, BEV 0 0 0 UN I FOR U N L il I f E 11 �7? '1134 900600 06/08/89 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL 1135 900700 0 6 / 0 8 UNIVER12:'PITY W FLORIDA 11,.,:,,6 9 0 0 5 06/08/89 UNIVERIC-'11TY OF MINNESOTA 1, 1 1-21, 7 901 tioo 06 0 8 / 89 US W 1 13:*--, r -, I -; 3 0 - 06/()8/s:'# r- 'N A L. WAI.L STRC.E'T JOLIN 113 Cl? 940575 06 /01 8 9 W;-,-1 SS, RICHARD 114 0 940700 0 C'. / 0 8 WESCO 1141 4'.L' 'c', 0 0 0 6 / 0;'., /-8, 9 WINFIELD 142 33 0 0 943 o / o--.'/ Wl N TER D 0 F-'Z, E E N 1143 950 12 -5 06/08/89 WOOD"'URY CITY OF .1144 1-170,700 06/oS/8,9 YOCUM OIL CO. 5 d- 16 0 2 4 a 50 71EGLER INC. le. ; V 0 L (C H U P / (."P F1 1 RE 1 3 T E R I TEN T E L. E F-` H () N ll. P RO G R A N R E G Ll 1\1 I F OR ty! Z"J L (.'I T H 11114 G U N I F 0 R'M U N I F OR 11 C L OT H I N G U N 1 0 R M'S* C 1-10 1-11 1\1 G Ll iNll F 0 N lyl 1-3' C L, H 1 N G Li A j*..j T F Cl Rlyl S C L 0 T 111 N (:41 TRA'%TIEL TRAIN T E L E P 1-10 N E P R G R A M f E F Si S U f-'I" L I E %S JAN I T 0 R G . A L F' I AL P IN t_-i (--t i-ZA M RE Ci F* E TRAVEL & HZAIN TRAVEL & TFZ/-`, I N. f --' f -' 1. - I !L:-' S J A Ni TO R V E., Fl C. .. r- S LIP P L I E S) L V J. I- J T OTA L CHrE'-' C. K' S AW PAGE 13 H E C:1•: A 1Y1 0 i 3 NT A I'l 0 U •--J i 0 6 3 4 1. 6" 4 2-' 9.00 0 0% B, I .70 110.9(l) t5i 3 . 05 0 0 1 -3, 4.1 1 -: 1 . 12. 1 4 . 4.00 ice+ . 00 85 . 00 34 30.01 113 . '8'5 1 0 0 1 r7l 0 1) 151 00 15.00 7 5 C& 3 75.63 57, 0 0 0 570 . 00 0 9.00 10 6 6 5 d- 16 0 2 4 a 50 4.50 9 7 8 682. 17 41.7.15- 319 .99- 43 .4,---, 454, 145 65 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 05/19/89 CHECK #8652 - CHECK #8814 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY SLAVIK, THOMAS J. 11107.70 McGUIRE, MICHAEL A. 21634.46 BLACKSTONE, GAIL 11469.30 ZAWACKI, KATHRYN 11004.50 BEHM, LOIS N. 11034.10 JAHN, DAVID J. 903.28 SWANSON, LYLE 11043.92 CODE, LARRY J. 276.80 OSTER, ANDREA J. 902.28 MIKISKA, WILLIAM 172.80 FAUST, DANIEL F. 21033.30 TAYLOR, LINDA 11050.28 MATHEYS, ALANA K. 11083.88 VIGNALO,.DELORES A. 11083.88 ANDERSON, CAROLE J. 11243.88 LA MOTTE, MARLENE 182.00 AURELIUS, LUCILLE E. 11878.90 SELVOG, BETTY D. 238.00 SCHADT, JEANNE L. 11029.48 KELSEY, CONNIE L. 556.30 VIETOR, LORRAINE S. 972.69 HENSLEY, PATRICIA A. 562.01 JAGOE, CAROL 739.33 CAROE, JEANETTE E. 902.73 OLSON, SANDRA 506.83 COLLINS, KENNETH V. 21084.50 RICHIE, CAROLE L. 954.28 SVENDSEN, JOANNE M. 11096.76 NELSON, ROBERT D. 11800.50 FULLER, ELAINE 366.34 OMATH, JOY E. 972.68 MARTINSON, CAROL F. 936.68 ZAPPA, JOSEPH A. 11309.08 STILL, VERNON T. 11378.28 SKALMAN, DONALD W. 11442.72 FRASER, JOHN 689.43 NELSON, CAROL M. 11511.08 MORELLI, RAYMOND J. 11355.20 STEFFEN, SCOTT L. 11441.81 ARNOLD, DAVID L. 11561.48 BANICK, JOHN J. 11410.13 BOHL, JOHN Co 11486.36 CAHANES, ANTHONY G. 11800.50 CLAUSON, DALE K. 11403.88 MOESCHTER, RICHARD M. 11481.55 ATCHISON, JOHN H. 11403.88 YOUNGREN, JOHN 11621.82 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 05/19/89 CHECK #8652 - CHECK #8814 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY PELTIER, WILLIAM F. 11561.48 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J. 11327.08 WELCHLIN, CABOT V. 11357.72 LANG, RICHARD J. 1,403.88 RAZSKAZOFF, DALE 11454.29 HERBERT, MICHAEL J. 11454.28 DREGER, RICHARD C. 11561.48 STAFNE, GREGORY L. 12455.66 BECKER, RONALD D. 11507.95 HALWEG, KEVIN R. 11561.48 STOCKTON, DERRELL T. 11378.28 PAULOS, JR., PAUL G. 11187.80 BOWMAN, RICK A. 11327.08 KARIS, FLINT D. 11390.28 HEINZ, STEPHEN J. 1,415.88 GRAF, DAVID M. 11467.08 THOMALLA, DAVID J. 11403.10 PALMA, STEVEN T. 11237.56 VORWERK, ROBERT E. 11467.08 BERGERON, JOSEPH A. 11390.28 MEEHAN, JAMES 11507.97 MELANDER, JON A. 11467.08 SAUNDERS, SARAH 686.54 EMBERTSON, JAMES M. 11538.10 WILLIAMS, DUANE J. 17354.90 RABINE, JANET L. 11133.27 STAHNKE, JULIE A. 11029.48 BOYER, SCOTT K. 999.88 WALDT, CYNTHIA 844.98 RYAN, MICHAEL P. 11676.86 FEHR, JOSEPH 804.68 NELSON, KAREN A. 11125.60 FLAUGHER, JAYME L. 11067.88 WEGWERTH, JUDITH A. 502.73 HAIDER, KENNETH G. 21084.50 CHLEBECK, JUDY M. 11087.88 MEYER, GERALD W. 11264.44 KANE, MICHAEL R. 11342.28 NAGEL, BRYAN 907.74 LUTZ, DAVID P. 17340.73 KLAUSING, HENRY F. 11231.08 SCHMOOCK, JOHN 11101.76 HELEY, RONALD J. 11166.04 OSWALD, ERICK D. 11259.56 FREBERG, RONALD L. 11161.00 CASS, WILLIAM C. 11704.68 LINDBLOM, RANDY 11067.98 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 05/19/89 CHECK #8652 - CHECK #8814 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY ELIAS, JAMES G. 11334.28 PECK, DENNIS L. 11334.28 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 11517.87 IRISH, BRUCE A. 11635.08 GESSELE, JAMES T. 1,688.93 GEISSLER, WALTER M. 17334.42 METZ, TERRY 11304.91 LOFGREN, JOHN R. 959.32 ODEGARD, ROBERT D. 11878.90 BRENNER, LOIS J. 11131.55 KRUMMEL, BARBARA A. 486.34 STAPLES, PAULINE 11642.28 JONES, L. 72.00 BOWES, WILLIAM 327-.50 TRAVERS, D. 99.00 ANDERSON, ROBERT S. 11100.68 LINDORFF, DENNIS P. 17223.34 GARRY, WILLIAM 917.48 HELEY, ROLAND B. 11175.88 MARUSKA, MARK A. 11465.96 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 818.28 BURKE, MYLES R. 11197.48 .SHELDON, LEO 91.25 HANNEGAN, A. 63.00 DREGER, KARI 100.00 WEINHANDL, K. 162.50 MCGIVERN, J. 72.50 DAMIANI, R. 150.00 GRAF, M. 171.20 PODPESKAR, KIMBERLY J. 76.25 GREEN, G. 160.00 VAN WYK, K. 50.00 HERBER, T. 80.00 ANDERSON, C. 60.00 BESETH -JR, RONALD 130.00 NELSON, J. 60.00 FISCHER, PATRICIA 55.00 WARD, ROY G. 406.40 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. 11372.68 GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M. 11157.48 NELSON, JEAN 437.30 HORSNELL, JUDITH A. 567.95 HUTCHINSON, ANN E. 789.14 FISHER, L. 140.00 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M. 11038.92 BARTA, MARIE L. 936.69 OLSON, GEOFFREY W. 11878.90 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 05/19/89 CHECK #8652 - CHECK #8814 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY MISKELL, NANCY 328.59 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L. 490.58 GENEROUS, ROBERT 333.20 ROBERTS, KENNETH 11010.28 EKSTRAND, THOMAS G. 11492.47 OSTROM, MARJORIE 11563.08 CARVER, NICHOLAS N. 11187.88 WENGER, ROBERT J. 11286.29 LACASSE, CASEY 273.00 NADEAU, EDWARD A. 11225.82 MULWEE, GEORGE W. 11152.68 NUTESON, LAVERNE.S. 11536.68 BREHEIM, ROGER W. 11217.45 EDSON, DAVID B. 11174.28 GERMAIN, DAVE 1,174.28 MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 11288.68 SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 11053.48 $169,607.81 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION AFSCME 2725 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Z1 $ 71251.62 C1 24,259.00 U1 483.83 160.00 U3 18.00 Z2 238.00 I1 525.41 $ 32,410.45 GRAND TOTAL $202,018.26 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 05/18/89 -CHECK #8837 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY ------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- SLAVIK, THOMAS J. 436.32 $ 436.32 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK #1 $ 47.56 MN STATE COMM OF REVENUE ST 19.03 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK (FICA) ;1 32.77 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK (FICA);l 32.77 $ 132.13 GRAND TOTAL $ 568.45 TO: FROM SUBJECT* LOCATIO : APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas Ek strand q Associate Planner Conditional Use - Permit Renewal 1810 E . County Road B Roger Fulk Fulk Manu-factLtring,; Inc. May 229 1989 SUMMARY Action by Council:i Endorsed ]ReJected- Dat F - The applicant is requesting renewal of a conditional use permit for an M-1, light manufacturing use within 350 feet of a residential zones BACKGROUND On February 27, 1989, Council renewed this CUP and gave the appl icant three months to construct an eight-foot -tal I screening fence between the original shop building and the - shed to hide trash containers. DISCUSSION All conditions of this CUP have been met* RECOMMENDATION Renewal of a conditional use permit for five years for a machine shop within 350 feet of a residential district at 1810 East County Road B, subject to Council's previously imposed conditions of approval,, REFERENCE PAST ACTION Council originally granted a CUP building on September 109 1979. newer concrete block shop b u i l d i i Four renewals were granted. The approval are a. The hours of operation shall a.m. and 10:00 p.m. for the applicant's first A CUP was issued for the ng on February 13, 1984. present conditions of generally be between 5:00 be All equipment and machinery shall be stored indoorso co All fire safety regulations shall be meta do All junk vehicles and any other miscellaneous debris shall be removed from the p remises o Adherence to the site pl an dated January 61 1984, unless a change is approved by the City's Community Design Review Boards 2s On January 24, 1984, the Community Design Review Board conditionally approved the site plan for this projects Condition two required that if the trash dumpster. is kept outside, it shall be stored in masonry enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate according to ordinance, and shal I be a color and material compatible with the buildings Location and design shall be subject to staff approvals 3W On January 25, 1988, Council renewed this CUP for six months, subject to am Landscaping being installed in accordance with the approved plane be Trash enclosures as required by code, or the construction of an eight-f oot-tallg 100% opaque decorative wood screening fence between the original shop building and the shed to the south. All trash containers shall be kept between these two buildings* The construction of the fence is an interim remedy for screening. Total screening of all trash receptacles may be required in the future, depending on the development of the adjacent lot to the southwest" 4o On October 24, 1988, Council granted a three-month renewal of the CUP and gave the applicant three months to have a screening fence constructed to hide trash containers* ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Subsection 36-187 (b) No building or exterior use, except parking, shall be erected, altered or conducted within 350 feet of a residential district without a conditional use permits 0 Subsection 36-442 (e) states the following& All conditional . use permits shall be reviewed by the Council within one year of the date of initial approval unless such decision or ordinancen At the one review is waived by Council year review, the Council atay spec i+y an indefinite term or specific termg not to exceed five (5) years, for subsequent reviews. The Council may impose new .or, additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent rev iewss A . conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the City from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets the agreed upon conditions and is later disallowed because of the City enacting or amending official controls shall be considered a legal nonconforming use= nim/Ful k.mem (4.2) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Original Site/Landscape Plan original 3 .E� W K O N L A A N AVE. ."• . • ._.....r Cr dd Q23 h v EOGEHILL RO. at 65 •� _ h _ 0EU0k T AY E-lWJ, : . W w C'm RQ CK AVE .� �i A � A 1116 AvE. W 0 �• , . SEX V E. VAI R�,AI AV ?' 0 HMEW AV ..CURT 3E ANERREN AYE nv"�' aREN oE r AVE. OPE AVE. LARK AVE. �,; L�.. L1RK AVE. 21 (LAURIE] R0. s ILAURIE RD l '< ------� s I W w 25 1 SAHO 11HUR51 J c W sd n 8 Y > Cc AVE AU KE l� it t11.: / ELONIDG AVE. 4,0 r% x000 (i A DUBLtC �YOnKS � I BELMON r AVE. N d 6 W eL�- LS KILL MA M o AVE. _ NA A13 A� ROS FOOD AVE. RY LAN 4 �`�' *Jt �' •.•1 29 �lu L-"j M L fl 5 J ER J w a �' � 5 s+ 1 Woh a /i a /d ' -- E... X AYE on AV E f►- LoA e c z I -nE L W = Z 3 = _t [PRICE z AvE E AV GJ > < �" CE ,• A V I F-1 1 71- 1 F- If~1f -1� LOCATION MAP ' Attachment 1 4 N 7 P r 14 1 1850 in 11� iii FULK MANUFACTURING, INC. or !,i /it'1t i - v CI � t-� pq ♦ n pq IA 2- o .............. t PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP '�- 5 Attachment 2 wir Ki nney Shoe UJ lip F1 3 --Or ol ou . ... ..... IL Do BC LO 7 P r 14 1 1850 in 11� iii FULK MANUFACTURING, INC. or !,i /it'1t i - v CI � t-� pq ♦ n pq IA 2- o .............. t PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP '�- 5 Attachment 2 St a 4P Op —.• �ri • n� County Road 8 _.' rli• �• • .- •• • `.•••..r ....• •...• • •..•1 1.•— . •• r•..� • r •r� ••i � •�• r r.��..._•�w f .a•.�.�•�� r. .,�•.�.��... }..+ �• _.♦ 0 ✓� ..i.w�.r•...• ....... �Ij - _ • 1 • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • �• • •� ...• •• IMP ILI V US do Lr_ ,1 ` 1 • • //.f M ..� •• +. r do, Vt Exleting 7 Spruce '.•� ZI �� I •� tiOlfr I V..t �.•.��'« 1 ,/t`•II ��� .• It Ifni o`0 House I•r• � � ••`� >t►.tn ro �' •!••:.�� .!..1'•,:� •err ;,.� �• : • � 1 • ..�. In LLJ Do • - 1r .•� .• •�r ►��:• ���� /�', >1�I.N•` New Shop • � 1 J •• i.•,• �,1 • •• .1 tools- II�L •' I < 1 �• C• /I V . I• ••• • •i 11.. 1 • • i •` .� •� / • . 11.1 ✓•' ,1 1' 1 'r yI •�� �••••••,•••1 •i ` V) Q CY- • l V IF a so �( � f ..`1 it • "♦ 1 1� . I'� �111i1 -:A CY,>� • •• ,•�.i' �tl?' i� C�� .` { • � . i • 1 . �, • •1 M—y--�• % I W c ti:�► I i s • n l •.. A We EA T77 • �. „ 9 •' . �� ...{ O 00 1 f � O � 11 Or i g i na l Shop w B u i ldi n •-j o.. ' • . f 1 • <- on • � 11 i • I • P% - 1 1 'i In n•1 � Re I�•,r..•�KI .cJ ;� q u r c. 01 FX . el t Garage , ' . ; �; . 8 —f oot —taI 1 ►► screening fence • � � • •' .. • 1) 11'1 L) - Shod � � . � � �,^ �• ••1, +111 � � 1 iv k'1 t °• ' �� tom` Required storage area for trash SITE PLAN 6 Attachment 3 4 N il E -3 Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed.. TO: City manager Modifi ed�..,_,�._...�.. FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: : Rl ann ing Commissioner Resignation Rejected DATE: April 249 1 989 ?3ate A letter of resignation from the Planning Commission is attached from Frank Dempsey. Also attached is a resolution of appreciation. RECOMMENDATION .Accept the resignation and approve the attached resolution* mb Attachments: 1. Letter 2. Resolution .,APR 1 9 1994 April 17, 1989 Planning commission Members City Council Members City of Maplewood To all Planning Commission and City Council members: I wish to thank you all for giving me the opportunity to serve on the Planning commission in our wonderful city for the past fifteen months. Without a doubt, the experience has enabled me to further my career in City Planning* am sorry to announce my resignation from the Plannin g Commission, I y however, I am pleased to announce my being chosen to be the new city t Planner for the City of Northf ield. I will be the staf f representative for their Planning Commission meetings and some City Council meetings. The meetings all fall on a Monday night. I have gained considerable experience serving as a.Planning Commissioner here in Maplewood and I feel this will help me immensly in the future. M Y wife and I will continue to live in Maplewood for some time until we are ready to purchase a home, either here or in Northfield. Again, I want to thank you for giving me the opportunity to play an active part in the City of Map g �• lewood's future. Sincerely, � ..-t eqll A. ft� m Frank A. Dempsey y Z Attachment 1 ;OItV7 i2ESOLLl7IUN 07 APPi2ECIA7I0N f [hem ,se has Been a memo o/ the Aeann to ► Comm. zzion o/ IJH����.S, wank � y • .i?u Q � ewood, Ninnwia - n.ce. ;anuaay 25, 1988, and ha,6 waved ,� tey in • 9 8 9 • and that capacity unt ii Apaii 17, 1 , l ljelEE lS, jhc Pjann.incg Comm i.6 13ion hays apps -tecia -ed hiz expe4 -ien ce, .cn 6 i yhtz and good judgmzmt; and WHEREAS, he has 14"-iy given o/ h ih Lime and ermag y, wii h o u,t comp en /s a�. on, /oz �h.e 9etteAmvLt o/ Lh.e City o/ Map.-wood; and IJHEREAS, he hays 6hown z.inceze ded -ication. to hi ,6 duties and has conz.i�&rz t iy conlAiguted hi-6 .QeadeasUpl time and e //o a t /on the gene /a o/ the city.* y, NOW, 7hEIR o�R�, L34E 17 IOR6BY RESOLVED /c�& rand on gehail o/ the C-il y o Ala &-wood M4jV' Ze sota, and .ids c ' en s, iha - flank Dempzey -ins hezeAy extended ouz hea/tt /e& y2a�i�de and appAcciati-on /o2 hi .6 dedica-ted �se�v.cce and we wi.6h him coed 6uc ce ,6,s in -the IuY-ulzzv a,6aed &y the Cvunc.i2 v/ the City y o/ (7apiewo vd .th.i a day o/ , 79890 John C. g1teavu, Majo2 Comm.i.,6h-ion. o/ .tJt.e City v/ llap.2ewoocl .fh.vs 151h day o/ may, 19890 L.e teA g. Axdahi, Chai./z rman Luci -f-ze 69 Aug tiu -6t UE Planning Commission OW07- Minutes 5-15-89 +41 All 'Present outbuildi s associated with the exis't * n%g dwelling sh I be removed. The ex i.st i� g dwel I ing all be removed or relocated to meet\setback- r uirements on Lot 7, Block 2., or if th * S dwel I * ng is to remain in its present location, the 1. is to the north shall be adjusted- s a 1-+oot rear-yard setback can be met. from th proposed north lot line. Dedicatl'0, Of Utl of A and Lot 1 BI ock- I to the City for a ark ing lot for Vista Hills Park I i eu o partc, avai I ab i I ity chargesS h The ity awarding ontracts for the Sterling Str et improvement roject or the developer c structing sanitar sewer to the existing anitary -sewer in Lin ood Avenue. i in Deeding Outlot B to the City, n ty. Commi sioner Sletten seconded yes--Ax dahl Ayers, r C r rett , Cardinal F 0 la., Fischer, La La son Sigmundik Sletten D 0 Resignation Commissioner Ayers moved the Planning Comm issi on recommend acceptance of the resignation of Frank Dempsey as a member of the Planning Commission and approval of the resolution of appreciation. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes--Axdahl Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal Fiolaq Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik Sletten E Comprehensive Plan Work Session Secretary Olson discussed with the commissioners scheduling a date-.in June for a work session to begin Updating the comprehensive plan, VII. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS An Council Meetings: April 6 and 10; 20 and 24; May 4 and 8 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLI CANT/ OWNER: PROJECT: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Time Extension (PUD) County Road B and English Street Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. Caves English Street Second Addition May 25, 1989 SUMMARY 5- �/ Action by Counoil . Modified, Raj Date The applicant is requesting a one-year time extension for Cave's English Street Second Addition planned unit development. BACKGROUND The applicant has constructed four of the five planned single- family dwellings along the east side of English Street. There have not been any changes in City Code or surrounding land uses since the project received it's original approval and subsequent time extensions that would appear to affect this PUD. Thus there does not appear to be reason to justify denial or amendment of the conditions of approval. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 36-442:�' (e) of the City Code states that "all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the Council within one year of the date of the initial approval , unless such review is waived by Council decision or ordinance. At the one-year review, the Council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five (5) years, for subsequent reviews. The Council may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time- of the initial or subSequent reviews." DISCUSSION The PUD received it's final plat approval on August 8, 1986. It has since received one-year time extensions in 1987 and 1988. According to the applicant, the timing for the construction of the condominiums is unclear due to a strong market for single.family homes and uncertainties in the market for other types of housing. Approve a one-year time extension for Cave's English Street Second Addition planned unit development subject to the original conditions of approval. Attachments 1 . Location at on Mzip 2.. Property Line/Zonirig Map 3w Site Plan 2 —maw'. • • • n w •ice - . . �.� • . . ° • 1 In • • t jp • ••, �• • •• •� • MAW tonsil Eno IMMI maim me low am -• � • s �. .. � � ♦ 1111 I,••r � = • s �+ fit. _� d Emil Aeolis ii ware"• �MM . f. wim LAND USE PLAN SHER WOOD GLEN 3 Attachment 1 4 N iM Jn t 12 0 41 Vi 11� - �a L75' O O ° ( TSj3 f� d l �1 C13� fry `LI 240' f 233.E =3 ►� � Opined Doe 1641446 /iS�'6S O 4ptnoJ Zbc.1626944 $ %po�b4 w - w • • • -- fn Al N it '� •. 425' ._ i. • 0 15-* 17 h l7 /.p4 59.z 10 (64) (63 ) \1 Z io 5) i8 o 40 3 3 40' .. �« 171 -0 Do, 3144 ,fA- � (54) n A (4) 13 -- T 0 0 a z1 22 2 3_ �4 1 4.5 d� 7 `9 12 N t l t O 9 8 '1 76. i5' 40 •• 3 Z 1 '�' w° `''' C 75 J/ O D9** ! D 9 8^ 7 to 6 3 2j I R t A. i. • 0 15-* 17 h l7 /.p4 59.z 10 (64) (63 ) \1 Z io 5) i8 o 40 4 `o . 6 � � -76 N on Ito f ���) N AVE. 'v (eo I ) - --- 7. D 140 4 �f ,fry' S V 7 Lli 2 I (ls) 5 rod h --� Z 74. O Cl / h� d20 G ^o a oc " ('0)b .� ^� (74) 14 ("r's - N c 73� . V c 5 0 a �) t z 0, 400 � (69 -9) t� 15( ) 2 ♦8,47 v 13 14 IS 16 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 If � ( Z ,. A l �72 = W c4 O s4.3 40 ,, ,. 46 4 e3 D o �s •. 8 8a �. a �s `, ROAD _ 7 4 4490 e, 7 a r 4 0• • ��2 n V .ZoLILL 1. X14 r X14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2 1 Co 60 �� o - -� 3 Co ---� -- - 'DLL I _._ (4 v 15 I(a 17 16 19 zC K 40 12 v 13 14 15 0 0 a z1 22 `9 12 N t l t O 9 8 '1 76. i5' 40 •• 3 Z 1 .. h 15 14 4.0 4 `o . 6 � � -76 N on Ito f ���) N AVE. 'v (eo I ) - --- 7. D 140 4 �f ,fry' S V 7 Lli 2 I (ls) 5 rod h --� Z 74. O Cl / h� d20 G ^o a oc " ('0)b .� ^� (74) 14 ("r's - N c 73� . V c 5 0 a �) t z 0, 400 � (69 -9) t� 15( ) 2 ♦8,47 v 13 14 IS 16 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 If � ( Z ,. A l �72 = W c4 O s4.3 40 ,, ,. 46 4 e3 D o �s •. 8 8a �. a �s `, ROAD _ 7 4 4490 e, 7 a r 4 0• • ��2 n V .ZoLILL 1. X14 r X14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2 1 Co 60 �� o - -� 3 Co ---� -- - 'DLL I _._ (4 v 15 I(a 17 16 19 zC K 40 s1 3o d �1 5kA �(77) �yG i i3o � � s WO n (7 O 7 v 8 � ; D h 39 a i 7O l7 m N � r� Q 238.91 / �8 � (13� IS 16 17 18 I' to 21 21 23 24 2 2� S �0 (14) 05) t� 40 .. • • of ,, n 46 4 �, � • • •. "'VAR; . � n - A � t z. , a 0 • 10 `9 12 N t l t O 9 8 '1 fo S 4 3 Z 1 h 15 14 13 7 6 S R t s1 3o d �1 5kA �(77) �yG i i3o � � s WO n (7 O 7 v 8 � ; D h 39 a i 7O l7 m N � r� Q 238.91 / �8 � (13� IS 16 17 18 I' to 21 21 23 24 2 2� S �0 (14) 05) t� 40 .. • • of ,, n 46 4 �, � • • •. "'VAR; . � n - A � t z. , a PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N 0 • 10 °- ;w 9 t2-4 h 15 14 13 7 6 S R t ro3 3 4 S J ,Zo 3 - - - '' 1 1e 1 16 19 20 21 e2 23 24 2 �� �:� . ' 30 3t 1 1 D i T. N .6 2 10- 111 - - � J • 2652 S�' PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N N COmPt.ETE HomES \ •lb lb 4k lk t •. 1 • • •.•� mow,,,. , I , 1 . Go 44. ot w• • f 1 'f • • , `• �� •� vo Allo 4 10 • .. • fill 4b 4b dam► ,.».• N 1 • • f SITE PLAN 5 Attachment 3 4 N %ij •• �\ ' ol ol t I! l• ; Ij � l j• , z �• I t +. t SITE PLAN 5 Attachment 3 4 N Action by Council:, Endorsed-- MEMORANDUM Modif ied e Jected-,-- To: Michael A. McGuire,, City Manager ate' From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatiop. Subj: Donations To Maplewood Nature Center Datie: May 26, 1989 The Maplewood Nature Center has received two contributions for the nature center,, One contribution is from the Lawrence Kaiser Auxiliary-Post 8901 in the amount of $50,00, and the second do- nation is $200.00 from Weaver Elementary School. In the letter from the VFW Post 8901, they state "The majority of our membership are Maplewood residents and we have seen what a varied program you offer. Thank you," The contribution from Weaver School is to establish a Prairie Butterfly Garden in memory of former teacher Darlene Blumer. Letters acknowledging the gifts have been sent to their respec- tive donors., Recommendation It is requested that the City Council accept the $50.00 donation from T Lawrence Kaiser Auxiliary-Post 8901, and the $200.00 donation from the Weaver Elementary School, and place them in the Jim's Prairie Fund (403-814-323-4720). C: City Clerk e, '�,> Action by Council Endorsed .o. RESOLUTION Modified- Rejected NATIONAL NIGHT OUT - 1989 Date - WHEREAS, the National Town Watch Association is sponsoring the 6th Annual edition of a special, coast -to- coast community crime prevention event on August 8, 1989, called "National Night Out" - America'.s Night Out Against Crime; and WHEREAS, Maplewood plays an essential role assisting the Maplewood Police through, its cooperative crive prevention efforts in Maplewood and is supporting the "National Night Out" locally; and WHEREAS, it is important that all citizens in Maplewood be aware of the importance of crive prevention programs and the positive impact that their participation can have on reducing crime and drug abuse in our neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, "National Night Out" provides an opportunity for Maplewood to join together with thousands of other communities across the country in support of safer neighborhoods and to demonstrate the success of cooperative crime prevention efforts; and WHEREAS, neighborhood awareness, spirit and cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out' project and key components in helping the Maplewood Police Department to fight crime and drug abuse; NOW, THEREFORE WE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, do hereby call upon all of the Citizens of Maplewood to join the Maplewood Police Department and the National Town Watch Association in supporting and participating in the 6th Annual "National Night Out" on August 8th, FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT I, THE..MAYOR OF MAPLEWOOD,..do hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 8, 1989, as "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" in Maplewood, Minnesota. Mayor { SAMPLE NEWS RELEASE } NATIONAL NIGHT OUT. - AUGUST 8_ TH ; YOUR CITY /TOWN} TO SUPPORT 'AMERICA'S NIGHT OUT AGAINST CRIME' On the evening of August 8th, {YOUR CITY /TOWN} residents are being invited to join thousands of other communities across the U.S.A. in supporting a unique, coast -to -coast crime prevention event called NATIONALNIGHT OUT - America's Night Out Against Crime. The event, sponsored by the'National Town Watch Association and co-sponsored locally by the . { YOUR AGENCY /ORGANIZATION } , involved 18.5 million people last August. This 6th Annual NIGHT OUT will be the largest ever with 7,500 communities from all 50 states, U.S. Territories and military bases around the world participating. From 8 to 10 P.M., over 18, million people nationwide will lock their doors, turn -on outside lights, and spend the evening outdoors on porches, lawns, stoop, etc. Many neighborhoods throughout {YOUR CITY /TOWN} will be hosting special NIGHT OUT. activities such as block parties, rallies, parades, visits from police and local officials cookouts., candle and flashlight walks and youth crime prevention events. NATIONAL NIGHT OUT is designed to: (1) Heighten crime prevention awareness; (2) Generate support for, and participation in, local.anticrime programs; (3) Strengthen neighborhood spirit in the crime prevention campaign and; ` (4) Send a message to criminals Letting them know that neighborhoods across the USA are organized and fighting back. Na ' tional'Proect Coordinator Matt Peskin said , "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT is an � opportunity for neighborhoods nationwide to join forces to make a united and powerful statement against crime." ''Thirty 'or forty years ago," he added, po g communities were safer because people knew their neighbors, routinely looked -out for one another, and everyone knew the cop-on the beat. Today, many people do not even know neighbors. We want to turn the clock back and regain that sense of neighborhood spirit and camaraderie." The NATIONAL NIGHT OUT campaign has also been successful in helping to bring residents and police closer together. "Too often," Peskin said, "the police and the community meet under adverse conditions, if at all." "During NIGHT OUT each year, citizens and police take time -out and meet in a positive, festive atmosphere. The results are a stronger 'crime prevention team' and ultimately, a safer community. " - -> OFFER INFORMATION IN THIS PARAGRAPH ABOUT YOUR LOCAL NIGHT OUT PROGRAM. SPECIAL ACTIVITIES THAT ARE PLANNED .. HOW RESIDENTS CAN PARTICIPATE .. WHO THEY SHOULD CAN CONTACT FOR INFORMATION. 0 - For more information: (Optional contact): YOUR AGENCY - CONTACT PERSON PHONE # NATIONAL TOWN WATCH ASSOCIATION (215) 649 -7055 kim r0c, a NATIONAL NIGHT OUT - 1989 - --> SAMPLE < - -- • iatial. is sponsoring the 6th Annual � WHEREAS, the National Tb�wn Watch.. Assn po g edition of a special, coast -to -coast dcx= unity crime prevention event on August 81 1989 called "National Night Out" - America's Night Out Against Crime; and WHEREAS, {YCUR ORGANIZATION} plays an essential role assisting the { LOCAL pOLICE/ SHERIFF' S DEPARTMIE NT } through it's cooperative crime prevention efforts in {YWR CITY/ } and is supporting the National Night out" locally; and WHEREAS it is important that all citizens in {YOUR CITY /COUNTY} be aware of the importance of crime prevention programs and the positive impact that their participation can have on reducing crime and -drug abuse in our neighborhoods; and ~ WHEREAS "National Night Out" provides an opportunity for {YOUR CITY/COUNTY} to join together with thousands of other cammnities across the country in support of safer neighborhoods and to demonstrate the success of cooperative crime prevention efforts; and WHEREAS, neighborhood awareness, spirit and cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out" project and key components in helping the {LOCAL poLICE /SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT} to fight crime and drug abuse; NOW, I /WE, {MAYOR CR COMMISSIONERS) , do hereby -call upon all of the citizens of {YOUR CITY /COUNTY} to join {YOUR ORGANIZATION} and the National Town Watch Association in supporting and participating in the 6th Annual "National Night out" on August 8th. No FUR'T'HER I& IT BE RESOLVED THAT, I NE, {MAYOR OR CMUSSIONE]ZS } , do hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 81 1 989 as "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" in {YOUR CITY /CouNm . Secretary Clerk Mayor President , � � } ` AGENDA ITEM ------- ' AGENDA REPORT Action b- � Council:' TO: City Manager, .�~_�~��� FROM: Assistant City Engineer Endorsed ' Modified.... Rejected_- �e�~--�~�~�' SUBJECT: Walter Street, Project 84-14--Award of Bid --~ Dat DATE: June 5, 1989 Attached is a detailed tabulation of bids and summary for the 'subject. project. As of this date, no assessment appeals have been filed with district court. It is recommended that award of .',bid be made to Ro-So Contracting. ' It should be noted that temporary construction and slope easements have not been granted by the two property owners who appealed the assessments. In view of the circumstances, the 'easements may not be given, The side sl opes of the street can be reconfigured to keep the 'construct ion within the right-of-way. The boulevard area for snow storage will be restricted for about 100 feet on the east side if easements are not obtained. The ' project should still proceed. BAI jc Attachments TABULATION'', OF BIDS CITY OF MAPLEWO OD DEPARTMENT Of PUBLIC WORKS BIDS RECEIVED Mai =n 31 1989 RECORDED BY James T. ce : :eie • j 7 PROJECT WALTER STREET L 0 C A T 10 N Fenton Avenue to Frost Avenue PROJECT NO 84 -14 SHEET 1 OF 2 ITEM NO DESCRIPTION Q U AN T 1 TY Ro-So Contracting F. M. Frattal one Brown & Cris William B. Miller Lake Area Uti i i t Vcl k Sewer & Water UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 1 Clear and Grub Trees 0.25 AC ?1000.00 500.00 3,000- 00 750.00, 189.00 5.000.00 2.00 - 1, 2 50. 00 6. 000.00 2, 000. OC 4, 000.00 1, 000. OC 16.000.00 4, 000.00 2 Saw Cut Bituminous or Concrete 126.00 L.F. 1.00 126.00 1.50 252.00 1.00 126.00 2.50 315.00 2.70 340.20 3 Concrete Curb and Gutter Removal 94.00 L.F. 2.30 216.20 1.00 94.00 3.00 282.00 3.00 282.00 3.00 282.00 4 Water for Dust Control 1.00 M GA 50.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.0 25.00 25.00 40.00 40.00 Common Excavation 733.00 C.Y. 1 4.50 3,298.5 6.00 4,398.00 4 6 Granular Borrow 605.00 C.Y. 8.20 4,961.00 4.00 2.420.00 8.00 4.840.00 6.00 3.630.00 7.50 4.537.501 5.00 3.025.00 7 Topsoil Borrow 180.00 C. y. 10.00 1,800.00 6.00 1,080.00 2.00 360.00 7.00 1,260.00 7.00 1,260.001 8.66 1.558.80 8 Aggregate Base Class 5 692.00 T. 7.65 5.293.80 6.50 4,498.00 7.15 4,947.80 8.00 5 6 6.87 4 754.04; 9.45 6.539.40 9 2342 Bituminous Wear Course 214.00 T. 18,95. 4.055.30 20.00 4.280.00 15.50 3,317.001 20.74 4,438.36 10 AC Bituminous Material for Mixture 13.00 T. 135.00 11755.00 127.50 19657.50 122.00 1,586.00 125.00 11 625.00 137.00 1,781. 001 131.25 1,706.25 11 Bi-tuminows Material-for 15.00 GAL, 1.00 15.00 1.00 15.00 2.00 30.00 3.00 45.00 2.00 1 30.001 1.52 22.80 12 B616 Concrete Curb and Gutter 106.00 L.F. 17.50 1,855.00 8.00 848.00 15.00 1.590.00 12.00 1,272.00 12.00 1,272.001 12.00 1, 272.00 1.3 15" RCP Cl-ass 3 Storm Sewer 21.00 2,583.00 22.00 29706.00 23.00 2,829.00 24.00 2, 952.00 20.00 2,460.00', 25.00 3.075.00 14 Storm%Sewer Manhole 1.00 EA. 625.00 625.00 890.00 800.00 800.00 800.00 800.00- 1,000. GO 1.000.00 15 15" RCP Apron 1.00 EA. 365.00 365.00 275.00 275.00 430.00 430.00 425.00 425.00 350:00 350.00, 200.00 200.00 1 6 1 " RCP Apron s h Guard for 5 Trash 1.00 EA. 225.00 225.00 250.00 250.00 140 00 140 00 170.00 170.00 225.00 225.001 200.00 200.00 17 Adjust Sanitary Manholp 1.00 EA 150.00 150.00 125.00 125.00 150.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 110.00- 400.00 400.00 18 Reconstruct Storm Manhole 2.50 L.-F. 85.00 175.00 437.50 150.00 375, 150.00 375.00 80.00 200.00i 150.00 375.00 19 Adjust Gate Valve Boxes 3.00 EA. 100.00 300.00 95.00 285.00 150 450.0 80.00 240.00 100.00 i 150.00 450.00 20 Sodding 3.00 228.00 3.00 228.00 2.50 190.00 3.00 228.00 5.00 380.00i 3.41 259.16 21 ISeeding 0.43 AC. 400.00 172.00 1,200.00 516.00 500.00 215.008, 500- 00 1,505.00 2,000.00 860.00 498.75 214.46 22 Seed 22.00 LBS. 3.50 77.00 2.95 64.90 3.00 66.00 5.00 110.00 1 3.83 84.26 23 Mulch, Type 1 0.86 T. 125. 00 107.50 200.00 172.00 150.00 129. 00 300.00 258.00 350.00 ( 315.00 301.0 270.90 24 Commercial Fertilizer 0.11 T. 225.00 24.75 98.00 10.78 300.00 33.00 400.00 44.00 300.00 33.00- 367.50 40.43 25 Disc Anchoring 0.43 AC 200.00 86.00 25.00 10.7 OQ 43.00 100 i 105.00 45.15 i TABULATION. OF BIDS CITY OF' MAPLEWOOD DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BIDS RECEIVED March 31, 1989 RECORDED BY James T. Gessele PROJECT WALTER STREET LO CATION Fenton Avenue to Frost Avenue PROJECT NO. 84 -14 SHEET . 2 OF 2 I T E M NO DESCRIPTION QUANTITY Ro-So Contracting F. M. Frattal one Brown & Cri s William B. Miller Lake Area Uti 1 i ty' Volk Sewer & Water UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT t TOTAL 26 Hay /Straw Bale Checks 6.00 EA. 5.00 30.00 60.00 360.00 5.0 30.00 20.00 120.00 10.00 60.00 10. 00 60.00 27 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR -35 56.00 L.F. 50.00 2 800.00 90.0 0 04 5 0.00 3 1 0 1 736.00 24.00 1, 344.00 40.00 2,240.00 ; 50.00 2,800.00 28 4" PVC Sanitary Sewer Service N pe 90.00 L.F. 10.50 945.00 12.00 1,080.00 16.00 1,440.00 20.00 11800.00 17.00 1,530.00.4 1.800.00 29 4" DIP Sanitar Sewer Service Pie 80.00 L.F. 17 0 1 360 4 19.0 1 52 25.00 2, 000.00 20.00 1,600.00! 25.0 2.000.00, 30 8" x 4" PVC Wye, Schedule 40 3.00 EA. 100.00 300.00 35.00 105.00 175.Oc 525,Q0 30.00 90.00 40.00 120.001 100.00 300.00 31 Cor Saddle Taps to Sanitary Main 3.00 EA. 100.00 300.00 175.0 525.00 160.00 480.00 100.00 1 300.00: 600. OC 1,800.00 32 Replace sanitary Service Tap P Y 1.00 EA. 4 330.00 330.00 500.00 500.001 400.0 400.00 33 Connect to Existing Water Main 1.00 EA. 300.00 300.00 100.00 100.00. 560.00 560.00 400.00 400.00 1, 350.00 1 1,350.001 300. OC 300.00 34 8" SJ DIP Water Main, Class 52 413.00 L.F. 15.50 6,401.50 16.00 6,608.001 19.5C 8.053.50 16.00 6.608.00 19.00 7 47 20. OC 8,260.00. 35 6" SJ DIP Water Main, Class 53 10.00 L.F. 12.00 120.00 15.00 150.00 18.5C 185.00 16.00 160.00 27.00 1 270. 00 ! 20. 0C 200.00 36 6" MJ Hydrant Assembly 1.00 EA. 1,175.00 1 175.00 990.00 990.00 1 180.0 1,180.00 1.500.00 1, 500.00 1, 300.00 1, 300. 00 1, 100. OC 1,100.00 37 6" MJ Gate Valve and Box 1.00 EA. 400.00 400.00 365.00 365.00 475.00 475.00 300.00 300.00 450.00 450.00' 450.od 450.00 38 8" MJ Gate Valve and Box 1.00 EA. 575.00 575.00. 479.26 479.26 580.00 580.00 400.00 400.00 550.00 550.0011 550.01 550.00 1 1 4 0 LBS 90.0 1.00 1..490.00 2.00 2,980,00- - 1.6 2 458.50 40 Trenching for Res. Water Services 200.00 L.F. 4.00 800.00 10.00 2,000.00 10.00 2,000,00 8.00 1,600.00 10.00 2.000.00, t 12.00 2,400.00_ r Total Bid S43 768.75 4.5 325..00 46 853.00 $49,199.50 57,68".'72 . i . I 1 I TABULATION OF BIDS - Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the officials designated for a bid opening by the City Council of Maplewood was convened at 9 a.m., Friday, March 31, 1989. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and publicly read aloud bids for construction of Walter Street, Project 84-14 Present were: Bruce Irish and James Gessele Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following bids were opened and read: ' BIDDER BID AMOUNT BID BOND Ro-So Contracting F. M. Frattalone Brown and Cris William B. Miller Lake Area Utility Volk Sewer and Water $43,768.75 57a 45,325.00 5% 46,893.00 5% 49,199.50 5% 52,436.54 5% 57,686.32 5% Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the bids received to the city engineer instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at the regular city council meeting of June 8, 1989. RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS .. - BE IT RESOLVED BY THE-CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Ro-So Contracting in the aMount of $431768.75 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Walter Street, Fenton Avenue to Frost Avenue, City Project 84-14, and the mayor and clerk, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. ' AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROMu Public Works Coordinator SUBJECT: Award of Bids--City Vehicles DATEx June 5, 1989 AGENDA ITEM Action by'Councilv Endorsed- Modif ied__~�__�� ReJeoted_�~__~__�~ Date - Following advertisement, bids were received for surplus vehicles on "" May 18, 1989. Twenty-four bids were received. The highest bid for a 1983 Ford Futura was $1402 and for a 1980 Chevrolet Scooter was $1151. Award of bids is recommended. WCC jc G -a Action by Council MEMORANDUM Endorsed'- TO: City Manager Modified FROM Director of Community Development Re j ecterl SUBJECT: Fish Creek Estates Preliminary Plat Date EIATE: June 2, 1989 The City Council considered an amendment to the Critical Area Plan and a preliminary platq code variations and approval of a "relaxed urban" street design for the Fish Creek Estates preliminary plat on April 10. The amendment to the Critical Area Plan was to change the minimum size of the I ots south of Fish Creek from three acres to one acres Council tabled the request until a feasibility study for public water to this area is finished. No study has been initiated yet. Council also tabled the preliminary plat and associated requests for 70 days to determine whether the Legislature would provide +unding for the entire area south of Fish Creek for a park. The Legislature did not provide any funding. A copy of the staff report on the plat is attached. There is no change in the recommendations MEM06 Attachment: March 29th staff report MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat,; Three Code Variations, and Approval f or a Re I ax ed Urb an St reet Des i g n LOCATION: South of Fish Creek west of Henry Lane APPLICANT: Lawrence D. Anderson PROJE r CT TITLE: Fish Creek Estates Preliminary Plat DATE I : March 29, 1989 INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting approval of the +ol I owing: I a A prel iminary p at for seven 1 of 2s The use ot gutter) Section 29-52 (a) (4) of the Streets I Sidewalks and Publ ic Grounds code permits Council to authorize a "relaxed urban" street design. (In a separate report, staff is proposing that Council amend this code to define the characteristics of a "rural" street designs The applicant's proposal is consistent with the proposed ordinance.) 3. Approve a variation from the platting code to permit on-site sewage disposalv rather than sanitary sewers Section 30-12 requires sanitary sewer to be installed in the right-o+-ways of newly dedicated and constructed streets. 4. Approve a lot - frontage variation from the platting code and a lot-width variance from the zoning code- for Ldt Sevene Section 30-8 (+)(1) of the platting code requires single dwelling lots to have atleast sixty feet of frontage on a public street. Proposed Lot Seven woul d have 31 feet of street frontage and 32 feet width at the setback I ine. As such a I ot-f rontage variation of 29 feet and a lot-width variance of 43 + . eet are required* DISCUSSION The City cannot approve this plat. Section 1166-12, subdivision 3 of State Statutes states that the City shall permit development only in accordance with the Critical Area Plans The Critical Area Plan requires minimum lot sizes of three acres. An amendment to allow one acre lots was not approved by the State Environmental Quality Board (EQB). All amendments to the Critical Area Plan must be approved by this board before the City can approve an amendments I State I aw al so requires that a City take act ion on a prel iminary plat application within 120 days of the application, unless the app icant approves a time extension. The applicant had approved an extension to allow the EQB to review the Critical Area Plan Amendment, If the applicant does not allow the City an additional extensiong the City must take action on this application. RECOMMENDATION Deny the application for preliminary plat, Code Variations, Code Variance and "Relaxed Urban" street, unless the applicant allows the City an additional time extension. Denial is based on the 'fact that the proposed lots are not consistent with the City's Critical Area Plan. State law prohibits approval of developments that are inconsistent with the Critical Area Plan. GO MEMO Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Area Development Concept 4. Preliminary Plat 5. Letter: 'Ramsey County 6. Memo: Soil Conservation 0% • • ,R} z R � R HIGHwoo AVE MAMIE AVE vi 9C rl R ! R 9 F W Cr R . a R G Cr F o F F 2 t o CARVER AVE R F RITZ hQ N AREA x F F or W I/ /LL 4GE OF .VEr ci ij Applicant' Site E LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 N • . 8'fatr. y 't 31reo C H (s fza) <11) - ' as v A. � 1 � Z ,•tLsp DIdj.OS1 1 Bar 9„ , ipp 116' I04t3 M �• 10• a / - ' sw.►I+I�r . •1 /7_f G .AAo.. .48w.- 1.400" ~ a /3) e • O � ,• -'+ • ? a• 1 O Z 0s) a Q 11 (3-0) = im. a _- ' - -- - N ' J cgs- 4 VE ( 1 w ( � 1 ..�. h . FI . 1 I20 , •w % a 1 f 1 Sul j .ti Pi pa oe. %I am" 1 .� I2. •K 7 y p Lt 1 Oo : 05) 7 � 8 1 ) •flo or melLwA. 11A. 10 RAMBE Y 7�. ILI • CovNTY 12 / _ • �; / v F GoO� It� / IF 090 x7 �4 •fit t .- 31 - M 14.,{ i•1 14 r •: � ff.97 1 S � P` shorelend boundary' `z Arm- 0 .. 73S• _- - Cr_ a - -- _ 1 -J `o`•�,• - 6�1�.8T 2L3.S7 o RAMSE Y COUNTY 10126N SPACE t b A► 139,ItS'�P .� 3. /9.e too ' (•s) 53 r / P ' of = ' qI �qr IDI 15-0 d' / �, - tee .•. ti .. It v fd 40 13 Y ! •- ii � b;�o �� 153,550 �s E r CRITICAL A R A i o r 3.5.54-4, 1 �� i i, * - 40 - 4p T1! 64d1 i rA o Ld,0t21�Z -nn.• IM I � ,4r �-+ - -- �/ � � ba.►° 4;Qt?� X04 � t /I � �• i e, - - - V pr 9• frla�•• J IZ 9. l •''� o i (3) 53 / *•s `� _` ao. aa" -- - 1• 4.50-356' "°7 rr ~.mac ` t I ° & . .� _- - - - 1 ice• G .�.� �St'2 Z �.. • s PROPERTY LINE" / ZONING MAP Q Attachment 2 �• 4 I w,t w 1.Y.. w1i ` • �• r L..w---- :--- -y �.����A�� �1✓.jr.��� _ - --'f �• .1i�r� R -ItJi� Kf�_.� �•\% ri J•i2+.i� 1 _ . �. �i� /• • �11!" 11.'` 1•.L! M t7 r” �. . .•• ' ___.rte- ►• •• ', ` i !�+ • ' •1 ' it ~'. \./lam . • ti f♦ , f• J oi•' • : = t �' �t •, w ♦`y .�� \••,• ' s.• • ,� •r� ,�� ;. top ,- (r e;,o 1 l lip,' .i;tt _:�.� • ;C� 1 , w..^ '� I .. ,, f i► I 40 No %� � ' ``,�•�'J ` - ! f " , � . i 4f� Y � i �11� � � •�� •• Yf'� , 7. � -►i111 + .. ; I � i. `I. _ . 1 v.i'r ; ,• 1. ; .. �H EL 3 H T oo .a.•• I, SOL dill r/,��OAn �♦' .•i+t t� �\ ` - is t) � 1,, Ramsey Count open space ;��� .�''�� Possible f { lie (.-- • ,1j i • �" �• r Protected steep slope = `,' ► : °" -- (40 foot. se_tbac k requ i red)` 1 .4 w �t .ur e Street !, 'n� ,� ,...; ►`�, ' CD \ - Lam. • _; !J•! 1 .ts '� i:i i.- -.�.Jl -�-e �.. '. •r; •• _ r 1 1 // '�- • ,. w; 0 ,1. 13 '/ • A J • ' 976 . p 1 • _ r t� J /, , ' •1� i 4 _ `'� �' `'� � ', ` '' (� _ , s �, a \ � y Lam, r r • ; i 1 �_ � , . 3. 55A 139i� i ill a , J e0, • 90° �;1�..� iii . ,� ` �' ! . e•s,n l ! 'V•: /'t ,� ern a474 'r ; •, 1• '' ,\��:' �-- -'�• � +" 1• � , / , 1 � r li •rte: - 1.1�, .,�.,� r• � \ � ` , � `,\ ;� � .Ii 1/ : : � , / ,, � !►.111, . .1 �Q ok 9 1 ` !» 0� \ ` ,list t • / i \ . �^ 110 �� "^•� ,•� t !. � � �♦ •_a. • �, .t ! �• •1. --_•` " • " s-_ :° {,� „ar,'t � :. t .� _r � r Applicants Site ° ' _ / 4 816 'i�)�i /'1 1 � / ice- � ` f 11 ��. �"'+� '••' ^ •• Ramsey - y ounty open space •' • \- i••� • r Oil . • Notes: 1 ! f•'' '��° �, 1--- . Gross area: 47.6 �`\ '�`�• - Net area: 45.0 .�� s� °; %; / i �`•� t . _. Average lot area: 2.0 acres Mo �/!-e� °•% t "5•'�l�� •1 Distance to farthest cul —de —sac: , •'' ./ �� /s 4,100 feet (If Heights Avenue is ' extended to Henry Lane pow feet.) •�- _ << �,� AREA DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT Source: Plbnning Department ` 5 • Attachment 3 ' e N 1, 11 1' i 1''.� `\ ,' � I J1� 1 t1 1,/rlrtttr �;• r , i � 1� 1�� ,1 1 � � , 1 1 t l l� �►+/ 1 t, i t r f f , ' t 1 t / /� ' 1 t� l?, r 1► t t l f , � /' �1y11l� 11111 � `� i •rtt ►1�,'�r11�±1 f I t x 1 1 1/ �. - -- 1 1 ! 11 ` 1 1+ t � ��� I % 1 t 1 1 �► r I' t ►� fl 1 1 1 i/ l/ J• /, t ��i i111I111 , 1� 1 1 / , ►'I,11'�1 / 1 t / 1 r ! t11: 111 !i It+ 1 � � 1 ''� f! I tl / 1 1 � f � r •. i 1 t� i 11! It t 1 /• / t i t � „l i ! , � 1 1 I 1 t 1 j l� / .�.� 1 1 �. I i i l 11 1111 !!' ,.., � 1 1 ''.cl , I' •1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1, 1� I ,'� / oe / �j ds. R %* / I J� lilt ,1111 t 1 1 1 4 f wuart •wo — Ao I r+ l l t l 11 1 r 1 oov //' /' 1/ /t� ! t 1 j t of L C T i.o roo // „ \ \ \ /. , / t t I f 1 t 1 I , 1 ` ` '' • r . , > \ \ \ ` 1 ` 1 , t t ; / op or f of , .' / �R , 'y'�/�. ( ' ,, s, \ ` . \ �� �\ ` fir \ ' \, t 1``11 `� ; i ,' \, ` 11 ti) \\�`;•`; �\ �., / !f'L'Q,'/ MIS / 400 �/ '� � 1 \, �� ♦ � �'� /do It. i 1 1, , / / 1 1 ` •...._ �� .`'•\� �► tea.. �.. i 'wo 00, / // / , �• _ '/ 1 �� ._3►i �� //� , /1 , ' \` \`. � .•tea _ �- ..�_.� i If / i/ .44o • � / / IF 1 ( � . �• ' t � / _ III • , r / ' / t / / / ��` \``��� —�— .. '� // —�� \ `\ •_ ” ' �+ \�" , `�\ wow �/' `��` \ / ' // / / /// / �oo op Jo :;•. • ,OF . o. • / , /I -' •-ate `` ___ -� . ,1\ `,.. , \ \ 1 / , - , I it . / / /�..�`�\ \ ♦\ �1( \\ \ • \ t lb ow ow dpop oo loo, op :.; t 1 t /!1' 11 • � f , �\ � . \ \ \� \ \ \\� \ \• \1 11 1 f r 'r:;:,: Sam Tel a 1:;:::►:• _ \ • LOT 41 V, Nb •• • \ \ Na moub . DAO IN lk CL . *..� \ t RAMSEY COUNTY OPEN SPACE PRELIMINARY PLAT :�':::•::: Off Site Easements That Must be Acquired. ...::::.... ;.;.:...::•:..... Attachment 4 4 ,b FW j wMSEY couTW RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS& RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2015 N. Van Dyke Street Telephone (612) 771 -1707 !Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 -3796 regory A. Mack, Director April 11, 1988 Mr. Randall Johnson AICP - Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Mapl ewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Anderson Development Proposal Dear Mr. Johnson: Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed development south of Fish Creek. In general, we would certainly support the city's effort to purchase the property for open space. As we have indicated in earlier conversations regarding this matter, the remaining county open space funds are committed to acquire remaining parcels i.n our approved sites, If the development were to proceed, we would have the following concerns regarding the specific variances that have been proposed. 1) on site sewage disposal system - One acre lots seem rather small for on -site systems. Therefore, we would request the city to look very carefully at this to insure that there is no impact on the adjacent- open space property. 2) Streets without curb and gutter - Due to the seep topography on the open space site surrounding the site, it would be desirable to direct as much of the run -off toward the storm -water ponding area east of the site adjacent to the freeway. It would seem difficult to accomplish this without street curb and gutter and storm sewer system. If the storm -water is not contained we would have very strong concerns about erosion on adjacent open space steep slopes. 7 Attachment .5 Mr. Randall Johnson April 11, 1988 Page 2 3) long cul -de -sac - The length of the cul -de -sac does not directly affect the open space. However, if the develop- ment were constructed as proposed, we would request the city to provide a publ i c right -of -way along the east side of development to access the open space south of the development site. This portion of the open space has some recreational potential, and should be accessible to residents of the area. Concerning the other question in your letter, we have no concerns regarding the east -west street between Henry Place and Dorland Road. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please keep me informed regarding this development. Sincerely, lti Gregory A . Ma k " Director 0 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 4ai w 1 w STATE OF MINNESOTA RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT S- May 26., 1988 Randall Johnson, Maplewood Associate Planner Tom „Petersen, Conservation District Manager Soil Assessment for Anderson Development Proposal I Introduction The. following report is a brief summary of inherent soils suitability for on site septic systems at the proposed Anderson site. The interpretations are based on data contained in the Ramsey County Soil Survey. When selecting a specific location for an on site septic system, it is recommended that a qualified Soils and Septic System Specialist be consulted to insure adequate -des f gn. II. Soils The following soils mapping units may. be found on site 155E (Chetek Sandy Loam 0 TO 6% slope) and 454 B, C, D, F (Mahatomedi Loamy Sand 0 TO 40% Slopes). All 5 soil mapping units have limitations for on site septic systems. Limitations range from moderate to severe depending upon slope. All of the soils units have underlying. material that is a mixture of sand and gravel. Sand and gravel will have rapid permeability and thus present an extreme potential for the contamina-- tion'of ground water and /or adjacent surface water resources. III. Recommendations Due to the potential limitations as cited by the Soil Survey and the proximity of Fish Creek, I recommend that the City require a detailed environmental assessment before allowing systems to be established. Please note that there is existing evidence of septic system seepage into Fish Creek. (This problem was most likely caused by two dwellings that have been removed from the Ebertz property.) AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Attachment Planning. Commission -3- Minutes 4~3-89 CommissionIr Ayers moved the Planning Commission . ' recommend wide corner I t at the northeast corner of Rip I ey AvenUe and Atlantic the. + d at: 1. A de corner 1 woL0d not ` adversely the general pl n or the spirit and intent of th ordinance, all required setbacks ' would be met provide p r sight-lines at the intersection. 2.' The proposed' l'ot woul d Xce in character with four other substand lots in the neighborhood, all of which have��es�� width than that proposed. ' 3. Code permits substandard-width corner lot Vds e \bea ly of record, without the need fa Before the new oved, the applicant shall: 1. Reloca the existing deta garage to the east of- the e��sting dwelling. 2^ de a certificate of s verifying that the ing dwelling will meet the ed five-foot imum sidey�rd setback from lot line. Com~��sioner Fischer seconded Ayes -Axdahl, Ayers, Barre , Cardinal , Dempse Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Sigmund ik, Sletten B. Critical Area Plan Amendment: South of Fish Creek, West of 1-494 ' Secretary Olson presented the staff report. A commissioner. asked Ken Haider, Director of Public Works, to give an update on when the sewer plan for the City would be completed and if it would be possibleto bring sewer into this areea. Mr. Haider said corrections are being made at this time and the sewer plan should be completed in the near future Mr Haider` .also said it comp n ' . . . -' would be very 'difficult to bring sewer into this area. commissioner Fischer moved the City Council take no action on the plan amendment until a feasibilitystudy for the extension of water to this area is finished. ` ' Planning Commission -4- Minutes 4-3-89 Commissioner Dempsey seconded ` Ayes--Axdahl , Ayers, ' Barrett, Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiolav Fischer, Larsonv Sigmundik, Sletten C. Preliminary Plat: Fish Creek Estates Thee staf f neport was presented and discussed with the ' commissioners. The applicant was not present at the meeting. .. Commissioner Ayers moved the Planning Commission recommend denial of' the application for preliminary plat, code variations, code variance and "relaxed urban" street, unless the applicant allows the City an additional time extension. Denial is based on the fact that the proposed lots are not consistent with the City's Critical Area Plan. State law prohibits approval of developments that are inconsistent with the Critical Area Plan. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes--A.-.. , Ayers, ' Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten D. Code dment: RE District ` ��� �� The staff r=�prt was presented �m/d discussed Commissioner F cher moved a. roval of the ordinance pertaining to a essory use in the RE, residential estate, district Commissioner Slett S onded Ayes--Axdahl , Avers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fipla, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten VIII. UNFINISHE ESS A. ' Sout s Apartments 1. vision' of the Condi ional Use Permit north of the site 2. "Conditional Use Permit r this project 3. Preliminary Plat `� AGENDA REPORT Action by Council.I To: City Manager Michael McGuire From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Col l i nsAC� Endorsed Subject: Revocation of Motorized Recreational Vehicle Permit ModifiecT*....- - Date: May 16, 1989 Rejected .._..._....,.,.. Date T ni- rndi trt i nn On March 21, 1989, a .motorized' recreational vehicle permit was issued to Lucille M. Hause, 2090 E. Co. Rd. D. The permit allows the operation of two to three two— or four —wheel recreational vehicles. Background Since this permit was issued in March, we have received no fewer than ten complaints to this location. Complaints have been for excessive dust, violation of motorized recreational vehicle permit, noise, excessive number of vehicles, etc. In most instances, by the time the squads were able to get to this location, the activities had ceased. During the recent rains, this area has become extremely muddy and has been opened up for another activity, which in my estimation is a violation of the recreational vehicle permit. This recent activity has been four—wheel—drive pickups driving and racing through the mudded areas. Again, by the time the squads arrive at this location, most of this activity has ceased. However, on several occasions, four— wheel —drive pickups were observed by officers stuck in the mud at this location, In most instances in calls to this location, we are finding that the people who are in operation there are not residents at 2090 E. Co. Rd. D. On April 19, 1989, two users were from Mahtomed i , Minnesota, one was from White Bear Lake, and two others were from varying areas in Maplewood. Recommendation The motorized recreational vehicle course in this neighborhood is not condu- cive to a residential area. It has not only created a great strain on the neighbors, but it also requires a great deal of police monitoring and time spent for what should be a low—priority call, I am recommending that, based on the past history and based on the numerous number of complaints that we have received and continue to receive, this motorized recreational vehicle permit be revoked and that no further permits be issued to this area. Action Required City Manager issue letter of revocation to the Hause family and refer the matter to the City Council for their concurrence. KVC:js Agenda Number Action by Council.: AGENDA REPORT Endorse Mo dif i ed..-..-. -- Re3ectea TO: City Manager Date FROM: Finance Director RE: 1990 -1994 CAPITAL'IMPROVEMENT PLAN DATE: June 6, 1989 The five -year Capital Improvement Plan is a planning tool for City staff and elected officials. It contains major capital outlay and improvement projects for the period of 1990 -1994. Projects included for 1990 are planned to be included in the 1990 Capital Budget for the City. The new CIP is designed to replace the 1989 -1993 CIP within the Comprehensive Plan. Since the CIP is part of the Comprehensive Plan, it requires four votes for adoption. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the five -year Capital- Improvement Plan at its June 5th meeting. DFF: kaz 14 ... / MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: capital Improvement Program DATE May 31, 1989 p The 199 update of the Capital Improvement Plan is enc l used . It y covers the ears 1990- -1994. Staff intends to update it each year. The p e Ca ital Improvement Plan is part of the 'city `s Comprehensive chap a therefore, must he treated as a plan amendment" Plan anti any 9 , RECOMMENDAT ICN Approve the enclosed capital improvement program • MEM07 Attachment: C I P (Separate enclosure ) AGENDA ITEM ' AGENDA REPORT Act "Ion by CoonolIv ' TO: City. Manager ' ���o��ed_�~�~�� ' Modif ied_~~_���~ FROMV Assistant City Engineer Rejeoted�_�_~_�~ Date. SUBJECT: Pipeline Setback Variance--Lot 15, Block 2, Hills and Dales (Duluth and Junction) DATE: June 5, 1989 Ta The attached request for a variance from the pipeline setback requirements of Ordinance 9-215 was received. There is a mitigating factor in this circumstance. The topography drains from the pipeline toward a low area on Junction Avenue and away from the proposed house pad. However, there are several adverse factors. A setback of 5`feet is a significant reduction since . the, adverse affects of an incident increase geometrically, rather than proportionally with proximity to the source. The proposed house is on the far end of a dead-end street that may be isolated from direct emergency vehicle access in the event of an incident since the pipeline crossing and low area are toward the ^`intersection. In view of the large number of potential variables such as the type of petroleum product being conveyed by the pipeline at the t'Ame of a potential incident, weather conditions, source of ignition, etc., it is not possible for the engineering department to evaluate the relative safety of the proposed variance compared to the setback stipulated in the ordinance. It is recommended that the applicant obtain the services of a recognized exp*mrt in fire safety engineeringto evaluate and make recommendations concerning this particular situation. BAI jc Attachments AGENDA ITE 11-.3 AGENDA REPORT Action by Counoilia TO: City Manager -------- FROM: Assistant City Engineer Modif ied.~..��� .� Rejeoted_�~�_~�~�~ SUBJECT: Pipeline Setback Variance--Maplewood Meadows Date DATE: June 5, 1989 ' The following drawing with field measured spot elevations was received from the developer of the Maplewood Meadows subdivision to justify a variance from the setback requirements of Ordinance _9-215. The building pads of the lots on the South side of Gall Avenue have an 80-foot setback. This was allowed since there was not enough distance to have the stipulated 100-foot setback and msix~foot high berms were.placed as a mitigating factor. The request is to allow decks extending another ten feet toward the pipeline to be constructed. ' The topography is such that an elevated deck would be protected from direct radiant heat by the berm if the flames of a burning spill staved close to the level of the bottom of the adjacent storm water pond and the berm was not displaced. However, under ,certain weather conditions' the burning spilled project might lift the flames aloft. In this-case the deck and house would be subjected to direct radiant heat. Since the intensity of radiant heat varies geometrically, the heat intensity at 70 feet is significantly greater than at 80 feet or 100 feet. Theoretically, the heat intensity at 70 feet distance form the source would be approximately twice that at 100 feet distance. It is not possible for the engineering department to quantitatively evaluate the relative safety of the proposed variance. It is recommended that the applicant retain the services of a recognized expert in fire safety engineering to evaluate and make recommendations concerning the variance in this particular situation. BAI jc l �� . f- 7• Q :�. '•• ';44 � . Z _� •�s - • Q _ - • n+r R d �s • o ' /� rat fo - 'e Fill, lillilljlllllll 12 (50 Va 13 • 14 10 too 15 11.9 .. 8 ON at ox 'in Ake 'Ilk - ws .17 •. � _ rs � s 1 V � s �� 1 7 O � s s w • � � �� s i p Z /,, - K Est /�%�3 �� t 6.�� �• r tb • t • ' +r G A b (-I, a d � S AVENUE •, ,�, 40 muk F4" 16 •• ♦ • ` + 1 t f •• F-1 I - � � � � � R9 �0 i5 l 2 „3 : .4 s .5 • .6 s 7 s 11 iZ 13 14 ; 41 x __ -rte i 1 f s ' s ,� , • . _ �_ �: � , 1 t /s _ � ✓ w � _ E s s i — I ` � � � • s S s •+ _ * Z O l A ,- Iv ; iX M t — i•r t r D� AI r`. c M, •' t .�. AV rill A,wkp%z%uooe <hs fie+• �•t • �MOC6 0.1 LS•. �� ,..,�,� O _ ! 1 • y�' • oar! . nt • . '01,1141 7;8 _ _ . • f • ?! ' ?! , - r s _ •. fly 2 7.0. r 1 73 y_i 1 j M oe dwl 17 r�i• �� s /, �f� �G.� Jam. $ .•• l��`�� �, • ._ . r.t " -� ke 345Z. fo .0000 907-86 -•1-- 1 • i ip. .,0/ - . — 04 E �toaE�•r T�LSEN1 ;•:� • • S'88'57': ✓J / -1 r'Lt_.. r✓ J M T t •• AP LL WOOD Ali , G N _ Ho //, 4 Action by MEMORAND� --MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager E^~^"r FROM: Director a+ Community Development udifzeo-�.-~� SUBJECT: Pipeline Setback Ordinance DATE: May 26, 1989 IATRODUCTION This is a request to readopt and amend the pipeline setback ordinance;" The City Council adopted the current ordinance in 1987, with a stipulation that it expire on �July 1, 1989. DISCUSSION This ordinance Was original ly adopted after the pipeline disaster in Moundsview" The need has not changed and has been further reinforced by the recent explosion in San Bernardino (Refer t�� the attached article.) ' California. Several changes are proposed: 1" There has been some question as to whether garage. should be subject to the setback. �� code amendment is propose~ to clarify this issue" Since an attached garage is part of the "house it should be subject to the setback. Since a detached ' " . garage is not part of the house d i t -- -- - an s no generally used for human occupancy, it should not be subject to the setback. The attached ordinance is amended accordingly, . 2.`Insection 9-218v approval ofa reduced setback would bemade by the director of community development, rather than the city, with an appeal t the it ' �� e c y council The current di ' -,,__. ~ ~. ^` , en ordinance is not clear as to who ie to approve a reduced setback. '"^ther problem with this section has been in determining —'u nz whether berms and oil containment systems will provide enough ~rote�^ion to allow encroachment into the setback The protection this determination t�� be made e proposed change would require e y an expert approved by the fire marshal. 3" A new section 9-219 has been added to require that grading be done to maximize the distance between any pipeline leakage and the proposed or surrounding buildings, A pipeline leak should not be all owed to flow towards a house. 4. Section 9-220 has been changed to require a certificate* of survey, rather than to rely on field data, in locating a pipeline Requiring a certificate, signed by a registered land surveyor " will provide documentation of the pipeline location in case a« dispute arises in the future. RECOMMENDATION Readopt the attached pipeline setback ordinance, as amended, MEM05 Attachments: 1. San Bernardino article 2. Pipeline setback- ordinance M)riAeAYA&1415_W Try � � �''�. a 1 ��' +� '" `. ` ��'`j � � �L � � � r{ �� � . ' �l1 � � - _ _ t 1 t � � v � �r�r �! � � x;11. 1 ■•!- � � .�� 1f�. From News Services vide food, clothing and lodging. repaired tracks. "The train went by, ,f f M)riAeAYA&1415_W Try � � �''�. a 1 ��' +� '" `. ` ��'`j � � �L � � � r{ �� � . ' �l1 � � - _ _ t 1 t � � v � �r�r �! � � x;11. 1 ■•!- � � .�� 1f�. From News Services vide food, clothing and lodging. repaired tracks. "The train went by, which two crewmen and two boys in fuel. c+ and then I heard this loud bang. I just a house were killed. There was a San Bernardino, Calif. The gasoline leak and fireball erupted started running," said Leah Thomas, "very good possibility" the 14 -inch Killed yesterday were a woman, a Three people were killed Thursday about 8 a.m. in what used to be the 10, who was waiting for her school pipeline was damaged by the train toddler and another adult whose sex morning when a fireball from a rup- back yard of a house --- one of the bus. "INiy backpack fell off, and I got accident, said Ken Seal, manager of could not immediately be deter - tured gasoline line engulfed homes houses destroyed when the runaway burned on my arm by the heat. I was the Las Vegas office of the Calnev mined, a deputy coroner said. The and outraced fleeing children in the train jumped the tracks on a curve on screaming. There was smoke and Pipeline Co., a subsidiary of the Un- woman's body was found in the back neighborhood where a runaway train May 12. Seven homes had been lev- flames.'' ion Pacific Corp. yard of a house; the other adult and killed four people and demolished a eled and the area fenced before the the child were found in a room to- row of houses two weeks ago. fire. A passing freight train may have ig- One locomotive came to rest over gether. nited the spewing gasoline, said the line, which is six feet under- At least 31 people were injured, six "It looks like a bomb went off over Southern Pacific spokesman Bob ground, but it didn't appear to have As they surveyed the burning skeie- critically. Ten homes and 18 cars Duffy Street," City Attorney James Taggart. Residents have complained dug deeply enough into the ground to tons of their houses, residents vowed i were destroyed, and five homes were Penman said at the scene. that train wheels throw oft' sparks as have touched the pipe, said Ted Lo- to leave their neighborhood and ex- damaged in the blaze, which radiated they round a curve and say trainmen patkiewicz of the National Transpor- pressed anger that authorities had so much heat that pets and gar3en "It's like a nightmare," said Delores walk alongside afterward and douse: tation Safety Board (NTSB). NTSB not foreseen the disaster. crops were singed two blocks away. Jones, whose house was destroyed by small fires. investigators who examined the train the fire. "I haven't slept since the wreck were returning yesterday. ' "We're all nervous wrecks," Allene _ At least .70 homes with 200 people train wreck. It's come back to haunt The fire was extinguished at 4:09 Ntuhammad said as she cuddled her ' were evacuated, and the residents me." p.m., eight hours after the explosion. The pipeline carries gasoline, diesel terrified 2- year -old daughter, Fatin. will have to wait until at least this and jet fuel from a tank farm in "After the train wreck, they told us it evening before being allowed back Witnesses said the firestorm surged Residents said they were unaware of Colton, several miles from here, to was safe. They were wrong. How can into their homes, officials said. The through the neighborhood moments the pipeline running beneath their southern Nevada. It supplies the Las we live here anymore? How can our pipeline company said it would pro- after a freight train roared past on the properties until the train wreck, in Vegas Valley with 90 percent of its children deal with this ? ". -To t-t c+ k. n fD c+ ORDINANCE NON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PIPELINE SETBACK ORDINANCE, The Map I ewood C i t Counc i 1. hereby orda i n as. f o I ows (add i t i an s Underl i ned and del et ions are crossed out) : Section 1. The Pipeline Setback Ordinance is amended and adopted as f of I ows: ARTICLE XIn PIPELINE SETBACK Sec. 9-215. Purpose W .It is the purpose of this article. to protect the public from the hazards of a pipet ine I eak by requiring that new buildings designed for human use or occupancy and their attachments must meet a minimum required setback. (Ord. No. 6069 § 19 B-10-87) Sec. 9-216 a Appl icabi I ity'. This article shall apply to any new subdivision, building or addition proposed to be I ocated 'within one hundred (100) f eet of a pipet ine, (Ord, No. 6069 § 11 8-10-87) Sec. 9-217. Definitions, As used in this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: Pipel ine: (1) Pipe with a nominal diameter of six (6) inches or more, located in the state, that is used to transport hazardous liquids, but does not include pipe used to transport a hazardous liquid by gravity, and pipe used to transport or store a hazardous liquid within a refinery, storage, or manufacturing facility, or (2) Pipe operated at a pressure of more than two hundred seventy -five (275) pounds per square inch that carries gas. BLtilding: Any structure designed primarily for human use or occupancy, including, but not limited to,, businesses, offices, residences and institutions. Decks, overhangs, parches, attached-garages, or any similar attached structures shall be considered part of the building,, Detached garages shall not be considered part of the buildi Attachment 2 Sec. 9-218~ Building setback. All buildings subject to the provisions of this article and all newly created lots shalI be designed to accommodate a setback of at least one hundred (100) feet from a pipeline. This setback may be reduced , where_: (1) A statement is provided from an expert approved bZ---the addition will be as safe as.i+ constructed at the . . (2) A one-hundred—foot setback would be impractical or unnecessary because of existing geography, streets,, lots lines or easements; and (3) There will be guaranteed construction of an oil containment system or other mitigating facility where the City Engineer finds that a leak would accumulate within the setback area. The design must be approved by the City Engineer. The Director's decision may be appealed to the City.... ouncil . Sec. 9-219. Reguired- The site shall be_____!3raded to maximize the distance between Sec. 9-2+9-. Pipeline location. At the time of application for a building permit, site plan review or preliminary plat, the applicant shall provide a certificate of survey, si-gned registered land survevor" sesfed-s+Lc-pfam that shows the location of any pipeline within one hundred (100) feet of . . ' mek'Y-r,evq 1mt ered-famd- cert -i+�cat e-. The elevation of the pipeline shall be shown on +m the site plan and on a grading plan, when such plan is required to be submitted. *erd� . �-���-6�6�' Sec, 9-22e-0 Lot of record. A proposed building on an undeveloped lot of record that cannot be constructed because of this article, shall be allowed to be constructed if the building is located so as to comply with this article as closely as possible. The City may require an oil containment system, to be approved by the City Engineer. An 2 emh +st+ +a+ -area- i-mm eXd-emPteC+-far -th +ft -art +e*e-8 Section 2. This ordinance shal I take effect upon its passage and PUbl ication . Passed by the Maplewood City Council on Attest: City Cl erk Ayes-- Nays-- 1 19890 Mayor AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council :, Endorse,„ TO: City Manager Mod fied........,_ Rejected FROM: City Engineer Date SUBJECT: South l awn Drive Traf f i c DATE: June 5, 1 989 Attached is a letter from residents along S©uth 1 awn Drive, south of. Beam Avenue, listing a number of traffic concerns. It is apparent from the letter that the generator of the traffic is the Maple Knoll Townhomes . When that project . was approved, the developer was required to make a connection from the townhomes' private road to Southl awn Drive. This requirement was based on providing adequate access to the project for public safety veh_icl es and traffic. It was fel t that a singl a driveway to Radatz and a one - directional driveway at White Bear Avenue was not ,adequate for the project, South l awn Drive was built to serve adjacent property, as well as the . Maple Knoll Townhomes . There is concern about speed, litter,' i tter , noise, and property damage. These issues can only be addressed through enforcement of current laws and ordinances. The public safety director has addressed this aspect in an attached memo, KGH jw Attachments D C�C�C�OML i MAY 16 198,9 5/E3/8c,? Carl Beohmer L 2_764 Soy: thl air n Dr. Maplewood,, MN. 55109 7877-4819 City Council 1380. E. Co. Rd. B Maplewood, MN. 55109 Attn: Mike MIC-GUire Dear Counc-il Chairman and members, a -n writing this letter hoping to get some kind of action, -which.would effectively eliminate or drastically reduce, the traffic on Southl awn Dr. Whic-h adjoins the service road to the Maple Knoll Apts. SAFETY -traffic regularly e-e-,%ceeds reasonable speed limits, This traffic " .r and is often of a care less nat-L-tre. Residents who live on Southlawn Dr.., children, and other pedestrians, are in constant danqerw f fectively "blind" The CUrVeSf on this service road are e-1 -h many of these vehicles at t h seed eed whic .les 0 travel, and loss of control of the vehicles often occul-s in the South lawn Dr. cu 1--de- -sacs Fich is often 'full of sand washed down from the service r o za d a PROPERTY DAMPCE. etce Traffic. on this sera vice road and Southlawn Dr. has -private and public propert"s resulted in dafniage to both y Litter is a constant probl . em. I personally pict... many bags of tt-jis litter on a weekly basis, and dispose of it through my own private rubbish service, This litterq of course, is unsslghtly,, and .of ten consists of many empty alcoholic beverage con tain-ersa INCONVENIENCE Traffic is heavy on Si-outhlawn Dre to the service road going to and from the Maple Knoll*Apts. at all hours of the ., day, into the late evening,, and A.M. The noise level is very bothersome to residents on Southl awn Dr. It seems the ex..ha1u=;L_ 4- sstems on many typic al "late hour" vehicles using this rOUte y is in need of service per = ,on have seen motorist u= sing this route driving off of the roadway and onto public property; and have % personally experienced property, damage at my own residence. which involved the actual destruction of a privacy fence, well onto property away from the roadways I would appreciate an opportunity to ex. n press my concet - dealing with the matter above,, and I am sure that all residents living on %Southlawn Dr. would lik-e to have this matter discussed as an official matter on the councils .calendar. Thank you very much Carl G. Boehmer We the undersigned, as residents living on Southlawn Dr., do concur with the expressions of concern as stated in the; letter above. And wish it be known that we also would like some action taken which would improve on the e,,•,,isting conditions as stated in this letter. Name Address. Phone Siena tore ? 0 40 _0 #1 7,7 r7 4,3 j �o�? ..moo 9 � -.�..� p A7 7 7Y -7 0%A � • v.�- �- ,,.�.'� �c..J� L P 41. `'��� cue e �mua,� a�s� .so � �.1� �� c 7 7q a, ;t 3 7 S�cC��QiQe��ac.,� Ll U� is Attachment AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action ley C,0Un0jjL TO: City Manager Endorsed Modifi ed.�...� FROM: City En g i n e e r Rejected... SUBJECT. . White Bear Avenue and B �.tr^� e- -�-Gtr�eet date Light DATE: June 51 1989 In 198; -the city council adopted the attached street lighting policy. A rKegUest for a street. I i ght at White Bear and Burke is consistent-with the policy, therefore, Northern States Power has been requested to instal 'l *the light. V.::GH is Attachment i 1 • 7 WHEREAS, the City-Council of the City of Maplewood deems it desirable and necessary to establish a policy on street lights, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following policy be, and is hereby adopted: Lighting Street Li �. 9 9 Polic Y s for the City of Maplewood . ' A. General F ' 1. This .policy applies to street lights erected within the public t right -of -way for the purpose of lighting public streets. 2. Each pro os.ed site shall *be physically call inspected b the Director of P P Y Y P Y Public Works to determine- the feasibility of light placement and the f need for the lights. .3. All lights installed shall be owned and maintained by the e'l ectri c utility company unless said company cannot furnish said light. 4. The Director of Publ i c' Works may cause existing lights to be removed should they - be deemed hazardous or unnecessary for traffic safety. B. Placement j 1 . Each intersection may be l i t provided that no intersection light i will be placed within 200 feet of another intersection light. 2. No mid -block lights shall be installed within 600 feet of another light on the same street. 39 A street1i ht shall be installed at any location deemed a potential traffic hazard by the Director of Public Works. 4. Arterial and collector streets are a special case and lighting needs are to be evaluated on an individual basis taking into account such factors as traffic.volume, driveways, intersections, turning movements, etc. C. Type 1. Additional lights i n an already lighted area will be of comparable size and type, except that the City may from time to time choose a more efficient type of 1 umi na re. om 3 ma 20 All newly developed areas or large existing unlit areas where under- ., .: ground wiring is present shall b lit with 100 - e t watt high pressure sodium .� in a custom residential fixture. 3. Arterial and collector roads shall be illuminated as directed by the Director of Public Works using appropriate fixtures and luminaries compatible with the particular roadway. D. Cost 1.. The cost of operation- of 'existi ng lighting, or individual additions thereof, shall 'be the responsibility of the City of Maplewood. 2. All construction costs" associated with new developments, over and ,: above those borne by the uti 1 i ty company, shal 1 be the respons i bi 11 ty of the developer. 3.. All operating' costs for a period of five ears following owi n installation .. y g 1 tion 4 of 1 i ghts in new subdivisions shall be paid to the City by the devel o P er. This cost shall be estimated based on the average percentage cost increase for the preceding five years, compounded annually a nd app led to the cost per light at the time said light i s to be installed. Said payment shall be sate sfactori ly. arranged for at the time of execution of the "Developer's Agreement. " 4. In exi sti ng , 1 arge unlit areas the costs, as determined for new areas, shall apply. Said costs shall be assessed against the affected prop- erties within said large tracts. Initiation shall be by petition and i n accordance with M.S.A. 4290 50 All assessed costs and costs borne b y the developer i shall be the estimated costs and no part shall be refundable n the event that actual costs prove .to be less, than the estimated costs. 2 Exampl e: The costs per light i s presently $12.55 and the average annual increase for 1978 through 1983 was 13.7 %. Therefore, $12.55 x 1:1.37 = $14.27 per light per month for the first year, and $14.27 x 1.137 $16.23 per -light per month for the second year,etc. equals a total of $93.78 per month for the five years, or a total of $1125.36*to operate one light for the coming five -year p eri od. A TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATIONS APPL I CANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Associate Planner--Tom Ekstrand CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL 2095 E. Larpenteur Avenue Ronald DesLauries The Del ory Company June 2 , 1989 SUMMARY Action by Coun ail : Endorsed........ Vfodified.....,_... Rejected. Dat Renewal of a conditional use permit (CUP) to continue the Del ory Company, a basement waterproofing and sewer and water instal I ation business. (Refer to the applicant's letter of request on page 7.) BAEX[3ROUP4D This business has been in operation since 1971. On April 15, 1982, the City Council granted a CUP to allow this home occupation for seven years (see page 8), by which time, the applicant intended to have his business relocated to Hugo. Due to zo'ning regulations in Hugo, the applicant is no longer able to relocate theres ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Subsections 36-.442 (e) and (+): (e) All conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval , unless Such review is waived by council decision or ordinance. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five (5) years, for SUbseqUent reviews. The council may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviews. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the c ity from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets the agreed upon conditions and is later disallowed because of the city enacting or amending official controls shall be considered a legal nonconforming use. The council may, upon review, terminate the permit if the approved conditions may have been violated or the use is no longer in effect. I Noncompliance with Current Home Occupation Guidelines. (Refer to guidel ines on _pAge 9.) This business does not meet all of the current requirements for a home occupation. The business is "grandfathered" under previous regulations. The activities that do not comply are as follows: Traffic volumes are greater .than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood, due to the applicant's trucks and four employees, 2a There are four nonresident employees. Code allows one on- site at a time. 3a The employees sometimes park along Beebe Road. Code requires on-site parking. 4w The business use on this property exceeds 20% of the house and garage area. The site - has a separate out-building used as an office and a pole building. DISCUSSION In 1982, the City Council worked with the applicant to enable him to relocate his business within seven years. The applicant made a good-faith attempt to accompl.ish this goal but due to zoning reg L ul.ations in Hugo, cannot move his business to this land. While this business does not meet the current criteria for a home oc I cupat ion, it has also not caused any. problems. In the 18 years it has been in operation, there have not been any complaints from neighbors. By being I ocated on top of the hil I the business is secluded and screened from the public's view. In addition, Larpenteur Avenue is not a quite residential streetu Due to its noncon+ormities with Code, staff feels that this business should eventually be terminated. Based on the non- nuisance nature of this business, however, the applicant should be granted one final renewal , by which time the business must cease at this location. The applicant has requested five years. Staff +eels that as development is increasing around this site, the use should be terminated in three years with annual reviews to determine the applicant's progress. RECOMMENDATION Approve the renewal of the conditional use permit to operate a basement waterproofing and sewer and water installation business at 2095 East Larpenteur Avenue for a period of five years. Approval is recommended on the basis that: 2 The City has not received any complaints -from neighbors in the 1.8 years the business has been in operation. 20. The business it not easily visible from Larpenteur Avenue. 3w The applicant is continuing, in good faith , to find an alternative site for .his operations, Approval is subject to the +ollowing conditions: 1 The ' hours of operation shall be 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 2a The maximum number of employees that may be permitted, other than family members, is + our . 3. There shall be no retail sales on site. 4a The business shat I not be enlarged. 50 Bus i ness-rel ated park i ng shat I be proh i b i ted on Larpent eur Avenue. 6w The business shall terminate in three years. Annual Council reviews shall be required to monitor the applicant's progress, 3 BACKGROUND Site Descrintion 14 Lot Size: 1.03 acres 2n Existing land use: Single dwelling, a metal storage building, a wooden seed .,.garage and a small one'-story structure used as an office by the applicanto Surrounding. Land Uses Northerly: Southwinds, of Maplewood rental t own homen Southerly: Larpenteur Avenue. South of Larpenteur Avenue are sincil e dwel I ings, in the City of St Paul Easterly: A single dwelling and a Maplewood water pump station Westerly: Mounds Park Academy parking lot DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Pl annin2. 1.. Land Use PI an Designation: Because of the site's smal I size, the M, Municipal Facility designation for the pump station covers the site. 2. Zoning: R-1 Pub I is Safet V No on-street parking should be allowed on Larpenteur Avenue by employees or customers. mb Enclosures: le Land Use Plan Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Applicants letter dated April 21, 1989 4. Council -Is April 15, 1982 approval 5. Home occupation guidelines 4 '. .......... s .�... .-•1 rr ' -• — = a `w 1 o��'� -- /mists 111tJ1111 11!1 Cz awl ..... . .. .. .. i URI / //111/1■ � �1l11l1� f cc RM �. M arterial -� Penteur LSC os � u O Hillside LAND USE PLAN 5 Attachment 1 • V os m /t Q- N 04 _�i 0 dr� ri V4 FIL So "-T W.R. www Kff ff K Irl r A 1� 0) V 3 so LR wINDs OF 4U 0 r 46 Hillside School U' 4Q Q7 G Ae 9.4( Z--- Pr) /38, rn Offi c —VI '010 020 i QD 0E I ~i' ��, ��� I Is 319.87 rt 2025 2 0 2 7 Larpenteur Avenue Nows ti— tf M�kHLLVV UU -A; 1 . , ry f 21 ` {^ kn 2ND ADD* �-J�� 5 1735 1737 00 1731 1733 9 18 z 1725 1729 +- 1721 1723 I' I 1715 1717 E -sl T `� 1711 '1713 -73 U) 1707 1705, 1 (1701 703 90 Pole Bldge 4v Cy Pump House ?P o� _. Z 15 (MAI n;9 a 17689 I S t:3. 5-4 2095 2135 N. 85* 54° 2-681-7 -7 RES. PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 ri APRIL 21, 1989 THOMAS EKSTRAND, ASSOCIATE PLANNER OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF MAPLEWOOD - 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MN, 55109 RE; HOME OCCUPATION RENEWAL DEAR MR. EKSTRAND ; WE ARE ASKING YOU TO EXTEND THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT TO OPERATE A WATER- PROOFING BUSINESS AT 2095 E. LARPENTEUR AVE. FOR AN ADDITIONAL FIVE YEARS, PLEASE LET ME EXPLAINE WHY. THREE YEARS AGO I PURCHASED A FARM IN HUGO, MN., WITH-THE INTENTION OF MOVING THE BUSINESS OUT THERE, BEFORE WE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY WE ASKED THE CITY ENGINEER IF WE COULD MOVE OUR BUSINESS TO THAT LOCATION, AS IT WOULD TAKE UP ABOUT 1/4 OF AN ACRE, AND WE HAD PURCHASED 35 ACRES, THE CITY ENGINEER GAVE US THE O.K.. WE THEN MORTGAGED OUR PROPERTY AT 2095 E. LARPENTEUR AVE FOR THE DOWN PAYMENT ON THE HUGO PROPERTY. THE PURCHASE TOOK APPROXIMATELY 3 TO 4 MONTHS FOR TITLE CHECKING AND ACTUAL CLOSING ON THE PROPERTY. DURING THAT TIME THE CITY ENGINEER WAS REPLACED BY'-A NEWXITY ENGINEER. HE INFORMED US THAT WE COULD NOT MOVE OUR BUSINESS TO THE FARM. WE NOW HAVE 2095 E. LARPENTEUR AVE. WITH A MORTGAGE THAT WE ARE PAYING OFF, AND THE FARM WE ARE PAYING FOR. THIS WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN $O BAD, BUT MY BUSINESS IS WATERPROOFING BASEMENTS, AND LAST YEAR AS YOU KNOW, WAS VERY DRY, OUR BUSINESS,. AS WITH MANY WATERPROOFING COMPANIES, HAD A TOUGH YEAR - NO RAIN MEANS NO WET BASEMENTS TO DRY UP, WE ARE ASKING THE COUNCIL MEMBERS TO EXTEND OUR STAY AT LEAST FIVE MORE YEARS SO THAT WE CAN GET A HANDLE ON MATTERS FINANCIALLY, WE WILL COMPLY WITH ALL RULES SET DOWN BY THE COUNCIL MEMBERS, AS OF THIS DATE THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HAS HAD NO COMPLAINTS ON US AND WE HAVE ONLY ONE NEIGHBOR R. FITCH, ON BEEBE ROAD, WHO HAS HAD NO COMPLAINT AGAINST US IN THE 17 YEARS THAT WE HAVE BZEN HERE, THANK YOU FOR THE TIME INVOLVED IN REVIEWING THIS MATTER. RESPECTFULLY, RONALD J. DESLAURIES 2095 E. LARPENTEUR AVE. MAPLEWOOD, MN, 55109 7 Attachment 3 2. Special Exception: 2095 E. Larpenteur Avenue a. Manager Evans presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the special exce tion permit to o erate a waterproofing_ business at 2095 East Larpenteur for a jReriod of time not to exceed seven ears, after which time the. business be terminated. Appro.val is recommended on the basis that: 19 The City has not received any complaints about this business from the neighbors. 2. The subject property is not easily visible from Larpenteur Avenue. Approval is subject to the following conditions,: 1. The hours oC operation shall be from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. The maximum number of employees that may be permitted, other than family members, 2. P is four. 3. There shall be no retail sales from the premises. 4. The business shall not be enlarged. 5. Any parking on arkin Larpenteur Avenue, related to this business, shall be prohibited. P 6. After three years, the Council shall review the applicant's operation for com- pliance with the above conditions. 8 Attachment 4 I ' HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE RE[)UlREMENTS 1. No traffic shall be generated by a home oCcupation in ' greater Volumes than would normally be 'expected in a residential neighborhood. The need -for o++~-street parkin( shall not exceed more than three off-street parking spaces -For home occupation at any given time, in addition to the U parking spaces required by the residents. 2, No more than one nonresident employee shall be allowed to work on the premises. Nonresident employees. who work off premises may be allowed to visit the premises. If an on- s. ite employee is parking on site, off-site emPloyees shP-ll not leave their vehicles on site. %f there is no on-site employee vehicle parked on site, one off-site employee ' vehicle may be parked on site. 30 No vehicle associated with the h ome occupation , including Customers or employees, shall be parked on the street or block sidewalks or public easements. Private vehicle5 uSed by the residents shall not be included in this requirement. A. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20> percent of / each level of the house, including the basement and cjara*r, shall be used in the condttct of a home occupation. � 5. There shall be no change visible off premises in the ot`tszde appearance of the building or premises that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one siqn meeting the requirements of the city sign code. 6. No more than 20% of business income shall come from the sale of prod 'cts produced off site unless approved by the city council. 70 No e�uip.ent or process shall be used in such home 'ation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fume�, cz�cup , , odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the l ot . In the case of electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be Used which creates visual ' or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the premises, or Causes fIuctuations in line voltage off the premises. I/ B. There shall be no fire, safety or heelt th hazards-. ' w�� ' A home occuna±ion shall not include the repazr of in�ernn\ combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufEActuring or other objectimnahlp uses ar determined by the city. Machine shops are defined as places t l i f br�caLed where raw me s , using machines that operate a a on more than one hundred twenty (120) Volts of current. Attachment 5 /-/ -- S MEMORANDUM Action by Counoilt TO: City Manager EndorserL---- --- __-_ FROM Director of Community Development Modified.......,,,. SUBJECT: Motor Fuel Station Moratorium lie j ected----- U DATES May 319 1989 Date.... Six months ago, the Council adopted a moratorium on motor -fuel stations that is due to expire on June 15th. A revised ordinance is.being workped.on by the H.oisington Group, Inc., a planning consulting firm. The attached memo from them is a summary of their progress and expected completion dates. These dates seem a little optimistic to me and I would recommend extending the moratorium until August 28th, RECOMMENDATION Extend the motor fuel station moratorium until August 28, 1989a MEM09 Attachment: memo from Hoisington Group, Inc. HO I S I NGTON TEL HO .835 -3160 MaY 30,89 12:56 P.02 Holsington Group Inc. Land use consultants MEMO To: Michael McGuire, City Manager From HUisinbton Group Inc. Subject: Fuel Station Study Progress Report &Schedule Date: 5 -30 -89 Iodate the following tasks have been accomplished: 1 } Reviewed fifes and background information. 2) Researched underground tank types, cathodic protection, leak detection monitoring systems and vapor recovery systems. 3) Reviewed Slate and Federal rules and, from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Health Department, and National and Uniform Fire Codes, 4) Met with Brian EttesvoId of the Minnesota Service Station Association, Steve Amick, iris Kristufek and Joseph Finley of Amoco Oil Company. S) Spoke with Jack Welsh, of Jack Welsh & Associates, fuel station developer, architect and planner; Tom Clark, of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MCPA) and Jim Nye, of Minnesota Health Department, 6} Met with Jim Embertson, Maplewood City Fire Marshall, 7) Reviewed fuel station codes from other municipalities, 8) Observed fuel stations in the City of Maplewood. A schedule of tasks yet to be completed includes the following: • Prepare graft of final report and ordinance .. ., ........................June 12th • Planning ComM' ission Review .............................. ...........................June 19th • City Council Revie w ... ........................................,...... add, .......................,JL.1y 1 001 7300 Metro F3ivd. suite 525 Edina, MN 55435 (612) 835.9960 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: City .Clean—up Day EIATE: June 1, 1989 INTRODUCTION / - q Action by Council: Endorsed- Modified,-- Re J ected....- Date Counc i l memb er Bastian requested information on a City clean-up day's BACKGROUND The City used to have a c ean-up day. It was discontinued about +our years ago because of declining participation. There were originally two disposal sites -East County Line Fire Station and John Glenn - Junior High. East County Line Fire Station was discontinued the last year of the program. Bellaire Sanitation provided the bins, charged the customers and disposed of the refuse at no charge to the City. Participation gradually declined to the point where it was no longer financially feasible to continue the program. This decline had two main causes: rising disposal costs and the opening of the drop -off recycl,ing center at the Public Works Building. The cost for the previous clean-up day was $10 for each car load and $20 for a pick-up truck., Considering that the average home pick-up cost is $10-$12 each month, it was not cost or.time effective to bring ordinary house trash to a clean-up site. ALTERNATIVES Alternatives are based on how to pay for a clean-up day. 1. Charge a fee for each load to compensate +or the cost of trash removal. This was the option that was previously used and discontinued for lack of interest. Disposal costs have risen signi+i cant ly since the previous program was discontinued. The previous fee was $10 for each car load. The fee to drop o++ a car load at the Inver Grove Heights landfill is $28.47. This does not include transportation costs. There is also a lack of demand for recyclable wastes. 2. Do not charge a fee, with the City picking up the cost. St. Paul Planning District #16 had a clean-up day of this type last sat urday. In an area smaller than Maplewood, they incurred a cost of $6,400, not counting the cost of brush chipping, which their park department provided. Their clean-up day was well attended. 3. Take no action, relying on the existing disposal options avail abl e DISCUSSION There does not seem to be enough need to justify the expense and time in, putting together a clean-up day. The most popular pant of the previous clean-up program was the opportunity to dispose Of atyp i cal ref use such as scrap metal app I i ances and yard wastes Homeowners now can dispose of scrap metal appliances and other recyl abl es at the drop- -off site at no cost or through curb-side recyclings Yard wastes can be disposed of at no cost at the compost site and now a hazardous waste day w I I be avai I able at no cost for those types of wastes. The County is planning on providing a brush disposal site in 1990. That only leaves normal household wastes., which can be disposed of through the regularm residential pick-up. If the City decides to have a clean-up day, it should be held next year. It is probably too late to have an event this year, as most people have already cleaned up their properties this spring. Also, we do not have staff time this year, to plan it. Our environmental health officer's time is already filled with work on the compost site, drop-++ center, curbside recycling and hazardous waste day, in addition to his regular inspections. Money would also have to be budgeted. .It should also be noted that a clean-up day would probably not be used by businesses. They usually have large enough dumpsters for their needs. Businesses not keeping their property clean would probably not use a clean-up day either. Normal enforcement procedures should be used in these situations. RECOMMENDATION Take no action. MEM010 Action by Counoiiv Endorsed Modified Rejected- Date Agenda Number A / T0: Mayor and City Council, -1 FROM: City Manager RE: CABLE -- HISTORY OF MAPLEWOOD DATE: June 5, 1989 Councilmember Anderson requested that this be placed on the agenda to discuss putting together a history of Maplewood for Cable TV. MAM : kaz .� � \ Action by CounmiZ:� MEMORANDUM ` Endorserl T[)V City Manager Modified__._�.�_ FROM: Director of Community Development ReJooted___~__~ SUBJECT: Code Amendment - Off-street Parking DATE: June 5, 1989 �-~ INTRODUCTION ' The variance application for 3M brought a problem with the City's parking design requirements to our attention - stall sizes are too large for employee parking and too small for high turnover uses, such as retail stores. DISCUSSION Several changes have been proposed to the parking design standardsvbased on the standards of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The major change is in regard to parking stall sizes». Public parking stall widths have been increased from half nine-foot and half 'en-foot-wide stalls to ten feet for high turnover uses and 9.5 feet for low turnover uses. Employee spaces have been decreased to nine feet or 8"5 feet with a wider aisle. Stall lengths have been reduced from 20 to 18 The current requirement has proven confusing f0'r developers and resulted in insufficient width. The wide/ width is particularly important for high turnover uses, such as retail, where people need to open their car doors wider to get packages in. On the other hand, employee parking is for longer periods of time and a narrower width is acceptable. An 8.5-foot width is al lowed as an option if a wider aisle width is provided to allow for more maneuvering space. RECOMMENDATIOM Approve the attached ordinance, MEMO 12 Attachment: Ordinance ORDINANCE NOS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY'S PARKING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS The heap 1 ewood City Council hereby ordains as f of l ows (additions are underlined and deletions crossed out) Section 1. Section 36-22 (b) is amended to mead as follows: (b) The fol l owin minimum parking-module dimensions shell be re uired 90 degree ark i. n (in feet) Refer to diagram below 8 Di A Use. 8tal 1 width Stall l en th Aisl a width Customer h i h t ur n ove r 10 18 24; Customer law turnover 9.5 18 24 Employee only 940 18 24 8.5 18 2.5w5 60 de ree parking-­(in feet) Refer to d i a rem below 8 Dl A Use Stall width Stall length Aisl a width Customer. h 1 Sh turnover 10 15.6 22 Customer low turnover 9.5 15v6 22 Emn l o ee on l y 900 15.6 22 8.5 1 •_ . 6 2 45 degree.p ark: ing (in feet) - Refer to dia.Siram below Use Customer, high turnover Customer. low turnover g-mp 1_ oyee on S Stall width 10 9.5 940 Bw5 El Stall len2th 12s6 12m6 12m6 12m6 w Aisl e width S E D =18' A D= 18 D 0.1 A 900 Parking 600 and 450 Parking 22m6 22w6 22w6 23.6 Park ing stal I I en the may-- be reduced -by- 2.5 feet for 90 de2ree P"&!l parking and two feet for angle anti where the p ark:: spa%-V.-- pa 9 --- 2 - - abuts a curb, sidewalk or landscaped area. All overhang (o) areas shall be a hard surface or crushed rack, "Customer, hi2-h- turnover" uses shal I include -shopp-in.2- center . r-etail sales_, fast food restaurants, convenience centers and similar uses. "Cus tomes ,-low turnover" uses shall include of+l cep .L industrial schools, churches, .-research multi ple- dwellin2s. motel s,- sit-down restaurants and similar uses. An guest ions on defining these uses shal--l----b-e referred to the Community Tjesi.Sn Review Baard for a decision. Em p-1 oyee ark k 1 with reduced stall widths must be signed for em oyee--- -park in only, see egg-a+ S+esoorn + -a-park* eurb-00000sofd ago" (c) 46)- All parking lots shal I have continuous concrete curbing surrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot and drives. 'Park parking lots, that are not used in the winter, and parking lots having twelve (12) spaces or less are exempt from this requirement, unless required by the city engineer for drainage controlS (d) +e+ All parking lots shall be continually and properly maintained. (e) *++ All parking lots and associated driveways shall have a hard surface of bituminous or concrete. All parking spaces shall be marked with a four- inch -wide "hairpin" stri._p_i_n!3p2ttern, The City mayreguire a ten-+oot-wide -pl -anter or median s every three or four parking bays to p event high-speed movement dia2onally across the parking- lot and to i-mprove esthetics.. (Refer -to diagram below.) Wj UF Landscaped divider 1 0 5- 10' 00 X 0000<_-?c?OG>O Ofm I I I I I I I Id JMIIIIIII����uu • 3 10 Landscaped divider 1 0 5- 10' 00 X 0000<_-?c?OG>O Ofm I I I I I I I Id JMIIIIIII����uu • 3 In shop-ping centers and other larse developments-,--- exterior p.ark ins_.closest to the building shall be oriented with the NMI p.arking- drives.perp- endicular to the building +ace whenever pract i cabl e (h) Park ing- stal I s shat I not be al I owed in +ront of a bui I din entrance. (i) Interlocking or "herein g-bone ll des -iSins shall not be allowed :L-n publ i c p ark ing lots. ( Ref erg to the +ollowing d-iac .jram.) J -i MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO City Manager Endorsed........ FROM: Director of Community Development Modified.... SUBJECT: R-3 District Rej ected........ DATE: May 11 1989 Date The City Council on April 209 requested that part.of the City code be presented for review at each Council meetingg startin - I g with the R3, multiple dwell ingj.district. The R-3 district is attachedg along with a zoning map showing the existing R-3 districts, An inventory of existing and planned R-3 zones is also included le Any proposed changes to the code should be referred to the Planning Commission, kd/R-3.mem Attachments is .. R-3 District 2. R-3 Inventory 38 Zoning Map (separate attachment) 7AIVING § 36 -108 DIVISION 5. R -3 RESIDENCE DISTRICT (MULTIPLE DWELLING) Sec. 36, -106. Multiple dwelling classifications. Multiple dwelling structum pernuftted within an R -3 Residence, District shall be classified as foilovm Classification Structure containing R -3A • a. + s e. r a • e + + nr w 3 to l7 units R -3)3 ... + .......... Mare than Y? units R -3C .............. Townhouses, as defined in section 36- 124 of this division. (Ord. No. 245, § 906,10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -107. Definition. For the purposes of this division, "apartments" are defined as multiple dwelling structures consisting of at least three (3) attached dwelling units having entrances from common hallways. (Ord. No. 4659 § 906.000, 4- 19 -79) Cross reference - -Rules of construction and definitions generally, 11-41 et seq. u,j* &z4 7 Sec. 36 -108. R-3 districts— Permitted uses. G n LT In a . -3 Residence District (Multiple Dwelling), unl other- wise pro vi in this chapter, no building or land shal ereafter be erected or stru orally altered, except for one or a of the follow- ing uses: (1) All uses permit in divisions 3 an of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence Dis ' Us, except ngle- family dwellings, du- plexes or double in ess specifically authorized by the city council. (2) Multiple dwellings, asset forth ' sections 36 -118 through 36 -120 of this divisin (R -3A), sectio \cl*fications ough 36 -123 of this division AA -3B), and sectiod 36 -125 of _ this division ff -3C), setting forth t of such dwellings h size and by type. Any pnduct busi- ness in multiple dwelling structures ited to Such business use as the council may authorize at the time cif approval of construction plans and specifications. Supp. No. 4 2223 70 W 11rc�rAa«re 6 Z 7 • R -1 Residence District (single dwelling) y accessory use permitted in an is erm fitted in the R -E Residence Estate District, except . (1) sed car lots. (2) The rackin • g of automobiles or trucks includ,ing the sale of used cars. • District* • R -1 district is prohibited in the R -E D Any prohibited us in the Section 5. Section 3 6 (R - 2, Double Dwe ding District) is hereby amended as follows; r` Section 36 -86. Uses* a. Permitted uses. The onl rises permitted in the R -2 Residence } District are as follows: 1. An permitted us in the R -1 istri Any ct. 2. Double dwelli gs. s. The following u ses ma y P ermitted by conditional b. Conditional v use permit: • d b conditional. use permit the R -1 District. 1. Any a permitted y Section 6. Se tion 36 -94 is added to the R -2 District: Sec. 36 -94. Minimum floor areas. . each R -2 Residence District welling The lnimum habitable floor area for eat er �f- • east: five hundred eighty (580) square f p un shall be at 1 fort (740) square feet per • one-bedroom unit; seven hundred y f clency or o dred'sixt (860) square feet per three - bedroom wo- bedroom unit, eight hun y • housand forty (1,040) square feet per f ou r- bedroom unit. unit , one t • (R-3 le Dwtellin District) is hereb }• amended Section 7. Section 36 -108 Multiple S as follows: Sec. 36 -108. Uses. a. permitted uses • . Theo y nl uses permitted in the R -3 District are as follows: 1. Multiple le dwellings, including double dwellings. 29 Any use permitted In the R -1 District, except single - family dwellings. • may be permitted by conditional b. Conditional uses. The, following uses } P • use permit b conditional use permit in the R -1 District 1. Any use per y 2. Boarding lodging or lod in house, except a hotel or motel. 3. Nursing home. 11 C. Prohibited use: a single- family dwelling. Se tion 8. Sec. 17 -21 to 17 -25 (Home occupations) is hereby amend as fol ws: Secti 17 -21. License requirements. (a) ore occupations shall require a license if any of a following c'rcumstances would occur more than 30 days each y ar: 16 ployment of a nonresident in the home occ ation . 2. Customers visiting the premises. 3. Manuftcture of products on the premises 4. More tha- one vehicle associated wit /the home occupation which is classif d as a light commercial ehicle. 5. A vehicle(s) 4ed in the home occ ation, and parked on the remises, which exceeds a three- arter ton payload capacity. P � (b) Home occupations requiting a licen shall be subject to, but not limited to, the f ollowi` g require nts : 1. No traffic shall be g�nerate'd by a home occupation in greater volumes than would normal be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need `` off-street parking shall not ex- ceed more than three of f�treet parking spaces for home occupa- tion at any given time,,:/in', addition to the parking spaces re- quired by the residents. 2. No more than one nonresident a loyee shall be allowed to work on the premises. Nonresident emplo ees who work off premises may be allowed to visit Ie premises an on employee is parking on -site, off -site' employees shall t leave their vehicles on site. If there is no -site employee vehi le parked on -site, one off- site employee ehicle may be parked o -site. 3. No vehicle associated with the home occ pation, including customers or employees, shall be parked on the st et or block sidewalks or public easements. Private vehicles used y the residents shall not be included in this requirement. 4. An area /equivalent to no more than twenty ( ) percent of each level /of the house, including the basement an garage, shall be used /in the conduct of a home occupation. 5. There shall be no change visible off premises in he outside a pearance of the building or premises that would 'ndicate the . onduct of a home occupation, other than one sign m eting the equirements of the City sign code. 36 -108 MAPLEWOOD CODE O Cl,u lodges, fraternity and sorority ho s which do net offer p tic accommodations.. (4) Boarding a lodging houses. (5) The following s pursuant special use permit granted by the council on a Iication nd hearing -as provided in article HI of this chapter: a.ospi�, can' nursing homes and other buildings used for treat ent human ailments. b. Philanthr9pic and ch itable institutions. c. Any la�pter r use enumer ed or specified in article III of this relating to special use permits. (Code 1965, § 906.010; Ord. No. 245, § 2,10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -109. Same— Off - street parking. Each multiple - dwelling unit in the city shall have off-street parking space. Parking spaces shall be in addition to, and not part of, the driveways or maneuvering space necessary to the parking areas serving such multiple dwelling. All parking spac- es, driveways and other parts of the parking facilities shall be dust free and shall be surfaced with concrete or blacktop. Park - ing requirements shall be as follows: (1) An open parking stall shall be a minimum distance of fifteen (15) feet from a dwelling unit window and five (5) feet from any side or rear property line. (2) Parking stalls may not be located within fifteen (15) feet of a street right-of-way, unless section 36 -22 applies. (3) Where a garage or carport opens to a public street, the width of the driveway onto that public street shall not exceed twenty -four (24) feet in width, and in no event shall a series of garages open directly to that street. Where a series of garages face each other on a private road, the minimum width separating garages shall be thirty (30) feet. in order to provide visibility in backing out or turning around. (4) Parking shall also be in accordance with section 36 -22. (Code 1965, § 906.070; Ord. No. 231, § 1, 10 -5 -67; Ord. No. Supp. No. 4 2224 ZONING § 36 -111 245, § 4 (§ 906^030), 10 -3 -68; Ord. No. 555, § 29 11- 28 -83; Ord. No. 585, § 5s 8- 26-85) Sec. 36 -110. Same — Indoor storage spaces. A minimum of one hundred twenty (120) cubic feet of storage space, in addition to normal closet space, shall be made available for each multiple- dwelling unit. Such storage space shall be lo- cated in the same building as the dwelling unit or in the garage, but shall not be considered .as part of the habitable area of a dwelling unit. If located in the garage, it shall be enclosed and shall not be part of the automobile parking area. (Ord. No. 245, § 5 (§ 906.040), 1.68; Ord. No. 577, § 1, 1- 28 -85) Sec. 36 -111. Same -- Exterior surfaces. (a) All multiple dwellings in the city shall be designed and con - structed to have the equivalent of a front on each exterior surface. Supp. No. 4 2224.1 ZONING § 36 -114 .(b) All accessory or ancillary buildings to multiple dwellings in the city, including .garages and carports, shall be designed and con- structed to have substantially the same exterior surface as the prin- cipal use building. (Ord. No. 245, § 6 (§ 906.050),10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -112. Same-- Accoustical controls. In all multiple dwelling buildings in the city, the following stand- ards of accoustical control shall apply: (1) All plumbing serving each unit shall be separated from other units by a room, closet, corridor or sound barrier. (2) Party partitions and floor systems shall be of a type suffi- cient to accomplish a loss in sound transmission of not less than fifty (50) decibels determined by averaging the loss at frequencies of 125, 250, 350, 500, 700, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 cycles. Corridor partitions shall be capable of accomplishing a loss in sound transmissions of not less than forty -five (45) decibels similarly determined. (Ord. No. 245, § 7 ( § 906.070), 10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -113. Same— Garbage, refuse, etc., containers. All refuse, rubbish and garbage containers serving multiple dwell - ings in the city shall be placed at the rear of the premises. In no event shall such containers be placed next to the street or curb, nor shall they be placed so as to interfere with the use of adjoining property or to cause a nuisance or annoyance to adjoining property occupants. Such containers shall be covered and maintained so as to be inaccessible to insects, vermin or animals, and shall be screened so as not to be visible from eye -level height. (Ord. No. 245, § 9 ( § 906.080),10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -114. Same — Density credits. All multiple dwelling structures constructed in the city are subject to minimum area and maximum density standards as set forth in sections of this chapter relating to density and area requirements. The following credits to such standards shall be allowed as follows: $upp. No. 2. 2225 136-114 MAPLEWOOD CODE ( 1) Underground parking. The net acreage for calculating den- sity may be increased by three hundred (300) ware feet for each parking space that is provided under the principal use stxucture, or in some other manner underground, which will thereby permit use of the grade level outside the build - ing, or above such underground space, for other building, parking, open yard or recreation space. (2) Open space The net acreage for calculating density may be increased by-one hundred (100) square feet where twenty - five (25) percent of the entire area is reserved in one area for recreation play area, or for open land, water or ponding areas subject to approval by the city council after consid- eration by the community design review board. (3) Landscaping. The net acreage for calculating density may be increased by one hundred (100) square feet for each dwelling unit where one percent of the construction cost (not including land cost) is allocated to the planting of trees. This does not apply to the sodding or seeding of green areas. (4) High rise. The net acreage for calculating density may be increased by one hundred (100) square feet for each dwell - ing unit above three (3) stories. In order to qualify for this credit, all floors must have elevator service. If this credit, when combined with others available in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this section, results in a reduction of yard or parking space area below that otherwise required by reason ,of the dimensions and number of dwelling units in the structure, then this credit shall not be allowed. (Ord. No. 245, § 10 (§ 906.090), 10 -3 -68; Ord. No. 559, § 1, 12- 12-83) Sec. 36 -115. Same -- Certificate of occupancy. Before any new multiple dwelling building in the city may be occupied by tenants, the owner or contractor shall first obtain from the building inspector a certificate of occupancy, and such docu- ment shall certify that all requirements, specifications, special treat - ments, screening, landscaping or any other prerequisite ordered or required by the planning commission or the council have been fully provided or complied with and that all work is complete. Any unau- thorized deviation or omission from city approved plans shall pre- Supp. No. 2 2216 ZONING 136 -119 varit the issuance of such certificate and thereby prevent the ocm- Pancy of the structure 'by any tenants or residents. (Ord. No. 245, § 11 Q 906 .100),10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -116. Same -- Sanitary sewer required; water connections. No multiple dwelling shall be built in the city, unless a sanitary sewer is available. The determination of availability shall be made by the city engineer pursuant to demand requirements available or capable of being made available. All apartments shall be connected to municipal water when available. (Ord. No. 245, § 12 Q 906.110), 1,0 -3-68) Sec. 36 -117. Radio tower, antenna and flagpole setbacks. In all multifamily residential districts, citizen band radio towers, amateur radio towers, television antennas and flagpoles shall main- tain a five -foot setback from all property lines. (Ord. No. 392, § 2 Q 906.120(a)),1- 15 -76) Sec. 36 -118. R -3A multiple dwellings— Generally. All multiple dwellings in the city having three (3) to seventeen (17) units are designated as. R -3A multiple dwellings and are re- quired to conform to the provisions of sections 36 -118 to 36 -120 of Q . .. 13 906.200),10-3-68) this division. (Ord. No. 245, § (§ Sec. 36 -118. Same — Density and area requirements. (a) Density. Except as otherwise modified or specified by terms of this chapter, or because of variances properly considered and allowed, the building site for any R -3A multiple dwelling shall con- sist of an area of at least fifteen thousand, six hundred twenty -five 15 625) square feet. The density shall not exceed the maximum ( � q density permitted by the land use classification and people per unit designated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan. (b) Floor area The minimum habitable floor area for each R -3A multiple dwelling shall be at least: five hundred eighty (580) square feet per efficiency or one - bedroom unit; seven hun- dred forty (740) square feet per two - bedroom unit; eight hundred Supp. No. 2 2227 3 36 -119 MAPLEWOOD CODE sixty (860) square feet per three - bedroom unit; one thousand forty (1,040) square feet per four - bedroom unit. (c) Green area. At least thirty -five (35) percent of the R-3A multiple dwelling .site small 'tx- retained for and devoted to green area; except that, adjustment may be allowed under certain circum- stances in connection with the administration and application of section 36 -114 of this division. (d). Percentage for structure. The area covered by the R -3A build- ing shall not exceed thirty -five (35) percent of the site area. (e) Front yard requirements. Each R -3A multiple dwelling shall have a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet in depth facing any road or street. This setback shall apply to yards fronting on both streets where the building is located on a corner lot. (f) Side and rear yard requirements. (1) The minimum side and rear yard setback requirements for- an R -3A multiple dwelling shall be twenty (20) feet. (2) Parking spaces, garages, carports, or like structures shall be set back no less than five (5) feet from a side or rear property line and no less than fifteen (15) feet from a public street right-of-way. 3� rased The minimum front, side and rear y () Setbacks increased VA setba for an R -3A multiple dwelling shall be increased of to o 10 t -five ?5 feet b the most restrictive of a follow - 1 exceed sev y ( ) Y ing requireme. where the lot abuts a farm resi ce, residen- tial estate, single d ing, or double dwellingwning district: (1) Building height: Th building set ks shall be increased two (2) feet for each on t the uilding exceeds twenty- five (25) feet in height. (2) Exterior wall area: Where an exterio faces residen- tially zoned property, the setback of the wall s be in- creased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (h) Height regulation. No R -3A multiple dwelling shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed a height of thirty -six (36) feet from Supp. No. 2 2228 ORDINANCE N0. 633 AN ORDINANCE AMDING THE REQUIR94MS FOR SElBACRS TO RESIDENTIALLY-ZONED LAND . THE MAPLE WOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Sec 'on 1. Subsection 36 -27 (a) under landscaping and screening, is amended as fol u1s : (a) Ala Gaped area of not less than twenty (20) ja-'fn width shall be provi where: (1) A nonres iden 1 use abuts a re entially -zoned property. (2) A property zoned for single or double multiple dwelling u P ro P dwellings. • tion shall not apply where the The require is of this sub on 'a 1 -zoned property is be' used or is designated reside � Y P esi tial use. t ity s land use plan for a nonr , 1 _ (g)nder the R -3 multiple district, is amended Section 2. Subsection 36 119 , u as follows (g) Setbacks increased. • rear and setbacks for an R -3A (1) The minimum front, side and Y w•el l in shall be increased, not to exceed seventy- multiple d g five (75) feet b the most restrictive of the following y requirements, where the lot abuts a fa rm residence, residen- teal estate, g ict single dwelling, or double - dwelling zoning istr • e building a. Building height. Th g setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty- five (25) feet in height* b. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces residentially - back of the wall shall be increased five zoned property, the set (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) squa re feet or part • thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet* . encroach into a required setback mad• A building addition which would would be (2) use permit, if such encroachment be approved by conditional u P Greened in a man- s consistent with surrounding property setbacks and s Desi n Review Board . At least 80% . Her acceptable to the Community g of the addition shall be screened from abutting res idential P roperty. this subsection shall not apply where. the rest -� {3) The requirements of th on the City s ll zoned dentla -property is being used or is designated P y land use plan for a nonresidential use. • (d), NC neighborhood commercial distrrct, Section 3 . Subsection 36 -130 under the 8 is amended as follows: -1- ZONING § 36 -121 grade level measured from the front or street side of such building. (Ord` No. 245, § 14 (§ .210),10- 3-68; Ord. No. 448, § 1, 7- 20 -78; °d. No., 529v § it 11 -22 -82; Ord. No. 551, § 2, '9- 12 -83) Sec. 36 -120. Same —Two or more structures on one site. Where two (2) or more R -3A multiple dwelling structures are to be erected on a single site, the following special requirements shall apply to such buildings thirty -six (36) feet in height or less: (a) No building shall be closer to another building than twice. the vertical height of the tallest building up to a maximum of seventy-two o (72) feet measured from grade. (Figure A below) b) No building shall be closer to another building than thirty- six (36) feet measured from grade. Where both building ele- vations are windowless, this requirement may be reduced by one - third. (Figure B below) (c) No building shall be closer to another building than twenty (20) feet measured from grade. (Figure C below) G • (Ord. No. 245, § 15 (§ 906.211),10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -121. R -3B multiple dwellings— Generally. All multiple dwellings in the city having more than seventeen 17 units within one structure are designated as R -3B multiple dwellings and are required to conform to the provisions of sections 36 -121 to 36 -123 of this division. (Ord. No. 245, § 16 ( § 906.300), 10 -3 -68) Supp. No. 2 2229 136-122 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 36 -122. Same— Density and area requirements. (a) Density. Except as otherwise modified or specified by terms of this chapter, or because of variances properly considered and allowed, the building site for any R -3B multiple dwelling shall con- sist of at least fifteen thousand, sic hundred twenty -five (15,625) ware feet. The density shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and people per unit desig- nated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan., (b) Minimum habitable floor area. The minimum floor area for each R -3B multiple dwelling shall be at least: five hundred eighty (580) square feet per efficiency or one - bedroom unit; seven hun- dred forty (740) square feet per two - bedroom unit; eight hundred sixty (860) square feet per three - bedroom unit; one thousand forty (1,040) square feet per four - bedroom unit. (c) Minimum land area. The minimum land area for any R -3B multiple dwelling shall have at least one acre and the building lot shall have a width of not less than one hundred fifty (150) feet. (d) Green. area. At least thirty -five (35) percent of the site shall be retained for, and devoted to, green area; except that, adjustment may be allowed under certain circumstances in connection with the administration and application of section 36 -114 of this division. (e) Building ground area.. Building area may not cover more than thirty -five (35) percent of the ground area. (f) Front yard requirements. The minimum front yard setback for an R -3B multiple dwelling shall be thirty (30) feet. This min- imum setback shall be increased according to the provisions of subsection 36- 119(g). This setback shall not be required to be greater than seventy -five (75) feet. (g) Side and rear yard requirements. (1) The minimum side and rear yard setbacks for an R -3B multiple dwelling shall be twenty (20) feet, unless the lot abuts a farm residence, residential estate, single - dwelling or double - dwelling zoning district, in such case, the mini- mum setback shall be increased according to the provi- sions of subsection 36- 119(8). Supp. No. 2 2230 ZONING 136-123 (2) Regardless of building height or external wall area, the side and rear yard setbacks shall not be required to be greater than seventy -five (75) feet. (3) As provided in subsection 36- 119(f)(2). (h) Height regulation. No R -3B multiple dwelling shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed a height of three (3) stories, or thirty -five (35) feet, whichever is greater, measured from the front or street side of such building, unless granted a special use permit by the city council. (Ord. No. 245, § 17 (§ 906.310, 10 -3 -68; Ord. No. 448, § 19 7- 20 -78; Ord. No. 529, § 2, 11- 22 -82; Ord. No. 551, § 3, 9- 12 -83) Sec. 36 -123. Same --Two or more structures on o:ie site. Where two (2) or more R -3B multiple dwelling structures are to be erected on a single site, the following special requirements shall apply to such buildings exceeding thirty -six (36) feet in height: (a) No building shall be closer to another building than twice the vertical height of the tallest building up to a maximum of one hundred (100) feet measured from grade. (Figure A below) (b) No building shall be closer to another building than thirty - six (36) feet, which distance shall increase by one foot for each two (2) feet of height in excess of thirty -six (36) feet, up to a maximum distance of seventy -five (75) feet of separa- tion measured from grade. Where both building elevations are windowless, this requirement may be reduced by one - third. Example: 44' high buildings, B = 40' of separation. (Fig- ure B below) (c) No building shall be closer to another building than twenty (20) feet, which distance shall increase by one foot for each four (4) feet of height in excess of thirty -six (36) feet, up to a maximum distance of forty (40) feet of separation measured from g rade. Example: 44' high buildings, C = 22' of separa- tion. (Figure C below) Supp. No. 2 2231 § 36 -123 MAPLEWOOD CODE A� • (Ord. No. 245, § 18 (§ 906.311),10 -3 -68) Seca 36 -124. R -3C townhouses — Generally. For the purposes of this section, townhouses are defined as mul- tiple dwelling structures consisting of at least three (3) attached dwelling units, with no one unit or major portion thereof directly above or below any other. unit. Such units are commonly described as row houses, patio homes or quads and are required to conform to the provisions of this section: (1) Height regulation. Height regulations set forth in section 36- 119(h) of this division apply to all townhouses constructed in the city, unless varied by spec:...l use permit. (2) Area and fire requirements; No townhouse structure shall be constructed in the city on an area of land less than four thousand (4,000) square feet per dwelling unit. n0 more than eight (8) dwelling units shall be included in a single struc- ture, with separation of each unit by at least a one -hour fire rated material and with every second dividing wall being constructed of at least a two -hour fire rated material that extends two (2) feet above the roof and two (2) feet out from the front and back walls. The density shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and people per unit designated in the city's adopted com- prehensive plan. Supp. No. 2 2232 ZONING 1 W125 3) Floor Tie minimum le floor area for each R3C mul- ( (580) apore � ahali be fives eighty feet per efficiency or one - bedroom ,unit; seven h forty eight (740) square feet per two-bedroo m unit; 8 ht h sIx '' 860) square feet per three - bedroom unit; nine hundred forty (940) square feet per four- bedroom unit. Common use area. Where more than one principal use struc- ture is constructed on the same or contiguous lots, yard areas planned for common use by occupants of all dwelling unite ma y be counted in computing required lot space per unit for townhouses. 5 Front yard requirements. Similar to section 36- 119(e) of this �) division, except that these shall refer to the total site devel- opment ment requirements and each dwelling wait may be up to its particular property line with a garage, or carport abutting a private, not public, road. (6) Side yard requirements. s. As applied to the total development site, the side yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet in width. b. where two (2) or more buildings or eight units occur on one lot, the side yards between buildings shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet. ? Rear and requirementa As applied to the total develop- ment site, the rear yard shall be a m feet in width. (Ord. No. 245, § 19 (§ 906.400),10 -3-68; Ord. No. 448, § 19 7-20-78; Ord. No. 465, § 19 4- 19 -79; Ord. No. 529, § 3,11- 22 -82; Ord. No. 551, § 4,942-83) Sec. 36 -125. Same --As part of planned unit development. Townhouses, together with other types of multiple dwelling structures, or any combination of different M" of dwelling struc- tures defined and classified under this division, shall be eligible to be considered and treated as a planned unit development pur- suant to the rovisions of article V of this chapter. (Ord. No. 245, P 120 0 906.410),10 -3-68, Ord. No. 559, 12, 12.12 -83) Supp. Na 3 2233 Skillman & Arkwright R-3 RM Ski l.lman & SURVEY FOR R-3 REPORT RH Skillman Level oiled Undevel oped Location Zone Plan Ac. Ac. Larpenteur & Jackson R-3 RH 0 1 w6 Larpenteur & Agate R-3 RH loll 0 AdolphLts St. R-3 RH 189 0 Larpenteur & R-3 RH 3 w 2 0 McMenemy F RM Cts Road B and R-3 RMIOS 3.6 0 Mississippi F RM Edgerton & Rose lawn R-3 RH 2 w O 0 Skillman & Arkwright R-3 RM Ski l.lman & Edgerton R-3 RH Skillman & Edgerton R-3 RH Belmont & Bradley R-1 RM , Rose lawn & Arcade R-3 RH Roselawn & Mc Men emy R-3 RM McMenemy South of Bellwood F RM Mc Men emy North o+ Larpenteur F RM Larpenteur & Parkway R-3 RH Parkway Drive R-3 RH Ctyx Rd C& Hwy .61 M-1 RM Cty w Rd w D 84 Carey Heights Drive F RM Cty,nRdeD & Hazelwood F DC Wood lynn & McKnight R-3 RM Cty.Rd.D & Ariel F-PUD RM Cty.Rd.D & McKnight F RM 7x4 12 w 3 w 6al 0,9 2n3 0 0 588 0 0 1 0 2 w9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 5 a 5 Name 4-pl ex Map l e Manor Larpenteur East Mississippi Apartments Map I e Manor Care Center Tarry Town Edgerton Highl and Edgerton Manor Map 16 Val I ey 4s6 0 Bennington Wood -F--; 20v9 Gol + Course 10+ 38+. 80w2 4 w 8 Wood ynn Heights Townhomes 31w3 4- 5a9 44� Wood l yn n& pr i e l F -PUD RM 0 4.7 Cottages o+ Map ewood Lydia and Ar i e l F--PUD RH 4.1 0 Concordia Arm Radatz & White Bear -3 RM 0.4 0 3 -p l ex Radatz & White Bear R-3 RM 4 * 1 0 Lake Fridge Park Radatz & White Bear R -3 RM 0 one _ �... Ct y . Rd . D , West o+ R-3 FAH 5.1 1 b .1 trap l e Ridge Sout h l awn Costnty Fed . D 8( SoLtth l awn R -3 FAH 0 2 .O Radatz & Sout h l awn R -3C RM 0 1 n7 Brandt Project Mesab i F- PUD RL 1009 0 Maple Knoll Eleventh & Ar i el F RH 0 b . i � -- Cope : At l antic R -3 RH 2.O 0 Map l ewood Manor Cope & Germain R -3C Rho 3.6 0 heap l e Park: Share Sh erren & White Bear R -3 FAH 1 . S 0 Map l ewood Gen i or Care Cope &'Jan Dyke R -1 RH 0 2.O Co.Rd.B & Van Dyke R-3 FPM 0 3 n O Co . Fed . B & Hazelwood R -3 RH 4n2 0 Brad+ ord , R i der & Adel Apts . Co .Rd .B & Hwy .b1 R-1 RM 0 2u4 ... .... Co .fed . B & English Rl --PUD RM 0 4.5± _ Burlington Northern R -2 RM 0 4.3 & Skillman Northern Pao i f i c °•. State Trail R -3 RH 0 2.2 - -- Frost & Clarence R -2 Gh 0 009 Frost & Walter R--1 RM 0 2x3' -- -- Skillman & Clarence R -2 RM 0 2 .G Skillman & English R -.t RM 0 3 •G Frost & Birmingham R-3 RM O.5 0 Apt .,,garden typ e L arp en t eur St Clarence F-1 FPM 0 3m5+ Frost & English R-3 EM 0 9 w c Frost & Frank R-2 FPM 0 10.4 -- (includes 3.2 acre pond i ng easement) Frisbie & English E-w3 RH 1 100 0 English Manor East Shore Drive R 3 RH 3 w 4 Park v i e w Ct . L arpen t eur & Century -3 RH 0 9,a.5+ Hill-Murray H. S w Larp en t eur & F- F'U'N R .I OS 36.2 3 � Townho u ses o McKnight o+ Map) ewood & Maple Moods Estates Larpenteur & Beebe R-3 FPM 2x7 0 Southwi nds o+ Map l ewood I Beebe Road FIR-3 FPM 0 15 w 7 Southw i nds of Map ewood I I Holloway & Beebe F -PUD RM 1281 0 Archer" Heights & Forest Green Holloway & Furness R-3 RM 0 4.7 �- -- Holloway & Beebe E -3 RH 0 4 w 2 -- -� Larp en t eur & Beebe F FPM 0 4 w O L arp en t eur 9.4 Century t -3 RM 0 20 w4 ... ..... Larp en t o ur & St er l i n g R--1 , F RM 0 5 w 5 - -- Montana & Currie R -1 , P'UD RM 2 w c 0 Acorn Greenhouses • Condominiums McKnight & Chicago R--3 RM 0 64 w Q N.W. Railroad (Beaver Creek) Ivy & Ferndale R--3 RM , QS 10 w 3 0 Pondv i ew Apts " Ivy & Century R--3 FPM 0 4 w ? -- -- eaves Century Add ' n w R--1 , F FPM 21 w 3 0 Hawthorne 8� Century R--3 RH 3 w 6 0 Oakwood Manor Maryland & Ferndale F--PUD FPM 3u7 16w4 Beaver Creed:. Carriage Homes Maryland & Lakewood R--3 FM 0 30 w 1 -� Maryland & Lakewood R -3 Rte 888 0 Maryland W .of Lakewood R -2 Rai 0 14 - -~ Century Trailer Park R-3, M -1 RM 55.5 0 Rolling Hills Maryland Trailer Park R -3 37w8 0 Stillwater & Ferndale R-3 RB O.3 0 Apt., garden type Stillwater Ave. ` t i l l wat e r Road R-3 RH 11 0 Silver Ridge Maryland & Century R-1 RM 1 1 WO Century East Stillwater Ave. & McKnight R -3 RH 2.2 McKnight 7th & 8t i 1 l wat er Rd . . R -3 RH 0 2.4 Stillwater Rd a, 7th R--1 RH 0 2.4 M i nnehaha & Century R-3 RH O.7 0 Apt. , garden type M i nneh aha & Century R--1 RH 0 6.6 St i i 1 water Rd & Bush R -1 RH 0 2.7 M innehaha & Carl ton R-3 RH 0 4x6 M i n n eh ah a& Carlton R -1 RH 0 1009 Conway & Ferndale R--3 RH 2 vO 0 Brood:: v i ew & Century R-3 RH 6.1 0 Brook v i ew Manor & Century Ridge Lower Afton of F -PUD , RM 0 13.5 -- Dorl and Road Lond i n Lane & F--PUD RM 9 n 6 0 Connemara Apt s. 'Crestview Fond & McKnight R--3 RM 4.7 0 McKnight T . Houses L.ond i n Lane & F -PUD RH 21.2 0 flap 1 eh i l l s Elorl and Road Townhouses 1 & I Ma i I and & Crest i ew F--PUD R--1 29 n 2 10.8 Crestview Forest Forest Townhouse Hill wood & Dion land F-PUD RL 1 u 5 0 Crestview Drive & Londin R-1 RL 3.9 0 Tot a l s 458mE3 487a1 Grand Total 945.9 Linwood Hts. & Adrienne's Add 'n. MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks Subj: Appointments to the Park & Recreation 0 Date.. May 26, 1989 Aotion by Counol1v Endorsed..... Modified...... ej ected..... & Recreation ate Commission The Maplewood Park and Recreation Commission has two openings. One appointment is to complete the term of Cecelia Schneider, which would conclude on December 31, 1989. The second appoint- ment is to replace Richard Bennett, whose term would expire on December 31, 19911* The Park and Recreation Commission . received five applicants for the .open positions from the following persons.. Rick Scha.ra., 1654 Cope Glenn A. Bloomer, 2451 Barclay George H. Malloy, 729 E. Belmont Lane Cathy J. Tollefson, 2587 Pond Avenue Michael D. Fiebiger, 498 Marnie Street All applicants attended a Park and Recreation Commission meeting (Mr. Schara and Mr. Bloomer on April 17, and Mr. Malloy, Mrs. Tollefson, and Mr. Fiebiger on May 15). At the conclusion of the interviews on May 15, the Park and Recreation Commissioners dis- cussed the qualifications of each applicant, Mr. Malloy indi- cated that he 'was withdrawing his application at this time due to other time commitments, but was interested because of his being president of the Maplewood Athletic Association to attend meetings as a visitor, The Commission members voted by secret ballot using a point system. All candidates were given either four, three, two, or one point, and the candidate with the high- est number of points was recommended to fill the three year term, and the second highest to complete the six month term. It is the recommendation of the. Park and Recreation Commission that Mrs, Cathy J. Tollefson of 2587 Pond Avenue be appointed for the term expiring December 31, 1991, and that Mr. Michael D. Fiebiger of 498 Marnie Street be appointed to the term ending December 31, 1989* Att. Applications of Candidates c: City Clerk The Map1 ewood Ci,t Counc i 1 has uested the Park and Recr ate y �''�q a o f ss i on to review candidate's for appointment to the Park and Recreation Comer i s s i on . Thank you for your Interest in improving your city. Tease return this application to: ( Director of Parks and Recreation 1830 East "County Road 6 Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 NM1E K1cK Sc DATE :YLIQ•��'F9 ADDRESS �. �I S �I COP /JIJM(EWODD PHONE: NOME 7i% 4�'�y WORK 4? 33 k-F #OWNER: YES NUMBER OF YEARS AS A NiOWNNER NO NUMBER OF YEARS AS A RESIDENT WOULD REGULAR ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS BE DIFFICULT? YES NO FDUCAT I ON c +(, 'v K s •— • Lee, ^ v I c ems &V C �►e.q,+, ! � s i Co�•r -� . Ct • + 1C 1 PRESENT OCCUPATION AND E WYER `C w D o a( Cc 44 K ASAVA o * C'okv� k. � r. v i c e3 NUMBER OF YEARS PREVIOUS JOB EXPERIENCE AND EMPLOYERS (LIST LAST THREE) 11 ep. vto t •TC C L. Ne#-4e4L4-t- P-A Dlee Js ` i r. — ��r, v s e T Sam � 40��.. " ,nr 1 �'i c t d .• 1 r e c -� � 1 �-• -.� r a. t (,,� D r Tf E� • 0 r - '�y r �a �C Cw� �` • js k M •LIST ORGANIZATIONS OR CLUBS IN THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN OR ARE AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT. - IZW4 11141 k-A. /A *a"(/ flu it BACKGROUND OR EXPERIENCE IN PARKS AND RECREATION: i o� ' t Cc�MO A* rofter- r- x ear• r O r ke 1 �< i� �C C olle WOULD YOU LIKE TO SERVE ON THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION? AA Uh Z 4 %4 c4pft e- it PC 1".4' xf*4 64 asd-� ree. f A f' 0O CLr 0 /ill k vt CW&/6*Oh.0 1 +1C t0 -4*- 1 -0-11/vAlo 4,00r#�-A 41 Cal' &csLghst = Q � vi• 40 art 9 �k O �C k O ..•rre s( vi l ' 4-P �t� a JIDDITIOMAL CG�MENTSs PLEASE FEEL FREE TO USE OTHER SIDE TO EXPAND ON ANY AREA 1160VE. L • The -Mapleirocd City Council h�� s���c�c�ested the Park and Recreation Carmission to review candidates for appofmtsierifi � the Park and Recreation Commission. Thank you for your interest in improving your city. Please return this application to: Director of Parks and Recreation 1830 East'County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 GATE : •1�• ADDRESS- 2*152 /-ov PHONE: HOME777 / /,S . WORK 7/lVs HOMEOWNER: YES NUMBER OF YEARS AS A HOMEOWNER NO NUMBER OF YEARS AS A RESIDENT A,�Sfy MOULD REGULAR ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS BE DIFFICULT? YES NO f EOUCATION�� PRESENT OCCUPATION AND EMPLOYER t�idjQP /rj� ���jj� � ,rGy• jj&QOTBGT NUMBER OF YEARS_ PREVIOUS JOB EX ?ERIENCE AND EMPLOYERS (LIST LAST THREE) 01 iole LIST ORGANItATIONS OR CLUBS IN THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN, OR ARE AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT. 1 111% BACKGROUND OR EXPERIENCE IN PARKS AND RECREATION: �. 411 'AAV4 -.4 Gr/P AMP, AWL" 9M x:oa&x a-- aqua- in-erajr&oov"4**j � MOULD YOU LIKE TO SERVE ON THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION ?.I�£�i� i1 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: PLEASE FEEL FREE TO USE 0�TH R SIDE t0 EXPAND ON ANY AREA ABOVE. Ali 2� "the Maplewood City Counc i 1 has requested the Park and Recreation Comi ss i on to review candidates for appointment to the Park and Recreation Commission. Thank you for your interest in improving your city. Please return this app 1 i c at i on to: Director of Parks and Recreation 1830 East*County Road B Map 1 ewood, Minnesota 55109 ADORES PHONE: HOME,�_�; �y % iiORK HOMEOWNER: YES ✓ NUMBER OF TEARS AS A HOMEOWNER NO NUMBER OF YEARS AS A RESIDENT MOULD REGULAR ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS BE DIFFICULT? YES NO EOUCA7I0�� -�r) I�ir-ahjQt1 �Np �}in '1 �_l'1C:►r � - I �i7;� qirl� ��t�-c� PRESENT OCCUPATION AND- EMPLOYER =jjL-(Mt tee' HUMBER OF YEARS PREVIOUS JOB EXPERIENCE AND EMPLOYERS (L ST LAST THREE) ELI �Sx ff:±irj I (,),L - Sl 7 s iF j 1 aj LIST ORGANIZATIONS OR CLUBS IN THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN, OR ARE AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT. OAIrdef j 'S.O_hffr_1 rS , a LIC In ) rn I v r'�')' rd, i BACKGROUND OR EXPERIENCE IN PARKS AND RECREATION: jLe) tt I . rP,nrf,wi+i­,o 4i\r q-hp, nn.(J ) I - mc'n rc-� 1h .WMD YOU LIKE TO SERVE OR THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION? � �' ffy� am e K�T"&noel v onnanm W"Y1 4 4-hp, IrIoL re-n rriah l �P�C� 1. A<:z, n �y nvo nt nncr_ 4i�!P_ I J2L�L' I)\ if ir% ans Y -cf- ' tf / 44vr#A4- rA::) CA� 1 IA--JLL 7A tp_'. �y % WC, I'\ 4cm .�Onry\ -1 Y11 A C)l L L 1:16 ADDITIONAL C NTS: PLEASE FEEL FREE TO USE OTHER SIDE TO EXPAND ON ANY AREA ABOVE. • t � � -iz,4 rv) M,&O (54,*n 4a cr s ' ���sir�q Funds � qj)s sCt�d u��4h �-he nee °,scary ul P M�rt+ �bnnin� cu)ds�:yaer�isiny 6".Chu;-ties onop,.�Q. uwy4..k t}t�rt�u h �. s�,cnl ypar br six ��t gradprs a Iso 'Irx�lua Cbna�loe�`�ibn c�F�ndS SO OU.r bud'c{�i is nt vr5�, Camnxu�ity Nurser ��oI - ocCaS�a in�ol�� P16LnAIn� � pal$es -�roipp, pry- �.heol�rs Woodb(ly r)Iq0�.r� (� -nor �OCC�sior��t.Q �1(#i��r H e.l�r -Fora. hourpr o8 ram old r8 PufiLe,1?4 Perief s -for pre - ��I�rs - a y r6 ). IO .s � i�� � LuQS Qr1 CtC1iUe� n)ember �F ?6T, fl Ott (Sahel' 1�1'b_at�ieJci alp- men`lar c�&�oolS Cenci, lib �u.rTieere�i �r s�i��rcl.�L �m nor cnill�. ''S�r�� ens. on C'omrnission �C°c�r�1d� >�.rks o�.nd, st�rnm�r prr�q Las , OL rn oq kr aAr oj� and in our stimr�e�o�hl�fie� f Or ems Z-�eEl nv...ed'io"C�.U� 5om�%li� 1�0C�JL "`��COmmunitt� 41-�t Yes giver, t.�s SSD much. The, Map l ew�ood City Council has requested the Park and Recreation Ccnnmi ss i on to review candidates for appointment to the Park and Recreation Commission. Thank you for your interest in improving your city. Please return this application to: Director of Parks and Recreation 1830 East'County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 MAME_- M I G 14 la � � 1� � � : !� /l � rte. � DATE : - o - 9 ADDRESS 96 z tU / B S7*- i�%aD L -!l �� � n n � M N PHONE: HOME .�I - ,SL % WORK 29z -6-57 Z HOMEOWNER: YES HUMBER OF YEARS AS A HOMEOWNER N0 WMER OF YEARS AS A RESIDENT WOULD REGULAR ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS BE DIFFICULT? YES NO EDUCATION Sc I<wg in a (11111 L 7, 'ZZzZC&:U,9--,w a zzy se c PRESENT OCCUPATION AND EMPLOYER iC 14 A,> wicggpr 5 er )e Cc ., �� NUMBER OF YEARS Z 2 PREVIOUS JOB EXPERIENCE AND EMPLOYERS (LIST LAST THREE) mow 40V^i2 i D N 14 LIST ORGANIZATIONS OR CLUBS IN THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN, OR ARE AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT. . BACKGROUND OR EXPERIENCE IN PARKS AND RECREATION: '0V c N C WOULD YOU LIKE TO SERVE ON THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION? 7jo ,j A P A 7 C W Z4 5-a-'02"M An-Aj a A A r - W R O A A c I Si 6,0Q.57 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: PLEASE FEEL FREE TO USE OTHER SIDE TO EXPAND ON ANY AREA ABOVE. / ' � AGENDA REPORT � � AGENDA ITEM_vml _ v`__« ' TO: City Manager Action by Council:. ' FROM: Assistant City Engineer Modified__�___� SUBJECT: Geranium/Ferndale Storm Sewer, Project 87_20 Assessment Hearing DATE: June 5, 1989 The mailing list fc»r'thesubject project assessment hearing is hereby transmitted~ A copy of the May 1, 1989, agenda report that outlines the basis of calculation of proposed $500 per unit assessments is attached for reference. A resolution adopting the assessment roll is attached. Jc BAI jc Enclosure � \� �> 7F[): FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: AGENDA REPORT . City Manager Director of Public Works wGENUA ITEM Act i on by C ouno 11 Eodozoo�_______ Modifled_-_____ Rejooted_______ Storm Water General Assessment Policy/Geranium-- Ferndale Storm Sewer Assessments, Project 87-20 May 1, 1989 INTRODUCTION The assessment hearing for Project 87-20 was continued to May B, 19890 The staff was directed to propose a specific storm sewer assessment policy for the future storm sewer needs of the entire city. The adoption of a general policy would then become the basis of assessment for Geranium--Ferndale storm sewer. ' BACKGROUND It is estimated that approximately $8.5 million of trunk storm sewer remains to be built. This is based on construction of ponds, connecting piping, and outlets for storm water control consistent with thecity^s comprehensive plan~ Lateral storm drainage for individual streets and isolated low areas is not included. The trunk system serves as the backbone of the storm drainage system and in general impacts a relatively large drainage area. A number of the proposed trunk storm systems convey drainage from state aid streets. Therefore, a portion of the costs for these projects is eligible for funding through MnDOT state aid funds, either directly or through an off-system expenditure on the county state aid system within the city. It is estimated that about $1.2 million of funding Could be procured from state aid funds. This leaves approximately $7.3 million to be funded through special assessments and general obligation funding" There is a total of 3628 gross acres of land that has previously not been assessed and is tributary to proposed trunk storm sewers. In a � . cord with comment received from the City council , a breakdown the number of existing and potential low and medium density `^"rcel�» was made to determine requisite unit assessment rates. ��a i tely 4700 and 1�5��0 exi�ting or potential low There are approx ma a\rld medium density parcels, respectively, that could be assessed" - ,— - feet f high — - '� 4�6 net acres or ��1 2 million square ee o There are about u , . _ _ |�roi�ct 87-20 '' -2- May 1, 1989 density residential and commercial /industrial property that remains to be assessed. ' I+ all of the cost is recovered through special assessments, then the required rates are $690.00 per low or medium density residential lot and 13.9 cents per square foot of high density residential or commercial/industrial property. To attempt to recover all costs through special assessments would impose signi+icant limitations on the flexibility of scheduling projects. A more workable plan would be to fund part of the cost through general obligation funds. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council endorse the following storm water assessment policy. All parcels that have been previmusly unassessed for storm sewer shall be assessed at the following rates: Low Density Residential $500.00/unit Medium Density Residential $500.00/unit High Density Residential $ 0.10/square foot Commercial /Industrial $ 0.1O/square foot G01 coursesv play fields , cemeteries, parks, and open space are exempt except for parking lots or other impervious surfacing associated with these properties that shall be assessed at $0.10 per square foot. Churches and schools would be assessed at the �at ��f $0 10 per square foot with the exemption of substantial r �� ^ associated unpaved play field. These rates will generate $5.25 million in Current funds. To fund the balance of trunk' storm sewer needs would require the - appropriation of $2.0 million of general obligation financing. It is recommended that Maplewood actzvely pursue the completion t th ough several more enconMpassing ..of au trunk storm sewer system r area-wide projects over s limited time frame in response to a .current problem rather than small localized projects. Larger .projects are generally more competitively bid and have a lower ..percentage of administrative and engineering costs. Larger p rojects are more cos t effective and generally produce a more satisfactory product If the rate of inflation is significan t ..during the time span of trunk storm sewer construction, then the 'rates should be increased proportionally. There are 30 low density residential units tributary to the Geranium--Ferndale storm sewer. An assessment roll is attached based upon a $500.00 unit, assessment as diSCussed herein. This WOuId recover $15,000.00. The balance of $32,585.00 that was to /. � Project 87-20 -2- May 1, 1989 . . have been assessed would be financed through general obligation funding. ' ACTION REQUIRED . Due to the significant reduction of proposed assessments and change of basis, a new assessmen t hearing sh ou ld be called. 0 Resolutions to order an assessment hearing are attached" BAI jw Attachments RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has-met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Geranium/Ferndale Storm Sewer as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 87-20, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: ` l. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a coy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute thespecial assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement int he amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual in- stal I ments extending over a period of twenty years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine (9.0) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assess- ment resolution. To the.*first installment shall be added inter- est on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1989. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the _ council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but notmade, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when ' changed oonditions`relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits ' nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council , as authorized by Minnesota StatUtes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended don the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. N -a Action by Council.-; Endorsed...... MEMORANDUM Modified Re j ected... Dat e, am-awn" TO: City Manager FROM: Hoisington Group Inc., Planning Consultants SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Approval and Rezoning LOCATION: County Road B, East of Payne Avenue APPLICANT: Al an Kretman f or Gemstone Lie vel opment , Inc . OWNER: Pare Associates, Inc. PROJECT TITLE: C. Little Addition DATE: May 30, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for 25 single-family lots and rezoning from F, farm residence districtq to R-1,, single-dwelling residence districts (Refer to the map on page 8.) DISCUS91ON On the surface, the plat appears to be straight forward and reasonably consistent with surrounding development. The major problem is that the plat will consume approximately one-third of the site's existing mature upland hardwood vegetation and it will expose the northerly lots to Highway 36. The only solution would entail a reduction in density. The density guarantee provision in the Environmental Protection Ordinance, however, guarantees that lots cannot be lost as a result -of tree -preservation. The plat has been designed to preserve as many trees as possible. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the resolution on page 11 to rezone the property from F, farm residence district, to R-1 singl e-dwel I ing residence district 2,v Approval of the prel iminary pl at , subject to the +ol I owing conditions being sat isf ied before final plat approval: a Final grading, util ity, drainage, erosion control and street plans must be approved by the City Engineer. b The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as we I as the areas to be d isturbed for street construction. Housing styles shall be designated which minimize grading on sites that contain trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with, c » Submit a signed developer-Is agreement with required surety for all required public improvementsq erosion control , and tree planting to the City Engineer. This agreement shale include a requirement for -the placement of temporary fencing, during constructions around trees to be saved. do Approval of a tree removal and planting plan by the Director of Community Development before grad i ng or construct i on beg i ns or f i nal . p I at approval i s g i ven This PI an must designate the trees that are to be removed, those that are to be retained and those that are to be rep I anted e The provision of on and off -site drainage easements as required by the City Engineern +So Revise "Kenwood Drive" to "Greenbriar Court". CITIZEN COMMENTS Surveys were sent to the 51 property owners within 350 feet of the site. Of the 27 replies, eight were in favor~ , six were both in favor and opposed, six had no comment, and seven were opposed. The train concerns with this project were in Increased drainage. 2. Increased traffic . 3. Loss of trees and wildlife* 4a Compatible lot sizes and home values with the e., i st in neighborhood . 3 REFERENCE Site Descrigt ion , The subject property is currently vacant and consists of a total of 9.82 acres. It has rol I ing topography with a wetl and area in the northeast corner - and a s'igni+icant change in elevation at the north edge of the site. The elevation change approximates 32 feet in a distance of 120 feet over Lots 16 and 17. This represents a slope in excess of 25 percentfo VeSlet at ion .Approximately 45 percent of the site is covered with mature up pland hardwood vegetation consisting mostly of oak. Most all of ,the quality vegetation on the site is located along the north end of the property where it happens to correlate with steep slopes. Conversely., the lowest elevations are in the northeast corner adjacent to an existing wetland area that has already been established as a pond ing easemento Surroundin-9 Land Uses North: Vacant East: Single-family West: Single-family South Single-family Past Actions residential and vacant residential residential The site has been the subject of no prior rezoning or subdivision requests. It has been owned by Pare Associates, Inc. for 23 years. Pare consists of seven neighborhood homeowners who bought the property to provide recreation space for neighborhood children. PI anni Part of the Park side Neighborhood, the subject property, is designated for R-1 residential lower density. All of the land surrounding the site with the exception of the ponding area lying to the east, is guided for lower density residential - The pond ing area is designated as open space by the comprehensive pl an . The property is zoned F, farm residence district, which has a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 75 feet at the building setback I ine, The proposed density is 2.55 dwelling units per acre and the preliminary plat ,9 as drawn, meets all ordinance requirementso Traffic and Access Access to the C. Little Addition will be from County Road B which in 1987 carried an ADT of 1,400. The right-of-way is 66 feet wide and, according to Ramsey County's major street plan, there is no PI an or I need to expand the right-o+-ways Based on the relatively low traffic volumes on County Road. B9 the County anticipates that, when upgradedv the roadway would be widened to only 32 or 36 feet. There are no immediate plans for improvements to County Road Be Proposal The subdivision calls for 25 single-family dwelling lots having .an average lot area of 14,776 square +eetg a minimum lot size o+ 10,000 square feet and meeting all corner and interior lot width and setback requirementsm The gross site area is 9.82 acres with 1.34 acres committed to roadwayse The net site areas including a 0.23 acre pond ing easements is 8.48 acres. While the lots are somewhat smaller than prevailing lots in the immediately surrounding areas they approximate the width of those found in Litt le's Addition Block I 'immediately to the east of ' Payne Avenue and contiguous to the subject site. The houses on the south side of County Road B have somewhat wider lots in the range of 110 to 115 feet. The proposal is to provide additional pond ing easement in the northeast corner of the site adjacent to ponding easement No . 2275536a It originally proposed that the wooded hillside along the north edge of the property be filled resulting in the loss of most of the vegetation on Lots 15 and 16 and at least some of the mature vegetation on Lots 13 and 14. Some corrections will be made before plans are presented to the City Council While the subdivision meets all of the ordinance requirements and is reasonably compatible with surrounding residential developments the loss of approximately one-third of the quality upland hardwood vegetation found on the site is of concern warranting the recommended changes in grading and positioning of the cul -de- sac. Pub ic Util ities, and Services An eight-inch sanitary sewer and an eight-inch watermalon exist in County Road B adjacent to the subject property. Each have sufficient capacity to service the C. Little Addition. il/Little,.mem Attachments 1.01 Park side Neighborhood PI an 2m Property Line/Zoning Map 3" C. Little Addition Preliminary Plat 4m Tree location plan 5m Resol Lft i on-Rez on i ng 6. Citizen surveys 7s, Citizen surveys inters ange cuts IT OF r °` interchan e��■ anaaa Ilk S - 'Coil n R1 a or c lec or.-- � 1 interchange wo \ . ri 4 -1 OS , - It I - La 11 Ll - - r./ m - Mino Rh.c • O t / - - -►' LSC• . O .1 f `s. s R ..•. •.- _- ,� ,. o 1 rn Q interchan e - ajor collector g R_ S R hti �. i "' • _ ONE fr - Os R,1 2 + M _ • -. ''' O _ _. _ - �. -_..�. . ---� -- ` "M M .... I All _ go- Sc major arteria ..�.._.._.. _�._ _ . .. � . interc hange • • Lah00hteur r , maple wood L �J� y b CP W Parkside '- Revised: 8.5-3 NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 2 -13880 11 -25 -86 7 Attachment 1 6 -13.84 2 -11 -85 3 -11 -85 19 -7 • r: ip / 11 Tj cc � �� i • G / J vim• ,11 ett / t. S • S? ` 680 C o� s 734 sa ea t� 4� �►c .41 k `a a 3�. SoJ.c . tt �•1! h Is j ti Cali) Jr Z6 �27) Dp A W 232- '1.roAC ■ _ `-1 i .-Sac- (5) t510 .7 nt o _ 1.14 aG Z) 179 Ego ?204 o coo) Big Arlington Hills Church' zr "I �� 4� Cz 3, * ?+G 3 (179 , .� , �� Z..? S a►c.. o; a 1• :3 , , Q's fit (13) a �� i o 7) N 030 Z a �1 �0 93 Q t9 .29 a►a. ^ oC . a. t. Cis � h o30 Q 020 ,, I j OCe , 152 bts X12.5 37 ' 735 , 4 7 39 1 t, IV-U2 1 1 111115 I15 11 110 ' 110 Ito too 110 11n yo 30 , J' �i •` p N ' III I 1n O 3 2 _ N ti 1 I 1: _ ( Ito 1 ` ' 110 110 i 5 5 r� 8 0 . w. .�. i i o i _..� C %Ct i3 -`p 9 N N / 'X ,� °� fro ^ 6CO) s 3 - _� 35 3� ^'� 37 N - t o 3,26+ .� , 9S 18 to 4 Ito 11 ISO ' b �•, � F s •,.sue --� - -- k ' . _ • SI•2 o I _ !� L .4 BURK � 0 t38 33) c � �0 5 31 9 . ,�, � 19 31 too.o9 CSC) 1 i (.3�) „1 ��1 � 7 *1D y I 21 b 30 14 2 9 �► �� ` () 5 A. �) cn P • 24 '00 1 4 0 ,. 9 It 0 , / IT o ,._.i_ 114 ' 1, o ,....1., 1, 10 too PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 8 Attachment 2 AVENUE _ PAYNE 1 4i I I l 1w 1 1 P r AT C rI Sol 0 • v Cp o 0 S LC D- T au G) C/)! '00 N o p o tF A= j �f: `'•' , --i ? � °' �°„ �°, U' m ,��, Z m c°n �° Z R ii F�EFa €�F i~� I m r °_' 3 `° c� `° D r �Da a v Z o a -v rR # taa t� - -_ = =J -� �r p ? r- N "' -• tD O C W R F fib` �i_� - -- - -- ___:._.� •.• s' o -,D -, c� a M p > N M. IQ w C R E t R Eli I1 a► N r a �1 =� a C 1' 1 �� t i r Z ? Q w w to •AaI X t0• � C �• v " tt .. 1 . °r r � N J !III o, s rn� o r o o cD &D v, m Z Cn � 10 D Vol 0 to LC CD CL CD rb -n gig. 5zlo 1 1 1 it M IR !, J I - 1 9) Cn Cn C/) Cl) I R AC tisx f C N -► -+ -n 3 T 'n ?1 �• 1'i >s . , Z 00-4 03 0� w o N cD tD QQ "• i O O tJ1 Vt coo O OD O �I -� A LT 0 O CD tn• tn, to cn tn• < N N e w c OD p, - ci a< a a i j Cn Cn -n -n -n nn�In���nnCn p�tv�auw : Q fn> m 2"q m m m P C O j • n • " V / r r' Z I •psi tp -�= o m-4 r '► = D OZQm C-I �M o�,� --�z =r� gm� r-0o ,,..� ovg_ �D oz _ ; o � Q F O Z M y�a m m Z -v M m < m r 0 M mph -4 0 ;; M%o 66 :! Z C7 Attachment a:, a - et y k ken a a,. a s F � + � � ♦ ♦ L1 s s � ,� � � � � # t w V V ►ao a aft O OIL i is 64 l le _ KENWOOD �, DRIVE _ _( Kr m I IZY 1 13T ` � � / Ir % � 3 , w w � • • s t to -M ' '" �GD � � i I • i I •• W a l l JI I w w 9 laT t try • •s. r r, 1 P r AT C rI Sol 0 • v Cp o 0 S LC D- T au G) C/)! '00 N o p o tF A= j �f: `'•' , --i ? � °' �°„ �°, U' m ,��, Z m c°n �° Z R ii F�EFa €�F i~� I m r °_' 3 `° c� `° D r �Da a v Z o a -v rR # taa t� - -_ = =J -� �r p ? r- N "' -• tD O C W R F fib` �i_� - -- - -- ___:._.� •.• s' o -,D -, c� a M p > N M. IQ w C R E t R Eli I1 a► N r a �1 =� a C 1' 1 �� t i r Z ? Q w w to •AaI X t0• � C �• v " tt .. 1 . °r r � N J !III o, s rn� o r o o cD &D v, m Z Cn � 10 D Vol 0 to LC CD CL CD rb -n gig. 5zlo 1 1 1 it M IR !, J I - 1 9) Cn Cn C/) Cl) I R AC tisx f C N -► -+ -n 3 T 'n ?1 �• 1'i >s . , Z 00-4 03 0� w o N cD tD QQ "• i O O tJ1 Vt coo O OD O �I -� A LT 0 O CD tn• tn, to cn tn• < N N e w c OD p, - ci a< a a i j Cn Cn -n -n -n nn�In���nnCn p�tv�auw : Q fn> m 2"q m m m P C O j • n • " V / r r' Z I •psi tp -�= o m-4 r '► = D OZQm C-I �M o�,� --�z =r� gm� r-0o ,,..� ovg_ �D oz _ ; o � Q F O Z M y�a m m Z -v M m < m r 0 M mph -4 0 ;; M%o 66 :! Z C7 Attachment 10 r 2 N O O W W �IA �• =W a.l a r, : 31 .jO Z JiY>� m A. i Q~ dmN¢ a QOWv �Qt-$ 0- �aNt Q i wv� W W G~ O = Q Q X31 L.J = u .,r CL J O Z Z s W VZ J 0 • • W LCUO 1 � W a 3is< O a U W J OJ UA `"' oar. <• s •SIy i_•= •.s`f� •t �•' `Op -- �•. ` CC J uzjai �. `.'�_.;'y� ~ L SZ�. -� •Z'�"~""�'_ .�t�•. •' : + -•.�S V •ice aI�JF • •� 3 "� /l�i '� .t..i r' � .fir 1 • '. i'�`.: .�. � • .. �!�_.".�• •7. M _ iTf =M��7 t• :s , ••_' � ,f - 1 , ; a`.^t .g1jt, •sa : •`.^ � i C': _- .!k �va1V ,� �!; .� ��yr oor'Mc_.' _ ��� w� • , •Gi'�► `�C �t�'�.;��`i_t�,•�!4c ��1..r`J+*_�tl� "�; 5. c tt"�.�y y�tt� Gib; L'!+7•�ill�i'�e�iil' ''3M1.^,. 4 �•� � a'C•� � :2::1.: 4•• • t.t LLti'�./.L.7�•y7•r- Y��,�,� J� 1.. � .�,,� ^� � .� e� w � ��. PLC �• rL _c•. . 4'Oil •Cc�"!y; .Pi � +1� 1F 10 .X�`_ u.-�L�2 .4• •.� K-V�i. ,L�.�, t .i. �;r � '1 a ..: -- � �„^-� �Tyy " ,"f£ T ,: •r. � '. /����,.• ' �• �si�, r.L1 4i �C.tS K 7 �;, .i +. ! � - 1 r � •r.. {_ "'� •, !Y` . fL��.•� +hty1�(�i, _ �{. '�`1T�`�•`• � .iCi'.,,�1«)j!t .� 1�� }��.� � • • . AU_ t ;v`.�.`C�r" '"iii -�. �� I• •' 1 __._ lit. I j fir(, i4 i 'jj� .•y r� ( a w 'v_L �►t �� t yVj4 ���(. •_`,C�. �V . V .y,,•tG� ;)i; !1 4� � 1 � • •fti: r'i lY� i.yr`� `XG%`t�`C �� '�.y�`�� W �. �•���1 + -• - < • t • ` c }3 `4 pct 4r4;Y� v�cc��4 t rc�� •; - �\ f • .s� '!r`L�. GtA"'G�t %}��� �:itl-r� .4�.t.: �ML.vk a. �`• N::� `'C�.:c y. a. '`F.-T, : ' *�c.h :.aye`, •k` .�+� « 1 y La LX • *w-' :-t` L ����•-����., t . 4 :�L• �a� •�i��' lC �'. r.� 'i- •. •t�' a G � r � � 1 �`C 1w *•4 �`i. � . M .0� O •' a:.�' 4'` t►- �' ' f •b t7` (�' l.(, wit' 4` �•�ti Z+ `'l ' �' .c- :. fit. r i. :L c A �L -���T �� r. .t:it� r ��'.:►L� �w' W� O 1"t� Q W 1 1 X.�.�i••t� a "'��.4�.,r.i.Y7�ti'�t''.�•'.� O W� 00 �'�._� 'w -�1 ^`�'•i• w�L.Tlr1 .`~` -a1. T', •`y��.. `s!.t.0 )- �' m(, t 46 .4 1{ �;�� - _ ►:�'�tl�'�Cah' `+C� 'T�j• �4 ��.JW, IZiI XCi _ 1 i� 4r� '�•'�'�' � � 4h`y �� t�GEI+1..'t QUA W w W~ t- t>�� �. �: �. •,.! Y < <t ,s.• t �'•vc'U« $(AV) .•, gv �E'x4- ' y:l O o n►sar ,a t ,,fit► •'J. LC'+ ;_-4` ` `.► a` ` cc • -�L k :� =for, .�fr��_ ``' 1•• ••1 V l SL mzv Ak f a^�t ' � �C uj cc IL p W oul T17- •e�••K yam;, � "'ta.�� .•a til� :�• �i< • N w � i� 1� 1 w �1 - 1 1• «. 1 1 �`I a• i : 1 �.1 .1 1 3nr3*%W an�►•� 10 Attachment 4 3 w • N! < W 0 N s U1 4 � W i t i • s • • M O t s 3 r • s a I `�ia'•i O ,2•• A f � � A • s � M'� O s • p w s so s e s s� r sM J s� r= Ns lit • r r V Z ..... Z —Z P. w a. 3 W=ok C2 ... ZV W 5 MU Ut C% }J W J �► N r. Ng N> tu x < W m �~ ; us m cc O W °8 —_� ° I-, S0 } L = N W F• <� t t }J• .. 0. W� W . Q pW ccZ OW G 8 0 0 LL, r 2 N O O W W �IA �• =W a.l a r, : 31 .jO Z JiY>� m A. i Q~ dmN¢ a QOWv �Qt-$ 0- �aNt Q i wv� W W G~ O = Q Q X31 L.J = u .,r CL J O Z Z s W VZ J 0 • • W LCUO 1 � W a 3is< O a U W J OJ UA `"' oar. <• s •SIy i_•= •.s`f� •t �•' `Op -- �•. ` CC J uzjai �. `.'�_.;'y� ~ L SZ�. -� •Z'�"~""�'_ .�t�•. •' : + -•.�S V •ice aI�JF • •� 3 "� /l�i '� .t..i r' � .fir 1 • '. i'�`.: .�. � • .. �!�_.".�• •7. M _ iTf =M��7 t• :s , ••_' � ,f - 1 , ; a`.^t .g1jt, •sa : •`.^ � i C': _- .!k �va1V ,� �!; .� ��yr oor'Mc_.' _ ��� w� • , •Gi'�► `�C �t�'�.;��`i_t�,•�!4c ��1..r`J+*_�tl� "�; 5. c tt"�.�y y�tt� Gib; L'!+7•�ill�i'�e�iil' ''3M1.^,. 4 �•� � a'C•� � :2::1.: 4•• • t.t LLti'�./.L.7�•y7•r- Y��,�,� J� 1.. � .�,,� ^� � .� e� w � ��. PLC �• rL _c•. . 4'Oil •Cc�"!y; .Pi � +1� 1F 10 .X�`_ u.-�L�2 .4• •.� K-V�i. ,L�.�, t .i. �;r � '1 a ..: -- � �„^-� �Tyy " ,"f£ T ,: •r. � '. /����,.• ' �• �si�, r.L1 4i �C.tS K 7 �;, .i +. ! � - 1 r � •r.. {_ "'� •, !Y` . fL��.•� +hty1�(�i, _ �{. '�`1T�`�•`• � .iCi'.,,�1«)j!t .� 1�� }��.� � • • . AU_ t ;v`.�.`C�r" '"iii -�. �� I• •' 1 __._ lit. I j fir(, i4 i 'jj� .•y r� ( a w 'v_L �►t �� t yVj4 ���(. •_`,C�. �V . V .y,,•tG� ;)i; !1 4� � 1 � • •fti: r'i lY� i.yr`� `XG%`t�`C �� '�.y�`�� W �. �•���1 + -• - < • t • ` c }3 `4 pct 4r4;Y� v�cc��4 t rc�� •; - �\ f • .s� '!r`L�. GtA"'G�t %}��� �:itl-r� .4�.t.: �ML.vk a. �`• N::� `'C�.:c y. a. '`F.-T, : ' *�c.h :.aye`, •k` .�+� « 1 y La LX • *w-' :-t` L ����•-����., t . 4 :�L• �a� •�i��' lC �'. r.� 'i- •. •t�' a G � r � � 1 �`C 1w *•4 �`i. � . M .0� O •' a:.�' 4'` t►- �' ' f •b t7` (�' l.(, wit' 4` �•�ti Z+ `'l ' �' .c- :. fit. r i. :L c A �L -���T �� r. .t:it� r ��'.:►L� �w' W� O 1"t� Q W 1 1 X.�.�i••t� a "'��.4�.,r.i.Y7�ti'�t''.�•'.� O W� 00 �'�._� 'w -�1 ^`�'•i• w�L.Tlr1 .`~` -a1. T', •`y��.. `s!.t.0 )- �' m(, t 46 .4 1{ �;�� - _ ►:�'�tl�'�Cah' `+C� 'T�j• �4 ��.JW, IZiI XCi _ 1 i� 4r� '�•'�'�' � � 4h`y �� t�GEI+1..'t QUA W w W~ t- t>�� �. �: �. •,.! Y < <t ,s.• t �'•vc'U« $(AV) .•, gv �E'x4- ' y:l O o n►sar ,a t ,,fit► •'J. LC'+ ;_-4` ` `.► a` ` cc • -�L k :� =for, .�fr��_ ``' 1•• ••1 V l SL mzv Ak f a^�t ' � �C uj cc IL p W oul T17- •e�••K yam;, � "'ta.�� .•a til� :�• �i< • N w � i� 1� 1 w �1 - 1 1• «. 1 1 �`I a• i : 1 �.1 .1 1 3nr3*%W an�►•� 10 Attachment 4 3 w • N! < W 0 N s U1 4 � W i t i • s • • M O t s 3 r • s a I `�ia'•i O ,2•• A f � � A • s � M'� O s • p w s so s e s s� r sM J s� r= Ns lit • r r V Z ..... Z —Z P. w a. 3 W=ok C2 ... ZV W Pursuant to due call and notice thersof, a regular meeting of the City, Council af the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the cuuncil thambsrs in said city or the day of ' , 1989 at 7 p.m. The +allowing members were present: The fol I awing members were absent: WHEREAS, Gemstone Development Inc" initiated a rezoning from Fv farm residence district to R-1v single-dwelling residence district for the +:xllowing-described property: This propert), is also known as , Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Gemstone Development Inc., pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on , 198 . The planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be a 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on v 1989 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations af the City staff and Planning Commissions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following +indings mf fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. The subdivision meets all ordinance requirements. 2. The proposed rezoning does not substantially injure or detract +rom the use of neighboring property or from the character af the neighborhood. The proposal respects the use of the adjacent property and is reasonably consistent in 11 Attachment 5 terms of lot size and width with such adjoining properties. 3w The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, and the general public we] fare 4a The proposed change wou.) d have no negative effect upon or resul t in any change to the I osAcal ,. e # icient,, and economical extension of publ is services and f aci I it ies, such as pub ic water , sewers pol ice and 4 ire protect ion and schools. All but on-site public utilities are already in place and drainage is adequately accommodated is Adopted this day of 19890 . Seconded by Ayes- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS IS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I the undersigned , being the dul y qual if ied and appointed c erk- of the City of Maplewood Minnesotaq do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1 9 1989 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a +ul I true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk- and the corporate seal of the city this day of 198 City Cl erk City of Maplewood 12 1�S A !- b,�CO� Nf.Q N�1cz �c� t N4L �2o��2.Tc.I �o F3E DEV�Lo G �- I-�avti co�.JCC�'2MS wr«-k ia-F4 wR- rEesN�� -or 400 CA CA qc.- 3 sw�,M�� 4��2As iA-A Pe L- D D � e, A.] -T 4+� o o o t\j �&Crl . T C E $ e-0 w OoD T i-rR-r rte � CoGwwC`CD on1 TLI � PeO�i o2-Ccl E- 4. 4A5 f J)�-C- rS-CrkTE W\ENT 6P ui 62�SN�� N E� o Azv Mf 4 ES (\J L e N S� A- c-� Sl (�AV-FtG P� ON o V- 7k��c hl�� Ho M s 6-o ro� (o �.F�tGT W �`G D L0 i Q He)AA. ES , TO -5e �o oA R) C<, 0 E�4v R�W5'VL pt.,ewj 73 tpjLL 13i:vT�2 � 7T w,a-� -;:&rL TOt rnMT ON &AILL., �p rHE £f74-EGT S C) ti T-"'�i- uE( UN6" k KE,S � Attachment 6 MR, GEOFF OLSON MARCH E7, 1989 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 E, COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MILAN. 55109 DEAR MR OLSON THIS IS IN RESPONSE TO YOUR SURVEY TO GET NEIGHBORHOOD OPINION ON THE PROPOSED PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ON COUNTY ROAD Be WE LIVE DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT. WHEN MY WIFE AND I BOUGHT OUR HOUSE WE KNEW THAT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PRIME PARCEL OF LAND WAS INEVITABLE. WE HAVE TRULY ENJOYED THE OPENNESS AND COUNTRY — FEELING OF THIS AREA, NATURALLY WE PREFER TO SEE THE AREA REMAIN UNDEVELOPED. HOWEVER, IF THIS AREA IS TO BE DEVELOPED FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING I WISH TO EXPRESS OUR CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, 1, THE LOT SIZE IN THE - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BE AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE LOT SIZES OF NEWER CONSTRUCTED PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF COUNTY ROAD B (100' TO 115' WIDE). Z, MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE STANDARDS BE ESTABLISH FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION IN THIS AREA. 3. THE VALUE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION (HOUSE AND LOT) BE COMPARABLE IN VALUE TO NEWER CONSTRUCTED PROPERTY VALUES ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF COUNTY ROAD Be AS YOU CAN SEE OUR CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CENTER ON THE NUMBER AND TYPE OF HOUSES PLANNED FOR THIS AREA, WE ,STRONGLY URGE THE CITY'S PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT ARE COMPARABLE WITH NEWER HOUSING CONSTRUCTION ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF COUNTY ROAD B. THIS IS A VERY UNIQUE AREA AND SHOULD BE DEVELOPED IN A A MANNER THAT WILL ADD VALUE TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. SINCERELY, GOOLIV_Q_-� ov.-O 4t WAYNE J. AND JA E L. FRANKENBERG 696 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MN, 55117. 14 Attachment 7 Planning Commission -2-- M i nut es 5-15-89 Comm' ssioner Fischer moved appr al of the minutes of April 1989, as amendede Come issi nor Ayers-seconded Ayes--A>: dahl Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, Fiolaq Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik S etten ivo APPROVAL OF AGE DA. The agenda was 16a ded with the addition of Item 6. e . , Comprehensive Pi n ork Session, and the addition to Item 7. a. of May 4 and Commissioner Ayers mov approval of the agenda as amended. Comm issi er Fischer secon d Ayes--Axdahl Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal Fiola, Fischer, .0 Larson, Sigmundik Sletten V.- VISITOR PRESENTATIONS via NEW BUSINESS Am Rezoning and - Preliminary Plat: C. Little Addition (Co. Rd. B) Commissioner Axdahl removed himself from the Commission for this proposed rezoning and preliminary platu Commissioner Fischer assumed the duties of chairpersona Secretary Olson presented the staff report. A commissioner asked Ken Haider, Director of Public Work- sq to comment on the proposed drainage plan. Mr. Haider said there is an existing pond ing area and existing outlet which will be used for drainage* Alan Kretman was present representing Gemstone Development, Inc mJ the applicant for this project. Mra Kretman said it was their intent to preserve and protect the trees, ponds and wetland areas. Mr. Kretman said it was not their intent-ion to fill the wetland areas, but would lik- e to work out an agreement with staff for a pondi.ng easement to be created. Mr. Kretman said the Planning Commission -3- Minutes 5-15-89 preliminary plat was .proposed for 26 lots, but they are proposing a change to 25 lots in order to create more area in some lots 'and save additional trees. Regarding the street name changes, Mr. Kretman said they would like to retain the Ken wood Drive street names Commissioner Ayers moved the Planning Commission recommend: Approval of the resolution to rezone the property from F far . m residence district to R-1 single - dwel I ing residence district 2n Approval of the preliminary plat. subject to the following conditions being satisfied before final plat approval: Final grading, util ity, drainage, erosion control A-hd street plans must be approved by the City Engineers b The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as wel I as the areas to be di'sturbed for street constructions Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied withn cs Submit a signed developer's agreemen t with requ i red surety for al I required pub ic improvements, erosion controll and tree planting' to the City Engineer. This agreement shal I incl ude a requirement for the pl acement o+ temporary fencing, during construction, around trees to be saveds do Approval of a tree removal and planting plan by the Director of Community Development before grading or construction begins or final plat approval is givene This plan must illustrate the trees that are to be removed those that are to be retainedg and those that are to be replanted. The provision of on and cif f -site drainage easements as required by the City Engineers PI anning Commission - 4- Minutes 5-15-89 Revise "Kenwood Court" to "Laurie Court". Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes--Ayers Barrett, Cardinal, Fiol a, Fischer, Larson.) Sigmundik-, Sletten B. Rezoning, Variations and Preliminary Plat: Hazel4bpd Heights (Co. Rds C and Hazel wood Avenue) The staff rep t was presented by Secreta Olson . The City's directo of publ is works said the onding in this t 0 w f a e thee ar c' area was design to handle the drain/aQin this northern area. A commiss oner suggested that t e street name . be changed from "Haz lwood Court" to "Be main Court" to 4 avoid confusion kwi h similar numbers on Hazelwood Avenue. Sam Cave, 723 Terrac Drive, Rosev* le, was present representing the dev open, Ed Ca and Sons, Inc. A 0 commissioner asked wh her the ex sting neighbors' privacy had been consi ered mega ding the soccer field h D 0 t Drive h s i p e e er i v r h r D 0 tr h s I ei p e e eri v r r ei and lighting concerns Mr. Cav said because of the el t great difference in �\ ions between the field and proposed roposed homes, he d\ +o esee a problem with id no lighting from the soccer +'el ds . Mr. Cave said any possible I ighting problem a the installation of fencing would be considered with t sal e of each home. The commissioners discussed th +'ndings for a variation and what the precedent has be n f granting variations . Commissioner Fischer mo d the planning Commission recommend: 712 Approval of the esolution toXrezone the property from F9 farm re idence distric to R-1, single- dwelling resid ce districts Approval of .1 t frontage variatio, s for Lots 2 and 13 on the ba V.is that As They r uld not adversely affect the plan o I a spiritof the subdivision regul\i ons. Ba The treet is located to meet the 1,inimum sid yard setback necessary for the i st i n c..; ci y ho se. III. Approv I of the preliminary plat for Hazelwood Heigh s, subject to the following conditions being sat +i-ed prior to final plat approval MEMORANDUM Action b, TO: City Manager PhdO.rsed..... . FROM: Bob Generous - Planning Intern 110 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Perm it di-fle LOCATION& 1580 Sterling Street North ReJected---_.. APPLICANT/OWNER: Donald and Colleen Jamieson Date DATE: May 30, 1989 INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use. permit to construct an addition to their home over their existing garage. The garage is 20 feet from the street right-o+-way. City code requires a 30-f oot f ront-yard setback . A I esser setback may be approved with a co ndit.ional use permitS CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL City code requires satisfaction of ten findings for approval of a conditional use permit. (See resolution on page 8.) , DISCUSSION The main concern with this request is whether the addition will be compatible with the surrounding homes. At present, the house looks different from the surrounding homes, due to the flat- roofed garage in the front of the home. The proposed addition should make the house more compatible with surrounding homes. The addition would not be visible to homes on the north and south side of the lot. The homes across the street are in favor. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the conditional use permit resolution for the construction of a house addition ',over the garage at 1580 Sterling Street North. Approval is based upon the ten findings required by' code . (See resolution on page 8.) Approval is for an indefinite time period. CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff sent neighborhood surveys to 17 property owners within 350 feet of the proposed conditional use. 0+ the ten replies, eight were in favor and two had no comment. In Favor 1 . It will help our neighbors without harming the neighborhood, 26 We feel it would-add value to their home. 3 . I would hate to think someone would say no to us. 4. Because it is a home improvement for t hem . 5 It shouli d pose no obstruction to me,, or hardship to anyone in the area It's none of my business if they want to-add on to their house . Any d i rt or mess woui d on 1 y be a drop i n the buck et compared to all the dirt blowing around from Cave's project, REFERENCE Site Descri2tion Gross lot area: 21,817 square feet Lot description: The north half of the lot. Is a hill which slopes steeply to.the south and then levels off on the south side o+ the house. The home appears to be a one-story building from the north. Garage dimensions: 517 square feet (221 x 23. 1/2') Surrounding land uses: Single dwellings PI ann i n!j, Land use plan designation: RL, low-density residential Zoning: R-1, single dwelling Section 36-70 of the City code states that "A conditional use permit may be given to construct an addition to a single dwelling, when such addition, or part thereof, extends into a minimum setback ." i 1 /JAM I ESON . MEM Attachments 1. Location Map 2w Property Line/Zoning Map 30 Appl icant Is I etter 4. Petition 5w Conditional Use Perm i t ' Resol ut i on NORTH go, n jj V- J 22w 13 24 SA /NT PAUL X\ �& 0 Y J PE WAY 'JACK LA _NOALE RD a r LQ •R LA ii z Y c� i ��9 C. 4. Attachment �1 0 Q) Y Q N PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP 9 5 Attachment 2 L RL 17, 7 5' 13-7. 3 3 97' 0-7 :--7 5- 134.3 3 33 .95' -7 5.o ��� i5� (3� +(4 1) T.) @I Pz C) (5) (3) 0 27 r (.37) (7) 4 • 3 7 2G ^� ('��)_ 9 8 7 6 5 3 2 to w 74, r4 a 0 S. 0 2 54 ob 7 -7 5.0' 133 75.0' .14' 93.0' 100. 14' % 9� (7) 0 vi N '8 "1 ,DP,A1tvAGf 0 .93 0 lob " (o co a ti 7-9 �*A I C, I—ro) (54.) DkAtNAqa (t) 4k 71-43 10 11 12 13 14 15 a 74.+3 '50 115 .3 5 ac. zro 34. 4 4 0 W% (S- �) (58) 4 N 101 (13) 01018 01 657) j 7&.4 7 1 80 go! "4 100 9301 100 036 a Eo IDAHO AN R7 N3 o� .10 75 .a 100.0, 0% 15 (�,2�2 7� 4.. (2-1) (Z 5.) 1, (Z2-) tul- 0) fdo . 11, 1340 it 14 (& 3 Z (4.8) — 7 6 3 - 4.375" c-e 18 0, 0 (73) t) 4) ff." ) 2 1600 to 1 13 40 Li 10 1601 Ljo '(7 12 134. a 1 1 0)1593 3 — Z Q 6 5 17% ry � — C28� iso X. �, 1 .34 'IN 1587." 7 $ 16 (7() r 13 ; CD *.,. - .4 3 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 119.454 %A %r% ID (47) Q� 158 1) op (70 , 60 1580 vi 10 04 0.3, 7 C0 (32-) (33) (��4 L's yik rq 9 RAI#4AGE\ 3 3 10 0 u 64 .6 5r ESMT. . . \ 174.4.5 18 Iro. Y --T M ISE* in r 'I PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP 9 5 Attachment 2 To: Maplewood Planning Commission From: Don and Colleen Jamieson Re: Addition to home at 1580 sterlirpt. no. We. Don and Colleen Jamieson, owners of "-the home at 1580 Sterling St. No., plan to build an addition to our home. This addition will consist of a bedroom and a bathroom over our 22' x 232' flat- topped garage (see picture). Completing this addition will enhance the value of our home and that of the existing homes in the neighborhood. It will, also, make our home more consistent with these homes as ours is the only garage without a roof. Our purpose in applying for a conditional use permit is that we have been told that our existing garage is grandf athered in at 20 feet f ronL the city property line versus the required 30 feet. We do not plan to expand beyond the existing garage. 4-7 V 6 Attachment 3 7 Attachment 4 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the Council chambers in said City on the day of ,1. 1989 at 7 p.m. The +ol I owing members were present: The +ollowing members were absent: WHEREAS, Donald and Colleen Jamieson initiated a conditional use permit for construction of an addition over the existing garage at the +ollowing-described property: Ex N 80 feet, Lots 10 and 11, Block 2, Bradley Oaks This property is also known as 1580 Sterling Street North, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as f of I ows: in This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Comm issi.on on June 5, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be 2n The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 9 1989. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered -reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commissions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings-o+-+ act : 4. in The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2n The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare" 3. The use wool d be I ocated , designed , maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district 4n The use would not depreciate property values* 8 Attachment 5 5a The use would not be hazardous., detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, gl are q smoke,, dust, odor, -Fumesg water pol I ution,, water run --off vibration, general unsightl ines.s electrical interference or other nuisances ft 6a The use would generate only minimal vehicular tra+fic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue. burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilitiesq schools and parks Be The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and .scenic features into the development design* ion The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: is This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of approval based on the procedures in City Code. 2a All code requirements shall be met. .Adopted this day of 198 Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY ss" CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1 198 , with the original on f it e in my off ice, and the same is a. f ul I true and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permito Witness my hand as such Cl erk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 198 City Cl erk City of Map I ewood 9 �r i MEMORANIXJM Awtion �� -~ up������ --~~~=u___�____~~� TO: Cit. Manager ` FROM: Director of Community Development --d i -f i e+��--�~�' SUBJECT: Code Amendm*ent--RE District Rejected-__... DATE: March 23, 1989 Date Councilmember Rossbach requested thisamendment to clean up some outdated language. This amendment would have no substantive effect on the City code. The current language implies that used car lots and wrecking yards are permitted accessory uses in the R-1, single-dwelling residential district. This is not correct. RECOMMENDATION ' Approve the attached ordi-nance. mb/REordin.mem Attachment: ` Ordinance � ~ ~' . ^ � ^ � ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY USES IN THE RE, RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36-82 is hereby amended as .�llows (deletions are crossed out): - Section 36-e2. Accessory uses. Prohibited uses, Any accessory use permitted in an R-1 Residence District (single dwelling) is permitted in the RE, residence estate district. Any prohibited use in the R-1 district is prohibited in the RE district. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 1989. ATTEST: - City Clerk Ayes-_ Nays-- Mayor ' ` � . Plannin' Commission -4- MinUtes 4~3-' Commissione, Dempsey Fischer, Larson., C Preliminary . "rhe staff t commissioners. The present meerzng C g Commission recommend den i al of t e a I i cat i on for preliminary plat, come variations, relaxed urban" street, ican al I ows the City an additional time enszon, nial is based on the fact that the propose lots are no consistent with the City's Critical Area P n, State law roh Iibits approval of developments t at are inconsiste with the Critical Area Plan. Commiss Fischer seconded dahl , Ayers, B , Cardinal ` ^� Demp , Fiola, �� .. �� Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, S) etten D. Code Amendment: RE District The staff report was presented and discussed. Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the ordinance pertaining to accessory uses in the RE, reside` tial estate, district. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes-. dahl , Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fiola, ^ Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. ' South en 1. Revi e Conditional Use Permit north of the te 2M Condit* e Permit for this project 3. Preliminary Plat mm IV m� � --~0o �� ' . _~ �o��m���� ' -.~~ hfodi-fied ReJepte --� City Manager FROM: Hois-ington Group Inc., Planning Consultants SUBJECT: Rezoning, Variations and Pre?�����maw�y ��I at ` LOCATION: Northeast Corner Hazelwood Avenue and Coll nty Road C APpLICANT: Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. PROJECT TITLE: Hazelwood Heights DATE: May i.0. 1989 SUMMARY I NTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting two lot-width variations preliminat- y plat approv�-1 for 13 single-family lots and rezoning from F, farm resid*pnce district to R-11 single dwelling residence district. (Refer to map on paqe 6.) BACKGROUND The site has no history of prior rezoning or Subdivision requests. ^DISCUSSION The proposed preliminary plat meets ordinance requi�ements wit' the exception of proposed Lots 2 and 139 which do not meet the minimum corner lot requirement for width of 100 feet. A w�riation will be required for both of these lots before the plat is approved. The subdivision code requires that variations to the subdivision code may be approved when they do not adversely affpct the plan and spirit of this chapter. RECOMMENDATION I. A,pprove the resolution on page 8 to rezone the property from F, farm residence district to R-1, single dwelling residence district. ' ' I.I. Approve lot frontage variations for Lots 2 and 13 on the basis that: . ` A. They would not adversely affect the plan or spirit of the subdivision regulations. B. The street is located to meet the sideyard setback to the existing house. Z i . Approve the preliminary plat for Hazelwood Heights, S Ubject to the fol 1 owing conditions being satisfied prior to fins- plat approve-1: A M Approval of final grading, utility, drainage erosion s control and street 01 ans by the City Engineer, Tife grading plan shal l i nc l ude bU i 1 ding proposed ng pad elevation and contour. information fors each hone site, wel 1 as the ar *'eas to be d i stUr~bed for : street ccanstr uct ion. Deviation from this approved gr adin�4 plan may be permitted by the city Engineer, provided that the intent of the over al 1 car ^adxn� p1 an is cor ►�p1 ;�sc:� with. C a S'ubm i t a, signed developer-'s- agreemk -tint with r e t_t i r -e� I p surety for all required pU b l i c i mpr^c vement.s , the o++--. site st.or m sewer, erosion control and tr ene planting to. the C i + y Er-rg j.neer� . D „ The provision of drainage easements as may be- re �.� i. r- e� -� p 13v the City Eng i nee.r . �r o� a r by the Lrir^ector- of Far•k:: s and hecr pat :. rtrt of the grading and location of the storm sewer t � o t h Pond F, '�:. �* i t of a d &f err r •ed sanitary �ewer assessment of G Ch anq �= '► Hiab` e wGod CoUr" L. ► to ►► Ger'`ma j. n Cot..tr^t ►' . REFERENCE site Uescr i o t i on The subject property is currently occupied by a one -story brick house ( 158 5 County road C) . It has a total of 4.77 acres and a net area of 3.76 . acres . The subject property has almost no vegetation w i,th the exception of a few large coniferous trees 1 ocated easterl y of , the ex i st i ng house and a f ew smal.1 er deciduous trees located on the westerly end of proposed Lots and 9, adjacent to Hazelwood Avenge. It appears that most of these trees could be preserved but their loss would not be s i gn i f i cant enough to warrant a requirement that they be saved. The property drains from south to north and from Hai. el wood Avenue to the east to a low point . on proposed Lots 7-and 10 . There appears to be no outlet for this low area, .Surrounding Land Uses North: The old Health Resources, now Health East, office building. That portion of the Health East property immediately adjacent to the subject property is used for parking and a ball diamond., East : Hazelwood park, including a lighted football /soccer field Northeast : A large open storm water pond i ng area West: Single - family residential and one two-family dwelling lying immediately adjacent to proposed Lots 12 and 13. South: Vacant land south of County Road C and single- family res i dent i al in the southeasterly quadrant, of Germain Street and Coen t y Road C. Planning The subject property is located in the Hazelwood neighborhood and is designated for R-1, residential lower density by the comprehensive plan as are the properties lying westerly and on both sides of Hazelwood Avenues Lands lying easterly are designated in the comprehensive plan f or F , parks. The property 1 y i ng immediately southerly of County Road C is designated for municipal facilities, a portion of which is occupied by a Maplewood city fire stations Lands northerly of the subject property are designated for Rb , residential, business-high density district. The proposed development is totally in compliance with the City's comprehensive plan. Lands north and east are zoned F, farm residence district. Th e Health East development is an approved PUD . Lands lying west of Hazelwood Avenue and south of County Road C are zoned R -1 and the 3 two-f am I y dwel I inci adjacent to proposed Lots 12 and 13 is zoned R-2 The property is presently zoned F,, farm residence district,, which has a m-inimum lot size of lOtOOO.square feet and a minimum lot width of 75 feet at the buiAdi"ng setback lines With the .exception of corner Lots 2 and .i 3, all meet ordinance .requirements and all meet the minimum lot size; requirements The proposed density is 2.73 units per gross acre. Variations will be required to permit the use of Lots 2 and 13. Traffic and Access Access to Hazelwood Heights will be from County Road C via a .proposed cul-de-sac named Hazelwood Court. County Road C is ,designated as a minor arterial by the comprehensive plan as is Hazelwood Avenue between Beam Avenue and County Road Ce In 1987, the Ramsey County traffic flow map indicated ADTs in the range of 29700 to 3,300 on County Road C in the vicinity of Hazelwood .Avenue. The County's plans call for reconstruction of County Road C west of Hazelwood in the near +utureq including a proposed .+ive-+oot-wide sidewalk along its south side. The County anticipates no additional upgrading of County Road C easterly of Hazelwood Avenue in the near-term. County Road C has 66 feet of right-of-way and, according to Ramsey County, this will be sufficient to accommodate any future upgrading or widening of the street. At some future time the sidewalk proposed west of Hazelwood 0 Avenue shoul d be extended east of Hazel wood as wel I A sidewal k should probably also be provided along the north side of County Road C to provide a saf e access to Hazel wood park f rom the intersection of Hazelwood and County Road C. Publ ic Utilities and Services The proposal is to +il I portions of. Lots 7 and 10 for development purposes and pick up al I of the site's drainage with a catch basin in the street and a 15-inch storm sewer which will be directed to the stormwater pond lying northeasterly of the subject property. An eight-inch lateral sanitary sewer connection is proposed to be made to the existing 12-inch sewer in County Road C. A six-inch watermain is also proposed to -* connect to the existing eight -inch watermain in County Road C. All of the utilities in the vicinity of the subject property have ..ample capacity to serve Hazelwood Heights. *d/hazel hgt mem Attachments lip Hazelwood Neighborhood Land Use Plan 2s Property Line /Zoning Map 3s Hazelwood Heights Preliminary Plat 40 Resol ut i on /Rez on i ng f rom F , Farm Res i dence D i str i ct t o R -1 Singl e-Dwel I ing Residence District 4 x r REVISED s -za -s6 o -sa -a� t -oa -a6 e -26-85 110-09-85 -oe -as r IAA • i t L; L w w C ts. W � t O M V O V O • E = Principal gr1grl.i Interchange -mom for t�s��ettt �� � � shit s a s s sits.�t s s s ait sates A . D� collector JRB ON DC . 0 pop% to i E PION -- �....�.�.! ^�► .,fie - ,_,.._ _ MIA or srisl s._�. coo Rm sc• 1 � � -• P.C. os tow tow OS OS Iit sc RH -- ! Ls — c RL P LSC', '• �, .mss ir R L mac, ; an r ■ rt to rir at tt a s - .. BW - CSC - � ^ V r• In ar�h• p• • S • r i HAZELWOOD NEIGHBOftH00D 'AND USE PLAN 5 Attachment 1 Q N r 1 • �j i tMs ~ v V. • S S '! i ft • iC J ~ •� ' Z No •r., • ,• �O M •. • • .. ' Z 7 •AC , • tt • ' �S�IIs4� -• .. V O 4 396c. 2' � > > �7.• . .70 0 � c , 00 .47 mac.. cti • • 0 h' Y. e _ . i r . K .. O P ab err -__ - ��- 3 113+ �� 1r t5 i f W. 1 (3-4 ." ty f •• T. i � I ( �' S t i• ... 3� 33 •.; . ��,1 dal •. • . {► /. It 341 2 4 • • , S (Z481 26 4 Xe t .. - �► tttt ♦ K �. f i `t PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 i} of C+ W HAZELWOOD HEIGHTS for ED CAVE 8 SONS. WC. 2301 WOODRIDGE STREET NOSEV&LE. MINNESOTA 65113 TEL 462 -9667 *PRELIMINARY GRADING ��' . UTILITY P AN PRELIMINARY PLAT �/ \ HEALTH RESOURCES tt•,. • sT� r - f 0" eft ee t � + • 1'r - rte•.: 001 33 1 33 • v. 1 1 l• �./ Z 1 1 / � / Z I 1 1 (O •. t ` a s I: 9 I: 1�,lOOII. If,NOifI. is 1 , LIl�i110.1T. 1 1 =,- , 1 1 • 3r t e • • fM so I t ' O o, _ left 4 _.._/ •. ' i s I IILNO u. O J ' N �t0� S. -• M•• 1�nfs` \\ a 13 teuo� w ItD ROAD "C" � - - - - - - - �- - - - - - - •- . », feulw w tsRw[R set,tett f - - » ` _ � — • --- � COUNTY - ` � � "• >tauTN Lthti x w orsoe. >, -- -� � " ____ .+.'" ,_,_,_ C OUNTY ROAD MC» tw aM nM Z s. ae I Lr.a� Q I ualllo CK Isistin Cnntewr 0 ~ W 1- -0 . Proposed Contour t:• ...� ....... «•. ,,.,....r,•,,•,•t.•, osfCRiK10N -OP ►ROMTi *•e• fly •M Prepeaed spot Elevation The West 318 test et the South 1210 Peet of the fewthrest I/d of the _ s t .,...n r.•,. e. ». ,.,•;.,,.•...,•...•.. Sou boost 1/d of Section 2. Township 29. Rsnev 22, ese•pt the North I00 �_. . , •,,, „� i Mtvr► **retry that �N plse. apeelflptfew Of - -Fa j . 1 - •-..� Oralnese Arrow test and etleeot the Nest 264 feet of the South 110 foot. report wits Pret••�ed M fen air ender wY direct super- vie ine aad that 1 aw a 4011 Pesister.d rfet•eeinMl '� ' ••• «•�••• tilt Psnee fMtseer under the too of the State of tetnneeets. - - �;:= •� •-- {IINjM1NL,S4TMSRf J �:• Orelnago a Utility Net. 'TAO&M ...•,.. -... , -, '+ ' 'i i..w tex -► r Y TYWAL NfTALLATION Or *ITAIM re"Cf 10 PERT /RANT YARD ,,, ,,,,,..,•, �`'f�.. ,�,•- ,r,.,,, � .. n -- - -� � ! P[It SLOB YARD IOersOs f: AtrtNl as to- f -N 11N1settatiew Na. 06143 NdrtS. VA1_E IN FEET 20% Or L.AT ORPTN FOR REAR TARO N1NINIM ARIA Or IOTS • 10.000 SpVARE PUT 1. All *foot." control *ball M inatell•d Mier to VrsAinV and be MllisYAit7l vinralnoA •h►negMwt iorpth n[ ronatrnrtinn. 'MTAI. MUN as 01 StN44t PAMY LOTS 11 MIDWEST >>Ka•• _Witt [•Os!0!•- .LQwfsOLMp(L•� 2. Otar•ir)N areas shell be so4AM or eso4.4 with mul•h wtt%in 1 wets .• • . •• • + • • • '•• • Tnli rinv •Rravatien by Gre41nV tontre,t..r. rittlity cnntracter shall TOTAL ARRA - 4.71 Acre Land Wrvyors h Civil Engineers, Inc r•,• &4 any *roes 41et.jrb•4 by utility i^netruttlnn. A►r.A t%r $"to? • 1.01 Acre, 7entlfewar•M•RnaAANa1.t* ). wa••r•aint, sanitary sewer and stnrw sever to M approved by City of PVT APRA ).7S Arta ►I,p (••.n...l . q.wnwA• t7ro, tllwwrwne /Al if t. RI•„rinre ohnwn at front et heusw are top of VeraV• Osb. ioNRD ► - Form Residence malt TVA Alm S. �ra4lna In Mas• /reed Pert to be approved by City of Neptawned. .1st► Me, JRII..- !N* /PSM TAPO AS SUPPLI90 ST CITY M NAPRAW4 +D Pursuant to due call and notice thereof 9 a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly cal l.ed and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 9 1989 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The -Fol I owing members were absent i WHEREAS9 Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. has initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence district, to R-1, single-family dwelling residence districtq for the following-described property: The West, 578 feet of the South 1,,310 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 39 Township 29, Range 22, except the North 800 feet and . except the West 264 feet of the South 330 ,feet . This property is also known as 1585 County Road C, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: I a This rezoning was initiated by Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinanceso 2s This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May - 15,1 1989. The planning commission recommended to the c,ity council that.said rezoning be 3s The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 9 1989 to consider this rep. onings Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statementse The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commissions ,NOW, THEREFORE9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2a The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract 4 rom the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood and that the use of the- property adjacent to the area incl uded in the proposed change or p an is adequatel y saf eguarded a 8 Attachment 4 3a The proposed change wi I I serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where app i cab l e and the pub ic wet f are 40 The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the 1 ogi cal off ic ient and economical extension of publ ic:services and facil.itiesq such as public water, sewers, police and -fire protection and schools& Adopted this day .of 19890 Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS6 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I. the undersigned being the dul y qual if ied and appointed c erk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood. held on the day of 1989 with the original on f it e in my of f ice, and the same is a -full true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. I . . Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of 9 19890 City Cl erk City of Maplewood 0 Planning Commission •-4- Minutes 5- -15 -89 f. Revise "K wood Co " to "Laurie Court ". Commissioner Barrett s o ed Ayes- -Ayers , Barrett , Cardinal,, Fiol a., Fischer, Larson ,7 Sigmundik, Sletten Be Rezoning, Variations and Prel iminary Plat: Hazelwood Heights ( Co . Rd . C and Hazelwood Avenue) The staf f report was presented by Secretary Olson. The City's director of public works said the ponding in this area was designed to, handle the drainage in this northern area. A commissioner suggested that the street name be changed from "Hazelwood Court" to "Germain Court" to avoid confusion with similar numbers on Hazelwood Avenues Sam Cave, 723 Terrace Drive, Roseville, was present represent i ng the devel oper , Ed Cave and Sons , Inc . A commissioner asked whether the existing neighbors' privacy ivacy had been considered regarding the soccer f i el d and lighting concerns. Mrs Cave said because of the great difference in elevations between the field and P P ro osed homes, he did not foresee a problem with 1 i gh t i n g from the soccer f i e l d s. Mr. Cave said any possible e l sight ing problem and the installation of fencing would be considered . with the sale of each home. The commissioners discussed the findings for a variation and what the precedent has been for granting variations Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend: I . Approval of the resolution to rezone the property from F, farm residence district to R-1, single- dwelling residence districts II. A PP rova 1 of lot frontage variations for Lots 2 and 13 on the basis that: As They would not adversely affect the plan or spirit of the subdivision regal at ions . Be The street is located to meet the minimum s ideyard setback necessary for the existing house. III. Approval of the preliminary p 1 at for Hazelwood Heights, subject to the following conditions being satisfied prior to final plat approval : Planning Commission 5- 5-15-89 As Approval of f inal grading., ut i 1 ity, drainage erosion control and street plans by the City Engineer. Be The grading plan sha l l include a proposed A bu i d ing pad ei evat ion and contour information for each hDme site, as wei 1 as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Deviation f roar this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with. C . Submit a signed devel oper' s agreement with required surety for all required public I mprovemen t s , the off-site storm sewer, erosion control and tree planting to the City Engineer. D to The provi s i on of drainage easements as may be required '* by the City Engineer. Es Approval -by the D i rector of Parks and Recreation of the off-site grading and location of the storm sewer to the pond, Fe Revise "Hazelwood Court" to "Germain Court". Go Payment of a deferred sanitary sewer assessment of $1,284a Commissioner Card, i n a 1 seconded Ayes - -Ax d ah 1, Ayers , Barrett,, Cardinal , Fiol a, Fischer, Larson , S i gmund i k , Si etten C . Rezoning and Preliminary P at: Beth Heights Addition Linwood Avenue) The staff report as presen ed by Secretary Olson . Ken Haider.; Director o Public Works , answered questions b - y the commissioners re and i g the elevations on this site. Flay Lemmons , 1914 Ebe Court. Ste Paul , the applicant and owner of the prop e y for this proposal , and Kent Jefferson., the devel o e , were presents Mrs Lemmons said the restriction r�ega din the setback to the pipeline would be included w th th purchase agreement for the lots concerned. N -6 INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat to create 52 sing] e-dwel I ing 1 ots and three out ots on the north side of Linwood Avenue. put cat A woul d be a wal kway access to Vista Hills park, Outlot B is the water tower site and Out lot C is proposed to be bought by the City of St. Paul as a buffer for the police department's shooting range to the east, 2 Staff is recommending the rezoning from F, farm residence to R-1 , singl e dwel I ing residential for compatibil ity with the Land Use Plan. DISCUSSION (Tree Preservation) The tree preservation plan is not realistic when compared with the grading plane There would be much greater tree loss than the - .applicant has proposed . Revised grading and tree preservation plans should be approved by the City Engineer before final plat approval, RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the resolution on page 169 rezoning this site from F9 Farm Residence District to R-19 Single Dwelling Residential, 2a Approval of the Beth Heights Addition preliminary plat (plans received March 2, 1989) , subject to the following conditions being sat is+ ied before f final plat approval : a Approval of final grading, util ity, drainage, erosion controls and street plans by the City Engineer. be The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street constructions Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain desirabl'e mature trees and steeper slopes. Deviation from this Action by Council:. MEMIGRANDIJM1 Endorsed.... TO: City Manager Modified FROM: Thomas Ekst rand , Associate Planner Re ected.. SUBJECT: Rezoning (F to R-1) and Preliminary Plc-ftte --. LOCATION: Linwood Avenue APPLICANT: Chad Do Lemmons OWNER: Raymond L. Lemmons, Jane Me Lemmons and Chad Do Lemmons PROJECT TITLE** Beth Heights Addition DATE: May 89 1989 INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat to create 52 sing] e-dwel I ing 1 ots and three out ots on the north side of Linwood Avenue. put cat A woul d be a wal kway access to Vista Hills park, Outlot B is the water tower site and Out lot C is proposed to be bought by the City of St. Paul as a buffer for the police department's shooting range to the east, 2 Staff is recommending the rezoning from F, farm residence to R-1 , singl e dwel I ing residential for compatibil ity with the Land Use Plan. DISCUSSION (Tree Preservation) The tree preservation plan is not realistic when compared with the grading plane There would be much greater tree loss than the - .applicant has proposed . Revised grading and tree preservation plans should be approved by the City Engineer before final plat approval, RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the resolution on page 169 rezoning this site from F9 Farm Residence District to R-19 Single Dwelling Residential, 2a Approval of the Beth Heights Addition preliminary plat (plans received March 2, 1989) , subject to the following conditions being sat is+ ied before f final plat approval : a Approval of final grading, util ity, drainage, erosion controls and street plans by the City Engineer. be The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street constructions Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain desirabl'e mature trees and steeper slopes. Deviation from this approved grading p an may be permitted by the City Engineerg provided that the intent of the overall - grading Plan is complied with. C » Submit a signed developer" agreement with required surety for all required public improvements, dedication of necessary easements, erosion control, and tree planting to the City Engineer, do Approval. of a tree removal and planting plan by the Director of Community Development before grading or construction begins, or final plat approval is given, This plan must illustrate the trees that are to be removed, those that are to be retained, and those that are to be rep l anted S Deed restrictions shal I be f i I ed on Lots 1-5 9 BI ock I "prohibiting construction of any deck or addition attached to the dwell ing g within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipelineg unless the building wool b e protected from the radiant heat of an explosion by berm ing or other physical barrier as required by code." + » All present outbuildings associated with the existing dwel I ing shat I be removed. The existing dwel I ing shat I be removed or relocated .to meet setback requirements on Lot 7 BI ock 2 or i + t i s dwel I i n i s to rema i n i n its present location, the lots to the north shall be adjusted so a 31-+oot rear-yard setback, can be met from the proposed north lot line, go Dedication of Outlot A and Lot 1, Block 1 to the City 0 for a parking lot for Vista Hills Park, in lieu of park avai I ab i I ity charges. ho The City awarding contracts for the Sterling Street improvement project or the developer constructing .sanitary sewer to the existing sanitary sewer in Linwood Avenue in Deeding Out lot B to the City, CITIZEN. COMMENTS Staff mailed surveys to the 25 surrounding property owners within 350 feet for their opinions regarding this request, replies, one had no comme Of the 1 nt sik were, in f a.vor and four objected'. In Favor Cammen t am in favor because it seems they are allowing some uninterrupted space at out lot A to preserve the natural look to the p . roperty to the north of this development, 2. If the houses are of comparable quality . an . d price to others in the area, I Would be in favor of the project. If the project I though were to be I housing , I' d be very oppo Ow-cos , t or for subsized sed to its 3 am in favor, because of the 1 ow density singl e-dwel lots* If sanitary sewer and, storm I in sewer come down Linwood, full assessments would price us out of our homes We think the developer should pay for the assessments on Linwood, Lots.One and Twelve along Linwood should be left open*space, Lot One has a natural drainage pond Plus if Lot One and Twelve were left open it would help maintain the natur openness Of the area, al Staff reply: There would be no public improvements i Li n nwood Avenue that would cause neighbors any assessments as a result of this plat, 4U .It makes good use of the terrain with the road layout, but.. it is too high' density for the grade and I want $200,000+ homes theres Reduce the density, make larger lots, more expensive homes and give us access to the new park (which we have help Pay for) with a bike and walking trail a Jefferson builds cheap homes* (Refer to this respondents trail proposal on page 10). -routes Staff reply: The proposed lot sizes all exceed code requirementsis The proposed density is far below the max i mum density allowed, The City cannot dictate the minimum construction cost of homes. Access to Vista Hills Park would be via a sidewalk. to be installed along Sterling Street up to the proposed park walkway (Outlot A.) Bike traffic is considered safe on minor collector 'streets, such as Sterling, 5 is Ref er to the letters on pages 1 I and 14 is be It i on we have to a p y assessments for this project, I w i to c 1 aim a hardship! h� husband � have Y d d �, ed of � brain tumor and am going to Inver Hills College tai; i n program, I do not h g the 1 ego 1 assistant have a j bb and am raising two chi. l d I would not be able to afford t , r^en . development. O pay for anybody el ses Staff rep 1 Y: Refer to the r epl Y above ender Item Three I object because it desecrates the natural environm Shor~.cld not be developed. Kee f ent ., P or open space, 3U Southern Maplewood is being e i ng level aped so rapidly with n o concern apparently for saving any of the 1 et a areas natural b soot y found there . tom R eas are being completely .denuded a natural growth. Maybe it should be reconsidered, f 4a In our ,judgment this area will became heavily Populated in light of the previous development west and below the water tower. Th i. s project waLOd be acceptable t o us if Sterling Street was not madam a major thoroughfare are far ingress and egress to this development . At the re Sterling Street i s ost present time, court C of p ed as "read We prefer that . remain that way because we do not want �t traffic. Is it nt the increase in Since puss i b 1 e that a permanent gate be installed? the fill has been put in for water tower, we the rand leading ing to the have w-i tnessed this becoming a race track, Staff reply: Sterling Street set has always been intended to be a through street s$ Staff can a re ' y Ster^1 i ng Street as dead-end pp c � ate the desire to keep a� quiet et road. S* n c e its creation, however, i t was always i nt as a minor collector ended to continue south street. 4 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION 1 . Gross area: 39 acres 2. Ex isting I and use: One singl e dwel I ing I ocated directl y east of the water tower. The Williams Brothers pipeline runs north-south along the wester.ly side of this property. SLIRROUNDING LAND USES Northerly: Mary Anderson's Crests lew Forest Addition town homes. Southerly: Linwood Avenue and four single dwellings. This land is largely undeveloped. Easterly: 38 acres owned by Ramsey County which leases 7.5 acres to the City of St. Paul for a police department shooting range. Westerly: Huntington Hills South Addition presently under constrLxct ion . PAST ACTIONS On May 81 1989, the applicant was granted approval of a lot split creating Out lot C, the shooting r^ ange buffer, PLANNING 1. Land use plan designation: RL, Low Density Residential 2. Planned density: 14 people per net acre 3. Proposed density: 6.35 people per not acre (33.57 net acres) 4. Zoning: existing - F; proposed - R-1 5. Compliance with land use laws: a. The pipeline setback ordinance will affect the placement of dwellings on Lots 1-5, Block 1. This ordinance requires dwellings to be 100 feet from the pipeline. b. Section 462.358, sub d. 2.b. of State law allows cities to require the dedication of a reasonable portion of a ,proposed plat for parks, trails or open space, 6. Section 9-191 (Environmental Protection Ordinance) contains the following provisions: C 3) (d) A development shal I be I ocated to minimiz o e the remval of vegetation and alteration of the natural topography, (3) (e). Erosion protection measures I shall make i of natural may: L MIM use ural 9 inplace vegetationg rathethan the placing of new vegetation on site, (5) (a). Development shall be designed to preserve the maXimum number Of healthy trees. This requirement shall not apply to diseased trees or where a forester certifies that thinning is needed +or the specific ' overall health of a wood in which caseq a c: tree removal plan must be approved by •the City. PUB.L i C WORKS 1 • . Sterl ing Street must for a be constructed to state- mph roadway, ad standards 30"o" 2* The tree preservation plan is unrealistic, The grading would eliminate many more trees than are remain are shown to 3 Where. there is no s I t f ence instal I ed f or erosion control , snow fences shal I be used to mark areas in which trees are t be Protected. o 4 A sidewalk is PI anise d al on Sterl ing Street aY'S construction project for th s part of the at roadway, PARKS The Maplewood Parks Department wishes to acquire Lot On el Block- One, in the northwest corner of the pro erty a I cat I by Vista Hi 1 1 s Park . 11 Park ing mb/beth amem (TEBETH) a.tt-aghments: le Vista Hills Land Use Plan 2a Property Line Zoning Map 3n Preliminary Plat red on 4* eighbor/s, trail routes proposal 51w Letter From neighbor 6a Letter From neighbor 7 Resolution - Rezoning Be Preliminary Plat/grading Plan (separate attachment) 9w. Tree preservation Plan (separate attachment) 0 m 0 E major arterial Lower. Afton - -- fit. s C R Rm min r c If ctor M- Londin Lane �.�.��.:. �: .:...�.......�.:. i Rm Rh RI ER inor collector Malland ..�...........►.....,.,,, XMIM � t I C, C AK 1 1 r• M • Y minor c Alector • ��,�� • •:•.� �::� RI... w 0 E•r?+''�C•• •4:f 1 '•�. Linwood in now major c (lector Vt , 1 � 1 CL i c � CO 1 i VISTA HILLS LAND USE PLAN 7 WORKMOus Attachment 1 0 0 .a E O O 1 Q m V 4 N jr -t -4 >_ Crestview �- Forest Town Home 2%t E P -'A-r C ✓ P ;-;z_ FOR E7AI;.� RUTH. H � untington Hills South Plat Water Tower 2515 R1 T 11T Proposed Beth Heights -,prat St, Paul Police Dept, - 0 �� •`�' - Shooting 9 Ran g O.: T LOT E o .. PO nth n IV 2 ti n�o 0 0 1.3 0 �. Yt ' c ' r '' -' ••O 2 516 �,,�1 �02� ti ; ' r. .88 ac °1 ai 9U CC PROPERTY LINE /ZONING'MAP 4 8 Attachment 2 2. oo jr -t -4 >_ Crestview �- Forest Town Home 2%t E P -'A-r C ✓ P ;-;z_ FOR E7AI;.� RUTH. H � untington Hills South Plat Water Tower 2515 R1 T 11T Proposed Beth Heights -,prat St, Paul Police Dept, - 0 �� •`�' - Shooting 9 Ran g O.: T LOT E o .. PO nth n IV 2 ti n�o 0 0 1.3 0 �. Yt ' c ' r '' -' ••O 2 516 �,,�1 �02� ti ; ' r. .88 ac °1 ai 9U CC PROPERTY LINE /ZONING'MAP 4 8 Attachment 2 Revised Preliminary Plat of: 0 0 BETH HEIGHTS ADDITION �J,:,J��,I�1,�'� J., -1 'O ':�j A , 1 ff . IZZ 1z , 1 \,\ SIV '�T— 77� ell 4 \% Owner I' _X—k--\ 4W Ij 15 111% CHADLEMMONS 4 415 14 0 0 13 N 0 )i �t\, ' T� �\\ (}�� li 2 1, , K XV N` I­1' I bl" eC 1r r Ic r47,A� H5 t % .3 \/0, 3 If ko % 90P K x % Developer KENT W. JEFFERSON (Jefferson Homes) 4530 Highway 61 While Bear Lake. Minnesota 55110 Tel: 429-5309 % 4 0 �AS6ME/vr- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CC X W a R E !e V. All of the Southwest (1kistlar of the SoutheAst quarter of It 4 ()40 Section 12. Township 28, Raw 22. Ramsey County, Minnesota. 01 F 4- % T - z 44"- - � 7\0 .- III ai '07 : 19 qc to, 104 0 51) all- lot Vii . I aA 5 71 � 0 'A ( .0. _N , / I. \ , 4- SO 14 -1 �� — _fjolk 1060 N 18 0/ IZ- YN __ - - 11 _:�­ - I • NN k4 6T It f -�,00% toy .I- 4 0 ?5 -41 4$ 7: 40 1-� 's, - - ;` I \ \I \ 1 -7/,/ / / f 11 - . - 0 k\ V� It N, If I % 11 1 / t f t If CD f \4 t/ W %v \000" 4 Z 4� 141 t1.1 I Ik '00, i >-, 104 0 1040 4, '0� 1030 3 L- - 01 'A 2 12 q �-1050 /3S 100 170' l- It 7= O oiki _zz s Z 0P 1040-- 10?0 - j ttt V .-;-r 1030 .-1040 7 _j Z110 X ,b • e X 1 IP I It 7/ V Cl+ 0OF _j 111104114 - 08" 1 lit C-+. I A 14- TYPICAL SETBACKS may/ 1 4,,_ __3 j \ ", 4, 1, 0 5 M % � x 1?11 Jrp 7 lit 3ti /< lit IN i.10 NV00111 \ ', 1 ` �' ` 3 It '- —Z!- 1040 3 10 4 0 (D fl4lb I b ij .0) - I ? I I W� !�, - " '__� �14 -j Zt, 1031D If V/ 1, 17+ N� -,"" _\ 1% A \ A;�A Z 0 7 "Z \2 r% 1020 XA) '0 Ir 5 IQ 3 7:� 1010 — d r 7, VA V 105 0 COO ,z y rxrz r oe -I- o� r50 /ly 'U6 14 0 101 < 77n. 4 1-7119 Ss 0 Q a c,i 11) VI, 0 9,0 Nil, 1p's 'ftgVW -sr", f,17 lin C P ,S','! /1c S'4' `a 0 Sc C. ".2 1 7- 2 9, 4.72 North Scale: I Inch = 100 I nw*tw OWUI, Vol ra V;il-. — rexrt was pft;eriet by in* vorider ry en, :: -,L;,r,vivcn a•�d isal I w. a d0f Rev%%-rd Lard 5g.,06"W Un&r the but of the State of Afiwe*&JL Z-to -are SONY � A/00 LAND 9URVEY099 g56cI Zey,qlon Ave. Nc. Oirclt Pints Wmtsold 55014 Telephone 1A 9 - " U5 C , - —3 C) C+ C+ FD =3 C+ _P* ri 0: T vi lao 1030 1020 solo Revised 0 top Preliminary Plat of: BETH HEIGHTS ADDITION r K1• I A D LOCKHONNIA11 /— . ,s� , . ' __�o, T ty &I Ij U IT VU ca I" 3W.; %ou 11 T •' Ir oo —oe •r.)W f of J.: -0 fob % AMM f Fejec Loc ak % 0 5 -,14 % pill. 13 A 1 • N ♦ j. I V I I ,00 � .. - - - i ; Developer KENT W. JEFFERSON 3 12 ILI (Jefferson Homes) lo, 4530 Highway 61 f,�. % while Beat take, um*sota SS Ito of TO 429 5309 oil V 5 c 4c 2 Ito r .OTC Ito V 19 0 - 16 It % I 10 r1r, A 7: A 01. 1 18 1c, 4 19 V 3 Owner f % IV % CHAD LEMMONS U 7 1-f-ex.;ff /0,17 Ale. 0000p V, % 1.;0; $A N • A t o:. 27 01 1 25 %�-loso � Oil 1,2 4 • -1 3 2 -'t 0#0 1060 10 6- A -�: 050 10,10 —1040 I'd Flo" % -7 ;40? .4 T M A or 0' /cl - 0 ;...' - I I \�, 0 k t4 ?I,, `14 ;j )• 5- T 5: 1040 40, ), IW t S 7 Y z % 40 M 10 cor *�o 4 .3r .0 M 1 10 64 to 4 6/ 0 0 09 . AVIE N Ut Ole to J?/p Ci 141 p 0 N Y, I opf 4j 'W Q1IG� 0 6 4 77- i f � �A r 111,011, jllj�, , ...� ._.�. --ten- - -•.- -� �� � . _-�= C�c�l' � , �� }, "o/ 0*2, It At 15� -�,7 1/01- � w �. ,�, . r -- � � � -fir ��-C� � •l� � i . all 11 Attachment 5 (_ . rI f i • 3 . 1 .1 Zol�L ol Pill 2:g 07 • .. �, 6 0 . L • , ' y A 12 L .A' r lie C � 1 j; c � �Q 1 f i' ,q- (`-tea I ' I t 13 CITY OF 0 ,�$9 M....APLEWO OD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 07 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612- 770 -4560 Ma1co]m B. & Ri • nda H. Rawl i n s February or Occupant 9 y 28, 1989 590 Deer Ridge Lane NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY ' Maplewood, MN 5511 9 :. This survey is to get your opinion on an a 1 ica pp t iron the City has received to develop property in P P P y your neighborhood. The application is for a preliminary plat for 55 single-dwelling 1 in 9 g lots and two out lots on the north side of Linwood Avenue. (See the enclosed maps. . The app 1 i c a n t i s Cha d Le mmo ns . If you object, describe below or draw on the enclosed ma an changes that would make this project acceptable, P y � P � ptable. If no changes would make it acceptable, how should this property 4 p party be developed. ,r Project: •Beth Heights - Addition) ion) Use reverse side if more ' '•'=_room is needed. i J 14 Attachment 6 Your opinion is needed to assist the City staff and Planning a nn i ng n in preparing completed, a recommendation to the :City Council. Y Once this • survey is you will be notified of any public hearings, rid Plea se indicate your opinion and comments below and return only this .. `:': ''• cover letter the V enclosed (and any . attachments on which you have w r itten) , postage -paid to me ' � n envelope by March 10 19890 • you would like further information., _ pl ease call me at 770 4562 between � a, m. and 5 p, m. Thank you f or our comments. nts. Y They w i l l be careful cons iderat ion. given ... GE F OLSON, .1 AICP DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY V DE ELOPMENT .. ..: Enclosure(s) .. _ I am in favor of this proposal 1 because P P I have no coo mme nt . Of I object to this proposal because If you object, describe below or draw on the enclosed ma an changes that would make this project acceptable, P y � P � ptable. If no changes would make it acceptable, how should this property 4 p party be developed. ,r Project: •Beth Heights - Addition) ion) Use reverse side if more ' '•'=_room is needed. i J 14 Attachment 6 r �C • /10 te Ole CL -I 0 c z/J OeC% .0 Ctqj4lj, k -t GD eoo*07 0 J,*4 op ooe_ Vol '.r.w r.• r fir. /y/ f • o a P r.• i . -• t 15 PUrsuant to due call and notice thereof , a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said City on the day of 1 198 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, -farm residential to R-1 Single Dwelling for the following-described property: The southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 229 Ramsey Countyq Minnesota, WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: is, This rezoning was initiated pursuant. to Chapter 36 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, .) 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on 1 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 198 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was PL.tbl ished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described- rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: in The proposed change is consistent with the 'spiritg purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2w The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of-neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded., . 3a The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare, 4a The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the I ogical off icient 9 and economical extension of public services and facilitiesq such as public waters sewers, police and fire protection and schools, 16 Attachment 7 Adopted this day of 198 Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SSIN CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersignedg being the duly qualified.and appointed Cl erg; of t.he City of Maplewood* Minnesota, do hereby. certify that I have C:aref ul I y compared the attached and f oregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 1989 with the original on file in my Off ice, and the same is a +ul 1 true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as. the same relates to this rezoning,, Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 9 19896 City C1 erg:: City of Maplewood 17 Planning Comm i ss i on -5- Minutes 5 -1 5--89 An Approval of final grading, uti1 ity, drainage erosion control nd street plans by the City Engineer, D. The grading plan s al 1' i nc 1 Ltd a proposed building pad el evat ' on and c ntour information for each home site, s wel i as the areas to be disturbed for street cons uct .ion . Deviation from this approved gr d i. , g plan may be permitted by the City g i neer , provided that the intent of the over 1 1 grading plan is complied with. Ca Submit a signed de lope 's agreement with required surety f I a l l r qu i red public improvements, t h off -sit storm sewer, erosion control and tre planting o the City Engineer. Do The provision of drainage a sements as may be required by he City Enginee Em Approval the Director of F rks and Recreat i of the off --site gra ing and location of the orm sewer to the pond F. Fevis "Hazelwood Court" to "Ge ain Court" Go Fay en t of a deferred sanitary se er assessment of 1,284a Comm i i on er Cardinal seconded Ayes-. x d ah l , Ayers , arrett , Cardinal , Fiol a, F i scher , Larson , S i g mun d i k, • S1 etten ca Rezoning and Preliminary Plat: Beth Heights Addition (Linwood Avenue) The staff- report was presented by Secretary Olson. Ken Haider, Director of Public Works, answered questions by the commissioners regarding the elevations on this site. Ray Lemmons , 1914 Ebertz Court , St . Paul , the app l i c ant and owner of the property for this proposal , and Kent Jefferson, the developer, were present. Mr. L.emmons said the restriction regarding the setback to the pipeline would be included with the purchase agreement for the 1 ots concerned . Planning Commission --6- M i nutes 5.15-89 The Director of Publ is Works after considering the dra inage p an discussed pons ibl e areas where trees coul d be retained. Commissioner Larson moved the Planning Commission recommend: is, Adoption of the resolution rezoning this site from F, farm residence district to R-11 single-dwelling residential, 2w Approval of the Beth Heights Addition preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions being satisfied before final plat approval: a Approval of final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, and street plans by the City Engineer, bm The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as wel I as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain desirable mature ,trees and steeper slopes. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with. CO Submit a signed developer's agreement with required surety for all required public improvements, dedication of necessary easements9 erosion control and tree planting to the City Engineer. d Approva.1 of a-tree removal and planting plan by the Director of Community Development before grading or construction begins, or, final plat approval is given. This plan must illustrate the trees that are to be removed, -those that are to be retained, and those that are to be replanted, e Deed restrictions shal I be filed on Lots 1-5, Block 1, "prohibiting construction of any decd:: or addition attached to the dwelling, within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline, unless the building would be protected from the radiant heat of an explosion by berm ing or other physical barrier as required by code,." PI anning Commission Minutes 5-15-89 All present tb %J % U11dings associated with the .existing dwelling shall be removed, The existing dwelling shall be removed or relocated to meet setback requirements on Lot 79 Block 21 Or if this dwel ling is to remain in its present location, the lots to the north shall be J* adjusted so a 31-foot rear-yard setback can be met from the proposed north lot line, De dicat ion Of Out Ot A and Lot 1 9 BI ocj% 1 to the City for a parking lot for Vista Hills Pc-.Arkg in lieu of park- avail i ability charges, ho The City awarding • contracts for the Sterling Street improvement project or the developer constructing sanitary sewer to the existing sanitary sewer in Linwood Avenue, i. Deeding Out lOt B to the City, Comm iss ioner Sletten seconded Ayes--A }; dahl Ayers, Barrettq Cardinal Fiola, Fischer, Larson Sigmundik Sletten D Resignation Comm issi ner Ayers moved the Planning Commission recommend acceptance of the, esic-mation of Frank Dempsey as a membe of the F1 an COmMission and approval of the resolut'on of apprec tion. Commissioner ischer S conded Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal Fiola, Fischer, Larson Sigmundik Sletten En Comp rehensi v Ian Work Session Secretary Olson disc ssed with the commissioners scheduling a d to in une for a work session to begin updating the omprehen ive plan, VIIS COMMISSION ESENTATIONS A at Counc 1 Meetings: April 6 and 10; Ma and 8 20 and 24; y Action by Co il s TO: City Manager Endorsed- FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Mo dlf :L SUBJECT: Parking Stall Size Variances Reject LOCATION: 3M Center Dat APPLICANT/OWNER: 3M Company ~ ------ ' DATE: June 2, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION its 3Misrequesting approval ofe variance for allof 3M Center to continue using parking spaces that measure 9 by 18 feet. This is 3M's standard size space which is currently being utilized. Section 36-22 (b) o+ the City Code states' that "fifty percent of ninety degree parking spaces shall be at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long and fifty percent shall be at least nine feet wide and twenty feet long, except for owner-occupied multiple dwellings. All other spacesv including ninety-degree stalls for owner-occupied multiple dwellings, shall be not less than nine feet wide and nineteen feet in length (measured parallel with the striped lines), exclusive of access aisles. If a parking space sbuts a curbv sidewalk or landscaped area, the required length of the space may be reduced by one foot." 2. The following variances, therefore, are being requested: a. One-foot parking stall width variance; b. One-foot parking stall length variance when open parking stalls would abut a curb; C. Two-foot parking stall length variance for parking ramp spaces (since .there would be no bumper overhang). REASON FOR THE-REQUEST 3M is p roposing a 500,wOQ0 squere-foot office building expansion including two parking ramps on the north side of Conway Street (see page 5.) The proposed 9- b"y 18-foot parking stalls are generating the need for the variances" The parking ramp west cz+ Building 270 (refer to Attachment Two) would be constructed first. As the applicant~s letter explains (see page W , complying with current stall size requirements would make it impossible to fit the proposed ramps within the space allotted. CRITERIA FOR THE-REQUEST Section 367.109 subdivision 6(2) of State law requires that the following findings be made before a variance to the zoning ordinance can be granted: 1~ Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration, 2' The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" aS used in connection with the granting of �� variance means the property in question cannot be put t�� a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed ' con �nex a owed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner i�» du. to circumstances unique to 'his property, not created bby ththe landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality" Economic considerations alone ey sha1l not constitute �� undue hardship if reasonable use for the 'property exists under the terms of the ordinance, ]DISCUSSION Staff concurs with the applicant's justification for smaller parking stalls since 3M~e parking facilities serve their employees and guests only. Furthermore, meeting the current parking regulations would create a hardship for the applicant since specific areas were allocated for future parking prior to the creation of the current parking code. Staff is, also, currently proposing sm parking cods amendment that would allow 3M^s proposed parking stalls" Approval of the variance would be consistent with this ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the resolution on page 7, approving a parking stall size variance for 3M Center in Maplewood for all 3M o parking facilities. Approval is based on the following findings: 1" Strict enforcement ofthe ordinance would cause undue hardship because 3M Center has been developed ina manner to fit future parking facilities within the established complex, based on Maplewood~s previous parking code that did not specify a stall size minimum. The allocated parcels of land for future parking,, there-fore, would not accommodate stalls of the currently required size. The stall lengths and widths are limited by the existing building and street locations. 2. The variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the proposed parking facilities would be for the exclusive use of 3M Center. Any potential operationael probI /ems invclving this facility.*ould involVe 3M and its employees without public involvement, 2 3. The. ordinance permits nine-foot-wide stalls for ^owner-occupied mmltiple dwelIings"" Since 3M owns and occupies 31M Center, the nine-foot-wide stalls wouldv therefore, be consistent with the intent of the ordinance. 4. 3K~s parking spaces would be consistent with the proposed parking ordinance. REFERENCE Site Description 1. Site size: The proposed expansion comprises approximately six acres. 211 Existing Land Use: 3M Buildings 260, 265 and 270 with open parking. Past Action July 51 1973: The City Council approved plans fo I r Buildings 260, 265 and 270. May 23, 1989: The Community Design Review Board approved the design plans for the proposed parking ramp west of Building 270 and recommended approval o+ the parking stall size variance. PI anninSL 1. Land Use Plan designation: DR, development and research 2. Zoning: M-1, light manufacturing mb/TE3MVAR Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Applicant's letter of justification dated May 23, 1989 4. Resolution 3 �1 ... Z a 2 1 Y � � %� -13 31 -I ND 10 A HAWTHORNE AV Arg E. RO E y N ST . � 68 � � 2 N,vM a N GERP► o G ERA 1y�� J� tJ�'OVer MAG NOL AV 4V �p o ' O cn ? eke -' 'NP .100 _/ � W cr J in Z �p CASE AV N O m AR ESTER Z AV P� Cr Cr �� } > o (�� � W W � IlL`l'1 o W BRAND ,�� EL LA AV • 32 32 acA Cr SE ENTH ST Fr E. VENTH ST Y O BUSH AV Cr _ W Cr Q MINNEHAHA m AV 5 34 �,�...o to a t �, Cl Q4) �C N MARGARET'S m E. FIFTH AV 1 25! J V 65 ` 1 10 o J PROPOSED �� W Cr w AV r L ..k U. c ••• -� 252 ( Q PARKING RAMPS _ C N WAWL 1I ca AV ERVICE DR r J J 1 i C --�:� -, 1 1 ;• rLrvi r 236` t 1 i I ' • �� I it I I L J 1 235 : <> _ II 1 1 1 J 11240 ':_ - •.,r �,. �t 216 - I. �I 1 I 1 �225�i r22T �' `! 2431 23 1 1 ��Ir �I�� - -,� �_J � i r11 i 1 i ' 01 i 1 _ _; --- I '- J '� i I Ii��l 112241 - ' j -' i r Tonners .�,..,� 220 222 ` - - -i I i i Loke vo s � 12 0 T.28N %R.22W. y, 9 35 +36 c�r� o N 2 i 1 •• R O KVi� N Z Cr MAYER LA JAMES DR ai ? Q r-- Q J H W �W Q Q U 2 Z c S C 2 Cr } UPPER AFTON RD c~n o 2 oW 1 � _ r LOCATION MAP a Attachment 1 4 N MY 0 1 � .• /, , j' , / } C i oe klw 270. tk... ale • � • .�{{r�,�.�ll' ! � il(e a •mow {� � 1 \ '• 4 � ��K,.t -j�: ' a,fs�� t�'� Y�:IC�ra tL i�.r:f il-4 f ,7 ..�j •� "��? � r� � er , -•� \yA , •', r r'. 6 , ..,. 'j' ..pt:! ,�;. i`�� .'�1. 'fit••+ f =..t�" 'k ".i 3 _k..[ -.. . i i •: 4 (V �. i ••S "7Mr! 1 � !:.. r - ,�.b� ( . v.,; '• � , r� � ., ' V 14 - E••Y'' rf t.� J . �:.� a..� ��j,�• r � �� � � _ .: i' � •yA., r t a .[:y�..� as'!'t'.°i•...'� •i ',,i•�T�r'��'i;S i'E Ia i. i �f,� 1/.y., ��n�a� {•. �,�� a + =_ \ � -V ,• .• •i j ` . ; .i -• ha h, ifA•+F!`, ,3, Et `_ � fir! Nom• f^+- r'� 4 L ,�. �' ,� _ max ,. ;� {,,�{, s''f.-�t{(� ,.� •c � "v t!, f NEW SURF Act tar ��.�� (L 'iw . •� '� ,� .`,r•Y '�•-.,v t.'.n �" y1-•..7. �.t.+•., ^ yr �.- .1,► J}.r +, �t�. 1 "`;;jam i � �. i� ' .. 4 . f ` (.,, , / � \ - "'+a• i •� . , ti � tX�:"!': t�1 - ,�� •�"��� K �. • w►. •f {. 3� oY, •1� . • ♦ ,Lar At..: 8 , iXISTI4G SVRFA toy 1! 32 O1SITpR LOT t2 :1 I r ri / / ` �>' fill w EXISTING SURFACE Lq1 303 • t 4 +' CONWAY AVENUE j SITE PLAN 5 Attachment 2 3M Facilities Engineering and Real Estate PO Box 33331 St. Paul, Minnesota 55133 -3331 612/778 5049 NAY 23, 198 3M Mr. Thomas Ekstrand Dept. of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 MAY 2 s 1989 Re: Variance Application - Off-Street Parking Stall Dimensions - 3M Center Dear Mr. Ekstrand: The 3M Company formally wishes to request a variance from the Maplewood Zoning Ordinance for Off- Street Parking facilities at the 3M Center. For many years 3M has adopted a minimum off - street 90 degree parking module of 9 feet by 60 feet. This provides for uniform 9 foot wide stalls and 24 foot wide aisles. This basic dimension also complies with the recommendations of both the Institute of Transportation Engineers and National Parking Association concerning parking facilities at employment centers. Copies of these recommendations can be made available at your request. Strict enforcement of the current Maplewood Zoning Ordinance will severly effect the ability and /or desire of 3M to expand at 3M .. Center for the following reasons: 1. Several parcels of ground have been reserved for future off-street parking development using the basic 9 foot by 60 foot parking module. For example, the parcel of land reserved for the proposed Building 271 Parking Garage will not accommodate the larger stall size requirements contained in the current zoning ordinance. This land was reserved specifically to accommodate the 3M minimum parking module size previously used and approved by the City of Maplewood at 3M Center, 2. Considering the large amount of future off-street parking planned at 3M Center, the larger parking dimension required by the zoning ordinance would significantly increase the amount of land required for parking (approximately 18 %). This would reduce the amount of land available for green space and increase storm water run off. Both of these .factors would have an adverse affect on the future development of 3M Center. 6 Attachment 3 Mr. Thomas Ekstrand Page 2 3. The use of different stall sizes ( new vs old) would make it vary difficult for 3M to designate which employees and /or cars should use the larger or smaller spaces. Many employers have reported considerable difficulty in enforcement with designation of specific spaces without the payment of fees and /or extensive supervision. Over 8,000 off- street parking spaces are currently provided at 3M Center using the uniform 9 foot by 60 foot minimum module and to our knowledge there has never been employee complaints concerning parking stall sizes at 3M Center. 3M, sincerely feels that the variance, if granted, is in conformance with the spirit and intent of the Maplewood Zoning Ordinance as follows: 1. The ordinance does permit 9 foot wide stalls for "owner occupied multiple dwellings ". In this sense 3M owns and occupies 3M Center. The 9 foot wide stall, therefore, would be in compliance with ordinance requirements. 2. 3M. also awns and maintains the private roads stem serving the off - street parking facilities at 3M Center. Any potential operational problems involving this facility would involve 3M. and its employees without public involvement. Don't hesitate to contact me if I can furnish you with additional information or appear in response to any questions concerning this request. Your very truly, r, NI Robert D. Owens, P.E. Senior Traffic Engineering Special ist /3M 1 OWN, 7 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a l Maplewood City Council was duly called and held in the meeting of the chambers in said City on the de f e counc�l y u� v 1�89 at 7 p.m* The following members were present: The f011owing members were absent: WHEREAS v3M Compan�pli�f�a�riancef�th�foll�i described property: ' owing- described 1&��AC STS ACCRUING EX PT SELY & FOL; L 1 B 1 CARLTON PK LS 3-12 ELLEN GROVE EX OUTLO2SB&BE& //3 OF HWY 168^84 OF L8 FT 1,15 & 16 B5; ALL OF TANNERS LAKE OF W 188.84 FT; PT W OF OF S QFXWS1/90OFTE[]F/E �2 OF58WC1/4HOFWNE/1/4p&NEX1N4785EFT OF ��ARLTON S7 OF NW 1/4 NW 1/4; THE STA & EX PT SLY OF 1F4 HWy &3E4 94; '` THE '' SW » THE 1/4 1/8 u E / �� X NSP CO SUB TN |9 RN 22, (GUBJ TO EGMTS , HW-S) IN SEC 36 This propp_r-ty is also known as 3M Center, Maplewood; WHEREASv Section 36-22 of. the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that parking spaces be at least ten feet wide by 20 feet deep, except that half of the total number of spaces may be nine feet wide: WHEREAS v the applicant is proposing stal1s that are 18 feet d eep by nine feet wide, requiring s variance of one foot of stall width and WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as +01 1 ows: I'm This variance was applied for on May 23,1989. Review This variance �s �«i�� by the Maplewood Community Design �w Board on May 23 1989 Thm, Board ' - _ , . oa recommended to the City Council that said variance be - - `~ ^ 3" The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 2 1989 to consider thi�a variance. Notice thereof was published and ' mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing o ��n opportunity to be heard and present written statements. r n�.�ere given also considered reports and recommendations �f the City staff Council Planning Commission, �` � ano t� NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that �ied�xbove-dsscribed variance be approved on the basis of the following n ings of fact: I. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship because 3M Center has been developed in a manner to fit future parking facilities within the established complex, based on Maplewood^s 8 Attachment 4 previous park ing code that did not spec if y a stal 1 size • min imum . The.. al located parcels of I and for f uture park ing therefore woLtl d not accommodate stalls of the currently required size, The stall lengths and widths are limited by the existing building and steet 10cati ores ., 2a The variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the proposed parl,- ing +ac i I it ies would be f or the exclusive use of 3PI Center. Any Potential operational problems involving this facility would involve 3M and its employees without publ is invol vement 30 The ordinance permits nine-foot-wide stalls .for "owner- occupied multiple dwellings." Since 3M owns and occupies 3M n Cente, the nie-foot-wide stalls Would, therefore r q be consistent with the intent of the ordinance. 4a 3M-s parking spaces Would be consistent with the proposed parking ordinance, Adopted this day of 9 19898 Seconded by STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY ssm CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Ayes-- the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk. of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of same 19eq, with the original on file in MY office, and the Is a full true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this variance, this Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City day of 1 19898 City Cl erk City Of Maplewood