The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989 05-18 & 05-22 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 4:3O P.M., Thursday, May 18, 1989 and 7:00 P.M., Monday, May 22, 1989 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 89 -12, A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 89 -1 (January 9, 1989) - D. APPROVAL= _oE_.'AGENDA E. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims 2. Clean -up of Demolished Business 3. Registered Land Survey: 2090 County Road D (Hawse) 4. Conditional use Permit Renewal: Rolling Hills Second Addition 5. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 1225 Frost Avenue (Hirsch) F. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Individual.Pressure Reducing Valves, Project 89 -09 G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Final Approval of Bonds, Notes and Developer's Agreement (Cottages of Maple- wood) 2. Hillcrest Sanitary Sewer, Project 86 -22 - Revise Assessment Roll — 3-0- --W -alter Street, Project 84 -14 - Review Assessment Roll 4. Planning Commission Survey S. Pay Equity /Comp. Worth H. NEW BUSINESS 1. 1988 Annual Financial Report and Audit 2. Community Survey 3. Request to Hire Public Works Administrative Assistant 4. Stop Sign: Brooks and Barclay 5. Keller Parkway - County Road C Water Main Project 88 -10: Approval of Plans 6. Brooks Avenue Water Main, Project 88 -08: Approval of Plans 7. Code Amendment: RE District (1st Reading) . Code'Amen.dment. Noise Ordinance: 2nd Reading 9. Business Clean -Up 10. Comprehensive Plan Work Session 11. Ledman Vs. City of Maplewood, et al 12. Recreational Vehicle Permit Revocation 13. CSO /Paramedic- Change from Part -time to Full -time I. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2, 3, 4. 5. 6. 7, 8, 9. 10. J. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Code Review: R -3 District K. ADJOURNMENT OF 5 -18 -89 MEETING L. RECONVENE: CALL 5 -22 -89 MEETING TO ORDER M. ROLL CALL N -A APPOINTMENTS 1. HR:C 2. HR C Annual Report N. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit Termination: 1564 Grandview Avenue (Suby) 2. 7 :10 P.M., Southwinds of Maplewood a. Conditional Use Permit for a PUD b. Revision of the Fred Moore PUD C. Preliminary Plat d. Authorization for Letter to St. Paul 0, VISITOR PRESENTATIONS P. ADJOURNMENT OF 5 -29 -89 MEETING. MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, January 09, 1989 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 89 - 1 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:02 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Legislative Meeting 2. City Hall 3. Sand at Intersection 4. Traffic Control: County Road D and White Bear Avenue 5. Recycling Center Containers 6. Consent Agenda 7. Letter from Resident: English and Cope 8. Remove E -4 9. Remove I -1 10. Add I -4 -j. Appointments Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. E -A APPOINTMENTS 1. Housing Redevelopment Authority (HRA) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to table the _appointment to the HRA until it is readvertised. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 2. Community Design Review Board a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 1/9 b. The applicants, Michael Holden and Daniel T. Molin, appeared before the Council. c. Councilmember Anderson moved to appoint Michael Holden and Daniel T. Molin to the Community Design Review Board. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims a. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the claims as submitted: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 444,634.92 Checks #8555 - #8620 Dated 12 -16 -88 thru 12 -30 -88 $ 145,709.24 Checks #5045 - #5158 Dated 01 -09 -89 $ 590,344.16 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 165,747.96 Payroll Checks $ 32,957.25 Payroll Deductions $ 198,705.21 Total Payroll $ 789,049.37 GRAND TOTAL Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. Budget Change.- Finance Department Councilmember Bastian moved to approve a 1988 budget transfer of $2,700 from the Contingency Account to the Finance Department budget to finance wage and benefit costs. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 3. Final Plat: Chesterwood Two 2nd Addition Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Chesterwood Two Second Addition final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. - 2 - 1/9 4. Final Approval of Bonds: Cottages of Maplewood Removed from Agenda 5. Time Extension: Cottages of Maplewood PUD Councilmember Bastian _moved to approve a six -month time ext Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 6. CUP Renewal: 1779 McMenemy Street (Mn. Dot Storage Building) Councilmember Bastian one vear for a metal Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 7. CUP Renewal: 1904 Maryknoll Avenue (Apman) Councilmember Juker moved to approve a one year extension for the permit to operate a beautv shon as n hnme nrrnnntinn ar 1004 Mar,, Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 8. CUP Renewal: Woodlynn Avenue and Ariel Street (Salvation Army Church) Mayor Greavu moved to approve the renewal of the conditional use permit for vear for the Salvation Armv Ch„rrh and adnlr day rnro 4414r.. �� ♦ U Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 9. Park Acquisition Charge for Neighborhood Parks t f Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution 88 - 1 - 1 WHEREAS, Maplewood Code Section 21 -46 recognizes the need for neigh- borhood parks, establishes standards and improvement guidelines for such and provides methods of acquisition and development, and WHEREAS, Sec. 21 -56 (a) states that the City Council at its first regular meeting of each calendar year shall act to adopt by resolution the average acre acquisition cost and the average acre development cost for neighborhood parks throughout the City, and WHEREAS, the intention of the Ordinance is to provide for future quality of life through the acquisition and development of park -open space, and - 3 - 1/9 WHEREAS, the costs of acquisition of property and the development of parks has continued to increase, THEREFORE, the Park and Recreation Commission recommends that effective January 9, 1989, the City Council establish the average acre acquisition cost at $4,200, and continues the development cost at $7,500 per acre, with the City financing 50% of the development costs. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. 10. 1989 Pay Rates for Temporary and Part —Time Employees (Non Union) a. Councilmember Anderson moved that the pay rate for Janitor be $6.00 per hour. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Councilmember Bastian moved to amend the motion to allow a maximum pay rate of $6.00, but not pay more than $4.95 per hour. Motion failed for lack of a second. Voting on original motion. Motion failed. Councilmember Bastian Seconded by Mayor Greavu. 11. Budget Transfer: Utility System a. Mayor Greavu moved to vi Ayes — Councilmembers Anderson and Rossbach Nays — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Juker and Bastian. ates a is Ayes — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian and Rossbach Nays — Councilmembers Anderson and Juker. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes — all. 12. Authorize Replacement of An Associate Planner Mayor Greavu moved to approve from hire an — 4 — 1/9 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian and Rossbach Nays - Councilmembers Anderson and Juker. 13. Authorization to Fill Full -Time Position - Motor Vehicle Clerk Councilmember Rossbach vacanc Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:10 P.M., Home Occupation License: 1725 E. Laurie Road (Catlin) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Kevin and Josette Catlin, 1725 Laurie Road, for a home occupa- tion license to operate a taxi cab leasing business as a home occupation. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. e. Kevin Catlin, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. f. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Paul Krenz, 1712 Laurie Road Betty Krenz, 1712 Laurie Road Edward Romon;_ 1713 Laurie Road Dick Weinhandl, 1709 Sandhurst Ellis Swanson, 1741 Laurie Road Geraldine Swanson, 1741 Laurie Road h. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. i. Mayor Greavu moved to approve a home occupation license for three (3 months to operate a taxi -cab leasing business at 1725 Laurie Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. The license numbers on the cabs shall be filed with the City. 2. There shall be no repair or storage of cabs, except for one cab driven by Mr. Catlin. Cabs shall only be allowed to come to the site to drop off receipts. 3. Car radios shall not be heard at the property line. - 5 - 1/9 4. There shall be no more than ten leased cabs each week vising the site. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Colored Land Use and Zoning Maps Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian and Rossbach Nays - Councilmembers Anderson and Juker. a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to table Item H -1 indefinitely. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Code Amendment: Abandoned or Junk Cars (2nd Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item and refer same back to Staff for a list of what type and where the problems exist. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Maplewood Fire Fighters' Relief Association: Increase of Benefits Removed from Agenda. 2. Approval of Consultants - Ramsey County Feasibility Studies a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to accept the consultants as requ Ramsey County and budgets be established to commit to funding for share of the feasibility study costs as follows: County Road C $8000.00 Roselawn Avenue 8180.00 County Road B 800.00 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. - 6 - 1/9 3. Mrs. Masloski - 1915 DeSoto a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report and presented a letter from Mrs. Masloski where she is requesting that the City buy a portion of her land before the Roselawn- Edgerton storm sewer project is accepted. b. No action taken. 4. Annual Designations and Appointments a. City Attorney(s) Councilmember Juker moved to reappoint the Law Firm of Bannigan and Kelly to represent the City of Maplewood for 1989 at the recommended 1989 Rates. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. b. Prosecuting Attorney Councilmember Juker moved to re- appoint Martin Costello Prosecuting Attorney for 1989 and as recommended, his retainer fee be $4,000 per month. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. c. Municipal Legislative Commission Councilmember Juker moved to appoint Councilmember Gary Bastian to the Municipal Legislative Commission. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. d. Ramsey County League of Local Governments Councilmember Anderson moved to appoint Councilmember George Rossbach to the Ramsey County League of Local Government. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. e. Cable Commission Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, and Juker. Councilmember Rossbach abstained. Councilmember Bastian moved to appoint Councilmember Norm Anderson and Ann Fitch to the Commission. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. f. N.E.S.T. Councilmember Bastian moved to appoint Councilmembers Anderson and Rossbach to the N.E.S.T. Commission. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. - 7 - 1/9 g. Suburban Rate Authority Councilmember Bastian m Seconded by Mayor Greavu. h. East Community Family Center Councilmember Bastian moved of Public Safetv Ken C:nllins Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. i. East Metro Development Group Councilmember Bastian moved to Ayes — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Rossbach Nay — Councilmember Juker Ayes — all. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes — all. j. Official Newspaper Councilmember Bastian moved to designate the MAPLEWOOD REVIEW as the official newspaper of the City. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Rossbach. Nay — Councilmember Juker k. Acting Mayor Mayor Greavu moved to appoint Councilmember Juker Acting Mayor. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Rossbach. Nay — Councilmember Juker. 1. Maplewood —North St. Paul — Oakdale Chamber of Commerce. Councilmember Juker alternate to the Ma McGuire Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. m. St. Paul Water Treatment Plant Advisory Board Mayor Greavu moved to appoint Councilmembers Anderson and Bastian to the St. Paul Water Treatment Plant Advisory Board. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes — all. — 8 — 1/9 n. Ramsey County Light Rail Transit Committee Councilmember Bastian moved to annoint Con m Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. 5. Commissions and Boards a. Planning Commission 1. Councilmember Anderson moved to appoint the following to the Planning Commission: Frank Dempsey Sue Fiola Dennis Larson Mike Ayers for three (3) year terms. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes — all. b. Community Design Review Board 1. Councilmember Rossbach moved to annoint Mary Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. c. Park and Recreation Commission 1. Councilmember Bastian moved to reappoint Bonn Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes — all. 2. Councilmember Bastian moved to authorize Staff to advertise for open- ings on the Commissions and Boards. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes — all. 6. Rules of Procedures Mayor Greavu moved to table to the next meeting January 23 1989 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. 7. Planning Commission Chairman Councilmember Bastian moved that Les Axdahl be appointed Planning Commission Chairman. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes — all. — 9 — 1/9 J. VISITOR PRESENTATION None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Legislature Meeting a. Councilmember Bastian stated AMM has started their 1989 Contact System and suggests that the Council meet with our local legislature. On February 4, 5 and 11, the AMM is having legislative meetings and recommended our legislators be invited to attend along with the City Council. 2. City hall. No action taken. 3. Sand at Intersections a. Councilmember Anderson questioned why some intersections are not sanded. b. Staff stated that all of the City is sanded. 4. Traffic Control at County Road D and White Bear Avenue a. Councilmember Anderson commented that the City should become involed in the problems at the intersection of County Road D and White Bear Avenue. b. Staff stated they will contact Ramsey County. c. Councilmember Juker moved to refer the report on several areas of traffic problem a to Staff for an informal lators of these problems. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 5. Recycling Center Containers. a. Councilmember Anderson stated he put his recyclable products in paper bags on the edge of his property and they picked up the products but left the bags, and it created a mess. Couldn't containers be available. b. Staff will investigate. 6. Consent Agenda a. Mayor Greavu commented that perhaps on Thursday nights and have an open meeting to discuss the Consent Agenda. b. No action taken. 7. Letter Re: English and Cope a.Councilmember Juker has received a letter regarding the development at English and Cope. It requested the entrance into the proposed shopping center be changed. - 10 - 1/9 b. No action taken. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION None. M. ADJOURNMENT 8:50 P.M. City Clerk - 11 - 1/9 AGENDA REPORT T0: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: May 15, 1989 Agenda Number E -1 Action by Council: Endorsed Rejecter P. Date It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 465,256.41 Checks #722200 - #541400 Dated 04 -28 -89 thru 05 -12 -89 $ 921581.48 Checks #10200 - #970700 Dated 05 -18 -89 $ 557,838.00 Total per attached voucher /check register $ 172,353.32 $ 33,839.15 $ 206,193.08 $ 764,031.08 Payroll Checks Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. DFF : kaz V 0 U CH R L G CITY OF' MA"PILEWOOD P A Ci E I 1. L 0 U E, I t IL E. 9 • 4 05 VOUCHER/, 1\1 D 0 R CHECK v E NUMBER N U r1ri BlE R 6384 7 e2. 9;. 4*. 1-i V"., c: K** V E 1\4 1) 0 R DATE N AM E 04 8 9 PUI:-',L. IC EMf-`L.OYEE 6385 931450 0 4 9 WALLY MC CARTHYS PON-rIAC A M G U N "r 190400 04 Zc-'9 -P-f OF NATURAL RE"'ClU fi. 6387 541400 0 4 2 8 8 9 MINN. STATE TREASURER 6 .=''-8 _414 0 04/Z"18/89 MINN. STATE TREAE'URIER 9 51 10 ".10 0 .5 0 1 E;9 )CU STATE. BANK M A f E. W C. 1) .10 54!400 0 5 / 0 1 / 8 9 MINN. S TATE rREASLJRl':_'R F . I . C. A. PAYABLE v 4 4- 1 FED INC TAJ.; PAY 6391 �14l 400* 0 b / 0 1 / MINN. STATE TR E Ar:, U R`VF�' 6:392 690205 05/01/89 T OLD LOG THEAIRE 0c.93 2 4 0 2'5 Ob 0 1 8 9 EMPI. 0YEE BENEFIT PLANS 672.00 672-00 DEF, W/ FAY AGTS 21000.00 '9 4 t, 0 1 0 1 /-3 9 E Q M M I R tl N - STA C, N E 6395 943bOO 05/01/89 WI$CONSIN DLP*'r. OF RLVENUE 6396 5101400 05/01/89 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK HCMA DED PAY I-1010.00 6:Z-1 97 0 8 () ZI 0 0 0`_: /01 EDLUE CROSO B-LUE SH*r,- %J L D 004 HEALTH LIFE DEN INS 87305.79 6'.:L '9 8 2 ob 0 0 0 5 0 1 /18 51 13ROUP HE'AL TH I NC. HCMA TEED PAY 110701.06 HEALTH LIFE DEN._-I.NS. 0 6399 810100 05/t.11/c.9 SHARE 3 7 0 .8 1 L.T.D. INS 1,0,9 9147) .1, 1-, 1 99Q_. 93 6400 51 01 1. 0 0 b/ 0 1 ED 9 MADISON iii AI'IONAL LIFE 6401 541400 o '0 /0Z/-3.9 MINN. �•ATE TREASURER 6 4 0 541400 - - 0 b / 0 4'/ 8'.-Y MI N1`4 - S TA -r F:. TR E A S U R FZ 4 C):.:- 0/` 541 4 0 05 !:! : / 8- 9 tyl I NN . 'TA E r R E A'US U F' R 404 r: + 541400 Ob/03/89 MI NN S T Al" E T R k':'A S Li RE R' T E M H, E C K D E'S C R I PT 10N A M G U N "r AMOUNT PEF,A DED PAY 9 t) 8 0 PERA ccji\vrKj,.Bu"r ION 211 3 T 8 9 REFSAIR 33, MAIN-f/V 234 78 234 .78 D N R L I C IFE I,-*- c- I- I.J - 417.00 417..00 M -0 TF-1 R V E H L I C F E E S 1 1 7 toi., b 1 111566-.51 cST A 1)h I V L I C F"E E S 5 526.50 F . I . C. A. PAYABLE v 4 4- 1 FED INC TAJ.; PAY 19, 151 45 FICA i�:ONTRIB.UT IONS 79441 .83 34,635.11 110 TO 0 Flc-�_ E S 17 il- 55 .7 5 17 5 5 .7 5 r I S "T A T l: D R.' L "v L I C. F E f::._;:1. 95 ..UU 45�b 0 0 FEES FOR SEERIVICE 672.00 672-00 DEF, W/ FAY AGTS 21000.00 &-9000.00 F A T E I N C'_ T A P. A'Y 7,8 8 5 55 7 8-85. 55- rJTATE IN\'-,' TAX PAY 101.24 101.24 WAGE DEDUCTIONS 3:37 t7l 0 337.50 HEALTH i_iFE D-E U 1 US 6 C) HCMA DED PAY I-1010.00 A/R INS CONT 463.14 81769.44 FICMA LIED PAY 004 HEALTH LIFE DEN INS 87305.79 A/R IN U N T 4 0 - 4 .45 10 15%.04 HCMA TEED PAY 110701.06 HEALTH LIFE DEN._-I.NS. 353,-•46. A/R IN%S CONT 6131 5 . 4:19 3 7 0 .8 1 L.T.D. INS 1,0,9 9147) .1, 1-, 1 99Q_. 93 MI.3T►R VEH LIC. FEES 14,316.7-3 14,316.73 STATE DRIV LI(*.` FEE 6 0 6j, 0 0 606.00 MOTOR I-10 F*E'l__Sj 9 54'".,34 9 b 4 21 3 4 S ► ATE D R I V L I C F'EE S 09 9 5 o 6 99 51 0 V OUC•HREG CITY 01. 1'lA"PL.i_.W00D 1" AGE +a!::�/ 1 <<..�'r 1:':44 V0U"llE::h /(1•Hh'.C:r; }tE JIQ_EEFt {w {w +R P E AR 1:0D 055 VUUCHE::R/ CHECK VENDOR' C: HE" C:K VEN!D0R I T*.E:M CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT � 6405 1510600 Ott /0 3/89 C:OiYlME�RC:IAL. LIFE INS. CO. LIFE: INS PAY 93.10 FIC:MA DED PAY 3':'6.80 I HEALTH LIFE DEN INS _ _ -_ _ 02j .. 44. .. _....... _ _ _ .. INS CONT 1::.43 1 , 034 r77 64015 140400 05/04/8'1 CLERK OF DI;:;'T1= %IC:T C:i1Ui-:i' C:NiY DRIVERS' L.lC.. 1.10.'.:`0 11G.51j 6407 615"030 O5/04/89 NIC:KELDYS RESTAURANT PROGRAMS PARKS 116.95 11 5 � i E F 41 : 5 Ott/04/89 Y C NIA E ; ; : x A CE 1. L U L A Fr '1 EL k. PH ONE: 15 . f . 7 _ � r.:i4Q.•� f.., .. 0.:'04Q0 .... r i't 1... 05I04��.,9 .. .», t�1 ..` ._ 1 ANDERSON, �.:d�li�fLE... _., 1 .. ..� c s -t ..i s !" Cs r'-['Z1.�G,RiAl'{. SUi't-L1c' - :', 1. •._, I..s 1 i ...jtom. _ SUPPLIES E Q U I [_1 . 4.23 TRAVEL. TRAINING 4.00 � SUPPLIE-3 JANITORIAL_. 3 79.... TRAVEL. T R A I N I iii to Z.75 TRAVEL. TRAINING :5.50 i i:l U r' !-' L 1. E i., U i- F I C Er r 6'. 4 _ SUPPLIES VEHICLE: :: +.47 TRAVEL RAININU .75 48.51 i 6410 541 400 05/04/89 MINN. STATE TR AUUREE R UTA "f E:. I)E i VEr.w1 l..I C:. 417.50 417.50 ►„141 1 5141400 05/04/89 MINN. ;",`ATE TREASl!RE.R MOTOR VEH L_ IC., _ ..:.. 111-647 � _.1.31✓ 6412 54Z340 05/05/89 M1 NNE:S0 f"A NA i E.. ASSOC. Of" TRAVEL TRAINING- NING 50.00 50.00 i -6413 551700 05/05/89 MN REC . BARK ASSOCIATION REGISTRATIONS Z14-14.00 ice. � 47 `I' . 00 ri»'i 414 55 1300 {� 5 / {„ 1 5 / i�, ': r MN !-f /�i E'4 !'�:. U E-' E: r; V 1� S �_! 1"; ;':� A � -� t_, �� i Cr >JS . IRAVE::L TRAL1111NCB . �: � t 4b.CU .�. 6415 190400 05 /Ofj/ 89 DEi=J' . OF NATURAL REEOUR of S i)NR L I C:EN'' l 435.00 6416- 152b00 05 / 0 J / 9 CORPORATE RISK MANAGE.RS , INC.. C.0NTRA T PYti r 194-95.00 1 , 4 1 _, {- 41 7 541400 _ 5 / , / - 1 0'--;' . • M I N N . STATE f R E A S E "1 1=_.h . ` (A T L DRIVERS' LICENSE 5') " �►_ 1 5 06 41 I' 541400 Ob /05 /89 MINN. STATE TREASURER' MOTOR Vil"H 1.1C 10,066.00 r= . 0 0 � 6419 M 1 t,1 1 {�� L i, .8' 1f { 1 / c i / 1� 1 -r NORTHERN f' A f' k± r- i t N S POWER , t . �_� i i 1 U •f� I L 1 :�I.�1 E CO D k1 _1 _i .t _� .. UTIL 1��.:r 07.'TLfZLING 3r9Cl, � U -['I L 1600 r{I Y f=t T L E Z1.9 UT IL I.�0() 7TH : 'T . .75 UTIL 1 39 L A R P E N 71.04 � U 'T I L :�...:.�.. �.. �.. �� N H I; L A F: _ 73,64 U f• I{' L 1 t E D t- E !" l O N 1_� 9 .0 r�s / U TI L ._I 4� � C. L 14 •� Ll R .Y rat ! r 1 tE1 U 1 1 L 1 ti01 'GIE'Nl1j)A 13. ._i 0 U ..t. I L �� 1. �, f A E E E: L. L 6.66 tJ T I f_ ` 4 t�� 1 74J-1 :; °f » � . U..[..I L 1 9,4O N T NAUl.. 67.67 _ _ VOUC•HREG i:I•i "'Y OF MAPLrrW 0D PAGE _, c�5/ 1, / _':j 1:.44 VuLlt_:i•-lLR /CHE C.jl< REGISTER V0UC:HEEir C.: H E �: i��:: VENDOR �` �: N E: C. F VENDOR I TF: M ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT a UTIL 618 FARREL.L 15.33 UTIL 257ti ST I L L W A TEER 9 UTIL 10:795 L AKE:WOOD 2`0`:1.73 31 89.09 • 6' t 54140" 05/08/89 MILAN. STATE TREASURER � 1 - STA TIE V _IC FEES .. .50 7 -r2 3.50 6421 541 400 05/08/89 MINN. STA'TE. TREASURER MOTOR VE:fl L IC: FEE S 91 361.48 91:61.48 6422 5:31 650 05/09/89 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM I S23)N SEWAGE Tf- %EATMENT 1142-1439.14 11 Zr.s 439 .14 6421:3 541400 05/09/89 MINN. STATE: TRE::AStJRE:R M010 R VEH11 LIt FEES 1313141.48 13,341.48 6424 541400 05/09/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LTC: FEES 738.50 738.50 642:5 110.350 05/09/89 CANTERBURY DOWNS FEES FOR 8 E F V I C E : 8Z. f f .'- , 0 0 64;6 5500ti -*5 05/09/89 MN AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. TRAVEL TRAIN 10.00 10.00 6427 0:30910 05/09/89 ARCrO TRAVEL a: TRAIN 105.00 105.00 64 *0 091440 05/09 /89 BROWN AND C R I , INC. AWART)ED CONS l C:•TR 1:: :, 804 .29 12 :..,1.8'04. -Z,,-4 64'29 850600 05/ 10/89 SUPE� RAMER ICA LlPPLI ES3 E:f�U EF'MLN_f 30.36 FUEL n OIL _._ 6430 81002:5 05/10/89 SHAKOPE.E. HOUSE FEES FOR SERVICE 352.50 352.50 r 43' 1 150900 05 / 1 0/89 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION F f i lr f L -aJ E 1 Y 1 i E u '; 5 8.Z5 6-4 =-�2: 701 5rl-st� tj�i / 1 � /�'r� .._. SAMUNA I RE: S TAURAN r' FEES . FOR -SE RV I C; E__ _ . . - _ -852.3z 64=33 520060 05/10/89 MC: CORMACK, C:ONNY B. TRAVEL & TRAIN :150.00 SUBS & ME:ML,E:.RS 80.00 230. 00 64 4 541400 05/10/89 MINN. W TA TE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L IC � •%_ES 91976.80 9 1 978 .80 6435 541400 05/10/89 MINN. STATE: TREASURER STATE. DRIV LICr FEES 565.00 565.00 64:36 140400 05/11/89 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT FILING FEE 12.00 64:7 40 0 00 05/11/89e J.L. S.IH I E,LY CO. `- M,!tI)'dl- E�f�iAN�..E MATERIAL 39048.03 MAINIE NANCE. MA TE RIAL - .40..18- _ ....- .3_1 0 5 1; 6,438 .541400 05/12/89 MINN. STATE. TREASURER MOTOR VEH 1. IC FEES ' =�, 6 10.00 91610.00 r, 4 541400 0 /1._, : MINN. STATE TREASUR�R z TATr DRI V�R;� LIC. 3}0.50 `0.5064,, 72-6 0 01 0o 05/1.8 A.E.C. E.tYGINEEt "(S REPAIR MAIlitT 55.00 55 7'2'. 6 1 t x 104-15) 0 f? 5 / 1 A E, h I �' E N 3 i •c B EIR T A P R .. E'S 9.00 9.00 *vI )U01 E -G C C I T Y O OF MAPLE WOOD F F'AGE.. 4 , �:5t 1:: 1 ��`r1 1'M p p 44 V VUUC:!-1ERf�:t - -tEG�: Ri >`iI� Ti. E' 0 R P PERIOD 0 J VOUCHER/ GHEC:F-; V VENDOR C CHEC V VENDOR I I Tt:M 1 1,rE M C C:HECi:: NUMBER N NUMBER i i AT E N NAME 1.i E' t:k IF'T ICBM A AMOUNT A AMOUNT i 72..62 0 010499 0 05/18/89 A AL- AC• I , I NC . ; ;JLlPPL.I E.S OF E• I±.rE 1 10.00 1 10.00 11 1 7 :r,3 0 010575 � � 5/ 1 �.:��_f 89 A AGE. HARDWARE _ _ _. 1D:�.�� MAINT MATERIAL 5 5;3 . .1 MjAitsNT j 10x7,.%15 jM/�AT +ERIAnL 1 40. 1 V MAINT MATERIAL . � 4 M � 58.00 � � MAINT MA FER.I.AL_ _ .. _ _ _ 75.2 9 _. _ - _ _ .4-7 1 .3-15 72164 0 021200 0 05/18/89e A AMERICAN FASTENER ' 'SUPHL.IES VEF-I LL 9 98 4 42 r rr, •; 7'Z65 o ozizio 0 05/18/89 A AMERICAN FLAGPOLE S SUPPLIES JANITOR 2 26.00 2 25.00 I 7" 1 1.cl�.f�' A AMk�F 1CAIU TC.j +,�LUF'FL.IE F F�A_E _._ __ ._ _ _ _... _ �:.0 72167 0 040700 0 05/18/89 A ARDEN SHOREVIEW HOSPITAL C CAN I ICE CARE � �7:� .75 � � 7.3 .75 I 7 � E 0 0 05/18/89 SERVICE 1 1 , 0 10.4 6 7 REPAIR MAINT 2 2.69. 13 1 11279.59 ' 7..:69 0 041000 0 05/18/89 A ARNOLD, DAVID U UNIFORMS & CLOTH 5 59.64 5 59.64 7 7 .� C Ca :t;:�ijt� � �.�L ► /1�_:' ;� A AnT, IGN � �, �i" t= I..1E'S �� ,� iGE z zu_..85 SUPPLIES OFF I C:E 3 34 . ZD 1 13. 3: 5 7271 0 06.1 000 0 05/1$/89 B BAN1 CK, JOHN S SUFlPL.I ES E.QlllPME..1!1T 7272 0 061 100 0 05/ 1 +_ /8 9 B BANN IUAN & KELLY P.A. M M E:_E:.S FOR SERVICE 2 2, 9w4 .40 I I LEG ? L `:' F= I t: A L 1 16 ...;::. _ _. :. , r 4 D. 5. 7273 0 061750 0 0 f 18f89 B BATE.MAIii, STANLEY P PROGRAM kEG FEES 3 38.00 3 38.00 I 7 74 0 061900 0 05 1E3/89 B BATTERY TIRE WAREHOU ;E S SUPPLIES VEHICLE 1 1 3,23, .6 6 ,rUPF'LIE_S VEHICLE b b.9,_a 1 159.6 7275 0 070'2`_*00 0 05 /18/89 B BBC KER, RONALD T TRAVEL TRAINING 1 17.53 1 17.5 7.276 0 080300 O Ob/ 18/89 B BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY F FEES FOR SE.KU I C,E . _ _ _ _ 119,._;::_x..._......._. __ . . _... _ . _...._ .. 1.1. ,.24. 7 7'7 t tjGCy::; � S S� /i�� /��;`� i i�I__At�t:: `('I�iP�1E, U IL T TRAVEL TRAINING ; ;34.�:�ci VEHICLL. ALLi.JWAIU%�E:: , ,.�U.s 1 114.Siza 727' 8 0 080900 0 05/18/89 B BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS 1 1.1 F'IL 11;'30 ti 'F Y B 5 56.76 UTIjL 1 1J0:: C:TYj E•'. _ _ . _ _ Z4.. 0-0 UTIL_ �_.3 a:7 f'� RL1N6 6 6.48 amt .K VisUC:HPZEG • •:i.i'Y oi- MAPLE:WOOD P PAGE 0 5 120 8 9 1 1 f M V V0L!(1 :i- 1�::F' CH E E:.i:: K REG I C:.t ; ; ft FOR F F:. E R I: O D 05 VOUCHER/ CHECK V VEND11:iR C CHECK V VENDOR I I TE.IYl I ITEM C CHECK NUMBER N NUME:ER D DATE N NAME J J) ES C:R IPT• ION A AMOUNT A AMOUNT 7 1 ' "� V V �� 17 �ti 0 051/18/89 � �r 1_,� �, t f : f 1 L 1 Y , INC. ; ; �! !- +'� • •~ 9 9 :> �" 2 299.25 7 _ U 0 0 ;rte_, 1 �214 „ 0 0 0 5 / 1 _ r E E Y E F TRUCK F A fi �T , ' '�" U P P L I E S VEHICLE 1 T . � 8 1 17 . 58 ,: 1 0 B BRAD R A G A N I I N C. S S LJ f'' f' 1 I E �3 V E H I CL E 4 4 7 : . h �2. 4 473 62- 7282 1 101400 0 0 5 / 1 , -'/89 B BUILDERS SQUARE M MA INT MATERIAL 8 89.97 8 89.97 744 =, 1 101650 t tai 11818"e P PURF E:IND, MARY P. F FEES FOR �EF'tV I CE � �'� . �� 7 79.06 7'2184 1 110::90 0 05/18/189 C CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP COMPANY S SUPPLIiE'� OFFICE 5 50.10 5 50.10 7285 1 110460 0 05/18/89 C CAREER TRACK INC:. T TRAVEL ,S TRAIN 6 6.00 6 6.00 7286 1 110700 0 05118/89 u uASTLE DI,JIGN & DEVELOPMENT D DE1=OSI i'.S PAYABLE- 5 5Z.04 5 52.0.4_ 7287 1 130525 0 05/18/89 C CHEMICAL RESOURCES CORP. R RE=.F!AIR MAINT /B 1 199.50 1 199.50 7283 1 131 100 0 05/18/89 C CH IPPE:WA SPRINGS W WATER FOR COOLER 1 162.72 74*Z'8;, 1 140205 . .05/18/89 C CLEAN STEP RUGS F FEES FOR. 2E:RVICE FEES FOR rte,Eh V I C•E 1 13.35 2 25.70 f 7290 1 150900 -. 0 05118/ 89- C COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORIATION R REf- *.ATR. MAINT... .:7 VOUC:HREG CITY OF MAPl._EWOOD PAGE 05 1 - / -.�, / 1 ►.� ! �..� -., 1 J r �ijaUt�i-{ :h:'��Hf:.�.:K REt "A S'FER Ff_iR PERIOD 05 VOUCHER/ i.:HE C K VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITfi:m I T l~ �� H . C: E C: K NUMBER NUI E'.ER DATE NAME DESC.R tPT I N AMOUNT AMOUNT � UNIFORMS CLOTH 19.47 UNIFORMS c:1...o'rH 19.47 ' UilI FO R lyl S CLOTH . 1 9 . l _ - UNIFORMS CLOTH 45.42 i U N I F0Rl{!::.j CL.0_f H 46 . 42 UNIFORMS CLOTH 45.4::: UNIFORMS CLOTH 45.. 4`1 UN IFClRM'S 11 C.LU rH 53.86 UNIF0R.1 +! S &- CLOTH __ __._.. _ _ .._._._.. _ 5.3. U N I F 0 R rfl'%2j ;. CLOTH = = E UNIFORMS & CLOTH 53.86 UruIF��M� f;: CLU'rH ,,; .3 4 ; UNIFORMS U: CL0TH 34.39 UNIFORMS 31 CLOTH 3.4. 31 9 U N I F.CiRlyiS _ LGTN ._ __..:___.. _.. __ _ _ __ - - - -___ _ ;34 .39-- UNIFORMS Y CLOTH �1 = 79 ice. • 1 UNIFORMS ,a: CLOTH 1..•54 U lV I F+ 0 R M S ;x C:LU T 18i,54 UN.I F0R11S & CLOTH 18.54 694.97 i 7.301_ 306,00 05/1. 189 G.A.T. BUSINEG23 SERVICE JUDG.CleiENTS &.--LOSSES 4 1 227 .6... _ --- _ ----- _._....__... :_...__..__.._..:__..__.._._._. _. J UDGEME_ NTS LOS SE: S 353.44 i J UDGEM i.NT S LOSSES 1 , Z/5 .71 51 834.80 7302 300800 05/18/89 G. F . u.A. I:,U s 10..00 10.00 7303 302350 05/18189 GEORGIA STATE UNiVERS"TY BOOKS 2.2"5-0 _ 1 7304 304" 565 05/18/89 GI LL•:E:RT , JIM F EEC FOR SERVICE 100.00 100.00 7305 3026 0 05/1$/89 GLADSTONE LUMBER MAR14 � SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 49.18 49.18 1 7306 30Z900 0. / 18 /ED.9 GLE.NWC►c: D I NC I~ E:WUClD FEE.; VOUC:HREG C:I'rY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE ' 0 5 « r 13r 4 " Y .0 1I E R/ C -H E` J--w R E l►j l S, 7 E R F FD R }-' E �,.1: O D 05 VOUCHER/ CHECK VEND! - -J c C H F C VENDOR I TEM ITEM CHECK NUM% R NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT CONTRACT P'YM. ��►7 r L. CONTRACT P 3' M r 14.• =� CONTRACT P'Y M 6r_'. CONTRACT F"Ytl. 14w'.33 C:ONTRAC:T PYId. 28.66 CONTRACT PYM.. 487.22 CONTRACT PYMr 107r66 67.46 7313 ~40110 05/18/89. HEJNY RENTALS, INC ou'r ;IDE RENT EQUIP 28.00 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 5 . 00 53.00 7314 3,50880 _ 0.5.1 1. r.J 1. 8 i .. _ H O /. S 1 !tl G T L•.!Y V 1 \ O U f L N V r FEES CONSUL- T I iR G....... FLAN DEP PAY 617.55 1 , 339 .05 7315 3513,00 05/18/89 HURSNELL, JUDITH F ROGRAM .: UPPLIES 5.84 _ VEHICLE ALL,ONAtNC. c: 4.00 } PROGRAM SUPPLIES .46 10.30 � 7316 351 400 05/18/89 HORWATH , TOM CONTRACT P'YM, 720.00 720.00 7317 430600 05/18/89 KOKESH ATHLETIC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 971.73. :{ PROGRAM SUPPLIES 49030.88 7318. 400.300_.. 0511;8/89. _...KOKE3H ATHLE"r.I C PROGRAM-SUPPLIES w.._ . _ ._ _.. _ _.4 9 .9&.._. 7319 451800 05/18/89 LAN HULA HARDWARE SLIP- Pi. I E3 'VEHICLE 50.04 50.04 � 732:0 4602:75 05/18/89 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA MEMBERSHIP 114.75 114.75 7321 461250, ... 05/18/89 LEWIS PUBL.I3HER3, INC: r B,it0K;:; ____.- __ __ _._ __ - - -. _ .__ ._. _.. _ ____._ -..._ _ __._._ 49 .95.- 73'2Z 470700 05/18/89 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS SUPPLIES OFFICE 52.50 52.50 � 7;' 490'x:00 05/18/89 LUGER LUM1 ER C:0r GUP'PI_1ES E.QUIPMEN! 2.2 10 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 65.45 � M A I N T MATERIAL 6 4 .610 __ ._ . _.__ SUPPLIES EQUIPM -NT 32.85 141400 7324 501 "2:2:5 05/18/89 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT SUP'P'LIES VEHICLE ;109.1u SUPPLIES VEHICLE 185r00 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 2 5 It, 4 0 549.50 , 7325 501550 05/18/89 MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, LTD. REPAIR MAINT /B x:17.48 REPAIR s: MAINT /L, 4.05.17 � 7 3�.6 511600 05/18/89 MASYS CORP RI. PAIR MAIN /E 1, 13�.r 0 0 1, 1 2. 0 0 511750 05/I8I,:-:,9 MAUT:% PAINT COMPANY Z`3L)PP'LIES ..JANITOR _ Z9.94 _ Z; +_.94. _. ' 7..;1•:_,.: 50478 05/18/89 MC:UONALD3 PROGRAM SUP PI_ 1. ES A .2.5 14 5 VOUCHREG VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER 7329 520500 7:3:0 530850 7::31 5404-00 7 *-.3 1 3 2 5 4 07-#/ 0 7334 561050 73::05 570090 7:336 570500 7337 640550 733.8 640805 7339 660800 7340 •62400 7:---'. 4 1 6 6 *416 0 0 7:3 4 Z' 6 7 0 4 b C-) 7343 6701---kOO 7344 x=80()40 7 451 6 9 IS 0 0 7*'.---,'4 6 7 0 Q 5 0 0 7 4 7 7' 11 .7-14 5 7 4 8 711500 7349 711700 7:51 74090f.) CITY OF l*4Af-.t. E'WCl0D PAGE 8 9 ,--% T- V 0 U I I E R 11 C. f i E C K' 'ZE G I -E R FOR PLRIOD 05 CHECK VENDOR DATE NAME 05/18/89 MCGUIRE, MIL'-'.'I-IAEL pMr 05/16/89 METRO EAST DEVELO il"NT PARTNER 05/18/89 MIKE'S' LP GAS SERVICE CENTER 05/18/89 MINN COMM 05/18/39 05/ 18/89 05/18/89 05/1;3,/8; 05/18/89 0.5/18189 U5 /1C, /619'- 0 5 18 G 9 05/18/89 05 8/ 9 0 5 8 8 9 0 1151 6 b I 8 9 05/1$/$9 05/18/89 Ott 1811C-119 0 5 18 9 MINNESOTA CELLULAR MN U.C. FUND MOGREN BROS. MOTOROLA, INC NELSON, JEAN NELSONS AUTO SERVICE NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF NORTHWOOD HARDWARE NORWEST INVESTMENTS SERVICI- NUMUG NUTESON, LAVERNE O'LOUGHLIN, PAT OSWALD FIRE HOSE P.C. SOLUTIONS PE 1- E P'. S 0 N I E' E L L I C 0 N V E R 3 E 2t. J E N' S L---' h PHOTOS TO GO PIONEER RIM PRO!:- ESSIONAL. P R C-I C- 6L. SS RA-DIO SHAC"-[:*l' a 1 T F lyl I TE M C HE E C• K D'E'S C: R I PT 10N AMOUNT AMOUNT VEHICLE ALLOWANCE.* 350.00 350.00 .SUBS & MEMBERSi-ii-PS z 5.0 0 , 0,0 J0,00 SUF'PLIE,"-3 VEH.ICLE 16-q- ..:3'8 164 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 40.00 CUTE IDE RENTAL 171.00 211.00 f:-. L E Pi -i 0 N E 37 5 37.85 U • ltl Y C 0 lyl P 3,99.1-3 -3 9 9 . I MAINT MATERIAL 139.52 MAINT..MAl'-E.RlAL. .1 5 2 -2-7-9,-0-4- EQUIPMENT OTHER 906.00 906.00 VEHICLE AL.LOWANCE 11.4.7 11.47 REPAIR & M-AINTIV... 73,10- U T I L. I T I ES I A..?. 8 . 10 UTILI'rIES IT6.60 3-04.7.0 SUPPL.IES EQUIPMENI 7.39. 7 -'34 9 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 51036.56 0'-:'- ,56 MEMBERSH.L T P 40.00 40.00 TRAVEL :& TRAIN 6.00 TRAVEL TRA-lN.lN-G-.- 6,_0.0.._._ FEES FOR SERVICE 75.00 75.00 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 16.00 16"00 EQUIPMENT OFFICE SUPPIES OFFICE 50.00 580 . 0 0 I C. 0 N'i'* R A v-,, y m 31500.00 1 6 0-0 • 0 0 FEES FOR SERVICE 4- . 8 7 .4.87 S'UPPLILS VEHICLE .."'57 �37 :_.57.:7 T FEE:: ;r FOR %SER V A C' E:: 10 4• . 3 i 04. .1 U P P I E VEHICLE 6 u 9 f.= . � : 9 VOUC:HRIEG CITY OF: MAPLEWOOD � PAUE 5) FOR PERIOD 05 VOUCHER! - CHECK VF..ND0R C:HE: C.!�; VE ».NDt,lR 1'rk :M ITE11 CHECK NUME=ER NUME:ER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 735 741: 00 05/1.8/89 RAINBOW INC. PROS RAM SLIP PL I ES 31.82 31 .82 7:5 � 74 15.i C5 / 1 �.� RAM ;EY COUNTY tARF; tEC f U' IDE RENTAL =rw f '5 .00 ' 7 F 4 1(` 7 � � 05/18/89 RAM E Y t U (J N Y L U G A L. FISCAL S C A L . 5 c? LEGAL FISCAL _ 4 t. 4 LEGAL. FISCAL 1 1 15 ! LEGAL FISCAL LEGAL FISCAL. 2.48 LEGAL €-� ISCAL � .;�;;�; 2:f�, I;i 7355. ? 4. 1O t a 0 F /_ 1,; / �= ' RAM ' E;. Y G Ct U IV 7 Y CHIEFS OF POLICE T Fi A Lr E L 2:TRAIN b" . C 0 ; -U 7y,56 742:110 05/18/89e RAMSEY EMERG. MEDICAL SERVICES SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 634. 75 634.75 7'357 74 725 o5/18/851 RAf''.TOR REHABILITATION FEES FOR SERVICE.' 50.00 50.00 7358 74 '' ?0to 05/18/89 RAY DAVIS 3)0hiS :�►.UPPLIE,'r-j. VEHIC:L _ . _ _ 16.�F SUPPLIES JANITOR ZO.49 SUPPLIES JANITOR' 8.00 44.74 77,59 761600 05/18/89 RONS PRINTING SUPF''L..IES 0f= F=1C:Cl 15.65 15065 7360 7 6�10 0 05/18/89 ROSEVILLE. SC:HOOLS PROPERTY RENTAL 7361 780300 05/14/89 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE: :4.34 tfll4C. COMMODITIES 136.00 _ ;SUPPLIES OFF ICE 14.40 UFPL I E� OFFICE 95.84 X70 .58 7:"'l 62 780350 05/18/89 S.E.H. OUTSIDE E G FEES 4 4 0 . 3 4 240.34 7'; =c 800400 05/18/89 SEVEN CORNERS ACE HARDWARE ;MALL . TOOL4 109.33 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 19.95 -'8 7.64 fw 001 t 00 05118189 _ Et ti f•ON FR IN,rING PUBLISHING ... -- - - -- POSTAGE 11.00 39394.80 7:65 `2 10 600 05/18/89 SHORT ELLIOT HENDERIC:K23ON ou -rsIDE ENGINEERING 5,8E:..._ 7'--66 7'--66 :, t;�15U 05/18/89 SILTMAN, MRS. ELYWIN PROGRAM REG FEES 32 •00 32.00 7367 ; =20 2 1.3 0 o5/18/89 ,:,L•'..%'K , EUGENE PROGRAM RE G FEES x:.-.50 .00 250.00 11 7 :: 6 , 82.'0 6 5 � j �; ! 1 �/ 8 Q S d Y D E Rt S D F U r PROGRAM : C � A M r_F F LI ES 65 F 65.95-1. _ 7369 0 00 05/1., -tr8 2:,0F..f'WARE CLEARING }-tOU'',E REPAIR 2: MAIN -f /F_ 39 •: -8 REPAIR M A I N ^ / E - . _ 8 RrPA .. R yA I N•/E 39 . REPAIR M A I N T / E. REPAIR »: MAIN-r /E 39.38 .. .....,--.+ csw.:. a' ^'+°.- v: F": ra7L'.«�nn'rnLS.-,:.,s:.a^ -: r,.^. x:-^. x-, arocr. �r+ in: sres:.^+' a�.;;. e;" rti-' Y: n.; uCS. Bxbxb^ a�, s. K ..+%•'u,?:.•cas:a...e+.ea�.ao. was.: c? <!- ..a:.:.wv. w.v:_•m-..:. ..-. i.s..... u, .- ._.__. -_ , .._. -._ .. .. ,.. .,.. .... - ...- _: -.. ._. .. .: _. - - ,.....,. ,..._. .. .. _.. ... V =i U C: H l�t F� t 11 .Y i�i F= {�4 �� r'' 1. E W �:1 PAGE i 05/1�Zl /89 13 =,n44 V 0 U HERiCIiEC:K fE (-iI S TE'r1 FOR PEwRIt:tD 05 CHECK VE=:1VD��P CHE: C': r; V�_NDOR I T E # "�i ITE: 1�1 CHEG1'':: ,. NUMt.Eh NUMBER DA`f E NAME DE h IPT 10N AMOUNT AMOUNT FtEr'AIFi 8 MAINE /E« 3r, `"� . REPAIR R MAINT /!: �� ^� i� 3.'.38 REPAIR MA I ljl "t' rE...... _ _. _.__ _ .. _ _ 39 3 13EF''A I 2,: MA INT /E :3' . 7U FtEPAIR ,a MAI NT/ E:: 2:3.7 5 � REPAIR 4:. VIA INT. /Ew ;�::�.7 5 Fi EPA IR & MAINT /E 33.75 REPAIR & MA INI /E 33.75 � REPAIR_ & MAIN1.fE.._..... _._. :33.7 REPAIR & MAINT /E 33.7 FtEPA I R .1.3': MA I NI /E 3:3. 7v 585.00 � 7370 831600 �:� 8._ C.� � I 1 :� r �., � ' S 0 i S >.., P ;., F' F I t1 E � h C D U CTS �:, SUPPLIEzS OFFICE 96. t- � SUPPLIES 0 F'ICk 23.76 SUP'P'LIES Ot= F- IC;E_ -.... _ 088. 15 _ ..:.........._._. __ -_. __..- ......_ - SUPPLIES OFF= I C:E. 9.44 SUPPLIES JANITOR 9.;:`0 1 - SUPPLIES OFFICE 10.66 SUPPLIES OFFICE. 0 . 0 0 1 S, U P P L I E-'.&_ _OF Fl CE. ... ...._.. _ - _.._._..___._-..._.- F'EPAIFt MAINT /D 7 9.68 SUPPLIES OFFICE 84.75 � SUF'F'LTE:.E; OFFICE U4. 5 _. SUPPLIES OFFICE 26.50 SUPPLIES OFFICE:: 40.75 614.88 i 7371 8 402:15 05/18/89 ST .JOHN'S, HOSPITAL DEPCiSI TS, PAY" 540.10 540. 10 .1 7. 37. -. 840400 05/13/8'� ST.PAUL CITY OF R E. PA I R il _ _ 4 4 �... REPAIR MAIiY•1• /E 203.40 REPAIR & PalAIN_ErP 199.81 I k E P A .I. K & M A L..N T /.:h F'EPAIR' MAINT /k FI s „ : 37 1 CONTRACT PYid. 15.00 2 � t)3: F; 3 1 737:3 E, 40F300 0b/18 9 S`i".PAUL DI SPAT CH PIONE.E:: #=t PLIL,L.ISHINf; 15.+.08 156.08 f 7:374 84- IU 0 Q5/ 18/89 STANDARD SPRING : ALIGNME.1~!T REPAIR MA.IN f ..V.E.N 593 1 5 ...... -:.... 59_,.*.75 _ 1': 7h :�U {� Uri / 1 _� / {.t'+ .`- ,TATt: OF MINNE: S�j..l..A FEES FOR SE:RV:C C E:: %::So . u0 30. 00 I 7376 85 035 t 05 9 : U EI l h B A N RAI-E A U [ h O R I T Y 'SUBS .+_: MEMBERSHIP 11050.00 1,050.00 I '7377 85115!5 Ob/18/89 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC::. SUE''F t IES Ut F.lCk 737's 860100 0 5/ 18 +/ +.d 9 1. J. AUTO � A i 1 S SUPPLIES fi I:. - 1 r . : t. � j ] '} i ( �+ (• `: i i^i /.s t � .L �. 5 / "� ,µii 0 5 / 1 i j /+ 8. .,i i� t� r C'' i:+ �y' r {� 1. . A . S C..• H 1 #� iJ f'•. i +} a! � � 1 M �.J � f 14 � y� } f y� { r {� h r (, ( j 1' 1 A .i. i •i 1' 1: 1 � A 1 ti C L M A I- � . R I /fit I.... '�' } ' "' + �+ a .� 473. . 9 lei { 0 Cll'Y OF MAi"LJ_-'W00D PAGE I I VOU CHREG 05- 12- 8 9 13n.44 FOR PEFt.10D 01:5 VOUCHER/ I T 1. Il CH E K C H E C. K V F N D C'l R C H i':'� K V E N D;*-"I R T IPT ION A M 0 tj N AMOUNT NUMBER N U M.E-,E R D A TE NAME 7 o 6 0 3 0 5 0 5 18 /'9=351 T J T S H I S' P G R A M (.1 F Pit. 1 E S 377.34 1/ tJNIFOf'k'M,S 1�_J_OTH 57 . t", 0 F' R 0 G R A lyl U P I-` L. I E lQ0 . 00 6+:_4 * . 9 4 7 '3. 1 :_'. 1 0 15 0 5 1 T . K. D A . 55463.57 0 U' S I D E E N G I N E El--� 1 N '1 9. 0 9 Z 51 0 U 0 11-1 T S I D E N 44 .4-4. 4*747 8 5 73 tJ e- 5 0 0 5 r 1 T A R G E s T 0 R. S P L I S 0 F' 16 6 79 S Ll PP L I ES E Q U I P M L'N I . r R E P A I R 3:K MA IN" I B "9 _7 9 • T_ 7. 73 8 43' 860700 05/ 18/8 P -'L.AS TAUDMANq DOLIU TRAVEL TRAIN 130.80 130.80 7384 7' 122-, 0 0 5 TOLL COMPANY MAINT MATE RIAL 5t,5 4 21 55 . 43 0 0 T C. S. MFG . f. S.- M -f, /-v M td RE N'r v REPAIR 0 00 7385 881300 05/18/ 8 9 TWIN CITIES MAGIC COSTUMl_'. PROGRAM SUPPL-IES. 7 3 CD. 6 890600 05/18/89 U.H• L■ INC. 3 LJ P P L I E'S JANITOR 64. 14 9 0 0 REPAIR &.. MA I N-1 7387 Clooloo 05/18/89 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & ci-o*rH 179-70 U N I F 0 R lyl'z'73 & CLOTH 211:.111 1:351 UNIFORMS L 0 T H 66 , �4 5 U N I F CIR IYIS CLOTr 125, 5 UNIFORMS &_-CLOTH 1 65.-1 5 UNIFORMS C L 0 T 165.15 I -LOTH UNFORMS C 73.70 U N I F OR IIS CL 0 T H 9 . 8 1 7 3 881 9002%. 05 18 8 5 UNITED SUPPLY CORP. S U PP L I E S VE H I C LE 4 ZZ . 6 6 42.66 7389 900600 051181854 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL SUPP I. I ES [:Q U I P ML N I 65.60 65.60 7390 9 105 0 0 05/18/89 V AS K 0 RUBBISH REMOVAL FEES FOR SERVICE 199.00 .14'.." 0 0 E_ E S FOR R V I C E 2 3 5 8 7 . 1 3. 7 _ 9 1 911800 0 5 f 18 8 VIK'*ING STEEL COMPANY MAINT MATE"RIAL 21 105-81 105.87 7 2 4,31 0 7 0 0 05/IS/89 WAHL & WAHL REPAIR MAIN -I' B 97.50 10 .97 E . T35,1`31 34 0 J 18 W A ]"E R P R Q 1) Ll C. TS R E F, A I R MAINT/U 17 5 17.56 7 *'--,9 4 �40500 0 5 l'o/ 8 9 Wl:. BER- TRO SETH I NC U P P L I E S VE H I C L E 34. 5 '34.54' ( T3 9 5 9 4. 5 5 518 W E H R M A N E3 E R c"I L Y A S'S I A E S INC FEES CONSULTING 400-00 400.00 iiOULC Hr EG CITY OF FYlAPL:-Wi OD PAGE 1 .05 1Z. 89 13.-,44 VOUCHER/C. REGISTER FOR PERIOD V O.0 C fiE Fit- _ ' C:HECK VENDOR CHE C:F~ VENDOR I TEll ITk: N CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DA'L'E NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 7396 411.0 0 05/18/89 WESTERN IBC.OD PRODUCTS ASSN. BvOi: 8.04 8.04 7.1.7... -. r�{��.f.1.�. !} "�/ Q.`7� .. XEROX. CUhF� P. j` _ r. _..._ ._... __ _ ..... ........ — U] �j lt..a.i .- -5,24- _. _.._._ . -.._ . _._.. .... _.... ... _._......_. -._.. yD D L J i COS it S 8.74 DUF' C0 STS 25.f:8 DUF' C0STO _ 40 .O2 DUF COSTS 25.68 DUF' COSTS 50.52 156. 8 7398 970700 05/18/89 YOC:UM OIL CO. 1NV OF SUPPLIES - r,396.00 71395.00 TOTAL CHECKS 557,831.50 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 05/05/89 CHECK #8470 - CHECK #8624 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY SLAVIK, THOMAS J. 11107.70 McGUIRE, MICHAEL A. 21634.46 BLACKSTONE, GAIL 11427.70 ZAWACKI, KATHRYN 11004.50 BERM, LOIS N. 11034.10 JAHN, DAVID J. 837.76 SWANSON, LYLE 11090.45 CUDE, LARRY J. 276.80 OSTER, ANDREA J. 902.28 MIKISKA, WILLIAM 172.80 FAUST, DANIEL F. 21033.30 TAYLOR, LINDA 11050.28 MATHEYS, ALANA K. 11083.88 VIGNALO, DELORES A. 11083.89 ANDERSON, CAROLE J. 11243.88 LA MOTTE, MARLENE 182.00 AURELIUS, LUCILLE E. 11878.90 SELVOG, BETTY D. 238.00 SCHADT, JEANNE L. 11029.48 KELSEY, CONNIE L. 562.01 VIETOR, LORRAINE S. 977.14 HENSLEY, PATRICIA A. 653.37 JAGOE, CAROL 742.66 CARLE, JEANETTE E. 11097.92 OLSON, SANDRA 755.19 COLLINS, KENNETH V. 21084.50 RICHIE, CAROLE L. 963.01 SVENDSEN, JOANNE M. 11221.75 NELSON, ROBERT D. .11800.50 FULLER, ELAINE 366.34 OMATH, JOY E. 972.68 MARTINSON, CAROL F. 936.68 ZAPPA, JOSEPH A. 11590.33 STILL, VERNON T. 11378.28 SKALMAN, DONALD W. 11423.38 FRASER, JOHN 630.26 NELSON, CAROL M. 11511.08 MORELLI, RAYMOND J. 11355.20 STEFFEN, SCOTT L. 11543.45 ARNOLD, DAVID L. 11561.48 BANICK, JOHN J. 11378.28 BOHL, JOHN C. 11689.64 CAHANES, ANTHONY G. 11800.50 CLAUSON, DALE K. 11403.88 MOESCHTER, RICHARD M. 11520.39 ATCHISON, JOHN H. 11403.88 YOUNGREN, JOHN 11763.72 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 05/05/89 CHECK #8470 - CHECK #8624 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY PELTIER, WILLIAM F. 11561.48 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J. 11343.38 WELCHLIN, CABOT V. 11327.08 LANG, RICHARD J. 11403.88 RAZSKAZOFF, DALE 11454.28 HERBERT, MICHAEL J. 11610.82 DREGER, RICHARD C. 11676.86 STAFNE, GREGORY L. 11403.88 BECKER, RONALD D. 1,695.80 HALWEG, KEVIN R. 11561.48 STOCKTON, DERRELL T. 11403.69 PAULOS, J R., PAUL G. 1,187.80 BOWMAN, RICK A. 1,461.56 KARIS, FLINT D. 11390.28 HEINZ, STEPHEN J. 11446.35 GRAF, DAVID M. 11467.08 THOMALLA, DAVID J. 11531.27 PALMA, STEVEN T. 11248.84 VORWERK, ROBERT E. 11467.08 BERGERON, JOSEPH A. 11907.25 MEEHAN,.JAMES 11760.62 MELANDER, JON A. 11467.08 SAUNDERS, SARAH 659.54 EMBERTSON, JAMES M. 11538.10 WILLIAMS, DUANE J. 11354.90 RABINE, JANET L. 11029.48 STAHNKE, JULIE A. 11029.48 BOYER, SCOTT K. 11009.04 WALDT, CYNTHIA 819.34 RYAN, MICHAEL P. 11878.78 FEHR, JOSEPH 804.68 NELSON, KAREN A. 11087.14 FLAUGHER, JAYME L. 11067.88 WEGWERTH, JUDITH A. 553.93 HAIDER, KENNETH G. 21084.50 CHLEBECK, JUDY M. 1,087.88 MEYER, GERALD W. 11380.84 KANE, MICHAEL R. 11342.28 NAGEL, BRYAN 937.56 LUTZ, DAVID P. 11257.51 KLAUSING, HENRY F. 11197.48 SCHMOOCK, JOHN 11174.48 HELEY, RONALD J. 11154.28 OSWALD, ERICK D. 11196.08 FREBERG, RONALD L. 11160.79 CASS, WILLIAM C. 11704.68 LINDBLOM, RANDY 11048.07 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 05/05/89 CHECK #8470 - CHECK #8624 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY ELIAS, JAMES G. 11334.28 PECK, DENNIS L. 11334.28 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 11610.81 IRISH, BRUCE A. 11635.08 GESSELE, JAMES T. 11487.60 GEISSLER, WALTER M. 11394.75 METZ, TERRY 11314.02 LOFGREN, JOHN R. 942.40 ODEGARD, ROBERT D. 11878.90 BRENNER, LOIS J. 11067.88 KRUMMEL, BARBARA A. 521.95 STAPLES, PAULINE 11642.28 . 2.00 BOWES, WILLIAM 215.00 TRAVERS, D. 103.50 ANDERSON, ROBERT S. 11100.68 LINDORFF, DENNIS P. 1,132.68 GARRY, WILLIAM 907.56 HELEY, ROLAND B. 11175.88 MARUSKA, MARK A. 11342.28 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 818.28 BURKE, MYLES R. 11197.48 SHELDON, LEO 51.25 HANNEGAN, A. 189.00 DREGER, KARI 100.00 WEINHANDL, K. 162.50 MCGIVERN, J. 60.00 PODPESKAR, KIMBERLY J. 95.00 HERBER, T. 110.00 OLSON, C. 80.00 ANDERSON, C. 60.00 BESETH -J R, RONALD 103.75 NELSON, J. 60.00 FISCHER, PATRICIA 30.00 WARD, ROY G. 406.40 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. 11'372.68 GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M. 11157.48 NELSON, JEAN 375.21 HORSNELL, JUDITH A. 567.94 HUTCHINSON, ANN E. 825.59 FISHER, L. 56.00 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M. 31870.75 BARTA, MARIE L. 941.32 OLSON, GEOFFREY W. 11878.90 MISKELL, NANCY 328.59 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L. 490.58 GENEROUS, ROBERT 291.55 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 05/05/89 CHECK #8470 - CHECK #8624 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY ------- - - - - -- ROBERTS, KENNETH ----- - - - - -- 11102.83 EKSTRAND, THOMAS G. 11579.15 OSTROM, MARJORIE 11563.08 CARVER, NICHOLAS N. 11187.88 WENGER, ROBERT J. 1,286.28 LACASSE, CASEY 273.00 NADEAU, EDWARD A. 11177.07 MULWEE, GEORGE W. 11152.68 NUTESON, LAVERNE S. 11536.68 BREHEIM, ROGER W. 11174.28 EDSON, DAVID B. 1,174.28 GERMAIN, DAVE 1,174.28 MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 11288.68 SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 11053.48 $172,353.93 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION AFSCME 2725 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM L.E.L.S. Z1 $ 91103.32 C1 23,836.00 U1 483.83 160.00 U3 18.00 Z2 238.00 P1 526.50 $ 33,839.15 GRAND TOTAL $206,193.08 MEMORANDUM jetion by Council to Endorsed...- TO City Manager Modif led__~_~-�- FROM: Director of Community Development Rele -- �e d�_�-�� SUIBJECTx Cleanup af Demolished Building DA7Ex May 15, 1989 / D= Introduction The City has received several complaints from the neighbors of the Bossard Addition at Cope* and Hazelwood regarding the large pileof debris from the demolition of an old shed on Lot 3 (PIN 10-31-O3). The owner, William Bossardv was notified by mail twice in June of 1988 to clean up the mess. When he did not respond, a court Otation was issued. He has not responded to these notices, or cleaned up the debris. Alternatives As Mr. possard has not responded to City orders to remove the debris, the only other alternative we have is City removal and assessment of the cost. Recommendation Accept the low bid of$1,100 from Ray Anderson and Son, order remOva1 of the debris and assess the cost against the Property's taxes. kd MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner, Kenneth Roberts SUBJECT: Registered Land Survey LOCATION: 2090 County Road D APPLICANT/OWNER: Leslie and Lucille Hause DATE: May 5, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION E -3 Action by Councilr Modif Rejected Date. The, app icant has f il ed a request f or a registered 1 and survey f or. three parcels of property .between County Road D and Lydia. Registered Land Surveys require the approval. of the City Council and the signatures of the Mayor and City Clerk. This is the reason that this request is being presented. DISCUSSION The appl icant is proposing the RLS f or the parcel s so that new legal descriptions will be created for each. It is understood that this is for simpl if ying the identi+ ication of each property. No property Vines are proposed to be changed nor is the number of parcels in the subject area. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Registered Land Survey as submitted , . krhausplit Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Proposed Registered Land Survey )EXTANT iANOVIEW VIKING /I WHITE BEAR LAKE 68 (1) BRENWOOD CURVE. iiiiijil. 77, 74 cn GALL AV w J WOODLYIVN. A o (I) �E BRENNER AV a OODLYNN AV Wa FuRNfSS o i } W v CTF AV N cr v z. W =Y W N t? AVM o Z w 19 = J 6 WPB Y RIDGE Im v W W _ STAND- Q Q �Q2' - MAPE�3Q mN EAM AV. a. : MAPLE VIEW AV z AV (MESSABI AV) 1 NORTH SA IN T PA UL 1J_4 {'1oo_if AV i Y W v L�ti RIE RD 0 w RD H Q1 't S� PN Z --I TRai� LOCATION MAP z ATTACHMENT 1 4 N REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0. Rassey County C.I.H. at N.E. MM _ Corner Sea, 20 T29 R22 .• r� r,• .. ZA3? 2636.97 - - r, • 97 96 ' 26 3.a r- • rn •"' ' ' EA 5 T 3.65 rn . I r � ' Ramsey County C.I.M. at N.E. 33 33 North lies" of 3, 1232.70 ft. Corner Section 2, T29, R22. of N. 1265.70 ft, of Nei} 1 of NEJ of Seatlon 2, ..' :3�9 31: - ' rawt lice of W *et 790,89 ft ... .. .. 9? ... .. '2'63.63': ... -. oi Nwk of Nab or seo.•2. -790-89 THIS •.LINE SHOWS MWASUREMNTS AT RIGHT ANGLES M INDICATED PROPERTY ... • , . OR STREET LINES, W. line of X. 263.63 ft of t W. 790.89 ft of M' of N* and E. line of W. 527.26 ft. r.0 ' Centerline of 50 ft wide Standard 011 pipeline • CY N easement, Doe. No.446394 �` 3 O N runs parallel with and 567 co I... ft S. of N. line See. 2. QD N N. line of N.S.P. easement runs a+1 parallel with and 497.5 ft S. of - North line of N.S.P. N. line of So*. 2, :Doo. No.509167 TRACT A ti easement. O co m _ - - - - - - Cbl - W- - - -- . 1 CID ao o N �• N Z- cv Centerline"of 165 ft wide N.S.P. transmission 0 0 N •O N line easemento Doc. No. 440023, runs frown a cv Z Cn point on E. line of Section 2, distant 573 ft S. of N.E. Corner of Section 29 westerly to point on N-3 j line # distant 5 71.7 ft S. of Nk Corner of Section 2. - - - 1 - . - - - - - - - •� - - I • - - _ - - - - - - - - _ _ -..3. line of -N.S.P. - - easement. S.'line of N.S.P. easement --� per Doc. No. 509167. Lu 1 g 1 � � 0 : 1 • 18 X09•• � 0 N 660 IT' S6'0 E 0. - 263.86 lo ,g g 0.01 So Q 7• .so - -/t n•t1. #59.16 N: C 0006'00' 0 .Y e O 2{3.83 ;o t o " M 33 33 • c0 P- M M V NO, TRACT B N 1. Bearinst are based on an assumed disco Lion W of EAST for the N. line of the NE* of 3ec.2 3 O co � ^ W _ in N m 2. O indioates iron pipe monument set co ,_ -� F•- N with = Cap 0 14946. N N o 3. 0 indicates tour JUDICIAL set. C1 Cr • O O ° 4. A 1918 N.S.P. 100 ft wide easement, Book 6639 Page 3139 lies within the 225 ft Z easement shown. ; SCALZ DI D • 243.65 • ' Ia' - WEST 2 6 3.6 5 " o o 50 100 200 �.... SC a I s : 1 lnoh • 100 feet 33 33 . 9. line of•N. 1321.30 ft S. line of N. 1265.70 ft of E. of Section 2, T29, R22. 263.63 ft of W. 790.89 ft of NORTH LAND S U R V E Y I C O• NWi of NEJ of Section 2. SHOREVIEW JMI it OTA 3HP 3 Attachment 2 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCAT*ION: APPLI CANT/OWNER : PROJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Renewal Century Avenue Richard Pearson Rol I ing Hi I s Second Addition April 26, 1989 SUMMARY E -Ll. Action by Co=oilv En0Lorsed',,,'.,',, Modified ...� R e J e c t e d DatO_ The applicant is requesting renewal of the conditional use permit for the Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park Second Ad-dition, BPAX61ROLIND On May 11, 1987, the City Council approved the CUP subject to 15 conditions (see page 5) . On May 23, 1988, the City Council granted a one year renewal f or the CUP a ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 36-442 (e) of the City Code requires that all conditional use permits be reviewed by the City Council within, one year of the date of initial approval and as often as specified thereafter. At the subsequent reviews, the City Council may specify an indefinite term or a specific term, not to exceed five (5) years. DISCUSSION The project has been developing in accordance with the original conditions. A one-year renewal should be granted since approximately two-thirds of the home sites are occupied. RECOMMENDATION Renewal of the conditional use permit for the Rol 1 ing Hi I s Second Addition for one year subject to the original conditions of approval. rol I hil 1-2 Attachmentsi 10 -Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Rolling Hills Second Addition Plat 4. May 11, 1987 CUP Conditions E LOCATION MAP z Attachment 1 Q N M1 41D lok 2nd ADDITION d. eon 0 Pail;�UD: art n • LL! o le. 31. S 3 ma- • 4f R3 --met. wa;^-t V-0 ",%vuoff—o -W W: %a I" EMEML-M pi w p m 0 �io mi =-mo-L 4W.R tt F7 z- rvy PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment 2 ROLLING HILLS SECOND ADDITION ROLLING HILLS MOBILE HOME PARK r •• •,• 100* a 000 Lr Ammew Ado • 1 • •.• • ' N r , ,j �+ • , �. / • % .' • r n A r • r w i r OF , -- • D .. ol •• --- — IVY AVE. k ROLLING HILLS SECOND ADDITION f� f.j +I ¢I �I �{ 4 tj Attachment 3 z E .'c i i i 4 N Approval is.subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with state requirements. 2. There shall be no exterior storage of equipment such as bikes, hoses, lawnmowers, rakes, etc. 3. Each lot shall be allowed an exterior storage shed of no more than 120 square feet. Such shed must be kept in workmanlike repair and painted. '- 4. Each lot shall be allowed to have children's play equipment, unless the developer provides a tot lot adjacent to the community building, 5. Each lot shall be allowed a deck and carport, provided that either structure shall not be closer than ten feet to any adjacent dwelling. Carports shill not be closer than six feet to a private street and shall not have walls. On lots along Century Avenue, sheds shall not be closer than thirty -seven feet to the right -of -way. 6. All mobile homes must be new, skirted and tied down. Skirting shall extend from the frame of the chassis to the ground. Skirt- ing must be painted to complement the mobile home. 7. All tie -downs and foundations must meet the state building code. 8. The sign regulations for the R -3 district shall apply. 9. The following minimum setbacks shall apply for dwellings: a. Twenty .feet to a private street. b. Forty -seven feet to the Century Avenue right -of -way. C. Five .'foot side yard setback on the side opposite the entry. d. Twenty foot side yard setback on the entry side. e. Seventy feet to a railroad track. 10. Sales of mobile homes shall be limited to those owned by park residents and those sold by the park owner for placement in the park. 11. The storm shelter shall be kept free of storage. The shelter shall be kept open at all times or keys shall be made available to all residents in a manner to be approved by the Director of Emergency Services. 12. The City shall not be responsible for maintaining any of the internal improvements. 13. Water lines shall be flushed at least once a year. 14. Parking shall only be permitted on one side of each street. No parking shall be permitted closer than thirty feet to any intersection. 15. Adherence to the approved site plan and related conditions. Any significant change must be approved by the Community Design Review Board. Minor changes may be approved by Staff. un ' lmember Anderson . 5 Ayes - all . Attachment 4 Seconded by Co c� y TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: A PL I CANT/ OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Renewal 1225 Frost Avenue George Hirsch George's Auto May 12, 1989 SUMMARY E —� Action by Councils Endorsed Modified Rejected D ate I NTRODUPT I ON The applicant is requesting the renewal of the conditional use permit f or a 40- by 40-f oot metal building in a BC (business commercial) district, BACKGROUND On May 91 1988, the City Council approved the CUP subject to three conditions. (See page 4.) ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 36-442 (e) of the City Code requires that all co' nditional use permits be reviewed by the City Council within one year of the date of initial approval and as often as is specified thereafter. The City Council may specify renewal terms of up to five years at each subsequent renewal request. DISCUSSION Staff had previously noted the outdoor storage of approximately 40 junk automobiles on the site. According to the applicant, these are owned by a tenant of the adjacent property whose lease expired May 1v 1989. Subsequently, these have been removed. This has been the only known problem with this site, RECOMMENDATION Renewal of the conditional use permit for George's Auto for one Year subject to the original conditions of approval . geoautocup Attachments: 1. Location Map 2a Property Line/Zoning Map 3. May 9, 1988 CUP Conditions 0 O m O 0 O Q O O ; q O M O Ea a E x E m Saint Paul e i i E 3 0 O� e 0 c a m c REVISED 4 -08-85 LOCATION MAP GLADSTONE LAND USE PLAN 2 ATTACHMENT 1 at 2. 0 N S � b _h'r. pn d.1i. 7 7^ a ,1v 8 ��'r•� 20 ti� •9 4 9 e 34� • J 1 1 5 ,+ IB 19 52 s 1 bllB� 5 1'�� 17 35 10 1 1 l5 le 51 °o T Cse. a ,n� 12 7 ' 13 la (Z4) - fit, .` ' 36 ° _ 1�1 ! .i.; (zn �') Av �..zo 'r.+ 671 60 a^.o 6q C 3Z' R RY sn �a 147.148 a I 43 1 441 45 1 4e o �) 1 41 1421��s 3e y 39 40 o 14 1z r R IS II _ 1u L ID i 1_. 10 4Q! -I h7 IG � IOin). •� � IC n R•/ } � 1i ,3; a lol 15 , :, � n I�-.o j'/'JJ1j I6 e g it 7 , li z IQ V d a4: I 19 IL c ^� ; 14 6� 7 4 O, 7-0 C Is 14 ,]t) zz 4 tt is y 17 I g> � 11 , � Q I gal C 49z f"q. rn PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 3 ATTACHMENT 2 1 0 N \ Car �: VN W�f -55 . z0 !, I 0 ® �z5 ® 2 50, 5 S 54 e.G. ® P R3----- - -____ PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 3 ATTACHMENT 2 1 0 N vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area proper-- ties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11: The building would be substantially screened, as defined in Section 36 -27, as viewed from streets or residentially zoned land. 12. The building would not be of lesser quality than surrounding development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated April 12, 1988, unless a change is approved by the City, 2. The property owner shall not be allowed exterior storage of junked vehicles, parts, debris or refuse. 3. Compliance with the screening ordinance, Section 36 -27. Seconded by Counc i lmem*ber- Juker. . Ayes - all, 4 ATTACHMENT 3 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: Endorsed.,_,... TO: City Manager Modified. ,„_ lie ected........ FROM Assistant City Engineer Date SUIBJECT Individual PreSSL(re Reducing Valves, Project 8.9-09-- Award of Bid DATE 1wff May 15, 1989 A tabulation of bids for. the subject project -is attached. The low bid of $0 ,20,4..00 is reasonably close to the estimated c:c:)nstruction cost of $22100o presented in the agenda report of April 21 1989W I:t is recOmmended that the bid be awarded to Aquarius Heating and plumbing, Inca, as shown on the attached resolution is requested that a total project budget of $30 a Further it e s t abli shed . 9000 be BAI jW Attachment TABULATION OF BIDS Pursuant to-due call and notice official � tics thereof , a special meeting designated for a bid opening of the p l ewcacad was convened p `� b y the 8 i t y c, f t h i � at 9 a . m . , May 1 � , 1989. Th meet ing way to receive , open and �' purpose of for construction of individual p p ub � Y c� y read a l ot_td b x d� residential pressure r ' Valves, City Project 89-09., educ�ncg Pr~een l~ were: Br'uc e • Irish , Walter Geissler Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for •the f of 1 owing -b i ds P were opened bids , d -and read BIDDER B III AMOUNT BID. BOND Aquarius Heating & Plumbing, Inc . $23 , X34 . Oo $1161n70 . Benke Plumbing '$29 $1456.50 Pursuant to prior instruction • of the council, the city referred the bids received to c 1 �r� �t o tabulate the city engineer Weer^ i nstr^uct i n ' same and report with his rec om 9 him m �`egul ar city Co�.cnc i 1 meeting mendat i on at the ng of May 18 , 1989 . Meeting 'adjourned at 9:10-am. RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD9 MINNESOTA that the bid of Aquarius Heat ing & Plumbing, Inca in the amc)u- t Of $239234nOo is the lowest responsible bid for the construct nt Of individual pressure reducing valves ion the mayor and clerk are hereby authori City Project e9-09 and into a contract with said bidder for a zed and directed. to 10 nd enter A total project budget of $30 half of the c i city. 1000 is hereby appropriated, �t 1 6 LAW OFFICES BI-?IGGS AND MORGAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Ac.icn by Council;: 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANH BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 66101 r� E5` . ,F "' tr (, r74 .F- • ,� TELEPHONE (M2) 201 -1215 R c e TELECOPI ER (612) 222-4071 Dat e w INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF LEVITT, PALMER, BOWEN, ROTMAN & SHARE April 17, 1989 VIA MESSENGER Mr. Geoff Olson City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Cottages of Maplewood Project Dear Mr. Olson: Attached are two resolutions relating to the Cottages of Maplewood project. g The first resolution rants final approval to the (i) Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1989 (Cottages of Maplewood Project - FBA Insured Mortgage red Mort a e Loan) (the ".Bonds "), (ii) approves certain documents relating to the issuance of the Bonds, and (iii) approves a Development Agreement with Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership relating atin to the tax increment financing component.-of the Cottages of Maplewood project. The second resolution (i) authorizes the issuance of a Multifamily Housing Revenue Note (Cottages of Maplewood Project) and approves Hou 9 (ii) approves the form an the form and details thereof an d ( pp d authorizes the execution of certain related documents in connection with the issuance of the Note. Prior to the council meeting on Thursday, I will forward to Y ou final copies of the attached resolutions. ML I : mg Enc. 2270 MN WORLD TRADE CENTER SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 291 -1215 Very truly yours, Y/Z � I Mary L. Pp e 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK Bl'ILDINO SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 4612) 291 -1215 2400 1 D S C E'," T E R MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5!i402 1912! 330.06 31 591A NOTE RESOLUTION CITY OF MAPLEWOOD $264,000 MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE NOTE, SERIES 1989 (COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT) ADOPTED: April 20, 1989 NOTE RESOLUTION (This Table of Contents is not a part of this Resolution, but is included for convenience only) TABLE OF CONTENTS P age ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS 1 • Section 1 -1 Definitions ......a ............... , 4 .Section 1 -2 • Legal Authorizatlon...••••••••0a• g g 4 .Section 1 -3. F i n d i n s • . . . . • . . . a . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . g Ratifi cation Section 1 -4. Authorization and 6 ofPro'ecta..........a........... ARTICLE Two - NOTE.. 2 Authorized Amount and Form Section -1. 7 - o f Note . . . . . • a . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . 16 Section 2 2. - ' The Initial Note................. . 16 Section 2 -3. Executi .on....•..•.. .............. 16 • Section 2 -4. Delivery of Initial Note.......•• Deli Y 17 Section Sect 2 -5. Disposition of Note Proceeds....* Section 2 -6. Registration of Transfer..•.••••• 17 Section Sec 2 -70 Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed 1 8 Note. a , . . . a a • . • . . . .. • • a . . • . a . . . . • 18 • Section 2 -8. Ownership of Note.......•••••••0• p 19 Section 2 -90 Limitation on Note Transfers***** 19 Section 2 -10 Issuance of New Notes....•••••••• - GENERAL COVENANTS......•.•.•••.•..••• ARTICLE THREE 20 Section 3 -1. Payment of Principal and 20 In t e r e s t . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . • . . . • • a Section on 3 -2 . Performance of and Authority 20 for Covenants....••.•............ Section 3-3. Enforcement and Performance of Covenants ......•••••••••••••••••• 20 21 • Section 3 -4. Nature of Security..••••••••••••• Section 3 -5. Preservation of Tax Exempt Status of the Note. ....•••.••••••••••.• 21 Pacie ARTICLE FOUR - ELLANE4US ....................... .. MISC 23 23 Section 4 -1. Severability.....••••••o ......... 23 Section 4-2. Authentication of Transcript..... Section 4 -3. Registration of Resolution....•.• 9 23 Section 4 -4. Authorization to Execute 23 Ag reements........ ............... SIGNATURES...•••• NOTE RESOLUTION he City BE IT RESOLVED by t Y Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:. ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS 1.1, Definitions, e ein unless the context hereof The terms used h r � meanie s, and shall require otherwise shall have the following 9 the Loan Agreement shall have the an other terms defined ined in g em in the Loan Y 0 'n g , s when used herein as assigned tot same means Agreement, unless the context or use thereof it another or different meaning or intent. Act: the relevant provisions provisions of Minnesota Statutes, . Chapters 462A, 462C and 475, as amended; Bond Counsel: 1: the firm of Briggs and Morgan, • Association, of St . Paul and 14inneapol is , Professional Associa Counsel shall be a written Min ax�c� any opinion of Bond C opinion signed by such Counsel; loan agreement dated as of Bond Loan Agreement: the g . he company executed b and between the City and t P Y May 1,..1989, execu Y proceeds of the Bonds to pursuant t o which the City loans the p finance a portion of the Project Costs; the Company to P famil Housing Revenue Bonds, Bonds: the $2,230,000 multifamily sured of Maplewood Project - FHA In Series 1989 (cottages � -Mort age Loan) issued by the City P ursuant'to the Indenture; g • of Maplewood, IM�.j:= ::c�ta► its successors Cam: the City P and assigns; Code or Internal Revenue Code: the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; of Maplewood lewood Limited Partnership, a Cottages P its success Minnesota limited partnership, ors and assigns, and ntit which any surviving, resulting or transferee business e y g may assume its obligations under the Loan Agreement; Construction Fund. the fund established by the City P ursuant to this Resolution and into which the proceeds of the deposited; Note will be de p Credit. collectively, ectivel , the Initial. Credit issued by Mid America and any Replacement Credit; • agreement of even date herewith, Credit Agreement. the agreem and the Lender, setting forth the by and between the Company edit terms under which the Lender may draw on a Credit; • Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Declaration: the D dated as of May 11 . 1989, executed by the Company and recorded against the Project Premises; • Agreement: the agreement to Disbursing Agre be executed by g the City, P t the Company and Title, relating to the disbursement of the proceeds of the Note from the Construction Fund to pay or reimburse the Company an for the costs of the construction and . installation of the Project-; • 't Date: May 1, 1999 or such earlier date on Final Mature y which he entire Principal Balance of the Note the accrued y a.id and i nterest thereon and any premium are full p discharged; In • c�entu_re . the Indenture of -Trust dated. as of May 1, City 1989 between the and American National Bank and Trust Paul, Minnesota pursuant to which the Bonds i Company, n St. P , are issued; standby Initial Credit. the Y letter of credit issued by Mich America; Lender: Minnesota, its successors and assigns; , in n 'd America Bank Maplewood, Mid America. Mid a state banking � State of oration the Corp organized under the laws of 'the Minnesota; • the $264,000 Multifamily Housing Revenue Note, Note: $ ` Series 1989 (Cottages of Maplewood Project), to be issued by the City pursuant to this Resolution; ent: the agreement to be executed by the .Note Loan Agreem 9 of the Note City nd the Company, providing for the issuance , y proceeds thereof to the Company, including and the loan of the p accordance with any amendments or supplements thereto made in a its provisions, 2 Note Re ister: the records provide for the registration of Note; kept by the City Manager to transfer of ownership of the • t ions : the 1 ans and spec i f icat ions Plans and S ec i f ica P ' ect together for the construction and installation of the Prod , g • 'cations thereof and additions thereto as are with such modifications reasonably a necessary or bl determined by the Company to b desirable for the completion of the Project; • the agreement to be executed by the Pledge Agreement. g its favor of the Lender pledging and assigning city i.n interests • in the Loan Agreement to the Lender; • h of the principal sum on the Principal Balance. so mac. Note as remains unpaid at any time; . it rental apartment Project: that certain 59 unit t facility ro•ect improvements and related imp and equipment (including P • • fired b the Loan Agreement and the .Equipment) which are required Y installed on the A Disbursing to be constructed and Agreement with all additions to, replacements Project Premises, together tut ions for, any o f the foregoing which may be of, and substi made as permitted; , 1 (i) fixtures or tangible Pro ect � ij i ment . any and a 1 the now or herd ter attached or a f f ixe to personal property n . • spec if f ical l excluding any trade fix Project Premises, but sp • ?' n ible ersonal d b tenants , i. f any f(ii) other to g P • tares owned y er located within or used in connection property now or hereafter f t part, from Note P ' ect and acquired, in whole or pa � with the Prod described in Exhibit B proceeds which items are generally d . proce ( t and (iii) any additions to, at tached to the Loan Agreement), ' d substitutions for any of the foregoing replacements of an the Loan Agreement; which may be permitted or required by whi y Pe • the real. property and any other Project Premises. P nd rights described in Exhibit A attached to the easements a rig Agreement; letter of credit provided Replacement Credit: a by the 1 Company pursuant to section 4.07 of the Loan Agreeme nt to replace or supplement a prior Credit; Resolution. this Resolution of the City adopted • with an supplement or amendment April 20, 1989, together Y P thereto; 3 Title: Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company; All references in this instrument to designated "Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the designated Articles Sections and subdivisions of this ins as instrument on s originally executed. The word"herein, "hereof " and "hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to this Resolution as a whole not to any particular Article, Section or subdivision. 1 -2. Leqal Authorization. The a e city is political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized under the Act, to initiate the Project herein referred to, and to issue and sell the Note for ose in the manner and upon the terms and conditions the pure � set forth in the Act and in this Re solution. 1 -3. Findings. The city Council has heretofore determined, and does hereby determine , as follows: 1 the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, its revenue note to Chapter 462C,-.as amended, to issue i • n whole or in art, the costs of a multifamily finance, i p rental housing development (the "Project,,) for the p ublic purposes.expressed in the Act; (2) the Issuer has made the necessary arrangements with Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Company "), for the acquisition, F construction of the Project, which will be installation., and co b of the character and accomplish the purposes provided y the Act; s agreed to issue its $2,230,000 (3) the Issuer ha g of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1989 (Cottages t, M y ) Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) (the Bonds Maplewood Pr � and loan the proceeds thereto to the Company pursuant to the agreement dated as of May 1, 1989 between the terms of a loan g City and the Company (the "Bond Loan Agreement,,) to finance a portion of the costs of the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; (4) the Issuer has also agreed to enter into a revenue agreement with the Company (in the form of the Loan Agreement as hereinafter defined) which provides for the Issuer to 4 ortion of the costs of the acquisition, finance a P ' n and equipping of the Project by making a loan construction ou h the issuance the "Loan to the Company to be funded thr g � ) Series 1969 (Cottages multifamily t i f ami. l Housing Revenue Note, S o€ a Y • In the aggregate principal amount of of Maplewood Project), $264,000 (the "Note"); estimated be necessary to finance the t5) the amount estim : costs of the Project, including the costs and es timated costs permitted by Section i 469.157 of the Act, n addition to the Issuance • e Bonds and other moneys to be contributed by of th an the Com P Y , Note in the will require the issuance of the • principal amount of $264,000 as hereinafter provided; (6) it i s desirable, feasible and consistent with the purposes of the Act to issue the Note, for the objects and purpose e ose of financing a portion of the costs of the Project; (7) under the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Company has agreed to the repayment of the sums borrowed pursuant thereto; (8) in connection with the issuance of the Note and the Bonds t p an he Company will enter. into a Regulatory Agreement y 1 1989 with the Issuer and Bond Trustee (the dated as of May Declaration of "Regulatory Agreement ") and will execute a g May 1 1989 (the dated as of Restrictive Covenants Y , "Declaration ") relating to compliance with certain federal, state and local requirements applicable to the Project; • security for the repayment of (9) to provide additional y the Note, Mid America Bank Maplewood, a state banking corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota • , ha s agreed to issue its Irrevocable Standby Letter g "Initial " Credit,,) of Credit (the Ini to secure the payment of the principal al and interest on the Note; and (10) the Note and the interest accruing thereon do not indebtedness of the City within t constitute an indebt he meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation and do not give rise to a pecuniary liability or a charge constitute or gl P agar q the City against the general credit or taxing powers of y and faith and credit nor the taxing neither the .full ai f g powers of the City is i nterest pledged for the payment of the Note or thereon. 1.4 . Authorization and Ratification of Pro The he has heretofore and does hereby authorize the Comp an y, in accordance with the provisions of the Act and subject to among other things, the terms and conditions set subs g forth in the Disbursing Agreement, to provide for the 'on and installation of the:Project pursuant to the construction b such means as shall be available plans and Sp Y the Company and in the manner determined by the Company, to P Y .and w t advertisement for bids as may be required for the ithou construction and acquisition of municipal facilities; and the City hereby ereb ratifies affirms, and approves all actions heretofore taken b the Company consistent with and in anticipation of such authority and in compliance with the Plans and Specifications. b 2 -1. ARTICLE TWO NOTE Authorized Amount and Form of Note. The Note issued pursuant to this Resolution shall be in substantially the form set forth herein, with such appropriate ro riate variations, omissions and insertions as are permitted or required by this Resolution, and in accordance • • and the total principal with the further provisions hereof; P amount of the Note that may be outstanding hereunder is expr essl y to $ limited 264,000, unless a duplicate Note is Issued pursuant to Section.2 -7. The Note shall be in substantially the following form: 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Multifamily Housing Revenue Note, Series 1989 (Cottages of Maplewood Project) $ FOR VALUE RECEIVED the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Ramsey County, Minnesota, (the "City hereby promises to pay C y, In , Minnesota, its re istered assigns (the "Lender ") , from the successors or g g the rinci al source and in the manner hereinafter provided, p P so AND /100 sum of or so much thereof as remains unpaid DOLLARS ($ )� with interest from time to time ( the "Principal Ba 1 a nc e ) , thereon at the rate of percent m in coin or currency which at the time ( %) per annu y an or times of payment nt is legal tender for the payment of public or private to debts in the United States of America, in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth. 1. The principal of and interest on this Note shall accrue and be payable as follows: (a) Interes t. Interest on the Principal Balance of this Note shall accrue from and after the date of this payable a able on February 1, May 1, August 1 Note and shall Y est and November I of each year, (each an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing on August 1, 19890 (b) P rinci al. Installments of the Principal Balance of the Note shall mature on May It in the years and amounts set forth below: Pa ent Date Amount 1994 $ 1995 1996 1997 1996 1999 2. I n an y event, the payments hereunder shall be • all principal and interest due, as such sufficient to .pay p P principal and -interest becomes due, and to pay any premium or • at maturity, upon redemption, or otherwisee service charge, Y Interest shall be computed on the basis of a 360 day Y ear, but charged for the actual number, of days elapsed in a 365 day year. Princi al and interest and premium, if any, or 3 P any service c g har a due hereunder shall be payable at the • the Lender, or at such other place as the principal office of Lender may designate in writing. Y s issued b the City to provide funds 4. This Note i Agreement dated to be loaned to the Company pursuant to •a Loan x b and between the City and Cottages of as of May 1, 1989► Y M p a lewood Limited Partnership, a Minnesota lim ited hip p artners (the Company ) to assist in the financing of a rental housing project. Use a p • and operation of the Project will be subject to • is and tax covenants contained in a Regula- tory Agreement dated as of May 1, 1989, by and between, among and the Company (the "Regulatory others, the City latory Agreement . P dated as of May 1, and a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Company "Declaration ), whi.ch will 1989, executed by the P Y,requiring be recorded as covenants running with the land and • req g compliance with federal and state requirements similar to those contained in the Regulatory Agreement. This Note is pursuant to and in full compliance with the further issued p , • laws of the State of Minnesota, particularly, Constitution and la Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, and pursuant to a resolution of the City Council du 1 Y i adopted on April 20, 1989 ( the "Resolution"). 5. Capi talized terms used herein shall have the following rt►eaning s and if not defined herein shall have the same m g given iven them in the Dote Resolution or Loan Agreement: 9 A. Bank means Town and Country State Bank of Maplewood, in Maplewood, Minnesota ta or any subsequent P entity, providing a Replacement Credit; B. Credit means the Initial Credit and any Replacement Credit; C* "Credit dit A reement" means the agreement by and between the L ender and the Company, pursuant to which the terms under which the Lender may draw on a Credit are set forth; D, "Initial Credit" means the irrevocable standby letter of credit issued by Town and Country with respect to the vote in an amount equal to the sum of (i) the rinci al amount of the Note,and (ii) 195 outstanding p P days interest thereon; "Replacement Credit" mean E . Rep s a letter of credit re i ssued to lace an existing Credit; and P F. "Town and Country" means Town and Country State ► Bank of Maplewood, a Minnesota state banking corporation; p 6. This Note is secured by a Pledge Agreement of with b the City to the Lender (the even. date here Y y d b Mid America Agreement") and by the Initial Credit issue y g The Company Bank Maplewood, which expires on • 1• accordance with the Loan Agreement, required, in accord t, to provide the Initial the Final Credit or a Replacement Credit, until • e Note in an amount equal to the sum of (i) Maturity Date of the (ii) at outstanding al Balance o ) the outst 9 and Principal f the Note, ( P least 195 days interest thereon. The Initial Credit or any be laced upon satisfaction of the Replacement Credi t may replaced stated in the Loan Agreement* onditions therefore The Lender s ement Credit upon may draw on the Initial Credit or any Replac forth in.the Credit Agreement the terms set for t dated as of May 1, Lender (the executed b the Company in favor of t 1989, execu Y P "Credit Agreement")* The proceeds of the Note are to be Construction Fund. established placed in the Constr d pursuant to the Reso lution.and the Disbursing Agreement (h ereinafter referred disbursement of the proceeds o to }, and the disbur f this Note from and conditions the Cotlstruction Fund is subject to the terms Agreement of even date herewith among the "of a Disbursing Ag Title Insurance t tie Company and Commonwealth Land T City, P Company (the Disbursing Agreement")* P M] The City, for itself, its successors and . 7. T y. • waives demand, presentment, protest and notice assigns, hereby law, the Lender of dishonor; and to the.extent permitted by , interest and/or principal of or any service charge may extend inter / P • Y his Note including the Final Maturity or premium due on t � art liable Date, all without notice to or consent of any party D ' without releasin any such party from hereon or thereon and wl g suit thereof the such liability ' and whether or not as a re interest • ote is no longer exempt from the federal on the .Note g _income tax, . In no event, however, may the Final Maturity Date beyond thirty be extended beyo y years from the date hereof. 8. This Note may not be prepaid prior to May i1, 1993. Beginning y on May 1 1993, this Note may be prepaid n p whole, but not in art on May 1, 1993 upon payment of a • percent 2 The premium for prepayment shall premium of two pert ( ) � er, Beginning ease one percent (1 %) on each May 1 thereaft g . .decrease P 95 this Note may be prepaid in whole but not in with. May 1, 19 , part, without premium. • also subject to prepayment, without 9. This Note is subject 'm to the extent that there are any surplus sums held in p rem 1 u, the Constructio n as provided rovided under Section 6 of the Disbursing Agreement. the event of repayment of this Note, the 10 . In P applicable hall apply an such prepayment against Lender s PP Y •Y st the accrued interest repayment premium , i f any, then again • P Balance and finally against the final on the Principal B a inci al amounts due under the Note. The monthly payments ants pr p h 1 hereof, shall continue to be due and due under paragraph Principal Balance and accrued in full until the entire Pri p payable ave been aid regardless of any partial interest on this Note h P prepayment made hereunder.,/ 'n the Resolution and subject to 11. As provided i certain limitations set forth therein, this Note is only at the office of the the books of the City transferable upon his agent duly b the Lender in person or by hi g Manager, • y• the Lender's expense, upon surrender authorized in writing, at hereof together with a written instrument of transfer • the Manager, duly executed by the Lender or satisfactory to g its duly authorized agent. Upon such transfer far the Manager e of registration and the name and address of will note the date 9 � blank appearing e new registered owner in the registration pP the g below. The City may deem and treat the person n whose name Y i registered upon the books of the City with the Note is last rag P g such registration noted on the Note, as the absolute owner 11 hereof, whether or not overdue, for the purpose of receiving .payment of or on the account, of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to the Lender.or upon his order a shall be valid and effective to satisfy and discharge the 1 iabilit Y upon on the Note to the extent of the sum or sums so paid, and y the City shall not be affected by any notice to the . contrary. 12 All of the agreements, conditions, covenants, p provisions and sti ulations contained in the Resolution, the Loan Agreement, reement the Pledge Agreement, the Credit Agreement, the Regulatory Agreement, the Decla ration and the Disbursing ent are hereby made a part of this Note to the same Agreement y effect as if the were extent and with the same force and of f y fully set forth herein* 13, This Note and interest thereon and any service charge or premium due hereunder are payable solely f rom the revenues a proceeds roceeds derived from the Loan Agreement and � Credit Agreement, reement and do not constitute a debt of the City ' within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory • re not payable from or a charge upon any funds limitation, a P y d ed to the payment other than the revenues and proceeds pledged .p ym c�do not -- -iv-e --rise to -a _pe -cuni ary -- l iabi_l -i -ty of the _ t lere�, an 9 of of its Cit y or, to the extent permitted by la w, any office rs agents or employees, and no molder of this Note a g exercise of the taxing have the right to compel any shall ever 9 e interest thereon, or over of the City to pay this Dote or the P thereof against any property of the City, to enforce payment g and this Note does not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, g or legal equitable, upon any property of the g • City, and the agreement of the City to perform or cause . the performance of the covenants and other provisions herein referred to shall • hall be subject at all times to the availability � uch purpose in of revenues or other funds furnished for , s. p p the Loan Agreement, sufficient to pay all accordance with g costs of such performance or the enforcement t hereof. t is agreed that time is of the essence of 1 . I g • Event of Default t as that term is defined in this Note. If an the Loan Agreement) shall occur, then the Len der shall have the right and option to declare, without prior notice of any he Principal Balance and accrued interest thereon, kind, t P immediately ue and payable, whereupon the same, p lus any y service charges, shall be due and payable, but premiums or s g solely from sums made available under the L oan A g reement, the Credit Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement. Failure to 12 • all not constitute a waiver exercise such option at any time shall of the right to exercise the same at any subsequent time* he Lender, as provided herein 15. The remedies of t Pledge Agreement the Loan Agreement, g and in the Credit Ag � are not exclusive and Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, in 1 Ag pursue s cumulative and concurrent and may be singly, shall be cumul discretion of the successively or together, at the sole su Y exercised as often as occasion therefor Lender, and may be exerci n such right or shall .occur; and the f allure to exercise any i release n no event be construed as a waiver or r remedy shall thereof* t be deemed, by any 16. The Lender shall no act of hts or • commission, to have waived any of its rig omission or • such waiver is in writing and signed remedies hereunder unless s ecif icall set and then only to the extent specifically by the Lender with reference to one event f orth in the writing A waiver wi l. continuing or as a bar to or waiver shall not be construed as c 9 of any right or remedy as to a subsequent event. been issued without registration 17. This Note has b istration suant to .under state or federal or . other securities , laws, .pur • such issuance and accordingly the Note may an exemption for su or transferred in whole or, part,. nor may a not be assigned • • interest in the Note be given pursuant to any . participation inter accordance with an participation agreement, except in. 'cements* able exemption from such registration requl aPPlic P • at the obligations ions o f the 18. It is recognized that provided in Company are non-recourse obligations to the extent Section 6.08 of the Loan Agreement. CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all I T I S HEREBY C t happen and be • ired to exist, conditions, acts and things requ t to or in the issuance of this Note o performed preceden PP exist, ed in regular and have happened and have been performed due form as required by law. 13 EOF the city has caused this Note to IN WITNESS WHER � y uses of the be duly executed in its name key the manual signat and has caused the corporate seal to be Mayor and Manager • d has caused this Note to be dated May 1, affixed hereto, an 19890 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Mayor Attest: Manager e .(SEAL) 14 PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the unpaid this Note and the interest accruing tl the books of the City of Maplewood in last noted below. Date of Name and address Re 9 istration Registered Owner 1989 15 Principal Balance of hereon is registered on the name of the holder ,Signature of Manager 2 -2. The Initial Notee dated as of the date o The .Note shall be f delivery, 1 bear .shall be payable at the times and in the manner, shal Interest at the r • ate and shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as are set forth therein. 2 -3. Execution, executed on behalf f o f the City by The Note shall be execu sealed. res of its Mayor and Manager an the. signatures d shall be y with the seal of the City. In case any officer whose all appear on the Note s signature sh PP hall cease to be such officer before the delivery-of the Note, such signature shall lid and sufficient for nevertheless be valid all purposes, the fiver In the same as if had remained in office until. del y absence or disability of the Mayor or the. Manager event o f the ab ' on o f the City ty sucil of fivers of the City as, in the opi.ni. • act Attorney, may act in their behalf, shall without further a • the City Council execute and deliver the or authorization of y Note. 2 -4. Delivery of Initial Note. Before delivery of the Note there shall be filed. with the Lender (except to the extent waived by the Lender) the following items:. (1) an executed copy of each of the following documents: (A) the Loan Agreement; (B) the Pledge Agreement; (C) the Initial Credit; (D) the Credit Agreement; (E) the Disbursing Agreement; (F) the Regulatory Agreement; (G) the Declaration; (21 an opinion of Counsel for the Company as prescribed by Bond Counsel; 16 opinion of Bond Counsel as to the validity an � 3 ) the tax exempt status of the Note; (4) such other documents and opinions as Bond Counsel may reasonably require for purposes of rendering its opinion required in subsection (3) above or that the Lender may reasonably require for the closing. 2 -5. Disposition of Note Proceeds. {1} There is hereby established a Construction Fund to be held d b Title as a separate account of the City as provided in the Disbursing Agreement. Upon delivery of the Note to Lender, the proceeds of the Note shall be credited to on Fund held b Title on behalf. of the City, at the Constructs y which time the entire principal amount of th e Note shall be advanced, and Title shall, on behalf of the City, deemed a disburse funds from the Construction Fund for payment of on receipt of such supporting documentation as Project Costs up P udin compliance with Title may deem reasonably necessary, incl g. P T y the provisions. of the Disbursing Agreement. Title or the 'de the City Company shall prove Y with a full accounting of all .funds disbursed for Project Costs. p {2} Any surplus in the Construction Fund shall be • re a ent of the Note as provided in the applied towards the Ym p p to produce a Disbursing greement and shall not be invested .p g • than the yield on the Note, as required by yield greater Y Internal Revenue Service Revenue Procedure 79-5, Revenue 81 -22 and 26 CFR 601.201 {and any subsequent Procedure rov i ded . P amendments, modifications or replacements thereof); • receives an opinion of Bond Counsel that that, i f the Lender the exemption nterest on the tion from federal income taxation of e jeopardized,, the surplus funds may be Notes will not b in vested at a yield greater than the yield on the Note. 2 -6. Registration of Transfer. The City wi ll cause to be kept at the office of the Register in which, subject Manager a Note Regi to such reasonable s provide for regulations as it may prescribe, the City shall P the registration of transfers of ownership of the Note, The initially registered in the name of the Lender Note shall be i g the Lender and shall be transferable upon the Note Register by in person or by its agent duly authorized in writing, upon together with a written instrument of surrender of the _Note g b transfer satisfactory to the Manager, duly e xecuted Y the authorized agent. The following f orm of . Lender or its duly aut g assignment shall be sufficient for said purpose. 17 j For value received hereby sells,. assigns and transfers un o the within Note of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer said-Note on . tine books of said City with full. F ower of substitution in the premises* . The undersigned certifies that the transfer be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 2 -90 Dated: Registered owner transfer the Manager shall note the date of Upon such trap g e new Lender in the. registration and the name and address of th No g Note Register and in the registration blank appearing on the Note. 2 -7. Mutilated Lost or Destroyed Note. I n case any Note issued hereunder shall become • destroyed or lost, the City s mutilated or be destr hall, if not then y prohibited b law, cause to be executed and delivered, a new • outstanding amount, number and tenor in Note of like outstandi g principal exc ha n g e and substitution for and upon cancellati on of such • in 1 ieu of and in substitution for such mutilated Note, or Lender's paying the Note destroyed or lost, upon the Len p Y g expenses and charges of the City in connection reasonable expen g therewith, and in the case of a Note destroy ed or lost, the • evidence satisfactory to the City with flying with the City o f e or • satisfactory actor to it. If the mutilated, destroyed • • Indemnity Y s already matured or been called for redemption In lost Note ha y accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to Issue a new Note prior to payment. 2 -8. Ownership of Note. The city m i. y it a deem and treat the person in whose name the Note • s bast registered in the Note Re inter and by 9 e Note whether or not such notation on the h Note shall be ote for the urpose of overdue, as the absolute owner of such N P receiving payment of or on account of the Principal Balance, ym redemp tion p rice or interest and for all other purposes City whatsoever, and the shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary. 18 2 -9 . L imitation on Note Transfers . been issued without registration under The Note has be exemption -for state or other securities laws, pursuant to an - • and .accordingly ly the Note may not be assigned or such issuance, g • r art nor may aaparticipation interest transferred in whole o p , n ursuant to any participation agreement, in the Note be given p • e exemption f from such in accordance with an app Zicabl except registration requirements. 2_10, Issuance of New Notes, s of Section 2 - Subject to the provision 2-9r the City . issue a new shall, at the request and expense of the Lender, din rindequal to that principal amount eq note, in aggregate outstanding P P o f the Note surrendered, and of like tenor except as to registered in the name o principal amount and f the Lender or such transferee as may be designated by the L ender. 19 ARTICLE THREE GENERAL COVENANTS 3 1 • Payment of Principal_ and Interest. The City covenants that it. will promptly pay or Th y aid the principal of and interest on the Nate at c ause to be P the place, on the dates solely from the source and in the • Y acid r rovided he and in the Note. The principal manner p • e payable solely from and secured . by revenues an Interest ar p y proceeds derived from the Load Agreement, the Pledge Credit Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, Agreement, the Cre g which revenues and proceeds are hereby sp ec i f ica 11 Y .pledged to • manner and to the extent specified the payment thereof in ent the the Note the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, In � d the Credit Agreement; and nothing in Disbursing Agreement an considered as the Note or in this Resolution shall be con • assigning, pledging or otherwise encumbering any other funds or assets of the City. 3 - 2. Performance of and Authority for Covenants. The Clay covenants that it will faithfully perf orm • covenants, undertakings, stipulations at all times any and all and provisions ions i contained in this Resolution, n t he Note and delivered hereunder and n all executed i authenticated • that it is proceedings n g s of the City Council pertaining g thereto; der the Constitution duly authorized under and laws of the State without limitation the Minnesota including particularly and °f pledge the revenues t to issue the Note authorized hereby, p g Ac Agreement in the manner and to the extent and assign the Loan set forth Loan Agreement and in this Resolution, the Note, the g the Pledge Agreement; , • that all action on its part for the issuance • e Note and for the execution of the and delivery thereof has been duly and effectively taken; and that the Note e Lender is and will be a valid and in the hands of the the city according enforceable s Y en f orc special limited obligation of P to the terms thereof. 3-3. Enforcement and Performance of Covenants. g The City agrees to enforce all covenants and • Company under the Loan Agreement and obligations of the C p Y ender and being Disbursing Agreement, upon request of the L Dlsbu 9 g all indemnified to the satisfaction of the Authority for aall expenses and claims arising therefrom, and to perform P other rovisions pertaining to the City covenants and ent and the Disbursing contained in the Note, the Loan Agreem 4 hereof. subject to the provisions of Section 3 _ Agree�ne nt , s u • � 3 -4. Nature of Security. • 'n anything contained in the Note, the Notwithstanding Y g Credit Agreement, eement the Disbursing Agreement,.th e Loan Agreement or an other document referred. Agreement, , the Pledge Y o f the , 9 -4 to the contrary, under the provisions to in Section 2 be a charge upon any the Note may not be payable,,from or g tic t , �' • than the revenues and proceeds pledged funds of the City other th ' ect to an to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subs y • nor shall the Note otherW1Se contribute or .liability thereon, give prise to a pecuniary liability of � the City or, to the extent permitted es tted b law, any of the City s officers, employees have the right of the Note shall ever and agents. No holder y the City to compel an exercise of the taxing power of Y to pay e interest thereon, or to the Note or the enforce payment other than the thereof against any property of the City e g the Pledge Agreement; and the Not revenues pledged under g , g legal or shall not constitute a.charge, lien or encumbrance, • t of the City; and the Note shall equitable, upon any property • debt of the City within the meaning of any not constitute a de t nothing in the Act constitutional or statutory limitation; bu g s of the Lender to enforce the covenants made impairs the right he for the security thereof as provided in this Resolution, t • Pledge Agreement, the Credit Agreement, Loan Agreement, the 9 g• d b authority of the Disbursing Agreement and in the Act, an Y herein the Act the City has made the covenants and agreements Lender; provided that in any event, the for the benefit o f the Lend P versants and f the City to perform or enforce the co .agreement o Y Note the Loan Agreement, other provisions contained in the r 1 be P and th Disbursing Agreement, shat the Pledge Agreement .e of revenues under the subject at all times to the availability nce su � nt to a a31 costs of such performance Loan Agreement sufficient pay not be subject cement thereof, and the City shall or the enforcement to any personal or pecuniary liability thereon. 3 -5. Preservation of Tax Exempt Status of the Note. reserve the tax (1} 1n order to p exempt status of y that it shall take such actions the City covenants the Note, as are required and within its r easonable control to prevent ederal e Note from becoming taxable for f the interest on th p oses for the owners there of (other than any purposes income tax P • �� 'al user" or "related person thereto" owner who is a ,substantial ode including but the meaning ) within g of Section 146 of the C 21 f it under Section not limited t g o taking all actions required o R .148 of the Code To this end, the City shall: (A) cause the Company to maintain records , a to the Note, the • "gross roceeds" attributable • identifying all g P are invested, any arbitrage d at which such gross proceeds yield earnings derived .from the an profit derived therefrom, and y. . investment of such arbitrage profit; • on file all annual B) make and maintain • f the amount, if any, of exce ss arbitrage determinations ion s o required to be rebated to the United States; d States at least once .every C) rebate to the un ite d to be rebated • amount, if any, which is require f lve years ( the am, ► lment which the last insta to the United States, including a shall be made no later than 60 days after the day an which the Note is paid in full; . (n) not Invest "gross proceeds" in any acquired otherwise so as to deflect•arbitrage nonpurpose obligations �� rohibited payment to a to the United States as a p ..payable third party; • tin an ''gross proceeds E) ref rain from investing y obligations at a _ uired nonpurpOSe allocable to the Note - -in • ac to to the extent such ' in excess of the yield on the No 150 of yield year more than proceeds exceed in any calendar y calendar gross P is for the Note in that cal the debt service requi.remen year; and • all records of the annual (F) retain on file ears after he rebate amount until six (6) Y determination of t the retirement of the Note•, 22 ARTICLE FOUR MISCELLANEOUS 4 -1. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution shall be held or deemed to be or shall, in fact, be inoperative or unenforceable as applied in any particular case in any • or jurisdictions or in all jurisdictions or in jurisdiction all cases because it conflicts with any ,provisions of any • atute or rule or public policy, or for any constitution or .statute circumstances shall other reason, such ll not have the effect of rende rin g the P • provision in question inoperative or n other case or circumstance, • or of • unenforceable in any • vision or provisions herein contained rendering any other pro P tent whatever. invalid inoperative, or unenforceable to any ex s P • n one or more phrases, sentences, clause The invalidity of any or paragraphs in this Resolution contained shall not affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. 4 -2. Authentication of Transcri to I City directed to furnish to The officers of the C Y are all of ied copies of this Resolution and Bond Counsel cer P vets or certificates documents referred to herein, and affida as to all other matters which are reasonably necessary to • • validity of the Note. All such certified copies, evidence the vale heretofore Y certificates and affidavits, including any • constitute recitals of the City as to the furnished, shall con correctness of all statements contained t herein. 4_3. Re istration of Resolution. is authorized and directed to cause The City Manager the Count Auditor a copy of this Resolution to be filed with Y from said County Auditor a and to obtain fr of Ramsey County, . certificate that the Note as a bon d of the city has been duly entered upon his bond register. 4-4. Authori zat ion to Execute Agreements . Loan Agreement, the Pledge The forms of the proposed a roved in d the Disbursing Agreement, are hereby pp Agreement an g substantially ubstantiall the form heretofore present ed to the City Council, toget • her with such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, 23 om and additions there deletions therefrom to as may be necessary. riot to the appropriate and approved by Bond Counsel p e and and the Mayor and Manager of th execution of the . documments , y the Pledge • 'zed to execute the Loan Agreement, g City are authorized ent In the name of and on Agreement and the Disbursing Agreem and Counsel 9 city and such other documents as.B behalf of the Y issuance of the consider appropriate in connection with the issuaof the Mayor vent of the absence Y Note.. In the e or disability e City as, in the opinion of or the Manager such officers of th Y out • may act in their behalf, shall wit the City Attorney, Y City Council do all things further act or authorization of the Y e done • ents and document and execute all rostrum s required to b f f icers . The executed b ore Y such absent or disabled o • ' nstrun�ent b the appropriate officer or execution of any i Y d sh all be conclusive .officers of the City herein authorize evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof . Attest: Manager Adopted: April 20, 19 8 9 Mayor of the City of Maplewood 24 591A Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular City meeting of the Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly 1 held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 24th day of August, 1989, at o 'clock P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1989 TO FINANCE A PROJECT AND PROGRAM THEREFORE AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH . (COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT -- FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN) The motion for the adoption of the ' foregoing duly seconded b member , and resolution was d y Y upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor. thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon, said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 1989 TO FINANCE A PROJECT AND PROGRAM THEREFORE AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT -- FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN) BE IT RESOLVED D b the Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council has previously received a proposal f Maplewood Limited Partnership, a.Minnesota from Cottages o ,limited p artnership (the �� Company ") tha t the City Of Maplewood multifamily (the City) undertake a Y housing development the costs of a certain to finance a portion of program residential rental project ' t as herein described, pursuant to "Act" , through the ) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the seance • 0 ' b the City of its 52,23 000 Multifamily Housing , is Y gg lCottages Revenue Bonds, Series 19 . of Maplewood Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) (the "Bonds " ) and in accordance with a Bond Purchase Agreement .the "Bond Purchase Agreement" . n and Juran and Moody, Inc. between the City and the Company, (the "Bond Purchaser "). 2, The Company desires to construct on certain t an real estate owned by I ' d located in the city, a 59 -unit • facility "Project "). The multi housing rental f Y mu1 Y w and moderate income rovide rental housing to to . Project well p derl ersons. and will persons (as described below) and to el y P 'cies and urposes of the Act. 0 therwise further the poli P P ublic hearings on the Project and the financing program City Council on December 14, therefor were duly held by the C y . 1987 a findings made in the and November 14, 1988. The this City Council on Preliminary Resolution adopted by Drell Y e ' Pro ect , the Bonds and 14 1987 with respect to th � December , the Note are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved. 3. It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan ment to be .dated as of May 1, 1989, between the city as Agree and .the Company as Borrower (the "Loan Agreement "), the Lender C y it loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to finance I • The Basic Payments to be ' . n p art the costs of the Project e Loan Agreement are fixed so as ma y de b the Company under the g a to produce revenue sufficient t o pay the principal of, purchase price of , the • if any, interest on, and the P premium, Y Bonds when due. It is further proposed that the City assign • is and certain other rights its rights to the Basic Payments under the Loan Agreement to American National Bank and Trust • association located in St.Paul, company, a national banking associ Minnesota (the Trustee ") as security for payment of the Bonds under an Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1, 1989 between the City and the Trustee (the "Indenture ")• I!PZ 4. T he operation and occupancy of the Project will be subject to the terms and conditions of a Regulatory May , Ma 1 1989 .Agreement dated as of , between the City, the Re ulator Trustee and the Company (the "Regulatory Y Agreement ") and a • Covenant "Declaration ") dated Declaration of Restrictive Cov executed b as of May 11 1989, e Y the Company and recorded as d restrictions running with the land on which the Project i s to be located. The Bond Proceeds loaned pursuant to the Doan. Agreement will be used to fund a mortgage loan to finance the acquisition, construction installation and i n of the Project, which mortgage loan will be insured by the Federal Housing Administration ("FRA") of the Department of Housing United States 9 and Urban Development 1, HUD ) { as further described in the official. Statement (as defined belo w ) and to fund a reserve fund. �. The City and the Company will enter into a Development Agreement dated,as of April 1, 1989 (the " Agreement") relating Development Agree ) 9 to certain tax increment • assistance to be ranted by the City to the Project* financing assists g 6. This Council, i 1 • , by action taken on December 14, inar approval (the .,Preliminary Resolution") 1987, gave prelim y pp proposal to ro the osal for the Project and the financing program Housing therefor. The 9 Finance Agency has given o ram for the Project by approval to the proposed financing pr 9 -3- issuing its nonrejection letter under the Act. The City obtained allocation of Bonding Authority pursuant to Chapter 474A.091 on or about November 28, 1988 and filed a Carry- forward Election for such allocation on December 22, 1988 under Section 146(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The findings of the City Council of the City made in the Preliminary Resolution with respect to the Project are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved. 7. Forms of the following documents relating to the Bonds have been submitted for review to the City Attorney and to the City Council for approval: (a) the Loan Agreement; (b) the Indenture; (c) the Regulatory Agreement; (d) the Declaration (not executed by the City); (e) the Bond Purchase Agreement; (f) the Development Agreement; and (g) The Preliminary Official Statement (not executed by the City). g. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) the Project described in the Loan Agreement and Indenture referred to above constitutes a -4- • b the Act and the financing program Project authorized y ) for the Project is authorized by the Act; (b) the purpose of the Project and the • or the ' financing program f Project is, and the will be to effect thereof P romote the public nstruction welfare by the co , installation and • equipping of a rental housing facility for assisting persons of low income and elderly Y persons within the Cit to obtain decent, safe and sanitary housing sin at rentals they can afford; (c) the Project is to be located within the City , 't limits at a site which is easily persons residing accessible to g within the City and the surrounding communities; (d) the construction and installation of the Project, the issuance and sale of the and deliver b Bonds, the execution a Y Y the City of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Regulatory Purchase Agreement, the Bond P Agreement and the g g Development Agreement (collectively, the and the "Agreements"), a performance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Agree ments , and of all other acts and things required under the constitution and laws of the -5- State of Minnesota to make the Agreements and the Bonds valid and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are authorized by j the Act; (e) it is desirable that the Company be authorized, in accordance with the provisions of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement, the Regulatory Agreement and the Declaration (which terms and conditions the city determines to be necessary, desirable and proper), to construct and install the Project by such means as shall be available to the Company and in the manner determined by the Company, and with or without advertisement for bids as required for the acquisition and installation of municipal facilities; (f) it is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture; (g) the Basic Payments under the Loan Agreement are fixed to produce revenues sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal of, premium, if any, interest on, and the purchase price of, the Bonds issued under the Indenture when due, and the Loan Agreement, Regulatory Agreement, Declaration and Indenture also provide that the Company is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project Premises (as defined in the Indenture) and ;sayable during the term of the Loan Agreement, Regulatory Agreement, Declaration and Indenture; and (h) under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.07, and as provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from or charged upon any funds other than the revenues pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any liability thereon; no holder of any Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay any of the Bonds or the interest or premium thereon, or to enforce -7- payment thereof against any property of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, 1 ien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, on an itable u property of the City Y .except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds shall recite that the Bonds are issued without moral obligation on the P art of the state or its political subdivision s , and that the Bonds, including • hereon are payable solely from the Interest thereon, P Y reven ues pledged led ed to the payment thereof; and the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City or Its political subdivision within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 9. The Y e City hereby elects to have Section 142(d)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended {requiring that 40 • percent or more of the rental units in the Project be occupied by tenants whose units in the Project be occupied by tenants whose income is 60 percent or less of or a for family median gross income (adjusted Y size) apply to the Bonds. 10 Subs P Subject to the approval of the City Attorney � . hereof, provisions of paragraph 14 h , the forms of the a nd the and all other. documents Agreements and exhibits thereto g . are approved substantially in described In paragraph 7 hereof pP the office o f the City the form submitted and on file in • s as may Mana er, with such subsequent change Y be approved by 9 • Attorney. The Agreements, in the city and the City A y • substantially the form submitted, are directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the or city Manager. Any other documents and certificates necessary ' to the transaction herein describ ed shall be executed by the icers. Copies of all of the documents appropriate City. of f P necessary to the transaction herein described shall be s ided herein and in the delivered, filed and recorded a p rov -Loan Agreement and Indenture. iI. The City hereby authorizes the use and . her y circulation by the Bond Purchaser of an official Statement in e of the Bonds. The City connection onnecton with the offer and sal hereby finds that the informati on contained in the section of the Preliminary official Statemen t captioned "the Issuer" does not contain any untrue statement and hereby approves in Cit substantially the form submitted to the .Council at this City .Council Y meeting such information for inclusion in the official • ratifies, State and the City hereby ratlf , �conf isms and consents St M-Z a to the use of said section in the official Statement in connection with the sale of the Bonds* The City has not .prepared nor made any independent investigation of the Preliminary information contained in the Pr Y Official Statement captioned "the Issuer") and (other than the section therein captl � .takes no responsibility for such information. 12. The Bonds shall be bear interest at a rate or rates, not to exceed tee percent (10%) p er annum established aser, and the Pricing Committee Y b the Company, the Bond Purch , hereinafter referred to. There 'is hereb Y appointed a Pricing Committee to which is hereby delegated ated the power and authority g to agree with the Company an d Bond Purchaser on the interest rates for each maturity. . The Mayor and City Manager are a y Pricing Committee, with hereby ointed by the City to the Fr g PP full power and authority to bind the City, .subject to the limitations stated herein. 13. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture. The Bonds shall mature on the dates as set forth In the Indenture. The offer of the Bond Purchaser to purchase percent ( $ ) o f their the Bonds at p principal amount, plus ac ---- crued interest to the date of delivery is hereby accepted. ted. The Mayor and City Manager are �. P authorized and directed to prep are and execute the Bonds as -10- prescribed in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication and delivery to the.Bond Purchaser. Mayor and City 14 . The y Y Manager and other 't appropriate officers of the City are authorized and directed to .prepare and furnish to the B and Purchaser certified copies • s of the City of all proceedings and record Y relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be • ts. relating to the legality of the required to show. the f ac g Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the • control or as otherwise known to them; officers custody and co and all such certified copies, cert-if icates and of f idavits , including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute Y ns of the City s to the truth of all statements representatio Y contained therein. 15. The approval hereby given to the Agreements and • documents referred to in paragraphs 7 and 10 the various other �iacum above includes approval of (a) su ch additional details therein as may be nec essar y PP and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be nd a necessary and appropriate proved by Bond Counsel, the p P City Attorney and the City off icials authorized herein to execute said documents prior rior to their execution and (b) such additional documents, agreement s or certificates as may be necessary and appropriate ro riate in connection with the Agreements -11- and with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and approved by City officials authorized 8 and Counsel, the City Attorney and y prior ,to their execution; and herein to execute said documents p are hereby authorized to said City Attorney and City officials • ' approve said changes or additional documents, agreements or PP 't The execution of any certificates on behalf of the City* instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval n accordance of such documents i with the terms thereof and inabilit hereof . In the absence (or Y ) of the Mayor or City . of' the or city Manager, any of the doc uments authorized by this resolution to be exec y executed b them may be executed by the Acting Mayor or the Ac tin city Y Manager, respectively@ understood and a 16. It is enders reed that the Company g shall indemnify the City against all liabilities, losses, ' attorney's fees and dama es, costs and expenses (including damages, arising with respect to the P ex enses incurred by the City) ) -12- I J t .- as p rovided. for and agreed to by and Project or the Bonds, • Agreement and the between the Company and the City in th e Loan 9 � Bond Purchase Agreement. Passed: April 20, 1989 Mayor Attest City Mayor 0 -13- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY - -CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ned being I, the undersigned, g the duly qualified and City Clerk of the City Council of the City I of Maplewood, Minnesota, 00 HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached • minutes with the original thereof on and f oregoing extract of m e same is a full, true and file in my office, and that the of a meeting of the City complete transcript of the menu Council of said City duly called an d held on the date therein • minutes relate to the authorization indicated, insofar as such m of the issuance of the �2�230, Q00 Multifamily Mortgage Revenue - Bonds (Cottages of Maplewood Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan), Series 19890 WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of 1989-o (SEAL) City Clerk -14- AGENDA ITEM '-- a AGENDA REPORT Action by Councils Endorsed--.- TO: City Manager Modified ------- 1W ]Rej ecte FROM: Assistant City Engineer Date SUBJECT « Hillcrest Trunk Sanitary Sewer, Project' "86--2^- - Revise Assessment Roll DATE: May 15, 1989 ,I-he notice - o+ assessment for PIN 24-29-22-22-0017 was allegedly .not. received by the current property owner due to problems in recording the title of the inherited property. The notice was correctly mailed according to Ramsey County records and is not the responsibility of the city. However, the current owner questioned the applicability of two unit charges for the property which has frontage of 140.8 feet. Copies of the assessment map and notices are attached for reference. Although this is the same assessment used under the Water Service District 6 Improvement, Project 86-03, it does not seem appropriate, it is recommended that the assessment for PIN .2.4-29-22-22-0017 and the parcel immediately to the south, PIN 24- 29-22-22-0016, be reduced to a single sanitary sewer unit each. FAA iw Attachments �- - - -- � l _�� a l - -- -- a l_ ._._ a l ___ • t - - ----- ti t__, _.. � t. .._ rs l _ a l � ► Q � .� ► rr � rr � - r r r� �Ir � fir: rl i■r rr' rr rr � � ■r � � • �t ■r �r rr rr rr rl� r �---- 3 3 `•_ �� ` • 99 .0 �c 9� 'c Ja` r �� at- yy )Z t0 '!� ' ' %�. id= 8� •Q' 7S' )' �!7 02: �' ��1 J 1 w �' ��. : 3i " }; (, • J j .♦ := f«_ �� %5� 3 i ('�� z1 w �^ Q ��; 1 I + C 4-0) ` � `O w` 2 o O it Z ? 2.. v 71 r - r ' z� 299 « (� p99t�5 O r M ``-_- p — — - — — — — - s.a'7 qC . mgr r i s, C�_j 4 0.1 /}. s 1 3 a .4l' D�rwA4o - H. ' h• X54) r 1- -1 299 •e 4 12i r /7t tai) •i. iv �1 !I 5 � S 4 3 2 - S - - - - - - - - ---- �-_ 4 a" 'e _ tit • % - js�) ' (s4) a t � t � t y4 i i� Ila Its C� J E IDAHO � DI 4j 3) j r to -liposd I)o loo ao 2 _ • 1 S fit• ♦� 5! fo' ' .t,L ZJ C i 1�� ♦ w , a Mb t r ?o z 0 C-I'S 6) 0. ' � 2 ��) � ._ - _. 7 0. (� r) Lj,� (r1) � s -� iTS,,� ° � � i 4 w � ;, Z ...g IA* • Iu s /le of v A LIMA_ (7)) C r (4 4)) & 2 ., W 2 1 0 Cj �I 0 j , ' (act (. Ill •l) � � : 1 f - i 0 •c.. 1 [, � IC IQ •ii + is* " 1 •4 As.9 r2. - f ' ♦ oV� is1� w - o .. 31AA4. 3 3 coo) : •� �:" C�'� o vs v oto - 299 ��' Qr 10� '�. • v -4 0 % 44 •• . •G. !+J 14 +• tc; tic r T *?4 sS 14540 f jr' E.GMT• cc N o. X11 7-j .3 ,& 4. 1 2 :' _ _ �AI 4 �..> >..�_ `` C+1 /zl �rl �S� ASSESSMENT MAP PROJe 86 -22 HILLCREST TRUNK SEWER scat. • N/A Date: !x/24/89 i MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAML s HILL 86-22 IMPROVEMENT NO 5717 PINS ID am 24 29 22 22 0017 JUSEPH JUHN SIMON ETAL 1579 MYRTLE ST PAUL MIN 551193128 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO4 —60 NIELSENIS GARDEN LOTS LUT 9 BLK 2 N 0 T I. C E 0 F P E N D I N G P U B L C I M P R 0 V E M E N T MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAML s HILL 86-22 IMPROVEMENT NO 5717 PINS ID am 24 29 22 22 0017 JUSEPH JUHN SIMON ETAL 1579 MYRTLE ST PAUL MIN 551193128 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO4 —60 NIELSENIS GARDEN LOTS LUT 9 BLK 2 ' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS F.= P%J -r F= IcE; E3 FEE E; E3 M EE t*%i -T- [>/P MO. 5717 PROJECT NO, 86-22 HILLCREST TRUNK SEWER THIS IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS CONCERNING THIS ASSESSMENT AS STATED ON THE ATTACHED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING~ ' YOUR ASSESSMENT FOR PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 24-29-22-22-0017 IS AS FOLLOWS ... SANITARY SEWER UNITS AT*�0"'00.000 EACH =******$600.00 *********0.600 SANITARY SEWER FFAT .***$30.000 . EACH =********$0.00 *********0°000 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AT **$455.000 EACH = ********$0.00 *********0.000 WATER MAIN F.F. AT ' ***$30.000 EACH = ********$0~00 *********0.W00 WATER SERVICE 1" AT **$495.000 EACH *********0.000 ' WATER SERVICE 6" AT $1,425.000 EACH = ********$0.00 YOUR TOTAL 'ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL IS -- ******$600.00 WHEN REQUESTING INFORMATION OR CORRESPONDING ABOUT THIS STATEMENTvPLEASE REFER TO PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER'24-29-22-22-00170 NOTE: OBJECTIONS TO THIS ASSESSMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL THE CLOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT HEARING" ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTIONS (ORAL OR IN WRITING) TO ANY PART OF THIS ASSESSMENT STATEMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY CLERK OR THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT HEAR INGv4/24/89 _~_ 4WD _-__~-'-~____-.__--_-_-------___--_----_ DETAa M RETURN THIS PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT g/P MO. 5717 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT for PROJECT MO. 86-22 HILLCREST TRUNK SEWER PIN 24-29-22-22_0017 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ******$600.00 k PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHORIZED. �j FI " N 0 T I E O F P E N U I,N G P U B L I C I M P R O V E M E N T MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAME s HILL 86--22 IMPROVEMENT NO t 5717 PROPERTY -- DE SC RI PT IOV -- NIELSEN'S GARDEN LOTS LOT 10 BLK 2 PINS ID 24 29 22 22 0016 WAYNE P E SANDRA K MUDGETT 1567 MYRTLE AVE ST PAUL MN 551193128 ` CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B ' MAPLEWOODv MINNESOTA 55109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ... E;-F" -T-E—=m -r C31=�� ' D/P NO. 5717 PROJECT NO. 86-22 HILLCREST TRUNK SEWER THIS IS THE*ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE , .. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS CONCERNING THIS ASSESSMENT AS STATED ON THE ATTACHED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING. ' YOUR ASSESSMENT FOR PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 24-29-22_22-0016 IS AS FOLLOWI%-: � *********2,000 SANITARY SEWERUNITS AT**$300.000 EACH =******$600.00 *********0.000 SANITARY SEWER FF AT ***$3',0.000 EACH =********$0.00 *********0.000 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AT **$455.000 EACH = ********$0.00 *********0.000 WATER MAIN F.F. AT ***$30.000 EACH = ********$0.00 *********0.000 WATER SERVICE 1" AT **$495.000 EACH = ********$0.00 *********0.000 WATER SERVICE 6" AT $1,425.000 EACH = ********$0.00 " YOUR TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL IS -- ******$600.00 WHEN REQUESTING INFORMATION OR CORRESPONDING ABOUT THIS STATEMENT, PLEASE REFER TO PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 24-29-2-2-2'12-0016. NOTE: OBJEcTIONG TO THIS ASSESSMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL THE CLOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT HEARING" ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTIONS (ORAL OR IN WRITING) TO ANY pART OF THIS ASSESSMENT STATEMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY CLERK OR THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT HEARING, 4/24/89 DETACH AND ' RETDRN THIS PORTlDN WITH YDUR PAYMENT D/P NO. 5717 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT for PROJECT NO. 86-22 HILLCREST TRUNK SEWER PIN 24-29-22-22-0016 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ******$600.00 TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHORIZED. AGENDA ITEM , 3 WALTER STREET, Project 84-14 - Review Assessment Roll This item will be passed out at the Thursday Meeting, G, �/ Act MEMORANDUM ion by Counall TO: City Manager Endorsed—___... FROM: Director of Community Development Modified..... SUBJECT: Planning Commission Survey Rejected....... DATE: April 11, 1989 INTRODUCTION The City Council should decide whether they want to take any a-ction on the Planning Commission Survey discussed at the April 6th meeting, BACKGROUND The City Council previously. declared Al Goin's position on the Planning Commission to be vacant, but did not authorize staff to fill the vacancy& council requested a survey of other planning commissions, which was reviewed. at the April 6th meeting, ( See attached survey.) The survey showed that planning commissions varied in size from five to ten imembers. The major ity# 17 of 26 cities, have seven member commissions. Since the Council last reviewed this survey# Commissioner Dempsey has resigned to take a job in Northfield. This leaves two vacancies on the Commission. If they are not f i I led or the Commiss ion s i z e reduced, a quorum problem may develop, RECOMMENDATION If the Council is considering a reduction in the size of the Commission., they should initiate a code amendment to do so and refer it to the Planning Commission. Otherwise, Council should authorize staff to advertise to fill the two vacancies, GOPLANCOMM Attachment: Survey MEMORANDtJM TO City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Planning Intern SUBJECT: Survey of Pla'nning Commissions DATE: March 22,' 1989 I NTROEIUCT I ON The City Council requested a survey of the size and duties of other Planning Commissions. This survey included 26 cities in the metropolitan area closest in size to Maplewood (based on the 1980 census) or adjacent to the City, MEMBERSHIP The composition of Planning Commissions varies from five to ten members. The majority, 17 of 26 cities, have seven member Planning Commissions. Three of the cities use alternates, DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES The general duties of the Planning Commission are to act as an advisory committee to the City Council , to review applications and make recommendations on these applications and to study planning i sues e Other responsibilities are as follows: reviewing all plans, policies and programs for development in order to promote orderly development, preparing and recommending a Comprehensive Plan as well as reviewing all Plan amendments, 40"a assisting in zoning administration and reviewing all zoning .regul at ion amendments. The following are special task-s not done by all the Planning Commissions: am" conducting long-range planning, on" undertaking special studies for the City Council sitting as Boards of Review or Appeal, reviewing all City construction proposals over $10,000. APPLICATIONS REVIEWED 1. Variances: 19 of 26 cities. 2. CUP's or SUS` 's: 26 of 26 14 3. Rezoning: 26 of 26a 41. Code Amendments: 23 of 26. 6 of these relate only to zoning issues, 5. Platting: 26 of 26, 6. Minor subdivisions: 20 of 26. 7. PUD's: 25 of 25a es Public vacations: 9 of 26. 9. Home occupations.* 12 of 250 10. Sign permits: 6 of 26s 11. Site plans: 20 of 26. 12. Building permits: 2 of 26 13. Capital Improvement Programs: 10 of 260 PUBLIC HEARINGS 23 of the 26 Planning Commissions hold public hearings. In most of these cities, the City Council also held a hearing . resul ting in two hearings on each case, MEETINGS Planning Commissions meet from as -few as three times a year to twice a month, FINAL AUTHORITY In four cities, the Planning Commission had final approval authorityg subject to appeal to the City Council. This authority was in regard to 1) site pl an approval requiring no variances , 2) site plan approval and special use permits and 3) two cases ref ating to variances, PAYMENT Six cities paid their Planning Commission members. One paid per month ($70 for members and $B5 for the chairman). The other five paid per meeting, from $8 per meeting to $25 per meetings One city will begin paying their commissioners in the near future, . BG.PC*OMM li:.: CIS w. s wl ■ �w !w ■lu �11�►1 I�w!� ■,11 �Ilw�tliwll q ■;11 1 Nit Unfuw',Iloin ,Il�r�ilwl'lll I IN 'Imin 1 �w;ll ail .11 wall Iu 111 ■ 11 �Illi�wi ,Ill �II�Alwli`�tn 11tlNiwjilll�l �IIIGr�lw,llli►�1 illllli1w;1111111 i'I�I11w�11tM11 I!Illlirlliw!Illi[rll f 11111��I w i 11!l►�itl I!11 Illwlllll 11 IIi� 111w:11 ► it 11 11 !1 !i � . t I � I I. Iwl Iil �11� �IIIN'J�I�IIL1��lll�i1lIAAI �IllMtl!�11�111 �!IIL� ■IIe.�,. l 111 , El Imil llnlalw�l 1;11 ,�Ilwl 111 ■'.1 111�h�l ■;I IIWlilwl �!1 111Iw11 Ii11I�Mw�r a!IlNifllw;l 1'.Ilitlll��.l ��,111�►`111w`.I AIn,I ill 'lift ■ ►11 mw ■.11 t�ulw; moll m Ir a N 40 a a 44 jg AGENDA NUMBER 19" — --4!;-7 T0: Mayor and City Council Action by Council :{ Endorser _ FROM: City Manager Modified.__�___._ RE: PLAY EQUITY/COMPARABLE WORTH Rejected... Date DATE: April 28, 1989 INTRODUCTION 's Pa Equity Plan current, it is necessary that new positions To .keep the City's y q y . be evaluated during he first year, and existing positions re- evaluated on a g tested and others will periodic basis. The Staff Services position has been , p be tested during 1989. BACKGROUND The City f Maplewood adopted it's Pay Equity Plan in early 1988, and • y � p (1988-1989). In order to maintain the implemented it over a two -year period tan' validity, approximately 25% of the total job classifications will be plan's y • • • reexamined on a yearly basis, with new positions classified toward the end of the first year after the duties have been better defined. DISCUSSION A Time Sp ent Profile (T.S.P.) was completed for the Staff Services position and a "benchmark" scare was determined by surveying communities with s i mi 1 ar positions. A survey s also coed cted to establish the market.. As the �' followin g numbers indicate, the recommended salary is less than the market or equity line but is a step in the right direction. The position should be pay q y re- evaluated in two more years to see where it is in relation to the other jobs in Maplewood. 1989 01/01/89 1989 PAY 05/15/89 05/15/90. 05/15/91 ACTUAL MARKET E UITY PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED $3033/M0. $3794/M0. $4018/M0. $3214/M0. $3408/M0. $3612/M0. RECOMMENDATION It i s recommended that the City Council adopt the recommended pay schedule for the Staff Services Coordinator effective May 15, 1989, with the understanding that it be re- evaluated in approximately two years. MAM:kaz Attachment AGENDA NUMBER /I—,/ Action by Council AGENDA REPORT Endorsed Modified. Re�ecte� T0: City Manager I]at° _ FROM: Finance Director RE: 1988 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT AND AUDIT DATE: May 15, 1989 Recently the City's 1988 Annual Financial Report and Audit were completed. Three documents have been prepared: 1) General Purpose Financial Report - contains data extracted from the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and provides a concise summary of the City's financial condition. Copies of this report will be distributed to the City's advisory boards and commissions. Also, a limited supply will be available to the public. 2) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - contains detailed financial and statistical information to provide complete information on all financial transactions during the year. Copies of this report will be distributed to the Council, State Auditor, Moody's Investors Service, Standard and Poors, bond investors, and the Maplewood Library. 3) Management Letter - contains the auditors' comments and recommendations regarding financial management. Copies of this letter will be distributed to the Council and Finance staff at a later time. It is recommended that the Council schedule a meeting with the auditors to discuss these reports. Last year a special meeting was held to allow more time for discussion and review of the reports. DFF : kaz MEMORANDUM To Michael A. McGuire, From: Robert D. Odegard, Sub j : Community Survey Date: May 5, 1989 Introduction City Manager Director of Parks & Recreatio f% As a follow-up to previous information distributed regarding a commmunity survey, Dr. William Morris, President of Decision Re- sources Ltd., has returned from out of town, and I have discussed with him some of the aspects of a community survey. Background There are a number of different ways that a community can approach taking a survey, which include door -to- -door interviews, "man on the street" interviews, telephone interviews, and written responses. The cost for door -to -door interviews is very expen- sive and usually limits the size of the sample. The "man on the street" type of survey, which you may have experienced .at the Maplewood Mallt is also limiting in its numbers of persons to be surveyed and the cost is quite high. I suggest that the City consider either a mail survey or telephone survey. Attached are survey samples from the City of White Bear Lake, Inver Grove Heights, and City of Shoreview. The White Bear Lake survey is a general attitude survey that was conducted by mail to approximately 1, 000 city households. It was prepared in cooperation with city staff and the Minnesota Center for Survey Research at the University of Minnesota as a class project (project budget was $6,000). The Inver Grove Heights Parks and Recreation Department survey is part of a larger city -wide survey that is being done under the auspices of Brauer and Associates. The Parks and Recreation sur- vey is basically an awareness survey of current recreational fa- cilities and programs, and the extent to which the public is aware of these facilities. The results of this survey will help in future public recreation needs planning. Numerous municipalities, as well as State government and corpora- tions ( see attached capabilities statement) , have hired Decision Resources Ltd. of Minneapolis to prepare and compile information for Bond Referendums, Marketing Analysis, Public Relations Strat- egy, Crisis Management, Viability Studies, etc. Dr. Morris, who is President of the firm, has worked with many communities in preparing telephone surveys and analyzing their responses. Recommendation It is requested that the City Council approve the concept of a community survey, and to direct staff to meet with consultants to discuss the City's needs, and to have a consultant present to the City Council their Firm's process for a community survey. Attachments: July 15, 1987 Dear White Bear Lake Resident, The White Bear Lake City Council needs to gain your perspective on several proposals for Clty action. Your city government relies on the input of citizens like yourself to make effective policy decisions. The City of White Bear Lake has commi33ioned us to survey residents to determine their rating of city services and to identify opinions on city -amide issues. The results from this survey will be used to aid the City in developing future policy direction. Ycu, as a res.4. dent of 'rte: te Bear make, are being asked to give your opinions on these important issues. Your name Was drawn randomly from a listing of White Bear Lake residents. In order that the results Will truly represent the thinking of city residents, it is important that every questionnaire be completed and returned. The enclosed survey form should be filled out by a member of the household Who is 18 or over, and should be sent back to the Minnesota Center for Survey Research at the University of Minnesota, You may be assured of complete confidentiality. The questionnaire has an identification number for mailing purposes only. This is so that we may check your name off of the mailing list when your questionnaire is returned. Your name will never be placed on the questionnaire. Please c^mpl e.te and rpt srn this survey in the * "closed postage -paid , sel ff Im 3d tressed envelope at your earliest convenience. I would be most happy to answer any questions you might have. Please feel free to call me at 627 -4282. Thank you fo:^ your assistance. Sincerely, Wiliam J. Craig Dirsctor WBL. &'*TR/M -47 you have My other convents you would like to sake about living in e City of White Bear Lake? Thank you for your time and your cooperation, tom ,)lease return this survey in the enclosed postage Pa !!i ota Doter far 3W"y University of Hinnewta 2122 nwtside "pus glut Hinnpota 55454 -1320 7 i w r :.. city of White Bear, Lake �m� Minnesota Center for Survey. Research University of Minn"Ota Hinneapolia, Minnesota 5545 4 C11! or in LM Please circle the nmt sr Mbioh corresponds to the one answer closest to y opinion or yam• current situation. All individual responses will be our kept 000fidential. Q10 am would you rat the living 0onditions in your nel&borbood? (eb000e one) 1. Bbco�lleot 2. Good 3• lair M. Poor 01. !Here is a list of reasons people might dive for living in Vhit Bar Laid rather than another community. Mhiob are the three that are isportant to you? (Moose three) 2a. CloseMu to f risode 2b* r «1 more .eoure 200 ftv roe t is better 24. Recreation facilities 2e. Costs less than otber comnnities 2f. Privacy . 2s9 Better city eprrioes 2b. Better sbopping opportunities ' 21. Sobools 2 j e Closeness to St. !wl/MinMpolis 2ke Closeness to job 219 Small city atoosphere 2a. Taxes 2n. Other (Please soesify) Q3. Mould you like the City to prepare a neweletter explaining current activities and issues? 1. Tee . 2. So 1 ,s + M.,_ `,� '� "`~ . ,i�'ji ► nti' �'. Rea A•. Q4', Vhers do you got your inforgation about City activities? 2 (Circle all that apply) Ma. Wits sear Press Mb, St. Paul Pioneer Press /Dispatob Mo. Radio 4d. Television Me. Other (Please speoity) -- 45. Do you feel snough inforoation about City aotivities and issues is oade available to you? 1. yes 2. No So 16 QMM T) Q6. Mat additional inforoation about City aotiVities Would you Bits to receive? • Qq. Do you !N1 property values in your so= 11 e'bood are bluer, the sae, or lower than those in otber areas of the City of Mbite Bear Late? (Choose one) . 1. 8igber than others 2. The same as others 3• Lower than others . Strongly ly art §qVrt O�ose. se Qd. Do you support or oppose City efforts , to encourage core private nester # rental bousiug? (Choose one) i 2 3 Q9. Do you support or oppose City efforts to encourage core public seesioe rental housing? ( Choose one) i 2 3 Q10. Do you support or. oppose City efforts to enoourago more public sabaidised t fbily rental housing? (Choose one) 1 2 3 2 Whet are the three b"t thIW about living in White Bear lake? proposalst (Choose one answer for each proposals Q 11. Strongly Strongly art Emilse se a. 1 adjacent to the lake called / 2 3 4 : White Sear Lake. be QjS• Upanded City rede"10PROnt of 2 1 3 A deteriorating ass' o. clean industry and office NploTment into the 000unity on 1 2 What are the three "mt tbboa about living in White Bear take? land already soned for those uses. 4 12. Q17, Downtown- public imprbvMents such as parking, trees, sidemalks, ' 2 3 8 ae Q18. ZxpmWed City redevelopo Wt of 2 i A areas with deteriorating Ao�siat0 be Q190 Creation of a City housing code • which would require property ewers o. 3 8 houses and aparUnnts 0 1 Q200 Carsroial redevelopmet of the 2 Q13• !lease rate each of the following city services: Highway 61 oorridor. Please answer the following set of questions about youtwife MOW for e_h service) information will be used only to comps" people's an mrs0 used to identify you in any way (CAM one Done t gxoellent Good F= poor [now 1 2 3 � 8 13s, 3aaitary eewr 0 . . . 0 0 . 2 3 t 8 13b. Drinking water . • 1 2 3 # 8 130. City beeches 0 . • 0 • • • • 1 1360 weigbborlmood parks 0 0 0 0 0 1 3d .2 3 3 t +� 8 e 130. Softball n elds. 0. 0 0•• 1 2 3 y 8 13t0 Felice prot0otioe0 . 0 0 0 0 1 2 139* fire prot00tion0 1 2 2 3 3 # 8 once s0rvioe. 13h0 l�ul i 2 3 # 8 1310 30m, reg val on streets. 0 1 Me M w reeoval on side+walks. 1 2 3 � M e 8 13k0 "rbage 0oileoti0a . 1 2 3 3 # 8 1310 1i• 0 . 0 0 0 2 1300 eumning . 0.. 0 0 0 1300 Downtown PU*1m . 1 2 2 3 3 M 8 8 130. Aaiaal 006troi 0 • 1 13p. Driver /Auto License tur " � 2 3 M • 8 9 1300 Street aale�� 0 0 1 2 2 3 3 M 8 ' 13r* Street 110tiag. .... 0 1 3 M ,. Ye would like to htno�w whether You support or oppose each of the follarin8 proposalst (Choose one answer for each proposals Strongly Strongly art Emilse se q 140 Wroved aooess and public parks 1 adjacent to the lake called / 2 3 4 : White Sear Lake. QjS• Upanded City rede"10PROnt of 2 1 3 A deteriorating ass' Q16. Continued efforts to bring . clean industry and office NploTment into the 000unity on 1 2 3 A land already soned for those uses. Q17, Downtown- public imprbvMents such as parking, trees, sidemalks, ' 2 3 8 and li.gbting. Q18. ZxpmWed City redevelopo Wt of 2 i A areas with deteriorating Ao�siat0 - Q190 Creation of a City housing code • which would require property ewers to properly S►intain existing 2 3 8 houses and aparUnnts 0 1 Q200 Carsroial redevelopmet of the 2 3 • S Highway 61 oorridor. Please answer the following set of questions about youtwife leis be it Will not information will be used only to comps" people's an mrs0 used to identify you in any way Q210 What Year wore you born? Q22. Are you Sale or female? 1. Male 2, Female M Q23. poy 9My years have you lived in Vbit• Deer Lake? mmm� _ ra Less than am year Q24. Do you rent or Wm your bm*U* unit? 1. Dent 2. Own Q00 mat type of bogs do you live in? (Choose 000) 1* simae ally bo.h 2. ToMnhou" 3• Duple: 4. 4partmMt 5. other (!leas• apeoliy) - as. Wdeb Mar4 40 you live in? (Choose one) 1. Vard 1 2. Yard 2 3• Vubd 3 4. Yard 4 5. Hard 5 60 Do not ko w Q"* 11m go* loapr do you Plan to lire• in ibit• Dear Lake? (Choose one) 11 Less tban 1 year 2. 1 to 2 years 3. 3 to 5 YOM" 49 Over 5 yeses QN, Mbea you nest Nowe, dot type of bore Mill you probably Moir• to? (CAooN one) ` 1. aiosl• taM►ily boa. 2. Taialause 3• DuPleac 4. Alwtmont ` 5. Other (?lemse •peony) ' 6. Don't •spent to nor• 5 Q29. Mat 19 your 000upation, 016.0% you now "tol"d? 7. Retired 8. Don't have a paid job Q30. Now man y adults 18 and over live in your bouae1�o14, iaoludin8 yourself or do you live alone? Ole "Live a vas Q3 1 . Row Nn y children uteler 16 live in your b Nod old? Q32 Moat is your Marital status? (Choose one) I. Married 2. ginsle 3. Midowed 4. Divorced (IF on NMMO 00 TO OMlm0 ) Q33• What year was your apou•• born? • • �a 000upatioa, or is your spouse oar retired? Q34. Mat is y PgsN 7. Retired 8. Doesn't have a paid job Q35. Mbst is your total fabily inoMe? Tbis is i"ortant because It gives us a clue to the price of Muses that sbould be built, surve y to completely anonyouag so the figure remains yyour caret. Me appreciate your answer to this question. 1. Mader $159000 per year 2. $15.000 - $199999 3. 620,000 - 6249999 4. 6259000 - $29099 5. $309000 - $399999 69 WON $1499999 ?. 650,000 - $599999 S. $609000 - $69099 9. 6700000 or over 6 Awareness and Use of Inv r rove Heieht,s Recreation Facilities r 1. Below is a list of facilities located in Inver Grove Heights. • AWARENESS existence of the facility by .circling the number in the awareness column.. • • • • A. Please indicate your AWARENESS of the ex�ste Y • hold have USED THE FACILITY in the past 12 months. For seasonal facilities, indicate how often B. Then indicate the frequency with which you or members of your house the facility is used during that season. • • with the facility b circling the number that best reflects your opinion. If you have not used a C. Finally, if you have used a facility, indicate your OVERALLS wit y y g Y facility, leave this column blank. A B C Facilities managed by Inver Grove Heights Park and Recreation Department: 1. Playground equipment 2. Outdoor basketball courts 3. Football /soccer fields 4. Picnic facilities 5. Outdoor ice rinks 6. Sand volleyball court 7. Baseball /softball fields 8. Sliding hills 9. Tennis courts 14. Fishing 11. Horseshoe pits Traits: 12. Nature trails 13. Jogging paths 14. Bicycling paths 15. Snowmobile paths 16. Cross- country ski trails Facilities managed by Inver Grove Heights Park and Recreation Department: 17. Indoor ice arena (I.G.H. Hockey Association) 18. Indoor. swimming pool (Simley High School) 19. Senior citizens center (Good Shepherd Lutheran Church) Awareness Not Aware A_wat 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Use of Facilities Not Used Use More in Past Use Less Than Use Once Than Once 12 Months Qnce a Week a Week a Week 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Satisfaction Extremely Extremely Dissatisri Satisri 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 Z 3 4 S 1 2 3 4 5 you 2. How do u or members of your household hear about the recreation facilities and programs in Inver Grove Heights? (Circle all that apply.) 5. I you u circled "Yes" to Question 4, in which of the following activities do you participate? (Circle all that apply.) If you answered "No ", go to Question 60 i. City Recreation Activities brochure 1. Weight training 2. 3. Sun Current t Review South-West 2. Aerobic exercise ' 4 . .Paul Dispatch St p 3. 4. Swimming Racquetball 5. Star Tribune 5. Running 6. Church bulletins 6. Tennis 7. Word -of -mouth 7. Basketball 8. he facility Drive by t ty 8. Volleyball 9. School flyers 9. Golf 10. specify) Other (Please pe fy) 10. Other (Please specify) ration In ASLIVitin 3. Below is a list of recreation and leisure activities. In which of the following activities do you or members of your household participate? (Circle all that apply.) 1. Walking or jogging 19. Movies 2. Softball- 20. Tennis 3. Baseball 21. Horseshoes 4. Golf 22. Basketball 5. Cross country skiing 23. Horseback riding 6. Snowmobiling 24. Gymnastics 7. Swimming 25. Exercise 8. Reading 26. Theater 9. Unstructured play 27. Picnic 10. Hockey 28. Volleyball 11. Ice skating 29. Camping 12. Educational programs 30. Racquetball 13. Fishing 31. Boating 14. Community events 32. Archery 15. Soccer 33. Spectator Sports 16. Football 34. Gardening 17. Biking 35. Arts and crafts 18. Bowling 36. Other (Please specify) 4. Do you or members of your household belong to a private health club, athletic club, or country club? (Circle only one.) 1. Yes 2. No 6. Approximately how many hours per week . do you or members of your household spend involved with recreation and leisure interests? (Circle only one.) 1. Less than 5 hours 2. 5 to 10 hour 3. 11 to 20 hours 4. 21 to 30 hours 5. 31 or more hours 7. Compared to five years ago, are you or members of your household spending more or less of our recreation time using Inver Grove Heights' spe g Y recreation FACILITIES? (Circle only one.) 1. Spending much less time 2. Spending less time 3. Spending about the same amount of time 4. Spending more time 5. Spending much more time 8. In the next rive years, how much recreation time do you or members of your household expect to spend using Inver Grote Heights' recreation FACILITIES? (Circle only one.) 1. Expect to spend much less time 2. Expect to spend less time 3. Expect to spend about the same amount of time 4. Expect to spend more time 5. Expect to spend much more time 9. To what extent is participation limited by the following for you or members of your household in those facilities and programs managed by Inver Grove Heights? Preferred Recreation Activities, Nrograms and Facilities 10. Below is a list of Parks. and. Recreation FACILITIES NOT CURRENTLY PROVIDED by the City of Inver Grove Heights. How likely would you or members of your household be to use each facility in the next five years if it were made available` Would Would Definitely Definitely Not Use Use- 1. 'Community fitness center 1 2 3 4 5 2. Senior citizens center 1 2 3 4 5 A Indoor ice arena 1 2 3 4 5 Outdoor recreation areas: 4. 18-hole golf course 5. !outdoor swimming complex 6. `wildlife preserve 7. Community band shell 8. Riverfront park /marina 9. Community -wide trail system 1 2 3 3 4 Not At 5 A Great 3 4 4 5 Al 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 Deal 1. Amount of time available for leisure 1 2 3 4 5 2. Availability of transportation 1 2 3 4 5 3. Travel distance 1 2 3 4 5 4. Cost of the activity 1 2 3 4 5 5. Cost of the equipment 1 2 3 4 5 6. Availability of facilities 1 2 3 4 5 7. Personal health 1 2 3 4 5 8. Having the skills to participate 1 2 3 4 5 9. Dislike for organized activity 1 2 3 4 5 10. Safety of facilities /personal safety 1 2 3 4 5 11. Supervision of the activity 1 2 3 4 5 12. Availability of daycare 1 2 3 4 5 13. School boundaries 1 2 3 4 5 14. Hours that facilities are open 1 2 3 4 5 15. Maintenance of facilities 1 2 3 4 5 16. Ease of access to facilities 1 2 3 4 5 17. Availability of information about 1 2 3 4 5 facilities and programs Preferred Recreation Activities, Nrograms and Facilities 10. Below is a list of Parks. and. Recreation FACILITIES NOT CURRENTLY PROVIDED by the City of Inver Grove Heights. How likely would you or members of your household be to use each facility in the next five years if it were made available` Would Would Definitely Definitely Not Use Use- 1. 'Community fitness center 1 2 3 4 5 2. Senior citizens center 1 2 3 4 5 A Indoor ice arena 1 2 3 4 5 Outdoor recreation areas: 4. 18-hole golf course 5. !outdoor swimming complex 6. `wildlife preserve 7. Community band shell 8. Riverfront park /marina 9. Community -wide trail system 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 Below is a list of Parks and Recreation PROGRAMS NOT CURRENTLY PROVIDED by the City of Inver Grove Heights. How likely would you or members of your household be to participate in each program in the next five years if it were made available? Would Would Definitely Definitely Partid to Particioat�e_ 1. Day camp 1 2 3 4 5 2. Special Olympics 1 2 3 4 5 3. Yoga 1 2 3 4 5 4. Teen programs 1 2 3 4 5 5. Community band 1 2 3 4 5 6. Community theater 1 2 3 4 5 7. Community choir 1 2 3 4 5 8. Community orchestra 1 2 3 4 5 9. Fine arts (e.g., painting, pottery) , 1 2 3 4 5 10. Singles activities /events 1 2 3 4 5 11. Other (Please specify) 12. Haw important u �t to make impra�veen�ents or additions to the City park system in the following areas? Not At All Very Important Important recreation 1. Organized Programs 1 2 3 4 5 ditiot�al rk land 1 2 3 4 5 2, AcgUWq ad p a 3, physical improvements in parks to enable or enhance specific activities 4. Improvement and /or enlargement of the trail system 5. Grooming, maintenance, and landscaping of parks 6. Park supervision and police surveillance of parks 7. Addin special use facilities: g a. 18 -hole golf course b. Indoor ice arena c. Outdoor swimming complex d. Community fitness center e. Mississippi riverfront park and public areas 8. Other (Pleases ) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4. 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 ' 13. 'Where has been some discussion within the community about developing Mississippi riverfront area.. Please indicate your level o f interest in the pp each of the types of development listed below. $40 $50 $0 $10 $2:0 Not At All $40 $50 Very $10 $2:0 Int $40 $50 In re ted 1. Marna 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 4 5 2. Wildlife preserve 1 2 3 4 5 3. Walking trails 1 2 3 4 5 4. 5. Picnic areas it band shell Community 1 2 3 4 5 5 6. Cross- country ski trails 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 7. Snowmobile trails 1 2 3 4 5 8. Fishing 1 2 3 4 5 9. Camping 1 2 3 4 5 10. Public boat access referendum were used to create 14. If a public bond re funding for Park and o Recreation Facilities and Programs, how much would you be willing to pay m additional y ' i nal taxes annually to support each of the facilities and programs listed below? 1. Acquiring new park land 2. Developing existing park land 3. Expanding the trail system (e.g., biking, hiking, skiing) Special use facilities: 4. 18 -hole golf course 5. Indoor ice arena 6. Outdoor swimming complex 7. Community fitness center 8. Mississippi riverfront park and public areas Additional Annual Ta�c $0 $10 S20 $30 S40 $50 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $0 S10 S20 $30 $40 $50 $0 $10 $2:0 $30 $40 $50 $0 $10 $2:0 $30 $40 $50 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $o $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 Community is, sues_ Below is a list of statements about Inver Grove Heights. Read each statement and then indicate your opinion by circling the number to the right of the statement. 15. Public recreation facilities and programs play an important role in the way I feel about the quality of life in Inver Grove Heights. 16. The value of my property will increase ha ving a ' good park and recreation by ha system in Inver Grove Heights. 17. Public-bond referendums are a good method for raising money for park improvements or acquisitions. 18. The Parks and Recreation Department is doing a good job of providing programs and facilities that meet M personal recreation needs. 19. The Parks and Recreation Department is doing a good job of providing programs and facilities that meet my Tamil vs recreation needs. 20. The Parks and Recreation Department is doing a good job of providing programs and facilities that meet the recreation needs of the community. 21. The school system should provide more recreation facilities and programs to Inver Grove Heights residents. Strongly Strongly Di._ sa_gree _Arm 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Baciceround Information The following questions will be used to help Inver Grove Heights better understand the needs of different groups within the community. Your responses are completely confidential. 22. Below is a map of Inver Grove Heights divided by precinct. Please indicate the voting precinct in which you live by circling the correct response below. Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6 Precinct 7 Precinct 8 C" or «ra own errs. PR. 6 Mom. Room IOUNOMnEa 1 - 4 5 5 • •• -�' ---------- -•- , 1r.E� 66TH fT. , n • t i PR. 5 PR. a m 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 s s s s . 23. Do you own or rent your home? (Circle only one.) I. Oven 2. Rent 24. How many people live in your household? 25. of those who live in your household, how many are in each age group? Male Female 1. 0-4 yrs. 2. 5 -14 yrs. 1 15 -24 yrs. 4. 25 -44 yrs. 5. 45-64 yrs. 6. 65 -75 yrs. 7. 75 + yrs. 26. What is the highest level of formal education you have completed? (Circle only one.) 1. Grammar school or less 2. Some high school 3. High school graduate. 4. Some VaTech school 5. Vo-Tech degree 6. Some college 7. College degree (BA., B.S.) 8. Some graduate school 9. Graduate school (MA., Ph.D.) 27. Which category best represents your household's yearly pre - taxable income? (Circle only one.) 6 - 12 months I. S 0 - 129500 2. S 12,500 - 2000 3. S 209001 - 30,004 4. S 30,001 - 40,000 5. S 40,001 - 50,000 6. S 50,001 - 75,(x O 7. S 759001+ 28. How long have you lived in Inver Grove Heights? (Circle only one.) 1. Less than 6 months 2. 6 - 12 months 3. 1- 2 years 4. 3 - 5 years 5. 5 -10 years 6. 11 or more years 290 What one or two things would you recommend to improve Inver Grove Heights Parks and Recreation facilities or programs? THANK YOU FOR HELPING IMPROVE OUR PARK AND RECREATION SYSTEM!! PLEASE FOLD THE QUESTIONNAIRE, STAPLE OR TAPE IT SHUT, AND MAIL RACK AS SOON AS YOU COMPLETE IT. THANK YOU!'. D ecision Resources Ltd. CAPABILITIES STATEMENT The Firm Ltd* is a full- service market and research Decision Resources Lt ad served was incorporated in 1983, and has already firm. DRL P ate. public, and .political clients across the nation in the private, p • main offices are located in Minneapolis, sectors* The f irm s ' de in Pittsburgh , Penn - Minnesota, and Divisional Personnel rest sylvania. • 1 word processing, duplication, print - As a .full - service firm, al p titer anal - ing, sample selection, interview tabulation, and comp Y te. All telephone sis are undertaken on -site* surveys are conducted ul Minnesota. Local in- at the DRL honeban.k located in Saint Pa an cia ft, ' zed interviews are administered , by company home and elite /spe • • o internal. IBM computer facilities, the personnel. In addition t at the P remote entry access to the CYBLR system firm also has a University of Minnesota* • d of fifty full -time and part-time em- The company is compose y ss extensive eso The main principals of the firm posse ploye . n public affairs, survey research, an .backgrounds • in marketing, p background allows ' ical methods. This cross-disciplinary • g - statlst esearch problems from many different perspec DRL to approach r p ' 'ves and to evaluate potential strategies from a myriad of ti , theoretical bases. Recent and Current Clients Private and Public Sector Clients: unici alities and State Government Analysis, Plymouth, Minnesota City f Plymouth, Park Referendum Y ' nnesota y it Services Assessment, Plymouth, Ml City of Plymouth, city Minnesota of Plymouth, Quality of Life Study, Plymouth, City Ym City of Bloomington, Quality of Life Study, Bloomington, Minnesota , . solid and Harzardous Waste Disposal City of Inver Grove Heights, S • y Grove Heights, Minnesota Study, Inver Gr g eational Facilities City of Inver Grove Heights, Parks and Recr sis Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota Needs Analysis, Roseville, Minnesota City of Roseville, Quality of Life Study, 3128 Dean Court •Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 • (6t2) 920 -0337 • ualit of Life Study, Shoreview, Minnesota City of Shoreview, Q Y a Grove, f Cotta y, Cottage City o a Grove, Economic Development S tud g Minnesota ies Needs Analysis, Eagan, Parks and Recreational Facilities Y City of g , Eagan, Minnesota City o f Plymouth, pl outh • Quality of Life Tracking Study, Plymouth, Minnesota Community Center Needs Study, Chaska, Minnesota City of Chaska, Comm Y e Administrative f Woodbur , 4r Re f erendum Planning i.ng • for th City � y Minnesota Facilities Proposal, Woodbury, Needs • Canada Parks and Recreational Facilities Nee City of Little , Analysis, Little Canada, Minnesota City of Mounds View, Quality y • °t of Life Study, Mounds View, Minnesota • Res Needs Analysis, Hopkins, Minnesota City of Hopkins , Re Lakeville, Minnesota ' of Lakeville, Quality of Life Study, La � . City • Vision: 20�C Project, Burnsville, Minnesota City of Burnsville, 'c Develo ment Study, City of Richfield, Municipal Services /Economl p Richfield, Minnesota d Population City of Richfield Marketing Task Force, City Image an p Mobility tudy, Richfield, Minnesota • y ecreational Facilities Needs City of Oakdale., Parks and R . Analysis Oakdale, M.innesota. n • • on Residential Needs Analysis, New Brighton, City of New Brighton, Minnesota Minnesota Minnetonka, Employee Census,. Minnetonka, City of Mi � Rosemount, Minnesota City f Rosemount , 2010 Project, R , y esidential Attitudes Survey, Stillwater, Washington County, R Minnesota Dakota County, valuation West t Household Hazardous Waste Program Evaluation, Saint Paul, Minnesota Stud Saint Minnesota World Trade Center, Regional Feasibility y, Paul, Minnesota Govern Division of Government Training Services, Study for the Energy the State Department of Administration, Saint Paul, Minnesota Corporations • - Cowles Communications, Inc., Theat re Market Segmentation Analy s is, Minneapolis, Minnesota . 3M, Public Relations ' Department, Corporate Culture Analysis, p Saint Paul, Minnesota es Anal sis, 3M. Issues Management Task Force, Image and Issu y Saint Paul, Minnesota 'o Methods Relations De artment, Group Facilitation , 3M, Public R p Saint Paul, Minnesota Internal Communicat ions Study 3M, Public Relati ons Department , Relations Department, Saint Paul,.Minnesota 3M, Public Rel p Department, External communications Study, 3M, Public Relations Depar , Saint Paul, Minnesota 3M, Public Relations al pub_ ions Department, Market Analysis of Local lications, Saint Paul, Minnesota 3M Public Relations Department, Course Ulm 1 Strategy, Saint Paul, Minnesota 3M Public Relations Department, Practicum on Public Relations Strategy, Saint Paul, Minnesota 3M r Executive Offices, Crisis Management Team /Product Failure, Saint Paul, Minnesota 1 3M Leisure Products Division, Packaging Analysis, Saint Paul, Minnesota CFS- Minnesota, Inc., Planning and Communications Focus Group Sessions, Golden Valley, Minnesota CFS- Minnesota Inc., Sexual Harassment and Appropriate Behavior Focus Group Sessions, Golden Valley, Minnesota Continental Cablevision Sierra Region, Fresno City Utility Tax Referendum, Continental Cablevision, Stockton, California Financial Institutions and Realtors NNNNNN� I Franklin State Bank, Rural Viability Study, Franklin, Minnesota Twin City Federal Savings and Loan, Market Study, Minneapolis, Minnesota James Hoffman and Associates, Rural Housing Study, Willmar, Minnesota First Bank Minneapolis, Metropolitan Area Quality of Life Study, First Banks System, Minneapolis, Minnesota Business Organizations Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce, Major League Baseball Task Force, Twins Market Study, Minneapolis, Minnesota Greater .M p Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce, Convention Center Preference Study, Minneapolis, Minnesota Minnesota Project on Corporate Responsibility, Leadership in � p Transition Study, Minneapolis, Minnesota Minnesota Association of Commerce and Industry, Membership Survey Series, Saint Paul, Minnesota School Districts Bloomington School District, Communications Audit, Bloomington, Minnesota Mounds View School District, Referendum Planning Study, Roseville, Minnesota Diocese of Saint Augustine, Catholic Education in the Jacksonville Area Study, Jacksonville, Florida Diocese of Saint Augustine, Catholic Education in the Saint Dioc g � Florida Augustine Area Study, Saint Augustine, Flory - School, Market Se Totino Grace High , Segmentation Study, Fridley, S Minnesota Be thlehem Academy, School Feasibility Study, Faribault, Minnesota Y Angels High School, Alumni Perceptions Study, Richfield, Minnesota Saint Matthews Elementary School, Parish Family Preference and Future Policies Analysis, Saint Paul, Minnesota } e of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Dakota County School Archdiocese Feasibility Study, Saint Paul, Minnesota Religious Organizations Archdiocese of Saint Pa ul and Minneapolis, Development office, Appeal Annual Catholic A eat Market Segmentation Analysis, Saint Paul, Minnesota School Sisters of N , otre Dame Community and Ministry Satisfaction Study, Mankato, Minnesota Non -trof it and Cultural Arts Or anizations cal Society, Ramsey County Restore Y, Membership Survey and New Member Drive, Saint Paul, Minnesota Market Segmentation Analysis, College o • Shaughnes s y Dance Series, of Saint Catherine, Saint Paul, Minnesota Minnesota opera, Potential Audience Study, Development The Minne p , office, Saint Paul, Minnesota The League of Minnesota Cities, Membership Survey, Saint Paul, Minnesota 't Television, Cable Subscribers Satisfaction Northwest Community Study, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 4� SHOREV I EW DRAT 1 -1 DE`ISION RESCLR%00 • LTD. Ci ty Services /Park :s 3.129 Lean Court - • Minnesota fil ,nneapo� mss, Resources , Ltd . s a nationwide Hello I'm �-- —„ °f Decision tolkin wi %V pe►op le ' -firm located in Mznreapol is. We re 9 P • rid would 1 i i;e to as�c you a few questions are a i rz Shore•i�ew, today a cQr:f i den t i a 1 basis - (DO NOT PAUSE) 10 Apprc.:imately hcw many years 11 4 4 e:s nu Je .& ew. "a�� Ii now stand • how long in 2. As things to ly`ie the future do you a : :p ec t in =' horevi ew? c OS THAN O *:E YEAR. - - ... I C *;E OR T'WO YEAR.... THR&E.E TO Fi'VE YE_ RS..... S SIX TO TE.`4 YEARS . - - - - • ELEVEN TO TWENTY Y EARS . . OVER TWEN_rf YEARS ....... b DON T KNNOW/REFUCED LESS THAN ONE Y'EAR.... - - 1 ONE TO TWO YEARS ....... . THREE TO FIVE YEARS . - .. 3 %I X TO TEN OVER TES`! YEARS...... _ _ . . D0N 7 T KNOW/ REFJSED . - - . - . b �- i-- ualit of EXO... lT...- .----- -• -..1 A= Haw would you ra ..2 t..e q Y lent COOJ..........- ...-- - - - -.? ONLY FAIR...•...- .......3 SCO. , only fair , or poor.? n RO..,R.....• -•- -• -•�+ DON v T KJ%'0W / REFUc ED .... - . • ,S i ahau t living in Shoreview? 4. What do you like _i W y What do you like LEASt about it? �. . - - - -- OEM OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES. - . • - . 2 _ general , do you Lsuo' ly spend TVITIES.. - - . - ln g INDOOR A� yo cir 3.2 i s urn time in outdoor weat:�er• permitting, 80TH.. • • - - - • • • • activities, O LEISURE TIME... - • . • . -4 N or indoor activities? h!'T KiVCr1 /RE1�L'SED. •..j DO . r' 1 ist of recreational activit1eS • Fo Z would like to read you a en a e in t:�at activity . Do ` /ou each one, tell Rte how of ten you 9 9 , re oftens once a n faze activity fac:r tames a week or m several engage 3 each mo n t:� , about a ut once a months _ 2 week, a couple o-r times lea_ times each year, or not at all- For Seasonal activities, p 1 2 • • • t1e l ... • � durin the season. Remember , - �e how often you par "iczpa,.z 9 anticipate, not P - � � d in the number a-f .times We are 1n..eres..e you • attend as an observer= • r• 4+ T S �:E� ONCE ONCE SMVEsRAL- NOT D . K . YEAR AT ALL REF . WEE K WELLY hONTH 7. Baseball or 2 3 4 5 S 1 s oftb a l 1 g ases? . . 1 3 4 6 8. Bask 1 ? 90 ... Bi cyc' =n9 3 4 5 b IF DOES B I C`: CLE • i ' :.� do you lv _ . Where �n the C� ,.y Y i.;sually bicycie7 1 2 3 4 5 6 i 11 . ? Bowl i:�g - 1 2 3 b I .... ol-fin ? C g • 2 3 4 J b 13. Hunting ? i 2 - 4 1 4. Jo ging- 9 • 1., . Cr o ss--Eo entry 2 3 4 5 6 Skiing? 1 3 4 J b 16,o Snowmob i 1 ing 4 5 b 17. Swimming? 6 1 2 3 4 13_ ? Tennis_ 6 1 lq. Hiking. ? b 2�J - ,, • ? 1 2 Picnicking? . • 4 � 3 210 Exercising in a' b gym or health � 4 � Spa . 20 you rat the Overall, would y _ _ . EXCE' T._...•... park • . _ ....... 2 GOOD.....-- •••- . • and r ecr eat i o nal facilities in •.... -_..3 ONLY FAI` 0 40 lent, good Shoreview as excel 9 POUR • ...... - .. - . - .... . ...4 ... • r poor? - � only fair, � ... DON PT KNOW /REFUSED. • • - • 2 could you tell me about how FREGUEr1TLY 23_ of ten you and other members of OCCASIONALLY • _ . • • • • _ 40 a • our household Have used the park NOT AT ALL00WOMM00aft . • 1010 3 and recreation facilities in DON T KNOW RE• JSED. Shcrevi�ew during the past year would you say '.`requen t I y , occasionally, or not at all IF "OCCASIONALLY" OR "NOT AT ALL" IN 011ESTi ON #32 , ASS; 24- Is there some particular reason why your household does not use the park and recrea t =on Sys teat more -fregLen1 y? ..... - - - Now dww — ----------------------- .i �4� T _ d now l i ke to ask you a few questions about th Shoreview par k system. Could , Y ou tell me 1'.-he name of the neighborhood park closest to y our residence? (IF VAGUE • ASK:) Could you tell me .its locations • 26 How -frequently do you or member= q Y VERY FRED- UENTLY • ... - - - - • 1 . of your household use the OCCASIONALLY. • • • • . • - - .. .2 ne Chbor:lood park nearest to yc�u occasionally, NOT AT ALL .............. DON'T K1`d0W/REF=US= � 10 10 • _ • • 4 --- very frequently, uently , v y q � or not at all? 27M, From ;�ha t • ou have heard or seen, Fr EXCELLEN- To . - a 0 W • . . .. 0 0 0 0 1 2 how would you rate ' the upkeep and GOOD • . • . . • • • • -10 10 ... • - - • - ONLY FAIR - • • - • • • • • - •3 maintenance of the -facilities in • • • • P�]CR - - • - 1010.. _ ..4 t park'— -- a =xcel l ent , good • t:�a p _ . • 1010.... DO;�!' T Ki'10W /RFC- -UGE'' 1010 _ 1010. J ? only fair, or .poor. 23. Are there any facilities not currently in the park that you there? members of our family would use, if they were . or Y (IF ' YES , " ASK:) What are the"'? 29,0 VERY FREOUE`TLY • • - • • • • • • I OCCASIONALLY • • MOM • • • :a • - - 2 During the past yearp weather perrnz t •. t ' a.ng , how often did you household NOT AT ALL 10.10 • - - . • • • - - - • 3` of our p ir- members y - of the larger er city visit one 9 ]DON'T KNOW /REFUSES. • - • - .. 4 1010 parks -- very -Frequently, . occasional ly, or not at all? • - -- 1010 - - - -- . __ . 3 'r i dp IF «RREMUENTLY- N OR "OCCASIONALLY ! I& �_ you enera3ly visit In 3 Did Y �3 - of ver•roon or the morm , even i ncj ,? ASk.. w 4P 0 1"'�O AFTER "• -- •0000...._ -.�.. E%vtEN- INN 0 0 0 0 .. - ... • ... _ .. 3 VARIES ................. . DO N P T KNOW /REFUSED 0 0 .. 0 0 W. what You have heard or see nn om Y .ce 31 • �r � you -rate the maintenance w would Y ��' - ,. • n the larger t:-�e -�'acilitries z of ood ! only parks -- excellent? 9 -fair• or poor? -- have � or an / �., :in -the past year, /ou led 3c - �.. -�' our househo 1 d enro 1 mew ..- er o Y • - ci t, - sponsored recreat.16 in d program'' EXC�1- LENT - - -•- 0000.. -_..1 OCLD•-- ........-- •- - - - -.2 ONLY FAIR.. -.- 0000.. -- -.3 POOR..........._..,• -•-.4 Do i' T r NOW/ RE USED .. - - - . YES_.- •••--- •••- •... - - -.1 NC--- •- •- •••••••...-- -•.:. DON � T KNOW `F-cr= L1Sc .. I F "YES . ASS: �... .�, YES•_. -- aregis • find • d ou ent . K*1CW /REFUSED • • Pr ocess corneni DO rT - ... 3 1 r 1 �- rsot now ire operation by an, rograms for adul l-s red? ( IF "YES 34. Are there ! P uld 1 ike to see o-f • e the . City that you wo A What are t:�a• /? -- ou t:-s not now i n ro rams -for chi 1 dren or • y 5eo offered ? 3 J a Are there anY P 9 ; . hat ou would like to er.ation by the C�tY t Y � op , _ What are the 1 . (IR .YES, ASS. } amp VE. y INFORM - • • . . our current Gu to .� EO;�E'AHAT I*lcOPMED . . . - • • • 6 - How wOu3d y ra �� 3 � Tec- � 3 le�el of in-for•ma tion abou •. � - • • r er ed b�/ NCT AT A � �c.- . - • _ _ • 4 f at i o;�a 3. prop ams . o Dor4 T K�yO1�I /RE. LScD re are e C i t�� of Ehorev m ew 0_00_0 .c so mewh a i n i Y ou Yery irs. craned � rmed , or not at all . ton about Ci y ipal sourC2 °f i n forflai What is your p rirc ort:„jnities? reCTZ 3t ional programs and opP Changing M. •3g. 40. 41- The City of Shoreview has a land plan for the city Calle� the use "Comprehensive Plana" Before to d ay p were you aware of it ? In genera 1v fron what you ha v e heard or seers, do you approve or disapprove o & a oning and 1 and use decisions made by the C &y? Do you feel that Shoreview resiCents have an adequate oppor - runity for input into the zoning and land use decisionmaking process? Some people say that fur then i;=dus ia' and commercial development in Shoreview is needed to insure an adequate to ?: base and keep residential ro er tar ta::es down. C -hers fee 1 p l meet should be cur - tha., de �el�p tailed to preserve open spaces in the city. Which side do you most agree w i th ? AWARE ......._..._..._. 1 UNAWARE. _ _ 10 - 2 DCN'T KNCW /REFL'SED. _ _ - - 3 APPRCVE. -. 0_40_0_•_ -___ _ _1 DISAPPROVE..._- • -...? DCN P T KNOW /RE USED _ ..... 3 ADEDUATE . - a - _ . . . . . . . . . . . 1 I NADEQUATEA. . - a m KiN0W /REr 1c=D - _ - - - - rURTL ER DEVEL OPIM -ETINlT CURTA I L... . - - BOTH--- •- ...............3 NEITHER we meow wommoomedemo4 DON'T KNOW /REPUSED . - _ _ _ . 5 42e • t � attract more commercial de�/elopment, in �'� the C l .• � W - r �' t� to be _ Part c •view would you prefer wha : peer ., o , Shore i t placed? 43. 0000 How important i s i t that Shore- MG RTANT _ - _ VERY I• ►. C ..... _ . i _ _ - . _ 2 I MP flFTANT ren base view exp and its employ SOMEWHAT . iVC�' AT ALL IMF^R ;'HNT _ .. . • or tun i ties to to provide more opp DCW T KNCW /REF'tJSED - _ - - _ - 4 - • �-, -- isn or- WC1r r: in the c i .. � very imp or t. somewhat important• or not at all important? 440 In general , do Yru favor or oppose STRCN-:CLY FAVOR. - SOMEWHAT FAVOR incenives • pravzd ing de ,? 1 o mans % ....... 3 SCME:HAT OF8 %.w such as breaks and . caning - STF.ONGLY OPPOSE 4 e xc ept ions, to n ew c o maser (WAIT FOR cial developments? RES ONSE D And do you fee I s&.0ong l y that way? _ 4..� . o • oci -rem that � the City � is too D l T - .... - • - 2 ABOUT RIGHT..... . about ri ht, or not tough tough, 5 the City C ode NOT TOUGH ENOUGH* 0 - _ - _ . - 3 enough in en-forcing • DC T KNCW�REr =C!`SD - - - • • • 4 rl an such nuisances as improper -- garbage disposal, junk cars, and noise - _ ._ •- -4040 -- J IF "INCT TOUGH ENOUGH P's ASK: 46. Why do you feel that way? 4?� ITS t:�e past . have -you had City YES _ ...... ......... . . . .. j • . ec tors come to your NO am . ............. mama .. S Building Insp residence: DON'T KNOW /RE6 "r mama .. 3 IF "YES , " ASK 42. -ia woui.d you rate t:�e it help kF ulness -° very he l pT u 1 , somewhat helpful, or not at all helpful? 49. general, do you the Ci LY eTZ- forces its codes -fairly . and conrs- i s v2n t .1 y? VERY HELPF UL . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Sol&E;4HAT c�SLaFLL - - - mama . NOT AT ALL HELPFUL . - - - . . 3 DON'T KNCW /REFUSED . . . . . . 4 YEE................ . . . . -1 NO......................? DoN, T K *;0 -f FEE6 U o" mama .. G SHOREVIEW. 1 11 oameew a woo 01 50. When you place your re tur • I abe ? on a SA I ":T PAUL, ama. _ - - • . _ ... E add: ess car ma � 1 irc� 2s it say BOTH.•- ...--------- .....3 no t2 to a fr i end , do / .4 .Vhurzview . or �.�a�n t °aL3 NE1�; ER. .... _ ....... �. , • e? DC1�' T KNOW /P"i EED m a m P o l l owed by ..:he z ipcod .i.� : r: •� 1 uL 1 scat i Can <<T _ �. C L.t �.'.�i you t e I i me �. �, 2 o b: 46 -46 i city p ..a . ohor evi ew? th ftwo �S. Do you agree or d:sagre_ w3 this statement : °A goad Shari- . view park and recreation system w i l increase the value of my ropert� /." (WAIT FOR REOP NSE) p And do you -feel SIMC ";GLY that way? STRONGLY SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT STRONGLY DON 2T KNI AGPEE..........E D I SAGc-:SG . . . . . . . 3 DISAGREE.- - -._.4 5 0W /REF"L1E -• m a m a . . •r orevi ew, i s there one problem in �3. "thinking about t. a. fic in �h viate or oor& . - = � a;- t:�at t:�e City should try to alle particu� (IF "YE57 " ASK:) What is it? • r tractions on the use of it Wit♦ . choul d the Ci t'/ p i ace further res tract ions do you 3 akzs? t IF wyEE �" ASK:) w1hat fur t:ler res favor ? - a • �,. As you may know, plans are being PROPOSAL A - • - • • - - - - • 1 %no Y considered for the future up-- PROPOSAL B - • • • • • - • - - - • 2 grading c f Highway 96 through the PROPOSAL C• a a • . we a . . . . . • 3 city., Three proposals have been NONE OF T ' r i' E M . • ..... . . . . . 4 AL..L OF THEM (A) E:: P and Highway 0* 6 to a four- DC:`4' T KNOW /R FUSED . • 40 40 .. b lane highway; (B) Create a parkway with a wed i an strip; (C) MalKe minor improvements• such as wider shoulders. but- leave it es =zn (.&ally u�nchar%_q O-r t;-ie three proposals, wnich -do you MOST prefer? 5o• would you favor- or oppose the FAVOR.------ 40a40 00_•- 1 Y � Cit-I o : Shoreview, o f -: er ing pro- OPPOSE...... _ ..... w a a do 40 40._ fessional day care facilities to DON'T KNOW /REFUSED.... . 0 3 residents? _'' re any members o-r your household •YES- - - . • ... • - ... • 1 Jam. A , enrolled in school district -spon- NO..... • • .. - . - ... No ... - • -2 sored Y out: athletic programs? DON"T KNOW /REFUEL. _ _ ...3 IF "YES , " SK - A...r.. 57_ Which programs? 5S . Would you support or oppose a • STRCbNGLY SOMEWHAT SO�"�.. SUPPORT........ � SUPPORT ....... . t bored issue , or the comp 1 e ►. i on of the the development 1 opment of the �J SOMEHA T OPPOSE. 40 ... .... 3 . • city Park C y . System! (WAIT FOR Y STRONGLY OPPOSE. - _ . - - no W, . 4 RESPONSE) And do you feel Y . Dt�N' T K:�ICWIP.E.FUSED.... - . strongly that way? 'Where has been a proposal fc,r- the cans true t i o n of a Shoreview. Community Recreation Center. Do you favor or oppose its construe- t i o n? (WAIT FOR RES;'ONSE) And do you -Feel. strongly that way? 59. How much would you be willing to _ pay/ in additional property/ taxes to support the construction and operation of a Sharerifiew Commun- ity Recrea Lion Center? (START WITH CHOICE #4) Le t' s says would you be wi 11 ing to pay $60 per • - year ? - - ( MOVE TO NEXT CHOICE U . CR DCwr4 DEPENDING ON ANSWER - - . REPEAT FROCESj) - - • - -- _ . 7 STi •UNUL.Y rHvum• 0 40 0 - 40 40- 40 40 SOMEWHAT FA OR . • - . • - am .. 2 SOME'AHAT OPPOSE, . . . . . . . . 3 STRONGLY OPPOSE40 40 ..... _ .4 DON P T KNCW /RE =UEED.. _ ... 5 NOTHING . • . - . . . . . . . : . . _ . . 1 �2�................• -- -.2 0 ............. 0, - 0 --- -0 3 �c / J . 4040. • • • . • • • • • . • 4040... . S loom .............. _ 4040. 5 . $200M - - - • 49 • . . . • . . . . • - • _ • Q DON` T K, "4OW /REFUEED - - - • - . � . _4040..... - - - - • i 60_ • Would you be more Likely to MUCH MORE LIKE:_Y_ - - - - .. - I support a bond issue for the SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY - _ . . Community Recreation Center NO D I FF =REr :CE . _ . . - - - . _ . . 3- if the money were to be used DON "T KNOW /Fhc."=USCD .: _ _ *4 onl;.e for construction and a not op� er at I o f the facilities ? t WAIT FOR RE�6'O :SE And i s that much more likely or only some - `i rj V ? whato :i t I would like to read you a short 1 ist of -facilities which could €; be Ln lulled in the Center. For each oner please tell me i i4%-0- would be very likely? somewhat I =kely, or rot a t all I= I:eI`f that =r you car your family would uti l i =e i t . V Ry S0$M NOT AT D.k; . LIKELY WHAT AL.L RED . i' 61. i An Indoor- Swimming Pool? 1 2 3 4 63_ Ar-tS and Craft s Rooms? i 2 3 4 63. Senior C ti =erg Center? 1 2 3 4 t; $4. A Wrh irlpoo 1 Bath and spa? 1 2 3 4 5 A Fitness Center? 1 2 3 4 bb _ Rac due t Ba 11 Cou�r-ts? law 2 3 4 r; 67. An Ice Arena? 1 2 3 4 _ An Indoor Golf P`roc t3Cz Range? 1 g 2 3 4 69d, us p S ervi sed Day Care Fac i I i t i es? 1 ' � 4 2 -� ?O. Gymnasium? I 2 3 4 71. . , o�nmuni t Recreation eat i on Should the C y YES . _ - ..... ........ . .... 1 e y e community Center i:3clude a -i.ar� N�------- .. ... ........ ..3 room for banquets and p art i es • DON 7 T KNOW/RE-FUSED ... - .. 3 organization and community meet- inc, and other rental purposes? ?2. Parking p roblems, P articularly at peak times, are alwa�s re one locations perhaps at a stepping troublesome., Is the P 7. r o-f•;ice complex in Shoreview, that you find a center o p severe rD�?lern? (IF particularly p "YES," ASK:) Where is f, tliat7 . dMOM i; • 3. • Should the preserves tion of wet- CITY GOVE.RNMI AENT. _ ... 10 10.. 1 lands and large open spaces be STATE GOVERNMENT _ . . . _ ... 2 the primary responsibility of BOTH EDUALLY ............ 3 c i OR state government ? DON ? T K*aNg1C �I. &.0 Imo cD 10 10 _ 10 10 .4 A trar.ch o-r ,-he Ramsey County F:RST SEO3r1D Library system has been proposed for Shoreview. Four locations .for LOCAT "ION A I 1 the facility have-been mentioned: LOCATION H 2 2 (A) The in tersect i ors of Highway LOCATION C 3 3 _ 96 and Victoria Street; LOCATION D 4 4 (8) The intersection of F-ighway t' ONE 5 S 96 and Highway 4a : DON" T KNUCM d The in erse=t;ons o.f H iy;-;Wa;. 49? Rica Street, and Gransield: (D) The intersection of Lexington Avenue and Count! Road E. 74. j4hic ;j location do you mast preTer? 75. L+:;-:a t would be your second choice? ^ ' ; do owners be legally re-- YES ------- •......... -•••1 g uired �-o clean up a f ter their NOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 2 P el; s when trey are on ci ty -owned ? 1 r11 i = e c'" n DON T K O.OW RE. L...�..........3. property, such as porks? r Would - you -=a�Jor Q:- peep =2 a c = tY ord indree requiring dog owners to leashes while OPPCS= . • ............ _ DON'T KNOW/R1 E# USED - - - • • - 3 _ their pets on ke p in city parks? • ^� . Would c ti ; s st3^ ort or oppose the �,t o y � P SUPPORT. . . . . . ea-0 . . . 10.400 *1 OPPOSE _ 10 10 ... - 10 102 •'- ens i on of t:�e City -Shade Tree e�• 1010 - _ 10 10 ..... Di]r!' T KNOWlREFUSED... _ - .3 ' ease Control Program to trees Des on private property? ' 79a r oppose Shore - Would Zroc.� -favor o p. FAVOR . . . . . am . . . . . : . . . . . . 1 2 = w ins ti tutin a curbside pick- Vi 9 - OPPflSE.. - - • 40 40 - - • - • • - • • • • DON P T KNOW /RE =USE - - - - up of leaves instead of the cur rent city compost site? . sow .+ ., se an Llc�u�.r you avar or prep FAVOR . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . 10 10 .. 1 ' 2 increase in ci t� raper ty ta;:es i ncr e P OPPOSE a ......... - - • - • - • • DON 2 T KNOW/REPUSEJ • • • . • . 3 1 .c 4-1- were reeded to maintain i • v e --is ring city services? �'+s know property taxes are divided between the City of yoct. may , P � �P � hC?TeY2e�+re, Ramsey/ Court,, and your local school district. s 9 r el For ea ch dollar of proper tCy ta: :es UNDER TEN PERCENT. - . . . . . 1 • go you a aau t what perc2n rage do y p y iC : TO 24::_ 0000....... - .? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 21 : TO 30" .. you think goes to c i ty govern- •I -4 I.• • • • • . . . . - - - - 31.. T v I� en ., 41:. TO 5th............ _ .....� 1,: TO 60::.... 1 . . . . . - - .. S 61 : TO 70;:.---- .0.0.00.0 :' pVER SEVENTY PERCENT. - .. S DON'T KNCW/REFUScD .. _ ... 9 1 I of property ta::es ar 8`. For each do P p CINDER TEN PERCENT 0000 _ .. I a about what percer rage do YOU p y , 10:: TO 2rJ::...... • . - - - - ..2 t:-: ink cses to your local pug— YOU S 21 �. T.0 3t;::.... �. , .. ., . -� �+ 4t� . . . ....... . . . ..4 11c school ...r �. TD 00:--- •-- ..........� .............. TO 60:; b 61 ..... _.. V" .. �....... OVER P E4 ` C a4 T 0 0 0 0 S DON'T KNOW /REFUSED ...... 9 8..� For each dollar I 1 ar a•f property taxes UNDER. TEN PERCa4T . . you pay, about what percentage d% Y ? 000 0 .. - - • - • • - - - . � 10:: T3 20'' 21:: TD 30::.............. 3 you think goes to Ramsey Coun by . 31 ; TO 4.0':... - .......... 4 41:: TO �J::......... - - - 0%"# 51 : TO 6D • 0000... do - ... b 61.. ............. -... OVER SEVENTY PEF:CENT - - - • 3 DON 7 T KNOW /REF CEED . - - - - . 9 84 . Do you -feel that current bicycle ADEOt�ATE ................ 1 DEVELOP. 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 . 0 . . . 0 • L_ pa �hway s are adequa to for commun- DCN7 T K;tiiCW ••REFUSED ow 0 0 0 0 3 • • .- lty reeds, or should a recraa- t ional tr ai 1 system be developed . throughout the Shoreview? 8 0 }-Iow would you rate the general E XCE,_!_ENT..... -.000 M .. 1st 3 TZL3 C700D .. - .............. Ana +ntertance and upkeep of ex ,� R.... • - • 0000 - - ..3 ONLY FAIR,, ' c� c 3 �e at;�ways --- e�:ce �. I ent , bicycle P -f'ai or P'JCFc.............. - • • - - - '� Qod , only -, poor? DON 7 T KINOW /RE S�� 0 0 0 0 .. J . For each I �+c,u1d like to read you a 1 is t of a few city szrv�c2s. �e tz the l t r of ai whether you would one, please tel ♦ one y •fair t-a dual o r oar? service as eNrZel len t, good , only , p E X C GOOD FAIR POOR D . 86. Snaw Plowing - 1 2 3 4 87. Police protection. • t-z ra tection? 1 SS_ Fire p 2 3 4 0 10 • s ' EXC GOOD FAIR. POOR D.K. - $v„ Ci ty Street. repair and maintenance? 1 2. 3 4 J go. Coun t 1 road repair and maintanancz? 1 2 Cr 3 4 91. S t a to highway repair and maintenance? 1 2 3 4 92. Sewers and water? 1 2 3 4 93. Dr a nag a and flood co�n:rol? 1 2 � Cr 4 ... �+ �? Animal control? I 2 3 4 c � 4 How would d rate the general Y E: C2i_ =ENT . . _ . . _ 0 0 0 0 . _ . . . 1 appearance o-: your neighborhood GOOD .................... S - --- excellent, good, only •fair, ONLY Fr1IR........... _...3 car poor? P'OCR- •----- .........__..4 DON7T KNOW /REFUSED.. - - - . J 96. t:-;er than vat Inc 7 do you feel O _ YE5 ..•................... 1 that if you wanted to . you could NC _ .. _ . 0 0 0 0 ... _ 0 0 0 0 ... . 0" have a say about the way the City DON'T K*7%OW /REFUScD .. - _ .. S 2horeviewv runs thing =? ^' 9, H ow serious.... o f a problem do you VERY 2ERI QUS ............ i _ -fee 1 that the safe disposal of %No A"MW� -:A�' SEA :I OUS ........ 2 household ham ardous wastes, such NOT AT ALL SEP i OLDS ... - - • 3 • as discarded oil and paints. DON' T KN1OW/RE.7FU1%S.WED. - - - • .4 aeros al cans, and pes t i c i des • is in Shoreview — very serious. somewhat serious , or not at a l l serious? . The of Shoreview is currently considering City proposals for the disposal o-` recyclable ma t er i a 1 s such as g I as s. cans, and newspapers. 92- Do you cur :2nt�` separate these i/ / YES--- ••--- ••- ..- .......i NJ- c ciables from the rest of your re / •- •-- •- ......_._.....3 DON'T KNOW /REFUCED .. - .. . garbage? 99. -so v l e City instituted a curbside � � VERY L I K I E . Y • • - • • - - _ .. _ • • 1 • ck--u of racy clab les, how likely SOMEWHAT LIKELY..... _ _ ..2 pick—up � � - • ... ' :� the NOT AT ALL l..I Y.ELY 0000... 3 its i •. you would participate i program -- very/ likely, somewhat g,. DOr!'T KiyO:ri /F{EFi�SED...... • i t all likel ? likz +/, or no%. a.. Y 100. Do you or any members of your r. I YES._.---- •-- ......._... hold use an of A the cakes in house Y NO _...- ..........._...2 3 Shoreview -for recreation.? DCN' T KNCW /REFUSED . • _ - - . it a s • Are: there any lakes kes in Shoreview You would def initely no' use for _-ecr�atiasza3 purposes., t �F "`: ES s •• AS':�: i�ihic:z ores and why not" to the general � ZOE. How would you rate 9 cow exCSLLe'`3T..... _ ......... 1 GOB 2 quality of the lakes in St-,ore- .................... ONLY FAIR ........... - - - . 3 view for fislhing, boating, swim- t i ac t i v- �'CCR ........ - - - ......... 4 minQ. and other aqua► c • 1 d say exce 13 ent , -- D0N'P T N:;�;GW, RS- CE`D ..... . �,ou you i,. ♦ �. Y good, only f air 7 or poor 103_ Does your residence Curren t;y Y== .....................i �iC.-- -- i1 visible st:'eot hove a rend y •..................5 Doti 2b T KNOW.'RE US� . - - - - . 3 address •• i ted? address e„hib �. a areas in 1:10-be 104. A t night . are there er �1E3 •*• ............... _ ... 1 • -� onside- hazardous city tha,, you C �O- •---- •- •••-- •--- - -...e T KIP40W f F.,EFU3SD ...... 3 because o a l -MCI' street of lighting? 3 F N YES 9 " ASE%* : 1O�_ which areas particularly come to mind? _ -,.ter_ • •- �. -� . w more q uestions for demographic purpcszs Row, just' a .... in each of the following Could you please tell me ho w many people et' s start oldest t v r ou s live in your household. �- age g p you - agent. 106. First, persons over- bJ? -- adults? Joe. Hich School aged? _ ........... 10 9. Elementary and Junior High aged children? -- 310. pre-schoolers? - dw How many people residing in your household currently hold full' time wage--earning jobs? - 1� 1 � 112. • How many people currently hold F ar �- ime employment? 113. Appro:: ima Wel y in what C year was your : es idence cons t:-s:cted? How many bedrooms are contained in your residence? - 115. An "accessory apartment" is a sep- YES---------------- ---• -1 ara.e self - contained living un�.t- NOaWft---- ..- ..- .- .. -- -..2 in a larger residence. Does your D 0 N 2T K`11CW /FEF'JSED ... - .. 3 t-es:derace contain an "accessory apa trnen t "? 116 - Do you or anyone in this household YE5--- ••-- -•. - -- 0000....1 coa;dUct a -full -time business from 1110..... _ ... - • - - - - 0 0 0 0 - ..2 your residence? DON'T K1i0:r /REr= USE D ... 117. Do you own or rent your present OWN ----- ---- -- 0000- ---. -1 residence? RENT -- ..---- .- ••--- . -- -..2 REFUSED- .....--- .-- --- -.3 112 - How old are you, please? 12- 2'7-------- sees - . ---- -1 (READ CATEGORIES. IF NEEDED) 2� -44. - ... • - - - .......... 2 65 AND OVER0000...... -..4 P EUvED - • • • • - - • - • - • • - - • - 5 119. What is the occupation of the head of this household? 120- LESS THAN HIGH SCHOOL - - . 1 What is the last grade of school you completed? HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE . _ .. 2 • VO -TECH SCHOOL .. - - - - - - - . 3 SOME C O LLE G E - - - • - - - - - - - - 4 COLLEGE GRADUATE • - • - - - • - %NJ POST- GRADUATc....... -...b REFUSr•- .----- •- •-- ---- -7 • 121. Could you tell me your appro ;: i mate UNICER S 12 P 5A00 - - - - - - - - • - • 1 pre -ta ;: yearly household incomes $12.500 - $2 7 , 000 - - • • • - • 2 Does the income 1 ie- - - .. S25,001 - $30' 0 0 0 0 ...3 (READ CATEGCR I ES) :537 , 501 - S=07000 .... - .. 4 • S507001 - $62,500- 0 0 0 - -.5 $62,501 - $75000-- -- --.6 OVER $0-75 7 000....... - - - 0 0 DON7T K'sslOW--- •- •••- - - - -.3 REFUSEJ -- 00..000000--00-9 1 0 BEERIVATION: DO NOT ASK) MALE,& a do m m --- -.1 Sex (BY 0 sm FE341AL.E.IAT HOME do 0 a 0 • - ft - a 0 b.. work Do You IF "FE!wlsALEpn ASK: home? to Thank you very -much for your ti one ,0 el ...... WNM0WMb4NWW TELEPHONE NUMBER LIST I EWER, DATE 14 Minneapolis TAR Volume VI /Number 75 and CoWrW 1987 Wmapolis Star and Trib" Company "'Metro S' ' �. err �''• Thursda'y June 18i 1987 8 Sections 354 S ftle copy . 4 S rev ho i residen s find alm,,-, st . r n hin Ot g ."..to COM .1 bou. By Paul Gustsi , ti . , . • Stall' Writer ' � � city's quality of life as good or excellent, Shoreview residents can't fight Asked what they like least about • city hall because they're at a loss. -' the city, 40 percent said . to find anything wrong with their ; "nothing." �� Lt t northern Ramsey CouatY y, ; t�omamunit •' Y. 4 ' N . Shoreview residents love their streets, sewers, parks, snow - . About the only things Shoreview plowing, even their city ollicialsh lacks are good animal control and And if a tax increase is needed to .discontent, according to a recent maintain municipal services, 56 resident- attitude surve percent said thats OK with ith them, conducted for the city ly Decision Resources Ltd. a Minneapolis- based palling firm* They would, however, like to have more bike paths and a community , Ninety:eight percent of the 402 recreation center, something on the order of a health spa with a • ; Shoreview residents who were = poll-&a, fated theirlake - dotted ShOMI M continued on .page ?A and CoWrW 1987 Wmapolis Star and Trib" Company "'Metro S' ' �. err �''• Thursda'y June 18i 1987 8 Sections 354 S ftle copy . 4 f f _ Anoka Co. i I :sview t 1 Ramsey Co. Minneapolis St Paul t , Mississippi t % River _ Star and Tribun6 map orevi w e Continued from page 1A fitness center and whiriipl baths, susv cy respondants said. Decision Resources Pmsident W illia;.: Morris said that Shoreview's Civic J3 is not matched by nine other Twin Cities communities he's si r;reyed, and that its city government received the highest rati..gs recorded in the metropolitan ar t The 98 percent positive view of their qu iiity of life is "stunning," and the fact that 78 percent approve of the • job done by their local officials bodes well for its city council's political future, said Morris. "ShorevieVs positive raiinlgs tend to be IS to 20 percentage points bigher than other suburbs. In a second -ring suburb wc'd expert , .5 percent of the people to say they, dislilw. nothing. a. ` Thi uifference between that and 40 F_ perc�at is a quantum leap," he said. Mayor Dick Wedell said he and other urcil members .are flattered, if so „scwhat surprised, by the outpouring of warm feelings for city ►all. "H animal control is the biggest problem wz`ve got, that's good news. 't. do something about that, and wz hAznd to, Wedell said. "But mthat & you do for an encore? This (survey) makes it awfully tough.” So what nukes the 20,500 Shoreview residents so happy? City government must be doing many things right, but it's more than that, said Morns. ft's also the combination of the city's ' r,w►.::_Jh :.menities and development hist;, alth a population that fits Minneapolis Star and Tribune/ Thursday /June 18/1987 . 7A Staff Photo by Brian Peterson Shoreview Mayor Dick Wedell: "What do you do for an encore? This (survey) makes f# awfully tough." social scientists' definition of the "postindustrial society." Such a community has many high - income. high - education residents who are professionals or business owners and manages s who place a high value on their environment and health, and are willing to invest in schools and city services. Shoreview fits the description to a "T," according to his survey, said Morris. It has a $41,500 median family income, 42 percent of its residents have college degrcL- s, and 63 percent of its wage - earner s are professionals and businessmen. The survey also discovered that residents have an extremely high concern for the city's environment and for personal wellness, he said. Said Morris: "I've never seen the wellness movement so strong in terms of what people expect in a city recreation center. We're literally talkh4 aboc,,, ..:,:unicipal health spa -99 Familarity with city hall might breed contempt in some cities, but Morris said the survey indicates that Shoreview officials could make residents even happier through better communication. Residents overestimated the pei cent of their property taxes that goes to support city services, and the city staff's overall approval rating of 65 percent jumped to 83 percent with residents who had contact with city hall. What Shoreview residents s:;,:n most worried about, besides animal control, is that too much development will ruin their haven. Wedell has a similar concern. "One of the problems we can envision is that the survey is too glowing and too many people will want to move in." 4-11, AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager Armi.Ozu �� _° FROM: Public Works Director --_~ . __~== SUBJECT: Administrative Assistant 1(0d1fj DATE: May 19 1989 �--�=� Introduction .. _ The 1989 budget includes funds to add an administrative assistant t o the public works department. This request is submittuwd to receive' city council approval to actually fill the position. ou A job description for the proposed position is attached for review. It is evident from the job description that the emphasis for this position is in the areas of finance and coordination. Money For public improvements has continued to become more scarce. This requires better tracking, timing, and scheduling to efficiently use available funds. Currently, the engineering staff concentrates on engineering matters due to the amount of work in progress. The proposed employee would preferably not have an engineering background, but a business background. This .emphasis would ensure that due attention would be given t o the finance related issues for public improvements. The salary structure for the proposed position would be structured consistent with current AFSCME contracts. Recommendation It is recommended the city council authoriz_e filling the position of administrative assistant with the public works department. KGH jo / ' - . POSITION RESPONSIBILITY WRITE-UP Position Title: Administrative Assistant Date: August 1988 Department: public Works Accountable To: Director of Public Works ` Kajor Areas of ACCOUntabil.ity ' 1" Assist the director in planning, programming, and implementing public works projects, programs, and r ced . ' p o ures. ' Carry out special projects and studiesas deemed necessary ' by the director of public works. ' - Coordinate public works planning efforts. 2" Assist in preparation of departmental budget.` - Assemble budget preparation information. 3. Carry out administrative support services for engineering . and public works maintenance~ ` - Coordinate the maintenance of department files. . -- Review legal notices, advertisements, contracts, etc.,, for accord with state and local laws and city policies~ ' Assemble, document, and maintain department policies. - Implement and maintain project scheduling systems. 4. Assist director in monitoring department finances. - Review purchase requests in relation to annual budget. -- Coordinate departmental purchases and contracting in accordance with state laws and City purchasing policies. - Review and maintain project budgets. - Coordinate project financing with finance department. 5. Assist director in administration of state aid and federal grant programs. - Monitor status of state aid fund and coordinate department state aid functions. - Administer special grant programs of department. t' 6. Assist in preparation of department pub t i c relations mat er i a] . 7. Coordinate . data processing with Ramsey County. B. Administer diseased tree program. 9. Coordinate the preparation of city council agenda items related to public work s department. low Represent the department, when delegated, in meetings with other city departments, county and metropolitan . organizations. I i . Assume other duties as apparent or as delegated. Knowl ed a and SE; i l l s Fie wired Preferred Bachelor of Science Degree in Public or BUS i ness Administration . Two years experience in municipal administration or related field. (advanced Lousiness degree may. Substitute for e;:perience Additional appropriate experience may Substitute for degree. 0 E.•: t e n t of Su ery i s i can or Guidance Under general Supervision of director of public works . Pub l i c Contact L.imited., however, requiring high degree of tact, Courtesy, and sound judgment. Supervision of Others �•+•.M• W�Ili1AA•i�.�i • M IIYI I �� ^ M I ' None AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Stop Signs—Brookcs, and Barclay DATE: May 15, 1989 AGENDA ITEM Aotion by Council: Endorsed....- Modifies , Rejected..- Date'- A. number of. residents around the intersection of Brooks and Barclay have requested stop signs. Their request is in response to speed and traffic during activities at Harvest Park. Since the streets serve only the adjacent property and the park- parking I of no through traf f ic wool d be of f ected by stop signs . It is recommended that stop signs be installed in all directions on Broo'k-s and Barclay. KGH jw MAY r z 1989 May 6, 1989 Ken Haider . Public Works Department City of Maplewood We all live in the immediate area of the entrance of Harvest Park in the City of Maplewood. We have had a problem with the amount and speed of traffic entering the park on Brooks and Barclay. Small children live and play in the area. We (the undersigned) would like to see a three way Stop Sign put in on the intersection of Brooks and Barclay in an attempt to slow down the traffic before an accident occurs. Brooks Ave, 9562 3),eoo V 70 - 3G8o '�S't�i� 'J� �PSCln,i �- X --'l -A �?b - /5`3 3 70 99 eL 7 — 7 6,�O 7 0 zoo,, J� Iq 6.,�d �clC(�»ut�v�J k'16 v.�ecv�,M �ueo-Ficn4 2`t �Q C'P'��1a��In nj ��'i - ?S6 Z V E� 975 .32 •c of .(oDa•c n (44) (35) 32 ac� .Goa.,: (4e) (+ -150) 030 (41) h .32 ac (3a> (t 75) - Ref T t—; 1318.38' 5 / . (a0 ac . (-�) .32- ac •• - s3�•Pp (3 9 w i e1 003� ° 4 2 10° 6S»►c. r. arc �- (1) �, .sow a V) i 02 4.` oii t- 0+ Zia) C4) 017 1 p,9 o L cl (80) 140 , 30 dS h • n t �� 5% o ° 1 (3� :. (15) 03 Ln (4) o - 1 + D 150 4- n O ><` 6 '810. 115 ' . 41 ac. 05 c �o N NO �O 1 l °b D �# 14,8 1 6 3 9 /`1V E. V 110 C-) :� 7 30 ac. o °oZ 0Oz Soasq i -�°► -- — — — 0 its o 90 an .26ac .15 ac. - .37aC. d) < 00 (72-) S t- 090 p60 N '� L. 0)) 06 06 .J 2� . 35 ac (71) V (73) Qo' 2.2 B c. Y �Z ,00 o c .) 5/5, 2 3S � C. Q An 1 5 0 m rn 4 o jG 70' ~ 3 389' 3 0 GIs' I 75.03 1G2.2G Go 9o.8s G0 75 �.0 75 75 7o m iC. 94.1♦ j� , t�� 3fe -0,W k . (2 7) . eta a 3 0 1 8 7 6 5 41 3 2 ._, ► .13M,c a S 2 (47) (33) ~ (32)- (31) (3p)2 (24) (28) • (2`) ` (48) .,4 d10 �o is � �D co G 7S ?5 TO 95 N ti 1 3 SEXTANT AVE V _ 3 � � • ?5 F((; at t of Minn. (4`i) 139•z 75 T5 7S 7S 79 75 sT'avc� Pik V tt2, � Qy11.14 - ��). (62).r 4 9 1- c M o Coo) M CaB (a-t) 1 2 0 3 �• �4Z) 9 •; ,. (41) S (37) . (36) _ i35) N (34) N �, so 10 '0 Ito. s I r co . 07 - 39) o� � _ P � 2 I ��.o TS 4l.ga 33 3 g5.�5' �' S a• 506• v 5(51) (43) 10 8 - -'♦ - - -- - - -� - - -- _ _ K t6v.ec• 1 s. s Ito 12 S.7G... ?S , 6 J 5 4 N 3 .5/ ac g l j ��s.�` MAIN ( Po . R.Sos• 6• c (52) r' t $ TIL1T -' 2 1 90• e6' X14' sb•1 6 (44� , II ES T. Zo �.�• (55) t 1q.st 75 (.o 75 T5 75 � � N a m S Q �ot.� • • • 19 9 • A S' ' 6 2 3 N 44 (-5r.) s ) �(4_/I 12 S 3 - is - ° - ap -- - E o 34. A S3 J �, -� - Bs' r, r, r� co C AVES GE�`RV I S (67-) n ( (53) <s 4) 8 6.2; C�1) 11 D V 101.11 It. 7 a 54 4b s �i �' 3 M 4 N 5 9 6 (SI) (50) (�) QW, O Q O N N n a 64) , nt � 9) � N � r 14. 13 12 r � 8 03 J nJ 8 r r I'•S r (54) (.V7) 3 (S8) D tai , (a 1) Z! K (63) r: - � e - (4.8) - cA cA � Ito GQ 101.71 75 $O el 0 13,2 41; 0 moo' Ate' 96' 1 QS' NS' x365 ,..,„ ,....• ..... " ""_' 365 ' _'_':. -"_' •� - - ----- - - - _ "� �'� C] 1 1 A 1 S- t�K - - 3. 87.06 64' 6 19.9 5 8 4 8 S�j 4 3' 4 3 0 >� 31' 84-- �v . ' , ,►sue•. � I Q� ' AGENDA I TEh1 AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: TO: City Manager Endorsed...... Mo d i f i e d.C... ,,,_,_, . FROM: Assistant City Engineer ]Rejected Date 81J8JECT : Keller Parkway-County Road C Water Main, Project 8 -10 Approval o+ Plans DATE: May 15, 1989 The plans + or the subject improvement will be available for review and .approval at the council meeting. The attached resol ut i on estab l i shes a date for receiving bids, FAA I is Attachment RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS pursuant to resol ut i on - passed by the c ity counc i 1 on Apr i 1 24, 1989, p I ans and spec i + i cat i on f or Kel I er Park way_ County Road C Water Main,. Project 88-10, have been prepared by the city engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT"RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD7 MINNESOTA: in $uch plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the off ice ,o+ the city clerk, 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the off icial paper and in the Construct ion Bulletin an .advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be pub ished twice, at 1 east ten days' bef ore the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids wil.1 be publicly opened and considered by the council at 9 a.m., on the 23rd day of June, 1989, at the city hal I and that no bids shall be considered .unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified' check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. .1. O. The city clerk. and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids receivpd at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received, AGENDA ITEM 1-1.-(6 AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: TON City Manager Endorsed..- ...,,- ..�..,,. FROM: Assistant City Engineer Modi fied SUBJECT: Brooks Avenue Water Main Project e - 0 Rejected � ct 88 �8 Approval o+ Plans Date— DATE: May 15, 1989 The plans + ors this project will be presented at the council meeting f orb approval. The attached resolution sets a date +or receiving bids. BAI is Attachment RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on April 1 C, 1939 , plans and s p ec i f i c at i ons for Brooks Avenue Water . Main , Hazelwood Street to Germain Street Project erred b the � 88 -GS , have been prepared Y city engineer, neer , who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for roval PP , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY CITY OF h�A�'LE WOO t COUNCIL OF THE , MINNESOTA: is Such plans and...spec if icat ions , a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby ordered placed an file in t ' approved and he office i ce of the city clerk, 24 The city clerk shat l prepare and cause to be ' Q the official paper and in inserted . P P the Construction Su 1 1 et in n an advertisement for bids upon the malting of such improvement under such approved plans and spec i f i cat i ons . The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten 'days before the date t o set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that . will be publicly opened a at bids Y a P and. considered by the council 1 at 9 a.m., on the 16th day of June, 1989, at the city hal 1 and that ' t na bids shat 1 be considered unl e ss seal ed and f i 1 ed with the cl erk and accompanied by a certified check; or bid band a . ... f Maplewood, ewaod h�inn � payable e t© the City P , esota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3a The city clerk and city engineer authorized are hereby and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids . ds race x ved at .the time and place herein "rioted , and to tabulate the bids rec e i ved , .� � ' Action by Cmuoollx "=°~O.�`N`~=., Eodorsed~_~~�.~_~�� M�dif� TOo City Manager ="-�~_�_~� FROM: Director of Com�nityDeve1opment ]� � SUBJECT: Code Amendment-RE District DATE: March 23, 1989 � Councilmember Bossbach requested this amendment to clean up some outdated Ianguagem. This amendment would have no substantive effect on the City code. The current language implies that used car lots and wrecking yards are permitted accessory uses in the R-1, single-dwelling residential district. This is not correct. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance. mb/REordin.mem Attachment: Ordinance ^^ ORDINANCE NC AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY USES IN THE RE, RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1~ Section 36-87..-.' is hereby amended as follows (deletions are crossed out)� ' Section 36-82. Accessory uses. Prohibited uses~ Any accessory use permitted in an R-1 Residence District (single dwelling) is permitted in the RE, residence e�tate district. c�cepf:-� ^ f2� Mf-auLomnb -ifes-or-LrLt1W_ks-inCf "dims -tine Any prohibited use in the R-1 district is prohibited in the RE district. Section 2" This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 1989. ATTEST: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- Mayor Iar ~ng Commission -4- Minutes 4-3-B9 �� ~~~..~~-_-_._ ---. , seconded Ayes--A>.,.da 1 Barrett ardinal so MUndik, Sletten ' _ . The staf f rep t was presen and diSCUssed with the commissioners. e applic nt was not present at COMMiSSiDner meetingm Ayers m d the Planning Commission ' recommend denial ^, code variations., ode varl ce and "rela)-,,.ed urban" street, --- 's that the pr osed lots are not c sistent with the City Critical ea P1 an. State law pro its approval of devel ts that are i�consistent i l . Area n . sioner Fischer seconded Ayes- Ayers, ` -- Barrett, C dinal , Dempsey, Fi ^' Fischer, Lars Sigmundik, Sletten D, Code Amendment: RE District The staff report was presented and discuSsed. Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the ordinance pertaining to accessory uses in the RE, residential estate, districts) Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten VII UNFINISHED BUSINESS A, Sou ds Apartment is Revis* of Conditional Use Permit north of the ite ditional Use Permit project Preliminary Plat ` Action by OozozciIc. MEMORANDUM TO: City Managsr - ied FROM: Director o+ Community Development --------�'~~�- Rejected ��_~�_~�_~~� SUBJECT: Code Amend�oent ~ Noise Ordinance --~ DATE: May 12, 1989 Date The City Councli I gave +Irst reading to this ordinance on May 8. This ordinance has caused considerable and often angry complaints +rom contractors. The complaints are not aimed at the intent of the ordinance, but at three procedural requirements: 1,The thirty-day renewal requirement 2. The $10 permit fee 3. Having to get a separate noise permit from the Clerk's office, in addition to the building permit. This often involves waiting in line at the clerk's counter. The intent of the permit is to make sure that contractors are aware of the noise permit. A better solution would be to simply attach a copy of the ordinance to the building permit and require the contractor to sign the ordinance, acknowledging that he or she has read and understood it. The e+fective hours of compliance have been changed from 10x00 p.m~ through 7:00 a.m. to 7x00 p.m. through 7x00 a.m. and all day Sunday. An appeal process is included to allow exceptions. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance. MEMO4 Attachment: Ordinance ft ORDINANCE NOW AN ORDINANCE AMENDING .THE MAPLEWOOD CODE PERTAINING TO NOISE PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION Section 1. Article III of Chapter 19 2'S. amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions crossed out) � ARTICLE III. NOISE CONTROL* Sec" 19-48. Prohibition generally; exception. No person shall make or cause to be made any distinctly and loudly audible noise that unreasonably annoys, disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety or "el+ar*w of any person or precludes their enjoyment of property or af+ects their property's value. If the event or activity is sponsored by the City or authorized and has a permit for such activity issued by the City, this prohibition does not apply. This general prohibition is not limited by the specific restriction of the following subdivision. Any violations of this general prohibition, and 7:00 a.m., is a of this article (Ord No 611 01 10-15-87) T*he City Manag r, r his or her desianee,__may waive this reguirement where the activity -would not CaUse a nuisance and' where the _proposed- activity would not be within 350 +eet o+ a residential usen The City Manager-s decision may- be appealed to the C3*.--ty___COLtnc3*.l The property owners within 350 +eet o+ the proposed activity shall be noti+ied o+ the appeal at least ten days- be+ore the Council meeting. A I ist o+ the property- owners,.. cert i+ ied by_ an abstract company- or- the County -abstract o++ ice..,.. shal I be submitted with the appeal application. per se violation ~ ^ ^ v , Sec, 19-49. Domestic power equipment. The normal operation of domestic power equipment shall not be subject to the noise level limitations in Sections 19-48 and 19- 50. Domestic power equipment, as used herein, means power lawn rowers, hedge clippers, edgers; chainsaws; garden tillers; mulchers; and power saws, drills, hammers and sanders. (Ord. No. 611, � 21 10-15-87) Sec. 19-50. Construction activities. Al I construction activities. including-t-h-e-use o+ any kind of electric, diesel or gas-powered machine or other power egui.pments_ shall be subject to theprovisions o+ this article. A col2y- + this article shall be attached to each such construction p rmit issued --by he Cit-Y. The ap-pl icant +or said permit shall be reguired to s-ijan said col2y-IL acknowledg-ing that he or she has read and understood it, be+ore a germit can be released. tion -act+ v +t4.es ;- -them — sm d-+n-t+ist- event- -h e-or-she- she++ - have-t he-r +gin t theG+ erka -up Om -a-+ orm-preser+ bed-hy-th e-E+t Y-Gaumci+ sees- +m-voh used-+Or-com struc ti am -act +Vity-w CoqtApment --a -app es+ The-epp +ic sti am -dese rib ed -*n - subsecti-on ++cant eqtApmei I ad -b y-the-e+ ty- eoume+ +- -b Y-reso+ tit +on- Sec. 49-32: Enforcement, �(a) Police department to enforce article provisions. The Maplewood Police Department shall enforce the provisions of this article. The Maplewood Police Department or its members may inspect private premises other than private residences and shall make all reasonable efforts to prevent violations of this article. (b) Civil remedies. This article may be enforced by injunction, action for abatement, or other appropriate civil remedy. (c) Noise impact statements. The Council may require any person applying for a change in zoning classification or a permit or license for any structure, operation, process, _ installation or alteration, or project that may be considered a potential noise source to submit a noise impact statement on a form prescribed by the Council. It shall ' evaluate each such statement and take its evaluation into account in approving or disapproving the license or permit applied for or the zoning change requested. (d) Criminal penalties. Every person who violates any provision of this article is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall , upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than .seven hundred dollars ($700.00) or imprisonment for a term of not to exceed ninety (90) days, or both, plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution. Each act of violation and each day a violation occurs or continues constitutes a separate offense. (Ord. No. 611, 51 10-15- 87) Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by COUncilmember Passed by the Maplewood City Council 3 on 1989 . ATTEST C i t y C 1 erg:: Ayes -- Nays r,� Mayor Action by Councils MEMORANDUM Endorsed TO: City Manager Modifierl FROM: Envi r on men tal Health 0++icial Rejected- SUBJECT: BUSINESS CLEAN-UP Date DATE: May 159 1989 Ctouncil member Bastian requested that sta++ contact the Chamber in regards to coordinating a business clean-up with the hazardous waste collection day, I contacted Arline Vickers +rom the Chamber o+ Commerce regarding a business clean-up program. Her best suggestion was to have a slide presentation or speaker speak to their association. I do not think this would accomplish muci-I s the probl em p aces are not I ikel y to be members o+ the Chamber. We should handle the problems on a case-by-case basis, a as we have in the pst . M107! TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Action by Council:, Endorsed MEMORANDUM Modified.... Rejected..-,.--. 0 City Council Planning Commissiong Communitya"tqesi Review Board, HRAI Parks Commission, City Manager and Department Heads Director of Community Development Comprehensive Plan Update May 15, 1989 Your help is needed to update the City's Comprehensive'Plan . I The first and most important step is to identify and prioritize the most important issues and problems . with the development of the City. This can only be done by the City"s key decision makers. The best way to do this is to schedule a joint work session a We will 1. d i v 31 de i nto smal I groups brainstorm" ideas and then vote on the most important ideas. This should be a fun and productive session. Since each of you are an important part a+ the City's decision-making process, it is important that you attend thi* session$ contribute your ideas and help us to reach a decision on which development issues we should be focusing on in the next few years, Please check which of the +all caw ing dates is best for you: Saturday mourningg June 10 Thursday evening, June 15 Saturday mourning, June 17 Would you also answer the +allowing questions: 1. What parts of the Comprehensive Plan are most useful to you? 2. What changes to the Pl an wool d make it more useful to you**-.-, 3. How often do you use the Comprehensive Plan? (Check one.) Dail y I Week 1 y - Month I y Yearl y Never MEM05 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY .JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI Mr. Michael McGuire City Manager Maplewood City Hall 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 224 -3781 May 9, 1989 Re: Ledman vs City of Maplewood, et a1 Dear Mr. McGuire: I ECEIVE �I Action by CcuncilT Endorsed _A.. Modified..., Rejected ....Rr, r.�...._ f Date Please find enclosed a copy of a Stipulation of Dismissal with respect to the above - referenced litigation. This document was received in this office on Ma y signature 9 for si ture and g transmittal to the next party. You may wish to. refer to my letter dated April 18 setting forth the terms of the proposed settlement. Patrick has asked that this matter be placed on the agenda before the Council for approval so that we may execute the Stipulation as part of the settlement. As I had mentioned earlier, this lawsuit arose out of injuries suffered by a volunteer firefighter durin g a training exercise. The lawsuit sought more than $50,000 in damages. Ultimately, the matter was tentatively settled with Maplewood and the fire department each contributing $800.00 in exchange for dismissal. The City of St. Paul Park made the largest contribution towards settlement of the action. The file and the terms of the proposed settlement have been discussed and reviewed by the City Attorneys. The City Attorne y g s strongly recommend approval. of this Stipulation as a reasonable and cost - effective means of resolving, this litigation. Please advise me once the City Council has acted on this agenda item JH: ks Enclosure Sincerely yours, f t STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON Marguerite Ledman, Plaintiff, vs Ashland Oil Company, Inc.,, Defendant, and City of St. Paul Park, Minnesota Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, DISTRICT COURT TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Court File Nos. C7 -88 -364 & CX -84 -3301 STIPULATION.OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL w vs. City of Maplewood, Minnesota and Gladstone Fire Department, Third Party Defendants. � -. war---- r- �----------------------- rr.. wr--- r- rrrrrww- w..rr- .wrrr.irw.�r -- IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED b and between een the parties hereto, through their respective counsel that the above entitled action, including all third art claims P y , counter claims and cross claims, may be, and the same hereby is, dismissed with prejudice and on the merits but ' without further cost to any of the parties hereto. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that an art Y party, without notice to another, may cause judgment of dismissal with prejudice and on the merits to be entered herein. - 1 - f� Dennis L. Brigue t ( #11514) Andrew Dunne nne DENNIS L. BRIGUET AND ASSOC. FAEGRE AND BENSON Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Ashland Livingston Avenue Y Oil, Inc. 1700 Livin g v nue 2200 Norwest Center Suite 205 60 South Seventh Street West St. Paul, MN 55118 Minneapolis MN 55402 -3 � 901 (612) 455 -0000 (612) 336 -3000 Dennis Be Johnson ( #124564 ) ,..CHESTNUT & BROOKS, P.A. Attorney for Gladstone Fire Department 3700 Piper Jaffra y Tower 222 So. Ninth St. Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 339 -7300 James J. Hanton ( #175717) .BANNIGAN & 'KELLY, P.A. Attorney for City of Maplewood 409 Midwest Federal Building 5th and Cedar Streets St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 224 -3781 Ja es F . Sh i e ly, r. #100390 RIN & SHIELY, P.A. Attorney for City . of St. Paul Park 500 Degree of Honor Bldg. St. Paul, MN 55101 -1073 (612) 227 -7577 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL Based upon the foregoing Stipulation • p for Dismissal with .Prejudice entered into b • y the parties and upon all of the files records and proceedings herein IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That the above - entitled action is hereby dismissed with r p ejudi.ce and on the merits, without further cost to any of the parties hereto 2 - AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael McGuire From: Chief of Police Kenneth V.. Col 1 i ns,.�e,�� Subject: Revocation of Motorized Recreational Vehi c.1 e Permit Date: May 16, 1989 Introduction .lotion by CounoilOd Endorse Modifi ed_...,....�.. Rejected __...�..�,.....�. Date On March 21, 1989, a motorized'. recreational vehicle permit. was issued to Lucille M. Hause, 2090 E.. Co. Rd. D. The permit allows the operati on - of .two to three two— or four—wheel-recreational vehi cl es�.. Background Since this permit was issued in March, we have received no fewer than ten complaints to this.location. Complaints have been for excessive dust,. violation of motorized recreational vehicle permit, noise, excessive number of vehicles, etc. In most instances, by the time the squads- were able to get to this location, the activities had ceased. During the recent rains, this area has become extremely muddy and has been opened up for another activity, which in-my estimation is a violation of the recreational vehicle permit. This recent-activity has been four—wheel—drive pickups driving and racing through the mudded areas.. Again, by the time the squads arrive at this location, most of this activity has ceased. However, on several occasions, four—wheel—drive pickups were observed by officers stuck in the mud at this location.' In most instances i n . cal 1 s to this location, we are f i ndi'ng that the people who are in operation there are.not residents at 2090 E..Co. Rd. D.. On, April 19, 198.9, two users were from Mahtomed i , Minnesota, one was from White Bear Lake, and two others were from varying areas in Maplewood. Recommendation The motorized recreational vehicle course in this neighborhood is not condu- cive to a residential area. It has not only created a great strain on the neighbors, but it also requires a great deal of police monitoring and time spent for what should be a low — priority call. I am recommending that, based on the past history and based-on the numerous number of complaints that we have received and continue to receive, this motorized recreational vehicle permit be revoked and that no further permits be issued to this area. Action Required City Manager issue letter of revocation tothe Hause family and-refer the matter to the City Council for their concurrence.. KVC: j s AGENDA REPORT fi- /3 To: City Manager Michael McGuire .� .Action by Council ::J From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Col 1 i ns e mac_ Subject: Changing Part -T*i me CSO /Paramedic to Fu 11 -Time CSO /Paramgd4orsed Date: May 16, 1989 Modified Re j ecteA Introduction Date so ft 900M The 1989 Public Safety budget allowed owed for the hiring of. two art -time . p CSO /Paramedics. Two part -time CSO /Paramedics had been employed by the Police Department,and essentially the hours were structured so that we would have full -time coverage.by these two people. One of our part --time CSO /Paramedics resigned as of April 18, 1989, to take a similar full-time position-with another city, In the short time that -we;have had the part -time CSO's, it has become evident that we would be a training ground for other services to hire our part -time Paramedics to a full -time position. I am requesting that we not replace-the one part -time position and instead we make the remaining part -time CSO /Paramedic into a full -time CSO /Paramedic position. The two part -time CSO /Paramedic positions were permanent part -time and were receiving benefits according to that schedule. The cost for the two part - time positions was a total of $19,048 vs. the cost for one full -time position, which is $23,675.- The additional costs are the result ,of insur- ance and retirement benefits. for this full-time position. Recommendation I would recommend that the Public Safety Department be allowed to change the status of our remaining part -time CSO /Paramedic and create a full -time CSO /Paramedic position, I would further recommend that $4,650 be transferred from the Contingency 9 y Fund to cover the additional costs of this individual becoming a full-time employee. Action Required Review and approval by the City Manager and refer to the City Council for their review and approval, KVC: j MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community nevelop men t SUBJECT: R-3 District DATE: May 11 1989 Action by Counall1x Endorsed„.... .Modified......,.. Rej ected.,... -Date The City Council on April 20, requested that part of the City code be presented for review at each Council meetingg starting with the R-3, multiple dwelling, district. The R-3 district is I attached, along with a zoning map showing the existing R4MM3 districts. An inventory of exisiting and planned R-3 zones is also includedn Any proposed changes to the code should be referred to the Planning Commission. kd/R-3.mem Attachments ,is R-3 District 20 R v -3 Inentory 3e Zoning Map (separate attachment) ZONING § 36 -108 DIVISION 5. R -3 RESIDENCE DISTRICT (MULTIPLE DWELLING) Sec. 36 -146. Multiple dwelling classifications. Multiple dwelling structures permitted within an R -3 Residence District shall be classified as follows: Classification Structure containing R -3A .............. 3 to 17 units R -3B ............. More than 17 units R -3C .............. Townhouses, as defined in section 36- 124 of this division. (Ord. No. 245, § 906,10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -107. Definition. For the purposes of this division, "apartments" are defined as multiple dwelling structures consisting of at least three (3) attached dwelling units having entrances from common hallways. (Ord. No. 465, § 906.000, 4- 19 -79) Cross reference —Rules of construction and definition& generally, J 1 -41 et seq. Zo Sec. 36 -108. R-3 districts— Permitted uses. / G • ZT In a -3 Residence District (Multiple Dwelling), un!pg other- wise provi in this chapter, no building or land shal ereafter be erected or stru orally altered, except for one or a of the follow- ing uses: (1) All uses permit in divisions 3 an of this article, R -1 and R -2 Residence Dist ' ts, except ngle - family dwellings, du- plexes or double bung ess specifically authorized by the city council. (2) Multiple dwellings, asset forth ' sections 36 -118 through 36 -120 of this divisioin (R -3A), sectio \cl*fications ough 36- 1'23 of this division A-0), and sectiod 36 -125 of this division �FOQ, setting forth t of such dwellings b size and by type. Any pnduct busi- ness in multiple dwelling structures ited to such business use as the council may authorize at i time of approval of construction plans and specifications. Supp. No. 4 2223 7v W Of 6 z 7 ., y accessory use permitted in an R -1 Residence District (single dwelling) is ermitted in the R -E Residence Estate District, except: (1) sed car lots. (2) The rec g kin of automobiles or trucks including the sale of used cars. Any prohibited us in the R -1 district is prohibited in the R -E District. Section 5. Section 3 6 (R -2, Double Dwe ding District) is hereby amended as follows: Section 36 -86. Uses. ' a. Permitted uses. The onI} rises permitted in the R -2 Residence District are as follows: 1. Any permitted us in the R -1 istrict. 2. Double dwelli gs . b. Conditional u s. The following uses may permitted by conditional use permit: 1. An y e permitted ermitted by conditional use permit the R -1 District. Section 6. Se tion 36 -94 is added to the R -2 District: Sec. 36-94* Minimum floor areas . Xunshall nimum habitable floor area for each R -2 Residence District 'dwelling be at least: five hundred eighty (580) square feet per efc or one - bedroom unit; seven hundred forty (740) square feet per y - e feet er three - bedroom droom unit; eight hundred sixty (860) squat p unit; one thousand forty (1,040) square feet per fou r-bedroom unit* Section 7 Section 36 -108 (R -3 Multiple Dwelling District) is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36 -108. Uses. a. Permitted uses. The only uses permitted in the R -3 District are as follows: 1. Multiple dwellings, including double dwellings. 2. Any use permitted ermitted in the R -1 District, except single- family dwellings. b. Conditional uses. The following uses may be permitted by conditional use permit: ' 1. An y use permitted by conditional use permit in the R -1 District 2. Boarding or lodging house, except a hotel or motel. 3. 'Nursing home. c. Prohibited use: a single - family dwelling. Se tion B. Sec. 17 -21 to 17 -25 (Home occupations) is hereby amend as fol ws: S�ecti 17 -21. License requirements* ome occu atiores sh. all require a license if any of a following _ (8) p q c ' rcumstances would occur more than 30 days each y ar. • f R 10 pl.oyment of 8 nonresident in the home occ ation. 2. Cu)5xomers visiting the premises. ,. 3. Manufacture of products on the premises 4. More thai- one vehicle associated wit /the home occupation which is cla ssif d as a light commercial ehicle. 50 A vehicle {s) ed in the home occ ation, and parked on the premises, which \exceeds a three- arter ton payload capacity. \ (b) Home occupations requi 'ring a l.icen shall be subject to, but not limited to, the followig require nts: 1. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes than would normall /be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need`` off-street parking shall not ex- ceed more than three of f?�treet parking spaces for home occupa- tion at any given time., / in" addition to the parking spaces re- quired by the residents. 2. No more than one nonresident a loyee shall be allowed to work on the premises. Nonresident emplo ees who work off premises may be allowed to visit e premises. 1, an on -site employee is parking on -site, off -site employees shall t leave their vehicles on site. If there is no -site employee veh1 le parked on -site, one off- site employee ehicle may be parked o -site. 3. No vehicle associated with the home occ pation, including customers or employees, shall be parked on the st et or block sidewalks or public easements. Private vehicles used y the residents shall not be included in this requirement. 4. An area/ equivalent to no more than twenty ( ) percent of each level /of the house, including the basement an garage, shall be used yin the conduct of a home occupation* 5. There shall be no change visible off premises in he outside a pearance of the building or premises that would 'ndicate the onduct of a home occupation, other than one sign m eting the equirements of the City sign code. 36 -108 MAPLEWOOD CODE (3) Clu lodges, fraternity and sorority ho s which do net offer p lic accommodations. (4) Boarding a lodging houses. (5) The following - s pursuant special use permit granted by the council on a Iication nd hearing -as provided in article III of this chapter: a. Hospitals, clip' s nursing homes and other buildings used for treat ent human ailments. b. Philanthropic and ch itable institutions. c. And of r use enumer ed or specified in article III of this efiapter relating to special use permits. (Code 1965, § 906.010; Ord. No. 245, §�),10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -109. Same— Off - street parking. Each multiple - dwelling unit in the city shall have off - street parking space. Parking spaces shall be in addition to, and not part of, the driveways or maneuvering space necessary to the parking areas serving such multiple dwelling. All parking spac- es, driveways and other parts of the parking facilities shall be dust free and shall be surfaced with concrete or blacktop. Park- ing requirements shall be as follows: (1) An open parking stall shall be a minimum distance of fifteen (15) feet from a dwelling unit window and five (5) feet from any side or rear property line. (2) Parking stalls may not be located within fifteen (15) feet of a street right-of-way, unless section 36 -22 applies. (3) Where a garage or carport opens to a public street, the width of the driveway onto that public street shall not exceed twenty -four (24) feet in width, and in no event shall a. series of garages open directly to that street. Where a series of garages face each other on a private road, the minimum width separating garages shall be thirty (30) feet. in order to provide visibility in backing out or turning around. (4) Parking shall also be in accordance with section 36 -22. (Code 1965, § 906.070; Ord. No. 231, § 1, 10 -5 -67; Ord. No. Supp. No. 4 2224 ZONING § 36 -111 245, § 4. R 906.030), 10 -3 -68; Ord.. No. 5.55, § 2, 11- 28 -83; Ord. No. 585, § 5, 8- 26-85) Sec. 36 -110. Same — Indoor storage spaces. A minimum of one hundred twenty (120) cubic feet of storage space, in addition to normal closet space, shall be made available for each multiple - dwelling unit. Such storage space shall be lo- cated in the same building as the dwelling unit or in the garage, but shall not be considered as part of the habitable area of a dwelling unit. If located in the garage, it shall be enclosed and shall not be part of the automobile parking area. (Ord. No. 245 § 5 (§ 906.040), 10 -3 -68; Ord. No. 577, § 1, 1- 28 -85) Sec. 36 -111. Same — Exterior surfaces. (a) All multiple dwellings in the city shall be designed and con- structed to have the equivalent of a front on each exterior surface. Supp. No. 4 1 2224.1 ZONING § 36 -114 (b) All accessory or ancillary buildings to multiple dwellings in the city, including garages and carports, shall be designed and con- structed to have substantially the same exterior surface as the prin- c.ipal use building. (Ord. No. 245, § 6 (§ 906.050),10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -112. Same— Accoustical controls. In all multiple dwelling buildings in the city, the following stand- ards of accoustical control shall apply: (1) All P lumbing serving each unit shall be separated from other units by a room, closet, corridor or sound barrier. (2) Party partitions and floor systems shall be of a type suffi- cient to accomplish a loss in sound transmission of not less than fifty (50) decibels determined by averaging the loss at frequencies of 125, 250, 350, 500, 700, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 cycles. Corridor partitions shall be capable of accomplishing a loss in sound transmissions of not less than forty -five (45) decibels similarly determined. (Ord. No. 245, § 7 (§ 906.070), 10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -113. Same -- Garbage, refuse, etc., containers. All refuse, rubbish and garbage containers serving multiple dwell- ings in the city shall be placed at the rear of the premises. In no event shall such containers be placed next to the street or curb, nor shall they be placed so as to interfere with the use of adjoining property or to cause a nuisance or annoyance to adjoining property occupants. Such containers shall be covered and maintained so as to be inaccessible to insects, vermin or animals, and shall be screened so as not to be visible from eye -level height. (Ord. No. 245, § 9 ( § 906.080),10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -114. Same— Density credits. All multiple dwelling structures constructed in the city are subject to minimum area and maximum density standards as set forth in sections of this chapter relating to density and area requirements. The following credits to such standards shall be allowed as follows: Supp. No. 2. 2225 136-114 MAPLEWOOD CODE (1) Underground parking. The net acreage for calculating den - sity may be increased by three hundred (300) square feet for each parking space that is provided under the principal use structure, or in some other manner underground, which will thereby permit use of the grade level outside the build- ing, or above such underground space, for other building, parking, open yard or recreation space. (2) Open space: The net acreage for calculating density may be increased by one hundred (100) square feet where twenty- five (25) percent of the entire area is reserved in one area for recreation play area, or for open land, water or ponding areas subject to approval by the city council after consid- eration by the community design review board. (3) Landscaping. The net acreage for calculating density may be increased by one hundred (1,00) square feet for each dwelling unit where one percent of the construction cost (n, o including land cost) is allocated to the planting of trees. ThLis does not, apply to the sodding or seeding of green areas. (4) High rise. The net acreage for calculating density may be increased by one hundred (100) square feet for each dwell - ing unit above three (3) stories. In order to qualify for this credit, all floors must have elevator service. If this credit, when combined with others available in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this section, results in a reduction of yard or parking space area below that otherwise required by reason ,of the dimensions and number of dwelling units in the structure, then this credit shall not be allowed. (Ord. No. 245, § 10 (§ 906.090), 10 -3 -68; Ord. No. 559, § 1, 12- 12 -83) Sec. 36 -115. Same -- Certificate of occupancy$ Before any new multiple dwelling building in the city may be occupied by tenants, the owner or contractor shall first obtain from the building inspector a certificate of occupancy, and such docu- ment shall certify that all requirements, specifications, special treat- ments, screening, landscaping or any other prerequisite ordered or required by the planning commission or the council have been fully provided or complied with and that all work is complete. Any unau- thorized deviation or omission from city approved plans shall pre- Supp. No. 2 2226 ZONING 136-119 vent the issuance of such certificate and thereby prevent the occu- pancy of the structure by any tenants or residents. (Ord. No. 245, § 11(§ 906.100),10 -3 -68) See., 56 -116. Same— Sanitary sewer required; water connections. No multiple dwelling shall be built in the city, unless a sanitary sewer is available. The determination of availability shall be made b y the city engineer pursuant to demand requirements available or capable of being made available. All apartments shall be connected to municipal water when available. (Ord. No. 245, § 12 Q 906.110), 10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -117. Radio tower, antenna and flagpole setbacks. In all multifamily residential districts, citizen band radio towers, amateur radio towers, television antennas and flagpoles shall main- tain a five -foot setback from all property lines. (Ord. No. 392, § 2 Q 906.120(a)),1- 15 -76) Sec. 36 -118. R -SA multiple dwellings — Generally. All multiple dwellings in the city having three (3) to seventeen (17) units are designated as R -3A multiple dwellings and are re- quired to conform to the provisions of sections 36 -118 to 36-120 of this division. (Ord. No. 245, § 13 (§ 906.200),10 -3 -68) Sec. 86 -119. Same— Density and area requirements. a) Density. Except as otherwise modified or specified by terms of this chapter, or because of variances properly considered and allowed, the building site for any R -3A multiple dwelling shall con - sist of an area of at least fifteen thousand, six hundred twenty -five (15,625) square feet. The density shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and people per unit designated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan. (b) Floor area The minimum habitable floor area for each R -3A multiple dwelling shall be at least: five hundred eighty (580) square feet per efficiency or one - bedroom unit; seven hun- dred forty (740) square feet per two - bedroom unit; eight hundred Sapp. No. 2 2227 3 36.119 MAPLEWOOD CODE sixty (860) square feet per three- bedroom unit; one thousand forty (1,040) square feet per four - bedroom unit. (c) Green area. At least thirty -rive (35) percent of the R-3A multiple dwelling site shall be retained for and devoted to green area; except that, adjustment may be allowed under certain circum- stances in connection with the administration and application of section 36 -114 of this division., (d) Percentage for structure. The area covered by the R -3A build- ing shall not exceed thirty -five (35) percent of the site area. (e) Front yard requirements. Each R -3A multiple dwelling shall have a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet in depth facing any road or street. This setback shall apply to yards fronting on both streets where the building is located on a corner lot. (f) Side and rear yard requirement& (1) The minimum side and rear yard setback requirements for - an R -3A multiple dwelling shall be twenty (20) feet. (2) Parking spaces, garages, carports, or like structures shall be set back no less than five (5) feet from a side or rear property line and no less than fifteen (15) feet from a public street right-of-way. O Setbacks increased The minimum front, side and rear y V �Ao setba for an R -3A multiple dwelling shall be increased of to to exceed sev ty -five (75) feet, by the most restrictive of a follow - ing requireme where the lot abuts a farm resi ce, residen- tial estate, single d ing, or double dwellin ping district: (1) Building height: Th building setbs`cks shall be increased two (2) feet for each on it. t exceeds twenty- five (25) feet in height. (2) Exterior wall area: Where an exterio faces residen- tially zoned property, the setback of the wall s in- creased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet *. or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. (h) Height regulation. No R -3A multiple dwelling shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed a height of thirty -six (36) feet from Supp. No. 2 2228 ORDINANCE NO. 633 AN ORDINANCE AlKENDING THE RBQUIR34ENIS FOR SETBACKS TO RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED LAND THE MAPLEkOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS Sec on 1 Subsection 36 -27 C a ) under landscaping and screening, is amended -. as f of ws : I not less than twenty (20) � (a) Ala f eeV' -fn width shall Gaped area of �.. be provi where: (1) A nonr . esiden 1 use abuts a re -de`n0'_t i all y -zoned property. zoned for single or double (2) A multiple duelling u property dwellings. 's sub tion shall not apply where the The require t s of this reside ty i side 'a 1 -zoned proper is be' used or is designated Hated on t it ' s land use plan for a nonresi tial use. y Section 2. Subsection 36 _ 119 (g), under the R -3 multiple district, is amended as follows: (g) Setbacks increasede front side and rear yard setbacks for an R -3A (1) The minimum multiple dwelling shall be ncreased, not to exceed seventy- . fi e ( 75 p g i v feet, by the most restrictive of the following ) requirement , s where the lot abuts a farm residence, residen- • single dwelling, or double dwelling zoning district teal estate, s g a. Building height: i ht: The building setbacks shall be increased two ( 2 ) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twent}•- five (25) feet in height. • - b. Exterior wall area: where an ext erior wall faces residentially zoned property, the setback of the wall shall be increased five . (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, f in excess of two thousand. (2,000) square feet. • which would encroach into a required setback may (2) A building addition • ' use permits if such encroachment would be be approved by conditional u p consistent with surrounding property setbacks and scree ned in a man - unit • Design Review Board. At least 80% Her acceptable to the Community g of the addition shall. be screened from abutting residential p ro P erty. subsection shall not apply where the resi- � (3) The requirements of this su designated on the City's d y entiall -zoned property is being used or is land use plan for a nonresidential use* the NC, neighborhood Section 3. Subsection 36 -130 (d), under commercial distrrct, g is amended as follows: -1- ZONING 36 -121 ,grade level measured from the front or street side of such building. (Ord:. No. 245, § 14 (§ 906.210),10 -3-68; Ord. No. 448, § 19 7- 20 -78; Ord. No- 529, § It 11-22-82; Ord. No. 551, § 2, 9- 12 -83) Sec. 36 -120. Same —Two or more structures on one site. Where two (2) or more R -3A multiple dwelling structures are to be erected on a single site, the following special requirements shall apply to such buildings thirty -six (36) feet in height or less: (a) No building shall be closer to another building than twice the vertical height of the tallest building up to a maximum of seventy -two (72) feet measured from grade. (Figure A below) (b) No building shall be closer to another building than thirty- six (36) feet measured from grade. Where both building ele- vations are windowless, this requirement may be reduced by one - third. (Figure B below) (c) No building shall be closer to another building than twenty (20) feet measured from grade. (Figure C below) I E C A (Ord. No. 245, § 15 (§ 906.211),10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -121. R -3B multiple dwellings — Generally. All multiple dwellings in the city having more than seventeen (17) units within one structure are designated as R -3B multiple dwellings and are required to conform to the provisions of sections 36 -121 to 36 -123 of this division. (Ord. No. 245, § 16 ( § 906.300), 10 -3 -68) Supp. No. 2 2229 136 -122 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 36 -122. Same —Density and area requirements. (a) Density. Except as otherwise modified or specified by terms of this chapter, or because of variances properly considered and allowed, the building site for any R -3B multiple dwelling shall con - t of at ,least fifteen thousand, six hundred twenty-five (15,625) squaw feet. The density shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and people per unit desig- nated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan. (b) Minimum habitable floor area The minimum floor area for each R -3B multiple dwelling shall be at least: five hundred eighty (580) square feet per efficiency or one - bedroom unit;- seven hun- dred forty (740) square feet per two - bedroom unit; eight hundred sixty (860) square feet per three - bedroom unit; one thousand forty (1,040) square feet per four- bedroom unit. (c) Minimum land area. The minimum land area for any R -3B multiple dwelling shall have at least one acre and the building lot shall have a width of not less than one hundred fifty (150) feet. (d) Green area. At least thirty -five (35) percent of the site shall be retained for, and devoted to, green area; except that, adjustment may be allowed under certain circumstances in connection with the administration and application of section 36 -114 of this division. (e) Building ground area. Building area may not cover more than thirty -five (35) percent of the ground area. (f) Front yard requirements. The minimum front yard setback for an R -3B multiple dwelling shall be thirty (30) feet. This min- imum setback shall be increased according to the provisions of subsection 36- 119(g). This setback shall not be required to be greater than seventy -five (75) feet. (g) Side and rear yard requirements. (1) The minimum side and rear yard setbacks for an R -3B multiple dwelling shall be twenty (20) feet, unless the lot abuts a farm residence, residential estate, single- dwelling or double - dwelling zoning district, in such case, the mini- mum setback shall be increased according to the provi- sions of subsection 36- 119(8). Supp. No. 2 2230 ZONING 136-123 (2) Regardless of building height or external wall area, the side and rear yard setbacks shall not be required to be greater than seventy -five (75) feet. (3) As provided in subsection 36- 119(f)(2). (h) Height regukutiom No R -3B multiple dwelling shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed a height of three (3) stories, or thirty -five (35) feet, whichever 'is greater, measured from the front or street side of such building, unless granted a special use permit by the city council. (Ord. No. 245, § 17 (§ 906.310, 10 -3 -68; Ord. No. 448, § 11 7- 20 -78; Ord. No. 529, § 29 11- 22 -82; Ord. No. 551, § 39 9- 12 -83) Sec. 36 -123. Same —Two or more structures on*o.ie Bite. Where two (2) or more R -3B multiple dwelling structures are to be erected on a single site, the following special requirements shall apply to such buildings exceeding thirty -six (36) feet in height: (a) No building shall be closer to another building than twice the vertical height of the tallest building up to a maximum of one hundred (100) feet measured from grade. (Figure A below) (b) No building shall be closer to another building than thirty - six (36) feet, which distance shall increase by one foot for each two (2) feet of height in excess of thirty -six (36) feet, up to a maximum distance of seventy -five (75) feet of separa- tion measured from grade. Where both building elevations are windowless, thi% requirement may be reduced by one - third. Example: 44' high buildings, B = 40' of separation. (Fig- ure B below) (c) No building shall be closer to another building than twenty (20) feet, which distance shall increase by one foot for each four (4) feet of height in excess of thirty -six (36) feet, up to a maximum distance of forty (40) feet of separation measured from grade. Example: 44' high buildings, C = 22' of separa- tion. (Figure C below) Supp. No. 2 2231 136-123 MAPLEWOOD CODE re A[ • (Ord. No. 245, § 18 (§ 906.311),10 -3 -68) Sec. 36 -124. R -3C townhouses— Generally. For the purposes of this section, townhouses are defined as mul- tiple dwelling structures consisting of at least three (3) attached dwelling units, with no one unit or major portion thereof directly above or below any other unit. Such units are commonly described as row houses, patio homes or quads and are required to conform to the provisions of this section: (1) Height regulation. Height regulations set forth in section 36- 119(h) of this division apply to all townhouses constructed in the city, unless varied by spec:., l use permit. (2) Area and fire requirements; No townhouse structure shall be constructed in the city on an area of land less than four thousand (4,000) square feet per dwelling unit. no more than eight (8) dwelling units shall be included in a single struc- ture, with separation of each unit by at least a one -hour fire rated material and with every second dividing wall being constructed of at least a two -hour fire rated material that extends two (2) feet above the roof and two (2) feet out from the front and back walls. The density shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and people per unit designated in the city's adopted com- prehensive plan. 8upp. No. 2 2232 ZONING 136-125 3 Floor '� m le Hoar area for each mul- t) tiple ah l be at least:. fiw hun&vd e*hty ON sgwre feet Pe r efficiency or oim- bedroom unit; seven hundred forty (740) square feet per two-bedroom wait; eight hundred sixty 860) square feet per three- m unit; nine hundred forty (940) square feet per four - bedroom unit. 4 Common use area. Where more than one principal use struc- ture is constructed on the some or contiguous lots, yard areas planned for common use by occupants of all dwelling units may be counted in computing required lot space per unit for townhouses. (5) Front yard requirements. Similar to section 36-119(e) of this division, except that these shall refer to the total site devel- opment requirements and each dwelling unit may be up to its P articular property line with a garage, or carport abutting a private, not public, road. (6) Side yard requirement& a. As applied to the total development site, the side yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet in width. b. Where two (2) or more buildings or eight units occur Z on one lot, the side yards between buildings shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet. () ear y 7 R and requirement& As applied to the total develop- ment site, the rear yard shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width. (Ord. No. 245, § 19 (§ 906.400),10.3 -68; Ord. No. 448, § 1, 7- 20 -78; Ord. No. 465, § 1, 4.19 -79; Ord. No. 529, 0 3,11.22 -82L Ord. No. 551, 149 9- 12-83) Sec. 36 -125. Same —As part of planned unit development. Townhouses, together with other types of multiple dwelling structures, or any combination of different types of dwelling struc- tures defined and classified under this division, shall be eligible to be considered and treated as a planned unit development pur- suant to the P rovisions of article V of this chapter. (Ord. No. 245, .120 (§ 906.410), 10 -3-68; Ord. No. 559, § 2,12 - 12-83) Supp. Na 3 2233 136-126 MAPLEWOOD CODE DIVISION 5.5'. NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL D KICT Sec. $6126. Intent. The intent of this district is to preserve land for the use of businesses that are compatible with adjacent residential land uses. Uses are limited to offices and smaller retail uses that cater to convenience shopping. Pedestrian. and bicycle access are to be emphasized. (Ord. No. 539, 11, 4- 11-83) Sec. 36 -127. ' Permitted uses. Any of the following uses, provided that the floor area of all buildings in any one NC zone shall not exceed three thousand (3,004) wpm feet: (1) Bakery or candy shop for the production of goods sold on the premises. (2) Beauty parlor or barbershop. (3) Dry cleaner or laundromat. All odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residents. (4) Office or medical and dental clinics. (5) Repair shop, except for motorized vehicles. No work shall be performed outside of the building. (6) Drug, hardware or grocery store. (7) Studio. (8) Tailor or dressmaker shop. (9) Veterinary or grooming clinic where there are no outside kennels or storage. (lo) Video tape rentals. (11) Printing shop. (Ord. No. 539, § 19 4- 11-83; Ord. No. 582, § 1, 3- 11-85) Sec. 56128. Accessory uses. (Accessory uses within an NC Neighborhood Commercial Dis- trict are as follows: 8upp. No. 3 2234 SURVEY FOR R-3 REPORT Developed Undeve1oped Location Zone� Plan Laroenteur & Jackson R-3 RH 0 1.6 - - Larpenteur & Agate R-3 RH A.4 0 4-plex Adolphus St. R-3 RH 3.6 0 Maple Manor Larpenteur & R-3 RH 3,2 0 Larpenteur East McMenemy Ct. Road B and R-3 RM~OS 2~7 0 Mississippi Mississippi Apartments Edgerton & Roselawn R-3 RH 2"0 0 Maple Manor Care Center Skillman &Arkwright R-3 RM 7.3 0 Tarry Town ki1lman & Edgerton R-3 RH 12.0 0 Edgerton Highland Skillman & Edgerton R-3 RH .3.8 0 Edgerton Manor Roselawn & Arcade R-3 RH 089 0 - - Rcselawn & McMenemy R-3 RM 5.8 0 Maple Valley McMenemy South of Bellwood F RM 0 5.3 - - HcMenemy North of Larpenteur F RM 0 4.6 - - Larpenteur & Parkway R-3 RH 6.0 0 Bennington Woods Parkway Drive R-3 RH 0 20.9 Golf Course Cty. Rd. C & Hwy.61 M-~1 RM 0 10± - - Cty" Rd. D & Carey Heights Drive F RM 0 218+ - - Cty.Rd.D & Hazelwood F DC 0 80.2 - - Woudlynn & McKnight R-3 RM 2.9 4.8 Woodlynn Heights Townhomes Cty.Rd.D & Ariel F-PUD RM 0 31.3 Cty.Rd.D & McKnight F RM 0 5,9 - - Lydia and Arisl F_PUD RH Radatz & White Bear R-3 . RM Radatz & White Bear R-3 RM Radatz & White Bear R-3 RM Cty.Rd.Dv West of R-3 RH Southlawn 3.0 - - County Rd. D & Bradford Rider & Somth1 ewn R-3 RH Radatz & Southlawn R-3C RM .Mesabi F-PUD RL Eleventh & Ariel F RH Cope & At1antic R-3 RH Cope & Germain R-3C RM Sherren & White Bear R-3 RH Cope & Van Dyke R-1 RH Co.Rd .B & Van Dyke R-3 RM Co .Rd .B & Hazelwood R-3 RH ~ Co.Rd.B & Hwy-61 R-1 RM CO.Rd ,B & English Rl -PUD RM Northern Pacific & State Trail R-3 RH Frost & Clarence R-2 RM Frost & Walter R-1 RM Skillman & Clarence R-2 RM Skillman & English R-2 RM Frost & Birmingham R-3 RM Larpenteur & Clarence R-1 RM x 4.1 0.4 4.1 0 5.1 0 0 10.9 0 2.0 1.e 1.8 0 0 4.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 () .5 0 4.7 0 0 0 0.8 14.1 2.0 Cottages of Map lewood Concordia Arms 3-|1ex Lake Ridge Park Maple Ridge 1.7 Brandt Project 0 Maple Knoll 6.1 - - 0 Maplewood Manor 1.8(pond) Maple Park Shore 0 Maplewood Senior Care 2.0 - -- 3.0 - - 0 Bradford Rider & Adel Apts. 2.4 - - � 2.2 - - 0.9 - - 2.3 - - 2.8 - - 3.8 0 Apt garden type Frost & English R-3 RM 0 B . 5 Beebe Frost & Frank- FAH F -2 FM 0 10.4 L.. arp en t eur & Century F-~3 (includes 3.2 acre pond i ng easement) RM Fr isb i e & English R--3 EH 1 .0 0 English manor East Share Drive R-3 FAH 3.4 0 Park: v i ew Ct Larpenteur & Century R -3 FAH 0 9s5+ Hill-Murray H.S. Lwarpenteur & F --PUEr phi , OS 36,2 31w6 Townhouses of McKnight R -3 RM 0 30.1 - of Maplewood & R-3 RM 888 0 -� - Maryland W . of Lakewood Maple Woods Estates Lwarpenteur & Beebe R-3 RM 2.7 0 Southw i nds of Maplewood I Beebe Road F , R -3 RM 0 15.7 Southw i nds of Maplewood II Holloway & Beebe F -PUD RM 12.1 0 Archer Heights of Forest Green Holloway & Furness. R-3 RM Holloway & Beebe R-3 FAH Larpenteur & Beebe F RM L.. arp en t eur & Century F-~3 FM Larp en t eur a, St er l i n g R--1 , F RM Montana & Currie R -1 , PUD RM 0 . wr. 4.7 0 4a2 rw rww `wj a.w ww• 4.0 0 20 .4 w w err 11w ww+ mow.' . 5 2n5 0 Acorn Greenhouses Condom in i umS McKnight & Chicago R-3 FPM 0 64.6 - -. N.W. Railroad (Beaver Creek-) Ivy & Ferndale R -3 RM , QS 11v3 0 Pondv i ew Apts . Ivy & Ferndale R-1 RM 3 . S 0 Quad homes Hawthorne & Century R-3 FAH 3.6 0 Oakwood manor Maryland & Ferndale F -PUD FPM 3 . b 15.9 Beaver Creel:: Carriage Homes Maryland & Lakewood R -3 RM 0 30.1 - Maryland & Lakewood R-3 RM 888 0 -� - Maryland W . of Lakewood R -2 RM 0 13.7 _ -ww Stillwater & Ferndale R-3 RB Stillwater Ave. & Stillwater Road R-3 RH Maryland & Century R'1 RM Stillwater Ave. & 1.0 Century East McKnight R-3 RH 7th & Stillwater Rd. R-3 RH Still water Rd X, 7th R'1 RH Minnehaha & Century R-3 RH Y1ionehaha & Century R-1 RH Stillwater Rd & Bush R-1 RH Minnehaha & Carlton R-3 RH Minnehaha & Carlton R-1 RH Conway & Ferndale R-3 RH Brookview & Century R'3 RH Lower Afton & F-PUD, RM %]orland Road 13.5 - - Londin Lane & F-PUD RM Crestview () McKnight T .Houses Pond & McKnight R-3 RM l_ondin Lane & F-PUD RH Elorl and Road loss Crestview Forest Mailand & Crestview F-PUD R-1 Forest 0 Linwood Hts " & Hi1l*ood & Durland F-PUD RL 0"3 0 Apt., garden type 11 0 Silver Ridge 1.3 1.0 Century East 0 2.2 McKnight 0 2a4 0 2s4 - - 0.7 0 Aot.,garden type 0 6s6 - - 0 2.7 - - 0 4.6 - - 0 10.9 2, 0 () - - 6.1 0 Brookview Manor & Century Ridge 0 13.5 - - 906 0 Connemara Aots . 4n7 () McKnight T .Houses 21~2 C Maolehi1ls Townhouses I & II 29 �2 loss Crestview Forest Townhouse 1 .5 0 Linwood Hts " & Adrienne's Add ' n . Action bar Cotxnci�'4 .� Endorsed - Mo d i i' i Rej .i Dat a,,;, May 4, 1989 To: Gail Blackstone Staff Services Coordinator City of Maplewood From: Pat Williamson, Chair a rso p n Human Relations Commission This is to inform you that the Human Re • Relations Commission is recommending the appointment of Dawn G. Vassar to following fill the existing vacancy, owing our meeting with four applicants during our regular meeting held May 2 l Y 989. Dawn and I should be able'to attend the M • at 7:40 May 22 council meeting p • m. i f the recommendation is presented at that time, We were extremely pleased with the concern for human rights which was expressed by the applicants, and in accordance with our we will ask the other applicants Bylaws' p to serve as citizen members of working n committees. g Looking forward to hearing from you soon. cc: Commission members MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: Staff Services Coordinator RE: Human Relations Commission Annual Report DATE: May 15, 1989 4latl Qn by Couna e Endorsed_-____ Red ecte ...- Date. INTRODUCTION Attached is the Human Relations ns Commission 1988 Annual Report for our, information and review. Pat Williamson Ch y � air will be present at the May 22nd Council Meeting to answer any questions. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the 1988 Human ations Commission Annual Report. GJB:1 nb T 0 z FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Ken Robertsq Associate Plann . e• conditional Use Permit Termination 1564 En Grandview Avenue David Suby Tool Sharpening Home Occupation May 55 1989 SUMMARY iv- � 0 Action by Counoilo Endorsed Modified---.---.. dejected. Date. The applicant has discontinued the operation a+ his tool sharpening service in his home. The conditional use permit shouldq therefore, be terminated, BACKGROUND On May 23, 1983, the City Council approved the CUP subject to the applicant obtaining a license each January. On May 14, 1984, the City Council granted a five year renewal for the CUP. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 36-442 (f): The council may, upon reviews terminate the permit if the approved conditions may have been violated or the use is no longer in effect. Section 36-442(g): In the event the council in its review process decides to consider imposing additional conditions or termination of a conditional use permit, the City Council shall hold at least one public hearing on that permit after a notice of the hearing has been published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days before said hearing, RECOMMENDATION Termination of the conditional use permit for tool sharpening home occupation at 1564 E. Grandview Avenue, since the business is no longer in operation, krsuby-cup Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map / -- owop eke � W .......... O N �' ^^ --^- KOHLMAN AVE. KOHLMAN I AvE. cr y Z ..� COUNTY ROAD „c„ Y a n23 > 2 fY - } r.VE 0 z EDGEHILL RD. / Q < < + Z = 6S tj a DEMONT u. AVE. W o ; �'" ♦ RK AVE._ O = — to ; W. ' , t 4. �v ic W AV 11 th AVE. Q �Q o TA USE x GERVAIS AV E. �. ---_J GERVAI RvQi AVE. G A DVIEw EA AVE. AS71E AV C -- C SHERREN AVE - --_�C= OpE .. nAE.N AVE - -- 0 AVE. LARK AvE y LARK AVE. ~ LARK t~n 25 � _ H AVE._` _ � R LE _ l x Z ac [LELAND< 0 25 = T i z o �., W � O ®� z AVE � 65 N < ..1 z ' O 2 Q JUM TI N AVE 8., tt Y 6� ; _ U RKE � AVE. � � 8U KE ELDRIDG AVE b ___Ji Qom, 4 00 PUBLIC WORKS AN � ISELMON T z AVE . W > BLDG. VE u SKILLMA N ea AVE = MAR RIS N vE ~ A J W `• _ Q Ros [[wood AVE. O RYAN L... .J L RJ UAN h RFC fic, 0VA P �. 28 FR0 ST ' cz.� a~i AVE h ♦' si ~ ►� F`''� R h 28 IL 7 bJ F. NtT.ON AVE. Q H IR W 4 t at N SV R J t~- . Q62 ` 3 O W 0' ` FFRIS81E AVE. cr m 5 3 RIPLEY AV . 1 Q Wokefie /d 1 LO/f'Q O? !0 PH IA 4�E o z z W h Lok a i= z 29 N' AVE z SOP a� E „� Pho /en < z - �� o z z 3 = J PRICE =AVE z PRI E AV `� GJ Y J N 62 O i - L A P N T �:::::�.:+� A V oe: ..... -.30 F- %, 65 LOCATION MAP ATTACHMENT I 4 N � \ --`^ ']-' --1 { / � ~ I � ' r, ' | | --f F- m ~^ / G, R ' i � 56 2 - Ilk ' � 557 1565JJ57 1583 n59 \ - ' ----- | ----------T- ----' ' ( ' | | '^ PROPERTY LINE MAP AL ATTACHMENT 2 MEMO To: Michael McGuire, City Manager From: Patrick J. Kelly, Bannigan & Kelly, P.A. Date: May 2, 1989 N— a Action by Council Endorsed,._. Modifi ed.,............. Re: Southwinds A mtments . Conditional Use Permit for a P Ur j eeted P Development and Prelim ' Plat Approval Dat P u�3' �P On April 24, I987, Council Person Anderson moved and seconded by Council Person Rossbach the following Motion: I move that the Conditional Use Permit for amulti- family PUD in a zoning district located Easterly of Beebe. Road and Northerly of Larpenteur Avenue which facility is proposed to accommodate 120 apartment units and is described as follows: Lot 1, Block 2, Southwinds of Maplewood Second Addition. On the basis of the following findings of fact: 1) The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of .the chapter. 2) The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3) The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district and the neighborhood in general. 4) The use would not depreciate property values in that it provides for an ample buffer of open space and vegetation where it interfaces with single - family residential areas to the east. 5) The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6) The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7) The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks and will not inordinately burden public facilities and services. e. sj The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost Y for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. .r9 C i . The use would reserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic 9) P � features into the development design. 10) The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following �nditions: 1) Adherence to the site plan, dated March 27, 1989, and the conditions approved by the Community Design Review Board. 2) All uses shall conform with the R -3 zoning district requirements. 3) Noise levels shall not exceed PCA standards at any residential property line. 4) No outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. 5) Removal of the proposed roadway connection from Green Gate to Beebe Road through the subject property. 6) The trees along the north and east property lines shall remain undisturbed. 7) An eight- foot -wide asphalt walkway for public use shall be constructed from Furness Street to Beebe Road. The existing easement may be altered to allow for curves in the path if approved by Williams Brothers Pipeline. 8) This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of approval, based ont he procedures in City code. 9) An eight - foot -wade sidewalk should be constructed adjacent to Beebe Road and shall be �rnstalled by developer and maintained in winter and summer months. MOTION FAILED 3 TO 2. Suggested findings for denial: 1) The use would be hazardous and detrimental to the present and potential surrounding land uses due to excessive water run -off and flooding presently existing on surrounding properties. 2 A 2) The intensified use of an additional school children would be inordinately burdensome on the public facilities and services such as schools. The subject site consist of 12.9 acres and the utilization of and the PUD use consist of 120 apartment units including 48 one bedroom, 60 two bedroom, and 12 three bedroom units. Said intense use would create more than a minimal adverse environmental effect on the subject property by displacing wildlife including but not limited to, birds, pheasants, raccoons, and other protected species. 3) The proposed walking path would depreciate property values in the adjacent single- family residential areas to the east and said walking paths would be hazardous, detrimental and disturbing to the surrounding land uses due to increased traffic, increased accessibility to ponds and unauthorized use of ponds by third parties. 4) The increased use of the traffic path considered as alternative three would create additional requirements at public costs for monitoring and patrolling such . paths. PJK 3 KK Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. 300 First Avtnue North Nlinneapolis, MN, » -101 612 3 39 - -i 2+ )c i FAX 3-42-926- May 10, 1989 Mr. Geoff Olson City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 SUBJECT: Cook Housing Maplewood, Minnesota Comm. Ho. 89 -01- 6005 -01 Dear Geoff: Attached to this letter, you will find copies of the trail options which are diagramed on the site plan for the Southwi nds Apartments project. As you know, there are four options , and we have the following comments regarding each: OPTION A: This trail would actually consist of three parts. The first will be the required bituminous trail which is 8' wide and runs along the north edge of the site from Furness and Ripley over to Beebe Road. The second por- tion of this trail will be the concrete sidewalk in the right -of -way for .Beebe Road along he frontage of the apartment site. The third portion will g - hw i nd Apartments down to s be to extend this concrete sidewalk . from the Sout Lar p enteur Road. All portions of this trail would be designed to curve back and forth and to ri se and fal l to gi ve it a true trai 1 1 i ke feel . The sl ope f the ram portions of the trail will be designed to accommodate handicap ° p P existing trees along requirements. This weaving design would allow us to g 9 the north edge of the site and to create a more interesting pathway. Trail 4p on s ti A i preferred by the developer and is, hereby, submitted as part of the P, U.D, application as the proposed trai 1 way. TRAIL OPTION B would consist of an 8' wide bituminous walkway from the east/ west trail on the north edge of the site into and through the apartment site 0 9 n a sidewalk and again connecting to a bituminous walkway at the south edge of the p aved area continuing down to La rpenteu r Road* This trail has two serious drawbacks: 1 It would infringe upon the privacy of the apartment occupants. Since the buildings are close together, the trail , by necessity, will run within 40' of bedroom windows and sliding patio doors. Arc 1iitertLirc Planning Interim Dcsign Mr. Geoff Olson May 10 , 1989 Page Two Comm. No. 89 -01- 5005 -01 20 Legal liability: This trail crosses a vehicular ath at two P loca- tions. We consider these to be too dangerous to consider for walkway of this type which will be used both b y adults and small children. a TRAIL OPTION C is similar in nature to O t i h p on 6 .except that � t would extend through the driving ng 1 ane of the parking area for the apartment rtment site the same drawbacks as p It has Option on B except that the potential of serious accident . s is much greater. TRAIL OPTION D is located over the abandoned trolley car track line,, ne in this area has been b The soil ermed up and appears to be solid and in some cases, the rails from the trolley line are still visible. This trail would consist t of an 8' wide bituminous walkway extending from the corner of Furness and Ripley down along the east edge of the site to Larpenteur Road. It has two rob p 1 ems • 1. It would spoil an otherwise virgin natural area. This low-lying area contains quite wooded q a variety of wild d 1 i fe and plantings, Through all the years of development in the City of Maplewood, it has not been spoiled,, The installation of a trail will, , of course, bring with i t noise, , tras h and the potential of vandalism, which all will have a negative ve im act o the apartment tenants, g P n 29 This trail would be located near the back sides des of the adjacent houses to the east. At the last City Council meeting, which we attended several neighbors were also i � • • v ral .9 n attendance and unanimously vol ced opposition to this trail based on spoiling of a natural environment loss of ri va cy and fear of potential vandalism. p Geoff, these are the four options that have been reviewed to date It is our opinion that Option A is the preferred alternative. If ou have an s y y que tons, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. ichard J. Haluptzok, AI skt Attachment cc: Chuck Cook ZONNG FUD ( PU"O) LMT DEVFLOPM9 ) WE AREA 561.IM4 SQFT, s ' • - 12899 ACRES APARTIvENr UVT OOUNr aLaa Tm A OW mat TWO aOMat THFtM e1 io 24 es t c � � s ao 0 i TOTAL,= as �o u - TOTAL NQ OF APT. DIY's 120 s Na OF i"TS PER ACRE' 9m PARKM REOCA REMF?.TS RRMRED 2 PER APT, L T PROVIDED 120 GOVT 126 OPEN 41+ COMC . •AL K ,p• fYAAD 246 WTSA(X - TOTAL _ 1a• - ' 1XTsAoc i'PM COMMUNE B E E B E R O A O. arrf acre rip �., oasTSru oAS Lr,E W - • • T1!P� Q EX13TM1a FARM me UO 1 t • ' ' O , • T1� iEJMtYAfD : -� - - �� MECYARD XTSACKS s -. - - _ • LSO`- 4' _ - 750 ' ��` s�•► � .... ,�. -- wig � ` .. film `� _ I �` ,......�. - ......... omob, •� �► ..r � ••- '"'"' _ a' sr:isr+«�Q Wei SAM ago 1 . i w 4! ! so dmw *�zs; •'`� FURNESS • STREET Lu EXISTING MOUSE ..1¢ MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development and Prel imminary Plat Approval LOCATION: Beebe Road, North of Larpenteur Avenue APPLICANT: Continental Development Corporation, Coon Rapids, MN PROJECT TITLE: Southwinds Apartments DATE: May 15, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Reguest The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a 120-unit multi-family planned unit development (PUD) and seven-lot preliminary plat. They are also requesting that the City delete the requirement for the private road to Beebe Road that runs through this property from the Green Gate apartments. Description of the Project The PUD consists of 120 apartment units, including 48 one- bedroom, 60 two-bedroom, and 12 three-bedroom units. A total of seven three-story buildings are proposed on a 12.9 acre site located east of Beebe Road and northerly of Larpenteur Avenue. A total of 246 parking spaces will be provided with 120 of those being covered. The covered parking will occur in the form of tuck-under garages within each principal building. The proponents propose to subdivide the property into aseparate lot for each building so that each lot can be developed and sold as a separate entity. Reason for the Reques, A portion of the property apartments. The easterly residence, which does not with a conditional use pe/ development to a specific require City approval, CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL is already correctly zoned R-3 for portion of the site is zoned F, farm permit multi-family development except ~mit for a PUD. A CUP would limit plan. Any changes to the plan would Section 36-442 (b) of the City code requires that approval of a CUP shall be based upon ten findings. (Refer to the findings in the resolution on page 32.) Section 30-81 minimum subdivision design standards, are th criteria against which subdivisions are evaluated, the DISCUSSION The apartment complex is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Most of the natural vegetation on the east and north id of the site �vill be preserved to buffer the home s t th s es Thw* advantage of �� conditional use permit for a r UDo ovee e�st^ rezoning is that the developer is tied t r a o � specific p1an. The main issue. seems to be, pedestrian or vehicular f Furness Street and Ripley Avenue across this site access from on-going debate in the early 1970s over the purpose There was an the private road easement connecting the Green G �� mr need for parking lot to Beebe Road. (Refer to "Past Action" apartment page 6") This road is not needed for vehicles. c on" section on this road would allow westbound t.affif Constructing Gate apartments t� avoid F traffic from the 108-unit Green would allow Furness Street and Ripley Avenue but � �w ��astbO�md traffic from the 120-unit Southwi dv apartments to =cut through" the neighborhood to McKnight n s The Fred Moore PUD should be revised t�m omit this �oad" especially now, since Holloway Avenue is planned for construction. ^�r This leaves the question of pedestrian access Staff is recommending construction of - -- ^ between on an eight-foot-wide paved trail ��ween Ripley Avenue and Beebe Road to provide access to th school property from the neighborhood This would l e place f� the seniors in Archer Heights tn walk This provide a identified in the HRA'ss 1976 Survey o� tenants. " Thn s nee� was also proposing a concrete sidewalk rB� nw» " e developer is is needed i � on e��b*� Road" This sidewalk school , since children on this street will have to walk to oo once Holloway Avenue is constructed The This sidewalk should be extended al L ° y are now bussed" developer-'s east property line This Avenue to the safety along Larpenteur A " ^� // z�Prov�� pedestrian store and to a planned St«enuev provide access to the corner land for a trail that d" Paul trail" The City �»f St" Paul owns ends at Larpenteur Avenue The trail i cc�nstructed about 3 1/2 blocks south of Larpe t" A ra s Paul would consider extending the trail t L n eur venue, St, Maplewood continued --' o �rPenteur Avenue if , it. RECOMMENDAT ON 1" Approve the resolution on page 32 which approves e CUP f PUD for the Southwinds apartments Approval is r or a ��n the basis that the project " �' recommended CUP" (Refer to the resolution the ten findings for a findings.) on on page 26 for specific Approval is subject to the following conditions: a. Adherence to the site plan dated 3-27-89 and the 2 conditions approved by the Community Design Review Board. b. Al uses shall conform with the R-3 zoning district requirements. c. Noise levels shall not exceed PCA standards at any property ' �/ ]i�e �� . d. No outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. e. Removal of the proposed roadway connection from Green Gate to Beebe Road through the subject property. f. The trees along the north and east property lines shall remain undisturbed. g. An eight-foot-wide asphalt walkway for public use shall be constructed from Furness Street to Beebe Road. The existing easement may be altered to allow for curves in the path if approved by Williams Brothers Pipeline. An eight-foot-wide asphalt walkway shall be constructed from the east-west path d6 scribed above to the parking lot. h. A five-foot-wide concrete sidewalk shall be constructed along Beebe Road from the north property line to Larpenteur Avenue and along Larpenteur Avenue from Beebe Road to the east property line. i. This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of approva1, based on the procedures in City code. 2a Approve the resolution on page 35 which amends the Fred Moore CUP/PUD by eliminating the south roadway access to Beebe Road. 3~ Approve the preliminary plat for Southwinds apartments, subject to the following conditions being satisfied prior to final plat approval: an Elimination of the original south roadway connection to Beebe Road. b. . The provision and recording of cross easements running to all lots to allow for the sale of individual lots. CO Compliance with all requirements of the Cit. Engineering Department regarding sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer services. KI d ^ Final grading, util ity, drainage, erosion control and street plans must be approved by the City Engineer. e. Submittal o+ ,a signed developers agreement with required surety for all required public streets, uti1ities, erosion control , walkways and tree planting. ' f. Drainage easements, as required by the City Engineer, shall be shown on the-southeast end of the plat. 4. Authorize staff to request that the City of St. Paul extend 'their trail north to Larpenteur Avenue, 4 CITIZEN COMMENTS Neighborhood surveys were mailed to 33 property owners within 350 feet of the proposed development. Of the 10 returned, 3 were in favor, 4 were opposed and 3 had no comment. Those in favor made the following comments: ' I. I like the plan; it is not the ordinary square, flat-roofed buildings which is the norm, but distinct, different design, paved or garages. Also I like the fact that the developer is allowing more green space and not maximizing the people per acre. 2. It may lower my taxes, more people paying should lower taxes. 2^ Agree but natural vegetation should be required along the east and north edges of the development and a foot path should be extended from the corner of Ripley and rurness to Beebe Road. Those commenting in opposition to the project were as follows: 1" I object to this proposal because of high apartment vacancy rate and over saturation of apartment complexes. There should be a moratorium on the building of apartment buildings for at }east 24-36 months. (This comment is from the owner of Green Gate Apartments.) ' 2. I object to this proposal because I need more information as detailed on the back of this page. a) Who will live in the apartments? Elderly? Low-cost housing? Etc.? b) Will there be a vehicular access from this apartment complex to Furness or Ripley, including through existing apartment complexes? 3. We believe the property should not be developed for reasons of preserving the wildlife. 4. The PUD does not contain the road or walkway which were conditions imposed on this site by the PUD's granted on the northern half of the site. 5 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is vacant and has a total of 12.899 net acres with approximately 700 feet of frontage on . Beeb a Road. It has rather irregular. topography . Its highest elevation is found at the southwest corner near Beebe Road where it reaches an elevation of 11035-5. I t generally slopes from the center of the site to its periphery, with low areas correlating with poor soils conditions along the easterly edge of the property. There is evidence that unstable soil conditions may exist throughout the site. VEBETATICN Trees and brush are scattered throughout the subject property. Most of the vegetation is deciduous in nature though there are a relatively small number of large coniferous trees. Major trees are found ins the vicinity of proposed buildings 1 and 7. These arse large cottonwood trees, two of which are proposed to be preserved and incorporated with the future development, SURROUNDING LAND USES The Archer -.Heights and Green Cate apartment complexes are located northerly of the subject property. Green Gate was Phase I of the original Fred Moore development, while Archer Heights was Phase II of that P'UD . Lands westerly of the subject property across Beebe Road are 'vacant. Southwesterly of the site are located four f our -p l ex es . The property to the south is occupied by one house and a barn. Lands lying easterly of the subject property and southerly of Ripley Avenue are occupied by single-family homes and are separated from the FUD by the former Twin --City Lines railroad right-o+-way, which is proposed to remain open and Undisturbed according to the site plan. FAST ACTIONS: Private Road to Larpenteur Avenue 2-9-68: The City approved a PULE for apartments north of the subject site. No mention of a drive to Larpenteur Avenue was made, B-7-69: The City approved a revised PUD for the same property. One of the conditions was "that a road south to Larpenteur be constructed to handle construction traffic and provide another access." (Note: Eeebe Road had not been constructed yet.) 1-22-70: Council approved building plans for Phase I (the site of the current Green Gate apartments) . One of the conditions was „A service road for all construction traffic to Phase I will be required from Larpenteur Avenue north to the site." 5-11-70: A 22-f oot- -wide , non-exclusive, perpetual private right- L• of-way easement was approved, 2~ 1 -0 . City ~' The . 7 Y a pp roved a revised (s a, t� of the present Arche concept plan far Phase 2 Archer Heights ghts apartments ). The minutes reflect confusion with the purpose of the private road . ( See m. p a e 16 Conditions 2. b. and C. required that "All l construct lon traffic access from Larpente.r Avenue an t y" and "No occupancy to any portion of stage one until Street is improved from stage , a hard Surfaced t.age one parking areas to L.ar enteur Avenue." p 10-7-71: .The road was discussed again Purpose of the road gain with confusion as to the . The planner states it was for construction purposes only. (See minutes on page 20 ,} 10-8-710a A letter to tie l annex tie . p' from the contractor states that road was f Qr construct icon purposes and would be barric (See letter on page 23.) ceded, 10-21-71: Counc i t discussed the road closing end Stated that th road should be opened. The question of e road was ref erred t to s paving. and timing Of the taff to reach an agreement with the involved. (See minutes on p age 24 .3 people 7-20-72: The rand was again discussed* . The City At t carp ey stated that the purpose of the road is a matter interpretation. of Council Councilmen Wiegert and Creavu agreed permanent road to the south was that a a condition of Phase 1 devel opment: (See minutes on a e 26 p g .� B-23-72: A memo from the l annex p concludes that this read was for construction _ traffic only. (See memo on P age 28 . ) 5-22-86 : The City approved a rel i site C Southw i nc�s of p m i nary plat for. the subject Maplewood ewood 2nd Addition 3. One of the conditions stated that "The Two �h r i va ' Bloc p to driveway easement through all be shown on the final plat in its roved b present location or relocated as approved Y the -City This easement shall not be eliminated without approval b . and amendment of the conditional Y Council l of use permit for Fred Moore P l ann.ed unit development (Forest Green recorder, however, wog apartments)." The County would not allow a private i vat a easement t o b on the plat. e shorn PLANNING The property is designated for RN I residential medium density. The maximum population - density allowable is 22 people per net acre . The Project density i5 proposed to be 19.9 e acre . p op l e per net TRAFFIC AND ACCESS Access for the development will be to /from Beebe Road via two Proposed driveway entrances. Beebe Road is not a major street, but it connects directly to Larpenteur Avenue which is designated as a major arterial in the comprehensive plan, . In 1987, it carried 7,650 average daily trips (ADT) in the vicinity of Beebe Roade The project will generate approximately 6.1 ADT per unit (ITE Manual it Will, therefore, generate approximately 730 ADT with Op 85 of those trips being generated during the PuMn peak hour, The comprehens i ve p I an has tak en i nto account the traf f is that wi 1 1 be generated by the subject site. Immediate intersection improvements Wil I I not be required to accommodate this project, kd/swinds-mem Attachments 110 Hillside Plan 2a Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 40 App I i cant Is Memo 5• Building Elevation 60 Landscape Plan 7. 12-17-70 Minutes Be 10• 7-71 Minutes 98 10-8-71 Letter 10* 10-21-71 Minutes 11. 7-20-72 Minutes 12. Memo from Bailey Seida 13. Resolution - Southwinds Apartments PUEi 14. ResolUti on -- Fred Moore PUD 15. Plans (Separate Attachment) �66 • • jot 1 t t._.�, -� .� _ • ��,., sou r ALA ........... MP 'TTT . ... TE 11. . M ....... . • . . ��. F Sau._~ line ["�. ♦ ' NO JL M.- -T ♦ �.. 1 __ ___ _ .�� „��, .__ _ R�a�Or collector t'O RI =R I* Ak#1 rN 41L -i t, . C- major erteriai�" LSC. Hillside N EIGE143O :i @iCaD LAINID USE PLAiN Attachrent 1 9 4 N Ri R 03 G B 1817 y OCo O µ.. *w .... 84 ]1816 At U 2 0 8 c t43� 9 o tas 0 C4-2-i 101 (M) Q , .t R2o1 6 L q dt _ Do t .r is Cos %I?- . t 3 1.55o►G. ' R 3 - 221.P14 - 2 TITA 4 3.180c• 44 - - -- jz'Q Z.%S o3O W - - r - - �o Tot aC Z eQ • - J 0 3 TOTAL. lol- L •. ( Iuc (.i L . 41 Ale • ti 0 s + i3o/ 5 APUC tiTA I , a 6�aC 32 KAL ` O 4.t •� 6 3 , - 87ac•T•rAtL --� 1731 — 37. r .- 3.82 oc.. +'� E. Agy Ct? 3 . - j 0 V �� i�,� $� ae Q s .' 39 a O 75 "� c To*&( � o o. 1721 29 Q , V rt K _ = - J EsnT 1711 — 17 Q d 4fi o 'd owl .L <) C o •- ZQ1.9� r Za� _ -- --� ,dd3?L32 701 0 J e s rrt. t � O•G � 1e � 1.03 ac. oho tmwwwwr t2 t l 10 � , N• 5 8s � � o-to 213 5 (j) 88 (s8) s J t 2 2 9.87 ,�•.,r "`, *MW I a ce PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP • ; 0 Attachment 2 �, $y� �� i� ►1� � I I I I I I I I; i I a elm IM 40 Ci iiiiiiiiiij Co ED L *rely avow YAi1NsduvI 11 Attachment 3 korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, inc. C 300 First Avenue North Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 5540 612/339 -4200 M E M O R A N D U M PROJECT: Maplewood Apartments COMM, N0.: 89=01-6005-01 TO: File,, City of Maplewood DATE: January 27, 1989 Planning Coni ss ion FROM: Dick Nal u ptzok SUBJECT: P.U.D. Application for site at Beebe & Larpenteur Roads 1. The site, located on Beebe Road, north of Larpenteur Road, is 12,899 gross acres. Of this area, 1.9 acres is a contained easement for the. Williams Pipe Line Company along the north property line. 2. Continental Development Corporation has purchased the property to develop,, 120 apartment units on a major portion of the site, 39 Upon approval of this P.U.D. application, it is the intent of the developer to plat the property into seven sites each containing one apart- _ ment building with enclosed and adjacent on -site parking and including all necessary easements for access and utilities, 4. Disposal of sanitary 'waste will be accomplished by connection to the city system. 5. Construction and development of the housing facility will be staged and span a period of 12 -36 months with buildings being built in numerical order from 1 to 7 as indicated on the attached site plan. Construction will also be dependent on interest rates and market conditions, 6. Since the property is currently zoned both Farm and Multi-family and since the City's long range comprehensive plan calls for multi- family at this location, city staff has recommended this application be submitted as a Planned Unit Developments However, zoning requirements such as parking and building setbacks, parking counts and density per acre have been designed to be in compliance with the overriding R-3 Zoning. u 2 Attachment 4 7. The density allowed for this zoning district is 22 persons per acre. The site area is 12.899 acres which allows a total density of 283 persons. The actual density proposed is as follows: 48 one- bedroom units at 1.4 persons/unit = 67.2 60 two - bedroom units at 2.5 persons /unit = 150.0 12 three-bedroom units at 3.3 persons/unit = 39.6 TOTAL . . 256.8 Thus, the proposed density is within that allowed by ordinance. skt Attachment 13 uawn C+ C+ CD C7 C+ Ai N, �o . 1 •r�Wr, sin Asa ire . _ isS sus ...._ man I 300 %w he~ 4 iw Sm • .%#Mo o G& wo SSNi 612Mq- 42M MAPtEWOOD ppgpTMENT3 MAvterrcxia M++. ai�lA1101r SAL OEVEL CpXWKX;A I Omar Im~ mpwm�% ONO 0 400M aaoM wMOa ..........� ONO Row a L� -i C" Ct' Cf' n Ct / !i cares: • I OP M we M am* • aM w � �w� 0--t w: r • � asp �. xs�x.'"......�ss� - • lrF q lr..> r� rr • rr .iv w.rr w r war � w r 0 • v w...rw .+ w •. UM am Woo • %,I BEF B- ROAD 17 _ / I O uj 1- W r CL EXISTING fAtit,l cc Q / h 2 { i I � . 1 \� 3 �-- .. t , S` FUR ESS EFERT- - VEINS_ }W STRf ET s- URSERY - - f w W ww � f XISTING NOOSE I a � ( � I ruo I m to t Passed this 17th day of December, 1970 by the Council of the Village of Maplewood, Mayo Attest-.: Ay s - 5 Clerk a s y - o Seconded by Counci man Greavu. Ayes - a1I. • N 1,714 BUSINESS 1 Human Ri.gh. is Commission e Change Request, a Manager Miller rece • e ra request from the Human • Q - _ mission to change its .ar�ae t TI _ • Rights Coin Human Relations Commission• The Commission feels tha the sugg stied name is more reflective of duties. Ili a o request Ie Council reconsider the action taken regarding th l.ioose Locke L: uor License. . b. Councilman G eavu introduced th adoption: f n._TUx., 1i, n2d]?. r,Ce i ts (Firs t Rcadin 'lI1G Moved � -�' r Ordinance No, 2 c Amending Ordinance Relating t IIuman Rights Commission (Name Change) Second d by Councilman Wi eger t , A s all, C* ounc i lwoman Olson moved to suspend the rules and to reconsider th matter of the I`Ioose Lod e Lic Igo ._._ -- r Liccr�se at t:h .7'iIlll��r�' 7 19i I. me .__ e;coiided by Councilman Wil egert, Ayes -- y 11, H• UNFTNTSITT 1) BUSTNESS (Continued)- 2. Site Plan Forest Green (continued) a. Village Attorney Lais stated he had reviewed the August and the January, 1970 minutes e �,, 199 regarding approval of the Fred lIoore development. His interpretation would be that a r° ad�'l3' would be built for access to the site from the south but the wording, of t,ii, condition regarding the roadway is somewhat ambiguous _ -1' s and d 1 J CI matter of interpretation by the Council as to what heir intent was 16 Attachment 7 12/17/70 He further stated that this access was a condition of Phase I of the development. b Iiarve Kaplan, attorney for t1�e developer, stated it was his • S understanding; that the Council did not want Phase II traffic to have access to Furness Street. A legal concern had been brougli t up as to restricting access to rurness Street from Pliv s.e II and thereby land locking Phase II. To eliminate that problem, consideration was gi.ven to providing some measure of access from Phase II, prior to development of that area, dox,rn to 7�arpenteur Avenue. At that time, consideration had not been given to fir. Sci.da' s propos al for an over all traffic development but preliminary consideration was given to avoid the land locking problem and it was his inlpres -- sion and the developers 1* mpression, that the specific purpose for the road to Larpenteur was to provide for Phase II access aiid svoid the problem of having Phase II traffic congesting Furness Strect. Manager ger Miller stated the Planning Cojrnnissioli rc,eateu�elld s P1 �n C . 1 �,� • "alternate 7A" which includes the extension of Ripley t.hrou, ;il t12 e project and Bill High School property to North St-. Paul Road, 1I0110c -ray 1 Beebe e ho ad to Holloway. lower • to North St. Paul road and �3ee y 'J��c staff rc1.coln- mends the extension of Beebe to North St. Paul Road ��nd I1o11c�w��y to Beebe. It is felt that the opening; of 11'ipleY would clef ecat the t:Ouncil.' s limitation on access to Furness ano right -of� -way thru1.► :,11 Ifill IIi� ;1� School would present. assessment problems, 'fhe c�xten :- ion of 11ol.low:.�y P Beebe woulu again present assessrn�:nt problems � <<1 IIi11.. In .1 addition one -half of Beebe north of Ifolloway is no ��7 d�:dicated �it�ti o ld be the logical extension of the storm sewer systc-m. It is w u d suggested that the Council determine its choice of a street s�lst.erl and deter mine if the second phase of the Fore:�t Green (Fred 1.100r. 0 project fats the system. A.staff report was issued on Novai -lbor 16 P ro J relative to the ro j ect which recoll rend ed approval wi t11 conditions. P Council had requested comments from Ramsey County and Forth Saint Paul regarding the proposed traffic pattern, but nothing in kn'iting had bc.en received. d. Followin g further discussion, Councilman Wi egert moved niTro of the revised concept plan for Phase II with the s taif i s j cco�.<<nelz- Ci t1.OTzS 3�� amend ed 1. Divide Phase 2 into 2 development stages: (a) Designate Stage 1 as the 69 unit Southerly Portion; (b) Designate Stage 2 as the 123 Unit Northerly Portion; 2. Allow for Building Plan formulation and review to proceed for Stage 1 Portion subject to following conditions: ' (a) Council approval of detailed design plans for all neces� sary structures in Stage 1; .. 17 12/17 • (b) All construction traffic access from Larpenteur Avenue - only; (c) No occupancy to any portion of Stage 1 until a hard sur- faced street is improved from Stage 1 parking areas to Lar- penteur Avenue; (d) Occupancy allowance for Stage 1 with only a Southerly exit to Larpenteur Avenue, 3. No Building plan approval will be given by the- Village Council for Stage 2 until complete and improved access meeting Village Street standards is provided and extended connecting between North St. Paul Road and Larpenteur Avenue. 4. A dedication of 60 ft. of right -of -way shall be surrendered from the North end of Beebe Road to the north property line of the Phase 2 tract. This dedication shall be entirely given from the current fee title Molder (Mr. Fred Moore). The alignment shall be such that it parallels the hest property line of the Phase 2 tract in its entirety. n-ie responsibility for this entire improvement as described in this 7`4 recoin -- mendation shall be borne by. the developers of the tract and Mr. Fred Moore. All access to the hill High School property shall be restricted and no access should be allowed, ., 5. The Village should acquire the necessary 60 ft. ri_ght of way for the length of Beebe road and that distance I \for uh to I \;()1-I -jI St. Paul liLn. its from the tracts north propor-ty line. lmrrove ment of these portions of the overall street betvecn Lar- penteur Avenue and North St. Paul limits should bc- uncler.tal�en and improved by regular condcmnation and assefsment. 6. The site plan shall be revised to indicate the additional 30 ft. st. dedication off the West Side of the Please 2 Tract and the structures indicated shall be so appropriately relocated to conform to this requirement. 70' All of Phase 2 shall be appropriately planned and developed with water and sewer facilities simultaneously with Stage 1 of Phase 2. This utility recommendation means that eater atd sewer shall be planned and installed to adequately serve all of Phase 2 at the same time as Stage 1 is undertaken even though Stage 2 might not be able to be allowed clue to street .improvement absences; 8. Stage 1 of Phase 2 shall execute physical dekrc.lopment by t,1til d -- ing permit within 9 months (September 1, 1970) or all of Phase 2 approval shall be automatically recinded by Council. 9. Ilse developers and /or Mr. Moore shall deposit prior to issuance of occupancy permit for Phase I, Escrow Amount of $10,000.00 with the Village to have the Village Engineer perform a utility (water- sewer) study necessary for the Village to adequately i service the entire Phase 2 area. The Escrow Agreement involy -- ing the Village engineering studies for Please I shall be. re- solved to the Village attorney's approval. 18 12/17 e-4-. I Seconded by Councilman Greavu, Ayes - Mayor Axd ah 1, Councilmen Greavu, Haugan and Wiegert. Nay - Councilwoman Olson. Councilwoman Olson voted nay based on the generalities and that we again vyill be faced with interpretations of this whole thing. e. Councilman. Viegert moved ado tion of the Planning Commission recommendation for the stud of the Fred Moore Development or Forest Green Permit re uestin; a total concept lannina approach, studying Alternate flan 7A, conditioning the extension of Rip_l_ey Road. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes -- Mayor Axdahl, Councilmen Greavu, Haugan and Wiegert. Councilwoman Olson was absent from the meeting when the vote was taken. NEW- BUSI -SS (continued) 2. Building Plan Review (Medical Clinic) Upper Afton Road. a. rianager Miller presented a request from Dr. .Tcrom� al��:r.r_ to approve building plans for a medical clinic to be e - .ct-ed o;t the rthside of Upper Afton Road just west of Centur Avenue. The pro - pos i builcl�.�1g wotticl be 1 block btii.1dinp, :�inj ��tor��, t > >i.tl� ��r�� diin in�. '.ons of 26' x 4Ut or 1040 squad °c f ect o floor-area. . b. Admin trator Seida presented the !ta report recommending ap- proval of th building plans with condi ons. C . Dr. Jerome K fer, applicant, e - lained the specifics of tl,.e plans. Dr. Ka:uf er introdu d Gordon Delm t, representative of Piz-: y-Pak Store, who stated he did no foresee a problems with Dr. Kaufer entering into an' agreement to u ' lize e 20 ft. easement, between the proposed Medical Clinic and the st e for access drive purposes. d. Councilman Wie rert m ed Proval of the buildir , plans with the following conditions: The mansard roof o be entirely ound the building; accepting aluminum mansar shakes, but it is t to bo Coll S:Ldered. a pre- cedent, being llowed because of the cat: on; the break off block be of ' depth; the rear 79 feet e grassed, subject to a landscapin plan approval by staff; obtai ' ng a bu ildint permit within 30 days; submission of an easement a ,-dement from Kelton Enterpr' es, Inc, to utilize the 20 ft, strip or access drive purpos ; moving the building 2 feet west; movi g the south park- ing 1 t 5 feet west; moving the north parking to 10 feet_ north to low backing maneuverability; a north parking ot lighting pl and staff approval of any and all on site signing. SgEonded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 19 12/17 October 7. 1971 Transcript of Discussion on Road to LarpenteUr Forest Green.: Time Extension Request W i egert (speak i ng of cond i t i ons that were to be f ul f i I I ed 1 n Phase I) How about, paving that easterly I eg of the road or the road now used to the south by Phase I - Are we on record saying that there be a Y road going south - one 1 eg to. come f rom Phase I and one to come from Phase II - the construction road - was that not decided to be a permanent road? Bailey: Not apart of Phase I. Wiegert: It is being used by Phase I people, and does relieve a burden on Ripley and Furness, etc. Can it be so i d i f ied into a .permanent access for that Phase I area? Bailey: I' m sure it could. Wiegert: Then would we not be well off to have that thing paved before we go through the winter with all the slop and mush coming in the spring, which then would mean they would not use that road, but then would go back to Furness and Ripley. Could we make. that part of this whole thing? Is it desirable? Is it proper? Bailey: I guess may advise would . be you could do that - the ordering of a condition of that nature, however, is contrary to the condition that was originally established, Olson: The Forest Green apartments are advertising in the paper to use Beebe Road to get to this. They have established a condition here, too, by directing people by that. When they do this, then I think there is a publ is responsibil ity to see to it that there is a road that is proper. Part of that first phase road to the south was for the construction traf f ic and certainly at this point if it is for the access, that road should be completed. Wi exert : There seems to be a w i l I ingness on the part of the developer to have that road a T-shaped road. I would I ike to get it in writing somehow because I think it's a good solution. Olson: Mr. Moore did say that and I'm not sure he made a firm commitment that the area could be used as a bike path or a walkway for the kids because of the school area; apparently now they are getting chased off. Wiegert: I don't know whether he made a firm commitment. I'm not even sure he agreed to it. We stated we would I ik-e to see it doneU Greavu: I think it was - we "hold him harmless" if anything happened, 20 Attachment 8 W i egert : I think that was the method, yeah, A pedestrian walkway or bikeway, or whatever, across the I property - but as you indicate, he was not firm about *t Olson: I think he had some reservations about it, but I don't think he was opposed to it. I don't know whether we ever ursued it. p W i egert : I don't think it was written in, Greavu: I know we talked about it because the f act he was concerned about . W i egert (Speaking to rep. from For Green) What is Your intention regarding the road to the south and the paving of it? yep.: 1 can onl y speak as • the contractor and I've never been instructed to do so. We do have a stabiliz k ed base on it of crushed rocu Whether the owners intend to pave it or not I don't know, , GreaVU: I WDUI d just as soon they pave it if they are going to use that road for access, Baileys: This was only intended to be a construction road ft i Wi egert : Right, since then there has been some discussion with the owners that it might be desirable to continue this arrangement, then another leg of that road for Phase II. it seems to me to be an admirable suggestion - one that should solve lots of problems. I woul d 1 i k e to f ormal ize it as such - is what I guess we are driving at . Olson: How Would Phase II get in there? Wasn't that a part of that motion? Before occupancy approval of Phase I, Phase II portion must be finally resolved in detail and approved and a road south to Larpenteur to be constructed to handle construction traffic and provide another access-. I guess we need an attorney's opinion on what that means. I don't think it has really been resolved, Wi egert : The original concept was that this be built +or construction purposes and then abandoned. The permanent road would be from the west. Now it appears, and it seems to me, Mr. Moore has accepted this concept and feels it to be a good one, that this can be a Y and the fear was the traffic from Phase II would go to Furness. This road could function to allow Phase I access to LarpenteUr and Phase II access to Larpenteur and Y shaped. But the fear was if a road were allowed from Phase II to Phase I that they'd head right east; and those people were not entitled to this access. This access could work southerly to the benefit of that property, both Phase I and Phase II and to the residents on the east. I'm sure the residents of the apartment 21 area would much prefer to go south rather than cut through the neighborhood, 01 son: I would take exception to your., interpretation. Your interpretation is not in writing anywhere, What was defined? That is what we have been trying to figure out* Wiegert: Okay, i will say then that my interpretation in sitting here and working on the thing is that that was what was si intended; however that would appear. to me, in later discussions, have been changed to what I am saying - that a Y road is more preferable to the developer and to us and to the neighborhood; that he has thought it Could benefit him. Otherwise, if that were not the caseq the original concept would be preferable. I would not like to see it closed. I would I ike to see it made into a proper road and used in a Y shape. 22 _ a sy i Bailey '.1-3eic'a VZJ..lage 01annez Vi-11-age of !•�a.Plevnod 133 0 Frost- I • MERIDIAN CORPORATION fY�ZlS(ixLGCGGQ'�t- �C�?t.�l/CGGZ i�tf,.1 730 HENNEPIN AVENUE SUITE 602 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55403 PHONE: 339 -7287 Maplewood , 11ime so-ta 55109 ro CL' 1571 VILLAGE orr- MAPLEWOOD 8 October 1971 .� 1 LLfk6E- tZ.. V I LLEE: , Ass-T �. P 0 F Lear 14r., veicla . . I discussed with 1--le. BIZ McGlynn of McGlynn -Gar 'esker, the developers of Forest Gre�:n, -th��t: at t� l Oc tobcr 7'th Cot:nc'i 1 rneeti.nc; scincone mrnti.on-�d p Zvi ncr the 0011 S L-3-- i�ct. -.cII Y.vx1:i . _- 1IC t:�l1.S 7�0�'.d ;r ;'3S �'Ll11•t only for COnr-�,�''l1C'�J.r�I'1 I�LIl';7'.�SC:� axlcl �:�i:1::: h'.;V�� i!rJ :�r-' 'r 'r �'2St J�'� tn,-=, larld OI1 e1 trig �' SJ_C.�,�, O this I�7cad, l �'. I .�.,.,.� z ... �..:..�. .c. �� tt..:� L �. •�.. wou' d take >+�ri�cdate s to L - -cc�: o1 cc�r.Strl:.c L on rcaz� . In b "C'C:C�.1.Iy';f; ��ll::: %tt ~c��:i <..�:1 L) C',1r'�:?Ca �•ti' 1'►?�✓C: II'��C ��Z�1 <�I�►��JIIC�IZ 1:;� tC_� J ;��V�.'. this area. and, c• catner pe�.ttincy, , con �structi on or this c•:ox 1. srloti l.d eDp co.rn>ence no 1;-:1--ter trvaZ i•londay, , October 11. t Lr Frank Jackson - will be in contact with you also whcn we con7nnence the tree plantings. The . tree farm that is supplying our trees for this project has advised us that it is still too early in the fall to plant trees . - .oV.ever, it is still our intention to complete this wor-,< after the f first hard frost. If there should be any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Fe i e-.�l V �. '��y s DM/prm cc: McGlrih- GarmakPr `jrtr�? j 23 Attachment 9 r Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes all. 2; fr. Elmer Stanke, 910 E. County Road C, reported to the Council e work that as done on the sanitary sewer connection to his mother's home at 930 E** County oad C. Arkon Construction excavated the sewer connection -t the prop' ert y line and found a railroad log that was there. The connect' n was re- paired. Mr George Seidel from B. T. S. C. , consultant engineer firm asked iir. Stanke to P ro ide water to flush out the sewer service and 1 S -anke did thus himself a d is submitting a bill for the work he. had o do. Mr. Stanke reques ed his driveway put g the Sewer back in shape and that the `•tanager en- courage artment Foreman to see to it tha Arkon cot:rplete the job, P H UNFINISHED BUSINESS a or Axdahl requested tha because of t/ko our, Item H -4 be discussed, y q at this time. q 4. Request for Improvement of loster P a. Mana ger Miller stated a gr p f young people are present to present a tition requesting full impro ement of Gloster Park. $1,000 is included P q in the 1972 Budget for the lop do of a pleasure skating rink at that park. b. Mr. dike Vlasiluk, who ves in the Gloster Park Area, stated the petitio was for construction of s ating rims, p ensure and hockey. The hockey rink at Hazelvood Scnoo had been taken d m and he wondered if the board,, were available. Volun eers would construct the boards if they could be obtained. C. The young people of the area spoke on behalTs, of the request. d. Councilwom Olson moved that the matter of im. Quinn Gloster Park be referred to s off to investiz ate ossibilities of � �z t car. be done and re ort back o Council at the next meeting. Seconded y Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. e. Ma or Axdahl cor.1mended the young men for their effort in surveying the mmunity to see what the people wished. It was a very worthy step on eir part. One of the reasons, in the past, that he has voted against i . rovements, such as buildings in some of our parks, is so t' �t we mioZt get some operation type of rinks and backstops etc. 1. Planned Unit Development - Phase II (Forest Green) was raised a. Manager Miller stated that at the last meeting the question] of kilether or not the developers of Forest- Green had the right to close the road be- tween Phase I of the development and Beebe Road. Since the road is not a dedicated public right -of -way no iuLmediate action could be taken to open the roadway. Enclosed are minute records of the development of the Forest Green - Fred Moore project. The attorney,- has previously stated that the condition of a roadway to the south is a matter of Council interpretation.. The developers of Phase III have requested a time extension, and staff n is recommended that that extension be allowed due to the fact that the passim 24 10/211-1 Attachment 10 s of the original deadline date of September 1, 1971 occurred due to re- quirements of the village. 'rhe item. was carried over to this meeting in order to clear up the question of whether the road to the south was meant to be for construction traffic only or for all vehicular traffic. b. Councilmen Greavu read his motion made on August 7, 1969 regarding the road: "Councilman Greavu moved approval of the Fred Moore Planned Unit Develop- ment provided there be a 30 foot setback on the East side, that th.e de- veloper bear the cost of water improvement; 324 is the total number of units, development commence within 15 months for the first phase, that access to Furness Street will be only at the north and the south ends of the project, that it will be only three buildings not four, that the seconc stage have no access to Furness Street, occupancy permit for the first phase only on the approved plans by the developer for the second phase, that a road south to Larpenteur be constructed to handle construction traffic and provide another access. " c. Manager Miller stated that there has been no order from the Village to close this road. Staff has attempted to contact the officials of the development, but have been unable to do so. d. Harvey Kaplan, attorney for the owners of the apartment complex, state( e. . Mayor Axdahl asked if it was the Council's desire that the road be opened. Council stated yes. f. Mr. Kaplan assured the Council that the chain will be removed tomor- row morning and the road will be open. g. Mayor Axdahl read the conditions stated in the December, 1970 minutes. "All construction traffic access from Larpenteur Avenue only; No occupancy to any portion of Stage 1 until a hard surfaced street is improved from Stage 1 parking areas to Larpenteur Avenue; I Occupancy allowance for Stage I with only a Southerly exit to Lar- penteur Avenue. Stage 1 of Phase 2 shall execute physical development by building permit within 9 months (September 1, 1971) or all of Phase 2 approval shall be automatically recinded by Council." h. Councilman wiegert moved to refer to staff the matter of paving, and the timing of the road to the south, the eastern portion of that road, for discussion etv7een t:Le various people involved, ine staff f is to attempt to establish an aczrreement with the developer x-, en this 1-7 0 ill be feasible. 25 10/21 that perhaps, mistakenly, the owner thought it was this Council's desire that the road not be used. I t was ,for that reason and no other reason r that ity to the road was shut off. Mr. Kaplan stated he speak affirmatively for the owner, regarding y � o 0 didn't have the author - the construction of this road. If it is the desire of the Council to reopen this construction road � he has no reason to believe the owner will not open it p e. . Mayor Axdahl asked if it was the Council's desire that the road be opened. Council stated yes. f. Mr. Kaplan assured the Council that the chain will be removed tomor- row morning and the road will be open. g. Mayor Axdahl read the conditions stated in the December, 1970 minutes. "All construction traffic access from Larpenteur Avenue only; No occupancy to any portion of Stage 1 until a hard surfaced street is improved from Stage 1 parking areas to Larpenteur Avenue; I Occupancy allowance for Stage I with only a Southerly exit to Lar- penteur Avenue. Stage 1 of Phase 2 shall execute physical development by building permit within 9 months (September 1, 1971) or all of Phase 2 approval shall be automatically recinded by Council." h. Councilman wiegert moved to refer to staff the matter of paving, and the timing of the road to the south, the eastern portion of that road, for discussion etv7een t:Le various people involved, ine staff f is to attempt to establish an aczrreement with the developer x-, en this 1-7 0 ill be feasible. 25 10/21 swr..�ia�..�.ai�i�w��r:'— -- .— •.". - t -�� -1 ..i...i J� ...�. . , r . ... _ � . r ..'.. • i : 2�... ... .. � ..► i S cond ed by Councilman 1Iaugan e Ayes - all* Bahl asked what kind of format should be us at the July 31, 1972 2. M or Ax � meeting. Counci requested Planning. Commission to prop re a presentation, relative to the land se plan. Staff to prepare a repo on the utilities and roads in the area. � Commissioner Si er stated that the P nni.ng Commission, on July 24, 1972, will be reviewing the Land Use Plan or that area. 3. Mayor Axd a hl stated th e will be earings b } the Metro Sewer Board on Jule Y 26 and Jul 27 regarding the wer C st Allocation Study. They expect to take . final action on August 24th. 4. Mayor Axd ah 1 stated there i als a hearing can September 14th relative to the five year Metro Seu er Capital provem to 1 son wond red if it was ro iated in the budget for a I�ew� 5. Councilwoman 0 P�� Letter and could this .inc de the guidelines or permits, etc. Village Finance e D ' ector Ashworth stated Ju 15th was the dean line for a preliminary sleet h. iIo efully it will be turn d over to tile_ publisher by y P September 1, ] 2o i • the Staff had investigate the drainage problems 6. Councilman C avu asked i f . .? at Minnclialia Av slue and Bartelmy Lane. . Village ngineer Collier sated Staff had investigated nd will notify Council when t e report is completed. • d checked the feasibil y of Water Service 7 Coun lman Greavu wondered if Staff had for Cr e tview Drive* Collier stated Staff had investigated and at thi time can Village Engineer t wa the improvement can be appropriated within the dit improve- no not see any y P ment project. • d she would like to know about the 'road to the SOW-!" 8. Councilwoman Olson state in the Fred Moore project. Before more action is taken on that property, what any can be done to get this road completed. This is the question she would like to - have answered by the next meeting or as soon as possible. 1 stated he had some of t Village Attorney Don Lais s he material there, if Council conditions were adopted in wished him to comment a little. At the time the �� be 1 b councilman Greavu that, among other things, a road sotit 1969, a motion y 11ion to handle construction purposes and provide another access. , constructed • rater alls for a road to the south an In 197 O h e was asked to interpret this. I t c p interpretation as to what Council's intent. was, t•Jl�atcver is just a matter of P - The requirement was it was it was a condition of development nor Phase 1. c: q ` constructed in Phase 1. for access- purposes. Subsc q- ,Lc:1t that there be a road to that time there was corrrnent that the intent was there was to be a per-,lanent _ . or access to the project. lie thought it really comes ...� road to the south f r or not this is what Council said if they wanted a ccess to it, back to whethc • 26 Attachment 11 7/20 /7Z— ... . fy, �•. �.w.L.►.rr.rr../L...a.�•.�.. ...�: .• .. then ... .. i Z..• .. • .••. •w. •. ti .. • • ' that was the intent of the resolution, ... .. It should •w• ..i.. .. Y.w_ �..rJ.r- .....r be clear enough, so then the Village could require that this is one of the conitions. , K Both Councilman Wiegert and Councilman Greavu agreed that it had been their understanding and intention that a permanent access road to the south was one of the conditions of Phase I of Forest Green Development. 9 Councilman Nie ert stated he had clippings from the Star on rental sub " ty g \AID)MINI , which has been on an experimental basis in Yansas City. Ile un rstands o expand !.,,to Pittsburgh* Councilman 1Jiel;er t wondered i. f Coupe ' . Would call the attention of this to the Human Relations Commission/.X, see c,�l�at lities there are for this area, TRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1r. D nald O1m:.tead resented the Insurance �;om.mittee' s.,report on the Village 1. r .P insurance vera e He presented the bids from several companies . Bituminous; g Casualty Com any is recommended for acceptance@ r`- f• i Following ur.:het discussion, Counciluoman )ls�n moved to accept the rec�lm- mendation o the Insurance Committee and award- the insurance coveraoe to Bituminous C< <.ua l tv Com anti , f i b Cou ilman Hau an, .� Ayes - Mayor A.xdahl, Council. oman Seconded y g Olson. Councilmen lia,i g an acid Motion carried* 2a Manager miller suggested 1 Nays _ Councilman Greavu. 1972 as a date. to discuss the water stud 3 This date was agreeable to /the\Counc it e Manager Miller stated th ' Staff ,ha received a petition to construct curb and 3' . g Because the etiti �n gutter in front of 1•Ir. Buet s home at 287 Bea•Tn Avenue. _ a p �n�:d b 100`' /, a - hearin is not neede Staff recommends Council accept t'le 1S Sly, y petition and the prelimi"ry report. Councilman Greavu %introduced the f of lowi 72 - 7 - 160 resolution and moved its adoo� ion: WAIL , i REAS a p eliminary report has been prepare by the Vi] lt-iF; h e Engineer with 1. respecL to laic: c iir ruction of curb t rid guL Ler and n( c :.ti'1rY v t 1 c.c t rucoi1!; on the north si e of Beam Avenue from McKnight Road to 123 feet ea.sLerly, and En Engineer has advised this Council tha the aforesaid improvement WHEREAS , said g is feasible nd should best be made as proposed by the Co cil and that the estimate cost of sa' improvement is $350 and e Council deems it necessary and exile ient that the V'illagc ,� S, the Village � of f Ma lewood construct the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the report, an( WHEREAS, all owners of real property abutting upon the impro enlent herein de-- scribed y 'b d b petition received by the Council on July 20, 1972, have requested the 27 i N MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Fred Moore Special Use Permit Transfer DATE: August 23, 1972 Situation FROM: VILLAGE MGRO REFERRED TO: _ f COUNCIL VILLAGE CLERK FItIVICE DIRECTOR DIR. OF CONI. DEVELOP. G��. OF PARIQ F. REC. -wow D1 R. OF VUB. S�1FE1Y DIR. OF PU3. NORKS OT H E 41- D[k1 E At the August 17, 1972 Council meeting the proponents addressed the Council relative to this permit transfer request. Specific address was given to the various Commissions which had been referred this matter and the delays the proponents have encountered, The Council acted to table this matter until its September 7, 1972 meeting, Based upon the innumerable meetings wherein reference continually crops up regarding to issues: 1. The "road to the south"; and 2. The uncompleted conditions regarding Phase I portion It is this office's best guess that these two issues will surface again at the Council meeting at time of permit transfer consideration. Therefore, this office writes this memo to refresh memories and to outline the reasoning of this department to aid all involved parties in the consideration of this item. Road to the South Issue The following inventory of history provides, in this office's opinion, insight to answering the road to the south issue: 1. August 7, 1969 - The Village Council was presented with a staff report which indicated and predicted access and traffic problems. In that report an alternative was given which indicated lowering the density along the Furness Street side and restricting traffic thereto only to Furness Street while the westerly portion of the site would be oriented by access to Holloway and Larpenteur Avenue. 2, August 7, '1969 - The Village Council approved the revised Fred Moore site plan with : 1. Prase I access to Furness only at the north and South ends of the project. 2. That only 3 not 4 buildings of 36 units each are allowed in Phase I 3. That 2nd stage have no access to Furness 4. That a construction road to the south to Larpenteur be provided as another access, Note: The issue has been these minutes as to what was meant by "provide another -access" recall by this staff was that discuss centered on construction traffic to keep it out of the neighborhood or the use of local streets therein. Such recall 28 Attachment 12 N r a is based upon the reason that the Council made clear in its approval conditions that Phase II could only have access to the south and north but not to Furness so. it is automatically assumed that access will occur to the south in the future whenever Phase II would develop. It seemed reasonable to conclude that: (1) The construction road would and could only be used for construction traffic for Phase It and (2) Should such construction road be so located initially it could serve as the future access road to the south for Phase II. (3) Certainly Phase II would not have access to Furness Street thus ruling out any practical street system which would give access to Phase II road to the south . (4) That Phase I would be vehicle access oriented to Furness Street only, 3. December 17, 1970 - The Village Council reviewed and conditionally approved a revised Phase II Plan for the project. This Council review included discussion and plan examination of access routes to the north and south for the Phase II portion. Further, the Council knowing of all the conditions and history involved acted to approve a specific site plan, as well as endorse and adopt a road corridor pattern plan for the whole affected area - but particularly as it related to Phase II and its north -south access routes, The Council's action taken did not include any conditions on the construction road already in existence nor did the approved plans by the Council designate any access road along the alignment of the existing construction road. Consequently, this office concludes the following based upon the December 17, 1970 Council action: 1. Council approved ancr designated the southerly access route by action of its plan and corridor plan approvals - and it did not include the existing construction road either by reference description or graphics but instead graphically indicated a complete different alignment extending to the west side of Phase II of the project. 2. The Council's action secured the access road route to the south and north for Phase II and thereby satisfied the condition required for such in initial approval of August 7, 19690 3. The Council designating or requiring 2 southerly accesses - one for each Phase was never required in any approvals given by the Council and that to consider imposing such as a requirement is inconsistent with any approvals or conditions previously imposed by the Council upon which the Permit Molder (Fred Moore) has relied upon. 4. August 12, 1971 - The Village Council conducted arzLadoptedaresolution 71 - 8 - 168 which included ordering of street construction as a part of project 71 - 17 on Beebe Road from Larpenteur Avenue to Holloway. Further, such street portion of the public hearing and engineer's accepted feasibility report by Council indicated an alignment not utilizing the existing constructiol road but rather indicates alignment extending along the west property line of Phase II. Again, this office concludes that: (1) Council knowing of previous established approved plans by them on December 17, 1970 reinforced the location of the access road route to the south by 29 ordering of a street project, (2) Council did not expand the ordered .project to include the construction road portion thus it must be assumed that the Council recognized: a, The lack of public need for u s ch extension; b. The conflict that such a p ttern of street. would have to allowin Phase 1T traffic to Furness which was disa g conditions of Au 7 llowed by Council August 1969. co The adverse effect such street woul,d!. have upon the f r8gmenta Lion and redevelopment of the land south of • 2 streets bisect it, the Project particularly if Road to the South; Conclusions: This office concludes that: 1. The initial August a, 1969 road to the south condition has been satisified as to location as a result of multiple actions of P the Village Council to designate and order a street project of improvement. 2. The construction road portion between , the north end of Beebe .Road and the south property line of Phase I was and remain intended for occupancy traffic nor s a construction road only not secured by the Village Council for such or ,guaranteed! to be .improved. 3. The Council cannot, in this office's opinion, require an additional road to the south to service Phase I unless it orders rs a project through normal assess- ment practices - for whi6h unique assessment roblem P s would result regarding. dead end street and benefited properties. 4. The Permit. Holder has relied on the • initial conditions and has subsequently cooperated with -them as` relates to the road - to - th additional road to - the.- south a south* To� require an . condition at this time explodes the whole subject ec of reliance on initial conditions both b t Holder, � t y he Permit as well as, the neighborhood affected as it relates to opening opportunities. for Phase II P g up through neighborhood traffic. through the neighborhood should another connec road to the south be now wanted by the Villa ge. tang 5. The road issue to the south in 1 • • , this office's s opinion, is a mute issue as to location corridor. The Village still awaits is the deed dedications as imposed for such at the December 17, 1970 meeting, 8 6. The construction road from om Phase I parking lot to north end of Beebe Road should be closed for the followin g reasons: a. The construction of Phase I is complete b. The Village by causing the road to be kept open is a party to encouraging crossing of public rights or controls, c. The Village has no legal way f maintaining • Y i g or requiring the road to be maintained -since it is not an approved wa ublic for Phase I. P y for occupancy traffic 30 Uncom2leted Conditions Regarding Phase I Portion Continued comments are referred to some unspecified conditions regarding Phase I portion. This Office has been satisfied that those specific conditions required to Phase I have been satisfactorily complied with. Most comments related to . this Office's attention have involved maintenance and mowing of lawn areas. This office knowns of no municipal regulations governing such except for nuisance and weed control. As regards landscaping .completion, this office was authorized by Council action of Building Plan approval for Phase I to approve a landscaping plan for the area. Such has been done and further installed to the satisfaction of this office, This office indicates, in this report that in the administrative judgment of this office, that required conditions regarding-Phase I portion and its development have been complied with in accordance with Village Council orders. For those who claim non- compliance this office stands waiting for specific claims which can be related to the actual required .conditions or codes of Maplewood* 31 J RESOLUTION: SOUTHWINITS APARTMENTS PUE1 Pursuant to due call and not-ice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said City on the day of 198 at 7 p.m. The following members were present; The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Continental Development Corporation initiated a conditional use permit for a multi-family PUD in a zoning district I-ocated easterly of Beebe Road and northerly of Larpenteur Avenue which facility is proposed t . o accommodate 120 apartment units and is described as follows: Lot 19 Block 2, Southwinds of Maplewood 2nd Addition WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as +01 1 ows: This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on March 20 and April 39 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be 2e The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 198 Notice thereof was published and mailed P ursuant to law. "All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commissions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOEI CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit be approved for a multi- +amily housing F'UD on the basis of the following findings-of -fact: is The use is in conformity w I ith the City's comprehensive pl an and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the pub ic heal th , safety or general wel + are . 3s The use would be located, designedg maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district and the neighborhood in general a 32 Attachment 13 ^�~ The use Would not depreciate property walu�s in that it ' provides ' des�yor �n ample 1e buffer of open space and vegetation r | single-family esidential areas to where �t ��t�r;ec�s with r the east. ` 5. The use Would not b/ hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential 'surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, -fumes, water pollution, i water run-off, vibration general uns g ht1ines� , electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would gene rate only mn1nimal vehicular traffic on lor:al streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe a. access or �arkzng needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. �7 . The uese Would be serviced by essential public services-D, such ` as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and P arks and will not inordinately burden publicfacilities and services. B The use would not create excessive additional requirements at ^ blic .,cost for public facilities and services; an d would not P u be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use wou preserve ve and +ncorporate the site's natural and scenic features- into the development design. � 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. t t the f ll ing conditions: Approval is subjec o e o ow ` 1 Adherence to the site plan, dated March 277 19B9, and the ^ conditions approved b y the Community Design Review Board. 2. All use� shall conform with the R-3 zoning district . requirements. 31 Noise levels shall not exceed PCA standards at any residential property line. 4. No outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. 5. Removal of the proposed roadway connection from Green Gate to Beebe Road through the subject property. 6. The trees along the north and east property lines shall remain undisturbed. 33 70 An eight-foot-wide asphal t wal kway for publ is use shal 1 be constructed from Furness Street to,Beebe Road. The e'Xistinci easement may be al tered to al I ow f or curves in the path if approved by Williams Brothers Pipeline. An eight-foot-widen asphal t wal keway shat I be constructed from the past-west path described above to the park - i ng Iota E3 A five-foot-wide concrete sidewalk, shall be constructed along Beebe Road from the north property I ine to Larpenteur Avenue and al ong Larpenteur Avenue from Beebe Road. to the east property linen 98 This permit shall be subject to review after one. year from the date of approval based on the procedures in City code. 'Adopted this day of 198 Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS" CITY OF MAPLEWOOD the enders i gned be i ng the dul y qual i + i ed and appo i nted C1 erg:: of the City of Maplewood, Minnesotaq do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the .attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Map lewoodq held on the day of 9 196 , with the original on file in my office, and the same is a +ul I true and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permits Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 9 198 a City Cl erk, City of Maplewood 34 RESOLUTION: FRED MOORE FULL Pursuant to due cal I and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said City on the day of 196 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a revision to the conditional use permit for a planned unit development (PUD) to omit the requirement for a road from LarpenteUr Avenue to the PUE, at the +ol I owing-described property: Al I that part of the NE 1/4 of the SE 114 1 ying westerly of Furness Street and al I that part of the East 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22, except the N 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 and except that part of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 lying westerly of Furness Street* This property is also known as the Green Sate apartments, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as +01 lows: This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on March 20 and April 39 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be 2 The Maplewood City Council held a pub 1 ic hearing on 9 1989. Notice thereof was published and mailed Pursuant to laws All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written' statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commissions NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the original Fred Moore PUD is hereby amended to eliminate the south road connection to Larpenteur Avenue-on the basis of the following findings -of -+ act : I'm The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. Said 35 Attachment 14 roadway is not needed and the extension of Hol I oway Avenue wil I provide a more beneficial general purpose access for the neighborhoods 2w The amended CUP/PUD wil I not be detrimental to the publ. ic heal th saf ety or general wel f are 38 The amendment to eliminate the south roadway connection wit. I be compatible and in character with the surrounding zoning district and the neighborhood in general because it wil I preclude the infiltration of additional traffic into the adjacent single-family residential areas 46 The elimination of the roadway will not depreciate property values in the general areas 5s The elimination of the south roadway connection will not create hazardous or detrimental conditions for surrounding land usese 6a The elimination of the south roadway will result in less traffic on surrounding local streets than would be the case if the roadway connection were made. 7a The amendment will have no effect on essential public services. The roadway is not required' to facilitate fire services E3 The amendment wil 1 not create excessive additional requirements at publ is cost for publ is fac i I it ies and servicese 96 The amendment will have no effect on the site's natural and scenic f eat ures. 10. The amendment will not cause adverse environmental effectso 36 Adopted this day of 4; 198 a Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY sse CITY OF MAPLEWOOD the undersigned being the duly qUal if ied and appointed Cl erg of the City Of Maplewoodg. Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1 198 1 with the original on f i l e in my off ice, and the same is a full true. and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permits Witness my hand as such Cl erk- and the corporate seal of the City this day Of 1 198 • City Cl erk, City of Maplewood 37 Planning commission 4�4' Minutes 4-3-89 Commissioner Dempsey seconded Ayes-~Ax%dahlvAyers, Barrettq Car l ' The sta repoy---t was presented and di CUSsed with the commiss^ ers The applicant was n present at the meetingg Commissioner ers moved the Pl nning recommend - for preliminary plat, code variations, ode varia e and "relax urban" urban street, e City an — --- - �hb d the fact ie �se �n e additi / � re " . -' '---, -- -- consistent with the City s that �u�cs � proposed Critical A -- p� prohibits approval of with the Critical developments in w Area Plan. econde Ayes If , Ayers, Commissioner F er � - Barrett, Cardinal , %]empsey, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, ^� ^^Sigmundik, Sletten ][1, Cod Amendment: RE District The s ff report was pre sented and d1 = tsseds ~ Co i ssi c»ner Fischer moved approval of t ordinance taining to accessory uses in the RE, re idential state, district. Comm i ss i oner Sl etten seconded Ayes--Ax d 19 Ayers, X9arrett, C dinal , %]empsey, F Fischer, L«z , S i gMun d i k , S l e ten Ville UNFINISHED BUSINESS A ^ Sou 1. 2. �3. thwinds Apartments Revision of the Conditional Use Permit north of the site Conditional Use Permit for this project Preliminary Plat � Planning Commission _5- Minutes 4-3-89 Secretary Olson presented the staff report. E%en Heider, I)irector of Public Works, discussed the proposed trail options with the commissic»ners. A representative of the architect was present and commented on the trail options presented by staff. Pot.,. FrItZ, '42.280 Ripley Street, said he was concerned with the trail de=;tro\/ing some of the natural vegetation in the northern area. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission 1. Approval of the resolution which approves a CUP for a PUD fnr the Southwinds apartments. Approval is recommended on the basis that the project meets the ten findings for a CUP. A|!proval is subject to the following conditions: a. Adherence to the site plan dated 3-27-89 and the conditions approved by the Community Design Review Board. b. All uses shall conform with the R-3 zoning district requirements. c. Noise levels shall not exceed PCA standards at any residential property line. d. No omtdoor storage of recreational vehicles~ boats or trailers. e. Removal of the proposed roadway connection from Green Gate to Beebe Road through the subject property. f. The trees along the north and east property lines shall remain undisturbed, q. An eight-foot-wide asphalt walkway for public use shall be constructed from Furness Street to Peoebe Road. The existing easement may be altered to allow -for curves in the path if approved by Williams Brothers Pipeline. An eight-foot-wide asphalt walkway on at least a ten-foot-wide public easement shall be constructed from the east-west path describr-d above to Larpenteur Avenue. This trail shal'I CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1989 ANNUAL REPORT HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION „ (ice fyi,w-QJ t /0-0- LWI� C�iGU Qi r-U/Ta- �d/�Pi�if fiCY�(GQ/Ji rPmur- 5J au-i cL glsmi2. c TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1 POLICY AND ORGANIZATION 2 COMMISSION ROSTER/ATTENDANCE RECORD 3 CALENDAR OF 1989 ACTIVITIES 4 ACTIVITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN 1989 5 1990 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 8 1990 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 9 APPENDICES COMMISSION BYLAWS A COMMISSION ORDINANCE B HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD NOMINATION FORM AND 1989 AWARD WINNER C ESSAY CONTEST RULES AND 1989 WINNER D CITY OF MAPLE O��VC� 010 • 1830 E.COUNTY ROAD MAPLEWOOD,?1IX\E MINNESOTA � MAPLEWOOD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION March, 1990 TO: Mayor Norman Anderson City Council City Manager FROM: Karla Sand, Chair Human Relations Commission The Maplewood Human Relations Commission respectfully submits its 1989 Annual Report pursuant to Article IV, Sec. 2-75 of the City Ordinance. During 1989 we continued our work toward improving the human relations climate of our community. We look forward to expanding our activities in 1990 and to maintaining relationships with all City officials and departments for the benefit of our residents. Equal Opportwuty Employer POLICY AND ORGANIZATION The MAPLEWOOD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION was created by City Ordinance No. 239 on April 18, 1968. It is the policy of the Commission to fulfill its charge as a partner with the State Department of Human Rights, in securing for all citizens equal opportunity in housing, employment, public accommodations, public services and education; and to work consistently to improve the human relations climate of the comnunity. There are seven members on the Commission appointed for three-year terms by the City Council upon recommendation of the Commission. Meetings are held monthly (except July and August) at 7:00 p.m. on the first Tuesday of the month at Maplewood City Hall. All meetings are open to the public. It shall be the duty of the Commission to implement its policies. Such implementation may consist of reports and/or recommendations to the City Manager and/or the City Council, and to engage in public relations and educational programs as it deems necessary to accomplish established policy. Extra copies of this report are available at the City Hall upon request. Contact the Commission Chairperson through the City Manager's Office (770-4524) concerning any matters relating to the Commission. HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ROSTER AND ATTENDANCE Appointment End of No. Meetings Date Term Attended Carol Engel 1-89 12-89* 8 Sister Claire Lynch 1-89 12-91 8 Scott Rostron 1-89 12-91 5 Karla Sand 1-87 12-89* 9 Paul Sand 1-89 12-91 7 Dawn Vassar 5-89 12-90 5 Pat Williamson 1-89 12-91 9 * Reappointed January 1990 Gail Blackstone (ex officio) Michael McGuire (ex officio) - 3 -- CALENDAR OF 1989 ACTIVITIES JANUARY MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD PRESENTATION FEBRUARY BLACK HISTORY MONTH MARCH APRIL PRESENTATION ANNUAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MAY JUNE JULY/AUGUST NO HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER OCTOBER ESSAY CONTEST LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS ANNUAL MEETING HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD NOMINATIONS NOVEMBER DECEMBER HUMAN RIGHTS DAY ESSAY CONTEST WINNER PRESENTATION -4-- ACTIVITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1989 . . . . GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goals and objectives for the Commission were reviewed and priorities were set for the year. . . _ . COMMISSION VACANCIES Notices of the Commission vacancies were placed in the newspapers, applications were reviewed and several interested persons were interviewed. Three individuals were appointed to the Commission: Carol Engel, Paul Sand, Dawn Vassar. . _ . . PUBLICITY FOR MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY AND HUMAN RIGHTS DAY OBSERVANCES Articles and news releases were placed in the Maplewood Review, St. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch, and the Minneapolis Star Tribune; and messages were displayed on the Ramsey County Home sign and Premier Bank electronic sign. Information packets were distributed to Local schools on the Human Rights Essay Contest and their participation was encouraged. . . . HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD Criteria for eligibility and the Commission's selection process were reviewed for the third annual award. The Award was publicized and nomination forma were mailed out. Three nominations were received: - Claudette Nitti Patricia Svendsen - Tom Thunstrom The Commission recommended to the City Council that Patricia Svendsen be the recipient of the third annual award for her work with the District 622 "Community Bridge" program. Plans were made to present a plaque at the January luncheon meeting of the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce (see Appendix C). — J — . . . . SENIORS AND OTHERS WITH SPECIAL LIVING NEEDS Scott Rostron serves on this Committee as a representative of the Commission. . . . . NO FAULT GRIEVANCE TRAINING Commissioners Engel and Vassar completed basic training to become certified in the No Fault Grievance process. . . . . NO FAULT GRIEVANCE CASES Commissioners mediated several No Fault Grievance cases this year and answered other inquiries about possible discrimination. Areas of discrimination included race, public assistance, age and national origin. . . . . LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION The Commission supported legislation pertaining to amendments to the Human Rights Act. Areas covered in the legislation were people with disabilities, definition of disability, pre-employment inquiries, burden of proof, age, credit and public accommodations. . . . . ESSAY CONTEST The Commission refined the criteria and selection process for the Human Rights Essay Contest. The winner was Melissa Coons (see Appendix D). In recognition of her achievement, Melissa received an award of $100 from Premier Bank. The check was presented by its Chairman, Donald Regan, and President, Jack Hillstrom. In addition, Minnesota Department of Human Rights Commissioner Stephen Cooper attended the ceremony and recognized Melissa as the contest winner. . . . . MEMBER RECOGNITION At the Annual Conference of the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions held in St. Cloud in October, two commissioners were re- elected to the Board of Directors: Karla Sand as Director-at-Large and Pat Williamson as District Director. . . . . OUTREACH ACTIVITIES Commissioner Vassar attended the First Annual Open House of the New Brighton Human Rights Commission. . . . . LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS Maplewood maintained an active role in the League, which is a coalition of local human rights commissions throughout Minnesota. Maplewood Commissioner Sand held the office of Secretary. Commissioners Sand and Williamson attended the two-day conference entitled "Think Globally; Act Locally". Commissioners Vassar, Rostron and Sand attended the all-day Conference on Human Rights Day in December focusing on "Human Rights: A Sound Foundation for a Diverse Nation" sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. Featured speakers included Julius Chambers and James Shimoura. • - 7 - 1990 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES o Promote awareness of human rights throughout the private and public sectors. o Provide No Fault Grievance mediation services. o Encourage and promote greater multi-cultural awareness. o Monitor the City's human rights program. The 1990 goals and objectives of the City of Maplewood's Hunan Relations Commission are going to be accomplished through a variety of planned activities and projects including the sponsorship of an annual student essay contest, the publication of articles in newspapers and periodicals on various current human rights issues, the promotion of human rights matters in the local schools, and greater participation in other local and state committees and commissions dealing with human relations topics. — 3 - CALENDAR OF EVENTS 1990 JANUARY MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD PRESENTATION FEBRUARY BLACK HISTORY MONTH MARCH WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH APRIL MAY CINCO DE MAYO DAY AMERICAN INDIAN DAY JUNE RACE UNITY DAY JULY NO HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST WOMEN'S EQUALITY DAY NO HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER ESSAY CONTEST WORLD PEACE DAY OCTOBER DISABILITY AWARENESS MONTH NOVEMBER NOMINATIONS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD DECEMBER HUMAN RIGHTS DAY ESSAY CONTEST WINNER PRESENTATION - 9 - APPENDICES BYLAWS MAPLEWOOD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Pursuant to Ordinance #239 adopted by the City Council, City of Maplewood, on April 18, 1968, relating to and providing for the establishment, appointment, organization and responsibilities of a Hunan Relations Commission, the said Commission hereby adopts the following bylaws and rules for the conduct of its affairs: ARTICLE I - NAME MAPLEWOOD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ARTICLE II - POLICY It shall be the policy of the Maplewood Human Relations Commission to fulfill its charge as a partner with the State Department of Hunan Rights,in securing for all citizens equal opportunity in housing, employment, public accommodations, public services, and education; and to work consistently to improve the human relations climate of the community. ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP Section 1: Makeup The Commission shall consist of up to seven (7) members, appointed by the City Council, upon recommendation of the Commission. Section II: Tenure A. All terms shall be for a three-year period. B. Unexpired terms shall be filled as provided for in Section 1; however, such appointments shall be for the remainder of the unexpired term. Such appointee is eligible for appointment to another full term(s). Section III: Expiration of Term A. Terms shall expire on December 31st of the year of termination. B. Members whose terms have expired may remain in office until a qualified applicant is appointed. Section IV: Attendance Members must attend at least 70% of the business meetings in a year in order to remain a member in good standing. The Commission may waive this section under extenuating circumstances. Appendix A Bylaws MHRC Page 2 ARTICLE IV - OFFICERS Section I: Makeup The Executive Board shall consist of a Chairperson, a Vice- Chairperson and a Secretary. Section II: Terms A. Officers shall bt elected at the first business meeting in January. B. Officers shall serve for one year, ending December 31. Section III: Duties Chairperson: Shall preside at all meetings. Shall appoint committee chairpersons. Vice-Chair: Shall preside in the absence of the Chair. Shall perform duties delegated by the Chair. Secretary: Shall handle all correspondence. Shall keep meeting minutes. ARTICLE V - COMMITTEES Section I: Appointments The Commission Chairperson may recruit members for committees from the community at large. Section II: Duties A. Committees shalt establish and implement programs in their area of concern, after clearing these programs with the Commission. B. The Committee head will report to the Commission on a regular basis. C. Committees will make recommendations directly to the Commission. Bylaws MNRC Page 3 ARTICLE VI - COMMISSION MEETINGS Section I: Business Meetings Business meetings will be held on the first Tuesday of each month. Section 11: Special Meetings Special meetings may be called by the Chairperson or the Vice-Chair or, under unusual circumstances, by the Staff Liaison. ARTICLE VII - QUORUM A quorum shall consist of a majority of the incumbent members. ARTICLE'VIII - DUTIES A. It shall be the duty of the Commission to implement the policies set forth in Article II. Such implementation may consist of reports and/or recommendations to the City Manager and/or the City Council. B. The Commission is directed to engage in such public relations and educational programs as it may deem necessary to the accomplishment of established policy. ARTICLE IX - AMENDMENTS These bylaws may be amended at any business meeting, by a two-thirds vote of members present - a quorum being present - provided that notice has been given to all members at the meeting immediately preceding the meeting at which the bylaws are to be voted upon. Amended April, 1978 Amended April, 1981 Amended December, 1988 ADMINISTRATION §2-72 ARTICLE IV.BOARDS,COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS' DIVISION 1.GENERALLY Sec. 2-61. Terms of office. Members of all boards,committees and commissions shall con- tinue in their term of office until a successor is duly appointed. (Ord. No. 538, § 1, 3-28-83) Secs. 2-62-2-70. Reserved. DIVISION 2.HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Sec. 2-71. Statement of public policy. It is hereby declared by the city council that it is the public policy of the city to fulfill its responsibility as a partner of the state department of human rights in securing for all citizens equal oppor- tunity in housing,employment,public accommodations,public ser- vices and education,and to work consistently to improve the human relations climate of the city.To this end the city council does adopt this division. (Ord.No.239,4-18-68) State law references—Minnesota human rights act, M.S.Ch.363;state de- partment of human rights,M.S.;363.04 et seq. Sec. 2-72. Established. There is hereby established, within the city, a human relations commission. (Ord. No. 239, § 208.010, 4-18-68; Ord. No. 479, § 1, 1-7-71) *Cross references—Parks and recreation commission,4 21-16 et seq.;planning commission, § 25-17 et seq.; board of appeals and adjustments, § 25-41 et seq.; community design and review board, §25-61 et seq. State law reference—Authority of city council in city operating under Op- tional Plan B council-manager plan of government to create boards,commissions, etc.,M.S.§412.621. Supp.No.2 Appendix B ADMINISTRATION 4 2-85 (1) Adopt bylaws and rules for the conduct of its affairs,includ- ing the election, assumption of duties and definition of re- sponsibilities of officers and committees. (2) Draft a memorandum of agreement with the state depart- ment of human rights for the purpose of determining regula- tory and enforcement procedures. (3) Enlist the cooperation of agencies, organizations and indi- viduals in the community in an active program directed to create equal opportunity and eliminate discrimination and inequalities. (4) Formulate a human relations program for the city to give increased effectiveness and direction to the work of all indi- viduals and agencies addressing themselves to planning, policymaking and educational programming in the area of civil and human rights. (5) Advise the mayor, the city council and other agencies of the government on human relations and civil rights problems. Act in an advisory capacity with respect to planning or oper- ation of any city department on issues of civil and human rights,and recommend the adoption of such specific policies or actions as are needed to provide for full equal opportunity in the community. (6) Develop in cooperation with the state department of human rights such programs of formal and informal education as will assist in the implementation of the Minnesota human rights act,Chapter 363, Minnesota Statutes,and provide for the commission's assumption of leadership in recognizing and resolving potential problem areas in the community. (7) Review, prepare and make a report to the city council by January thirty-first of each year regarding its actions and activities during the year, along with recommendations for changes which the commission may deem desirable. (Ord. No. 239, § 208.040,4-18-68;Ord. No. 297, § 1, 10-21-71;Ord. No.340,§ 1, 12-21-72) Sees. 2-76-2-85. Reserved. Supp.No.2 §2-73 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 2-73. Purpose of division. The purpose of this division creating the human relations com- mission is to secure for all citizens equal opportunity in employ- ment, housing, public accommodations, public services and educa- tion,and full participation in the affairs of this community by such commission assisting the state department of human rights act, Chapter 363,Minnesota Statutes,and by such commission advising the city council on long-range programs to improve community relations in the city. (Ord.No.239,§ 208.020,4-18-68) Editor's note—Chapter 363, Minnesota Statutes, was formerly known as the "Minnesota state act against discrimination," and in known as the "Minnesota human rights act,"pursuant to Laws of Minnesota 1973,Ch.729, State law reference—Unfair discriminatory practices,M.S.§363.03. Sec. 2-74. Composition; appointment; terms; compensa- tion;removal. (a) The human relations commission shall consist of seven (7) members to be appointed by the mayor by and with the advice and consent of the council. Members of the commission shall be ap- pointed with due regard to their fitness for the efficient dispatch of the functions, powers and duties vested in an imposed upon the commission. (b) Members of the commission shall be appointed for terms of three (3) years; except that, any person appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term for which his predeces- sor was appointed shall be appointed only for the remainder of such term. Upon the expiration of his term of office, a member shall continue to serve until his successor is appointed and shall have qualified. The first commission shall consist of three (3) members for a term of two (2) years, and two (2) members for a term of one (1)year. (c) The members of the commission shall serve without compen- sation and may be removed from office for cause by the mayor. (Ord. No. 239,§ 208.030,4-18-68;Ord.No.405,§ 1, 10-14-76) Sec. 2-75. Duties and responsibilities. In fulfillment of the purpose of this division, the duties and responsibilities of the human relations commission shall be to: Supp.No.2 MAPLEWOOD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION NOMINATION FORM HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD (Award criteria on back of sheet) NAME OF PERSON BEING NOMINATED: (Please type or print) ADDRESS: REASON FOR NOMINATION: SUBMITTED BY: ADDRESS TELEPHONE Return this form no later than October 31, 1989 to: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Maplewood City Hall 1830 East. County Road 13 Maplewood, MN 55109 Appendix C MARC - Criteria for Human Rights Award The Maplewood Human Relations Commission will award the Human Rights Award to a citizen or group in Maplewood based on the following accomplishments: -- performed a specific service as a volunteer or paid employee to eliminate discrimination based on sex, race, religion, color, rational origin, creed, marital status, disability, dependence on public assistance, age, or family status. -- showed commitment to protecting and preserving the dignity and worth of all persons. Specific information/instructions on other side. _Pats 14A libdoeadaa. Jane i > Newsbriefs Pat Svendsen is third recipient of M'woocd human rights award The Maplewood Human Relations Commission awarded its third annual Human Rights Award to Patricia Svendsen at the meeting of the Suburban Chamber of Commerce. Patricia is recognized for her leadership of School District 622's Community Education'Community Bridge'program.The Bridge pro- gram provides classes,activities end social events for young adults 17 and over with disabilities. Pat began her involvement with the program as a volunteer and more recently is a paid employee of District 622 Community Education Program.Her involvement includes supervision of the adaptive swim program and implementation of education classes and recreation activ- ities for persons with disabilities.As part of her community responsi- bilities, she encouraged District 622 to purchase the Pacer Puppets. The puppets represent various disabilities and ars now being used in Diitrict elementary schools to promote an awareness of persons with disabilities. The criteria used by the Commission to select a citizen or group in Maplewood consisted of the following:(1)performance of a specific ser- vice as a volunteer or paid employee to eliminate discrimination based on sex,race,religion,color,national origin,creed,marital status,dis- ability, dependence on public assistance,age or family status;and/or (2)demonstration of a commitment to protect and preserve the dignity and worth of all persons. Previous persons who received the Human Rights Award are Ed and Dolores O'Mara in 1987 and Audrey Hughes in 1988. The Maplewood Human Relations Commission is a 7 member mom- nuesion appointed by the Maplewood City Council to assists in secur- ing equal opportunity for community citizens. HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ESSAY CONTEST RULES SUBJECT TITLE: "How Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affects me or someone I know." (A copy of the Declaration is enclosed. You may write about all of Article 26 or one of its three parts.) LENGTH OF ESSAY: 200 - 300 Words ESSAYS JUDGED ON: Content, composition, sincerity, style FORM: Neatly written or typed on one side of paper only. Fill in entry form below and attach to essay. DUE DATE: November 1, 1989 COLLECTION PLACE: Office of School Principal NOTIFICATION OF WINNERS: Individual winners will be notified before December 1, 1989 ARTICLE 26 UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit. (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace. (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children. Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly December 10, 1948 Appendix 0 HUMAN RIGHTS ESSAY CONTEST Melissa Coons was the winner of the Maplewood Hunan Relations Commission's Second Annual Essay Contest. Eighth grade students of Maplewood were invited to submit a 200-300 word essay giving their understanding of Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, December 10, 1948 (Human Rights Day). The $100 check contributed by Premier Bank was presented to Melissa December 14 at a ceremony at City Hall. Commissioner Stephen Cooper, Minnesota Department of Human Rights, also attended the ceremony and recognized Melissa as the contest winner. Article 26 states that every child has the right to go to school for the fundamentals of education. To me, that means I have the right to learn math, to learn how to write, learn to read, learn about my religion, learn how to get along and work with others and learn about history and life today so I can become the best person I can be. I feel it is important for me to learn the fundamentals and work hard in grade school and high school so that when I do reach college and I don't have enough money for the college I need to go to for my career choice, I may be able to get a scholarship. Education should teach me to be proud of my accomplishments and how to learn from my mistakes. All children, no matter what race they are, what religion they belong to or what their physical appearance is, should be treated equally and receive the same fundamentals of education and the same opportunities for education. All children of all nations should be taught to keep an open mind and an open heart toward other nations. Every nation has its own customs, beliefs and advantages, and problems. Only by listening and learning from each other, can we then understand and help each other to keep peace between nations. My parents and I have the right to choose the school I attend, which is St. Peters. My parents need to know what I am learning in school so that all of my abilities are developed and used, and I am getting the best education possible in all of the fundamentals. By Melissa J. Coons . 4.. • • f_ f -... f Planning Commission Minutes 4-3-89 -b- be connected to the South end of the pari:-.inq lot. he This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of approval based or-, the procedures in City codes 2, Approval of the resolution which amends t he Fred Moore CUP/PUli by eliminating the south roadway access to Beebe Roads Approval of the preliminary plat for SOUt.hwinds apartments, subject to the following conditions being satisfied prior to final plat approval Elimination of the original south roadway connection to Beebe Roads b. The provision and recording of cross easementr:;-, rUnninq to all lots to allow for the sale of individUal lots - C, Compliance with all requirements of the City Engineering Department regarding sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer services* do Final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans must be approved by the City Engineer@ es Submittal of a signed developers agreement with required surety for all required public streets9 Utilitiesq erosion control 9 walk ways, and tree plantings +a 111rainage easements., as reqLUired. by the City Engineer 9 shal I be shown on the southeast enrJ of the plat 4 Authorize staf + to request that the City. of St. PaUl e%xtend their trail north to Larpenteur Avenue .,. dahl Ayers, Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes -- It A,- Barrett, Cardinal Elempsey, Fiola, F i scher Larson 9 S i L gmundik, Sletten Ixe COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS As Council Meeting: March 27, 1989.