Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 05-04 & 05-08 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 4 :30 P.M., Thursday, May 4, 1989 and 7 :00 P.M., Monday, May 8, 1989 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 89 -11 A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 88 -30 (December 22, 1988) 2. Meeting No. 89 -1 (January 5, 1989) 3, Meeting No. 89 -6 (March 2, 1989) D. APPROVAL ' OF_- _AGENDA E. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims 2. Donation to Nature Center 3. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 2228 Maplewood Dr. - (Hoffman Corner 0i1) 4. Pay Equity /Comparable Worth 5. Change Order - Gervais Avenue Project 88 -14 F. AWARD OF BIDS G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Planning Commission Survey 2. Hillcrest Assessment Appeals H. NEW BUSINESS 1. Drainage Assessment Policy 2. Final Approval of Bonds, Notes, and Developer's Agreement: Cottages of Maplewood 3. Review of Ordinances 4. Southwinds: Reconsideration I. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2 3 40 5. 6.0 70 80 J. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2, 3. K. ADJOURNMENT OF 5-4-89 MEETING L. RECONVENE: CALL 5-8-89 MEETING TO ORDER M. ROLL CALL N. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Walter Street - Assessment Hearin 2. 7:20 P.M., Establishment of Tax Increment District for Maplewood Crossing and Amendment of the Plan for the Cottages of Maplewood G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 3. Geranium-Ferndale - Call for Assessment Roll and Assessment Hearing__ 0, VISITOR PRESENTATIONS P. ADJOURNMENT OF 5-8-89 MEETING MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Thursday, December 22, 1988 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 88 -30 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. County Road C Water Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Rossbach moved, seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ave approve the Consent Agenda, Items E -1 through E -12 as recommended: 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims as presented: Accounts Pavable: $ 460,486.59 Checks #8502 - #8554 Dated 12 -01 -88 thru 12 -15 -88 $ 262,559.99 Checks #4850 - #5033 Dated 12 -22 -88 - all. to $ 723,046.58 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll: $ 184,825.66 Payroll Checks $ 30,235.56 Payroll Deductions $ 215,061.22 Total Payroll $ 938,107.80 GRAND TOTAL 2. 1989 Budget Revisions Approved to amend the 1989 budget to increase the estimated revenues appropria- tions by $252,500. A transfer of this amount from the Community Development Block Grant funds from the County to the City and then to the developer for the purchase of land for the Cottages of Maplewood. 3. Conditional Use Permit: 1768 McMenemy Street (Hmong Church) Approved the renewal of the conditional use permit for a church at 1768 McMenemy Street for one year, subject to the original conditions of approval. 4. Final Plat: Gonyea's Oak Heights 2nd Addition Approved the Gonyea's Oak Heights Second Addition final plat. 5. Revision of Accountant Position from Part Time to Bull -Time Position Approved revision of the Accountant position from part -time to full -time status at this time so that the appropriate employee group insurance coverages can be revised effective January 1, 1989. 6. Interfund Transfers for Unassessed Utility Departments Approved the following transfers: Debt Service Funds $ 50,800 W.A.C. Fund 1973 Bonds (311) 71,700 Hydrant Fund 1977 Bonds (314) 6,010 Hydrant Fund 1979 Bonds (316) 2,050 Sewer Fund 1979 Bonds (316) $130,560 7. Resolution Designating Certain Bonds Issued in 1986 as Qualified Tax Exempt Obligations Resolution No. 88 - 12 - 214 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CERTAIN BONDS ISSUED IN 1986 AS "QUALIFIED TAX - EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS" A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "Issuer "), issued its $2,490,000 General Obligation Tax Increment bonds of 1986 (the "Bonds ") after August 7, 1986, the effective date of the federal Tax Reform Act of 1986; and B. WHEREAS, when the Bonds were issued, the Issuer made a designation that it intended to qualify under Section 802(e)(3) of H.R. 3838 of the 99th Congress as passed by the House of Representatives; and C. WHEREAS, the issuer covenanted to take such actions as are necessary to effectuate such attempted designation; and - 2 - 12/22 D. WHEREAS, for the Bonds to get the benefit of being designated as "quali- fied tax - exempt obligations" under Section 265(b)(3) of the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code "), it is necessary that the Issuer designate the bonds pursuant to subparagraph (B) of Section 1009(b)(3) of the federal Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 ( "TAMRA ") and Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; and E. WHEREAS, the Bonds qualify for such designation because they are not private activity bonds (or, if private activity bonds, are qualified 501(c)(3) bonds, or refund bonds which were not industrial development bonds or private loan bonds), the Issuer with respect to bonds issued in 1986 is a "qualified small issuer" of $10,000,000 or less of bonds, and not mroe than $10,000,000 of bonds issued in 1986 have been designated: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Designation of Qualified Tax - Exempt Obligations In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the Issuer hereby makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the bonds were issued after August 7, 1986; (b) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code, or, if private activity bonds, they are: (i) qualified 501(c)(3) bonds as defined in Section 145 of the Code, or (ii) obligations issued to refund (or which are part of a series of obligations issued to refund) obligations issued before August 8, 1986, which were not industrial development bonds (as defined in Section 103(b)(2) of the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, as in effect on the day before the date of the enact- ment of the federal Tax Reform Act of 1986) or a private loan bond (as defined in Section 103(o)(2)(A) as so in effect, but without regard to any exemption from such definition other than Section 103 (o)(2)(A)); (c) the Issuer hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obliga- tions" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (d) at the time the bonds were issued, the amount of tax - exempt obligations (Other than private activity bonds, treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds as not being private activity bonds) which had been and were to be issued in 1986 by the Issuer (and all entities treated as one issuer with the Issuer, and all subordinate entities theregf).._.ddr ng ;, calendar Year 1986 was not reasonably expected to did not exceed $10,000,000; and (e) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the Issuer during calendar Year 1986 have been designated for purposes of Section 265 (b)(3) of the Code. - 3 - 12/22 8. Paramedic Bill - Application for Cancellation Approved to cancel the paramedic ambulance service charges for Kevin Bergstrom due to financial hardship. 9. Boxwood Avenue - Change Orders 1 and 2 Resolution 88 - 12 - 215 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 87 -19 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 87 -19 Change Order 1 in the amount of $4,903.92.00. Original amount of Contract was $128,438.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized anddirected to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 1. Resolution 88 - 12 -.,216 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 86 -19 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 87 -19 Change order 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 2. 10. Park Availability Charge (Commercial and Industrial Property). Approved that the Commercial P.A.C. Charge continue at 7% for 1989. 11. Budget Transfer Utilities Expense Approved a budget transfer of $10,000 from 101 -504 -4320 (Public Works Building Maintenance Fund) to 101- 110 -4320 (City Hall Maintenance Fund) to cover the numerous heating and air conditioning problems. 12. Budget Transfer - MAPLEWOOD IN MOTION Approved a budget transfer in the amount of $610.00 from the General Fund Contingency Account to Account 101 -111 -4360 for payment of MAPLEWOOD IN MOTION. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit: English Street and Highway 36 ( Marcor) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Marcor Properties, Inc., for approval of a conditional use permit for a 26,125 square foot retail convenience center with fuel service. - 4 - 12/22 b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Associate Planner Randy Johnson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Director of Public Works Haider commented on the traffic patterns in this area. e. Board Member Roger Anitzberger presented the Community Design Review Board recommendation. f. Jim Winkels, representing Marcor Properties, spoke on behalf of the proposal. Gary Vocal, Architect for the proposed development, also spoke. g. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard. The following were heard: Jim Grealish, 1326 Cope Avenue Resident at 1332 Cope Avenue Roger Franz, 1282 Cope Avenue h. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. i. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 12 - 217 WHEREAS, Marcor Properties, Inc., initiated a conditional use permit to construct a retail convenience store at the following- described property: W,398' of So. 1/2 of N.W. 1/4 of S.W. 1/4 (subj. to Hwy. & roads) in Sec. 10, Twp. 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Mn. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on December 5, 1988. The Planning Commis- sion recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on December 22, 1988. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also con- sidered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Plan- ning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEW60D CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. - 5 - 12/22 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri- mental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run —off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area proper- ties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated September 13, 1988, unless a change is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board. 2. Gas sales shall be limited to two dispensers on one island. There shall be no vehicle repair or maintenance. 3. No drive— through restaurants shall be allowed. Restaurants, where there are no drive —up windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles, shall be allowed subject to com- plying with parking requirements. 4. There shall be no outside storage or sales, except fuel. All discarded materials must be kept in proper waste containers and screened within enclosures. Enclosures shall be constantly maintained. 5. External speakers shall be directed away from the dwelling units and they shall not exceed fifty decibels (normal conver- sation level) at the residential property line. 6. Deliveries and trash pickup shall only be allowed between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. — 6 — 12/22 7. The store hours shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. 8. A $5,000.00 performance bond shall be posted to guarantee that the grading and excavation will be completed. 9. C.D.R.B. approval of the revised landscaping plan. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Rossbach Nays - Mayor Greavu and Councilmember Juker. 2. 7:10 P.M., Home Occupation License: 1236 Farrell Street (Richardson) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Kim Richardson for approval of a home occupation license to make and sell wedding accessories and heirloom clothing for children in her home. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Associate Planner Johnson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Mrs. Kim Richardson, the applicant, states she agrees with the conditions in the Staff report. e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu her to is subiect to: 1. Compliance with the home occupation licensing requirements listed in Sections 17 -21 and 17 -22 of City code. 2. No customers shall be permitted in the lower level of the home due to the lack of a direct outside exit. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. 7:30 P.M., Southlawn Drive and Radatz Avenue (Brandt) a. Rezoning b. Plan Amendment and Rezoning 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Jon Brandt for a plan amendment from RL (residential low density) to RM residential medium density and rezoning from F (farm) to R -2 small lot single and double dwelling for the south part of the site and a rezoning from F -farm to R -2 double dwelling and R -3 multiple dwelling for the northerly part of the site. - 7 - 12/22 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Associate Planner Johnson presented the specifics of the proposal 4. Mr. Jon Brandt, the developer, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 5. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following voiced their opinions: Mr. Herman Johnson, 2799 Southlawn Drive 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 12 - 218 WHEREAS, Jon Brandt initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RL, residential low density to RM, resi- dentially medium density for the property west of Southlawn Drive and south of Radatz Avenue extended. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 7, 1988, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an oppor- tunity to be heard and present written'statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on November 28 and December 22, 1988. The Council con- sidered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 8. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -12 -219 WHEREAS, Jon Brandt initiated the following rezonings all in section 3, township 29, range 22: 1. F, farm residence to R -1, single - dwelling: The south 121 feet of the north 812 feet of the east 158 feet of the southeast 1/4; - 8 - 12/22 2. F, farm residence to R -2, double dwelling: The south 121 feet of the north 636 feet of the east 158 feet of the southeast 1/4; 3. F, farm residence to R -3C, townhouse: The south 247 feet of the north 636 feet of the east 318 feet of the southeast 1/4, except the south 121 feet of the north 812 feet of the east 158 feet and the south 121 feet of the north 636 feet of the east 158 feet of the southeast 1/4; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 7, 1988. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on November 28 and December 22, 1988, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or. detract from the use of neighboring property of from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes — all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Colored Land Use and Zoning Maps. a. Manager McGuire stated the Council had requested Staff determine the feasibility and costs for converting the City's Land Use and zoning maps to color prints. - 9 - 12/22 In order to provide a range of choices, Staff investigated four different methods for creating color maps. Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts are for 100 copies of each map. 1. Use of colored plastic adhesive for each zone. Estimated cost per map: $175 -$200. 2. Litho processing, (5 and 7 colors). Estimated cost: $2,996. 3. Silk Screen Printing, (6 and 9 colors). Estimated cost: $3,500. 4. Offset printing, (6 and 9 color). Estimated cost: $5,765. This alternative would reduce map to 21 -inch by 31 -inch and was used by Eagan and Woodbury. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to table this item for further information. Seconded by Councilmember Joker. Ayes — all. 2. Appoint Sergeant for Patrol Divisions a. Manager McGuire stated on June 30, 1987, a sergeant vacancy was created because of retirement. A request is being made to fill the vacancy at this time. b. Director of Public Safety Collins explained the necessity of replacing this position. The present civil service list is still in effect. c. Councilmember Anderson moved to authorize Staff to proceed to fill the sergeant's position. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes — all J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATION 1. County Road C Water a. Councilmember Anderson stated he had received calls from residents on County Road C that are experiencing water problems. He asked when water is proposed for that area. b. Staff stated they anticipated 1989 Construction. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Administrative Storm Sewer Financing Discussion a. Mayor Greavu moved to table this item until there is more time to discuss this item. Seconded by Councilmemebr Anderson. Ayes — all. _10- 12/22 ADJOURNMENT 9:25 P.M. City Clerk - 11 - 12/22 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 6:00 P.M., Thursday, January 5, 1989 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 89 -1 A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 6:10 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Joker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present C. PUBLIC HEARING (Continued from December 12, 1988) 1. BBY Partnership - Gervais Avenue a. Plan Amendment b. Conditional Use Permit 1. Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the BBY Partnership proposal. 2. Manager McGuire stated the developer, BBY Partnership, had requested this item be tabled to a future meeting. 3. Mayor Greavu moved to table the Public Hearing for BBY Par] Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. D. ADJOURNMENT 6:11 P.M. City Clerk MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 6:00 P.M., Thursday, March 2, 1989 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 89 -6 A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 6:04 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Sale of Old City Hall 2. Meeting Date Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes — all D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. 6:00 P.M., Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit: Gervais Avenue (BBY Partnership) — Sec. 10 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of BBY Partnership for a plan amendment and a conditional use permit to construct a 426 unit apartment complex on Gervais Avenue west of White Bear Avenue. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. City Attorney Bannigan explained the procedures of the continued public hearing. d. Director of Community Development Olson presented specifics and past history of this proposal. e. Linda Fisher, attorney representing the developer, BBY Partnership, Inc., submitted pictures regarding the development and also gave in detail the specifics of the proposal. f. David Graske, Barton — Aschman Associates, also spoke on behalf of the proposal. g. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: 3/2 Bill Burns, 2527 Bittersweet Lane, presented a petition signed by 400 area residents opposing the proposal. He also submitted a letter from Peter Rizzo regarding how this development would lower value of the neighborhood homes. Joseph Zappa, 2522 Flandrau Peter Bryant, 1576 Gervais Judy Burns, 2527 Bittersweet Lane Jim Downing, 2542 Bittersweet Lane Mr. Schwarz, 1770 Gervais John Kavanagh, 758 E. 4th Street, St. Paul Jim Roundhouse, 2526 Bittersweet Lane Dick Anfang, representing the Builders' Trade stated BBY does not use union workers, does inadequate and inferior work. Steve Klinoski, State Wide Carpenter's Association, expressed his views Resident at 2508 Barclay h. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. i. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Plan Amendment for LSC to RH for the BBY Partnership. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - None Nays - all. E. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION 1. Sale of City Hall a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. He also stated City Code requires all commercial buildings that are vacant 30 days must comply with building code. b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to refer Section 9.41 of the Municipal Code to Staff for possible revision. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. c. Mayor Greavu moved to authorize the Manager to negotiate for sale of the old Citv Hall in Pxra.cc of .tiii nnn Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. - 2 - 3/2 0 a 2. Meeting Dates a. Manager McGuire stated March 9, 1989 T.K.D.A. would be meeting with Council at 4:00 P.M., March 9, 1989, to discuss the plans for the new City Hall Addition and after that meeting, the balance of the February 27, 1989, Agenda will be continued. F. ADJOURNMENT 9:26 P.M. City Clerk - 3 - 3/2 T0: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE. May 1, 1989 AGENDA REPORT Agenda Number E -1 :Action by Council ao A Endorser Modified......... Rej ecte d,� Date. It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 436,813.66 Checks #6272 - #6383 Dated 04 -01 -89 thru 04 -27 -89 $ 48,284.48 Checks #7147 - #7249 Dated 05 -04 -89 $ 485,098.14 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL. $ 171,046.66 $ 31,843.45 $ 202,890.11 $ 687,988.25 Payroll Checks Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. DFF: kaz VOUCHREG CHECK AMOUNT CITY OF- MAPLEWOOD 0.4/ZSJ8 9 11:09 21,534.30 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 5.00 FOR PERIOD 04 1.22 2.00 15.98 VOUCHER! 4.68 33.34 10,917.75 10,917.75 CHECK VENDOR CHf: CK VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION 6272 722200 04/01/89 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERA DED PAYALE. 154.00 9, 183.31 1Z9OZZ.61 PERA CONTRIBUTIONS 6273 030400 04/01/89 ANDERSON, CAROLE SUPPLIES OFFICE 205 .00 183-8Z 252.33 TRAVEL. & TRAIN 54.41 8.00 . PROGRAM SUPPLIES 102.51 147 .4: SUPPLIES OFFICE 125.66 10.14 SUPPLIES OFFICE 11071.80 1,350.20 12.16 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6.60 6.31 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6274 541400 04/01/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 6276 320600 04/01/89 GLADSTONE FIRE DEPT. FEES FOR SERVICE _ _ FEES FOR . SERV I_CE . 6277 701100 04/01/89 PARKSIDE FIRE DEPT. FEES FOR SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 6278 230500 04/01/89 EAST COUNTY LINE FIRE DEPT. FEES FOR SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 627+ 541400 04/01/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES 6250 190400 04/01/89 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSE S DNR LIC FEES PAY - _ 6.3.3.4 - 72��0.0 _ 04! 14lCf.� F'UBL LC EMPLOYEE PERA DEDUCTION PERA CONTRIBUTION 6335 720600 04/14/89 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 6336 842200 04/14/89 STAPLES, PAULINE SUPPPLIES OFFICE 63:37 144700 04/14/89 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE c;3S'u 630050 04/14/89 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES 6339 630050 04/14/89 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES PAGE 1 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 9,324.52 129Z09.78 21,534.30 .50 5.00 3.96 1.22 2.00 15.98 4.68 33.34 10,917.75 10,917.75 69240.00 697578.50 _ 7.59818.50 41237.00 47,:: =43.75 51,480.75 55460.00 609 877,00 __ .._. - . . 66, 337.00 671.50 671.50 154.00 154.00 9, 183.31 1Z9OZZ.61 219205.92 31000.00 31000.00. 3:3.07 33.07 209.00 205 .00 183-8Z 252.33 54.41 8.00 . 172.2:3 102.51 147 .4: 125.66 10.14 .1.5. Z's _ 11071.80 1,350.20 12.16 6.60 6.31 6.60 VOUCHRE G CITY OF MAC' LEWOOD PAGE 2 04/28/89 11:09. VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 04 VOUCHER! CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT UTILITIES 94.73 UTILITIES 2:3.45 UTILITIES 100.67 UTILITIES 218.40 UTILITIES 6.31 UTILITIES 6.31 UTILITIES 74.56 UTILITIES 428.83 .- UTILITIE:: - UTILITIES 18.06 21973.27 .6540 630050 04/14/8; N.S.P. UTILITIES 314.88 UTILITIES 10.8; UTILITIES 2.75 UTILITIES _. _.._ _ Z.75 UTILITIES 2.75 UTILII"IE:S 2.75 UTILITIE: .2.75 UTILITIES 112.75 UTILITIES 125.99 ..UTILITIES _ .. _._. 07.04 UTILITIES 109.14 UTILITIES 93.14 _ UTILITIES 77.x:+ UTILITIES 118.74 UTILITIES 110.46 UTILITIES 7 8 . -4 u _ _ UTILITIES 51.55 UTILITIES 146.43 UTILITIES 155.7 UTILITIES 158.74 UTILITIES 15:3.00 UTILITIES _- ,a.1.0 _ 8,405 -.;3 6341 541400 04/14/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC 51985.90 59985.90 6342 5414.00 04/14/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC. 19004.00 1 1 004 .00 6140_ 510900. 0.4/ 17/8'x+ MAPLE-WOOD STATE DANK F . I . C. A. PDL. _ 79126.Z5 FED INCOME:' 19,x:51 . 70 FICA CONTR I BUT ION 711Z6.25 33,504.20 6344 541970 04/17/89 MINNESOTA COMM OF REVENUE STATE. INCOMf: 75638.20 79638.20 6845 5.41400 04.I17IS? MINN. STATE C kEA: .U:tER M_u'f:OR VEH LIC. 10,638.00 10,638.00 go 6346 541400 04/17/89 MINN. STATE. TREASURE"---R SPATE: DRIVERS LIC. 757.50 757 .50 6347 541400 04/18/89 MINN. S TATE TREASURER moT0R VEH LIC T=EE'S 12,992.34 1 2 9 992 .:34 6348 5414.00 04./18/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE:. DRIV LIC FEES 855.00 PAGE 3 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 31865.07 VOUCHREG 60.00 60.00 ' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 7,365 .00 04/28/89 11:09 631.50 voucHl';".R./CHEC-K REGISTER 350.00 850.04 125.00 IZ5.00 FOR PERIOD 04 418.00 418.00 , 557.65 557.65 144.00 144.00 312.00 VOUCHER! 32.71 38-99 35.14 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM 18.85 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION 56.90 6349 810005 04/19/89 SHAFER CONTRACTING CO., INC. AWARDED CONST CONTR 86.25-- 8, 538.75 6,686.74 69686.74 737.50 737.50 270.00 6350 720600 04/19/89 POSTMASTER POSTAGE ON 6351 510100 04119/89 MAPLE LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN. FEES FOR SERVICE 6352 541400 04/19/89 MINN. STATE *TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES , 4+; 6353 541400 .04119/89 MINN.. STATE TREASURER._ STATE DRIV LIC FEES 6:354 140400 04/20/89 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIVERS LIC. 6355 520500 04/20/89 MCGUIRE, MICHAEL VEHICLE ALLOWANCE: .w 6356. 030910 04/.20/89. APCO FCC LIC. RENEWAL f' 6357 541400 44/20/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC 6358 541400 04/20/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC. 6359 911300 .04/21/89. VIETOR, LORRAINE WAGE DEDUCTION 6360 722200 0.4/21/89 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE LIFE INSURANCE 6361 144700 04/21/89 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LI CE:NF-E: PBL.. 6:362 141300 04/21/89 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL FUEL OIL 6363 530500 04/21/89 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM ISSN S.A.C. PAYABLE S.A.C. RETAINER 6364 541400 04/21/8" MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC: PBL. 6365 541400 04/21/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE: DRIVERS LIC. 6 366 310850 04/24/89 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE TRAVEL & TRAIN 6367 661750 04./24/89 NORTHERN STATES POWER UT11. 13:0 FROST UTIL 220 ODAY UTIL 2-:501 LONDIN 0 UTIL .x.:621 LINWOOD UTIL 98 LARPE_NIE:UR PAGE 3 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 31865.07 3, 86!5.07 60.00 60.00 ' 225.00 225.00 7,365 .00 71365.00 631.50 631.50 145.00 145.00 350.00 850.04 125.00 IZ5.00 79565.45 7,565.45 418.00 418.00 , 557.65 557.65 144.00 144.00 312.00 312.00 32.71 38-99 35.14 3.80 61.58 18.85 50.87 5 • r 2 1 56.90 47.14 351.90 89625.00 86.25-- 8, 538.75 6,686.74 69686.74 737.50 737.50 270.00 :'70.00 318.57 2.75 3.90 Z.75 65.47 VOUC:HREG CITY OF MAPLEWO OD PAGE 4 0-4/28,/89 11 :09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 04 .VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER BATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT � UTIL 2725 AFTON 150.20 UTIL 2258 CONWAY 96.ZZ UTIL 1830 CTY RD B - 536.7 UTIL 6:3 STERLING 6.27 UTIL 34.96 � UTIL 1081 MARNIE 6.60 UTIL 1685 GERVAIS 78.84 UTIL 2019BEAM 12.94 _._ UTIL Z287 MALLAND 11212.49 UTIL 700 STERLING 70 .76 UTIL 1985 ARCADE 147.94 29747.42 � 6368 541400 04/24/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 81486.75 .89-486.75 541.4,00 _ . _ 0412.4189_ MLXN_. _ S.TATE . TREA.S.URE'R.. _ STATE DRIV- LIB FEES 675.00 6370 720600 04/25/89 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 11300.00 1 , : 00.00 � 6371 541400 04/25/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES 451.50 451.50 -._._ : 372_ ._54.14Q0__.__.. 041Z5/89 MINN, STATE.. T_REASU.RER .MOTOR VEH LIC_ PEES 916:31-84 + 6373 510850 04/26/89 MAPL_E:WOOD- DOMESTIC INTERVENTI O DUE~. TO OTHER GOVERN 79494.41 71494.41 � 6374 410450 04/26/89 KEMPEIR AND ASSOCIATES OUTSIDE ENG FEES 496Z3.72 49523.72 _ 375 _5ao.500 04/2.6/89 ME..TR..O... -WA S..TE...C- ONTROL_ CO.M.I.S.SN._. DUE TO OTHER GOV _ 208.,,6.4. _ SEWER MA I NT CHGS .36 Z09.00 6376 .862300. 04/26/89 THEMME^S, JOAN LAND EASEMENTS 575.00 575.00 6377 541400 04/26/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC: FEES 595.50 595.50 6378 541400 04126/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L.IC FEES 99317.30 9,317.30 6379 140400 04/Z7/89 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIVERS LIC,. 115.50 118.50 6380 541400 04/27/89 MINN. STATE. TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC 139 483 .2 5 13, 483.25 � 6381 541400 04/27/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC.. 425.00 425.00 _i 6384 660900 04./27/=9 NO. ST.PAUL--MAPLEWOOD ROTARY MEMBERSHIP 85.00 85.00 6383 541440 04/27/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER S,TAX ;SURCHARGE PBL. 19148.15 � SURTAX RETAINER 22.96 W�1112-5.19 . 7147 030400 05/04/89 ANDERSON, CAROLE VE.HIC:LE ALLOWANCE 5.62 TRAVEL. ; TRAIN 9.00 14.62 7148 040 900 05/04/89 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE;. REPAIR t4 MA IhiT/V 305.7Z REPAIR MAINT /V 276.70 582.42 VOUC:HREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 � t". 4I28f87 11.:09 UCUC:HER /CHECK .REGISTEFc FOR PERIOD 04 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK CK VENDOR ITEM ITE.1M CHECK f NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 7149 042050 05/04/89 A. S . I . S . SUBS MEMBERSHIP 15.00 15.00 i 7150 060922 05/04189 BALDER, L.ORR I REC REG FEES 24.00 24.00 M 7151 061000 05/04/89 BANIGK, JOHN CANINE RETAINER 35.00 35.00 � 7152 061900 05/04/89 BATTERY TIRE WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 15.60 i SUPPLIES VEHICLE 58.47 74.07 7153 080900 05/04/89 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OTHER CONTT COSTS 29066.70 OTHER COSST COSTS 902.00 OTHER CONST COSTS _ 8, 101 .50 __ _. _.11, 074.20 _ 7154 081 150 05/04/89 BOH[_ , JOHN CANINE. RETAINER 35.00 35.00 � 7155 081400 05/04/89 BOYUM EQUIPMENT, INC. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 167.67 167.67 !MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 2B.U7 __ __..__ 28,0 ? -_ _ 7157 101650 05/04/89 BURFEIND, MARY P. FEES FOR SERVICE 105.42 105.42 7158 1019+00 05/04/8" BUSINESS RECORDS CORP, MN SUPPLIES OFFICE 97.73 97.73 7159 1015�5Q.__.. _ .__05./.04/8- 9__... BYERLY.�.....__.._ . -. _..__...__ ._ _ __. _. _. S __ PROGRAMS SUPPLIES _. _ - 31...87 -._ 7160 110150 05/0-4/89 C. C. SHARROW CO., INC. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 27.56 27.56 7161 110275 05/04/89 CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP COMPANY SUPPLIES OFFICE 22.00 SUPPLIES OFFICE:: 6.67 _ - ..SUPPLIES OFFICE _ _6.67 SUPPLIES OFFICE 3.33 SUPPLIES OFFICE 3.33 42.00 � 7162 122300 05/04/89 CAROLINA BIOLOGICAL PROGRAM SUPPLIES 24.89 24.89 I - � 7163 1.40.21.0 05/04/89 CLEAN- MATIC_ __. -_ - -. __ _ __ SUPPLIES JANITORIAL 200 -.00. _ ._ .... 200.00 I 7164 140500 05/04/89 CLUTCH & U JOINT SUPPLIES VEHICLE 142.92 142.92 � 7165 142450 05/04/89 CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS CONTRACT PYM. 11495.00 1 , 495 .00 ,- 7166 1449+00 05/04/89 DEPT. OF PUBLIC ._SAFETY _ OUTSIDE RENT EQUIP 150.00 ! OUTSIDE RENT EQUIP 450.00 600.00 7167 150200 05/04/89 COLLINS, KENNETH V. FEES FOR SERVICE:: 27.50 27.50 ! 7168 152400 05/04/89 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. E QUI PMENT OFFICE 20.41 20.41 � 7169 � 180100 05/04/89 DAYTONS BLUFF SHEET (METAL. SUPPLIES JANITORIAL 26.40 26.40 1 7170 180800 05/04/89 DALCO SUPPLIES JANITOR 60.20 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPL..E:WOOD PAGE 6 � 04/28/89 11:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 04 ..VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM I TE.M CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT I SUPPLIES JANITOR 190.14 SUPPLIES JANITOR 100.69 353.03 7171 184100 05/04/89 DATA DISPATCH DELIVERY SERVICE 25.00 25.00 7172 210.900 05/04/89 DROVER'S SUPPLY COMPANY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 12.4Z 1G.42 7175 230500 05/04/89 EAST COUNTY LINE FIRE DEPT. FUEL OIL 57.31 57.31 � 7174 230700 05/04/89 EAST SIDE G.T.C. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 38.10 38.10 " 7175 Z6.04 -00 _ 05/04/89 FAUST ..DANIEL TRAVEL & TRAIN 9,00 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 80.68 89.68 .7.1.7- 6..._. X704-7.5._ ........ _ 051,04 18 VALLEY.. MAINT_MATERILA. _ _ _ 165..2.2_. _- _._..__. _._.._ 165.22._ 7177 310300 05/04/89 GOODYEAR TIRE COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT /V 7.75 REPAIR & MAINS" /V .19.00 REPAIR & MAINT /V 20.00 REPAIR & MAINT/V 150.21 REP.ATR MATNTIV _ _... .__.17_.,0.0... .._ _. __.,.._.- ..__.. ..._ .. _. --- - -- REPAIR MAINT /V 111.73 3:5.76 i 7173 310515 05/04/89 GOPHER ELECTRONICS CO. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 64.16. 64.1c 71.79 310715 05/04/89 GOPHER STATE --ONE CALL, INC. FEES FOR SERVICE 103.72 103.72 � 7180 320525 05/04/89 GREW- HAYMAN, JANET MILEAGE 35.57 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 10.6'&Z SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 2.38 POSTAGE 87.50 PUBLISHING 33.50 169.57 7181 3ZO683 05/04/89 GLADSTONE HOUSE PROGRAM SUPPLIES 117.1: PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6 .63- 110 .50 7152 350700 05/04/89 HIRSHFIELDS SUPPLIES 31.47 31.47 7183 _ - 35.0.880 0.5-104/89 HOI.SINGTON GRO,U.P, IN.C. _ PLAN.NING DEPOSITS PE.L. 1, 7.26..7 -0 1,1726. 7 0 7134 370075 05/04/89 HUDSON MAP COMPANY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 39.45 39.45 7185 380750 05/04/89 IDEA BANK 9 THE BOOKS 16Z.70 162-70 718,6 .400400 05/04/89 J.J. TROPHIES _ PROGRAM SUPPLIES 2.00 7187 400815 05/04/89 JANEZ TOOL CO. MAINT MATI.:RIAL 199.50 199.50 � 7138 401Z00 05/04/89 JIM HATCH SALES MAINT MATERIAL 192.9: 192.92 Al 7.189 401 800 05/04/89 JOLLY' N INC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3.38 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 04/ZS/8 9 11:09 VOUCHERJCHECK REGIS'iER FOR PERIOD 04 VOUCHER/ CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION 7190 402500 05/04/89 JUKER, FRAN TRAVEL & TRAIN 7.92 19.39 � VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 7191 420365 05/04/89 KLOSE =OWSK19PHILIP ELEC PERMIT REFUND 219.33 219.33 SURTAX, REFUND 7192 430300 05/04/89 KNOWLAN'S PROGRAM SUPPLIES 150.00 505.00 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 7193 430400 05/04/89 KNOB: COMMERCIAL CREDIT SUPPLIES OFFICE � 73.45 SUPPLIES OFFICE 7194 450200 05/04/89 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES, IN FEES FOR SERVICE 7195 460103 05/04/89 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES TRAVEL & TRAIN 293.72 1,468.60 :. TRAVEL TRAILING 56.88 TRAVEL. TRAINING; 7196 461200 05/04/89 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES OFFICE 42.66 � SUPPLIES OFFICE: .54 811.26 SUPPLIES OFFICE 16.98 SUPPLIES OFFICE 44.64 SUPPLIES OFFICE 311.62 60.00 60.00 SUPPLIES OFFICE 91.06 SUPPLIES OFFICE 567.62 658.68 SUPPLIES OFFICE 7197 470700 05/04/89 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLISHING 52.20 52.20 250 .87 LEGAL. FISCAL . LEGAL FISCAL 65.17 LEGAL FISCAL. LEGAL FISCAL LEGAL FISCAL LEGAL FISCAL 7198 500500 05/04/89 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES VEHICLE SUPPLIES VEHICLE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 7199 510900 05/04/89 MAPLEWOOD STATE. DANK FEES FOR SERVICE:: 7200 5Z1150 05/04/89 MEMOREX: TELEX: CORPORATION REPAIR MA INT TELEPHONE 7201 530800 05/04/89 METRO INSPECTION SERVICE CONTRACT PYM. 720'x: 540350 05/04/89 MIDWEST SIREN SERVICE REPAIR & MAINT /E: 7203 540705 05/04/89 M I NAR FORD REPAIR MA I NT VEHICLE 7204 600210 05 /04/89 M. T. I . DI STRIB'UTING CO. SUPPLIES VEHICLE PAGE 7 I TE M CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 12:.00 10.50 22.50 ►2.00 .50 62.50 � 11.47 7.92 19.39 � 24.83 1.41- 23.42 219.33 219.33 55.00 300.00 150.00 505.00 117.48 29.37 � 73.45 234.'7 146.86 / 352.46 293.72 1,468.60 :. 5.4.74 56.88 .35.55 35 .55 42.66 � 21.34 .54 811.26 16.98 44.64 250.00 311.62 60.00 60.00 91.06 _ 567.62 658.68 31020 .80 39 020.80 52.20 52.20 250 .87 250 .87 . 65.17 65.17 V %lUCHhEG C i`CY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 8 � 04/28/89 11:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER 1 FOR PERIOD 04 ! `_. _VOUCHER/ x CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER- DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT � 7:05 610800 05/04/89 MUSEUM PRODUCTS PROGRAM SUPPLIE:.S 61.74 61.74 � 1 7.20,E 630200.. _ 05/.04/89 NADEAU, EDWARD- SAFETY SHOES 20.00 20.00 7207 630210 05/04/89 NAPA AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES VEHICLE 6.08 � SUPPLIES VEHICLE 10.68 16.76 1 7208 630800 05/04/89 NCR REPAIR MAINT EQUIPMENT 16.50 ! REPAIR MAINT EQUIPME.NT 16m50 REPAIR MAINT EQUIPMENT 16.50 REPAIR MAINT EQUIPMENT 16.50 � _ REPAIR MAINT EQUIPMENT 16.50 .REPAIR MAINT EQUIPMENT 16..50 REPAIR MAINT EQiJIPMENT 16.50 _.._ ..._.._...._ .. _...._ ...._ .... ..._.... _. __... _ -.._ _ __ _._ _.. __. _ _ _....... REPAIR MAINT EQULPMENT . _ _ ,0.0 _ 1 7209 640500 05/04/89 NELSON, CAROL M. TRAVEL 'TRAIN 18.47 15.47 7210 660250 05/04/8' NO. STAR CHAPTER OF I . C. B.O. SUBS & MEMBERS 45.00 45.00 1 05/04/29 _NORTH ST. F'AIJL...CIT.Y ijJF'_. _._. _ _. _ . UTILITIES.. 1, 19,6,.462....._ _ _._..... _.._. i,.1.��.62, _ 1 7312 6609+00 05/04/89+ NO.ST.PAUL- MAPLEWOOD ROTARY TRAVEL &, TRAIN 20.50 30.50 ! 7213 670500 05/04/89 NUTESON, LAVERNE TRAVEL TRAINING 16.18 16.18 4 7Z1 680.4.5.0... -_. 0- 51- 04189. . _ ODEGARD,_- .R0B.ERT.__. _ _ TRAVEL & _ TRAIN ...129.80 7215 680600 05/04/89 OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR & MAINT /V 190.03 ! REPAIR & MAINT /V 122..60 REPAIR & MAINT /V 12.2 REPAIR & MAINT /V 12.26 REPA. I R & MAINT / V 6.013 1 REPAIR & MAINT /V 6.13. 3451.41 7Z16 701200 05/04/89 PARTY .PLACE:. SUPPLIES OFFICE .4.9.8 p 4.98 1 7217 701500 05/04/89+ PAYE~.TTE, JEAN FEES FOR SERVICE 105.42 105.42 4 7218 1 710100 05/04/89 PEAT MARWICK MAIN CONTRACT PYM. 675.00 075.00 � 7219 711.500 05/04/89 PHOTOS TO GO SUPPLIES OFFICE 6.81 6.81 72ZO 711600 05/04/89+ PINK COMPANIES FREIGHT CHARGES 17.28 17.28 ! 7ZZ 1 740400 05/04/89 R. J . K. PRI NTI NG PUh-L. ISHING 123.50 123.50 7222 740900 05/04/89 RADIO SHACK SUPPLIES OFFICE 5.49 5.49 7Z23 741300 05/04/89 RAMSE:.Y CLINIC FEES FOR SERVICE 135.00 ! FEES FOR SERVICE 46. 00. 181.00 VOUCHREG . CITY OF MAPLE WOOD. PAGE 9 04/28/89 11:09 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR-PERIOD 04 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITE:.M ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 7224 741500 05/04/89 RAMSE:Y COUNTY PART; RE C PROGRAM EXPENSE 30.0 0 30.00 7225 741560 05/04/89 RAMSEY COUNTY FEES FOR SERVICE 10.00 10.00 7:26 750800 05/04/89 REMI NGTON ELECTRIC REPAIR MA INI B 36.00 36.00 7227 761200 05/04/89 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR & MA INT /E 243.05 REPAIR & MAINT /E 166.80 REPAIR & MA I NT /E 19.25 429.10 7228 762300 05/04/89 ROYAL DOWNS FEES FOR SERVICE 18.00 18.00 7229 780175 05/04/84 E.E.H. OUTSIDE ENG FEES 159.56 159.56 7230 780300 05/04/89 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE 41.66 41.6c� 7231 780400 05/04/89 S &D LOCH: & SAFE SUPPLIES OFFICE 2.20 2.20 7232 810800 05/04/89 SIGN CENTER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 19.26 19.26 7233 831600. , 05/04189 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT OFFICE ;85.00 SUPPLIES OFFICE 14'2.25 EQUIPMENT OFFICE 557.00 SUPP'LI E S .OFFICE. 72.00 SUPPLIES OFFICE 90.00 SUPPLIES OFFICE 12.60 SUPPLIES OFFICE 3.80 SUPPLIES OFFICE 89.84 SUPPLIES OFFICE 3.40 - SUPPLIES OFFICE_ 37.10 SUPPLIES OFFICE 7.08 SUPPLIES OFFICE 7.08 SUPPLIES OFFICE 54.30 SUPPLIES OFFICE 71.89 SUPPLIES OFFICE 47.49 17474.03 7234 843200 05/04/89 STEFFEN, SCOTT CANINE RETAINER 35.00 35.00 72:35 850600 05/04/89 SUPERAMERICA SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 48.24 FUEL & OIL 103.46 151.70 7236 851 210 05/04/89 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, I NC . SUPPLIES OFFICE 10.80 10.80 7237 860250 05/04/89 T. C. P. A . SUBS & MEMBERS 50 .00 50.00 7238 860650 05/04/89 TARGET STORES SUPPLIES OFFICE 90.66 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 18.75 SUPPLIES OFFICE 38.53 SUPPLIES OFFICE 17.69 SUPPLIES JANITORIAL 33.97 SUPPLIES OFFICE 7.99 1J�aUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 10 04/8189 11:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 04 VOUCHER /_ _. ' CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT PROGRAM SUPPLIES 25.98 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 34.99 ✓ PROGRAM SUPPLIES 19-.99- 288,55 _. 7239 862100 05/04/89 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHE.V . VEHICLES 10, 998.00 109998.00 7Z40 871200 05/04/89 TOLL COMPANY MAINTENANCE. MATERIAL Z4.27 24-27 _ 724.1.- 890600 05104/89 U.H.L. INC. _ - _ SUPPLIES JANITOR . 17.40 17.40 7242 901550 05/04/89 U S WEST CELLULAR INC TELEPHONE: 40.88 TELEPHONE 16.64 56.47 7243 901555 05/04/89 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 1 , 56Z .96 . TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 50.92 TELEPHONE:: 50.92 TELEPHONE ;Z77.73-. TELEPHONE 11071.90 TELEPHONE.: 48.7Z _ _ - _ ____ __TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 48.72 TELEPHONE 48.7 , TELEPHONE 48.72 TELEPHONE 146.16 TELEPHONE 88.90 TELEPHONE _. . TELEPHONE 88.90 TELEPHONE 52 . 65 TELEPHONE 39.00 TELEPHONE 88.90 TELEPHONE 19.50 ...TELEPHONE _ . ___._.... _ 89.y05. _..._ ... TELEPHONE 111.90 TELEPHONE:: 81.80 _ TELEPHONE 50.94 TELEPHONE:: 19.57 TELEPHONE 47.89 TEL.EPHONE* __ _ . 109 .lab 7244 910000 05/04/89 VIDEOTRONIX, INC. REPAIR MAINT /B 188.00 188.00 7245 912100 05/04/89 VIRTUE PRINTING SUPPLIES OFFICE 16.25 .7246._ 9305.00 05/04/89 W. W. GRAIN.GER _ _ _ SUPPLIES JANLTOR _ __ . 89...016 _.__..._ _ . -89.06 - 7247 931100 05/04/89 WALDE:.NBOOKS BOOM 13.56 18.5 7:48 940700 05/04/89 WESCO MAINT MATERIAL 51.78 51.75 __ 7249 941850 05/04/89 WHITE BEAR SCREEN PRINTING SUPPLIES VEHICLE 230.00 ;230.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 04/21/89 CHECK #8281 - CHECK #8442 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY GREAVU, JOHN 477.58 ROSSBACH, GEORGE 399.42 BASTIAN, GARY 399.42 JOKER, FRANCES 399.42 ANDERSON, NORMAN 399.42 SLAVIK, THOMAS J. 11107.70 McGUIRE, MICHAEL A. 31306.46 BLACKSTONE, GAIL 11427.70 ZAWACKI, KATHRYN 11004.50 BERM, LOIS N. 11034.10 JAHN, DAVID J. 837.76 SWANSON, LYLE 11022.77 CUDE, LARRY J. 276.80 OSTER, ANDREA J. 902.28 MIKISKA, WILLIAM 172.80 FAUST, DANIEL F. 21033.30 TAYLOR, LINDA 11050.28 MATHEYS, ALANA K. 1,083.89 VIGNALO, DELORES A. 17083.88 ANDERSON, CAROLE J. 1,243.88 LA MOTTE, MARLENE 182.00 AURELIUS, LUCILLE E. 11878.90 SELVOG, BETTY D. 238.00 SCHADT, JOANNE L. 1,034.20 KELSEY, CONNIE L. 619.11 VIETOR, LORRAINE S. 11052.80 HENSLEY, PATRICIA A. 566.29 JAGOE, CAROL 736.01 CARLE, JEANETTE E. 949.57 OLSON, SANDRA 541.20 COLLINS, KENNETH V. 21084.50 RICHIE, CAROLE L. 954.28 SVENDSEN, JOANNE M. 11212.14 NELSON, ROBERT D. 1,800.50 FULLER, ELAINE 366.34 OMATH, JOY E. 972.68 MARTINSON, CAROL F. 945.25 ZAPPA, JOSEPH A. 1,561.48 STILL, VERNON T. 1,378.28 SKALMAN, DONALD W. 1,403.88 FRASER, JOHN 599.39 NELSON, CAROL M. 11538.98 MORELLI, RAYMOND J. 11355.20 STEFFEN, SCOTT L. 11410.13 ARNOLD, DAVID L. 11561.48 BANICK, JOHN J. 17488.39 BOHL, JOHN C. 11467.22 CAHANES, ANTHONY G. 11800.50 CLAUSON, DALE K. 11403.88 MOESCHTER, RICHARD M. 11507.44 ATCHISON, JOHN H. 11403.88 YOUNGREN, JOHN 11558.06 PELTIER, WILLIAM F. 11561.49 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 04/21/89 CHECK #8281 - CHECK #8442 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J. 11327.08 WELCHLIN, CABOT V. 11486.01 LANG, RICHARD J. 11265.80 RAZSKAZOFF, DALE 11454.28 HERBERT, MICHAEL J. 11454.29 DREGER, RICHARD C. 11748.97 STAFNE, GREGORY L. 11403.88 BECKER, RONALD D. 11454.28 HALWEG, KEVIN R. 11561.48 STOCKTON, DERRELL T. 11416.40 PAULOS, JR., PAUL G. 11450.50 BOWMAN, RICK A. 11467.75 KAKIS, FLINT D. 11390.28 HEINZ, STEPHEN J. 11415.88 GRAF, DAVID M. 11467.08 THOMALLA, DAVID J. 11565.45 PALMA, STEVEN T. 11226.28 VORWERK, ROBERT E. 1,467.08 BERGERON, JOSEPH A. 11428.73 MEEHAN, JAMES 11632.25 MELANDER, JON A. 11467.08 ENGEN, MARIA 503.93 SAUNDERS, SARAH 508.79 EMBERTSON, JAMES M. 17538.10 WILLIAMS, DUANE J. 1,454.44 RABINE, JANET L. 11043.63 STAHNKE, JULIE A. 11057.79 BOYER, SCOTT K. 11009.04 WALDT, CYNTHIA 804.68 RYAN, MICHAEL P. 21181.65 FEHR, JOSEPH 833.99 NELSON, KAREN A. 11058.30 FLAUGHER, JAYME L. 11067.88 WEGWERTH, JUDITH A. 553.93 HAIDER, KENNETH G. 21084.50 CHLEBECK, JUDY M. 11087.88 MEYER, GERALD W. 11501.32 KANE, MICHAEL R. 11391.75 NAGEL, BRYAN 997.20 LUTZ, DAVID P. 17527.98 KLAUSING, HENRY F. 11286.16 SCHMOOCK, JOHN 11165.39 HELEY, RONALD J. 11186.10 OSWALD, ERICK D. 11214.86 FREBERG, RONALD L. 17221.59 CASS, WILLIAM C. 11704.68 LINDBLOM, RANDY 887.08 ELIAS, JAMES G. 11334.28 PECK, DENNIS L. 11334.28 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 11285.52 IRISH, BRUCE A. 11635.08 GESSELE, JAMES T. 11404.71 GEISSLER, WALTER M. 1,310.28 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 04/21/89 CHECK #8281 - CHECK #8442 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY METZ, TERRY 11327.52 LOFGREN, JOHN R. 942.40 ODEGARD, ROBERT D. 11878.90 BRENNER, LOIS J. 11126.65 KRUMMEL, BARBARA A. 486.34 STAPLES, PAULINE 11642.28 JONES, L. 72.00 TRAVERS, D. 207.00 ANDERSON, ROBERT S. 11100.68 LINDORFF, DENNIS P. 11146.63 GARRY, WILLIAM 818.28 HELEY, ROLAND B. 11175.88 MARUSKA, MARK A. 1,342.28 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 818.28 BURKE, MYLES R. 11197.48 SHELDON, LEO 71.25 DREGER, KARI 125.00 MCGIVERN, J.- 100.00 DAMIANI, R. 45.00 GRAF, M. 10.00 SINNIGER, S. 170.00 PODPESKAR, KIMBERLY J. 65.00 VAN WYK, K. 25.00 OLSON, C. 120.00 ANDERSON, C. 87.50 BESETH -JR, RONALD 80.00 NELSON, J. 100.00 FISCHER, PATRICIA 60.00 IKHAML, J. 10.00 WARD, ROY G. 406.40 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. 11372.68 GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M. 1,157.48 NELSON, JEAN 384.08 HORSNELL, JUDITH A. 567.94 HUTCHINSON, ANN E. 764.84 FISHER, L. 84.00 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M. 11029.48 BARTA, MARIE L. 936.69 OLSON, GEOFFREY W. 11878.91 MISKELL, NANCY 328.59 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L. 490.58 GENEROUS, ROBERT 333.20 ROBERTS, KENNETH 11010.28 EKSTRAND, THOMAS G. 11467.71 OSTROM, MARJORIE 11563.08 CARVER, NICHOLAS N. 11187.88 WENGER, ROBERT J. 11286.28 LACASSE, CASEY 162.75 NADEAU, EDWARD A. 11192.88 MULWEE, GEORGE W. 11152.68 NUTESON, LAVERNE S. 11536.68 BREHEIM, ROGER W. 11174.28 EDSON, DAVID B. 11185.07 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 04/21/89 CHECK #8281 - CHECK #8442 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY ------- - - - - -- GERMAIN, DAVE ----- - - - - -- 11174.28 MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 11288.68 SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 11053.48 $171,046.66 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION Z1 $ 71251.62 CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION Cl 23,692.00 AFSCME 2725 U1 483.83 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988 160.00 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC U3 18.00 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM Z2 238.00 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION I1 525.41 $ 31,843.45 GRAND TOTAL $202,890.11 ,�.otion lg CoUn8ir:# Emdorse(i.�,..., Modified Re J ectec MEMORANDUM Date TO: MICHAEL A. MCGUIRE, CITY MANAGER FROM: ROBERT D. ODEGARD, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATIO SUBJECT: DONATION TO NATURE CENTER DATE: MAY 1, 1989 The Maplewood -Oakdale Lions Club has contributed $300.00 to the Nature Center to help defray the costs involved with the 10th Year Celebration. A thank you letter has been sent acknowledging this request. It is requested that the City Council accept the donation of $300.00 and apply it to the Nature Center account 101 - 604 -41200 TO: . FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT TITLE: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Kenneth Roberts - Associate Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL 2228 Maplewood Drive Action by Council':i Hoffman Corner, Oil/Ron Urban Endorsed Citgo Fuel Station April 19, 1989 Modif ie ReJ ecterl SUMMAR . Y Date lot The applicant is requesting the renewal of the conditional use permit (CUP) needed to construct a fuel station canopy within 350 feet of a residential district. 2" The I etter from the appl icant on page 8 indicates that landscaping and fencing would be completed this. .spring s BACKGROUND Past Actions On March 22, 19BB, the Community Design Review Board conditionally approved the building, site and landscape plans'. See page 6. On April 11, 1988, the City Council granted the CUP subject to the +ol I owing conditions: Adherence to the site plan presented at the April 11, 1988 City Council meeting, unless a change is approved by the City-'s Community Design Review Board. A copy of this plan .shall be filed with the Community Development department. 28 The site shall be kept free of rubbl e junk junk cars and parts, and debrise Nonpaved areas shall be kept mowed and planted with grass, including boulevards. 3a There shal I be no I ight or g are onto the home to the east . 4a Any sound from exterior speakers shall not be audible at the easterly property line. 5. There shat I be no gas del iveries before 7 a.m. or after 10 puma 6. Construction of an eight- - foot- -high fence (in conformance with City Code requirements) along the east side of the site. 7. The hours of operation shall be from 6 A. I m. to 11 psms Code fie guirements Subsection 36-187 (b) of the City Code states that "no building or, exterior use, except parking, may be erectedg altered or co nducted within three hundred f if ty (350) feet of a, residential district without a conditional use permit.." Subsection 36-442 (e) requires that "all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the ,date of initi.al approval, unless such review is waived by Council decision or ordinance. At the one year review., the Council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five (5) years, for subsequent reviews." DISCUSSION The applicant has not completed the site improvements required on the approved site plan. The items to be completed are: enclosure of the garbage dumpster, parking area paving, striping of parking spaces, sodding and landscaping,) fencing along the east property line, the installation of stop and handicapped parking signs, and the installation of islands to control traffic. The applicant has agreed to complete all remaining required site work. within 60 days. To ensure that ' all of the conditions are met, a July 1,, 1989 completion deadline is suggested by Staff. RECOMMENDATION Renewal of the conditional use permit for a fuel station at 2228 Maplewood Drive is recommended for 60 days subject to the original conditions of approval. mb/krcitgo Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3w Approved Site Plan dated April 11, 1988 4a Community Design Review Board Conditions dated March 22, 1986 5a Letter from applicant dated March 13,, 1989 i • 0000 • • . IF s C L S L C s C m .�: .. i� • • • i its MML RM 1 2 R 1;;� /O • ® . .- .� . . r . IV os • ` 111- `��� is � •' •...._ � � � `���j ♦ • ' lot r • afar �� t= !► •t/ ! 11111 1Nil is '•tl.�� �. ui Co REVISED LOCATION MAP SHERWOOD GLEN NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 3 Attachment 1 Q N -1 co} * 40 I r , 01 A IV Totcd v 13.1.700 OF IJ A A wft WARNER HARDWARE and COUNTRYr.1 HP IiAj RKET lit ow 1 2218 071 ■ Ave 1-4 00 Aw - --- � r ,, M %_' COUNTY ROAD B - i --- -2 Q .1 tv __ ______ 4ii If �� ,� (3) (4-0) /ab Jp C-OU04 T v Cw R A me a v ,�o / �. $ GLAN T Y OF' R KELLER GOLF COURSE co u "'I It of mar Cv .ti PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 J 7 1174 fly I (4d 41" Is IL 41 141 4 Q oA 0 o• tot'v c oia J L E.x�s1�►�y fly G rNaIA, �tr r �f Exist. "POLO � he P E M &EAU& , • i 3 i ' - __I POL-7►EktY 1,106 3b�s c AILMw &s ' � i� l►A tJ D s i 00 its n� . � v�ESt1. s I iIuiLos AG Noll ft�V- � ' r ,- �-- F w• u►�� '�-� • E� - - - -- -- -- . 1 • � �E� boo oN �� tlti'ioyG Z24i` \1 1S�o►WD � t�t��sio�i REMa� E� +�t. �o�lE�► i' ' UW(4N"UWO SCFvkE 'To szPW4 . � r • Go_�,,'�� P��A V b SITE PLAN Attachment 3 5 I Community Design Review Board -6- M i nut es 3-22-88 F in Design Review C i t g o Canopy Addition 2228 Maplewood Drive Ron Urban was present representing Hoffman Corner Oil He said he was in agreement with the conditions of recommendation. r. Several neighbors of the applicant spok-e regarding the proposal Some of their concerns were additional drainage problems in the area, whether the station would be open 24- hours daily and, therefore, the loss of additional privacy. The neighbors also requested the applicant add fencing to screen their property, Board Member Deans moved approval of plans dated March 7, 19889 for the HCO Self-Service Station canopy addition at 2228 Maplewood Drive, subject to: in - Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does not constitute approval of a building permit, 2a Any Outdoor, dUMpsters shal I be stored in screening enclosures with a 1C)(-.)% opaque wooden gate and shal I be a color and material compatible with the building. Enclosures shall be protected by concrete-filled steel posts, or the equivalent .anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure If the encl 0SUre is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted 3a Any new exterior building or roof-top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. 4n Park ing areas shal I be striped and a] I park, ing and drive areas shall be bituminous. The area denoted as "additional park; ing spaces if needed" on the site plan shall be grass. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed if required by the city engineer for drainage control. 5a If construction has I not begun within two years of approval board review shal I be repeated. 6a Site security lighting shall be provided vided. Al 1 site I ight ing shal I be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 7a If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shal I be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 40 Be All required grassy areas shal 1 be continual 1y and 6 Attachment 4 COMMUnity Design Review Board -7-- M i n ut es 3-22-88 properly maintained. 94 The extension of the concrete island in the County Road B right-of-way is subject to the approval of Ramsey County. 10. The canopy must be set back at least ten feet from both right-of -way I ines, 11. Screening that meets the requirements of Section 36-27 (c) of city code shat I be provided along the east side of the site. The .purpose is to screen headlight glare from the residential windows to the east. 12. Reflectori.---ved stop signs and a handicap parking sign shall be provided, 13. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction shall be restored and resodded. 14. All tanks must be anchored, subject to the approval of the fire marshal. 15. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a f arm acceptabl e to staf f in the amount of 150% of the e %stimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. 16. Grading and drainage plans shall be Submitted and be subject to the city engineer's approval. Board Member Erickson seconded Ayes--al I VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS George Rossbach , 1406 E. Co. Rd. C, a member of the Map ewood City Council 7 commented on the Council 's actions regzArding Office Shores—Desoto Associates' project, VIII. BOARD PRESENTATIONS IX8 STAFF PRESENTATIONS Secretary Ek-p-strand asked for a board member to attend the city council meeting on March 28, 1988, as a representative for the review board. Board Member Erickson said he would attend if his schedule would allow. X4 ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:42 p.m. PETROLEUM PRODUCTS O CAR WASH O AUTO PARTS O HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING HOfFMAN CORNER HOF.FMAN CORNER 0 1L CO. OIL CO. 3595 Hoffman Road White. Bear. Lake, MN 55110 (612)484 -3323 March 13, 1989 City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Rd B Maplewood, MN. 55109 Attn : Tory Ekstrand Re: (CUP) Renewal Dear Tom; CITGOI W141" Please be advised as of this letter that I would like to renew our conditional use permit with the City of Maplewood. Because of our business at 2228 Hwy 61 & Co. Rd. B we still have landscaping and fencing to complete this spring. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely; 40 )aj Ron Urban HCO /Operations Manager RU/ sk 8 Attachment 5 AGENDA NUMBER C -of/ TO: Mayor and City Council Action bar Council, 1 FROM: City Manager �.�. -- -.�- -� Endorsed... Modifies -..... RE: PAY EQUITY /COMPARABLE WORTH Rejected Date DATE: April 28, 1989 INTRODUCTION To keep the City's Pay Equity Plan current, it is necessary that new positions be evaluated during the first year, and existing positions re- evaluated on a periodic basis. The Staff Services position has been tested, and others will be tested during 1989. BACKGROUND The City of Maplewood adopted it's Pay Equity Plan in early 1988, and implemented it over a two -year period (1988 - 1989). In order to maintain the plan's validity, approximately 25% of the total job classifications will be reexamined on a yearly basis, with new positions classified toward the end of the first year after the duties have been better defined DISCUSSION A Time Spent Profile (T.S.P.) was completed for the Staff Services position and a "benchmark" score was determined by surveying communities with similar positions. A survey was also conducted to establish the market. As the following numbers indicate, the recommended salary is less than the market or pay equity line but is a step in the right direction. The position should be re- evaluated in two more years to see where it is in relation to the other jobs in Maplewood. 1989 01/01/89 1989 PAY 05/15/89 05/15/90 05/15/91 ACTUAL MARKET EQUITY PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED $3033/M0. $3794/M0. $4018/M0. $3214/M0. $3408/M0. $3612/M0. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the recommended pay schedule for the Staff Services Coordinator effective May 15, 1989, with the understanding that it be re- evaluated in approximately two years. MAM : kaz Attachment Action by Council,6 Endorsed.....—,- Modif ied..,... ]Rejected...------- Date AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM. Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Gervais Avenue, Project 88-14--Additional Cost to Seal Unused Well Near Site DATE: May 1, 1989 A I arge diameter abandoned water we I was found about 200 feet north 0+ Gervais Avenue and the scrub and brush within the city's storm water pond ing area. This we'd I must be properly sealed by a I icensed wel I dril I er to avoid a potential hazard to pub ic .hea.Ith. Normally, this would routinely be handled administratively* However, due to the size of the well the cost 0 is estimated at $3,240 and council approval was thought to be warranted, It is proposed to be added to the costs of the Gervais project. The subsequent demolition of the block building will be done under a proposed change order by the Gervais Avenue contractor. ESA ic Johnson John S. Johnson_ cEo April 28 1988 Bros. Well Drilling 2750 NOEL DRIVE 5T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 City of Maplewood J830 E. Co, Rd. B RE: Sealing abandoned well on Gerva.i.s Ave, near English Bt. co. This is an old irrigation well of unknown depth and construction. It will be necessary cessary to pull out the pump and measure and inspect the well to give you an accurate cost estimate for abandonment, The Minnesota Health Dept, may require water tests before sealing g or it may be necessary to pull or perforate some casing. That can not be determined untill pump has been pulled out, This estimate is for pulling the pump and filling the well with cement, assuming a depth of 200 to 250 ft, Extra work required will be extra cost. After we pull the pump and check the well we can give you a more accurate cost estimate before sealing, Move equipment to site, backhoe, pump pulling equipment, cement pump, pipe etc, and set up, Telephone 4842859 Lump Sum 400,00 Remove concrete slab and clean up area, with backhoe $50.00 per hr, Estimate 4 hrs. 200,00 Pull pump $ 65.00 per hr. Estimate 8 hrs. 520.00 Pump cement $50,00 per hr, Estimate 8 hrs, 400,00 Cement extra at $8,00 per sack, Estimate 200,00 sacks, 1600.00 Gravel $12,00 per yd. If needed, Estimate 10 yds, 120,00 Estimated Cost 3240.00 Water testing and extra work and_ perihits if required will be extra cost, H SOFT BROS , L DRILLING CO . • Prices good for 45 days pre dent MEMORANDUM TO:. City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Planning Commission Survey DATE: April 11., 1989 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endorsed--.... Modified Rejected. Date The City Counci.1 should decide whether they. want to take any a-ction on the Planning Commission Survey discussed at the April 6th meeting. BACKGROUND The City Council previously declared Al Goin's position on the Planning Commission to be vacant, but did not authorize staff to fill the vacancy. Council requested a survey of other planning commissions, which was reviewed at the April 6th meeting. See attached survey.) The survey showed that planning commissions var ied in s ize from f ive to- ten members. The majority, 17 of 26 cities., have seven member commissions. Since the Council last reviewed this survey, Commissioner Dempsey has resigned to take a job in Northfield. This leaves two vacancies on the Commission. If they are not filled or the Commission size reduced., a quorum problem may develop. RECOMMENDATION If the Council is considering a reduction in the size of the Commission, they should initiate a code amendment to do so and refer it to the Planning Commission. Otherwise, Council should authorize staff to advertise to fill the two vacancies. GOPLANCOMM Attachment: Survey MEMORANIXJM TO: City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, .,Planning Intern SUBJECT: Survey of Planning Commissions LATE March 227 1989 I NTRODUCT I ON The City Council requested a survey of the size and duties of other Planning Commissions. This survey included 26 cities in the metropolitan area closest in size to Maplewood (based on the 1980 census) or adjacent to the City* MEMBERSHIP The composition of Fll anning Commissions varies from five to ten members" The majorityg 17 of 26 cities, have seven member Planning Commissions. Three of the cities use alternateso DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES The general duties of the Planning Commission are to act as an advisory committee to the City Council , to review applications and make recommendations on these applications and to study planning issues. Other responsibilities are as follows: reviewing al 1 p ans, pol icies and programs for level opment in order to promote orderly developments preparing and recommending a Comprehensive Plan as we I as reviewing all Plan amendmentso am" assisting in zoning administration and reviewing all zoning regul at ion amendments. The following are special tasks not done by all the Planning Commissions: conducting long-range plannings undertaking special studies for the City Councils sitting as Boards of Review or Appeal W GPM reviewing all City construction proposals over $10,0000 APPL I CAT I ONS REV I E14EEI 1. Variances: 19 of 26 cities. 2. CUP's or SUP's: 26 of 2610 3. Rezoning: 26 of 26" 4. Code Amendments: 23 of 26. 6 of these relate only to.zoning issues. 5. Platting: 26 of 26. 6a Minor subdivisions: 20 of 260, 7. PUD-1s: 25 of 258 G. Publ ic vacations: 9 of 260 9. Home occupations: 12 of 25. 10... Sicin permits: 6 of 26. 11, Site plans: 20 of 26M 12. Building permits: 2 of 260 13 N Capital Improvement Programs: 10 of 26. PUBLIC HEARINGS 23 of the 26 Planning Commissions hold public hearings. In most of these cities, the City Council also held a hearing, resulting in two hearings on each case. MEETINGS Planning Commissions meet from as few as three times a year to twice a. month o F I NAL AUTHORITY In four cities, the Planning Commission had final approval authority, subject to appeal to the City Council This authority was in regard to 1) site plan approval requiring no variances, 2) site plan approval and special use permits and 3) two cases relating to variances. PAYMENT Six cities paid their Planning C6mmission members. One paid per month ($70 for members and $85 for the chairman) . The other five paid per meeting, from $8 per meeting to $25 per meetingn One city will begin paying their commissioners in the near future. BGPCOMM I�a��1�i11L '�II�II�YI�II�i�i��ll�a�l��u• ��aa�i �rm�i � w�.�...� ��....� ��•..- ;�._. --. t! �'liBlfl��llll �II�IB�II�i I III I I I II ■I __� • Iii ■'1 �,11 11 ill�l� - CI I I I I I I � , ; � II 11 I�I� �I Nil �111�11�111■ t. - �'.Il•��ill�tll�i �1�11 � I 11 oil 'Isms 111111 di Si NJ Imm Nil Ell Ell .°.!; - ., �i i��° ■� Moll r� ■��� i Eli i �m■! l ,.,,, .■ . �2�:� Nil 11111111 oil Ell mill , ■ ie ;�� �u010 nm �� wNil i �� 11 n,oEil 10i� opt 1 �� �i����;��u���■ �a�►;z'r�a �.��a��u�w�i��w�i� �,Re�i���i�ii� �ii��iii� � �n�u 111111111111MAN 1? ■!�'i�� 1.1 ��'; �. HIM] 1 11 III ■1111 II �II����II ■II��I'=1 n1�1Vt! II� 11 11 II NEW I �II III mI III III �t i ■ i ,11 ;1111111 R% Mill 1.11 ■X111 �1�, ■i. i� ■i��i�■iII � �il�1 um� l uis�lioul w �i� _ ■ IIUfl1�, 1111�11�i1�111�I11Ii1��i11�111�1�11 III 11111�11���1�j �oIII fell '��7,IIf1111�J� �1�111111� III mI I■II � t!I f!�I��IINM�I.l ►11��llllilit ■��- ■;��IGr71■;��Ii�Ai��B'��� ■�� ���! ����� ��� Nil u.' fi�fii�IG�► �i�I�ICt3����N�u���iit •71�!��������fl ■, � � oil 111i1a!r YmmillNimmilm wmtuw�� ;�u�w��w����� MINI i�m�����m��■i�mm�ii ye�i�mn��i�i a�n�i�mm i� • �i��cn i�� �i1fr�� !II�,�,nI�,nri�n���m����� Mii� �i�� ����!��t� ���i� �ia�■i� ■i��u ���i�i� nmilli � uoil 0 i� � �iiy�in��ii�Citw ol I0II �•l . • II • N11U��I�II�Y � mill MEIN 1I11�W� ►1111111 III Ell IIII�IIID�llli" ID�! 11'✓ ��II�a//► ��I1G► �1� !II�/,��IIIi���:ICICW�I1AW�l AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT ' . TO: City Manager`' ' FROMx Assistant City Engineer ' . SUBJECT: Hillcrest Sanitary Sewer, Project 86-22 Assessment Hearing Appeal Review R U DATE: May 11 1989 Nine appeals to the subject assessment were received. Copies of the appeals are attached. A review of each of the appeals followsx PIN 24-29-22-21-0008, Nielsen The location of the petroleum pipeline was located relative to the potential lots. The pipeline is shown on the plans for Lakewood Street, which is attached with 14 potential lots S.uperimposed on it. The pipeline is such that there mould be 100 feet of clearance from the back' of a house with a future street centered on the east property fine of the parcel to the pipeline | for the south seven potential l.ots. The other seven potential lots would have between 80 - 100 feet of setback from the back of house to the pipeline. Lots could be created provided that the lcts.are graded to provide a be rm between the pipeline and house. Fourteen potential lots conforming with Current code are feasible. The appeal should be denied. PIN 24-29-22-31-0003, Bulk Service � The assessment units are the same as for the water tower assessment, Project 86-03A. None of the factors referenced have changed since the time of the water tower assessment. There is no basis for revising the assessment. PIN 24-29-22-21-0054, Junek This appeal was investigated prior to the assessment hearing. It is valid as was discussed in the April 17, 1989 agenda report. io This appeal is based on objection to the ten units assigned to the parcel. As point of information, ten units were assigned under Project 86-03 water tower assessment and were sustained in spite of owner's objection. See attached letter from community development, and in particular page four for a conceptual area street plan. Based on this concept, the appeal should be denied. Project 86-22 2 May 1, 1989 PIN 24-29-22-11-0001,24-29-22-12-0001v St. Paul Priory The number of units assessed' are the same as used under Project 86--03. There has been no change in the situation since the water tower assessment. The appeal does not cite any substantive actual factor to be evaluated as the basis of a revision. The appeal should be denied. ' PIN 13'29'22-43-8001, Hill-Murray High School ` The number of units assessed are the same as used under Project 86-03. There has been no change in the situation since the water tower assessment. The appeal does not cite any substantive actual factor to be evaluated as the basis of a revision. The appeal should be denied. }`IN24-29-22-22-0018v Thurstin A review of the feasibility of a lot split of the parcel was mm\de° A second lot can be created. The assessment should stand. PIN 24-29-22-22-0026 2 ! ` / Senior citizen deferment or-cancelation is requested. No comment. ' PIN 24-29-22-23-009() ' There is no basis for a revision cited in the appeal. The assessment should stand~ ' BAI jc 1 1 I Sr I jLxcv-.t —T" 14Z4��X.11 Icy-, fr C.0 � Of A! VO ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL F= DFF tl PROJECT NO. 86-22 Address of Assessed Parcel 1300 N. I)CKNIGITr RD, ST. PAUL, 55119 e Property I dent i f i c at i on Number :. 2 4 _ 29 _ 22 _ 31 _ 0003 (12 digit number) Zio YOU wish to address the city counc i 1 tonight? (x-) (_ ) Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city COUnc i l to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. 'This form mast be compl eted 'and f i 1 ed wi th the c i ty c l erk r o 1 ester ti r- n t1 close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. YOUr request will become pant of the pub 1 i c hearing record. Z request that the city counc i 1 consider (check- one) R Lief erra 1 of assessment b . C,) Senior C i t i z- en deferment ( over 65- years of age) C . C ) Cancellation of assessment die C ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: We feel the sanitary sewer lunits fo �.t11is proj-)erty arE' tcx� }lic�h d«�� to �_l�e fact that we have about 7 acres of wetland and another 2 ��c1-c�s not ����c,��l>> c because of new McKnight Rd (slopes, roadwt-iy zuid eater ja-i i ji also have about 2 acres more taken up by tic pi W l i nc ca s� vt . ,,i i t . 3CN ' ASSOCIATES LIMITED PAIn'NF.IZSI 1:I P (Fr i nt Name) 1300 MCKNIGIIT RON) N (Signature) (Date) ( 612 ) 777 -3132 ( Address of Property Owner) Telephone M-\PLEWOOD f MN. Zip 5 51 19 312 7 ASSESSIIENT HEARING APPEAL. f=Uld-I PROJECT Address s of Assessed F'arc e 1 - - , F'rop ert y I d en t i f i c at i on Number: (12 digit number) Zoo YOU wish to address the city COUncil tonight:-' ( - c � Please complete this form i f o y U intend to appeal to the c i t. y c OUnc i l to defer, revise or cancel OUr y assessment. This form mUst be completed and filed with the city clerk erg.: no later ater tt-)an tt -)c c1 ose of tonight's city coUnciI assessment he r' will become part of the Ub l i c h 1 ng . Your req��est P earing record. x regUest that the city coUnc i l cons i der (check:. one) . Deferral of assessment b - (,..�� Senior Citizen deferment (over be years of age) Cancellation of assessment d • Cat) Revision of assessment Reason f or the request • (Print Name) (Signature) (Lute) I ( Address of Property Owner) T e 1 ephon e )CI Zip �1 ! ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT N 0 . Address of Assessed Parcel j Zl'lQ 191 C-l`? dent i f i cation Number: Property I (12 digit umber) ! Do you wish to address the city council tonight? es No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise .or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a, ( ) Deferral of. assessment Senior citizen deferment-(over 65 years of age) c. (�) Cancellation of assessment d. ( ) Revision of assessment Reason for request ,, S � �.�r./� LCD ?� �s � ✓s-I � r� �, G�f r'c�C � % �1 � i n . �-�' ;�. lS f'�J�.o� (7 /✓ � 6��/��1/.t/ £/'S CC' �� �Oec/ C') � Cz/�7s9- '`7C a X/1--c-, r ��,5 ti �. l�� y✓ 1 � v T1/0 2 � /J ��'z �%���I�•sf3- p�C i�,2s" ,_ w �. � � � C_ i 71�-� TS� /.S C�..�i;�! GrJ OtJLO c- ly f, 7D S� /V /V /�70 P.- O r/i, ��rf�' (PRINT NAME) IGNATURE) (DATE) L-Z�!e (Address of Property Owner) Telephone 4"Ir- f? s�� Zip 7 7y 1-- 4 Z L �, OIL,/ setc cti✓r c 2 � � %? b �'a uL b %✓ �' rl-� A--< PW0032 s t '�'rj r� 1,.-- J � . i �''i l,..r N ` � � c�• �„•1 � r� C �\ S' �. � . ; J ? li y '�.1 � � - _— ,• .� 7 � 3 - . — ` � --- � � � — <.. ( — � _. r . ) 1— 4 y { iii li�,�� �, � � ��. / }�t° (I � Q � �i .l 1 1 •1�/ } �. t J'� 1 1 1 �! � � �� � � 1•� 1 a S V - �'"� � cL:. Y1 c�, err � •, _ _ c�. lti--� � � �, � �r �` � .� ,r— <_ i �,� , ., lit all V�') (.-A v— It Z-sc Y" P S<? �---- _ t- ' l r + �•' � � t1�R "fit -J�• i . Rt.! r� �' � .yl.,;. ,�. ���• ,,j •• C �� , •* sE��tt i ` j ,A• aye�t�' �, > t w • �W ZP `� J� tji, l U f ��1�j}�,i }�«j;t ►�j + •• '�� 1�?f' . • is ra • ; •. `*' � R`t � • r! .t.. � �� t;11 ,'r: ' { � r � ��,� !,(+ , hr�r`1 �R .��1.' ' e"•� Zry 1' • 'iD?i���t1�•� r, .r �'t� =N�'�1��r'.�4{� '�E• �'�'�s�Y.Mrit•• ir►i`.a•Y•,�'� 'r ��'1 1 �.; � �f. ♦ i. ° 'x'10 � ti� 17 r � t r:�l{r • `� .ir l , � � x,11 �t��. Sri y • 1.' j7'" ♦ { i � '' � _1 '�. ,..{i � �'� ��rr1.. ' ai!' .,y; �1�� � � � ,t ��'�, �t J�� .. � �i A � ��'' , �1 ♦ (( • � ' ♦ ,1 / • � a "• • � � �t +i t, A l?R�r•zy :jl+ , \, �� • i �F,, Tr 41,'�A ^� +k .#�1�,i � ,* "! fi+ tTI� ", ., ^� . r� y.• iii < ,! � d .� 1, }�'''•1i, ►t ,� lr r, r'A. � , ♦'I�1 :. �j •'r � / li ,1 y� :�! 1r: • aa.� '� t :} '•1 f +f� � }!�'Si'' -.:. r . '1. ,• �a `N: ,' / '{� ' .. L. • �i �{' r •f �I'.M' J ' t i ,1 1 S .�." a. '1/ tl �.: 1<'Nr * � ♦e#7 ♦. � ,�� • ..'`,. 4 +� y^ '` .., i t � � .�. -c i � �f ".'� t i � :d i % �+.• r i + ! �+. a! '�_! t f 1 .',, • v. ;:w w ;,- � +t �,. ♦. a , � y :., `" y. r .r . `� • }i .# Ai • r r � � , l * j. �.!'. ,y ., % } . +1 ,;11•,.. ,s '� j1r q•'rti l y +y /�'�1 + i � .y '•i Yj '•1',• ;'.•� 1 :r �,* .y! !tt "x.:•y•�y +.. �. ,r< / � {'�j';• y�� ♦ .� •H A �i' 'i" r i.;. • ., '. .r:� ,I� N ` ,� •f a� b�, lr� ✓..n/� r . ri 'a . s•a�" ^.i - ".'',t� �. As 4 �T. �♦ N .i• i' i�,l� ',vf, .�i.. ♦ .. •r .f �. ,.� �f•. _ ,�,,...�... I/ 1 +4 Y.i • Ir7•' ''i. , r . 1 . t „i r .�:� -'1. /.A. s., : '� Y *� » t ,. 1. .l rV• � le . A l/ i i. � •►. , f• �. H• N; - +� '1., «' v. ,�.,tr � � ,��'• ♦� ;. r.. -`•/� �1,'1?.t r � �, .w 1-' .t: 1 �r �k.,, . +'.T�;, a, 'r •1 M: f \ . K r 4, .M E ,.,» J'.' i a:.�.• 1 .. 7C,. r '., ....•_�'�i1'....i.h,. •.1.Yht.- ., ..i+�• .a}+.a�.+... .l,— •n4Nr�•....±• �,t ,._tC+i n iM•C'�l�. VL .. .►•.. r , . S .�. "t r'a .i . ri .. ,. �•4 .•,.. �i�.•�i. �` +, - ?�_1.. ..w_+ir.... .. ,,- ':i:., ...+► ..,, RICHARD A. MOORE WILLIAM F ORME MARVIN J. PERTZIK A. PATRICK LEIGHTON HAROLD R. FOTSCH RONALD E. MARTELL WILLIAM M. BEADIE DENIS L. STODDARD LARRY A. HANSON J. PATRICK PLUNKETT JOHN M. H.ARENS ROBERT G. DANIELSEN DAVID A. KASTELIC GREGORY M. BISTRAM PHYLLIS KARASOV CHRIS R. KABELLA MOOR E, COSTE LLO & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1400 NORWEST CENTER 55 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1792 TELEPHONE (612) 227 -7683 TELECOPIER ( 612) 290-1770 (WITH ATTORNEYS AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAW IN MINNESOTA, IOWA, WISCONSIN, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND. GEORGIA, NEBRASKA AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA) April 21, 1989 • �� I a v BARBARA L. NEILSON MALCOLM G. McDONALD MARY GIULIANI STEPHEN LEONARD W. GLEWWE JOHN G. PATTERSON GERALD E. GOSCH TIMOTHY C. COOK KATHRYN A. GRAVES MICHAEL B. RODNING BASH SUSAN M. MINDRUM DEBORAH B. HALLBECK JAMES F. KILLIAN STEVEN D. SNELLING JAMES A. BOBZIEN FRED W. FISHER OF COUNSEL WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL: 290 -1.745 Hand Deliver City of Maplewood Maplewood Municipal Building 1830 East County Road 6 Maplewood, Minnesota Attn: City Clerk Re: Objection to Sewer Assessment Project 86 -22 Tax Payer: St. Paul's Priory Dear City Clerk: Please find enclosed g o for filing 1 i n the Notice of Objections of St. Paul's Prior to Proposed Assessment for Sanitary Sewer and Sewer Service Priory p f Ma lewood Minnesota. This Connections by the City Cou nc i 1 of the City o p Notice is being filed.in accordance with Minn, Stat. § 429.0610 Very truly yours MOORE$ COSTELLO & HART Byr V �bhn G. Patterson y JGP /trs Enclosure cc: Sister Joan Utecht • NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS OF ST. PAUL'S PRIORY TO PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER AND SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA s Pursuant to Minn. Stat, § 429.061, St. Paul's Priory (Priory), 2675 East Lar P enteur Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55109, objects to proposed Assessment No. 86 -22, File No. 5717, for the following properties: PIN: 24- 29 -22 -11 -0001 $36,000 PIN: 24- 29 -22 -12 -0001 - $ 99900 The Prior objects to the proposed assessments for the following reasons: Priory A. the proposed, assessments constitute an unconstitutional taking of the Priory',,s property without dust compensation in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I Section 7 of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota B. the ro os�ed assessments are not uniform upon the same classes p P of pcoper� y i n v i of ati on of Article X. Section 1 of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota; C. the ro osed assessments constitute an unfair, disproportionate, P P arbitrary .and excessive proportion of the costs of the improvement; and D. the proposed assessments do not benefit the property. Much of the property is undeveloped and not suitable for development because of low lying marshy areas and unsuitable soil conditions. WHEREFORE, the Priory requests that the City Council deny approval of the proposed assessments and that a reassessment be made, reduced and ' ed to such amounts as are proper and in accordance with applicable limit P P law. f Dated • Uohn G atterson Attorney License No. 144320 Of MOORS, COSTELLO & HART 1400 Nor-west Center 55 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone: (612) 227 -7683 Attorneys for St. Paul's Priory 6 - 2 - RICHARD A. MOORE WILLIAM FORME MARVI N J. PERTZ I K A. PATRICK LEIGHTON HAROLD R. FOTSCH RONALD E. MARTELL WILLIAM M. BEADIE DENIS L. STODDARD LARRY A. HANSON j. PATRICK PLUNKETT JOHN M. HARENS ROBERT G. DANIELSEN DAVID A. KASTELIG GREGORY M. BISTRAM PHYLLIS KARASOV CHRIS R. KABELLA M 00 R E, C OSTELL.O & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1400 NORWEST CENTER 55 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1792 TELEPHONE (6121227-7683 TELECOPIER 16121 290-1770 tWITH ATTORNEYS AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAW IN MINNESOTA. IOWA, WISCONSIN, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND. GEORGIA, NEBRASKA AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA) Apri 1 21, 1989 Hand Deliver City of Maplewood Maplewood Municipal Building 1830 East County Road B Mapl ewood , Mi nnesota Attn : City Clerk BARBARA L. N EI LSON MALCOLM G. MCDONALD MARY GIULIANI STEPI,41:N``a LEONARD. W. GLEWWE JOHN G. PATTERSON GERALD E. GOSCH TIMOTHY C. COOK KATHRYN A. GRAVES MICHAEL B. RODNING BASH SUSAN M. MINDRUM DEBORAH B. HALLBECK JAMES F. KILLIAN STEVEN D. SNELLING JAMES A. BOBZIEN FRED W. FISHER OF COUNSEL WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL: 290 -1745. Re: Objection to Sewer Assessment . Project 86 -22 Tax Payer: St. Paul s Priory Dear City Clerk: ' of Objections of St. Paul's enclosed for filing Please find the Notice Sewer and Sewer Service Proposed Assessment for Sanitary Priory to P f Ma l ewood , Minnesota. This • the City Council of the City o p Connections by Not ice is being f i t ed in accordance with Minn. State § 429.061. Very truly yours, M)OORE, COSTELLO & HART r'4- By -C- - f , 4ohn G. Patterson JGP /trs Enclosure cc. Sister Joan Utecht • ' ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM ` ' PROJECT NO. 2- ` ' - Address of Assessed Parcel ` Property Identification Number: � , ` (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No ' ` Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form ` must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request wil l become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city Council consider (check one): ` --' R . () Deferral of assessment --' b. () Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) co () Cancellation of assessment ' � d^ ( /() Revision of assessment 7=� , .`=a=".. for the . =' �" 1 U Z z& 40 //,/ZZ ex (Print Name) (SignatUre). ate) (Address'o"f Property Owner) Telephone Ole 7>000`4�/ '7�4 . Zip I ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT N0. Address of Assessed Parcel Property r t I d e n t i f i c a t i o n Number :- �. - ,.,._ - Z P Y (12 digit number) address the c i t Y counc i 1 tonight? (Ye Do you wish to des No complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council .Please comp Y to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be rom leted and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of Your request will become , nnight s city council assessment hearin g part of the public hearing record. I request that the city counci 1 consider (check one) : a, O Deferral of assessment b, Senior citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C-0 (�) Cancellation of assessment d, ( ) Revision of assessment Reason f or request " _. .. (PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE) (DATE) 5 lee - ._..L (Yd-dress of Property Owner) Telephone Zip. CZ w �� U PWO032 i 1595 Myrtle St. Maplewood, MN 55119 Project No. 86-22 PIN 24- 29 -22 -22 -0018 D/P No . 5717 City of Maplewood 2830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 We are protesting the assessment on our property for a double assessment on the sanitary sewer. The property has a single family dwelling on it and one sewer. There will be no division of the property or a second sewer unit put in while we reside at the property. To the best of our knowledge, the original assessment on the sewer when first put in was for a single family dwelling and.a single sewer assessment. This should not change with time since-the property has not changed. We feel that this -is an infringement on our right to have a larger land parcel than other residents in the area. As property owners who reside in Maplewood, in a long established neighborhood, this is saying to us either build on your extra lot or sell it and let someone develop it. If in the future it is built.on, then the property should be assessed, but we as the property owners now should not have to pay for possible future development on the land. It is not our desire to develop this "possible second lot" but the City of Maplewood is saying to us either develop or pay an extra tax. This is unfair to us as single family dwelling owners. Sincerely, .James E. Thurstin, Sr. Franceen D. Thustin I lie, APR ASSESSMENT HEAF\' I Nv OF='F"LAL F= (. ld"i PROJECT NO.- 14 li • Address of Assessed Parcel ZC 494/. kV F'rop ert y I d e n t i f i c a,t i on Number: (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No .Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight ' s city counc i 1 assessment hearing. Your request w i 1 i become part of the pub t i c hearing record. I request that the city count i 1 consider (check one) : am C ) Deferral of assessment bm Senior C i t i Z en deferment (over b'--' years of age) c. (y Cancel 1 at i on of assessment d C ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: 1 I i X4 �1�� �. �. �10 fr %_SC �/� L �Z�' cs� � � �,- •- 2`��'�. -C" _ E // — � t 2 (Print Name) (Signature) Lute) Z e4 04Z �0 X (Address of Property Owner) Telephone AIA If, L � k. � Q. I� � zip — i P RaTME44 To' aF PcJ 8 Lo4 C oQ.icS c ery of mAPLEwooD 1930 E r 'y R B �MAPt.E lOOD � OK 04 SS /O`% i I 'Su¢SGC sg,✓iroRY SE Ek u r,5 'PRR�EL =D�TiticRTia.� rcu..�eE2 zy -Z? v 2 2- Z3 -oo90 M5 LuGILLE A"AE L I USI Z.F,7rLk 1, Z, S C4K V E AS My APPEAL �4.TArH+Eb L REG�4R�i�/4 30 0 ° —° #46sESSMcvai yov ROVissA /s W I tF Ho v r 7r- AGS msy ay /9Y9� Ago is "'L way of wR -.77w1*ta Zolact oF#O+y VOJI;CfFOW /4etoRaF�✓eE � rvo0oa Na T I C E of P U 8 L I C I M P R O V E M E N T MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAME = HILL 80-22 IMPROVEMENT 5717 Pi ID Z4 29 ZL 23 OU90 THOMAS F TKUHLER KATHLEEN J TRUHLE k 237l NEBRASKA AVE E MAPLLWOUU PROPERTY em dm U E S C R 1 P T 10 CAVES NEBRASKA ADDITION LOT 9 8LK 1 P E N D I N G Na T I C E of P U 8 L I C I M P R O V E M E N T MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAME = HILL 80-22 IMPROVEMENT 5717 Pi ID Z4 29 ZL 23 OU90 THOMAS F TKUHLER KATHLEEN J TRUHLE k 237l NEBRASKA AVE E MAPLLWOUU PROPERTY em dm U E S C R 1 P T 10 CAVES NEBRASKA ADDITION LOT 9 8LK 1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD a 30 E. COUNTY ROAD B 1 :p 5 513 0 9 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENI OF' P'UBLIC WORi",� E= EZ D NO, 5717 t3E —;r.c. HlLLC.RES'l- TRUNK SEWER PROJECT NOW THIS IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL I RECEIVE I'l 0 I-JERSTAND "I'OUR RI(3H D C, L4 p, r YOU READ AND FULLY UN' IT IS AS SIATED ON THE ATTACHE-D t�o -rICL OF Nils ASSESStir- H L A R .1 N G-1 P r-- Ls lzi FDL-LOWS ASS-SSMEN-T FOR plARCEL IDENT. 1FICATION, NUNlbER P-4-29-22-2- YOUR m **$-00.00-0 EACH = ������'����+c�. ���� �jA:NITARY SEWER UNITS AT etoo EACH 000 SANITARY SEWER FF AT AT 000 EACH SEWER SERVLI.P-'Ll E EACH =icy. ���� 0 H H TER rJ, IN F.F. Al W- el 0 **$495.0001 EACH WA --ER SERVICE I AT --'5, EACH AT- oo wA-r-tR SERVICE ----� 00 YOUR TOTAL ASSESSME NT FOR THIS PARCEL, IS F L k (H 1 �3 C Cj 10 REUUE R W I � '*4 FluiTiON PARCEL IDEkyl '[HE C; L Cl WILL BE Acc;,t--pc(F-'j) UN -rlL- -1 HE "T U H*4\--�* PIART r TH I N WRITING) UN-b -ru . HL OR Ili N U TL LUTELY No OBJECTIONS (UR' ��-r HE ABSO cc;Ev-,-[ ED 'f+1L CITY CLERI/ OR 1--sSINIE L Aj C A+ Asst: S-1 ATL�IEN-1 W ILL Bi P 1,4*1* HEAR I NGI OF THlS C L Ou OF '1'HE 0 D CoUi--4CIL AFTER THE MAPLEWO so 4w am so PAY?" low dw DETACH W WTURN THIS PORTION WITH Y00 D/P NO. 5717 86 —��-- HILLCREST TRUNK SEWER JISSESSMENT pAYMENT for PROJECT NO. PIN 24-29-22-2.5-0090 TOTAL ASSESSMENT TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED - $ PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHORIZED. .Nzat ,sr s6N \ 69 dF ' t S- - dry !F: } ; • 7,11 It _• t. 7 cc -OC 1 AVI Q f m a O t t pji • - /� I i W ' cc 7 1 ` , Iw �_ ICC _ W ` © W ' , r� Q J 3 a�^. . ' I z w \ .. �,tr C%j r _ _ — uj , 1 ► a I Lr CL p i (' ' • �I . so� .4� 1 LL ' # 0 j ' � 1 • t r t t -�' d '� • ,- `� it ' 1 I j ♦ I co • + 1 ' All °t W • . W •q�r� � 1 q'... cc -iins O f 1 � r •• 1 O N - I Y AV I M • �aV b • it • N ~ _ ., cim N N J It 1 �s i �^ �.�.. -. 1 .�iti .rat 1 •., • ~ f� •••- .. �• r•.. •� WMw' ,- 3f1N3Ad C - 031.43dbd3 IS31v1S3 SODOM 3ldvw "i gl 1 K ff ' 3, 17 CITY OF M P E-WOOD I-A 1830 EAS "I'. CO. IZOAD B I�IAPLENVOOI), rIINNESW'A 5510.9 E, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612 - 770 -4560 July 7, 1987 Ms. Evelyn Salkowicz 1240 McKnight Road Maplewood, MN 55119 LOT DIVISION REQUEST - -1200 McKNIGNT ROAD Future development potential of this property: To efficiently use the northeast portion of your property and the properties to the north and east, it appears that Nokomis Avenue should be extended through your property to the new 11cKnight Road alignment. A concept area street plan is provid�d on page 4. We realize that this street extension ma;i nO L occur for many years, as it would require your house to be relocated or removed. It is, however, important to plan for the long term best use of the property. As a consequence, the proposed 210 feet of depth for Parcel One (Map 1) cannot be approved unless you present an acceptable alterna- tive street layout that will accommodate the proposed lot depth. Conditional lot division approval.: A 1 00- foot -wide single - dwelling lot to front on Maryland Avenue may be subdivided from the southeast corner of your property, subject to: 1. Reducing the lot depth from 210 feet (243 feet to the center of Maryland Avenue) to 165 feet (198 feet to the center of Maryland Avenue) or demonstrate that an east /west extension of Nokomis Avenue can be constructed through your site with lots on either side, with- out shortening the depth of proposed Parcel One. 2. Subdivision of and combination of Parcel Three (2.5 foot -wide- parcel) with Parcels One and Two (as required to be revised in Condition One), so that no part of Parcel Three has a separate property tax identification number. Mrs, Evelyn Salkowicz Page 2 July 7, 1987 3. All deeds associated with.'this request must be recorded within six months or this.approval will be null and void, Once Conditions One and Two have been satisfied you may submit the deed y y (s) to me for endorsement and then have it recorded with Ramsey County. Please be advised that proof of a recorded deed(s) for Parcel One (including the abutting portion of Parcel Three) must be submitted with a building permit application if construction is proposed within the next six months, If you choose to appeal any of the requirements of this conditional lot division approval, please.submit a written letter within ten days to: Geoff Olson, A I CP, Director Department of Community,Development 1830 E. County Road 6 Maplewood, MN 55109 Your letter should include written justification for the appeal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 770 -4560, s - RANDALL JOHNSON,' AICP — ASSOCIATE PLANNER jW Enclosures: 1. Property Line /Zoning Map (applicant's proposed lot division) 2. Concept Area Street Plan 3. Excerpt from the Maplewood Drainage Plan cc: City Clerk City Engineer I � . ..4 boundary I L' I 10 07 —c. o50 040 030 020 Qtit o 052 53 S3 53 1 53 53 z4ol. APPLICANT'S PROPOSED �: C1.5 �.s LOT DIVISION o , PARCEL 1 y a ; 2'3°` C; P � � W 5 ` � q 88 1 88 1 88 1 68 75 Ito k� �. _ 1322,51 A N ........ 2A ivi PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 1 4 N J 1993.0 X 9670 x /r� 9870 o f e r X. X9830 X997.0. (98 C, C, P31 of rj Ir Q 000 f x :zO X r,K) 1-01 ......... ...... -A - 0 10()0 �X' I x 982 0 CN 98 10 ' ) < > o Ruins y • ••• lY •A C �� ' .r Y 0 � 1P, % 10 2 0 tj&A 2 td A 46% LY0 -1,* 1007.0 x 10� 41 �;' 4,, 4,1 984 C W A 6.0) dj 0 co D 5 4:zz 1 x 0 0 .1 /7 %9 4.01P 9 1 P-400010 fl u I I 'NO-KO ❑lk \0 '11001 CA &L F 3 A F 8 88 88) LA—f 0c, rt ve S F cPW 0 to',, dvo 91 kA , P, a-- S 110, CONCEPT AREA STREET PLAN (Informational Purposes Only) Proposed 100 x 210 foot parcel Attachment 2 r z :. �C 0 Cb Ilk • • • / MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE •t • - INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES -- �; PROPOSED STORM EWER a`;, S poll EXISTING STORM SEWER -- --------' .. OPEN CHANNEL o STORM WATER STORAGE AREA i •;. INUNDATION AREA Rt STORAGE AREA VOLUME 4 AF Y: DISCHARGE IN CFS - CD CITY LIMITS ...... ........... DRAINAGE PLAN EXCERPT 5 Attachment 3 4 N � AGENDA REPORT ww� AGENDA ITEM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works ` ` ` SUBJECT: Storm Water General Assessmen t Pol icy/Geranium-- Ferndale Storm Sewer Assessments, Project 87-20 DATE: May 1, 1989 INTRODUCTION The assessment hearing for Project 87-20 was continued to May 8, 1989. The staff was directed to propose a specific storm sewer ` assessment policy for the future storm sewer needs of the entire city* The adoption of a general policy would then become the basis of assessment for 8era0jum--Ferndale storm sewer. � BACKGROUND `^ U' It is estimated that approximately $8.5 million of trunk storm sewer remains to be built, This is based on construction of pon d s, connec ti ng piping, -an d outlets f or s t orm w at er con t ro l consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. Lateral storm ^` drainage for individual streets and isolated low areas is not . . included. The trunk system serves as the backbone of the storm drainage system and'in general impacts a relatively large � drainage area. A number of the proposed trunk storm systems convey drainage from state aid streets. Therefore, a portion of the costs for these projects is eligible for funding through MnDOT state aid funds, either directly or through an off-system expenditure on the county state aid system within the city. It is estimated that about $1.2 million of funding could be procured from state aid fLtnds. This leaves approximately $7.3 million to be funded through special assessmen t s and general obligation funding. Th ere is a total of 3628 gross acres of land that has previously not been assessed and is tributary to proposed trunk storm sewers. In accord with comment received from the city Council, a breakdown of the number of existing and potential low and medium density parcels was made to determine requisite unit assessment rates~ There are approximately 4700 and 1550 existing or potential low and medium density.parcele, respectively, that could be assessed. There are about 486 net acres or 21.2 million square feet of high ' Project 87-20 -2- May 1, 1989 density residential and commercial /industrial property that remains to be assessed. ~ If all of the cost is recovered through special assessments, then the required rates are $690~00 per low or medium density residential lot and 13.9 cents per square foot of high density residential or commercial/industrial property. To attempt to recover all costs through special assessments would impose significant limitations on the flexibility of scheduling projects. A more workable 'l an would be to fund part of the cost through general obligation funds. - RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council endorse the following storm water assessment policy. All parcels that have been previously unassessed for storm sewer shall be assessed at the following rates: Low Density Residential $5O0.00/unit Medium Density Residential $500.00/unit High Density Residential $ 0.10/square foot Commercial/Industrial 0.10/square foot Golf courses, play fields, cemeteries, parks, and open space are exempt except for parking lots or other impervious surfacing associated with these properties that shall be assessed at $0.10 per square foot. Churches d schools would be assessed at the^ , ',' / ` rate of $0.10 per square foot with the exemption of substantial � associated unpaved play field. . These rates will generate $5,25 million in current funds. To fund the balance of trunk storm sewer needs would require the . appropriation of $2.0 million of general obligation financing. It is recommended that Maplewood actively pursue the completion of a trunk storm sewer system through several more encompassing `area-wide projects over a limited time frame in response to a ~ current problem rather than small localized projects. Larger projects are generally more competitively bid and have a lower - percentage of administrative and engineering costs. Larger projects are more cost effective and generally produce a more satisfactory product. If the rate of inflation is significant during the time span of trunk storm sewer construction, then the rates should be increased proportionally. There are 30 low density residential units tributary to the Geranium--Ferndale storm sewer. An assessment roll is attached based upon a $500.00 unit assessment as discussed herein. This would recover $15,000.00. The balance of $32,585.00 that was to Project 87-2(-*') -2-- May i , 1 989 have been assessed wool d be financed through general obligation f u1 1 d i n g M ACTION REQUIRED Due. to the significant reduction of proposed assessments and change of basis, a new assessment hearing shout d be cal l ed . Reso l ut i on s to order an assessment hearing are attached., BAI jw Attachments PAGE 1 OF 1 ' D/P NO~ 584� PROJECT NO. R7-20 GERANlUM/FERNDF&-E (R) PROJECT SUMMARY R-22—UQ-11 26 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER, RATE � -- --�____ __________ STORM SEWER Is ~cloo 00T AT **$500.000 EA. = ' GRAND TOTALS 26 PARCELS ASSESSED ' ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE -------------- __________ STORM SEWER ********28.000 UNIT AT **$500.000 EA. = | TOTAL`AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = | ASSESSMENT ' **$14,000.N0 ASSESSMENT _ **$14,000.0N ***$14,000.00 PROJECT NOS R7--20 CERANI UM/FERWDALE (R) PAGE 1 CIF 1 0�;-- 01- -198`j D /P NOw 5847 QUANT I TY CHECK L- I ST COL.. 1 a = STORM SEWER --- UNIT PIN NO. COL. 1 25--29-22-11-0016 1, lZio 25-29-22-11-0017 1,00 25-29-22-11-0018 ti.J r 00 . 25-29-22-11-0020 1.00 25--29-22-11-0021 1. elel . 25-29-22--1 1-0024 1.00 25-29-22-11-0025 1.00 25-29-22-11-0026 1.00 25-29--22-11-0027 1.00 1 i s5 —29 - -22—f l l'- ""00,.'.0 1. 00 25-29-22-11 - 0K.`%336 25-29--22-11-0038 29- -22.1 1 -00;8 1. L/Iili 25-29-22-11-0039 l .iii, 25-29-22-11-0042 1. 00 1..tti..i��1...9- 2 2 - 11 x0043 1.00 25--29-22-11-0044 1.00 C5-29-22-11-0045 1. 00 GRAND TOTALS C2, 3 r [ziI {i j `^ D/P NO~ 5847 PROJECT NO. R7_20 ` ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER STORM SEWER *********1.000 TOTAL ASSEBSMENT = STORM SEWER *********1.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT= STORM SEWER 000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STORM SEWER *********1.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER *********1.000 TOTAL'ASSESSMENT = STORM SEWER *********1.00N ' TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STORM SEWER *********t.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STORM SEWER TOTAL ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER TOTAL ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER 000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT GERANIUM/FERNDALE (R) RATE __________ UNIT AT **V500.001ZI EA. = UNIT AT **$500.000 EA. = UN IT Ar = UNIT AT **$50W.000 EA. = !' ^ , .UNIT AT **$1500.000 EA. = ,( .. UNIT AT **$500.m Eu' = UNlT AT **$500.Wm� EA = UNIT AT **$500.0u� LA. = UNIT Al UNIT AT **$5�@.WQ� PAGE 1 OF 3 05-01-1989 ASSESSMENT � ---------- 25-2-13-22-11 -0016 ******$50N.00 41- *****$500.0N 25-29-�2-11-0N17 ******$500.W0 2157-29-22-11-0018 ================ W-w $1,514)0.00 ****�1,500.00 25-29-22-11-0019 ================ ******$5iz,0.00 �5-29-22-11-00D0 ================ ******$50W.00 25-29-22-11-0021 ================ $5W0'0 N *^***$�(",N.Nw �5_29-�2-11-�W22 ================ ******$50�W0 ******$500.N� 25-29-22-11-0024 ================ ******$50.0.00 &i 25-29-22-l1-0�25 ================ ******$500.CI0 25-29-22-11-0026 ================ ^*****$500.ol� . 05-01-1989 PROJECT NO~ R7-20 GERANIUM/FERNDALE (R) [ D/P NO. i 5847 - . ASSESSMENT ROLL ' � ' 'ITEM - QUANTITY PER '____ ' RATE __________ ASSESSMENT __________ � ! , . ` 25-29-22-11-0027 � STORM SEWER *********1.000 UNIT AT **$500.00 0 EA. = ******$50N.00 � TOTAL - ASSESSMENT = ******$500.00 - - 25-29-22-11-0028 STORM SEWER *********1.000 UNIT AT **,'p`500.000 EA. = ******$500.vl0 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******$5o0. 0W � 25-2-29-22-11-0029 STORM SEWER *********1.000 UNIT AT ******$501�).00 - TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******$5W0.00 C-5-29-22-11-00,30 �. STORM SEWER 1.000 UNIT AT **$5N0. $500.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = k ******$5N0 o0 ^ . i' .'� , . 25-29-22-11-0031 STORM SEWER *********1.000 ^ /UNIT AT **$500.0�� EA. = *�+***$5N0.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******$500,00 25-29-22-11-0036 STORM SEWER *********1.000 �UNIT AT **$500.0N0 EA. = ******$500.0W TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ` ******$500.0N 25-29-22-11-0037 STORM SEWER *********1.000 UNIT AT **$500.0W0 EA. = �*****$50N. `0 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******$500.00 25-29-22-11-00338 STORM SEWER *********1.000 UNIT AT **$500.000 EA. = ******$500.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******$500.0N 25-29-22-11-0039 STORM SEWER *********1.000 UNIT AT **$500.000 EA. = ================ ******$500.0W TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******$500.00 25-29-22-11-0040 STORM SEWER *********1.000 UNIT AT **$50N.000 EA. = ================ ******$5Q0.0W TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******$500.00 D/P NO. '5847 ITEM PROJECT NO. R7-20 ASSESSMENT ROLL UUANTITY PER . ./ ' STORM SEWER *********1.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ' ' STORM SEWER *********1.000 TOT.AL ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER TOTAL ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER TOTAL ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER TOTAL ASSESSMENT' GERANIUM/FERNDALE (R) RATE UNIT AT **$500.000 EA. = *********1000 UNIT AT **$5500'0Nw EA. = *********1.000 UNIT AT **$5000Qu LA = / *********1.000 UNIT AT **$50N. 00m EA. = , STORM SEWER *********1.000 UNIT AT **$500.001" EA. = TOTAL ASSESSMENT = 26 PARCELS ASSESSED ' STORM SEWER ********28.000 UNIT AT **$500.000 EA. = TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = PAGE 3 OF 3 ASSESSMENT 25-29-22-11-0041 **»***$500.00 ******$500,00 215-29-22-11-0042 ******$50W.00 ******$50N.00 25-29-22-11-0043 0Q w** ***$ 0.0m 25-29-22-11-0044 ================ 25-E9-22-11-0045 ================ **_****$5N0.00 ******$500.N0 25-29-22-11-0046 ================ ******$500.00 ******$50N.00 GRAND TOTALS ============ ***$141000.00 ***$141000.00 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer have final costs for the improvement of Geranium--Ferndale Storm Sewer, City Project 87-20 a I ` NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD. MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against ev ' ery assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash va l ua ti on, as provided by l aw, an d th ey shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. FURTHER, the clerk shall , upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof. RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have at the direction of the counc �. l prepared an , P P assessment ro l l f or the c on st rL(C t i on of Geranium--Ferndale Storm Sewer, City Project 87-20, and the said assessment is an file in the office of the city clerk, w NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVELI BY THE CITY MAPLEt OOD MINNESOTA: COUt�C I L OF l A hearing shat l be held on the 12th h day of June , 1989 , at the city hail at 7 p.m. to pass upon such ro ose l P P d assessment and at such time and place all l persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an o ortun i t t PP y a be heard with Yef erence to such assessment,, 2" The city clerk i s hereby directed t o Cause _use a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be publ i shed in the Official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected b y said assessment. 3 R The notice of hearing shat i state the date, time and Rl ace of hearing , the general nature of the improvement P t the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the cl erg:: and that written or oral objections wi 1 1 be considered w �y LAW OFFICES T Y B ?IGGS AND MORGAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINWESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE (612) 291 -1215 TELECOPIEE (612) 222-4,071 INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF LEVITT, PALMER, BOWEN, $OTMAN & SHARE April 17, 1989 VIA MESSENGER Mr. Geoff Olson City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Cottages of Maplewood Project Dear Mr, Olson: f4 AC4- i on by Council:,*, Endo,�sF�' 1'tou.� -IF -14 w Dat e Attached are two resolutions relating to the Cottages of Maplewood project. The first resolution grants final approval to the (i) Multifamily Dousing Revenue Bonds, Series 1989 (Cottages of Maplewood Project -.FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) (the "Bonds "), (ii) approves certain documents.relating to the issuance of the Bonds and (iii) approves a Development Agreement with Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership relating to the tax increment financing component-of the Cottages of Maplewood project, The second resolution (i) authorizes the issuance of a Multifamily Housing Revenue Note (Cottages of Maplewood Project) and approves the form and details thereof and (ii) approves the form and authorizes the execution of certain related documents in connection with the issuance of the Note. Prior to the council meeting on Thursday, I will forward to you final copies of the attached resolutions. Very truly yours, Mary L. Ippel MLI:mg Enc 2270 MN WORLD TRADE CENTER 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK Bt ?ILDIN(: SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 291-1215 (612) 291 -1215 2400 I D S CE'.r'TER MITTNEAPOLIS, MrNTNESOTA 55402 (612) 339-0661 591A NOTE RESOLUTION CITY OF MAPLEWOOD $264,000 MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE NOTE, SERIES 1989 (COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT) ADOPTED: April 20, 1989 NOTE RESOLUTION (This Table of Contents is not a part of this Resolution, but is included for convenience only) TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE THREE - GENERAL COVENANTS .................... 20 Section 3 -1. Payment of Principal and Page ARTICLE ONE - DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION 20 AND FINDINGS 3 -2. 1 Section 1 -1. Definitions....................., 1 Section 1 -2. Legal Authorization.............. 4 Section 1 -3, Findings ......................... 4 Section 1 -4. Authorization and Ratification Nature of Security............... 21 ,Section ofProject ....................... 6 ARTICLETWO - NOTE .... ............................... 7 Section 2 -1. Authorized Amount and Form ofNote .......................... 7 Section 2 -2. The Initial NOte.. ............... 16 Section 2 -30 Execution ..,..................... 16 Section 2 -4. Delivery of Initial Note......... 16 Section 2 -5. Disposition of Note Proceeds..... 17 Section 2 -6. Registration of Transfer......... 17 Section 2 -7. Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed Note..* ......................... 18 Section 2 -8. ownership of Note ................ 18 Section 2 -9. Limitation on Note Transfers..... 19 Section 2 -10 Issuance of New Notes............ 19 ARTICLE THREE - GENERAL COVENANTS .................... 20 Section 3 -1. Payment of Principal and Interest ......................... 20 Section 3 -2. Performance of and Authority for .Covenants.................... 20 Section 3 -3. Enforcement and Performance of Covenants........ 20 Section 3 -4. Nature of Security............... 21 ,Section 3 -5. Preservation of Tax Exempt Status of the Note. .................... 21 PP ARTICLE FOUR - MISCELLANEOUS .............•..•••••••••• 23 Section 4 -10 Severability ........••..•......•. 23 Section 4 -2. Authentication of Transcript..... 23 Section 4 -301 Registration of Resolution...... -. 23 Section. 4-4. Author. i zat ion to Execute Aareements ........ ..............0 23 SIGNATURE ... 24 w NOTE RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS, LEGAL AUTHORIZATION AND FINDINGS 1 -. • Definitions. The terms used herein, unless the context hereof shall require otherwise shall have the following meanings, and any other terms defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same meanings when used herein as assigned to them in the Loan Agreement, unless the context or use thereof indicates another or different meaning or intent* Act: the relevant provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462A, 462C and 475, as amended; Bond Counsel: the firm of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and any opinion of Bond Counsel shall be a written opinion signed by such Counsel; Bond Loan A reement: the loan agreement dated as of May 1, 1989, executed by and between the City and the Company pursuant to which the City loans the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to finance a portion of the Project Costs; Bonds: the $2,230,000 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1989 (Cottages of Maplewood Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) issued by the City pursuant to the Indenture; Cit the City of Maplewood, I��is:: =n iota, its successors and assigns; Code or Internal Revenue Code: the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;. Company: Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited P artnership, its successors and assigns, and an surviving, resulting or transferee business entity which Y •g Agreement; may assume its obligations ions under the Loan Ag Construction Fund: the fund established by the City pursuant to this Resolution and into which the proceeds of the • Note will be deposited, Credit: collectively, the Initial Credit issued by Mid America and any Replacement Credit; Credit Agreement: the agreement of even date herewith, by and between the Company and the Lender, setting forth the terms under which the Lender may draw on a Credit; Declaration: the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants dated as of May 1, 1989, executed by the Company and recorded against the Project Premises; Disbursing A reement: the agreement to be executed by e it the Company and Title, relating to the disbursement the C y► P Y . of the proceeds of the Note from the Construction Fund to pay P or reimburse the Company for the costs of the construction and installation of the Project; Final Maturity Date: May 1, 1999 or such earlier date on which the entire Principal Balance of the Note, the accrued interest thereon and any premium are fully paid and discharged; Indenture: the Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1, 1989 between the City and American National Bank and Trust Com an , in St. Paul, Minnesota pursuant to which the Bonds P Y are issued; Initial Credit: the irrevocable standby letter of credit issued by Mich America; Lender: Minnesota, its successors and assigns; in Mid America: Mid America Bank Maplewood, a state banking corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota; Note: the $264,000 Multifamily Housing Revenue Note, Series s 989 Cottages of Maplewood Project), to be issued by the City pursuant to this Resolution; Note Loan Agreement: the agreement to be executed by the City nd the Company, providing for the issuance of the Note Y and the loan of the proceeds thereof to the Company, including any amendments or supplements thereto made in accordance with its provisions; 2 Note Register: the records kept by the City Manager to pro vide for the registration of. transfer of ownership of the i re 9 Note; Plans and S ec i f icat ions : the plans and specifications P1 P - ro ' ect together for the construction and installation of the P , g with such modifications thereof and additions thereto as are reasonably determined by the Company to be necessary or desirable for the completion of the Project; Pledge Agreement: the agreement to be executed by the City in favor of the Lender pledging and assigning its .interests in the Loan Agreement to the Lender; Princi al Balance: so much of the principal sum on the Note as remains unpaid at any time; Project: that certain 59 unit rental apartment facility Pro ' J ec t and re 1 ated improvements and equipment (including ui ment which are_ required by the Loan Agreement and the Eq. P � d installed on the Disbursing Agreement to be constructed an Project Premises, together with all additions to, replacements of, an d substitutions. for, any of the foregoing which may be made as permitted; Project Equipment: any and all (i) f ixtures or tangible personal property now or hereafter atta ched or affixed to the Pr tures owned y Project Premises, but specifically excluding any trade f ix- ' � wned b tenants, if any, (ii) other tangible personal property now or hereafter located within or used in connection with the Project and acquired, in whole or part, from Note 1 described in Exhibit B pr oceeds (which items are general y attached to the Loan Agreement), and (iii) any additions to, replacements of and substitutions for any of the foregoing which may be permitted or required by the Loan Agreement; Project Premises: the real property and any other easements and rights described in Exhibit A attached to the Loan Agreement; Replacement cement Credit: a letter of credit provided by the Company pursuant to Section 4.07 of the Loan Agreement o P Y P replace or supplement a prior Credit; Resolution: this Resolution of the City adopted April 20 1989, together with any supplement or amendment thereto; 3 Title: Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company; All references in this instrument to designated "Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the designated Article Sections and subdivisions of this desig .s ' instrument as originally executed. The words "herein," hereof " and "hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to this Resolution.as a whole not to any particular Article, Section or subdivisi.on. 1 -2. Legal Authorization. The City is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and is authorized under the Act, to initiate the Project herein referred to, and to issue and sell the Note for the ur ose, in the manner and upon the terms and conditions P P set forth in the Act and in this Resolution. 1.3. Findings. The City Council has heretofore determined, and does hereby determine, as follows: (1) the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended, to issue its revenue note to finance, in whole or in part, the costs of a multifamily rental housing development (the "Project ") for the public purposes expressed in the Act; (2) the Issuer has made the necessary arrangements with Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited 9 P partnership (the "Company "), for the acquisition, P of the Project, cwhich will be installation, and construction of the character and accomplish the purposes provided by the Act; 3 the Issuer has agreed to issue its $2,230,000 Multifamily ousing Revenue Bonds, Series 1989 (Cottages of Y ) Maplewood Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) (the "Bonds" P ) and loan the P roceeds thereto to the Company pursuant to the terms of a loan agreement dated as of May 1, 1969 between the C it y and the Company the "Bond Loan Agreement ") to finance a P Y ( portion of the costs of the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; Jo (4) the Issuer has also agreed to agreement with the Company (in the form as hereinafter defined) which provides 4 enter into a revenue of the Loan Agreement for the Issuer to finance a portion of the costs of the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project by making a loan (the "Loan" to the Company to be funded through the issuance of a Multifamily Housing Revenue Note, Series 1989 (Cottages of Maplewood Project), in the aggregate principal amount of $264,000 (the "Note "); the amount estimated to be necessary to finance the (5) estimated costs costs of the Project, including the costs and es i P Y ermitted b Section 469.157 of the Act, in addition to the issuance of the Bonds and other moneys to be contributed by the Company, will require the issuance of the Note in the principal al amount of $264,000 as hereinafter provided; 6 it is desirable, feasible and consistent with the objects ects and purposes of the Act to issue the .Note, for the � p purpose of financing a portion of the cost s of the Project; 7 under the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Company has agreed to the repayment of the sums borrowed pursuant thereto; (8) in connection with the issuance of the Note and the Bonds, the Company will enter into a Regulatory Agreement dated as of May 1, 1989 with the Issuer and Bond Trustee (the "Regulatory Agreement") and will execute a Declaration of g Y g Restrictive Covenants dated as of May 1, 1989 (the Declaration" relating to compliance with certain federal, state and local requirements applicable to the Project; (9) to provide additional security for the repayment of the Note, Mid America Bank Maplewood, a state banking corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, has agreed to issue its Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit ( the "Initial Credit ") to secure the payment of the principal and interest on the Note; and the Note and the interest accruing thereon do not (10) � meaning of constitute an indebtedness of the City within the g any constitutional or statutory limitation and do not constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the City and • neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing powers of the City is pledged for the payment of the Note or interest thereon. 5 1 -4. Authorization and Ratification of Project. The City as heretofore and does hereby. authorize • y the Act and the Company, in accordance with the provisions. of subject tot among, other things, the terms and conditions set . forth in the Disbursing Agreement, to provide for the construction and installation of the Project pursuant to the Plans I and y Specifications b such means as shall be available P an .to the Company and in the manner determined by the Company, and without advertisement for bids as may be required for the construction and acquisition. of municipal facilities; and the .City hereby ratifies, affirms, and approves all actions heretofore taken by the Company consistent with and in anticipation of such authority and in compliance with the Plans and Specifications* 6 ARTICLE TWO NOTE 2 -1. Authorized Amount and Form of Note The Note issued pursuant to this Resolution shall in substantial l the form be y rm set_ forth herein, with such appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as are permitted or required by this Resolution ' with the. , and in accordance further provisions hereof* and the t "otal rinci P pal amount of the Note that 6 may be outstanding hereunder is expressly limited to $264,000, unless a duplicate p Note is issued pursuant to Section 2 -70 The Note shall be in substantially the following form: 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Multifamily Housing Revenue Note, Series 1989 (Cottages of Maplewood Project) S FOR VALUE RECEIVED the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Ramsey County, Minnesota, (the "City ") hereby promises.to pay in , Minnesota, its successors or registered assigns (the "Lender "), from the i source and n the . manner hereinafter provided, the principal sum of AND /100 DOLLARS $ ), or so much thereof as remains unpaid from time to time ( the "Principal Balance"), with interest thereon at the rate of _ percent %) per annum, in any coin or currency which at the time or times of payment is legal tender for the payment of public or P rivate debts in the United States of America, in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth. 1. The principal of and interest on this Note shall accrue and be payable as follows: (a) Interest. Interest on the Principal Balance of this Note shall accrue from and after the date of this Note and shall be payable on February 1, May 1, August 1 and November I of each year, (each an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing on August 1, 19890 (b) Principal. Installments of the Principal Balance of the Note shall mature on May 1, in the years and amounts set forth below: Payment. Date Amount 1994 $ 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2. In any event, the payments hereunder shall .sufficient to a all be • pay principal and interest due, as such principal and interest becomes due, and to a r to p ay any premium or service charge, at maturity, upon redemption, or otherwise. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a charged for the 360 day year,. but g actual number of days elapsed in a 365 day Y 3. Principal and interest and remium if service charge due he P � any, or any se g hereunder shall be payable at the principal office of the Lender, or at such other 1 designate in writing, P ace as the Lender may desi g tang. .4. This Note is issued by the City to provide Y P de funds to be loaned to the Company pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of May 1, 1989, by and between the City d Y' Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Company" ) to assist in the financing of g project. Use and operation a rental housing rat ' g • • p ion of the Project will be subject to certain requirements and tax covenants contained Agreement dated ned in a Regula- tory A g ted as of May 1, 1989, by and between among others, the City and the Company "Regulatory g Y Agreement ") and a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants dated as of May -1 1989, executed by the Company "Decla y• be rec Y "Declaration"), which will recorded as covenants running with the land and ' compliance with federal and state requiring requirements similar to those contained in the Regulator Agreement. y g t• This Note is further issued pursuant to and in full compliance with the Constitution and laws of the State o ' f Minnesota, particularly, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C and pursuant • of the City ouncil ' P nt to a resolution Y duly adopted on April 20, 1989 the *on") . 5. Capitalized terms used herein shall have following meanings and if the g not defined herein shall have the same meaning given them in the Note Resolution Agreement: or Loan A. "Bank" means Town and Country State Bank of Maplewood, in Maplewood, Minnesota or any subsequent uent entity, providing a Replacement Credit; B. "Credit" means the Initial Credit and any Replacement Credit; C. "Credit Agreement" means the agreement by and between the Lender and the Company, pursuant to which the terms under which the Lender may draw on a Credit are set forth D. "Initial Credit" means the irrevocable standby letter of credit issued by Town and Country respect ect P to the Note in an amount equal to the sum of (i) the outstanding principal amount of the Note, and (ii) 195 days interest thereon; E. "Replacement Credit" means a letter of credit issued to replace an existing Credit; and F. "Town and Country" means Town and Country State Bank of Maplewood, a Minnesota state banking corporation; 6, This Note is secured by a Pledge Agreement of even date herewith by the City to the Lender (the "Pledge Agreement") and by the Initial Credit issued by Mid America Bank Maplewood, which expires on The Company P Y is required, in accordance with the Loan Agreement, to provide the Initial Credit or a Replacement Credit, until the Final Maturity Date of the Note in an amount equal to the sum of i ( ) the outstanding Principal Balance of the Note, and (.ii) at least 195 days interest thereon. The Initial Credit or an be replaced Y Replacement Credit may ep aced upon satisfaction of the conditions. therefore stated in the Loan Agreement, The Lender .may draw on the Initial Credit or any Replacement Credit on the terms set forth in the upon Credit Agreement dated as of May 1, 1989, executed by the Company in favor of the Lender "Creel i t A the � Agreement") The proceeds of the Note are to be placed in the Construction Fund established P ursuant to the Resolution and the Disbursing Agreement (hereinafter referred to), and the disbursement of the proceeds of this Note from the Construction Fund is subject to the terms and conditions of a Disbursing Agreement of even date herewith amon g the City, tie Company and Commonwealth sand Title Insurance .Company (the "Disbursing Agreement "), 10 .7. The City, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby waives demand, presentment, protest and notice of dishonor; and to the extent permitted by law, the Lender .may extend interest and /or principal of or any service charge e or p remium due on this Note, including the Final Maturity Date, all without notice.to or consent of any party art liable hereon or thereon and without releasing any such art from such liability nd P y y whether or not as a result thereof the interest on the Note is no longer exempt from the federal income tax. In no event, however, may the Final Maturity Date be extended beyond thirty (30) years from the date hereof. 8. .This Note may not be prepaid prior to May 1, 1993._ Beginning on May 1 Y g g y , 19 9 3 , this Note may be prepaid in whole, but not in part, on May 1, 1993 upon Ym a ent of a P premium of two percent (2%). The premium f or Ym re a ent shall P P decrease one percent (1 %) on each May 1 thereafter. Beginning with May 1,1995 this Note g 9 y may be prepaid in whole but not in part, without premium. 9. This Note is also subject to prepayment, without premium, to the extent that there are any surplus sums held in the Construction Fund as provided under Section 6 of the Disbursing Agreement, 10. In the event of prepayment of this Note, the Lender shall apply any such prepayment against the applicable prepayment P remium if any, then against the accrued interest on the Principal Balance and finally g a ainst the final principal amounts due under the Note. The monthl y payments ents due under paragraph 1 hereof, shall continue to be due and payable in full until the entire Principal Balance and accrued interest on this Note have been paid regardless partial prepayment made hereunder./ 11. As pzovided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Note is only transferable upon the books . P of the City at the office of the Manager, by the Lender in person or by his agent dui authorized in writing, g, at the Lender's expense, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Manager, dui executed b the its Y Y Lender or duly authorized agent. Upon such transfer the Manager will note the date of registration g g stration and the name and address of the new registered Owner in the registration blank appearing The City t Y y ma de PP g below. Th em and treat the person in whose name i the Note s last registered upon the books of the City ith such registration noted o Y g n the Note, as the absolute owner 11 hereof, whether or not overdue, for the purpose of receiving payment of or on the account, of the Principal Balance, ...redemption price or interest and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to the Lender or upon his order shall be valid and effective to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Note to the extent. of the sum or sums so paid, and the City shall not be affected by any notice to the ,contrary. 12. All of the agreements, conditions, covenants, provisions and stipulations contained in the Resolution, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Credit Agreement, the.Regulatory Agreement, the Declaration and the Disbursing Agreement are hereby made a part of this Note to the same extent and with the same force and effect as if they were fully set forth herein. 13. This Note and interest thereon and any service charge or premium due hereunder are payable solely from the revenues and proceeds derived from the Loan Agreement and Credit Agreement, and do not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, are not payable from or a charge upon any funds other than the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, and do not give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or, to the extent permitted by law, of any of its officers, agents or employees, and no holder of this Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay this Note or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City, and this Note does not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, and the agreement of the City to perform or cause the performance of the covenant's and other provisions herein referred to shall he subject at all times to the availability of revenues or other funds furnished for such purpose in accordance with the Loan Agreement, sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof. 14. It is agreed that time is of the essence of this Note. If an Event of Default (as that term is defined in the Loan Agreement) shall occur, then the Lender shall have the right and option to declare, without prior notice of any kind, the Principal Balance and accrued interest thereon, immediately due and payable, whereupon the same, plus any premiums or service charges, shall be due and payable, but solely from sums made available under the Loan Agreement, the Credit Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement. Failure to 12 exercise such option at any time shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the same at any subsequent time. 15. The remedies of the Lender, as provided herein and in the Credit Agreement, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, are not exclusive and shall be cumulative and concurrent and may be pursued singly, successively or together, at the sole discretion of the Lender r, may be exercised as often as occasion therefor Y Shall occur; and the failure to exercise any such right or remedy shall in no event be construed as a waiver I or release thereof. 16. The Leader shall not be deemed, by any act of omissi on or commission, to have waived any of its rights or remedies hereunder unless such waiver is in writing and signed �. by the Lender and, then only to the extent specifically set forth in the writing. A waiver with reference to one event shall not be construed as continuing or as a bar to or waiver of any right or remedy as to a subsequent event. .17. This Note has been issued without registration under state or federal or other securities laws, pursuant to an exemption for such issuance; and accordingly the Note may riot be assigned or transferred in whale or part, nor may a participation interest in the Note be given pursuant to any participation agreement, except in accordance with an applicable exemption from such registration requirements* rements. 18. It is recognized that the obligations of the n PY Com a are non - recourse obligations to the extent provided in Section 6.08 of the Loan Agreement. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all conditions acts and things required to exist, happen and be performed P recedent to or in the issuance of this Note do exist have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as required by law. 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Note to be duly executed in its name by the manual signatures of the Mayor and Manager and has caused the corporate seal to be affixed hereto, and has caused this Note to be dated May 1, 1989. Attest: Manager (SEAL) CITY OF MAPLEW04D, MINNESOTA 14 Mayor PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the unpaid this Note and the interest accruing t; p the books of the City of Maplewood in last noted below. Date of Name and address Registration Registered Owner 1989 15 Principal Balance of hereon is registered on the name of the holder Signature of Manager 2 -2. The Initial Note. The Note shall be dated as of the date of delivery, shall be payable at the times and in the manner, shall bear interest at the rate, and shall be subject to such. other terms and conditions as are set forth therein. 2 -3. Execution. The Note shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures'of its Mayor and Manager and shall be sealed with the seal of the City. In case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Note, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if had remained in office until delivery. In the event of the absence or disability of the Mayor or the Manager such of f icers of the City as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf, shall without further act or authorization of the City Council execute and deliver the Note. 2-4. Delivery of initial Note. Before delivery of the Note there shall be filed with the Lender (except to the extent waived by the Lender) the following items: (1) an executed copy of each of the following documents: (A) the Loan Agreement; (B) the Pledge Agreement; (C) the Initial Credit; (D) the Credit Agreement; (E) the Disbursing Agreement; (F) the Regulatory Agreement; (G) the Declaration; (2) an opinion of Counsel for the Company as prescribed by Bond Counsel; 16 (3) the opinion of Bond Counsel as to the validity and tax exempt status of the Note; (4) such other documents and opinions as Bond Counsel may reasonably require for purposes of rendering its opinion required in subsection (3) above or that the Lender may reasonably require for the closing. 2 -5. Dis osition of Note Proceeds. (1) There is hereby established a Construction Fund to be held by Title as a separate account of the City as provided in the Disbursing Agreement. Upon delivery of the Note to Lender, the proceeds of the Note shall be credited to the Construction Fund held by Title on behalf of the City, at which time the entire principal amount of the Note shall be deemed advanced, and Title shall, on behalf of the City, disburse funds from the Construction Fund for payment of Project Costs upon receipt of such supporting documentation as .Title may deem reasonably necessary, including compliance with the provisions of the Disbursing Agreement. Title or the Company shall provide the City with a full accounting of all funds disbursed for Project Costs. (2) Any surplus in the Construction Fund shall be applied towards the prepayment of the Note as provided in the Disbursing. Agreement. and shall not be invested to produce a yield greater than the yield on the Note, as required by Internal Revenue Service Revenue Procedure 79 -51 Revenue Procedure 81 -22 and 26 CFR 601.201 (and any subsequent amendments, modifications or replacements thereof); provided that, if the Lender receives an opinion of Bond Counsel that the exemption from federal income taxation of interest on the Notes will not be jeopardized, the surplus funds may be invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Note. 2 -6. Registration of Transfer. The City will cause to be kept at the office of the Manager a Note Register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, the City shall provide for the registration of transfers of ownership of the Note. The Note shall be initially registered in the name of the Lender and shall be transferable upon the Note Register by the Lender in person or by its agent duly authorized in writing, upon surrender of the Note together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Manage-, duly executed by the Lender or its duly authorized agent. The following f orm of assignment shall be sufficient for said purpose. 17 For value received hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Note.of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer said Note on the books of said City with full power of substitution in the premises. The undersigned certifies that the transfer be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 2 -9. Dated: Registered owner Upon such transfer the Manager shall note,the date of registration and the name and address of the new Lender in the Note Register and in the registration blank appearing on the Note. 2 -7. Mutilated, Lost or Destroyed Note. In case any Note issued hereunder shall become mutilated or be destroyed or lost, the City shall, if not then prohibited by law, cause to be executed and delivered, a new Note of like outstanding principal amount, number and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of such mutilated Note, or in lieu of and in substitution for such Note destroyed or lost, upon the Lender's paying the reasonable expenses and charges of the City in connection therewith, and in the case of a Note destroyed or lost, the filing with the City of evidence satisfactory to the City with indemnity satisfactory to it. If the mutilated, destroyed or lost Note has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Note prior to payment. 2 -8. Ownership of Note. The City may deem and treat the person in whose name the Note is last registered in the Note Register and by notation on the Note whether or not such Note shall be overdue, as the absolute owner'of such Note for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of the Principal Balance, redemption price or interest and for all other purposes whatsoever, and-the City shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary. W 2-9. Limitat ion on Note Transfers. The Note has been issued without registration under state or other securities laws, pursuant to an exemption for .such issuance; and accordingly the Note may not be assigned or transferred in whole or art, nor may a participation interest tra P in the Note be given pursuant to any participation agreement, exce P t in accordance with an applicable exemption from such registration requirements. 2 -10. Issuance of New Notes. Subject to the provisions of Section 2 -9, the City shall at the request and expense of the Lender, issue a new note in aggregate outstanding principal amount equal to that of the Note surrendered, and of like tenor except as to principal al amount and registered in the name of the Lender or .such transferee as may be designated by the Lender. 19 ARTICLE THREE GENERAL COVENANTS 3 -1. Payment of Princil2al and Interest. The City covenants that it. will promptly pay or cause to be paid the principal of and interest on the Note at the place, on the dates, solely from the source and in the manner provided herein and in the Dote. The principal and interest are payable solely from and secured by revenues and proceeds derived from the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Credit Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, which revenues and proceeds are hereby specifically pledged to the Y a ment thereof in the manner and to the extent specified P in the Note, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Disbursing Agreement and the Credit Agreement; and nothing in the Note or in this Resolution shall be considered as assigning, pledging or otherwise encumbering any other funds or assets of the City. 3-2. Performance of and Authority for Covenants* The City covenants that it will faithfully perform at all times any and all covenants, undertakings, stipulations and provisions contained in this Resolution, in the Note executed authenticated and delivered hereunder and in all proceedings of the City Council pertaining. thereto; that it is duly authorized under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota including particularly and without limitation the Act, to issue the Note authorized hereby, pledge the revenues and assign the Loan Agreement in the manner and to the extent set forth in this Resoluti.op, the Dote, the Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement; that all action on its part for the issuance of the Note and for the execution and delivery thereof has been duly and effectively taken; and that the Note in the hands of the Lender is and will be a valid and enforceable special limited obligation of the City according to the terms thereof. 3-3. Enforcement and Performance of Covenants. The City agrees to enforce all covenants and obligations of the Company under the Loan Agreement and Disbursing Agreement, upon request of the Lender and being indemnified to the satisfaction of the Authority for all expenses and claims arising therefrom, and to perform all 20 covenants and other provisions pertaining to the City contained in the Note, the Loan 'Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, subject to the provisions of Section 3 -4-hereof. 3 -4. Nature of Security. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Note, the .Credit Agreement, the Disbursing Agreement, the Loan ,Agreement, the Pledge Agreement or any other document referred to in Section 2 -4 to the contrary, under the provisions of the Act, the Note may not be payable from or be a charge upon any funds of the City other than the revenues and proceeds pledged to the payment -thereof, nor shall. the City be subject to any liability thereon, nor shall the Note otherwise contribute or give rise to a pecuniary liability of the City or, to the extent permitted by law, any of the City's officers, employees and agents. No holder of the Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Note or the interest thereon,. or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City other than the revenues pledged under the Pledgee Agreement; and the Note shall not constitute a_ charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City; and the Note shall not constitute a debt. of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; but nothing in the Act impairs the rights of the Lender to enforce the covenants made for the security thereof as provided in this Resolution, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement, the Credit Agreement, the Disbursing Agreement and in the Act, and by authority of the Act the City has made the covenants and agreements herein for the benefit of the Lender; provided that in any event, the agreement of the City to perform or enforce the covenants and other provisions contained in the Note, the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues under the Loan Agreement suf ficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof, and the City shall not be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability thereon. 3 -5. Preservation of Tax Exempt Status of the Note. (1) In order to preserve the tax exempt status of the Note, the City covenants that it shall take such actions as are required and within its reasonable control to prevent the interest on the Note from becoming taxable for federal income tax purposes for the owners thereof (other than any owner who is a "substantial user" or "related person thereto" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code) including but 21 ot limited to all actions taking required of it under Section a q 148 of the Code. To this end, the City shall: se the Company {A} cause p Y to maintain records • "gross attributable to the Note, the identifying all yield at which proceeds" g P d arbitrage such gross proceeds are investe any . profit derived ved theref rom, and any earnings derived f rom ,the investment of such arbitrage profit; (B) make and maintain on file all annual determinations of the amount, if any, of excess arbitrage required to be rebated to the United States; (C) rebate to the united States at least once every to be required rebated five years the to the Unite d amount, if any, which is States including the last instalment which � shall be made no later than 60 days after the day on which the Note is paid in full; not invest "gross proceeds" in any acquired (n) g ur arbitrage non P P ose obligations so as to otherwise ,� payable to the United States as a "prohibited payment to a third party; n from investing " (E) refrain g any "gross proceeds. allocable to the Note in acquired nonpurpose obligations at a excess of the yield on the Note to the extent such y ield in exce Y gross proceeds exceed in any calendar year more than 150 of ..the debt ser vice requirements uirements for the Note n that calendar year; and (F) retain on file all records of the annual determination of the rebate amount until six (6) years after the retirement of the Note., 22 ARTICLE FOUR MISCELLANEOUS 4 -1. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution shall be held or deemed to be or shall, in fact, be inoperative or unenforceable as applied in any particular case in any jurisdiction or jurisdictions or in all jurisdictions or in all cases because it conflicts with any provisions of any constitution or statute or rule or public policy, or for any other reason, such circumstances shall not have the effect of rendering the provision in question inoperative or unenforceable in any other case or circumstance, or of rendering any other provision or provisions herein contained invalid, inoperative, or unenforceable to any extent whatever. The invalidity of any one or more phrases, sentences, clauses or paragraphs in this Resolution contained shall not affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. 4 -2. Authentication of Transcript. The officers of the City are directed to furnish to Bond Counsel certified copies of this Resolution and all documents referred to herein, and affidavits or certificates as to all other matters which are reasonably necessary to evidence the validity of the Note. All such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute recitals of the City as to the correctness of all statements contained therein. 4 -3. Registration of Resolution. The City Manager is authorized and directed to cause a copy of this Resolution to be filed with the County Auditor of Ramsey County, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Note as a bond of the City has been duly entered upon his bond register. 4 -4. Authorization to Execute Agreements. The forms of the proposed Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement, are hereby approved in substantially the form heretofore presented to the City Council, together with such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, 23 deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate ro riate and approved by Bond Counsel prior to the execution of the documents, and the Mayor and Manager of the City are.authorized to execute the Loan Agreement, the. Pledge Agreement and the Disbursing Agreement in the name of and on behalf of the City and such other documents as Bond Counsel consider appropriate in connection with the issuance of the Note. In the event of the absence or disability of the Mayor or the Manager such officers of. the City as in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf, shall without further act or authorization of the City Council do all things and execute all instruments and documents required to be done or executed by such absent or disabled officers. The execution of an y instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of. the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. Attest: Manager Adopted: April 20, 1989 Mayor of the City of Maplewood 24 591A Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular .meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 20th clay of august, 1989, at o'clock P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1989 TO FINANCE A PROJECT AND PROGRAM THEREFORE AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT- - FHA.INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN) The motion for the adoption of the * foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 1989 TO FINANCE A PROJECT AND PROGRAM THEREFORE AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT -- FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN) BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 11 The Council has previously received a proposal from Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership, a Minnesota 9 P limited artnershi (the "Company ") that the City of Maplewood P P (the "City) undertake a multifamily housing. development to finance a portion of the costs of a certain program �' residential rental project as herein described, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act "), through the issuance by the City of its $2,230,000 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds Series 1989 (Cottages of Maplewood Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) (the "Bonds ") and in accordance with a Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement" between the City and the Company, and, Juran and Moody, Inc. (the "Bond Purchaser "). 2, The Company desires to construct on certain real estate owned by it and located in the City, a 59 -unit multifamily housing rental facility (the "Project ") . The Project provide will rental housing to low and moderate income persons as described below) and to elderly persons and will otherwise further the policies and purposes of the Act. Public hearings on the Project and the financing program therefor were duly held by the City Council on December 14, 1987 and November 14, 1988. The findings made in the Preliminary Resolution adopted by this City Council on December 14 19.87 with respect to the Project, the Bonds and the Note are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved. 3. It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan Agreement to be dated as of May 1, 1989, between the City as Lender and the Company as Borrower (the "Loan Agreement "), the City loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to finance in P art the costs of the Project. The Basic Payments to be made by the Company under the Loan Agreement are. fixed so as to produce revenue sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, interest ors, and the purchase price of, the i Bonds when due. It is further proposed that the City assign its rights to the Basic Payments and certain other rights under the Loan Agreement to American National Bank and Trust Company, a national banking association located in St-Paul, Minnesota the "Trustee ") as security for payment of the Bonds under an Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1, 1989 between the City and the Trustee (the "Indenture " ). -2- 4. The operation and occupancy of the Project will be subject to the terms and conditions of a Regulatory Agreement dated as of May 1, 1989, between the City, the Trustee and the Company (the "Regulatory Agreement ") and a Declaration of Restri.ctive Covenants (the "Declaration" ) dated as of Ma y 1 , 1989 , executed by the Company and recorded as covenants and restrictions running with the land on which the Project is to be located. The Bond Proceeds loaned pursuant to the Loan Agreement will be used to fund a mortgage loan made to the Company to finance the acquisition, construction m P Y and installation of the Project, which mortgage loan will be insured by the Federal Housing Administration ( "FHA ") of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ( "HUD ") as further described in the official Statement (as defined below) and to fund a reserve fund* 5., The City and the Company will enter into a Development Agreement dated /as of April 1, 1989 (the P g "Development Agreement ") relating to certain tax increment P g financin g assistance to be granted by the City to the Project. 60 This Council, by action taken on December 14, 1987, g ave preliminary approval ( the "Preliminary Resolution ") to the proposal for the Project and the financing program therefor. The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has given approval to the proposed financing program for the Project by -3- issuing its nonre'ection letter under the Act. The City i g � obtained allocation of Bonding Authority pursuant to Chapter 4 7 4A . 0 91 on or about November 28, 1988 and filed a Carry -forward orward Election for such allocation on December 22, 1988 ( ) under section 146 f of the internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended* The f indin g s of the City Council of the City ma de in the Preliminary Resolution with respect to the .Project are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved. 7. Forms of the following documents relating to the Bonds have been submitted for review to the City Attorney and to the City Council for approval: (a) the Loan Agreement; (b) the Indenture; (c) the Regulatory Agreement, (d) the Declaration (not executed by the city ) ; (e) the Bond Purchase Agreement; (f) the Development Agreement; and {q} The Preliminary Official Statement (not executed by the City). 8. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) the Project described in the Loan Agreement and Indenture referred to above constitutes a -4 - Project authorized by the Act and the financing program for the Project is authorized by the Act; (b) the purpose of the Project and the ro . financin g P g ram for the Project is, and the effect thereof will be, to promote the public welfare by the construction, installation and equipping of a rental housing facility for assisting persons of low income and elderly persons within the City Y to obtain decent, safe and sanitary g housin at rentals they can afford; (c ) the Project is to be located within the City limits, at a site which is easily accessible to persons residing within the City and the surrounding communities; (d) the construction and installation of the Project, the issuance and sale of the Bonds the execution and delivery by the City of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Regulatory. Agreement, the Bond. Purchase Agreement and the Development Agreement (collectively, the "Agreements"), and the performance of al l covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Agreements, and of all other acts and things required under the constitution and laws of the -5- State of Minnesota to make the Agreements and the Bonds valid and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act; (e) it is desirable that the Company be authorized, in accordance with the provisions of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement, the Regulatory Agreement and the Declaration (which terms and conditions the City determines to be necessary, desirable and proper), to construct and instal. the Project by such means as shall be available to the Company and in the manner determined by the Company, and with or without advertisement for bids as required for the acquisition and installation of municipal facilities (f) it is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture; (g) the Basic Payments under the Loan Agreement are fixed to produce revenues su #ficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal al of, premium, if any, interest on, and _6- the P urchase price of, the Bonds issued under the Indenture when due, and the Loan Agreement, Regulatory Agreement, Declaration and Indenture also provide that the Company is required to pay all ex enses of the operation and w-i intenance o f the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all 1 iabi l ity for injury to pens onr or property arisin g from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project Premises (as defined in the Indenture) and payable during the term of the Loan , A reement Regulatory Agreement, Declaration � g and Indenture; and (h) under the provisions oz minne5vLa Statutes, Section 462C.07, and as provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from or charged upon any funds other than the revenues pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any liability thereon; no holder of any Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay any of the Bonds or the interest or premium thereon, or to enforce -7- payment thereof against any property of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under the-Indenture; the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds shall recite that the Bonds are issued without moral obligation on the part of the state or its political subdivisions, and that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof; and the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City or its political subdivision within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 91 The City hereby elects to have Section 142(d)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (requiring that 40 percent or more of the rental units in the Project be occupied by tenants whose units in the Project be occupied by tenants whose income is 60 percent or less of or a median gross income (adjusted for family size) apply to the Bonds. fflem 10 . Subject approval to the a roval of the City Attorney and the provisions of paragraph ara h 14 hereof, the forms of the p Agreements and exhibits thereto and all other documents • hereof are described in paragraph 7 her approved substantially in the form submitted and on file in the office of the City Managers with such subsequent changes as may be approved by i q City Attorney. the City and the C y . The Agreements, in Y • submitted are directed to be executed substantially the form , Y Y the Mayor and the or of the City b in the name and on behalf City Managers n other documents and certificates necessary g er. Y to the transaction herein described shall be executed by the ' officers. Copies of all of the documents appropriate City P .necessary to the transaction ion herein described shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided herein and in the Loan Agreement and Indenture. The City hereby authorizes the use and �.1 y Y circulation • on by the Bond Purchaser of an official Statement in connection with the offer and sale of the Bonds. The City � hereby finds that the • information contained in the section of • Statement captioned "the Issuer" does the Preliminary official ial Sta p not contain any untrue statement and hereby approves In substantiall • y the form submitted to the City Council at this meeting such information for inclusion in the official Statement, and the City hereby . ereb ratifies, confirms and consents -9- 4 to the use of said section in the official Statement in 'on with the sale of the Bonds. The City has not connects prepared nor mad e an y independent endent investigation of the information contained in the Preliminary official Statement (other than the section therein captioned "the Issuer") and takes no responsibility for such information . 12. The Bonds shall be bear interest at a rate or to exceed ten percent (10%) per annum established rates, .not P by the Company,, the Bond Purchaser and the Pricing Committee hereinafter referred to. There is hereby appointed a Pricing is hereby delegated Committee to which y the power and authority g to agree with the Company and Bond Purchaser on.the interest i P Y rates for each maturity. The Mayor and City.Manager are y y hereby appointed b the City to the Pricing Committee, with full P ower and authority to bind the City, subject to the limitations stated herein. 13. T he Cit y shall P roceed forthwith to issue its Bonds in the form and upon the terms set forth in the .Indenture* The Bonds shall mature on the dates as set forth in the Indenture. The • offer of the Bond Purchaser to purchase the Bonds at percent � %) of their principal amou nt plus accrued interest to the date of p liver is hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Manager are delivery Y P authorized and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds as -10- t prescribed in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication and delivery to .. the .Bond ,Purchaser . 14. The Mayor and City Manager and other appropriate officers of the City are authorized and directed. to prepare and furnish to the Bond Purchaser certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the f acts relating to the legality of `the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 15. The approval hereby given to the Agreements and the various other documents referred to in paragraphs 7 and 10 above includes approval of (a) such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by Bond Counsel, the City Attorney and the City officials authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution and (b) such additional documents, agreements or certificates as may be necessary and appropriate in connection with the Agreements -11- and with the -issuance and sale of the Bonds and approved by Bond Counsel, the City Attorney and City officials authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and said City Attorney and City of ficial.s are hereby authorized to approve said changes or additional documentsr agreements or certificates on behalf of the City. The. execution of any Instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms thereof and hereof. In the absence (or inability) of the Mayor or City Clerk or City Manager, any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed by them may be executed by the Acting Mayor or the Acting City Manager, respectively. 16. It is understood and agreed that the Company shall indemnify the City against all liabilities, losses, damages, costs and expenses (including attorney's fees and expenses incurred by the City) arising with respect to the -12- t ' e Bonds, as rovided for and agreed to by and Project or th 8 , p 't in the Loan Agreement and the between the Company and the City Bond Purchase Agreement. Passed: April 20, 19890 Mayor Attest City Mayor. e -13- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the authorization of the issuance of the $2,230,000 Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Cottages of Maplewood Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan), Series 1989. day of (SEAL) WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 1989, City Clerk -14- Action by Council -1 Endorsed Modified,...-, Date AGENDA NUMBER � 3 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM City Manager �j%r -°-� RE: REVIEW OF ORDINANCES DATE, May 1, 1989 The Council requested that we begin reviewing the Code book and below is a partial listing of one's we should review first. Please think of others you would like reviewed and add them to this list, as well as the order in which they should be discussed. 1) R -3 Districts 2) Gambling 3) Liquor 4) Kennel License 5) Ordinances Relating to Crimes 6) Animals and Fowl 7) Nuisance Ordinance $) Noise Ordinance 9) 10) MAM:kaz There is no report for this item. AGENDA ITEM ' — � Action by Council: Endorsed--....... Modified'............ ............ . Rej ected,,...... Date AGENDA rrEM Al - / AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: Endorsed...-. 'TO: City Manager Modified Rejecter FROM: Assistant City Engineer fat SUBJECT: Walter Street-Fenton to Frost, Project 84-14.....- men t Hearing DATE s., Apr i 1 28, 1989 The assessment record book +or the sLtbiect project is enclosed. A resolution adopting the assessment roll is attached, BAI iw Attachment � RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Walter Street--Fenton to Frost as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 84-14, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOO, MINNESOTA: l. Such proposed assessment, as amended; a coy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named there/in� and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement int he amount of the assessment levied against it" 2" Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of twenty years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine (9"0) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31' 1989" To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3" It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessment,s on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting om-� the o improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4" To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council; as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420"051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements" 5^ The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended don the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other, municipal taxes" TO: FROM RE: DATE: INTRODUCTION City Manager Finance Director AGENDA REPORT r,4&' '. I - ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT FOR AND AMENDMENT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR THE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD May 1, 1989 AGENDA NO.— N -2 fiction by Councils; Endorsed Modified, Rejected Da t MAPLEWOOD CROSSING PLAN A public hearing is needed along with adoption of the attached resolution to capture the tax increment from the Maplewood Crossing development. This will rovide the capability p for issuance of tax increment bonds in the future to finance publ i c works improvements, ark development and a community center. Council approval p • pp at a later date will be required to issue bonds and proceed with construction of any projects. BACKGROUND On January 11, 1988 the City Council established the tax increment district for the Cottages of Maplewood. Also, the Council approved the use of art of the tax increment $275,000 a ment t p meet to provide a payment o the developer for land acquisition and on -site improvements. There • s $276,484 of additional tax increment p ement bonding capability from this development available for other City projects. The resolution attached amends the Development Program p g am to indicate that the additional tax increment will be used for City Projects, On March 27, 1989 the City Council approved the concept of using he tax increment Maplewood ewood Cross i n Bevel 9 ment from the • p g development for a community center and park improvements. Since the tax increment district must be established before a bui l ding ermi t i s issued Council p � unc�l action on this matter is needed on May 8th as commencement of construction on this ' roect is imminent. The tax increment bondin g capability p � from this development will finance $2,530,578 of City project costs. The resolution attached will capture the tax increment from the Maplewood Crossing d evelopment, After a tax increment district is created, the City has the capability to modi fy the Development Program which specifies the amount of tax increment bonds to be issued and the projects that they will be used for. Therefore, adoption of the attached resolution solution will allow the City to use up to $2,807,062 of tax increment bonds proceeds ' • p for public works improvements, park development and a community center. Additional bonds totaling $11,228,248 could be sold in conjunction with this as only 20% of the total tax increment bonds sold need to be supported by tax increment revenues. The remaining 0% would have to b ' increases in the City's g e financed by property .tax levy. At a later date, the Council will be requested to allocate money t0 specific projects. . Adoption of the resolution will kee p open the option of using the tax increment from the Maplewood crossing development for Cit y projects. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached resolution to rovide the he capabil�' ty for issuance of tax increment bonds which use the remaining tax increment on the Cottages gs of Maplewood and the tax increment for the Maplewood Crossin g development, ment. DFF :1nb 556X EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA HELD: MAY 8, 1989 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly held on the 8th day of May, 1989, at o'clock p.m. The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: . RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 AND ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM RELATING THERETO AND AMENDING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING TO HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 WHEREAS: A. It has been proposed that the City of Maplewood amend the tax increment financing. plan for Housing District No. 1 -3 and establish Economic Development District No. 1 -3 within Development District No. 1 and adopt a tax increment financing .plan and development program with respect thereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 9 469.179 and Sections 469.124 through 469.134 (collectively he Act ") • y B. The Council has investigated the facts and has caused ,to be prepared adevelopment program and proposed tax increment financing plans for the tax increment districts. C. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment and /or modification of the tax increment districts and the adoption of the ro osed P P rt development program and tax increment financing plans relating thereto including, A lating g but not limited to, notification of Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 622 and Special Intermediate School District No 916 having taxing over the ro ert to g property ,y be included in the tax increment districts, and the holding of a public hearing published and mailed notice as r g on P A lashed. required by law. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City ouncil follows* 11 of the City of Maplewood as f o y 1. Tax Increment District. There is established in the City of Maplewood within Development District istr act No . 1 a tax increment financing district to be known as "Economic Development District No. 1 -3." Economic Development District No. 1 -3 shall have the � p, in the tax increment financing plan relating thereto. 2. Development Program and T.ax Increment Financin Plan relating to Economic Development District No. 1 -3. The development program and the tax increment t financing plan are adopted as the development program and tax increment financing nc�ng plan for Economic Development District No. 1 -3 and the ' Council makes the following findings. City (a) Economic Development development district as defined 469.174 the specific basis for District No. 1 -3 is an economic in Minnesota Statutes, Section such determination being: Economic Development District No. 1 -3 is being created so that the tax increments derived therefrom can be used to fund the public improvements set forth in the development program which will stimulate additional development in Development District No. 1, thereby creating new jobs and expanding the A g City's tax base. (b) The proposed redevelopment in the opinion of the City Council would not A occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financin g is deemed necessary. The reasons supporting this finding are that: The development activities within Development District No. 1 to be financed by tax increment financing are not financeable using traditional methods of municipal financing. Private investment will not finance these development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these activities develop- ment through the use of tax increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will occur w' P • Rhin Development District No. 1. ( c ) The tax increment financing plan for Economic Development District No. 1-•3 conforms to the eneral la g plan for development or redevelopment of the City of Maplewood as a whole. P The reasons for supporting this finding are that: (i} Economic Development District No. 1 -3 is properly zoned; The tax increment financing plan will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's 's com rehensive plan. (d) The tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City of Maplewood as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Development District No. 1 b P y private enterprise. The reasons supporting this finding are that: As previously stated the development activities, consisting of public improvements, to be financed by tax increment financing are necessary so that additional commercial development by private enterprise can occur within Development District No. 1. 3. Tax Increment Financin Plan for Housing District No. 1 -3. The amended tax increment financing plan for Housing District No. 1- g P 3 is hereby adopted. The findings made by the City Council on January 11, 1988 with respect to the creation of Housing ist P g rlct No. 1 -3 are hereby ratified, confirmed and adopted. 4. Public Purpose. The development program and the adoption of the tax increment financing plan for Economic Development District No. 1 -3 conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up to provide employment opportunities to improve the tax base, and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. 5. Certification. The Auditor of Ramsey County is requested to certify the original gross tax capacity of Economic Development District No. 1 -3 as described in the tax increment financing plan, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original gross tax capacity has increased or decreased in accordance with the Act; and the City Manager is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within Economic Development District No. 1 -3 for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 6. Filing. The City Manager is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the development program and tax increment financing plan for Economic Development District No. 1 -3 with the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Develop - ment. 7. Administration. The administration of Develop- ment District No. 1 is assigned to the City Manager who shall from time to time be granted such powers and duties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.130 and 469.131 as the City Council may deem appropriate. 8. Notice of Public Hearing. The actions of City staff in causing the notice of public hearing to be published in the Maplewood Review are hereby ratified, confirmed and adopted. The motion f or - the adoption of the resolution was duly seconded by member upon vote being taken thereon, the following thereof: and the following voted against the same: foregoing and voted in f avor Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned,. being the dui ua y q lif ied and acting City Manager of the City f Y Maplewood, Minnesota, DO ..HEREBY CERTIFY. that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original there • thereof on file le In my office, and that the same is a full true and complete transcript of the minutes of ' a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated insofar as such minutes relate • to the modification of the tax increment financin g p lan for Housing Distric t ct No. 1 -3 and the establishment of Economic Development lopment District No. 1-3 in the City. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said ' City this day of 1989. (SEAL) City Clerk Ilk, 570M MLI: 4/25/89 RED-- L�D MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM for DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 (Zantigo and Maple Ridge Square) HOUSING DISTRICT N0. 1 -1 (Maple Rid e Apartments) HOUSING DIS RIOT NU. 1 -2 (Maple Ridge Estates Apartments) -- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 1 -2 (Mall Addition and Main Street Store) HOUSING DISTRICT N0. 1 -3 (Cottages of Maplewood) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 1 -3 (Maplewood Crossing) for CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA May 8, 1989 This document was drafted by: BRIGGS AND MORGAN 2200 First National Bank Building St, Paul, Minnesota 55101 4 �ti MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN Based upon the statutory authority described in the Modified Development Program attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the ur ose of fulfilling the � p p g e City s development objectives as set forth in the Modified Development Program, the City Council has created, established and designated Development District No. pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.126. The following municipal action was taken in connection therewith: October 28, 1985: The Program for Development District No. l was adopted by the City Council, June 23, 1986: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying the Project Costs, 1 September 28, 1987: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by enlargement of the geographic Project Area and increased Project Costs, January 11, 1988: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying the Project Costs, May 8, 1989: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying the Project Costs. The following municipal action was taken with regard to the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within Development District No. 1: Economic Development District No. 1 -1 (Zantigo and Maple Rid e October 28, 19 8 5 : The Tax Increment F inanc ing ' P 1 an for Economic Development District No. 1 -1 was adopted by the City Council. ,Tune 23, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District No. 1 -1 was modified. Housing District No. 1 -1 (Maple Ridge Apartments): October 28, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -1 was adopted by the City Council, ;w June 23, 19 8 6 : The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -1 was modified. Housing District No. 1 -2 (Maple Ridge Estates Apartments): October 28,___1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-2 was adopted by the City Council. June 23, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -2 was modified. Economic Development District No. 1 -2 (Mall Addition and Main Street Store): September 28, 1987: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District No. 1 -2 was adopted by the City Council, Housing District No. 1 -3 (Cottages of Maplewood): January 11j____1988: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -3 was adopted by the City Council, May 8, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -3 was modified by the City Council, Economic Development District No. 1 -3 (Maplewood Crossing): May 8, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District No. 1 -3 was adopted by the City Council. 2 SECTION I DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 1. 1 . Definitions. The terms defined below shall, for purposes of this Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan, have the meanings herein specified, unless the context otherwise specifically requires; "C" means the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota. The City has a Statutory City -Plan A form of government. "Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan submitted to the Metropolitan Council P ursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 473.173, which contains the objectives, policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City. "Council" means the City Council of the City, also referred to as the governing body. (See "Governing Body" below.) "Count" means the County of Ramsey, Minnesota. "Development District Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134 as amended and supplemented. "Development District" means Development District No. 1 in the City, which is created and established hereto ursuant to and in a i p accordance with the Development District Act, and s geographically described in Exhibit A. "Development Program" means this Development Program for Development District No. 1, initially adopted by the Council on October 28, 19 8 5 and modified on ,Tune 23, 19 8 6 , September 28, 1987, January 11, 1988 and May 8, 1989. As defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, Subd. 3, a development program is a statement of objectives of the City for improvement of a development district which contains a complete statement as to the public facilities to be constructed within the district, the open space to be created, 3 ,V the environmental controls to be applied, the ro osed reuse P P of private property and the proposed operations of the district after the capital improvements within the district have been completed. "Economic Develoment District" means a type of tax increment financing district which consists of any project, or portions of a project, not meeting the requirements found in the definition of redevelopment district or housing district, but which the City finds to be in the public interest because: (a) It will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state; or (b) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; or (c) It will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. "Governing Body" means the duly elected City Council as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125 Subd. 8. "Housing District" means a type of tax increment financing district which consists of a p ro ' J ect . or a portion . of a project, intended for occupancy, In part, by persons or families of low and moderate income, as defined in chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 11. "Municipal Industrial Development Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, as amended. "Municipality" means any city, however organized as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, Subd. 2. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Tax Increment Bonds" means any general obligation or tax increment bonds issued and to be issued by the finance the public costs associated with Development revenue City to 4 5� /A District No. 1 as stated in the Development Program and in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing within Development District No, 1. The term Tax Increment Bonds" shall also include any obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonds, "Tax Increment Financing District" means any tax increment financing district presently established or to be established in the future in Development District No. 1. "Tax Increment Financing Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended. "Tax Increment Financing Plan" means the respective Tax Increment Financing Plan for each Tax Increment Financing District located within the Development District. 1.2. Statement of Public Purpose. The Council (the "Council ") in and for the City of Maplewood, Minnesota the "City") has determined that there is a need for housing, development and redevelopment within the corporate limits of the City to provide employment opportunities, to enhance development opportunities for the private sector, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the City, the County of Ramsey and the State of Minnesota. It is found that there are certain parcels of property within the Development District which are potentially more useful, productive and valuable than is being realized under existing conditions, is less productive because of the lack of proper utilization, and, therefore, are not contributin g to the tax base of the City to their full potential. In addition, it is hereby found that there is a need for public improvements to encourage development. Therefore, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for improving the Development District of the City to provide impetus for private development, to maintain and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities as are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City. The Council has also determined that the proposed developments would not occur solely through private investment in the forseeable future; that the tax increment financing plans proposed herein are consistent with the Development Program; and that the tax increment financing plans will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of 5 i� the municipality as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Development District by private enterprise. The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives. 1.3. Statutory Authority. THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACT. The Development District Act, authorizes the City, upon certain public purpose findings by the Council, to establish and designate development districts within the City and to establish, develop and administer development programs in regard thereto, all for the purpose of creating funding for the financing of necessary activities and improvements within the City. In accordance with the purposes set forth in Section 469.124 of the Development District Act, the Council hereby establishes Development District No. 1, as described in Exhibit A, for the purposes of enhancing the environment in which existing businesses are located, thus helping to secure their continued existence and potential additional development within the City, and promoting new and on -going development in Development District No. 1, both of which will provide employment opportunities, improve the tax base of the City and contribute positively to the economy of the State. THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ACT. The Tax Increment Financing Act, provides the procedure for the establishment of tax increment districts for the use of tax increment financing authorized by the Development District Act for the funding of qualified public activities and improvements. Within the Development District, the City plans to establish three housing districts as the types of tax increment financing district described in Section 469.174, Subd. 11 for Housing District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1-2 and Housing District No. 1 -3 and plans to establish two economic development districts as the types of tax increment financing district described in Section 469.174, Subd. 12 for Economic Development District No. 1 -1 and Economic Development District No, 1 -2. 1.4 Statement of Need. The Development District is established by the City of Maplewood for the purpose of 0 rw promoting the redevelopment of existing commercial areas and the development.of new business opportunities within the community. The City has found that the area within the Development District has not realized its greatest development potential due to a variety of factors. Included in the development barriers identified by the City are: inadequate public improvements, improper land use and utilization, and lack of investment. The City has found that the creation of the Development District and the utilization of tax increment financing is needed to remove these barriers and to promote development of the community. 1,5 Statement of Objectives. The Council determines that it is necessary., desireable and in the public interest to establish the Development District in the City, pursuant to the authority of the Development District Act. The Council finds that the creation of the Development District is necessary to give the City the ability to meet certain public purpose objectives that would not be otherwise obtainable in the foreseeable future without intervention by the City in the normal development process. The City intends to satisfy the following objectives through the implementation of the Development Program: (a) To provide safe, decent, sanitary housing for all residents of the city and in particular low and moderate income residents. (b) To provide an adequate housing supply for all residents at a cost they can afford. (c) To provide housing choices for low and moderate income residents who find housing opportunities are not available to them because of economic conditions. (d) To provide project activities which will assist in making possible the construction of a planned apartment for low and moderate income residents, as well, as improving health, welfare and convenience of citizens residing in the Development District. (e) Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements,. 7 ly including recreational facilities, in the Development District, necessary for the orderly and beneficial development of the Development District and adjacent areas of the City and the provision of adequate City services to the City residents. (f) Promote and secure the prompt development of certain property in the Development District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use, in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with a minimum adverse impact on the environment, and thereby promote and secure the development of other land in the City. (g) Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the Development District and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby improving living standards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human resources in the City. (h) Secure the increase of property subject to taxation by the City, Independent School Districts Nos. 622 and 624, Ramsey County, and other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for governmental services and programs required to be provided by them. (i) Promote the concentration of new desirable residential, commercial, office, restaurant, and other appropriate development in the Development District so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with its accessibility and prominence in the City. (j) Encourage local business expansion, improvement and development, whenever possible. (k) Create a desirable and unique character within the Development District E 't l� through quality use design n new and remodeled alternatives and n .i g quality buildings, (1) Encourage and provide m axi mum opportunity for private redevelopment of f existi ng areas and structures which are compatible with the Development Program. ogram. 1.6 Boundaries of Development •- ent District. The area within the Development District is set forth in Exhibit A. 1.7 Develo ment Act' ' within the De lvltles. Development activities Development District must be financi • a ally feasible, marketable and be compatible tible with long -range develo pent strategies of the City. The following long-range recommendations represent the Options that satisfy community development for the Development District while taking advantage of opportunities which are currently available . The City will l l perform all project ac tivities pursuant to the statut e and in g s o , anticipates that the following may, but are not required to be undertaken: (a) The making of studies Planni • ' � ng, and informal activities relating to the Development Program. P (b) The implementation and adminis- tration of the Development Program. (c) The construction or reconstruction Of streets, sidewalk public S. utilities, and other P improvements including ut not limited to: g (i) the water and sewer Southlawn Drive County Road D; construction of improvements on from Beam Avenue (ii) the construction of water and sewer improvements on McKnight Road from Highway Avenue; g Y 36 to street, to street, Conway (iii) the construction of a w tower on Stillwater Road east of titer Sterling; D Y 1) (iv) the construction of water main on Hudson place; (v) the installation of traffic lights at Hazelwood Avenue and Southlawn Avenue on Beam Avenue. (vi) acquisition of land and improvement of Hazelwood Park located at County Road C east of Hazelwood Avenue; (vii) improvement of Playcrest Park located at Lydia Avenue and McKnight Road; (viii) acquisition and expansion of Harvest Park located at Hazelwood Avenue south of County Road C and North of Highway 36; (ix) the construction of water, street, sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements within an area North of Beam Avenue, South of the Northern City limit, ' East of Highway 61 and . West of White Bear Avenue;. (x) acquisition of the abandoned Burlington Northern railroad right of way running from Larpenteur Street to Highway 694; (xi) acquisition of the land that the Cottages of Maplewood will be developed on and the payment of certain site improvements for the Cottages of Maplewood project; (xii) acquisition and betterment of a city recreational facility. (d) The acquisition of property consistent with the objectives of the Development Program. 10 M (e) The preparation of property for use including demolition of structures, clearance of sites, placement of fill, and installation of utilities. (f) The resale of property to developers. (g) The provision of relocation assistance to businesses and homeowners as may be required by this Development Program. (h) The issuance of Tax Increment Bonds to finance public costs of the Development Program or to evidence the City's obligation to reimburse developers for all or part of the public costs of the Development Program incurred or to be incurred by it pursuant to a Development Agreement. (i) The use of tax increments derived from a Tax Increment Financing District within the Development District to pay debt service on Tax Increment Bonds or otherwise pay the public cost of the Development Program. 1.8 Payment of Public Cost. It is anticipated that the public cost of the Development Program will be paid primarily from the tax increments to be derived from the Development District, either directly or indirectly by payment of project eligible expenses, by reimbursement of Developers for items of public cost paid directly by developers, or by some combination of these methods. The City reserves the right to utilize special assessments, general property taxes, utility revenues, and other sources of revenue which the City may apply to pay the public cost. 1.9. Environmental Controls. The proposed Tax Increment Financing Districts within the Development District do not present significant environmental concerns. All municipal actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing environmental standards. 1.10 Park and Open Space to be Created. Park and open space within the Development District No. 1 will be created in 11 E accordance with the zoning and platting ordinances of the City. The City may I undertake the following park improvements: (a) the acquisition of 'land and improvement of Hazelwood Park located at County Road C east of Hazelwood Avenue; (b) the improvement of Playcrest Park located at Lydia Avenue and McKnight Road. (c) the acquisition and expansion of Harvest Park located at Hazelwood Avenue south of County Road C and North of Highway 36. l.11. Proposed Reuse of Property. The Development Program does not contemplate the acquisition of private property until such time as a private developer presents an economically feasible program for the reuse of that property. Proposals, in order to be considered, must be within the framework of the above cited goals and objectives, and must clearly demonstrate feasibility as a public program. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond and /'or other evidence or guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be available to repay the public cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It shall be the intent of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any land sale contract to which the City is a part. 1.12. Administration and Maintenance of Development District. Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the City Manager who shall serve as administrator of the Development District. The administrator will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of Section 469.131 of the Development District Act; provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the Council. No action taken by the administrator pursuant to the above - mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Council. 1.13. Rehabilitation. Owners of properties within the Development District will be encouraged to rehabilitate their properties to conform with the applicable state and local 12 codes and ordinances, as well as an of Properties any design standards. Owners • p ,p who purchase property within District from the City he Development. •Y may be required to rehabilitate their properties as condition of sale of land. The City well provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be available from federal, state or local sources. . 1.14. Relocation. No erson will • p 11 be displaced and have to be relocated as a result of the Development Program, Th City accepts its responsibility fo g e r pursuant to Section Providing for relocation 469.133 of the Development District Act, 1.15. Amendments. The City reserves the right to alter and amend the Development Program and the tax increment financing plans, subject to the provlsl • ons of state law regulating such action. The City • right to change t Y peclflcally reserves the g he size of the Development District Tax Increment Financing istrict- and the Development g -S, the public cost of the p Program and the amount of Tax Increment be issued to finance such cost Bonds to specified by following the procedures p in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4. 13 SECTION II TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 [Adopted October 28, 1985) [Modified June 23, 1986] 2.1 Statement of-Objectives. See Section I. Subsection 1.5, Development Program for Development District No. 1. 2.2 Development Program. See Section I. Subsection 1.3, Development Program for Development District No. 1. 2.3 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing T1i tri t"-t- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0, 1 -1 Economic Development District No. 1 -1 is made up of certain parcels located within Development District No. 1. The specific parcels contained in the Tax Increment District are described in Exhibit B. HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 Housing District No. 1 -1 is made up of certain parcels located within Development District No. 1. The specific parcels contained in Housing District No. 1 -1 are described in Exhibit C. HOUSING DISTRICT N0. 1 -2 Housing District No. 1-2 is made up of certain parcels located within Development District No. 1. The specific parcels contained in Housing District No. 1 -2 are described in Exhibit D. 2.4 Parcels to be Acquired. At this time the City does not intend to acquire and reconvey any parcels to specific developers of property within 14 1 the City. The City intends to acquire rights of way in connection with the construction of certain public improvements within the Development District. The City intends to acquire two parcels of land if it undertakes the expansion of Hazelwood Park, These parcels are described as follows: The Fee Owners of the north parcel are Bruce M. Mogren, Eugene F. Arndt, et al. Legal description: That part of the West 408.8 feet of the E� of the SE -1/4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey Co., Minn. lying North of the South 1,243.00 feet of said E� of the SE -1/4 and South of the North 912.00 feet of said E� of SE -1/4, according to the U.S. Govt. Survey thereof . Size: 4.11 acres. Fee Owners of the south property are Lawrence S. Dotte and Donald A. Kaanz, Trustees of the profit sharing trust of the Donlar Corp. and Contract Purchaser Eugene F. Arndt. Legal description: The North 400 feet of the South 1,243 feet of the West 408 feet of the SE -1/4, of the SE -1/4, Section 3, Township 29, Range 22 and The North 200 feet of the South 1, 0 4 3. feet of the East 510 feet of the West 558 feet of the SW -1/4 of the SE -1/4, of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, except the North 30 feet of the East 100 feet of the West 408 feet thereof, all in Ramsey Co., Minn. Size: 4.06 acres. 2.5 Development Activity in Development District No. 1 for which Contracts Have Been Signed. (a) Zantigo Restaurant on County Road is being developed by Zantigo Mexican Restaurants, Inc. on County Road D. West of White Bear Avenue. The contractor is William Kranz Construction and the cost of the project is $260,000. 15 r� '1 A, (� (b) Maple Ridge Square Shopping Center is being developed by Curt Johnson and ,doe Weis - Weis Builders, Inc. at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and White Bear Avenue. The contractor is Weis Builders and the cost of the project is $2,318,383. .(c) Maple Ridge Apartments is being developed by Podawiltz Development Company on County Road D, west of White Bear Avenue. The contractor is Avon Lumber Company, Inc. and the cost of the project is $2,800,000. (d) Maple Ridge Estate Apartments is being developed by Maple Ridge Development Corporation at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue. The contractor is Steve Haight Construction and the cost of the project is $3,999,000. 2.6 Other Specific Development Expected to Occur Within Development District No. 1. (a) the construction of Century Ridge Apartments on Century Avenue south of Battle Creek; (b) the construction of Hazel Ridge Apartments at the intersection of Hazelwood Avenue and County Road C; (c) the construction of Beaver Creek Apartments at the intersection of Ferndale and Ivy Street; (d) an expansion of Maplewood Mall; (e) the rehabilitation and renovation of Keller Lake .Shopping Center. It is anticipated that the above projects will be started within one year. 2.7 Estimated Cost of Project Costs and Supportive Data. The estimated costs of certain of the public improvements and park improvements set forth in the Development Program to be made within Development District No. 1 and financed by tax increments to be derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -1 Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 within Development.District No. 1 are $2,188,8700 16 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS & PARK IMPROVEMENTS [Section 1.7(c)(i) through (viii)] LEGAL FEES, PLANNING FEES, COSTS OF ISSUANCE & CONTINGENCY BOND DISCOUNT INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCREMENT TO FULLY FUND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST LESS INTEREST AND INCOME DURING CAPITALIZED INTEREST PERIOD EARNED AT 6% $2,188,870.00 $ 33,644.35 $ 47,310.00 $ 236,511.79 ($ 16,336.14) TOTAL AMOUNTS OF BONDS TO BE SOLD $2,490,000.00 SUPPORTIVE DATA FOR ESTIMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS OR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UNDER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ITEM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BASIS FOR ESTIMATE Estimates by City Staff Estimates of Project Costs for legal assistance, bond issuance costs, planning provided by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR The amount of capitalized interest TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCRE- will be equal to an amount suf- MENT TO FULLY FUND ficient to pay interest on the PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST Tax Increment Bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increments to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. 17 2.8 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. It is anticipated that Tax Increment Bonds in the amount of $ 2 , 4 9 0 , 000, wi.l l . be incurred with respect to this portion of Development District No. 1. 2.9 Sources of Revenue It is anticipated that the sources of revenue to pay the costs associated with Development District No. 1 are Tax Increment Bond proceeds, state -aid funds, special assessments and park funds, 2.10 Original Assessed Value and Fiscal Disparities. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO, 1 -1: The original assessed value of all taxable property in Economic Development District No. 1 -1 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1985 with respect to the assessed value of such property as of January 2, 1985, for taxes payable in 1986 is estimated to be $278,560. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 1, requires that the original assessed value in economic development districts be adjusted on an.annual basis. The rate of adjustment is equal to the average percentage increase in the assessed value of all property in the Economic Development District No. 1 -1 during the five years prior to certification. The rate of adjustment for the District is approximately 1.084 %. The City hereby elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause (b). HOUSING DISTRICT NO, 1 -1 The original assessed value of all taxable property in Housing District No. 1 -1 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1984 with respect to the assessed value of such property as of January 2, 1985, for taxes payable in 1985 is estimated to be $3,160. W018" HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 .The original assessed value of all taxable property in the Housing District No. 1 -2 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1985 with respect to the Assessed Value of such property as of January 2, 1985, for taxes payable in 1986 is estimated to be $37,440. 2.11 Estimated Captured Assessed Value. Each year the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1-1.,-Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 to calculate the tax increment payable to the City of Maplewood. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 above the original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after .the date the original assessed value was certified, the amount the original assessed value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court - ordered abatements. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO, 1 -1 Upon completion-of the development expected to occur within Economic Development District No. 1 -1 the City estimates the assessed value of the Property within Economic Development District No. 1 -1 to be $1,822,566. 19 The captured assessed value upon completion is expected to annually approximate $1,233,838..73. This amount will be captured for up to 8 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The city requests 72.8339% of the available increase in assessed value from Economic Development District No. 1 -1 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan (the.balance of the increase being used to pay the fiscal disparaties contribution of Economic Development Distruct No. 1 -1.). HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 Upon completion of the development expected to occur within Housing District No. 1 -1 the City estimates the assessed value of the property within Housing District. No. 1 -1 to be $794,750. The captured assessed value upon completion is expected to annually approximate $791,590. This amount will be captured for up to 25 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The City requests 100% of the available increase in assessed value from Housing District No. 1 -1 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan. HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 Upon completion of the development expected to occur within Housing District No. 1 -2 the City estimates the assessed value of the property within Housing District No. 1 -2. to.be $1,300,500. The captured assessed value upon completion is expected to annually approximate $1,263,060. This amount will be captured for up to 25 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The City requests 100% of the available increase in assessed value from Housing District No. 1 -2 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan. 2.12 Type of Tax Increment Financing District. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 1 -1 Pursuant.to Section 469.174, Subd. 12 of the Act, the City finds that Economic Development District No. 1 -1 qualifies as an "economic development district ": 20 1. Economic Development District No. 1 -1 does not meet the requirements to qualify as either a housing or a redevelopment district. 2.. The creation of Economic Development District No. 1 -1 is in the public interest because it will preserve and enhance the tax base of the City and it will result in increased employment within the City. HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -1: and HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2: Pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the Act, the City finds that Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 each qualify as a "housing district" because a portion of each project is intended for occupancy, in part, by persons of low and moderate income as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts. 2.13 Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0, 1 -1: The Act allows "economic development districts" to remain in existence for a period of 8 years from the receipt of the first tax increment or 10 years from the approval of the tax increment financing plan, whichever is less. Based on these limitations it is anticipated that Economic Development District No. 1 -1 will remain in effect until eight years from the receipt of the first tax increment. HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -1: and HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2: The Act allows "housing districts" to remain existence for a period of 25 years from the receipt of first tax increment. Based on this limitation it is anticipated that Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing No. 1 -2 will remain in effect until June, 2012. 21 in the District ECON IMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 1 -1 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON TAX BASE: Y r M r-+ DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON MILL RATES: POTENTIAL JURISDICTION CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES GENERATED _._. COUNTY OF RAMSEY 31.867. 509080 CITY OF Maplewood 17.74 7 329345 OTHER (1) 6.310 119500 SCHOOL DISTRICT #6 22 59.453 108,357 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include: ORIGINAL DISTRICT AS FUTURE DISTRICT AS ASS L• SSED PERCENT OF ASSESSED PERCENT of JURISDICTION TAX BAST: VALUE JURISDICTION VALUE ' JURISDICTION COUNTY OF RAMSEY 3920004099041 2789560 .0087% 1.822 566 .0569% CITY OF Maplewood 263,146, 550 2789560 01059% 198229566 .6926% SCHOOL DISTRICT # 622 376,4349995 278.560 .0740% 10822t566 .4842% Y r M r-+ DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON MILL RATES: POTENTIAL JURISDICTION CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES GENERATED _._. COUNTY OF RAMSEY 31.867. 509080 CITY OF Maplewood 17.74 7 329345 OTHER (1) 6.310 119500 SCHOOL DISTRICT #6 22 59.453 108,357 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include: HOUSING DISTRICT N0, 1 -1 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON TAX BASE: y DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT I MPACT ON MILL RATES: r' M POTENTIAL U I S D ICT I ON CURRENT MILL RATE TAX ES ' C� FNE RATE D J R ._.,. COUNTY OF RAMSEY 31.867 25 o 326 CITY OF Maplewood 17.747 14.104 OTHER t 11 6.310 5.015 SCHOOL DISTRICT # 624 59.453 47 o 250 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include: ORIGINAL DISTRICT AS FUTURE DISTRICT AS ASSLSSED PERCENT OF ASSESSED PERCENT OF JURISDICTION . TAX BASE VALUE JURISDICTION VALUE JURISDICTION COUNTY OF RAMSE Y 3o22094099041 39160 .0001% 794 750 .0247% CITY OF MAPL EWOOD 26391469550 3.160 .0012% 794 7 50 .3020% SCHOOL DISTRICT 1624 227 o 746,1 71 3 160 .0014% 7949750 .3490% y DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT I MPACT ON MILL RATES: r' M POTENTIAL U I S D ICT I ON CURRENT MILL RATE TAX ES ' C� FNE RATE D J R ._.,. COUNTY OF RAMSEY 31.867 25 o 326 CITY OF Maplewood 17.747 14.104 OTHER t 11 6.310 5.015 SCHOOL DISTRICT # 624 59.453 47 o 250 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include: DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON MILL RATES: POTENTIAL JURISDICTION CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES GENERATED COUNTY O ' CITY OF Maplewood 17.7 4 7 2 3 080 OTHER ( 1) 69310 89206 SCHOOL DI STRICT # 622 59.453 77.319 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include: od r M -- ORIGINAL DISTRICT AS FUTURE DISTRICT AS ASSESSED PERCENT OF ASSESSED PERCENT OF JURISDICTION TAX BASE VALUE JURISDICTION VALUE JURISDICTION COUNTY OF RAMSEY 3o22094099041 37 t 440 .0012% 1 t 300, 500 CITY OF Maplewood 2639146.550 379440 .0142% 1.300v500 94942% SCHOOL DISTRICT # 622 3766434999-5 3 7.440 00099% 1930095CO o3455% DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON MILL RATES: POTENTIAL JURISDICTION CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES GENERATED COUNTY O ' CITY OF Maplewood 17.7 4 7 2 3 080 OTHER ( 1) 69310 89206 SCHOOL DI STRICT # 622 59.453 77.319 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include: od r M reparea 3y Ni l:er l ,Sch1-oecer Financial: 6/13/15 C111 of Mi a l ewoo, A i rmsof a Cash F;,ow Ariatvsts �o���tn 1 -2 9 EconoRic 1 -1 Total Caoitalited Total Cumulative Covere3e Cab t a . Revenue Revenue mousing Aeverlue Interest Pr 1 nc i pa 1 Coupon Interest but Service 1a:ance Factor - • 7`J v :921 162, 88S. N 162, US, N 162,805. N 1.6161 S3 3.3 J 54,724.88 89,258.21 139626.19 162, 885.00 162, 8850 Ii 1.111 :Eby , 9!1474.56 1 &5.9%. 65 ►23, 533.53 361.961.78 1859 41N, N 5.101% 158' 2611. v1 3139 2616, N 17, 711.18 t1r% 31.11#74. 56 5, 9x. �9 12! ,125. ai 358.156.:5 1941.0", N 5.253% 148.611.50 338, 641.58 31, 5:3.53 106% A. 56 1459 9`,E. E'1 i 1 d. 3115.75 355, 737. e8 200.41!0. t• 5.5O S 130,168. W 338,160. N 5591911,53 I05x �. 56 1 t5.95E. b9 : ' S, 358.89 352, 189.3 210, 90.10 b. OtaIL 1261 3". as 336, 3611. W 87 11, 519.87 i�15% 04 M 51 55E,. 69 112. 162.12 319.551.17 2211, 969.00 6.2141% 113, 21141. N 333, 246. N 87.513.91 105% A. 46 230. M 91 6.164% 9519", as 329,166. Iii 1IK, 944.34 115% 9:1474.56 14 ;, 9!t.#. E9 1040 944.53 3401 375.78 2101010.11 6.7O 4 83, 66®.10 323, 660. IS 123, 6641.:2 106% -� - : ; � ►. 1: 474" Sb 5. � �. 69 231.13 i . 2., 15.,, 0000 a0 1.0�ax TI, 195. a1 225 195 W , 135 896.31 , :05% �; 9 i' , 9!. 4 7 a . 56 :. 956. E9 : 37, 431.25 1659 0.1. f S 7.280% 5B, 830.19 223, 830. tO 149,497o62 106% 9 %. E9 23),131.25 1 all, O1i1. to 11401% 16, 2311.011 2261 231. N 1611, 698.81 1 415% - ; 9 : y 1 . `_�6 145. y`�b. 69 231,13 t . 25 1959@09,49 7, fiM 32,160. N 227,161. N 1741, 971.12 :05% 237,131.15 2 t 41. aaa.le 1. l �x 7.860% 1 E, 665./9 4924.016 226, 665. N 114, 2910 N 1819736. 37 364,877,62' 1 �i5% 208% 2 : 9 4 7 4 . 56 14519%.69 237,131.25 111,110.041 w-wwww..��www� �ww�r..�rw�ww r�.i.��..-w��iw ww.�w��.wwww�w �; - -- - - - - - - --- -- 1w----- -� -•... 858, 753. i S --- w-- �---.. -.- .-w- -wwww.- -w 31979, 893.33 236, 511.79 •.ww�.��w-wwww- 2, t91e HL N �wwwwww 1,12 a,' 7.',�1 39 911, 527.'N 364,877,62 Z:= =:Z_:===:::_:__,:____ === ===== == =xz=u : =a:n>V==Zx Xs := Xssa:x=sa :as::=ss::: :s sass =s== :s :ss=s :sssas sssssssssssss ssss :s:::::: sssss:::ssss i :.ore of the coverage `actor wa�jes riot Inc :;Idt . :.:ere -it tarried on tie oa:ar►ce. reparea 3y Ni l:er l ,Sch1-oecer Financial: 6/13/15 t x 2.14 Estimated Impact of Tax Increment Financing. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 The estimated impact of Economic Development District No. 1 -1 on the other taxing jurisdictions within Economic Development District No. 1 -1 is set forth on Table I. HOUSING DISTRICT NO, 1 -1 The estimated impact of Housing District No. 1-1- on the other taxing jurisdictions within Housing District No. 1-1 is set forth on Table II. HOUSING DISTRICT NO, 1 -2 The estimated impact of Housing District No. 1 -2 on the other taxing jurisdictions within Housing District No. 1 -2 is set forth on Table III. 2.15 Cash Flow Analysis. See Table IV. 22 2.16 Use of Tax Increment The City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the captured assessed value of taxable property located in Economic Development District No, 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 and 100% of the tax increments to be derived from the Economic Development District No. 1 -1. The tax increments derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 shall be used for the following activities: 1. To pay principal and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds 2. To finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs of Development District No. 1. 3. To finance or otherwise pay premiums for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C, 469, or both. 4. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on the bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C, 469, or both. 5. To finance project costs described in this Tax Increment Financing Plan, 6. To finance other purposes as may be allowed by the Act. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other purposes prohibited by Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the Act. 2.17 Prior Planned Improvements. The City shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of district enlargement with a listing of all properties wthin Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan by the City. The County Auditor 23 shall increase the original assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 or Housing District No. 1-2,, as the case may be, b the assessed value of the y • improvements for which the building permit was issued, excluding the assessed value of improvements for which a building permit was issued during the three (3) month period immediately preceding said approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan.as certified by the assessor. 2.18 Limitation on Qualification of Tax Increment Development on a parcel located within the Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 by the City or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with this Tax Increment Financing Plan shall occur within four (4) years of the date of certification of the original assessed value. For the purposes of this section the term "development" shall mean including demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property, or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent-to the parcel. Development shall not include the installation of utility service including sewer and water systems. If development has not commenced within this period no additional increment shall be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1, or Housing District No. 1 -2, as the case may be. If the City or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences.development,'the City shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue and add it to the original assessed value of the affected Tax Increment Financing District. 2.19 Modifications of Tax Increment Financing Districts. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of Development District No. 1 or Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1., increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination or capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original tax increment financing plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the City, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be 24 acquired by the authority shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a Tax Increment Financing District may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original assessed value by the county auditor. Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 districts may therefore be expanded until 1990. 2.20 Limitation on Administrative Expenses In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 14 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures of an authority other than amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the district, relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to Section 469.1780 Administrative expenses includes amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. No tax increment shall be used to pay any administrative expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. 2.21 Limitation on Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 1, "no tax increment shall be paid to an authority three years from the date of certification by the County Auditor unless within the three -year period (1) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178 or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Sections 469.152 through 469.165, prior to the effective date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired property within the district; or (3) the authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvemewnts within the district..." The City must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, or construct or cause public improvements to be constructed by 1988. or the County Auditor may dissolve the applicable Tax Increment Financing District. 25 2 .2 2 Limitation on Qualification of Property in Tax Increment Financing Districts Not Subject to Improvement Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd . 6, "if, a f ter four years from the date of certification of the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district..., no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of parcel or other site preparation including improvement of a street adjacent to a property but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district* 2.23 Excess Tax Increments. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, the City shall use the excess amount to: 1. prepay the outstanding bonds; 2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore* 3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond; 4. repay any loans including interest on these loans; or Wei 5. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their mill rate. In addition, the City may choose to modify the financing plan as. described in Part II, 2.18, in order to provide further public improvements within the development district. 2.24 Administration of Tax Increment Financing Districts . Administration of Economic Development District No 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -2 and Housing District No. 1 -2 will be handled by the Office of the City Manager. The tax increment received as a result of increases in the assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 will be maintained in a special account separate from -all other municipal accounts and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities identified in the Tax Increment Finance Plan. 2.25 Annual Disclosure Requirements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 5, the City must file with the State Auditor on or before July 1, an annual financial report for all Tax Increment Financing Districts. The report shall also be filed with the school board and county board. The report shall as nearly as possible: 1. Provide for full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in each Tax Increment Financing District; 2. Permit comparison and reconciliation with the City's accounts and financial reports; 3. Permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of each Tax Increment Financing District, including a single Tax Increment Financing District that is part of a multidistrict project or that is funded in part or whole through the use of a development account funded with tax increments from other Tax Increment Financing Districts or with other public money; and 27 4. Be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, In addition, the report shall contain the following information: 1. The original assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District; 2. The captured assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District, including the amount of any captured assessed value shared with other tax districts; 3. The outstanding principal amount of bonds issued or other loans incurred to finance project costs in the Tax Increment Financing District; 4. For the reporting period and for the duration of the Tax Increment Financing District, the amount budgeted under the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and the actual amount expended for, at least, the following categories: A. Acquisition of land and buildings through condemnation or purchase; B. Site improvements or preparation costs; C. Installation of public utilities or other public improvements; and D. Administrative costs, including the allocated cost of the City; 5. For properties sold to developers, the total cost of the property to the City and the price paid by the developer; 6. The amount of tax exempt obligations, other than those reported under clause (3), that were issued on behalf of private entities for facilities located in the Tax Increment Financing District. W SECTION III TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 1 -2 [Adopted September 28, 1987] 3.1 Statement of Objectives. See Section I, Subsection 1.5, Development Program for Development District No. 1. 3.2 Development Program. See Section I. Subsection 1.3, Development Program for Development District No, 1. 3.3 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0, 1 -2 Economic Development District No. 1 -2 is made up of certain parcels located within Development District No. 1. The specific parcels contained in the Tax Increment District are described in Exhibit E. 3.4 Parcels to be Acquired. In connection with Economic Development District No. 1 -2 the City does not intend to acquire and reconvey any parcels to specific developers of property within the City. The City intends to acquire rights of way in connection with the construction of certain public improvements within the Development District, 3.5 Development Activity in Development District No. 1 for which Contracts Have Been Signed. (a) Zantigo Restaurant on County Road is being developed by Zantigo Mexican Restaurants, Inc. on County Road D, West of White Bear Avenue. The contractor is William Kranz Construction and the cost of the project is $260,000. (b) Maple Ridge Square Shopping Center is being developed by Curt Johnson and Joe Weis - Weis Builders, 29 Inc. at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and White Bear Avenue. The contractor is Weis Builders and the cost.of the project is $2,318,383. (c) Maple Ridge Apartments is being developed by Podawiltz Development Company on'County Road D, west of White Bear Avenue. The contractor is Avon Lumber Company, Inc. and the cost of the project is $2,800,000. (d) Maple Ridge Estate Apartments is being developed by Maple Ridge Development Corporation at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue. The contractor is Steve Haight Construction and the cost of the project is $3,999,000. (e) An addition to Maplewood Mall is being developed by CPI. The contractor is Kraus Anderson and the cost of the project is $2,075,000. (f) A Main Street Store at Maplewood Mall is being developed by Federated Department Stores. The contractor is Sheehy Construction and the cost of the project is $21000,000. 3.6 Other Specific Development Expected to Occur Within Development District No. 1. (a) The expansion of St. John's Northeast Hospital on Beam Avenue; (b) It is expected that additional development may occur in Development District No. 1 in the future. The nature and timing of further development cannot accurately be predicted at this time. 3.7 Estimated Cost of Project Costs and Supportive Data. The estimated costs of certain of the public improvements set forth in the Development Program to be made within Development District No. 1 and financed by tax increments to be derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -2 (together with any available tax increments from Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1- 1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 within Development District No. 1) are $845,0000 30 PLIBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY [Section 1.7(c)(ix) and (x)] $ 689,000 LEGAL FEES, PLANNING FEES, COSTS OF ISSUANCE & CONTINGENCY $ 33,450 BOND DISCOUNT $ 16,550 INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCREMENT TO FULLY FUND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST $ 106,000 TOTAL AMOUNTS OF BONDS TO BE SOLD $-845r000 SUPPORTIVE DATA FOR ESTIMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS OR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UNDER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ITEM BASIS FOR ESTIMATE PUBLIC.IMPROVEMENTS Estimates by City Staff PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Estimates of Project Costs for legal assistance, bond issuance costs, planning provided by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR The amount of capitalized interest TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCRE- will be equal to an amount suf -. MENT TO FULLY FUND ficient to pay interest on the PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST Tax Increment Bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increments to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. 31 3.8 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. It is anticipated that Tax Increment Bonds in the amount of $845,000 will be incurred with respect to this portion of the development activities to be undertaken within Development District No. 1. 3.9 Sources of Revenue It is anticipated that the sources of revenue to pay the costs associated with this portion of the development activities to be undertaken within Development District No. 1 are Tax Increment Bond proceeds and special assessments. 3.10 Original Assessed Value and Fiscal Disparities. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0, 1 -2: The original assessed value of all taxable property in Economic Development District No. 1 -2 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1986 with respect to the assessed value of such property as of January 2, 1986, for taxes payable in 1987 is estimated to be $151,113. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 1, requires that the original assessed value in economic development districts be adjusted to the average percentage increase in the assessed value of all property in the Economic Development District No. 1 -1 during the five years prior to certification. The rate of adjustment for the District is approximately 2.50 %. The City hereby elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause (b). 3.11 Estimated Captured Assessed Value. Each year the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -2 to calculate the tax increment payable to the City of Maplewood. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in Economic Development District No. 1 -2 above the original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in Economic Development District No. 1 -2 declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. 32 The County Auditor shall cert i f y in each year after the date the original assessed value was certified, the amount the original assessed value has increased or decreased as a result of. 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court - ordered abatements. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 Upon completion of the development expected to occur within Economic Development District No, 1 -2 the City. estimates the assessed value of the Property within Economic Development District No. 1 -2 to be $1,903,363. The captured assessed value upon completion is expected to annually approximate $1,752,250. This amount will be captured for up to 8 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The city requests 70% of the available increase in assessed value from Economic Development District No. 1 -2 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan (the balance of the increase being used to pay the fiscal disparaties contribution of Economic Development District No. 1 -2) . 3.12 Type of Tax Increment Financing District. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0, 1 -2 Pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 12 of the Act, the City finds that Economic Development District No. 1 -2 qualifies as an "economic development district ": 1. Economic District No. 1 -2 does not meet the requirements to qualify as either a housing or a redevelopment district. 2. The creation of Economic Development District No. 1 -2 is in the public interest because it will preserve and enhance the tax base of the City and it will result in increased employment within the City. 33 3.13 Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2: The Act allows "economic development districts" to remain in existence for a period of 8 years from the receipt of the first tax increment or 10 years from the approval of the tax increment financing plan, whichever is less. Based on these limitations it is anticipated that Economic Development District No. 1 -2 will remain in effect until eight years from the receipt of the first tax 'increment, 3.14 Estimated Impact of Tax Increment Financing. HOUSING DISTRICT NO, 1 -2 The estimated impact of Economic Development District No. 1 -2 on the other taxing jurisdictions within Economic Development District No. 1 -2 is . set forth on Table V. 3.15 Cash Flow Analysis. See Table VI. 34 TABLE . V ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON TAX BASE.: Original Jurisdiction Tax Base Assessed Value County of Ramsey 3,283,594,890 151,113 City of Maplewood 274,69.1,365 151,113 School District No. 622 297, 420, 326 151,1.13 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON MILL RATES: Jurisdiction County of Ramsey City of Maplewood Other (1) School District No. 622 Current Mill Rate 32.225 18.387 6.843 59.110 District as Puture Percent of Assessed Jurisdiction Value .0046% 1,903,363 .0550% 11903,363 .0508% 1003,363 Potential Taxes Generated 61,336 34,997 13,025 112,508 1 Other taxing jurisdictions include: Metro Council Regional Commission, Mosquito Control District, County Library District and Metro Watershed Area District as Percent of Jurisdiction .0580% .6929% .6400% I -AX 1 NURLMLN 't LASH N LUW (i )- UMMARY tikj- 'faH7- .TABLE VI CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MAIN STREET STORE PROJECT REVENUES ----------------- I ----------- EXPENSES ----------- TAX BOND INVESTMENT PROJECT DEBT ANNUAL. YEAR END CUM. LOWEST CUM. YEAR . r _ _ wrb . INCREMENT . . r •.. _ PROCEEDS INCOME . .. _ A r . w r ----------- �� �� •� OTHER .r �� �A �� �r +� - - COSTS - - - w _ - - - - - -r - - - _ - w OTHER - _ _ - �� ..�� .r. �� w SERVICE �� �� .r w r. •.w w - - _ - BALANCE w w +. .. w •......r .o. ..r BALANCE . . + +r. ... ... w.. _ r_ .. BALANCE ... . . r. . . - ._. __ .. ._ i 1988 0 0 405, 000 U 0 329.1 .r:` 0 25,9000 14, 204 36,1546 � 36 546 : :.-;E; � �► 1989 1990 719230 ca c' t� c� 0 24,350 (2 4, 3.50) 12,1196 1991 70,1896 0 e) 0 0 0 24, 350 63,300 469880 7l596 59.9076 66 672 � � 1 .6 1301 1992 1993 709562 709228 0 c� 0 0 0 0 66, 013 (30 732) � 35 � 9.40 1 c_) � , 4 7 1 994 699896 _ 0 0 (3 to 0 63, 493 � 6, 9()2 � � 429 8�f2 1995 699562 0 0 0 0 65,735 413,27 4 7 16 9 19 1996 699228 0 0 0 t� �� 62,1735 69 994 54 163 L:4 -987 Y 1997 68 , 894 0 c� c� c- a ca .64 5�� ; 65, 88c� 4, 8 u 3, 1 1 5 ��5� , 62, 2:34 L . .=.Q, �`�, 7E- T 1998 0 C� _ �� ca �� �:� 61, 98V (27, 5s3) 34, 7c:� 1 << -f(_,1 ...•r..`wrr.www...... + r 56016 496 .w.rw'n.w+r..rr..r:r.. w.+. r•.rwww+...r 405, 000 ._.. 0 w.. .. ... 10 w .+..rw.r..i_•io•ir :'r. 329, 250 w. ..i. urw..' ow•i--- 25, ( -')00 - -- --.. 576, 545 i Me KLPIL 14 1 H S163,163UPIP 1 1 ul% hulviiilH " y HL Pu h I CITY OF MAPLEWOOD9 MINNESOTA MAIN STREET STORE PROJECT • I ASSESSED VALUE ($000) TAX AVERAGE ANNUAL LEVY COLL MILL INCRMT INVEST, GROWTH RATE YEAR YEAR TOTAL BASE RATE AVAIL. RATE OF ASSESSED VALUE 1987 '1988 135 135 1190210 70.00 00 00.1 BASE 2o50 1988 1989 138 138 119-8210 70.00 0'a o0o 1989 1990. 995 141 1190210 70w00 00000 TOTAL = 0.000 1990 1991 995 145 119-8210 70.00 onoof) 1991 1992 995 149 1190210 70sO . 0 00000 1992 1993 995 153 119,210 70.00 0-0000 1993 1994 995 157 1190210 70o ()O 00000 1994 1995 995 161 1190210 70eOO 010000 1995 1996 995 165 1190210 70oOO 08000 Iry 1996 .1997 995 169 1190 210 70ooO- 00000 I l*AX 1 s4LHl--MhNl* 8UNJ ISSUE SUMMARY HLPUHl* CITY OF MAPL.EWOOD9 . MINNESOTA MAIN STREET STORE PROJECT BONDS ----------------- I 405,,000 171,9545 576,0545 INTEREST START DATE FIRST INTEREST DATE BOND YEARS AVERAGE LIFE AVERAGE COUPON Jan-88 Aug-88 2,s 788. 750 6.886 YRS, 6s 151 % I PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL DEBT SERVICE YEAR PAYMENTS PAYMENTS & INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO 0 5e250 14,j204 14,204 Cap I n t 1989 4) 59 25CJ 249350 24,350 Cap I n t 1990 0 5. 215 0 24,9 350 .::a 2411 350 Cap,Int 1991 409000 5, 226 5 0 23, 300 63-9300 112,53 1992 45,9000 5. 5()O 21,1013 66,0013 107,40 1993 45rj000 5. 7ot) 18, 493 63,493 111*13 .1994 50,000 5e 900 15.,735 65,1735 106,84 1995 50,1000 6.0 100 12,735 62,735 11 1.41 1996 55,9 000 60 2.000 91505 64, 5(--jz$ "'- 107.84 1997 60,000 6,400 51880 659,880 105*08 1998 60, 000 60 600 1., 98c) 61's 980 111,16 405,,000 171,9545 576,0545 INTEREST START DATE FIRST INTEREST DATE BOND YEARS AVERAGE LIFE AVERAGE COUPON Jan-88 Aug-88 2,s 788. 750 6.886 YRS, 6s 151 % I TABLE VI CITY OF MAPLEW0OD* MINNESOTA MAPLEWOOD MALL ADDITION PROJECT TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW 'IUMMARY REFOORT REVENUES I ----------- EXPENSES ----------- I TAX BOND INVESTMENT PROJECT DEBT ANNUAL YEAR END cumo LOWE CUM. YEAR INCREMENT PROCEEDS INCOME ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OTHER COSTS OTHER SERVICE BALANCE -------- BALANCE BALVINLL i 988 0 440,j000 0 359,1750 25.,000 15,l454 39,796 39-j796 1989 1990 G 749426 0 0 269492 (26-9492) 131304 1991 74r410 0 0 (5 0 26,; 492 47.l934 61,1238 1992 749360 0 0 0 701311 679893 4.l()99 (30s 713) 65.9337 34.0 .:A i j s'-) Zp 1993 1994 749326 749280 t :1 t:� t:� to 0 70,9231 4,1112 38,1736 � �:� `� l� 1995 749242 0 0 0 0 0 0 G71331 61972 45,9708 191.36 749242 o 0 0 o 69, 17 8 51083 509791 1997 74t160 o c) 0 3., 6(.)2 54,1393 1 6- 6 1998 0 71 7(.)o 21501 56,894 C) 729 310 (359230) 21, 664 1 C., L' 4 594,446 440,9000 359.9 750 25,90(30 TAX INCREMENT BOND ISSUE SUMMARY REPORT CITY OF HAPLEWOOD9 MINNESOTA MAPLEWOOD HALL ADDITION PROJECT BONDS ----------------- I 4401()()() INTEREST START DATE FIRST INTEREST DATE BOND YEARS AVERAGE LIFE OVERAGE COUPON Jars-88 3.0051,667 6o936 YRSo 60162 I I PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL DEBT SERVICE YEAR PAYMENTS t X PAYMENTS & INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO 19813 5,250 15,454 15,454 Cap In 1989 0 5o250 26,1 492 26,492 Cap I n t 19910 0 5. `5o G, , 4 9 26,492- Cap I n t 1991 45,1000 5,w250 25, 31 1 701 31 1 105,85 1992 45, 000 5,w500 229893 6-71893 109,60 11393 50,1000 5,700 2(), 231 70,231 105,88 1994 5.900 1-71331 G- 79 331 110,38 1995 55,(: 00 6,100 141,178 69,9 178 107,38 199' 6, 2oo 10,9644) 70,640 105,10 19-97 65,1 000 6o400 6.17(- 30 71, 7()o 103.55 19,98 7 ej G- 600 21310 72,310 102.56 4401()()() INTEREST START DATE FIRST INTEREST DATE BOND YEARS AVERAGE LIFE OVERAGE COUPON Jars-88 3.0051,667 6o936 YRSo 60162 I I CITY OF MAPLEWOOD9 MINNESOTA MAPLEWOOD MALL ADDITION PROJECT TAX INCREMENT ASSUMPTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ASSESSED VALUE TAX AVERAGE ANNUAL LEVY COLL MILL INCRMT INVEST, GROWTH RATE YEAR YEAR TOTAL BASE RATE AVAIL. RATE OF ASSESSED VALUE 19437 19813 is 16 1190210 70a00 0.000 BASE 2w 50 1988 1989 16 16 1190 2010 70-ooO 00000 1989 1990 909 17 119,210 70w00 0.000 TOTAL = ow 00 1990 1991 9.09 17 119,9210 70. v0 00000 1991 1992 909 18 119.210 70e00 0.000 1992 1993 909 18 1190210 70,043 00000 1993 1994 909 19 1190210 70,00 01000 1994 1995 909 19 1 191 210 70.,00 (),()(.-)o 1995 1996 90#3 19 119-210 70.00 00000 1996 1997 909 2 () 1190 210 74-')o 00 U. Wo 3.16 Use of Tax Increment The City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the captured assessed value of taxable property located in Economic Development District No. 1 -2. The tax increments derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -2, shall be used for the following activities. 1. To pay principal and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds . 2. To finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs of Development District No. 1. 3. To finance or otherwise pay premiums for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters, 462C, 469, or both. 4. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on the bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C, 469, or both. 5. To finance project costs described in this Tax Increment Financing Plan, 6. To finance other purposes as may be allowed by the Act, These revenues shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other purposes prohibited by Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the Act. 3.17 Prior Planned Improvements. The City shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to'the County Auditor or its notice of district enlargement with a listing of all properties within Economic Development District No. 1 -2, for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan by the City. The County Auditor shall increase the original assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -2, by the assessed value of the improvements for which the building permit was issued, excluding the assessed value of improvements for which a building permit was issued during the three (3) month period 35 i immedately preceding said approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan as certified by the assessor., 3.18 Limitation on Qualification of Tax Increment Development on a parcel located within the Economic Development District No. 1 -2 by the City or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with this Tax Increment Financing Plan shall occur within four (4) years of the date of certification of the original assessed value. For the purposes of this section the term "development" shall mean including demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of property, or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent to the parcel. Development shall not .include the installation of utility service including sewer and water systems. If development has not commenced within this period no additional increment shall be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -2. If the City or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences development, the City shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue and add it to the original assessed value of Economic Development District No, 1 -2. 3.19 Modifications of Tax Increment Financing Districts, In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of Development District No. 1 or Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a - determination or capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original tax increment financing plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the City, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be acquired by the authority shall be approved upon the notice PP P and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a Tax Increment Financing District may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original assessed value by the county auditor. Housing District No. 1 -2 may therefore be expanded until 1992. 36 3.20 Limitation on Administrative Expenses In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,. Subd. 14 and Minnesota Statutes Section 469.176 Subd. 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures p itures of an authority other than amounts paid for the urchase of land or amounts paid to contra P contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, g g ices , directly connected with the physical development of the real property n the district •t Y , relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued ursuant to Section 469.178. Administrative trative expenses includes amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. No tax increment shall 11 be used to pay any administrative expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the less. project, whichever is P 3.21 Limitation on Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 1, , no tax increment shall be paid to an authority hree years from the date of certification Y ication,by the County Auditor unless within the three -year period 1 bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178 or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Sections 469.152 through 469.165, rior to the effective P date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired ro ert within P P Y the district; or (3) the authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvemewnts within the district...' The City must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, q P P Y► or construct or cause public improvements to be constructed b 1988 or the County may Y ay dissolve the applicable Tax Increment Financing District, 3.22 Limitation on Qualification of Property in Tax Increment Financing Districts Not Subject to Improvement Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 6, "if, a f ter four years from the date of certification of.the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district..., no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of 37 parcel or other site preparation including improvement of a street adjacent to a property but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of -the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. 3.23 Excess Tax Increments. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.'176, Subd. 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, the City shall use the excess amount to: 1. prepay the outstanding - bonds; 2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore; 3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond; 4. repay any loans including interest on these loans; or 5. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their mill rate. In addition, the City may choose to modify the financing plan as described in Part II, 2.18, in order to provide further public improvements within the development district. W 3.24 Administration of Tax Increment Financin Districts. Administration of Economic Development District No 1 -2 will be handled by the Office of the City Manager, Mana g The tax increment received as a result of increases in the assessed value of Economic Development District No. t- P 2 will be maintained in a special account separate from all other municipal accounts and expended onl y upon on sanctioned municipal activities id enti f ied in the Tax Increment Finance Plan. 3.25 Annual Disclosure Requirements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 5, the City must file with the State Auditor on or before July 1, an annual financial report ort for all Tax Increment Financin g Districts . The report shall also be filed with the school board and county board. The report s hall as nearly as possible: p 1. Provide for full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in each Tax Increment Financing g 2. Permit comparison and reconciliation with the City's accounts and financial reports; 3. Permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of each Tax Increment Financing District, including a single Tax Increment Financing District that is part of a multidistrict project or that is funded *n art or whole through the use of P g a development account funded with tax increments from other Tax Increment Financing istricts public money; and or with other ubli g 4. Be consistent with generally accepted accounting g In addition, the report shall contain the following information: . 1. The original assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District; 2. The captured assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District, including the amount of an captured assessed value shared Y ca P with other tax districts; 39 3. The outstanding principal amount of bonds nds issued or other loans incurred to finance project costs in the Tax Increment Financing District; 4. For the reporting period and for the -duration the .Tax Increment Financing orati of c ing D.i s tric t , the amount budgeted under the Tax Increment Financing lan and the ended for, g � actual amount ex P r, at least, the following categories: A. Acquisition of land and buildings through purchase; condemnation or g B. Site improvements or preparation costs; C. Installation of public utilities or other public improvements; and - D. Administrative costs, including the allocated cost of the City; 5. For properties sold to developers, the property total cost of the ro p p p y to the City and the price paid by the developer; 6. The amount of tax exempt obligations, other than those reported under g ' P r clause that were issued on behalf of private entities for facilities located in the Tax Increment Financing District. 40 SECTION IV TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 [Adopted January 11, 1988] [Modified May 8, 1989] 4.1 Statement of Objectives. See Section I, Subsection 1.51 Development Program fo Development District No. 1. p g r 4.2 Development Program. See Section I, Subsection 1.3, Development Program for No, 1. Development District N p g 4.3 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financin District. HOUSING DISTRICT NO, 1 -3 Housing District No. 1 -3 is made up of certain arcels located within Development District - p p tract No . 1. The specific parcels contained in the Tax Increment District are described on Exhibit F. 4.4 Parcels to be Acquired. In connection with Housing District No. 1 -3 the City intends to acquire.from Cottages g of Maplewood Limited Partnership and reconvey to Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership he property •p P p p rty described on Exhibit F. 4.5 Development Activity in Development District No. 1 for which Contracts Have Been-Signed, (a) Zantigo Restaurant on County Road was developed by Zantigo Mexican Restaurants, ts Inc. on County Road D. West of White Bear Avenue. The contractor was William Kranz Construction and the cost of the project was $260,000. (b) Maple Ridge Square Shopping Center was developed by Curt Johnson and Joe Weis - Weis Builders Inc. at the intersection of Gervai.s Avenue and White Bear Avenue. The contractor was Weis Builders and the cost of the project was $2,318,383. 41 (c) Maple Ridge Apartments was developed b ment Company p Y Podawiltz Develo P p nY on County Road D, west of White Bear Avenue. The contractor was Avon Lumber Company, Inc. and the cost of the ro 'ect was P � $2,800,000. (d) Maple Ridge Estate Apartments p was developed by Maple Ridge Development Corporation at the intersection of Stillwater ntersectlon r Road and Stillwater Avenue. The contractor was Steve Haight Construction and the cost o ' was $3 999 00 f the project 0. (e) An addition to Maplewood Mall is being developed by CPI. . The contractor is Kraus Anderson and the cost of the project is $2,075,000. (f) A Main Street Store at- Maplewood Mall is being developed by Federated Department Stores. The contractor for is Sheehy Construction and the cost of t ' he project is $ 2 000 ,000. 4.6 Other Specific Develo ment Ex ected to Occur ' p ur Wlthln Dev to ment District No. 1. (a) The development of a 60 unit Senior Citizen housing complex (known as the Cottages of Maplewood) is being proposed by Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership. (b) The development of the Crossings Mall to be located adjuacent to Maplewood Mall. (c) It is expected that additional development may occur in Development District No. 1 in the future. The nature and timing of further development cannot accurately be predicted at this time. 4.7 Estimated Cost of project Costs and Supportive ve . � data. The estimated costs of the land acquisition and site improvements set forth q in the Development Program to be made within Development District No. 1 and financed b tax x increments to be derived from Housing istrict No. I- with g 3 (together any available tax increments from Economic Development District No, 1 -11 Economic Development District ct No. 1 -2, Economic Development District No. 1 -3 Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing strict Di No. 1 -2 within Development District No. 1) are $553,831. 42 LAND ACQUISITION, SITE IMPROVEMENTS, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY $553r831-00 LEGAL FEES, PLANNING FEES, COSTS OF ISSUANCE & CONTINGENCY $ 20000.00 BOND DISCOUNT $ 9,825.00 INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCREMENT TO FULLY FUND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST $ 71044.00 TOTAL AMOUNTS OF BONDS TO BE SOLD $655,000.00 SUPPORTIVE DATA FOR ESTIMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS OR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UNDER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ITEM LAND ACQUISITION, SITE IMPROVEMENTS, PUBLIC IMPROVEMMENTS, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BASIS FOR ESTIMATE Estimates by City Staff Estimates of Project Costs for legal assistance, bond issuance costs, planning provided by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR The amount of capitalized interest TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCRE- will be equal to an amount suf- MENT TO FULLY FUND ficient to pay interest on the PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST Tax Increment Bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increments to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing* therefore, the above figure 43 is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. 4.8 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. It is anticipated that Tax Increment Bonds in the' amount of $655,000 will be incurred with respect to this portion of the development activities e p p i s to be undertaken within Development District No. 1. 4.9 Sources of Revenue It is anticipated that the sources of revenue to a the costs associated with this portion pay p, of the development activities to be undertaken within Development District p No. 1 are Tax Increment Bond proceeds. 4.10 Original Assessed Value. The original assessed value of all taxable ro ert in Housing District No. 1 -3 as p p Y most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota being he certification made in 1987 with r g respect to the assessed value of such property as of January 2, 1987, for taxes a able p y In 1987 is estimated to be $62,737, 4.11 Estimated Captured Assessed Value. Each year the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3 to calculate the tax increment a able to the City of Maplewood* In a � p Y p any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in Housing istrict No. 1 -3 the original ass g above assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in Housing using District No. 1 -3 declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax yable p increment will be a p . The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the original assessed value was certified the a the original assessed value � mount lue has .increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; Y 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic district; boundaries of the d 44 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court- ordered abatements. Upon completion of the development expected to occur within Housing District No. 1 -3 the City estimates the assessed value of the Property within Housing District No. 1 -3 to be $1,322,631. The captured assessed value upon completion is estimated to annually approximate $1,259,894. This amount will be captured for up to 25 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The city requests 100% of the available increase in assessed value from Housing District No. 1 -3 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan, 4.12 Type of Tax Increment Financing District. Pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 12 of the Act, the City finds that Housing District No. 1 -3 qualifies as a "housing district": 1. Housing District No. 1 -3 qualifies as a "housing district" because a portion of each project is intended for occupancy, in part, by persons of low and moderate income as defined'in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts. 2. The creation of Housing District No. 1 -3 is in the public interest because it will preserve and enhance the tax base of the City and it will result in increased employment within the City. 4.13 Duration of Tax Increment Financina Districts, The Act allows "housing districts" to remain in existence for a period of 25 years from the receipt of the first tax increment. Based on these limitations it is anticipated that Housing District No. 1 -3 will remain in effect until December, 2012, 45 4.14 Estimated Impact of Tax Increment Financing, .The estimated impact of Housing District No. 1 -3 on the-other taxing jurisdictions within Housing istrict No. 1 -3 Table VII. is set - f orth on g 4.15 Cash Flow Analysis. See Table VIII. 4.16. Use of Tax Increment The City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the captured assessed value of taxable property located in Housing istrict No. p p y g 1 -3. The tax increments derived from Housing District No. 1 -3, shall be used for the followin activities: g I. To pay principal and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds. 2. To finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs p of Development District No, 1, 3. To finance or otherwise pay premiums for insurance or other security guaranteein g the payment when of principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters, 462C, 469, or both. 4. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing he payment when due of the g principal and interest on the bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C, 469 or both. p 5. To finance project costs described in this Tax Increment Financing Plan, 6. To finance other purposes as may be allowed b the Act, y These revenues shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations a licable- to the City limit • PP ty nor for other purposes prohibited by Section 469.176, Subd . 4 of the Act. 4.17 Prior Planned Improvements. The City shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to.the County Auditor 46 or its notice of district enlargement with a listing of all properties wthin Housing District No. 1 -3, for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the Tax-Increment Financing Plan by the City. The County Auditor shall increase the original assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3,,by the assessed value of the improvements for which the building permit was issued, excluding the assessed value of improvements for which a building permit was issued during the three (3) month period immediately preceding said approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan as certified by the assessor. 4.18 Limitation on Qualification of Tax Increment Development on a parcel located within Housing District No. 1 -3 by the City or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with this Tax Increment Financing Plan shall occur within four (4) years of the date of certification of the original assessed value. For the purposes of this section the term "development" shall mean including demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property, or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent to the parcel. Development shall not include the installation of utility service including sewer and water systems. If development has not commenced within this period no additional increment shall be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3. If the City or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences development, the City shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue and add it to the original assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3. 4.19 Modifications of Tax Increment Financing Districts . In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of Development District No. 1 or Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination or capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original tax increment financing plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the City, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be 47 acquired by the authority shall be approved upon the notice ice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required s g for approval of the original plan. The eo ra hic area o g g p f a Tax Increment Financing District may be reducedf but shall n be enlarged .after five ea of years following the date of certification of the original assessed value b the count auditor. Housing District No. � y 1- 3 may therefore ore be expanded until 1992. 4.20 Limitation on Administrative Expenses In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 14 and Minnesota Statutes Section 4 . 69.176, Subd. 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures authority ther than p s of an y amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing aterials and services, includin arc g • g architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the property in the •p real p y district, relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing businesses g or located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued ursuant to Section 469.178, Administrative P ative expenses includes amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development p consultants. No tax increment shall be used to pay an administrative expenses or f a project e y p p ct which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the project, wh i c heve r is less. 4.21 Limitation on Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, �� Subd. 1, no tax increment shall be paid to an authority hree years from the date of certification y by the County Auditor unless within the three -year period (1) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178 or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Sections 469.152 through 4699165, prior to the effective date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired property within the district; o q p p y r (3) the authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvemewnts within the district..." The City must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, p p y' or construct or cause q public improvements to be constructed by 1991 or the County Auditor may dissolve the applicable Tax istrict g . Increment Financin D' pp 4.22 Limitation on Qualification of Property in Tax Increment Financing Districts Not Subject to Improvement Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd . 6. "if, after f our years f rom . the date of certification of the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district..., no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of parcel or other site preparation including improvement of a street adjacent to a property but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment.financing district by the.authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. 4.23 Excess Tax Increments. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, the City shall use the excess amount to: 1. prepay the outstanding bonds; 2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore; 3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond* 4. repay any loans including interest on these loans; or 49 5. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxin g jurisdictions in proportion to their mill rate. In addition, the City may choose to modif y the financing plan as described in Part II,'2.18, in order to rovide further public improvements P P s within the development district. 4.24 Administration of Tax Increment Financin Districts. Administration of Housing District No. 1 -3 will be handled by the Office of the City Manager. The tax increment received as a result of increases in the assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3 will be maintained in a special account separate from all other municipal accounts and expended only upon sanctioned municipal Tax Increment Finance Plan activities identified in the P . 4.25 Annual Disclosure Requirements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 5, the City must file with the State Auditor on or before ,July 1, an annual financial report for all Tax Increment Financing Districts. The report shall also be filed with the school board and county board. The report shall as nearly as possible: 1. Provide for full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in each Tax Increment Financing District; 2. Permit comparison and reconciliation with the City's accounts and financial reports; 3. Permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of each Tax Increment Financing District, includin g a single Tax Increment Financing District that is art of a multidistrict r P project or that is funded in part or whole through the use of a development account funded with tax increments from other Tax Increment Financing Districts or with other public money; and 4. Be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. 50 In addition, the report shall contain the following inf ormation : 1. The original assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District; 2. The captured assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District, including the amount of any captured assessed value shared with other tax districts; 3. The outstanding principal amount of bonds issued or other loans incurred to finance project costs in the Tax Increment Financing District; 4. For the reporting period and for the duration of the Tax Increment Financing District, the amount budgeted under the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and the actual amount expended for, at least, the following categories: A. Acquisition of land and buildings through condemnation or purchase; B. Site improvements or preparation costs; C. Installation of public utilities or other public improvements; and D. Administrative costs, including the allocated cost of the City; 5. For properties sold to developers, the total cost of the property to the City and the price paid by the developer;. 6. The amount of tax exempt obligations, other than those reported under clause (3), that were issued on behalf of private entities for facilities located in the Tax Increment Financing District. 51 TABLE VIII HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 IMPACT ON TAX BASE: Jurisdiction County of Ramsey City of Maplewood School Dist. #622 Tax Base 31?283,594,890 274,691,365 297,420,326 Original District as Future Assessed Percent of Assessed Value Jurisdiction Value 62,737 .0019% 1,322,631 62,737 .0028% 11322,631 62,737 .0211% 1,322,631 HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 IMPACT ON MILL RATES: Jurisdiction Current Mill Rate Potent County of Ramsey 32.225 City of Maplewood 18.387 Other (1) 6.843 School Dist. #622 59.110 42,622 24,319 9,051 78,181 District as Percent of Jurisdiction .0403% .4815% .4447% • de: Metro Council, Regional Transit Commission, Other taxing jurisdictions include: Area ' of District, County Library District and Metro Watershed Mosquito Control TABLE IX $400,000 G. 0. Taxable Tax Increment Bonds of 1988 City of Maplewood, Minnesota Sources: Par amount of Bonds LESS: Discount (1.96 %) Uses: Project Cost Estimated Cost of Issuance Capitalized Interest Balance Total Uses $400,000.00 8,000.00 $3929000.00 $2759000.00 12,500.00 101,687.50 2,812.50 $392,000.00 Issue Date: Settlement Date, First Coupon: $ 400,000 G 0 Taxable Tax Increment Bonds of 1988 City of Maplewood, Minnesota Debt Service Schedule 2 /oi /sa 2 /oi /s8 a /oi /as Date Principal coupon Interest Service 8/01/88 2/01/89 0.00 01000 -------- 18 -337.50 ' ------ - - - - -- 1 8,.337 , 50 8/01/89 0000 0000 0.000 0.000 18,337.50 18 337.50 ' 18,337.50 18,337.50 2/01/90 8/01/90 0.00 0. 000 18, 337.50 18, 337.50 2/01/91 0100 50,000000 00000 89600 18 337.5 � 0 18,337.50 18, 337.50 68,337950 8/01/91 2/01/92 0000 50 000.00 00000 89800 16 187.5 � 0 16,187.50 8/01/92 0.00 0.000 16, 187.50 13 987.50 66, 187.50 13, 987.50 2/01/93 8/01/93 50 000.00 9. 000 ,,' 13 , 987.50 r-3 , 987.50 2/01/94 0.00 50 000.00 00000 9.150 11 737.50 ' 11,737.50 11,737.50 61,737.50 8/01/94 2/01/95 0000 50 000.00 .0.000 9.300 9 450.00 ' 9,450.00 8/01/95 0000 0:000 9,450.00 7 125.OQ ' 59,450.00 71125900 2/01/9 6 8/01/96 5�0 000.00 9.400 7, 125.00 57,125.00 2/01 / 97 0000 50 ,000.00 00000 90500 4 775.0 � 0 4 775.00 ' 4,775.00 S4 775.00 8/01/97 2/01/98 0000 50, 000.00 0.000 9.600 2,400.00 , 21400.00 ------- - - - - -- 2 400. 0 0 52,400.00 TOTALS 400, 000.00 241,350.00 641,350.00 Accrued Interest to 2/01/88 = 0.00 Total Bond Years = 2600. Gross Interest Cost = $ 241,350.00 Average Coupon 99283$ NIC = 99590-% Average Life = 6.50 Years Discount @ 98.0 8 000.00 File: maple.dbt Prepared by MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 12 /04/87 City of Maplewood, Minnesota TIF Cash Flow Tax Increment Financing District _ ==- ----- T•1 =_ =_ == sass = s s s s Total Late 1989 s == s s s s s z s ss s s s s s s =ssssss = s s s ss s s s s s s! s s ss s ss s s s s ss s s s s s s s s = s s s s s s s ss s s= s Col Year D/S Date Available Income Estimated Coupon Principal Interest Debt Service Annual Balance Cumulative Annual Cumulative -=-' T==-====- sss:== == = =as. =s =a =_saxssssssste saas= sssssss = =s = =sssssss Balance 8/1/89 =ss =ssssassasss sssssss sss= ssssss =ssssss =Coverage =a =Coserage s 1989 1990 2/1/90 211191 0.40 0.000% 12.551.25 12.551.25 37,653.75 (12,551.25 25,102.50 1991 1992 2/1/92 2/1/93 21,446.49 6.900�c 0.00 0.00 25.102.50 25,102.50 25,102.50 25,102.50 (25,102.50 2,343.99 0.00 2,343.99 0.00 109.34 100.00 109.34 1993 2/1/94 28,446.49 29,446.49 6.900�c 6.900% 6.900 Q•00 0.00 25,102.50 25,102.50 25,102.50 25,102.50 3,343.99 4,343.99 5,687.97 113.32 122.66 1994 1995 2/1/95 2/1/96 30,446.49 31.446.49 6.900�c 7.000% 5 •000.00 25,102.50 30,102.50 343.99 10,031.96 10,375.95 117.30 101.14 139.96 134.47 1996 211197 27,456.49 7.000% 7.000 5.000.00 0.00 24.757.50 24,407.50 29,757.50 24,407.54 1,688.99 3.048.99 12,064.94 15,113.92 105.68 140.54 1997 1998 , 2/1/98 2/1/99 28,971.49 30,486.49 7.050% 7.100% 0'00 5,000.00 24.407.50 24,407.50 24,407.50 29,407.50 4,563.99 19,677.91 112.49 118.70 161.92 180.62 1999 2000 Z /1 /00 2/1/01 32,016.49 32 546.49 7.1 50% 5,000.00 24,052.50 29,052.50 1.078.99 2.963.99 20,756.90 23,120.88 103.67 110.20 170.58 181.65 2001 2002 2/1/02 2/1/03 30.586 7.200% 7.250% 0.00 5,000.40 23,695.00 23,695.00 23,695.00 28,695.00 4.851.49 1,891.49 28,572.37 30,463.86 120.47 106.59 220.58 206.16 2003 2/1/04 32'646.49 32* 646-49 29,726.49 7.250% 7.300% 5,000.00 5,000.00 23,332.50 22,970.00 28,332.50 27,970.00 4,313.99 34,777.85 115.23 222.75 2004 2005 2/1/05 2/1/06 27,351. 49 30,501.49 7.300% 0.00 22,605.00 22,605.00 1,756.49 4,746.49 36t534.33 41,280.82 106.28 121.00 230.62 282.62 2006 211101 28,651.49 7.350% 7.400�C 5,000.00 5,000. 00 22,605.00 22,237.50 27,605.00 27,237.50 2,896.49 1,413.99 44 177.31 45,591.30 .110.49 260.03 2007 2008 2/1/08 2/1/09 27,326.49 31,526.49 1.450x 7.450 5,000.00 21,867.50 26,867.50 458.99 46,050.28 105.19 101.11 267.38 271.40 2009 2010 2/1/10 2 /1/11 '75,726.49 75,126.49 7.500% 5,000.00 50,000.00 21,495.00 21,122.50 26,495.00 71,122.50 5,031.49 4,603.99 51,081.77 55,685.76 118.99 106.47 292.80 178.30 2011 2/1/12 75,726.x9 7.500% 1.50o 7.550 % 50,000.00 55,000.00 17,372.50 13,622.50 67,372.50 68,622.50 8,353.99 7,103.99 64,039.74 71,143.73 i12.a0 195.05 2012 2013 2/1/13 2/1/14 75726.49 75 , 126, 49 1. 550% 7.600 60,000.00 9,470.00 69,470.00 6,256.49 77,400.22 110.35 109.01 203.67 211.42 "�'__- ______ 65,000.00 4,940.00 69,940.00 5,186.49 83,186.71 108.27 218.94 = = =�= as =�asssssa =a =s =ssss 911,659.21 =ssasssssss =ssaaass ssss== 335,000.00 ssss= sss 531,126.25 atsssssssssssassa 866,126.25 =assssssaassaaass ssssss =assassssssssssssss )OURCE & APPLICATION STATEMENT 'ar Amount of Bonds Less) Discount @ 1.75% otal Sources 335,000.00 (5,862.50) == =_ =________ 329,137.50 Bonds Issued: 8/1/89 Project Completed: Late 1989 First Increment Available: 1991 First Principal: 2/1/92 Last Principal: 2/1/13 apitalized Interest 37,653.15 NET INTEREST COST: 7.603% st. Costs of Issuance 15,000.00 Average Cou on: 7.520% )ther Costs 0.00 p Iva i l ab le for Project _ 276, 483.75 F i l : taxexmpt s =s ='ssss ;= Prepared by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. ota 1 Uses 329,137.50 Financial Consulting Department 4/24/89 i T. 1 Tota 1 Col 0/S Available Year Date Income 8/1/89 1989 2/1/90 1990 2/1/91 0.00 1991 2/1/92 75,726.49 1992 2/1/93 75.726.49 1993 2/1/94 15.726.49 1994 2/1/95 75.126.49 1995 2/1/96 75.726.49 1996 211197 75,726.49 1997 2/1/98 75.726.49 1998 2/1/99 75,726.49 1999 2/1100 75.726.49 2000 211101 75.726.49 2001 2/1/02- 75.726.49 2002 2/1/03 75.726.49 2003 2/1/04 75,726.49 2004 2/1/05 75,726.49 2005 2/1/06 750126.49 2006 211107 75,726.49 2007 2/1/08 75.726.49 2008 2/1/09 75,726.49 1,363.076.17 -)OURCE & APPLICATION STATEMENT "ar Amount of Bonds (Less) Discount @ 1.75% rota l Sources ^ap i t.a 1 i zed Interest f-'st. Costs of Issuance ether Costs Available for Project i'ot a 1 Uses .City of Maplewood, Minnesota TIF Cash Flow Tax Increment Financing District a==.= azs- seas=:.: cs= a: s= sasssas= ssssssaassas =sassessassessasssamsaa sssss =xsaassssssssssssaesasss Estimated Debt Annual Cumulative Annual Cumulative Coupon Principal Interest Service Balance Balance . Coverage Coverage as= sz r: ss=== sasasaz asas= sz ssssssssaaassssassssssss ssssssssssssassasassassssssssssssssassssassss 57,420.00 19,140.00 19,140.00 (19,140.00) 38,280.00 0.000% 0.00 38.280.00 38.280.00 (38.280.00) 0.00 0.00 100.00 10.0004 10,000.00 38,280.00 48.280.00 27.446.49 27,446.49 156.85 156.85 10.000% 10,000.00 37,280.00 47 280.00 280446.49 55,892.97 160.17 218.22 10.000% 10,000.00 36,280.00 46,280.00 29.446.49 85,339.46 163.63 284.40 10.000% 10,000.00 35.280.00 45.280.00 300446.49 115,185.95 167.24 355.71 10.100% 10,000.00 34,280.00 44.280.00 310446.49 1470232.44 171.02 432.50 10.100% 159000.00 33.270.00 48,270.00 27,456.49 174,688.92 156.88 461.90 10.100% 15,000.00 31,155.00 46,755.00 28,971.49 203,660.41 161.96 535.59 10.200% 15.000.00 30,240.00 45.240.00 30,486.49 234.146.90 167.39 617.57 10.200% 15,000.00 28.710.00 43.110.00 32.016.49 266.163.38 173.25 708.93 10.200% 20.000.00 27.180.00 41.180.00 28,546.49 294,709.87 160.51 724.65 10.300% 20,000.00 25,140.00 45.140.00 30.586.49 3259296.36 167.76 820.64 10.400% 209000.00 23,080.00 43,080.00 32,646.49 357,942.85 175.78 930.88 10.500% 25,000.00 21,000.00 46,000.00 29,726.49 381,669.33 164.62 942.76 10.500% 30,000.00 18,375.00 48.375.00 27,351.49 415.020.82 156.54 957.92 10.500% 30.000.00 15.225.00 45.225.00 30.501.49 445.522.31 167.44 1,085.12 10.500% 35.000.00 12.075.00 47,075.00 28,651.49 474.173.80 160.86 1,107.27 10.500% 40.000.00 8,400.00 48.400.00 27,326.49 501.500.28 156.46 1.136.16 10.500% 400000.00 4,200.00 44.200.00 31.526.49 533,026.77 171.33 1.305.94 rss= ss =s=sssssasarsssss =sasssasass sssss: sssss: sssss ���tessssssssss =sasssasssssssssssassssssssssss 3700000.00 517,470.00 8870470.00 Bonds Issued: 8/1/89 Project Completed: Late 1989 370, 000.00 First Increment Available: 1991 (6.475.00) First Principal: 2/1/92 =ssa = :ss = :a Last Principal: 2/1/09 363,525.00 57,420.00 NET INTEREST COST:10.524% 31,105.00 Average Coupon: 10.412% 0.00 275,000.00 File..tax275 ==sa= :s =a= Prepared by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. 363t525.00 Financial Consulting Department 4/24/89 City of Maplewood. Minnesota Calculation of Available Tax Increment Classification: Residential Non - Homestead Apts. w/ 4 or more units. 1 -uture Market Value: $ 1#800#000 3ase Value Adj Factor 0.004 Inflation Factor: 0.00% ;. first increment available: payable 1991 ile..tax275 'repared by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. inanc is 1 Consulting Department 4/24/89 Inflation Factor: 0.00% 100.00000% T. I Col D/S Original Tax s: Future Market xs sssssas asas sssssssssssss Future sassss Captured = =s =sazsssaassssse Tax =aassss= pr ojected Y Year - _ - Date Capacity Value Tax Capacity Y Tax Capacity Rate_ Tax 8/1189 Increment 1989 1990 2/1/90 2/1/91 272 1,800 000 73,800 73,528 1991 1992 2/1/92 2/1/93 272 272 1.800,000. 1,800,000 73,800 73,800 73,528 13,528 0.000% 0 1993 2/1/94 272 212 1,800,000 1,$00,000 73,800 73,528 102.990% 102.990% 75 726 75,726 1994 1995 2/1/95 2/1/96 272 108000000 73,800 730800 13,528 73,528 102.990% 102.990% 75o726 1996 1997 2/1/97 2/1/98 272 272 1,8000000 1,800,000 73,800 13,800 73,528 73,528 102.990%. 75,726 75,126 1998 2/1/99 272 272 1,8006000 1,8004000 73,800 73,528 102.990% 102.990% 75,726 15,726 1999 2000 2/1/00 2/1/01 272 1,800,000 73,800 73,800 13,528 73,528 102.990% 102.990% 15,726 2001 2002 211102 2/1/03 272 212 1,8000000 108000 000 73,800 � 73,800 73,528 73,528 102.990% 75,726 75.726 2003 2/1/04 212 272 1,800,000 1,800,000 73,800 73,528 102.990 102.990% 75,726 75,726 2004 2005 2/1/05 2/1/06 272 1,800,000 73.800 73.800 73,528 739528 102.990% 102.990% 75,726 2006 2007 211107 2/1/08 272 272 1,800,000 1,8000000 73,800 730800 73,528 739528 102.990% 75,126 75,126 2008 2/1/09 . 272 272 1,8006000 118000000 73,800 13,528` 102.990% 102.990% 75,726 75,726 ts= sass= s-;= axszss:= ao=== 7 3,800 sss= az�= ss= sss: 73,528 esssss= zaasasa= 102.990% = =� =sazzs =sssssszsssesrsss 75,726 Classification: Residential Non - Homestead Apts. w/ 4 or more units. 1 -uture Market Value: $ 1#800#000 3ase Value Adj Factor 0.004 Inflation Factor: 0.00% ;. first increment available: payable 1991 ile..tax275 'repared by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. inanc is 1 Consulting Department 4/24/89 SECTION V TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 Adopted May 8, 1989] t, 5. 1 Statement of Objectives. See Section I. Subsection 1.5, Development Program for Development District No. 1. 5.2 Development Program. 1a r See Section I, Subsection 1.3, Development Program for Development District No. 1. 5.3 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO, 1 -3 Housing District No. 1 -3 is made up of certain parcels located within Development District No. 1. The specific parcels contained in the Tax Increment District are described on Exhibit G. 5.4 Parcels to be Acquired. In connection with Economic Development District No. 1 -3 the City does not intend to acquire and reconvey any parcels to specific developers. t 5.5 Development Activity in Development District No. 1 for wriich Contracts Have Been Signed. (a) Zantigo Restaurant on County Road was developed by Zantigo Mexican Restaurants, Inc. on County Road D, West of White Bear Avenue. The contractor was William Kranz Construction and the cost of the project was $260,000. (b) Maple Ridge Square Shopping Center was - developed by Curt Johnson and Joe Weis - Weis Builders, Inc. at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and White Bear Avenue. The contractor was Weis Builders and the cost of the project was $2,318,383. 52 . (c) Maple Ridge Apartments was developed by Podawiltz Development Company on County Road D. west of White Bear Avenue. The contractor was Avon Lumber Company, Inc. arid the cost of the project was $2,800,000. (d) Maple Ridge Estate Apartments was developed by Maple Ridge Development Corporation at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue. The contractor was Steve Haight Construction and the cost of the project was $3,999,000. (e) An addition to Maplewood Mall is being developed by CPI. The contractor is Kraus Anderson and the cost of the project is $2,075,000. (f) A Main Street Store at Maplewood Mall is being developed by Federated Department Stores. The contractor is Sheehy Construction and the cost of the project is $2 , 000 , 0.00 . 1 5.6 Other Specific Development Exoected to Occur Within Development District No. 1. (a) The development of a 59 unit Senior Citizen housing complex (known as the Cottages of Maplewood) is being proposed by Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership; (b) The development of the Crossings Mall to be located adjacent to Maplewood Mall; (c) It is expected that additional development may occur in Development District No. 1 in the future. The nature and timing of further development cannot accurately be predicted at this time. 5.7 Estimated Cost of Project Costs and Supportive Data. The estimated costs of the public improvements and recreational facility set forth in the Development Program to be made within Development District No. 1 and financed by tax increments to be derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -3 (together with any available tax increments from Economic Development District No, 1 -1, Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -2 and Housing District No. 3 within Development District No. 1) are $2,530,578. 53 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY $2,530,578.00 LEGAL FEES, PLANNING FEES, COSTS OF ISSUANCE & CONTINGENCY $ 30,000.00 BOND DISCOUNT $ 43,575.00 INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCREMENT TO FULLY FUND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST $300,847.00 TOTAL AMOUNTS OF BONDS TO BE SOLD $2,861,425.00 SUPPORTIVE DATA FOR ESTIMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS OR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UNDER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IT BASIS FOR ESTIMATE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND Estimates by City Staff RECREATIONAL FACILITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Estimates of Project Costs for legal assistance, bond issuance costs, planning provided by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR The amount of capitalized interest TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCRE- will be equal to an amount suf- MENT TO FULLY FUND ficient to pay interest on the PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST Tax Increment Bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increments to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes., Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. 54 5.8 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. It is anticipated that Tax Increment Bonds in the amount of $2,861,425 will be incurred with respect to this portion of the-development activities to be undertaken within Development District No. 1. 5.9 -- Sources of Revenue It is anticipated that the sources of revenue to pay the costs associated with this portion of the development activities to be undertaken within Development District No. 1 are Tax Increment Bond proceeds. 5.10 Original Gross Tax Ca acity. 1t. The original gross tax capacity of all taxable property in Economic Development District No. 1 -3 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1988 with respect to the gross tax capacity of such property as of January 2, 1988, for taxes payable in 1989 is estimated to be $102,705.750 5.11 Estimated Captured Gross Tax Capacity. Each year the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total gross tax capacity of Economic Development District No. 1 -3 to calculate the tax increment payable to the City of Maplewood. In any year in which there is an increase in total gross tax capacity in Economic Development District No. 1 -3 above the original gross tax capacity, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total gross tax capacity in Economic Development District No. 1 -3 declines below the original gross tax capacity, no gross tax capacity will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the gross tax capacity was certified, the amount the gross tax capacity has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court- ordered abatements. 55 Upon completion of the development expected d to occur within Economic Dev elopment District No. 1 -3 the City estimates the gross tax capacity of the Property within Economic Develo pment District No. 1 -3 to be $1,029,000. The captured gross tax capacity completion ' Y on P pletion i.s estimated to annually approximate $664,134.45. This amount will be captured for up to eight ' ears from t first Tax Increme � he receipt of the Increment or ten years from the creation of Economic Development District No. 1 -3 or until the Tax Increment rement Bonds are retired. The city quests 100% of the available increase in gross tax capacity from Economic Development ' p ent District No. 1 -3 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing ancing Plan. 5.1.2 Type of Tax Increment Financin Distr' 1 � C t . Pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 12 of the Act the City finds that Economic Development Dist qualifies as an "economic District No. 1 -3 omi.c development district": 1. Economic Development District No. 1 -3 qualifies as an "economic development . .p district" because "...it will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state it � or will result in increased employment in the municipality, or it will result in preservation and enhancement of the a tax base of the municipality. 5.13 Duration of Tax Increment Financi s n g Districts The Act allows "economic development districts" to remain in existence for a period of u to eight t o f the first P ea g years from the receipt st Tax Increment or ten years from the creation of Economic Development District No. 1 -3. B these limitations Based on it is anticipated that Economic Development District No. 1 -3 will remain in effect until 1999. 5.14 Estimated Impact of Tax Increment Financin The estimated impact of Economic Development p ent District No, 1 -3 on the other taxing wme g within Economic Development nt District No. 1 -3 is set forth on Table X. 5.15 Cash Flow Analysis. See Table XI. 56 5 . 16 Use of Tax Increment The City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the captured gross tax capacity of taxable property located in Economic Development District No. 1 -3. The tax increments derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -3, shall be used for the following activities: 1. To pay principal and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds. 2. To finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs of Development District No, 1. 3. To finance or otherwise pay premiums for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters, 462C, 469, or both. 4. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securin g the payment when due of the principal and interest on the bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C 469 th. or both, P 5. To finance project costs described in this Tax Increment Financing Plan. 6. To finance other purposes as may be allowed by the Act. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other purposes prohibited by Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the Act. 5.17 Prior Planned Improvements. The City shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its .notice of district enlargement with a listing of all properties wthin Economic Development District No. 1 -3, for which building permits have been issued durin g g the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan by the City. The County Auditor shall increase the original gross tax capacity of Economic Development District No. 1 -3, by the gross tax capacity of the improvements for which the building permit was issued. 57 5.18 Limitation on Qualification of Tax Increment Development on a parcel located within Housing District No. 1 -3 by the City or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with this Tax Increment Financing Plan shall occur within four ( 4 ) years of the date of certification of the original gross tax capacity. For the purposes of this section the term "development" shall mean.including demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property, or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent to the parcel. Development shall not include the installation of utility service including sewer and water systems. If development has not commenced within this period no additional increment shall be taken from that parcel and the original gross tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original gross tax capacity of Economic Development District No. 1 -3. If the City or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences development, the City shall certify the gross tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue and add it to the original gross tax capacity of Economic Development District No. 1 -3. 5.19 Modifications of Tax Increment Financing Districts. .. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of Development District No. 1 or Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination or capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original tax increment financing plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured gross tax capacity to be retained by the City, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be acquired by the authority shall be approved.upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a Tax Increment Financing District may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original gross tax capacity by the county auditor. Economic Development District No. 1 -3 may therefore be expanded until 1994. A No 5.20 Limitation on Administrative Expense s In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 14 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures of an authority other than amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing aterials and services including g architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real P property in the district, relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount-bonds issued pursuant to Section 469.178. Administrative expenses includes amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. No tax increment shall be used to pay any administrative expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. 5.21 ONO Limitation on Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 1, "no tax increment shall be paid to an authority three years from the date of certification by the County Auditor unless within the three -year period (1) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178 or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued,'pursuant to Sections 469.152 through 469.165, prior to the effective date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired property within the district; or (3) the authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvemewnts within the district..." The City must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, or construct or cause public improvements to be constructed by 1992 or the County Auditor may dissolve the applicable.Tax Increment Financing District, 5.22 Limitation on Qualification of Property in Tax Increment Financing Districts Not Subject to Improvement Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd . 6 , " if , a f ter f our years f rom the date of * cert i f is at ion of the original gross tax capacity of the tax increment financing district..., no demolition, rehabilitation or 59 renovation of parcel or other site preparation including improvement of a street adjacent to a property but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original gross tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original gross tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently.commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall certify the gross tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original gross tax capacity of the tax increment f inanc ing district. 5.23 .. Excess Tax Increments. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, the City shall use the excess amount to: 1. prepay the outstanding bonds; 2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore; 3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond; 4. repay any loans including interest on these loans; or 5. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their tax capacity rates. In addition, the City may choose to modify the financing plan as described in Part II, 2.18, in order to provide further public improvements within the development district. .I 5.24 Administration of Tax Increment Financing Districts. Administration of Economic Development District No. 1-3 will be handled by the Office of the City Manager. The tax increment received as a result of increases in the gross tax capacity of Economic Development District No. 1 -3 will be maintained in a special account separate from,all other municipal accounts and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities identified in the Tax Increment Finance Plan. - 5.25 Annual Disclosure Requirements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 5, the City must file with the State Auditor on or before July 1, an annual financial report for all Tax Increment Financing Districts. The report shall also be filed with the school board and county board. The report shall as nearly as possible: 1. Provide for full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in each Tax Increment Financing District; 2. Permit comparison and reconciliation with the City's accounts and financial reports; 3. Permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of each Tax Increment Financing District, including a single Tax Increment Financing District that is part of a multidistrict project or that is funded in part or whole through the use of a development account funded with tax increments from. other Tax Increment Financing Districts or with other public money; and 4. Be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the report shall contain the following inf ormation : 1. The original gross tax capacity of the Tax Increment Financing District; 2. The captured gross tax capacity of the Tax Increment Financing District, including the amount of any 61 captured gross tax capacity shared with other tax districts; 3. The outstanding principal amount of bonds issued or other loans incurred to finance project costs in the Tax Increment Financing District; 4. For the reporting period and for the duration of the Tax Increment Financing District, the amount budgeted under the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and the actual amount expended for, at least, the following categories: A. Acquisition of land and buildings through condemnation or purchase; B. Site improvements or preparation costs; C. Installation of public utilities or other public improvements; and D. Administrative costs, including the allocated cost of the City; 5. For properties sold to developers, the total cost of the property to the City and the price paid by the developer; 6. -The amount of tax exempt obligations, other than those reported under clause (3), that were issued on behalf of private entities for facilities located in the Tax Increment Financing District. 62 CITY 01F MAPLEWOOL), MINNESOTA TABLE X DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON TAX BASE, ORIGINAL DISRICT AS FUTURE IDISRICT AS JURISDICTION TAX BASE TAX CAPACITY PERCENTAGE OF JURISDICTION TAX PERCENTAGE oy CITY OF Maplewood 14-320% CAPACITY JURISDICTION COUNTY Ramsey 454x178r817 102r706 0,,02261% 11029gro00 0.22656% CITY OF Maplewood 34f925,852 SCHOOL DISTRICT #622 56r525j713 SCHOOL DISTRICT #622 38x84$ x52 (Ramsey only) 102,706 0o29407% 102t706 0.18170% 102,706 0,26438% DF-VELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON TAX CAPACITY RATES: 1z029f000 1j029r000 1j029r000 -2.,94624% lo8204 2.64877% JURISDICTION CURRENT RATE CURRENT TAXES GENERATED POTE21TIAL TAXES GERMIATED COUNTY OF Ramsey 28,380% • 29r148 292,030 CITY OF Maplewood 14-320% 14,70-7 147r353 0111ER (1) 6.526% 6r703 67,153 SCHOOL DISTRICT1622 53.764% 55r219 553r232 q 00- W tMi TABLE XI City of Maplewood, Minnesota TIF Cash Flow Tax Increment Financing District aos mum :z =ass== T.I ==am=a a ass %sse=saass=sasses=ssssaama Projected Late 1989 *aa e aU aft am== aa=am==rsssssaausamsassslssass% First Principal: 2/1/92 sasssssssss lsss�sssssssssssssssssaa 2/1/99 Col Year D/S Date Tax Increment Estimated Coupon Principal Interest Debt Service Annual Balance Cumulative Balance Annual umu 1 a t � ve Cumulative s: =%sass =seas =ass =sss ssasacssssls! lssssslsslssslssssssassssssssssss:: Coverage Coverage ge 8/1/89 ssslssssssslssssssssssssssss�essssessssssssssssssslslslsssss 300,847.50 ' 1989 2/1/90 100,282.50 100,282.50 (100.282.50) 200 565.00 1990 2/1/91 0.00 0.000% 0.00 200,565.00 2000565.00 (200 565.00) 0.00 0.00 100.00 1991 2/1/92 637,094.71 6.800% 405.000.00 200,565.00 605,565.00 31,529.71 31.529.71 105.21 0 1 5.21 1992 2/1/93 6030515.20 6.800: 4304000.00 173,025.00 603,025.00 490.20 32,019.91 100.08 105.31 1993 2/1/94 569,472.13 6.900% 425,000.00 1430785.00 568,785.00 687.73 32,707.64 100.12 105.75 1994 2/1/95 527,260.06 6.900% 4100000.00 114,460.00 524 460.00 2.800.06 35 507.70 0 l 0.53 106.77 1995 2/1/96 4740916.36 6.900: 385,000.00 86,170.00 4710170.00 3,746.36 39t254-06 100.80 108.33 1996 2/1/97 4100010.17 7.000% 3500000.00 59,605.00 409,605.00 405.17 39.659.22 100.10 109.68 1997 2/1/98 3290526.49 7.000% 2901000.00 35,1.05.00 325,105.00 4.421.49 44,080.71 101.36 113.56 1998 2/1/99 229,726.72 7.050% 210,000.00 14,805.00 224,805.00 4,921.72 49 002.43 102.19 2 19 121.80 sesssas :ae : : =asa saes: ssssssssasssss!! 3,781,522.43 s! a= sa= ss! assslsssss: 2,905,000.00 sssssslssesssssssslesslsssls .e :la!lssss 1,128,367.50 4,033,367.50 !sass :lssssslsslssslsls!lssssss SOURCE b APPLICATION STATEMENT Par Amount of Bonds 2,905,000.00 (Less) Discount @ 1.50: (43,575.00) _l.... =.!=lea Total Sources 2,861,425.00 Capitalized Interest 300,847.50 Est. Costs of Issuance 30,000.00 Other Costs 0.00 Available for Project 2.530,577.50 Total Uses 2,861,425.00 Bonds Issued: 8/1/89 Project Completed: Late 1989 First Increment Available: 1991 First Principal: 2/1/92 Last Principal: 2/1/99 NET INTEREST COST: 7.202% • Average Coupon: 6.934% File.crosing Prepared by Miller b Schroeder F inane is 1, Inc. Financial Consulting Department 3/23/89 bd r H City of Maplewood, Minnesota PAGE 2 Calculation of Available Tax Increment =a === aaa= .z..ss. =s =sa =c = =as =sacs =s- =s Inflation Factor: 0.00% ==a = =sss:s ssssss 71.69800% T.1 Base Original as== s=as==========s Future a== a= ss= s= Future nou n==sssss=smasas Captured =ss= s = =sarssm Tax == ====sons Projected Col D/S Market Tax Market Tax Tax Capacity Tax Year : = = =saa =sa Date =s; arcs sss = Value = =x =assts =saaan=sasasss=s= Capacity Value Capacity Capacity Rate Increment 8/1/89 :sac = =asx =sscacassas =a= sa an= ca =s=t :oasts::= =ass =sssssssea sass :ssssss =ssssss =ssss 1989 2/1/90 1,956,300.00 102,705.75 19,6006000.00 1,029,000.00 664,134.45 1990 2/1/91 2,4250812.00 127.355.13 19,600 000.00 1,029,000.00 646,461.34 0.000% 0.00 1991 2/1/92 3,008,006.88 156.416.36 19,600,000.00 10019;200.00 618,598.62 102.990% 637.094.71 1992 2/1/93 3,729,928.53 192,091.32 19,600,000.00 18009,400.00 585,993.98 102.990% 603.515.20 1993 2/1/94 4,625,111.38 238,193.24 19,600,000.00 1,009,400.00 552,939.83 102.990% 5699472.73 1994 2/1/95 5,735,138.11 295.359.61 19.600,000.00 1,009.400.00 511,952.68 102.990% 527,260.06 1995 2/1/96 7,111,511.26 366,245.92 19.600,000.00 1,0090400.00 461,128.61 102.990% 474,916.36 1996 2/1/97 8,818,348.36 454,144.94 19.600,000.00 1,009,400.00 3980106.77 102.990% 410,010.17 1997 2/1/98 10,934,751.96 563.139.73 19,600,000.00 1,009,400.00 319,959.69 102.990% 329,526.49 1998 2/1/99 13,559,092.43 698,293.26 19,600,000.00 1,009,400.00 223,051.31 102.990% 2290726.72 Classification: Conn /Ind Non- Preferred Base Market Value: $ 1,956,300 Future Market Value: $ 19,600,000 Base Value. Adj Factor 24.00% Inflation Factor: 0.00% First increment available: payable 1991 File.crosing Prepared by Miller b Schroeder Financial, Inc . F inanc is 1 Consulting Department 3/23/89 .i l . J VI i+1itJ�•Jl�1r� V UV • ` t t IL ow 4w ow l000 ■ r i •w Nas as 4� ............ O wea •�wr , ' ••-•• -I�ee■ .w w0 Gave ...........I•• . J • .. ' e mummo own 00 � .w are •.w _ • ! C j some � l 1 _.._. . Ilk © a a 0 .� • . rte.•{ r. • same MW �• ! � • . ..�� .+ .Owl 1111 eOl.IF SAM j ly• 1 / •' I • ' • t1 I 1 Awe 1s• ! Ilafeees V If 1 calla - ' _.. w• » to raw v now Exhibit A - eflfll .�� .N• • N M » If • 3 • n 11 ... . r was l ± .at 1 n i eo 1 � i e i Exhibit A Exhibit B Zantigo: The easterly 145 feet of that part of Lot 1, Block 3, Viking Development Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence on an assumed bearing of West, along the south line of said Lot 1, a distance of 285.00 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence on a bearing of North a distance of 236.91 f eet , to-the north line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating. Maple Ridge Square: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying east of the West line of the Northeast Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 and lying south of the North line of the South four (4) acres of the West Half (1/2) of the North Half (1 /2) of the East Half (1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 (torrens property); together with that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying sough of the South line of Lot 1 of said Block 1 and the westerly extension thereof except that part of said Lot 2 lying east of the West Line of the Northeast Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (1 /4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 and lying south of the North line of the South four (4) acres of the West Half (1/2) of the North Half (1/2) of the East Half (1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 (abstract property); together with that part of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall, according to the recorded plat thereof lying west of the West line of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 (torrens property); together with that part of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall, according to the recorded plat thereof lying s I lip east of the West line of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 (abstract property).. 4 ,, Exhibit C Maple Ridge Apartments - County Road D: That part of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 lying south of the right -of -way of U.S. Highway No. 694, all in Section 34, Township 30, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota containing approximately 5.06 acres. Exhibit D Maple Ridge Estates Apartments - Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue: Beginning on the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 29, Range 22, at a point in the center of the Stillwater Road, which is 227 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South along the Easterly line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Westerly along the southerly line of.the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Northerly along the.Westerly line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the centerline of Stillwater Road; thence Easterly along the centerline of Stillwater Road to the point of beginning; except therefrom the following: That part taken for Registered Land Survey No. 21 and also except part taken for Registered Land Survey No. 137, and also except that part lying Southeasterly of State Highway No. 212, and also except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South right -of -way line of Stillwater Avenue, a /k /a Stillwater Road Connection, and the West right -of -way line of State Highway No. 212; thence westward along the south right -of -way of Stillwater Avenue a distance of 50 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the West right -of -way line of State.Highway No. 212, which point is 50 feet Southwest of the point of beginning, thence Northeasterly.to the point of beginning. Subject to all easements of record. al EXHIBIT E Main Street Store - Maplewood Mall That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 7, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition; thence on an assumed bearing of S 3degrees 32' 27" W, along the easterly line of said Lot 7, a distance of 258.25 feet, thence on a bearing of East, 44.08 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence N3 degrees 32' 27" E., 282.72 feet; thence on a tangential curve to the right for a distance of 304.55 feet, radius of said curve is 654.67 feet; thence on a bearing of East, not tangent to last described curve, 220.00 feet; thence on a bearing of South, 27-90 feet; thence on a bearing of East, 64.97 feet; thence on a bearing of South, 543.50 feet; thence on a bearing of West, 390.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Subject to easements, if any. Mall Addition - Maplewood Mall That portion of Lot 5, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition on which the Mall Addition will be constructed. A separate legal description for the Mall Addition will be established. 60 CA or�ti<Yi� 5'0 go. 0 to �• oor _'•/• h •S•'G«1•� S oo Ma O W JJ 7lµl'J 'uA: � s ito, �a�i�iro+r�i f M^ y O A wge,:"'s f ;:ter. M $iwy ti <�y h M o p �J► • O w O N �s►o+o A o o F III i Y O fIY M 'S 8� • d Y oft i fA 1 B M n � :ro 5° s v N 0 P L n rel D to � Q m�, m m� O y 1p A s 8 cZw� a1 0 � •r .. N � rn T In 0 o r me �L (, 0Gf- i o � N F L •r y N Pi• P o~ up N L �W 1 L v 0 � FJ F IDr r 8 v ki M N A G L D A m ( n of �• „ n ri• -• •1 tl r t .) o o • o m to •r. 1) In P. U' %r to w1 f • ` a t•+r V Nr; �•�a • +a root•, o ro 0 0 F m /- ) v m 0 IV m to 1 f }p n r o G m n 1 O n - f M VI � V• ro •• O N In µ u W o ro V] t~i �1f to To to -.1 O n 0 C1 p` O N O •♦ Y f Mr • • •fC ' M 1.1 •• 1 R j nM• • '' nd [ tf ON [ ro r1 1^ O • A A •O n FP C ro U • A J " • 0 T• 1 - O RNA u U Y O m � 't M O O y O O o •<• � • P •• A O P • A a 5 1f w m •i 0 e U f, N O '♦ Z O rn S to 6 bi ro m r •n !i v �•• f �-ro pi .f• raf'f �, 0 to 7-0 O 1iC (i G O< LF y 1 ro f ro ro m C4 It, ru / !• r •1 A O P. :1 tl O 11 r a •1 P O O N m O a G C1 - r .0 F+ roro .•0 fro 1-4 It rr4 1•1•1•C A O pnp ,f •1tl nI+i N[ O. .1 It �• p� O t Fa j' n Wn W O •1C0 / 0 f 1-'IvJ Nm p l ad b`Ja to n n O ro ro ro 0 0 ro m p Y• R .1 �n . ,.. ,u q f n w 7. N t) }I A N R A i% J e. N �J N 0 oF• m {L 1 A J W O h ^1 (. r Vl o o N o m a •� 1� w ro N' 1 •p1 • J' •1' 1 tf M N '1 O t• C ro N 4 i; �t w !Ji •a tl 1• Iv �` N f; �• * a NI IC F•• to ro p th N [T O A r1 RI f1 •- 1� ^ •t m <• A u O O 01 O r• i1 a1• ro~ s 1 lb O r A J o A' h :j r• t. X j v H f• A l •1 to Cn p O V v O m O A tAO f .i; f p A t1 T r • O ro C� : r. a m � � •1 f 'w � 7 rO • �ro a Fi r •• . b r"t•/ f• P :1 N GA w 0 00 a to F•1 . r A ro n `• 1. a 7 r n C cf (7, LP H P O oO N to t hi U s r, ro m A N J of r 0 'b A f O q In < f F O m•. • 1'Sn u• 1 .+ o r• ro •f a M tr C N to w '1 ) A ro O N g W dry•• ro m P m 1� a , U ; f k• •1 , i o to '1 ro LO L 9 e v `r 0 7 �{� jI o !O c I n w r �• L r O L tyq� N2p H � rr r O S n ro O few. Y ro •t a f• fI p V 4 z m r 1 _• ^ r O f) �• u p � m ^ c � t1` m n O r C A 6 M ^ G Q I�;'; .< n a 4A S n y�•f v n d n w M n i n O a _ p w 6 C C ^ N H < to v n A V r• - r I O V m r •1 a o cto 1 f i C tA n o A ``' � 0 II •` b ly IIIIII III N n = Z d 6 t n r fi p n A e ~ m R rtf 1 o Zi o 2 N 8 0V � i n 6 1 00 60 CA or�ti<Yi� 5'0 go. 0 to �• oor _'•/• h •S•'G«1•� S oo Ma O W JJ 7lµl'J 'uA: � s ito, �a�i�iro+r�i f M^ y O A wge,:"'s f ;:ter. M $iwy ti <�y h M o p �J► • O w O N �s►o+o A o o F III i Y O fIY M 'S 8� • d Y oft i fA 1 B M n � :ro 5° s v N 0 P L n rel D to � Q m�, m m� O y 1p A s 8 cZw� a1 0 � •r .. N � rn T In 0 o r me �L (, 0Gf- i o � N F L •r y N Pi• P o~ up N L �W 1 L v 0 � FJ F IDr r 8 v ki M N A G L D A m ( n of �• „ n ri• -• •1 tl r t .) o o • o m to •r. 1) In P. U' %r to w1 f • ` a t•+r V Nr; �•�a • +a root•, o ro 0 0 F m /- ) v m 0 IV m to 1 f }p n r o G m n 1 O n - f M VI � V• ro •• O N In µ u W o ro V] t~i �1f to To to -.1 O n 0 C1 p` O N O •♦ Y f Mr • • •fC ' M 1.1 •• 1 R j nM• • '' nd [ tf ON [ ro r1 1^ O • A A •O n FP C ro U • A J " • 0 T• 1 - O RNA u U Y O m � 't M O O y O O o •<• � • P •• A O P • A a 5 1f w m •i 0 e U f, N O '♦ Z O rn S to 6 bi ro m r •n !i v �•• f �-ro pi .f• raf'f �, 0 to 7-0 O 1iC (i G O< LF y 1 ro f ro ro m C4 It, ru / !• r •1 A O P. :1 tl O 11 r a •1 P O O N m O a G C1 - r .0 F+ roro .•0 fro 1-4 It rr4 1•1•1•C A O pnp ,f •1tl nI+i N[ O. .1 It �• p� O t Fa j' n Wn W O •1C0 / 0 f 1-'IvJ Nm p l ad b`Ja to n n O ro ro ro 0 0 ro m p Y• R .1 �n . ,.. ,u q f n w 7. N t) }I A N R A i% J e. N �J N 0 oF• m {L 1 A J W O h ^1 (. r Vl o o N o m a •� 1� w ro N' 1 •p1 • J' •1' 1 tf M N '1 O t• C ro N 4 i; �t w !Ji •a tl 1• Iv �` N f; �• * a NI IC F•• to ro p th N [T O A r1 RI f1 •- 1� ^ •t m <• A u O O 01 O r• i1 a1• ro~ s 1 lb O r A J o A' h :j r• t. X j v H f• A l •1 to Cn p O V v O m O A tAO f .i; f p A t1 T r • O ro C� : r. a m � � •1 f 'w � 7 rO • �ro a Fi r •• . b r"t•/ f• P :1 N GA w 0 00 a to F•1 . r A ro n `• 1. a 7 r n C cf (7, LP H P O oO N to t hi U s r, ro m A N J of r 0 'b A f O q In < f F O m•. • 1'Sn u• 1 .+ o r• ro •f a M tr C N to w '1 ) A ro O N g W dry•• ro m P m 1� a , U ; f k• •1 , i o to '1 ro 030\Orl-1 SYOiyYYY Za�nl 11111 Or; .,1 itiv., cy 1wer� •gory\ aav�nwa� o„/ ;,•+•..fl•r.: oPwl. Kawory 'iiw,1J :.�e^mrt y aw.r pa•.a\7sr -� :wp./ rn++a rairw ' +\ w\ .•a. » wPS .Y\ a�.n nr . Y \ a, Yd\. W.Y. r Y Y.•••I... \w... ...K•'Y.W Yn .w\ ynW Y..q a 'aY3PpY T Yn•• Y ari t'!(i\ T •P•aA • waa •Y•n nwi (Y'(9! P .w•a • f•r r\w �•w {'Xli Y .WiA . SlY{ •.wai \aYl (q'(yi a 9 MW .WVa \i w\fY{ P •YaYf Yip T1 YS P Yur \•r'ML •a I• A° f•.gra •� w aYY ari rraa( iP wrs iwi (: sfwa • w a�Paa wR1V P aYlaw 1Y•1"• }.Y r •C ••� W KYPY •a YAPS P:"IM f••fS3.Y Ya• iY an °a Y••w'1i •O K Pa.YP awl M aW r K '1Pww• �r 'aY_r .� a� wa• Y f•KY. P. •wwW rMw as Yn -'•aY• A w M anal lY Mtw aq,rllYa •ra M •iaa a� ll �f.T1 •Y'WYTi' 1WOy n .•l nwa.rw f. 7c.,,Y••.Y�... \• YMa.. -a`• .•, is +Y.a ♦ .. ♦�. Koaw] 4� Y• Y t na, .�. p •b � ♦-_♦.q » ..a T. Al f,a Kawi '{ Pa••s T a ••clap it P ir: 1 {'{St r .r YS T ar; \P'Lii s•K •fi T { Prl wi ,wry '6awa 4�f a1 h?YA �•• T• Y :Wa„• M •Aa• YIiNY lY waaaP. M T MY•r afy; :Y iPFaa•Y T_rr:71 Ya al\ iaK yYa ' .ail SaY n xv P: +.+. nod- �_�aocr. rw nfir • w sY :\•3RT ..Q -aC i O YPYf T aw T •Kt +A t ieP i;rr, tar,• Yea Y.•••a T t•u . \•. � M T Yaywa 1Yl 'r• )PE • . M•Y0y .fin P rY�Yw a[+fR +HM vs •aI .P.Y •1 C�wL •i PfaK ( T :•LwJ••+ 1•Y:.JY R1 T = SK'-,P L A b K P•PSP YP! T a a1 • •gYiM P aY(A 'aminl SYl {a'(f[ tel Y:. YPP�•aP.Pal •YM (�( K •3• a• Sln Y fYtr a cYYn T PS:s_" YA A•Iw'irMl fwd w9F•w PPKP: •P Y YY fwd l :f�rY.� "aa•tIYaR ul SILOOM -sw, n suo"a NO SRLO#M .•� Ol snow" y wo Guam" rO S31OWM •p4 Wa; OE = 43u! l - 31VOS mfq .r, Y; e,aN 1• fawaq 3y 1 1 4f �•� � ' { i i „ i,, 1`, ►+' �: \�.._�' tip^ : \ � ti � � � + l1 •►r.•��... VI•. ., t:nTt l -li►r� •r 11'x1 ► 111. ^ �� ht � �ArI o . A. �.' - '� C '�' l �• � tip[. , z~ 1� I f Mi LU of tct►>.c • 2(as61 too -•� �1�114• E1�� �' _ �� ;:.' ra lot f V I A r �. ,» yr N1' �' /_!1% . • . ' ••'7 . r► lam'" ft j •� ( ---� 1 • �: r ~ •• to �l t Z ' i NA 1 1 • 04119.14 lit R >r t � ,. � i : Res .� � �t� r «•,�� E � .. � � ,�R� � � � � �� w �� � r. fir• «• 1 i • �" f M �� � � ,�i � ter• � • � ago��� ! t� .R �!� R! � ire'. M � "y '�t �.���:�r�'.�•• R � � .� i � M Y V.. ; ft 1 .0, PSI i 0 N M M M M w _ Des :r p',.lm EXHIBIT F i &t Part of the .0110..E descelbed %:-act 1yL%C Sc4*► o! twe =en .erline of "oot -'= ,;ve ue, a= s::::ect to said ave. ue east=e.n:, in Ramsey County, �Inzesota, except a Lart 243.63 tee. the -eof: Subject to ease=ents, a pa."cel of land situated i.Z t..t 4o.W=WVat orie•n -J rter of t2he Nortteast on"uarter of Bec',.10a 2, ".bti'aS: ip 2r, range 22, =rO particularly described as fo :io::_: Co=encing at a point 33 feet South of the Nor e"zoast comer of said 'Northwest one - - uartcr of tie `:ortneast one - quarter o: Sec t,:on 2, t:en%e :uuuuab ;ooutherly alone ttiE Salt line of said Nortnwest one-quarter of the Nort::east one -quarter, Sec pion 2, a ::stance of 12".3- feed- ., to point, thence :ysu ing Oster :y and par -' Ial L•i- P the Sout:^ line of said NorL'%wett one — quarter of t1e ' :ortvjeast one— gsdrter of Sectloa t, a distance of 527.12 feet %o a point; -ice —• ; - - .. Las* tie. • .d NorLierly 6ri! para:lel w'1 ti. \rie Las r link of said Nor%r. -West or e- cluarter o: tie :1orL4,ear t one- quart 4L Of Sec UM :, a distance of 1292.74 :feet to tie Sos.,herly boundary o. ..o.�.,.y oad "D" tnewce rur. - tre of :runty cf W:2Z.2L : eel •.r, tt a port o'' !; : 4 a 4ft e.10" Ia . Description: FAZC E%.- 8 :'hat Part of tk4e followins des::ibed act :yi,ns SouA� of th* centerline of Woo3lYnn avenue, and subject to said avenue eas=er.t, LA Aamsey COU-I ry, Y' A=esota: The Soul +t of t:.e East 203,62 feet of the Nor'ui 1325.74 ♦ of the Northwest I of the 'Northeast = of Section 2, Tow•nsrip 29, Range 22, subject to sascftZts of reco:•d. PRo PaSe D Sc.R PZ' �•J : flA R C E�. C THE �Qce 6� �kv t3Zt.'�`� E Rsc Zcv3, X34 �� oi-� W ear 79o.9OZ '�1 ¢ N o P-Tt-* %0 i ST Q v► /fir QTF,Q Ok '}'`l Q i� O Q T'�-1 � ►AST Q u A tZTGR O� S �:.. CT 1 O 1`1 7 Z� TO.�.�h► 5ee�p �q� G. F. ZZ . gut E�4�'. �T 'to E 4,%F t NT . TIM E O&*r 20.4:'o Z e v-44 o f Mat part of the following described tract lying South of the center line of u00011 yen A'ww. w, pad pubjtct to said avenue easement, in Ramey Conntyt Himesotal A. parcel of land situated in the Northwest Quarter of . Us NOrthewd quarter of Secties. to Township 191 Pe 22.' We parttouLarly described as fellow: Ugmlft at ,a point 33 feet South amd 527.26 toot Est We 00 10ort zest corner of us Northwest Quarter or the North - east quarter of Section 2; thence running East a distance of 263963 fNt= thence South a distance of 123297 feet= tbtooe 'pest -a distance of 263963 feet= thence North a distance of 1232.7 feet to point of beginning, I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I as a duly licensed Iosnd Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ' I Sinned t h is .J�day of A.D. 1� ','yam Companies S7�1-r N EN51 EKING. INc. Not published: All rights reserved 2 7 Copyright 1967 SE C Wpsni*g • Suburban Engineering, Inc. -- ---,,, Minn . icense NO. lei_ 1Q �v►CZJF �l �N�► C,o, 0 N E. To 0 1 11� ( toe 11 1' eq it • a; �• ( t •� 1+0d •1 1 • 1 • •+ nr if, v• y `C •, of 1 • 0 `• K.01 i • r•. �L�� � 00 fdo 1. /IAr•1 •f : , Y/r •• •Q t v X• ••1 i id 11 /r•• � � ^ io � '� �'•� -"V • J r••t1.• • t � s �� � l rf.0 f i t � G� ti � 1 • •• •f, / �• 1 / Sf, • r t' • 1� 40 Oki i /� 6S •••p• .� �� •„0..,�• f M tr.s + • +� d' f C �a° • t d►. �' - t 1 tot a �; • �. r. i �6. 1980 SOP. 19 • 1 sl ft Who! t t sow •; 1. � < <! ; s '' ' •�, � ®oo.ot•• .�•�. •� � • � �/s /. •, •, � 1•jll IT OO�QT« � , f.a�T•N •K. •0'M• ` �l,• 1i• G, o »l�• it ti ` iS •°"`° ; p >t .o ...e •as. cI 1r • t so ftjrA Lo 4%IP • r 6 L [Q. •• . 't• •o, t 1t� r ♦ IL• C"11 Z �. O R• � Zip I i +1 "t "Om % . S a WHITE SEAR x• ..[. .. NY I K ocu 1141 S �,� � i , 0 0 L •," .1( • cf. [ LATE °•• — 3 S v L •fw�•000 C t. i �1y s •nt % 1980 tC�P, ?S1� • Cf. a: a • ;• a 0 _ s OWIC 1*84 Iran t .S r0, tR t t. •: • v Or >, %# , •. 0004% W" C t. ��y �► f v �$ 4 « 4 C I. ft • 120 L aea t'I.14 C t. •: 4� 4 f t. at t•0►f S /, 1f ttM•6t Cie. s v • r •r �, •L/ or tl •• t� «Ill1t0E 1 d LAREWOOG I. itKT C1tl � o • •i/fliLW lb s • S j �� COLLEGE ♦ Mono • Memo boom Cv. WON 4 s ••�[ ta'K [ . I a � f e LL 111log R. i% � [ •• .. ! S Lm 94 TtA AWL v C1. fool �"•C5s •tom ►-� � � 69t �! •[roc•o•f « � 0 Sari = L--9/14Cm-mfq& t. �..t�[•r. �.. J' - ` ... 1 015, t •O oil- go 11601" 04 0 tin Jr >� • f...t[ .a• •or. a t;• no � a•1. hr1• r S ••o.rt •N,.. S #1 %.#1 &ft •o. MAPLEWOOD fa Sul •M(•` • wa 94 • L • th �• .. , �• •• !Ow► ,AID•.. 1980 ro►. ?i.9l0 �1 a IL �J + �• ` e a.; tOt�t•s11 C'.00" � � � 1!w► • C1. .• •r(. .. 1. Std a �_ •4l faiw • � ! t !1 w Item �COwlt MaO •• C " < Zi � � s Col.tt L L •1. C 11 • 3 • 011* O%jr Awl •� ro a - ffJl i csor,at 9& son •„� • s -• •� Y � et .�s.t � ,� •.e. 3 t .•o . frt•, . t w, : s t, a 'V • s • �tMOLES NO i till af;fw �t. $I"% RTH •''� � 9 Y• i••I 40L 40L 1 1, 19 ..�, ,�. IL 31 •t. t4�•.n .f� n �• ST. PA UL 1980 or. (A61:1 "M• 11921 At soft 4%1. %FPMUA 4 L CAM F OWN lip Cora •'� C0� Il.•/ t�11• .«!. arl. S ••'� „ •fr< •tr'r St. t s a • 0 : � )PRO rJ .. � 1 a� 1t � t • 40b •� . � . • • t t •.p •n. a jell i • fry •.t,. • C ijC11V Gal .• •• w1 �. �� '' ,� f i tra •�•rf a •. ••O.1 r t a, ` v l t `, y•. ••• .••• •0'.1 00 • • so ff �+ too *is sot CIO >-.60 I Site Location EXHIBIT G The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County., N- innesota, eyrept that part thereof embraced within the plat of Maplewood Mall Addition. Subject to easements, restrictions or reservations of record, if any, and sub ject to platted rcadway and utility easements in connection with Beam Avenue and utility easements in connection with Kennard Avenue. More specifically described as: All that part of the. Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Secticn 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter; thence on an assurned bearing of North 89 degrees 11 mi outes 33 spnonfir WP St 1319.78. feet ; thence North 00 degrees 26 minutes 21 seconds West 160.00 feet along the West line of said Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing on a bearing of North 00 degrees 26 minutes 21 seconds Wnst. a 1 nno sA i ri West line 1154.23 feetto the North line of South one -half of the Northeast quarter; thence South 89 degrees 16 minutes 25 seconds East along said North line of said South one -half 859.69 feet; thence South 00 degrees 26 minutes 16 seconds East 1255.41 feet; thence North 89 degrees 11 minutes 39 seconds West 299.48 feet; thence North 00 degrees 48 minutes 21 seconds Fast 12.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 11 minutes 39 seconds West 480.46 feet$ thence North 24 degrees 24-minutes 27 seconds West 98.23 feet; thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes 39 seconds.West 40.00 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. Also all of Lot 8, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota Also all that part of Lot 7, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition Ramsey County, Minnesota lying Southwesterly and Westerly of the following described line; Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 7; thence on assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 26 minutes 16 seconds West along the Easterly line of said Lot 7 a distance of 157.58 feet; thence Northerly, Northeasterly and Easterly along the Easterly line of said lot 7 and along a tangential curve concave to,the Southeast having a Central angle of 81 degrees 29 minutes 26 seconds a radius of 173.04 feet, a chord bearing of North 40 degrees 18 minutes.27 seconds East a distance of 246.11 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 81 degrees 03 minutes 10 seconds West 30.00 feet; thence North 53 degrees 58 minutes 50 seconds West 52.54 feet; thence North 4 degrees 37 minutes 01 seconds West 418.57 feet to a point on the North of dine of said Lot 7 distant 460.09 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof and there terminating. � w i 1 11% dMI ( 1 ' • _ • h 1, .• �r i. 1 �� • ♦ ) •tir C.• .7y tit t"+ L .� _f , •� • 5` �• i 60 a• 1 t a . I( •r C•t.r l• !t rw at It •• /.IGaI NO "1 .ray • • 1 - - ' '� r �/ + • " CQart♦ K►•0 C ! 7 i I fit• --y► .. SCtu t .w 1011f1 Y I • . � I � + h v0, es st.C11 • �� � — %.; �• �•rjI �' I •tqw it, `. �t.� +•I •t•If 1, St ' , 40 same- j • $ r kMaif t •atktfvfl, r lay 1900 POP. 394 R7". rS . t •t h �t• 0� .� o.. ' at v l0 OOmOitr cr•�.�• ♦`• t ls�lf OOAO -- , r.Aaf• •v(, 1 V+ C' • •� r / » 1 t�• 61 p ct y' acct 6S •oaao i ; r �o R s " 1 o i t � y+�`lu s�K t : o� 11 •, • CO. (• , •p, t t<• CCV+It 40. •1k Or000 J diar st m a •t• L ' �5 IK• �� ': «+� ; " s1 WHITE BEAR !l P"www oaa t a �., n ! ; ��I.fS.t t►fte Cy. S•a.t LAKE — j u L •tmC,�.0O0 c t. _ t • �� 1900 POP, .22534 S � c'' o.�. si• o i .ark .vt VOL t s st, OL tR C t. y o 4 r � . % a. down � C T. ,�� �• cr, of O 110 L •.anam Cf. o 411 St. " .t tin! 4r L S L�K po L i.nl T(AQ&rt C1L r 4 0 flt all T• •0.1S10E .i E 1• ST•C1 C1L 9 Y �w •� ••c COVVuNjTY L f:•tr o•aS . t• d s o' — �� C Ot l E GE L �•t *000 a itrfr, .� • 3 T•a.s t o L� g. J r,4 ncr ct- s 01Kr . v de OIt e4+. R. , t ?. aK. Ore � ► -s s S T. I T LL 1S 11K R. c t• ~ c=•. i(A .rt. � `t � � ts. • C1. S•",at d • T1%t j 691 It eon f•a. Who t. •.•tttr• l•• J ' �R ash t. IAO �. ,g 19 t1 itec.« "� • ..�� 691 tr ari. ►+r[JI art aq. • ! l a t •� � ��! Y ta.•tc t � s , � � 120 C Kam •'�- Karts 3 . •L T q •af;� i i I.a�t •f[. ' •Ota "Ol► C♦ a.t,. Lli• P MAPLEWOOD .a � a„L, ' �•. a .►..t, � + t.r.�a +lo. j 1900 POP. 21.990 �ALwa n ' sg •� , c .`. tOltilrrM �.t1LI�r °r i!w►s C1. ate 1. 'S two* 1- r g a Se w i --c Oiw t f •o•o " C " ? 1 r°"a.` z L C 11 .t��:/ S a OIL our t .n •� ! w tip w • �, ,. atK• • t/�iJ1 •.+w S1 Imp m s 6S 1•w�. a Ip arf. .. ••tw 11 L 4L OWN a Ot rOtr i` r 1 Srw a OL it fl►•0 Os •`• 's •'�• $1"% .0 f T. IL S •►r .. a l..ocRS NORTH •A. t K� t. • Its tame .K. r • 1� . «w+ ST. 9s ST. PA UL `4) ' a "Q% 00% �a•O .1t• 9 ? t. •� 3 t {•r.,l ran. 4AialS •trL 1980 Pop. ti`` J 40• St. t 41M WKS v I& Ift4 110 : • awl• •A/rttt�tf � �� •� ,t. ` r C0►t' �'�- ` �.tn/ �� ot • . Cwt t .trC. ; .� "r awL �.lti ST. •= s . co w • a rj , w • t •1/t K r• a • w "' C� . •~' bid • A.. ' S 1. �, 2 / x C.. • I _ to wi. r' VL .. team. C ( • •t . wpm.♦ ; J �! •► • M' ::•�/ {t,i 1�7� �`' �` `� Ito •ttf+.tt ' ••f • w v S +• %♦ •�, `i 1 % im,.r01n 1 i 1 •• • V• It f Ila% 1b X0".1 •p , >aka wo � /l. • f,►r..tt. C i. � . .. J r •h � y.rttr s '/ ' � � ..•.. p.l _ v Y •1• r yt 1 • r C.4•r606 CIO r � 1 i i .• .. r � • � r � r / Mt •r �� . U . . ....,t .•1 ..1 •�... r �. .� y �• ... .� Site Location EXHIBIT G The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County., Klnnesota, eyre-ept that part thereof embraced within the plat of Maplewood Mall Addition. Subject to easements, restrictions or reservations of record, if any, and subject to platted rcadway and utility easements in connection with Beam Avenue and utility easements in connection with Kennard Avenue. More specifically described as: All that part of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the ..Southeast corner of said Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 11 m i outes 33 spnoncic, West 1319.7x. f.ee t ; thence North 00 degrees .26 minutes 21 seconds West 360.00 feet along the West line of said Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing on a bearing 4f North QQ degrees 26 minutes 21 seconds Wnst A 1 nno sA i d West line 1154.23 feet to the North line of South one -half of the Northeast quarter; thence South 89 degrees 16 minutes 25 seconds East along said North line of said South one -half 859.69 feet; thence South 00 degrees 26 minutes 16 seconds East 1255.41 feet; thence North 89 degrees 11 minutes 39 seconds west 299.48 feet; thence North 00 degrees 48 minutes 21 seconds East 12.00 feet, thence North 89 degrees 11 minutes 39 seconds -West 480.46 feet; thence North 24 degrees 24-minutes 27 seconds West 98.23 feet; thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes 39 seconds West 40.00 feet to the point of beginning and t -here terminating. Also all of Lot 8, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota .Also all that part of Lot 7, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition Ramsey County, Minnesota lying Southwesterly and Westerly of the following described line; Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 7; thence on assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 26 minutes 16 seconds west along the Easterly line of said Lot 7 a distance of 157.58 feet; thence Northerly, Northeasterly and Easterly along the Easterly line of said lot 7 and along a tangential curve concave to the Southeast having a central angle of 81 degrees 29 minutes 26 seconds a radius of 173.04 feet, a chord bearing of North 40 degrees 18 minutes 27 seconds East a distance of 246.11 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 81 degrees 03 minutes 10 seconds West 30.00 feet; thence North 53 degrees 58 minutes 50 seconds West 52.54 feet; thence North 4 degrees 37 minutes 01 seconds West 418.57 feet to a point on the North of line of said Lot 7 distant 460.09 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof and there terminating.