HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-08-28 CDRB Packet Sok
AGENDA
MAPLBWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
August 28, 1990
7:00 P.M.
Maplewood City Hall Council Chambers
1830 E. County Road B
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes: July 17, 1990 and August 14, 1990
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Unfinished Business
6. Design Review
a. Exterior Material Change - Emerald Inn, 2025 County Road D
b. Code Amendment - Appeals and Building Cost Review- Limits
• c. Resolution of Appreciation for Roger Anitzberger
7. Visitor Presentations
8. Board Presentations
9. Staff Presentations:
a. Tentative September 11 Agenda:
(1) Sign Proposal - Surburbia Furniture and Carpets,
3000 White Bear Avenue
(2) City Hall Landscape Plan Review
10. Adjournment
CDRBAGENDA
•
•
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
• 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JULY 17, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Moe called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Donald Moe Present
Tom Deans Present
Marvin Erickson Absent
Roger Anitzberger Absent
Michael Holder Absent
Daniel Molin Present
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. June 5, 1990
Boardmember Deans moved approval of the minutes of June
5, 1990, as submitted.
Boardmember Molin seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Molin
• 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was amended adding Item 6. c. Hazelwood Park
Picnic Shelter.
Boardmember Molin moved approval of the agenda as amended.
Boardmember Deans seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Molin
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business.
6. DESIGN REVIEW
a. Building Addition - St. John's Northeast Hospital, 1575
Beam Avenue
Charles Wieck, construction coordinator for HealthEast,
said he sees no problem with any of the seven
recommended conditions of approval of the staff report.
In response to a question from Boardmember Molin,
Secretary Ekstrand said there is not a problem with
setbacks, but some of the parking will be eliminated.
• Mr. Wieck said they are planning to add more parking in
the future.
. Community Design Review Board - 2 -
Minutes 7 -17 -90
Boardmember Deans said, since the company he works for
designed this project, he would normally abstain from
voting if there were another member present to
constitute a quorum for this vote. As it is, if he
abstained, the remaining two members would not
constitute a quorum for a vote. Boardmember Deans said
since this does not seem to be a controversial issue
and he did not work on this project, abstaining does
not seem warranted and he would vote on it.
Chairman Moe asked for comments from the public and
there were no comments.
Boardmember Molin moved the Planning Commission
recommend approval of plans date stamped June 20, 1990,
for a two -story building addition to St. John's
Northeast Hospital, subject to compliance with the
following conditions:
(1) The original conditions of August 23, 1983 shall
apply to this project.
(2) The applicant shall repeat this review if
construction has not begun within two years.
(3) Grading, drainage, erosion control and utility
plans shall be subject to the City Engineer's
approval.
(4) All required landscape areas shall be continually
and properly maintained. The owner must replace
all dead plantings within one year.
(5) The building exterior shall be continually and
properly maintained.
(6) All fire department access roads must be
maintained at all times during and after
construction. Parking for patient pickup at the
main lobby must not block fire lanes.
(7) The applicant shall provide an escrow, in a form
acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the
estimated cost of any site improvements that are
not completed by occupancy. The applicant shall
also provide proper documentation, to be approved
by the City Attorney, which allows staff access
onto the property to finish work that may not be
completed.
• Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes 7 -17 -90
Boardmember Deans seconded Ayes- -Moe, Deans, Molin
b. Equipment Storage Building - Woodbury Mechanical,
Clarence Street
Richard Eldridge was present representing the
applicant, Tim Eldridge. Mr. Eldridge said he had
reviewed the conditions of approval recommended by
staff and was in agreement with them.
The Board members discussed with Mr. Eldridge his plans
for landscaping.
Tom McDonough, 1889 Clarence Street, said he would like
to have a fence constructed to screen his property,
since there would be some storage outside of the
building. Mr. Eldridge responded that he did not think
a fence was necessary and he does not have any plans to
construct a fence. Chairman Moe suggested additional
landscaping could be considered rather than fencing.
Boardmember Deans said he didn't feel screening should
be required adjacent to the property zoned commercial,
• but that screening should be required for adjacent
properties zoned residential. Current zonings of area
properties were discussed.
Bob Kluge, 1881 Clarence Street, said he owns four
lots, two of which adjoin Mr. Eldridge's property. Mr.
Kluge said he is concerned with property being stored
outside of the building and, also, wants evergreen
screening between the proposed building and his
property.
Boardmember Deans moved approval of plans date stamped
July 17, 1990, for the proposed Woodbury Mechanical
storage building. The applicant /owner must meet the
following conditions:
(L) Provide screening enclosures around any outdoor
trash dumpsters as code requires. Trash
enclosures and gates must sit flush on the ground
to prevent debris from blowing out from
underneath.
(2) Screen all mechanical equipment placed outside or
on the roof. Screening is subject to Board
approval.
•
• Community Design Review Board -4-
Minutes 7 -17 -90
(3) Stripe the parking area in a double stripe,
"hairpin" design. Parking and driveway areas
shall be bituminous. Parking lots and drives must
be kept in a maintained fashion.
(4) Repeat this review if construction has not begun
within two years.
(5) Install site security lighting. This lighting
must be directed or shielded to not cause any
undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways.
(6) Replace property irons if removed by the
construction. Repair and restore any adjacent
property if damaged by the construction.
(7) Submit a grading, drainage, erosion control and
utility plan for the City Engineer's approval.
(8) Install a building address on the building and at
the driveway entrance.
• (9) Resod the boulevard if damaged by the
construction.
(10) Keep all outside materials within the fenced area.
(11) Submit a landscape plan for Board approval
providing for:
(a) Staff considerations for screening.
(b) Adjacent residents considerations for
screening.
(12) Keep all landscaping and sod areas continually
maintained. Dead plantings must be replaced
within one year.
(13) Widening the driveway to 20 feet with a turnaround
by the building, subject to the Fire Marshal's
approval.
(14) Provide an escrow, in a form acceptable to staff,
in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any
required improvements that are not completed by
occupancy. The applicant shall also provide
documentation, to be approved by the City
• Attorney, allowing staff onto the property to
finish any work that may not be completed.
• Community Design Review Board -5-
Minutes 7 -17 -90
Boardmember Molin seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Molin
c. Hazelwood Park Picnic Shelter
Boardmember Deans moved approval of the plans for the
Hazelwood Park picnic shelter.
Boardmember Molin seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Molin
7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
There were no visitor presentations.
8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS
a. Interviews for CDRB Vacancy
Boardmember Molin moved the Board recommend the City
Council appoint Marie Robinson as a member of the
Community Design Review Board.
Boardmember Deans seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Molin
• 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
Secretary Ekstrand distributed copies of the City financial
report.
10. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m.
•
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
AUGUST 14, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Moe called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Donald Moe Present
Tom Deans Present
Marvin Erickson Present
Michael Holder Present
Daniel Molin Absent
Marie Robinson Present
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. July 17, 1990
The minutes of July 17, 1990, were tabled due to lack
of quorum.
• b. July 31, 1990
The minutes were amended on page 2, item 6. a. changing
the word "needing" to "needed ".
Boardmember Holder moved approval of the minutes as
amended.
Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans,
Erickson, Holder
Abstentions- -
Robinson
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the agenda as
submitted.
Boardmember Holder seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans,
Erickson, Holder,
Robinson
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business.
• Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes 8 -14 -90
•
6. DESIGN REVIEW
a. Fina Lube - Finamart Station, 2168 White Bear Avenue
Paul Strother of Clutz, O'Brien, Strother Architects
was present at the meeting. Mr. Strother said he was
in agreement with the conditions of the staff
recommendation. Mr. Strother said no new trash
dumpsters would be added unless the existing dumpster
facilities were found to be inadequate.
Boardmember Erickson moved approval of plans date
stamped July 10, 1990, for the proposed Fina Lube
Center. The applicant /owner must meet the following
conditions:
1. Obtain approval of a conditional use permit to
service automobiles.
2. Vacate the south 15 feet of the utility easement
north of the proposed building.
• 3. Provide screening enclosures around any outdoor
trash dumpsters as code requires. Trash
enclosures and gates must sit flush on the ground
to prevent debris from blowing out from
underneath.
4. Screen all mechanical equipment placed on the roof
and ground. Screening is subject to Board
approval.
5. Stripe the parking area in a double- stripe,
"hairpin" design. Parking and driveway areas must
' be bituminous. Curbing must be continuous
concrete curb. Parking lots and drives must be
maintained.
6. Repeat this review if construction has not begun
within two years.
7. Install site - security lighting. This lighting
must be directed or shielded to not cause any
undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways.
8. Replace property irons if removed by the
• construction. Repair and restore any adjacent
property if damaged by the construction.
• Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes 8 -14 -90
9. Submit a grading, drainage, erosion control and
utility plan for the City Engineer's approval.
10. Continually maintain all landscaped areas. All
required landscaping that dies shall be replaced
within one year.
11. Submit a revised landscape plan for staff approval
providing screening along the north lot line as a
buffer for the house to the north.
12. Provide reflectorized stop signs, building
addresses and handicap parking signs.
13. Repair and sod the boulevard if damaged by the
construction.
14. Keep the building exterior continually maintained.
15. Taper the sidewalk to meet the grade of the new
driveway.
• 16. Install an in- ground lawn sprinkling system for
all landscaped areas.
17. Keep the width of the new curb cut at 30 feet
maximum.
18. Provide an escrow, in a form acceptable to staff,
in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any
required improvements not completed by occupancy.
The applicant shall also provide proper
documentation, to be approved by the city
attorney, which allows staff onto the property to
finish work that may not be completed.
Boardmember Holder seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans,
Erickson, Holder,
Robinson
b. City Hall Landscape Plan Update
Secretary Ekstrand distributed copies of a memorandum
from Gretchen Maglich, Assistant City Manager,
outlining the proposed landscaping revisions for City
Hall.
• 7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
There were no visitor presentations.
• Community Design Review Board -4-
Minutes 8 -14 -90
8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS
Boardmember Robinson reported on the August 13 City Council
meeting.
9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
There were no staff presentations.
10. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 7:36 p.m.
•
•
I
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Thomas Ekstrand Des ign Review goad D
L UBJTCT: 20 25 East County lewood partnership
O
LOCAT Emerald Inn of Ma
APNLIANT. Wronski Prof
PROJECT TITLE. Building Exterior Remodel
DRT August 21, 1990
DATEE:
INTRODUCTI
Request verti a pproval to apply cal-panel
d.sidica would
lteri is the PP The p P buddin
The app th Bmerald Inn.
cos y match on
closely
match the texture and color of the existing
Reason for the R est
e deteriorating and there
The existing precast concrete exterior is
is rainwater leakage.
BACKGROUND roved plans for the Emerald Inn on
The Design , i eV 1 Board app
41 September
RECOMMENDATION for the prop ° Th
ext e
p, proval of plans date stamped August 14, 1990, ld Inn, 2025 East Count Road D. p arbor siding on the keep the building exterior continually
applicant or owner sha
maintained.
TEIN'N (Section 35)
Attachments
17 oca ion Line /Zoning Map
2. Property
3. Site Plan ed August 14, 1990
4. Plans date -stamp
•
Httachment 1 J[ N
A . •
- - -- • , , _ L.ce - i . � — - - - .- _ — — - - 1'818.11_.
1 • - ', el
•
!
L2ac �.� rpO' / b \
° p
0 - v o. / p V r/ w .
tc■ • 2. ! 9 2 S
• •
1 I; r •
to ' O } (4) ) „ - - ........
1 so ' ' - -- .. / ' : : \ / 0 4 _ a l
�. - r ■
til ,a
1sb t -.'' 2r4Lo.18 ���� iu..,
2 Oa1 9I • - 28.27 ; — — —
! W. G. L. 11-14-41 .i: - - -. -- __
0. 1 •694
0
^3,1 •► 9 • ,i. • r•er a r
• . p .
. 3 ax..... .� c
B 1 p PALco �.,� r . , . t ;;`' ]!1 INN n
v« Eo E+ .a ; { . M.e /[ r rrOe� e V ., ' . �. \•. .. ; Yv A .vrEXEO 6
„ 61 . 4111 2 I a ° '52
'�. PERKINS ::,t `;' so ro r., r.,.i,. weo0
le ' 309, 4� ,
rtp — - - COUNTY ROAD D - 111-111- N III III H
L
J
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
it°'
...._____,
• N
• 3 Attachment 2
.
1 I
IS . ■
Oil
1
icy ° 1 y 1
r 1A �• : 44 h:
SGT
.*::§:*:.
v . , . ? S:' ' �� `: .y . -
�•
SI . .. .Zoo, �4 =0 �� • ' :: ,•, •: ''. s ,,. y _'d z{=o' '30'•`0 l r-r d •
' r
. I.
' - ..4 1 I
el
• r 41f •• N
i
1 M �� t 1 •
.2 0 ----- .— -4.L•
• 1
�
frceH N
LIG-T Q
IQ
?d-` ' Q"'". 270 zt 24 r
t
to r‘ JAY E M Ert
Ewa, Or
-_- aOpEP FA�E l derlr j ' 1 • :
x ado I ,exiStf.16 A4 R i'" I 26;o -
SITE PLAN
4 Attachment 3 I N
I •
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Code Amendment - Approval of Plans
DATE: August 23, 1990
INTRODUCTION
Staff is proposing three changes:
1. Increase the dollar limits for Staff approval of minor
building plans.
2. Amend the code to allow the Council to change dollar limits by
resolution.
3. Extend the deadline for filing an appeal of a Community Design
Review Board motion.
BACKGROUND
Dollar Limits
Section 25 -65 (c) of the City Code requires that the City Council
• periodically review the dollar limits which determine the projects
that the Board must approve. The present limits allow Staff
approval of new buildings under $12,000. Staff may also approve
additions under $120,000, where the Board has previously approved
the original building. The purpose of the ordinance is to speed
the review process by allowing Staff approval of smaller projects.
On February 18, 1982, the City Council increased the valuation
limits from $10,000 and $100,000 to $12,000 and $120,000.
Appeals Deadline
Code requires that appeals be filed within 10 days of the Board's
motion. The Council would like enough time to get the minutes and
make an appeal, if they choose.
DISCUSSION
Council should increase the construction cost limits to $15,000
and $150,000 to stay even with construction cost increases since
1982. The proposed code amendment would allow future revisions by
resolution. This would be easier and faster than making these
periodic changes by ordinance.
Council should revise the ordinance to extend the Review Board
appeal deadline to 15 days. The secretary sends the minutes to
the Council 7 -8 days after the Board's meeting. (The Mayor does
not get the minutes.) Fifteen days would allow the City Council
• more time to appeal a Review Board motion if they choose. The
only problem with this appeal - period increase is that it could
•
delay the issuance of a building permit five extra days.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approval of the code amendment on page 3 which:
(a) Allows the Council to establish dollar limits by
resolution.
(b) Extends the deadline for appealing a Community Design
Review Board motion from 10 to 15 days.
2. Adoption of the resolution on page 5. This resolution
increases the dollar limits for Staff review of minor
construction projects to $15,000 and to $150,000 for additions
where the Community Design Review Board reviewed the original
building.
TECOSTS
Attachments
1. Code Amendment
• 2. Resolution
2
•
s
e • ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains:
Section 1. Section 25 -65 is amended as follows (additions are
underlined; deletions are crossed out):
Section 25 -65. Approval of plans. Preliminary Rcvicw3 by
reviewed -b eard, et=
(a) The Director of Community Development shall review all
plans for minor building or remodeling proiects. plans
of twelve thousand 4ellars ($12,600.00) or 1C33 in
value and all additions of eac hundred twenty thousand
dollars ($120,600.06) or leas, where the addition is
consistent with thc dcslge e€ the original building and
where thc original building was prcviou3ly rcvicwcd by
tho Community Dc3ign Review Board. The City Council
shall define minor building proiects by dollar
valuations set by resolution from time to time. Before
approving the plans. the Director must first determine, -
hewevcr, that the plans meet all City ordinances and
• policies. and that the proposal would not have an
adverse impact en surrounding propertic3. Anyone may
If thc applicant chooses to appeal this the decision e€
thc Director, the case 3h311 be sent to the Community
Design Review Board. -a deeise "ea's F_.._ The
Board's decision shall be final. unless someone appeals
it to may bc made to the City Council by any cffcctcd
pereen within tcn (10) fifteen (15) days after the
Board's decision.
(b) All other plans shall bc rcvicwcd by the The Community
Design Review Board shall review all other plans. The
Board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals
it appealed to the City Council by thc applicant, city
Staff, or any effected per3on, within ten (10) fifteen
(15) days after the Board's decision.
rcvicwcd by the City Council.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
passage and publication.
•
• Passed by the Maplewood City Council on
1990.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes--
Nays--
1
•
1
• RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Section 25 -65 (a) of the Code of Ordinances
requires that the City Council define minor building projects by
dollar limits;
WHEREAS, construction costs have increased enough to warrant
that the City Council increase the previous dollar limits of
$12,000 and $120,000;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a minor building project
is any building project under $15,000 in value, except additions
to buildings that the Community Design Review Board approved
before. In this case, a minor construction project must be less
than $150,000 in value.
Adopted this day of , 1990.
Seconded by Ayes- -
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Joint Resolution of Appreciation
DATE: August 23, 1990
The City Council and Community Design Review Board should approve
a resolution of appreciation for Roger Anitzberger. He recently
resigned from the Board. His position has been filled.
Recommendation
Adopt the attached resolution.
kd /jntres.mem
Attachment: Resolution
•
•
•
10IN7 RESOLl17ION OF APPRECIA7ION
WHEREAS, Rogea An i tdei gez Became a menden. o, the Community De sign
Review Boaad o/ Maplewood on June 13, 1988 and has waved /aifh /uUj
in that capacity;
WHEREAS, he his ,? e.ely given o, hL time and ene'gy, without
compensation, A4 the LetteamenL o, the City o, Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, he has shown thtcence dedication to h.LS dulie4 and has
conziztent/Y conta Jited h.ia lead a4hip and e£loat in many ways /on.
the Lenz/it o, the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, 17 IS HEREBY RESOLVED ,boa and on Behalf of .the
City o/ !Maplewood, Mi viezota, and the citizenvs o, the City, that
Rogea An i tz..eagea .us he.n 1y extended out heaAt/eit gn.atitude and
appreciation /on h•Ls dedicated henv.ice, and we wish him continued
aucce6e in the flute e.
Passed By the Council o/ the
•
City o/ !Maplewood thi6
day o7 , 1990.
gam Bast i..an, lMayoa
Pawed By the Community
Design Review Boand o1
the City o Maplewood
th.i,.s day of , 1990.
Donald !Moe, Chaivnan
Attest:
Lucille E. ,4w e i uz, r/erk
•
111