Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-09-18 CDRB Packet 4, 4Ir AGENDA MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD September 18, 1990 7:00 P.M. Maplewood City Hall Council Chambers 1830 E. County Road B 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: August 28, 1990 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Unfinished Business a. City Hall Landscape Plan b. Code Amendment - Appeals and Building Cost Review Limits 6. Design Review a. Building Addition - 3M Company Building 251 b. Site Plan Revision - Rolling Hills Second Addition, Century Avenue North c. Sign Request - Capital City Adventist School, 1220 South McKnight Road d. Building Remodel - Embers Restaurant, 1200 East Highway 36 e. Plan Revision - Richard Schreier Twin Hale, Gall Avenue 7. Visitor Presentations 8. Board Presentations 9. Staff Presentations a. Tentative October 9 agenda: (1) Code Amendment - Conversion of Design Policies to Ordinance (2) Variance Request - Roof Mounted Equipment Screening at Birch Run Station 10. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AUGUST 28, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Moe called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Donald Moe Present Tom Deans Present Marvin Erickson Present Michael Holder Present Daniel Molin Present Marie Robinson Present 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. August 14, 1990 Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the minutes of August 14, 1990, as submitted. Boardmember Robinson seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson, Holder, Robinson • Abstentions - Molin b. July 17, 1990 The minutes of July 17, 1990, were amended on page 2, paragraph 3 changing "Planning Commission" to "Review Board ". Boardmember Deans moved approval of the minutes of July 17, 1990, as amended. Boardmember Molin seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Molin Abstentions -- Holder, Erickson, Robinson 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Boardmember Holder moved approval of the agenda as submitted. Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes--Moe, ckson, Holder, Molin, • Robinson • Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes 8 -28 -90 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business. 6. DESIGN REVIEW a. Exterior Material Change - Emerald Inn, 2025 County Road D Fred Chute, former owner and developer of the Emerald Inn, said his architect recommended the proposed steel siding to correct deterioration and rainwater leakage problems. Mr. Chute said the proposed siding is similar in texture and color to the precast concrete exterior on the building. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of plans date stamped August 14, 1990, for the proposed exterior siding on the Emerald Inn, 2025 East County Road D. The applicant or owner shall keep the building exterior continually maintained. • Boardmember Holder seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson, Holder, Molin, Robinson b. Code Amendment - Appeals and Building Cost Review - Limits Secretary Ekstrand presented the staff report for the proposed code amendment regarding appeals and building cost review - limits and discussed it with Board members. The Board agreed with the dollar limit and the appeal period increases, but did not want the code changed to allow future dollar limit changes by resolution. The Board felt that: 1. It would be too easy to circumvent the process for thorough reviews of the dollar limits if only a resolution is needed for future revisions. 2. The dollar limits could be changed for reasons other than inflation. Boardmember Deans moved to table this item to allow staff to make Board requested revisions. • . Community Design Review Board -3 Minutes 8 -28 -90 Boardmember Molin seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson, Molin, Holder, Robinson c. Resolution of Appreciation for Roger Anitzberger Boardmember Erickson moved adoption of the resolution of appreciation for former Review Board member Roger Anitzberger. Boardmember Holder seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson, Molin, Holder, Robinson 7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS There were no visitor presentations. 8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS Boardmember Robinson reported on the August 27 City Council meeting. • 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS There were no staff presentations. 10. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8 p.m. • MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: City Hall Landscaping LOCATION: 1830 East County Road B DATE: September 4, 1990 INTRODUCTION City Staff is requesting approval of landscaping for the City Hall parking lot. Refer to the memo on page 2 from Gretchen Maglich, Assistant City Manager. BACKGROUND On July 31, 1990, the Community Design Review Board voted to have a revised landscape plan for City Hall submitted for their review. The Board wanted to see a plan for relandscaping the parking lot area. They also felt that the new trees planted by the northwest corner of the new addition were too close together. DISCUSSION The proposed plan addresses the Board's concerns. Work will begin • once the Board has approved the plan. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the City Hall parking lot landscape plan dated August 23, 1990. TECITYHA (Section 14) Attachments 1. Memo from Gretchen Maglich dated August 29, 1990 2. Landscape Plan reduction 3. Landscape Plan dated August 23, 1990 (separate attachment) • • CITY HALL PARKING LOT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN On Monday, August 27, 1990, the City Council approved the expenditure of funds for the landscaping of the parking lot and the removal and replacement of the large oak tree in front of City Hall. The Council chose a plan submitted by Bachman's. The following is a brief summary of the plans. * Remove the large oak in front of City Hall. * Replace the oak with a 4" sugar maple. * Remove the existing turf on the two center medians and plant an assortment of weigela, spirea, junipers. * Construct a boulder retaining wall around the oak in the middle median. * Transplant four of the small pine trees currently in the medians to other medians. * Distribute eight (8) flowering crabapples and eight (8) • maples on all four medians. * Cover the two center medians with red rock over weed barriers. Bachman's could begin this project soon after CDRB approval. It is the intent to complete the planting before the end of September. NEW PINES ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CITY HALL At the direction of the City Council, the City Engineer spoke to the landscapers who planted the new trees around the addition. It is recommended not to transplant the pines at this time, because it is felt that moving them so soon after planting would damage them. They are to be moved next spring. AU6 2 91990 • From Gretchen Maglich 2 Attachment 1 IL. ---- ----- — . . , • N ... _--••■----"-- FLOWERING ' ROCK MULCH ISLAND ' ROCS NUL= ISLAND • ,CRASAPPLE I N -7.- .. , ... e , , 0 0 i . Om 0 . .. . .0. : . . , ,.... th TREES • _ ... _ GRASS _. voPliri, _ . _.. .__. • \ , 6.4.41 - KA PLE TREE . . . .. .. — . . . -- _ - -- — • - _— _ --.-- — _ — -_ _ , ____ .Ifil __V — . . ________ 04 _ ......1 ••'- . - . ... _ .-- -- 0 - • --- 10 _ 4 04 ... \ I 1 . • (.1•••. _.. ... ._ i •—•— _A - We. - II Miii i - • r • _ ' -1-/Ze3'.........- ....._._..... ---- . VIP lo 31 ... ire .1 -WAVY.. .._ ; -..-- .........— ... •••■ Ilp - ...._ • 4 , .. ...-- 1 - - ---- • -.. -- . ---- - 4 . -- . • 1+ 1 . 'N\ _. _ ----• .- - • . 1 • ____ .- --. _____ mg I 2 r.... c. ....../ - r -,.. • .. _ i 4 ■•■■■■ • .. dr11117.) 4,. I i i ik o: :•.: — --.... - - -•-• - - - — - - - •.:......, Ge 0 k - . ----.... I ( 30 I i ■... r - _ -- - _ --- -- . - - -- - - , • ------• ' - , ' ______-. ■ ( I .. . / . lt - ' . i . • • - / .... 0 . 7 . . ... • • e• — - • 4 , • • • 1 . - . • r .1:, , 1••'' • . • , ..... 0 CITY HALL PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE PLAN 3 Attachment 2 N.,, A • • MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Code Amendment - Approval of Plans DATE: September 4, 1990 INTRODUCTION Staff is proposing three changes: 1. Increase the dollar limits for Staff approval of minor building plans. 2. Amend the code to allow the Council to change dollar limits by resolution. 3. Extend the deadline for filing an appeal of a Community Design Review Board motion. BACKGROUND August 28, 1990 Review Board Action The Board tabled this review. They agreed with the dollar limit and the appeal period increases, but did not want the code changed to allow future dollar limit changes by resolution. The Board • felt that: 1. It would be too easy to circumvent the process for thorough reviews of the dollar limits if only a resolution is needed for future revisions. 2. The dollar limits could be changed for reasons other than inflation. Dollar Limits Section 25 -65 (c) of the City Code requires that the City Council periodically review the dollar limits that determine the projects that the Board must approve. The present limits allow Staff approval of new buildings under $12,000. Staff may also approve additions under $120,000, where the Board had approved the original building. The purpose of the ordinance is to speed the review process by allowing Staff approval of smaller projects. On February 18, 1982, the City Council increased the valuation limits from $10,000 and $100,000 to $12,000 and $120,000. Appeals Deadline Code requires that appeals be filed within 10 days of the Board's motion. The Council would like enough time to get the minutes and make an appeal, if they choose. • • ALTERNATIVES 1. Revise the dollar limits by code amendment. See page 3. 2. Revise the dollar limits by resolution. See pages 5 -7. DISCUSSION Dollar Limits Council should increase the construction cost limits to $15,000 and $150,000 to stay even with construction cost increases since 1982. The proposed code amendment would allow future revisions by resolution. This would be easier and faster than making these periodic changes by ordinance. The Review Board would continue to review any revisions to the construction cost guidelines before Council review. Appeal Period Council should revise the ordinance to extend the Review Board appeal deadline to 15 days. The secretary sends the minutes to the Council 7 -8 days after the Board's meeting. (The Mayor does not get the minutes.) Fifteen days would allow the City Council more time to appeal a Review Board motion if they choose. The only problem with this appeal period increase is that it could delay the issuance of a building permit five extra days. • RECOMMENDATION 1. Approval of the code amendment on page 5 which: (a) Allows the Council to establish dollar limits by resolution. (b) Extends the deadline for appealing a Community Design Review Board motion from 10 to 15 days. 2. Adoption of the resolution on page 7. This resolution increases the dollar limits for Staff review of minor construction pro to $15,000 and to $150,000 for additions where the Community Design Review Board reviewed the original building. TECOSTS Attachments 1. Code Amendment (Alternative 1) 2. Code Amendment (Alternative 2) 3. Resolution • 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 25 -65 is amended as follows (additions are underlined; deletions are crossed out): Section 25 -65. Approval of plans. Preliminary rcvicw3 by (a) The Director of Community Development shall review all plans for minor building or remodeling projects. plans of twelve thouaaid dollar3 ($12,900.00) or leas in value and all additions e€ one fired twenty thousand dollars ($120,090.00) or less, where thc addition io consistent with thc dcaign of thc original building and where thc original building was-previously reviewed by the Community Dcs -ign Review Board. Minor building projects are defined as new construction of $15,000 or less and additions of $150,000 or less,, where the Board approved the original building. Before approving the Plans, the Director must fir3t determine, however that the plans meet all City ordinances and policies. and that the prope3al would not have an adverse impact on currounding propertic3. Anyone may If thc applicant ,.ewes to appeal this thc decision of thc Director, thc ca3c Shall bc 3cnt to the Community Design Review Board. for a decision. Appca13 from The Board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals it to may bc made to the City Council by any cffcctcd per3of within tcn (10) fifteen (15) days after the Board's decision. (b) All other plans aha}1 be reviewed by thc The Community Design Review Board shall review all other plans. The Board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals it appealed to the City Council by thc applicant, City ctaff, or any effected person, within tcn (10) fifteen (15) days after the Board's decision. (c) The dollar limits in this section shall be periodically reviewed by the City Council. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. • 3 Attachment 1 Passed by the Maplewood City Council on 1990. • Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- 4 4 ORDINANCE NO. • AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 25 -65 is amended as follows (additions are underlined; deletions are crossed out): Section 25-65. Approval of plans. Preliminary IteviCW3 by reviewed by board, ctc. (a) The Director of Community Development shall review all plans for minor building or remodeling proiects. plane value and all additiefls ef ene hundred twenty thou3and e€thc original building and COn313tCnt with tai the desk _ = The City Council shall define minor buildina proiects by dollar . valuations set by resolution from time to time. Before approving the plans. the Director must fir :1* determine; hewers that the plans meet all City ordinances and • policies and that thc proposal would not have an • Anyone may If the applicant choo3c3 to appeal this the decision e€ _ -- -- to the Community Design Review Board. for a decision. Appcala from The Board's decision shall be final. unless someone appeals it to may be made to the City Council by any effected per3ef within tcn (10) fifteen (151 days after the Board's decision. (b) All other plans shall be rcvicwcd by the The Community Design Review Board shall review all other plans. The Board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals it appealed to the City Council by the applicant, city otaff, or any effected person, within tcn (10) fifteen (151 days after the Board's decision. reviewed by the City Council. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. 5 Attachment 2 Passed by the Maplewood City Council on • 1990. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes- - Nays- - 6 • RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Section 25 -65 (a) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council define minor building projects by dollar limits; WHEREAS, construction costs have increased enough to warrant that the City Council increase the previous dollar limits of $12,000 and $120,000; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a minor building project is any building project under $15,000 in value, except additions to buildings that the Community Design Review Board approved before. In this case, a minor construction project must be less than $150,000 in value. Adopted this day of , 1990. Seconded by Ayes -- • 7 Attachment 3 , • MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Design Review LOCATION: 3M Center, Carlton Avenue APPLICANT: 3M Company PROJECT TITLE: Building 2 51 1990 dion DATE: INTRODUCTION 3M Company proposes to build a three - story, 110,500 square -foot addition to Building 251 and a 197 -stall parking lot. The design, materials and colors will match the existing building. RECOMMENDATION Approval ldinla251dat3MsCompanyAmusttmeet the0followinq addition to 3M Building conditions: 1. Provide screening enclosures around outdoor trash dumpsters. Trash out from underneath. ground to Pr underneath. 2. Screen a i llmmecchhanicalt uipmentpplaced.on the roof and ground. • Screening jct 3. stripe the parking area in a double - stripe, "hairpin" design. Parking and driveway areas must be bituminous. Curbing must be continuous concrete curb. All employee - parking stalls must be at least 9- feet -wide. All visitor - parking stalls must be at least 9.5- feet -wide. 4. submit a grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plan for the City Engineer's approval. 5. Provide reflectorized stop signs, building addresses and handicap parking signs. 6. Install a lawn sprinkling system for all new landscape areas. 7. Provide an escrow, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any required ant shall improvements not completed by occupancy. The applic also provide a right -of -entry agreement, to be approved by the city Attorney, which allows Staff onto the property to finish work that may not be completed. 111 1 • Appeals The applicant may appeal the Board's decision within ten days of their motion. The City Council reviews all appeals. TE3M (Section 36) Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Plans date - stamped August 28, 1990 (separate attachment) • • 2 ■ • �+ " ■ - _I 1 f j HAW p NE AY 2 MARYLAND I AV / ® E. RO E q o ST 1- cn ©F z GERPS J� Q GERAN�� 1/ eecver "I o MAGNOL AV A 4 % , p0 0 Geranium H z pk P �t P take W > w �,�� W N I CASE AV J AR ESTER z 4 AA a P J ce _ M tE-P e 1 > ° Ge - ® 1 W P ® l W BRAND *too. o. LA AV Q Maplewood F m Nature � Q SEVENTH ST Eco Center E. VENTH ST x 3P z 0 P i c A V - r y et. 7 0 BUSH AV s _ a MINNEHAHA 2 m AV © 34. 34 .. F MARGARET • Lions n i Pk co 1 /• ^� E. FIFTH ST � F VJ 65 • , 1 i0 I o J ` 1r ) L - , N L_L z FREM-w • Mt j j j t � �IJQ u' LL 1 1 4 25 a ji CONVOY j, VRVICE DR • r -] I 1c2/O c_J i -, I_ i 1(; rvvi r f:-..-,1 36 * '- •--1 t I t [- S' I; 1 11 L. 235 ` %> '' t 1 II c . - -, � L X1 240 _ J' 1 I I I 16--1 \ . I/ I I cc 3 -- i r 7.=11-'T l F 2 J � I2 ri 1 - Q, 230 I�1� _�� L j/ � .I - I I /(Tanners .-► - 2 j I II Lake T. 28N,R.22W. ° i ritirilW 94 F 35 F co 2 I "YKV/ F ti... V r R �f MAYER L CO JAMES DR h 2 J ,- W fK J N J � K Po Afton ` r _, J ° z ¢ 1e C Heights cc a 0 z ¢ go Pk z y r -° 2 � o a f Tin I �1 UPPER AFTON RD n 0 LOCATION MAP III N 3 Attachment 1 lil lb • • h • 1. 1' / STILLWATER R0. I; _JV C T. H. S i1M INNEM __ - - A HA � ( LAVE -- J I__._ - -- • H Al L. H at 00 i • J . C �- u \.\\ , , .,... .. I` i, ,, ,- i 265 , , \,� I ; ,.. .... 1 s —.x E ' I I CC = ' u r__ -_--Jo -1 o i - ._ -_ i i __. -__ i I v l - -- \ I r - i' rl Ei+J I i =� 6 -� I . ~ 1I ; i t i 1j j .II��,�. .1- , ,-- - -a4 , • IT - N 1. 0 \ . .- �{ �- \.- i '4 _ -_f. 11 ... � . 1 I -e � �`,.'i i t V , R -�- ,� ( ,,_ l �.. ': ` lei- l � f NW — M 641----. l x ? / f -- k IW� --- wl it —wi I r - --- ' - 1 - __ - -` \- .\- " -- - ��' - ' 4 - (\ �� j� l . 00 I 1 a t ux 1 _� r!-1N NN• --•-IN IF—ii j4-:::- \ ! .. i xxs -1 —i ill ! _._ ' ....T , k' -- -1 --- I----- -1 -4 ' J ,/, u Wiif iI e ) i - -1 1 - --I I LI r J �J� / / i t. - 1 F � I - t - i 4 1 - -- I tJ / . �� f Th 1 I t "Vc -- ----------.........___ II I _ __ _ r �, "1 VISITOR = - - =_ — _ -- 1,t` �_ PARKING 3M CENTER _ — =_ _ , — ST. PAUL,, MINN. '''.."-----, SITE PLAN 01 • • N . 4 Attachment 2 • MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Site Plan Revision LOCATION: Century Avenue North APPLICANT /OWNER: Richard Pearson PROJECT TITLE: Rolling Hills Second Addition DATE: September 13, 1990 INTRODUCTION Richard Pearson is requesting approval to add two more mobile home lots to Rolling Hills Second Addition. There are now 110 lots. Mr. Pearson proposes to install double -wide homes. BACKGROUND On May 11, 1987, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for this development. Condition 15 of the permit requires that the Community Design Review Board review any significant site plan revisions. DISCUSSION (density requirements) The proposed lots meet the current housing density regulations. On August 27, 1990, the City Council revised the maximum allowed • densities for housing. The new criteria would not allow the two new lots. The current density regulations allow 158 lots. The new regulations allow only 95. The new density criteria, however, will not come into effect until after the Metropolitan Council has reviewed it. They have up to 90 days to review this change. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the site plan revision for Rolling Hills Second Addition for two new mobile home lots. The owner must meet the following conditions: 1. Extend the paving to at least the driveway of Lot 1. 2. Comply with all previous conditions of the Community Design Review Board and City Council. TEROLLHLS (Section 24 -29) Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan • l :3:2 R21 R F F J R ~ R 5. F L i i R3 r -- 1 F F ., (PUD) I.I i R r LBC F I R3 R3 t 4 PUB Svc , l f � (R2) l � • F • R 3 Ht , • F I c...p AvE1 ., TR R a R F j MI 2) 'I I tPJO) ROLLING HILLS M1 .....6001 ; bli . i 7 SECOND ADDITION R r —• R3 / R3 :� M� F , . ......... R � • 1 IF r \ N �p)1R3' R2 R3 ! PJ::) I R ,.r R MAIM AY') _ — R a R ? I W' P. e c P F • LBC BC I � . 1 .•:• ' / A AO u r .1 p N). r � 1 1 R : w` f � • I BCfv) p( in a I R •t ��t. *°• V A.E E AA '� S O R Bpi' f' }� �.,� a O FPAVC A• i• R R J l'. I F r o R L _. � ) ' ' k W L s [R3 R ,_ F F I a � !t 5C ?• y[!L1'! -- 1 1 \ \\ R \ F F • • ; / Ie LOCATION MAP • N 2 Attachment 1 il.. •e . . :. • . • . • ; • (1) 0.. . • 0 • • ca,41,001,00 _, _ „... • .. . „..4 ...,.. . . __.=, „....., Mi i 1 •., 4 . ‘. C... • ................. _■,.......... .......■...... _ -1111.111111111 ....+1•11111111110111111111111 i ' . . — -.: • . ■•••••.- II. WM! . •.1111111111.1. . ■ .,, W . IIIMMIK .. :I ------------- 0 i■Ill A. fr V" ............ N , SI I I 1. Wrire All•■•••• A t - t ...' 111 • • 19 ......=0•01.•1•••••■••••,-...- A ,.. 4 4,... • • 0 0 • • f \ lil :1011111111.11.1.1 . . .. ., \ li tt'.. \ 414 6 41170 ___=_... 11FX — -._ ' 1 ROLLING RILLS SECOND ADDITION AMMOMMM . . ' • „:::*:„......: 7 tr .: ....Ar4r...411:7;17...„ .'..":„F.:7.fh.jiirkr.,....s........!..t.'1{.::(•,:,....;.4%.*...:Lts,j,::i. s. ,. . - • • . .. . . . . tW.:3-.,.4..<'''''''''.:44.:41:".3';4w..-..:”.::*:•:< ,),..:*:...•.. . , ,:, . .,.. , ..„..,,,,,U... ., „ . ekx4 .... , .... ,,, , „v.% % . . . . . . • • • .. (I ) • . - • . ;..)...,^4.,04°.0."..:.-4i.,;..;::;:....,..,...:...:::::::::::::::::;.;.:::-...;:::;>.....:.. ........,.........„,,,.. ..„,„..„,,,,. . :,. - ..."4V,..t.... .4.. . :4 vi.‘ :44 .4..... ' . :44'....P.•': -1:1 '44.0.4.... %, "..e. 0 . • :.<::::.......V .:4444:7"::;:::,:..,:....Fs.:,...,...; ,. „:„...:„...„:„..„.. ,,,,,..., .. ...... ! •r3 .i...::? ....::: „.....,...... ..„: „. .......z. ..‘,. •-.,.. -- ...."-..‹-%-.f•-•'-::•:• ....A.:•::,•:?.:..-::).-:-.::::::....::.:::.....-.... -. •44,.r.-•::•.• t • • ...:::-. • . • -:e .--.*:,*.-,.••::•....,::-:..,..,:--..:.,-,:f.z...:,:,....::.:..:.:-.:,..,....:3-:..„....,,.„....,..,,...... .... s. .......,„„ .....- .,....,,M, :-.:„..-.. ., . --....:4, ....;:,-.....,.....-.. • • ..... ...... .....,..... .. ,-...., .; -,.. , ,, „.„, , ..,.., . . ,..-a.›....f.N::;„.:.....::::.........•. ...........„,„„:„,...„....„ „. :. „.,.......„_ ..,.....,.:„.:...„..,„.„„ . • ...: -..• -.-% .-v...........-:::,,...::::,-,...n,A......:ow-,:::.:........:0.:;;;::::,::3-:ft,::::.w.,....so.,.% ,,, .,„ :::,::-.•:;, :• ....,.......,-,-:.--. -.:•.•••• •••::.....,........::-:..............„,,,.....,.....,....:-.., ......,... ........=,„,...„,„„ ...... I • • -.,...,:,:......-4,:•:::::., viw ROLLING HILLS MOBILE HOME PARR . • :.::‘,.,.1. ,?,.!,::. •-,:.,.: -;.„:•.e.:::::.. .... .; ... : ...tfx., :::::44 1,, .*•z; . : , , -, ",..,..,..:..: : ...-......-„ ; ,,..:.- , ..:c...:ie,, , 4:, -•:"..,.*:, P -:' %••.:1••••.,..:••;:„ :•:::?• ....::::::::::::::::::::•::::a..,:::::::::::::::„....„:„„:„.,..,,,,•.•::::•.:„..„,,,,e7,,,,,.v.„..,,,:....::„...,....„,cp,... , 0 4," ,,,,,.:•,.. • .•,•••••••••,:i....:•••:,...,-.. -..:::::::.„ ••.• ..,• ,::::.,„.„:„..,,,,,- . ,......?, , V4 ,.. ....,..v.: - u D. • Awy.,:::::k..s...?....?0,:-...,:::::-.4:::::::•e::::::$.:• . :)...,,,,•,. ,:„:::,,..••••. •,,, ...,.„.s.,.. . --41--- --. -.... t e: , ..,.:::::4„:„:„.„,,,,,•:•:.:•••:••.•:::..,:„..........,..,...,„ -.......„.„...,....„..4.„,..,„:::„.„:,:.:::::„.....„.....:..„:„. ..:•-•:%„....%...emi„.„0„.::::.,,,,:„....:„.„:„.,: ,....„,.. ..„:„.„.„........,:„.„,...„,„......„:„., „....:,..„....„:„•„:„..:•:•...:::::•„:„.••:„..„......,„ .„,..,.. „:„.,::::.,........ ..„.5„.:...: ....„,t,...,...w..„......„.... „:„...„.....,..„:„...„,.... ..,..,,,,..„:„..,.............•••••• ..,......,..„...„....„..:..: ......„:„....„..:........."..,..„:„......„,..„.................„......„.....„..„...:„,„„.„:„....„... . - - • •--••••-•••••,•-••••-••„:„. ....„:„.„...,...,„.:•••••••„:„....•:-..,.....„..„...,.......:.„.„:„..:„.„:„...„:„:„...„...„......„,.,:. . ••••••-..-......„..:•.:,..•:_••••.:.•„.••:„.„....:„.•••••••..../..„:„.„.„,...„:„<„.„...•:...,...,.......•.. ........„...„..,...........,........„..:„ :..„,.,..,,, . 4 .... ,...„..„•:„.................„:,..„.•,..„„:„...,...„.„,,,.„......„.:„.....,..„ .... „.„.........• • ..••••,. : N't,A....,, xt - , . .::::;;;■:::': '5...x”..,.{.:350.>A. ,•,;',.w, :," WAQ.A , ,y,k. , , '%':, , 4. 4:,N9 I '%:."':::" %;;;VF - AWYP' 1 . :,:tU., .: ,P*, *:;,AV. YO: , '.." -;', ..:::NI c...i...:::::-........: •'... : 4 4 : : : : :**k.:: . ' m "*.t. ..... kx ' 4 v::::-.10„,a4,:;:c4 • •:. "..- ',:•:::•m:•••: • ": ••,. : . , ..:4•:%•%. k • .{.... •: % • • ••• • ••••••••• • •••••••••••:•,:, ..•••, ... ..4,.,1,....4 •.•,•,,, ••••:■,:;••:1:•::, ,...,:„. .:ks.,....... :. F . .:::::::...::::.:::„...... . .:... ........ -... - ..........................:....., „...,.......„....._..„........„.......:.:::.:„.„. „:..... .,. 'v.' 4 ' : •••:.:1, ... ''''..;,,...W.a:>,, ' 'C'::::',4‹.45:::•:F:aft.P.P;;;;V:::::S.:::A••.:•• • :• X.k,',•,, . '''. - ' : 4 ' `}'Wd},7 , Y:•:`: ' ''' ' ' , .,t1 : 2 • •:::*"::',.,A".....:4:,' ::::::::::::,;,,,x •$:.:. .., ••.: . „.„, `.:>. '''''':N4.%'44.:AN:71X'Z''''v '''''::?0',.::,:',.:*::7C74:4 •••••:::::::',:" ' • :.:,•:':.:',:•::. ,::: , .....:.V.. , ::::•;.:*" . .. •• „*„..;:,:„;,,,,&.„,z,,,,k,,:,..,,,,.....,:....,. 4 . ' '''''''5$'":1"""":"...:x:>"<'>->•".›.;::*::M.:?)„:':•>,.;.::: ',:::'-',:. ....*::.:. • :: .:::, ....,,,,,,.:. .;,.. -... .-: .:.:;?:.... . ....,,.:„. .. . ':' X'>f'''''''''';:';:'•'F;:+*:•'.:•:':':'::::'..::*PW:M:'5 •:;;•"::::::::::::*46',4.::*:::4:. $ ..4 ; ,..•.}.„4,:•,: . . + .,:::111'.?..f::::11:+Ef.,*:::•:::Vf3:-.:::::::4:.:.•:,:•:.',5,..,.,;.:,...:::,:::.:0::.:.•„.„ .„.... j. ...,,..§....c.:;x5s*....;.:......%,:.?i.„....7„. : „....4% ., ,.., : , ,,...01.*;..,,„ A .4 ..?..T.:..4,4A:?...!.!:4-1:.:::e..?::::::::r.,:f:•;`,:?.....'...::.*::/-:.-::i.:::::'.....fi' ....'..',:i......-::::::::::"....:-.:::-.1-..-.;10.„..*--,,,.•:".;;;;‘.'4"--*„.::::;4•7......X.:$:.:1..gli .*:.v.,..:-:-...: . • .. ........,....,. - .,.. • ...........-:,...... .- - . . „ ......,,....„..,.... ::::::.,::,..•-•.,*::::-.;::::.....::.::-:::::........ -.:::.:....,....... -..... . ......„,,,-, .......„ . - ... . , , • iLie.. — . •..., ... ....AA ..00 DO ,•• • ... ... .... .. - 1 111P EVIIIIP III II , I .. a , t ..., ., ' !..-, (..0 ... ; t _ /46 z (:.4: 6 0 1111 4 . fl) I 1 lj L[ Ora" . . )AfA. 11 . •••14111114 41 PROPERTY LINE/ZONING MAP l[n‘ti { Attachment 2 3 L - . ....„.....,.-------, i ikVi ''''" , - .i" it tOr a egillitilltr sag il ali 1 / e" ...1 0 P 411111 elliiill i .r. ROLLING 1 . • SECOND ADDITION PARCEL 1 a iilhlIIIlIDI IImIII q w r — .1 r r• o .e • �' ^ N r . N1 d 4 4 4 N ® N N N N N N ~ I N N N N n1 �, 1518 001111111111114 ; • AN • , N M •M M l• 421;):4 1316.® MON ®® 3j*,4. .1 .1 /3 10 ® 131 1311 ROLLING HILLS N N N . / 4 4 4 N N N 1 tz • 1311 ,310 1383 1387 r- 4 4 4 1` M M 1988 1387 1384 MOBILE HOME PARK J 1384• 1383 :Sal,. Iasi 138+ 1383 1332 Ii!I • J „ .� J .1 .► i J N K N N t N M N T • N nAK 'tl,[Ll, COURT 1360 f 311 1333. 1361 1980 1311 . 1 378 L I o \ t { 4 - H ° n " f i " n 1373. 157.5 1378 1377 /371. 1375 151.1• I . N N N N N N N • � • _ N 1371 1371 137 1373 51x 1371 1370 • °.; '' . m T n 7- 7 •N to 131.8 1307 131 1341. 131.3 1341 1544 4 N N „ N N 4 N N N N CI . " a�IL1U ®® ,3,../. i • 4 . N n n .1 i 7 N W /3S3 I N 4 4 J J -3 4 4 .4 1357 ® :3541' N N N N N N N >t i 3S , Z � 1 ® 1355 ,. 13SL 1353 W 1353 : I9So / 1343 • 134,5 1341 u 1331 1351 , 133E l3µ9 . 13 1. } • 1340 13'1 f° 1348 1347 ��L C 1331 133 /SOFA • 1340 1144 • 13 44. 13 t Z .. - 1935 133t )337 1337 1 1337 1338 U 1337 • Ij31 • /33,2•133'3 1335 Am— 1334 /jz �1W ® 1 331 1 313 . 1330 I • 1 „-- ..._.;. ® ®® ® j /311. 1 , ^•. _- -.--+ •• � � /e ® � /S ;/ /3 /k r l .f ? 4 ®® 1 , .120 /3/7 / 3 1 1! 1 7 4 4 J 4 J 4 11 N N N • N N n l CKE • • J C �' • o, m N J a'1 •a ME r m . .y : e` r v � ■ N N N n h 7 ? � N 4 4 J , -.3 H K N N S . N N I N I .4 NI N`• N N N h N N IVY AVE. SITE PLAN /r 4 Attachment 3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Sign Review LOCATION: 1220 South McKnight Road APPLICANT: Elwood Johnson OWNER: Minnesota Conference of Seventh -Day Adventist PROJECT TITLE: Ground DATE: INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to in st al ls a 32- s f - and sign. The sign would have a bri BACKGROUND The Board recently approved 32- square -foot ground signs for the following churches: 1. Arlington Hills United Methodist Church on October 24, 1989 2. Holy Redeemer Catholic Church 2on l ov�ember 28, 1989 3. Salvation Army Church on CODE REQUIREMENT • Section 36 -316 (3) allows ground signs for churches and schools up to 15 nqu16 area. The RevieW Board factors: between 6 q 1. Acreage of the total development; 2. Design of the sign, including lighting; 3. Setback and visibility from a public roadway; 4. Need for identification by the applicant; 5. Public safety concerns; 6. Proximity to low density residential and recreational areas; 7. Overall rnandadesignlof the p r g p h y; 8. The nature DISCUSSION The sign would be attractive and would be a modest size considering the 6.86 acre site area. • • `. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the sign sketch dated September 6, 1990, for Capital city Adventist School. The applicant must remove the existing plywood sign as a condition of this approval. TESIGN (Section 24 -28) Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Proposed Ground Sign • 2 1 0LN , k V r z o sp Fu 5 S 'O e :IKNRIDGEz R CO \ x xF 2 4 • 0 c LINW000 AV CZa 28N,R.22W.' �` 4V "VW() 72 3 5 . 1.,. pP OO CT 2 S14�S =r DAHL O CT °ORLAND >• X to .■■■• J R - Mini Pk F j ;, - 4 po 2 i ; TIMBER U TIMBER LN y Q P MV IS C Q ,....s. OR z r 41 3 CT VALL• ,i..., (3) ¢ VIEW AV m ammo J 74 r (1) N HIGHW000 I- AV 0 9 a 2 0 Ct MAMIE 4 Q 3 VM IE A O - 2 u / W NEM - ITZ AV V w f NE SOUTH ; u THCREST AV o x AV OAK x Z H TS J W 0 4 PkasanWiew / 0- g tu Pk / /'' f LAND C' 1 LN 2 ll ` C \ o rver 4 u 1 4- a' 1�1 s ;W5H0 CHAol O• Fis `ke 72000 Pk r o '' c'............ .../.......... \\....,....: z 1 et A. ob CARVER AV • • 0 l e 43 OVER 22 I LOOK 8 <6. CI R A ' ,P r 4f 0 I x_ J T.28N,R22W 2 k I S234S24 co T-2-64. _ RAMSEY _CO -- — �■ l — �� WASHINGTON CO 494 I' LOCATION MAP 1 [61 N . 3 Attachment 1 / 1 Q,!^ SrE ,,;wt c+42 4' './ x:131' O �.- - - .4. .75 - -- ' d � .o i ac 5:. o . PROPOSED SIGN // _ di �[� / , , S v ( r 3) IGo a f37 1' N __ ' ' b. 86a a > 8 jot Q .75ac (+ t152 3) 3ac. Q � 35 � „ 44 15o y ' GP r 1 D ^ .75ac. t1o327y 83 ac LA I c a CAPITAL CITY ( s) za 0 1 ! s IP ADVENTIST SCHOOL ia i ,83 ac. * 912.j 7 5 ac 19 _ 1_1 W 0 - f t � ( `�2 uI Z 1.00ac - -� (. ?n'1 - -1- .75 *792 3) � — 0, C _ 5 ZI m , 0 9 to j 4, � 4 v 67. i2p '' � I ZO � V , {4 (od_ B r_ : "I� 72.3) • ry X 2 ,.•.-,;,s3-1, . .. 301 54a.c q 41m _ .33 N (� QQ o (30�1 ( 8 60 • le 1 +38U'� , 4. 7 :..L. r � :8; ': I .54G.c en I'4 : , 32)� � +0, a r A'2o 28 ►Si4) 1 z • (7) F c n 'O �2J C. 8 tip ic. f 41ac. ! J n O Y 1 1 a I 1 Zo' _ ``� 4 3yb•3)I � I b 5Q1 .8 6ac ? • { +32x 1255 0 — X20) �� m 1 r ,- - - ? r5 " - r y x 05 0 ' - . 1 a. ti Ct a 9•) . ' 1 ° I- . (.�. .t 1*, •z/9 . • L 27� ; -- 31 m C � ' • - c1 -+ c. ;.+c col l L_ to 3 s I t; ego 10 T .115, S t .29 ac. lo .� I Zanc. 90 ,p o10 1 1 8 0 (211 1 4 • (+205) n ZtS O70 t!7 ;, / I (� • ` ' "g� 3 � 31•2e. � 2 4 ) (23) N (22) (z1) N _ z7 1 • �1' 31.e QtJ 33G d (� M y N l' (It) _ tN (0 4 ` ". • (28) (2l0) f (a �) . � f 90' ; 120 90 -' 90 .. 91 -;30. 50 CO /so' ' 40 1 HS' t� HS' 1x.251 . 95 8o �o.+ • rs. o o � �� �F ti 1n (3) _ (it) °o E A n . ,� a m ,�� 27u .o o �+ [ . T / \ � 9 48 ac. .OR6. 1 . . '49 oc'� c 1 1 •.� /}� n .Jz • • 80 090 1 1 Q 6a�. J - Y,: 34) 36 7 1_,g O � .5) O a 0 r PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP ][01 • 0 1. 4 Attachment 2 4 ..----„.m- M Ni&wr i EACV-SLOPE Ewe:m . L i N E.7 [ t 0 30 - -- f 1 926 • N ( . _ • _al -,„_-_ - / / /colt 25 - • / U. ElA) fkQ a ____ -e, LIAJe t /. --- SEP 0 6 1993 % lac,v.woo in •{ J . L SITE P LAN N Or 5 Attachment 3 1 ` >- o Q c 0.l3 NQ a_od tr e . t . ...j A A o. . 5 0 d' -Q k r A . , Q N !ti 0 , • mimummuniummunwri . 9 ■ai...IU...mp T • 1 ct W � �; I � Ii � i � � i I �� 3 0 a �d...111o.glh 1 �� li� r n a 7 d I I - LK „ 8 `r te r g r, -z s�sb '7O201 7,1 1 71 7tag s.astan°J m cra5 itn°a as xv� xr u it il l 0( f a. C 21 /1-' 4 , At 4. — i 11"411)O s"aiii i g MN l \ Z / 0 \ , I Ny IrZI Z �� , O IV — 1/0 t h� tr Q V' . � cfl . / . 24 if\ - cb . a � o r 1 ,.. .c., a w , . 6t Attachment 4 h • MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJ ECT: SUB Design Review LOCATION: 1200 East Highway 36 APPLICANT: Embers Restaurant PROJECT TITLE: Embers Remodeling DATE: DATE: INTRODUCTION Embers Restaurant proposes to remodel their building exterior by adding more windows, teal- colored dryvit and neon banding. DISCUSSION The proposed building exterior is attractive. The signs, however, are not included in this approval. Signs are reviewed when sign permits are requested. RECOMMENDATION Approval of plans date stamped must eappiylforlsign permits for the Restaurant remodeling. new signs. TEEMBERS (Section 9) Attachments oca ion Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Site plan and buildattachment) ng elevations date - stamped September 10, 1990 (separate 1. • Ge /ya %8 ) ( nvii l Luna � '(,:ii / La<�e ✓ � 1\ 4 KOHL AV l F / �j 1 *Haze /cool • / // y z North I w PR 2 H W �� ix • — l•-• �� co RD c 3- z ` Q ® Ni Kah/AIOA (1) J O. 2 H J PAL C PALM 2 p OVA, CT /4 W v R N Y .. CR 01 r3� 3 _ Z Ha rvest w CONNOR ONNOR . —I- --1 Z g Pk DEMONT AV CT - Ay L_ -'- p (1) CONNOR AV V • ;IR OE- MON p ? F BRO• ?• - OR �1 ` p 3 0 ° '' z C DR v \ ti, HR� '0C T 3 EXTANT z y o( N E O R `) ® 0 4, a XTAN T AV w 43 F r 11111111113 G - G ERVAIS `- V v GRANDJIEW AV = _Iv W cc PKWY , a VIKING OR w Knucke/ Head Lak. J' Kelle/ Lake 9A,,1,1 y • F 3 COPE illr R e) I 4 LARK NUJ tKING 6 �� �� LARK CO o RD �� = v LAURIE z a a E \ O� ° -- RD SAND HURST E woodPkz AURIE ® o LELAND t 0 w • CT. x BURKE CT a J ST c o °A ' .1 RebavArood BURKE rt P A ¢ O ELORIDOE RI: _ a Pk /' ( I) CHAMBERS ST F in ELDRIOG AV ; Pk A r f h• � H W , cc l �Q 0 � F W BEL • _ 0 REC.'? E M• NT q a 1 $ G c r SKILLMAN y � • R RIS ,, µ � E > > _ FN • L; N K N • /j � P u RY AN S A Lu MT. V RNON ✓ TR AIL F I- a 3. q (40.i/ AVcr Flicek CA o / FROST .LL 000 AV / 27 V' W FEN TON AV 111 re f Gbyler w 3 W � + l 1 ♦ Q i P kFRI SBIE AV I P a RIPLEY ¢ x I, ' a s Y ® / �.•.r NI x I ! )WiKiPIEW E 44 V //U i Round / / /� N W �o LAKE ac A I eke \ t Z a PRICE / • 0 4 QF �)`� -� TE 1 QR ( La ke Phaten �.I % 1. • 64 r s) PAUL 62 . e 1 LOCATION MAP N 2 AttaaN►ant 1 . . ,., HIGHWAY 36 FRONTAGE ROAD ,:.-- 1 ! <)e' _...... _ -,------No A cue • —"I 1 17 ,.-Ii. - _ • - . -4 -....e.----• • 0(„orio COUNTRY SIDS VW ,...;---,6_,-;_i.A.,..„,;.:014.51- -: _ .: - - 6 1 .: 3 -t w. =' 1 . • ENBERs :4101 'tall , ,. •• . C RESTAURANT:'' (e) ' , - , - - - -7 - -- a - 6 - 4 --- —1" , ..3 .69ar. (to) +I :' VA 5 4) e' 0 _ 'V . ..1 ro- Ilka> -go 14 .- • 4, .. -• -, ,... - . ., 6z) • .139 a.. : i , 1 '■Jr! C' :- el '''''. 1 ' • I p .,, ..„ CO i . , 110 . _ _ a 90. _ . , . _ 2 3e, - i 45 14 ta ...*,,, . .„ __. ..... . . .. -1' I OC - .iitid re' isigiiilg_stat lamp. woo itilf • . _ 11 1.86.4c) o .1.bae. 1 I 2.1 -0 23 29 t • III . 11,,1051.512. 4 (2) CLI; fu ,E, I t7 I lb I 15 , 2• . 211 2 • , I I I • • • - I _ill i g 7 . 1Q 255' : - - - a 31 6 Mi 1 01 141 /6 - _ _ e -- 1 - . 2.1 36 Z&134 ;301 34 . i.. 24)1 Iti2) i 611 I 101 J.• 1 1 1 - Af 1 1 -,- T r , , , ,.. , ■-• -1" I - ' 15114 c1111101- 1 i8.7 ,c, 5,41,542 :1•6 151 1 . 43 : 12 1 ( W I II i / . t. ., 07S r _ ' I CI 11 I l? 8) 67) I I (.4,), 1 9.44 tI (140 I • / • ,, 1 40 40 5- : 5. '. 4. LI, 44 .I &b I Jo •_ ,3 1111 Oil SI El IRA III -.- 0 J LARK •-,' .. . - . %•-• .47 ac 1. 01 no. - Olog 40 40 16, 116 , 19 1 . ' 75 ' * 130 is 1 1 1 NI A .; ; 75 e . 4i ( ■ (+ NA , 4 1.( ! 1.4 ) 1 11 :(.44) . •(5s- 1,@4 1 0, .■ (" ----, I . 4 ' . • '1' 44' 17 I ICI 1 - 13 ',122 2.4 -#.' '3 ' lf•4• 1 Zb 7,`,5 30, f I t7 ' t 1 2 )1 I I ri.. , * • /4,2 . + „ . ,- .. t !!! 0" ._7 -- -- ,, .. ....„ _ I,_ _ .:::t ...: . .:_t_ 10. I. — • I CO • 1 1 3 ' • r ... Te. I I 1 A (S) ( .. 1 (34)1 1 1 i ,.. 44 , 4 , , I -1 I ...- ''.-.:,' ",-: „1-149:4- II 1 ZS ii tc l . 1 . r r -4 • • 4- 1 et , 7 1 615141. i 312i:1;1 i tc •.•, 15 1 !? 1 1 1•.: ( i 4 ,41ar. o15 i41 13 1 it.T1i 1 vo i pi • ',.., 4 I 1-'1 (3‘)I i ir.ss,; 1Cs4ii I' 1 i j '-'6-4i :51 i(s.., _ 0 ; 13 34 I l'." 1 ,., 4 601.1(..9_14c_i_.. - 20 L 1_4_0 LA [4_0140 , 3.. 7.;‘,.. i :, - z . /4, _ , , 14 6 • ,o COUNT-Y RO-AD-----B•_ _ I- , , ! .72 k 32 ■32 1 - 1 - - 1 1 7 4o, i",...51 ! - !1* 3 = - "I r 'l7 r4o I . r 5 1 (27) ,..... 1.., ,i). 1 ,4.3), l et, ii !, ! . ! 4:„-. - .i3 - ..5.) 1 (7,,.,--- c . 49.sc . ': " I ' I ' • r- 15 a 15 yi 4» 1 22 1 ZS I . .6 ', 23 " 144 IG ;7 ! 13 139T zo 1 41 1 :2. d'e . J 4 a) . ( z 4 - ' _ ,, . - I 1„ 1 1 c 4 , , 1 , . i d L 0 2. 9 -. ag - v t.." 1 ,-,- ( _ 6 1--__I- ---i----t----,=-5- r - 1 - - I - i ts 4r s rr l - 14 ifi i 4 lto 4o ; . I 1 I , i 1 . , 1 2 1 5ac 1, i - I . ." 1 * , ik i •, `-l . ( 2 - 5 ) .33ac. (z8-) ' 1 13 1 1 II I 19 t 8 7 '- 5 J.t3.1. - T1 '' 15 14 . i 13 , 121 li 1 0 I I - 1,47c)1414)1 6)1 Vialfei) I ,i1 1(') 65)1 , )1 1(7,;) 4 '.• 1:0 1 1(.6)1 1 172 1 . 1 . s• 4 s ss 3 s 35 5- 1 55 ) I Lo ! 40 4034.0 140 ^. . • 13412017-IS . t g ' 0 — 723._ \ • ..: — 4 LEL AND Fl ' 7 5 3 4 el s 8S , $01 . Sail 245 •. .41 .• 1 .0 19 1 T (4 0, 22 . 23 • 1 1.;64:0.,41:0 7: 531i 1 4311 34 ; 4o1 0 I:01; ; - ; • I - 1 - . : .e.. 1 0 . 53a c k.•:. .5. 3.s....c 54361 6 V3)(1Z) (/32.) 33)1 (.34) 1 *) 103(0) j _., 1 .' ; p--)1 !6 i & I 5s ,....„, 7 .(.31!, ... ".:, „ , ..,44• 1.1 1 1 2 I 1 26 24 7 1 21 1 50 V ....444 .7 10.101120i r N e PROPERTY LINE/ZONING MAP N , • L ......_...........___ ... ■ 3 Attaebit•nt 2 la 0 HIGHWAY 3 6 FRONTAGE { ROAD , t " 7 .-mmilliala ., .■, I . r . , i.„ ._, ..„, . .... ,.. '1,1 ,c........_,,,..1 ,:-,„ . , .. . . _ ,. II ,,J., , g, ., 1 ,______ t , ,,,,--------- ...„ i -- : 6 C' i0 5 i t i e tc, 1 EMBERS • /1 I OlLr 1 RESTAURANT 1 II rid- L iil I I 1 j y3R SL: -.,. i I • I ∎ ® I a o 0 0 0o c+ ° : O ' I * • ;:.I Fj}iidrai10 .,roNturwa- '�f�n I - r cd drs*G"�= Qom_* 1 SITE PLAN 4 () ‘ N • 4 AttaCb gent 3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Condition Revision and Design Change LOCATION: Gall Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: Richard Schreier PROJECT TITLE: Twin Home DATE: September 13, 1990 INTRODUCTION Mr. Schreier is requesting: 1. Deletion of condition 5 of the Community Design Review Board's approval of a twin home on Gall Avenue. Condition 5 required that there be a 30 -foot setback from the County Road D right -of -way line. Mr. Schreier proposes to cantilever the rear wall of the building two feet towards County Road D to enlarge the living area of the units. The proposed setback of the cantilevered part of the structure would be 28 feet. 2. Revision of the building elevations for the cantilever. Mr. Schreier does not have the revised elevations prepared yet. • BACKGROUND On April 24, 1990, the Board approved the twin home. On June 25, 1990, the City Council approved the Board's motion while considering an appeal submitted by neighbors. DISCUSSION The Board required a 30 -foot rear setback from County Road D to match the typical front setback along this street. Code does not, however, define what the minimum rear yard setback shall be when the rear yard abuts a street. The minimum rear yard setback typically required is 20% of the lot depth; 20 feet in this instance. Reducing the rear setback from 30 to 28 feet would not cause any problems in this case. Four lots to the west front Gall Avenue. County Road D angles away from Gall Avenue, increasing the rear yard setbacks. The proposed cantilever should have no negative effect on the building's appearance. 7 ' • __ RECOMMENDATION Revise condition 5 to read, "The home shall be built at least 28 feet from the County Road D right -of- way." The revised building design with a two -foot cantilever is approved, subject to final approval by Staff. TETWIN (Section 1 -29) Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Approved Side and Rear Elevations 5. Letter from Mr. Schreier dated September 6, 1990 • • 2 • u ' L.... WHITE BEAR LAKE F-B (I) RRfNWDOD CURvf A i& • ti- s' ` GALL AV MB a ° 0 WOODLY N AV Q W J W �d (I) E .SRENNER fN a V1000LYNN AV 4 NR SS o d W�l Y = O, O N O �1 1A x CT$ AV N ado x • � 131.V0 1Ap Li lY 0 PVE Y WI H y < -1 ` AV - ' LAKE 0 CO iz 8 W pP 0 z RIDGE t- .a • ' 1 Q cx �V J tLd W ' N n �� yy � 2 STS. . m �� , I " I 2 VA-I- c _ MAP E ( a •• \ Y -C\�� 0 Cr 0 V 2 ( C n. _. eE AM AV a /:‹. SILVER LAKE 1 • 1 Z x MAPLE VIEW AV u v `- , 03 W `A ^`N1)11 ) �� u Q RADAT1 a AV IYl�: 1 I �YI� Lr ) x I /1 W D 0 ill - = _= G8 to I a ( (f 1 B (2 1 PRIVATE STREET W KOHLMAN AV AirSVEN AV) lc NORTH SAINT PAUL 23 0 CO > RD ..C.. i 3i2 4 HILL RD 10111 x w+ 0 1 in W Q I ELE E. a PJ AV GERvAI GERVAIS AV CT /� y ,A .... AV Eti �// 1- AY 1 OPE )'AV • F.. 1 G4 ,_ g N N 0 = F I 2 a in W 1 g J j RlERO 2 RD B" I / I (� S , LOCATION MAP 3 N ATTACHMENT 1 . 2636.35 • - 30 NORTH _ - 3 , + � ' TOWNSHIP 2• = • -pi a 2378 "'°_ 1 ) a , 4. • , •1 �6 .e� 2 68.4'1' s�t.12 V A tea s ' . f9,1 a ! IQ w �� 2//396 2396 2408 _ lr!� a w 4 a 40 4i - '- , � h ......c., ; • T ' + (7 (7s) ;� 6 �- :� ❑ a. -4,------1 1 - - - 4 .•r (.•: + ^ (99 3119,•. o no ^ + ` 5 ". @s 17 ta s - 3111 736" 2376' 4 2388 2400 2406 AVE. 2474 r xo 3113 _ ac �� o n s..1 ie Vo c. eo " 2436 sz � S46 1. X 18 * ' -► - (ss) N , _ - 9 23 82 ; - -23 4 -- —t I3 14 t+ 15 ,a 040 A 1 04A4 E N i 11 O W ~ ~ • , f fj 20 002) � •3 � • ' h s, RI - —1! — AT • G•. PIP = LINE 40 40 10.a`' ' - • _ i ce , • � � 5 . a III 111 • K � �'. "U ■ i .4) .. % S" 87.11 60 05 60.05 40 u ■ - 'r 13.2 E •• N ,` • 45) CAI S` ^ (G) ^ �+) 3 • IO • 11 12 • ' 1t) , � 1 30 d Ili I / - /40 60 (IS) ((3) IS 1 ♦ .r (40) I Cr .s a) .. (l) 1 / �) a Ib o b /. ,, Q , 2,,-/ ' , S T BRENNER AVE ♦� EAS BRENN£R s • • se M if ( • (1s) let 41A s � aG 2I A, �)•. ' 0. " Z'�)'`� • 1• �,. s0 � w 17 4, t 3 � ) I ill) ` �, r •1 2 � 'sa 1 i. C+s) � , Z4 r 5___01.12_. 7 } •‘ 14 l * f =� -1 V s. 07 2 + �. 2 L n a e 1 .+ ( 1 J —, (r,) I (s!) • % ( • es to • . s,ss o !I 0 13 Cry ' 4 4 '^ 12 Z ,) ... i • .es ► 3• "46' ., 4 W t: 1 I � • (cc) • _ �.� ` 1 ^ ' • © ? , f e n c "' , . �L� ) a , • (3e) �1 • 1 / 1 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP O 4 Attachment 2 N \ / N. £ 1N3WHDVIIV 5 N NY1d � LIS �. • n N2n d .: 77k9 ‘' it i c g . 0. i M „or ,9? • N ° 3� 49 �o‘ I ° o o1LV3VA 3e 01 '� -- =1N3w38V3 ON :31 t / of d o S t--, (- 7 )176171 vN/ 7M11 11N72/1 IN IN ' 57 _.__.._�, .7— �-- 1 10'1 1153 L ., 0/ r L. - / ! 8 --, - / ....... 4 .' t _ -Lo W r _ / 2 'C / o .LA9NPSb� Ali ' ^'1 ,f4,7.4:61' '' •6/ e � N 1 ONie YNi 0 0 • . ,0 -4110 - J, ._ • • 1 r • • • • 1• Horizontal Aluminum Siding •••••••••• •: = - - ' Aluminum Soffit f - •,_,_mm .......... _••- •••■- .---- -:...• ••• and Fascia . ..1 . ....) I t rnyn.11111 • _ •_ _ __• — • • 1 :, ' • Verticle Aluminum Siding - . ..s . c i g • • • . •••••■■■••• • ••• • • • ��� • i r I L • •••••• ••••••• _• r! • =ME.. 1 r• • • r• �•_�• • I • • 1 •� ∎ ._r•�• L,r_L_ _4 1 i • �•.. •fir• N.. _ ••.• • •••• »•• • r _ _ •Horizontal Al Siding — _ � ; _�_j _ ifi , I r i 1`' — __ • • • .•...• •._� • •• . • ear Eeva rillfili • [11° . APPROVED SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS 6 Attachnent 4 J DeSoto Associates P.D. Box 17830 • St. Paul, MN 55117 -7830 • 7751inavirp September 6, 1990 City of Maplewood Design & Review Board 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 ATTN: Geoff Olson Dear Mr. Olson: Kindly place DeSoto Associates on the agenda for September 18, 1990 to consider a request to change the . rear set back for the dwelling on Lot 1 to twenty - eight feet (28'). The code does not require a thirty foot (30') rear set back. Sincerely, DeSoto Associates R. J. Schreier Enclosure 7 Attachment 5