The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990-07-17 CDRB Packet MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JUNE 5, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Moe called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Donald Moe Present Tom Deans Present Marvin Erickson Present Roger Anitzberger Present at 7:02 p.m. Michael Holder Present at 7:05 p.m. Daniel Molin Present at 7:08 p.m. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. May 22, 1990 Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the minutes of May 22, 1990, as submitted. Boardmember Deans seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA • Boardmember Deans moved approval of the agenda as submitted. Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Building Design - Schroeder Milk Company Maintenance Garage, 2080 North Rice Street Steve Knutson, Wolfgram Knutson Architects, was present at the meeting representing Schroeder Milk Company. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of architectural plans date stamped May 23, 1990, for a 54- by 75 -foot maintenance garage for Schroeder Milk Company, Inc., at 2080 North Rice Street. Approval is subject to compliance with the previous conditions of November 29, 1988. Boardmember Anitzberger seconded Ayes- -Moe, Deans, Erickson, Anitzberger, Holder, Molin 411 Community Design Review Board -2- • Minutes 6 -5 -90 6. DESIGN REVIEW a. Wall Sign Proposal - T- Birds, 3035 White Bear Avenue Secretary Ekstrand explained the staff report for the proposed four - foot - diameter neon clock /sign on the upper building fascia, which would go above their new expansion area. Boardmember Anitzberger moved approval of plans date stamped May 22, 1990, for a four - foot - diameter neon clock /sign for T -Birds at 3035 White Bear Avenue. Boardmember Holder seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson, Anitzberger, Holder, Molin b. Parking Lot Expansion - Advertising Unlimited, Inc., 1700 Gervais Avenue Mr. Carr was present representing Advertising Unlimited, Inc., and spoke regarding the recommended • condition of the staff report which would require catch basins. Mr. Carr asked for clarification on the staff report condition requiring escrow. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of plans date stamped May 22, 1990, for Advertising Unlimited, Inc., to expand the parking lot, subject to the following conditions: (1) The parking stall layout shall be revised as shown on staff's alternative proposal in the staff report. Drive aisles shall be at least 24 feet wide and parking spaces for employees -only shall be at least nine feet wide and posted as such. (2) The new parking areas shall be striped in a double - stripe "hairpin" design and all new bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. (3) A detailed grading /drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. This plan shall provide two catch basins. (4) The proposed berm shall be at least three feet 111 tall and shall not exceed a slope of 3:1. The Community Design Review Board -3- • Minutes 6 -5 -90 berm shall be sodded. The top of the berm shall be planted with 15 three - foot -tall Colorado Spruce. (5) All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained. Required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owner within one year. (6) Three handicap parking spaces shall be provided close to the building. Handicap parking signs shall be provided. (7) All site lights shall be shielded or screened so not to cause any glare beyond the property lines. (8) The applicant shall provide an escrow, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by the time the parking lot is completed. The applicant shall also provide proper documentation, to be approved by the City • Attorney, which allows staff access onto the property to finish work that may not be completed. Boardmember Deans seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson, Anitzberger, Holder, Molin c. Site Redesign and Building Replacement - U Haul, 2242 White Bear Avenue Steve Lonergan was present representing U Haul. Mr. Lonergan discussed the proposed requirement for a developer's agreement for the construction of a watermain within the White Bear Avenue right -of -way. The Board discussed with Mr. Lonergan concerns with allowing the existing building to remain in use while the new building is being constructed. Mr. Lonergan said U Haul would be brick on three sides and steel on the rear. Boardmember Deans moved: 1. Approval of plans date stamped May 22, 1990, for U- Haul's site redesign and building replacement, subject to the following conditions: 411 • Community Design Review Board -4- Minutes 6 -5 -90 a. Trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures in accordance with Section 36 -27. Trash enclosures and gates shall sit flush on the ground to prevent debris from blowing out from underneath. b. Mechanical equipment placed outside or on the roof shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. Screening is subject to Board approval. c. Parking areas shall be striped in a double - stripe "hairpin" design and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. d. Board review shall be repeated if construction has not begun within two years. e. Site security lighting shall be provided and directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. f. Adjacent property that is disturbed or property irons removed due to this construction shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. g. Grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plans shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. The applicant shall enter into a developer's agreement for the construction of watermain within the White Bear Avenue right -of -way. The details and surety requirement shall be determined by the City Engineer. h. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained. Required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owner within one year. i. Reflectorized stop signs, building addresses and handicap parking signs shall be provided. j. Public boulevard that is disturbed shall be restored and resodded. • Community Design Review Board -5- Minutes 6 -5 -90 k. Signage is not part of this approval. Signs shall be reviewed by staff. 1. The building exterior shall be continually and properly maintained. m. An in- ground sprinkling system shall be installed for all landscaped areas. n. The revised parking plan date stamped May 31, 1990, is approved. Customer spaces must be at least ten feet wide. Employee parking spaces may be nine feet wide if they are posted for employee parking only. o. The retaining wall design shall be subject to staff approval. p. Approval of the drainage easement vacation by the City Council. q. Fuel tank removal shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Marshal. r. The existing building can remain until the new one is completed, provided that all building code and parking code requirements are met and subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. s. The applicant shall provide an escrow, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. The applicant shall also provide proper documentation, to be approved by the City Attorney, which allows staff access onto the property to finish work that may not be completed. 2. Vacation of the ten - foot -wide drainage easement, based on the findings that: a. It is in the public interest. b. There is no need for the drainage easement since the storm sewer pipe is located in the vacated alley to the south. Community Design Review Board -6- Minutes 6 -5 -90 Approval is subject to: a. The applicant providing documentation that the City has a drainage easement over the adjacent vacated alley, or b. Dedicating a drainage easement to the City over the vacated alley. Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson, Holder, Anitzberger, Molin 7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS a. Interviews for CDRB Vacancy The Board interviewed Harry Voss. Boardmember Deans moved to table additional interviews 410 until July 17 when other possible applicants could be present for interviewing. Boardmember Molin seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans, Erickson, Holder, Anitzberger, Molin Marie Robinson arrived at this time and was interviewed for the CDRB vacancy. 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS a. July Meeting Rescheduled: Cancel July 10 and Reschedule to July 17 b. Tentative July 17 Agenda (1) Addition to St. John's Northeast Hospital (2) Code Amendment - Conversion of Standard Policies into Ordinance 10. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9 p.m. . MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Design Review LOCATION: 1575 Beam Avenue (Section 3) APPLICANT /OWNER: HealthEast - St. John's Northeast Hospital PROJECT TITLE: Perinatal Care Addition DATE: July 10, 1990 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1. St. John's Hospital is requesting approval to build a 65,289 square foot, two -story addition. 2. The proposed brick would match the existing building. The first story on the south and west elevations would have an accent of rock -face concrete block painted gray. The peaked, standing -seam metal roofs shown are an alternate treatment and might be omitted. BACKGROUND • On May 20, 1982, Council approved a conditional use permit CUP for the hospital and related medical facilities. Council renewed the CUP on May 23, 1988 for five years. On August 23, 1983, the Design Review Board approved the hospital design plans. RECOMMENDATION Approval of plans date stamped June 20, 1990, for a two -story building addition to 8t. John's Northeast Hospital, subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. The original conditions of August 23, 1983 shall apply to this project. 2. The applicant shall repeat this review if construction has not begun within two years. 3. Grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plans shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. 411 c r 4. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained. The owner must replace all dead plantings within one year. 5. The building eztarior shall be continually and properly maintained. 6. All Firs Department access roads must be maintained at all times during and after construction. Parking for patient pick -up at the main lobby must not block firs lanes. 7. The applicant shall provide an escrow, in a form acceptable to Staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. The applicant shall also provide proper documentation, to be approved by the City Attorney, which allows Staff access onto the property to finish work that may not be completed. Appeals Appeals of the Review Board's motion must be made in writing to the City Staff within ten days of the Board's approval. 110 • 2 i REFERENCE BITE DESCRIPTION 1. Site size: 21 acres 2. Existing Land Use: St. John's Northeast Hospital SURROUNDING LAND USES Northerly: Undeveloped hospital property and parking lot Southerly: Beam Avenue Easterly: Medical offices Westerly: Hazelwood Avenue PLANNING 1. Land Use Plan designation: DC, Diversified Center 2. Zoning: BC, Business Commercial PUBLIC SAFETY 1. All Fire Department access roads must be maintained at all times during construction. 2. Parking for patient pick -up at the main lobby must not block • fire lanes. TEHOS Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. August 23, 1983 CDRB motion 4. Plans date stamped June 20, 1990 (separate attachment) 411 3 • • • • • .____� WHIT %ADNAIS HEIGHTS 61 46 - 1� �� COUNTY ROAD �O� :y • . - ,:..,,::,:.;:::::::.:.•;'"'•'".. - ..... ...• • . ... • \ . . - . - - T3ONR!!M ! .,. 1 s / 2fNR2[M� _.O ` f-- r 1 AVE. • • i___ . • - 1 / f ".: .. 3 RAOA T2 V / / iv Ai u _ < N 1 KONLNAN AVE. ci :*/ AW 23 1. 1 ' ROAD In .C >c : - • ____ i i II y �� J W W J1 ) _ u _ J E OG E Nltl R0. � / � - t J D w DEYONT . AVE.rI H W �. • o 0 A 4 II 111 AVE. • w lo122 • : E - � � � r SEX • ' ..1------ GERVAIS AVE. 1 OERVAIS �t RVA AVG .:ii:E 0 ItANDV1EII II AVE. I CCtNtT `\ D !VIKING II DR• 1 ► Ile AV V��- 1 SHER3EN AV N AVE.:,i:] y :.24•67' e'3•. ++ •‘ • EE I AVE. I / O��I�VE. .7 J LARK ywECT. r( LARK AV E, w I p LARK r w ::., :i y ft t ) (LAURIE J� D. J z II : ..7-: 1 �OUNTT ►� om a lLAURIEI ei � z (LELAND II E1 I•+•� ZS _ z D AVE. �� / ( 1 • • . • LOCATION M • 4 Attachment 1 N • •■■•••••■■ .• l I ■ e l 1 I le .. , , • - .. ... 1 - - • ,t... e: - - - - - ' ' - ' - - * • • :1 ''' - - - - \ r• - . - 1 ,, % --- .... s t • , . ,, . ' 1 , ... - - • • /'-'--.--------- .1 II . ' ■ i 0 % \ 7.....":7."•••••■, ' 1 I I ,,,...... I I I I t• I I , _ - I •• .• • - - \,,,..........1 -ailli I 1 ' , • . 'a./ 1 , , .."... \ 1 r i' : • 4. , j , . . . ' .... „ _.— . -- .. 1. •••-., \ , ,-•, 1 / I \ .., '`:•:*-- — .• . \ . 1 • • - • - z..... \ , 1 - • • S. • '' -- ' • i. • s . I , ' I ! I • .- . , 1 . ., ; , . - ' - ,, ,-...., • i I • , • • - 1, . ' • .., • I , =Sr, ......e , . . (.... . t ......... . *6 ....-, ...... i 4 i I • . . • %.1- 1 • ' . 'S • - •• •• - I • " 4 ( ...• ‘ i ii ir : n . . . ..... 1. . . _ . , ' I 1 2 ' , . •. .. • 41 / ! 1 1 • %. 't , I . ....• a I l 04; • , p......) , _ . .. ' - • I ... ' 4 i nip 1 . At '-: k.:: . ' .. :•■"'" '" ' . ,.., 1 \ . .. "...J K., • , . lin 'ilks, _ ....... '...•A ',.. - . .. ;1 ; I ' ., A-1 ■ ano■ 4 0 • - 1. ; \ ___ ._. _ . , A. .... .- . t ., i „. \ • ....L........... a! 7"--.- : ;:- : kebis“:tI,,1 I—, ..----. 4 . . ' '' 1 • am& avows. •••• .. . 0 g 01 1 : 1 9 5 e 2 i 1 . 6 .- r , /,,, . f , .: 1 . , ! , .: , ; , .',1:.:,:;: , ::. . ,. ‘.. , -- „,„,,,,..„.-5? - 7 — '- • - ..' " % \-.. I. .".. K? V., — .. 4 .' , ... .'" . j ■'■ \ ! ....: -14 ' ' ' A. t 1 ': '7'7: ''' ... .-- 2 :7 - ' •.:-'..; ,:i. ' 7:7. % .....: : . li ' ' ■ ' • .. .• .. . • \......1.7...; ..! uls:al' --"Not....,,,-,. , ii ..... . % : 5 ,7 : ": .L:." - 7 : 7 ", .'S.' - c.: • ..7.-- ' :7 • •- ,t ,..,•,..„4.: , ',",- ' —....)...-......Z.• 1 I 1....••••••••t> -- ,, , 1 ,',.: , .. -,,..4.,... 'tv ,..;:b....,,,, , ,r):0 . , ,..t ....= tr"'.. '.. '............... • . I ... ! t 11V/4 Illix.., , ' _',';' „. / • -,:/:.^. . ^91C : - - 4 ."'",„ ' Nige; .44 _ -• . '.• • ..- A -- -. s r- •'.' V•,:%"'" ' ' ' ' ' -. 7*....'"..., • '';' ,-*,, 1 '',, f .., - s i 0 * ....- --- \ 71---- •: v4Y --, --, L ' --7 - - - - ..z , - - '...': A ••••.' - . :.,..l '-:::.-- "'"---.--%:: 3 ;,:-:- -.,----, -d-.--- \ sv ' , -..--.!-.,-,- . N' • - -. .,,.. /:...„ .„.' ., .....; ,. . . ,..• ,. , ,::. ,/ , •••! . ---1 -s-ti 4- .7....=. ' 1 , •■• .■....-1 ''. --..--"::.: g –'. 7., ,' s \ ‘ ,,.--------... ‘ . ‘ -•,,____ N \,,, ,,, ... = Oi l :; .' .......:___...-_.--....--_-_,,\.' • , .\,.._, ........,_% ..iii,e, / v ......... i ...,) , 11 I „ .... , , ......,.......... ;.....: _ ... ...., , ..7 : Is.; 1 . _..._......... i ‘.,_ V \ '‘..`Y,...,.• i ■• ., ',. •,,,....... --__ •-• • ' ... 'C ...._..... -....y.....=.• .., ,, •-..S. • , , .r,' • ',. • 1 . \ , . •., -, - -/---", • e • : , e--1 :-..-- •• •■ • 44gr • '•-". -.. ...• - , II= ' , / • , mu, • '' i \ . . , , . • _ .......41.1.M.......... .1111.. ... - -- - - -- ...=...,iAnTars- - 7 -----•.--, •••.- • - _,,Mr:;.•-.,..45 7 --•-•-• - ••■• 1 , ...........-1---..----...., - ...T17.16MMIIMIMNYLI MIS tr....M6 •■ ■•■■• i . .. . './ .i 1 i 1 r / I =,...... ....-....p a A A A4 AVE. i / • I I • . - ....--•— •0 I kb , I I. SITE PLAN . 41. 5 Attachment 2 Board Member Rossbach moved theJoard recouped appcpval of plAns date stam•ed : -9 -83 for the t. n' .• •' ' conditions: 1. Approval of plans by the Board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 2. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in masonry enclosures with 100% opaque wooden gate according to ordinance, and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Location and design shall be subject to staff approval. 3. Any exterior building or roof -top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view. The screening material is subject to staff approval. 4. An erosion control plan for construction shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. 6. If construction has not begun within two years of approval, Board review shall be repeated. 7. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 8. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 9. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. 10. A landscaping plan shall be submitted for Board approval. 11. The applicant shall construct a 8 -foot wide blacktop bicycle /pedestrian trail along Beam Avenue right -of -way. The exact location shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. 12. Reflectorized, state approved handicap parking stall signs and stop signs shall be provided. Board Member Rovie seconded Ayes - -all. 8 -23 -83 4111 6 Attachment 3 • MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Design Review LOCATION: Clarence Avenue behind Richard's Market (Section 15) APPLICANT: Tim Eldridge OWNERS: Tim, Cathy, Jeffrey and Sherry Eldridge PROJECT TITLE: Woodbury Mechanical Equipment Storage Building DATE: July 13, 1990 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1. The applicant is requesting approval of plans to build a 40- by 45 -foot, one -story storage building. The exterior would be stone -face concrete block, horizontal aluminum siding and fascia and asphalt shingles. 2. The applicant may install the fence at a later time. DISCUSSION (landscaping /screening and driveway specifications) The site is screened from the adjacent homes by hedges and trees. Landscaping should be provided to improve aesthetics from the • easterly view. See page 5 for a suggested planting plan. The entrance drive should be 20- feet -wide with a turnaround for fire apparatus, as required by the Uniform Fire Code. RECOMMENDATION Approval of plans date stamped July 6, 1990, for the proposed Woodbury Mechanical storage building. The applicant /owner must meet the following conditions: 1. Provide screening enclosures around any outdoor trash dumpsters as code requires. Trash enclosures and gates must sit flush on the ground to prevent debris from blowing out from underneath. 2. Screen all mechanical equipment placed outside or on the roof. Screening is subject to Board approval. 3. Stripe the parking area in a double - stripe, "hairpin" design. Parking and driveway areas shall be bituminous. Parking lots and drives must be kept in a maintained fashion. 4. Repeat this review if construction has not begun within two years. • i 5. Install site security - lighting. This lighting must be directed or shielded to not cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 6. Replace property irons if removed by the construction. Repair and restore any adjacent property if damaged by the construction. 7. Submit a grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plan for the City Engineer's approval. 8. Install a building address on the building and at the driveway entrance. 9. Resod the boulevard if damaged by the construction. 10. Keep all outside materials within the fenced area. 11. Submit a landscape plan for Staff approval providing for: a. shrubbery and one tree in front of the building; b. two, 2 1/2 inch caliper balled and burlapped trees north of the entrance drive. c. sod north and south of the entrance drive. • 12. Keep all landscaping and sod areas continually maintained. Dead plantings must be replaced within one year. 13. Widening the driveway to 20 feet with a turnaround by the building, subject to the Fire Marshal's approval. 14. Provide an escrow, in a form acceptable to Staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any required improvements that are not completed by occupancy. The applicant shall also provide documentation, to be approved by the City Attorney, allowing Staff onto the property to finish any work that may not be completed. Appeals The applicant may appeal the Board's decision within ten days of their motion. Appeals are considered by the City Council. TEWOOD Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Plans date stamped July 6, 1990 (separate attachment) 2 e i - ! 1 1 1 GERVA r • i i �J \ c.) GRANDVIEW AV s 1... PKWY Y kil i VIKING OR - 7N I . r 4 I I F ir P. i C OPE a COPE k/e Ham' KB / /BI LO/�'e 1 , L ARK W ^ � �� J a a CO g RO • ac ) f 0 2 LELANO RO A ND- PM ci - ' 1 BURKE CT < JU • N ST v �_ 0 • O , p ' AbaJiMoos / � � (I) CHAMIIMI ST ELORI00 al t et Z ) if z 1- rift#Ot 4 '• -•-■ I IIMI ■ s - GO )D I�E1'. ES Ow o :` RY- IS/ o/ t TRA/L....,_ Q F/Awk ' F ROST 4 A i i ,. I r ► Oa ® � W FE ON AV . l y < I p! � i - �SU .. ?� IP 1 y '� � 3 ° a FRIS9IE AV /ICUS e,ri fo :, 1,1 RIPLEY i ..,1 . i • 1 I `ek Y ? i 5 gill ' ~ -../4, 1 , ~LAK t' \,.. . (,,\ ............... ,\\\Atels C .. itO V .::.::.:::...:...:.:. PAUL 64 J illi° LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment 1 j[ N .] ____ • . 1 ° a s.esl - -. SC HOOL 1 * 1 1. `V 17v = ---- - -- ---, 0 III IIII,. t ' 4 _II _14_2,11 P ' u '11 I sf- ; ' IGz • T.- : 1 e J . ' 9 i / . 10 17 ,!..:-6 -‘ 7 r, a. 12 IS o S i 1 . — .• IN, — 14 ni 0 ' + ' �• 1'10 • 1 R�.. �II • �o .„ •n, aL —a . 54 - 1 �c�a nei 4O is c>I �. . ' - j• u IS aia � ? � n n tca. 8 so —_ — • Ilf 1 44 ■ X900 1 t 1 30 .- it � =; ' � ..� $ (I) 2 � z91 9 ' — SP ' 90 `! 8 (3D ` 3 28(11)' ; • : ( tri p • ii 27 4, .•t _' 4a . "l 4( • 1I 25 1 r G 25 • t •• N 3 — i `qii, ...: 24(x)' ' 7 CO 0°124 m t ! r _ 0 - 4 .. ;i ::. - _ — 41 ,r- (3) 22 7 - v I 22 • ' to ,,—.. — 1 r - —, 12 • 1 ° ' ( ' ;. (35S) 19 ' 12 I j • I/ scw ' — _ rr� } -• h • � ■ 1 a • 13 is p-' -�.... :f t.t — • • — • • . -317"7/r.. • ( t4. • ( 17 ' • ' (0 14 j (1 17 N/. (I°o' 0 0 • ./ ' 7 ' v 19)15 1 vs j w +lJi •t.a1C. Q : lS w`� S '9 0 ,01 . SUMM f 0 • I ,. 4 i� t [211141 o g d , . ID � ,1 . 1,. ,5o 4 _ 1 j o _ • 3 1 . " 30 - I - 1 ' 3 2 tke :w c •gy . ' 29 • '(3 `I 1 29(` 2 4 2� • • ..p 1 , • 3 tk) 3 1 1 2e • • 3 14; � to • Y t _ � ° - - — t , s ' z 41) 4, — +� 25 1 ••' 26 , a 1 - 1 _. ill Ira li m _ 7 - 2» -: W '► — _ • • � ( ;, F Z4 '1 1 ge c1 , _054) 9 • • � 1- _ _ WI, e • (I,) 23 ' J ', • e 2 3 49) 8 101 23 '1 I Jr • — > Q • ( 9 — _ 22 0 . (44 9 _ 1 1 ( 22 t (10 1 _22 — - • (85) 10 10 21(72)• ' 43')10 ) 21 + lo t,.. 11 • . n 1 1 * f 20_ - _ " , r l to ( 11(h� I i) 20 •, V 12 ' ... !2 (It�?9 ( M) ;i4,_./14 L 15 • _ .1_-. 12 1 15 i 1 _(QfG) IS •( - 1) t3 _ ,(701 iIIS_ ' (45! I(47) 15 + 13(QDA • 11 3 = , , _ 1. J ,, r 14 -i i ..__ 17 (=x) • 1 • i hi s. r f PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 N ■ , v 0 r r -r I 40 r- 9 ( / 171 CV N IN.1 ■ -% I I I I I I-' .7.- _E 1 II I 1 RICHARD'S MARKET ' 1 V. .1 . ..-.■•■■ --- - -■ - ■■. ___, r, -3, • 1 1- 2 -te 4 —. i : — t ■ 1 4 x fif t 41 t•.1 0 , - • 4.2i _4 )— 11111 -4 & HI-7-7- 1. ' V% : ---3 d i cn c., 1 .;_. i J . ti U. Z (St i 2 • 0 1 1 g..■ _______ ,....,,,. n„) ._... n ; • i 0 12 at . 1+ ak:1 .."%jgt*:1071e4j ": 1 il . • ' o:_ 5, • . i i — 5 I — / 0-021 ,..1-• . I • . - 0 ti '2 fg Ir i I — o ,, NI 'I cr V\ SITE PLAN [6: . 411 0 a STAFF'S SUGGESTED SHRUBS & TREES N 5 Attachment 3 • MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Interviews for CDRB Membership DATE: July 9, 1990 INTRODUCTION On June 5, 1990, the Community Design Review Board interviewed Marie Robinson and Harry F. Voss for membership on the Board. Three other applicants had applied but did not appear. The Board moved to hold interviews again at the July 17 meeting to give the other three persons another opportunity to attend. Staff, however, was directed not to call them, but to wait for their contact to show their interest. These three have not inquired again about the vacancy. TECDRB • Attachments Applications for: 1. Marie Robinson 2. Harry F. Voss 111 . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION DATE: 5 -23- 9 NAME e W� �b�U'?ix. -a.w�J PHONE: (11) 73/•...)4$/5/ ADDRESS l 3/ E I J (W) 97 $304 e 1. How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? J/ 7 0. 2. Does your employment require travel or being away from the community which would make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes x No 3. On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? X Community Design Review Board Park & Recreation Commission Housing & Redevelopment Planning Commission • Authority Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 4. Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's,or Commission's scope of responsibilities? Ail to c ( caa bo r Ltti 5. List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: 4 6. Why would y u like to serve on this Board or Commission? ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: . M,% E c� \ C:7-4:11144--t CIAA4C. tinNu.kA:4A,J4. fyykk /// • • s galliiir : RI I 2 IMO CITY OF MAPLEWOOD • --- - -,J'' BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION • DATE:February 9. 1990 NAME Marry F_ Vnoa PHONE: (H)77Q -fi1n3 (W) Same as above ADDRESS2285 Nebraska Ave. East 55119 1. How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? 1S Mnrrh, 2. Does your employment require travel or being away from the community which would make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes y No 3. On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? Community Design Review Board Park & Recreation Commission Housing & Redevelopment X Planning Commission Authority Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 4. Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities? No. Not at the present time. 5. List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: Boy Scouts St. Paul Winter Carnival Explorer Scouts Imperial Order of Fire and Brimstone Blue Birds American Legion 6. Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission? I believe I can contribute something that will help Maplewood become even a better place to live. My 34 years a alMiimot in the Bell System and ■y current consultin give me a background that I feel will be • ADDITfONZLs��MMEN Se commission. I'll be looking forward to the oral interview. • •