HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-03-27 CDRB Packet i
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
March 27, 1990
7:00 P.M.
Maplewood Public Works Building
1902 E. County Road B
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes: March 6, 1990
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Unfinished Business
A. Chili's Restaurant and Maplewood South Shopping Center -
Southeast Corner of Southlawn Drive and Beam Avenue
B. Lillie Veterinary Clinic Site Plan Revision - Cope Avenue
and Atlantic Street
• 6. Design Review
7. Visitor Presentations
8. Board Presentations
9. Staff Presentations
A. Code Amendment - Building Cost to Determine Staff
Review of Construction Proposals.
10. Adjournment
•
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
• MARCH 6, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Moe called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Donald Moe Present
Tom Deans Present
Marvin Erickson Present
III Roger Anitzberger Present
Michael Holder Present
Daniel Molin Present
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. February 13, 1990
Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the minutes as
submitted.
Boardmember Anitzberger seconded Ayes- -Moe, Deans,
Erickson
Abstentions -- Hol
• Molin
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Boardmember Anitzberger moved approval of the agenda as
submitted.
Boardmember Holder seconded
Ayes - -all
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Building Elevation Revisions - Kids R Us Store Front at
Birch Run Station
Wasyl Hnatiw, project manager for Toys R Us (of which
Lavik, RSP
John Kids R Us is a subsidiary), and Jo were present at this
Architects and project architect,
meeting.
Mr. Lavik discussed the proposed store front for Kids R
Us, which does not match the existing front facade of
the shopping center.
The proposal included plans for a
flat canopy rather than a peak. Mr. Lavik said the
proposed canopy without the peak was redesigned by the
c enter's architect to give the center a more varied
appearance.
Community Design Review Board -2-
• Minutes 3 -6 -90
A board member objected to the proposed red, blue and
green striping since it is not a part of the balance of
the shopping center.
Mr. Nataw said he is in receipt of a letter from
Weatherford /Walker, developer of Birch Run Station,
stating their approval of this new proposal for the
Kids R Us front facade.
Boardmember Deans moved approval of the proposed
building facade change for Kids R Us at Birch Run
Station, subject to the following conditions:
1. All horizontal colored tile striping shall be
replaced with matching material to the existing
center scheme.
2. The revised plans shall be submitted to staff for
review and approval.
3. The materials shall comply in scope and intent
with the color and material design of the existing
• center.
4. Review and approval by the owner of Birch Run
Station.
Boardmember Holder seconded Ayes - -all
6. DESIGN REVIEW
a. Chili's Restaurant and Maplewood Retail Center -
Southeasterly Corner of Southlawn Drive and Beam Avenue
Dick Schreier, developer for the proposed retail
center, presented to the Board a new site plan which
moves the proposed building to the back of the property
and more of the parking area to the front of the
building. Mr. Schreier said this new site plan will
allow enough parking to meet code requirements and
would be a a more acceptable plan to the adjacent
property owners to the south. Mr. Schreier said
Ramsey County is in agreement with allowing the two
curb cuts on Beam Avenue. Mr. Schreier said he is
proposing to construct Chili's Restaurant as phase 1 of
the project and the retail center as phase 2.
Randy Engel, representing the architect for Chili's,
gave a presentation on traffic and parking concerns
building design for Chili's Restaurant.
Community Design Review Board -3-
• Y g
Minutes 3 -6 -90
Jim Faulkner of Falkner Construction, the project
contractor, discussed the proposed construction for
Chili's Restaurant.
Bill Potts, representing Chili's Restaurants, said
Chili's has an ongoing building maintenance program,
including a complete inside and outside painting policy
every three years.
Mary Lilidahl, 1815 Radatz Avenue, said she did not
want parking behind the building.
George Solnitzky of United Health Care Corporation,
representing Maplewood Share /Aspen Clinic, objected to
the setback proposed for the restaurant building,
proposed parking facilities, and the amount of
screening proposed for the trash enclosures.
Boardmember Deans said the site plan cannot be approved
by the Board until the revised site plan has been
approved by staff and revise landscaping as proposals
including fencing, screening, etc., and the exact
• building layout, dumpsters in the proper location,
lighting and building exterior plans all need to be
revised.
Mr. Schreier said he did not have a letter from Ramsey
County but only verbal approval of the two curb cuts.
Boardmember Deans moved tabling of plans for the retail
center at Southlawn and Beam Avenues for revision, to
be submitted for staff review and Board review. Areas
to be revised would include:
a. Exterior elevations of the strip center.
b. Site plan and layout showing adequate parking,
landscaping, signage, and lighting.
c. Written approval from Ramsey County approving the
two curb cuts on Beam Avenue.
d. Exterior building plans for Chili's are well done
and approved as is.
Boardmember Anitzberger seconded Ayes - -all
7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS
4
Community Design Review Board -4-
Minutes 3 -6 -90
9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
Staff advised the Board of the boards /commissions
recognition dinner scheduled for April 21, 1990.
10. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:49 p.m.
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Design Review and Sign Plan
LOCATION: Southlawn Drive and Beam Avenue
APPLICANT: Chili's, Inc. and Richard Schreier
OWNER: Richard Schreier
PROJECT TITLE: Maplewood South Shopping Center and Chili's
Restaurant
DATE: March 22, 1990
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
1. Chili's, Inc. is requesting approval of plans for a one - story,
5,995 - square -foot, 217 -seat Chili's Restaurant. The building
exterior would be red brick. Chili's would be attached to a
proposed retail strip - center on the south.
2. Richard Schreier, the property owner, is requesting approval
of the adjoining 24,540 - square -foot (based on Staff's
measurements of the building area on the site plan), one -story
retail center. The proposed strip- center would have an exterior
of brick on the north and part of the west elevations and brick
• and brick - pattern, scored concrete block on the east, south and
part of the west -end elevations. The brick would match the
red brick of Chili's. The brick - pattern, scored concrete block
would be painted gray.
3. The Comprehensive Sing Plan for Chili's and the retail center
consists of the following:
a. A 12- by 10 -foot pylon sign for the shopping center to
be placed at the corner;
b. A 60 foot pylon sign for Chili's at the proposed westerly
entrance drive along Beam Avenue;
c. Chili's wall signs include: one 45- square -foot sign above
the front entrance canopy and two 84- square -foot signs
on the west and east elevations.
d. Wall signage for the retail center would follow the
proposed criteria on page 22.
4. Chili's, Inc. must obtain a conditional use permit (CUP)
since code only permits restaurants in BC(M), Business
Commercial (Modified) districts by CUP. The Planning
Commission and City Council will consider this request.
BACKGROUND
Frontage Drive
1979: The City developed a concept plan (see page 13) for a common
driveway, connecting the parking lots of all the businesses on the
south side of Beam Avenue, between Southlawn Drive and White Bear
Avenue.
Proposed Site
5- 12 -86: The City Council approved a CUP for a Bonanza Restaurant
in conjunction with a strip center. This development was not
required to connect to the frontage drive south of Beam Avenue.
6- 13 -88: Council terminated the CUP for Bonanza Restaurant because
they decided not to build in this location.
3 -5 -90: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP
and recommended that the Review Board consider the following when
reviewing the site plan:
1. Take the retail space and move it as far back on the property
as possible, making only an emergency vehicle and service
lane behind the retail space, in that way pushing all of the
• parking into the front of the building creating a larger
buffer for the property owners in the rear.
2. Consider the adequacy of the parking spaces if reduced by the
amount requested in the variance, also reviewing the ratio of
employees to patrons which are indicated by the location of
the parking lots.
3 -6 -90: The Community Design Review Board approved the building
exterior for Chili's and tabled approval on the site plan and
building elevations for the proposed retail center so that revised
drawings can be submitted including:
1. Detailed exterior elevations of the strip center.
2. Site plan and layout showing adequate parking, landscaping,
signage and lighting.
3. Written approval from Ramsey County approving the two curb
cuts on Beam Avenue.
Share Clinic Site
8- 23 -83: The Community Design Review Board approved the Share
Clinic east of the proposed site. Conditions 2 and 3 required:
2
•
2. Reciprocal access easements allowing for the cross flow of
traffic between this site and the lots to the east shall be
submitted for the City Attorney's approval prior to the
issuance of a building permit for the structure.
3. If the reciprocal easements cannot be obtained, a temporary
curb cut may be considered by the City. Access is subject
to the City Engineer's approval.
The Share Clinic was not able to obtain the cross easements and
the curb cut was allowed. A drive was constructed to the west
property line, to be extended into Mr. Schreier's site when it
developed. The clinic will provide the easements if the
Council requires them of Mr. Schreier.
DISCUSSION (parking, frontage drive and ourb cuts, building design,
landscaping and Ramsey County curb cut approval)
Parking
It is worthwhile noting that there is the potential for a parking
shortage with this project. While observing the new Roseville
Chili's Restaurant, Staff counted 82 cars in their parking lot at
a "slower" time (1:30 p.m. on Saturday, February 17, 1990) and up
111 to 135 cars at "happy hour" (7:00 p.m. Friday, March 2, 1990.)
Maplewood code only requires 69 parking spaces for Chili's.
These figures are important to note because of two previously
approved businesses in this area that have generated a greater
parking demand than code anticipated. These are the former Best
Buy Store (presently Pier 1 Imports) and Merrill Lynch Real
Estate, whose visitors periodically overflow onto the Hirshfield's
parking lot when they have special sales meetings.
Frontage Drive and Curb Cut Deletion
This site would have the last section of the common frontage drive
that would connect it to Southlawn Drive. Its purpose is to
reduce the number of driveway openings onto Beam Avenue and allow
for better traffic circulation between the effected businesses.
Fewer curb cuts mean fewer traffic conflicts. The frontage drive
connection to Southlawn Drive will also improve access to
Mr. Schreier's Center and the Chili's Restaurant from the other
businesses on Beam Avenue and will reduce some of the traffic at
the Sherwin Williams intersection.
3
•
Connecting the parking lot to the frontage drive will also allow
for the elimination of the easterly curb cut, particularly if the
easterly drive is connected to the westerly parking lot as shown
on Staff's proposed site plan alternative on page 14. Without
this connection the west parking lot may become overly congested.
Customers who cannot find a convenient spot will probably exit
back onto Beam Avenue and go in the easterly drive, using Beam
Avenue as if it was a portion of the parking lot and, therefore,
creating more traffic conflicts on Beam Avenue. The City's
Transportation Plan, done by Barton Aschman, recommends a
centerline to centerline separation between drives on arterial
streets like Beam Avenue of 200 feet, with 150 feet as a minimum.
The proposed drives are 114 feet apart, centerline to centerline.
Building Design
Brick should be applied to the north, east and west sides of the
retail center, as well as that part facing northeast by the trash
enclosure, for better aesthetics on these more visible elevations
and for compatibility with the surrounding commercial development,
as required by code. The recessed east elevation of the retail
center and the two south elevations should be at least 50% brick
with the balance being the proposed brick - pattern, scored concrete
block. If Staff's alternative site plan is adopted, both end
elevations should be all brick. The brick band should be widened
• so that it touches the tops of the service doors for better
aesthetics when viewed from the homes to the south.
The parapet should also be continued all the way around the
building across the south elevation for consistency and better
aesthetics because this elevation would be visible from Southlawn
Drive and the adjacent residential properties. The Maplewood East
shopping center was required to raise the parapet on its rear
elevation for better aesthetics as viewed from Maplewood Heights
Park.
Only one trash dumpster area is proposed. This area would be
recessed between Chili's and the retail center facing east. The
screening gate would be constructed of solid wood.
Landscaping
The proposed six - foot -tall wooden screening fence and ten green -
ash trees along the south lot line would provide adequate
screening for the adjacent home owners. The green -ash proposed
along the two street frontages, however, should increased in
number to provide a tree spacing of 30 -feet on center. Four trees
should be added along the Beam Avenue frontag (two in front of
Chili's and two by the parking lot) an The inneachpif the
hean
landscape areas along Southlawn ot
should also be further developed to provide evergreen tree
screening along the east lot line to better screen the trash area.
4
Ramsey County Curb Cut Approval
The Ramsey County Traffic Engineer's office has stated that they
approved both proposed curb cuts on Beam Avenue on March 20, 1990.
Mr. Schreier has stated that he will have the County's approval in
writing at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
A. Approval of Chili's Restaurant and the Maplewood South Shopping
Center as shown on the site plan titled "Staff's Proposed Site
Plan Alternative" in the memorandum dated March 22, 1990,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does
not constitute approval of a building permit.
2. The trash dumpster shall be screened within an enclosure
with a 100% opaque wooden gate. The enclosure shall be a
color and material compatible with the building.
3. The wooden -fence screening units for the roof -top mechanical
equipment shall be installed if the parapet does not provide
sufficient screening when viewed from any direction. The
brick parapet shall be continued around onto the south
elevation of the building.
• 4. An erosion control plan, acceptable to the City Engineer,
shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit
for erosion control during construction.
5. Parking areas shall be striped in a double - stripe "hairpin"
design and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete
curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of
repair.
•
6. Employee parking spaces shall be posted as such.
7. If construction has not begun within two years of approval,
Board review shall be repeated.
8. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed
or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent
properties or roadways.
9. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed
due to construction of the site, that property shall be re-
stored and irons replaced by the applicant.
•
5
•
10. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the
City Engineer's approval.
11. The landscaping plan is approved for Chili's as shown on
attachment 11 of the report dated March 22, 1990, and as shown
on the plans for the retail center, but shall be revised for
Staff approval providing for:
a. Six additional green ash to increase tree spacing to
30 -feet on center. This would place two trees in front
of Chili's, two north of the main parking lot and two
along Southlawn Drive;
b. A row of evergreen trees along the east lot line to
provide additional screening for the trash area;
c. All overstory trees shall be at least 2 1/2 inch, B and B;
d. All green areas shall be sodded.
12. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly
maintained. All required plant materials that die shall be
replaced by the owner within one year.
13. Reflectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be
• provided.
14. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction
shall be restored and resodded.
15. Proper building addresses shall be installed, subject to the
approval of the Fire Marshal.
16. The signage plan is approved as submitted and described in
the memorandum dated March 22, 1990.
17. Reciprocal cross - easements shall be granted between the
owners of this site and the property to the east prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
18. Approval of a conditional use permit for Chili's by the
City Council.
19. The building exterior shall be continually and properly
maintained.
20. 'An inground sprinkling system shall be installed for all
landscaped areas.
6
.
21. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form
acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated
cost of any site improvements that are not completed by
occupancy. The applicant shall also provide staff with proper
documentation, to be approved by the City Attorney which
allows staff access onto the property to finish work that
may not be completed by occupancy.
B. If the Community Design Review Board does not approve Staff's
site plan alternative showing the separation of the retail
center and restaurant, Staff would recommend approval of the
proposed site plan date - stamped March 9, 1990, with the
stipulation remaining that the frontage drive connection still
be required. Staff would also recommend approval, subject to
all of the same conditions stated under recommendation A above.
1
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed the 23 surrounding property owners within 350 feet
for one as one ommentandt replies,
seven objected.
The one survey in favor came from the owners of the Merrill Lynch
building. They stated that "the parcel needs development, but
was under the impression that easement over all lots south of
Beam would be extended to Southlawn Avenue."
Six of the letters objecting to this proposal are from surrounding
homes and one is from the Share Clinic (adjacent lot to the east).
The residents are primarily objecting to the bar and the resulting
potential for noise late at night from people talking in the
parking lot, car doors closing and engine noise. (Refer to the
letters on pages 15 through 19.)
The Share Clinic objects to the building location, the potential
use of their parking lot by Chili's and unscreened trash areas.
(Refer to their letter on page 20.)
i
8
REFERENCE
BITE DESCRIPTION
1. Site size: 3.5 acres
2. Existing Land Use: undeveloped
• SURROUNDING LAND USES
Northerly: Beam Avenue and the Movies of Maplewood
Southerly: Two double dwellings and three single dwellings
Easterly: Share Medical Clinic
Westerly: Southlawn Drive and undeveloped BC(M) zoned property
PLANNING
1. Land Use Plan designation: LSC, Limited Service Commercial
2. Zoning: BC(M)
PUBLIC WORKS
A traffic light will be installed at the intersection of the
Sherwin - William's drive and Beam Avenue this spring.
TECHILIS
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Frontage Drive Concept Plan
5. Staff's Proposed Site Plan Alternative
6. Survey replies from neighbors (five)
7. Letter from United Health Care Corporation (Share Clinic
owner) dated February 5 1990
8. Shopping Center Sign Criteria
9. Retail Center Pylon Sign
'10. Chili's Pylon Sign
11. Chili's Landscaping Proposal
12. Maplewood Retail Center and Chili's building elevations
date stamped March 9, 1990 (separate attachment)
9
•
Interchange • • Interchange
- I • _ iii0rIncl rR oal arlerlal 004
Vadnsls Haight* ; 1 - ` • I (SC r , �
'major r
1 iLi YW....!i astaeawatral a�raoaaaaaasa lstaaaaa
.� /��� Co. R. D colleelor
I �.
• BW ' s ' • y '
1 , �lo / Rs
.. ma,or 1 r s 1 ._._. , =; s • a
• ' L • —...1 'rl' u / us C •
ma or c _ % /: / /1 ■� .��
)--- - ti ,
t . �p /t.- /9am.j i 1 .
I ' ---- -� //11
- ertal
'b 11 Q�] OR
. e
1 0 / — 4" 1 , 1 - -- OS
C o . Rd. C 3 ' •• ` : j . - i - — a.leriat - - - ..• ° 4 � t
Illi _ .. »� SC R _ _ -..RL 4 ..
,:: — - S •
Wir
1 _ �•— p C• j . � 1�- j rO rsc
• pt. = p
-- LS
s-urs�.`o - - -+ �s a RL >�.. P t LSC Awe= aoaar
Major colt• l0�7 • ••'t. ' i
r '
' GOrv3li
u RL
�aasaaa qu eov • . sus as oaoaaaaEaa z Q RI
I ' BW • { _,-. M �...v =. :,;_ Ls •
4 it m • "ar� Q •. y,, -- �; I HIghiriy 3 , � I , , ry r � Aan • 1 // ( 1 • _ 1 , : — I nto
M 1 ; �:�t _e = - .r - irk 1, ! 1
c a w
u c : o s
u W • • •
C - o •
e •
to
• •
•
E t
1
1
f • HAZELWOOD
LAND USE PLAN N
• 10
Attachment 1 ■
[.°
/ •
j
•
/ Cy "s• 4 t .
1 C . i •
• 'e •� i i 0 v ••
• •
1 q • If e
s
•
o
Z + .;.. :r
P.% C
49 e
•
• w
a s J In n (z • • � � ' � (6) I i
I • Doe an !•! •f 1•a — kJ' r n.ft • • t• ! r . . •
f el
4 N Oq r. �t•NIr. 4 — i
Z' 3 w • D• : • •7• •
C • ' w•1 •••t.• • •• •r e• ~ w
OS
n oa N C s. "P •3> . - � ■ RN% * 4 R' } Z . r fi
E . 16:1‘. i• , ' ,•1•:4 . 1 a, ` , ", ' 1!--;L : .$ 1 ?: : :‘: 1 y fx y ••
:V -ilt '
On w l7� . (S r a \ rt �� i 11.,..: PO..�.„0,.a'1 "'�c•tfr Fe �•t,JO -' I.ei•a 1fY • 421116. „ ii
. 120) •'0 ` r f lc,: v to' pa ite 0.1) @ . r .3• as.
• 2 15 ff .u•• (1•) to 07) ti Us) s••. ,#I. i 1
F 1 r (ISl . !4•s f4.s . 14M 8 ; . ' (• / - (L)1 = ), .ip•e. (K 0 .•f
.it+• . •41,..• 1 • ® Melt t (141
• i■■ RA ••••■ 1••etl)
•1- •1• If• w - - fl •J - 411 ' ia 3 rR NI - M• N• _ 1t0 1•e tee
1 • r,, a (•1) .f1r •r ,fa . f• !f ► , , .••N •, • �.7/f•T. .•••a •NY /1•• .ff■i. .•t••. K•a• aeet. .j
• !• ' 1 •
Ns1 � (LSl s (y►� • (6 1 al) ' c 6 0 rttl 4 (e4)
• (Z3 .: � pl i
of � �'' (y : 1!t! q' 4 2 e a it e u ko1 sy .. is ,
ih
s t :..L�� ,•:1 r t1•••
.0 • S = Share Clinic••' . P 'U D . ; •
H = Hirshfield's
• LVV�wf
SW = Sherwin Williams
■
ii
r
Property Line /Zoning Map
1 P Attachment 2 j c
t `_
. .
, .
•
• - -- — ---
I ..
. .. ..
KW NOM .. .. ...■—...........
T .
woo owe ....,-----
. ), .....,,il \ .1I f
I hi _
iill i I 111111=1. I
.11
,„,--lial irsi I . I/ 1 NE
.. 1 ....
•
1 4 I I
I I . .
I .
. ‘ ciass
7 Mit.••••••••■LST 1
1 : '
/OW 1 I
. 1 .
M I
11 1 1 • n
H
g - -- 4 7t 41*, P : I
1-?........; . .
1 -..................
SR/0m; ow .0'4 1 1 iiiv a
I! . •-■
I . I
• . /1.1 11111111111.1!..i•'"illil
1
51 2:11! r 11 I !l - el
MI
— .411•••••• •••••• we
4 .r.•••••• orow•M• 1 I I 1 I I I a
I i :
C . .; 1. . • •
WRIERINNIMI . IffiEMININNIEw
— 417.00*
— --- - —
1 wr 4 qv. own.. •■•••••••) .
•
.. • •
■•00
t .
SITE PLAN
12
Attachment 3 0,-----N
N
1‘. ,
'3AV 8 31IHM
( 4 •
40 . .
■ •
• . r (213 RS e) : .... .
•
•
_ • =
earl
• .• —. • .•.: V OW _ — WM ... • ••• •• OW • • ••••••■•• • CO
OW I •
am
egC IN.
erns .
law ma MD
• • • ! = :1116,11:61 I DC
L ............::} 1 • it. I s gag
• ' Zy Z • • • 49 • _ _ _ _ - i . .. — - -•- 3
ll
°C u .4.720
•
cea
0 10
•
•
1 dm
Li
• — . 0 .• at
I 111 / •• = .'• MI h% 1 • 1 � • .. d •
• I • • • .: ••• 1111 •••• Q Q cS ��.
• 1 • ii• • m
'• r. •
• •
• • !_ ••• _ _ III _ • • •
•
� •
■
am am 0
• Z • • ••• •
•
—
• •
• 8115= • • -r---. NAkif II i.►. i ;;) S Attachment 4
•
•
: ,I 1
• .
I WA NW
M gym'
i .€14. .111.1 • s .^.* v
=' L H L$ I I 71 I I 11111111a l'rt r 1 '—
I ma • � I i i III .11 L ' , ' % %'! % / s
e.,...,........... ... I -
ill " i -
al'
!i1LL Ij 1 1---F47::::::4:,
1 i, .
•
. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11
- MI) L---1
M
A
A 5,6o05.3:61. 1
il
-I inr ......w (
.......�..._•. 3 ; 41 —
i' ! , ,-.
. , k • _ 1 ,__,I 1 ._._, 1 1 1. . s 1
f
- .r..... ..... - 417.00' .« ..w........ -
/169 1:44;9„. S ,ec.S
I f
' Staff's Proposed Site Plan
• Alternative
N
14 Attachment 5
•
'''°`' "'""`'°` + '''
I am in'' favor of " this, proposal becaus • :; ! : ' I have no . comment. ••11 ? i . /'••� .r -I . object to this proposal because .c. e_
', ' '•'r': " • If you object, describe below or draw on the enclosed map
..., ';..:•!:: : ''.::.i . =.. , '' "t any changes that would make this project acceptable. If no
• _ .'.changes would make it• acceptable, how should this property
. • - '::be developed?
•` (projectsChili's) - Use reverse side it more room is needed.
.. ',...:.....-..• . 1 -.,.. ,, , • •
_ j
• f Equal Opportunity Employer Z •
•
. • ..•'. .1::=P_ ...•‘•;...-o...4...t..or..- ep...e... .4.4 ,,..4 = , det. ..4... 1...
- ..4....1..... =04.. #•••,-
C-4: ". 11 -" - orr-a"—d......‘,..e. pr.t...0-14/-....c. ge.
•
V •' C�o. -oGc. •..'L' e,.e� mss... n,_ /L♦ a= e.4.- ..,Z
/a...d.4., t/ .,,v (mot _t...g- •,.....�.. -
� ' ' ", ....z.—.4.- ...,..................1.. tee_ 6- ;c2= , ( 7/ .4.4.- csj ::::: A-40-•-u-e..„
�.. W _ALA., 0—...w�
i ficx- - - , ...- 0 - , -1,__ 0-4.4.r-n"..44S- 4003.0"."....
i L.,_, ,. . "0,
•
.
. .
.. .
,,:z.".............:1■4,... • ��
. . - 17 7s z144L
. •
i .
- - - . - ... _ 15 Attachment 6
:t-• _I am in favor of this proposal becaus
,...
•....•
.
I have no comment. wt*
— I object o this pr posal because _i l ca A < e c n k d '.-:..I Ls
•. -('tiP t.? r4 c,4 44,4 a d G t •tt
''• If you object, describe below or draw on the enclosed map
iii, • any changes that would make this project acceptable. If no
changes would make it acceptabl , how show d t1} property
be developed? .Awr'wQJi Xre c t •cct " U. - fir . 0 ,t Qy
(Project: Chili's) Use reverse side if more room is needed.
A , I.%
�� ' - r� � /Wy Equal Opportunity Erp u�•rr ;
1 - 1= . . c..1V; je.rtsj . 0 p 4 ..1} 1 . 1 -A- 5104 "" ). %,1 :t ‘s c . ..1 11 r ) 4
.: •tri1/44:‘rj 7, 11, A ,.; dAyr ".....,..42.....e.:41) Ar
�
.3 . ;70t.. e „.(2.91 2 A
i 96 p.441 / LAI-Q-2° c .
. cy,),,... AA,t.aP 7
•.? A) Cp.) C.
� (' /itp.—..... ,_41c=3{) .0—J
,� �
,R,
c
4L1*%2243 °L 0 . •
(.0
P .-000-4.0- .,� crt.A..*QQ,c,-,,
t
• . g
.. ,,r1.—tc,...t.: ' Tim & Vanchulee Scluenke
• 1835 Radatz Ave. E.
? Maplewood. MN 55109
4 :6.;.. •
10 • —
•
4 i
1•;
t . J ai . o f v4i1ti iA °A ut 1 we n. a4.16i 4geu
_ C o Ck.a-nr��o ti C.Jtid w.¢ a.o.4. &Luz eita - G.k. '.J kt Lou X n ecam
liphuiza41 -huh -- w-c. c& a'ici t�.J- 0 ,...e4 — &ow Quit 59tek
• ft. ka-d lam leu.". ti, %. _ ; 0,1 �ti( WAAL tom, em,y ice.
i % , ■ A kIL ( b&¢.r :ac4! off - a It.a
atii: ao-eAA., kakee Rask t"eduLis.A.4 Po --ttolvt,64 itudsp.se
� acA,t .eS, ` c v a4 S ko„...e lice.. x n.o Niz ,
Now c QA. VW- s,..A.1 - v.- i u j- L %La) .€4C No i- G.
1 6 '`• l-' b
`gyp ri� t 1506e14 d . IA ham 6¢.0 ik.
V wr\c. ham n o &•tip P lQ,.4sJ-Z aL J- :; I
. NA:14j CAM, Meivt 6.6-1Q1 1/4.Ukcd ,k1c,..11-s-s 41vAk Nct,J. .1--%
1 t'W 1 - 0 -4/ \324c4 tiii
kti 8- CU- -krtilt I\U 4\11 MO1\ -- Al i ) 9 - T
Ik4. J l ems. aid► 4b�i ' 0 . tit o w 1`0.1 41-u
04 o icade..„ & vusd- rvsLo j,% aLwciL . W Q i \al4._ (-0
- 010 °Lb 0.- eft-i aw‘d. 06 iva.1 °We/ 4-6 L2 4.0.C.L1
4'l . 1 IA i4t.14v3 . •-.al ask c - tu,:,,c 0`4 -t`a.t J_ALLvkAit .,
-( ' 4- gaa,(o eviLd- LiAth lot a. kiti
entk t kt1j4°' t`'` . Y .
5..(AAti ilki ,„„., ji
Cats Ai/
i t. 4.,11 4i.iti kw')
�Plca. %( 1
„ &
evur 1/4'isLat-Lkoc( " 4 -`,. -4411 / 1 • -- -10-.t4_, htv-
44,_ i jaQ.4 awc jto,k -1-k (;l4 -,tsy,-
lo .
. . .
44, ?
. ..:. .
b l ow i41..u.c." ruare.. liretc. 1 itoi s -e. / pol 0 •
1 ait „a fri, u ,t.t.c..-(.4.$ (L e... -e Lt.7 (c47 ti.....e.d cili) es geo.g
1
. a rect. Reek 11
•:
Riga S e k 0 5 t) ..1_17 Otc. N
I. l 7-'ra."PievC- tt 5( vtrj /4-t- St
P C) CACLe-- '/Z ewo a 14 - ( / 6c)44
_ t
I 8 (IA. r i4--Ve Vuae-- NA.PerS e-C-I le)" Li L e* rit- ( g fbilk
. , r i
I GO it Oa c3 el worse rr N aa-Gc,/ -i•-et t 7 e c. _
.4_ v ,6„ g i ft e . c - s - f h ulbh he_re_
i 46 e4te ftx, g I Ad
•.. WLI e_apt 6 ‘ oe. O sb"e- d'/Zaf
, ..
5 Lett A. 114416 e A•C' aralfet
.1 .
m- 744-ts resicge.... c .4 17(4.-re
/
.. .." ILl Lcorry 7 4,-- ',4..os e a ro a-a • . 6
1 e
Q.) , its
t i
otexk e4. V 4-(s area (t;c:r desfr eel% 4.:44( . 7el..c y .
a. r e_ 5 7 c /1: 1,01/i ttz rei )4 i se.g per rb e _s
■.) a c ‘.. t-t.- 9 i 4.-Le Li. 1,., 7.,
A
• c---5nr_61L t 2)
I
1
18
. .
. .
. .- .
.. . . . . .
•
• •• • •I am in favor of this proposal because •
.
:ti , • • - ' - ' , ; �;=.• c ; �9.: ,i- : + ► f .
. v I' _: have'no:'comment.•: •. :•'..,•: L
':. ;:;s _ � _ 1 ob e t •to'this proposal ke }.! ..44- t it
� i i � . .. Ct 4 .,;,.. L ./iALt. 7 -�•4 .1/i/ "f•V• . .n 71 - Lc ( C. 0.c.t.•.
'' w;, , , ; • Nk If -you object, describ bslow oraraw on the enclosed map
';- 4 ±t%- : any• changes that would make this project acceptable. If no
., :'. changes would make acceptable, this • i.1. f •�-� b developed ? a. ' it aceptable, how shou s property
•
' :.. r ..- •., ..:;,...•;14.S.f.i: .• ...A/Orr . ‘014.4■+%1 0'1%) SF 4.. C Zetot.A.. c_.:1� `;.;;,r• P r o • ect li's). •••.Us reverse si 's- needed. • — •
. ........: .i..11:;tf t:.4, 0. • ir • ....‘• 3•• ..b.,....... ..
1...,:i;-.i.,...1c.:4:...4...... .1 • • !, q. • adt .... •
• 1 : '?.��SNt:% .. •.�'��t.4.w caw —a,.
. • 4 t-. ....1-0--t 7 '77.--e—c..--v-- �I h 11 ! •
• if : : ' ... , , Te...4.sf
•
• : i . O. : :: , .,. . •. .. CL". 377 'LA-4:—
.. k+1•;:* '- .i•. :.
rho., .
r .e ..„).* z...c.".4.4_,-, .
' ..2 " 1 • . .... . .:. . ... - '' . • .. • .
•
•
t J.'ei * sfe,ta IC re*
' . - .
• .
6..
. • ...
. . . . . ..
r •.i.
. • .
i .,.. ......,..:• .. ..:,• . •. :..
• et• •..
. •....••••• .....• ....•••. .• ..•:.
t• •.?
.._ . _____. • ...... .
. .• • 19 ..
•
1 % 1 1.kr • 4 .4.
FEB 7 Leo
United HealthCare Corporation
February 5, 1990
•
Mr. Geoff Olson, AICP
Director of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Mr. Olson:
In response to your survey on the application the City has
received to develop property and issue conditional use permit to
contract a Chili's restaurant location adjacent to
g opinions: the
Maplewood Share /Aspen Clinic, I s
1. The site plan did not clearly show the location of the
Chili's building, but it appears to indicate that the •
building location could have a different set back than
the Share Clinic building. This would obstruct the
view of the Clinic from patients or potential patients
traveling east along Beane Avenue. This would not be
acceptable to Share.
2. The location of Chili's on the site, with the two
entrances and exits off Beane Avenue and the layout of
the parking could stimulate the use of Share's parking
facilities rather than having to park and walk any
distance in the parking lot.
There are only 183 parking stalls for the entire
project, Chili's and the retail shopping
During the busy season, usually during holidays, the
lot will be full and potentially some what diminished .
in capacity, due to snow buildup and the likelihood of
the "Projects" customers utilising Share parkinu
possible. A site plan in relations to the Share
property would be helpful.
•
9900 Bien Road East
PQ. Boos 1459
Minneapolis, Minnesota 5544048001
(612) 9364300
• 20 Attachment 7
Page 2
February 5, 1990
3. Since the proposed location of the rubbish /trash
receptacles were not clearly identified on the
elevation drawings and site plan, I'm making the
assumption it is the southeast corner of the building
facing the clinic. This would be in the site line for
patients, doctors and nurses viewing from the windows
on the west side of the clinic. Typically, this is an
unkept area even in the best of facilities. Should the
location continue to remain, Share would prefer not
only a fully secured and constructed building screening
walls but also bermed with mature (10' + +) evergreen
trees planted to screen the area and any unsightly area
along the east walk of Chili's and the shopping center.
It would be helpful if I could have more time to review a full
model or site drawing of the site plan and building in retrospect
to the Share site and building. I have taken a visual walk
through, however, this can be deceiving. I would appreciate
•
further opportunity to discuss these matters.
•
Sincerely, •
t':;:-C-olnitz a
Director of Support Services
cc: Pam Shaw
Share File
•
•
21
-
l7vA
EXHIBIT "C" t 1 5 1990
SIGN CRITERIA
• MAPLEWOOD SOUTH ``
1. Signs shall be composed of individual letters and shall be no
more than thirty six (36) inches in height and shall be attached
to a raceway. Lettering is not restricted to any particular
style.
2. Signs shall be internally illuminated.
3. Signs may have one (1) line of copy above another line but the
total height shall not exceed thirty six (36) inches.
4. There are no restrictions as to color.
5. A sign shall not cover more than eighty percent (80 %) of the
linear distance of the store front to which it is attached.
However, all signs shall be set in at least eighteen (18) inches
from the borders of the Tenant's lease area. Signs must be
centered in front of each store.
6. Logos may be used in the allocated sign area but are subject to
the size limitation. Logos may be used on the store front by
the door but shall not exceed four feet by four feet in size.
there shall be no more than one (1) logo per tenant frontage.
•
Attachment 8
22
3 _1
. 1(
•
1 .MAPLEWOOD • IV RI e' K
RETAIL P
•
II
ILMIGNist 09,44.
or
• ♦ P".+ 1)",rC.ta.
•
11
1
Aim PYLON
- - - jie-M : • - :... .
•
•
23 Attachment 9
LIAR -21 -90 WED 12:55 BUETOW AND ASSOCIATES FAX NO. 6124832574 P.03
•
• .
•
•
. . . t ....... ,
....., ,
...,......,
..., ,t. 1 • 1
1,‘: 4 m irth SOW 11 i
- _ =s= — — n •
, ...„ . C .19Pl k GRILL & B ; - .._ .�.
. :
r ,X At
• r . , .
A f
41‘- w �.�. •f•N vita 4 4
1
. • ►
. 'pti 1 • I '
• . . . . . f
Mk
w
HN ��t 24 3 :D to 60 51 P'(LOP' Attachment 10
r • a • N
•
_ tnr ^=► • ' r_i.._ I • -`t •4,,••• `.' •, . • - - . •�
1 I Ta P5 . rs o fit el rlf 94r! '
•
:II r j � l i -I /1► : _ 1. p1 r 1
�•
' 'tk,............„,..4) . 1 .1 ! -.. , . „ •---- - -- • ;41 I j , /. -ff ..4 , // /. t-- Pro • . • f = • iv- 4 •� . . , / / /i, /// , / , ' P C r :
PS--- - : f / /. P 6
i _ 0 „ I 1 �. i, ',. , .' . %' ` • ' ,,/ /, /.' 1% I 13 =� 1 __�!•�'._., a' :' • 1_ ._-44- 1E•.„ < .,. .. - - •
P. 1 • i ••! � d 1 :1 •
C "2 . � ° �
Pc 4. }-•
• x , 1I RESTAURANT . • • 1 '
•
' St- -s.• r• •./' 1.-, f
P) , _•
t . , .;
. 1 " %.', ., / e t — Pjr 10
- t 1 t - • / i P6 tit
'9 ' 1' ! ' , • ' —' p
1 !1 1 • . . ,; • . ; N. y
: .,' 1 L . - ... . ,... . : , .::: ,.../. -,.... :, i /' .1
frr i /. '�. ■ •
• 7 • T1 1 - " • - ..,- re.•:,,. + . ! i
1 •
a -...
i j = -� • ' yd • .
-: •
• ! ? --
1 P I ' 2. ► rtatit s t P+ t of ``?•.) I
cod.ioty.1.. - os +�+ I I 1 �,,wo atir
tt 1 alo ►pY ca,1 t.rFp r1Pf+�r 'f►+�rn► ou4I I
1 ut
4 te•cf ftro -ro: 'cair* • 1 F;. 3 code* Mrs*. 2� S�NI N
T. s 00104 rw.ic cue 1o) s�� u+>! �rn
I . . 1 •••`4 taw► 1 f , 2 rUFR.a LOP - Pq 46 ivA will le •
1
•
Chili landscaping
25 N
J
Attachment 11
MEMORAND
f planner
• City Manager Associate
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate
Revision
T0: Avenue an d Atlanti Street
FROM: Conditional Use S UBJECT: Cope A °ration
LOCATION: Con/Spec ec ► Jr•
Co
AP PLICANT: John Veterinary Clinic
OWNER: TITLE: Lilli 1990
DATE: March 21,
INTRODUCTION the site plan for
revise re5 revision of the
approval toe raga
is requesting This chang
The applicant Clinic.
the Lillie. Veterinary
use permit.
conditional of the building
osed changes are Wort that
proposed h an area
Tile Prop spaces previously p easte lot line in north of the
be e p to the The area
1. The park clo expansio
would be rel ocated lot area.
for arking-
building ding would b left as green f to 2,382
build from 2,684 square
would be reduced would be omitted.
The buil the basement trees previously
2 ' square feet, and Three be moved to
• been revised• would
plan has the building page 5.)
The landscape at and southeast ° (Refer 3 • pr e noei'dth side of t building •
the CL1P
of this
appr date - s tamped
BACR3RO Cou ncil ge toed a site plan
11 -1 Threquired "adherenc •
89:
Condition ?5e 1989•n
September allowing ,a more
the PrOpertY b6 ill meeting all
The
DISCUSSI will impro w hile
T h e proposed revisio area north of the building
spacious c s
yard
parking O of the
age � revising Condition underlined
RECOMMEND
ead as follows additions are
the permit to resoluti ' Approval of use p out) = er 25,
conditional cro ssed s t a mped Sept d be
1. and deletions are lane date-stamp v
e v i g ed site plan, es m
to the 1990. inor
1• A dtie1e Ma=ah 15. 1990• evelo m
1989• of Communit
ireator
j
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan reduction
4. Applicant's letter dated March 14, 1990
5. Resolution
6. Revised plans date - stamped March 15, 1990
2
: ._.y._ ..
1 .
.
• •
• •`o- v _i
. • • ` ..
o
O • •
..
..
•
O •
• E E
• E 7m.. - J ilirr: a�
� a f wr cha p a II 1 1_ .kl] 11 - BW ' I tl
1
�� � , OjID Ipat r sr • 1�
44 , ; :, , IVO •s ss47i 1 . yes �bsl•r
.. 0 tI r •
ri Mi 71 . la R 1.:±4 ..11 - kg2-----
tQ M . I — XR - ^}ssa s / f ' —
'1.4 1 1-!' 1 ' - to
f -- ■ /7 . ' im:o
° w• rte` -. 'C.i = D 'IA ? C1 _ - 7/ % 1 0
1'+ ° 4 ■� �i
_ S ; :: � lL_�
min 4 t�
•s!'� . r.r+t i • :M; 1 -4 � t� ,- ' 1: = 11\ rarlarI.I L:_..cr
• „ � • r i ` _•Fr • al Are_ A = Fig 3 1 1. — � � �• � I i _ -
I� � ( El-,:t �Z = _ — • J L
t 1 ii li . - 7;1 1- ■ ‘....1 —
"
. "��.- :•Ora • �'.- -•
t e • s
• • • O
C =
W •
m
t
•
41 { , . • SHERWOOD GLEN
LAND USE PLAN N
3 Attachment 1
i
in- - __, vz_.0 ___ _______.._ -fr. .r.e..M1 - - ..,4_
0.5560 ee v
a< 4 .1506C• I, a
A.
.
(5)
01.9400 y ) vv ,
g _ 4.09 ass.. ( 6I � .
r T '1 .D1• ... . ... -- • Agates. • a0 •1+141* .i.i►M t a
V . los .
- _i_____F M a �
.4 41p.- 8 Vs. ob.__ j .....
on 1 MAPLE R ACQUE e
« u 0 n g • I. AND FITNESS CLUB . •
• 17 ' x . ,......• —+1 I 18 gel - 3 • - 0 - I f •
~o i to 7 f4� •� ): I . I.44oa Q /
24 2 E •
4.a: ✓ , ; 1 (.) ]U S' Cy? (7) • Po
6Ai, .04: •♦ I � • p , NK
lac Y it t
t aa4IG . >x..a« ate • " ,n "_ .. — _ ' ;b . Is
1 HANDY e► „ ::.> �
1� b HITCH - i . o> I:.•. • b • its1>•^to'v. :life ; 130; tit % • ..
e 4.O• POS a, . t
1 �4 ,�.v PRO ...
�i) t LILLIE VET . .. 1 1 • ; • 0
> :.• . 1 L I • ... . M 1.
K 11 : CLINIC at: MAOL UNO DENTAL CLINIC 1;P
.: ,.,•
1233 ] ei : Y Y. 2 : ,. f .i . I • . . . .1 �T+41t7 7s t E. # • i lit tz 1st!! viAgottat is II a pi a , . in al al ius is a 1 ) 1. I I• T(. ;il•- i) - °!s' 1
4o ao •. 14,• i i s 1 ;6 n s • • 'i8 , '" it, Iol I f r)1 � I f� :) 1 I 1
30 I.ssr 1 #.0 t 1 110 1 1 ( I I. �� 1 i 1 sL1.:11t 1 :� 1 �1 (ts so i L,_
� .. I 17 le j q 1:. 1 , :4 s i :..:� 1 e i as•1 , 4 112.21126011 12 168;1 x761 1$821 9 4 •
u
..r . so
• 1 1, :�S141b sll 1• Is11: u Vie e �1 11' I I r IS � �a ' l4; : 1 11 � 61 I ) I a 16,) I , e)I 1 (,)1 1 66 )1 1 (e) l • 54. 1 • • 1 I • Ifs 1 • !MI » 1(2) i.. :
s U .� 3'1
LARK •1- 1a11'11` Ave y E.
) N
40 00 70 I ,s 1 ,:r , s to I 1 ' 3 1 ' �) w)�' 1
• • i6 .1 �' I * 160 i94�1 • e
tm o ,...1 �:. T I
" IC1 I :o s I:: 1 4 , s 1:e. ,�-- Ms, 1 .41 . i ( I I t ill
; 1) _ 1J0'Wog ,� pi ' s3 Le � pco • 1 " IJ t I _1 �o� n 11 --�—
L "1 Z _�' _ 1 I v► � ,1 •( •� ~i• 7 � i 4 t'J _ '� 1= � ° I
w )1 ' ,j�,�� i 5 4 S t '11w .Is -1 IR Is . 1: 1� 1 1 i I i , I '
n µ1 / 1I I '� I I te ... U� .
t. " 4/ 1m , ess) •6.11 .� ... 11 r
• PROPERTY LINE . / ZONING MAP
4 0'
;
N
• 51 Attachment 2 `__ _
•
•
•
f rII % S
�,6 • ice!
°0,. y bOo� -7c o r • .. - T,^�e. off V P?! .r /
N .. W I r � 39
{ ��$�SF 1 , ` APPROVED SITE PLAN •
36-0 1. . / \ _osa _ � ��TTii
d' . - --
O' ' �� O
v rA e alsi a • 4
i 14
• e—e_28
• f�. t x -- r
\ A 1
nom► O rr /
—
i t PROPOSED REVISION
1 IN 9
z O / \ 11 •t
(� rza Y PREVIOUS TREE LOCATIONS
D i • I O. 0 NEW TREE LOCATIONS
I I . er..�.e i►
I I bob Inv
SA-7-Iteekript ••• - -
.N. WEST
4
r SITE PLAINS
5 Attachment 3 N
t
i
- _.._..A .,_
1
• = CON/SPEC
1809 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE
STILLWATER, MN 55082
(612) 430-1500
FAX (612) 430 -1505
March 14, 1990
Mr. Tom Eckstrand
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55119
Re: Lillie Veterinary
Dear Tom:
• Enclosed please find five copies of the revised Ullie Veterinary Clinic plans.
We have made a couple of changes, due to the cost being too high on the
project. First, you will note that the basement has been eliminated. We have
also made the building smaller by 302 s.f. The materials we had proposed
originally for the exterior elevation are still the same. Lastly, you will note that
we have eliminated the parking in the front of the building and shifted it to the
east side.
Please confirm our city council date of March 26, 1990. It is important that we
are on the agenda so that our construction start of April 2, 1990 can be met.
Sincerely,
Scott M. Nettell
Project Manager
SMN /bah
Enc.
•
6 Attachment 4
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, John Lillie, Jr. initiated a conditional use permit
for a veterinary clinic at the following- described property:
That part of Block 13 and the vacated street and the vacated
alley in said Biock 13, Clifton Addition, according to the
plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the
County Recorder, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as
follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Block
13; thence north 0 degrees 44 minutes east, along the east
line of Atlantic Street, a distance of 277.04 feet to the
southwesterly line of proposed street; thence south 60
degrees 46 minutes east, along said southwesterly line, a
distance of 398.26 feet to the west line of the east 10 feet
of Lot 7, said Block 13, Clifton Addition; thence south 0
degrees 44 minutes west, a distance of 82.53 feet to the
south line of said Block 13; thence west 350 feet to the
point of beginning, excepting therefrom the following
described parcel of land:
That part of Block 13 and the vacated alley in said Block
13, Clifton Addition, according to the plat thereof, on file
and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Ramsey
County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the
• southwest corner of said Block 13; thence north 0 degrees 44
minutes east, along the east line of Atlantic Street; a
distance of 277.04 feet to the southwesterly line of
proposed street; thence south 60 degrees 46 minutes east,
along said southwesterly line, a distance of 228.09 feet to
the point of beginning of the parcel of land to be
described; thence continuing along said southwesterly line,
a distance of 170.00 feet to the west line of the east 10
feet of Lot 7, said Block 13, Clifton Addition; thence south
0 degrees 44 minutes west, a distance of 82.53 feet to the
south line of said Block 13; thence west, a distance of
210.00 feet; thence north, at right angles to said south
line of Biock 13, a distance of 53.78 feet; thence north 29
degrees 14 minutes 24 seconds east, a distance of 128.16
feet to the point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use
permit is as follows:
1. This conditional use permit was approved by the
Maplewood City Council on November 13, 1989. �.
2. The Maplewood City Couuncilsheld m apublic hearing to
consider a revision to permit on
, 1990. Notice thereof was published and
• mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said
hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and
present written statements. The Council also
7 Attachment 5
• considered reports and recommendations of the City
staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
THAT the above - described conditional use permit be approved on
the basis of the following findings -of -fact:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained,
constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned
character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process,
materials, equipment or methods of operation that would
be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or
cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water
or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other
nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic
. on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed
streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities
and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer
systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for
public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and
incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into
the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental
effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Adherence to the revised site plan, date - stamped March
15, 1990. Minor changes may be approved by the
Director of Community Development.
2. This permit shall be subject to review after one year
from the date of approval, based on the procedures in
City code.
8
3. There shall not be any outdoor kenneling of animals.
4. shall not
can noise inside
residential property
line.
Adopted this day of , 199 .
i
9