HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-02-13 CDRB Packet 4 AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
February, 13, 1990
7:00 P.M.
City Hall Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes: January 23, 1990
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Unfinished Business
A. Siding Colors - Southwinds Apartments, Beebe Road
6. Design Review
A. Building Addition - Church of St. Jerome,
380 E. Roselawn Avenue
B. Buildings 275, 264 and 261 (Parking Ramp) - 3M Center
7. Visitor Presentations
8. Board Presentations
9. Staff Presentations
10. Adjournment
•
1
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 23, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Moe called the meeting to order at 7 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Donald Moe Present
Tom Deans Present
Marvin Erickson Present
Roger Anitzberger Present
Michael Holder Present
Daniel Molin Present
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. January 9, 1990
Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the minutes of
January 9, 1990 as submitted.
Boardmember Holder seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans,
Erickson, Holder,
Molin
Abstentions- -
Anitzberger
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Boardmember Deans moved approval of the agenda as submitted.
Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes - -all
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
6. DESIGN REVIEW
a. Proposed Building - City and County Employees Credit
Union on Cope Avenue
Sheldon Sanborn, president of the credit union, and
Dave Campbell, architect for the project, were present
at the meeting. Secretary Ekstrand said Item 2. d. (1)
on page 2 of the staff report, regarding increasing the
stall dimension for the parking stalls south of the
building, could be deleted since all parking dimensions
will comply with code.
Community Design Review Board -2-
• Minutes 1 -23 -90
Mr. Sanborn said he did not want this proposed building
to have excessive landscape screening for security
reasons, but he was not opposed to the conditions in
the staff report regarding screening. Mr. Sanborn said
the building construction is proposed to be of an earth
tone brick with gray -blue trim and beige dryvit.
Secretary Ekstrand explained the condition of the staff
report regarding site security lighting and asked that
the lighting be directed away from the homes to the
south.
Boardmember Deans moved:
1. Adoption of the resolution approving a conditional
use permit for a building setback of 160 feet from
the adjacent residential district for Cope Avenue,
based on the findings required by code. Approval
is subject to adherence to the site plan date -
stamped January 9, 1990, and review by the City
Council after one year from the date of approval
based on the procedures in the City code.
• 2. Approval of plans date - stamped January 9, 1990,
for the City and County Employees Credit Union
building on Cope Avenue, subject to the following
conditions:
a. Approval of plans by the Community Design
Review Board does not constitute approval of
a building permit.
b. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in
screening enclosures with a 100% opaque
wooden gate and shall be a color and material
compatible with the building. Enclosures
shall be protected by concrete - filled steel
posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the
ground at the front corners of the structure.
If the enclosure is masonry, the protective
posts may be omitted.
c. Any exterior building or roof - mounted
equipment shall be decoratively screened and
hidden from view. Screening is subject to
Board approval.
d. The site plan shall be revised to include the
411 following parking lot changes:
Community Design Review Board -3-
1110 Minutes 1 -23 -90
(1) The parking stalls shall be striped in a
double - stripe, "hairpin" design.
(2) There shall be a 2.5 -foot bumper
overhang provided for the ten parking
spaces by the east lot line. This
overhang area shall be concrete or
crushed rock.
(3) Both curb cuts at Cope Avenue shall have
turning radii of ten feet.
e. Enter and exit signs shall be installed as
proposed. Directional signs for the drive -up
teller windows, stop signs, a handicap
parking sign and "employee only" parking
signs shall be installed. Stop signs shall
be the type to reflect headlight glare.
f. All bituminous areas shall have continuous
concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept
in a continual state of repair.
411 g. Site security lighting shall be provided and
shall be directed or shielded so not to cause
any undue glare onto adjacent properties or
roadways.
h. If any adjacent property is disturbed or
property irons removed due to construction of
the site, that property shall be restored and
irons replaced by the applicant.
i. Grading, erosion control, drainage and
utility plans shall be subject to the City
Engineer's approval.
j. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to
this construction shall be restored and
resodded.
k. Proper building addresses shall be installed,
subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal.
1. Signage is not part of this approval. Sign
proposals shall be approved by staff, unless
City Council or Review Board approval is
required.
•
Community Design Review Board -4-
Minutes 1 -23 -90
m. A sidewalk shall be installed along the front
property line and shall be designed and
constructed according to the specifications
of the City Engineer. The sidewalk must
taper to meet the driveway grade at all
driveway crossings.
n. The building exterior shall be continually
and properly maintained.
o. An in- ground sprinkling system shall be
installed for all landscaped areas.
p. The landscape plan shall be revised to
provide five six - foot -tall evergreen trees
along the front berm.
q. All required landscape areas shall be
continually and properly maintained.
r. All required plant materials that die shall
be replaced by the owner within one year.
• s. If construction has not begun within two
years of approval, Board review shall be
repeated.
t. The color scheme for the building shall be
submitted for staff review and approval prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
u. The applicant shall provide a monetary
guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in
the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of
any site improvements that are not completed
by occupancy. The applicant shall also
provide staff with property documentation, to
be approved by the City Attorney which allows
staff access onto the property to finish work
that may not be completed.
Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes - -all
b. Annual Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman
Boardmember Erickson nominated Don Moe as Chairman.
Boardmember Molin seconded Ayes - -all
110 Boardmember Holder nominated Tom Deans as Vice
Chairman.
Community Design Review Board -5-
0 Minutes 1 -23 -90
Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes - -all
c. Annual Report
Secretary Ekstrand presented the annual report. The
Board discussed the report and upcoming projects.
Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the Community
Design Review Board annual report.
Boardmember Molin seconded Ayes - -all
7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS
Boardmember Anitzberger reported on the January 22 City
Council meeting.
9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
10. ADJOURNMENT
• Meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
111
110 MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Building Siding Colors
LOCATION: Beebe Road
APPLICANT: Continental Development Corporation
PROJECT TITLE: Southwinds Apartments
DATE: February 6, 1990
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The applicant is requesting approval of the proposed siding colors
for the Southwinds Apartments on Beebe Road. The two siding
colors would be "colonial blue" and "autumn brown." All trim would
be white. The roof would have "nickel grey" shingles.
BACKGROUND
On November 28, 1989, the Community Design Review Board approved
the Southwinds Apartments. Condition 17 stated that "the building
exterior shall be revised for Design Review Board approval showing
that the exterior aluminum lap siding shall be two colors of earth
tones with white trim."
DISCUSSION
Staff will not have a recommendation until the siding samples and
colored elevations are presented for review. The applicant has
stated that he will bring these materials to the meeting.
TESOWINDS
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Building Elevations (separate attachment)
4110
1
■ • N
•
.. .
.. • .- .
. •
• " ' .
. - ...--.1' . i . I 1 t___.:.% • Ci--....L.1- 1-----,._... -- —. .„.,. .ri —
=.—
L.
— [ CrilITPITI HIM .1..11 I i. J
..: 7 ,..4. 7 7.7114. l i .x ... :: '....: s ii!.....7...fr..-11.-.11.7?-.11,--:=1: 711 ril'
--J'"" E.ffr. j .___ F -,A .....,___ , i ,;•; ; ,;,„,,,,,,„„
__,_...17_...7_741. • • 7 -=:......... 1- ." r IL-
.......-....„, r
..--
• --:
,-- ...L_._.7..D.u.
__„FL5
— -- _ ''' 1 -----; ,. 1:11
,---, r am
FSou7 Line --- • I C---- --..
.A.:m.2:7 ... ..--
: ,
_
ii • . • 1 ,______.
I 1 —
I 1..(' . • / V.4.4:41— 4 t.. •
- .6- \% 1 • L--
. ,;,---. i\ \_. •11.--
, I
- P . .„,.
• . 1 - ---,- -, ul
I;
1.7. 74 ___ _ _ c2 ." I o .... . - ' r It In tii:1; 1-•-■ set
:.
- i. ..imajor collector Iiii.
i.,.'1
S :......:...:, —,..: -• . ' . H - -- ..----14 - Li T ..:
M - . • 1 •
R .
,-,,,,, • - ! — 1
. • ,, _ - 1_ =
g # G
,.J
.—.. ./.... I .
7 t =
P • Tv -77 -7
r, k . , .......... ■ ....vie. = ■:-..-.• . RI. *E j i i
,, — - 1 —•,—., .., ,
" L " ---- -
I .... ' — . — Itips.i: 71 • — ,L,-, _ < 5 ,
..... 1 „.
.. I
. \i
. .
.::::•:.• . ra c
.- .
--....._...___1
- Ill I
- -- 0 • 11
major arterial Li-
.
. l 711 1 .‘,..1
' • OS
1SC F--,-- - i
—,. - —1.
' ..■. • I
r•••• 1 i
rn 1
— • ' C1J • 1
L . .../
"‘ a
r ...
‘
Hillside . O
NEIGHBORHOOD LtrilD USE PLA'il N
Op •
. Attachnent 1 .1
L
. •
go
r
n3 G (n • r
I - Y. r Z m
1817 ° e c
1 -- . Z U D)
i
// f 0 8 250
,� i� IG.�- 8 S
M �4�) I 9
\
N 060 \ r o
\ . , \ 11816 4 84\ � • z.. 1 %.w.� les ...
/ F Ise
\N )• oa`teeoa�6 III e Ni (42.? C5
, u) 0
Q
N � - Zow.EsnT. A2
7 AI V . .4.1. e
411, i - "
YYYY ��•. 10 - .- \ • Deer t8 C5%tt j 53 1 2 Air
147 ` �+ . 1 ; r •,]� eto) '4. ` .
1 >4 • I, N
1
i \ (t S)
R 3.t .ttie. ; 1.55aa. 2t.� •- "
r
' .88
7 oC 2 z•..L
05 . x ', 124 � ZG S 42 ' -
`V ; ,v 3.18 o e e.. -C. . �o
03
or ,Z. BSow' I ( 85 Tot AA W r
G •al o� ,e ..ia
• I 1 1 K .. GI 41 K •
") I 0 40 lE 4 - --
• 80 Z
•
1 - ( 43 ) L.
. • 3 i,
B4 .
) 0 (ii ) • w . 0 9 tk -.; (7" (iL) q)
CC
I tr :: L
290 01 .
1731 (42_1 �i�fe?`�2 ' It.. r.r, � 2- 37 •- /l
• . 9)
�i����■■ 3.82o.c_. . ° ') eal
• ^�
1721 - 29') p
ir 3 t ,,. P , `
° 391 T•,.1
1 i' ^.�� ' (,5s It •• o l
r L J EanT •\ ' ( 1s)"f
Q 17 1 1 - 17 g) a : I �'° " � ‘ ,a
o a • y .4
° d
r j DS w o _ S �_ '' C
(tt95_*Ir 13: . - o 1 701 - 07 10) \ \ fi t. � A O • - � _ • . ., - _ - 0037(72
w
3s.�1' --K - t"4 �— ,079.:41 (.7•93/ 24. -.,e"
• . • \ II ,1
/',• 3 • O - • 1 00 ., s ,t.
.O3 c
I o.. .50 o.e. O
� , n
0 ' N 12 11" 10 r.
•
Ig oio (s) - • 2135 f 1
88 I +t -
o „ .25 o.c.(4) o /
3/9.87 L o1° (3 j 6 � (44> I (40) (39) (38) `37)
, ' - - - - • " o .. I 121 t21 2
c ______.f _____^
- t N. 89 S446" . 2681.1 E� S;
e • ■
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
.[-
[ .
Attachment 2 N
•
■ . • . 1
iS il j 1 I z J
ii i . 1 ! III
� � � �s tiUI
• s s ii 1 1
i s
++� C 0 � - O \ 111Y1t
-. •
\ --o / `t A11diY
i.„._.,_-____I-w a
/
al ( 7 . _ t. - _ -® _
s ■
I . t' ! 7 1
-... , , t �
...1 ti,: a ; 1 • .
•• ♦ ♦� d
v e • .------j
•
li
• j r %%MP ■ ; / i
l
�/t _ 11 1 I
6 II I b. _ ' ■ u
,,,, +.w
• \ , I
O
•
W
r /
.
•
,
1i f , ,
, ,
....
,•.•. ; /
11.t 1 R ,
4 111 1 1 ./ 1 12i_ 5 @a tE . RR!
i II I seI s A /
0 Dv i /— /
avow Yn11M1/YYl •
. Attachment 3
410 MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Design Review
LOCATION: 380 E. Roselawn Avenue
APPLICANT /OWNER: Church of St. Jerome
PROJECT TITLE: Building Addition /Renovation
DATE: February 6, 1990
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
1. The applicant is requesting approval of addition /renovation
plans for the Church of St. Jerome. The proposal would remove
2,500 square feet of the existing church and replace it with
4,800 square feet of new structure. The net increase amounts
to 2,300 square feet.
2. The proposed addition would match the existing church. The
entrance on the west side of the building would be revised to
be handicap accessible, but the existing canopy on the west side
would not be altered.
3. The applicant is also requesting approval of a conditional use
permit to expand the church and a 1.8 -foot front setback
variance, because the addition would have a 28.2 -foot setback
M from the front lot line; code requires 30 feet. These two
requests will be considered by the Planning Commission and
City Council.
BACKGROUND
On therconditional0use the
permitnand them1.8-footrecommended approval
of setback
variance.
DISCUSSION
The proposed addition would be an attractive improvement due to
the replacement of the stucco portion of the church with brick and
stone to match the existing structure.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of plans date - stamped January 17, 1990, for the proposed
addition to The Church of St. Jerome at 380 E. Roselawn Avenue,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does
not constitute approval of a building permit.
410
2. Any outdoor trash dumpsters for the church shall be stored in
screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall
be a color and material compatible with the building.
Enclosures shall be protected by concrete - filled steel posts,
or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners
of the structure. If the enclosure is masonry, the protective
posts may be omitted.
3. Any exterior building or roof - mounted equipment shall be
decoratively screened and hidden from view. Screening is
subject to Board approval.
4. Parking areas shall be striped in a double- stripe "hairpin"
design. The parking lot shall be kept in a continual state of
repair. All parking stalls shall be 9.5 feet • wide, except for
five 12- foot -wide handicap parking stalls.
5. If construction has not begun within two years of approval,
Board review shall be repeated.
6. Additional site lighting shall be provided, subject to the
requirements of the Director of Public Safety. Site lights
shall be directed or screened so not to cause any undue glare
onto adjacent properties or roadways.
7. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the
City Engineer's approval.
8. The landscape plan shall be submitted to Staff for approval.
All required landscaping shall be continually and properly
maintained. All required plant materials that die shall be
replaced by the owner within one year.
9. Reflectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be
provided.
10. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction
shall be restored and resodded.
11. The building exterior shall be continually and properly
maintained.
12. Approval of conditional use permit and a 1.8 -foot front
setback variance by the City Council.
13. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form
acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated
cost of any site improvements that are not completed by
occupancy. The applicant shall also provide Staff with proper
documentation, to be approved by the City Attorney which
allows staff access onto the property to finish work that
may not be completed.
411
2
410
Appeals
Appeals to the Community Design Review Board's decision shall be
made in writing within 10 days of the Board's motion. Appeals are
reviewed by the City Council.
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Site size: 11 acres
2. Existing Land Use: Church of St. Jerome, school and day care
SURROUNDING LAND USES
Northerly: Roselawn Avenue and single dwellings
Southerly: undeveloped single -and multiple- dwelling property
Easterly: two single dwellings on large lots
Westerly: single dwellings and McMenemy Street
PLANNING
1. Land Use Plan designation: C, Church and S, School
2. Zoning: F
PUBLIC SAFETY
The following are recommended: high security doors and locks, an
alarm system, more lighting in the parking lot, a security meeting
should be held with the Maplewood Police Department before the
addition is used, and a secure areafor valuables (coats, etc.)
should be provided.
TESTJEROME
Attachments
1. Land Use Plan
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan Reduction
4. Applicant's letter of request dated January 15, 1990
5. Plans date stamped January 17, 1990 (separate attachment)
411 3
• 1
•
IP . —31-7*. _ _
interc . - � : ' a l d a / -�
—, after/a .. / • ' t
I.. ., „ interchange " ' .
N ' . _ =_ =r- � 1- ;
/ ', t 1 Cot�n V at • Jr J 1 I ' S.-
;r
.Major ctor � � - RI /
I S' !dL i� i i I . - _ — : I 1 . ' v ,, *11' 1 1 -c•//-.,r1i',1-11--1-1.) ,
111 l I i l l I I I � J CI1 - !� l � r . - . art in Rllic�I e g t' -� t, (_ o
�� LSC � • I ! i!' . {., ► ' ' ro
W. • !iRI j l ', SC . ��
II . - S rzosei in .. � -, � . ,
0 ;■.. interchan a -- _. major collector ° \‘
1 „ lir .. ( n I I VI' ' 2,k/it \-6\ 1-
i 1 R ill y -. - 1 — NJ l I I �,�``
1 -a' 2 -- I ! OS 1 �+ •;.
j o =__ . � 1 {J $ I . - i
= di f ;'� -{11 =
I I1 � I "' Si SiI III1 5 ,1 \
EL a - - — -- _ i � 1 _ ut, ` al 11; . 0 _ , ''
X - ;11 / PTr'. ' , SC
.� interchange • -�' major arteria • !
:e Iteur d " 4
cn
LSC
CT)
v z
W
Lilt..YG -t O I—:
Si- 1 p.YOMe-
■
o
N/ 1
0 Parkside
O
LAND USE PLAN N
4 Attachment 1
1
•
• •
74 J51 7 _ 4 4 CO
. GO ..9 X23 � I 1 S � — -- , � - 1 22 9 t ' E1
22 _ ∎ j 21 . T` N 1 -1 I r
z C 11 Z O 20 11 E . (� --1:19-1 zo !I — 5C� : 'L11 443 C
--7 -- _ — _ _ ?
1 19,...1%i.." 17 19 12 . 0 - —+t n�
A : 1 '7' U 375 la 17 w 17 ' 6
- - r _ 3 5 3 -a— O _ Q _ — U . : CI ]
16 o .I 16 15 W 1 I 1 j. � 5> ;Z.;
it fef 7e ease -
I1 120 , 1 la I i �1 —•z 3�- ' IS cM - ®13 - 1341111 -- 4.s1 34541 D o
�' , 1912 .15 8cl /
. 4...2. --. ''' ----------- lb R
I 1 � i � •'�� � 0 4.71 ac� JR � C g.71ac� 3,... ® _
-
I _ ,� i4 r
✓IZZs1 II 4
4• e. .31 ac. a
—...z.— $ (s) 380 ` ' t ` .. r f (
031 �� �
s,
1915
+ f 10 CHURCH OF T. JEROME
.S4 ac . ai
r r S'
✓� , N 189 c m
. M ,....,"?9, i�S _ _
s .c ,o e
n 17 � .5Io.c - -. •-.'_,�.� ( l J
• M.�u11[4001 -
cep
7 '77 0/) g ��; 1 y
— 1 I So3ac•
1111 ,L. i
�2 o f t r _ j 2 —
151l6c I i c '•
o? soedc. 1863
�, fie LA ,
p
., 415-111213fia .111; 1866 °'
. - 5.0ot 1855
1.I lac. � .A 294
i L 0: -- . Pli, ,-i., I
t {{ ii, Q 11 Sp*- J
Z5
I.L�nc
t.
R3 J o
• �G m ( 9) In c
011 r 124oc.
d
sr PI ( 13) e
iri . 3 ,..� 'j . i 7 3-3• - • :. 75 79 75 75 u ,a _IQ
1.13 a< 1 6 a : M A R KF• O RT • .11a
j 6 1 4 13 ;,2 1
°I /
5 o d ' - 7 -s (L) ,. 4 � (19) ," 6 E) ( � ( /6) I `n
' I ) OZO (25 75 7 75 750 75.19 i.�.s• - z aD RIPLEY AV ` - `
In 1 = OU TI.O A �
1.09.0.4. ' c 7 -SO •
�7 SO ( 7750 I 5Z. Bl /O/ 40 I � �' ,9`
t - �_ I lu) 1 (2_ l 12- I ...I'll `^ r
N. / 1
III PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
0
5 Attachment 2 N
. , t- /
0
•
. - r I _ ��.�.-
.1 1 T 1 t.
•
, 1 1 o _
� ..e.r coma o i I r =
go 1
1 I r • I r''—r:.
_�
i J I 1 .:. 1 .1 1 1 1 1 - r
1 - • --_ . ..n,rr 1/17, I• .01.1111 1+ 1 1 1 .. ��..
r ,r., 1 1 1, 1 4.G I r l l l ( po ..r. . 1 i11Illi.11t/li111l:i.... _ i
.•w1 UCTOIT _ f
1 j`llllll!"Ililllllally +I ■ �°" i
1111111JII!IIIIIL ^
• i - -- B ! "- !I�111�� "
ti sc.o« 1----P I L C G E `J D I
1 .--. ^ f••�w a w•,kJ
I ' f1.L'X 1 Ow i
M tK
• I f• .i�Y. D/�wt
• 1 . 11 r..
w •1 .r�•7 •M
^ i w a .mac -.+r •f
I 1 �. e o
1/ •
0
SITE PLAN n .
6 Attachment 3 N
, . i
•
4
Church of St. Jerome
380 E. Rose lawn Avenue
-
St. Paul, Minnesota 55117
ill
January 15, 1990
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN. 55109
SUBJECT: Statement for Conditional Use Permit (Renovation Church of St Jerome)
Statement (intended use of property and why city should approve
our request.)
Dear Sirs,
The Church of St. Jerome located at 380 East Roselawn Avenue in Maplewood,
Minnesota, is applying for a Conditional Use Permit this date.
Account the shortage of priests and the assignment of one parish priest
• with no assistant, and with membership increasing, it has become mandatory
to renovate the rectory in the church to secure 250 more seating capacity
to accomodate attendance for Masses, funerals, weddings, and other religious
liturgies all on one level. Use will be for church purposes only.
We have contacted all property owners within the radius of 350 feet in
accordance with Ramsey County Official Abstract of Title, and we are pleased
40 to inform you that there are no objections to our building project.
After our review of the criteria necessary for approval of CUP, we find that
we will be in compliance with all standards as outlined by the City of
Maplewood's CUP Permit application. The building project will in no way
be in conflict with the city's standards or policies.
Please refer to particularly Item 3 - the use would not depreciate property
values, and in reality, would enhance and improve the present site due
to the beautiful architecture and improved landscaping. As previously
stated, we will be in compliance and abide by all policies set down by the
City of Maplewood.
We trust you will find everything in order along with the checks in payment
for CUP and Design and Review Board applications. But, most of all, your
approval and to proceed without any delay. We want to be assured of a
hearing with the Design and Review Board on February 13, 1990, and if
arrangements can be arranged for February 6th - all the better. We want
the project finished on or before Thanksgiving of 1990.
Thank you for your courteous and prompt attention in the above matter.
Respectfully yours,
e l Reverend Father Kenneth F. Ludescher
Encl.
7
Attachment 4
■
A
•
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Design Review
LOCATION: 3M Center, North of Conway Avenue
APPLICANT /OWNER: 3m Company
PROJECT TITLE: Buildings 275, 264 and 261
DATE: February 6, 1990
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
1. The applicant is requesting approval of plans to construct
three new buildings at 3M Center. Building 275 will be a
a six - story, 580,000- square -foot office building, Building 264
will be a two - story, 90,350- square -foot food - service building
and Building 261 which will be a 170,945- square -foot,
three -level parking ramp.
2. The office and food - service buildings will have exteriors of
brick and glass. The parking ramp will be precast concrete.
BACKGROUND
On May 25, 1989, the Community Design Review Board approved
4 Building 271, a seven -level parking ramp west of Building 270.
Building 271 was the first phase of the overall development plan
for this immediate area.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of plans date - stamped January 30, 1990, for 3M Buildings
275, 264 and 261, subject to the following conditions:
1. Any outdoor trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening
enclosures as required by code.
2. Any exterior building or roof - mounted equipment shall be
decoratively screened and hidden from view. Screening is
subject to Board approval.
3. Parking areas shall be striped in a double - stripe "hairpin"
design.
4. If construction has not begun within two years of approval,
Board review shall be repeated.
5. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed
or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent
properties or roadways.
410
410
6. Grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plans shall be
subject to the City Engineer's approval.
7. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly
maintained. All required plant materials that die shall be
replaced by the owner within one year.
8. Reflectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be
provided.
9. Proper building addresses shall be installed, subject to the
approval of the Fire Marshal.
10. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form
acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated
cost of any site improvements that are not completed by
occupancy. The applicant shall also provide staff with proper
documentation, to be approved by the City Attorney which
allows staff access onto the property to finish work that
may not be completed
Appeals
Any appeals of the Community Design Review Board's conditions must
be made in writing to the City Staff within ten days of the Board's
approval.
TE3M
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Plans date stamped January 30, 1990 (separate attachments)
2
% z l�\ 2 I I I IW
r -_,3 I
I
Y 31 -_ 1 t Ir �IAWTHORNE AV
7 No A
i.ii . ®' 68 F vwSF p H ST A
N GERM
�, 2
GE R
/� ���,,f• �1.1-1 o M
eoYer MAGNOL • AV 4y PO
f{ � u o
-' �) 11 o N 2 P 5
2 Lake ) w , ).- � �Itnt � •
a N S r a E P l
: J rn o ¢ 0
\ N
a� CASE AV AR NESTER z 4 AV
a pJ / ¢ F w
TILL'S 2 BRAND W LA AV
3p ' ® Q a ~ �C1�n El
•
a
1 - a
m
0 4,.Q SE ENTH ST EQ E 9SEVENTH ST
2 3P z_
Y
0 ) v .�■
`, RUSH AV Y J' � ' S .' �
x
w , 1 > C
>- 1- Cr 1
W IY 4
I MINNEHAHA 2 m 2 AV
` 5 1 c� �, MARGARET 3 4.
O
cn
.." i r� \
I E FIFTH .
W
VVVV r r J
/ • b a
71 • 14 1 i c J
1 L F • ' 1 �,• � - L, U 2 FREM -W %YR AV
1 c _� f •!^ . _ L J , W Q
• ��2.T s , 1 _
r iNwr. 1 �nV ERVI DR
i 1: ! I I 11 y
-. 1 - - iv,V 1
4" 1 .� I: i Ili 2 'S 1 1 1 = E`I
. I 1 - _ I 11240 t " � _ - °
A v_.._._' 1 I I 1 Ql8':7%3, \ .- '"15 IT I �' 7
1..._ .- - J -4— w�( �` - .�JL -m-- -- J Inc � 'D 7 I -. • 'i n ��� TTT I '225, I 1�21 1 1
I X 3 1 `< nu
Q.) 2301 1 F2 I '- 1 _ l 1 i
■ I 11 I 1 — 1 ) /
® , � �I rcr�ers
1(1 ok e
12
0
T2BN,R22 j. 94
JS }36 _ L
2 t ¢ .- �FJ)8h�,f 1\
t... . c '� oR
ao
tQ v ^.`rEA LA
r�
v, JAMES OR ( Z 4 I--
W J V) Q
-J W J
W a' z J J
J O W
K, Q U 2 z Q 1
W U 0 W W Q V
UPPER AFTON RD ~ O 2 '- ° 7 r--
\ .
• i
LOCATION MAP •
'Ct
Attachment 1 "
3 n
•
, k
(
1 i
_ .
1..
•
) _
‘
-).6 • ■__},...._/-
•
0 tr
qe. a) -cl A r COX) 6 0
0103/ ..._
• 0 I 0 .1
Aroolto 0 . 4.' a 0 ez
oz. i
.• 0
• d'o i 40.0-' Is
'irtii n . ---. • 0 I'l
e llkr... --...-.. fk.
0
14]...-1-Iiiiis , lg.., :::::.:0..:: 3 3
,..,..,:::,.....:..:..:3,::„..:,....k: - 1
.• .: . :on It I ite
..w.::;?........v.,.. , ,og 17 ,.. 4
• nAes.,....:::::::„..„,,.,;.4.•.. DI %I I
•IP
ca.
....,...„, 17civii.7 -•*<*:::::: -4,,, A . A
.,:,..4.. a , 0 •
•
•
t kr
. :::*:.•.:..:::0:41,4 II h., ._. L
c q ... ..gamis li
1 9 0 • - . -. - - 1.1.11.1.1r •
4 1 I L @& 1 C4g 4
0 111111 C\1
0 0 , ,jik . i i., i
'-- - 0-11■42
4 1, 4 - 21 4 1 •■•
- -
41 ..• — ' - • ' . •• ::.- .97 ::: ..,41::..j...:,:;:, :s : - "111W
(11 C.....
00 ;' ' ...•:•*••;:::: :A::: '., : 0: ....e. ;#: ::::kiiiel:•:::::::*M.......... ..,:...,
0 4 10:".;';' , , ....::.,./....§ ".:: ..... . •::::. As'.4. ::::•i*if.s:•ex:m : Z
• ....„,• ,,,..1".. '.'5f., . ';',* 4 . 4?:;0?;<:,:e.'„ :::::1::' .:::: • -,1
8 ,.......• • - , ..,.. 4,:,.. . ....„:„.:,,..:...,,: a: .......„
. -,:...ar..$ , ....-'.f:.,:sc., , ..,...,::::::;0...„,..,.: .....„.......„ v ...... -" -, -, .:7-_- - -,:-.:7 1 ..
''..# : w . 4/...' 3 ,,,,,,, ,, , ,, .. •::.•::::::ff.....4.,:—. . ::::...,... 1 11 D .,,. . 4 (:::1
\\\ . , .4- ........,e •...;..„,..:„,,,,..-...„,....„.:...:, .,,,.:::::„...:.
. -...,...- ,:,..:A :',... MO. .P...:. '',..,?,'::,,,,,,,, :6 .......:76 .w- • • :, .....
.4 Ks?... ::•:: 7 P.,.• .1 ,.:,,, ' •;•:•:::::: .4
,,... . 1x , 7.,:rqW•A:. ..:::• :•,:,...; :::-.: .
....- . ./„.5 ........ 5.5. , .. ,. ..... , : ,.../ .:; ./. 1 1,:,/ 4 . 4 , _. • •
" ' ::: :.. : ‘. ,:g ?S ...,..., •.: ..
...' .: ,,..:: ./..:- ., . -:7:' • •••
'. ::K;',.' .'d . ff . , •
--.1
.x.... , ....-...: , ,,p..,..., :„., - .• t web PC1
\ 0 . ••• --gni. -- -- ,....-1. ,I,•"'""VA-,;74,,,,,t. ci
IIII
..- Q1,.•
-
ink , ' 0 a
0-. 1 l la
\ •
1,5 ....
t .
•
j .. :
. •
. '
.1 ............ ....01•1=1MIMIII=11
C
•
III
4 Attachment 2