HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/18/1989 (2) • MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment
LOCATION: West side of Walter Street, south of Frost Avenue
APPLICANT: City of Maplewood
OWNER: First State Bank of Hugo
DATE: December 13, 1989
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The City is proposing a land use plan amendment from RM, medium -
density residential, to RL, low- density residential, for the area
west of Walter Street and south of Frost Avenue. This is shown
on the maps on pages 4, 5, 6 and 7.
BACKGROUND
As the "Past Actions" section on page 2 shows, this site has had
a history of controversy. Past attempts to reconcile the zoning
and land use plan have failed for lack of four votes. With the
current proposal for single- dwelling homes, this conflict should
be able to be resolved.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Plan amendments require no specific findings for approval. Any
amendment, however, should be consistent with the City's land use
goals and policies.
DISCUSSION
The zoning designation for a property defines the current
development rights for that site while the land use plan
designation is the City's expected future use of the property.
Since the property owner has divided the property into three
single - family home sites, the medium - density land use designation
is not consistent with the expected development of the property.
The proposed land use designation (RL) would make the R -1 zoning
and land use designation consistent for this site.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution on page 8 to amend the land use plan for the
area west of Walter Street from RM, medium - density residential,
to RL, low- density residential, on the basis that the property
• owner is developing the area with single - family homes which are
consistent with an RL land use designation.
REFERENCE
Site Description
Area: 37,500 square feet (.86 acres)
Existing land use: three undeveloped single - dwelling lots
Surrounding Land Uses
North: Frost Avenue, a City park and the DNR trail
East: Walter Street and single - family homes
South: Single - family homes
West: Single - family homes
Past Actions
8- 23 -82: The City Council considered a request from Michael
Mularoni to:
1. Vacate Walter Street from Fenton Street to Frost
Avenue.
2. Vacate Fenton Street from Adele Street to Walter
Street.
3. Rezone the site from R -1, single - dwelling, to R -3,
multiple- dwelling.
The purpose was to construct two four -unit quad buildings. A
motion to approve the rezoning failed with three votes in favor.
11 -8 -82: Council amended the land use plan for the area
surrounding this site from RM, residential medium - density, to RL,
residential low- density. The Mularoni site was specifically
excluded.
5- 19 -83: District Court upheld the City's denial of the 1982
rezoning after a suit was brought against the City by Mr.
Mularoni.
1- 28 -85: Council denied a rezoning from R -1 to R -3.
Summer, 1989: Walter Street was constructed from Fenton Street
to Frost Avenue.
8- 22 -89: The City approved a lot split for this property for the
present owner to create three single - family home lots fronting on
Walter Street. (See the plan on page 7.)
2
11- 16 -89: Council initiated a study of properties which have
zoning and land use designations that are inconsistent.
411
Planning
Low - Density Residential (RL) - "This classification is primarily
designated for a variety of single - dwelling homes. An occasional
double dwelling may be allowed. The maximum population density
is 14 people per net acre" (page 18 -29).
Medium- Density Residential (RM) - "This classification is
designated for such housing types as single - family houses on
small lots, two - family homes, townhouses, and mobile homes. The
maximum population density is 22 people per net acre" (page 18-
30) .
Walterst
jl
Attachments
1. Gladstone Neighborhood Land Use Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. 1982 Plan Amendment Area Map
4. Approved Lot Split Plan
5. Plan Amendment Resolution
•
•
3
L • 1
6.
0
;
V v
c 0
0 o
3
0 c
N
•
E _
i • villas /, 1 �;� ■ !1
'1, -_ sums11/ DI�1111/ _ -
i ..., ...a., _ .!.� _ {i 1 W.IHIi 1111. .c. - • . gI , — __. tin 4 7. P _ `III . . . fa . i
k\' . ........--....:
-. 1 , tbn "11 r INI II. - i ' A m _ "
• - _ ii
t :Fr f
'�, ii I h`� , -�
. r �✓O S F ;40-
. _ IkT - r • .r
� -
O� a �• - smile __ 11/1111 u .
II i ‘ ell 11 II IILSC ! AM ltm7rI6ollecinr Ii
Saint Paul .c
e
O
c
W
REVISED
4 -08 -86
/ \
0 GLADSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD
O
LAND USE PLAN N
A Attachment 1
\ o
•
• •
• " It • 7 '''''''
t ,---- ----
sO TA
• to 1 t 414s
&A t+
WO WA.' OF
L 0 TO VILLAGE Or MAPLEWOOD
ST P 4.
(c. t'....) Av '1504
8
/ c ( \
4111-1-FReSILMI41-1111-111 111-111-MH11-111-11111 -111-111-111-111
•
NJ . .
ZAN; - o
" 1 • it 14' 1 //, s.'s'IL j rt.,- j : itt .t ....2_:
......
ir 1 i.,... :i • (.,, ., L r .// • . - i
/ - a . Q • ■si 1 ; a r
-- - BI---
„
OP I 1 .1 . 7 , t—To. .
,
. . ..„......._ ,
--,-7
,
• .4 II D .... . ..._':....
0 -- '' 1: , • .., ft: .i. p, P's,1- 04\tS
. 4:1F i ^O 1 . r • t. .. 4 .. , , i , .1
- - - I - - - - ,-- -;-;
24. z 411 .= "...sr' ; •":.' ) •,---....,•-:: z 9 • • .1 ■ 2 .
... ..„. ,1 .. ic: .6 • ••--- - -; -. 7. 1 •.t- Z.„ ..., '-' 7 :,, - 7' r--,
• 4 4 4 4. •• ''. t., --.. IS lc 7
1
: ENT
14 3 FON aimiNsas
,. . . u 1 ,...e, , e ,
4110
, r--
, it ! , . ; s-,, • ,*-tz -,„,„ 5/ II SI • :, tt . , 2 ..... •
H-
1 .a .9., rt . 5 • • i 5 q -...s...... ,1 ll , ' P. • •
z .. . ... I:
. 4 , . . 7 . 4 P• i 7 . , - - -. :.., - ..... -
• ;.$ •• ■ • 1 1 7 '•
t) an I 1 . ••••••■•$;-N.. 4._ —...... -
:..- -1 ...- TT-- .. - - -7 -• ...--.. --
U 0 1 , - • .....c. •••:s • - s ;-- • z ;;; L....J -4
I 2 '-',1_,:3; ,, • :' ' -.2...; L
, -----..-77 5 7 - . ..., . t7, •-:.-s-G- b
a
J ,'
....PI ••• ---1: •: ••••• ;.7 . " .. al -1 7.4. 1 S ' , ..4 . , -- • ...:
'' Ill it .4'Soi. j . : • . ''LL __L.... ,.;___, --- --
...• 1 . .. .-... % u . 1 .1
F , : • 3 , ,,, Li), ,,,, i 3. 2. ,,,,, L _
. - - -
66 _ __..i . , :...■
, ,,.. !. / , ; ...-a--. . 74 ■•, ' ' 1 ■ .1
• 0 ' ..•:_sa.,!" - •...1 4_ ,,. __,.... ...--
10 ;'3' e?,::•..; . z . s... czt ?, 1741 ,..,' . . 4 A ::... ■ 1 . ,... ' i;
-J 7; '
-- . .. . ' . .. . - it .. .L0.117 i. ..... • .., .._ 1 :,.... z 1__ !.... _ ._:.. — .....p \•••\
li.• ' • i S.ta...v.i:_7_.121.1.4. .17. -7 : 7 . -•••• 0 • E 1 ••• 4
.... ,). " :. - • 1 ‘a-•- - • ! -4:';.•• 4 z ;it : if-- - - 12.4._ _ ,_, w
:laria , tr 1• • 07' ! !. 1 tp . 1 'F. 7 .2_ ' ' ....1.. ! _ .......::
MI - -: ; i • •• ,.... :: . --- " ---- ' 3.-. •• :., 0 :-• ••••2 7,..7's .. .. ,7 '; 4 . '7 < 4' - 7 r 4
, 3
• ••crer-s— o
. F : Ear. • . J GORD0 ‘ ' - ‘" .. ' y l 4"--4— --7:'
4p4;: t4.p. cas; ( 7 7 . , a I r 4. " '1 .; II' ' , :. 11 ...' ,e, 1 i .
. i „..1 L.i.) s , .... ,,,, - 4: ; „',.1 .1' ,:.3 ■1-1 ,44 - --'"'.--- 7- 1
* P.OL, 41 :C.' ri ), ;4*-; •-• . •" , _ ._:.._,, •••- ..
e - , , •-•;- -- c• -
p •••• •al. 1 - map.... " .0
• 'V . :.
---, !NRIPLEY-
1 /
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
• L____,
5 N
Attachment 2
/ . • )
. .
• I
11111• — N..
•
. n
i . - . --- -- t ------- gp*"0 • 11
Iss
- --- A 4 • 1 , .ry_...._.
1:. ...,,, Lp,. , ,,r..(..0)
, • • - -- l a
_....--- ..„,,,, 0 11.- L. ,. ) ,, , • -, ,-
,......-- •
... •
._ - r i •
' 1 • q
O C. 1$111W
— ----- — - , . — — —
_ .. , .... WV /FS p.m V.. r••■ ..".. lei ES MO
• •... • ... :,,, ..,
. , 1
2 .....„,„...............
:.,---
...............,.::::::.,... ._
-,-,-,, I TT ---- '
.4:::::::::::::.*::..::-....- • 'e• t _ , : v•
, — „i - • ,. • • ,,,
ri c•s a 1 $ PI ' .. , ,, , :.: — — ...::.. -- -- .••■ .--. ■-......;
. gi.:iii:;:i4::::::::::::::::::. I - . 1 ,-, t 7 ____,. 7
. ., 1.1 ..,-.. - • t.
_' r -- -- —Lif _ ..., •
IA . ':::::.:::,:; (r) I 4 1 4 _ 4 .
.3 . .-- t... - in
el .;,,• .
• ,,..
41 • i ' l IMANK
:..". 1 13 C
,–
1
. iS
• I r. • ' miii i........::::::::::::::::::-
ti;.1,
,,--,_‘. 4 0_,-..
UN.:
.`.5' 5 " 15 • - 11 - - - - ---' - _ .. _ .._
r C ..,- , ' ■• • • P
qn i . .
T 4— — — -11- -
.;-
1 v ; 0.4 • •1•06 al .
• ,
...-4 —1
•0 ' —•• — — --•-• Ala • ult - 7 -- —
T
7 0 2 -L\ r . i , ,, , '' T 7 — i , ' ' IN. ' &
I. c ...- . ,
A ...--.' .... . 0 C r _ A T 0 N il ri 11 Et 1
• ,•,- .. . _ • .. . - . -
___. .j.J i...1 _ _ ..—
. i
...• , I i •''' , 1 1 • ,
../. ' i '''.....,
.., ,
••!"..' :";..ke- ''. .— —L. — — .1--j
1 - , . •
/
r
.. , - . ! f• , I L , 1
, ••••" V •
..••• • •" ..o 0`
.-- i ....._ r7, ,:..-.. 7 ..
CIO) , I ', 7 R . • ! 5 ;,^ i e
e• 0 ltc. I 1
... • i , ....0...... .
•
,...•,,, . ____,,,,, _ __, ,__, _____ __,__ _
., ,... ,, . ll — — — --/- —•• — — —
D. I,„
I 4 I
r • A - Cs e , ZI • .“ ■...... . . . . . . . ■ ,■ . . . . . . - . . . •••• ■-.■ ,_ ... 4 _ , ...... 7 _ 1 .... ......._._,„
a
- .., . I., , _
_ ...... — — -- ..
,L....4 .7
. A L.) ; • , , -0-4417-
, ? ..1.... '
-- - . .L _ — —
4110 ii •
4....,.e. , _ '' • 7 1 4 ,•, • .. 1 i ‘ 4 . 1 1
_
. , ',....... ■ (.,
‘ ..4. - 1 -- .
rT: L... ,
' 1 ;,'", . '' • ,.....„ „ ... , - - — -- — — 1:1::
7 -,- — —
, • ,
) I I ; Id
../ - , „, . J..• — —..---1 1 ; — — --.
— /6.) ''•-' '', L r _, .. . - • . _ _
'— i, ' ' k •
: F- 2,
_ _ _ _ 4 _
. , , •
f .. , 1 j 1 4 ......, r:• •■ . 17,i7 : : • r
I'
4 a
i , I . , •
li 1,541, 1, ,‘ t, • ? IS:•%) A < 7 _ -.L 7 ._ ...._ 7
. ,-• , . - . f. • ,,.• :-A ; :; 11 . ,.. c '' _ ttl — --4-'1 — —
.„ i
.65 • ,... . 1 - ' C At 4 ' ' r '' ' ' I. '. , ... .. : „,- ------ — --- — •r7
, :
. ,.
, 11 ,•••• • L
f I- . . 2 ... ' --j i I
• , • - 1
,• .e. t • •
. ..,
--;
......._
■
- 'le" ./•.,,/ i li ''' --..--" --“:31' ----'---- -- —
Poet Sit' 1 6 : 17. -- ) . '.., • ' - - - - . . • , ...• /
.„ -I
• . a, .,-\ .
OF T. - UL oTo - . s . Aklikor r•
, , _ • / , - 1 , T . , ,
4 r . I ; 1
-,.
••i N E Wr ' 4 : • , 1 • - I ,
- . 2".=-, . , A •••
le - - L A - - . •T •• - \ ,
. RIFL_E.:.Y
•
__-
1
IFT---------.., _. ...., ,
.„,. , .. ..,.
,.__ ,* . ,.... I .). .
1 Alt 4,- : ' . ' i•cs ., ' •• •:,;, . .
\ - . ' , -- .,, It s '.... . -...; ,--, , 1
I
-..„ t* .• -
....„. ( •,, . *i ' ' • cs., 4 ' ,4'. . , . , i - (-.
\ ' I
•..., ' • -. C. c 4. . N ce \.- , ,
A . ■)„, ,
IL
14,.. .
• PROPERTY LINE MAP
(AREA AMENDMENT FROM RM to RL on 11-8-82)
1111 Property exempted from this N
amendment at the request of 6 Attachment 3
., • _ ___ „ ‘... _
FROST AVENUE
ag o
t 1 b
d'9., I
O
( I °
.> - y
1 ^ I E 3
1lJ I ti r
1 —1- °
G 1 y
It G� j � ° o
I ° o � 9 1 - --•-C)
l I 1
1 1 0�
.;
1 tql
1 \-' W
150. 1 Z
O. I W
1
1
I
o
. n 1 C3 �
.-
1
i 1 41
/50.00 1 W v, '',,\`'`((‘
' I
I i l / \ 'C. .....-
1 h � d
as- o 1 W
h F-
LPG . 1 1
� 1
I
--..-0) ,
, 1
• 0. 00 —
.t —/5
Cj
L t
ti
7 'Attachment 4
•
PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the
Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RM, medium - density residential,
to RL, low - density residential, for the following- described
property:
Lots 4 through 10, Block 4, Kavanagh and Dawson Addition to
Gladstone
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as
follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing
on December 18, 1989, to consider this plan amendment. Notice
thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons
present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and
present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended
to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan
amendment on , 1990. The Council considered
reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City
staff.
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis
of the following findings of fact:
1. The RL land use plan designation will be consistent
with the zoning and expected development of the
property.
Adopted this day of , 1990.
8
Attachment 5
M
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment and Rezoning
LOCATION: Radatz Avenue, west of White Bear Avenue
APPLICANT: City of Maplewood
DATE: December 13, 1989
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The City is proposing a land use plan amendment from RM, medium
density residential to RL, low density residential and a rezoning
from F, farm residential to R -1, single dwelling residential for
the area north of Radatz Avenue and west of White Bear Avenue.
This is shown on the maps on pages 4, 5 and 6.
BACKGROUND
February 27, 1984: The City Council considered and tabled for
further investigation a plan amendment from RM to RL for this area.
November 16, 1989: The City Council initiated a study by staff
of properties which have zoning and land use designations that
are inconsistent.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
• Plan Amendment
Plan amendments require no specific findings for approval. Any
amendment, however, should be consistent with the City's land
use goals and policies.
Rezoning
Section 36 -485 of the City Code requires the following findings
to approve a rezoning:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit,
purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or
detract from the use of neighboring property or from
the character of the neighborhood, and that the use
of the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable, and
the public welfare.
•
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon
the logical, efficient, and economical extension of
public services and facilities, such as public water,
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
DISCUSSION
The zoning designation for a property defines the current
development rights for the site while the land use plan
designation is the City's expected future use of the property.
The RM land use designation is inconsistent with the existing
development of the properties. The proposed land use amendment
and rezoning would make the zoning and land use designations
consistent with the existing development of the area.
The area in question is currently zoned farm residential and has
developed with single - family homes on one -half acre lots fronting
on Radatz Avenue. These properties should be zoned R -1 to be
consistent with the existing single - family use of these lots.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Approve the resolution on page 6 which amends the land use
plan for the area north of Radatz Avenue from RM, medium density
residential to RL, low density residential on the basis that the
area is developed with single - family homes which are consistent
with a RL land use designation.
• 2. Approve the resolution on page 7 to rezone the property
along the north side of Radatz Avenue west of White Bear Avenue
from F, farm residential to R -1, single dwelling residential
based on the findings required by ordinance and that R -1, single
family dwelling residential zoning is consistent with the current
development of the property.
• 2
• REFERENCE
Site Description
Area: 337,225 square feet (7.74 acres)
Existing land use: 12 single - family dwellings and two undeveloped
parcels each approximately one -half acre in size.
Surrounding Land Uses
North: Property zoned BC -M developed with retail uses and offices.
East: An undeveloped parcel zoned LBC. Along the west side of
White Bear Avenue are three single family homes zoned BC
and planned for an automobile service mall.
South: Radatz Avenue and single - family dwellings.
West: Parcels zoned R -2 developed with duplexes and Southlawn
Avenue.
Planning
Low Density Residential (RL) - "This classification is primarily
designated for a variety of single - dwelling homes. An occasional
double dwelling may be allowed. The maximum population density is
14 people per net acre" (page 18 -29).
• Medium Density Residential (RM) - "This classification is
designated for such housing types as single - family houses on small
lots, two - family homes, townhouses, and mobile homes. The maximum
population density is 22 people per net acre" (page 18 -30).
Existing zoning: F, Farm Residential which allows single - family
dwellings, general farming, commercial greenhouses and nurseries.
Livestock raising, manufactured home parks and golf courses are
permitted with a conditional use permit.
Proposed zoning: R -1, Single Dwelling Residential which allows
single - family dwellings, public parks and home occupations. Golf
courses and the storage of commercial vehicles are permitted with
a conditional use permit.
Attachments
1. Hazelwood Neighborhood Land Use Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Plan Amendment Resolution
4. Rezoning Resolution
kenmemo23
•
3
_
4L .
1
Interchange
interchange • principal arterial 894
gym. ■
-- _ `.III —
R ■ G71i rr ® 11� – 1m a� j o
---- - - - - -: ;4111•14111111111•1 -- II i i 1 1 I T i i 1 1111111111111111111.1
j
Co. R•. - R•. - 11 11 i collector
-/ 1 .
II BW ;RB �■ r
i T-
DC 0 ; `
major 'l a —77; ■ a.h i.*o
t
8 collector .. . ` o I 44444. f s� i
— _ . , I ° J .F. J J �
.. ) ��am 1 a � , par`.. e
r - BW r I � �" - � ..'� —:
sc i ___ I T . f► 211 ift,..-. MI
.1 1 I L . i i IL ' I __ •
. i f rteI
1
r � . DoT' '�
"I-1 111111111111111 A 6P ...,, : ,._..L . ..-:_—__I : : R — log= � i sc 1
��. • , 1 i. ! o � d _ ..,:zel•
: - n .
, ,..., : . ,i
REVISED
3 -25 -85 9 -29 -87
4 -08 -85 9 -21 -88
8 -26 -85 10-27-88 1
10 -09 -85 4 -17 -89
11 -06 -85 7 -21 -89
7-07-86 10 -06 - 89
10 -10 -86
12 -30 -86
,
1 / N
• HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD f)' .
LAND USE PLAN N
4 Attachment 1
1 I -
1
•
. •,..s
..; . .4. .. -.... ...2.
. `,..
30 . t. 4 1 Ili' ...... •:::
, a 73133 • - .. . „ • .
. •
• a ••11 . .3
• .7 24 ,:i■
1.
t 4 .- - 03 - .- • Atsr. COUAT -..," 41 "... V, t ,..
1111
37t 10 3 -
i, -..
.-. g' i'; /WC NO /t0 t
. ..,
z. t; . . . _ •. _ ...,._ ...... ..
iD,... ,t 043416
t .0.11 •■■••• •ea et ^siC ; .17 'tug . 3,3.1.• • . ., .
1 „.. 11: ..
3, . . - • • • - •1•:. 100 „3,3 630 100 . 100 • . Ito .- ... . , il31 - • II. • : y. .. __ _ . ,. . ,.. .„ •
. 1.1 .• f•'. ".". . Avecsests 9 , .o.'
....- g ."-t ":a. II ?Lot • ".. 64; ..
.,....
;C- 111 221". 0 2..55 ...... I ot tOtoc :I • .1 4 ;"•: .
II ... 1. t. •
- :4B () . ' , .. 0., 0)0 wrzij-: t - 4
,/,,,,,,,,Ita) 1 .
• .., i P/Eg III. gii9
'.4
si
•
.... A V V : • ' ? , qi3 !
• b H - f2.E -
-
A 1 k °Ale
: „ i . 4 , - - , oil
0) St ° • ',-. '''' : 7 39ac.
(snot . 05a • Ea. .,
" - ' . ' ' 104111.• I IN ( . 4„so; :
c• • -s) i.o. ac
. 1
111 ,4, - : :::,.: : i.i;;: qi E::TBiCi.et-':: ..:...:.,,•...-..: . ;:j:;:c0 . :.-..- . c1141 . ' t ',: ,.::i ::Q :' ' '4 , 0 4 7 '1:: : i. :11 1
.. 1 ._. 4:::::::: ,... :Alla::: :::::::::::::::::::: :::::::.,•:::,:::::: ::::::::::::,,,:: :::::tq...,•.. ::::::::::::::::::::: .:.. gr ., ..::::::::::::: •,,L, :.":.::;:::: .::::;::::::;:. c .„,
-,- . , - , : f.t,:: .:.• i :::::,,, : : : :::: - •••-•;;_-:,'-••••:: :, ETT : ::••• :::::,4 ,
r -. LL'.1 -.: ':.,:::::::::::::::::::::::::,'::,:::,::: ..w:_::::::,:. 40-7..•:.:ip.i.:460.4...:,..::::..:::::::pc, 0 • '
.., ._ : '',',1 • 4 . : : •:::
ta::::0:: ::::0::::::::i: .•:tj .1:T.:
w ilmoussonsustinvz . " • AVE.
c .„,., 1
. .. L.. io. 200 II 001 ID 7
Iv .., - ... ' - - 's - 51 " , s 5 0
-,... - ,;,..",. .:::. .•..... .,i.. „ .4,.... 6 .,.... I •39
i ,.. (...) 2 1. .., mil • .1..„, .14 u,.., •./. 1.
.. ...1........ . 14 sc ., . 17. . 37 ...„. • _ ,.... „... ,......, 2
15, _
I ;8 11 ft ( it
, 1_1 :1 t• . c:', c ..- s : Ef n:[3:-', CO, Dli t HP 1 ...- &
, -
4 ...'6 -..(,,) t4 (,.., '--4'::. - st 1-
( 30) ,--).. c,,..-' ( 2.7) s:.. (UP) 4.' (23) '' 13 11
^ <I 45 ) 3 1 1... 2
sl (z 0
ill IR g Si c. il g 93 Ci0 Fll T (al q g . II
L, .e. I , a ( w) (34
, - - . lit cis
.,,k..,..,. Ro LIT. '---------' 3...1.111...1 ....
itti.-:1 (-0,.)
.
47 4, 544 CD ' 11.1 44 *
111 i.zi; "...- -,.,„ . . .
1_ -----/ ni API.E ). „. 10 $4 .... it 1 ' ( so a )
...e., _
.(4411;:s
16 49 5 1 7
(42) IN 0.4.‘ s - - o)
-:.; ". 3 05 s ,.•" ' -
PUD. 44/3 'Ti .--.. / I '' . (22') :
/ - .111 1 : I. BC4r.... m
2 ( r [ IL ,
0'
I • ''
-4 ....‘s,
1 : 7,,... 1 31 i'
. --. -- Aliep - Z
4 .
t ' .1: sr 1" ./ • , .. ..""' ; . :.: OUTLC
,g .• .
....
.• t : O.) 8 , . ... ,.
' •- ....,
I/ ..I 04 • - • '
i60,5 • ,0 * •■ '° "
S100. 2 300 i.t• ..., • .-
9.
, ..Z._ .,,,,,,st • Ig q R3 :21
---1; 2 (II)
4.•
.. .4. c. ier 2 •• •c ,-;--,..- .41,0 ., 1 61 a , , --:
,. .
--......., , F. ..i.
6 'a
12) q:
.L,
k,.., 1.53 ac
....--- 238 7' - .., - , •. 2114.s
1 ,1/2 „,4-‘
0 •P 11,' I:, C
-•.'. OM .
.07 1-7A01 b I 0 4 ab
7, 9. c
5.131 o
.0 - i •
(
E C3. - ..,... 3 ... (9) :
V. 3
(G ! 71 n
. 0 1. 0, .
- r wo °T
I'' cs-37.7..
P . , 02.) ,•• ___ .. (3) -
(....)
-. 205 • " C.
L' ,-.
I'. •Oac u
(.4.I0) • N I - 1.32 c. :b
\ ..'''' ( (2) . ;. 4 .., 2. 92 •c.
1 9 (3': %-,,, ., ,
00, :„.... -,
(io
. , • •
; 1 :1 ...:, . Ty
.
,,, ...-.7,- 1
.....- .....,
i ,
,
qI 'l 7 '
- .. .4
rr-e. . ,
- .11
: I ; . ; 4- 'I .,-, . - - .1 -: • • .1. AC •
i
.
N c
11 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
N
..„ ..... ,
5 Attachment 2
•
A
i PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION
•
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the
Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RM, medium density residential
to RL, low density residential for the following- described
property:
The south 240 feet of that property lying north of the
Radatz Avenue right -of -way from 117 feet east of the South -
lawn Avenue right -of -way to 265 feet west of the White Bear
Avenue west right -of -way line.
This property is more commonly described as 1795 to 1921
Radatz Avenue.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as
follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing
on December 18, 1989 to consider this plan amendment.
Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to
law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said plan amendment be approved.
• 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan
amendment on , 1990. The Council
• considered reports and recommendations from the
Planning Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis
of the following finding of fact:
The area is developed with single - family homes which are
consistent with a RL land use designation and it is unlikely
to redevelop for RM uses.
Adopted this day of , 1990.
• 6 Attachment 3
REZONING RESOLUTION
• WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F,
farm residential to R -1, single family for the following -
described property:
The south 240 feet of that property lying north of the
Radatz Avenue right -of -way from 117 feet east of the
Southlawn Avenue right -of -way to 265 feet west of the White
Bear Avenue west right -of -way line.
This property is also known as 1795 to 1921 Radatz Avenue,
Maplewood:
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as
follows:
1. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on December 18, 1989. The Planning
Commission recommended to the City Council that said
rezoning be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
, 1990 to consider this rezoning.
Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to
law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
• The Council also considered reports and recommendations
of the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the
following findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit,
purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or
detract from the use of neighboring property or from
the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of
the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable and the
public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon
the logical, efficient, and economical extension of
public services and facilities, such as public water,
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
7 Attachment 4
5. The R -1 zoning is consistent with the current
development of the property.
Adopted this day of , 19 .
•
8
Mk
F
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendments and Rezonings
LOCATION: Radatz Avenue, east of White Bear Avenue
APPLICANT: City of Maplewood
DATE: December 11, 1989
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The City is proposing the following changes for the area on Radatz
Avenue and east of White Bear Avenue:
1. A land use plan amendment from RM, medium density residential
to RL, low density residential.
2. A rezoning from F, farm residential to R1, single dwelling
residential.
3. A rezoning from F, farm residential to R2, double dwelling
residential.
4. A rezoning from F, farm residential to LBC, limited business
commercial and a plan amendment from RM, medium density
residential to LSC, limited service commercial for a 1.01
acre parcel at 2836 White Bear Avenue.
These are shown on the maps on pages 6, 7 and 8.
BACKGROUND
January 16, 1984: The Maplewood Planning Commission considered a
Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment and a rezoning for the area
in question. The Planning Commission recommended that the land
use designation and zoning remain the same. The matter was never
heard by the City Council.
November 16, 1989: The City Council initiated a study by staff
of properties which have zoning and land use designations that
are inconsistent.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Plan Amendments
Plan amendments require no specific findings for approval. Any
amendment, however, should be consistent with the City's land
use goals and policies.
Rezonings
Section 36 -485 of the City Code requires the following findings
to approve a rezoning:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit,
purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or
detract from the use of neighboring property or from
the character of the neighborhood, and that the use
of the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable, and
the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon
the logical, efficient, and economical extension of
public services and facilities, such as public water,
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
DISCUSSION
The RM land use designation is inconsistent with the expected and
existing development of the properties proposed for change (shown
on the map on page 7). The properties that have been proposed for
the land use plan amendment are well established as single - family
• dwellings and are not expected to develop into medium density
residential. The proposed land use amendment to RL (shown on
page 7) and rezonings (shown on the map on pace 8) would make the
zoning and land use designations consistent with the expected and
existing development of these properties.
Most of the area in question is currently zoned F, farm residential
and has developed with single - family homes on one -half to two -
thirds acre lots fronting on Radatz Avenue and Fredrick Street.
These properties should be zoned R -1, single dwelling residential
to be consistent with the existing single - dwelling homes.
Along the south side of Beam Avenue are two areas that are
undeveloped that are planned for medium density residential.
These, however, are zoned F, farm residential. The RM land use
designation appears appropriate for the western parcel as it is
between the bank property and the existing duplexes and it fronts
a major collector street. The eastern parcel, however, appears
most appropriate for a single family home. As such, staff is
recommending that the existing area of R -2 zoning be expanded to
encompass the lot on the west side of the current area zoned R -2
as shown on the map on page 8. In addition, the parcel to the
east of the duplexes should be zoned R -1 and the Land Use Plan
amended to RL in anticipation of a single - family dwelling being
developed on the property. These changes will make the zoning
and land use designations consistent for these two properties.
2
Regarding the 1.01 acre parcel of land at 2836 White Bear Avenue,
the ultimate and best use for this property appears to be some
type of commercial development. This is because of the LBC zoning
on either side, the adjacent land use plan designations (SC and
LSC) and since it has 195 feet of frontage on White Bear Avenue.
As such, it appears that a LBC zoning and a LSC land use
designation appear the most appropriate for this property.
These changes are shown on the maps on pages 7 and 8.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Approve the resolution on page 9 which amends the land use
plan for portions of the area near Radatz Avenue east of White
Bear Avenue from RM, medium density residential to RL, low
density residential on the basis that:
a. The properties in question are developed with or expect
to develop with single- family homes which are
consistent with a RL land use designation.
b. There is no reason to believe that these properties will
develop into medium density residential in future.
2. Approve the resolution on page 10 to rezone the some of the
properties near Radatz Avenue east of White Bear Avenue from
F, farm residential to R -1, single dwelling residential based
on the findings required by ordinance and that R -1, single -
family dwelling residential zoning is consistent with the
S current development of the property.
3. Approve the resolution on page 12 to rezone the property
along the south side of Beam Avenue (west of 2030 and 2032
Beam Avenue) from F, farm residential to R -2, double dwelling
residential based on the findings required by ordinance and
that the R -2, double dwelling residential zoning is consistent
with the RM, medium density residential land use designation
for the property.
4. Approve the resolution on page 13 to rezone the property
at 2836 White Bear Avenue from F, farm residential to LBC,
limited business commercial based on the findings required
by ordinance.
5. Approve the resolution on page 14 to amend the land use plan
for 2836 White Bear Avenue from RM, medium density residential
to LSC, limited service commercial on the basis that:
a. The ultimate and best use for this property appears to
be commercial.
b. The surrounding properties are zoned and planned for
commercial development.
411 3
. REFERENCE
Existing Land Uses: single - family dwellings and two
undeveloped parcels each approximately one -half acre in size.
Surrounding Land Uses
North: Property zoned LBC (Maplewood State Bank) and Beam Avenue.
East: South of Radatz Avenue; Single- family dwellings in North
St. Paul.
North of Radatz Avenue; Fredrick Street and single- family
dwellings in Maplewood.
South: Lake Ridge Park Townhomes (zoned R3 -C).
West: Parcels zoned R -3 developed with four- plexes, an
undeveloped parcel on the northwest corner of White Bear
and Radatz Avenues zoned LBC and White Bear Avenue.
Planning
Low Density Residential (RL) - "This classification is primarily
designated for a variety of single- dwelling homes. An occasional
double dwelling may be allowed. The maximum population density is
14 people is per net acre" (page 18 -29).
Medium Density Residential (RM) - "This classification is
designated for such housing types as single - family houses on small
lots, two - family homes, townhouses, and mobile homes. The maximum
population density is 22 people per net acre" (page 18 -30).
Limited Service Commercial Centers (LSC) - Limited Service Centers
are defined as those providing specialized commercial services on
a neighborhood scale, limited as to quantity, location or
function, and planned in a quality environment.
The community must restrict these centers because of the effect on
surrounding properties, yet provide convenience to the citizens
with high standards of safety, amenities and aesthetics (p. 18 -17).
The limited service commercial center classification refers to
commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial
uses, department stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc.,
would be prohibited. Other land uses of a medium intensity
nature, such as gas sales with no vehicle repair or maintenance
and no more than two fuel pumps on a single island to serve up to
four vehicles at one time, may be permitted subject to meeting
certain performance standards as defined in the zoning code
(p. 18 -31).
• 4
Existing zoning: F, Farm Residential which allows single - family
dwellings, general farming, commercial greenhouses and nurseries.
Livestock raising, manufactured home parks and golf courses are
permitted with a conditional use permit and;
R -2, Double Dwelling Residential which allows single - family
dwellings, double dwellings, public parks and home occupations.
Golf courses and the storage of commercial vehicles are permitted
with a conditional use permit.
- Proposed zoning: R -1, Single Dwelling Residential which allows
single - family dwellings, public parks and home occupations. Golf
courses and the storage of commercial vehicles are permitted with
a conditional use permit;
LBC, Limited Business Commercial which allows offices, medical
clinics and daycare centers; and
R -2, Double Dwelling Residential.
Attachments
1. Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Land Use Map (Existing)
2. Proposed Land Use Plan Map
3. Property Line /Zoning Map
4. Plan Amendment Resolution (RM to RL)
5. Rezoning Resolution (F to R -1)
6. Rezoning Resolution (F to R -2)
7. Plan Amendment Resolution (2836 White Bear Avenue - RM to LSC)
8. Rezoning Resolution (2836 White Bear Avenue - F to LBC)
kenmemo24
5
.....
1 . ,• I It
.. *, ! -....1=1 • .. 16=7.4 _ rips 1 1 ---.1% •
11 - -411 *:- : '''., :',- Al H ii:`t ' 1 ..:.1 .1 ■ . 1 , •.III -. -.:, AI .::, -. .:Fr I% 'AI i ,. ' .- il . ' I . ±. , 11v2„..4 .-
c ‚4 n t y Ftd :•:;' Hi ,
.
4 1 :
major cosieG- = l y. .....t
.. F ,
1 AAA. v E
Ill . .1
‘4 - SC .' r ip 1
v:,,
...., a'or colleatoe
R
,
.... - -----, ...,.. al IIII MIL ' • • - - - ,,.. '.11.?" I ll . '''
AI- — -N -I -- .;,,. •, :, • a ,:,, f,r! .4, .1 t ..4 -.1 -I - I .. ....,,......
,. •
, el r i 1 uo ■ ,
-..
l'. (D.J....it .. , is l 1 l I
- I •-, .: i • !_namili
.. , .... 4' -1 illieromelji III"1.1 INS r. -i ' m a j .r • ia f
! co I; '- i4011i
1 . - I . $ A > 1 ' ,A ''.1‘1 '-‘:. -.: I . .1' - '11 - ; 1 ' '11 ' 1 ii 1 - .1.'''-lr.11:,
Lydia' -,' -- . -vow- 111 1111111111111111 MN
ii
, ..1
. - - — .-/•'- /11. 111111. 1
pa .0 - J. s ., . NNE 1 P
, ..,..-•,, i — : 01.1•0. 4 • „,, s „,-....... , • ..,,,
.-:' --- ----- ---- a
•--. — \ 1 u 10- ■ NZ 1 11111 IIIP .
_
.... u NI All
. 2 1
11 a at 01.:', ..i
B e - m mui ,
Ns ...t; a
,-,
• 1 P c! I firm ...1 ...inelle• witumir
___ :. zw- _ !tor -mot L A I
Ave i 1
r.,:: 11iliMiliffillilliglilllie:
2 01111111 IMMIlinUnillnillr
1111E11E - 211 il .-- -F.- -L- 4: it it !•;11 --v-. c- 1 x i.?is .' -IL ' 1 - - 1
a t
111
..
0 ii. • I. 4 , , i , 1 .
II 1111111111111111111M111 iir
R M
01 ' • Nal
pilirr 11111 1IfIfill r e i lrillaiii
OIMMemomuiii tionnomefflut r ..
;SWiall1111111111•1111 '. — — — — — — — ....... 11111111/8 „..
a , X Er 111M1111111111111111111111111111 11 4. t ,
...;. -. 11. 1111111111111111611111111111111111111111V•• r.rile- nal
Alm Allinr Ar ..t.
111111111111 E7" lif 0.1
zo.* Norl
,.. ettt-,_ -1:3 .
1111111111111111111 4/ 1110-r-i- Cc
a) co
< "E
•
t.._ .. c.)
ca
a) M
co .
a) .
\ ,
-... t .
MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD
‘ 4 () k
III/ LAND USE PLAN (E>u7ti•i6.--) N
6 Attachment 1
/
z:
1. I l 7 w'1 L! ! I I t'ed.�•-.t is a l .i r• w E.' ■ �;1' .4 17 171 t' s E: ' _" r
County Rd ' 11 '� , rna�vr coy ector �
D
t —
J .� l '.
� SC M A : 1 11
1
m ajor collector
4' ! min • -
a� Noodi wr - ipm ,, / .,,,, .,.,1._,. piEil .• - _ I ‘' L'. . 1 -- . / . . _ r`amil 1,1' • !
,-- co ,_, .
Lydia E: ■fivi Ili 1 r i o a- •J � RH 4 0 - u R L
.. , .. ,,..1 _._.... _ _ v
f i cr•-_,_,-- .f p I: 1* ;
+ // 1111 1-5--:- r � k �-_ . _ Be - m Ave _: _._.... I 131 IV IN . fag Yi1 a r o o` = :^+ , _
,r3�` '�""= - ..._� � i% %" `R- _ ' - ' . '9!!�' :;:� `i z1.1.7.17.7. SG tf 1 �� , .,_ to
e Y
n
_ 11 uuul ► �� 1!I7' �._
• , t , i LP 1 # 1 ' -
I - . i nunoIu . - .,..., - - - - �i,.• , •
r : _� , k ,, , 4
J 1 4,i, * 1
-. Y i �, cc
0 0)
c
1
,.. - 0
0
of .
. the •
\.
pRoposED 0
• LAND USE PLAN N
7 Attachment 2
11■4
•
s•■•
• •
• I •
: .
ss- PAA /A ,,„„ ••N I , <
jilt-, ' Cyr/ OF FIAPI.twOOP 1 • ; 0 1 1 1 e : 6-Li
• 11 - ' I? . s • 1 14 1 s • 1 n
& P ROBTJ Tli.
• .. !
• - -
125!.: 7: . ,, . , .• • .... .. ., ...K.% pc A m ?
' II ..1 n 0 4 :..
;.' mul '. ff' "-
\ s ,:;:::::K:: • -di:::ii;..,,,....• :,,,: 1 " . 11
..,. .:!...r :...:01 , .,:t: : :;::::::ii- , ...:111 . 1 ; - El 2 3 • S 6 7 II C =', in i '.4 ■ :
12..r , : i a • • • ,.., 4 " . :,,,--*11:. .1.i:::::::::';' ' '' ''''. w us us ■•• e A.' ro (11 9 1\ /,' 1
,.?.. ,, :',7,73",'Is .. • - -.-:::::ii,,,s- :::-:: - .1 , 1 (31 111 la, I 2 ( ,, 1 0m , 1
f;„3,; a - . • A .. I P,I•1•34. I 44.44 7,p1 . . 1 • . - ' ••• • n I , 1:
i • Ateit I . 41111 • tr ' : :':'-' '.',' '- ' FAL ,...
, 40:•;: ,„o.`:: lur
,,II • ...... • - 01 4,r11, $36 W. Er. AVE.ca-zt co - i te;,,i, ( -Iwif::. , . .:....4.,:.:.at ÷-, ..... - • • 1
, • •
_ ..:: 4 MAPLEVI
.* II 9 ...., • ... ms■ 4 1•91 .. . : AVE
• 6'. : i . 4.;i.4 .."., i." ::.!!.!!.....:?:',:•:..,.? '.:1 ow , j 0 I 4. •
mato a .1 :: i::::::::::::41:: :n:*, "111,, 5 fr : . 2 4 5 4 . r is t t
T.; 1 it "■.' 4 ;; Ti: W .. ......' ..:::.k::::;::.
m 5 u•s, su) w 1 z ',..
s - . ' 1111. ': ::: /:-...:::: , :' , : : 1::: . : ii .: :,. -:,:r ., . . . f t -- (X• 1:::: ,a 0.•!, ,..) (s., ..! cc , ,::
,,.. (,s 0. •s., ti. 3
•• la I 10 3 71 7 5.D.. as la
, Il
I I I
' ii -,,, v . .31 *. ''' ,"i ::.*:4i.:::::4;i::•,::::':,•*: i■iia:ii : :::: :3::: E • :'1 .• i■•■ :: ; : i' s Yii • ti :: : : : • ; I t 7. 7:4 •Al .• ' • - • •••• L±L_1
• " 4, a4.:: ' : -.•': .t..:.:.:77:::.:: f.:::.:::::::'1: iit va vs tv is van vs,Rstst.susitigUILAVZI-liVaituu Ea, IR ILIILELELELlill 9
s si Ns Is in um law 11 12 19 , .•...,:::: - . : : . :.::::::::::::*: , , ., , 7,, s , pa vi_. 1 .. .' - - - - '•'. c ., ' • , - . - ,
• ... .I 4 :.,•-•:.:,.;.:.:,,,,.: .. .:..... i4
■•:.:. : :.:-..: s 4A I 4..., - .
-•••.- If ii ••••••::::::::;...:•:::: ,..'::::':::: - a ..! a , - . = 1 .. L.,.1
I
i
,,,; i 4 . 1 6 it . .
.:: : : : ..i. : : : :,...+■.. ,:r...ii .. j > 1151f =
: ("' i.s.i'.....:,-.7.--: ,I1 .1. 1;1 <!.. I..1..! 1 , :::.1.! , s...p....”..:.. .....
st- ::::i::::::: ::::::::.,r:i4:::::4 ' - .. , - -a " - • - • .6ei" .,:■ r 1 . al ISS.1 . ii', GI r6i6i: ;
th, - - „,„,:: :•:.:.:.:.- :..,:...:,. 4.__. ' . 70: .. ,, . . 4 1-• 2.1 14 IS 1 i !, 11 17 all 1 ES 1011 1
, 1 1) 1 4 1 •
1 'I TO' (36 ‘ 101 ' fr.?" VIIIR ' ..: :::::::::::!:' :::::::::: .--st.::::.e. . . 2 s n r . 25 3 ,, o , - • . .1.
•■ 254::::::•::: ,:•:::::::::,. :::::::::, " 5 .., .. ... i'
lir, ..„6“.6.: .. 60....r.• ICC° I , ;! 0 ,.., I/ ,',1; : . ' • • • ., „ • ...•• ; -. ., ....
MZSADI ..,
IrrZ v ■-..:■:, --- i ,1 1. .......,.. — -,1:::::tt ::;:4t ::;ii- ; ,.!c).1 2 r ! (1!', -.......:::. ....: . .,... g.
• 1%. 1 1
t Neft •• " .-''"' !1 : 11;■1411.1. : . 41i1A' : li ' - :i4',3 .1 o I. .`i," . g" ' ...,, '. „2 - s • '' e"'' sz .4 9 • I * I
- ...kW 8.9
- r-L 27 '' r'. : .! ;' t 1 , :-11 :.? 1,...E.:". 1 s
i .
l libtei / i-3-, t! I . ■•', ?E '7'. ' l '' " ; .‘' :';(:) .!! -. ' • : ",: 1 , " ; . f' ....:!:.• • .. i : • ' S , .7.:.'t- - .!'s:-
a : u ,, st ...c u i. , ..,....-• , .,,,,, ; ., ..........„ :. - 2 i; ,
• : LB R C st it.-4=p4f. L . E GE .-.. K / ' ''' ,1 • 17" ::e '''' ;': s ; • '', l'I • '', . . 1
' '.g / r'g'
.7...-- : 3ft • • •• ... ••• ..,1 3 i d , z I ' 1 i t i ' i "• - ■' .. :5 , • ,..,, .- .. " " ' ..
OUTLOTt16 ■ ,1,'. -' , , `&‘ grii.D .'N-...... 4 , .....- 1 --/ i \` ''''• 7. :,' ; ' '
I ; ! .. .. ' t' :,. . B '9 .',.• . , ': .1 ____ . • :L 2: "-
: - ,'....." ..1, • , '3, •?.. ‘-' ,',,, " ..7 / ! ...4 , s i ■ ! 3
r a 11it ..- . . '.%\i'. .../ .9.. ...:I.....;. - '...
a IRO .:,„ . a I' I.L •
-;,..-...-:,.. ‘r) 7 . ,...-:: , ..... „. .... .. .1 1 .7 .
. S"
F 11 'w, „, :,,,,— ., :14;.\-A.- .
,r, ............„,,,: IE ,.) ,,-,V,. ,..2.3.6.... ......t.-
'T . 5 1.3s....
at ..., _,
a, 4. . % (I) ■ lk
....''-?-•'..
sss1 • :
c5 (3) i lis
\ 4B ., A •-••.......
• .2; li
1,Dc '4 . ...... 1•144.
2 (11
(1! f,
—=— .
;;
'4
. Z 0 ' V; ' IC
CZ i "/ -
.
1 f *4 1
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
, :::::.:.:.:.:....:::: i:),,„,,..D
R EZONO/VG-- F -r2 g N
c ro Z. BC Pro.
t e,,zopo. ED se.ezoni/N6 - r TO 4Z M
Iii 8 Attachment 3
PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION
•
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the
Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RM, medium density residential
to RL, low density residential for the following- described
property:
1979 -2015 Radatz Avenue; 1976 -2014 Radatz Avenue, and the
z North 1/2 of the East 175 feet of the West 495 feet of the
NW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 2, Township 29, Range
22.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as
follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing
on December 18, 1989 to consider this plan amendment.
Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to
law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said plan amendment be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan
amendment on , 1990. The Council considered
• reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City
staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis
of the following findings of fact:
1. The properties in question are developed with single -
family homes which area consistent with a RL land use
designation.
2. There is no reason to believe that these properties
will develop into medium density residential in the
future.
Adopted this day of , 1990
Attachment 4
9
REZONING RESOLUTION
IIM WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F,
f arm residential to R -1 single - dwelling residential for the
following- described property:
2855 -2869 Fredrick Street, 1979 -2069 Radatz Avenue; 1976-
2014 Radatz Avenue; the North 1/2 of the East 175 feet of
the West 495 feet of the NW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of
Sec. 2, Township 29, Range 22; and the South 1/2 of the West
120 feet of the NW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 2,
Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as
follows:
1. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on December 18, 1989. The Planning
Commission recommended to the City Council that said
rezoning be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
, 1990 to consider this rezoning.
Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to
law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
The Council also considered reports and recommendations
of the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the
following findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit,
purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or
detract from the use of neighboring property or from
the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of
the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable and the
public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon
the logical, efficient, and economical extension of
public services and facilities, such as public water,
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
10
5. The R -1 zoning is consistent with the current and
expected development of the property.
• Adopted this day of , 1990.
•
11
REZONING RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F,
farm residential to R -2 double- dwelling residential for the
following - described property:
The North 1/2 of the west 120 feet of the NW 1/4 of the NW
1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 2, Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as
follows:
1. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on Dececember 18, 1989. The Planning
Commission recommended to the City Council that said
rezoning be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
, 1990 to consider this rezoning.
Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to
law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
The Council also considered reports and recommendations
of the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the
following findings of fact:
• 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit,
purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or
detract from the use of neighboring property or from
the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of
the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable and the
public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon
the logical, efficient, and economical extension of
public services and facilities, such as public water,
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. The R -2 zoning is consistent with the RM, medium
density residential land use designation for the
property.
Adopted this day of , 1990.
12
REZONING RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F,
• farm residential to LBC, limited business commercial for the
following- described property:
2836 White Bear Avenue
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as
follows:
1. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on December 18, 1989. The Planning
Commission recommended to the City Council that said
rezoning be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
, 1990 to consider this rezoning.
Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to
law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
The Council also considered reports and recommendations
of the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the
following findings of fact:
• 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit,
purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or
detract from the use of neighboring property or from
the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of
the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable and the
public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon
the logical, efficient, and economical extension of
public services and facilities, such as public water,
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Adopted this day of , 19 •
Attachment 7
13
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the
Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RM, medium density residential
to LSC, limited service commercial for the following- described
property:
2836 White Bear Avenue
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as
follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing
on December 18, 1989 to consider this plan amendment.
Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to
law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said plan amendment be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan
amendment on , 1990. The Council
considered reports and recommendations from the
Planning Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
that the above- described plan amendment be approved as on the
basis of the following findings of fact:
• 1. The ultimate and best use for this property appears to
be commercial.
2. The surrounding properties are zoned and planned for
commercial development.
Adopted this day of , 1990.
Attachment 8
14