HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncilo Minutes MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Election of Vice - Chairman
DATE: January 2, 1981
The Planning Commission Rules of Procedure require that a vice - chairman be
elected by the Commission at the second meeting of each year. The current
vice - chairman is Duane Prew
V '
DATE: January 5, 1981
Maplewood
� TIME: January
P.M.
P /anniiig ' AGEND PLACE: 1380 Frost Avenue
(iO/ S, ir� LOCATION: Council Chambers
M - a- 1.. 1 .ly ` ., .
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call.
3. Approval of Minutes .
A. December 1, 1980
• 4. Approval of Agenda
5. Public Hearings
6. Visitor Presentations
7. Communications
8. New Business
A. Variance: 1279 Ripley Avenu• (Farrell)
B. Community Design Review Boars Discussion
C. Easement Vacation: Maple Gr-ens Third Addition
D. Street Vacations: Century a d McLean Avenues
E. PUD Revision: Connemara (Co dor Corp)
F. Plan Amendment Hearing Date
G. Critical Area Plan and Regulations
H. Annual Report
9. Old Business
10. Commission Presentations .
11. Staff presentations
12. Adjournment
& c`
MINUTES 0 THE MAPLEW00D PLANNING COMMISSION
7:30 P.M., Monday, January 12, 1981
Edgerton School Cafeteria, 1929 Edgerton St.
L
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL •
Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett Present
Commissioner Paul Ellefson Absent
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Absent
Commissioner William Howard Present
Commissioner Edward Kishel Present
Commissioner Joseph Pellish Present
Commissioner Duane Prew Present
Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present
Commissioner David Whitcomb
_ Absent
3. PUBLIC HEARING dole J�� r �° �
A. Comprehensive Plan Update
Chairman Axdahl read the notice of public hearing. He introduced
the members of the Planning Commission and the members of the Council
that were present. He gave backgroLnd on the existing Comprehensive
Plan which was adopted in 1973 and what action will be necessary to
adopt this Plan Update
Secretary Olson explained how the City was divided into neighborhoods.
The City has drawn up a land use plan for each neighborhood. He
gave a summary of the Plan including information on trail systems,
parks and proposed land designations. The land use plan is a general
guideline for development of property in Maplewood.
Mr. Schroeder, discussed the SC area adjacent to Rice and County
Road B. He suggested it be extended intp the area presently designed <x 4
Rh and then have the small triangular Rm parcel redesignated to Rh..
Carl Lien, commented on the land use designations and also the
zoning of property.
Ray Devine, 350 E. Skillman, is concerned with the property west
of McMenemy, north of Roselawn and south of Skillman. Presently the
property is just developed with NCR and the rest is open. He asked
for the definition of LSC. He was concerned with having a good
buffer zone for the single family homes.
1
1y
Dwight Jessup, 625 E. County Roa• B, commented gri
space for his neighborhood.
. . Ray Devine, 350 E. Skillman, ;; - -4. e* • e •ou e • • - • 9 -
e• - - 4. - . .. . a; . - a that
// k.s
i s - zdjaeeilt-ta-the-aaride-Ei ! P.-,, .tale.a.t-a.ad-its-dek,e+frpment-
A resident from County Road B Os pssed,with the Co 4proposed
ponding area near her Property no/h -f ("ovelv . i'0 , 4.0 3 byrs 0 7 44
Chairman Axdahl informed the peop e at the hearing if they wished to
add any further information it can be forwarded to the Commission or Staff.
Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing
Meeting adjourned at 7:45 P.M.
J.--
)..
5 r de, j4... / 416.(74/ irl k ed4 ■ / 0/ he,
gei ;1 wes i pail W 14e
ilyiewee 134 e 74.1
4 e
- Adtecd / 4 ,
."
i t
i l / I
ee,,, ;,- .444 /e.441-14- Ai 411,21
4 .1,/ , , x , 7 , A .,,,, 0 4 ,4-100 e", 7 1
,,
,,
- x
,
„„e 4 A eel,
I .4014, .
2
1-12-81
L i il i___ xa ,
..._
• /,
....,:-. - 3 5 ; C, 1 ' A 4 ' le MI
---
e, / dirt 4.Q 4- .
?
1
C
3? E516-i„,. Oft---m 7 th c ilt4,,,,.,-, 21 e41
/
J 1 „,,,,,,,,..„(— t4„-,,/t- .7#_,_, -,_„,--/,,,e ,,
kri/i.,„ 4,/ ( 56.,.. 7
• A ,,,,:,_ 7 dc
7 ea-- hirl a-Le,2,
lit --hr
7 inc_ -
—
0-7
Licak '7 74// 7f
•
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWO D PLANNING COMMISSION
7:30 P.M., Monday, January 12, 1931
Edgerton School Cafete ia, 1929 Edgerton St.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett Present
Commissioner Paul Ellefson Absent
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Absent
Commissioner William Howard Present
Commissioner Edward Kishel Present
Commissioner Joseph Pellish Present
Commissioner Duane Prew Present
Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present
Commissioner David Whitcomb Absent
Note: The tape recording of this meeting as not clear as the overhead projector
was placed next to the recorder
3. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Comprehensive Plan Update
Chairman Axdahl read the notice o' public hearing. He introduced
the members of the Planning Commissio and the members of the Council
that were present. He gave backg ound on the existing Comprehensive
Plan which was adopted in 1973 and wh.t action will be necessary to
adopt this Plan Update
Secretary Olson explained how the City was divided into neighborhoods.
The City has drawn up a land use plan for each neighborhood. He
gave a summary of the Plan including nformation on trail systems,
parks and proposed land designations. The land use plan is a general
guideline for development of property in Maplewood.
Mr. Schroeder, discussed the SC a ea adjacent to Rice and County
Road B. He suggested it be extended nto the area presently designed
Rh and then have the small triangular Rm parcel redesignated to Rh..
Carl Lien, commented on the land se designations and also the
zoning of property.
Ray Devine, 350 E. Skillman, is concerned with the property west
of McMenemy, north of Roselawn and so th of Skillman. Presently the
property is just developed with NCR a d the rest is open. He asked
for the definition of LSC. He was concerned with having a good
buffer zone for the single family hom-s.
1 1 -12 -81
Bob Schroeder discussed the SC are; adjacent to Rice Street and County
Road B. He suggested to extend the SC area to about 500 feet and then
designate the balance to Rh. Because of the topography of the property
this would be workable.
Carl Schroeder commented on the la d use designations and the zoning of
property.
Ray Devine, 350 E. Skillman asked ..bout the property west of McMenemy,
north of Roselawn and south of Skillma . The property is presently
developed with NCR. He was concerned ith having a good buffer zone to
the residential property. Fast food e.tablishments and gas stations
would not provide a good buffer zone.
Dwight Jessup, 625 E. County Road t asked why the property where the
store is at County Road B and McMenemy is designated RL. Also,why is Oerlein
Lake designated OS when all of the property is developed. Was this designation
on the 1973 Plan.
Ray Devine, 350 E. Roselawn Avenue asked if the open space around Roselawn
Park on County Road B could be expande' to the west. He felt that this property
was not developable, because it was too low to be served by sanitary sewer.
A resident from County Road discus.ed with the Commission a proposed ponding
area near her property, north of Count Road B and west of Arcade.
Secretary Olson informed her that it was part of the Maplewood Drainage
Plan.
Chairman Axdahl informed the peopl- at the hearing if they wished to add
any further information it can be forw:rded to the Commission or Staff.
Chairman Axdahl closed the public earing
4. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 7:45 P.M.
2
1 -12 -81
MINUTES 0 MAPLE OOD PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JANUARY 5, 1981, 7:30 P.M.
1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meeting t• order at 7:30 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Lester Axdahl 'resent (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett 'resent
Commissioner Paul Ellefson 'resent
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer 'resent
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny 'resent
Commissioner William Howard 'resent
Commissioner Edward Kishel 'resent
Commissioner Joseph Pellish 'resent
Commissioner Duane Prew 'resent
Commissioner Ralph Sletten 'resent
Commissioner David Whitcomb 'resent
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. December 1, 1980
Correct: Page 6, under "voting on the motion as amended:" ch4nge
second "Ayes" to "Nays - 1 ".
Commissioner Kishel,moved appro al of the minutes of December 1,
1980 as corrected.
Prew seconded 'yes - 9 .
'bstained - 2 (Chairman Axdahl and
ommissioner Ellefson)
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Barrett moved approval of the agenda as submitted
Commissioner Sletten seconded 'yes - all.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
7. COMMUNICATIONS
1 1 -5 -81
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Variance - 1279 Ripley Avenue (Farrell)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a lot area
and frontage variance to create two substandard lots. Staff is recommending
approval as outlined in their report.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment
on the proposal.
The applicant was present but indicated he had no further comments.
Commissioner Pellish questioned if every time there is a case similar
to the - 1978 case mentioned in the staff report, because the City took
action, if that is the way the Planning Commission will have to act.
Secretary Olson said the Commission will have to review each case
individually, look at how recent decisions were made on similar cases.
It is Staff's feeling Council was establishing a policy to follow in.
similar types of variance requests. They were giving direction that they
find this type of situation acceptable.
Commissioner Pellish said a variance approved in 1978 and another
one in 1980 just lends itself to a compounding situation.
Commissioner Prew moved the Planning Commission recommend to the Board
of_.Adjustments and Appeals approval of the requested variance based on the
followin
1. Council approved a similar variance for 1897 Birmingham Street in 1978.
2. There are two houses on 50 foot lots on this street.
3. The density in the Land Use Plan would not be exceeded.
4. The lot to the west is developed and, therefore, additional land cannot
be acquired.
Approval is subject to:
1. Certification that the existing structure will be five feet or more from
the proposed split line.
2. A deed restriction shall be recorded to run with the westerly lot, stating
that "prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan shall
be approved by the Maplewood City Engineer ".
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes 9
Nays 2 (Commissioners Pellish and Howard)
2 1 -5 -81
B. Community Design Review Board Discussion
Secretary Olson suggested this item be tabled until later in the
agenda when the Board is present
Commissioner Prew moved to this item until later in the meeting.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
C. Easement Vacation - Maple Greens Third Addition
Secretary Olson said this is a request for vacation of a sewer easement
in the Maple Greens Third Addition. Staff has recommended approval as out-
lined in their report. The applicant indicated he could not be at the
meeting, but was in agreement with the recommendation.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to
comment on the proposal.
Commissioner Kishel asked if it was necessary to remove any of the
sewer line in the easement.
Secretary Olson said the Engineering Department informed him it would
not have to be removed.
Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the
_City of the sanitar sewer easement vacation, based on the
fi ndi n max
g_ that i t �i s i n the i nterest tie p
o ib` i c, since the oI"d - `' i i s = no
longer used and the new one has been provided.
Approval is subject to the applicant dedicating Outlot C to the Cit as a
public right-of-way as requi red bpi the M orel i minar plat _a,oprova,
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
D. Street Vacations - Century and McLean Avenues
Secretary Olson said this is a request for vacation of Century and
McLean Avenue to allow development of adjacent properties as one site,
less the U -Haul parcel. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in
their report.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to
comment on the proposal.
Bob Soules, Real Estate Department of 3M Company, said they are
marketing the property together with Schochs, therefore, access would
not be a factor in this request. The Schochs would be moving from the
property. He said that the owner of Toby's Landing did change hies access
so it would not be used as a boat launching site.
Commissioner Kishel said he was concerned with leaving U -Haul landlocked
if that portion of Century is vacated.
3 1 -5 -81
Secretary Olson said the easement is to guarantee them access.
Commissioner Fischer said the Commission will have to consider all
uses the right -of -way was used for before vacation of property.
Secretary Olson said the right -of -way is not lake access, it is
street right -of -way.
Commissioner Pellish said Oakdale is proposing to vacate the eastern
portion of the Century (Geneva) right -of -way. Their portion of the
right -of -way would abut the lake.
Commissioner Kishel asked if the 3N company would be using the property
for their development or would it be sold.
Mr. Soules said it would be sold to an outside developer. This was a
remainder piece after the realignment of 120 by the Highway Department.
Philip Schoch, said he did take a count of the cars using the Century
right -of -way today and there were 10
Commissioner Ellefson asked the applicant if they had discussed a
combined development of the Schoch property, 3M property and portions of
Toby's Landing property, plus the vacated street.
Mr. Soules said yes they have discussed it, but no design has been
established.
Commissioner Ellefson moved the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council the vacation of the McLean rih.tof- way_ east f
Trunk Highway 120, subject to retention of a storm sewer easement over the north
one -half of the right -of- way.,,,.
Approval is recommended on the basis that:
1. Improvement of the right -of -way would be cost - prohibitive and not in the
public interest.
2. McLean Avenue is not needed and its presence unnecessarily restricts
the development potential of abutting properties.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - 9
Abstained - 2 (Chairman Axdahl and
Commissioner Whitcomb)
Commissioner Ellefson moved the Planning Commission recommend to the
Ci t Counci 1 the_ of _t tu
e Cenry Avenue r� ht of way ,frgT:Iie 94
North service road to a ° '
of nt 845 feet north subject to: " µ °
1. The City of Oakdale vacating the east 33 feet of the subject right -of -way.
2. City Engineer approval of a private roadway easement over the existing
street east of the U -Haul property, for joint use and maintenance by
adjacent properties located in Oakdale and Maplewood.
4 1 -9 -81
3. Combination of the 3M and Schoch properties and removal of the single
family dwelling.
4. Retention of a utility easement along the entire right -of -way to service
NSP's transmission lines (Easement to be defined by NSP).
5. Retention of a 30 foot wide storm sewer easement along the north half of
the McLean Avenue right -of -way and 30 feet north of the easterly extension
of McLean Avenue center line to the east line of Century Avenue.
6. Conditions must be satisfied within one year or conditional approval is
null and void, unless renewed by Council action.
Conditional approval is recommended on the basis that:
1. Development of adjacent properties would be consistent with the access
requirements of City Code.
2. Retention of the right -of -way is not necessary or in the public interest.
3. The presence of the right -of -way unnecessarily restricts the development of
adjacent properties.
Commissioner Barrett seconded
Commissioner Kishel said he would prefer to see how the complete
parcel will develop before granting a vacation, therefore would be
abstaining on the vote.
Commissioner Pellish said he would like the opinion of U -haul as
to the use of an easement for their access.
Voting: Ayes - 3 (Commissioners Ellefson, Barrett,
Sletten)
Nays - 3 (Commissioners Prew, Pellish,
Fischer)
Abstained - 5 (Commissioners Axdahl,
Kisehl,Whitcomb,Hejny,Howard)
Motion fails
The Commission discussed the vacation of Century Avenue as petitioned by
the applicants.
Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning__Commi,s_sion recommend to thy,
_City Counci 1 the v_acati on_ at
of Century Avenue _right of wad! from thenorth l i ne
of U -Haul property to a point approxime) 7O0 feet north subject_ to:
1. The City of Oakdale vacating the east 33 feet of the subject right -of -way
2. Combination of the 3M and Schoch properties and removal of the single
family dwelling
5 1 -5 -81
3. Retention of a utility easement along the entire right -of -way to service
NSP's transmission lines (Easement to be defined by NSP)
4. Retention of a 30 foot wide storm sewer easement along the north half of
McLean Avenue right -of -way and 30 feet north of the easterly extension
of McLean Avenue center line to the east line of Century Avenue.
5. Conditions must be satisfied within one year or conditional approval is
null and void, unless renewed by Council action.
Conditional approval is recommended on the basis that:
1. Development of adjacent properties would be consistent with the access
requirements of City Code.
2. Retention of the right -of -way is not necessary or in the public interest.
3. The presence of the right -of -way unnecessarily restricts the development
of adjacent properties.
Commissioner Ellefson seconded Ayes - 4 (Commissioners Ellefson,
Prew, Pellish, Sletten)
Nays - 0
Abstained - 7 (Commissioners Kishel,
Fischer, Whitcomb, Barrett, Axdahl,
Hejny, Howard)
Motion carries
Commissioner Fischer moved the Commission review item 8 B at this time.
Commissioner Pellish seconded Ayes - all.
B. Community Design Review Board Discussion
Secretary Olson said the Board has requested a meeting with the Planning
Commission with regard to the future of the Board and what role the Planning
Commission may play.
Garry Sjolander, Chairman of the Board, said the Board wished the opinions
of the Commission on the recommendations of Staff. He asked if the Commission
would be in agreement of taking on the additional responsibilities of design
review of projects. The Board did interview an applicant at their meeting
and are recommending his appointment. The Board is recommending the Council
amend the ordinance to allow additional terms of the Board members. The
Board is also asking for suggestions from the Commission as to how to inform
the public there are vacancies on the Board.
Commissioner Fischer suggested those applicants who applied for a position
on the Commission be asked if they would be willing to serve on the Board
Secretary Ekstrand said those applicants were contacted in the past.
6 1 -5 -81
Commissioner Fischer said she has always been a strong proponent of
the Review Board because of the already heavy load that the Planning
Commission has.
Commissioner Pellish suggested contacting various schools and
colleges to see if there would be some students that would be interested
in serving on the Board.
Commissioner Prew moved that the Plan min_o Commission recommend to the
Cif Council that the_v defer any thoughts of di sbandi ng te,rommun i ty.
Design Review Board at this time in lieu thereof a review of the ordinance
to _amend i t i n a_,wa that would allow ,,co,nti,nued act Sri ty._._b_y_ resients__of
..
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - all.
E. PUD Revision - Connemara (Condor Corporation)
Secretary Olson said this is the same request the Commission reviewed
in June of 1980 to amend the PUD permit for Connemara to allow the
construction of a fourth building. He reviewed the history of the project.
Staff is recommending denial of the proposed amendments. Staff has
also included a report which lists compliance of the Council conditions
for the PUD and information on densities of apartments
Jim Riley, President, Condor Corporation, p ion, said by allowing a fourth
building, there would be no adverse affect on the community. None of the
present owners of the two buildings have objections to the proposal. Also
there has been no neighborhood opposition to the proposal. A fourth
building is allowed under the present PUD if certain density requirements
are met. He believes they have met the requirements. He commented on
the density figures used by the Land Use Plan. If the future densities
do increase, they will increase in all types of housing. Because of
soil conditions on the site, it would not be economical to build one
building on the site at a time. He feels the site is unique in the City.
There would be no traffic problem in the area as there is a roadway
(Lower Afton) which is not presently being used at capacity. There
also would be no problem with fire protection and sewer and water. Because
of the property - in the area consisting of park land, and City work farm
and ponding area, the density would not be substantially increased.
The land would not be used any heavier on the second two buildings as
the first two. For these reasons, he asks for reconsideration.
Commissioner Fischer said as there is objections to having a fourth
building because of the excessive density for the he Rm land use classification
the property presently has, the only way the fourth building could be
constructed and be consistent with the Plan would to have a Plan change to
Rh. She asked if the applicant has pursued a Plan change on the property.
Secretary Olson said no.
Commissioner Fischer said the applicant has indicated if approval of
the fourth building is given it would not have affect elsewhere. She thought
it would as far as setting a precedent in density change requests.
7 1 -5 -81
Commissioner Pellish asked if condition #6 would be complied with as
to providing for moderate income housing as called for in the PUD
Mr. Riley said they have provided for anyone to purchase their units.
They presently range from $50,000 to $80,000.
Commissioner Pellish said there should be low and moderate income
people occupying the units or the applicant should ask for a waiver of
the conditions if it is no longer valid. According to the information
staff received, if there would be low and moderate income people in
the building there would be more people per unit.
Commissioner Whitcomb moved that the Planning Commission r ecome
m nd
denial of the proposed amendments, on the basis h t:
1. The applicant has not demonstrated that he is in compliance with
the existing conditions.
2. The City's Land Use Plan was adopted in September, 1973, after a consider-
able amount of discussion, public hearings, and citizen input. It has since
been the basis for all of the City's planning for sewer, water, storm
water control, parks, streets, and population projections.
3. The Land Use Plan is based on maximum rather than actual densities.
While the present densities in the first two buildings may be lower than
those projected in the Land Use Plan, densities may increase with changing
birth rates and living patterns.
4. The fourth building would substantially exceed the number of units allowed
by the City's Land Use Plan.
5. Since the 1973 Land Use Plan was adopted after the 1972 PUD permit, the
City Council may reconsider the permit, based on conflicts with the City
Plan.
6. Since no building permits have been issued or foundations constructed,
there is no significant vested interest in a fourth building.
7. The Land Use Plan is the basis for determining maximum densities in all
multiple zoning districts in the City.
8. For the above reasons, denial of a fourth building is in the best interests
of the public welfare.
Commissioner Pellish seconded Ayes - all.
F. Plan Amendment Hearing Date
Chairman Axdahl asked the Commission if they wished to set a hearing date
for the Votel request.
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting an RLE designation.
8 r ("),
Commissioner Fischer moved to establ ish_ a _heari n�_date : for Februar 16,
19- 8s
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
G. Critical Area Plan and Regulations
Associate Planner Johnson said the revisions are in response to
Metropolitan Council and Environmental Quality Board comments. Staff is
recommending approval of the revisions.
Chairman Axdahl asked if the development restrictions would be applied
to any other property within the City.
Secretary Olson said no, this would be just for the Critical Area
as designated by the Metropolitan Council.
Commissioner Kishel moved that the P1lanning. Commission recommend ,to the
Ci ty .Counci 1 adoption of the proposed revisions to _the, Cri tt cal Area P1 an
and Regulations
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - 10
Abstained - 1 (Commissioner Ellefson)
Commissioner Ellefson said he was concerned with leaving land un'eveloped
and the possibility of "wild fire" and the possibility of various di
i
eases
which could more easily spread in a wooded area and eliminate specie of
trees.
H. Annual Report
Commissioner Prew_moved_ the_ Planning _Corrrniss_i_a
on_nnual report „b
forwarded to the City_council� for their,_review.
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
9. OLD BUSINESS
10. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
11. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
12. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 10:35 P.M.
9 1 -5 -81
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
7:30 P.M.,MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 1981
Weaver School, 2135 Birmingham St.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett Absent
Commissioner Paul Ellefson Present
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Absent
Commissioner William Howard Present
Commissioner Edward Kishel Absent
Commissioner Joseph Pellish Present
Commissioner Duane Prew Present
Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present
Commissioner David Whitcomb Absent
3. PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Axdahl introduced the Commissioners and the Council present
at the meeting. In 1976 the Legislature mandated that all Cities would
update their Comprehensive Plans. The City has prepared an update,
therefore, public hearings are presently being held.
Secretary Olson said the Comprehensive Plan covers capital
improvements, housing programs, parks and recreation and land use.
He explained the Commission has divided the City into 13 different
neighborhoods. Each neighborhood has its own land use plan, street
plan etc. He explained what each land use designation was and what
type of development would be permitted in each category. He reviewed
the changes that have been made to the land use plan for the Plan
Update. He explained the difference between zoning and land use
planning.
Chairman Axdahl asked for comments on the plan.
Marilyn Vars, 1140 Beam Avenue, questioned why the Plan was not changed
for her neighborhood to reflect existing development. She asked why lots
with homes on them are designated for LSC. Also, she questioned the designation
of Rm for the area at the northeast of Kohlman Lake. This could permit
smaller lots, development more dense and consequently, the run -off to Kohlman
Lake more sizable. She urged that area be designated Residential Low Density.
Also, several Minor Collector Streets have now been designated Major
Collector Streets. She realized if County Road D is closed to Highway 61,
there would still have to be access for emergency. An alternate plan would
be to provide that service through a frontage road along 61.
1 1 -26 -81
Roger Anitzbergen, 1979 Castle Avenue, he said his property is presently
zoned for single family, the Plan update now designates it for Residential
High Density. He asked for the procedure to change it to Residential Low
Density.
Secretary Olson said the property along Castle is zoned R -1, F, and some
commercial at the interchange of White Bear and Castle. Mr. Anitzbergen's
suggestion will be considered by the Planning Commission in March.
Chairman Axdahl said if anyone wished to present a written statement, it
would be accepted and included as part of the record.
Gerald House , 1840 Prosperity, said he may wish to make a comment later.
Lydia Olson,2005 E. County Road C, said her property is designated for
open space on the Plan update and would suggest it be changed to Residential
Low Density.
Bob Hajicek, 1700 E. County Road D, said the LSC area has been changed.
An area by Maplewood Plaza is designated as LSC and is actually Service
Commercial. He also asked how flexible the lines would be for the
different land use areas. He questioned if the new Service Commercial area
could be extended to the east by about 50 feet or 100 feet as he does own
some property adjacent to Ariel that he would like to develop for offices.
There is also a parcel that is designated Residential High Density that
extends to the railroad tracks. He questioned how appropriate residential
development would be when the rest is commercial. He would like to see
Diversified Center extended to those properties along the freeway.
He asked if it would be necessary to have a hearing before the Metro
Council for a Plan change once it has been adopted.
Secretary Olson said the Metropolitan Council is now in the process
of deciding how amendments will be handled. The latest proposal would
have the Met Council holding hearings on amendments that would have an
impact on regional facilities, i.e. regional park, interchange.
Donald Christiansen, 1811 E. County Road C, asked if the zoning
would be adopted to comply with the Land Use Plan,
Secretary Olson said once the Land Use Plan is adopted, the next step
would be for the Planning Commission to review and try and update the
Zoning Ordinance. After that point, the Commission would have to review
neighborhoods to look at areas that would have to be rezoned to bring
them into conformance with the Land Use Plan.
Mr. Christiansen suggested rather than applying an Open Space designation
to property, he would rather see it designated to Residential Low Density.
If the City cannot purchase property that is designated Open Space,
would have to permit the developer to build on it.
Secretary Olson said there are presently two ways of insuring Open
Space, one is through negotiations with a developer to cluster development
on property and preserve the wetlands or low lands open space area.
Secondly, is to purchase the property.
2 1-26-81
Mr. Christianson said in 1976 the Legislature also passed a law saying
communities have to have a Shoreline Ordinance. He suggested this be
incorporated with the Land Use Plan to help protect the Open Space.
Secretary Olson said the Plan is a guideline and the zoning ordinance
is the legal instrument for enforcement of development restrictions.
The proper place for the Shoreline Ordinance would be in the Zoning Code.
The designation of Open Space in the Plan makes the City's intent clear
as to how they would like to have property develop.
Paul Lowery, 1580 Grandview, asked the need for an interchange between
Highway 61 and White Bear Avenue on Highway 36. He asked if the location
of the over pass is definite.
Secretary Olson said there is flexibility. The Highway Department is
not presently planning any construction, therefore the exact location is
not set.
Mr. Lowery also asked if there is construction or work being done on
to the Hazelwood School as to conversion to hospital facilities.
Commissioner Sletten said the hospital structure is proposed for the
north side of Beam
Secretary Olson said St. John's has shown interest in it, but plans
are tentative. The Hazelwood School will be used for community service
programs.
Audrey Hed, 1957 Castle, indicated she was not aware of any previous
public hearings for the 1973 zone change. She asked if the
Commission worked off maps, or actually viewed the property when determining
the zoning.
Chairman Axdahl said the notice sent for 1973 was for the Comprehensive
Plan hearings. Property owners are notified of zone changes.
Mrs. Ned said if the property would develop to High Density, it would
result in a traffic problem at Ariel and Highway 36. She thought White
Bear Avenue should be straightened out before doing anything else in the
area. She wishes the area to stay Low Density.
Commissioner Prew said if the residents of this area wish to have the
property designated Low Density, they should make this a matter of record
with letters to the City.
John Newell, 1690 White Bear Avenue, concerned with the LSC proposed
area north of Highway 36, west of White Bear Avenue and south of the
new Gervais alignment. Most of the buildings that are in the area would
better be designated BW area. There is considerable warehousing, a
utility which would better be described by the BW and would request that
change.
Diane Verploegh, 2951 Furness, suggested the park property should be
extended to White Bear Avenue to preserve the pond . She did not wish
to see an office building constructed on that property.
3 1 -26 -81
Eldon Brandt, 2000 Adolphus Street, said he was interested in the
property adjacent to I -35E. There has been proposals for development
of the property and was asking if there is a new proposal for
development.
Secretary Olson reviewed past actions on the property. The
present proposal is very similar to the original warehouse proposal.
Mr. Brandt indicated he would like to be notified of the court
hearing date.
Stan Westlin, owner of a parcel of property at the intersection
of Highway 36 and White Bear. He suggested a higher density for the
property 300 feet south of County Road C by the Open Space area.
Mrs. Malty Willenbring, 1948 Adolphus, said there are 12 homes that
adjoins 11 acres proposed for development along I -35E. They would
rather not see warehousing on the property.
Mrs. Joseph Hollenkamp, 1984 Adolphus, she did not want the
property along I -35E designated as LSC.
Meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.
4 1 -26 -A1
, A il
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Revenue Note Financing
APPLICANT: Maplewood Business Center Partners
LOCATION• I -35E and Roselawn (see enclosed maps)
OWNER: D. W. Fourre, J. D. Voight, and R. C. Reiling
PROJECT: Roselawn Center
DATE: January 28, 1981
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
A Request
Preliminary approval for tax exempt mortgage revenue financing in the amount of
$3,900,000.
Proposed Land Use
An office - service - warehouse development consisting of multiple use modules for
tenant lease.
Specifically, the project will consist of:
1. Four buildings divided into over 40 individual office or service commercial units
2. A total building area of 104,700 square feet
3. 250 full -time and 50 part -time jobs
4. Projected annual sales and payroll of $12 and $4.5 million, respectively
5. Estimated construction start for March 1981 with completion March 1983
BACKGROUND
Site Description
1. The site is irregular in shape and 11.36 acres in area. There are only two
means of access:
a. a 33 foot wide easement to Roselawn Avenue over the adjacent property to the
south, and
b. A 40.6 foot wide public right -of -way to Adolphus Street. r
2. Existing land use: Undeveloped; used only for motorcycle trails.
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: A vacant seven acre parcel owned by the Board of Water Commiss oners.
This parcel is planned for open space on the City Land Use Plan and zo ed
F, Farm Residential. There are several wetlands on this property.
Northwesterly: Sandy Lake. This is a lime bed owned by the Board of Water
Commissioners.
Westerly: Single dwelling homes fronting on Adolphus Streit.
Southerly: A 1.05 acre parcel owned by the Minnesota Highway Department and planned
as a 12 acre foot storage pond.
Past Action
8- 16 -79: The Planning Commission recommended approval of a special use permit for.
a PUD on the basis that the proposal "is of a limited nature and satisfied the
intent of-the LSC designation for the site"
9- 13 -79: Council denied the applicant's request for a PUD on the basis of
insufficient access to the site
3 -6 -80: Council denied the applicant a rezoning from F, Farm Residence to M-1,
Light N(anufacturing
4- 18 -80: The City of Maplewood was served notice that the Applicants had initiated
District Court proceedings to over turn Council's denial. A court hearing has
not been scheduled.
Planning Considerations
1. The site is planned for_LSC, Limited Service Commercial. Office and
industrial parks are included in this designation. _
2. The site is F arm Residence.
3. Section 911.010 states that: A Special Use Permit may be issued to any district
for a planned unit development.
4. Mortgage Revenue Note Eligibility Criteria:
A. The project shall be compatible with the overall development plans of the
City, including the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and Community Design Review
Board standards
B._ The project shall not require a significant amount of public expenditures
for City improvements such as roads, sewers, and watermains
C. The project shall involve an existing business that the City:wishes to
expand or a new business which the City wishes to attract:
1. Existing Business Criteria
Any expansion, relocation, or rehabilitation of an existing business
2
2. New Business Criteria
a. Offers significant new employment, opportunities, based Upon the
nature of the use, on a year around basis, or
b. The project involves the rehabilitation of a vacant or scheduled
to be vacated strucutre, or
c. The proposed location is within a designated development or redevelop-
ment target area, and
fi
d. Possesses a low potential for creating pollution.
D. The number of businesses of the same general nature in the area of the -
proposed project shall be considered in determining the need for commercial
revenue note financing.
E. The note shall be for an issue of not less than $300,000
F. Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval.
Financial Considerations
The applicant has signed an agreement to pay all costs involved in the review and
financing of the proposed project. Commercial Revenue Notes do not constitute
a charge, lien, or encumbrance upon any property of the City, except the project
and would not be a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers, but
are payable from sums to be paid by the applicant.
Analysis
The proposal is consistent with the mortgage revenue note eligibility criteria
adopted by Council. The following is a discus n of a projec re a Ive`lh each
_ criterion (refer to Item 5 under Planning Considerations for the criteria)
A. The project is compatible with the overall development plans of the City.
In the past, Stawand the Planning Commission have recommended approval of
the PUD. Council, however, denied the PUD on the basis of insufficient
site access. If Council still contends that the PUD is incompatible with the
City's development plans, Mortgage Revenue Note financing should not be
approved.
B. No expenditure is required for City improvements.
'- C. This development would allow small business who otherwise may not be able to
afford their own facilities, an opportunity to establish or_-expand, adding `-
i
to Maplewood's tax base and employment opportunities. a.
-
i •
2a) Significant part and full time employment opportunities will be
offered on a year- around basis.
2d) The project has the potential of generating excessive ci
pollution from truck traffic. If the court orders approval of the
1
project, the special use permit should require noise abatement related
conditions.
D. No other com l of this nature exists in Maplewood. Names of sp cific
enants are not availab a at this time.
E. The request is in excess of $300,000.
R.. The Applicant has indic -4 tiat construction is scheduled to begin in
March 1981, provided . cout't .ettlement is reached by that time.
Recommendation
Preliminary approval of mortgage revenue note financing in the amount of
provided:
1. An out -of -court settlement is reached which includes noise abatemen -
2,, Construction is begun within 1 year of preliminary approval,. unless Council
approves a renewal.
Approval is recommended on the basis that:
1. Mortgage Revenue Note eligibility criteria would be met
2. This program is discretionary and should not be given if not in the City's interest.
Enclosures:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
4
.
•
58
1 36,
CO. RD. " �:1:
�L :.ARK AvE ' ; '�1 . ei vI KING -
I LITTLE CANADA u v' LAURIEID . JJ J ? _
JI COUNTY R•A. gh �
V) ¢ W Z rY
J m Q
I V v BUR>GE AV.
Q N
H �_
7 z ELDRIDGE m r y LDRIDGEI AV
Sandy._ , I a ..,
Q- ` 1� y y 11.0 w avE a .. CB EL
0 Z �_ Loke ` I�SKIJ LL MA AVE. m 58
_ + J M4N
V � \ a rSKiLL 3 W KE hr: C •D Li
� t rV O AVE .nl ct
1 i r o > �: — I L vI M. VERNON AVE ¢ m M
J 0 _ r p c [L
ON IDOWNS AvE. ni a w w z o vENCN rIN
ROSELAWN a I .N o - -I W W � of �� .
I 1 — AVE. w a- u -"I L A 'k \
i s r I
'A� i3: LLWOOD AV. O ' IBE LWOOD AVE. w 1 41. �/
�v. BEL Lx WOOD I�
'�I t o 1 '
ii % ✓� S UM AVE.a . '— 1 :I ,J lL
.. FEN TON AVEQ • a a. �.
O Z p
z /
j :.:. ... o = C tsl a h y RIPLEY AVE i �
L — . - I H r Y - .7 I ' Z 1..: C J I �.
_ N 1 1 0 J W = W � �11��
> !KINGS T ON u z o ~ Ra
, :::::... .. J w J ' ` ,� GP a ZO ¢ m y KING AVE r1 JIcE I 1 AVE . t p
u < m 38 I 4 o ,� w
n nh._ — 11 -mrI1•li n II -- 7
•
5 z
• s
Maplewood Business Center Partners
PETITIONER LOCATION MAP -
. DATE
Revenue Note
REQUEST SCALE PG.
.) ________ .
1 , . �
•
Z
1 L _ ; ` Q 11.
- - -- - - - - - - -� ' - - -- - - — - -- S�C'IL - •• ,N = = --
,
/
. . . .
t
,o ,t1.
dt
<. -k 0
C . � _
7S 't 4 _ 7 _ I •
f 1 1 ,�
`' c - 1 f (�
IF, I - 7 ji 1,.. 4
. 1 0
� ,, ' , '
' _
7 1 ' —
-1s 1
1 2
,- ? I N 1 r
- - � - - j1 r 1 `� 'i 1 1 fl... rz , ,-, _ _
(6 1
�s1 � = 1 s lb
1 <
I fl ' I 1 Q ...,\I :
1 1
„ r, l :../ 1 �1c S' 4� ' ' y • . ; 1 1 {
7 rl J l � 2 4 t �y /
1
•.^. 36 _,� 1�iCf'", ' H11a /�`'[' . p. 7...4 1 _b __ __.Z..
It f •r i . . • .l •••• I ...,...l lc , 1 w. 1 - t .__ __._. _ _. _.... _ � .— __.___
■
Maplewood Business Center Partners PROPERTY LINE MAP
PETITIONER - - DAT;
Revenue Note
REQUEST SCALE PG.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1981, 7:30 P.M.
1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett Present
Commissioner Paul Ellefson Absent
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Absent
Commissioner William Howard Present
Commissioner Edward Kishel Present
Commissioner Joseph Pellish Present
Commissioner Duane Prew Absent
Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present
Commissioner David Whitcomb Present
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. January 5, 1981
Correct: Page 5, voting on the motion, correct the spelling of "Kishel
Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the minutes of January 5, 1981
as corrected. ----
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
B. January 12, 1981
Commissioner Fischer moved to table the minutes of January 12, 1981
until the next meeting.
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
C. January 26, 1981
Commissioner Howard moved approval of the minutes _ of January 26, 1981
ds presented..
Commissioner Pellish seconded Ayes - 5
Abstained 3 (Commissioners Kishel, Barrett
and Whitcomb)
1 2 -2 -81
1
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the agenda as submitted.
Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes - all.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
7. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Mobile Home Report
Secretary Olson said if anyone would wish a copy of the report he
would send it out.
Chairman Axdahl said the Commission received a letter of appreciation
from Knowlans for the help in the reconstruction of their store.
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Revenue Note - Maplewood Dental Specialties
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting revenue note financing
for $300,000 for a medical office building on Cope Avenue. Staff is recommending
approval as outlined in their report.
Bob Jensen, the applicant was present, and indicated he would answer questions.
moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Commissioner
ouncilprelirni m
narryapproval of the tax exempt mortgage revenue note financing
,� - �. fi n. ....arm 1 . ..:..
in the amountof $300,000� on the_ staf'�s_,anal,ysis__._ pprova"I" is subject to:
1. Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval.
2. Approval of a special exception by the City Council and approval of site and
building design plans by the Community Design Review Board.
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
B. Revenue Note - Maplewood Business Center Partners
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting preliminary approval for
tax exempt mortgage revenue financing in the amount of $3,900,000. Staff is
recommending approval as outlined in their report.
Commissioner Pellish said he thought if the proposal met the Revenue Note
Criteria, that was sufficient as a finding for a recommendation.
Commissioner Barrett asked if noise abatement considerations should be
included in a recommendation.
2 2 -2 -81
Secretary Olson said if an out of court settlement is reached, one of
the conditions included would be the noise abatement considerations. This
is included as one of the criteria for revenue note financing - low potential
for creating pollution.
Commissioner Barrett said he thought it should be reworded to "requirements"
rather than "considerations°
Commissioner Howard asked why the first proposal was denied by Council
Secretary Olson said the Council felt there was not sufficient access.
Access to.the site is the same They felt the turning radius was inadequate for
trucks to get around within the site.The Council may wish to re- evaluate their
position with regards to the Court settlement and decide what will be in the
best interest of the City.
Commissioner Howard asked how this operation would differ from the one
located at Highway 61 and 36. Will there be manufacturing at this site?
Secretary Olson said there may be some light manufacturing at this site.
The only change in this plan from the previous one is the site plan, there
are four buildings proposed.
Don Bachmeyer, applicant, said he would be glad to answer any questions
the Commission may have. He said their project will be designed for uses
as small as 1500 square feet. They are designing their buildings to give
more of an office facade rather than the industrial /warehouse look.
They are proposing each use to have 50% office and 50% warehousing in the
back. The project has been reduced by about 4000 feet.
Commissioner Whitcomb moved _that at the. gg,,,,, j„ , r q�d i
the Ci ty_Counci 1 Jarel imi nary,_ ap royal of mortga revenue„ note fi na ina i n
the amnount QLil,a. mil l i y teLiha, t ge :
1. An out -of -court settlement is reached which includes noise abatement
requirements
2. Construction is begun within one year of preliminary approval, unless
Council approved a renewal.
Commissioner Sletten seconded
Commissioner Pellish questioned why it is not mentioned in the motion
that the proposal does meet the revenue note criteria.
Commissioner Whitcomb felt that the requirements are met unless otherwise
stated in the recommendation.
Commissioner Pellish moved an amendment to include the followin findings.
a
1. Mortgage Revenue Note eligibility criteria would be met.
2. This program is discretionary and should not be given if not in the City's
interest.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - 7
Nays - 1 (Commissioner Whitcomb)
3 2 -2 -81
Commissioner Barrett asked what happens to this preliminary approval
if there is no settlement in the case.
Secretary Olson said the preliminary approval would be null and void
Voting on the motion as amended: Ayes - 7
Nays - 1 (Commissioner Barrett)
C. Code Amendment - R -E District
Secretary Olson said this is a proposal to amend the City's Zoning
Code to establish a Residential Estate (R -E) District. The proposed
previously.
as presented to the Commission
amendment is the same p p
Chairman Axdahl asked if there were buildable lots existing,
would they remain buildable.
Secretary Olson said yes.
Commissioner Howard moved the. Pl „an „n „„na CQmml „pri, re, ,omme,nd,,, ,g ,th
C .1Q.4lDe? 1 pproval of the Residential Estate D1 stri ct as outlined
the,staf re2.,ort dated January 15�
Commissioner Pellish seconded Ayes - all.
Commissioner Fischer said she was concerned that people would purchase
these larger lots with the intention of using the property for both a
residence and to operate a home occupation from the site.
D. White Bear Lake Plan Review
Secretary Olson said the White Bear Lake Land Use Plan appears generally
consistent with Maplewood's Plan. Staff is recommending their comments be
forwarded as outlined in the report.
Commissioner Kishel moved __ that the Planning Commission _ recommend to the
Ci ty__,Counci l .. they. forward. Staff's, comments.,, listed in the January„,14,, w 1981_
staff rePort the Cat! x of „ White Bear Lake.
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - all.
E. Discussion - Procedure for processing amendments proposed at neighborhood
meetings.
Secretary Olson asked for direction from the Commission as tolhow
they want to handle the changes suggested by the people at the public
hearings for the Plan update.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was a legal requirement to hold
additional public hearings.
Secretary Olson said there is no legal requirement.
Commissioner Kishel said he thought the Commission should consider the
suggestions made by the people at the meetings and decide if it should be
incorporated into the Plan.
4 2 -2 -81
Commissioner Fischer said she thought more than just the person that
is asking for the Plan change should be informed. People that own property
surrounding the proposed change would be affected by it.
Commissioner Pellish said he thought the Plan should be forwarded
to the Council after the public hearings for their consideration.
Commissioner Barrett agreed with Commissioner Pellish.
Commissioner Whitcomb said he thought the Commission should make the
people aware that commented on the Plan, their recommendations were taken
under consideration by the Commission.
Commissioner Pellish suggested forwarding a copy of the minute to the
people who commented at the public hearings with a letter thanking'
for their input.
F. Election of Vice- Chairman
Commissioner Barrett m4yad_tho. P]. nn n __C4 n .as.ion, -gi . t.Duane
Pr ts__y e - ha i rma n ,
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
9. OLD BUSINESS
10. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
A. Intent of Plan
Commissioner Howard said the reason he asked this information b e
forwarded to the Commission is to find out if the Commission should plan
development in the manner in which they feel is the best for the City or
assume the development which has taken place is best for the City and
recognize it. He has heard comments at various hearings that where
land is developed, such as with single family homes, it should be designated
as that in the Plan.
Commissioner Fischer said she thought that where there are firmly
established single family neighborhoods they should be designated for
that and not designated for something else that could never be developed
there.
Commissioner Kishel said the Plan is designed to be flexible, o it
can be changed when necessary.
B. Minnesota Supreme Court Decision
Commissioner Pellish said this information was requested for gtpneral
information for the Commission
11. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
12. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:10 P.M.
5 2 -2 -81
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1981, 7:30 P.M.
BEAVER LAKE SCHOOL, 1060 N. STERLING AVENUE
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett Present
Commissioner Paul Ellefson Absent
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Present
Commissioner William Howard Absent
Commissioner Edward Kishel Absent
Commissioner Joseph Pellish Present
Commissioner Duane Prew Present
Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present
Commissioner David Whitcomb Present
3. PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Axdahl said the purpose of the public hearing is to receive
comments on the proposed Comprehensive Plan update. He introduced
the members of the Commission and the Council members present. He
indicated that in 1973 Maplewood adopted a Land Use Plan, in 1976 the
Legislature adopted a Mandatory Land Planning Act which required an
update of the Comprehensive Plan. He outlined the procedures followed
in adopting this update. He explained the difference in the terms
used in the Land Use Plan and also the Zoning Code.
Secretary Olson gave a summary as to what is included in the
Comprehensive Plan. He said the City is divided into 13 different
neighborhoods. Each neighborhood has a projected population. There
is also a planned bike /trail route and sidewalk plan. There is also
a park plan incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. He explained'
what type of development was permitted in the different land use
categories. He reviewed the land use maps for Area 3.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to
comment on the Plan.
Ed O'Mara, 1786 Maryknoll, said the property where the 3M development
is located was zoned Industrial, the property is now designated Development
Research. 3M had requested this Industrial Zone so their operation would
comply with the zoning requirements of the City. He thought development and
research would not include the manufacturing of products.
1 2 -9 -81
Tim Magill, 787 Mary Street, said according to the neighborhood map
approximately 25% of the High Density Residential is to be in the 3eaver
Lake neighborhood. He could only locate one area on the neighborhood
map designated Rh and thought it a small area for approximately 24)00
people.
Secretary Olson reviewed the areas of Beaver Lake neighborhood that
are also designated for Rh land use. He said he would again review the
calculations to make sure there has not been an error.
Mr. Magill asked if there was a high rise apartment development
proposed for the area to Stillwater Road /Stillwater Avenue intersection.
Secretary Olson said the Council did review a project for two 3-story
apartment buildings. Council did approve the Planned Unit Development
permit.
Wayne Haag, 2407 Stillwater Road, asked if the open space designated
property was to be purchased by the City or would it be private land that
owners would not be permitted to develop.
Chairman Axdahl said there are a number of different categories
under the Open Space. The only way to guarantee open space is for the
City to purchase it. The definition of Open Space ranges from the water
space of a lake,to cemeteries and schools. The City would not be
purchasing all of the open space listed.
Secretary Olson said that some of the open space property is
owned by Ramsey County, some is owned by the Highway Department. If
the City does not purchase property designated Open Space, then the
City will try and work with a developer to keep as much of the land
open as possible. Some of the open spaces that are designated follow
natural drainage courses and are wetlands. These properties are
not always conducive to development.
Bill Oliver, Beaver Lake Church, questioned if the portion of land
lying south of 7th Street on previous plans had been designated Rm.,
Secretary Olson said that property was designated Rh on the 1973
Plan.
Mr. Oliver asked if the City Council can designate property or
zone property for a use that the surrounding residents would not
wish to have. (He was talking about the SC designation north of
Sarracks)
Chairman Axdahl said there are procedures to follow in both a
Plan amendment and zone change.
Mr. Oliver said in the same general area there is a portion designation
NP, Neighborhood Park, he asked for an explanation.
Secretary Olson said it is shown as an existing neighborhood park. He
believes there is a joint use with Gethsemane for use of the ball diamonds.
Mr. Oliver asked if the Planning Commission was familiar with the proposed
hearings scheduled for March for the McKnight realignment.
2 2 -9 -81
Secretary Olson said the County has resubmitted an Environmental
Assessment Worksheet to the Federal government. The County is proposing
to set up some design and location hearings to show where the realignment
is proposed to go. After the hearings the County Board will make a
decision as to whether or not to go ahead with the project.
Mr. Oliver asked if the Planning Commission has input into that project.
Secretary Olson said yes, however, it is primarily a County project.
The City will make recommendations but will not make the final decisions.
Commissioner Prew said the routing for streets on the Plan is what
the Commission understands the County and State intend to use.
Roland Vogel, 2674 E. Maryland, asked what was proposed for the
Maple Greens property. The Plan designates it for Rm. He had heard
that a 55 unit apartment building is to be constructed. He did not
think this would be Medium Density.
Secretary Olson said the property is designated Rm, Medium Density
Residential, however it would be medium density over the whole area.
The Planned Unit Development approved by the City Council approved
quad development and also an apartment at Maryland and Ferndale. There
is also townhouses proposed and another apartment project at Marylake
Road. Buy use of a PUD, the open space can be preserved and the Rm
density will be complied with.
Mr. Vogel asked what was going to be constructed at the location
where there has been some fill put in.
Secretary Olson said the Council has given approval for final plat
to Cave's Century Addition to construct nine quad buildings along Ferndale.
Birger Johannessen, 1167 Glendon Street, said he wished to discuss
the same property. He is concerned with the water drainage of this area.
He asked where the water would be held for the Maple Greens project. He
had a problem with water on his property last year. He said Maryland
Avenue works as a dam now, instead of the open creek, there is now a pipe.
Under flooding conditions this pipe cannot handle the water. He asked
where the water would be held.
Secretary Olson said there is an area by the proposed golf course
which is to be used for a holding pond. If there is a specific flooding
problem, it could be referred to the City Engineer.
Jean Meyers, 1920 McKnight Road, asked if the map showing the realignment
of McKnight Road was fairly new. She is one of the people that would not
like to see McKnight realigned.
Secretary Olson said the alignment shown was on the Land Use Plan when
it was adopted in 1973. There is no change proposed in the Plan. at
probably came from the County's plan at the time.
Mrs. Meyers asked if the population figures for the neighborhood is
when it is totally developed.
Secretary Olson said yes.
3 2 -9 -$1
Mrs. Meyers asked if the open space property is what is existing or
what is proposed.
Commissioner Fischer said that is the total acreage for the future.
Jim Ek, 1807 Myrtle Street, said he was interested in the neighborhood
park, south of Holloway, between Myrtle and McKnight. He asked what effect
this park would have on the wildlife in the neighborhood.
Commissioner Fischer said the park planning is done by the Parks
Commission as to what type of development will occur at a park site.
A neighborhood park would not have a high intensity neighborhood use.
It would not have the ball fields. She explained the procedure
followed by the Parks Commission in determining what type of facilities
will be included in a neighborhood park.
Mr. Ek said Ripley Street is also shown on the plan that is presently
not constructed, would this be constructed from Myrtle to McKnight,
Commissioner Fischer said this roadway was once a condition of, the
Maple Woods Townhouse development. At the time the feasibility stidy
was done, it was determined it was not economically feasible to
construct it.
Mr. Ek asked where access to the park would be.
Commissioner Fischer said she thought the Tierney Street alignment
still existed and could be provided over that.
Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing.
4. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
4 2 -9 -81
DATE: February 9, 1981
V1//\\I TIME: 7:00 P.M.
PLACE: Beaver Lajke School Gym
Map /ewood
Planning . AGENDA LOCATION: 1060 N. terling Ave.
.
1
I
1. Welcome and background information Planning Commission Chairman
2. Summary of Plan - Director of Commutity Development
3. Public Comments •
DATE: January 26, 1981
vAl TIME: 7:00 P.M.
PLACE: 2135 Birmingham Street
Maplewood LOCATION: Weaver School Cafeteria
Planning ` AGENDA
Commis ion
1. Welcome and background information - Planning Commission Chairman .
2. Summary of Plan - Director of Community Development
3. Public Comments
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1981,7:30 P.M.
CARVER SCHOOL, 2630 UPPER AFTON RD.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett Absent
Commissioner Paul Ellefson Present
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Absent
Commissioner William Howard Present
Commissioner Edward Kishel Present
Commissioner Joseph Pellish Present
Commissioner Ralph Sletten Absent
Commissioner David Whitcomb Present
if
3. PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman. Axdahl said the purpose of the public hearing is to present
some of the proposed changes in the Comprehensive Plan and to receive
comments relative to those changes. He introduced the members of the
Planning Commission, City Council and City Staff. The Comprehensive
Plan was developed in 1973 for Maplewood and in 1976 the Legislature
passed the Mandatory Land Planning Act. This required the present
update of the Plan.
Secretary Olson gave a summary of what was included in the Compre-
hensive Plan. Maplewood is divided into 13 neighborhoods. Each
neighborhood has a projected maximum population. The areas south of
Highway 94 and north of Highway 36 are two of the areas which are
proposed to have the largest population increase of the City. Also
included in the Plan is a planned bike /trail route and sidewalk plan.
The Plan also includes the proposed and existing parks in the City.'
He gave a summary as to what type of facilities would be provided at
the the parks. He explained what type of development was permitted
in the land use categories. Each of the land use maps were reviewed
for Area 4 and the changes that were made from the 1973 Plan. The
Land Use Plan is the guideline that the City uses when deciding
whether to rezone property. Zoniig determines what can legally be
done with the property.
Chairman Axdahl asked for comments on the Plan.
Mike Stroeing, 561 Ferndale, said his parents own property in the
area of Highway 36 and White Bear Avenue and they were informed the
property was being rezoned for multiple dwelling. He asked who
instituted the change, or is this just the proposed plan for the
future.
1 2 -23 -81
Chairman Axdahl said it is not a change, it is the same designation
that was in the 1973 Plan.
The following residents were present and commented on the proposed
commercial land use designation fir the property between Ferndale and
Carlton:
Mike Stroeing 561 Ferndale
Mabel Thompson 643 Ferndale
Phillis Schwartz 549 Ferndale
Bernard Mehr 687 Ferndale
Douglas Thompson 643 Ferndale
Robert Schwartz 649 Ferndale
James Ibertson 585 Ferndale
Mary Tessmer 607 Ferndale
Don Thompson 643 Ferndale
Mr. Stroeing said with regard to his own property at 561 Ferndale,
it is zoned Residential but being assessed through the Watershed District
for Commercial property. He asked why his property was going to be rezoned
commercial in the future.
Secretary Olson said the single family homes on Ferndale have long,
deep lots. The property behind that fronts on Carlton is zoned M -1.
The Land Use Plan designates the rear of the residential lots for
commercial use. This is not a change, it was designated the same in
the 1973 Plan.
Mr. Stroeing said because of he commercial designation he has a
much larger assessment than the r sidential property across the street
from him.
I
There were several property orners present indicated they had the
same problem. (names were not given prior to speaking)
One of the residents said most of the back of the lots are not
developed. He said the pond across Carlton on the 3M property does
have a lot of wildlife. The back of the lots do not abut a street
and do not have access to develop to commercial.
Chairman Axdahl suggested the residents attend the Watershed
District public hearing and explain the difference between the
Comprehensive Plan designation and existing zoning on the property.
They should make the hearing examiner aware the property is zoned
Residential.
Another resident asked how ttte property was listed with Ramsey
County. Was it designated residential or commercial.
Chairman Axdahl said the Comprehensive Plan is not at the County
Court House.
A resident said Ramsey County informed them the computer records
told them the property was commercial.
2 2-23-81
Another resident said Ramsey County has the power to assess property
on projected use of the property. Because this is being projected as
a commercial area, the property is thus being assessed that way.
Chairman Axdahl said it was his understanding the projections would
be if and when it did develop.
A resident said the change has to be made with Maplewood before the
assessment can be changed.
Mayor Greavu suggested attending the Tuesday night meeting to discuss
the proposed assessment with the Watershed District.
A resident said he did present a map showing the zoning of the property
to a Board member and he indicated the project has to be planned for the
future, thus it is assessed for the future.
Commissioner Kishel questioned if the Commission would have adequate time
to consider a Plan change prior to the adoption of the assessment roll for
the project.
Mabel Thompson, 643 Ferndale,, also commented on the proposed assessment
for Battle Creek.
Douglas Thompson asked how the Commission could zone the property
Commercial without the residents approval. They do not wished to be
zoned or considered in future plapis for commercial use. They do not
wish to be anything other than residential zoning.
Phyllis Schwartz, 649 Ferndale, asked when the Beaver Lake meeting
was held.
Secretary Olson said Februaryl9.
Bernard Mehr, 687 Ferndale, wants the property designated residential.
Robert Schwartz, 649 Ferndaleb also wishes his property to be residential.
Larry Morgan, 2434 Nemitz, asked if the Commission thought Met Council
would like the Plan. He has heard that Met Council would like to have
Maplewood develop with higher densities.
Chairman Axdahl said Meto Council did approve the original Plan. He would
hope Met Council would not return it requesting higher densities.
Secretary Olson said the only; thing by law that Met Council can make
the City change are things that affect Metropolitan systems such as the
Metro Highway system, or Metro sewer. They can make recommendations on
other things.
James Imbertson, 585 Ferdnale, said he could not develop the balance of
his property as it abuts the healph spa, so therefore wishes R -1 zoning.
Mary Tessmer, 607 Ferndale, Wishes the property residential.
Don Thompson, 643 Ferndale, asked if the Commission could forward a
3 2 -23 -81
letter to the Watershed District saying they are taking it under advisement
to have residential for the area in question.
Steve Wolf, said although he coes not live on Ferndale he does sympathize
with the property owners. He lives at 22 Dennis Lane. He asked if the
Commission would consider changins the bike route so it could connect with
the Woodbury bike route. He and cthers ride their bikes to 3M would like
to see a route to that site via Century Avenue. Also, there is open space
proposed on Upper Afton road, however, there is a sign which indicates a
racquetball court is going to be constructed there. Which is accurate.
Secretary Olson said the property known as the "Jordan 40" has been
acquired as part of the regional park system except the one parcel for the
racquetball court.
Tony Bekavac, 48 Mayhill, askec if there was a future plan to update the
street. Upper Afton Road has beer upgraded in both St. Paul and Woodbury
and he was wondering when it woulc be done in Maplewood.
Chairman Axdahl suggested Mr. Bekavac contact the City Engineer for
information on road updating.
A resident said he questioned the figures on area 10, the population
is shown as proposed to be doublec, 1,067 to 2,186. The map on page
19 -23 shows only two areas that are not fully developed now. One is the
RL south of Carver School and the other Rh, south of the creek. How is
the population going to double with the small area to build on.
Secretary Olson said he will have to review the figures. He could
not see how it would double.
The resident said he was also in favor of the bicycle pathways. He
said there is an easement on Sterling Avenue where the bike path could
possibly be located. This is a Williams pipeline easement.
Wayne Marzolf, 47 Farrell Street, said the plan shows the existing
sidewalks and asked if there was plans to install more sidewalks.
Chairman Axdahl said this is a decision the Council has to make.
Mr. Marzolf said he was not it favor of additional sidewalks
Ms. Drexler, 1175 Ripley, requested to see the Gladstone neighborhood
map.
Secretary Olson said there are really no changes in the Gladstone
plan from the 1973 Plan. A park has been eliminated in the back oflthe
school site.
Ms. Drexler said she was concerned with the Burlington Northern, property
at Frost and English.
Secretary Olson said the property is proposed as Service Commercial
for the easterly 2/3 and the southwesterly corner is planned for Rm.
4 2 -23 -81
Ms. Drexler asked if a portion of the property would be taken for the
park.
Secretary Olson said right now there is no additional land proposed
for the park. The only park land proposed is the existing and is not
proposed for expansion.
A resident said he did not think the 1973 Plan showed an interchange
at Highwood and Century. He asked who was proposing this and why.
Secretary Olson said it was in the 1973 Plan. At the present time
there are no plans to construct it. It is a State Highway Department
interchange. This would not be constructed in the near future. It
would provide better access for the residents in the area and also in
Woodbury. Woodbury is asking for another location for the interchange.
A resident asked how often the Plan would have to be updated.
Chairman Axdahl said the Mandatory Land Act says it must be updated
at least once every 10 years.
Richard Anderson, 2489 Brookview, asked what the current thinking
is for the use of the open space area in Battle Creek neighborhood.
Chairman Axdahl said the open space there is mostly County park.
They would have to give the answers as to what is proposed for the
use.
Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend that the line between the
LSC and RL be moved to the west so it runs down the rear property line
Qf the lots on the west side ofFerndale street __to
1. The existing housing land USE pattern,
2. The existing R -1 zoning, and
3. The expressed wishes of the cwners of the lots.
Commissioner Pellish seconded Ayes - all.
4. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:25 P.M.
4 2- 23-81
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
7:30 P.M., MONDAY, MARCH 2, 1981
1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meetinc to order at 7:30 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett Present
Commissioner Paul Ellefson Present
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Present
Commissioner William Howard Present
Commissioner Edward Kishel Present
Commissioner Joseph Pellish Present
Commissioner Duane Prew Present
Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present
Commissioner David Whitcomb Present(arrived 7:35 P.M.)
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. January 12, 1981
Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the minutes of January 12, 1981
as submitted.
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - 8
Abstained - 2 (Commissioners Ellefson
and Hejny)
B. February 2, 1981
Commissioner Barrett moved approval of the minutes of February 2, 1981
as submitted.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - 7
Abstained - 3 (Commissioners Ellefson,
Hejny, Prew)
C. February 9, 1981
Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the minutes of February 9,
)981 as submitted.
Commissioner Pellish seconded Ayes - 7
Abstained - 3 (Commissioners Ellefson,
Howard and Kishel)
1
0 7 fl7
D. February 23, 1981
Commissioner Pellish proved approval of the minutes of February 23, 1981
as submitted.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - 6
Abstained - 4 (Commissioners Barrett,
Hejny, Sletten, Prew)
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Barrett moved approval of the agenda as submitted.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
Commissioner Whitcomb arrived at the meeting
5. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Plan Amendment - 1530 McKnight Road (Votel Realty
Secretary Olson read the notice of public hearing.The applicant is
requesting a Plan amendment from RL to RLE. Staff is recommending approval
of the request as outlined in their report.
Dick Nowlin, representing Votel Realty and Howard Christensen, said
his letter of February 18, 1981 outlines their position and request. intend to return with a Planned Unit Development request as e
well as
a subdivision request. He thought the question of sanitary sewer
can be handled at that time. They are not asking for a greater density
than permitted under RL. Since the last review, they have reduced the
proposed number of units for the site. They have also added a parcel
along McKnight Road which will give better access to the site and add to
the overall acreage of the site. He said the natural features on the
property justify special consideration under the Comprehensive Plan.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was information as to where the
realignment of McKnight Road will to with relation to this property.
Mr. Votel said the only information they have is that the County is
looking for an additional 50 feet of right of way along the west property
line.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak
in favor of the requested change. He asked if there was anyone who
wished to speak in opposition to tha change or has questions.
Jim Mueller, 1568 Myrtle Street, asked where the sewer for this project
is coming from.
Secretary Olson said he did not have details, but it would come from
the south.
Mr. Mueller asked if development of the site was contingent upon the
Sewer being extended to it.
Secretary Olson said it appears that way, but further study is required.
2 3 -2 -81
Mary Mathews, 1592 Myrtle, said they would like to have the totlot
as shown on the Plan. He asked if it still remains.
Secretary Olson said it is in the Plan. However, the Parks Commission
i s te. n ot doing anything actively right now as far as establishing a specific
s i
Chairman Axdahl closed the public hearing portion.
Commissioner Kishel moved tha: the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council approval of the Plan amendment from RL to RLE on the basis that:
1. There are significant woodlots and steep contours that could be preserved
on this site by clustering units.
2. This proposal would enhance the housing plans objective of providing a
"wide variety of housing types ", without exceeding the maximum percentage
of townhouse units proposed in the housing plan.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - all.
6. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
7. COMMUNICATIONS
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Special Exception - 1772 Ruth (Anderson)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a home
occupation to operate a custom drapery and decorating business. Staff
is recommending approval of the request.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone else present who wished
to comment on the proposal.
Commissioner Ellefson moved the Planning Commission recommend to the
„ City Council approval of the •ro•osed home occupation for a custom
drapery and decorating business at 1772 Ruthstreet� subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall apply for a renewal of the home occupation permit
after one year. If there have been no complaints the permit may be
renewed.
2. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Planning Commission Sub -
committee report.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
B. Special Exception - 3095 McKnicht Road (Kennedy)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a home
occupation permit to operate a retail store in the home. Staff is
recommending approval as outlined in their report.
3 3 -2 -81
Commissioner Howard asked if any reaction from the neighbors had been
received.
Secretary Olson said no comments had been received in the office, however,
no notices have been sent out. The applicant indicated he had talked to some
of the neighbors.
Lorna Kennedy, 3095 N. McKnight, they can provide the two exits required,
one to the front, a sliding glass door in the back and a hallway to the
garage. At present time there is only one neighbor.
Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission recommend to theme
Council approval of the request for a home occupation permit to operate a
retail a ore in_tha ItQme at 301.3 McKni ght Road subiect to the fo lowin
pondi tiotls:
1. Compliance with the criteria outlined in the Planning Commission Sub -
committee Report, except number 5.
2. Approval is granted for one year, after which time the applicant may
apply for a renewal if the business is compatible with the neighborhood
and all conditions are being met.
3. There should be at least one 10 pound ABC fire extinguisher provided.
4. The area to be used for the business should be separated from the furnace
room by a one hour fire wall.
5. There should be two exits available from the business area.
6. Expansion of the driveway or driveway turn around is prohibited. No
parking shall be permitted in the driveway turn around.
Commissioner Hejny seconded. Ayes - all.
Chairman Axdahl asked if the Commission wished to comment on criteria
#5 of the Subcommittee report.
Commissioner Prew said he thought it was a good item to keep, the
Commission may wish to use it at certain locations.
C. Preliminary Plat - Maple Park Shores
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a preliminar y
plat for 20 townhouse lots and an cutiot. Staff is recommending approval as
Outlined in their report.
Craig Thaemert, president of Rolling Greens, was present at the meeting.
9
Chairman Axdahl asked if there Nas anyone else present who wished to
:omment on the proposal.
Commissioner Ellefson moved the Planni,ng ,Commission r - ommend o
it Council approval of the reliminar lat located at Co a Avenue
ennard Street sub'ect to the condition that the fin ales htthal1 notes
, pproved until:
4 3 -2 -81
I
1. The City Attorney has approved the bylaws and
Y rules of the proposed
homeowner's association to a•sure that all common areas will be
maintained.
2. A signed developers agreemene for the construction of utilities through
the site and enlargement of 'he existing
ding
and approved by the Director of Public Works
facility is submitted
3. An easement over Outlot A shall be dedicated to the City for drainage
and utility purposes on the f'nal plat.
Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes - all.
D. Code Amendment - Maximum Garale Area
Secretary Olson said staff feels that our garage size ordinance is
restrictive and should be reconsicered. Therefore, they are recommending
an amendment to the ordinance to 'emit construction of larger garages.
Commissioner Prew asked if the definition of total floor area was
clear in the code.
Secretary Olson read the exispin definition nation from the Code. A two
story house would get credit for bath floors.
Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council approval of the ordinance amendment as outlined in the Staff's
re ort dated February 26, 1981.
,Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes all
E. Variance - Brooks and Germain Cardinal)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a variance
for an oversized garage. Staff is recommending denial as outlined in their
report.
Mr. Cardinal said he plans to construct a home on the property. As the
code exists, he can construct more than one garage on his property. He is
just asking for 90 square feet additional. He did speak to the neighbors
and they were all in agreement.
Commissioner Prew moved the Pla ninq Commission recommend to the Board,
'f Adjustments and Appeals approval of the requested variance as the
ommission has recommended an amend entto the code to change the
aximum •ara•e size.and reco•nizin• there could be dela s in the
ffnra l i Zat on Qf mss, amendment.
Commissioner Barrett seconded
Commissioner Pellish said the a'plicant by applying for a variance, is
p reventing an undue hardship by
p
Would be incorporating it wiithin°
th e structure. pr o theft.
Having tostoretheseeitems
ff -site would cause an undue hards ip.
Voting:
Ayes - all.
3 -2 -91
F. Plan Amendments from Neighbo hood Hearings:
2. Area 2
e. Highway 36 and White Bear Avenue (Northeast Corner)
A number of resident., at the Area 2 neighborhood hearing requested
that the Rh designation .t the northeast corner of Highway 36 and
White Bear Avenue be cha ged to RL.
Commissioner Pellish asked what the zoning of the parcel is.
Secretary Olson said basically R -1, there are a couple of
BC lots and one R -3 lot.
Chairman Axdahl aske. if there was anyone present who wished
to comment on the issue.
Roger Anitzberger, 19'9 Castle Avenue, speaking for the people
who presented the petitio , presented 10 more signatures to add to
the petition. All but on property owner signed. The residents
wish to see their propert, maintained as RL. Most of the residents
do not object to commercial use on llth Avenue.
Commissioner Pellish n. -' 1- P .n in. Commission rec. , mend
changing the land use designation at the northeast corner of
White Bear Avenue and Hig war 36from Rh to RL in order to recognize
.nd .rotect the existing .in•le famil homes.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - all
d. Highway 36 and White :ear Avenue /County Road C (Wessin)
Stanley Wessin reques s that the LSC designation on the northwest
corner of Highway 36 and hite Bear Avenue to change to SC and that
the RL designation west o White Bear - Avenue and south of County Road
C should be changed to a classification allowing a multi le' development.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished
to comment on the issue.
Stan Wessin, Hamel, Minnesota said he agreed with the Staff
report.
Commissioner Fischer _.. oVed the Planning Commission recommend to
change the LSC designatio at the northwest corner of Highw y 36
And White Bear Avenue to PW, Business Warehouse and change the LSC
designation north of llth 'venue to SC, Service Commercial, on the
Oasis that the Plan update has changed the definition of LSC so that
it does not _refle s - '.,, approved plans for e isting development.
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - all.
1. Area 1
a. Rice Street (City of Roseville)
The City of Roseville .tated that Rice Street is designated as
a major arterial which doe. not conform to the 1990 Functional
3 -2 -81
Classification System as required by the Metropolitan Council. Staff
is recommending no change.
Commissioner Prew moved the Plannin Commi recommend no
change in the designation of Ri...0 Street and advise the City of
Roseville of this decision,
Comissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - all.
b. Rice Street (Schroeder)
Mr. Schroeder is requesting more commercial depth along
Rice Street and to change the Rm designated property to Rh.
Staff is recommending approval.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend
approval of the enlargement of the SC area along Rice Street and
changing the Rm property to Rh on the basis that it would create
more useable commercial sites on Rice Street and increase needed
Rh land.
Commissioner Prew seconded Ayes - all.
c. McMenemy Street and Roselawn Avenue (Devine)
Ray Devine was concerned with having an adequate buffer for
the homes on the east side of McMenemy Street from commercial
development on the side side of McMenemy, north of Roselawn.
Staff is recommending a change to LSC.
Commissioner Barrett w ed the Planning Commission rem me nd
cha.n.gi.n._ _SC,._desigttatien_.a.iL
the .ortbwest corner of M„cM n my
.S ree.t_Anc__RQ.s.elawn. Avenue, to LSC.
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
d. Roselawn Park (Devine)
Ray Devine suggested expanding the open space and park designation
on Roselawn Park west to McMenemy Street. Staff is recommending no
change.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend no
change on the basis thatthe Park and Recreation Commission is not
pj anni ng _to expand Rose1 awr. Park.
Commissioner Whitcomb secorded Ayes - all
2. Area 2
a. Beam Avenue - Three Changes (Vars)
Marilyn Vars requested three changes in the Kohlman Lake
neighborhood:
7 3-2 -81
1. Put more of a 90 degree angle in the alignment of Beam Avenue
west of Highway 61.
2. Change the Rm designation to RL
3. Change the LSC designation on the south side of Beam Avenue to
RL where there are existing homes.
Staff is recommending approval of the changes.
Commissioner Fischer suggested changing part of the RL,i area
north of proposed Beam alignment toLSC to prevent future problems
with property owners in the RL and possible objections to LSC
development.
Commissioner Kishel m ved the Planning Commission recommend
approval of the changes a recommended by the staff and Commission.
Commissioner Barrett seco ded Ayes - all.
b. County Road D (Hajicek)
Bob Hajicek requests the following changes be made:
1. The LSC, Rh, and RB designations on County Road D, west of White
Bear Avenue be changed to DC, Diversified Center
2.
Change the LSC designations on the north and south side of County
Road D, east of White Bear Avenue to SC to reflect current
development and move the division line between commercial and
medium density further to the east.
Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission recommend the
fo.11owing
1. Change the LSC designation at the northwest corner of County Road
D and White Bear Avenua to SC.
2. Retain the presently proposed designations for the RB and Rh
areas on County Road D
3. Change the LSC designations on the north and south sides of
County Road D, east of White Bear to SC, to reflect existing
development.
4. Do not change the boundary line between the LSC and Rm classifications,
without going through E. formal Plan amendment procedure.
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - all.
c. County Road C (Olson)
Lydia Olson requests that her property be changed from Open Space
to residential at 2005 East County Road C. Staff is recommending a
change to RL.
8 3 -2 -81
Commissioner Prew mo ed the Planning Commission recommend
changing the W designat'on at 2005 E. County Road C to RL.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
f. Cope Street Park (Ka anagh)
John Kavanagh requesis that the Cope Street Park site be changed
back to the previous designation of Rm. Staff is recommending
changing back to Rm but limited to the area not under condemnation.
Commissioner Prew no , Abe_ Plum iagimm s io. recommend
chancing the_northeast aria southwest corners of the_ cope Street Park
C 1?
slasignartiQn_t0 .., tm.,.,0 l m:t the park site to those areas under
gondemfl t loon.
Commissioner Fischer seco ded Ayes - all.
Commissioner Prew supested staff review the property located
at the southeast corner o County Road B and Highway 61. He
thought this was part of Ramsey County Property and should be
redesignated to Open Spac:.
Commissioner Prew movzd that the •ortion of the •ro•ert
d_esgnated Rm which is a••. rentl •art of Keller
Golf Course be desi•nated .s O•en S•ace.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
g. English and Frost (Bur ington Northern)
This is a request of B rlington Northern that the Rm and SC
designation be changed on heir property at English and Frost
to GI. Staff is recommend ng no change.
Commissioner Whitcomb ov_ed_ the Planning Commission recommend
no change the basis th.t;
1. The land use designation has not changed since the 1973 Plan was
adopted.
2. A formal Plan amendment process should be followed before any
change is made on this •roperty.
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - all
h. Larpenteur Avenue Bike rail
An error was noted in t e bicycle routes /trails /sidewalks map.
Staff is recommending correcting the map.
Commissioner Fischer mov -d to show the proposed bicycle route/
trail on larpenteur Avenue f om East S or r'
��1_ h_ i ta_Bear AvPnliA
and on White Bear Avenue fro Lar
?eB �r to North ct jJ1 Rnairl
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all
9 3 -2 -81
i. VanDyke (Laundervill )
Connie Launderville r quests that the property on the west side
of VanDyke Street and no th of County Road B be designated for some
type of residential development to act as a buffer between the
Commercial development tc the west and the homes to the east. Staff
is recommending a designation of Rm for the R -3 property.
Commissioner Howard moved the Planning Commission recommend
d- i•natin. the existin. R -3 zoned •ro.erty to Rm, not to include
.any commercially develope. property, on the basis that:
1. A buffer zone is need -d between the commercial development and
existing homes.
2. Council previously de ied a Plan amendment to Rh.
Commissioner Sletten seco ded Ayes - all.
j. Maplewood Heights Par' Extension (Verploegh)
Diane Verploegh reque.ts that the Maplewood Heights Park be
extended to White Bear Avenue. Staff is recommending no change.
Commissioner Sletten moved the_PR annjj g_ Commi ss i on recommend
DI change.
Commissioner Pellish secorded Ayes - all
3. Area 3 (None)
4. Area 4
a. I -494 Interchange (Woodbury)
The City of Woodbury notes that they are proposing a future
interchange on I -494 in the vicinity of Carver Avenue, rather than
the Maplewood Plan which shows the interchange at Century and
Highwood. Staff is recommending no change.
Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend
no change.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
b. Century -Upper Afton Bike Trail (Wolf)
Steve Wolf requested that the bicycle route map be changed to
tie in the Maplewood Trail system with the Woodbury system which ends
at Upper Afton and Century. He specifically would like a route from
Upper Afton to 3M Company.
Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission show all of
Upper Afton Road as a proposed bicycle route and show Century Avenue
from UPP J' Afton to Conway as a oroposod bicycle route.
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - all
10 3 -2 -81
c. Upper Afton Racquetball Courts (Wolfe)
Steve Wolf noted that he Jordan 40 property on Upper Afton
Road is shown as Open Spa e, while a racquetball club has been
proposed for the site.
Commissioner Fischer oved to change the Open Space desjgnation
on the racquetball court .ite to LSC, Limited Service Commercial.
Commissioner Prew seconded Ayes - all.
d. Battle Creek Population
A resident in Area 4 fomented that the
population
page 10 -7 for the Battle 'reek neighborhood lo t
ked figures
on
inaccurate.
Commissioner Pellish oved to adopt the changes in the population
figures and make them whe e appropriate in the rest of the Plan.
Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes - all.
5. General Comments
a. Watershed Board
The Ramsey - Washington etro Watershed District feels that because
the Plan has been updated, the City's drainage plan should also be
revised. Staff is recomme ding no change.
Commissioner Sletten moved the Planning Commission recommend no
change in the drainage pla .
Commissioner Whitcomb seco ded Ayes - all.
b. County Highway
Ramsey County notes th.t there is a different functional
classification system for - treets on page 15 -6 of the Plan update
and page 75 of the Plannin• Inventory. Staff is recommending no
change.
Commissioner Sletten mo ed the Plannin Comm ission reco mmend no
change .
Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes - all.
c. County Parks
The Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department requests that those
County parks that are not r:gional parks, should be designated only as
County parks on the map on 'age E -11.
11 3 -2 -81
Commissioner Pellish, moved to remove the regional park
designation from those County parks on the map on page E -11 and,
establish a separate key for these parks,labeled "County Parks ".
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
9. OLD BUSINESS
10. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Secretary Olson asked what the Commission wished as far as notifying
the people of the action taken on their Plan change requests. He suggested
a copy of the minutes be forwarded to each person.
A. Council Agenda
11. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
12. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 10:05 P.M.
12 3 -2 -81
DATE: March 2, 1581
I s
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
PLACE: 1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood
k./ P l arming LOCATION: Council Cha•nbers
»
C`o mi A NDA
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. approval of Minutes
A. January 12, 1981
B. February 2, 1981
C. February 9, 1981
D. February 23, 1981
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Public Hearings
A. Plan Amendment: 1530 McKnight 'Noad (Votel Realty)
6. Visitor Presentations
7. Cpmmunications
8. New Business
A Special Exception: 1772 Ruth (A derson)
B. Special Exception: 3095 McKnigh Road (Kennedy)
C. Preliminary Plat: Maple Park Shores
D. Code Amendment: Maximum Garage area
E. Variance: Brooks and Germain (C.rdinal)
F. Plan Amendments from Neighborhoo. Hearings:
1. Area 1
a. Rice Street (City of Ros_ville)
b. Rice Street (Schroeder)
c. McMenemy Street and Roselawns Ave. (Devine)
d. Roselawn Park (Devine)
2. Area 2
a. Beam Ave. - 3 changes (Va s)
b. County Road D (Haijek)
c. County Road (Olson)
d. 36 and White Bear /County 'oad C (Wessin)
e. 36 and White Bear (N.E. corner)
f. Cope Street Park (Kavanag )
g. English and Frost (Burlinl!ton Northern)
h. Larpenteur Ave. bike trai
i. Van Dyke (Launderville)
j. Maplewood Hts. Park exten• ion (Verploegh)
MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 2 March 2, 1981
3. Area 3 (None)
4. Area 4
a. I -494 interchange (Woodbury)
b. Century -Upper Afton bike trail (Wolf)
c. Upper Afton racquetball courts (Wolf)
d. Battle Creek Population
5. General Comments
a. Watershed Board
b. County Highway
c. County Parks
9. Old Business
10. Corimission Presentations
A. Council Agenda
11, Staff Presentation
12. Adjournment
CITY OF
m A l pLEwo OD
1380 FROST AVENI. E MAPLEWOOI) MINNESOTA 55109
OFFICE OF COMMUNITI SERVICES - 770 -4570
March 10, 1981
Mayor Greavu
City Council Members
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, tin 55109
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
It was with great concern that the Park and Recreation
Commission was made aware o the tragic death of a young
man while walking along ilea, Avenue one night this b,inter.
In light of this, the Coinmi sion requests that a greater
priority on provisions for •edestrian and bike traffic
to and artoof the
alltipresentdatn .lfuture the
developeent
be a p this
area.
Sincerely,
Dean Sherburne
Chai rman
cc: Manning Commission
DATE: March 16, 1981
y/l\1 TIME: 7:30 P.M.
PLACE 1380 Frost Avenue
M apIEWOOI / LOCATION: Council Chambers
P / ann ii g ' AGENDA
Co* ; fission
1. Cal" to Order
2. Roll Call
3. .Approval of Minutes
A. March 2, 1981
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Pudic Hearings
6. Visitor Presentations
7. Conmunications
8. New Business
A. Variance: Kohlman Ave. (Behrens)
B. Special Exception: Century Ave. (The 3rd Generation)
C. Preliminary Plat: Carsgrove's Meadows
D. Keller Parkway Sewer
E. Plan Update: Water Towers
F. Plan Update: Capital Improvement Program Revision
G. Plan Update: Sewer Plan Revisiors
9. Old Business
10. Commission Presentations
11. S.aff Presentation
12. Adjournment
•
MINUTES OF THE MAPLE OOD PLANNING COMMISSION
7:30 P.M., MONDAY MARCH 16, 1981
1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett Present
Commissioner Paul Ellefson Present
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Present
Commissioner William Howard Present
Commissioner Edward Kishel Present
Commissioner Joseph Pellish Present
Commissioner Duane Prew Present
Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present
Commissioner David Whitcomb Present
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. March 2, 1981
Correct: Page 8, paragraph . should state "Commissioner Fisch r suggested
changing part of the RL area nor'h of proposed Beam alignment to L$C . . ."
Commissioner Kishel moved ap.roval of the minutes of March 2, 1981 as
corrected ---m -- - -- -- -- - -- --- -_
Comissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Barrett moved ap.roval of the agenda
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
7. COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman Axdahl said a letter was received from Stan Wessin thanking the
Commission for considering the co ments received from property owners at the
Comprehensive Plan update public earings. Also received was the revised
rules and regulations from the Va ley Branch Watershed District..
1 3 -16 -81
NEW BUSINESS
A. Variance - Kohlman Avenue (:ehrens)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting a variance for a
substandard width lot. Staff i. recommending approval as outlined in
their report.
Chairman Axdahl asked if it was necessary to provide access to the
north of this area.
Secretary Olson said this w.s reviewed by staff, if there is going
to be a street, it would be an :xtension of Elm Street going north.
Mr. Behrens was present at 'he meeting.
Chairman Axdahl asked if th-re was anyone else present who wished to
comment on the request.
Commissioner Fischer moved t at the Planning Commission recommend
that the Board of Ad'ustments an• A..eals approve then e ueste• of width
variance to develop lot 59 Gard -na Addition. Appro val recommend d on
the basis that:
1. There are houses on 66 foot wide lots at 1417 and 1423 Kohlman Avenue
and a variance granted at 1429 Kohlman Avenue.
2. The intent of the Zoning Code would be satisified
3. The allowable density would rot be exceeded.
4. The lot excess the 10,000 sgLare foot minimum lot size. 1
Commissioner Prew seconded Ayes - 10
Abstained - 1 (Commissioner Sletten)
B. Special Exception - Century Avenue (The 3rd Generation)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a 's special
exception to operate an office -shop home remodeling use in a LBC district.
Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report.
Commissioner Pellish questioned having a time limit of 4:30 as there are
other businesses in the area that appear to have later hours.
Secretary Olson said this condition could be reviewed after one year.
At that time,if there is no problem,it could be removed. One conce n was
the proposed large bay located in the rear facing the residentia develop-
ment. If the building is not air conditioned, during hot summer days this
door may be left open and the noise from the power tools could be a nuisance.
Commissioner Pellish suggested moving the building closer to the north
property line. The trucks and cars then would be driving adjacent to
other commercial property and not residential property.
Secretary Olson said this would be reviewed more thoroughly through the
2 3 -16f-81
Community Design Review Board process.
Ray Aberzinsky, 3rd Generation Remodeling Contractor, said them is a
misunderstanding as to the location of the bay door. It will be on the back
side of the building. There is a row of pine trees at the rear pro erty line.
The building will be solid block, no windows in the shop area. The propose
now to use the first 20 feet for office and the remaining for st rage and
shop. There would be a rental office plus their own office. He also
questioned the time limitation. He said if they do get behind on work,
they would be working on Saturday 8:00 to 4:30 also. He requested the time be
changed to 6 days a week.
Commissioner Hejny asked if the applicant would consider moving the
building to the north property line.
The applicant said the reason they set the building along the south
property line is during the investigation of the lot they found there was
a problem with drainage. They intend to provide a Swale ditch of asphalt
for the drainage.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment
on the proposal.
Commissioner Pellish moved tre Plannin ,.Commission recommend to the Cit
Council a royal of the special exception for an office s opin a LBC - District,
base on the indinq dial the USE would be coms atible with the ad ace
residential d evelo ment and is ar a ro riate use ina LBC Distr with the
following conditions:
1. There shall be no outdoor storage of materials or equipment.
2. The site shall be properly screened by means of decorative fen4ing and /or
plantings to screen the site from the adjacent residential properties.
Screening shall be subject to approval by the Community Design Review
Board.
3. The building design and site plan shall be subject to the approval of the
Community Design Review Board.
1
4. Power tools shall not be use' after normal business hours of 8:00 A.M.
to 6:00 P.M., Monday through Saturday.
5. The use of the proposed builoing,shall be for office space and fdr
storage /shop area, shall not change without the City Council approving
of the change in use.
6. This permit is subject to re ewal after the first year of operation.
If there have not been any complaints, the special exception may be
renewed.
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
t
3 -16 -81
C. Preliminary Plat - Carsgrove's Meadows
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a reliminary
plat and vacation of a portion of the Cypress Street right -of -way. Staff
is recommending approval as outlined in their report.
Ralph Wagner, Probe Engineering, consultant for the developer -R berts
Properties, Inc., said there would be less feet of street in this plat than
the previous and there would also be less off -site construction of utilities
required. The developer is proposing to do the on -site utility construction
himself.
Commissioner Howard asked if there would be a holding pond in the northern
portion of the plat.
Secretary Olson said that wou d be determined by the feasibility study.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone else present who wish d to
comment.
Don Christianson, 1111 E. County Road C, said as President of t h e
Kohlman- Gervais - Keller Lakes Association they are concerned with po ding
and where the water will go from she development. The developer ex ects
the City to find places for the w ter to go. He thought the pondin,
should be done on -site. He aske if there would be storm sewers by the
time this development goes in to ake care of the run -off.
Secretary Olson said one of t e conditions for the development to occur
would be the ordering of projects for utilities.
Mr. Christianson asked if the Environmental Worksheet was available
to the Commission for their information. This would indicate what the
impact to the environment will be.
Secretary Olson said it was npt presented to the Commission.
Mr. Christianson, Secretary Olson, and Mr. Wagner discussed th procedure
followed in applying for a watersied permit.
Mr. Christianson asked if it l is permissible for a developer to off -
site ponding.
Secretary Olson said the City has a policy of not requiring on -site
ponding for every development.
Mr. Christianson said he was Present at this meeting to remind the
Commission to be concerned about the lakes and the park.
Commissioner Kishel moved the Plannin• Commission recommend to the
City Council approval of the vacation of the Cypress Street right -cf -wa
abutting the east line of the subTTeect property based on the__followi4:
III
4 3 -16 -81
1. Vacation would allow for a more efficient road system and platting
arrangement.
2. The right -of -way is not necessary for the development of adjacent
properties.
3. It is in the public interest to vacate.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - 10
Abstained - 1 (Commissioner Howard)
Commissioner Kishel moved th.t the Plannin• Commission recommend to the
Cit Council a••roval of the .rososed ' re imin r t su e o 1-
following conditions:
1. Council ordering whatever projects are necessary to provide two means of
access, by improved City street, sanitary sewer, storm sewer with ponds,
and extend and loop a water ine through the plat.
2. Include the proposed remnant parcel located west of the proposed Forest
Street, with the plat as an •utlot. This Outlot shall be combined with
the property to the west. T e metes and bounds property description for
the plat shall be changed to reflect the inclusion of this property.
3. Vacation of the 40 foot ingr:ss- egress easement south from County Road C
4. Dedication of a street and u ility easement for that portion of proposed
Forest Street which lies on he adjoining property to the west,
5. Staff approval of a finished grading and drainage plan.
6. Dedication of 33 feet rather than 43 feet for the south half of County
Road C
7. Transfer of the .7 persons /n-t acre density excess to the applicant's
property to the west.
8. Drainage easements shall be •edicated along the back lot lines, as per
the City Engineer's directio
9. Compliance with the recommen•ations of the Soil Conservation Service,
dated November 21, 1977.
10. Final plat approval cannot b- granted until the EAW process h.s been
completed.
11. Submission of a signed developer's agreement including two to porary
cul -de -sacs
12. Dedication of 10 foot tempo .ry roadway easements on the nort and south
sides of the easterly 60 feet of proposed Connors and Delmont Avenues for
purposes of temporary cul -d- -sacs. These easements are to be separate
from the plat.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - 10
Abstained - 1 (Commissioner Howard)
5 3 -16 -81
I '
D. Keller Parkway Sewer
Secretary Olson said it is re.uired the Planning Commission review
all capital improvement projects ithin the City to make a finding as
to compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Staff is recomm nding
the project be found consistent w'th the Plan.
Commissioner Kishel asked if there was any alternative for sup lying
the sewer facilities to the resid-nts on the east side of Keller Parkway.
Secretary Olson said he was n•t aware of any alternatives, although
he did not know the background o the study for this improvement.
Commissioner Kishel said he «ould see the need for this improv :ment,however,
there are existing facilities (Little Canada sewer line) that couls be
connected to.
Secretary Olson said the revised sewer plan shows a trunk line
running from County Road C south along Keller Parkway. The sewage
from these properties, the prope ty south and Palm Court would run
north to County Road C and then Last to the main interceptor on
Highway 61. The proposed improvement would probably provide a per anent
solution and trunk line would no' be necessary to County Road C.
Commissioner Kishel said the change would have to be made in he
Comprehensive Plan before this sroposal could be found consistent
with the Plan. Possibly this i em should be set aside until afte
item 8G.
Commissioner Kishel m• ed th° Planning Commission table this
item until later in the evening.
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - all.
E. Plan Update - Water Towers
Secretary Olson said the change would be to show the water towe s as
outlined in the 1975 Water Study.
Commissioner Pellish asked wh.t the Study forecasted as far as
construction of the water towers.
Secretary Olson said there is not a time table, in priority the
one on Stillwater Road and Centur would be constructed first. It as
indicated there is not sufficient water pressure to complete the
development of Maple Greens.
Commissioner Kishel moved tha' staff be directed to indicate on the
Plan the locations of the proposes water towers and �-_ -.. 'so is
tower as indicated in the staff r :.ort„da ed rr,,JL ,].
Commissioner Pellish seconded Ayes - all.
6 : -16 -81
J
F. Plan Update - Capital Improvement Program Revision
Secretary Olson said there was a conflict between the ranking s stem
used in the Sewer Plan and the one the Planning Commission develope• in the
Capital Improvements section of the Plan.
Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission ad2Q the recommended
changes to the C_ api tall Improvement Program of , ,,,the.,,.CQw, r fl 11si e P •
outlined in staff re ort of March 10 1981
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - all.
G. Plan Update - Sewer Plan Revisions
Secretary Olson said the proposed changes are minor changes. T ey are
mostly for clarification. Also, on page 9, make the necessary cha ges
on the map and the listing of protects on page 29.
Commissioner Kishel said he felt on -site sewer systems can be used
successfully under proper conditions. They would have to follo the
regulations and standards as established by the State of Minnesot..
Commissioner Pellish said on -site systems would have to be a
consideration when there is a proposed division of a large lot. here
has to be some way of checking on this.
Commissioner Kishel said the property would have to support 'he use
of a private system. That would have to be determined through te•ting.
Commissioner Prew moved the Comm ss i on_ ap,proyed ,changes # th ou2h
as outlined in staff's report of March 11,1981
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
D. Keller Parkway Sewer (Continued)
Commissioner Kishel moved the Plannin Commission recommend to the
City Council the final proposed Keller Parkwax Improvement.,be ,con i stent,
with the City' p hysical develo2,ment pla s ubec t to th followin•_
1. Discharge to Little Canada is considered interim prior to construction
of recommended project 901
2. Design and construction of this sewer is compatible with proposed future
construction of project 901
3. Subject to confirmation that project 901 is a valid concept.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
9. OLD BUSINESS
7 3 -16 -81
10. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
11 STAFF PRESENTATIONS
12. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:45 P.M.
8 3 -16 -81
DATE: April 6, 1981
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
M PLACE: 1380 Frost Avenue
o o
/ a�11� %fi d LOCATION: Council Chambers
ot /ew jssjor �1 G NS A
1. :all to Order
2. doll Call
3. approval of Minutes
A. March 16, 1981
4. Approval of Agenda
5. Public Hearings
A. Comprehensive Plan Update (hear ng only, action to be taken under Item 8 -4)
6. Visitor Presentations
7. Communications
A. Plan Amendment Guidelines: Met opolitan Council
• 8. New Business
A. Sewer Plan Revision: Project 90
B. Sewer Plan Revision: Forest St. Gervais Ave. lift station
C. Plan Update: Parks Element
D. Comprehensive Plan Update: Fina Action by the Planning Commission
E, Revenue Note: Toyota Dealership
F Street and Alley Vacations: Con or Ave. and Hazel St. (Wessin)
G. Preliminary Plat: Chesterwood
H. Code Amendment: Minimum House S zes
I. Variance: Phylis Court (Sonnen)
9. Old Business
10. Commission Presentations
11. Staff Presentation
12. Adjournment
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
7:30 P.M., MONDAY, APRIL 6, 1981
1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barrett Present
Commissioner Paul Ellefson Present
Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present
Commissioner Dorothy Hejny Present
Commissioner William Howard Present
Commissioner Edward Kishel Present
Commissioner Joseph Pellish Present
Commissioner Duane Prew Present
Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present
Commissioner David Whitcomb Present
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. March 16, 1981
Correct: Page 2, item 8A, #4 cf the motion "excess" should be "exceeds"
Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the minutes of March 16, 1981
as corrected.
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Kishel moved apprcval of the agenda as submitted.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Comprehensive Plan Update
Secretary Olson said the request is approval by the Planning Comriission
of the City's Plan Update. Staff is also recommending the City Council
accept the Plan update. A notice of hearing was published in the newspaper.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment
on the proposed Plan Update.
No one was heard.
Chairman Axdahl closed the pubic hearing
1 4 -6 -81
Commissioner Fischer moved to table 5A until after item 8C.
:ommissioner Barrett seconded es - all.
6. JISITOR PRESENTATIONS
7. - OMMUNICATIONS
4. Plan Amendment Guidelines - Met opolitan Council
The guidelines presented will b- followed by the City when makin• Plan
amendments.
8. NEW BUSINESS
4. Sewer Plan Revision - Project 901
Secretary Olson said the City ewer Plan proposes a trunk line o Keller
Parkway flowing north to County Ro.d C (Project 901). Staff is reco ending
this project to omitted from the Plan as the most practical alternat ve for
sewer service in Keller Parkway is a lateral service.
Public Works Director Haider s.id they are proposing to create a gravity
sewer along Keller Parkway. The a.jacent 6 property owners along Ke ler Parkway
petitioned for the improvement. He showed the routing for proposed P oject 901.
The elevations of the existing sewer along County Road C is such that the
sewer pipe would be out of the gro nd along Keller Parkway if extend :d in the
street itself.
Commissioner Howard asked if t e City had reviewed the alternati e of putting
the sewer line behind the residenc:s along Keller Parkway.
Engineer Haider said that is a option, however, he did not feel it would
be cost effective to use that alte native.
Commissioner Whitcomb moved the plannina Commission omit
roject 901 from the Sewer Plan,on the basis that t e most practical alternative
or sewer rvice i
se n e er and for'Palm Court, south of County Road C,
is lateral service, rattier than a runk line flowing north to County Roa
Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes - all.
B. Sewer Plan Revision - Forest S reet /Gervais Avenue lift station
Secretary Olson said staff is ecommending amendment of the Sewe'' Plan
to add a lift station at Forest St eet and Gervais Avenue and to change the
cost of Project 901.
Public Works Director Haider e plained the reasons for the proposed
changes to the Sewer Plan.
Commissioner Sletten asked if ,= lift station that is located in Maplewood
and not presently being used, could be removed and reused for this project.
2 4 -6 -81
Engineer Haider said some of the lift stations came as a large unit and
because of that, it would be expensive to remove it. The stations located
north of County Road C that are not being used are relatively small, low
capacity pumps and do not lend themselves to the other stations in town.
However, they are considered when a pump is needed.
Engineer Haider said this should be referred to as project 1004 rather
than 901.
Commissioner Prew moved the Plannin,Commission amend_ the�,Sewer
gn
to add a lift station and desiate Project,1004, group
#4 when development occurs in that area using the cost of $70,000.
Commissioner Kishel seconded Ayes - all.
C. Plan Update - Parks Element
Secretary Olson said the Parks Element should be changed to be consistent
with the wording on page 9 -2 of the Plan Update.
Commissioner Howard moved the Parks Element of the Plan update be revised
to replace the ?hrase "p1annin district" with "neighborhood planning areas"
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
D. Comprehensive Plan Update - Planning Commission Action.
Commissioner Kishel moved adoption of the followingC resolution:
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires local governmental
units to prepare comprehensive plans and submit them to the Metropolitan
Council for review; and
WHEREAS, these plans entitled City of Maplewood Comprehensive Plan and
Comprehensive Sewer Plan represent the response to the City of Maplewood
to the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, four neighborhood public hearings were held with required legal
notice; and
WHEREAS, these plans were sent to all adjacent or affected jurisdictions
for review and comment on October 21, 1980.
Be it hereby resolved by the Maplewood Planning Commission that :he update
of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plar, including the Comprehensive Sewer Plan
be adopted with all approved amendments.
Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes - all.
4 -6 -81
E. Revenue Note - Toyota Dealersh p
Secretary Olson said the request is for approval of tax exempt m'rtgage
revenue note financing in the amoun of $900,000. Staff is recommend ng
approval as outlined in their repo t.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to , omment
on the proposal.
The applicant said he would li e the approval of the request by he
Commission.
Commissioner Howard said he ob ected to the proposed dealership .efore.
He could not understand why a fore gn made product should be subsidised
through this type of financing.
Commissioner Prew moved the Pla nine_ Commission_ recommend to the ity
council assroval of the tax exempt ort.ae revenue note_financjng „irk r-
.mount of '.900 000 based on the finoin•s staff has resented listed_i,
, he Anal sis section of Staff's resort dated March 24 1981 a Approva r �s
•ubject to the following conditions
. Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval.
Payment of the deferred water a•,sessment of $1,615.35 plus interest.
commissioner Ellefson seconded eyes - 8
ays - 3 (Commissioners Whitcomb, oward,
and Kishel)
'. Street and Alley Vacations - Co nor Avenue and Hazel St. (Wessin)
Secretary Olson said the reques is to vacate Connor Avenue and Hazel
'street and intersecting alley west if White Bear Avenue and south of ounty
'oad C. Staff is recommending approval of the vacations.
Mr. Wessin said they would be b inging development plans to the City
.hortly.
Commissioner Barrett moved the ' 1 anni n_q_ Conmi ssi on recommend to t e Ci ty„
council aproval of the vacation of Connor Avenue, Hazel Street and the alley,
_ 11 of which are located on the wes'erly side of White Bea: Avenue in block 6,
a wood wAddition ,.., The 'Vacations re found to the public interest
ince these rights- of-way serve no 'ublic need and a re not planned - to be used
or vehicular t or pedestrian traffic.
ommissioner Hejny seconded yes - all.
. Preliminary Plat - Chesterwood
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of two variances
;nd a preliminary plat. Staff is r-commending approval as outlined in their
eport.
4 -6 -8
Commissioner Pellish questioned why the street should be renamed •ecause
.t is in general alignment with a street in Woodbury.
Secretary Olson said the Public Safety Department wants a uniform system
or naming streets. Also, as indicated in the Staff report, there a e already
a number of streets ending in "wooc and this could add to confusion in cases
of emergency.
Garet Bros, applicant, said they would like to have the street remain
Chesterwood, however, they would reconsider and return with sugges ions
to the City. They would like the condition removed they name the • treet
Glenross.
Commissioner Pellish asked wry Outlot A was not being platted .t
this time.
Mr. Bros said at the time the development was drawn up, there as
a moratorium on double dwellings. It is his desire to construct t o
double dwellings, with access via a common drive onto McKnight Roao.
The Conservation Department objected to any filling of the low spo
to the north of outlot A to develop it into single family lots. Th:•y
will submit platting later for dcuble dwellings.
Commissioner Whitcomb asked if the property line between lot 7 and
8 could be realigned to give the 60 foot frontage on lot 8.
Mr. Bros said he thought it would be difficult to go to the 60 how-
ever it could be raised to go to about 57 feet. Lot 8 does have more
square footage already.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to
comment on the proposal.
Commissioner Pellish moved the Planning Commission recommend
approval of the variance to allow 43 feet of frontage on 8 on he
basis that:-__- ._w.....� ...�,���....__...��,.Mti.� ..�_.fi��� .,.. . .�. w.�...� r,
1. The lot has three times the required minimum lot area.
2. The lot width at the building line exceeds the required minimu lot
width.
3. This variance permits a road placement which results in a grea ly
decreased amount of grading cn the lots on the cul -de -sac, les .
abrupt access to the lots on the east side and preservation of
many additional trees.
Approval of an 11 foot rear yard setback variance fora house on 1•t 5,
on the basis that:
1. The lot has four times the required minimum lot area.
2. There are no plans to construct anything on the property to the east.
3. It is the lot's larger than normal depth that is creating the eed for
the variance.
5 4 -6 -81
Approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions:
1. Dedication of an additional Three feet of right -of -way for McKnight
Road.
2. Driveways shall be limited to the cul -de -sac
3. Submission of a developers agreement before final plat approva
4. Change the street name to a ame mutually agreeable to the developer,
public safety and staff.
5. The driveway on lot 5 shall le constructed to channel run -off from the
drive to the cul -de -sac.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes - all.
H. Code Amendment - Minimum Hou.e Sizes
Staff is recommending amendi g the code to permit reduced minimum
floor areas and to include a def nition for floor area and single
family residence types.
Commissioner Fischer said th- HRA has discussed this subject at
their meetings. They are defini ely in favor of reducing the house
size. She suggested the Commiss'on table the proposed amendment
until the HRA as an opportunity o review the suggested changes.
Commissioner Fischer . - I t' table this item until after the
HRA has an oortuni ty to review it.
Commissioner Prew seconded Ayes - all.
I. Variance - Phylis Court (Son en)
Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting a variance to construct
a single - family dwelling with le•s than the required minimum floor area.
Staff is recommending approval a• outlined in their report.
Tom Sonnen said they are req esting approval of the variance.
Commissioner Prew moved the 'lannine Commission recommend to the Board
of Ad.iustments and Appeals afro al of p the requeste Eftoor areavariance_
based on staff's . . a . 4 f • . J jj j:
1. No floor area minimum presenily exists for tri -level dwellings,
2. The proposed floor plan is consistent with proposed revisions to the
Zoning Code.
3. Requiring the applicant to w.it until the Council completes its review
of the amendment proposal, would constitute an unnecessary hardship.
4. The mass of the prototype st ucture at 1587 Sandhurst Drive is
compatible with other develo.ment in the neighborhood.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
4 -6 -8-
9. OLD BUSINESS
10.E COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Commissioner Barrett suggested the Planning Commission recommend to
the Council they establish a mor.torium on revenue notes or eliminate
the Planning Commission review.
Commissioner Barrett moved t e Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council that a one year mor.torium be established in granting revenue
notes.
Commissioner Kishel seconded
Commissioner Fischer suggest°d the reason for the recommendation
should be included in the motion
The Commission discussed the City again reviewing the criteria for
revenue note financing and discu.sion on the role the Planning Commission
has in the review of revenue not financing applications.
• Commissioner Barrett withdre his motion.
Commissioner Eilefson sugges ed this item be discussed at the next
Commission meeting and a motion •e forwarded to the Council at that time.
Commissioner Sletten moved t e Planning Commission forward a letter of
thanks to the City Council for t e appreciation dinner.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - all.
11. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
12 ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:35 P.M.
4 -6 -81
7