HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 01-23 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7 :00 P.M., Monday, January 23, 1989
Municipal Administration Building
Meeting 89
(A) CALL TO ORDER
(B) ROLL CALL
(C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
(D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA
E -A APPOINTMENTS
1. H.R.C.
(E) CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Claims
2. Final Plat: Maidment Terrace
3. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 2405 Carver Avenue (Grand)
4, Budget Change: Curbside Recycling
5. Change Orders for Park Improvements: 88 -2P
6. Replacement of Park Maintenance Person
7. Reappointment of H.R.C.
8. Purchase of Police Vehicles
9. Accepting Gift - Trinity Baptist
(F) PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P:M.. Conditional Use--` P_ormit Revision; Menards
(G) AWARD OF BIDS
(H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Clarification: Temporary Part -Time Employee Rates
2. Rules of Procedure
(I) NEW BUSINESS
i'
1. Recycling Update, Mike Heinz
2_. Insurance Coverage for Council
3. Southlawn Avenue: Project 88 -1.7 - Change Order 1
(I) NEW BUSINESS Continued
4. Beam Avenue West of T.H. 61 to County Road D, Project 88-1*2, Schedule
Public Hearin
5., Carey Heights Drive, Project 88-09 - Schedule Public He . arin
6. T.H. 61 Watermain, Project 87-44 - Change Order
7. Council-Staff Workshop .
8. Emergency Services Salarie's
(J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
(K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
20
30
40
50
a
70
8
9.
100
(L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
(M) ADJOURNMENT
El-q - /
40tion by Council
E n . d o r s e cl „, , , , , , , � ,
MAPLEWOOD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
January 10, 1989
To: Gail Blackstone
Staff Services Coordinator
City of Maplewood
A
From: Pat Williamson
Cha i rpe rson , HRC
At the regular meeting of the Commission on January 3, consensus
was reached to recommend appointment of two new commissioners:
Paul O. Sand and Carol H. Engel.
You have copies of the application forms. Should you need further
information, please contact me: 625 -4044.
MAPLEWOOD BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM
NAME f L. PHONE- /
ADDRESS �Q�`- �� . R �=
� ZIP-�� /=
1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood?
2) Does your employment require travel or being away from the community which would
make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes No
3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (check)
Community Design Review Board
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
i Human Relations Commission
Park & Recreation Commission
Planning Commission
Police Civil Service Commission
4) Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope
of responsibilities?
/cam'•'"! �.'Z'-C�v`-C. -.'� j '�-,� '�'�i^�'�' "- `"'�- - ,= :.�z -'� � ' �� �- C������ - lJ�- �- +C�t- C� -�1� y j �'s'l �c� '4 ".:�• � �-��
CVYY Yirt�r�` Alm'
•iii E,��Z/?.f , � � ~Y� 1�- 'C��t' C'� '� �•� '�'Y1Cc2� -; 0`-- -- ,�1,.' -,� 00-1
5)
5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an
active participant:
I-E4GCtC C)" U)04, EA) V07E ?S
6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission?
U9�-c �,,n
l
IJ4�
�,Q�a� -�f! e� ce� GLO - Gvc.� c� `/ � � � � ,zc•c�2cs��
V
Would regular attendance at meetings be difficult? Yes No
On which board or commission are you interested in serving? List 6, number 1 being
9
your first choice:
COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PLANNING COMMISSION
H lu MN RELAI A.ONS COMMISSION POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
If this is a Renewal Application, total number of meetings held on your board or
commi ssi can this past year?
Education
Pr
01
How many have you mi ssed?
Number of Years _T 4"
New Applicants only: PreJious job experience and employers: (list last three)
ecib
.List Organizations or Clubs in the Community in which you have been, or are an
active participant:
M
0
Nov ��
t* �iEIT:
CSo
EF�cA 1 . pat7;' Z
B ckground x erience in any of the 6 ards or Commissions, if any:
N4
0 00000or
Why would you like to serve on any of these boards or commissions?
j3E; �l �j �iF ELK �li � � r, o F A �I v��i /✓I('�
Te C1 �uM9�/IC'•'8�
c��CRT"o �v . G�or 1ss s� o s Fo �► �1,4.yy
'3J �91� Z' �•�; E ✓6 T AdL�
Zia ;�pE so^r-
5
n
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: January 18, 1989
Agenda Number E-1
Action by Council.:
Endorsad._...
Mo d i f i e d.....,�.........,,�,
Rej eote
42 Date
It is recommended that the Council a pp rove payment of the followi ng
ng claims:
ACCOUNTS P
$ 625, 904.89 Checks
#8621 -
#8664
Dated 01 -03 -89 thru 01 -11 -89
174,713-61 Checks #5297 -
#5357
Dated.01 -23 -89 (1988 Expense)
$ 123,420.33 Checks #5245 - #5287
Dated 01 -23 -89
$ 924,038.83 Total er attached voucher/check •
p ucher /check register
PAYROLL.
$ 160,802.64 Payroll Checks
$ 30,953.14 Payroll Deductions
$ 191,755.78 Total Payroll
$1,1151794.61 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
DFF : kaz
0
VOUCHREG
01 / I /8 `--' 09:11
I CITY OF MAPLEW)OD
V0L)C1-1L-R/CliE*.Cl<.' REGISTER
PAGE I
2 VOUCHER/
- -- -------
3 C Id E C L
v EXD 1-1 R
C H i- C. K
v f-' N ri A Fl
I I
L-
4 NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
F5 2 9 7
---.D 10 -b-Z fb
z
1 9
-AL-L-1 1A R D W A R L-
E R 0 6 L., A to !3- 11 E, El
7
MTCE MATERIAL
12 .8 15
8
9
MTCE MATERIAL
2 M A L I Y f7i f 11--
74.99
21-67
10
suppl. I Es OFF ICE
3.29
11
MTCE MATIE-"RIAL
11.77
12
112EL IES-VEHICI E
AZ - U91
13
MTCE MATERIAL
73.30
14
SUPPLIES )AN
2.5.50
15
S I I p p E 171 J-J f. p
4 --19
146
WTCE MATERIAL
18.98
17
SUPPLIES JAN
39.Z7
407.03
19 522 9 8
0 4 15 0 0
01/2,3/89
A RTS I G N
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
28.75
20
21
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
3.16
31.91
22
9 9
061900
01 /Z 8 9
B A TT E R Y TIRE ViAREh-OLJ,.-*-E
A
SUPPLIES VEHICLE
46.80
23
24
•
SUPPLIES VEHlkr.*L.E
290.82
337.62
5300
080900
0 1 /#' 3 8'
BOARD OF WA'I'ER COMMISSIONERIS�
I 3,-s 0 1.:'R0,:, T
7.26
26
1830 E CTY RD 0
49.20
27
za
63STERLING
6.48
29
30
1685 GERVAIS
IRAR
12.12
31
OTHER CONST COST
2-11 19 z a
32
33
OTHER CONO
01WER CONS1 CO23 1S
272.7,0
i I !Ps
34
OTHER CONST COSTS
I
1539.00
35
36
FEES FOR SERVICE
A CONSI
11006.50
37
38 5301
39
090500
01/23/89
BRACKE LOUIS
FEES FOR SVC
606.00
605.00
40
53042.
41
0 9 0 5 5:3
0 1 3 E-39
BRAUN I'l-NGINLIE-RING TE.S.'TING,
OLITSID[i ENG FE k:;
84-9.60
849.60
42
43
LI
I-E. 0 W IS Ll L »t -1 W G
5.04
45
1 J. 1. 1 0
01. 3 9
CHIPPEWA SSPRINEiS
FEES FOR SCRVICE
1&2'* 8 0
1 :x.07
46
5 :305
47
140100
01 8 -9
CLARK B-f-iARDMAN LTD.
BOOKS
47 .75
47.75
413
4
F= f I & S E W, V I C'
F.
49
FEES F'Of,',, SERVICE
35
FEES SERVICE-7
3 5
St
F f� E':'-,' E 1-1 R R V I C E
410
tiz
53
53 0 7
54
14 C) 0 0
0 1 13. 9
C 0 L L I N I C-1
R L'*-'P A I R M A 1'. N T E Q U I PM N
a 9 5
ti
56
4ja
5:30 8
14:.*:'1 9 0 0
'f) A L E Y A 'F
l- -'E - l-` FOR SVD
8.4.00
wo,
V 0 LJ C H R E. G T y 0 f- Melt
Pool L., E w 0 IJ D PAG E
t 01/ 1,_//a9 09 "101j H R c I r ! CJ " RE C" I S T R
-0*N
%w�
V 0 U H E R
3
K
v P, N 1) Ell
.... . .... .
L
V FN D A R
l
NUMBER
N LJM B E' R
1) A TE
N A Iq E
D E S C". R I PTI 0 N
AMOUNT
7
AMOUNT
FEES Ff-',N' S-VD
4 0 0 -
FEES FOR SVD
823. 4 0 0
834.00
15 --1, a 91
2 f%, 0 F, Q o
Q I 1 3 1 A 9
E A 5; 1 U 11 N -1 Y/ I I N E EIRE LE21-
F-liEl ull-
10
11 531. 10
3 070 0
01 /23/'8-9
E A IS "f 11) E G T C.
'C)UPPLIES VEHICLE
7 . 6 8
37.68
13 1
230900
01/23/8'--,�
EASTMAN KODAK CO.
1) LIPL I C A TI N16 COSTS
1.14.78
1.1
15
DUPLICATING CO STS
D 11 IR L 1 C-` A I If W G CFJ 2 1 S
98 .
4,!R 12
16
D U P L. I C A T I N G
-
311.54
17
D U PL I C A T I N Cii COSTS
1)
180.37
19
D U P L. I C. A T 1 N G COSTS
426.32
lu
2 1
DUPLICATING C 0 Stj T S
393.53
11639.69
5:3 12.
2.31500
0 1 J Z 3 8':J
EDEN SYST%..'MS INC.
EQUIPMENT PURCHA.i-,l:-:D
41060.00
!4
EQUIPIlLN'l Of- FICE
P 17-1111 r4 I:-. hi "J' C)
3,850.00
7-12 4 2
;;
16
5 3
240 7.3. 0
01 ;'t; :J /2. 9
ENE)'---'. AK CONS RU CT 1 ON ("mO
LAND I M P R 0 V E M 1--N'[*
L. A Al 14 R E m 1 414
61616.28
2 4 9
7 4*-'--!
1
Z9 5314
10
2501- 7
0 1 '2�. 3 E,9
ERHART 'TOM
_0
PROGRAM REGISTRA'HON
16 7 -
12-00
7 5 0
12.00
31
5315
32
270300
0 1 /23 3'9
E=L X I E3 1. E PIPE f'O 0 L
LIFP VEHICLE
285-84
33
MAINT MATERIAL
393-74
679.58
34
35 5316
3 0.2, 9 0 0
01/23/89
GL1---NWOOD INGLEWOOD
FEES FOR SERVICE
61.41
61.41
B 2, i 7
37
14 H A
is
FEES F--OR SERVICE
3.50
39
PROGRAM SUPPI-117--ro'
1 46
19.25
4 0 ()b 0
01 1' 4 ► 9
HEALTH R E S 0 1) RE E S
fE FOR S ERVICE
13
F EES V - 0 f, Si E R V I C E
13 3:--.'
-.3
[::'EEG F 11F,' Y RV I C E
--F 4
42:'6. 6
li
FE E,-; FO R E R V I C E'
26 - 6 1"D
F E E cS 1-:'0 R 'SERVICE
13 . '334 3
F E E S F: ER V I C E
13.33
5319
J7() 1. 0
0 1.
HUICHIN,Z':0N,, ANN
P FZ0 k3 tk A M 1.1 P P 1. 1
9 o
3.90
53
0 1
DETROIT Dllit-jEl-
U P PL I VE H I C. L E
`50.00
��.1650.00
7
sa
55
4,44
K ly, A
A f*"T
7
56
7
0 0
f:", E* SH A J'h Ll- I
P R 0 (1 f -�` A M `31i P Pl- I E
74.75
7
7
7*4 75
VOUCHRE-G CITY f-IF tf1APt.FW0l'-1 D F--,
.3 1 S TE R
01/18/8.9 09: 11 VOUCHER/CHE.CK Ri*-.---'c`
2 VOUCHER/
3 H V,
VENDOR
C H F: (.*. K
VENDOR
--11 Em
4
4 N U M L: E R
5
NUMBER
D AT E
NAME
I) E S C R I PT 10 N
A M f- UlNf
AMOUNT
5 -3-52- -3
460600
01 1 12 9
A I I 1- 0 S'l I E-1 P Y
21 11 P 2 v E HT C I--- F
Z4 - 9U
7
Z4 0
7
8 5 :324
9
511250
--LEE3
01/23/89
-
MARTIN LtJMB.I.--.R
PROGRAM SLJPPLf1--.-*S
121 .77
.:�1
9
to
121 .77 11
t2
10
5
11
511750
0 1 /;R3/SQ
MAUTZ PAINT COMPANY
JANI 1-f--jR TAL.
e
-7 2. 4. 42-
13
7 4 14
12. 51 • r 6--5-
2-e 2 6 0 0
2 *21. Z IS 9
MIDWEST ANIMAI SERVICE
A N I M A, L r; A NT R,
-796 11"0
2,9 16
13
14 53•7
is
600210
01/23/89
M. 1". 1 D I ST R I 1-3'LIT I NG CO
SUPPLIES Vf.-'HIC:I..E
56,0'
17
le
56.09 19
70
16
5328
17
610850
01/23/89
MUSKA ELECTRIC CO •
REPAIR & MAINT..B
72.84
21
72.84 zz
18 7 9
6 40 5 9 0
0 1 1 .7 -31 1 ED' 9
N I`* I S. 0 N .1 E AN
VEkl A' I 171W
15 - 4.4
23
15 4 4 24
19
20 5330
21
660•00
01 2:3/:39
NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF
OUTSIDE ENE FEES
Iffil
21063.81
66- 0
25
26
V
28
22
23
U29
"I'l L I T I ES
128.10
-Z- 5 7 9 1 30
24 523 1
67,Q5s)o
01122/29
S O NE
NITTE--N LAVF'R
Z
11NIE-013M.1--1 ;- CA OTH
Z U
31
Cl 0 32
25
26 5332
27
680600
01/23/89
OCTOPUS CAR WASH
REPAIR MAINT VEH.
REPAIR MAIN I-VEH-
6.13
I -
33
34
35
36
ze
REPAIR MAINJ' -VEH.
:147 . 1
37
38
29
30
REPAIR-' MAINT VEH.
REEATR MAINT VEH
4-4.52
39
40
31
REPAIR MAINT VEH
12.26
41
4Z
32
33
REPAIR MAINT VEH
6.13
453.62 43
44
34
35 5333
690400
01/23/89
OLSON GEOFF
VEHICLE ALL.0WANt'-'.f.-'
2
45
24.44 46
36 5
5 4
F-1 s- o
01 /223/29
21 C R E E N-JT-L-' H
E�RELGA3,A M S 1 -11? P
I fio . 8
47
U 48
37
49
38
151
39
711100
01/23/89
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MlNNFi,-.-OTA
PROG SUPPLIES
39.87
50
39.87 51
52
40 5:3 :36
41
741300
0 1 / '2i". / 8 9
RAMSEY CLINIC
FEES FOR SERVICE
46.00
46.00 53
54
42 5
J227
741-560
0 1 Z 2 3 Z En' 9 RAMf-j-L-'Y---C-(W TY
EEF.Si EAR SVC,
4 2
ss
56
43
as
POSTAGE
5 2,"* 3 0 5
662 •53 57
58
45 5 ilks
141 700
01 12-3-12149-
R-A-MSEY C:F-IiiwIy
MAIN1 MAJ*E-RlAl--
1 1 2 2 -rn !�j 5
59
60
46
LEGAL F I S%CAL.
:31 5 6
61
62
47
F E E S FOR SERVICE
2-97 Z9
1 1 6 ice} 6 8 0 63
64
49
5339
50
742900
01123189
RAY DAVIS SONS
SLJF-"P[.IES JANITORIAL
6.89
65
6.89
51 524 fj
7 A 0 Q
0 1 Z-22. /2'2�
I'RAVEI TRAIN
67
2 fj - Q Q 68
52
53 5341
54
8001.75
01/23/89
S. E. Fi.
OUTSIDE ENC-*t FEES
0113lilDE: ENG
1.4. Fi 6
i 3 1 2-1
69
70
71
72
55
OUTS IDI..". ENG FEES
10 1
73
74
56
57
E
&..'48 .14
75
76
V 0 LJ (.": H f-Z E Gi C: I T Y 0 F 11 A F, L E 11J 0 0 1)
i1/ 18 9 i9y 11 V 0 LJ ("' H E f E C K R E ('3' 1 S. T E R
PAGE 4
VOUCHER/
NUMBER N
N U M.L-., E R D
D A TE N
NAME D
DESCRIPTION A
AMOUNT A
■
OUTSIDE ENG FEES 1
11033.65 1
15,718.79
15:'"-.'4 A
A cj(,) 4 uo 0
0 1 1 3. 1 9 S
SEVE'N A[J: HARnWARk" E
E-11EE-1 TES LQU Z
Z:R - o Fi z
z 12 - 0 F;
0
5343, s
slooto 0
0 1 3 / 8.:a S
S'-HAFFER CONS'TRUI,-'.-f- ION I NC C
CON'FRACT PYM.
3
5344 8
831.600 0
01 u/89
SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS S
SUFIPL.IES OFFICE 7
73.75
4 S
SUPPLIES OFFICE 1
174.22
2 2 P. 4 2
6
7 /
`-3 4 0 8 0 0 0
/'-.'9 S
ST.PAUL RAMSEY MEDICAL. (-`-EN*('1"-..R
FEES FOR 'SERVICE 5
54.72 5
54.72 2
2
9 2
841100 0
01/23/89 S
ST.PAUL. STAMP WORKS S
SLIFIP Of*.'FICE 1
164.50 �
2
2 2
843500 0
01 /w: /89
STREICHE--'RS GUNS U
US, 1.) F'P 1. 1 ES R A N (.-i E 1
1. 12'5 . 00 3
2
6
5: -:49 8
860100 0
01 /2 - ( /E-.9
T. J. AUTO PARTS S
SUPP VEH 5
58.86 5
58.86
5:350 8
860650 0
01/23/89 T
TARGET STORES S
SUPPLIES OFFICE 1
14.99 3
3
SUPPLIES OFFICE 3
36.4.5 5
51.44 3
4
5351 8
863100 0
01/23/89 T
T.K.D.A. O
OUTSIDE ENG FEES 8
8.27.6Z 4
4
;3 O
OUTSIDE ENG FEES 6
660.36 4
4
OUTSIDE ENG FEES 1
11686.40 4
4
0 U T' c%j* I D E ENG FEES 3
33.82 8
81683.83 4
4
7 4
882500 0
01 2 3 9 T
TWIN CITY TESI-ING O
OUTS I DE ENG FEES 5
54-0.00 5
4
U N I F ORMS C L 0 T F1 7
73.70 5
5
,2 U
UNIFORMS C L 0 T H 2
261.60 5
5
5
5 5354 9
910400 0
01/23/89 V
VAN PAPER COMPANY P
PROGRAM SUPP :
:3 7 .5 0 3
5
5.*339 5 5
-
-QU &
&
. ,_.._ ^^
..,_
i .,. ... _._.....
-- -.._ _.. ___.._ _. _._.. _,... _. .. _ -`- __ .... .:w.,• „,,«
ter.. ..+..r "....,,M
..,y
,
Vt_tUC•HRLG
CITY
� -t F� ��i A �' {_. i�: lei t_.1 ��t l:�
J
7
. 1 / i ��� � ':.
_
.. 1
_ '-
Y t...•Lli 1'1�: Rt CHi: C.K REi:i 1 S i ER
PAGE 1
i
z
VOUCHER/
t
4
5
-L' N L)
C:
Y
NUMBER
NUMBER
f)AT'E
NAME
tjESC:RiP*r10N
AMOUNT
r
AMOUNT E
6
i1 1�� ;. ! : '=�
i 1 "t 'I T A i-i E= �: OE Y . ; -
;
7
_
5w
5
f
9
01/03/89
UNIVERSITY OF MINNEw+...tfA
TRAVEL TRAIN
1
�y
10
it
'"; 6. 12::i
720600
0 1 / 0 •J / E-39 �
P t:l S T {Y{ A r' ] t R
P T ru E
31000.00 `
12
I I o
- ---.� J } "' 1 �.L�1
r a- a a►- r -. - r
,
13
14
1
t5
Ili: 62 5
9004-00
:1 /03/89
UNIVERSITY OF MINNE: SOTA
TRAVEL. `RAIN
115.00
1.15.00
1 b
17
i «' .1 t. r��
460450
F
}
1 /(-'3/89
Of-'-"., , ,
1� [
LE AGUE ��L- MINNESOTA C• I _� I,_S
i ST - ,-
_
I N._,URANiCE
4Z,171.6-1-
2
4Z :171 .67 2
i 2
2
20
A
z
21
86.-8
5141400
01/04/89
MI NN « STA.LE TREASURER
::i i A �i ". �.�Eti � � L_i�. �"��;�
669.50
6 6 d . 5 0 Z'
22
23
-
8% :':r
5414-00
{�� 89
/ /
Ml NN . TATE:. ThEA �!.1i�E���
T'i�t�,l�E:1.. ��: TFtF�J fV
30.00
21
z,
30.00 31
24
25
_
_
R E A Ll Q L R
14 LJ 10 ' r -
- 37
'
26
_
3:
27
'
8631
9 4.00
01 /U4 /8 f1
MINN. . STATE TREASURER
�'FATEw I�Fc:f 1f !_IC: E E:E:. �
6Z:3. 5�
��:� . �U 35
Z8
29
30
4 = -'
f F�'
4/
� ; ! �
Nt.-tRi 1*HERN STATES t-twWIE'R
' t
OUTSIDE t: NG FEES
11600.00
m
37
1 , 640 . u0 m
39
32
33
634
140400
01/05/833
CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
t�:NTY' DR LIC FEES PAY
100.00
41
42
34
100.00 43
�r^
35
86 i ~1
0 { 9 P 0
01/05/89
A F P l E B E E ' S am % 1{ AUFAN ^
FEES S VC
A
445
98 ab
`,F
37
i-- -
", A w
-
48
38
38
551500
u 1 / 15 / _
MN POLLUTION CONTRO_
1- R A V / T R (
49
5 0
ct» �;
1 � C� � ' 51
ao
41
32
;:;r,,:38
541406
01 /0b /;=9
MINN. �TAT'E TREASURER
MOTOR
M T K VEH i._IC: PAY
�,84.� .00
5z
53.
8,847'.UG 54
43
+�
F
i
`4t - --
1vt 1 h 1 h 1 (� j! � L h _
t"t. #-fatty , -' -a 414 F. -E ���� L h _ �� '' LL1 LLi -- - - -- - - - - - --
' -. { , -
-
444.99 ss
44
45
_' _ 4 0
} 'a__
� =
i..•
L J iH:R A ti .� ~ IA. SER V CS
FEE FOR SYC
1 , 0 a:. r`J0
57
1100Z.00 59
46
86 ' 4
;�; i t {_� r j � } 0
01/06/89
S U 1- C : R A 1 `i C: R I C• ! l
ACCTS Y
2
00
61
4d
1 .3
1.51 r Vii- 62
..--
-- •r s - ' -' '
( yy�� � r_
so
51
'.' _�
1. •
t / try 'w�-
��
j� j y� r j� '( j� ` L1
i� ri ["
U U E T J �_t T H R GOVT .
r
1 �: , :�'r1 F; . � 1
65
2 ! , 7 4 1 , ��; �� 66
52
53
54
8644
54•i =1 {tt�
- -
- ik ^f �y r�'w� -^"'ritir-
ti j./ {fir /, „_�
_, '8' •
ri-{�� d -ti4 F 4sr 1 4� i ? . f'-s- -^ -
,. ,�.,.._, - l.l('1 J =�
M 1 N 1� S F h_ A
i �i f C. Si J i
�yj j
1' 1 1tir 4-� ' 4E �^ 1 7_"Z'S. i _ 1.
t (� ( t j r -- 7 J l L j,
iJ k A �- C_ D �, i Y C. R tJ L. I �. i� E S P �_
L . 68
_
='
_• 69
70
71
C.^ 1_+ �
9 5
� � � ,
�
56
�t
ti.t i -� ..�.
{ � t ,...' .
��� N 1't . �;: t "' /� E2 K. A ,::, .::, t_� t..• I fii ! .� i.i �i
� �{ �-.___.__�.._._._�.- _.__._ ._._.. _.______.._._.._. -._.. _..........._
_..._.._
73
57
wt,:,•�, .
583.00 74
75
76
_'W 0 0"
VOUCHREG CALTY Of" M Af t. L D PAGE Z
T E`
1-11'
2 VOUCHER/
3
3 CH E C K
V E N DO R
r HE CK
Vf-_XailR_
I 'I EN
E M
4
4 NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE.
NAME
DES CR I PTI 0 N
AMOUNT
A m ou �i 1, 5
6
6 36 4 A
1 90400
0 1 / 0 6 fit
D F El 1 01. E N A I Ll R A 1- R E S, f I H R S, E
1) N R L I C EN S E 2 Fil 1
1 9 - 00
7
1 :jI - C) Ci
7
A ED 6 47
160200
01/06/89
COLLINS Kl�NNETH V.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
8-.:14 94
to
-3 4 ■ 9•`l 1
lz
10 8648
5 109 0
0 1 0 9
MAPLEWOOD STATE BANI`
FICA PAYABLE
6 (1) 6 2.
13
14
FED INC: I'Av/% PAY
E* 11 A N T R T F: I I
17 969
E., U 1 6 2"
1 F, Z
13
14 ,649
is
541400
01/09/89
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH Ll(:• FEES
11,047.50
17
to
11,047.50 19
20
16 8650
U?
541400
01/09/89
MINN. STATE TR�_-"ASURER
(3, 'T A F E E 131
TE DRIV 1.1%C.
586.50
21
186-50 zi
is. RAB 1
020400
Q I / 0 9 ZE; 2
13, L I I E L R (3 2- '3 1 - 1- 1 E S h I r-- I n
HEMA DED EAY
e
U 2
23
24
19
HEALTH LIVE DENTAL
614-00.93
25
20
21
A/R INS CONT
463.14
81896.39 V
28
22 0,652
3'20;':i00
01/09/89
GROUP HEALTH INC.
HCMA DED PAY
11902.66
29
30
23
24
HEALTH LIFE DENTAL_
AIR rw!:�, CANI
'7164-9.14
31
32
25
26 8653
810100
01/09/89
SHARE
HCMA DED PAY
11070.06
33
U
35
27
HEALIH 1-TEE ENI"Al-
5 • 4 A
36
28
29
A/R INS CONT
8 twt 5 2 9
37
31708.81 38
30 P. f-, Fi 4
1 4 1 1 rm
01109189
COMERCA AL- Ll EE INS1113ANCE INC -
I TEE INS EAY
0
39
40
31
Hk-.'MA DED PAY
327.62
41
42
32
33
HEAL'Hi I- IFE DENTAL
AIR INS CONI
585.05
43
LJ f 44
34
35 8655
m
500600
01/09/89
MADISON NATIONAL LIFE
L *1` D INS
11948.33
45
146
11948.33 47
48
37 -
656
38
560100
01/09/89
MN STATE COMMISSIONER
STATE INC TAX PAY
71203.35
49
7 1203. 35 so
39
510900
0 1 10 9 Z OR
L EW Ll 0 1) ES I A TEE P, A N K
W A ri E 1) E 1)
15 0
52
40
53
41 83 6 5 8
42
0304,00
u1 10 /8`M
ANDERSON, CAROLE
TRAVEL 3: TRAIN
PROGRAM Si-I .ti PLIES
3.50
I F 3
54
55
56
43
c
SUPPLIES OFFICE
5.60
57
so
44
45
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
p R I T L S F_, F, T r_l i"
8.21,31
1
59
34-91 60
46
47 8659
48
5301500
01/10/89
ME T R 0 WAS CONTROL COMMl'.:l)SN
SEWAGE TREATMENT
11 4:"--,. 9 14
61
62
112 4-239 . 14 63
6a
49
8660
50
541-400
01/10/89
MINN. STATE T R �--.A S u r-,, i- R
STATE DRIV LIC FEES
50
65
768■50
67
51 P, A A 1
.941 400-
0 11-1-0 9
--- MINN, S-Tk-lr7- I a En- 25 11 R E R
M i-i T 0 R V Eli 1 1" E F IS,
.-IR 9 ' ^' 21 4 0 0
324 .00 68
52
53
c-3662
54
541-400
01/1.0/89
MINN. STATE I -REASURER
M R, V f: H t. I C F F.." L' S
87 0
69
70
8 1 71-:-J . Oo 71
72
55
8663
5341400
01/11/189
MINN. S'1*ATE I A S 1. i R 1 .:- R
S 7' A T D R I V L I C 1!E
15.00
73
715.00 74
75
76
V 0 U CH R !:-:'. G I 'IfY 0F M A (--, t.. E W C-1 1'--) D PAGE 3
01 / 1 .13 / IS, 9 0 9 .01 13 V 0 U H 1----'R If! C H E C K R Gi I S Tf-..
V" I -I P a, F.-. V,, T Cl 11 1 ZL
V OU CHE R
3
r
C, LIR
T 1L- W
4 NUMBER
5
N111'1 BE R
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
6
0 1 11 1 car' --91
-ALk S 1<0 R 1 11 B L. R -
R
E E L- L` 0 L R I I E
42
--
7
ACC PAY
199.00
341-00
9
4 F,
021 600
C) I 12 fl Z L; 9
A ta E R' I C- A N W A TLE WORKS
.1r.-.1112, a WLIARIPRSHE
5 1:11 - 0 u
52 - clo
10
5 4 6
12
042250
U I /:_.: /,_,9
ASSOCIATION OF MN EMERG MGMGR
SUB & MBRSHP
ZO.00
:.0 . 0 0
13 52". 4 7
14
10114.00
01/23/89
BUIL.D('-.RS SQUARE
5Z,j, f) R E
r,-,MALL TOOIL-S
2- 11 R R-1 2- 1 A WT -f, b R
171.10
19
171.10
1 9 4 2
16
17 5 4
14 9 42- 5
0 1 3
DANN[-.fZ INC.
CONTRACT PAYABLE
104 1 807 1
104.1 80.7 . 2 1
19 5250
lboolo
01 /23/89
C. 0 A S T T0 C. 0 A S r S TO R E 6. 8
SUPPLIES VEHICLE
279.92
279.92
21 F,
I- !R O;Z j) Q
1 1 jk, 1-:1
nj:ET CIE R N
I A R' A. n
FLE'S SERVICE'
I cl 0
11) 0 0
zz
23 5252
24
210050
01 /23/89
DODD TECHNI,,-',.AL CORP.
SUPPLIES OFFICE
f,URRI TLS OPEITCE-
47.87
pp
25
26 5253
27
230400
01/23/89
EAST COMMUNI,rY FAMILY
FEES FOR SVC;
IZ$500.00
12, 150U.0 0
28 5254
30
240111
Fi fj
01/23/89
ELECTRIC SCIENTIFIC CO.
YWL
REPAIR MAINT EQUIPMENT
EE-* L-�S V 171 R q L R V
62.50
0 0 Ll
62.50
10 00
31
32
51256,
33
310300
01/23/$9
GOODYEAR TIRE COMPANY
REPAIR MAINT VEHICOL.E
7.95
7.95
M
5 5 7
35
320960
01/23/89
REIKO HARE
BOOKS
20.00
20.00
36
5 F. 2
121 3 It 8 9
HAIDER, KEN
1RAVEL TRAI-a
uc)
C) 0
37
38 5259
39
35-1 08 75
01/23/r9
HOFFMAN CORNER OIL
FUEL OIL
34.50
34.50
40
5 60
41
391390
01/1: .3 8 9
INTER. ASSOC. CHIEFS OF POLICE
SUB MBRSHP
1U0.0U
100.00
42
43
1. Q;Z
9 ........
. ecA W--E-R. ii0-T-EL----
lR A •V/ I R Ci
5262
45
4304.00
01 8,9
KNOY, LUMBER
MAINT MATERIAL.
16.61
16.61
46
47 3
b-00030
0 1 8 9
M.P.E.L.R.A.
SLJE.;/MBRI HP
8,5.00
85.00
413
M L W T -
0 f-2 1� W
49
'1'• =65
511600
01 1.3, 9
MASYS CORP
REPAIR .8% MAINT/E
s
11132.00
52
53 52:66
5 2 0 9 0
0 1 3
M E 11 A C i (I B, A R L--' A R A F 0 1\1 1:`E R 1-
S U 1-3. / Mf-..'R S H P
25 00
25.00
55
8
P F� f I u j--.- I
t 4 1 N i L- 0 A US f.-a-k -Ilf! J L' 24--
1 G N F., R S H R
15 0 U
56
�57 b 6 ;2:
5 5 0;'.-, 0 0
0
M N CH I L"^ LJ F P 0 L. 1 1` A:S 0 i
7% U B M f-.*,. Rr:3 F!
60.00
7
60.00 7
7
VOUC,HREf3 F F Y 0 m A p L.. J Skl f-I n PAU
1) E 4
0 1 / I Ei: 09 1.3
VOUCHER/
3
C El F_C_K
3
4
4 NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE'
NAM E
rS C R I F`F 0 N
A M 0 [i NiT
AMOUNT
1;
5 2*
F�-S () 4 Q) 0
=
Uk
M R p Ilp
7
7
51`'7 { :)
5" 5 1 lel 5 0
01 /23/89
MN NATURALISTS
ll"3 U1*11 M B, R S H p
0
30 0
if) 5f::71
ft
5 5 1.
U1 8`:?
MN PAFW%: SUPFRVISORS ASSOC
TRAV / T RG
1 0
14
5 2 7*,--'
5 A 0 A
0 1 Z 2 23, 9
M N S I R E E ' SUE-J,�_ U-0 C I A J* 10 N__
s U
2_0 0
13
13
14 5273
Fr -,1. 10 0
01/23/89
MN WASTEWATER C)PEPZATORS ASSOC
S UB M B RSH P
10.00
1.0 . 00
17
5 *21 7 4
17
630400
01/23/89
NATIONAL. ENVlR0Nrll.-_-_N FAL HEAL.TH
Sl_JJBS & MEMBIE.R
50.00
50 ■ 0
1-2
18 2 z F;
617,C) 9 0 Q
0 1 Z 2:3 Z 81 2
N Cl .l LS, P A Lf L — K&E' I F W 0 A D R'171 'r A FLE
Ll F,/ N E, R S EA E
9. c) 0
23
24
'5
5276
711500
01/23/89
PHOTOS TO GO
SUPPUES EQUIPMENT
7 . "-112
76
2 7
12
_--f�EES' Efill
2
.3, 7
(, C
28
!3
tA 5277
7.:..0510 e`
01/23/89
POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
S U81 MB RS_y*H P
25 ■ 00
E, . 0 0
30
31
32
.5 5278
740900
0 1 /23/8 9e
RADIO SHA(-.'K
SUIPP E"QUIP
51.89
51.89
3,
-7
RAMSEY C1111t4lY L-EA-f-WE OF I OCAI_
3F,()-. 0 u
35
36
:8
17
9 52610
7 4.2* 110
0 1/ 423 / 8 9e
RAMSEY EML-.'RG. MEDICAL SERVICES
OUTSIDE RENl EQUIP
5 . 00
5.00
38
39
40
5281
• 5135, 0
01/23/89
R1 CHARDS
P ROC,3i R A M lcj:Li F'P 11. S
11 . 65
41
,3
P R 0 G RA"k lyl S 1-1 P P L I F.-i";3)
1. 0 ■ 8
22.33
43
44
5 5282
'T 80 10 0
0 1 / "2*. 3 / 8 9
S"D LOCK S A F E
cl'!J P P J AN
37.10
37 . 10
'15
49
50
7
3 U P p L. I E 0 F: Fl C. E 518.60
7 2-.
9
0 F,
62, 1 Q Q
51
52
53
5c:.'_,51 *
2
9 0 0 1 2� 5
01 /23/89
LJNll'ED AR-FIST THEATRE
P R 0 (--i S' t J PP
0
54
4 b '6
900400
01 /23/89
- - -----
UNIVERSITY OF MINNE:"SOTA
T R A V 'F R (:'t*
1. =0.00
56
57
5
T R AV /T R
0 0
5 9
60
61
62
52:37 0 6 0 0 01 /23/89 X E R 0 X' 0 R P ■ J) U P C. G T S:'
7 Ei . 4
,q
D p C 0 T
ci
0 2 12,
8 .74
2 15 2
63
64
0
D U P COSTS
4L (1 5
65
3
68
69
70
4
5
6
T -0-T-A i C, H
14 9 3 Z 5 2-2 73
74
75
7
71
7Z
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 12/30/88
CHECK #6707 - CHECK #6858
EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY
SLAVIK, THOMAS J.
11066.10
McGUIRE, MICHAEL A.
21538.46
BLACKSTONE, GAIL
11374.10
ZAWACKI, KATHRYN
915.70
BEHM, LOIS N.
942.11
JAHN, DAVID J.
781.48
SWANSON, LYLE
971.58
CUDE-, LARRY J.
242.40
OSTER, ANDREA J.
822.28
MIKISKA, WILLIAM
157.60
FAUST, DANIEL F.
11934.90
TAYLOR, LINDA
11011.08
MATHEYS, ALANA K.
972.69
VIGNALO, DELORES A.
954.28
ANDERSON, CAROLE J.
11190.28
LA MOTTE, MARLENE
220.00
AURELIUS, LUCILLE E.
1,788.50
SELVOG, BETTY D.
217.00
SCHADT, JEANNE L.
952.71
KELSEY, CONNIE L.
524.49
HOSCHKA, GERMAINE
632.68
VIETOR, LORRAINE S.
953.83
HENSLEY, PATRICIA A.
492.58
CARLE, JEANETTE E.
807.16
RONGSTAD, CAROLEE
96.00
COLLINS, KENNETH V.
11996.50
RICHIE, CAROLE L.
823.88
SVENDSEN, JOANNE M.
973.37
NELSON, ROBERT D.
11735.70
FULLER, ELAINE
316.34
OMATH, JOY E.
839.08
MARTINSON, CAROL F.
848.68
ZAPPA, JOSEPH A.
1,561.48
STILL, VERNON T.
1,378.28
SKALMAN, DONALD W.
11507.44
NELSON, CAROL M.
1,780.97
MORELLI, RAYMOND J.
11355.20
STEFFEN, SCOTT L.
11479.92
ARNOLD, DAVID L.
11561.48
BANICK, JOHN J.
11403.69
BOHL, JOHN C.
11509.73
CAHANES, ANTHONY G.
11735.70
CLAUSON, DALE K.
1,403.88
MOESCHTER, RICHARD M.
1,455.66
ATCHISON, JOHN H.
1,403.88
YOUNGREN, JOHN
11589.87
PELTIER' WILLIAM F.
11561.48
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J.
11351.53
WELCHLIN, CABOT V.
11388.21
LANG, RICHARD J.
11438.40
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 12/30/88
CHECK #6707 - CHECK #6858
EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY
RAZSKAZOFF, DALE
11454.28
HERBERT, MICHAEL J.
11454.28
DREGER, RICHARD C.
11638.59
STAFNE, GREGORY L.
11473.09
BECKER, RONALD D.
11454.28
HALWEG, KEVIN R.
1,619.17
STOCKTON, DERRELL T.
11446.21
PAUL.OS, JR. , PAUL G.
11109.05
BOWMAN, RICK A.
11453.57
KARIS, FLINT D.
11537.77
HEINZ, STEPHEN J.
11620.45
GRAF, DAVID M.
11494.16
THOMALLA, DAVID J.
11561.35
PALMA, STEVEN T.
11174.80
VORWERK, ROBERT E.
1,614.55
BERGERON, JOSEPH A.
1,527.00
MEEHAN, J.
1,537.92
MELANDER, JON A.
11665.99
ENGEN, MARIA
443.54
MURNANE, SARAH
299.54
EMBERTSON, JAMES M.
11482.90
WILLIAMS, DUANE J.
11290.10
RABINE, JANET L.
11054.64
STAHNKE, JULIE A.
11028.92
BOYER, SCOTT K.
997.11
WALDT, CYNTHIA
733.48
RYAN, MICHAEL P.
11705.71
FEHR, JOSEPH
11070.92
NELSON, KAREN A.
11057.91
FLAUGHER, JAYME L.
11163.56
WEGWERTH, JUDITH A.
424.26
HAIDER, KENNETH G.
11934.10
CHLEBECK, JUDY M.
991.08
MEYER, GERALD W.
11296.49
KANE, MICHAEL R.
1,445.62
NAGEL, BRYAN
867.88
LUTZ, DAVID P.
11159.46
KLAUSING, HENRY F.
11180.74
SCHMOOCK, JOHN
11008.29
HELEY, RONALD J.
11127.56
OSWALD, ERICK D.
11050.76
FREBERG, RONALD L.
11219.43
CASS, WILLIAM C.
11596.68
L I NDBLOM, RANDY
853.48
ELIAS, JAMES G.
1,284,68
PECK, DENNIS L.
1,284.68
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
11215.08
IRISH, BRUCE A.
11521.48
GESSELE, JAMES T.
1,238.28
GEISSLER, WALTER M.
1,261.48
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 12/30/88
CHECK #6707 - CHECK #6858
EMPLOYEE NAME
METZ, TERRY
LOFGREN, JOHN R.
ODEGARD, ROBERT D.
BRENNER, LOIS J.
KRUMMEL, BARBARA A.
STAPLES, PAULINE
JONES, LUTHER
TRAVERS, DANIEL L.
ANDERSON, ROBERT S.
LINDORFF, DENNIS P.
GARRY , WILLIAM
HELEY, ROLAND B.
MARUSKA, MARK A.
BURKE, MYLES R.
GERMAIN, DAVID A.
STARK, R.
WICKLEM, B.
SHELDON, L.
KOEGEL, R.
JOHANEK, T.
BU RKHARDT , D.
PODPESKAR, K.
STROTH, T.
NARUSIEWICZ, M.
BESETH, JR., R.
.KING, S.
FISCHER, P.
MARIANA, B.
WARD, ROY G.
TAUBMAN,'DOUGLAS J.
GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M.
NELSON, JEAN
HORSNELL, JUDITH A.
HUTCHINSON, ANN E.
DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M.
BARTA, MARIE L.
OLSON, GEOFFREY W.
MISKELL, NANCY
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L.
GENEROUS, ROBERT
EKSTRAND, THOMAS G.
JOHNSON, RANDALL L.
OSTROM, MARJORIE
CARVER, NICHOLAS N.
WENGER, ROBERT J.
NADEAU, EDWARD A.
MULWEE, GEORGE W.
NUTESON, LAVERNE S.
BREHEIM, ROGER W.
EDSON, DAVID B.
GROSS PAY
853.48
1,003.06
1,797.30
1,018.03
419.54
1,499.88
72.00
94.50
1,059.08
1', 271.90
909.77
1,307.67
1,493.17
1,331.78
1,266.12
144.00
60.56
106.95
151.16
193.38
260.00
182.00
42.00
114.00
196.18
173.25
188.40
160.00
406.40
1,196.68
1,029.48
346.82
505.14
442.74
937.48
808.68
1,786.10
208.63
423.38
316.54
1,334.21
1,299.28
1,494.28
1,143.08
1,238.28
1,269.08
1,119.67
1,478.28
1,115.96
1,254.84
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 12/30/88
CHECK #6707 - CHECK #6858
EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY
------- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - --
MUL.VAN -EY, DENNIS M. 11217.48
SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 11014.28
------------
$160,802.64
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION
CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION
AFSCME 2725
MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988
METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC
MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
L. E. L. S.
Z1 $ 71102.29
Cl 22,466.00
U1 442.35
160.00
U3 18.00
Z2 238.00
P1 526.50
$ 30,953.14
GRAND TOTAL $191,755.78
TOx
FROMx
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT/OWNER:
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
MEMORANDUM
City Manager
Randall Johnson, Associate Planner
Final Plat
Carl Maidment
824 South McKnight Road
Maidment Terrace
January 9, 1989
SUMMARY
Action by Council-,
Re1
The applicant is requesting approval of the Maidment Terrace
final plat. This plat will create five single-dwelling lots and
a large remnant parcel for the applicant's home. (Refer to the
map on page 6.)
DISCUSSION
The applicant has complied with the conditions of preliminary
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Maidment Terrace final plat.
REFERENCE
Past Actions
J.0-26-87: Council approved the preliminary plat shown on page
6, subject to the following conditions:
1. Final approval of grading, uti1ity, drainage and erosion
control plans by the City Engineer for the entire site. The
grading plan shall include:
a. The style of dwelling and elevation of the foundations.
Changes may be made at a later date, provided the
changes are consistent with the content of the overall
b. The preservation of as many healthy trees as possible.
Trees to be saved shall be shown on the plan. A total
of at least 36 trees shall remain or be planted on the
site following construction.
C ft Al I impervious surf ace area shal 1 drain to the south U
d. The grade along the east property line shall be
consistent with that necessary for the future trail to
be constructed on the property to the east, with the
exception that the storm water sewer to be constructed
along the east line of the site is only required to be
constructed half way to the south boundary. A flared-
end discharge 1s permitted at this point. At such time
as the trail is constructed, it shall be the
responsibility of the developer of the southeasterly
portion of the Budd Kolby 2nd Addition preliminary plat
(page 5) to reconstruct this storm sewer, as necessary,
to accommodate a trail.
2. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement with the
required surety for all required public improvements. This
agreement shall include, but not be limited to:
a. On-site street and utilities.
b.Storm sewer slong the east boundary of the site from
Dorl and Road to a point half-way to the south line of
the site.
c. Tree planting, if necessary. At least 36 mature trees
must be on the site when finished.
d. Extension of utilities and street from the existing
temporary cul-de-sac and restoration of the yard area
affected by that temporary cul-de-sac. A portion of
that pavement may be left as a second driveway to 799
Dorl and Road following approval of a site plan by the
2
City Engineer. The site plan shall be the
resp*onsibility of the owner of 799 Dorl and Rcad . (The
owner of 799 Dorland Road withdrew this request.)
10-24-88: Council approved a one—year time extension for this
preliminary plat.
jl
Attachments
1. Location Map
2° Property Line/Zoning Map
3 . Preliminary Plat
4. Final Plat 08 1/2 x 11)
Final Plat (separate enclosure)
2
..
J
0 r
H
. M
�s
t•
.r
� r
LOCATION MAP
14
k
IS
�r
19
Attachment 1
•. '
IVA-
r
' 1 f f •+
• . �2 as • .3�'
o u.i, u.a s :,�9 q�� c>w :Hr
FN ERG
If
.39 - • �31 ^ 11 ��. •� � (•' 1 1, 1 •��\ -�
�1D0. . -
Celt ov
u4
1 p . d.1r •'1 V r Fi7� �♦ �1 14� .� ~�`' - • 1 ~,� l•- �_��lry 1 ,� " f• •-- b /✓
_ �t ♦ ,°s A`% E ° r -� •; Ali 1 \� -� .. �^ � /,- :f� t-•,. "r
ow tj
d . �� \. j .0 %W 4t 1
(144 j V I ' p irk 0 , • _ O ••I ! O • ��J�/ \•ti `,x'24 / • /• '` ` \ \�. ,�
,. 775 \� ,
or
- - 226 22 7.0 � w 799, . •— � � y _ _ �� s'� , j �; / -• � � /;� / ` `
2 2278 229b 2298, 1
• �, , 0 v, o . 4 2 %.—' 7--" f '• j�;'�/
I.-. 810. � •� ••``,, ` � �Nr •W�= _rr tip' - �. �' %r r �. /1 t•� • ••,/ •'' ,'/ ' +_.�`
• � '� Budd Kol by 2nd
' � {�:�;:•.; • ti.%� {�:•: vtiv r{•: •:::' •�'iY ::r {�: {:•. i! {•.yf '!�: �" • \ • � • „rte
Addition
�. : .:� • •' }'•> f:Y`rY 810 , —�- / •ww,v':
' i 824. r. i.: ,, •. t la' a •— r., �
Preliminary i m i n a ry P
. 1 •,:yjc►.• �ff : •.{;::ice ��;it���:: •i�. Y ••: '•L�,''•• � � � , �, • ��/ • � �; � ='` `-_,� : - �
' •.?,{ `;:; irk: ti: :�� • ? � : w '% 1►�` / /... ,/ter• i� \ \; \�,
• 40 {?tii�•f "{J'�, t, X L :: ; t+o- ,Y ?Y U, • M f f •f... .oc , i ?�� ' " \�"' / ` ` \ ` `
2321 2320 2314
• 4 ' .'�,f. I�i�-\:� �� / / /r / / {// `� •1471 fir•
° 2315 = ; ,�•` OUT�.O? A S ,. ` , ` \� ` Ap
:�J I OUTLOT C
4V T
of
V ,lop •*► ` , �' 1 /
12 7
O 4v.
7 .. ,.,._ .. - • • _ _ _ , - J , , �? ,I,, f j �i ; ;1j l : ��.� I ; �' ' � 'W Are mss'.✓
pt wow
15 14 Q II ( /
(3�) (�} �30) s1,4.OI ` 1 't/ I !i l •,/,: , //. i� �I��I.i��' 11 1 l ' //� �/
#07 100
V, 1003
L-- 1 T-� f TIMBER T o �
~ 1 kRiEL_IMINARY
(Ls T `� / JEFFERSON FOUR A IfiO
r I 2 3 4 / / ' ' ~• ZVvL /
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
5 Attachment 2
4
N
z •(cr / ..
A:
lb lo Ile
wC of
1
1 1 I
4 / >
lb�q
1 +
•
`�. , • ' _ _ _ EXIST. AfH
i
RE X956 20
r ♦ ice ` �ti` _ ' 1 • R.G INN 950.05
/ 1 � �' � mow•
PROPOSED SPLIT LINE', ''. '• �UOTILLIITY EASEMENT- 0 �''•� r ( �
% ♦� `� (TYRICAL) P. 1 i - • 4. 1.1ARK 5;,��►
• 1
I,, MDWpFF' Q' \
.r
. • . , • 1 / / ! "�vAlvE, y 10 ,
.. ..
Milt QASEMENT f SAO
% `• ,A / EIEVAT10N 1T7P4CAL?— •\
.�
�? • / SEE • NOTE . 1` / •r i ���\ 1 I •
loe 1.0 2
SEE
2 do
:,r• ��•• - ---- . •
• rM w r•` •
Area to remain u np 1 atted 1 o s' DRAINAGE d UTILITY
EASEMEMT ITYPVCAt;i /,` ' •..•.....�,t1,..
. • • wI' I 11? /
dov
♦ I
4 w ♦ �
PRELIMINARY PLAT
(Approved 10- 26 -87) 1
6 Attachment 3
/1
398.46
u.89 ° 5a t1 [.
9
T
9
r o
Z
N
l!� cn
� d
oc
o �
N �
� aN
a
o a a
Z I-w-
• s �
4- o
O,
V
`O Q
V
N
U
d �
Llt c)
s
•-�" O
O
cn -4-
4 3
N1
N o
a
L ^�
_. --
�
� *
�
^`
�.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECTS
LOCAT ION x
APPLICANT/OWNER:
DATE N
INTRODUCTION
MEMORANDUM
W_
Aetionby council*-
ftdoreed
Dat
City Manager
Thomas Ekstrand--Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit Renewal (Home
Occupation)
2405 Carver Avenue
Charlene Grand
January 9, 1989
Renewal ofaconditional use permit (CUP)tooperiteabeauty
shop home occupation~ The beauty shop is located in the walk-out
basement of the dwelling. The applicant is the only employee.
BACKGROUND
On January 12, 1987, r
Council granted appoval of this conditional
use permit, subject to,
l. At the end of one year, if there is no unresolved complaint
or nuisance, Council may renew this permit.
2. Compliance with the requirements in Section 36-66 (4) (b)
pertaining to the operation of a home occupation, except for
the sign location requirement~
3. Obtaining a building permit for all improvements.
Council also approved a sign placement variance for a ground-
mounted sign (code requires wall signs), because of the
dwelling's substantial setback from the street. This sign was
required to be set back at least 15 feet from the front lot line.
On January 11,1988, Council renewed the CLJP for this home
occupation, subject to the January 12, 1987 conditions of
approval and subject to relocating the ground sign to a 15-foot
setback by May 1, 1988.
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT
Section 36-442 (e) provides that all conditional use permits
shall be reviewed by the Council within one year of the date of
initial approval, unless such review is waived by Council
decision or ordinance. At the one-year, review, the Council may
specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five
(5) years, for subsequent reviews. The Council may impose' new
or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the
initial or subsequent reviews. A conditional use permit shall
remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are
observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the City from
enacting or amending official controls to change the status of
conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets the agreed-upon
conditions and is later disallowed because of the City enacting
or amending official controls shall be considered a legal
nonconforming use.
DISCUSSION
All conditions of the conditional use permit have been met. The
sign, however, was placed on a pole at the front lot line, not
15 feet back. Although this sign does not appear obtrusive in
any way, it does not meet the Council's variance requirement.
,
The applicant misunderstood the City Council's requirement that
the sign must be set back 15 feet. Ms. Grand has 'agreed to move
the sign in the spring after the ground thaws.
Renewal of the beauty shop home occupation at 2405 Carver Avenue
for five years, subject to the January 12, 1987 conditions of
approval, and subject to relocating the ground sign by May 1,
1989, to be 15 feet back from the front property line.
mb\Carver.mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2, Property Line/Zoning Map
PUO F
Lk
L INwOOC AVE _
R
F
V
• - -- 17
Z o Q
L I� _
Lo
` •
F (-
HIGH* 0 AVE _
MAMtE AVE BC
W
R ; R� F
W_ Q
7 }
� 18
W
Q
R fl
F �,►
R
C)
Q
F F
1
O fa M E
19
F
CRITICAL .°
o-
AREA
20
F F
/ :
J
FW
N
V /LL 4GE
OF NEWPOR.r
LOCATION MAP*
Attachmo.nt 1
4
N
N x�o -
83 at,
12 2 �� 1 '� 3.3 ate.
124
A ,� 0(10
f
N..
2�d Z 7
t 40 •T Z
,s t
N
r •f
..........
• a � arc r
� •
�t .� �.::�• : :::..�.: :
:
1
v. t4h
�7) 1268 16. EUT
At 2 fi• 2413
rTl
1238 . •. .....::: 3 5 3 2 3 71 . ... ..: is j5CT • ' i'. : ::: :
:fix ; :••:•:•:v:•••:•i i:•:•: ::::•:•:titi•::i:�:•�
•
_ i
7E 1
za
�- As
TqLx
1 ,
log r •
Ole
dop 00,
t••"� .+ ..... -� r
t i
1 (5)
2410
•
.,C a .0 S tc.
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
Attachment 2
v
a
Action by, Counoil.v
Endorsed,.,..
Modified_
MEMORANDUM Rejected
17ete
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Budget Change - Curbside Recycling
DATE: January 12, 1989
Request
Authorization for a budget change to finance the curbside recycling
program for 1989.
Recommendation
Increase the estimated revenues by $78,176 to equal the Ramsey County
grant money to be received from 1989.
Increase expenditure account 101- 704 -4330 by $78,176.
Action by Council:
Endorsed-_-
MEMORANDUM od fie
d
To, rlichael X* McGuire, City Manager
From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & ate
Sub*: Change Orders for Park improvements - 88 -2P
Date: January 11, . 19 8 9
In t roduc t ion
It is requested that the City Council approve Change Orders 1
through 4 for Park Improvement Projects 88-2P and provide funding.
g
from, appropriate accounts.
Background
Change Order 1
Excavate unsuitable material from Geranium parking- lot and
bring in suitable sand from Playcrest Park to be placed. in
Geranium parking lot, and under tennis courts and basketball
court. $7 , 250.20
Change Order 2
Excavation of unsuitable material from art of Hazelwood
p park-
ing lot and replacement with suitable sand from Hazelwood.
$3,136.00
Change Order 3
Adjustments. to parking entrance and lot at Playcrest Park.
$411.48
Change Order 4
Haul topsoil from Hazelwood Park to Sherwood Park,
$3 , 828.50
Budget
Suf f,ic Tent funds .are available through Tax Increment Financing
Funds that have been allocated to these projects and through
Neighborhood PAC Funds.
Recommendation
it is requested that the City Council approve and
pp direct �. ect the
Mayor and Clerk to be authorized to modify the existing con -
tract with Enebak Construction Company by executing Change
Orders 1 throuth 4 for Maplewood. Park Improvement Projects 88 -2P
and approve funding as follows:
Change Order 1 - - Geranium - Neighborhood PAC Fund
Change Order 2 - Hazelwood - Hazelwood TIF Fund
Change Order 3 - Playcrest- Playcrest TIF Fund
Change Order 4 - Sherwood - Sherwood TIF Fund
Attachments: (4 )
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 (No proceed order necessary)
Prod ect . P
• Park Improvements '889 Maplewood, MN Change Order By: Stephen Malloy
Client. Y P • City of Ma lewood, MN Date: November 9, 1988
Contractor.
ENEBAK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Contract Dated :August 26, 1988
WEHRMAN BERGLY LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATES, INC. . ARCH ITECTS- PLANtJERS
North P1 aza . Bu i 1 d i ng , Suite 220
5217 Wayzata Boulevard, St. Louis Park, PAIN 55416 Phone 612/544 -7576
Gentlemen:-
The following change is ordered in accordance with Section 111 of the General
Conditions:
1. Borrow specified sand from Playcrest Park for placement at
Geranium Park s-o as to provide 1,5.80 C.Y. of granular material
in place under the tennis and basketball courts at $3.20 /C.Y. $5,056.00
2. Excavate 477 C.Y. of unsuitable material from the proposed parking 667.80
area at Geranium Park for placement on site @ $1.40 /C.Y.
3. Borrow specified sand from Playcrest Park for placement at Geranium
Park so as to provide 477 C.Y. of granular material in place
under the parking area @ $3.20 /C.Y. 1,526.40
4. Refer to attached drawing of Geranium Park tennis and basketball
court revisions.
Subject to conditions hereinafter set forth, an equitable adjustment of .the contract
.price and the contract time-is established as follows:
The Contract Price is (increased) VWWd
Seven thousand two hundred fifty
and 20 /100 dollars ($7,250.20
and the Contract Time is unchanged
The conditions last above referred to are as follows:
A. The aforementioned g ned chan a and work affected thereby, are subject to all contract
stipulations and covenants;
The rights of the Owner are not prejudiced; and
B. Th g • re incidental to , or as a
C. The claims against the Owner , which we
consequence of, the aforementioned change, are satisfied.
/000
/5'ignature of Issue
(Accepted)_
Owner)
Z
Title
r'xf PA t
CHANGE ORDER PLO. 2 (No proceed order necessary)
Project: : Park Improvements '88, Maplewood, 1 ewood, MN Change Order By: Stephen Malloy
City of Maplewood, ewood Date: November 14, 1988 , MN
Client. • y P �
Contractor. Contract Dated:
• Enebak Construction Company August 26, 1988
WEHRMAN BERGLY ASSOCIATES, INC.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS- PLAN14ERS
North Plaza Buildings Suite 220
Lou's Park MN 55416 Phone 612/544 -7576
5217 Wa zata Boulevard, St. s
Gentlemen: .
The following change is ordered in accordance with Section 111 of the General
Conditions:
1 120 C.Y. of unsuitable material from the proposed
1. Excavate
parking area at Hazelwood Park for placement on site @ $1.40 /C.Y. $1,568.00
2. Borrow sand from Hazelwood Park for placement on site so as to
. rovi de 1,120 C.Y. of granular material in place under the
P $19568-00
proposed parking area @ $1.40 /C.Y.
Subject to conditions hereinafter set forth, an equitable adjustment of the contract
.price and the contract time is established as follows:
The Contract Price is (increased) Three thousand one hundred thirty -six
and 00 /100 dollars ($3,136.00 )
and the Contract Time is unchanged .
The conditions last above referred to are as follows:
A. The a�
r orementioned change, n e , and work affected thereby, are subject to all contract
stipulations and covenants;
B The rights of the Owner are not prejudiced; and
against the wner which were incidental to, or as a
C. The clams aga satisfied.
consequence of, the aforementioned change , are s
Signature of Issue
(Accepted)
Owner
By
Title
Date
�- CHANGE ORDER W0. 3 (loo proceed order necessary)
Project: Park Improvements'889 Maplewood MN Change Order By: Stephen Malloy
Client: City of Maplewood, MN Date: November 14, 1988
Contractor: Enebak Construction Company - Contract Dated: August 26, 1988
8. Refer to attached drawing of P1 aycrest Park parking area revisions.
Subject to conditions hereinafter set forth, an equitable adjustment of the contract
price and the contract time-is established as follows:
The Contract Price is (incre Four hundred eleven
and 48 /100 dollars ($411.48
and the Contract Time is unchanged .
The conditions last above referred to are as follows:
A. The aforementioned change, and work affected thereby, are subject to all contract
stipulations and covenants;
B. The rights of the Owner are not prejud-i ced; and
C. The claims against the uwner which were incidental to, or as a
consequence of, the aforementioned change , . are satisfied.
SigrAture of Issuer
(Accepted)
(Owner)
By
Ti t e
Date
WEHRMAN BERGLY ASSOCIATES, INC.
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS
North Plaza Building, Suite 220
5217 Wayzata Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Phone 612/544 -7576
Gentlemen:
The following change e i s ordered
in accordance with Section 111
of the General
Conditions:
1. Delete 6 L.F. of proposed
B612 curb and gutter @ $10.00/L.F.
-$ 60.00
2. Remove 6 L.F. of existing
B618 curb and gutter @ $10.00 /L.F.
60.00
3. Remove 24 S.F. of existing
sidewalk @ $1.00 /S.F.
24.00
4. Add 22.7 S.Y. of 2" -thick
bituminous @ $3.00 /S.Y.
68.10
5, Add 7.7 S.Y. of 6" -thick concrete
apron @ $25.00 /S.Y.
192.50
6. Add 30.4 S.Y. of 6" -thick
rock base @ $2.20 /S.Y.
66.88
7. Add 6 L.F. of B618 curb and
gutter @ $10.00 /L.F.
60.00
8. Refer to attached drawing of P1 aycrest Park parking area revisions.
Subject to conditions hereinafter set forth, an equitable adjustment of the contract
price and the contract time-is established as follows:
The Contract Price is (incre Four hundred eleven
and 48 /100 dollars ($411.48
and the Contract Time is unchanged .
The conditions last above referred to are as follows:
A. The aforementioned change, and work affected thereby, are subject to all contract
stipulations and covenants;
B. The rights of the Owner are not prejud-i ced; and
C. The claims against the uwner which were incidental to, or as a
consequence of, the aforementioned change , . are satisfied.
SigrAture of Issuer
(Accepted)
(Owner)
By
Ti t e
Date
CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 (No proceed order necessary)
• a e ood MN Change Order By: Stephen Malloy
Project: . Park Improvements 88, M pl q
Date: December 8', 1988
Client : Cit y of Ma lewood, MN
ontract Dated: August 26, 1988
Contractor: Enebak Construction Company 9
WEHRMAN BERGLY ASSOCIATES, INC*
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS.
North Plaza Building, Suite 220
5217 Wayzata Boulevard, St. Louis Park PAIN 55416 Phone 612/544 -7576
Gentlemen:
Section X11 of the General
The following change is
ordered n accordance with Sect o
Conditions:
Haul*1 235 C.Y. of designated topsoil from Hazelwood Park in
Maplewood to Sherwood Park in Maplewood @ $3 . .10 /C.Y. $3,828.50
P
Subject to conditions hereinafter set forth, an equitable adjustment of the contract
price and the contract time-is established as follows:
.���
The Contract Pace is (increased) ¢C ) Three thousand eight hundred
-ei ht and 50 /100 dollars ($39828.50 twenty g _
and the Contract Time is--
s unchanged
The conditions last above referred to are, as follows:
A. The aforementioned change,, and work affected thereby, are subject to all contract
stipulations and coven nts; �wner udiced� and
B. The rights of the are not prey
g • Owner ,which were incidental to , or as a
C. The clams against the
consequence
of, the aforementioned change, are satisfied.
Signature of Is )Ile r
(Accepted)
Owner
By
Title
Date
By
Title
Date
�s7 Cc�
Aotioftby Council:
Endorsed
Modified
MEMORANDUM RejeoteA_
Date*
To: Michael A. McGuire, -City Manager
.From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Pariks &.Recreatio
Subj: Replacement of Park Maintenance Person
Date: January 12, 1989
Introduction
Mr. David- Germain,, Park Maintenance Person II,, has requested
transfer to the Public Works Utility Department, In keeping
with Union contracts and transfer procedures, the transfer
will be effective January 12, 1989.
Discussion
It is important that we replace this position as quickly as
.possible, as we have a great deal of outdoor worl-C. that mu:;t
be accomplished this Winter and it is important that we enter
the Spring season with a full crew,
Budget
There will be a reduction in Wages/Full-Time EmployQes from a
Park. Maintenance II position to a Par]-,.-. Maintenance I position.
Recommendation
It is requested that the City Council authorize the hiring of
a Park Maintenance Person I for the Parks and Recreation De-
partment,
c: City Clerk
MAPLEWOOD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
January 10, 1989
To: Gail Blackstone
Staff Services Coordinator
City of Maplewood
From: Pat Williamson �j
Chairperson, HRC
Following action taken at our regular meeting on January 3, I am
w r i t i ng on behalf of the Commission to recommend reappointment
of the following commissioners:
Sister Claire Lynch
Scott Rostron
Patricia A. Williamson
007 s;
w
nd.ors a d,r,,-
otl.ified..- �..�.��.
]Rej eoteCi,.,.,,
If appointed, each person has agreed to serve another term, Please
let me know if any additional information is needed., T. can be reached
at 625-4044, Thanks,
AGENDA REPORT
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Col l i ns��/C-...'
Subject: Purchase of Police Vehicles
Date: January 5, 1989
Introduction
F-- ?
Action b.; Council.,
Endorsed..........
Mod.ifie
Rejected,.
Date
.The City Council approved $54,000 for the purchase of four marked patrol
vehicles and $30,000 for two paramedic patrol vehicles.
Background
The Maplewood Police Department entered into joint bidding with. the City
of St. Paul and Ramsey County and reviewed the state bids for the purchase
of these vehicles. Chevrolet was the lowest bidder at $12,687 per vehicle,
and that bid was accepted.
The bid price is only good for a short period of time, and these 'veh i c 1 es
with special equipment are only produced on one occasion during the year.
The Police Department will be in need of these vehicles before the next
bidding year, and it is imperative that we place our order while the
opportunity is available.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the purchase of four marked patrol vehicles and two
paramedic patrol vehicles be approved.
Budget Impact
Monies have already been approved for the purchase of these vehicles.
Action Required
For submission to the City Council for their approval.
KVC: j s
cc Captain Nelson
Vehicle File
Paramedic File
� -9
January 13, 1989
Aotion b�y Counoll..
MEMORANDUM Endorsed..
l(odi f i ed .,,,,.,.,,,.r;,,,,,r,
To: City Manager Michael McGuire eJ eot+ed_,, ,,. ,.„
Dtt
From: Chief of Police Kenneth U. Collins -;� fL,
Subject: Donation
In lieu of taxes, Trinity Baptist Church generally donates $400 to the
City of Maplewood.
I would recommend that the City accept this gift. I have sent a letter
of thanks to the church.
KVC: j s
cc Gift File
VENDUR:
1G7 � 4
OUR REF. NO. `YOUR INVOICE NO. INVOICE DATE INVOICE AMOUNT AMOUNT PAID DISCOUNT TAKEN NET CHECK AMOUNT
12/31/88 #249 $400900 Thanks for our service y ervice in 1988 .
PAY
Tom
OF
TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH
2220 EDGERTON
ST. PAUL, MN 55117
FOUR HUNDRED and no /100 DOLLARS
MIAPLEWOOD FIRE AND POLICE
THE ROSEVILLE BANK 12574
ROSEVILIE, MN 58113
CHECK NO. CHECK DATE VENDOR N0.
12/31/88
CHECK AMOUNT
r
II.0 L 2 5 ?4II' 1:0960 L6 ?651: 24el, 36668II'0 L
$400.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY- OFFICE OF CHIEF OF POLICE 612-770-4530
January 13, 1989
Pastor Wade D. Mi ke l s
Trinity Baptist Church
2220 Edgerton
Maplewood, MN 55117
Dear Pastor Mikels:
On behalf of the Maplewood ewood Po 1 '
P ice and Fire Departments, I want to thank ou
for your generous donation of $400, y
We appreciate the church's support of our departments.
Very truly yours,
i
Kenneth V. Collins, Chief of Police
Maplewood Police Department
KVC:js
cc City Manager
Gift File
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
L. AT I ON a
APPL.I CANT /OWNER:
PROJEC-r:
DATER
INTRODUCTION
R u e s r *11"
MEMORANDUM
City Manager
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit Revision
2280 Maplewood Drive
Menard, Inc.
Menards
January 4, 1988
SUMMARY
Aotion by Courwil 0
19ndorsed-_ - . W.
Modified—_
R8jeoted-.
Date..-
Menard, Inc. is requesting that their conditional use permit
(CUP) be revised (see page 10) to permit them to increase the
height of their screening fence from ten to fourteen feet along
the south and east lot I in es as shown on the site pl an (page 9)
Reasons for the -Egguest
The stc-.)rage racks are too t a l I to meet the
of the conditional use permit . One of the
I imits the height of a fence to ten feet.
Code al so I imits the height of a f ence to
variation is approved by the City Council
BACKGROUND
screening reqLA 3. rement
CDR8 conditions
Section 9-3 a+ City
ten feet unl ess a.
On March 28, 1988, the City Council approved the CUP. (See
page 19.3 Condition One a+ the site plan approval required
that the fence be no taller than ten feet. Condition "rwo of
the LJP's "permitted property use" specifications stated
that "materials in the for yard shall be no more than
807. visible +ram the residential lots to the south. This
may limit stacking height" s.or require a higher +enc ell " This
condition was intended to require that materials be 80%
co.incealed (20% visible) which is the standard screening
requirement,
The for racks are being constructed at a height of 17
1/2 feet. Therefore, the racks and materials would be
visible 7 1/2 feet above the fence, not 2 1/2 feet (20%) as
intended by Council .
2n On December 2, 1988, staff met with representatives of
Menards, as well as with adjacent neighbors, Scott Hartman
and Craig Anderson, to discuss the s: torte age-rack height
problem and screening deficiency,, The outcome of that
meeting is I isted on page 14.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Revise the CUP to permit a fence height increase to 14
feet.
2" Require that Menards construct a ten-foot tall fence as
originally required and restrict their storage yard
materials to a maximum height of 12 1/2 feet.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Section 36-442 (b) requires that approval of a CUP be based on
the findings in the resolution. See page 160
RECOMMENDATION
A. Adoption of resolution on page 16 revising the conditional
use permit for 2280 Maplewood Drive, based on the findings
required by code. Condition Two shall be revised as follows
(additions are underlined and deletions crossed out):
2. Materials in the storage yard shall be no more than 8�*.
20% visible from the residential lots to the south.
B. Amend Condition One of the site plan approval to state
(additions are underlined and deletions crossed out) :
1. All fencing shall be continually and properly
maintained. Barb wire is prohibited. The fence along
the south and east borders of the parking lot shall be
decorative wood rather than metal. The fence shall be
ttr--to-ten fourteenL feet in height.
�4
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed the 37 Surrounding property owners within 350 feet
for their comments regarding this proposal. Of the 15 rep1ies,
two had no comment, ten were in favor, and three objected.
In Favor Comments
1,It will screen the storage area and block the Sound. I
hope.
2" I am in favor because of noise abatement--would prefer green
for less visibility thru trees.
3n It will be an effective screen of the storage area.
°~ 4, I am in favor, because the average height of a men is taller
~ these days, therefore he can jump that much higher.
5. The sound barrier will be appreciated.
6, As a real estate agent I feel a higher fence will keep
` property values from falling due to noise and unsightly
7. The fence will screen a large storage rack from our view and
will help abate noise.
Be, Ref er to the 1 etter on page I In
Staff Comment: The applicant has statedx
a. The storage rack heights are not proposed to increase
over that of the present one,
b. Deliveries and stocking of merchandise in the storage
yard will be conducted during business hours (8 a.m. to
9 p.m. Monday to Friday, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturday, and
10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Sunday.) Occasionally, there might
be a delivery outside of these time periods.
The CUP limited the hours of operation in the storage yard
between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m.
Objections
I. I object because % fear it will obstruct air flow. Have
them build the originally agreed-upon fence.
2. I object because in the back of the building, I think they
should extend this fence to where the trucks turn in and
then back up to the loading docks. A store the size of
Menards and the turnover of Merchandise it does, will
require many trucks every day to replenish their stock so
3
therefore, I think a sound barrier isneeded where Ihave
indicated on the map where the fence/soundbarrier shOUldbe
extended. Also, what is the break in the fenc�e where
have indicated with an X? (See page 12.) Other than these
objections, a 14-foot screening fence is ok with me.
Staff comment: There is no break in the fence. The separation
in, line which represented the fence was due to light spot on the
(original map which didn't photo copy. The fence location has
already been approved by the City Council. The fence extension
requested is not a subject of this review.
3a Refer to the I etter on page 13,
Staff comment: The site plan -showed barbed wire since that was
the applicant's original proposal. Code, however, does not
permit barbed wire except in farm districts ;or livestock
fenting.
4
REFERENCE
l~ Acreage: 13.37 acres
211 Existing land use: Menards store (remodeling in progress)
Surroundin!B_Land Uses
Northerly: Highway 36
Southerly: Single 'dwellings
Easterly: Countryside Vol kswagen/Saab
Westerly: Highway 61
Past Action
3-28-88: The City Council granted the CUP and a parking space
authorization for fewer spaces.
7-26-88: The Community Design Review Board approved a change to
Menards' canopy design and color.
B~9-88: The Board approved site plan revisions for Menards to
relocate a driveway along the frontage road.
1. Land Use Plan designation: LSC
2, Zoning: M-1
3` Ordinance requirements:
Section 36-187 (a.3) will allow in an M-1 zone, any use
listed as a permitted use in a BC, business commercial
district, if the property is designated for LSC, limited
service commercial or RMv residential medium density use on
the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 36-187 (b) states that no building or exterior use,
except parking, may be erected, altered or conducted within
three hundred fifty (350) feet of a residential district
without a conditional use permit.
Section 36-442 (b) states that approval of am conditional use
permit shall be based upon the findings in the resolution on
page 14
is
Section 36-442 (g) states that in the evert the Council in
its review process decides to consider imposing additional
conditions or termination of a conditional use permit, the
City Council shall hold at least one public hearing on that
permit after a notice of the hearing has been published in
the official newspaper at least ten (10) days before said
9
hearing .The Cocncilshallalso cause a not ice tobe mailed
to each of the owners of property within three hundred fifty
feet of the boundary linesof the property; upon which such
use has been established, which notices are to be mailed to
the last known address of such owners at least ten (10)
days before the date of the hearing.
mb/menards2.mem
Attachments:
1, Land use plan
2. Zoning map
3. Site plan
4. Applicant's wr
5. Letter from Cr
6. Map from neigh
7. Letter from Ja
81 Letter to Mary
90 Resolution
10. 3-28-88 CUP
map
itten statement
aig Anderson
oor
mes Everson
Pruchaska
conditions of approval
�
r
1.0
0 0
o m o
o � �
o 0
,t E E E
e�►CtlenPe� 4
tp l B r -Si
• QTIn aI r er ai
.••j rplicsGi SC .Rte
f•J `
man= at �t K,� s s v
Rm.
Min w
u n R m M
CL
• _ S st w n
lot
trip
m
os
S i
mino art*riat
ago
_ _ --
p 4 <
W M
0
to
0
r
SHERWOOD GLEN
LAND USE PLAN
Attachment 1
Q
N
0000 �11Qo
Li a
v � �
1 I
1 �
s'
v�
e
' Ste
0
to too
t
I �
.—_., ! • '
�o
i •.•o.
�4'" '•: '•:}
.IS. 3 i
._ . 107
Gas Station,
Q 3 it_�
, t +sea,
v
1110 -
N Ir 4v
A _ � '
4- 20 o`
�/.6en�
LN
teo —
O
6-M
if ILL A0[ stet
2%.0
N
A
Lo5ec
a 21
a
20
• °�•�
�s�
S7.
Irr
031
2
uv
0201-
�_- __. _ 940t i_I •
= 1
4
N
lob
tA-'- IA M 'f
• I I
.
- 17'
---- r- -••+.. n.�.. -
0 1 •.
.Q
L1L1910 •.a,:
61. ..r...,.•�,..
VW —SAAB T.'�.*._ �_ � • _o•.•r'a>��t,
71
14
100
1)
Ito,
Z f O' 2>O'
1. 9,11 per 1 % S • I S4. .
1
NOR
40 I 40 11♦ - ii t ►
LC ?Ill !W 1:294 1
tea; 161 17i1el130 {: 1� si�••t;�l:el =+�
jk�
L L • - To - -� — ..,•L t or- IF
MP q- toot
C.
Is 14 11loI ,e�i` ., Si4 {4it
�� ' { ;� � �.r ,
2255 t
4 01.
kw=04 0 LARK •• •-
--' i� 2233 •,, 1is 14-'10 1.1; 114Ii 2�IFS•46b PM R�l
:• { 1 i
IJ
--)Dd �,%; •-
" 222T �, 1 I ,
fc) >� Isr►41 1) I , II , /Q + �I If I i I • 1 R I 4� j : 2
• J 1 14 to! no 1 4t ..•' •1 (.lo A 1 4(y! AD 14,01 .e.
y j lip
..
tat ♦ewc �>,►c 1 I1� i 1 I cl••u�c
r,? 4;v Ito w I 1 T
i I
is
(0-10 ,sl'••,1��'�r I II 1 wT�u'a�' �J.-� 1 5 e ;�� �''•
L'
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q
B Attachment 2 N
ib
. SITE PLAN
9 Attachment '3
i4
N
M�111dR1� cur
MAPLEWOOD MENARDS
REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN CONDITIONAL USE
TO ALLOW A 14 FOOT HIGH SCREENING FENCE AND SOUND BARRIER
Upon reconsideration of the screening and possible noise abatement
of the outside storage area, Menards would like to request a change
in our Conditional Use to allow an increase in fence height. We
would like to propose a 14' high screening fence /sound barrier in
lieu of the 10' high fence currently approved. The fence material
would be a textured plywood residential type siding (referred to
as T- 1 -11), stained brown or green.
Menards feels we can be a better neighbor if we can more effectively
screen the outside storage area and block the sound. This higher
fence, using a solid wood siding, will help to accomplish this.
It may even help to block some of the highway noise.
This proposal has previously been favorably discussed with two
of our neighbors: Scott Hartman and Craig Anderson. Please see
attached letter dated December 6, 1988, from Thomas Ekstrand.
10
Attachment 4
4777 MENARD DRIVE EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703 PHONE: (715) 874 -5911 TELEX: 260032 FAX #: 715- 874 -5901
��i /vG /b8
W--" A4
i�e�. Ala r a.�.� 7�u. , -�
/%P�t.eeY4a- �iU�t- aa,�un.2�
A 34..a 1,,e
17
aodt� w0000���� e0000t���� 0 pZ-Aw
1-i�ic, a z�C..iuc aka .
dop
mow-
UALOIc.1111111111111111!1111r/�
Z4:20� 400016
NUU,404 C
'000. J .(C0000 G�CGL��+^'t � GH pep
�
aooue GtuXIIA4t N
fooq
11 Attachment 5
i
V
jell
t
"N
Nona
be
• i
w
o t �
• �p Q� Z
1
•
0 lop •
,�
NIP
am
t'
t1 �'
A o. -� - -
t
iQms
ac=
•w•
.may
i
i
7�
toole
.f
. i
•�
O•
12
Attachment 6
12 2 '88
2227 Uni versi ty Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55114
(612) 646 -7901
December 22, 1988
Mr. Tom Ekstrand, Associates Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Mr, Ekstrand:
This letter is in response to your neighborhood survey
regarding d n the conditional use permit for Menard' s
screen fence*
opposed to the excessive height of the proposed
We are. opp ,
fence which would create a fortress appearance*
re also 0 osed ,to the barbed wire which i s shown
We are
on top
of the fence. We feel the barbed wi i
re s not
aesthetically pleasant and creates a prison -camp
atmosphere.
We are i
n f avor of a barrier but we feel a 14 foot high
fence with barbed wire is a little extreme.
Si ncere1y,
DAVID REALITY CO., INC.
James Everson
Representative
JE /ly
13 Attachment, 7
CITY OF
MAY it W
1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B NIAPLEINTOOD, VIII\ NESOTA 55149
t•
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612.4770-4"056 0
December 6, 1988
Mr. Mary Prochaska
MENDARD, INC.
4777 Menard Drive
Eau Claire, WI 54703
SCREENING PLAN REVISIONS -- MAPLEWOOD MENARDS
Below is a summary of the changes you agreed to with neighbors Scott Hartman and
Craig Anderson when Geoff Olson and I met with you on December 2. 1988 at Menards.
Menards agreed to:
19 Check to see if the top horizontal row of bracing is needed for the storage
rack - -if not needed, they shall be removed;
20 P aint the top two horizontal rows of the storage rack to match the vertical
rack supports;
3. increase the height of the screening fence to 14 -15 feet;
4, apply texture 1 -11 plywood siding to the south side of the fence;
1 ant six—foot—tall 1 ever reens spaced eight feet on center on top of the h i l l
5. p g
in the back yard of 1101 East County Road B (Esther Anderson's property);
6. P lant three to four twelve — foot —tall evergreens in the back yard of 1081 East County Road B (Scott Hartman , s property).
and Mr. Anderson agreed to water and care for these trees once they
Mr. Hartman a g
are planted.
14 Attachment 8
Mr. Mary Prochaska
Page 2
December 6, .1988
Based on our telephone conversation on December 6. 19889 I understand that you
will be making application for a conditional use permit revision to request that
the City Council allow a fence height increase to .14 feet for the screening
fence along the south lot line.
Please call me at 770 -4563 if you have any questions or comments concerning
this matter.
U
THOMAS EKSTRAND — ASSOCIATE PLANNER '
6
mb
cc: Mr. Craig Anderson
Mr. Scott Hartman
15
Pursuant to due cal and notice thereof a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Maplewoodv Minnesota was duly called and held
in the Council Chambers in said City on the day of
, 1989 at 7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, Menard, Inc, initiated a conditional use permit to
construct an outside storage yard within 350 feet of a residential
district at the following-described property:
Parcel 1: That certain triangular tract of land situated in the
Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, described as
follows, to-wit:
Commencing at a point on the East line of the Southwest Quarter of
said Section 9 at its intersection with the Easterly line of United
States Highway No. 61, as widened; thence South on the East line of
said Southwest Quarter to a point 100 feet North of the North line of
County Road B; thence West and paralle1 with the North line of said
County Road B to the Easterly line of United States Highway No. 61, as
widened; thence Northeasterly along the Easterly line of said United
States Highway No. 61, as widened, to the point of beginning.
Parcel 2: The South 107 f eet of that part of the North 5 acres of
the South 50 rods of the North 105 rods of the West 32 rods ofthe
Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, which lies
Southeasterly of the following-described line:
Commencing at a point on the South line of said 5-acre tract which
line is the South line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter, distant 60 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence
running Northeasterly to the Northeast corner of said tract and there
teerminating.
Parcel 3: All that part of the West 32 rods of the Southwest
Quarter of tKe Southeast Quarter of Section 91 Township 29, Range 22
lying North of County Road Bv except HeiVemann^s Belleview Addition to
Gladstone, and except highway~
Parcel 4: Block 16, lying South of State Trunk Highway No. 36,
except the East 240 feet thereof; and Block 15, except the East 240
feet thereof, and except part thereof taken for highway; and Block 10,
except the East 30 feet thereofv and except that part of the West 225
feet of the East 255 feet thereof lying South of the North 30 feet
16 Attachment 9
thereof, al in C1ifton Addition , Ramsey County, Minneeota.
This property is also known as 2280 Maplewood Drive, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is
as +ollows:
1. This conditional use permit was originally approved by the
Maplewood City Council on March 28, 1988.
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing. to consider
this revision on , 198 . Notice thereof was published
and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff
and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT
the above-described conditional use permit be on the
basis of the fol1owing Findings-of -fact: `
1. The use is in conformity with the City'.s comprehensive plan
and with the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated
to be compatible with the character of that zoning district,
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to
present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare,
smoke, dustv odor, fuees, water pollution, water run-off, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on
local streets and shall not create traffitc congestion, unsafe access or
parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties.
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such
as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.
Be The use would not create excessive additional requirements at
public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be
detrimental to the welfare of the city.
90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design"
10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
17
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1 Adherence to the site plan, dated March 15, 1988, unless a
change is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board.
2. Materials in the storage yard shall be no more than 20%
visible from the residential lots to the south.
3. Hours of operation in the storagae yard shall be Yimited to B
a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday to Friday, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturday and 10 a.m.
to. 5 p.m. Sunday.
Adopted this day of , 1989.
Seconded by Ayes----
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF RAMGEY ) GG.
)
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
%v the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of
, 1989, with the original on file in my office, and the
same is a full, true and complete transcript insofar as the same
relates to a conditional use permit.
Witness my hand as such Clsrk and the corporate seal of the City
this day of , 19898
City Clerk
City of Map I ewood
ffelol
19
Attachment 10
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and
operated to be compatible with the character of that
zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing
to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the
noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution,
water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness,electrical
interference or other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on
local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, un-
safe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden
to the area properties.
7.. The use would be serviced by essential public services,
such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools
and parks.
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at
public cost for public facilities and services; and would not
be detrimental to the welfare of the City.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Appxoyal is subject to the following conditions:
1. Adherence to the site plan, dated March 15, 1988, unless a
change is approved by the City's Community Design Review
Board.
2. Materials in the storage yard shall be no more than 80%
visible from the residential lots to the south. This may
limit stacking heights or require a higher fence height.
3. Hours of operation in the storage yard shall be limited to
7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
10. Councilmember Anderson moved to allow 395 parking spaces.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all.
11. Councilmember Anderson moved_ to approve the building and site plans,,
subject to the f ollowinp conditions being met before an occupancy permit
1. All fencing shall be continually and properly maintained.
Barb wire is prohibited. The fence along the south and east
borders of the parking lot shall be decorative wood rather
than metal. The fence shall be up to ten feet in height.
- 6 - 3/28
20
2. Any change in sign location or area must be approved by the
City.
3. All drives shall be 30 feet in width.
4. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclo-
sures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall be a color
and material compatible with the building. Enclosures shall
be protected by concrete - filled steel posts, or the equiva-
lent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the
structure. Jf the enclosure is masonry, the protective posts
may be omitted.
5. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be submitted for
the City Engineer's approval.
6. A new sanitary sewer and service connections shall be con-
structed from the building to the Metro interceptor.
Easements shall be provided. The City shall reimburse
Menard's for the cost.
7. Dedication of a utility easement from the existing sanitary
sewer main at the southwest corner of the site to the MWCC
interceptor.
8. All requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be met relative to
the automatic fire suppression systems and alarms.
9. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed
or shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent
properties or roadways.
10. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed
due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored
and irons replaced by the applicant.
11. The outside incinerator on the south side of the building shall
be removed.
12. Since the developer proposes future development on the outlot,
any.future development shall comply with the requirements of
the Sh- :reland Ordinance,
13. Restrij:- the parking lot to conform with the striping plan.
14. The City Engineer may require concrete curb and gutter where
needed to channel water away from residential proeprty or the
frontage road. A storm sewer shall be constructed from the
southeast corner of the site to the southwest corner of the
site. The City Engineer may require surface drainage as an
alternative if the storm sewer cannot be constructed because
of William Brothers Pipeline.
- 7 - 3/28
4 K:3
15. Install a fire hydrant in front of the building and another
hydrant west of the storage yard, consistent with St. Paul
Water Department standards.
16. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee in a form
acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated
cost of any site improvements that are not completed by oc-
cupancy,
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. -
Ayes all.
Y
12. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
88 -3 -42
WHEREAS, it is proposed to construct trunk storm sewers and
stormwater ponds to drain the area roughly bounded by U.S. Highway
61, State Trunk Highway 36, English Street and Burke Avenue (ex-
tended) and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion
of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statuteq
Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer
for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all
convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to
whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it
should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other
improvement, and the estimb►ated cost of the improvement as recom-
mended.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all.
21
AGENDA REPORT
Endorsed....,,,
To: Mayor and City Co nc i- 1 Modified
Rejetet�._.,,
FROM: City Manager Rate
RE: 1989.PAY RATES FOR TEMPORARY AND PART -TIME EMPLOYEES
DATE: January 17, 1989
This topic was discussed in detail at the January 9, 1989 Council Meeting and
some question remains as to the disposition of it.
I therefore request that the attached resolution be adopted as submitted.
MAM:Inb
AGENDA NO.
A G E N D A R E P O R T
TO: City Manager
FROM: Staff Services Coordinator
RE: 1989 Pay Rates.for Temporary and Part -Time Employees (Non- Union)
DATE: January 3, 1989
PROPOSAL
It is proposed that the attached resolution'be adopted to provide for the 1989
revis ion of the pay rates for non -union temporary and part -time employees. The
objective is to have the pay rates for all temporary and part -time employees o y ees set
p
at one time in one resolution.
BACKGROUND
Past policy has set the minimum pay rate for each position to be the amount
specified under minimum wage law. It is proposed that this policy be continued.
The current minimum wage rates. are $3.85 per hour for. those age 18 and of der and
$ per hour for those under age 18.
It is proposed that the maximum pay rates for each position be increased by 4%
and a minimum of $.25 per hour effective January 1, 1989 with the following
exceptions. For the Secretary, Accounting Clerk and Clerk- Typist positions, the
maximum is equivalent , to the , starting pay rate for a full-time permanent
employee. For the Administrative Assistant position, the maximum pay rate is
increased from $7.60 to $10.50 per hour to facilitate hiring for certain
specialized 'or professional positions such as interns, election judge
coordinator, etc. It should also be noted that the last time these pay rates
were increased was two years ago.
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of the attached resolution is recommended.
GJB:Inb
R`ES0LUTL0N
WHEREAS', according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations Ae
t,
part -time employees who do not work more than 14 hours per week and temporary
employees who do not work in excess of 67 days in a calendar year are not covered
by union contract wage rates.
NOW.,�THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay rate maximums are
hereby established for temporary and part -time employees retroactive to J anuar
11 1989. y
Recreation worker $11.28 per hour
Recreation official 16.95 per ame
g
Puppeteers 28.24 per show
Accountant 14.20 per hour
Administrative assistant 10.54 per hour
Secretary, 9.77 per hour
Accounting clerk 10.10 per hour
Clerk- Typist 8.87 p er hour
Election judge -5.50 per hour
Election precinct chairman 5.75 per hour
Laborer 6.00 per hour
Engineering aide. .6.60 p er.hour
Janitor 4.95 per.hour
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the minimum pay rates for each of the above
be (1) the amount specified by Federal law for chose positions covered and (2)
$2.50.per hour for those positions not covered by Federal or State law.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager shall have the authority to
set the pad rate within the above ranges.
Agenda Number
AGENDA REPORT
Ott= -by Counofl -pi
XndorseA
Modified
R%j q0teA
Data-
TO: Mayor and City Council
40A
FROM: City Manager
RE: RULES OF PROCEDURE
DATE: January 17, 1989
This item was tabled at the January 9th Council meeting. Attached
are the recommended changes to the amendments of the.Rules of
Procedure which Gary Bastian submitted. Please review these
changes so we can discuss them at the next meeting.
GWB:kaz
Attachment
Section 1.
"Place: All meetings shall be held in the Council Chambers of the
Maplewood City Hall unless there is a published notice designating
another location.
Curfew: Delete "the" after "continued to" and insert "after the "; and
delete "4:30" and insert "5:30 ".
Section 2.
(First paragraph on page 9)
After the last line insert: "If not presented within the specified time
limit the matter under consideration shall be tabled until the next regular
council meeting."
Section 3.
(Divide paragraph into two separate paragraphs)
"(a) The Council shall . . . cooperative sessions."
"(b) All Council meetings and actions taken there at, shall conform to
the requirements of the open meeting law."
Section 4.
After "subsequent meeting" insert ", but shall be noted in the official
minutes of the meeting so amended in bold print"
Add a new (d) to read:
"(d) Tape or video recordings of council meetings shall be preserved
N
only for the purpose of preparing the official minutes of the
Council meeting."
Section 6.
Amend (e) to read:
"(e) A Councilmember has the privilege of having an abstract of his /her
statement on any subject under consideration by the Council, or
the reason for his /her dissent from or support of any action of
the Council, entered in the minutes. The provision in Section
4(c) shall not apply to this paragraph."
Section 9.
Delete the last six words of the paragraph.
Section 10.
Amend (b) by deleting "this resolution" and inserting "these rules"
RULES OF PROCEDURE
Section 1.
MEETIINGS
Regular: The City Council shall hold regular meetings on the second and
fourth Mondays of each month at 7:00 P.M., provided that when the
day fixed for any regular meeting falls on a day designated by law
as a legal holiday, such meeting shall be held at the same hour on
the next succeeding Thursday not a holiday.
ZLLC al: The Mayor or any two members of the Council by writing filed with
the City Clerk at least twenty -four hours before such meeting mac
call a special meeting. Notice of such meeting shall state the
purpose or purposes thereof and shall be personally delivered to
each member or be left at the members usual place of residence
with a person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein,
or written notice thereof shall be left in a conspicuous place at
the residence if no such person can be found there. The notice
shall be delivered twelve hours before the meeting time. Except
for trivial matters, business transacted at a special meeting shall
be limited to that mentioned in the call. Emergency meetings may be
called at any time providing all members of the Council sign waivers
of notice to such meeting and said waivers shall be filed with the
City Clerk.
Place: A11 meetings shall be held in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood
Municipal Building unless there is a published notice designating
another location.
Presiding Officers: The Mayor shall preside at all meetings of the Council.
In the absence of the Mayor, the Acting Mayor shall preside. In the
absence of both, the Councilmembers shall elect one of their number
as temporary chairman.
Quorum: Three members of the Council shall constitute a quorum at any meeting
of the Council, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time.
- 7 -
1/25
n
Order of Business: At the hour appointed for meeting, the members shall be
called to order by the Mayor, or in his absence by the Acting Mayor,
or in the absence of both, by the Clerk. the Clerk shall call the
roll, note the absentees and announce whether a quorum is present.
In the absence of the Clerk, the Mayor shall appoint a secretary
protem. Upon the appearance of the quorum, the Council shall pro-
ceed to business which shall be conducted in the following order:
A. Call to order
B. Roll Call
C. Approval of Minutes
D. Approval of Agenda
E. Consent Agenda
F. Public Hearings
G. Award of Bids
H. Unfinished Business
I. New Business_
J. Visitor Presentations
K. Council Presentations
L. Administrative Presentations
M. Adjournment
Curfew: No additional agenda item will be discussed after 10:30 P.M.
Meetings adjourned under this policy will be continued to the
next Thursdays pre- agenda meeting at 4:30 P.M. The continued
meeting will start at the point on the agenda where the adjourn-
ment occurred. No new items will be added to the continued
meeting agenda.
First Regular: At the first regular Council meeting in January of each year,
the Council shall (1) designate the official newspaper, (2) choose
an Acting Mayor on a rotating basis from the membership of the
Council who shall perform the duties of the Mayor during the disa-
bility or absence of the Mayor, and (3) review the Rules of Pro-
cedure of the City Council and make any necessary changes if such
changes are desired.
Section 2.
AGENDA FOR REGULAR MEETING
(1) All matters to be submitted to the Council shall be filed not later than
12:00 Noon on the Monday prior to the Monday Council meeting at which con-
sideration is desired, and shall be delivered to the City Manager, or in
his absence, the City Clerk. In unusual circumstances and when the matter
does not require investigation, an item may be accepted after the deadline
upon the approval of the City Manager.
(2) Except for trivial matters, no item or business shall be considered for
action by the Council which does not appear on the agenda for the meet-
ing, except that an item or urgent business which requires immediate action
and is so determined by a majority of the Council may be considered by the
Council whether or not there is a full membership present. The Council
will hear all reasonable citizen petitions, requests and statements how-
ever, such items which do not specifically appear on the agenda shall be
deferred to a future meeting for more careful consideration and study if
Council action other than filing, is required or requested.
- 8 - 1/25
The Mayor and each Councilmember shall be provided with a Copy of the
agenda, minutes of the previous meeting, and any other reports and in-
formation pertinent to the agenda at least seventy -two hours prior to
each regular Council meeting-
No matter may be submitted for Council action by any administrative
official, department head, Or employee unless it has first been pre-
sented to the City Manager
Sect 3.
LIMITATION ON COUNCIL ACTION
The Council shall only take actiontatsecgionrl, unless1a11
special meet: sent meT-
s s, called pursuant
bars are present at the time the action is taken. Regular meetings.' c
en meeting
not include meetings with public bodies in joint or cooperative sessions.
�i All Council actions shall conform to the requirements of the op
law.
Sect 14•
M1K:'TES
(a) The City Clerk shall keep a record of all Council meetings.
nutes of a Council e
(b) Unless a reading of the mi be approvedr-withoutL
by a member of the Council, minutes a
beenprovided a COPY-
reading if each member has previously
(c) The Council may, by motion carried by a majoritote.tamend the
es
minutes. Such amending motion shall becore a p art
of the subsequent meeting.
Section 5.
DITTIES OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER:
The presiding officer shall preserve strict order and decorum at 811
meetings of the Council. He shall state ever question
the Council, announce the decision of the Coun,tto enall sublto s, and
and
decide all questions or order subject,
Council in which event s majority vote of the Council shall govern
conclusively determine such questions or order. He shall vote on all
questions and on a roll call vote rotate the order in which votes are
cast.
Sect -_ iion 5.
RULES OF DEBATE:
The Mayor or other presiding Officer may move, second and debate
(a)
from the their, subject only to such limitations of debate as are y
- 9 - 1/25
U
t9
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
the rules imposed on all members and shall not be deprived of any
of the rights and privileges of a Councilmember by reason of his
acting as the Presiding Officer.
Every member desiring to speak shall address the chairs and upon
recognition by the Presiding Officer shall confine himself to the
question under debate avoiding all personalities and indecorous
language.
A member, once recognized, shall not be interrupted when speaking
unless it be to call him to order or to vote on s motion to close
a debate, or as herein otherwise provided. If a Member. while
the
speaking, be called to order, he shall cease speaking Until
question of order is determined and if in order, he shall be per-
mitted to proceed.
A motion to reconsider any action taken by the Council must be made
at the meeting at which such action was taken or at the next regular
meeting of the Council and must be made by d ember of the Council
who voted with the prevailing side, provid
reconsider is possed,then the parties entitled to notice on the
original action shall be notified, anthemrecinsideratiing passage
action shall be taken at the next regular
of the motion to reconsider.
A Councilmember may request,through the Presiding Officer, the
privilege of having an abstract of his statement on any subject
under consideration by the Council, or the lreason for
inhis dessent
from or support of any
minutes.
The Clerk shall enter in th inures 8 synopsithef the discussion
on any question coming in proper
(f)
Section 7.
ADDRESSIrG THE COURCIL:
the Council shall first secure the per-
Any person desiring to address
mission of the Presiding Officer.
Each person addressing the Council shall give his name and address in an
audible tone for the records, and unless further time is granted
presiding Officer, shall limit his address to five minutes, except at e
and not to any member. No person
public hearing when the limit shell be ten minutes. All remarks should
be addressed to the Council as s body permitted
other than the'Council and the per con having the
or throughsaamember f the
to enter into any discussion, either directly g
Council, without the permission of the Presiding Officer. No Q uestion
shall be asked CouncilmingeOf r any member of the Administrative Staff
except
- 10 -
1/25
E
Section B.
GENERAL RULES OF ORDER:
Robert's Rules of Order and RobtParliamentary saw shall be accepted
as an authorit y on parliamentary practice
covered and in case of a conflict these rules shall govern.
Section 9.
DECORUM AND ITS ENFORCEMENT:
7be Council members, while the Council is in session, must preserve
order and decorum, end a member shal neither,
ither,bytconversationtor Council,
otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings o
-or is =tu -b any member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the
Council or its Presiding Officer, except as otherwise herein provided. To
smoking shall be permitted in the Council Chamber while the Council is in
session.
Section 10.
ORDINANCES RESOLUTIONSt MOTIONS AND REPORTS:
(e) Ordinances, resolutions, and other matters or subjects requiring
action by the Council shall be introduced and sponsored by a mem-
bet of he Council
presentt ordinances, eresolutions tand other'amatters rort a
subjects to
the Council.
(b) Every ordinance and resolution shall5ented in writinthend
read in full at a Council meeting; p rovided
reading of an ordinance or resolution may be dispensed with by
unanimous consent. Upon the vote on ordinances, resolutions and
motions, the ayes and nays shall be recorded. The vote ushall Dbe
by roll call of all members of the Council as provided
OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER in this resolution. A majority vote of
811 - re-b ^rs of the Council shall be required for the passage of
all ordinances, motions and resolutions except as otherwise pro-
vided by law and except that amendments to the comprehensive plan
shall requre at least four votes in favor.
(c) Every ordinance other than emergency ordinances shall have two
public readings as provided in Subsection (b) of the Section, and
at leat waiversthereof eand dthe second ereading eore reading or
waiver thereof.
(d) An emergency ordinance is an ordinance necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health. morals, safety assed byla
fare in which the emergency is defined and declared, p
roll cell vote of at least four members of the Council. as recorded
by eyes and nays. No prosecution shall be based upon the provisions
of any emergency ordinance until the same has been filed with the
- 11 - 1/25
City Clerk and posted in three conspicuous places in the City and
twenty -four hours after such filing and posting shall have elapsed
or until the ordinance has been published, unless the person, per-
charged with violations thereof shall
sons, firms or corporations
have had notice of the passage thereof prior to the act or omission
complained of.
Section 11.
CONDUCT OF CITY DiPLOYEES:
(e) The City Manager may take part in the discussions of the City
may
Council and may recommend to the Council such
andmeasures
efficienthe minis -
deem necessary for the welfare of the people
tration of the affairs of the City. He shall have all the rithereof;
powers and duties prescribed by
howev'Er, it is recognized that the Citv Council is the policy making
body for the City and the City Manager &''all confine his discussion
at Council meetings to statements of fa-,
on his knowledge and experience and explana_._•.s of the reasons
for the same, and any matters pertaining to administration.
(b) entertintop discussions rofh the tCity 1Coun'cilgexcept Atoo answer sques-
tions directed to such employee, or to present factual information.
(c) The above regulations of City employees shall not be construed
to ee
to limit the appearance before the City Council of any City
ploy
when such appearance is wade as s taxpayer di cussi of the public
for or against some particular issue under discussion by
when such employee has an interest in the outcome thereof.
Section 12•
WAIVER:
By 4/5 consent of all Councilmembers, these rules may be waived.
Sect 13•
,ADJOURNMENT:
djourn shall always be in order and decided without debate.
A motion to a
Seconded by
Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
- 12 - 1/25
Recycling Update, Mike Heinz
Mr. Heinz will update the Council on recycling at the meeting,
w /
Action by Council
Endorseci...-
Modif Jed-
ONO"
Rej eated....
Date
Agenda Number -�
Action by Counci:,;,
AGENDA REPORT Endorse
Modified,.
Reii e.eted......
..Da.t e
TO:. City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR COUNCIL
DATE January 13, 1989
Attached is information received from the League of Minnesota
Cities regarding insurance coverage for injuries to-elected
officials. The Council has been covered by workers' compensation
since 1973. For 1989, the cost for workers' compensation will be
.$530. A less expensive option would be coverage by an accident
i nsurance, pol i cy at' a cost of $63.75 per year.
Additional information regarding these options is attached. It is
requested that the Council decide if they want the accident
insurance policy instead of workers. compensation insurance.
DFF:kaz
Attachments
December 2 9 , ._ 19 8 8
183 University Ave. East
St, Paul, MN 55101 - 2526
(612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221 -0986)
To: City officials and agents
From : IMCIT
Re Coverage for injuries to elected officials
The workers compensation statutes provide' benefits to an
employee who is inured while working. M. S. 176.011, subd. 9,
(5� provides that an elected official is considered to be an
femployeef for workers compensation purposes only if the city
has passed an ordinance or resolution to that effect. An
elected official injured while performing .his or -her duties
would not be eligible for workers compensation benefits unless
the city had passed that ordinance or resolution
If the city wishes to provide workers compensation coverage age for
elected officials, it is preferable. to use an, ordinance rather
thana resolution. Resolutions are often recorded only in
'the
the
council minutes; years later it can be very difficult and
time - consuming to track down a resolution* We ve seen a number
of cases where a city has been paying premiums for workers
compensation coverage for elected officials for ears but
y , now
can't find any ordinance or resolution specifying that elected
officials are covered. An ordinance will ever
g ally be easier to
keep track, of permanently, since it is also recorded in the
city's ordinance book as well as in the council. minutes. The
following wording can be used for this ordinance: "'
Pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 176.011, subdivision 9, ' clause 5 the
elected officials of the city and those municipal officers
appointed.for a regular term of office are hereby. included in
the coverage of the Minnesota Workers Compensation Act
.If the city does not wish to cover its elected officials for
workers compensation, it might be wise to pass on ordinance to
that effect as well unless you are absolutely certain that the
city has never passed a resolution to
provide .coverage. That
resolution could have been passed as long ago as 1967 when the
law was first amended to permit cities too t
p for coverage.
In the past, the cost of workers compensation a covers has
discouraged n cities from g
g y rom covering their elected officials.
LMCIT has. now .taken a couple of steps to address this issue as
outlined on the following a es. The LMCIT I? g Board would also
like to hear from city officials as to whether they would favor
amending the statutes to make workers e
automatic for all elected compensation coverage
g
cted officials.
- Disability benefits would continue for a maximum of 26
weeks ..8y contrast, workers compensation benefits would
...continue as long as the disability lasts.
Benefits are payable only if the individual is totally
disabled from performing the duties of his regular
.,employment. Unlike workers compensation, the policy
provides no ' benefits ' for partial disability.
- Death and disability benefits are paid according to a
fixed schedule. Workers compensation benefits, by
contrast, are based on the individual's actual earnings,
from both his regular employment and his council pay.
- .Workers compensation includes various other benefits,
such as rehabilitation -, retraining, etc.; the accident
policy does not.
Workers.compensation benefits are.tax- exempt some or
all of the.benefits paid under, the accident policy might
be taxable.
Obviously, there are many Oborderl.ineff situations where it might
be debatable whether a council member is "'conducting official
council.* business on beha 1 f . and at the request of the council
For example, a mayor or council member might be asked
individually to attend a meeting of the Chamber of Commerce or a
.service club.�to discuss and explain city policies or proposals
the council is considering.. Cities might want to consider
adopting a resolution specifying whether the city considers such
activities to be.within the scope of duties that the city
expects its elected officials to perform.
For questions concerning the CIGNA accident coverage, or to put
g p
.the accident coverage into effect, contact Jaime Frischmann, The
Brehm Group., 1500 International Center, 920 Second Ave. 50.,
Minneapolis, Mn. 55402; (612) 229- 7385. Enrollment for the
accident coverage will be open through March 1, 1989. In
succeeding years -, -- there - vil l = be an annual open enrollment period
for cities during February of each year.
AGENDA ITEM .�....�...�
kotion by Council.�I
AGENDA REPORT
Endorse ..,..
TO City Manager
Re j ectecl.. 014
FROM: : Assistant City En 9 i neer Date
SUBJECT: 8out h l awn Avenue, Project 85- 17-- -- Change Order One
DATE: January 18, 1989
Attached is proposed Change Order One for the subject project and
an explanatory letter from the consulting project engineer. As
noted in the letter, the proposed change order is for an
�e tension of completion date only and does not involve additional
.cost The extension of the completion date is legitimate due to
the delay in awarding the contract from that anticipated. The
del ay of award . was due to protracted r i g h t -of --way negotiations.
it i s recommended that the change order be approved as given in
the attached resolution.
BAI
jw
Attachment
November 18, 1988
RN e it
222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484 -0272
RE: MAPLEWOOD, MN
SOUTHLAWN AVE,
S.A.P. 138 - 117 -01
CITY PROJECT NO. 85 -17
SEH FILE NO, 88082
Mr. Bruce Irish
Assistant City Engineer
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Bruce:
Enclosed are five (5) copies of Change Order No. 1 concerning
time change for the above referenced p o�ect r .
We recommend approval of this contract time change due
g to the
delay in awarding the contracts, which resulted from p roblems in
obtaining the necessary easements.
Please review and if approved by Council, return 4
( ) signed
copies to us and retain one copy for your records.
Sincerely,
,i Kenneth R. Meister
KRM /cmb
Enclosures
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRI CKSON INC.
ST PAUL.,
MINNESOTA
CHIPFIFWA FA1.1_
WISCONSIN
Agr CHANGE ORDER
ENCENEER51 /IRCHITECT51 PLANNERS
222 EAST LITTLE LE CANADA ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484-0272
OWNER City of Maplewood DATE November. 15,___1988
OWNERS PROJECT NO 85-17 S . A . P . 138-117-01 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Utility and street improvements SEH FILE NO __8.80.82__
on Southl awn Avenue and Furness Parkway,
The following changes shall be made to the contract documents
Description: Article 3. 1. - Contract time, the f irst three sentences shall be
amended as follows: 3. 1 The work will be substantially completed on or before
July 10, 1989 and completed and ready for final payment in accordance with
paragraph 14.13 of the General Condition -on or before July 30, 1989. Substan-
tial completion is the completion of all work with the exception of turf restor,
atA se .J RaO48FPe valve on Furness Parkway shall be installed and opera tiona
by May 10, 19890
The Contract time change is necessary because
delayed due to easement acquisition.
Bass of Cost: N /A n Actual o Estimated
Attachments (list supporting documents)
Contract Status
Original Contract
Net Change Prior C.O.'s to _
Change this C.O.
Revised Contract
the award of the Contract was
Time
Cost
$4421917..02
$942,947.02
Recommended for Approval: Short- Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. By
Kenneth R. Meister
Agreed to by Contractor:
BY
Title.
Distribution Contractor 2
owr1P_r t
Approved for Owner:
BY _
,.
Mn /DOT District 9 State Aid
Project Representative i SE14 Office t
SHORT ELLIOTT S! PA(Jt, ( i +rl )/'f b1 A FAL t a,
RESOLUTION .
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRAC].
� WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has
heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 85-17 and has let _a
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said
contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project E35_17v
Change Order One.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by
executing said Change Order One.
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager
Assistant City Engineer
T AGENDA ITEM -- Ll
Action by. cotmoil-0.
SUBJECT: Beam Avenue from T.H. 61 to County Road D
Project 88-12--Schedule Public Hearing
DATE: January 18, 1989
Introduction
ReJected.-, MW
The feasibility report for the subject project is transmitted
separately. It is requested that the city council schedule a
pUblic hearing on February 27, 1989~
Back
The feasibility study was ordered under council ^initiative in
April 1988. The recommendation of the feasibility study is the
' construction of a 44-foot wide street with appurtenances and
utilities from 450 feet west of the west right-of-way line of
T.H. 61, which is where th.e County State Aid Highway 19
designation terminates, to'County Road D under Municipal State
Aid standards. The total project cost is estimated to be
$110031950. MSA funding will finance $542,130 of the cost, The
balance of required funding of $461,820 is proposed to be
financed through assessments against the benefiting properties.
On a collector street to be designed to MSA standards the city
has previously utilized an assessment rate for street
construction of $36'.50 per front foot. The continued use of this
'rate for street construction may be appropriate for newly created
. frontage on the north-sbuth segment of proposed Beam Avenue.
However, it is thought that the use of this rate for frontage on
the existing paved east-west section of Beam Avenue is
inappropriate. The assessment rate for existing frontage should
reflect the fact the existing paved street provides access,
although at a marginal level of service, to existing residents.
The benefit to these properties is significantly less than for
`parcels of land with newly created frontage and lots. A rate cf
$15 per front foot for property fronting on the existing Beam
Avenue right-of-way is proposed.
The street assessment would include 44-foot wide, nine-ton design
bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter. On the
existing east-west section of Beam Avenue the curb would be a
' barrier type, designed as B618, with five foot concrete drive
aprons at existing driveways. Boulevard restoration of existing
.Project 88-12 2 January 18, 1989
'
residences would be with sod. The new7y c reat«@d section would
utilize E141.2 mountable curb to facilitate new house and driveway
construction,` Boulevard restoration would use two strips of sod
for erosion control purposes and restoration of all other Pr~oJect
disturbed areas with seed" The feasibility study notes that if
sidewalk is desired by the city, then it should be constructed on
the north and east sides of the street. Since sidewalk
construction is entirely eligible for MSA funding, the choice of
whether or not to construct sidewalk does not affect the local
share financing 'or assessments, If the project is ordered, then
the city council should determine if a sidewalk at no cost to the
city or residents is desired-
'
'
MSA ineligible costs for storm .sewer , as well as the costs for
water main aod sanitary sewers, are proposed to be directly
recovered through assessments. The attached figure delineates
the boundaries of the storm sewer assessment area. A rate of
-7.53 cents per square foat will recover required local share
costs. Water main and sanitary sewer are proposed to be extended
on the new north-south segment of proposed Beam Avenue .
Assessment rates of $24.81 per front foot and $19.65 per front
foot over the newly created frontage will recover the cost of the
'
utility extensions. Water and sanitary sewer services will be
provided to each potential lot with direct cost assessment to the
owner. The following table summarizes proposed financing for the
recommended construction of Phase 1 and 2, i.e, from T.H. 61 to
County Road D. .
*Includes service construction costs. Proposed assessment
would be by actual number at direct cost.
Assmt.
Local
Assmt.
Assmt.
Cost
Share Cost
Units
Rate
Recoygry
Street
$ 549370
51800
FF
$36.50/FF
$211,700
(new
street)
11986
FF
15"00/FF
29,790,
(reconstruction)
Sanitary Sewer
1131980*
5,800
FF
19.65/FF
1139970
Water Main
1439910*
5,800
FF
24.81/FF
143,900
Storm Sewer
199869700
SF
OnO753/SF 149
Total
$461,820
$6481960
*Includes service construction costs. Proposed assessment
would be by actual number at direct cost.
Project 88-12
3 January 18 , 1989
1t is to be noted that the proposed street assessment rates
generate an estimated excess of $187,140. These funds are
transferred. to the street construction state aid fund account .
This fund provides revenue for overlays and seal coating of local
streets and an additional revenue source to supplement funding of
local street construction.
Recommendat i can
It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resol ut ion
wh i ch schedul es a pub l i c hearing f or this project .
BA1
jc
Attachments
f• �� - - . - _ - ---- -- ,gin,- --fir -� R OA D _ -Cal t
1 . 1 s00 • ' • 11t •
4!0.•' �•
Soo- m
ic
ba
• t1•. i i 1e« '
1 1 �
M t� C51 0)
4.�,Ct 1 Io ��- • • 1.1�.
•1
i
n� z
� tton _ (ioi
1 =�•4flla• Z o X 1' • of C
CCw -'t; f'f'as0'r1 ♦- -. � r r, .« � r._ _«• _ tT�t � r .. � 1
• 4
I -scowl
•!
• r �1� w l �Z) �
• • 040
Jil 04
t � 11 1•.. t, fr
I •ill G . • ►+i �: 1 - 111 i'
,: • ` ' � 1 � . � 1) !• t, n - `•NON' 1
t, - W • r• � 1 I
� .t•ts � 1 •1
it 1 1 ' � (e) ;• -, '
1j1 • � �!'•� . 1 1
�' • 1 1 1 I
• IA • !7a• - 1O 1 � I
r y�ell • sltl ate a l _
is r r r r r • •r r - • • - — — — — l.•.— ..— .— r. r — —. .— — — _ — — —
e�• 1 e _
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
t.
ASSESSMENT AREA li tl �1
to, 10
f n o� 7
-
t0.1.9
F /
• / o
1 flO1.14 wa
A
•� • ` • w
r
' .,.et .! � ' i Q • • 1 � 0 i 0 O. 0 /1i �V � 1 • tJl • t � f_.,- .-,,.. - � -.. .•y f * . '�!. C 1' �
o« lost cos y.iu is t•� - - -.
r •.
• w•• r ` �.)li.._ _ r. w�-.. • • t . • tH. • I• •� • . -tom w • • d
• • _— r
. • (� r• 1•'.if ec f . •� , r
Ja
•yp - l0 1 / � � ..
.. Project
ell
88 -12 BEAM AVENUE
i •o
-ii t• tr- `-ir • r.-
w :..•c
TT
1••1
lose
.
II« v
ta•f �W
• 1 ' �' •s — -- — — — - -
off
• ! a
�N ' -
�� {
• vr.a. ..• u.flt .••i. 1
- t
PROPOSED 1
• N i ,
• ' ; a..x� NEW STREET CONSTRUCTION E
• t .... t......... STREET RECONSTRUCTION '
�. •trl _ - „a1t•
• z}• soot: -Z31. • -------- - - - - --
f 1
t i - •
• r
• 1 •
• 1 (tt
t
• I it+ !O Ot. tt.e 1
A
• 31
1 1 A
MUM
1 tQ•1! itn C i •
•
•
• ,♦ • / / �. : lit
•
t • flOA.” .0 t.1l�t
D••i►tlo.o,wA+ a.•�•ot.i±'w.• _ 1
1. -" - -
l Wit}. • . • • • t
JIM
• a G w. 1 1 sl ." I :.,. K• s....
V • ' • •• I ,
1*4 let
• t
JJ
Project 88 -12 BEAM AVENUE
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has
been 'authoriced and directed to prepare a report with reference
to the improvement of Beam Avenue from 450 feet west of T.H. 61
to Coumty Road D, City Project 88-12, by construction of 44-foot
'
wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, sanitary
sewer, water main, storm sewer, and appurtenances, and '
WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid
report for the improvement herein described:
'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. The report of the city engineer advising this council
that the proposed improvement on Beam Avenue from 450 feet west
of T.H. 61 to County Road Dv City Project 88-12, by construction
` of 44-foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter,
sanitary sew��ry water main, storm sewer, and appurtenances is
�
feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received"
. 20 The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in
accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited
property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
according to MSA Chapter 4�9, at an estimated total cost of the
improvement of $1,003,950=
3. A Public hearing will be held in the council chambers
of the city hall at 1830 East Count)/ Road B on Monday, the 27t1--1
da), of February, 1989, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement.
The city clerk- shall give mailed and published notice of said
hearing and improvement as required by law"
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
BEAM AVENUE
kKD'A
T.OLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
GINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -1893
612/292-4400
FAX 612/292 -0083
January 19, 1989
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Maplewood, Minnesota
Re: Feasibility Report
Beam Avenue
from TH 61 to County Road d
Maplewood, Minnesota
.Commission No. 9291
Dear Mayor and Council:
We are pleased to submit our report on the feasi bi ! ity of construct i ng Beam
Avenue and associated utilities from Trunk Highway 61 to County Road D.
Base d upon the f i n i ngs i n th i s report, it i s recommended that:
1 Beam. Avenue be constructed from a point a roximatel 450 feet west o
Trunk P y f
k Highway 61 to County Road D as one segment.
20 Beam Avenue be constructed with storm sewer, sanitary sewer and
watermain.
3* Beam Avenue be constructed to a w i dth of 44 feet to a I I ow ark i n
p 9 on
both s i des. of th i s co I I ect or route. If s i dew a I k Is considered, It
should be constructed on the north and east sides.
4* The estimated cost of these improvements is $1,003,770, Of this
amount, $542,430 Is estimated to be e l i g i b l e for Municipal State Aid
Funds.
5. The watermain loop on County Road D should be constructed at this time
If Frank Street or Carey Heights Court are ordered for improvement
this year. The estimated cost of this waterma i n loop is $1'02,200.
We also wish to acknowledge the assistance of the City engineering staff in
the preparation of this report.
Sincerely yours,
6;jjA44
t5r, -Ox
Larry D. Boh rer, P.E.
LDB : j
TOLTL, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENG INFERS -ARCH ITECTS- PLANNERS
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 18, 1989
I . hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the
I aw s of the State of Minnesota.
Larry D.vBohrer,, P.E.
Registration No. 12120
9291
8..� AVENUE - _,.F B-. 6.1._5Q QQU NT
MAPLEWQOD., , j, I RNESO
IntroductPon
The purpose of this report is to determine the cost and feasibility of
constructing Beam Avenue from TH 61 to County Road D. Beam Avenue is
classified as a minor collector route in the City's Comprehensive Plan and
is a Municipal State Aid street. The improvement considered in this report
would be paid for in part with Municipal State Aid funds.
This feasibility report was initiated because the City recently received a
proposed plat of Koh t man Lake Over ook Second Addition. This pt at w i 1
determine the alignment of Beam Avenue within the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of
Section 8 . The i mprovements within this subdivision must be sized and
constructed properly to serve that portion of the City west of TH 61,
between existing Beam Avenue and County Road D.
Beam Avenue presently extends 1,500 feet west of TH 61 and Is generally In
poor condition. The pavement varies from 32 feet wide to 16 feet wide.
Drainage fol laws along the edge of the road or In shat low ditches and is
considered Inadequate,
The Comprehensive Water
Plan recommends a trunk w aterma i n In Beam Avenue
which is also addressed in this report.
lmQrovements
1 t,
Because Beam Avenue has been designated by the City as a MSA
(Municipal State Aid) collector route, the street w i l l need to
be designed to meet MSA Standards in order to receive MSA
funding.
A nine ton design, 44 foot wide street, with concrete curb and
gutter, Is recommended. This street width will allow parking
on bath ° si des of the street. An alternative exists to construct
a 36 foot wide street and restrict parking to one side. It is
our opinion that new homeowners w i I I appreciate being permitted
to park In front of their residential property on either side of
the street. Cost estimates are presented In this report for
both street widths.
1 Proposed City policy suggests that collector streets have
sidewalk on at least one side. it is recommended that sidewalk
1 be constructed on the north and east side of Beam Avenue. These
sides were selected because there are fewer existing houses on
these sides which may object to a sidewalk and these sides w i
be exposed to more direct sunlight in the winter, thus aiding
snow melting.
-2- 9291
It is recommended. that Beam Avenue v nue be constructed as one segment
from a point 450 feet west of TH 61 (where the present County
Road designation ends) to County Road D. Completion of Beam
Avenue to County Road D will greatly enhance the general traffic
circulation through the area and provide a second access to the
area for emergency vehicles. Compl et! on of the road w i I 1 also
make the greatest use of the City?s MSA funds and thus help to
reduce future penalties.
It is possible to construct the street and utilities in two
segments with Phase I generally encompassing the work within
Kohl man Lake Overlook Second Addition and Phase 11 being the
extension of the street and ut11 ities from Koh iman Lake Overlook
Second Addition to County Road D. (See Figure t).
Prel iminary plans by the developer of Koh lman Lake Overlook
Second Addition show Beam Avenue consisting of a number of
horizontal curves without tangents between them. Because this
street w 1 (I be the main through street i n the area, i t 1 s
recommended that the alignment of Beam Avenue be designed with
fewer horizontal curves.
In addition, on Beam Avenue just north of Woodl yn Drive, the
street has a short radius reverse curve. This reverse curve
should be lengthened to provide for a minimum 300 foot radius.
It is believed that poor soi I s extend approximately 800 feet
west of TH 6 1 . It Is anticipated that this area w i l l be subcut
� approximately three feet and sand f 11 l w i l l be placed over
geotextile construction fabric to strengthen the road bed.
Because the study area Is currently being mined for sand and
gravel, it i s di f f icul t to accuratel y desi gn a street grade
based upon the existing topography. The Engineer and developer
w i I I need to work together to set the appropriate street grade.
This grade w i l l be based upon availability of f i 11, the grades
of surrounding streets and the need to provide cover for water
and sewer mains. The alignment of the street may need to be
changed slightly from the proposed plat if there Is not enough
fill available.
The f first 0.08 miles of Beam Avenue, west of TH 61, Is
designated as County Road 19. Because the County has not
developed plans for this portion of the road, they have
requested that the City begin construction approximately 450
feet west of TH 61. We recommend beginning construction at the
west property I i ne of the Toyota dealer. It may be necessary to
provide a 1 -1/2 inch overlay to the portion of road not being
Improved to extend its I fife unti I construction of County Road 19
takes place,
-3- 9291
20 Sanitary Sewer
An eight inch sanitary sewer would be extended from the existing
manhole 200 feet west of the Intersection of .Frank Street and Beam
Avenue, west and north to County Road D. (See Figure 2.)
Because the existing sanitary sewer is already shallow, the street
grade for Beam Avenue should be designed to al low for a minimum of 10
feet of cover over the sanitary sewer. Special attention should also
be given to building and lot elevations along the west side of Beam
Avenue,
The I ast manhole on the north end of Beam Avenue sh ou I d be In sta I I ed
deep enough and al i gned properly for future extension east along
County Road D to Carey Heights Drive.
3. Water= i n
A 12 inch watermain has been extended from the intersection of TH 61
and Beam Avenue, west to the end of the existing street. It is
recommended that a 12 inch watermain be extended north to the
intersection of Lydia Avenue and Beam Avenue. An eight inch waterma i n
should be extended from Lydia Avenue to County Road D. (See Figure
3.)
To create a balanced water network for the east half of the study
area, a watermain loop from Beam Avenue to Frank Street should be
constructed on County Road D. The rate of development w i I I dictate
when this loop Is constructed. The construction would be costly due
to the restoration of the County Road and the fact that benef It woul d
be provided to only one side. Also, congestion with other utilities
would create a difficult design. There would be few properties on
County Road D which w o u l . d receive water service from this loop.
4
1 As shown In Figure 4, a berm has been constructed In the low area
1 north of Kohl man Lake to control sediment during development of the
area. We recommend retaining this bermed area as a storm water
detention pond. A baffled outlet to Kohlman Lake should be
constructed to control this pond and trap sediments prior to entering
Kohlman Lake.
Surf ace water runof f from the west hal f of the study area woul d be
conveyed to this pond. Storm sewer woul d be extended to County Road D
for future extension to Frank Street. Storm sewer in Beam Avenue
wouI d be desi gned to carry th i s future f I ow.
.4_ 9291
Surf ace water f rom the east hal f of the study area wou I d be conveyed
across Beam Avenue through a proposed doub I e cu I vert. The doub I e
c u I vert w ou I d out I et to a di tch I ocated w est of the Toyota dea I ersh i p
which leads to Koh i man Lake. A 20 foot wide drainage easement along
the east side of Lot 8, Gardenia Addition would be needed.
j Pr o j ect
improvements i n this f easi bi I ity report can be grouped into three phases.
Phase I would improve Beam Avenue and complete utilities from TH 61 to
Lydia Avenue, al i within Koh I man Lake Overlook Second Addition. Phase I
improvements should be completed at this time because development in the
area Is taking place.
Phase I i woul d complete Beam Avenue and extend uti I iti es to County Road D.
Phase I I should also be completed at this time to improve the traffic
circulation to this rapidly developing area, especially for emergency
veh icl es.
Phase I i i would complete the watermain loop along County Road D to Frank
Street and In the f uture, CSAH 19. Phase I I I construct ion shout d be
completed at this time if Frank Street or Carey Heights Court is to be
constructed. If Frank Street or Carey Heights Court are not ordered at
this time, Phase I I I improvements could be delayed until development
warrants.
Beam Avenue has an existing 66 foot right -of -way from TH 61 to 50 feet west
of. Frank Street. West of Frank Street only the north 33 feet is existing.
Right -of -way through the Koh I man Lake Overlook Subdivision has been platted
for Beam Avenue. 66 foot wide right -of -way should be platted for the
remainder of Beam Avenue.
M-! 4-
A 2 0 f oot w i de d r a m a ge easement f or a d i tch w i l l be req u i red on the east
side of Lot 8 of the Gardena Addition,
A 20 foot w i de drainage easement w 11 1 al so be required between two lots
along the west side of Beam Avenue for a storm sewer outlet to the existing
pond. The exact location of this easement w i l l not be known until the
street grades have been determined.
-5- 9291
Perm its
Permits, or plan approval, wii l be required fran:
1. The Minnesota Department of Health for watermain extensions.
2. The St. Paul Water U #ility for watermain extensions.
3. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for sanitary sewer
extension.
4. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for sanitary sewer extension.
5. MnDOT for work within TH 61 right -of -way.
60 Ramsey County Highway Department for work within County Road Q right-
of-way.
79 Ramsey Wash! ngton- Metro Watershed District for grading and storm sewer
construction.
Statement of Feast,
This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The f i nanci al
f e a s i b i I i ty of this project w i l l. need to be determined by the City Council
and the land owners involved.
Est i mated Pro 1 ect ost
Attached to this report
is a detailed
estimate of construction
costs for
the improvements. The
costs quoted
herein are estimates only
and are not
guaranteed prices. Final
contracts w
i I I be awarded on a unit price
ba s i s.
The contractor w i l I
be paid only
for work completed. The
costs are
estimated based on current
construction costs.
The estimated costs are
as follows:
is Phase I
MSAEl i gib a
Street (441)
$3290230
MS-A,- _1 ne I I b l e
Street (44 1)
$ 38,970
Sanitary Sewer
$ 0
Sanitary Sewer
$ 61,430
Watermain
$ 0
Watermain
$ 830660
Storm Sewer
Storm Sewer
-92.0600
Subtotal
$384.9130
$281.9660
Total Estimated
Construction Cost
(441) $665,790
Total Estimated
Construction Cost
(361) $634,790
-6- 9291
24 Ph a se
Street (44 1) $129,700
Sanitary Sewer $ 0
Watermai n $ 0
Storm Sewer 280 4
Subtotal $158,340
Total Estimated
Construction Cost (44t) $337,980
Total Estimated
Construction Cost (36f) $318,480
3e Phase III Watorma i n Looping
Ms A...E..1.�
Waterma i n $ 0
_MS,A ..,, I-ne l i i b i e
Street (44 1) $ 15.,400
Sanitary Sewer $ 520550
Waterma i n $ 600250
Storm Sewer 1
$179,680
.MSA I nel,.iI gi bt e
Waterma i n $102,200
-7 � 9291
ERQFOSED PE W EQJ T I NE_ -SSH ED
Beam Avenue
Ma p I ew ood, Minnesota
Commission No. 9291
10
City Council Receives Feasibility Report
January 23, 1989
2*
Pub l i c Information Meeting
February 22, .1989
3.
Public Hearing
February 27, 1989
40
City Council Orders Plans and Specifications
February 27, 1989
or Abandons Project
59
Council Approves Plans and Specifications and
May 8, 1989
Orders Bids
6.
Ad for Bids Published In Legal Newspaper
May 17, 1989
7.
Ad for Bids Pu b i i sh ed In Construction B u l l et i n
May 19, 1989
8.0
Bids Received
June 7, 1989
9.
City Council Considers Bids and Awards Contract
June 12, 1989
10.
Contractor Substantially Completes Construction
August 15, 1989
1 1 .
City Council Holds Assessment Hearing
August 28, 1989
12.
Contractor Completes Final Bituminous Surface
June 1, 1990
-8a 9291
P_.1
Beam
, ,Y MSI aI_IEUE
Avenue
Map I ew ood, Minnesota
Commission
No. 9291
M AS
Item
E.,._ I_ - SAN, I TAR Y SEWER
Unit
1
Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer
1 .0
EA
$
1, 000.00
$
10000900
2
811 PVC 0 -10t Deep
1150.0
LF
$
12.00
$
13,800.00
3
811 PVC 10-121 Deep
600.0
LF
$
14.00
$
80400.00
4
Std.. V Diameter Manhole
10 * -0
EA
$
10000900
$
100000,00
5
Extra Depth Manhole
10.0
LF
$
80000
$
800.00
6
.8" x 41' Wye
2990
EA
$
45.00
$
1,305900
ff -Pipe
Subtotal
$
42,305.00
+ 10% Contingencies
$
4 , 2 3 5.0 0
+ 32% Indirect Costs
1
14.890, Q.Q .
Total Estimated Cost
$
61,430o 0 0
-9- 9291
PR EL I M IN ffl-K.-JOD S T EST I,MATE
Beam Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota
Commission No. 9291
PHASE
. � - ..MEE 3MA.I N
Unit
Item
1
Connect to Existing Waterma i n
1 90
EA
$
10000.00
$
1,000.00
2
611 DIP Waterma i n
75.0
LF
$
12.00
$
900000
3
811 D I P Waterma in
180.0
LF
$
14900
$
2,520900
4
121'. DIP Waterma i n
1400.0
LF
$
22.00
$
30,800.00
5
611 Hub Hydrant
5.0
EA
$
1,100.00
$
5,500.00
6
6" Gate Valve
5.0
EA
$
350.00
$
1,750.00
7
8" Gate Valve
2.0
EA
$
450900
$
900.00
8
121 Butterfly Valve
1 .0
EA
$
80.0900
$
800000
9
1Q
111 Copper Service
KJ D_ LE E-1 ±t I n as
1000.0
2300.0
LF
La.,
$
10000
$
100000000
3-J2,0_0
Subtota 1
$
57,620.00
+ 10% Contingencies
$
5,760900
+ 32% Indirect Costs
$
20.28Q 00
Total Estimated Cost
$
83,660.00
-10- 9291
PREL.. j M I Y 0 S T, ,SS T i MATE
Beam Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota
Commission No. 9291
:'HAS - STORM S EWER
Item Unit
1
Connect to Existing Storm Sewer
1 .0
EA
$
1,000.00
$
1,000.00
2
1211 RCP
24090
LF
$
15.00
$
30600.00
3
2711 RCP
450.0
LF
$
28.00
$
120600.00
4
3.011 RCP
330.0
LF
$
34.00
$
11,220.00
5
4211 RCP
30090
LF
$
50.00
$
150000.00
6
36" RC Flared End Section
4.0
EA
$
1,000.00
$
4,000.00
7
4211 RC Flared End Section
1 .0
EA
$
1,200.00
$
1,200.00
8
Catch Basins
23.0
EA
$
1,200.00
$
27,600.00
9
Rip Rap
40.0
CY
$
40.00
$
10600.00
Subtotal
$105,020.00
+ 10% Contingencies
$
10,500.00
+ 32% Indirect Costs
$
3.6.980.00
Total Estimated Cost $152,500.00
-11- 9291
PR EL
Beam
I M I N Y, 0 T EST I MATE
Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota
Commission
No. 9291
PHASE
Item
I , -_.S TR E F TS
Unit
1
Cl ear and Grub Trees
190
LS
$
1,000.00
$
10000000
2
Remove and Dispose of Bituminous
4000.0
SY
$
1.00
$
40000.00
3
Common Excavati on
40000.0
CY
$
1 .50
$
600000900
4
Subgr ade Excavation
2000.0
Cy'
$
3.50
$
70000900
5
Geotext i l e Fabric
2000.0
SY
$
3.00
$
60000900
6
Concrete Curb and Gutter, B618
.5100.0
LF
$
.5.00
$
250500.00
7
51 Concrete Sidewalk
12750.0
SF
$
1 .70
$
21,675.00
8
Class 5 Gravel
10430.0
TN
$
6.00
$
62,580.00
9
Bituminous Base Course
1415.0
TN
$
12.00
$
16,980.00
10
Bituminous Wear Course
106590
TN
$
14.00
$
14,910.00
11
Bituminous Material for Mix
140.0
TN
$
160.00
$
22,400.00
12
Tack Coat
600.0
GA
$
1900
$
600900
.13
Silt Fence
2000..0
LF
$
1 950
$
30000.00
14
Seeding
290
AC
$ 2,000.00
$
40000.00
Subtotal
$253 , 645.00
+ 10% Contingencies
$
250365.00
+ 32% Indirect Costs
$
89.290, 0 0
Total Estimated Cost (441)*
$3 68 , 2 00.0 0
The total estimated cost of a 36t wide street wou I d be about $31 , 000
less, or $337,200.
-12- 9291
PR EL I M I N AR Y OQ,j EST I
Beam Avenue
Ma p I ew ood, M i n ne sota
Commission No. 9291
?1- ASE I I - SAN 1T.AiY.,... ER
Item Unit
1
Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer
1 .0
EA
$
10000.00
$
10000.00
2
811 PVC 0--101 Deep
160090
LF
$
12.00
$
19,200.00
3
Std. 41 Diameter Manhole
6.0
EA
$
1,000.00
$
6,000.00
4
Outside Drop 0--61
190
EA
$
10000.00
$
10000.00
5
Extra Depth Manhole
890
LF
$
80.00
$
640900
6
811 x 4" Wye
3 0. 0
EA
$
45900
$
10350900
Subtotal
$
36,190.00
+ 10% Contingencies
$
3, 620.00
+ 32% Indirect Costs
_2-j4q -,Q0
Total Estimated Cost $ 52 , 5 50.0 0
-13-- 9291
P_RE - I M I N Y 00ST_ EST l_M,A_TE
Beam Avenue
Ma p I ew ood, M i n ne sota
Commission No. 9291
?}SAS E,.. I L. - W ATE R MA I N
Item unit
1
Connect to Existing Waterma i n
1.0
EA
$
1,000.00
$
10000900
2
6" DIP Watermain
5090
LF
$
12.00
$
600.00
3
811 DIP Watermai n
160090
LF
$
14.00.
$
22,400.00
4
611 Hub Hydrant
3.0
EA
$
1,100.00
$
3,300.00
5
61: Gate Valve
3.0
EA
$
350900
$
1,050.00
6
811 Gate Valve
2.0
EA
$
450.00
$
900900
7
1" Copper Service
1000.0
LF
$
10000
$
10, 000.00
Subtotal
$
410500.00
+ 10% Contingencies
$
4$15O.00
+ 32% Indirect Costs
1 14.600&
Total Estimated Cost $ 6 0, 2 50.0 0
--14- 9291
EBEL I-MINARY. -CO-ST., EST
Beam Avenue
Ma p I ew ood, M i n ne sota
Commission No. 9291
Item
-NQ-
gum wtlti-
Unit
-Echc-e
&Qunt
1
Connect to Existing Storm Sewer
1 .0
EA
$
1,000.00
$
1,000.00
2
1211 RCP
150.0
LF
$
15.00
$
2 :250.00
3
1811 RCP
300.0
Lr
$
20.00
$
60000900
4
21" RCP
900.0
LF
$
25.00
$
22,500.00
5
3611 RCP
300.0
LF
$
38900
$
11,400900
Subtotal
$
55,150.00
+ 10% Contingencies
$
5,520900
+ 32% Indirect Costs
1
12.4.1,0 -.,00
Tota.1 Estimated Cost
$
809080900
- 15- 9291
Beam Avenue
Ma p I ew ood, M i n ne sota
Commission No. 9291
PHASE
Item
11 - STREETS
Unit
1
Clear and Grub Trees
1 .0
LS
$
19000.00
$
1,000.00
2
Common ExcavatI on
4000.0
CY
$
1.50
$
6,000.00
3
Concrete Curb and Gutter, B618
265090
LF
$
5.00
$
130250.00
4
Class 5 Gravel
6550.0
TN
$
6.00
$
39,300.00
5
Bituminous Base Course
900.0
TN
$
12.00
$
10,800.00
6
Bituminous Wear Course
670.0
TN
$
14.00
$
9,380.00
7
Bituminous Material for Mix
90.0
TN
$
160900
$
140400900
8
Tack Coat
400.0
GA
$
1000
$
400.00
9
Silt Fence
1600.0
LF
$
1.50
$
2,400.00
10
Seeding
1 90
AC
$ 2 , 000.0 0
$
2 , 0 00.0 0
Subtotal
$
99,930900
+ 10% Contingencies
$
. 9,990.00
+ 32% Indirect Costs
$_
35.01 80-11 0
Total Estimated Cost (441)*
$145,100.00
The total estimated cost for
a 361 wide street
would be
$19,500 less,
or $125,600.
-16- 9291
PR EL
Beam .
I I NARY 00 ST E ST I MATE
Avenue
Ma. p I ew ood, . M i n ne sota
Commission
No. 9291
PHASE
Item
WiUE R. M I N - -1 -OMI
Unit
1
Connect to Exist i n9 Waterma i n
2.0
EA
$
1,000.00
$
20000900
2
611 DIP Watermai n
50.0
LF
$
12.00
$
600.00
3
8" DIP Waterma i n
95090
LF
$
14.00
$
130300.00
4
611 Hub Hydrant
2.0
EA
$
1,100900
$
2,200.00
5
611 Gate Valve
2.0
EA
$
350900
$
700.00
6
8" Gate Valve
3.0
EA
$
450.00
$
1,350.00
7
111 Copper Service
50.0
LF
$
10.00
$
500.00
8
MJ DIP Fittings
1500.0
LB
$
1950
$
2,250900
Subtotal
$
700400.00
+ 10% Contingencies
$
7 , 0 40.0 0
+ 32% Indirect Costs
1
24,.160_..00
Total Estimated Cost
$102,200.00
_17_ 9291
v
I
4
33
4
F
i
E �
r
i
i
1
i
Q
0
Q
,
Z
Q
U
BEGIN PHASE 11
w
.J
1
1 ;
t
i'
f
4 �KOH LM AN LAKE
BEGIN PHASE I TOYOTA
BEAM AVENUE
STREET &UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
COMM.NO. 9299
Q
D
Q
Z
Q
U
W
J
f-
t •
t •
lKOHLMAN LAKE
s
r2,T2.fw%r- nw►2 r.
EX.. SAN.S.-
I
BEAM AVENUE
STREET &UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
COM M. N O. 9291
SANITARY SEWER
r.3 3 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 4 Ex. io' wM COUNTY
- FUTURE III
LOOP � c�
Mi
(33 34
V-4--1 5
R AD D
FUTURE 8 WM
of
i
FUTURE 8 °WM
` PROF I
FUTUREr
8"wm
� wI
i W I w � �
a �� u�i � o � � � FUTURE 8 wm
cn
omo
Cl
-T LYDIA '1
� dop AVE*
� \ a
7 \ Ex. e" � J a ' FUTURE 12" Wm
C6
� U
PROP. - Ex. e'
�; - ---•
1211 wm I n
F � LL �
"NNW
a KOHLMAN LAKE \ BEAM \� AVE. I
EX. 12' EX. 12"
BEAM AVENUE
STREET &UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS.
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
COMM.NO. 9291
WATERMAIN
FIGURE 3
3
r i i oir i i m roo t"% eir e%
EX. POND
(BERMED p
AREA)
Is
p
PROP
OUTLET !
,— --
KOHLMAN LAKE ST. S.
a BEAM AVE.
PROP. 27" ...••
ST. S. soon 40000 "r L �m mmm (2) 36" 1
CULV.
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
COMM.NO. 9291
FIGURE 4
�
�a
Q
�m
a°
'
PF
3E
!i
12
F—
F—
EX. POND
(BERMED p
AREA)
Is
p
PROP
OUTLET !
,— --
KOHLMAN LAKE ST. S.
a BEAM AVE.
PROP. 27" ...••
ST. S. soon 40000 "r L �m mmm (2) 36" 1
CULV.
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
COMM.NO. 9291
FIGURE 4
� ,TO:
FROM:
. AGENDA ITEM
Action �� Colnumil�
AGENDA REPORT -~
Endorsed
City Manager Modified.--
R�~��~
Assistant City Engineer
Date—
SUBJECT: Carey Heights Drive, Kohl man Lake Overlook Plat to
County Road D, Project 88-09--Schedule Public Hearing
DATE: January 18, 1989
Introduction
Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report for the subJect
project. Attached is a resolution to schedule a public hearing.
Background
The feasibility report identified and evaluated three alternative
configurations for a potential through street on Carey Heights
Drive or immediately to the west on Frank Street. It was found
' that a through street on Frank Street with cul-de-sacs on Carey
.
Heights drive abutting the NSP and AMOCO easement area provides
for acceptable street designs from an engineering viewpoint.
Whereas, the constraints on Carey Heights Drive preclude an
acceptable through street from an engineering viewpoint. The
selected option also allows for the most cost effective
development of the entire study area.
The estimated project cost of the construction of Frank Street
from Kohlman Lake Overlook plat to County Road D is $439,985. If
.the construction of the south cul-de-sac on Carey'Heights Drive
'
is included with-Frank Street as a single city project, then the
total estimated project cost is $619,045. In both cases, city
cost participation of approximately $82,700 is recommended. It
is proposed that the_required city financing be obtained from the
excess financing of the Beam Avenue Project through the state aid
street construction fund. The balance of funding would be
through assessments as discussed in the feasibility report.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the attached resolution, which schedules a
public hearing, be adopted.
BAI
jw
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has
~' beenm\��thori��d`anddirected'to prepare areport with reference
to the improvement of Care*yHeights Drive from- Kohlman Lake
'Overlook plat to County Road D, City Project 88-09, by
. construction of 32 foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb
and gutter, utilities, and appurtenances, and
'
WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid
report for the improvement herein described:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. The report of the city engineer advising this council
that the proposed improvement on Frank Street from Kohlman Lake
Overlook- plat to County Road D and Carey Heights Drive south cul-
de_sac, City Project 88-09, by construction of 32 foot wide
bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, utilities, and
appurtenances .is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is
hereby received.
' 2. The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in
accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited
^ property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the
improvement of $619v0450
31A A public hearing will be held in the council chambers
of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 27th
day of February, 1989, at 7:10 p.m. to consider said improvement.
The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said
hearing and improvement as required by lawn
AGENDA ITEM
'
Action by lln
AGENDA REPORT
E~d_-_--_-
TO: City Manager Mod-If1m���~�~��'
FROM: Assistant City Engineer ~
SUBJECT: T.H. 61 Water Main, Kohl man Avenue to Beam Avenue
Project 87-44--Change Order One
DATE: January 18, 1989
Introduction
. After the completion of bidding for the subject project, the St.
Paul We/ter Utility requested significant changes in the design of
_ the casing pipe crossing under Beam Avenue at increased cost. On
` January 12, 1989, test piles were driven by the contractor. The
anticipated piling depth of 30 feet must be increased to 50 feet
'- to provide adequate bearing capacity. This will significantly
increase the cost of the remaining work primarily due.to the
increased quantity and to some extent an increase in unit cost
' requested by the contractor to cover additional material and
' handling 'costs of the longer piles. Prior to authorizing this
work, the authorization of_the city council is requested.
The extension of trunk water main north from Kohlman Avenue to
' the platted Radatz Avenue right-of-way along the T.H. 61 frontage
,road has been completed without notable event. The contractor
has delayed the construction of Phase 2 across the wetland north
. to Beam Avenue to a]low for freezing of the peat to allow for
improved equipment access. As noted in the introduction, the
test piles indicated that the underlying soils are not as strong
as anticipated. The strength of underlying soils was calculated
based on boring logs and adjacent utility piling records.
There are three options at this juncture. The-contract could be
modified as necessary based on review comments by St. Paul Water
Utility and actual piling design to complete the water main loop
to Beam Avenue. A second option involves termination of the
construction contract at this point without completing the
wetTand crossing and water main loop. The third option is to '
modify the contract to cover actual piling requirements but to
construct the casing pipe crossing and connection to the existing
water main on the north side of Beam Avenue with the least cost
design possible. The redesign of the casing pipe crossing would
significantly reduce the cost increase to complete the water main
loop, but it may not receive water utility approval .
Project 87-44 2
- January 18v 1989
A tabulation of revised quantities and extra costs to construct
the water main as currently designed and incorporating additional
piling depth and St~ Paul Water Utility design changes is
attached. The following table gives a comparison of the
financing, proposed at the public hearing, assessment hearing, and
current as-built cost to complete:
FINANCING SUMMARY REVIEW
Public
Costs
Construction Cost
with Contingency $163,765
Engineering &
Indirect Costs
Total o a $213,120
Financing Assessments 107,734
City Funds
Total ' $213,120
Assessment As-Built
Hearin!R Est i mate
$1421399.00 $176,872
5 19,97 50q11.3
$194,218.97 $226,985
641303.42 64,303
$1941218.97 $226,985
`
Due to the fact that the contractor has incurred significant cost
to mobilize equipment, drive test piles and monitor test pile
' results as part of the preparatory work for Phase 2, payment to
the contractor would be required if the project is terminated at
this point' The costs for the foregoing work, as well as return and restocking charges for material already delivered to the Job
site, would amount to an estimated $28,000. If it is determined
to terminate the project at this point, then this amount will be
wasted. Furthermore, it should be noted that the completion of
the water main loop will provide for a reliable, redundant water
supply to the developing area northwest of Beam Avenue and T.H.
/61. This is particularly significant in view of pending
proposals for additional development in the area benefiting by
the completion of the water main loop to Beam Avenue.
The consulting project engineer is in the process of negotiating
with the St. Paul Water Utility to determine if they will modify
their directive concerning design modifications of the casing
pipe connection to Beam Avenue. A further review of the design
of the connection to the existing Beam Avenue water main and T.H.
61 crossing pipes is also being made to determine if these costs
Project 37 -44 3 .January 18, 1 939
can . be reduced. A letter from the consulting project engineer
evaluating the potential cost savings from these modifications is'
forthcoming.
Recommendat i on
It is requested that the council should determine which approach
it desires to -be undertaken. A detailed change order based on
this determination will subsequently be presented for
ratification.
is
January 19, 1989
Kenneth Haider
Director of Public Works
1830 County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: TH 61 Trunk Watermain
Maplewood, Minnesota
Commission No. 9225
Gentlemen:
Bruce Irish
Assistant City Engineer
1830 County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a project status report
and to inform you of a construction difficulty which could cause a
substantial impact on the project budget.
The present status of the project is that the watermain is complete and in
service from Kohlman Avenue to Raditz Avenue. Only the turf restoration
remains for this portion of the project. The northerly one -half of the
project is not completed and involves crossing the swamp between Raditz
Avenue and Beam Avenue, and the crossing under Beam Avenue. The watermain
which crosses the swamp is planned to be placed on piling. Construction
difficulties were encountered immediately upon driving of the test piles.
Since these encountered difficulties may have a substantial impact on the
project budget, all work has stopped until direction of the City Staff or
City Council.
The length of piling described in the plans and specifications was
determined by the soil borings and penetration tests conducted during the
design of the project. Upon driving four test piles and conducting dynamic
load tests on those piles, it became apparent that significantly deeper
piles will have to be driven in order to provide the required load
carrying capability. The piling quantities listed in the Bid Proposal
assumed various pile lengths up to 30 feet deep. The piling lengths based
on the actual load tests indicate 50 foot long piles will be needed. This
causes a cost increase in two areas. Firstly, the total length of piling
to be furnished and driven will be much greater; and secondly, the unit
cost to purchase 50 foot long piles is greater than 30 foot long piles.
The estimated cost increase to furnish and drive additional lengths of
piling is $27,530 and the estimated additional material cost is $5,120.
Other cost extras not related to the piling but related to other fittings
DUVAN,ANDERSON
ANDA KING.OU,INC ANDERSON
TKDA
AND
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
-
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 5 51 01 -1 89 3
612/292 -4400
FAX 612/292 -0083
January 19, 1989
Kenneth Haider
Director of Public Works
1830 County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: TH 61 Trunk Watermain
Maplewood, Minnesota
Commission No. 9225
Gentlemen:
Bruce Irish
Assistant City Engineer
1830 County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a project status report
and to inform you of a construction difficulty which could cause a
substantial impact on the project budget.
The present status of the project is that the watermain is complete and in
service from Kohlman Avenue to Raditz Avenue. Only the turf restoration
remains for this portion of the project. The northerly one -half of the
project is not completed and involves crossing the swamp between Raditz
Avenue and Beam Avenue, and the crossing under Beam Avenue. The watermain
which crosses the swamp is planned to be placed on piling. Construction
difficulties were encountered immediately upon driving of the test piles.
Since these encountered difficulties may have a substantial impact on the
project budget, all work has stopped until direction of the City Staff or
City Council.
The length of piling described in the plans and specifications was
determined by the soil borings and penetration tests conducted during the
design of the project. Upon driving four test piles and conducting dynamic
load tests on those piles, it became apparent that significantly deeper
piles will have to be driven in order to provide the required load
carrying capability. The piling quantities listed in the Bid Proposal
assumed various pile lengths up to 30 feet deep. The piling lengths based
on the actual load tests indicate 50 foot long piles will be needed. This
causes a cost increase in two areas. Firstly, the total length of piling
to be furnished and driven will be much greater; and secondly, the unit
cost to purchase 50 foot long piles is greater than 30 foot long piles.
The estimated cost increase to furnish and drive additional lengths of
piling is $27,530 and the estimated additional material cost is $5,120.
Other cost extras not related to the piling but related to other fittings
Mr. Kenneth Haider
Mr. Bruce Irish
January 19, 1989
Page Two
needed for connecting to the existing watermain at Kohiman Avenue or
structures requested by the Saint Paul Water Utility raise the total
estimated cost to $169,266.20, which is $39,781.95 over the original bid.
The attached Estimated Final Quantities and Estimated Compensating Change
Order itemize these costs.
In evaluating the impact of this estimated cost increase on the project
budget, one must evaluate the total project cost. At the time the
feasibility report was prepared, the total estimated cost, including
construction, contingency, engineering, administration, legal, fiscal and
easements, was $216,170. The present total cost, 14ncluding the above
described extras, is estimated to be $219,378. Even though the estimated
final cost and the cost in the feasibility report are very close, we
understand the budget shortfall occurs because the costs known at the time
of the assessment hearing were much lower than those shown in the
feasibility report. We understand that the City Staff will address this
budget shortfall in more detail.
We see the following options available to the City:
tion i
Complete the project as planned for a total project cost estimated to
be $219,378. This is the preferred option if the budget can tolerate
the increase. The original need for looping the watermain to Beam
Avenue was two-fold:
Firstly, most of the area north of Beam Avenue is planned for business
warehouses which have a high fire flow demand. Our analysis showed
that these demands could not be met with the single 12" watermain and
still provide adequate residual pressure for the high residential area
west of TH 61.
Secondly, completing this loop will greatly improve reliability.
Presently, the Beam Avenue watermain west of Hazelwood Avenue is not
interconnected. Watermain extensions to developments west of TH 61
and north of Beam Avenue would result in a dead end watermain 1.5
miles in Length. Should a break occur anywhere along Beam Avenue, a
substantial area could be without water service for several hours.
Mr. Kenneth Haider
Mr. Bruce Irish
January 19, 1989
Page Three
Complete the project but eliminate the redundant connection at TH 61.
The original project contemplated constructing 160 feet of 8"
watermain between 'Beam Avenue and TH 61 as a parallel connection.
This parallel watermain could be eliminated for a cost savings of
approximately $6,500. The present project could function as planned
without this parallel connection; however, the parallel connection
should be made not later than whenever watermain is extended north
along the east side of TH 61 toward Venburg Tire.
Eliminate the watermain loop from Lametti's contract. This is the
least desirable alternative because it does not achieve the two
original goals previously listed under Option 1. The cost that might
have to be paid to Lametti for demobilization, returning the pipe and
materials already on the job, driving the test piles, and performing
the pile load testing could be about $28,000. Some of this money
would not be wasted if the piling portion of the Job were immediately
re -bid. However, we doubt that re- bidding the project would result in
lower cost. Most of the cost overrun is attributable to the need to
drive more pile, not as an "extra" for the same amount of work.
We are available to attend the Council meeting of January 23, 1989 if
further explanation is desired.
Sincerely yours,
Larry D. Bohrer, P.E.
Project Manager
LDB:j
TH 61 WATERMAIN
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO. 9225
1
CONN TO EX WM, CROSS OR VALVE
2.00
EA
540.00
1,080.00
2
CUT INTO EX 12" WATERMAIN
1.00
EA
790.00
790.00
3
6" DIP CL 53 WM 7' -6" COVER
33.00
LF
19.00
627.00
4
811 DIP CL 52 WM PLAN DEPTH
162.00
LF
26.00
4,212.00
5
12" DIP CL 52 WM PLAN DEPTH
1880.00
LF
20.00
37,600.00
6
12" DIP CL 52 WM MECH JOINT
90.00
LF
16.00
1,440.00
7
TUBE TYPE POLYETHYLENE ENCASE
2075.00
LF
0.40
830.00
8
6" MJ RES SEAT GV W /BOX
5.00
EA
250.00
1,250.00
9
8" MJ RES SEAT GV W /BOX
1.00
EA
350.00
350.00
10
12" MJ BUTTERFLY VALVE W /BOX
5.00
EA
650.00
3,250.00
11
6" MJ HUB HYDRANT 81 -6" BURY
3.00
EA
1170.00 -
3,510.00
12
MJ CIP FITTINGS W /REACT BACK
6700.00
LB
0.55
3,685.00
13
TRENCH EXCAV -INTSL BY WAT UT
40.00
LF
8.00
320.00
14
1 -1/2" AIR VENT
4.00
EA
220.00
880.00
15
24" CASING PIPE
90.00
LF
150.00
13,500.00
16
FURN /DELV WOOD PIPING
3230.00
LF
10.50
33,915.00
17
IN -PLACE TREATED WOOD PILING
3230.00
LF
2.00
6,460.00
18
TREATED WOOD PILE BENT CAP
32.60
EA
800.00
25,600.00
19
REPL EX SS SERV W /PVC SDR 26
22.00
LF
26.00
572.00
20
CONN TO EX 2" COPPER WAT SER
1.00
EA
420.00
420.00
21
CONN TO EX 6" DIP WAT SERV
1.00
EA
440.00
440.00
22
4" POLYSTYRENE SHEET INSUL
112.00
SF
1.60
179.20
23
REMV /DISP OONC SIDEWALK /STEP
280.00
SF
1.00
280.00
24
4" CONC SIDEWALK OR STEPS
280.00
SF
4.00
1,120.00
25
REMV /DISP CMP CULVERT
0.00
LF
15.00
0.00
26
REMV /DISP OONC HEADWALL
0.00
EA
150.00
0.00
27
24" CMP APRON
1.00
EA
400.00
400.00
28
CLEAR TREES
3.00
EA
100.00
300.00
29
GRUB STUMPS
3.00
EA
50.00
150.00
30
BIT PVMT /AGG BASE REML /DISPL
400.00
SY
1.00
400.00
31
CL 5 GRAVEL, 100% CRUSHED
10.00
32
BIT PATCHING, 2
400.00
SY
8.00
3,200.00
33
TOPSOIL BORROW
200.00
1.00
CY
AC
5.00
1000.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
34
ROADSIDE SEEDING
100.00
LB
10.00
1,000.00
35
36
SEED, MIXTURE NO 5
COMM FERTILIZER 10 -10 -10
500.00
37
MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1
2,00
TN
150.00
300.00
38
SODDING
4000.00
SY
1.25
-- 5,000 00
157,060.20
EXTRAS
BLOW OFF MANHOLE
1.00 EA
1300.00
666.00
1,300.00
666.00
1
2
SCOUR PAD
1.00 EA
100.00 LF
20.00
2,000.00
3
TUBE INSULATION
4.00 EA
160.00
640.00
4
EASEMENT MARKERS
3241.00 LF
0.40
1,280.00
5
6
ADD COST TO DRIVE
12" X 18" OFFSET FITTING
1.00 EA
120.0
1,200.00
7
ADDITIONAL PILE MATERIAL COST
3200.00 LF
1.660
1
- 5_120 00
TOTAL 169,266.20
Item Contract Quantity Unit Net
No._ Description Quantity to Date Difference Price Change_____
1 CONN TO EX WM, CROSS OR VALVE
2
EA
2.00
0
540.00
$
0.00
2 CUT INTO EX 12" WATERMAIN
1
EA
1.00
0
790.00
$
0.00
3 6" DIP CL 53 WM 7' -6" COVER
32
LF
33.00
+ 1
19.00
+$
19.00
4 8" DIP CL 52 WM PLAN DEPTH
162
LF
162.00
0
26.00
$
0.00
5 12" DIP CL 52 WM PLAN DEPTH
1,880
LF
1880.00
0
20.00
$
0.00
6 12" DIP CL 52 WM MECH JOINT
85
LF
90.00
+ 5
16.00
+$
80.00
7 TUBE TYPE POLYETHYLENE ENCASE
2,074
LF
2075.00
+ 1
0.40
+$
0.40
8 6" MJ RES SEAT GV W /BOX
4
EA
5.00
+ 1
250.00
+$
250.00
9 8" MJ RES SEAT GV W /BOX
1
EA
1.00
0
350.00
$
0.00
10 12" MJ BUTTERFLY VALVE W /BOX
5
EA
5.00
0
650.00
$
0.00
11 6" MJ HUB HYDRANT 8' -6" BURY
3
EA
3.00
0
1170.00
$
0.00
12 MJ CIP FITTINGS W /REACT BACK
5,003
LB
6700.00
+1697
0.55
+$
933.35
13 TRENCH EXCAV - INTSL BY WAT UT
50
LF
40.00
- 10
8.00
-$
80.00
14 1 -1/2" AIR VENT
4
EA
4.00
0
220.00
$
0.00
15 24" CASING PIPE
85
LF
90.00
+ 5
150.00
+$
750.00
16 FURN /DELV WOOD PIPING
1,170
LF
3230.00
+2060
10.50
+$21,630.00
17 IN -PLACE TREATED WOOD PILING
920
LF
3230.00
+2310
2.00
+$ 4,620.00
18 TREATED WOOD PILE BENT CAP
33
EA
32.00^
- 1
800.00
-$
800.00
19 REPL EX SS SERV W /PVC SDR 26
60
LF
22.00
- 38
26.00
-$
988.00
20 CONN TO EX 2" COPPER WAT SER
1
EA
1.00
0
420.00
$
0.00
21 CONN TO EX 6" DIP WAT SERV
1
EA
1.00
0
440.00
$
0.00
22 4" POLYSTYRENE SHEET INSUL
1,230
SF
112.00
-1118
1.60
-$
1,788.80
23 REMV /DISP CONC SIDEWALK /STEP
200
SF
280.00
+ 80
1.00
+$
80.00
24 4" CONC SIDEWALK OR STEPS
200
SF
280.00
+ 80
4.00
+$
-$
320.00
150.00
25 REMV /DISP CMP CULVERT
10
LF
0.00
- 10
1
15.00
150.00
-$
150.00
26 REMV /DISP CONC HEADWALL
1
EA
0.00
1.00
-
0
400.00
$
0.00
27 24" CMP APRON
1
3
EA
EA
3.00
0
100.00
$
0.00
28 CLEAR TREES
6
EA
3.00
- 3
50.00
-$
150.00
29 GRUB STUMPS
30 BIT PVMT /AGG BASE REM1L /DISPL
325
Sy
400.00
+ 75
1.00
+$
75.00
31 CL 5 GRAVEL, 100% CRUSHED
120
TN
150.00
+ 30
10.00
8.00
+$
+$
300.00
600.00
32 BIT PATCHING, 2"
325
SY
400.00
+ 75
0
5.00
$
0.00
33 TOPSOIL BORROW
200
0.5
CY
AC
200.00
1.00
+ 0.5
1000.00
+$
500.00
34 ROADSIDE SEEDING
0
11.00
FERTILIZER 10-10-10
36 COMM�FERTILI 0
250
LB
500.00
+ 250
+$
250.00
150.00
37 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1
1
TN
2.00
+ 1
150.00
+$
625.00
3 500
SY
4000 00
+ 500
1.25
±$
38 SODDING
+$27,57!).9.')
SUBTOTAL
EXTRB
0 EA
1.00
+ 1
1300.00
+$
1,300.00
1 BLOW OFF MANHOLE
0 EA
1.00
+ 1
666.00
+$
666.00
2 SCOUR PAD
0 LF
100.00
+ 100
20.00
+$
2,000.00
3 TUBE INSULATION
0 EA
4.00
4
160.00
+$
640.00
4 EASEMENT MARKERS
0 LF
3240.00
+3240
0.40
+$
1,280.00
5 ADD COST TO DRIVE
0 EA
1.00
+ 1
1200.00
+$
1,200.00
„ „
6 12 X 18 OFFSET FITTING
IF
3200 00
+3200
JL60
+$
5,120.00
AT RIA I COST
0
+$12,206.00
SUBTOTAL
+$39,781.95
NET CHANGE
AGENDA NO ,- L
AGENDA REPORT Action,
by Co
unoll
TO: Mayor and City Council n c� 1 Endorsed„„ r
-.
Ado d i fi e d--..........
FROM: City Manager. Re j eete
Dat e
RE: GOAL SETTING TEAM BUILDING / DING SESSION
DATE:
January 7 19
Y 89
INTRODUCTION
During the one ast "one-half -
p and years there have be •
B been discussions ons on a
council/Staff Goal Setting/Team.
Building Session. The need re for it, the length,
and location have never been a -
g ed on, and therefore a session has not occurred.
DISCUSSION
I continue to feel that - •
a two- day Council /Staff Workshy would •
to the people involved, as well- a p be .very beneficial
c� al
from so s the City ty of Maplewood. However I h
me Councilmembers that they would prefer, � have sensed
first, and .then co meeting with each de artme
consider the two -day workshop, p nt
.
It is requested that '
the City Manager be given directi
Council /Staff workshop r schedule on to pursue the two -day
and individual p — ule meetings between the Council '
� victual departments and then bring � City Manager
consideration,
g back the Council /Staff workshop - p for
MAM:-1nb
AGENDA NO.
Aoti.on by. Counoil,- -:l
AGENDA REPORT
EndoxeeA
�
' ie� - -
T0: Mayor and City Council odi
Rejected
FROM: City Manager - Dente
�
RE: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR AND ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SALARIES
DATE: January 18, 1988
INTRODUCTION
The Director and Deputy Director of Emergency Management have not received
a
salary increase for four years. I don't know why it was not adjusted on a earl
basis, but in the.future this should be reviewed annually.
� yearly
y
DISCUSSION
I attempted to do a survey on what other cities pay their Emergency Man a ement
personnel, but because 9 y g
p of the wide range in duties, number of hours worked and
who performs the duties, did not find it helpful.
I then compared what increases have.been given to other City employees
last g y p ogees for the
a four years and found that increases averaged 4% per year. Using hese
figures as a guideline, del i ne an increase g
g ease to $600 /month for the Director and $375 /month
for the Deputy Director seem appropriate.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Emergency Management Director salary y be increased to
$600 /month and the Deputy Director to $375 /month.
MAM:1nb