Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 10-27 City Council Manager Workshop PacketAGENDA CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP Monday, October 27, 2003 Council Chambers, City Hall 6:00 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA D. NEW BUSINESS Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board Vacancy Interviews E. FUTURE TOPICS Sidewalk Study-Overall City Plan F. ADJOURNMENT City CounciUManager Workshop 10-27-03 Agenda #D1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION and COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPOINTMENTS DATE: October 17, 2003 INTRODUCTION The planning commission has a vacancy created by the resignation of Matt Ledvina and the community design review board (CDRB) has a vacancy created by the resignation of Craig Jorgenson. The city received three applications from persons interested in serving on one or both boards. I have attached location maps of the planning commissioners, CDRB members, and applicants, as well as the three candidate's applications. (See pages three through twelve.) DISCUSSION The planning commission's rules of procedure state that the commission shall recommend candidates based on qualifications and by trying to have a representative geographical distribution of members. The CDRB ordinance specifies that the city council shall appoint CDRB members as follows: two architects, if available; two members shall be from a related design or construction field, and at least two members shall be citizen laypersons. All members shall be able to read and interpret architectural drawings to judge the effect of a proposed building, structure, or sign upon the surrounding community. The city council's policy for advisory board appointments is as follows: A description of the advisory board's purpose and responsibilities will be included with each application. 2. The advisory boards will conduct their own interviews with candidates and make a recommendation to the city council. 3. The applicants will attend a meeting prior to the advisory board's interview. 4. The city council may request that advisory boards or staff submit questions to ask the candidates. 5. Prior to the city council making their selection, all information provided by staff, advisory boards, and the applicants will be considered. Other factors such as longevity or geography in the community may be considered as well when making their selection. BACKGROUND On October 6, 2003, the planning commission interviewed two applicants for their vacancy. The commission voted as follows (the lower the points, the higher the ranking): Jeff Bartol - 6 points Roger Posch -12 points On October 14, 2003, the CDRB interviewed three applicants for their vacancy. The CDRB voted as follows (the lower the points, the higher the ranking): Jeff Bartol - 4 points Lany Hendrickson - 9 points Roger Posch -11 points RECOMMENDATIONS A. Interview the applicants and appoint a person to serve on the planning commission. This person would fill the unfinished term on the planning commission that would end on December 31, 2004. B. Interview the applicants and appoint a person to serve on the community design review board. This person would fill the unfinished term on the CDRB that would end on December 31, 2004. kr/p:planning commission/pc and cdrb appt(2).03 Attachments: 1. Planning Commissioner's Location Map 2. Planning Commission Applicant's Location Map 3. CDRB Member/Applicants Map 4. Jeff Bartol Application and Resume 5. Larry Hendrickson Application 6. Roger Posch Application 2 Attachment 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ° County of Ramsey, Minnesota i I I , I ~ ~ K L 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Mn. D E I v I DO N w„re (651) 770-4500 55109 ® ' slzoN LEGEND ~ S .. I I . J'I' ~ i ~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~2 fv BBON - `~ ` - ° r ~ v .1 __ 2 _ !_ ~~ e `" . ' ~ d F y ~- ' SJ:: ' ~ ~ p ~\ z ~~,.,, ~ fir, ~. , -z- a ~ l ~ j _2e.uN 28{ON - ~- ~ ;~ ~ ~ - A € 8~ ~ 3 "rj` a I v ~ B ~ x A y I B I C \, ~ ® r _~~ r l ~ -zwoN Q ® 2{OON / ~q ~ ° _ { ~ _ "' v 7 v `~` /y ~ ¢ d ° v Y ~ etc 1 v 0' 1700 3100' 5100' BOOD~ -_ 2160N v ~ 3 ~ .~ ( ' v ~ . . ' 2160N - ~ i u ~ ~~_ e_. -I~ =-rr ~ S /~ ' ! (. v ~ ~ r ~ ~ - ~ ~ A l ..v a -- ,~~ r wy ~ 0 ~ 1 ~~ J 1 I 5 5 g~ ~t i1 A ~e ~T ~ - ! ! ~ y v ~ ~ a ~d ° . ~rI ~ ~, ~~ I ~ ~ ~ • -. v ~ r ~e a ~ ~,~ '!1 .tiJN)' EAU( ~ w'~n.-c - ' ~ 192aN 1920N V .,v -1 Y '~ 6 Y a a 93 •C ~ D ~ aa f g i ! ~~®~f ' ~ 6 ¢ ! 3 ~ ! 1. '/ ~ - ® ` L~ o ~ tl Z 33 e ~ •P ~ v .. ... J ~ ~ ~ 3 1 ~ I r; ~ i u.w. 3 r ~ ,fi80N SLANT ~ PAUI 7 ~ ] AI I e I~ I D I E ~ ~ ~ m _ I F I~ I N ~~ ~i o ~ N I{{oN - ! ~ '~ ~~~ r _. ~'-- IRON i a.'. _ e ~- 1200N -s ~ S D ~ R 9 ~980N MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION ! i _~9;~<'~s ~" _D ]2UN rraine B. Fischer, Chair Lo ~fushar Desai „> a6-a- ~' ~ ~ I ~`~- „ --{~N 1812 Furness Street 2937 Edward Street _ Maplewood MN 55109 Maplewood MN 55109 o D ~~ ,2 Dale Trippler ©William Rossbach ~ I "-~ _ ~ 1201 Junction Avenue 1386 County Road C } ~~ ~ I ~ _ = I Maplewood MN 55109-3433 Maplewood, MN 55109 c ° I i ~ -DD ; Paul Mueller OGary Pearson e:- "°S 1820 Onacrest Court 1209 Antelope Way ~°° --- ~ ~` t - lewood MN 55117 Ma Maplewood MN 55119 15 = p n h i ®Jackie Monahan-Junek - .805 w ~ r Y a ~ - I c Mary Dier 2624 Promontory Place 2430 LarpenteurAvenue "~ . ° - ,~ " Maplewood MN 55119 Maplewood MN 55119 e ~ ~ - a,6 .v e -]295 ! B • tl 11 I a. •.. C 3 - __ 9605 l-c. °°` ~ ! t8 rW ~' ~ • f I `° r I ,-= ~ \ ~'-':- 12005 v 19 ~` 20 ® FA.NSEY COUfltt ~ 16805 rvn5.nnlr.-,7L~ !'frrl/rT~ 3 ~ ~ ~ s ,P[\nvn\CI TY SINGLE LINE,tlrp 02/l0/2003 05~06~4] PM CST - C/TY OF MAPLEWOOD _ s _ County of Ramsey, Minnesoto 1830 Eost County Road B, Maplewood, Mn. I o E r G N i (651) 770-4500 55109 ®~ -e..-: ~~ s ~ LEGEND T ~I I A I 9O ®I C 2100N ~J i.~ i 4 !~ q ut n.e eaw.Ai~ ,~. ... --, _. ~ _ e __ w- ~ 2180N 5 1920N 6 1fi80N 3120n x 7 ~ e 28e0N ~~ ~ _ yy"' 2 3 ~~Q j1J Il y a` 3L ~ d i. 2saoN - - I ~~mf 8 I d .m:e ~k:,,;..,,r.. L - 3120N f ` ~ : ~ OY .~~ ~~ P ~~ ®_as$ ~~ ~ - ~ - 2980N a ~,I ~\ ; NOR',h vnl '„I~t '/ 2 of ~~ --zeaoN \ N J ~ ~ ~ -2~OON s "- 0' 1700' 3a00' s100' 8e00' _ - 21fi0N - 0" 1" 2" J" 4" _ SCAIE 5 Nurzn~ suLar ~auL • M` ~ 1920N v ~' 7 ~ ° 4 B e "'~~ `€ ® ~. ti ~ e .~. ~Ip-1{EI 1 ~ rw~ ~ ~ 161 ~I 81 li `1/81 I I •a ~1 "9 I~•. ~' LL i~ t ~ 1 E 1 - ~ l f ~ 9 i ~'" ._w. jj~ 1690N I \ 1( ~ l 1 T \il ~,e G © ® S,NNf ~ PAUL. ~ ~ ...a °I 1 8 1 ~ I~ I E I P I G I N 1~ ~ ' - - - °"~.. ~1 i~ .. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS ~ __ ` e ~. 0 1200N 1. Jeff Bartol - - _.._ .~t g 2702 Pinkspire Lane - _ ~-' , i ,. Maplewood, MN 55119 ~~~°- -9~N Y ~ ,g :" 2. Roger Posch , °~ ~ °,~ _ 3 __,20N 1583 County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 '- ° 'a ` " ~, I ~__ ~ .0 "" __aBON ~ ! 12 i w. ® e (~~® --210N ~~ ~' ~~ ~. ~ ~ i _ -ao ~l s 1 ~ Ia P«' ~~` -zags :sae ~` Ls ~4 ui~~Y ~-asos _ a ~~ ~ ~ ' 16 n. ~ Y ~ .~ ~ J20S 9605 r'~l`~ _ ®, ,6 i~~ _ 19 a 4~i= ® 14105 J' 20 ® ftaNSEY CLUn~n' - 1680$ 4 W~S.,~NGT91..~n,e,J, K L SINGEE LiNE.d«g 02/10/2903 ~~05~96~1J PN CST ~ « ~ ~ «......~,«n n~ ~~ J~ n. ~_~ N W Applicants CDRB Members/Applicants Attachment 4 AUG 21 2003 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM NAME ~ ~~~ l ~ACZ ~ o ~ ADDRESS Z.?02 h,nk,~~tr~ Lane. F'~ayl~w~o~ MN ~s/! PHONE NO. Work: (~Sl- 331- 1 vv~ Home: ~~ /- 33v- ggq g DATE 8//z 1 y 3 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? (9 rnon ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ Hears t r, 7w, ~ l', ~, e s 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes No ~/ Comments: 3) On which Board or Commission are interested in serving? (please check) Community Design Review Board Park & Recreation Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority ~ Planning. Commission Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 4) Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsi\bilities? 1 ~n av~ c. h c~ ~ k o~ (rc~~ v n ~ t n o. r ~~n ~ ~ e c--t z~ r e. (, ~ GJ ec.. r 5 0~ -~ -~~ U o~ M ) t50 I havE SoMe. FGM~llart~~ W~+l~ Ct~~ P\c~,nn11lnq a~n~ l/~ou5~,nc' ~G'~/e.lE~fsP~,rrr~. ~ o~~=o Y~avQ Q~~e_nslvQ., ~?c~Qr~en'~e_ w~~~, end 0.cces°~ 'tom `e4~ ` Cor.-r~/-~Q_r r~~c~lPC- 17es~~j~'. 5) .List other organizations or clubs in the Community in whitch you have been or are an active participant: j hcx,6jt1 Ive been very o~c-~„/e- IP ma•+~ Prc*T'ess,<,nGt cs.Svsoc,c,.-F-ro/~ ~ o~.,d In tiur Ghure`n ~ U~}~I now.1 .~ Ir.av~ nvI- hc.,~1- -10,+e, -~rM~ or o>?~c~~}~~~~~ -~o be«~Me. more. ~nvotved w~-~~n connr+un~~y tsauC.s. 6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission? 2 ha~L o-lwe,ys ~el~ -~-~a-F S 51~av1~ he g,v~na~, n-~a~.. ba.e k -}c~ Mtn cc~iv,rrtvni ~~~ . haw ~-\na'~ ova- -I-~nre~ c~n, \c~ r en G.fG. C,fG~wtn , .T wota\~ ~~1~e. eta Par ~l ~~ ~a. I c._ w l +~ ~'~~- P~onn~n~ C.on~,~~ar{~,~. Qn~.> e~ssls~" In kee.to,ne~ Me.ta4eux~o~ o. svcce_ss~u~ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ~ "G` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" "~' "' `'n' ~ `~ ` THE INFORMATION CONTAINED /N THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC EXCEPT FOR HOME AND WORK TELEPHONE NUMBERS. S:\CTY MGR\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION.doc 4/4/02 6 Jeffrey A. Bartol as~~f-~t r-i~~a ~~~.. ... an opporbun'dy to deploy 28 years of computer experiemoe in R surah ea t:~DE3, content management, file archives, database integration and. Web ~ IoHs "i[~ e identifying production, automation and comrrrunication rnaeds; ding. ~ ar ~ ~, . integrating, and maintaining user~riendy systems and tedtr-ologicat sdvanoements to irnpnWe` vendor relations, marketing oommunicatiais, and sales opptxturt~ie&. I seek a business environment that is challenging yef flex~ie; one that enoor~ges an e~xet~ #~°~ k;; ., creative approach while committed tD professional standards,. sari and ~ : ,. sr4 I believe strongly in incentive-based compensations, advarfr~erneras sort ~: l am ~; , approach and exercise it with those it,at work with me and for me. tam most. with sn~et ao~ jet^_ '- corporations that function as smaller, intimate teams with a carnm~riexrt to the m success ~ #s ~ °~ ' the opportunity to minimize bureaucratic obstacles. - - Over the last 28 years, 1 have reinvented myself several times and believe this is a new a of t~.Cc»Ap+''~; industry. The company I work for must recognize this, support "d and even a ~. Tlfa'team I wodc w~ ate' . ", share this same commitment; exchanging information and with the ~ sd!~ancerrrsnts 1l~It dti~+ti' our economy, determine team success, and ensure the lag-term vaN~re c~ ~ team merger; Integral was incorporated in December of 2t~0 by a group of R pn~essior-als that were - ctdrt.rom refuges. We were convinced, however, that the World Wide Web would "sift become a a~ic~ irrbnrt~m tt~-t and business tool; and that integration services and development of tN t'RAinet and EXTRAnet vYrwld corrbrele b be in demand. As the director of content management, I developed business relationships with v~Ors ar~c# malnp opportunities in areas such as document managemenrt, asset management, and web-oor-tant r~-hagernA~ Cl ttte couple years we've developed web-based business applications slid fiie,acverss sysfierrrs for t~ferent bran of ~- government, the DoD, defense contractors, and kx~l camrrrerci~ enteies in markets such as legal services and low-income housing regulations. During the last iwo economically challenged years, Integral has doubted in size and tripled our revenue base. YVe have developed a reputation for project management and dung qty s~c~kxlior-s on sdtiedute and a lirtrt- fixed price. BrighTech was a small web-application developer and systems itaegiratpr that had gained a gnea~ deed t~f and success with the dot.com and eCommetce explosion in ttte labs '190~'s. Wh~e working for bath C Banta, I often outsourced high-end technical problems and aistorri dEtirrelaprnent prajecls to Btighfieclt; they h~l tam instrumental in developing both Cdorttouse's Rover and Ban's image-Suer- 1 joined BiighTech td the product development and marketing of what was b become .their oven cxlriinerrial¢ed Rtedie8eeorxe'-. Unfortunately, the dot.com craze imploded, Brightech's traditional reveiritie s#sam dried up, and the - _ , product was woefully under-funded. After seven myths, it bec~rne obvla.+s that BrighTech cx~uld -rot txte against a rapidly growing number of well~'inartced competitors ate Microsoft, 1]aicu-nant~en, ~~Ife-lViet, hit, Vignette and over a hundred others. - ,: The Banta Digital Group is a divisi~ of the ~ I ~- ~ ' ` ~ . "~ sofMrare development group, Banta Integrated Med~t in Cmn~xid~ Mesa). #1~wtlMplr high-end content management sdutton to be sdd bE~t as a Banta srrrvi~e ark as ~ . prepress and corporate marcom entries. However, sirwe tt>e~ Product. ~, rem ~'' .,~ was brought on board to basically tec~te the same low~end in-hocrse ~ t~ 1 hac3 ~, Colorhouse as a stop-gap measure. In less tltEg1 a year, we sealed a DAM. apltttloh ~: " successfully addressed the internal workflow, OPI and ard'tive needs fccx° ms's three. pdrepre~# ~ sdd to Banta's prepress customers for their DAM, w~ktbw and 1He access Heads.: The continued success of this lower-end solution, /mage•.Stl~; became P - stop selling services that competed with Banta's m~ion-darer B-kAedia, ~d out de~taep Though relocating to Massachusetts to worts with 6-MsdFa +~ras an op~~, t ~ r'ny ~~ oPjP~~! r: Banta were limited. - This was a new position at Colorhouse that reported directly lc> the C+DO and ryas cued b add-+asa t!'~s ~ ' application and service of Digital Asset Management or DAM. C~olori>Kxase had p~-' P+~ a hi¢t erl~t, ~~ solution (MediaAssets) as well as a 1.4 terabyte laser disk jukebox- I was thred b dafeamina wttietl+-er'the ~~ solution could be successfully depbyed in a prepress production errvi~+or-ment or replete # with a Hyore ~: ': product; and then integrate that product with both the laser jukebox acct additior-at terabytes afi f2AtD on e:5U~ .'' server and their existing OPI (prepress file woridlow system). The decision was made to replace the "embedded image' approhch of the proprie~ay with tbe- ,Hard open-ended, customizable Telescope by NorthPlaa~s - a soluliott fat supported ~ s~rtdatd Sk2t end rem c~ ' all major platforms including SUN Solaris. We also replaced IPTs CaHOPI with the OPI irr-mergireg - starodend. FullPress by Xinet. We integrated both these produtrs with the S11N-based stooge ~'I addressed the in-house workflow, job-tracking and archival needs fcx ovefi 40 Maofiased ~- I then worked closely with Colofiouse's marketing and sales tD extend our DAM so~tion (Rove-~ to exla~kg and new prepress customers. By working closely with the TecMical Services group (IT) as w+eN as extetrtat;vendotis...sys#em integrators, and outsouroe prograrruners -1 was able to accomplish'~ae goals within 18 mon#is and u~ier lam. MediaWay was a relatively new company (established in 1993) that tmc# just released a Meta version of 4aaets, a digital asset management solution based on their awn propriefaDr ot~jed-oriented relation database - i reported directly to the CEO and President of Sales and Marketarg. As`the Midwest Manager, Hry ~ w!e~ quite broad, and during these early years of asset mart, one of mY PdY roles was that ~ ~* t designed and conducted various seminars atxi traaring courses ihrrxghout the mid-west. f sokt direct into aors accounts, ad agencies, printers, prepress and photo labs. Since MediaWay's goal was to establish a VAR channel, my responsibilities included ider-tifying, selecting, trainir>rg and ~ these VARs with tlx~r iot'~ After each sale, I participated in the installation and integration of #re software on NT arxi Safaris systems, trained the users, and assisted with database schema desgn, population and deployment. Though the top salesman in '96, I did fall short of my personal sales gcx~. Tips proprietary soNttrort Proved to haws fundamental flaws resulting in very difficx,lt and often unsucxx3sstul 1[rstaNations, very long sales uydes and a shrmkk-g list of reference accounts. 2 of 3 Jeffrey A. Bartol 651-331-1044 8 :'< MicroFrame was a start up company &~ 1987 of five engineers.- e~actt br+Yt~ing a`diri~; yet fastest growing CAD VARs in the upper. irsd~est. My resp~ ~t product selection, market anaysis and corporate level safes. Hea~'ing up was on the software products with APts suPfaentto enable ra~aiorr- develnprr+~ry+t ems` enough to justify development costs. The most fregc~tty used. #~ ndtMed ;1.. ,, RDBMS's. Accomplishments included being the country's #1 tBM-CADAM VAR for iwn and dt~w~i,'~- CADD system to be used in storage radk and. mezzanine desigtr aM ~ ~: f' layout and test for dreuit bgic and ladder diagrams ~ 3AA, aril assi~ed moor ~.[,1 solutions and services including: FMC, TetrePak, Telex Comrmania~orrs, 3M.-.and ttte ftidt GIS was one of the first CAD VARs in the Twin Cities - representing a variety,of !~fFerent ~=L1 " the manufacturing, engineering and architectural communities. 1 ooordirtateEl at[ elbrts rel~eirt b cusi~rtt and system integration. 1 devebped one of the frost pmametric CA[3D usaf ~ tslndgdtr architectural specification and was respons~le for the sale and irtsort of CA{rfU at some of the ~`, manufacturing firms including: Ellerbe Becket, l(ICE ~ Assocates, Met~Matic htc.. ~rtdarsawt ~, ~'tiMC° ~~% FMC is a desgn and manufacturer for the federal government and navel ~. As a 3uppott Ana~t, 't +~1Mt ;x° responsible for identifying needs and soh~tiorts for various applik~tiorts of CAt~CAM (~er~#kiad` f~ Manufacturing) including: med~anical er~kteering, eledtic8t engineerktg, PC-board ta~rout~, sofid ~ tlr, element analysis, NC {numerical control), and tooling. Respo indtxied end-+~se~g artd supp~L ~ .~. scheduling and utilization, software testing, trouble-shooting and mart nepor4rtg. As the CADD Supervisor for the largest architectural firm. in Minnesota, 1 was responsble fore tfte vla. ramfications and ROI for implementing ante of the first architertkrra! CADD systems in the catu~y, t tn~ett aril! supervised the initial operating staff and coordinated the userlCADD interface, work-flaw and prakion ~. t was also responsible for. maintaining system security ~ file. back-mss; establishing and r-g i~ snap t[r+d ` company standard operating procedures, file naming systems and drarvuig layer ; and the devnt of a comprehensive library of construction details, symbols and notes. Various CAD, CAM, FEA, Solid Modeling, Database Managemer#, Eperating Systems and Administrative classes -Over 1,000 hours between 1975 and t99t3. t also have over 200 hours of sales training including curriculum provided by IBM and Au1ioD~tc; the most recenf included the Masterfulind Sales Training program offered by YVet. (Course deta~s available upon request.) Bachelor of Architecture, University of Minnesota (1976 -1982) Professional Associations include American Institute of Ardtitec'ts, Soclety of (tAecttartik~i Engineers, AIIM, International Prepress Association, Prkttirtg hte ofi America (PiA), American Advertising Federation (AdFed), and IDEA~artoe (previously Graphic Communications Assodation where 1 assisted in developing. their n>ad map ~ ;, Production in the Graphic Arts° - ava~able upon request). I have a#eo been a frequent guest speaker at conferences for most of these assoc~tions. References available upon request. 3 of 3 Jeffroy A Bartel 651-331-1044 9 Attachment 5 y~-`=- CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ,: APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM NAME 1~ ~Pci~~V ~ ~IEtJ'l~~~t~~t~\ ~v~.. zIP SSIoR ADDRESS ~°~30 R\~E PHONE NO. Work' ~S~ - 1 Home: ~S I-111 ' ~S(AU DATE ~ E~P'r - ~ C~~~ ~o CoSl~~3(o---1S~3 eMM~ ~ ~K en r~cksonl~ trmm.~otn 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? ~ a Y ~ S 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes No Comments: ~ C c f~S ~ >r~ i wT LPN ~ Fo ~ M J o ~ pt-` Tkt-~ M C 4 fro sc tuo L ~RESE~' ~ M~SotZ P0.o~~ i-.1. pc~CEl~a-a~ ~~~~~~~/ Sc~nu~~ M~,ti~s. .~ ~-c ~Eea1 ~P~Y~D trt- 3 ry, ~ ~ ~ Pau < Y~(zs w ~~+ ~~- 1-.1 cl~ettS i N ~ ~p~ ~~1,(~bE1"~BJT ~E5P0145~~tL~TI~ r 3) On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check) _ Community Design Review Board Park & Recreation Commission _~ Housing & Redevelopment Authority .~_ Planning Commission Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 4) Do you have any s e ific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities? ~~~.~ ~.s~a~ss MkNtts~~ 1~E6~FE ~M M~Ropot.~.l S~~ UNN6~.Sm~ ~~ g~eFtcNr~ 1 N 1~-PIN 6 X5.5 ~ 5 S-c~rc~~~c ~~~-~~ ~~T P ~n,~ s t~ lt-~- $tc . ~ Z ~ -~ C ~ 55 oc.1~1~ ~~ ~~Z' k,a ~ l n1 t~ ~ ~~~ Ct, SZ' tr-c~ l ~' C-~~r(~ ~~,a~.~ G h,~ n ~'t'~-Y ~ ~ o o V ~kLL Ce~sT "tom , ~5-ra.~~~a o~~ SK~..`s its P E~~ Mt~4cs~~r ~ ~ ~ s ~ s o F v Rtw.E - ~~~ {~c-nv ~r~ w ~~c--t w i~~ ~~*•.-cE ~TH'E C~~cy S C~,±~u ~ ~ ~i-c kt~ +tiY 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: 0~.1~ ity Mi~PLE~.3c~e~ 6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission? 1S ~o Pis ' ~~~ S I N G~~ ~ M OST ` M f' a ~"c~t*-'T ~Y ~~, ~-~~~,~6.s , ~~~v~ Ca~V E ~Prct~ `r° ~ cot~w.~u~ry' ~ soN~~ o~ C~ ~~ ~-t-s ~o CnN-~a~~ ~u,~c~s i-~J ~ ~~~~ G-t~~~ct~ ~ t~°~ F ~''`~ ~y lT ~E l~1JV ~~ ~ MF]J'i PGl_ To tT~Mt~ (~~be'~RoFS ~ W ~~ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ~ ` SKtV-S ~ EU,cY ~EV~-oP~-J~ Z ~~ ~ca.`an W ~itt~J Pct~~ ©RPcL Co t'~Mv~wl~clctlo~.1S ~ ` r `~~ "~-Rf1 - aKS~ M~'C~co~ OLO~ ~*1 ~ ~f1-W R~/S ~O~/ S~o~c~~,\c GO~'CLS ~ov~bkl an, ~ki'kC' P {ZF~J~JT O Q~ o ~'C~-t N ~'ri 65 (Z L a N ~ -~~t'~ ~ Rc W~ ~~'(k1N~ 01.1 N'~ ~'~ - ~ i,.~c~Kl~1~ W ~-tt~4 C~,SS- ~,,N~oNP TEI,~a "'Cv '~E ~E~u~~S . ; H-rN~ S~Ro-.16 PRaiEZT Mk1JKE,E7~tE7~~1T SK~L~s THE (NFORMA,TION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PUBLIC... ~JA LEfto~.s~tP P~~~~TFS ~ GNcLu.~~N6 W1u~t~~ _ 't~sK~%~~ Fi.-gc~6t~~Yy Maa ~~bo-rtt~c~ Skt~~S FORMS\BRDBCOMM.APL '~ O 10195 ~~U ~> _ _~'. ~s o f1 r-. Pmt qc - ~a ~ c ~ . ©~ cep. 1 M-~cv . N C S ~v afl ~o !~ ~ ~a- y `~ {~ {Zp {~ p ~C~-`~ ~i ~p k lJ-~ 113. ~E~1 O d.1T h'~-- 1 'to M 6 ~p N STRa~ Crtc ~(~I l N (. W v RKE D i N ~-~CPC"~- 1 ~ bt~ST'P~' to (Z ~u 1~ yE~RS . 11 Attachment 6 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM NAME dta -~ (~~sc- h ADDRESS ~ / 3 a' ZIP=~iT PHONE NO. Work: s - - L Home: (;.5 !- ~ ~o° 6`i5`$ EMAIL (Lf~PoSc N ~ C 3 ti UIIZnI ~~ a c-o ~~'! _FAX l~s' - - ~ moo- Si XSa 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? `~-~( ~i.,eurc 2) Will other commitments make regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes No J Comments: On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (please check) A description of the duties of each committee is on back. Community Design Review Board ark & Recreation Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority ~lanning Commission Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 4) Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commisison's scope of responsibilities? N p , 5) List other organizations or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: C ~ ~ l ~ ~, S ~5 / ' N' 1 ~/~ ~[. Sao,-~ D S l,f ~ c"~ G I t~// ~.e,a~~ ~1~,~ ~,~ ~y ~~~ l - >4~. 6) Why would you like to serve on the Board o//r Commmission? ~ ~ `~'~ i CsL ~~ /'~ -'~- ~ ~ u/' ,bO C ~ G ~ ~ ~-e.. ~ ~ ~l a u-i t-o ~ 'Ja ~-~ a V ~ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION AND ANY ATTACHMENT PROVIDED ARE CONSIDERED _.. ,. PUBLIC INFORMATION. WORD/BRD&COMM 04/02 12 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2003 VI. NEW BUSINESS e. Planning Commission Applicant Interviews Mr. Roberts said the planning commission has a vacancy created by the resignation of Matt Ledvina. Attached in the staff report is a map of where the current planning commissioners reside and where the two candidates live along with their application forms. The first applicant to be interviewed was Mr. Jeff Bartol, 2702 Pinkspire Lane. Chairperson Rossbach asked if Mr. Bartol has any problem with the time commitment to meet twice a month and possibly staying late into the evening? Mr. Bartol said he has no problem working the two meetings of the month or working late into the evening. Chairperson Rossbach asked if Mr. Bartol would have any difficulty finding the time to review the planning commission packet and doing some site inspections? Mr. Bartol said no his current employment is very flexible and he can work it into his schedule reviewing the planning commission packet and doing the site inspections. Chairperson Rossbach asked Mr. Bartol what he does for a living? Mr. Bartol said he is heavily involved with computers with system integration, consulting, website design and earlier in his career he did engineering work with a computerized design in the architectural field. His background is in architecture from his studies at the University. Commissioner Pearson said he assumed with Mr. Bartol's background he would not have any difficulty deciphering blueprints? Mr. Bartol said no. Chairperson Rossbach asked how Mr. Bartol felt about affordable housing in the City of Maplewood? Mr. Bartol said like Commissioner Pearson he is concerned about the children in affordable housing and where they will go to play. Many people that live in affordable housing have several children and they need someplace to play. He commended the commission on the process these projects go through and the questions that are asked. He asked the commission what a CUP and a PUD are? The planning commission members explained what the two meant and how they are used. Commissioner Monahan-Junek asked what Mr. Bartol could do as a planning commission member to foster a sense of community to the residents that live in the south end of the community and the people that live in the north end of Maplewood? Mr. Bartol said that is a difficult question to answer. He said he has only lived in Maplewood for 6 to 8 months and prior to that he lived in the Como Park area. He has really enjoyed the Battle Creek area and wished he had known about it long ago. He thinks that would be a wonderful area to have a citywide get together for people to gather and get to know the people in their community better. He said his daughter lives in St. Paul and uses the dog walk there to walk her dog. Commissioner Trippler said in reviewing Mr. Bartol's application he noticed he wanted to give back to the community and he wondered how Mr. Bartol decided to apply for the planning commission opening with his background and not for the community design review board? Mr. Bartol said he applied for both the commission and the board opening at the request of Mary Dierich who recommended he apply for the commission and one of the city staff members suggested he apply for the board. He said he would feel useful and productive on either the commission or the board. He wants to get back into the urban development, city planning and architectural skills that he acquired 25 years ago and let go by the wayside. The second applicant to be interviewed was Roger Posch, 1583 County Road B. Chairperson Rossbach asked if Mr. Posch has any problem with the time commitment to meet twice a month and possibly staying late into the evening? Mr. Posch said no. Chairperson Rossbach asked if Mr. Posch would have any difficulty finding the time to review the planning commission packet and doing site inspections? Mr. Posch said no. Chairperson Rossbach asked Mr. Posch what he does for a living and on a day-to- day basis? Mr. Posch said he is a realtor at Coldwell Banker Burnet Realty. Outside of work he belongs to a church and is part of the loaves and fishes program and is involved with Weaver Elementary school fundraising. Commissioner Monahan-Junek asked Mr. Posch what he could do as a planning commission member to foster a sense of community to the residents that live in the south end of the community and the people that live in the north end of Maplewood? Mr. Posch said he is open-minded and is not sure about pulling people together. Commissioner Dierich said Mr. Posch's application said he wants to be a voice for his neighborhood. She asked what issues Mr. Posch would like to be able to impact if he were on the planning commission? Mr. Posch said it's not so much any particular issue as much as he would like to help notify all residents to let them know what is going on or what will be happening in the community. Commissioner Dierich asked Mr. Posch if there was a particular issue he would be more interested in such as density, affordable housing, traffic or protection of water that he could speak to? Mr. Posch said there are no individual issues that he is interested in; he just wants to have an understanding of the issues and have a voice in what is going on in Maplewood. Commissioner Desai said there has been a lot of discussion about workforce housing. As a realtor, in your opinion, where do you stand in terms of workforce housing in the City of Maplewood? Mr. Posch said in the past Maplewood has had affordable housing but property continues to increase and homes are getting more expensive. If Maplewood had more affordable housing as one of the first ring suburbs to downtown St. Paul, people could live here and bus downtown to work so there could be more affordable housing for the city. Mr. Roberts asked Mr. Posch what he thinks the City of Maplewood did really well in terms of development and what the city has done that he did not care for? Mr. Posch said he thinks the Maplewood Mall was something the city did very well with the proximity of the freeway and he also likes the bike trails in the city. The Maplewood Community Center is something he does not like that the city developed. He said he heard the community center is not making money for the city and the only reason he goes there is for the plays and shows in the theatre. Commissioner Pearson asked if Mr. Posch has any problem reading blueprints or plans? Mr. Posch said no. Commissioner Pearson asked if Mr. Posch thought there was anything the planning commission could have addressed during the items that were reviewed tonight? Mr. Posch said nothing comes to mind. Chairperson Rossbach asked staff what Mr. Posch could do if for example he had some real estate listings and he had a conflict of interest with something the planning commission was reviewing? Mr. Roberts said potentially Mr. Posch would have a conflict of interest if the listing he had were going to be redeveloped. Mr. Posch said he understands that he would abstain from the discussion or recommend that another agent take the listing. Mr. Roberts said the two applicants also applied for the opening on the Community Design Review Board and those interviews will be held Tuesday, October 12, 2003. The applicant with the lowest score is the candidate of choice and that person would be recommended to the city council. The results of the voting by the planning commission members were as follows: The first applicant interviewed, Jeff Bartol scored 6 points. The second applicant interviewed, Roger Posch scored 12 points. Mr. Roberts said the candidates would be notified of the city council meeting date for the final interview for the city council to make the final decision. DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2003 IX. STAFF PRESENTATIONS a. Interview of Applicants for CDRB Membership Ms. Finwall said there are three applicants for the community design review board (CDRB) vacancy, which include Jeffrey Bartol, Larry Hendrickson, and Roger Posch. The three applicants are to be interviewed and ranked by the board. The vacancy is for the remainder of Craig Jorgenson's two-year term that would end January 1, 2004. a. Jeffrey Bartol, 2702 Pinkspire Lane, Maplewood. Mr. Bartol said he moved to south Maplewood last March and prior to that he lived in St. Paul in the Como area for over 20 years. After moving from St. Paul he felt guilty never having given back to the city. When he moved to Maplewood he made a personal commitment to give back to the city and that is why he is applying for this board position. Chairperson Ledvina asked if Mr. Bartol understood the commitment of being on this board that meets at 6:00 p.m. twice a month on the second and fourth Tuesday's of the month? Mr. Bartol said yes, he has a flexible work schedule and there should not be any difficulty making the meeting dates and times. Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Bartol if he had any problems taking time to read the packets that are sent in the mail and going out to do site inspections prior to the meeting time? Mr. Bartol said his work schedule is very flexible and he has no problem taking time in the evening to read the packets and leaving work a bit early to do the site inspections. Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Bartol what development he thinks was done well in Maplewood? Mr. Bartol said he likes the New Century development in his neighborhood with the Arts and Craftsman style homes that have been built. They did a very nice job combining single family and multi-family dwellings together with a very high standard making the neighborhood look nice. Each home has its own architectural detail and character and it all blends in so well. Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Bartol if there was anything he didn't like that was developed in Maplewood? Mr. Bartol said he would be reluctant to come up with a derogatory or critical statement of the city. Because of the shape of Maplewood he thinks the city is challenged with being surrounded by other suburbs. Board member Shankar said he noticed Mr. Bartol applied for the opening on the planning commission as well as the board. He asked Mr. Bartol which opening he was more interested in? Mr. Bartol said he is interested in both the commission and the board opening and will be going before the city council as an applicant for both openings. Board member Olson said Mr. Bartol's application says he has a background in architecture and she would like more information on that background? Mr. Bartol said architecture was his first love when he was a child. He attended the University of Minnesota for his Bachelor degree in architecture. He also worked for Ellerbe Architects as a junior draftsman/architect. Working with the CAD system he gravitated towards his second love, which was computers. Because of his love for computers he continued in that field and has not practiced architecture for years now. Board member Longrie-Kline asked Mr. Bartol what he does in his current position? Mr. Bartol said he does a fair amount of project management, systems integration, needs assessment, computer database integration, and Internet data exchange. Board member Shankar asked if Mr. Bartol's passion was more towards setbacks, wetland, and density issues, which would be approved by the planning commission or would it be towards aesthetics, building materials, and landscaping, which would be approved by the community design review board? Mr. Bartol said he is torn and the planning commission asked the same question of him in his last interview. He would enjoy working with either group and he feels he is qualified for either opening. b. Larry Hendrickson, 1930 Price Avenue, Maplewood. Mr. Hendrickson said he has lived in the city over 14 years now. He has worked for 3M for 24 years now and his job function is sewing surplus and byproducts and many other things in between. He has communication skills and leads the organizational effort in both the newsletter and both work-based products at 3M. Prior to working at 3M he worked in residential and commercial construction. Chairperson Ledvina said the community design review board meets the second and fourth Tuesday's of each month at 6:00 p.m. and he asked if that would be a problem with Mr. Hendrickson's schedule? Mr. Hendrickson said no. Chairperson Ledvina asked if Mr. Hendrickson had any questions or comments regarding what was discussed at the meeting tonight? Mr. Hendrickson said no questions but he thinks the input the board members offered to the staff is very valuable. Chairperson Ledvina asked if Mr. Hendrickson could give an example of a recent development that he felt was done very well in terms of building and site design? Mr. Hendrickson said he thinks the city hall is a great service to the community. He likes the senior housing that has been developed in the city and there is a definite need for it. The Maplewood Mall needs some very good guidance and redevelopment is key to the area. Board member Longrie-Kline asked Mr. Hendrickson if there was an old building in the city would he prefer that the building be renovated and be reused as a new use or totally start new with an architectural plan and develop something new. Mr. Hendrickson said in St. Louis, Missouri, they took a huge old train depot and added new shops and a hotel inside it. Aesthetically, it looks phenomenal, so he would prefer to reuse the building depending on the condition. Board member Longrie-Kline asked Mr. Hendrickson what he does with web-based applications in his job? Mr. Hendrickson said his organization communicates to the external and internal customers and clients. They have an "Internet" and an "intranet" to communicate items of interest, and surplus equipment that is available. The intranet is a marketing tool of resource recovery and they conduct some monthly sales and advertisements at the distribution center. The rest is confidential information. Board member Longrie-Kline said the reason she asked is that the city is moving towards a paperless society with the Internet. One day the public will access the city's Internet site for board packet information and access information so the public can be more knowledgeable. One-day society will be a paperless world and this will be very important to use web-based applicants. Mr. Hendrickson said it is a very good marketing tool and with all the ecological issues today paper will be a thing of the past. It will not be easy and it can be done but the end result will be phenomenal. Board member Olson asked what Mr. Hendrickson's background is in construction and landscaping and what could he contribute to the board? Mr. Hendrickson said he can read blue prints and can understand the infrastructure of the house and the elevations. He can look at something for the aesthetics and has the ability to decide if something will look sharp or not. As far as landscaping, he does not have a formal background in landscaping other than by trial and error. He said he could offer the board his perception of what would look nice. Board member Shankar asked Mr. Hendrickson what the drawbacks and potential are for White Bear Avenue? Mr. Hendrickson said traffic is the number one drawback of White Bear Avenue. He sees pockets of development that need to be redeveloped. He uses the roundabout at English and Frost and thinks it would be nice to have more in the city. Mr. Hendrickson said the city has some big issues with the population increasing and the traffic growing and the roundabout idea may help traffic in certain areas. c. Roger Posch, 1583 County Road B, Maplewood. Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Posch to tell the board something about himself? Mr. Posch said he grew up in North St. Paul and has lived in his current home in Maplewood for 24 years now. He worked at West Publishing for 22 years, and was downsized, and now he works for Coldwell Banker Burnet Realty as a realtor in north Maplewood. He has two children in first and second grade at Weaver Elementary. He does volunteer work at school and church and is a member of the Red Cross. Chairperson Ledvina said the board meets the second and fourth Tuesday's of each month at 6:00 p.m. he asked Mr. Posch if that would be a problem with his schedule? Mr. Posch said no. Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Posch if he would have any problem reviewing the packets that come in the mail and going out to do site inspections prior to the meeting? Mr. Posch said no. Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Posch if he had any questions or comments in regards to the proceedings at this evenings meeting? Mr. Posch said no. Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Posch if he could give an example of developments in Maplewood that he thinks were done well regarding aesthetics and design? Mr. Posch said he thinks Maplewood Mall was done well because of the relationship to the freeway. Chairperson Ledvina asked if there was something more recently developed such as in the last five years? Mr. Posch said no, not off-hand. Board member Olson asked if he has any experience in reading blueprints and working with different types of landscaping and plant identification? Mr. Posch said he studied architectural drafting after he finished high school. The house that he is in he had built so he studied the blueprints. As far as landscaping he has been doing neighbors landscaping for some extra money. Plant identification he is not familiar with yet. Board member Olson asked Mr. Posch if he were presented with a landscaping plan would he be able to decide if the landscaping was too sparse and needed some additional plantings? Mr. Posch said yes. Board member Longrie-Kline asked what Mr. Posch does in his position? Mr. Posch said he is a realtor. Board member Longrie-Kline asked if it is residential or commercial real estate? Mr. Posch said residential. Board member Longrie-Kline said she noticed on his application that Mr. Posch wanted to be a voice for his neighborhood? Mr. Posch said in the past he has talked to people and many people are not aware of what is going on in the city. He said he would go door to door and let people know what is going on in the city. Board member Longrie-Kline said that takes a lot of personal commitment, she asked if Mr. Posch has that kind of time on his hands? She asked if he would see his role on the board as a collaborative of not just driving around to the sites but going to the residents homes and letting them know about future developments and for their input? Mr. Posch said he has not done anything yet because he is not on the board yet but if he were on the board that is what he would do. Many people don't have the time to come to the meetings at the city hall and that is why he would go and knock on doors. Board member Longrie-Kline asked Mr. Posch if he has a lot of spare time because that is a very time consuming job. Mr. Posch said he would make that kind of time. Board member Olson asked as a realtor if he works with developers? Mr. Posch said no he does not; he works with existing residential homeowners. Board member Shankar said there are several car dealerships on Highway 61 and he asked if there was one dealership in particular that catches Mr. Posch's eye as far as building design? Mr. Posch said by KSTP Maplewood Imports has a nice building design and the Saturn dealership somewhere. Board member Olson asked if Mr. Posch sees anything in the city that he has a concern for that the board may be able to help address? Mr. Posch said no not at the moment. The board rated each candidate. The candidate with the lowest score is the person the board will recommend to the city council. a. Jeffrey Bartol received 4 points b. Larry Hendrickson received 9 points c. Roger Posch received 11 points. The candidates for the board opening will be interviewed on October 27, 2003, by the city council.